The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 01-09-01 '-' -...I JANUARY 9, 2001 7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGUlAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HE.MINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments \vill be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission lmder department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman ,vill ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COM!v!ISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless othemise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone ,\ith a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (S61) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ..... ...., www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes Districtl Dist.rict 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA January 9, 2001 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held December 19, 2000. A-ppro{~ 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATION The Board will present awards to Eddie Whitfield, Todd Bevan, and Walter Deemer for their many years of service on various St. Lucie County committees. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA pluS Ac1d-vfw!1(4-~3 ) fty¡{)lÎ')v't'~ _1í1J- PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC WORKS 5A. Resolution No. 00-287/ King's Highway Industrial Park / Street Lighting District- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution providing for the creation and establishment of a Special Street Lighting Improvement District in the King's Highway Industrial Park, and authorize the Chairman and the County Attorney to execute the resolution. f-tpprM ~ NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boaril at these meetings will need a record ofthe proceedmgs and for such purpose may neeil to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any indivIdual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meetin~ should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1418 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ..... ...., REGULAR AGENDA JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) COMìVIUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5B. Resolution No. 00-13 7/0uasi- Tudicial / Guardian Self Storage - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution, subject to the cited conditions, granting a Conditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan Approval for a new 110,450 square foot mini-warehouse and self storage facility. Location: West side of South US 1, approximately 406 feet south of the intersection of Port St. Lucie Boulevard and South US 1. This item was continued to January 9,2001 at the December 5, 2000 Board meeting. The applicant is requesting an additional continuance until January 23,2001. ttpf1ðN&--tv cmtWGÚJ 5C. Resolution No. 01-00l/0uasi- Tudicial / Jeffrey and Tara Tobin - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting the request to define a Class "A" Mobile Home as a Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit for 29.99 acres ofland in the AG-5 (Agriculture -1 du/5acres) Zoning District. Location: 10280 Bluefield Road, on the east side of Bluefield Road, immediately adjacent to the terminus of Bluefield Road. M¡Af6 {~ð 5D. Resolution No. 01-002/0uasi-Tudiciall Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution, subject to the cited conditions, granting a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Site Plan approval to allow for the construction of a 3,192 square foot convenience store "lith five gasoline pumps and an automatic car wash in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. Location: Northeast corner of Miramar Avenue and Turnpike Feeder Road. Mypí JV(\{'& 5E. Resolution No. 0l-004/0uasi-Tudiciall Fort Pierce Air Center - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport to allow for construction of 13,000 square feet of hangar space and 1,820 square feet of office space to an existing hangar for a total of 14,820 square feet of space. Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport AppYúv^t:<p SF. Resolution No. 01-003/0uasi- Tudicial/Miami Latin Church of God - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in zoning from the AR-l (Agriculture, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District to allow for the establishment of a church facility. Location: 5905 Oleander Avenue, on the west side of Oleander Avenue, appr~ximately 100 feet south of Ulrich Ro~d. C!;mlù)lJ1.cLY ~TÚi.n 2~. )UCQ. Gi V.'-i' Ar:pkczfY¡--+UY'-C ßa' (y~t- jRJlt}¡ /Ì-"\I) 2} ",0 1\ ,'Sf7<1T 1i:J ¡))U( K-QiÁ+- u-z,.'J!/.:Y~ ~ I' . r V" . End of Public Hearings - ...., REGULAR AGENDA JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE THREE 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY c. Donation Agreement / Rock Road Jail- Consider staff recommendation to accept the donation of the building subject to the terms and conditions of the Donation Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. ApDft~ Twin Vee Powercats, Inc. Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to s~ì7øl~ent. Resolution No. 01-34/ Rouse Road - Consider st~fr;ecommendation to adopt Resolution No. 01-34. i4p¡Jn)~/i.{d A. B. Vat4J16ÚLY 1: l L þ11f-,------ Jòcuw D cZ J¡ S / ttßØ(LCcJ (ot!!Jr1 ~ ~ /Ó/ ~Zú0UbUìtjd fp }vtCUJî ~ ¡Z,(jj ) tlU COOmfJ iGh ());Vð" , ,we /vlG~\.1lìstmQt (}JhoJ-- ~ IS( CcUJ lJ.Jf.. 1hf .. o~( -thOJJ dÒ, I~ coÞh- - ~ VJ ~\oJ g \ W0 - \.Ovl(jd~J 1U?J'cÞ - OJ~ QÝsr Ca-flwt do . '- '-' CONSENT AGENDA Tanuarv 9. 2001 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 12 through No. 14 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Road & Bridge / Bid Waiver and Purchase - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver and purchase of a Hot Patch truck from Freightliner of South Florida in the amount of $87,316.74. B. Engineering / Bid No. 00-096 / Administration Building Annex Parking Lot \ Ç¡jl/, Drainage Improvements - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid ~ {Ò\U to the low bidder, Johnson-Davis, Inc., in the amount of $103,040, establish ~ß, . the project budget as outlined, and authorize the Chairman to sign the K~ contract as prepared by the County Attorney. _ n )('J" -£¡'ì~l.fWIUt"l u)lll r€SCllfLh etddd7MU-G ~0f'JJ-. 3. PURCHASING --J A. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise for bids for the sale of the Yale EW Electric Overhead 10-ton Hoist. B. Bid No. 01-006 / Enhanced Swale Maintenance - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, CEM Enterprises, Inc. DBA Sunshine Painting, in the amount of $6.77 per foot for swale maintenance and $2.00 per foot for culvert cleaning, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. C. Bid No. 01-061 / Rouse Road Reconstruction - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Sheltra & Sons, in the amount of $51,380 (alternate bid amount), and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 4. UTILITIES Permission to Advertise / Transfer of Beach Club Colony Wastewater System to St. Lucie County from Martin County - Consider staff recommendation to grant the request for permission to advertise a public hearing, consistent with Florida Statute Chapter 125.3401, and schedule the Public Hearing for February 13, 2001 at 9:00 AM, or as soon thereafter as possible 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Change Order No, 2 and No.3 / World of Plastics / Oleander Business Park CDBG Grant Project - Consider staff recommendation to execute the Change Orders for time extensions on work previously completed and to ensure that all grant paperwork is in compliance with state and federal regulations. - -' CONSENT AGENDA JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE TWO 6. ADMINISTRATION Community Development Block Grant Citizen's Advisory Task Force - Consider staff recommendation to ratify Commissioner Bruhn's appointment of Clyde Killer to the Community Development Block Grant Citizen's Advisory Task Force. 7. CENTRAL SERVICES RFP No. 00-097 / Architectural Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the two (2) firms, Edlund & Dreitenbas and REG Architects, and enter into a contract for two (2) years with an option of two (2) - one (1) year extensions. 8. COMMUNITY SERVICES Treasure Coast Community Services Tripartite Board for the St. Lucie / Martin / Okeechobee County Community Action Agency Re-appointments - Consider staff recommendation to Re-appoint Commissioner Paula Le,vis or a designated staff person, and re-appoint Grace McNeil, retired manager of the welfare department, each to serve for another 3-year term. '-' -...I BOARD OF COUNlY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA January 9.2001 REGULAR AGENDA PUBUC HEARINGS PUBLIC WORKS A.l Unsafe Building / 2014 South 35th Street, Fort Pierce, Florida - Consider staff recommendation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 1lI of Chapter 2-5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, that the Board enter an order to repair or demolish the building located at 2014 South 35th Street, Fort Pierce, Florida by April 15, 2001. If the building is not repaired or demolished by April 15, 2001, the County shall demolish the Building and assess the entire cost against the real property where the Buildi,p,g is 19jated. f'1D p fò V'eJ..) A.2 Unsafe Building / 1412 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, Florida - Consider staff recommendation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 1lI of Chapter 2-5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, that the Board enter an order to repair or demolish the building located at 1412 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, Florida by April 15, 2001. If the building is not repaired or demolished by April 15, 2001, the County shall demolish the Building and assess the entire cost against the real property where the Building is located.. () ftpfJr¿i/lfa ' End of Public Hearings CONSENT AGENDA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY A.3 Software Support and Maintenance Agreement Extension - Consider staff recommendation to extend the Software and Maintenance Agreement with Graphic Computer Solutions (GCS) for one (1) year and authorize payment to GCS. {4P 0 (iJ \!'~ ' NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing win be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross~examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462~ 1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty~eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ..... -" ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson CIiffBarnes District 4 District 5 AGENDA January 9, 2001 1. MINUTES ~6ted A. Approve the minutes of the meeting held December 12, 2000. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA ,¿ ~?y{ è~' ~ 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 11 thru No. 14 2. PURCHASING Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise for bids for 18 inch diameter, 6,000 GPM at 4 ft. Static Head, Axial Flow, Stainless Steel, Electric Lift Pumps, purchase and maintenance. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least fortY-eighl(48) hours prior to the meeting. " """" -.,.,; JANUARY 9, 2001 7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion, There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda, PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman \vil! ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. !\'fEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised, Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' '...J www.stlucieco.gov /' / ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 AGENDA January 9, 2001 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held December 19, 2000. 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATION The Board will present awards to Eddie Whitfield, Todd Bevan, and Walter Deemer for their many years of service on various St. Lucie County committees. 3. CONSENT AGEN A C /1) '3 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC WORKS SA. Resolution No. 00-287/ King's Highway Industrial Park / Street Lighting District- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution providing for the creation and establishment of a Special Street Lighting Improvement District in the King's Highway Industrial Park, and authorize the Chairman and the County Attorney to execute the resolution. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boaril at these meetings will need a record of the proceedmgs and for such purpose may neeil to ensure that a verbatim record ofthe proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedin~s, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any partY to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any indivIdual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disahility requiring accommodation to attend this meetin~ should contact the St. Lucie County Commnnity Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1418 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' ...., REGULAR AGENDA JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE nvo PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5B. Resolution No. 00-137/0uasi-Tudicial / Guardian Self Storage - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution, subject to the cited conditions, granting a Conditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan Approval for a new 110,450 square foot mini-warehouse and self storage facility. Location: West side of South US 1, approximately 406 feet south of the intersection of Port St. Lucie Boulevard and South US 1. This item was continued to january 9, 2001 at the December 5, 2000 Board meeting. The applicant is requesting an additional continuance until january 23,2001. 5C. Resolution No. 01-001/0uasi-Tudicial / Jeffrey and Tara Tobin - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting the request to define a Class "A" Mobile Home as a Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit for 29.99 acres of land in the AG-5 (Agriculture -1 du/5acres) Zoning District. Location: 10280 Bluefield Road, on the east side of Bluefield Road, immediately adjacent to the terminus of Bluefield Road. 5D. Resolution No. 01-002/0uasi- Tudicial / Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution, subject to the cited conditions, granting a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Site Plan approval to allow for the construction of a 3,192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps and an automatic car wash in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. Location: Northeast corner of Miramar Avenue and Turnpike Feeder Road. 5E. Resolution No. 01-004/0uasi- Tudicial I Fort Pierce Air Center - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport to allow for construction of 13,000 square feet of hangar space and 1,820 square feet of office space to an existing hangar for a total of 14,820 square feet of space. Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport SF. Resolution No. 01-003/0uasi-ludicial / Miami Latin Church of God - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in zoning from the AR-l (Agriculture, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District to allow for the establishment of a church facility. Location: 5905 Oleander Avenue, on the west side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 100 feet south of Ulrich Road. End of Public Hearings ..... -...I REGULAR AGENDA JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE THREE 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Donation Agreement / Rock Road Jail - Consider staff recommendation to accept the donation of the building subject to the terms and conditions of the Donation Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. B. Twin Vee Powercats, Inc. Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. C. Resolution No. 01-34 / Rouse Road - Consider staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 01-34. '-' ...., CONSENT AGENDA Tanuarv 9. 2001 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 12 through No. 14 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Road & Bridge / Bid Waiver and Purchase - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver and purchase of a Hot Patch truck from Freightliner of South Florida in the amount of $87,316.74. 0,1) Engineering / Bid No. 00-096/ Administration Building Annex Parking Lot Drainage Improvements - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Johnson-Davis, Inc., in the amount of $103,040, establish the project budget as outlined, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 3. PURCHASING A. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permlsslOn to advertise for bids for the sale of the Yale EW Electric Overhead 10-ton Hoist. B. Bid No. 01-006 / Enhanced Swale Maintenance - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, CEM Enterprises, Inc. DBA Sunshine Painting, in the amount of $6.77 per foot for swale maintenance and $2.00 per foot for culvert cleaning, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. C. Bid No. 01-061 / Rouse Road Reconstruction - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Sheltra & Sons, in the amount of $51,380 (alternate bid amount), and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 4. UTILITIES Permission to Advertise / Transfer of Beach Club Colony Wastewater System to St. Lucie County from Martin County - Consider staff recommendation to grant the request for permission to advertise a public hearing, consistent with Florida Statute Chapter 125.3401, and schedule the Public Hearing for February 13, 2001 at 9:00 AM, or as soon thereafter as possible 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Change Order NO.2 and NO.3 / World of Plastics / Oleander Business Park CDBG Grant Project - Consider staff recommendation to execute the Change Orders for time extensions on work previously completed and to ensure that all grant paperwork is in compliance with state and federal regulations. '- ...., CONSENT AGENDA JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE TWO 6. ADMINISTRATION Community Development Block Grant Citizen's Advisory Task Force - Consider staff recommendation to ratify Commissioner Bruhn's appointment of Clyde Killer to the Community Development Block Grant Citizen's Advisory Task Force. 7. CENTRAL SERVICES RFP No. 00-097 / Architectural Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the two (2) firms, Edlund & Dreitenbas and REG Architects, and enter into a contract for two (2) years with an option of two (2) - one (1) year extensions. 8. COMMUNITY SERVICES Treasure Coast Community Services Tripartite Board for the St. Lucie / Martin / Okeechobee County Community Action Agency Re-appointments - Consider staff recommendation to Re-appoint Commissioner Paula Lewis or a designated staff person, and re-appoint Grace McNeil, retired manager of the welfare department, each to serve for another 3-year term. ........ ...., _ _...-;.. ._or .. . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: December 19, 2000 Tape: 1-2 Convened: 7:00 p.m. Adjourned: 9:30 p,m. Commissioners Present: Chair, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Paula A, Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Cliff Barnes Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Anita Neal, Agriculture Director, Dennis Wetzel, IT Director, Hank DuFour, Human Resources Director, Marie Gouin, M & B Manager, Pete Keogh, Leisure Services Director, Don Cole Acquisitions Manager, Sonya Smith, Public Information Officer, Don West, County Engineer, Paul Hiott, Veterans Services Manager, Becky Padrick, MSBU Coordinator, Deputy Williams, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-024) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held December 12, 2000; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATJONS/PRESENT ATJON(I-0244) A. Resolution No. 00-286- Proclaiming the week of December 19, 2000 through December 26,2000 as "Audubon Bird Count Week" in St. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-286; and, upon roIl call, motion carried unanimously. B. Agriculture/Christmas Remembrances- The 4-H Group presented gifts to the County Commission C. Jerome Rhyant ofthe Love Center Regeneration Ministries, Inc., addressed the Board requesting funding, Com. Barnes requested interpretation of the memorandum received from the Sheriffs office. The County Attorney stated, the memorandum indicated that in his opinion under the law, a program for drug abuse prevention such as the Love Center Regeneration is not aIlowed . However, it is his opinion that the Sheriff has to approve or certify funding or program funding before the Board can authorize payment. The Board cannot on it's own appropriate money to a particular program. -1- '-' -wi .-~ ",O.1S" However, it appears to him that if the memorandum states the program is not permitted under the law, this is not ac.urate. The law clearly authorizes the use of these funds for drug prevention programs and provides for a process for agencies or organizations that provide these programs can apply to the Sheriff or Chief of Police for an appropriation. It requires for 15% of the proceeds be utilized for drug prevention, crime prevention, school resource officers programs etc. The Board may not over-ride the Sheriffs decision not to fund this program ifhe does not want to. However, ifthey are saying it is not legal to appropriate the funds that is different. It is a legal expenditure, however it is clearly the discretion of the Sheriff if it is an apprqpriate expenditure. The funds are not to be used for normal operating expenses. Com. Coward stated he had a conversation with the Sheriff-elect on this issue and his answer was that he felt it was not lawful. If they do not want to fund it, that is a different story, however, if they are saying it is illegal, and legally it is, it should be pursued further. It is back to the same issue this year, we had a difficult budget year and turned away over $200,000 of requests from other agencies and he is having a difficult time with the way this is going forward. Where we had a difficult budget process this past year and we will be having another difficult one this coming year. He also stated his concern that this would open the county up to other groups coming in on an individual basis as well after the budget process requesting assistance. Com. Coward advised the Board that ifhe is asked to make a decision tonight, it would be a "no" from the General Fund. Ifhe is asked to continue to try and work with the Sheriff to see if we can interpret their position, i.e. to clarify their position regarding those funds, then he is 110% in favor, Com. Barnes stated he concurred with Com. Coward however, he still felt that they should exhaust any possible means of obtaining some ofthose funds and would like a meeting with the incoming Sheriff and Mr. Rhyant to take place to see if something can be worked out. The Board cannot expend any ofthose funds without the Sheriffs approval. Mr. Rhyant stated he would commit to setting up the meeting with the incoming Sheriff and requested that a Board member commit him or herself to attend the meeting also. Com. Barnes stated he would attend the meeting. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Robert Anderson, Indrio Road resident, addressed the Beach re-nourishment project. Mr. Samuel Duram, PSL High School Student, addressed the Board regarding passing an Ordinance where tobacco products are to be moved behind the counter or 4 feet away from the counter to make it harder for shop lifters and minors to access them. 4. CONSENT AGENDA (1-1588) It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the Consent Agenda to include Additions A- I.; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. I. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. I 1. -2- 12/15/00 FZABwARR FUND 001 001122 001124 001128 001130 001238 001252 001256 001807 101 101001 101002 101003 101006 102 102001 104 105 107 107002 121 140 140001 140121 140310 160 183 183001 183002 183004 184202 185001 186 186204 242 304 305 316 316001 362 382 393 401 401220 418 421 441 451 461 471 491 501 505 505001 510 611 625 ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #11- 09-DEC-2000 TO 15-DEC-2000 FUND SUMMARY ,-,,,·to ~~ TITLE General Fund CDBG--Yorld of Plastics FTA USC SectiQP 8307 FY 99/00. Section 112/MPO/FHYA/Planning FYOl TC Community Action Agency FYOO/Ol OTTE-Rail Spur Magnum Environmental Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant CTD TRIP Grant FY 00/01 Floridian Aquifer Yell Monitoring Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Grants & Donations Fund Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Blakely Subdivision Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund FAA Taxiway A-3, Airfield Signage Airfield Signage #408784-1-94-01 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Ft Pierce Inlet Mgmt Implementation SHIP Housing Assistance FY 00/01 Recycling Operating Fund Recycling & Education Grant FYOO/Ol Port I&S Fund Communication System Fund Beach Acquisition Fund County Capital Transportation Capital Sports Complex Improv Fund Environmental Land Capital Fund Westglen MSBU Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Litter Control & Prevention FYOO/Ol Golf Course Fund H.E.Y. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund Holiday Pines Utilities Fund Building Code Fund . Information Technology Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Service Garage Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: '- ...._-._,~.... EXPENSES 312,851.55 34,986.00 3.37 804.62 2,610.29 5,819.00 10.85 19,910.56 10.85 29,920.98 139,652.28 14,360.40 43,540.00 1,650.00 18,918.72 7,999.00 74,208.56 1,285.75 302,876.46 34,328.36 65.41 8,177.54 58.33 44,140.70 4,904.52 1,172.91 417.34 11. 86 150.00 532.37 4,743.03 14,931. 69 3,109.12 3,024.63 210,126.28 295.30 2,520.00 1,935.00 1,430.00 26,042.45 5,410.00 4,591.66 5,248.44 3,041. 76 17,117.04 1.56 16,481.01 18.42 13,602.82 50.09 479.41 158,327.02 212,956.16 15.05 29,399.30 4,338.67 15,532.91 1,860,147.40 .;c;:'",:"" ""'" . PAGE 1 PAYROLL 23,044.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,517.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,561.42 .'" '-' -' . .. _..t. .4" Á' 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. River Park Water Quality Improvement Project- The Board approved the Engineering Work Authorization for BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., to design baffle boxes to improve the quality of stormwater runoff discharging from the River Park subdivision in the amount of$26, 270.40, approved the project budget and authorized the Chairman to execute the contract. B. King Orange 2 MSBU and Skylark 2 MSBU- The Board approved the InterIocal Agreements with FPUA and the City ofFt. Pierce to provide potable water to King Orange Drive and Skylark Drive, and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreements. C. Ing Orange 2 MSBU and Skylark 2 MSBU- The Board approved the InterIocal Agreements with the Property Appraiser and Tax Collector and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreements. D. Road & Bridge/Sod Contracts- The Board approved the contract amendments as prepared by the County Attorney with Jose A. Gonzales d.b.a. T & J Sod Transport & Installation, Nature's Keeper, Inc., and Tri Brother's Tree & Landscaping, Inc" to increase the contract from $9,999 to $25,000 for each sod installation contract and authorized the Chairman to sign the amendments. E. Work Authorization No, 9/ Orange Avenue over Header Canal Bridge Replacernent- The Board approved the work authorization with KimIey- Horn and Associates, Inc., for engineering services to provide plans and specifications in the amount of $13,800 and authorized the Chairman to sign the authorization. F. Work Authorization No. IO/53rd Street Bridge over Canal C-25- The Board approved the work authorization ror thc scope and fee proposal submitted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for engineering services to provide plans and specifications in the amount of$13,800 and authorized the Chairman to sign the authorizations. G. Road and Bridge/Equipment Purchase- The Board approved Equipment Request No. EQOI-223 for the purchase of a Raised Pavement Marker Applicator from S,T.E. Inc., in the amount of $3,795 for use in the Traffic Operations Section. 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY A, Permission to Advertise/Petition to AbandonlDixieland SID Unrecorded Plat- The Board approved advertising a Public Hearing to be held on January 16,2001 at 9:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. B. Revocable License Agreement/Cherokee Street- The Board approved the Revocable License Agreement authorized the Chairman to execute the agreement and instruct Range Construction Industries, Inc., to record the Agreement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. C. Agreement Extension- The Board approved the Second Extension Agreement with R & R Corporate Systems, Inc., for Janitorial Services and authorized the Chairman to sign the extension. D. Resolution No. 00-288/Rouse Road MSBU- Hendren Right of Way Parcel- The Board -3- ..... -...I approved acceptipg.the Hetìdten Deed, -authorized the Chairman to execute Resolution No. 00-288 and directed staffto record the documents in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 4. PURCHASING, . A. Bid Waiver and Sole Source Purchase- The Board approved the request for a bid waiver and sole source purchase to RAD Data Communications for a Optimux-XLTI Multiplexer in the amount of$I3,800. B. Bid No. 00-084- The Board approved awarding the bid for the purchase of two integrated tool carrier loaders to the low bidder Coastline Equipment Co. , in the amount of $197,720. 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. MPO's Transit Development Plan Consultant Services Contract- The Board approved the request to advertise the Request for Proposals for the Transit Development Plan. B. Permission to advertise- The Board approved advertising an RFP for the FFY 2001 Community Development Grant applications for Grant Planning and Writing and lor Grant Administration in the Economic Development category. C. AAA Cooper Replat- The Board approved the final plat for the subdivision to be known as A.AA Cooper - Replat and authorized staffto proceed with its final processing. D. Oleander Pines Replat- The Board approved the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Oleander Pines- Replat and authorized staffto proceed with its final processing. E. Yorkridge Plat- The Board approved the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Y orkridge Plat, and authorized staff to proceed with its final processing. 6. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Bid Waiver and Award from Quotations- The Board approved the bid waiver and awarded from quotations to Ramey Rug Carpet One in the amount of$16,287.31 for replacement carpet for the Mets Locker Room & Office/Weight Room and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney, B. Bid No 01-004-/South 25th St. Bridge over Ten Mile Creek Bridge Repair- The Board approved awarding the bid to the second lowest bidder, CEM Enterprise, Inc., in the amount of$97,302, establish the project budget and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. C. Change Order No. I Orange Avenue at C-24 Bridge Replacement- The Board approved the change order in the deductive amount of($-40,518.02) resulting in a total contract amount of$I,038,406.98, accepted the project, released retainage in the amount of $107,892.50, and make final payment to Johnson Davis, Inc., in the amount of $67,179.48. D, Keen Road Bridge Replacement Project- The Board approved the award of an additional $ I 5,000 for geotechnical engineering testing services and construction management services to Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing to complete the project. 7. LEISURE SERVICES Ilous Ellis Memorial Park (open space) Baseball Lighting- The Board approved piggy- backing offthe City of Jacksonville's Contract No. SC 0463-00 with Musco Lighting for the -4- "'" '-....I needed improvements, anclauthorize-d the Chair to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 8, AGRICULTURE .. . Mileage Reimbursement- The Board approved the establishment of a set mileage reimbursement for the Extension Director at $300 month and Agents, the Horticulture Specialist and one Program Assistant at $225 month to be paid on a monthly basis effective January I, 200 I. 9. ADMINISTRATION Committee Appointments- The Board ratified Commissioner Brulm's appointments of Russell Aikens to serve on the Planning & Zoning Commission and Stix Nixon to 'serve on the Board of Adjustment. ADDITIONS A-I. Resolution No. 00-289 and Resolution No. 00-290- The Board approved adopting the resolutions as drafted, amending Administrative Fee for Grants, Special Dependent Districts and Enterprise Funds. REGULAR AGENDA(I -1794) 5. PUBLIC WORKS A. Resolution No. 00-004- South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Assessment District- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to adopt the resolution stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments for the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Assessment District. Mr. Charles Trowbridge, Las Olas resident, addressed the Board regarding this project and stated he felt he had no advantage to the beach and he could not see paying to ruin the ecology on the beach by bringing in the sand. He does not agree with the residents being asked to pay a special tax to place sand on the beach so that all the residents may utilize it. He suggested the whole county be taxed. Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island resident addressed the Board regarding the fact this was the first time he had seen Resolution No. 00-004 for the special assessment district. He reminded the Board that when the beach erosion problems were fixed in Ft. Pierce as they have been fixed repeatedly, that has been done through the Erosion District E- which recognizes the beach is a feature for the entire county and this is a county wide annual assessment. These funds are currently being utilized for the South Beach Jetty area. There is plenty of money left in that account and they have been talking with staff and the State Senator to get funds re-directed. He hopes the county is not looking to set a special assessment for the islanders in the area to pay for the entire beach in that area. The MSBU Coordinator requested the County Attorney explain to Mr. Grande why they are requesting to preserve the option. The County Attorney explained the special assessment. Mr. Grande stated he understood, however, what he was questioning was the special assessment district which never came up in his discussions with staff. -5- "'-' -...I The County Attorney explí)inecL tl1èi'eason for the request. Mr. Grande respectfully requested Resolution No.OO-275 for the MSBU be passed and that Resolution No. 00-004 be either defeated or postponed. He would like to get more information on the special assessm~nt district. The County Administrator advised the Board of the time limits for this procedure. Com. Barnes reiterated that this is only preserving the option and it might be necessary in the future and without preserving the option it could not go forward. Mr. Robert Lloyd, Attorney, on behalf of Mr. Roger Toffolon, property owner in the area. Mr. Toffolon would like to go on record as objecting to having his property included in the proposed district. The erosion problem is south ofMr, Toffolon's property. . Mr. Lloyd requested Mr. Toffolon's property be removed from boundaries of the proposed district and submitted the attached letter for the record including the handwritten corrections made by Mr. Lloyd. Mr. Grande, Hutchinson Island resident, stated the narrows are the most fragile part of the island and they are subject to the same erosion and these properties (the narrows) should not be exc1uded at this time. Mr. Robert Anderson, Indrio Road resident, stated he felt he should not be expected to pay for the project since he does not live on the island and felt that no one who is subject to this erosion should be excluded. Mr. Trowbridge once again addressed the Board on this project and stated this tax district should be paid by the entire county and then should be narrowed later if necessary. He suggested the Board vote against the district. Mr. Ed McKay, Hutchinson Island resident, addressed the Board regarding Mr. Toffolon's property and requested it not be excluded. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Resolution No. 00-285- Briargate MSBU/2nd Public Hearing- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to consider adopting the resolution to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Briargate MSBU, approve the preliminary assessment roll and authorize the County Engineer to proceed with construction of the project. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. C. Resolution No. 00-284- Rouse Road MSBU/ 2nd Public Hearing- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to consider the comments of the property owners before adopting the resolution to levy a non- ad valorem special assessment on the Rouse Road MSBU approving the assessment roll, and to authorize the County Engineer to proceed with construction ofthe project. The MSBU Coordinator explained the two boundaries ofthis MSBU. She also advised the Board of one property owner who had written a letter to her stating he was no longer interested in participating in the project. Mr. Robert Anderson, Indrio Road resident questioned if the project was for pavement or ifit included water and sewer. -6- ~ 'j ....... ...,J) Ro BERT M. LLOYD ,. ..' ATTORNEY AT L.AW THE FORT PIERCE HOTEL BUILDING _rI':' ",..- . 200 SOUTH INDIAN RIVER DRIVE. SUITE 301 FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34950 December 19,2000 MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. BOX J 2009 FORT PIERCE, FL 34979.2009 TELEPHONE (56!) 461-2844 FAX (561) 461-6119 .. . VIA TELEFAX 462-2131 Commissioner John Bruhn 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Commissioner Doug Coward 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Commissioner Paula I$wis 2300 Virginia A venue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Commissioner Cliff Barnes 2300 Virginia A venue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 RE: 1.- J}.I'¿/' Resolution No. 00-004 AI-'D f-[..SOi.-V17¿,jJ pD, 66~ '75 ' 5,300 feet, more or less, of ocean frontage property located in Section 27, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, (South of Nuclear Power Plant and North of Island Dunes Condominium) Parcelldentitication Numbers: 3527-122-00 I 1-000/2; 3527-123-0002-000/9; 3527-131-0001-000/7; 3527-112-0001-000/8; 3527-123-0003-000/6; 3527-132- 0001-000/0; and 3527-421-0001-000/7 This office represents Roger 1. Toffolon, who has owned the referenced property for more than 25 years. This morning I learned from an article in a local newspaper that the Board of Commissioners of the St. Lucie County Erosion District anticipates inclusion of the referenced property in a special assessment district designed to fund the cost of beach restoration improvements to properties within the district. It is my understanding that the reason for creation of the district is because of erosion that recently occurred in the extreme southern portion of St. Lucie County on South Hutchinson Island. ,,,. ........¥-... '1/ ('" ~'II'.:"". . . .UI' / """ -...I December 19,2000 Page Two _'0<:' .h' ... P-1f)bP- bf /ll.;!-D MAifrfLtlrt-/trò/l-Afb<>"'r Tift- tl'pJ!.. òP JoiJ þ,f-)fiJ/ HistoricalIy, Mr. TOfftn'S property has not been subject to erosion because of various factors, including a protective øff31H:JIC ,a:.:.f; the existence and effect of which has hecn previously documcnted by a rcspected coastal engineer. Accordingly, beach restoration is not required or needeá for this property. , In view of the foregoing, it is clear that Mr. Toffolon's property will not derive any benefit tram the proposed beach restoration improvements and, therefore, this property should not be included within the boundaries of the proposcd district. Due to prior commitments, I may not be able to attend the public hearing scheduled for 7:00 p.m. this evening. In any event, please make this letter part of the record of the public hearing on the referenced resolution. RespectfulIy, ~:4N Robert M. Lloyd RMLlsec ROBERT M. LLOYD, ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 12009. FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34979-2009 . ......,.~~._,_. .. ~ . , .Ji;''':',I..... . '-' ...., Mr. Anderson was advis~d.that it· was for paving and drainage. Mr. Jerry Vassell, addressed the Board regarding the fact that he does not support the project due to the cost. He is the owner of the mobile home park which has 65 units. .. . Com. Barnes stated he felt it was too late to pull the plug on this project and stated his reasons for feeling this way. Mr. Vassell was the originator of the project several years ago and the majority of the people Com. Barnes has spoken with were enthusiastic about the project. Mr. BiTT Theiss, Mayor of St. Lucie Village, addressed the Board and advised them that his Board requested he urge the County Commission to move ahead with the project. Ms. Amy Wright, Rouse Road resident, addressed the Board in favor of the projec!. Mr. Robert Anderson questioned why his area was not included in the poll of residents for the project for water and sewer. Com. Coward advised Mr. Anderson that his comments were not pertaining to what the issue was tonight. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-284; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. D. Resolution No. 00-275/South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration MSBU- Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non- ad valorem special assessments for the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration MSBU. Mr. Lloyd wished his prior comments be incorporated with respect to this resolution, and requested his clients property not be included in the district. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY(2-963) A. Resolution No. 00-257lResolution No- 00-258- Consider staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 00-257 repealing Resolution No. 73-137 as amended and abolishing the Board of Governors, and adopt Resolution 00-258 creating the Technology Committee and providing for duties and functions ofthe committee. Com. Bruhn stated his opposition to another committee being formed. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn; Aye's: Barnes, Lewis, Coward, Hutchinson, motion carried by a vote of 4 to I. B. Pursuit Boats (52 Yachts) Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. It was moved by Com, Bames, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. C. Mirabella Yachts Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Jon Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. -7- ~ ~ ...., . . -.go.:, ~.,... It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve staff recormnendation; and upon roll call, motion c\rried unanimously. , 7, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT(2_1226) Resolution No. 00-139- Crimson North Group Limited- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting Major Site Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval for the 10-lot residential subdivision project to be known as Anacostia SID . It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recormnendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. NON AGENDAD ITEMS Com. Lewis requested the Board ratifY her appointment of Michael Bausher to the Library Board. Com. Bruhn also requested the Board ratify his appointment of Jerry Rosier to the Historical Commission. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to ratify the appointments as stated; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 8. ADMINISTRATION Commissioner Hutchinson requested discussion on alternating trips to Tallahassee during the Legislative Session, The Board members discussed their availability during the upcoming months. Com. Bruhn stated he would available the second week in February, The County Administrator advised the Board that he would be meeting with the Lobbyist and get back to the Board with the results. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court -8- ...... AGENDA REOUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration SUBJECT: Service Awards 1-P't M NO. --L- DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR [ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: BOCC Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson, St. Lucie County BOCC Chairman BACKGROUND: The following individuals are no longer able to serve on the St. committees listed, due to expiring term limits: Eddie Whitfield (Barnes) 8 years of service Todd Bevan (Lewis) Walter Deemer (Barnes) 5 years of service 5 years of service FUNDS AVAILABLE: NjA PREVIOUS ACTION: NjA Lucie County Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council Investment Committee Investment Committee RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board honor these individuals by presenting an award recognizing their many years of service. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [¡g OTHER: Awards Presented Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget originating Dept. Other: Purchasing: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eft. 5/96 "'" AGENDA REQUEST -....I ITEM NO. SA TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [ PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: King's Highway Industrial Park - Street Lighting District Public Hearing BACKGROUND: See Attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: December 12, 2000 - Board granted permission to advertise Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of Resolution No. 00-287, Providing for the Creation and Establishment of a Special Street Lighting Improvement District in the King's Highway Industrial Park and authorize the Chairman and County Attorney to execute the resolution. COMMISSION ACTION: D glas M. Anderson ounty Administrator þc] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: "'~"'" m"rnw' ~ [XJpublic works Dir: [X]Finance Dir'~ Coordi nation/Sianatures [X]Mgmt & BUdget~'-trI(fF31 [X]Co Eng, ~ []Other: (] Purchasing: [] Other: ____ /_,J "';/v /'] /-? J).--/ /71,/)/ '-' ...., COMMISSION REVIEW: ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 00-432 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners County Engineer December 27,2000 King's Highway Industrial Park - Proposed Street Lighting District Public Hearing BACKGROUND Staff has received a petition representing 74% of the property owners within the King's Highway Industrial Park to create a street lighting district to provide street lighting by FPL. The King's Highway Industrial Park is comprised of 97 industrial lots. The petitioner's signatures have been verified and the limits of the proposed district are depicted in the attachments. This petition far exceeds the fifteen (15%) percent concurrence as required by County Ordinance. A general election is required pursuant to the Ordinance unless the petition represents at least 51 % in favor of the improvements. We have a majority in support of the project, therefore will recommend waiving the election which would save the property owners $1,000.00. This system would be comprised of twenty-one (21) Traditional Luminaires and necessary poles. FPL will require a one-time deposit of $1 ,004.00 and $9,171 for the construction of the improvements. Per FPL's Street Lighting Tariff, the monthly charges for this system will be approximately $502.00. This equates to approximately $70.00 per lot per year. Staff proposes to borrow funds from the general revenue fund as a means to upfront the costs associated with creating the street lighting district. According to Section 1-17-21, Code of Ordinances, the Board is authorized to appropriate monies from the general fund to upfront the costs necessary for the purpose of starting a street lighting district. All funds advanced will be repaid to the general fund from the funds collected on the tax roll. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Board approval of Resolution No. 00-287, Providing for the Creation and Establishment of a Special Street Lighting Improvement District in the King's Highway Industrial Park and authorize the Chairman and County Attorney to execute the resolution. cc: Staff Concurring Tax Collector Property Appraiser g\wplstlightlkingshwylaga-ph1.wpd '-" ~ RESOLUTION NO. 00-287 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPECIAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT AND THE LEVY OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR KINGS HIGHWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT TO BE DESIGNATED AS "SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 128 OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA" WHEREAS' the Board of County Commissioners of SI. Lucie County has made the following determinations: 1. On October 23, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners was presented with a petition pursuant to Section 1-17-17 of the Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws of SI. Lucie County, Florida, requesting the creation of a special street lighting improvements district composed of the area within the hereinafter described boundaries. 2. On December 12, 2000, the County Engineer filed with the Board a report setting forth that there are ninety-seven (97) lots within the boundaries of the proposed district and that the owners of seventy-two (72) lots had signed the petition as verified through Property Appraiser records. 3. The County Administrator has made or caused to be made such surveys and investigations as he deemed necessary and on December 12, 2000, the County Engineer filed with the Board his report setting forth (a) the boundaries of the proposed District, (b) the location of any improvements to be acquired, leased, or installed, (c) his estimate of the cost of such improvements, and (d) his estimate of the annual expense of operating such improvements and of providing such special services. 4. This Board determined from the report of the County Engineer that the improvements and services petitioned for would be of special benefit to all real property -1- '-' -...I within the proposed district and that the cost of providing such improvements and special services would not be in excess of such special benefits, and accordingly, set a public hearing to be held at the St. Lucie County Administration Annex in Fort Pierce, Florida on Tuesday, January 9, 2001 at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, and notice of said public hearing was published in the Tribune at Fort Pierce, Florida, on December 19, 2000. 5. Following the above-referenced public hearing, this Board has determined that the petition as submitted for the creation of a special street lighting improvements district and the levy of special assessments for the Kings Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District should be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida as follows: 1. That a special street lighting improvement district is hereby provided, for the creation and establishment under authority of Article II of Chapter 1-17 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, as amended, to be designated as "SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 128 OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA", 2. That the boundaries of said District is as follows: Kings Highway Industrial Park Unit One, Block A, Lots 1 thru 16, Block B, Lots 1 thru 10, Block C, Lots 1 thru 9, and Block D, Lots 1 thru 13, as described in Plat Book 26, Page 16, and Kings Highway Industrial Park Unit Two, Block A, Lots 17 thru 47, and Block B, Lots 11 thru 28, as described in Plat Book 32, Page 5 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. -2- '-' '-....I 3. That the special services to be provided in said district are street lights. 4. That twenty-one (21) Traditional Luminaires and necessary poles and underground cable will be installed by lease agreement with Florida Power & Light Company in said district with a deposit in the amount of one-thousand four dollars ($1,004.00). The estimated total annual cost for service, including energy, maintenance and relamping, will be six thousand twenty four dollars ($6,024.00). 5. Said annual cost of service will be financed by the levy of special assessments on all taxable real property in the district on a per lot basis not to exceed twenty five thousand seven hundred five dollars ($25,705.00) annually for the first year's assessment and six thousand seven hundred ninety dollars ($6,790.00) annually per year thereafter until such time that the annual assessment will need to be adjusted accordingly to Florida Power & Light Company's monthly rate of billing. 6. That given the fact that the parties which petitioned for the creation of the district equates to a majority of the property owners in the district, and it is apparent, therefore, that an election among the affected property owners to determine whether to create the district would result in an affirmative vote for the creation of the district, it would appear an unnecessary expenditure of monies to conduct an election regarding the creation of the district as provided under Section 1-17 -17(f) of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws. Therefore, this Board has determined that such an election will not be required to create the Kings Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District. 7. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. -3- '-' ....; After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson Vice-Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 2001. ATTEST: BY: Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY CONßflSffiONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney -4- IDwG'S IDGHW A Y INDUSTRlAboPARK STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT SEE SHE( T 1.:5/ .J5N I , I \'....¡.t~l I'V".1 ,... ---1~---~-------------------------------------------___________;_ I fJJJ-(}()()C{)IO/SJ CN>lN.. C ~ 25 ~ t, ~-----l-----------------------1f~~-jf:----______________------------------------------------------------------____---------35 36-- "2/'1c- ,~I 8 l." .', ,; z . ~ u ,~ o. " ~ ~ ~ " ~. ª ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ -, -----.-' --- ----- . 7J~ . c " '~3 I»a.oo Y.35 S. . -.. . SEE SHEET 23/02N . . . ~ - ~" ~ ;:: <i .; ! i41(HXt)()-()OO/1) Jì~5ð Ac: I I I I I .1 . ~ 1 I I I (44J<XJOHJOO/OJ 3"" 1 I. I I - I ~ I I uZJœ I 1.1! 1 I 1 1 1M I I", I~ i1 I~ . '~ i I", i~ 1 1 M ~I "'I 1 1 I I I . I ~ I I 1 1 . - . ------.---, '" .~_.- - ..~ 'II'J'O . - r-o--... - - A $1. ~\W~~~ ~@\WlNln, n@WJ~@~ SHE[ PR£PAROJfCR ~~ ¥.>/.~ ASSESSMENr MAP SECTION S 1/a Of 35 Im.-"'~~'''~'''''¡t'¡'r TOWNSHIP M S. /'" SOl . IIOT SARLTAEf iliAC T. T. J TY fUI'IIA1 ........ ...... ~ II£ÏiI[Jijell\W æ (It Q,I~I(IIS RANGE ~ E. ST. LŒI£ aum f'IØ'IJITJ IIf'I'III4tsot "... .... t) ã: t;¡ ë CJ z w ¡:: .... w :¡: .. e CJ .... e ::::¡ ~ <.> 0. .... Ñ w <.> w rr « .... '" ~ " c rr z « 0 a. ¡:: '" oJ ¡¡¡ '" '" « z w ã: ::; a: a. ;;¡ e t;¡ :; e ::> .. c 3!: > ~ :¡: CJ ;: ¡: a: '" a: w CJ w z Z 0. ~ 0 52 a: 0 0. s 9 u. '" 0 .... ó z z :> e z w 0 z E '" .... ¡¡; W 0. ...... ...., z o ;;! ¡¡: '" ¡¡: w <.> -' '" w o ~~~~~~~~~~ q~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ g~~e£~~s££o~N~vøø~££BBe£Beoe88eee~~e~888~~88e ri~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~~~ ~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ,,"" , "".""""."""""",."", "" , wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 ~~~~~~~~~cccccccccccccccccccccccc~~~~~~~~~~~~ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~¥~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0OOoooooooooooooooooo~0000~0000000000oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ OCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCOCCCCOOCDDDCCCCCCOOC ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~ >rrr»»r>r»»»»>r»»>r»»»r»>r»r»>r <~~~«<~~~«««««««««««««««««< ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~rIxx~xxxrrrrrrxxrrrrrrxrrr~~rrrrrrrrrxrrrrrr øøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøØôôøøøøøøøøøØôøø %xrrrrr%%%%rrrrrrrrÏÏrrrIrrrrrrÏÏÏrrrIxÏÏÏÏrÏ 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2~~~222222222~222~2~22222 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~----~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~_~ov~m _____________~~M~~~ - ~~~~----------~ ~v~o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~MM~~~~ ~ ~ð~~~~~~~~~~~~- ~-_~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!!!!!~j~~i!!iiiiiii~~~~~ii~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~rr~~~~ ~ rr ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~uuwww~ ~ uo ~~~~~~~~~ wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww~~üüuw ~~~~ wwwrrwrww Uoouuouoooooooooomm~~~o~ > _mm uUUuuUuuu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~«000oo~~~~ffi«<~««<~~~mm~m~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ oooooooooooooooooaaQooo~~oßoo~~~~~~~ooow>wowoo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooOO~~~~~~~~~~r~~~ >~>~~ ~t;t; !: ~I.UW 0 wwww~~w~~ ~ ~~ ~ww »»xx--- ~ - rr~~~~~~~ ~» CQOQcccccoooo««~~gggo r~ ~~OOCCCOOOCC 0 z« ~~~~~~~~~~~~~WWWW«~~~~>0~ <~rrIIrIr~~~ ~ oww oooooooooooooØØØØffiffi~~~o~>~~ffiffiuuoouuuooo~~oQôø ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~QQ0oooo~~~~~QC~~~~~~~~~~~w~~~~ CQOOOODOCCCOOŒŒŒŒWW~~~Q<w~xwwmmmmmmmoCOXXXOŒ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~oOOO~~000000~~0mg~~OOOOOOOO000oo~~~g~g~oo eóóóóóeóóóóee~~~~--888e~~~o~~~~~~~~~eeeooo~~~ aÆÆÆÆÆaÆÆÆÆaaæææm~~~~~aN~_~~~~~~~~~~aaa~~~_~~ uuuuuuuuuuuu ~~~u ~~~~~~~uuu ~~~~~~~~~~~~ u ~g~~ ~Æææ~ŒŒ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ z ouu~u r zzzz~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~OO~~~~~~g uutt[~ŒŒŒ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~oo-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ «««<~~~~~ æoooozzz<~~~-000~~~~~~~«< ~ ~æææææ~æææ~ææ ~~~;~~æwwø8~~~~~~~~~æææ ~ ~~~t;t;t;t;~~~~~~ w~~rr>t;~~Q~~~~~~~ŒŒŒ~t;~ ~~ø >~~~~~~~~~~~~"",,~0000~~~~OOO-a:W000000000~~~ ~rx ~QDDDQOCCCOCc~~~z~~~~~QW~ ~~~~~~~~ŒŒCQQ W~ ~zzzzzzzzzzZZ~~~wQQ~~wz>w~~QQ~~~~~~~zzz~~~<wfu ~------------~~~~ZZ~~Œ-Z>~~ZZ~2~~~~~---<~~roo~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~999~~~zw~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~QQ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ZFF~~~~~~~ØFFIÏÏrrrr~~~~~~z~~ ~ØØØØØØØØØØØØ~~~~~~~~~øz~3~~~~~~~~~~ØØØ~~~Q~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~&&~~55~~~~8~~~55~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ij~~ij~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~!~!~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ijijijijijijijijijij~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ijij~~i~ ¥~~~~~¥~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~¥~~~~~ij¥~~~~~~~~~ 8888888888888888888§§88888888§§§§§§§8888§§§§§ o___~~______________~~~~~~~_______~_~~~~~~~__ -----------~ -~~~~~~~~~..._- t æ .... m Õ (:J z w ¡:: S w :>: Q (:J 0 :¡ ~ " 0. .... r:¡ w " w a:< ~~ ~c a:z <0 11._ ...d:: " "' "' :$~1!!: w a: 11. = a: Q .... '" Q m :. '" :::> c ~ >- < ;= :>: (:J :¡; ~ a: m a: w (:J w z Z 0. ;¡: 52 ~o 0. '-' ...., z o ;;! t: "'ã: w " ...I "' W Q û .. ~~~~~~~~~Ñ~~~~æ~~~g~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~æ~re ~rrr~rr~rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr OOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ~~~~b~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;;;;~;~;;;;;;;;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~mmm~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~tctttttttttcttttttctcctttttttcttttttttctt zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~æææ~~~~~~~æææææææ~ææææææææææŒææææææææææ~æææŒ~~~~~ææ~~ ««~««««««««««««««««««««««««< ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ««c««««««««««««««««««««««««< ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ oowww~øøoooooooowwwwwwwøøøwwwooøøwwwwøøøwwwwwwwwwoooooooooooooooooooooo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ QOOODOOOCCCQQCCCCCOOQQOOCCQCCCCCQQQCCCCCCCCQCCCQCCCOQC ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» ~~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~III~III~~~IIIIIIII~~IIII~~IIIII~IIIIIIIII~IIII~IIIIII ø~~~~øø~øøø~øøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøø~øøøøøøøø ~IIZ%III~~~IIIÏÏÏÏIIIrÏÏrrIÏrrrr~~IrrrIII~~~~~~rr~~rrr wwwwooooooooøøøoooooowwwoowwwwwwoowøoowwooøøøoowwwooooooooøoooooooooooooooooooooo øøø~~øøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøø zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ~~~~2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2~~2~~22~2222222~222222~~~222~~~2 MMM~~~~§§~~§~§~§§§§~~~~~~~~~~~~~I§§ ~~~NN~~~~~~~~~~.. .~~ --- -- ------------- ~----- ----..- M ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~o ~ ~~~ ~~ ,~~~~~~~~~~~~~, ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~i~~§§~~~~~m@mm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~§§æ ~~~~~~~MM~~gg@@@@@g~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ŒŒŒ~~~«~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__ ~~~~~ ~~~~ wwwwwwwøØww~~~~~~~~wwwwwwwwwwwww~~~ wwwww~~~~~~wwww~~ ~~~~~~~riri~~Æ~~~ÆÆ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Oó6 ~~~~~ _ _ _ _ _ _~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~>~~~»5>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~ ~~~~~~~~æ~~CQCCCCCC~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~ .~~~~~æææŒææ~~~~~O< ~~~~~~~~~~~ð~~ð~ððð~~~~~~~~~~~~~@~~~~~~~~«««~~~~~~~ ooooooo~~ooæææææææŒOOOOOOOOOOOQOW~~~QOQQO~~~~~~ooooQQ~ ~~~~~~~»~~mmmmmmmm~~~~~~~~~~~~~»>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooo~ ~~ ŒŒ ææ ææŒŒŒŒŒæ ~~ ~~ OQC~~CcQQQOOOCOCQOOOOCQCOOOC~~~~QOOÖÖ 0000 ~ ~ŒŒWW~Œ~~~~~~~~ŒŒææææŒæææææŒ~ææ<æææŒæ~~~~~~æŒææ I ~~~~oOOFFooæææææŒŒŒOOOOOOoooooooZWWIoooWW~~~~~~OOOO 0 ~~~~æææ«ææ~~~~~~~~æææææææææææææ~~~~æææ~~~~~~~~ææææ~~~ xxxxOQQQQOOooooooooQaOOOCQQOOOOQæ08~oooooXXXXXXaaaCIIm gggg~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~;;~o z~~;oogggggg;~~~~~~ ~~~~;;;~~;;~~~~~~~~;;;;;;;;;;;;;~~~~mmm~~~~~~~~;;;;~~~ 4 Øooøoooooo ~ 00 00 0000000000000 mooo ~wwwwwoooo I ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o~~~ ~~é~~~~~~~. ~ ææ ææ æææææææææææææ ~æææ ~~~~~~æææætt~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ OQP~~~ OOOOOO:~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~QQ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ù~~~ ffffff~~~~--o~ ---- «~~«OOQQOOoo«c««««« --2ccc ««~~ zzzzcææooooææ~~~~~~~~æææææææææææææ ~~~æææooFFF~FFææææ~~~ gggg2~~~~~~ooooooøøooooø~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~2w~~~~~~~ðððð~~~~QQŒ ~~~~>~~ww~~QQQQQQQQ~~~~~~~~~~~~~2~~m~~~øøgg~oooo~~~~~~~~ zzzz~aa~~aazZZZZZZZQCCCCCQacaaacz oooOzz"'" ,oaaczz 5555~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oG~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~æ~ 8888~~~~~~~bbbbbbbb~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~III~~II~~~~~~~~II~~II~IIIrIIwzzzIIIææ~~~2~~IIII--_ ~~~~ø~ø~~øoowwwwwwww~~øøøøø~oowøOOOO2WW~WWOO«IIIIIIooøoo~~~æ ~~~~~~~ææ~~~~~~~lli~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~æ~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~Œ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~mmmmmmmm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~22m~~~aa<~<c«~~~~~~oo s .. 5! "- "' 0 .... 0 z z ::> Q z W 0 Z ¡:: '" Iii ¡¡; 0. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ì~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~§~~!~~~i~~~~~~I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~¥¥~~~~~~~ ~~~~8~~~~8~~~~~~~88~~~~88~88888~~8~~~~~~~~~~888~~8~~~~ _~_~o____~_~~~~~~~~___~~___~~~~_________~___~~___~____ -------------~~--~-~~~-~ -~---- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Request '-' 5-(3 Item Number Date: '-' Jan. 9, 2001 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg, [ ] [ [ ] [X] Quasi-JD [ X ] Board of County Commissioners Community Development Director ~/ Presented By . {j J%uucL2 [ ommunity Development Director Consider request for continuance of the request of MAGI International Development Company for a Conditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan approval to allow for the construction of a 110,450 square foot mini-warehouse and self-storage facility to be known as Guardian Self Storage. (File No.: MJSp·00·007 and CU-00-009) At the December 5, 2000 public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners continued Ihe conditional use/major site plan project to be known as Guardian Self Storage to the January 9, 2001 public hearing. The reason for this continuance was to allow the applicant to review the project and attempt to make modifications to the site plan in order to preserve the existing trees located on the site. At this time, the applicant has been working towards a site plan which they hope will be satisfactory to the County as well as the client. The client is requesting a continuance to the January 23, 2001 public hearing in order 10 allow for sufficient review time of the proposed site plan. N/A The Board of County Commissioners at the December 5, 2000 public hearing, continued the proposed project to the January 9, 2001 public hearing. The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 1, with two members absent (Mr. lounds and Mr. McCurdy), recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit at its November 16, 2000 meeting. Slaff recommends approval of the continuance of the project to the January 23, 2001. COMMISSION ACTION: LiJ APPROVED 0 DENIED D OTHER Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originaling Dept.: Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND538a) "'" '-' COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: 01109/01 File Number MJSP-00-007 and CU-00-009 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: Board of County Commissioners Community Development Director DATE: January 2, 2001 SUBJECT: Request of MAGI International Development Company for a public hearing continuance to January 23, 2001 On December 27, 2000, Staff received a request by Mr. David Hayes, Kirnley Horn & Associates, requesting that the petition of MAGI International Development Company be continued to the January 23,2001, Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing (Copy Attached). According to Mr. Hayes, the applicant is working with their firm in order to address the issues raised by the Commissioners at the December 5, 2000 public hearing. At this time, the plans have not been finalized but the applicant has been making progress towards responding to the Commissioners' concerns. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: é< JtMc:l.J_ J la 1. Shewchuk, AICP ommunity Development Director cs cc: David Hayes, Kimley Horn & Associates MAGI International Development Company File '12/29/00 11:51 FAX 1 561 286 0138 ~=~ KIIILEY HORN """ ...¿ Kimley-Horn and Associales. Inc. Decembcr 29, 2000 St. Lucie Counly Attn: Cyndi Snay 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Piercc, FL 34982 FAX 561-462-1581 Re: Guardian Self Storage BOCC Sile Plan Approval Continuance RequcsI KHA ¡>roject No_ 046994001 Dear Ms. Snay: I respectfully request a continuance of our January 9 BOCC schedule Wltil the next available date. We are at the fInal stages of the revisions to the site plan showing some very positive prese¡vation. However; duc to the holidays and meeting team schedules aroWld them, we are regrettably unable to meet the nccessary time fÌamcs for the COWlty' s schedule for- pRC prior 10 Ihe Jan. 9 meeting, I anticipate having a very positive revised site plan before you within the ncxt couple of days. I may be contacted at 561-286-2190 for any questions regarding this site plan. Sincerely, lUMLEY-HORN ANµ ASSOCIATES, INC. David A. Hays Cc: Ed Timoney Kim Gaskell, MAGI Int"'ì'ational Development Co, S:\046\046994magÙOOl \ooms\BOCC Cont Request.doc . TEL 561 286 2190 FAX 561 WG ona 1li002 . Suile320 2400S.E. Federal Highway SIUar1,FIofida ,,,.. ....... ...., AGENDA ITEM 2: FILE NO. CU-OO-009 MAGI International Development Companv Ms. Snay presented the petition for MAGI International Development Company for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 110,450 square foot mini-warehouse and self-storage facility to be known as Guardian Self Storage, in the CG (Commercial General) Zoning District, for property is located on the West of U,S, Highway No. I, approximately 406 feet south of the Intersection of Port St. Lucie Boulevard and U.S. Highway No.1. Mr. Hays, Kimley & Home Associates, representing the applicant, presented the developer's petition, He explained that the information before the board is the plan for a proposed self- storage facility. Mr. Hays and his client have worked with staff on this plan. He and his client believe it to be in compliance with all the land development code conditions. In fact he believes that they probably even have done a better job in some areas, than others, It is consistent with the zoning district and compatible with the neighboring businesses. Chairman Matthes asked if there were any questions from the board to the petitioner. Mr. Grande asked if the access for the facility was a normal configuration. He does not see a deceleration lane. Mr. Hays replied in the affirmative. He explained that a couple of different options were reviewed with FDOT during the application conference. The options were storage lane/deceleration lane or vehicular storage on the side. The developer chose option 2 to allow for the appropriate vehicular storage on the site. That is why the proposed gate is over 100 feet back from the right of way line. Mr. Grande questioned the definition of "proper storage" in this scenario. Mr. Hays replied stacking vehicles before they reached the gate. Mr. Grande asked staff if the entrance is off the normal right hand lane of U.S. Highway No.1 and whether a deceleration lane is required. Ms. Snay replied that their gate is over 100 feet away right of way and the code requires fifty feet. Mr. Grande stated that cars traveling at the standard speed of U.S. Highway No.1 speed limits will be decelerating to make this right turn in a regular traffic lane. Ms. Snay replied in the affirmative and added that FDOT approved this plan. Mr. Hays stated that he would like to explain it a little further. This is not the only business on this road that will not or does not have a deceleration lane. There are requirements and they have all been met. Mr. Grande stated he understands what Mr. Hays is saying and the reason for the gate. His "" -...I concern is the customer that is looking to turn in to the property and is traveling along U.S. Highway I at standard speeds wilT be slowing down to almost zero for a 90-degree turn. Ms. Snay stated the property directly North of this property is the Jiffy Lube does not have a deceleration lane either. Mr. Grande stated he has a tough time with the explanations of "the other people did it that way". Chairman Matthes explained that when dealing with multi lane facilities the FDOT will review the amount of traffic volume that is generated by the facility. Then they will put that information in different categories. For a major highway, the outside traffic lane is generally used for right turns. Only large volume generated establishments are mandated to put in a right turn lane. Mr. Grande stated he is fairly familiar with this area and if he remembers correctly not far down the road is where the traffic from Port St. Lucie Boulevard will be making a right turn on to U.S. Highway No.1. He stated there would be a significant amount of traffic and an ever-increasing amount of traffic making that right turn and then hitting the accelerator. In front of that car will be this company's customer who will need to slow down in that lane. He asked if it was a lot to ask for a deceleration lane for entry in to the property. He realizes it is not mandated. Mr. Hays replied that the request of a deceleration lane is a fair amount to ask. There are a lot of conditions that have to be considered, including the retention system along the side of the roadway. They feel this is the best solution after considering all the conditions. Mr, McCurdy stated he would like the landscape buffer between the facility and U.S. Highway No.1 detailed for him. He asked if dirt would be mound up and plants installed so that there will not be a direct view of the facility. Mr. Hays replied in the affirmative. He stated there would be a couple of different buffers. The first one will be a mounded landscape buffer that will come up approximately 2 feet above what is out there now, further an architectural fence would be installed along a portion of the property boundary. Mr. McCurdy asked if the front of the buildings facing U.S. Highway No. I would have a brick façade. Mr, Hays stated it would be a brick or block façade with a parapet on top plus a couple of different level changes. Mr. McCurdy stated this would not just be a chain-length fence with a metal building. Mr. Hays stated that fence would be a steel fence, which is kind of vertical. Chairman Matthes asked what would be the buffer at the rear of the property. Mr. Hays stated there would be a IO-foot landscape buffer on the backside, that has an I '-' '-' (Institutional) zoning. The current owner is Bellsouth. They plan on the standard 8-foot fence on the property in the back. Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing. There being no one the Public Hearing was closed. Ms. Snay stated that staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the conditions found on page 7 of the packets, with the addition of the following condition: "the applicant shall connect to central water service and water service upon the installation of these lines along the East side of U.S. Highway No, 1 adjacent to the applicant's property. The use of these private well and septic systems shall be discontinued except for inigation use until such time that an alternate water resource for inigation is available." Mr. Grande stated that he is not making a motion but he is saying that he clearly thinks this property is great for development and this is an excellent business for this location. He will not be able to vote in favor of this because he thinks that it is a risk to traffic for poor designing on the entrance. Mr. McCurdy stated after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, he hereby moves that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that that St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of MAG11nternational Development Company, for a conditional use permit to allow the operation of a 110,450 square foot mini-warehouse and self-storage facility in the CG (commercial, general) zoning district, because it is really good use of the site and falls in to the type of development that is needed for that part of the County. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously with a 6-1 vote with Mr. Grande voting against the motion. '. '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY '-0111 CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners, The Applicant Proposes the Following Conditional Use: To allow the consfruction of a 110,450 square foot Self-Storage facility to be known as Guardian Self Storage for 5.54 acres of land West side of U.S. Highway No.1, approximately 400 feet south of the intersection of U.S. Highway No.1 and Port St. Lucie Blvd. CG (Commercial General) Regarding f'roperty Located At: Currently Zoned: Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development Pianning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue, FI. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: December 4, 2000 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ,x I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): L £W /5 ;;: /J1/kE/< (J6r oFR{r- 80)( f?38/ pt1l?r S'7ï Ll/C IE' FLtJÆ'/t?/9' 6'1-9 ~5 I' Address: Date: 1~~/cV Signed: ;?-4~~"E Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. /IV ß1X O{J//V¡0/l.(. /T /5 !?ltJ/CV¿O 1/5 "/7? 8v/¿,C) .VVME.1IO<'5F5 ON U/l¿&I7¿5'¿E V. S. /!/6#¡"'-/1¡r I Fl?o"-'7/9GL.-;:?r TIIC 8//S/E5r- Comments: /~SFq-/t?/t/ /11/ ~fI//Vr- ii/Cre- {'&u/Vì"V, ItLL TllfS-Irv/L<...- 017 IS jJEI/j)¿v¿;- -¡-/IF ,Ç""l/RRoVN,þ/¡v6'- ~Rl?¡)£¡f--.T/E~·t-Sf'Ec/,¿J~ f/v/lF/V G¡:;n¡:-F//7 {'ov¿¡;? 8p /1M ò¡VG-O/tVb-- j?Roi!?é RJ7 vp..v /f ß/VONT1: I/V¡:J¿L- - 7.IØ~ /5 ¡PUl'1//VE?:} Ovr If L-C>/l/J- íl!Ç/¡/6I/....4 ~ (FilE NUMBER CU-00-009, MAGf INTERNATION DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) 7'1/1.5 rtfJO¡?(Ç..(J7 . 5'~c.7Í/l--cJ BE t./SF¿/ A<., i/\/I/Ar- LO/)? /}Jo^" :)E/1/Sr [J / C/7-};r¿c=5 /l s-,.¿.'oP,p/-v?- ('E..vTG?" / '-' 'wi Section 3,01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations S. CG COMMERCiAl. GENERAL 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for a wide variety of commercial uses intended to serve a population over a large market area. which do not impose undesirable noise, vibration, odor, dust, or offensive effects on the surrounding area, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with general commercial surroundings. The number in "()" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3,01,02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00,00 of this code. 2, Permitted Uses a. Adjustment/collection & credit reporting services (732) b. Advertising (731) c, Amphitheaters (999) d, Amusements & recreation services - except stadiums, arenas, race tracks, amusement parks and bingo parlors (79) e. Apparel & accessory stores (56) f. Automobile dealers (5S) g. Automotive rental, repairs & serv, (except body repairs) (151.753.754) h. Beauty and barber services (723172') i. Building materials, hardware and garden supply (52) j. Cleaning services 7349) k. Commercial printing (999) I. Communications - except towers ('.) m. Computer programming, data processing & other computer servo (737) n. Contract construction servo (office & interior storage only) (15/16/17) 0, Cultural activities and nature exhibitions (999) p. Duplicating, mailing, commercial art/photo. & stenog. servo (733) q. Eating places (581) r, Educational services - except public schools (52) s. Engineering, accounting, research, management & related services (.7) t. Equipment rental and leasing services (735) u. Executive, legislative, and jUdicial functions (91/92J93194/95/96/97) V. Farm labor and management services (07.) w, Financial, insurance, and real estate (6OI61Æ2163f54165167) x. Food stores (54) y, Funeral and crematory services (726) z. Gasoline service stations (S541) aa. General merchandise stores (53) bb. Health services (80) cc. Home furniture and fumishings (57) dd. Landscape & horticultural services (07.) ee. Laundry, cleaning and garment services (721) ff. Membership organizations - except for religious organizations as provided in Section 8.02,01 (H) of this code (56) gg. Miscellaneous retail (see SIC Code Major Group 59): (1 ) Drug stores (591) Adopted August 1, 1990 "8 Revised Through 08101100 hh. ii, jj, kk, II. mm, nn. 00. pp, qq. rr. ss. It. uu, w. ww. XX, ..... ....,¡ Section 3.01,03 Zoning District Use Regulations l (2) Used merchandise stores (593) (3) Sporting goods (5941' (4) Book & stationary (5942/5943, (5) Jewelry (5944, (6) Hobby. toy and games ,5945] (7) Camera & photographic supplies '5946' (8) Gifts, novelty and souvenir (5947) (9) Luggage & leather goods (5948) (10) Fabric and mill products (5"9) (11) Catalog, mail order and direct selling (596115963' (12) Liquified petroleum gas (propane) (59"1 (13) - Florists (5992) (14 ) Tobacco (5993' (15) News dealers/newsstands (5994) (16) Optical goods (S995) (17) Misc. retail (See SIC Code for specific uses) (5999) Miscellaneous personal services (see SIC Code Major Group 72): (1) Tax return services (7291) (2) Misc. retail (See SIC Code for specific uses) (7299) Miscellaneous business services (see SIC Code Major Group 73): (1) Detective, guard and armored car services (7381) (2) Security syslem services (7382) (3) News syndicate (7383) (4) Photofinishing laboratories (7384) (5) Business services - misc. (7389) Mobile home dealers (527) Mobile food vendors (eating places, fruits & vegetables-retail) (999) Motion pictures (78) Motor vehicle parking - commercial parking & vehicle storage, (752) Museums, galleries and gardens (M) Personnel supply services (738) Photo finishing services (7384) Photographic services (722) Postal services (<3) Recrealion facilities (999) Repair services (76) Retail trade-indoor display and sales only, except as provided in Section 7.00.00, (999) Social services: (1) Individual & family social services (1!32I6391 (2) Child care services (035) (3) Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (833) Travel agencies (472'1 Veterinary services (074) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7,04.00. Adopted August 1. 1 990 119 ( c Revised Through 08101/00 '-' ...,,¡ Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7,04.00. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7,06.00, 6, Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7, Conditional Uses a. Adult establishments subject to requirements of Sec, 7,10,10. (999) b, Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) - free-standing, (sa,,) c. Disinfecting & pest control services. (7342 d. Amusement parks, (7996) e. Go-cart tracks, (7999) f, Hotels & motels, (70') g. Household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehouses (999) h. Marina - recreational boats only. (4493) i. Motor vehicle repair services - body repair. (753) j. Sporting and recreational camps. (7032) k. Retail trade: (1 ) Liquor stores. (592) k. Stadiums, arenas, and race tracks. (794) I. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) 8, Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include Ihe following: a. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and/or civic, social, and fraternal organizations), b. One single-family dwelling unit contained within the commercial building, or a detached single-family dwelling or mobile home, (for on-site security purposes), c. Retail trade: (1) Undistilled alcoholic beverages (accessory to retail sale of food). Adopted August 1. 1990 120 Revised Through 08101/00 -- z · ~ E ~ 0 " 0 . · 0 E ~ · 0."' oi ° " · . .. ° · I ~."" > - ~ . ~ ° \\)If.~ " . . E ~. z " =~ · ¡ " " · I .- · , E 0 ~ " e:ë · ° 0. ~ : u · · · ~ ° · " ......., -' >. C -Cd Cd 0... ðE :.=;0 CdU C "- +-' O)C +-'0) cE (90... «0 ¿~ 0) o co o o I o o ~ :::::J U c o \ C , ~ i Œ ~ . I ~ -"O¥øtr1tll1(-,;;¡'1t~r I w ~ ~ Œ ç Z CJYOIIN!"SI:3OWII :J 0 U a..-o~_s " a:: . "'0'" W > ¡: ! ~ ä: .' ~ QI~W)Q w I . · G ". ~ r · · !iI~OU O:J1N$ Œ Z «: ~,' """ 0 ~ , ~"""" " """"- QVmI)Nl :r.IIÒ'îi"' '~ 1---a~J~'-~, "- .'" ", , "''''',,-, íZ-J l't'NYJ ~ ~f ( ,// ~ftF / /' ~'.,p.f;'-'iJ-" /' ",,/' ~ ~ ! Œ /\ // \ // í /( S .í 1 '5 !it 1 S ,[ 1 '\ >¡. Al.NnO~ 3380H~33)O w ~ ~ Œ ç Z :J o U w z ;::: a:: :¡; II! Œ w ~ ~ or A Petition of MAGllnterna~al Development Company for ~onditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan to allow the construction of a 110,450 square foot Self-Storage facility to be known as Guardian Self Storage for 5.54 acres of land located on the west side of U.S. Highway #1, approximately 400 feet south of the intersection of U.S. Highway #1 and Port St. Lucie Boulevard. ,.' .' " . ...r "/5,: .': "/4" '. ~. ~ .. ~ ~ ' .. . ,-' " h .. h '"',, ',- " .' -, . ~ ~ ~ h u ,. . ",.. " ',.'" '" -0 o o '" n::: "..16.". - . ....... . .- '-.:"",," ',- .. . ". . . .- .- -. -, - ",- ." -.- -." -0 ~ o c c '" ~ .. .. .," ", -:-.."..' :." .. ' ,.' .' " ':~,.:.: :':.: :IB..: ::~.: ~ , " . . , .. , . ". -. . ,"' .- , .. "." ","- ", " '. .. '.. . ..... .- ,:f5.... ":: -:~~- :~~/ '", .......-...........\ , Port St Lucie Boulevard !"'. . .. .. h ,. h . ,"' ," ',.'" ! :¡,..... .... ........... ..........11.11 ......... ."....,,~ i. :.:.:- :.:.:. ;.:. >. ~. ", ~ .', '" ",- . . , ". ", '. '.- ".-. · -. .. .. .- -.- . .' '., -., . . . . ", - -. " " .. ' .- '. ".. " · .. . . . . . -:"':"':".)".:" . - . . " .. .. h .. · . . . - . .' . .' . : :::' T. : ~ .... .' . . . . . .:".:".:".:".:" . . - . . ".. "., "., '.- '. ".- . "., "" ",.. ". +. ". " .. .. .. '" '" ',. ',.' , ' , ' , ' , . . '.- ", ------- '. ........ " " -. " '. ' " , N N N N N ~::~~:-:=-~~::='7': :.i ":.:'.,.~:".' . .. · . .. ., .. '...,. ',. .. ' . . . . ':".:"-:".:" , , - .. " .. .. :".:".: ".:" ',' '.' . . . 2 .' .. .,' . 0',: ." ." ,-'.' 0:: .' . . . . . '.' ". '. '.:~' ~ . ....'t ." . ... . , . . ,,"ft'·.. ::.>'> ~ . .. .. .. " " ~ :'<:~ :'~,:: :';.:\;,:~ :';.: g :.~.;.:~'~.~::'~.:.:~.~.;_::'~.;: g :'~';: :':. ~: :'~';::':'~. :'~, ~. ...J '. -" -' . '.' '.- ,- ',- . " .. Issac --- . " ".;" ", -."-." ., '. , .. :-,¡ ", .:..,:"-: ::;J....::.::z.t::- .. . · '.' ~ .. .. ", _ -0 -~," . 0:" '> :~'" 0.··'-.··· . .:.:ct: ::'.. "':7::': .' " .. '. '. " '.' '. ··'u..·· . ,·:æ:·. .. .' .' "'.'.. , ' .. .' .'. ::ø.,.:, ':'u':- ""0 :. .:. '!.... " 0:"" :,;. : '., . ",' " ;3:> .. .. .. , . ,- . " . , .. .. :2'1:-. I ",'''.'' ': .:~: .:- '" ,.s1, . :.4!1:.. . ., '. '.' . ':'20" .,' " . .. . .. .. '. .' '.' .. .' .' ". '.:~'f:. './9 ." . '. -!'!.: ~ ' 2'~. .. . '.,.. '.',,-"., ". ", " " ---------- · '" .-........, ..;..:.~~~.;..:.~;.:.~~ . CU 00-008 V / / /~ This pattern indicates subject parcel I <:1 This pattern Community Development i Geographic Information Systems ~ Map prepared NOllember 2, 2000 j N ThIo...",t>u_oomplOdfor--'plrnngord<eleferat_...... _-V_nubeen"...,.lOpItMdo......-aøanlord...,.",.... Wom>aJIonpoWblo...I'U"'tencIedIOr......IoQait,'~docufnanI ""' '-' MAGI International Development Company CU 00-008- Community Development t Geographic Information Systems Map prepared November 2. 2000 l1'IiI"""'__<>enØedb_"~oM""""""~rrif N _.._lOIIoftllMbeen_Ðl"C\ÒClltIe...............r<:I.,.,..1II --.¡>oed>Ioo.lit'""~Io<_...ioo;IaIIYlWdng~ """ 'WI MAGI International Development Company Zoning " " - .' . \. \ Boulevard r"" .. Por t s t Lucie " " " . . . '., '.' ',. '.- - ,- -. .. - :,,(1:" . ,- c.. 'JI 'k. / J)-5 7:- ~ .. .- -.' -' - '% '.. " "J' '"01(. ," .- " '-',' ,-' . - '"J9. ;" ;". «J;'" Issac '"þ- . :._~:. '( . .. :.?J::"-:Ö-':' : .-,¡- .- ',- '·;u."·· .: -g .:... ~,,'..' ·".'v:·· 0 .'.: OC. ';':r';'; '" , .. :-:22:- .. :-:6:-: ·Z(:.. . ;$,. 'D : ~ 0;'" . " " -~~- :: ¿4::· . - :: '~J:;' ,-2& .- - . .' 20,':' '-'.zo;:,' I: ..·~:u.. -:'5:" .. ~i' '.8." . - :-:25' .. . " .,~ " CU 00-008 V / / /~ This pattern indicates subject parcel [ . . -I This pattern . . . -',' ..... . ,~u -, -, , ' ·t' .- . . · '15.: -.. " ". .. . . . . . . ." " . '. .. " -. .. '6 ",.I!>:'", o 0::: " ",', '. , '. u .. .. .' - .' - .' . .' . . . . . . ';""/6,".. '," -,' '. .. . . . 1:) ~ o c ~ ':~:.: :~: ./8' ':~.: 20 ..J -';>08 '.. .. " .. - '. " . - . '," ," '-.- -. " ". . , .. .. - - - ',_." . ..~h, ,(4. '.Ii. .:¡Zoo . " '" ",- ,.,' -,' -.- ",' ..' '. '. . i...... .u....... .... "......... .."... ................"'! ;,. -,' -,' -. -.'. . - . . ".. -.- "" .. .. h .. .. .. -,' ',- '-' ',- -.' · .. .. .. .. ' , , . - , . " , - -- . . '. . . · .. -' . .- . .' . .- .. .. .. -.-' . -. -, '. - .. .. .. '-" ',- '." -,- " .. .. '" . -:.:.:::-:.:-,.::.:.- -" '.' ',- '," " '" . '., .' .' '., .' -. -. " · " . .' ,....... .. .. . '-" '., -. -, - -, ., .. .. '.- ',-' . ' , . . . . . .' '-' '., ------------ ~;-:-~-;':~~;~~;::-:.~ .. - - .. ". '.' '.- '.- '." ",- · .. .. .. .. . . '., .' .? . ' , .. ..CG" '.- -. - "' - ," , " .. .. ., . . . ' ".." . '." ,'.' g ~.:.~..~.:.:.~ .:.~ '.:-.':.:,:'. "., '-' ......- '. -. -. -. . '!þ ú' , : :' ~:: :' ~:- :' ~ :!:';.:: : : - --- g :"";:::";'; :-": :'~'; .,~.:: ~ ~:;'~_:~:;';:~'~'~:~'~'~::":';: ., . , " -. -, - . .. .. . '., .-":"-: .' '." .... .. .. . .' - . .' . . -, -, '. . - . "'.-'.- "'. - " ..... . " . - .. ':·_::9.::' . ,- ',-' . ' . .....-..... .. '. . . -.- . .. -' .- ..;.:.-;..;.:.-;..;.:.-;.;.;.~~ Comrnunity Development Geographic Information Systerns Map prepared November 2, 2000 l 1 ~ ltQ....t>u_~Ior~p¡.mir1g__PLfPOHIrñ( _"*'I_,...__lI>pr_tt."""'c:urnonI_~ ~pooooIbIo,.ionol~b"_U.~t>RIing_ N '-' '-' MAGI International Development Company Land Use " ...J ·Ù.: " -- ", '." .. .~: -. -. - ". -g ··..16.· o a: R .. .. . . . ,'-.' -.- -.- M "·;':"';':"·;'''C·;·G:--···;'·· :.:.:.:.:.:.".- .-:- .. -. .' .. .. . 0' ',' -,_. . -- .. .. ". ". D .. ~ o c c . " .- () ...J ". .. ." .. . -."' . ".-", - . .. .. , , :16",'" :18: "19.: 20 .". ". .. -. -, -,' - ',...- .. .. ., . " . .' . .' " " . !S'-, . (f. .r.i· .:æ, -. " .'.-' .-.:- -. -. -. . 1...................."..............It ....." IOU. II."."~ .. .' ' .- .- .- " -- . -. -. -. -,' .- -- .. -- .. . ". ',- ".- ',- .... "'.IQ:' , ',_." -..', .. .. . '.' " '." ". ":".,.-.; · , . .. .. ., .. · .' . .- . .- . .- · . . . . . . -. -. .. ., · . . · -- ,. .. , . , " " .. " . . · '., '., '" . -. ". ".i ." ·....2···. ---------- . -' . -' . .' . .- . .' ~-~------ . . . . . . '. ,- ",- . . '.. ," ",- .. ... ,. ". . "" " " 2 g:(3$:- - . . . -'J'" ,:'" ,.:" ;,:.... ',,::' .~--~:<"~' ¿",; >~/ Issoc ...... ......" g >=.:> -. c·.... . QJ", . --1 :.:'- ,_ .. .. 14-' ,'25," "" . .. ',- . " . ...- . _:¿J:;:":~':' . ,"' " . .. '-'-,'ft': -' ,- '. -. " 'tZ , " :: .::: -g u',:',~.: ":~:" O,~",'" '.: a: ::.,,: .. " '7.' '" " -- '.- ',-' .. .- - ,- ~ ':22: " .. . <21 -""" :- :6' · . " . '.. '" . '. -, . " ,"2J .- '0 : . ~ 0: '·Ú::: .- '. ',9.:" . .. , -.' :'20':' .. . -'..29:-: I ,. '4 '.oj.' .. "$~ - : ¿4~ :' " '.- - ." ". , -,- RU -¡ ,- :'~? '.8,'" <:'~:'< .... :':25:" " ". . " . . ' " . - -' ". . u ---------- ,.;...:.~.,....:.~~~.:..::.....¿~ CU 00-008 V / / /~ This pattern indicates subject parcel I' ,I This pattern indicates i. Community Development r Geographic Inlormation Systems' Map prepared November 2, 2000 ThIomap,...r-.~for_..~_-......IUP<*II,""" N', _-relloo1t>aobeen_laPfO'\ÖIi'Iot..............._.......... ............1on~..iol"OJtinl«lded""_u.-.gotybir"dng~ '-' -...I MAGI International Development Company :".. T ."."."."." \ '. 1 .(, \ ': \ :.,..," iÌ ,.\'.. >.1 ,. Ii . :\' n ~ r r u 0 . \ .. _, c . y_ ,,-- -- c 0.1)2' ~ ,'(J.04 : . : , : . :'.j: ::.: '" 07 ac , ,. ".:.:. :'..: : 'j: '''.. .5 _ \:. ,- ",'tr. ." ..... O,31·ac··;':,;:¡;" ." ' .. '0': 0 ,'.;: "7,,%)". ." ,/; lA, j .. ~ ·r.. i·: ::,\' \''' ... 'I '. ':,~~ . :'; :-, l' i , :'·z. I.' :';' J'. ' , " ,I' ~\ ;~':/> ,,' ... ; ,f; iW~~\. ~'/(I \~:Þ \J:\'~.""""'" I '" ¡h ,\: i-"'.::_ ; <,>,' O..u¡ ac Xi ' '; , ,'\ K.~0~~\::,:.:>::'(?~~ / 1 ' '" ," ;.'" ..'19 ~O¡\;i~~~;~) /:_.... '/ / ' : .~ \.Ä:1 ~~ \, ;:: '/) ,>1 Bolton Ave -:: "",: "\:.' // " ~\" :·i:' i'. W j)5 ac~ ¿; ,- : ~ .... "",:' ·"k':¡ :¿ ~ :: :" ~ ~:~:~ ~ ; Issac F .. :'~ :": 1::'J::~~.t~' '-\ "J;~~!'ç\:: I..,'. ~-\\¿. .._.: :\ ~:6 .; "!'- '; .'~ " . ,>' ß;~¿": 11; " " -, - '," , '¡:: ~Q,2~,~~ ,,0,20, _å, ::: -:¡: 'zr.u ":27:: g~;t~;r~ .~~~~¿- '.. ¢'~¡..~__ : '.:(};:;" ' B· \\V .' .. . . . . . ". -.-. ";" ..,'~.:> . ~r¡~¡~ ~~)~~ :\ . :'~.: .;" " 4·" '\~ Ä% , '.;" ~ Port r.,: L "\ u,S- , : .. ,,: , ,. . ,ii' i' -¡::¡;- ., ''': .14- ..: _~: " .. ::4,: ':2& : .. " " , 6 " , '2J, 1 , I .. .n ; ~4~ ; I : I .. .. 1 : ; :~; : 1 1 " 1 I " .:21.: 'D L 0: " . , .. ., - " - - -4.. - "5"" ." : I: " :29. .)if:~. " '.8;" j,' JI' u .Jz..: " cu 00-008 ............. 500' boundary r·· .. . . . .- ," . -- ., n .. " .. "-~c-:b~ ¿h' TI o o 0:: h .. .m. n " ., n " n :'i~: )~'~ ;'~~ : 20"; :: .. ., .. .. .. u " m ~: . ":8" Zo U' . .. !~". ~. ,c' .-.í~ .. .. -- .. .. .. .. .. .. : .. .. h N ;:..;: )': ;: .. .. n .. .. .. , , , ::':yJLÆ\.!'1 " to. 1jmJfFrf:9i~~ - - ----- _ ac':' , "XO.04 ac -'0.6 ... .. .. " " · . . . · . . . :::",--:::,,~:-,::C:-'::C:_ -, . -,.. "., ..". .- · -." .-' .' . .. .. .. .. , ' . . , , 0" "' .. .. .. 0: . :.. ,": ; --:. ;":: ; ~ ;' ~ ~':: ;";: " ~ ..... ....- ;,::)'< ~ ;"': ;" . >,~ ;" . ;" . '\ --1;"'---:- .... ...J .> :- ,> ,> ,;' ,- '::.".,. .:~~ ... . .. - . . . . . . . . '. . - '. '- ", ,: .: .: .: .: '\' ,,~ i\ :,"::. : :: : '\ -u':'''~.'' OJ)8ac, . u."" '" W·' . ' '.-, ~..-.. .......... ..1 ~... ,. . . .. ".". .. . : 9. : , ' , ' , . i , 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I r----------- .. : : .. .. .. .. -:-~-:-~-~-:-~- Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map prepared November 2, 2000 l .. 1: r N Thiomap.....~ccmpí-.dIŒ_..~ond_~"""'. wtoio ..wy~t>eI_..-1O proyido'" _.,.."..,....-.1..,..... ôormo!lo<1pout>1o.~.not~ro._u.IoogoIIIotÞi"1l3inØ~ ~ ; Q. § u Ë :: ~ Ë . Q. £0 0: = > .ß ~ .~ n ~:.§ .s . u = :E t ¡',Š -- 1,'" ~ < ~::E ~ - t.£ 5.~ 09 ~æ ~;j ~U ,:;- "= ~ o . ~ ~ o ~ U u 'ë< =~ ¡;,,::3 = OJ] f = == ~'= ~::E ~ ~ - - ... o '<> ":' N Q.~ .. ... NM '-' ~gg~:;~~'¢"~~ .......oo.........t--.....................,. ~~5:;:;~:z~~~~ ~O;:~~~~~b::O;:O;: ..,...,.~..,...,.'<t..,.'<t"<t..,. M("")M("")("")MMMMM 1< ~~~......J......J"';¡......J......J......J......J......J......J ';'¿ /..!..,.............. /..!.., /..!.., I-Lo /..!.., /..!..,..... /..!.., 1.> 1.1 "-' ·ü ·ü "g .3j~ ~ U 0000 ã ã 0.0. g N o 1;5 ~ " 0:",,'" - '" ° b u ã ~~õ ~~O :!t.f.)WLõJ toOOtn """ M "0 V'I 0 M <:::;;;; on ~ e · :z: .,. ~ :z: .,. ~ e · :z: ... ~ :z: '" ë · :z: ..s o ~ o ð'i . " '" - ¡¡:j ~ c Ë .g .2 :a = Ë ~ ã z ~ ~ ã5 g f2 ~ \() r.- '-0 '<t" =â~g ;§ ~ ó ~ 1;5~ 8- o.:::¡ " " 'ü 'ü .33 '" '" ã Š 0.0. 1) o:J U <U "g ,J ,3 Õ ~.3.3.3 ~1;5 a 8 000. 000000 888 0.0.0. o ~ ~"'O"O~"O"'O-o~ <u~~ë~~';~ -":]]Æ...æ ]öõ:;æð~;:g .~ ¡;,¡.¡ w ~ w ¡.¡.¡ t:.1 00 ¡:r¡OO 000000 0000 0 f2~OOÑ~~~ O'¢"o::t"""",¢"MO OONNMNNN- . o .~ ;> '" ::¡ ~ ê ~ 0.. 5 :8~~i~"5 Æ::¡::¡~.s::¡ ~ .§ .. -": !.§ i i ~ ~o ;:I..,..c.d_ ¡:r¡UC,;lUC)U ü '" ] '" "'3 ~ ;> ~.ã]aoo~ <w~<è~:r:Q ;,¡'" e ~ ~~ o .5 Ó ~ Æ ~ ggf~Ë]=~ã ~ 2 g"c;¡..c 1! lš-š ¡:QIJ:III1UUUUU M NO 00 N ... "'NM OON ~óc:i o ... "'NN 0" 0 ~óo o ~~~~~~~~O\..,.~~ uM\O'<t"'<t '<tNOO'<:t....N <6~~~::;:;~~~~~g =06;;~66d66~ci Õ ¡... g~~8~S8oõ8g; 0000000000'0 ;::::~~~~g~g~~;;::: _"o~~~Ng~t'-~g:O _'1" 00000000"" 8 o;;;;;;;;;:;:::;::gg g;;:: ° ..,..,..,............,....,..................... M..,.~~~~~~~~~;:!; ~;;~;!,;;;:J;;];;;;;;;;;;;]; gog 080 'i''i''i' '<>'<>'" g;~~ .......,. M ~ M lititi ~p oo",t! ,;:,;:,;: 1j~ "''''''' lH :3:3:3 "''''''' . . . :ä;¡¡:ä . ~ Ii ::¡::¡::;¡ üüü " g 0 .5._ "5 .." " :2]] üüü 111 :~:~:~ ~~~ «'" iii ::¡::¡::¡ ~H ::;¡::;¡::;¡ ~H H~ &:~~IO") 0\('>11\00 0000\t=: ~..,.~..... OO~".¡ M ~ <>- ~ ~ -" o oo~..... ~\oo ~~t=: o:~ 888 \O!::~ ;..,...,. 000 000 ~ ~ ~ õõo ~ ~ ~ "":!;"":I :;..,...,.0 MM(""\E- ......, :g~~~~~~š~~~~~~~.~~~~g~g§ ~6~6~~~~~~~~~~~~~~¿~~~~~ .....~V)ooV)lO")oo....,~..............,~~V)ooo.....O\~O\~~c ~(""\~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8 MMMMMMMO_MMMMMMM(""\MMMM M~ ""':¡.....J""':¡""':¡>- I-L."'-'........zG::..... " .¡¡ .3 f oo"j:¡ r;; ~ t:: ;¡¡ 1:: 111 æ~æ~ ,....:¡,....:¡,....:¡,....:¡,....:¡,....:¡,....:¡E-~,....:¡,....:¡,....:¡,....:¡.....J.....J.....J,....:¡ I-L.~~~~I-L.~uZ~~~............~ -" ~ "n "n"11 ~ u.3.3.3~ ~ _.. _ E OOtl.lP-ocnOOtl.l"@ ÆHHÆ; " " 'õ 'õ jj o ~ .~ = '-' >.3 " .¡¡ j '" .3 "0 -": i~ .~ 1;5 ~~ "'~ g", "'0 M ~ '" if ..s ~ 0- § 0: ~ 00 :g š ::¡ 0. ::¡ . B '" ~.~ "~] QQQ¡.¡. ~ M <>- ON o " 0 "5'õ ~ .a -g j.3 - -....1 oooo~1~oo 888 Zo g 8 p..,P-oL1. ooø.. ... o " "~,, ""j ~.....~~ou o 00 0 0 g .~_Uþ ðg:~ö:s W~W;W~ ooZOOtl.lO ~ ..... ~ 00 _o~\O~ ..,.oo",,"""M ('>IIMNN",," '" ã " '" !! ~ d ,::"" " " 'g þ ~ ,....:¡ "- ,....:¡ tI.Iu¿r.¡t:~V5 t: 8 t: 0:: "': t: æ~Æ~~~:::: -. " "'~ ¡¡ " ~S :::í2 " ""O'I1i~ ",-,,:].:; ] ~ E ~ ~S:J> ~ w ~ 0 0000 Q2 ~~g:!; ;;~::!:: N M 0 .!:I ~ 0 Uti) ..". ~~~"O~~ § ;j ª ~oo ä ~~~,.~g-¡¡".:; M 0000 tJ ~ M U V) ~ oow;.t~w;.tp.¡O\~ ~{lJtIJ tlJcnoo~ 00000000 ON..". 00 o&::~:;!::~o~ ø..___N_Np..,OO ~ ~ ~, . . ~ is = ~ ª'. <So: - - " z .t:r. 0:: -.. C 0 e % ã"""g u :,J z;:; ~ ~. o = ~ ~ "' j '" I '" - o '" .5 . ~ "ª ::¡o. ::1 " ." j " .s ~ '" ¡¡.ì! ~ !i ~ ü ~ ~ ~ iL~ g o:t::~~~ ü ~ ~ '" '" :t ~ 6 ~ð " '" .. Q. ... "'M g""! .,. o ~~ ~N ~O o <>-...'" ó:;: ¡f ¡¡ j 1 z ~ ' :~~ o 0 "''' -'" .g .. 0. ~ ~ d ~ 0.0. a::;....E- quH :11"'.....,"'_ 0:0: ii ¡¡ OJ:;: ::¡ e .;: ¡;¡ :~ .. ;> ü~ h o .s , ,§ ]111 ~ ...: ~ .~ ~ '"' g .8 j;j'-" :; j:~u!~~~ . ~~l u "- "'''' ~ E ~ - ;:!: "õò ~~ "013.2 ~ 0000:1: -'" ~ g " 0 :g ~ Š 0.0.0. o \00\001- ~oooo 00000 o '" '" o ~ 0<>-00 MMN ~ó~ o 0 :!;d~ cicici ~ 00 0"'''' V)~~ ~ å \00' o '" ~ ~ '" OM '" t-M V)M'O:t ~N~~~&:~$~~~\O ~:;tO~~~~:2~""':;::~ OOM~~W')""\D\Doooo",," o'~O ÒÓOONOÒ "'<>- ('<)'0 _0 ~ M 00 00 qr--; _ 0 oo~~O\~~~OO~", OOOMO'\NOt-"""O\...., ooN~t-~""'oo\D'<t \O~r:~~:ri~?2~N ciociciòó °N...o o::r~""O\"'O\OooMooOW')O~..,.t-NOO~'<tV)t-O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCCoo~ 8gg~8g8°""'8ggõgg;g8gg §~5 :!;~bo~~W')~S~~gS8~00~N~O 00 ~ONONÕOOONÕNOO 008t- ON CO ..,...,gV)go.....V)8go~....,8gV)°o:!;g....,gV)£ ~~~~~~~~V)~:ri~~V)~~~:ri~~~~~~ ......_....._~..,.~~:!;~=~~..,...._.,...._'<t~:!;~~:!;~'<t~'<t~ ..,...,..."...,...,.~~..,...". ..,...,...,..."..."...,.o::r..,..."..."...,. MMM~MMMMMM~MM(""\MM""'MM(,,,,\MMM~ '-' -...I '" M ~ N " " '" ::: t- !;;> 00 M '" '" M N 0 00 ~ ~ ~ 00 00 ~ ,- '" 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "1 - M N N N + N N N N - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.. 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" Ñ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. M M M M M M M M M ~ œ ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J .¡; "' "' "' ¡;; "' "' "' ¡;; "' " "g ., " " ~ ~ "2 ~ G ":] 'õ 'õ .:1 .:1 .:1 .3 0 j .3 ~ ..J -;;;0) >5 ¿;; " 00 00 1;0 1;0 ~ e? " " " . " " 6 " Û . 0 0 0 .3 0 0 0 ;;; ~ ~ '- '" '- '- '- ~ ;.. = œ 0.. e e U Ê '5 ~ e . 0.. £e -¡¡ = > ..g ~ œQ n ..: .2 .,5; .~ E -=~ 0..= ~- ~t; . ...: ~~ ~<oS e'" 0..= e '" ;:g ~6 QU .f' ~ =,£ ê ~ Ë if o . U ü 'õ~ " . ~:::3 g ¡f æ:'= B- ';j Q:; c~~~~~! ~ ~ .g .§ fj ; ~ '9 ~ ;¡¡ 'U ~ -¡j._ rlJMu:r:aõòaæ ftJO\¡,.,,¡wwiüww f:: ~ 00 00 00 ;>0 tI'J 00 "0 ro N W r- "Oo~g~~'{¡~ <c.. NNNNN '" ~ œ Z 'E . ~ o "' ... ~ Z ~ ... . e œ Z ~ ~ '¡j OJ .g " '- M ~ Z ~ " > .., 00 " o t: o ;- .... . e œ Z o w ::E 'f~ ~~] o ~ E " ~ ~ oS '" ;:¡ o U U '" - <U 5 ~ <» 'û ~ ~ ø. - i.3~at~ Z Vi 00 ~ ~ ¡:: v, . c U g .... -.r '<") N =â"'=~ ;9 ~ M\DV M '" 00""<"'10 oot-t-\O ~~~ci 6"';0 t~~ ~~:b0\ e,,¡O.....NOO":tMOO <~~~~~~~ =r-:~"":6~66 Õ ¡... N '" '" '" t- o 'It !;¡ 8 ~ ~ ~ œ ~ ¡... M ....O\O~N.,. 000000 ""00000 ONO......OO N.....VNt'- 0000 r- ~;;£~8o o c '" ~$;:;:;$;:;;~ -T'<tN-TNN "T'¢f:i;;'!;iç: M...... M..........!"'1 " > ...:'" 'Š ~ .- ~ E- 8.:! "'''' "'''' N .... "'00 t-oo _ N '.J f ~ g -¡¡; ~ !§ W..J N 'õ N œ '" œ 0.. ...:...: .~ j j~ '" ~ .-1! 'Ë ¡¡ :0> t .Ii .iLE NN <: ~ .B ¡;'-'i . 0 :n, 0<: i æ ...... '" " E~ <;¡ Q - . :0> H NN M", ~.. ~:2 ci.... M",'" ~'<f"gg ~~~ ~ ~ ó ....'" g~ ~~ 00 00 :::~ 00 ~ ~ .,...,.;;; .,..,.Õ MM;- '-' -- 51.lUOtCOlJNT'f - ~t...NNJNG......m ZONING C~SQt.l 'UMIC HfAIING AGfNO" No.-t... 16. 2000 10 WI-IOM IT IM'f CONCflN: , NQflCf to ""'''' ..- _ oc.aor.\ doftc~ ..... s...... I1.OQ.ðJ "" "'" 5'.l.......C--.. \0"<1 O~oeI· _,C~O'Id....p'..""lIooo. ~:i:!~~~~O;1 ~"""""""'_.~__5l· (..co. CouaIy 1I....,.;....,¡...... lo~- "'9 COOOOIIIko_........... ""'J o!lo_'~I~ !. ¡,¡;..".,lcI.. Ct""'~ QOI God. t"'Qdo<>agolll~"_1 .....llol¡:."wv;O!>Q!llJ"iftgl ~~~"IO"i~91 '...!d. No 3.c(1'_I41-OOO1.(11)01 1'" ,.", 1/2 "A....IaIo--. ~...lIMlwa:rt_ð/\OI 22t1.~h""""J"'" ~o;e....E....lrlOopo'-1o~ I'NEQrtl;...oIld':nt!<wh;(_.. 511611 Hatll<dJO;d'Ii;>I',S. £. <__;__.....~"'tM 5~~"'_oI..,.I\ot;IIIIo\C..... wllI....¡MSooooII.......1oOid1oo' no.klJ*oiI~1fSS"'" EQtII n ~Jør""" S- bcO"o....s..tð.;lioooolSediool '.'OWfIoSIIOpJ6s-Þ,~.O fOfl.0IId"'''''fhl",S1(2 01 .... S~ 1/_ Of .... HE 1/1, lfSS....,...:u'-clQ(-..I'1 _paR<. ,""'"' 9. t-"1' USOlolllo.......or.... ¡~StOSOI-dotA_ : 2.1/1MG1..............()ptIcrp.- _C~.foroCc>oodl- tóooogUw,.......sIro\clPs.. P\QfI ... ... .... -..ctlofl 01 tI 110.<11_..... '- w_ s.,.1IIØtf""..~1K o...6aR$tI~IatS.S4 O<nlol.....,Ioc-'...""'...... lio '"' U-1- "IÎf'I"'..... ... "!IØ'......,.<IIDO~"""'... ..~IIfU.s.~ 1111O'1111'a11S1.LaodIIouI.wwd I~ th...........9 "wiMd -- It-*"" w.. &ide .. u.5. HIghwayNo.I,~"""'" '90..............~ oIlJ.$.l4IghwerNø.'.....,.., ~~~ I 341<11.501-5QOI.16OO I 3-41<11-501.".110] , J.I.-~I.""!003 TtIorI,..n"'''''8I'Id<ll,'''''' W_..U.S.....,...,I.~ 12.'~:J1......... .OEII$I'.St.l.-~s..- ~___ÍII""""'I. reg. 36. ,..- I«wd&. St. ~c....,.,....,....oood c~.........."",,..... JU..S .... . ..-wd .. ........""'-*"'.......". ...,. .. u.s. I, ....... $.6' ~_Of__.... IIw ........'U6..........,. lDcDIÎOII:Wø""..U.s..... .....No.I.................. ""-"'at.............. U.s. HIPwor NoI. I .... ~ II. ....... f!JIU(: HtAtINGS .... .. "*' IIIC.........~.... ''''''.~tJOQv........ ""- f... ftIoft. 1100... ... ~16.1OOO,~ fII''OO'.M..QI<r._.....,¡· w__ ~AN'f1Os.c.o..2tUIO$. flðtldo s......... ."'....- dI(..lO........ ....t.d...... ......,·boon100MCr.Of ~""''*'fIK!..","," -'Wc~CIIO"""" .."-ÕIIQ.............-.t ."fM~l,....""'-,., ....""'..........-.....,.. _._o~..-..e4 '" ~....... it ...... wM;tI --.I~"'''"''-r~ ,,-,,-,_oMr,io_"'" It.toiMobMed. nANNIHÇ AM:IlONING -- - ST.lUOf CQUNT'f'. fl.QIIOI\ I'S/~~~ MUSK:~",2ODQ -..; \"ht:- ~eL0S , \ -LD -00 ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: '-' '\genda Request Item Number 5 c.... ...., Dale: January 9, 2001 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg, [ I ] [ ] [X] Quasi-JD [ X ] Presented By fÌ 0.. - 4.d1 ~ C munity Development Director Request to Define a Class "A" Mobile Home as a Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit for 29.99 acres of land located at 10280 Bluefield Road, on the east side of Bluefield Road, immediately adjacent to the terminus of Bluefield Road, in the AG-5 (Agricultural - 1 du/5 acres) Zoning District - Draft Resolution 01-001. Petition of Jeffrey and Tara Tobin to Define a Class "A" Mobile Home as a Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit in the AG-5 (Agricultural - 1 du/5 acres) Zoning District. (File No,: MH-00-002) Board of County Commissioners Community Development Director NIA None Approve Draft Resolution 01-001, to define a Class "A" Mobile Home as a Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit for 29.99 acres of land located at 10280 Bluefield Road, on the east side of Bluefield Road, immediately adjacent to the terminus of Bluefield Road, in the AG-5 (Agricultural - 1 du/5 acres) Zoning District. COMMISSION ACTION: [J[] APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER County Attorney Originating Dept.; Finance: ;;tv Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Purchasing: Other: (AGEND538a) """ ...., COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: 0[/09/01 File Number MH-OO-002 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Community Development Director DATE: January 2,2001 SURJECT: Petition of Jeffrey and Tara Tobin to Define a Class "A" Mobile Home as a Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit in the AG-5 (Agricultural - I du/5 acres) Zoning District. LOCATION: 10280 Bluefield Road, The east side of Bluefield Road immediately adjacent to the southern terminus of Bluefield Road ZONING DISTRICT: AG-5 (Agricultural - I du/5 acres) FUTURE LAND USE: AG-5 (Agricultural - 5) PARCEL SIZE: 29.99 acres SURROUNDING ZONING: The AG-5 (Agricultural - I du/5 acres) Zoning District is located to the north, south, east, and west. SURROUNDING LAND USES: F1REIEMS PROTECTION: The existing uses are residential, conservation and agricultural. Station HII (Shinn Road), is located approximately 23 miles to the east of the subject property. UTILITY SERVICE: Water and sewer service is provided by an on-site well and septic system. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS: RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: Bluefield Road is a county owned/maintained right-of-way 50 feet in width. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None at this time, '-' ...., January 2, 2001 Page 2 Petition: Tobin Class "A" Mobile Home File No.: MH-OO-OO2 TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity ********************************* COMMENTS The petitioners, Jeffrey and Tara Tobin, are requesting authorization to install a new 26.33-foot by 48-foot mobile home meeting the definition of a Class "A" Mobile Home as set forth in Section 2.00.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The applicant ordered the Mobile Home Unit directly from the factory. This unit was delivered to the proposed lot. The unit is already installed and has the appropriate tie-down straps to ensure hurricane compatibility. There is no electricity or water into the unit at this time. Upon receiving Class "A" Mobile Home site plan approval, the applicant will be required to submit an application for a building permit, and pay the applicable fees, in order to provide water and electricity to the unit. The proposed Class "A" Mobile Home is on a 29.99 acres of land located at 10280 Bluefield Road, on the east side of Bluefield Road, immediately adjacent to the southern terminus of BIuefield Road, in an area of some residential, agricultural and conservation uses. The County owns a major tract ofland that abuts the subject property (Blue field Ranch). County staff has reviewed the application and determined the proposed mobile home complies with the objective standards of review as forth in Section 11.05.02(D) of the County Land Development Code, which allows the county to define a Class "A" Mobile Home as a Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit. Section 11,05.02(D) stipulates that mobile homes proposed to be defined, as detached single-family dwelling units must be similar in texture, color, and appearance of single-family dwellings in the same zoning district in which it is to be located. Staff has reviewed the proposed mobile home and its specifications and has verified that these standards have been met. The attached plot plan and rendering provide the details of the proposed Class "A" Mobile Home. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 01-001. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: J}~:LL- c, ia Shewchuk, AICP mmunity Development Director cs cc: Jeffrey and Tara Tobin Vikki Aaron File '-' -..I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION 01-001 FILE NO.: MH·OO-002 A RESOLUTION DEFINING A CLASS "A" MOBILE HOME AS A DETACHED SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLING UNIT IN THE AG-5 (AGRICULTURAL - 1 DU/5 ACRES) ZONING DISTRICT IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Jeffrev and Tara Tobin presented a petition to Define a Class "A" Mobile Home as a Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit in the AG-5 (Agricultural- 1 du/5 acres) Zoning District for the property described below. 2. On January 9, 2001, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 3. The Class "A" Mobile Home determination is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the standards of review set forth in Section 11.05.02(0) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners has determined that the request of Jeffrey and Tara Tobin to Define a Class "A" Mobile Home as a Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit to be located on that property described as follows: A parcel of land beginning from the northwest corner of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 37 East, St. Lucie County, Florida run north 89°47'40" E along the section line for a distance of 3317.1 feet to the southwesterly line of Evans Properties, Inc., for the Point of Beginning, thence run south 30°44'17" east along Evans Properties, Inc., property line a distance of 511.6 feet; thence run south 59°Õ5'54" west a distance of 1436.53 feet to the east line of Bluefields Road; thence run north 35°36'50" west along Bluefields Road a distance of 890.62 feet; thence run north 59°05'54" east a distance of 1506.79 feet to the southwesterly line of Evans Properties, Inc. thence run south 30°44'17" east along the southwesterly line of Evans Properties, Inc.. a distance of 376.36 feet to the Point of Beginning lying In and comprising a part Resolution 01-001 Page 1 File No.: MH-00-002 January 2, 2001 '-' '-' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 of Sections 10 and 15, Township 37 South, Range 37 East in St. Lucie County Florida (29.99 AC) (TAX I.D. NO. 4110-433-0020-000/6). (Location: 10280 Bluefield Road, the east side of Bluefield Road, at the southern terminus of Bluefield Road) is consistent with the requirements of Section 11.05.02(D) of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is hereby approved. B. A copy of this resolution shall be placed on file with the SI. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX Vice-Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Cliff Barnes PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 9th Day of January 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney Deputy Clerk cs H\WPIMobile Home ProjectslTobinlResolution.doc Resolution 01-001 Page 2 File No.: MH-00-002 January 2, 2001 -.. ~ ~ OKEECHOBEE ~ COUNTY ...., , 35 S v/ " /ø~/ - (/~ ~ ri.0'¿ ~ A '-. '- -, ;:: :Þ ::IJ -< Z " ", r-o '- °3 r-- " ()~.--I ~~"œ- ''"' ~ () ,0 .-+ ~ " !U~-..l:!!I!.~,!'O-'D___~ ._~ S>fE£OR{~____i ---------1 ~ Œ~~~~~ ! ~ ¡ ~ 1£0000R CAHAljltOAO -c~~O~L (41\11. c·,.. ~, w œ ~ o o c ~ S_RO..ID BIIOCUIoITNROAO " ~ ~ ~ T 3-4 S ~ " ~ ~ " ~ ;, z 0 5> J z " ~ .. = Z ~ i '. ::IJ I <: ~ m ::IJ . 0 0 C z ::<! " ___~JP!L~Ø~D_~ ~ ~ _tIol£RSOli_ÞOI't>U..~ ~ ~ I . § " " " ¡ . ¡ . ~ c.... CD ....... , ....... ...... ~ CD ~ o ' , '< · ~ 0 ~ 0 P.J ~ " I : · n 0 :J . ~ 0 .. I "3 . 0. 0 ~. :3 ~ , _ c 0 \ ' , , o ~ 0 - õ !' " ~ I P.J . 3 " ~'"42'Q~ 0 ; ~ . .... 0 ...... I -. < P.J ~ o . 0 " , - 0 [\) ~ ~ ~3 - N · . g ~ , 0 0 · ~ 3 (J" · Z ------ :J '-" -' A petition of Jeffrey and Tara Tobin for a Class A Mobile Home to be permitted on 29.99 acres of land located in the AG-5 (Agricultural1dlJlS acres) Zoning District. MH 00-002 1 [ Community Development 1\ Geographic Information Systems '; Map prepared December 19. 2000 I ]'\ m.mAP__<>OI1"ØIWgrge<WII~....,.,¡,..g.-.:l~~MI)I· _~eIIor1__m8dolOprtMde"'"''''''''~W\d'''''''''' ir1Iormo:Iion pouit>Io.~iI I'OII<>Irœd 101........ '-odi brding docunIrt. V / / ~ This. pattern indicates subject parcel '-' .....I Zoning Jeffrey And Tara Tobin MH 00-002 1 (. Community Development i Geographic Informatiõn Systems y Map prepared December 19, 2000 ~ V / / ~ This. pattern indicates subject parcel T1'ÎI""f!t8I-.compiIe(IIorOW-WplBnnlngond..Ier8I'c;ø...,..,....Of'Jy NI _~lIIIoIIhIoIbMn~lCpnMdl1hornDII"..,....._1IXU8!8 InIormaIionpont>le.(.naI_....~...I9gIIy~docuT1enI """" 'wi Jeffrey And Tara Tobin MH 00-002 Community Development ~ Geographic Information Systems Map prepared December 19, 2000 V / / ~ This. pattern indicates subject parcel Thismoopl'lllabeencornpHdlorlJØlW..pI8nnin;rId.-enoopo.lPl)efltO/Vy N ~......:yollor1l'111abeen_lOpr0Yid8hmoolCUT.....rJd~ Í'IOITTIaIlonp<mibl8._iII......~Io<.......~bìdogdocurNo:1t '" '" '" .. ;>- .. '" rFJ = Q .. .... .. 5 .. .s = .... '" :E = c. .. .. ..0 .. Q !OJ)E-o Q .. '" .. í-' .. ,E-o =O<! ë ~ c...!: Q... "¡j~ ~ .. Q.s ;>-'N .-:: Q = 0 = ' 58 5 ' Q:I: u~ ... .. Q .s ........ ;; :: 5 !OJ) 1:: = C!;t :.= ß' .¡;; .¡Q ~ ~ ...., '''~='Ol; --" 0 . -- iN '" 0 N .0 0 00 QO lie: M 0 0 0 M !::! M 0 0 0 0 - N 0 '" 0 0 M N i¡~ ~ ~ N d-. ,;, ~ ...... '¡N c..Lf"'-. N - r- :! on on ·-li~ on - '" M '" M - ..,. M M ..,. N'IM M N M M - M M^< '" , 1;; .... ...¡ ...¡ ...¡ ...¡ >< ...¡ rFJ .... .... .... .... z .... ~ () 0 1[.8 ç:§] ~¡~ ~ [!.8 û~.8 .~:'E 0 Þi!~.g¡·~ ~~~~ .- d~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ::s v i¡;¿!iºOOO ~..;¡: .E Ii ii '" ii~ ¡j"'O '"0 ij"¡¡ ",":: rI1!!~ ~ g rI1d...... N J::: ¡~I!~] ~ .....¡'OO ..... ..... "011810 ~ ';,,~_ll,~J~ M : ]1 '..".il . ëll~ CIS¡; 0 Z¡lO . . ,¡~ . ';;11 ~ ~ji~, Z·!u '0 o 00 " ",ciJ .,::'" '" > "¡j@ 0;:: " " 0 "'" ¡:a:ã ~ gu Non 000 - r- ~ ;¡: ~ ê N '" N~ -;;~ O(/J >00 _ on "'C!~ ,0:::,'- ê '" o ~, ,.0. Ii Nil~ ~!!:;; 5:,] ~d~ i ~ 'E o z ~~ ''; ..ê '" 0 ¡:¡~ ¡g 'S .' c; o ~.~ (';j ~ ~ " 0 ~ ",.;j¡- 'E ~.~ ~(/» .eJ 2 .... ~ t::~ .a .~ " t: - 0 ~z '110 Q .... .. .. E-o '\0 r-- M 000 000 000 ON NOO 000 000 :;M""'" _ M ..,. '''=t N :0 I.(') ON 00 00 00 00 OM 00 00 .M ..,. N -..,. on", o - ..,. '" M 00 OiO 00 '0 o 00 00 M _ N N M M ..,. 0 0-__ - "1""'1""1"~'<:to:::t '- ST. 't'àCi'Ê COÚNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA JANUARY 9.~()Ol TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County land Development Code and in accordance with the provIsions of the St. lox:ie County ComprehensIve Plan, that the foltoWing applicants hove requested 'hot the St. Lucie County Boord of County Comminionet"s consIder their request as follows; 1. MBTB, Inc. Mr. Sam Bdnk, f()l'" <:I Conditionol Use Permit 10 ollaw the construction of 3,192 sqfJ(lre foot conve- nience store with gosollne facility and automatic cor wosh for the following desalbed property: loh 1 through 5, Block 178, of lakewood Park. Unit 1 2A. According to the plot thereof, as recordad In-plat book 11 at Page 37 of Public Records of St. Lucie County, fl (Taxld No. 1301·615-0200-0007 1 301-615-01 98-0009 1301-615-0197-0002) Location, Ead side of Turnpike Feed_ Read, the northeast corner of Mlramar Avenue and Tumplke feeder Rood 2. The Fort Pierce AIr Cent_ has apPlied for a Major ....d!ustment to their eJtlsting Conditional Use opemtions at the St. Lucie County IntematlOl1al Alrp,ort. following described property, COMMENCE ....T THE SOUTHWEST_ CORNER Of SEC- TION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST RUN SOUTH 89°31'34" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON':THe-J'SOÜTH LINE, Of SAID SECTION: THENCE RUN NORTH 00°26'26", EAST 625.11 FEET PARAllEL FEET TO THÉ WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO A POINT: THENCE RUN SOUTH 87"51'3.4" EAST 36.09 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT' BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING¡ FROM SAiD POINT OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH 87"51'34" EAST 36.09 FEET TO'A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE, POINT OF' BEGINNING; FROM SAID Po.INTBEGNNING RUN SOUTH 87°51'34" EAST 668.83 FEET; TO_ A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 45°1 S26" EAST 515.68 ·FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 44°42'34- WEST 1314.92 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE PC Of A CURVE- CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A DELTA ANGLE Of 30°04'00" AND A RADIUS Of 1294.52 fEET; THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHERLY DIREC- TION ALONG THE ARC Of SAID CURVE 678.55 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN sqUTH45"'17'26" WEST 1 00 FEET TO A POiNT; THENÇE RUN SOUTH 00°22'26" WEST 540.00 FEET TO A POINT ; S....ID: POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AU LYING IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP_ 34 SOUTH, RANGE40: ~~ ' (Port of Tax I.D.. No.1 '"'30_131_0001-000/4) {Location: St. lu~ie County Int~ional AIrport; HongOf' 41 ~BUNE ~ 3. JEfFREY AND TARA TOBIN. for a cion A Mobile I Home to be permitted on 29.99 acr~ of land located in the AG-5 (Agricultural· 1 du/5 acres}for tne following described property; A PARCEL Of LAND BEGINNING FROM THE NORTH- WEST CORNER OF TiiE SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37, SOUTH, RANGE 37 EAST, ST LUCIE COUNTY, flORI· DA. RUN 89"47'40" E ALONG THE SECTION t,lNE FOR A DISTANCE OF 3317.1 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST~ ERl Y LINE OF EVANS PROPERTiES, INC.. FOR THE P.O.B, THENCE RUN S 30°44'17' E ALONG EVANS PROPERTIES, INC. PROPERTY LINE A DISTANCE OF 511 ~6 FEET. THENCE RUN S 59°05'54" W A DISTANCE OF 1436.53 FEET TO THE- EAST LINE OF BlUEFIELD ROAD; THENCE RUN N 35"36'50" W ALONG BLUE- FIELD ROAD A DISTANCE Of 890.62 FEET; THENCE RUN N 59°05'5,"," E A DISTANCE Of 1.506.79 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE·OF EVANS PROPERTIES INC., THENCE RUN S .30°44'17' E ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERl'f lNE Of EVANS PROPERTIES INC. A DISTANCE OF_ 373.36 FEET TO THE P.O.B lYING IN AND COMPRISING A PART Of SECTIONS 10 AND 1 S. TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH RANGE 37 EAST IN S1 LUCIE COUNTY Tax Id. 4110-433-0020-0016 LocatIon: 10280 Bluefield Road PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the Courriy Commls~ sian Chambers, 3rd Roar of the Roger Poitras AdminislTa~ lion AnneJt Building, 2300 V'wglnia Avenue, fort Pi«ce, Florida on Jal"lUOf'y 9, 2001, beginning ot 7;00P.M. or as soon thereaft_ as possible.· . PURSUANT TO Sedion· 286.0105, Florida Statutes, If a person decides to appeai any decision made by 0 boord, agency. ex- commission wIth respect to any mattw consId- ered at a meeting CK hearing. he will need a r~d of the proceedings. and that, for such purpose, h. may need to ensu,. that a-verbatim record of the proceedings is mode, which rKOrd I"dudes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMiSSIONERS ST. WOE COUNTY, FlORIDA_ ,/5/ FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, CHAIRMAN Publish: D~mber 29, 2000 2049477 JZ-ZqÞDo -- . ~ . Agenda Request """ '-' Item Number Date: _1:) I") January 9, 2001 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ J [ [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] To: Board of County Commissioners Submitted By: Community Development Director SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 01-002 approving the request of MBTB, Inc" for a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Site Plan approval to allow for the construction of a 3,192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps and an automatic car wash to be known as Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road. (File No.: MNSP-OO- 025 and CU-00-010) BACKGROUND: MBTB, Inc" has applied for a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Site Plan approval for a new 3,192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps and an automatic car wash to be known as Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road. This new gasoline station will be located on the northeast corner of Miramar Avenue and Turnpike Feeder Road. The subject property is located in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 0, with four members absent (Mr. Moore, Mr. Hearn, Mr. Trias and Mr. Grande), recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit at its December 13, 2000 meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 01-002, subject to the cited conditions contained therein, COMMISSION ACTION: [JU APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER CONCURRENCE: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: ¡Â/ Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND538a) """ ...., COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: January 9,2001 Resolution 01-002 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To; Board of County Commissioners Community Development Director January 2, 2001 Petition of MBTB Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Site Plan approval to allow for the construction of a 3, 197 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps and an automatic car wash, to be known as Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road, in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District (File No,: CU-OO-OlO and MNSP-OO-025) From: Date: Subject: The subject property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Miramar A venue and Turnpike Feeder Road, in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. The purpose of the Conditional Use Permit is to allow for the construction and operation of a 3,192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps and an automatic car wash, to be known as Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road. On October 2, 2000, MBTB, Inc., submitted an application for a minor site plan and conditional use permit for a 3, 192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps and an automatic car wash on a I. 8 acre land parcel. On November 15,2000, the Development Review Committee found that the minor site plan met all technical review requirements. Upon the Development Review Committee finding that the applicant's request for minor site plan approval met technical requirements, the applicant's request for a Conditional Use Permit was processed, At this time, a review of the Conditional Use Permit finds that the request will not adversely affect the surrounding areas. The property to the north is vacant and zoned for commercial neighborhood uses, The property to the south is developed as the Indrio Crossings Shopping Center and zoned CG (Commercial, General). The property to the west is developed as a commercial use and zoned CN (Commercial Neighborhood). To the east is a residential subdivision, which is zoned RM-5 (Residential Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre). The applicant worked with Staff during the design stage of the project in order to preserve a portion of the native vegetation that exists on the site. The proposed design provides for a native vegetative buffer along Miramar A venue and the Turnpike Feeder Road and also adjacent to the northern property line. In addition, the applicant is proposing to supplement the existing native vegetative buffers with additional vegetative materials. At the December 13, 2000, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 0, with four members absent (Mr. Moore, Mr. Trias, Mr. Hearn and Mr. Grande) recommended approval of this petition as set forth in Draft Resolution OF002, subject to the following condition: I. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed structure or buildings on this site, all exotic vegetation found on the site shall be removed, During the Planning and ?:oning Commission Public Hearing, the Board discussed the potential survivability of the existing trees that are located within the buffering adjacent to the entrance on Miramar A venue and located within the interior landscape islands. According, to Amy Mott, Natural Resource Coordinator, the '-' ...., January 2, 2001 Page 2 Subject: Conditional Use Permit - Hess Turnpike/Feeder Road File No.: CU-OO-010 and MNSP-00-025 applicant will be required to ensure that the root balls on the trees are not damaged to the extent that it will be fatal to the trees. The proposed Conditional Use Permit, subject to the recommended condition, meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11,07,03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends the approval of this petition for a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Site Plan approval to allow the construction of a 3,192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps and an automatic car wash in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District for property located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Miramar A venue and Turnpike Feeder Road, as set forth in Draft Resolution 01 -002 which includes the recommended conditions, SUBMITTED: ~. JJL~ a Shewchuk, AlCP mmunity Development Director ¡Sics cc: MBTB Greg Boggs, Thomas Lucido & Associates File '-' ...., 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 RESOLUTION 01-002 FILE NO.: CU-OO-010 and MNSP-OO-o25 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MINOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 3,192 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH FIVE GASOLINE PUMPS AND AN AUTOMATIC CAR WASH TO BE KNOWN AS HESS STATION - TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD IN THE CN (COMMERCIAL, NEIGHBORHOOD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY lOCATED IN ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. MBTB. Inc.. presented a petition for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 3,192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps and an automatic car wash, to be known as Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road, in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District for the property described in Part B. 2. On December 13, 2000, the 81. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereinafter described request for a Conditional Use Permit in CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning for the property described in Part B. 3. On January 9,2001, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing anotice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the 81. Lucie County Land Development Code. File No,: CU-00-010IMNSP-00-025 January 2, 2001 Resolution 01-002 Page 1 1 5. 2 3 4 5 6, 6 7 8 7. 9 10 11 8. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 9. 20 21 22 23 24 10. 25 26 27 28 29 11. 30 31 32 33 12. 34 35 36 37 13. 38 39 40 41 14. 42 43 44 45 15. 46 ....... -...I The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. St. Lucie County Utilities will provide water and sewer services to the proposed project. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on January 9, 2001, Section 11.07 .05(B) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that all applications for Conditional Use Permit include a full site plan if the proposed use or development meets the submission requirements of Section 11.02.02 of the Land Development Code. SITE PLAN MBTB. Inc., presented a petition for a Site Plan approval to construct a 3,192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps and an automatic carwash, to be known as Hess - Turnpike Feeder Road, in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District for the property described in Part B. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the petition for a Minor Site Plan approval and found it to meet all technical requirements of the Land Development Code and to be consistent with the future land use maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the conditions set forth in Part D of this Resolution. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so_as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. St. Lucie County Utilities will provide water and sewer service to the proposed project. File No.: CU-00-010\MNSP-00-025 January 2, 2001 Resolution 01-002 Page 2 '-' -' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 '16, A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on January 9, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a Conditional Use Permit for MBTB, Inc. to allow a 3,192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps and an automatic carwash, to be known as Hess _ Turnpike Feeder Road, in CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning and as depicted on the site plan drawings described in Part D, is hereby granted for the property described in Part B, subject to the conditions described in Part D. B. The property on which this Conditional Use Permit is being granted is described as follows: Lots 1 thru 5, Block 178, of Lakewood Park Unit 12A; according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 37 of the Public Records of 51. Lucie County, Florida. (Location: Northeast corner of the intersection of Miramar Avenue and Turnpike Feeder Road) C. A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part D, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. SITE PLAN D. Pursuant to Section 11.02.09 and Section 11.07.05(B) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Minor Site Plan for the project to be known as Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road be, and the same is hereby, approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Thomas Lucido & Associates, dated October 27,2000 and last revised on December 2,2000 and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Director on December 4, 2000, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the_proposed structure or buildings on this site, all exotic vegetation found on the site shall be removed. E. The property on which this site plan approval is being granted is described in Part B of this Resolution. File No,: GU-00-010IMNSP-00-025 January 2,2001 Resolution 01-002 Page 3 1 2 F. 3 4 5 6 7 8 G. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 H. 18 19 20 21 22 23 I. 24 25 26 27 28 J, 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 '- ...., The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution are for the purpose of obtaining building permits on this property and shall expire on January 9, 2002, unless the developer has obtained a building permit approval for the first phase of the site plan described in Part D or an extension has been granted in accordance with Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The Conditional Use Permit and Minor Site Plan approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, MBTB, Inc., including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to: the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B of this Resolution. The Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use/Site Plan approval. Should the Conditional Use/Site Plan approval granted by this Resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. The conditions set forth in Part D are an integral nonseverable part of the site plan approval granted by this Resolution. If any condition set forth in Section D is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted by this resolution shall become null and void. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part D, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. Further, the Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this Resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson xxx Vice-Chairman Doug Coward xxx Commissioner John Bruhn xxx Commissioner Paula Lewis xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx File No.: CU-00-010\MNSP·00-025 January 2, 2001 Resolution 01-002 Page 4 ""'" ...., 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 9th Day of January 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney cs H:IWPICondit¡onal Uses/Hess Tunpike Feeder RoadlAgendas/Resolution.doc File No.: GU-00-010IMNSP·00·025 January 2, 2001 Resolution 01-002 Page 5 ........ ....I St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes December 13, 2000 Commission Chambers at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Matthes, Mr. McCurdy, Mr. Hearn, Mr. Jones, Mr. Lounds MEMBERS ABSENT: NIr, Hearn, Mr. Trias, Mr. Grande OTHERS PRESENT: NIr. Kelly, Ms. Young, Mr. Kelly, Ms, Lewis, Ms. Snay December 13.2000 page 1 '-' ...., AGENDA ITEM 2: FILE NO. CU 00-010 MBTB, INC Ms. Snay stated that Agenda Item #2 is the application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 3, 192 square foot convenience store with 5 gasoline pumps serving 10 vehicle stations and an automatic car wash to be known as Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road in the CN (Commercial Neighborhood) Zoning District for property located at the comer of the Turnpike Feeder Road and Miramar Avenue. Mr. Boggs introduced himself as the Director of Thomas Lucido and Associates in Fort Pierce, He stated he is here to gain approval for this convenience store in Lake Park, There has been an approval from the Lake Park Association. This association reviewed the site plan and voted in approval of the site plan. They have a color rendering of the plans which will give a visual of what the facility will look like. The most significant part of this site plan is the incorporation of the native vegetation. As everyone knows there are many sites such as this one that does not save any vegetation. Mr. Boggs' client came to him and that was part of his program which naturally he supported. Mr, Boggs micro-sited the station and saved the most significant trees which will also include under storage preservation in the site development plan. The only thing left after that is grass which will be dry retention, not wet retention. The white area on the plan is circulation and parking. The areas in a darker green is all the upland preservation. The smaller circles on the plan is what is being proposed for the required landscaping for the hedge, trees and so forth. Basically staff is supporting this, particularly since the trees are being preserved. That is one of the main reasons why he wanted to assist the developer getting through the approval process. He will be happy to answer any questions or listen to any concerns at this time. Chainnan Matthes asked if there is a legend on the plan that shows the trees that are nati ve to the site being saved as opposed to just the size. Mr. Boggs replied that the ones with the "X" in the caliper those are the trees that will be preserved. These are predominantly Laurel Oak trees. This is a great site with cabbage palm, Laurel Oaks and a few Bays. The only area towards the back on the east side that has exotic and some Brazilian Pepper but the front is covered with native plants. Mr. McCurdy stated that he feels like this is becoming a very nature sensitive site there. He asked what will be done for signage because it appears to be very well screened all the way around, He asked if the signage would be a large vertical sign. Mr. Boggs replied that there would be a low-level lit monument sign. He stated that he failed to show the' architectural work as suggested by staff. This was done by an architect that worked with the developer in Miami. There will be wall mounted interior lit cabinet signs, other than that this store will not be heavily signed. Mr. Jones asked if the site grading had been evaluated to see if the existing vegetation can be kept. December í3, 2000 page 3 '-' ...., Mr. Boggs replied in the affirmative stating that the engineer worked closely in order to maintain the grade to make sure that the dry retention in the first floor parking lot would allow the trees showing to be saved. Mr. Lounds asked what was on the north side of the property. Mr. Boggs replied that there was wooded vacant land across the street. Mr. Lounds asked how the Oak Trees would be protected in the back of the site from compaction. Mr. Boggs replied that what they are trying to do is install the curb banier with the existing grade. There will most likely be compaction on this side. He feels that the tree will survive, l\!lr. Lounds stated the County is very sensitive about Oak Trees. Mr, Boggs stated he and his client are very aware of that and that is the reason for saving all of these trees. Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing. He stated that there was a letter sent in from a property owner and he asked it be read in to record. Ms. Lewis, Secretary read letter from Mr. Carl Cunningham into record (attached), Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Merritt stated that in reference to the letter on Lot 14, he would like to know if there are houses on that block or on that particular lot. Mr. Kelly replied that there does not appear to be any house on that lot. Mr. Lounds stated he is still a little concerned on how the trees will be saved. The saving grace for him is that the company that Mr. Boggs is representing does a wonderful job maintaining this site. He is very concerned on the life expectancy on the Laurel Oaks with the compaction that is going to take place. He woúld like to know what Mr, Boggs feels is the life expectancy of the Laurel Oaks a year from now. Mr. Boggs replied that they have done this before where trees were preserved in small islands and parking lots. He stated that one thing that could be considered is to put in a-drain pipe that would go out in to the asphalt drive on that side to alliviate that compaction. He stated that Laurel Oaks are short lived normally up to 50 - 60 years. He stated that there was a barrier between the service and the rear in an effort to preserve these trees. It is not a mandate or requirement to save that type of tree. He would like to save those trees and is attempting to save them. December 13,2000 page 4 ."""'" ...., Mr. Lounds stated that he does not want to complicate the situation and run expenses up anymore than they already are. He asked Mr. Boggs if he felt he was doing everything that could be done through placements. Mr. Boggs replied in the affirmative. Mr. Kelly stated that everything discussed this evening will be in the minutes and reviewed by the County Commission before the January 9,2001 meeting. Therefore the same issues will likely be raised at that meeting. He asked if Mr. Boggs could get with Ms. Mott, the Resource Protection Coordinator, to work out the best situations for that. Mr. Lounds stated that he did not want to make an advertisement for Hess Stations or Mr. Boggs, but they both are good stewards of what they do. He stated that Hess does maintain a step above in their quality of landscape and the landscape. He stated that Mr. Boggs comes from a reputable company that does look out for things such as this. He does not want to complicate the thinking of the Board of County Commissioners but it is a question that needs to be addressed. Mr. Kelly stated that there will be an answer by the Board of County Commission meeting. Chairman Matthes asked for the Staff recommendation. Ms. Snay stated that staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the following condition: I.) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed structure or buildings on this site, all exotic vegetation found on the site shall be removed. Chairman Matthes asked if there were any further questions of staff. Mr. Merritt asked if there would be sewer and water on this site. Mr. Boggs replied that it will be St. Lucie County Utilities for both services. December 13. 2000 page 5 '- ...., Mr. Jones stated that after considering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, 1 hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of MBTB, 1NC. for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 3,192 square foot convenience store with 5 gasoline pumps and an automatic car wash facility in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District, because he feels it is an appropriate use of the site and the planners have done a very goodjob preserving vegetation on the site. Mr. Merritt seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously. December 13, 200ö page 6 c '-' :c- - ...., fi?cs 4!R I> ¿5 ,c:- . (' ¿> ¿.J .~ T >-- C ð d.f H /-J' J /' 6 ~ é'é<..r' ---~- -- --- 5¡:C/,¿V,eO Y6 c.->.--(é ~¿:rr~/1.... dA--þ,¿'éð'-_?!P"'<:=Jð fißO<-,?' /7 /r<¿S'f C/7J S.o~~T/O/~ CJ~ /£0)p--£<"r C¿<.-> Sc /.b /?/r-~ Ç4/í£'[Æ./ððO ,P/?~(<::. U 1"--'/ ~ /:2 17' 8,/..1<;" )7 ,F/-ó T /yfr.4/ /_-y13/--' ~ .£ A~ h /-",,0 r / vfrp¡. ¿.-1:3 /.2/ ð ~ ,T/L'/-s-; /¡ý'ê ~ ç /'" , {),.c:=. S ;n,-?/ /<--(:' b'~6/-.//,--,,/'t. ,4. -..S"/r' iY/? / /' /~T./?~Q:.. ~-1:" ,:v¿ _ /-;',/ /- [ -r-0;z Ó~ý h ,f"¢?-/""", ¿:) /'/r/~= /3 ,4 ß,4-£> ~'~.P.¥" 5'/7 <!.IT'" d),'A....-- //(;Pð-<P7'ý d) u..J /'-'/--'~J', 77/-£ tA./ ð -t' £' f tV 4-../' Þ<-/ /-r"¿:-:. ~ Y "" <.J ¡::'-VT /;7'- 'S¿v~>,. ~Dr S:/.c::-e ..c 4'-Æ't:J ;;?.ø~./~,..:;. tß ('--' /4 Y r £ Y ,6~TY .2>-/7/T//" þ 7?//E 5/,¿J-/-E' ð~ qp~£ ,-?/¿"'c..e- //'Ýêk'r ,S',<c-d<.--¿'O 5<J2-.S"öF1C Jr,.ç~ /'Pu,L.-ê's- ð/'- /?",6'CV C,.,<o../'=- /7b4-.s .5"'//97/../.... é'/9A-- ðe /,6> /~éJV5FJ /J/"'¿) o'"T,/¡/¿-< /U¿¡,L."" .-5' ,?""VÆ'Cs/ ¿~ê /7""/7'-"C ~/..s //-" A1 x: c ~A'..( C V r-/'--'/ /"'"" &:',/-/ /? ~ ___¿ -.:5 V/ ß Þ",.Á /'1 ð..,...... r 5' ~ ß>·+-'7'~4"6Rr µy //7ót;;; P/c:....? pðØ 6 i~ r~~-~t Œ_ ~ JlLŒlœ I ! '. : DEC I 2 - u I ., I" CIIIIU ~ . " - _--.J ~ cu--~~' -~ ·'-'/t-LOPi\tiENT - .' "( 'L .. - TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: LOCATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: '-' ...., PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 12/13/00 File Number CU-OO-OlO and MNSP-OO-025 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Manager {~G December 7, 2000 Application ofMBTB, Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 3,192 square foot convenience store with 5 gasoline pumps serving 10 vehicle stations and an automatic car wash, to be known as Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. Northeast corner of the intersection of Miramar Avenue and Turnpike Feeder Road. CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) LAND USE DESIGNATION: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: RU (Residential Urban) I. 8 acres A 3,192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps serving 10 vehicular stations and an automatic car wash. CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) to the north and west; RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) to the east; CG (Commercial, General) to the south. SURROUNDING LAND USES: FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: illILITY SERVICE: RU (Residential Urban) to the north, east and west; COM (Commercial) to the south. Station #7 (4900 Ft. Pierce Boulevard) is located approximately one mile to the west. St. Lucie County Utilities will provide water and sewer services to this site. '-' -...I December 7, 2000 Page 2 Petition: Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road File No.: CU-OO-OlO and MNSP-00-025 TRANSPORT A TION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: See Comments SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: See Comments TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity, ********************** This petition is for a combination of Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval. As such, it is required to satisfy both the standards of review found in Section 11.07.03 and Section 11.02.09 of the County's Land Development Code. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use and minor site plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use has been determined to not be in conflict with any applicable provision of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.03(Q)(7), CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District, allows establishments with the primary use of a convenience store to sell gasoline as a conditional use. As noted in the comments below, the proposed site development plan that accompanies this request for a conditional use permit has been determined to meet the minimum standards of the Land Development Code. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; - The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The proposed site is located within an area zoned for neighborhood commercial businesses. To the east of the subject site are single-family residential properties. The applicant through, the site design process, has attempted to mitigate any negative effects to these residential properties. The proposed five gasoline pumps will be located along the western property line and front the Turnpike Feeder Road. Negative impacts to the residential properties will be minimized by the construction of the proposed convenience store and through the installation of an eight (8 ') foot high opaque fence with landscaping. Impacts to the south and north of the subject property will be minimized through the '-' -...I December 7, 2000 Page 3 Petition: Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road File No.: CU-OO-OlO and MNSP-OO-025 preservation of existing native vegetation located at the intersection of Miramar A venue and Turnpike Feeder Road and along the northwestern property line, The properties located to the south and west of the subject property were developed as commercial uses (Kings Highway Shopping Center - South and Butterfield Drngs - West). The property to the north is designated as neighborhood commercial and is currently vacant. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. St. Lucie County Utilities will be providing water and sewer services to the subject parcel. The Turnpike Feeder Road, a state roadway, has been determined to currently operate at a Level of Service Standard of C, immediately adjacent to the project site. The applicant, based upon the proposed square footage, is not required to submit a traffic impact analysis for the project. The right-of-way width for the Turnpike Feeder Road facility is currently 100 feet in this area. This roadway facility will eventually be widened along its entire length. In the vicinity of the subject parcel, the existing right-of-way width is sufficient to meet the road aIigmnent and required right-of- way width. Therefore, the subject parcel will not negatively impact the existing roadway facility. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create significant adverse impacts on the natural enviromnent. The developer has proposed to minimize any adverse impacts on the natural enviromnent through the preservation of significant native vegetation along the southwest and northwest property lines. These preservation areas will provide visual buffering for this site and provide habitat for birds along this roadway corridor. ******************** STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT/SITE PLAN REVIEW In addition to the minimum standards of review and project development set out in Section 7.00.00, Section 11.02.07, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum Standards of Review for all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for Minor Site Plan approval, utilizing these requirements and notes the following: I. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN '-' .....,¡ December 7, 2000 Page 4 Petition: Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road File No.: CD-OO-OlO and MNSP-OO-025 The proposed Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St, Lucie County, and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. The proposed Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. These policies include, but are not limited to: Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes a maximum lot coverage, for the commercial future land use designation, by structures as 40% - 50%. The proposed project is to be developed at 10% lot coverage. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. Policy 1.1.8,5 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan requires effective visual and light diffusion barriers between residential and non-residential uses. The proposed project will have an eight (8') foot high opaque fence and landscaping surrounding it to the east abutting the existing residential properties. This fence and landscaping is intended to reduce the encroachment of commercial uses into residential uses. 2. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES I. The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse affect upon nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed Hess - Turnpike Feeder Road Station has been determined not to have an undue adverse effect upon nearby properties. The proposed project abuts a vacant commercially roned property to the north, and developed commercial properties to the south and west. The properties to the north and south will be provided buffering thorough the preservation of existing native vegetation. The developer has utilized the placement of the convenience store to provide a buffer from the use and the residential properties to the east. This segment of the Turnpike Feeder Road has a right-of-way width of 100 feet. The proposed expansion and realignment of this roadway facility will nO! affect the subject property, The Turnpike Feeder Road roadway facility operates at a Level-of-Service C north of lndrio Road. There is sufficient available capacity on this roadway facility to meet the needs of the proposed project. 2. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. ........ ...., December 7, 2000 Page 5 Petition: Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road File No.: CV-OO-OIO and MNSP-00-025 The developer has designed this project in a manner that will buffer the commercial properties to the north, south, and west through the preservation of native vegetation along the northwestern and south and western property lines, The placement of the convenience store will provide a visual buffer from the proposed project and the residential properties to the east. The developer will also be installing an eight (8') foot opaque fence with landscaping along the eastern property line this will provide an increased buffer for the residential properties. 3. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged. and operated so as not to inteifere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of the neighboring properties. The properties to the south and west are developed as commercial uses. To the north is vacant/undeveloped neighborhood commercially zoned properties. To the east are residentially zoned properties. C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public Facilities. The subject property will receive water and sanitary sewer services through the 5t. Lucie County Utilities. D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written confi17l1Lltion, or has otherwise demonstrated by substantial credible evidence, that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. The applicant has obtained from the 51. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written confirmation that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES The proposed building or use will be served by adequate school facilities The applicant is proposing a commercial use which will not impact school facilities. F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section 11. 02. 09(A) (5). the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County "'- ...., December 7, 2000 Page 6 Petition: Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road File No.: CU-OO-OlO and MNSP-OO-025 Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, "Natural Envirorurænt Analysis ", of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Hom andAssociates, Inc. (August 1982). The subject property is less than 10 acres in size, therefore, it does not trigger the thresholds for submitting an environmental impact report. The developer is proposing to preserve a large amount of the existing native vegetation found on site. The areas proposed for preservation will be located along Miramar Avenue and the Turnpike Feeder Road and along the northwestern property line. These native vegetative buffers will provide visual buffering for the surrounding areas. COMMENTS The petitioner, MBTB, Inc., is seeking approval for a conditional use permit in order to construct and operate a 3,192 square foot convenience store with five gasoline pumps, serving 10 vehicle stations and an automatic car wash facility for property located on the east side of the Turnpike Feeder Road at the northeast corner of the intersection of Miramar Avenue and the Turnpike Feeder Road in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. The project will be known as Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road. Retail businesses providing gasoline sales are permitted as conditional uses in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners. Staff fmds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St, Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the foUowing condition: I, Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed structure or buildings on this site, aU exotic vegetation found on the site shall be removed. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment cs cc: MBTB, Inc. Greg Boggs, Thomas Lucido & Associates File ...... -...I Section 3,01.03 Zoning District Use R~gulations ( Q, CN COMMERCIAL. NEIGHBORHOOD 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for limited retail trade and service acbvities covering a relatively small area and that is intended to serve the popuiation living in surrounding neighborhoods_ The number in '0' following each identified use corresponds to the SiC code reference described in Section 3,01.02(B), The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2,00,00 of this code, 2. Permitted Uses a, Beauty and barber services, (123/724) b. Civic, social and fraternal associations (064') c. Depository institutions (60) d, laundering and drycleaning (self-service). (1215) e. Real estate (65) f. Repair services: (1) Electrical repair. (162) (2) Shoe repairs (125) (3) Watch, clock, jewelry, and musical instrument repair. (76") g, Retail trade (each building shall be less than 6,000 square feet gross floor area, all uses inclusive): (1) Antiques ('932) (2) Apparel and accessories. (56) (3) Books and stationery, (594215943) (4) Cameras and photographic supplies. (594') (5) Drugs and proprietary. (S012) (6) Eating places (5812) (7) Florists. (5992) (8) Food stores (54) (9) Gifts, novelties, and souvenirs. ('947) (10) Hobby, toy and game shops ('94') (11) Household appliances (572) (12) Jewelry, (5944) (13) Newspapers and magazines, (,...) (14) Optical goods, (5"') (15) Nurseries, lawn and garden supplies. (526) (16) Radios, TVs. consumer electronics and music supplies (573) (17) Sporting goods and bicycles. (S94') (18) Tobacco products. (S"3) h. Video tape rental (104) 3, lot Size Requirements lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. Adopted August 1. 1990 114 Revised Through 06101/00 '-' ...., Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use R.egulations 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements ( Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7,09,00. 7. Conditional Uses a. Car Washes (Self Service Only) - subject to the provisions of Section 7.10,22. (999) b. Day care - adult (8322) - child (8351) c. Postal services. (4311) d, Retail trade: (1) Gasoline services - accessory to retail food stores under SIC-5411, (999) (2) Undistilled alcoholic beverages accessory to retail sale of food, (5921-Ex_'o<"_) e. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10,23 (999) 8, Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00,00 and include the following: a. b. Drinking places (undistilled alcoholic beverages) accessory to an eating place, (999) One dwelling unit contained within the commercial building, for on-site security purposes. (999) ( Adopted August 1,1990 115 Revised Through 08/01/00 § . I ....,.¡ "'" --- z · E 0 ~ . 0 " ~ 0 . " " Eo\' ,; " c. , . o " · .. 0 l I ",.' > .- 0 . · , ",Q:~(,~ Q E 0 x 0 ~ . · ¡ ~ 0 I .- - t T""' " " · , Ü 0- · , 0 a .~ t C I E~ · " o "- ~ ò 0 u . . · · 0 , œ ro 0 " · I- 0 " ro => " - 2 0 , ~ , ~" ,¡ 3z :5 " ~ .. ,~~w o . . ~ ~ ~ '" ~ => 0 U a: w ;:: a: ~ :=! '" ~ 0 ~ QYOW~ -õYòi7.iffiiBiõ~ I ~" 1""" "".., :, g ~ 0I0I1HCI'IOH "If» I ! ~" H01""'" 0, J ~ ~ Of 011 01]10<5 r g ,." ,.." li.õli~i.ji¡Y¡¡-- ç z => o u w z ¡:: ~ ::;; ''',- ", " D " '" ! El"·J ", '''~, ""'" ~ lYNVJ ~ " ~ g ..J ,- / / /'3' ~~// / ,!'ft / I w ~ " '" '" / //~\ / / / S ..., 1 S !ii£ 1 s " \ ~ A1NnO::J 3380H::J33>10 ffiIIII]] This pattern indicates subject parcel cu ....... ...., MBTB, Inc. I 00-010 Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised November 28 .2000 ThIomaphu-.comp-.cIfŒgenoor..pIiorwW1ond..-..,.,_....... ~--,.-'IorIhu__loptOWidlolho,...,.¡CUTVltond'""""'... N nb'rnúon poublø,t.....inIe<'dod Ia"_ "..lIybncllng (I<x;urroen Zoning " " n ~ " " " " Banyan Street " " n I ~ I " >J " " Son Carlos Drive ß " n " /2 I] 14 IS James Road IS 14 IJ /2 Ir r A 8 I r, I ~ ;'-t Miramar Avenue 19 18 fl ~ /2 IJ 14 " Santo Barbaro Dr I /1 J /2 IS /4 ; " " , 8 , CN ,~ , cu "~~,,~J'" 1RU'j; , " 'I llt_1J.. v~ '" ", I II vr"4 L ßç:. 0/0 " ; "/ I ''Õ®~ .¡. "ß ~o~ ' a ' , OrtYOI1 (0 '\, ',18" Street ?::P "17" "- 0<:' " " " " <? " 16" '\. /5' " , , , , " - " " ~ (/] c :.c E- o o >, o ~ .c '" I c " " ~ '-' " ' "'... , Q'I ...... ..,...... .~ '- ...... :::s::!'..., ~...... "- ... ... ... ......, 2', ... ... , r-- / I~l iJ Q. <t - o z " B (/] o c o U " c :.c "' c ~ (/] 00-010 '-' MBTB, Inc. ìJ " " ,,¢ 0' '" ,Oò¡ «-°A ~< ",I> ~'" >J " " , , , 8 , ", , " , '" , , :o~. 8' , , . , " ',7 " ", f' ' , ¡( , !" 1'" , I ' , 2 , , , Miromar Avenue - CG ,r..., / , , " / , l '. / , / , ' '--'" []]]]]] This pattern indicates subject parcel ...'" <' Çj <>0 -f'0 -...I " Po rlrway , " '" , , , , " 2 , " , ' " , ~ ~~ ~ " J , InT-- I I IJ / /2 U ,I I , , ' , , ~ , , , " ' 8 , , , , :;V" ... ~ ... " . 1-___ , , I , " ' " , ~'W,~ , ''-I , , J 2' , , , , , 8 . , 8 ,/ - -- , " , , , , " , " , ~ ~. ,- 0:; C .0 " , « 0 "'.,,'" (/] . :5 n 11 % I. \ VI~ o c "I . J I ~ I I I I I ~ 10 I 9 18 ;1 l 6 5 14 J _.J I I 1- _...:./- 58\ 59 60 6f ,16- _':._~ \ ! i /j 51 Y " -, I ::J '<f I 56 I 2 J " ~ iš-I-;S- __ [ _ ~ J---!-.u- ~ 1- " II""'\, ... Z2 :" 20 :" E f--~-~ 1:J -<-+ "0 18 S2 o! ! a.... ~ I I 2 J ¡I, o 19 51 'VL. I >. _gT-[ I 020 50 ~ Zf20If9 "'------'-',,¡ I " " ---- " <8 Z! -q- -~---- Z< .. ! I ! f 12 J I ... _.J_-+_1. I I I Community Development t Geographic Information Systems Map revised November 26 ,2000 Thion-.p~~~Ior_"'pIrr¡i>gond............,._cWt. _--r.rtorl_-._lOpr".,;œ...mtHt........ond~ N ""orw.ttioo~_,I..I'oOI.,.~for......lIQIIYbn:Iir1g~. Land Use ~ 18 " ~ " " " " 14 " ~ V1 Banyan Street 19 " U ~ " c " " 14 '.C S!- o Son Car los Drive '" >- 0 ~ .c ~ 18 U $ '" I '2 " 14 " James Rood "' c '" '" -~ " " " 14 " " ü '- 8 . KJ " Miromar Avenue ~ 18 U ~ " fJ 14 " Santo Barbaro Dr .,. " I" " " 1 KJ " . 8 o Z õ c o U ,~ , cu 00-010 ffiI]]]] "'" ...., MBTB, Inc. " Banyon , c o KJ " '- " 11I1r-- '" I I f2 1 11 I I '- "- , Miromor Avenue COM ~r" / , ,/ -"-- ,I' '. " c '.C "' c ~ V1 I ,,,' " / '-..... ,/ '-.'" 2 8 8 7 KJ 7 , " , , " , 0; .0 ,: o V1 , , " , J " 2 " 2 $ " K) I 9 18 17 _.J I I s 1<4 J 1- 6.0 161 I I I " " 57 '" ~ C " > « J , l<f 156 fS-I-5; --"-- ~ I " 20 I~ I E u Õ " 0 0.. ~ , I 2 J I, 0 ~ ~ " I >- 0 I I 0 0 20 50 ~ lð 20 I~ <>: ü 22 ð " 22 '" I 2J " 1 12 I J I .. .J--t-l. 2< .. I I Community Development t Geographic Information Systems Map revised November 28 ,2000 This pattern indicates subject parcel ThIoII'8J '--. ~ b"g.norolploming _ rñnIn<:e_~. _-,9IIIorIr.._"-k>~tt.......<Ur«W.-.d~ N WormaIion~.llInat"""""'Ior.......IIog8IIybir'd<'Q~. r ì; ~l~r~~· T~T~IT N,I~II" ,1'1,'11 ;. ;:i~U Ib ¡g::51 i ....':0.,10\ :0\ 0\; i ILÑJL::::_J;;:lsL,! ¡!41t '!!; HBII...J! ""¡:..,J' , ':00':1.1;. ¡"j,l.Lr' " E ~ ~ '" ~ o :¡ E is u 'E.5 ~ af :£:~ ~:I; ~£i ~~ 9 I; 9 IE a.. 0.'" oZ -¡;:I; ãJ-g o .. ,~o ï: 9 ~o E9 E::> °u u~ õ.E c;; ~ ,- E...J " go .. .- 0.= ~ .. 0:1; -, I' gl U ""., >; . . ~;~: .~ Ñi I -~: i ~!: IZ; '~¡I ";1' i'Z li:11 'I..JL ::'''~:I'' ¡IN:! <'411 : E" ;ì~I:J ¡""!It; H~J!~L M ¡ ë;: i-; l~il.9 ;n5 ::..J)ø:I' " : -- : "-' 'lr :iŽ;; ,I....:.~ :: ~i! c¡ ¡..<,~; ::'-::'.< :;':u ! 115;: ¡ 'Iötlicl "0 ':'~ fi ¡_~,il~,:,~ a:¡:!N' ~ N <:¡;q, 'e;¡ '~ 'õ'ó ,.. . u u ,~ g "E':o 'c..,: >. . !ico è E Ü ~ "' z u > <>: 0;0, ; dii '; Q..~c...; 11')111')' 8;8: ......~~j,-, U!Ui ~!~l' °1° ! I ~i~ '2!"a .J::::...E:: .'. ,ë:iiæ '-"--'''[-- "" IN ~ ~ ~ ,~ Ó , , N'CO 0 ° N dlò 0 "'''', u'U' ",¡", U,U '" "', o 01 ~ tL >'>\ .1,111 .; I ¡ , ; ! -.-"t ;~ "" ~ ~ ,"" IN :0 õ ~ .. 0 0 0 0 ° ,0 ° 0 ~; 0 ~ ~ ~ N 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ,. ,Õ Õ Õ ¡; '. ~ ~ ~ 0 'b .... ,.. ..J >-¡~L..J; ~, ~I~~~- ~ ~ ë ~ ~;J: t >. t 0"',0 þ...C:U.L. ,5¡;; ~IE¡èi,èi 00'<'1! '" U¡..5. ~i ~ >! °'.01.0' I:.:JI~:P<'« .....:~IO,"T; )~iV)iô'õ! ,~~,M:Vì Vì . t-~~->r-T ip.¡ ic::l: 13:c::I ; q,¡i 1¡.~~: ,C1'__.'_ ,:§ å¡~'~' 1 ;UJiUi::E,j -I---"---r--'- . . ! ----1-- , ~' -' ~ ;¡; Ó ~Ig::i;:!;:¡; NIVì'OOiM' \0 \OINiO\' M-f")I""'r- ·j"·1 . O;OiO;O -¡---+ 00' ir-! ~ OO'~;O: NOOO'tr'li ~ eiifriic> ei, lei! ""1'+ 8181818' ~!ð:'~¡0! o:oloolð:' NiN¡....i.... 0;.'°,.°'1° VìIV"lIVì V"I :::Õ¡.~;·'ÕI'Õ õlõ/õ õ ......IMI<") M ?:!,;:-;"i;:::::,_=:, bQ~8 ! V"I õ ~ 0 '1 '1¡ '7 ~ ~ ~!~i ¡ ~ o:t ~ r..: l;!;~--~-~ ~f; B , , ' , liZ' I ¡~!~I , 1~I~j~i~1 . ".., ~.. ,_. ".._, ~j~ilU: j I ~j..8i ~I"O ,D, _,'_1 .... '-g1~io..'<£i ~;û5¡~:~i ;oCi ,..c:i..c: 101 UI ! ~i ~I i~¡~! J"g;'g 15' êl I",IIÆ! o:t'<t' .~E!.8.L_~! í I i I I 1 I I , ¡--,,11..1J·t _ l!tttl:_~~J 1 I I J ' III! j' I -""~;,, ~t : -l Jl_~,-: I I.' i I I' I II I I: ' I ' I I ' I 1 , ; iüjl~I~11 ¡ 1]1]1 I I'~ ~l t:: ff"fi: ~_,__ .19 _~~ ~ ¡ æ ë?_!__ ¡ 1 ¡ u ~ u ¡;; t o ,"-, ----",-~--, , , __i~'¡'__ ,,1·-- ! ! I 1 ! I r-oo' 0:0; 0,0 :S!S; :....'0 !818; N'....' i......:o:t i~l;;i- .........5, - ----1~l~Jþ,; I!J 0: i) i) iö:;';:ï: I~:~ µ";µ" ;"0 "0 '0:::'0::: . . ~: ~ ~':& IJ!I& '(ZI(Z :..... N N ~ ~ iN N """" MN ~~ d.,d-. .... "'''' .... M,M ¡' i I -,~-~~L ,0- 0 :~: e ¡P:Ä: it:it: 1&:& 0--- IOJ , ; ¡Z'"1:I I ;,5' ~II'< - :<I$i<.....·(Z¡ 1~¡.s)ËI'~; , c,g, .N/ 1~Vì!:¡~ "<::"N'O'\O loG~~i~'O - ·,+__~,I_:-;t" ~~-j-~t ; Ii! ! , i 1 , i , 01 ..5! -----, go , c¡) :.~ I ¡ ~ 0' U ;, 1 1~':i~O 5161 ig ~ ~]I rÆi]i I -::..;=+ . -"t--\-- g:1~1~1~! I~¡~¡õ!.' ~ ~iS;l;gi ~!~I;gj 00 \OiM ' t""I,r--_, f'"!ir-:¡"til:¡ ,r"!it; C!!. °'_1°'_; 1°10-1 - ".+---\---i-~j.-·..t-·_-j·--J.·_; O\iMi i~i l;ooIM;.....! NINI ' , 001.....'0' 00 00 c--.i.-:.' '.r---¡\0 io:tI &;1::0 ~!;gi !::::;!~;S f"'"!1r--: 0:0C!¡ ¡C"'!¡r--::~ 01-1 ¡~i 1°1°1..... --T---T~'---T---r--"f"-- , ......'r-iNio:tl 100'0\1 81818.81 Iglg' 8 N!OOI..... f""Ilr-1 N 0\100'81 ~;"" 8Põi8:0 õ'õl ~¡~¡õ¡~ ~ ~'I . \OI>OI\01N \0 \0, ! õ¡õiõ:~1 õ ~Iñ! _~.l~J~~L~~~l~~_~~~.L _ I I · <1-(, 1fi..J¡ ~I~' 1 :1l1E1 .. _..... ;:¡J.,~-!.-!,,"¡' e1~ ., ! , ì' E I ,; <I$! : ¡ j§: :~¡~: ..5'....: i.c: I..c: , '§i·t:' .!! I.!! , ·1' 0'18 OO'c::I' U nL_~ "'''''--'0'---1 : I i EI '«I! !, 1::~' I IQ'OI ~I §. ~'ì u l~ì~1 c, c ¡: >' ~ ~ ~ 8'818 ¡~Iftl '~~H--r . ~--(---.~ oolo:tlr-'\O 00:00'\0 INIt-¡Oi i~!~:::£! :""'\Oi-' l'<ti'<tiO\' !ei!t'>ÎiN I I 1 : f-----;----j----,·¡ I 1~'ì~1 j~I~~:L~1 :o,''<tIO\I ¡NiN, I I , I : UI u; ¡.51.6. ! j~ :-" ' ~i.~j 'I' ¡ ül.]iÈi 8j ,~i~ll I~J~:I¡~!~! -,.j.... ,+,L_h__ø,ro."; () '~¡ ;Cõ¡~¡~r I~¡~!~¡I~I~ Cix ~ ,b¡~I~! i31~!~ ~I~i ~( IVìiOOiM,. i..Mì'N'~:.\OI""I. :. '.¡~II~f~II'Ó'I~3¡:t.:g' ~:~i !8 ~i~1 !~¡~~i~i~! 6~! i~ OOIMI !eiIN'OO;~iei' eil !~¡Ó!;:¡! : t~, ¡d! ; ,,¡..-t~-[u I': -to I~ i '> '§18i.· l§i§l§i§!I'§!~ ¡';:;O_il~i i~ ~,811~ ~¡'éI o '00'0001 I~I;;;I : I~ ~1~ ~ ~ ,- !~1~!3! 1;;15i~l;; 5, .....\ :~~~I 01 [M!............'nMJ ~ ,-.;-;;:'~,!!-::~~ -;::~~.~·?·.::::h:'.2-:; ::¡; M "I ~ .. 1* !..J i.~ u ~' u' ä:'<I$ t:'-';:¡ ; 0 u '"-0 ,8.5 "'0: ..;.:: :~:~ g, l.g, ~ ê! i..c:·<<I$; i ~¡r-'::Z:: ~jNI~ o:~!P2' :8;0\101 "J~¡g!8) f' i_, ~i ! ~I ,"" i:2~; ---~¡----.s_---'>---r------ :~¡ 10. ; u' ,e !¡ ë: u ,U !~ i.2 I~ ;~- e .. '8 E I ':3:'<1$' I:;i~i ~i !~Lª';~_I iN'V"I ,aiM 'V"I'_ NIN i~:~ ;eil-: iN: '0 lei '<t ~ ooi 0;0001 0,0 ' :~!~ ~! \0 N 0: 8,8,8: lõ:~:Vìi !~:~,::ð ,0'0 0: ...... <") ,~! ° O~ ~ § 8 8~g '<t'0\ _ ......00 '1.'1 "'? , ~ 9 9 I ;!Iõõ ,~~ ~ ~ ~IU I o:t O\! 10\ 0\1 I "'.0\ a. 0\, I ~,~! L~<~ . !~ ~i~¡;;t;<I' ; ~". -ri-T"~T" '''·'4 ¡ i i ¡ : ' i I ¡ :: ..J'..J I :..,J I..J I ¡ '..JI..J:..Jr -J ' ~:~! iLl..}_lI:-J_' _;__~L~---i-¡J.,_}µ"; :.~1.2i , ~:¡¡ g <1.L U ..J'..J i)'i) r;J'r;J ö: ~ t: t: 1:: t' ,æ æ.2 &, u '~ u ~: t::i o '"- u'" ~¡ ~, '- c::I' 0. 0 5 !¡ '"-> ¡;; .. z 8 N "" " '" ¡¡ u. ~: .~ g¡,1 <1$1 ';:¡, ° ~ N' N ; ',5 ~ c;.g,1;, ~ o;!)(t,~: .3!i=i:;:! E !~I~:f.f)::: ~(ZjZi;:J!(Zi 'O\loo;Z,_¡ _;~.l~J~J~i , , <; · '2 :¡, o OJ, -r-- ,c , ~' · ..~"~"- , o;___j_' -I~t-"I <>: . ::; '<1$' ._+0..' I;;¡ 1<>:, ·2ì .~i E- ~¡ I~' j ;1'< L!...,..;c o ~' · i.e' Q." 1M ..Ji ~: :~: ¡ u! I t:i _.:_~L.~l~1._ -;-, ' i ~ '" .. a. __'-_"I. + N Õ , !'5i '''' ¡-.- 1 , '0..' ,¡ !....¡ E' Io:::! , g'. UI>.I 101='>' '" :~ '-1 0 ~ --+---- -~L;_r~1 1 ' I ' - ..;----+ 11---:~n::1r~r~rt1¡t1T~l:t1rmgm~1 òH"C i~1 :~I~,:2I~ :21 ' ~ ~I '""I Ni¡Q. 'ii' _ ,¡ "1 ' 1 , I 'I I', ;:::iUn~¡ ,~qXI~ S;;,~: ! 'I;;:;:;:; ;;:;, ~'.! Co!.;.""i 1.0'\:0-.:0-.0\110-.: 1. .~I0"¡ 10\;, i!ÑF~' \;;'~!;;!;!~,;;t;, I :;J;~! '~I "····'1'··--··· ,.,-. -. ',,,., _·-'-··_·;·~-'1-- (-··~1··~'--··-r·T-~i .!!I ' I: ' !~: ¡i Li ti 1ii¡iiti t_&;_l~I._,.L ¡ti; , : t::~: '13, b¡ 0: ¡Q:; i 't:::1:: o 0 .........; .. E œ i '" c o '" ~ E ~ Q 2.s .5 Qa; 1'- I- ,'É..ID i E! :it !g»2 ~~ " '1 ,,0 œ'1 ED. 0.'" OZ ø:E ~-g c ~ .?>o .~ q ~o E'1 E", 0" " ~ 'õ.2 " .. "a> :J LE D :; .= ,e..= œ ~ c:E o 'g þ1! U ~ ~ ;;;:; ,0 00 '" ;51 ~ ';,It:P :Oi)O <.i:Q.. '15 . IZ I.~ J_" -I I~> !j!- !;;ií .' I ei::c ¡ØI, IZH"E 1~1!-5 l~ijö2 r-~-it" ¡Mil iëH~ iCIII;,..e' i~I!'~' L~..:!Q., 1 ,-:I ,4;)' iE; J. 'Z: ,....Ii : ~i: t: 1~:iÆ II' i II 1 ! 11 , U 1_' :Ë>= iOl''ã3 zl'5- !....¡..E ;ª.J,~ '"",, 'bi ~ :<!~ -:~ .S;'!"';" i~'O :1:0\ ~, - '<j~ ·0 ~ i~16 .., ° " 0 0 8 8 0 0 ° Õ ... ... ... ... ... ... , . ° 0 0 ~ ~ ~ Ie! -, :¡; '" '" - õ :=1 ° ° M M M L~:! . . . e e e . . . P:;o:ö: B B:5 "-"-'" ~ ~-~¡~:~ to) V'V'V''I) ~ ~ ~!~I] 000:0-0 .c:..c::: .c'.c..c:: 0(,,) 0'0.0 i~ ~.~¡t:~ ,~:~¡~:~:,..$ i~¡~!::¡::::: 'Ñ N NÑi;:::¡ N'N,NL~j:'l . .,"-~, . I '·+-1 II I I ' "'1--,.- !I H , Eo e: Eo, Eo, Eo :818:8i8:8 ;'" ",."'if'"'''' I.~' ~¡~i~!~ , E'nUiï~ : 1\.1: ~¡ Vi vI ~ ,0;.0. 0;'0;1"- IJU!tJ aHt:c:¡:~!c:¡. l\.Iil\.I,vlViv :"5!¡:5!::-E¡:-5!I:5! E E E'EIE ~,~-æl~ic2¡ ··_-:^-··,,···-t,,·,r,--; M r--iO\! ;......¡r- 00 O-'·N,O\-"O¡..... ~ &r~j~,!;;ioo N'M M:M:..o¡g :;!:;; óio!:;! . , M " ~ :¡; " 00 ~ ... ~ ~ '" M 00 ~ " 00 ~ 00 ~ M, ::1; ° ... M i~ ~ " M M ¿ M ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ..,- 8!8 ~.., ...... ...... ~!~ -- ..0'..0 O'õ M M ,,, . " U!U t " ;¿::ö: 6 E '""- I 'I ¡v 1.51.5! I~ ! <OJ1 <OJ] ; ~ 1'~¡~1 !J~: U,u) ! ::E: ..o~."'I' : INi. 10'0. ' '0 0\'0$ i l......¡ -4-'9+~~_.t-.- !::¡. i i ! ! lUlU! I ; ¡ !~I\,J! , i ' I lð]XLU-1 '1 II I I - -'. I . , l;g;gi j i 0, I ' I r--'l~'¡ . '::J1::J'¡: ! ..c.."c I~H~ ~ IU U , . I 'IIH, ! ¡ : I , I l'tIEI! 1.1 .JJ.Þ I !c2Ic2 i .---t=:'~.¡ , i ' I I , Ir~T11~ ~[[J I~I~~I , '~I~ ~!I I 0\10-. O\I~ ~ ¡MIN ~ ~ ~ , ~:~ __"i'P'l2¡-__,__, , I 'Î i ltii¡ii ti¡~ ¡¡:, "---·f -r- -5-Bi . . . . CQ'OJ, o 01 u'1¡) .» '. ~ . -Q: t æ S:;1ë: ~i~¡ J.L'd¡¡¡¡ ~;~, 'r-.r-¡ '~';'I:.J ---'----+-i> . i , ~.~*._.L.,"'+" · I I I , . ! ¡ ¡ , ..L_+-_~_~ · : I · :p.,.! fill , .' I<OJ) -+-~- I I I cr:::icr:::' §Ü§' ;~ ]1 .0' ,,! , 1 i , I . I i . d¡lfil i t::i cd 'ft! ,1::!1::i !~I~I ¡~I ¡JIJi ¡ t! ti iiii i 6161 ICI)!CZI! ~ I!-¡!-¡ "'Wi-F', -~ -'¡-'f~"'I"'"'r '.."O·"01NI r-:, ¡......:.,\I")JM ~ ~'I'~ ~i :~I~¡~ :~ ~~, ~ i;:!;:~¡~ 'M r- r-! l~; ¡MIM¡OO ¡o 0IN! o! '0 o!~ +---.----1-.1 ."",; -~,. (..oi..oiNi i !~I~I~I I;!! !..oIMiO\I ' " !'""'!ir::!r::¡ ,0 ¡O'O,N: - - ;.----, ..-¡ 00 I..... 8, 18: ° '0 ~ i¡;;i 8 !8: ~ I~E~¡~ I~ õ]i ,o'ol~ ° ...... 0 'MIMi 0: M " !- . .~::::,.!:::::·r:.L L- , io-.'\O: !818! !olo, j~,~: 'NIM' :OIOi ......00100 loioì..... ioi~'~ ! , 00:\1"): .818 10iO, i~I~¡ )818j ,.....,\1"), !\õ\õ1 'ÕIÕIŠ: !~I~io' ,,~--;Jk:, ~; ~j~' .~ ¡¡I.. 0.. ä:¡ë:' t t't æ &,~; ",' . ,~: t>D._: :Jt: xi~' {J: (J:iCZl: :J";:J j;:J 1 CZI U)jCl), ~,~:~! 0-.'0-.10\; ~ ~;-~- ! .f-.¡--+ , ! 1 : . "H--,- I , , <OJ,(OJ;<OJ: .~.~~ ": ~~t~ ~ ]1]11 ::--?'~ I' , 1 ¡ i ; oj 01 01 :.5:.51·5! 313 3i (OJ'CI:I¡CI:I¡ u~;~~ ;;:~I,ª'I~ '::1;" M,-' o °101......: _.~---'t--. - !~ ......¡Mir-i I~ ~¡.~lls,.: :$ ~!~ ~1 '0 cilo''- +_.._q_J N:~¡r-! gig!sl &::~'181 .-'...... NI 0:0 O¡ ~,~ ~I I::;;;\Õ!~ '<5'<51<5 Š <"),<")......' 0 - .7"_;:-..::::..J::--- '-' N Õ ... " 0> ~ 0. Œ [0 rq --,,,----. ¡,n R..' :-.. ì 1 .---{"~ ,-, I', J n " . . .- ,,- I; I:,.., rJAN. 8,;.. MBTB, Inc. c, Land Use " " " '" " w w " <J " " ~ (/) Banyan Street " " ff " U " C " " 'E I i i I ) E- o San Carlos Drive 0 " " " " " I' " Z " " U 8 . " Miromor " '" ff " "- ~ . 8 8 r " 7 , , , s " s <; .0 , U '¡: , 0 (/) c , " J 0 " '" "- <; Z " z I 'j]ã"V--- 0 I I /J I 12 « " I I "I' 18 17 I, J _..1 I a " <J '" " :> c w > '" "- 1 Miromor " " " " Sonta Barbaro Dr .... , " 0 . i tZ " Z " 0 " c . 0 U 8 '" .S 7 .c '" c ,~ :> (/) ~OM ,.-...., ," '. , ' . ", ---- - ff \ E 0 " 0 0.. . ,I Z J I, 0 " " '" I À U I I 0 0 to 50 Ü 22 I" to I" 0:: " " zz .. I ZJ " /12 J I... ----- '.J_-+_L Z< .. I I 130160100880002 Higley, James W 7301 James Rd Fort Pierce, FL 34951-2130 CU 00-010 []]]]]]] ~ ~..~..~ /-1../ Community Development f Geographic Informatiõn Systems Map revised November 28 .2000 This pattern indicates subject parcel 1No~__~1<>c_..~_-.o.~~ --r~NI__II>P'O"'cIo"""""<UtOnI_""""'"_ N ...._ion_..............rcIed"".......'-I¡aIvÞO""'<l~ '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY 'WI CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM _.. "'ì , \ 11 Section 11 ,07.01 (C) of the St. t.ucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall nol be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of ihe Board of Couniy Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes the Following Conditional Use: To allow the construction of a 3,192 square foot convenience store with 5 gasoline pumps serving 10 vehicle stations and an automatic car wash, to be known as Hess Station - Turnpike Feeder Road. Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: Northeast corner of the intersection of Miramar A venue and Turnpike Feeder Road CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: January 8. 2001 Q AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL u§.V I^I ¡:: A-0012- I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): J^\ ; \ t "C\ M M 0 f'c.. LL s. £ q "j g IJ (A.) T h t d c.. L t:J.A/'t PSL· F,,",3'-{Qg3 Address: Date: {- S -0-0 Signed: ~?P' / -- -- Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: (FILE NUMBER CU-OO-010 MBTB, INC.) .' ....... ST. LUCIE COUNTY ...., CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07,01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet ofthe property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes the Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: Please Return To: To allow the construction of a 3,192 square foot convenience store with 5 gasoline pumps serving 10 vehicle stations and an automatic car wash, to be known as Hess Station· Turnpike Feeder Road. Northeast corner of the intersection of Miramar Avenue and Turnpike Feeder Road CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) SI. Lucie County, Department of Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue, FI. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: January :7 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Address: Date: E 41;1/;;; ¡J,¿ø/J/l'1/} cJ;Z;2/ ~..-tv (þ"f £-v- I'Ll / . (77 JIj of) 4/.~ , Signed: ,'51 if Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: (FILE NUMBER CU-00-010 MBTB, INC. ) ~ ..... S:f: -...I ITEM NO. AGENDA REOUEST DATE: 01/09/01 CONSENT REGULAR PUBLIC Leg. [ ] HEARING [ X Quasi-JD [ X ] Communitv DeveloDment PRESENTED BY: 'ic. dluc£JL. TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: X APPROVED OTHER: County kttorney: (k Originating Department' Finance, lCheck for Copy only, if applic;;.bleJ Community Dev. Dir. Consider Draft Resolution 01-004 approving the request of the Ft. Pierce Air Center for a Major Adjustment to the Existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport for Property Located at 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport. The Ft. pierce Air Center has submitted an application for a Major Adjustment to the Existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport for the project known as Ft. Pierce Air Center to allow for the construction of 13,000 square feet of hangar space (Hangar E- 19) and 1,820 square feet of office space to an existing hangar (Hangar E-7) for a total of 14,820 square feet of space for property located at 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport. N/A On September 2, 1997, this Board approved a major adjustment to the St. Lucie County International Airport for an additional 12,250 square feet of space to the Ft. Pierce Air Center. On February 17, 1998, this Board approved the addition of 13,000 square feet of space consisting of 12,000 square feet of hangar space and 1,000 square feet of office space to the Ft. pierce Air Center. On January 19, 1999, this Board approved the addition of 3,360 square feet of office space. On May 4, 1999, this Board approved the addition of 4,800 square feet of hangar space. On August 17, 1999, this Board approved the addition of 13,000 square feet of hangar space. On February 1, 2000, this Board approved the addition of 15,800 square feet of hangar space and 800 square feet of storage space. On October 17, 2000, this Board approved the addition of 28,000 square feet of hangar space. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 01-004 authorizing a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. DENIED as M. Anderson y Administrator Review and Approvals Management & Budget: Purchasing, Other, Other, '-' '-' COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: January 9,2001 Resolution 01 -004 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: January 3,2000 Subject: Consider Draft Resolution 0 I -004 approving the request of The FI. Pierce Air Center for a Major Adjustment to the Existing Conditional Use at the SI. Lucie County International Airport for Property Located at 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, SI. Lucie County International Airport. The FI. Pierce Air Center has applied for a major adjustment to the existing SI. Lucie County International Airport Conditional Use to allow for the addition of 13,000 square feet of hangar space (Hangar E-19) and an additional 1,830 square feet of office space to an existing hangar (E-7) for property located at 2982 Curtis King Boulevard. Staff has reviewed the request for a major adjustment to an existing conditional use and has determined that it is consistent with the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Airport Master Plan. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 01-004, which, if approved, would grant this request for a Major Adjustment to the SI. Lucie County International Airport Existing Conditional Use. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 01-004. SUBMITTED: ~££L- I. Shewchuk, AlCP mmunity Development Director cc: Paul Phi1Jips R. EtTo1 Houck Emesto Velasco, P .E. File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 '-' 'wi RESOLUTION 01-004 FILE NO.: BCC-01-o01 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A MAJOR ADJUSTMENT TO THE EXISTING ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONDITIONAL USE FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE FT. PIERCE AIR CENTER - HANGAR E-19 AND E-7 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Pursuant to Section 3.3.122(7) of the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, effective July 1, 1984, and Section 3.01.03(W)(7)(a) of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code, effective August 1, 1990, the St. Lucie County International Airport is considered to be an existing Conditional Use. 2. The FI. Pierce Air Center has been operating as a Fixed Base Operations Center (FBO) on a 21.0 acre leased parcel since 1987. This FBO is located on the western side of the existing airport grounds. The Ft. Pierce Air Center has applied for a major adjustment to their existing conditional use permit to allow the construction of an additional 13,000 square fee of hangar space (Hangar E-19) and 1,830 square feet of office space to an existing hangar (E-7) for a total of 14,830 square feet of space. 3. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the proposed Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use and found it to be in substantial conformity with the overall Airport Master Plan. 4. On January 9, 2001, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 5. The proposed Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the SI. Lucié County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. File No.: BCC-01-001 January 9, 2001 Resolution 01-004 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 '-' ....,¡ 6. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare, 7, The proposed project will be serviced by adequate public facilities and services. 8. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on January 9, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.05(E), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Major Adjustment to the Existing St. Lucie County International Airport Conditional Use, is hereby approved for the property described as follows: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST RUN SOUTH 89°31'34" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE, RUN NORTH 00°26'26" EAST 625.11 FEET PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO A POINT; THENCE, RUN SOUTH 87°51 '34" EAST 36.09 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, RUN SOUTH 87°51'34" EAST 668.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE, RUN NORTH 45°15'26" EAST 515.68 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE, RUN NORTH 44°42'34" WEST 1314.92 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 30°04'00" AND A RADIUS OF 1,294.52 FEET; THENCE, RUN IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 678.55 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT OF SAID CURVE; THENCE, RUN SOUTH 45°17'26" WEST 100 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE, RUN SOUTH 00°22'26" WEST 540.00 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Tax \.D. No. 1429-323-0002-000/6). (Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard. St. Lucie County International Airport.) B. The approval granted under this Major Adjustment to an Existing_Conditional Use approval shall expire on January 9, 2002, unless a building permit is issued or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code_ File No.: BCC-01-001 January g. 2001 Resolution 01-004 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 "- >oJ C. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on January 9, 2001, shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use approval. Should the Conditional Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07,05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. D. The Conditional Use Permit approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Ft. Pierce Air Center, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to; the Federal Aviation Administration, St. Lucie County International Airport, United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. E. The conditions set forth in Part A are an integral non-severable part of the site plan approval granted by this resolution. In any condition set forth in Part A is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted by this resolution shall become null and void. F. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson xxx Vice-Chairman Doug Coward xxx Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx File No.: BCC-01-001 January g. 2001 Resolution 01-004 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 '-' 'wi PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 9th Day of January 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hI H: IWPIRESOLUTI.NIFI NISH ED.OOIFP AIRB.CUIFPAIR8,RES File No.: BCC-01-001 January 9, 2001 Resolution 01-004 Page 4 '-' ...., ____ z "- Q) +-' C ,.- Q)O) 0 Oí 0 "- W I <t: ,.- "- a C\J Q) 0) 0 ü c "- C\J 0 Q) m ·-I 0... +-' LL i' < . < ~ Ë c ~ g .. . [~ g ~ " . 0 :;:; " Ë ~" .:::~ " " ,- s 0 e:ë o "- u . " ~ o . " · · i o ] ì · ¡ c . c ¡ \ . , , . c ~ · o o \ C , § · I · · w ~ ~ '" ç z ::> 0 U n: w > ¡¡: w ~ ~ '" z <{ 0 :?; ~ ~ '" a.oy_s Q'QI]!)OI~! . . ,,~ ",..." ~]O':Ji I: ~ ; -, , .' ~ I: · 0'0II033H$ ~l·' 'm, -',:s:...._~- '-"-~--JÑñ~7.íÑ';¡¡--~ ç z ::> o ü " -.,.-.---. " , ''''. ~---, r'~-õ,O;;-- /fOJ1!In ",,- J " ", , , '" , " w z ¡::: n: <{ ::;; -~:iÑO~~ ~ ~ '" "- '--'-"-'---... w , ¡i?:-.J l't'NYJ ~ ~ · · r..---/ -(. .,.,. /~<I;-fl~~' /r-" ¡ w \\O~...../ ,/ ~ ~ '" '" s " s S< ( //) S 9[ 1 ///"\ / // AlNn08 3380H833>10 , ~ '-' A petition of Ft. Pierce Air Center - Hangars E-19 for a major adjustment to an existing conditional use. / / / / / / / / "' :;:; ~ :J U F. P. F. D. D. Canal No. 26 Sl. Lucie Boulevard " o o <r ~ ~ o "' BCC 01-001 V / / / / / /J This pattern indictates ~ subject parcel Community Development ~ Geographic Information Systems Map revised December 20. 2000 Thilmap"'_<><>mpIIedIorQO<\8<"~W'd"""""~""" _~_hubNn ..-1O¡:W_.... .............._~. inIofmoIion~.~ionDIinløndodlÐr......~lIird1gdocu'no<C. N Zoning "'" Ft. Pierce Air Center - Hangar E-19 u / / / / / / / / -0 ~ 0 > '" :; 0 m '" ,<:; ><: IL ~ ~ :J U F.P.F.D.D. Canal No. 26 IL SI. Lucie CG g 0: Boulevard IL ~ ~ a "' BCG 01-001 V / / / / / /1 This pattern indictates ~ subject parcel Community Development t Geographic Inlormation Systems Map revised December 20, 2000 Thiomap _ ÞMn co<rQiIðd Ior_.paming ond ,-..:. po.<po!IIISMIy _-rollo1.....bHn~topr<Mdølr.o...,!IIOoIII....ondlOCC\Dlll N """""'1"",pooa_._iorol<-1d<ldloruH...loogoIltl>ir><Þngdoc:o.menl· "'" ...., ~~~i':i::--~£'~ .... .... .... .... -3; "'IJ '(I ,(..1.(.,1 '" N ~:~ ~,~:::: C:a,::t ~,~ ~!~~ 6 ~ ~,~ '..J.e,.¡ (.,1;(..1,(..1 - 0,0 0'0 0:0,0 0 ~ 0:00'00:0,00 0·00 0 0,0:0'0 (..I.N ~'~ O:N~;~ g,g 8:8 8_8 gig 000·00'0010 0(.1 0> 0 (..>.m (.I ¡CD s: ~.~ ~ ~;a: ~'i!0~ "2 C -,r- r ,'1\:1 n ""C.r,,;ø o ~'C C C ..... "(ij" <:: C a :><" n 9. 9. !:!.~:;;.... 9.!::!. I' o () (I (I '< _. ~ (II CII _ ~~~ ~:!]Ò>~ ¡:~c ro~.cc ~~ ~ ~.õ ~:~ \10 CD(/) 1f 9.~ ~ -~. ,,- o m m'" r Z . " ~ · e.ffi 3 . . 0 õ "- .. 0 -,,< ~. "õ ii" g ¡¡" ».0 -.'¡: "'co o . , ~ ~ ~'£? ~,o::;- o ':::T.n (i'~:ifï OQl·O o """0 § ~:§ R::!!-~ ,,- o """ ;:. § 5- ¡:¡ïm or o 0 c c :J'O ..:;t'" m , it .a ,. · · · ,.;JT,:,;,¡';s:;UN,N "t)d;:U¡N':r.; ;&;0. ~-ß¡~:~~gO_~I~i~ ~ ~1~1~:~$~~:~i~¡$ â -. :ü3 ,x ca (.,I'Xå3 'ca Co'> ~~I~-S(.,l o¡- S!S g£?¡¡'~ ~.:~ ~:~ ~:~ ~r'~ ~:> ~,~ ~5.'(I eII'~ (D (I . '" " ~ ~~-~'~~'~~~'~li'Q æ-~ ~!=6~ a ~ ~'~i~~ n~¡¡¡' ãï ii' g. ãïiÞ" ñj"ã) (I~'!g'@ ~ t ~ g@-g ~ g o "'"""",, ,,;;;¡ ~-"'Tl \/J rrr.rrr-r:rr-'g: · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ t:': 'f ~ ¡g'~ ~ ~ 'f,~ ~ ~';I OI(.I~b~&¿:b~~Q mQ01UJOocncnQ. ú>:o ú> J\J ú> 0 ú> ú> ~ '''La J\J CXI 0·0 IV IV z · 3 · ... i<:'" !. .g == to) . :< ~g !a.' ~ ~o o ~ ;g "'3 "'3 OC - . gq :-'''' "'~ o . ;¡'Õ .,,-0 rij' g ~ ~ ~~ ~ . Q~ C ~ ;;-0 ~ .. ~ ;;" . ;; cÆ ~ ~ 3 _t¡"1 ~ õ' "'c '" ';, . 3 ~ '-' ST. t&i'E' COÙNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA JANUARY' 9,20{}1 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, NonCE is hereby given In accordance with Section 1 1.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, thai Ihe following applicants hove requested that the St, Lucie County Boord of County Commissioners consider their reque~t as follows: , 1. MBTB, Inc. Mr. Som Brink, for 0 Condltionol Use Permit 10 ollow the construction of 3,192 square fool conve- nience store with gasoline Facility and automatic car wash for the following described property: Lots 1 through 5, Bloà 178, of Lakewood Pork Unit 12A, According to the plat thereof, os recorded In,plat book 11 at Page 37 of Public Records of St. llJ(:Ie County, Fl (Tax Id No. 1301_615_0200_0007 1301-615-0198-0009 1301_615_0197_0002) location: East side of Turnpike Feeder Road, the northeast comet of Mif"amar Avenue and Turnpike Feeder Road 2. The Fort Pierce Air Center ha$ applied for a Molor Adjustment to melr existing Conditional Use oporgtions at the St. Lucie County International AirP;Qrt.. followIng described property: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of SEC- TION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SouTH, RANGE 40 EAST RUN SOUTH 89°31'34" EAST 30.00 fEETTQ. A POINT L.YING Oi'.t"THe:-SOiJTH LINE. OF SAID SECTION: THENCE RUN NORTH OO026'26~ EAST 625.11 fEET PARALLEL fEET TO THE WEST LINE Of SAID SECTION TO A POINT: THENCE ·RUN· SouTH 87<>5,'34" 'EAST 36.09 fEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH 87°51'3.4" EAST 36.09 fEET TO "A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE. POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT BEGINNING RuN SOUTH 87°51'3.4" EAST 668.83 FEET; TO' A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH .45°1 :;26" EAST 515.6à'FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH .44°42'34" WEST 1314.92 FEET TO A POINT. SAID POINT BEING THE PC Of A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 30°04'00" AND A ,RADIUS OF 1294.52 fEET; THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHERLYOIREC- TlON ALONG THE ARC Of SAID CURVE 678.55 fEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SqUTH 4S<>17'26" WEST 1 00 fEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°22'26" WEST 5.40.00 FEET TO A POINT ; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. All LYING IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP. 34 SOUTH, RANGE40 ~AST. (Port of Tax 1.0. No. 1430_131_0001.oOO/4 (LocatIon: St. Lucie County Int~tional AIrport; Hangar , <) ~BUNE -...I 3. JEffREY AND TARA TOBIN, for 0 dan A Mobile I ,Home to be perml"ed on 29.99 acres of land located in . >he AG-5 tAg",,"u'al . 1 du/5 acre,)'a' >he fallowing ; described property: ' , . A PARCEL OF lAND BEGINNING fROM THE NORTH- WEST CORNER OF THE SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37, SOUTH, RANGE 37 EAST, ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA, RUN 89°.47"40" E ALONG THE SECTION LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 3317.1 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST~ ERLY LINE OF EVANS PROPERTIES, INC., FOR THE P.O.B, THENCE RUN S 30°44'17" E ALONG EVANS PROPERTIES, INC. PROPERTY LINE A DISTANCE OF 511.6 FEET, THENCE RUN S. 59°05'54" W A DISTANCE OF 1436,53 fEET TO THE' EAST LINE OF BLUEFIELD ROAD; THENCE RUN N 35°36'50" W ALONG BLUE- fielD ROAD A DISTANCE OF 890.62 fEET; THENCE RUN N 59°05'54" E A DISTANCE Of 1506.79 feET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF EVANS PROPERTIES INC., THENCE RUN S .30°44'17" E ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LNE Of EVANS PROPERTIES INe. A 'DISTANCE OF. 373,36 FEET TO THE P.O.8 LYING IN , AND COMPRISING A PART OF SECTIONS 10 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH RANGE 37 EAST IN Sf LUCIE COUNTY Tax. Id. 4110-433-0020-0016 location: 10280 Bluefiekl RoOd PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commis- sion Chambers~ Jrd floor of the Roger Poitras Adminlstra- tiOf! Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce.. Florida on Jonuory 9, 2001. beginning at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible.' ' PURSUANT TO Section· 286.0105"florlda Statutes, If a penon decides to appeal any decision made by 0 board, agency, or commission with respect to'any matter consid- ered at a meeting Of" hearing, h. will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a've..batim record of the proceedings Is made, which record Indudes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LuCIE COuNTY, flORIOA_ 151 FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, CHAIRMAN Publish: December 29, 2000 2049.477 IZ-ZC}·DO \...- AGENDA REQUEST '-ÍTEM No.5, r '-' DATE: 01/09/01 CONSENT [ REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. [] Quasi-Jud. [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Communi tv DeveloDment PRESENTED BY: J7k&£L Development Director SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning of Property located at 5905 Oleander Avenue, on the west side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 100 feet south of Ulrich Road from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District - Draft Resolution 01-003, This petition has been amended by the applicant to request the RF (Religious facilities) Zoning District rather than the advertised I (Institutional) Zoning District. BACKGROUND: petition of Miami Latin Church of God for a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District for 5.68 acres of land. The proposed rezoning is to allow the applicant to establish a church facility on the subject property. (File No. RZ-OO-014) FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 4 to 3, with one member (Mr. Lounds) abstaining, and one member (Mr. Moore) absent, recommended approval of the subject property from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District at its November 16, 2000, meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft Resolution 01-003 changing the zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District for property located at 5905 Oleander Avenue, on the west side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 100 feet south of Ulrich Road. [X [ APPROVED DENIED OTHER: Continue to January 23, 2000 Give applicant time to meet withDO s~f to work out details. 1 s M. Anderson un y Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: V~~ Review and Approvals Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Department: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) '-' ...., COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: January 9, 2001 Resolution 01-003 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: January 3, 2001 Subject: Petition of Miami Latin Church of God, for a Change in Zoning from the AR- I (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District). (File No.: RZ-OO-014) The proposed rezoning of property located at 5905 Oleander Avenue, on the west side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 100 feet south of Ulrich Road is to allow for the establishment of a church facility. Prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission, staff conferred with the applicant who agreed to amend the application to request a change in zoning to the RF Zoning District instead of the Institutional Zoning District. Because RF Zoning is considered to be a subset of Institutional Zoning, are-advertisement of the revised request is not necessary. Although the Institutional Zoning District allows for the establishment of churches, it also allows other uses which may not be appropriate for the area of the proposed rezoning. The RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District was specifically provided in the Land Development Code in order to address the establishment of churches without allowing the additional permitted and conditional uses in the Institutional Zoning District. At the November 16, 2000, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 4 to 3, with one member (Mr. Lounds) abstaining, and one member (Mr. Moore) absent, recommended approval for the change in zoning to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District. This proposed rezoning meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies ofthe St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. . Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 01-003, which, if approved, would grant a change in zoning from the AR-I (Agricultural, Residential- I du/acre) Zoning District to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District. '- ...., November 29,2000 Page 2 Subject: Miami Latin Church of God RZ-OO-O I 4 Staff recommends the approval of this petition as set forth in Draft Resolution 01-003. SUBMITTED: ~ cfLcivL lia I. Shewchuk, AICP ommunity Development Director hf cc: Reverend Eduardo Ureña Linda Kymalainen Richard D. Robinson File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 '-' ...., RESOLUTION 01-003 FILE NO.: RZ-oO-o14 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Miami Latin Church of God. presented a petition for a change in zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the property described below. Prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, the petitioner amended his application to request a change in zoning to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District. 2. On November 16, 2000, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 15 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve a change in zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District for the property described in Part A below. 3. On January 9, 2001, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 15 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed change in zoning has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of property in the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: File No.: RZ-00-014 January 9, 2001 Resolution 01-003 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '-' ...., A. The proposed change in the Zoning District Classification from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District for that property described as follows: THE EAST 'Iz OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: BEGIN IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 220; THENCE RUN NORTH 63 FEET; THENCE RUN EASTERLY TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 220, WHICH IS 52 FEET NORTH OF SAID LOT'S SOUTHEAST CORNER; THENCE RUN SOUTH TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE RUN WEST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 220, TO A POINT OF BEGINNING; LESS THE EAST 33 FEET FOR ROAD. SAME BEING THE SUBDIVISION OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, AND THE NORTH '12 OF THE SOUTH 'Iz OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 114, LESS THE EAST 33 FEET FOR ROAD PURPOSES, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. (TAX ID. #: 3409-143-0001-00011) (Location: 5905 Oleander Avenue. West side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 100 feet south of Ulrich Road.) owned by Richard D. Robinson, is hereby approved. B. The 51. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of 51. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson xxx Vice-Chairman Doug Coward xxx Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx File No.: RZ-00-014 January g. 2001 Resolution 01-003 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 '-' ...", PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 9th Day of January 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY ATTEST: Deputy Clerk hI H:\WP\RESOLUTI.NIFINISHED,OOlMiamiRZIMiamiRES.wpd File No.: RZ-00-014 January 9. 2001 Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney Resolution 01-003 Page 3 · " ..... ...., AGENDA ITEM 2: FILE NO. RZ-OO-014 MIAMI LATIN CHURCH OF GOD Mr. Flores introduced the item as a petition for rezoning from the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential - I dulacre) Zoning District to I (Institutional) Zoning District on property located at 5905 Oleander Avenue. The purpose of the rezoning is to a!!ow the applicant to establish a church facility on the subject property. The surrounding zoning to the north, south, and west of this subject property is AR-l. There is RS-3 and RS-2 zoning to the east and Institutional Zoning located further to the north east. Although the Institutional Zoning District aTlows for the establishment of churches it also aTlows for other uses that might not be appropriate for the area of the proposed zoning. The RF (Religious Facility) Zoning District was specifically provided in the Land Development Code in order to address the establishment of churches without aTlowing the additional permitted and conditional uses in the area. Chairman Matthes asked if there were any questions of staff. There being none he asked the applicant to come forward. Reverend Ureña stated he was with the Miami Latin Church of God. He would like to comment on comments made by staff. Originally the application was submitted to have a zoning change from AR- I to Institutional. He agreed with what staff has recommended with RF Zoning instead. He stated that what staff has suggested is what is really needed and that is all the church wants the board to approve. Chairman Matthes asked if this is an official request of change or is there paperwork that needs to be done. Mr. Kelly replied that the districts were reviewed and the RF Zoning is entirely contained within the Institutional Zoning. There is nothing outside of it. It is truly a subset, so the request to drop from the broadest to the narrowest defined district reaTly includes the same things that were already advertised. He stated that should the board approve it then to state in the motion it is the RF Zoning District. Chairman Matthes asked if there were any questions of the petitioner. There being none, he stated for the petitioner to stand by if there were questions from the public. , .' November 16. 2000 page 6 ," . ....... "-" Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing, stating if anyone would like to come .' forward to speak for or against the petition. Ms, Turner from 8 [ South River Road in Stuart, Florida appeared before the board. She has a Real Estate License and is here to represent Mr. and Mrs. Balanzategui of 5803 Oleander A venue and partiall y Ms. Mitchell of 5804 Oleander A venue, The Balanzategui family has owned this property for 44 years and it is the adjoining property to the north of the petitioner. The Mitchell family lives across the street and has been living there for 33 years. The application for this rezoning was made on September 20,2000. Unfortunately she would like to back up a little bit and take a look at the methodology in which this notice was made to the other parties concerned. Because of certain circumstances Ms. Mitchell had to call Mr. Balanzategui, because he was not recei ving his mail for some reason. She stated that if the application was made on September 20th and 24 people were notified by mail and yet no one that she has contacted has been aware of a notice. These residents have invested 33 to 44 years in their property and community and to come to them with a request for rezoning to be taken so liberally and kind of unfairly. The way this notice was sent out should be protested in her opinion. She stated no one received a list of other parties that were notified and no one had to sign for the notice. There is no one else attending this meeting that was notified. Mr. Balanzategui would not have known had it not been for Ms. Mitchell calling him about it, because of a problem with his mail. She did not have time to prepare any material for this meeting because the invalid notice is reason enough to go back and start over. Chairman Matthes asked to inteIject to ask Mr. Kelly what the notification process is and was it followed properly. Mr. Kelly stated that the notice procedure is 3-foId. There is a mailed notice sent to each person with property within 500 feet of the boundary in question. There is a sign placed on the property and an ad in the paper ran 10 days ahead of the meeting. The letters are mailed on the same day the ads run in the paper. Chairman Matthes asked to confirm that all legal requirements were met on this application. Mr. Kelly replied in the affirmative. Ms, Turner stated that people who have lived in that area for 33 to 44 years did not see a sign anywhere, She asked why residents did not receive letters, and why the residents that received a letter did not get a list of other residents with in 500 feet. Chairman Matthes stated that according to the representation that was just given, the required legal procedure was followed for this notification. He suggested to Ms. Turner to let the board know the opinion of the application and why, and to move on from the notification procedure. " November 16.2000 page 7 .. ....... >.,J Ms. Turner stated that she wants to make it very clear that Mr. Balanzategui has owned the 17 adjoining acres for 44 years and he did not receive a letter. He was contacted by Ms. Mitchell 2 days ago by phone. These residents that she represents are opposed to this application and because of no appropriate notice given, Chairman Matthes asked if they were opposed to the requested change or because of bad notification, Ms. Turner stated that Mr. Balanzategui has a great possibility of having a historic home there and contemplating in the preliminary stages of different type of development for this neighborhood, which could enhance the area even more than this proposed church. Mr. Grande stated that he does not see Mr. Balanzategui on the list to be notified, he sees Ms. BaJanzategui though. Ms. Turner explained that she is 87 years old and is his mother. He has lived there with her for last 44 years. The fact remains that neither one of them received a letter. She stated that there is proof at the Post Office because of his particular circumstance the mail was held by request. Ms. Mitchell called them out of good faith and good will with concern of this issue. Chairman Mattes asked if the mailing address 5803 Oleander Avenue accurate for this family. Ms, Turner replied in the affirmative. Mr. Balanzategui stated that his mother was too elderly to come to the meeting herself. He stated he has lived at the address for 44 years. He is opposed to a church being on that property. He stated no one has any idea what is going to be put there. He stated that without a thorough understanding of what is going to be there he cannot approve of it. Especially when this area is being looked at to be nice residential area in the future. Chairman Matthes stated that the request has been changed from the Institutional Zoning which is a very broad category to the Religious Facility Zoning which is more closely defined just for religious facilities. He explained that some of the element of the unknown has been removed by the change of request. Other than that this is a rezoning and there can not be limits or conditions on a rezoning map. Mr, Balanzategui asked if this was a yes or no matter. Chairman Matthes stated that the board will make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners as to whether to recommend approval or denial of the application. He explained to Mr, Balanzategui that he has the right to speak to this board and the Board of County Commissioners and share his thoughts and concerns on the application. .' November 16. 2000 - page 8 .' ..... ...., Mr. Balanzategui stated that some of his concerns with were what the church schedule would be and the noise levels. He has no idea what the actual structure will look like, Chairman Matthes stated that at this point in the process the zoning for the land is the only thing in question. He does not see a problem with the applicant answering any questions the residents might have at this time. Mr. BaIanzategui asked how many churches of this denomination are there in existence. Chairman Matthes asked if that answered the questions of the concerned residents. Mr. Balanzategui replied that some were answered but he would still like to know what the structure is going to consist of. Chairman Matthes stated if the applicant can answer that question that is fine. He would like to remind everyone that this is just a hearing on a zoning change. Reverened Ureña replied that the structure would like to build a physical church building. The only thing that will be done there are church services 2 or 3 times a week from about 7:30 to 9:00. Chairman Matthes asked what size of a building was anticipated being built. Reverened Ureña replied that currently it is a small group and the building would be for about 150 to 200 people. Chairman Matthes asked how big the actual building would be for that size congregation. Reverend Ureña stated less than 3,000 feet. Chairman Matthes asked if Mr. Balanzategui had any more questions at this time. Mr. BaIanzategui stated he is stilI opposed to the application. Ms. Túrner asked if she could approach the podium again. Chairman Matthes stated that typically the public is only allowed to speak once per hearing. But he will allow it this time. " November 16. 2000 page 9 '-' 'wi Ms, Turner stated that the discussion at hand is 44 years of the area residents' investments. She would like to bring up again that there was not appropriate notification to the property owners surrounding the property in question. She stated that if this church fails. this board has allowed approximately 200 people in to this residential area. She would like to know why this board is so quick to change zoning. Her question is why this board is so quick to make a judgement like this in a beautiful residential area. That will lower property value. Chainnan Matthes reiterated that no decision has been made at this point in the hearing. At this moment of the hearing the board is looking for facts to base their decision on. He stated that a petition has come forward that has met the requirements and rules, so therefore' it is being heard. Ms. Turner asked what wi!! happen if the church fails. Chainnan Matthes replied that her concern is not a consideration of a rezoning application application. He explained that this board must stick to the confines of what is suppose to be discussed. Ms. Turner stated that this application has questionable security, obtrusive lighting, unforeseen schedules, and other things that are going to effect the property owners that have lived there for 44 years. This just seems unreal in her opinion that these residents are not given proper notice and not gi ven proper consideration. Chainnan Matthes thanked Ms. Turner for her time. He stated that staff has instructed that proper notice was given. He stated the board has noted her comments and asked if any board members had any direct questions for Ms. Turner. Mr, Merritt asked if the RF zoning would allow church schools. Mr. Flores replied that educational services would be a conditional use under the RF zoning. Thus meaning it would need a separate hearing. Chainnan Matthes stated that the public hearing is sti!! in process. He also reiterated that this board does not have final decision empowennent, this board is an advisory board only. Mr. Grande stated that telling the concerned residents that a rezoning for this property does not mean that anything can be built on the property. The applicant will have to meet and confonn to the site plan requirements of St. Lucie County. The County wi!! definitely support and protect the area under those circumstances. Chainnan Matthes asked if any facility would require a site plan approval. Mr. Kelly replied that any facility under 6,000 square feet would not require the fonnal site plan process. However, as it goes to the Building Permitting office the same kinds of reviewing is taken place on the site plan. November 16.2000 page L 0 '-' ...., Mr. Grande asked if everything is still looked at in that process as compared to the fonnal process, Mr_ Kelly replied that landscaping, signage, lighting, parking spaces, set backs, etc. will still be reviewed. Chainnan Matthes stated if anybody in the public would like to speak to come forward at this time. Ms. Turner stated she would like to speak again. Chainnan Matthes replied that this is not really nonnal procedure to allow her to speak again but would allow it one last time, Ms. Turner stated she was in the Property Appraiser's office yesterday she spoke with a gentleman who told her that Institutional Zoning was any building less than 6,000 square feet. She stated that the application proposes a building 5,000 feet and now this board is going to grant RF instead of Institutional. Chainnan Matthes explained that this board has not taken any action. He stated that the applicant has requested the proposed zoning be RF instead of the Institutional. Ms. Turner stated that either way this is a real fine line. She stated that this entire procedure is not right that property owners were not given proper notice. Chainnan Matthes thanked Ms. Turner. The Public Hearing was closed. Mr. Flores stated staff has reviewed this petition and has detennined that it generally confonns with the standards of review as set forth in Land Development Code and does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends this petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval to the RF zoning district because RF zoning is more appropriate for than area and would allow the applicant to-accomplish its stated goals while better protecting the area than the Institutional Zoning. Mr. Hearn asked how the landscaping along the road perimeter across the street from residential zoning will be treated, Mr. Kelly replied that the areas which are between a vehicular use area will require the typical hedge and one tree every thirty feet. He stated areas that are screened by the building the requirements are some what less, but they are still looked to landscape those areas while reviewing the plans. November 16, 2000 page L L .. '-' -...I Mr. Menitt stated he is against this petition, because it is opening the doors for educational facilities, He stated that has been residential area since the 1900's. In good faith he can not change the zoning, He does not have a problem with the church, but his problem is opening the door to educational facilities in that area, Chairman Matthes reiterated that educational facilities would need another hearing for a conditional use, Mr. Kelly replied in the affirmative and explained that the RF zoning only allows churches, synagogues, temples and similar uses, which is the actual structure for the worship. Any other use including educational and daycare would have to come back to this board for a conditional use, Mr. Hearn stated that along the lines of what Mr. Menitt is refening to, he knows that an accessory use, playground or athletic fields, which would not require any further hearings for that to take place in that area. He has some concern about that also. Mr_ Grande asked if accessory uses would require existing similar uses to be allowed without approval. Mr. Kelly replied anything in the accessory use which is parking lots, playground, and closed storage structure that are likely. These cannot be there without the primary structure being there first. If the church structure were constructed than any of the accessory uses can be put in without additional permitting. Chairman Matthes asked for a motion. Mr. Grande stated after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as setforth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County lAnd Development Code, 1 hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Miami lAtin Church of God, for a change in zoning from the AR-l (Agriculture, Residential-Idu/acre) Zoning District to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District, because it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.-Mr. Trias seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote the motion passed 4-3, with Mr. Merritt, Mr. McCurdy, Mr. Jones voted against it. Mr. Lounds abstained due to being tardy to the meeting and missing the majority of the presentation of the petition. Mr. Kelly stated that since the notification was questioned he would like to make the announcement that this petition will go before the Board of County Commission on December 5, 2000. He explained there will be one more letter sent out also. The Board of County Commission' will make the final decision, November 16.2000 page 12 · . , .' '-' -...I Chainnan Matthes reiterated that the Planning and Zoning Board is just an advisory board. Mr. Grande asked if there is anyway to have the staff check to make sure the sign is present on the property. Mr. Kelly replied it will be checked. A Petition of Miami Latin Church of God for a Change in Zoning AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 uniVacre) to I (Institutional). o JCCD Mallard Court '-' I " " " " '" ----------------- D " ., " ./ " .1 Ii I' " /. .......r ----------------- ~ 1.1 1 /2 I ,J L /2 I -=-...., ru-r--If-' rï4- ,-1 --1 ~---t----1 ~--.J----1 IS 10 IS 1 10 --I "'--k--~ "'--1<--1 .J L_"--J.~~.J 1_~Îll.!...J I J rr I ' I I TT . I -- ------- ---I---¡ -~ ~-~~-~~ ~-~~-~I I I ¡ I I I I I ,T, 'ì I 1'1 15\ 4¡J\ZI' 15141J121'1 I- ....1-_1_./......-1. J I LJ.. I ._,--- I ¡--¡-iT I I, I I I I I I !514IJI2!1 I 5\4IJ\z!,¡ I I ¡Ii I : : I : I . , ~ < . ~--------------- " ,- . I , . ',- 1 'I' 51, 7 1 ,I, I Osceola Orive RZ 00-014 17 / /7./1 This. pattern indicates LL~/ ~ subject parcel ~~@ '...,I :Ji~~ r-~, ; 'I i ì l ¡ '-....' ,,.-, { , . , ' , { , . I , I' from 1-71-;-1 Tupelo Street ~~~ ___' 41s 61 71819 1O¡lf II2¡/J --~ I I~I 1 I I II , Russ Rood , -2-4 f 5 Iii 1,18 91 III -,--1 1 I~I I I " -,' I I I I ,} ,) -15- ~I fT 111119120 a1zz I ¡ Ulrich Road -'---1 I i'C, 1 I I I _2_--1 IS 'I' IS 19 1 ¡II Z¡1J If , (1) ::> c: (1) > <C ~ OJ " c: a OJ 6 ~~® ~5~ Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map prepared November 1, 2000 .~ f r ThiI....,__~Ior--'p.rv;ng_roIInn:a_'""". WhIIofNllq_,..._..-lapr<M<lo.........__OIX:U'... ~_tllt.llI.....i1Ion<Iodlar......~bindIng_ N '-' -...I Miami Latin Church ôning J [ T Mallord Court " ~ 5- 3 10 ----------------- D < ~ " , , ,. ,/ " û " Ii " " ,. ..../ ----------------- t I IJ 1Z 15 1- lZ ~1 r~-r-__;,-1 1i4- "6-1 -1 1----j----1 1--..1---1 IS 10 IS I 10 -~ >-.--h--~ >-.--fii--I .J L_~.l~!...J l_"-Î1~.J _J L.!_L.!_J I_~_I-.!_J I I III I ,. I I 14 T I -, r-,g-ì-61 '-i9-1-61 l I ¡ I I I I I I I I ' I I 1'1 15\ 41'\21'1 IS ¡ 41 J I t II L ....1_L.........1. J-1 L-L í -ì--- I I-TiT I I, I :5141,: zL : I I 15141'121'1 ; I ; I ; I i I RZ 00-014 ~/~/1 . , . ~ --------------- AR-1 J , , , . ',' Osceola Drive This pattern indicates subject parcel of God 1J¡1Ji@ :¡¡:¡¡~ í-', j ì I ì i i \.....' ,.....-, / ' . , , ' . , ,~_/ -;-"1 -4 --~ , " " -.- R~ ...... TupelaStreel 1Ji1JiVi I 415 6J '1619 ¡lOt" lit!!' 2 I Iß.\I I I I I I Russ Road s161h,IB 91 Þ::IIH I 1¡o¡I I I I, I I J ",I" /81,,120 21122 I Ulrich Rood -'--1 I ¡cc I I I I I _2_-1 ¡s 6 I' 16 19 I I" 21" ~ J 1Ji<61! RS-2 2~ I I 1Jis~1 I I I I Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map prepared November 1,2000 ¡ L t; . TIQ!TIIJ..._oompiedlcl_..ponnIn...,........,..,._<>f'IIo _......,. ""","1Iat -'''-10 pI'tIYido the mooI<:uTanI.-.j-=--- irJlclmlalionponblo.l.noIi'Mndo<Ilct......Ioo;IoIYœ-.g~ ,- \ .... -...I Church of God L Miami Latin and Use o J D.IJ Mallard Court ,. " ----------- o !ì !I !\ Ii RS!\ U '" " '" ----- . , ! < RU ~~@ . ~--------------- ------------- Z IJ 12 1 1"U-1¡,.-1 - --ð-t-;o-i ~ ~--k--~ .J L_~.l~~.J 1 I 17 t ' I -I 1-~-lr-ï ì ï-,g-I-;-i I I I I I I I' J IS: 41 J: 21/ [ .J_L.I--1. í I, I I I ·-ì--- I I I I I 15141JI2JI I I I 1:1 I /2 IH-+--;-1 I--.J---i 15 I 10 ~--T1i--1 I_':.,:!L!...J I" , I 1-.-1---;-1 1-i9~-61 I I I I I I I S "I J 2 I' I J-, ~i I I-TIT I 15\41.1121,1 I I I: 2 ':.- Osceola ,- . \ I . ',- J , I, I Drive RZ 00-014 17 / /7/1 This. pattern indicates LL/-:-./..L.J subject parcel :!!:!!~ í-') ; 'I j 1 \ ¡ ........' ,.....-, J . . \ \ . . I ,~_.: RU I .1' 1-71-;-1 Tupel(lStreel ~~~ P IF "156"1 ¿'¡'9 JIOI/I' 1J210: z I 1&1 I I I I I Russ Road _;_14 s I,I~I. ,I I, I, ---I I I I I I I , " -- I I I I z~ ~ . 15- .1 , Ul'1¡g120 21122 Ulrich Rood _I_- I liC I I I I. I _2_-1 I' Ii ¡71' [91 I Ii" 14 J '" :> c '" > « ~ '" " c o '" ë5 ~~@ RU ~$iS í!. Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map prepared November 1, 2000 \ ThiornAP_-'oompIIed/tlr_oI~_-""""pupooeo"""". "jT!, _~IIIorI__~1O",_lhormol...",.-,o:_.,.,.... in/ntmod"",_ibIo.I.""'~",,_".IoogoIIytw>1ing~ -0 0 <.9 '+- 0 .£: "<t 0 T""' '- 0 :J I .£: 0 0 0 c N ã5 a: ....J E Cd :?: '-' " '- < , < , § . I e w~~~ ~ ~ "~ l ~ ç Z ::J o Ü - o.oOM Nl~I'3õi8- ""'- " a: w ; ! > ! ä: w ã m ~ I. ~ z « ð ;?; ('fDU JOOIII8!10'Ü ì ~---- ~ [ ! ¡ õiI~ i 1_ ~ '''ow O]]N'i No) l'NI') , w i , ~ ~ ~ S r( .L os ~, .L S 9[ J. AlNn08 3380H833>10 ..." ------ Z · a ~ . 0 " ~ 0 . · 0 a ~ · o.~ '" 0 " · .. · . 0 · i ,0 ø::;~ > .- ! . ~ , " . . v- a , ~" z , ~~ ~ ¡ · \ " " · ,- · , ~""" a . [ , a:;; ,<1..,,0"- o 0. ~ . u · · " · ~ ~ 0 · " -- ~ -J/-~tIífI:ß~ w ~ ~ ~ ~, ~-----oflî~¡¡-· '~, ç Z ::J o Ü w z ~ « ::E :I D!OY NOL1II¥) , , '''-''' '. ""...... " ~ \.z-:> 'YNY:J (.---/ /1,,;1]/ w ~ ~ ~ ~\-i,.y;¡/-./ ..~, / / I ../"'\ // ~~ .. '-' 'WI Miami Latin Church of God RZ 00-014 17 / / 7 ./1 This pattern indicates rL.~/..LA subject parcel WWWWWWWW>WWWWWIWIWWWWW~ ~~~~~~~~€~~~~~. ,~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~6g~6~8- ~S~6~8= ~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~ 8888Ñ~88 =8_NWNN88Ñß~ 00000000 00000000000 00000000 OOOWOWNOOON~ WNN_OO~O OOONO~~~~OW Õ g ~ g Õ Õ ~ ~I ~ ~ :g ~ Õ Õ ~ ~ 8 Õ :g 0000-000 OOOOQOOOONO S; 5: := ~ ~ ~ ~ ß! g ~ ß ß := :z 5: 2 g S := ~ ~I~I~ ~~t~rl'~Þ.r!~I.~iê~I3'+~Q QfQIW ~ ~tg¡t.·g¡·I'r,.~ ['.~!~I~I~ ~I~ ~ ~IŠ::¡:¡ :['~[~ ~ ~I~Iª ~ ~ l[ì.~íj.3 o ¡..........:....... -:- =::: t!!~;~: ~. ¡!!.ì::;s Jo 0 ¡t1I i '~I:t'Þ C/)::s, " ,¡ : [I> CI1 ¡~¡ g ¡~. !~!~ ¡~. 1.CD ::1-6 .., 0 IQQ 'S", :'"1''"1, 10 :0 ¡~ ;~ , ''VljCf.l ¡; I ì 1 " ' S'16' I ì 'í I I : ¡ I ¡ I , ;; I. ;.; ¡('¡In; I : ' . I g:: ~ ~,·~",·~~.ŒI ~ L:'~ I'~~~~~" f~~g.~t'~ §'I ~~-¡~t~r~r. ~I fPl~~lgr-rl I~-I' ¡ tg¡r~-~I~i.· ~ ,.,::::: ,-" é:1~ p.. 0 0 0 " '" ¡.¡ I¡'¡ l¡¡i I¡J I'" 1f,J- §¡I~ (E'" 1·.' :<> :<> :<> 1ì' 15:115:'15:: 1>1 ." ~ ,"" >, 'I '1"'0",,,,,1"',-1 '" ,,' ,,~ ê""'= a ' ~ 'I"", ø. > 'I' I I ¡......C) , -«I ¡¡...I.., , " ...., Z' I . I , 'ö I I' ,tT1Itx:1 tx:I, 'NI ,N I I ''-<I I I I I I I I I ! ¡I, I' ' !¡ , g. I,'" I I I,! ,I ' ,i, I ! I ì "Ii !ùl-~Iill' i ~II!~ flJ~~i;lif· li. ,¡~!~~I[I-i-jlf~llirl-t~II"i'-3~1 ¡~ ~! !a.. § ~ ê:: ~~! 1:1 ~ í~ : ¡a! ¡æ ¡g. ! ~ I I I~ ¡ ii~;' n, i~~: I Oil i I II ~[~rlf I: :J-.: !~Î I I, i:"'¡ I Ø> 0' g ¡g g g I ¡ 1 !~ rQ ia i iØ>"~! jia ,'" ~ g:: < tT1tT1tT1 tT1 tx:I I! I~ l'-<I::r:1 I I'" i I;;;' j¡: I I ,'" Ii' ",>1" ++1" ' I I I Ii .¡, -j 1 -rT-t-- I -¡---+- '-1""'"'' -11-" I!:<> I 1 ::r:, ! 'i i' ,,2: I ig.i ! I 'I ! I i~ II I" , , 1 , ' , 118: i lal I 1 I I. I~i ! I Ii, i Ii! I ! ! i 11;;,.1 : ¡ ,,1 ¡ I j 1 I L....L....I I I i ¡ J, ',.: : Ii! ' II Ii '---"r-'"T-- I ! r---r--1---t r"-w ¡ : I Ii! : i i 1 i ~ ~l~-'!'§r~ ~ $ ~ Vl 00 00 00 00 Vl ~ g §lš ~ ~Ig ~ ~ ~ 0 .þ. ool:;oj......¡lo 0 \0 00 0\ 0\ c::: :;0 VJloo :;0 Vl N t:tI ~ gj!~ '~I~ ~ .. '" ~ ¡f g. [ [ g. if ~ ~ tl ~ ~ Ifltl ! ~ ~ ~ _ '" n "," '" ~:I: '.. ~ ~ ,.,. ~ N ¡;¡ .., .., .., .., " " ~ ~ "":<> 5, ~ ,.. ~ 0 .- N ~I""'I"" ~ ~ II'" cn s~&.p..ÇL.o ø.v, :;Oþdþd:;dg.g.cn cn :;dQ.~ cnp..,cn ø.VlVl,ø.!þd~II~>'ø.¡ t ~ 3 ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ø.¡ø. ø. ø. I-t ¡I-t ~1~,ø.1 t:tIl~1 1~ ~! t~'ø. Q.. < 1~ II' "~ ~ ~I~I ~I '" 'i !~It'" I'" I ~r '" ~I ~'I I" I~II ;;, '" "','" I ,I, ": ' [ ;.: [1~i~1!~j!~[: ;~,!I!¡I!~!~t~;;!t,!r,¡ d~r!l~r[ll[rfli !~~i!r!,I~i~:~!~j' õ' ~ (i)'!õiõ'!õ¡6! ¡õ·!1-t lõ· õ' (6·.êii·¡êii'Õ· õ'(\' õ'lõ¡õ'llb iõ' õ,;,õ'lõ·l~ jl-t '(D·;,Õ',ë;'!Õ·:Õ'i'I·, .1,' ;:j r--d'd-'djd~d¡ d did d d d dlb!M1d-M_oIB b-MB' , B:(:JiBI8'(:J! , (t) ¡:: (b: (11 (b i (11 ~ I (11 I ! (11 (11 ('Ø ('Ø ('0 ('0 ('0 1('0 i 0 10 ! o! '0 1('0 10 ! 0 ; ('0' ('0 ! <'tI 1('0 ('0 ¡' ., ~ ; .: ¡ ¡ !! i j:: i ' ! I ; : : ; . _ ! : ; -I H "' "'¡''''¡:'ij¡;':¡''I·'i1~-;I.i,j", 'T1.'T1rl'T1 'T1", "iii,jI",T";;1>;iT..;;!,;;¡iI",·r,:;j¡';¡T'iit'i1';;¡t;;:¡t"'¡','i1f..;;¡r.¡;'1. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~i<~,~,~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~I~ ~,~~!~!~ ~'~'~!~I~ ~I~'~~~:'"" I : ; ! i I I I ' ,: ;,! !!' . "~; ~ ~ ~ ~r~i§i~r*1~1~I~ì,~~j~!~¡~I~!~r,~r~r~1~r~l~i*l* ~i~l~i~I~II~! 1'0 1'0 1'0 ~ ~'!f t;:cro!t;->It;¡t;->_t;it;->:~'~it;'-Jit;->;t;'-Jit;->' t;..L~:t;->¡~!~I~ ?1~1t;'-J!~:t;'-JL ::~o ~ .h ~ .þ. .þ. - .þ. Od.;.J'W;W¡I.,,¡.Ji.W''¡:''''¡:''IW¡W¡W'.þ., W¡'¡:";W'I'¡:"'OO +:oo:wIWIW;.þ." ............ ~ w ~ ~ 8 8Î~ ~JIÑ¡~!~I~'I~!~I~¡gl~¡~¡~'I~!wl~i~¡~ 8¡Ñ Ñ ~'~1~¡~;2!; :;~ ~ v, ~ ~ ~'O ~,~lolooioo:oo!ooIO!~I-!-I"""¡,.þ.!¡,NI.þ.!OIN!V,!~ 0 ~I"""¡!-i-il !-~ N :,.:~;;';__};..;:;__.: _.!~.'.n ,,~;L ......___ ' 9 't.f[~~~~~~ o -0__00 1..0_0\000\0\0 ~ .... 0\ .þ. 0\ 0\ Vl V, 0°0_0000 -d~~ w - W W N N 0;.....10 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 OJ ¡N¡O 0 0 0 0 -I ¡.þ. -IVl N 00 0\ O! ,0 0 0 0 0 0 01 101°10 0 0 0 0, 10 0 0 0 0 0 w: ¡W1lJJ .þ.IW _......¡ ~"":;:. <:':1.' ;:jfc;;ti/illtr' '" ~=I:<> :<> =- (i I~ S" ¡o 0 0 0 0 0-< ê,!& & ~,~ ¡f- ¡:;;. ~ Q 0 ¡('þl<'tl ¡<'tI,O t;j ~ a.;~:;:;1; 0 Eií ;; 1:1 VJ WI(')IW ~~. ~ ~~~~ .þ.ooo VJNWW 0000 0000 OO(,,¡.J(,,¡.J _ ......¡ 0\ (,,¡.J 0000 0000 0000 _.þ.O\O i:=(") .. 0 =3 S' 3 ~ = t"" e. ~.~ " -.t:; ~ ~ Ii ~ s-li ~"O 'i 03 !I <? t'Þ !! Q =:: ~ l'"to! .¡:,. t:;¡, ~~ " ... ..' i:= ;¡ I 0;' 3 II 3 a¡ i t: 7'1i ~ 011 ..... t'Þ It = 0 Ii (")~II' ::r ..' = "0 I, ~ e::: ::r "'I o .....1, ...., = 'I 0<>'11 o ., II ¡:¡. 3 I, ~ Ii 0'·1' o ,: = ,! CI> II '< I' tn i1 f"to.i' '" II a II tn I, i' II II ¡i II II I. il II II I; Ii -I' II ¡: I! ii 'I II ¡, _··-~·:dl . '-' -...I w w w >-3 ;::: n ... ... ... 0 0 0 ., ., 0 '" '" '" Þ< ~. 8 w w w ..... - - - - S' 8 - - - I: 0 0 0 <JQ = 0 0 0 '110 t"" = - - - ~. w ..... - ~. ~ 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 ..,. 0 0 0 õ' I: W 0\11.0 I '" ~_J~"f~··_·l .., < ~ '" ::i!:::i!i::i!¡IZ - 0 o !O ~ 0 i' c.:> '0 0:010 ila 0 8 p..,Q..,P..:, 0 ~'~:~ i' '" , '" ~'~:1:; Ii....... p..,p.. p,.' ii ".,,!-l.ij !W¡WIW!lZ~! o:o!o ¡Jc.:> .¡ :otI:ot::ot"8 . .....,¡......'......!!("p ¡!N Ii ___." __ii______J; ::i!1::i!,::i!!:zH ¡o;o iO il~ ; :8.:8..18.118 '- I~ i~ I~! ""I ¡r:;!r:; i~I!IW¡¡. : p,.¡ !:J,.,ø., : L__J_"h;;j~._~i ',i"'i"¡i"IZ',: ,°1° ° I ., " !g"ig" g"1 !3 Ii ala¡a ¡""II !t"'it"'I~I.>.ii :__..,:".~.L L_J! "z" . I¡i~ ii ,1'8 'I rÞ HUI: , ! , ;-''-ir¡ i.,I~i I", II",) - - - ~;:-!~-: ..........,"-':!>: 0,0'.,0 I' p. 'i '---¡-Q..!' ~~i~la i o 010 VJ ~ ~ i~ 00 ¡z¡iC/)1 .... .....t"'t-, : II I! :: i' i ~"".'T1;'ii'~-: :O!OjOi~~1 :-:::\..i::¡:::¡i """'" : ""'",,',,,,1,'< " [(;"(;<(;'11 .'"'1,'"'1 '"'I; q;¡ ¡g R ,! :i , : ITJr~T{II-êz¡ , t'" t"'1 S' ,..,. ,,," :i w w W'f' ...... ""IN a ~ ~,-a' t;J t;-J,~il o OiO!: o O'Oi: g g 8ii ..., 't'" ---_.--_.~----_.. Q = : :¡: ;; I õ' '" ..,'0 ., ;:::;¡ ~. 8 ., '" ë. ;; I t"" I I ~Ç') -. rø I = 0 i nl1,9¡ -' ~ ., , = '0 .., =-1 " -. =-'"' o ..... ..,= Ç')õ' 8. a ., ..,. õ' = t:I> '< '" ..,. "' ~ I' i II I I , I t Ii " ¡: II ,- II \I , , , ¡ 'I '. __ _J .,....... '0 'I........ liw ':....... '---- o o '-' ...., . .... ..... .. ...... ., ..' .... .... . fti!mi~~:l~\~~'a:Jffl] ð:IOJo..dIr~.!'\~.Kmu .~51"'1.M(O '.JW,1~ Letter of Support for Miami Latin Church of God's Request For Rezoning of Property at 5905 Oleander Avenue from AIRIto RF St. Lucie County Board of County Commission Dear Commissioner: I am writing this letter on behalf of 1'\ ew Hope Baptist Church located at 5200 Oleander Avenue in support of the rezoning of property on Oleander Avenue ITom Agricultural/Residential I to Religious Facility for the Mianù Latin Church of God. . The Miami Latin Church of God has been operating under the name of Prince of Peace Church for more than 3 years ill St. Lucie County. For the past 2 'Ii years since August 1, 1998, they have shared facilities with New Hope Baptist Church at 5200 Oleander Avenue just \ei mile or 7 blocks north of the property being considered for rezoning. Prince of Peace Church (Miami Latin Church of God) under the leadership of Pastor Eduardo Urena has been an active pal! of the White City/Oleander Avenue community since August 1, 1998. They have provided Christian care giving, evangelism and discipleship to the surrounding communities and joined other neighborhood churches in joint worship services. They have also provided strong financial and volunteer help in maintaining our grounds and constructing our new Children and Youth Ministry Building. Prince of Peace (J'vliami Latin Church of God) has been conducting worship services on Tuesday evening, Friday evening and Sunday afternoon, Since they have been ill operation in the White City COllllllUtùty since August 1, 1998, there will be minimal increase of traffic when they build their new buildingjust two blocks south oftheir current location. I anl sorry I am not personally able to speak to the Commission this Tuesday eve¡ùng, Jan. 9,2001 in support of this zoning change as I originally planned. I am presently at Palm Beach Gardens Hospital undergoing cardiac evaluation. Fellow members of New Hope Baptist Church and my fanùly are most supportive of the Board of County Conunissioners approving the zoning change and having Prince of Peace (:vliami Latin Church of God) as our long term Christian neighbors at 5905 Oleander Avenue. Christ's Humble Sen-ant Don Hinkle Chairman of Deacons '-' AGENDA REOU'\!oJr ITEM NO. A-l DATE: January 9. 2001 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [X] Leg. [ I Quasi-JD. [ X ] 4 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBJECT: Public Hearing to consider demolition of South 35~ Street, Fort Pierce, Florida. Head i ding at 2014 ¡ SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works BACKGROUND: The Building located at 2014 South 35~ Street, Fort Pierce, Florida, has been determined to be unsafe by the Building Official. The County commission has declared the building to be unsafe and now must hold a public hearing to consider appropriate action to abate the safety hazard. FUNDS AVAIL.: Other Contractual Services, Acct No. 102-2415-534000-200 PREVIOUS ACTION: The County Commission declared the building at 2014 South 35" Street, Fort Pierce, Florida to be a public nuisance on November 14, 2000. .. RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to the provisions of Article III of Chapter 2-5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws. County Staff recommends that the Board enter an order to repair or demolish the building at 2014 South 35t. Street, Fort Pierce, Florida by April 15, 2001. If the building is not repaired or demolished by April 15, 2001, the County shall demolish the Building and assess the entire cost against the real property where the Building is located. COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] APPROVED [] [ ] OTHER: DENIED as Anderson County Administrator Cocrdination/Sianatures County Attorney: purchasing: Other: Mgt &: Budget: Originating Dept: Finance: (copies only) : (6ØAgendll.2nd - 2014 South 3S'k Street) '-' ...., MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CODE COMPLIANCE DIVISION TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Raymond L. Wazny, Building Official i~ DATE: January 4, 2001 SUBJECT: Request for Order to Repair or Demolish unsafe building at 2014 South 35th Street, Fort Pierce, FL On September 28, 2000, the building at 2014 South 35th Street, Fort Pierce, FL (the "Building") was inspected by the Building Official of St. Lucie County, FL and was determined to be unsafe and to constitute a nuisance. On November 14, 2000 the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to Article III of Chapter 2 -4 of the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws (the "Code"), declared the Building unsafe and ordered a public hearing. Because the Building has not been repaired or demolished and continues to constitute a nuisance, Staff recommends that the Board, pursuant to Section 2-5-43 of the Code, enter an order as follows: 1. Laurel Enterprises, as the owner of the Building, shall obtain a building permit and repair or demolish the Building by April 15, 2001. 2. If the building is not repair or demolished by April 15, 2001, the County shall demolish the Buildings and access the entire cost against the real property where the Building is located. Submitted: RLW:e c H:\WP\CONDEMN\68memodemo2001.2nd '-' ...., BUILDING OFFICIAL REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2000 BUILDING AT 2014 S. 35TH STREET, FORT PIERCE, FL The grey frame building at 2014 S. 3Ý' Street, Fort Pierce, Florida, has been damaged and is manifestly unsafe and unsanitary for use as a single family dwelling. This building is in such a condition as to constitute a public nuisance. Specific conditions which exist include: damaged interior walls and ceilings, damaged plumbing damaged electrical wiring missing doors and windows. damaged structure Under the provisions of Section 302.1.1 of the Standard Unsafe Building Code, the building at 2014 S. 35th Street in Fort Pierce, FL is determined to be UNSAFE. , P.E. RLW:ewc 68inspection.lst j 2014 S 35TH ST 10/23/00 UNSAFE BUILDINGS I ~ ~ o 1 " i'lí ~' È - C'> ~ (j) 52 ~ Canal No.7 2014 South 35th Street Communit.y Development. Geographic Information Syst.ems N /" ..... AGENDA REOuWr ITEM NO. A-2 DATE: January 9, 2001 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING Leg. [ I Quasi-JD. [ X ] [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBJECT: Public Hearing to consider demolition Angle Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. 1412 SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works BACKGROUND: The Building located at 1412 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, Florida, has been determined to be unsafe by the Building Official. The County Commission has declared the building to be unsafe and now must hold a public hearing to consider appropriate action to abate the safety hazard. FUNDS AVAIL.: Other Contractual Services, Acct No. 102-2415-534000-200 PREVIOUS ACTION: The County Commission declared the building at 1412 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, Florida to be a public nuisance on February 17, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to the provisions of Article III of Chapter 2-5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, County Staff recommends that the Board enter an order to repair or demolish the building at 1412 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, FL by April 15, 2001. If the building is not repaired or demolished by April 15, 2001, the County shall demolish the Building and assess the entire cost against the real property where the Building is located. COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] APPROVED [] I ] OTHER: DENIED Do 1 sAnderson C unty Administrator Coordination/Sianatures County Attorney: Purchasing: Other: Mgt &: Budget: Originating Dept: Finance: (copies only) : (S1A!Jeru1a.211d. - 3.412 An!J1. Road) '-' ...., MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CODE COMPLIANCE DIVISION TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Raymond L. Wazny, Building Official DATE: January 4, 2001 SUBJECT: Request for Order to Repair or Demolish unsafe building at 1412 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, FL On February 17, 2000, the building at 1412 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, FL (the "Building") was inspected by the Building Official of St. Lucie County, FL and was determined to be unsafe and to constitute a nuisance. On November 14, 2000 the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to Article III of Chapter 2-4 of the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws (the "Code"), declared the Building unsafe and ordered a public hearing. Because the Building has not been continues to constitute a nuisance, Board, pursuant to Section 2-5-43 of follows: repaired or demolished and Staff recommends that the the Code, enter an order as 1. Johnnie Stokes, as the owner of the Building, shall obtain a building permit and repair or demolish the Building by April 15, 2001. 2. If the building is not repair or demolished by April 15, 2001, the County shall demolish the Buildings and access the entire cost against the real property where the Building is located. Submitted: RLW:ewc H:\WP\CONDEMN\Slbccmemo2nd2001 '-' "'-" CERTIFIED BUILDING OFFICIAL REPORT DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1999 BUILDING AT 1412 ANGLE ROAD, FORT PIERCE, FL The frre damaged building located at 1412 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, Florida has been damaged and is manifestly unsafe and unsanitary for use as a single family dwelIing. The building is in such a condition as to constitute a public nuisance. Specific conditions which exist include: open and unsecured structure damaged walIs and ceilings damaged electrical wiring missing doors and windows damaged roof Under the provisions of Section 302.1.1 of the Standard Unsafe Building Code, the building at 1412 Angle Road in Fort Pierce, FL is determined to be UNSAFE. ~i t~/frl¿:: RA ND L. Y, P.E. BuiI' Officia St. Lu ie County RLW:ewc 5linspection, 1st ADDRESS: 1412 ANGLE ROAD. FORT PIERCE. FL A B UNSAFE BUILDINGS ¡¡¡ .c :ï' 1412 Angle Rd Comm unity Development Geographic Information Systems N '-' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM~O. --6L DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Donation Agreement - Rock Road Jail BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum fUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMEND A TION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the donation of the Building subject to the terms and conditions of the Donation Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the· Agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: D 91as Anderson County Administrator [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: )r Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Public Works Dir: County Eng. : Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 , '- ...., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-2006 DATE: December 13, 2000 SUBJ'ECT: Donation Agreement - Rock Road J' ail ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: The Rock Road Chapel Association has requested that the County and the Sheriff approve the construction of a building with private funds on County-owned property at the Rock Road Jail. The building will be a non-denominational multi-use facility, Attached is a copy of the Donation Agreement. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the donation of the Building subject to the terms and conditions of the Donation Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement, Respectfully submitted, Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney DSM/caf Attachment "'" ....., DONATION AGREEMENT ROCK ROAD JAIL THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 2000, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the 'County", the ST. LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF, a Florida constitutional officer, hereinafter called the 'Sheriff" and ROCK ROAD CHAPEL ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association hereinafter called the" Association", WHEREAS, the Association has requested that the County and the Sheriff approve the construction of a building ("Building") with private funds on County-owned property at the Rock Road Jail; and, WHEREAS, the County is willing to accept the donation of the Building subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits received by each party, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1. Construction. Using private funds, the Association shall contract with a licensed contractor to construct a building at the Rock Road Jail in a location identified on Exhibit "A", The Association agrees to require its contractor to obtain all required permits and to construct the Building in accordance with plans approved by the County and the Sheriff, which plans are attached to and incorporated in this Agreement as Exhibit "B". The Association agrees to require its contractor to coordinate all construction with the County and the Sheriff, The Association further agrees to require its contractor to complete the Building on or before --=:rDi1/ L , 2001. 2, Insurance. Prior to beginning construction of the Building, the Association shall require that its contractor procure and maintain insurance naming the County and the Sheriff as additional insureds in the following minimum amounts: A, Worker's Compensation: Statutory requirements under Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, including Employer's Liability, for all employees of the contractor and all employees of its subcontractors, if any. B. Comprehensive General Liability: One million and 0/100 dollars ($1,000,000,00) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries and property damage. If any g:\atty\agreemnt\Rock Road Donation Page 1 of 4 '-' ...., part of the work is subject, similar insurance shall be provided by or on behalf of subcontractors to cover their operations. C. Proof of Insurance: The contractor shall provide proof of such insurance to the County and the Sheriff at least seven (7) days prior to commencing work on the Project, 3. Indemnification. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the Association covenants and agrees to hold and keep harmless the County and the Sheriff, their officials, employees, agents, volunteers, against any and all claims, demands, penalties, judgments, court costs, attorneys' fees and liability of every kind and nature whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected or arising out of the performance of this Agreement. 4. Ownership of the Building; Operation Maintenance. The parties agree that upon completion of the building in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, the County shall own and maintain the building. The parties further agree that the building is subject to the operational control of the Sheriff. The Sheriff agrees that the primary purpose of the building is for religious and rehabilitative meetings during the week. The Sheriff also agrees that the building shall never be used to permanently or temporarily house inmates, 5, Non Discrimination. The parties agree that the Building shall be used so as not to discriminate against any person because of age, sex or physical handicaps (except where based on a bonafide occupational qualification); or because of marital status, race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry, 6. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate automatically upon (a) mutual agreement of the parties; or, (b) upon completion of the building in accordance with the approved plans provided that the obligations of Paragraph 4 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. The County also reserves the right to terminate this Agreement for cause by giving the other side ninety (90) days prior written notice and opportunity to cure, 7, Notice. Any notices required hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sent certified mail, return receipt requested, or hand delivered to the parties at the following addresses: To the County: County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, FL 34982 With copies to: County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, FL 34982 9: \atty\agreemnt\Rock Road Donation Page 2 of 4 ¥ ~ To the Sheriff: St. Lucie County Sheriff 4700 West Midway Road Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 8. Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties, 9, In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. 10. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous communications, representations or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed or have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in several counterparts, each of which counterpart shall be considered an original executed copy of this Agreement. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVE~AS TO FORM AND COR E E-: { ~" BY: p- - g:\atty\agreemnt\Rock Road Donation Page 3 of 4 ...... WITNESSES: WITNESSES: g:\atty\agreemnt\Rock Road Donation ...., ST. LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF ~ /, /,' , BY' "',o,.' J'V{¡ . w,dÞ v . NA : Dennis M. Williams. Undersheriff ROCK ROAD CHAPEL ASSOCIATION .y,~~Izt-- NAME: I. . v'rJr? TITLE: p rrs. f!. J2 e.._~ Page 4 of 4 " \/ ,.., "- AGENDA REQUEST 'wIf ITEM NO. ~L DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Twin Vee Powercats. Inc. Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. rx] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: uglas Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: JQ Review and Aoprovals Management ~ BU~dget Corn. Dev. DJ..r.: if applicable) Purchasing: Originating Dept. County Eng. : Finance: (Check for Copy only, Eff. 5/96 "'"' ...., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-2084 DATE: December 28, 2000 SUBJECT: Twin Vee Powercats, Inc. Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement j ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a draft Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement between the county and Twin Vee Powercats, Inc. ("Twin Vee"). Under the terms of the Agreement, Twin Vee will create a minimum of forty (40) full-time equivalent jobs in St. Lucie County. In return, the Agreement provides that the County will provide Twin Vee with a grant of up to sixty-seven thousand five hundred and 0/100 ($67,500.00) dollars payable over a five (5) year period beginning October 1, 2002 or when Twin Vee first hires employees, whichever date first occurs. The grant amount is based on one thousand two hundred fifty and 0/100 ($1,250.00) dollars per job with bonuses. Twin Vee's salary level commitment is ten and 88/100 ($10.88) dollars per hour without taking into account the value of any benefits. Ninety percent (901'0) of the new employees will be St, Lucie County residents. . . RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement, DSM/caf Attachment ......... ...., ST. LUCIE COUNTY JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT TInS AGREEMENT is made as of the 7'" day of August. 2000_ by and between St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida. by and through its Board of Commissioners. hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY and _Twin Vee Powercats Inc.( ) as individual, ( ) a partnership, (X) a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the COMPANY, whose Federal J.D. or social security number is 65-0896146. WI T N ESSE T H: WHEREAS. it is the policy of the COUNTY to stimulate short tenn economic growth in St. Lucie County, by either attracting new businesses to St. Lucie County or by encouraging the expansion of existing businesses within St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS. the creation of new employment opportunities for residents of St. Lucie County and the increased tax revenues resulting from such business expansion or relocation with St. Lucie County is beneficial to the local economy; and , WHEREAS. the Board of County Commissioners has determined that offering a Job Growth Investment Program encourages either businesses to expand or new businesses to enter St. Lucie County and thereby create new employment opportunities for the residents of St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS. St. Lucie County, through its Board of County Commissioners, has created a Job Growth Investment Fund; and WHEREAS. the COMPANY will either relocate to St. Lucie County or expand its existing business in St. Lucie County and thereby create certain new employment opportunities at a certain average salary level in St. Lucie County in accordance with the Job Growth Investment Grant Program criteria if the COUNTY provides to the Company a Job Growth Investment Grant; and WHEREAS. the COMPANY has been detennined to be eligible to receive a Job Growth Investment Grant by the COUNTY's Job Growth Investment Grant Team; and WHEREAS. the COMPANY acknowledges that this Agreement shall be based upon proven perfonnance of the requirements of these grant procedures; and. WHEREAS. the COUNTY fmds and declares that it is in the public interest to award a Job Growth Investment Grant to COMPANY pursuant to the tenns of this Agreement. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow Nov, 2000- 2 -1- ....... -...I NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties do agree as follows: 1. DefInitions. As used in this Agreement, the following tenns shall mean: a. "Annual Average Wage" includes salary. bonuses, and commissions. The Top Executive salary shall not be included in the average wage calculations. b. "Default" - failure to comply with the tenns of the Agreement. c. "Effective Date" - shall have the meaning set forth in Paragraph 3.A. herein. d. "Expansion of an existing business" - A business establishing 5 or more jobs to employ 5 or more full-time employees in the County provided that such business increases operations on a site owned by the same business resulting in a net increase in employment of not less than 5 percent. e. "Full-time Equivalent Job" - shall be established by total payroll hours per year divided by 35. f. "JGI Fund{s]" - shall mean Job Growth Investment Fund(s). g. "New Business" - a business establishing 5 or more jobs to employ 5 or more full-time employees in the County within the tenn of the grant provided that such business fIrst begins operations on a site in the County clearly separate from any other operation owned by the same business. g. "St. Lucie County Average Wage" - As detennined by State of Florida Department of Labor the average annual wage per job in St. Lucie County. 2. Tenn; Tennination. This Agreement shall be effective upon the date of execution of this contract by both parties hereto. and shall automatically tenninate two (2) years after the Effective Date unless tenninated earlier by the County because of a default by the COMPANY. 3. Grant Eli,gibility; Payment Schedule. a. The COMPANY will be eligible for a Job Growth Investment Grant (hereinafter a "Grant") of an amount up to $67,500 which Grant shall be payable as follows: The 5 Year funding: Year 1-200A¡, Year 2- 20%, Year 3-20%, Year 4-20%, Year 5-20% The fIve (5) year period will begin on October 1, 2002 or the date the Company fIrst hires employees. whichever date fIrst occurs (the "Effective Date). The G;\atty\agreemnt\docs\job·grow Nov. 2000· 2 -2- '-' ...., County shall pay $1250.00 per Full-Time Equivalent Job. Bonus criteria shall apply as set forth in Exhibit "B". b. Eligibility Determination; Payment. The initial eligibility determination for payment of the JGI Funds shall be made on the first anniversary of the Effective Date. Subsequent eligibility determinations shall be made at each subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date. Payment of JGI Funds shall be made within forty-five (45) days after the date the COMPANY submits the last annual unemployment compensation report comprising the Annual Job Status Report (as defmed in Paragraph 7), and this payment obligation shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should the date for filing the last annual unemployment compensation report, as described above, not coincide with the date that an eligibility detennination is made, the COMPANY shall have the right to file a report, in form substantially similar to an annual unemployment compensation report, and in such event, such report shall constitute the Annual Job Status Report, the filing of which shall begin the running of the forty-five (45)-day period within which payment shall be made. 4. Relocation Commitment. AB a condition precedent to, and as consideration for obtaining JGI funds from COUNTY, the COMPANY agrees to locate or expand its business operations to St. Lucie County for a period of at least six (6) years to a suitable site as described on Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 5. Job Creation Commitment. As a further condition precedent to. and as consideration for obtaining JGI funds from COUNTY, the COMPANY agrees to create a minimum of 40 Full-Time Equivalent Jobs in St. Lucie County as more specifically set forth on Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The COMPANY's failure to maintain its job creation commitment for anyone year will result in the forfeiture of the Grant amount for those Full-Time Equivalent Jobs not created it was scheduled to receive for that year; however. such forfeiture will not preclude the COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job creation commitment. 6. Salary Level Commitment. As a further condition precedent to and as consideration for obtaining JGI funds from COUNTY, COMPANY agrees to pay each employee whose job is eligible for grants hereunder, a wage of not less than $10.88 per hour, without taking into account the value of any benefits. The COMPANY shall provide written verification satisfactory to COUNTY to such average salaries in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 7 herein below. The COMPANY'S failure to maintain its salary level commitment for anyone year will result in the forfeiture of the Grant amount for those Full-Time Equivalent Jobs where the salary commitment was not maintained it was scheduled to receive for that year; however. such G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow Nov, 2000· 2 -3- ...... ...., forfeiture will not preclude the COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its salary level commitment. 7. Annual Job Status. The COMPANY must provide the COUN1Y with quarterly unemployment compensation reports (Fonn UC6) of its business operations within St. Lucie County on the State fonn UC6 as amended which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "C". The COMPANY shall provide the reports at the same time it provides the State of Florida with the reports but no less frequently than semi-annually. The cumulative unemployment compensation reports required to be filed for the annual period prior to each eligibility detennination shall collectively comprise the Annual Job Status Report. 8. Grant Restriction. The JGI funds available under this Agreement as referenced in paragraph 2 will be provided only for reimbursement of expenses associated with the physical move, relocation and/or expansion of the COMPANY to St. Lucie County including but not limited to corporate or company relocation expenses, infrastructure costs, leasehold improvements, company sponsored child day care facilities. rent for company facilities, lease buyouts, training expenses and other expenses approved by the Job Growth Investment Grant Team.. 9. Default; Termination. In the event COMPANY defaults in the perfonnance of its guarantees and commitments as provided for in this Agreement, the COUN1Y may. at its option, terminate this Agreement. ~ 10. Indemnification. For ten and 0/100 [$1O.00} dollars consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the COMPANY shall indeIIlllifY and save harmless and defend the COUN1Y, its servants, and employees from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, and/or cause of action which may arise from any negligent act or omission of the COMPANY, its agents, servants, or employees in the perfonnance of services under this Agreement. 11. Forum; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Any and all legal action necessary to enforce the Agreement will be held in St. Lucie County or the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida. No remedy herein conferred upon any party is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy, and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing by law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. No single or partial exercise by any party of any right. power, or remedy hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof. 12. Lobbyist Certification. The COMPANY warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the COMPANY to solicit or secure this Agreement and G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow Nov, 2000· 2 -4- ..... ....., that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation. individual, or finn, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the COMPANY. any fee. commission, percentage, gift. or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. 13. No Discrtmination Certification. The COMPANY warrants and represents that all of its employees are treated equally during employment without regard to race, color. religion, disability. sex, age, national origin, ancestry, marital status, or sexual orientation. 14. Attorneys' Fees. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with any provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees, court costs and all expenses (including taxes) even if not taxable as court costs (including, without limitation, all such fees, costs and expenses incident to appeals), incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which such party or parties may be entitled. 15. Enforceability. If any tenn or proVIsIOn of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such tenns or provision, to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and every other tenn and provision of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. The COMPANY's fallure to maintain its job creation commitment or salary level commitment for anyone year will result in the foIfeiture of the Grant amount it was scheduled to receive for that year; however, such foIfeiture will not preclude COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for those subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job creation and salary level commitment. / f 16. Assignment. COMPANY shall not assign this Agreement to any other persons or finn without first obtaining COUNTI's written approval. 17. Conflict of Interest. The COMPANY represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the peIfonnance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes 112.311. The COMPANY further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said peIfonnance. 18. Notices. All notices required in this Agreement shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested and if sent to the COUNTI shall be mailed to: G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow Nov, 2000- 2 -5- '-' -...I With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce. Florida 34982 and if sent to the COMPANY shall be mailed to (current, official address): Twin Vee Powercats Inc. 1666 Village Green Drive Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952 19. Entire Agreement. The COUN1Y and the COMPANY agree that this Agreement sets forth the entire Agreement between the parties. and that there are no promises or understandings other than those stated herein. None of the provisions, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement may be added to, modified, superseded or otherwise altered, except by written instrument executed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida. has made and executed this Agreement on behalf of the COUN1Y and COMPANY has hereunto set its hand the day and year above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk CHAIRMAN f APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney cF' . ':;th~¢¿T~.... '/41 ú/e<- G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow Nov, 2000- 2 -6- ........ ...., EXHIBIT "A" TO THE JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND Twin Vee PowerCats Inc. (To be completed by Program Administrator) Company Identification and Information: #65-0896146 - Boat Manufacturer Applicant code number: 00-5 Application date: August 7, 2000 Company description: Boat Manufacturer (SIC 3732) Company new location address: 1666 Village Green Drive Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952 Company new mailing address (notify County of new address when known): G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow Nov, 2000- 2 -7- '-" ...., EXHIBIT "B" TO THE JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND TWIN VEE POWERCATS, INC. (To be completed by Program Administrator) I. Target Industry Category eligible for application. Industries must eitber fall in tbe manufacturing, researcb & development, or the energy sector: A viationlEngineering (eligible for 10 % cluster bonus) Agriculture/Aquaculture /Food Processing (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) BusinesslFinancial Services (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Computers and Electronics Industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) BiotecblMedical/Pharmaceutical Industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) X Marine Manufacturing Industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) SportslRecreation Manufacturing Industry (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Research & Development related industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Companies that utilize green technologies (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) National Corporate Headquarters (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Other (not eligible for cluster bonus) II. Application Section Criteria: X Expansion (40 jobs) Relocation <- or jobs) , I 1 III. Employment Commitment: COMPANY is receiving this grant based upon its representation that it will bring the foUowing employment opportunities to St. Lucie County: 1) 81 Total number of employees (new and existing) expected during term of grant 2) 4õ" New, full time employees (eligible for grant application) expected during term of grant 3)"9õ% of County residents (to be verified by employee's quarterly unemployment coiiiPeñsation report) 4) $10.88 Average salary of all employees to be employed by company except for Top Salary 5) $10.88 Average salary; St. Lucie County average (TO BE COMPLETED BY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR) Attach a copy of USC 6 Form G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow Nov, 2000- 2 -8- '-' ...., EXHIBIT 'c' GRANT AWARD CALCULATION ffi Grant Amount: ...!.. Base Amount (~x Dollars per job) (40 jobs) Bonuses (use 10% x base amount on each of the following: 50 or more total jobs (10% bonus) 50% or more local hires (10% bonus) 75% or more local hires (20% bonus) X 90% or more local hires (25% bonus) Average salary for applicant's jobs will be 125% of St. Lucie County average salary (10% bonus) Average salary for applicant's jobs will be 150% of St. Lucie County average salary (20% bonus) Average salary for applicant's jobs will be 175% of St. Lucie County average salary (25% bonus) +_$17,500 Total Bonuses $67,500 Total Grant (base amount + total bonuses) Road Impact Fee Reimbursement $67,500 Total Grant (including road impact fee) G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job·grow Nov, 2000· 2 -9- "'" -...I JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT (JGI) PROGRAM PROCESS Application Review, Approval and Funding: 1. Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopt JGI Program guidelines. 2. BCC establish funding for JGI Program. 3. BCC establishes a Job Growth Investment Grant Review Team (Review Team) comprised of seven members whose composition includes four (4) Chamber of Commerce representatives, one (1) each from the City of Fort Pierce and Port St. Lucie, appointed by their respective city managers, and one (1) from the County appointed by the County Administrator. 4. The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners (SLCBCC) Economic Development Division (EDD) produces collateral material promoting JGI Program and application forms. 5. Applicants will submit written project details to the SLCBCC EDD and the Program Administrator including anticipated number of new hires during the term of the grant, job descriptions with starting salaries. The grant agreement shaD be performance based. 6. SLCBCC EDD receives and screens applicants for qualification recommendation. , 7. SLCBCC EDD submits aD applications to the Review Team for consideration and/or approval. 8. Applications recommended for approval are to be submitted to the Program Administrator for verification and presentation to the Board of County Commissioners. 9. The Program Administrator shall inform the applicant, by letter, of the Review Team's recommendation and the date, time and place the Board of County Commissioners will consider the approval. 10. JGI grant agreements are presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval and execution (consent agenda when standard contract is adhered to and regular agenda when standard contract is not used, indicating the effective date of contract if not the BCC approval date of grant agreement). 11. Community Development Director (CDD) receives invoices with receipt documentation from approved applicants, checks the invoices, removes all invoices ineligible for reimbursement, and makes a determination of compliance with grant agreementJJGI fund program. 12. MBM approves invoices and submits item to Clerk of BCC (Finance Department) for audit and payment. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow Nov, 2000~ 2 -10- '-' ..., 13. If there is any dispute over the eligibility of costs submitted for reimbursement, then such dispute shall be submitted to the Review Team for recommendation. The Review Team shall refer unresolved issues to the BCC for review and action. 14. The Program Administrator will monitor COMPANY regularly to confirm compliance with targeted hiring goal. 15. COMPANY will supply quarterly unemployment compensation reports to the Program Administrator as required by the agreement, and documentation as necessary to the Program Administrator, for use by SLCBCC in its annual report to BCC at the end of the 12-month period following operational start up, demonstrating that the job creation and salary level commitment were achieved. The COMPANY's failure to maintain its job creation or salary level commitment for anyone year will result in the forfeiture of the Grant amount it was scheduled to receive for that year; however, such forfeiture will not preclude the COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for this subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job creation and salary level commitment. 16. The Program Administrator will monitor COMPANY annually to determine its economic impact of its relocations or expansions. I G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow Nov, 2000- 2 -11- ....... -wi JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT (JGI) FUND JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM CRITERIA I. Fund Administration: 1. Job Growth Investment Fund ("Fund") monies will be managed and dispensed by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners ("Board"). 2. The St. Lucie Economic Development Division (SLEDD) will be the executive agent for accepting applications for Fuud monies. The SLCEDD wilI review each application received to ascertain the extent to which it meets the criteria presented below. A copy of the application will be forwarded to the Program Administrator. The SLCEDD will recommend consistent applications to the Job Growth Investment Grant Review Team for review on a weekly basis. 3. The Review Team must evaluate and, ü appropriate, render a preliminary commitment (approval) within fourteen (14) days of the SLCEDD Director's presentation, and schedule each approved application for final consideration at the next availahIe meeting of the Board, but not more than fourteen (14) days from Review Team action. This time criterion for Board consideration may be extended upon request of the SLCEDD or by the Board or the Program Administrator. 4. Recognizing that the funds for the Job Growth Investment Fund Program are limited, the Commission may prioritize, approve, disapprove and/or modify grant awards (including awarding of authorized bonuses) for the program at its sole discretion. II. Application Selection Criteria: 1. Any industry expansion within St. Lucie County or relocation to the County that encompasses: AviationÆngineering, Agriculture/Aquaculture Food processing, Business and Financial Services, Computers and Electronics Industries, BiotechlMedical/Pharmaceutical Industries, Marine Manufacturing Industries, National Corporate Headquarters, SportslRecreation Manufacturing Industry, Research & Development-related Industries, industries that utilize "Green" technologies and other industries. 2. Expansion/relocation will create 5 new jobs or more, paying (an average ot) at least 100% of 51. Lucie County's Private Sector average salary/wage level. A lower average wage may be accepted hy the BOCC if the impact is off-set by the number of jobs created or by a large investment into the community or addresses a special need of the community. 3. The total direct economic impact of the project to the County including the number, type, and quality of the jobs which will be produced in the County during the construction of the project and thereafter; and G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job·grow Nov, 2000- 2 -12- ...... -...I 4. The direct economic impact of the project to the County including the number, type, and quality of jobs which will be produced in the County as a result of suppliers, service providers and vendors serving the project. II. Grant Limits: 1. The maximum for grant award is a maximum of $2,000 per new-job created; larger per job awards are possible for those companies meeting Bonus Criteria. 2. The maximum grant award is $500,000, with potential for larger awards upon recommendation of the SLCEDD, the Review Team and approval by the Board. 3. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, the grant award will be phased in over a two (2) year period as follows: Year 2 (grant awards ofIess than $25,000) (a) Year 1 - (b) Year2- 50 % of grant) ) on anniversary date 50 % of grant ) Year 6 - Grant A wards of more than $25,000 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (t) Year 1 - Year 2 - Year 3 - Year 4 - Year 5 - Year 6 - 20% of grant) 20% of grant) on anniversary 20% of grant ) date 20% of grant ) 10% of grant 10% of grant 4. Funding awarded per job created: 5. Bonuses may be granted by the Board based on the following criteria: (a) Company line of business is within the industry clusters identified in Exhibit "B", Section I; or (b) Job Growth within 12 months exceeds 50 jobs (10%) (c) The average per-job salary/wage projected in a subject application is greater than 125% of St. Lucie County's average private sector salary/wage (10% bonus); jobs greater than 150% of St. Lucie County's average private sector salary/wage level (20% bonus); jobs greater than 175% of St. Lucie County's average private sector salary/wage level (25%) bonus. ~ (d) In addition to the bonus criteria set out above, a 10% bonus may be awarded if at least 50 % of jobs are filled by residents of the County who have resided G;\atty\agreemnt\docs\job·grow Nav, 2000· 2 -13- ...... 'oJ in the County at least one (1) year prior to the application; a 20% bonus if that number exceeds 75% ; and a 25% bonus if the percentage of local hires is at or above 90%. The grant award amount will be based upon the number of jobs created; Funding A warded: JOBS CREATED AMOUNT PER JOB 5 -19 20-49 50-99 100-149 150 and over $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $1,500.00 1,750.00 $2,000.00 v. Reimbursement of County Road Impact Fee Payments Any business that applies for and qualifies under the JGIG program, may, as part of the JGIG, apply for reimbursement of County Road Impact Fees for new construction associated with the expansion or relocation. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow Nov, 2000- 2 -14- ~'c·'_-;"'~:~~-~ --'-~-- ~--_. . ~ MANUFACTURING Ind....,., Group lnduetry No. No. 373 SHIP AND BOAT BUILDING AND REPAIRING-Con. 3731 Ship Building and Repairing-Con. pairing Tankers (ahips), buildirtg and repairing Tellderø (ships), building and repairing ---- Towboats, building and repairing ( ~Boat Building and Repairing Establishments primarily engaged in building and repairing boats, Estab- lishments primarily engaged in manufacturing rubber and nonrigid plastics boats are classified in Major Group 30. Establishments primarily engaged in operating marinas and which perform incidental boat repair are classified in Transportation, Industry 4493; membership yacht clubs are classified in Serv- ices, Industry 7997; and those performing outboard motor repair are classified in Services, Industry 7699. Traneport veøael.ø, pasøenger and troop: building and repairing Trawlen, building and repairing Tugboata, building and repairing Bo.t ]dta, DOt a model Boø.ta, fibelgIa.: building alId repair- ing Boa...__ Boat.: motorboats, sailboats, rowboats, and~andrep8Îring Canoes. building ud ~ Dingbi... -...- """,,,building"'_ -....... ..... Houseboats, building and repairing H)'drofoilboate Kayalu. buiJdilIgand repairing Likboa... building... _ LiferaIta, ucept inflatable !rubber and -, Motorboata, ÎlIboard ud outboard: buildillgand repø.iring Pontoons, except ain::raft: and inflatable (rubber-andplastiœ) Sk:iffa, buildillg and. repairing 374 RAILROAD EQUIPMENT 3743 Railroad Equipment Establishments primarily engaged in building and rebuilding locomotives (including frames and parts, not elsewhere classified) of any type or gauge; and railroad, street, and rapid transit cars and car equipment for operation on rails for freight and passenger service. Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing mining cars are classified in Industry 3532. Repair shops, owned and operated by railroads or local transit companies, repairing locomo- tives or cars for their own use are classified in Transportation, Major Groups 40 and 41. Establishments primarily engaged in repairing railroad cars on a ccntract or fee basis are classified in Transportation, Industry 4789; and those repairing locomotive engines on a contract or fee basis are classified in Serv- ices, Industry 7699. Brakes, railway: air and vacuum Cars and car equipment. freight or pas- .....' Dining cars and car eqWplDent Engines, steaJn aoc:omoti~) Freight C8l"II ud car equipmellt lndll8tria110c0ñîotÎVel! and parts Interurban calli and car equipment Locomotives. loc::omoti.ve fnmtf!8, alId ...... Lubrication syatema, locomotive Mining locomOOTe8 and pørtII Railroad car rebuilding RaiI-way maintenance C8l'I Railw.y motor can Rapid tmnait can and equipment Sleeping can, railroad Streetcars alId car equipment Switching looomotiV1:!8 and parts. elec- tric andnone1ectric Taot freight can ud car equipment Tenders, locomotive TroUey buseø, tracklesø 239 "" ""-t1Ì 7: ..... ..... ::r: a ~ 'Tj 'Tj 0 n n c: 0 " c: ::¡' .., .., ¡;. 0 0 :r ::I " 00 ~ ::I ::I .::::: 00 - 0.. ::I c: c: " V> ë ::0;- " V> 5' .., i:;, ~ " ~. :r 0 F- 9, c: .., ..... 3 g, " ? "" 0 V> .'" "" :r n ..... "" Ji' :;:::! 0 C/) ::I 00 00 z ñ' 7: ..... " V> 'Tj :r 00 " ~ (1 0 ñ' '< en " " cr" ::I 00 00 0 < ::0;- c: .., " ::I " '< V> 0.. ::I ~ ~ ~ 00 " ";J .>. 'Tj U1 "0 U1 ";J t¡j - ";J - 'Tj 0-. ó1 v.> 'Tj - 'Tj 0 \0 'Tj - 0 - 0 .>. 0 - 0 <' -..¡ 0 0-. 0 U1 - 0 \0 0 :-> \0 0 IV .... \0 .., 0 .., U1 .., IV .., -..¡ .., - .., .>. .., 0 ::¡ 0 ::¡ IV ~ ~ ~ ~ P- IV ~ - ~ IV ~ - ~ 0-. \0 IV C/)C/) ";J C/) C/) t¡j C/) C/) ";J "0 ";J ";J ";J e- m ¡;. c: e- " ~ C/) ~ n ¡;' 0 _. z ¡;. 0 ¡;. C/) ¡;. a ::I t""ã t"" ~ t"" 00 0 " 00 .., t""' (1 .., V> .., (1,< .., " .., - .., 00 c: n C;;' c: c " " ::!. " 00 " ::I " ::I " C 0 " " ~ " V> " - " ::I ." 0.. " 0.. " 0 " " ::I . 0 -. .., "'" 0 ~...... ¡;' è ¡;. ¡:;' "'" 0 "",'" "'" 0.. "'" ¡:;, "'" n " ::0;- .>. .>. .>. " .>. \0 :-> n "'" .., v.> \0 .., .>. 0 \0 .., .>. ::I \0 ¡: ""':;:::! "'" .>. 0 .>. n :;:- \0 ::!. \0 .>. ::¡. U1 U1 t¡j C' 00 .>.o .>. \0 V> \0 0 " 00 00 cr" U1 \0 " 0 - < 0 IV \000 " 00 U1 C IV " < IV < ~o.. U1 .>. IV ... P- " ";J "'" ~ .., ¡:;' " " .>. IV .>. "'" U1 U1 U1 U1 0 U1 U1 0-. IV 0 \0 00 \0 00 "'" \0 -..¡ U1 "'" U1 U1 \0 0 \0 0 .>. , , , , , , , , , , 0-. U1 - -..¡ U1 U1 IV IV v.> 0-. U1 \0 "'" 00 0 00 0 \0 0 .>. , , , , , , , , , , U1 \0 -..¡ - IV 0 - \0 0 - IV U1 - 0 -..¡ v.> U1 00 0 0-. IV 00 \0 .>. 0 0 U1 .>. 00 0-. \0 "'" .>. 0-. U1 0 \0 00 00 IV IV .>. IV .>. IV .>. .>. IV IV U1 .>. U1 \0 \0 .>. U1 .>. .>. U1 IV "'" 0-. 0 "'" "'" 0-. \0 0- 0-. 0 "'" - - .>. U1 -..¡ -.J .>. -..¡ - .>. U1 0-. .>. \0 \0 0 0 00 \0 "'" U1 0-. 0-. .>. U1 -..¡ - \0 0- , , IV IV -..¡ "'" U1 0-. "'" - -..¡ - .>. -..¡ ~ ¡::¡ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ IV ~ ~ - IV IV IV ~ "'" ~ IV IV -..¡ C<J .>. ~ "'" IV 0 IV 0-. 0-. 23 ~ ~ 0 ~ \0 ~ \0 ~ 23 0 \0 0 \0 ~ 0 ~ \0 0 0 \0 \0 -..¡ 0 \0 \0 0 -..¡ -..J ! C/) ¡:;; ::::: t"" " 00 ~. ::I "" m m3 :;¡"E. " 0 ,,'< :=. (\) < " " æ: 000 00 V> ~ ~ " " .. .., Ot"" " _. õ ~ cr" õ' " .., .., ....., - .0 §, IV ::I 0 < 0 c " " "0 0 :E " ... n 00 ~ V> - ::I ~ "I1- o -.] "" - ~o "0 (;' n "" 0> (') '" '" e:. w...., .¡:..'" ~:=1 o~ ('1) ;:0 o on (=;' ."" t:r1 a on ~ "ON o U> ..., U> ~ C/Jt:r1 ~ on b~ c: >< (') ¡;. Ci ..., w:;' .¡:..'" "" 00 .¡:.. U> "" - , N - , w 00 - - .¡:.. N o o -.] .¡:.. o - ---- N o ---- o o ;:0 2- 5' on .... 0> on o '" ~:-o g; 9 ?-to "I10 l'>< wN .¡:..OO ",,00 "".¡:.. U> U> "" N , U> .¡:.. , 0-. -.] w .¡:.. W 0-. W -.] W U> - o ---- - ---- "" "" ....... ;:0 (=;' ::r 0> "" 0- '" o .'" C/J ('1) 0> '" "0- o 00 ::1.;S C/J ,...C/J l'~ g n (D' ~ w~ .¡:..o ~tt:I w< p.. - w "" , 0-. 0-. , "" w - - N W U> -.] .¡:.. 0-. U> ---- - N ---- "" 00 ;:0 '" '" ~ .?' ;¡;. '" s- o '" '< :-< "I1N o 0-. ~~ "0 ñ' CI:1 ..., N (') -.] ,,(tJ ;r ~~ ""(J ~$?. o 00 - , 0-. 00 , o U> o 00 N "" o - -.] u> u> ---- N .¡:.. ---- "" "" "0 õ> 0> '!" ;:0 '< 0> '" ~ (=;' ::r 0> ~ "O.¡:.. o - ;:;..¡:.. C/JZ ,...t:r1 l'C/J g 2- (þ' 0.: wo> .¡:..Q ""..., 00(') w" - U> -.] , 0-. .¡:.. , -.] .¡:.. 00 o .¡:.. W N W .¡:.. u> N ---- - .¡:.. ---- o o "0 0> '< ~ o '" þ<: '< 3 ::r '" ::!. '< N 0-. N , -.] w , - W N 00 N 00 U> N W -.] U> ---- - -.] ---- "" "" "OCi g :-t ~ C/J ,... l' c: (') ¡;' w .¡:.. "" U> w "0 0> (Q !' ;:><: ('1) '" '" ('1) ~ ::r ~ - u> -.] w C/J ~ l' ('1) ~. '" (Q ~ o '" "0- o u> ;:;'0-. ~~ . t:r1 ~tt:I " c: -. ..., ('1) '" w _. .¡:..'" ",,(Q u>n N,... - o o , w N , "" w - 0-. w u> .¡:.. "" o -.] "" ---- - 0-. ---- "" "" ,¡"", o Z !:!. .... 0> on o '" ~ "0- o 00 ;:;''''' C/JN ~C/J bt:r1 c: C/J D. ~ ('1) := wo .¡:..'" ""Ci 00"" w' - .¡:.. - , -.] N , 0-. U> - - N .¡:.. - -.] o N N ---- N N ~ "" ~ c: :=1 0> ':"- l' 0> :¡ '< "Ow o 0 "" -.] ~- ~C/J . t:r1 ~tt:I " - _. 0> ('1) " w:><" .¡:..::;: ",,('1) u>:= NCi :-' u> 00 "" , N 00 , - u> 0-. U> .¡:.. - -.] -.] - u> , N -.] ---- w ---- o o ~ " ~ '" " ':"- .... o on ::r ¡I1 l' 0> "" '" ('1) '" C/J ::r ::¡. " '< ?" "ON o N "" - ~ C/JC/J ¡:~ g < (i)' £. w~ I~ =;- 00"'" .¡:..'" "" :-' u> "" - , w 0-. , -.] - 00 -.] u> N u> 0-. - "" DC ---- -.] ---- o o - N U> , u> o , o U> "" .¡:.. C/J ~ 0> ~ l' ('1) 0> on 5' (Q t:r1 t:r13 ....,"0 ~õ (')'< :=. (';I <: " r> ~ Cio> 0> on ññ ..., Ol' ~ Ü;' o ~ ::rÕ' ~ "" ...., ?::;: N :;' 0< or> or> "0 o ::;: '" "" n ~ on - '" !' u> N - u> "" - -.] ---- N 00 ---- o o ""'" ..., -< :E :E >-J >-J >-J >-J ~ CIJ CIJ ., 0 ., ., ., N '" ., "" 0 =- c:: '< ~ Õ " on = 0- = on Õ ¡:;- 0- 0 q<> JÕ on 0 c:: 3 ."" 0 "" ., ."" ."" .(; 0 :3 0 tJ 3:: ~. ...... m .@ n c:: ., ., 3:: ., {)Q ~ 00 m ?" <: ~ 3 {)Q '" ...... ::!. 00 õ.: Co " ~ " ., '0 ~ ~ on "" on "1:1 " "" on "" n ~ Ñ 0 " " ., '" ::. = ..., on tJ 00 ~ 00 õ "" t"'1 " = " ... "1:1 0-, "T1 - "T1 w "T1tt1 N "T1tt1 N "T1 u. "1:1 - "1:1 - "1:1 0-, = u. 0 'D 0 u. 0 - o - 0 o - 0 0 0 0 ...¡ 0 u. 0 ... ... "" ...¡ ;:¡ 0 "" ... "" 00 u. "" 00 u. ;:¡ u. "" N "" 00 "" w u. ~ 00 00 ~ - ~{)Q 0 ~{)Q 0 ~ N ~ - ~ "T1 CIJ "1:1 "1:1 "1:1' "'. "1:1 > CIJ CIJ CIJCIJ 0 :E ~ z (Õ. n -. z (õ' - 0 (õ' - 0 (Õ. N ,... CIJ ~ CIJ ,...m ;:¡ " ::E 0 " ., - ¡:;- - ¡:;- ., ::E :E "'=- "" a ri~ "" , ..., , "" ¡:;- " " "n c:: (') (') -., (') ., (') _, on (') ::r: " " " " - " ., c:: > c:: n c:: ., "'0 = 0 0= 0 = (') (') (') - "" " (õ. ., w ., w"" w wOo w w 00 w > (õ. ~r (õ. c:: -. 3 (') "" "" ... 00 ... tJ ... " ... " ... "" " 0 " -, w ~ 'D 0 'D 'D ..., 'D ..., \0 <: ~ w= .¡:..= ~ r' w on w ¡;;. won .¡:..{)Q 'D" 00 > 00 u. > u. > 00 ... 0 ... .¡:..o 00'< N N 0 :< 0 <: - 'D ttI \0 CIJ 'DtJ 'D"1:I <: " 00 00 ,... w:E r' <" 00"" 00 _. .¡:.. w W. N~ ., p.. on '< u. N u. u. u. u. u. U. N W \0 a- 'D 00 00 'D \0 \0 .¡:.. ...¡ 0 U1 0 'D 'D u. - U1 'D 0 , , , , , , , , , , ...¡ 0-, N ... w w 0 - ... u. 0 N .¡:.. 'D .¡:.. N - 0 ...¡ 00 , , , , , , , , , , ...¡ .¡:.. N W 0 \0 W ...¡ N N U. 0-, a- N N U1 U. 00 ...¡ 00 N ...¡ 00 'D N N ...¡ u. w U1 00 .¡:.. ...¡ N U. ...¡ .¡:.. N u. ...¡ u. w U. N N N .¡:.. U. .¡:.. W 0 00 - 'D U1 U. N - W .¡:.. \0 W - 0-, a- a- w u. ...¡ --.J .¡:.. ~ a- - --.J 00 00 N --.J 00 N ::::¡ 00 .¡:.. \0 0 N W 00 'D 0 --.J N a- - 0-, --.J a- 'D , N --.J - --.J U. --.J .¡:.. 0 --.J N 00 -... - -... -... -... -... - -... -... -... w -... - N - N -... - N W -... 00 0 00 --.J 0-, N --.J W - 0 -... õ -... õ -... ...¡ -... -... -... 0 'D \0 'D -... 0 0 'D 'D 0 \0 0 'D 0 0 0 'D 0 CIJ ~ ., ::::: " " ., on 5' {)Q m m3 :;:"2- " 0 (')'-<: =. (tI <: " " 3:: tJ., ., on (; ~ " .. .... 0 c (') ~ ~ 0 Õ' 0- " .... "" >-J ~ ~ ~ ~ N = 0 < 0 0 " " "1:1 0 ~ " "" n ~ on - = !" ........ :¡..., , î'1' \0 DEG 2 0 " :¡NT. ;.;.~- DEPARTMENTOFCO~TYDEVELOPMENT (Economic Development Division) MEMORANDUM Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Kathleen H. Stubbolo Economic Development Division DATE: December 18, 2000 SUBJECT: JGIG - Twin Vee Boats cc: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development The Job Growth Investment Grant Committee met today and reviewed Twin Vee Boats application, The committee believes the company meets the criteria for approval. Please agenda Twin Vee PowerCats Inc, for the Board of County Commissioners, Attached is the original application. Thank you. - I t 'w I.··~ \PI \' t(J~. J) \~{...:.. \~t\j \}-!' .., I, \-" "w" AGENDA REQUEST ...., ITEM NO. Lt. C/ DATE: December 9, 2001 REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [] 4 CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: ~ I SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Robert O. Freeman Bond Counsel , SUBJECT: Resolution No. 01-34 - Authorizing the Issuance of Special Assessment Improvement Bonds (Rouse Road MSBU Project), Series 2001 4 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: t PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Resolution No. 01-34 as drafted. [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ouglas Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: county Attorney: Q 94'" Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for copy only if applicable) Eff. 5/96 i Chariene Furtado - #6503 v1 - M-BOARD SERIES RESO.wpd ~ Page 11 SSQUlRE ~DER5 I LEGA¡'-' COUNSEL WORLDWIDE squno.f, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Members of the Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie County, Florida FROM: Robert O. Freeman RE: $245,000 Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 2001 (Rouse Road MSBU) DATE: January 4,2001 Pursuant to Resolution No. 94-196, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of the County on September 20, 1994 (the "Master Resolution"), the Board authorized (a) the acquisition and construction of certain water and/or sewer and roadway capital projects within municipal services benefit units ("MSBU") created within the County and (b) the issuance ITom time to time of bonds to finance the costs thereof. Each series of bonds will be payable ITom certain revenues of the County, including special assessments levied on the property benefitted by the project. The attached Resolution, which is supplemental to the Master Resolution, authorizes the acquisition and construction of certain paving and drainage improvements in the Rouse Road MSBU and issuance of not exceeding $245,000 principal amount of Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 2001 (Rouse Road MSBU), to finance the costs thereof. The Bonds will be payable ITom (i) the special assessments levied within the Rouse Road MSBU, (ii) the moneys on deposit in the sub accounts established for the Bonds, and (iii) the Investment Earnings allocable to such special assessments. No taxes or other County revenues are pledged. cc: Daniel S, McIntyre, County Attorney Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator Becky Padrick, MSBU Coordinator Christann K, Hartley, Finance Director 6S03v 1128902-00 I03/M-BOARD SERIES RESO '-' -...I SERIES RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. 01-34 (ROUSE ROAD MSBU) A RESOLUTION SUPPLEMENTING RESOLUTION NO. 94- I 96 OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE ROUSE ROAD MSBU; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF NOT EXCEEDING $245,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2001 (ROUSE ROAD MSBU), OF THE COUNTY TO FINANCE THE COST OF SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE BONDS FROM CERTAIN PLEDGED REVENUES, INCLUDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS; MAKING CERTAIN COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: ARTICLE I AUTHORITY, DEFINITIONS AND FINDINGS Section 1.01 Authority for this Resolution. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 125, Part I, Florida Statutes, Ordinance No. 87-77 ofSt. Lucie County, Florida (the "County"), and other applicable provisions oflaw (collectively, the "Act") and Section 5.0I(F) of Resolution No. 94-196, adopted on September 20, 1994, as amended and supplemented (the "Master Resolution"), and is supplemental to the Master Resolution. Section 1.02 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the capitalized terms used in this resolution shall have the meanings specified in this Section. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Section shall have the meanings specified in the Master Resolution. Words importing singular number shall include the plural number in each case and vice versa, and words importing persons shall include firms and corporations. "Bond Resolution" means, collectively, the Master Resolution, this Resolution and all resolutions amendatory hereof and resolutions supplemental hereto, "Rouse Road MSBU" means the Rouse Road Municipal Services Benefit Unit created pursuant to Resolution No, 98-081, of the County adopted April 7, 1998. "Rouse Road MSBU Assessment Resolutions" means the resolutions adopted by the Board with respect to the Rouse Road MSBU providing for the levy and collection of the Rouse Road MSBU Special Assessments within the Rouse Road MSBU, including Resolution No, 00-284, adopted on December 19, 2000, and any resolution supplemental thereto or amendatory thereof. "Rouse Road MSBU Project" means the construction of paving and drainage improvements "- ...., within the Rouse Road MSBU and all costs incidental thereto as permitted by the Assessment Act. "Rouse Road MSBU Project Costs" means the cost of the acquisition and construction ofthe Rouse Road MSBU Project and the construction and acquisition of additions, extensions, and improvements thereto including, but not limited to: the acquisition of any lands or interests therein or any other properties deemed necessary or convenient therefor; engineering, accounting, and legal fees and expenses; expenses for plans, specifications and surveys and appraisals; expenses for estimates of costs and of revenues; the fees of fiscal agents, financial advisors and consultants; administrative expenses; interest on the Rouse Road Bonds for a reasonable period of time after the date of their delivery; reasonable reserves for the payment of Debt Service with respect to the Rouse Road Bonds; discount upon the sale of the Rouse Road Bonds; the cost of purchasing any Credit Facility with respect to the Rouse Road Bonds; such other expenses as may be necessary or incidental to the financing authorized by this Resolution, to the Rouse Road MSBU Project, and to the placing of the Rouse Road MSBU Project in operation; and reimbursement to the County for any sums expended for the foregoing purposes in anticipation of the issuance of the Rouse Road Bonds, "Rouse Road MSBU Special Assessments" means the special assessments levied within the Rouse Road MSBU pursuant to the Rouse Road Assessment Resolutions. "Rouse Road Bonds" means the County's Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 2001 (Rouse Road MSBU), herein authorized, "Rouse Road Pledged Revenues" means with respect to the Rouse Road Bonds, (i) the Rouse Road MSBU Special Assessments levied within the Rouse Road MSBU, (ii) the moneys on deposit in the Rouse Road Sub accounts established for the Rouse Road Bonds, and (iii) the Investment Earnings allocable to such Rouse Road MSBU Special Assessments (the "Rouse Road Investment Earnings"). "Rouse Road Subaccounts" means the separate accounts established and maintained pursuant to the provisions of this resolution for the benefit of the Owners of the Rouse Road Bonds, 2 6483VI/28902-00103/R~SER1ES RESO '-' -...I "Master Resolution" means Resolution No. 94-196, adopted by the Board on September 20, 1994, as amended and supplemented from time to time. Section 1.03 Findings. It is hereby ascertained, determined and declared that: B. It is necessary and in the best interests ofthe health, safety, and welfare ofthe County and its inhabitants that the County undertake the Rouse Road MSBU Project. The County is authorized pursuant to the provisions of the Act and the Assessment Act, to undertake the Rouse Road MSBU Project. C. The County is without adequate, currently available funds to pay Rouse Road MSBU Project Costs, and it is necessary and desirable and in the best interests of the County that it borrow the moneys necessary to accomplish the financing of the Rouse Road MSBU Project. The County is authorized pursuant to the provisions of the Assessment Act to borrow moneys necessary to pay the cost of the Rouse Road Project. D. The County anticipates receiving the Rouse Road Pledged Revenues, and the Rouse Road Pledged Revenues are not pledged or encumbered to pay any other debts or obligations of the County. E. The Rouse Road Pledged Revenues are estimated to be sufficient to pay the Debt Service on the Rouse Road Bonds and to make all other payments required to be made by the provisions of the Bond Resolution. F, The principal of and interest on the Rouse Road Bonds, and all required payments into the Rouse Road Subaccounts, shall be payable from and secured solely by a pledge of and lien on the Rouse Road Pledged Revenues, Neither the County, nor the State of Florida or any political subdivision thereof or governmental authority or body therein, shall ever be required to levy ad valorem taxes to pay the principal of and interest on the Rouse Road Bonds or to make any of the required payments into the Rouse Road Subaccounts, and the Rouse Road Bonds shall not be secured by a lien upon any property owned by or situated within the corporate limits ofthe County other than the Rouse Road Pledged Revenues in the manner provided herein. Section 1.04 Resolution and Master Resolution to Constitute Contract. In consideration of the acceptance of the Rouse Road Bonds authorized to be issued hereunder by those who shall be the Registered Owners ofthe same from time to time, this resolution and the Master Resolution shall be deemed to be and shall constitute a contract between the County and such Registered Owners. The covenants and agreements in the Master Resolution and herein set forth to be performed by the County shall be for the equal benefit, protection and security ofthe Registered Owners of any and all of such Rouse Road Bonds, all of which shall be of equal rank and without preference, priority or distinction of any ofthe Rouse Road Bonds over any other thereof, except as expressly provided therein and herein, 3 6483VI12890Z--0O103iR-SERIES RESO '-' ...., ARTICLE II AUTHORIZATION OF ROUSE ROAD MSBU PROJECT; AUTHORIZATION OF ISSUANCE OF ROUSE ROAD BONDS; DESCRlPTION,DETAlLS AND FORM OF ROUSE ROAD BONDS Section 2.01. Authorization Of Rouse Road MSBU Project. The Board hereby specifically confmns the authorization of the Rouse Road MSBU Project. The Board hereby specifically ratifies and affirms all actions previously taken in furtherance ofthe Rouse Road MSBU Project. Section 2.02. Authorization of Rouse Road Bonds. Subject and pursuant to the provisions of this Resolution and the Master Resolution, obligations of the COIlllty, to be known as "Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 2001 (Rouse Road MSBU)," are hereby authorized to be issued in an aggregate principal amount on original issuance of not exceeding Two Hundred Forty-five Thousand Dollars ($245,000) for the purpose of financing the Rouse Road MSBU Project Costs. Section 2.04. Description of Rouse Road Bonds, The Rouse Road Bonds shall be numbered; shall be in such denominations or maturity amounts; shall be dated; shall bear interest at not exceeding the maximum rate allowed by law payable on such dates; shall mature on the first day of such month, in such years, and such amounts; and shall be issued as Current Interest Bonds, Serial Bonds, Term Bonds, or any combination thereof; all as shall be determined by the Board at or prior to the time of sale of the Rouse Road Bonds, The Rouse Road Bonds shall be issued in fully registered form without coupons; shall be payable with respect to principal at the office of the Registrar, as paying agent, or such other paying agent as shall be subsequently determined by the Board; shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America; and shall bear interest from their date, or from the most recent date to which interest has been paid, payable, by check or draft mailed, on or before the Interest Payment Date, to the Registered Owner at his address as it appears upon the books ofthe Registrar as of 5 :00 P.M. Eastern Time on the Record Date. Section 2.05. Form of Rouse Road Bonds, The text ofthe Rouse Road Bonds shall be of substantially the form of Exhibit A attached hereto, with such omissions, insertions, and variations as may be necessary and desirable, and as may be authorized or permitted by this resolution or by subsequent resolution or resolutions adopted prior to the issuance thereof, and as may be necessary to reflect the characteristics of any particular installment of Rouse Road Bonds, 4 6483V 1/28902-00 103/R-SERtES RESO '-' ""'" ARTICLE II AUTHORIZATION OF ROUSE ROAD MSBU PROJECT; AUTHORIZATION OF ISSUANCE OF ROUSE ROAD BONDS; DESCRIPTION,DETAlLS AND FORM OF ROUSE ROAD BONDS Section 2.01. Authorization Of Rouse Road MSBU Project. The Board hereby specifically confirms the authorization of the Rouse Road MSBU Project. The Board hereby specifically ratifies and affirms all actions previously taken in furtherance ofthe Rouse Road MSBU Project. Section 2.02. Authorization of Rouse Road Bonds. Subject and pursuant to the provisions of this Resolution and the Master Resolution, obligations of the County, to be known as "Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 200 I (Rouse Road MSBU)," are hereby authorized to be issued in an aggregate principal amount on original issuance of not exceeding Two Hundred Forty- five Thousand Dollars ($245,000) for the purpose of financing the Rouse Road MSBU Project Costs. Section 2.04. Description of Ronse Road Bonds, The Rouse Road Bonds shall be numbered; shall be in such denominations or maturity amounts; shall be dated; shall bear interest at not exceeding the maximum rate allowed by law payable on such dates; shall mature on the first day of such month, in such years, and such amounts; and shall be issued as Current Interest Bonds, Serial Bonds, Term Bonds, or any combination thereof; all as shall be determined by the Board at or prior to the time of sale of the Rouse Road Bonds. The Rouse Road Bonds shall be issued in fully registered form without coupons; shall be payable with respect to principal at the office of the Registrar, as paying agent, or such other paying agent as shall be subsequently determined by the Board; shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America; and shall bear interest fÌ'om their date, or fÌ'om the most recent date to which interest has been paid, payable, by check or draft mailed, on or before the Interest Payment Date, to the Registered Owner at his address as it appears upon the books of the Registrar as of5:00 P,M. Eastern Time on the Record Date. Section 2.05. Form of Rouse Road Bonds. The text ofthe Rouse Road Bonds shall be of substantially the form of Exhibit A attached hereto, with such omissions, insertions, and variations as may be necessary and desirable, and as may be authorized or permitted by this resolution or by subsequent resolution or resolutions adopted prior to the issuance thereof, and as may be necessary to reflect the characteristics of any particular installment of Rouse Road Bonds, 4 6483V1/28902-00103/R·SERIES RESO ........ '-' ARTICLE III APPLICATION OF PROVISIONS OF MASTER RESOLUTION Section 3.01 Application of Provisions ofthe Master Resolution, The Rouse Road Bonds shall for all purposes be considered to be Bonds issued under the authority of the Master Resolution and shall be entitled to all the protection and security provided therein for Bonds. The covenants and pledges contained in Section 3.01 and 3.02 and in Article V of the Master Resolution shall be applicable to the Rouse Road Bonds herein authorized. Section 3.02. Security for Rouse Road Bonds. (A) Pledge And Lien. The Rouse Road Bonds shall be secured forthwith equally and ratably by a pledge of and lien upon the Rouse Road Pledged Revenues. The Rouse Road Bonds shall not be or constitute general obligations or an indebtedness of the County as "bonds" within the meaning of the Constitution of Florid a, but shall be payable from and secured solely by a lien upon and pledge of the Rouse Road Pledged Revenues as provided herein and in the Master Resolution. No Owner of any Rouse Road Bonds shall ever have the right to compel the exercise ofthe ad valorem taxing power ofthe County or taxation in any form of property therein to pay the Debt Service on the Rouse Road Bonds, The Rouse Road Bonds shall not constitute a lien upon the Rouse Road MSBU Project or upon any property of or in the County except the Rouse Road Pledged Revenues in the manner provided herein and in the Master Resolution, t (C) Series Subaccounts. There are hereby created and established in the Funds and Accounts created and established pursuant to Section 3 .03(A) ofthe Master Resolution the following Series Subaccounts, hereinbefore defined as the "Rouse Road Subaccounts:" (1) in the Sinking Fund, the "Rouse Road Bonds Subaccount," which includes (a) the "Rouse Road Bonds Debt Service Subaccount," (b) the "Rouse Road Bonds Bond Amortization Subaccount," (c) the "Rouse Road Bonds Reserve Subaccount," and (d) the "Rouse Road Bonds Redemption Account." (D) Use of Rouse Road Pledged Revenues. All Rouse Road MSBU Special Assessments and Rouse Road Investment Earnings shall be applied and deposited in the manner provided in Section 3,04(A) and (B) of the Master Resolution only into the Rouse Road Subaccounts. Moneys and Authorized Investments on deposit at anytime in the Rouse Road Subaccounts may be used and applied only in the manner provided in Section 3.04(C) of the Master Resolution for the payment of Debt Service on, or the Redemption Price of, the Rouse Road Bonds. Moneys on deposit in the Rouse Road Subaccounts may be invested and reinvested only in Authorized Investments in the manner provided in Section 3.05 of the Master Resolution, Section 3.04 Remedies. Any Registered Owner of, or any Credit Facility Issuer for, Rouse Road Bonds shall have available the remedies specified in Section 5.03 of the Master Resolution. 5 6483VI/28902-00JOJ/R-SERJES RESO '- .....i ARTICLE IV APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS OF ROUSE ROAD BONDS There is hereby created and established in the Project Fund created pursuant to Section 4.02 of the Master Resolution a Series Subaccount to be known as the "Rouse Road MSBU Project Account." Proceeds of the Rouse Road Bonds to be used to pay Rouse Road MSBU Proj ect Costs shall be deposited in to the Rouse Road MSBU Project Account and used solely for the purpose of paying Rouse Road MSBU Project Costs, subject to the provisions of Section 4,02 of the Master Resolution regarding (a) conditions for expenditure of moneys, (b) investment of moneys application of Investment Earnings, and ( c) use of moneys remaining after completion of the Rouse Road MSBU Project. , 6 6483VI!28902-00103IR-SERIES RESO '- '-' ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section 5.01. Special Assessments. (A) Perfection of Special Assessments; Completion of Projects. If not previously completed, the CountywiTl forthwith, whenever it shaU first be timely, complete the Assessment Proceedings, including adoption of the Rouse Road MSBU Assessment Resolutions necessary for the lawful levy of the Rouse Road MSBU Special Assessments against aU lands and properties speciaUy benefitted by the construction of the Rouse Road MSBU Project and the coUection thereof in an amount equal to or not less than the aggregate of the Debt Service Requirements on the Rouse Road Bonds to be paid fi-om such Rouse Road MSBU Special Assessments. If any assessment made with respect to any property shaIl be either in whole or in part annuIled, vacated or set aside by the judgment of any court, or if the County shaIl be satisfied that any such assessment is so irregular or defective that the same cannot be enforced or coIlected, or if the County shall have omitted to make any such assessment when it might have done so, the County covenants that it wiIl take all necessary steps to cause a new assessment to be made for the whole or any part of any improvement or against any property benefitted by any improvement of the Rouse Road MSBU Project, in the manner provided by law, and in any case any such second assessment or an initial Special Assessment for one that shaIl have been omitted, shaIl be either in whole or in part annuIled, vacated, or set aside, or be unenforceable or uncoIlectible by reason of defect or irregularity, the County shaIl obtain and make other assessments until a valid assessment shaIl be made. The County wiIl also complete the Rouse Road MSBU Projects or cause the Rouse Road MSBU Projects to be completed. t (B) CoIlection of Special Assessments. The County wiU coIlect the Rouse Road MSBU Special Assessments in the manner provided in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes, and other applicable provisions of law. The County wiIl take or cause to be taken aU actions necessary to diligently enforce the payment of all of the Rouse Road MSBU Special Assessments and all of the instaIlments thereof, interest thereon and penalties therefi-om, in the manner prescribed by the Master Resolution, this Resolution, and the laws of the State pertaining thereto. Section 5.02. Sale of Rouse Road Bonds. The Rouse Road Bonds shaIl be issued and sold at public sale, private placement, or negotiated sale at one time or in installments fi-om time to time and at such price or prices consistent with the provisions of the Act, the laws of the State, and the requirements of this Resolution, Section 5.03. Continuing Disclosure. In the event that the Rouse Road Bonds or an instaIlment thereof are sold to an underwriter, the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to enter into a continuing disclosure agreement with the Registered Owners of such Rouse Road Bonds or instaIlment thereof. Such agreement shaIl be for the benefit of such Registered Owners and shaIl provide and set forth the County's covenant to provide certain annual information and notification of certain material events, in compliance and consistent with the recent amendments to the Rule. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything else in this Resolution, any such agreement shall apply only to such Rouse Road Bonds are subject to the Rule. The County shaIl not be required 6483VII28902-00103fR_SERJES RESQ 7 "- '-' to enter into any such agreement with respect to Rouse Road Bonds, or any installment thereof, which are not subject to the Rule. Section 5.04. Severability of Invalid Provisions. If anyone or more of the covenants, agreements or provisions of this resolution should be held to be contrary to any express provision oflaw or to be contrary to the policy of express law, though not expressly prohibited, or to be against public policy, or should for any reason whatsoever be held invalid, then such covenants, agreements, or provisions shall be null and void and shall be deemed separate from the remaining covenants, agreements, or provisions of, and in no way affect the validity of, all the other provisions of the Master Resolution or this resolution or ofthe Rouse Road Bonds. Section 5.07. Repealing Clause. All resolutions of the County, or parts thereof, in conflict with the provisions of this resolution are to the extent of such conflict hereby superseded and repealed. Section 5.08. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon the final approval hereof, . 8 6483VII2B902-0010J/R-SERIES RESO ..... -' Passed And Adopted by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida at a regular meeting duly called and held this 9th day of January 2001 ST, LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Chairman, Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: t Clerk of the Circuit Court, ex officio Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney 9 6483Vl/28902-00103fR-SERJES RESO ,-. ...., EXHIBIT A FORM OF BOND No. $ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF FLORIDA ST. LUCIE COUNTY SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT BOND, SERIES 2001 (ROUSE ROAD MSBU) t DATE OF ISSUE CUSIP RATE OF INTEREST MATURITY DATE REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: A-I 6483Vl/28902-00103/R-SERIES RESO ..... ...., St. Lucie County, Florida (the "County"), for value received, hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner designated above, or registered assigns, solely from the special funds hereinafter mentioned, on the Maturity Date specified above, the Principal Amount shown above, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the corporate trust office of as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent, and to pay solely from such funds, interest thereon from the date of this Bond or from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid, whichever is applicable, until payment of such Principal Amount, at the Rate of Interest per annum set forth above, such interest being payable on , and thereafter on of each year by check or draft mailed on or before the Interest Payment Date, to the Registered Owner at his address as it appears, at 5:00 P.M, Eastern Time on the fifteenth day of the month preceding the applicable Interest Payment Date, on the registration books of the County kept by the Bond Registrar; provided, that for any Registered Owner of one million dolIars or more in principal amount of Bonds, such payment shalI, at the written request of such Registered Owner be by wire transfer or other medium acceptable to the County and to such Registered Owner. The principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. This Bond is one of a Series of Bonds, originally authorized to be issued in the aggregate principal amount of $ , oflike date, tenor and effect, except as to number, interest rate, and date of maturity, issued to finance the cost of the acquisition and construction of paving and drainage improvements within the Rouse Road Municipal Service Benefit Unit (the "Rouse Road MSBU Project"), under the authority of and in fulI compliance with the Constitution and Statutes of the State of Florida, including particularly Chapter 125 Part I, Florida Statutes, Ordinance No. 87- 77 ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, and other applicable provisions oflaw, and Resolution No. 94-196, duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on September 20, 1994, as amended and supplemented, and particularly as supplemented by Resolution No. 01-34 adopted by the Board on January 9, 2001 (hereinafter colIectively calIed the "Resolution"), and is subject to alI the terms and conditions of said Resolution. Capitalized terms used herein shalI have the meaning specified in the Resolution. This Bond is payable from and secured solely by a lien upon and pledge (i) of the proceeds derived from assessments levied against the lands and real estate within the County to be specialIy benefitted by the Rouse Road MSBU Project authorized by the Rouse Road MSBU Assessment Resolutions, including interest and penalties on such assessments and any moneys received upon the foreclosure of the liens of such assessments or sales, if any, of tax deeds or tax certificates with respect to such assessments (the "Rouse Road MSBU Special Assessments"), (ii) certain Rouse Road Investment Earnings; and (iii) the moneys on deposit in the Rouse Road Subaccounts in the Funds and Accounts created pursuant to the Resolution, hereinafter defined (colIectively, the "Rouse Road Pledged Revenues''), all in the manner provided in and subject to the terms and conditions of such Resolution, This Bond does not constitute a general obligation or indebtedness of the County as a "bond" within the meaning of the State constitution, and it is expressly agreed by the Registered Owner of this Bond that such Registered Owner shalI never have the right to require or compel the A-2 6483V 1128902-00 l03/R-SERIES RESO ..... -...I exercise of the ad valorem taxing power of the County, or the taxation of any property of or in the County, for the payment ofthe principal of and interest on this Bond or for the making of any sinking fund, reserve or other payments provided for in the Resolution. It is further agreed between the County and the Registered Owner of this Bond, that this Bond and the obligation evidenced hereby shall not constitute a lien upon the Rouse Road MSBU Project or any part thereof, or on any other property of or in the County, but shall constitute a lien only on the Rouse Road Pledged Revenues, in the manner provided in the Resolution, The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered Bonds in the denominations or Maturity Amounts of$5,000 or integral multiples thereof. This Bond is transferable, and exchangeable for Bonds of other authorized denominations, at the office of the Bond Registrar, by the Registered Owner or by a person legally empowered to do so, upon presentation and surrender hereof to the Bond Registrar, together with a request for exchange or an assignment signed by the Registered Owner or by a person legally empowered to do so, in a form satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, all subject to the terms, limitations and conditions provided in the Resolution, No charge wiIl be made for transfer or exchange, but the County or the Bond Registrar may require payment of an amount sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection therewith. The County and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the Registered Owner as the absolute owner of this Bond for the purpose of receiving payment of or on account of principal or interest and for all other purposes, and neither the County nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. The County has entered into certain covenants with the Registered Owners of the Bonds of this Series for the terms of which reference is made to the Resolution, In particular, the County has reserved the right to defease the lien of the Bonds of this issue upon the Rouse Road Pledged Revenues upon making provision for payment of the Bonds as provided in the Resolution. Reference is made to the Resolution for a more complete description of the provisions, among others, with respect to the nature and extent of the security for the Bonds, the rights, duties and obligations ofthe County, the Registrar and the Registered Owners, and the terms and conditions upon which the Bonds are issued and secured. The Registered Owner of this Bond, by acceptance hereof, assents to all of the provisions of the Resolution. [INSERT REDEMPTION PROVISIONS] Notice of such redemption shall be given in the manner provided in the Resolution. A-3 6483V\l28902-00103/R·SERJES RESO ....... .-...J This Bond is and has all the qualities and incidents of a negotiable instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code-Investment Securities Laws ofthe State of Florida, and the Registered Owner and each successive Registered Owner of this Bond, shall be conclusively deemed by his acceptance hereofto have agreed that this Bond shall be and have all the qualities and incidents of negotiable instruments under the laws of the State of Florida. It is hereby certified and recited that all acts, conditions and things required to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond, exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form and time as required by the laws and Constitution of the State of Florida applicable thereto, and that the issuance of this Bond, and of the issue of Bonds of which this Bond is one, does not violate any constitutional or statutory limitation. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security t or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Registrar. A-4 6483VI/28902-00103/R-SERlES RESO '- ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, St. Lucie County, Florida has issued this Bond and has caused the same to be executed by its Chairman, either manually or with her facsimile signature, and the corporate seal of said County or a facsimile thereof to be affixed hereto or imprinted or reproduced hereon and attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the Clerk, all as of the Date of Issue above. (SEAL) ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Chairman, Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: By: Clerk of the Circuit Court, ex officio Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners REGISTRAR'S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds of the issue described in the within-mentioned Resolution. A-5 648JVI/28902-OOI03/R-SERJES RESO Date of Authentication: 6483V¡/28902.00103iR-SERJES RESO '- As Bond Registrar By Authorized Signature - A-6 . '-' ....,,¡ VALIDATION CERTIFICATE This Bond is one of a series of Bonds validated by judgment of the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County, Florida rendered on , 2001. Chairman , A-7 6483VI128902-00103/R·SERlES RESO '- -...I The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of the within Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common UNIF GIF MIN ACT _ TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties (Cust.) IT TEN - as joint tenants with right Custodian for of survivorship and not of tenants in common (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act . of Additional abbreviations may also be used although not listed above. (State) ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECENED, the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto _ (PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE] (Name and Address of Transferee) 648JVI/28902-0010J/R_SERlES RESO A-8 '-' ..., the within Note and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoints to transfer the within note on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises, Dated Signature Guaranteed Signature guarantee shall be made by a guarantor institution participating in the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program or in such other guarantee program acceptable to the Registrar. Note: The signature(s) on this assignment must correspond with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears upon the face of the within bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever. . A-9 6483Vlf28902-00103/R-SERlES RESO 01/05/01 FZABIIARR FUND 001 001001 001124 001127 001128 001130 001243 001252 001807 101 101001 101002 101003 101104 102 102001 103 105 107 107002 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 126 136 138 139 140 140001 160 183 183001 183004 183106 185001 185204 186 186204 . ~ LUCIE COUNrY - BOARD ;£ -' liARRANI' LIST il14- 30-DEC-2000 TO 05-JAN-20OI FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund Recreation Special Events FTA USC Section 5307 FY 99/00 National Endowment Humanities Section 112/MPO/FH\lA/Planning FY01 TC Community Action Agency FYOO/01 Childern's Environ. Learning Center Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant Floridian Aquifer lIell Monitoring Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option FHIlA/FDOT Hurricane Floyd reimburse Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Law Enforcement MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Pine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar River Park I Fund Ri ver Park II Fund Harmony Heights 3 Fund Harmony Heights 4 Fund Sheraton Plaza Fund Sunland Gardens Fund Sunrise Park Fund Paradise Park Fund Holiday Pines Fund The Grove Fund Blakely Subdivision Fund Indian River Estates Fund Queens Cove Lighting Distil13 Fund Southern Oak Estates Lighting Monte Carlo Lighting MSTUil4 Fund Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund Palm Grove Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Domestic Relations Hearing FYQO-03 SHIP Housing Assistance FY 00/01 FHFA SHIP 99/00 Recycling Operating Fund Recycling & Education Grant FYoo/01 EXPENSES 1,011 ,098.51 604.26 77 .24 135.00 2,544.58 417.09 126.00 396.44 92.37 55,029.86 2,911.16 972.00 68,733.72 15,000.00 27,706.90 8,942.15 5,626.56 2,340.01 262,024.72 5,813.37 2,674.71 539.26 208.80 472.12 450.85 510.27 126.87 722.60 740.19 157.19 2.92 879.57 258.60 113.94 1,351.96 109.90 693.59 6,524.75 61.61 2,067.74 1,685.28 853.91 819.04 6,158.52 1,424.37 10.00 1,031.18 343.74 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 270,132.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,915.08 796.56 0.00 1,188.80 1,188.80 93,302.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,709.16 3,761.15 0.00 2,117 .97 92,301. 37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,991.60 0.00 2,219.20 4,387.01 1,850.58 2,673.72 0.00 2,429.22 0.00 1,789.01 596.35 . '4 4 , ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD '-' 01/05/01 PAGE 2 FZABIIARR IIARRANT LIST #14- 30-DEC-20oo TO 05-JAN-2001 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 205 Beach Bond I&S Fund 5,103.04 0.00 242 Port I&S Fund 2,253.26 0.00 282 Environmental Land I&S Fund 8,421.34 0.00 301 So. County Regional Stadium 142,289.19 0.00 304 Communication System Fund 373.62 0.00 315 County Building Fund 1,292.44 0.00 316 County Capital 17,397.50 0.00 335 Becker Road Capital Fund 2,300.00 0.00 382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 47,869.37 0.00 390 Treasure Cove/Ocean Harbor S Cap 5,058.74 0.00 395 River Branch MSBU Capital 93.60 0.00 396 Lennard Road 1 - Roadway Capital 93.60 0.00 397 Lennard Road 2 - lIater Capital 93.60 0.00 398 Lennard Road 3 - Sewer Capital 95.68 0.00 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 107,226.69 34,445.32 418 Golf Course Fund 32,805.05 21,000.19 421 H.E.II. Utilities Fund 133.73 190.00 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 2,535.47 3,446.64 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 1,141.13 2,061.62 .. 461 Sports Complex Fund 10,769.82 7,547.02 471 Holiday Pines Utilities Fund 2,296.57 1,711.77 491 Building Code Fund 9,598.55 18,081.53 501 Information Technology Fund 128,199.17 70,153.95 505 Health Insurance Fund 7,943.82 3,034.75 505001 Property/Casualty Insurance Fund 759.45 1,626.22 510 Service Garage Fund 15,524.67 9,063.03 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 2,707.23 3,035.62 625 Law Library 5,540.00 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 2,061,501. 75 711,748.56 ....... -....I BOARD OF COUNlY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA JanuaIY 9.2001 REGULAR AGENDA PUBUC HEARINGS PUBLIC WORKS A.l Unsafe Building / 2014 South 35th Street, Fort Pierce, Florida - Consider staff recommendation, pursuant to the provisions of Article III of Chapter 2-5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, that the Board enter an order to repair or demolish the building located at 2014 South 35th Street, Fort Pierce, Florida by April 15, 2001. If the building is not repaired or demolished by April 15, 2001, the County shall demolish the Building and assess the entire cost against the real property where the Building is located. A.2 Unsafe Building / 1412 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, Florida - Consider staff recommendation, pursuant to the provisions of Article III of Chapter 2-5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, that the Board enter an order to repair or demolish the building located at 1412 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, Florida by April 15, 2001. If the building is not repaired or demolished by April 15, 2001, the County shall demolish the Building and assess the entire cost against the real property where the Building is located. End of Public Hearings CONSENT AGENDA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY A.3 Software Support and Maintenance Agreement Extension - Consider staff recommendation to extend the Software and Maintenance Agreement with Graphic Computer Solutions (GCS) for one (1) year and authorize payment to GCS. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings wil1 need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross~examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disabiJity requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462~1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. 12/27/00 ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...., PAGE 1 FZABI/ARR I/ARRANT LIST 112- 16-DEC-2000 TO 22-DEC-2000 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 001 General Fund 299,749.03 290,170.85 001124 FTA USC Section 5307 FY 99/00 27.36 363.69 001125 TC Community Action Agency FY 99/00 1.49 19.42 001128 Section 112/MPO/FHIIA/Planning FY01 529.54 5,662.42 001130 TC Community Action Agency FYoo/Ol 160.97 796.58 001252 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant 91.62 1,227.64 001807 Floridian Aquifer lIell Monitoring 95.34 1,227.64 101 Transportation Trust Fund 198,802.91 97,666.90 101002 Transportation Trust/80% Constitut 2,604.50 0.00 101003 Transportation Trust/Local Option 10,211.25 0.00 101006 Transportation Trust/Impact Fees 6,088.50 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 5,071. 72 45,516.25 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 727.26 3,875.85 102201 Archeological Survey (Div. of Histo 24,750.00 0.00 105 Library Special Grants Fund 6,071. 76 2,276.14 107 Fine & Forfeiture Fund 227,506.57 79,212.23 107002 Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar 90.14 0.00 121 Blakely Subdivision Fund 65.41 0.00 140 Port & Airport Fund 6,741.02 6,647.88 140001 Port Fund 26,577.04 0.00 140121 FAA Taxiway A-3, Airfield Signage 900.00 0.00 140312 (FOOT) Taxiway A-3 Phase I Const. 100.00 0.00 142 Port MSBU Development Fund 28,786.04 0.00 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 228.49 2,296.88 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 1,556.78 4,581.21 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 170.21 1,928.26 183004 Ct Admin.- Teen Court 305.51 2,751.41 183211 Civil Traffic Infraction officer st 880.00 0.00 185001 SHIP Housing Assistance FY 00/01 177.65 2,429.22 185203 FHFA-SHIP 98/99 2.97 38.84 185204 FHFA SHIP 99/00 1.48 19.42 186 Recycling Operating Fund 135.75 1,847.27 186204 Recycling & Education Grant FYOO/01 45.25 615.77 304 Communication System Fund 1,500.00 0.00 310002 Impact Fees-Parks 115,450.00 0.00 316 County Capital 47,698.75 0.00 316001 Transportation Capital 66,610.60 0.00 362 Sports Complex Improv Fund 42,132.00 0.00 382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 2,935.00 0.00 392 Ideal Holding Road MSBU Capital 17,987.54 0.00 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 80,926.58 31,984.30 401220 Litter Control & Prevention Fyoo/Ol 542.40 0.00 418 Golf Course Fund 14,502.10 21,446.30 421 H.E.II. Utilities Fund 4,390.15 198.49 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 66,513.47 3,607.43 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 65,769.91 2,129.71 461 Sports Complex Fund 9,167.68 8,144.00 471 Holiday Pines Utilities Fund 33,917.01 1,832.43 12/27/00 ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...., PAGE 2 FZABIIARR IIARRANT LIST #12- 16-DEC-2000 TO 22-DEC-2000 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 491 Building Code Fund 2,711.88 18,798.89 501 Informa tion Technology Fund 15,165.76 70,478.69 505 Health Insurance Fund 5,011. 76 10,271.28 505001 Property/Casualty Insurance Fund 123.56 1,665.06 510 Service Garage Fund 29,783.80 9,412.61 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 9,642.76 3,228.70 GRAND TOTAL: 1,481,736.27 734,369.66 12/27/00 FZABWARR ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...., VOID LISTg 12- 16-DEC-20oo TO 22-DEC-2000 FUND: 001130- TC Community Action Agency FYOOI01 CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00265104 12101435 Wilshire Credit Corp 500.00 00266257 12104818 Ft Pierce Utility Authority In 102. 90 FUND TOTAL: 602.90 PAGE 1 12/27/00 ~ LUCIE COUNl'Y - BOARD -...I FZABVARR VOID LIST# 12- 16-DEC-2oo0 TO 22-DEC-2000 FUND: 101 - Transportation Trust Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00266257 12105182 Ft Pierce Utility Authority In 00266323 12104567 Marriott 12104573 885.28 210.00 210.00 420.00 CHECK TOTAL: FUND TOTAL: 1,305.28 PAGE 2 .- 12127 /00 S~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD -...I FZABYARR VOID LISTf1 12- 16-DEC-2000 TO 22-DEC-2000 FUND: 102 - Unincorporated Services Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00266323 12104631 Marriott FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 178.00 178.00 PAGE 3 12/27 /00 ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD 'oJ FZABVARR VOID LISTU 12- 16-DEC-20OD TO 22-DEC-2000 FUND: 121 - Blakely Subdivision Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00266257 12104858 Ft Pierce Utility Authority In FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 65.41 65.41 PAGE 4 ·- 12/27/00 !1M' LUCIE COUNIT - BOARD -...I . . FZABIIARR VOID LIST1,I 12- 16-DEC-2000 TO 22-DEC-2000 FUND: 140001- Port Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00266257 12104593 Ft Pierce Utility Authority In FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 5.33 5.33 PAGE 5 12/29/00 S~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ..., PAGE 1 FZABIIARR IIARRANT LIST #13- 23-DEC-2000 TO 29-DEC-2000 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 001 General Fund 55,890.36 0.00 001130 TC Community Action Agency FYOO/01 1,700.00 0.00 101 Transportation Trust Fund 11,862.61 0.00 101002 Transportation Trust/80% Constitut 7,649.58 0.00 101006 Transportation Trust/Impact Fees 1,850.00 0.00 101211 FDEP Canal & Stormwater Retrofit 290.00 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 246.59 0.00 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 6.00 0.00 105 Library Special Grants Fund 106 . 38 0.00 · 107 Fine & Forfeiture Fund 2,765,334.76 0.00 140 Port & Airport Fund 264.14 0.00 145813 IRL SI/IM Impound Rest IX 36,900.00 0.00 « 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 21.00 0.00 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 241.56 0.00 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 1.50 0.00 ~ 186 Recycling Operating Fund 2.50 0.00 304 Communication System Fund 2,143,582.60 0.00 316 Coun ty Capital 7,120.00 0.00 316001 Transportation Capital 1,270.00 0.00 · 362 Sports Complex Improv Fund 14,862.00 0.00 392 Ideal Holding Road MSBU Capital 5,599.42 0.00 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 876,183.24 0.00 . 418 Golf Course Fund 244.84 0.00 421 H.E.II. Utilities Fund 458.24 0.00 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 12,649.12 0.00 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 21,432.31 0.00 <III 461 Sports Complex Fund 514.72 0.00 471 Holiday Pines Utilities Fund 6,341.35 0.00 · 491 Building Code Fund 156.69 0.00 501 Information Technology Fund 13,852.66 0.00 505 Health Insurance Fund 105.58 0.00 505001 Property/Casualty Insurance Fund 510.00 0.00 510 Service Garage Fund 20,488.87 0.00 606 Shared Pool Cash-Property Appraiser 75,000.00 0.00 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 23.37 0.00 625 Law Li brary 3,177 .22 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 6,085,939.21 0.00 '-' AGENDA REQUEST (!, ,17 ITE~O. t1 - ..J DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Dennis Wetzel Information Technology Director SUBJECT: Graphic Computer Solutions (GCS) Extension of Software Support and Maintenance Agreement BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in 501-9000-534110-800. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMEND A TION: Staff recommends that the Board extend the Software and Maintenance * Agreement with GCS for one (1) year as indicated above and authorize payment to GCS. * (October 1, 2000 - September 30, 2001) COMMISSION ACTION: [~ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County AttorneY~~;Z ~~....'" Mana~ement & BUdget~ Or~gJ.natJ.ngDept._~__~_ PublJ.c Works DJ.r: Flnance: (Check for ~nlY' 1£ pplJ.cableJ ~~4-~e~ -- Purchasing: County Eng.: Eff. 5/96 '-' ....., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dennis Wetzel, Information Technology Director DATE: January 4,2001 SUBJECT: Graphic Computer Solutions (GCS) Extension of Software Support and Maintenance Agreement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: In 1999, the clerk of the Circuit Court entered into a Software Support and Maintenance Agreement with Graphic Computer Solutions, Inc. (GCS) to perform support maintenance on the Clerk's Judicial/Dialog system. The term of the initial agreement was from October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2000 with an option to renew annually. This Agreement was later transferred to the County and additional systems were installed per the Clerk's requirements. The total annual cost of the Agreement is $172,375.00, broken down as follows: Original System - $93,400 (October 1, 2000 - September 30, 2001) Additional System- $78,975 (January 15, 2001 - January 14, 2002) Continued maintenance and support of these systems is essential for the Clerk's operation. Funds are available in Account No. 501-9000-534110-800 to make these payments. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board extend the Software and Maintenance Agreement with GCS for one (1) year as indicated above and authorize payment to GCS. Respectfully submitted, a..., (4f= Dennis Wetzel Information Technology Director DW/ í œ W--1-UI-OQ( 'Iiw' -...I FIRST ADDENDUM TO MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT This First Addendum is entered into subject to the terms and conditions of the Maintenance Agreement described in Appendix A of the contract between St. Lucie CountYAand Graphic Computer Solutions, Inc. dated January 5'h, 1999 and covers the additional systems and services required for maintenance of the installed systems. Clerk of Court " Current Systems Maintenance Implementation of the Judicial/Dialog System Services covered under the initial contract for maintenance beginning 90 days after final implementation on June 30, 1999 are described in the original maintenance agreement attached to the January 5th contract as Appendix A. This Agreement covers the following installed application systems and includes telephone support and all software updates at no charge. The effective start date for these services is October 1, 1999. The price for this maintenance as stated in the Agreement is $93,400 for one year. See attached annual maintenance schedule. 1. Feiony/Dialog Case Management 2. Juvenile/Dialog Case Management 3. Misdemeanor/Dialog Case Management 4. Traffic/Dialog Case Management Additional Systems reauirina Maintenance The foliowing additional systems were installed due to the requirements for the operations of the Clerk's Office: 1. Interface/Dialog Web Appiicatlon 2. Misceiianeous Financial Transactions (MFT) 3. Traffic Financial Systems (TVS) The standard maintenance price for these systems covers the regular telephone support and software updates as described in the Appendix A of the contract and amounts to $78,975. Since these systems were completed in September, 1999, the maintenance period is from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000 and the effective start date for this maintenance is January 1, 2000. The total standard maintenance as described in the original maintenance agreement is then: Original systems Additional systems $ 93,400 due January 15, 2000 $ 78.975 due January 15, 2000 Total Standard Maintenance $172,375 9 :\atty\agreemnt\contract\Graphlc Computer lA -1- '-' -...I Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements set forth herein, each party for itself and its successors and assigns, does agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Addendum Agreement. c2.ST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCI COUNTY BY: Date AND BY: GRAPHIC COMPUTER SOLUTIONS, INC. J):f-hf~ Herbert B. Graham, Chairman BY: WITNESSES: Date: I/;2- ) z,C/OtJ WITNESSES : CLERK OF CIR=T a::uRI' =O;¡:~~/~fL/ fute: ..2 ;;"'.3.,1:) ~'--nH ~~""'A of'. '.', :.¡ .' \.;....."'," - ",...." ,.:". . . '- L F .- , ,. .~ $(5~' :,\;}, . u _.,.~:\:- ~ ct: r.·~ ¡ ~..\ ¡/.,..; '. ~,/:~: 1"1 ....1. - "'"-~ '.' ..' 'q' ~~ (~i,~v~::=:\~"5'~> g:\atty\agreemnt\contract\Graphic Computer lA -2- "'" AGENDA REQUEST ...., ITEM NO. C2 11 DATE: January 9,2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] SUBMITTED BY: PUBliC WORKS DEPT-ROAD & BRIDGE DIV ct:~/ P. M. Bowers, Manager Road & Bridge Division TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Bid waiver and purchase from quotation for a Hot Patch truck. BACKGROUND: Section 5.5 (a) (5) of the St. Lucie County Purchasing manual provides for the purchase from quotations if the quotation is less than State Contract. Atlantic Ford is the State Contract vendor. Palm Beach International submitted no bid. Freightliner provides local service and was the low bidder. Attached is a list of options that are needed to make the Hot Patch truck a safe and efficient piece of equipment. The price of $87,316.74 exceeds the budget of $85,000,00, The difference ($2,316.74) is available from savings on previously purchased equipment without increasing the Drainage Budget. FUNDS AVAILABLE: 101-4108-564000-400 - Machinery & Equipment PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of bid waiver, and the purchase of the Hot Patch truck from Freightliner of South Florida in the amount of $87,316.74. [x] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED o las M. Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: ",__ l'~~ [X]Originating Dept. Public Works LA / / Finance (check for copy oniy, if applicable)--2L. Cnnrdination/Sinnatures [X]Mgt. & Budget ~ [ ICo. Eng [X]Purchasing ')j6 [ ]Road & Bridge ~ BID TABULATION -...I 12/14/00 Road & Bridge Division HOTPATCH TRUCK EQ01-146 *** . Vendors: Palm Bch Intern'l Atlantic Ford Freightliner Base Vehicle with Hot Patch unit No Bid $73,978.00 $73,471.74 Options for Hot Patch unit: ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 Spoils Bin $1,295.00 $1,295.00 2 Vibraiory Compactor Plate $1,895_00 $1,895.00 5 Hydraulic Rear Lift Platform $1,495.00 $1,495.00 7 DOT Directional Arrow Board $1,200.00 $1,200.00 8 Strobe Light $225,00 $225.00 9 Pavement Breaker Hammer $1 ,895.00 $1,895,00 13 Diesei Fuel Hose Reel $255.00 $255.00 15 Hydraulic Operated Sieel Top Doors $2,495.00 $2,495.00 16 Water Tank $250.00 $250,00 17 Drip Pan $250,00 $250.00 18 Frame Mounted LP Gas Bottle $695,00 $695,00 20 Hydraulic Tool Line Hose Reel $695.00 $695.00 24 PTO Electric Over Air Shift $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Options total: $0,00 $13,845,00 $13,845,00 TOTAL: $0.00 $87,823.00 $87,316.74 Budgeted Amount: $85,000.00 $85,000.00 Net Over/Under ($2,823.00) ($2,316.74) *** Atlantic Ford (State Contract) , --..~ ~~---- ""'" -...I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C" 2B DATE: January 9,2001 SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS DEPT REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: Cy (~~1.~~ ~~ Public Works Director TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Award of Bid # 00-096, Administration Building Annex Parking Lot Drainage Improvements. BACKGROUND: On October 4, 2000 bids were opened for the drainage improvements to the Administration Building Annex Parking Lot. Sixteen sets of bid documents were distributed and two bids were received, The low bidder is Johnson-Davis, Inc, in the amount of $103,040.00. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 316-4115-563000-15005 County Capital Fund in the amount of $59,160.00 which is an "Investment for the Future" fund and Fund No. 101003-4113-563000- 15005 Transportation Trust I Local Option in the amount of $ 59,240.00 which is a Capital Improvements Project fund. PREVIOUS ACTION: On July 26, 2000 bids for the drainage improvements were collected. Only one bidder submitted a bid for the project. Additionally, the submitted bid was incomplete. The bid was rejected and the contract documents were revised and subsequently advertised again. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid #00-096, Administration Building Annex Parking Lot Drainage Improvements, to the low bidder Johnson-Davis, Inc. in the amount of$103,040.00, establish the project budget as outlined in the attached memorandum and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [J OTHER Pulled for future vote ou as Anderson Engineering W~· 1 research C nty Administrator additional op . n . . [x] County Attorney ~x] Mgt. & BUdget~ 1TJrfJfq (x] Purchasing cB [x] Originating 7~ri<S T A./ [x] Project. Man. tJ,l/H (x] Budget & Rev, Coor. ~...r\ [x] Finance ' (Check for cd'py only, if applicable) Charles L. Bicht, Sr. - Purchasing Manager Ray Wazny, P.E. - Public Works Director ~ Barbara Meinhardt - Budget and Revenue Coordinator 6i\\1 Craig Hauschild, P.E. - Senior Project Engineer tAH January 2, 2001 Award of Administration Building Annex Parking Lot Drainage Improvements (Bid # 00-096). To: Via: Via: From: Date: Subject: '-' -...I DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 00-388 ;:~i:~~:~~~~~~r~~ti~ir~::~:;~::~::,.:n:~~;~~;~~~~n::~::~:;~:~~:;~:~~:~~::~::~.~~.~i.~~.:r¡:ij~rH@i~j~iU~~~:iL:i~:i~~r~:~~:iU:¡~~¡~~j~~~~~j~~r~:;¡:;:;ii:i~;~~;i~;i~;i~;~i:¡i;i;:i~)~~~~~~~~~~~t~n~}{~~j~~~~1~: The engineering department has designed plans to reduce the ponding of water in the Administration Building Annex Parking Lot area. The request for bids was published on June 30, 2000. On July 26, 2000 bids for the drainage improvements were collected, Only one bidder submitted for this project. However, the submitted bid was incomplete and exceeded the project budget. We utilized value engineering techniques to identify tasks that were considered either labor- intensive and I or expensive. The results were reviewed and, where possible, incorporated into the new plans, The redesigned construction plans now treat the first inch of runoffl collected in the parking lot area before discharging into the existing stormwater system. The redesigned plans are more compatible with any future improvements that may be desired. The second request for bids was published on September 8,2000. On October 4,2000 bids for this project were opened. We have reviewed the two (2) bids received, The bids were checked using the unit prices that were provided. Based on our review of the bids, we recommend award of the contract to the low bidder, Johnson-Davis, Inc" in the amount of $103,040. The following budget is established for the project: Construction: Testing: Reserves: TOTAL: $103,040.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 10.360.00 $ 118,400.00 Funds will be made available in Fund No, 101003-4113-563000-15005 Transportation Trust I Local Option in the amount of $59,240,00 and in Fund No. 316-4115-563000-15005 County Capital Fund in the amount of $59, 160.00. attachments: Bid Tabulation Sheet Bid Summary Spreadsheet cc w/attachments: Don West, P.E. - County Engineer Michael Powley, P.E. - Capital Projects Engineer I- W >-w I-J: zen :)z 00 ()- wI- _<C ()...J :):) -100 .<C ~I- :n o - 00 -- '-' . () z - ~ en - > <C N 0 0 =It . I 0::: Z 0 . 0 0 0 en- ~ 0 Z~ 0 Z ~ J:¡5 M W 02 0 > ..,â T"" ~ 0 Z :) OU o:::Z C)- 0::: Z ~ wO 0- T"" Zl- =It :)() CD 0::: :) 0 Zo:::jjj' . 0 It) o I- ~ CD 0 I- en !!:! 0 Z ~ 0::: Z :: T"" w <C 00:: T"" > OO()g T"" ~ 0 - .. 001- ...JZ <C:) 1-0 o:!: I-<C I- Z w :!: w > o 0::: a.. :!: w C) <C Z - <C 0::: o I- o ...J C) :!: Z <C 52 g 0::: .. o <CC)T"" a.. Z ¡Q\ C)_\1::!I ZO:::O _wo CWO ...JZN 5(5-=i mzo::: zWw oc.hm -~o 1-0:::1- CD<COO 0)0:::>0 01-> o~Oo oz_w =It-...JZ o:!:mw _0:)0.. oo<co..O '1 'WI' ~._- C:=~ ~'r-;l ~ : ! ~ i a: 'c= It) ,w i 'w ¡~-' I '2 @, ~ Ie¡ '[~L~~ r-;:::- ...-=:::1 -. .:=--_-=::: :::: :::: :::::: N ... :; .... ('tr, .. . c W I- :::I III . ii: c I- W (/) ¡¡: 2i ¡:: I!! . 0 c z z w :3 w > :;¡ iii Z :::I U ~ U w E 0 II: C 0 :;¡ (/) .. 0 c c .;: u ãi ãi ~ II. II. II. " 0 0 0 c: II: II: II: '" W W w E III III III .. " :;¡ :;¡ :;¡ .. :::I :::I :::I .. Z Z Z . -'" , 'W ~ ° <õ ° '" 0 0 0 0 8 ° 8 ° 8 0 8 ° 0 0 CD 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <:> .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; g .; .; .; .; ,.¡ " 0 '" 0 r- '" 0 ;!; 0 '" 0 0 r- ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ '" N ~ "'- r- '" '" ~ '" '" q '" '" '" .... CD u Ñ .; '" ..¡ ..¡ <ñ ,.: Ñ ,.: <ñ .. .. '" '" Ñ <:>. 'C ~ ~ ;;; .. '" N '" N .. .. .. .. .. .. t- o. '" '" ;;; .... '" .... C .... . e ... ~ 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 ° 0 0 0 0 III " <õ '" 0 ° r- q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - C .; .; .; .; ,.: N .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; c: ::¡ ~ " 0 '" 0 ~ ;;; N '" '" r- N ;1 '" 0 0 0 0 0 ° ë u '" N ~ .. .. .. "! ~ .. .. ~ O. '" '" "' "'- Q) c 'C ~ ::¡ 0. Ñ .; .. ~ ;;; .. ~ .. .. Ñ ~ E .. .. '" .. .. .. " Q) '" > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 8 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 <:> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <:> .... .; .; .; .; .; .; .; g .; .; .; .; .; .; .; g .; .; ó 0 0 0 ¡;¡ '" 0 '" 0 0 0 '" '" '" '" 0 0 s " 0, 0 0 "'. r- ... 0 0 N 0 '" .. N N "'. 0 '" '<t .!! ;;; <Ó M <ñ ~ ..¡ Ô <Ó Ñ 'f- ô .. .. .. ;;; Ñ .. <:> 0 11. .. .. .. .. N N .. .. ~ .. ...; t- .. .. .. .. <:> .... ... nJ . c: ;; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 ° 8 ° 0 0 ° 2! ° 0 0 0 q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nJ C ~ " .; .; .; .; ;;; ,.: ..; .; .; .; .; .; g .; .; .; g .; .!! ° 0 0 .. N '" 0 0 '" '" N '" '" 0 0 .... 0 ë q 0 0 .. .. q q .. .. '" .. N N "'. ° '" C . ::¡ 11. ;;; <Ó M ;;; ;;; '" .. ;;; Ñ .. c .. .. .. = - 0 0 .., ...J CI c: :.¡¡;: .... nJ D.. CI c: "C ::::I DJ c: 0 :¡:: f! - .!!! c: E "C « '-' AGENDA REQUEST ...., ITEM NO. C-3-A DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING PRESENTED BY: CHARLES BICHT SUBJECT: Permission to advertise for bids for the sale of the Yale EW Electric Overhead 10-ton Hoist. BACKGROUND: See attached FUNDS AVAil.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request for permission the advertise for bids for the sale of the Yale EW Electric Overhead 10-ton Hoist. COMMISSION ACTION: NCE: [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney:(X) OrtginaUng Dept Finance: (Check for Copy only. if Appiicable) 3}... Coordination/Sianatures Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) Other: æ Other. Eff.1197 G:\COMMON\AGENDAS\OTHER\per adv Hoist.wpd ~ ..." '" -' """'" ...., ;: \: ',¡: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SOLID WASTE DIVISION MEMORANDUM 00-205 t ,. b. ..... __.~~w., ...)'!ti::<<<<"''''''>:N,.W.".,.,.:~.y'y",.,.·*:<.,.,.,.",<.,.;o;.:<<""""",,:·}'''''·''''·X>':'''''ò)t""ft·:""·r:~t"'«·X>>>r.ií>>""·""''''i(îl·''''·-<'''X''''''''''''1Íi'''''''''''''''''''>>>:'''';'¡rm,,,,.,.,.,.,.>:>w.<oX.>,,,,,,,,,,.:,:""'¡:r¡«ö>·' ,., I . DATE: Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Director Leo J. Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager ~ December 18, 2000 . TO: FROM: ~ RE: Sale of Overhead Hoist Please take the necessary steps to advertise for bids for the sale of the Yale EW Electric Overhead 10-ton Hoist. Below, you will find the information pertinent to this piece of equipment: ; All interested parties may view this piece of equipment at the Glades Road Landfill. Yale Overhead Electric Hoist Model No. CEW10X22RT14S4 Serial No. W316089A Yale No. W316089 Please add the following vendor to the list of potential bidders: Advanced Overhead Systems, Inc. 3510 Craftsman Boulevard PO Box 5498 Lakeland, FL., 33807-5498 If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at extension 1631. c: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director ~(¡.~ ~ IV U ·1 (JJ J)// ), /I!· ¡y ,.6 I'" o (¡ Thank you. LJC/am , '- AGENDA REQUEST -' ITEM NO. C-3-B DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING SUBJECT: Award bid #01-006 Enhanced Swale Maintenance CHARLES BICHT BACKGROUND: On November 15, 2000 bid were opened for the Enhanced Swale Maintenance. Three hundred thirty nine vendors were notified, seventeen sets of bid documents were distributed and three bids were received. The low bidder is CEM Enterprises, Inc. DBA Sunshine Painting in the amount of $6.77 per foot and $2.00 per foot for culvert cleaning. FUNDS AVAIL.: 1 02001-3725-534000-300 Swale Maintenance PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid #01-006 Enhanced Swale Maintenance to the low bidder CEM Enterprises, Inc. DBA Sunshine Painting in the amount of $6.77 per foot and $2.00 per foot for culvert cleaning and authorize the chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: NCE: Ix] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: u Anderson o nty Administrator "'Íi ·l~ County Attomey:(X) V Coordination/Sianatures Mgt. & BUdget:(X~ ,~llv(D Originating Dept Other: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) Other: cß Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)_XX_ Eff.1/97 G:\COMMON\AGENDAS\SIDS\20Dl-005 award.wpd I U) a: w z QI- U)w ~u)w -:z: z:IEU) ::J:lEz 000 00- w>1- . _I-<C :IE oz-l ::J::J::J . < .Jom 0 . 0 < 0 I- I- .. u)LLe - 0- - Om w @ 0 a: z 0 < <C 0 0 Z 0 N m w ft l- ll) Z - - a:: <C :E w m w :IE -I W ~U» U)~O a:z co CO 0 w;t.. 0 I °oe - 0 z_w =It <C-IZ e :z:mw - z::Ja.. m wa..o ~ '"'" -...I (,!) z - z < . · W l- I- -I LL LL 0 - - 0 co I- 0 co a:: · . = N W .,.. .,.. > -I ::J 0 0 0 C! Q W · 0 0 0 0 0 Z N = ft ft < co N ~~ Z 0 CO) W "III" U') -- .,.. .,.. U)a:: I- z::J z II II 00 - < a..w :IE t-= t-= U)U) W LL LL we -I - - a:_ ~ ..... co zm ..... co . · 00 co = U) .,.. .,.. zz w C) 0 ·z ~ 0- oð zl- W _z I- . U) - ft< zO a: ffia.. wZ 0 u)w :IE-:' I- -z 1-1- 0 a:_ U)Z a..:z: ww ~ en a:U) >:IE Wz I- a::: I-::J z a.. ii w 0 ffi U) ii - O.è -I ..J Z -I ¡¡¡ LI. C < wÆ -I oj Z :IE<-= z> c 5> !:! .. W wmc. o w ~ w ~ > o 0 ~ <C e.!J m ,.; LI. i '" ... '" '" ~ '" .. c w ... ;:) Ie b æ ... w rn ¡¡: ë ¡:: f!! ë 0 z z w rn w > ::. w ::. ii:i 0 Z ;:) c.J c.J c.J w rr: ~ 0 II:: ~ ::. c rn 0 c c rn ~ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ c c.J z ~ LI. LI. LI. <C .. 0 0 0 :õ :! Q II:: II:: II:: w ¡¡; w w w c ~ Ie Ie Ie II:: w :õ :õ :: w ~ ;:) ;:) ;:) Q. Z Z Z . Ü 12/14/00 16:~2 F_~ S314622J33 I4i 01 '-' ....., PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Charlie Bieht, Purchasing Manager P. M. Bowers, Road & Bridge Manager II? Ray Murankus, Drainage Maintenance Supervisor Enhanced Swale Maintenance November 28. 2000 After reviewing the bid prices for the Enhanced Swals Maintenance (Bid #Q1-008) [ would recommend that we accept the low bid as submitted (copy attached) and award the contract to C.E.M. Enterprises d.b.a. Sunshine Painting. The bid received is as follows: $6.77 per lineal foot of excavated and restored swale area $2.00 per lineal foot to clean out culverts Not to Exceed $458.000.00 While we estimated approximately 60.000 Jineal feet of road side swales would be addressed this fiscal year. we do not guaranty any footage amount for either the Swale Maintenance or the Culvert Cleaning In this contract. If there you have any questions or need additional infonnation please contact me at 462-2511. RTM/Sb cc: Ray Wazny. Public Works Director J. Scott Herring, Asst. Road & Bridge Manager Dewey Hudman. Project Supervisor ...........-- .... S 3 "".... - 3oc:> b'1..~ol- "7'Z.~ - ~A-l ~ ,?>cn) fe,t~.oo v Pre.. c..\ :tl: · !Çl1arh~s Bicl1t - Swale lIA,!in!enance Page 1 . '-' ....,; From: To: Date: Subject: Raymond Murankus Charles Bicht Fri, Dec 29, 2000 9:21 AM Swale Maintenance Per our conversation yesterday, we recommend accepting the iow bid for the Swale Maintenance (CEM Enterprise) at $6,77 per lineal foot and $2,00 per lineal foot to clean culverts. The account number for this is 102001-3725534000-300. Currently there is $397,615,00 available in this account. If possible we would like this to go to the Board on January 9, 2001. Thank you for your help in this matter. If I can be of any assistance please contact me at 2511. cc: Mike Bowers; Scott Herring '-' AGENDA REQUEST ...., ITEM NO. C-3-C DATE: January 9,2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING SUBJECT: award bid #00-061 - Rouse Road Reconstruction CHARLES BICHT BACKGROUND: On July 19, 2000 bids were opened for the reconstruction of Rouse Road. One hundred forty eight vendors were notified, twelve sets of bid documents were distributed and four bids were received. The low bidder is Sheltra & Sons in the amount of $51 ,380.00 (Alternate bid amount). FUNDS AVAIL.: award is subject to availability of funding through the MSBU Line of Credit PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of bid #00-061 Rouse Road Reconstruction to the low bidder in the amount of $51 ,380.00 (alternate bid amount) and authorize the chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: CE: [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: u Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: (X) /f-q/ Originating Dept: Other: Purchasing Mgr.:(X)~ Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only. if Appiicable)_XX_ Eff.1/97 G:\COMMON\AGENDAS\BIDS\2000-061 award.wpd I- W ~~ ZUJ ::)Z 00 0- I- W<c -..J 0::) ::) ar ~<C 1-1- UJc - m """ . :::E . z <C o '1\ 0 --0 I- Z .. 0__ :JO::- O::WC§) I-W Cl)zo z-o 0"0 ZN OWen wëñ_ o::~> cO::...J _<C0:J c.ø0:::::.-, 90::>0 Ow Ow oCl):Jz ;I::Jmw cO:J~ mtt::c..o -' L.. ...., ¡..: UJ- a: ZW 00 0 0 off¡ CQ 0 !;E;¡t œ 0 a:- 0 Wa.. ..... W CD CQ :::- C)I- an ~ za: ... C'? ~~ :? t; a: ::. 0 LL 0 !;Eg >z ... 0 N ~ oz~ CQ cD W :t:~1- ~ 0 :::- I-:¡¡UJ ... Q) -ow CD ~ :Eo 3: :;: ~ . UJ _ W I-I-w a: iiSiiio 0 g 0 UJ:¡¡a: 0 QN ~a..!!! co; 0 z'll: o a.. ~ M W W-'I- ... 0 :::- zWa: CD ..... 0 z¡¡jo N 0 an IiIQ!: ~ ;- cö ~ 0 ::. ,þ z LL CQ ... 0 Z tit a: UJ ~ b W 0 o an 01Xl Q.... ~ co; OQ z'll: I- 0-' .z ... W I- <C ... CQ;:) :::- -' is . CQ MO ~ W CIQ .... :t: Z ;¡ ~ UJ :::- . ¡..: I- Z z :E ;:) <C 0 Q :E ãi <C Q I- -' ãi <C ~lrll) æo=> oQ~ zz<t -w~ :;:>11) :t: UJ Z o ¡::: is Q <C 2: a: ~ a: W . -. , ::; ~ ~ z :::: :::: :::: co '" .... .... - - .:' Q W ¡¡: ¡:: o z II) w Z <t Q. :;: o \J .... ° Ir W m :;: => z .:' Q W ~ => m æ ~ II) 2i ~ z w :;: => \J o Q C ii! .... ° Ir W m :;: => z .:' Q !S! iij u WE Ir 0 /lq Q~ - co m-;¡; ....." 0" co irE w., m." :;: ~ => ., Zp" '- -...I \~ -' ,<- ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM 00-430 TO: FROM: Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager Becky Padrick, MSBU Coordinator~:) I I DATE: December 27, 2000 SUBJECT: Bid No. 00-061 - Rouse Road Reconstruction Please proceed with awarding the "Alternative Base Bid" in the amount of $51,380.00 to Sheltra & Son Construction Company. The bid will need to be awarded "subject to availability of funding through the MSBU Line of Credif'. The bid will need to be awarded on or before January 9, 2001 to avoid expiration. Please let me know if you need anything further. BPI cc: Ray Wazny, P.E., Public Works Director Donald B. West, P.E., County Engineer Michael Powley, P.E., Capital Projects Engineer g:\wp\msbuprojects\rouse\awardbid-memo \ I.. '-' ...., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-4 DATE: January 9,2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Utilities Department William R. Blazak J SUBJECT: Permission to advertise for a Public Hearing for the transfer of Beach Club Colony Wastewater System to St. Lucie County, from Martin County, consistent with the requirements of Chapter 125.3401, Florida Statutes. FUNDS AVAIL: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: BOCC approved expenditure of funds in the amount of $136,545.00 on July 27,1999. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the advertisement of a Public hearing, consistent with Florida Statute Chapter 125.3401,and schedule the Public Hearing for the regular Board of County Commissioners meeting on February 13, 2001 at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. COMMISSION ACTION: Coordination/Sianatures E: X] APPROVED ] OTHER: DENIED County Attorney:X Mgt. & Budget: "1(1, I Originating Dept: X U.i ' Other: Finance Director: (Check f01jCopy only, If appllcable) Purchasing Other: Eff. 5/96 ""'" "'-' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WilLIAM ßLAZAK DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM FROM: Board of County Commissioners -il'þ William Blazak, Utility Director \.\~' ! TO: DATE: January 9, 2001 RE: Beach Club Colony - Public Hearing BACKGROUND: The Beach Club Colony wastewater system is located in St. Lucie County but is served on a retail basis by Martin County for water and wastewater service. The system consists of 104 customers consisting of primarily single family residential customers and a few commercial customers. Florida Statute, Chapter 125.3401, requires that any potential transaction that results in the transfer of utility ownership from one entity to another is required to schedule and hold a public hearing to determine if it is in the best interest of the parties involved. This public hearing will demonstrate that the transfer is in the best interest of the public. The customers of Beach Club Colony are participants in the South Hutchinson Island Municipal Service Benefit Unit and will recognize a significant reduction in the cost of wastewater disposal. This transaction will allow for the customers to be regulated by the County for which the service territory is located and further benefit from the system of which they are participants. The Public Hearing will be scheduled for February 13, 2001 and the Utility Staff and Consultants will be present to answer any questions from the Public. Martin County Board of County Commissioners held a Public Hearing on December 14, 2000, consistent with Florida Statutes, regarding the sale and transfer of Beach Club Colony to St. Lucie County, and approved the transfer unanimously with no public comment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the advertisement for a Public Hearing, consistent with Florida Statute Chapter 125.3401, and schedule the Public Hearing for the Board of County Commissioners scheduled meeting February 13,2001 at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. JOHN D. ß[1,UHN, District No.1. DOUG COWARD. District No.2· PAUlA A. LEWIS, Disrrlct No. J . mANNIE HUTCHINSON. District No.4. CUFF DAP.NE5. District No.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue . Fort Pierce. Fl34982 . Phone (561) 462-1150 . FAX (561) 462-1153 """ '-' PUBLIC BRIEFING DOCUMENT CHAPTER 125.3401, FLORIDA STATUTES PURCHASE AND SALE OF THE BEACH CLUB COLONY WASTEWATER FACILITIES THE COUNTIES OF ST. LUCIE AND MARTIN, FLORIDA February 13,2001 '-" -...I PUBLIC BRIEFING DOCUMENT CHAPTER 125.3401 FLORIDA STATUTES ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BEACH CLUB COLONY WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA TABLE OF CONTENTS Section ~ Title Page 1.0 BACKGROUND I-I 0.01 System Background I-I 0.02 125.3401 Statement 1-2 2.0 INCOME AND EXPENSE STATEMENTS 2-1 3.0 BALANCE SHEETS 3-1 4.0 STATEMENT OF EXISTING RATE BASE 4-1 5.0 PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE UTILITY FACILITIES 5-1 6.0 REASONABLENESS OF PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS 6-1 7.0 IMPACTS OF PURCHASE 7-1 8.0 ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT REQUIRED 8-1 9.0 AL TERNA TIVES TO THE PURCHASE 9-1 10.0 STATEMENT OF QUALITY SERVICE 10-1 11.0 STATEMENT OF PUBLIC INTEREST 11-1 APPENDIX A - Purchase and Sale Agreement APPENDIX B - Letter Report of Howard Osterman, Inc., Utility Consultant for St. Lucie County Utilities '-' ...., PUBLIC BRIEFING DOCUMENT CHAPTER 125.3401 FLORIDA STATUTES ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BEACH CLUB COLONY WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ~ Title Table 2-1 Beach Club Colony Billed Wastewater Revenue Summary - Fiscal Year 2000 Table 3-1 Net Replacement Cost Estimate of Beach Club Colony Wastewater Facilities Table 1 I-I Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Fiscal Year ended September 30, 1999 11 '-' """ SECTION 1 BACKGROUND '-' ...", SECTION 1 BACKGROUND 1.1 System Background The location of the service area for the Beach Club Colony (BCe) wastewater system (the "system") is located in St. Lucie County but is served on a retail basis by Martin County. Figure I-I illustrates the location of the System and St. Lucie and Martin Counties. The System presently consists of approximately 104 customers consisting primarily of a single-family residential accounts. The rates for service are established and regulated by Martin County although the customers are located outside the physical boundary of the County. Currently there is no interlocal agreement between the two parties for the provision of wastewater service by Martin County. St. Lucie County has adequate wastewater capacity to service the System and currently assesses customers within BCC for wastewater treatment and effluent disposal plant capacity allocable to the development. This transaction would allow for the System to be regulated by the county for which the service territory is located and has been designed as a "revenue neutral" transaction and would not compromise the ability to meet the rate covenant requirements of the Bond Resolution adopted by Martin County which authorized the issue of the outstanding utility revenue bonds. 1.2 Requirements of Chapter 125.3401, Florida Statutes Any potential utility transaction that results in the transfer of utility ownership from one entity to another is governed by Section 125.3401 of the Florida Statutes that state: 125.3401 Purchase, sale, or privatization of water, sewer, or wastewater reuse utility by county. No county may purchase or sell a water, sewer, or wastewater reuse utility that provides service to the public for compensation, or enter into a wastewater facility privatization contract for a wastewater facility, until the governing body of the county has held a public hearing on the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is in the public interest. In determining if the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is in the public interest, the county shall consider, at a minimum, the following: (I) The most recent available income and expense statement for the utility; (2) The most recent available balance sheet for the utility, listing assets and the liabilities and clearly showing the amount of contributions-in-aid-of-construction and the accumulated depreciation thereon; I-I '-' -' (3) A statement of existing rate base of the utility for regulatory purposes; (4) The physical condition of the utility facilities being purchased, sold, or subject to a wastewater facility privation contract; (5) The reasonableness of the purchase, sales, or wastewater facility privatization contract price and terms; (6) The impacts of the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract on utility customers, both positive and negative; (7) (a) Any additional investment required and the ability and willingness of the purchaser, or the private firm under a wastewater facility privatization contract, to make that investment, whether the purchaser is the county or the entity purchasing the utility from the county; (b) In the case of a wastewater facility privatization contract, the terms and conditions on which the private firm will provide capital investment and financing or a combination thereof for contemplated capital replacements, additions, expansions, and repairs. The county shall give significant weight to these criteria. (8) The alternatives to the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract, and the potential impact on utility customers if the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is not made; and (9) (a) The ability of the purchaser or the private firm under a wastewater facility privatization contract to provide and maintain high-quality and cost-effective utility service, whether the purchaser is the county or the entity purchasing the utility from the county. (b) in the case of a wastewater facility privatization contract, the county shall give significant weight to the technical expertise and experience of the private firm in carrying out the obligations specified in the wastewater facility privatization contract. (10) All moneys paid by a private firm to a county pursuant to a wastewater facility privatization contract shall be used for the purpose of reducing or offsetting property taxes, wastewater service rates, or debt reduction or asking infrastructure improvements or capital assets expenditures or other public purpose; provided, however, nothing herein shall preclude the county from using all or part of the moneys for the purpose of the county's qualification for relief from the repayment of federal grant awards associated with the wastewater system as may be required by federal law or regulation. 1-2 "'" -...I The county shall prepare a statement showing that the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is in the public interest, including a summary ofthe purchaser's or private firm's experience in water, sewer, and wastewater reuse utility operation and a showing of financial ability to provide the service, whether the purchaser or private firm is the county or the entity purchasing the utility from the county. Both Martin and St. Lucie Counties have determined that as part of the transfer of ownership of the BCC wastewater system to St. Lucie County, the requirements of Chapter 125.3401, Florida Statutes must be addressed. The remainder of this Briefing Document discusses the informational requirements as itemized by Chapter 125.3401, Florida Statutes. 1-3 ..... ., SECTION 2 INCOME AND EXPENSE STATEMENTS -- ...., SECTION 2 INCOME AND EXPENSE STATEMENTS 125.3401 (]) The most recent available income and expense statement for the Utilitv. The Utility operations of St. Lucie County is accounted for as an enterprise fund (on a total system basis) and does not account for the operations of the Beach Club Colony wastewater service area on an individual basis. As such, no Revenue and Expense Statement is available for the specific operations of the Beach Club Colony wastewater service area. Based upon information derived from detailed utility billing records for Martin County, the amount of revenues billed based on the application of St. Lucie County's monthly rates for service (as documented in Resolution No. 97-128) for the twelve months ended September 30,2000 was $19,392.00. This summary of utility revenues billed by St. Lucie County Utilities to Martin County for the Beach Club Colony wastewater service area is shown on Table 2-1. 2-1 ....... ...., TABLE 2-1 St. Lucie County - Martin County - Beach Club Colony - Wastewater Service Area Martin County Billed For Wastewater For Beach Club Colony Revenue Summary - Fiscal Year 2000 Premise No, 938 Customer No. 1394 Quarterlv Amount $4,848.00 Total Annual Billin!! to 09/30/00 $19,392.00 ......, ."", SECTION 3 BALANCE SHEET "'-" -.If SECTION 3 BALANCING SHEET 125.3401(2) The most recent available balance sheet for the utilities. listing assets and liabilities and clearlv showing the amount of contributions-in-aid-of-construction and accumulated depreciation thereon. As previously mentioned in Section 2, the utility operations of Martin County is accounted for as an enterprise fund (on a total system basis) and does not account for the operation of the Beach Club Colony wastewater service area on an individual basis. As such, no Balance Sheet or Statement of Financial Position is available for the specific operations of the Beach Club Colony wastewater service area. Presented on Table 3-1 is an estimate of the net plant in service for the wastewater facilities located within the Beach Club Colony service area. The estimate of the net plant in service value was based on i) an inventory of the facilities in service within the wastewater service area as estimated by Martin County's Environmental Service Department; ii) information derived from the acquisition ofIntercoastal Utility, Inc. in December 1986 by Martin County, which included the Beach Colony wastewater facilities; iii) other information as provided by Martin County. The estimate of the plant in service is considered by Martin County to be the estimated net replacement cost of the applicable wastewater plant facilities as of September 30, 2000. As shown in Table 3- I, Martin County estimates the net replacement cost of the Beach Club Colony wastewater facilities located within the applicable service area is approximately $157,321. As can be seen on Table 3-1, the facilities are compromised of a wastewater collection and force main system and do not include any wastewater treatment or effluent disposal facilities. St. Lucie County Utilities staff has examined the replacement cost and finds it reasonable. 3-1 .... ..., Table 3-1 Martin County / St. Lucie County - Beach Club Colony Wastewater Service Area Net Replacement Cost Estimate of Beach Club Colony Wastewater Facility DescriDtion 4-Inch Force Main 6-Inch Gravity Sewer 8-Inch Gravity Sewer IO-Inch Gravity Sewer Manholes Lift Stations Sewer Laterals Ouantitv 655.0 LF 1005.0 LF 610.0 LF 1280.0 LF 8 I 41 Current Estimate ReDlaéement Cost rI 1 $3,930 15,075 15,250 40,960 13,600 65,000 19.680 Total Estimated Construction Cost $173,495 Allowance for Engineering/Design 26.024 Total Estimated Replacement Cost $199,519 Estimated Accounted Depreciation <42.198> Net Estimated Replacement Cost ~157.321 [1] Source Document Martin County - net replacement cost in which we concur after performing our own audit. LF =Linear Feet .... ..." SECTION 4 STATEMENT OF EXISTING RATE BASE ..... ...., SECTION 4 STATEMENT OF EXISTING RATE BASE 125.340](3) A statement of the existinf! rate base of the utilitv for rerrnlatorv DurDoses. Generally speaking, the rate base of a utility company represents the depreciated cost to the utility company of the plant and facilities financed by the owners of the utility which is used to provide service to the public. Specifically, rate base of a utility includes gross plant in service, less accumulated depreciation and net contributed capitol and/or plant, and allowance for working capital, materials and supplies inventory, and certain other financial considerations. The concept of rate base essentially deals with the establishment of rates for a privately owned utility which is usually regulated by the Florida Public Service Commission (for privàte utilities operated in Martin and S1. Lucie Counties). The rate base represents the level of equity investment of the utility system by the owners of such private utility for which they are allowed to earn a rate of return. The establishment of rates for the County does not recognize the provision of a return on rate base. The proposed sale of assets is by Martin County to St. Lucie County, another public agency (which also does not set rates based on the rate of return concept). In the absence of rate based data the proposed acquisition has been base upon a negotiation purchase price essentially following the net replacement cost of the system. As previously mentioned in Section 3 of this Briefing Document, the net replacement cost of the wastewater system located within the Beach Club Colony wastewater service area was estimated by Martin County to be $157,321. 4-1 ..... ...., SECTION 5 PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE UTILITY FACILITY ""'" ...., SECTION 5 PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE UTILITY FACILITIES acilities bein urchased or sold. A description of the wastewater facilities located within the Beach Club Colony service area was presented in Section 3 of this Briefmg Document. With respect to the wastewater collection and transmission system, in June 1995 Martin County televised (inspected) all the lines to review their condition and all needed repairs were perfonned. Martin County subsequently televised (inspected) the collection and transmission system during August 2000 and reports that the facilities for this functional category to be in good working condition. St. Lucie County will receive all records, reports, and tapes of the system. The wastewater facilities also include one lift station. The lift station consists of hand bolted submersible single phase 230 volt pumps with 3-inch discharge piping consisting of polyvinyl chloride (PVe) materials. The facilities have been routinely inspected by Martin County to ensure proper operations and are considered by Martin County to be in good condition. 5-1 '-' -...I SECTION 6 REASONABLENESS OF PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS 4 . '-' -...I SECTION 6 REASONABLENESS OF PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS 125.3401 (5) The reasonableness ofvurchase or sales Drice and terms. Based on the review of the utility assets which would be conveyed to 51. Lucie County ITom Martin County as a result ofthe transaction, and the proposed acquisition payment terms of the seller, both public entities are of the general opinion that the acquisition price for the utility assets of the Beach Club Colony wastewater service area of$136,545 is a reasonable proposal. This transaction price was based on an analysis of the net asset value as shown by the replacement cost analysis on Table 3-1. 6-1 '-' -...I SECTION 7 IMP ACT OF PURCHASE '-' -...I SECTION 7 IMP ACTS OF PURCHASE 125,3401 (61 The imoacts of the ourchase or sale on utility customers. both oositive and ner¡ative. With respect to the wastewater customers located in the Beach Club Colony service area, the estimated effects resulting from the sale of the wastewater utility assets from Martin County to S1. Lucie County are summarized below: 1. The customers located within the Beach Club Colony service area will experience a decrease in the monthly bill for wastewater service. Assuming an average monthly service requirement of 4,000 gallons based on the service characteristics of the' service area, the average individually metered residential customer (which represents the majority ofthe customers served) could expect to receive a rate decrease of $10.48 or 39.56%, per month as shown below: Average Month Service requirement per Martin County Rate Structure Amount 4,000 gallons Existing Martin county Rates Existing St. Lucie County rates[l] $26.48 $16,00 Difference Amount Percent of Reduction $10.48 39.56% 2. The customers are currently located within the South Hutchinson Island Municipal Service Benefit Unit and are charged an annual non-ad valorem assessment of $260.35 per equivalent dwelling unit by S1. Lucie County for the cost of construction of the wastewater treatment disposal facilities of such County. The non-ad valorem assessment will not change, but would include assessed customers as part of the system from which they are already receiving service. 3. Customers of the Beach Club Colony service area will receive local representation relative to customer service, rate regulatory issues, and overall system operations since those customers now located in S1. Lucie County will be served and represented by S1. Lucie County. [1] S1. Lucie County Utility rates (Res. 97-128) are flat rates of$I6.00 per month per EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit) billed quarterly in advance. 7-1 "- ...., SECTION 8 ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT REQUIRED . I '-' -wi SECTION 8 ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT REQUIRED 125.3401 (7) anv additional investment reauired and the ability and willimmess of the Countv to make that investment. 1 It is currently anticipated that acquisition of the Beach Club Colony wastewater collection system by St. Lucie County will only warrant normal additional investments (general recurring renewals and replacements) in order for the assets purchased to reach the useful or expectant service life. . If 8-1 '-' -...I SECTION 9 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PURCHASE '-' "wi! SECTION 9 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PURCHASE 125.3401 (8) The alternatives to the Durchase or sale and Dotential imDact on utilitv customers if the Durchase or sale is not made. There is essentially only one alternative to the purchase of the Beach Club Colony service area wastewater collection facilities by St. Lucie County. This alternative is the continued ownership of the service area by Martin County (i.e. - no transaction). Since: i) the operation of this service area represents an existing segment of the County's consolidated system; and ii) the service area is already receiving wastewater treatment services from the St. Lucie County Utility System; and iii) the Beach Club Colony service area is essentially bordered by the utility system owned by St. Lucie County, the only reasonable transaction would be either to "square off' the service territories of the two counties or maintain the status quo (i.e. - Martin County ownership). 9-1 '-' -...I SECTION 10 STATEMENT OF QUALITY SERVICE '-' ..., SECTION 10 STATEMENT OF QUALITY SERVICE 125.340](9) The ability of the ourchaser to orovide and maintain hirzh aualitv and cost effective utilitv service. whether the ourchaser is the Countv or the entitv ourchasinrz the utilitv from the County. St. Lucie County currently operates a public wastewater utility system known as the South Hutchinson Island Wastewater and Reclaimed Water Utility District, which includes the Beach Club Colony wastewater facilities. St Lucie County Utilities has consistently complied with all regulations required by various regulatory agencies and covenants dictated by financing institutions. In order to provide and maintain high quality and cost effective utility services, St. Lucie County currently engages the professional services of a well recognized consulting and engineering firm to quarterly inspect the entire utility system which serves the customers of Beach Club Colony. An annual report reflecting the operation and maintenance performance as well as the overall condition of the facilities is produced to assure that the system maintains the highest quality operating standards for the customers. In addition, a renewal and replacement fund exists for the replacement of all components within the system to ensure the highest level of service to the customers. IO-I '"'" -...I SECTION 11 STATEMENT OF PUBLIC INTEREST 1 ~ '-' ....,I SECTION 11 STATEMENT OF PUBLIC INTEREST Statement of Public Interest Based upon the foregoing, we would recommend that the purchase of Beach Club Colony wastewater service area collection system is in the public interest for the following reasons: I. Customers will continue to receive the highest quality service. 2. S1. Lucie County Utilities has been operating three wastewater plants and two water systems under the current structure since 1994. An additional wastewater and water system was acquired in the North County area in July 1999. St. Lucie County Utilities is committed to providing the highest quality service to its customers and have operated all facilities in accordance with regulatory agencies without deficiencies since 1994. 3. S1. Lucie County Utilities has the financial ability to operate all facilities as evident in Table 1 I-I, Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings as taken from "Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year ended September 30,1999 Report of Independent Auditors". 4. The total cost of wastewater service will be decreased. Individual savings will vary based on historical consumptive values relative to the rates of Martin County with the average customer receiving a reduction of approximately $ I 0.48 per month. \1-1 "" ...." il - I ¡ ¡ Ii I i If [1' 'gJI g, I f~ J.! r B I.. ã ã ~f I ¡ ~ - ~ ~ 9 Jl Q ¡ . ... ... Î~ ~ - Øii i · '{g II '0 !!i e! - \00 ... ~ t; ,..... - -- 1: :- § è ¡ ~li~i~~iii5 :.0 VI a - f '"... ....,¡.:' ... ... * ~ ~ y . ¡::; Ii ~ - - ~.. ~¡¡...t~~;¡; ::¡ ... ... ~ - - i3~~~~"'~~i~ ~ ~ !1i~ ~ 0' ,- ... "'tt....o 1i ;r ~ ~. 1 - Do . ... ... ft iOQ * ,~ ß~OQftn S f"" ~ ~ r ~ ~ . ~ I S' It i. j .. ~ ... -... ~ _1::_ 5: . 1 1 1 m~tt~ I t~ ¡;; , .!!>.... ~ .... f . fa. Q - ... ... ~ i if ~ - I - ¡z II - ~ - ~ ~'f ~ ... ... -- . ... - W NUt W_ ~ ... ... 88 ~ ~UII t:~sq~\O ~i ~ J'O · - ~ 5: !1~:g b~ . ~ kJ-ü,- - - ~..... ,'" ,ã_~",I!JIi:¡ 8 ... ... ¡n Nt! ~ íJ :- If ~ ~ -~I:!~ - t¡ i!ìõõ", !h ~ '" . ü, ~':..I""" ~ . ':'" - ~ .. :: Uti -tõõ; _1:1 .. , ~ -~::s 11..,:8-.. I!J...... !! ~ ~ ~ ... ... r ~ ~"' ~ ~ ~f ; i - ~ -¡;¡ ,.. ~ g..._tt. '" 2 ... b ~ :0. , :U I¡~t!~~l:! å riJ - ¡; 0 ~ '-' ~ ... ... ~~, = 0 ~ ê · - ß - " .... ..... ..... ..... j,' '" - - - . !::I 1:1 , ~Ui~1 1 ü, Õ, - Õ fI( r 0 ... ... ~~ - - ;~ ~ ~ - . ij fi fi -- - .... --~ ~ ..."'....."''''~... .- · :s~ . ]:c¡ e; ....0."'_. . -= 00 I . . 1 ,N~L\!~;¡::: t! ... ... ~ - ~~ ~~ - .' fi ~.- ~ ! i fA ¡I ..,..... "''ON 8:5:"'- ...... · ~'ß c:le:8~\G- ;:;ü: e: - i :.0 ·èI~""·-¡gj:J·:,..t!1:I ~ ~. ~ - -ªJ Šo c!Š..!~:g~O ~ "'" 'WI APPENDIX A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT '-' '-'" APPENDIX B LETTER FROM HOWARD C OSTERMAN, INC. UTILITY CONSULTANT FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY UTILITIES , ~ r """ AGENDA REQth!tT ITEM NO. (....5 DATE: January 9, 2001 CONSENT [X] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [] Leg. ( Quasi-JD. ( SUBMITTED BY (DEPT):Community Development Department PRESEf2. BY: ~-' '/; t/ .,. ,----- , . ",,(,.~. ", ~£_, Zw ,-'-<.-é. /1 apartment Head and #3 for World of Pla~ics/Oleander Business TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Requested Change Orders #2 Park CDBG Grant project. The Contractor requested two time extensions on the above referenced project. The first request was made on February 2, 2000, for a three-day extension due to the replacement of a drainage pipe at the intersection of Digiorgio and Enterprise Roads by the St. Lucie County Road and Bridge Department. The second request was made on March 16, 2000, for an additional twenty-day extension due to a delay on the delivery of some pipe. Both were approved administratively, but appear not to have received formal BOCC approval. BACKGROUND: This action will be an after-the-fact BOCC approval for time extensions for work completed by the contractor. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Change Orders #1 (requested June 20, BOCC. (requested January 31, 2000) and #4 2000) were previously approved by the RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board execute Change Orders #2 and #3 for time extensions on work previously completed and to ensure that all grant paperwork is in compliance with state and federal regulations. COMMISSION ACTION: CONC : L x J A1".t"t<.UV~J.) L ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: :JJ; ou Coordination/Signatures Administrator county Attorney: Mgt &; Budget: Purchasing : Originating Dept: Other: other = Finance: (copies only): Er!'.11.H/93 '-' ...., MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT · TO: Board of CO~~'.Co~.. '§sioners ,,/ . ,./: ,.X ç t</t::.-r.--¿ ~- _ ~ l ,,-"'(, - ;"-(..L. J~SheWC UK, comrnunl<; Development Ij J·anuary 9, 2001 ~ FROM: Director DATE: , SUBJECT: World of Plastics/Oleander Business Park CDBG Grant, / · 1 The CDBG Grant for the Oleander Business Park is nearing completion. On internal review of the required paperwork, it appears that two requests by the contractor, Sheltra Construction, via the Engineer, LBFH, Inc., through the County Grants Subcontractor, Nancy Phillips and Associates, for minor time extensions have not been formally approved by the BOCC. The first request was made on February 2, 2000, for a three-day extension due to the replacement of a drainage pipe and the second request was made on March 16, 2000, for an additional twenty-day extension due to a delay on the delivery of some pipe. Both were approved administratively. There are no additional costs included in this action. Staff anticipates one additional change order tied to a close out payment to the contractor during the first quarter of 2001. This final work request and payment will be brought to the Board for discussion at the appropriate time. . 4 · The Commission will be requested to formally approve the two requested change orders so that all records are in compliance with state and federal regulations. '-' AGENDA REOUEST 'WI ITEM NO. C-6 DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant Citizen's Advisory Task Force BACKGROUND: Commissioner Bruhn wishes to appoint Clyde Killerto the Community Development Block Grant Citizen's Advisory Task Force. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board ratify Commissioner Bruhn's appointment of Clyde Killer to serve on the Community Development Block Grant Citizen's Advisory Task Force. [xJ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ugl Anderson ounty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Approvals county Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other; Other: Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 \/ "-' -...I AGENDA REQUEST DAT:;:¡\siò'ë/ I) REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING AMENDED CONSENT (x ) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Roger A. Shinn Robert Bradshaw Ray Wazny SUBMITTED BY(DEPT) Central services/Administration/Public Works SUBJECT: RFP - #00-097 Architectural Services BACKGROUND: RFP's for Architectural Services were sent out and received from four(4) vendors. A Short-list Committee met to evaluate the RFP responses. based on the criteria in the RFP and Chapter 287 (minority status) . The Committee's decision was to short-list all four (4) vendors; however, the committee is recommending that contract negotiations be entered into with two(2) firms based on projected needs for the future. PREVIOUS ACTION: Short-list Committee meeting 12-12-00 Short-list committee meeting 12-19-00 FUND AVAIL.: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board approve the two(2) firms, Edlund & Dritenbas and REG Architects and enter into a contract for two(2) years with an option of two (2) - one(l) year extensions. [X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED nderson Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Atty: () Purchasing: () Review and Approval Management &0 Budget: () Origin. Dept: () Other: () Eff. 6/3/96 , '-' -' MEMORANDUM CENTRAL SERVICES TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Roger Shinn, Director, Central Services DATE: January 2,2001 SUBJECT: AGENDA REQUEST Continuing Agreement for Architectural Services BACKGROUND: The Short-List Committee met on December 19th to evaluate the RFP responses for Architectural Services, After discussion and based on ranking criteria listed in RFP, Part IV (attached), it was decided to enter into contract negotiations with the two(2) firms, The fIrms are: Edlund and Dritenbas and REG Architects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the two(2) fIrms and enter into a contract for two(2) years with an option of two(2 ) one(l) year extensions. ~tv~ R GER A. SHINN RAS:bk att. · I '"'" '-' SHORT-LIST COMMITTEE RFP #00-097 CONTINUING CONSULTING SERVICES - ARCHITECTURAL FIRMS Minutes December 19, 2000 A meeting of the Short-list Committee for RFP #00-097 was held on December 19, 2000 at 2:30 in the Law Library, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL. In attendance were: Robert Bradshaw Katherine MacKenzie Smith Ray Wazny Don McLam Dino DeRostaing Roger Shinn Two(2) factors were discussed and decided upon: 1. How many architectural firms are needed. It was decided that two(2) firms were needed based on the number of projects we feel we might have for the next two(2) years. 2. The final decision was to select the firms. This was based on the ranking criteria from the RFP.(see attached) The firms were rated on a point system from 1 to 4 (with (1) being the best score) Edlund & Dritenbas.......................5 REG Architects......................·····..··12 Stebbins,Scott & Bergman.............16 Hanson Engineers............................17 Consideration on above was also given these firms in accordance with Chapter 287 (minority status.) The Committee agreed to go before the Board with the two (2) firms and recommend entering into negotiations for a two(2) year term with an option for two(2)-one(l) year extensions. Barbara Kennedy Recording Secretary 3-2 PROPOSA.L'r'ORMAT -...I Proposers shall prepare their proposals using the following format: A Letter of Transmittal This letter will summarize in a brief and concise manner, the Proposer's understanding of the Scope of Work. The letter must name all of the persons authorized to make representations for the Proposer, including the titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of such persons. An official authorized to negotiate for the Proposer must sign the Letter of Transmittal. B. Oroanization Profile and Qualifications This section of the proposal must describe the Proposer, including the size, range of activities, etc. Each Proposer must be authorized to do business in the State of Florida and, if a Corporation, must be incorporated under the laws of one of the States of the United States, proof of same must be provided. The Proposer must emphasize its expertise in, and experience with similar programs. The proposal must identify the primary individuals responsible for supervising the work. The Proposer shall provide the County with the resumes of the primary individuals. The proposals must also include recent and pertinent references, includingpank references, contact name, telephone number and address. C. Scope of Worn This section of the proposal should explain the Seepe of Work as understood by the Proposer and detail the approach, activities and work products to be provided. Proposer should not include a proposal for the compensation to be paid for the required services. D. Compensation The proposal shall not be included.. E. Additional Data Any additional information which the Proposer cOnsiders pertinent for consideration should be included in a separate section of the proposal. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS Part N 4-1 EVALUATION METHOD AND CRITERIA A General The County shall be the sole judge of its own best interests, the proposal, and the resulting negotiated agreement. The County reserves the right to investigate the financial capability, reputation, integrity, skill, business experience and quality of performance under similar operations of each Proposer, inctuding stockholders and principals before making an award. Awards, if any, will be based on both an objective -7- '. -- ~~~{ .:-',.'.i~:', and subjective com~rison of Proposals and proposers:-fne County's decisions will be final. . The County's evaluation criteria will include, but shall not be limited to, consideration of the following: 1. verification of availability of equipment; 2. verification of availability of qualified personnel; 3. past performance records; 4. ability to meet set standards; 5. qualifications of Proposer; 6. expertise of human resources; 7. technical soundness of proposal; 8. time frames; 9. past contracts with the County and other govemmental jurisdictions; · 10. . related experience in St Lucie County; 11. references; 12. financial resources and capabilities. B. Selection The selection of a Proposer to Provide the required servi~s shall be in accordance with Section 287.55, Florida Statutes and Section 10 of the'St Lucie County Purchasing Manual. The Board of County Commissioners may Conduct the selection process or at the option of the Board,· it may be referred to the Competitive Selection Committee (the "Committee'l . Either the Board or the Comm ittee wi1l review all proposals received and establish. a list in order of preference of no fewer than three Proposers deemed to be the most qualified to provide the service requested based on the· criteria set forth above. Altematively, the Board may direct the Committee to establish a "short list" of no fewer than three. Proposers without establishing a' priority orde~. . The "short list" shall be submitted to the Board and the Board may rank the Proposers in order of preference. The Committee or the Board may request oral preser1tatior¡ fr:om the p'roposers :WI1en establishing the priority list If three or fewer proposals are reCeived, all PropoSerS shallbe induded in the selection process as described below· .. . . . If the list of Proposers lias been prepared by the Committee,· the list shall be submitted to the Board for approval. At the option of the Board, either the Board or the.- Committee shall attempt to negotiate à contract with the most qualified Proposer at a compensation which is fair, competitive and reasonable. If the Committee or the Board is unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the first Proposer, negotiations with that Proposer shall be terminated and the Committee or the Board shall attempt to negotiate a contract with the next most qualified Proposer. If tj1ese negotiations .are not successful, negotiations shall be terminated with the second Proposer and attempted with the third most qualified. If the Board or the Com m ittee is not successful in negotiating a satisfactory contract with any of the selected Proposers, the Board or the' Committee shall select -8- ..-- -------_.- -- -_-.--:.... .,".-:. L·fY~ ,J'P' ; ""'" .....,¡ AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO C,..-g DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR ' PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT )(. SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : COMMUNITY SERVICES PRESENTED BY: BETH RYDER, DIRECTOR~LJL TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Appointment of members to the Treasure Coast Community Services Tripartite Board for the St. Lucie/Martin/Okeechobee County Community Action Agency. BACKGROUND: SEE ATTACHED MEMO NO. 01-21 FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On May 20, 1997 the Board adopted Resolution No 97-121 requesting designation as an eligible entity for CSBG Program funding for St. Lucie, Martin County and Okeechobee County in a multi-county program, on June 24, 1997 the Board approved the Interlocal Agreement between all three counties, on July 15, 1997 the Board approved the By-laws for the Tripartite Board and on August 12, 1997 the Board approved the appointment of Commsr. Lewis (or her designee) and Grace McNeil to the Treasure Coast Community Action Advisory Board. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board re-appoint the current representatives for St. Lucie County to the Treasure Coast Community Action Agency Board. [x [ APPROVED OTHER: ] DENIED u as M. Anderson nty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: county Attorney: t<r' Coordination/Sianatures rflr-l'rJUL Management & 8Udget:~ Other: Purchasing: Other: Originating Department: Finance: Check for Copy only, if applicable '-' '-" Community Services MEMORANDUM # 01-21 FROM: Board of County Commissioners Beth Ryder, Community Services Director eð-- TO: SUBJECT: Board Members for the Tripartite Treasure Coast Community Action Agency with St. Lucie, Martin and Okeechobee County. DATE: January 9, 2001 On August 12, 1997 the Board approved the appointment of members to the Treasure Coast Community Action Agency Board for a 3-year term which expires February 25, 2001. Three different sectors of our community must be represented and staff is recommending the Board re-appoint the following people to serve on the Board for another 3-year term. 1) One elected official or designated representative so specified: Re-appoint Commissioner Paula Lewis or a designated staff person. Currently Barbara Burse is serving as the representative. 2) One representative of business, industry, labor, religious, welfare, or education interests in the county so specified: Re-appoint Grace McNeil· retired manager of the welfare department. In accordance with the by-laws the third member represents the low income population and must be selected in a democratic procedure. An election will be held on February 8, 2001 at the Lincoln Park Community Center. Mr. Reggan Ellis is the current representative. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board re-appoint the current representatives for St. Lucie County to the Treasure Coast Community Action Agency Board. G:\wp\memos\memos2001 \01·21 '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY ....,,¡ MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 4 District 5 AGENDA January 9, 2001 1. MINUTES A, Approve the minutes of the meeting held December 12, 2000. 2, GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 11 thru No. 14 2. PURCHASING Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise for bids for 18 inch diameter, 6,000 GPM at 4 ft. Static Head, A.'{ial Flow, Stainless Steel, Electric Lift Pumps, purchase and maintenance. ~OTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Serviccs :Vlanager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. 12/15/00 FZABIlARR "- LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD '-' IlARRANT LIST #11- 09-DEC-2000 TO 1S-DEC-2000 FUND SUHMARY- MOSQUITO EXPENSES FUND TITLE 145 Mosquito Flffid 8,068.77 8,068.77 GRAND TOTAL: PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 12/27/00 !!P:' LUCIE COUNl'Y - BOARD FZABIIARR -...I IIARRANT LIST #12- 16-DEC-20oo TO 22-DEC-2000 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND TITLE 145 Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 4,358.00 4,358.00 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 23,638.41 23,638.41 12/29/00 FZAB\1ARR ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ""'" \1ARRANT LIST #13- 23-DEC-2000 TO 29-DEC-20oo FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO EXPENSES FUND TITLE 145 Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: 7,042.53 7,042.53 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 WARRANT LIST #14- 30-DEC-2000 TO 05-JAN-2001 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO EXPENSES 01105/01 "'fr. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD FZABWARR FUND 145 TITLE Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: , ..., 48,921.10 48,921.10 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 21,842.18 21,842.18 v, 'W' AGENDA REQUEST ~ ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING CHARLES BICHT SUBJECT: Permission to advertise for bids for 18 inch Diameter, 6,000 GPM Pumps, purchase and maintenance BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise for bids for 18 inch Diameter, 6,000 GPM at 4 ft. Static Head, Axial Flow, Stainless Steel, Electric Lift Pumps, purchase and maintenance. COMMISSION ACTION: NCE: [XJ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 9r/ County Attomey:(X) i,. .' Coordination/Siqnatures Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr,:(X) cß Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) EIf.1/9? G:\CC~10~\AGE~~AS\OT.HER\per adv pumps Mas C~ntrol.wpd ....... ...., ._ __~ ~: ;:,::~ j;: 3 G. DIVISION OF MOSQU1TÓ "èOr.l'ROL . TO: Charles Bicht, Purchasing Manager r FROM: James R. David, Mosquito Control Director DATE: December 4, 2000 SUBJECT: 18 inch Diameter, 6,000 GPM at 4 ft. Static Head, Axial Flow, Stainless Steel, Electric Lift Pump - Call for Bids A Attached are the specifications for a Call for Bids for the "Purchase and Annual Maintenance of an 18 inch Diameter, 6,000 GPM at 4 ft. Static Head, Axial Flow, Stainless Steel, Electric Lift Pump". Funds are available for repairs and upgrades through our equipment maintenance account, and the purchase of new pumps is planed to be funded over the next three years (the expected life of the annually renewable contract) via grants, and pending DEP permitting of the Bear Point Mitbank, via local funds. Also attached is the required Bid Request Form and a list of suggested vendors. Please process as required by the regulations and Purchasing guidelines set forth by the Board of County Commissioners. Should you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. cc: file · '-' ....., SAINT LUCIE COill'i"TY MOSQUITO CON"TROL DISTRICT CALL FOR BIDS Sealed Bids will be received by the Purchasing Director on Wednesday, 2001, at _11:00 A.M., for the following: BID # - "Purchase and Annual Maintenance of an 18 inch Diameter, 6,000 GPM at 4 ft. Static Head, Axial Flow, Stainless Steel, Electric Lift Pump" SLC Mosquito Control District Bid Documents can be obtained from the Office of the Purchasing Manager at 2300 Virginia Ave., Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, Telephone: (561) 462-1700. Bids may be either mailed or hand delivered to the Purchasing Department at 2300 Virginia Ave., Fort Pierce, Florida 34982. The Mosquito Control District reserves the right to waive any informalities or minor irregularities, reject any and all bids which are incomplete, conditional, obscure, or which contain additions not allowed for, accept or reject any bid in whole or in part with or without cause, and accept the bid which best serves the District. For additional information on this or other St. Lucie County bids call 462-1212 then enter BIDS (2437). Saint Lucie County is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. SAINT LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BY: CHARLES BICHT, PURCHASING MANAGER PUBLISH: , 2000 BILL & PROOF: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FT. PIERCE, FL 34982 '-' '-....I INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS SAI;';"f LUCIE COUN"fY MOSQUITO CONtROL DISTRlCT SEALED BIDS FOR THE: "PURCHASE AND ANNUAL MAINTENA1'lCE OF AN 18 INCH DIAlvIETER, 6,000 GPM AT 4 FT. STATIC HEAD, AXIAL FLOW, STAINLESS STEEL, ELECTRlC LIFT PUMP" SLC MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRlCT BID # - will be received by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, MOSQUITO COl'HROL DISTRICT at the Office of the Purchasing Director, Purchasing Department, 2300 Virginia Ave, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 up until_1l:00_ A.M., local time, and opened as soon as possible on ,2001. The successful bidder will, within ten (10) calendar days after written notice of such award, enter into a written contract with the Mosquito Control Board of St. Lucie County in accordance with the accepted bid. The Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County, Florida (Mosquito Control District) reserves the right to waive any informalities or minor irregularities, reject any and all bids which are incomplete, conditional, obscure, or which contain additions not allowed for, accept or reject any bid which best serves the County. Alternate bids not meeting specifications may be considered, but can be rejected without cause. No proposal can be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of opening of bids. Bids received after the time and.date specified will not be considered but will be returned unopened. Each Bid must be submitted in a sealed envelope with Bid Number, Bidder's name and address, Date and time of Bid Opening, and addressed to the Purchasing Director, St. Lucie County, Florida. ENVELOPE MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED WITH ITEM. BID NUMBER. DATE AND TIME OF BID OPENING. '-' -...I BASE PUMP SPECIFICATIONS FOR A NEW IS INCH DIAMETER, 6,000 GPM AT 4 FT. STATIC HEAD, AXIAL FLOW, STAiNLESS STEEL, ELECTRlC LIFT PUMP Construction of Pump Components '-- An pump components are to be made out of Type 304 stainless steel, Type 316 stainless steel, and/or bronze, as specified. Pump Barrel The straight, constant diameter portion of the pump barrel is to be 18 inches in diameter. The entire pump length is to be 178 inches in length (+/-12 inches bell included; see drawing labeled "Assembly 1"). The barrel and pipe are to be a minimum of 1/4 inch thick. All welds are to be full penetration. Electric Motor Tatung 20 Hp, Frame No. 261, RPM 1760, Volts 23, 3 Phase Thrust Bearing The thrust bearing, Dodge Type E 1-15/16 inch diameter, is located above the top bearing plate. The thrust bearing must be able to withstand the entire weight of the rotating element of the pump and the hydraulic thrust imposed by the impeller, as well as, the radial load created by the rotation of the belt drive. Marine Bearings There are four (4) Marine Bearings. The first is located 73 inches below the top thrust bearing. Two (2) are located in the straightener hub above the impener. The fourth bearing is located in the bottom bearing housing below the impeller. Packing Gland Assembly ThePacking Gland Assembly is located between the top bearing plate and the packing gland interual plate. The Packing Gland Assembly is to be constructed from 304 stainless steel with a bronze packer using 3/8" X 3/8" graphite packing. Pump Bowl and Intake Bell The Pump Bowl Assembly and Intake Bell are to be manufactured from 304 stainless steel. Both are to have 304 88 straightening vanes, with the Intake Bell diameter opening a minimum of two times the diameter of the impeller, being constructed so as to minimi7.e vortex tendencies, by maintaining equal pressure and velocity across the entire bell entrance opening. In addition, sufficient trashguards/grating (30488) is to be installed in the ben to ..... ...., reduce the amount and size of damaging debris that is allowed to enter the pump. Impeller The Impeller and pump bowl is to have its design certified to show the pump capacity, the Total Dynamic Head, the speed of operation, and the horsepower requirement. The Impeller blades are to be formed with rounded leading edges and tapered trailing edges, and otherwise possess smooth contours for hydraulic efficiency. Blades are to be chamfered on both sides at the root for full penetration welding to the hub. The periphery of the blades are to be machined for a "dose running fit" with the impeller band, and the complete impeller shall be statically balanced. Pump Shaft The Pump Shaft is to be of sufficient diameter to transmit full load torque without vibrating. The shafting is to be manufactured from pump quality shafting of 316 stainless steel possessing a diameter of 1-15/16 inches. Zinc Anode Plate Two zinc anode plates are to be attached (bolted or welded) to the intake bell. Pump Coating The pump is to be coated with "Z6hpar Epoxy" (except the zinc plates). Warranty Tbe pumping system as described shall be warranted by the manufacturer against defects in material and workmanship under normal mosquito control use and service, for a period of two years from the date of acceptance. Base Bid for New 18 inch 6,000 gpm, Axial flow, Stainless steel, Electric Pump Includes Adjustable electric motor base Stainless steel belt guard Belts, sheaves and bushings Discharge flange Pump mounting bracket Base Bid Amount (Quotation No.1 Ref. Assemblies 1-4) '-' lnC/.) ~--1 ...... -,- ru - II;:::S ~ ¡::¡ f- ¡::¡ O-oUf- ......,::I:1<I: W' l:J¡-"'=W Z..........g--1 <I:= -0 --1ru=:r: L.. '-' ru ¡::¡ o a:: L:J :z: ~ f- :z: :::J ~~1 ...., "<t' , C") C1' aJ . . ru , ...... ;0 -0 In L C/.) :z: o ~ C/.) :z: W :::;: ~ ......¡::¡a... >- >- :::;: --1--1:::J ,::I:1,::I:1 Cl... :::;: :::;: - wWaJ C/.)C/.)¡-... C/.)C/.)...... <I: <I: Cl... ::;;: :::J Cl... "<t' , ...... a:: W --1 J~ o 0 In "<t' W :z: ~ --1 a:: W f- :z: W U = C'? ~ z - z::;. - ~ <I: <=>-"" ù""<=> -w ::;:<=>z WO-D t-1::E_1-I U:::;)!- :::;)0-<1: ....J ~ - !- u.. !-u.._ ""-U ....JW 0- "" <I: ~ ¡::¡ ~ ..-< L-II_ >- ¡::::¡ <I: a:: ,::I:1 <I: f- a:: W C1',::I:1 C1'D ,a:: ~:>: ',::I:1 In:z -:;3: W<I: f-a:: ~¡::::¡ aJ ....... ! "" <I: W t~ ¡-... -' ru:;¡! 1 T ~ ___I CT'> --- '-' W L:J Z <I: ....JV') u...V') W~ L:J= O:::M <I: :::C~ U, V')- ....... ~ ....JV') ....JV') W :::c~ V') = o..M ~~ =h.... a...... ....J ....... <I: f- W ~ W > ....... 0::: ~ f- ....J W ,e::¡ , 0::: CJ f- CJ ~ U ....... 0::: f- U W ....J W W W V') V') V') f-'" u...- <I:M :::C<I: V')....... W~ ~.'" ....J' Ln ..... f- W ~ U <I: 0::: ,e::¡ f- 0::: CJ a.. a.. ~ V) ...... W >-V') wV') L:J~ z= .......M f- u...~ ....... ........ ....J ..... ""'" 0::: W ~ ....... a.. V') L.:iV) zV) ....... O:::~ <I: <=> WM ,e::¡ ~ ....... ~ i ....... <I: f- W ~ >- V') V') <I: ....J :::0 CJ ,e::¡ W W V') V') >-V') \::;IV') V')~ O:::M W :::CO::: V')CJ <I: :::o~ M V') f- W :::::J ,e::¡ Z CJ V')f- f-W ....JO::: §<I: W f-....JU CJ....J f- Z <I: W f- Z W Z D CL ~ D U ¡::¡ Z <I: ....JV') <I:Z .......CJ (\JQ::....... f- >-W<I: ....Jf-U p:,<I:....... ::¡;~u... w ....... "">-U ""....JW <I:¡::¡a.. ~V') W v.> v.> <I: CL ~ :::::J CL L.:i Z Z....... _ L.:i:::O ¡::¡_<I: . VJ Q:: L1W¡::¡ :::;:¡::¡ Z WCLD -:::;:- U::Jf- ::JCL<I: ....J U . r- c: f-u..._ VJ o- >- ¡::¡ <I: 0::: ,e::¡ - ,,e::¡ LnZ w:::O f-<C <I: 0::: ~¡::¡ L.::J W I- Z <[ 0.:: ...... ---l 0.:: W L:J <[ a.... ::;. Z L:J W L.::J 0 ...... '-D¡:Q l- I- I- Z I- Z ,...., :::J ...... 'I- :::E :::JW Z I >=1 WO---l WW Ln W L.::J Z ---l:::E>- >:::J ...... :::J Z <[ a.... 0.:: ¡:Q I- 0 <[¡:Q ......I ...... ---l <[o.::W 0.:: l:J I- Wa.... Xl- <[ 1-0 I:::E W l:Jc;, WI-I- (\J :::JOO ....... W:::J wW ¡:Q Zw J:::E> I 0....0.... L.::J ::::---l Z >=1 ...... -..D :::::'-D I <C I- ::':::0 <CUo.... ....... W UI W , :::J...... W---l :::J ......~ 0...., <C I- Wo.::W r.n Ln a....u.. 0.:: o....w <[ ....... I Wt):::E :,¿- >-1- W ---l ....... W...... I----l I- Ww 0.... ---l W <C Wu ---l---lo.:: (/) ~X WO (/) U L:J <[ W u.. (/) - L.::J¡:Q (/) v<[ I- - >=1,.., = :::E V ¡::r:¡ :,¿ °v C"'JI = C"'JW >=1 ~ ~ I- >=1 C"'J v...... Z ::::.::;. <C ---l L:J L.::J . Z ...... ::.::: U <C a.... (/) (/) '<:t' = C"'J ~ CO , C"'J I- ---l W I'Q '-D '-D I'Q ,.., C"'J ~ >=1 0.:: <C :::J L.::J I- ---l W I'Q (/) (/) L:J Z ...... I WW >:::J <[I'Q Wo.:: IO (/)1- 0.::0 0::::: I-CO 0, :::Er.n >=1_ W "2 X ;;;£>=1 C"'JW 0.:: o WI- (/)0 <[:::E IU a.......... 0.:: C"'JI- U a....W I---l W o (\J:::E L.::Ja.... zo.:: :::Jo I-r.n <[r- I- ....... >-L.::J Wz W...... <[::.::: ~U z<[ <[a.... -1 _ l:J C (/) l:JCO ~, :'¿C"'J U <[u.. 0....0 W(/) N::;. Zo Do.:: 0.:: ¡::r:¡,.., r.n o~ '-D '-DI , I- W...... W::;. -1 ...... <[ I- W >=1 W > ...... 0.:: ¡:=¡ I- C"?o >-¡::r:¡ ¡:¡:j, :::¡: Wo.:: V)D V) I- <[0 ::::: U ...... 0.:: I- U W -1 W L:J Z ...... Z::;. - L.::J <[ >=1......0<: Ú(/)~ -W :::E¡:=¡Z Wo....D 1--I.:::2:~ U:::JI- :::Ja....<[ ---l U >-I . I- !..... I-!.....>-I (/)...... U -1W 0.... W >- ¡:=¡ <[ 0.:: ¡::r:¡ <C I- 0.:: W ¡::r:¡ 0"0 0"0.:: , ID;>: ,¡::r:¡ LnZ W::;. I- <[ <[ 0.:: >=1 ¡:=¡ '-' V) W z'-oO <1:, >Ln ...... V) c¿...... f- W c¿ P'1~X ~ ::J u... P'1 z :Cu..."",~ a::ï=iu...L:J w ,~ ~ z V? v, 0 ~ ::JV) a:: u... 0 <[ u..."<t"::;: w 1-fC)I--¡:::::t:t ~MW ~ W W ""'"<t"-lZ "":::::;u...1-I a:: v,................. <:: =LnC\J:::E M"", '-' " , ' " " , " , , " ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , " , , , , " ' , -...I ~ z <:: P'1 L:J Z ~ a:: 1 <[ ......J W >-< P'1 <:: f- :::E W 0 ~ f- "<t" ~"'" f- >- V? 0 f- >-......J f- P'1 ::J -l¡:::q ....... f- ::J Z P'1:::E -l Z :::Ew .......0 >- ~ ~ W w"", xP'1 W L:J U V?"", MXMèj ~ Z D V?<J: <[ ......J <J: w...... a:: ......J .......:cl:c w-l I ru a:: ::;: ru"""V? -lu... W D ~t',.,/,)-V1 -l V? ......J ¡:::q W ......J ..-."'~~ D- "'" W :::E D- ....0...................("1") >-< -.¡- :::E ~("")......... = >-< V? M V? ~ "'" -.¡- , V? ...... -, w Z D U c¿ W U ::J ~ W c¿ V? V? "<t" = M ~ -.¡- , ....... ~ Z <J: P'1 a:: W V? ::J u... u... >-< ~ V? V? "<t" = M ~ "<t" , ...... ~ z <[ ¡:::q c¿ W ......J ......J W 0.... ::E ~ ~W ~ ......J a:: f- u... 0 Ln P'1co ......J - Z <[~I' J-i·W 8 X a:: Wf- <1:w <[ ~ 0.... :::E f- ~<[ 0....0 W f- L:J a:: ~ <[:C=:c ......Jf- 8 a:: ¡:::q >-< . ~ ::== ~ ~ r-. :::E Ma:: f-o.... ""'w <[a:: V?-l ~= V?-l WM wf-I' -'¡-o.... ~ =:::E ~(;J M >-< a:: L:J~¡:::¡ zDw ~Df- V?::==~V? ::Jf-Dw DW:::Ez :cw <1: ......J ~ L:Ju...f-> z a:: ~ruwV? a::,V?V? <[......z W ~-.¡- P'1...... = L:JM :::EXz~ D ~-.¡- f-P'1a::, f-V?<1:....... Du...w ¡:::q ¡:::qr-. '" -.¡- ......w....., V? ....., "'" Z:c """I1-I}-- "<t"f-c¿~ =~<1:::== M::==:::E ¡:::¡ W L:J Z <[ ......J u... V? V? "<t" = M ~ "<t" , ....... V? WV? ~ D"<t" Z = Z M <1:D Uf-V? f- 2!:i~w NW~ f- U "<t"-l<[ ruDa:: ::==P'1P'1 V? w~ ......Ja:: N<1: N::J DL:J Z:c wV? ~<1: <[a:: f-f- zP'1 ~u... ......JV? <1: V? 8 "'" f--.¡-w o....=z ~M>-< ......J~......J W""-<a:: W V?xf- V?'z ~w "<t"....-- ~ <[ a:: ¡:::q <[ f- a:: W ¡:::q CJ">D CJ"> a:: , Ln -- ......>- ,¡:::q Lnz -::== w<[ f-a:: ~~ '-' ....., Service Bid for Lift Pump Upgrade Ref. Quotation No.2 Description of Upgrade Modify existing pump to include new bowl assembly, new impeller, new intake bell, water lubricated bearing design spedfied in base bid. Modification of 18 inch, Axial flow, Stainless steel, Electric Pump IneIudes Stainless Steel water lubricated bowl assembly rated at 6,000 gpm at 4 ft. static head Taper Straightener band ImpelIer band Straightener vanes Straightener hub Four (4) Marine Bearings (mid bearing with stainless steel bousing and mounting spider ImpelIer Bottom Bearing Housing Bottom bearing gussets Thrust bearing Belts, sheaves and bushings Head plates 1 15/16 inch diameter Type 316 stainless steel shaft Packing gland Intake bell wi externally attached zinc plate Trashguard Pick-up and delivery Modification of existing pump wlout ext (Quotation No.2) ~ ! c=: W 1-", s; "" ~<I::3= ::0 C :z ::::i:¡::::;W w w <: ""'WZ "'" '" >"' w!:;ë= V') <: z L:J ""0 '" ~æJ::}-:3 - Z '" "",I- ~ <: ....J>-~'-'-w 0<: ...1- >- ;::::VJ...J~~~ 1-"'" VJ ~ >- "'" OW W l.éJ :J w Z~_V1¡:::¡W :0::0.. :::J -' z ",a <I: ~L.:..l:Z~ 0 L:J ~ ÇQ <: - - u < -;0 u zo.. >-......Iwz<I:t.-"] õ2f§>- z c¿ "'0 <: ë2"" (;)~¡::::¡:::Jv1 ....... ~ ...... 1-t.:...1- ::=:L:J w-, <:d t..1D ~a... u - Z >--, "'" Wz <I:~>=a...:z~l:i w>--=d <0.. < <:0 U ""- ....Jw"'ca-¡S:z -' '" u 0<::::J :0::...... :0:: t;) :;:¡-"'I...:J:J::: 52 w<:<: W L:J N Ww -J~::J w<C}-VJI-<t: Wu... ÇQc¿ Z "" _ CJ ::J "''''' > u~ ::::s::g ~....J......I"",¡;:ut.,¡J ZO N ....... z C2i= -J... a..~ W~ z '" 0<: 0 :::E:a...l:J' l::I:::&: ""...C::: .......c...u < - 0.."" ~:::E::Z:""I.:I:zc::::::J~...ot3C:::1- 1-:0:::0:: 0 W < >- "':::J-' I--Iœ:z :::r: w <: -,0 L...:=J¡::c."Jz¡::u ->8~ Xa..(;) 1-.......0 ÇQ >- <:u... a.."""~_"":)t:zM<t e::: «~ VJ 0 >-", !::wxw~xwc::l<c:ww= WWO uo..f- ::0 I- co Do 2......1 wZUJ.wz¡:::¡sB5>I-. --,--'I- .......w< 0.. VJ >-"" :::;¡~ ....J¡::: -lW _~w --'ªæ w....c¿f- :::;: ::J w<: a..W~....Ju..J~....J!:;:ë...oW::I:U <:WW Uo..° ::J >--' t::;v::> 0.. c¿ 0", :::I~D<C3c::J<u'~~:5 z"'- w:::;:::J :::r: ::Oz ~~::::s::I-C!xl-_[,()<I: a.. - <:--' o..::J0 I- 8<: ~;5w~<l:w~ê-::r:ow www a.~C:::.,....,¿e:::,....,__UI--a:: """"'''' VJ 0.. I I I I I I I I ÇQ f- ....... w.... ÇQ ....... -.J VJ VJ 1-...0 w........, <C"J t7<1- .......w.... w~<c :::r: ~...oVJ -.J'o.. Lf1 011 ...., L:J ....,1- L:J Z ....... 0<: < W ÇQ L:J WZo<: z.......W .......VJ;:::::¡ 0<: ::J ....... <coo.. :::;:...1-VJ Z o >- .......z -.J VJ:::;: ¡::::¡ z::J ~ w-.J ~ 1-0 W xu VJ W VJ < , 0 ;; :s ~----"~..J "- \ \ , \ , i , í , , / , , / , / // ...-- ..../' ------ r:::i Ú ::Ë w ....... U ::J -.J ¡...: VJ >- ;:::::¡ < 0<: ÇQ < l- e¿ W ÇQ D O'>e¿ 0'> '>- CD¡::::¡ , r--:z: w::3 I- <C <c æ: ;:::::¡ ;:::::¡ '-' '-' SerYice Bid for Lift Pump Upgrade Ref. Quotation No.3 Description of Upgrade Modify existing pump to include new bowl assembly, new impeller, new intake bell, water lubricated bearing design spedfied in base bid, with two (2) ft. extension. Modification of 18 inch, Axial flow, Stainless steel, E]ectric Pump Includes Stainless Steel water lubricated bowl assembly rated at 6,000 gpm at 4 ft. static head Taper Straightener band Impeller band Straightener vanes Straightener hub Four (4) Marine Bearings (mid bearing with stainless st~1 housing and mounting spider ImpeIIer Bottom Bearing Housing Bottom bearing gussets Thrust bearing Belts, sheaves and bushings Head plates 115/16 inch diameter Type 316 stainless steel shaft Packing gland Intake beII w / externally attached zinc plate Trashguard Pick-up and delivery Modification of existing pump w/ext (Quotation No.3) "" W I-VI e:¡ "" !;o:"":;. :::J Q Z I""W W Z W "" VlWZ 0< a VI W.!c::¡: V) ""z L:J >= VI ""0 VI ~a::!::I-~ :z - Z VI W 0<1- >-< "" --l::::-:::;r.l.J...W I- 0"" :r: >- ¡:::¡V'J...J:Épq~ x 1-0< V'J ~ I- 0< W OW W :::J ~ - w :Z~_V'J~W xc.. ~ --'z --' ~S <J: ~W:z~ VI 0 L:J ÇQ ""- Ü >-....JW:z<J:"", VI U Z <c -:;. "" Zc.. _0<>- 0<: 0<0 æVl "'~~::Jv5' ~ "'01- ...... ~ w.. ~L:J w--' ""<3 c..?CJ 1..:Ja... 0 I-w.._ Z 1---, "" Wz <~>=a..Z%l:rM t:>-¡:::: <co... <c ""0 u ""- ....1W""-oð-2:tZ.. --'''''u 0<::::J Xw.. x V') :3=1-""L.:1:I: õ2""'" W"""" W L:J "" Ww --' ¡::::::¡:::¡ W<I-"" 1-<"""" Ww.. ~O<: Z VI -c::J 0 =:J - WI ::¡: ¡:::::¡....J--l(/,¡:::QUW ~O< zOM > ...... Z æl- Xc.. I c..:;. W""X Z "" <c 0<: 0 l.=ï L:I~ "'...0::::: -a...U 80<:z <c - a..", Ox :zc..?L:JZ[:::JjSS",t:jO:::::f-c:t: t;j¿% W I- O<:::J :r: W "" --,0 w..c.. -""::z-U _>C::::¡V)_ _~.....J 1->-<0 ÇQ I- ""w.. I- _I-- :zM U~¡::::¡ Xa..V) <c<c>-< V? 0 1-0< t::W ~::aC!~::ac::::J ì5w§E.. WL.I.J[:::J Uo...l- :::J XW<t:XW <" CD l- e 00 z--' W:ZWW::z~_:::I:>I-_Z....J...J1- ......W<C 0... 1-"" :::J"" p: ~""'w .:E:....JP=I: LL..O<:I- ::;: V? W<>: X ....J ....Jl.L.J. ......W...,:::::<t:::E:O:::: :::¡ :::¡ 1---' c..w ~....JW~....J~....cW::::l:U...J--lI-WW Uo...D 0<: :::J VI O<æc::J<u'~:æ.:5<8""t:5~ W::;::::J 0... 0"" "" VI :r: :::J:z :::r::1-C!:::::E:J--VL<t. 0-1- 25<...J 0...:::¡C3 U"" W~<W~.ê-:I:J::IW~!::IWWW t- 8<>: -- V? 0... a..¡::::::¡O:::::_XO:::::___UI-O:::::_I-O:::::O:::::~ I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I- ...... LL.. ÇQ ...... -! V'J V'J I-~ LL......... <CM B5<c1- ......LL.. w~<c :r: 2S.~ V'J .....l'o.... Lncð ....... L:J .......1- z o >- ......z -! V'J:¡: ÇQ z:::¡ :¡: w-! W 1-0 V'J [ju V'J <c _ 0 ;> :~ þ---..-..J ....'\.. \ , , \ , \ , i , , I , ¡ , ,/ /' ~/~.. '. /- ~~------------ L:J Z ....... Q:: <c w p::¡ L:J W Z Q:: z......W .......V'J~ Q:::::¡ ...... <coo.... ::;: :r: V'J / , í , , I , \ , \ , \ , \, ''-'' ~ u ::E W >-- ~ <c 0<: p::¡ <c I- a:: W p::¡ o 0'>0<: 0'> '>- ::::ÇQ r--z w~ I- <c <c 0<: ~~ '-' "-' Service Bid for Lift Pump Ref. Quotation No.4 Description of Repair Repair existing pump bearings by installing marine bearings and zinc plate. Repair of 13 inch, Axial flow, Stainless steel, Electric Pump Includes Thrust bearing Mid Marine bearing Bottom Marine bearing Attached zinc plate Pick-up and delivery Repair of existing pump bearings (Quotation No.4) '-' -...I z a ~ >- <I: >- "" W W ~ >- I,;J a... L:J>=1 I,;J ~ z a -' :z:< -'z ~ 5;: <I:~ U '"' <I: "">- _Oe:: ~~ <I: Z W 0>- :::;:L:J ""0 "'- ~ ." "'-~ <0... w-, ~I,;J >-d >--, "" c¿::J <1:0 U I..:.JZW ""U ~Oe:: ::0:",- ::0: ""~z <1:<1: C< ~ L:J .... Ww -' w<t~w Wl.&... :z:0-.;¡- :z: UI (...? ZW<t-Q:: ..... Z 5;:>- :&: -¡:Q¿<a..Ô BOe:::z: CJ:::: 0 i:Ja...~f-::::r:..J::::r:~ ~ a..."" f-......O <I: >- æX~c..-'Jt::ICL:=J.....J <I:<I:..... W <I: -,0 l.&...=:I :::J J-u a... '" >- <1:"'- a..¡:::¡C::::l-z uo...f- ~ t::J >-"" t-w-::r::o_wo ""'W<I: ::::J 00 Z---l:E:-t=ONi%f1- u...0e::f- f- a >-." :;:1¡::Z:::¡ww~W%C:::: Uo...° V? w<l: a...f5uuwuww ::J >--' ::J"",<<:<:I:<""'> W::E::J c¿ 0"" ~",,-J.....J.....J-.Jc..-?_ Q...::J0 :r: ::::Jz U<I:Q...a...a..c...<I:-I V? 0... 8<1: __wwwwww f- c...~a::::o::::o::::c::::a:::.r::::I. I I I I I I I I ~ f- ..... u... ~- ....J L:j :z: - c¿ <I: W ~ W :z: ..... c¿ <I: :::;: ~ u ::;: W ..... W ::J ....J f- V? :::;: CJ f- f- CJ ¡::::¡ W ~ CJ z :z: <I: u :z: - N >- ~ <I: Oe:: ~ c¿ 0'> ...... -- 00>- ......~ r--z w:3' f- <I: <I: Oe:: ~~ '-' '-' Service Bid for Lift Pump Ref. Quotation No.5 Description of Upgrade Convert Creel oil-less design to base water-lubricated design. Conversion of 18 inch, Axial flow, Stainless steel, Electric Pump Includes Head Plate Packing Gland Mounting Plate Packing gland 115/16 inch diameter Type 316 stainless steel shaft Stainless steel mid-bearing housing with spider assembly and marine bearing Bronze straightener hub adaptor with two water lubricated marine bearings above impeIIer Pick-up and delivery Conversion of existing pump to water-lube (Quotation No.5) l.:)w Zl- ......<I: ::::¿-l ~c.. c.. _ l.:) (/) l- (/) :::¡: """ -...I r-.. "" l.:) :z Z ..... <r '-'- ~ "" <r ,,:: ::::¿ :z ~ "'" ,.:.. L.) <: Vi "" - <I: ..J <: ;:¡. W L::J W c.. "" :z c:.: "" w => L::J - W <::I '" CD <- :z ..J "" ..... <: 2 - iî Cl.. ""0 , L::J "'" Cl.. <: - ("") 2 U .. "" "" ""..... - <: L::J <: "" 0<: ~ >- "" Cl..W ..... l.:5 W .....'" W u... L::J ..... 0 ""..... Z ""..J <::IW l.:J~ 0 ..J :z - ..J ",5 "" ¡;; => ..J ::o::Cl.. <:- ..J U '" ::I:W 0 z<I: -;:¡. - :z ,Cl.. => Cl.. U ......Ce: ::== c:.:<::I U - W '" <::I "";:¡; -"">- <: !;;:L.:i - ::==l.:) 0 W..J '-'- ..... '" ::I: w- c:.:o..... .......J L... ..J..... Zw .....L..._ <I:c.. W Ce: <r<::l "" <: Cl..;:¡; <: l.:5 ~> G1>-¿ Ce::=J I- ;:¡;L... ::I: S c:.: U ",,<=> ::I: 0 ..J "" U ~Ce: <I: In If') Ww ;:¡; "" "" -"" w<r<: -l '-" U::I: ..J <:2 '" "" C=;¡<r WL... z°ln w~ z 52<- "" "" W<r - '-""" c.. <::I "" ::I:G ...... - .....'" -lZ - Cl..æ ;:¡;a.L::J Ln % "'L::J Z "" 8Ce:z ..... -Cl..U ~ 1=1 <I: <: ..J<::I O:;:¡;Z ""L::J - ""'l:JWa; .....%% 1-......0 <I: <I:-l ..... <:L... ""=>- "'Z - ""ZNO! ""=>..J <I:<I:...... <::I '-'-Cl....... - XC-v] W 1-l.:J => .....'" "" ;:¡."'" ;:¡. :>-Z< WW<::I Uc..1- :r: "" C3 o <::I .....W- WU W W~t::IW ......W<I: :=Jl.:J ....."" $E-IX Z<: Z ZWO::~ ..J..J..... u...Ce:1- 'Z W<: =>""W Cl.. ",,"" -I~a::: Uc..° "" .......J ~~W ..J", ..J ..J W "" ~~ -IW...J¡æ <:WW <::I"" <;!'" ..J t:;v:r> W:::¡::=J <I: ::::¿ =>",> <r <:z:......Ja::: ...... U =>Z "",,,,,0 ....."" ..... ~-<<r Z"'- c..:=JC "" <I: S<: u<:% ""Z "" (.o')a:::~X _ <: ..J ""c.. = __W <r"" WWW as<: Z as:&: ~CU ("") "" c.. Cl.."" "" - ""c:.:"" I I , I I I I I I I ¡:::¡ I- ...... u... p:¡ ...... -l "" "" 1-", u......-< <I: ("") B5<I:1- ~u... W¡:::¡j§ ~",,,,, -l~c.. In<<S "'-<l.:) ...-<1- l.:)' Z ~ 0<: <I: l.:) W Z 0<: p:¡~w ""~ W:::J...... ZOc.. ......:r: "" 0<: <I: "" "" :::¡:"""" g ~ :::¡: W ...... U :=J -l ~ (/) "" l.:) Z ...... 0<: <I: W 1=1 W Z ~ 0<: <I: :::¡: >- ~ <I: Ce: p:¡ - ,1=1 r---Z W:::::: I- <I: <:I: æ: 1=1 ¡:::¡ '-' ....." Service Bid for Lift Pump Ref. Quotation No.6 Description of Repair Labor and Component replacement costs for maintenance of base water-lubricated pump design. Repair of 18 inch, Axial flow, Stainless steel, Electric Pump Includes Tear-down and reassemble Quotation 6A Replace top thrust bearing Quotation 6B Replace aU Fleetwood Marine bearings Quotation 6C Replace attached zinc plates Quotation 6D Replace 115/16 inch diameter Type 316 SS shaft Quotation 6E Replace packing gland Quotation 6F Replace impeUer Quotation 6G Replace blades on impeUer Quotation 6H Replace fasteners Quotation 6I Pick-up and delivery Quotation 6J Component replacement of water-lube pump (Quotation No.6 - Cumulative Total Cost) '-' l.:J 2 '-' ~ <I: W ¡::Q l- V? :::J ~ :::r: I- W I- 2 W 2 o 0... :::E o U --' <I: :::J ..oJ'=!'" '-' W 2>8 0'-'> ,-,J'=! 1-2~ <t:.......w b~w :::J0~ cu...o W U '-' ~ 0... W I- o :::J C ...... J'=! 2 <I: --' l.:J l.:J 2 ....... ~ U <I: 0... -...I l.:Jtj~ ~ W 22 0 I- W ,~ --' ....... '-' 2 , . --' ;:::; ~~2~ --' ~ ¡::Q<t:<t:<I:<t: w w :::EWW :::r:J'=!0... 2 b;¡::Q¡::QuV?2:::E W >-"" 2W<I:'-' I- ~<t:t;;WÑ::Z:--'::z: ~ WW:::J::Z: ,-,l.:JO u... ~~~Q22--'l.:J E5 --'J'=!:::r:<I:OV)2""--'W W::z:I-:::E V?.......W--'V) ~ I- 'v'J'=!W .......<l:a..--'--'..oU<t:a..--' J'=!::z:O--' 0....... <t:--':::E--' 2:::;. 1-<1: ¡::QMCL¡::Q,-, <t: <t:OWWWWWWWW CLJ'=!UUUUUUUU :::J <t:<I:<t:<I:<I:<I:<I:<I: ~~--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--' U<t:a..o... CLa..o...a..o... 0... ......WWWWWWWWW CLI-~~~~~~~~ I I I I , I , I W l.:JJ'=! ::z:<t: .......a:: :::;.l.:J <t:o... a:::::J J'=!a::..o ::z:O:z o a:: 0 ...... ............. 1-<t:1- <t:CL<t: UWI- ......a::O Þ :::J uCLC W:::E 0...:::J V)CL J'=!I- ....... u... ¡::Q '-' --' ~ l.:J 2 W ...... ~ --' ~ --' <I: U W W ::;:: a.. ¡::Q l.:J :::E W W 2 ...... ....... :z '-' u ....... ~ :::J --' <t: --' W ;-: ¡::Q "" W ::z: ...... ~ <t: :::E l.:J >- :z ...... J'=! ~ <I: <t: ~ W ¡::Q ¡::Q W <I: ::z: I- ...... ~ a:: <t: w W :::E J'=! ¡::Q 0 G'> 0 2 G'> ~ ::z: " <I: Ln - ......>- U ,,¡::Q ::z: Ln::z: ...... W:::;. N I- <I: <t: a:: J'=! J'=! '-' -' Cumulative Quotation Summary New Pumps Base Bid Amount (Quotation No.1 Ref. Assemblies 1-4) Sub-total New Repairs Modification of existing pump w/out ext (Quotation No.2) Modification of existing pump w/ext (Quotation No.3) Repair of existing pump bearings (Quotation No.4) Conversion of existing pump to water-lube (Quotation No. 5) Component replacement of water-lube pump (Quotation No.6 - Cumulative Total Cost) Sub-total Repairs Grand Total '-' ...., 810, RFP & RFQ REQUEST FORM This form must be filled out and attached to the technical specifications or scope of work supplied by the requesting department. Ar1y missing information may delay the bidding process, The technical specification or scope of work must be sent to the Purchasing Department in a data file in WordPerfect format. Project Name and Description Purchase and Annual Maintenance of an IS Inch Diameter. 6.000 GDm at 4 Ft. Static Head. Axial Flow. Stainless Steel. Electric Lift Pump Requesting Department Mosquito Control Project Manager or Contact Person James R. David Phone Number 561-462-1692 Fax 561-462-1565 Date Submitted December 6. 2000 Requested Bid Opening Date January 17.2000 (If the funding for this bid was specifically approved in the budget anow two weeks for advertisement. If permission" to advertise is required allow 3-4 weeks. Bids less than $500,000 require a minimum of 21 days from advertisement to opening and bids in excess of $500,000 require a minimum of 30 days.) Insurance and bond information. BONDS A. Yes 0 No X 5% Bid Security B, Yes 0 No X 100% Maintenance Bond years C, Yes 0 No X 100% Public Construction Bond (This requirement may be waived by the County Administrator if the project is less than $200.000, attach memo confirming waiver.) INSURANCE The following are the standard limits fer County projects. Any request to deviate from these limits must be submitted in writing to the Risk Manager. The submittal must contain a description of the project and reason for the deviation. A. Yes X No o Worker's Compensation $1,000,000 by accident - each accident $1,000,000 by disease - each employee $1,000,000 by disease - policy limit 8, Yes X No o Commercial General Liability '-' -...I $1,000,000 per occurrence $3,000,000 per job aggregate C. Yes X No 0 Commercial Auto Liability Combined Single Limit, Bodily Injury/Property Damage o $300,000 o $1,000,000 o $3,000,000 D. Yes 0 No x Builder's Risk (all risks for the total construction cost of the project) E. Yes 0 No x Professional Liability $1,000,000 aggregate F. Yes 0 No 0 Other Pre-bid meeting Yes 0 No 0 Best time and day of week Mandatory Yes 0 No 0 Place Bid form information (unit pricing, break-out pricing, etc.) attach additional sheet if necessary The District reserves the rioht to either award the bid to the combined low auotations for all repairs and new pumps.· or separatelv for the repairs and the new pumps. The bids are proposed to be extendable for UP to three vears subiect to Board approval of annuallv renewable contracts Approval Budget item request # Annual Repairs Budaeted/New pumps Pendina Grants And Permits For Bear Point Mitiaation Bank Board Approval Date September 14.2000 Fund # 145-6230-546000-600 and 145-6230-564000-600 (Grant or Mitbank) · "'" 'wi Special requests or Instructions: A two vear warranty is required for all new pump bids. The repair bids are subject to standard gO-dav warranties aqainst defects in materia is and workmanship. . '-' '-....I . Suggested Potential Vendors Representative Company Address Phone/Fax # Kevin Quality Pump Systems, 1010 County Road Fax: (863)699-9301 SchriefeIs, Inc. 731, Sales Rep. Venus, FL 33960 Off.: (863)699-9300 Robert A. D & J Machine, Inc. 728 E. Trinidad Fax: (941)983-6508 Brady Ave., Clewiston, FL 33440 Off.:(941) 983-3171 , I . ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY"'" EROSION DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson District 4 Cliff Barnes District 5 AGENDA January 9, 2001 1. MINUTES A. Approve the minutes of the meeting held December 12, 2000. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 11, No. 12 and No. 14 " There will not be a Warrants List No. 13 for the Erosion District. 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Change Order No. 1 / Stewart Mining Industries / Geo-Tube Project Consider staff recommendation to approve the Change Order not to exceed $30,000 for Stewart Mining Industries to deliver additional beach compatible fill to South Jetty Park, and authorize the Chairman to sign the Change Order. B. Amendment NO.1 /Project Agreement 98SLl /Budget Resolution No, 01-01 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the amendment to the Project Agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection allocating additional state funds in the amount of $115,880, authorize the Chairman to sign the amended agreement, and approve the budget resolution to appropriate and expend the funds. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any parLy to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie Count'}' Community Services r..'i<mager at (561) 462- I?i? or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' ....., ." .- " ;. ..~ .. . EROSION DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: December 12,2000 Tape: 2 Convened: 11 :16 a.m, Adjourned: 11: I 7 a.m. Commissioners Present: Vice Chair, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes, absent Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director, Ray Wazny, Public Work Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Don West, County Engineer, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk I. MINUTES It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held November, 21, 2000; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com, Bruhn, to approve the Consent Agenda to include A- I; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1, Warrant List The District approved Warrant List Nos. 8 through 10. 2. Public Works A, Professional Engineering Services for Coastal Engineering RFP No. 00-062- The District approved the Consultant Agreement with Taylor Engineering, Inc" and authorized the Chairman to execute the agreement. B. Professional Engineering Services for Coastal Engineering RFP No, 00-062- 111e District approved the Consultant Agreement with Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. and authorized the Chairman to execute the agreement. C. Work Authorization for Coastal Engineering ServicesIDesign & Permitting ofGeo Tubes/South Jetty Park- The District approved the work authorization with Taylor Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $40,278 authorized the Chairman to execute the work authorization and approved the budget for permit fee(s) which are estimated at $12,000. D, Contract Extension- The District approved extending the contract with Marlowe & Company for the period beginning January 1,2001 and ending December 31, 200lfor a -1- '-' -...I flat monthly fee rate of $2,909 ($24,000 total - includes professional services and out of pocket expenses);ahdaiíthõ;ized the Chairman to execute the contract to continue coordinating beach efforts in Washington, D.C. and with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. ADDITION A-I '" ENGINEElUNG- Emergency Contract- The District approved declaring an emergency, waive the bid proèess and award a contract to Stewart Mining Industries, Inc., not to exceed $30,000 for beach compatible fill to be delivered to South Jetty Park and authorized the Chairman to execute the contract pending final review and approval by the County Attorney, There being no further business to be brought before the District, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court -2- 12/15/00 FZABYARR ...... LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD -...I YARRANT LIST #11- 09-DEC--2oo0 TO 15-DEC--20oo FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 4,817.94 4,817.94 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 ~ 12/27/00 FZABIIARR 'W: LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...., IIARRANT LIST #12- 16-DEC-2000 TO 22-DEC-2000 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 11,469.08 11,469.08 PAGE 1 PAYROU. 2,357.61 2,357.61 01/05/01 ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD -...I FZABIIARR liARRANI' LIST #14- 30-DEC-2000 TO 05-JAN-2001 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 6,244.20 6,244.20 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 2,318.77 2,318.77 ....... AGENDA REQUEST ....., ITEM NO. C-2A DATE: January 9, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1 with Stewart Mining Industries, to increase the quantity of beach compatible fill delivered to South Jetty Park for the Geo-Tube project, not to exceed $30,000. BACKGROUND: With the construction of the first two Geo-Tubes completed at South Jetty Park, further erosion has occurred along the southern shoreline where the remaining two Geo-Tubes are to be installed, In order to facilitate the installation of the remaining Geo-Tubes, additional beach compatible fill material will be required, Staff recommends Erosion District Board approval of Change Order No.1, not to exceed $30,000 (approximately 5,800 tons @ $5.10 per ton), for Stewart Mining Industries to deliver additional beach compatible fill to South Jetty Park, FUNDS: This project will not have any budgetary impact. FDEP has agreed to cost share this sand placement through an existing grant agreement (98SL 1) at 50%. Erosion District funds are also available in this grant. Funds will be made available in account nO.184203-371 0-563000-19008. PREVIOUS ACTION: November 21, 2000; Board approved contract with Underwater Engineering Services, Inc" to install 1 ,000 LF of Geo-Tubes immediately south of the Fort Pierce Inlet. December 12,2000; Board approved contract with Stewart Mining Industries for the delivery of approximately 5,800 tons of beach compatible fill to South Jetty Park, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Erosion District Board approval of Change Order No.1, not to exceed $30,000, for Stewart Mining Industries to deliver additional beach compatible fill to South Jetty Park; and authorize the Chairman to sign the change order. [x] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: D g sAnderson Co ty Administrator ~w [x]Originating Dept. Public Works -¡tL¡ . Coordination/Si natures [)<]Mgt. & BUd9~ ~ [x]Co. Eng e.f\8 [x]BudgetlRevenue Coord. €>~0- [xJCounty Attorney [ ]Finance Dept. ...... ...., CHANGE ORDER ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROJECT: Beach Compatible Fill (name, address) CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 INITIATION DATE: 12/19/00 TO (Contractor): CONSULTANrs PROJECT NO.: nla Stewart Mining Industries POBox 4332 Fort Pierce, FL 34948-4332 ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: COO-12-193 CONTRACT DATE: 12/12/00 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A - No) Beach Compatible Fill @ $5,10 per ton NOT TO EXCEED $30,000.00 The oliginal (Contract Sum) was ",.,"',.".."...,"'......."""'........."",...,,,'..... $30,000.00 Net change by previous authorized Change orders . . . , . , , . . . , , , , , , , . . . . . . . . , , , , . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . , . , . , , . . ., $-0- The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was ..,.,'...........",.,'......".,,'...,...,'.... $30,000,00 The (Contract Sum) will be (increased) by this Change Order . . . . . . . . . , , , , . . . , , , . . , , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , .. .. . . . , , . . , , , . . . . . , , , , , , . . . . . $30,000.00 The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be ,.""'..........""......."'.....,,,, $60,000.00 The Contract Time will be (unchanged) by.........""....,.,.....""........",.,...."".,... ( -0- ) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is: Funds Available: Account Number The adjustment in Contract Plice andlor Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall complise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the Contractor for the work or changes defined in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated plice and/or time adjustments include the costs and delays for all work contained in the Change Order, including costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or lipple effect on all other non- affected work under this Contract. Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract plice or time as a result of increases or decreases in costs and time of performance caused directly and indirectly from the Change Order. subject to the current scope of the entire work as set forth In the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor that the Change Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed. All work performed under this Change Order shall be performed in accordance with the contract specifications. Recommended: 51. Lucie County. Erosion Distlict ArchitecUEngineer 2300 Viroinia Ave.. Ft. Pierce. FL 34982 A~r!,ss n n , ~~ IZ-"lo-QJ By: Richard Bouchard, P.E. Date Agreed To: Approved: St. Lucie County. Public Works Department St. Lucie County Department 2300 Viroinia Ave" Ft. Pierce. FL 34982 Addre . Stewart Minino Industries Contractor Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 By: Date POBox 43~FL 34948 AddreS~ . ~ ) ~ JC}- OD By: Date /' Approved as to Form and Correctness County Attorney low' """" .., - - .~ - 0' ::. ,7' '" MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: December 12, 2000 Tape: 2 Convened: 11:15 a.m. Adjourned: I !:IS a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, John D. Bruhn, Doug Coward, Paula A. Lewis, Frannie Hutchinson, Cliff Barnes, absent Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Don West, County Engineer, Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager, Don Cole, Acquisitions Manager, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (2-2044) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the minutes of the meeting held November 21,2000; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. CONSENT AGENDA (2-0255) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. Warrant List The District approved Warrant List Nos. 8 through 10. 2. Mosquito Control Declaration of Surplus Property- The district approved the surplus equipment, grant authorization to offer the surplus equipment to interested Mosquito Control Districts at the values estimated and publicly auction the surplus equipment that is not successfully bid upon by another District. There being no further business to be brought before the District, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court -1- / ......, AGENDA REQUEST """ ITEM NO. C-2B DATE: January 9, 2001 - REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment No.1 to Project Agreement 98SL 1 with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, allocating additional state funds of $115,880, and approval of Budget Resolution #01-01. BACKGROUND: The Florida Beach Erosion Control Program (FBECP) is administered through FDEP and presently provides approximately $30 million annually to assist eligible local governments with their beach erosion control projects. This particular project agreement, Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration Project (98SL 1), was approved by the Erosion District Board on November 10, 1998 and included an allocation of state funds of $3,930,750 associated with beach restoration activities for both the 1.3-mile and 2.3- mile beach restoration projects. In the FBECP budget for FY-1999/00, an additional $115,880 in state funds were allocated to the permitting of the 2.3-mile beach restoration project. This request is to amend the existing project agreement with FDEP to add additional state funds ($115,880), Staff recommends the Erosion District Board approval of Amendment No.1 to Project Agreement 98SL 1. . FUNDS: Account No. 184203-3710-334391-300; FDEP Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration Grant. PREVIOUS ACTION: November 10, 1998: The Erosion District Board approved Project Agreement 98SL 1, Fort Pierce Beach Restoration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Erosion District Board approval of 1) Amendment NO.1 to Project Agreement 98SL 1 and authorize the Chairman to sign the amended agreement and 2) Budget Resolution #01-01. [x] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: [xJCounty Attorney [xlOriginating Dept. Public Works 7/'/, 0Y/ COOrdinatiOnlAS [x]Mgt. & Budget [xICo. Eng (I.M ¡ P#!!JØfif!¡.XIBudgeURevenue Coord. t-- ç.,~ [x]Finance Dept. ~ '-' ""' -...I ...., ~ RESOLUTION 01-01 , WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Erosion Control District's Budget, certain funds have become avaiiable from Florida Department of Environmental Protection in a form of a $115,800 addition to the Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration Grant. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the St. Lucie County Erosion Control District to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Erosion Control District of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 9th day of January, 2001 pursuantto Section 129.06 (d), Fiorida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated forthe fiscai year 2000-2001, and the Erosion Control District's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 184203-3710-334391-300 Dept. of Environmental Prot-Physical $115,880 APPROPRIATIONS 184203-3710-599330-300 Project Reserve $115,880 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn Commissioner Clifford Barnes Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2001. ATTEST: EROSION CONTROL DISTRICT ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPUTY CLERK BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY G:\BUDGE1\ WP\Resolutions\O¡·resol\I'9Eros 18420Jioß_ Grant.wpd '-' ~ -...I -....I ii , DEP Contract No, 98SL1 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OFFICE OF BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS FLORIDA BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM Project Agreement Amendment # 1 This AMENDMENT by and between the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (hereinafter referred to as the "DEPARTMENT") and St. Lucie County (hereinafter referred to as the "LOCAL SPONSOR"), serves to amend that Project Agreement between the DEPARTMENT and LOCAL SPONSOR dated November 3D, 1998, pertaining to the Ft. pierce Beach Restoration, (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT"). The DEPARTMENT and LOCAL SPONSOR hereby agree to the following changes and additions: Paragraph 5 of the PROJECT Agreement is hereby revised to read as follows, ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Nonfederal Eliqible PROJECT Items Federal State Local Credit .. Total 1. Permitting, Engineering, $300,000 $226,183 $226,183 $0 $752,366 and Design 2. Construction $4,338,820 $3,567,367 $3,567,367 $801,857 $12,275,411 3. Monitoring $46,720 $26,640 $26,640 $0 $100,000 4. Miti ation 397 120 226 440 226 440 0 850 000 TOTAL $5,082,660 $4,046,630 $4,046,630 $801,857 $13,977,777 *Note: The Non-Federal credit consists of previously expended state and local funds associated with the previous permitting, engineering, and design work. Paragraph 6 of the PROJECT Agreement is hereby revised to read as follows: 6. The DEPARTMENT has determined that 100% of the PROJECT length is eligible for state cost sharing. Therefore, the DEPARTMENT1s financial obligation shall not exceed the sum of $4,046,630 for this PROJECT or up to 50% of the non-federal PROJECT cost for the specific eligible PROJECT items listed above, whichever is less. The DEPARTMENT and the LOCAL SPONSOR agree that any and all activities associated with the PROJECT that are not shown in the above eligible PROJECT items listing are the responsibility of the LOCAL SPONSOR and are not a part of this Agreement. The LOCAL SPONSOR agrees that any costs for the specific eligible PROJECT items, which exceed the estimated PROJECT costs for that item, shall be the responsibility of the LOCAL SPONSOR. Ar.y modifications to the estimated PROJECT costs shall be provided through amendments to this Agreement. Pa~agraph 7 of the PROJECT Agreement is hereby revised to read as follows: 7. The State of Florida's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature. Funding for this PROJECT is subject to the release of funds appropriated to the DEPARTMENT for the fiscal year 1997-1998 and 1999-2000. The DEPARTMENT will not release funds for payment until such time as all requisite authorizations and environmental permits, including those required. pursuant to Chapters l61, 253, 258 and 373, Florida Statutes, have been obtained. Paragraph 21 of the PROJECT Agreement is hereby revised to read as follows: 21. Any and all notices shall be delivered to the parties at the following addresses: Page 1 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No, 98SL1, Amendment 1 '-' - -...I ...,,;I . , LOCAL SPONSOR Mr. Richard Bouchard, P.E. St. Lucie County Public Works Department 2300 Virginia Street Ft. pierce, Florida 34982-5652 (561) 462 -1710 DEPARTMENT Jacqueline Thompson Department of Environmental Protection Office of Beaches and Coastal Systems 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS 300 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 (850) 487-1262 Paragraph 23 of the PROJECT Agreement is hereby revised to read as follows: 23. In accordance with Section 216.349/ Florida Statutes (financial review of grants and aids appropriations), the LOCAL SPONSOR shall provide to the DEPARTMENT an audit of this Agreement in accordance with the rules of the Auditor General promulgated pursuant to Section 11.45, Florida Statutes. The DEPARTMENT reserves the ~ght to recover costs for failure to comply with Section 216.349, Florida Statutes. Copies of the required audit, shall be sent to each of the following within thirteen (13) months after completion of the LOCAL SPONSOR's fiscal year in which the Agreement was completed. Jacqueline Thompson Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS 310 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Aµdit Director Department of Environmental Protection 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS40 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 Audit Manager Office of the Auditor General P,O. Box 1735 Tallahassee, Florida 32302 To ensure compliance with section 216.349, Florida Statutes, Chapter 10.600, Rules of the Auditor General is provided as Exhibit "FI!. Although this document is provided as an attachment to this Agreement, tile LOCAL SPONSOR acknowledges that this rule is subject to periodic revision by the Auditor General, and as such, the LOCAL SPONSOR agrees to comply with the effective version of the rule at the time of satisfying the audit requirements of this Agreement. Exhibits A, B, C, and G are hereby revised and incorporated as attached. Exhibit G is hereby incorporated as attached, All other terms and conditions of that PROJECT Agreement dated November 30, 1998, remain the same. Page 2 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No, 98SL1, Amendment 1 "-' ......... '-....I ...., ¡ . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be duly executed, the day and year last written below. ST, LUCIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION By' County Commission Chair* By: Secretary or designee l Date, Date, ~~~~ o tact Man er APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: t~tort/ *If someone other than the County Commission Chair signs the project agreement, a resolution, statement or other documentation authorizing that person to sign the agreement on behalf of the County must accompany the agreement. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 3 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No. 98SL1, Amendment 1 '-' '-' '-' -...I . LIST OF EXHIBITS . A Scope of Work B Payment Request Forms C Progress and Financial Reporting Forms G Special Audit Requirements L Page 4 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No. 98SLl, Amendment 1 '-' ......, "-" ...." . EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK The PROJECT shall be conducted in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in any and all permits related to the project, and any other permits required for proper execution of the project. The PROJECT consists of the restoration and maintenance of the beach and dune system for 2.3 miles of Atlantic shorelirie between DNR Reference Monuments R34 and R47. Construction of the federally authorized shore protection project mitigates the effects of Fort pierce Inlet, implementing the State's Fort pierce Inlet Management Plan, Construction of the northern 1.3 miles of shoreline is scheduled during FY 98/99, The remaining 1.0 miles is proposed for construction in FY 00/01. 1. permitting, Engineeringt and Design Professional services required for the preparation of plans and specifications. These services include the use of subcontractors such as surveyors, 9¡otechnical services, aerial photographic services, property appraisers, etc. This item specifically excludes permit application fees or any other fees paid to the State of Florida. 2. Construction work performed and costs incurred associated with the placement of fill material within the project area. Eligible costs include mobilization. demobilization, beach fill, tilling and scarp removal. A detailed description of construction methods, specifications, and timelines, must be submitted to the Department and approved in writing prior to initiation of construction activities. Construction shall be conducted in accordance with any and all permits issued by the Department. 3. Monitoring A monitoring plan shall be developed consistent with the requirements specified in any and all permits issued by the Department. The plan shall consist of: 1. topographic and bathymetric profile surveys, 2. bathymetric surveys of the borrow area, 3. post construction sediment samples, 4. marine turtle nesting activity, and 5. compaction surveys. The monitoring plan must be submitted and approved in writing by the Department prior to the initiation of monitoring activities. The plan shall be developed in a manner which will coordinate the monitoring activities associated with current shoreline stabilization projects located within or adjacent to the project area. Project Deliverables A. Reports - Unless otherwise noted above, five copies of all written reports developed under this Agreement shall be forwarded to the Department upon completion of the project. B, Additional Data - Two sets of all data li,e" aerial photography, survey data, etc,} developed as a result of this Agreement shall be provided to the Department upon completion of the project. C. Schedules- Project schedules shall be submitted concurrently with quarterly progress reports and shall be provided in .MPP or tab delimited .TXT format. Information provided shall be the best available and shall represent the most accurate forecast of future events. Specific information to be included: tasks Page 5 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No. 98SLl, Amendment 1 '-' ....... -...I ""'" to be completed, start and finish dates, task duration, actual start and finish dates with actual task duration. . D. A copy of the Bids and construction contract, including a detailed scope of work, sball be submitted to the DEPARTMENT prior to initiation of any task. Data Development All data developed as a result of this Agreement shall be developed in accordance with standard formats acceptable to the Department. Survey work to be performed shall meet the minimum technical standards for surveys in accordance with Chapter 61G-17, Florida Administrative Code. All rnonumentation set or points of origin established shall be based upon those control markers designated on the most recently recorded legal description of the Coastal Construction control Line, except that any First or Second Order federal or state horizontal control marker may be used to establish or confirm position and direction and any First, Second, or Third Order federal or state vertical control marker shall be used to establish or confirm elevation. G.P.S., Traverse, and Level Loop information shall be adjusted by Compass, CrandellL or Least Square Method. Detailed field notes and computation records shall be kept of the survey and copies shall be made available to the Department upon request. Abstracts of all monurnentation or points of origin shall be submitted in digital form and contain at a minimum all field requirements for the Department's Monument Information Tracking System. All profile data shall be submitted in digital form and conform to the standard formats acceptable to the Department. All information submitted shall also be in electronic format, and shall be based on the 1983/1990 North American Datum and State Plane Coordinate system. This information shall be submitted in a .DXF format. Page 6 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No, 98SL1, Amendment 1 '-' '- EXHIBIT B PAYMENT REQUEST FORMS ...., -...I Page 7 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No. 98SL1¡ Amendment 1 L '-' '-' -...I .oJ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FLORIDA BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PAYMENT Name of Project: Ft. pierce Beach Restoration Grantee: St. Lucie County DEP Contract Number: 98SL1 Billing Number: Billing period: costs Incurred This Payment Request Total Cost Local Share State Share Federal Share contractual L Cos t Sununary State Funds obligated $4.046.630 Local Funds Obligated $4.046.630 Less Previous Payment Less Previous credits Less This Payment Less This Credit Less Retainage (10%) Less previous Retained State Funds Remaining ~ocal Funds Remaining Certification: I certify that this billing is correct and is based upon actual obligations of record by the grantee; that payment from the State Government has not been received; that the work and/or services are in accordance with the Department of Environmental Frotection, Bureau of Beaches and Coast~l System's approved Project Agreement including any amendments thereto; and that progress of the work and/or services are satisfactory and are consistent with the amount billed. Name of project Administrator Signature of Project Administrator Date Name of Project Financial Officer Signature of Project Financial Officer Date Page 8 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No. 98SL1, Amendment 1 '-' ......, ......" ...., FLORIPA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FLORIDA BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Name of project: Ft. pierce Beach Restoration Grantee: St. Lucie County DEP Contract Number: 9BSLl Billing Number: Billing period: Summary of Invoices Date of Invoice Amount of Invoice Number Invoice Name of Vendor Task .JL Check Number Amount Paid Vendor t. - .- TOTAL $ Certification: I certify that the purchases noted above were used in accomplishing the project; and that invoices, check vouchers, copies of checks, and other purchasing documentation attached hereto and are maintained as required to support the cost reported above and are available for audit upon request. Name of Project Administrator Signature of Project Administrator Date Name of Project Financial Officer Signature of Project Financial Officer Date Page 9 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No, 98SL1, Amendment 1 '-' ~ -...I ...., EXHIBIT C PROGRESS AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FORMS Page 10 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No. 98SLl, Amendment 1 '- '-' ...... 'wi --' FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FLORIDA BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT Name of Project: Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration Grantee: St. Lucie County DEP Contract Number: 98SLl Quarterly Report period: status of Eligible Project Items: (Describe progress accomplished during report period. including statement(s) regarding percent of task completed to date. Describe any implementation problems encountered, if applicable.) 1. Permitting, Engineering, and Design '- 2. Construction 3. Monitoring 4. Mitigation Page 11 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No, 98SLl, Amendment 1 '-' ....... '-...I ...." FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FLORIDA BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM . QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT Name of Project: Ft. pierce Beach Restoration Grantee: St. Lucie Count v DEP Contract Number: 98SLl Quarterly Report period: Project Expenditures Eliqible proiect Items Costs Incurred This Quarter Costs Incurred to Date Total Funds ObliQated Planning, Engineering, And Design $ ~ 752.366 construction $ 12.275.411 Monitoring $ 100.000 Mitigation $ 850.000 Page 12 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No. 98SLl, Amendment 1 - - - EXHIBIT G SPECIAL AUDIT REQUIREMENTS Page 13 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No, 98SL1, Amendment 1 L ....... ...... ...., ...., non-Federal and non-State funds (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from recipient funds obtained from other than Federal/State entities) . PART II: STATE GRANTS AND AIDS 1. This part is applicable if the recipient is a local government or a non-profit or for profit organization as defined in Chapter 10.600, Rules of the Auditor General. 2. In the event that the recipient receives more than $25,000 in State grants and aids in its fiscal year¡ the recipient must have a limited scope audit conducted in accordance with Section 216.349, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 10.600, Rules of the Auditor General. EXHIBIT 1 to this Attachment indicates State grants and aids amounts awarded through the Department of Environmental Protection by this agreement. In determining the grants and aids received in its fiscal year, the recipient shall consider aggregate grants and aids received directly from State agencies, including grants and aids funds received from the Department of Environmental Protection. The audit report must include an auditor's examination attestation report, management assertion report (alternatively, managernentls assertion may be included in the management representation letter), and a schedule of State financiat assistance. EXHIBITS 2, 3, and 4 to this Attachment provide examples of these report~/schedule. The auditor's examination assertion as to compliance material respects: attestation report must indicate whether management's with the following requirements is fairly stated, in all · activities allowed or unallowed · allowable costs/cost principles · matching (if applicable) · reporting 3. In the event that the recipient receives State grants and aids totaling $25,000 or less in its fiscal year, the head of the recipient entity or organization must provide a written attestation, under penalty of perjury, that the recipient has complied with the allowable cost provisions (or other applicable provisions) of the State grants and aids contract. EXHIBIT 5 to this Attachment provides an example attestation document that should be used by the agency head to attest to compliance with grants and aids provisions. PART III: REPORT SUBMISSION 1. Copies of audit reports for audits conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and required by PART I of this Attachment shall be submitted, when required by Section .320 (d), OMB Circular A-133, as revised, or when required by number 2 below, by or on behalf of the recipient directly to each of the following' A. The Department of Environmental Protection at each of the following addresses: Jacqueline Thompson Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Beaches and Coastal Systems 3900 Commonwealth Blvd" ms 300 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Audit Director Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Inspector General Page 15 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No, 98SL1, Amendment 1 "-" "-" ...., """" Audi t Di rector Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Inspector General 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS40 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 B. The Office of the Auditor General at the following address: Audit Manager Office of the Auditor General P.O. Box 1735 Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1735 4. Copies of reports or management letters required by PART III of this Attachment shall be submitted by or on behalf of the recipient directly to: A. The Department of Environmental Protection at each of the following addresses: Jacqueline Thompson Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Beaches and Coastal Systems 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., ms 300 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 L Audit Director Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Inspector General 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS40 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 s. Any reports, management letters, attestations I or other information required to be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection pursuant to this agreement shall be submitted within 180 days of the recipient's fiscal year end (or as otherwise allowed by Florida Statutes) or within 30 days of the recipient's receipt of the audit report, whichever occurs first. Other submissions should be timely in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and/or Florida Statutes, as applicable. 6. Recipients¡ when submitting audit reports to the Department of Environmental Protection for audits done in accordance with OMB Circular A-133¡ should indicate the date that the recipient received the audit report in correspondence accompanying the audit report, PART IV: RECORD RETENTION The recipient shall ensure that audit working papers are made available to the Department of Environmental Protection, or its designee, upon request for a period of 3 years from the date the audit report is issued, unless extended in writing by the Department of Environmental Protection. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 17 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No. 98SLl, Amendment 1 0 . 0 q< s:: 0 ..-< .w U " en >, .Q '0 " I-< -.-< " tJ' " I-< " Z H :<0 0 "" "" 0 r.. '" :I: E-< r.. 0 E-< en H en Z M 0 C> U E-< Z E-< '" H :;:: '" '" H '" ~ <>: " '" <>: en H :I: E-< 0 E-< E-<- ~1J ::0 ~ U)-.-< <>: > ::0 " " I-< E-< ~ Z '" '" H " ,., H ,., U "" '" , <>: <>: '" I-< :I: '" E-< H " 0 U E-< I-< ,.-< OU '" 0'" ~ð :<0 <>: U) "" 0 5:{1 r..- ,-,-- ~ g~ ... -.-I.- Q) s:: ... "" It! to rei ~.a ><'1:> ,.-< i'; '" t) -rl ~ U IV ~ 0. ~..- .¡.J~Ovrl It! ~.¡.J 0.. .w o..ltI 0.. en ~u n:I ... s:: " 0 ~ '" s:: ,~ '0 s:: " r.. " " U s:: H 0 "" " ..-< ... 0... ,~ H U) " E-< o Q"I"ri ;;: s:: I-< .,..¡ ~ U) '0 " U § 0 '" .... "" " 0 '" U (TIIV·.-I @ ~ O.wU,,-,{¡ ,....¡ It! 1: to ItS ~ ê -,..( ;:I .w ..., VI Z B t>..~ I-< '" " " '" "-' "''''' ... '" U) U m ,~ '" " U H " 0 U) '" s:: ,.-< '0 s:: " '" - " E ~ ...¡ C"I rc Q.) Q) 4 ... H {¡.c:'~ '" m ...-0 "-' 0;::10 c: U) ~Z-:::I Po '" U s::.... ... .S ..-1 " s:: ... "" It! to It! ',Q ...¡ "t:!.,..¡ >. ct! D·.... ~ $..I U Q) ø:;( 0.. g,..... .u ~ 0 Q) rl ItS ).....) 0. ..J o..«so. en ~U It! ... s:: " 0 ~ '" s:: ,.-< '0 s:: " '" " "" ... ,~ E-< '" 0 '" U I-< '" " ~{¡ U" Z >- U s:: " '" '" .-< '" I-< " -0 " '" .-< 5 H '" '" " H H,Q " "'5 -0 o " " 1;:z '" i ... -:'1i,.~ " f$, ',. >, .Q '0 " I-< ,.-< g. " I-< ~~. ::£;, '0 I-< '" 3 <>: H '" .w o E-< ...., ...,.; Q) .c: .w s:: -.-< .... " 0 '0 U Q) s:: Q) .Q '" p. .,-t J,J 0 I-< ~ U u·,..¡ to ~ ~ Q) ~ '0<>: U) :<0 o "" "" o r.. en <>: '" ~ .w U '" ~ HI-< .w '" .w ~ -,.. s::::: 11) U 0 .w e s::::: u u Q) '" '" .. s::::: 4J ...j -,-i -.-i ..c:: .µ ~rx...,.JS::::: tJ' 0 (J QJ s::::: U H +J .r-i '" Q) e.w'd..c:: ns (J) QJ +J I-< '0 01~ ::I s::::: o 0 .-t...... I-, >, I-< H ,.....¡ 0 QJ ¡..¡ p,¡ r-I .Q rei e r.. Q) o OH U Q) .µ U .c: .-{ JJ QJ to .--i )....¡-,...¡ '" I-< '" .c: 0 .w to......... m s::::: '0 '0 Q) .u s::::: s:::::.,....¡ s:: CCS ;j p.. (J If-<..-I ..-1 __ U O,¡,:t Q) Q) .,...¡ Q..c:: H ur...w "U Q) H-..c::..c: U .w Q) QJ-r-( ..c:: u..c >. ,µ s::: :3 .0 '" ~..J ... 'd Q) UJ 0 Q) >.,...¡ ~ H o t1J .,...¡ .0 tIJ {) ::J '" <>: "tJ< ~ " "d U 0 H QJ -..-I P. -..-I.J H..c: I,.. tn ;::I U -rl QJ c...u .wS.........ctI s::: 0 [f E Q) 0 Q) '0 u>, ';~'E;¡ '" 01 Q) I-< 0 ~ O1H -'" o rtI IV µ H .w ..c: 0 0. '" E-< 3 U ...... .c: ~ U H " rom_U Q) H 4::...-1 Q) U) > )...<'"d µ. 1-4 o Q.) U Q) r..r.. ~ E-< Z '" :;:: '" '" <>: ~ en H :I: E-< o E-< o '" o ~ .. :<0'0 <>: Q) ~ U) -.-< ~ ~ r.. " '" '" :I: E-< ,., 0'" E-<.-< , "'<>: "" ~n UH H " "" U " I-< p,. .~ <>:U u)'" E-<:;:: zo '" :;:: '" <>:N H- ::0- 0'0 '" <>: o "'0 Uq< ~ s:: H 0 "",.-< " .w :;:: U o Q) UU) S::HH o '" '" -..-I .. H .w Q) Q) U'C'C Q) Q) Q) .wr..r.. o ' I-< Q) s:: "HO .Q s:: H '" '" U Q) .µ '.-1 ..c: S::H.w Q) p. e p..... s:: '" 0 o I-< Q) ,.-< .c: ~ .w '" I-< o ........ o >, I-< o 01 " " .w.w s:: '" " U o e " '" ,~ .c: .w " .w .w .w s:: s:: s::::: QJ H Q) (1) H Q) e E " '0 ..J Q)I,.. ¡:: H H If-< ::I ~'~~'CL "tJ< " OQJO.w I-< .w " Q) -.-< ..s:: cv s::: r-I .µ..c:: .r-i .w '" >, .w .0 ... H U 0Q).w 'd ... c.. Q.) " I-< 'd.,....¡ () -r-i E....J M :> s:: o >, " H cO EN p. e Q) I-< UI tIJ·..-I....-I '0 .w " s:: s:: tJ' " " " I,.. E ¡...¡ QJ " 01 ... .w -.-I S:::::.,., s::: -rl ;j QJ ..c: t::r' ...¡ 01 U QJ QJ ~ JJ J.4 t.... -..-I '" .... p. E QJ 0..-1 ::J .c:'C0 .w.w I-< ~ .w01 " s:: '" tIJ QJ;:::: Q.) Q);::::....J~ I-<.w 0 0. .w Q.) .. s:: s:: }.... tIJ Q) rtI E.w.c: (I ctS X J,.J '0 I-< Q) s:: 01 " ::J 0 Q.) J.4 t....J.4;::::O p..w E E as ~ 0 QJ )..¡ctSJJ.Q 011-< o Q) >, )..¡ 'd 0 ("[ 0.. QJ u E r..H " <>: Q) .w s:: I-< m 0"" Q.) .w '" .c: en.w .w I-< " " .c: U .w I-< .... 0 H .... '" Q) '0 .,.f .¡J ¡:: > ~ ~ .w -"'''' <>: ~ ~ ~·ã U 0 s:: ~ ~ "'.... Q) 0 Po U.... s:: '" '" '" .w 0 .w '" .. U Q) ..- ~ H 0" «I tJlt'J «I I-< s:: 4)·ri 4) H 'C'O.c:O 4) H .¡J I¡..{ ~ ~ ~ E It¡.. 4) 0 J,..J o ~ It¡.. ;:::: ",s::~.Q o O.,.c 0 r-t"TiœX IØ .µ ... Q) .w '" - ð ~ n .., 0 G.I '..-1 ... ~ ~): ~ .~ .µ QJ .¡J" ...-1 > I-< " > o "" .w s:: " E '0 s:: " ~ M "" U) '" '" o Z .w s:: " E Q) " I-< 01 <>: tJI ~ : s:: 0 Q) :å rs. u k U '" '" ~ . 'd 0 ~ rei r-t () '0 " .... 0 U) u.c: " .. .w U " 'n o I-< " " '" o s:: o -ri:> .--i .µ 0 JJ 4-< '" ~ ~ "" .,;.~ .w O..J::: Po. ro ~;:::: -r! J,..J -r! 'd ~ (I m w ~ 0 mOltS Q) ~ " " ~ N N .... o '" "" " 01 '" " 3 ;( ~ :>. æ «I ..0" ¡¡ " E '" I-< ~ 01'0 o ~ I-< " p..... .w " .w u.c: s:: '" ... .w '" .. -.i'C ... .. " Q) ...w s:: <>: ~ ~ ~ r-I g E-t ~ «I r-t s:: -~ H"'" ~ " '" '" '" 8 Q) ¡:: 'd O.t:: -r! ? Z J,..J Þ4 ~ .w.w ¡:.w Q).c: 'M p..w -.-< '" U " k "" ~ ....., ...,.¡ EXHIBIT - G2 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON EXAMINATION OF MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION ABOUT COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS (SAS Codification Section AT 500.55) [Date] Dear (Name] We have examined management' 5 assertion1 about (name of enti ty] I S compliance with the allowable cost requirements [or other applicable requirements] established in the grant agreement(s) applicable to the State grants and aids appropriations identified on Schedule of State Financial Assistance for the year ended [indicate the applicable fiscal year] included in the accompanying [ti tle of management report]. J Management is responsible for aJname of entity] 's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management 1 s assertion about the [name of enti ty] 's compliance based on our examination. Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about [name of entity] 's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on [name of entity] IS compliance with specified requirements. In our opinion, management's assertion example, that complied during the fiscal year ended respects.3 4 [identify management's assertion - for wi th the aforementioned requirements is fairly stated, in all material Sincerely, Notes: 1. If the entity does not present its assertion in a separate report accompanying the practitioner's report, refer to SAS Codification Sections AT 500.56 and .57. 2. The practitioner should identify the management assertion report examined by reference to the report title used by management in its report. Further, he or she should use the same description of the compliance requirements as management uses in its report. 3. The specific compliance requirements, and related criteria (if applicable), will be specified and/or referred to in the grant agreement. As such, it should not be necessary to repeat the compliance requirements, and related criteria (if applicable) in the practitioner's report. 4. Instances of noncompliance should be reported in the manner prescribed in SAS Codification Sections AT 500,61 through .68. Page 19 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No, 98SL1, Amendment 1 '-" --- '-' ..".; EXHIBIT - G3 MANAGEMENT ASSERTION REPORT (head of recipient entity) I hereby assert that, (recipient entity name) I, complied with allowable cost requirements [or other applicable requirements] of the grants and aids appropriations identified on the attached Schedule of State Financial Assistance during the fiscal year ended (month, day, year) (signature) L (title) (date) If this assertion report is used, one copy shall be submitted after the recipient's fiscal year end to each of the parties designated in the contracts/grants for the identified grants and aids appropriations, This statement does not need to be notarized. Page 20 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No, 98SLl, Amendment 1 ...... ---- 'wi ""'" ! . EXHIBIT - G4 Sample Organization Schedule of State Financial Assistance For the year ended 9/30/97 State Federal Federal State Contract/ CFDA Number Through Agency And Grant Note A State State Total Program Number Receipts Receipts Receipts Title Department of Health Head Start GH50l 93.600 50,000 (1) 50,000 (1) 100,000 Women, ABlOl 93.245 100,000 (1) 150,000 250,000 Infant & Children l Department of Elder Affairs Community GC501 Not 200,000 (1) ° 200,000 Care for Applicable the Elderly Community GC60l 93.003 0 150,000 (1) 150,000 Care for the Elderly Elder Care GC777 93.666 60,000 60,000 120,000 Total 410,000 410,000 (2) 820,000 (1) State Grants and Aids Appropriations moneys. The grand total of State Grants and Aids Appropriations moneys is $550,000. (2) $390,000 of this amount is included in the expenditures presented in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. The remaining $20,000 was received under contract number GC601 but was not expended. NOTE A: Federal CFDA numbers apply only to Federal programs. CAUTION: The purpose of this schedule is format illustration only. contract or grant numbers, CFDA numbers and progr~ titles are intended to represent actual data. The not Page 21 of 22 DEP Project Agreement No. 98SLl, Amendment 1 '-' -- -...I ...,., , . " EXHIBIT - GS .. MANAGEMENT ATTESTATION STATEMENT CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER(S) I, I hereby attest, under penalties of perjury, that, (head of recipient entity) complied with allowable cost requirements [or (recipient entity name) t. other applicable requirements] of the grants and aids appropriations contracts/grants identified above during the fiscal year ended (month, day, year) (signature) (title) (date) One copy of this attestation statement shall be submitted after the recipient t s fiscal year end to each of the parties designated in the contracts/grants for the identified grants and aids appropriations. This statement does not need to be notarized. Page 22 of 22 Contract No. 98SL1, Amendment 1