Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 03-27-01
`O/kUae� ., ea" MARCH 2 71 2001 9:00 AM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There Will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON -AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras- - Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional -_ workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours_ prior to the meeting. rW M BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.stlucieco.gov AGENDA John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson District 4 Cliff Barnes District 5 March 27, 2001 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES do tv 4, ,rx —�/� /[x. e,v,,t C:e Approve the minutes of the m eting held March 20, 2001. ,E1 'tic c Cif "4) 0-t 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATION Doug Anderson, County Administrator, will introduce David Rodriguez, Human Resources Director. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT R&6,6, r - 49a14"etgq/ Few, 6�4 . 4. CONSENT AGENDA tV) f`ti - ntlati a4(" SlcnLsaxu 5-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 5A. There are no public hearings scheduled for March 27, 2001 End of Public Hearings 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Project No. 01-00106 / Resolution No. 01-013 / Qualified Target Industry Business 5-40 Tax Refund Applicant - Pursuant to S.288.106 FZrida Statutes, staff recommends that.the Board pass Resolution No. 01-013 recommending that Project Number 01- 00106 be approved as a Qualified Target Industry Business Tax Refund applicant. odecides to al any a riontak nbythceedineBoardsatthesebefore tmehisBngswillneronica edoard are tarecordoftheppdro a d�gsanpersdfopr uchpurposemayneed to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made Upo tithe to thef roceedngs will be g antedt�se individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn m., ApY P rty. P opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearmgppon request An one with a disabihty requiring accommodation to attend this meetin should contact the St Lucie Countyommunity Sernces Manager at (561) 462-tio or TDD (561) 462-14 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior o the meeting. r.. ..r REGULAR AGENDA MARCH 27, 2001 PAGE TWO 7. COUNTY ATTORNEY — Indrio North Savannas / Florida Communities Trust Project - Staff will update the Board with the status of the project. 160'STRATION � /�� `c`^ J, t 4o , Bi-weekly Committee Reports - The Board will give updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on. 7C /Zr , tsu 2La-14 Lei �J21+�CCC, Tr��ctil<i1,a uj �s c< �___�__�___ - �; �c17tiC d2t� ✓cam. M CONSENT AGENDA March 27, 2001 WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 25 PARKS & RECREATION `d A. River Park Marina Floating Dock Permit - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to apply for a floating dock permit for River Park Marina and allow enhancement to docking facilities. B. Equipment Request No. 01-241- Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment request for the purchase of a football field marking machine in the amount of $1,027 for use at the South County Regional Stadium. C. Budget Amendment No. 01-134 / Equipment Request No. 01-244 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request to purchase a new computer in the amount of $1,598 for the Education Specialist at the Environmental Learning Center. 3. PUBLIC WORKS A. Solid Waste / Cost Accounting Report for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Solid Waste Division to publish, the Solid Waste Full Cost Accounting Report for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, in. -a newspaper of general circulation. B. Grant Application - Consider staff recommendation to approve the - submission of a grant application to Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) in the amount of $250,000 to be used at South Causeway Island, and approve the resolution for assistance under the Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program. C. Solid Waste / Change Order No. 2 and Final Payment / Class 1, Cell 3A C Construction and Leachate Force Main Relocation Project Consider staff r recommendation to approve the change order and final payment to Sheltra Su e. o;,_& Son Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $167,869.76, bringing t�a�k 6E"cl -the new contract amount to $2,086,700.81. This amount is $69,883.69less �7c whb�c�l<r v ,khan the contract amount approved on October 10, 2000. p lid W D. Solid Waste /Equipment Purchase -Consider staff recommendation to approve the purchase of one used trailer and two used tandem converter dollies in the amount of $15,550. E. Solid Waste / Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise for bids for the sale of a 1990 surplus crane - Effer Model8600-23 Articulating Crane. F. ' Engineering / Work Authorization No. 3 - Consider staff recommendation - '— to approve the work authorization with Hazen & Sawyer Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $4,770 for additional surveying services required for the '--- evaluation of the Ft. Pierce Farms Water Control District Canal System and - authorize the Chairman to sign the work authorization. *4W CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 27, 2001 PAGE TWO 4. COMMUNITY SERVICES FY 2000/01 U.S.C. 5307 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Grant - Consider staff recommendation to accept the grant award in the amount of $1,069,249, approve the subgrant agreement with the Council on Aging/Community Transit, and authorize the Chairman to sign all documents. 5. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET A. Budget Resolution No. 01-76 / Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Grant for the Fort Pierce Boat Launching Facility - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget resolution to appropriate and expend the funds from the grant in the amount of $251,986. B. Budget Resolution No. 01-85 / Briargate Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) Budget - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the budget resolution establishing the budget for the Briargate MSBU Project. C. Budget Resolution No. 01-84 / King's Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District Budget - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the budget resolution establishing the budget for the Kings Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District Project. 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Quit Claim Deeds / Dixieland S/D - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign the Quit -Claim Deeds and return deeds to petitioner for recording in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. B. Resolution No. 01-82 / Street Naming / Loop Road - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution to name Loop Road; authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution, instruct staff to record the resolution in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, and inform the necessary Utilities and Public Agencies of the naming of Loop Road _D C. Revocable License Agreement / Robert C. Fender - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Revocable License Agreement, authorize the Chairman to execute the Revocable License Agreement and instruct Mr. Fender to record the Agreement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 7. UTILITIES - A. Agreement Extension - Consider staff recommendation _to =approve the -- extension of the agree ent between the City of Punta Gorda and Sunstate --- Meter & Supply, Inc. for the purchase of water meters for various St. Lucie County Utility Districts. - n V CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 27, 2001 PAGE THREE 7. UTILITIES (CONTINUED) B. Memorandum of Understanding - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities and the funding in the amount of $10,000 consistent with all of the participants. 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 - Consider staff recommendation to approve utilization of the maintenance building at the St. Lucie County International Airport to activate FTZ 218. B. Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 Board of Directors - Consider staff recommendation to approve the nomination of Rudy Howard and the retention of Dewitt Beckett to the Central Florida Foreign Trade -Zone 218 Board of Directors. C. Resolution No. 01-014 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution urging the Acquisition and Restoration Council to continue funding for the North Fork St. Lucie River Project under the Florida Forever Program. 9. LIBRARY St. Lucie West Library / Contracted Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the expenditure of $85,424 for contracted services through Indian River Community College for the St. Lucie West Library, and authorize the County Administrator to sign the Purchasing requisition for payment of services. 10. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE Bid No. 01-02 2 / Roof Replacements -Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to Tom Tanenbaum, Inc. for Empire I and Empire lI, and to The Roof Authority, Inc., for EOC, and Rock Road Al-A4, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney. ADMINISTRATION �c -1 Budget Amendment No. BA01-125 / Postage Machine Rental - Consider staff recommendation to approve the replacement of the postage machine in the t f e 6"'4-Human Resources Mail Room, and approve the $udget amendment for the rental of a posta a machine f om Pitney Bowes in the amount of $667 per month. -- 12.: DECISION PACKAGES /PHASE 11 - Personal Computer and Server Replenishment Program Consider staff recommendation to approve the program and authorize staff to negotiate and bring back an agreement for Board consideration. �hw ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 AGENDA March 27, 2001 1. MINUTES T,, z e� S -G Approve the minutes of the meeting held March 13, 2001. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA -p 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 24 and No. 25 2. MOSQUITO CONTROL Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. C99-03-331 with Florida Rock Industries, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the amendment to provide the District with Coquina Rock at $3.50 per ton, and authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment. • NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electrouically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the_Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record - of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any Individual testifying during a hearing upon - request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. 14110 LUCIE COUNTY JL ,X%." ON DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes rt 5 District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 AGENDA March 27, 2001 1. MINUTES �y jw�- Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 13, 2001. _ 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 20 thru No. 25 2. PUBLIC WORKS Engineering / Application Request / Resolution No. 01-002 - Consider staff reco funng application n request to he FloridaErosion Program ida Department ofEnvironmentalProe on,diand authorize the Chairman to sign the resolution. -- -- NOME: All proceedings before this Bond are electronically recorded. Any person who_deddes to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedingsandfor such Purpose way ingneed dtgensure hthata�bes torn in. Any ecord of the party to — — is made. Upon the request of any party totheproceedmgs,-indtviduals testifying _ proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St Luae CoudtyCommodity Services Manager at (561) 462- j777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting - 'Ww ..i BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA March 27, 2001 CONSENT AGENDA MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET C-A.1 Early Redemption of Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1996 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the early redemption of the $1,860,000 St. Lucie County, Florida, Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1996 (Becker Road MSBU), at par, as recommended by Mr. Leedy as outlined. C-A.2 Early Redemption of Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the early redemption of the $14,920,000 St. Lucie County, Florida, Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998 (South Hutchinson Island Wastewater System), at par, as recommended by Mr. Leedy as outlined. C-A.3 Early Redemption of Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998A - Consider staff recommendation to approve the early redemption of the $910,000 St. Lucie County, Florida, Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998A (South Hutchinson Island - North District Wastewater System), at par, as recommended by Mr. Leedy as outlined. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, Individuals testifying during a hearing will be swom in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St Lucle County Community services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. .1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA March 27, 2001 CONSENT AGENDA MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET C-A.1 Early Redemption of Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1996 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the early redemption of the $1,860,000 St. Lucie County, Florida, Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1996 (Becker Road MSBU), at par, as recommended by Mr. Leedy as outlined. C-A.2 Early Redemption of Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the early redemption of the $14,920,000 St. Lucie County, Florida, Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998 (South Hutchinson Island Wastewater System), at par, as recommended by Mr. Leedy as outlined. C-A.3 Early Redemption of Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998A - Consider staff recommendation to approve the early redemption of the $910,000 St. Lucie County, Florida, Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998A (South Hutchinson Island - North District Wastewater System), at par, as recommended by Mr. Leedy as outlined. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Arty person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, Individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TOO (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ` BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT Date: March 13, 2001 Convened: 9:05 a.m. Tape:1,2 Adjourned: 10:40 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairperson, Frannie Hutchinson, John D. Bruhn Paula A. Lewis, Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Paul Phillips, Airport Director; Marie Gouin, Management & Budget Manager; Don West, County Engineer; Jack Southard, Director, Public Safety; Ruth Totton, Interim Purchasing Manager; Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager; Joe Finnegan, Risk Manager; Pat Clute, Interim Human Resource Director; Pete Keogh, Director Leisure Services; Linda Brown, Recreation Manager; Dennis Wetzel, Information Technologies Director; Paul Hiott, Veterans Manager; Gayla Barwick, Tourism Development Manager; Susan Kilmer, Library Manager; Dennis Murphy, Assistant Community Development Director; Gertrude Walker, Supervisor of Elections; Beth Ryder, Community Services Manager; Deputy Williams, Lauri Heistermann, Deputy Clerk MINUTES It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Hutchinson to approve the minutes of the meeting held February 27, 2001; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS There was not public comment CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Coward and seconded by Com. Barnes to approve the consent agenda; and upon roll call motion carried unanimously. WARRANT LISTS 2 MOSQUITO CONTROL Amendment No. 2 of Agreement No. C00-01-207 with Aeration Industries International, Inc. (aka Aeration Industries for Aero II - Series II Horizontal Aspirating Aerators and Aerator Parts. The Board approved staff recommendation to approve the amendment, renewing the annual agreement at the fixed pricing specified, and authorized the Chairman to execute the agreement. 3. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Budget Amendment No. 01-127 - The Board approved staff recommendation to approve the -1- NNW n budget amendment providing funds for the purchase of two ULV Monitoring Units. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:40 a.m. Clerk of Circuit Court Chairman IPA EROSION DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA % REGULAR MEETING Date: February 13, 2001 Tape: 2 Convened: 11:01 a.m. Adjourned: 11:11 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward, Paula A. Lewis, Frannie Hutchinson, John D. Bruhn ' Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, James David, Mosquito Control Director, Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Paul Phillips Airport Director, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Deputy Nickel, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk MINUTES (2-1080) It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the minutes of the meeting held January 9, 2001; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. CONSENT AGENDA (2-1086) It was moved by com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. WARRANT LIST The District approved Warrant List No. 15 thru 19. 2. PUBLIC WORKS Engineering/Work authorization with Taylor Engineering, Inc., - The District approved the work authorization with Taylor Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $169,850 and said work perform beach and inlet monitoring, data analysis, and annual report preparation in support of the beach nourishment permit, and the inlet management plan as authorized by the Chair. There being no further business to be brought before the District, the meeting was adjourned. Clerk of Circuit Court -1- Chairman .,w BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: March 20, 2001 Tape: 1-4 Convened:7:00 p.m. Adjourned: 1:30 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Cliff Barnes Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Julia Schewchuk, Community Development Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Dennis Murphy Asst, Community Development Director, Don West, County Engineer, Deputy Williams, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk MINUTES (1-029) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held March 13, 2001; and upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATION Resolution No. 01-79- Proclaiming the week of March 25, 2001 through March 31, 2001 as "Diabetes Awareness Week" in St. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 01-79; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Mr. Hamilton was present to accept the proclamation. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms. Francis Dura, area resident, addressed the Board regarding the paving of the roads in her area and stated the balance of Carlton Road has not been paved and she feels this area really needs to road to be paved. Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island resident, addressed the fact that item 5D was pulled and questioned the advertisement of the ordinance where the word "tent' was not placed on the advertisement. He also questioned how this ordinance came about. Mr. George Greenstein, representing residents from the Ballantrae Golf and Yacht Club, addressed the Board regarding the future manatee zones and stated they felt the existing regulations were enough and that they needed to be enforced. -1- Ms. Janice McGriff, Sheraton Plaza Homeowners addressed the Board regarding the problems in her subdivision where debris was left when they were fixing 25`h street and the sub -division entrance. She stated they left the lime rock as well as the asphalt pieces all over their street and in their lawns. Mr. Cornell Johnson, Sheraton Plaza, also addressed the Board regarding the problems in his development. Mrs. Williams, Sheraton Plaza, addressed the Board regarding the pavement and the man holes not being level causing a problem in her development. The residents of Sheraton Plaza were advised that this was a state project. The Chairman decided to visit the area along with the state representatives to view the problems together. The Chairman advised the Board and those present that items C-6 from the Consent Agenda was pulled as well as items 51) and 6 from the regular agenda. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the Consent Agenda with item C-6 pulled; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 24. 2. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET A. Budget Resolution No. 01-77- Rouse Road MSBU Budget- The Board approved adopting the budget resolution establishing the budget for the Rouse Road MSBU project and approved the use of funds from the MSBU project reserves to begin construction, and authorized the Office of Management and Budget to proceed with obtaining interim financing for the project from Bank of America when the pre -payment period ends. B. Budget Resolution No. 0 1 -78- Scrivener Error- The Board approved adopting the budget resolution correcting a scrivener error in amounts previously identified. 3. AIRPORT A. Resolution No. 01-78/joint Participation Agreement JPA- The Board approved accepting the Florida Department of Transportation Joint Participation Agreement, authorized the Chairman to sign and execute the JPA and the resolution for the utilities improvement project at St. Lucie County Airport. This JPA provides for $36,000 of the $85,060 necessary for the project. This is a 20% matching fund JPA with the Florida Department of Transportation. B. Airport Water System Improvement Contract- The Board approved awarding the Airport Water System Improvement Contract to the low bidder, Johnson David, Inc., in the amount of $85,060. 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Final Plat Approval/Childers/S/D - The Board approved the final plat of Childers S/D and authorized final execution. -2- '.,. v, 0311G101` F?ABWARR FUND TITLE ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2001 TO 16-MAR-2001 FUND SUMMARY EXPENSES PAGE PAYROLL 1 001 General Fund 236,683.44 288,232.20 001117 FTA 49 USC Sec 5307 98/99 27.35 363.66 001124 FTA USC Section 5307 FY 99/00 181.81 363.65 001128 Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning FY01 13,200.97 4,471.64 001130 TC Community Action Agency FY00/01 2,790.04 1,049.10 001135 Blind Creek Park Dune Crossover 741.88 0.00 001252 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant 512.21 1,188.80 001256 CTD TRIP Grant FY 00/01 17,579.52 0.00 001258 TDC Planning Grant FY00/01 162.38 1,191.84 001259 Emergency Mgmt. Prep & Asst. FY 00/ 466.41 3,470.36 001807 Floridian Aquifer Well Monitoring 6,044.81 0.00 001809 SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 101.79 1,188.80 001810 Arts Along These Waters/Student Art 236.86 0.00 101 Transportation Trust Fund 322,054.36 96,852.43 101211 FDEP Canal & Stormwater Retrofit 102.50 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 26,942.04 45,787.61 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 8,078.43 3,806.40 104001 Recreation Donations Fund 602.00 0.00 105 Library Special Grants Fund 3,003.47 2,100.42 107 Fine & Forfeiture Fund 89,723.70 54,860.50 107002 Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar 26,696.28 25,045.45 Blakely Subdivision Fund 69.00 0.00 Port & Airport Fund 6,301.33 6,291.61 145201 FCT- Pepper Park Addition 7,450.00 0.00 145814 2000-2001 Lagoon License Plate gran 232.11 0.00 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 7,423.20 2,476.44 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 1,267.97 3,405.04 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 1,178.62 .1,850.58 183004 Ct Admin.- Teen Court 1,298.25 2,673.73 183212 OSCA-Court Reporting Grant 00/01 2,056.50 0.00 184202 Ft Pierce jnlet Mgmt Implementation 4,202.76 0.00 184203 Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration 19,767.84 0.Do 184803 FIND -Ft Pierce Inlet Hydrodynamic 3,152.07 0.00 185001 SHIP Housing Assistance FY 00/01 1,915.30 2,429.22 186 Recycling Operating Fund 1,517.79 1,789.01 186204 Recycling & Education Grant FY00/01 3,805.34 596.35 262 Tourism Dev 4th Cent I&S Fund 7,267.66 0.00 304 Communication System Fund 10,658.95 0.00 315 County Building Fund 5,290.24 0.00 County Capital 210,508.80 0.00 .316 316001 Transportation Capital 941.00 0.00 0.00 '382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 15,677.59 29,876.86 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 34,991.83 401220 Litter Control & Prevention FY00/01 675.00 0.00 418 Golf Course Fund 15,582.32 19,402.57 421 H.E.W. Utilities Fund 161.62 207.51 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 2,736.58 3,764.41 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 5,426.79 2,250.89_ 461 Sports Complex Fund 19,348.76 12,442.87 471 Holiday Pines Utilities Fund 17,965.18 1,870.75 491 Building Code Fund 91,150.02 19,909.70 501 Information Technology Fund 53,420.91 67,460.23 505 Health Insurance Fund 146,273.21 3,034.75 505001 Property/Casualty Insurance Fund 775.36 1,626.22 510 Service Garage Fund 21,794.15 9,183.31 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 1,922.20 3,214.16 625 Law Library 2.40 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 1,480,140.90 725,729.07 1%w COUNTY ATTORNEY Treasure Coast Archers/Facilities Use Agreement- The Board approved the proposed Facilities Use Agreement with the Treasure Coast Archers and authorized the Chairman to s ign the agreement upon receipt of the signed originals from the club. 6. This item was pulled. REGULAR AGENDA 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT(1-1045) A. Resolution No. 01-008/Rose Kyle Properties- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in zoning from the CN Zoning District to the CO Zoning District to allow the applicant to establish a medical office on the subject property. Mr. Herb Beach, White City resident, addressed the Board in favor of this petition. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 01-008; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Resolution No. 01-009- Vedic Cultural Society- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in zoning from the CG Zoning to the RF Zoning District to allow the applicant to establish a worship center on the subject property. Mr. Herb Beach, White City resident, addressed the Board in favor of this petition and stated he would like to see the road improved. Mr. S.U. Thomas area resident, addressed the Board regarding the property zoned commercial general and stated the road is graded incorrectly. Mr. Thomas stated he would like to sell one portion of the property and was told he could not. Staff was directed to assist Mr. Thomas with his problem. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 01-009; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. (1-1379) C. Resolution No. 01-012- Midway Energy Center- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution, subject to the cited conditions contained therein, granting a change in zoning from AGl and AG25 zoning district to PNRD approval for the Cooney - Midway Grove PNRD and partial final PNRD approval for the construction of a 510 megawatt, electric generating plant. Location North side of Midway Road approximately .76 miles east of 11_Mile Road and approximately one half mile west of I-95. Staff gave a report on this item. The Asst. Community Development Director reviewed the approval order of this project. Resolution 01-012 was reviewed and the Board was advised of a new paragraph added to the change in zoning section . The new paragraph should state: -3- `WWI "Areas subject to preliminary planned non residential development". Then the full legal description would be inserted for the entire 116 acres. Paragraph A now becomes paragraph B . This change in zoning paragraph would be granting final PNRD development plan approval to the 36 acres for the area to be developed by the Midway Energy Center. Paragraph C under Site Plan is a particular paragraph which would be commonly seen with a standard plan or site development review. This is the part which speaks to approving the specific site development plan and this is the part where the Board has the ability to impose development related and recently related conditions on the particular project. There are 15 stated conditions for the approval of this project. The first 11 conditions are related to the overall Cooney Midway Groves PNRD preliminary PUD. These are umbrella type conditions that address the entire project. The remaining 4 conditions would be applicable only to the Midway Energy Center portion of this project. After reviewing these conditions with the Board members, they found it necessary to make a few changes on these conditions. They are conditions number 1, 8, 11 and 14. In 14b the term "turbine" should be added after every figure and before the word "hours". These conditions are noted as attachment 1. Com. Coward requested the type of fuel should be stated on 14 C and through out. Com. Barnes questioned who would make the determination of the availability of the low sulfur fuel and would it be based on it not being economically available or physically available. The Asst. Community Development Director stated the applicant would the best person to answer this question. Mr. Al Malefatto, Greenberg & Traurig, representing the applicant addressed the Board on this issue. Mr. Malefatto gave a full presentation on the project. Mr. Greg Krause, Project Manager, addressed the Board on the project and presented the Board with 250 signatures in favor of the project. Mr. George Hessler, Hessler and Associates, addressed the sound levels of the facility and the surrounding area. Mr. Greg Krause advised the Board that the facility would not exceed county code, but would meet or be quieter than the code. Mr. Dave Kellermeyer, addressed the permitting and licensing of power plants and the air quality issue. Mr. Rand Edlestein addressed the water use and consumption and stated the project would not have an adverse affect on the aquifer. Ms. Anna Catrell, Land Use Planner, addressed the Board on her assessment of the project. Mr. Tom Johnson, Real Estate Appraiser, addressed the Board regarding the specific criteria this project consisted of in order to find the right location for the project. Com. Coward questioned why they selected this site. Mr. Greg Krause, Project Manager advised Com. Coward and the Board on what they looked for in their selection process. Im `o .W Mr. Greg Boggs, Thomas Lucido and Associates, addressed the Board on the landscaping of the project. Mr. Krause reiterated that they will be meeting the county ordinance and are prepared to make a commitment and add a condition of approval to the development order that they would meet the sound and noise criteria throughout their site. Com. Coward alluded to the statement that they were going to meet National Standards and now he stated, they are saying they would meet county code of 55. He questioned if they are going to meet National Standards or county code which is a lesser standard. - Mr. Krause stated that Mr. Hessler's evaluation was that they would meet the National Standard which was a goal for surrounding residences. What they are legally required to meet are county standards, but, based on what he has determined, at least for the homes that are now within the distance, they would meet the lower standard. Mr. Hessler presented graphics what were not included in the original packet for the record. Mr. Krause commented on the national standard which is actually a guideline not a standard and is something they have imposed upon themselves. What they have imposed upon themselves is to meet the national guideline at the nearest residences, but, will meet county code now and in the future when it comes to sound levels anywhere off site. Com. Coward continued to question the developers intention on the sound levels. Mr. Krause restated what they have committed to. The design goal that they have agreed to, is 48 dba to the nearest existing homes, now, if development comes to the area, and if homes are built to the east, they will meet county code. He cannot say what the development to the east will be, if it is commercial, industrial or institutional they will meet county, code. The 48 dba was for residential, he does not know what will be built east of their property line, but, they will meet county code regardless of what is built at that location. PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Alan Sickland, attorney in West Palm Beach, representing TJH presented the Jack Glatting report for the record (attachment 3).. His client owns the 600 acres east of Enron and he has invested several millions of dollars in this property to development a golf course community, hotel and convention center, a town center and single family lots. His client also has a contract to purchase the 2000 acres known as the LTC Ranch. Mr. Sickland's client is in opposition to the project. After Mr. Sickland's comments were made, Com. Hutchinson asked exactly what his client was objecting to. Mr. Sickland stated that is his understanding that this is not a permitted use in an industrial zoning that it is a conditional use and that they would need to file an application for that. Mr. Mike Weinberg, Hydrogeologist submitted a report for the record (attachment 4). Mr. Dick Bellinger, Gold Course Developer addressed the Board regarding this project. Mr. Harold Melville, attorney for LTC Ranch Joint Ventures, addressed the Board on this issue and stated they are not opposed to power plants, however, they should be located in an appropriate location and this is not an appropriate location. -5- Mr. Dan Fuller, Appraiser for the opposing group, addressed the property and his findings. Com. Barnes questioned what it is about this project that would harm their development plans. Mr. Sickland stated this establishes the character of the area and this is the question. Com. Barnes stated he would be more concerned about 1-95 and the landfill this like this as opposed to a power plant you cannot see. Dr. Kenneth Oland, professional Consultant on power issues, addressed the Board in favor of this project due to the demand for powers vs. operating hours. Mr. Victor Garrison, White City resident, addressed the Board in favor of this project. Mr. Paul Freeman , citrus grove owner, addressed the Board in opposition. Ms. Margaret McCorter, Plant Haven Nursery owner, addressed the Board in opposition. Mr. Troy Draughty neighbor to proposed project and grapefruit grower, addressed the Board in opposition to the project. Mr. Scott Williams, representing the property owners of Midway Grove addressed the Board in favor of the project. Mr. Gary McCorter, Plant Haven Nursery owners, addressed the Board in opposition. Mr. Bruce Harper, partner Plant Haven Nursery also addressed the Board in opposition. Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island resident addressed the Board on this issue and he stated he wasn't sure just how many "peakers" the county should permit and where they should be located. Mr. Bill Ferris, taxpayer, addressed the Board in opposition due to his concerns about what it might do to his wells. The Pony Pines Property Owners submitted a petition with signatures in opposition to this proj ect. Com. Hutchinson. requested Board comments and direction if this should be continued on conclude today. Com. Coward stated he felt that it was his personal opinion that they have had excellent discussions this evening from both sides, however, he does not believe that they have received conclusive answers to various legitimate issues and is not in the position to make a determination tonight one way or the other and felt it should be continued to allow for the Board to further review various items they feel important and would like for this to come back at a later date. Com. Lewis concurred and stated there are some questions she would like answered. Com. Coward stated he would prefer the public hearing not be closed so that those who had to leave and were not able to speak would have the opportunity to do so. Com. Barnes stated he did not have a problem with this as long as the presentations are not heard again. 0 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, site plan authorization or other construction approvals for any development on Lot 1, except for those that may be required for or incidental to the development of the Midway Energy Site on Lot 2, a Final PNRD application with supporting documentation must be received and approved by St. Lucie County consistent with applicable regulations and public hearing requirements, except that prior to the presentation of any final development plans to the Board of County Commissioners the Planning and Zoning Commission shall conduct a public hearing to review the proposed final development plans for Lot 1. The granting of any final PNRD approvals for the balance of the Midway site does not obligate the County to future approvals for this portion of the project that would otherwise not be consistent with applicable land use and land development regulations. attachment 1 ..04 WA .. e • NON WN �� 14a. The avorovals aranted under this resolution for final Planned Non-residential Development / MEC are contingent upon the applicant natural pas as its primary fuel source with low sulfur distillate fuel oil as a backup supply. 14b. The maximum number of hours that the MEC 14c. The maximum number of hours that the MEC Facility may operate under fuel oil conditions is 3,000 hours per calendar year. No one single combustion turbine maV operate for more than 1,000 hours each 12 months per calendar Vear. For every hour in excess of 250 hours that a single combustion turbine is run on fuel oil, the total number of aross operatinq hours shall be rnrim-prl by 2 nverall hours. Anv increase in the number of oil operating hours for state and federal air quality permits shall require St. Lucie County Board approval as a modification to the final Planned Non-residential Development Approval for MEC. Part of attachment 1 ..O - ..--- -- - - - ---- - - - GRAPH SHOWING EXPECTED AND REQUIRED SOUND LEVELS AT NINE LOCATIONS WEST OF MIDWAY SITE ¢, 6 EXPECT�D LEVEL ro i1i o - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LOCATION -4- lot CD CD CD CD ro 0 CD ^ lot � � O CD CD O (D I (� A CDCD �- �. � O � O -s- r ( CD O CD CD • CD ' O CD CD . r4 o � �o o•cD 9.2 ..i CD o ('D CD • ` co aCD CD O � � O CD 11 cn v PM o r ro d rt p 00 w CD C D o o o w fIQ ('1 0 o w o v o 0 0 00 o0 w w o ow N o I'D 4�- l0 0) 00 J W C O C� o o W go ono 00 0 i O O Ch LA o Wry C Cy o �h CD C/] S02 Concentration (ug/m3) -� I N IV w W -rP O O O O O O O O, O C+J Q � jo O7 C37 cnn << m CD C" 1 (� CD �. CD ASP O n � cn � cn O CD�- w n w rn CD CD o p � o CD�• l 1 v O O n V ~ • V• FTT�� lY rr -11- REJ cn 0 0 N O c--P t�—t- C• cn aLA ¢I l 0 0 C7 � A a� Lnu CD o 0' F.d Vl ✓Vy C CD ^t CD CD �• C CD aCD CDCD °r o CD a 0 0 0 W OM O W V 1 y� 1 W 00 W rr �O 01 �- M c-r- s D o O' D O O O. U x ro L17 D C D (CD .O. a) n D a 1 N ► c 7 (D � Q. D 7 h O D A j D 1 ao p D w 1 m "Z. o y o n 3 o =- o =r o � o o o cn G ' (D- -s CD NCo � A =� W CD 0 O B J 1 Qp (DM Co p? 01 V m y m 1 co V CO.) Cf0 V (�2 7 m A� x O O v U 3 o O. .1 'U (D 0 3 U O rF t11 CD o x. m o c .a -aowco _ V ocnrn�nom rn w V p Cn V a) �` N c0 "n A y = A y Q. W -e l -13- 1. �- - ..--___._. -. _._.mot:• i. ,..... _.:._ ; l7 s .It _. 1 Mile = 1.5 Feet ` 1/2 Mile = 1.8 Feet:-�� Er° _ c� 1/4 Mile = 2.2 Feet % W11 rzr a tar 1� tE a 1z7 v a ye I Iit/ xu / � 521.,gy�;, a l ....... 1/4 Mile-2 I _\i._ ._ r1/2 Mile CA �FIF ui j ................ r II , Midway Sitef It + JI 19 jV it I I a .�. _ J i t> Theis Model - Minimum Calculated Drawdown R T = 34,800sq.ft/d S = 0.001 - —, kL'K'::-'.. :..-..-:::�•r4MF:1YY"II Y.'+IMM.Pv. Q = 0.864 mgd �^ t = 90 Days j Locus Map Legend: ENRON I --" Q Site Location Midway Energy Center I Site Location 1 i USGSQUPORANGLES St. Lucie County, FloridaEP. ""( — ,. FORT PIERCE Nel FORT PENCE SW - pale Swle 1:24,00D l_ Plate Number February SCCI xaoa r xeaF +aoe tar —14— -is- -16- �%... -. w Assessor's Map MEMORANDUM DATE: March 20, 2001 TO: St. Lucie County Commissioners FROM: Jack Glatting, Principal Glatting Jackson RE: Midway Energy Center Rezoning File Number RZ-00-019, PUD-00-013, MJSP-00-012 GJ Project No. 15870 As representatives of the future LTC Ranch community, we respectfully request denial of file number RZ-00-018, PUD-00-013, MJSP-00-012, application of Midway Energy Center (MEC), for rezoning of 116 acres from the AG-1 (Agriculture - I du/acre) and AG-2.5 (Agriculture - 2.5 du/acre) zoning districts to the Planned Nonresidential Development (PNRD) zoning district and site plan approval of the Midway Energy Center, a proposed 510 megawatt peaking electric generation facility. The proposed rezoning and Midway Energy Center site plan should be denied due to the following: It is inconsistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. It is not a use allowed by right within the Planned Nonresidential Development Zoning District. It is inconsistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. It is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses. It would result in adverse impacts on the natural environment. It does not provide an adequate buffer. It is in the wrong location and does not respect the orderly and logical development pattern of the surrounding community. Each of these issues is addressed below using the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06,03 in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 1. WHETHER THE PROPOSED REZONING IS IN CONFLICT WITH ANY APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. Staff noted in their review that, `The proposed zoning has been determined to not be in conflict ,vith any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.' However. staff identified an open space issue, `Based upon the 35% open space requirement. the applicant is required to designate a minimum of 40.81 acres as open space. The proposed design of the project provides for 39.04 acres of open space during the development of Lot 2. Upon development of Lot I an additional 1.11 acres of land will be required to be designated as open space, in order to fulfill attachment —1— %W *MW the 35% open space requirement for the PNRD Zoning District." POINT: The situ plan does not meet minimum open space requirements. The required 35 % of open space should be provided with development of Lot 2 and it should be allocated in such a way to buffer the Midway Energy Center from approved and future adjacent mixed use communities to the south and east, and from the adjacent rural residence to the west. The minimum open space requirement is in place to provide for "common open space, which may include parks, recreation areas, bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities, marinas, swimming beaches, common open space, common landscaping or planting areas, or other areas of pubic purposes." (LDC Sec 7.02.03) The committed area for open space on Lot 3 of the subject property has little benefit. It does not provide recreation or any other type of public purpose, nor does it provide a buffer. The minimum open space requirements should be met and it should be reallocated to provide beneficial open space and appropriate buffers. POINT: The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with Land Development Code. The amendment is not consistent with the purpose of the PNRD District. "The PNRD District is intended to achieve non-residential land development of superior quality through the encouragement offlexibility and creativity in design options that: A. Permit creative approaches to the development of non-residential land reflecting changes in the technology of land development. B. Allow for the efficient use oflond, which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and thereby lower development costs. C. Allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character, compatible with surrounding land uses. D. Permit the enhancement ofneighborhoods through the preservation ofnatural features, the provision of underground utilities, and the provision of recreation areas and open space. (LDC See7.02.01) The proposed use of the subject property by a merchant power plant does not fulfill the intent of the PNRD District. It does not utilize a creative approach nor does it propose a mix of uses. It does not allow for the efficient use of land. The open space provided is inadequate and non - beneficial. The design of the plant provides inadequate buffering to the east and west and will be incompatible with the proposed community to the south. Utilities will not only not be underground, but will be the sole use of the property, visible from adjacent lands. And finally, the plant will not enhance, but rather substantially damage the character of the area. POINT: The Midway Energy Center is not allowed by right within the Planned Non-residential Development Zoning District. A Conditional Use Permit is required. The proposed Midway Energy Center is considered an "electric generation plant." This use is onl} allowed as a Conditional Use within the Utilities Zoning District. It is not allowed in the Light Industrial (IL) or the Heavy Industrial (IH) Zoning Districts. Section 7.02.02 lists the non-residential permitted uses. The code allows within those listed use. -2- *40� 1.w "any permitted, conditional or accessory use, including any standards, conditions and requirements for those uses." The conditional use then applies. A conditional use permit must be obtained for this use to be allowed. 2. WHETHER THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Staff states in their review that, "The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed preliminary PNRD amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan." "In addition, the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed partial final PNRD approval for the electrical power plant project is also consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan." Staff, however, did not conduct or discuss an analysis of comprehensive plan consistency. POINT: The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the intent of the Mixed Use Land Use designation. The Comprehensive Plan states that in an area designated as mixed use, a development proposed that is not "compliant with the identified intensity classification, any change in zoning shall be to the Planned Unit Development (PUD), Planned Non-residential Development (PNRD), or Mixed Use Development (MXD)." Nothing in the PNRD district suggests this district is intended to be used for a large single purpose land use. This electric generation use is clearly permitted in a utility zoning classification. A comprehensive plan amendment would be needed along with a change in zoning. POINT: The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Map The Comprehensive Plan adopted by the County identifies Industrial and Utilities Land Uses where power generation plants and other industrial uses are appropriate. The proposed Midway Energy Center is not located in one of these areas. It is located in a Mixed Use land use category. This Mixed Use land use category allows industrial and utility uses with a limit on intensity. Public Service/Utility land uses are allowed in the Mixed Use land use category, but the intensity of this land use is half of the allowable intensity of residential and institutional. office and commercial uses. The intent of allowing public service and utility types of uses in this district is not stated, but is arguably allowed as a support use to serve the other community oriented uses. As stated in Policy 1.1.5,13, `Local utility services (i.e., electric substations, wastewater lift stations. telecommunication sites and other small scale utility service operations) necessary to provide for the utility service needs of the planned development area, may be approved without the need to amend the Future Land Use Element so long as the property on which the activity is to take place is less than 5 acres in total area." POINT: The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the Low Intensity Mixed Use Development Area Land Use category. The Comprehensive Plan establishes Mixed Use Activity Areas. Use intensity definitions are given in Policy 1.1.73 as follows: 1) High Intensity development areas may include the following types of land uses: —3— ..00 Residential Institutional Professional Service/Office General Commercial Public Service/Utility Industrial 5 to 15 du/acres 1.5 FAR 1.5 FAR 1.0 FAR .5 FAR .5 FAR 2) Medium Intensity development areas may include the following types of land uses Residential 5 to 9 du/acres Institutional 1.0 FAR Professional Service/Office 1.0 FAR General Commercial .75 FAR Public Service/Utility .25 FAR Industrial .25 FAR 3) Low Intensity development areas may include the following types of land uses: Residential Not to exceed 5 du/acres Institutional .5 FAR Professional Service/Office .5 FAR General Commercial .5 FAR Public Service/Utility .25 FAR The subject property is within the Midway/Glades Mixed Use Activity Area. The Midway/Glades Mixed Use Activity Area is defined with high, medium, and low intensity areas radiating out in intensity from the intersection of I-95 and Midway Road. Low intensity uses define the outer edge of the Mixed Use Activity Area. The subject property is located within a Low Intensity development area. Policy 1.1.7.3 mandates that a formal mixed use zoning designation be incorporated into the Land Development Code that further defines the performance standards governing the mix and intensity of the land uses within it. The policy is stated as follows: Policy 1.1.7.3 St. Lucie County shall by August 1990, incorporate into its Land Development Regulations a formal Mixed use (MXD) zoning designation permitting both residential and non-residential development within a single planned development. These district regulations shall contain specific performance standards governing the mix and intensity of the land uses within it. The Planned Mixed Use Development zoning designation was established to further define the mil and intensities of the Mixed Use Activity Area. The Low Intensity regulations are of particular relevance because the subject property is located in a Low Intensity development area. Section 7.03.02 defines the permitted uses for low intensity development areas as follows: Any permitted use as identified in the Residential, Estate-1 (RE-1), Residential, Estate-2 (RE-2); Residential, Single-Family-2 (RS-2); Residential, Single-Family-3 (RS-3); Residential, Single-Family-4 (RE-4); Residential, Multiple-Familv-5 (RM-5); Residential, Mobile Home-5 (RMH-5); Commercial, Neighborhood (CN); Commercial Once (CO): Commercial General (CG); Industrial, Light; or HIRD zoning districts of this Code, any accessory use specified in the final PMUD, and any conditional use specified in the final PMUD, subject to the requirements of Section 11.07.00 and am other special requirement as set forth in this Code may be permitted in anv area designated Low Intensity Mixed Use Development to the extent consistent with the faure —4— Land Use designations of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The low intensity development area does not allow utility uses. A comprehensive plan amendment to amend the, land use to medium or high intensity is necessary to allow the utility use. POINT: The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. As stated in the Future Land Use Element, "Integral to the success of the Comprehensive Plan are the Goals, Objective, and Policies which will be used to direct the location and intensity of development for the variety of uses necessaryfor a healthy and diversified community. " Goal 1.1 Ensure a high quality living environment through a mixture of land uses that will enhance St. Lucie County's natural and manmade resources while minimizing any threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the County's citizens through incompatible land user and environmental degradation. Point - Residential and utility uses are allowed in the same land use category, Mixed Use, but that does not mean that the uses should be allowed to locate next to each other. The uses are not compatible. The Future Land Use Element addresses this compatibility issue in several policies. "Uses within the areas classified as Mixed Use should be segregated as to intensity and indicated in the form of a concept master plan. " Point - Normally, an applicant for a very high intensity land use is expected to accommodate a transition of intensity on the applicant's site. The very small area of the plant (28 acres), and the remoteness of the open space does not allow this to be achieved. Criteria to be used in the development of Mixed Use areas includes the following: "All uses shall be compatible with internal and external adjacent land uses. Objective 1.1.2 Provide in the land development regulations provisions for a compatible and coordinated land uses pattern which establishes agriculture as the primary use outside of the urban service boundary and promote retention ofagricultural activities, preserve natural resources and maintain native vegetative habitats. Point - The approval of the power plant will disrupt the compatible and coordinated land use pattern in the area. (See land use pattern argument below) Objective 1.1. 4 Require through the County's Land Development Regulations, specific performance criteria (ie. Landscaping and use separation standards, TDR's), that all new development be compatible with surrounding land uses, both existing and fiaure as represented in this Element. Point - All new development must be compatible with surrounding land uses. Performance criteria are not used. The uses are not separated. Buffers are inadequate. Objective 1.1.7 Future development and redevelopment activities shall be directed to those areas depicted with urban land use designations on the Future Land Use Map and are to be consistent with sound planning principles contained in the goals, objectives, and policies of this plan. —5— **W M Point - This development is not consistent with the sound planning principles contained in the goals, objectives, and policies of this plan. Objective 1.1.8. The protection of the single family neighborhood as a defined residential area form the encroachment of commercial and/or other inappropriate land uses will be provided for through the Land Development Regulations. Point - The approval of this rezoning allows an inappropriate land use to encroach upon the approved residential neighborhood. Policy 1.1.8.5 Require effective visual and light diffusion barriers between residential and non- residential user. Point - The buffers are inadequate. Policy 1.1.8.10 Encourage the use of existing commercial and industrial designated lands within the urban service are, through requiring a strict demonstration ofservice availability, before authorizing Land Use and Zoning amendments in areas not presently indicated as having such a designation. Point - There are available lands within areas that do not need land use or zoning amendments. This is demonstrated through the fact that Enron's competitors all are looking at sites that are located in areas that are appropriate. It is also demonstrated by the following statement made in the Comprehensive Plan: "The Future Land Use Map designates more land use acreage than is projected to be required to accommodate the minimum year 2015 population needs. Additional urban land uses have been included: 1. To provide choice of location; 2. To be able to take into account environmental constraints; and 3. To recognize site specific limitations. " Policy 1.1.9.11 Require, through the County's land development regulations new urban type developments near agricultural areas to avoid adverse impacts on the natural resources essential to production of crops and citrus. Point - The approved LTC Planned Development is appropriate in the Mixed Use district bordering the agricultural area, but the utility use is not. It will have adverse impacts on the agricultural areas. 3. WHETHER AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PROPOSED CHANGE IN ZONING IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES. Staff notes, "This proposed change in zoning and the accompan an Preliminary Planned Nonresidential Development site plan modifies the existing development pattern in this area of the Countv." Again, however, no analysis is given as to the consistency with existing and proposed land uses. I1 only notes that the parcel is appropriate for a Mixed Use development as determined by the Future I M. ILM ..+ Land Use Map. POINT: The proposed Midway Energy Center is inconsistent with existing development. The Comprehensive Plan shows that a transition of land uses from high to low intensity is the intended development pattern. This proposed use will reverse the land use pattern, placing a high intensity use on the outer edge of the urban service boundary where low intensity uses are intended. The staff even states that the zoning change will modify the existing development pattern from agricultural to industrial. West of I-95 is very rural, with scattered residents, orange groves, pasture land, and some truck traffic. It has a lazy, peaceful feel. There are no industrial uses on the north side of Midway Road west of I-95. The only industrial use visible in the area is the FP&L Substation adjacent to I-95, The power plant would be better located east of I-95 in the Glades Cut-off area. East of I-95 is very industrial, with lots of vacant land suitable for additional industrial uses, and heavy truck traffic. No land use or zoning changes would be necessary in this area. POINT: The proposed Midway Energy Center is inconsistent with proposed land uses. The proposed merchant power plant will not be compatible with the approved LTC Ranch residential development or with any other future mixed -use developments in the Mixed Use Activity Area. The Midway Energy Center will be a single utility use incompatible with the approved uses in the Mixed Use Activity Area and inconsistent with the mixed -use concept. The development of the Midway Energy Center will have a great influence over the whole area, encouraging the development of more scattered industrial uses. Because the Midway Energy Center is a single utility use, the area is likely to become solely industrial in nature. If it is the desire of the Commission that this area be industrial, then the land use should not be a Mixed Use Activity Area. The Comprehensive Plan should be modified and appropriately zoned after a study of the area. 4. NA 5. NA G. WHETHER AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT. Staff recognizes that "The proposed amendment will create a certain amount of adverse impacts on the natural environment." Noise and emission issues are addressed. Staff concludes however, that "project emissions arc all less than allowed within EPA regulations... the proposed plant is expected to have an insignificant impact on air quality." And "There will be no significant impact on the surrounding properties by the noise emissions from the electric generation plant." POINT: An inadequate buffer is provided. Noise at the propervY is at the County maximum. The open space buffer proposed in the site plan is located north of the proposed electric generation plant. This open space has little benefit. The primary use to the north is an attenuation facility. —7— %.✓ `0 An alternative would be to exchange the power plant land uses proposed on lot 2 with the open space land uses on lot 3. 7. WHETHER AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD RESULT IN AN ORDERLY AND LOGICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFYING ANY NEGATIVE AFFECTS OF SUCH PATTERNS. The staff notes that the "subject site is designated with a MXD - Midway Road Future Land Use Map designation which permits the increase in development intensity through a variety of uses. The proposed preliminary PNRD [with a large single use electric generation plant] will provide for a change in the overall development pattern in the surrounding area." "The general character of the surrounding properties will change from agricultural to a more industrial character." No statements or analyses are made as to whether this pattern change is appropriate or not. This is a very important land use policy that should be carefully considered. POINT: Wrong Location. The proposed amendment will result in an illogical development pattern with negative effects on the area. The pattern of development from cast to west is as follows: There is a highly concentrated industrial section from Glades Cut-off to the Turnpike. West of the Turnpike is a Mixed Use Activity Area, which forms the urban service boundary. Beyond this urban boundary is all rural/agricultural lands consisting of orange groves, pasture lands and scattered residences. It has a lazy, peaceful feel with some truck traffic. The only industrial use visible in the area is the FPL Substation adjacent to I-95. The power plant is proposed in the Mixed Use Activity Area, which has approvals for a new predominantly residential community. The residential community and this proposed industrial use are not compatible. Industrial uses such as a power plant are obviously most appropriate in the Industrial and Utility land use categories. The industrial area east of I-95 has ample available vacant land suitable for industrial uses and heavy truck traffic. S. WHETHER THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD BE IN CONFLICT WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND IS IN HARMONY WITH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THIS CODE. Staff states, "The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The PNRD Zoning District provides opportunities that allow for the development of more intense uses." POINT: There is a direct conflict with public interest. We disagree. The approved residential community and this proposed industrial use are not compatible. POINT: Several other proposed merchant power plants are planned in the area. 10 St. Lucie County is currently served by a nuclear power plant located on Hutchinson Island, and a power plant located in downtown Ft. Pierce. The downtown Ft. Pierce power plant was recently bought by Duke. Duke is working to rebuild the plant and to integrate the plant into the community better. False facades around the plant will most likely be built. Sites for future or rumored power plants are listed below: Co. Location Zoning Land Use Enron Midway Rd AG-1 & AG-2 Mixed Use Duke Midway Industrial Park U (Utility) Industrial Panda FPL Substation IH Mixed Use CTV LTC Ranch in Pt. St. Lucie Pt. St. Lucie Pt. St. Lucie Decker LTC Ranch in Pt. St. Lucie Pt. St. Lucie Pt. St. Lucie The Duke plant has a conditional use permit and is located in an appropriately zoned area. The Panda plant has a heavy industrial land use and is located adjacent to the FPL Substation' The CTV & Decker plants are located in Pt. St. Lucie in appropriate areas east of I-95. CONCLUSION We believe the County should deny this application based upon the above statements and adhere to the Comprehensive Plan and desired development patterns planned for this area. If this application is approved, it would be arbitrarily reshaping the character of this area. 3116E Water Resource Sol tions 428 fine Island Road SW . Cana r....i 941574-1919 Fax: 941574.8106 March 16, 2001 Mr. Cap Cain 17075 Hammock Lane Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987 Re: Midway Energy Center Water Use Permit Application Issues of Concern Dear Mr. Cain: Water Resource Solutions has reviewed the Water Use Permit Application submitted by ENSR, on behalf of Enron, for the above referenced project (Permit Application No. 010112-6). We have identified two main areas of concern regarding the proposed groundwater withdrawal that could result in adverse impact to existing groundwater users. One concern is that the proposed withdrawal could significantly impair the ability of existing users to withdraw water at the rates required to meet their own demands. Groundwater from the Floridan aquifer in the region cannot be pumped, but must be withdrawn under natural artesian pressure. The hydraulic head in the aquifer is about 20 feet above land surface in the project area. The flow capacity of a well completed in the aquifer will decrease proportionally as the artesian pressure declines. Flow will cease completely if the pressure drops to land surface elevation. The results of a computer -generated groundwater flow model developed to predict the amount of drawdown that will occur as a result of the proposed 0.864 mgd withdrawal for the power plant was included by ENSR in the permit application. The drawdown values predicted by the consultant's model using the more conservative input parameters simulated are listed in the attached table. These results indicate that drawdown could range from 5.66 feet at a distance of 0.25 miles from the proposed wells to 2.56 feet 3 miles from the site. Since the head available for well flow is only 20 feet (the artesian pressure in the area), the drawdown caused by this withdraw could adversely impact existing water users ability to meet their demands. The approximate flow reductions to existing users at varying distances from the Enron site, based on the model results, are presented in the table. It is our understanding that future groundwater requirements for the power plant could be in the range of 6 mgd or more. Using the same aquifer parameters as those supplied by 04219LMW.C1601.wpd attachment 4 on IYIQI UI I I U, LUU I Page 2 i✓ ENSR, Water Resource Solutions performed additional groundwater flow model simulations to predict the drawdown that could result from a 6 mgd withdrawal from the Floridan aquifer at the site. These results, which are also presented in the attached table, demonstrate that significant impact could occur throughout a broad area if the conceptualization of the aquifer used by Enron's consultant is reasonably accurate. The second area of concern is that the proposed withdrawal for the power plant could cause groundwater quality in the upper Floridan aquifer to deteriorate with time. The upper Floridan aquifer is separated from much more mineralized groundwater in the lower Floridan aquifer by very leaky geologic strata. When water from the upper Floridan aquifer is withdrawn from wells, it is mainly replenished by upward leakage of deeper groundwater. Results of a regional groundwater flow model prepared by the South Florida Water Management District (Lukasiewicz, 1992) indicate that upward leakage of water ultimately supplies about 90 percent of the water that recharges the upper Floridan aquifer in the region. This deeper groundwater that recharges the main production zone contains much higher concentrations of dissolved solids. The proposed withdrawal by the applicant could therefore cause water quality in the production zone to deteriorate and adversely impact existing users. We hope that this letter addresses the questions that you had. Please call if you have any other questions. Sincerely, I11-414U,� ichael Weinberg, P.G. Senior Hydrogeologist JMW/gng encls. 04219LMW.C1601.wpd -2- hat km 0 O p N p N CD O O O O O O co N 3 U O O � O O � .y C O M N Co M O ) M N N O 0 0 C Z. O •V U O � Z N N Z U O O N LU LL c� E .y C 10 O .Y M N 00 Oco p` U N N H �_ N N N o E E E 0 to N O M O O '- -3- _Water (duality Degradation Concerns Well Schematic 0- Surficial Aquifer ----------- 200 - I Low Permeability Clay 400 II w U d 600 - a 800 -1 w ;ToVery Leaky 1000 - Semi -Confining Strata 1200 I I I 1400 1600 6Ynler Rexnurre Snluiinns -4- v M The County Attorney stated that staff will need to address Mr. Gattlings comments. It was the consensus of the Board to continue this public hearing on April 3, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon there after as possible. 6. This item was pulled. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Clerk of Circuit Court Chairman 7- %1W CM Y� Table of Calculations to Determine an Acceptable Design Goal per ANSI 13133.8: Normalized Acceptable Level in Urban Environments: Site Specific Adjustments: 1, Seasonal 2, Operational Cycle 3. Existing Background 4. Sound Character Sum of Adjustments: Acceptable Design Goal for Actual Site Conditions: Ldn=55 0 (Winter or Summer -Open Windows) 0 (16 hours/day Typical) -7 (Normal Suburban) 0 (Broadband, w/o Tones) -7 48 dBA Table showing Expected Sound Level at Locations 1 through 9 on Figure 1A Location Expected Energy Center Sound Level 1 1-10100 West Midway Rd. 43 2 2-10200 West Midway (Closest Residence) 48 3 3-10300 West idway 44 4 4-10400 West Midway 41 5 5-10450 West Midway 39 6 6-10500 West Midway 41 7 7-10897 West Midway 37 8 8-10897 West Midway, roadway shoulder 38 9 9-10185 Muller Road 30 —3— yw r.. AGENDA REQUEST REVISED TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB ITEM NO. A-1 DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin SUBJECT: Early Redemption of Special Assessment. Improvement Bonds, Series 1996 BACKGROUND: The attached letter from Mr. Leedy, Financial Advisor to the County indicates there are funds available in the Becker Road MSBU debt service fund which are excess to the debt service needs. Accordingly, Mr. Leedy recommends, and OMB staff concur, that $280,000 be used to redeem bonds scheduled to mature on November 1" for the years 2007 through 2009 plus $55,000 of those due to mature November 1, 2010. This action will reduce the interest cost of the issue to the property owners. In order to redeem the bonds on May 1, 2001, staff must notify the Paying Agents and depositories of the Board's intent by April 1, 2001. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 235-9950-571000-800 Principal -Bonds (Becker Road MSBU Debt Service Fund) PREVIOUS ACTION: March 14, 2000 - The Board approved the early call of $300,000 in bonds for this same issue RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the early redemption of the $1,860,000 St. Lucie County, Florida, Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1996 (Becker Road MSBU), at par, as recommended by Mr. Leedy and as outlined above. COMMISSION ACTION: [ Xj APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Doug Anderson County Administrator Coo rd i n ati o n/S ig natures County Attorney: XX � Management & Budget: XX Purchasing: Other: Public Works: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX G:%BUDGE1 WP\AGENDA'S�Agenda0 I M'27_Becker Caliwpd William R. )'eugh & U. LANDMARK CENTER II SUITE 465 225 E. ROBINSON STREET ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801 (407) 422-5161 FAX (407) 422-5659 March 14, 20001 Ms. Marie Gouin Management and Budget Manager St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FI 34982-5652 Re: $1,860.000 St. Lucie County, Florida Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1996 (Becker Road MSBU) Dear Marie: f f' The above -referenced special assessment bond issue is currently, outstanding in the principal amount of $1,240,000. Based on information provided by the Finance Department, sinking fund monies available to pay debt service currently total $355,852.97. After payment of the May 1, 2001 interest payment and the November 1, 2001 principal and interest payments, surplus funds of approximately $285,019.22 will be available to redeem bonds, at par, on May 1, 2001. This is a conservative figure because it is also expected that additional assessments will be collected prior to June 1, 2001. $355,852.97 Current sinking fund -39,802.50 Less 5/1/01 interest payment -31,031.25 Less 11/1/01 interest payment $285,019.22 Available to redeem bonds -280,000.00 Redeem bonds 5/1/2001 $5,019.22 Cash Balance We recommend that $280,000 of this surplus be utilized to redeem bonds, at par, on May 1, 2001. This would include calling the principal balances for November 1, 2007 through 2009, plus $55,000 of the 2010 maturity. This would leave an outstanding principal balance of $960,000 on the issue at May 1, 2001. Notice of this early redemption would need to be made by April 1, 2001, pursuant to the bond resolution. U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Services, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, serves as paying ageat- for this issue. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, WILLIAM R. HOUGH & CO. Loomis C. Leedy, III First Vice President LCL: mkr cc: Christann K. Hartley INVESTMENTS SINCE 1962 MEMBER NASDlSIPC ar BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS March 20, 2001 Mr. Scott Schuhle, Senior Vice President U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Services Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Re: $1,860,000 St. Lucie County, Florida Special Assessment Improvement Bonds Series 1996 (Becker Road MSBU) n MANAGEMENT & BUDGET MANAGER HARVEY M. LINCOLN TRANSMISSION BY FAX TO (954) 776-2629; HARD COPY TO FOLLOW Dear Mr. Schuhle, St. Lucie County currently has $280,000 in surplus funds in its debt service sinking fund for the above referenced bond issue. This surplus is over and above the scheduled interest payment that is due on May 1, 2001. On the advice of Mr. Loomis Leedy, III, our Financial Advisor, please initiate actions to redeem at par the following bonds from the Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1996: Maturity Principal Interest November 1 Amount Rate 2007 40,000 6.10% 2008 90,000 6.20% 2009 95,000 6.375% 2010 55,000 6.375% Please ensure that this early redemption is advertised no later than April 1, 2001 so that the bonds can be called as noted on May 1, 2001. I am also notifying the Finance Department to forward to you $280,000 in addition to the regularly scheduled interest payments of S39,802.50 which is due on May 1, 2001. Unless I hear otherwise, the check for $319,802.50 will be forwarded to: IOHN D. DRUHN. Disrricr No. 1 • DOUG COWARD. Disrncr No. 2 • PAULA A. LEWIS. Disrricr No. 9 • FRANNIE HUTCHINSON. District No. 4 • CLIFF DARNES, District No. 5 Counry Adminisrrotor - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue • Fr. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 • Phone (561) 462-1670 TDD (561) 462-1428 • FAX (561) 462-2362 ..+ U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. Corporate -Trust Debt Management CM-9705 P.O. Box 70870 St. Paul, MN 55170-9705 I appreciate your prompt attention to our request. Sincerely, Marie M. Gouin Management & Budget Director cc: Chris Hartley. Finance Director Diane Bernardo, Bond Accountant Bill Leedy. Financial Advisor Robert Freeman, Bond Counsel Doug Anderson, County Administrator Daniel J. McIntyre, County Attorney 'N NOW AGENDA REQUEST REVISE® TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB ITEM NO. A-2 DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR ( ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT (X ] PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin SUBJECT: Early Redemption of Special Assessment.lmprovement Bonds, Series 1998 BACKGROUND: The attached letter from Mr. Leedy, Financial Advisor to the County indicates there are funds available in the South Hutchinson Island Wastewater System debt service fund which are excess to the debt service needs. Accordingly, Mr. Leedy recommends, and OMB staff concur, that $650,000 be used to redeem $360,000 in bonds scheduled to mature on November 1s` 2004 and $290,000 of those due to mature November 1, 2005.This action will reduce the interest cost of the issue to the County. In order to redeem the bonds on May 1, 2001, staff must notify the Paying Agents and depositories of the Board's intent by April 1, 2001. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are currently available in fund 674 - South Hutchinson Trust Fund PREVIOUS ACTION: March 14, 2000 - The Board approved the early call of $550,000 in bonds for this same issue RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Boardapprove the early redemption of the $14,920,000 St. Lucie County, Florida, Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998 (South Hutchinson Island Wastewater System), at par, as recommended by Mr. Leedy and as outlined above COMMISSION ACTION: [ Xj APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Other: CONCURRENCE: 1' 4�` Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Management & Budget: X W7 Purchasing: Public Works: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX 1% William R hough & U. Iwo LANDMARK CENTER II SUITE 465 225 E. ROBINSON STREET ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801 (407) 422-5161 FAX (407) 422-5659 Ms. Marie Gouin Management and Budget Manager St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FI 34982-5652 March 14, 20001 Re: $14.920,000 St. Lucie County, Florida + 5 2M Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998 (South Hutchinson Island Wastewater System) Dear Marie: The above -referenced special assessment bond issue is currently, outstanding in the principal amount of $13,320,000. Based on information provided by the Finance Department, sinking fund monies available to pay debt service currently total $1,283.831. After payment of the May 1, 2001 interest payment and the November 1, 2001 interest payment, surplus funds of approximately $650,000 will be available to redeem bonds, at par, on May 1, 2001. This is a conservative figure because it is also expected that additional assessments will be collected prior to June 1, 2001. $1.283,831 Current sinking fund -323,444 Less 511/01 interest payment -309,884 Less 11/1101 interest payment $650,503 Available to redeem bonds -650,000 Redeem bonds 5/1I2001 $503 Cash Balance We recommend that $650,000 of this surplus be utilized to redeem bonds, at par, on May 1, 2001. This would include calling 360.000 bonds due November 1, 2004 and $290,000 bonds due November 1, 2005. This would leave an outstanding principal balance of $12,670,000 on the issue at May 1, 2001. Notice of this early redemption would need to be made by April 1, 2001, pursuant to the bond resolution. First Union National Bank, Jacksonville, Florida, serves as paying agent for this issue. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, WILLIAM R. HOUGH & CO. Loomis C. Leedy, III First Vice President LCL:mkr cc: Christann K. Hartley INVESTMENTS SINCE 1962 MEMBER NASD/SIPC BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS March 20, 2001 Ms. Sheila Wallbridge First Union National Bank 200 South Biscayne Blvd Miami, FL 33131 Re: $14,920,000 St. Lucie County, Florida Special Assessment Improvement Bonds Series 1998 (South Hutchinson Island Wastewater System) %1 MANAGEMENT & BUDGET MANAGER HARVEY M. LINCOLN TRANSMISSION BY FAX TO (305) 789-4678; HARD COPY TO FOLLOW Dear Ms. Wallbridge, St. Lucie County currently has $650,000 in surplus funds in its debt service sinking fund for the above referenced bond issue. This surplus is over and above the scheduled interest payment that is due on May 1, 2001. On the advice of Mr. Loomis Leedy, III, our Financial Advisor, please initiate actions to redeem, at par, the following bonds from the Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998: Maturity Principal Interest November 1 Amount Rate 2004 360,000 4.15% 2005 290,000 4.20% Please ensure that this early redemption is advertised no later than April 1, 2001 so that the bonds can be called as noted on May 1, 2001. I am also notifying the Finance Department to forward to you $650,000 in addition to the regularly scheduled interest payments of $323,444 which is due on May 1, 2001. Unless I hear otherwise, the check for $973,444 will be forwarded to: JOIN D. BRUHN. Disrncr No. 1 • DOUG COWARD. Dismor No 2 • PAULA A. LEWIS, Districr No. 3 • FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No. 4 • CLIFF BARNES, District No. 5 Counry Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue • Fr. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 • Phone (561) 462-1670 TDD (561) 462-1428 • FAX (561) 462-2362 rr First Union National Bank Corporate Trust Operations 1525 West W.T. Harris Blvd, 3C3 Charlotte, NC 28288-1153 I appreciate your prompt attention to our request. Sincerely, Marie M. Gouin Management & Budget Director cc: Chris Hartley. Finance Director Diane Bernardo, Bond Accountant Bill Leedy. Financial Advisor Robert Freeman, Bond Counsel Doug Anderson, County Administrator Daniel J. McIntyre, County Attorney v AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB r.+ ITEM NO. A-3 DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin SUBJECT: Early Redemption of Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998A BACKGROUND: The attached letter from Mr. Leedy, Financial Advisor to the County indicates there are funds available in the South Hutchinson Island - North District Wastewater System debt service fund which are excess to the debt service needs. Accordingly, Mr. Leedy recommends, and OMB staff concur, that $50,000 be used to redeem $20,000 in bonds scheduled to mature on November 112008 and 2009 and $10,000 of those due to mature November 1, 2010. This action will reduce the interest cost of the issue to the County. In order to redeem the bonds on May 1, 2001, staff must notify the Paying Agents and depositories of the Board's intent by April 1, 2001. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are currently available in fund 674 - South Hutchinson Trust Fund PREVIOUS ACTION: March 14, 2000 - The Board approved the early call of $105,000 in bonds for this same issue RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the early redemption of the $910,000 St. Lucie County, Florida, Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998 (South Hutchinson Island - North District Wastewater System), at par, as recommended by Mr. Leedy and as outlined above COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Coordination/Sionatures CONCURRENCE: Doug Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: XX Management $ Budget: XX Purchasing: Other: Public Works: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX G:gBUDGETW%AGENDNSWgenda01W327_SHM Gllmpd William L.wough &Cod LANDMARK CENTER II SUITE 465 225 E. ROBINSON STREET ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801 (407) 422-5161 FAX (407) 422-5659 Ms. Marie Gouin Management and Budget Manager St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FI 34982-5652 Re: $910,000 St. Lucie County, Florida Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998A (South Hutchinson Island — North District Wastewater System) Dear Marie: March 14, 20001 1520 The above -referenced special assessment bond issue is currently, outstanding in the principal amount of $655,000. Based on information provided by the Finance Department, sinking fund monies available to pay debt service currently total $98.610.97. After payment of the May 1, 2001 interest payment and the November 1, 2001 interest payment, surplus funds of approximately $54,510 will be available to redeem bonds, at par, on May 1, 2001. This is a conservative figure because it is also expected that additional assessments will be collected prior to June 1, 2001. $98,610.97 Current sinking fund -22,925.00 Less 5/1/01 interest payment -21,175.00 Less 11/1/01 interest payment $54,510.97 Available to redeem bonds -50,00000 Redeem bonds 5/1/2001 $4,510.97 Cash Balance We recommend that $50,000 of this surplus be utilized to redeem bonds, at par, on May 1, 2001. This would include calling the principal amount of bonds due November 1, 2008 through 2009, plus an additional $10,000 due November 1, 2010. This would leave an outstanding principal balance of $605,000 on the issue at May 1, 2001. Notice of this early redemption would need to be made by April 1, 2001, pursuant to the bond resolution. U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Services, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, serves as paying agent for this issue. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, WILLIAM R. HOUGH & CO. Loomis C. Leedy, III First Vice President LCL:mkr cc: Christann K. Hartley MEMBER NASD/S[PC INVESTMENTS SINCE 1962 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS March 20, 2001 Mr. Scott Schuhle, Senior Vice President U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Services Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 ..o MANAGEMENT & BUDGET Re: $910,000 St. Lucie County, Florida Special Assessment Improvement Bonds Series 1998A (South Hutchinson Island - North District Wastewater System) MANAGER HARVEY M. LINCOLN TRANSMISSION BY FAX TO (954) 776-2629; HARD COPY TO FOLLOW Dear Mr. Schuhle, St. Lucie County currently has $50,000 in surplus funds in its debt service sinking fund for the above referenced bond issue. This surplus is over and above the scheduled interest payment that is due on May 1, 2001. On the advice of Mr. Loomis Leedy, III, our Financial Advisor, please initiate actions to redeem at par the following bonds from the Special Assessment Improvement Bonds, Series 1998A: Maturity Principal Interest November 1 Amount Rate 2008 20,000 7.00% 2009 20,000 7.00% 2010 10,000 7.00% Please ensure that this early redemption is advertised no later than April 1, 2001 so that the bonds can be called as noted on May 1, 2001. I am also notifying the Finance Department to forward to you $50,000 in addition to the regularly scheduled interest payments of S22,925 which is due on May 1, 2001. Unless I hear otherwise, the check for $72,925 will be forwarded to: U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. Corporate -Trust Debt Management CM-9705 P.O. Box 70870 St. Paul, MN 55170-9705 JOHN D. DRUHN, Disrricr No. 1 • DOUG COWARD, Disrricr No. 2 • PAULA A. LEWIS. Disrricr No. J • FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No. 4 • CLIFF BARNES, District No. 5 County Adminisrroror - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginio Avenue • Fr. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 • Phone (561) 462-1670 TDD (561) 462-1428 • FAX (561) 462-2362 llft. I appreciate your prompt attention to our request. Sincerely, Marie M. Gouin Management & Budget Director cc: Chris Hartley. Finance Director Diane Bernardo, Bond Accountant Bill Leedy. Financial Advisor Robert Freeman, Bond Counsel Doug Anderson, County Administrator Daniel J. McIntyre, County Attorney `'i MARCH 27, 2001 9:00 AM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA PI'EMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON -AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. Im BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.stlucieco.gov AGENDA March 27, 2001 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE John D. Bruhn District I Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson District 4 Cliff Barnes District 5 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held March 20, 2001. 2. PROCI.AMATION/PRESENTATION Doug Anderson, County Administrator, will introduce David Rodriguez, Human Resources Director. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS SA. There are no public hearings scheduled for March 27, 2001 End of Public Hearings 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Project No. 01-00106 / Resolution No. 01-013 / Qualified Target Industry Business Tax Refund Applicant - Pursuant to S.288.106 Flprida Statutes, staff recommends that the Board pass Resolution No. 01-013 recommending that Project Number 01- 00106 be approved as a Qualified Target Industry Business Tax Refund applicant. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board action taken by the Board at these meetings v to ensure that a verbatim record of the proc individuals testifying during a hearing w.1 opportunity to cross-examine an individual Managergat (561) 462 accommodation TDD (561) 41 person who decides to gs and for such purpos f of any party to. the p County priorfo ..+ REGULAR AGENDA MARCH 27, 2001 PAGE TWO 7. COUNTY ATTORNEY Indrio North Savannas / Florida Communities Trust Project - Staff will update the Board with the status of the project. 8. ADMINISTRATION Bi-weekly Committee Reports - The Board will give updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on. CONSENT AGENDA March 27, 2001 WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 25 PARKS & RECREATION A. River Park Marina Floating Dock Permit - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to apply for a floating dock permit for River Park Marina and allow enhancement to docking facilities. B. Equipment Request No. 01-241- Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment request for the purchase of a football field marking machine in the amount of $1,027 for use at the South County Regional Stadium. C. Budget Amendment No. 01-134 / yquipment Request No. 01-244 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request to purchase a new computer in the amount of $1,598 for the Education Specialist at the Environmental Learning Center. PUBLIC WORKS A. Solid Waste / Cost Accounting Report for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Solid Waste Division to publish, the Solid Waste Full Cost Accounting Report for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, in a newspaper of general circulation. B. Grant Application - Consider staff recommendation to approve the submission of a grant application to Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) in the amount of $250,000 to be used at South Causeway Island, and approve the resolution for assistance under the Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program. C. Solid Waste / Change Order No. 2 and Final Payment / Class 1, Cell 3A Construction and Leachate Force Main Relocation Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the change order and final payment to Sheltra & Son Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $167,869.76, bringing the new contract amount to $2,086,700.81. This amount is $69,883.69 less than the contract amount approved on October 10, 2000. D. Solid Waste / Equipment Purchase - Consider staff recommendation to approve the purchase of one used trailer and two used tandem converter dollies in the amount of $15,550. ft E. Solid Waste / Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise for bids for the sale of a 1990 surplus crane - Effer Model 8600-23 Articulating Crane. F. Engineering / Work Authorization No. 3 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the work authorization with Hazen & Sawyer Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $4,770 for additional surveying services required for the evaluation of the Ft. Pierce Farms Water Control District Canal System and authorize the Chairman to sign the work authorization. .,r CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 27, 2001 PAGE TWO 4. COMMUNITY SERVICES FY 2000/01 U.S.C. 5307 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Grant - Consider staff recommendation to accept the grant award in the amount of $1,069,249, approve the subgrant agreement with the Council on Aging/Community Transit, and authorize the Chairman to sign all documents. 5. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET A. Budget Resolution No. 01-76 / Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Grant for the Fort Pierce Boat Launching Facility - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget resolution to appropriate and expend the funds from the grant in the amount of $251,986. Budget Resolution No. 01-85 / Briargate Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) Budget - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the budget resolution establishing the budget for the Briargate MSBU Project. C. Budget Resolution No. 01-84 / King's Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District Budget - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the budget resolution establishing the budget for the Kings Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District Project. 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Quit Claim Deeds / Dixieland S/D - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign the Quit -Claim Deeds and return deeds to petitioner for recording in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Resolution No. 01-82 / Street Naming / Loop Road - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution to name Loop Road, authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution, instruct staff to record the resolution in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, and inform the necessary Utilities and Public Agencies of the naming of Loop Road C. Revocable License Agreement / Robert C. Fender - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Revocable License Agreement, authorize the Chairman to execute the Revocable License Agreement and instruct Mr. Fender to record the Agreement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. V UTILITIES A. Agreement Extension - Consider staff recommendation to approve the extension of the agreement between the City of Punta Gorda and Sunstate Meter & Supply, Inc. for the purchase of water meters for various St. Lucie County Utility Districts. n u CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 27, 2001 PAGE THREE UTILITIES (CONTINUED) B. Memorandum of Understanding - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities and the funding in the amount of $10,000 consistent with all of the participants. 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 - Consider staff recommendation to approve utilization of the maintenance building at the St. Lucie County International Airport to activate FTZ 218. B. Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 Board of Directors - Consider staff recommendation to approve the nomination of Rudy Howard and the retention of Dewitt Beckett to the Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 Board of Directors. C. Resolution No. 01-014 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution urging the Acquisition and Restoration Council to continue funding for the North Fork St. Lucie River Project under the Florida Forever Program. 9. LIBRARY St. Lucie West Library / Contracted Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the expenditure of $85,424 for contracted services through Indian River Community College for the St. Lucie West Library, and authorize the County Administrator to sign the Purchasing requisition for payment of services. 10, INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE Bid No. 01-022 / Roof Replacements - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to Tom Tanenbaum, Inc. for Empire I and Empire II, and to The Roof Authority, Inc., for EOC, and Rock Road Al-A4, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney. 11. ADMINISTRATION Budget Amendment No. BA01-125 / Postage Machine Rental - Consider staff recommendation to approve the replacement of the postage machine in the Human Resources Mail Room, and approve the budget amendment for the rental of a postage machine from Pitney Bowes in the amount of $667 per month. 12. DECISION PACKAGES / PHASE II Personal Computer and Server Replenishment Program - Consider staff recommendation to approve the program and authorize staff to negotiate and bring back an agreement for Board consideration. ..✓ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 6 DATE: March 20, 2001 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ x] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi -JD. [ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SE ad D BY SUBMITTED BY (DEPT):Community Development Department P �7 e� Deptment Head SUBJECT: A Resolution that Project Number 01-00106 be approvedaras a Qualified Applicant pursuant to S.288.106 Florida Statutes for the Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund, and providing an appropriation of $100,000.00 through the Job Growth Investment Grant as local participation in the Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund Program for Fiscal years 2002 through 2011. In order to submit a grant application to the State of Florida for a Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund to be granted to Project Number 01-00106, it is necessary for St.Lucie County to pass a Resolution in support of the company's relocation and to show that the County has provided incentive dollars for the company to relocate to St. Lucie County in providing appropriation of $100,000.00 as local participation in the program. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On July 26, 2000 the St. Lucie County issued a Letter of Intent offering a Job Growth Investment Grant in the amount of $100,000.00 to Project Number 01-00106 for the creation of 50 new jobs to St. Lucie County. RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to S.288.106 Florida Statutes, Staff recommends that the Board pass Resolution 01-00106 recommending that Project Number 01- 00106 be approved as a Qualified Target Industry Business Tax Refund applicant. COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] APPROVED [ ] [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: CONCU DENIED / `2/� Douglas Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Mgt & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept Finance: (copies only): Other: Other: MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commission FROM: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director DATE: March 19, 2001 SUBJECT: Resolution to recommend that Project No. 01-00106 be approved for a Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund The Qualifed Target Industry (QTI) Tax Refund is a tool available to Florida communities to encourage quality job growth in targeted high value-added businesses. If approved, Project No. 01-00106 may receive refunds on taxes it pays. This includes corporate income, sales, ad valorem, intangible personal property, insurance premiums, and certain other taxes. There is a cap of $5 Million per single qualified applicant in all years, and no more than 25 percent of the total refund may be taken in any single fiscal year Project Number 01-00106 has applied for the Qualified Target Tax Refund. The submission of a grant application to the State of Florida for a Qualified Target Tax Refund, Florida statute, S.288.106), requires that a Resolution be adopted by the local governing body, St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners recommending the applicant, Project No. 01-00106 be approved as a QTI Business and indicating the level of local financial support that has been committed. On July 26, 2000 St. Lucie County forwarded a Letter of Intent offering the company a Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement in the amount of $100,000.00 as an incentive for the company to locate to St. Lucie County and create 50 new high wage, high skill jobs. Our level of local support has been evidenced to the State by the Letter of Intent offering the Job Growth Investment Grant. ,%W ..r QUALIFIED TARGET INDUSTRY TAX REFUND PROGRAM RESOLUTION 01-013 A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA RECOMMENDING THAT ENTERPRISE FLORIDA PROJECT NUMBER 01-00106 BE APPROVED AS A QUALIFIED APPLICANT PURSUANT TO SECTION 288.106, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING AN APPROPRIATION OF $100,000.00 AS LOCAL PARTICIPATION IN THE QUALIFIED TARGET INDUSTRY TAX REFUND PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR(S) 2002 through 2011; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND TRANSMITTAL. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA as follows: WHEREAS, the business under consideration is an amphibious aircraft manufacturer; and WHEREAS, Project No. 01-00106 has determined to locate an operation center in St. Lucie County at the St. Lucie County International Airport. WHEREAS, Project No. 01-00106, aircraft manufacturer has determined to relocate its operations from Illinois, to St. Lucie County and create 50 jobs and make a capital investment of $3.0 million in St. Lucie County. WHEREAS, the aircraft manufacturer's relocation will play an important part in the development of the St. Lucie County International Airport in Fort Pierce, Florida and will assist in alleviating the high unemployment rate in the County; and WHEREAS, the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners has issued a letter of intent committing to granting Project No. 01-00106, a Job Growth Investment Grant of up to $100,000.00 based on $2000.00 per job for fifty new jobs created NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA that: (1) the Board hereby recommends that Project No. 01-00106, be approved as a Qualified Target Industry Business pursuant to SECTION 288.106, Florida Statutes; and (2) The necessary commitment of local financial support for the Qualified Target industry Business for the Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund Program exists in the form of the Job Created on 3/9/2001 10:36 AM ,%W ..r Growth Incentive Grant funds in the amount of $100,000.00; (3) that $70,000 will be available in the following increments, $17,500.00 per year for fiscal years 2002 through 2005 and will be paid directly to Project No. 01-00106 upon proof of meeting the grant requirements by evidence of job creation; and $30,000 represents the "local participation" required by SECTION 288.106, Florida Statutes and will be paid to the State of Florida Economic Development Trust Fund to be used as the 20% local match required. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The County Administration is directed to forward a copy of this resolution to Enterprise Florida, Inc., and Project No. 01-00106. DULY ADOPTED BY THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA this day of , 2001. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows Chairman Frannie Hutchinson xxx Vice -Chairman Doug Coward xxx Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This —day of 2001. ATTEST: Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA M Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney Created on 3/9/2001 10:36 AM ,%W .✓ ITEM NO. AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney SUBJECT: Indrio North Savannas update Florida Communities Trust project BACKGROUND: Please see attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAIL. 1A PREVIOUS ACTION: DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] PRESENTED BY: Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manager CONCLUSION: No action required, informational status update. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Review and Approvals XX County Attorney: Management & Budget XX Originating Dept. � C_ Utilities Dept. Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) G:\ACQ\WP\DON\Indrio Say. agenda.wpd 7-1, Douglas Anderson County Administrator Purchasing: Leisure Se E f f 6 / 9 6 %%W Nwo' PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Donald G. Cole, Property Acquisition Manager DATE: March 27, 2001 SUBJECT: Indrio North Savannas update Florida Communities Trust project For the past three years, St. Lucie County has been acquiring land in the Indrio North Savannas project. This project was ranked as an "A" site and recommended for purchase by the St. Lucie County Land Acquisition Selection Committee. Through a grant application with Florida Communities Trust (FCT), FCT agreed to pay the lessor of $1,175,000 or 50% of the cost of this project. Because there were so many different owners, expectations for a successful project were not very high in the beginning. Due to the expertise and guidance of the FCT staff this project has steadily progressed. The involvement of FCT in this proj ect is now over and the grant portion of this project is closed. This project was made up of 228 parcels of land. The majority of the parcels (225) were individual one acre parcels. Overall, County staff has acquired 210 of the 228 parcels which is approximately 272 acres of the total 296 acres of land within this project. This new acreage surrounds about 65 acres of County owned property. Most of the individual one acre parcels were purchased at approximately 80% of the appraised value. After negotiations, a large parcel, 3.5 +/- acres (parcel #3) was donated to the County by Harbor Branch. The 39 +/-acre lake at the old Stewart Sand Mine was acquired by donation as a result of a requirement of a mining permit. The remaining upland portion (12.5 +/- acres) of the sand mine was purchased below appraised value. This purchase included a building and also a billboard that now provides additional income for maintenance of the site. At this time, the County owns about 92% of the land within the designated project boundaries. This joint FCT/St. Lucie County project has been a success for all concerned. `. *190, The remaining 18 parcels make up 8% of the land that the County was not able to acquire. Although these 18 parcels are not a large number, they will affect the finalization of the project. Of these18 parcels, 10 parcels are owned by a company and one of the partners has refused to sell these parcels at the appraised value. Six of these 10 parcels (181, 182, 209- 212) make up a small pond area and 2 are small slivers of land (64 &193). There are willing sellers with title problems on parcels 57, 59 and 69. The County Attorney will discuss some possible alternatives. The total cost, including due diligence for all the land in the project was $2,148,186.60. Ofthis total cost, the County paid $1,074,696.81 out of the Environmentally Sensitive Land Fund and Florida Communities Trust paid $1,074,696.81 with Preservation 2000 funds. Title to this land is vested in St. Lucie County's name. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of a letter dated March 19 from FCT Executive Director, Janice Browning expressing FCT's pleasure in the success of this project. As Ms. Browning's letter indicates, these sensitive lands were purchased at a reasonable price and are now preserved for the residents of St. Lucie County forever. CONCLUSION: No action required, informational status update. Respectfully submitted, c...--rtiC Jit`t� Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manager G:NCQ\WP\D0N1Wm Say....o pd MAR,-20-2001 07:54 FL COMMUNITIES TRUST eTO 921 1747 F.0_' March 19, 2001 Fll®R°]1�118i' C®1CIl11t1[ilIlIlnifies rJ"I u$¢ Mr. Daniel McIntyre County Attorney 3rd Floor, Administrative Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 RE: Indrio North Savannahs195-052-P56\St. Lucie County Dear Mr. McIntyre: On February 8, 1996, funding was granted by the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) governing board to St. Lucie County in the amount of $1,175,000.00 for the purchase of properties located in the Indrio North Savannahs. The project consisted of a subdivision and surrounding land containing 228 parcels. FCT contributed $1,074,696.8I toward the purchase of the properties with the County matching that amount with its own funds. The County assumed the responsibility of purchasing the site and completed the purchase of 92% of the parcels in the total project site. This percentage of success in purchasing land containing subdivision lots is well above the standard for this type of acquisition, When compared to other state and local acquisition records, acquisitions of subdivisions usually range in the area of a 25-50% success rate. Your staff, consisting of Yvonne McCall and Don Cole have accomplished a phenomenal feat in the acquisition of this project. They have successfully purchased this site for St. Lucie County residents to enjoy passive recreational opportunities for all time. The FCT thanks you and your staff for making this a successful Preservation 2000 project. Sincerely, I ice Browning ecutive Director DEPAKTMENT Of COMMUNrry AEPAas • 2555 SMUMAKD OAK BOULEVARD - T.1L'i1HAL5EE, FL 32399.210E 850l922-2207 • SUNCOm 292.2207 - FAX 8501921.1747 TI_:Ti,A, F . f: Morth Savannas Indrio tz z 5"r Ca. �117 005 'Y 7 ZaReWMd Hale Point PW* :elue Viking 71 Parks Cove is arbor Brancii,68 anagrapFneCY.nshtution- pping,cenxer j y 0 Il %LljN IN I A ? Falrmnds Lucie County Ind d)St tt Air�ej�T 8agge it, ..i ndrio North Savannas FCT #95-052-P56 o I 1 Project Boundary ■ Parcels acquired ■ Parcels not acquired i Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map prepared March 16. 2MI N MTMI� mW tit OIT MVm bTe� WµV � �O W�Mp �N. tlwry NM E� nb tl POAM tl� my u�Ytl �xAe Yb.ri4m p�[4. �• MYYYC bra � 0 � tN9 buunnt `.. AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED 6Y(DEPT): Administration SUBJECT: Bi-Weekly Committee Reports ..i ITEM NO. $ DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR[ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[ ] PRESENTED BY: Doug Anderson County Administrator BACKGROUND: At the April 11, 2000 Board of County Commissioners Meeting it was decided by the Board to place an item on the agenda, on a bi-weekly basis, to give the Board an opportunity to provide updates on the various Committees and Advisory Boards that they serve on. it has been decided by the County Administrator that this item will be placed on the agenda on the 2"' and 4' Tuesday of each month. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: This meeting the Board will provide updates on the following Committees and Advisory Boards that they serve on: Committee Meeting Date Commissioner Blueway Advisory Committee Monthly Barnes Chamber of Commerce Board of Dir. Monthly Hutchinson Children's Services Council 2"' Thursday Barnes Cultural Affairs Council 2"' Tuesday Hutchinson 51-C Expressway Authority 3' Thursday Lewis/Bruhn Friends of 51-C Library 2"' Thursday Lewis Property & Homeowners 2"' Wednesday Lewis St. Lucie County Fire District 3'' Wednesday Bruhn/Coward Transportation DLCB 2"' Wedjieeday Lewis Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 3'' Friday Coward/Barnes Lake Okeechobee Coalition Monthly Barnes/Bruhn COMMISSION ACTION: [ �] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Douglas Anderson County Administrator 0 CONSENT ITEMS N%W No 03/23/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA PAGE F7.ABWARR WARRANT LIST #25- 17-MAR-2001 TO 23-MAR-2001 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 001 General Fund 855,117.11 23,044.15 001128 Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning FY01 6,303.30 0.00 001130 TC Community Action Agency FY00/01 3,186.00 0.00 001252 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant 26.81 0.00 001807 Floridian Aquifer Well Monitoring 1.42 0.00 001809 SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 1.42 0.00 101 Transportation Trust Fund 64,017.68 0.00 101002 Transportation Trust/80% Constitut 215.83 0.00 101003 Transportation Trust/Local Option 17,208.60 0.00 101006 Transportation Trust/Impact Fees 100.00 0.00 101103 SJRWMD Savannas State Reserve Ecosy 55,000.00 0.00 101211 FDEP Canal & Stormwater Retrofit 139,046.40 0.00 101802 SFWM-101-N Savannas State Rec Ecosy 60,000.00 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 1,861.34 0.00 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 99,201.55 0.00 105 Library Special Grants Fund 1,845.45 0.00 107 Fine & Forfeiture Fund 239,633.46 0.00 107002 Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar 4.26 0.00 113 Harmony Heights 3 Fund 204.21 0.00 114 Harmony Heights 4 Fund 448.92 0.00 116 Sunland Gardens Fund 498.47 0.00 Sunrise Park Fund 124.38 0.00 Holiday Pines Fund 730.44 0.00 121 Blakely Subdivision Fund 69.00 0.00 123 Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund 254.75 0.00 136 Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund 1,309.47 0.00 138 Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund 106.78 0.00 140 Port & Airport Fund 2,903.81 0.00 140001 Port Fund 100.77 0.00 145813 IRL SWIM Impound Rest IX 97.32 0.00 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 1,553.37 0.00 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 108.49 0.00 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 104.99 0.00 183002 Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat 425.00 0.00 183004 Ct'Admin.- Teen Court 238.38 0.00 183212 OSCA-Court Reporting Grant 00/01 3,361.50 0.00 186 Recycling Operating Fund 236.71 0.00 204 Communication System I&S Fund 768,368.75 0.00 215 5-Yr Bldg Bond Anticipat.I&S Fund 957,990.00 0.00 282 Environmental Land I&S Fund 271,005.00 0.00 304 Communication System Fund 2,566.49 0.00 316 County Capital 32,776.80 0.00 330 Lakewood Park Fund 1,240.00 0.00 352 SHI Wastewater Treatment Proj Fund 1,617.00 0.00 382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 649.69 0.00 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 96,098.78 0.00 418 Golf Course Fund 25,353.64 0.00 H.E.W. Utilities Fund 1,615.09 0.00 1 r.. .WOO, 03/23/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA F7ABWARR WARRANT LIST #25- 17-MAR-2001 TO 23-MAR-2001 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 202,481.27 448 Renewal & Replacement Fund 2,831.03 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 168,264.01 461 Sports Complex Fund 10,558.08 471 Holiday Pines Utilities Fund 168,146.90 491 Building Code Fund 190.16 501 Information Technology Fund 4,907.35 505 Health Insurance Fund 5,742.78 510 Service Garage Fund 45,676.10 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 701.26 625 Law Library 12,130.00 676 King Orange MSBU Fund 4,875.00 GRAND TOTAL: 4,341,432.57 PAGE 2 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,378.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,422.70 1 1 `w *M + 03/23/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA F7ABWARR i VOID LIST# 25- 17-MAR-2001 TO 23-MAR-2001 P-,Z : 001 - General Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00267449 I2108207 Barnes, Clifford H 115.71 I2108210 115.71 I2108211 115.71 I2108212 115.71 CHECK TOTAL: 462.84 00269554 I2112928 Ft Pierce Utility Authority In 26.43 I2112945 6,186.60 I2112947 1,439.32 I2113229 105.86 I2113374 105.67 I2113378 267.93 I2113379 121.79 I2113380 370.06 I2113381 101.25 I2113382 111.65 I2113383 95.96 I2113385 796.55 I2113404 11.79 CHECK TOTAL: 9,740.86 FUND TOTAL: 10,203.70 PAGE 1 i *10 03/23/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA PAGE 2 F7ABWARR VOID LIST# 25- 17-MAR-2001 TO 23-MAR-2001 1iJD: 101 - Transportation Trust Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00269554 I2113322 Ft Pierce Utility Authority In 885.28 FUND TOTAL: 885.28 03/23/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA F7ABWARR VOID LIST# 25- 17-MAR-2001 TO 23-MAR-2001 PuLiD: 107 - Fine & Forfeiture Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00269554 I2113176 Ft Pierce Utility Authority In 80.80 I2113202 I2113204 258 258 .0 4 I2113207 1164 I2113213 35..2 I2113218 I2113221 17606 , 9760 I2113224 9321 I2113228 24....870 I2113231 613 I2113233 ..9 318.29 CHECK TOTAL: 4,058.44 FUND TOTAL: 4,058.44 PAGE 3 03/23/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA PAGE 4 FZABWARR VOID LIST# 25- 17-MAR-2001 TO 23-MAR-2001 Hu,Z : 121 - Blakely Subdivision Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00269554 I2113214 Ft Pierce Utility Authority In 69.00 FUND TOTAL: 69.00 1 03/23/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA PAGE 5 FZABWARR VOID LIST# 25- 17-MAR-2001 TO 23-MAR-2001 b-AD: 316 - County Capital CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00269554 I2113192 Ft Pierce Utility Authority In 2,780.00 FUND TOTAL: 2,780.00 %W1 AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Leisure Services ../ ITEM NO. C2a DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Director, Leisure Services SUBJECT: Approval to apply for floating dock permit for River Park Marina and enhance the docking facilities. BACKGROUND: Green Seas who is contracted with the County to provide river boat tours from the River Park Marina would like to apply for a permit to install 2 floating docks and enhance the docking facilities. After review of the permit, the County attorney's office recommends that the County apply for the permit directly instead of authorizing Green Seas to act on the County's behalf as agent. In the Agreement between the County and Green Seas, underArticle 9, Section 9.03 Ownership of Improvements/Equipment it specifies that all fixtures, furnishings, equipment or improvements provided by Lessee shall at the termination of the Lease become the property of the County. The docks and improvements will represent an approximate $17,000 donation to the County from Green Seas. Staff has spoken to employees of DEP on both the local and state levels and Green Seas has had two on -site meetings with DEP and they are prepared to process our request immediately. The application fee is one hundred dollars. FUNDS AVAILABLE IN: 001-7215563011-700 Improvements Other Than Bldgs. Permits/Applic. PREVIOUS ACTION : N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners give approval for staff to apply for a floating dock permit for River Park Marina and allow enhancement to docking facilities. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [,I APPROVED [ ] DENIED '7, [ ] OTHER: Doug Anderson County Administrator f Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: Mgt. & Budget(Z � Purchasing Mgr.: Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eff. 1197 H:\WP\Green Seas permit agenda.wpd JOINT APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT/ AUTHORIZATION TO USE SOVEREIGN SUBMERGED LANDS/ FEDERAL DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/ WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS/ U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS EXEMPT PROJECTS If your project may qualify as exempt from permitting, please include the following for review- ( All drawings should be submitted on 8 112 x 11 paper) 1. Location Map- include lot number where possible 2. Plans/Drawings- On a plan -section view, and a cross-section view, show the following (show all dimensions): ✓Existing Structures Proposed Structures Structure Setbacks from Property Lines and Riparian Rights Lines Shoreline length and width of waterbody Mean High and Mean Low tidal water lines 3. Complete Parts 1 through 8 of the Joint Application, or those areas highlighted specific to your project. 4. (OPTIONAL) Photograph(s) of project area. To expedite the processing and review of your project, include current photos of the shoreline to include any vegetative species For Projects in Martin, Okeechobee and St. Lucie Counties, Submit completed Form to: Department of Environmental Protection 1801 SE Hillmoor Dr. Suite C-204 Port St. Lucie, FL 34952 INTRODUCTION FOR JOINT APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT/AUTHORIZATION TO USE STATE OWNED SUBMERGED LANDS/ FEDERAL DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT INTRODUCTION Attached is a joint application for: 1) activities regulated under Part IV of Chapter 373, F.S.; 2) activities which require authorization to use state owned submerged lands; and 3) activities which require federal dredge and fill permit. Certain activities may qualify for an exemption. If an activity qualifies for an exemption, an application is not required, although the use of this application form is the most expeditious way for the agencies to make the determination that the activity qualifies for an exemption. Attachment 2 list various regulated activities and the type of permit required for each activity. If you have any questions, please contact the staff of the nearest office of either the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) or a Water Management District (WMD). PROCESSING AGENCY/DISTRICT SERVICE CENTERS The Department of Environmental Protection ("Department' or "DEP") regulates some types of activities, and the Water Management Districts ("WMDs") regulate others. Attachment 1, DEP/WMD Permitting Responsibilities, specifies which activities are regulated by each agency. Environmental Resource Permit Applications shall be made tot he appropriate District/Department office serving the area in which the activity is proposed. Attachment 4 designates the appropriate agency office for each geographic area. COPIES/APPLICATION FEES Submit an original signed application form plus two copies of the form, and three complete sets of all the requested drawings and other information to the appropriate DEP or WMD office. Submit the appropriate fee with your application. Application fees are listed in Attachment 3. DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS When activities are proposed in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters, a portion of the application (Section A and Section C, with the associated drawings) will be forwarded to the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) by the reviewing agency. The ACOE will advise you of any additional information that may be required to complete your federal dredge and fill permit application. It is not necessary for the applicant to submit a separate application to the ACOE. The information requested in this application form may be more than required to make a complete application to the ACOE. However, it is useful and may be essential for subsequent evaluation. Reducing unnecessary paperwork and delays is a continuing goal of the ACOE. DISTRIBUTION TO THE DEP FOR STATE LAND APPROVAL If the application checks the box to request authorization to use sovereign submerged lands, the Department will begin processing the request for sovereign submerged lands approval. Additionally, if at any time during the processing of the application, it appears that the proposed activities may take place on sovereign submerged lands, the Department will initiate a review for the authorization to use such lands. For an explanation of sovereign submerged lands approval see Attachment 5. NOTE: The information listed in Sections B. D, E, and F of this application package is not intended to be all- inclusive. Additional information may be requested by the reviewing agency in order to complete your application. SECTION A FOR AGENCY USHQNLB ALOE Application'# DEFIW[? ApPt�tetiap # DateAppticadon tieceivod Data ApPiicaGgm Received Proposed Frojecf Lot Fee Received Proposed Prgectlang, Fee Recapt # PART 1: Are any of the activities described in this application proposed to occur in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters? e no Is this application being filed by or on behalf of a government entity or drainage district? yes no PART 2: --- A. Type of Environmental Resource Permit Requested (check at least one). See Attachment 2 for thresholds and descriptions. ✓Noticed General - include information requested in Section B. Standard General (Single Family Dwelling)- include information requested in Sections C and D. Standard General (all other Standard General projects)- include information requested in Sections C and E. Individual (Single Family Dwelling) - include information requested in Sections C and D. Individual (all other Individual projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E. Conceptual - include information requested in Sections C and E. Mitigation Bank Permit (construction) - include information requested in Sections C and F. (If the proposed mitigation bank involves the construction of a surface water management system requiring another permit defined above, check the appropriate box and submit the information requested by the applicable section.) Mitigation Bank (conceptual) - include information requested in Sections C and F. B. Type of activity for which you are applying (check at least one) Construction or operation of a new system, other than a solid waste facility, including dredging or filling in, on or over wetlands and other surface waters. Construction, expansion or modification of a solid waste facility. Alteration or operation of an existing system which was not previously permitted by a WMD or DEP. ✓ Modification of a system previously permitted by a WMD or DEP. Provide previous permit numbers: Alteration of a system Extension of permit duration Abandonment of a system Construction of additional phases of a system Removal of a system C. Are you requesting authorization to use Sovereign Submerged Lands, y no (See Section G and Attachment 5 for more information before answering this question.) D. For activities in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters, check type of federal dredge and fill permit requested: Individual Programmatic General General Nationwide Not Applicable E. Are you claiming to qualify for an exemption? yes no If yes, provide rule number if known. PART 3: A. OWNER(S) OF LAND B. ENTITY TO RECEIVE PERMIT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) Name Name St. Lucie County Title and Company Title and Company Board of County Commissioners Address Address 2300 Virginia Avenue City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Ft. PiPtce, Florida 34982 Telephone and Fax Telephone and Fax (561)462-1511 Fax(561)462-1940 C. AGENT AUTHORIZED TO SECURE PERMIT D. CONSULTANT (IF DIFFERENT FROM AGENT) Name Name Title and Company Title and Company Address Address City, State, Zip City, Slate, Zip Telephone and Fax Telephone and Fax PART 4: (Please provide metric equivalent for federally funded projects): A. Name of Project, including phase if applicable: River Park Marina —Floating Docks B. Is th�is� �an for part of a multi -phase project? �plication yes C. Total applicant -owned area contiguous to the project? 18.17 ac.; ha. D. Total area served by the system: N/A ac.; Its. E. Impervious area for which a permit is sought: N/A ac.; ha. F. Volume of water that the system is capable of impounding: N/A ac. ft.; m G. What is the total area of work in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters? ac.; ha.; 400 sq. ft.; sq. m. H. Total volume of material to be dredged: N/A cubic A cubic in I. Number of new boat slips proposed: 2 wet slips; _ dry slips PART 5: Project location (use additional sheets if needed): County(ies) St. Lucie Section(s) 22 Township 365 Range 40 E Section(s) Township Range Section(s) Township Range Land Grant name, if applicable: N/A Tax Parcel Identification Number: 3422-331-0000-000/2 Street Address, Road or other location: 500 Prima Vista Blvd. City, Zip Code, if applicable: Port St. Lucie 34952 PART 6: Describe in general terms the proposed project, system, or activity. Example 1: As shown on the attached plan view and cross sectional drawings, construct a square foot dock with a _ ft. by_ ft access and a_ ft. by_ ft. mooring platform. Construct an associated_ tt, by_ ft. mooring area with _ associated pilings and a boaglft. Example 2: As shown on the attached plan view and cross sectional drawings, construct a linear foot seawall at the mean high water line, faced with % fL to 3 ft. (avg. diameter) rip rap installed at a 2:1 Horizontal:Vertical slope. 1. As shown on the attached site plan, enhance Docking facilities with the addition of 2 floating docks that are 10'X 20' each a location specified on drawing. 2. Place temporary mouring for excursion vessels during non operational hours. PART 7: A. If there have been any pre -application meetings, including on -site meetings, with regulatory staff, please list the dats(s), location(s), and names of key staff and project representatives. Two meetings with DEP: 1) Jan 8 2001 /9.00 am at DEP Office located at 1801 S.E. Hillmoor Dr, Suite C-204 Port St. Lucie F1. 2)Dec. 15, 2000 at DEP Office, Port St. Lucie. Met with Daryl DeLeeuw (DEP)_3) Several impromptu meetings with Jeff Beale (DEP),on site of proposed docks, improvements. B. Please identify by number any MSSW/Wetland Resource/ERP/ACOE Permits pending, issued or denied for projects at the location, and any related enforcement actions. Agency Date Noffype of Action Taken ApN/Ation N/A N/A B. Note: The following information is required for projects proposed to occur in, on or over wetla that need a federal dredge and fill permit or an authorization to use state owned submerged lands. Please provide the names, addresses and zip codes of property owners whose property directly adjoins the project (excluding application) and/or (for proprietary authorizations) is located within a 500 ft. radius of the applicant's land. Please attach a plan view showing the owner's names and adjoining property lines. Attach additional sheets if necessary. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. PART 8: A. By signing this application form, I am applying, or I am applying on behalf of the applicant, for the permit and any Proprietary authorizations identified above, according to the supporting data and other incidental information Tiled with this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application and represent that such information is true, complete and accurate. I understand this is an application and not a permit, and that work prior to approval is a violation. 1 understand that this application and any permit issued or proprietary authorization issued pursuant thereto, does not relive me of any obligation for obtaining any other required federal, state, water management district or local permit prior to commencement of construction. I agree, or I agree on behalf of the applicant to operate and maintain the permitted system unless the permitting agency authorizes transfer of the permit to a responsible operation entity. I understand that knowingly making any false statement or representation in this application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. St. Lucie County, Board of County Commissioners fped/Printed Name of Applicant (if no Agent is used) or Agent (If one is so Signature of Applicant/Agent Date (Corporate Title if applicable) AN AGENT MAY SIGN ABOVE ONLY IF THE APPLICANT COMPLETES THE FOLLOWING: B. I hereby designate and authorize the agent listed above to act on my behalf, or on behalf of my corporation, as the agent in the processing of this application for the permit and/or proprietary authorization indicated above; and to furnish, on request, supplemental information in support of the application. In addition, I authorize the above -listed agent to bind me, or my corporation, to perform any requirements which may be necessary to procure the permit or authorization indicated above. I understand that knowingly making any false statement or representation in this application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. Typed/Printed Name of Applicant i Signature of Applicant I Date (Corporate Title if applicable) Please note: The applicant's original signature (not a copy) Is required above PERSON AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: C. I either own the property described in this application or I have legal authority to allow access to the property, and I consent, after receiving prior notification, to any site visit on the property by agents or personnel from the Department of Environmental Protection, the Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers necessary for the review and inspection of the proposed project specified in this application. I authorize these agents or personnel to enter the property as many times as may be necessary to make such review and inspection. Further, I agree to provide entry to the project site for such agents or personnel to monitor permitted work if a permit is granted. Typed/Printed Name of Applicant i Signature of Applicant i Date (Corporate Title if applicable) In N.1 .p.,Wt1 at 1, Lmt U .11 11/3/Iri8 A.H"* 11/311m en , !... pee I.... ..... u.r n... Y r� sc ?c III `n s 10 fc . c.je� 5.a v .L' 1Q1'y LATITUDE: 27' 15' 221' LOCATION MAP LOOITUDE: 80' 15' 20" N.T.S. OESG. OR SCALE N.T.S. ORAw coo NORTH PORT MARINA IS. Boa w "KD PORT ST. LUCIE YACHT CLUB SHEET 1 APR GEE & JENSON OAR l PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA DATE APRV REVISION 1 OF 4 mra,Rs� :Q/ 'AC .q,ors 4� a,"t t # it9n 4,#M3.�T �00 3i e " w� � t .ri � �� .'ice-• r # L+' Y " • p� " 1. i. t%��" 9.'�y� IC SWAMPt'+'� �*� vi'A* ,41, � s •i jw- .Y R^ dS'[ �.♦ .. yyy,,, a t �rx 'f*�aT �" E r'."'s'yy°`. Of ° ST. LUCIE C0 Y ,y ST. ;`� 31-0000- 21, LUCIE Co.a. Z±. A. �ACAN C.wS3 -70` Y l' 51 C. ADM%46%a l &or%k 12' j �Z.' [,• 17ncIC X 32' �• 5"Toeok&C=16f�q 2,p'Y201 jb• . L—l�pck 4' K 32I3o F. L+b LK W� 3%f ". Y_4,1 Pi I " . s�f_ s r _ Miiv n A. �iacNz Cws3 �o',rl5' C. ADM%Yoio.i l�ooTq ►a' �z' E, Dc��1C yK 32' �• SToQAd@IBf3f� 2.o'X2.o�. L-llc 4'x 3213o �4AL WAMP lw ai xs44i I� t t3 t' v n p "t It f. r L SW�F't•� F +1 e� `.. �. �„?'' r �, y'.�',e�"°s �'rL�". 1 41. 4,4 �r�y('ty^`Y 4• ems'' f/� A"-. ,. J'. 00 t �yTwj�.q..+}�, Y��`,�)�/7,•�i". t )i-i•'-" t y'!Y` ••e l f r.. y�,�.r� 4^" ,rM �$,�+�'� i r'�:r f \ �� .� ! !} VIA/ i - y,• _ ,k��w s P ST. r LUQE CO. �P -1.76 Ac ±A„ A. iacN� Cwc3 �o'Y IS' C. ADrn��,o� t�oT� �z',��z' C, Doc1C 4X 32.' 3• STo2Nbf_IgfSt� 7_o'tc�/ !�. L- 1� WY 3i(3o F. L1"x 3o' %W m 09 �. w IW-W. *ftwl AGENDA REQUEST `"0' ITEM NO. C2b DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Director, Leisure Services SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Leisure Services SUBJECT: Approve purchase of a football field marking machine for the South County Regional Stadium and Equipment Request # EQ01-241 BACKGROUND: In anticipation of the South County Regional Stadium's completion forthe fall football season, staff has determined the need for a football marking machine for preparation of the field. Park's currently has one football marking machine in inventory but one machine will not be adequate to meet the needs of both Lawnwood Stadium and South County Regional Stadium during football season. Staff has obtained a quote from JDL Equipment, which is the only company that provides this particular machine, in the amount of $1,027. Funds are available due to purchase savings from other budgeted capital equipment. FUNDS AVAILABLE IN: 001-7210-564000-700 (Parks Capital Equipment PREVIOUS ACTION: NIA RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the BOCC approve purchase of the football field marking machine for use at the South County Regional Stadium and Equipment Request # EQ01- 241 COMMISSION ACTION: [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Originating Dept: l Coordination Si atures Mgt. & Budge Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eff. 1197 CONCURRENCE: Doug Anderson County Administrator Purchasing Other: H:\WP\SCRS marking machine.wpd IitPARTMENT Leisure Services/Parks NW FUND 001.7210.W8 00.700 DATA INPUT CLERK PAGE DELIVER TO: REMARKS Comm Code: REQUISITION# VENDORS REQUISITION DATE SOLESOURCE 91 NUMBER 27066 NAME JDL EQUIPMENT #2 NUMBER NAME ADDRESS EMERGENCY PURCHASE #3 NUMBER NAME ADDRESS ITEM NO. QUANTITY UM DESCRIPTION VENDOR #3 UNIT PRICE VENDOR #2 UNIT PRICE VENDOR #1 UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE Football Field Marking Machine - $1027.00 (1) Topline Marker #TXE505 @$950.00, (1) Spray Wand #TXEWAND @$47.00 plus shipping charges of $30.00. PRICES ESTABLISHED BY: VENDOR TOTALS $1027.00 VENDOR REPRESENTATIVE zt REQUESTMG PERSON DEPARTM OR AUTHORIZE R ON ONLY I s n M '-4� 150 Domorah Drive Montgomeryville, PA M36 Phone: (215) 6284895 fox (215) 628-6651 Ta Thomas O'Connor, T.O. From John Doyts Co: St. Lucie County, Leisure Servicos Phone: $61.7854=1 Date:1130/01 Few 561443.1940 Follow 1 Rot TopIIM quote CC. ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Plems Reply O Planes Recycle am NO, 9ESCRIFTIO11 UNIT PRICE 1 TXE605 Topline Marker-4 hr "50.00 1 TXR2000 Front Marking Discs N!C 1 TXEWAND Spray Wand $47.00 1 TXE250 Topline Markaa-A hr $750.00 1 TXE2000 Front Marking Discs N1C 1 TXEWANO Spray Wand $47.00 Shipping charge would be $30.00 for either unit. Thank you for the opportunity to quote. fiw" afbw� 'fir z C 3 W m z C N CD CD a y O cy a 0 J z mm 5 m m 3 m z m CD m z O D Z v m 0 m D N Ac C C 0 3m n m0 �c Az m� A W tmn D 4 X -n 0 00 �m TI 0 v� 0 0 C r z m 0 X K N 3 o CA o N IV 0 CD z m X %W `✓ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2C DATE: 3-27-01 REGULAR [l PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [xx] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh, Director SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Leisure Services SUBJECT: Budget Amendment 01-134/Equipment Request 01-244 BACKGROUND: The Environmental Learning Center has hired an Education Specialist into a newly created position which the Board approved in November 2000. Since this is a new facility and this position was not originally included in this year's budget, no provision for a computer was made at that time. Board approval is needed in order to purchase this computer through Information Technology. The cost is $1598. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are now budgeted in 001-7912-552000-700 (Environmental ' Learning Center, Operating Supplies) and will be transferred via the Budget Amendment to 001-7912-564000-700 (Machinery and Equipment). PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Budget Amendment 01-134 and Equipment Request 01-244. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [X ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals 6 Purchasing:. County Attorney: Management 4 Budge / originating Dept. -I Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)_ \ 6 / ] � § \§ /( \ $6 )\ B§ B \\ ■CV L Ste_ o za w /\_§ °L° 2� it w u � z \\ 0 0 0 ono »& !» \� 0=z 2ƒ fS§ )� z�� k£ \2 § §\ u9: j oa �u y $LU ; )/ ' 3® w§ / \) U) \ 04 , \\ {\ \� \ CL S 4 () ) z B ) F ul a ) # § § ° ! $ ! % S V k ! § S 2 @ ]uj BOCC St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 SEND TO: Leisure Services Enviromental Learning Center 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft Pierce. FL 34982 P.O. NO. TERMSSHIP DATE BudgetOl-02 NET 30 DAYS 4/14/2001 QUOTE DATE 311512001 QUOTE NO 979 REQUESTED BY WORK ORDER NO. 6649 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QTY TOTAL Workstation Workstation PC 1,598.00 1 1.598.00 Pent III 933mhx Motherboard 128mb SDRAM Mid Case 19" Monitor PS 2 Keyboard Logitech Wheel PS 2 Mouse and Pad Windows 2000 Professional Floppy Drive 48x CDROM 20gb Hard Drive 16mb AGP Video Card 56k Internal Modem Soundcard and Speakers 10/100 NIC Card Budget FYol-Oz-- - — ----- ----- -- ------ TOTAL Quotes are valid for 30 days. Prices subject to change without notice. $1.598.00 *KDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FOh4 REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMB for Leisure Services PREPARED DATE: 03/22/01 AGENDA DATE: 03/27/01 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNTNAME AMOUNT TO: 001-7912-564000-700 Machinery & Equipment $1,598 Computers for Environmental Learning Center FROM: 001-7912-552000-700 Operating Supplies $1,598 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Purchase computer system for the Education Specialist. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: NIA N/A N/A DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: 01.134 G:\BUDGEnQuattro\GENERAL\FORMS\AMENDMOl.wb3 AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works Dept./Solid Waste Division ITEM NO. C3A DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: CONSENT: (XX) PRESEN (: Leo J. Cordeiro Solid Waste Manager SUBJECT: Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Solid Waste Division to publish, in a newspaperof general circulation, as required, the Solid Waste Full CostAccounting Report for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Rule 62-708, Florida Administrative Code (FAC), we are required to notify all users of the full cost incurred by St. Lucie County for providing Solid Waste Management Services. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Account 401-3410-549000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Solid Waste Division to publish, in a newspaper of general circulation, as required, the Solid Waste Full Cost Accounting Report for Fiscal Year1999-2000. COMMISSION ACTION: 0 APPROVED O DENIED O OTHER: ❑ County Attorney: CON NCE: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals Management and Budget �❑ Purchasing: originating Dept: Pub. Wks. , �Ibther: (Landfill) ElOther: ❑ Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 561-462-1777 or TTD 561-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting. y on 1�w Notice of Public Disclosure of the Full Cost of Solid Waste Management within the County of St. Lucie, Florida for the Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Pursuant to 62-708 Florida Administrative Code RESIDENTIAL: Cost per Unit Collection (1) N/A Disposal (2) $ 40.57 Recycling (3) $ 1.44 NON-RESIDENTIAL: Cost per Unit Collection (4) N/A Disposal (5) $ 22.27 Recycling (6) N/A * Residential Unit = Per Household * * Non -Residential Unit = Per Ton (1) The County Landfill tipping fees have no effect on the collection cost charged to residential customers. (2) This figure includes the Unincorporated Urban Service Area (UUSA) and the City of Pt. St. Lucie. (3) For the UUSA, City of Ft. Pierce and City of Pt. St. Lucie. (4) Service not provided by County. (5) An average cost per ton for UUSA and Pt. St. Lucie; Ft. Pierce hauls to Okeechobee County. (6) Service not provided by County. AGENDA REQUEST ..r 77 ITEM NO. C - J DATE: March 27, 2001 CONSENT [X] REGULAR [ l PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi -JD. [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: d 9 SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works Raymond Wazny Director SUBJECT: Authorize the Board of County Commissioners to approvIDi submitta of a grant application to Florida Inland Navigatiorict and approve the Resolution for Assistance Under the Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County's South Causeway Island has experienced severe cases of erosion along the northwest corner of the site. The largest amount of erosion occurs during elevated water levels and high-energy waves associated with storms. Through cost shares with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and FIND, the County has received Army Corps of Engineers and FDEP permits to construct a 1,225 ft long stone revetment and sidewalk in the northwest corner of the park. Project will begin at the boat ramp and follow the shoreline west around the Historical Museum to AlA's right-of-way. The grant application will be for $250,000 and the County has a commitment from the state to cover an additional $250,000 to complete the project. The FDEP commitment letter is attached and County staff will manage the project. FUNDS AVAIL.: Matching funds will come from Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Beaches and Coastal Systems. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board approved the grant amendment ($16,000) with FIND for the design and permitting of the shoreline stabilization project at South Causeway Island. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the submittal of a grant application to Florida Inland Navigation District and approve the Resolution for Assistance Under the Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program. COMMISSION ACTION: [X ] APPROVED [ [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: --(-}-- Originating Dept: Finance: _ Susan Lawrence AgsFIND DENIED Coordination/Sic Mgt & Budget: Public Works: CONCURRENCE: Douglas Anderson County Administrator matures Purchasing: Other: _ vow M ATTACHMENT E-6 ST. LUCIE COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 01-83 RESOLUTION FOR ASSISTANCE UNDER THE FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WHEREAS, THE St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners are interested in carrying out the following described project for the enjoyment of the citizenry of St. Lucie County and the State of Florida: Project Title: Shoreline Stabilization Project for South Causeway Island Total Estimate Cost: $500,000 Brief Description of Project: To construct a 1,224 ft long stone revetment to protect the eroding shoreline along the northwest corner of South Causeway Island Park. The Park is open to the public and owned by St. Lucie County. This project will prevent further erosion of the northwest corner of the park and thus limit the amount of sediment entering the Intracoastal Waterway and the Indian River Lagoon. AND, Florida Inland Navigation District financial assistance is required for the program mentioned above, NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners that the project described above be authorized, AND, be it further resolved that said St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners make application to the Florida inland Navigation District in the amount of 50% of the actual cost of the project in behalf of said St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners AND, be it further resolved by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners that it certifies to the following: 1. That it will accept the terms and conditions set forth in FIND Rule 66B-2 F.A.C. and which will be a part of the Project Agreement for any assistance awarded under the attached proposal. 2. That it is in complete accord with the attached proposal and that it will carry out the Program in the manner described in the proposal and any plans and specifications attached thereto unless prior approval for any change has been received from the District. 3. That it has the ability and the intention to finance its share of the cost of the project and the project will be operated and maintained at the expense of said St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners for public use. 4. That it will not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color or national origin in the use of any property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this proposal, and shall comply with the terms and intent of the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, P.L. 88-352 (1964) and design and construct all facilities to comply fully with statutes relating to accessibility by handicapped persons as well as other federal, state and local laws, rules and requirements. ..r 5. That it will maintain adequate financial records on the proposed project to substantiate claims for reimbursement. 6. That it will make available to FIND if requested, a post -audit of expenses incurred on the project prior to, or in conjunction with, request for the final 10% of the funding agreed to by FIND. This is to certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly and legally adopted by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners at a legal meeting held on this 27th day of March 2001. Attest Title Signature Title �. �_. `- r'? ._ .� £ !- a a..,_s � �C • is .`, �"41�y'� <i �` ;� ar,4z� -•Y � -j -L 1 yH, � � f=... n� i T � L �y'p'Y roil �: - YL \ -a ai.�, e .1 } is q :,�,�''' y1 .��i h -ij _, _ - i ��� �� � T l � �� a�� '�m—'� ��' 4 i ;��'3i.r , _.tea � ��� j TC� i �-. i ��y� _A t L l y Y � ai �1_ R�" � �� �y �:-� ro — ' . � �� �'� ��,�� \Y �+3�' i ��' ��� �$ `� t� b ': Y�'�' L ;'� �+ '- " � � J Y 2 U ti W U 07 Q i ' F ' {Jd S 48 R A j is$a• 6[a�� sty §� € 3�; , yi6�33gf (`s`s5€"japaagsg IMP; $H��,��e�°$ � ��i��i�;�iaaY6 if7�sC��a,i�-� f:� � o m � �� $ � '♦>R 1 ! r i .$ i6ete je yy Ye 6 s} Tje_si it {� 7 Q_ w Q dtt wa_—_= N•i .{i d�`d d�d M 2l�d>il�f$$ase t$i;i$ d = p � � I r 0 e „ i� �Ih � u ti �♦ — O A N 1 N m qq V a 9 � � � 4 �~ � If V S 1 CT {`✓' of �� 3e I jig d OD f 04 D j 3 S 3 d e LO IL list m .�I q • r '� 2 U ti w p U ID Q Jeb Bush Governor Department of Environmental Protection Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 August 29, 2000 Richard Bouchard, P.E. St. Lucie County Engineering Division 2300 Virginia Avenue 2nd Floor Annex, Room 229 Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 Dear Mr. Bouchard: David B. Struhs Secretary 11>!!6 3 1 20M ENGINE-E �'G SUBJECT: North and South Causeway Island Shoreline Stabilization This letter is in response to your request dated May 17, 2000 for state financial support on work that has previously taken place on the North and South Causeway Island Stabilization Projects. The Department has reviewed the information provided by St. Lucie County as it relates to shoreline stabilization outlined in Chapter 161, F.S. The County has requested $152,391 of expended funds be credited for the local cost share of these projects. Department staff has determined that $45,259 of these expenditures used for surveys, design, permitting and development of a mitigation plan directly relates to shoreline stabilization and are eligible for reimbursement. An additional $8,451 in County expenditures relating to Sod Installation and Removal of Cracked Concrete on the South Causeway may be eligible if sufficient justification can be provided. Pending submittal of invoices and proof of payment, the County could be eligible for reimbursement of fifty percent of the above mentioned project costs. The remaining activities in your request are not eligible under Chapter 161, F.S. for state funding. The ineligible items include costs associated with parking improvements; aesthetic vegetation plantings and staff time. The County has also proposed additional engineering services that appear to be eligible project costs. These services include $25,531 associated with the bidding and construction management of the south causeway revetment, and $30,659 to conduct a feasibility study of a shoreline stabilization structure for the north causeway. Construction costs associated with the actual shore protection structures for the causeways will be eligible for cost sharing, but the County must submit competitive bidding information as required under Chapter 287, F.S., and receive state approval for all scopes of work. These requirements are written as standard language in our state contracts. Furthermore, ancillary features such as walkways and landscaping will not be eligible for reimbursement. "More Protection, Less Process Printed on recyckd Paper. %W v Richard Bouchard, P.E. August 29, 2000 Page Two If you have any questions regarding the North and South Causeway Island reimbursement tabulations, please contact myself or Ms. Jackie Thompson at 850/487-1262. Sincerely, Environmental Administrator Office of Beaches and Coastal Systems PEW/jt cc: Ken Pruitt, State Representative Terry E. Lewis, Lewis, Longman and Walker Kirby B. Green, DEP Deputy Secretary i.+ AGENDA REQUEST NNW ITEM NO. C3C DATE: March 27. 2001 REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING:( ) CONSENT: (XX) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESEN rY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works Dept./Solid Waste Division ^- _ Leo J. Cordeiro Solid Waste Manager SUBJECT: Staff requests the Board of County Commissioner's approval of Change Order #2 and Final Payment, to Sheltra & Son Construction Company, Inc., in the sum of $167,869.76, bringing the new contract amount to $2,086,700.81. This amount is $69,883.69 less than the contract amount approved on October 10, 2000. $60,000 of this credit/deduct is to amend Purchase Order #P9812870 to Camp Dresser & McKee for additional engineering services rendered due to contractor delays. Contractor agreed to pay for these services as reflected in the final Change Order. BACKGROUND: On December 8, 2000, bids were opened for the Class 1, Cell 3A Construction and Leachate Force Main Relocation. Eighty-eight vendors were notified, twenty-seven sets of bid documents were distributed and nine bids were received. The low bidder was Sheltra & Son in the amount of $2,114,100. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Account #401-3410-563000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: * January 11, 2000, the Board awarded Bid 00-001 Class 1 Cell 3A Construction and Leachate Force Main Relocation to the low bidder, Sheltra & Son Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $2,114,100. * October 10, 2000, the Board approved Change Order #1, for an increase of $42,484.50 and an increase of 37 days in contract time, bringing the original contract sum from $2,114,100 to the total sum of $2,156,584.60 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioner's approval of Change Order#2 and Final Payment, to Sheltra & Son Construction Company, Inc., in the sum of$167,869.76, bringing the new contract amount to $2,086,700.81. This amount is $69,883.69 less than the contract amount approved on October 10, 2000. $60,000 of this credit/deduct is to amend Purchase Order #P9812870 to Camp Dresser & McKee for additional engineering services rendered due to contractor delays. Contractor agreed to pay for these services as reflected in the final Change Order. COMMISSION ACTION: )l APPROVED ❑ DENIED O OTHER: Review and Approvals CONCURRENCE: f l —Z Douglas Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: L"' Management and Budget: [ 7 Purchasing: W'briginating Dept: Pub. Wks. ( Other: (Landfill) ❑ Other: (❑ Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: CDMCamp Dresser & hcKee Inc. oonsulbhg corwfrcctlan qpmfi� 1701 State Road A-1-A, Suite 301 Vero Beach, Florida 32963 Tel: 561231-4301 Fax: 5612314332 March 8, 2001 Mr. Leo Cordeiro Solid Waste Manager St. Lucie County 6120 Glades Cut-off Road Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 Subject: Amendment to Purchase Order No. P9812870 Additional Professional Services During the Construction of the Phase III Cell 3A Landfill Expansion and Leachate Force Main Relocation Contractor: Sheltra & Son Construction Co., Inc. Dear Mr. Cordeiro: Enclosed for payment is our invoice in connection with additional services rendered during the construction of the Phase III Cell 3A Landfill Expansion and Leachate Force Main Relocation at the Glades Cutoff Road Landfill. Please note that the amount of this invoice was included as part of the negotiated final change order with Sheltra & Son Construction Co., Inc. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER &�MCKEE INC. qEricrotke, P.E. EJG/rb File: 6277-23397-066 Enclosures W52e.d= ,%We *,of Bcc: A. Makled L. Donofrio D=m*M Co 1.w EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES WORK UNDER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT GLADES CUT-OFF ROAD LANDFILL PHASE III CELL 3A LANDFILL EXPANSION AND LEACHATE FORCE MAIN RELOCATION Scope of Services Additional Services During Construction Personnel Hours Dollars Site Project Representative 488 $29,280 Professional II 120 $12,000 Senior Professional 120 $14,400 Principal 32 $4,320 Total $60,000 Use a Lump Sum Amount $60,000 dM20.Eoc CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. =su" 6365N.W.6thWay,Suite320 eV009r^V Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 0° bvcw Tel:954776-1731 Fax:954928-1649 opmuom ST LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA MR LEO CORDEIRO MANAGER SOLID WASTE 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE, FL 34982 Amount Due This Invoice: $60,000.00 .r' Please Remit To: P.O. BOX 530623 DEPARTMENT NUMBER 1 I ATLANTA, GA. 30353-0623 MARCH 07, 2001 INVOICE NUMBER: 80087734/32 PROJECT NUMBER: 23397 PAYMENT REQUEST NI PLEASE INCLUDE INVOICE NUMBER ONALL CORRESPONDENCE In accordance with the agreement between St. Lucie County and Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., dated May 22, 1990 and Notice -to -Proceed, dated January 27, 1998, we are rendering the following invoice for engineering services described below: PHASE IIIA AND REROUTING OF THE LEACHATE FORCE MAIN -PURCHASE ORDER #P9812870 RE: PART A: CLASS I -PHASE III:CELL 3A DESIGN, PERMITTING, BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Additional Services through February 28, 2001 Contract Amount: $ Lump Sum Amount: $ Percent Complete: Billed ITD: $ Less Previously Invoiced: $ Amount Due: $ Total: $ 60,000.00 Loretta C. Donofrio, Contract Affininistrator I certify that everything on this invoice is correct. 60,000.00 60,000.00 100.00% 60,000.00 00.00 60,000.00 3 /-7 /0 1 Date r.. CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. cnn Ubv engineervig LVIISfIIKIl0r1 1701 State Road A-1-A, Suite 301 Vero Beach, Florida 32963 Tel: 561231 A301 Fax: 561231-4332 March 7, 2001 Mr. Leo Cordeiro Solid Waste Manager St. Lucie County 6120 Glades Cut-off Road Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 Subject: St. Lucie County Glades Cut-off Road Landfill Class I Cell 3A Landfill Expansion And Leachate Force Main Relocation CDM Project No. 6277-23397-066 Application for Payment No.11 (Final) Dear Mr. Cordeiro: Enclosed are six copies of Application for Payment No.11 (Final) and Change Order No. 2 submitted by Sheltra & Son Construction Co., Inc. for the above referenced project. Also enclosed is the Consent of Surety to Final Payment. We have reviewed this application and recommend payment as follows: Original Contract Amount $2,114,100.00 Change Order No.1 $42,484.50 Change Order No. 2 ($69,883.69) Final Contract Amount $2,086,700.81 Previously Recommended Payments $1,918,831.05 Final Payment Due $167,869.76 The only remaining deliverable due from the Contractor is the Contractor's Final Release, a copy of which is enclosed for your convenience. Please be sure to have the Contractor execute the Final Release in exchange for the Final Payment. Please send us a copy of the executed Contractor's Final Release for our files. ro3e3o mo V VM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Mr. Leo Cordeiro March 7, 2001 Page 2 If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. Eric 4jro- EJG/rb File: 6277-23397-066 Enclosures cc: R. Sheltra rb3530 dm Sent bj:Ta9lor Consulting Mar-06-01 03141vn from 561 563 0129i5612314332 ►age 2 03/Os/O1 11:50 VLL gu-r 643 arrr __. -. Nf10t11bINwSum" Bows March 6, 2001 St Lucie County Board of County Colmmissioners clo Camp, Dresser & McSee, Inc. 1601 irolveden Road Suite 211 South West palm Beach, Florida 33406 Re: Glades Cut-off Road Landfill Class I Cell 3A Landfill Expansion And Leachate Force MakP440cwt0n SLC No. 00-001 Gentlemen: Great American Insurance Company, as Sump+, on Bond Nwn6er 3976551, hereby coruents to payment under the contract by St. Lucie Cowuy Board of County Commissioners to Sheltra & Son Construction CAL. Inc pursuant to Final Pay Application ii11, in the amount of E167,869 76 Sincerely, GREAT AMERICANINSURANCE COMPANY Finact's T. O'Reardon, Attorney-&-Faa FO'Rfpps r.O.Ormwr672.o Fl.7M-ftT2•p M,kla io*mu$•OOaW4FlJLW714t WA647-1"0•rlWA1514U*331-7379 PAX WM IA3,UM .Sent by:Taylor 65nsultiSut a44M 01106-01 03t41v".___. fro" 561 563 0129i5612314332 Page 3/ 3 03/06101 •11: _ $Itfr95111. wl1 " . 580 WALNUT i7HEW N61N�NMMMtO 45202 � s FAX 673-723 2?W POWER 01FATTORm 15559 The number of persons surbotimd by this povret of attorney is not mate than pipg No.O KNOW ALl_ Mist'( BY THESE PRESENTS: That tM GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. atorporahon o d begod and exiatttl; under ttad by vt[[1R of the lama of the Swc of Obio, doesheteby noadnau•eomiLum and appoiotthe parson er peraousntrmed beltw tend stead to eaectttelis behaU of the said Company, as surety, any and AN b*M% or other writteaobfrPtiona inthaaature thereof: (or all obuseeine3udina any and an emaWstaquired it: lave and hwfut utotmy-ia tea Test G and in ill came, piece andl or Baal estimates; provided that the undenatinga and watraeu olsnrexyship, by theDcpartmeatofTransportation,StateofFlorida,iaideat adsuxtysty'pex4entedr>thMillieisaatbontySMOcoteaoaedthehoursuced frab&Y o(tbessid Company an anysuch toad, urdestakin6 Limit of Power below. Address ALL Natter TODD L. JORMW JOANN H. HFDffl'BDh U,TxrM 30SWH D. JOi SM, JR• PAKMA P. 3+II'14i 0KRIP0r FLOa FFANCYS T. O'PZOC =1 This Poser of Attorney makes aLL previous powers issued is behalf C the ANYitorhas caused named above- This WITNESS W fIEREOF theGREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY has auasd these preetaswllestgtled and atlesl� by day or May 1498 its appropriate otfteen and its corporate seat kateat affitrod this GREAT AME3tjCAN MSURANCE COMPANY I.,A.qunl .Sic'ntYn STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF HAMILTON — a: before me persaoaBy appeared DOUGLAS R. BOWEN, to me On this 2ith day of Kays 19900o. that he w the via President of the Bond Division of Ortau known, being duly sworn, deposes Rod says that ire resided is whicinnati,ch executed tithe thathe knows clue scat:thatitwes so dfuNd American Insurance Company, the Company described in and which eiweuted the above instrument; by authority or his office under the By -Laws of said Company. and that he signed db'is/name thereto by like auhhority. r�y MPufnal �eEUGHERTY M�a�auu of a" l✓,. WIy CarepiStan EChus Aug. 12,200i ` G authority of the folbwing resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Gent Amedi This power of Attorney is granted by ean ittsakarrce Company by unanimous writtenR cement dated Matra 1. 1993. RESOLVED: palm the DYvWOH Pre%idcW. tbeaesera1 Afvaion Y/ce 1°ro"daot+and a on buN Yale Pr ehaydi Comp s, ter gay oar of ablled ail e; e and Hereby is a utborired,from timeto time, to appoint one or moreAllerr�-fm eaterto fflarao(,'to prescribe their Impactive dales y, SS surety. add the bonds, nadem is�gs and contracts orsuretysbip, or other writwo oMiBa respective limits of their authority; and to revoke any such APPOintment at say brae. RESOLVER FURTHER: That Me C40MPSDY real and the iWatum of any of the aroreaatd otffeers and any Secretary yr Assia[Ynt Secrxary or the ComPaoy may be affixed by facsimile to any Power of armeeeY or csrffEcer of either gitte for the esauaog of any hood, uadeitatdng, contrxt orsuretyshiP, orothe"wribea obhgabaa mthe nature thereof. suehaigatobesed send winding u do the Ci all"myoPMdby Lbe Company as Nc arfgiaaf sigaatttre of such o(fiar gad the origiud seat of the Company. to be valid and binding upon the Company wishrbe se)sre form and effect ter though otanud* ayaed. CBJT IFICATION I, RONALDS. HAYES, Assistant $4LRtary of Great American Imuraxe Company, do herahy certify that the foregoieg Povret of Attorney and tM Resolutions of the Board Of Directors of March 1, 1993 have net been revolted and arc *ow io foLL for and effect. ` Signed still seal6TH des or MARCH 2001 ed this Y �3 � gt3latu,l/.Secretary s1151c (ill") (fl.001DN %NW O � 8 s 8 IL W W Q z Or Z r W U ? W ZZ.. oW< z c gm IL a: ra LL N W a LLA J O LU Z Z Z as w03Z0 <arO wU K O O1 CO s O to o�mao om o o�oo 00 �� �Mf- aq � aND co O� woo p N y Y! p Y! to V) N W M/ g x LLI WO m U �w gI a N jFGN W W K Z f., OGQ 7X N UQ o4y� O W y3rc� y�Lu i W b F E p 0 LU $p �e� U UOCmo U' Q�Q $$ W a U W$ 9 U c Z a Z Kr ¢33- 1(0 0 0_y U O K 0 7 J 0 Z v aU Q€ _; H M IT U) fG 1� N z O N SW w 3 �o a } ? m CD ti p w N a O m a wN w 9 0 0 ` PnSad NS R77-08 P,,Wl, Eft Mo.11-Fk.l Flom: ShMa 6 Son CNWUutm Co. Im P.rla.k for PnSM P""Wrt C r gpplbtbn DM : FES 28, 01 . Palbd From: DEC 16, W _ To: FES 211. at To: a Luck Catwq Sam of Ca•^�°n•m E1M Y.bnatlm flan olyknl m onutdommmt CaMmro (t) tl.01gh (6) StowWn00c mmpkbd to dm. undm canted Itim Cma mmmMMl (9) Sneerthe tllMmn bGh " M M k, Cabmlk (e) ma (s) Gdumn (9) to D�a Tool Ca,.Pmt6 Unit Coat TOM cod SIaM sll Tn Sm m6 abow S.ln Damlplbn at SM a MII pat unit ASoln Units Cal MM1. 6. No1.61M. to C1 K. .11/ ntabb of Ymb Il S y f 9 to 11 1 2 3 , s S3ZWO.00 $411.000.00 1.00 S14ODD.00 $0.00 SMOG $411,000.00 i Mobnmtbn LS L9 , p2,1m.00 f$OOOm 1.00 sm.000.00 2 Som 1 SA500.00 SS0.600.00 1.00 MWO.00 p0.300.OD woo s0.00 $0.00 50.00 s0 500.01) 3 MIDc. Sb rmwl.fm LS , sm.000.00 $2b5.,m.00 t.m S255.0D0.00 $0.00 WOO omoo 5255,000.00 Of it Gonunon Fll.m Ok.OM Of it 1 G LS s170.000.00 1.00 $170,010.00 Sim so.m s170.0moo 5 Praneaa6 FM dry LS 1 $170}100.00 SWADOLOD 1.0o fega00.W SO.m $0.a0 SSe.000.00 e City Lkm m. tnwk Ls 1 $50.gq.00 5320.000.00 1.D0 SMODOW $D.OD $0.00 $=.000.OD 7 S.m11Mq'L•1•1 LS t vao.omD0 WD.000.00 S12O,(00M 1.ao 3/2o,OW.00 fo.a $D.00 312o.000.00 5 � Ls LS 1 1 S12D.o00.00 S12D.000.00 1.00 s120.ODD.OD SOSO $0.00 io.W s120,1p0.00 $1f6,000.OD 9 D.01m.fs LS i simi' .00 S186.000.00 t.DD $1f6.000.00 $0.00 $oDm it00,00D.00 10 PIkn,W L!KK LS 1 s1o0,000.00 S1oo.o0O.o0 COO $100.000.00 9DM 1 W $1O0.010.00 11 t9.alkt Ls , slo0.000.00 StO0.000.00 1.00 $100,000.00 SO.00 So 00 $2skoo0.00 12 13 Gaon! Pmcoo.a Sand OW PdmMyLMf LS , SM.ODD.00 iZ8g.000.00 1.00 f2sko0D.00 SS,oOo.W $000 f0.00 $0W 11 L..dl.l. Cdi,t Syabm Pb•N k MM LS 1 $B4OOO.00 sS.o0D.0o t.00 1.OD $10,000.00 $0.00 $D.00 SD.00 10.000.o0 Sf0.o00.00 15 LarAW 0.11c11o1161'•a^MH LS t $10,000.00 $10.000.00 $25,000.00 1.00 525.00D.00 Som $0.00 W.000.00 to L.odwb DM.dbn Sump Pump Pumpcamo LS 1 825 OD:D.00 19.000.OD 1.00 $9.00D.00 $0.00 $0.00 39,000.00 17 LeMkk D.bctbn sump LS 1 $' WOW t4,000.00 1.00 f4,0m.00 $0.00 S1.000.00 11 Lo.dkb DM¢lkn sump EbWk.l LS 1 $/.OW.00 S,O.00mm 1.00 S70,o00.00 $D.00 $0.00 W.QD f10.000.00 19 3aa0bS LS 1 fto.a00.00 S7.5com f7.e00.00 /.OD f0.0D s0.00 57.omoll 20 MW. Wak m00M.wb9 LS 1 s37.o0030 S37.OD0.00 1.00 37.600.00 $37.000.00 smo0 f37.o000O 21 Lmdob FOms MMO R.kmOM LS 1 $7.000.00 $7.0W.00 1.00 S5.000.00 $0.00 SD.00 s/.000.00 22 WMIF rlOonmmt LS 1 56,000.00 $6,000.00 1.01) s6.0o0.W 30.00 f0.00 23 M Ciwrwp LS 1 {36.000.00 f25,000.00 1.W f25.000.OD $0.00 20.00 i0.00 25,Ms5loD-m s20,000.00 24 Ladnt. POV CWKtbn B MmIab LS 1 $20.000.00 1.00 f20.000.00 s0.00 $0.00 SOD�000.W 25 L.oachlb OobcOm.n M1d6 LS 1 $20.000.00 VW,O M10.000.OD 1.00 S50.000.00 $0.00 f0.W f50,000m m Rlnt RmkR3a0110106 W,W Ls , .00 $75.00D.00 S75.ODO.Do 1.00 AS.DDD.DD $0.00 s0.00 575,000.00 Pp LS 1 , f10.000.00 st0.000m 1.00 f70.110D.00 50.00 $0.00 St0.orAm 27 Plpbp136otalbGall btbmkb LS s100.D0 $100.00 1.00 s1Do.00 $0.00 SD.DD 3100.a0 29 ca,ub.nDan br1110Mnnslmikn LS , S6.000.00 S5,DOO.Do 1.00 s5,DDom 50.00 f5.00D.OD W Dano018.tlon - LS Ls 1 1 s".000.00 s25.00o.00 1.W S26,OOo.00 $D.Oo i26.O0om $10.000.00 31 9a011 C r u cmn B Oklm 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.00 f10.000.00 $0.00 so.m $0.00 s0.00 000.00 32 sm Re.bNbn 6 S.Wb0 LS eu mnm tm S%�0W.00 SO.m f3.00 S3S yr AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works Dept./Solid Waste Division SWO ITEM NO. C313 DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR:( ) PUBLIC HEARING:( ) CONSENT: (XX) PRESENT eo J. Cordeiro Solid Waste Manager SUBJECT: Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners' approval for the purchase of one used trailer and two used tandem converter dollies, for a grand total of $15,550. BACKGROUND: The Glades Road Landfill currently has one trailer for the balefill facility. A second trailer, as well as two dollies (one for each trailer), are needed to transport bales of garbage to the top of the landfill. Staff has worked with the Purchasing Department and received three quotes for these items. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Equipment Account #401-3410-664000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners' approval for the purchase of one used trailer and two used tandem converter dollies, for a grand total of $15,550. COMMISSION ACTION: R1 APPROVED O DENIED O OTHER: ❑ County Attorney: CON / NCE: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals i ® Management and Budget roPurchasing: ® Originating Dept: Pub. Wks. ' �-® Other: (Landfill) ❑ Other: ❑ Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 561-462-1777 or TTD 561-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting. m «� kNow %nd a\) j \0 \ m .. z m @ � k § / 2 2 0) n \r { 4. 2 \ k § 2 ( \ CO) \} r kk ,is, co 0 �§ fb m� \ \ \ �k , --I■ 7 m \la m o » n y� °M ,T n 2 q G } to Q In g }T /m ^� ■ o z § �k § g z / k m \ m \m :� k \ k0 - kB_ k \ ) �S 2 <* B z 2 Q ) i 7 k 0 \o \ \ <\ °§ § 7 \§ § § � _ :\§ � < ■ » \q ^° s z k 71 \ m § a � m $ 9t % § \ 2 P \ §� 2 7 � / � q ) k� \ Fn n -jC 3 ;a m� \ © \ mk w■ ■ » ° a :■ T � m ° o0 ■ -n G :m :§ § I n I §; 0c ■ °m m r2 ■ ) s � m # �k § § \ CDk < A A km f A \� § \2 § . o � :( M F9R-15-R1 04:58 HM R.01 *ow '"w/' EXPO MOTORS, INC. 1161 T. LUC1E BLVD. BUS. (a") 465.3199 5017 S FORT T. C, FL VD. HOME fWG) 464.9348 3 _ J 5- O 1 FNA S,6I- q6S-3199 F ps : Csb� y 69 -1 6 SOLi'a wAsr-(� b? Vf,sl'ON �ix(561) 0, L t 4 S CC dw7 A 1V i} GL— tL cv A llcl-- y 7)zA) L—sg ' T N T'1c y 0 LA P--D 5 y'A,5 �� s - 03."_5i2001 10:38 PLTcRMFtrJ 5H7P 00 1561462658? NO. E51 Or 1 '`✓ w% ALTERMAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC. F,\TCt:I'14F OFFICE? l2ko NW 42nd AVQ.. ?.O. HOX, 425, LIRA MAXA, FL 330A. t401 PIiCNL•'',;3051 E8fi•i571-FAX:(105)6F811.723 uww ul:mrwn.c<�, CI(®'��: %IC56R(Q1BIiYTOni.Hli 01n: 8-4mb:111 FROM: VERNON ROARK V.P. MAINTENANCE TO: BOB DERSAM RE: QUOTE — CON IRTER DOLLIES PER YOUR RECENT CONVERSATION WITH VERNON ROAM WE SUBMIT BELOW THE PRICE OF THE TWO (2) TANDEM CONVERTER DOLLIES; 19M BOONE -- SERIAL NL:KBERS 1014 & 109018 54500.00 EACH ... $ 99000.00 DELIVERY TO YOUR LOCATION IN FT.PIERCE ... 450.00 S 9,450.00 PLUS b.S"/. SALES TAX �614 TOTAL ... WE WOULD REQL IRE CASHIER'S CHECK FOR THE TOTAL STATED ABOVE. DELIVERY: WE WILL DELIVER ON A LOW BOY TRAILER AND YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY EQUIPMENT, (IE: CRANE OR L%XGE .FORKLIFT) TO UNLOAD THE IOW BOY. WE WILL NEED YOU TO FURNISH US WITH. A DELIVERY ADDRESS AND DIRECTIONS TO YOUR UNLOAD SITE. WE WILL ALSO NEED TO KNOW WHEN WE CAN DELIVER — SATURDAY MORNING OR AFTERNOON WOULD BE MORE CONVENIENT. KINDLY ADVISE IN WHOSE NAME THE BILL OF SALE IS TO BE MADE OUT. -TERMINALS. ATLANTA•ORIOGOPORT•CHARL01'fE. CHICAGO- DALLAS• JACKSONVILLE• MIAMI. ORANGE 0141ANDO • PENSACOLA • RIPON • ROCKY MOUNT O TALLAHASSCE'TAMPA • TOTOWA • WREST PALM OEACH • WINTL•R IIAVI]N ., AGENDA REQUEST It\fir TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works Dept./Solid Waste Division %Wd ITEM NO. C3E DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING:( ) CONSENT: (XX) i SENT Y: Leo J. Cordeiro Solid Waste Manager SUBJECT: Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners' approval to advertise for bids for the sale of a 1990 surplus crane - Effer Model 8600-23 Articulating Crane. BACKGROUND: In 1990, Board of county Commissioners authorized the purchase of the a truck to service the recycling igloos previously used for recycling in St. Lucie County. The Solid Waste Division transferred the igloo truck to the Leisure Services Department in 2000, to be used as a tree spade truck. The crane was removed prior to transferring the truck and is presently being stored at the Glades Road Landfill. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners' approval to advertise for bids for the sale of a 1990 surplus crane - Effer Model 8600-23 Articulating Crane. COMMISSION ACTION: M APPROVED O DENIED O OTHER: Review and Approvals County Attorney: ❑ Management and Budget: CONCU E: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Purchasing: Originating Dept: Pub. Wks. ' �' 12Other: (Landfill) ❑ Other: ❑ Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 561-462-1777 or TTD 561-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting. cog COGy AGrNDA REQUEST a o �oP TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 ITEM N C-H DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] PRESENTED BY: Donald B. West, P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Amendment to Work Authorization No. 1 with Hazen & Sawyer Engineers, Inc., for the evaluation of Ft. Pierce Farms Water Control District Canal System to handle additional discharge from Lakewood Park. BACKGROUND: On November 8, 2000, the Board approved Work Authorization No. 1 in the amount of $17,100 with Hazen & Sawyer Engineers, Inc., for evaluation of the Ft. Pierce Farms Canal System. This budget amount included $3,000 for surveying services. As indicated in the attached letter, additional surveying services are required in the amountof $4,770.00. This will increase the total budget amount to $21,870.00. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in 330-4114-563003-3803 - LWP Fund/Capital Projects PREVIOUS ACTION: 1996 Study, Hazen & Sawyer Engineers, Inc. 2000 Study, Hazen & Sawyer Engineers, Inc.. October 8, 2000 - Board approved Work Authorization No. RECOMMENDATION: Engineering staff recommends approval of Amendment to Work Authorization No. 1 with Hazen & Sawyer Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $4,770 for additional surveying services required for the evaluation of the Ft. Pierce Farms Water Control District Canal System and signature by the Chairman. COMMISSION ACTION: ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: [x]CountyAttorney N v [x]Originating Dept. Public Wales ;y4— []Rnance (check for copy only, if applicable) fpfwodh&svaaag CONCURRENCE: Douglas Anderson County Administrator CoordlnatlonfSlgratures �.q//J [x]Mgt. & Budget \ /jy /Jy Ix]Revenue Coord. c V1 [x]Co. Fig � l laha HAZENAND SAFER Environmental Engineers & Scientists March 20, 2001 Donald B. West County Engineer ST. LUCIE COUNTY 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Dear Mr. West: Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. Mardi Executive Center 1905 South 25th Street Fort Pierce, FL 34947 561 489-0066 Fax: 561 489-0299 After conducting a search of existing data for Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District (FPFWCD) Canals 3, 4 and 5 draining out of Lakewood Park we have found little available. The few pieces of data that are available are of questionable use. We have also spoken with Marty Sanders of LBFH, engineer for FPFWCD and he has indicated the District would require the analysis be based upon survey data. We suggested that culverts in these canals be located by approximate distance along the canal length and elevation information be measured utilizing corrected GPS. While measuring elevation using this method is accurate to 0.1' (vertical) this method is considerably less time and labor intensive, thus less costly, than traditional closed loop bench runs. Mr. Sanders indicated this accuracy would be acceptable. Unfortunately, the effort required to survey all of the culverts still considerably exceeds the anticipated survey budget allowance of $3,000 indicated in our contract. We have developed a subcontract for surveys of all culverts in these canals. The survey estimate for all structures is $7,770. We are requesting a change in Work Authorization No. 1 in the amount of $4,770 for unanticipated additional surveying services. We thank you for your consideration on this matter. If you require additional information please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, frey�j. Anton, P.E. ncipal Engineer RP. 40363L00l New vote, NY • Armonk, NY • woeaburv. NY • Jpper eaMe River, NJ • eefgn, MI • Raleigh, NC • Charlotte, NC • Fairfax, VA • Hollywooq FL • Boca Ratan, FL • red Pierce, FL • Gafnesvllle, FL • Sarasota, 11 • Miami, Ft AMENDMENT TO WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 1 Engineering Services Related to Stormwater Management C00-06-085 e for Ft. Pierce Farms Water Control District Canal System Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and Hazen & Sawyer Engineers, Inc.(the "Engineer") dated June 13, 2000, the Engineer agrees to provide the services in accordance with the Additional Services Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: WITNESSES: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA f33 CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ENGINEER RM Print Name: Hazen & Sawyer, Engineers, Inc. v.. INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND Exhibit A Scope of Work Lakewood Park Surveying Services March 2001 Under Work Authorization No. 1. Hazen and Sawyer included an allowance for surveying services to gather gaps in the data required for engineering calculations for the Lakewood Park Outfall Canals Study. It was discovered in the course of data review that very little accurate data was available. Thus, a significantly greater data collection effort is required. This Work Authorization is to expand the survey data collection SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1 —Additional Surveying Services Consultant will provide additional field data collection of Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District Canals 3, 4 and 5 between the Lakewood Park control structures and Canal No. 1. All structures within each canal will be surveyed using GPS to a vertical accuracy of 0.1 ft. Structures will be located by their distance along the canal alignment. Canal sections will be surveyed every 112 mile. FtP.Pmposals& Lucie Countyo 16 ..� Exhibit B Budget Lakewood Park Surveying Services March 2001 The following provides our estimated costs for completion of the scope of services as described in the previous section. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. proposes to complete this project on a not -to -exceed basis for a total project cost of $4,770. Task 1 —Additional Surveying Services Total $ 4,770 $ 4,770 RP. Pmposals&. LuaeCounty016 1..d Exhibit C Schedule Lakewood Park Surveying Services March 2001 Item Completed From Notice to Proceed Task 1 —Additional Surveying Services 3 weeks RP. Proposals& LucieCount y016 `►. ..0 AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Community Services ITEM NO. C- DATE: March 27, 2001 J REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: Beth Ryder, Director 46, SUBJECT: Acceptance of the FY 2000101 award of $ 1,069,249 for the U.S.C. 5307 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grant and approval of the subgrant agreement with Council on Aging of St. Lucie/ Community Transit. BACKGROUND: Each year since FY 1992/93, St. Lucie County has applied for grant funding from the Federal Transit Administration to fund operating and capital costs for the contracted transportation provider for St. Lucie County, Council on Aging/Community Transit. Memorandum 01-34 is attached. FUNDS AVAIL: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On November 14, 2000, the Board approved the grant application. RECOMMENDATION: Acceptance of the grant award, approval of the subgrant agreement with Council on Aging/Community Transit and authorization for the Chairman to sign all documents necessary. COMMISSION ACTION: CONC RENCE: [� APPROVED [ ] DENIED��Z [ ] OTHER: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney :x� 4�—"Management S Budget: Purchasing: Other: Originating Dept Other. V.. ..r COMMUNITY SERVICES MEMORANDUM # 01-34 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Beth Ryder, Director 0- SUBJECT: Acceptance of the award of $1,069,249 for the Federal Transit Administration 2000101 U.S.0 Section 5307 grant and approval of the subgrant agreement with the Council on Aging of St. Lucie/Community Transit DATE: March 27, 2001 Attached for Board acceptance is the 2000/01 U.S.C. Section 5307 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grant that was awarded on March 1, 2001 and the subgrant agreementwith Council on Aging of St. Lucie/ Community Transit. This grant funds operating and capital costs for the contracted transportation provider for St. Lucie County, Council on Aging of St. Lucie County/Community Transit. The FTA awarded St. Lucie County operating funds of $815,352 and $253,897 for capital purchases. On November 14, 2000 the Board approved the application requesting $1,113,270. The FTA awarded $1,069,249. Included in this application is an administrative fee of $10,000.00 for St. Lucie County. The grant requires 10% match of $23,000 for the vehicles, but those funds will not be appropriated until the FY2001/02 budget. This grant will have no impact on the 00/01 County budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Acceptance of the grant award, approval of the subgrant agreement with Council on Aging/Community Transit and authorization for the Chairman to sign all documents necessary. ,%W 1 rr SUBGRANT AGREEMENT THIS SUBGRANT AGREEMENT, made this day of , 2001, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the "County", and COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST. LUCIE, INC., or its successors, executors, administrators, and assigns hereinafter called the "Council': IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits received by each part, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1. The County shall disperse to the Council a subgrant in a total amount not to exceed one million fifty-nine thousand two hundred forty-nine and 00/100 dollars ($1,059,249.00) pursuant to the FY 2000/200149 U.S.C. Section 5307 Grant Agreement (FTA Project Number FL-90-X414-00), between the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration and the County, hereinafter referred to as the "Grant Agreement". The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the total amount of the award to the County under the Grant Agreement is one million sixty-nine thousand two hundred forty-nine and 00/100 dollar ($1,069,249.00) of which ten thousand and 00/100 dollars ($10,000.00) shall be retained by the County for administration of the grant. The Council shall submit requests for payment to the County in a form acceptable to the County and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement and this Agreement. In addition, the County shall disperse to the Council funds in a total amount not to exceed twenty-three thousand and 00/100 dollars ($23,000.00) as local matching funds pursuant to the Grant Agreement. Such funds shall not be disbursed prior to the County's 2001-02 fiscal year beginning October 1, 2001. Payment to the Council shall be made in one lump sum payment within twenty (20) days after the Council provides the County Community Services Director with a copy of the vehicle registration transfer form and title for the vehicles purchased under the Grant Contract. 2. The grant shall be used only as set forth in the Grant Agreement and the Grant Application, incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with the terms of the Grant Agreement, any vehicles purchased with grant funds disbursed pursuant to this Agreement shall be co -titled in the name of the County and the Council. A County property record number shall be affixed to any equipment purchased with the grant funds at a cost of five hundred and 00/100 dollars ($500.00) or more. The Council agrees to coordinate with the County Purchasing Director in the purchase of any vehicle or other equipment pursuant to this Agreement. 3. The Council shall have internal controls adequate to safeguard the grant. 4. If the grant can not be used or a subsequent audit reveals the grant was not used according to the Grant Agreement, the Grant Application, and/or this Agreement, any money not so used shall be reimbursed to the County. ,%W 1.d 5. The Council shall provide an audit, by a certified or duly licensed public accountant, of the expenditure of monies disbursed pursuant to this Agreement. In the alternative and subject to prior written approval of the County Budget and Management Director, the Council may submit qualifying paid invoices in lieu of a certified audit. In addition, the Council shall provide the County with a copy of the Council's annual audit for each fiscal year during which the Council expends funds received pursuant to this Agreement. The Council shall submit all documents required under this paragraph within ninety (90) days after the end of its last fiscal year during which funds are expended under this Agreement. 6. The Council gives the County the right, until the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, to audit the use of the grant monies. Upon demand, the County shall have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Council involving transactions related to these grant monies. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or until the expiration of three (3) years after the expenditure of the funds. 7. The Council is and shall be an independent contractor, responsible to all parties for all of its acts or omissions and the County shall in no way be responsible for such acts or omission. The Council shall and will indemnify and hold harmless the County from and against any and all liability, claims, damages, expenses, fees, fines, penalties, suits, proceedings, and actions and cost of actions, including reasonable attorney's fees of any kind and nature arising or growing out or in any way connected with the use, occupations, administration or control of the above described services by the Council or its agents, employees, customers, patrons or invitee, or resulting from injury to person or property, or a loss of life or property of any kind or nature whatsoever sustained during the term of this Agreement. The Council hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this Agreement include specific consideration for the indemnification provided herein. 8. The Council agrees to comply with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulation, the terms of the Grant Agreement, and the certifications accompanying the Grant Application.. 9. All publications, media productions and exhibit graphics shall include the following statement: Sponsored in part by the Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County, Florida. 10. Any notice shall be in writing and sent registered or certified mail, postage and charges prepaid, and addressed to the parties at the following address: TO THE COUNTY: St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue, 3`d Floor Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 WITH COPY TO: St. Lucie County Attorney Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue, 3' Floor Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 2 .M I%d TO THE COUNCIL: Council on Aging of St. Lucie, Inc. 1505 Orange Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 11. No amendment, modification or waiver of this Agreement shall be valid or effective unless in writing and signed by both parties and no waiver of any breach or condition of this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other conditions or subsequent breach whether of like or different nature. If the County currently provides or subsequently provides any forms for agreement modification, the Council agrees to use said forms. 12. The Council represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes 112.311(2000) and as may be amended from time to time. The Council further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said performance. The Council shall promptly notify the County in writing by certified mail of all potential conflicts of interest prohibited by existing state law for any prospective business association, interest or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence the Council's judgment or quality of services being provided hereunder. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of work that the Council may undertake and request an opinion of the County as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the County, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the Council. The County I agrees to notify the Council of its opinion by certified mail within thirty (30) days of receipt of notification by the Council. If, in the opinion of the County, the prospective business association, interest or circumstance would not constitute a conflict of interest by the Council, the County shall so state in the notification and shall, at his/her option, enter into said association, interest or circumstance and it shall be deemed not in conflict of interest with respect to services provided to the County by the Council under the terms of this Agreement. 13. In the event of a dispute between the parties in connection with this Agreement, the parties agree to submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non -binding mediation prior to filing a lawsuit. The parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding concerning the disputed issue. 14. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. 3 VWA ..i 15. Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the parties. 16. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous communications, representations or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized officials as of the day and year first written above. ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK ATTEST: SECRETARY gAatty\agreemnt\contract\coa-5 307.01.wpd BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA m CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST. LUCIE, INC. BY: 4 PRESIDENT (SEAL) DOT FTA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Application for Federal Assistance Recipient ID ............ : 1024 Recipient Name......: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Project ID ................: FL-90-X414-00 Budget Number.......: 01 --Approved Project Information..: Capital & Operating Assistance Part 1: Recipient Information Project Number.......: FL-90-X414-00 Recipient ID ............: Recipient Name ......: 1024 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Address ...................: Community Services 437 North 7th Street, FT. PIERCE, FL 34950 0000 Telephone ...............: (561) 462-1772 Facsimile .................: (561)462-1703 Part 2: Project Information Project Type ............: Project Number.......: Project Description..: Recipient Type........: FTA Project Mgr......: Recipient Contact ...: New/Amendment ....: Amend. Reason......: Fed Dom Asst. #.....: Sec. of Statute ........: State Appl. ID..........: Start/End Dates ......: Recvd. by State ......: EO 12372 Rev ........: Review Date ...........: Planning Grant?......: Program Date (STIP/UPWP/FTA Prm Plan) Program Page.........: Application Type .....: Supp. Agreement?..: Debt Delinq. Detail..: Urbanized Areas LIZA Name: FLORIDA LIZA ID: 120000 Grant Gross Project Cost.: $ 2,136,746 FL-90-X414-00 Adjustment Amt......: $ 0 Capital & Operating Assistance Total Eligible Cost...: $ 2,136,746 County Agency Total FTA Arnt........ : $ 1,069,249 Tom McCormick/Elizabeth Martin Total State Amt.......: $ 315,536 Beth Ryder Total Local Amt.......: $ 751.961 New Other Federal Amt..: $ 0 None Specified Special Cond. Amt..: $ 0 20507 Special Condition....: None Specified 5307 S.C. Tgt. Date.........: None Specified FM#235804-1 S.C. Eff. Date..........: None Specified Jul. 01, 2000 - Jun. 30, 2001 Est. Oblig Date .......: 01-jut-2000 Feb. 07, 2001 Pre -Award Auhority? NO NO Fed. Debt Authority? NO None Specified Final Budget? .........: NO NO Aug. 25, 2000 298 Electronic Yes DOT *%-, 0 --1 FTA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration LIZA Name: FORT PIERCE, FL UZA ID: 123280 Conaressional Districts State ID: 12 District Code: 12 District Official: Adam Putnam Project Details THIS GRANT APPLICATION IS FOR CAPITAL AND OPERATING ASSISTANCE INCLUDING THE PURCHASE OF VEHICLES, THE AQUISITION OF ADP HARDWARE AND RADIOS AND FUNDS FOR PROJECT ADMINISTRATION. CAPITAL Replace 3 less than 30 foot vehicles Replacement of 3 vans with less than 30 foot vehicles to include fareboxes and ADA accessability The fleet currently has 13 vehicles that are CNG/gasoline fueled. Acquire ADP Hardware Acquire 3 radios Acquire 3 radios for the 3 replacement vehicles to be purchased under ALI 11.12.04 Project Administration Administration Fee for billing and reporting activities OPERATING 07/01/2001 - 06/30/2001 net operating budget is estimated at $1,828,000. Section 5307 request for operating assistance is in the amount of $815,352. LOCAL MATCH - County Match, TD and Medicaid dollars and Community Transit/Council on Aging STATE MATCH - Cash match - state dollars All necessary information has been input and shows on the screen when viewed, however when attemping to print a copy of the application, the Type Codes for Enviromental Findings are shown as unknown. Part 3: Budget PROJECT BUDGET Quantity FTA Amount Tot Elio. Cost DOT N. Q -w FTA Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Quantity FTA Amount Tot. Elig. Cost SCOPE 111-00 BUS -ROLLING STOCK 3 $ 190,900 $ 230,000 ACTIVITY 11.12.04 BUY REPLACEMENT <30 FT 3 $ 190,900 $ 230,000 BUS (ADA - 83%/17%) SCOPE 114-00 BUS: SUPPORT EQUIP AND FACILITIES $ 51,717 $ 64,646 ACTIVITY 11.42.07 ACQUIRE - ADP HARDWARE $ 51,717 $ 64,646 SCOPE 116-00 SIGNAL & COMM EQUIPMENT (BUS) 3 $ 1,280 $ 1,600 ACTIVITY 11.62.03 PURCHASE RADIOS 3 $ 1,280 $ 1,600 SCOPE 117-00 OTHER CAPITAL ITEMS (BUS) $ 10,000 $ 12,500 ACTIVITY 11.79.00 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION $ 10,000 $ 12,500 SCOPE 300-00 OPERATING ASSISTANCE $ 815,352 $ 1,828,000 ACTIVITY 30.09.00 OPERATING ASSISTANCE - $ 815,352 $ 1,828,000 50% (USE FPC 04) Estimated Net Project Cost: $ 2,136,746 Federal Share: $ 1,069,249 Local Share: $ 1,067,497 OTHER (Scopes and Activities not included in Project Budget Totals) Quantity FTA Amount Tot. Elig. Cost SOURCES OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE LIZA ID Accounting FPC FY SEC Previously Amendment Total Classification Approved Amount 120000 2000.21.90.91.1 00 2001 90 $ 0 $ 253,897 $ 253,897 120000 2000.21.90.91.1 04 2001 90 $ 0 $ 815,352 $ 815,352 Total Previously Approved: $ 0 Total Amendment Amount: $ 1,069,249 Total from all Funding Sources: $ 1,069,249 Alternative Fuel Codes DOT � 0 FTA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration 11.12.04 BUY REPLACEMENT <30 FT BUS (ADA - 83%/17%) Extended Budget Descriptions 11.12.04 BUY REPLACEMENT <30 FT BUS (ADA - 83%/17%) Compressed Natural Gas 3 $ 190,900 $ 230,000 Purchase 3 replacement buses - for: 1) 1993 Dodge Caravan (VIN # 1 B4GH44R4PX676263) placed in service 04/93 -accumulated rev. miles - 76,689. estimated to be taken out of service 12101 - poor condition - original grant purchase under 5311. 2) 1993 Dodge Caravan (VIN # 1 B4GH44R4PZ676262) placed in service 04/93 - accumulated rev.miles - 66,629. estimated to be taken out of service 12/01 - poor condition - original grant purchase under 5311 3) 1994 Dodge van (VIN # 2B5WB35ZORK156282) placed in service 03194 - accumulated rev. miles 72,695. estimated to be taken out of service 12101 - poor condition - original grant purchase under 5311 Part 4. Milestones 11.12.04BUY REPLACEMENT <30 FT BUS 3 $ 190,900 $ 230,000 (ADA - 83%/17%) Milestone Description Est. Comp. Date 1. RFP/IFB OUT FOR BID.................................................................................... Apr. 30, 2001 2. CONTRACT AWARDED.................................................................................. Jun.30,2001 3. FIRST BUS DELIVERED.................................................................................. Oct. 31, 2001 4. ALL BUSES DELIVERED................................................................................. Oct. 31, 2001 5. CONTRACT COMPLETE................................................................................. Oct. 31,2001 11.42.07ACQUIRE - ADP HARDWARE $ 51,717 $ 64,646 Milestone Description Est. Como. Date 1. RFP/IFB Issued................................................................................................ Mar. 31, 2001 2. Contract Award................................................................................................. Apr. 30, 2001 3. Contract Complete............................................................................................ May. 31, 2001 11.62.03PURCHASE RADIOS 3 $ 1,280 $ 1,600 ' Milestone Description Est. Comp. Date 1. RFP/IFB Issued................................................................................................ Mar. 31, 2001 2. Contract Award................................................................................................. Apr. 30, 2001 3. Contract Complete............................................................................................ May. 31, 2001 DOT FTA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration 11.79.00PROJECT ADMINISTRATION $ 10,000 $ 12,500 Milestone Description Est. Comp. Date 1. RFP/IFB Issued................................................................................................ Jan. 31, 2001 This will be drawn as needed in correlation to progress of program of events. 2. Contract Award................................................................................................. Jan.31,2001 3. Contract Complete............................................................................................ Dec. 31, 2002 30.09.00OPERATING ASSISTANCE - 50% $ 815,352 $ 1,828,000 (USE FPC 04) Milestone Description 1. Final Expenditure............................................................. Part 5. Environmental Findings 111204 BUY REPLACEMENT <30 FT BUS (ADA - 83%/17%) Finding No. 1 Est. Comp. Date Jun. 30, 2001 $ 190,900 $ 230,000 Finding Type ..............: Class II(c) Type Code .................: C17-Purchase of vehicles The purchase of vehicles by the applicant where the use of these vehicles can be accommodated by existing facilities or by new facilities which themselves are within a CE. 114207 ACQUIRE - ADP HARDWARE $ 51,717 $ 64,646 Finding No. 1 Finding Type ..............: Class II(c) Type Code .................: C19-Install purchase maintenance equipment Purchase and installation of operating or maintenance equipment to be located within the transit facility and with no significant impacts off the site. T"203 PURCHASE RADIOS 3 $ 1,280 $ 1,600 Finding No. 1 Finding Type ..............: Class II(c) DOT FTA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Type Code .................: C17-Purchase of vehicles The purchase of vehicles by the applicant where the use of these vehicles can be accommodated by existing facilities or by new facilities which themselves are within a CE. 117900 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Finding No. 1 $ 10,000 $ 12,500 Finding Type ..............: Class II(c) Type Code .................: C16-Program Admin. & Operating Assistance Program administration, technical assistance activities, and operating assistance to transit authorities to continue existing service or increase service to meet routine changes in demand. 300900 OPERATING ASSISTANCE - 50% (USE FPC $ 815,352 $ 1,828,000 04) Finding No. 1 Finding Type ..............: Class II(c) Type Code .................: C16-Program Admin. & Operating Assistance Program administration, technical assistance activities, and operating assistance to transit authorities to continue existing service or increase service to meet routine changes in demand. Part 6. Fleet Status Paratransit I. Active Fleet A. Peak Requirement B. Spares C. Total (A+B) D. Spare Ratio (B/A) II. Inactive Fleet A. Other B. Pending Disposal C. Total (A+B) III. TOTAL (I.0 and II.C) Union Information Before Change After 28 0 28 10 0 10 38 0 38 35.71% 0.00% 35.71% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 38 DOT FTA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Recipient ID ............: 1024 Recipient Name......: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Union Name ............: NONE Address I ................: N/A Address 2................: City ..........................: N/A, 00000 0000 Contact Name.........: N/A N/A Telephone ...............: () - Extension: Facsimile .................: 0- Part 7. FTA Comments General Review Comment Title ........: Grant Budget Comment By...........: Elizabeth Martin Date Created ..........: Jan. 23, 2001 Date Updated..........: Ref. Section ............: Project Overview I e-mailed grantte and requested that the budget be revised to reflect the revised Comment ................: FY 2001 apportionments. Comment Title ........: CNG Comment By...........: Elizabeth Martin Date Created ..........: Feb. 07, 2001 Date Updated..........: Ref. Section ............: Project Overview are indicated to be CNG. How much of the existing fleet is CNG? Comment ................: Three vehicles Conditions of Award Comments to DOL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION GRANT AGREEMENT (FTA G-7, October 1, 2000) Upon execution of this Grant Agreement by the Grantee named below, the Grantee affirms the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Award covering the Project described below and records its entry into this Grant Agreement with FTA. The following documents are incorporated by reference and made part of this Grant Agreement: (1) "Federal Transit Administration Master Agreement," FTA MA(7), October 1, 2000 [Internet Address: http://www.fta.dot.gov/library/legal/agreements/2001/ma.html]; and (2) Any Award notification containing special conditions or requirements, if issued. DOT 0 FTA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration FTA OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MAY WITHDRAW ITS OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IF THE GRANTEE DOES NOT EXECUTE TIES GRANT AGREEMENT WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE OBLIGATION DATE OF THE FTA AWARD. FTA AWARD FTA hereby awards a Federal grant as follows: Project No.: FL-90-X414-00 Grantee: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Citation of Statute(s) Authorizing Project: 49 USC 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Estimated Total Eligible Cost (in U.S. Dollars): 2,136,746 Maximum FTA Amount Approved [Including All Amendmentsl (in U.S. Dollars): 1,069,249 Amount of This FTA Award (in U.S. Dollars): 1,069,249 Maximum Percentage(s) of FTA Participation:Percentages of Federal participation are based on amounts included in the Approved Project Budget, modified as set forth in the text following the Project Description below. Date of Department of Labor Certification of Transit Employee Protective Arrangements: Original Project or Certification Date (Amendment Number) n 02/14/2001 Project Description* The Project Description includes information describing the Project within the Project Application submitted to ETA and the Approved Project Budget modified by any additional statements below. Capital & Operating Assistance By Executing the above Grant Agreement, I am simultaneously Executing the attached Supplemental Agreement. Any text, provisions, requirements, or conditions that may appear below the FTA Authorized Official's signature or the Grantee Authorized Official's signature are incorporated into and made part of this Grant Agreement. Awarded By: Tom Thomson 03/01/2001 Regional Deputy Administrator DOT *-, a FTA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administratlon EXECUTION OF GRANT AGREEMENT The Grantee affirms this FTA Award. By executing this Grant Agreement with FTA, the Grantee records its adoptation and ratification of all statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and materials it has submitted to FTA, its consent to this FTA Award, and its agreement to all terms and conditions set forth in this Grant Agreement. Executed by: Frannie Hutchinson 03/05/2001 Chairman DOT FTA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration --- Page 1 ---UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT (Attachment to FTA G-7, October 1, 2000) The Federal Transit Administration is required by 49 U.S.C. ° 5307 to enter into a formal agreement with the Designated Recipient for projects that the Designated Recipient does not carry out directly. Under this Grant Agreement, the Grantee is not the Designated Recipient. Therefore, in accordance with 49 U.S.C. ° 5307, the Designated Recipient hereby agrees to permit the Grantee under this Grant Agreement to receive and dispense the Federal assistance funds described in this Grant Agreement. The Designated Recipient further agrees that the Grantee shall assume all responsibilities set forth in this Grant Agreement. The Federal Government and the Grantee under this Grant Agreement hereby agree that the Designated Recipient is not in any manner subject to or responsible for the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement and is a party to this Grant Agreement only to assign the right to receive and dispense Federal funds to the Grantee as described above. FTA Official: Tom Thomson 03/01/2001 Regional Deputy Administrator Designated Recipient Official: Marion Hart, Jr. 03/02/2001 State Public Transp. Administrator I ,,AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-5A DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR ( ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Marie M. Gouin SUBJECT: Budget Resolution # 01- 76 for the Ft. Pierce Boat Launching Facility Grant awarded by the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) in the amount of $251,986. BACKGROUND: On November 27, 2000, FIND awarded to St. Lucie County a grant covering up to 30% of the expected cost of completion of Ft. Pierce Boat Launch project, $839,954. St. Lucie County Parks & Recreation Dept. identified the following sources of the required local match budgeted under the Little Jim Bridge Boat Ramp project #7954: $394,837 FDEP Ft. Pierce Boat Launch Grant #001241 project #7954 $ 30,000 Impact Fees Fund #310002 project #7954 $ 68,070 FBIP Fund #001003 project #7954 9$ 5,061 FBIP Fund #001229 project #7954 $587,968 FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE: 001808-7210-337325-7954 Ft. Pierce Boat Launch FIND Grant PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners approve Budget Resolutions #01-76 to appropriate and expend the funds from the FIND Ft. Pierce Boat Launch Grant. COMMISSION ACTION: [XI APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: XX Management & Budget: XX' )� r urchasing: IJ " Originating Dept: Public Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX G�\BUDGET\W P\AGENDA'S\Agenda0l\S27Boal_G=Lwpd \r 14 RESOLUTION NO. 01-76 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available from the Florida Inland Navigation District in a form of Ft. Pierce Boat Launch Grant in the amount $251,986. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners, Florida, in meeting assembled this March 27, 2001 pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2000-2001, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 001808-7210-337325-7954 Florida Inland Navigation District $251,986 APPROPRIATIONS 001808-7210-563000-7954 Improvements O/T Buildings $251,986 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2001. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTYATTORNEY COMMISSIONERS TED B. MOORHEAD CHAIR BREVARD COUNTY CHARLESR.FAULKNER VICE -CHAIR FLAGLER COUNTY JOANNALLEN SECRETARY ST LUCIE COUNTY CATHLEEN C. VOGEL TREASURER MIAMI LADE COUNTY M. BRENT WADDELL MARTIN COUNTY LAURENCE O. LOCKER SR0WARD COUNTY GEORGE P. BUNNELL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PIERRE 0. THOMPSON ST JOHNS COUNTY THOMAS P. JONES, JR. DUVAL COUNTY GRAYCE K. BARCK VOLUSIA COUNTY JI-ANG SONG PALM BEACH COUNTY DAVID K. ROACH EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK T. CROSLEY ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 'w FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT COPY December 28, 2000 Mr. Don McLam — Project Manager St. Lucie County Leisure Services 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 RE: Ft. Pierce Boat Launch — Project # SL-00-29 Enclosed is your original copy of the fully executed Project Agreement for the above referenced project. Please note the reporting requirements and project requirements referenced in the agreement. Please contact me if I can be of any further assistance. ZSincer� , ark Crosley Assistant Exe Director I e 2001 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ON THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY IN PALM BEACH COUNTY 1314 MARCINSKI ROAD. JUPITER, FLORIDA 33477-9498 TELEPHONE 561-627 3386 FAX No. 561-524-6480 www aicw org ..> FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT PROJECT AGREEMENT PROJECT NO. SL-00-29 This PROJECT AGREEMENT made and entered into this ,2,-)"k day of 200-6 by and between the Florida Inland Navigation District (hereinafter the "DISTRICT"), and the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter the "PROJECT SPONSOR" ). In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. PROJECT - Subject to the provisions of this Agreement and Rule 66B-2 of the Florida Administrative Code (Exhibit "A"), the DISTRICT has determined to provide assistance funding to the PROJECT SPONSOR in furtherance of an approved project ("PROJECT") consisting of the Ft. Pierce Boat Launch. Said project is more specifically described in the PROJECT SPONSOR'S Waterways Assistance Application, which is on file at DISTRICT headquarters. Any modifications to the PROJECT shall require advance notice to and the prior written approval of the DISTRICT. 2. TERM - The PROJECT SPONSOR shall not commence work on the PROJECT prior to the execution of this Agreement unless specifically authorized by the DISTRICT Board and shall complete the PROJECT and submit all required payment reimbursement information on or before September 1, 2002, unless the PROJECT period has been extended with the prior written approval of the DISTRICT. In no event, however, shall the PROJECT period extend beyond three (3) years from the October 1, 2000. The PROJECT SPONSOR acknowledges there are no provisions to carry over the DISTRICT assistance funding under this Agreement beyond September 30, 2003, and that any extension of funding beyond this date shall be at the sole discretion of the DISTRICT. Any request for extension of funding beyond the date set forth in the preceding paragraph shall require submittal by the PROJECT SPONSOR of a request for extension to the DISTRICT no later than July 1, 2002. This request will then be considered by the DISTRICT Board, whose decision shall be final. 3. ASSISTANCE AMOUNT - The DISTRICT shall contribute no more than Thirty percent (1Q!jJ of the PROJECT SPONSOR'S out-of-pocket costs for completion of this PROJECT ("PROJECT AMOUNT"). Payment of funds by the DISTRICT to the PROJECT SPONSOR (the "ASSISTANCE AMOUNT") will be on a reimbursement basis only, and only for those authorized PROJECT COSTS as shown in Exhibit B and meeting the requirements of Paragraph 5 below and shall not, in any event, exceed $251,986.00. 4. MATCHING FUNDS - The PROJECT SPONSOR warrants and represents that it has the PROJECT SPONSOR Match Amount (the PROJECT AMOUNT less the ASSISTANCE AMOUNT) available for the completion of the PROJECT and shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement, have provided the DISTRICT with suitable evidence of the availability of such funds using DISTRICT Form #95-01 (Exhibit C), and including upon request, providing the DISTRICT with access to applicable books and records, financial statements, and bank statements. 5. PROJECT COSTS - To be eligible for reimbursement under the Project Agreement, PROJECT COSTS must be necessary and reasonable for the effective and efficient accomplishment of the PROJECT and must be directly allocable thereto. PROJECT COSTS are generally described in Exhibit B. PROJECT COSTS must be incurred and work performed within the PROJECT period, with the exception of pre - agreement costs, if any specifically identified in Paragraph 6 below, which are also eligible for reimbursement by the DISTRICT. 2 %.. ..d 6. PRE -AGREEMENT COSTS - The DISTRICT and the PROJECT SPONSOR fully understand and agree that there shall be no reimbursement of funds by the DISTRICT for any obligation or expenditure made prior to the execution of this Project Agreement. 7. REIMBURSEMENT PROCEDURES - PROJECT COSTS shall be reported to the DISTRICT and summarized on the Payment Reimbursement Request Form (Form 990-20) attached as Exhibit D. Supporting documentation including bills and canceled payment vouchers for expenditures shall be provided to the DISTRICT by the PROJECT SPONSOR or LIAISON AGENT with any payment request. All records in support of the PROJECT COSTS included in payment requests shall be subject to review and approval by the DISTRICT or by an auditor selected by the DISTRICT. Audit expenses shall be borne by the PROJECT SPONSOR. Project funds may be released in installments, at the discretion of the DISTRICT, upon submittal of a payment request by the PROJECT SPONSOR or LIAISON AGENT. The DISTRICT shall retain ten percent (10%) of each installment payment until the completion of the PROJECT. The following costs, if authorized in the attached Exhibit B shall be reimbursed only upon completion of the PROJECT to the reasonable satisfaction of the DISTRICT and in accordance with Exhibit A: personnel, equipment, project management, administration, inspection, and design, permitting, planning, engineering, and/or surveying costs. The DISTRICT shall have the right to withhold any payment hereunder, either in whole or part, for non-compliance with the terms of this Agreement. 8. FINAL REIMBURSEMENT - The PROJECT SPONSOR, upon completion of the PROJECT, shall submit to the DISTRICT a request for final reimbursement of the PROJECT AMOUNT less any prior installment payments. The Payment amounts previously retained by the DISTRICT shall be paid upon (1) receipt of N] the Final Audit report of expenses incurred on the PROJECT by the DISTRICT, (2) full completion of the PROJECT to the reasonable satisfaction of the DISTRICT, (3) submission of Project Completion Certification Form No. 90-23 (Exhibit E), and (4) submission of a photograph of the PROJECT showing the sign required by Paragraph 17. Unless otherwise determined by the DISTRICT, the final reimbursement check shall be presented by a DISTRICT representative to the PROJECT SPONSOR during a public commission meeting or public dedication ceremony for the PROJECT facility. 9. RECORDS RETENTION - The PROJECT SPONSOR shall retain all records supporting the PROJECT COSTS for three (3) years after the end of the fiscal year in which the Final Payment is released by the DISTRICT, except that such records shall be retained by the PROJECT SPONSOR until final resolution of matters resulting from any litigation, claim, or special audit that starts prior to the expiration of the three- year retention period. 10. NONCOMPLIANCE - The DISTRICT shall have the right to reimbursement, either in whole or part as it may determine, of the funds provided hereunder for noncompliance by the PROJECT SPONSOR with any of the terms of this Project Agreement. Upon notification from the DISTRICT, the PROJECT SPONSOR shall reimburse such funds directly to the DISTRICT. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive completion of the PROJECT. 11. DISTRICT PROJECT MANAGER - The Executive Director, or his designee, is hereby designated as the DISTRICT's Project Manager for the purpose of this Project Agreement and shall be responsible for monitoring performance of its terms and conditions and for approving all reimbursement requests prior to payment. 12. SPONSOR'S LIAISON AGENT - The PROJECT SPONSOR shall appoint a LIAISON AGENT, whose name and title shall be submitted to the DISTRICT upon execution of the Project Agreement, to act on behalf of the PROJECT SPONSOR relative to the provisions of the Project Agreement. 4 13. STATUS REPORTS - The PROJECT SPONSOR'S LIAISON AGENT shall submit to the DISTRICT project status reports during the PROJECT term. These Quarterly Reports are to be on Form 495-02 (Exhibit F). Project design drawings, engineering drawings, and a copy of the Project bid award construction item cost list will be submitted as available. Photographs shall be submitted when appropriate to reflect the work accomplished. NON-COMPLIANCE by the PROJECT SPONSOR with the reporting schedule in Exhibit G may result in revocation of this Agreement. 14. LAWS - The PROJECT SPONSOR agrees to obtain and to abide by all federal, state and local permits and all applicable laws and regulations in the development of the PROJECT. The PROJECT SPONSOR agrees that all PROJECT facilities shall be designed and constructed in compliance with state and federal statutory requirements for accessibility by handicapped persons as well as all other federal, state and local laws, rules and requirements. i 15. 'NON-DISCRIMINATION - The PROJECT SPONSOR agrees that when completed, the PROJECT shall be readily accessible, on a non-exclusive basis, to the general public without regard to age, sex, race, physical handicap, or other condition, and without regard to residency of the user in another political subdivision. When such is required, adequate parking shall be made available by the PROJECT SPONSOR to accommodate vehicles for the number of persons for which the PROJECT is being developed. 16. SITE DEDICATION - The PROJECT SPONSOR also agrees that the PROJECT site shall be dedicated for the public use for a minimum period of twenty-five (25) years after completion of the PROJECT, such dedication to be in the form of a deed, lease, management agreement or other legally binding document. Any change in such dedication shall require the prior approval of the DISTRICT. The PROJECT SPONSOR shall record evidence of such dedication within the Public Records of the County in which the PROJECT is located. 5 lft.. *4W 17. ACKNOWLEDGMENT - The PROJECT SPONSOR shall erect a permanent sign, approved by the DISTRICT, in a prominent location at the completed project which shall indicate that the DISTRICT contributed funds for the PROJECT. The wording of the sign required by this paragraph shall be approved by the DISTRICT's staff before construction and installation of said sign. This sign shall contain the DISTRICT logo (Exhibit H) unless otherwise stipulated by the DISTRICT. In the event that the SPONSOR erects a temporary construction sign, it shall also indicate the DISTRICT's participation. 18. PROJECT MAINTENANCE - When and where applicable, the PROJECT SPONSOR agrees to operate, maintain, and manage the PROJECT for the life of the PROJECT improvements and will pay all expenses required for such purposes. The PROJECT improvements shall be maintained in accordance with the standards of maintenance for other local facilities and in accordance with applicable health standards. PROJECT facilities and improvements shall be kept reasonably safe and in reasonable repair to prevent undue deterioration and to encourage public use. The PROJECT SPONSOR warrants and represents that it has full legal authority and financial ability to operate and maintain said PROJECT facilities and improvements. 19. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY - Each party hereto agrees that it shall be solely responsible for the wrongful acts of its employees, contractors and agents. However, nothing contained herein shall constitute a waiver by either party of its sovereign immunity under Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. The PROJECT SPONSOR acknowledges that the DISTRICT, its employees, commissioners and agents are solely providing funding assistance for the PROJECT and are not involved in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of the PROJECT. 20. INSPECTIONS - The DISTRICT reserves the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect said PROJECT and any and all records related thereto at any time. M %W 1"W 21. RIGHTS AND DUTIES - The rights and duties arising under this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, and shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, survive completion of the PROJECT. The PROJECT SPONSOR may not assign this Agreement nor any interest hereunder without the express prior written consent of the DISTRICT. 22. WAIVERS - Waiver of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall i not be deemed a waiver of any other breach of the same or different provision. 23. NOTICE - Any notice required to be given pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be in writing, postage paid, and shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the DISTRICT or PROJECT SPONSOR at the addresses below. The notice shall be effective on the date indicated on the return receipt. To the DISTRICT at: Florida Inland Navigation District 1314 Marcinski Road Jupiter, Florida 33477-9498 To PROJECT SPONSOR at: St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Attention: Director - St. Lucie County Leisure Services 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 24. NO JOINT VENTURE - The DISTRICT's role with respect to the PROJECT is that of a funding assistance authority only and the DISTRICT is not, and shall not be considered to be, an agent, partner, or joint venturer with the PROJECT SPONSOR. 7 en 25. GOVERNING LAW - The validity, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled and construed according to the laws of the State of Florida. 26. TRANSFERENCE - It is the intent of the DISTRICT to issue this funding assistance to the PROJECT SPONSOR who has made application for this assistance. In the event the PROJECT SPONSOR transfers ownership or management of the PROJECT to a party or parties not now a part of this document, other than another governmental entity that agrees to assume, in writing, PROJECTS SPONSOR'S obligation hereunder, the DISTRICT retains the right to full reimbursement from the PROJECT SPONSOR to the full extent of the funding assistance provided by the DISTRICT, including but not limited to any costs and reasonable attorney's fees (regardless of whether litigation ensues) incurred by the DISTRICT in collecting said reimbursement. 27. ENTIRE UNDERSTANDING - This Agreement, including any exhibits made a part hereof, embodies the entire Agreement and understanding of the parties and supersedes all prior oral and written communications between them. The terms hereof may be modified only by a written amendment signed by both parties hereto. 28. LITIGATION COSTSNENUE - In the event that the DISTRICT or the PROJECT SPONSOR institutes any action or suit to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable costs and attorney's fees at the trial, appellate and post judgment levels. The venue of any such litigation shall be had only in Palm Beach County, Florida. [This space intentionally left blank] IR&O IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed the day, month and year aforesaid. WI S S: WITNESSES: FLORIDA LAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT By: (-Z,� �-j CHAIR DATE: DATE: C%�0U J ATTESTED By-1-6)/Z k� 4 0 ..i EXHIBIT A CHAPTER 6613-2 — WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 6613-2.001 Purpose. 6613-2.002 Forms. 6613-2.003 Definitions. 6613-2.004 Policy. 66B-2.005 Funds Allocation. 6613-2.006 Application Process. 6613-2.0061 Emergency Applications. 66B-2.007 Application Form. 66B-2.008 Project Eligibility. 6613-2.009 Project Administration. 6613-2.010 Project Agreement. 6613-2.011 Reimbursement. 6613-2.012 Accountability. 6613-2.013 Acknowledgement. 66B-2.001— Purpose. Recognizing the importance and benefits of inland navigation channels and waterways, as well as noting problems associated with the construction, continued maintenance and use of these waterways, the Florida Legislature created s. 374.976, Florida Statutes. This law authorizes and empowers each inland navigation district to undertake programs intended to alleviate the problems associated with its waterways. The purpose of this rule is to set forth the District's policy and procedures for the implementation of an assistance program under s. 374.976, F.S., for local governments, member counties and navigation related districts within the District. This program will be known hereafter as the Florida Inland Navigation District's Waterways Assistance Program. r 1 1 E ` ,V 1400 Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(I) FS. History — New 12-17.90, Formerly 16T-2.001. 66B-2.002 — Forms. All forms for the administration of this program are available from the District office located at 1314 Marcinski Road, Jupiter, Florida 33477. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(I) FS. History —New I2-17-90, Formerly 16T-2.002. 6613-2.003 — Definitions. The basic terms utilized in this rule are defined as follows: (1) "APPLICANT" means an eligible governmental agency submitting an application through this program. (2) "APPLICATION" means a project proposal with the required documentation. (3) "AUTHORIZED SUBMISSION PERIOD" means the established period for 1 submitting'applications to the District. (4) 'BEACH RENOURISHMENT" means the placement of sand on a beach for 1 the nourishment, renourishment or restoration of a beach. 1 (5) 'BOARD" means the Board of Commissioners of the Florida Inland Navigation District. (6) "DISTRICT" means the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND). (7) "ELIGIBLE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY' means member counties, local governments and navigation related districts within the taxing boundaries of the District. (8) "EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR" means the Executive Director of the Florida Inland Navigation District. (9) "LIAISON AGENT' means the contact person officially designated to act on behalf of the applicant or the project sponsor. (10) "LOCAL GOVERNMENTS" means municipalities, cities, or consolidated county governments, which are located within the member counties. 2 (11) "MATCHING FUNDS" means those funds provided by the local sponsor to the project. (12) "MEMBER COUNTY" means a county located within the taxing boundaries of the District which includes Duval, St. Johns, Flagler, Volusia, Brevard, Indian River, St. Lucie, Martin, Palm Beach, Broward and Dade Counties. (13) "NAVIGATION RELATED DISTRICTS" means port authorities, inlet districts or any other agency having legally authorized navigation related duties in waterways of the District. (14) "PRE -AGREEMENT COSTS" means project costs approved by the District Board which have occurred prior to the execution of the project agreement. (15) "PROGRAM" means the Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program. (16) "PROGRAM FUNDS" means financial assistance awarded by the Board to a project for release to the project sponsor pursuant to the terms of the project agreement. (17) "PROJECT" means a planned undertaking consisting of eligible program facilities, improvements or expenses for the use and benefit of the general public. (18) "PROJECT AGREEMENT" means an executed contract between the District and a project sponsor setting forth mutual obligations regarding an approved project. (19) "PROJECT MANAGER" means the District employee who is responsible for monitoring the performance of the Project and compliance with the project agreement. (20) "PROJECT PERIOD" means the approved time during which costs may be incurred and charged to the funded project. (21) "PROJECT SPONSOR" means an eligible governmental agency receiving program funds pursuant to an approved application. (22) "PUBLIC MARINA" means a harbor complex used primarily for recreational boat mooring or storage, the services of which are open to the general public on a 3 '41✓ .,.r+ first come, first served basis without any qualifying requirements such as club membership, stock ownership, or differential in price. (23) "TRIM HEARING" means a public hearing required by Chapter 200, F.S., concerning the tax and budget of the District. (24) "WATERWAYS" means the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, all navigable rivers, bays, creeks or lagoons intersected by said waterway and all navigable natural creeks, rivers, bays or lagoons entering or extending from said waterway. (25) "WATERWAY RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION" means an interdisciplinary holistic process by which the learner develops an awareness of the natural and manmade environments of waterways; develops knowledge about how the environment of the waterways works; acquires knowledge about the technological, social, cultural, political, and economic relationships occurring in waterway related environmental issues; and, becomes motivated to apply action strategies to maintain balance between quality of life and quality of the environment of waterways. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(I) FS. History — New 12-17-90, Amended 9.2-92, 2-6-97, Formerly 16T-2.003, Amended 5-17-98. 66B-2.004 — Policy. The following constitutes the policy of the District regarding the administration of the program: (1) Financial assistance, support and cooperation may be provided to eligible governmental agencies for approved projects as follows: (a) Member counties may be provided financial assistance, support or cooperation in planning, acquisition, development, construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement, operation or the maintenance of public navigation, public recreation, inlet management, environmental education, law enforcement and boating safety projects directly related to the waterways. Member counties 4 *.MOO may also be provided financial assistance, support, and cooperation in planning and carrying out beach renourishment and inlet management projects. (b) Eligible local governments may also be provided financial assistance, support and cooperation in planning and carrying out public navigation, public recreation, inlet management, environmental education, law enforcement and boating safety projects directly related to the waterways. Eligible local governments may also be provided financial assistance, support and cooperation in planning and carrying out beach renourishment and inlet management prof ects. (c) Navigation related districts may be provided with financial assistance to pay part of the costs of the planning and acquisition of dredge material management sites if the Board finds that the site is required for the long-range maintenance of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway channel. All such sites must meet the development and operational criteria established by the District through a long- range dredge material management plan for that county. Navigation related districts may also be provided with assistance for environmental mitigation projects associated with waterway improvement related activities and inlet management projects if the Board finds that the project benefits public navigation in the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. All navigation related districts shall contribute at least equal matching funds to any District financial assistance provided. Seaports may also be furnished assistance and support in planning and carrying out environmental mitigation projects. All seaport projects shall benefit publicly maintained channels and harbors. Each seaport shall contribute matching funds for funded projects. (2) The District will notify by direct mail and/or advertised public notice all eligible governmental agencies of the program and the upcoming authorized submission period. Funding allocations to navigation related districts, member counties and local governments shall be based upon the proportional share of the District's ad valorem tax collections from each county. 5 ORM OWA (3) Approval of projects by the District shall be in accordance with these rules. (4) The District and the project sponsor shall enter into a project agreement prior to the release of program funds. (5) The project sponsor shall clearly identify and enumerate the amount and source of the matching funds it will be using to match the program funds supplied by the District for an approved project. The project sponsor shall provide suitable evidence that it has the matching funds available at the time the project agreement is executed. (6) The District shall release program funds in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the project agreement. This release of program funds shall be on a reimbursement only basis. (7) The site of a proposed land -based development project shall be dedicated for the public use for which the project was intended for a minimum period of 25 years after project completion. Such dedication shall be in the form of a deed, lease, management agreement or other legally binding document and shall be recorded in the public property records of the county in which the property is located. This property control requirement also applies to a project site owned by another governmental entity. The governmental entity that owns the project site may be joined as a co -applicant to meet this property control requirement. (8) Facilities funded in whole or in part by program funds shall be made available to the general public of all of the member counties on a non-exclusive basis without regard to race, color, religion, age, sex or similar condition. (9) The project sponsor shall not commence work on an approved project prior to the execution of the project agreement unless authorized by the Board during the review and funding approval process. Pre -agreement expenses will be authorized if they are less than fifty (50) percent of the project's total cost and if the expenses are eligible project expenses in accordance with this rule. (10) The project shall be completed within three (3) years of the date beginning of the District's first fiscal year for which the project was approved. If the completion M r.. ..r of a project is impacted by a declared state of emergency and the Board waives this rule section, the extension of time granted shall not exceed one additional three (3) year period. (11) Project funds shall not be spent except as consistent with the project agreement cost estimate that was approved by the Board, which shall be an attachment to the project agreement. This cost estimate will establish the maximum funding assistance provided by the District and the percentage of funding provided by each party to the project. The District will pay the lesser of (1) the percentage total of project funding which the Board has agreed to fund, or (2) the maximum application funding assistance amount. (12) All project costs must be incurred and work performed within the project period as stipulated in the project agreement unless pre -agreement costs are approved by the Board. Pre -agreement expenses will be authorized if they are less than fifty (50) percent of the project's total cost and if the expenses are eligible project expenses in accordance with this rule. (13) The project sponsor is responsible for obtaining and abiding by any and all federal, state and local permits and regulations in the development of the project. (14) All development projects must be designed so as not to impact navigation along the District's waterways through the placement of structures, attendant uses, or the necessity of a boating speed zone for safety purposes. Before applying for boating speed zone designation in District waterways because of a project funded by this program, the sponsor shall first receive approval from the Board. The Board will use the criteria found in s. 327.46(1), F.S., in determining whether to approve the proposed boating speed zone. (15) The project sponsor shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance, and management of the project for the anticipated life of the project and shall be responsible for all expenses required for such purposes. The project shall be maintained in accordance with the standards of maintenance for other similar local facilities and in accordance with applicable health standards. Project facilities and E improvements shall be kept reasonably safe and in reasonable repair to prevent undue deterioration and to encourage public use. The project sponsor shall have full legal authority and financial ability to operate and maintain the project facilities. (16) The District shall terminate a project agreement and demand return of program funds disbursed to the project sponsor for non-compliance with any of the terms of the project agreement or this rule. Failure of a project sponsor to comply with the provisions of this rule or the project agreement shall result in the District declaring the project sponsor ineligible for further participation in the program until such time as compliance has been met to the satisfaction of the District. (17) All public marina projects funded through this program shall include sewage pumpout facilities for vessels, unless the applicant can demonstrate that inclusion of such a facility is physically, operationally or economically impracticable. (18) Public information produced with assistance from this program shall not be copyrighted and shall be provided free of cost, except for the cost of reproduction, to the publilc. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1), (2) FS. History — New 12-17-90, Amended 2-3-94, 2-6-97, Formerly 16T-2.004, Amended 5-18-98, 3-31-99. 6613-2.005 — Funds Allocation. The Board will allocate funding for this program based upon the District's overall goals, management policies, fiscal responsibilities and operational needs for the upcoming year. If funds are determined to be available for the program, the District will notify potential eligible governmental agencies of the availability of program funding. Applications will be reviewed by the Board utilizing District Forms No. 91-25 Waterways Assistance Program Application Evaluation and Rating Form, and 91-25A Waterways Assistance Program Navigation Districts Application Evaluation and Rating Form, (effective date 2-6-97) hereby incorporated by reference and available from the District office. 8 LJ .woe (1) In as much as the District has other fiscal responsibilities and operational needs, financial assistance to eligible government agencies shall not exceed an amount equal to eighty (80) per cent of the proportional share of the District's ad valorem tax collections from each county in which such agencies are located. The District may make an exception to this funding limitation, if funds are determined to be available based upon the District's overall goals, management policies, fiscal responsibilities and operational needs, in counties that are recovering from a state of emergency declared under Chapter 252, Florida Statutes. (2) Financial assistance to seaports may exceed the proportional share of the District's ad valorem tax collections as set forth in Section 6613-2.005(1) from the county in which such seaport is located if the seaport can demonstrate that a regional benefit occurs from the ports activities. Financial assistance to a seaport project that demonstrates a regional benefit shall not exceed an amount equal to (i) the proportional share of the District's ad valorem tax collections as set forth in Section 6613-2.005(1) from the counties where the benefit is demonstrated less (ii) funding allocated in the same fiscal year to all other local government projects funded in those counties. (3) All financial assistance and support to eligible governmental agencies shall require equal matching funds from the project sponsor with the exception of public navigation, law enforcement and environmental education projects. Project sponsors of public navigation projects shall provide matching funds of at least ten (10) per cent of the total cost of the project. Project sponsors of law enforcement and environmental education projects shall provide matching funds of at least twenty-five (25) per cent of the total cost of the project. All financial assistance to seaports shall require equal matching funds. (4) Projects and project elements in the categories of inlet management and beach renourishment shall be subject to the following provisions. The District shall contribute no more than fifty per cent of the local share of the cost of the project. The District shall not contribute funding to both the state and local shares of an 6 %aw ., inlet management or beach renourishment project. Funding for the construction phase of an inlet management or beach renourishment project may be approved by the District Board for a multiple year period subject to budgeting and allocation pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 200, F.S. Additionally, the following provisions shall be met for inlet management or beach renourishment projects: (a) Inlet Management 1. Inlet management projects shall benefit public navigation within the District and shall be consistent with Department of Environmental Protection approved inlet management plans and the statewide beach management plan pursuant to s. 161.161, F.S. Inlet management projects that are determined to be consistent with Department of Environmental Protection approved inlet management plans are declared to be a benefit to public navigation. (b) Beach Renourishment 1. All projects in this category shall be consistent with the statewide beach management plan. Beach renourishment projects shall only include those beaches that have been adversely impacted by navigation inlets, navigation structures, navigation dredging, or a navigation project. The determination of beach areas that are adversely impacted by navigation for the purposes of this program shall be made by Department of Environmental Protection approved inlet management plans. If state funding is not provided for a beach project, public access with adequate parking must be available in accordance with s. 161, F.S. (5) Eligible projects or project elements in the categories of public navigation, law enforcement and environmental education include: (a) Public navigation 1. Navigation channel dredging 2. Navigation channel lighting and markers 3. Waterway signs and buoys for safety, regulation or information (b) Law enforcement 1. Waterways boating safety programs Ito] 2. Law enforcement and boating safety equipment (c) Waterways Related Environmental Education 1. Environmental Education Programs Waterways related environmental educational programs shall consist of coordinated efforts among the local community, the local school district and local governments. Eligible programs shall be available to the general public or a targeted segment of the general public. The curriculum for an eligible program shall be coordinated with the District, the local community, the local school district and local governments and shall be directly related to the environment of the waterways. t 2. Environmental Education Facilities Eligible environmental educational facilities shall include buildings used for waterways related education and accessory facilities such as boardwalks, docks, signs, pavilions and other such structures that are directly utilized for education. Structures having environmental education signage but not adjacent to or associated with an environmental education facility shall not be considered a i waterways related environmental education facility for the purposes of this rule section. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1), (3) FS. History — New 12-17-90, Amended 6-24-93, 9-5-96, 2-6-97, Formerly 16T-2.005, Amended 5-17-98. 66B-2.006 —Application Process. (1) Applications for assistance through this program shall be submitted during the authorized submission period, which is from March 1st through May 1st of each year, unless modified by vote of the Board at a scheduled meeting. The project sponsor shall approve the submission of an application by official resolution from its governing board or commission. Said resolution shall be made on FIND Resolution Form No. 90-21 (effective date 12-17-90) hereby incorporated by E i%we NOW reference and available from the District office located at 1314 Marcinski Road, Jupiter, FL 33477. (2) Applications will be reviewed by the local FIND Commissioner before being submitted to the District Office. Upon receipt in the District office, staff will review the applications for completeness of the informational requirements identified in the Application Checklist, FIND Form Number 90-26 (effective date 4-12-95) and for compliance with the eligibility requirements of this rule. If the application is for a project that is a land based development project the applicant shall submit an Attorney's Certification of Title, FIND Form Number 94-26 (effective date 4-12-95). When an application is determined by staff to be i incomplete or ineligible, staff will immediately inform the applicant by mail. The applicant will then have until the date established by the Board in the application package to bring the application into compliance. If the applicant fails to provide a 1 complete application in compliance with these rules, the application will not be considered for funding. (3) Applications determined to be complete and in compliance with this rule will be forwarded to the Board for review and then scheduled for presentation to the Board at a scheduled meeting of the Board. The applicant's presentation will at a minimum include a discussion of the applicant's answers to the Evaluation and Rating Criteria on Form No. 91-25. Following the presentations, the Board will review the applications and evaluate them using the Project Evaluation and Rating Form No. 91-25 (effective date 4-12-95) hereby incorporated by reference and available from the District office. (4) The total points awarded to each application by the Commissioners will be averaged to determine an applications final rating score. The final rating score for each application must equal or exceed 35 points for the application to be considered for funding assistance. Reconsideration of any application with a final rating score of less than 35 points will only occur if the majority of the Commissioners evaluating the project rated the project equal to or exceeding 35 12 "%W .r+ points and two-thirds of the Commissioners vote for reconsideration of the application. (5) The Board will hold a funding allocation meeting at which time the Board will determine the allocation of funds, if any, to each project. Allocations will be based in part upon the cumulative score of the applications as calculated from the Project Evaluation and Rating Form. Allocations will also be based upon the specific needs of the individual counties. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History — New 12-17-90, Amended 9-2-92, 6-24-93, 4-12-95, Formerly 16T-2.006. 66B-2.0061— Emergency Applications. Emergency applications may be submitted to the District and considered by the Board at any time during the year to provide assistance to an eligible applicant for the removal of navigation obstructions and repair or replacement of waterway facilities damaged by a declared natural disaster. The District shall consider these applications in accordance with these rules. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History — New 6-24-93, Amended I 2-6-97, Formerly 16T-2.0061. 6613-2.007 — Application Form. Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program Application Form Number FIND 90-22 (effective date 4-12-95) and 93-22A (effective date 4- 12-95) are hereby incorporated by reference and available from the District office. All applications for financial assistance and support through this program from member counties and local governments shall be made on Form Number FIND 90-22. All applications for financial assistance and support through this program from navigation related districts shall be made on Form Number FIND 93-22A. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History — New 12-17-90, Amended 6-24-93, 2-3-94, 4-12-95, Formerly 16T-2.007. 13 `W 6613-2.008 — Project Eligibility. (1) Financial assistance and support through this program shall be used to plan or carry out public navigation, public recreation, environmental education, boating safety, spoil site acquisition directly related to the waterways, inlet management, environmental mitigation and beach renourishment. (a) Program funds may be used for projects such as acquisition, planning, development, construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement, operation or maintenance of the following types of projects for public use on land and water. These project types will be arranged into a priority list each year by vote of the Board. The priority list will be distributed to applicants with the project application. 1. Public navigation channel dredging 2. Public navigation aids and markers 3. Public boat ramps and launching facilities 4. Public boat docking and mooring facilities 5. Public shoreline stabilization 1 6. Inlet management projects that are a benefit to public navigation in the District 7. Waterway signs and buoys for safety, regulation or information 8. Public spoil disposal site development 9. Waterways related environmental education programs and facilities 10. Public fishing and viewing piers 11. Public waterfront boardwalks 12. Waterways boating safety programs and equipment 13. Beach renourishment on beaches adversely impacted by navigation inlets, navigation structures, navigation dredging, or a navigation project 14. Other waterway related projects. 14 ../ (b) Project costs ineligible for program funding or matching funds will include: contingencies, miscellaneous, reoccurring personnel related costs, land acquisition and any extraneous recreational amenities not directly related to the waterway such as the following: 1. Landscaping 2. Park and playground equipment 3. Restrooms for non -waterway users 4. Tennis courts 5. Roadways providing access to non -waterway users 6. Parking areas for non -waterway users 7. Utilities for non -waterway related facilities 8. Lighting for non -waterway related facilities 9. Irrigation equipment 10. Maintenance equipment 11. Picnic shelters and furniture. 12. Vehicles to transport vessels. (c) Subject to approval by the Board of an itemized expense list: 1. The following project costs will eligible for program funding or as matching funding: a. Project management, administration and inspection; b. Design, permitting, planning, engineering or surveying costs for completed construction project; c. Restoration of sites disturbed during the construction of an approved project; d. Equipment costs. 2. The following project costs will be eligible only as matching costs and can not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the applicants match: a. Applicant's non -recurring personnel costs; b. Applicant's equipment costs; c. Applicant's in-house project management administration and inspection costs; 15 d. Applicant's in-house design, permitting, planning, engineering or surveying costs for completed construction project; e. Applicant's other in -kind services. Before reimbursement is made by the District on any of the costs listed in subsection 1. or 2. above, a construction contract for the project, approved and executed by the project sponsor and project contractor, must be submitted to the r District. (d) Applications for eligible waterway projects which include construction elements below mean high water will be submitted as a phased project where Phase I will include the design, engineering and permitting elements and Phase II will include the construction of the project. A description and cost estimate of the Phase II work will be submitted along with the Phase I application for Board review. Applicants for Phase II funding will demonstrate that the environmental permitting element of Phase I will be completed prior to the tentative approval date of funding for Phase II. Should the environmental permitting element of Phase I of an application for a construction project not be completed by the I District's meeting where tentative funding decisions for this program will be made, the Phase II project will not be considered for funding. An applicant may file a petition pursuant to the rule waiver procedures of s. 120.542, F.S., and Chapter 28- 104, F.A.C., to extend the date for receipt -of the required environmental permits. Petitions filed pursuant to this rule section should be submitted to the District no later than July 1st to facilitate the orderly process of this program and the preparation of the District's fiscal year budget in which the assistance funds will be included. The District will not deviate from the funding schedule, whereby funding decisions are completed at the final TRIM hearing, to accommodate any applicant filing a petition after that date. (2) The Board will make all final decisions on the eligibility of a Project or specific project costs. IV I L, ./ Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) — (3) FS. History — New 12-17-90, Amended 9.2-92, 6-24-93, 2-3-94, 4-12-95, 9-5-96, 2-6-97, Formerly 16T-2.008, Amended 5-17-98, 3-31- 99. 66B-2.009 — Project Administration. The District will administer all funded projects through an executed project agreement. The District will appoint a project manager who shall be responsible for monitoring project and the project agreement. The project manager shall also be responsible for approving all reimbursement requests. The project sponsor shall appoint a liaison agent to act on its behalf in carrying out the terms of the project agreement. Administration of the project will be as follows: (1) A project agreement will be executed between the District and the project sponsor. (2) The liaison agent will submit quarterly reports to the project manager summarizing the work accomplished since the last report, problems encountered, percentage of project completion and other appropriate information. These reports shall continue throughout the length of the project period until completion of the project. (3) The liaison agent may submit periodic reimbursement requests during the project period. The project manager will approve or disapprove all reimbursement requests. The final payment of program funds will be made upon certified completion of the project by the District. (4) Upon reasonable request, the project manager shall have the right to inspect the project and any and all records relating to the project. (5) Upon completion of the project, the liaison agent shall provide the following to the project manager: (a) A Project Completion Certificate, FIND Form No. 90-23 (effective date 12- 17-90) hereby incorporated by reference and available from the District office, 17 v ..r which certifies that the project was completed in accordance with the project agreement and the final project plans. (b) A final reimbursement request accompanied by all required billing statements and vouchers. (c) Photograph(s) showing the installation of the sign required by s. 66B-2.013. (d) Photograph(s) of the completed project clearly showing the program improvements. (6) The project manager will review the project completion package and will authorize or reject the final reimbursement payment, which will include all retained funds from previous requests. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(l) FS. History — New 12-17-90, Formerly 16T-2.009. 66B-2.010 — Project Agreement. (1) For each funded project, the District and the project sponsor will enter into a project agreement setting forth the mutual obligations of the parties concerning the project. The project agreement shall incorporate the applicable policies and procedures of the program as outlined in this rule. Project agreements will be for a two-year period with the possibility for one, one-year extension. (2) All proposed changes to the project agreement must be submitted to the District in writing by the project sponsor accompanied by a statement of justification for the proposed changes. Agreed changes shall be evidenced by a formal amendment to the project agreement and shall be in compliance with these rules. (3) All project agreement amendments shall be approved by the District board except that the executive director may approve a minor project agreement amendment for a project within a county with the local District commissioner's concurrence. A minor project amendment shall not change the approved project's is 14� category nor result in a reallocation of more than 35% of the approved funding of the project among project elements. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History —New 12-17-90, Amended 9-5-96, Formerly 16T-2.010. 66B-2.011— Reimbursement. The District shall reimburse the project sponsor for project costs expended on the project in accordance with the project agreement. Project funds to be reimbursed will require the submission of a Reimbursement Request Form and required supporting documents, FIND Form No. 90-24 (effective date 6-24-93) hereby incorporated by reference and available from the District office. (1) All project costs shall be reported to the District and summarized on the Reimbursement Request Form. All requests for reimbursement shall include 1 supporting documentation such as billing statements for work performed and cancelled payment vouchers for expenditures made. (2) The District shall retain ten per cent of all reimbursement payments until final 1 certification of completion of the project. The District shall withhold any reimbursement payment, either in whole or part, for non-compliance with the terms of this agreement. (3) The final reimbursement check shall be presented by a District representative to the project sponsor during a public commission meeting or public dedication ceremony for the project facility. (4) In accordance with these rules, reimbursement can not be made on a Phase I application until a construction contract is executed by the applicant for the construction phase of the project. If the Phase I project is completed but a construction contract is not executed by the three (3) year project deadline, then the District shall only allow one (1) year from the Phase I project deadline to enter into the required construction contract before the Phase I funding is cancelled. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History — New 12-17-90, Amended 6-24-93, Formerly 16T-2.011, Amended 3-31-99. M v .� 6613-2.012 — Accountability. The following procedures shall govern the accountability of program funds: (1) Each project sponsor is responsible for maintaining an accounting system that meets generally accepted accounting principles and for maintaining such financial records as necessary to properly account for all program funds. (2) The project sponsor shall submit quarterly project status reports to FIND during the project period. These reports will summarize the work accomplished since the previous report, problems encountered, percentage of project completion and any other appropriate information. (3) All required final completion certification documents and materials as outlined in s. 66B-2.009(5) of this rule shall be submitted to the District prior to final reimbursement of program funds. (4) All project records including project costs shall be available for review by the District or by an auditor selected by the District for 3 years after completion of the project. Any such audit expenses incurred shall be bome entirely by the project sponsor. (5) The project sponsor shall retain all records supporting project costs for three years after either the completion of the project or the final reimbursement payment, whichever is later, except that should any litigation, claim, or special audit arise before the expiration of the three year period, the project sponsor shall retain all records until the final resolution of such matters. (6) If it is found by any State, County, FIND, or independent audit that program funds have not been used in accordance with this rule and applicable laws, the project sponsor shall repay the misused program funds to the District. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History — New 12-17-90, Formerly 16T-2.012. `. ..v 6613-2.013 — Acknowledgement. The project sponsor shall erect a permanent sign, approved by the District, in a prominent location at the completed project, which indicates the District's participation in the project. This sign shall contain the FIND logo. In the event that the project sponsor erects a temporary construction sign, this sign shall also recognize the District's participation. If the final product of the project is a report, study or other publication, the District's sponsorship of that publication shall be prominently indicated at the beginning of the publication. If the project results in an educational display, the District's logo and a statement of the District's participation in the project shall be contained in the display. Specific Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History — New 12-17-90, Formerly 16T-2.013. 21 .00 EXHIBIT B Revision # 2 09/27/00� FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE 1PROGRAM NAVIGATION RELATED DISTRICTS PROJECT COST ESTDIATE PROJECT TITLE: Ft. Pierce Inlet Boat Lau.ach Area APPLICANT: St. Lucie County Board cf County Commissioners Project Elements Quantity Estimatcd Applicant's FIND (Number and/or Cost Cost Cost Footage) Phase I: FDOT Turn Lane 95,491.00 54,891.00 409600.00 Upland Park 422,886.00 211,486.00 41h4GUO 3 Restroom Parks Landscaping Utilities Phase II: Docks/Ramps 357,523.00 357,523.00 0.00 Totals 875,900.00 623,900.00 252.000 00•- Form No. 90-25 (New 10114192) %MW EXHIBIT C FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Matching Funds Certification Sponsor: St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Project Title: Ft. Pierce Boat Launch Project #: SL-00-29 I hereby certify that the above referenced project Sponsor, as of October 01, 2000, has the required matching funds for the accomplishment of the referenced project in accordance with the Waterways Assistance ProgramProject Agreement between the Florida Inland Navigation District and the Sponsor, dated October 2000. Project Liaison Name: Don McLam, Project Project Liaison Signature: Date: November 7, 2000 to at "filly Rn ri —_:ccineo sa Itlenlnetion an end dm i:! tar. m cells o eraonally Kn wat,., ma, o' / _ e: oduesd Iden Pflcatloz Y V UBLIL SF-A.c e! ,of Flo, =..)"o.n nih• FIND Form No. 95-01 New 9/9/95 Leisure Services NOTARY SEAL ZOOZ'Bt tpaeyy s:.-:- OOLS 2OC) 16!ss, o , 8 epu , r i linCa s drown drown *My Commission CCi2c7.-'u %d Expires Marcn 18. 2002 EXHIBIT D FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PAYMENT REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST FORM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT SPONSOR: Amount of Assistance Funds Previously Requested Balance Available Funds Requested Less Retainage (10%) Check Amount Balance Available Less Check Amount Balance Remaining Expense Description (Should correspond to Cost Estimate Sheet Categories in Exhibit "B") SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES Check No. Vendor Name and Date PROJECT NO.: BILLING NO.: Total Applicant FIND Cost Cost Cost 4 FIND - Form No. 90-24 Rev. 9/3/92 FIND - Form No. 90-24 Page Two Expense Description (Should correspond to Cost Estimate Sheet Categories in Exhibit "B") EXHIBIT D CONTINUED SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES Check No. Total Vendor Name and Date Cost Applicant FIND Cost Cost Certification for Reimbursement: I certify that the above expenses were necessary and reasonable for the accomplishment of the approved project and that these expenses are in accordance with Exhibit "B" of the Project Agreement. Project Liaison Date FIND - Form No. 90-24 Rev. 9/3/92 EXHIBIT E FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Project Completion Certification Sponsor: Project Title: Project #: I hereby certify that the above referenced project was computed im 2c=zct -` V= the Waterways Assistance Program Project Agreement between t1--e F-cr:,- Navigation District and , 20and that all funds were expended iy= t z Exhibit "B" and Paragraph 1 of the Project Agreement. Project Liaison N Project Liaison Signature: Date: NOTARY ---s,kT FIND Form No. 90-13 Rev. 9/3/92 On EXHIBIT F WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROJECT QUARTERLYSTATUSREPORT PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT SPONSOR: REPORT PERIOD Oct 1-DEC 15 Dec 15-Mar 1 Mar 1-June 15 June 15-Sep 1 Report Due: (Dec 31) (March 15) (June 31) (Sep P IS ) WORK ACCOMPLISHED: PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED: PERCENTAGE COMPLETION: OTHER NOTABLE ITEMS: Form No. 95-02 1%w EXHIBIT F ..0 WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROJECT QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT SPONSOR: REPORT PERIOD Oct 1-DEC 15_ Dec 15-Mar i_ Mar 1-June 15_ June 15-Sep I Report Due: (Dec 31) (March 15) (June 31) (Sep 15) WORK ACCOMPLISHED: PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED: PERCENTAGE COMPLETION: OTHER NOTABLE ITEMS: Form No. 95-02 ..+ EXHIBIT F WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROJECT QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT SPONSOR: lilrVI : "J C _ met Oct I -DEC 15_ Dec 15-Mar 1 Mar 1-June 15_ June 15-Sep 1 Report Due: (Dec 31) (March 15) (June 31) (Sep 15) WORK ACCOMPLISHED: PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED: PERCENTAGE COMPLETION: OTHER NOTABLE ITEMS: Form No. 95-02 Z•S EXHIBIT F m WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROJECT QUARTERLYSTATUSREPORT PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT SPONSOR: REPORT PERIOD Oct 1-DEC 15_ Dec 15-Mar 1 Mar 1-June 15_ June 15-Sep 1 �Reportl)ue: (Dec 31) (March 15) (June 31) (Sep 15) WORK ACCOMPLISHED: PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED: PERCENTAGE COMPLETION: OTHER NOTABLE ITEMS: Form No. 95-02 %W EXHIBIT G WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROJECT SCHEDULE OCTOBER 2000 - Project Agreement Executed, Project Initiates. DECEMBER 31, 2000 - First Quarterly Report Due. MARCH 15, 2001 - Second Quarterly Report Due. JUNE 30, 2001 - Third Quarterly Report Due. SEPTEMBER 15, 2001 - Fourth Quarterly Report Due. DECEMBER 29, 2001 - Fifth Quarterly Report Due. MARCH 15, 2002 - Sixth Quarterly Report Due. JUNE 299 2002 - Seventh Quarterly Report Due. NOTE: If project will not be completed and all close out paperwork submitted by September I" a request for an extension of the completion date of the project should be submitted with the quarterly report. SEPTEMBER 3, 2002 - Closeout paperwork due. September 28, 2002 - District finishes processing closeout paperwork, performs project inspection and submits final reimbursement check to sponsor. NOTE: Any modifications to the PROJECT shall require advance notice and prior written approval of the District. Appropriate timing for modifications to the project cost estimate, Exhibit C, would be after receipt of bids. *NON-COMPLIANCE by the PROJECT SPONSOR with the reporting schedule in Exhibit B may result in revocation of this agreement pursuant to Paragraph 11 of the project agreement. A NTjC IIM AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB ITEM NO. C-513 DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ CONSENT [X ] PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin SUBJECT: Briargate Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU) Budget BACKGROUND: The MSBU Coordinator has informed this office that the Briargate MSBU project has progressed to the point where construction can begin. This project has been selected as one that meets the criteria of the MSBU in- house loan program which means the Board will loan funds from the MSBU reserves to construct the project. The loan, plus 8% interest, will be repaid over the next ten years by special assessments levied on the property owners participating in the project. FUNDS AVAILABLE: See attached Budget Resolution No. 01-85 PREVIOUS ACTION: March 7, 2000 - The Board held a public hearing and approved Resolution 00-053 creating the Briargate MSBU and authorized the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the project. April 18, 2000 - The Board approved the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities authority and the City of Fort Pierce to provide potable water to the subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt Budget Resolution No. 01-85 establishing the budget for the Briargate MSBU project. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: 0/ -Z4-V*-L Doug Anderson County Administrator "V Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: XX Y Management & Budget: X { -Ai Purchasing: MSBU Coord: XX ! I- Public Works: XX Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX GABU DG ET W P\AGEN DA'S\ApndaO I \03'27Briuga[e.wpd % � 1%W RESOLUTION NO. 01-85 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available in the form of contributions from the property owners participating in the Briargate Municipal Services Benefit Unit. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 27" day of March, 2001, putsuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2000-2001, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 388-0000-384300-000 Proceeds - Contrib From Property Owners $34,104 APPROPRIATIONS 388-4115-534000-4515 Other Contractual Services $25,533 388-4115-563000-4515 Improvements O/T Buildings $2,500 388-4115-563008-4515 Imp O/T Bldgs-Advertising $250 388-4115-549114-4515 General & Administrative Fees $5,821 Total Appropriations $34,104 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson, Chairperson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward, Vice Chairperson XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX GABUDGE%WRAGENDA'SUgenda01103'Mriargate.wpd °✓ PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 27T" DAY OF MARCH, 2001. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY G:\BUDGMW MGBNDA'S\Agenda0 1\03'27Bnargate.wpd r.r 60 AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-5C DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ CONSENT [XI TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin SUBJECT: King's Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District Budget BACKGROUND: The MSBU Coordinator has informed this office that the Kings Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District project has progressed to the point where construction can begin. The cost of the project will be paid for by special assessments levied on the participants, however, funds from the assissments will not be received until fiscal year 2002. So as not to delay the project, the Public Works department has agreed to use $16,650 from the MSBU project reserves for the construction. This 'loan', plus interest, will be repaid by the participants when revenue from the assessments are received. This should be no later than April of the year 2002. FUNDS AVAILABLE: See attached Budget Resolution No. 01-84 PREVIOUS ACTION: January 9, 2001 - The Board held a public hearing and approved Resolution 00-287 creating the Kings Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District and approved the use of funds from the MSBU reserves to begin construction. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt Budget Resolution No. 01-84 establishing the budget for the Kings Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District project. COMMISSION ACTION: [XI APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: XX Management & Budget: Xx2p f7Purchasing: MSBU Coord: XX Public Works: XX Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX NIL `.. ..W RESOLUTION NO. 01-84 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available in the form of contributions from the property owners participating in the Kings Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 27' day of March, 2001, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2000-2001, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 128-0000-384300-000 Proceeds - Contrib From Property Owners $16,500 APPROPRIATIONS 128-4115-534000-49005 Other Contractual Services $10,175 128-4115-543020-49005 Utilities -Street Lights/Traffic Signals $6,325 Total Appropriations $16,500 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson, Chairperson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward, Vice Chairperson XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX 1 i PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 27T" DAY OF MARCH, 2001. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY a.. ..+ AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ITEM NO. C DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[XX] PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: Quit Claim Deeds Dixieland S/D-an unrecorded plat- Section 27-35-40 Unopened 60' right-of-way / Tax ID# 2427-801-0106-000/9 BACKGROUND: The abandonment was approved and adopted by Resolution No.01-49. The title insurance company for the petitioner has asked the County to convey this right-of-way by Quit Claim Deed because the right-of-way was originally conveyed to the County by Deed and not by Plat. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On December 19, 2000 the Board approved permission to advertise the Notice of Public Hearing. On January 23, 2001, the Board approved Resolution No. 01-49 abandoning the unopened 60' right- of-way of Dixieland S/D, an unrecorded plat in Section 27-35-40. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the Quit -Claim Deeds and return Deeds to petitioner for recording in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. COMMISSION ACTION: [g APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: XX County Attorney,: ^—r Y�--� XX originating Dept.: -f�— Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) CONCURRENCE: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals Public Works: County Engineer: Purchasing: Road & Bridge Eff. 5/96 15 This Instrument Prepared By, Record and Return to: Paula Budd PREMIER TITLE COMPANY, LTD. 151 Royal Palm Way Palm Beach, FL 33480 Agent File No.: 01-038 Parcel Identification Number: 2427-801-0106-00019 OUIT-CLAIMDEED THIS QUIT-CLAIMDEED, made this day of ,2001,between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, GRANTOR*, whose address is 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34982 , and N.S.S. Acquisition Corp. a Florida Corporation, whose address is 3350 S. US 1, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, GRANTEE*; WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00/100 ($10.00) DOLLARS, in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit -claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of ST. LUCIE, State of Florida, to -wit: The West 30 Feet of the following described property: A parcel of land having an East West dimension of 60 feet and a North South dimension of 320 feet, said parcel of land lying between Block 1 and Block 8 and bounded on the North by the South right of way line of Southland Drive and bounded on the South by the North right of way line of Dixieland Drive of an unrecorded plat of Dixieland Subdivision on the Southeast quarter of Section 27, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, as recorded in Deed Book 152, Page 403, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. r.. E5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above forever. Attest: ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Deputy Clerk, St. Lucie County By: (Official Seal) Approved as to form: 558484.2 ,Chairman ,County Attorney On This Instrument Prepared By, Record and Return to: Paula Budd PREMIER TITLE COMPANY, LTD. 151 Royal Pahn Way Palm Beach, FL 33480 Agent File No.: 01-038 Parcel Identification Number: 2427-801-0106-00019 OUIT-CLAIM DEED THISQUIT-CLAIMDEED,madethis dayof ,2001,between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, GRANTOR*, whose address is 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34982, and Virginia L. Jones, a single woman, whose address is 310 Dixieland Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 33450, and Edward L. Jones, a married man, whose address is 2 Treaty Point Way, Fountain Inn, South Carolina 29644 GRANTEE*; WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00/100 ($10.00) DOLLARS, in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit -claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of ST. LUCIE, State of Florida, to -wit: The Eastern 30 feet of the South 160 feet of the following described property situate in St. Lucie County, Florida: A parcel of land having an East West dimension of 60 feet and a North South dimension of 320 feet, said parcel of land lying between Block 1 and Block 8 and bounded on the North by the South right of way line of Southland Drive and bounded on the South by the North right of way line of Dixieland Drive of an unrecorded plat of Dixieland Subdivision on the Southeast quarter of Section 27, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, as recorded in Deed Book 152, Page 403, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. *kw. ♦10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above forever. Attest: ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA B O A R D O F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Deputy Clerk, St. Lucie County By: ,Chairman (Official Seal) Approved as to form: 558484.3 ,County Attorney M This Instrument Prepared By, Record and Return to: Paula Budd PREMIER TITLE COMPANY, LTD. 151 Royal Palm Way Palm Beach, FL 33480 Agent File No.: 01-038 Parcel identification Number: 2427-801-0106-00019 O uT-CLAIM DEED THIS QUIT-CLAIMDEED, made this day of , 2001, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, GRANTOR*, whose address is 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34982 , and Ralph S. Gersony and Cynthia Gersony, his wife, GRANTEE*, whose address is 4706 Seagrape Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34982, WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00/100 ($10.00) DOLLARS, in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit -claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of ST. LUCIE, State of Florida, to -wit: The Eastern 30 feet of the North 160 feet of the following described property situate in St. Lucie County, Florida: A parcel of land having an East West dimension of 60 feet and a North South dimension of 320 feet, said parcel of land lying between Block 1 and Block 8 and bounded on the North by the South right of way line of Southland Drive and bounded on the South by the North right of way line of Dixieland Drive of an unrecorded plat of Dixieland Subdivision on the Southeast quarter of Section 27, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, as recorded in Deed Book 152, Page 403, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. %Aw ..w IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above forever. Attest: ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Deputy Clerk, St. Lucie County By: ,Chairman (Official Seal) Approved as to form: 558484.5 ,County Attorney 121 Exhibit "B" A :2I k W O J 17IS SOUTHLAND 281.43 75 1po ,21 I 4 IL----J75 5 e 6 1 7 II (801-0001- L 000/3) 2 Z I I----� !8 1 4 1 16 I I ! I 1 1 n�aua 405.34I 1 225 f } $ DIXIELAND i a j = 1 250.32 1501 o �(801-0019-� 1 j 14000122)r -1501 7sa 77jr7 µ OI u11 � cl I I I NI Ir �I �I ml NI I I (421-0001-000/7) 26.65 Ac 10 \ 4 six e —i -o c -- b 0 — E (pH 160 75 75 _ 100 Q "1 7 15 !4 a 125 C3 m - m r3 a o anrsnancnauan, (432-0001-00011) 8.24 Ac `✓ DRIVE r — ILI 1 W� I1 I r., v I � r I `m o I I W y , + +I P� �I I (801-0117- I II i 000/9) 1 1 1. l71 105 50 1 7 -te I g I 162.501 10 1 15 j I f2 —1 I I if I I 2.50 1 162.50 1 3 e 1 90 92 m +I 1 50 6 z 1 NYN 76.9 5 1 g8 -hY+ '5 75 125 O 4 I n0N_ ,11 !2 I r1� 901 3 r92 •^- - 177± l6 8 n LI1787. III 1 112015 ( ti 2 I 101 1 I I s — — —r8o/ oo2a;oodia� 16 17 f- — 4 5 1 g 502.43 0 (80h ° 0116-010/51 1 185 ��----J 5 1 67 l00 5 ro a 3 (801-00�7-0100 J l o a -T- 6 f 7 j 5 1 1 19 1•----I 7 c I i —4�°�—I-- 3 f80/ 0084 �00 2 18 n 116 I 1 1 I 544L9+_ (801- o (801- Nrcllu iOr 4 15 0 1(801- 1` !r 12 J 13 _4 _1 1 I 6 7 I r--- 3 g Inn 01I6-01219 " I z_ ` rr- I I 4 I 6 1 ` 1—. 1 I x�3ir1 5 r L TWP. 35S.-RNG. 40E. ° 1 MILES I 5/2 SOUTHEAST OUAORANT ° aaa t1]P na° ]a+a I FEET I a]aP NORTHEAST QUADRANT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA at2 vAFE ]S OF TWP. 35S:ANO. 40E. mI4i,5RClN AYc�I Z OaCEQA AYFLr�' � : CFRCEQA AVEI •• a ¢ `i �C� _ a as wMaCR AVT o>_SI NAL£W AYE a V / \ GASCQLA ♦ A % • 3 +.ArSS A A4R2- A r7 I Dry or i �• `� I; n rcor i l� R6SELYR AY<r I.I�I /3 u�- Q wfiTF3Y AVE 22t 7 w .°.;..� _ �- �.:rP,S �', 23 24 W EL RANOIO CR. _ . S Orl °G n Qt AZALE.Y AK. �Yrl�l /T�� GGRL PAN AYP 507i PIERCE QowA� INDIAN YK}1Y A If W NOwE °R CIIAFI-CS \ ,) a•. e.... Y II.Sb AG GA 6 allrllON ..•� .. ., r....i.%. L\ i .. _ 1 vPtS CHARLES E. h \ �� SHIRLEY 1 y < �� •r. yH,CH PGnr I d WlPbl S g:z .yK OF OELAY .�. Si _ ;3 ar.°Ri. wG.-r/ ` I rsP•w • I � 25 {: n a. nnPrQ RS qN 2 r _ a \ FRANCS Iuffllif \ r W Kra FRANCS! ST. ¢ � � IUI J13-T/➢ �� q I RIVER GRA-SYP r�<i5 PAY.o� arY a< i L wa w S wC yt , R. RIERCE \G°RT MERQ/ / rr/ \ `_ 5drY O�•i� ,A z /ARR.EPS AM � °cx!°N °R •_ a- i.T_ra eRT P i5 .. \. : sr.5i OF RGRroA ': �> ;~.;Yh - ;..I .aqua �:.+a r\r— C rr: ,o�E GEPr n [uLrurrn+rE ] R 3 AGRIR b a a<' GEuELaPant GEvEUiPuEnr p wS OSS/ c-rK!", : T ERIrUF A7w T,.EnruAE i ': S UARe2T AYEdc.iPaw 51 lil_I, 31Z-OOOi-000/ \ i. Ac i j .I.fiE ee SJ.+6 ac� \c-\ s +n -'•+FI u ERS.WE \\ 8 So=�,K V R. PROP.� .AI�ur-u � 1 '°il inC. KO 9N.r IJr/O \ � �-am-mo/fL 4 36 r.0 � il.b. A<. 35 ,f:2.c yl .i K4, PR°P. IwC. • g 4y I u =� raRl n "C�\. '`4 __? .n,r :I �F• r. z F I I i �C n I^ N %LN° to _ Pi 3 t� ' ;;, _ooa'-oa / �FE tl�...-¢r. i:U.ia.< P� '%+GG. it �'V _ wa • u A OR n �� jj'�; AOE TWO 15S.-RNG dOE. - ,l nn noa• n_n SEE PAGE 51 TWP. 3a S: RNC. .w AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney SUBJECT: Street Naming - Loop Road Resolution No. 01-82 ITEM NO. C-6B DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] PRESENTED BY: Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manager BACKGROUND: The Florida Department of Transportation is preparing plans for the reconstruction of State Road 68 (Orange Avenue). In addition, the Department is also preparing plans to construct a new roadway on property donated to St. Lucie County. This roadway will begin on the north side of Orange Avenue between Big John's Feed and Stoney's Gas Station and extend northward approximately 700 feet. It will then turn eastward and intersect Jenkins Road approximately 1,000 feet north of Orange Avenue. The Property Acquisition Division received a request from the Florida Department of Transportation (copy attached) to name this roadway. To date, the Florida Department of Transportation has referred to this roadway as Loop Road based on its functionality. Staff has reviewed the proposed street name of Loop Road, as shown on the attached map, to eliminate any possibility of duplication or similar street names. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: January 23, 2001 - Board accepted the Warranty Deeds for the necessary right-of-way of Loop Road. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Resolution No. 01-82 to name LOOP ROAD, authorize the Chairman to execute the Resolution, instruct staff to record the Resolution in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, and inform the necessary Utilities and Public Agencies of the naming of LOOP ROAD. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [X APPROVED [ ] DENIED � � ( ] OTHER: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals [XX] County Attorney: [XX] Public works: L [XX] County Engineer: 1-'1[Ya• [XX] Originating Dept.: �_ [XX] Road & Bridge: ,y—f�-- [ ] Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) G:\ACQ\WP\JOAnn\Street Names\Loop Road\Agenda.wpd Eff. 5/96 *.. ..r 0 n 0 z 2 3 ------------ I o I I I I o I rr � g Mac J z �e�d Stattiion sine Peterbilt i i i I I I Orange Avenue N cn c c v U Community Development Proposed Loop Road y Geographic Information Systems Nam' Map prepmd February 20, 2001 �bmbMVM.IIY vFUW bw � Y MMM bO"9 ��. 1*.. 'WO, Florida Department o Transportation BUSH DISTRICT IV HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN GOVERNOR 3400 WEST COMMERCIAL BLVD- FORT LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA 33309-3421 TELEPHONE: (954) 777-4400 January 30, 2001 Mr. Don West, PE St Lucie County Engineer 2300 Virginia Ave 2od Floor Annex, Room 229 Ft Pierce, FL 34982-5652 RE: "LOOP ROAD" NAME DearMr:West: THONW FBA TiL SECRETARY 1 - 22001 I ENGINEER;;; 'G As you are aware, the Florida Department of Transportation (the Department) is preparing plans for the reconstruction of SR 68. In addition, the Department is also preparing plans to construct a new roadway on property that has been donated to St. Lucie County. This roadway will connect SR 68 to Jenkins Road North and has been tentatively called the "Loop Road". The attached plan sheets RD3-RD6, RD25-RD29, and RD32-RD34 show SR 68, "Loop Road", and Jenkins Rd North respectively. To date, the Department has referred to this roadway as the "Loop Road" based on the functionality of the road. However, since this will be a County road, the Department would like to know what St. Lucie County would prefer as the name of the road. A written response, by April 1, 2001, is requested that clearly defines what St. Lucie County desires as the road name. No response will indicate that the name "Loop Road" is what St. Lucie County prefers as the name for this road. Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions regarding this issue. I can be reached at (954) 777-4438 (Suncom: 436-4438). Sincerely; Leslie Wetherell Project Engineer LW/ms attachment cc: Mike Powley—SLC Engineering —Letter Only Howard Webb—FDOT D4 Asst Design Engineer —Letter Only File —Letter Only C:\Projects\230108-1-SR68\roadway\text files\LoopRdNametoDonWest.doc www.dot.state.fl.us on v This instrument prepared by: JoAnn M Riley under the direction of Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 RESOLUTIONNO. 01-82 A RESOL UTION NAMING THAT CERTAIN ROADWAYAS LOOP ROAD LYING IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board ofCounty Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Section 336.05(I), Florida Statutes, authorizes the Board of County Commissioners to name and rename streets and roads lying outside the boundaries of any incorporated municipality. 2. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 87-8, Part A, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 1-17, Roads and Bridges, Section 1-17-54, there shall be no duplications of street names in St. Lucie County, Florida. 3. Pursuant to St. Lucie County Land Development Code Section 7.05.08(C)(2), streets, regardless of functional classification, which run parallel to the north -south base line (Orange Avenue) shall be called Avenue, Drive or some other designation beginning with a letter in the first half (A through M) of the alphabet. Streets, regardless of classification, which run parallel to the east -west base line (U.S. Highway 1) shall be called Terrace, Place orsome other designation beginning with a letter in the second half (N through Z) of the alphabet. Only streets classified as arterials or major collectors by St. Lucie County shall be designated Boulevard, I M Highway, or Road. These designations may be used regardless of direction. 4. The following street name has been reviewed, verified and approved by the Community Development Department, 911, and the Property Acquisition Division. 5. That County owned and maintained roadway that will begin on the north side of Orange Avenue between Big John's Feed and Stoney's Gas Station and extend northward approximately 700 feet. It will then turn eastward and intersect Jenkins Road approximately 1, 000 feet north of Orange Avenue more particularly defined according to the attached map shall be named LOOP ROAD. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. That County owned and maintained roadway that will begin on the north side of Orange Avenue between Big John's Feed and Stoney's Gas Station and extend northward approximately 700 feet. It will then turn eastward and intersect Jenkins Road approximately 1, 000 feet north of Orange Avenue more particularly defined according to the attached map shall be named LOOP ROAD. B. The sole purpose of this Resolution is to establish the name of the Roadway set out above. C. The Property Acquisitions Division is hereby directed to notify the necessary Utilities and Public Agencies regarding the naming of LOOP ROAD. After motion and second, the vote on this Resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson XXX Vice -Chairman Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX 2 Commissioner John Bruhn XXX Commissioner Paula Lewis XXX PASSED AND DULYADOPTED THIS 27th day of March, 200I. ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK G. UCQIWPVoAnnISireet Names)Loop Roadl Resolution. wpd 3 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. L UCIE COUNTY CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTYATTORNEY `- AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney SUBJECT: Revocable License Agreement Robert C. Fender ITEM NO. C-6C DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING[ ] CONSENT [XX] PRESENTED BY: Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manager BACKGROUND: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection Petroleum Cleanup Section previous investigations indicate contamination on Mr. Fender's property may be moving off site towards, and then under, Oleander Avenue, adjacent to the County Compound. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection is requiring seven (7) monitoring wells to be installed on Mr. Fender's property and two (2) monitoring wells to be installed within the right-of-way of Oleander Avenue. Attached for your consideration you will find a Revocable License Agreement, sketch of the encroachment area, and supporting documentation from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Custom Solutions International, Inc. FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Revocable License Agreement, authorize the Chairman to execute the Revocable License Agreement and instruct Mr. Fender to record the Agreement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [) OTHER: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Coordi natio n/Signatu res [XX] CountyAttorney:[XX] Public Works:_ [XX] County Engineer [XX] Originating Dept.�� [XX] Road & Bridge. / [ ) Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 G\ACaWPWoAnnNUi nse Agreements\Fender\BCCAgenda.wpd %W *400 This instrument prepared by: JoAnn M. Riley under the direction of Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 REVOCABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered this day of 2001, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (the "County") and ROBERT C. FENDER, a married adult, of 8801 S. Indian River Drive, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982- 7857, (the "Owner"). WHEREAS, the Owner owns property described as follows: MARAVILLA GARDENS SUBDIVISION - UNIT THREE - BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 150 RUN EAST 160 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 200 FEET, THENCE WEST 160 FEET, THENCE NORTH 200 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING - LESS AS IN OR 31-480 AND LESS AS IN OR 1017-2479 (0.64 AC) (OR 168-990). Location: Southeastern corner of Oleander Avenue and Edwards Road. Parcel Identification Number: 2427-601-0003-050/8. WHEREAS, the County is the owner of the property described as: THAT PORTION OF A COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, KNOWN AS EDWARDS ROAD AND OLEANDER AVENUE INTERSECTION, LYING IN SECTIONS 27 AND 28, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Petroleum Cleanup Section pervious investigations indicate contamination may be moving off site towards, and then under, Oleander Avenue. WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection is requiring the Owner to install nine monitoring wells as indicated in a letter to Custom Solutions International, Inc. (CSI) dated January 9, 2001, attached as Exhibit "B." WHEREAS, the Department of Environmental Protection has contracted with the firm Custom Solutions International, Inc. (CSI) to satisfy their requirements regarding the petroleum contamination, monitoring, and potential cleanup. WHEREAS, Custom Solutions International, Inc. will install seven (7) monitoring wells on the Owner's property and two (2) monitoring wells within the right-of-way of Oleander Avenue, attached as Exhibit "A." %we `"r WHEREAS, the County has agreed to allow the installation of the two (2) monitoring wells subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Revocable License Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. The County agrees to grant the Owners a limited Revocable License Agreement for the purpose of installing monitoring wells as indicated on the attached Exhibit "A." This license shall extend only to the above -referenced location and shall not extend to the construction and/or installation of any other structures. 2. This license shall be binding on future successors and assignees of the Owner. The Owner agrees to provide the County with notice of any change in ownership pursuant to Paragraph seven (7) of this Agreement. 3. The County shall have the right, at the sole discretion of the County Engineer, to terminate this Agreement with or without cause and require removal of the encroachment at the Owner's sole expense upon thirty (30) days written notice to the Owner. The County Engineer may, in lieu of termination, request that the Owner perform certain alterations to the monitoring wells at the Owner's sole expense. However, if such alteration is not performed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer, the County shall be entitled to exercise its right to terminate this Agreement. Owner shall, at all times, maintain the well location so as not to be a detriment to the traveling public, and any damage to the Right -of -Way, pavement, or roadbed during installation or maintenance operations shall be immediately corrected to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. 4. The monitoring wells shall be constructed in accordance with all applicable building and highway codes and safety regulations of the County and State of Florida, and shall be maintained solely at the expense of the Owner. 5. The Owner agrees to allow County employees access to the location of the monitoring wells for County purposes as determined by the County Engineer. 6. The Owner agrees to provide copies of the results of the sampling of the two monitoring wells located within the right-of-way of Oleander Avenue to the County Engineer. 7. All notices, requests and other communications dealing directly or indirectly with this license shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or carrier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: As to County: County Engineer Engineering Division 2300 Virginia Avenue, 2nd Floor Fort Pierce, FL 34982 As to Owners: Robert C. Fender 8801 S. Indian River Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34982-7857 With Copies to: County Attorney Administration Building Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue, 3`" Floor Fort Pierce, FL 34982 St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Building Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue, 3" Floor Fort Pierce, FL 34982 *4W '' or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Sect the Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. S. As consideration for the County agreeing to allow the encroachment of the monitoring wells as set forth herein, the Owner agrees to indemnify and hold the County harmless from and against all claims, liability, demands, damages, expenses, fees, fines, penalties, suits, proceedings, actions and costs of actions, including reasonable attorneys fees of any kind or nature arising or in any way connected with the use, occupation, management, or control of the above right-of-way by Owner or their agents, servants, employees, patrons, or invitees, or resulting in injury to persons or property, or loss of life or property of any kind or nature whatsoever, sustained during Owners use of the property. 9. Owner shall promptly record this Revocable License Agreement in the Official Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Owner shall pay any document excise taxes and the cost of recording this Revocable License Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year above first written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPUTY CLERK WITNESSES: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ROBERT C. FENDER 3 .00 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by Robert C. Fender and he produced and who did take an oath. WITNESS my hand and official seal, this day of day of 2001, _ (type of identification) Signature of Notary Public 2001. Name of Notary Public Typed, Printed or Stamped My commission expires: C:\ACQ\W PQoAnn\License Agreements\Fender\LicenseAgreement.wpd 4 Ja% ° uarw u mn � cow.. ir.Y-n-uaq waver rwn+rw +� s — — — — — xouass aw un ------------ TYY M Htl]YU] ItM�OWA I §I � A i a Et al AID a � *■. `.r Custom Solutions International, Inc. Fax: Innovative Environmental Solutions 902 Clint Moore Raton , Ste. 208 (561)998-2699 (561)998-1699 March 1, 2001 Ms. Joann Riley Saint Lucie County Property Acquisition Division 2300 Virginia Avenue n j Fort Pierce, Fl 34982 RE: Installation of Monitoring Wells in County Right -of -Way Merchants # 5 3100 Oleander Blvd. Fort Pierce, Florida Dear Ms. Riley: Custom Solutions International, Inc. (CSI) is hereby requesting from Saint Lucie County, permission to install two monitoring wells inside country right-of-way near the intersection of Oleander Blvd, and Edwards Road. This work is being done in conjunction with the Florida Department of Environmental Protections Pre -approval Program for the cleanup of petroleum contaminate sites. (See enclosed work order from FDEP). CSI will use these wells to assess the horizontal and vertical spread of any gasoline pollutants off the site and toward the west. The wells will be installed at the locations indicated in the enclosed Facility Layout Diagram. The construction details of these wells are also enclosed. It is necessary to install these wells since pervious investigations indicate that the contamination may be moving off site towards, and then under, Oleander Blvd. The two wells on the west side of Oleander will confirm this fact. Once installed, these wells will be sampled as required by FDEP until the site is fully cleaned up. It is impossible to say for certain how long the wells will need to be there, but it should not be any longer than five years. Once all. site work is complete, the wells will be removed, and the property returned to as close to its original condition as possible. It will take less than one day to install these two wells. During this period, it may be necessary to block off the right lane of Southbound Oleander Blvd. to traffic. It will not be necessary to block traffic when the wells are sampled. The wells will be flush mounted into the soil or payment so that vehicle and pedestrian traffic can easily move over the well location. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me at the telephone number listed above. CSI thanks you for your assistance in securing permission to install these wells. tir I%w mw Sincerely, > Charles J. /Walther, P.E. V.P. Engineering Jeb Bush Governor Department of .r. Environmental. Protection Twin Towers Office Building David B. Struhs 2600 Blair Stone Road Secretary Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 January 9, 2001 Mr. Charles J. Walther, P.E. Custom Solutions International, Inc. 902 Clint Moore Road, Suite 208 Boca Raton, FL 33487 Subject: Work Order Merchants #5 3100 Oleander Boulevard Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County FDEP Facility ID# 568516159 Work Order # 2001-95-0224-0 Dear Mr. Walther: Enclosed please find the preapproval work order for the additional site assessment. This work order includes 11 hand -auger soil borings to two feet into the water table, approximately 5 to 8 feet below land surface (ft bis), screened continuously with Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA). Soil samples representative of high, medium, and low OVA readings will be collected using Encores and analyzed with EPA Methods 8021, 8310, and FL -PRO. Nine monitoring wells (MW-1, 4, 5, and 7 through 12) will be installed using split spoons to a depth of 13 ft b1s with 10 foot 0.010 inch slotted screen (3-13 ft bls) and screened continuously with OVA. Groundwater samples will be collected from the nine newly installed monitoring wells to be analyzed for EPA Methods 8021, 8310, and FL -PRO. Verbal authorization will be requested from the field as necessary. Please note the following changes made to the work order that changed from the proposal: • If it is not possible to install MW-11 at its proposed location, then it maybe relocated to the southwest comer of Oleander Boulevard. • An additional well MW-12 is to be installed at the location where SB-8 was proposed. • Soil boring SB-8 was moved to between the dispensers, west of SB-10, if achievable. • An additional soil boring should be installed in the area of the former diesel dispenser island. • The well depths are to be to 13 ft bls with a screened interval from 3 to 13 ft bls. • The number of wells to be sampled, the laboratory costs, and the drilling costs increased, respectively. "Protect, Conserve and Manage Florida's Environment and Natural Resources" Visit Our Internet Site At: www.dep-s ed paperdwmlbureauslbpss.htm PoNed on ev 11Ns COVER-WODOC Mr. Charles J. Walther, P.A:..'`r FDEP Facility ID # 568516159 January 9, 2001 Page two Ilse its associated cost, are included in the drilling The utility lPetrole per the updatedum Cleanup Preapproval Program Standard Operating Produres,e p October 2000. A permit was added to obtain the necessary St. Lucie County permit. Also, an area survey was added including an area use map, a potable well survey map, and water levels for the remaining monitoring wells onsite not sampled. Please send the original and three Remember that you may not initiate this work until the signed work order has been returned to the Florida Department f Eyou°r records) for he FDEPon FDEPin are of Penny King at the letterhead copies (retaining a copy address, Mail Station 4585. This cover letter does not need to be returned. Persons responsible for conducting fieldactivities begassociated e with he work order are required to notify he FDEP at least seven days p 264 or at the if you should have any questions, please contact me at (850) 222-6446 ext. letterhead address, Mail Station 4585. Sincerely, Janette Cousins WRS Staff Engineer Petroleum Cleanup Section 5 Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems E-mail: jcousins@wrsie.com Shawn Abbott FDEP Team Leader Petroleum Cleanup Section 5 Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems /jc enclosure cc: Robert C. Fender, Indian River Oil Company, Inc. 3700 Okeechobee Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34947 File FDEP Facility ID # Site Name: Site Address Site City : Contractor Name: Contractor Adddress Contractor City : Contractor Representative FDEP Site Manager -. ''reapproval Program VV -k Order Petrole 0224 - 0`d Work Order Number : 2001 - 95 - $7450404555 Category 087888 - 01 568516159 Cost Center : Score . 52 MERCHANTS #5 Contract # : NIA EDWARDS RD & OLEANDER Eligibility : Priority score FORT PIERCE Site County: ST. LUCIE Custom Solutions International, Inc. Contractor ID : 00410 902 Clint Moore Rd., Suite 208 FEID : 65-0702876 Boca Raton phone: 561-998-2699 Charles J. Walther, P.E. FDEP Phone: 850-222-6446 x261 Janette Cousins Cleanup Activity: Supplemental Site Assessment (SSA) Site Assessment (SA) Cleanup Phase'. area survey; (1) tton: Pro osal prep; permit. well install/well Per 12/18/00 Proposal 2-person mobilizations(soil sampling/ ro osal & 1/9/O1 conversation. Includes: P 1-person mobilization(permit+survey); (3) s to 2' into water table 05-lowelbscreened ress t 2' of high, medium, &low OVA readings sampling); install 11 hand -auger soil boring 1,4,5,7-12) @13'bls w/10' screen continuously w/OVA/FID; 3 soil samples rep install 9 MW (MW- 8310,& FL-PRG; w OVA/FID; 9 well samplings w/water levels on Level analyzed w/EPA Methods 8021, generator for 3 days;& Level (3-13') using split spoons screened continuously BRO core drill + g new wells, analyzed w/EPA Methods 6021, 9310, tabular historic & new GW/soil data, updated soil plume map. field notes,& conclusions & 4 General Report discussing site assessment activities, updated GW &contaminant flow contour maps, P requested from the field as needed. recommendations. Verbal authorization shall be Deliverable 1 : Level 4 General Report Deliverable 2 : Deliverable 3: Due Date: 4113/2001 Work Order Total: $ 22,770.74 Retainage : $ 2,277.07 Deliverable 4 Period of Service: Contractor Signature Date to Saturday, October O 2001 The WORK ORDER is trot in effect until signed by all parties. The FDEP will not pay any amount of this WORK ORDER until the date of signed COPY has been returned to the FDEP. The FDEP will not pay farany portion of the scope of work that has not been performed as of the date of the Novice. n Following Pages-- Date --Additional Terms And Conditions O FDEPILP Site Manager. 1 1 , FDEP Manager: Cost Center Administrator Contractor Representative Contractor Representative : �Prnnd contractor signature is 01 FDEP Use Only Technical Review: Initials: Date : / " n initials: Date: Fiscal Review: ---�— 4 printed: 1/9101 page: 1 of 4 C-.\windows\workord\TempCo' .........y........ r Iumd uzVd'UI ICI' uI `"".. i Order PetroleL.. ii,,wreapproval Program V1r _ . Work Order # : 2001 - 95 - 0224 - 0 1. Certification of Performance a. The CONTRACTOR signing this Work Order agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions contained r b. The CONTRACTOR signing this Work Order agrees to perform the approved scope of work at the approved cost. Any changes to the scope of work or cost must be approved in writing by the department. c. The CONTRACTOR agrees that it is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, timely completion and coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications, reports, other services and installations furnished under this agreement. ld. The CONTACTOR represents evel of care and skill) ordinarily exercised by o h1er professional tc'onsultanits under l be osimilrmed in a manner consistent with t s arid similar circumstances at the time the services are performed. petroleum for participation in the rea roval e. The CONTRACTOR certifies that it currentlymeets all of the da Statutes (FtS )S The CONTRACTOR further certifies that it program as required by Sections these Q 711 ratio ()• performance of this will not knowingly permit any of these Qualifications to lapse during the duration of this Work Order. The CONTRACTOR agrees that if any of the Qualifications do lapse, it will immediately notify the FDEP and will suspend the p Work Order until all the Qualifications are met. applicable statutes, f. The CONTRACTOR certifies that it has read, understand and will perform all work in accordance with and any rules and guidance issued by the Department of Environmental Protection and the standards of performance therein. 2. Additional Terms and Conditions e or nable* However. Sectia. on 3 Work Order is sued tothe listed invoices submitted d pursTRAC'uant to this WO R and is not rrk Orderlare assignable. Persons wishing pursuant to exercise this option should contact the department for assistance. certification, or endorsement of the CONTRACTOR by b. The issuance of this Work Order does not constitute an approval.rectors designated in the proposal designated nhthe p oposal.bAny deviation or substitution of subcontractors , or of he work they are to perform rmust be the work as confirmed in writing by the FDEP. gas. Neither does it authorize c. The issuance of this Work Order does not convey any vested rights or any exclusive privile to public or private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement it or approval that may blaws any injury p or regulations. This Work Order is not a waiver of, or approval of, any other Departmen p rrn required for other aspects of the total project which are not addressed. to human health or welfare, animal d. This Work Order does not relieve the CONTRACTOR from liability for harm or injury or plant life, or property, caused by its activities or from penalties therefore; nor does it allow the CONTRACTOR to cause or contribute to pollution in contravention of Florida Statutes and Department rules. e. The Department may unilaterally cancel this Work Order for failure of the CONTRACTOR to allow access to public records as specified by Chapter 119, F.S. J Department personnel, f phorizei ersonnel of a ACTOR,contractb county, ountaping this Work Order secifically agrees to allow y tt observe and inspect the work being performed utnder this Work O der. inc uding;and (1) Access to any records that must be kept under conditions of the Work Order; (2) Inspection of the facility, equipment, practices, or operations required under this Work Order; and (3) Sampling or monitoring of any substances or parameters at any location reasonable or necessary to assure compliance with this Work Order or Department rules. applicable provisions of Sections 287.058 and g. The CONTRACTOR agrees that this Work Order is subject to the 287.0582,F.S. Page: 2 of 4 Printed : 119/01 C:\windows\workord\Legall , i� -, vuya.....cn. u. -1........... _.._ PetrolE_,`,Preapproval Program V Work Order # : 2001 - 95 - 0224 - 0 Order lmdo h. The CONTRACTOR shall pay all subcontractors and vendo fs under this agreement no later than thirty days after receipt of payment for their services from the Department. Partial payments may be made to subcontractors upon receipt of such payment, provided that the amount of the partial payment is the same proportion as paid by the Department. Ali subcontractors must be paid in full prior to submittal ccomp a ed Contractorr Af idavit/Re ease ofCla mmust ac comp nytf the final invoice fortr the this Order. this Work Order. A properly I. If this Work Order has been issued pursuant to a Preapproved Advanced Cleanup (PAC) or Petroleum Cleanup Participation Program (PCPP) contract, then the termination of that contract may result in the immediate termination of this Work Order. 3 Retainage and Forfeiture of Retainaoe a. The CONTRACTOR agrees that the retainage withheld on this Work Order shall not be paid until the full scope of work has been completed to the satisfaction of the Department. The COCONTRACTOR dal agrees system to insure retainage site will bess withheld for the duration of the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) period of payment in lieu of towards cleanup. A CONTRACTOR may negotiate performance milestones for retainage withholding until completion of the project. b. If the CONTRACTOR fails to perform the required scope of work or fails to perform the work in a satisfactory manner, then payment for that work will be forfeited and retainage for the entire Work Order will be forfeited. Failure to perform includes failure to submit the required deliverable or failure to provide adequate documentation that the work was actually performed. In accordance with Section 376.30711(5)(e), F.S., CONTRACTORS who fail to perform the terms of a preapproval agreement can be barred from further participation in the program. c. If a deliverable required by this Work Order is submitted after the due date for the deliverable then the Department reserves the right to withhold payment of the retainage for the entire Work Order. 4. At - Access to Records a. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain books, records and documents directly pertinent to performance under this WORK ORDER in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied. The Department, the State or their authorized representatives shall have access to such records without charge for audit purposes during the term of the WORK ORDER and for three years following WORK ORDER completion. It is not the department's intention to use these audits to seek cost recovery of over -payments, but rather to use these audits to revise and refine the department's cost estimating policies and procedures. However, cost recovery will be pursued if there is evidence of fraud or other illegal activity. 5 Dispute Resolution - Suspension or Cancellation of Work a. The FDEP may order a suspension or cessation of work in order to resolve disputes regarding a CONTRACTOR'S performance or the performance of their subcontractor. If this is necessary, the Department will notify the CONTRACTOR by certified mail with a copy of the notification sent to the property owner. The CONTRACTOR will not be paid for any work performed during such suspension or cancellation unless the dispute is later resolved to include such payment. The Department or CONTRACTOR may request a suspension or cancellation of work. The Department reserves the right to suspend or cancel work for good cause. Good cause includes, but is not limited to, any audit or report indicating that any phase of actual work completed was inconsistent with the approved scope or cost, or failure of a CONTRACTOR to maintain its required Qualifications. b. Suspension or cancellation is not automatic. A notice of intent to suspend or cancel work must be sent certified mail and give the other party at least 10 working days to respond. If the deficiency is remedied within the 10 day period, the Work Order will remain in effect. If the CONTRACTOR does not remedy the deficiency within the 10 day period the Work Order shall be deemed suspended or canceled at the discretion of the Department within 10 days of the close of the 10 day remedy period. In the event the Department determines, in it's sole discretion, that the CONTRACTOR is in breach of the terms and conditions of this Work Order, the Department reserves the right to exercise all remedies at law and equity. Page: 3 of 4 Printed : 119101 C:\windows\workordlLegal2.rj Petrok r Preapproval Program V Order Work Orde*umber : 2001 - 95 - 0224 - 0 Facility ID : 568516159 Site Manager: Janette Cousins Facility Name: MERCHANTS #5 Contractor Name : Custom Solutions International, Inc. Task Description : Supplemental Site Assessment Number Allowed Cos Needed: Markup: Total Item Cost Activit $443.32 1 $443.32 Proposal Preparation (to and from site) 2 People soil sampling, welt install, well $672.67 3 $2,018.01 Mobilization sampling use Not $460.05 1 $460.05 Drilling Setup Time set p/lhr down) Borings for Soil Screening (<=10 ft) with or without groundwater & - $188,38 11 $2,072.18 , Soil Son sample single cased; including split Well Installation (<= 20 ft.) $392.9-0 9 $3,532.50 spoons Well Sampling with Water Levels (per Well) MW-1, 4,5,7,8.9,10,11,12 $189.26 9 $1,703.34 Concrete Bore/Generator:. 3 $438.00 1 $438.00 Inhouse Other days@$148/day 3 soil .9 GW: 8021, 8310. $3,475.50 1 10 % $3,823.05 Laboratory Subcontractors R-PRO ' Precision: 9 MWS 013' w/ 10' $4,502.00 1 10 % $4,952.20 Drilling Subcontractors screen $1,577.20 1 $1,577.20 Level 4 General Report � St. Lucie county permits $604.07 1 $604.07 Permits Mobilization (to and from site) 1 Person pe unit & area survey $361.82 1 $361.82 $785.00 1 $785.00 Site and Area Survey Work Order Totals Standard Invoice S hedule A Package Template Subtotal Retainage : Template Total B Field: $19,074.19 COC, Field Notes (no retainage) : with retainage C Office : $1,419.48 Submittal of Level 4 General Report $20,493.67 $2,277.07 FF $22,770.74 D Remedial Equip. $0.00 E Retainage : $2,277.07 Approval of Level 4 General Report Total: $22,770.74 C:\windows\workord\TempStan.rpt Printed : 1/9/01 Page: 4 of 4 I!r✓, � o � o 0 0) 0 Q:cl d p C: o ' 60 (D r0 �• '� ` co O O O I O 0 �' 1 a w w a w o o yo to p i o w p U G N' N' N: 64 p L A N b6 9; U N y E J c t U cc O; O U y S S ' a, d O �: U T O a a cn: ; co: O'ui Cb h ro w awi U. w: a co 0 m m O w 0 0 I � ca E �� LL 6r,•� Z w w ' C C I O C. III F a� N; ur. aoa �o. 7 CL 6q': om f ma r' 6q E w a E E w ° a cc m od0v`d0 IL ILa IL oFJ ; O' O t to : Iui:69 Mmo ; �:osv as � a CL A w w c owo L dwwN m w . O: 0. W co: OI + WK O•ci 'O CO:A UO �'Efl 1 II uj m N w to O O> O O LQ > o > m W .0 C+i et N3 t* �z mC) c O `o w w,: o 0. a. U v dI E: E w Q' �: m m 3 u c.<r; : w... E i N: '� L: E:-, m! > o .0 O d' c E �i :�: :;:° : A rn a: m m;mj a c rn:cn.U), cn aj Como J rn :.) _ n o mom; •Z;ti; 2�w 'O Z, U: n. (� � �.. 2' X 2- CONCRETE PAD WITH '10 SLOPE FOR POSITIVE DRANAGE TOP OF CASING l kii u IN:�� SCH 40 PVC RISER 31.il'I •Il:�l.l .1C=I .�rll WATER ITA3LE O APPRO- _' 10 FT. 13 FT j BOTTOM OF SCREEN DIAMETERa COMPRESSIONDRIVEOVER COVER AND MANHOLE WATER/AIR TIGHT •. r= "NEAT ► rrwEkrr GROUT 30/65 FINE SAND SEAL I QUARTZ SAN& FILT,. .ACK 21. 1L�1. 1= 20 DIAMETER pVC SLOTTED SCREEN d�rll • . 10 IN. SLOT SIZE) NOTE: NOT TO SCALE MERCHANTS 115 3100 OLEADER BOULEVARD FT. PIERCE, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA CUSTOM SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. WELL BOTTOM POINT TYPICAL SHALLOW WATER TABLE MONITORING WELL DETAIL PROJECT: 200030 FIGURE:2 %W AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Utilities Department C-7-A DATE: March 27,2001 REGULAR [ l PUBLIC HEARING [ l CONSENT [Xl PRESENTED BY: William R. Blazak SUBJECT: Agreement extension with the City of Punta Gorda and Sunstate Meter & Supply,Inc. for the purpose of purchasing water meters for the various St. Lucie County Utility Districts. FUNDS AVAIL: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: BOCC approved the agreement in June of 1999 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the extension of the agreement between the City of Punta Gorda and Sunstate Meter & Supply, Inc. for the purchase of water meters. COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Originating Dept Finance Director [ ] DENIED CONCURRENCE: Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: a Purchasing Other: Other:_ if applicable) _ Eff. 5/96 1 60ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIORCRS MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: William Blazak, Utility Director DATE: March 27, 2001 n UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILLIAM 6LAZAK DIRECTOR RE: Contract Extension - City of Punta Gorda / Sunstate Meter & Supply , Inc. BACKGROUND: In June of 1999 the Utility Department requested that the Board approve the "piggy- backing" of an existing agreement with the City of Punta Gorda for the purchase of water meters. By utilizing existing competitively bid agreements, the cost to St. Lucie County is significantly reduced not only through the purchasing department but by Utilities as well. The utility department does not have the volume of meters to purchase annually to receive the competitive pricing afforded the City of Punta Gorda. Because of the competitive pricing reflected in the agreement, the City of Punta Gorda has elected to extend the agreement for an additional year. Likewise, St. Lucie County desires to extend the agreement an additional year. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the extension of the agreement with the City of Punta Gorda and Sunstate Meter & Supply, Inc. JOHN D. URUHN, District No. 1 • DOUG COWARD, District No. 2 * P Administrator LA A.LEWIS, District Douglas Anderson . NIE HUTCHINSON, District No. 4 • CLIFF BARNES, District No. 5 Cou 2300 Virginia Avenue • Forr Pierce, FL 34982 9 Phone (561) 462-1150 • FAX (561) 462-1153 e �Wv ``d FIRST AMENDMENT TO JUNE 22, 1999 AGREEMENT WITH SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY, Inc. THIS FIRST AMENDMENT, made this day of 2001, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the "County" and SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY, INC., a Florida corporation, or its successors and assigns, hereinafter called the "Vendor". WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Agreement on June 22, 1999 in conjunction with an Agreement between the city of Punta Gorda and 5unstate Meter & Supply, Inc. for water meters; and, WHEREAS, the Agreement between the City of Punta Gorda and 5unstate Meter & Supply, Inc. was extended to March 22, 2002; and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the term of the June 22, 1999 Agreement to March 22, 2002 under the same terms and conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 7 "TERM" is amended to read: 7. TERM The term of this Agreement shall begin on June 22,1999 and shall terminate on March 22, 2002. 2. Except as amended herein, the remaining terms and conditions of the June 22, 1999 Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPUTY CLERK 9:\atty\a9r m&\suretate 1A _1 CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY INC. BY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA E PRINT NAME: G G t Eta TITLE: / ,Q�z�S ,& g:\atty\agreemnt\sunstate IA -2- M EWA AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this CLZ day of 4(:/��� 1999, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the "COUNTY," and SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY, INC., a Florida corporation, or its successors, executors, administrators, and assigns hereinafter called the "VENDOR" in conjunction with an AGREEMENT between the CITY of PUNTA GORDA and SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY, INC. for water meters: W I T N E S S E T H: - WHEREAS, pursuant to due procedures of law, bids were received by the CITY of PUNTA GORDA for the supplying of water meters, as described below; and WHEREAS, the CITY of PUNTA GORDA considered the bids, and determined that the bid of the Vendor was the best and most desirable bid submitted, and awarded the Agreement to the Vendor; and WHEREAS, in the St. Lucie County Purchasing Policy, the County is authorized to purchase goods from the Vendor at the same price as the CITY of PUNTA GORDA's Agreement; and NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations set forth below, the County and the Vendor desire to enter into an Agreement as follows: 1. PURPOSE That Vendor agrees with County that pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Notice of Award, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A," Vendor shall sell and the County shall buy certain herein described water meters at the unit prices as set forth in the Vendor's""Cost Proposal," and May 17, 1999, "Fax" attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "B." Quantities stated in Exhibit "B" are for Vendor's guidance only and no guarantee is given or implied by the County as to what quantities will be ordered by the County during the term of this Agreement. The County expressly reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantities set forth in Exhibit "B" to meet additional or reduced requirements of the County. %ft. 1"0 2. SPECIFICATIONS All water meters provided to the County by the Vendor under this Agreement shall comply with the specifications and drawings attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "C." 3. DELIVERY OF WATER METERS AND PAYMENT TO VENDOR Vendor shall deliver all water meters under this Agreement as set forth in Cost Proposal. The County shall make payment to the Vendor within forty-five (45) days of the date of receipt and acceptance by the County of an invoice for the delivery. Payment to the Vendor shall be based on the unit prices set forth in the Cost Proposal. 4. CONTACT PERSONS The Contact Person for the County is William Blazak at (561) 462-1150. The Contact Person for the Vendor is Jeff Kimbrough at (800)342-3409. The parties shall direct all matters arising in connection with the performance of this Agreement, other than invoices and notices, to the attention of the Contact Person for attempted resolution or action. The Contact Persons shall be responsible for overall resolution or action. The Contact Persons shall be responsible for overall coordination and oversight relating to the performance of this Agreement. 5. WARRANTY Vendor shall warrant all water meters delivered under this Agreement to be free from any and all defects for a period of one year from the date of delivery to the County. Service calls and materials to repair water meters delivered under this Agreement shall be provided at no cost to the County for a period of one (1) year from the date of delivery of the System. 6. TAXES The County is exempt from the payment of all sales, use and like taxes. The County's tax exempt number shall be shown on all purchase orders. -2- `,, 7. TERM The term of this Agreement shall be till December 31, 2000 from the date of this Agreement. 8. TERMINATION ��--SHI If either party fails to fulfill it's obligations under this Agreement in a timely and proper manner, the other party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of any deficiency and by allowing the party in default ten (10) calendar days to correct the deficiency. If the defaulting party fails to correct the deficiency within this time, this Agreement shall terminate at the end of the ten (10) calendar day period. With regard to the Vendor, the following shall be considered a default under this Agreement: (1) Failure to make complete deliveries within the promised time. (2) Unauthorized substitution or delivery of goods deemed by the County to be inferior. (3) Inability of the Vendor to fulfill the terms and conditions of this Agreement. B . WITHOUT CAUSE Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause upon thirty (30) days prior written notice. 9. INDEMNITY To the extent of the insurance requirements set forth herein, the Vendor shall and will indemnify and hold harmless the County from and against any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, expenses, fees, fines, penalties, suits, proceedings, actions, and costs of actions, including reasonable attorney's fees of any kind and nature arising or growing out of or in any way connected with -3- 1 *4b.. ..r _this Agreement except for injuries, damages or claims which are the result of the primary negligence of the County, its agents, servants, or employees and for which the County is legally, directly, and primarily liable. The Vendor hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this Agreement includes specific consideration for the indemnification provided herein. lo. INSURANCE The Vendor shall procure and. maintain during the life of this Agreement insurance of the types and subject to the limits set forth below. The Vendor shall also provide the County with evidence of this insurance in the form of Certificates of Insurance which shall be subject to the County's approval for adequacy. The Vendor shall provide and maintain during the life of this Agreement, at his, its or their own expense, Workers' Compensation insurance coverage to apply for all employees for Florida statutory limits. The Vendor shall provide and maintain during the life of this Agreement, at his, its or their own expense, Commercial General Liability insurance on an occurrence basis for a minimum combined single limit of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00) per occurrence, for claims of bodily injury including death, property damage and personal injury. •uu • The vendor shall provide and maintain during the life of this Agreement, at his, its or their own expense, Commercial Auto Liability for claims of bodily injury and property damage for minimum limits of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00)combined single limit. 11. AUDIT The Vendor agrees that the County or any of its duly 1 1 `,, N.4 authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Vendor involving transactions related to this Agreement. The Vendor agrees that payment(s) made under this Agreement shall be subject to reduction for amounts charged thereto which are found on the basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this Agreement. The Vendor shall refund by check payable to the County the amount of such reduction of payments. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions.' therefrom are resolved, or three years after completion of the project and issuance of the final certificate, whichever is sooner. 12. PUBLIC RECORDS The Vendor shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the County in conjunction with this Agreement 13. ASSIGNMENT Vendor shall not assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm without first obtaining County's written approval. 14. NOTICES All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: As To County: St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Building Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue, 3rd Floor Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 -5- With A Copy To: St. Lucie County Attorney Administration Building Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue, 3rd Floor Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 1 1 1 a. As To Vendor: Jeff Kimbrough Sunstate Meter & Supply, Inc. 14001 HWY 26 East Newberry, F1 32669 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 15. INDULGENCE NOT WAIVER The indulgence of either party with regard to any breach or failure to perform any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of the provision or any portion of this Agreement either at the time the breach or failure occurs or at any time throughout the term of this Agreement. 16. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Vendor represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Section 112.311, Florida Statutes (1989) and as may be amended from time to time. Vendor further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said performance. Vendor shall promptly notify the County in writing by certified mail of all potential conflicts of interest prohibited by existing state law for any prospective business association, interest or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence the Vendor's judgment or quality of services being provided hereunder. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of work that the Vendor may undertake and request an opinion of the County as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the County, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the Vendor. The County `.. _agrees to notify the Vendor of its opinion by certified mail within thirty (30) days of receipt of notification by the Vendor. If, in the opinion of the County, the prospective business association, interest or circumstance would not constitute a conflict of interest by the Vendor, the County shall so state in the notification and the Vendor shall, at his/her option, enter into said association, interest or circumstance and it shall be deemed not in conflict of interest with respect to services provided to the County by the Vendor under the terms of this Agreement. 17. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS In the event of any dispute concerning the terms and , conditions of this Agreement in the event of any action by any party to this Agreement to judicially interpret or enforce this Agreement any provision hereof, or in any dispute arising in any manner from this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs, fees and expenses, including but not limited to, witness fees, expert fees, consultant fees, attorney, paralegal and legal assistant fees, costs and expenses and other professional fees, costs and expenses, whether suit be brought or not, and whether any settlement shall be entered in any declaratory action, at trial or on appeal. 18. DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any disputes relating to a question of fact arising under this Agreement shall be resolved through good faith efforts upon the part of the Vendor and the County or its representative. At all times, the Vendor shall carry on the work and maintain its progress schedule in accordance with the requirements of the Agreement and the determination of the County or its representatives, pending resolution of the dispute. Any dispute which is not resolved by mutual agreement shall be decided by the County or its representatives who shall reduce the decision to writing. 19. MEDIATION In the event of a dispute between the parties in connection -7- V400 "® with this Agreement other than a question of fact to be resolved as described above, the parties agree to submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non -binding mediation prior to filing a lawsuit. The parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding concerning the disputed issue. 20. INTERPRETATION• VENUE This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Agreement may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Vendor has affixed his, its, or their names, or name. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ST. L,UCC%IECOUNTTYY, FLORIDA BY: j — CHAIRMAN %NW .00 WITNESSES: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY INC. BY AUTHORIZED REPRESE NTATIVE PRINT NAME: TITLE -..i-..l�ai7S Y.� V I♦ .n:yl� cm OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA PHONE% :�941) 575-3348 PAX. 1941) 575-3387 ALT FAX- 1..941) 575.334C August 4, 190-8 Sunstate Meter & Supply, Inc. 14001 1iwy #25, East Newberry, FL 32669 Attend in: N.A. ELLENSURG RE: NOTICE OF AWARD - BID *METERS031299 pl'.7RCHASLVG DEPART tENI 326 West Marion Avenue Punta Gonda, Voriaa, 33950 The City is pleased to inform Sunstate Meter & Suppry, Inc. that you have been awarded the above referenced bid to furnish and deliver to the City water meters as required and allow trade in of obsolete meters. In addition, the City shall be given a 26% discount for items that were not listed in the bid. The contract shall become effective March 23, 1999 through March 22. 2000. The continuance of the second year shall be at the sole discretion of the City. Thank you for your interest in the City of Punta Gorda. Sincerely, CITY OF PUNTA GORDA M. Marian Day, CP PPS A/Purchasing Agent In t3taa^,;,1„ l charlotte County Exk.6 t PC PART IV Ifto COST PROPOSAL FOR _ PURCHASE OF DISPLACEMENT WATER METERS FORMAL BID #METERS031299 CITY OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA EXHIBIT "A" BID OFFER Proposalof Sunstate Meter & Supply,Inc- (hereinafter called 'BIDDER"),organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida doing business as Corporation to the CITY OF PUNTA GORDA (hereinafter called "OWNER"). ' Insert "a corporation", "a partnership", or "an individual" as applicable. In compliance with your Advertisement for BIDS, BIDDER hereby proposes to furnish and deliver, as required, DISPLACED WATER METERS - FORMAL BID #METERS031299 in strict accordance with the Contract Documents, within the time set forth therein, and at the prices stated below. 2. By presentation of this Bid, each BIDDER certifies, and in the case of a joint Bid each party thereto, certified as to his/her own organization, that this Bid has been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement as to any matter relating to this Bid with any other BIDDER or with any competitor. 3. In submitting this Bid, BIDDER represents: (a) BIDDER has examined copies of all the Contract Documents and of the following addenda: NO: NO: DATED: DATED: (receipt of which is hereby acknowledged) and also copies of the Advertisement or Invitation to Bid and the Instructions to Bidders; (b) This Bid is genuine and not made in the interest of or in behalf of any undisclosed person, firm or corporation and is not submitted in conformity with any agreement or rules of any group, association, organization or corporation; BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Bidder to submit a false or sham Bid; BIDDER has not solicited or induced F CITY OF PUNTA GORDA Page 16 FORMAL BID #METERS031299 L J b f 13 �«5z 1 of-5 J any person, firm or a corporation to refrain from bidding; and BIDDER has not sought by collusion to obtaiNwe himself any advantage over any other b4der or over OWNER. 4. BIDDER will furnish and deliver the water meters and accept trade-in water meters at the unit prices - stated in the Bid Schedule. 5. Communications concerning this Bid shall be addressed to the address of BIDDER indicated below: SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY,INC. 14001 Hwy# 26,East Newberrv,Florida 32669 SUBMITTED on March 2 By:Sunstate Meter & Supply,Inc Corporation Name FLORIDA State of Incorporation By: N.A. Ellenburg Name of Authorized Person 1999 14001 Hwy# 26,East. Business Address Newberry,Flordia 32669 Mike Mobbs Contact Person Sec/Tres. 1-800-342-3409 Title Phone # Attest: CITY OF PUNTA GORDA FORMAL BID #METERS031299 c xl„b.t i� P"5 `' D F > Page 17 PART n" '.. COST PROPOSAL FOR _ PURCHASE OF DISPLACEMENT WATER METERS FORMAT. BID #METERS031299 CLTY OF PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA 1 Having read thoroughly the context of this bid package, our firm is offering the following cost proposal. Our cost proposal consists of a total delivered price to the City, inclusive of any freight, surcharges, and any other miscellaneous incidental charges. 2 BID SCHEDULE: Please state your fine s cost proposal, manufacturer and model number for the meter sizes listed below: ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QTY. MFG/ MODEL UNIT PRICE PRICE EXTENDED UOM A. 5/8"x3/4" 500EA SchlUM12 er T-10$ 25.00 $ 12,500.00 B. 1" 225EA Schlumberger T-10$ 66.00 $ 14,850.00 C. 1'h° 300EA Schlumberger T-10$160.00 $ 48,000.00 D. 2" 50 EA Schlumberger T-10$. 38.00 $ 11, 900.00 TOTAL UNIT PRICE ITEM #2 (A-D), $ 489. 00 0 TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE ITEM 02 (A-D) $ 87,250.00 =�= 3 Please state the discount from list price for items not specified in the bid schedule: 15 % The City reserves the right to purchase items not listed in the bid schedule at the above discount, as required. 4 Please state your firm's cost proposal for the trade-in prices for obsolete meters. Estimated quantities given are based on prior years trade-in quantities. ITEM DESCRIPTION A. 5/8" x 3/4" B. 1" C. 1 '/2" D. 2" E. 3" F. 4" G. 6" EST. CITY 300 EA 200 EA 200 EA 33 EA 1 EA 1 EA 1 EA UNIT PRICE Trade-in $ 2.35 $ 5.00 $ 9.00 $ 11.00 $ 20.00 $ 30.D0 $ 40.00 EXTENDED PRICE $ 705.00 $1,000.00 C�1,800.00 363.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 TOTAL UNIT PRICE ITEM 93 (A-G) $ 117. 35 TOTAL EXTENDED PRICE ITEM #3 (A-G) $ 3 , 9 5 8 . 0 0 40'0 CITY OF PUNTA GORDA Page 18 FORMAL BID #METERS031299 t,. b r 3 rc!5�3cFS SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY,INC. 5 Hlease state the following: 5.1 Maximum increase tentage for second year of the initial coy,,dct: 3 5.2 Paymentterms* NET 30 DAYS — 5.3 Firm delivery schedule: 30 calendar days after receipt of an order. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME INFORMATION A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section.287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. I, N.A. Ellenbur being an authorized representative of the firm of SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY, INC. , located at 14001 Hwy;# 26 East City: Newberry State: I1. Zip: 32669 have read and understand the contents of the above. Signature: 39- - Date: march 2,1999 Phone: 1-800-3.42-3409 Fax Number: 352-332-5604 Federal I.D. # 59-2001285 CITY OF PUNTA GORDA FORMAL BID #METERS031299 Page 19 rA<'-b:f P°5' °1 cc 5 2.8 The City of Punta Gorda reserves the right to split bids based on the lowest responsive bid specific to each meter size, a1^4 upon the best trade-in allowance offered `-, each respective size obsolete meter. Concur X Variance 2.9 The designated pick-up location of obsolete water meters will be the same address of deliveries. Concur X Variance 3 WATER METER TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 3.1 This portion of the bid is related to the specifications pertinent to the nutating displacement water meters. Ratings must conform to AWWA C700 Standards. Concur X Variance 3.2 All meters furnished shall be of new and current production from the manufacturer, with a minimum of five (5) years meter production service. Meters will be designed and constructed for use in the service intended, with minimal maintenance required. Meters must be proven by past performance; experimental or untried meters will not be accepted. All meters shall be manufactured in compliance with all Federal, State, local laws and regulations. Concur X Variance 3.3 The size, capacity and meter lengths shall be as specified in AW WA Standard C700- latest revision. Concur X Variance 3.4 The following are the specifications for the laying length, normal test flow (GPM) and minimum test flow requirements for the specified sizes given. Size 5/8" x 3/4" 1" 1 'A" 2" Laying Length 7'/2" 10 3/4" 12 518" 15 1.14" Normal Test 1 - 20 3 - 50 5 - 100 8 -160 Flow (GPM) % 98.5-101.5 98.5-101.5 93.5-101.5 98.5-101.5 Minimum Test Flow 1/4 GPM 3/4 GPM 1 '/2 GPM 2 GPM %, 95-101 95-101 95-101 95-101 Concur X Variance (With all specifications given in item 3.4) 3.5 Meters will be magnetic drive type, insulated from the effects of exterior magnetic field. Meters will be of bronze construction and capable of withstanding a working pressure of 150 PSI, Concur X Variance CITY OF PUNTA GORDA FORMAL BID #METERS031299 SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY,INC. Page 13 G xii.6i� �— oa52 1 cF L1 3.6 The register shall be of the -,"eight reading type indicating U.S. gallon, ind permanently sealed in a plastic enclosure with a hig%wAuality glass lens. Concur X Variance — Please describe design of the glass lens: Impact— resistant with flat glass for legibility. 3.7 Registers are to have lids and register cover screw heads will bed rilled and factory sealed and/or shall have a temper proof screw for theft protection. The manufacture's serial number and name will be stamped or molded on the lid and meter body. Concur X Variance 3.8 The cast bronze main case will be corrosion resistant. The main case shall resist internal pressure stresses and external damage and will handle in -line piping variations and stresses. The main case bottom shall be of cast bronze construction. Concur X Variance 3.9 The nutating disc measuring chamber will be that of positive displacement and corrosion resistant. Concur X Variance 3.10 All 1 ''Y2" meters are to have female iron pipe threaded ends. The 518" x 3/4" and 1" main case connections shall be meter casing spuds having external straight threads conforming to ANSI B2.1. Concur X Variance 3.11 All meters shall be tested prior to delivery. Test cards will be provided for each meter. The meter serial number will be clearly printed on the test cards. Concur X Variance 4 TRADE-IN (OBSOLETE METERS) ALLOWANCE SPECIFICATIONS 4.1 During the awarded contract period, the City will have available for trade-in various sizes of used meters, which are of no further use to the City. The City is requesting your proposal for a trade-in allowance of used meters owned by the City. Concur X Variance 4.2 The elected vendor is to furnish the City with shipping crates for the packaging of used meters to be sent to the vendor. These crates are to be constructed of wood and have the ability to be moved by a forklift. It is the responsibility of the elected vendor to furnish all shipping crates, at no expense to the City. Concur X Variance SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY,INC. CITY OF PUNTA GORDA FORMAL BID #METERS031299 Page 14 4.3 The crates supplied by the vendor are not to be drums, half drums or be in a dilapidated or poor condition; all ces received in this condition will be r ped to the vendor at no cost to the City. Concur X Variance 5 All bidder's must submit with their response two (2) complete sets of literatures or descriptive data an the meters proposed. Failure to do so may result in deeming the bid response non -responsive. Concur X Variance 6 VARIANCES Explain in detail any variance to the above specifications: None CITY OF PUNTA GORDA FORMAL BID #METERS031299 Page 15 �ci Sil �l Or Li v ..9 AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Utilities Department C-7-B DATE: March 27,2001 REGULAR [ l PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: William R. Blazak SUBJECT: Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities and to form a cooperative entity better able to manage and make efficient use of resources related to the Utility Industry. The initial funding by all parties involved will be $ 10,000.00 each. FUNDS AVAIL: 471-1300-534000-100 $1,200.00 441-1300-534000-100 $4,600.00 451-1300-534000-100 $4,200.00 PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities and the funding in the amount of $10,000.00 consistent with all of the participants. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [X ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney:X �./ " Mgt. 6 Budget: Originating Dept:X .� l Other: Finance Director:(C eck for Cbpy only, if applicable)_ Purchasing : Other: Eff. 5/96 %W DOARD OF COUNT` COMMISSIONERS MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners %yea FROM: William Blazak, Utility Director DATE: March 27, 2001 ..r UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILLIAM DLAZAK DIRECTOR RE: Treasure Coast Regional Utilities - Memorandum of Understanding BACKGROUND: In October of 2000 the utility directors from Martin County, St. Lucie County, City of Port St. Lucie, City of Stuart and Fort Pierce Utility Authority met collectively to resolve issues with the Department of Environmental Protection. During the meeting it was discussed that the group should meet on a regular basis to deal with utility operations and common problems that we all face with the operation of a utility system. It was also decided that South Martin County Regional Utilities (Jupiter Island) and Okeechobee Utilities be invited as part of the group. The Treasure Coast Regional Utilities identified early in the group meetings that the first goal would be to develop a legal entity that could seek grants, state or federal, and through the consolidation of individual services, provide efficiency to all of the utility operations involved. The Memorandum of Understanding will allow for all of the participants to fund the cooperative entity and begin the process of developing an Interlocal Agreement. In addition, a Request for Proposals will be developed for the purpose of selecting an engineer to perform a feasibility study for the siting and construction of a Class "A" sludge facility. The intent of the group is to construct a sludge facility that will be shared by all the participants and eliminate the land application of sludge that is produced by all of our respective facilities. The sludge facility will be the first order of business for the group's future projects could include a centralized laboratory and warehouse for municipal supplies. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities and the initial funding in the amount of $10,000.00 consistent with all of the participants. JOHN D. BRUHN, District No. 1 • DOUG COWARD, District No. 2 • PAULA A. LEWIS, District No. B • FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No. 4 • CLIFF BARNES, District No. 5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson ?inn Virninio Avenue • For Pierce, FL 34982 • Phone (561) 462-1150 1 FAX (561) 462-1153 A%W "J MISSION STATEMENT The Boards of County Commissioners of Martin and St. Lucie Counties, Cities of Stuart and Port St. Lucie, the Town of Jupiter Island, and the Utility Authorities of Fort Pierce and Okeechobee desire to join together to provide safe, reliable drinking water and proper wastewater collection and treatment for all customers of our respective utilities. To participate in a cooperative effort to develop, and implement coordinated management programs to make most efficient use of our expenditures and provide necessary utility services. The members will exercise their privileges under Florida Statutes to pool purchasing power, on the basis of mutual advantage, to provide and obtain efficient, effective services such as biosolids disposal and laboratory analysis. . , NIENMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDS—ii G TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILrMS THIS NIENIORANI DUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES, is made and entered into this _ day of March 2601 among the County of Martin, the County of St. Lucie, the City of Stuart, the Utility Authority of Fort Pierce, the Utility Authority of Okeechobee, and the Town of Jupiter Island, all of whom are collectively hereinafter referred to as the "MOU Participants". WFi�REAS, the MOU Participants wish to pool their resources in order to form a Treasure Coast Regional Utilities organization dedicated to issues related to wastewater biosohds and other matters as the parties may otherwise agree; WHEREAS, the MOU Participants recognize that the needs of their respective jurisdictions with regard to wastewater biosolids can best be met by forming a cooperative entity better able to manage and make eflicient use of their individual resources; WHEREAS, the MOU Participants will continue to retain full authority to individually operate their own utility facilities without interference from the other participants; NOW TIERFFORE, the parties to this Memoratndum ofUnderstanding Regarding Treasure Coast Utilities agree as follows: 1. EWose Each party agrees to participate in the exploration and creation of a Treasure Coast Regional Utilities organization for purposes of dealing with their mutual needs relaxed to wastewater biosolids and such other purposes as may later be agreed upon by the participants. in order to form a Treasure Coast Regional Utilities organization MMORANIDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTi'MMS PAGE 1 `%.r •/ pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the MOU Participants recognize the need to hire independent outside professionals free from conflicts of interest as a result of any contractual or employment relationship with any of the individual members. Thus, the MOU participants agree to share in the fimdmg and other efforts required to retain the necessary legal and technical expertise to aid in the legal creation of the organization. The MOU Participants shall work together over the next 12 months to facilitate the creation of an Interlocal Agreement creating a Treasure Coast Regional Utilities organization and specifically detailing the scope of membership, funding, purposes and all other relevant technical and legal matters. Nothing herein, however, will preclude the individual MOU participants from later rejecting membership in such organization. However, it is the goal of the MOU Participants to gain the desired consensus such that the organization ultimately created contains membership by all. 2. Funding Each party agrees to pay ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) each in order to fund the initial creation of the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities organization. The money shall be held in trust by 1 0e C NTH D F 5TUA (tr(MOU Trustee) for payment of the expenses related to the creation of the organization, including but not limited to legal fees, meeting expenses, and consulting services until such time as a formal Inter -local Agreement is adopted by all of the members. Such Interlocal Agreement will then govern funding issues into the future. Any funds remaining shall be rolled over into the budget of the new organization or refimded to the MOU participants, whichever is deemed acceptable by a majority of the MOU Participants at such time. The MOU Participants shall enact basic guidelines with the aid of legal counsel at the first formal meeting after signing this MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTAPIDP G RUGAEMI NG TREASURE COAST UGt®1NAL UTU,n S PAGE 2 `. ..i agreement by all MOU Participants for purposes of guiding the expenditures of funds held by the MOU Trustee. 3. Vithdrawal Any party may withdraw from participation under this agreement at any time prior to formation of the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities organization. However, the funds remitted by the withdrawing participant, as described in Paragraph 2 above and held by the MOU Trustee, will be not be refimded to the withdrawing participant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands and seals as of the day and year above first written. Approved by: Approved by: MARTIN COUNTY By: ATTEST: DATE: ST. LUCIE COUNTY By: ATTEST: DATE: Oy UNDERSTANDING REGARDING TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES PAGE %W Approved by: Approved by: Approved by: CITY OF STUART By: ATTEST: DATE: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE By: ATTEST: DATE: FORT PIERCE UTILITY AUTHORITY By: ATTEST: DATE: OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY ATTEST: DATE: Approved by: NEEdIORANDIJM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES PAGE 4 '"d TOWN OF JUPITER aSLAND 0 Approved by - �I� MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES PAGE 5 DEPARTMENT: Utilities ACCOUNT NUMBER TO: 471-1300-534000-100 ACCOUNT NAME Other Contractual Services DATE: sh 20 AMOUNT $1,200 2001 BALANCE VERIFY $0 441-1300-534000-100 Other Contractual Services $4,600 $0 451-1300-534000-100 Other Contractual Services $4,200 $0 From: 471-9910-599300-800 Reserves $1,200 $244779 441-9910-599300-800 Reserves $4,600 $1,104,357 451-9910-599300-800 Reserves $4 200 $433 762 REASON FOR TRANSFER: Funding for the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities CONTACT PERSON: DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: ADMINISTRATION APPROVAL: Heather Renella; i; l�' ` '�.i—, U PHONE M 462-1150 OMB NOTES: APPROVAL DATE: LINE -TO -LINE TRANSFER #: INPUT BY: DOCUMENT #: OMB:QP/GENERAUFORMS/TRANSFER Eff. 10/01/95 AGENDA REQUE& ITEM NO-C_ga DATE: March 27, 2001 CONSENT [X] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi -JD. I ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 7epa ED BYent Head SUBMITTED BY (DEPT):Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 SUBJECT: Approval to proceed to activate Foreign Trade Zone 218 by utilizing the maintenance building located at 2858 Curtis King Boulevard at the St. Lucie International Airport. The building is approximately 1000 square feet, located close to U.S. Customs. The Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 was formed in October of 1996. Pursuant to federal regulations the zone must be activated within 5 years or the activation privilege will be revoked. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A On March 14, 2001 the Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone Board #218 unanimously approved utilizing the maintenance building at the St. Lucie International Airport to activate the zone. On December 18, 2000, the Foreign Trade Zone Board aproved authorizing consultant Tommy Berry of KPMG to begin the process to activate the zone; a contract has since been executed for this task. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to utilize the maintenance building at the St. Lucie International Airport to activate FTZ 218. COMMISSION ACTION: [ X ] APPROVED [ [ ] OTHER: .YCounty Attorney: V Originating Dept Finance: (copies only): GONGDENIED Douglas Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Mgt a Budget Other: Purchasing: Other: E". 11/4/93 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commission FROM: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director DATE: March 19, 2001 SUBJECT: Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 The Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 was established in October of 1996. During the course of its existing the Economic Development Division of St. Lucie County has aggressively marketed the zone. According the federal law the zone must be activated within 5 years. In October, 2001 the zone designation will expire. Therefore, the Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone Board voted unanimously on March 14, 2001 to activate the maintenance building at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The address of the maintenance building is 2858 Curtis King Boulevard, Fort Pierce, Florida. The building is approsimately 1000 square feet and is located in close proximity to U. S. Customs. The activation of the maintenance building will ensure that St. Lucie County continues to have its Foreign Trade Zone. It will also encourage companies to use the zone as an existing building will be activated for use. SU T D: n Ju is Shewchuk, Director AGENDA REQUESIMI� ITEM NOC-8b DATE: March 27, 2001 CONSENT [X] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Log. [ ] Quasi -JD. [ ) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRES�•/ D artment Head SUBMITTED BY (DEPT):Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 SUBJECT: Approval to replace Jack Crahan as a Board Member of the Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 with Rudy Howard, and approval to retain Dewitt Beckett as a Board Member. BACKGROUND: The Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 consist of five (5) Board Members. After serving several terms Jack Crahan has requested to be removed from serving another term. Dewitt Beckett bas requested to be retained for another term as a Board Member. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On March 14, 2001 the Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone Board #218 unanimously approved the nomination of Rudy Howard to replace Jack Crahan as a Board Member. The Board also approved the retention of Dewitt Beckett. The St.Lucie County Board of County Commission first appointed Board members to the FTZ beginning in 1996 with the establishment of the Foreign Trade Zone. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving Rudy Howard and Dewitt Beckett to the Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 Board of Directors. COMMISSION ACTION: [ X I APPROVED I ] [ ] OTHER: *County Attorney: a Originating Dept: Finance. (copies only): CONCU CE: DENIED Douglas Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Kgt 4 Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: r . 11/l/93 AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO C-8b DATE: March 27, 2001 CONSENT [X] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi -JD. [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS P;Dartmen NTE BY,g1/J t Head SUBMITTED BY (DEPT):Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 SUBJECT: Approval to replace Jack Crahan as a Board Member of the Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 with Rudy Howard, and approval to retain Dewitt Beckett as a Board Member. BACKGROUND: The Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 consist of five (5) Board Members. After serving several terms Jack Crahan has requested to be removed from serving another term. Dewitt Beckett has requested to be retained for another term as a Board Member. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On March 14, 2001 the Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone Board #218 unanimously approved the nomination of Rudy Howard to replace Jack Crahan as a Board Member. The Board also approved the retention of Dewitt Beckett. The St.Lucie County Board of County Commission first appointed Board members to the FTZ beginning in 1996 with the establishment of the Foreign Trade Zone. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recosmnends approving Rudy Howard and Dewitt Beckett to the Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 Board of Directors. COMMISSION ACTION: [X ] APPROVED [ [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Originating Dept Finance: (copies only): CONCURRENCE: ] DENIED Douglas Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Mgt & Budget Other: Purchasing: Other: ElP. 11/t193 %W. V .o MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commission FROM: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director DATE: March 19, 2001 SUBJECT: Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 The Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone 218 was established in October of 1996. After serving several terms Jack Crahan has requested to be removed from serving another term. Dewitt Beckett has requested to be retained for another term as a Board Member. On March 14, 2001, the Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone Board #218, unanimously approved the nomination of Rudy Howard to replace Jack Crahan as a Board Member. The Board also approved the retention of Dewitt Beckett. The St. Lucie County Board of County Commission first appointed Board members to the FTZ beginning in 1996 with the establishment of the Foreign Trade Zone. ITEM NO. LEC, DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING [ l Leg. [ ] Quasi -JD. [ ] CONSENT [XI TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Community mi7� unity Develo mn ent— muty Development Dir. SUBTFCT: Approve Resolution No.01-014 Urging the Acquisition and Restoration Council to Continue Funding for the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Project Lands Under the Florida Forever Program BACKGROUND_ The North Fork of the St. Lucie River project is a priority under the County's Environmentally Significant Lands project that has been funded through the Preservation 2000 Conservation and Recreation Lands program The North Fork St. Lucie River project is currently ranked No.12 on the CARL Bargain/Shared acquisition list. Future funding for the purchase of lands within the project will be provided from the Florida Forever program if the project is selected for funding by the Land Acquisition and Restoration Council on April 6, 2001. FUNDS AVAIL. Funding is available in the ESL bond fund (382-3915-599330-300). PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board approved the Multi -Party Agreement on February 10, 1998. The Board approved the CARL NFSLR boundary modification on November 23, 1999. EECOMMFNDATION: Approved Resolution No. 01-014 Urging the Acquisition and Restoration Council to Continue funding for the North Fork St. Lucie River project under the Florida Forever Program [ �9 APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: i� County Alto « �Z Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Review and &Dmvals M.S..t & ocigivn gDepe,hmt: F,..: (Check f. Copy only, it VPli-ble) rr 1./ COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: March 27, 2001 • MEMORANDUM r i za: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board o FROM: DATE: Mar& 21, 2001 SUBJECT: Approve Resolution No. 01 -014 Urging the Acquisition and Restoration Council to Continue Funding for the North Fork St -Lucie River Bargain/Shared Project under the Florida Forever Program The North Fork of the St. Lucie River is a priority acquisition project of the County's Environmentally Significant Lands Program To ensure future funding for the purchase of lands within the North Fork St. Lucie River Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) project the North Fork St. Lucie River project must be on the "A" list of lands selected by Land Acquisition Restoration Council (Council) for funding under the Florida Forever program. The Council will hold a public hearing on April 6, 2001 to re-evaluate existing CARL projects and select CARL projects for funding. Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Resolution No 01-014. Please let us know if you have any questions. Julia Shewchuk - v ./ 1 I RESOLUTION NO. 01- 014 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD, OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 4 OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, URGING THE ACQUISITION AND 5 RESTORATION COUNCIL TO CONTINUE FUNDING FOR THE 6 NORTH FORK OF THE ST. LUCIE RIVER BARGAIN/SHARE PROJECT 7 8 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the 9 following determinations: 10 11 1. On December 28, 1994, the Board of Trustees of the Internal 12 Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida for the Department of 13 Environmental Protection, Division of State Lands, purchased 981 acres 14 of land along the North Fork of the St. Lucie River that are managed as 15 part of the North Fork St. Lucie River State Buffer Preserve. 16 17 2. On November 8, 1994, the voters of St. Lucie County approved a Twenty 18 Million ($20,000,000.00) Dollar Bond Issue for the purpose of acquiring 19 environmentally sensitive lands. 20 21 3. On January 15, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners entered into the 22 "Acquisition and Ownership Agreement North Fork/St. Lucie CARL Project' with 23 the Department of Environmental Protection and South Florida Water 24 Management District. As part of the agreement the Department pledged to 25 provide Fifty percent of the costs to acquire lands within the CARL project 26 boundary and the County pledged to provide up to Two Million Two Hundred and 27 Fifty Thousand ($2,250,000.00) Dollars of the purchase price for the North Fork 28 Project lands. 29 30 4. The North Fork St. Lucie River Project is ranked number 12 on the 2000 31 Conservation and Recreation Lands Bargain/Shared list. 32 33 5. The lands proposed for acquisition are either adjacent to or surrounded by 34 1,724 acres already owned by the State of Florida, the South Florida Water 35 Management District or St. Lucie County and make up the integrated North Fork 36 Greenway. 37 38 6. Purchase of the remaining North Fork of the St. Lucie River CARL Project lands 39 will further the intent of the Florida Forever Act and contribute to the 40 achievement of 13 of the 19 goals set fortiri`259.105(4)(a) of the Florida 41 Statutes. I Page 1 North Fork of the St. Lucie River .Resolution 01- Bargain/Share CARL Project 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. 2 Lucie County, Florida: 3 4 A. This Board urges the Acquisition and Restoration Council to continue funding for 5 the North Fork St. Lucie River Project under the Florida Forever program. 6 7 B. The County Administrator is hereby directed to send a copy of this resolution to 8 the members of the Acquisition and Restoration Council. 9 10 After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: 11 12 Chairman Frannie Hutchinson XXX 13 14 Vice -Chairman Doug Coward XXX 15 16 Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX 17 18 Commissioner Paula Lewis XXX 19 20 Commissioner John Bruhn XXX 21 22 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 27th day of March, 2001. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ATTEST: 37 38 39 40 41 DEPUTY CLERK 42 4� Page 2 Resolution 01- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY 2 North Fork of the St. Lucie River Bargain/Share CARL Project AGENDA REQUEST ITEM No: C-9 DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ym] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Susan Kilmer SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Library SUBJECT: St. Lucie West Library - Contracted Services BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County has been a partner with Indian River Community College and Florida Atlantic University to provide Branch Library services in the St. Lucie West community since 1995. The funds for this endeavor are allocatted within the Library's special account derived from State Aid to Libraries grant funding. Cost for this contract in FY2000-2001 is $85,424 FUNDS AVAIL. 105-7115-534000-7950 Contracted Services PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board of County Commissioners entered into an agreement with Indian River Community College to provide public library service in St. Lucie West. These services have been onggoingg since 1995. Contract #C95-08-592 r E COMME NDAT I017 : Staff recommends approval of expenditure of $85,424 for contracted services through Indian River Community College for the St. Lucie West Library and authorize County Administrator to sign Purchasing requisition for payment of services. COI-DIISSION ACTION: [X ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ j OTHER: Rev i Ei+ and F.n2 jH0 -1 '.D L'P.LV ALiorne}': XXMQL. u cJ Ud•]EL: S` ./. XX �.g beDL.y�J/�, O:her: _cr.E rce: (Chsck for copy oalv, if applicable) CONCURRENCE: Doug Anderson, County Administrator =UrC :d3_ OLhar: `o MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY LIBRARY TO: Board of County Commissioners I � d FROM: Susan Kilmer, Library Director av�^-�-� "° "� =" DATE: March 20, 2001 SUBJECT: St. Lucie West Library Cooperative ****************************************************************************** The Board of County Commissioners entered into an interlocal agreement with Indian River Community College in 1995 to provide Library services in a bra cusage capacity t beith students from St. Lucie West Campus of IRCC. The St. Lucie West Library is a three (3) y agefacility vv Indian River Community College, Florida Atlantic University and the general public having access to all of the technology and collections available through this site. The Library Department, through the State Aid to Libraries grant, provides funding for two full-time staff and operational funds on an annual basis. This fiscal year the amount agreed upon to provide these services is $85,424 which is paid directly to Indian River Community College. The library also provides a rental collection, reference books, subscriptions and communication costs at a price of $31,700 which the library pays directly to the vendors. This cooperative venture has been a win -win endeavor for the residents of St. Lucie County, with the access to advanced technology, on -site computer training; and a diverse collection of materials for the use of the general populace. The statistics over the last few years have shown that the greatest use of this facility does come from the general population - so for the money spent the County is getting an excellent return. Indian River Community College and Florida Atlantic University will be moving into a new facility in 2002 as part of their 2 + 2 campus with the library being one of the three new buildings currently under construction. We look forward to our continued cooperative library service in this community. Salaries & benefits Books* Subscriptions* Communications* Operating expenses St. Lucie West Library Budget 2000-2001 $ 67,424 27,000 3,200 1,500 18,000 $117,124 All funding for St. Lucie West Library comes from State Aid * These items are paid through the Library for St. Lucie West, remaining items are paid directly to Indian River Community College ($85,424) AGREEMENT between INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE and ST. LUCIE COUNTY relating to THE PROVISION OF LIBRARY SERVICES AT ST. LUCIE WEST This Interlocal Agreement is made by and between the DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES of INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, (hereinafter referred to as "Trustees") and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "County") to provide a joint use library. WHEREAS, Trustees own real property including a 10,000 square foot library building at the St. Lucie West Campus; and, WHEREAS, it is Trustee's desire to provide full library facilities for its students and faculty at the St. Lucie West Campus; and, WHEREAS, it is County's desire to provide branch library services in the St. Lucie West area as part of the St. Lucie County Public Library System; and, WHEREAS, the parties hereto have determined that it would be to the mutual advantage of each and in the best interest of both the citizens of St. Lucie County and the faculty, staff, and students of Indian River Community College to provide for the joint use of library facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual advantages accruing to the parties and the benefits, promises, and considerations hereinafter set out, Trustees and County agree as follows: I. PURPOSE AND INTENT Trustees and County wish to maximize the use of their respective resources and to provide state -of the -art information services for the students and faculty of Indian River Community College and the residents of St. Lucie County. It is further the intent of the parties: A To provide high quality library services to the public at large and to the faculty and students of the College. B. To maximize the use of funds and facilities for libraries and avoid unnecessary duplication of facilities and services. C. To jointly provide programs and facilities that are better than either entity could provide on its own. D. To further the relationship between College and the community. E. To provide students and faculty of the College with access to the larger holdings of the Library. F. To provide the citizens of St. Lucie County with access to the electronic resources of the College. IL ROLE OF THE PARTIES '{ In consideration of mutual covenants and promises herein contained, Trustees and County agree as follows: 2 I%W .., A. County agrees to provide funds to Trustees in the amount of $118,939 for the purchase of equipment, shelving, books, subscriptions, audiovisual resources, supplies, utilities, and support one full-time staff position including benefits. The 1994-1995 budget to accomplish these ends is attached and hereto referred to as Exhibit A. For fiscal year 1995-96, County agrees to provide funds to Trustees in the amount of $50,000 for the purchase of books, subscriptions, audiovisual resources, supplies, utilities, and additional funding to support one full-time staff position including benefits. B. For future fiscal years, the parties agree to meet on or before February 1 of each fiscal year beginning February 1, 1996 to confer and develop a proposed operating budget. Trustees agree to provide County within ninety (90) days following the end of each fiscal year evidence of expended funds provided and receipts supporting those expenditures. C. County agrees that the responsibility for the administration of the shared resources center rests with the College's Learning Resources Director. D. County and Trustees agree that a joint liaison committee will be established consisting of representatives of the two institutions to examine the shared resources operation and advise the Director on budget, acquisitions, and other aspects of the joint use library operation. E. Trustees agree that equipment and maintenance thereof will be the 4 responsibility of the Trustees except that County will be responsible for the SIRSI on-line catalog terminals and peripherals. 3 F. Trustees agree to inventory and advise County of any and all library materials, equipment and furnishing purchased with County funds. Trustees agree that County will control the selection and purchase of books and materials by County for the library. G. Trustees will house within existing library facility mutually agreed upon collections or newly purchased library materials that County deems necessary to support the residents of County. H. Trustees and County agree to provide reciprocal borrowing for residents of St. Lucie County and the faculty and students of the College. I. Trustees agree to circulate County's library materials on County's circulation system. J. Trustees agree to provide County access to the College's electronic resources. K. Trustees and County will mutually agree upon a wiring infrastructure that will accommodate the library automation systems in use at the St. Lucie West library facility. L. Trustees agree to be responsible for damages to County's designated equipment and to give proper notification to County when equipment needs normal maintenance or basic service occurring during the periods County's designated equipment is used by Trustees. 9 r M. When fully operational, Trustees agree to open the library for public use during the following minimum hours: Monday through Friday 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.; two nights each week until 8:00 p.m. and from 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. on each Saturday. N. In the event of discontinuance of funding by the Florida Legislature in subsequent years, or the termination of this contract, the SIRSI library system and rental book collection shall revert to County. All other items shall become the property of Trustees. 0. County agrees that Florida Atlantic University will participate in the shared resources center. All parties participating agree to the conditions necessary to maximize access to the information resources provided by each institution. III. TERM: TERMINATION This Agreement shall be effective for a period of twenty (20) years beginning July 1, 1995; provided, however, that either party may elect to terminate the agreement with or without cause on 120 days written notice of said termination. Funds involved in said agreement shall be prorated through the date of termination. IV. AMENDMENT This agreement may be amended by written agreement of the parties. V. NOTICES All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing (including telex and telegraphic �i communication) and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered 5 v by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed (airmail if international) by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested, and addressed to: As to St. Lucie County: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 As to Trustees President Indian River Community College 3209 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5596 With a copy to: St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 V1bth a copy to: IRCC Board of Trustees Attorney 311 South Second Street Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered: (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date telecommunicated if by telegraph, (c) on the date of transmission with confirmed answer back if by telex, and (d) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. VI. AUDIT The parties agrees that either party or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of five (5) years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the other party involving transactions related to this Agreement. N i✓ r tf VII. PUBLIC RECORDS The parties shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other materials subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by either party in conjunction with this Agreement. Vlll. ASSIGNMENT No party shall assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm without first obtaining the non assigning parties' approval. IX. WHOLE UNDERSTANDING This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous communications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized officials as of the date aforesaid. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY: Qj:�Wo DEPU _• RK-; AIRMAN j APPROVE AS TO FORM AND CORR CTNESS ... _ BY: COUNTY A O NEY 7 *A0 ATTEST: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY:� EDWIN R. WASSEY PRESIDENT APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS BY: ATTO Y s AGENDA REQUEST "� Inuestment for the Future ITEM NO. C-10 DATE March 27,2001 REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING Ruth Totton SUBJECT: Award of Bid #01-022 Roof Replacements, BACKGROUND: On February 14, 2001 bids were received for roof replacement on various buildings. Four hundred fourteen venders were notified, thirty five sets of bid documents were distributed and five bids were received. There were a total of seven roof replacements. The low bidders and prices are listed on the attached memorandum from Central Services Projects Coordinator. FUNDS AVAIL.: As listed on the memorandum. PREVIOUS ACTION - Pulled from 3/20/01 RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends award of Bid #01-022 Roof Replacements to the bidders as listed on the attached memorandum. Authorize the chairman to sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION- CONCURRENCE: jx] APPROVED (j DENIED [ j OTHER: Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination signatures County Attorney: Mgt & BUCfgebK7b4 Purchasing Mgrx.iX Originating Dept'y Other: Other. Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eff. 1197 G:\COMMON\AGENDAS\BIDS\2001-022 award raofe.wpd 14W `%00 MEMORANDUM CENTRAL SERVICES TO: Ruth Totten, Interim Director, Purchasing FROM: Ken Hall, Projects Coordinator, Central Services DATE: March 13, 2001 SUBJECT: Roof Replacement -Bid #01-022 Empire I and Empire II EOC Rock Road Al, A2, A3, A4 and Hallway A Staff recommends the subject bid be awarded to the low bidder: Tom Tanenbaum, Inc. (Orlando) for the following: Roof Replacements Empire I and Empire II in the amount of: Empire I ............. $34,841.00 Empire H............ $25,868.00 Funds available..... 316-1931-546100-1524, Main. Improve. (Empire 1).......... $40,000.00 316-1931-546100-1519, Main. Improve. (Empire I1)......... $75,000.00 `p. E5 Ruth Totten Bid Recommendation #01-022 March 13, 2001 page 2 of 2 Staff also recommends awarding the following to the low bidder: The Roof Authority, Inc. for the following: Roof Replacements E.O.C. Rock Road Jail, Al, A2, A3, A4, Hallway A in the amount of: E.O. C........................$31,937.00 Rock Road (Al) ......... $50,609.00 Rock Road (A2)......... $50,609.00 Rock Road (A3) ......... $50,609.00 Rock Road (A4) ......... $25,000.00 Hallway A ..................$30,000.00 Funds available ............ 316-1931-546200-15008, Maint. Improve.(E.O.C.)........ $ 40,000.00 316-1940-546200-1527, Main. Improve. (Rock Road) ... $250,000.00 Please proceed with BCC approval. P VA OVA FORWR OAFA I V" � M/ "IIlI7 V41. ..s MEMORANDUM PURCHASING DEPARTMENT FROM: Ruth Totton, Interim Purchasing Director DATE: March 19, 2001 SUBJECT: Roof Replacements- Bid #01-022 Award of Bid Staff recommends that roof replacement for Empire I and Empire II be awarded to Tom Tanenbaum, Inc. low bidder in the amount of: Empire I ....$34,841.00 Empire H.... $25,868.00 Staff recommends that roof replacement for E.O.C. be awarded to : The Roof Authority, Inc. low bidder in the amount of: E.O.C...... $31,937.00 Staff recommends that roof replacement for Rock Road as a total be awarded to: The Roof Authority, Inc. low bidder in the total amount of :....... $206,827.00 ***Note: On addendum 1 all bidders were told that "Rock Road Jail —Pod A3 will be the main roof to bid . Others are alternates. Also, hallway A ". Pod Al ... $50,609.00 Pod A2... $50,609.00 Pod A3... $50,609.00 (Main roof) Pod A4... $25,000.00 Hallway A$30.000.00 $206,827.00 Over All Total for Rock Road G:\COMON\roo£ replace.t.wpd 0 3 0 z m 0 m IV m m v m D z v D n z c m m M 0 In v N z c 3 v m 0 m v v n c 3 m z -i N v M m c m v, z c m m M 0 O c D z N z O T m v, ,.r m W O O O O O O E C O v —i v 0 0 0 0 m m n r* 7 7 7 T. m 0 0 0O m r, 00 X v v v v ? W N to to Eo 40 -V► Eo 40 4o 40 ii m 0 0 N j 'C1m o 0 o m m m o W o M -4 m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 � •-< Eo Eo Ei► 40 EA Eo 400. f/► F!► 9 -n ;a 0 r M w w w A w 9O N _A V V V CO a;a0 z— CO V m CCOO W m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �D �z x o -n r 40 40 441, 40 4111� 4% wono ono w o m 9 0 m CDte1 _oNo W W 0cc) V N Cn D O Co 00 Cc ca 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn no r to to 60 to 40 40 ti► to to a -I -i CW tNt� N V N i cM V Z z c W co W O N N �.WP 00 CO am ch O O 0 0 00 -& r W 0 O O O O O O O O c z 0 y -n ;u z c o ?to Eo io io ti► 40 fo Eo O rn -n O W N W Cn V O V O V O W A .A m al w .P "W p Z Z 0 w m m W O 0 m O D F_� r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o me 0 2 0 0 ;a mZ0 O m ��m mmr m<m c m m >cnZ � D N M o O i C r i 0 i n o � D O w 77 r c. m v 00 C mv� c DO iO D OM zo s0 mm mn 1O �c vz v� 0 0 0 i C N3 no y N O z m m `pe ..r AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ADMINISTRATION ITEM NO. C 11 DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING[ ] CONSENT[X] PRESENTED BY: ROBERT BRADSHAW SUBJECT: RENTAL OF POSTAGE MACHINE FOR THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S BACKGROUND: The postage machine that the county now has is 12 years old, and needs to be replaced to continue operating the mail room in an efficient way. The postage machine we are now using is obsolete and costly. Pitney Bowes has an excellent rental program under State Contract for $667.00/per month or $4,669.00 for seven (7) months until the end of our fiscal year. See attached. FUNDS AVAIL.: FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN ACCOUNT 001-1900-544100-100 PREVIOUS ACTION: Pulled from 2/13/01 RECOMMENDATION: Staff request that the Board of County Commissioners approve the replacement Of the postage machine located in Humane Resources mail room. Budget Amendment BA01-125 COMMISSION ACTION: [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Att< Originating Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Coordination/Signatures b Mgt. & Budget: HR: CONCURRENCE: Doug Anderson County Administrator Purchasing Mgr.:, Other: Eff. 1197 n\Cnn n\AGENDAS\OTHER\Postage meter.wpd \r ..w MAIL MACHINE RENTAL VS PURCHASE 1.667/MO X 48 MO = $32,016 A. postal meter no charge B. no maintenance fee C. rate change plate no charge D no Postage reset fees E eams 2% free postage F budget per year $8,004.00 G can change out at anytime for newer machine H non appropriations of funds clause I county has the option to retain title of equipment after rental term Rental would cost us $32,016 at the end of four years 2% free postage could be $1,700 1. $18,763.(state of Florida Cont.) A. rental of postal meter $1122/yr x 4=$4488.00 B. annual maintenance $1892/yr x 4 = $7568.00 C. rate plate charge is $205.00 per change D. reset fee charged E. eams none F. budget all in one year G. in four years we will have an old machine Purchase after four years $30,819.00 You will still have to buy rate plates at $205/ea Also pay for reset fees. So Staff is recommending that the county go with a rental program for their new Paragon II Mail machine from Pity Bowes FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 FUNDS APPROVED FROM CONTINGENCY GENERAL FUND AMOUNT REMAINING: $697,170 DEPARTMENT ITEM ACCOUNT# AMOUNT DATE Approved Budget Contingency 001-9910-599100-800 1,000,000 Administration Community Redevelopment Agency (County portion) - 75,000 09112 Public Works Rock Road Chapel 001-1900-562011-16002 1,082 10/03 Central Services Smithsonian (Loans to fund 316) 001-1930-562000-76007 200,000 11/08 Veteran Services Van Loan for Veteran Services 001-5310-564000-500 22,079 01/16 Total used: 298,161 Balance Avallable 701,839 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST F....M REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING PREPARED DATE: 02/07/01 AGENDA DATE: 02/13/01 rr. - zaCCOUNT+NUMBER' y�`a y :. `AC�COl1NT.NAMEs ...� A OU Tom, TO: 001-1900-544100-100 EQUIPMENT RENTAL $4,669 FROM: 001-9910-599100-800 CONTINGENCY $4,669 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Transfer of funds to py for annual rental of new mail room postage machine that is located in Human Resources. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THISAMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: $701.839 $4,669 $697,170 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: , BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # $.INPUT BY: 01-125 - Ml IIV3FTr)I IATTRr)1r:FNFRAl 1FnRMSVAMFNDM01.wb3 - - - - -- - - *00 0 0 0 3 CD 0 cm ci G) D z x O m G) z G) O � �� n 3 r CD C/) 0 m 1 n :0. cn i CDCD o K c O CD D a' CD c cn o � C7 c0 >C.� � � m CD5. mo CD rn rn � on = CD cCL CD O CD r.+ • • • • S' G) -n 71 C .P o O S_ R4 - � �CL CD �� CD � °r CD CD CD n CDCD �� - c n a� c _,; O O O CD CC (n a �(n��C� 1 0 � 0 X % Cn CD CD CAD n CD O 0CD CD CD C CD O O C_ O a • G) w CD CD =- CD CD N m m cn m U) m CA O r c M4 too x MMI rn o m CD x-0 3 CQ< _. _. CD � � CD o oCD c M --ti CD O �- cQcnCCDD CD _. < O• = 0 � M�= BCD :3cn Cn v CCD 3cr �, w < CD =+ 3 : O CD CD CD CD c O 0 C �' CD O O � CD O_ ° 3 I< c m z m CO)M4 .0 O 0) O w CD O O O O N Z -69 ma m O O O O W m � O W CD O X O v E%% D m m N N —I 0o O W O m m ci 0 N rr O BOCC *400 PC REPLACEMENT v0# BUDGET IMPACT DATA FY02 GENERAL INTERNAL OTHER & PCs FUND ENTERPRISE SERVICE TAXES TOTALS OBSOLETE 104 8 17 61 190 REQUIRE UPGRADES 104 37 15 72 228 CURRENT 34 0 0 117 151 TOTALS 242 45 32 250 569 To Buy Replacement PCs for Obsolete General Fund $1350 x 104 = $140,400 Internal Service $1350 x 8 = $10.800 Enterprise $1350 x 17 = $22,950 Other & Taxes $1350 x 61 = $82,350 $256,500 To Lease Replacement PCs for Obsolete General Fund $600 x 104 = $62,400 Internal Service $600 x 8 = $4,800 Enterprise $600 x 17 = $10,200 Other & Taxes $600 x 61 = $36,600 $114,000 To Upgrade PCs General Fund $450 x 104 = $46,800 Internal Service $450 x 37 = $16,650 Enterprise $450 x 15 = $6,750 Other & Taxes $450 x 72 = $32,400 $102,600 To Lease Replacement PCs for Upgrades General Fund $600 x 104 = $62,400 Internal Service $600 x 37 = $22,200 Enterprise $600 x 15 = $9,000 Other & Taxes $600 x 72 = $43,200 TOTAL FY02 COSTS Buy and Upgrade General Fund $187,200 Internal Service $27,450 Enterprise $29,700 Other & Taxes $114,750 $359,100 $136,800 Lease $124,800 $27, 000 $19, 200 79 800 $250,800 %Vr To: Denise Demers From: Patti Lara Date: March 20, 2001 Re: Florida entities that are presently leasing 1. Florida Community College System, TRP (they did the RFP and awarded the contract) 2. Seminole Community College ( only school leasing under the Florida TRP award) 3. State of Florida, Office of the Treasurer 4. State of Florida, Department of Transportation 5. Alachua County, Florida 6. American Red Cross of Tampa Bay 7. City of Lake Mary ($9,000 - Equipment has not shipped yet, but they did sign the lease. ) 1 ,%W ../ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C12 Packages Phase UnDATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR( ) PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT(x) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Phill Brodeur Assistant Director SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Infonnation Technology SUBJECT: Approve the attached Personal Computer and Server Replenishment program and authorize staff to negotiate a lease/purchase program for replacing the outdated personal computers and network servers over the next three/four years. BACKGROUND: The Personal Computer and Server Replenishment project is required to implement a replacement program over three years to phase out obsolete personal computer and server equipment. The current personal computers are not capable of supporting the new Windows 2000 operating system software and SCT Banner upgrades. Additionally, many departments utilize specialized software that their existing personal computers will not handle. After evaluating all the major personal computer platforms, Information Technology has determined that Dell and/or Gateway proposed the most cost effective solution that meets or exceeds the county needs. Among other things, the proposed personal computer solution will provide the county with a full warranty on all equipment for the life of the lease, hardware standardization, maintenance reimbursements, and lower total cost of ownership. The Dell and/or Gateway computer equipment is available under several State of Florida leasing contracts. Many other counties in Florida, as well as the entire Florida Community College system already are utilizing the same proven methodology with these vendors. Information Technology reviewed the proposed Dell and Gateway solutions and acknowledged their ability to provide computer equipment which meets the county standards, while reducing recurring costs of maintenance and upgrades. Note: This program is similar to the vehicle replacement program the county initiated to replace worn out vehicles. ft FUNDS AVAIL: The estimated breakdown for the various funding sources is as follows: 208 General Funded Dept. P.C's = $124,800 45 ' Internal Service Funded Dept. P.C.'s = $27,000 32 ' Enterprise Funded Dept. P.C.'s = $19,200 133 Permit Fees, Gas Taxes, 911 Fee, & Other Tax Funded Dept. P.C.'s = $79,800 418 Total units at $250,800 estimated program costs. ..d The Personal Computer replenishment program can be funded within the various departments allocations for Information Technology services or general funded if the County Commission so desires. The funds can be included in the departments projections that they will budget for FY02. The lease program will be implemented in FY01 for those departments who currently have funds available and paid for annually over the next three/four years. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Information Technology and Strategic Management Team recommended the critical need for this program to the Board of County Commissioners at the Strategic Planning workshop held recently at the Environment Learning Center. The Citizens Budget Committee unanimously approved the P.C. Lease Plan at their March 16, 2001 meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the Personal Computer and Server Replenishment Program and authorize staff to negotiate and bring back an agreement for the Board's consideration. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: (g ) APPROVED ( ) DENIED ( ) OTHER i Z, Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals �� County Attorney: Management & Budget: Purchasing Originating Dept:_ -Other: 0 ..r ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 AGENDA March 27, 2001 MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held March 13, 2001. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 24 and No. 25 MOSQUITO CONTROL Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. C99-03-331 with Florida Rock Industries, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the amendment to provide the District with Coquina Rock at $3.50 per ton, and authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment. r NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, Individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. %w ..r 03/23/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #25- 17-MAR-2001 TO 23-MAR-2001 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND TITLE EXPENSES 145 Mosquito Fund 4,276.07 GRAND TOTAL: 4,276.07 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 %W ,%IV AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-,L DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR I I PUBLIC HEARING [ I CONSENT [XI TO: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Mosquito Control James R. David SUBJECT: Amendment No. I to Contract C99-03-331 with Florida Rock Industries, Inc. BACKGROUND: The County originally entered into a contract with Florida Rock Industries, Inc. in 1996. The County contract was piggy -backed by the District in 1999, along with the ability to annually renew the contract. Entering into an agreement with Florida Rock, under the contract terms, allows the District to take advantage ofthe original Bid Price of Three and 50/100 dollars ($3.50) per ton of Coquina rock. FUNDS AVAIL.: 145-6230-546300-600 Grounds Maintenance PREVIOUS ACTION: Board approval of Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. C99-03-331 on March 28, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mosquito Control District Board approve Amendment No. 2 of Agreement No. C99-03-331, with Florida Rock Industries, Inc., to provide the District with Coquina Rock at Three and 50/00 Dollars ($3.50) per Ton, and authorize the chairman to execute the Amendment. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management a Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) _ Eff. 5/96 Im EWA MEMORANDUM TO: MOSQUITO CONTROL BOARD FROM: JAMES R. DAVID, MOSQUITO CONTROL DIRECTOR DATE: MARCH 9, 2001 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 2 OF CONTRACT WITH FLORIDA ROCK BACKGROUND: The County originally entered into a contract with Florida Rock Industries, Inc. in 1996. The County contract was piggy -backed by the District in 1999, along with the ability to annually renew the contract. Entering into an agreement with Florida Rock, under the current contract terms, allows the District to take advantage of the original Bid Price of Three and 501100 dollars (S3.50) per ton of Coquina rock. The wetland soil types from which the dikes were originally excavated consist largely of muck and marl. Therefore, the surface of the dike roadways can become destabilized when they are flooded by rains and tides, causing the muck and marl to become liquified. The Coquina proves to be an extremely valuable road cover in such cases. Coquina rock can be used to harden those areas that are prone to develop large muck and marl potholes resulting from frequent vehicle use, and thereby eliminate a safety concern. In addition, the Coquina rock is proposed as a cover for several limited parking accesses which are associated with our impoundment parks (and which also have the muck and marl base). The material is not proposed for residential roadways. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract C99-03-331, with Florida Rock Industries, Inc., to provide the District with Coquina Rock at Three and 50/00 Dollars (S3.50) per Ton, and authorize the chairman to execute the Amendment. SECOND AMENDMENT TO MARCH 23, 1999 CONTRACT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT AND FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC. THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is dated this /Z day of r Z✓ 2001, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "District", a dependent taxing district of the State of Florida, and FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC., hereinafter referred to as "Contractor". WHEREAS, on March 23, 1999, the parties entered into a one year contract which provided for the Contractor to provide coquina rock to the District on an "as needed" basis, hereinafter referred to as the "Contract'; and, It WHEREAS, on March 28, 2000, the parties entered into a First Amendment to the Contract which extended the term of the Contract for an additional year subject to a one year extension upon the same terms and conditions; and, year. WHEREAS, the parties desire to further extend the term of the Contract for an additional NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree to amend the contract as follows: 1. Paragraph 6. TERM of the Contract shall be amended to read as follows: 6. TERM OF CONTRACT The term of this Contract shall begin on March 23, 1999 and run through and including March 23, 2002. 2. Except as amended herein, the remaining terms and conditions of the March 23, 1999 Contract, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. -1- %w *me 03/16/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2001 TO 16-MAR-2001 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND TITLE EXPENSES 145 Mosquito Fund 42,146.61 146 Mosquito State I Fund 19.38 GRAND TOTAL: 42,165.99 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 21,646.06 0.00 21,646.06 0 M ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff 'Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 AGENDA March 27, 2001 MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 13, 2001. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 20 thru No. 25 PUBLIC WORKS Engineering / Application Request / Resolution No. 01-002 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Florida Beach Erosion Control Program funding application request to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and authorize the Chairman to sign the resolution. Y NOTICE All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462- 1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. `W ..d 02/16/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #20- 10-FEB-2001 TO 16-FEB-2001 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION D TITLE EXPENSES 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund 3,596.47 GRAND TOTAL: 3,596.47 PAGE PAYROLL 2,318.77 2,318.77 1 `✓ ..d 02/23/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #21- 17-FEB-2001 TO 23-FEB-2001 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION I D TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund 2,674.50 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 2,674.50 0.00 %w .000 03/02/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #22- 24-FEB-2001 TO 02-MAR-2001 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION F ) TITLE EXPENSES 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund 1,134.06 GRAND TOTAL: 1,134.06 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 2,318.77 2,318.77 03/08/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD FZABWARR WARRANT LIST 423- 03-MAR-2001 TO 08-MAR-2001 TITLE FUND SUMMARY- EROSION I � EXPENSES 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund 871.19 GRAND TOTAL: 871.19 PAGE PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 1 %w .a/ 03/16/01 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA F7ABWARR WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2001 TO 16-MAR-2001 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE EXPENSES 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund 4,202.03 GRAND TOTAL: 4,202.03 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 2,318.77 2,318.77 �Jc�s coG AGENDA REQUEST h• y� y rg , < '20RIOP TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: March 27, 2001 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[X] PRESENTED BY: Donald B. Wes , P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to submit an application request and supporting Resolution No. 01-002 to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for funding under the Florida Beach Erosion Control Program (FBECP). BACKGROUND: The FBECP is a Long -Range Budget Plan administered through FDEP. This program presently provides approximately $30 million annually to assist eligible local governments with their beach erosion control projects. Each application request must include a detailed project description, cost estimate, and supporting resolution from the governing body. Individual projects are then put through a priority ranking process based upon several criteria. In order to have an opportunity to receive funding for FY-2002/03 our request must be submitted to the State (FDEP) by March 31, 2001. This particular funding application request is in anticipation of the 2.3-mile beach restoration project, tentatively scheduled for construction during the winter/spring--2002/03. The draft General Re-evaluation Report (GRR) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers identifies cost sharing for this project at Federal=77.5% and Non- Federal=22.5%. Based upon preliminary cost estimates from the GRR, the Non -Federal share of the costs will be approximately $3 million. Since the FBECP typically allows 50%cost sharing with the local sponsor, this request is for $1.5 million. FUNDS: Nearly $1.5 million in state funds were previously earmarked in the FDEP Grant (98SL1) forthe 2.3-mile beach project. As a result of litigation for the 1.3-mile project, the 2.3-mile beach project has been delayed and some of these funds have been reallocated to other projects (i.e. causeway island, geo-tubes, monitoring, etc.). The potential also exists for the State Legislature to recall unexpended funds from older grants and reallocate them to other State projects. Therefore, this request is a reallocation of $1.5 million back into the Grant (98SL1) to assure that the funding is in place for the 2.3-mile project. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Erosion District Board approve the Florida Beach Erosion Control Program funding application request to FDEP and authorize the Chairman to sign Resolution No. 01-002. COMMISSION ACTION, [Xj APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [x]County [ ] DENIED [x]0riginating Dept. Public Work C' CONCURRENCE: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Coord in atioNSi'ntatures / [x]Mgt. & Budge 7 rn� [x]Budget/Revenue Coord.�V [x]Co. Eng [x]Finance Dept. 'tESOLUTION NO. 01-002� A RESOLUTION OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002/03 FUNDS UNDER THE FLORIDA BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM; SETTING FORTH FINDINGS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Erosion District Board of St. Lucie County, Florida ("District") and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP") have adopted the Fort Pierce Inlet Management Plan and desires to implement the recommendations contained therein; and, WHEREAS, the District has established a Long -Range Budget Plan for the Florida Beach Erosion Control Program and desires to implement specific projects contained therein; and, WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 161.101, Florida Statutes, DEP accepts and processes applications for the Florida Beach Erosion Control Program; and, WHEREAS, under the Program guidelines of the Florida Beach Erosion Control Program, the District is required to submit a supporting resolution with their application request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Erosion District Board of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: 1. DEP is requested to approve and support the maximum State funding allowed forthis application request for Fiscal Year 2002/03 and the District will provide the local share in accordance with the State Legislature's appropriation. 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. AFTER MOTION AND SECONDED, the vote on this Resolution was as follows: Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX Vice -Chairperson Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 27th day of March 2001. ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK h AwOmemoslagend 175.dep EROSION DISTRICT BOARD ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: COUNTY ATTORNEY r Fort Pierce Beat Restoration Project - PhasV✓II (2.3-Miles) Project Description: The project is an extension of a federally authorized project and consists of the restoration and maintenance of 2.3 miles of Atlantic shoreline in (Fort Pierce) St. Lucie County. Initial restoration of the project area was begun in 1971 with the construction (718,000 cy) of a 1.3-mile segment immediately south of the Fort Pierce Inlet. Prior to the expiration of the federal project life (1985), a second restoration (346,000 cy) was completed in 1983. Soon after Congress reauthorized (WRDA, 1996) the project life to the year 2020, a third shoreline restoration (975,000 cy) was completed in May, 1999. Congress finally authorized (WRDA, 1996 and 1999) the extension of the federal project one (1) additional mile, for a total project length of 2.3 miles. Location: St. Lucie County (Fort Pierce), R34 - R46 Project Evaluation: Severity of Erosion: The State of Florida's comprehensive long-term management plan, for restoration of the State's critically eroding beaches, has identified this 2.3-mile segment of shoreline as critically eroding. Restoration of this segment of shoreline is recommended within the implementation phase of the adopted Fort Pierce Inlet Management Plan. Benefits: This project provides several benefits including recreation, storm damage protection, economic (tourist) and environmental. Public access consists of four primary parks (paved parking & bathroom facilities), five secondary parks (paved parking), and several street ends. The remaining beachfront is a mixture of residential (single-family, condominiums), commercial (hotels and restaurants) and undeveloped property. Threatened and endangered marine turtles utilize the entire area for nesting purposes. Project Performance: The draft (Revised: October, 2000) General Re -Evaluation Report (feasibility document) identifies a nourishment cycle of four years and a NED optimal berm width of 50 feet for storm protection. This project is immediately downdrift of the Fort Pierce Inlet and is a recommended element of the adopted inlet management plan. Placement of beach quality material along this shoreline will provide for mitigation of the adverse impacts due to the inlet and serve as a feeder beach to the downdrift beaches. Federal Funding: The project is federally authorized to the year 2020, with a federal cost share at 77.5%. The draft General Re -Evaluation Report (GRR) is presently under review and will require substantial revision to the Environmental section due to a more detailed study (bryozoans) of the offshore borrow area (Capron Shoal) and surrounding area. An appropriations request (FY-2001/02) has been submitted to Congress requesting funds for the development of plans and specifications by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Construction funds will be requested for FY-2002/03. Page 1 of 2 Fort Pierce 19ach Restoration Project - PhaseiIM6.3-Miles) Continued Use of Innovative Technolo : The initial project (1.3-mile) was recently constructed using conventional beach fill activities, and it is anticipated that the extended project (2.3-miles) will also utilize similar technology during construction. The results of beach & inlet monitoring along with shoreline and inlet modeling, intended to enhance project performance, may yield potential innovative applications of conventional technologies. Local Commitment: St. Lucie County Erosion District has a coastal engineer on staff who will serve as project manager. The Erosion District has also retained the services of a professional coastal engineering firm to assist in the design, permitting, and other project related activities. Local funding for the project will most likely be obtained from a combination of special property assessments and ad valorem taxes. State Commitment: FDEP previously funded the initial restoration efforts of the 1.3-mile segment in 1971, 1983 and 1999. The extended project (2.3-miles) is recommended in the adopted inlet management plan for Fort Pierce Inlet and the Strategic Beach Management Plan, and is located in an area of critical erosion designation. Use of Program Funds: Funds requested for FY-2002/03 will be used to support construction and monitoring. The Erosion District is responsible for all permitting activities related to the upcoming nourishment. The USACOE will conduct the design elements including the preparation of plans and specifications. St. Lucie County Erosion District will seek credit towards the non-federal costs of the upcoming nourishment for state and local expenditures associated with permitting and other related activities. FY-2002/03 Project Task Estimated Project Costs ($1,000's) Monitoring Total Federal 100 State Local Construction 0 12.900 _ 10.000 50 50 1,450 $13,000 $10,000 1,450 $1,500 $1,500 Page 2 of 2