Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 04-10-01 ¥ .,¡ APRIL 10~ 2001 9:00 AM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBUC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M_ or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 AM., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 AM. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed Dfior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBUC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 AM., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 Or TOO (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ¥ ...,,; www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA April 10, 2001 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held April 3, 2001. AppíOv'cé'J 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATION A. Rudy Howard will introduce Wally Eccleston, Executive Director of the St. Lucie County Economic Development CounciL B. The Chairman will present a Letter of Appreciation to Ms. Ginger King for the donation by Lawnwood Regional and St_ Lucie Medical Centers for the South County Regional Stadium. Budget Resolution No. 01-86 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the sponsorship agreement, accept the $1,000 Corporate Sponsorship payment, and approve the budget resolution to appropriate and expend the funds. A-pDgovecl. C. Presentation - Mr. H. B. Holmes, Jr. of Higher Dimensions Community Development Corp. will discuss the Everglades Restoration Project. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA l"\'LLnct'5 C-2..1) (pUllLd pnorbH1t¡.) ihu1lA.S e-",i0 (pu.lltd PYW('tbM~,) A-p pro ý ed 4. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. My person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cro,ss..examine any indivld, ,..I testifying during a hearing upon request Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the Sl Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-elght(48) hours poo, to the meeting. "'" ...., REGULAR AGENDA APRIL 10, 2001 PAGE TWO PUBUC HEARINGS SA. There are no public hearings scheduled for April 10, 2001 End of Public Hearings 6. COUNTY ATIORNEY A. Ordinance No. 01-06 - Property Maintenance Regulations I Permission to Advertise - Consider staffrecommendation to grant permission to advertise the ordinance, and that the Board request that the Local Planning Agency Ð review the draf8Pß%ar~efOre the Board schedules its public hearing. B. Resolution No. 01-87 - Consider staff recommendation that the Board consider Resolution No. 01-87, titled A Resolution Requesting the State of iJvJ,L. :\ü Florida Enforce the Usury Law and other Consumer Protections against 1'~Oí -\v t^ U· Payday Lenders. cID notí 0cr .Jx:;t-h .g¡d¿s Of i55 UL -tv bú 7. ADMINISTRATION pna9Ult > A. Art in Public Places Art and Design Committee - Consider staff recommendation that each Commissioner select one applicant for the Art in Public Places Art and Design Committee, B. Bi-weekly Committee Reports - The Board will give updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on. ...... ...,,; CONSENT AGENDA April 10. 2001 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 27. 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Road and Bridge Ilnterlocal Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the interlo,cal agreement as drafted by the County Attorney, between the City of Port St. Lucie and St. Lucie County for the use of portions of Tract H-15 for drainage purposes for Midway Road and Glades Cut-off intersection improvements, and authorize the Chairman to sign the Interlocal Agreement. B. Road and Bridge I Equipment Request No. 01-155 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment request to purchase a used Caterpillar 950F Wheel Loader, in accordance with the St. Lucie County Purchasing Manual, from Equipment Senter, Inc. for $97,000. C. Engineering I Change Order No. 1 I Repair of Existing Control Wall at Midway Road and NSLRWCD Canal 90 - Consider staff recommendation to approve, and authorize the Chairman to sign, the change order in the amount of (-$3,000), accept the project, release retainage in the amount of $4,545 and make final payment in the amount of $5,995 to Johnson-Davis, Inc., resulting in a total contract of $46,900. @ Code Compliance I Equipment Request No. 01-246 I Budget Amendment [) . No. 01-136 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment rcd1w 9(1d' request and budget amendment to purchase a sound level meter from )D f'-\~ . Dawson Associates, Inc., in the amount of $2,760. 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Contract Amendment - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Third Amendment to the April 21, 1998 Agreement between St. Lucie County and Dawn G. Kirk, P.A., for legal representation of indigents for dependency cases, and authorize the Chairman to sign same upon obtaining all necessary signatures. B. St. Lucie County Landfill I Utility Easement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the 10' Utility Easement in favor of Florida Power and Light Company, authorize the Chairman to execute the easement and instruct staff to record the easement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. 4. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 01-028 I Hazardous Waste Disposal for Solid Waste Division - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Care Environmental, in the amount of $8,665 (total w/set up cost). ....... 'WI CONSENT AGENDA APRIL 10, 2001 PAGE TWO 4. PURCHASING (CONTINUED) B. Bid No. 01-041 / Moving Services for St. Lucie County - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the two bidders, Arnoff Moving and Hendershot Moving. Costs will be determined as needs are determined. 5. UTILITIES A. Equipment Request No. 01-245/ Budget Amendment No. 01-135 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment request and budget amendment for the purchase of a lift station pump from a sole source vendor, Flygt, in the amount of $3,275. B. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise for sealed bids for the North Hutchinson Island P.V. Martins Water, Reuse and Force Main Extension at an approximate project cost of $279,290. 6. AIRPORT A. Airfield Signage Rehabilitation Project - Consider staff recommendation to award the base construction bid and alternate bid to The Signal Group Inc., in the amount of $539,174.76 for the base bid and $110,280 for the alternate bid for a total project cost of $649,454.76. B. Taxiway A-3 Improvement Project - Consider staff recommendation to award the base construction bid to Dickerson Florida in the amount of $401,195.13. 7. COMMUNITY SERVICES Certificate of Participation for the Drug Control and System Improvement Program (Edward Byrne) Grant for 2001/02 from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign the Certificate of Participation for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement Program. 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Oleander Business Park Water Main Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve Budget Resolution No. 01-89 to appropriate and expend the funds from Fort Pierce Utilities Authority for the construction of new utilities in the Oleander Business Park in the amount of $11,888; accept the project, approve the release of retainage in the amount of $41,816.06 and approve final payment to Sheltra & Sons in the amount of $93,139.72. '- -.I CONSENT AGENDA APRIL 10, 2001 PAGE THREE 9. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Bid 01-015/ Replace Intercom System at Rock Road Jail - Consider staff recommendation to reject all bids and re-bid using alternative systems that are within the budget. ~~ cD )(1)0-1(0) ~(\o( 10. ADMINISTRATION Transfer of Funds - Consider staff recommendation to approve the transfer of $13,550 from the Maintenance Projects - Ag. Center account to the Smithsonian Building account to install light poles. Art in Public Places Art & Design Committee Appointment - Consider staff recommendation to ratify Commissioner Hutchinson's appointment of Robbin C. Lynch to the Art in Public Places Art & Design Committee. 11. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Consultant Agreement for Communications Network - Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Presidio Corporation to define the scope of work necessary for vendors to respond to the Communications RFP. ..... wi . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORlDA REGULAR MEETING Date: April 3, 2001 Tape: 1-3 , Convened: 7:00 p.m. Adjourned: 11 :00 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes, Paula A Lewis, John D. Bruhn Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attomey, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Dennis Murphy, Asst. Community Development Director, Don West, County Engineer, David Kelly, Planning Manager, Beth Ryder, Community Services Director, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-022) It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held March 2w7, 2001; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATION None 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Robert Anderson, resident, addressed the Board regarding the revision guidelines and the suggested criteria for consideration before making a decision. Attachment # 1. 4. CONSENT AGENDA (1-220) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the Consent Agenda to include item CA-l; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 26. 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Engineering/Work Authorization No. 8- The Board approved Amendment # 1 to Work Authorization No. 89 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening Inc., in the amount of $(6,020.00) and authorized execution by the Chairman of the Board. B. Engineering/Orange Avenue and NSLRCD Canal No. 57 Bridge Replacement- The Board approved Change Order No.1 reducing the contract amount by $500.00 for a final contract amount of$291,370.00. The Board also accepted the project, approved the release of retain age minus failed lab tests in the amount of $28,257.00 and approved the final payment to Johnson -Davis Inc., in the amount of$28,257.00. -1- '-' .~ C. Engineering/Florida Rock South Plant! Approval of reclamation and closure of southern half- The Board approved the reclamation and closure of the southern half (section 36). 3. COMMUNITY SERVICES Health Department/Request to Purchase- The Board approved the request of Diane Walgren, Administrator to purchase to procure the vehicles as specified and authorized the payment out of the third quarter allocation for the Health Department. 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Change in Zoning! Ocean Bay Preserve- Tbe Board approved the Proposed Application for a Change in Zoning for Ocean Bay Preserve Oœanside and authorized the Chairman to sign the application form. 5. COUNTY ATTORNEY Resolution No. 01-88- Opposing Utilization of Preservation 2000 Funds for Other State Projects. The Board approved Resolution No. 01-88. ADDITIONS CA-l- COMMUNITY SERVICES HB 1753 and SB2000- The Board approved authorizing the Chairman to send a letter to the St. Lucie County Legislative Delegation opposing the increase in county Medicaid match for hospital inpatient services. REGULAR AGENDA A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 01-012/Midway Energy Center- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution, subject to the cited conditions contained therein, granting a change in zoning from the AG 1 to the PNRD Zoning District, Preliminary PNRD approval for the Cooney- Midway Grove PNRD and partial final PNRD approval for the construction of a 150 megawatt, electric generating plant. Com. Coward disclosed those person/s he had been contacted by regarding ~s issue. Com. Barnes disclosed meeting with the petitioner, the objectors and speaking concerned citizens both in favor and opposing the project. Com. Lewis disclosed speaking with the petitioner, the objectors and many others regarding this issue. Com. Bruhn also disclosed speaking with various those within a five mile radius of the project as well as the petitioner and the objectors. Com. Hutchinson disclosed speaking with the petitioner, objectors and others. The Asst. Community Development Director reviewed the memo submitted by Mr. Jack Glatting of March 20, 2001 and provided staff response. (Attachment # 2) -2- ¥ -...; Public Comments The following residents addressed the Board in opposition to this petition. Ms. Patricia Ferrick, North Fork Homeowners Association Mr. Rodney Black, 11900 Twin Creeks Drive Ms. Arlene Goodman, White City Improvement Club and as area resident W. Burns, 4500 McCarty Road Ms. Beth McGee, 3550 So. Jenkins Road Mr. Rick Vachon, 10300 Muller Rd. Mr. Wayne Carlton, 3782 McCarty Road Ms. Janice Hopper, 1914 Esplande Chris Potteroff 85320 N. W. Slainette Mr. Tom Kindred, 1905 Wyoming Ave. Mr. Ralph Cane, 1707 Hammock Lane Ms. Ada Coats Williams, 3333 S. Indian River Drive. Mr. Harold Williams, 3333 S. Indian River Drive Mr. Buck McClellan, 10400 W. Midway Road Mr. Mark Walters, 900 Virginia Ave. Mr. Phillip Strazullo, Farm Bureau of St. Lucie County Ms. Maryann Cruise, 11995 Okeechobee Road Ms. Anna Maria Commroato, new property owner in area Mr. Billy Wilson, 5842 Clydsdale, Pony Pines Mr. James Robert DeBerry, 79 Kenwood Road Mr. Carl Warnock, Hammock Lane Those addressing the Board in favor of petition were: Mr. Victor Garrison, former Director ofFt. Pierce Utilities and now a Consultant Mr. Ed Leon Gomez, Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority Mr. David White, 11666 Lost Tree Way, Palm Beach Dr. Alvin Miller, Silver Oak Drive -3- '-" ..,J Pastor Jerome Rhyant, 911 N. 13th St.. Mr. Ed Lounds did not have a position on the issue, however, he commented on the process of the public hearing. Mr. Jeffrey Auld, Real Estate Agent, did not have a position on the issue, however, he wished to advise the Board of other possible locations which are available for the petitioner to consider. Mr. Al Molfatto, Attorney for Enron, addressed the public comments and any questions the Board had including the reasons why the McCarty and the Reynolds sites was not considered. The Asst. Community Development Director advised the Board that in their assessment of the comments made in the response memo, they believe the proposed site (the community development site) meets the county development regulations as set forth in the Land Development Code and the County's Comprehensive Plan. Generally they believe that the assumptions used in the memo are based on a proposed development plan that is not consistent with the Land Use requirements to the County's Comp Plan for the MXD area known as Midway 1-95. Com. Coward asked for our legal staff to comment on the legality of the use of the PNRD and whether he felt the proposal as submitted meets the Land Development Code requirements as it relates to the PNRD. The County Attorney stated, that what he understands is that they have modified the conditions of the PNRD, it is a 3 lot sub-division and it is a joint application and he is comfortable with the ownership issue. The issue of the PNRD more specificity has been added and the lot # 1 which is not up for final, only lots 2 and 3 or up f()T final, he felt more specificity has been added and is comfortable from a pure legal standpoint that the requirements of the PNRD have been met. The Asst. Community Development Director reviewed the conditions as stated in the resolution. He advised the Board of two added sentences to the bottom of condition 19 to read: " In the event that Midway Energy or successors assigned are determined to be in violation of the county's codes and standards regarding noise regulations, Midway Energy, it's successors and assigns shall be required to correct the cited violation within a reasonable time period as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. Failure to provide corrective actions as directed by the BCC or their authorized agent, shall result in an order to suspend plant operations until the noise violation is corrected to meet county codes". Staff recommendation is to approve Resolution No. 01-012. Com. Hutchinson asked if staff had checked and double checked the health concerns, the concerns on the aquifer etc.,. The Asst. Community Development Director advised the Board that they have checked into the emissions question independently with the USDA. They have made contact with the district to verify the completeness of the application form~ at the South Florida regarding the water use permits for Enron, however, they have not done a complete mathematical and scientific analysis of the permits because they do not have the in house resources to do so. They have reviewed and commented to the applicants on the noise issues and they have been reminded that they will comply with all applicable county codes. Com. Hutchinson requested staff comment on the news release which was presented by FPL. -4- '"" '-' The Asst. Community Development Director stated that FPL will be doing some major construction on some facilities within the state. 'They will be re-powering or construction. They are presently discussing constructing a natural gas combined cycle energy plant at the Midway Sub-Station which is located at the South West comer of the intersection ofI-95 and West Midway Road. The center appears to be particularly large for the site and will have significant addition on site which some will find objectionable on tbis property. The property is currently zoned Utilities and they bave placed a question to FPL if this \'Iill be processed under the State's Power Plant Sighting Regulations and if so, our ability to have much local in put to this is going to be severely limited. This will be a process administered by the State of Florida and not this particular Board or any other Board in the future. They want to be in operation by 2005 so they should be starting the permitting process soon. Com. Hutchinson advised the public that in speaking with an FPL representative, they were shown a picture of what the possible site would look like Le. similar to the Indiantown plant. The stacks would be as high as 250-300 feet. Com. Coward stated there is so much information wI1Ìc;, have not been received, that at this stage it is premature to think that it would look like the Indiantown plant. Com. Barnes stated I has read the news article by the LTC Ranch and listened to the allegations of their experts made. He spoke as to what he felt would be the facts after reviewing all the evidence. He felt this would not create a domino affect to the west and that this parcel is zoned AG and so are some of the parcels owned by the L TC'Ranch are also AG and that this particular parcel, the intensity is low. LTC owns property zoned where the land use is high and medium intensity for their development rights in the future. This particular plant complies with the low intensity and we are not changing the land use, we are changing the zoning. LTC Ranch own property across 1-95 and are building two of these types of power plants and this was in a letter from their attorney. He has looked at the aerial and the uses in the area, (he reviewed them) and he is convinced that this particular piece of property is compatible with the other uses in the area. He does not believe this will destroy property value in the area. He asked those opposed what particularly they did not like about the power plant it being 1500 feet off of Midway Road, barely visible from their property, and what would affec:t their property? They could not point to one thing other than it was a power plant and there will be two power plants built in a closer proximity to the housing development proposed. The housing development he reviewed was not the one approved years ago by the County Commission, and this one they have eliminated all the environmentally sensitive areas the county required to be preserved etc.,. This developer has lost all his credibility as far as he is concerned and feels this is acompetitive issue. The homeowners brought up issues that are credible, however, the project will not be utilizing as much water as previously stated. He stated he is comfortable in voting for this project. Com. Lewis stated she had a great deal of difficulty 'Nith this issue. She indicated to a resident that she needs to have a legal reason to hang her hat and deny this issue. She carmot state that it does not belong in the area because the residents do not like the way it will look. We are going to have agriculture estate living on the LTC Ranch, but will have heavy density residential. The water has been cut down by the developer, the noise of 55 decibels is just below residential night time, normal conversation is 60 decibels a.l1d a dishwasher is 50 decibels. These figures give us something to hang our hats on. She does not have a lot of tolerance for the existing electrical wires already there, the substation is there and there are quite a few other things that can go in the area which were horrifying. She is more comfortable with this power plant which is 1500 feet from the road, it will have all kinds of space behind it. She does not see the character of the area changing from what it is presently. She does not see ~llY. reaSQn with denying this petition and she sees more clear now than she dE two weeks ago and is more comfortable. She will have to approve this petition. -5- '- '-' Com. Bruhn stated he voted for the LTC Ranch because he thought this was going to remain a residential area and one of the last few n,,'~3 where ,he thought there would be any changes. With Duke and the other two plants located in an industrial ar(;h, that is fine, they will pay the price to run the wires over to the FPL plant just like Enron should, there is no reason to change the zoning, because all it will do is set precedence. When he read the land development code he did not see a reason to change the zoning based on what taxes the company will bring, only on what affect it will have on the people. This is an in~ompatible land use, and spot zoning and if he would not put it in his back yard, he is not voting to put it in theirs. Com. Coward stated, he was not going to dispute the fact that this petition meets all technical requirements. The issue in his mind is the land use compatibility, he does not believe that this Commission is limited soley to site specific technical requirements, he believes that they are also charged with looking at the broader issue of compatibility with the surrounding area. What affect it has on existing and future residents and what affect is has on their quality oflife, the property values, the public health and safety and these are all factors which can be considered and hang their legal hat on in his opinion. There are two power plants in the county and two mdre in the process. These plants were there before any building was done. He does not consider this ¡Jetition in an area that is industrial. He felt this has become a tax base issue, and the question he asks is at what expense to our community. He feels it will have a domino affect and dóes not believe it belongs in this location. The bottom line issue, whether you are for or against this plant, is LOCATION, LOCATION LOCA II ON. This is not in the appropriate location, it should be in an industrial area. It is incumbent upon them to promote good quality growth in the future and not to disinvest in those existing industrial areas and he will not be voting in favor of this issue tonight. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes to approve the petition (staff recommendation) for the reasons as stated; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn, Coward, Ayes: Barnes, Lewis, Com. Hutchinson stated the following reasons: Two of the biggest concerns she had were the aquifer and the air emission, those questions and concerns were answered. Tbe power plant downtown which has been there since she was born aJ:ld raised ~he does not know of any adverse affects of the air emissions from it. On the aquifer, and the different levels, all her concerns have been answered; and she will be voting YES. Motion to approve carried by a vote on to 2. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court .'..' -6- DRAFT NO. 1 ...... -....I REVISION GUIDELINES Suggested criteria that needs to be considered before making a decision on revisions to our Land Development Regulations, Comp Plan, Conditional Uses, Variances, Zoning Regulations and Zoning Maps. 1. At this time, is there a compelling reason to j~stify the proposed revision? 2. Is this revision going to alter the property values in the Zoning District(s) affected? Will the revision enhance or degrade? 3. Is this change being promoted because someone on staff perceives that the county could face legal challenges? If so, is the perception of a lawsuit real and imminent? 4. Is there another way this situation, dictating this revision, could be dealt with in a less impacting manner? 5. Does this proposed revision have the support of the public / taxpayers / residents of St. Lucie County? 6. Will the proposed revision improve the county's image as a desirable, quality community in which to invest? 7. Is this proposed revision possibly the "path of least resistance" in order to correct or justify a particular problem area in St. Lucie County? 8. Do you completely understand the reason for and the impact of this revision to the lives of St. Lucie county residents? If not, question the "facts" presented. 9. Would you vote in favor of the proposed change if your home, business or property were being impacted by this change? These questions are not implying that all changes are negative,. but rather to make sure that these questions and the impact of your decision are considered before you vote. attachment II 1 " '-, '......., '. ". .~, "'~. "'" >oJ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Administration , MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Ass!. Community Development Director DATE: April 3, 2001 SUBJECT: Staff Response to Jack Glatting memo of March 20, 2001, Midway Energy Center Attached is the staff response to memo submitted by Jack Glatting, of Glatting, Jackson, et ai, on March 20, 2001, regarding the Midway Energy Center. Staff would submit this to the board as our response to comments and concerns raised in this letter about the compatibility, consistency and completeness of our review of the Midway Energy Center site And the Cooney- Midway Groves PNRD development plan. If you have questions, please let me know. DJW Attachment ENRON2(a89) cc wIatt County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager attachment II 2 / / / '-' '-' MEMORANDUM DATE: March 20, 2001 TO: St. Lucie County Commissioners FROM: Jack Glatting, Principal Glatting Jackson RE: Midway Energy Center Rezoning File Number RZ-OO-018, PUD-OO-013, MJSP-OO-012 GJ Project No. 15870 As representatives of the future LTC Ranch community, we respectfully request denial of file number RZ-OO-O 18, PUD- 00-013, MJSP-00-012, application of Midway Energy Center (MEC), for rezoning of 116 acres from the AG-l (Agriculture - 1 duJacre) and AG-2. 5 (Agriculture - 2.5 duJacre) zoning districts to the Planned Nonresidential Development (pNRD) zoning district and site plan approval of the Midway Energy Center, a proposed 510 megawatt peaking electric generation facility. The proposed rezoning and Midway Energy Center site plan should be denied due to the following: It is inconsistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.. · It is not a use allowed by right within the Planned Nonresidential Development Zoning District. · It is inconsistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. It is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses. · 11 would result in adverse impacts on the natural environment. It does not provide an adequate buffer. · It is in the wrong location and does not respect the orderly and logical development pattern of the surrounding community. Each of these issues is addressed below using the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 1. WHETIlER TIlE PROPOSED REZONING IS IN. CONFLICT WITH ANY APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF TIlE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. Staff noted in their review that, 'The proposed zoning has been detennined to not be in conflict with any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code." However, staffidentified an open space issue, "Based upon the 35% open space requirement, the applicant is required to designate a minimum of 40.81 acres as open space. The proposed design of the project provides for 39.04 acres of open space during the development of Lot 2. Upon development of Lot 1 an additional 1.11 acres of land will be required to be designated as open space, in order to fulfill POINT: The site plan does not meet minimum open space requirements. . . The required 35% of open space should be provided with development of Lot 2 and it should be allocated in such a way to buffer the Midway Energy Center from approved and future adjacent mixed use communities to the south and east, St. Lucie County Response to ack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 200 11 . Cooney· Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2. 2001 Page 1 / / / '-" -' and from the adjacent rural residence to the west. The minimum open space requirement is in place to provide for "common open space, which may include parks. recreation areas. bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities, marinas. swimming beaches, common open spaci:. common landscaping or planting areas, or other areas of pubic purposes." (LDC See 7.02.03) The committed area for open space on Lot 3 of the subject property has little benefit. It does not provide recreation or any other type of public purPose, nor does it provide a buffer. The minimum open space requirements should be met and it should be reallocated to provide beneficial open space and appropriate buffers. COUNTY RESPONSE: Section 7.02.03(H) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum openspace requirements for all Planned Non-Residential Development DistrictS. The specific portions of this section that are germane to this particular application are as follows: "For development projects of ten (10) acres or more, a minimum of thirty-five (35) percent of the gross area of land to be committed to a Planned Non-Residential Development must be for use as common open space, which may include parks, recreation areas, bicycle and pedestrian paths and focilities, marinas, swimming beaches, common open space, common landscaping or planting areas, or other areas of public purpose<t other than street or road rights-of-way, utility easements, excluding exclusive stormwater treatment facilities, and parking areas. At the request of the developer, and subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners, use of recreational facilities may be offered to the general public." All areas to be dedicated for common open space shall be identified as part of the Preliminary Development Plan .for the Planned Nonresidential Development. Areas that are floodways, lakes, wetlands, and stormwater retention areas may be applied to satisfy the total common open space requirement subject to the requirement that 15% of any existing native habitat on the property must be included as part of the required 35% common open space. As part of the Final Planned Nonresidential Development submission process, the developer or petitioner for the Planned Nonresidential Development shall provide for one of the following: a. The advance dedication of all common open space to a public, or acceptable private, agency that will, upon acceptance, agree to maintain the common open space and any bui Idings, structures or improvements that have been placed on it. All such dedications or conveyances shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits, including land clearing, for any portion of the Planned Nonresidential Development: or, b. A phased conveyance af the land to be used for common open space to a public or acceptable private agency that will, upon acceptance, agree to maintain the common open space and any St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center Page 2 April 2, 2001 / .I / '-" ....,¡ buildings, structures or improvements that have been placed on it. The schedule for the. phased conveyance of any such lands to be used for common open space shall be a specific condition of approval for the Planned Nonresidential Development. The developers of this project have provided two (2) open space areas to meet the required 35% open space requirement. The first is to be located on a 39.04 acre tract north Midway Energy Center Site. The second is a 1.77 acre tract that will be located on Lot #1 of the proposed Cooney/Midway Groves - PNRD. The operative language cited in the Glattting memo asserting that this open space fails to meet the requirements of the Land Development Code reads as follows is ""common open space, which may include parks, recreation areas, bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities, marinas, swimming beaches, common open space, common landscaping or planting areas, or other areas of pubic purposes. . (LDC Sec 7.02.03)" Within this phrase is the modifier "may,", which according to the RULES OF INTERPRETATION of the Land Development Code (section 1.06.00), the term "may" is a permissive term, not a mandatory term. Noting this, the County Staff has accepted the reservation of the 39.04 acre parcel on the north end of this subdivision as meeting part of the minimum open space requirements for this development. The parcel is adjacent to the 10 Mile Creek Water Attenuation Area. The parcel in question is currently an old grove. The exotics within this area required to be removed as part of the development of the Midway Energy Site. The parcel will be supplemented with additional plantings in order to provide for a visual buffer between the Midway Energy Center and the adjoining properties. The site, if left undisturbed, can reasonably be expected to revert back into some type of native habitat the would complement the natural resources being enhanced through the 10 Mile Creek project to the north/ northwest. The Glatting assertion that this open space area does not provide public befit is not correct. While this may not be an active use area as the Glatting memo seems to infer that it should be and therefore provides no public benefit, it is the Countys opinion that it does not have to be "active" open space area since passive open space also serves a public purpose, particularly when it is located next to a regional environmental facility such as the 10 Mile Attenuation Area. In regard to the Glatting assertion that the application is not compete because it fails to identify the location of the remaining minimum open space to be located on Lot #1, Section 7.02.03(H) requires only that the open space areas be identified as part of the preliminary development plan submission. Since no final development plans for Lot #1 have been submitted, it is not necessary for there to be a specific condition of the precise location of this remaining open space. The conceptual indication that the remaining required minimum open space area will be provided as part of the Final Plan review process is consistent with action taken by the County in dealing with other planned development projects. As the final planned development applications are submitted for Lot #1, the precise location and description of all required open spaces area are to be provided. County staff does not concur the with Galtting comments that the project fails to meet the minimum open space requirements of the Planned Non-Residential Development District. St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2, 2001 Page 3 / /.) / "'" '-' POINT:The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with Land Development Code. The amendment is not consistent with the purpose of the PNRD District. "The PNRD District is intended to achieve non-residential land development of superior quality ¡hrough the encouragement offlexibility and creativity in design options that: I A. Permit creative aooroaches to the development of non-residential land reflecting changes in the technology of land development. B. Allow for the efficient use of land. which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and thereby lower development costs. C. Allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character, comoatible with surroundin2 land uses. D. Permit the enhancement Q[nei~hborhoods through the preservation of natural features, the provision ofunder~round utilities and the provision of recreation areas and open space. (We Sec 7.02.01) The proposed use of the subject property by a merchant power plant does not fulfill the intent of the PNRD.District. It does not utilize a creative approach nor does it propose a mix of uses. It does not allow for the efficient use of land. The open space provided is inadequate and non-beneficial. The design of the plant provides inadequate buffering to the east and west and will be incompatible with the proposed community to the south. Utilities will not only not be underground, but will be the sole use of the property, visible from adjacent lands. And finally, the plant will not enhance, but rather substantially damage the character of the area. COUNTY RESPONSE: County Staff does not agree with the Glatting assertion that the site plan for the Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD and the Midway energy center is not consistent with the County's Land Development Code. The Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD is a three lot mixed use non-residential development. Section 7.02.01, of the land development code reads as follows; 7.02.01 PURPOSE The Planned Non-Residential Development (PNRD) District is intended to achieve non-residential land development of superior quality through the encouragement of flexibility and creativity in design options that: . A. Permit creative approaches to the development of non-residential land reflecting changes in the technology of land development; B. Allow for the efficient use of land, which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and thereby lower development costs; C. Allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character, compatible with surrounding land uses; and D. Permit the enhancement of neighborhoods through the preservation of natural St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2, 2001 Page 4 / / / ..... - features, the pravision of underground utilities, and the provision of recreation areas and open space. A. Permit creative appraaches to the development of non-residential land reflecting èhanges in the technology of land development; The Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD has been determined to meet this purpose statement since the Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD is proposed to be developed in manner the places the highest concentration of uses in the southern portion of the development site, closet to West Midway Road, as apposed to be spread out over the property. The specific site under final PNRD review is located immediately adjacent to the Florida Power and Light Regional Power Grid lines, which for the type of use proposed to be located on this site is exactly where you want to locote. By locating here, this facility is minimizing the negative facts that additional high power overhead tension line would have on the surrounding area. B. Allow for the efficient use of land, which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and thereby lower development costs; The Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD has been determined to meet this purpose statement since the Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD is proposed to be developed in manner the places the highest concentration of uses in the southern portion of the development site, closet to West Midway Road, as opposed to be spread out over the property, By concentrating the development in one area of the site, overall development and community impact cost may be expected to be reduced. C. Allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character, compatible with surrounding land uses; and The Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD has been determined to meet this purpose statement since the Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD is proposed to be developed in manner the places the highest concentration of uses in the southern portion of the development site, closest to West Midway Road, as opposed to be spread out over the property. This concentration of uses closest to West Midway Road is wholly . compatible with the approved development intensities as reflected on Map H of the Development of Regional Impact known as LTC Ranch. Referencing the land use intensity maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan for this area, the intensity classification of the Cooney-Midway Groves PNRDsite is for Low Use activities. The intensity classification of the properties directly to the south (the LTC Ranch site) and directly to the east (the Hall property) are Medium and High Intensity Uses. Policy 1.1.7.5 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, addresses in further detail the specific intensities allowed/required in these areas. As can be seen from these . St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20. 20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2. 2001 Page 5 / r .' ./ '-' ...., Public Service/Utility .25 FAR The subject property is within the Midway/Glades Mixed Use Activity Area. The Midway/Glades Mixed Use Activity Area is defined with high, medium, and low intensity areas radiating oyt in intensity from the intersection,of 1-95 and Midway Road. Low intensity uses define the outer edge of the Mixed Use Activity Area. The subject property is located within a Low Intensity development area. Policy 1.1.7.3 mandates that a formal mixed use zoning designation be incorporated into the Land Development Code that further defines the perfonnance standards governing the mix and intensity of the land uses within it. The policy is stated as follows: Policy 1.1. 7.3 St. Lucie County shall by August 1990, incorporate into its Land Development Regulations a formal Mixed use (MXD) zoning designation permitting both residential and non-residential development within a single planned development. These district regula/ions shall contain specific performance standards governing the mix and intensity of the land uses' within it. The Planned Mixed Use Development zoning designation was established to further define the mix and intensities of the Mixed Use Activity Area. The Low Intensity regulations are of particular relevance because the subject property is located in aLow Intensity development area. Section 7.03.02defines the permitted uses for low intensity development areas as follows: AJ1y permitted use as identified in the Residential, Estate-I (RE-I), Residential, Estate-2 (RE-2); Residential, Single-Family-2 (RS-2); Residential, Single-Family-3 (RS-3); Residential, Single-Family-4 (RS-4); Residential, Multiple Family-5 (RM-5); Residential, Mobile Home-S (RMH-5); Commercial, Neighborhood (CN); Commercial Office (CO): Commercial General (CG); Industrial, Light; or HIRD zoning districts oftrus Code, any accessory use specified in the final PMUD, and any conditional use specified in the final PMUD, subject to the requirements of Section 11.0 7.00 and any other special requirement as set forth in this Code may be permitted in any area designated Low Intensity Mixed Use Developmentto the extent consistent with the future The low intensity development area does not allow utility uses. A comprehensive plan amendment to amend the land use to medium or high intensity is necessary to allow the utility use. COUNTY RESPONSE: If the petitioned property was to be developed under the Countýs PMUD zoning district, the above polices would appear to be correctly cited. However, the petitioned property is not being developed under the PMUD designation, but rather the PNRD development standards, which the County through prior application to other MXD areas of the County has determined to be a compatible zoning designation within the MXD Land Use. It is the position of the County that the Public Service/Utility Land Uses allowed in the Low Intensity Land Use areas could allow utility operations, subject to meeting the standards of Policy 1.1.7.5 of The Countys Comprehensive Plan. A Plan amendment is not required so long as the intensity requirements of this Policy are not violated. POINT,The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the 51. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Às stated in the Future Land Use Element, "Integral to the success of the Comprehensive Plan are the Goals, Objective, and Policies which will be used to direct the location and intensity of developmentfor the variety of uses necessary for a healthy and diversified community. " St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2, 2001 Page to / / ,/ "'" ¡ "-" Goal].] Ensure a high quality living environment through a mixture of land uses that will enhance St. Lucie Countys natural and manmmle resources while minimizing any threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the County's citizens throu&h incomuatible land uses and environmental degradation. - POINT: Residential and utility uses are allowed in the same land use category, Mixed Use, but that does not mean that the uses should be allowed to locate next to each other. The uses are not compatible. The Future Land Use Element addresses this compatibility issue in several policies. COUNTY RESPONSE: See above comments for response. The Glatting memo presupposes that the development on the property to the east and south, presumedly that which is directly adjacent to the Cooney-Midway Grove Property would be developed solely in a residential nature. This assumption is not consistent with the approved Map H of the LTC Ranch Development of Regional Impact. There are no' other development plans submitted to the County for preliminary or final review for this property. The reference to adjacent development plans for the parcel to the east are for plans have only been presented as a conceptual layout of what might be located on the property. These plans have not been reviewed for compliance with minimum county codes and standards. "Uses within the areas classified as Mixed Use should be segregated as to intensity and indicated in thefonn ofa concept master plan. " POINT:NOlmally, an applicant for a very high intensity land use is expected to accommodate a transition of intensity on the applicant's site. The very small area of the plant (28 acres), and the remoteness of the open space does not allow this to be achieved. .. COUNTY RESPONSE: See above comments for response. Criteria to be used in the development of Mixed Use areas includes the foIlowing: "All uses shall be compatible with internal and external adjacent land uses. " . Objective 1.].2 Provide in the land development regulations provisions for a compatible and coordinated land uses pattern which establishes agri culture as the primary use outside of the urban service boundary and promote retention of agri cultural activities, preserve natural resources and maintain native vegetative habitats. POINT: The approval of the power plant will disrupt the compatible and coordinated land use pattern in the area. (See land use pattern argument below) COUNTY RESPONSE: See above and below comments for response. St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 . Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2, 2001 Page 11 / ../ V' , ....,¡ Objective 1.1.4 Require through the County's Land Development Regulations, specific peiformance criteria lie. Landscaping and use separation standards, TDR 's), that all new development be compatible with surrounding land uses, both existing andfuture as represented in this Element. POINT: All new development must be compatible with surrounding land uses. Perfotmance criteria are not used. The uses are not separated. Buffers are inadequate. . COUNTY RESPONSE: See above and below comments for response. Objective 1.1. 7 Future development and redevelopmenj activities shall be directed to those areas depicted with urban land use designations on the FutureLand Use Map and are to be consistent with sound planning principles contained in the goals, objectives, and policies of this plan. POINT:This development is not consistent with the sound planning principles contained in the goals, objectives. and policies of this plan. COUNTY RESPONSE: See above and below comments for response. The proposed development site is located in the designated urban service area of the county. The proposed development site has an urban land use designation of Mixed Use. The development sitel site plan has been determined through County reviews to meet the minimum criteria of both the Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. The Glatting memo fails to explain how, or why they feel that this site is not within the urban service area of the County; that the site is not in an urban land use area and how the site is not consistent with the Goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The commentary in this 'point" appears to be generic response to support their contention. _. St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 Cooney-Midway Grovcs PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2, 200 1 Page 12 / ,/ " '-' , ""'" Objective 1.1.8. The protection of the singlefamily neighborhood as a defined residential areaform the encroachment of commercial and/or other inappropriate land uses will be providedfor through the Land Developmen! Regulations. POINT: The approval of this rezoning allows an inappropriate land use to encroach upon tlie approved residential neighborhood. COUN1Y RESPONSE: The commentary in the Glatting memo is wrong, and appears to based on certain assumptions that are without foundation. Aside from the approved Development of Regional Impact known as LTC Ranch, there are no other "approved" residential neighborhoods in the immediate of this development site. There are scattered residential uses that have been developed on large to moderate sized parcels ' along West Midway Road. Referencing the land use intensity maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan for this area, the intensity classification of the Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD site is for Low Use activities. The intensity classification of the properties directly to the south (the LTC Ranch site) and directly to the east (the Hall property) are Medium and High Intensity Uses. Policy 1.1.7.5 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, address in further detail the specific intensities allowed/required in these areas. As can be seen from these Tables, the High and Medium use areas allow for development intensities greater than the Low area. These use intensities are reflected on the approved LTC Ranch Master Plan, Map H. There is no submitted or approved master plan, other than that which is shown as part of Policy 1.1.7.5 of the Countys Comprehensive Plan for the Hall property. The master plan that appears to be referenced in the Glatting memo has never been reviewed by the County or determined by the County to be consistent with applicable codes and standards. Policy 1.1.8.5 Require effective visual and light difusion barriers between residential and nonresidential uses. POINT:The buffers are inadequate. COUN1Y RESPONSE: This objection appears to be based on conjecture and not a review of the submitted development plans for either the Cooney-Midway Groves PNRO or the Midway Energy Center. While the general PNRD plans for the Cooney-Groves property do not include visual buffer details, other than the general identification òf Open Space, they don't have to. As the individual lots within the development are processed for Final PNRD reviews, the final development plans that are part of those submissions are required to include landscape plans signed by registered Florida Landscape Architect. The Midway Energy Site Plan submissions include these site plans. . The Midway Energy Site Plans drawings iRdicate a perimeter buffer in excess of minimum County Codes and standards. The average height of the trees at time of planting will be n the 12-18 foot range. This is two to eight feet higher than minimum codes. In addition a perimeter berm is also St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glátting Memo Date March 20,20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2. 200 1 Page 13 ./ ./ / '""'" ...J shown on the project site plans. Additional landscape details are shown on the submitted conceptual lands~ape plans. Policy 1.1.8.10 Encourage the use of existing commercial and indus/rial designated lands within the urban service are, through requiring astrict demonstration of service availability, before authorizing Land Use and Zoning amendments in areas not presently indicated as having such a designation. POINT: There are available lands within areas that do not need land use or zoning amendments. This is demonstrated through the fact that Enron' s competitors all are looking at sites that are located in areas that are appropriate. It is also demonstrated by the following statement made in the Comprehensive Plan: "The Future Land Use Map designates more land use acreage than is projected to be required to accommodate the minimum year 201 S population needs. Additional urban land uses have been Included: 1. To provide choice oflocatlon; 2. To be able to take Into account environmental constraints; and 3. To recognize site specific limitations." Policy 1.1.9.11 Require, through the County s land development regulations new urban type developments near agricultural areas to avoid adverse Impacts on the natural resources essential to production of crops and citrus. POINT:The approved LTC Planned Development is appropriate in the Mixed Use district bordering the agricultural area, but the utility use is not. It will have adverse impacts on the agricultural areas. COUNTY RESPONSE: This objection appears to be based on conjecture and assumption on the part of the Glatting reviewers. There are vacant industrial lands within the Midway Road/ I-95 area. However the County does not require that just because there may be alternate sites available for a particular type of development that the site the applicant has proceeded with is to be summarily rejected because of the potential availability of alternate sites. In the case of the Midway Energy Site, the developers of the site have indicated that they did conduct a property search for a suitable site approximately 12 months ago. As represented to the County, the general criteria for their search was adequate sized 40- 60 acres; proximity to fuel supplies, Florida Gas Transmission line or the proposed Duke/Williams (Gulfstream) pipeline; and accessability to the FPL power grid. - The quoted statement from the Future Land Use Element is correct. There are a number of industrial acres in other parts of the County that could be used for industrial or utility type purposes. However, as noted above, what has been represented to the County is that unless the other industrial properties met the search criteria of the Midway Energy Center, they could not be seriously considered. Within the immediate area of the Midway Energy Property, the largest area of undeveloped industrial property is the property owned by the primary Glatting client, LTC ranch. It has not been the Countys position to force a land sales or development activity that otherwise meets all requirements St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Eoergy Center April 2, 2001 Page 14 / / / '- ,..,¡ from one property to another property, just because the objedors are desirous of having it located on th~ir holdings instead of the selected location. The assertion that the LTC Ranch Development site is compatible with low density agricultural uses to the west of the urban service area and the proposed Cooney-Midway Groves is wrong. As previously noted, the approved development for the LTC Ranch DRI site is the attached Map H. Referencing the areas immediately south of the Cooney-Midway Groves property, parcels 3a, 3b and 3c of the LTC Ranch site have a development potential approximately double that of the Cooney-Midway Groves property. If the proposed Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD site is not consistent with the adjacent agricultural uses in the area, then logic would indicate that the approved LTC Ranch is also inconsistent and should probably not have been approved in the first place: Nothing in the Glatting memo supports the assertion that the development of the Cooney-Groves site will have an adverse effect on the surrounding agricultural environment. As noted in the support materials accompanying the application for the Midway Energy Center. Ground water impacts are from the Floridian aquifer, not the surficial. Air emissions are within allowable state and federal limits and based upon the information that County staff has been able to determine through discussions with local USDA researchers at the Citrus Research Station in Ft. Pierce, the emissions from this facility are not expected to have any negative effect on the local citrus or ornamental crops. 3. WHETHER AND TIlE EXTENT TO WHICH TIlE PROPOSED CHANGE IN ZONING IS INCONSISTENT wmr THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES. Staff notes, 'This proposed change in zoning and the accompanying Preliminary Planned Nonresidential Development site plan modifies the existing development pattern in this area of the County." Again, however, no anaiysis is given as to the consistency with existing and proposed land uses. It only notes that the parcel is appropriate for a Mixed Use development as determined by the Future POINT:The proposed Midway Energy Center is inconsistent with existing development. The Comprehensive Plan shows that a transition of land uses from high to low intensity is the intended development pattern. This proposed use will reverse the land use pattern, placing a high intensity use on the outer edge of the urban service boundary where low intensity uses are intended. The staff even states that the zoning change will modify the existing development pattern from agricultural to industrial. West of 1-95 is very rural, with scattered residents, orange groves, pasture land, and some truck traffic. It has a lazy, peaceful feel. There are no industrial uses on the north side of Midway Road west of 1-95. The only industrial use visible in the area is the FP&L Substation adjacent to 1-95. The power plant would be better located east of 1-95 in the Glades Cut-off area. East of 1-95 is very industrial, with lots of vacant land suitable for additional industrial uses, and heavy truck traffic. No land use or zoning changes would be necessary in this area. St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20,20011 Cooney.Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2. 2001 Page 15 // " - "----_...c______..__ '-' ....I there are no other "approved" residential neighborhoods in the immediate of this development site. There ore scattered residential uses that have been developed on large to moderate sized parcels along West Midway Road. Referencing the lond use intensity maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan for this area, the intensity classification of the Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD site is for Low Use activities. The intensity classification of the properties directly to the south (the LTC Ranch site) and directly to the eost (the Hall property) are Medium and High Intensity Uses. Policy 1.1.7.5 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, address in further detaii the specific intensities allowed/required in these areas. As can be seen from these Tables, the High and Medium use areas allow for development intensities greater than the Low area. These use intensities are reflected on the approved LTC Ranch Master Plan, Map H. There is no submitted or approved master' plan, other than that which is shown as part of Policy 1.1.7.5 of the Countys Comprehensive Plan for the Hall property. The master plan that appears to be referenced in the Glatting memo has never been reviewed by the County or determined by the County to be consistent with applicable codes and standards. The commentary in this part appears to pass over the fact that the property to the east of the Cooney-Midway Groves site is bisected by two main power line corridors that will have an effect on the development options taking place there. 4. NA COUNTY RESPONSE: None. 5. NA COUNTY RESPONSE: . None. 6. WHETHER AND THE EXTENT TO WIllCR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT. Staff recognizes that "The proposed amendment will create a certain amount of adverse impacts on the natural environment." Noise and emission issues are addressed. Staff concludes however, that "project emissions are all less than allowed within EPA regulations... the proposed plant is expected to have an insignificant impact on air quality." And "There will be no significant impact on the surrounding properties by the noise emissions from the electric generation plant." St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2. 2001 Page 17 / / / '- ...J POINT: An inadequate buffer is provided. Noise at the property is at the County maximum The open space buffer proposed in the site plan is located north of the proposed electric generation plant. This open space has little benefit. The primary use to the north is an attenuation facility. An alternative would be to exchange the power plant land uses proposed on lot 2 with the open space land uses on lot 3. COUN1Y RESPONSE: See above comments. 7. WHETHER AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD RESULT IN AN ORDERLY AND LOGICAL DEVELOPMENT PATIERN SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFYING ANY NEGATIVE AFFECTS OF SUCH PATIERNS. The staff notes that the "subject site is designated with a MXD Midway Road Future Land Use Map designation which permits the increase in development intensity through a variety of uses. The proposed preliminary PNRD [with a large single use electric generation plant] will provide for a change in the overall development pattern in the surrounding area." "The general character of the surrounding properties will change from agricultural to a more industrial character." No statements or analyses are made as to whether this pattern change is appropriate or not. This is a very important land use policy that should be carefully considered. POINT: Wrong Location. The proposed amendment will result in an illogical development pattern with negative effects on the area. The pattern of development from east to west is as follows: There is a highly concentrated industrial section from Glades Cut-off to the Turnpike. West of the Turnpike is a Mixed Use Activity Area, which fonas the urban service boundary. Beyond this urban boundary is all ruraIlagricultura1lands consisting of orange groves, pasture lands and scattered residences. It has a lazy, peaceful feel with some truck traffic. The only industrial use visible in the area is the FPL Substation adjacent to 1-95. The power plant is proposed in the Mixed Use Activity Area, which has approvals for a new predominantly residential community. The residential community and this proposed industrial use are not compatible. Industrial uses such as a power plant are obviously most appropriate in the Industrial and Utility land use categories. The industrial area east of . 1-95 has ample available vacant land suitable for industrial uses and heavy truck traffic. COUN1Y RESPONSE: Midway Road, west of I-95 is one of the most heavily traveled east/west truck routes in the County. It is one of only two routes that provide access to the central part of the State of Florida. It is the only route that provides access to the SR 70 corridor from the City of Port St. Lucie. Recently, the St. Lucie MPO reaffirmed this role for this roadway by eliminating from future considerations the possibility of a third east/west route from southern Port St. Lucie to the SR 70 corridor. West St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2. 2001 Page 18 // / / '-' J Midway Road may appear to be a small rural roadway, but is function classified as a rural arterial roadway. The area of the proposed Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD is both boarded, and bisected, by prirl1ary FPL transmission lines, of 500kv (one set) and 230 kV (2 sets of lines). These lines are visible from throughout the area. The project files contain additional detailed information on the condition of the surrounding lands to the Cooney-Midway Groves site. The proposed Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD lies within the urban service. The assertion in the Glatting memo that the urban service area lies east of 1-95 is not correct. The assertion that the more appropriate location for this facility would be east of 1-95 fails to indicate any supporting evidence for this other than assumption of use. Unless the selected location was already zoned Utility or had another acceptable zoning designation in place, which would not include Heavy Industrial, a change in zoning would be required. The proposed development site is located in the designated urban service area of the county. The proposed development site has an urban land use designation of Mixed Use. The development sitel site plan has been determined through County reviews to meet the minimum criteria of both the Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. The Glatting memo fails to explain how, or why they feel that this site is not within the urban service area of the County: that the site is not in an urban land use area and how the site is not consistent with the Goals of the Comprehensive Plan. , 8. WHETHER THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD BE IN CONFLICT WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND IS IN HARMONY WITH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THIS CODE. Staff states, "The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. ThePNRD Zoning District provides opportunities that allow for the development of more intense uses. POINT: There is a direct conflict with public interest. We disagree. The approved residential community and this proposed industrial use are not compatible. POINT: Several other proposed merchant power plants are planned in the area. St. Lucie County is currently served by a nuclear power plant located on Hutchinson Island, and a power plant located in downtown Ft. Pierce. The downtown PI. Pierce power plant was recently bought by Duke. Duke is working to rebuild the plant and to integrate the plant into the community better. False facades around the plant will most likely be built. Sites for future or rumored power plants are listed below: C9· Location Zoning Land Use Enron Duke Midway Rd Midway Industrial Park AG-I & AG-2 U(Utility) Mixed Use Industrial St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2. 2001 Page 19 / ~,/ '-' J Panda CTV Decker FPL Substation LTC Ranch in PI. St. Lucie LTC Ranch in PI. St. Lucie rn PI. St. Lucie PI. St. Lucie Mixed Use PI. St. Lucie PI. St. Lucie The Duke plant has a conditional use permit and is located in an appropriately Zoned area. The Panda plant has a heavy industrial land use and is located adjacent to the FPL Substation. The crv & Decker plants are located in PI. St. Lucie in appropriate areas east of 1-95. COUNTY RESPONSE: The commentary in th':. Glatting memo is wrong, and appears to based on certain assumptions that are without foundation. Aside from the approved Development of Regional Impact known as LTC Ranch, there are no other 'approved' residential neighborhoods in the immediate of this development site. There are scattered residential uses that have been developed on large to moderate sized parcels along West Midway Road. Referencing the land use intensity maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan for this area, the intensity classification of the Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD site is for Low Use activities. The intensity classification of the properties directly to the south (the LTC Ranch site) and 'directly to the east (the Hall property) are Medium and High Intensity Uses. Policy 1.1.7.5 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, address in further detail the specific intensities allowed/required in these areas. As can be seen from these Tables, the High and Medium use areas allow for development intensities greater than the Low area. These use intensities are reflected on the approved LTC Ranch Master Plan, Map H. There is no submitted or approved master plan, other than that which is shown as part of Policy 1.1.7.5 of the Countys Comprehensive Plan for the Hall property. The master plan that appears to be referenced in the Glatting memo has never been reviewed by the County or determined by the County to be consistent with applicable codes and standards. The commentary in this part appears to pass over the fact that the property to the east of the Cooney-Midway Groves site is bisected by two main power line corridors that will have an effect on the development options toking place there. The commentary that 'St. Lucie County is currently served by a nuclear power plant..... appears to fail to grasp that these power facilities are not local facilities. These are regional facilities. The reference to the Ft. Pierce power facility being acquired by 'Duke Energy" are also wrong. The Ft. Pierce Utility Authority has entered into a partnership arrangement with the ENRON to improve the downtown power generation facility. The questions to be asked from technical point of view, as it applies to the standard of review in this Land Development Code, is what difference does the number of facilities in the community, as a whole, make when reviewing the specific petition of the Midway Energy site?? St. Lucie County Response to Jack GIatting Memo Date March 20, 200t! . Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2. 200t Page 20 r -' i .' ./ ........, ..../ CONCLUSION We believe the County should deny this application based upon the above statements and adhere to the Comprehensive Plan and desired development patterns planned for this area. If this application is approved, it would be arbitrarily reshaping the character of this area. COUNTY RESPONSE: Okay?? The conclusion is noted and disagreed with based upon the above comments. St. Lucie County Response to Jack Glatting Memo Date March 20, 20011 Cooney-Midway Groves PNRD & Midway Energy Center April 2, 2001 / / / - ---.. ......-,-..-.., . . Page 21 ......... ...,; - z+ 8 co ~ '^ ( ) . 0 -:r II (\j . g. - '. c: ~ ~ & ( ) 11 g. r'! ~ c: a .0 ~ -Ë' .i::¡ ï .s a.. -= (\j ( ) CIJ J c: §- .Q I .. (\j ::=: ò5 'VI. o .¡:: >.;;, () '- "0 a.. a.. c: :::::: -J e (\j ~ a: ¡"::-J I I I I C't) """ lC) co ,... .,.. .,.. ,... ~ ....: ~ ~ ¡¡} ü .9 a ci': CIJ - .q :S .... ( ) ï::: ~ ....... - ü CIJ q '- c::: .g ~ a: .CD - .s; c::: ~ c::: I .~ ~ 2 ~ 1) .c:: c:: .s; ä: 8 -J I I I I 0) a ,... C\J ,... ,... ,... CIJ Cù -- aQ) :s .~ -e CIJ """ CD -ð~§- .~ .s; .s; Q: ~ :::"':::..,:::'" ~ ~ ro'~ a...~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I I I I lC) co 1'0... co ( ) ü c:: ( ) ~ C/) ~ -è S: ~ a I .,.. C\J e 0) .S .8 c:: C/) f ~ ( ) - .S! 0 a.. ~ c:: e C/) .g .92 c:: a.. § - ~ .S! .!S! .S ..... ç;: c: >.;;, r" . ........ J Comments from Callers Responding to the Newspaper Ad 1) 2) I support the project. I live in N. Ft. Pierce. (Male) This is a resident of St. Lucie County. I live near Midway Rd. I really approve of your plant. I'm glad you're going to build it. And my phone number is 464-7382. I have no problems with it and good luck. Hope everything works out for you. (Female) I live in Port St. Lucie and I'm in favor of the plant. (Male) This is June Cummings. I support the new power plant. I welcome it. I think the environmental wackos have done too much. Thank you. (Female) My name is Dick Spalding. I'mjust a citizen of St. Lucie County and I am· certainly 100 percent for having the power plant there. We need power. I know it's clean. And I know its ridiculous to stop it on the grounds that people are attempting to do so. Thank you. (Male) I was answering to the telephone ad in the paper. Yeah, I'm in favor of putting the power plant out there. Those damn people have been holding back Port Pierce for centuries. Bye. (Male) This is Charles Dykes. I'm calling in reference to the rezoning for the electrical plant and I've got no problems with the plant. We probably could use it. This 150 to 200 construction jobs...I' d like to see that go to local people, not companies owned by our County Commissioners' families or anything like that. Thank you. (Male) . I'm just calling to give my support to Enron. Thank you. (Female) Yes, I was just calling to voice our support for the Enron North America electric power plant in Port Pierce, Florida. Thank you. (Female) This is Susan Dale in Port St. Lucie. I wanted to lend my voice of support for your power plant. And I hope all works out well and you can keep on going. Thanks for doing a good thing. Bye-bye. (Female) My name is Prank Gaylord and I'mjust calling in support of the plant. Thank you. (Male) Well, I had expected a computerized voice saying we'll tabulate your support. I am from St. Lucie County. I'm calling about the ad in the paper. I am . supporting the building of the natural gas fired peaking power plant here in St. . Lucie County off Midway Rd. I do agree with all of the information that's here and have been keeping up with the information...pro and con. My last name is Baylo. ..335-3268. And it's really not necessary to call me back I have no questions. (Female) This is Ken Olin. I am in support of the new plant and have written a letter to the editor. (Male) This is Herb Oscar Anderson.. .5359 North AlA.. .466-3460. Build the damn plant. Get it going. Past. The sooner, the better. Thank you. (Male) I'mjust calling in reference to the ad. I live in St. Lucie County...zip code 34982. I'm in favor of the plant.. The last thing we need is more urban sprawl. This is a great project for our county. (Male) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) attachment II 3 '- J 16) I'mjust calling to add my support to the project. You don't have to call me back. Bye. (Male) 17) Hello. This is Mr. Catchorolles (sp?) down ,in Port St. Lucie. I'm all in (avor of the plant to be on Midway Rd. I see nothing wrong with it. So I think we should have it there. Thank you very much. (Male) 18) I'm in support of it. (Male) 19) I'm calling in response to the ad in the Tribune. I'm calling on behalf of our household and there are 3 people in our house. We are all in favor of the plant. We live between Fort Pierce and Stuart. Good luck and we hope you get to build it. (Female) 20) I am in favor of the plant. It sounds like a good thing and we certainly do not want to be caught short of power in the future. My husband was in construction of power plants in New Jersey, so I know there is no risk associated with them. Thank you. (Female) 21) I am calling about the ad. My name is Mrs. Thomas and my telephone number is 561-489-3793. Thank you. (Enron returned her call and her comments follow) I'm all for it. And so is my husband and two daughters. Build that sucker. (Female) 22) I read your ad and am supporting the new plant. (Female) 23) I'm calling in regards to the full-page ad in the St. Lucie Tribune. I don't have any questions and I don't see any problems with the location. For the life of me, I drive down that road all of the time and can't see anyone out there. I can't imagine who would oppose this project. I hope the Commissioner's Court votes in your favor. (Male) 24) Sam Paglione of St. Lucie West (561-343-0093) - I'm in favor of the plant. (Male) 25) Bert Anderson of Fort Pierce (561461-6960) - I'm in favor of the plant. (Male) 26) I'm in favor. I wish there had been a map in the ad to show us exactly where the facility would be located. There are a number of plants and commercial activities in the area, so there will be little impact on citizens Florida is on the verge of becoming Califomia. We need power and the Utility Commission should be requiring better reserves from the utilities. Thanks for coming to our area. (Male) 27) . I was calling about the power plant in St. Lucie County. How big is the power plant going to be? (Enron answered "510 megawatts") That's a nice size. I'm with the plumbers union and we are encouraging our members in the area to go to the Commission meeting tomorrow to support the facility. Thank you. (Male) 28) I got the number from the ad. I'm in favor of the plant. (Male) 29) I live in St. Lucie Coiinty and I support you building the plant. (Male) 30) This is Diane Merritt in Fort Pierce, actually White City. I was just calling to give my support. We are fully backing up Enron, hoping they get their approvai at the County Commission meeting this evening. (F!:male) 31) My name is Glim Moberly. And Isupport the Enron unit. We don't need another situation like we have in California. Thank you. Bye bye. (Male) . "- ...,/ 32) This is Bob Padalford, a resident of St. Lucie County. I am responding to your ad and other ads in regards to the power plant and to let you know that I'm in favor of it. I feel that the complaints that are brought against it are . mostly self-serving and not in the best interest of St. Luce County. My ph'one number is 561-878-0711. Thank you. 33) This is Susan McAdoo, a resident of St. Lucie. I'm in favor of it. I feel like this will benefit the county and will add good jobs. ..good paying jobs. It is in a good location. We need power. Thank you. -. Ipr-O,-¡OO~ IO:,U,m 'rom-,k~~N~~k, IkIUkl" '.1. I,m"sm ]-(,O P.OOlI005 f-551 - e4/e2/2BBl 1~:45 5&1832462","-, ......, ;..,......1- ..../ PAGE . AnnoS.Cati:rell&.< A~~ociai:ec;. Inc. T~ c:o..-.SuikJi"9' ~IQ Üemat'S Street:. SUM 600 Po. Bo. 'Ç058. Wert Palm B-J,. ¡:1or;J, ~r6 (:s6r) Õ31·4ÓOQ f.., (561) 8Yl·4¢(O . Apri12. 2001 Alfi'cd 1. MIIlefauo, Esq. Cìt'ccnbc:rg Tnurig 777 No11h Pla¡¡!er Drive Suire 3aOE Wl:St Palm Beach, FL 33401 RE: MIDWAY ENERGY CENTER Dear Mr. MAlefano: We are in ~ceípt oía copy oCthe'Mareh 20¡ 2001 OIemorandlll111i;oød~ Gllltting to St. Lucie County Commissionm .regMding the Midway Energy Center Remning. índ offer !he following: Mr. Glatting 8IISerts that the applicalioll is ÍII cotlfliCt with ccnaill æpe~ of ùw Land J)evelopmentCode; sí= irfaitH!) mee'Uhnequiretl35%opeo space Infnimum. We note that !he minimum open S )sœ rcqUÍlelllCo1t is qUire easily accoltltllOdafCd on the oveta!1116 ac~s . submftted'forÙlCPNRD' zonj¡¡g; andlhe condition IISsociatcd with the tQPning wilJ ensure that the balance of the open space noqušremenl will be me! on Lot 1 of the development, which is reserved for future mixcd II.5cfmdils1rial development. It iscertain.lyobvious thatt!le proYidcd'openspace is not usefWfur me ''te¡:RalioD'' to which Mr. GlättÏDg refers, lIor for the "bicycle l1li4 pcdes1rian patha índ facilities, tTIMinas, swiauoiDg beacb.es¡or·common-lend5captng Or plllntin¡ areas" Üiê Land' Dêvelopm~n¡ Code suggests m!IX be provided in a PNR.D, but we disagree with the aslcttion lhat the open space "has little benefit". Theopcn·space·providea·lIpptOpliate apalWScparatiön of-the: faeUity Ú'Om other properties, particularly east and west, and ll'anSilional m.... for propèny north, as weU as allows for the-it=tpOmion-ofsubStall1iIl! and effecti~ bùffCis alöng the ME'Clàci1ity propony. Mr; OUutlng alSCt States·thatthtrczcDingis not collSÍSlent with tho I;at d Deve:lopment Code because II does nOl fulfill the iment orme PNRD district. We disagreè with this assenion, IIIId maintairl'1hcr proposed MEC is approprluc at this location precisely bocaJ1ae It promotes a efficient u5e of 11tIUI, laking Advllnlagc of a1rea<Iy cstablishec11ancl uses. It is bard to overstate !he land'uscsigJlifi= oflhl' coim:ideJiee oftbo eXÍSlÍDg FLTiimsrnissioD lipcs and the gas tr""'~;"ion lines. While tbe:ie existing facilitic:s may be II detriment to the 10ClUion of other IlIDcI =S, panìculärly residetitiof; it is clearly Iiïê most powc:rfu.1 anraction for the siting of me MEC facility. t.: ':¡ '~' . ~'"I-~'", , · ApI-O)-ZOOI' In"O,m ß4/ß2/2ß81 18:~5 From-GREENBERG TRAU"G. P A. 561832462~ ''-of ]5616555111 T-/SO P 003/005 ,-," '-' ...." PAGE. U~ Ó:Jllt<8..I.. Alfred Malefano 'April 2, 200) Page Two/MEC The Cilablishmcpt· of !he MEC at !lie proposoàlocarjop lICUIaIIy elimjnates me Qeed for !lie OOIIS!t'IIClÍon of additional overhead 1nUI&mission lÎIII:s aDd gas ItBlm!lissiop facilities which woulcl-1x:1IDeded to serw liltemaliVelOCAliOllS.lIiërcby roducin¡ fu!U 'e pou:¡¡tiallIIId use confJicts. Mr. Glaniu¡ also cOlllalds!lle proposed Iczolling is no! COnaiB\CI11 with alLoflhc CIDmCIIIS oflhc St. Lucio CountyComprdu:miv¡: Plan, as ¡¡"docs IIOt meeuhe. inœntof.t.b.c Mixed Use Land Use . designalioll", it is ioconsislDI1t with the Futuro Land Use Map,WId inconsistent wilh the Low intensitY. Mixed Use Dove!opøu=nt ^"" LandU&o<:aIe¡OlY. We.o~ CODCllØCnœ wi!ll the County statfin their fIndins that the I'C2ODing Is COl13istcnt wilh all relevant elemCIIII of the Comprehensive Plan. 8ased 011 OUfrevi,,",wc ha\'Cconclude<ilhat Ihc use iil pmJIined wilhilJ the lIS3igocd land use dcsig!lalioll3, i.e. Mixed Use: LaIId Use, which allows indusltiallUld utility uses wilh a lilnit on inrcnsity, and AG- 2.5; Mr. Glanin&_"ns that, WÏthA mllXÏlIRInI.25t1oor aIel!. mia, the clèaI\ io= of me intensity limitations for public aCIVicelUtiJity uses is to pcmUt .ucl1 USe. only CO "suppon other communi\)' oricnTÞC! uses". We ~lievcÙlllt Mr: 'Glattína ai ¡IÙfiëlUltly '\ßdema~ the relative . intell3ity of this 1100r anoa mlo, aød haa colISCqUCJUly cued in hi. eom:lusioQ. We offer the following =ple:·a devclopmcnt)'iehtof'.25 ttOor area ratiö is cODSÍSlqnt wilh that genetally achieved i4 conventiOlllll suburblm Slylc conuucn::ial shoppin¡: œu!I:T, clevcloped withlllÌniItlum setbacb,-periâng' III2ItllUldscapiu¡¡. A 1)'plëal'êeatcr IIIICholed by a grocc:tj 'fOre would be about 125,000 square t'c~. COII~t this with the maximum intensity permitted by the Comprehensive P!m fortbe subject siTe: AI .25 maximum floor area ratio, the 35.97 acres MEC parcel would yield s.clevelopment 0[391,713 square feet, bardly a "supponing use". U1Iing Mr. Glattina's argumem;l!IctI theMEC's proposed' 132,550 square feel, ar .08 tJOOI' area ratio, is ""llIalIy more slIgges1Í\"C ofa "supporting use" than the majodalld..U$!: iIúlllCl1Ce he suncal¡¡. Mr. Olauing UOIe' in his memorandum that the proposed facility is inconsistent with the Comprehen&ivc'PlarI's' inu:ncIWtrallSitioual'develôpzn....t pIIttC1'1I, ~."., higher density ancl intensity develop"",,",t JDCfUCd closest fO the I-95iMidway Røad ~cbanSO, with a loWlOrin¡ of clcnaityandintonsityfanherawayfrOtlJ'lMintm:IianSC. Rtf a.lso sugges'IJI that the proposed facility is inconsimnt with the Comp~lve PIIIII beca\I$C it wiU clis¡upt the "compatible and coordillaœd'þ nd' ~p¡ment in tbearca"; TlIis Is the illSlle with which we have the most serious disagreement wid! Mr. GiIuting:. COIICIus1o~. In the documents sqpponing the MEC appllcalÌolI, and in the !C6Ùnlony which was proviclc:d at the·previO\lS,Commlsslan·hcarins·by boùnn.·ptOpOllents"aa4-0pp0nCßÞJ there was much disc....ion:ofthe exJnlng 1II1II \lSC'concli'ri01\S'in the area. - · Ap,,03-Z0ij' , From-'REEN6ER' ¡''''RIG pA. ~"""'" 5(;1832462(; 15616556ZZ2 T,,'50 -...; ..." P 004/00 ----._- -> 84/82/2881 18;45 a:nTRELt.. PAGE 84 Alfi'ed MaJefllltO Apri12,2001 Pa¡¡e ThrecIMEC Clearly the most promine¡¡lllUIJi WiCS in the area = the FPL sub!lation loclllðd /IOuth. the oVethead I'PL tl'lUlSmissionIÏJIÐ., andtbe T.ropiomaplanl, theJondjill UId other industrial facilities locaœa east. The area is abo deñnc:d by the proximity ofl-95 JUSt CAsllllld the Turnpike funher OA!Il,and the we of Midway Roadu. ILIntnSiI rowe· for tnICb twuI¥Ig citrUS fi'om westem producing =aa to the Tropicona plllllt. ' The land uaeundthe-developmentpmem:io the """" wbio¡ï'are proltl0te<! and supported by the. exi.niUß transportation =wcrks, establish this area as primarily industrial ill oat\¡fO. The ease of ,""cosund hIsIt visibility~ 'bytbeautTOUmÜJlg roadways promote !Iifh intensity co=c:n:W and miJced use development ÌIt1IIIediately ar the 1-95 inœrcluuige, with a nansition u> Jow« inlen.ity us~fartl=·ftoltlthe·inrerelUlnge. Agrlculturalïl"'s (onn the weSIen1 cd¡¡e of this pu=_ The exístioecondirions Conn the logical basis for a¡¡ ordt>rl}t a¡¡¡ ..!O~ development pattern which 8<c in keeping wltb tbe lan4 lISe lI1I.nIiúona calJed for ill the CornptdlCll!live Plan. Conlnlr)/·ro·Mr. Olallill8'ø·l'O"itioQ;·tbC'sitirrg·oftheproposcdMEC·a~ weatom c:dge of me urban service boundazy is in kcepins With thi, developmcnr pancm. It 1$ of relatively low Inten$ity,ili.sa·~ ow1l'1lffie-gt=8lùr¡¡c 'irwill"l101 bring uaffiç ~ me area, it does nOt depend on, nor encolII'IIge. the ço..location of 0Ibcr incllØ!rial ac¡Jvities or uses, IUId it will nOI causø . "creepint' ofoomm=rcieluses whicIi fëads to strip paTterns or deve!oplllenllUld sprawl. Inhis'IIIm1O/'lllldU!li Mr; Glattiag =martlll~propo9cd=lIÍn¡¡ is''ill,co~1 with "the sound plllll1Úng principal contained in the ¡oab, objectives and policies" of me COlII ItCbensive PIIll1; sinçc-ilwt!l·a1Iow·IIr!·"ï..a¡.I"¡)I',Alllmtuse 10 encroach upon the-approved resickatial neigbbothood". We disagree that the proposed f,¡cility will have an ÍInP8ct 011 resiclelllial ru:igbborl1oods: The only existio¡ l'C9ideatial devdOpmel1l is a f~ nearby farm residenççs. The development plan fur the proposed facility bas accommodarc:d sufficient separation A1Id bu1fering to protect these residences. The LTC Ranch dcovelopmcnt plan allows greAI tlexibUity in tbc locasion ofits approved uses, IUId the developmCIII Is large enough to provide Appropriate bufferinç for futon: residenrial·II!'CII9.·· Further;givCltthe-siÇllifielllll pl'e3en« 1>fthe-FPL Sll,bstalion. ÙIe overhead tranSmission lines and ÙIe IlllldfiU, il is unlikely that the lItCa would IIttÍ1ICt new reøidential dcvelopmem. Wc·bavo-coneludcd,·th=fore-;tbc-proposed MEC baa.,no irnpacl on existing, approved or planned residCDtial neigl¡borboods. Mr.Glattingeontaldnlluth<rfacilit)"wouIdre81lltlrrsi¡¡ui1ic..ut ~ in;1pacts on ~e na~ environmcnt. We have relied on tho proofs subaùne4 by omCll' (!>¡.pcrts rc'IaIned regarding noIse, emiSIlÍOrl;..andwarerUlO'....sufficicntdi~ these marœt3. ~ Apr-D3-ZDD I From-GREENBERG TRI"-' r,. ' . "- ....... 64/62/2301 18'45 5618324626 15616556m COTmEI..L T_7'-"t PDD5/DD5 -"",; PAGE 65 , AIfi'ed Ma!e~!tO ApriJ 2, 2001 Page Four/MEC Wean: not inllflll'CU1ent with Mr. G ¡min8·~~senionlbal.·th"reqllCS~relD\1ing is in conflict willi the public in=t, ~ we have c:osu:1Qded Iiw the proposed Illes an: consisœnl with the goalnná·requJremenl8ofthcCoUlltyComprebeøsivo·Plaztand·Land ÐcYc1"opmen¡ Code, Iiw tho developll1CAI is appmpriaœ for the site, and 1baIlhe MBC &cility wiD have 110 a4VCTSe impact on rhtllllj='parcdsofbmdorOJrrhtsc=m'area: ~carefuI revi_ of Mr.. GJaning's anaIysisand-conclusion5'COIU¡Iincd witbln his memorandum, we romain convince4 dw !he rezoning which is proposed is IIppropriaœ for the s¡Ie, and offers ·noa4vCl'liC-laudusc·impaçœ ro-1bc-1II'Ca; ñ:l~. _^ ~~ ~CP . ^. Apr-OJ-1001 From-GREENBERG ~I~A /.V~-UN I II: 12 Arr O~ 01 05:12p -' ""'1 ~-\CD P.006/01 Job-m +5616556121 ~·.Dl' PAUL H. Fa.£ItMAN "",0 SOUTHEAST CITIlUS CAPITAL CORPORATION lJ~.()IŒ£CHOBEE ROAD FT. PŒJtC&, noa.oJA 34945 TEL¡¡:~HONE 561-468-9150 Apnl 2. 200 I Hon. Clitrord B...... Couu¡y Col!1llWsionet S,. Lucie Cowny, P1orw. 2300 Vtr:uûa Avenue F'L Pi"""', Florida 34982 By Hand DeIi."'Y Rt: MidW1f)' Em:r¡:y Caller ~ COI1UIIÌsÅoucr &W'S, As.yoa.may..>=l1.¡.aœ.OÓC-ot'·"'" OWIIeB·ohhe·...u,...;1;Y i---Ihtlriy"nonI>-or!be propooc:d MidwDy E..c:&> Ccmcr. No tho: p.hIic b<ari"" or Mud. >D, 2001, t __. '" .... appn>Yal or 1I>c faålil) booed oa numerous COIICOnUI we had as an acljacczu ....."....y -..cr. Hc\oocYer."""", d>e Muct>. 20th m""",,& my p:u'I1SCS' :lad I· /1ave-'1\ad' scvctaI·~;u1IS·wim·Mr. .~ Krause or E'rirop. and Eiuon IuIs ~ I ,~.u of 01>< COØõCm5 On b:baIf or "'" puUICt' aDd lØyoc1f. ... "'" ~ to adoioo )'OU ..... <10 loa¡¡or appose the Midway Energy eclUcr pt'l!Jcct, We _ )'ØU fòc your ""'" ibid wnccm ... C\o'1d\RllÏlll. aad odårcSsiDg a ma= as importaQl as the appIIcal.lOI1 fur ~aI or a f; ciIi\)'ofthis.\)' >O.. We.aIso.'W""'·'· )<XU: ,........;~ 1O( e I:r l1l18I CONIcle:nl1ion to IÙIOw fQl' d>e lime 10 <houg/1¡ i¡ Jy ~)'Om' do<:<Iioa. WIIaIe\'CI' it 1IIA¥ bc:. Based.... bur _all<>nS .." f",,1 colDfonabIC INI1 yOOl ¡q¡¡ Ihc otl>ct CX>ØJmÍSSio~ have c::aæfUIIy..co~.d>e.~~ wiU ~"'" I:Ia>cd on YOtIt iD~VidUatëN~uatioN. We wiU "",be abluo_1hc "'............nn p>n;OI1oCyour¡aoblü: bcoIring. due: lØourbciDgouloCtOWII 00 ¡,ndn... However, sinoo.'~ publi<> .....""8 is.<>nJ¡. o_...._\lW.._~ 10 speak due 10 tb.: lme Mur of !be m<x:IÍJ1& ..e do 1101 bave aø)'1hing 10 ad<!. j.I!Ja¡,k-y<>u.j'onbc.opporDIDI'Yto-oddrcas}'Oø anh"pubIic'''''ætn¡r;uut~ 0XICDded IØ me. PH!'/owl . p." ,'Jar 29 I : 14p '- "- 56~~2e III' : . . . . ., FLORIDA FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANIES 3327 Orange Avenue' Fort Pierce, PL 34947 . Phone: 561.465.0440 561.87]. 183 . Fax: 561.465.0428 March 29, 200 I The Honorable Fran Hutchinson, Chairman St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Florida 34987 Re: Proposed Enron Power Plant Location Dear Chairman Hutchinson, On behalf of the Executive Board of Dírectors of the St. Lucie County Farm Bureau, r wish to have the following Comments entered into the Official Public Record for Public Comment with regard to the above referenced Power Generation FacHity. The Fanner Membership of the Sf. Lucie Farm Bureau is in general support of the placement of Next Generation Efficient Power Generating Facilities within St. Lucie County and further, wishes to commend the several Energy Companies presently considering the location of New Facilities in our county, as a benefit to the provision of stab]e and cost effective sources of electric power to the excising industry, agricuJture and consumer base in our local area. We, however, do have some very real concerns with regard 'to the placement of these facilities within Agricultural Productions Areas, specifically the demand for existing water resources required to serve the proposed Power plants, and the seeming lack of existing or proposed water recharge facilities to compensate for the 1,000,000 + gallon per day demand that the proposed plants are reported to require for operation. As you may be aware, whcn planning for the construction of even a small agricultural operation, such as a 40 acre citrus grove, approximately 17%t020% of tile total land area must be utilized to facilitate the water resource requirements of both state and local agencies, quite often restùting in a water retention facility designed for both retention and discharge attenuation purposes. This in addition to SFWMD requirements for the installation of low-volume inigation systems and filter marsh plantings for water quality enhancement. While not being able to review detailed. plans for the proposed 100+ acre Enron Facility, Our Board has cons that future impacts to water resources in the immediate area of the Facility have not been properly address, with consideration to the surrounding attachment II 4 .' (~~ì to\bœ~ . p.l -" - . ,- ...JOJ......O;;)U"1'~t;I p.2 ......~ - -' I'll dO! FLORIDA FARM BUREAU INSURÅ.NCB COMPANIES 3327 Orange Avenue' Fort Pierce, FL 34947' Phone: 561.465.Q44O 561.871.1183· PAx: 561.465.0428 Agricultural Properties. Further, within St Lucie County, there exists adequate Industrial Zoned Property, within established Industrial Parks and Facilities, which are designed to accommodate the expected impacts to water, transportaion, and public facilities. It is Our position, that the Proposed Facility should be more properly located within one of the existing Industrial Areas already Zoned to accommodate the Proposed Facility. In closing, Thank You for the opportunity to present the above comments. On behalf of Our County\vide Membership. Respectfully Submitted, ~ f)4,~ Philip P. Strazzulla, President St. Lucie County Farm Bureau . - ." ·j,,- Rick Minton Io.f ...., -" 2100 Sunrise Blvd. Suite A * Fort Pierce, FL 34950 Mm:h 2£1, æm.. !DR) CFax:NIY ~ Saint LtJci~County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34981 Rick Minton. Realty,. .Inc., Realtor, was·never·c:ontacted.. by'E2mOO" regardili\9 the purchase of industrial properties located in Saint Lucie COtInty. '. There are industrial parcels available throughout the county. Sincerely, BlIIÎI1eu (S61)A6'-13S0.* Fu..(S61).467-1138. SA ~, w w ~ ...._.....u... oJ... ................ ~ran" "". t......., -213-1 at J/2'YI""¡l...113- ~ 1 page of two Richard Lindquist. MA 11650 Appal~ Court (pony Pines) Port Saint J..ucie; Fl34987 %1..2520 c-mail: aceshoer@aoJ.com Saint Lucie-Çounty Commissioners Esteemed Commissioners. I ama'con=edcitizenofS1IÌnI:LUcie'County residing in the-"{ea southwest (mostly west) of the Ilv.. proposed peeker plants. 1, my f.amily and many others residomls are living directly downwind in wlult will be the particulate "fallout zone" fi'om the emissions of1hese five plants. At this time I am vigorously opposed to a.Ilowing five of the$e plants to löcate in our county. 1 am particularly OJ!PO!'ed to '!Ie present proposal to spot ZOM the Midway Road site for the Enroa plant Tbe latter ¡,,¡ for economic IJ well IJ quality oflife (health) reasons. It oolongs, if anywhere, in a p~ly zoned industrial site. The effects of the emissions &om the proposed Enron plant were discussed in the last Commissioners' meeting; There are two·other·ve¡yimportant'ðI1,vironmental questions that had no or only the barest of dÎBCIIS6ion tb.at late night, The "gray water" used by four of tile- five proposed·plants·will be-emitted as- steam during~tion .ofthcsc plants as well as part of the emissions when fossil fuels are burned. "Gray wat..r" is conbu............·'l\'ith-lOmethln!!; Whot'wiUbe-the'impact"ofthe~lates that will faU back to earth &om these contAminAnts? Further and moat importantly, what will be the eombtJled.efreett·oftheso-and the-other known·plltticulates· from.~ five proposed plants on the Iong-tenn health and quality oflife for the citizens ofSamt Lucie County? (etiÞedaDvthoædawnwindohllliveo(tm vrovoRed v]ants) I There was much "Science" presented at the last commissioners mæting. Being a person of s<:iern:e-myse!fI·urgo-yOll toconsiderth.o-following: . Scientific 'facts" II1'ct·simply.tI¡e best knowledge we have at thi: moment that have not yet been disproved. Value the sciencc;Ð&not.forget,- however;that·it'islu1thlwayr;wilI·be·~d to our" beat prese:ot knowledge". A3 mcb" the sc:ie:oti1ic predictions on the effects ofthcse five combined p!alllSdeserve-yourcautious'skeptieismnndcarefuld;:liberationc ~istol)' ¡s replete with exIUIIples ofblind relillnee on "best present knowledge" resulting in environmental disaster. B~pccially.lccptictdwhen1hese"'faClS" are-pres~ by paid experts hired by those with vested, striet1y economic interests in the mAtter. I am in great hopes tht: Boardw11J.foUowilirough-on theiJo.plllfttoconsu¡t~n~ experts on the matter. Further, I hope these independent experts will be available for in depth questionsftom the·publica!... reasonable hour dw}?g-the nem or some-future- Comrnis5ioners-~ing.- U'- 002/0 , . . . .....- .....- .._" ...""... ~v,"" .,.n "".'/.".....". ..J. '-''-,.............. ........... nU.'J r=" to' 46~131 at 312912001...,.t3 p¥ 20f2 Allow·meto·comm~t on·the genera! ið~a..ofthese-power plarJm\ocating in our county. No one ever died lÌ'om a lack of electricity. Ind~. far more people die from electricity than: fi:om' being' without it; Thesc'1\I'e'no'doubt ·.strange·sou~ words to your ears. I say them. fpr two reasons.. . " First; I say them to remindYlJllhunuuùty once lived quite nicely wilhout electricity. 11ús is hard to appreciate in today'. energy dependent society. Nonetheless, we will not die if ourpowe1"~·out.· SomeofmY'fellow citi=,'however; ~ to harbor a fear they will. This is the fcar the power industry i. playing upon behind'''their z=ert1on: "look at the-situ.ation-inCalifomia;. youneedthcse·peekeT"plank". Seo"l.'dly, we here in South Roñda. will not need these plants for their electricity if we do two things. 1) Learn to live more- come:rvatiwly . ð~ di..g otIf'energy'consumptlOIl: ('Ibe-'l~ energy dependent we are as a society they healthier we will be as a society) 2) Vigorously promote in per.¡onal and ·politicals¡>Mres the· developn'len! of natural renewable ~ergy resources tlUch as solar. wind and hydroelectric. It is inconceivable that here in the bind of perpetual sunshine-the' state'doeS'So'!1ttleto- proú.atethedevelopment- ~d use of solar power. Finally, there is the assertion recommending approval of these plants that they will increase our tax b""",· lwott dcounterwfth·three-~ I) Wbat impact will decreased property values around the"" planm bave on the tax base? 2) What CQOI1omic impactwillthere-be- OIttheCounty'"ifmany·lIVerage-to·hig!t-a'lerage income citizens surrounding these plants decide to mOVe out of tho area for quality of life reasons? These citizen¡;-wi1Itake their ¡a1'ge dispo&abtc ¡B"omes-and·theif$pcndin~ habits with them. The immMiate effect on our tax base might be a net gain but wba! about the Iong.term eftèct? Demog¡ apb;c:sdo-sbiftcrvet"'issues-likethilt;but-thqahiihlowf;y. If all oftbeso plants are approved foe our area., I lII}'>elfwill find it difficult to justifÿ te>m.ining a Saint Lucie Coumy res4lent for the long term. 1bank you fur your consideration of these commen1s and efforts for our county in this matter. Richard LiPdquist MA 't:J....... 003/01 UJ/ ~l!/ LUUl ;':'U.:'¡J FAA :'¡ül<lti"L¡Jl 31' LliC 11::: cu AlJ~1 ¥ ...." Ralph "Gap" Cain m De....!oÞment OoII"ultant LlD___d·Rea1.e.ta_ JIn)~r .17'0"1". ___a II: LåÅI Þ ...... .... L_ .... _ PII--.:·~ t.. --~ Faz: 114111'1'-119. Marçb 29,2001 Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft..l'ierce,Florida 34982 Re: Remningofthe.Cooney. property.to accommodate the Enron Corporation Dear Commission=: I represent the LTC Ranch Joint Venture and TJH Limited, property owners who border the Cooney property to the south and east; These'two properties. represent an estimated.. 2,600 acres designated fur residenûal development. My clieDts oppose the rezoning of the Cooney property to accommodate the development ora peak power plant; The County· Commissionnow has the respønsibilityof determining how this rezoning will impact St. Lucie County, adjacent resideDts and property owners. r am writing this letter asking each, of you to- consider the adverse-impact and.deyelopment pattern changc YoU will create by locating a power plant adjacent to a proposed quality residential neighborhood. The St_ Lucie County Commission, according to the Land Development Code, is required to consider the extent to which the proposed arnendment isinconsistent·withtheexisting-. and proposed land uses. A PNRD permits creative approaches to development of nonresidential Janel, allows design options that encourage an environment of stable' character compatible with surroundingJand uses, and permits the enhancement of neighborhoods through the preservation of natural features. Clearly, the proposed rezonÌi1,8 for the powerpbmt is ßotcompatible..with.the.existing 1and uses in the area or the proposed residential development of the property located to the east and soutlL The standards of review in the County's Land Development Code also requires the Commission to considetwhether and·the extenttowlùch the proposed amendmentwt>U4\ resuh in an orderly and logical development pattern, specifically identifying any negative effects. This power plant will alter the development pattern of the surroundingproperti~ andhave a neg:ltive effect on PJ'Operty. values. Your own staff's report clearly states that the PNRD will provide for a change in the overall development pattern in the surroundìn6; area. We agree with.yourstaE.sassessmen1sinœthe 2,067 acres immediately south of the property to be rezoned has already been approved for 6,500 residential units. The St. LucÏc CoW1ty Development Code also requires the Commission to consider whether and the extent to which the propoSCIhmendmentwould advcrselyimpacl·tJ¡e. natural environmcnt.l understand that the Commission believes the SFWMD is the agency responsible for reviewing and dcterrnin.ing whethèr the water requested' by this facility,~ attachment II 5 i(!] 01 """ -' reasonable or bannfulto·tbesurrounding·properties. ME, Weinberg;· with·Water.ResollICf:.. Sohrtions, reviewed the infunnation presented by Enron to the SFWMD and reported to you that their own report refl'ects a negative impact on the quan1ityofwell production-fur, existing wells in a three mile radius. Mr. Weinberg also stat~d the powa plant could cause: a deterioration of the quality of groundwater in the upper Floridan aquifèr over time. I'I-",n"" of this rezoning. request, I believe the CommissÌDn has a rcspoDSibility to review and address this issue as it has a negative effect on the environment of the surrounding properties. The noise level'assessment .....J~I taken by. Hessler Associates. . Inc., on behalf ofthe.EmoJl. Plant referenced two standards. The first is the St. Lucie Zoning Code, which is 60 dBA -fur daytúne and 55 dBA fur night1Ïine operation, and the second 'isthenational standardut values of 48 dBA. The report goes on to say that the sound leyel &om Enron at full capacity will be predicted at 48 dBA at the closest residence. The closest residence is 1;56,0 feet.a.way_lf.the so.u11d level is 48 dBA at residences 1, 560 feet away, it will surely be greater than that at the propçrty line of rhe proposed residenrial neighborhood to the east. ~t appears.thatacoordi!lg.totheirownreport.they surely .violate the 48 dBA national standard and will probably violate the 55 dBA county standard at the propçrty line to the east. Please UIIderstand that my clients are not opposed to power plants. They are in support of them, provided they do oot adversely affèct surroundingproperties~ By . locating this 'povlI:I' plant in existingindustriaJJ.y zoned property, you would eliminate the compatible use issue and provide absorption of industrial inventory in the County. There would be no impact·1Ip surronndi'1g property values and the power company could be in a position to purchase . water &om an existing utility. eliminating the negative impact on our ground water supply. There are two plants proposed in the LTC Ranch Industria! Park, which are adjacent to each otncr. LTG agreedtn' a nonocompetc-c]ause;whicb ~liminates. any .additional po.lM:t plants WÍIhin their Park. However, there are numerous industrially zoned parcels ofland, which could accommodate tIilii type of facility: Ihavcprovided·the-Commissíol1·witho~ site adjacent to Rangt\ Line Road. It is my understanding that property also exists in the . industrial park where Duke Energy is locating. I am confident that other realtÓfS would'~ happy to. pro:vide..indust:1ial"zoned property for consideration. TheMidwayRoadcorridoristhelast.fPmJlini"gwindaw intoSt. Lucie County, The real question is, how does St. Lucie County want this window to look. ...-? - RCUIlcc '-' ..,..I Tetephone 56ì-4~-SELL (7355) Fax. 561-468·1810 & ASSOClATES- 107North2iïdSt.., Ft.P¡e~c:e. FL 34950 ... . March 27, 200 ¡ Mr. Doug Anderson., County Administrator 51. Lucie County 23 CO Virginia Ave. . Ft. Pierce, FL149S0. Dear Doug: I was reaJly surprised to read in the newspaper that Enron said it had contacted area brokcrs about alternative land btlt no one responded. J tind t/Us hard to believe. especiaUy since w.ehave 13 5. acres. in north.Fort.Pierce which .is zoned hea.")' industrial. . Y oumay_ recall tha! at one time you and the County considered purchasing it. I also want to voice my objections to Enron's proposed site from one basic point. spot zOlÙng sets a bad precedent for the Cëunty. . Sincerely. CJ~-r~ ? JoAon Allen-Kofoed JAK:k v'" CC: Commissioners Barnes, Bruhn, Coward, Hutchinson,. and. Lewis . _. f'tIOtt: THIS OFFEJUNO 5UPJECTTO aROAS, OMISSJONS. PRIOR. SALE OR :wmtDR^WAL WIrnOtIT NOTICE. '- ...,,; Tbom~8 R.L, Kindred, Sr. 1905 Wyoming Avenue Ft; Pif:rœ, Florida 34982 . Marcb 27, 2001 ' The Board of County Commissioners St-Lw:ie County, Florida 2300 Virginia Avenue fort¡ Pierce, Florida 34982 Dear Commissioners: Each'ofyou"lœowthatlreptesented Dr.' Hendler-ofHHHP PFop¡:nies for several years and now also represent Mr. Jim Hall along wilb Cap Cain. Yes, I have a vested interest in OJIPosingthere-zoning-oftheCooney'~site;lamalsoa'concerned~rizen and do not feel it is in Ibe county's best interest to r~zone this property. I know that tougb decisions come with your jobs espedally·wben·it comes-to·increasing·tax dollars.. Howcver, SQ/IIetimes the long-term benefits arc overlooked becausc of possible sbon-term gains. I can rememberwherrit waS' thoughtthattheReserve;' St: LucieWest a¡¡d the P _G.A. were just speculative projects and would never materialize. I Ibink you can be proud to say Ibay arc part of our county; When you· look-aUhe quality developl!\Cftt'pattem in·OIJF ,c0"l'ty it is emulating trom south to north and I sincerely feel it is in our best interest to continue this pattern of developmeut. I also"fceHhatthe're--zoning-ofthis propcrtyandtbe-constnlctÌono£.a utility plant could be nothing sbort of disastrous for any future quality development along the Midway Road corridor west ofl-9S. I knowtbat·yotr will, but'hnust askY01nnyway to'please' consida'-the, long term beneñts of a quality development project verses a r~zoning request to permit a project which is out of ebaraeter. but C81I be accommodated elsewhere in tbe eounty. Thomas R.L. Kindred, Sr. ce. Mr. Doug Anderson, County Admin_ _. . ) ...;/ 19Ø47::iSlIò1:::' MAK-~0-01 U8:26 PM F ¥ vi , The BoardofCoutl\y Commissioners St. Lucie County, Florida 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pic~ce, Florida 34982 Dear Commissioners: This letter is in opposition to the re-zoning of the proposed Enron sit~. Do we honestly need the tax dollar so badly that you are willing to Ie-zone a residential! agricultural piece of property to utility because of the convenicnce it'would possess'for a utility company?l am sorry, I know as County Commissioncrs you have several decisions to make for the well being of ollr county, but the concems of the citizens should be held in high regard. Do not aHow our community to beeomea'dumpilT& ground for every power plant (and truck stop) to come in here and pollute our area. Enclosed is a letter to the editor that we submitted today. ~incerdY, (). . ./ t·t-v'\, t'LAt\... . . J / /~t?'7;<¡;L/ . .~.ý Kevmand Ronna Pe~' attachment II 6 t-'.ul " ~ ¥ '-' AttentionS!. Lucie-County Residents, How many of you miss shoppingat our "own" mall? Not so long ago it was ll/;neccssary to leave the county to enjoy a day ofshppping.Many of us did not, realize that· as we ventured out of our own county to shop, WI( were putting our own county business' oul of business' How we wish the Orange Blossom Mall and othcr area business' that are now gone, were still in operation' Many of us can remember Midway Road, in White City; whc\I it was residential and agricultural. Currently, there are several industrial type plants located in the vicinity of Midway Rd. and Glades Cut Off Rd. Reeent1y, several power plant corporations have submitted proposals to locate in that same vicinity. A zone change from industrial to utility was recently granted to Duke Corporation to locate their power plant on Glades Rd. Enron Corporation is present1y requesting a rezoningchange.inan area.adjaeentto residents and agrieultu~al properties.This property is west of the confined industrial areas. Imagine driving down Midway Rd. or 1-95, what an attractive sight, several towers and powell lines everywhere. Yes, we need power plants, but not so c10seto residential.and.agricultural areas. And, do we need five power plants all within the same area? We can only imagine what the immediate and'!ong term effects will be on our surrou~ing environment! SL Lucie County residents, do not wait' Once these power plants are built, they can not be removed! To oppose Enron's proposal for a land zone change, write and phone'your county commissioners now! Bclow is·the CouI1\?' Commissioners . Office address and phone number. Write and call now before the serenity of White City is gone forever. April 3, @ 7:00, will be the next meeting on this proposa1. Come out in support of "opposing" this·proposal·fOf a..land zone change. Concemed Residents, KevìI\ and Ronna Perry THEBOARD OF COUNTY C?MMISSlONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE . Fr. PIER(,E~ FLORIDA 34982 561-462-1100 ...____.~,_._. .u. '__'~'__'____"'__'__"_"'_.__'___ ".---- Kevin and Ronna Perry 5080 W. Virginia Dr. Fr. Pierce, Fl. 34981 561-595~9602W.46l-7323 _. ) / / ',-, ..., From: North Fork Property Owners 2630 Rainbow Drive Fort Pierce, Fla. 34981-5009 TO: Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Fla. Re: Re-Zoning ITom AG-1 and AG-2.5 to PNRD. Midway Energy Center (File No.RZ-00-018, PUD 00-013 and MJSP 00-012) Midway Development Company LLC Preliminary PNRD for 116.6 acres. And a final PNRD for 35.97 acre tract that would be developed into an SID-megawatt, electric generation facility. Dear County Commissioners, The North Fork property owners were asked to participate in this public hearing by property owners in the area. The North Fork Property owners after having been involved in the process that created PNRD's, to protect the stability of property owners finds that in this instance the following: This PNRD does not appear according to the concept of the PNRD to be consistent. 1. It is not consistent with the Purpose and Intent ofLDR's found in section 1.02.00. Encourage the most appropriate use ofland water and resources; preserve and enhance the value of land and the character and stability of residential, agricultural etc/. , 2. 1.03.01 It shall be unlawful for any person to carry out any development that is inconsistent with the requirements of this Code and the Comprehensive Plan. 3. 1.04.01 B. Controlling the location, design and construction of development with,in the unincorporated are of St. Lucie County is necessary attachment II 7 '- ...., to maintain and improve the quality of life in the County and to protect the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. PNRD: Is intended to achieve non-residential land development of superior quality through the encouragement and creativity in design options that. 7.02.01 C. Allow for design options that encourage an environment of stable character, compatible with sUJ,Tounding land uses; and D. Permit the enhancement of neighborhoods through the preservation of natural features, etc. 7.02.02 A. the compatibility of the proposed use(s) with the surrounding land uses. All applications for Planned Nonresidential development shall include a complete identification of all planned uses and activities. This PNRD is not consistent: We question a PNRD for 116 acres when 41.56 of these acres will remain in different ownership. This PNRD application should be 2 separate PNRD's as it appears that this property will have two different owners. Parcel A (Lot 1): It appears will be retained in ownership by Mr. Cooney. Parcels B & C ( Lot 2 & 3) to be owned by Enrons. As a homeowners group we would not want to see this PNRD circumvent what we thought were requirements and thereby set a precedent for future changes in St. Lucie County that were not consistent. This property as it appears it will be owned by two different entities does not meet requirements under [H.] that state: For developments projects often (10) acres or more a minimum of thirty- five (35) percent of the gross area ofland to be committed to a PNRD must be for the use of parks etc. Therefore the possibility exists that it is not consistent and will not be in compliance with the standards. Parcel A (Lot I): Cooney is stated under final PNRD to have a minimum of 1. 7 acres of open space when the figure based 41.56 acres on a separate PNRD should be approximately 14.56 acres. This Parcel A or Lof 1 has no specificity as required it just some day might be commercial. "- ""'" Also we are quite concerned with requirements of 40 feet additional right of way along Midway Road. It states prior to, or as part of the [mal platting of the subject property. Who conveys this pro~rty and when does , Cooney, or Enrons constructs the right and left turn lanes, and in what time ftarne? Based on item [5 of page 5 of March 13, 2001] paperwork. [Does this mean that a C/O could be issued prior to the lanes being constructed. ] Previously no maps have been presented that show the nursery to the West, nor the trend for the AgriculturalJResidential Estates that exist to the west. . We realize the tax base that this plant would generate, provided they did ' not receive a tax abatement. This plant could still locate in our county on one of the indus1rial properties that are available St. Lucie County according to what a letter written by: -------------- Rick Minton Realty on March 28,2001 that stated Rick Minton Realty Inc, was never contacted by Enron regarding the purchase of indus1rial properties located in St. Lucie County. There are indus1rial parcels available throughout the county. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ If this company should choose not to locate in St. Lucie County we then would have a total of 4 instead of 5. It appears that I plant is already permitted, and including this one 4 more could be in our county. Respectfully yours, <it~ ~ w..-rl(f}tt~ North Fork Property Owners C. Jackson! Sect. Treasurer Patricia Ferrick, Governmental Representative. .. 10'.1 <\4.6 "'u 'I I· ~/IZ- "'W , c , , c , , 313.91 1 1 , I( I' 102.29 vARN GAO\IES INC. 30.60 95,23 IJ.'ill5 393.a3 29,43 :3 " O.l.C. INC. O.l,C, INC. DONALD ' HENDLER FOR Ht+tP ASSOC. CRAN C£NTAAl CORP. I' " ""'OlD & AOA 'MlUA~S SR. ~' õ\, ~ ~I 5 ;:;1 134 '~U6 '~9.2' R"Y HOOD GRO'ÆS INC. 3·'-22 ER U N 038.215 28.6 1.~; R",Y HOOD Lo.I .c;RO'ÆS I ð:s: ~ PAUL IS-<i INe. FREEuAN Q, 0( ,..1 I :š .. UI I . ~.1~ëòOOE'!':"" < ~:: :a NAVAJO m{[.,MIDWAY;~"':"I' ¡!: I CROI¡(S INe. &i~OVES.'t~,~ i ~ I 4e.5I ~~.F(~ï,~ii ~ ~,.. .."",,' ";'I'~l~O' '. I i j' ~;i'i ~t~.i;.,,·.'t . ~ ~ Q, . ~ J~r (j~oVt~.~: ~ = % tJ ;i.. = rJ,¡,p;I' i~:'~, ~ . ~~ Hi, ~~.<)r,,)/, ....~ ~\. ~ :"'.l'."I".!i.!I: ~ -< ." I t- LI" :i~,ISt.;: ~ i3 "r' ?i.". \,<:' 3 " ..::1'- VMTE aN Road :9.~:! - - - - -35- , ¡- - 294.69 ,.J O¡)N.r.LD HENDlER FOP. HHH. ASSOC. .26.4 139.6' CONALD HENDLER 'OR H.H.H,P PROPERtiES DO~IAlD HENDLER FOR H.H.H.P. I'RCfERTI(S LTC JON' \(tHUR( LTC JOINT VENTURE HARRIS CORP, FlORIDA FLORIDA _ POW(R .. POwER is &: LIGHT &: UGHT ::; CO. CO. Ò 19.'5 26.23 ~ LTÇ :e~ ~ ,JOINT ~ h « 'ÆNTURE ';:w 9 -~ I ~~ 22.67 ~~l ., "- o rLORI[)A PO'M:R 31.01 & LTC LICHT JOINr 59.36 V'ENT\JR( LTC ~ JOINT V vtNTURE G . ~ 10 0 159.89 c 0 ~ G ~ ~ ~ LTC 0 .. C JOINT ~ ~ V(NIUR£ ~ .. ¡.. 139.9 425.53 Z 0< a: "'"" ~ Q ..." 0< " LTC JOItH 0 V'ENTUR[ .- -" ~) -" ^ :~~.O2 CITY or PORT St.LUCI( 81.6 74,1 '-' ...", Mrs. ARLENE GOODMAN 4412 PRESSLER LANE FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34982 St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 Dear Madam Chairman Hutchinson and Board Members, Re: Rezoning of the Cooney Property from AG-1 and AG-2.5 to PNRD I request that this letter be a part of the minutes of this meeting. My name is Arlene Goodman and I reside at 4412 Pressler Lane. I am a business woman and have been since 1975. I was a Real Estate Salesman for General Development Corporation and Florida Home Finders from early 1970 to early 1981 when I opened my own Real Estate office until the mid 1990. My husband is a Real Estate Broker in White City. . We moved here in 1968 and have raised 5 children because of the beautiful beaches on the coast and for the country atmosphere in White. City. We have watched, since 1968 St. Lucie County grow in a mainly, straigh~ line -not much in the way of quality, but much in the way of quantity. In the past few years, however, we have seen a tremendous change in '. the movement to quality. attachment II 8 ..... -' The North/West corridors of Pt. St. Lucie and the SW corridor of Wlùte City has seen much growth in the way of up-scale housing, The Reserve and others -Golf Courses; Hotels; Mets Stadium as well as restaurants and movie theaters; all in the area off 1- 95 at St. Lucie West--Prima Vista Boulevard, as we older residents remember it. The LTC Ranch has been in the planning stages for years, I was Administrative Assistant to the then County Commissioner Dale Trefelner when the plans were the owners first approached the County for this development and I was here when the DR! came through in the mid 1990's. Now they are ready to move forward with nice upscale homes; golf courses; mixed neighborhoods of residential and commercial uses all in the same general area as the EnRon Corporation wishes to build it's "peak" power plant. The piece of property in question has a much higher and better use than a power plant; look at other interchanges up and down 1-95 from Miami to Maine; look at the interchange at Vero Beach with the impressive stores and restaurants. Interchanges encourage people to stop and eat or to look around your city; what do we want to show " people at the Midway Road Interchange; shops and motels or power lines. Our county is rich in its ability to grow and sell fruit and vegetables; some are purchased by countries overseas; that fruit they buy goes out of our Port. Those countries are very particular as to t.he looks and quality of the fruit they will accept. "-:' ...., We need to keep our air clean and our water clean and plentiful so these countries,will continue to purchase our fruit. As you are aware, this has been a very dry year. I was reminded that an orange grove Could pull more water than some power plants, maybe, but the water goes back into the ground; it is not evaporated into the air with the saline left-overs falling onto our farm . lands and our homes. We can live without fruit true, but we can not live without cleanlsafe water and the drawing down of our water in such large amounts may bring problems to our future water supply. I refer to a letter sent to Commissioner Bhrun on March 19, 2001 by Jack Hebb, who Is knowledgable in Agriculture and whose opinion I greatly respect. In that letter he is very concerned about future water usage and future costs of it to us all. Allow me to read a couple lines to you. Cities south of us are having the same problems with placement of peak power plants, as we-are. U.S. Representative Robert Wexler a Democratic from Florida is speaking out in opposition; Commissioners and Mayors are doing the same: Becky Tooley; Kristin Jacahes; Illene Liberman McGinn; Skalnik; Shelly and over 500 people who live in the Pompano Beach area. They are speaking against the placement---not the plants...they are voicing their concerns; looking for more information as to the health and welfare of their families and their businesses. ....... ....." Four (4) cities have filed requests to delay the permits so they (cities) can petition for an administrative hearing. We too need more unbiased information. Information on the health to St. Lucie residents living down-wind of the plant. Of the health of the cattle who feed off the grasses that may be affected by the fall out down-wind and for the health of the fruit that is growing down-wind that we all eat. You have been chosen by the residents of St. Lucie County to watch over our health, . safety and welfare and your first line of concern is for our well-being. I feel you are looking at the LARGE TAX BASE EnRon may produce each year and not at the long term affects this may have on the residents and businesses in our future. We spend a lot of tax money through the Chamber to bring in new businesses. We spend a lot of tax money with the Tourist Development Council to bring new visitors to our County; what do we want to show them? Homes and nice eateries and golf courses or "stack-poles: Are we fighting ourselves or will we be shooting ourselves in the foot for a "few" dollars that may be derived from this plant? I hope we are not selling ourselves to the highest bidder. Money is not everything- when the plant is finished in about 18 months and the 150 to 200 jobs are gone-what happens and who cares; you are still here and so are we. You and we are one and the same, all residents who share a beautiful county. Take into consideration the build-out of the LTC Ranch Development and the 2 proposed other developments at the North-West area of Pt. St. Lucie. Consider thè businesses that are being constructed at St. Lucie West. ". '-" ."WI The number of jobs, not only in the building industry, but the ancillary jobs that construction creates will be enormous and the industry will be clean. Look at the area near the Arvida Community, just to our north; would you like to see that as you come into St. Lucie County or would you like to see the Riveria Beach U.S. # 1 corridor where the power plants are? '- Call yourselves out of mediocrity for St. Lucie County.. .Dare to take the steps to deny the zoning change at this particular location and urge EnRon Corporation to check out other areas in St. Lucie County that are more suitable for a power plant-some just west and south of this parcel our development could show them areas that are already zoned for this project. Help us grown upwards---not sideways. I am not against "peak power plants', in fact I came and spoke in favor of the Duke Power Plant as it was in a properly zone location and they were willing to give and take on areas. . I respectfully and strongly request that you deny this proposed zoning request and that you urge the EnRon Corporation to seek other lands that are zoned for this purpose. There are many Real Estate people who are stating that they have never been approached for suitably zoned land. Lets work together to respect the land, the precious water; each other and the future of St. Lucie County. The White City area is now over 100 year old and is growing in a positive fashion, lets help it go in a forward direction, not in a stagnant or backward '-' Thank you for time and your attention to this very important issue. Sincerely yours Arlene Goodman ,. . -' £00 'd '-' 'WI Florida Power & Light Company Corporate Communications Media Line: 305-552-3888 April 3,2001 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE . FPL expects sufficient generation to m.lllt summer demand; files annual10-year update with Florida Public Service Commission JUNO BEACH, Fla. - Florida Power & Light Company today projected a 20 percent ganeratlng reeeNe margin for thi& SUmmer, thereby 2Iuurll'lg ils customers that there would be a sufficient supply of electricity this summer. The projections were part of an annual report that FPL flied with the Florida Public ServIce Commission, which outlines new FPL power plants entering service this year, In construction and nearing completion, or planned for the future. The plan also Includes purchases of power and demand-side management and conservation programs. "Unlike Califomia. Florida custOmers enjoy an adequate supply of electricity," said FPL President Paul Evanson. "Our expansion program reflects our commitment to maintain sufficient reserves, while remaJnlng one of the cleanest utilIties in the country." Each year FPL's update to the commission looks at the present and 10 years Into the future_ Adjustments are made from year to year based on customer use, growth and other forecast factors. The ten-year period 2001-2010 calls for an increase in capacity resources of 33 percent, all using environmentally friendly natural-gas technology. During that same period FPL expects to add about 700,000 customers. The primary planning change from last year Is a forecasted need for six rather than three future FPL power plants as a result of increased customer growth and usage, and the expiration of certain power purchase contracts by the end of the decade. Plan summary This Year - FPL reported that 1,200 megawatts of FPL generatIon is newly In service or will be in time for this summer. (That's enough electricity to serve approximately 280,000 homes and businesses.) The company says Its new - more - ~~ '.~. . ,s:,¡ (30J.)¡0,£0-·([d\, attachment II 9 '- '-' page2JFPL, resources should provide a sufficient supply of electrIcity for the summer barring unexpected losses of major generating units. 2002·2003 - By the end of 2003. another 1,450 megawatts of new generating capacity, currently under constrUction, will enter service. This represents power coming from the completed "repowerlng" of FPL's Fort Myers and Sanford power plants, as well as new generating units belng-added tç the Fort Myers plant site. Repowerlng converts older, oil·fired plants to new, cleaner bUrnIng nature I gas- fired power plant technology. Following repowering, the Fort Myers plant wlJl nearly triple Its output to 1,400 megawatts, and the Sanford plant site will more than double Its capacity to 2,100 megawatts. 2005·2006 - By the middle of this decade FPL expects to convert peaking Units at Fort Myers and the Martin County plsntto natural gas-fired, combined-cyc/e generators. FPL also plans to add two more generating units at the Martin plant sIte and another on FPL property at a site called Midway In St. Lucie County. 2007·2010 - FPL's current planning studies have identified five new combined cycle units as the preferred options to meet future growth at the end of the decade. However. repoweñng of eXisting FPL sItes or new power purchases remain as alternatives. FPL will continue to examine these options. Looking ahead and continuing to work with our Communities "Certainly if the energy needs of our customers increase beyond current projections, we will accelerate our power plant expansion timetable: said Mr. Evanson. "We also recognize that our expansion plans have an impact on the communities we serve - adding not only pOWer plants. but also Power lines and wires needed to move electricity from the generation sources to our population centerS,. Mr. Evanson sald. ·We will continue to work with municipalities, counties, agencIes and citizens to look for ways to enhance the benefits and operating and envIronmental performance of our facilities." ensuring that We save energy, not just add power plants "At the same time we are adding new generation to meet a gro,Wing population, we,wlII continue to promote energy conservation programs to help reduce demand for electrIcity: Mr. Evanson added. -0 more .. .,' ...... ÞOO .¿ £ç: ¡:l (311.1.) 10 .£0- ·~¿V '- ....¡ page3lFPL., "Over the past two deoades, through conservation programs, we've helped our customers reduce energy Use enough to avoid having to build sevsn power plants. And we anticipate avoiding the need for two medium-sized power plants in this decade,' Mr. Evanson said. "FPL continues to support cost-effective conservation as a major part of our effort to provide customers low-cost, reliable and environmentally responsIble electricity." FPL - This Year and Beyond FPl Preparation: · 2001 summer system capability - 20,099 megawatts (summer) · 2001 reserve margIn forecast - 20 percent · 2000 summer peak -17,606 megawatts · 2001 forecasted summer peak - 16,000 megawatts, plus · 2001 voluntary load reduction capability _ 1,300 megawatts · 2001 customers partlclpating In voluntary load reducing programs _ 685,000 FÞL., Future PJllns: · Major scheduled plal1t additions (summer): · Fort Myers repowered - 900 megawatts of new capacity (from 540 to 1,440 megawatts); complete In mid-2002 · Sanford repowered - 1,150 megawatts of new capacIty (from 950 mw to 2,100 megawatts In 2003 · Martin - two new natural gas, combined cycle units of 550 megawatts each in :W05 · Fort Myers - new natural gas, combined cycle unit of 550 megawatts in 2005 · Midway - new natural gas, combined cycle unit of 550 mêgawatts in 2005 . Martin - new natural gas, combined cycle unit of 550 megawatts In 2006 . The equivalent of fIVe new, unsited combined-cycle generating units _ onè In 2007, one in 2009 and three In 2010. . FPL., total capacity additions planned for 2001- 2010, including new generating units and purchases from other companies: 6,300 megawatts . Enargy conservation: 765 mw of additional reduction In energy demand achieved from 2000 to 2009. Florida Power & Light Company is the principal subsidiary of FPL Group, Inc. (NYSE:FPL), one of the nation's largest providers of electricity-related services with annual revenues of more than $7 billion. The company serves - more -. . .,' .... ~ £00 'd vHI (gO.L) 10 ,£0- '~dV "-' 'wi page 4/FPL approximately 3_9 million customer accounts in Florida. FPL Energy, LLC, an FPL Group energy-generating subsidiary, is a leader In producing electricity from clean and renewable fuels. Additional Information Is available on the Internet at www.fpl.eom. ### Note to Editors: Following are 60me definitions of utility terminology that may be helpful: Slmple.eye/. units - Simple-cycle units are combustion turbines Qet engines) . that make power "directly" by using combustion to drIve a turbine/generator that produces electricity. Sometime they also are called "peaking unlts_" This type of generator can be brought into service qulcldy for short periods of time, so simple- cycle peaking units are often used to meet periods of high customer use In the summer or winter. . Combined-çyc/e unIts - This type of generating technology uses both simple- eycle combustion turbines Qet engines), plus a steam-driven turbine/generator. CombIned cycle units are effiolent and cost effective because they make electricity using both the combustIon process, and then the waste heat from theIr Jet engines to make more electricity. The waste heat Is directed to a steam generator. The steam that's produced then runs a secondary, electrIcity producIng turbine/generator. Using steam to make electricity has been the traditiona/technology in use for many years. ### ,. , , _. ." ., - --"- 900 'd 9S: ,1 (3n.L) 10 ,£0- '( di' - ~~IO"""""'._"~.~,,,,_.! i¡:"~'''''''''~I~'',".,J'::~l:t'¡.......'\'J\i'!!r. .:'~:~~1:~~·~:,~.~~ ..~ ;:~~:~: ~~ ').~.:"::: '':. '. ....,; " '. " .~ ')~.. ft' .~,\,'1.. . '.' '::':7;~:.I!Í '~~ . ~~ ..,~ ~"~\'/..,. r:.. , .', '·""\"1-" ~""~-J . ø '1"8 I~r''':..: . ""fl~: ';::'_"~ /...... ....,.., "'r"""''''"''~ .·:>i!iLt:~~{~~;t "f', '01:' 'I .' '. . .. . .' '}~~"~}" :,~::I:,.,,~: ~ '.!i,'.',~ . .' ~;!~L;~' '. ,:~r"';~::, . ~~n;·: . , ;:'1<:, .:':'¡:; ,''':,'' . :.:~.~~ '.;'¡;¡" \ ,(;~., .'. ¡.."{, ..." .~:'-" .,. ·........,':~......·,..._.·:U. .:i""....."".ø.,.... .~....J,; I .. . .. .' . .... ·,:·f¡:;'::.~,:,:: I" :'~~~~' \" 'I"'..:. , 1 :'''':. .,;.;'~ ..1'·~~~~~:!:J." ,::~'; , .' ",', ,"n . ..." '¡:}'t'~. .~: . . 'Ii.. ·;,~}:~J.;~{};t1!,~r;;.::};.:;:·:· . ....~1m...1i.¡.¡I"".''I.:"...,..........,....'., . . :;.:.·,:t~~~t~~¡:l~~~:,~*~~;,';~t,:¡:c' , ·:~.fl:p'=-'~~_·~ '1?,'fJ";~ \"::;,:t ~..~\ ;;"~;"!' '~:';" . "':.",'i..~~.~,:,,,....~~, ,:,,~ !'\"',"Jo'¡..a~'!".'''' ~ .,:t.M d'J~'.'I:>' "'-"'~ '1'..) to.... ~"''''..\ ~ . .."..~., . ~..'.' I,::&~.:r; >1' ..... .~ ~ .i];~{~~;~',i~";·.~5::'{ ~f: i'....:· . ~·.'!,~~'r~\:r,,-::1':·r.:"!' . ....., :> '. ' '~~~ I' . ..:::.,'.:".'''' .r.:.:'.,!.::,¡..\;: . M . . ,'...... . . t ~., .. ., .., ..\..~I-,f:... . .:, ........',. - ..::.....,:¡.......;.:..:.....;.:.: .....:.'..:~..~.~;:\;:.:.r ':..~:,l7-~ "t:..~.~....:.,_... .....""',.....M....::S..~....~'I:.w~..~~~ -L.,~.:;:.'fr~fij1~iJh~ ':' ;":'.: ",'." ....ç,:-..~;;'-::;;.:~.::.-, ;)'" : .:~;¡';:'..':..;:,.: r"?~"···,.."j~";~ìíi::i:.':'¡~ , ::". .. -.. :" 'I'ì" '. .,'. l " ,I" '" " . , ~. . . . .. . '" "~" M, ...,.-......,~,~.:.~.!"'..,,,.....:.... J:.: ".,r,..;;>~~ . .~. ".!I,~,~" .111". . . .",~~;~~;,~ :" '. f"':1:. v..~ '. ': ',,~ ::. " , ." ',' ...'_...~.' ".".",.'. ".',"""'., . 'I!"./.!.....~ I .., ,,' I., L·;¡"'}:.::~¡k~.,~!':.::.~:., _ .:~:.::..:l'. ..' :. : ..;'::.;,}:~.:,'..",::.: .;: <:i,,,.:~+:~:~·E~j2i~! '-:--"'I.:..~..":",,.......~..~ ·."':",'i:....~·.-"'.~~I""'''''''''I~I~~'IItII'. ....:~~II'.....i:r.........IIII........"'...I~K.....~~~þt'P;l!l" " ...., ;,: "::',':,:', > ,,".:' :::.::~.::.,<;::.}:.';\,:.~:;;¡i .. '. ". .': . .' " " .' . ....., ,:. <í...,.. ",r, ,. ..1.,........1/,..... .~.r..\~.~ . ~... . .,'. "....... .j,....... "1'_"1' ...:\:....., _'1\" "'1. .1,. ·~..._...._.lt.I.......:.:;" ./.'... '"... '., "".~ 'r.;.~ ..: ï·,. ::.: . ..:,':, :¡'-:!,\~~~:"':'-:¡';::'M" "H:,: ~t!:~ :-::':::."" ':J .... .: :;. ·.·..":\~·;I:::'~:--.:.:.~r.:.;.:, ".,:..:'¡~:." ....;.:. ':~ '~¡~!'lC~"H: '.': :). . ~"..:'. .' ::: /,':'1::::~~,'if1n!{~~t~~Q~~~' !:1~ : ., , . ,'·1 -:-·_:'~~'+:-:c...J:~!-'!:~~~~_.I_.~'t..~ci.&...!!.'I!'''IJt.,¡'i~i..''.!J,tJi'Aðr.rny~;; )¡Qi.l.;¡,~:::~~ ~""..."' I_'¡II_~a, . .---'~_......--............_....,' ... d....~....~!:::,:(,~~..i7":t\:!.~_,.~!: :'I< ,:-<ln~.":7. ~ . :: j \: 1~r.~1, I. . ~, '1" ,~ t . r,", :'.'. ':': ........ ...., MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: March 27, 2001 Tape: 1 Convened: 10:01 a.m. Adjourned: 10:01 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman John D. Bruhn, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Paula A. Lewis, Cliff Barnes Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Julia Schewchuk, Community Development Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Deputy Nickel. A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-2279) It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the minutes of March 13, 2001; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. CONSENT AGENDA (1-2289) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. The Board approved Warrant List No. 24 and 25. 2. Mosquito Control- Amendment No.1 Contract No. C99-03-331 with Florida Rock Industries, Inc.,- The District approved the amendment to provide the District with Coquina Rock at $3.50 per ton, and authorized the Chairman to execute the amendment. There being no further business to be brought before the District, the meeting was adjoumed. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court '-" .,¡ PRAYER OFFERED I April 10, 2001 BOCC MEETING FOR EASTER................ Jesus said: "I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and, whoever lives and believes in me, will never die". Father in Your Name We Pray, Amen '-' ...., , APRIL 10, 2001 9:00 AM GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public co=ent. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORillvl- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 AM., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 Or TOO (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-" 'wi www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Qiff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 DistrictS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA April 10, 2001 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held April 3, 2001. 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATION A. Rudy Howard will introduce Wally Eccleston, Executive Director of the St. Lucie County Economic Development Council. B. The Chairman will present a Letter of Appreciation to Ms. Ginger King for the donation by Lawnwood Regional and St. Lucie Medical Centers for the South County Regional Stadium. Budget Resolution No. 01-86 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the sponsorship agreement, accept the $1,000 Corporate Sponsorship payment, and approve the budget resolution to appropriate and expend the funds. C. Presentation - Mr. H. B. Holmes, Jr. of Higher Dimensions Community Development Corp. will discuss the Everglades Restoration Project. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure thðt a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any indMd't...1 testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disabUity requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the Sl Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462·1 m or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least lorty-eight(48) hoUls poor to the meeting. '-' -....I REGULAR AGENDA APRIL 10, 2001 PAGE TWO PUBliC HEARIN'GS 5A. There are no public hearings scheduled for April 10, 2001 End of Public Hearings 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Ordinance No. 01-06 - Property Maintenance Regulations I Permission to Advertise - Consider staffrecommendation to grant permission to advertise the ordinance, and that the Board request that the Local Planning Agency review the draft ordinance before the Board schedules its public hearing. v;J B Resolution No. 01-87 - Consider staff recommendation that the Board consider Resolution No. 01-87, titled A Resolution Requesting the State of Florida Enforce the Usury Law and other Consumer Protections against Payday Lenders. 7. ADMINISTRATION A. Art in Public Places Art and Design Committee - Consider staff recommendation that each Commissioner select one applicant for the Art in Public Places Art and Design Committee. B. Bi-weekly Committee Reports - The Board will give updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on. V N'", I~ /' I f(J . ' VI 'V ¡J/lP" t ",,,, fl' {f"(' 1 ¡I '-' ...,; CONSENT AGENDA Amil10. 2001 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 27. 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. B. AJu Road and Bridge / lnterlocal Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the interlo~al agreement as drafted by the County Attorney, between the City of Port St. Lucie and St. Lucie County for the use of portions of Tract H-15 for drainage purposes for Midway Road and Glades Cut-off intersection improvements, and authorize the Chairman to sign the Interlocal Agreement. Road and Bridge / Equipment Request No. 01-155 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment request to purchase a used Caterpillar 950F Wheel Loader, in accordance with the St. Lucie County Purchasing Manual, from Equipment Senter, Inc. for $97,000. c. Engineering / Change Order No. 1 / Repair of Existing Control Wall at Midway Road and NSLRWCD Canal 90 - Consider staff recommendation to approve, and authorize the Chairman to sign, the change order in the amount of (-$3,000), accept the project, release retainage in the amount of $4,545 and make final payment in the amount of $5,995 to Johnson-Davis, Inc., resulting in a total contract of $46,900. Code Compliance / Equipment Request No. 01-246 / Budget Amendment No. 01-136 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment request and budget amendment to purchase a sound level meter from Dawson Associates, Inc., in the amount of $2,760. 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Contract Amendment - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Third Amendment to the April 21, 1998 Agreement between St. Lucie County and Dawn G. Kirk, P.A., for legal representation of indigents for dependency cases, and authorize the Chairman to sign same upon obtaining all necessary signatures. B. St. Lucie County Landfill / Utility Easement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the 10' Utility Easement in favor of Florida Power and Light Company, authorize the Chairman to execute the easement and instruct staff to record the easement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. 4. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 01-028 / Hazardous Waste Disposal for Solid Waste Division - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Care Environmental, in the amount of $8,665 (total w/set up cost). '- ...., CONSENT AGENDA APRIL 10, 2001 PAGE TWO 4. PURCHASING (CONTINUED) B. Bid No. 01-041 / Moving Services for St. Lucie County - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the two bidders, Arnoff Moving and Hendershot Moving. Costs will be determined as needs are determined. 5. UTILITIES A. Equipment Request No. 01-245 /Budget Amendment No. 01-135 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment request and budget amendment for the purchase of a lift station pump from a sole source vendor, Flygt, in the amount of $3,275. B. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise for sealed bids for the North Hutchinson Island P.V. Martins Water, Reuse and Force Main Extension at an approximate project cost of $279,290. 6. AIRPORT A. Airfield Signage Rehabilitation Project - Consider staff recommendation to award the base construction bid and alternate bid to The Signal Group Inc., in the amount of $539,174.76 for the base bid and $110,280 for the alternate bid for a total project cost of $649,454.76. B. Taxiway A-3 Improvement Project - Consider staff recommendation to award the base construction bid to Dickerson Florida in the amount of $401,195.13. 7. COMMUNITY SERVICES Certificate of Participation for the Drug Control and System Improvement Program (Edward Byrne) Grant for 2001/02 from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign the Certificate of Participation for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement Program. 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Oleander Business Park Water Main Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve Budget Resolution No. 01-89 to appropriate and expend the funds from Fort Pierce Utilities Authority for the construction of new utilities in the Oleander Business Park in the amount of $11,888; accept the project, approve the release of retainage in the amount of $41,816.06 and approve final payment to Sheltra & Sons in the amount of $93,139.72. '-' 'WI CONSENT AGENDA APRIL 10, 2001 PAGE THREE 9. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Bid 01-015 I Replace Intercom System at Rock Road Jail - Consider staff recommendation to reject all bids and re-bid using alternative systems that are within the budget. ~}B 10. Transfer of Funds - Consider staff recommendation to approve the transfer of $13,550 from the Maintenance Projects - Ag. Center account to the Smithsonian Building account to install light poles. ADMINISTRATION Art in Public Places Art & Design Committee Appointment - Consider staff recommendation to ratify Commissioner Hutchinson's appointment of Robbin C. Lynch to the Art in Public Places Art & Design Committee. 11. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Consultant Agreement for Communications Network - Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Presidio Corporation to define the scope of work necessary for vendors to respond to the Communications RFP. , \...-- """ AGENDA REQUEST '-'fTEM NO. 2/h DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Parks & Recreation Director SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Approval of the sponsorship agreement between Lawnwood RegionalISt. Lucie Medical Centers and St. Lucie County and acceptance of the $1000.00 payment per their Sponsorship Agreement. BACKGROUND: As part of the ongoing effort to obtain funding for the South County Regional Stadium, corporate sponsorship packages have been offered. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be available in Account # 301-'1910_599330-79502 South County Regional Stadium Reserve Account PREVIOUS ACTION: NIA RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the sponsorship agreement with Lawnwood Regional and St. Lucie Medical Centers; accept their $1000.00 Corporate Sponsorship payment, approve Budget Resolution No. 01-86 and that the Chairman sign the letter of appreciation. COMMISSION ACTION: [¡J APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CE: County Attorney: JJ/ ~ , Coordination/Sianatures Mgt. & BUdge~ 1n/Ylf5¡ other: Purchasing Mgr.: Originating Dept: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eff.1/97 H:\WP\agenda sponsorship Lawnwood Medical.wpd "-" ..., RESOLUTION NO. 01-86 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for SI. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available from Lawnwood Regional and SI. Lucie Medical Centers Corporate sponsorship agreements for the South County Regional Stadium. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of SI. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 10th day of April, 2001, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2000-01, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 301-7516-369913-79502 Advertising $1,000 APPROPRIATIONS 301-9910-599330-79502 Reserves $1,000 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Pauia A. Lewis Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Doug Coward xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2001. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY ¥ ..", SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT THIS SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of , 2001, by and between Lawnwood Regional and St. Lucie Medical Centers, 1800 S.E. Tiffany Avenue, Port St. Lucie, Florida, hereinafter referred to as ·Sponsor", and St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, hereinafter referred to as "County". WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, the County is proposing to construct a South County Regional Stadium ("Stadium") located adjacent to the St. Lucie County Sports Complex and is soliciting donations for private parties to help fund construction of the Stadium: and, WHEREAS, Sponsor desires by this Agreement to pledge to County the amount set out in the Agreement for use by the County in funding the stadium: and, WHEREAS, County desires to accept the pledge by Sponsor pursuant to this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00) dollars and other good and valuable consideration paid by County to Sponsor, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and each of the covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, each of which shall be deemed consideration for the other, it is agreed by and between County and Sponsor as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. 2. Simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement, Sponsor agrees to pay to the County the principöl sum of One thousand and 0/100 Dollars ($1,000.00), payable on or before April 1, 2001, which indebtedness is evidenced by the Promissory Note of Sponsor (the "Note") in such sum, copy of said Note being attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit" A". 3. COVENANTS OF SPONSOR. Sponsor does hereby warrant and represent that Sponsor has the authority to execute this Agreement. 4. COVENANTS OF COUNTY. In return for Sponsor's commitment, County agrees to provide the Sponsor for one (1) year: g: \atty\agreemnt\Lawnwood Regional-sponsorsnlp Page I of 3 ¥ ""'" Two Announcements on PA System During Games 4x8 Sign Advertising at all Events Sponsorship at a Selected Event Web Page Promotion 2 Seasonal Tickets to Events at the Stadium Hole Sponsorship Sign at a Leisure Services Golf Tournament 5. REMEDIES. The County may either at law or in equity, by suit, action, mandamus, or other proceedings, in any court of competent jurisdiction, protect and enforce any and all rights existing under the laws of the State of Florida, or granted and contained in this Agreement and the Note, and may enforce and compel the payment of all sums and the performance of all duties required by this instrument or by any applicable laws to be performed by the Sponsor or by any officer thereof. 6. MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT. No material modification or amendment of this Agreement or of the Note may be made without the consent in writing of the County, provided, however, that no modification or amendment shall permit a change in the maturity of the Note, a reduction in the rate of interest thereon, or a reduction in the amount of the principal obligation thereof; nor shall any modification or amendment either affect the unconditional promise of the Sponsor to pay the principal of an interest on the Note, as the same shall become due. 7. SEVERABILITY OF INVALID PROVISIONS. If any provIsion of this Agreement should be held to be contrary to any express provision of law or to be contrary to the policy of express law, though not expressly prohibited, or to be against public policy, or should for any reason whatsoever be held invalid, then such provision shall be null and void and shall be deemed separate from the remaining provisions of, and in no way affect the validity of, all the other provisions of, and in no way affect the validity of, all the other provisions of this Agreement or of the Note issued hereunder. 8. DELIVERY OF NOTE. The proper officers of the Sponsor have been duly authorized to execute this Agreement and the Note and to sign on behalf of the Sponsor any and all documents necessary or desirable in connection with the delivery of this Agreement and of the Note. 9. SITUS. The Note and this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue of any litigation shall be in St. Lucie County. 9: \atty\agreemnt \Lawnwood Regional-sponsorsh ip Page 2 of 3 "-' ..,.; 10. BINDING COVENANTS. All representations, covenants and warranties in this Agreement or in the Note shall be binding upcn Spcnsor ,:¡nd i~'s SLc"e~sors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the County, its succcs::ors, cndJrsees, 7ransferees or assigns. 11. NOTICE. All notices, requests, demands or other communications provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given upon posting in a United States Post Office, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the party to whom such communication is to be given at its address as set forth at the head of this instrument, or to such other address as either party shall designate in writing in like manner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers and their respective seals hereunto affixed the day and year first above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney WITNESSES: SPONSOR LAWNWOOD REGIONAL AND ST. LUCIE MEDICAL NTERS /[ <:::v-~ BY: C~ ¿1, G - ( ¿j~ ~U \ \ ~ ,LV'j~ \ ....... '\. .. fl'/h1fé~ ~II ~ld;"'/~ /' - , 9: \atty\agreemnt\l.awnwood Regional-sponsorship Page 3 af 3 ¥ ...., NOTE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: One Thousand Dollars DATE: April 1, 2001 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the Lawnwood Regional and St. Lucie Medical Centers, for value received, promises to pay to St. Lucie County, or registered assigns, One thousand ($1,000.00) dollars on or before April 1, 2001, payable by check or draft mailed to the Office of the St. Lucie County Finance Director, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. The principal of this Note is payable in lawful money of the United States of America. WITNESSES: ~ c\j l,l 'v C\. t il'l ' \-- _ ¡'C;·/,/i!Ù L),'_{,;;¿4~k¿'~ LAWNWOOD REGIONAL AND ST. LUCIE MEDICAL ENTERS BY: c, ~ Exhibit "A" G: IA TTYIAGREEMNT\Lawnwood Regiol1QI-NOTE ........ ....., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS April 10, 2001 Ginger King, Director of Marketing St. Lucie Medical Centers 1800 S.E. Tiffany Avenue Pt. St. Lucie, FL 34952 Dear Ms. King: On behalf of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners and the Parks & Recreation Department, I would like to extend our warmest appreciation for the generous donation in sponsorship of the South County Regional Stadium. Lawnwood Regional and St. Lucie Medical Centers' involvement exemplifies the commitment needed for the completion of the stadium and your organization's dedication to the citizens of St. Lucie County. Sincerely, Frannie Hutchinson, Chairman Board of County Commissioners MAR-30-2001 0~:40 PM PAULETTE ROBERTS 15617e5~314 P..01 , '-' "" HIGHER DIMENSIONS COMMUNITY DEVE.LOPMENT COR.P. ì',(\ ,;><.. '---' March 28, 2001 Chairwoman Fran Hutchinson (~wðÞ ~IIO ciCC .~~ St. Lucie COI.n'I ty Commi..sion Virginia Ave Ft. Pierce F1 :W950 Dear Fran Hutchinson: Hishcr Dimensions wt')u!d like to 'first thank you for taking time out or your billy schedule to meet with '" at our "Ineubamr" Ineaterl in the Orange Blossom Man. Higher Dùnenøf_ (HDCDC) is proud to be apart of the future devclopment of job growth md vocational education in St. Luciè County. We hope that the information provided to the county at an ecnnnmic level encomp"s'Ù1g plans of comprehensive strategy. W11I be t2ken into eonsidt.'I'I1tion as 11 part öf the final draft. St. L,de C<J\mty has a monumental opportunity to participate in a 20-year South Flonda region project knoWf1 as "Everglade.. Restoration", an. estim..1ted cost of 7.8 billion dolbt-s., desip,ned to t'Cstore, pre.erve and protect our ecosystem. HDCDC is taking a proactive apprnach to in.ure that local sma11 ""d minority own businesses in St. Lucie County have the :lV'aihbilit)' of information and ec!uation to participate. At this time, High"" Dimensions woUld like to request an opportunity to bring before the County C'.ommi.,ion a proposal at thc;r next meeting. This proposiIJ would address the needs and possible bencfits to ha";ng a comrmmity-ba.ed out1'each program that would wc')tk along-sidc the county', ecc)f1om;c devdopment department to insure equal access and business d~"pmCtlt 1 would like to thank you in advatlce for your positive response to this I'C< \lcst. Should there be any questions and or date .meduling. please feel fi:ee to eon tact me at 56 t-398- 4007 or hh¡'nlmP,i<@ñnfmllÙ.com. T look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, ~~fl H.B. Holmes Jr. President and CEO . óÝÌ 1~ nr i Lf0 ~. \WlrcP I yJAVy,u'1i¿) r 0 . 0 I v "Jj ¡)ul (/ I{'L cy , 1 Dr "'0 V . ,IP Q ¡)ìuLvY I €,li 8 ø" o li &~ ~ 0 8..8 ¡:; ~ [ '" Õ' ..., ~ § 8 ~ o Q. C ¡::-. "' 0 g.it1i"' CZI <:: .-,. 00",'0 -(¡Q - g,]~§ (ti (f¡ P ..., P ~ 0.. ~ 0 ~ 0" < r=; 0 ~ ~ n -. 0 "..0"''0 ¡:; C ~ 8 g. '" " ~. "' ......::tJ_ ....... o 0 .~.. Q.", "' 0"'0 ~ g @ S' 0 -< (1) p (D' ~ ~ ~ 0" C '" ~. "' " '" '" " Y' 8 <" ..., § ~ 0.", ~ " 0-8 ..... ::1- ::T", ~ ,,(D @ ~ ~~ a fZ 0 ,.., ~ ~ g < 0 () "< ~ ~ = (D () èÐ (11 cr= 0'" 0 '" ::T 0 8 "'1~0 o ., :¡:; SQ:~~ n '" "' 0,< '" . ~"' >-3 . Q. ::T '" ~. S' (Ï) ~ ~ 5' S'. '0 li n 8 " '" c": ~ (b g[s=~: tn ~ 0 æ. (f¡ ¡...o, =........ ~ ~:¡:;~g.o CI1 _. ~ ........;:1 (I: :::::"< ("þ (.f) '" "' Q. '" C '0 '0 o '" :4'0 . '" n .0 . . .... ... > "''''VI >OVl z<ëii z 6 > ?m~ !" 'V> '" VI ~ :s - n ~ :¡; .... õ ... z -c . VI Z m VI VI m Z .... '" m ... '" m Z m c: '" :¡; ,... .... m n :r z ñ > ,... sÇ/) g~ ()= o ~ g:¡", ~ 2 '" l'J ~~ a > 0"'" c:: '" ~.E;j ~ ~ '" z '" (") ~ l'J '" 0"" c:: '" '" '" S' 8 o 0 '" "' '" .~ rJ~ :¿'C (S' Q " ;:: '0 "' a 6-: :::. ~ 0. ~ ~ ~ ..., li ~ ê.= . . 00 '" ... Q m > '" z > - .... N m m > ... 3: :¡¡ z z om '" ~ ::¡ -< z n c: ... ... c: > VI .... Z 0 m '" VI VI -1"0 <"0 I» ;::0 I» 0 I ~~<:( )~VI:¡OO æ ,5\., ,¡¡¡ 0.::>" 0.30. VI ~ 0 ëi:: -'3·'· e:1»~:¡I»Vlðe:O ~ 3 ( ) VI C"!1!. 0 :¡ 0 t!)VI 0 0 ëDg.:a~_. Ollie:..... VlO VI Q):JàO:T--i»C'" !!!.o.~<OVl_!!!1lI . ~<:e:-( )" en= OClCt> ( ) '< 1»!1!. _. 0. :¡ <0:¡:¡'Q:¡00 -. ........ Q.<e 0 ..... """ :J o ;;to < ::T<o "C ( ) w 3 -.( ) III ~ cn::!,o0o. :¡O ..... <È a. "C (1) (f) -. 3: ::r ( ) "0 ( ) ¡¡; ¡;j "",,_..,°0__ o ::r III ;:¡. 0 ( ) _. (]I J5( )roe::¡ogo :J'"- ::!.O -_~ o 2..S·::!'·3 'TIO e: -0 ( ) -'-e: 'Ô' _Oocnoo~~ ::E 3 Ill::!' 0. r-+ -. a._ ::::r::Jm-::Jn:J<Dw CD <.c. 0 a.. 0._ . '" "' Q." " "'0 o '" "' "' ~ '" @ -. n 0 ~ ::> . . ,...'" m m Z '" t7 < ~ ñ ~ œ o ::E z > Z t7 ,... 0 o ... > ; z > VI .... m > ." ... o c: '" VI Z o ::: .... !" :J: m '" S':I:> (') -.'"t:;I c(¡Q'C cr'g:=: '" ..., n ~ '" o ~ ..., ~. o "' '" ~.'C ::> ..., n 0 c:: < 0" ~. ~ e: ~ "' g(¡Q i'? t:J §' ~ ::r g ('þ t (f¡ ~. þ) 'J 0 < N.-..PO) ~ "'... ~ '" P5'" Q;;õ g ,.,. " ~""t!:1"" ~ -....; c: 0 ~ ~ i!?'" " ;:! ::> ~OQ ~ 9- ('t) ~ VI ('þ :I:O()i:"'i()tJ:I: 8~~ n ~·t o 0 ~ "0 ¡:: ~. tñ·~ g. S .~. § ::s ('1) '< en >-t _::S ('1) ...... ~ >-t Çl.('1) (t> Õ'::t >-t ('1) a"Çl. = en er g ('1) en en . = ~ '" - ~ '" '" ..... Z (") ~ 1:<1 > .., o '" n 0 ~'ê _. ¡...o. -'0 ~8 " 8 "' '" r-'< ~ þ" ('1) ~ en ~~8 8,::>:::: fno..~ o 0 ........, ~ ê. ::To 0"" ::> S' (1 Þ¡j < c:: !:?. :e g ~ 8 ~. õP..t:;C::r' S1 Õ' ¡,g t!:1 ..., n c:: Q ~ g S' E; In CÐ :¡:; " ..... ¡:; o ::T::J ..., ~ f> t"" ET." >-3 0 ~ 0 ::r þ:I {JQ ~CÐ::S e: ~ gä '" o §: .~ .", - o ·z '", > n .., - <: - .., - l'J ~ iZI "'t:S ~ r.n þ:I ::r a _. ~ ~ ß.< 8-< 0-' :::.('þ ('þ :¡:; it - :; S' 2- ~ ~ [ '" ~. "' " '" '" "'1~ C ¡;¡ "' ::> P-" o §.. ..."" " >-3~ ::T'" t:I g '" 8 ::;3 ?r (=;' ('t) Co a ~ t!:1 = c::: Õ ~ Š' § (':),,'" ==' en ...... = '" ::T ~ t"" a o c _. ~ (JQ ::> :s :r § "' ~ o ..., S' (¡Q :r 8-'" " i'i '" S" 2 b O"n ¡:;g. o ..., 0" '" ¡;¡ ~ 5' Q." ~ '" ::T'" o " ~ _. '" '0 ::0;, tö ~~5.~~C-' ~ [ ~:- õ' ê. ~~ ê {r. ~ Co (ì (tI a ã.. ~ '" li ;:¡ ê F~g~~ @ :P --ì .., r.n ~ .g g (11 ;::: 0'" (ì "t:I..c.{g ""0 c::: ::¡ þ:I c::: ~ ~. f!?, (D'::¡ e:. (') ~ ::s en ::s -, ('þ ("tI ('þ ('þ:::"1 "" '--' CI'.J þ:I 1-1 (t¡ _ IJJ ~ ~ Co:::J 0. _. 0.. '0 :I::r0" t:J~B; () :e S' t:J" " n g ~ o '" ~:¡:; "' !:?. ~ Q.-..., . '" ..0 t!:1 ()..o I-'t c _ fþ c " E. ~ "' !:?. ~~en;-:::': 0'-<,' 0 1-1 ¡....:¡ ::> 8 8.. '" Õ' g.., s:: õ~ ~~e.g~ ~ (t¡ ~ ('þ (;' ~. ~ > p..~. " 3.:g >-3 § ~('):=:::r&!" ~ ~ g rø ::> ~ Ë~ :I:S: t:J- ()n t:J'" ()o t"" o 0 g:¡> " z ë;! '" 0" " n ::r ;J " 0. Zo .., " c:: þ.:e ..., o ~ Q.O~ o ¡;¡ 8 ~ ~ .., ~ ('þ 8 en Co ::!. "'C'J ~ ::rrøena ;; ;¡ :>;" < r:; õa õ: § '" '0 C ~ '" 5.~;'tT1~ 1-1 G þ:I g ÞOOJ o þ:I CT'C1Q c::: ~ e:",~-8n ::s 0::;' c::r' þ:I "'C'J ~ ......-8 8 1-1" O,c_ ::tI°Z~'"1 ë;!ê'0:-J5'''S¡ ,....,. (') ~ ¡;;;õ. ==' (') P. rn '1::1 -::s !JQ o 0 ........ þ:I -. ÞOOJ 8 p g a.Jg =8 ~ "" ~.. ~..1-1 -5' ~ ~g-3~:8- ~8-<~7~ . ~ ~ Ç/) .,. <: <: ><: .~ ~ ~ ..J '.."I'/.;t -;'TJt""::\,n::;::¡:¡¡:o,¡::,.'g'TJ .".:j¡"1_-.!~""" ." ~, ,~~ \.' )·......:·1· t:: t: ('þ 0 ..... '"d (tI 00 0 .,,~·.~I '" . ,,' _J.: .·.i~..~""'·.~·í~ ==' D. Cf t:: Q -- '"'1 <:: 0 (JQ ""1 '~~"'. Jr- - ~'....:? ~'.( '5 0. CD ~ g ~ t'Þ g. :'I .., U····· .1. .I·l·'· ~ '< õ' '" ~ 0 '"3::;> ".'ID~'"'' ~ 0 nv> .... c:: "0 ~ , ~"" ,,~'~ ?¡O,.:/ 1-1 1-01') 0;" n '"d 0 8 0:: 1;1) ::\. : eü ~i f , . ~-~~¡~t ~ ¡:;. g ¡; ~: ~ g ~ g ~ 8. [ :' ,_.... .'1 ~ I. \\ ~'", ÞTI (þ '< D.::::;:' (0 ~ ~ ,. I 0 . .'. ,'" ~ t"" CD ::r' < '" . ¡Ii ~. . ì; ¡ '.j ,", ':', ':~iJ" 0<>' '1; 5' n !!.. 'g g: n ';¿ g, . ¡' ¡J'¡ . . . ,', . 5" ~.... 0 O.g 0 c:: 0 O~' Q ): ~ '~!~,... .¡,.'". .... 3 æ C::.J! 3 ~. g..a ~3' g 3 , I", " \ t:''':'¿ t:I -..... p. 0 IZI þ) , .,: it' (.' ~.' Q ~ g g. õ' ¡;J g ~ ::!. "'" " 1~'.\ " ~ 8 t:tI"'" CIJ r::.....,. "'"1 t::t. en _ 0 '/k f .' \ t'Þ CD::T:,:( 0 õ· ("þ t:I ) "'\<;'~( t:I~CDg.gt:tlCJ"'g.::S::sÐ; " '.\'1; ffJ'( ¡. S· g. OJ 8 ~ ~ '< CD '" CD@ ~..., ·,'···-i~. _\ \ . j f ; ::s ~ c -..- ¡:¡.. n ~ n (JQ .,;. :"~j.\,,,' ., .' ?'. f!1..... 'TJ' :;0 9 0 n ~ æ . ." "-"", \. ::s v s= (1).... --, : :,~~.~:.:'\\" ,'I' ~ CD t¡;' - rJ'){J'Q ::;- E.. ~ tit e: , .,....._...i',:} f [~ a. - ~ õ' ã p. e ~Jg $4.()-~::SS c' ¡;. 0 c:: ~. - ::3 tH ¡;. ~ iQ E D. No g ~ ~S· ~ g t'Þ O. ~ ('þ ~ ('þ - , .., HDCDC Higher Dimensions Community Development Corp, Inc. 4472 Okeechobee Road Ft. Pierce, Fl34947 =::2:==("2("2 I'll I'll I'll 0 0 0 -= .... -= = .. ~ .... \C I'll In ~ ;;;¡ S" =- _0 .... 0 a _Þ" ::S" .... 0 ~ \C ØI = ¡;;¡ B-- a ~ ~ e. ::-~ 0- ~ l:1l:I= ::s ~ o 0 _ ~ !=' =- ~ ~'::E ;' . ØI::S I'II~-= . ::I fl. tD =-In'; Õ I'II~ s. a ØI I'll == N - I'll == - = .... \C =- I'll .. = .... a I'll ... -, In .... o ::s In .... ::s ~ ~ ~~ ~" ~ '1, ~ Ì" N '\ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ (t ~ ~ ~ .~.) r ~ ~ f n d ~ ... tctJ:j ~ 1;; () 0 S' 0 CD 3: n 0 CD ::s 70 ~ 0 :Þ' 3: 70 03 7' CD 1-'_ 11 C fT1 ;¡¡ () » z - CD Z 0 -i C) "00 - fT1 3'0 ::II -i d g'O fT1 OJ :::'0 tj Vì fT1 ~i'i () ~ C) _. rt tj ¡:¡ ¡:: fT1 9 ::s () fT1 -i ¡; 1-" 70 I ::3 rt . fT1 e: ...... . ::3 (1) 70' 0<> U! , k j" "-' AGENDA REQUEST "'" ITEM NO. ~ DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUN1Y COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 01-06 - Property Maintenance Regulations - Permission to Advertise BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board grant permission to advertise Ordinance No. 01-06. Staff also recommends that the Board request that the Local Planning Agency review the draft ordinance before the Board schedules its public hearing. COMMISSION ACTION: [¡Q APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ouglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget i¿<-../ Can. Dev. Dir., ~ Code Compliance Mgr : D Eff. 5/96 Originating Dept. Public Works Dir: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) '-' ",.¡ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 01-420 DATE: March 16,2001 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 01-06 - Property Maintenance Regulations - Permission to Advertise ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: At the request of Commissioner Barnes, County staff drafted Ordinance No. 01-06 which, if adopted, would establish property maintenance regulations for unincorporated St. Lucie County. The draft regulations are patterned after regulations currently in effect in the City of Fort Pierce. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board grant permission to advertise Ordinance No. 01-06. Staff also recommends that the Board request that the Local Planning Agency review the draft ordinance before the Board schedules its public hearing. DSM/caf Attachment ¥ ,..", ORDINANCE NO. 01-06 AN ORDINANCE CREATING CHAPTER 1-16.1 (pROPERTY MAINTENANCE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINA1'{CES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, FURTHER CREATING ARTICLE I (pROPERTY MAINTENANCE REGULATIONS), CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-1 (SHORT TITLE); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-2 (APPLICABILITY) WHICH ESTABLISHES STANDARDS FOR THE CONTINUED MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS OR PREMISES; CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-3 (NATURE OF ARTICLE); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-4 (DEFINITIONS); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-5 (BUILDING SURVEY); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-6 (INSPECTIONS); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-7 (DUTY OF OWNER AND OCCUPANT); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-8 (MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-9 (VACANT BUILDINGS); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-10 (EXTERIOR PROPERTY AND LANDSCAPING); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-11 (EXTERIOR AREAS); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-12 (REPLACEMENT OF STORE FRONTS); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-13 (OCCUPANCY OFV ACANT UNITS); CREATING SECTION 1-16.1-14 (ENFORCEMENT); PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION; AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. This Board has found and declared that the establishment and maintenance of the standards set forth in this Ordinance are essential to the prevention of blight and decay, and the safeguarding of public health, safety and welfare. 2. It is hereby declared that all land and structures, including, but not limited to, residential dwellings, commercial property, businesses, whether occupied or vacant, and accessory structures, located in the unincorporated county, shall be maintained in conformity with the standards set out in this Ordinance so as to assure that these structures and properties will not adversely affect the neighborhood and the community at large. 3. It is found and declared by this Board that, by reason of lack of maintenance and StlU~1.. tluuuõl, words are deleted. Underlined words are added. I '- ...., progressive deterioration, certain structures and properties have the further effect of creating blighting conditions and initiating blighted areas and that, ifthe same are not curtailed and removed, such conditions will grow and spread and will, in time, necessitate the expenditure oflarge amounts of public funds to correct and eliminate the same. 4. This Board has further found by reason of timely regulations and restrictions as herein contained, the growth of blight may be prevented and the neighborhood and property values thereby maintained, the desirability and amenities of residential and non-residential uses and neighborhoods enhanced and the public health, safety and welfare protected and fostered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. CREATION OF CHAPTER 1-16.1 (PROPERTY MAINTENANCE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND COMPILED LAWS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. Chapter 1-16.1 (property Maintenance), of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws is hereby created to read as follows: CHAPTER 1-16.1 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE ARTICLE I. PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REGULATIONS Section 1-16.1-1. Short title. From and after the effective date hereof. this article shall be known as the "St. Lucie County Property Maintenance Ordinance." Section 1-16.1-2. Applicabilitv. The provisions of this article shall be applicable as a standard in the unincorporated county. Everv portion of a building or premises as set forth herein shall complv with the provisions ofthis article. irrespective of when such building shall have been constructed. altered or repaired. and irrespective of anv permits or licenses which shall have been issued for the use or occupancv ofthe building or premises. This article shall establish standards for the continued maintenance of all buildings or premises and does not replace or modify standards otherwise established for the construction. repair. alteration or use of buildings. equipment or facilities. In anv event where a provision ofthis article is found to be in conflict with a provision of anv zoning. building. electrical. plumbing. fire. safety or health ordinance. or anv regulation adopted pursuant thereto. or anv other ordinance. code or regulation of the county. the provisions which established the highest standards shall prevail. St,,,,,!.. lluvu!,,1. words are deleted. Underlined words are added. 2 ¥ '-' Section 1-16.1-3. Nature of article. Nothing in this article shall be deemed to abolish or impair existing remedies of the county or its officers or agencies relating to the removal or demolition of anv building which are deemed to be dangerous. unsafe or unsanitary. and this article shall be deemed and treated as an addition thereto. and cumulative of the powers therein. This article is further declared to be remedial and essential to the pub lic interest. Section 1-16.1-4. Definitions. As used in this article. the following words and terms shall be the definitions ascribed to them in this section: Accessory use means a structure. the use of which is incidental to that of the main building. and which is attached thereto or located on the same premises. Building means a structure which encloses space: a structure which gives protection or shelter for any occupancy or use. The term "building" shall be construed as if followed bv the phrase "or part thereof." Clean and/or sanitary means a condition of reasonable cleanliness and sanitation which is fit for human habitation or occupancv under contemporary community standards. unless otherwise suecified in this article. Code enforcement division includes the divisions of code compliance and building and zoning of the county. Director means the public works director or his authorized designee. Dwelling means anv building or structure orpart thereof used and occupied for human habitation or intended to be so used. Dwelling unit shall mean anv room or grOUP of rooms located within a dwelling and forming a single habitable unit within the facilities which are based or intended to be used for living. sleeping. cooking or eating. Exterior propertY areas means anv open space on the Premises. Occupant means anv person living. sleeping. cooking or eating m. or having actual possession of a dwelling unit or building. Open space area means that portion of a premises not occupied bv a building. structure. or pavement: an area ofthe premises normallv referred to as the vard or landscaping area. SL1U~k. tluuuõh words are deleted. Underlined words are added. 3 """ ~ Operator means anv person who has charge. care or control of a multiple residence. in which dwelling units are let or offered for occupancy. Owner means anv person. firm. corporation or legal entity who alone or iointly or severally with others: ill Shall have legal or beneficial title to anv building or premises: and/or ill Shall have charge. care or control of anv building or premises. as owner or agent of the owner. or as a fiduciary of the estate of the owner or anv officer appointed bv the court. Anv such person thus representing the actual owner. shall be bound to complv with the terms of this article and anv notice of rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto. to the same extent as ifhe were the owner. Person shall include the owner. occupant. mortgagee. or vendee in possession. assigns of rents. receiver. executor. trustee. lessee. agent or anv other person. firm or corporation directlv or indirectlv in control of a building or premises. Premises means a lot. plot or parcel ofland including the buildings or structures thereon. Rubbish means all combustible and noncombustible waste. iunk. and debris. Structure means the combination of anv materials. whether fixed or portable. forming a construction. including buildings. The word "structure" shall be construed as though followed bv the words "or part or parts thereof." Section 1-16.1-5. Buildinl!' survey. The code enforcement division shall be authorized to make survevs in any areas of the unincorporated county to determine the general condition of all buildings. structures. and premises. to determine the general condition thereof. whether used for human habitation; and to determine the lack offacilities. unsafe and unsanitary conditions. extent of overcrowding and otherrelevant factors. This survev shall assist in the determination of the allocation of enforcement personnel and resources. Section 1-16.1-6. Inspections. Anv dulv authorized inspector from the code enforcement division shall be authorized to make inspections to determine the condition of dwellings. dwelling units. rooming houses. hotels. commercial buildings. and all other buildings and premises within the unincorporated county in order to safeguard the health. safety. and welfare of the public. The inspector shall be authorized to enter anv building or premises as provided bv law at anv reasonable time. or at such other times as mav be necessary in an emergencv. for the purpose of performing the duties of such office under this article. in accordance with the procedures herein prescribed. Except in emergencies endangering SllU"h. llllVU&l words are deleted. Underlined words are added. 4 '-' 'WI the Dub lic health. safety and welfare. the insDector shall enter a building or Dremises on Iv UDon the Drior consent of the Derson lawfullv in OCCUDancv thereof or the Derson having legal right or Dossession thereof. or in accordance with the Drovisions of this section or as otherwise authorized bv law. The insDector shall further be authorized to obtain a search or insDection warrant to the fullest extent allowed bv Section 933.20. et seo.. Florida Statutes. Section 1-16.1-7. Duty of owner and occuDant. Every OCCUDant and owner of a dwelling or dwelling unit. building:. structure. or Dremises shall keeD in clean and sanitary condition that Dart of the dwelling:. building: or Dremises thereof. which he occuDies. controls. or owns. Section 1-16.1-8. Maintenance ofbuilding:s and structures. Every building:. structure. dwelling. dwelling: unit. and accessory structure. including: garag:es. caroorts. storag:e building:s. and fences shall comDly with the following reouirements: ill Eyery foundation. exterior and interior wall. roof. floor. ceiling:. window and exterior door shall be structurallv sound and maintained in g:ood reDair. ill Every building: shall be keDt in a reasonablv clean and sanitary condition reasonablv free from rodents. insects and vermin. ill Tbe roof of every building: and accessory structure shall be adeouatelv drained of rainwater. All roofs. in addition to exterior walls. and areas around doors. windows. chimneys and other Darts of a building: shall be so maintained as to keeD water from entering: the building:. Exterior walls. roofs and other Darts of the building: shall be free from loose and unsecured obiects and material. Such obiects or materials shall be removed. reDaired or reDlaced. ill All the exterior surfaces subiect to deterioration. and all exterior eXDosed surfaces not inherently resistant to deterioration. shall be DroDerlv maintained. reD aired. coated. treated. or sealed to Drotect them from deterioration. weathering:. and from the elements bv Daint or other apDroved Drotective coating:. aDDlied in a workmanlike fashion. Exterior surfaces which have been damag:ed or show evidence of dry rot or other deterioration. including: cracked. chiDDed. and Deeling: Daint or other coating, shall be reD aired or reD laced and finished in a workmanlike manner. ill Every Dlumbing: fixture. waterDiDe. waste DiDe and drain shall be maintained in g:ood sanitary working: condition. free from defects. leaks and obstruction. ® All fences. whether wood. metal. chainlink. or other aDDroved material shall be maintained in reasonably good reD air. Anv fence in a state of disreDair shall be reDlaced or reDaired. Sb.""k. tluu"¡sll words are deleted. Underlined words are added. 5 ....... ...,., ill Steps. walks. drivewavs and similar paved areas of anv premises shall be maintained in a reasonablv clean and sanitarY condition. free ofanv holes. substantial cracking. or other hazard. Such areas shall also be swept clean of dirt and debris on a regular basis and otherwise maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Section 1-16.1-9. Vacant buildin!!'s. The owner of a vacated building. whether a dwelling unit. business premises. or accessorY structure. shall take such steps and perform such acts as mav be required of him from time to time to insure that the building and its adjoining vards remain safe. secure. clean and sanitary. and do not present a hazard to adjoining property or to the public. All openings. including doors and windows. which are covered or closed for access shall be provided with painted exterior-grade plvwood closures. matched in color to the building. unless the same are provided with awnings. storm panels. or other similar commerciallv available products designed for this intended use and installed in a workmanlike manner. Section 1-16.1-10. Exterior orooerty and landscaoin!!'. All landscaping shall be well-maintained so that lawns. hedges. bushes and trees shall be kept trimmed and free from becoming overgrown and unsightlv where exposed to public view and where the same may constitute a blighting factor therebv depreciating adioining property. Such maintenance shall include. but not be limited to the replacement of trees and shrubs which have died or otherwise been destroyed. Section 1-16.1-11. Exterior areas. Exterior areas of all parcels. including vards. courts. steps. walks. drivewavs. parking areas and similar paved areas shall be maintained so as to afford safe passage under normal use and weather conditions. Materials or objects which would detract from the open space character of an uncovered and unenclosed area. including. but not limited to the unsightlv or disorganized storage of metal. lumber. paper. or plastic obiects of any kind or nature which cause an unsightlv condition or cause a substantial depreciation in property values in the immediate neighborhood shall not be permitted. The exterior of everY structure shall be so maintained and kept in good repair. so as not. in the case of excessive scaling of paint or excessive mildew. to tend to cause a substantial depreciation in property values in the immediate vicinity. The exterior surfaces shall be kept free from materials. objects and conditions which will have an adverse effect on adjacent premises. Section 1-16.1-12. Reolacement of store fronts. It shall be unlawful for anv person owning. renting or occupving a business premises in the unincoroorated county to fail to repair. replace or rebuild the plate glass window or other store front of such business premises which has been broken. damaged. destroved or removed within a period of ten (J 0) davs after such breakage. damage. destruction or removal occurs. Business establishments mav have installed thereon securelv fastened painted plvwood boarding to 31:1"..1. tluu,,¡;l, words are deleted. Underlined words are added. 6 '- ..., temnorarilv cover un the broken. damaged. destroved or removed elate glass window or store rront for a neriod oftime not to exceed ten (10) davs. erovided that the renair orrenlacement of such glass and store rront is timely made in comnliance with this section. The Board may susuend enforcement of this section where damages occur as a result of a hurricane or other material disaster and where the Board determines that it is not nossible to reulace or renair the damage within the ten (10) day time rrame. Section 1-16.1-13. Occunancv of vacant units. No nerson shall occunv as owner-occunant or nermit to be occunied bv another anv vacant residential or nonresidential building unless or until it is in good renair. clean. sanitary. in habitable condition. and in full comnliance with all erovisions of this article. Section 1-16.1-14. Enforcement. This article shall be enforceable in the same manner as any other codes of ordinances or laws of the county as nrovided elsewhere in Chanter 162. Florida Statutes. or as otherwise nrovided bv law. PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas ofSt. Lucie County, and adopted prior to January 1, 1969, St. Lucie County ordinances and St. Lucie County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shaIl not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be effective upon filing with the Office of Secretary of State. PART F. ADOPTION. $[,,,..1. tluv..."l, words are deleted. Underlined words are added. 7 .... 'will After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson Vice-Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner John D. Bruhn xx XX XX XX XX PART G. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through G shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this XX day of XX, 2001. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY g:/attylordnance/200 110 1-06 St.L1"k, lI...uL15I, words are deleted. Underlined words are added. 8 "-' AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO. 6B DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [ x ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. Mcintyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution 01-87 - A resolution determining that deferred deposit or deferred presentment transactions violate the Usury Law. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAilABLE: ) PREVIOUS ACTiON: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board consider Resolution 01-87. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] APPROVED [] DENIED ~] OTHER: Pulled prior to meeting. To notify both sides to be present to discuss issue. [X] County Attorn~y: Jx Review and Approvals []Manaqt:rtlð'nt & Budget: [ ]Purchsf!>ing: [ ] Information T ð'ch.: [ 1 Publíç Wori::!> Diro::ctor [ ] Solid Waf!>te Mgr []Financo:::(cho::ck for copy only, if applicable:) Effective 5/96 . . ..... '-' INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Katherine Mackenzie-Smith, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 01-473 DATE: April 4, 2001 SUBJECT: Resolution 01-87 - A Resolution Requesting the State of Florida Enforce the Usury Law and other Consumer Protection against Payday Lenders BACKGROUND: Attached is a resolution prepared by Clayton Yates, Esq. requesting that deferred deposit or deferred presentment transactions violate the Usury Laws of the State of Florida. Mr. Yates presents payday loans as a predatory lending practice wherein desperate consumers in the County are charged usurious interest for short term loans. Currently, there are bills pending before the Senate and House that would regulate deferred presentments. Senator Campbell's Senate BilI314 has passed the Committee on Banking and Insurance. Representative Barreiro's House Bill 0213 has passed the House committee on Banking and the House Committee on Crime Prevention Corrections and Safety. These bills create the Deferred Presentment Act. The bills provide that no fees in excess of 10% of the amount ñnanced may be charged, limits the transaction amount to $500 and prohibits rollovers. Mr. Yates will be available to provide more information on the Resolution. RECOM MEN D A TION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board consider Resolution 01-87titled A Resolution Requesting the State of Florida Enforce the Usury Law and other Consumer Protections against Payday Lenders. Respectfully submitted ¡U-- KMS/cb Attachment Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney ; -- .....,; RESOLUTION NO. 01-87 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE STATE OF FLORIDA ENFORCE THE USURY LAW AND OTHER CONSUMER PROTECTIONS AGAINST P A YDA Y LENDERS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. That payday loans also known as "deferred presentment" or "deferred deposit" transactions constitute predatory lending wherein desperate consumers in this County are charged exorbitantly usurious interest for short term loans and that this practice has become a significant blight on this community and throughout the State of Florida.. 2. That Florida law has wisely made usurious lending illegal for more than 100 years. 3. That the plain language and legislative history of Florida Statutes Chapter 560, the Monev Transmitter's Act do not permit payday loans or deferred deposit transactions in any fashion and provide no exemption from the usury provisions of Florida Statutes, Chapter 687 Lendinl! Practices or the safeguards of Chapter 516 the Florida Consumer Finance Act. 4. That therefore payday loans, deferred deposit or deferred presentment transactions violate the usury law and the consumer protection provisions of Florida Statutes, Chapter 516. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida. 1. This Board strongly condemns the practice of payday lending at highly usurious rates of interest and requests the State of Florida through its agencies such as the Department of '¥ """ Banking and Finance, the Attorney General's Office and the various State Attorney's Offices enforce the existing statutory law to prevent this type of predatory lending to Florida consumers. 2. The County Administrator is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to Governor Jeb Bush and the Legislative Delegation for St. Lucie County. After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chair Frannie Hutchinson XX Vice Chairman Doug Coward XX Commission Paula A. Lewis XX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this day of April, 2001. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY - - C) ::s ° C ....... :-' o s:: Q) ° Q)O-C CIJ ....... >. O-CQ) ....... Q) J: - ClJQ).......s:: -Cs::o~ Q) _ CIJ I- Q):: Q.Q) S::~::SQ. I- >. ° Q) ~Q)~E ° ~ m m -ëi) ° CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJ m Q) --E ~ CIJ ~ s::-- EoJ:Q) oCIJ.......CIJ OI-ClJO Q) CIJ ° J: Q. ::s J: OQ)OO m s:: _~ = wo-cm , "ÃGENDA REOUEST ITE~NO. 7A DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: Art in Public Places Art and Design Committee BACKGROUND: The Cultural Affairs Councii is requesting Nominations for the Art in Public Places Art and Design Committee. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that each Commissioner select one applicant for the Art in Public Places Art and Design Committee. [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Dorothy Roberts (Bruhn) Jon Ward (Coward) Leland Carpenter (Lewis) Robbin Lynch (Hutchinson) Ramon Trias (Barnes) COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 """' '-III VOTING BALLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBue PLACES ART AND DESIGN COMMfIT££ MCH COMMISSION£R S£lÆ.CTS ONt: (1) Ramon Trias V1~ 1'--" Jon Ward DC Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts ~ß Patricia Pawlak Will;",,, rilla Patty McGee Robbin Lynch ÝH Leland Carpenter 71- COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: ""'" ...., MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: DIANE TURNER DATE: APRIL 2, 2001 SUBJECT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PUBLIC ART AND DESIGN COMMITTEE Please review the attached applications. You will each be asked to select one member for the Art in Public Places Public Art and Design Committee at the April 10, 2001 Board Meeting. Thank you. dlt c: Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator Heather Young, Assistant County Attarney U~d6¡01 FR1 12: 24 HX 4621769 LEISURE SERVICES Ma"-16__o,~ lo,.37A Ft P; c::e P'an";,,~ ,r, L:'~Ù. ·C:,,·'H; ;;::.r~~~<"""",,_ _ .I.~".' ...~I(I< ,!j~~~lCE.~ ..., --' ,. . .... ,¡,., '-"-' '41 (102 P_o,l ~õöl- , " NAME, ST. Luel~ eOl/NTY CUL11J1\A.L Al,')iAHl'i COUNCIL AWl' l'UIJLIC AnT .r. DESIGN COMJl,tITTEE ^PPLrCJ\TI0N "ST. LUCIE eOUNTY RtSIDENC:Y IŒQUlJUo:D.' !'-A.MoN 1""1 A.S "----.. ADDRESS; 7 0 3 fc)",",\" FI.-OIlIDA ~ve"'\iE ..-,--.... f) £I(,t.G fL I 1 34'':;0 __~ (HOME) 4" 0 - ~2 "0 (WURK) TELF.I'IIONENlfMl\":RS:_1:" ð - 70 DVSJNEsMtlo'ILIAT10N, c::. ¡ ¡y 0 f ~o ~ T 1> \'L.e en ~ oç. "Pe \If Lo I' '1CIV í_ CtJL TURA.LAFFlLJA110N(S): (-' 1E'~t.t' . , '-- --- A1U'S £XI'¡¡:RT[SE/D^CKCROli l/D:~(..lj:éLo It.. "NT) "'AS'Te:~'$ p~c."EE-r J toJ Þ.1t!- H rn. CIIJ,c..6. 10 '1 o\ U e I( r f: ~ 0 c.e I Ai t. , ry lL#o.NIIIIN ~ AAJf) O~ÞrtV 'DES tC:.N. --'------- ,. LEASt; INUICA n.: ANY Ol11EI( 'F.nnNEN'l' INFORMATION; ST Ll'CI~ COUNTY CULT{JAA.LAFF~'RS COUNCIL 1300 Vjr~Dìa ^''<:IIUO, Adlllì,,¡',r..Unn Annt1l t'nct J>ì.rto, ¡"J..,.id" 3"¡!f1l;¡ VAT!.': RECEIVED: 03/12;01 MON 10:57 FAX 4621769 LEISURE SERvICES ~3'11101 05:55 FAX 581 5$' ~248 LONG WIND PlœLIS O~IO <n ~!'i;.l~:,J.°!rfi :f,I~'_'_'._'I"'_ -l"'~'_' U!SVJŒ SER~I.C'E~. ...::-' ¡lj0(12 ~Ol IiIOOl .- -.-'.' I....., :otã. ,t.. CU: ICOUNT'¡- C\J LTURAL ÀFJo'^I1~ COUNC!t.. AI 1'1' J"U Ll~1~R1' 4< DESIGN COM7wl1'1TI!:1i: .\PPLICI\"'ON ··S "L;GŒ COtlN'TY R£SIDENCY REQUJIlEDu :Jõ1J Nß...I) . ,~ ðM-I.Jc¡í 11l- ~-1 fer . I ?,['-ðU,8 (lJOME) ~.. (WURK) lIUSINP.SW"nLlAT N, ~fIf«-j ~MvtJ POGtJst!t{)(;- I '.'. . --- CUL.1'UlWAFFrLI..\ 0 (8): PAsr C'JIJItµrW/ C/.Iif./JUl, /fJ:M1t5 CtJr.JiX¡L; '1M ~ 'f. ,s MStXlA-rtf:1#.J/ Ítøt~; ~DS ~/"'Ý ARTS '''<RTISI!/.l.o.N., /!éeII. ~ Iw/ðJ/ -/lJ#JPfO$- - ~,.t:;Il...~.~ ðl5l~ -¡ NAME: A])J)tú:.s~ ; T1ëLF.1'IIONt:NtJMU~ ~~ ..-- TU'EJU' EJU'INENTINFOltMATIONõ ......- II.) (})ppr( ~ ..- ST. I.UClE COUN1"Y Ct1I.fTtlRA,(. AFFAIRS COtINCJL 2300 "irzù¡ia ^'·DAUD. Ad:aticlsrPlltlðft Al)þC>JI. tOon rlc~Q, Flari&lll J 'az I I . . I I I I DATE RECEIVlm: 03·'12101 JlON 10:57 FAX 4621769 LEISURE SERVICES ~·Aff AI~ ..., ~\I.) ê ,¥l ~ucie County Board of County Commissioners Application for ServinQ on County Boards and Committees ~ Thank you for applYing for a position on on~ of St. Lucie County's many advi$ory boards ond cotTImittees. The minimum requ¡rem~nts for committee membership are: . *Must be a County resident .Must not be related to another committ~e member, County Commissioner or County employee involved with the committee of interest *Must not be employed by the sameb~sine.ss entity as other committee members. *Must not serve on more thon 2 County committees Not~; Some committees have additional req~irements. please inquire when submitting this application. In oddition, service on comm¡tt~es with plonning, zoning or natural resources responsibilities may require disclos~re of financial interests_ Please complete the following information: L PLEASE INDICATE THE COMMITTEE(S) YOU ARE INTERESTED IN. SEE THE REVERSE SIDE 2. NAME: Dorothy "DeeDee" Roberts PHONE: 878-7263 3. HOME ADDRESS: 611 Ash Street. Port St. I'ud.., _I' ,4Q,)2 4. WHICH COMMISSION DISTRICT DO YOU LIVE IN? 5. BUSINESS/OCCUPATION MU<..lIm "lip......; ,,().. 6. BUSINESS ADDRESS: St.. ,'lid.. Cnllnf:y 14; <Tn..; ,.,,1 Mil""",,, 414 Seaway Drive. F .P. 34949 PHONE: 462.-1795 7 BRIEF RESUME OF EDUCA TION & EXPERIENCE:(pleQ$e C1ttach resume) 8. DO YOV CVRRENTlY SERVE ON A COUNTY COMM!TTEE(S). IF SO, PLEASE LIST; Hi£tðriè~' r.nmmi~.;nn 9 WHY DO YOU THINK YOU ARE QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE(S) INDICATED? I have been involved with fine arts for 20 years (see it..m 7 ahnv.~ and "av. a tlÞøp '1l'1tø.......:f" ;n ,..+høtt'" ","1+"""'a""~- 10. WOULD YOU CONSIDER SERVING ON ANOTHER BOARD OTHER THAN THE ONE(S) STATED ABO'lE?(PLEASE SPECIFY) n. COMMENTS; SIGNATURE; 1f " '~ATE; ~1///t.Z.1.t~ ,J., tIíJ7J AnON WILL REMAIN EFFo/rVE FOR ~Nt YEAR ' Submit to;St. L~cie County Adm¡~ìstr(1tor'$ Office 2300 Virginia Av~., Ft. Pierce.. FI. 34982 Phone; 462-1453 PLEASE INDICATE THE COMMITTEE(S) YOU ARE INTERESTED IN, SEE THE REVERSE SIDE NAME:_PATKIc...¡A -PAWLA.K PHONE:5''='1 S'::¡s-- 95$0 HOME ADDRESS: 5 O~ SOUTH INDIAI\J R,IVER. û~ FðKT f"ê~:U~~C FL WHICH COMM!SSION DISTRICT DO YOU LIVE IN? eðYV\M RurC If I tJsðIJ BUSINESS/OCCUPATION \NTERIOg OfS)(~/'Jf'r< /WATER COLóR II\.J'S,T~Uc.T(}t\ BUSINESS ADDRESS: 12.2. A.E. 6AQ.K US ST f="T P, f.reCF PHONE: Y GoD 5 S l'l BRIEF RESUME OF EDUCA TION & EXPERIENCE:(please attach resume) CL'i:.VtLAftJµ/~ Œ.DOP'éK If\J"STI-iU¡)~ 6F .ART - DESlbA) M!'\Joí2 WOl2k'7i) FOK: I() 'jf2S A") A C'árYlME'f'C-IAL- Af'Ti6T FE'fF LArX é: GI2A¡)H Ie AI'2TI ST - TFŒH I\) Ii'AI_ ILLU"'3T~TIOtJ OWIJ'i:[) , OPff2.ATC¡;D HAYES IfVTf/2I()~..5 (lIv-r112/0e. Df~lbf...) t3USIII)C(<7s"l DO YOU CURRENTLY SERVE ON A COUNTY COMMITTEE(S). IF SO. PLEASE II v~a,,-; ./ LIST: NO WHY DO YOU THINK YOU ARE QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE(S) INDICATED? II) /lOD/TIDtV fO I\~,Y {)é'SfbU QuAL./TI<C:.S¡ J HAVe. A ST(OIJG ARí (31-\Ckf>r)ùt-.JD. i2'7/A II.... é: MAI2.t<!'Tilvb ÝY'Pz/2JE fo.JCJ' / . WOULD YOU CONSIDER SERVING ON ANOTHER BOARD OTHER THAN THE ONE(S) STATED ABOVE?(PLEASE SPECIFY) UO COMMENTS: I Am IU,":K £SPf[) ilJ -(1\'1" Av() F'f'tL I IAJ()VL./f) I-JAV'f JlY\ðief Co 0",",/\ ýV) I IT ~'L SIGNATURE: .'4t.-I/'[Llj£{)çI/ IJ~fº--ATE: S/ftj/~( APPLICA TION WILL REMAIN EFFECTIVE FOR ONE YEAR Submit to:St. Lucie County Administrator's Office 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce. FI. 34982 Phone: 462-1453 9. 11. '-' Œctltu.m.L A~ fnPP .,¡ St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Application for ServinQ on County Boards and Committees Thank you for applying for a position on one of St. Lucie County's many advisory boards and committees. The minimum requirements for committee membership are: * Must be a County resident *Must not be related to another committee member, County Commissioner or County employee involved with the committee of interest *Must not be employed by the same business entity as other committee members. *Must not serve on more than 2 County committees Note: Some committees have additional requirements, please inquire when submitting this application. In addition, service on committees with planning, zoning or natural resources responsibilities may require disclosure of financial interests. Please complete the following information: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. (I () LnJt€f\L, AFFA 1/2 S (I Õ¡)/JC/l-- TIJ ðFF7.t:. ¡i-i-;:.)T ~ ST. LUCI~UNTY ADVISORY BOARDS A~COMMITTEE CITIZEN APPOINTMENTS AVAILABLE Please check the committees you are interested in: o Beach Preservation Task Force o Board of Adjustment o Central Florida Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc. o Children's Services Council o Citizen's Budget Development Committee o Code Enforcement Board o Community Development Block Grant Citizen's Advisory Task Force o Contractors Certifica1Îon Board ..¡;/ Cultural Affairs Council o - Emergency Medical ServTèes Advisory Council o Environmental Hearing Board o FI. Dept. of Children and Family Services Committee District 15 o FI. Dept. of Children and Family Services Nominating Qualifications Review Committee District 15 o Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee o Historical Commission o Housing Finance Authority o Investment Committee o Library Advisory Board o Planning & Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency o Restudy Coordination Committee o St. Lucie County Recreation Advisory Board o Tourist Development Council o Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc. o Treasure Coast Regional Economic District/Overall Economic Development Program Committee o Vegetation Protection Committee ,:,1. 1_1.11_11: UJ. I-j i I Utl'IL I I" .J.'.,. _,I.,.l -·"-¡I.,~ - 1....'"--1'.' UL I. VV J.'"1',;",_. , ,'..'... '-' ..., ST. LUCIE COUNTY CULTUHAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL At!'!' !'UULIC ART & D.C:SIGN COMMITTEE AI'PLlCATION "ST. LUCIE COUNTY RESIDENCY REQUlRJW·· ADD1lliSS: t'Å.". \ÜJL{-).ff'o 7. VJ\e-í 5Qo4 NdHe. ?c...~ -:þ-, -çc. 9\~f~ 'Ç-L 3t-/qS! \ TELEI}llON~::NUMHE {S: 4 (pCp - 2.'-1 L( () (HOME) 410/0 - 2 Lftl() (WOIU() llUSINESSAFFILlATlO]'\: &--br .,....J)S.UL""0 L,..::> IV .J f r "'- <.."Ì"'ò ,,:, ;..) &-.- L- i e ~"'" / 0, / '"'+- (-~ c_ J / #«:,. Ü) pc--~ "- / / ' CULTURALAFFlLIATION(S): Vcr:::.1=: p,......"',.:>~J i-~~"~ D-t- NAME: ~ Mc-~",-i A- rl) , (t.. tV' ,,;,,- c~ \-f ",1'0- \ J<> <" I ",,}'7 , ARTS EXI'ERTISE/lJACKGROUND: TJ.. ...,,-,-- C_r-' "'-prr,,-, (,_-\.,'>---, I , è-F- :b t ~ _..)~ ,-,r CÀ..r-c:' .'J:. <.:" r- .'-0 C Q f Ie: ...+ ~/ . 7' Ác.--" ~. - 0) -....../!, +~ ""('+- '~,'~ J.. CV+IJ +-- (roJ ~ ¿" c.::"""r -e ~.- 6e<~.-../ ,--,',.J i.,) S J [..,r II -ok/ / " c~ r-. >- c I '^)) Á ~ v~/"-- J ßV'\C~I'V') / Cl.C -h ~ <L l..é)o.- k'.. Pa.&11'DlU\ct £""; ,'r" .,,~.- '~" / le.- uj} c. ,..... / D,(<I.-.. C;~.~/ t./ ~I / I (' >.-r ]f,v-~1-'l0.- _(.\.r ,2 S" ." '0 ,'-.,./. 'LL,," _ "-- .,j)., 6 "'"rJ , l'LEASE INDICATEANY OTHER I'ERTJNI~NTlN1?ORMATION: -/ L. i) . -I--l,\.::¡...I" L U ....;... "-~-:.....r" t ,.-..J ',.~ +L..... .'- r t "-ü~Þ"'Y\("'" 0"\./1 )"'7 . (.-J )vt ", ..... : ¡--!.,. "-f-'~~ .. ST. LlICIE COUNTY CULTURAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL 2300 Virginia Avcnuc, Adlllini~tration Anncx Fort l'icrçc, 1>lorida 3~9S2 DATE RECEIVED: --.--.-,-.-.....---- ':,I~ LI)I_1L I_U. 1'\1 ¡UrJ'ILI ¡-,J' ,_'1_'1'''-1'.'_-1'1''-1'_' UI_1. ''', -1-.... '~'_' . '.'~ '- """ ST. LUCl.E COUNTY CULTURAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL 11.11'1' l'UULlC AKJ' & D.ESIGN COMMITTEE AI'PLICATlON "ST. LUCIE COUNTY RÈSlDENCY REQUIRJm*" NAME: ~Prí\'/ tJ\ °G-66 ADDllliSS: L\-o \ ~u_;tn DQ;-eA-~ -:J)\2-- I ~R-l PIerce ~,3~CJ~ q TELEPHONENUMBERS: % 6 55ll (HOMEiftdJ .3 i <:¡s- ~ (WORK) . , nUSINESSAFJlILIATION;--gI\-e.....~ S ~ThD\ ¿-J . I h-RßW\ E-S ~sPrßfe-z-z F ./ . CULTURALAlìFILIATlON(S): ~'"1'I:\Lfì\ F -0 ~\ - (')LO~ fRA-M\n'(~ lSVSS. ~w~ ~8Z- Ð\-e{\/:::>", \ E='" Xì (QJ ).. 5 TCì ['V\ AÑü C-sA-t\eA' ~ J AIUS EXI'ERTISE/lIACKGROUND: ~ I'LEASE lNDlCATE,\NY OTHER I'£RTJNENTIN1'ORMATION: (\A \..{ So Vì S \;\9,,)(\ \\~\ \~"A S S CÀ t\) \) Ð fe f' þ.;-p: / ---I1-tE n' ^ -e S I ,- C""A\~ KN Ç) (b.ÁÀSiöM. 'Ç-R,p..,\f\6lQ~ , (\(\ ¢ -0 LL.0 \-1' \ A V\A.. ,-" "-- "" ST. LUCIE COUNTY CULTURAL AFFAlRS COUNCIL 2300 Virginia Avcnue, Administration Anncx Forll'icrcc, Florid!. 3-1982 DATE RECEIVED: '_'I, L'_"_lL '_I_I. n. 11..11" I'll., I 1,.1 '''I -,' ¡-'''+',' UL I. -"- 1-.·.__· .'-'.- '- -....I ST. LUCIE COUNTY CULTURAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL AII'I' PUBLIC ART & DESIGN COMMlTTIŒ ¡\I'I'LIC¡\TION "ST. LUCIE COUNTY RESIDENCY REQUIlŒO" NArvlE:~obbì () c., L'1 n ch ADDIŒSS: Z- 505 -1loclb-lü.dl.anRi\l.er- De\\Ì~ Sf", UK-le vi Ik~~EL-~_3~JL--. TELEI'! IONEN II M BE RS:~;itLL--J.lb~ -97'-lc.J(1 0 M E) llUSINESSAFFI LlATI ON: }\{)\Jc;ew.i£e<-- ---.,--.-- ---....- (WORK) ._-- ----------------. ._-------~ -- CU:LTUl(AL^FFIL[¡\, ,]ON(S):.ro.£.m.~~O~~c..1:::..us Gt~ ---------- .---------- ---. ARTS EXI'ERTISE/lIACKC;ROUNO:~-.L+ ì (\ C.ol~.In.~J2~1 q n .ù.r\\\H!,rsj~I2~~ 32 'P~C;f Dì(ec.-I-o,..--,,~Lm A.£~e..ClY'I/· 13~5. ?1a.lle.n1 - 't 11-2.. ~~o.r s. ~phØY / ~_At~.J(,L-C.~~~ PLEASE INDICATE ANY OTIIERPF.RTINENTINFORI\1ATION: .........--.---.---...- ._._._-~..-_. .--- ---..-------.. --~-_._..._.. ----.--.-.---.--- ST. LUCIE COUNTY CULTURAL Al<'FAlRS COUNCIL 2300 Virg,inia Avenue, Administration Anucx Fort I'¡ern, Floridn 34'1132 DATE IŒCElVElJ: :j/ d IL!_.~ '- '-' MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: DIANE TURNER DATE: APRIL 4, 2001 SUBJECT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PUBLIC ART AND DESIGN COMMITTEE Attached is an additional application that was received on April3'd for the Art in Public Places Public Art and Design Committee. This item will be on the April 10, 2001 Agenda. Thank you. dlt c: Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney '-' .., St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Application for Serving on County Boards and Committees Thank you for applying for a position on one of St. Lucie County's many advisory boards and committees. The minimum requirements for committee membership are: *Must be a County resident *Must not be related to another committee member, County Commissioner or County employee involved with the committee of interest *Must not be employed by the same business entity as other committee members *Must not serve on more 'than 2 County Committees Note: Some committees have additional requirements, please inquire when submitting this application. In addition, service on committees with planning, zoning or natural resources responsibilities may require disclosure of financial interest. Please complete the following information: 1. PLEASE INDICATE THE COMMITTEE(S) YOU ARE INTERESTED IN. C..,J t~ No.1 ¡¡6f"if'::> Cûúl!"il 2. NAME: :;>/(L, - PHONE: t/(Óo-)qìl or L¡ft,~l¡(,;Y~ 3. HOME ADDRESS: Pit/- .. F L } L'<1J . Pc~ t, I S 4. 5. 6. WHICH COMMISSION DISTRICT DO YOU LIVE IN? / ..i- r . ¡ BUSINESS/OCCUPATION: r e í I ell BUSINESS ADDRESS: N/A , 7. PHONE: /t.:l It / BRIEF RESUME OF EDUCATION & EXPERIENCE:(please attach resume) t~' l ./ / '.,-' - ~ " ,~___ f -J< ~- . L;, 1 c~ ¡ I 'J¡ (..' "\ (J...... -. J PC{ ), [IQ!,-,.,~E(-'r I.v~·fk.i¡t F'CJi-T O/P¡/{'e Cre", P . f- . t j l CL ¡.. ('jL'.+e 'J.. v,"( e ) , 10. DO YOU CURREN1LY SERVE ON A COUNTY COMMITTEE(S)? If' SO, PLEASE LIST: ¡\/ 0 WHY DO YOU TH K Y U RE QUALIFIED TO SERVE9NlHE COMM! EE(S») IND CATEI:)? . ....¿ a.. '.4 . . . Þ-~ - .- ".I.. . -; '\..A.,./L.Q.., (¿ ~ . W ULD YOU CONSIDER SERVING N A THER BOARD OTHER THAN THE ONE(S) STATED ABOVE? (PLEASE SPECIFY) IV 0 t (, r- tilt 5+; II Ie COMMENTS: .' 8. 9. 11. ~" .) .7~ /ì J Í£Æ. " 1/. -' II . ''Z1/Ct' ,I ~J.i'1 DATE: '7 - APPLICATION WILL R MAIN EFFEmVE FOR ONE YEAR Submit to: St. Lucie County Administrator's office 2300 Virginio Ave., Ft. Pierce, FI 34982 Phone: 462-1453 ~-()I SIGNATURE: '-' '-' Leland I:?a~ ea.-pente.- 8800 Okeechobee Road Fort Pierce, Florida 34945 (561) 460-7971 I'()UCA TI()~ 1963-1966 High School diploma, West Sioux High School Hawarden, lA I'M,()L()"- ,"I'~T 1985-1992 Clerk, United States Postal Service Fort Pierce, FL 1970-1985 Clerk, United States Postal Service Sioux Falls, SO 1973-1976 Minnesota Army Guard Luverne, MN 1966-1970 United States Air Force Sioux City, IA Detroit, MI V()LU~TI'I'[? I'X()I'[?II'~CI' 1987-2001 Conservation Alliance of Saint Lucie County Fort Pierce, FL 1989-1996 Board Member, Conservation Alliance Fort Pierce, FL 1990-1991 Vice President, Conservation Alliance Fort Pierce, FL 1992-1994 President, Conservation Alliance Fort Pierce, FL 1996 Environmentalist of the Y ear Award of Saint Lucie County 1987-2001 Turtle Mothers of Saint Lucie County Fort Pierce, FL 1991-1996 Head Turtle Mother, Turtle Mothers Fort Pierce, FL 1993-1994 Environmental Control Hearing Board of Saint Lucie County 1995-2001 Party In The Park entertainment director Fort Pierce, FL 1999-2001 Art Walk performer with Hot Sauce Boys and B-Naturals Fort Pierce, FL 1998-2001 Fort Pierce Fanner's Market performer with Hot Sauce Boys and B-Naturals '- -.I \fOTING BALLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBUC PLACES ART AND D£.SI6.N COMMITTEE. EACH COMMLSSION£R S£IÆCTS ONE. C 1) Ramon Trias . Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak ~<Ull filléi' Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: """ ...., VOTING BALLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBUC PLACES ART AND DESIGN COMMITTEE EACH COMMISSIONER SEI.E.CTS ONE (1 ) Ramon Trias Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak William Pilkr Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: ¥ ..., VOTIN6 BALLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBUC PLACES ART AND DESIGN COMMITTEE EACH COMMISSION:E.R S:E.l.:E.CTS ONE. (1) Ramon Trias Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak. 'Willidll1 PillEr Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: ...... ...,; \fOTING BALLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBLIC PLAC£.S ART AND DESIGN COMMITTEE EACH COMMISSION£R S£lÆ.CTS ONE (1) Ramon Trias Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak Vlillid1l1 Paler - Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: ....... ..., VOTING BALLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBUC PLACES ART AND DESl6N COMMITTEE EACH COMMISSIONER S£LE.CTS ONE (1) Ramon Trias . Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak '\,.Vill¡£u~ ~ Piller I , Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: '"'" -' VOTING BAlLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ART AND DESIGN COMMITTEE MCR COMMLSSIONE.R SE.l.E.CTS ONE. (1) Ramon Trias Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak ~ll~£lll1rill,--~ . Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: '-" ...." VOTING BALLOT SUBJE.CT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ART AND DESI6.N COMMITTEE. EACH COMMISSIONER SillÆ.CTS ONE (I) Ramon Trias Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak W;¡lidlll P:Jler - Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: "'" 'WI VOTING. BALLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBUC PLACES ART AND DESIGN COMMITTEE EACH COMMISSIONER S£LE.CTS ONE (1) Ramon Trias Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak W~ll~d.1U P~llc:! , Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: '-' ...., VOTING. BALLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBUC PLACES ART AND DESIGN COMMITIE£ EACH COMMISSIONER S£IÆ.CTS ONE (1) Ramon Trias . Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak. V/~iYl~ "\ p;nAl!'r- Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: '"" ~ VOTING BALLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ART AND D£SI6.N COMMITTE.E EACH COMMISSIONER SEI.E.CTS ONE (t ) Ramon Trias Jon Ward , Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts , Patricia Pawlak / "íill~a1l1 filler- Patty McGee Robbin Lynch XXXXX Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: Commissioner Hutchinson '-' ...." VOTING BALLOT SUBJECT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ART AND DESIGN COMMITTEE £ACH COMMffiSlONERSELECTS ONE (1) Ramon Trias Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak ~ Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: ¥ ""'" '\lOTING BAliOT SUBJE.CT: ART IN PUBUC PLACES ART AND DESIGN COMMITTEE EACH COMMISSIONER S:El.£CTS ONE (1 ) Ramon Trias Jon Ward Dorothy "Dee Dee" Roberts Patricia Pawlak .willj7~ PiU@r Patty McGee Robbin Lynch Leland Carpenter COMMISSIONER'S SIGNATURE: '-" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM'¡(O. 7B DATE: April 10. 2001 REGULAR [X ) PUBLIC HEARING [ ) CONSENT [ ) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: Bi-Weekly Committee Reports BACKGROUND: At the April 11. 2000 Board of County Commissioners Meeting it was decided Þy the Board to place an item on the agenda. on a ÞI-weekly Þasis. to give the Board an opportunity to provide updates on the various Committees and Advisory Boards that they serve on. It has Þeen decided Þy the County Administrator that this item will Þe placed on the agenda on the 2'" and 4th Tuesday of each month. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: This meeting the Board will provide updates on the following Committees and Advisory Boards that they serve on: Committee Council on Aging Indian River Lagoon NEP Workforce Development Board Land Acquisition Selection Committee Law LiÞrary Board of Trustees Treasure Coast Community Alliance Treasure Coast Council of Local Gov. Value Adjustment Board MeetinG! Date Last Wednesday Quarterly as needed As needed Monthly As needed Monthly Monthly As needed Commissioner Lewis Coward Bruhn Ba rn es Bruhn Hutchinson Hutchinson Barnes/Bruhn/ Lewis Hutchinson Bruhn/Barnes Tourist Development Council Lake OkeechoÞee Coalition 10' Wednesday 2'" Monday [ ) APPROVED [] DENIED !() OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: 04/09/01 F7.ABWARR FUND 001 001117 001122 001124 001128 001130 001135 001229 001243 001252 001258 001259 001804 001809 101 101006 101211 102 102001 105 107 1 . '002 112 120 122 126 139 140 140001 140311 145813 145814 160 183 183001 183004 183212 184202 184203 184803 185001 186 186204 215 282 304 ..... ..,,; ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA WARRANT LIST #27- 31-MAR-2001 TO 06-APR-2001 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FTA 49 USC Sec 5307 98/99 CDBG--Wor1d of plastics FTA USC Section 5307 FY 99/00 Section 112/MPO/FHWA/P1anning FY01 TC Community Action Agency FYOO/01 Blind Creek Park Dune Crossover FBIP Boating Related Activities Chi1dern's Environ. Learning Center Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant TDC Planning Grant FYOO/01 Emergency Mgmt. Prep & Asst. FY 00/ SFWM/SLSWCD Well Monitoring Program SFWMD-F1oridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/Impact Fees FDEP Canal & Stormwater Retrofit Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Sur char River Park I Fund River Park II Fund The Grove Fund Indian River Estates Fund Southern Oak Estates Lighting Palm Grove Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund FDEP Industrial Park Wastewater IRL SWIM Impound Rest IX 2000-2001 Lagoon License Plate gran Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct ~dministrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court OSCA-Court Reporting Grant 00/01 Ft Pierce Inlet Mgmt Implementation Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration FIND-Ft pierce Inlet Hydrodynamic SHIP Housing Assistance FY 00/01 Recycling Operating Fund Recycling & Education Grant FYOO/01 5-Yr Bldg Bond Anticipat.I&S Fund Environmental Land I&S Fund Communication System Fund County Capital EXPENSES 361,861.35 66.56 58,771.96 66.53 1,262.03 241.76 859.98 28,742.40 135.00 520.64 299.39 635.08 757.40 326.34 156,545.30 1,287.58 115,156.40 22,648.20 1,847.86 777.85 198,592.34 6,963.35 2,593.03 518.15 153.71 866.22 111.12 666.37 7,860.26 270.60 6,163.75 304.25 2,160.00 2,161.62 1,933.98 822.41 1,188.06 4,878.00 12,336.40 16,220.88 9,252.30 666.84 3,147.25 163.68 957,990.00 270,505.00 2,755.94 9,850.56 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 625.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 04/09/01 FZABWARR FUND 382 401 401221 418 421 441 451 461 471 491 501 505 505001 510 611 625 674 676 "- ...." ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA WARRANT LIST #27- 31-MAR-2001 TO 06-APR-2001 FUND SUMMARY TITLE EXPENSES Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund Wast Tire Grant FYOO/01 Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund Holiday Pines Utilities Fund Building Code Fund Information Technology Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Service Garage Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library Driftwood Manor MSBU Fund King Orange MSBU Fund 1,535.10 454,288.84 1,596.00 18,111.37 54.76 4,455.17 10,813.92 23,539.84 562.11 7,002.04 49,335.96 241,260.86 11,430.77 25,348.97 11,906.51 68.22 2,760.34 15,000.00 GRAND TOTAL: 3,152,976.46 PAGE 2 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,156.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,782.17 '-' 04/09/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA ..., } u_'1D : 107 - Fine & Forfeiture Fund VOID LIST# 27- 31-MAR-2001 TO 06-APR-2001 F7.ABWARR CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00269953 12114102 Pickering, Keith C 12114105 12114108 12114110 12114112 12114113 12114115 12114127 12114130 12114131 12114132 12114133 12114134 12114135 12114136 12114137 CHECK TOTAL: FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 800.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 800.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 14,900.00 14,900.00 PAGE 1 '-' '-' 04/09/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA PAGE 2 F7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 27- 31-MAR-2001 TO 06-APR-2001 ru,'iD: 215 - 5-Yr B1dg Bond Anticipat.I&S Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00269986 12113952 The Bank of New York Trust Com 957,990.00 FUND TOTAL: 957,990.00 ...... ..." 04/09/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA FZABWARR VOID LIST# 27- 31-MAR-2001 TO 06-APR-2001 }, ~",D: 282 - Environmental Land I&S Fund PAGE 3 CHECK 00269986 INVOICE VENDOR 12113951 The Bank of New York Trust Com FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 270,505.00 270,505.00 ~ ~ 04/09/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA FZABWARR VOID LIST# 27- 31-MAR-2001 TO 06-APR-2001 ÞvdD: 441 - North Hutchinson Island Utilities CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00024839 12113953 The Bank of New York Trust Com 3,150.00 FUND TOTAL: 3,150.00 PAGE 4 -y \ '-' ""'" ITEM NO. Co 2 A DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR I ] PUBLIC HEARING I ] CONSENT IX] AGENDA REQUEST SUBMITTED BY: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT-ROAD & BRIDGE DIV. ~ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS . Scott Herring, As . Manager Road & Bridge Divis on SUBJECT: Approval of Interlocal Agreement between the City of Port St. Lucie and St. Lucie County for the use of portions of Tract H-15 for Drainage Purposes for Midway Road and Glades Cut-off Intersection Improvements. BACKGROUND: Staff has been working on intersection improvements for the intersection of Glades Cut-Off Road and Midway Road. As part of the intersection improvements, it is necessary to provide a drainage retention area on the east side of this intersection. St. Lucie County has already acquired three (3) residential lots for this purpose, and with the approval of this interlocal agreement, all the property will be in place for this retention pond. To date, the County has spent $275,805.00 on Design Costs, and $18,077.84 on Land Acquisition Costs. Additionally, The Reserve in accordance with their Development Order provided $144,152.28 to pay for the signalization of this intersection. FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Approval of Purchase of three Residential Parcels on 1/16/01,2/6/01 and 2/13/01 RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends that the Board approve the interlocal agreement as drafted by the County Attorney and Authorize the Chair to sign the Interlocal Agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED I ] OTHER: I ] DENIED [X]Counly Attorney X [X]Originating Dept. Public Works Coorclination/Slnnahlres ¿{~ [ JMgt. & Budget [X]Co. Eng~~ [ )Purchasing M [X]Road & Bridge [ ]Finance (check tor copy only. if appliceble) '- '-' INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE AND ST. LUCIE COUNTY (PORTION OF TRACT H-15 FOR DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM) THIS AGREEMENT (the" Agreement") is made and entered into this day of ,2001, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter the "County"), and the CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE, a Florida municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"). WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, the City is the owner of Tract H-15 located in Section 1, Township 36 South, Range 39 East; and, WHEREAS, the County has requested use of a portion of Tract H-15 for a drainage conveyance system; and, WHEREAS, the City and County agree that the conveyance of an easement for a portion of Tract H-15, (hereinafter referenced to as the "Real Property") and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit" A" would mutually benefit both parties. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. USE AND MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY. The City agrees to permit the County to use and maintain the Real Property upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement for drainage conveyance purposes related to the Glades Road and Midway Road intersection. Such use and maintenance shall.be undertaken in full conformity with all laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations and other governmental restrictions regulating, relating to, or imposing liability or standards of conduct for use of the Real Property. The County agrees to use the facilities only for the purpose intended according to the terms of this Agreement. g:\atty\agrumnt\interloc\PSL - Tract H-15 -1- ¥ ...., 2. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the 1st day of December, 2000 and shall continue until terminated in writing by both parties. 3. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITY. The City shall not be responsible during the term of this Agreement, including any extension, for any costs, damage, expense or outlay of any nature whatsoever arising from, or relating to, the Real Property; and the County shall pay all charges, impositions, fines, fees, levies, assessments, costs, and expenses of every nature and kind relating to the use of the Real Property by the County. (a) The County will not permit any construction lien or other lien be attached to the Real Property for work, labor, services, or materials related to County use of the Real Property. (b) The County shall be responsible for obtaining any and all approvals, permits, consents, licenses, authorizations, and notices from all governmental authorities exercising jurisdiction over the County's use of the Real Property. (c) The County shall submit the design plan of the drainage conveyance system to the City's Engineer and Public Works Director far approval prior to construction, to ensure that the design does not affect the City's drainage system, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 4. INDEMNIFICATION. The County agrees that it shall be liable to the extent allowed by Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, for any claim for damages or personal injury to persons or property arising from the negligence of the County or its agents, employees, contractors, or invitees relating to the occupancy, use, alteration, maintenance, or improvement of the Real Property by the County or its agents, employees, contractors, or invitees. To the extent allowed by law, the county further agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all liability, damage, expense, cost of action, suits, claims, demands, or judgments for injury to person or property of any and every nature arising out of the construction or alteration of any improvement on the Real Property or out of the use, management or control of the same. Such indemnification will not constitute a waiver of the County's sovereigh immunity protection. g:\atty\ogrumnt\inter]oc\PSL - Tract H·15 -2- '-' ,.." 5. NOTICES. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be given in writing as follows: As to the City: As to the County: Donald B. Cooper City Manager City Hall, Building A 121 SW Port St. Lucie Boulevard Port St. Lucie, Florida 34984-5099 Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 with a copy to: with a copy to: Roger G. Orr City Attorney City Hall, Building A 121 SW Port St. Lucie Boulevard Port St. Lucie, Florida 34984-5099 Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 6. CHOICE OF LAW. This Agreement and the rights of the parties shall be governed by, construed, or enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida and St. Lucie County. 7. EFFECTIVENESS. This Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court prior to its effectiveness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be signed in their respective names by the proper officials and under their official seals on the latest day and year noted below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman g:\atty\agreemnt\intuloc\PSL· Tract H-15 -3- " ¥ ATTEST: City Clerk g:\atty\ogrumnt\intuloc\PSL - Tract H-15 'wi APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA BY: Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: City Attorney -4- n ¥ 'wi . .. LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND lYING IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA, COMPRISING ALL OF lOTS 19, 20, 2. t, AND A PORTION OF TRACT "H-1S", OF BLOCK 3179 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF ·PORT ST.LUCIE SEC1l0N FORTY SEVEN" AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS 800K 15, PAGE ~O, OF THE PU8L1C RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; 8EGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 19, 8LOCK :3 179, OF THE PLAT OF "PORT ST.LUCIE SECTION F'ORTY SEVEN", THENCE NORTH ~5' 08' 00" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 19 A DISTANCE OF 275.00 FEET: THENCE NORTH 44'52'33" EAST A DISTANCE OF' 42.52 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH R!GHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT CANAL 1'10.103 (79.69 FEET WIDE); ·THENCE SOUTH 89'51 '08"EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 455.57 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 21, BLOCK 3179 OF SAID PLAT: THENCE SOUTH 31'37'53" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROLONGATION AND SAID EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 21 A DISTANCE OF 22S.1S FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE IN THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF REBA CIRCLE (50 FEET WIDE), 8EING CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST OF WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 31'37'S3"EAST, AS SHOWN ON SAID PLO.T, ALSO 8EING THE SQUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 21; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A DELTA OF 76'~6':35", AND RADIUS OF 130 FEEL A QISTANCE OF 174-.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 44'58'45"WEST CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF -WAY A DISTANCE OF 17.:3:3 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1.550 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, © 2000 LBF'H IMe. Ibt-h Ct:NSULTlHG CNlL ¡:HGIHE!~S. SURVEYORS k WAPPERS .. P=ri"l'\ll'2' F"" ¡,.nJb. INC. VAl,," Bv Dorivn:" .3$5Q S.W. CarpCM"'lllc iIIIVWwG'J. P~fft cay, F10ndD 3<4990 (:,a\) 2SI-Jða.3 r.", ($41) 2"-392$ epoq: II: npiE: Lic&f\,. No: !51 .......lbfh.c:am -rnIS IS NOT A SURVEY PROJECT NAME: MIJJWAY/GLADES CUTOFF EAST RETENTION PONJJ ST.LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Seale: 1 "- 80' Sheet 1 at 2 Comput.d: TEP Chee'ed: JAW REVISIONS:, . "eld Book: N/A "eld: NIA Pogo: N/A F'lU: NO. 95-0010502 Project No. 95-00\0 Octa 6/20/2000 Exhibit "A-i" ! . ~~5 ~t\ ..."''1 \i <:!.~'> ~~~'I' ;-f5> "'~ ~'" c. L_ SECTION t. TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANCE 39 EAST -- MIDWAY ROAD COUNTY RCUD 7/2 ~ .. z .. '" øi " NORTH ST,LUCIE RIVER '/YATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT CANAL #103 SOUTH RICHT -OF' -WAY LINE CANAL 110J _1 SCALE: 1"= 80' ..... N44'S2'33ðE 42.52' el"ARINr. ~ _S89"S1'08"E_ _ 455.57' TRACT "H-1S" TOTAL /\11.550 ACRESI 20 21 1: ,,~ DELTA= 76'46'35" 9'.5'0.3:0/ 19 RADIUS= 130.00' ~ó¿¡0, LENGTH= 174.20' SOUT"rlWES~Y ~ S44'S8'4fW LINE Lor t 9 17.3.3 \ ./ . \ 16 17 BLOCK 3179 / ~ 1H~UNE 01" THE NORTH ST.LUCiE RIVER WATER W.,",CE~ENT CANAL , 1 OJ is TAKEN TO 8EAA SS9'5"OS', ANO ALL OTHER 8EARiNCS ARE RELA'i1YE TriERETO. @) 2000 LBF'H Inc. PORT ST. LUCIE SECTION FORTY SEVEN '" BLOCK 3180 'fl-¡IS IS NOT A SURVEY PROJECT NAME: . MI.DWAY/CLADES CUTOFF EAST RETENTION POND ST,LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ibt-b CON5U~T1NG CNIL [NGIHEEiIS. 5UINOOflS " w...PPERS .. PaT'iN't'2 'ar b:nJ.b. IHC. Vc&I... I1v ~" 35.50 SOW. Corpot"l. Pa~. Palm Clly, F'toAda 34990 (,") 2114-3MJ r_ ('.'} 2"-312' . !PH " rap!!:: Uc:.c:nse "0: !J~SI .....Jblh.cam Scale: 1 11= 801 Sheet 1 01 2 Computed: TEP Checked: JAW REVISIONS; F;.ld Baal<: N/A Page: N/A Ool. I F1L.£ NO. 6/20/2000 9~-aO'OS02 F;el¿: No/A Project Na, 95-0010 '.'~ Exhibit "A-2" ~ """ AGENDA REQUEST ...,.¡ ITEM NO. C-2b DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] SUBMITTED BY: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT-ROAD & BRIDGE DIV P~~ P. M. Bowers, Manager Road & Bridge Division TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Approval to purchase a CAT 950F Wheel loader, EQ#O 1-155, for use in the Maintenance Operations Section from Equipment Senter, Inc. BACKGROUND: See the Attached Memorandum. The Maintenance Section of Road & Bridge has budgeted funds ($100,000.00) to purchase a used wheel loader. We have an attached quote for a 1998 CAT 950F Wheel loader with 5600 hours for $97,~,0.00. FUNDS AVAilABLE: 101-4110-564000-400 - Machinery & Equipment PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request to purchase a used Caterpillar 950F Wheel loader, EQ#01-155 in accordance with the St. Lucie County Purchasing Manual from Equipment Senter, Inc. for $97,250.00. [JI APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: !JJ [X]County Attorney f-¡J- [X]Originating Dept. Public Works W.r [X]Mgt & :~:;::n;;;/Si~~~'1 [ ]Co. Eng. e.-( [X]Purchasing_ _ _ [X]Road & 8ridgefC~ --- ( ]Finance (cI1eck for copy only. if applicable) · ¥ ""'" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Ruth Totten, Interim Purchasing Director P. M. Bowers, Road & Bridge Manager~ SUBJECT: Purchase of Used CAT 950F Wheel Loader DATE: March 29, 2001 The Road & Bridge Division has found a used wheel loader that can be bought for $97,250, a substantial savings over a new one. Per St. Lucie County Purchasing Manual, Section 5.5, Paragraph (a)(3) the Board of County Commissioners can waiver the requirement for formal sealed bids if used items are available which would result in a substantial savings over purchase of new items. This piece of equipment is a 1998 Caterpillar Model 950F Wheel Loader, SN 5SK03465, with approximately 5600 hours on it. The latest book on auction bid results, Volume 45, Semi-annually published, shows the last bids to be from $100,000 to $120,000.00 for a similar loader. Road & Bridge and Central Service Garage were able to investigate the past use of this loader. We were able to perform field tests and review before and after pictures of this piece of equipment. Staff recommends the Board approve the purchase of a used wheel loader to fill equipment request EQ#01-155. PMB/sb Attachments cc: Dewey W. Hudman, Project Supervisor APR-04-2001 11 :44 F'.01/ø2 E· S¥ qUlpment enter Inc. P.O.Box 911421 Longwood, Fl. 32791-7421 ECI -...I Bi\\T., St. Lucìe County 3071 Oleander Ave. Fort Pierce, FI. 34982 THISrSAQUOTATIONONLY I Date Dtseñ lflOJl Balaoce 03128/01 Inv. # 3602 II CAT 950F WHEEL LOADER SIN ~SK03465 , ,--- , EQUIPPED AS FOLLOWS, CAB, A/C, BUCKET, - \ $ 90,000.00 I I BEA GHT. TAIL LlUt11S , - - I ¡ PORKS S 3,000.00 90 DAY POWER TRAIN AND HYD. WARRANTY $ 1,000.00 RAKE $ 3.000.00 - - I I ! I ! .. : FOB Tampa Florida NO TAX I I I Total 7 .00 , ---j Is 9 ,000 .. " '-"' ~. -' 11' ~, ;~ ~ , ,>t {~ ~ ~ ~ í oð Q) ~ ~ ·S '" '" ~ I- 0 Q) ~ 0 t!: Q) 0 Q f2 Q ..!2 .Q .!!! Q "" " oS 0 .~ Q. C]) S - .Q ~ :.§ '" .èi' ... "" 0 ~ ( ) .S 1: ( ) ~ ~ '" ( ) .c: '" Q. E '" '" Q e <:) Q Q. ~ ( ) <:) ~ .c: ;¡, " 0 .... " Q) .c: '" .!!! C '" ~ " ~ -' Q. <:) ~ .9 Q) " ~ <:) ~ ¡:: " Q ~ ~ .c: ~ .12 E ~ 10 "" Q - Q oj 0 c ;:: ~ '" 0 " U) Q '" .!!1 ( ) ~ ~ .~ '5 - Q, E ~ a:: .... Ci) Ci) 0 "" '" '" ~ E , W T'" !;! !;! S Q) 32 - 8 ~ z c 0 .Q 0 '" <:) .!!1 Q ~ ~ 0 c ~ " '" ~ "'= 0 '" ( ) ~ ëñ c -5 '" §- .Q ~' ~;, "" '- '" U) c ( ) ~ ~ .~ '" Q. :æ: c Q, ~ N oS ..!. Q) ... ~ >" .c: ~ '" :æ: a:: if- ~ <;> '" ë¡; ~ ¡:.:~ '" ~ 0 <C Q ..!2 '" .S¿ Q 10 ói () W 2:;1'" .9 .c: ~ " we, .!? ~ '" .~ W ~ >- ë :;::c ~ t!: '" '5 ... m .J w Ww:- ( ) ~ .c: ( ) Q ~ :;: z <C c 0"' ~ " ã; ¡:: E '" ~ :::I () Z c(F .~ '" oS Q Q Z W ..J 0 oS I- 0 !a :;: II. ~ (,) ..!2 ....: ( ) W~ 0 - ¡:: Z () U. :;: " ... 0 ~ '" ~ 0::<' '" '" Q) u. a:: 0 3:' ¡;¡- ~ :ë¡o oS 0 0 0 0 ~ '" ...: 0 0 CO 0 W W '" .9 ~ .æ 0 0 C U. 0:: Z ¡ ~ e. .æ ~ c( a:: I- .!!1 '" '" [ .... <C U) ~ C]) '" :g 0 0 W '" .§ 5 .0 C]) aJ :::I <0 .c: '" ... ~ :§ a '" ..", .!!! ~ Q ~ >- 0) ;:: 0 e Ci) I- W ~ ... - ~ "" a:: ~ .~ .Q ~ Z - ~ '" " - ~ :::I I- '" '" ( ) " 0 Z Q '" E ( ) 0 ... .9 (,) " () W .!!! .~ .9- '" :æ: "" oS ~ '" ....: W e. " tr § '" a. ( ) '" .æ ~ '" Q 8 .c: () :::I '" ~ ,,' "" :::I a 6J (,) ~ u ~ 0 .J 10 ;; "'= c:; w 0 ~ ¡..: a co :::::... '" <:) 0) ~ ~ '" 0) (§ ~ ( ) U) '" ~ 1? " '" (o'j -J '" Q ... ~ lli Q) 0 g; E t!: .... LU 0 .9 0 .!!1 C]) e - - (!) '" '" Q, ~ "" ~ 8 Q) ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ .c: " 0 Q 0 t!: "" '" E '" " '" Ci) t!: a¡ I- .~ 0 '" .£1 - 1: ~ ~ -ê' .c: '" ~ ð ... ~ - Q ~ ~ Q E 10 "'= 8 ~ '" " 10 (,) <:) '" "5 Q. 0 .g Q ~ :::; a <0 Q Q ... ~ 0 , § (§ ~ C]) 0 ~ ( ) .!!! ~ .~ :g oj " .Q ~ <:) 10 ¡:: ~ ~ C Q.. t!:". 0) a¡ .", f.:' .9 LU 11'- ~ K ¡:;¡ ð >,., '~¡T- Z" ;,.;" ~.' Z W ¡:; -~1¡ 0;;' 0 0:: . Z ":i ¡:; :;:r ~ I- W Z c(! Z :;: žl~1 w I-~ 0 w Ii: oi, :;: w I ü: :;: c( Cñ f;h !!: C)]i?, ¡:: II. 'Oi ~ oj' :5 II. > "","" VI W a ~<" ~ a c ë w m ...., w \.; "'" AGENDA REQUEST ...." ITEM NO. C-2-C DATE: April 10, 2001 SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: 1~o».~-~ /Donald B. W4st, P.E. County Engineer -- TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Approve Change Order NO.1 in the amount of ($3,000.00); accept the project; release retainage in the amount of $4,545. 00 and make Final Payment in the amount $5,995.00 to Johnson-Davis, Inc. for Repair of Existing Control Wall, Midway Road at NSLRWCD Canal 90. BACKGROUND: On October 20, 1999 bids were opened for the repair the of existing control wall at Midway Road and NSLRWCD Canal 90. On January 4,2000, these bids were rejected because the allocated funds were exceeded. On February 4, 2000 the project was sent out for re-bid. The second opening for the repair of the existing control wall at Midway Road and NSLRWCD Canal 90 was held on March 1, 2000. On March 28, 2000, the Board awarded the contract to repair the existing control wall at Midway Road and NSLRWCD Canal 90 to Johnson-Davis, Inc. FUNDS AVAIL.: 101003-41131-563000-43026 Transportation Trust - Local Option - Culvert Replacement PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board awarded the construction contract to Johnson-Davis, Inc. on March 28, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve and authorize the Chairman to sign Change Order No. 1 in the amount of ($3,000.00); accept the project; release retainage in the amount of $4,545.00 and make Final Payment in the amount $5,995.00 to Johnson-Davis, Inc., resulting in a total contract of $46,900.00. [xl APPROVED [ ] OTHER [ ] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: CoordinationlSionatures ~ [x] Mg!. & Budget 'fI../J fYl/IYI [x] Project Man. ... II [x] Purchasing .Ié, ~ [x] Budget/Revenue Coord. . [x] County Attorney t~ [x] Originating Dept. Public Works [x] Finance Dept. ~~ , ¥ " ~ ";\f (ijf D wt . .\ ~\ ~ :î_))~~'=~" q I r¡ " ' : ~ ! '. .)AN - 2 2001 "I) "ll-' . !~." ! . ,~_",J 'UNTY, RrJëv "'~ - ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM 01-02 TO: Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney ,y;1- Don West, County Engineer {j)ð"" ¥ January 2, 2001 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Midway Rd. & NWLRWCD Canal 90 @ McCarty Rd. Control Wall Replacement On March 28, 2000, the Board awarded Johnson-Davis, Inc. a contract for the replacement of the above referenced control wall. Please approve the attached Release of Liens for correctness. If we can be of any assistance, please call Mike Harvey, Project Manager, at extension 1707. Bam Attachments cc: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director Mike Powley, Capital Projects Engineer Mike Harvey, Project Manager œ(~_l:~jœ ENGINEERING ~v-\o\ ~ \1' '-' ill NOV - 9 200J @I "" œ@œOWŒ CHANGE ORDER ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROJECT: Midway Rd. @ NSLRWCD C-90 Repair of Control Wall (name, address) CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 ENGINEEIl!'IG -.-- INITIATION DATE: 11/6/00 TO (Contractor): CONSULTANrs PROJECT NO.: N/A Johnson-Davis, Inc. 604 Hillbrath Dr. lantana, FL33462 ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: COO-03-288 CONTRACT DATE: 3/28/00 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A - Yes) SEE ATTACHED The original (Contract Sum) was ............................................................... $49,900.00 Net change by previous authorized Change orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $ -0- The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was ................................................ $49,900.00 The (Contract Sum) wili be (decreased) by this Change Order . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $ (3,000.00) The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be ........................................ $46,900.00 The Contract Time wili be (unchanged) by . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. (0) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is: 11/1/00 Funds Avaiiable: Account Number 101003-41131-563000-43026 The adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the Contractor for the work or changes defined in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order. the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments include the costs and deiays for all work contained in the Change Order. including costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non- affected work under this Contract. Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract price or time as a result of increases or decreases in costs and time of performance caused directiy and indirectly from the Change Order, subject to the current scope of the entire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor that the Change Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed. All work performed under this Change Order shall be performed in accordance with the contract specifications. Recommended: SI. Lucie County. Enaineerina Division Architect/Engineer 2300 Virainia Ave.. FI. Pierce. FL 34982 ~~/~ By' Ag"reed To: II-t. -o~ Date Approved: SI. Lucie Countv, Public Works SI. Lucie County Department 2300 Virainia Ave.. FI. Pierce. FL34982 Address By: Date Authorized SI. Lucie County: 2300 Virginia Ave.. FI. Pierce, FL 34982 Inc. Lantana FL 33462 By: Date :) Approved as to Form and Correctness County Attorney " ..J ..J ~ ..J o a::: I- z o u u. o a::: « c.. w a::: o en . U C! U ~ ..J (/' Z I- <I: C 0 <I: g o '" 0:::: UJ<Ô '>~ >-;~~ ~m. « 0::: 'Q.i fJ~ S:wõm i~l co ",0 è'Ji cuo.:t£] -== 0::: -g ~ i1.dfMt .::::O'uE:;:~;::;m}a: w e i- :W>::~~ o oa..-#(~~« .. z õ B ~ !ߥI..··· f';I ~<t~g;~q~t r;t 'õ':I: c;::":>'::::~$8 à:u8~~b1M~~ '¥' -' 8 g ~ "t o o § 8 ~ "! M "t 8 8 ~ .. 8 g ~ .. 'iij Õ I- o o on ...J on ...J IJ ." &B . s: = ~ a:: .".... .-'" . . z ~.2.s <Ii ~ " ~ ~ N o ~ " ~ ~ · ./ þ/ APPLIC~ON FOR ~ AND FINAL PA~NT Midway Road @ Canal 90 PROJECT NAME: ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO.: 0002 OWNER: CONTRACTOR: Tnnnann_ns:l'1.1i Q Tn... CONTRACT DATE: 3-28-00 APPLICATION DATE: 12-18-00 INITIAL CONTRACT AMT. BASED ON EST. QUANTITIES $ t.Q QOO 00 APPLICATION AMOUNT: FOR PERIOD ENDING: 0.00 12-18-00 TABULATION OF AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLIC.ATION AS APPLIED FOR BY CONTRACTOR 49,900.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT COMPLETED TO DATE (See Attached "Estimate of completed work") CHANGE ORDER NO, CHANGE ORDER NO. CHANGE ORDER NO. . CHANGE ORDER NO. $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL WORK TO. DATE (+) $ LESS PREVIOUS PAY. (-) $ SUB-TOTAL $ LESS FAILED LAB. TESTS (1.000.00) @ 100% @ @ @ % COMPLETE % COMPLETE % COMPLETE % COMPLETE (+) (+) (+) (+) 46,900.00 4U,~U;'.UU 5,995.00 PREVIOUS PAYMENTS: il $ 40,905.00 #2 $ 13 $ i4 $ TOTAL $ AMOUNT DUE FINAL PAYMENT, EXCEPT FOR ANY LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ASSESSED BY BOARD (-) AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER $ '"/'1. <loa. 00 . $ (-;....ODO~ $ $ $ $ l;/.b. <¡,OÒ o:rO $ ..¡~ "to,~ Qo $ 5."'0,,6. t:>D $ . $ s: '19S. 0 0 . CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that all obligations incurred by the Contractor under this Contract to date have been discharged in full; that no suits are pending in connection with the work und~l9~Beo~ontract; that th Contractor agrees to the total final price of $ ,. and final p nt of $ 5.995.00 as full settlement of his account under the Contract n of all claims in connection therewith. COUNTY OF Palm Beac STATE OF Florida / Before me t is, 18th day of December , X!'9:2000 , pe~ally appeared (;II , known to me, who being duly sworn, did depose and say that he is the s (Office) of the Contractor above mentioned; that he prepared attached application for payment and executed above affidavit on behalf of said Contractor; and that all of the statements contained therein are true, correct a d comple My commission expires: CONTRACTO BY TITLE ""øoi ~øn~ ublic TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA for payment by the Contractor has been reviewed hereby approves final payment under this , less liquidated damages PAYMENT SUB3ECT TO CONTRACTOR'S SIGNING ABOVE The attached application by the Engineer. The Engineer application in the amount of $ assessed by Board, ~CTUAL AFFIDAVIT. ~~ ~Nt;10~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: APPROVED BY Donald B. West, P.E.· 'Ray Wazny, P.i>. County Engineer Public Works Director Contract Time Began:. Substantial Completion on: Actual Construction Time: Contract Construction Time: . Rainy Days Allowance: Other Overrun Allowances: Net Overrun: Cal. Cal. Cal. Cal. Cal. Days CHECKED BY ~ ~:~: PREPARED BY <Ÿß -J-b/ Days St. Lucie cc:f1:ínty Eng D~~. Days _, ,...r.f"'J _. _ ,. II" ¥ ...., AGENDA REOUEST ITEM N ciJ-- ..3.B:.... DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Third Amendment to April 21, 1998 Contract Between St. Lucie County and Dawn G. Kirk, P.A. For Legal Representation ofIndigents for Dependency Cases BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Third Amendment to the April 21, 1998 Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign same upon obtaining all necessary signatures. [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: t6 Review and Approvals Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Oept. Sheriff: Other: Finance: ~ .. """ ..., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Katherine Mackenzie-Smith, Assistant County Attorney CA NO: 01-457 DATE: March 28, 2001 SUBJECT: Third Amendment to April 21, 1998 Contract Between St. Lucie County and Dawn G. Kirk, P.A. For Legal Representation of Indigents for Dependency Cases BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County entered into an Agreement on April 21, 1998 with Dawn G. Kirk, P.A., to provide legal representation for indigent persons in cases involving dependent children and termination of parental rights. Under the present terms of the Second Amendment, the Agreement expires on April 21, 2001. Attached is a letter from Ms. Kirk providing an update on the contract. Staff has not received any complaints conceming this Contract. The parties now desire to extend the term of the Agreement through and including April 21, 2002. RECOMMENDA nON/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Third Amendment to the April 21, 1998 Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign same upon obtaining all necessary signatures. Respectfully submitted, IH~ Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney KMS/mt Attachment ~ -' Law Office of ::bawn ç J0rkJ p...A. 217 Avenue A Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 (561) 468-2077 FAX (561) 468-2065 March 26, 200 I Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34948 RE: Contract Renewal To Provide Legal Representation in Dependency Cases Trial Level for Indigents in St. Lucie County Commissioners: My law firm, with the assistance of four other attorneys in private practice have been providing legal representation in Dependency and Termination of Parental Rights (TPR) cases for indigent parents in St. Lucie County for the past year under the terms of the Contract executed on April 21, 1998 and amended on April 20, 1999. We hereby request that the contract be extended as written for at least an additional one year period. As you may recall, prior to the inception of our contract, St. Lucie County paid private attorneys individually at a rate of $50.00 per hour for all Dependency and TPR cases. At that time Florida law required the appointment of counsel for indigent parents in only about 30% of the cases. Since 1998, however, every indigent parent in every Dependency and TPR case is entitled to court appointed counsel. Upon review of my files and vouchers, it is clear that the contract has been economically successful for St. Lucie County. Specifically, the County has realized the following benefits: 1. In the past year, approximately 350 attorney appointments were made for indigent parents under the contract. In the past, each of those would have been paid on an hourly basis for the life of the case. My records indicate that the current average "life" of a Dependency/TPR case in St. Lucie County is seventeen (17) months. However, it is not uncommon for TPR cases to be active three (3) years or more. The contract includes a finite billing plan for each case, thereby preventing long-term billing on one case. "- ....., Board of County Commissioners March 26,2001 Page -2- 2. While there are four billing phases to each case, most cases are resolved at Phase II. The data for cases assigned to my firm reflect the following breakdown of phase payments: A) Cases that ended with payment of Phase I (Total of$950.00 paid per case): 38% B) Cases that ended with payment of Phase II (Total of$I,950.00 paid per case): 54% C) Cases that ended with payment of Phase III (total of$2,750.00 paid per case): 8% D) Cases that were billed at Phase IV (total payment exceed $2,750.00 per case): 0% TOTAL 100% Before the contract was created, it was not unusual for hourly payments on a TPR case to exceed $4,000.00 plus costs. 3. The Phase payment method is not affected by the amount of time spent by each attorney on each case. Many of the cases have three or more parents and therefore attorneys involved. Each attorney attends the following on each case: numerous hearings, mediation and/or settlement conferences, administrative review meetings, reviews of the Department of Children and Family Services case plans and reports, correspondence, client conferences and calls, trial preparation, depositions and trial attendance. Dependency Court is held virtually every day of the week. We provide attorney appearances at all shelter and emergency hearings, often on a moment's notice. The Dependency arraignments, disposition and judicial review hearings are scheduled every other week. In those weeks, the attomeys will each spend approximately 25 hours in Court. 4. This firms submits one voucher each month to the County for payment. Under the former hourly billing system, approximately 40 Petitions and six vouchers were submitted for payment each month. The contract greatly reduces the County staffs time spent of these cases each month. Based on the foregoing, it is evident that St. Lucie County receives a measurable economic benefit from the terms of the dependency/termination contract. We all remain committed to provide quality legal representation to indigent parents as set forth in the contract. If you have any questions or if you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully Submitted, ~0~ DGK/tbh ....... ....., THIRD AMENDMENT TO APRIL 21, 1998 AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND DAWN G. KIRK, P.A. FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION OF INDIGENTS FOR DEPENDENCY CASES THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is dated this _ day of , 2001, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY" and, DAWN G. KIRK, P.A., hereinafter referred to as "ATTORNEY." WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Agreement (the "Agreement") wherein Attorney agreed to provide legal representation to indigents for dependency cases; and, WHEREAS, the parties now desire to extend the term of the Agreement, pursuant to paragraph 19 of the Agreement, up to and including April 21,2002. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree to amend the April 21, 1998 Agreement, as amended, as follows: 1. PARAGRAPH 19-is hereby amended to read as follows: PARAGRAPH 19- This Agreement shall take effect on the 21 51 day of April 2001, and continue until the 21st day of April 2002, provided that the Agreement has not been canceled as provided herein. This Agreement may be reuewable annually at the same or different contract price upon the consent of the contracting parties. This Agreement may be terminated by either party without cause at anytime upon thirty (30) days written notice. In the eveut of termination pursuant to this paragraph, Attorney shall complete each case assigned to them through final disposition ofthe case. Attorney shall be compensated for those cases pursuant to this Agreement. 2. Except as amended herein, the remaining terms and conditions of the April 21, 1998 Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. Page t of 2 ....... 'wi IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Attorney has affixed their name and seal the date aforesaid. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney WITNESSE: DAWN G. KIRK, P.A. BY: Dawn G. Kirk, Esquire Page 2 of 2 "-' ...." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-3B DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: St. Lucie County Landfill BACKGROUND: Florida Power & Light Company has requested a 10' Utility Easement to provide electricity to the new Solid Waste Bailing and Recycling Facility as shown on the attached photograph and Special Purpose Survey. Solid Waste has no objections to the proposed Easement. FUNDS AVAIL. : NIA PREVIOUS ACTION: May 23, 2000 - Board approved the award of Bid No. 00-035, Solid Waste Bailing and Recycling Facility, to the low bidder,_.J\.dams Robinson, in the amount of $8,281,000, to construct a Solid Waste Bailing and Recycling Facility at the Glades Road Landfill. October 13, 1998 - Board approved the design, permitting and bidding and service during construction for a Solid Waste Bailing and Recycling Facility at the Glades Road Landfill. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the 10' Utility Easement in favor of Florida Power & Light Company, authorize the Chairman to execute the Easement and instruct staff to record the Easement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. [x] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney' ~ [XX] [XX] Review and Aoorova~ I Public Works: ~ ./ [XX] Solid Waste: æ- [XX] Originating Dept.: ~ [ ] Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) Eft. 5/96 G:\ACQ\WP\JoAnn\Landfill\FPL Easement Agenda.wpd Work.Order No. 8509-07-441 '-" EASEMENT This Instrument Prepared By D D C a c D D c D a a ~ Sec.36 ,Twp 35 S, Rge 39 E Name: Co. Name: FPL Co. Address 3301 ORANGE AVE FORT PIERCE FLORIDA 34947 pg_ot Parcel 1.0. #_ (Maintained by County Appraiser) Form 3722 (Stocked) Rev. 7/94 a The undersigned, in consideration of the payment of $1.00 and other good ~ and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby D acknowledged, grant and give to Florida Power & Light Company, its a licensees, agents, successors, and assigns, an easement forever for the D construction, operation and maintenance of overhead and underground ~ electric utility facilities (including wires, poles, guys, cables, conduits and a appurtenant equipment) to be installed from time to time; with the right a to reconstruct, improve, add to, enlarge, change the voltage, as well as, the a size of and remove such facilities or any of them within an easement 10 S~~~............................................ feet in width described as follows: - :5.éÆ ßI/Æ1c!#ÞC' ':sv2¡/E)I By {/EtL!.ó/l! t2>lZoVjJ ....,- -L-/Y c!... Together with the ri~ht to permit any other person, firm or corporation to attach wires to any facilities hereunder and lay cable and conduit Wlthin the easement and to operate the same for co=unications purposes; the right of ingress and egress to said premises at all times; the right to clear the land and keep it cleared of all trees, undergrowth and other obstructions Wlthin the easement area; to trim and cut and keep trimmed and cut all dead, weak, leaning or dangerous trees or limbs outside of the easement area which might interfere with or fall upon the lines or systems of co=unications or power transmission or distribution; and further grants, to the fullest extent the undersigned has the power to grant, if at all, the rights hereinabove granted on the land heretofore described, over, along, under and across the roads, streets or highways adjoining or through said property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and sealed this instrument on Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ((;orporate's name) By (PresIdent's s¡g:nature) (Wrtness' Signature) Print Name (Witness) Print Name: Print Address: (WItness' '::hgnature) Attest: (Secretary's sIgnature) Print Name (Witness) Print Name: Print Address: (Corporate Seal) STATE OF before me this AND COUNTY OF day of . by respectively the President and Secretary of , a corporation, on behalf of said corporation, who are personally known to me or as identification, and who did (did not) take an oath. (Type of Identification) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged ,and have produced My Commission Expires: Notary Public, Signature Print Name f- Z W ~ w en « w -' oð a.. LL o W en o a.. o a::: a.. 1 ""'" AGENDA REQUEST .,¡ ITEM NO. C-4-A DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING Ruth Totton SUBJECT: Award of Bid #01-028 Hazardous Waste Disposal for Solid Waste Division to the low bidder Care Environmental. BACKGROUND: On February 21,2001 bids were opened for Hazardous Waste Disposal. One Hundred and Twenty nine vendors were notified, seventeen sets of bid documents were distributed and four bids were received. The low bid is from Care Environmental in the amount total of $8,665.. See Attachments FUNDS AVAil.: Funds are available in 401-3410-534000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: pulled 3/13/2001 " RECOMMENDATION: St Staff recommends award of bid #01-028 Disposal of Hazardous Waste to Care Environmental. In the amount of $8,665.(total wlset up cost) [ ~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: E: COMMISSION ACTION: County Attomey:X Originating Depl: X Finance: (Check for Copy only, ri Applicable) ./') , -r y¿ Coordination/Sianatures Mgl. &BUdget~ Other: Purchasing Mgr. X: Other: ,--- ¿; I ' /(- / Elf. 1/97 G:\COMMON\AG3~NDAS\BIDS\2001-028 award."Npd "-' ...., '" 7 ____fr£.-, ~ i¡ ,r -----/ .~ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SOLID WASTE DIVISION MEMORANDUM 01-121 "W"':'W~·'"V~("¿¡fn.u~i····:~'L'w··:···=:··~~·...t"'····:::¿·;O;"l'¡"-:-"«"ì'":""'¡';rn¡~~%~:~""~<~'>';';""'~'~'~"'''''''''~'>'¥t.~.~.m·..t;:(~·~;"'ì·;i¡n1'''·1~~~J~·'·'·'~·:~·~:.'''t;>.,~:·..."'~'~~I'yfnt~~ TO: Ruth Totton, Interim Purchasing Director Leo J. Cordeiro, Solid Waste Managee February 28,2001 FROM: DATE: RE: Award Bid #01-028 - Hazardous Waste Disposal for Solid Waste Division Please take the necessary steps to seek Board approval on March 27, 2001, to award Bid #01-028, Hazardous Waste Disposal for Public Works/Solid Waste Division, to the low bidder (with $0 set up cost), Care Environmental (attached you will find the tabulation of the four submittals). If you have any questions, or if I can be of further assistance, please call me at extension 1631. Thank you. . , LJC/am c: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director "-' (j) §3 .-' ~ - .-'.. -"" ::= -- - ;:-.- 1''''-' . . -- -." ::) ::iÆ - - - '.' ~ '......., '-' .,¡ Hazardous Waste Bid T abuJatiol1 (Based on Volmne of last Three Shed Clean-outs) Care Environmental 5 (solids) $100 8 $800 30 (solids) $205 14 $2870 55 (liquids) $185 27 $4995 Vermiculite Bags $0 38 $0 iber Drums 0 10 0 T otCIl $8,665 Total w/set. cost $8,665 , , .sm.etv I<Ieen Cos 5 (solids) $50 8 $400 $3300 30 (solids) $125 14 $1750 55 (liquids) $125 27 $3375 Vermiculite Bags $7 38 $266 Fiber Drums 2 10 2 0 Total $6,041 Total w/set. cost $9,341 ¥ ...., City E11Vironmef1tal C - -- - -5 (solids) $70 8 $560 $5550 30 (solids) $140 14 $1960 55 <1iquids) $175 27 $4725 Vermiadite Ba9s $8 38 $304 Fiber Dru s 10 2 0 Total $7,799 Total w/set 1.4 cost $13,349 Poß1Ation Control 5 (solids) $90 8 $720 $16,050 30 (solids) $180 14 $2520 55 <1i'11Aids) $225 27 $6075 . Vermic104lite Ba9s $15 38 $570 iber DnA s 2 10 2 0 Total $10,135 T ota] w/set cost $26,185 rn 0:: W Z o ¡¡; rnco -N :Eo :E' 0= CJ'II: ~e zll3 ~. 01- CJw u..w O::z: ern o::z <0 0- 113~ '-I ~ª Z<C ~I- Oe CJ- wll3 Õ ~ -I ¡..: en ~ en ~ e :J o en ~ Q. . ,:E w< CJo -0 :> .. 0::0 w.... en@ -I.... <0 eno ON Q. - ... .... ~N e> wO:: 1-< en~ <CO:: s:1I3 enW ~u.. 0.. CC !rW <z ~~ =0 ..J c ,...g c I..." 0 UJ 0 c !r z 0 ...¡ 1-2 0 £r ...¡ ...¡ zt- ¡: W N .... 02' ë 0... .... .... ~ Uo 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 zt- 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Q Q C C C 0 0 U Q =:) iii iii ...¡ ...¡ ItS ...¡ iii iii ¿ oj¡Ê UJ ¿ Z N .... .... N N .... c:: ¡:::; II) ~ ~ ~ .... .... ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ::;)::! CO? Q Q 0 ..J:;; II) Q Q 0 ~ ¿ ...¡ ,..: ..J ~I 0 CO? co Q. .... .... ~ c UJ .-' 2 Q Q z.... 0 Q Q 0< ¡: c:i &ri c::a.. ë Q N 00 5:;; 2 Q tit tit Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 0 ¿ Q Q Q Q z~ U c:i ¿ II) Q Q &ri IQ Q U U U IQ - N N a:i N ...¡ ...¡ - - W - UJ 00 Z ... CO? ... N Z Z ~æ c:: ... tit ... ... tit tit tit ... tit ... tit _u Q Q U5 Q Q ..Ja:: ~I c:i c:i enw .., Q ... ::;)en .... .... c UJ Q Q Q Z 2 Q Q W-' 0 Q c:i ¿ ¡: c:i w.... ë Q N Q CO? ..J . ... 2 Q tit Q ... Q Q Q Q Q 0 Q :ll::š: 0 c:i S¿ ... Q S¿ S¿ Q Q Q Q 0 Q Q ~E u Q z c:i z z ro..: ro..: N ¿ ...¡ ...¡ c:i UJ ... ... ... N ... ..,. wC:: c:: ... .... tit tit tit tit ... ... .... LL<C ... <l:1C Q (J 0 ~I ~ ~ ¿ ..,. z z , ... a: c:: 0-, u.... Zw c::LI.I S¿ U S¿ S¿ u u u u S¿ U S¿ S¿ S¿ u S¿ -:;; - - - - - - - :>:;; z z z z z z z z z, z z z z z z z¡¡¡ W!!J w~ c:: <I: U - - z (J 0 CI z en z 0 CI -I :J ..J -I C ..J ~ < ãi W <I: 0:: CI CI III W ~ w :5 CI :; z W (J 0 In ~ ::::¡ :> l- I') U ¡: !:! - Q. æ (J Oil 00 0:: CI ..J ::¡¡; é2 z - Q ::¡¡; U 0 Q. 0 I- ::¡¡; :II:: ~ ~ L5 ::::¡ <I: ¡!? III ~ Oil ¡: (J ::;) U -I 0:: ::;) III Oil 0:: ~ W êt <I: e 0:: 5:1 æ Q l- I- é2 LL c:: 0 W (J 0:: W Z (J Z c c:: c.. c.. ~ ~ :;; C :II:: CI ..J 0 W c:: , (J W -I æ c.. <I: :r w <I: W 0 0 W ..J <I: Z III ~ :r u :; .... :> IQ .... Õ ¡r: ¡¡ 0 ... 0 .., ... c.. c.. :> CI (J - - ~ ~ en CIJ ~ ~ ... .... o - !.!..i :~ II) W c:: I- W II) Z ~ º II) e II)=..J ¡NO :¡¡¡9~ 0....;: oic.. ~e' Z!IlW :J.~ 0l-æ: °WW LLWII) O:C..J 011)< C::ZII) 0<00 -c.. !III-II) <- ...JO ~æ~ Z~II) :Jr-<t 00;: Offill) W :J - 0 g 0 ..J c:: ¡¡; ~ :c ..J o c:: 1-2 Zr- OZ' Uo Zr- O~ ¡::::¡ :J= ...J:Õ ..J o c.. '* * '* * '* * -' 2"" O<i C::Q. ~~ 8 g 8 8 w-cio..;..; >[ß ..... ;! ~ ~ !::u ~ ~ .. ~ US; ..JC= (/ w :J(/ Z w-, W.... ..J. ~::: '0 ~r- WC:: LL~ « (/ c: c= 0-, u.... 2W'0 o~ ~ !:!::õ 0 > - .... ZZ¡ ~ WS2 W c= « U o ã5 w U c:: c.. cð I- (/ o U o ceo o C C C o ..; 0 ci It) N It) 0 ... ... N ~ .... ~ .. ..J « C) It) , (/ o ::¡ o (/ ~ ..J :J !II , - ::::: en ¡:: ceo C C C ..; ..; ..; C co co N N .... .... .. ~ ...J < o C M ...J < o It) It) ...J < C) It) co ....1 o o o ..... ~ o o ..; N .. o o ci o .... .. ..J « C) It) . en o :5 a ::¡ ~ ..J :J !II o o o ~ ... ~ o o o o ... .. o o ..; ... .... .. ..J « C) o .... o o ..; N ... .. * o o ..; ..... ... ~ '* '* '* CeO 0 coo 0 ..; 0 ..; 0 Ø) ..... cø 0 ... ... N .. .... ~ ~ . . ..J « o It) co o 0 0 0 coo C o ..; 0 ci It) ..... It) It) ... ... N ~ .. .. .... o o ..; = ... .. C 0 C 0 ceo C ..; 0 0 ci co C It) It) N """" N M ~ ~ .. .... ...J < o It) ..J « o o .... ..J < C) It) It) , en w o 13 ¡: (/ w c.. Q ~ < Z c:: o ...J U * ..J < o an an * o 0 o .0 o 0 ... It) ~ ~ 000 000 00"; It) cø N N ... .. .... ~ o o o It) ~ ~ ..J « C) an = '* * *' o o ci o ... ~ ..J « C) an , !II S o W ~ ::¡; ...." o o ..; ... ... ~ o o ..; ..... ... ~ ..J « C) o .... C C C C o ..; It) ..... ... ... .... ~ C C o ~ C Z N tit C C C 0 o 0 N N N .... tit ~ ...J ...J < < o 0 It) It) It) co *' o 0 o Q <ti <ti ~ .. o Q ,¿ N .... w en « U > !II W (/ « U o o ci ... ... Q ..J :J o c.. W Z o , (/ W > ¡¡; o ..J c.. X W o Q ci N ... w (/ « U > !II W (/ « U Q Q ci ... tit Q Z :J o c.. W Z o , w > ¡: ¡¡; Z W (/ ~ U o .,.. ¡¡¡ Q Q o 0 N N ~ .... o C! It) ... .... Q Q o N .... o o ci ... .... o Q ci ... .... Q Q o ... .... Q Q o ... .... Q Z :J o c.. W Z o o Z :J o c.. W Z o . , (/ W > ¡:: U « w c:: w Z ¡:: :J o c= , Z o Z ~ LL o N W t::) - .:-- UJ '" I- It: '" ~ ~ ~ e ",=-1 is£ :¡¡~¡ Sill. ~e' zCIJ~ ::1,- Ol-~ UUJUJ "'UJ", OJ:-I 0"'< It:Z'" <00 o¡::a. CIJ<~ '-10 ~::IUJ z~1- ::11-'" OO~ uãi", ~ ::I U 0 ::I 0 -I It: ~ ~ '" < J: '" '" - ö' C I<J ¡¡: ¡:: o z rn I<J Z < ... :¡ o u u.. o a:: I<J c:¡ :¡ ::> z ... - ö' C I<J ... ::> c:¡ æ ... rn is rn ... z w :¡ ::> u o c c ãj u.. o a:: I<J c:¡ ::¡; ::> 2: .. ë w > jjj U I<J a:: rn c ¡¡¡ u.. o a:: I<J c:¡ :¡ ::> 2: ..... :¡ o u a: ;: rn c z < :;¡ I<J C a:: w ... .. õ .. w C!) c: . "'WI , . c ~ .. g õi ¡¡¡ w -' ¡¡: >- ;; ö ,..,-" ¥ AGENDA REQUEST ~ ITEM NO. C-4-B DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING PRESENTED BY: Ruth Totton SUBJECT: Award of Bid #01-041 Moving Services for St. Lucie County BACKGROUND: On March 28, 2001 bids were opened for Moving Services. Forty-one vendors were notified, eight sets of bid documents were distributed and two bids were received. Both bidders are local companies. See Attachments FUNDS AVAil.: 534000 from various departments as needed PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of bid #01-041 Moving Services to the two bidders; Arnoff Moving and Hendershot Moving. (Cost to be determined as needs are determined.) COMMISSION ACTION: [xJ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Mgt. & Budget: Originating Dept: Other: Purchasing Mgr.:X Other: /! ---- j(.7' Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) EIf.119? G:\COMMON\AGENDAS\BIDS\2001-041 award.wpd , ~ ~ rn.... c::::'IIt wC? z.... oi tño >rn- --aI z:E, ::J:EI- OOW uUW ::E: !:!:!~rn uzz ::J::JO ...JO- . U l- I- « rnLL...J O::J oal c::::~ «0 0_ alai .... C C N ~ co rnN rnW::E: UJUu U-c:::: ->« >0::..., C::::UJ..:: wrn rn ...J ., C)«O zO::W -I-Z >ZW Owc.. :Euo "'" ....,; :i!! a.: C C N að C) CCCC CCC Z CCCC CCC :> ...J dooo eee LL "ItNCCO CO"ltc o ~ NM"It'llt "Itcøco :Ew~ fA- fA- fA- fA- fA- fA- fA- LLC)C:::: LL«W Oc::::- Zoc.. C::::I-¡": «rnLL I- 0 ::E: . rn c:::: CCCC CCC W ...J CCCC CCC 0 . LL eee&ri eee Z 0 - IOCION CCC WU~ NMM'IIt "It 10.... ::E:C)c:::: ~fA-fA-fA- fA- fA- fA- ZZW 0-- rn>c.. «O¡..: .,:ELL ZZZZ ZZZ ~~~~ rn««« c::::»> rn................ ::J............ ~aðaðaðað ~aðaðað OZZZZ coZZZ ::E:WWWW ,WWW 'IIt:E:E:¡¡¡:¡¡¡ >:¡¡¡:¡¡¡:¡¡¡ ,NM"It1O «NM"It > 0 « ...J 0 ...J - ~ ::J LL @ - co '" .... " c W to- => £c ô' ë2 c to- w rn ¡¡: ë f= ~ ë 0 z z w rn w > :;: w :;: ¡¡¡ 0 z => (J (J <C (J w ci 0 IX ... c ;:: :;: rn 0 c c rn (J 2ë 2ë c z "- "- "- <C 0 0 0 :;: IX IX IX w w w w C Q £c £c £c IX ~ ~ :;: :;: :;: w . => => => ... ~ z z z . Q ~ w =' ~ ! ö I ¥ .,¡ AGENDA REQUEST C-S-A DATE: April 10,2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department William R. B1azak SUBJECT: permission to purchase a pump for the South Hutchinson Island wastewater treatment facility from a sole_source vendor in the amount of $ 3,275.00 and approval of Equipment Request #EQ01-245 and Budget Amendment #BA01-135 FUNDS AVAIL: 451-3510-564000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: BOCC approved the sole source vendor during the construction of the South Hutchinson Island facility in October of 1995. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the purchase of a lift station pump from a sole source vendor, Flygt, in the amount of $ 3, 275.00 and approve #EQ01-245 and #BA01-135. COMMISSION ACTION: [x] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED CE: County Attorney:X j¡ coordination/Sianature~ Mgt. & Budget: ~ ~ Anderson ty Administrator ----- ,¿ / . Purchasing : )( Other: if applicable)____ Other: Eff. 5/96 < ~ ...., BOARD OF COUNTY CO.¡\¡V'AJ5510NERS UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILLIAM ßLAZAK DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Board of County Commissioners ,', -tl/! William Blazak, Utility Director Ufl;~'?J' April 10, 2001 RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT - LIIT STATION PUMP DATE: RE: BACKGROUND: When the South Hutchinson Island Wastewater Treatment facility was constructed specific lift station pumps were included as part of the advertisement for bids for the project. The lift station pumps were specified to provide long term reliability and service to the system. The specified pumps are performing as designed but as the system ages it is necessary to remove pumps for service and repairs and replacement pumps are needed. Purchase of this like pumps for the system will provide for two necessary functions required in any utility operation. First of all the replacement pump will provide the ability to remove an existing pump for refurbishment and second it will provide for a spare pump that can be utilized within the system to allow for repairs of other pumps. Spare pumps for a utility system the size of South Hutchinson Island provides for reliability and assurance of service to our customers. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the sole source purchase of the Flygt pump in the amount of $ 3,275.00 and approve the equipment request and budget amendment to permit purchase. JOHN D. ßRUHN. District No.1· DOUG COWARD. District NO.2· PAULA A. LEWIS. District No..3 . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No.4. CLIFF ßARNE5. District NO.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue . Fort Pierce, FL 34982 . Phone (561) 462-1150 . FAX (561) 462-1153 ""'" .,¡ @ Ci:J S; lJ.J a:: ~ .~ ~ .... 0 £ "" '" c 0 Jg <: c l': "" . .... ~ c c <: ';;: c ~ e ;g Q, It) lJ.J - .:, (,) ~ '. - I/) i It) 0:: ~ "" Ci:J , w..... !;:! - Zo '" It) Q, .... 00 l': -~ 1/)0 '" 1/)0 ~ -0 .~ ::iN ::io:: ¡:.: '" 0< z ~,,;, c¿ UW..... w "" W '"0:':::::: ~>s:! ë :IE c: C,) III .JO W W '"~ :IE z<:!:; c u Q - ;:) :lU'" z ë S .S:! c:: z w c: Q 01/)0 :IE w 11. Q e: t- Ur¡:.. > w ,,~ z :IE 0 a:: ;:) u..o::~ 0 a:: ~ .Q~ 0 00< u 11. " '- U W 11. W ~.s U Ou..O a:: <C ~ ~ 0::1-< '" ~ <1/)0 Q,Q "'- OWZ .5 ~ a¡:lW ~~ ~OC) ~~ W< Q c: zO:: .c:..!!! :II- -.22 OZ ~ t: UW o !iJ W::i e: .S _11. l':-¡:¡ U- .9'5 :1:1 ~ £:I: .JO ::::¡.(: .W ~ "''5 I- '" 0 I/) Q CI) <: :SQ 0 Q :S i :s2...... :s 0 e ~ Q,Q ~ "=e: ::;¡ "§ .9 fß J:: Q," It) ¡:: e: ¡¡ .... ¡:: (\ Cl. ~ '" Q , - Q,.c: - ;:::! ::;¡ ~ (\ c .... 0 ¡;t Q - fñ ::;¡ Ci:J Cl. ~~ ¡:.: :it z a ¡:.: ;:) z w 0 0 a:: z ¡:.: :IE ~ t- W z <C z :IE z W t- U W Ii¡ 0 :IE w ¡¡: :IE <C ¡¡; 11. C) ¡:: 11. 11. :> :; c VJ :; w a ;:) I::! a c Õ W III W BUVT AMENDMENT REQUEST FORN"., REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMB for Utilities PREPARED DATE: 04/03/01 AGENDA DATE: 04/10/01 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT TO: 451-3510-564000-300 Machinerv & Eauioment $3.275 PortablelEmerqency pump for S. Hutchinson Island Utility System . FROM: 451-9910-599300-800 Reserves . $3,275 , REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Purchase portable pump for system. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: N/A THIS AMENDMENT: N/A REMAINING BALANCE: N/A , DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: (tlí>tWJ y , ,1/, - - IJ Úf) OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 01-135 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: 83i14/28al 14: 09 55184812'3'3 EKPHELPS ,IPB PAGE 0~ '-' """ M.~~~.~~~T,JRE" Õ ~(r~~;:2,>¡l.1.Tlvt Ow:.~¡,~ .1.,\11) W,,~T~ WÞo;E~ TR~J.T~~NT ;al.: ~1.~~N7 PROPOSAL IO.; ST LUCIE COUNTY UTILITIES-WAYNE DAYlS SUBJECT: FLYGT PUMP March 14, 2001 We are pleased to offer the following equipment ONE (1) ~3102/267 3hp 1ph 230v Flygt Submersible Pump with 40' of Motor Cable ..ð "/·»t ~"- ' PRICE: $3,275.00 plus taxes,FOB factory,with freight allowable to jobslte THIS PROPOSAL WILL EXPIRE IN THIRTY (30) DAYS UNLESS EXTENDED IN WRITING BY ELLIS K. PHELPS & COMPANY. NOTE: WE DO NOT SUPPLY PIPING, VALVES, GUIDE BARS, PRESSURE GUAGES OR SPARE PARTS EXCEPT AS INDICATED ABOVE_ TERMS: SUBJECT TO CREDIT APPROVAL NET 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF INVOICE OR 100% PAYABLE BEFORE START·UP OF EQUIPMENT(WHICH[VER COMES FIRST.) A SERVICE CHARGE OF 1.5% PER MONTH WILL BE ADDED TO ALL BALANCES UNPAID 30 DAYS AFTER INVOICE DATE. FAILURE TO PAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE TERMS WILL VOID ALL WARRANTIES. CONDITIONS :1) Price is firm based on our receiving complete approval and release for production four (4) weeks after drawings have been submitted by Ellis K. Phelps & Company 2) PARTIAL BILLING WILL BE MADE ON ANY PARTIAL SHIPMENT. We thank you for your interest in our equipment and look forward to being of service to you In the near future. . A SIGNED FACSIMILE COPY OF THIS PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTABLE AS A BINDING CONTRACT. J'ZCOMPANY STEVE KISS C/ DATE: 3-/,,/-&/ 1"~ - /'1:;/ 1 <-' .;IL '~30 10" STAEET WEsr . ~IVIEFlA BEQ"Ç'-i. ~~O~ICA 3340~· r;t\1·S4e·120C . UX 56i·949·1HQ APOF'k~ 0 Fi MlERS 0 RI\"rERtI eEACU 0 SAVANNAH · . JU;:¡lJNCATION _ ~ ¥ FOR - SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT (.0 Based upon the Pur"h""'"'g Manna], the proposed procurement descnèed below is being procured pursuant to the g.tiñelines on Sote Source Procurement. A good faith review of avai1ab1e sources bas been made and there is only one source for the requn-ed supp1y, service, or construction item. L Propose to procure / - .--l "/ilP?,/coZ.. /.:;,/, 7 - q1?' '""~ ç f..( -// 1/ . 7'/ ~/;:j / .:/ ~? .r:(~. it:- ./ -"C "fJ? / ~ .', .-7/ ~VJ /,<..... 5<y4 ,"7/'¡,-,¿ .¡' 0(~ ,,~/. (~~4¿Á "I :J.. ."",:'¿"- j ,~. /..// Requisition # 2 As a sole source procurement from: E /~> -t" ;11"(,, i.r v ~ 17]" Ið ::i¢/" ¡i- Û;;J'~j(Ú", '- ;([/1('( ;fL 1.J'~V 3. The 'Basis for this sole source'detemrlnation and the reason no other vendor is suitabte is: /'4:,1' /.J" ¡}r '7;;'~; /.:.4~. /lJ/1.v' Ei' //i'C ¿,/L /-;,,/*;1 ///¿$ ?i,v,ë ?£Z ;;,~- /;.. d "'7 .4N ~','7.4'/.e v/,/¿t{/" ,/ £//,'-/" £ o ,J' - ,-;,:)- pi Date /I /;.~ ·J:;-v Dep~~\ en~u~ _J \:ruJ rft\ ' Authörlzed Signa~e ~"¿c-'/'!-/ ....-- Title NOTE: L Enter d=Dplica of ¡aœs or serviœs 10 be proc:œed. 2. Enter II3IIIe alsolc IODrœ _.......... 3. Enter the cfeo_i_..... l11li bosis!orlOle """"" pro............L 4. Anach IOIe saura: Idler from _ l11li cIepanmcDL 5. Pmpaoalfrom w:udar _ priciDg. Ç1Approved ( )DiSapproved Î /1 I ~_ {''I 1/2Æ \~~¿{;'-:¡-O \.J Purchasing Director .' / / 7'/(/.3/ ¡J / Date 03/21/01 16:28 F~~ 407 880 2962 EK PHELPS ORL~'~O 1·~·C.J..c:.tJl::n. ~;.d!1t-'M IfT FLYGT GA PUMP . 1410021002 tIO.978 P.2/2 '- ...,.¡ An ITT 'nduslrl.s company 11'7' Flygt ':'mpo1'ation 90 Hor/Zo1 £,.IY. $uwQllee, GA 90024 Tøf.phone: (770) 932-4320 Fr:¡x (770) 932-4321 Marcl12l, 2001 St. Lucie Co1lllty Utilities Suhject: Flygt Products· Sales & Service Ple¡¡se be advísed that Ellis K. Phelps &: Company is the only authorized vendor for *Flygt Products and SA.s is the only IILIthorized service fep¡¡ir IIIId wlUTanty Org¡mizatio~ in the State of Florida (E1IBt of the Apalachicola River). Their Staff is properly trained to prov.de you the best service available. Thank you for your interest in Flygt Products and do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions reglU'ding clistribution or any otber matter, Very truly yours, ITT FLYGT CORPORATION ~ 10hn D. Ad~ Southeast Regional Mllllager cc: Dick Cole - E. K. Phelps & Co. *Flygt PrpduçU include SubllUll'8ible pumps, mbœrs, valves. and MuJti~ode probe!, controlt I!ßd well wlIsher. 1 '-' ..." AGENDA REQUEST C - 5 - B DATE: April 10,2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] " CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department William R. B1azak SUBJECT: permission to advertise for bids for the North Hutchinson Island P.V. Martins Water, Reuse and Force. Main Extension. This project will be a renewal and replacement project for the North Hutchinson Island Utility District with an engineer's cost estimate of $279,290. FUNDS AVAIL: funds will be made available from 44~-9910-599300-800 to 448-3600-563000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends permission to advertise for bids for the North Hutchinson Island P.V. Martins Water, Reuse and Force Main Extension at an approximate project cost of $279,290. [ X ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED derson Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney:X Coordination/SiQnatures . Mgt. . BUdget'x.r:ðJJ 11l¡n~ Purchasing Originating Dept: X Finance Director: ( Other: if applicable)____ Other: Eff. 5/96 , ¥ ..., BOARD OF COUNTY COMM!SS¡ONfRS UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WilLIAM ßlAZAK DIREOOR MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners 11.1.-1/ William Blazak, Utility Director \}jI)ft? FROM: DATE: April 10, 2001 RE: RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT - PV Martins Water, Reuse & Force Main Extension BACKGROUND: This project will include the replacement of water, reuse and force main lines in the North area of the North Hutchinson Island Utility District. Project engineers, LBF&H have completed the design and are preparing the bid documents and contract. The project will replace existing lines and increase the line size to provide reliability of service as customer base increases. The engineer's cost estimate of the project is $279,290 and will be expended from reserves under the North Hutchinson Island Renewal and Replacement program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board grant permission to advertise the bid for the PV Martins Water, Reuse and Force Main Extension in the North Hutchinson Island Utility District. JOHN D. GRUHN, DistricT NO.1· DOUG COWAr.D, District No.2· PAULA A. LEWIS, District No.,J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, DistricT NO.4. CLIFF ßAf1.NES. District NO.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue . Fart Pierce. Fl34982 . Phone (561) 462-1150 . FAX (561) 462-1153 H~~-~~-¿~~l IJ=¿l LJ::: "'H I""'HLI'] L J r rL ~Dl ¿OO ~~~~ ~.~¿/~~ ~ I2fIt St. Lucie County ¥V. Martins Water, Reuse, & For£e Mvxt;msion Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate April 3, 2001 ~'fæ?~~' . I ,:,;:~f:j:::,;~,~;. , ,.r,-,,:'¡:t.1 ~£~~::-_ o. I Mobilization I LS $15,800 $15,800 ConstrUCtion Surveying/ 2 Record DrawinJ!:s I LS $9.000 $9,000 3 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $4,500 $4,500 4A 12" PVC WM 1100 LF $25 $27,500 4B 12" DIP WM 710 LF $45 $32,000 4C 6" PVC WM 60 LF $18 $1,100 SA 6" PVC PM 2385 LF " $18 $43,000 5B 4" PVC PM IS LF $14 $300 6 8" pve REUSE 260 LF $20 $5,200 7A 12" Gate Valve 3 EA $2.650 $8,000 7B 8" Gate Valve 2 EA $1,700 $3.400 7C 6" Gate Valve 4 EA $600 $2,400 7D 6" Plug Valve 3 EA $1,200 $3,60(} 7E 4" Plug Valve 2 EA $600 $1,200 7F 6" Automatic ARV 1 EA $2,500 $2,500 70 12" Automatic ARV 1 EA $4,500 $4,500 7H 2" Terminal Blowoff w/Box , I EA $750 $800 71 4" to 12" DIP Fittings 17 TON $10,600 $18,100 Furnish and InstaU 8" Gravity 8 Sewer 10 LF $20 $200 9 Manhole 1 EA $1,600 $1,60(} 10 Directional Drill I LS $16.000 $16;000 11 Fire Hydrant Assemb ly I EA $2,200 $2,200 Connect Existing Fire 12 Hydrants 2 EA $1,000 $2.000 Connect ExislÏng Water 13 Services 4 EA $1,000 $4.000 14 Abandon 6" Water Main I LS $750 $800 15 Sample Point 2 EA $300 $600 Modifications to SLC Lift 16 Station 1 LS $3.000 $3,000 Connect Existing Private Lift 17 Slation I EA $500 $500 18 Abandon 4" Force Main 1 LS $500 $500 Asphalt Roadway Removal 19A and Replacement 880 SY $20 $17,600 Concrete Sidewalk Removal 19B and Replacement 200 SY $35 $7,000 20 Surface Restoration I LS $15,000.00 $15,000 SUBTOTAL $253,900 $25,390 $279,290 TOTAL P. 02 10% Contingoncy GRAND TOTAL '- '"-' ...., St. Lucie County INTERNA"ONAL AIR. .. . on F!orTcfä's Treasure Coast AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-6-A DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [ j PUBLIC HEARING [ j CONSENT [X j PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Airnort Paul PhilliDs SUBJECT: A ward the base construction bid and alternate bid to The Signal Group Inc. in the amount of $539,174.76 for the base bid and $110,280.00 for the alternate bid for a total project cost of $649,454.76 for the Airfield Signage Rehabilitation Project at St. Lucie County International Airport. BACKGROUND: In March 2000, the Board approved the funding request for the airfield signage rehabilitation project to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Due to the safety component of this project, both the FAA and FDOT made funds available. In September 2000, the construction bids for the this project were opened. The engineer, the FAA, and FDOT have reviewed the bids and recommend that the project be awarded to the low bidder The Signal Group Inc. FUNDS AVAILABLE IN ACCT#: Funds are availabk in Airport Airfield Signage Account. (140121-4220-563000-46012) (140310-4220-563000.4612)(140309-4210_563000-400) PREVIOUS ACTION: In March 2000, the Board approved the funding request to the FAA and FDOT. In September 2000, the Board approved the professional services proposal with Williams Hatfield & Stoner and accepted the FAA funding. RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends that the Board of County Commissioners award the base construction bid and alternate bid to The Signal Group Inc. in the amount of$539,174.76 for the base bid and $110,280.00 for the alternate bid for a total project cost of$649,454. 76 for the Airfield Signage Rehabilitation Project at St. Lucie County International Airport. COMMISSION ACTION: "jAPPROVED [ JDENIED [ JOTHER: CONCU Reviews & Annrovals ,'¡JIIt Mrrf'4 County Attorney:- ~ OMB ~urchasing Originating Dept: ' Other:, . Other: Finance:(Check f;1l¡ py only, if applicable) "- ~ St. Lucie County INTERNATIONAL AIR on Horida's Treasure Coast STAFF REPORT from S1. Lucie County International Airport To: Board of County Commissioners Paul A. Phillips, Airport Director April 3,2001 Airfield Signage Rehabilitation Project From: Date: Subject: On March 28,2000, the Board approved the submittal of the St. Lucie County International Airport Joint Automated Capital Improvement Program to the Florida Department Of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration. Due to the safety component of this project, both the FAA and FDOT made funds available. In September 2000, the construction bids for this project were opened. Since the bid opening, the project's engineer Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, the FAA, and the FDOT have reviewed the bids and concur that the project be awarded to the low bidder The Signal Group Inc. The following is a chart of the funding available for this project: Rehabilitate Costs Federal Share State Share Local Share Airfield Signage 90% 5% 5% Design $74,300.00 $66,870.00 $3,715.00 $3,715.00 Base Construction $539,174.76 $485,257.28 $26,958.74 $26,958.74 Altemate $110,280.00 $99,252.00 $5,514.00 $5,514.00 Pilot Controlled Lighting( ) $23,500.00 $0.00 $18,800.00 $4,700.00 TOTAL $747,254.76 $651,380.18 $54,987.79 $40,887.79 (I) The Pilot Controlled Lighting System was bid as part of the rehabilitate airfield signage project. This project has 80 percent funding from FDOT, however it is not FAA grant eligible. Therefore, the project reflects $0 federal funds. As a result, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners award the base construction bid and altemate bid to The Signal Group Inc. in the amount of $539,174.76 for the base bid and $110,280.00 for the alternate bid for a total project cost of $649,454.76 for the Airfield Signage Rehabilitation Project at St. Lucie County International Airport. I- W >W I-J: zen :Jz 00 0- I- We:( -...J O:J :Jm ~e:( 1-1- enc - m > I- Z ::J o o W - o . ::J ~ ..J D. . 0 I- 0 U) .. I- N « @) ::äE 0 « 0 O::I-~ o 0:: ~ OO~ O::D.o:: D.~W W«m O..J::äE ««W ZZI- °OD. - W o U) - ,^ ~CI-w O..J~C OWo::W ~¡:¡:WZ CO::I-W --ZD. m«_o '-' >wi 0 ::. æ u.. I- W a:: 0 ...J 0 W <I: ,.. 0 ,.. ~~ ...J C N It! ,.. W a:: ui M en W o I-W ... 0 ... ::- ,.. It!. N o C ID" a.. . a:: :J ... co :E 0 0<1: N ... M ,.. ... ~ <I:~!:!:....J 4ß 4ß 0 a:: æ Z" 0 I- 0 0 0 0 CM 0 ¡::: 0 0 0 Z'It W <I: c:i c:i c:i ...J W W l- N 0 N ::- Z N CO 0 u.. <I: Ñ 0" M 011 0 ...J -. N en ... o~!:.ii ID t' 4ß 4ß a:: -: ...J 0 ~ u.. 0 0 0 CN C! 0 0 Z'It :J a::CI) 0 on on W a:: .W~ ID 'It 0 ::- a.. a.. I- CO en CO .a::Zæ CO· ori' 'It -!O:¡:a.. CO en CO It) ~ ::t:O_CI) 4ß 4ß - a:: ...J ...,j 0 <l:0u.. ID 0 ID C... ,.. 0 ,.. Z'It Z~1i .¡ c:i .¡ W C)a..w ,.. CO It) ::- 1ñ:J!:: ... N 'It wOa.. en" 0" en ::t:a:::J M ... 'It It) ... ~ I-C):::!. 4ß 4ß C ãi ...J W ~ I- 0 91- <1:1- I- ŒlZ Zz C W 8 ffi:J Z CI) ~III- 0 <I: <I: ...J :E a:: ŒI <I: <I: C) :::::::::::::::: 0>0... "'''' ~ . C UJ I- ;:) m .;'æ Cl- UJ'" ¡¡õ ¡::: rn ';' Ol-C ZZUJ ",UJ> UJ:E¡¡j -;:)u ZUUJE «oa:o !1¡¡c",,, OCO~ --IU U£DŒl7ñ LLLLLL"C 000; a:a:a:E WLUWQ) mmm.., :E:E:E~ ;:);:);:)! z ZZ.. f LU~ '-' ""'" ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BIDDER'S CHECK LIST "'¥-' C:,r'-.- (.zJ1 , J/' BIDS MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED if the following documents and/or attachments are not completely filled out and submitted with your bid. Before sending in your bid, please make sure you have completed all of the following: ¿ ¡:(' I ...., - ~ rsI Ef ~ c:r o ~ (. o , Enclose two (2) sets of the Bid form (one m~rked original and one copy), including all handwritten sections, plus two (2) sets of any descriptive literature, brochures and/or supporting data. Please make and retain a separate copy of this bid package for your records. Bid Form, must be complete and have a manual signature (original signature) preferably signed in blue ink. Includ~ 5% bid security in the form of a cashier's check, money order or bond (if required). No xerox copies accepted. Originals only please. Include proof of proper licensing as stated in bid documents. Every page that has anything hand-written on it, must be imprinted with the company's name on the top right-hand corner of the page. Return bid in an envelope with the bid number and name of bid printed on the front of the envelope. If Fed-Ex or UPS-please keep bid in a separate sealed envelope when placing it in their packaging. Acknowledge in the bid any and all addendums issued and manually sign each addendum sheet and submit it with your bid. Provide three (3) references, preferably Governmental. Include name, address and phone number for similar work done in past year. Erasures or other descriptive literature, brochures and/or data must be initialed by the person signing the bid. If you desire a copy of the bid tabulation, include a self-addressed, stamped envelope for bid tabulation to be mailed back to you. fliII¡-- , PLEASE INITIAL AND RETURN WITH BID FORM Front-End-Specs/177P/072400 ¥ 'wi BID FORM All bids must be submitted in a sealed envelope addressed to the St. Lucie County Purchasing Manager, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 228, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, plainly marked on the outside with bid number, date and time of bid opening. BID # 00 - 090 Airfield Signage Program at St. Lucie County International Airport St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority I, 'n REPRESE"TINGJJ:\6 '8t&t-J..I\Lc+ø:xJRDJ:: Company and/or Co ation, agree to perform all ofthe requirements to complete the work required in the specifications for the price of: ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT TOTAL NO. QUANTITY PRICE PRICE BASE BIC ITEMS G-1oo-1 Performance and Payment LS X $ 32fX)·CO ILS = $ '32.CC>.CO Guaranty and Insurance G-100-2 Consideration for 1 LS X $ 3D.00 ILS = $ :30. CD Indemnification G-100-3 Mobilization LS X $ 1::£DW ILS = $ tþo.Oû G-100-4 Maintenance of Traffic LS X d fffi 00 ILS = $ I !'y)Ò . CD P-610-1 Runway Mar1<ing 2,500 SF X $ I.æ. ISF = $ 4700.00 P-610-2 Marking Removal 1,500 SF X $ 3.Qo fSF = $ 6BéD.CD L·108-1 Trench Minimum6' Wide x 400 LF X $ .{~O fLF = $ l.P4D.OO 28' Deep in Earth L-108-2 Hand Excavate Minimum 6" 1,000 LF X $ ID.IoO ILF = $ /D,/dX).[)D Wide x 28" Deep in Earth L-108·3 Hand Excavate Minimum 14·75 7, 316.rYJ 18' Wide x 36' Deep in 500 LF X $ ILF = $ Earth L-108-4 Underground Cabie L-824. Type C #8 1/C 5 kv in 18,000 LF X $ .67 ILF = $ (0, zld).{)() Conduit and New or Existing Ductbank L-108·5 #6 Bare Counterpoise ·16 = $ 35JDD{) Conductor Installed in 7,800 LF X $ . ILF Trench Front_End_SpecsI177PIOBOBOO 27 ~ "\--........,, "--J'......... ...·.~·__·I..........''6._· ¥ 'WI ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT TOTAL NO. QUANTITY PRICE PRICE L-108-6 #8 Insulated Green .4:? &rf),ff) Conductor Installed in 2,000 LF X $ ILF = $ Conduit and/or Ductbanks L·108-7 '/0' x 10' Ground Rods 35 EA X $ '12.cfJ lEA = $ 2,62D.DD L-108-8 '-Cable and Duct Locator! LS X $ (o,t£X).C:D ILS = $ 10, âJO.ã) Transmitter L-109-1 New L-828, 15 kW Ferroresonent Constant 3 EA X $ ~ ,~'2.D.í}) lEA = $ ,3Q.9fd).ro Current Regulator, 240V, .~ 3 Step L-109-2 Relocate Existing Regulator 4 EA X $ t¡Ef).C:f) lEA = $ ~ J Cfj).d) L-109-3 Remove Existing Regulator 2 EA X $ I 'è/). Cf) lEA = $ .31t:O.OO L-109-4 Modify Existing Airfield 1 LS X $ I, 3CÒ,W = $ /,!iXJ .00 Electrical Vault ILS L-109-5 Provide and Install New Airfield Lighting Control LS X $ 24. (dJ). [j) ILS = $ 24 , /dX).ùD System . L-109-6 Provide and Install Complete RTU Radio Controller for LS X $ 5/XÜf){) ILS = $ 5. CDi).í)O - Existing Beacon Control . L-110·1 1-2' Schedule 40 PVC 2.70 22, q5:J.OO Conduit Direct Buried in 8.500 LF X $ ILF = $ Place L-110-2 Directional Bore 1-2" Schedule 40 PVC Under 800 LF X $ /2.f8 =$Q,7I4,7iP Existing Runways, Taxiways ILF and Light cans L-110·3 1-2' Schedule 40 PVC = $ JB,cDò.W Conduit in Existing 1,500 LF X $ 12. (J.) ILF Pavement L-125-1 Locate and Intercept Existing Lighting System in Existing Pavement and r¿Q5.DD 6,W.ø Connect to Direct Buried 30 EA X $ lEA = $ Conductor System at Existing Stake Mounted Light Fixture Fron~End-Specs!177P/080800 28 "'\..,..1---- - ._-. -_-", ~"-J¡"""""- ¥ 'wi ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE PRICE L-125-2 Locate and Intercept Existing Lighting System in '2/;5.tXJ = $ II. ffìDiX> Earth and Connect to Direct 58 EA X $ lEA buried Conductor System at Existing Stake Mounted Light Fixture L-125-3 Identification of Cables, Ductbanks, and Lighting 1 LS X $ 1.3IdJ.tXJ ILS = $ /"BJd).no Fixtures Per FAA . Specifications A L-125-4 Remove Existing Signs LS X $J!r,BZDDD ILS = $ 14 . ßZD.OD . L-126-1 Type L-858 Taxiway 13 EA X $ '2,IDð,OD lEA = $ 27..3f)).w Guidance Sign, Module 1 L-126-2 Type L -858 Taxiway 30 EA X $ .3,3.~.W lEA = $ 1t::£1 D50.DD Guidance Sign, Module 2 L-126-3 Type L-858 Taxiway 29 EA X $ 4;w.ø lEA = $ 1'23.'2SiJ. DD Guidance Sign, Moduie 3 L-126-4 Type L-858 Taxiway 14 EA X $ 4,Q2DbD lEA = $ (p8,æ£>.oD Guidance Sign, Module 4 L-126-5 Modify Existing Guidance SN X $ ..ß/ó.W ISN = $ .3/6.DD Sign. Per Sign GRAND TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT $ 639. /74. 7/n ALTERNATE BID ITEMS L-126-1A Type L -858 Taxiway EA X $ 2/CúlY) lEA = $ Z .IW. DD Guidance Sign, Module 1 L-126·2A Type L-858 Taxiway 4 EA X $ 33.35.W lEA = $ lôô1o.DD Guidance Sign, Module 2 L-126-3A Type L -858 Taxiway 20 EA X $ 42éV.cD lEA = $ 65,1XO.OD Guidance Sign, Module 3 . L-126·4A Type L-858 Taxiway 2 EA X $ ¿¡qZf). DD lEA = $ Q,fYtD-DD Guidance Sign, Module 4 GRAND TOTAL ALTERNATE BID AMOUNT $ /Ib, 2..WJ.rfJ GRAND TOTAL BASE BID AND ALTERNATE AMOUNT $ ÚJ4q45~. 70 Fron~End-Specsl177P/080800 29 "-' WI EA = Each LF = Unear Foot LS = Lump Sum SF = Square Foot SN = Sign Bid Obligation 1\ is understood that this Bidder is bound by the bidding documents and that the bid may not be withdrawn during a period of 60 days after bid opening. The Board of County Commissioners and reserves the right to waive any informalities or minor irregularities, reject any and all bids which are incomplete, conditional, obscure, or which contain additions not allowed for, accept or reject any bid in whole ór in part with or without cause, and accept the bid which best serves the County. . PHONE: SIGNED BY: THE: S \0 tJJ\l Gecu P DJC-. .2:> ~ Com rYìey-ee VJ.cu.J ~'fcy Fl. 334~ ~t~r ~ . A . ~'&Á) TITLE: '01'( f" 1=t-6\dent DATE: q 16] (X) NAME OF BIDDER: ADDRESS: ~ Front-End-Specs/177P/080800 30 '-' WIllts ...",; Document A31 0 Bid Bond KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we (Here insert full name and address or legal title of COf1uactor) The Signal Group, Inc. 33 COMme~ce Way. Jupiter, FL 33458 as Principal, hereinafter called the Principal, and Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company 863 Creston Drive, Maitland. FL 32751 a corporation duly organized under the laws of the 5tate of New York as Surety, hereinafter called the Surety, are held and firmly bound unto st. Lucie County Board of County commissioners (Here insert full name al"ld addressor legal title of OWner) 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce. FL 34982 as Obligee, he(einafter called the Obligee, in the sum of (Here insert full name and address or legal title of Surety) Five Percent of the Ampunt Bid - - . - - Dollars ($ 5'11> - - - ), for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, the said Principal and the said Surety, bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted a bid for (Here insert full name, address and description of project) Airfield Signage Program at St. Lucie International Airport/Job No: 00091301/Bid No: 00-090 3000 Curtis King Boulevard Ft. Pierce, Florida 34946 NOW, THEREFORE, if the Obligee shall accept the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into a Contract with the Obligee in accordance with the terms of such bid, and give such bond or bonds as may be specified in the bidding or Contract Documents with good and sufficient surety for the faithful performance of such Contract and for the prompt payment of labor and material furnished in the prosecution thereof, or in the event of the failure of the Principal to enter such Contract and give such bond or bonds, if the Principal shall pay to the Obligee the difference not to exceed the penalty hereof between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for which the Obligee may in good faith contract with another party to perform the Work covered by said bid, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed this 13 day of September 2000 ./{'\ / , /;: I· 1 .' 1/ [{,ai, . The Signal Gzoup, Inc. Y" _. -"if ...- -. '·'...L/\_,' ... /í1; (Seal) ifez A. You (Seal) Attozney-in-Fact Inquizies: Prinhld In cooperation with Th. Am.rlcan I document confotms ..aclly 10 Ih. languag WC0054 of Architects (AlA) by Willis. Willis vouches Ihal Itw language In Ih. In AlA Docum.nt "'310, F.bruary 1970 Edition. 1 ~ AtlanticMutual Companies Atlantic MUtl' ' {nsurance Company Centennial ¡"-"'nce Company Power of Attorney ...., KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. that the Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company and Centennial Insurance Company, corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of New York hereinafter cailed Companies, do hereby appoint James W. Dunn, David H. Carr, Mirna Ramos, Denise Taylor, Kimberly A. Waller their true and lawful Attorneys·in-Fact to make, execute, seai and deliver on their behalf as surety any and ail bonds and undertakings of suretyship and other documents that the ordinary course of surety business may require. Such bonds and undertakings when duly executed by the aforesaid Attorney(s)-in-Fact shail be binding upon the Companies as fuily and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings were signed by the President and Secretary and sealed with its corporate seal. This Power of Attorney is issued pursuant to and by authority of the foilowing resolution of the Board of Trustees of Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company and the Board of Directors of Centennial Insurance Company adopted effective December 1, 1999 and now in full force and effect; RESOLVED that the Chairman, President or Senior Vice President-Surety may appoint other officers of the Company or agents of the Company to act as its lawful Attorney-in Fact in any State, Territory or Federal District to represent this Company and to act on its behalf within the scope of the authority granted to them in writing, which authority may include the power to make, execute, seal and deliver on behalf of this Company as surety, and as its act and deed, any and ail bonds and undertakings of suretyship and such other documents as are required in the ordinary course of surety business; and that the Secretary, Assistant Secretary or any Officer of the Corporation be, and that each or any of them is, authorized to verify any affidavit or other statement relating to the foregoing and to any resolutions adopted by its Board of Trustees (or Board of Directors, as applicable); and that any such Attorney-in-Fact may be removed and the authority so granted may be revoked by the Chairman, President, Senior Vice President-Surety or by the Board of Trustees (or Board of Directors, as applicable). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Companies has caused this Power of Attorney to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized Officer this Fourth day of Januarv. 2000. State of New Jersev } SS Couoty of Passaic "';tiCAl'''' ...~............17).... !Þ."/;~~'\>- .....%:\ .. "' .. ''0 '.' ,~, 1;..' \~\.... ..../~¡ &.<fN........O~· .....~.~.... Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company centenn'll:;;:mpan~ By \ ? ~t m~su~~ Thomas P. Gorke, SenidVice President ~ C'I ~ 0 "1.~ r.l ;:)-,.".'" - .'\lIes! l¿;). ---lß ~ V'- Michael B. Keegan, Vice Pre~ident o o o ... o o '" cD On this Fourth day of Januarv. 2000, before me, a Notary Public of the State and County aforesaid residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personaily came the above named officer of the Company who being by me first duly sworn according to law, did depose and say that he is the officer of the Company described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of the Company; that the seal affixed to such instrument is the corporate seal of the Company; and that the corporate seal and his signature as such officer were affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by order of the Board of Trustees (or Board of Directors, as applic~þl!!l:. . /." \MP,,¡" /~~·(o····. ~~ i~"'/~OT"I¡~\ '*' ¡.. ''Z', i,. : ...ú-·- )'; i Notary Public (Seal) '..'1-.... 8Ue. / .' <~:;Êìi~~"':·i My commission expires Februarv 18. 2002 I, the undersigned Michael B. Keeaan. Vice President of Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company and Centennial Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the original power of attorney of which the foregoing is a fuil, true and correct copy, is in fuil force and effect on the date of this Certificate and I do further certify that the Senior Vice President who executed said Power of Attorney was one of the Officers authorized by the Board of Trustees and Board of Directors to appoint an attorney-in-fact pursuant to the Board resolution stated above dated December 1, 1999. This Certificate may be signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the foil owing resolution of the Board of Trustees of Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company and the Board of Directors of Centennial Insurance Company, adopted at a meeting duly cailed and held on the 1st day of December, 1999. RESOLVED, that the use of a printed facsimile of the corporate seal of the Company and of the signature of an Officer of the Company on any certification of the correctness of a copy of an instrument executed by the Chairman, President or Senior Vice President-Surety pursuant to the Board resolution, dated December 1, 1999, appointing and authorizing an attomey-in-fact to execute in the name of and on behalf of the Company, surety bonds, undertakings and other instruments, shail have the same effect as if such seal and such signature had been manually affixed and made, is hereby authorized and approved. IN WITNESS WHEREOF..I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of each of fA A ~ the Companies to these presents this 13TH day of SEPTEMBER 2000. yv I MiCh~.~~ Vice Pre i~ To verify the authenticity of this Power of Attorney, call 1·800·444-6565 and ask for the Power of Attorney Clerk. _ i ~ ...." . ! ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT The Sigœl Group, Inc. Job# ADDENDUM 1 BID # 00-090 Acct OOps. 0 Est. ~ Reviewed By AIRFIELD SIGNAGE PROGRAM AT ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TO ALL PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS: This letter will serve as notification for an addendum to the above captioned project. This notice has been sent to all firms who to date have picked up and signed for the project's bid packagé at the St. Lucie County Pµrchasing Department. This addendum hereby becomes a part of the Plans & Specifications and should be included in the Cost Proposal as part of the Contract Documents. . PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES AND/OR ADDITIONS: FAA GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION WAS LEFT OUT OF BID PACKAGE. THIS DOES NOT EFFECT BID OPENING DATE. If you have any questions, call (561) 462-1700. Please sign and return by mail or fax to (561) 462-1294. NAMEOFFIR~ ~.btc. SIGNATURE: . ~ DATE: Plz:ðkÞ ENCLOSURES (57) . Proof of Proper Licensing St. Lucie County aid I ~ Airfield Signage PrOgram ..., '!be Signal Group, Inc. 33 Cœmerce Way Jupiter, Florida 33458 Initial .~ - - - - -:-:-~':'" -~ \.~ - -::: r: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -::~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- AC# :. 'I'" f" .:' . STATE OF FL()RIDA .. ' '" , 'I. ,,~ ',,,,, " _:1 '~.., " , "" ' [)EPARTMOH OF AUSINESSANOPROFESsioNAl REGULATION ELECT CONTRACTORSLICENSING.BD I· ~ICE~SE NRR C) ~ao ~:: . W> I'~ ~... r.;! @~ -J ,,< i I , ·>1 )7/31/2000 OO~D027? ER -0014627 The FU'r:TRICAL CONTRACTOR Named bélow . HAS R [I': 1ST [RE'J Under the provIsions of chap'fer 4 ß 9 FS. Expiration date: AU G 31, 2002 (INDIVIOUAL MUST ~EET All LOCAL COMPETENCY PRIOR TO CONTRACTING IN ^~y AREA) ". L- ' REQUIREMENTS ~tIGGINBOTW,M, ROBERT THE Sr:;NAI ';>.OU? ! fIIC 33 COMMEII \/AY JUPITER 33't58 JEIJ flUSH G[JVERNOR D!SPLAY A~ qEC'U!RED!!¥ LAW CYNTHIA A. HENDER: __ .SEfR.E.I.A!t'!'_ " .,....". . .-- ~'. ~ .'. ~,."" . ::.... - ~-_. - --- ~~--'-'-"-"".I~'~-' .- - ' ". ........ , . .. -, ....- -. -:.~._-- -- ...:~-..:. ---=...... __A_..... This Cer:lficate i5 subJect to St. Lucie County revocation and suspenslon by Co~tractor Certifica:io~ St. Lucie County Exao'r',i.=ung B.:.ard. Compl!: 17564- Status; ACTV DBA THE SrGNAL GROUP,INC T: ROBERT ARNOLD HIGGINBOTHAM has qualified L REGISTERED contractor ..~ -' . , .. for period from t County Code of Ordinances and 01 subject to St. Lucie . L ., .. Date: 08/14/00 ficial .1 , , , -- -- --- ..... ., ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT ADDENDUM # 2 September 5, 2000 BID # 00-090 I Airfield Signage Program .' TO ALL PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS: This le:ter will serve as notification for an addendum to the above captioned project. This notice has been sent to al: firms who to date have picked up and signed for the project's bid package at the SI. Lucie County Purchasing Department. This addendum hereby becomes a part of the Plans & Specifications and should be included in the Cost Proposal as part of the Contract Doc:Jments PLEASE NOTE THE FOllOWING CHANGES AND/OR ADDITIONS: ~ if you have any questions, call (561) 462-1700. Please sign and return this page by mail or fax to (561) 462-1294. NAMEOFFIRM~~ SIGNATURE: DATE: q /8/ CD ENCLOSURES 0.: References for Bid # 00-090 51. Lucie Intemational Airport Airfield Signage Program ¥ LANDS IDE SIGNAGE PROJECT Palm Beach County BaCC P.B INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DEPT. OF AIRPORTS BUILDING # 846 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406 Jack Provence 581-471-7464 WITHAM FIELD AIPORT Martin County Airport 1901 Southeast Airport Road Stuart, Florida 34996 Michael Moon 581-221-2373 NORTH COUNTY AIPORT Palm Beach County BaCC DEPT. OF AIRPORTS BUILDING # 846 WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33406 Fred Weaver 581-471-7464 ....,; The Signal Group, Inc. 33 Commerce Way Jupiter, Florida 33458 CONTRACT #: PB97-9 CONTRACT AMOUNT: 1,071,311.23 CONTRACT #: 4826110, 117, 128 CONTRACT AMOUNT: 355,317.00 CONTRACT # 2750-26 CONTRACT AMOUNT: 988,750.00 Initial . .!.~ ... ,. '" / I Credit can be '""' 'WI toward the DBE qoal will not be counted unless the DBE to be used certified bv the owner. ¡. . . . ....,..- _.-..- -.. .- - .----. ,.L.-1 ""- 9. Contractor's Reauired Submission. the following information rwith the may also be required- The owner requires ths submission of bid] Certain other DBE information MBE's MBE Subcontractors' Names ¡Addresses ¡ Identi tv' Subcontract work Item WBE's WBE Subcon~ractors Names!Adàressês/Identitv* subcontract work Item aSE's Other Socially and Economically Disadvangated Subcontractors Within the DiE Group Names/Adèr~sses!Identitv* \7:::f'~ps E(pr1-nr ~D.~. lTrnif\ic.c Tqfv', ~t-. ~I. .~ Jh~n{c. Subcontract Work Item rnJ.te,n·oJ Total Dollar Value of Subcontract Work Total Dollar Value of Basic Bid Total DBE Percent Dollar Value of subcontract Work $ $ $ $ Dollar Value of Subcontract work $ $ $ $ Dollar value of Subcontract Work $ .jOp"'rJ.LD $ $ $ $ $ $ . (Black, Hispanic, Asian American, American Indian. and other economically disadva:1taged) Appendix 1-:77A/9·1-0 - 21 - ¥ 'wi , St. Lucie County INTERNATIONAL AIR. , 'òN·l"1ò,¡a,¡'š'¥':¡¡'¡sû':¡¡'C¡¡'¡Sf'·> ... AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-6-B DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Airoort Paul Phillips SUBJECT: Award the base construction bid to Dickerson Florida in the amount of $40 1,195.13 for the Taxiway A-3 Improvement Project at St. Lucie County International Airport. BACKGROUND: In March 2000, the Board approved the funding request for the Taxiway A-3 project to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Due to the safety component of this project, both the FAA and FDOT made funds available. In September 2000, the construction bids for this project were opened. The engineer, the FAA, and FDOT have reviewed the bids and recommend that the project be awarded to the low bidder Dickerson Florida. FUNDS A V AILABLE IN ACCT#: Funds are available in Airport Taxiway A-3 Account. (140121- 4220-563000-46002) (140312-4220-563000-46002) PREVIOUS ACTION: In March 2000, the Board approved the funding request to the FAA and FDOT. In August 2000, the Board approved the professional services proposal with Williams Hatfield & Stoner and in September 2000 the Board acçepted the FAA funding. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners award the base construction bid to Dickerson Florida in the amount of $401,195.13 for the Taxiway A-3 Improvement Project at St. Lucie County International Airport. Reviews & Annrovals County Attorney: , - Originating Dept: ' Finance:(Check for OMBC.#2j -1n~ Purchasing Other: Other: py only, if applicable) COMMISSION ACTION: [XIAPPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: '-' ...,; St. Lucie County INTERNATIONAL AIR· 'iJR'FJaŸ¡8å'¡¡'I1'ëasùTiFèiJìist' STAFF REPORT from St. Lucie County International Airport Date: Subject: Board of County Commissioners Paul A. Phillips, Airport Director April 3, 2001 Airfield Taxiway A-3 Construction Project To: From: On March 28, 2000, the Board approved the submittal of the St. Lucie County International Airport Joint Automated Capital Improvement Program to the Florida Department Of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration. Due to the safety component of this project, both the FAA and FDOT made funds available. In September 2000, the construction bids for this project were opened. Since the bid opening, the project's engineer Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, the FAA, and the FDOT have reviewed the bids and concur that the project be awarded to the low bidder Dickerson Florida. The following is a chart of the funding available for this project: Construct Co sts Federal Share State Share Local Share Taxiway A-3 90% 5% 5% Design $79,700.00 $71,730.00 $3,985.00 $3,985.00 Base Construction $401,195.13 $361,075.62 $20,059.76 $20,059.76 TOTAL $480,895.13 $432,805.62 $24,044.76 $24,044.76 As a result, Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners award the base construction bid to Dickerson Florida in the amount of$401,195.13 for the Taxiway A-3 Improvement Project at St. Lucie County International Airport. I- >-W I-W z::¡: ::)tJ) Oz 00 W- -I- 0« ::)...J ...J::) .£0 1-« tJ)1- Q - £0 ...... ..J « z o - I- « z 0:: w I- Z - >- I- Z ::> o () w - () ::> ..J . I- en I- 0 « g en N I- () ~ Z ()~ w 00:: ~ mW W >-m > I-~ o Zw 0:: ::JI- a.. Oa.. I()~ ()W 0)- en O>-I-!:!:!C O«o::()W i~~3ffi C >< 0:: . a.. m~;;:t;o . ~ . « o o .. 'I"" 'I"" @ a: ° C~ z:tt W > a: ° CM Z:tt W > a: ° CN Z:tt W > a: ° C.... Z:tt W > ""'" oðl- ::¡: Cl)z U I-W et Z:¡¡ Woo 0 0 wl1. moo 0 0 :¡¡o z N.,.¡..¡.... Zl-..J W 00 ~ .... .... etCl)w CI) r-- N N N zw> .Z_ CO N ~ 00 c>wUw.J Q) Q) 0 Q) et:!!:C:!!::::!.u.. :; ~ ~ ~ zO Oz· -w ¡::: -U uCI)a: :::I!!:!w a:a:a:- WI-I-I1. C)CI)CI)I- zz:::la:~ etOc0.J a:u:!!:!!:.u.. c.: a: >O:¡¡~ l-u..J.J zl-etu.. :::I ..J 11. - :¡¡etl-::¡: :¡¡::¡:CI)U Ol1.wet CI):>w u et 2:..m ~ z .J ° ~ Cl)etl- a:ca: W-et ~a::::I U°l- -..JCI) cu.._ o 0 0 0 00 Q) f'! IØ cõ cci cci ~ r-- Q) 0.... r-- ~ CD ~ .... r-- r-- Q) :; ~ .... r-- It) IØ Q) ;¡ o 0 0 0 q 00 00 0 .... d cci cõ .... CO CO r-- Q) N It) r-- Q) .... N M .... 00 r-- ~ :; ~ :;¡ ~ C") .c) ~ C') ~ ... CD CO .,.¡ ai d ..¡ Ø') It) CD ... ... N ..... N .... N ~ CO o It) CD ... :; ~ ;¡ ~ et m ..J w w et I- I- I- C et et ~ ffi Z Z C a: a: z w w w .... CI) I- I- .... ~ ~ ~ ~ -- - --- "'~'" ..,~ N . C W I- ~ <C ;·æ CI- wrn U:c ¡::: U) ;" Ol-C zZW rnw> w::E[j -~u zUwE ;;:00::0 ::ECU>'! Occ~ __cu uccm1;) IJ..LLLL"C 000:; O::O::O::E WWWG,l CCa1aJ"C :E~:E... :;)~::;)G.I zzz..c.. '-' 'WI BID FORM All bids must be submitted in a sealed envelope addressed to the St. Lucie County Purchasing Manager. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 228. Fort Pierce. Florida 34982. plainly marked on the outside with bid number. date and time of bid opening. BID # 00·095 Taxiway Improvements at 51. Lucie County International Airport 51. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority I, \2o'i'-.sn-r 1:. ~.......,o'S REPRESENTING k],CJo.cn.sn..o -:¡:::l.D;1,./)I\-. ~<... Company and/orCorporatlon, agree to perform all ofthe requirements to complete the work required In the specifications for the price of: ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT TOTAl NO. QUANTITY PRICE PRICE G-100-1 PerIonnance and Payment lS X S '1o~ t"l ILS = s 3 0"1, :,. t' Guaranty ¡n InSUlinœ G-100-2 Consider3lion for lS X S \ . ".,'" /HR = S \ 0"). qc¡ Indemnification G-100-3 Mobilization lS X S 'c..q1.ç.~ ILS = S '41.'11.5'.. ,;.q G-10Q.4 Maintenance of Traffic lS X S <¡"'l1R.:!.1 ILS = S ~;¡"i. $~ P·150-1 Mming Pavement (2" or less) 4.800 SY X S /.~(., ISY = S (.~~,oo P·151·1 Clearing ¡n Grubbing 5.5 AC X S "'-'I. c¡ q lAC = S I'I~.'I!> P·152·1 Undassiied Excavationl 7,100 CY X S "\.'1.0; ICY =S")O\")~.oo Embankment P·160-1 StaÞilized Subgrade (12") 8.500 SY X S ':2.,'1 ISY = S \ lrS'lo. Øð P·211·' Umerodt Base (8') Primed 8.500 SY X S ~.,ç ISY = S ,31:1.1::.0. P401·' Bituminous Surface Course 2,400 TN X S ~"t"J /TN = S \0") '1S~._o P-620-1 Runway Mar1<ing 2.300 SF X S 0.<;'1 ISF = S \ ~~""'..o 0·701·2 24' RCP Class V IF X s !;;Z¡,. Co 7 ILF = S r::. '1c.. "7 0-751·1 Drainage Inlet· TypeD 1 EA X S "\"'h.~ç lEA = S 'I 'f''')..':!..$' 0-751-2 Modify EJisting Drainage 2 EA X S ,\'\1,,\.1'4 lEA = S 'I'HC¡.I{f' Structure Front -End·Specs/178P/090 1 00 27(R) ¥ ....., ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT TOTAL NO QUANTITY PRICE PRI:E 0-790·' Turbidity Curtain 500 LF X $ <...\0 lEA : $ 10So. 00 T·901·1 Seeding and Mulching 14.000 SY X $ O.Lt" ISY : $ 1'1:"0.00 T-904-1 Sodding 4.300 SY X S l·dot ISY : $ '1411..00 T-905-1 T opsoiling 18.300 SY X $ O.",c. ISY : $ lL o7/r.<::>" L-108-1 T rencl1 Minimum 8' Wide x 100 LF X $ I· ì L.. ILF : $ I ì"l. 00 28' Deep in Earth L-108-2 Hand Excavate Minimum 8' 200 LF X $ \1. \ '3. ILF : $ ~.....(...oo Wide x 28' Deep in Earth L·108-3 Hand Excavate Minimum 18' 100 LF X S 11..5:'3. ILF = S \ 1.~'3.. 00 Wide x 36' Deep in Earth L·108-4 #8, 51.... 1/C. L-824 Conductor Installed in New 4.000 LF X S 0''-0 ILF = S ''1. 00. oc:> Conduit. Junction Boxes, and Fixtures L-108-5 #6 Bare Counterpoise 2.200 LF X S 0."" ILF = S \ (:)'3\{, oe, Conductor Installed in Trench L·108-6 %" x 10' Ground Rod Connected to Counterpoise 6 EA X S ì ~ . Coo lEA = s '\ $>. c. .. Every 500' L-110-1 1 Way T Schedule 40 PVC Condu~ Q;æct Buried in 2.300 LF X S ~.(5: ILF = $ '11;'1.1;."0 Place L·110-2 1·Way, T Schedule 40 PVC Condu~ Conaele Encased in 700 LF X S \ '1. b S ILF = S l 0 ~S~. 00 Place L·125-1 l-861TQ Medium Intensity Elevated Taxiway Edge 26 EA X S 0nq . ~ 0 lEA = S '2.~ 'n~. '\.0 light. Base Can MOIInted l·12S-2 L-867 1T Diameter Junction Box With Cover Complete in 4 EA X S ,~ L."IG. lEA = S 4 ì ~'\, f< Place L·125-3 Identification of Cables. Ductbanks, and lighting LS X S \ >.1.."1, ~ "':. ILS = S \ l./ø.Lt, "'"'., Fixtures Per FAA Specifications L-12~ Remove Existing Edge lights LS X S b{,.1.'t1,. ILS = S (pG, \. " Go L·125-5 Locate and Intercept Existing 4 EA X S "2..\~.J.", lEA = s 'CGD . q.l- D~ect Buried Circu~ System Front-End-Specs/17BPI090100 28(R) "'-" ..., ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT TOTAL NO QUANTITY PRICE PRICE L-125-6 L-850C Medium Intensity Flush Mount Runway Edge 3 EA X S " '1 DC.. In lEA = $ ì '2.\".. 'it Light. Base Can Mount~-2 L·126·1 L-858 Guidance S<gns. Size 3 EA X $ ~'2.'7o.~ç. lEA = $ q~ll.l,-/ 2, Module 2 L·126-2 L-858 Guidance S<-¡ns. Size 3 EA X S 41..57.51 lEA = $ l"2-ì'7J..S' 2. Module 3 SUB TOT AL BASE BID AMOUNT $ 40\ \q~. n, , Al TERNA TE A ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT TOTAL NO. QUANTITY PRICE PRICE G-1()()..4A Maintenance of T raffle LS X $ "'Ç"73.~71 IlS = $ I..¡ 5"71.. ,::!. P-150-1 A Mming Pavement (2" 01' Less) 900 SY X $ 3.~ ISY = $ >'t~....oo P-151-1A Clearing and Grubbing 3.9 AC X $ '!.\'i. "v lAC = $ I~~~.'~ P-152·1A Unclassified ExtavationI 3,500 CY X $ "1..'" ICY = $ l (."~D..O Embankment P-160-1A Stabilized Subgrade (12") 5.700 SY X $ I.c;.~ fSY = $ \ ...C\..~ 00 P-211-1A Umerock Base (8') Primed 5,700 SY X $ ~,ç\ ISY = $ 'Iýç..,.oo P401·1A Bituminous Surlaœ Course 1.200 TN X $ "1."- '"1 /TN = $ 9~,ç,.oo P-S20-1A Runway Mar1dng 1.700 SF X $ O.Q> /SF = $ C! f(.,.eo D-701-2A 36' RCP Class V 150 LF X $ i"l...... IlF = $ \-:a.r..-.ð., D-751-1A Drainage Inlet - Type D 2 EA X $ '" '61r"l.~.. lEA = $ q"'l(."". 'I" D-751·2A Modify Existing Dránage EA X $ "\,.,q'l. "If( lEA = $ '\oQ4.,i' S1rudure T·901·1A Seeding and Muknng 9.800 SY X $ (';)"i fSY = $ ~ ''i'i...o H04·1A Sodding 3.400 SY X $ \. O"t fSY = $ ')~"3"."", T-905-1A T opsoiling 13.200 SY X $ 0.(.(. fSY = $ Cjr"lI'1..00 L-1084A #8. 5kv, 11C. L-824 Conductor Installed in New 2,600 LF X $ O.c.o IlF = $ l5(.ø ...eo Condun. Junction Boxes, and Fixtures Front-End-Specs/178P/0901oo 29(R) "'" -...I ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT TOTAL NO. QUANTITY PRICE PRICE L-108-5A #6 Bare Counterpoise 2.300 LF X S O.~ì IlF = $ lo'i!l.t>o Conductor Installed in Trench L·t08-6A ';" x 10' Ground Rod ConMcted to Counterpoise 6 EA X $ ( C;.(.o lEA = $ '-tç>. c;.u Every 500' l-110-1A 1 Way 2' ScI1edute 40 PVC Conduit Direct Buned in 2.100 LF X $ "I.. IS; IlF = $ ~'IC;.oo Plaœ L-110-2A I·Way, 2' Schedule 40 PVC Conduit Concrete Encased in 150 LF X $ , ..... I.> IlF = $ "'). IC:¡ì. 1;0 Place L·125-1A L-861TQ Medium Intensity Elevated Taxiway Edge 32 EA X $ Q"3F1.70 lEA = $ "o.,o.~'-' Lighl Base Can Mounted L-125-5A Locate and Intercept Existing 5 EA X $ "2. Ie;.....'" lEA = $ \ ,,'c..~o Direct Buried Circuit System L-125-1A L-$58 Guidance Signs, Size 2 EA X $ "1.'2."o.Sg lEA = $ '~"i\. \1. 2, Module 2 L-125-2A L-$58 Guidanœ Signs. Size 4 EA X $ ....'2., ~"7.~~ lEA = $ Lïo~.oFr 2, Module 3 SUBTOTALAtTERNATEA $ '2. ~2. "2C;.... IS AL TERNA TE B ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT TOT At NO. QUANTITY PRICE PRICE G-100-4B Maintenanœ of Traffic LS X $ IO'....c¡'1 IlS = $ 1".,4. '\""1 P-15Q.1B Milling Pavement (2' or Less) 2.900 SY X $ 0'<'-1 ISY = $ I S,l...... P-151-18 CIeaing and Grubbing 2.2 AC X $ C;ïì.", lAC = $ \ "a.'.. 't.""l P-152-1B Undassified Excavation! 1,100 CY X $ ~-'1.'1, ICY = $ OI..S't."OÞ Embankment P·160-1B Stabilized Subgrade (12") 3,400 SY X $ '2... If( ISY = $ ''tI':!..ÞO P-211-1B Limerod< Base (8') Primed 3,400 SY X $ ç. . "5 ISY = $ '1"\~'O."C) P401-1B Bituminous Surtace Course 750 TN X $ Y.""I.ì3 /TN = $ ....3.S"\,. ~o P-620-1B Runway Mar10ng 1.200 SF X $ 0.':.& ISF = $ Goq ". oeo Front-End-Specs/I7BP/090 1 00 30(R) -~....-... -- ....... ...., ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT TOTAL NO. QUANTITY PRICE PRICE 0-701·28 36' RCP Class V 150 LF X S 1(,'1.00 ILF = S \')..(,,<>0.00 0-751-18 Oralnage Inlel - Type 0 2 EA X S ~"'i' J,'À,,\ lEA = S <\1(.<.\. 't "" T-901-18 Seeding and Mulching 5.000 SY X S t:>'L~ ISY = S 1"'.=.00 T-904-18 Sodding 2.300 SY X S t.o..... fSY = S 73'1'2..0= T·905-18 T opsoiling 7.300 SY X S 0." fø ISY = S '-I 'il1~. 00 L-10B-l8 #8. 5kv, 11C. L-824 Conductor Installed in New 1,800 LF X S O.t.o ILF = S I oil!), 00 Conduit. Junction Boxes. and Fixtures L·108-58 #8 Bare Counterpoise 1.ô5D LF X S 0·111 ILF = S ì1S.,>o Conductor Installed in Trench L-108-6B y.' x 10' Ground Rod Connected to Counterpoise 3 EA X s '';;''-0 lEA = $ ... 'l.c.. 80 Every 500' L·11()'1B 1 Way 'l' Schedule 40 PVC Conduit Direct Buried in 1,400 LF X $ 4.tS ItF = $ S fl 0.0" Place L-11()'2B 1-Way. 'l' Schedule 40 PVC Conduit Concrete Encased in 260 LF X $ , 't. c..S ILF = $ "1 ?o<1 . 00 Place L-12S-1B L-861TQ Medium Intensity Elevated Taxiway Edge 20 EA X $ qi~.'o lEA = $ I 'ê-ì"l't. 0<> Ught. Base Can Mounted L-12S-2B L -867 1'l' Diameter Junction Box With Cover Complete in 2 EA X $ (, t'2.."tt. lEA = $ 11.G.<i,.ct¿, Place L-12S-5B Locate and Intercept Existing 4 EA X $ -:2. \o;.'\."i lEA = $ 'isf.o.'H.. Direct Buried Circuit System L·12&-2B L-858 Guidance Signs. Size 4 EA X $ 1...\"~;'7. S ~ lEA = S l ì o~" . e>[r 2. Module 3 SUBTOT Al ALTERNATE B $ 1(,1.\. ïr.O. (.\ GRAND TOTAl BID AMOUNT $ ß \~ "2.\1...\. ý,\ , Front -End-Specs/178P/0901 00 31(R) '-' .,¡ AC' Acre CY' Cubic Yard EA' Each LF = linear Foot LS = Lump Sum SF = Square Foot SY = Square Yard TN = Ton Bid Obligation It is understood that this Bidder is bound by the bidding documents and that the bid may not be withdrawn during a period of 60 days after bid opening. The Board of County Commissioners and reserves the right to waive any informalities or minor irregularities, reject any and all bids which are incomplete, conditional, obscure, or which contain additions not allowed for, accept or reject any bid in whole or in part with or without cause, and accept the bid which best serves the County. NAME OF BIDDER: ADDRESS: V r \cat>. SÞoJ t:'LØ~' oA- . ::¡::",c....- ? ,n . t:> 7.! A-<...J,;:.t:>- t 0.. S Ì'J AI«.'\ F l.- "l ~ q q .s Ç~:f~á17 ~~~ c:. -n.~"D.s PHONE: SIGNED BY: TITLE: \/".1= '?.¡;........~ DATE: q. I~. 00 Front-End-Specs/17BP/090100 32{R) '-' -....I ST. LLCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT ADDENDUM #1 September 5, 2000 BID #00-095 Taxiway Improvements TO ALL PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS: This letter will serve as notification for an addendum to the above captioned project. This notice has been sent to all fl1Tlls who to date have picked up and signed for the project's bid package at the St. Lucie County Purchasing Departrnent. This addendum berebybecomes a part of the Plans & Specifications and should be included in the Cost Proposal as part of the Contract Documents. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES AND/OR ADDITIONS: SEE A IT ACHED If you have any questions, call (561) 462-1700. Please sign and return this page by mail or fax to (561) 462-1294. :I:::~ŠßT'~ DATE: O¡ - 11. -co C> ENCLOSURES -. .....~ ......- .,. ...-~.....- .J.""'t.. ¥ ...., 9. Cent rac: 'Jr' s Reaui red Submission. The e'Wfler requi res ths submission -;.: the fo:':'Jwing information [with the bl-:'1. Certain other DBE informatl:':l. may als:. be required. MBE's MBE Subco~:=actors Names/Address~s/Identity· c::; I~O uE"j Subcon:ract h~rk l:em Dollar Value 0: Subco:îtract We:,,;": ""'A.\JLIU!r C; S (;'í S .'¡'o $ $ $ $ WBE's WBE Subco~~ractors Names/Addresses/Identitv' Subcontract Work Item Dollar Value of Subcontract Work $ $ $ $ OSE's Other Socially and Economically Disadvangated Subcontractors Within the DBE Group Names/Addresses/Identitv' Subcontract Work Item Dollar Value of Subcontract Work $ $ $ $ Total DBE Percent $ 5 S'-G5. §o $ "\0\ \~C;.\'3 $ 1'\,iZ Total Dollar Value of Subcontract Work Total Dollar Value of Basic Bid . (Black, Hispanic, Asian American, American Indian, and other economically di sadva.:1taged) Appendix 1-118A/9-1·0 - 22 - .t:KJ DICKER~ FLORIDA, INC. A CQMPA.NY Of THE IX:KERSON GROUP we ...., 3340 S.E. 0;... H~w.y Stuan. F'k)ncLt ~997 PO, Orawer 719 Slu.", Florida 3ot9'95 (561) 2870682() FAX (561) 287-4660 REFERENCES Vernon Hackett, Resident Engineer Florida Dept. of Transportation 3601 Oleander Ave. Fort Pierce, fL 34982 (561) 489-7072 Walter England, City Engineer City of Port St. Lucie 121 S.W. Port St. Lucie Blvd. Port St. Lucie, fL 34984 (561) 871-5177 Lee Webberman, County Engineer Martin County 2401 S.W. Monterey Road Stuart, fL 34986 (561) 288-5927 ------ ¥ BID BOND 'wf/I . KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we Dickeson Florida, InCo as Principal, hereinafter called the Principal, and Seaboard Surety Company corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York as Surety, hereinafter called the Surety, are held and finnly bound unto Board or County Commissionen or St. Lucie County FL as Obligee, hereinafter called the Obligee, in the sum of Five Percent or Amount Bid ($ S % Amt Bid) for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, the said Principal and the said Surety, bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally fU1l1ly by these presents. WHEREAS, the principal has submitted a bid for Taxiway Improvements at St. Lucie County International Airport, Bid No. ~S NOW THEREFORE, if the Obligee shall accept the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into a Contract with the Obligee in accordance with the terms of such bid, and give such bond or bonds as may be specified in the bidding or Contract Doc:wnents with good and sufficient surety for the faithful performance of such Contract and for the prompt payment of labor and material furnished in the prosecution thereof, or in the event of the failure of the Principal to enter such Contract and give such bond or bonds, if the Principal shall pay to the Obligee the difference not to exceed the penalty hereof between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for which the obligee may in good faith contract with another party to perform the Work covered by said bid, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full fon:e and effect. Signed and sealed this 13th day of September ,1000. ~ I?:þrw~ Witn c.... ~~(' --.." e..Q..' -là~ C lifßÞ~ By: ¿&) o ere . ounds - . Vice President Seaboard Surety Company C" (Surety) By: ê: '-,- C í.J.c. a ,-cL Eileen C. Heard, Attorney-in-Fact and Florida Licensed Resident Agent AlA Doc:ument A31 0 Bid Bond 2/70 Edition The St Rtul POWER OF A'IÏORNEY . ~.board Sun'l~ Compan~ St. Paul Fin and Man1M' Insunnet Compan) 51. raul Guardian Insunnet Compan~ St Paul "breu') Insur.net Compan)" Unllltd Slatu FkSl'Utl and Guaranty Company Fldfiity and Guaranty Insunntt Company Fide-lily and Guarani)" Insura~ Undf'rwrltus.lnc. Po"~r or AUornf') :\0. 20390 Cc-rtincalt ~o. 426523 KSO", ALL ME~ BY THESE PRESE~TS Th.1\ S~300ard SUfel)' Company is a corporation dul~ or~anilC'd under Ihe I¡ "I"~ of the Slate of ~C'...... Yorl.;. and thon 51. Paul Fire and ~bnnC' In"uranl.:C' Compan~. SI Paul Guardian Insurance Company and SI. Paul MercuT) In!our.¡n¡;C' Compan~ are corporation.. duly organlzcd under the 11""5 of lhe StalC' of Min~~OIa. and !.hat l;nited S(alC:~ Flddlly and Guannt)" Compan)' is a corporation dul) organilCd under the la.....s of the Slate: of Mat}'land. and mat Fidelity and Guaranty Insuranc~ Company I~ a corporation duly organiU'd under the laws of th~ Stat~ of 10wa. .md thai Fidelil)' and Guannt) Insurance Underwrilers. Inc. i~ a corporation dul) of!;anizc=d und~f r.hC' 13.... ~ of the Stale of WÎscon~in (h~"àn (·o/lt'ct;n'1.\ coll~d th(' "Cnmf>t1n;~J" J. and thai the Companies do hereby make. con~utute and appoinl E. J. O'Man, Peter A. Thomson, Eileen C. Heard and Pat E. White ofthe' City of . Scate . their true and la.....fut Anomeyfs)·in-Facl. each in Ihcir separate capacity if mort" than one is named above. 10 sign its name IS surety 10. and 10 execute. seaJ and acknowledge any and all bonds. undenakjngs. ronU'aCtS and other "orinen instruments in me n.alUre thereof on behalf of the Companies in Ihcir business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons. guannteeing the performance of contractS and exccuung or guaranletmg bonds and undertakings ~ or ~tted in any act.10ftS or proccedmgs allowed by law. .,:~ l.'" ,\) IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Companaes have caused thiS mstrumc~""'1ig~~~\' st day of December 1?99 " " ". ~X' Seaboard Su...., Com""",' . ~l." ~". ~ted sw.s FIcIeIIty aad G........ty C.m.....y SI. "'ul Fi... lAd Marin. Ins_u~.m~ \:. . \', FIcIeIIty aad Guaraaty Jasuruœ Com.....y St. Paul Guardia. losuranl'\ IIo)hP'!"l'o..~' - .\ '\ \ ..'1 FldeUty lAd G.."",ty Jasuruœ Uaderwriten,løc. St.....IM.rnu') Insu.....t~· ~ ~,'Ç" t- d 11. ,~:__~.M ,s' -,'°6 f-o v~--tr ø ~ '~~ €> JOHN F MNNEY.V.x_KkM ~ R. \Ác.~ Tampa Florida ~ Slale of Maryland City of 8ahi~ MICHAEl. R. MCKIBBEN. Assiswllt Secmary On lIIis 1st day of December 1999. "'for< me. .... undeRigned .ffo<cr. personally appear«! John F. Phinney and Michael R. McKibben. who ackno....kdgN themsclve!o 10 bt Ihc Vice Pn::sidml and AssiSIaDI Secretary. respecti....ely. of Seaboard Swct)· Company. St. Paul FU'C and Marine Insuranct Company. S.. Paul Guardian Insurance Company. SI. Paul Mercury Insurance Company. Untied Scates Fidelity and GuaranlY Company. Ftdeliry and Guaranty InsUrance" Compan)·. and Ftdelit) and GUar3l1I)' Insurance Underwrilers.lnc.: and I.haI the seals affixed 10 me foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of said Campanics; and that they. as such. being aulhorized so 10 do. eJ(<<ulcd the foregoing instNmenl for the purposes lhcrcia concaJned by signing the rwnes of Ihc corporations by themselves as dul) :authorized o(fteeß. M~ Commi~s¡on e'lpire~ the 13lh day of July. ~{)(C ~.t~.~AIA In Witness Whereof. I hereunlo ~t m~ hand and ( Ificlal ~al. REBECCA EASLEY-ONOKAlA. Sotar:. Public 86201 Rp.,¡ l' .00 c.;...."'..¡ ... " c ., Thl" prJ·..~r of A((om~~ I" panl~d under and hy th¡:-~orit~ of thi:' follo\lo mg (l·:o.\.,luIlOO" adopl~d hy' thi:' Board,,'~'~u(,~1or~ of S~ah.),3rd Surt't)· Company. SI. Paul Flr~ OInd \t4nni:' In..urOln((' C(!mraT1~. 51. Paul Guitrdlan In!ioUrólnl'l;" ('llmrany, St Paul \t~rcul') In..uranc¡:- Company. Cnll('d Slate:" Fid<:llly aoJ Guaranly Company. F dr:lil~ and GuaroÍlnf~ In..ur¡IT1i:(' (nmp<lny. anJ Fujehty and GuaraOl) In..uran\."(' rnd(',....nl~r...lnÇ. on Stpl('mher~, Iqq~. whit.:h n:..nlu(I\'n~ arc now in full force and dfccf. r~;.dln~ a.. follo....,.. RESOD ED.lhOllln conn("I,Ofl with tm- fiddity and surct) m..uran((' hU..UIC.... nfthe Company. all rond... undc:rta~in~..,('ontr¡ cl" anJ \~her in..trumcn[!io rtlalmg III ..aId !'Iu'mc.... ma~ t'Il' "Igncd. c~('~'ulcd, and Ok.-kn\'~ I('d~('d hy ¡J(r..on' \lr ('1I[iliC" arrxlinlcd a.. Attom('yhl·m-Facl rur..uant tl' a P\\~('r of AUornc:) 1....ucd in óil:t.:nrdar;.;e with thc<,( r('\(1Iullon.. S<iid Po.....:r(..) of Altom(') fur and on Þchalf (If th(' Cump.my may and ..hall tx- ('1,('l'ull;"d 1ß lhe- namt .aM I,n hc=haH of the C"mpJn~. ('llhr:r toy th,,' ChOllrman, or Ihc Pre..idenl. or an) \'Ú:c Pr('"dr:-nl. I'r an A....i..tant \'h:~ Pre:..ídent. JU1ntl~ ....tth the Sta~la~ ,'r an A..~i"lant S~netJr;.. unJl:r th.:¡! r('''~~'II\e d~...'~n¡¡lIon~, ~ ..ignaturc: l,f ,ud\ l,ffî..-er, ma~ he r:-n~r:J\l"d. '1rinlcd or lilhogr¡lphr:-d Thl' ..ignOllur"·l1f~.Kh 1'1 the.- forc!;(lìn~ officer" and Ihe .....J! (.1 the Ülmp..n~ m;,¡y Þc afr".ed hy fa.:~imilc In an~ p"wer uf Auomr:-) nr III Jny l'e,rtifu:at(' rclallnf' th~r~to 3rJ"C'jntln~ An('~~h).in-Fal·1 fur pUt'p;,..r.. onl~ ,,1' c\e~'utlnf' ¡¡nu :Jt":~lIn!! N)nd~ and unJ~nal.;lng" ,mJ ~>4hl'r ....mlnf'.. l.hJif':JIO~ 10 Ihe natufe fhr:rr:nf. and ..uhjC.·\.'1 II' an~ 1,"\1(;,.111.'"' '01;"1 fonh therein, any '\o.:h Pl'....Cf of An{\me~ \If \.'('nlfKatc heanng ..och fa..-"mlll: ...ignaturc: I'f (:J~'''Lll1Ik -.('411 ..hall be \'ahd and tJinJinf' upon the Company. and any ..ul'h po....ef '\0 e),(,,'u1cd .Jnd ccnifu:d h~ ~u\.'h faç..imilc ..il=nalurc anJ fa~'''lmil~ -<aJ ..hall ~, \aliJ and blT1ding upon the Company Vollh r("f'I.',:1 h\ an~ l:'oI'nd m undena~int- 10 \Iotll...·h 1\1.. \alujJ) allOl,,'hr:d: and RESOLVED rl"RTHF.R. that Attormyj!i.l-in-Fal,:' shall ha\(' the' po....r:r and aUlhority. and. in an~ case:. ..utlj('I,,'1 In the lerm.. and hmllalions of the POVoer of .\lh\lTH."~ b..uc:d th('m.l\'I c\ecutc <ilk! d~Ii\'Cf on ~half (If the Company and 10 an.:J..'h the '01;"011 of Ihe Compan~ I~' any ~md 4I1I1:'oI1nJ' and unJcnal.;inf'" ,¡¡nJ olh<r ....ntmp oÞII£ator;. 10 the nalure th<'r('of. and any su~h m...trumtnl e\.ecul('d 1>y ~u..-h AltomeybHn·Fact ..hall ~ ".. hlßdln¡; uf"ln the C~'mpan~ .... If "Igned ~~ .111 E~(,cull\e Officer and sr:-alcd and auC'..~d 10 b)' the: Sc:CfClM} of1h1: Company. l. Mi..::hJr:1 R \kt..;,lhl.'lC'n. A~.."tanl SccrC'taf) of Seaho¡¡rJ Surety Cumpan~. Sf. Paul fir~ and Marine: In:o;uran~c Compiln). SI. Paul Gu.ardian In...ural"lce Cl,lmpany. 51 Paul \kr..::ul') IT'I~urOlncc Company. Uniled State... Fide!!I)' and Guar<tnt~ CumpOln~, Fld.:lil) .and Guarant) In..ur.ml.'e Company. and Fk.klity and Guarani) IT'I,ur4lr",:~ l'ndeNmer~. In\.'. do hc:re:h) ..::enify tht,ll the ubo'.c and fClf('¡;oin~ i.. ..Irue and ~OlTe"-1 cop~ of 1he PO\lo~r of AUt'me~ r:-~r:-t:ut~ hy "ólid Cttmpa.nie.... ......hich i, in full for....e and dfC1:t and ha~ not bC"en rnoled. 1:\ TESTI"10~\· \"HEREOF.I hcreun.o set my hand thi~ /.~I . o d,) ur '- )c.f)..j.¿", µ, .óbø ~ R. \.Ac.~ ~h.:1\a('1 R 't.:KIN'1en. ....""I:lnl ~.~~ P/~ø$~ "/~"/O f"~ Po.'~r of Alfornt'." number. \, .' , . { . . . ... 4 ~ : -, . Il1o.....__....... I .; . ~..., ._, ., - ....... ...4, . . ". . "~:,,., ..:' ",'1.' .,.... It,. .;..,~.I,'.·' ..~'~~'.,.../.'.:.( ..... . I ' . .# . ....#.. ". ,..t."· ~ '. . ".. .. r··.. '" . ........:'-. ... ·.···...r~·I.·. }'I -' t..,.. -, . . . . ....,.. '( . '. .' ".;" ". ,,:, í ,"-. .'. .. .' .. . . ." ........ '. . .' .., " , ~58-9ijš2-------------~;;;E~~~~;~;;----------------------- · DéPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION CONST INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD ~ ~~~:;::O;:; TIll CENEUL CONTUC T œ ......... IS CERTlFIE D ...... ....... If I:bmr '89 fl. &,Iratlll"Mi-AlJ;--n, zooz DALE!. LARRY THOICAS DIClta:RSON FLORIDA IN: P 0 DRAWER 719 STUART FL 3\995 JF.8 -!JS,", ;OV:RNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED 8Y LAW CYNTHIA A. HENDERSON SECR:TARY --.------.- - "'\ ../ "'" wi AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. c-1 DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [X] SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Community Services PRESENTED BY: Beth Rvder. Director ø TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Certificate of Participation for the Drug Control and System Improvement Program (Edward Byrne) Grant for 2001/02 from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. BACKGROUND: Since 1991 St. Lucie County has served as the coordinating unit of government for allocation of funds from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement Program. This grant is used by the Police Departments of Fort Pierce, Port St. Lucie and the Sheriff's Office. FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None for FY01/02 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board Certificate of Participation Enforcement Program. authorize for the the Chairman to sign Florida Department of the Law [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: [ ] DENIED Anderson Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: Purchasing: County Attorney: ~ dn p.]'"""'\ Originating Department Other: Finance: Check for Copy only, if applicable .' ~: RECEI\"" . n~.' ...., '.. ,.'. . : APR 0 3 2001 . ~ "" F.LE Florida Department of Law Enforcement Office of Criminal Juatlee Granta Mailing Address: Office of Criminal Justice Grants Florida Department of Law Enforcement 1819 Mlccosukee Commons Tallahassee, Florida 32308 (850) 410-8700 James T. -rim- Moore Commissioner March 26, 2001 <:) ..., The Honorable Paula Lewis % ~"" Chairman, St. Lucie County '\M~ 3 0 7001 ?:õ ~;. Board of Commissioners '" . ...,,~ l ~ ~- 2300 Virginia Avenue . - fTI:t: Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 .. . ª ~g '" ....:z: .. ~.... RE: Federal Fiscal Year 2001 Bvrne State and Local Law Enforcement Assistc{t1þ-ª~-< Formula Grant -- Local Share -t . Dear Ms. Lewis: ., The Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) anticipates the Federal Fiscal Year 2001 (State Fiscal Year 2002) award from the United States Department of Justice to be $14,162,217 for Local Share Edward Byrne State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant funds. While this is a slight increase over the current year funding, it still reflects approximately $300,000 reduction from the previous year. To help offset this reduction, FDLE plans to allocate statewide $108,530 from residual funds, which should minimize your county's reduction to no more than 10% from the previous year. In accordance with provisions of Chapter 9B-61, Florida Administrative Code, FDLE has set aside $205,487 of these funds for use by all units of government within St. Lucie County, The Federal Fiscal Year 2001 (State Fiscal Year 2002) Program Announcement is enclosed for your use and provides guidance for submission of applications for these funds. These funds may be used by local units of government to implement projects that offer a high probability of improving the functioning of the criminal justice system, aggressively and effectively responding to violent crime, or reducing drug trafficking and abuse. Chapter 9B-61.008, Florida Administrative Code, requires that as a condition of participation in this program, the units of government in each county reach consensus concerning the expenditure of these funds, including the projects to be implemented Committed to Service' Integrity' Respect . Quality . --. " .' ¥ FFY 2001 Local Share Byrne Page Two '""'" as well as the agency responsible for such implementation. Developing such consensus will require someone to exercise leadership and assume a coordinating role in the development of applications for these funds. FDLE recommends that the Board of County Commissioners assume this responsibility. In the event the county declines to serve in this capacity, the Department will request the governing body of each municipality in the county, in descending order of population, to serve as the coordinating unit of government. The enclosed Certification of Participation form requests the identification of an individual coordinator. We will send this individual an application kit that will provide the program details necessary for completion of the application. Please complete the enclosed Certificate of Participation and return it within 30 days from the date of this correspondence to: . Florida Department of Law Enforcement Office of Criminal Justice Grants 1819 Miccosukee Commons Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Attention: Beth Hamilton Further, a Statewide Drug Intelligence System will soon be implemented by FDLE. In the near future, we will have an available web site that will provide additional information on this new database and will begin providing training to law enforcement agencies later this spring. We encourage you to become more familiar with this initiative. We anticipate that reporting to this system may become part of the Byrne Program requirements in future years. If you would like additional information on this initiative, please contact Larry Shaw, Investigative Programs, at (850) 410-7073 or Jennifer Cook, Office of Statewide Intelligence, at (850) 410-7072. We look forward to working with you. If you have any questions or if we can provide you with any assistance regarding the Byrne Program, please contact me or Beth Hamilton, Planning Manager, at 850/410-8700. . Sincerely, (Jp~ . ClaYt,ørfH:~d~ Community Program Administrator CHWIBHlmg Enclosures (2) xc: Mayors in St. Lucie County Law Enforcement Agencies in St. Lucie County Project Directors in St. Lucie County Committed to Service' Integrity' Respect· Quality ,. "" ...,; PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT STATE FISCAL YEAR 2002 Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant Program The State of Florida, Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), anticipates an award from the United States Department of Justice for $14,162,217 in Local Share Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant funds. This announcement Is to notify eligible applicants of program requirements. Eliaible ADDlicants Units of local government are eligible to receive subgrants from FDLE. "Units of local government" means any city, county, town, township, borough, parish, village, or other general- purpose political subdivision of a State and includes Native American Tribes that perform law enforcement functions as determined by the Secretary of the Interior. Proaram Strateav and PurDoses Units of local govemment applying for these federal funds must use them to implement projects that offer a high probability of improving the functioning of the criminal justice system, aggressively and effectively responding to violent crime, or reducing drug trafficking and abuse. Projects must comply with the 28 federally authorized program areas and may provide personnel, equipment, direct services, training, technical assistance, and public information. They may include a range of activities including provision of prevention, intervention and enforcement initiatives. The Department strongly discourages local subgrant funding of projects of less than $25,000. Economies of scale often play an important role in whether a project can achieve its targeted objectives. Proaram DeveloDment Each county is allocated a sum of money for use by all local governments within the county. This amount is determined through a funding algorithm established in administrative rule. Chapter 98-61.008, Florida Administrative Code, requires that units of government in each county reach consensus concerning the expenditure of these funds, including the projects to be implemented and the agency responsible for such implementation. Maximum coordination is required to meet this program requirement and the Department requests the county board of commissioners to coordinate requests for all local governments within the county. The Chairman, Board of County Commissioners, in each county so notified is requested to return to the Department a statement of certification indicating the county's willingness to serve as the coordinating unit of government for at least 51 percent of the units of government which also represent at least 51 percent of the population located in said county. Enclosure 1 SFY 2002 Byrne Program Announcement Page 1 ........ ...,¡ This certification must be returned within 30 days from the date of receipt of notification. In the event the county declines to serve in this capacity, the Department will request the governing body of each municipality in the county, in descending order of population, to serve as the coordinating unit of govemment. To accomplish these tasks, the Department encourages each county to appoint a Substance Abuse Policy Advisory Board, the membership of which should include at a minimum the following persons or their authorized designee: Chief Circuit Judge, State Attorney, Public Defender, Sheriff, Chief of Police of each municipality within the county or a Chief of Police designated by those Chiefs of Police as their representative, Jail Administrator, Clerk of the Court, Superintendent of Education and a representative of local drug treatment programs. Each county is also encouraged to designate an Office of Substance Abuse Policy to assist with these tasks. Match Reaulrements Applicants must supply no less than 25 percent of a project's cost in cash from non-federal funds; however, Indian Tribes are exempt from this matching requirement. These matching funds must be funds that would not have been available for reduction of drug trafficking and abuse and violent crime and criminal justice system improvement efforts in the absence of federal funds; that is, they must represent an additional local effort in addressing these problems. Application Reaulrements and Deadlines Chapter 9B-61 , Florida Administrative Code, govems program administration and funding. Local governments should thoroughly review rule provisions before applying for subgrant funds. Once the Certificate of Participation is retumed to the Office of Criminal Justice Grants (OCJG), a copy of the application package will be provided to the ident.ifled County Coordinator. The Department must receive two (2) copies of each application for funding (both with original signatures) must be received by the Department no later than 5:00 P.M.. Tuesdav. June 19. 2001. A separate application must be submitted for each proposed project. Applications should be mailed or hand delivered to the following: Mr. Clayton H. Wilder Community Program Administrator Department of Law Enforcement Office of Criminal Justice Grants 1819 Miccosukee Commons Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Applications must be accompanied by letters of approval representing agreement among at least 51 percent of all units of local govemment representing at least 51 percent of the county population as to the allocation of dollars to each project in the county. Questions regarding this Program Announcement should be directed to Clayton Wilder, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, at 850 /410-8700. Enclosure 1 SFY 2002 Byrne Program Announcement Page 2 "" -..I CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION State Fiscal Year 2002 Date: Mr. Clayton H. Wilder Community Program Administrator Office of Criminal Justice Grants Florida Department of Law Enforcement 1819 Miccosukee Commons Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Dear Mr. Wilder: This is to inform you that the Board of County Commissioners Accepts_ Declines _ the invitation to serve as the coordinating unit of govemment in the Florida Department of Law Enforcement's Edward Byme Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant Program. For purposes of coordinating the preparation of our application(s) for grant funds with the Office of Criminal Justice Grants, we have designated the following person: Name: Title: E-mail address: Agency: Address: Telephone: Date: County: Sincerely, Chair, Board of County Commissioners Enclosure 2 Byrne Grant Program Announcement 1< ¥ ¥ ...." Agenda Request Item Number Date: Q/<g April 1 0, 2001 Consent Regular Public Hearing leg. [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development Director ted By - O'L Development Director BACKGROUND: Oleander Business Park Water Main Project Acceptancé, Release of Retainage, Final Payment in the amount of $93,139.72 and Budget Resolution #01- 89 for the anticipated funds from Fort Pierce Utilities Authority for the water main construction project reiated to the CDBG Oleander Business Park Grant in the amount of $11 ,888. Previously, St. Lucie County applied for and was awarded $480,000 CDBG grant for the development of utility services into the Oleander Business Park. Phase I of this project included the construction of water, sewer and gas tines in the Oleander Business Park area. Extension of these lines to other areas of the Park and surrounding neighborhood will be made as future grant funds permit. The first phase of the project is now complete and the final payment is due to the contractor, Sheltra & Son in the amount of $93,139.72. This amount includes $41 ,816.06 in retainage, and $51,323.66 in grant funds budgeted under the Community Development Department, Economic Development Division, Contractual Services line item. SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: The Fort Pierce Utilities Authority joined SI Lucie County in this project and has previously contributed $150,000 toward their share of construction costs. The County's CDBG Consultant reports the total final cost share requirement of the FPUA is $161,888. The Community Development Department is in the process of collecting the remaining $11,888 from the FPUA. At this time a budget resolution is necessary to increase the overall project budget by the additional $11,888 in order to pay the final invoice to Sheltra & Sons. 001-1515-534000-5001 Contractual Services Oleander Park Water Main 001122-1515-534000-5001 CDBG Grant, Contractual Services On March 24, 1998, the St. Lucie BOCC accepted the CDBG World of Plastics! Oleander Business Park area grant award. On April 21, 1998, St. lucle County BOCC and Fort Pierce Utilities Authority entered into an Interlocal Agreement to cooperate in providing water services to the Oleander Business Park area. The BOCC has previously approved all Change Orders and grant time extension requests submitted by the Consultant, Consulting Engineer, and Contractor. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Budget Resolution #01-89 to appropriate and expend the funds from Fort Pierce Utilities Authority for the construction of new utilities in the Oleander Business Park in the amount of $11 ,888. Staff also recommends the Board accept the project, approve the release of retainage in the amount of $41,816.06 and approve tinal payment to Sheltra & Son in the amount of $93,139.72. The project has received all approvals and Board action will allow for both final payment and grant close out. Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: COMMISSION ACTION: IT] APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER coordinati°fift/:JJhVlqe Mgt. & Budget: . Other: Purchasing: Other: County AttorneY~M Originating Dept.: . Finance: ~ (AGEND549) · '-' -....I RESOLUTION NO. 01- 89 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the SI. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for SI. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available from the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority in the amount of $11 ,888 in form of a cost-sharing of the of water main construction in the Oleander Business Park. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, re.quires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of SI. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this April 1 0, 2001, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2000-2001, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 001-1515-337330-5001 FI. Pierce Utilities Authority $11,888 APPROPRIATIONS 001-1 515-534000-5001 Other Contractual Services $11,888 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2001 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY G:\BUDGE1\WP\AGENDA'S\AgendaOI\Olcander_ Grant.wpd '- ...., MEMORANDUM 7408 Edisto Drive Lake Worth, Florida 33467 NANCY PHILLIPS & ASSOCIATES, L.c. Tel: FAX: 561-432-1524 561-432-6734 February 20,2001 TO: Julia Shewchuk, St. Lucie County Community Development Director FROM: Nancy Phillips, Grants Specialist )) ~ ~ SUBJECT: Contractor FINAL Pay Request - CDBG 99DB-E81 Grant - Oleander Business Park I have reviewed and am approving the above noted pay request in the amount of$93, 138.65. The final contract amount, including Change Order #5, is now $469,469.50 of which $307,581.50 is CDBG and FPUA's portion is $161,888.00. The FINAL pay should be broken down as follows: Work in Place Current Period Total Retainage Due CDBG All items except those listed below $ 31,126.01 $30,758.15 FPUA Items 4.2A, 4.2B, 5.01, 5.0J, 5.0L, 5.0K, 6.1, 10.0, and all of 16.0C-16.0J $ 15,065.69 $16,188.80 Total Due $ 46,191.70 $46,946.95 $93,138.65 Based on the above calculations, the County should charge these amounts b.eforeIeta.iuage as follo~ .om Sf. Lo,;, c.o"~ Pm'","' 0",'" P2012613, ,::-, ~ ,:: ;~ Œ I rn I ·-.·:.~:.~~·~~~~~~dN1 1 '-' ...., CDBG Other Contractual Services, Account/Fund #534000 $31,126.01 FPUA Deduct ITom Leverage Funds $15,065.69 Also, the $31,126.01 for CDBG should be charged to Water Facilities line item. Change Order #5 involves an increase in the CDBG portion of the grant by $3,961.00 for quantities adjustment at closeout and are grant eligible under the Water Facilities line item. Also, this change order amounted to an increase in the FPUA contract portion of$786.00 due to quantities adjustment. Change Order #5 also requests a time extension until August 4, 2000 which was when the system was accepted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The engineer, LBFH, Inc., and I have met with the contractor on several occasions to finalize all final pay request and obtain the paperwork. It has taken this long to complete the paperwork portion of the project. Since the construction was completed on August 4, 2000, all final retainage is now due to be paid to Sheltra Construction as indicated in this FINAL pay request. Also, please note that the FPUA contract amount exceeds the $150,000 leverage funds already on deposit with St. Lucie County. Therefore, the amount of$11,888 should be collected ITom FPUA. All "Release of Liens" for the project have been obtained and are attached. The issue with Communications by Piore has been resolved and a release ftom them is attached. Please contact me if you have any questions and/or comments. Thank you for your assistance with this request. /nsp Attachments c: Melissa Corbett, LBFH Sheltra Construction David Mellert, FPUA C:\MyFiles\StLucie\E81 payreqfinal.wpd I!2£b (t):......,UIl:--:c; CIVIL f,~<.;I,-":[L¡':"'. :<l,.!.:\lYC)f.:S.\ ;\L·\I'I'[I{S CIVIL AGRICULTURM \'\'.~TER RESOURCES \\'.\TER " WASTEWATER TRM,SPORTATION SURVEYING I-- MAPPING GIS "Partners ¡or Results Value by Design" 35;0 S.w. Corporale Pkwy. Palm City, FL 34990 156 t 1286-3883 Fax: 1561) 286·3925 \\"\\,\y,lbih.com '-" ..." February 13, 2001 Julia Shewchuk Community Development Director St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Re: Oleander CD~G - Water and Gas Project Application for Payment #7 - Final Payment LBFH #98-0364 Dear Ms. Shewchuk, I have reviewed Pay Request #7, and approve it in the amount of $93,138.65. The CDBG I FPUA breakdown is as follows: CDBG Costs: FPUA Costs: $58,771.96 $34,366.69 We have attached Change Order #5, which includes the following adjustments: · Two directional bores that were installed, but not referenced on the bid schedule. Minor quantity overruns. Deletion of items that were not installed. A time extension through the date that the project was accepted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. · · · Release of Liens for both of Sheltra's subconsultants are attached. If you have any comments or questions, do not hesitate to call me at (561) 286-3883. I Sincerely, //Ju;-~{I~ Melissa G. Corbett, E.!. Project Engineer attachment cc: - Nancy Phillips Matt Taylor, Sheltra File P:VJ8.0JMWoril Dof."N'ny R~qunl Approl'U/ 7.dot: - Feb-06-01 03: 50P Shelt·-" & Son Canst Co '-' P.03 ~ WAIVER AND R!UASE OF LIEN UPON PROGRESS PAYMENT The ùnderaiqned lienor,in çonsideration of the progress payment in the amount of .~11 'À 'if.:3 ,0 ñ I MIlby ':Ilive! and releases its lien and right to claift a 11en tor l~r,sarvic's or materials furnilhad thrDuqh 12-3J~OO to !culltome~1 ~~~Ji~~ -~~n ~~ú\, Dn the job of !OWI1U! '&:>1.1.. ' J. ßj (', to tha fol1owihq deecribed property: o \e..AP\J-.Qf ~¡..p/'(\AA2 Thi. Waiytr and relea.e does not cover any r.tention of lebor, services, or ..t.ri.li furnished after the date epecified. Dat:íd J -<6-2-.001 , """' ill Lienor's Name ...JiJ1~/\4 Co-'-¡.fV'_< Address Stup .,..;W~'f""'" Alyso A. Comlort f.'f~~;-' MYCOMM~SION' CC911961\ EXPIRES ''.. ;} May26.200~ '~Š¡f:~. " WHtED ntRV TlOY FAIN ~SUiAI'ICE.1NC. 'f ¿~~~' -¿~~~-~,.~ . Q Jr1.n~ "... .- r¡¡( ( thh Q.dlY of ..J , ho,bdng d'Þ\y,~wo~n ón ot~~ (' ~~~.9'~ Mote. TÞi. i. . .t.tutory fo~ pr..cr1bed by Seçtion 113.20. Florida statutes \199SI Effective october 1. 1998, a person Ray not raquite a iienor to furnish I waiver Dr r@l@ase of li@n tha~ is diffe~en~ from th. .tatutory forœ. . '..". Feb-06-01 03:50P Shelt' ~ & Son Canst Ca """ P_02 '""" WAl\18R Am> MLZMI OF LIEN UPON PP.OGRE8S PAYMENT Tbe undèr.ighed lienor, in con~id~ta~1on of tbe progre.s paym~n~ 1n ~h. åIDouot ot ~ :~ J., 'J. g I. e)(), hIItllby Ifslve! and releUes 11:s lien and' tight: tð ël*1K . l1in tor labor..ervlct! or materlals turnishlld through ~3.q·"DO 1:0 Icuøtomer! ~~\t;'~ £= . bit \:hi! job ot lownu I ~t- LtJ.l' . 1- , \:0 the tollowibq déscrlbed property: Q\.p().~_L--Q~ .0 . "~' thlø ~ly'k tnd r.l.... doe. hot co.er tny retent10n ot leborl l't~l~.1 br "titi.l. furnished alter the date specified. I!tttd 9~~ ~f) ~()( \.1!!!J tienor' 8 tlamé Addteu r rYMlY'I'\l rv\ Ù" '" fA f ..,~ ~tº.0~~1 By f:;tp£~~' hlftt kill' ~ 7-Ð12 i 3D day ot .oI..M. ,1BJ Itol being du),y IWO ón oat~1 ia~ /J' __ . . or ~nu<.4""'~ ...;.tø,........:~· .~~Q, () n +- Notary BiqnatUt~ htllo by thit hll/ahe iI "ho 11 peUòitalh bolln to \d. .beron lie thh *1:- .,.'iíi<',"'Iii::, AIyta Þ. Comfort {'fI"!';, MYcQMM!SSlONI CC!09615 roIR'éS Q :.i May 26, 200~ -\!;........W tQtIOEOnltuJlOYFAlMIMIUUJKE.foIC. ''',P.!..f.'.'' ~ol:'l thie it t ttttutory to~ pte.crlbed by ~ection 11j,20. tlótida 8~.~U~èJ·11t'il tfttcti~6 octòbet 1, 199.. . perlon nay not reqUite t liartot ~a futhi*h å kai..t Òt t.l~a" af lieb ~h'~ ii ditfettb~ trod ~h. e~.l:u~brJ !ò~. '-- '-- "'" ...., COMMUNICA nONS BY POIRE 5705 JASON LEE PL 34233 P.O. BOX 37536 MAILING SARASOTA, FL. 34278 941-955-8541 FAX 941-952-9472 INVOICE #SHEL008 DATE: 3-9-00 ." BILL TO: SHELTRA & SONS CONSTRUCT/ON CO. INC. 14911 VAN BUREN STREET INDIANTOWN, FL. 34956 8133-973-1178 FAX 8/3-973-1881 JOB NAME Order number: OLEANDER BUSINESS PARK PHASE I $32.50 $10.00 EXTENDED $23,757.50 $6,110.00 QTY 731 611 UNIT LF LF DESCRIPTION DIRECTIONAL BORE a-INCH DIRECTIONAL BORE 2-INCH PRICE EACH OCATIONS OF 2-INCH 140' FARMER MARKET & OLEANDER, 115' WAGNER & OLEAN 40' OLEANDER & SKYLARK DR.. 216 GRASS ALONG OLEAM OCATIONS OF a-INCH GRASS ALONG 0 EANDER, 140' CROSS SKYLARK LONG OLEANDER, 1 5' ACROSS WAGNER OLEANDER '10' CROSS FARMERS MARKET OLEANDER, ACROSS ENTERPRISE GROSE, CROSS OLEANDER FARMERS MARKET roTA 29867.50 ¿;(uJ- dŒ.lj UY\. d ctb 2/ ;IS-lOG ¥ .,,; COMMUNICATIONS BY POIRE 5705 JASON LEE PLACE 34233 P.O. BOX 37536 MAILING SARASOTA, FL. 34278 941-955-8541 941-952-9472 INVOICE # SHEL007 DATE:DEC.20,1999 . . BILL TO: SHELTRA & SONS CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 14911 VAN BUREN STREET INDIANTOWN,FL 34956 A TTN: RA Y SHEL TRA JOB NAME Order number: OLEANDER BUSINESS PARK' PHASE 1 ERMS NET QTY EXTENDED 120 v' . LF IRECTIONAL BORE 2-INCH #1 $10.00 $1,200.00 125 ./ LF IRECTIONAL BORE 2-INCH #2 $10.00 $1,250.00 125 ,¡ LF DIRECTIONAL BORE 8-INCH #1 $32.50 $4,062.50 57 v LF DIRECTIONAL BORE 8-INCH #2 $32.50 $1,852.50 120 J LF DIRECTIONAL BORE 6-INCH #3 $32.50 $3,900.00 Sub tote/: " LESS RETA/NAG You pay this amount. APPLI~ION FOR ~ AND FINAL PA~NT -_. PROJECT NAME: O.JZII.I\DE.P, t:n~ll)£..¥. 'P~ (' {;C,e:, fW..~; (~)« ___RD ___~__~_IB TONERS ENGINEER I S PROJECT NO.: 9?.J2f;rE,ßi OWNER: B'I'. r,TlCT P. COTlN'I'V. FT,ORTDA CONTRACTOR: (~(4;~,<~ ('-"'U5f'. rt:').~ CONTRACT DATE: _~,?9 APPLICATION AMOUNT: . ~ qAS3+.1~ APPLICATION DATE: <.. v",) 31) ø.l INITIAL CONTRACT AMT. FOR PERIOD ENDING: ----1ht 2:flJ, øø BASED ON EST. QUANTITIES $~~..G~5?\ TABULATION OF AMOUNT DTlE THTB APPLICATION AS APPLIED FOR BY CONTRACTOR AB APPROVED BY ENGINEER ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT COMPLETED TO DATE (See Attached "Estimate of completed work") $~':l=~2J('".~ $1i~)(4r.5o CHANGE ORDER NO. I @ IØØ % COMPLETE (+) $ e.4øø.Øe> $ 2400. rn g~~g~ g::~ ~g:. ~ ~ ~~: gg~~~~~~ ¡~¡ ~ ?~%~:~ ~ ~6~.·~ CHANGE ORDER NO. @ % COMPLETE (+)$ $ PREVIOUS PAYMENTB: TOTAL WORK TO. DATE (+) $ 4~PJG,4.~Q'\ $ 4{PQAfDCJ.'.X n $IQÔ~~.mJ,. LESS PREVIOUS PAY. (-) $$ ~~~~;r::~ $- ~~.e #2 $ Co"1-ð-=klJ.1:.<} SUB-TOTAL ____ ___ $ a.~ 1~.05 i3 $ é~ III. IG:. LESS FAILED LAB. TESTS (-) $ #4 $ 42..'í15.+F. /3Q12- TOTAL $ <~-;¡;c.O.~ê.9.:1ß AMOUNT DUE FINAL PAYMENT, EXCEPT FOR ANY cr 3¡ /. ..,5 5'l>Ø0'Ç.. ê.'=1 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ASSESSED BY BOARD ~113B,b5 ~G, ~3~. E.o<:\ 'fÏ ¡.)Q \ ?o.~ ¡\w..ou~+ Ot..- '~\'Ir-. ~M \ The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that all obligations incurred by the Contractor under this Contract to date have been discharged in full; that no suits are pending in connection with the work under the Contract; that the Contractor agrees to the total final price of $.1-'H8<D4.SØ and final payment of $ q~5.34-.?='ê.. as full settlement of his account under the Contract and of all claims in connection therewith. , CONTRACTOR (t) ,{F~ (,~ ('.i'>l~~ ('1"'1, I"'C... , - BY Þ \ TITLE~c.,. CONTRAÇTOR'S AFFIDAVIT COUNTY OF -jí)p,,"··h 'Ì STATE OF ¡:::'\oe,d,o... "" ...." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. t A A TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: Aprill", 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT (x) PRESENTED BY: Roqer Shinn SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Central Services SUBJECT: Bid #01-015 - Replace Intercom System - Rock Road Jail BACKGROUND: The County went to bid to replace the intercom system at Rock Road Jail. Two(2) bids were received. Both bids were for primary work to be done and were over-budget. After researching various methods of systems, staff would like to reject all bids and re-bid project. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUND AVAIL.: 316-1940-546200-1527 - Jail Maintenance Improvements RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve rejecting bids and re-bidding the intercom system using alternative systems that are within budget. x] APPROVED ] OTHER: DENIED nderson Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Atty: (x) vy Purchasing: () J(~ i' Review and Approva144~ Management & Budget: (x) ~ Origin. Dept: () Other: () ~ Eff. 6/3/96 '. ¥ ..., MEMORANDUM CENTRAL SERVICES TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Roger A. Shinn, Director, Central Services DATE: April 4, 2001 SUBJECT: AGENDA REQUEST Rejection of Bid #01-015-Replace Intercom System - Rock Road Jail -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: The County obtained bids to replace the intercom system at Rock Road Jail. Two(2) bids were received. It was found that both bids were for the primary work done and were over-budget. After researching various methods of systems, staff would like to re-bid this project. RECOMMENDA nON: Staff is recommending the Board approve rejecting both bids and re-bidding the intercom system using alternative systems that are within budget. ~ {;- Jf R GERA.SHINN RAS:bk aU. . n . 2 2 2 ~ 'tI c: c: c: m 3: 3: 3: i ,;¡ III III III C m m m 6 m ,;¡ ,;¡ ,;¡ ;: 3: 0 0 0 m :Þ 'T1 'T1 'T1 ~ 2 III !!! n ~ c c rn 6 c 0 );! rn c 3: ¡tI ,;¡ 0 ~ m n 2 n n c: 0 m 3: ¡:¡; 3: ~ m rn 2 2 !;' ¡¡j 0 ::! c 'T1 ¡¡; ¡:¡; -i ~ ,;¡ ãi c: -i m ~ ~ ~ t: g ...... ¡;> ;t!en < ~en :EO m _~ en ~c: z 'T1m Jl -I C ....-1 'T1:J: 0 en ....m m ;:u ::0 0 Z en c: en ;:u m - 0 ~ c: en ;:u - -< ~ en -f en m -< s: en en -I ~ m - Z s: 0 en . m > m I» - I» fI S' fI CD ~ CD .. ::I .. I» S' " m - .,. .,. .,. C .þ. II.) .þ. cø CCI Co) ~ ~ cø ~ .þ. ...... CO II.) 01 0 U'I 0 . . 0 . 0 Q 0 Q 0 "'" OO:;:C "'Omm mz"'O Z-l!; ~~o "ïm en- c..mZ >;:u-l Z<~ c:-...... >00 ;:u enm ~ -< ::l1li ...,¡. en ...... -< ~ en II.) -f o m ~ s: (§ :;:c o ° " :;:c o > c (.. > - ï ...,¡. ...,¡. " o o > . s: . m o > ;:u mC -0 C'T1en -10-1 m>o;'- _mc:c: CC:ZO ~ï-l_ o>~m ...,¡.-I '-0° 0000 ~Zs:c: ens:z :J:_-I men-< men -1- o Z m ~ ¥ '-' AGENDA REQUEST DATE: April 10, 2001 ITEM NO. C-9B REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT (x ) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Roger A. Shinn SUBMITTED BY(DEPT) Central Services SUBJECT: Reallocation of Funds BACKGROUND: Light poles are needed at the Smithsonian Institute. Staff has money in the Maintenance Projects - Agricultural Center paint project, since the project did not cost the entire amount budgeted, and staff would like to reallocate this money into the Smithsonian account. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUND AVAIL.: 316-1931-546200-1534- Main. Projects Ag. Center (From) 316-1930-562000-76007 - Smithsonian Bldg. (To) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve reallocation $13,550. from the Main. Projects - Ag. Center account to the Smithsonian Building account to install light poles. [ I [ x] APPROVED DENIED OTHER: Pulled prior to meeting. Anderson y Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: $'£ County Atty: () Purchas ing: () .£ ' -¡-;- . Review and A'DDroval rr1:l1 Managemen t & Budge t : () fI/.D fh Origin. Dept: () Other: () Eff, 6/3/96 ¥ ....., MEMORANDUM CENTRAL SERVICES TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Roger A. Shinn, Director, Central Services DATE: April 4, 2001 SUBJECT: AGENDA REQUEST Reallocation of Fnnds ---- BACKGROUND: Light poles are needed at the Smithsonian Institute. Staff would like to reallocate the money from the Agricultural Center - Maintenance Projects into the Smithsonian account. We had originally budgeted $20,000. to paint the Agricultural Center, however, the cost to do this project was only $6,450. We have $13,550 to reallocate into the Smithsonian account. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the Board approve the reallocation of funds in the amount of $13,550 from the Agricultural Center - Maintenance Projects into the Smithsonian Building account. ~c. a~. . RO ER A.SHINN RAS:bk aU. '"'" -...,I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO [I. - \ 0 Regular Public Hearing Consent (-J (_J (-0 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson SUBJECT: Art in Public Places Art & Design Committee Appointment BACKGROUND: FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Ratify Commissioner Hutchinson's appointment of Robbin C. Lynch to the Art in Public Places Art & Design Committee. COMMISSION ACTION: ( x) APPROVED ( ) DENIED ( ) OTHER REVIEW AND APPROVAL: County Attorney Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Department Other Other Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) ~·I. L'_"_lL ,~U. 1'\IIUr.HLI ¡ ,)" '_".'1 :".'_ l'I':"!',' ut ~ -, .'. Á~'·_·_' 1.'·_'... ¥ ...., ST. LUCu.-: COUNTY CtlLTUIlAL AFFAW.s COUNCIL AU'l' PUBLIC AltT & DESIGN COMMITTIŒ Al'PLICATION "ST. LUCIE COUNTY IŒSlDENCY REQtJIIŒDH NAME:]<obbìr"l c.. L'1nch ADDRESS;Z-505~o(+h \Yì-Ó}L\tl~ Del\Ì.e, s,-. Lucie vi UJL~ 3<t9Lfb TELI.:r)IIONI~NUMnERS:5J2.L-t..fk'$ -g74t/ __(IIOME) . UUSINESSAFFILl.ATION:~n\J<;,e rAJ', t£.-'----.---. ..----- (WORK) .__.._-_.-...__..~.. ---- CUL TUltALAFFILIATlON(S):~±-..A.. E ""6 PJJn I. Bac-k..us ~ ) -- -~.-;;:;:'-- j ARTS EXP¡':RTISEIUACKGROUND:]:>. r>.Ç 1='ìr\e Ad.. '\ (\ C~I q n ~ ~2 1/~c;f "Dì(ed"or o-t' .AJ;,. ,\'B~~'" ~/1.\ky-'1- ~'2.~~o.rs.. ~ph(W/ ~+iC;1-~ot.IJU..L.- 3y.eAYs. PLEASE INDICATE ANY OTHER I'ERTJN¡~NTlN1¡ORMATION: j .._n~__ ________._u__ ST. LUCIE COUNTY CULTURAL AFFAlRS COUNCIL 2300 Virginia Avclluc, Administration Anncx Forll'icrcc, Fludd ( 34932 ..--/ DATE RECEIVED: ~)d/(; .' ,,<-"-. @iane !lIr~er . Art!;, ~blicElaces PUbliCA;¡~ndDë~ign_C~rT1it~e APp()¡;:;tme-;;¡-=--=-=:-- -- - - ---"'age 11 ¥ ...., ------------ From: To: Date: Subject: Liz Martin Diane Turner 4/4/012:10PM Art in Public Places Public Art and Design Committee Appointment Hi Diane, Pi ease place an item on next weeks consent agenda to ratify Commissioner Hutchinson's appointment of Robbin C. Lynch to the above committee. I'll send an agenda request over as soon as I can get it prepared. Thanks, ./ ~ "". AGENDA REQUEST ¥ ITEM NO. c.. - I \ DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Dennis Wetzel, Director SUBMITTED BY<DEPT): Information Technology SUBJECT: Approve Presidio Corporation to provide consulting services under the State of Florida (Snaps) agreement to assist the county in further defining the scope of work necessary for the vendors to tailor their responses to the Communications RFP. The main goal of this service is to provide a current state of the county communications network and the creation of a very detailed "Network Assessment" report. BACKGROUND: The Presidio Corporation will provide SI. Lucie County with a complete understanding of how the existing Telephony, Data and Video communication systems are configured. During this process they will ascertain the future requirements of agencies that will participate in the county plan. Once the needs have been clearly defined, Presidio will create the best technological and financial plan for the county utilizing both existing resources and solutions from the leading providers. FUNDS AVAIL: The fund are available in the general fund: Total Assessment Service Costs are $22,500.00. Funds will be made available in 001-1900-531000-100. PREVIOUS ACTION: The need for this item was presented to the Board of County Commissioners at the Strategic Planning workshop held recently at the Environment Learning Center. The Commissioners have requested staff readdress this item in a timely manner. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve staff to enter into an agreement with Presidio Corporation with reference to the attached proposal and approve Budget Amendment 01-137. COMMISSION ACTION: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Review and ADDrovals County Attorney: ::::!: OS I't Management & BUdge~ ~8ff Originating Dept:1. ~ Other: Purchasing: /hl- Other: '\,;GET AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR~ REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMB/lnformation Technoloç¡y PREPARED DATE: AGENDA DATE: 04/09/01 04/10/01 d' - '- , - " .- " - " _ __ -,'hì:.._ _ ·~~~.:í=l!J~_' ,' .Il~ :~~- __ ~- -~ ---~ ~_.- "(.::J.:~::'~b~;. ~ ~M:_ _____~~_,......:. ~ _ _~·!M~d~ TO: 001-1900-531000-100 Professional Services $22.500 FROM: 001-9910-599100-800 Contingency . $22,500 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: To fund consultinç¡ service for County communications needs. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: $685.891 THIS AMENDMENT: $22.500 REMAINING BALANCE: $663.391 Ç/ L/ ~ DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: ./ ..Jo-? /' OMB APPROVAL: 0 BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 01-137 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: G:IBUDGETìQUA TTROIGENERALIFORMSIAMENDM01.wb3 FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 F&..".oS APPROVED FROM CONTINGEN..J GENERAL FUND AMOUNT REMAINING: $663,391 DEPARTMENT ITEM ACCOUNT # AMOUNT Approved Budget Contingency 001-9910-599100-800 1,000,000 Administration Community Redevelopment Agency 001-1900-581085-100 75.000 Public Works Rock Road Chapel 001-1900-562011-16002 1,082 Central Services Smithsonian (Loans to fund 316) 001-1930-562000-76007 200,000 Veteran Services Van Loan for Veteran Services 001-5310-564000-500 22.079 Information Technology Balance due to Kronos (time clocks) 001-1900-531000-1919 11,279 Information Technology Consuiting on Communications needs 001-1900-531000-100 Total used: Balance Available 309,440 690,560 Proposed action: Postage Machine for Mail Room / HR Consulting on Communications needs 001-1900-531000-100 4,669 $22.500 Balance Available After Proposed Action: 663,391 G:IBUDGET\QUA TTROIGENERALIFORMS\AMENDM01.wb3 DATE 09/12 10/03 11/08 01/16 03/13 04/10 04/10 --., . -..~ r~ g..c:: '-' """ A Proposal For: Sf. Lucie County Telephony / Data / Voice Network Assessment Submitted by: Duane KJncus ~~- The Presidio Corporation 51OO-J Philadelphia Way Lanham, MD 20706 (800) 452-6926 x3563 }1tto:l/WWW-Dresi4io.com .'Io.a......" ._.~ ........... g.,;, SW""' ;.~J0n""_" ' COU fJI Y ¥ ""'" CJ - ¡. ,", Overview Tœ followiD¡ St...~ ofWorlt is for on-site Asse.....lIt Services. We a,ppreci.aæ the opportunity to ~rk closely with )'Ou and your team to reach )'0\11' abort and kmg-tcnn network goals. At The Presidio Cotporation. our COJlI.hÌl....d Ì8 to Iœet your rcquiremems on time. on IIOOpC and on budget. Ollr goal .. to eo..pllmeat roer .taft "Itla ou... to neelt a COtnMOll I_L The Presidio Corporation The Presidio COrpol'8tion has been in business since 1986, and has experienced pbenomeruù growth 0__ the last 6 yeøn by fM....w.g on the quality of set"Y:Ice. provided to our clients. Our cng.ineerin¡ team is skilled in tbe mult-vendor approach to design, .intcgrationand support of eotcrpdse .networks. Presidio headquarters is located in Lanham, MD IIJId qœlifiea for Women Owned bulÙlCSI statu&. Within the state of Florida we currently maiDtam a staff of33 with Ova' 70% being engineeB. We have qualified fur state œDtract sales and service with the major lIIIIIII1f8ctur inoluding Ciac:o. Nonel and Marconi. We ha'Ye served t!IIiI neccb of customm as large as the US Treasury and as small as the Martin County School District, all the while 1òcusing on providing the bi¡bcst levels of customer satisf'açrion. Scope of Work Tbc rollcnrial proced_m ,,10 be Geeuteet to provide Sf. Ùlcie COUDty wftb . compJece uudentaudlDt of bow tile e...iatia, TeJepltOIlJ. DaD alld Video co..m1lDieatioa system. are coaflpred. Durfaa thiI proeeu "e will attempt to asc:ertaút tile r.ture nqulrelneaà of a.... dI.t WØI parcidpate ID tile CG1mty pi.... o.ce die Deeds ".ft beea dearly deßaed ". wW auempt to create die b_t tedtaøloaical ød ftaalld8l plan lor die C08IIt)r adlbll., botIJ aIIUat raeucallDd aølutiou fro. ~.a_1 provfde.... Data I Video Elements Cn,tomer Iatervi_ Network EÐgineeto will conduct an interview to create a praK.1I1 picture of customer's network. Relevant topks are network topology JIDd numberins. physical conœctivity, protocols, network equipmenr: brands and models, server types, and app1icatioos used. PIapr1ecuy lad ConIkImda1 03/1<1101 --. . -- ........... t(J.t...K~ ,...A\:It:. 84 """ ,'~II _3J ;. - ,-~.. .. ~~ 1.1 ¡t..'t, laf'oraaal Site SUrvey aad Data GatheriDg An ÌD1brmal site survey should be conducted. All MDF Con¡plter rooms and IDFs should be visited and doCUl:œDtcd. In """i.tioD any remote sites that play a role in thCI techooJogy plan. If the site requirements are minimal thCI infb.l'Dllltion may be gathered -verbally or iiomexistiu¡ d~D. The tòllowing is tbe site survey dnno'nvont tòrmat: · A Ceoeral View oftll. Detworlt · Physical View ofpreseat .tCWork Customer's doc:umemation Main IDF or Computer Room to IDF Connectivity · Logical View Network Number:Ina Network protocols Topolo¡y · Computer RooJIU aDd Data CloIeb Equipment brands and models Physical colU1eCtivity Main serveB and applications Network A_lmeat report creation The main ¡oal of this ICI'VÌçc is to provide a CUlrCIIt state of CWItOmer'.s DCtwœt: aad tbe c.rcaûon of a 'Yery .......;"'" "Network Aw~ ·..IIt" Report. The report rou...... is as folloW$: · EIeeadve OvenrÎfll' Customer's general infurmation Propricauy aad(' ..~ 2 03/14101 ........-;;¡o...&.~ ,,~U<~ ~AGE 85 '-" ""'" '~I~ :t~ Â.' : '-L- .... I.....', · Preseut Network Ovel'Yiew Network Overview Physical Network Layout Logic:alNetworkLayout · Major Fiadinll 0eœra1 Status oftbe network Network desígn issues Customer's Issues · RecomœeødatiODS aad Coactalions G«I.erall'CÇ()tIllDendations Network design improvancnt8 Customer's DCtWOrIc. desl¡n issues 1be Voice Nehvork Âlleumeat wilt focus on two eateaorles of the çoanty's voice COaI..aleadoDS topoloþ. LoeaI/leq dlatatace IeI'Viees .ad I)'Iteat eqaipmeGt. Network Evaluooø: Presidio will invcntory the CeIlfnDl: lines that are subscribed by St. Lucie County. Here, we'll be vcri1ÿin¡ current billings versus less expensive tariff optioas and I\'IIlri"l rccommcl1dations. 1'he bn¡ ði-....... billing will be evaluated and we will make l'4II:ommeodatioDS on how to reduce costs. Wc will also propose 81'1 ovcra.U technology plan util;"';..., standax'ds based SOlutioDS to provide advanced serviccs throughout the user community. Cellular Se",-: Presidio will review the current ~ ~ and billing infurrnation fur cclluJar voice lc:I'Viccs being provided to county empbyces. We will evaluate that data a¡1IÍIUIt current offerings 1Ï'om the m&Uof service providers that haw coœplete co\'t!r8gC in the coUDty. We wiD also review the c:urrent plan and determine if private CDMA service is 81'1 option to reduce costs I1D.d increase service. If service changes are in order we will provide a clear recomnr.endation to the county. Sywtems ID.veD.tory: Presidio will evaluate the county's communications equipment to detenmnø which compoœnt8 willlleed to be upgraded OJ'replaced with .œwcr tec:hnology. Furthmmore, the telephony ",se'"""Wrlt will evalUBte what actioœ" itany, will need to be taken to. enhance, consolidate and. unifY the CC)wty's communicatioDS network by us~ J'·~ieb..7 .. a...ø.....llaI 3 03/t.elO¡ --...... .~... .........". .,..""" '--1'''''''''' r-.;&;. 'till:) ~ ~ the fo1Jo~ three criteria; teclmology, opemjon and ftœnce. These c:ritA!ria ~ dim"""" as fulIows; Tedla0lotD': What vok:e technologies arc avall..hJA fOr use in St. Lucie CoUDty's 1hture vok:e œtwork plans? Determining whether VoIPNoFR bu a fit in the county's netwodc co.u1i¡uration win be one oftbe technological studies. Operation: The Cumml: cc¡uipment and network con1i¡urstionø that can function in St. Lucie Cowtty's plans. ~ns on systems that will Deed enbanoemeuts or may need. to be replaced. Presidio will attempt to include requests fOr a specific service that may not exist today but may pro~ valuable to the county in the future. FI...ee: The eçonomicaI advantages ofretaiDin¡ or chaø¡ing the current systems or nctwodc &cilities in St. Lucie County. Ddemúning ifl!ldividuaI Case Base (lCB) tariffi¡ can be used to reduce cost. The following Is a lIet of requlrem.nta P....ldlo need. from 8t Lucie County prior to the Network As....m.nt commencement. · Customer Service Record (CSR) Iiom Bell South (3 consecuti~ months). · In~ntory of voice equipment located lit St. Lucie County offices. Voice equipmcm such as Kay SystcJDS. P-1IetS lIIJdIor PBXs. · Current maintenance cont.racl.s for any commWlica1ions hardware. " Letter of Agency for both l.oça1and long distance VCtIdors. · A complete list of aU agencies and sites that need to be included in the plan. · Feedback Iiom each agencies on DeW app1icatiom that may be incorporated. over the next 4 years · In1brma1ion ",pding any CDPD deployments within the COUIIty. (if they exist)Fire, Pollee, Public Services Etc. · Physical structure and gcographic infunnation pertaining to the tallest structw'es in the county. The same infunnation fur any communications towers within the county. (owned, leased, right of way) · The loan of a comfortable chair and a huge cup of coffee. ProprI.œy me! r"ftfldonrlAl 4 03/14/01 f"'II::.Ll;"r\,~~ 1"A!òE 87 ...", gnD .." "" . . . Jf-:'_,..!..:¡,', TIŒ VALUE PROPOSITION » Doterminc and address lolli-term trends so you can ÍIl'\1:st wisely and a\l()Jd IIn......._.~ purçhøes. » VeritY that tùturc requirements will have sufficient resources. » Ma.nm;",'i\ your existins invelltmeDt. » Analyze symptoms and identify potential trouble spots. .. Reduced usee and manaaement complaints. » Shift ftom reactive to proactive management. » Provide a clear coœíae report that identifies the technical RIIpeCtI of an enterprise network and will relate them to the organizational goals. Pricing lløsølUCtl Prb Tt1tøI Senior Ntttwork Engineer Data I Video Network Project Based Âuøssment Sm10r TdttCo"''''lmicatûm.J Telephone Nøtwork Project Based Engilt_ ÂSSU.mNnt I A. s Total A.ssessmønt Sørvices $12,500 I Tariff Bill-back $U'lÞlCø fu &. NoIe Notc; Upon initial review of previous biIIina Ât~\I. we beJHm, that you may have been o~-çharged for !!Orne services. This proc=eu will require a complete review of all billing documents as they apply to existing tariftillIld is ÏlK!ÞIded. in tIùs .,....,9Dlent. Propciclo.~ IIId CoIIIkknûaJ s 03/14101 rc~""" ..,...,.........., ï~ gc::l SOì'"'!o"'@n....·. COUNTY , ~ -.- ...", ~ Unless otherwise stated Pre$idio will attempt to re-coupe those costs as 110 aaaø oftbe county. The Sbmdard tèe fur this øervice i. 2S % or1he ~t negociated with tbe carriers. In ma.y cua this fee ..ay a'" be rolled baek into future JI1'Ojects for "blda tile dleDt 1risba to adIin Praidie ........ No BßI...It8Ck &er'rice lee wtII apply if Presidio II allable to l'e-COape a beIIeßt tor eoaøty. Tho informatiau cautained horoin I' deaI ned .. . r.pÐIIN to tho 1ntI..... btÎlIQ of I'eC IIÛ'OInaIt Idcmi1ie4 10 The Presidio Corporation. Should any diK\ ___-¡. 10 those requÎnlmClftIs arIao, or modifications are maœ" The Preaiclio COI'pOn I/oa raervee the r/abt 10 mødüjr ils propoa1. The dIIa in thia ........-1 àU not be dlaclOIIId outside JIUUI' <IrpIlÌZlllioa IIId IhaII not be dupliClted, uaed or dI~I^""'CI, In whole err in put, tòr any IUIJ>OMa otlMr 1Mn to -1- tho 1-..,..-1, JI'OYided that it. _ i. awanlecl to The Pres.iclio Corporation as a result 0( 01' in çomection witIt lit. sublniaion of this proposal, The Presidio Carponrion àU haw the rIaht to dup!iCM., IØe or _10lIO the data 10 the _ provided by the cœtrIId. This l'eltriction does not limit your right 10 UIO Intbnnllion amiIIinod in the proposal if it is obtained &om ...oth... source witbout restrioâon. Thi, propaealllld the priclDa outlined henin, it œly valid when purdlucd as cIdaiIed in this pI'OpOll8L Any redu«ion 0( scope, 01' ad.iumnClftt 10 qll8lltltJes undfr ccmsicleratiOrJ, may result In applicable !I'OpOù1 revisi....... ~,. and COIItIdaIdaI IS 03/14101 Vw{ ¡;.:tJf-"~~U. .LQ; J.~ :Io:::J..-r;.J;.J-:;J".J,.,L. ............-., .---..........---. ,--.- V~ Date: '-" ..., The Presidio Corporation Eugiaeerlng Services Group Peñormance Summ8J')' Project Number: Cuetomer Int'onna1lon Pboœ: Fax: Name: ~: E-mail: A.ccepttmce of Scope The undersigDed a¡;rt'Jft to the services. coDditious IIDd priciDg indicated in the supplied Scope ofWor:k. Tbe undersì¡ned aI80 agrees to make payment 1br NIid aerviceø to the Praidio Corpo..4iol1 within 30 days o{receiviDa an invoice. Customw Rep,...n6rfM It8me Complete 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. os.. SlOW ...lIIn _pOion .tll___ Dab! TbMIa 'IbM 01lt 1--1 COlltpletlon Final 0 Partial 0 PrMldlo Engtneer Cu.toIner ~....tatlv. ¡l.N"C:~~. Detailed Ccnftsumion Tn1brmálort 0 TeoIIAnalysla R.eaulta 0 NdWOrk Diaaram 0 ........u ...........-,;.1;",1-............ . --......... .---..........., ............ ~~ ...... ...." '-" " ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 4 District 5 AGENDA April 10, 2001 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held March 27,2001. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants list No. 26 and No. 27 2. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Resolution No. 01-01 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution appropriating additional funds from the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Conceptual Approval Agreement for the Pepper Addition land purchase in the amount of $40,766. NOTICE: All proceedings before tbis Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken hy the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim r«ord ofthe proceedings is made. Upon the reqnest ofany party to the proceedings, individnals testifying during a hearing will he sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will he granted an opportunity to cross-examine any Individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting shou]d contact the St. Lucie County Commuriity Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (56t) 462-1428 at leastforty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ¥ 'WI ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn Doug Coward District 1 District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 4 District 5 AGENDA April 10, 2001 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held March 27,2001. Apprô tfc¿J 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA roJJ- W\ì 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 26 and No. 27 2. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Resolution No. 01-01 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution appropriating additional funds from the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Conceptual Approval Agreement for the Pepper Addition land purchase in the amount of $40,766. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will Deed a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the reqnest of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a bearing will be sworn In. Any party to the proceedings will be granted au opportunIty to cross-examine any Individual testifying dnring a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County CommuDity Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) bours prior to the meeting. "" """ 04/09/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA PAGE 1 F7.ABWARR WARRANT LIST #27- 31-MAR-2001 TO 06-APR-2001 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 145 Mosquito Fund 14,285.70 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 14,285.70 0.00 ""'" ..." 03/30/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #26- 24-MAR-2001 TO 30-MAR-2001 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND TITLE EXPENSES 145 Mosquito Fund 12,692.04 GRAND TOTAL: 12,692.04 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 22,146.05 22,146.05 1 """ AGENDA REQUEST ,.., ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: April 10, 2001 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District Board SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Marie M. Gouin SUBJECT: Approval of Budget Resolution 01-01 appropriating additional funds from the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) for the Pepper Addition land purchase in the amount of $40,766. BACKGROUND: On March 16, 2001 FCr granted an extension to the Conceptual Approval Agreement regarding the acquisition of Pepper Park Addition. 51. Lucie County will have an opportunity to finalize additional parcel purchases through August 28, 2001 and potentially expend up to the total of $490,220 in this fiscal year. Due to the fact that the anticipated expenditures for this fiscal year were budgeted at a $449,454 level, we need to increase the grant project budget by an additional $40,766. FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE: 145201-6230-561000-465015 Pepper Park Addition Land Acquisition PREVIOUS ACTION: St. Lucie County Mosquito Control Board accepted the Fcr Pepper Park Addition Grant allowing up to $550,000 for land acquisitions on September 12, 2000. In addition, the Mosquito District spent $50,000 local match for this project. Out of the potential $600,000 total project cost, $109,780 was spent in FY01. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mosquito Control District Board adopt Resolution 01-01 appropriating the additional funds from the Fcr Conceptual Approval Agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: // [XJ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ou Anderson County Administrator ()¡/ Coordination/Sianatures Coo", A"m~æ ~ ","'gem,", & ',dg'" xxr JJI¡ ~ P,ch,,;o, Originating Dept: XX Pubiic Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if appiicabie) XX G:\BUDGE1\ WP\AGE:.'\JDA'S\AgendaO 1 \4'10 :\[s~ Grant wpd """ ...., RESOLUTION NO. 01-01 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the SI. Lucie County Mosquito Control District Board budget, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available in a form of a $40,766 additional reimbursement from Florida Communities Trust for the anticipated acquisition of the Pepper Park Addition. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of the SI. Lucie County Mosquito Control District Board to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mosquito Control District Board of SI. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 10th April, 200, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2000-01, and the Authority's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 145201-6230-334393-46501 5 FCT-Florida Communities Trust $40,766 APPROPRIATIONS 145201-6230-561000-465015 Land $40,766 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 1 OT" DAY OF APRIL, 2001. ATTEST: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY G:\BUDGEl'.WP\AGENDA'SlAgendaO 1 \4'1 0 Ms~ Grant v.1Jd .i ~ -. -...... ~s.::o:;.r...::·~--· ....._~, r ~'ANA"'~~~¿i'''' 0:'", ,~"".,. ~ . 1If-A l.:; ,1>;..'-" '......:. :- ...: ! . ¡ . \.\_25m, 1 , I ~~.."a~~;.,:¡ rt'-'~ . - - ... ........\1-...... S't WCb CQ!.,b-i'iY I"'L;...:\"\,:...~.. __. ~- '"" _ ~~~ L--1 ,.--.~,~1...~/ .~.~.~/ ~ -." 72:~?--.. -' ~"'-' ~"-r:..__ ~,: """..... ~-., . ,_.;r·\'-;::r'..(~..Y\ ·'·~,."'l ,.<~\; '~::'~, ..~~b· :-~ ~~'--~~ -~-~~..-. ............~~ ~~:~-;¡f..:-,-.:_......_~. ...., ~ .~/ ~ :';;'"" .i:.V Pi .. ~.1_ (L" .. .... ~ ..." _~ ..!.. ...'Ùr1<G.d ,OnuJD.UlD.lt1eð '"""" 'I ; ..L Jr1I~slt ',~.,,' RECEIVED March ì 5, 200 i 1 í ¡ , M<m 2;7 2f'JÛi r f , 1 ¡ ¡ MQS uno CONTROd Mr, ü:¡niei McIntyre County Attorney 2Zœ V1rglnla Avenue Fort P!erC$, FlQrlda 34962 RE: . FCT Prola<:t Numb@r: 99.oo1.¡o9A St Lucie CðUlltÿ Feppof Ferll Add!tJan o.;a,- Mr. Mcintyre: enClosed pjean find a fully """o.lled original of t!1e Addendum !I to Ccnc...-pil./al A.pprovaJ Agreeme!'\! /or !Me above- referenced Florida Communit!e$ T!1.I$! Proj<Jct. If yet; n<we any QUestions, please oontact me ¡¡t (850) 922-220ì (SunCom 292-2207). Sincerely, 4.:.1 . ~,- Bry~" Wirick Grants Specialist V bw Enc!Qsurea ''Ì - :.k':' '1', ,...- ~\P ,wIo"" !J.'f'\' en {Î \.,J /' Y-Y(", I"r.... '. ",i,).-l ~VI L'·., ..,. Ç'II' . "", \ ,., ,~, 1 . 'I. ..( ..\j;.~ 'r'-#"" ~, ~ '!i ",', . .' ."1 ,.,J t. ¡ f \ \ .~ ~ OE~rn'¡:EN" OP O:'t-l.'4UNJr{ t...tt......1J!:; .. 2~5S. Stlt:1wl.;"RD O."t.¡.{ [).QU~VA;U; .. T:..:...:....HL->3iE?. fL 323~"..21CQ J350i922-2207 .. SuNCa.... 2'92..2207 . F~\." 3~Oi921-P47 ~~ !'!.~.......r'_..._T....".2.l'''''''.n '-' ..."., _4. Contract No: OO·CT-9V-99-9A-A!-OOl Fer Project No: 99.cD H'9A FCT Project N3lr~: P~pp~r Park Addition ADDS'{DUM 2 TO CONcl:.rT"J'PI.L APPROVAL AGREi::,\fE1>tT T!lÏ$ ADDENDt.rM 2 to the Conc~pt',Ja! Approval Agreement is ~ntereà i¡¡to by and bCf'.veen the FI.ORlDA COIYß.-rUl'-~l! ~S TRUST (FCT), ;1 ¡¡olJIegulatory agency within the State ofFIorida Department of Co=unlf'¡ .Au"fairs. and ST. LUCIE COúj\ TY (ReCipient), ct1i.s //" do day of ,<ITA,-£' ¿q . 20Q!, WHEREAS, thc pa."ti~ hereto entered into a Concept',,¡a! Approval Agreement $l;tûng fort!:! the conditions of <.:cnc:=ptnai "pprcva! ilia, mus, be sa!ist:ed by R~ipíent prior to the disburoement of ti'.e F1..-r Preservation 1000 award a."1d the rcstrictiO!l$ that are imposed. on the project site ~ubsequent to it> acquisitípn; WHEREAS, the t.:= of the Conceptu:l Approval A¡re:rnem expires FebroaIy 28,2001; WHERE.....S, the Recipient in accordan¡;e with GE1"jERAL CONDmONS paragraph 3 of the Conœptual Approval Agr<=ement a.ud in compliance with Rule 9K-4.Q 1 O(2)(j), F ~_C., ~ timely subrn;tted to FCT a written request for eXt~sion of the Febro~7 28, 200 ¡ expi"'atÍcn date; ".'V1-:::EREAs, GENERAL CONDIDONS para¡raph 14 of the CQucepo,¡¡Ù App!ova! Agreement Stales that the agre:ment !n4Y be amended at any time prior to FCT giving .fuu¡ project plan approval to the Recipient. Any agreement must be set forth ín a writteI1 ins1r.uncnt md agreed ~o by both the Recipient ~d PeT; W1-o:::EREAS. the parti~ hereto de!Ú'e to extend the :elm of the Conceptual Approval Agreement á.s provided by Rule 9K-4,Ol0(2)U), FAC.: NOW THEREFORE, the PCT .and RECIPIENT mutually agree as foliows: 1. Notwithstandin¡ :he ]anguage of Secdon L GE."<'ERAL CO};'DITrONS, pa;;¡¡graph 3. ¡¡nd pangnph4., the p3.-ties !JeR¡by agree to revive it nlUlC pro tunc as thOU¡¡ ¡ it had not 14psed in accordance with pa.-agr¡¡ph 3. ., In evuy respect, this amendment is to be construed and applied as thougà the parties bad both sign,ro it before February 28, 2001. 3. Thl!! Conccpt.zal Approval Agreement by and between FCT and Recipient i.> hereby exten~ until August 28, 2001. ADO ~g...r"'",Q1-P5A O~Si200' Page 1 '-' ....", The è.a[~ of oxecur1iJrl of this add;:ndum shall be th:: Qrf: tha.t the la.st Carry signs this a.d~~ndum. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the p>lrÜes here:o have duly executed ¡his ADDE.\;DfJM 2 TO CONCEPTUAL AFFROY AL AGR~¡:""Œ:."iT. ST. LUC)COTJNTY /'\ 4/7?ž. / / I , /!//Ø~'ft<"'? / . ""//U By: V '0 I " '\ P· ",'¿-.! i"f F ""7¡rr:-r",' ^./ r1IIt '~W.ile. ÜQtJ·~: r I, ::.kr'1z,1"- C ,j,,/tHI .. v Its: . ~'Ì i"'~ ,. Õf(¡",.,¡ Title U. 0., ] /.,1-), / / I D1= Appro\l~d ~ to Form <md L7~ty: )/~-;Y / B:~ /.4-1/;' ~p . "-'- N" ~. (', <- J".-. '''/ 1 .r=1, a.m~. .L-tt,!r-di ..JJ!J;'µŒ¡I-G t./ u ACü 2i99-()01.PSA =8I2C-01 FLûRIDA ÇO¡"iMU7'<1TIES TRUST ./"""v.. Ii - By: ~»~. -,f-. JarJ.¡fe Browning¡ EÃ~cuúve '1::Jirector V JI.-r¡ :~ fJ Dare: ~i jD Approvl!:d <l$ to Form :md Legality: Bÿ: d?~.-'1/ ~~bt¿,,(- Ann J, Wild., ï::fu'S¡ Counsel Pa"s 2 '" TRANSMiSSION AND iNFORMATION SHEET '- .,¡ DATE: March 27, 2001 Ti~AE: 12:34:20 PM FROM: 5T LUCIE COUNTY SOCC MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT 3150 WILL FEE ROAD FORT PIERCE, FL 34982 THIS TRANSMiSSiON HAS 4 PAGES INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET. DELIVER TO: Maria OMB FAX NO.: 2117 FROM: Jim David. Director Fax No.: (561)462-1565 (561) 462-1692 Phone No.: Home Phonë No.: (581)465-9564 Cellular Phone No.: (561 )284-5321 NOTES ANDIOR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS " '- ..."" FCT Contract Number 00-CT-9V-99-9A-Al-00l FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST P9A Award Number 99-001-P9A PEPPER PARK ADDITION CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on /)1'"" r.-.. Ñ r~ 7" , / ~ f' f' ,the date the last party executes this Agreement, by and between the FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST (FCT), a nonregulatory agency within the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, and ST. LUCIE COUNTY (Recipient), a local government of the State of Florida. The intent of this Agreement is to impose terms and conditions on the use of the proceeds of certain bonds, hereinafter described, and the lands acquired with such proceeds (project site), that are necessary to ensure compliance with applicable Florida law and federal income tax law and to otherwise implement provisions of Sections 259.101, 375.045, and Chapter 380, Part ill, Florida Statutes (F.S.). * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Chapter 380, Part ill, F.S., the Florida Communities Trust Act, creates a nonregulatory agency within the Department of Community Affairs (Department) that will assist local governments in bringing local comprehensive plans into compliance and implementing the goals, objectives, and policies of the conservation, recreation and open space, and coastal management elements of local comprehensive plans, or in conserving natural resources and resolving land use conflicts by providing financial assistance to local governments to carry out projects and activities authorized by the Florida Communities Trust Act; WHEREAS, Section 259.101(3)(c) of the Florida Preservation 2000 Act provides for the distribution of ten percent (10%) less certain reductions of the net Preservation 2000 Revenue Bond proceeds to the Department to provide land acquisition grants and loans to local governments through the FCT; WHEREAS, the Governor and Cabinet have annually authorized the sale and issuance of State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection Preservation 2000 Revenue Bonds (Bonds); and Bonds have been annually sold, thereby producing revenues for distribution according to Section 259.101(3)(c), F.S.; WHEREAS, the Bonds are issued as tax-exempt bonds, meaning that the intereston the Bonds is excluded from the gross income of bondholders for federal income tax purposes; Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 1 '-" ..." WHEREAS, Rule Chapter 9K-4, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), describes the procedures for evaluation and selection of lands proposed for acquisition using funds allocated to the FCT through the Department from the Preservation 2000 Trust Fund; WHEREAS, the FCT Governing Body met on September 23, 1999, to score, rank and select projects that were to receive conceptual approval for funding; WHEREAS, the Recipient's project, described in an application submitted for evaluation, I . was selected for funding and in accordance with Rule Chapter 9K-4, F.A.C., and more particularly described within this Agreement; WHEREAS, Rule 9K-4.010(2)(f), F.A.C., authorizes FCT to impose conditions for funding on those FCT applicants whose projects have been selected for funding; and WHEREAS, Rule 9K-4.0031(9) F.A.C., recognizes real' property owned by the Recipient and included in the application as part of the project site as an eligible source of local match, provided that real property owned by the Recipient has been acquired by the Recipient within one year prior to the application deadline or within 180 days after the application deadline for which the application was made. The date of this application deadline was June 02,1999; WHEREAS, the Recipient acquired the fee simple title to Parcel(s) of the project site on N ó v e..M.~ 'So> 9 q '7 from Ρ;;íDIoJ VI'rt-Lf:-Y L'oul\J',£L'<: CLue,. l t-.JC-. (Insert name[s]); :~7 (Insert daters]) WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the conditions of conceptual approval that must be satisfied by Recipient prior to the disbursement of any FCT Preservation 2000 funds awarded, as well as the restrictions that are imposed on the project site subsequent to its acquisition with the FCT Preservation 2000 Series Bond proceeds. NOW THEREFORE, FCT and Recipient mutually agree as follows: 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. At least two original copies of this Agreement shall be executed by Recipient and returned to the FCT office at 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 as soon as possible and before January 14,2000. If the Recipient requires more than one original document, the Recipient should photocopy the number of additional copies needed, and then execute each as an original document Upon receipt of the signed Agreements by FCT, FCT will execute the Agreements, retain one original copy and return all other copies that have been executed to the Recipient. Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 2 · ¥ ...,; 2. The name Conceptual Approval Agreement is used to indicate that the project has been approved as a concept that was described in FCT application number 99-001-P9A. Since the entire project site has not yet been negotiated for acquisition, some elements of the project are not yet known, such as the total purchase price, other project costs, and the tenns upon which an owner will voluntarily convey the property. The Conceptual Approval Agreement is in every respect a grant contract between the parties. The Agreement describes activities that will be conducted both prior and subsequent to acquisition of the project site, described in the application that was submitted and selected for funding by the FCT. 1 3. Conceptual approval for funding shall be until August 30, 2000. The FCT expects that, because the project site was partially preacquired by the Recipient and substantial work has already been done, the project will be fully completed by August 30, 2000. In the event the project has not been completed in full by August 30, 2000, the Conceptual Approval Agreement must be extended in order that the grant will remain in effect. In advance of the August 30, 2000, date and in sufficient time before a meeting of the FCT Goveming Body that would allow approval of an extension to this Agreement before its expiration, the Recipient must request a written extension to the Conceptual Approval Agreement for project continuation in compliance with Rule 9K-4.010(2)(j), F.A.C. If the Recipient does not request an extension, or if an extension is not granted to the Recipient by the FCT Goveming Body, the Preservation 2000 award granted to the Recipient by the FCT Governing Body shall terminate and all obligations hereunder shall cease. Based upon the Florida Legislature's ongoing oversight of the rate of expenditure of funds, and the impact on future funding if expenditures do not timely occur, the FCT requires that the project be completed as soon as possible after project selection. 4. Extensions to this Agreement, described in paragraph 3 above, shall not exceed 24 months from the date the Agreement was approved by the FCT, except as described in this paragraph. In compliance with Section 380.5l0(f), F.S., if the project is not concluded by November 30, 200 I, the project shall only be extended if the FCT Governing Body detennines that a request for additional time to complete the project is warranted based upon Recipient's demonstration that significant progress is being made toward closing the project or that extenuating circumstances warrant an extension of time. 5. This Agreement may be tenninated before its expiration at the written request of the Recipient. Such a request shall fully describe the circumstances that compel the Recipient to terminate the project. A request for termination should be mailed to the offices of the FCT at the address given in paragraph I above. The request for termination will be placed Qn the agenda of the next regularly scheduled meeting of the FCT Goveming Body for concurrence by the FCT. The termination shall be acknowledged by the FCT in a letter to the Recipient. Circumstances may arise that, in the analysis of the FCT, warrant terITÚnation of the project before its completion. In such an event, the FCT will advise the Recipient of its analysis Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 3 "'" ..., and will confer with the Recipient on continuation of the project. If the Recipient concurs, a request for termination will be considered at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the FCT Governing Body. 6. Recipient agrees to make diligent efforts to submit the documentation required in this Agreement to FCT as soon as is reasonably possible so that the project site costs may be acquired and reimbursed in an expeditious manner. Deadlines stated in this Agreement, as well as deadlines associated with any FCT activity relating to the project, are strictly enforced. Failure to adhere to dehdlines, whether stated in this Agreement or associated with meetings of the FCT Governing Body, may result in delays in the project, may result in allocation of time or resources to other recipients that responded timely, and may result in this Agreement being voidable. It is the responsibility of the Recipient to know all project deadlines, to devise a method of monitoring the project, and to adhere to ali deadlines. 7. The FCT Preservation 2000 award granted to thè Recipient will in no event exceed the lesser of Ninety-One And Sixty-Seven Hundredths Percent (91.67%) of the final total project costs, as defined in Rule 9K-4.002(30), F.A.C., or Five Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars And No Cents ( $550,000.00), unless the FCT Goveming Body approves a different amount, which shall be reflected in an addendum to this Agreement. 8. The grant amount stated in paragraph 7 above is based on the Recipient's estimate of total project costs in application number 99-001-P9A, as weli as limits on awards in the Notice of Application Period announcing the application cycle. When disbursing funds for the project, the FCT will recognize the actual total project costs, defined in Rule 9K-4.002(31), F.A.C., for acquisition of the project site. The total project costs will be reflected on a grant reconciliation statement prepared pursuant to paragraph 10 below. The FCT will participate in the land cost at either the actual purchase price, or the Maximum Approved Purchase Price based on appraisal reports that comply with requirements set forth in Rule 9K-6.007, F.A.C., whichever is less, and multiplied by the percent stated in paragraph 7 above. 9. The FCT Governing Body has given conceptual approval for funding to acquire the entire project site identified in the Recipient's application number 99-001-P9A. The FCT Governing Body reserves the right to withdraw the FCT award if the acreage that comprises the project site is reduced so that the objectives of the acquisition cannot be achieved. Request for modification of the boundary of the project site identified in the Recipient's application number 99-001-P9A may be considered by the FCT Governing Body foliowing the procedures for submission and review of boundary modification requests set forth in Rule 9K-4.0105, F.A.C. I If the project site is comprised of multiple parcels, an acquisition plan was required in the application. The FCT Governing Body reserves the right to withdraw the FCT award if the priority parcel(s), identified in the acquisition plan prepared pursuant to Rule 9K-4.004(5)(g), Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 4 , , '-' ...,¡ F.A.C., included in application number 99-00 I-P9A, incorporated by reference herein and attached as Exhibit "A," cannot be acquired. Approval of the Conceptual Approval Agreement shall constitute approval of theacquisition plan by FCT. 10. The FCT funds shall be delivered either in the form of eligible project costs prepaid by FCT to vendors, Seller(s) or Seller's(s') designated agent, or in the form of a State of Florida warrant to the Recipient. FCT award funds shall only be delivered after FCT approval of the project plan for jointly acquired parcels, or approval of terms of the acquisition of the project site parcel(s) th'at was preacquired. If the project site is comprised of multiple parcels, FCT shall deliver only the share of the FCT award that corresponds to the parcel that is closing or for which reimbursement is being made. FCT will prepare a grant reconciliation statement prior to the reimbursement that will evidence the amount of local match, if any is required, provided by the Recipient and the portion of the FCT award that corresponds to the parcel being closed or reimbursed. Cash expended by the FCT for eligible project costs incurred by the FCT will be 'recognized as part of the FCT grant award amount on the grant reconciliation statement. 11. The Recipient's local match, if any is required, shall be delivered either in the form of eligible project costs prepaid to vendors by the Recipient; purchase price paid to Seller; or eligible documented donation by Seller of land value. If the project site is comprised of multiple parcels, the FCT shall only recognize the eligible project costs that correspond to the parcel being closed or reimbursed. The cash expended by the Recipient for eligible project costs incurred by the Recipient will be recognized as part of the local match, if any is required, on the grant reconciliation statement prepared pursuant to paragraph 10 above. In the event Recipient's application number 99-001-P9A represents that land preacquired or land value donated by the Seller is the source of local match, if any is required, the value attributed to the land value local match for reimbursement shall be determined after an appraisal report that complies with the procedures and requirements set forth in Rule 9K-6.007, F.A.C. Such appraisal report shall be subject to review and approval by FCT prior to FCT funds being delivered for the project. 12. The FCT Governing Body adopted the Preservation 2000 Program Approved List of Complete Applications for Series P9A Funding Cycle on June II, 1999, at which time the project site became part of a list of lands that were approved for consideration for land acquisition. If action initiated by the Recipient that is the local government having jurisdiction over the project site, subsequent to June 11, 1999, results in a govemmentally-derived higher value due to an enhanced highest and best use, the FCT acquisition activities will be terminated unless the Seller agrees that the appraisal will be done at the highest and best use of the project site on or before June 11, 1999. I 13. Recipient hereby notifies the FCT that the following local government employee or official is the authorized key contact, or project manager, on behalf of the Recipient for purposes of coordinating project activities for the duration of the project: Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/3011999 FINAL 5 Name: ÙA-/J lBL Q DLlNT'( ¥ M G I fJíVI2..E .4íTO~N 6_1( '-' Title: Address: 2..2:ð6 1/ I Rill N I A Ave: FDe...T'P, B2C-G H:... , 3+1 B 2. Phone: , 501 - 401- 1420 Fax: 5bl-402- \440 The Recipient must notify the FCT as to any change in the authorization of the key contact on behalf of the Recipient named above. This notification must be made in writing to the Executive Director and signed by the appropriate local government employee, official or authorized representative named in paragraph n.5.d. below. 14. This Agreement may be amended at any time prior to FCT giving project plan approval to the Recipient. Any amendment must be set forth in a written instrument and agreed to by both the Recipient and FCT. Such amendments shall become a part of this Agreement. II. REQUIREMENTS THAT IVfUST BE MET PRIOR TO INITIATION OF PROJECT SITE NEGOTIATION I. The Recipient hereby notifies the FCT that KeLI PI (;NT [Note: Elect either FCr, Recipient or Recipient Agent] will be the party responsible for all negotiation and acquisition activities. 2. The Recipient hereby notifies the FCT that the Recipient's(s') Federal Employer Identification Number(s) is 5"i - <DoOO B~S 3. No later than January 14,2000, the Recipient must deliver to FCT a written statement from the project site property owner(s) evidencing that the owner(s) is willing to entertain an offer from the Recipient and FCT. 4. No later than January 14, 2000, the Recipient shall execute a Confidentiality Agreement pursuant to Rule 9K-6.010(5), F.A.C. A sample of a Confidentiality Agreement is attached as Exhibit "B"; an Agreement specific to this project will be prepared by FCT for execution by the Recipient. This Confidentiality Agreement is not a part of this Agreement and may be amended without amending this Agreement, if needed. 5. By execution of this Agreement, the Recipient affirms that: a. the Recipient is ready, willing and able to provide the local match, if any is required; Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 6 "" ...., b. the Recipient reaffirms the representations made in FCT Application number 99-001-P9A; c. the Recipient shall, on the anniversary date of the approval of the project plan by the FCT Governing Body, prepare and submit to FCT an annual report as required by Rule 9K-4.013, F.A.C.; d. the Recipient authorizes the local government employee, official or I . authorized representative named in this paragraph to execute all documents in connection with this project on behalf of the Recipient, including but not limited to the Conceptual Approval Agreement or any addenda thereto, purchase agreement for the property, grant reconciliation statement, closing documents, statements submitted as a part of the project plan, and Grant Award Agreement pursuant to Rule 9K-6.014(6), F.A.C.: Name: Dr-w I EL <S. fv\c.. 1 N 'T'<.. R..'í::_ Title: to u. /IJ í Y A-'TTD f!...tJ ur Address: :l-3C\::) V 112..!::¡ I N I A Av s 1=ò.e.., ¡)Ierz..c.£ ¡::: L- 34q M- Phone: 50/-402...-- /4'2-0 Fax: 'bbl 46'2.-144-D The Recipient must notify the FCT as to any change in the authorization of the local government employee, official or representative named in this paragraph to execute all documents on behalf of the Recipient. This notification must be made in writing to the Executive Director and signed by the appropriate local government employee, official or authorized representative. III. PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL ,I. Prior to final disbursement of award funds by FCT, the Recipient must prepare a project plan that complies with Rule 9K-4.0 II, F.A.C. This project plan is a compilation of the following items listed below, which must be reviewed and approved by FCT in a meeting of the FCT Governing Body. In the event that the Recipient is a partnership, the Recipient must also provide FCT with the interlocal agreement that sets forth the relationship among the partners and the fiscal and management responsibilities and obligations incurred by each partner for the project site as a part of its project plan. The project plan shall include, and shall not be considered by FCT unless it includes all of the following documents, to be reviewed and approved by FCT to ensure that the interest of the S tate of Florida will be protected: Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 7 '- ..., a. For the proiect site parcel(s) that were preacQuired bv the FCT ReCÏ'pient within one vear prior to or within 180 davs after the application deadline of .Tune 2.1999. and reco~nized as source of local match: (I) A statement that the acquisition activities were conducted consistent with either Rule 9K-6.004(3)(d)(l) or (2), F.A.C., whichever applies. . (2) A copy of the real estate contract(s) for sale and purchase of the preacquired par~el(s) between Recipient and -r ~ 10 OJ 'V A-l,..L-'éX Lot.LN-ri2-Y c.l-Uß, INC. (Insert name[s] of Seller[s]). (3) A copy of closing statements from Buyer(s) and Seller(s) for the purchase of the preacquired parcels. (4) A copy of the recorded deed(s) evidencing conveyance of title to the preacquired parcel(s) to the Recipient. (5) Certified survey(s) of the preacquired parcel(s) that meets the requirements of Rule 9K-6.006, F.A.C., and dated within 90 days of the date of acquisition of the preacquired parcel(s) by Recipient. (6) Appraisal report(s) prepared for the Recipient's acquisition of the pre acquired parcel(s) that complies with the requirements of Rule 9K-6.007, F.A.C.; said appraisal report(s) must be delivered to FCT in sufficient time for the review described in Section I.ll. above to be fully concluded before delivery ofFCT funds. (7) A copy of the title insurance policy(s) evidencing marketable title in Recipient to the preacquired parcel(s) and effective the date of acquisition of the preacquired parcel(s) by the Recipient, including a statement from the title insurer as to the minimum promulgated rate if premium was paid by Recipient, and all documents referenced in the title policy(s). (8) Environmental site assessment(s) of the preacquired parcel(s) certified to the Recipient, which meets the standards and requirements of the Recipient, and with a date of certification within 45 days before the date of acquisition of the preacquired parcel(s) by Recipient, together with the statement required by Rule 9K-6.0l2(4), F.A.C. b. For the project site parcells) to be iointly acquired with FCT: A purchase agreement(s) for acquisition of the project site, in a form approved by the FCT staff prior to being executed by the Seller, such agreement(s) being fully executed by both the Seller and the Recipient, that is based on an appraisal or appraisals Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 8 '-" 'WI prepared consistent with the requirements of Rule Chapter 9K-6, F.A.C., and otherwise consistent with the provisions of that rule chapter and in a form and with terms that are acceptable to FCT. (See paragraph 1 of Section IV below.) c. For all Dortions of the 9roject site: (1) A management plan that complies with the following: written according to Exhibit "C" (FCT Technical Assistance Bulletin #2-Writing a Management Plan), which is attachéd hereto and incorporated herein by reference; acceptable to FCT; addresses the criteria and conditions set forth in Section IV, V, VI, VIi and vm hereinbelow; and, at a minimum, sets forth how the site will be managed to further the purpose of the project, contains a description of all planned improvements to the project site, identifies the costs of management and site improvement and funding sources, and identifies the management entity and its funding source. If the Recipient is not the proposed managing entity, the project plan must also include a signed agreement between the Recipient and the managing entity stating the managing entity's willingness to manage the site, the manner in which the site will be managed to further the purpose(s) of the project, and identification of the source of funding for management. (2) A statement of the total project cost, including all non-recurring costs of project development. (3) A statement of the amount of the award being requested from FCT. (4) A statement from each Recipient in whose jurisdiction the project site is located that the project plan is consistent with the local comprehensive plan. (5) Evidence that conditions imposed as a part of the Conceptual Approval Agreement have been satisfied. (6) An affidavit from the Recipient evidencing that after conducting diligent search, the Recipient, to the best of its knowledge, represents that there are no existing or pending violations of any local, state, regional and federal laws and regulations on the project site. 2. The FCT strongly encourages the Recipient to request a courtesy review of its entire project plan, but especially its management plan, well in advance of the rr¡eeting of the Fer Governing Body where the project plan will be considered for approval and funds will be authorized for disbursement. As a part of its duties to the FCT Governing Body, FCT staff will make a recommendation of approval of complete and accurate project plans or disapproval of incomplete or insufficient project plans. Recipient is strongly urged to coordinate with the FCT Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 9 ¥ ...." staff in order that the FCT review of the management plan coincides with the anticipated FCT Governing Body approval and the closing date of the real estate transactions(s) for parcel(s) jointly acquired. 3. Pursuant to 9K-4.0 11(2)(h), F.A.C., FCT shall withhold project plan approval if the local comprehensive planes) of the Recipient or the Recipient's partner is, for any reason, found not in compliance by the Department after conceptual approval has been granted by FCT, unless the Recipient has executed a Compliance Agreement (formerly called a stipulated settlement agrebment) with the Department to resolve all of the issues raised by the Department in a statement of intent to find a plan not in compliance issued pursuant to Section 163.3184(8), F.S. 4. Pursuant toRule 9K-4.010(3), F.A.C., the FCT shall publish a Notice of Approval for Preservation 2000 funds in the Florida Administrative Weekly.that shall list each project plan ¡hat has received approval for funding and the amount of fundin'g approved. Any person with a substantial interest that is or may be determined by the decision of the FCT to reject or approve the project plan may request an administrative proceeding pursuant to Section 120.57, F.S., within 21 days from publication of the Notice of Approval for Preservation 2000 funds. Real estate closings or reimbursement of costs of acquisition of the project site may only take place after expiration of the 21-day notice period, so long as no requests for an administrative proceeding have been filed. IV. PROJECT SITE ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY CHAPTER 259, CHAPTER 375, AND CHAPTER 380, PART III, F.S. RECIPIENT AGREES AS FOLLOWS: I. FCT shall approve the terms under which the interest in land was acquired, pursuant to Section 380.510(3), F.S. Such approval is deemed given when the FCT Governing Body approves the project plan containing a copy of the document vesting title to the preacquired parcel(s) in the Recipient and executes the purchase agreement(s) to which FCT is a party for the parcel(s) to be jointly acquired. 2. Title to the project site shall be titled in the Recipient. 3. Each parcel to which the Recipient acquires title in the project site shall be subject to such covenants and restrictions as are, at a minimum, sufficient to ensure that the use of the project site at all times complies with Section 375.045 and 375.051, F.S.; Sectiqn 9, Article XII of the State Constitution; the applicable bond indenture under which the Bonds were issued; and any provision of the Internal Revenue Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder that pertain to tax exempt bonds and shall contain clauses providing for the conveyance of title to the project site in the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund upon failure to use the project site conveyed thereby for such purposes. Such covenants and restrictions as are Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 10 "'" ...., described in this paragraph shall be in the form of a Grant Award Agreement, prepared by FCT, executed by the parties to the Conceptual Approval Agreement and recorded at the time of closing or reimbursement for acquisition of the project site. The recordable Grant A ward Agreement shall restate the conditions that were placed on the project site at the time of project selection and initial grant approval. All statements contained in the recordable Grant A ward Agreement are contained in this Conceptual Approval Agreement, with the exception of statements that do not survive the real estate closing or the reimbursement for the acquisition of the project site.. I 4. The Grant Award Agreement containing such covenants and restrictions as referenced in paragraph 3 above and describing the real property subject to the Agreement shall be executed by the FCT and Recipient at the time of the real estate closing or the reimbursement for the project site and shall be recorded in the county in which the project site is located. 5. If any essential term or condition of the Grant Award Agreement is violated, and the Recipient does not correct the violation within 30 days of written notice of violation, title to all interest in the project site shall be conveyed to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund. Either the deed for jointly acquired parcels or the Grant Award Agreement referenced in paragraph 3 above for preacquired parcel(s) shall set forth the executory interest of the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund. 6. The interest acquired by the Recipient in the project site shall not serve as security for any debt of the Recipient. 7. If the existence of the Recipient terminates for any reason, title to all interest in real property it has acquired with the FCT award shall be conveyed or revert to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, unless FCT negotiates an agreement with another local government or nonprofit organization which agrees to accept title to all interest in and to manage the project site. 8. The project site shall be managed only for the conservation, protection and enhancement of natural resources and for public outdoor recreation that is compatible with the conservation, protection and enhancement of the project site, along with other related uses necessary for the accomplishment of this purpose. The proposed uses for the project site must be specifically designated in the management plan approved by the FCT as a part of the project plan. V. OBLIGATIONS OF THE RECIPIENT AS A CONDITION OF PROJECT FUNDING 1. Following the acquisition of the project site, the Recipient shall ensure that the future land use designation assigned to the project site is for a category dedicated to open space, conservation, or outdoor recreation uses as appropriate. If an amendment to the Recipient's Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 11 '-' ...., comprehensive plan is required, the amendment shall be proposed at the next comprehensive plan amendment cycle available to the Recipient subsequent to the project site's acquisition. 2. Recipient shall ensure, and provide evidence thereof to FCT, that all activities under this Agreement comply with all applicable local, state, regional and federal laws and regulations, including zoning ordinances and the applicable adopted and approved comprehensive plan. Evidence shall be provided to FCT that all required licenses and permits have been obtained prior to the commencement of any construction. , 3. The Recipient shall, through its agents and employees, prevent the unauthorized use of the project site or any use thereof not in confomúty with the management plan approved by the FCT as a part of the project plan. 4. FCT staff or its duly authorized representatives shall have the right at any time to inspect the project site and the operations of the Recipient at the'· project site. 5. All buildings, structures, improvements, and signs shall require the prior written approval of FCT as to purpose. Further, tree removal, other than non-native species, and major land alterations shall require the written approval of FCT. The approvals required from FCT shall not be unreasonably withheld by FCT upon sufficient demonstration that the proposed structures, buildings, improvements, signs, vegetation removal or land alterations will not adversely impact the natural resources of the project site. The approval by FCT of the Recipient's management plan addressing the items mentioned herein shall be considered written approval from FCT. VI. OBLIGATIONS OF THE RECIPIENT RELATING TO THE USE OF BOND PROCEEDS I. FCT is authorized by Sections 375.045(4) and 380.510(7)(a) and (b), F.S., to impose conditions for funding on Recipient in order to ensure that the project complies with the requirements for the use of Preservation 2000 Bond proceeds including without limitation the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder as the same pertain to tax exempt bonds. 2. If the project site is to remain subject, after its acquisition by the Recipient and/or the Trustees, to any of the below listed transactions, events, and circumstances, the Recipient shall provide at least 60 days advance written notice of any such transactions, events, and circumstances to FCT, and shall provide to FCT such information with respect thereto as FCT reasonably requests in order to evaluate the legal and t~ consequences of such ~ctivity or interest. Recipient agrees and acknowledges that the following transactions, events, and circumstances may be disallowed on the project site as they may have negative legal and tax consequences under Florida law and federal income tax law. The Recipient further agrees and Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 12 ¥ .. acknowledges that the following transactions, events, and circumstances may be allowed up to a certain extent based on guidelines or tests outlined in the Federal Private Activity regulations of the Internal Revenue Service: organization; a. any sale or lease of any interest in the project site to any person or b. the operation of any concession on the project site by any person or organization; c. any sales contract or option to buy things attached to the project site to be severed from the project site, with any person or organization; d. any use of the project site by any person other than in such person's capacity as a member of the general public; e. any change in the character or use of the project site from that use expected at the date of the issuance of any series of Bonds from which the disbursement is to be made; or f. a management contract of the project site with any person or organization; g. such other activity or interest as may be specified from time to time in writing by FCT to the Recipient. The foregoing are collectively referred to as the "disallow able activities." VII. DISALLOWABLE ACTIVITIES/REMEDIES In the event that FCT determines at any time or from time to time that the Recipient is engaging or allowing others to engage in disallowable activities on the project site, the Recipient agrees to immediately cease or cause the cessation of the disallowable activity upon receipt of written notice from the FCT. To the extent allowed by law, Recipient hereby indemnifies and agrees to hold FCT harmless from all claims, causes of action or damages of any nature whatsoever arising from or with respect to disallowable activities on the project site. Nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of the Recipient's sovereign immunity. In addition to all other rights and remedies at law orin equity, FCT shall have the right to temporary and permanent injunctions against Recipient for any disallow able activity on the project site. DELEGATIONS AND CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN THE RECIPIENT AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODIES, NOT FOR PROm ENTITIES, OR NON GOVERNMENTAL PERSONS FOR USE OR MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT SITE WILL IN NO WAY RELIEVE THE RECIPIENT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 13 ..., THAT THE CONDITIONS !J.v!POSED HEREIN ON THE PROJECT SITE AS A RESULT OF UTILIZING BOND PROCEEDS TO ACQUIRE THE PROJCT SITE ARE FULLY COMPLIED WITH BY THE CONTRACTING PARTY. '-' VIII. CONDITIONS PARTICULAR TO THE PROJECT SITE THAT MUST BE ADDRESSED IN THE Ñ1ANAGEMENT PLAN The management plan for the project site is mentioned throughout this Agreement, and is particularly desCribed in Paragraph Lb. of Section ill above. In addition to the various conditions already described in this Agreement, which apply to all sites acquired with FCT funds, the management plan shall address the following conditions that are particular to the project site and result from either representations made in the application that received scoring points or observations made by the FCT staff during the site visit described in Rule 9K-4.010(2)(f), F.A.C.: 1. Outdoor recreational facilities including a walking trail, covered shelters, wildlife observation areas, fishing docks and interpretive signage shall be provided. The facilities shall be developed in a manner that allows the general public reasonable access for observation and appreciation of the natural resources on the project site without causing harm to those resources. 2. A permanent recognition sign shall be maintained in the entrance area of the project site. The sign shall acknowledge that the project site is open to the public and was purchased with funds from the Florida Communities Trust Preservation 2000 Program. Such recognition shall also be included in all printed literature and advertising associated with the project site. 3. A survey of vegetative communities and plant species shall be conducted on the project site. The management plan shall detail how the survey shall be used during development of the site to ensure the protection, restoration, and preservation of the natural resources on the project site. 4. The maritime hammock and mangrove swamp communities that occur on the project site, and adjacent seagrass beds, shall be preserved and appropriately managed to ensure the long-term viability of these vegetative communities. 5. The project site shall be managed in a manner that protects and enhances habitat for listed wildlife species that utilize or could potentially utilize the project site, including the manatee, wood stork, white ibis, roseate spoonbill and other wading birds. Mar¡agement of the project site shall be coordinated with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission on the management of the project site for the protection of listed species and listed species habitat. Periodic surveys of listed species using the project site shall be conducted to ensure the protection of listed animal species and their habitat. Funded/Partial Preacquired/99-001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 14 ¥ w 6. No motorized boating facilities shall be provided at the project site. The managemenrplan shall include specific provisions to protect manatees and manatee habitat. 7. A vegetative buffer shall be provided between the project site and residential development to the north of the site to provide a visual buffer for park users and adjacent homeowners. 8. Management of the proJect site shall be coordinated with the Department of Environmental Protection's Aquatic Preserve Management Plan and the Indian River Lagoon SWIM Plan to protect and enhance water quality within the Indian River Lagoon. 9. The water quality and ecological function of impounded wetlands at the project site shall be enhanced through improvements in water circulation, tidal replication, control of nuisance vegetation and elimination of pollution sources. Impoundment management shall be coordinated with other impoundments along the Indian River Lagoon. . 10. An ongoing water quality and biological monitoring program shall be developed in conjunction with the Department of Environmental Protection and implemented on the project site to evaluate the results of adaptive management strategies used on the site and to document changes in water quality and biological indicators over time. II. An ongoing monitoring and control program for invasive vegetation including exotic (non-native) and nuisance native plant species shall be implemented at the project site. The objective of the control program shall be the elimination of invasive exotic plant species and the maintenance of a diverse association of native vegetation. The Exotic Pest Plant Council's List of Florida's Most Invasive Species shall be used to identify invasive exotics on the project site. 12. Prior to the commencement of any proposed development activities, measures will be taken to detennine the presence of any archaeological sites. All planned activities involving known archaeological sites or potential site areas shall be closely coordinated with the Department of State, Division of Historic Resources in order to prevent the disturbance of significant sites. 13. Management of the project site shall be coordinated with the adjacent county-owned Pepper Park. , 14. Pedestrian and bicycle access to the project site shall be promoted as an alternative to automobile transportation by providing pedestrian walkways and bicycle parking stands at the site. Funded/Partial P reacquired/99-00 1-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 15 ¥ w IS. The project site shall be incorporated into the overall management program for the North Hutchinson Island and Indian River Lagoon Greenway and shall be protected and managed as part of linked conservation and recreational lands. 16. The requirements imposed by other grant program funds that may be sought for activities associated with the project site shall not conflict with the terms and conditions of this award. This Agreement including Exhibits "A", if required, "B", and "C" embodies the entire agreement between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement. ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST By: YÍ/.lt) d Æ HÆJ Print Name: Prt Woof! It. Lew IS ItS:I'1AIe, -<'37) 4/ (;,(J'(/Tf (];NHI.'Í'iJ¡J~S IO-~ ~ t;'\\. - By: 'It'.,,\~ I~\·~ S ven M. Seibert, Chair ¡~~ ~~ \ ~ Date: l \.. ~ Date: Approved as to Form and Legality: By: , Ann J. Wild, r I Funded/Partial Preacquired/99oo001-P9A 11/30/1999 FINAL 16