Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 01-22-02
.. \.,... '--' -.".,I ......, JANUARY 22, 2002 9:00 AM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman v,ill ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE CO:tvfMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have bacJ...'Up material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' '-w ....".¡ , ....." www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA January 22, 2002 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE . 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held January 15, 2002. ApfXòv',º& 2. PROCLMIATIONS / PRESENTATIONS / ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Employee of the Quarter - Doug Anderson, County Administrator, will announce the "Employee of the Quarter". B. Announcement / There will be a Joint Meeting with the City of Port St. Lucie on :tvlarch 14, 2002 at 3:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. C. Announcement / The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Strategic Planning Session at 8:00 am on February 1, 2002 at St. Lucie West Country Club in Port St. Lucie. D. Announcement / The Fort Pierce City Commission and Board of County Commissioners will hold a joint workshop to review the status of the Port Master Plan on February 19, 2002 at 1:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA ft-pprwed M IItJl5 C(~ L{-ct c- ~A - ttr:::~) NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boara at these meetings will need a record of the proceedmgs and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any parry to the proceedings ID.ll be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior fo the meeting. \...- '--' ....,¡ "'-'" REGULAR AGENDA JANUARY 22, 2002 PAGE nvo PUBLIC HEARINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SA. Resolution No. 02- 029'- / Duke Energy /Ouasi-Tudicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a 12 month extension to Resolution No. 01-007 which granted a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction of a 640 megawatt, electric generation plant. Location: south side of Glades Cut-Off Road approximately one mile south of the intersection of Glades CU~~~I~dð~a¿y~íö'Æ't 2Jjl-{omh-=?, e. ,~c:)-o Elíð o(Public Hearingsa¡yj C~~ 6. AIRPORT A. Amendment to the Environmental Resource Permit Joint Participation Agreement UP A) with the Florida Department of Transportation for Airport Security - Consider staff recommendation to approve the amendment to allow reimbursement to the Sheriff's Department in the amount of $32,309.41 and the Airport in the amount of $12,470, for funds spent to date, and allow for the balance to be used for part time security coverage until September 30, 2002. 50 )-PP(6\~ B. Radar Coverage at St. Lucie County International Airport - Consider staff recommendation to concur with the consultant's conclusion and provide for the installation of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certified Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System (STARS) LITE terminal display Sy~, as the most appropriate low level radar coverage. ADMINISTRATION ~ (b{öÎlnolClCfum nfecfu9.. ï. A. Duke Energy North America (Duke Energy) Tax Abatement Request - Staff is requesting direction on whether or not a letter of intent should be sent to Duke Energy offering the requested 3-year tax abatement program. Staff is concerned that approval of this application may lead to additional r" ,'A _~ applications by companies that are similÄ()pr~' (2) -- 2-) eø-rt1f)~ci B. Bi-weekly Committee Reports - The Board will give updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on. '-' ~. ......, ....I 9. {'Q)Y10 J0 MP~cPJ :11$;t COUNTY AITORNEY {\S ~ d o~~1þ Resolution No. 02-59 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution·~..{ joining the Children's Services Council of St. Lucie County, St. Lucie County School Board, and other governm~nt a ge~ci.es in s U,~ _,porting the ~:o~~ ~_.f .th: ~~_~~___. ent. .. . state and local tax system ill St. LUCie County, Flonda. . . ' - // COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan - Staff requests that the Board provide comments, concerns and areas for improvement with the draft goals, objectives and policies of the Port Ì\laster Plan. REGULAR AGENDA JANUARY 22, 2002 PAGE THREE 8. '-' \.w CONSENT AGENDA Januarv 22, 2002 .....,I ~ 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list J\To. 16 2. PARKS AND RECREATIO~ A. Community Parks System Master Plan / Lawnwood Recreation Complex Master Plan Update (Parks Referendum) - A written update has been forwarded to the Board. B. Fairwinds Golf Course Pavilion - Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract and Scope of Work with Thomas Lucido & Associates in the amount of $9,000. . C. Budget Amendment No. 02-118 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment to reimburse the Parks and Recreation budget in the amount of $9,55-1: for dollars expended to accommodate the A'.IlSTAD Sailing Ship's visit. 3. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-219/ Cortez Blvd. At 29th Street Culvert Replacement - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Lucas Marine Construction, Inc. in the amount of $126,650 for a total project budget of $144,315, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. Staff also recommends reallocating funds in the amount of $39,915 from the NSLRWCD Canal 102 & Selvitz Culvert Project (to be funded in FY2002-03). B. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to ad\"ertise an Invitation to Bid for Library Book Rental Plan Services. C. Budget Amendment No. 02-114/ Equipment Request No. 02-17ï - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver, budget amendment and equipment request for the purchase of twelve (12) automatic external defibrillators from Safety Products, Inc. in the amount of $22,680. D. Permission to Adnrtise / Equipment Request Nos. 02-187, 02-188, 02-189 and 02-190 - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise an Invitation to Bid for the purchase and installation of Media Presentation Equipment for the Commission Chambers and grant approval of the equipment requests to purchase the equipment. 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY ß Kirschner & Garland, P.A. Amendment to Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed amendment for legal representation ofindigents for non-capital felonies and misdemeanors, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. ~r~\fD-lù~) t~o ApprðJfri. ð \ . C~ :MoSþO/ C~SENT AG~A JANUARY 22,2002 PAGE TWO ....." .....,,¡ì 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY (CONTINUED) B. George D. Dugan, III, Esq. Amendment to Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed amendment for legal representation of indigent persons in cases calling within the category of Juvenile Delinquency, when the Public Defender is precluded from Representation. C. Cultural Affairs Council Member Reappointments - Consider staff recommendation to r~appoint Marti Reno-Curtis, Margaret Ash and G. Edgar Straeffer for second terms on the Council. 5. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Petty Cash Account for the Court Administrator - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to establish an account in the amount of $100. 6. UTILITIES Treasure Coast Regional Utilities Organization Feasibility Study for a Bio-Solids Treatment Facility - Consider staff recommendation to authorize payment in the amount of $12,500 for St. Lucie County's share in cost for the study. 7. PUBLIC WORKS A. Solid Waste Baling & Recycling Facility Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve final payment to Adams Robinson in the amount of $50,000. B. Solid Waste / Equipment Request No. 02-183 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment request for the sole source purchase of two (2) Safetech Conveyor Safety Systems from Sierra International in the amount of $45,700. C. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Recreational Trails Program - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the County Administrator to sign and submit the grant application to assist with the construction of the Lakewood Park Recreational Path. 8. ADMINISTRATION District 19 Medical Examiner Reappointment - Consider staff recommendation to concur with the Medical Examiners Commission to recommend reappointment of Dr. Roger E. Mittleman, and authorize the County Administrator to complete and return the reappointment form to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. '-' '-- CONSENT AGENDA JANUARY 22, 2002 PAGE THREE ....",., ....., 9. MOSQUITO CONTROL Coastal Impact Assistance Program Grant for the Reintegration of Bear Point Mosquito Impoundment to the Indian River Lagoon - Consider staff recommendation that the Chairman sign the Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) grant award documents and the Interlocal Agreement with the St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District to administer the proj ect. 10. SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2002 State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) Grant - Consider staff recommendation to approve electronic submission of the grant application, and authorize the County Administrator to sign the application. '-'" ....", < JANUARY 22, 2002 9:00 AM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELC011E GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission ,,,ill discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARlNGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone \\ith a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(8) hours prior to the meeting. ~ .....I www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA January 22, 2002 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ,,1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held January 15,2002. 2. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS / ANNOUNCEMENTS . A. Employee of the Quarter - Doug Anderson, County Administrator, will announce the "Employee of the Quarter". B. Announcement / There will be a Joint Meeting with the City of Port St. Lucie on March 14,2002 at 3:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. C. Announcement / The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Strategic Planning Session at 8:00 am on February 1, 2002 at St. Lucie West Country Club in Port St. Lucie. D. Announcement / The Fort Pierce City Commission and Board of County Commissioners will hold a joint workshop to review the status of the Port Master Plan on February 19, 2002 at 1 :30 pm in the Commission Chambers. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boara at these meetings will need a record of the proceedmgs and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted tbe opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearingupon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the~t. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1418 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior fo the meeting. ~ .....I REGULAR AGENDA JANUARY 22, 2002 PAGE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT \.ßA. Resolution No. 02- 029· / Duke Energy /Quasi- Tudicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a 12 month extension to Resolution No. 01-007 which granted a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the ~~ construction of a 640 megawatt, electric generation plant. Location: south side of ¡( \)'rJ GI.ades Cut-Oif'ioad approximately one mile south of the intersection of Glades t\ ~ 'li'. ~ Cl\t-Off.Roadllnd Selvitz Road in the Midway Industrial Park ¡Y' ,... F . ( ,0 fJJuu " 0-- t /þJ t~ if ~~: . ~,f~yl . End of Public Hearings P.~/l~) S,I'- 1'~~U:n iJII mSJfilnll AIRPORT j 6. j I Amendment to the Environmental Resource Permit Joint Participation Agreement UP A) with the Florida Department of Transportation for Airport Security - Consider staff recommendation to approve the amendment to allow reimbursement to the Sheriff's Department in the amount of S32,309.41 and the Airport in the amount of $12,470, for funds spent to date, and allow for the balance to be used for part time security coverage until September 30, 2002. Radar Coverage at St. Lucie County International Airport - Consider staff recommendation to concur \\ith the consultant's conclusion and provide for the installation of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certified Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System (STARS) LITE terminal display system. as the ~m~st a. pr~p.ri.ate lOW. level radar cove~age:.- J~ ()¡.JL.:;. <-b-r 1<'-'/ ¿;;;-r># /11 '-'~ c·_..:: .-.:Y" ADMINISTRATION i J' ,-,>, 1.-_ --J} c> //};.-g 7. , ()~ ~& /t8 /' f~ A. Duke Energy North America (Duke Energy) Tö,,'\. Abatement Request - Staff is requesting direction on whether or not a letter of intent should be sent to Duke Energy offering the requested 3-year tax abatement program. Staff is concerned that approval of this application may lead to additional applications by companies that are similarly situated. B. Bi-weekly Committee Reports - The Board will give updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on. ~ ""'" REGULAR AGENDA JANUARY 22, 2002 PAGE THREE {d l) vi · VI j-tV it) 8. COUNTY ATTORNEY / Resolution No. 02-59 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution joining the Children's Services Council of St. Lucie County, St. Lucie County School Board, and other governmental agencies in supporting the reform of the current state and local tax system in St. Lucie County, Florida. 9. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan - Staff requests that the Board provide comments, concerns and areas for improvement with the draft goals, objectives and policies of the Port Master Plan. ~ CONSENT AGENDA Januarv 22. 2002 ",., 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 16 2. PARKS AND RECREATION A. Community Parks System Master Plan / LaWllwood Recreation Complex Master Plan Update (parks Referendum) - A written update has been forwarded to the Board. B. Fairwinds Golf Course Pavilion - Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract and Scope of Work with Thomas Lucido & Associates in the amount of $9,000. . C. Budget Amendment No. 02-118 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment to reimburse the Parks and Recreation budget in the amount of $9,554 for dollars expended to accommodate the Al\1ISTAD Sailing Ship's visit. 3. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-219 / Cortez Blvd. At 29th Street Culvert Replacement - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Lucas Marine Construction, Inc. in the amount of $126,650 for a total project budget of $144,315, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. Staff also recommends reallocating funds in the amount of $39,915 from the NSLRWCD Canal 102 & Selvitz Culvert Project (to be funded in FY2002-03). B. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise an Invitation to Bid for Library Book Rental Plan Services. C. Budget Amendment No. 02-114 /Equipment Request No. 02-1ïï - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver, budget amendment and equipment request for the purchase of twelve (12) automatic external defibrillators from Safety Products, Inc. in the amount of $22,680. D. Permission to Advertise / Equipment Request Nos. 02-187, 02-188, 02-189 and 02-190 - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise an Invitation to Bid for the purchase and installation of Media Presentation Equipment for the Commission Chambers and grant approval of the equipment requests to purchase the equipment. 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. ~rschner & Garland, P.A. Amendment to Agreement - Consider staff / f7 ./ recommendation to approve the proposed amendment for legal 11 ^,~. representation of indigents for non-capital felonies and misdemeanors, and ./ p.1t authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. CONSENT AG~DA JANUARY 22, 2002 PAGE TWO ...,.I 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY (CONTINUED) B. George D. Dugan, III, Esq. Amendment to Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed amendment for legal representation of indigent persons in cases calling within the category of Juvenile Delinquency, when the Public Defender is precluded from Representation. C. Cultural Affairs Council Member Reappointments - Consider staff recommendation to r~appoint Marti Reno-Curtis, Margaret Ash and G. Edgar Straeffer for second terms on the Council. 5. MA..c'\!AGEMENT AND BUDGET Petty Cash Account for the Court Administrator - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to establish an account in the amount of $100. 6. UTILITIES Treasure Coast Regional Utilities Organization Feasibility Study for a Bio-Solids Treatment Facility - Consider staff recommendation to authorize payment in the amount of $12,500 for St. Lucie County's share in cost for the study. 7. PUBLIC WORKS A. Solid Waste Baling & Recycling Facility Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve final payment to Adams Robinson in the amount of $50,000. B. Solid Waste / Equipment Request No. 02-183 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment request for the sole source purchase of two (2) Safetech Conveyor Safety Systems from Sierra International in the amount of $45,700. C. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Recreational Trails Program - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the County Administrator to sign and submit the grant application to assist with the construction of the Lakewood Park Recreational Path. 8. AD~ITNISTRATION District 19 Medical Examiner Reappointment - Consider staff recommendation to concur with the Medical Examiners Commission to recommend reappointment of Dr. Roger E. Mittleman, and authorize the County Administrator to complete and return the reappointment form to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. ~ CONSENT AGENDA JANUARY 22,2002 PAGE THREE ...." 9. MOSQUITQ CONTROL Coastal Impact Assistance Program Grant for the Reintegration of Bear Point Mosquito Impoundment to the Indian River Lagoon - Consider staff recommendation that the Chairman sign the Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) grant award documents and the Interlocal Agreement with the St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District to administer the project. 10. SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2002 State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) Grant - Consider staff recommendation to approve electronic submission of the grant application, and authorize the County Administrator to sign the application. , ~ ..."" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: January 15,2002 Tape: 1-2 Convened: 7:00 p.m. Adjourned: 10:00 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chainnan, Doug Coward, Cliff Bames, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Frannie Hutchinson Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Dennis Murphy, Interim Community Development Director, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Don West, County Engineer, David Kelly, Planning Manager, Deputy Scipioni, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-026) It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the minutes of the meeting held January 8, 2002; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2., PROCLAMA nONS/PRESENT A nON A. Senator Ken Pruitt awarded checks for Community Budget Funding Requests. B. Resolution No. 02-58- Proclaiming the month of January "Mentor Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 02-58; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Mr. Mike Bowers, President of the Boy's and Girls Club was present to accept the proclamation. C. Announcement! There will be a Joint Meeting with the City of Port St. Lucie on March 14, 2002 at 3:30 p.m. in the Commission Chambers. D. Announcement! The BCC will hold a Strategic Planning Session on February 1,2002 at 8:00 a.m. at St. Lucie West Country Club in Port St. Lucie, 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms. Patricia Ferrick, North Fork Property Owners Association, addressed the Board regarding the tree protection and vegetation ordinance. It was her opinion that the permits to rcmove cxotics circumvent the tree protection ordinance and asked the Board to consider amending the ordinance. Ms Ferrick provided comments from the North Fork Property Owners Assoc. Mr. Herbert Beach, White City resident addressed the Board stating he concurred with Ms. Ferrick's comments. 4. CONSENT AGENDA(1-390) It was movcd by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the Consent Agenda. upon roll call, motion ci1rried unnnimously. 1 · "".... .". \#Ç, ,'to. ~.,o. \.f ...." Dear Chairman Coward, and Board Members. Our association has recently become aware that our tree protection ordinance and vegetation removal ordinance can be and is being circumvented with the issuance of a permit to remove exotics. This is occurring because currently we do not require site inventory and the location of non exotics that may be located on the property. A site inventory and inspection is needed prior to the issuance of this type of permit. Exotics are defined as: Non-native vegetation that is considered a nuisance, invasive, or a pest. Exotic vegetation includes, but is not limited to, Brazilian pepper (Schinos terebinthis folios). Australian Pine (Casuarinaa equisetifolia), and Melaleuca (Malealeuca quinquenervia). We feel that requirements should be instituted prior to the issuance of a permit for the removal of exotics. Those requirements should include a vegetation inventory, which shows: ~a. location of all types of vegetation in the area of exotic removal. b. Vegetation defined as: Any living plant tissue including trees, shrubs, herbs, hedges, grasses, fungi, and algae. c. Protection for all non-exotic vegetation in area as specified in section 6.00.03 [1] in the land Development Regulations. d. Inventory of site and the: location of Habitat of Endangered or Threatened Species. "' e. Protection for the habitat of Endangered or Threatened Species as specified in 6.04.00 [D] {a.} of the lDR'S. We have learned recently that we have been living in a fool's paradise in our assumption that we had a vegetation protection ordinance that did just that, protect. We have an ordinance, but there is a way to by-pass it. - I '-' ..., We recently learned that by getting a permit to remove exotics, no inventory lists were required, that showed the location of vegetation existing on the site. or the endangered or threatened species as defined in the LOR's. Just getting a permit to remove exotics that exist circumvents the ordinances that were designed to protect the Habitat of Endangered or Threatened Species and to protect the Vegetation on site as defined in the Land Development Regulations. We respectfully request you research the situation and rectify the loophole that exists. By requiring that a site location map which indicates the type of vegetation on the 'premises be presented with the application for the removal of exotics and reauire a site ;nsoection for Vegetation and Habitat for Endangered or Threatened Species by the office issuing the permit In addition we also request that you keep an updated list of newly identified exotic species and add to that list of exotics, for example, the exotic Asian Climbing Fern, as identified. Respectfully, ... North Fork Property Owners C.Jackson Sect/Trea. Patricia Ferrick, Governmental Representative 01/08J02:FileNFORD11 ") .. " \-. ...., 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 15. 2. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. EngineeringIHarmony Heights Stonnwater Master Plan- The Board approved Work Authorization No.3 with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., in the amount of $66,235.20 for thc development of a stonnwater master plan, and authorized the Chainnan to sign the work authorization. B. Engineering/Orange A venue and Header Canal Bridge Replacement Project/Con Span Bridge System- The Board approved and authorized the Chairman to sign Change Order No.1 in the amount of$41,202.50 for a total contract price of $640,119.60 to Murphy Construction Company to complete the modification to the project. 3. PURCHASING "- A. Pennission to Advertise- The Board approved advertising a Request for Proposals for Parking Garage Management Services for the Downtown Parking Garage. B. Pennission to Advertise- The Board approved advertising a Request for Proposals for a Continuing Contract for Professional Surveying Services. C. Bid No. 02-0111 Air Stripping Treatment System- The Board approved awarding the bid to the low bidder, Enviro-Logical Solutions, Inc., in the amount of $33,795 and authorized the Chainnan to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. D. Bid No. 02-020- Spruce Bluff Preserve Boardwalk- The Board approved awarding the bid to the low bidder, Custom Built Marine Construction, Inc., in the amount of $37,000 and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 02-51, 02-52, 02-53,02-54/South Hutchinson Island Public Utility Easements for Water Facility hnprovements- The Board approved accepting the easements and authorized the Chainnan to sign the resolutions, and directed staffto record the documents in the Public Records of S1. Lucie County, Florida. B. Resolution No. 02-57/ North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2002- The Board approved adopting the resolution as drafted. 5. PUBLIC WORKS Cost Share Partnership with the City ofport St. Lucie- The Board approved funding of $10,788.50 for the construction ofa temporary sidewalk from Port S1. Lucie High School to Walton Road and granted permission to reallocate funds from the Oleander Bike Path Project (will be funded in FY 2002-2003). 2 ',"" ....,¡ 6. AIRPORT UTILITIES Fire Suppression Improvement Project at St. Lucie County International Airport- The Board approved the contract and professional services agreement with PBS& J in the amount of $91 ,800 for the design and preparation of construction drawings. 7. CENTRAL SERVICES Administration Building Construction Project- The Board approved the work authorization for Edlund & Dritenbas in the amount of $176,308 and authorized the Chairmarf to sign the agreement as prepared by the County Attorney. REGULAR AGENDA 5.A COUNTY ATTORNEY (1-1044) Resolution No. 02-01/Revised Guidelines- Industrial Development Revenue Bonds- Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution as drafted. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Resolution No. 02-01~ and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 5.B PUBLIC WORKS (1-1114) River Branch Estates/Resolution No. 02-023/Potable Water Improvements PSL Utilities- Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment of the River Branch Estates Municipal Services Benefit Unit, approve the preliminary assessment roll and authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve Resolution No. 02-023; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 5.C Resolution No. 02-028Nerizon Wireless - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 120 ft., monopole telecommunications tower in the AG-1 . Mr. Jerry Neiderman, Attorney for Verizon Wireless addressed the Board. Com. Coward questioned that with the way this proposal is currently laid out, if it will prevent the county from moving forward with additional right of way needs in the area. The Community Development Director advised the Board and Com. Coward that this is a possibility, it would not preclude them from moving forward, but, it would get in the way. However, he is not sure this project would even pan out in the future. The lower has a usable Ii fe of 25 years. The Community Development Director that when the county does start to construct that roadway, there are some larger constraints to deal with other than this one tower and that this is the canals. Com. Coward stated he did not have a problem with the tower, however, he was concerned with the fact that it was so close and asked if it could be moved further to the east. Mr. Jason Laksy, Engineer for Vtòrizon, addressed Com. Coward's questions and addressed what the code would preclude. :3 '- ...., / Mr. Beck, Attorney for the property owner, addressed the legalities of precluding this project from moving forward due to a road project that was speculative at this point. Mr. Russakis, property owner addressed the Board and stated he would like to resolve this issue today due to time constraints. *** It was the consensus of the Board to bring back this item later during this meeting while staff and the petitioners discuss the issue further. 5.D. SilverLakesl Preliminary Planned Unit Development- Consider staff recommendation to decline to proceed with the requested extension and determine that the project be sent back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further review. Mr. Kellý addressed this Board on this issue. He stated they have been working with the developer and believe they are coming to some type of a solution. Staff felt it should go back to the P & Z Commission and the developer is aware and is in agreement. The Board is not proceeding with the requested extension at this time due to the significant changes in the project and they are sending this issue back to the P & Z Commission for review. No action required. 5.E. Resolution No. 02-205/Palm Breezes Club- Preliminary Planned Unit Development- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting preliminary planed unit development approval for the project known as Palm Breezes Club Planned Unit Development. Mr. Kelly advised the Board that the developer has agreed with staff that they would provide sufficient security in an amount determined by the county to provide with the design permitting and construction of a left turn lane on North Rock Road at the intersection with Orange A venue. He has also agreed to provide the same amount for the county to use for improvements to Orange Avenue between the project entrance and Kings Highway. Conditions 2-B and 2-C which were provided have been re-worded . Mr. Harrell pointed out that paragraph 5 has also been moditìed and there were no changes as of this evening and the key issue is how those dollar amounts are leveraged in order to get this done. The County Attorney advised the Board that on paragraph C page 6. The date should read" January 15, 2004" in order to give it the full benefit of the approval period. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Brvhn, to approve Resolution No. 02-205; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. (1-2717) 5.F. Resolution No. 02-024- Savanna Club Phase V- Consider staffrecommenêlation to approve the resolution granting a Major Adjustment to an existing Planned Unit Development for the project known as Savanna Club. Dr. Dolores A. Morgan, property owner in the Savanna Club addressed the Board regarding this issue and provided the Board with a copy of her comment (as attached). Mr. Bobby Klein, Attorney for the petitioner, addressed the Board's questions and the public comments. Mr. Klein requested the second condition be deleted, i.e. the special needs condition. He does not object to the facility being a hurricane shelter, however, they are concerned with the requirements and conditions. Dr. Delores Morgan advised the Board that the homeowners association does not want a special needs facility, due to the liability. 4 - . . 1980. I aI'LurrcntIy a member of the Board ofDirectors"'¡the SCPOA bürI am speaking as a resident.. The residents in the first 3 phases of the Savanna Club bought in a community which sold its land. When the current developer came in he changed that and is now leasing the land. This was a major change we as residents had no voice in. The Board of Directors at the time negotiated a settlement agreement with the developer who went ban1crupt and that was a part of the settlement, the membership of the Savanna Club Property Owners Association did not have a vote in this important decision. -. .-.......,..- ......a......'It",I"-' Currently there are 950 homes in the first three phases and the recreational facilities and parking have been adequate for that number. We are permitted 200 people in our clubhouse for social and business activities. The developer has closed on 213 homes in phase 4 and we are not certain how many more he has permits for in that phase since he has not communicated these important points to us. He is currently asking for over 200 more homes in phase 5 and will build a club house which will provide for activities for $mall groups but will not accomodate large numbers. We have attempted to accomodate the Phase 4 residents in our clubhouse activities but because of the numbers and the parking available this has created numerous problems. We have attempted to get the developer to hear our concerns but there has been little response. Parking must be a priority not only at the new clubhouse, but also at the existing one. ... There have been comments made by the developer of gating the . community. Because of Lennard Road, this would cut off phase I, those members of our community who have lived here the longest. We are also concerned it will divide our community even more than has already been done. We notice there is on the current request an exit in the future to Lennard road. We do not object to ./ Mr. John Nepsey, area resident, addressed the Board on this issue. Ms. Lucille Thou, area resident, addressed the problem with the golf course flooding and asked the problem be corrected. Mr. Joel Gainer, Vice President of the Joint Venture, addressed the Board's question on the hurricane shelter. Upon conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 02-024 with the changes to the conditions as noted; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 5.G. Ordinance No. 02-004/ Land Development Code Amendment to Section 3.01.03 (Q)(7) Cãmmercial Neighborhood Conditional Uses to Provide for the Establishment and Operation of Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages as an Accessory Use to a Restaurant and/or Civic, Social and Fraternal Organization) in the CN Zoning District- Consider staff recommendation not to approve the ordinance. . Mr. William Morales, property owner, addressed the Board requesting this ordinance be changed. Mr. Earl Jones, Lakewood Park addressed the Board in opposition to the change in zoning due to the close proximity to a residential area. Mr. WiUiam Adams, Holiday Pines resident addressed the Board In opposition to changing the ordinance. Ms. Pat Perrick, 51. Lucic COllnty residcnt, addresscd the ßoard in opposition to changing thc ordinancc alld slatcd that a changc to COl1llllcrci¡¡1 Gcncral lor Mr. Morales would be more beneficial. Mr. Herbert Beach, White City Improvement Club, advised the Board that they are in opposition to changing the existing ordinance. Ms. Arlene Goodman, White City resident, addressed the Board in opposition to the change requested. The Board advised those present that a second public hearing will be held on February 5, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. 6. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE South 251h S1. Landscaping Improvements (Airoso Blvd. To Midway Road)- Consider staff recommendation to approve the final design and grant permission to advertise for construction in the amount of $250,000. Mr. Mike Houston, Houston, Cuozzo Group, addressed the Board regarding the design for the project. Com. Bruhn suggested the project continue aU the way to the Airoso intersection in hopes that in the future the city of Port St. Lucie may consider reimbursing the county for that end of the project. Mr. Houston advised the Board that in his discussion with the engineering division of the city, they had stated they had designed extensive landscaping for Airoso south ofPritna Vista and Mr. Houston suggested they take some of those dollars and put them to the north. The representative from the Homeowner Association addressed the Board in favor this landscaping project by his development and they are very happy with the Plan. 5 '- ..."" this but we sincerely hope it will not result in setting a precedent to gate the entire community. This we vehemently oppose. We currently have tennis courts which have been adequate for the resident population but will not accomodate increased numbers of people or cars. We do not know if additional courts are planned. We are currently trying to get the developer to solve problems in Phase 4 relating to drainage as well as problems on our golf course resulting trom the work already begun on Phase 5. We are told these will be resolved when Phase 5 is completed or when it suits the developer. This is not acceptable. The developer has the resources to make a 9 hole golf course into an 18 hole course in another of his communities but will not meet his reponsibilities in our community. We are asking our commissioners to protect those tax payers who have. been in this community for years, who love The Savanna Club, who recognize the need for growth but who want to see it done right. 1. Please require them to properly complete phase 4. 2. Please require them to keep us informed of their activities which affect the residents so we can inform them of what to expect. 3. Please look closely at the clubhouse they are proposing and the one we currently have and be certain there is adequate parking and other facilities for the numbers of people being brought in. 4. Please keep us informed of requests ±rom the developer when they have implications for the tax paying residents already living here. 5. We realize we are a growing community, but request you keep the safety and quality of life of the residents uppermost in your minds when. making decisions rather than making the influx ... / /"...//< \.... ) ..." of money your first priority. We make this request on behalf of all residents of 81. Lucie County. ... "". ....¡ It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Barnes to approve the landscaping improvements on S. 25th St. that are specifically the responsibility of the county and also to exclude the landscaping to be provided by Mr. Rhodes; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn; Aye's: Lewis, Hutchinson, Barnes, Coward, motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. 7. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 02-027/Brandon Capital Corp- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan Approval for the project known as Sands, Lakeview Lakeshore and Amenity Site. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 02-027; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 8. A. )2-2496) Amtrak East Coast Passenger Service Project- Consider staff recommendation to appoint one Commissioner to act as a liaison to actively follow and participate in the ongoing Amtrak Project. ... Com. Lewis volunteered. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to appoint Com. Lewis; and, upon roll call motion carried unanimously. S.B This item was pulled. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court 6 /j-p 1'1\ "JA '- ~...~ HUMAN RESOURCES · MEMORANDUM #02-01 TO: DOUGLAS ANDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: PATRICIA CLUTE EMPLOYEE & LABOR RELATIONS MANAGER ~ DATE: JAN. 2, 2002 SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER On Jan. 2, 2002, a committee consisting of Marie Gouin, Michael Rath, Paul Phillips and Beth Ryder met to review the nominations submitted for seven candidates for "Employee of the Quarter", (copies of the nominations are attached). The committee unanimously chose Doreen Pike, Library Technical Associate III as the Employee of the Quarter for October, November and December. With your approval, I will notify Ms. Pike and arrange to have her name placed on a plaque to be displayed in the Administration Annex lobby. ug s Anderson, County Administrator PAC/mp Attachments Copy to: Susan Kilmer, Library Director \.. .....,; . Bo-ARD OF COUNTY . COMMISSIONERS DATE: 12-14-01 NOMINATION FOR EMPLOYEE OF THE QUA NAME: Doreen Pike ~C 1 7 2001 00 DEP ARTMENT /DIVISION: Libra HUMAN RESOURCES ST.lUCIE COUNTY. flORIDA .. .. ' IS HEREBY NOMINATED FOR THE EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER FOR THE REASON STATED BELOW: Mrs. Pike is always the first person to volunteer to help out whenever there is a special project or job to be done - no one has to astt. for her assistance she gladly offers. This year she has hel1>ed in translatin2 the librarv's website and library service policies into Spanish for our Spanish patrons. She serves as a translator whenever a Datron comes in and is having problems asking questions. Mrs. Pike has also obtained her notary license so that she may assist our Hispanic patrons. MTS. Pikp h~s s~Pppprl in ~n pTnvirl~ rm'TiPT service to our Lakewood Park Branch Library during the many times that we have been without onT M~in~~n~nrp Tpr'hniri"n ~h.. i.. p"r-i..nr- in ,,11 her dealings with staff and is a real team player. ^Å. _ 0.. 1/ Iì ) ~\Á J ~e ,l} I:,) . ~¡¿j'VlM_ SIGNATURE OF NOMINATOR S \ì. e (LIsa o..ssZ·sted >~(\ +he nJt.\.rl\ u~ 1'\,111-+D r~ \ (./ L1 S. C\.€. (ves Gl+- rOt ~ ..' rJ... r I'V- d ICI..\:5 \'"'-' ne. \ é>(",,\ . ~~e.. \J'(V...nQ~\ Cl¡'.1 ~ 0 _ I/. ---tt '- '-'-'- te-\;p e..cf (.Ù I~ P~L}~Ìì~ . It. CG\L~c:f-ì by, 'THor -10 O(bS~~ ~ V'eILCU a:tt ð-,-l :s fORMS / empqt r I ," ~ ......... ....I Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5A Jan.22,2002 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ [ I [X] Quasi-JD [ X] To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Interim Community Development Dir SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 02-029 granting a 12 Month Extension to Resol tion 01-007 which granted a Conditional Use Permit Approval for the Construction of a 640 megawatt, electric generation plant known as Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Plant. (BCC-Q -001) On February 6,2001, this Board Approved Resolution 01-007 granting Conditional Use/Major Site Plan approval for the project known as Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Plant, in the U (Utilities) Zoning District for property located at the southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately one mile south of the intersection of Glades Cut-Off Road and Selvits Road in the Midway Industrial Park area of the County. This resolution included a specific requirement that this Conditional Use Permit/Major Site Plan would expire on February 6, 2002, unless a Certificate of Occupancy were issued or an extension granted consistent with the provision of Section 11.07.05(F) of the County's Land Development Code. Section 11.07.05(F) provides that the Board may consider one extension, of no more than 24 months, from the original date of expiration. The Board may grant an extension for a shorter period of time. BACKGROUND: Section 11.02.06(B)(1 )(a) of the Land Development Code sets out that the maximum period for which a Major Site Plan may be extended, is twelve months from the original date of expiration. Consistent with this, staff recommends the Board limit any Conditional Use Extension to the Sdme 12 month period. If approved, the expiration date for this Conditional Use would be February 6, 2003. As of this date, construction has not started on this project. The applicant has indicated that they have obtained the following permits: Final FDEP Air Permit, FDEP Conceptual Environmental Resource Permit, Final SFWMD Consumptive Water Use Permit, Final FAA Notification on Stack Height and NSLWCD Canal Drainage Permit. The applicant has been working with the SLC Building Department to address any issues with their building requirements. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-029, subject to the conditions contained therein. ONCURRENce: COMMISSION ACTION' W APPROVED U DENIED 5- 0 D OTHER As amended to extend operation extension to 24 months and construction 0 1 for extension of 12 month~6~-t Coordination! Signatures County Attorney l Mgl. & Budget: Originating Dept.: Other: Finance: ~ Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Purchasing: Other: \.....t ""'" COMMISSION REVIEW: January 22,2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Interim Community Development Director DATE: January 15, 2002 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 02-029, granting a 12-Month Extension to Resolution 01-007 which granted a Conditional Use Permit Approval for the Construction of a 640 megawatt, electric generating plant known as Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station. (File No.: BCC-02-001) St. Lucie County has received a request from the developer of the Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Plant for a 24-month extension to their previously approved Conditional Use Permit for the construction and operation of a 640 megawatt, electric generating plant in the U (Utilities) Zoning District. This specific use is proposed for location on the southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately one mile south of the intersection of Glades Cut-Off Road and Selvitz Road in the Midway Industrial Park area of the County. On February 6, 2001, this Board Approved Resolution 01-007 granting this requested Conditional Use. This resolution included a specific requirement that this Conditional Use would expire on February 6, 2002, unless a Certificate of Occupancy were issued or an extension granted consistent with the provision of Section 11.07.05(F) of the County's Land Development Code. Section 11.07.05(F) provides that the Board may consider one extension, of no more than 24 months, from the original date of expiration. The Board may grant an extension for a shorter period of time. Concurrent with the Conditional Use Permit granted under Resolution 01-007, this Board approved the Major Site Plan for the project known as Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station. This approval was to expire on February 6, 2002, concurrent with the project's Conditional Use Permit, unless either a building permit or site, plan extension were granted. .~ As of this date, construction has not started on this project. The applicant has indicated that they have obtained the following permits: Final Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Air Permit, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Conceptual Environmental Resource Permit, Final South Florida Water Management District Consumptive Water Use Permit, Final FAA Notification on Stack Height and North St. Lucie Water Control District Canal Drainage Permit. The January 15, 2002 Page 3 '-' ...., Subject: Duke Energy Extension BCC-02-001 If you have any questions, please let us know. AICP Development Director DJMlcs H:Iwp/Conditional Use/Duke Energy/12201Ibccmemo.fnl cc: Noreen Dreyer .~ ......... "wi 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 RESOLUTION NO. 02-029 File No.: BCC-02-001 A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MAJOR SITE PLAN EXTENSION FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS DUKE ENERGY FT. PIERCE GENERATING STATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION 1. On February 6,2001, this Board approved Resolution 01-007 which granted a Conditional Use Permit to Duke Energy Ft. Pierce, LLC, for the construction of a 640 megawatt, electric generating plant in the U (Utilities) Zoning District for the project known as Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station. 2. The developer of the Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station has requested that they be granted a 12 month extension to their Conditional Use permit approved thorough Resolution 01-007, which if approved would carry this projects approval period through to February 6, 2003. 3. On January 22, 2002, this Board held public hearings on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. SITE PLAN EXTENSION 4. On February 6, 2001, this Board approved Resolution 01-007 which granted a Site Plan Approval to Duke EnerQV Ft. Pierce. LLC, for the construction of a 640 megawatt, electric generating plant at the southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately one mile south of the intersection of Glades Cut-Off Road and Selvitz Road in the U (Utilities) Zoning District for the project known as Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station. January 15, 2002 Page 1 Resolution 02-029 Duke Conditional Use Extension '- ..., 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 5. The developer of Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station has requested an amendment to the site plan conditions approved in Resolution 01-007. 6. On January 22, 2002, this Board held public hearings on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Conditional Use Permit granted to Duke Energy Ft. Pierce, LLC., for the construction and operation of a 640 megawatt electric generating plant in the U Zoning District, which project is to be known as Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station, is hereby extended for an additional 12 months, which would now expire on February 6, 200f B. Pursuant to Section 11.02.06(B) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Site Plan approval granted to Duke Energy Ft. Pierce, LLC., for the construction Q.~ of a 640 megawatt electric generating plant in the U Zoning District, which project is to be known as Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station, is hereby extended for an additional 12 months, which would now expire on February 6, 2003. C. The property on which this Conditional Use Permit Extensiòn is being granted is described as follows: Parcel A A portion of land lying within Section 31, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Commence at the southwest corner of Section 31, Township 35 South, Range 40 East; thence run north 89°57'18" east, along the south line of the southwest 1,4 of said Section 31 for a distance of 1005.74 feet; thence departing said line run north 00°02'42" west, for a distance of 49.50 fe~t to the Point of Beginning, said point being a point on the north line of the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal NO. 102, said point also being a point on a curve concave southwesterly, having a radius of 3336.33 feet, a Central Angle of 14°41 '59", a chord bearing of north 29°01 '09" west and a chord length of 853.62 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, an arclength of 855.97 feet to a Point on the southeasterly right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad; thence run north 44°44'24" east, along said southeasterly right-of-way line for a distance of 1495.22 feet; thence departing said line run south 45°15'05" east, for a distance of 334.48 feet to a point on a line lying 1035.50 feet south January 15, 2002 Page 2 Resolution 02-029 Duke Conditional Use Extension 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 D. 32 33 34 35 36 37 E. 38 39 40 41 F. 42 43 44 45 46 47 ~ '-' of and parallel to the north line of the south Y2 of said Section 31; thence run south 89°59'47" east, along said line for a distance of 1180.27 feet; thence run south 22°32'03" west, for a distance of 1701.80 feet to a point on the aforementioned north line of the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 102; thence run south 89°57'18" west, along said north line for a distance of 1404.02 feet to the Point of Beginning. Together with: Parcel B: A portion of land lying within Section 31, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Commence at the southwest corner ot said Section 31; thence north 89°57'18" east, along the south line of said Section for a distance of 2409.76 teet; thence departing said south line run north 00°02'42" west, tor a distance of 49.50 feet to the north right-ot-way line of the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 102 and the Point ot Beginning; thence north 22°32'03" east, for a distance of 1701.80 feet to a point 1035.50 teet south of the north line of the south Y2 of said Section 31; thence south 89°59'47" east, along said south line for a distance of 87.43 teet to a point on a curve concave southeasterly having: a radius of 744.49 feet, and a central angle of 23°25'14" and a chord bearing of north 36°49'24" east; thence along the arc of said curve an arc length of 304.32 feet; thence south 41 °27'59" east, for a distance of 417.49 feet; thence south 00°03'39" west, for a distance of 1500.00 feet to the north right-of-way line of aforesaid Canal 1 02; thence south 89°57'18" west, along said north right-at-way lien for a distance of 1195.68 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 99.5125 acres, more or less. (Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately one mile south of the intersection of Glades Cut-Off Road and Selvitz Road.) The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution for the purpose of obtaining building permits on this property, shall expire on February 6, 2003, unless the developer has obtained a building permit for this project. Pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, no further extensions of this Conditional Use Permit are available. Pursuant to Section 11.02.08 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, this Board approved six conditions for the Duke Energy F1. Pierce Generating Station within Resolution 01-007. Pursuant to Section 11.02.08 of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, this Board at the January 22, 2002 public hearing approved the followin~modifications to Resolution 01-007: 1. Prior to tho issLJanoo of any building pormit£¡ for tho proposed strLJoturo or Bl:lilelings on tho Gita, Within sixtY (60) daw of site mobilization. all exotic vegetation found on the site shall be removed. January 15, 2002 Page 3 Resolution 02-029 Duke Conditional Use Extension .~ ..., 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 2. The applicant shall connect to central water and sewer services upon the installation of central water and sewer lines from the project site to Midway Road at its intersection with Milner Road. The use of the private well for potable water uses shall be discontinued upon such connections, but may be continued exsept for tRe-irrigation use (until such time as an alternative water resource for irriQation is available) and for plant process water. 3. Prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy or other use authorization for this facility, the final plate for that portion of the tho lli!.!sQ ~FlerElV site as shown OR tho al'OposeEl Midway Industrial Park, Unit III, effectina the Duke EnerQY Site. shall have been approved by St. Lucie County, and all required improvements necessary to service the Duke Energy site, consistent with that plat, shall have been completed, or security provided for, in a manner acceptable to St. Lucie County. 5. As part of the construction of this project, the develef3er GRail ~e reE l:IiFeEl te oonstrl:lGt that portion of South Jenkins Road from Environment Way, north to the project entrance shall be constructed. /\11 work iF! t This work is to be GeAe completed or bonded for prior to the i~suance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this project, and may be done as part of the required improvements for the subdivision known as Midway Industrial Park, Unit III. D. The Conditional Use Extension/Major Site Plan granted under this resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Duke Energy Ft. Pierce, LLC., including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to; the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part C. E. A copy of this resolution shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX .~ Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner John Bruhn XXX January 15, 2002 Page 4 Resolution 02-029 Duke Conditional Use Extension 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 "'- Commissioner Paula Lewis xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2002 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY ATTEST: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY H:\Conditional Uses\Duke Energy\ 12202\Res02-029 January 15, 2002 Page 5 ..J .~ Resolution 02-029 Duke Conditional Use Extension '\ AGENDA RQUEST """ ITEM NO. R - 6A- DATE: January 22, 2002 REGULAR [ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: AiI:port Paul Phillips SUBJECT: Approve the amendment of the Environmental Resource Pennit Joint Participation Agreement (JP A) with the Florida Department ofTransportation (FDOT) to allow these funds to be used to reimburse the Sheriff Department ($32,309.41) and the Airport ($12,4 70) for funds spent to date, and allow for the balance to be used for part time security coverage until September 30, 2002. This jp A provides $72,000 ofFDOT funds and $18,000 of Airport funds for a total of $90,000. BACKGROUND: The S1. Lucie County Sheriffs Department provided sheriff deputy patrols 24 hours per day / 7 days per week from the terrorist attack on September 11th through November 13,2001. On November 13th, the Sheriff reduced the patrols to 8 hours per day. Between September 11th and November loth the Sheriff paid $32,309.41 in overtime pay. From November 11th through December 26,2001, the Airport has paid $12,479. To date, $44,779.41 has been spent for enhanced security at the Airport. On November 16th, the Governor signed legislation that authorizes the FDOT to amend JP A's to provide funds for security. Up to 100 percent of capital and operating costs for security at Airports are now eligible under this new program for reimbursement. Previously, no reimbursement for operating costs were eligible. As a result, this new legislation can provide up to 80% reimbursement from FDOT for any security costs incurred or security costs budgeted for the next two years. Please see backup for staff report and flexible funding guidelines. FUNDS A V AILABLE IN ACCT#: Funds of $90,000 are available in the Airport other than buildings account (I 40403-4220-563005-400) PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the amendment of the Environmental Resource Pennit Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to allow these funds to be used to reimburse the Sheriff Department ($32,309.41) and the Airport ($12,470) for funds spent to date, and allow for the balance to be used for part time security coverage until September 30, 2002. This JP A provides $72,000 ofFDOT funds and $18,000 of Airport funds for a total of $90,000. COMMISSION ACTION: IXIAPPROVED [ ]DENIED []OTHER: 5-0 Reviews & Approvals County Attorney: ,\ Originating Dept: Finance:(Check ! trJ OMB "1 (IIlPlt-s¡ Purchasing . I, r Other: Other: opy only, if applicable) CE: , ~ ....I . 51. Lucie County INTERNATIONAL AIR STAFF REPORT from St. Lucie County International Airport To: Board of County Commissioners Paul A. Phillips, Airport Director January 11, 2002 Airport Security Needs From: Date: Subject: As you know, the terrorist attack on 9-11 has brought national attention to security deficiencies at our nation's airports. Although national standards have not been developed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for general aviation (GA) airports, a review of the security measures at St. Lucie County International Airport reveal significant deficiencies. The St. Lucie County Sheriffs Department provided sheriff deputy patrols 24 hours per day /7 days per week from the terrorist attack on September Iph through November 13,2001. On November 13th, the Sheriff, upon consultation and concurrence with the Airport, reduced the sheriff deputy patrols to 8 hours per day from 11 :00 pm to 7:00 am. Since the Sheriff is also providing heightened security in many areas of the County, this patrol has become a significant financial and resource burden on the Sheriff and Airport's budget. As a result, between September 1 ph and November 10th the Sheriff paid $32,309041 in overtime pay. From November 11 ththrough December 26,2001, the Airport has been paying for the heightened security patrols at a cost of$12,4 79. To date, $44,779 Al has been spent for enhanced security at the Airport. On November 16t\ the Governor signed legislation that authorizes the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to amend Joint Participation Agreements (JP A) to provide funds for security. Up to 100 percent of capital and operating costs for security at Airports are now eligible under this new program for reimbursement. Previously, no reimbursement for operating costs were eligible. As a result, this new legislation can provide up to 80% reimbursement from FDOT for any security costs incurred or security costs budgeted for the next two years. The following outlines the proposed measures that may be taken at the Airport: Option 1: NO SECURITY - Obviously, providing no security patrols at the Airport is an option since there is no federal or state requirement to provide armed or unarmed security at GA airport. However, due to the lack of security fencing at the Airport, the Airport is not recommending this option. Option 2: FULL TIME SECURITY - At the Airport, there are over 100 based aircraft owners, and 40 businesses. Since many of these businesses operate seven days a week, the businesses have become the Airports first line of security. Additionally, the U.S. Customs office is manned from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) air traffic control tower is manned from 7:00 am to 9:00 pm. With 600 people currently working around the airfield during various times of day and evening, the Airport is not recommending this option. However, as ~ ~ ~ Congress resumes their discussions of security at GA airport, this may change. To provide a full time security detail manned with Sheriff's deputies to cover 24 hours per day I 365 days per year would require 4 full time sheriff's deputies at a cost of approximately $200,000 per year. Option 3: PART TIME SECURITY I CONTINUE WITH SECURITY FENCING PROJECT - As stated, one of the biggest security deficiencies that currently exist at the Airport is the lack of fencing. Although, the Airport has developed extensively, the installation of fencing has been deficient and access onto the Airport and airfield have remained uncontrolled. The Airport is scheduling a six phase security fencing project. Phase one will be started this month and includes the securing of Curtis King Blvd. Phases two through six will include fencing of the balance of the airfield. Since the security fencing project is in various stages of design and construction, it is staff's recommendation that the part time security currently being provided by the Sheriff's department be continued through September 30, 2002. This would require a financial contribution by the Airport of an additional $44,480 for a total annual cost of $89,259. Since the legislature has allowed for flexible funding of security, it is staff's recommendation that the Board Staff recommends that the Board approve the amendment of the Environmental Resource Penn it Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) with the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) to allow these funds to be used to reimburse the Sheriff Department ($32,309.41) and the Airport ($12,4 70) for funds spent to date, and allow for the balance to be used for part time security coverage until September 30,2002. This JP A provides $72,000 of FOOT funds and $18,000 of Airport funds for a total of $90,000. approve the amendment ofthe Environmental Resource Pennit JP A. The Environmental Permit JP A provides $72,000 of the $90,000 for pennitting at the Airport with $18,000 of Airport funds. It is staff's recommendation that Board authorize the Airport to allow these funds to be used to reimburse the Sheriff Department ($32,309.41) and the Airport ($12,470) for funds spentto date, and allow for the balance to be used for part time security coverage until September 30, 2002. If you have any questions or require any additional infonnation, please do not hesitate to contact me. , ~ '" ~ Guidelines for Implementation of Flexible Airport Funding (Senate Bill 48-B) Revised November 20, 2001 Background On Friday, November 16, 2001, the Govemor signed legislation that authorizes the airport flexible funding program. The law went into effect immediately, so the airports can now request funding under the new flexible guidelines and the district offices can issue or amend grants under this program. The Governor and the Legislature intend that the Department allow maximum flexibility with aviation program funds to assist airports though near term-financial difficulties. The goal is to ensure that Florida's airports can fulfill their role in the recovery of Florida's economy. The objectives are to encourage better security at Florida's airports, assure that the airports function efficiently and encourage air passenger confidence. Discussion September 11th dealt a critical blow to our nations airports. Florida airports are no exception. In the first few weeks after the tragedy, airport operational costs jumped dramatically and airport revenue declined just as dramatically. Increased costs are due, primarily, to increased security personnel. Decreased revenue is due to reduced traffic. In the days after airports resumed operation, traffic was 20 percent to 30 percent of normal. Two months after the tragedy, passenger traffic at Florida's airports is still 23 percent below the comparable time last year. A few days after the tragedy, offices under the Governor conducted teleconferences with the directors of each large and medium hub airport to assess issues and determine how the state could help. This is when the concept of ternporary assistance to cover lost revenue and increased operational costs was developed. The Florida Airport Managers Association Board of Directors met with the Governor and discussed the details of necessary legislation. Both the Legislature and the Governor are aware of the critical role that aviation plays in the Florida economy. It is the intent of both the Legislature and the Governor to do what is necessary to return airports to a firm financial footing and assure travelers that air transportation is safe. This requires a flexible funding program and maximum Department cooperation with airport management. Guidelines 1. Up to 100 percent of capital and operating (operating and maintenance) costs for security and reduced revenue subsequent to September 11th are eligible under this program. Operational and capital costs do not have to be directly related to security to be eligible. · ~.. -J 2. Two fiscal years are included in the legislation, the current fiscal year, FY 2001-02, and next fiscal year, FY 2002-03. It is not legislative intent to obligate funds beyond FY 2002-03 so that they would be included in flexible funding, e.g. through pre-qualified JPAs, etc. However, all state funds currently available for airport use are eligible for the program even if they were appropriated in a prior fiscal year. 3. Both commercial service and general aviation airports are eligible. 4. All capital and operating expenses subsequent to September 11th are eligible even if the expenses were incurred prior to the signing of the legislation and prior to Department approval of an expense plan. 5. In the interest of equity for the airports, the Department cannot shift program funds from one airport to another without full agreement of the airport that would lose funds. Each airport has a right to flexible use of the funds that are currently programmed for that airport. 6. Airport requests for funding for eligible projects must be supported by an expenditure plan. The Department must approve the plan prior to approving the projects and providing funds. Expenditure plans submitted to the Department for approval must be authorized by the airport owner (city commission, county commission, authority). Expenditure plans do not need to be lengthy or complex and should be taken at face value. They should simply explain the reason for the need and describe any support documentation that could be provided to the Department, if requested. 7. Salary increases for existing staff, staff bonuses and similar expenses are not eligible items. 8. Prior year grants that have unexpended funds can be amended to allow capital and operating costs and up to 100 percent funding for this program. 9. If an airport wants to expend airport funds according to these guidelines and credit the expenditures against outstanding aviation program loans, this is eligible under this program as long as an expenditure plan is approved by the Department. 10. District office staff must clearly explain to each applicant that this program does not include additional state funding for airports. Any state funds used for operating costs under this program will not be available for previously programmed capital projects. The deferred capital projects can be reprogrammed further out in the work program out years if funding is available. 11. Under this legislation, work program phases can be changed to reflect operating costs and new work program items can be added by the district offices. Merely make the changes in the work program. No further approval is required as long as the changes accommodate projects that qualify under the legislation. Quick work program changes and JPA processing are the objective for these projects. District office work program questions can be directed to Pollie Howell. 12. Copies of expenditure plans that are approved by the districts for Department funding, the related work program item numbers and the amounts shall be forwarded to the State Aviation Manager so that reports can be prepared for Legislature. :~Inez Ward- 020122 ~r OptionsiJresentations.agd.wpd .__._._~~.~~-~.~~ ......- -~-- Page 1 I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. R - 6·(3 DATE: January 22,2002 REGULAR [ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Airport Paul Phillips SUBJECT: Accept the radar consultant's report and conclusions and provide for the installation of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certified Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System (STARS) LITE terminal display system as the most appropriate low level radar coverage at S1. Lucie County International Airport. BACKGROUND: please see attached report from radar consultant FUNDS AVAILABLE IN ACCT#: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Board approve the preparation ofthe radar study. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board concur with the consultant's conclusion and provide for the installation of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certified Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System (STARS) LITE terminal display system as the most appropriate low level radar coverage at St. Lucie County International Airport. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ]APPROVED [ ]DENIED ~OTHER: No formal action needed. Reviews & Approvals County Attorney: OMB Originating DePt;4?/~rther: Finance:(Check for Cop only, if applicable) .;, Purchasing Other: - -- \ '-" "w1I ITEM NO. 1 A DATE: January 22. 2002 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR: (X) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: ( ) SUBJECT: Duke Energy North America (Duke Energy) Tax Abatement Request TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board of County Commissioners approved the re-zoning for the Duke Energy project on February 6, 2001, and also the construction of the plant on that date. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting direction on whether or not a letter of intent should be sent to Duke Energy offering the requested 3-yeartax abatement program. Staff is concerned that approval ofthis application may lead to additional applications by companies that are similarly situated. }(J APPROVED o OTHER: (3-2) o DENIED (Barnes and Coward - no) ~ COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Approvals 9. County Attorney: 9. Management and Budget: 9. Purchasing: 9. Originating Dept: 9. other: Q Other: Q Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the Sf. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 561-462-1777 or TTD 561-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting, H :IWINIWPIAGEN DA IDukeEnergy.w pd \. '-' "" COUNTY ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM 02-11 ~#&i';i'W'_l _c:¡;~~ "<\:^,::^,-~-' %~~~ '" ~1 TO: Board of County Comm FROM: Douglas M. Anderson, DATE: January 16, 2002 RE: Duke Energy North America (Duke Energy) Tax Abatement Request Duke Energy has requested a partial 3-year tax abatement on the 640 megawatt electric generating facility that they are proposing to construct in St. Lucie County this year. Duke Energy originally requested a letter of intent indicating the County's position regarding this request on January 12, 2001. At that time, they were requesting a 1 O-yeartax abatement totaling approximately $16,000,000. On June 18,2001, Jeff Furst, Property Appraiser, determined this request does not meet the definitions of the law for tax abatement. However, it is my understanding the courts have now clarified that electric generation facilities do meet the State definition for qualification for tax abatement. At this time, Duke Energy is requesting a letter of intent from the County stating that once the project is constructed and Duke Energy is qualified to apply for a tax abatement, that they would be granted by the County, a 3-year, 75%, 67%, 33% abatement. Duke Energy has agreed that should they close the plant within the next 15 years and relocate the facility to an area outside of 8t. Lucie County, any abatements granted by the County would be refunded to the County. Other power plants have had discussions with the Property Appraiser regarding this abatement. They have stated that any future expansion by their companies in 8t. Lucie County could result in a similar tax abatement application if Duke Energy's request is granted. One of the reasons that Duke Energy has reduced their request to 3 years is because Duke Energy is sensitive to the County's concern that the County may have to grant similar considerations. I have had conversations with CPV CANA, LTD., and their position is attached. Staff is requesting direction on whether or not a letter of intent should be sent to Duke Energy offering the above outlined tax abatement program. Staff is concerned that approval of this application may lead to additional applications by companies that are similarly situated. c: Jeff Furst, Property Appraiser Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney Dennis Murphy, Interim Community Development Director Noreen Dryer, Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster & Russell, PA , I , ) /. ~" ~' )." \/ .- ¡ / . 'ì~ . _~,'/F- ,;..7 ¡", L " H:IWINIWPIAGENDAIDukeEnergy,wpd ....... .....I CPV CANA, LTD. 1903 S. 25th Street, Suite 201 Ft. Pierce, FL 34947 (561) 465-4208 January 15, 2002 Re: CPV Cana, Ltd. Electric Generating Facility /4 Vv' 11 ie/I (1 ,- ¡,/ ? ~I' VIA HAND DELIVERY Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator S1. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave. F1. Pierce, Fla. 34982 Dear Mr. Anderson: As you know, CPV Cana, Ltd. is in the process of obtaining permits and approvals for a new 250 MW Combined Cycle Electric Generating Facility in S1. Lucie County. In addition to being one of the cleanest and most efficient proposed generating facilities in Florida, CPV Cana could add up to $120,000,000 to the County's tax base while using virtually no County services. We are proud to be a "good neighbor" by making such a substantial contribution to the County's tax revenues. During the review of our rezoning and conditional use applications, we received specific questions about the tax benefits of our project from several County Commissioners, as well as County Staff. In response, we would like to advise the Board of County Commissioners that CPV Cana, Ltd. will not seek "tax: abatements" from the County. CPV Cana, Ltd. will honor this commitment provided that the County does not grant tax abatements to other energy producers. We believe that there should be a level playing field among electric power producers, so that if one company is granted a tax incentive, its competitors should receive the same consideration. I would be pleased to discuss this with you at any time. Sincerely, fJ ./W1 Peter J. Podurgiel Vice President and Project Manager cc: Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner CliffBames G:\03584\7\Revised CPV Ltr to County Administrator.doc - . . ,-,I" (. ......, -.~ ~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM 02-05 ~.. A..'" ..._.... fi_"_~J<I "i"''''~t''_'''JeM<''''~~'~~';''"" ~.""·"''''''~''_.'''''''Þ .'''''~~-'''''''''''-''~''.,''''''''''-'--------~ FROM: Board of County Commissioners - . ~ 'v.1'<- Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator \f"'-' TO: DATE: January 10, 2002 RE: Duke Energy Tax Abatement Request On January 5, 2002, I provided you with the revised Tax Abatement Report from Duke Energy. As noted at that time, they are requesting a 3-year Tax Abatement: Year One - 75%, Year Two - 67%, Year Three - 33% Abatement. The total Abatement over the 3- year period is estimated at $2,933,952. I have attached an "Abatement by Fund" that totals this number. The total estimated proposed taxes paid by Duke Energy, using today's tax rate and accounting for depreciation, to the St. Lucie County Taxing Districts (i.e. School Board, Fire District, etc.), over a 30-year period, prior to this Abatement, is $83,202,567. Therefore, if the Abatement is approved, the Taxing Districts would net an estimated $80,268,615. Duke Energy has requested that this be placed on the January 22, 2002 Board Agenda, requesting a Letter of Intent be issued to Duke Energy stating that the County is willing to offer this Abatement Program. DMNam c: Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney Jeff Furst, Property Appraiser Dennis Murphy, Interim Community Development Director Patti Tobin, Economic Development Manager Noreen Dryer, Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster & Russell, PA Attachment cr. ..J .......... 8 :3 :3 :3 :3 8 0 :5 8 :3 0 - " ~ '/l <:> v-! If) ~ ::> '" 'r¡ M r- '/Ì -:i N Ó c-. ~ 'r) "" "'" '" '" <,,", ".-, t", N N N ß~ "" .- c: ~ ~ .- <;I) ;.. r'1 00 \"1 ,~ g -:t r- (", '" -= 0"1 .- ..r ;0 N IT) 00 .- ;.. 'rI N 00 "t f"Õ C1'. r- '"" ('1 ~ " O'Õ \(;) M ::£ ,,,.;' Ñ Ô r-: 0 Q U '" 'I) 'I) 'rI '<t .q- "<t .q- r'1 , CI = 'ü - u ::: ~ :is ..J í..ì ~ - r.r. !:, 0 C 0 <:> 0 0 <:> 0 <:> <"> 0 0 0 0 ::> 0 0 0 0 :; 00 <'I ~ 0 N \O^ 00 <'I ":!' ";; .,¡ ..ç t"'. M N^ - Ô Ô ,:r;, - - .- ;) ... ~ - Q(J \0 I") -..0 "" r- "" r- 0\ - "" ..... :-- 0 0 M M .... ..... 00 ¡,., O¢ \0 CI). ~ O\^ .- Ô oo~ r-~ '^ ",,^ N .- 0\ r'1 I") N N N N N N - ": 00 -:t 00. '<t 00 r<") \0 N V\ r- OO 0 v-, r- N ~ 0"1 ~ t"-. ..... 0 - r- 0\ ..... \0 ~ M~ vi r-- 00" e Ñ .q-" -.;t r- '<t .- 00 '<t '" \0 It; Vò 'r, -:r ~ ;) U 0 0 0 0 0 0 <:> <:> <:> I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tea ...... 1.0 V\ ...... \0 00 1'-. '" CI '" O\~ r-~ vi N" o· r: N~ ~ 'r::; i .- or. . ..., -:t -.;t '<t '<t '<t r<") ....., r<") ::I ;.. ~ ,.J :: ...: ¡: VJ - U") ~ ..... ..... 0 00 0\ 00 '" I'- 00 0\ 0 .- N ..... ~ II") \0 ~ '11 ':t M V'> -=t V"I r- .; r-.: ö r-.: ö r-.: <:> r.: C; 0 00 e- '<t "" 0 Ó\ -..0 "<t M M M n M N N , " .¡; j - ;.r¡ .., - = ~ Ë .. ~ ~ ~ "$. ~ ~ ~ '.0 '<fi. ~ ~ ,0 ~F:. "$. ~ ~ ~ ~ ,0 ~ "$. ;.; '" 0 'r; e- M 2:; ß S 0' " 0..... ë:; - 0 r- '" ..... 0 <:::> 0 0 ::> °10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Co. ... -;:¡: I '. \..t( t """" ~. .J 1h~ m RUCEN MCCLOSKY SMITH SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, RA. ~Œ I;~R ~ ~ ~o~~ 145 NW CENTRAL PARK PLAZA SUITE 200 PORT 5T, LUCIE, FLORIDA 34966 By (56]) 340-7761 FAX: IS6n 340·0B04 NSD@RUDEN,CDM ATTORNEYS AT LAW Noreen S. Dreyer -- . ~-.-.. ~ Re: Duke Energy Ft. Pierce, LLC Application for Economic Development t\ ______-"ò'C;..,- January 12,2001 Mr. Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue . Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Dear Mr. McIntyre: Our client, Duke Energy Ft. Pierce, LLC ("Duke"), proposes to build a new 640 megawatt electric generating facility in St. Lucie County to be known as the Duke Energy Ft. Pierce, LLC Fort Pierce Generating station. Applications for this facility have been submitted to the St. Lucie County Community Development Department and are currently under review. Assuming that all necessary permits can be obtained, part of Duke's final decision to construct this facility in St. Lucie County will include an analysis of the economics of doing so. We are therefore requesting an Economic Development Tax Exemption pursuant to Article V of the St. Lucie County Code and Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes. As a new manufacturing plant that ""ill provide at least 10 new jobs for 10 full time employees, we request an exemption under the "new business" category. Enclosed is a completed Application, together with additional information regarding the benefits of this project to the community and an opinion from James M. Ervin, Jr., Esquire, that an electric generating facility is eligible for an exemption under Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes. We would like the County to consider our request for an Economic Development Tax Exemption and to provide us with a letter indicating its intentions in this regard, at its meeting of ,.., February 6, 2001, at which time our request for development approval is also scheduled to be \-:,L 0 J.::.' y: .~v ~.r:\·A··' C~\'2 PSL: 1888:3 .Ji U / ,-r- \ ¡ \)(:~\' ';" .~- '.~- ~~.~)\~ \...t. ......1 January 12,2001 Mr. Daniel S. McIntyre Page 20f2 heard. Upon completion of the facility, we will provide more detail as to the value of property for which the exemption is requested, so that the appropriate ordinance can be adopted. Please let me know if you need any additional infonnation for the County to favorably consider our request, or if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Very truly yours, RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. Noreen S: Dreyer NSD/ ckc Enclosures cc: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director (with enclosures) Dan Runyan PSl: 1888:3 '-' ....I .. Duke (4f Ener9¥. Nartft Jtmerica,.. A Du~ En"lJ Cgmp""J Duke Energy North America, LLC 5400 W<srheim<r COUrt Housron, TX 77056-5310 PO, Box 1642 Housron. TX 77251-1642 (713) 627-6500 Application for Economic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Duke Ene.rgy Fort Pierce, LLC Duke Energy Fort Pierce, LLC (UDEFP") is requesting an Economic Development Tax Exemption pursuant to Article V of the S1. Lucie County Code and Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes. As a new manufacturing plant that will provide at least 10 new jobs for 10 full time employees, DEFP requests an exemption under the "new business" category. The following information is provided to support the DEFP application. Project Location D£FP proposes to construct and operate the 640-MW Ft. Pierce Generating Station in east-central St. Lucie County, Florida (see Figure 1). The proposed site is located approximately 5 miles southwest of central Fort Pierce, northwest of the intersection Midway and Selvitz roads. The project site is located within Section 31, Township 36 South, Range 40 East and Section 31, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, on the "Fort Pierce" and "Fort Pierce NW" U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) 1 :24,000 topographic quadrangle maps (see Figure 2). The site is identified as that portion of St. Lucie County Tax Parcel Number 2431-411-0001-000/9 identified as Lot 7 and Lot 8 of the Midway Glades Mixed Use Activity Area (see Figure 3). The site occupies approximately 99.5 acres and is bounded to the west by the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway and Glades Cutoff Road, and to the east by unoccupied pastureland. The North St. Lucie River Drainage district Canal 102 bounds the site to the south, and the proposed location of the Ft. Pierce Utility Authority Mainland Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) bounds the site to the north. Surrounding landowners are shown on Figure 4. The site lies within unincorporated St. Lucie County and contains no existing onsite facilities. Most of the site is pastureland (see Figure 5) with some palustrine emergent wetlands. The site is currently owned by Midway Properties of 81. Lucie County under an option to purchase by DEFP. '--' .....1 .1 -I --.. "1 (j .. I / I ,; +.,L f------- I I EXHIBIT 2-1 Re9iooal Map Preliminary Water Supply Scoptng Study St Lucie County. Florida f:1W11»QAA"Q(".M.r" St. Lucie Project Site 6 ~ ,. '" ~ ~ " i ~;.-r~'-- ;:r, .... .... I ,. .. '. /~-;J'-~~~-:;': ,.;!~; ~ "'pprOQm31e Scale in Miles , o , 4 8 CH2MHILL Figure 1: Project Site identified on a Map of the $1. Lucie County Area ·,:;=:.~;::==~i::,:~:~==:~ _.... --- '" '. "'::¡. --- 25__ ....,'~ '=r-- J _ ! .. '.-. J '-. ." "1 ~ -IS --... ò -' /' i\ / ) \....;:.... ,=., l f2. '. ",-2/ '41 .. -*------- , ' // " II ...---~~<.. ~~? ~ , H«~.l )-, ·";;;~¿""1'0 .- T2! ~. r-- .........'Æ;/.. ~ì/ -- 91.12:../_ " ~© i ....= ~ ""ã-"'- "')" -- , I" ~ L.... U" '';. ,,~~_~:~<f)::'" l' \~I '( [, oj I, I!. I 7 ft- '"~...... ..~....._....-....... ~~ . ~F / I ~i """'1'" I I FPUA = I WWTP = 1___= rr"'. --.' ,::) ! 1·.- Source-USGS, Ft. Pierce; USGS, Ft. Pierce NW "":2~ 1 I : ¡ . *. -~_...-,,'¡ , ,,-," ..'-_ i /~\_" ,þ'- , ~'t";{~" ,,' ") ;' \ 3.L' 12 ~ ' \ :; \ \ \ \ f.) \ " "I FLORIDA <>0 /-'1 ¡';':!f ~-:J LEGEND Fl Pierce Utilities AuChority Wastewater TreaCmenl Plant Project Boundary Quadrangle Location , " .:..0.... CH2MHILL E09200000SATl >Fçures,i1dd Figure ·2 Location Map Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station , , , , 't,', I ,', I " I " , , I , , I , , , , I , , I , , , , , , (y' , , 0.> , , .s'<!>o '.o~, V,I", ,,~, ~ ,""'~ , ~/ ""0' ."<7- ''''~ , .y "'~ð' " , , , " " , , , , " , , " , " " " , " " " " , " , " " -I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I Ie; I: I::: to lfii ¡ü I I 1 I 1 -_I ,- ~ " ~ '" OJ ~ ~ " õ<C -'''' <D peoè Z¡1^la~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I '" OJ N~ " õ<C -'", '" '" '" "'~ õ~ -'", M ., '" OJ_ õ~ -'0 v '" "'",,,, ÕMU -' « I 1\ '" 1- \ c '" 1 '" ....t; E -0<{ I '" '" 0", ., '" 0 -', to ~ 0 ,..,e 1 w õ~ -' ó I a.. z -'en u. -;; N m I ~ c to ã I ~ Ü ~I ~ a.. I-~ ~~ <CO<{ ~'" o..~ u. 'ê '" "0 :> 13 .£: õ ~ W I- Cf) I- U W -, o [t: a.. 81 , ~I 11 ~I ~I ~I ro CL 0..1 ~I ~I 1-1 I .1 I I " " , , , , , , " ., '" "'~ ã~ -',.., '" o o '" ..... ..... ò ..... ~oa.......... If.,ç." ./ )eç. eÒ// o<.¡rf.-, <l\/I / I / "/ l-g , <. õI]! , \~ , 1 "~ , , ~ "'ÕÎ -", "'u. .Ec x__ 12", 0.-;; o.u «(/J o o '" o ..,.I - I ê:' co ê:' -0 C ro ::> -0 0 o ro :z co c ::> W ~ 0 C) ~m w ·0-- .J ~ 0 (L ...J I I ..... ..... , " ~ ~.Q :2<ij ~Q)èi5 g, C75 OJ -- ~ u. "'" ~ <¡) ~ <¡) '-9 (j) ~ <¡) a:: u: "'" e> (j) ~ LU <¡) ->c: OJ a ~ ..J:g :r:~ II:: .'z c:~ N~ :z:~ C.)~ '--' ~ "1;) c 0 '" 0 ffi m ts ~ ... w .Õ' -' ð: I ~I ,q ~n~: .. """" W")o:;. ~ g.~ II N ~ ::; ~ç;¡ ~2~ -g:§ h.. ..;¡) .t: -C ~ >.1"<.9 h.ê SI .. ~ê[ ã:-.: '?, ....' 5jt; -<; .Q, ,* ¡ß w~ g~ 1~-Q D. :f"! r~ ~~ :c~ (,)~ \Q .t:: p., C':I 6'0 o Õ .t:: P-. ca .¡:: o -< .-ê CIJ V'} o .... ;j öO ~ ....... ....,I Legal Description of Project Site The site is composed of approximately 99.5 acres, designated as Lot 7 and Lot 8 of the Midway Glades Mixed Use Activity Area (see Figure 6). A legal description of the project site is as follows: A portion of land lying within Section 31, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Commence at the southwest comer of Section 31, Township 35 SDuth, Range 40 East; thence run N.89°57'18"E. along the south line of the southwest % of said Section 31 for a distance of 1005.74 feet; thence departing said line run N.00002'4TW. for a distance of 49.50 feet to the point of beginning, said point being a point on the north line of the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 102, said point also being a point on a curve concave southwesterly, having: a radius of 3336.33 feet, a central angle of 14°41'59", a chord bearing of N.29°01'09"W. and a chord length of 853.62 feet; thence along the arc of said CUIVe, an arc length of 855.97 feet to a point on the southeasterly right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Rail Road; thence run N.44°44'24"E. along said southeasterly right-of-way line for a distance of 1495.22 feet; thence departing said line run S.45°15'05"E. for a distance of 334.48 feet to a point on a line lying 1035.50 south of and parallel to the north line of the south V2 of said Section 31; thence run 5.89°59' 47"E. along said line for a distance of 1180.27 feet; thence run S.22°32'03"W. for a distance of 1701.80 feet to a point on the aforementioned north line of the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 102; thence run S.89°57'18"W. along said north line for a distance of 1404.02 feet to the point of beginning. Together with: A portion of land lying within Section 31, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Commence at the southwest comer of said Section 31thence N.89°5718"E. along the south line of said Section for a distance of 2409.76 feet; thence departing said south line run N_00002'42"W. for a distance of 49.50 feet to the north right-of-way line of the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 102 and the point of beginning; thence N. 22°32' 03"E. for a distance of 1701.80 feet to a point 1035.50 feet south of the north line of the south V2 of said Section 31; thence 5.89°59' 47"E. along said south line for a distance of 87.43 to a point on a CUIVe concave southeasterly having: a radius of 744.49 feet, and a central angle of 23°25'14" and a chord bearing of N.36°49'24"E.; thence along the arc of said curve an arc length of 304. 32 feet; thence 5.41°27'59"E. for a distance of 417.49 feet; thence 5.00° 03'39"W. for a distance of 1500.00 feet to the north right-of-way line of aforesaid canal 102; thence S.89°57'18"W. along said north right-of-way line for a distance of 1195.68 feet to the point of beginning. Parcels A and B combined contain 4..334,766 square feet or 99.5125 acres, more or less. Parcels A and B combined contain 3,525,529 square feet or 80.9350 acres, more or less, of uplands. "'""' ...I Project Description DEFP is proposing to design, construct, and operate a nominal 640-MW power plant consisting of eight combustion turbine generators (CTGs) and ancillary plant support equipment. The plant will function as a peaking facility and will be designed to operate in simple cycle mode. A simple-cycle combustion turbine consists of five components: an air inlet filter, compressor, combustor, turbine, and a generator. With a simple-cycle, combustion-turbine configuration, ambient air is drawn through filters into the compressor. The air is compressed and exhausts to the combustion section: Fuel and air are then mixed in the combustors where the fuel is ignited. The combustion products enter the expansion turbine. The hot gas expands through the turbine and is then vented out through the stack. Expansion through the turbine results in work to drive the compressor and generator. Approximately 81 MW of gross electric power can be produced by the generator over and above the work required by the compressor. The plant will serve as a peaking facility and will be expected to operate no more than 2,500 hours annually. Project Construction Schedule and Estimated Cost DEFP is proposing (if approved by the Duke Energy Board) to start construction of the Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station in May of 2001 to accomplish the June 2002 commercial operation date. Construction duration is estimated to last approximately 13 months and employ between 150-300 workers during peak construction. Construction costs of the facility are estimated at approximately $210,000,000. Environmental Benefits Duke Energy's conunitment to protecting the environment, conserving natural resources. and safeguarding the health and safety of employees and conununities penneates every area of our operations. Our long tradition of responsible environmental stewardship is recognized by many organizations. Some of the recent environmental awards earned by Duke Energy include: · 1999 Vision and Leadership Award, Milliken and Company · 1999 Partnership Award, Coastal America · 1999 Sanctuary Reflections Award, Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments · 1999 Global Climate Challenge Program Certificate of Appreciation, Us. Fish and Wildlife Service & Theodore Roosevelt IV · 1998 Land Stewardship Award, National Wild Turkey Foundation 8 ~ --' · 1998 Conservationist of the Year, South Carolina Wildlife Federation · 1998 Certificate of Exceptional Merit, National Wildlife Federation · 1997 Voluntary Protection Program "Star" Facility Certificate, OSHA · 1997 Fishery Conservation Award, America Fisheries Society - South Carolina Chapter · 1997 National Land Management Award, Edison Electric Institute The proposed Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station continues the tradition of environmental stewardship. DEFP has gone to great lengths to select and design a site that will have the least impacts on the environment, the surrounding community, and its employees. The Project's primary fuel will be clean burning natural gas. This is the same fuel many American's use for cooking at home and heating water in their water heaters. Natural gas utilization in the combustion turbines significantly lowers the amount of sulfur oxides, metals, and nitric oxides (three of the major pollutants that reduce air quality) compared to coal generating facilities. The plant will produce no visible plume from the combustion turbine stacks and no odors. The Project must also demonstrate that air quality will be protected in order to obtain a permit to construct and operate the facility from Federal and State agencies. The Project will utilize ground water when temperatures exceed 59 of. The annual average utilization of ground water is projected to be very low, approximately 0.27 MGD. Normal operating scenarios will have negligible drawdown effects on the aquifer. The selection and layout of the equipment on the site was reviewed during the planning stages to minimize impact of wetlands and surrounding neighbors. Through this process, only 0.3% of the 18.5 acres of wetlands identified on site will see an impact from the Project. The Project site is located in an already zoned heavy industrial area. In addition, the Project will meet or fall below noise standards adopted by St. Lucie County. Visual buffering was another important feature when selecting a site. This site provides natural buffering that will reduce or eliminate views of the Project from most locations. Community Benefits The proposed Duke Energy Fort Pierce Generating Station will have several positive community benefits if constructed. Outlined below are some of the many benefits St. Lucie County will receive. The proposed Duke Energy Fort Pierce Project represents a significant capital investment in S1. Lucie County, Florida. The Project would rank as the third largest tax paying entity in St. Lucie County based upon the St. Lucie County Tax Collector Top Tax Payers for Tax Year 1999 (this is true even if the Project receives the full abatement under the ordinance). The Project is 9 ~ ~ estimated to generate over $2,000,000 in property taxes during the first full year of commercial operation (if the Project receives the full abatement). If the Project is chosen for construction in St. Lucie County by the Duke Energy Board, the enormous tax revenues generated by the facility will fund several programs. The Project will not result in large increase demands on the existing infrastructure in St. Lucie County, including schools, roads, water systems, fire protection, police, stormwater, and many others. However, the Project will be generating enormous tax revenues for each of these entities. Estimated Tax Revenues from the Project over a 30 Year Time Period · St. Lucie Schools - $37 millìon · St. Lucie Fire District - $11 million · St. Lucie Law Enforcement - $1 million · St. Lucie General Fund (with proposed abatement) - $6 million · Total Property Taxes - $78 million The Proposed Duke Energy Fort Pierce Project would also serve to increase employment in St. Lucie County. The Project will take approximately 13 months to construct. During this time period, between 150 and 300 people will be working to complete the project. Duke Fluor Daniel, DEFP's EPC contractor utilizes the maximum local labor force possible during construction with estimates between 70 and 90 percent. During operation of the facility 10 full time personnel will be employed. Average salaries for full time employees of the Duke Energy Fort Pierce Project will be well above the 1999 St. Lucie County average of $23,000/year. The estimated average salary for the Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Project employees is $55,000/year, nearly 2,5 times the St. Lucie County average salary. It is anticipated that all 10 employees will reside (or already reside) in St. Lucie County. The Project would generate significant revenue for St. Lucie County. It is estimated that the Project would generate over $100,000,000 additional revenue to St. Lucie County over a 30 year period. A significant portion of these dollars would be funding tax programs that the Project will not be utilizing extensively: school, fire, police, and many others. The impact on St. Lucie County infrastructure will be very limited. With the low number of employees during operation, the impact on existing schools, roadways, police, fire, and other civic responsibilities will be very low. The Project will have its own security and fire protection systems. Florida's Electric System reliability will increase as a result of the addition of the Duke Energy Fort Pierce Project. This will create a source of electric energy that is physically located in Florida to produce power for sell to wholesale utilities during periods of peak demand or other 10 '--' ..., periods of insufficient supply. This energy will be competitively priced and wíll only be purchased by the incumbent utilities ifit makes economic sense to do so. The risk for the Project will be placed on Duke Energy shareholders. Proposed Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Duke Energy North America, as the developer for the DEFP Project, wíll evaluate this Project in comparison to several other projects that are each competing for a limited supply of combustion turbines. The evaluation. will look at several factors including: pennits, power market signals, community support, and taxes to detennine which Projects look most favorable, An economic ad valorem tax exemption will provide a clear signal to the Du,.1.æ Energy Board that St. Lucie County supports the Project and wants DENA to construct the facility for the bettennent of the community. St. Lucie County, under resolution 92-24, adopted the economic ad valorem tax exemption and utilized this' measure to attract businesses to the county in the past. DEFP is requesting that St. Lucie County extend this same incentive to attract the construction and operation of the DEFP Project. DEFP is requesting that ninety five (95) percent of the St. Lucie County taxes that are available for exemption be exempt for the proposed Duke Energy Ft. Pierce Generating Station for the first ten (10) years of operation. This exemption would provide both parties with a win- win situation. 11 '-' ...." ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD V ALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION Ordinance No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances Chapter 196, Florida Statutes To be filed with the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, no later than March 1 of the year the exemption is desired to take effect. Please attach additional information if necessary or requested. 1. Business Name and Mailing address: Duke Energy F1. Pierce, LLC 5400 Westheimer Court Houston, Texas 77056 2. Name and telephone number of Owner or person in charge of this business: Name: Larry A. Wall Telephone Number: 713-627-6504 3, Exact Location (Legal Description and Street Address) of Property for which this return is filed: The location of the proposed Duke Energy Fort Pierce Generating Station is located on Lot 7 & 8 of the Midway Industrial Park southeast of Fort Pierce, Florida. The Property legal description is displayed below: A portion of land lying within Section 31, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, 51. Lucie County, Florida. Commence at the southwest corner of Section 31, Township 35 South, Range 40 East; thence run N.89°57'18"E. along the south line of the southwest Y. of said Section 31 for a distance of 1005.74 feet; thence departing said line run N.00002'42"W. for a distance of 49.50 feet to the point of beginning, said point being a point on the north line of the North S1. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 102, said point also being a point on a curve concave southwesterly, having: a radius of 3336.33 feet, a central angle of 14°41'59", a chord bearing of N.29°01'09"W. and a chord length of 853.62 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, an arc length of 855.97 feet to a point on the southeasterly right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Rail Road; thence run N.44°44'24"E. along said southeasterly right-of-way line for a distance of 1495.22 feet; thence departing said line run S.45015'05"E. for a distance of 334.48 feet to a point on a line lying 1035.50 south of and parallel to the north line of the south Y:. of said Section 31; thence run S.89°59'47"E. along said line for a distance of 1180.27 feet; thence run S.22°32'03"W. for a distance of 1701.80 feet to a point on the aforementioned north line of the North S1. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 102; thence run S.89°57'18"W. along said north line for a distance of 1404.02 feet to the point of beginning. Together with: A portion of land lying within Section 31, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, S1. Lucie County, Florida. Commence at the southwest corner of said Section 3lthence N.89°57'18"E. along the south line of said Section for a distance of 2409.76 feet; thence departing said south line run N.00002'42"W. for a distance of 49.50 feet to the north right-of-way line of the North S1. Lucie Rivef Watef Control District Canal No. 102 and the point of beginning; thence N. 22°32' 03"E. for a distance of 1701. 80 feet to a point 1035.50 feet south of the north line of the south Y:. of said Section 31; thence S.89°59'47"E. along said south line for a distance of 87.43 to a point on a curve concave southeasterly having: a radius of 744.49 feet, and a central angle of 23°25'14" and a chord bearing of N.36°49'24"E.; thence along the arc of said curve an arc length of 304.32 feet; thence S.41°27'59"E. for a distance of 417.49 feet; thence S.OO" 03'39"W. fOf a distance of 1500.00 feet to the north right-of- way line of aforesaid canal 102; thence S.89°57'18"W. along said north right-of-way line for a distance of 1195.68 feet to the point of beginning. Parcels A and B combined contain 4,334,766 square feet or 99.5125 acres, more or less. Parcels A and B combined contain 3,525,529 square feet or 80.9350 acres, more or less, of uplands. PSL:2549:1 '-" ...,J 4. Date you began, or will begin, business at this facility: Proposed Commercial Operation, June 2002 (contingent upon Duke Energy Board approval construction starting in May 2001). 5. a. Description of the improvements to real property for which this exemption is requested: Improvements to rcal property include: construction of a single building 90 foot by 60 foot housing thc control room and maintenance area, installation of new groundwater wells, and the construction of a sitc access road. b. Date of commencement of construction of improvements: Proposed construction start date May 2001 (contingent upon Duke Energy Board Approval) 6. a. Description of the tangible personal property for which this exemption is requested and date when property was, or ¡Úo be, purchased: Class of item Age Date of Purchase Original Cost Taxpayer's Taxpayer's Estimate of Estimate of Condition Fair Market Good Avg Poor Value APPRA.ISER'S USE ONLY Condition Electric Generation, Gas Turbines, Simple 210,000,000 X 205,800,000 Cycle +/-15 percent +/-15 percent b. Average Value of Inventory on hand: NA c. Any additional personal property not listed above for which an exemption is claimed must be returned on fonn DR-405 (Tangible Personal Property Tax Return) and a copy attached to this fonn. 7. Do you desire exemption as a: X "New Business" or as an "Expansion of an Existing Business" 8. Describe the Type or Nature of your Business: The Duke Energy Fort Pierce Generating Station will convert natural gas to produce electrical energy. 9. Trade Level (Check as many as apply): Wholesale X Professional X Service Office Other Manufacturing ~_ 10. a. Number of full-time employees to be employed in St. Lucie County, Florida: 10 b. If an expansion of an existing business: (1) Net increase in Employment NA or % (2) Increase in productive output resulting from this expansion: NA % 11. Sales factor for the facility requesting exemption: Total sales in Florida from this facility- One (1) location only Total sales everywhere from this facility-One (1) location only NA NA divided by NA % 12. For office space owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in Florida: a. Date of incorporation in Florida: NA b. Number of Full-time employees at this location: NA 2 P5L:2 549: 1 ~ ..."" 13. If requesting an exemption due to location in a slum or blighted area, please furnish such additional information as required by the Board of County Commission or Property Appraiser: I hereby request the adoption of an ordinance granting an exemption from ad valorem taxation on the above property pursuant to Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes as incorporated by Ord. No. 92-24, SI. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. I agree to furnish such other reasonable information as the Board of County Commissioners or the Property Appraiser may request in regard to the exemption requested herein. I hereby certify that the information and valuation stated above by me is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. (If prepared by,someone other than the taxpayer, his declaration is based on all information of which he has any knowledge.) Date: Signed: (Preparer) Signed: (Taxpayer) (Preparer's address) Title: (Preparer's telephone rrumber) PROPERTY APPRAISER'S USE ONLY L Total revenue available to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources: $ 68,695,677 .12 2. Revenue lost to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year by virtue of exemptions previously granted under this section: $] 06.041 7q 3. Estimate of the revenue which would be lost to the county or municipality during the current fiscal year if the exemption applied for wefe granted had the property for which the exemption is requested othelWise been subject to taxation: none 4. Estimate of the taxable value lost to the county if the exemption applied fOf were granted: o 5. Estimated numbef of St. Lucie County residents to be employed in county: NA Improvements to real property: 0 Personal Property: 0 6. I have determined that the property listed above meets the defmition, as defmed by Section ]96.012(15) or (]6), Florida Statutes, as incorporated by Ord. No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances as a New Business _, as Expansion of an existing business_, or Neither XX 7. Last year for which exemption ma Date: 18 June 01' Signed: RETURN TO BE FILED NOT LATER THAN MARCH 1 3 PSl:2S49:1 '" ....,¡ A Duke rtl1EnerJl~<1J Nortli "America A Duke Energy Company Duke Energy North America, LLC 5400 We,metroer Court Houston, TX 77056-5310 P.O. Box 1642 Houston, TX 77251-1642 (713) 627-6500 Mr. Doug Anderson County Administrator St. Lucie County Florida 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 VIA: Federal Express RE: Duke Energy Ft. Pierce, LLC Dear Mr. Anderson, Duke Energy Fort Pierce ("Duke") submitted an application for Economic Development Tax Exemption to the County Attorney on January 12, 2001 and requested the County provide a letter indicating its intentions with regard to that request. The County Attorney promptly responded and advised that you, the County Administrator, would be handling this issue. Duke has worked with you over the last several months to structure an arrangement that would provide incentives to both parties. Outlined below are the two options that we have discussed and that Duke would be willing to accept. The first option is based upon the table already adopted by the County Commission under Resolution Number 92-264, and simply is to follow the seven year abatement schedule set forth in that table. After many conversations with you and the individual County Commissioners concerning the specific needs of the County, Duke has structured an altemative proposal reflected in Table 1 Column 3. This option provides for a 10 year tax abatement schedule, but couples the abatement with funding assistance to the County in the amount of $80,000 per year for 10 years to assist the County in the development of the Emergency Disaster Center at the Fairgrounds. i~ D ,i [' I, ~ I r: ~. ULJ , I , ¡ co @ŒDWŒ~< 11 : JUN 20 2001 IS! __ ~ I ¡.::::I'~~FFJC~ I .... ~ Table 1 Alternative Proposal Year of Resolution 92-264 Developed from Exemption 7 year schedule Discussion with County Year 1 * 100 % 25 % + $80,000 Year 2 90% 25 % + $80,000 Year 3 80% 25 % + $80,000 Year 4 70% 85 % + $80,000 Year 5 60% 85 % + $80,000 Year 6 40% 85 % + $80,000 Year 7 20% 85 % + $80,000 Year 8' 0% 85 % + $80,000 Year 9 0% 85 % + $80,000 Year 10 0% 85 % + $80,000 Yearll 0% 0% * First Full Year of Operation We also met with the County Property Appraiser Doug Furst, on June 12, 2001, and understand that his report will be forwarded to you Monday, June 18, 2001. We would therefore request that this matter be scheduled for the next available County Commission Meeting. We look forward to your response on this matter in the near future. Please contact me at (713) 627 - 6502 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ç;;\1 fJ- Daniel J. Runyan Project Manager cc: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney Larry Wall, Vice President DENA Noreen Dryer, Attomey 2 .-.. '-' RUDEN MCCLOSKY SMITH SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, RA. 145 NW CENTRAL PARK PLAZA SUITE 200 PORT ST, LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986 ATTORNEYS AT LAW /f)It,P~ (561) 340-7781 FAX, (877) 861-8992 NSD@RUDEN.COM Mr. Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 June 21, 2001 IroJ Œ (; Œ n 1!7 Œ /n)/ I1ù JUN 2 5 2tJD~ ~ I ----J CG, ADMiN Q,c,cICE ¿'~ /.." I LJ: " Re: Duke Energy Ft. Pierce, LLC Application for Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Dear Dan: As we discussed by phone, I am sending you another copy of the Duke Energy Ft. Pierce LLC's Application for Ad Valorem Tax Exemption, I am not certain that the original application we submitted in January had been signed, and have asked the client to provide a signed copy for your files. Please do not hesitate to call me if you should have any questions. Sincerely, RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SC~-ItJSTER & RUSSELL, P.A Signed in the absence of counsel to avoid delay ~ /~ ~ '(;.q !lj¡~ Noreen S. Dreyer Enclosure NSD/ckc f"/ :~.'~~,-_./) ;' ,. \,;,'," c \"'< "'-, - ,. , - '. ,~: -~' \ \ \'~\"\ cc: Mr. Daniel 1. Runyan .:- - ),' ',' ..( Y(\J ,/ PSL:4251:1 FORT LAUDERDALE-MIAMI-NAPLES-PORT ST. LUClE-SARASOTA-ST, PETERSBURC-TALL.>.HASSEE-TAMPA-WEST PALM BEACH \ \ .\ \' '-' ...., ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION Ordinance No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances Chapter 196, Florida Statutes To be filed with the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, no later than March I of the year the exemption is desired to take effect. Please attach additional infonnation if necessary or requested. I, Business Name and Mailing address: Duke Energy Ft. Pierce, LLC 5400 Westheimer Court Houston, Texas 77056 2. Name and telephone number of Owner or person in charge of this business: Name: Larry A. Wall Telephone Number: 713-627-6504 3. Exact Location (Legal Description and Sireet Address) of Property for which this return is filed: The location of the proposed Duke Energy Fort Pierce Generating Station is located on Lot 7 & 8 of the Midway Industrial Park southeast of Fort Pierce, Florida. The Property legal description is displayed below: A portion of land lying within Section 31, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Commence at the southwest corner of Section 31, Township 35 South, Range 40 East; thence run N.89°57'18"E. along the south line of the southwest V. of said Section 31 for a distance of 1005.74 feet; thence departing said line run N.00002'42"W. for a distance of 49.50 feet to the point of beginning, said point being a point on the north line of the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal 1\'0. 102, said point also being a point on a curve concave southwesterly, having: a radius of 333633 feet, a central angle of 14°41 '59", a chord bearing of N.29°01 '09"W. and a chord length of 853.62 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, an arc length of 855.97 feet to a point on the southeasterly right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Rail Road; thence run N.44°44'24"E. along said southeasterly right-of-way line for a distance of 1495.22 feet; thence departing said line run S.45015'05"E. for a distance of 334.48 feet to a point on a line lying 1035.50 south of and parallel to the north line of the south y, of said Section 31; thence run S.89°59'47"E. along said line for a distance of 1180.27 feet; thence run S.22°32'03"W. for a distance of 1701.80 feet to a point on the aforementioned north line of the North St. Lucie River 'Vater Control District Canal No. 102; thence run S.89057'18"W. along said north line for a distance of 1404.02 feet to the point of beginning. Together with: A portion of land lying within Section 31, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Commence at the southwest corner of said Section 3lthence N.89°57'18"E. along the south line of said Section for a distance of 2409.76 feet; thence departing said south line run N.00002'42"W. for a distance of 49.50 feet to the north right-of-way line of the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal 1\'0. 102 and the point of beginning; thence N. 22°32' 03"E. for a distance of 1701. 80 feet to a point 1035.50 feet south of the north line of the south y, of said Section 31; thence S.89059'47"E. along said south line for a distance of 87.43 to a point on a curve concave southeasterly having: a radius of 744.49 feet, and a central angle of 23°25'14" and a chord bearing of N.36049'24"E.; thence along the arc of said curve an arc length of 304. 32 feet; thence 5.41 °27' 59"E. for a distance of 417.49 feet; thence S.Ooo 03'39"W. for a distance of 1500.00 feet to the north right-of- way line of aforesaid canal 102; thence S.89°57'18"W. along said north right-of-way line for a distance of 1195.68 feet to the point of beginning. Parcels A and B combined contain 4,334,766 square feet or 99.5125 acres, more or less. Parcels A and B combined contain 3,525,529 square feet or 80.9350 acres, more or less, of uplands. I PSL:2549:2 """ ....; 4. Date you began, or will begin, business at this facility: Proposed Commercial Operation, June 2002 (contingent upon Du~e Energy Board approval construction starting in May 2001). 5, a, Description of the improvements to real property for which this exemption is requested: Improvements to real property include: construction of a single building 90 foot by 60 foot housing the control room and maintenance area, installation of new groundwater wells, and the construction of a site access road. b. Date of commencement of construction of improvements: Proposed construction start date May 2001 (contingent upon Duke Energy Board Approval) 6, a. Description of the tangible personal property for which this exemption is requested and date when property was, or is to be, purchased: Class of item Age Date of Purchase Original Cost Taxpayer's Taxpayer's Estimate of Estimate of Condition Fair Market Good Avg Poor Value APPRAISER'S USE ONLY Condition Electric Generation, I Gas Turbines, Simple 210,000,000 X 1205,800,000 Cycle +/-15 percent i +/-15 percent t I b, Average Value ofInventory on hand: NA c. Any additional personal property not listed above for which an exemption is claimed must be returned on form DR-405 (Tangible Personal Property Tax Return) and a copy attached to this form. 7. Do you desire exemption as a: ~ "New Business" or as an "Expansion of an Existing Business" 8. Describe the Type or Nature of your Business: The Duke Energy Fort Pierce Generating Station will convert natural gas to produce electrical energy. 9. Trade Level (Check as many as apply): Wholesale..K... Professional L Service Office Other Manufacturing ---X _ 10. a. Number of full-time employees to be employed in St. Lucie County, Florida: 10 b. If an expansion of an existing business: (1) Net increase in Employment NA or % (2) Increase in productive output resulting from this expansion: NA % 11, Sales factor for the facility requesting exemption: Total sales in Florida from this facility- One (I) location only Total sales everywhere from this facility-One (1) location only NA NA divided by NA % 12, For office space owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in Florida: a. Date of incorporation in Florida: NA b. Number of Full-time employees at this location: NA 2 PSL:2549:2 - -.. "" ,.,¡ 13. If requesting an exemption due to location in a slum or blighted area, please furnish such additional information as required by the Board of County Commission or Property Appraiser: I hereby request the adoption of an ordinance granting an exemption from ad valorem taxation on the above property pursuant to Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes as incorporated by Ord, No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. I agree to fumish such other reasonable information as the Board of County Commissioners or the Property Appraiser may request in regard to the exemption requested herein. I hereby certify that the information and valuation,- stated above by me is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. (If prepared bý someone other than the taxpayer, his declaration is based on all information of which he has any knowledge.) ---- ~ Date: -.J ~J7L l ,?-t'-O ( S~"'dc1:t!f!l/( ( axpayer)' Title: _~'(-e- 4ç-èk/11- Signed: (Preparer) (Preparer's address) (Preparer's telephone number) PROPERTY APPRAISER'S USE ONLY 1. Total revenue available to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources: 2. Revenue lost to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year by virtue of exemptions previously granted under this section: 3, Estimate of the revenue which would be lost to the county or municipality during the current fiscal year if the exemption applied for were granted had the property for which the exemption is requested otherwise been subject to taxation: 4 Estimate of the ta.xab1e value lost to the county if the exemption applied for were granted: 5, Estimated number ofS1. Lucie County residents to be employed in county: Improvements to real property: Personal Property: 6, I have determined that the property listed above meets the defmition, as defmed by Section 196.012(15) or (16), Florida Statutes, as incorporated by Ord. No. 92-24, St, Lucie Cou~de of Ordinances as a New Business _, as Expansion of an existing business , or Neither 7. Last year for which exemption may be a¡J Date: 7/lf/o/ Signed: RETURN TO BE FILED NOT LATER THAN MARCH 1 3 PSL:2549:2 'W' AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Admini6tration SUBJECT: Bi-Weekly Committee Report6 ITEM NO....lfL ~ DATE: January 22, 2002 REGULAR [X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: BOCC BACKGROUND: At the April 11, 2000 Board of County Commi65ioner6 Meeting it wa6 decided by the Board to place an item on the agenda, on a bi-weekly ba6i6, to give the Board an opportunity to provide update6 on the variou6 Committee6 and Advi60ry Board5 that they 5erve on. It ha6 been decided by the County Admini6trator that thi6 item will be placed on the agenda on the 2n<i and 4th Tue5day of each month. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Thi6 meeting the Board will provide update5 on the following Committee6 and Advi50ry Board6 that they 6erve on: Committee Blueway Advi60ry Committee Chamber of Commerce Board of Dir. Children'6 Service6 Council Cultural Affair6 Council Friend6 of SLC Library Property & Homeowner6 St. Lucie County Fire Di6trict Tran5portation DLCB Trea5ure Coa6t Regional Planning Council COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] APPROVED [] DENIED ~] OTHER: Reports given Meeting Date Monthly Monthly 2n<i Thur5day 2no Tue6day 2n<i Thur5day 2n<i Wedne5day :3r<i Wedne5day 2no Wedne5day :3r<i Friday Commi55ioner Barne6 Coward Lewi6 Barne5 Lewi6 Hutchin50n Bruhn/Coward Lewi5 Coward/Barne5 ougla5 Ander50n County Admini5trator ~ ..."I AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ~ DATE: January 22, 2002 REGULAR [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION.ERS PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attomey SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-59 - Joining the Children's Services Council ofSt. Lucie County, St. Lucie County School Board, and other governmental agencies in supporting the reform of the current state and local tax system in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: The Children's Services Council of St. Lucie County, and St. Lucie County School Board have requested that this Board join other governmental agencies in supporting the reform of the current state and local tax system and adopt a resolution accordingly. The attached Resolution No. 02-59 has been drafted for that purpose. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-59 as drafted. ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved as amended Remove all except conceptual approval to look into the issue. COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: [Q Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicableJ___ Eff. 5/96 ..... ~ >...I RESOLUTION NO. 02-59 A RESOLUTION JOINING THE CHILDREN'S SERVICES COUNCIL OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, ST. LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES IN SUPPORTING REFORM OF THE CURRENT STATE AND LOCAL TAX SYSTEM IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. The State of Florida is facing economic difficulties due to the events of 9-11 and the current tax system. 2. The best form of government is the government that is closest to the citizens. 3. Local Governmental bodies must work together to empower local decision making that can effectively address the challenges facing Florida's diverse communities. ~"'"tcl 4. Reform and simplification of the state and local tax systemwHtresult in a long-term, sustainable tax structure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby join the Children's Services Council of St. Lucie ~ St. ßv._c-41T"Ø") ,(;,,/,-;: Lucie County School Board, and other governmental agencies in OOfIl'orrtng r€:form of the current State and Local Tax System. 2. This Board recommends that such tax reform include the following principals: a. trality - establishes a tax system that does not discriminate among . .services or create economic advantages among competitive industries. /' "--. ." ..... '-" ....¡ b. Tax fairness - establishes a tax system that treats taxpayers in a similar and fair marmer. c. Stabilization - establishes a tax system that produces revenues in a stable and reliable marmer that is sufficient to fund appropriate governmental functions and expenditures during both good and bad economic times. d. Simplification - established a tax system that provides uniform definitions for taxable goods and services for state and local taxes. e. Revenue capacity - reserves the existing revenue capacity of counties, municipalities and school boards. After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XX Vice Chairman Cliff Bames XX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XX CommissionerJohn D. Bruhn XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 220d day of January, 2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER ~--.. . ,- To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: ~ "" Agenda Request Item Number q Date: January 22, 2002 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg, [ ] [ ] [ X ] [ I Quasi-JD [ Board of County Commissioners Community Development Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan Attached for the Board's input is the second round of the draft goals, objectives and policies for the Port Master Plan. Also attached for the Board's information are the agendas for the three stakeholder meetings held in October and November and recent correspondence between the County Attorney and the Department of Community Affairs regarding the procedure for the adoption of the Port Master Plan. It is our intent at this meeting to solicit the comments and concerns of the Commissioners, since this is the Commission's first opportunity to provide direction and comments on the draft goals, objectives and policies of the Port Master Plan. We will be doing the same thing with the Fort Pierce Commissioners the night of January 22, 2002. It is our goal to solicit the comments and concerns of both entities in preparation for the joint meeting of the commissions on February 19, 2002. This will allow us to focus our efforts at the joint meeting on the areas where there is the greatest difference of opinion. This has been a long and difficult process and we (staff and the consulmnts) know there is room for improvement. This process has included the stakeholder meetings, soliciting comments from the web site and in writing, and Intense coordination with the staff and consultants for the City of Fort Pierce. The difficulty with the project has been the divergent opinions on the general philosophy of what should and shouldn't occur at the port. NA NA Provide staff and the consultants with comments, concerns and areas for improvement with the draft goals, objectives and policies of the port master plan. .. J Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Coord ¡nation/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: ~ '....,/ COMMISSION REVIEW: January 22, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Economic Development Division MEMORANDUM TO: Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator ß/ì Dennis Murphy, Interim Community Development Dire~r 1 Patricia Tobin, Economic Development Manager ~ January 17, 2002 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Draft Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan Attached for the Board's input is the second round of the draft goals, objectives and policies for the Port Master Plan. Also attached for the Board's information are the agendas for the three stakeholder meetings held in October and November and recent correspondence between the County Attorney and the Department of Community Affairs regarding the procedure for the adoption of the Port Master Plan. It is our intent at this meeting to solicit the comments and concerns of the Commissioners, since this is the Commission's first opportunity to provide direction and comments on the draft goals, objectives and policies of the Port Master Plan. We will be doing the same thing with the Fort Pierce Commissioners the night of January 22, 2002. It is our goal to solicit the comments and concems of both entities in preparation for the joint meeting of the commissions on February 19, 2002. This will allow us to focus our efforts at the joint meeting on the areas where there is the greatest difference of opinion. This has been a long and difficult process and we (staff and the consultants) know there is room for improvement. This process has included the stakeholder meetings, soliciting comments from the web site and in writing, and intense coordination with the staff and consultants for the City of Fort Pierce. The difficulty with the project has been the divergent opinions on the general philosophy of what should and shouldn't occur at the port. .~ We await your input on the draft goals, objectives and policies of the Port Master Plan. 'X. '\J" ) "- ~ ~ \J ~ DRAFT #~ -..I Draft OOPs 12/2]/0]+2,1212/21/2001 1 References to the "Port of Ft. Pierce" in the Goals, Objectives, and Policies shall be .~ liberally interpreted to reference the appropriate local government entity charged \'\ with the responsibility for enforcing or completing the specific objective or policy \ statement. The Port of Ft. Pierce Charrette is the vision underlying these goals, . objectives, and policies. ..., ~ DRAFT Goals, Objectives, and Policies for Port of Ft. Pierce Responsibility for the Port The overall responsibility for the ownership and management of the Port of Ft. Pierce should be determined in the public interest of all the citizens of St. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.1 St. Lucie County, in conjunction with the municipalities, shall examine whether to establish an operational Port Authority for the Port of Ft. Pierce to manage public and private port activities. I~ ~~~ ~ ~ Objective 1.1 \~ '" St. Lucie County, working with the City of Ft. Pierce, interested agencies and 'Y} private property owners and consistent with the port enabling laws and the constitutional and statutory protections for the rights of existing private property owners, should ensure that the public interest and quality of life is protected when \. expanding public control of port property. N ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~.'.~ ') \~ ~ 1 ~ ~ .~ ) L ~ " t:\ \ ; ~ ~ ~ Pol;q 1.1.3 r\ 'ì ~ Policy 1.1.2 Unless a legislatively authorized port authority or equivalent management structure is established or created, St. Lucie County shall maintain the necessary oversight over the Port of Fort Pierce to ensure compliance with applicable state law governing deepwater ports and to guarantee the financial feasibility of any publicly funded infrastructure within the port. The Port of Ft. Pierce should determine whether to initiate actions necessary to acquire public ownership of those areas in the port determined to be i~ the public interest. Policy 1.1.4 Unless a legislatively authorized port authority or equivalent management structure is established or created, St. Lucie County should coordinate with the Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council (FSTED) '-" "'-" Draft GOPs 12/21/01~1212/2l/2001 2 'V ~(1'>.' and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to ensure that the needs of the state and region are being addressed in the operations of the Port of Ft. Pierce. Policy 1.1.5 Unless a legislatively authorized port authority or equivalent management structure is established or created, St. Lucie County, operating through its existing and future legal authorities, should initiate discussions with the City of Fort Pierce, with other public agencies, and with the private business sector to create the legal agreements, memoranda of understanding, and joint planning agreements necessary to implement the goals, objectives, and policies of the Master Plan for the Port of Ft. Pierce. Objective 1.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce should establish a general Port Planning Area boundary and a Port Operations Area boundary to provide elected officials, prospective community investors, and the public a clear understanding of the physical location of the activities that could be accommodated in the Port of Ft. Pierce (See Figure A). Policy 1.2.1 The Port of Ft Pierce, guided by the vision and direction of the Port of Ft. Pierce Charrette, shall continue to support cargo operations. Policy 1.2.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce, guided by the vision and direction of the Port of Ft. Pierce Charrette, shall support development of tourist and recreational uses in the northern third of the undeveloped port property. Policy 1.2.3 The Port of Ft. Pierce, guided by the vision and direction of the Port of Ft. Pierce Charrette, shall support development of marine uses, expansion of cargo, or expansion of tourist/recreational uses depending on market conditions. Policy 1.2.4 .' Activities within the remammg Port Planning Area shall comply with the applicable State and County laws and the plans and regulations of the City of Ft. Pierce or St. Lucie County as may be appropriate to the legal regulating authority. ~ -....I Draft GOPs 12/2I101R1212/21/2001 3 Goal 2 Port Activities The quality of life for St. Lucie County residents will be strengthened and maintained by enhancing the economic viability, attractiveness, environmental quality, and social benefits associated with activities at the Port of Ft. Pierce. Objective 2.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce should strengthen the economic development activities in the Port Planning Area by working with state and local government to formulate an economic development plan by 2004 that will foster new jobs that exceed the County's average annual wage. Policy 2.1.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce shall encourage the improvement of port facilities to maximize current potential, including rehabilitation and modernization of existing buildings consistent with the City ofFt. Pierce downtown redevelopment. Policy 2.1.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce will continue as a deepwater port and will accommodate cargo operations. Policy 2.1.3 Public infrastructure improvements in the Port Planning Area should be made consistent with the Port Master Plan. Policy 2.1.4 St. Lucie County, working with state and local governments, will provide incentives for jobs that exceed the County's average annual wage. Policy 2.1.5 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with state and local governments, will encourage port industries to use the local workforce to the fullest extent possible. .~ Objective 2.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce in cooperation with the City of Ft. Pierce and other governmental bodies, shall assist in the development of design standards to ensure that port facilities in the Port Operations Area are compatible with the use of the surrounding area in the City of Ft. Pierce. '-" ....." Draft GOPs 12/21101HI212/21/2001 4 Policy 2.2.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce, in cooperation with other governmental bodies, should develop and maintain aesthetically pleasing public port facilities and landscaping to encourage new and expanded business development. Policy 2.2.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce, in cooperation with other governmental bodies, should ensure that port facilities are aesthetically compatible with newly renovated downtown Ft. Pierce and other adjacent neighborhood areas. Policy 2.2.3 Existing activities within the Port of Ft. Pierce Operations Area that are determined to be inconsistent with future uses of the port should be identified and removed through eminent domain, code enforcement activities, private/public partnerships, grants, or other mechanisms by the appropriate unit of government. Objective 2.3 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with regional and local government and business entities, should maintain, increase, and promote marine industry and related scientific and commercial activities at the Port of Ft. Pierce so there is no net loss of marine industry. Policy 2.3.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other concerned governmental bodies and interested parties, should promote water-dependent marine industry uses such as boat service and repair yards, marina facilities, and related service activities within the Port Operations Area. Policy 2.3.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other concerned governmental bodies and interested parties and guided by the vision and direction of the Port of Ft. Pierce Charrette, should accommodate water-related marine activities such· as restaurants, hotels, and related service activities within the Port PI5Ulliing Area for the benefit of the residents and visitors to the community. Policy 2.3.3 The Port of Ft. Pierce, in cooperation with the City of Ft. Pierce, should protect, maintain, and promote marine industry activity from encroachment or displacement by incompatible land uses. ~ """ Draft GOPs 12/21/01+2-1212/21/2001 5 Policy 2.3.4 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, shall encourage the location of additional marine science facilities in the Port Planning Area that are compatible with the Smithsonian and the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution. Objective 2.4 The Port of Ft. Pierce should allow and support expansion of other types of water- dependent recreational and ecotourism uses in the Port Planning Area. Policy 2.4.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, should encourage recreational uses within the Port Planning Area. Policy 2.4.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce working with other governmental bodies should maintain a public education and information program for the commercial and recreational boating activities on and adjacent to the Port Planning Area to alert and advise those users of the environmentally sensitive resources in the area. Objective 2.5 The Port of Ft. Pierce, in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, should work with appropriate public safety entities to revise the port security management plan for the Port Operations Area by December 2003. Policy 2.5.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce should insure that port security is consistent with existing laws in order to adequately protect port users and citizens from crime or terrorism concerns and to prevent any increase in criminal activity or enterprises. Policy 2.5.2 .~ The Port of Ft. Pierce~ working with other governmental bodies, should develop a public education program for the port security management plan to ensure that the owners, users, other responsible parties, and members of the public understand port security. '" """'" Draft GOPs 12/21/01+2-1212/21/2001 6 Goal 3 Environmental Protection The environmental integrity of the Indian River Lagoon shall be protected by minimizing any detrimental effects caused by current operations and long-tenn development and improvement activities by the Port of Ft. Pierce. Objective 3.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce working with other governmental bodies should ensure protection of the Indian River Lagoon and minimize future degradation of the Lagoon's ecological health due to port activities. Policy 3.1.1 The Port of Fort Pierce, working with other governmental bodies, will require discharges coming from port activities into the Indian River Lagoon to comply with state and federally approved standards for relevant parameters. Policy 3.1.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working through the Comprehensive Plans and Land Development Regulations of the City of Fort Pierce and St. Lucie County, should manage excessive freshwater inflows originating trom the Port Planning Area to minimize their impacts on estuarine salinity, consistent with guidelines being developed by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management District in the Indian River Lagoon - South Feasibility Study Draft (2001). Policy 3.1.3 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, shall limit inputs of suspended materials, nutrient inflows, and toxic substances from the Port Planning Area into the estuary to state and federal approved limits. Policy 3.1.4 The Port of Ft. Pierce shall work with other governmental bodies and interested parties to enforce existing laws and prevent exotic invasive species fçom entering the estuary via ship's ballast and bilge water or cargo. '-' ....., Draft OOPs 12/21/01-b!1212/21/2001 7 Objective 3.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce will work with other governmental bodies and interested parties to minimize detrimental effects on the estuary caused by port activities by supporting estuary diversity and the population of endangered and threatened species. Policy 3.2.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce should work with other governmental bodies and interested parties to preserve and restore seagrass beds and mitigate any pennitted losses to existing seagrass beds caused by port activities to the maximum extent possible. Policy 3.2.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, should protect endangered and threatened mammals, fish, reptiles, amphibians, and invertebrates from port activities in the estuary adjacent to the Port Operations Area. Policy 3.2.3 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, should protect and conserve fin and shellfish resources in the estuary adjacent to the Port Operations Area from damage due to port activities. Objective 3.3 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, should protect and maintain the existing natural coastal areas and resources within the Port Planning Area. Policy 3.3.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations of the City of Ft. Pierce, should maintain or reduce existing air quality emissions from port activities to ensure that new emissions from the port meet applicable air quality standards. .~ Policy 3.3.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, should create a scientific advisory committee, composed of researchers and managers from the Smithsonian Institute, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, and other regional marine research institutions, to provide scientific '-' "'" Draft Gaps 12/21/01+2-1212/21/2001 8 advice on port operations and activities (commercial, industrial and recreational) that may impact the Indian River Lagoon. Policy 3.3.3 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, will develop a list of best management practices for environmental protection which have been used successfully by other ports to ensure efficient and effective management of port operation activities while providing environmental protection. Goal 4 Public Access The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, should enhance public access to the Port Planning Area. Objective 4.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, should develop an integrated open space system to provide public access between those portions in the Port Planning Area that are open to the public and the surrounding community. Policy 4.1.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, should facilitate public access to short-term parking. Policy 4.1.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce should encourage unobstructed public access to designated public fishing areas. Policy 4.1.3 The Port of Ft. Pierce should cooperate with and support efforts of other interested governmental bodies in providing access to unobstructed scenic views of the estuary. ._ Policy 4.1.4 The Port of Ft. Pierce should encourage the City, County, and State to improve and maintain an orderly network of streets and entrances to access port facilities. ~ ~ Draft Gaps 12/21/01+;11212/21/2001 9 Policy 4.1.5 The Port of Ft. Pierce should develop an integrated open space system along the waterfront of the Port Operations Area, with the exception of areas where such access would pose a safety or security concem or where it would interfere with approved port activities. GoalS Emergency Management The public will be protected in various emergency situations through cooperation between the Port of Ft. Pierce with other governmental bodies to achieve maximum levels of safety. Objective 5.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with regional and state emergency management agencies, should identify new and existing procedures to ensure public safety in the event of a hurricane or other natural disaster. Policy 5.1.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce shall comply with the comprehensive emergency management plans of the City of Ft. Pierce and St. Lucie County to ensure safe evacuation of the port during times of hurricane or other disasters. Objective 5.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies, should ensure that adequate procedures are in place to respond to a hazardous material spill. Policy 5.2.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce shall comply with the processes of federal, state, and local governments for safe and expedient cleanup of hazardous spills. Policy 5.2.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce shall cooperate with governmental bodies to provide complete and timely information to the public in the event of .a hazardous materials accident. '" ...".' Draft GOPs 12/21/01+2-1212/21/2001 10 Goal 6 Landside Infrastructure Landside and waterside infrastructure serving the Port ofFt. Pierce should meet the port's future requirements in a manner consistent with the abilities of the agencies to provide the services needed to support approved port activities. Objective 6.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce should work with other governmental agencies to improve linkages between the port facilities and intermodal transportation routes. Policy 6.1.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies and interested parties, should prevent increased traffic congestion in the Port Planning Area and on roadways adjacent to the Port Planning Area consistent with the adopted levels of service in the City of Fort Pierce and St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plans. Policy 6.1.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce should enhance and expand activities that tie the port to the St. Lucie County Airport in order to maximize intermodal transportation connections and facilitate the continued economic growth, development, and vitality of St. Lucie County. Beginning in 2003 and continuing annually thereafter, St. Lucie County shall prepare a State of the Ports Report to demonstrate to the public how activities of both facilities are furthering the quality of life of St. Lucie County residents. Policy 6.1.3 The Port of Ft. Pierce, working with other governmental bodies, should facilitate expansion of public transit to and from the Port Planning Area. Goal 7 Navigation Channels Navigation channels serving the port's maritime and recreational activities should be maintained to meet existing and future needs. ~ \ì « " . j /,' ~., ,. ~1 i .~ Objective 7.1 V ~I" ¡,J ì í0 b +' . ~ \ The Port of Ft. Pierce should modify tlie channel depth a~ecessary to support port activities agreed upon by port property owners, appropriate units of local government, and St. Lucie County citizens. ~ ...,.¡ Draft GO Ps 12/21/0 I-h!-12 ] 2/21/2001 II Policy 7.1.1 The Port of Ft. Pierce should coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Florida Inland Navigation District to provide for the maintenance of the navigation channels, including location of spoil disposal sites. Policy 7.1.2 The Port of Ft. Pierce should coordinate with the U.S. Coast Guard m the placement and maintenance of the navigational aids within the port area. Policy 7.1.3 In case the United States Congress authorizes any necessary expansion of dredging areas beyond the existing channels, turning basins, and anchorages, the Port of Ft. Pierce should coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Florida Inland Navigation District to address such issues. .~ '-" ..""I PORT OF FT. PIERCE MASTER PLAN PUBLIC INPUT WORKSHOPS WORKSHOP I October 30, 2001 5:00 - 9:00 PM St. Lucie County Civic Center, Room 101 OBIECTIVES .:. Explain Workshop Series Process, Scope, and Outcomes .:. Review the Master Plan Process and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process and Technical Requirements .:. Review any Ongomg Activity that would affect Port Planning .:. Explore the Future of the Port .:. Identify and Agree on Key Issues that must be addressed in the Plan· .:. Agree on any Needed Next Steps AGENDA 5:00 Welcome and Introductions 5:15 Review History and Context of Ft. Pierce Port Planning: Need to develop port plan Brief Overview of previous/other efforts (charrette results and city process) 5:45 Review Status of the Consultant Study Structure and role of the Port Master Plan process Preparation of the required data and analysis Updates to the website www.ftpierceportplan.org 6:15 Futures Exercise It is 2010. What activities are happmillg Ùl and aroulld the port? What does tile port look like? \IVIzat effects does it ¡rave 011 and ill the commllninJ? 7:00 Break 7:15 Futures Exercise Debriefing 7:45 Issue Identification VVhat are the issues the commwzity should address through the port plan process? \IVIzat background infomzation (i.e, reports, documents, special cO/zditions, etc.) does tile planning team lIeed to consider to plan wisely for the port? 8:55 Next Steps ,- 9:00 Adjourn :¡4íìi Port of Ft. Pierce Master Plan Workshops Page I v """" INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND On October 30,2001 the F AU Joint Center team preparing the Ft. Pierce Port Master Plan conducted the first of three public workshops to solicit input to be used in preparing the plan. Approximately 95 participants attended the meeting. The purpose of the first workshop was to explore the range of aspirations in the community for the future of the port. to identify the issues that wíll need to be addressed in the plan, and to identify information that community members would like the consultant team to consider in developing the plan. The meeting was facilitated by the Florida Conflict Resolution Consortium and records of the discussions made on easel-paper or in other was during the course of the meeting. This report presents the results of discussions at that meeting, based on transcripts of those notes. More detailed descriptions of the process used for each discussion are presented in the corresponding sections of this report. AGENDA The following agenda was followed during the meeting. The full agenda packet used by participants is available separately from the consultant team. 5:00 Welcome and Introductions 5:15 Review History and Context of Ft. Pierce Port Planning: Need to develop port plan; Brief overview of previous/other efforts 5:45 Review Status of the Consultant Study: Structure and role of the Port Master Plan process Preparation of the required data and analysis Updates to the website 1I"\\'\\',ttl"iercl'l"ortplilllning,lWg 6:15 Futures Exercise. It is 2010. Wltat activities are happening in and around the port? Wltat does the port look like? W/uzt effects does it Juzve on and in the community? 7:00 Break 7:15 Futures Exercise Debriefing 7:45 Issue Identification W/lIlt are the issues the community should address through the port plan process? W/lIlt background information (i.e., reports, documents, special conditions, etc.) does the planning team need tó consider to plan wisely for the port? 8:55 9:00 Next Steps Adjourn .~ Port of FI. Pierce Master Plan Workshops Meeting 1 Summary Report- October 30.2001 Page 3 "" ~ FUTURES FUTURES EXERCISE PROCESS Small Group Discussions AIter the initial presentations of background information, participants formed four small groups, Each small group was asked to discuss and answer the following questions, A facilitator assisted each group with its discussion and recorded its answers on easel-paper. For this exercise, assume it is the year 2010. Imagine the port is fully developed and playing a positive role in the community, From your perspective, how would t/lis look? Please consider the following questions. s VVhat activities are happening in and around the port? S What does the port look like? c; What effects does it /rove on and in the community? Debriefing During the debriefing, the groups were asked to tell each other about their discussions and to compile a common set of answers. Each group in turn was asked to offer one of the ideas it had generated. These were recorded by the facilitators on a common list. This process was repeated until all substantively different ideas had been offered. After this process was completed, participants identified items they all could agree to, and items about which they had concerns. The purpose of the debriefing was to identify in broad terms areas of agreement and areas of difference that would need to be resolved in later workshops. This section of the report presents the results of each small group's discussion, as well as the debriefing. .- Port of FI, Pierce Masler Plan Workshops Meeting I Summary Report - October 30,2001 Page 4 '-" ....,I PORT OF FT. PIERCE MASTER PLAN PUBLIC INPUT WORKSHOPS WORKSHOP II November 14, 2001 6:00 - 9:00 PM St. Lucie County Civic Center, Room 101 AGENDA Objectives · To review the role of the Port Master plan. · To build on the results of Workshop I to identify suggested recommendations for inclusion in the plan as goals, objectives, and policies. · To identify areas of agreement and disagreement regarding suggested recommendations. 6:00 Welcome and introduction Agenda review 6:10 Review of role of the Port Master Plan 6:20 Review of futures and issues exercises results from Workshop 1 6:30 Issues discussions Guiding the future of the port through goals, objectives and policies · Activities · Environmental Issues · Public Access · Disaster Planning · Landside Infrastructure · Navigation Channels · Responsibility for Port .' · Other Topics 8:55 Next Steps 9:00 Adjourn Port of Ft. Pierce Master Plan Workshops Page 1 ""', ~ INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND On November 14, 2001 the FAU Joint Center team preparing the Ft. Pierce Port Master Plan conducted the second in a series of public workshops to solicit input to b~ used in preparing the plan, Approximately 105 participants attended the meeting. Building on the results of the first workshop, the purpose of the second workshop was to identify suggestions that might serve as the basis for draft goals, objectives, or policies in each of the Port Master Plan's topic areas required by Florida rules. PROCESS The meeting began with a brief review of the role of the master plan and of other documents and processes in determining the future of the port. This was followed by a review the results of the Workshop 1. The facilitators suggested that the topics for the Workshop 2 issue discussions would allow participants to address the requirements of Florida rules and the issues raised during Workshop 1. The meeting was facilitated by the Florida Conflict Resolution Consortium and records of the discussions made on easel-pads during the course of the meeting, A more detailed description of the process used for each discussion is included in the corresponding section of this report. This report presents the results of discussions at Workshop 2, based on transcripts of the easel-pad notes. AGENDA The following agenda was used during the meeting. The full agenda packet used by participants is available separately from the consultant team. 6:00 Welcome and introduction. agenda review 6:10 Review of role of the Port Master Plan 6:20 Review of futures and issues exercises results from Workshop 1 6:30 Issues discussions - guiding the future of the port through goals, objectives and policies · Activities · Environmental Issues · Public Access · Disaster Planning · Landside Infrastructure · Navigation Channels · Responsibility for Port ,> · Other Topics 8:55 Next Steps 9:00 Adjourn Port of Ft, Pierce Master Plan Workshops Workshop 2 Summary Report - November /4. 200/ Page 3 \,.r ...."J PORT OF Fr. PIERCE MASTER PLAN , PUBLIC INPUT WORKSHOPS WORKSHOP \111 November 29,2001 6:00 - 9:00 PM St. Lucie County Civic Center, Room 101 AGENDA OBJECTIVES · . To understand the role of the Port Master plan. . . To prioritize issues for workshop discussion order. · · To review the draft goals, objectives and policies and suggest refinements. · · To solicit verbal written, and electronic feedback on goals, objectives, and policies. 6:00 Welcome and introductions Agenda review Review of previous workshop activities 6:10 Review of role of the Port Master Plan 6:20 Individual review of draft goals objectives and policies Please take this time (fiftun minutes) to individually read the draft goals, objectives, and policies. Group selection of priorities for Workshop m discussions Which objectives (or related goals/polides) is most important to discuss tonight. (We will try to focus aur discussion time on those parts of the draft most in need of refinement or modification. Additional comments on other parts of the draft will be solicited uia the websìte www.fiDierceoortDlan.org or on the paper comment forms distributed at this meeting.) 6:45 Discussion of selected objectives (or related goal!!/p~Iicies) This time will be allocated for discussion of the top ranked prioritized objectives (or . related goals/ policies) selected earlier. Some time at the end of this ~on will be reserved for comments on other portions of the draft 8:55 Next Steps 9:00 Adjourn '-' ...." INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND On November 29,2001 the FAD Joint Center team preparing the Ft. Pierce Port Master Plan conducted the third in a series of public workshops to solicit input to be used in preparing the plan. Approximately 95 participants attended the meeting. Building on the results of the first two workshops, the purpose of the third workshop was to review draft goals. objectives, and policies and make suggestions for refinement. The goals. objectives, and policies address each of the Port Master Plan's topic areas required by Florida rules. MEETING PROCESS The meeting began with a brief review of the role of the Port Master plan and the results of Workshop 2. The rest of the meeting was a review and refinement of the draft goals, objectives and policies and identification of anything that might be missing. The meeting was facilitated by the Florida Conflict Resolution Consortium and records of the discussions made on easel-pads during the course of the meeting. A more detailed description of the process used for each discussion is included in the corresponding section of this report. This report presents the results of discussions at Workshop 3, based on transcripts of the easel-pad notes. AGENDA The following agenda was used during the meeting. The full agenda packet used by participants is available separately from the consultant team. 6:00 Welcome and introductions Agenda review Review of previous workshop activities 6:10 Review of role of the Port Master Plan 6:20 Individual review of draft goals objectives and policies 6:35 Group selection of priorities for Workshop III discussions 6:45 Discussion of selected objectives (or related goals/policies) 8:55 Next Steps .~ 9:00 Adjourn ACTIVITIES PROCESS 3 'w .."", The group was asked to review the draft list of goals, objectives, and policies that was distributed in the agenda packet. Participants were asked to select five of the objectives (to include corresponding policies) that the group should discuss at the meeting. Facilitators asked the following question. Which objectives (or related goals/policies) is most important to discuss tOllight. (VVe will try to focus our discussion time 011 those parts of the draft most ill l1eed of refinement or mod([ìcation, Facilitators asked for a show of hands for each of the objectives. The following was the vote for each of the objectives. The number in parenthesis is the number of participants who raised their hand for the objective to be one of the discussion items for the meeting. (60) Obi, 1.1 (18) Obi. 3.1 (32) Obj. 1.2 (7) Obi. 4.1 (42) Obi. 1.3 (2) Obi. 4.2 (26 ) Obi. 1.4 (27) Obj.5.1 (17) Obi. 1.5 (52) Obi. 6.1 (35) Obi. 2.1 (46) Obi. 7.1 (21) Obi. 2.2 (18) Obi. 2. .~ 4 ~ C.onsistency ~.el J:;>£ Detail -3 ""! ~ '"0:: ""! en 0'0 ..... 0 t'Þ ., n .... .~~ õ' :: - 3 '0 ¡;- "'= 3 "'= ¡- n Q :: :: :¡ .... ~ .... õ' :: -- '0 t'Þ ., 3 N -. 0 ::: :: t'Þ _. Co:: clJQ en t'Þ '" "-' ~ ~~. ~ (Ð 3 "C i' 3 CD :::I S' .. Õ :::I > ~ Õ :::I CÞ := t'Þ n Coo t'Þ >- ~ a .., œ. a t'Þ 0 C ;a "C:S :::I a -. t'Þq :: - >- 'C"'1' "S.oo ¡:;. ..., ='/:1:1 õ' 0 :: '" o t'Þ "'=~ t'Þ t'Þ ., - a,g =:a CI.I t'Þ :: .... ;a = =-coo Co c:-c ...._. - - ;a .... Co t'Þ ri ~Ej",= =-"IJQ - .. roe = -~ :== ~ = t'Þ ;a .... 0 ~ _ I: .... -.... .., '" t'Þ Co t'Þ n ~ ....., - a ~n o ;a ~'C n _. a ;- t'Þ - :: - CI.I en "1:1 ~ ... - :31 n .," :::I c:a. ~ CD < CD Õ ." :I CD = .. ::a CD ØQ c ¡¡¡ .. õ = n o 3 Q''C .., ri o=- t'Þ t'Þ t'Þ ~ ." -. ~ ~ ;a n ;-:: .., ;a "'=~ o n ::¡.'" "'= ¡ø :: """"" l~: >< ~ sa ~ - ~ ~ '-1. .. ~ ~-- ~ c:ñ ...".. - t"'" n;a o CI ~ Co ~I:: ;a CI.I -t'Þ ::-n ;a 0 = :: ;a '" IJQ n t'Þ ~ a ;a n .... :: -. _0 .? ~ (':';;) 0:9 -1% ---- .~- ~ ~. (5) s .g} ~ :3 ~ ~ ,~ .~ J_____ ~ æ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, 'ø ~ ~ ,~ -- :¡¡;;.; ~ (5) m .- ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ,('\9 ~ -e: (5)- :e.: ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ K ..-=:- I: ~ ¡ I ~. n,.. o 0 :I n m"5! !. -CDei) ¡CD ::so 0 CD < = :::I CÞ ~ "":c= CÞCD:I "eICD -= DI.. = .- Q CD :I CD ; - - " . \.,-- ""'" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY ATTORNEY Daniel S. Mcintyre Heorher Young ASSISTANT COUNTY ATIORNEY Korherine Mochenzie-Smirh ASSISTANT COUNTY ATIORNEY December 17, 2001 Cari L. Roth, Esquire General Counsel Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: Procedure for Adoption of Port Master Plan for the Port of Fort Pierce Dear Ms. Roth: St. Lucie County needs clarification as to the proper procedure for preparation and approval of a comprehensive port master plan as required by Section 163.3178(2)(k), Florida Statutes. The cited Section requires that each coastal management element of a comprehensive plan is required to include a port master plan for any listed deepwater port within the jurisdiction of the government preparing the relevant comprehensive plan. Based on the statute, it appears that the appropriate procedure is: 1. Preparation of a comprehensive master plan for the deepwater port by the appropriate port authority (in this case, St. Lucie County). 2. Submission of the port master plan to the "appropriate local governm'ent" at least six months prior to the due date of the local governmen-rfor integration into the coastal element. (In this case, the appropriate local government for comprehensive planning purposes is Fort Pierce.) 3. Integration of the port master plan into the overall coastal management element by the appropriate local government (Fort Pierce) and submission to the Department of Community Affairs for review. JOHN 0, ORUHN, Di5rricI No 1 . DOUG COWARD, Dimic, No.2' PAULA A. LEWIS. District No.:\ . FRANNiE HUTCHINSON. Di5rtiCt No, 4 . CLIFF OARNES. Dimic! No.5 County AdminisTroror . Douglos M. Ander!oon 2300 Virginia Avenue . 3rd Floor Admin. Annex · Fort Pierce. FL 34982-5652 . Phone (561) 462-1415 FAX (561)462-1440 . TDD(561)462-1428 · . . '-" ~ Cari L Roth, Esquire December 17,2001 Page 2 By the way of background, all of the planning area which constitutes the port is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Fort Pierce. Under the circumstances, it is the County's conclusion that the County's responsibility is for preparation and submission of the master plan. Fort Pierce's responsibility is review of the master plan and integration into its comprehensive plan. On behalf of St. Lucie County, I would very much appreciate your confirmation of the foregoing procedure. DSM/caf Copy to: Board of County Commissioners County Administrator Community Development Director Economic Development Manager .' - - ,¡ . a " ", '-' STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor STEVEN M. SEIBERT Secretary December 27, 2001 r-r..··- ," --"'I rc ~ ß n Vii Œ f',' -'",..=.~~ ¡ I ~ I UEC 3 I 200/ ¡ ~ , - '--- ----.J ' , C":-'.Ui~; "; Ai'TORNEY I , -i Mr. Daniel S. Mc Intyre County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia A venue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 RE: Procedure for Adoption of Port Master Plan - City of Fort Pierce Dear Mr. McIntyre: The Department is in receipt of your letter of December 17,2001 regarding the procedures for the preparation of the comprehensive port master plan and the integration of that master plan into the coastal management element of the City of Fort Pierce comprehensive plan under Section 163.3 I 78(2)(k), Florida Statutes. We have reviewed your understanding of the procedures and can confirm that your understanding is consistent with the provisions of the statute. Accordingly, we concur with the procedures set forth in your letter. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, ¿;?~41cy5 Richard A. Lotspeich Assistant General Counsel --". r~~ '. ~t,~ VJ~~~ ~O 2 5 5 5 S HUM A ROO A K B 0 U LEV A RD· TAL L A HAS SEE. F LOR IDA 3 2 3 9 9 - 2 1 0 0 ~ ,,~ Phone: 850.488,8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850,921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 f'"V Internet address: http://www.dca.stale.fl.us 'f..¡~ p:J-"G'ïfJp--· -;,: I 0<: r-''-__;~._".i; ':" r n; r UU; JAN J 2002 -~U~;... ..., \ RAL/ms i. _) i r - --.-~ I co, "~.'-"-, \' C,~::--;-- ~.. , ,,' - C-!'.'T C' 'J' l' ,.....,.- C. r...L',Jr..1CI¡ ~. 0, ~.I: CUNTY, FL CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 Marathon. Fl 33050-2227 (305) 289·2402 COMMUNITY PlANNING 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399·2100 (850)488'2356 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee. Fl 32399-2100 (8S0) 413-9969 HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2555 Shurrard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee. FL 32399·2100 (8S0) 46B-7956 '-' .""", ",-- If _r CONS£"NrTr ~ ITEMS ... ... ... . . . BOARD OFT' couNTY COMM[ISSIONE.Rß M££TING 01/18/02 FZABWARR FUND 001 001106 001111 001139 001140 001143 001265 001269 001271 001809 101 101003 101006 101104 102 102001 102104 105 107 107001 107002 " ~7003 122 113 115 116 117 118 119 123 136 140 140121 140309 140310 140319 145201 160 183 183001 183002 183004 184203 185002 310002 315 316 ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...; WARRANT LIST #16- 12-JAN-2002 TO 18-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 (95/96) FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 96/97 FHA Transportation for 21st Century Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 TDC Planning Grant FY01/02 FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 DHR-Historical Museum Grant-In-Aid SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees FHWA/FDOT Hurricane Floyd reimburse Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper USDOJ Ed Byrne Drug FY01/02 Harmony Heights 3 Fund Sheraton Plaza Fund Sunland Gardens Fund Sunrise Park Fund Paradise Park Fund Holiday Pines Fund Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund Port & Airport Fund FAA Taxiway A-3, Airfield Signage Installation #236741-1-94-01 Airfield Signage #408784-1-94-01 FDEP-Airport Park Wastewater 01/02 FCT- Pepper Park Addition Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 Impact Fees-Parks County Building Fund County Capital Rouse Road MSBU Capital EXPENSES 376,604.11 24,379.00 50,075.00 30.67 626.78 5,913.74 219.62 262.11 143.01 265.92 44,898.01 10,536.88 31,636.97 10,855.28 29,163.01 1,332.80 265.34 1,115.72 74,342.68 4,141.10 5,477.05 9,852.55 72,363.00 203.45 450.06 496.68 123.93 723.87 726.67 253.66 1,753.25 20,445.72 182,530.32 7,098.40 13,182.75 300.00 6,408.86 2,495.68 3,378.26 650.08 200.00 677.32 457.56 552.25 16,170.00 913.16 17,247.19 77.20 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 442,672.58 0.00 0.00 400.95 3,479.21 1,204.52 388.26 1,188.80 1,903.63 1,188.80 103,928.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,318.02 4,470.31 1,226.40 2,110.86 89,150.05 829.15 829.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,972.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,364.00 3,666.71 2,099.99 0.00 2,874.61 0.00 2,519.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/18/02 FZABWARR . FUND 401 418 421 441 448 451 461 471 491 505 505001 611 625 "'" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD -...I WARRANT LIST #16- 12-JAN-2002 TO 18-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities Renewal & Replacement Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 88,343.96 24,706.21 41.66 57,149.94 8,751.50 22,707.10 27,015.22 3,301.44 9,078.25 192,354.04 1,141.44 1,985.60 26,033.62 1,494,626.65 PAGE 2 PAYROLL 34,984.83 20,753.28 196.52 4,127.08 0.00 772 . 53 7,083.90 5,207.98 21,164.62 842.40 1,848.02 3,273.88 0.00 835,042.67 "-' ...,J 01/18/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 FZABWARR VOID LIST# 16- 12-JAN-2002 TO 18-JAN-2002 . _LID: 001 - General Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00279869 12207432 Copyco 12207737 12207755 12207899 12207904 CHECK TOTAL: 213.42 137.90 184.37 161.99 137.90 835.58 FUND TOTAL: 835.58 01/18/02 FZABWARR ~ _LID: 1 0 7 CHECK " """ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ~ Fine & Forfeiture Fund VOID LIST# 16- 12-JAN-2002 TO 18-JAN-2002 INVOICE VENDOR 00279869 I2207328 Copyco I2207331 TOTAL CHECK TOTAL: 13 7.90 13 7.90 275.80 FUND TOTAL: 275.80 PAGE 2 ~ -...I 01/18/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD FZABWARR VOID LIST# 16- 12-JAN-2002 TO 18-JAN-2002 lvi~: 140001- Port Fund PAGE 3 CHECK 00279896 INVOICE VENDOR I2207830 PIa Atlantic University FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 59,000.00 59,000.00 '-' "" 01/18/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD F7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 16- 12-JAN-2002 TO 18-JAN-2002 ruND: 401 - Sanitary Landfill Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00279869 I2207750 Copyco PAGE 4 FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 13 7.90 13 7.90 · . "-' '--I 01/18/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 5 VOID LIST# 16- 12 -JAN-2 002 TO 18-JAN-2002 - Building Code Fund FZABWARR LA~D: 491 CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00279869 I2207333 Copyco I2207334 I2207335 CHECK TOTAL: 110.00 110.00 110.00 330.00 FUND TOTAL: 330.00 '-' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM Nà':"'C-2a DATE: January 22, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Director, Parks & Recreation SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Community Parks System Master Plan /Lawnwood Recreation Complex Master Plan Update (Parks Referendum) BACKGROUND: As part of St. Lucie County's continuing effort to assess the parks/recreational needs and wants by its residents, the Board of County Commissioners agreed to secure professional services to assist in the development of a "Community Parks System Master Plan" and a "Lawnwood Recreation Complex Master Plan." At the September 18, 2001 BOCC meeting, the Board agreed to contract with Glatting Jackson to develop both master plans. Atthe Board's direction, a "Steering Committee" was also formed to help guide the process, provide input and work with staff by providing feedback. Since the Dec. 18th update, five public workshops have been facilitated by Glatting Jackson, a staff workshop was held on Jan. 9th and the "Steering Committee" met for the second time on Jan. 16th. Staff met with Trust For Public Lands representatives on Jan. 17th to discuss strategies for successfully getting a bond referendum approved. A public Commission MeetinglWorkshop to provide and gather information is scheduled for February 12, 2002 at 1 :30-3:30 p.m. and will be held in the BOCC Commission Chambers. Attachments included are the Public Workshops' minutes/summary, Planning Workshop minutes, news articles and a chronological listing of the Community Parks System Master Plan/Lawnwood Recreation Complex Master Plan progress to date. FUNDS AVAILABLE IN: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATiON: N/A COMMISSION ACTION: CE: Anderson nty Administrator {í:] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Coordination/Siqnatures County Attorney: Originating Dept: Þ Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.: Other: Other: H:\Agenda Parks referendum.wpd ;;. ~ . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ..." PARKS & RECREATION MEMORANDUM January 22, 2002 BOCC Meeting To: From: Through: Date: Subject: Board of County Commissioners Linda Brown, Administrative Manager ø Pete Keogh, Director January 22, 2002 Community Parks System Master Plan Update The following is a chronological listing of the Community Parks System Master Plan/Lawnwood Recreation Com lex Master Plan progress to date: August 8, 2001- Proposed "Community Parks System Master Plan" presentation by staff to the SLC Property & Homeowners Association August 14, 2001- Proposed "Community Parks System Master Plan" presentation by staff to the Cultural Affairs Council September 18, 2001 - Contracts with Glatting Jackson approved. September 18, 2001- Steering Committee invitations mailed. October 9, 2001- Executed copies of Glatting Jackson contracts received from County Attorneys office. October 9, 2001- Work Authorization forwarded to Glatting Jackson. October 12, 2001- Request to Community Development/GIS to prepare a Base Map as outlined in Part I Existing Conditions Analysis 2.4 (Please see attachmellt). 1 JOHN D. OI<UHN D,stnct No.1' DOUG COWAI<D. DisHier No.2' PAULA A LEWIS Dostner No, J . mANNIE HUTCHINSON DI5rwr No 4 . CUFF OARNES Dosrrrcr No.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderso'1 2JOOVirginiaAvenue · Phone(561)462-1515 · TDD (561) 462-1428 ~ -- "-' '-' October 23, 2001- "Steering Committee" ratification request (Agenda # C-4). October 24, 2001- Kick Off Meeting scheduled with Glatting Jackson & staff (Staff has completed or is in the process of completing Part I Existing Conditions Analysis 2.3 -Review of Existing Documents/Client Responsibilities) (Please see attached status update) Kick Off Meetine with staff and Glattine Jackson was held to discuss plan. Information requested by Glatting Jackson was provided (Status Meeting Minutes Attached). November 2, 2001- A follow-up conference call was held with David Kutner and Victoria Zinser Johnson, project managers representing Glatting Jackson and staff to begin finalizing the Community Parks System Master Plan Schedule. November 5, 2001- Staff provided Glatting Jackson with the attached finalized schedule. (Updated schedule attached indicating the two additional Commission Workshop dates). November 9, 2001- Site visits to St. Lucie County's park and recreation areas were completed by staff and Glatting Jackson. November 28, 20Ot-First "Steering Committee" meeting held. Meeting facilitated by David Kutner from Glatting Jackson. (Meeting Minutes & Hand- Outs Attached) December 10, 2001- A Lawnwood Recreation Complex Programming Workshop, facilitated by David Kutner from Glatting Jackson, was held. Representatives from various sports groups and organizations were invited to participate. (Meeting Minutes Attached) 2 '" "'-" 'wtIÎ cc: Doug Anderson, County Administrator Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Millie Delgado, Recording Secretary Chron File 3 .' ~ COMMUNITY PARKS SYSTEM PUBLIC WORKSHOPS MINUTES/SU~Y The Parks and Recreation Department in conjunction with Glatting Jackson held five (5) Public Workshops througho~t the.C~unty. They were held at the following locations on the following dates. Also held dunng thls ttme was a Staff Workshop on January 9th, in the St. Lucie County Community Development Conference from 1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Also attached under separate cover are the Priority Needs and Future Needs that were identified by the public during the workshops. Januarv 8th, 2002 1) 2) Location Fort Pierce Library (Downtown) SLC Board of County Commission Chambers - Time 5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Januarv 9th, 2002 3) 4) Location White City Home Improvement Club Momingside Library Time 5:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Januarv 10th. 2002 5) Location Lakewood Park Library Time 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Mr. Kutner introduced the team from Glatting Jackson and welcomed everyone to the meetings and gave a brief overview of what would be covered during the meeting. Mr. Kutner began his PowerPoint presentation and explained the steps needed to complete the Community Parks System Master Plan. I. The Plannin2: Process: Mr. Kutner stated that the Planning process is divided into four elements that constitute the plan: 1) Existing Conditions -(Site visits of current parks and their environment) 2) Needs Assessment (Top Priority and Future Needs for the Park) 3) Future System (What the Plan is what the Park system will be when it is developed) 4) Implementation and Action Plan (Completing the Plan, for example, what the priorities for funding assuming that the plan identifies billions of dollars worth of parks development and improvements that might be necessary. How you establish your priorities, what your options are for the developing the funding to actually build the various parks and facilities that you identify as needed, and then who the likely partnerships are through organizations and entities to work together to develop this system as the County can't do it on their own. There are municipalities and there are private recreation providers out there and what is that consolation of partnerships and opportunities that can be taken advantage of to really complete this whole system throughout the County. 1 """ .-J Mr. Kutner explained that the process itself would occur over an eight-month period. In November and December, we have been conducting the existing condition analysis, doing site visits and beginning the needs and priority assessments. The first Steering Committee Workshop was held on November 28th and a series of Public Workshops are being held throughout the month of January. They will then be tempered with a random telephone survey that Glatting Jackson will be conducting by contacting a cross-section of the homeowners throughout the community to be able to provide additional information for identifying what is necessary in developing the parks systems. From that information we will fall into the Preliminary Community Park System Plan with the implementation strategy and by June we anticipate presenting the Final Community Park System Master Plan to the Commission for adoption. Mr. Kutner explained that in order to undertake the needs assessment to identify what new parks, what additional facilities or what existing facilities are out there that need improvement, Glatting and Jackson engage in two (2) separate processes, a) Qualitative Analysis and b) Quantitative Analysis. 1) Qualitative Analvsis: Is going out and talking to people, conducting interviews with the Commissioners and staff, conducting site visits, holding Public Workshops and conducting a telephone analysis. 2) Quantitative Analvsis: Is doing the numbers. Comparing the system that wants to exist in St. Lucie County to National and State standards and looking at your demographics and doing an analysis of drive times from existing parks to ensure that County is well covered by facilities throughout it's geographic area. 3) Consensus Model: Mr. Kutner also explained that Glatting and Jackson also engage in a process of funneling the information to the public, county staff, and the steering committee. Mr. Kutner showed a slide of a Consensus Model that they developed that explains the process that they engage in by taking information from the county staff out to the commission through the residents and steering committee as an iterative process going several cycles of refinement of the information until they are actually able to feel confident that they have identified what those needs are and what the plan is that responds to those needs. David reiterated that the product of that process will be a plan that encompasses an executive summary and a display poster that will become a working document that people can continue to use to market what the plan is over time and to explain to people clearly through a poster what that system wants to be. Mr. Kutner then showed an illustration of what the poster would look like. David also mentioned that they also have a Summary of the Needs Assessment and the Existing Conditions Analysis that they conducted, and will also provide a Conceptual Parks System Map and a narrative of the map, and finally the cost and funding schedule, as well as, the implementation program and those are all the elements of the park. Implementation and Action: Mr. Kutner mentioned that this is the most important part of the plan as far as Glatting Jackson is concerned is the actually implementation plan, which not only identifies who is going to be responsible for undertaking the various actions involved in the process, but also when they will undertake it and what it will cost to undertake the various strategies that are 2 \..i identified and where the funding will come fÌ'om in order to undertake th~ different elements. David pointed through the model illustration how the cross-section of how the implementation and connection will look. David mentioned that Glatting Jackson firmly believes that Implementation is the "core" of the plan. Park System - Elements of and Ideal Park System David showed a model of what we believe is the Ideal Park System and is made up of a host of interlocking elements. Starting with where the residents in the community live and funnels out to regional parks, conservation lands, community parks, neighborhood parks, special use facilities and all these elements are linked by a system of sidewalks, bikeways, trails, streets and greenways that really form this interlocking system that creates an overall Park Plan. Our scope for this project is to focus on the Community and Regional Park what we believe in order to context for the plan you need to look at all of those elements. David showed various slides that indicated what the elements might look like. Such as; a) Urban Spaces - such as River Walk Park, that is inviting for people and is easy to walk to and compliment the commercial activities of the current urban spaces. b) Neighborhood and School Parks - which are small parks that are accessible within a 10- minute walk or Yz mile of every resident of the community. c) Community Parks and Centers - which is going to one of the main elements and focus of this plan. According to state standards the community park would be located within 3- miles of every resident in the community. The County standards are that a community park would be accessible within 10-miles of every resident. A Community Park would also be defined as a park 40 -50% of the land left undeveloped for variety of activities/multi-purpose activities, open space and just grass and trees to enjoy as green spaces. The park itself would be somewhere in the neighborhood of30-50 acres according to both NRPA (National Standards) and County Standards. Example of that is White City Park. d) District Parks - Would be much larger than that. According to the County standards a district park would be defined as a 60-mile surface area and is a park of about 100 acres in size as contrasted to the National standards, which says a district park is 50 -75 acres. David pointed out that this is a larger scale park but have similar uses to a community park. An example of that is Lawnwood, which is about 100 acres in size and has a variety of fields and opportunities for open spaces as well. e) Natural Passive Areas - exemplified in the White City Park area such as nature trails, walkways, etc. f) Linkages - All of these facilities would be interlinked with sidewalks, bikeways and trails and we would also have complimenting those special use facilities such as sports complexes, golf courses, skate parks such as Lawnwood and South County Regional Stadium. g) Waterway and Beach Accesses - such as White City Park and Fort Pierce Marina. 3 David noted that the~epresent all the elements of an optimal park system. Again,~ are concentrating primarily in our scope of services on developing community parks and district parks. Existinl! Condition Analvsis David spoke about the existing condition analysis, which they undertook in order to detennine the base for projecting what our needs are going to be. They started looking at the population trends and St. Lucie County like every other county in South Florida is growing at a tremendously rapid pace. Between 1980 and 2000 the population has doubled (90,000 people to almost 200,000 people) and that rate of growth is projected to continue into the year 2020 for the population to expand by additional 100,000 people. David noted that the Master Plan is suppose to be looking 20-30 years into the future to accommodate that population trend. David pointed out that the age distribution interestingly is not dissimilar to the state. However, we have a far greater number of people in the age segments of 60-84 years of age. The senior citizen population is slightly larger than the state average, (26% vs. 20%). The county also has a fairly large and growing Hispanic population that nearly tripled in 2000. Other than that St. Lucie County is pretty consistent with the state. The next step that Glatting Jackson took was to take a look at the existing conditions are for the facilities that the county currently has. They started looking at a series of documents that have already been created for the county, such as: I) Comprehensive Plan 2) Land Development Regulations 3) Existing Population Demographics 4) Area Maps 5) Various Departmental Budgets - investment in the park system 6) Sports League infonnation 7) Inventory of Municipal Parks Glatting Jackson also conducted a number of site visits. The conclusions of those visits are: I) Some of the facilities are suffering from esthetic and structural improvements are needed. 2) Room for esthetic and functional improvements that could expand the utility of the existing facilities. Some of them could have park furniture replaced in the number of locations and enhance maintenance. 3) Comprehensive Sign System - could be used to better integrate the parks into what the community is and help people understand where the parks are located throughout the county. A coordinated sign system could begin to tie the facilities together so that it is perceived as an integrated system. At this time Victoria Zinser-Johnson from Glatting and Jackson distributed a survey to the group. David explained that this survey would provide Glatting Jackson with infonnation on the publics' short tenn and long-tenn priorities and what that they believe are necessary in developing the system. He explained the various sections of the survey. David mentioned that in Question 2, The Needs Assessment Survey, he would like the group to review the list and rank them and tell us what you feel is the most highest priority needs for various elements. The group was given 5-10 minutes to complete the survey. (Results of each workshop are attached by each 4 \..t.. .. location). Victoria encouraged the group to add as many comments as they felt nece~y on the survey. After discussion of the Priority and Future needs from the group, Victoria reviewed the conclusions that we arrived at conducting our needs assessment. Victoria spoke about the two types of data that they are looking at, Qualitative data they are getting from people and the Quantitative data. Victoria mentioned that during her presentation, she would be focusing mainly on the Quantitative data for number crunching. It doesn't mean that we are going to "hang our hat" on the data, but it is a good benchmark when you are looking at the public information as well as looking at state and national standards. Victoria pointed out that one of the items they looked at during their evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan is that historically the County has focused on water-oriented opportunities and ball fields, but there is a goal to diversify and serve a greater population of the county residents in recreational opportunities and facilities. Victoria also mentioned that in June, Glatting Jackson spoke with the County Commissioners and the objective of the project was to determine how local governments were going to work together to create a parks system that would benefit the entire county and to maximize the partnership, as well as, determining how funding was going to happen and the Commission estimated that it would cost approximately $50-60 million for the new parks and that there would be a focus on active sports and recreation with linkages which could be comprised of sidewalks, bikeways, etc. and that creating a plan for Lawnwood Park was a high priority. Victoria stated that the Lawnwood Plan is going on concurrently with this project. The plans developed for Lawnwood Park would serve as a proto-type for other projects of the Master Park Plan. Victoria mentioned that the Steering Committee consists of numerous representatives of different interests and met in November. She provided the results of the survey taken at the meeting. The results are as follows: Priority Needs: Future Needs: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Soccer Fields Soft ball Fields Large Community Parks Special Use Facilities Aquatic Park Transit 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Health/Wellness Programs Skate Park Roller Hockey Rink Social Services Volley Ball Courts Amphitheatre Victoria then reviewed the state and national standards. She confirmed that the State-wide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCaRP) and the National Recreation and Parks Association Standards set the state standards. She mentioned that when you look at the entire County, using both the incorporated and unincorporated areas, the standard is 2 acres of community parks per 1000 residents. When compared to the County's current facilities, there is a deficit today in acreage and the deficit will continue over the next several years. Victoria also mentioned that the same information in the unincorporated population only, shows a small surplus presently, but as you move out toward the year 2020 there is a deficiency. She also explained to the group that the County is using a stricter standard than the state and national standards and that is 5 acres per 1000 residents, and if you use that stricter standards, it does show that even with the unincorporated county population there is a deficiency presently which continues out to the future as well. Victoria illustrated other examples of deficiencies based 5 .f¡ . fì~ ~ upon III onnatIon rom state and national standards for the county facilities V'r." programs available both incorporated and unincorporated areas throughout the county. In summary, the northern, and western areas of the county are well served due to the travel radius to the parks. According to state standards, there is a deficiency in community park acreage as well as a deficiency in most recreation facilities. And, it does look as though the partnerships with the different service providers such as municipalities; private providers and schools are under-utilized. David Kutner explained that they expect to complete the public participation process throughout the county this month and then begin to develop the actual conceptual plan vision based on the infonnation we receive. Next month they will be conducting a telephone survey that will further supplement the data that they have and then in April, they will have completed a conceptual plan and the first stab at an implementation program. Through March and April we will be completing a preliminary community parks plan and implementation strategy. Throughout May and into June we will be working a final document of that plan. David also mentioned that during this process of developing the conceptual analysis, we will also be completing a conceptual plan for Lawnwood, which as we said during the presentation will serve as a proto- type and give people a clear vision of what an actual park system may look like if developed according to the infonnation we received in the needs analysis and what we are hearing from all the people in our public process. 6 ~ --' January 8th, 2002 - Tuesday Fort Pierce Library Melody Lane, Fort Pierce Florida 5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Attendees: Glatting Jackson Staff, Parks and Recreation Staff, and members of the public Priorities Needs: I) Tie parks and trails into the library system 2) Par courses 3) Map ofparks/better public information 4) Improved maintenance (painting over graffiti, trimming trees, picking up litter) 5) Bike trails 6) Trails Map 7) Softball Fields (10 fields in 2 wheels of 5 each) Future Needs: None Other Comments: 1) Concern with SCORP standards grouping baseball and softball together 2) Concern with the inclusion of school facilities within the needs assessment inventory since these facilities are not open to the public. 7 \..I .J January 81\ 2002 - Tuesday Board of County Commission Chambers Roger Poitras Building 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce Florida 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Attendees: Glatting Jackson Staff, Parks and Recreation Staff, Commissioner Hutchinson and members of the public, Priority Needs: I) Adult Softball facilities (2 "votes) 2) Maintenance/improvement to ball fields (a lot of efforts currently done by volunteers) 3) Amphitheatre/Special event area 4) Soccer Fields Future Needs: None Other Comments: 1) Holiday/celebrations and special events planned to be accommodated in the future at the new fairgrounds site. 8 \w January 9th, 2002 - Wednesday White City Park Home Improvement Club Fort Pierce Florida 5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. ....J Attendees: Glatting Jackson Staff, Parks and Recreation Staff, Commissioner Hutchinson and members of the public. Prioritv Needs: 1) Maintenance at current neighborhood parks 2) Natural Areas 3) Aquatic Center 4) Sidewalks 5) All types of programs 6) Small Community Center/meeting space 7) River Park Marina and numerous other facilities need restrooms 8) Regional/District Parks in Mid-County 9) Softball Fields 10) Nature Trails (and trail maintenance) 11) Boat Ramps 12) Better promotion/publicizing information of park activities/meeting 13) Ice Hockey Rink 14) Football Fields 15) Soccer Fields 16) Playgrounds 17) Beach Parking 18) Picnic Areas 19) Fishing Piers Future Needs: I) More access to waterways 2) Dog Parks 3) Community Centers Other Comments: 1) Include Ancient Oaks property within planning efforts 2) Concem with the high cost of park furniture 3) Savannas will have future meeting place 4) Department should look at, and formalize "park adoption" process for neighborhood groups 5) Tie Fairgrounds plan into the Master Plan 6) Children Play on vacant lots now, as these become developed more opportunities will be limited. 9 \...; January 9t\ 2002 - Tuesday Morningside Library 2410 SE Morningside Boulevard Port St. Lucie, FL 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. ..J Attendees: Glatting Jackson Staff, Parks and Recreation Staff and members of the public. Priority Needs: 1) Community Park 2) Special Use Facilities 3) Sidewalks 4) Bike Lanes 5) Recreation Programs 6) Education Programs 7) Picnic Areas 8) Beach Parking 9) Community Center 10) Ice Hockey Rink 11) Football Fields 12) Soccer Fields Future Needs: 1) Neighborhood Parks 2) Community Parks 3) Bike Lanes 4) Tennis Courts 5) Recreation Programs 6) Special Event Area 7) Amphitheatre 8) Dog Park 9) Education Programs 10) Aquatics Center Other Comments: 1) School board should open gymnasiums up to public after hours. 10 '-' January 101\ 2002 - Wednesday Lakewood Park Library 7605 Santa Barbara Drive Fort Pierce, FL 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. ...J Attendees: Glatting Jackson Staff, Parks and Recreation Staff, Commissioner Barnes and members of the public. Priority Needs: 1) Multi-purpose open spaces or fields in the immediate future-facilities do not have to be complex, the need is very great now. 2) Community Park in the northern area of the County 3) Sidewalks 4) Multi-purpose Paths 5) Maintenance (i.e. fire ant control) 6) Recreation Programs Facilitators for youth and teen sport leagues More activities for teens 7) Roller Hockey Rink 8) Soccer Fields 9) Gymnasium 10) Aquatic Center/Pool II) Frisbee Golf Course 12) Better promotion of events and meetings 13) Message Center at Lakewood Park 14) Flag pole at Lakewood Park 15) Partnering with School Board to utilize properties 11 COMMUNITY},(RKS SYSTEM MASTER PLAN STAFF WORKSHOP~UTES SLC Community Development Conference Room Wednesday, January 9th, 2002 1 :30 p.m. to 3 :05 p.m Attendees: Judy Mattera, Community Services, Rick Selner, Recreation, Bryce Archer, Recreation, Eric Jackson, Recreation, Willie Redden, Recreation, Patti Raffensberger, Recreation, Jodi Bonet, Grants, Bill Hoeffues, Administration, Gary Perdew, OMB, Sonya Smith, Administration, Dennis Murphy, Community Development, Iva Jean Maddox, Historical Museum, Summer Ivey, Savannas, Glatting Jackson Staff and Parks and Recreation Staff. Mr. Kutner introduced the team from Glatting Jackson and welcomed everyone to the meetings and gave a brief overview of what would be covered during the meeting. Mr. Kutner began his PowerPoint presentation and explained the steps needed to complete the Community Parks System Master Plan. I. The Plannio2: Process: Mr. Kutner stated that the Planning process is divided into four elements that constitute the plan: I) Existing Conditions -(Site visits of current parks and their environment) 2) Needs Assessment (Top Priority and Future Needs for the Park) 3) Future System (What the Plan is what the Park system will be when it is developed) 4) Implementation and Action Plan (Completing the Plan, for example, what the priorities for funding assuming that the plan identifies billions of dollars worth of parks development and improvements that might be necessary. How you establish your priorities, what your options are for the developing the funding to actually build the various parks and facilities that you identify as needed, and then who the likely partnerships are through organizations and entities to work together to develop this system as the County can't do it on their own. There are municipalities and there are private recreation providers out there and what is that consolation of partnerships and opportunities that can be taken advantage of to really complete this whole system throughout the County. Mr. Kutner explained that the process itself would occur over an eight-month period. In November and December, we have been conducting the existing condition analysis, doing site visits and beginning the needs and priority assessments. The first Steering Committee Workshop was held on November 28th and a series of Public Workshops are being held throughout the month of January. They will then be tempered with a random telephone survey that Glatting Jackson will be conducting by contacting a cross-section of the homeowners throughout the community to be able to provide additional information for identifying what is necessary in developing the parks systems. From that information we will fall into the Preliminary Community Park System Plan with the implementation strategy and by June we anticipate presenting the Final Community Park System Master Plan to the Commission for adoption. Mr. Kutner explained that in order to undertake the needs assessment to identify what new parks, what additional facilities or what existing facilities are out there that need improvement, Glatting I and Jackson engag~ two (2) separate processes, a) Qualitative Analysis and b~uantitative Analysis. I) Qualitative Analvsis: Is going out and talking to people, conducting interviews with the Commissioners and staff, conducting site visits, holding Public Workshops and conducting a telephone analysis. 2) Quantitative Analysis: Is doing the numbers. Comparing the system that wants to exist in S1. Lucie County to National and State standards and looking at your demographics and doing an analysis of drive times from existing parks to ensure that County is well covered by facilities throughout it's geographic area. 3) Consensus Model: Mr. Kutner also explained that Glatting and Jackson also engage in a process of funneling the infonnation to the public, county staff, and the steering committee. Mr. Kutner showed a slide of a Consensus Model that they developed that explains the process that they engage in by taking infonnation from the county staff out to the commission through the residents and steering committee as an iterative process going several cycles of refinement of the infonnation until they are actually able to feel confident that they have identified what those needs are and what the plan is that responds to those needs, David reiterated that the product of that process will be a plan that encompasses an executive summary and a display poster that will become a working document that people can continue to use to market what the plan is over time and to explain to people clearly through a poster what that system wants to be. Mr. Kutner then showed an illustration of what the poster would look like. David also mentioned that they also have a Summary of the Needs Assessment and the Existing Conditions Analysis that they conducted, and will also provide a Conceptual Parks System Map and a narrative of the map, and finally the cost and funding schedule, as well as, the implementation program and those are all the elements of the park. Implementation and Action: Mr. Kutner mentioned that this is the most important part of the plan as far as Glatting Jackson is concerned is the actually implementation plan, which not only identifies who is going to be responsible for undertaking the various actions involved in the process, but also when they will undertake it and what it will cost to undertake the various strategies that are identified and where the funding will come from in order to undertake those different elements. David pointed through the model illustration how the cross-section of how the implementation and connection will look. David mentioned that Glatting Jackson finnly believes that Implementation is the "core" of the plan. Park System - Elements of and Ideal Park System David showed a model of what we believe is the Ideal Park System and is made up of a host of interlocking elements. Starting with where the residents in the community live and funnels out to regional parks, conservation lands, community parks, neighborhood parks, special use facilities and all these elements are linked by a system of sidewalks, bikeways, trails, streets and greenways that really fonn this interlocking system that creates an overall Park Plan. Our scope for this project is to focus on the Community and Regional Park what we believe in order to context for the plan you need to look at all of those elements. David showed various slides that indicated what the elements might look like. Such as; 2 '-' ....,¡ a) Urban Spaces - such as River Walk Park, that is inviting for people and is easy to walk to and compliment the commercial activities of the current urban spaces. b) Neighborhood and School Parks - which are small parks that are accessible within a 10- minute walk or Y2 mile of every resident of the community. c) Community Parks and Centers - which is going to one of the main elements and focus of this plan. According to state standards the community park would be located within 3- miles of every resident in the community. The County standards are that a community park would be accessible within 10-miles of every resident. A Community Park would also be defined as a park 40 -50% of the land left undeveloped for variety of activities/multi-purpose activities, open space and just grass and trees to enjoy as green spaces. The park itself would be somewhere in the neighborhood of 30-50 acres according to both NRPA (National Standards) and County Standards. Example of that is White City Park. d) District Parks - Would be much larger than that. According to the County standards a district park would be defined as a 60-mile surface area and is a park of about 100 acres in size as contrasted to the National standards, which says a district park is 50 -75 acres. David pointed out that this is a larger scale park but have similar uses to a community park. An example of that is Lawnwood, which is about 100 acres in size and has a variety of fields and opportunities for open spaces as well. e) Natural Passive Areas - exemplified in the White City Park area such as nature trails, walkways, etc. f) Linkages - All of these facilities would be interlinked with sidewalks, bikeways and trails and we would also have complimenting those special use facilities such as sports complexes, golf courses, skate parks such as Lawnwood and South County Regional Stadium. g) Waterway and Beach Accesses - such as White City Park and Fort Pierce Marina. David noted that these represent all the elements of an optimal park system. Again, we are concentrating primarily in our scope of services on developing community parks and district parks. Existinl! Condition Analvsis David spoke about the existing condition analysis, which they undertook in order to determine the base for projecting what our needs are going to be. They started looking at the population trends and St. Lucie County like every other county in South Florida is growing at a tremendously rapid pace. Between 1980 and 2000 the population has doubled (90,000 people to almost 200,000 people) and that rate of growth is projected to continue into the year 2020 for the population to expand by additional 100,000 people. David noted that the Master Plan is suppose to be looking 20-30 years into the future to accommodate that population trend. David pointed out that the age distribution interestingly is not dissimilar to the state. However, we have a far greater number of people in the age segments of 60-84 years of age. The senior citizen population is slightly larger than the state average, (26% vs. 20%). The county also has a 3 fairly large and gro~ Hispanic population that nearly tripled in 2000. Other than,,",t St. Lucie County is pretty consistent with the state. The next step that GIatting Jackson took was to take a look at the existing conditions are for the facilities that the county currently has. They started looking at a series of documents that have already been created for the county, such as: 1) Comprehensive Plan 2) Land Development Regulations 3) Existing Population Demographics 4) Area Maps 5) Various Departmental Budgets - investment in the park system 6) Sports League information 7) Inventory of Municipal Parks GIatting Jackson also conducted a number of site visits. The conclusions ofthose visits are: 1) Some of the facilities are suffering [rom esthetic and structural improvements are needed. 2) Room for esthetic and functional improvements that could expand the utility ofthe existing facilities. Some of them could have park furniture replaced in the number of locations and enhance maintenance. 3) Comprehensive Sign System - could be used to better integrate the parks into what the community is and help people understand where the parks are located throughout the county. A coordinated sign system could begin to tie the facilities together so that it is perceived as an integrated system. At this time Victoria Zinser-Johnson from GIatting and Jackson distributed a survey to the group. David explained that this survey would provide GIatting Jackson with information on the publics' short term and long-term priorities and what that they believe are necessary in developing the system. He explained the various sections of the survey. David mentioned that in Question 2, The Needs Assessment Survey, he would like the group to review the list and rank them and tell us what you feel is the most highest priority needs for various elements. The group was given 5-10 minutes to complete the survey. (Results of each workshop are attached by each location). Victoria encouraged the group to add as many comments as they felt necessary on the survey. After discussion of the Priority and Future needs from the group, Victoria reviewed the conclusions that we arrived at conducting our needs assessment. Victoria spoke about the two types of data that they are looking at, Qualitative data they are getting from people and the Quantitative data. Victoria mentioned that during her presentation, she would be focusing mainly on the Quantitative data for number crunching. It doesn't mean that we are going to "hang our hat" on the data, but it is a good benchmark when you are looking at the public information as well as looking at state and national standards. Victoria pointed out that one of the items they looked at during their evaluation ofthe Comprehensive Plan is that historically the County has focused on water-oriented opportunities and ball fields, but there is a goal to diversify and serve a greater population of the county residents in recreational opportunities and facilities. Victoria also mentioned that in June, GIatting Jackson spoke with the County Commissioners and the objective ofthe project was to determine how local governments were going to work together to create a parks system that would benefit the entire county and to maximize the 4 partnership, as well ~detennining how funding was going to happen and the Co~sion estimated that it would cost approximately $50-60 million for the new parks and that there would be a focus on active sports and recreation with linkages which could be comprised of sidewalks bikeways, etc. and that creating a plan for Lawnwood Park was a high priority. Victoria stated' that the Lawnwood Plan is going on concurrently with this project. The plans developed for Lawnwood Park would serve as a proto-type for other projects of the Master Park Plan. Victoria mentioned that the Steering Committee consists of numerous representatives of different interests and met in November. She provided the results of the survey taken at the meeting. The results are as follows: Priority Needs: Future Needs: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Soccer Fields Soft ball Fields Large Community Parks Special Use Facilities Aquatic Park Transit 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Health/Wellness Programs Skate Park Roller Hockey Rink Social Services Volley Ball Courts Amphitheatre Victoria then reviewed the state and national standards. She confinned that the State-wide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) and the National Recreation and Parks Association Standards set the state standards. She mentioned that when you look at the entire County, using both the incorporated and unincorporated areas, the standard is 2 acres of community parks per 1000 residents. When compared to the County's current facilities, there is a deficit today in acreage and the deficit will continue over the next several years. Victoria also mentioned that the same infonnation in the unincorporated population only, shows a small surplus presently, but as you move out toward the year 2020 there is a deficiency. She also explained to the group that the County is using a stricter standard than the state and national standards and that is 5 acres per 1000 residents, and if you use that stricter standards, it does show that even with the unincorporated county population there is a deficiency presently which continues out to the future as well. Victoria illustrated other examples of deficiencies based upon infonnation from state and national standards for the county facilities vs. programs available both incorporated and unincorporated areas throughout the county. In summary, the northern, and western areas of the county are well served due to the travel radius to the parks. According to state standards, there is a deficiency in community park acreage as well as a deficiency in most recreation facilities. And, it does look as though the partnerships with the different service providers such as municipalities; private providers and schools are under-utilized. David Kutner explained that they expect to complete the public participation process throughout the county this month and then begin to develop the actual conceptual plan vision based on the infonnation we receive. Next month they will be conducting a telephone survey that will further supplement the data that they have and then in April, they will have completed a conceptual plan and the first stab at an implementation program. Through March and April we will be completing a preliminary community parks plan and implementation strategy. Throughout May and into June we will be working a final document of that plan. David also mentioned that during this process of developing the conceptual analysis, we will also be completing a conceptual plan for Lawnwood, which as we said during the presentation will serve as a proto- 5 type and give peop~ clear vision of what an actual park system may look likrl developed according to the infonnation we received in the needs analysis and what we are hearing fÌ"om all the people in our public process. Meeting adjourned at 3:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Elaine M. W oociker 6 '-' wJ St. Lucie County Staff Workshop Community Development Conference Room 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL Prioritv Needs: l) Community Parks 2) (Tie between the following facilities) Bike Lanes Playgrounds 3) (Tie between the following facilities) Multi-purpose Fields Multi-purpose Courts Recreation Programs 4) (Tie between the following facilities) Sidewalks Education Programs Health/Wellness Programs Aquatic Center Future Needs: 1) Transit 2) (Tie between the following facilities) Community Center Beach Parking Amphitheatre Fishing Piers Football Fields Other Comments: l) Concern with listing transit without qualifying what is meant by this, since most will assume this to mean wide-scale mass transit, and this wider level of transit is just beginning in small areas of the County 2) Potential community/district park sites in the northern part of the County will be difficult because ideally they should not be too far north ofIndrio Road and easy accessible by pedestrians. 3) Coordination with the YMCA and/or the Boys and Girls should be investigated (some concern was expressed with the condition of the Fort Pierce YMCA) 7 4) partn\.rng with IRCC (particularly for Aquatics) should be further i~stigated. 5) Partnerships with the School Board have become increasingly difficult. 6) Population growth in St. Lucie County will be mainly focused on west of Port St. Lucie, some in the Lakewood area. 7) It should be made clear that the Master Plan for Lawnwood is an "example" of what could be designed in other areas of the County concern with some residents not understanding the word "proto-type". 8) Given that the bulk of voters are south of Midway Road and east ofI-95, to pass the Bond Referendum, it will be necessary to clearly show these voters how it will benefit them. 9) The City of Port S1. Lucie will have to be a major partner in determining a potential location for a future community/district park in the south county. 8 ..... ¡II '-' ~ FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT .,..¡ FYI Tips on passing a bond referendum By Matt Zieper The author is the national research director for the Trust for Pubirc Land, San Francisco, He spoke on ¡he subject of passing bond referenda at the June 2000 conference of the Gowmment Fmance Officers Association, Chicago. Local officials are confronted wirh capi- ral improvemenr needs - building new schools, repairing aging sewerage trearment plants or expanding the park system - rhat require passa~e of bond ref- erenda. Why do some place4 make it look easy, routinely passing referenda for mil- lions of dollars, while others watch bond proposals get defeared? Although there is no magic to winning bond measures, there are a number of do's and don'ts that can gready increase the likelihood of success. Do start early. Governments should launch bond campaigns at least a year before the vote. They need time to build well-rounded coalitions, gather informa- rion, poll residents, get ballot questions before vorers and communicate with the public. Do build a wide-ranging coalition of support. Winning coalitions call on local leaders, including the business community, nonprofits and neighborhood groups, Rep- resenratives of rhose groups can enhance the government's public communication, provide insight into polling and assisr in fundraising, Do hit the law books. Organizers should know the exacr bailor language re- quiremenrs, rhe necessary steps fur gerring on rhe ballot and rhe process for obtaining approval of a bailor question. Finally, rhe bond should not exceed the limit on the rota I level of bonding in the ciry/county. Do rake a history lesson. To understand how porential bond measures may fare, ir is compel1ll1g hy resting legally permissible sample ballot questions. Don't ignore what voters say they want. In some cases, the interests that res- onate most srrongly with voters diverge from those of the initiators of the bond measure. Wll1ning measures correspond to voters' highest priorities. Don't ask for too much money. It is al- ways berter to win a $10 million bond than to lose a $20 million bond. If rhe polls do not support a big bond, it should not be placed on the bailor. Don't bank on a good campaign saving a bad measure. Running a winning cam- paign is laborious and expensive, consider- ing media buys, printing and grass roots or- ganizing, Campaigns cannot make up for poorly conceivcd measures that ignore resi- dents' interests or ask for too much money. The Safe Neighborhoods Park Act in Dade County (Miami), Fla., illustrates a successful bond measure, In November 1996, 67 percent of Dade COUnty voters approved the $200 million bond for parks and recreation - remarkable in a county where voters had previously rejected sever- al high-profile bond measures. Nearly two years in rhe making, the acr was the brall1child of a coalition that included local governmem and parks rep- resentatives, ienior citizens, and neighbor- hood and crime-prevemion organizations. Public oplnion polling highlighred two major vorer priorities: reducing crime among juveniles (rhrough recreation) and Winning measures correspond to voters' highest priorities. Ce¡1v . 8~ CfÞÍJi2 {-l-f eo~ r~Jn- O;;v /r1o~ '10 Augusr 2000 imporranr to know how rccem fiscal meas- ures - both bonds and tax increases _ have done at the ballot box, Obtaining clecrion results of statewide bond measures from the secretary of state's office can show how each community voted. Do take polls. Political pollsters can de- termine what projects voters are .interested in; holV much they are willing t3 pay per household; and what messages they find protecrll1g quality of life by preserving nat- ural areas as open space. Voters were more likely to support a measure if it had safeguards to ensure the money was properly spent and if the cost per household remained below $8.50 ($200 million total). Dade County's bond referendum was successful because organiz- ers planned ahead, researched and heeded rhe poll results, -t:r AME1UCAN CITY & COUNl \' 1) - r'§'-1 996 9: 35M,\ '" j <'3 i Æ I\Ì Q' Q .. ~ .. ~ " 0 :¡ i?- 8 .c CI. "- E ",1 \...,.. .,..¡ P.1 2L ' THE HERALD. SU~OA Y, NOVEMBER 17, 1996 f· ~h~ Æiamt 1Jféra!(t JOHN S. KNIGHT (l89.f·l98V ]MŒS L KNIGHT (I90~i99V DAVID L\WRENCEJR.. hblisJf{ralld Chajnrun' JOE N¡\TOU JIM HAMPTON DOUGLAS C. CUflDN Prt.Jidcnt £¡J.¡/Of Euttlth·, Edìial' I MARTIiA MUSGROVE ~.o.(t £¡Juar . lARRY·OLMSTEAD Mana¡i<¡ UiJðr How to p·a.ss a bond vote Election results òf "'" the , . proposed co 1'1 s [ t u II 0 n a I . amendment to impose , a penny-per-pound tax on the sugar industry and tþe question of whether an arena should be built on Miami's waterfront ovcrshadowed the approval o.f two loç¡l bond issues 'for capital improvements in parks. Their passage where many örhers recently ba vc [ailed deserves a second look. Fort LauderdaJe voters agreed to a S35 miIliol1 upgrading of some parks' and crcatiOri of other, new parks. JUsl months earlier, Hollywood voters had rejected a similar plan. II\. D<lde:, where": thc: onJy recC:tJt bond Question to pass was in 1994 for fire- rescue department improvcments, vot- crs agreed to $200 million in parks capi- . tal iniþrov.cmenls:¥r'hy did these win? . The shOlt answer: preparation and leadership. In,Dade. preparations began more than two yC<1rs ago; The Trost for Public Land's projtX:t director, Brenda Marshall,. recruited residents and civic Jeaders_ Attorney Hank Adorno agreed to lead the campaign. . . MOlley was 'found for a poll to deter- mine what voters wanted and were will- ing to 'pay to get. Interestingl)', among tfadi tionally anti-tax. HispanIc voters, womcn polled were more supportive than men of a parks-bond issue. On Nov. 5 a majority of non-Hispanic whites and blaçks - and half the voting Hispanics - said Yes to the bonds, In Fort Lauderdale, thc Parks Ad vi- sory Board was doing its homework at "" r-..ol. ~~, public meetings to PREPARATION HELPS determine what to . include in a bond So does leadership. issue. When detailed \VithOllt it, two local spending lists were k . made public (anQther par ,s":lffiprovement vitål strategy), each questions might have ref1ected' residents' fii1ëd at the Polls. wishes. . Often the hardest ,. job is findin,& ,political leadership. The Metro CommlssIOD'gen- craHy puts a bond q,uešiion on the baUot but then abandons It. So it was with the 1994 crirninal-j!lStice bond proposa!s to expand courtrooms and Improve decrepit juvenile facilities. Recognizing this, Dade's parks-bonds campaign was deŸeloped ~thout count- ing on commissioners' help. Others, notably Dade State Attorney Katherine Fema.ndez Rundle, did sign on. In Fort Lauderdale, Mayor Jim Naugle took the lead- in putting the parks question On the . Nov. 5 ballot even after Elections Super- visor Jane Carrol! temporarily shelvcd it by saying that there was no ballot space because of outdated equipment. (Contrast that with Dade's appoìnted. elcctions supervisor, David Leahy. He quietly accommodated tbe late addition to the ballot of 96 newly created Com- munity Council Seals that drew 283 can- didates aU told.)· . To be sure Improved parks may be easier to sell than criminal-justice facili- ties, no matter how skilled the advance work. Yet period,iè improvements to a community's public spaces, jails and 'courthouses included, can· improve how public business is conductro. Somehow tbat messagc aJso must be made con- vincing to skcptical voters. . ,. .J ~ ~JI'''''''''''... "'DoI:_'IoI'Lr-.n..~I.."'..7"'~TY".:.a..,JIWŠi.- ~~.LÆ""L......... ....~P'j¡y;-..i.o:>~ 1-"":'''' ___~":: ,.~_~ Passing a Successful Bond Measure Using the Benefits Approach Presented by: W. Howard Gregg, Chief Amy Paige Woll,. Planner Planning and Research Division Metro-Dade Park and Recreation Department Benefits Institute December 4, 1997 Kissimee, Florida , ..~.., .', ,"'. ..,.".-.,-" ".., ,. ,',_ .,...., ,__'.." - : _u.. ',_~".... ,"' ,', ,', .......,. -.··c,'<-."..·..··.,.,,",. _;::,~;~,..': :."'" :.-..(~}:J>-\.,'~:~}:,:\ " .... '···1':: :;;-i ' . ,"'<':_",_"":__'::' _u.c ,.""'.,.,_, .. ..w..... ","_:... . J." ("~ '.. '; _.,: "''',',', ,;~:F'::-,,"¡ ¡ '.~ .] :¡ ì j 1 What Does it Take to Pass a Bond Measure? · Political Support to Get on the Ballot · Broad Public Support to Win at the Polls 2 ~: .¡;I What is the Benefits Message? · There is a NEED · You Will BENEFIT · There Win be SAFEGUARDS to Ensure Accountability 3 .:d . "c . <1'~:-~ ~ I' ".':'" ? ,,,,. .~ Who is the Audience? Support Organizations Business, Civic Organizations Voting Public State Government Political Leaders County Administrators Local Government 4 ,~: Who are the Messengers? · Credible · Legitimate · Non-Political · Non-Controversial 5 How Do You Deliver the Message? · Forums · Communication Tools 6 'ia' -·:';:::~r[::;",'~J..~:j· .;:::';; ~~~I'~' '. Homework · History of Local Fiscal Measures · For what? · How much? · Reasons for success or failure? · Study Successful Measures From Around State/Country · Common themes ~.,. . ~, ;! ~ í ¡ -§ Homework · Economic Health of County/Municipality -Indebtedness · Property tax rate · Housing starts/prices - Socioeconomic factors 8 ~" II ~II-__ Homework · Voter Demographics and Public Opinion · Who votes? · Profile of potential support · Determine best election time · How do you stack up against other issues? 9 :J: ~ : History of Fiscal Ballot Measures: Dade County, Florida, 1988 1996 Safe Neighborhood Parks Act (1996) Educational Opportunities, FlU (1994) Fire & Rescue Service Bonds (1994) Police Facilities Bonds (1994) Justice System Bonds (1994) Crime Prevention/Public Safety (1994) Miami-Dade Community College (1992) Infrastructure/Transportation Surtax (1991) Health (are Improvement Surtax (1990) Transit System Surtax (1990) Environmental Preservation (1990) Juvenile Welfare Special District (1988) Public Library System (1988) 50% T 10 20 30 40 Percentage % 50 60 70 10 .;1: Common Themes · Adual Need Detennined · Suffiåent Time (9-24 months) Devoted to Researchf Planning, Organizing, Coordinating and Implementing Strategy · Grassroots Initiative with Citizensf Input and Oversight · Campaign Used to Infonn and Build Support 11 · 1990/91 Public Opinion Polling · Stand Alone · Consider General Election · Higher voter turnout · Favorable demographics 12 1990/91 Public Opinion Polling · Weak When Competing Against Other Issues · County hospital · Public library · Mass transit · Strong Support for Reaeation Faålities and Opportunities with Broad Appeal that Benefit the Public Good · Beaches · Natural areas 13 P-l. ·I·~¡' · Need s 1.1 Billion 14 ~: July 1995 Public Opinion Poll: Voters' Concerns Crime Drugs/Drug Abuse Youth Violence Government Mismanagement Development of Natural Areas Uncontrolled Growth High Property Taxes 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Percentage % 15 'I ~j: July 1995 Public Opinion Poll: Voters' Priorities Positive Recreation Alternatives for Kids Leaving a Legacy Create Jobs Increase Livability of Neighborhoods Improve Quality of Life Protect /Restore Sensitive Natural Areas Make Parks Safer for Children 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Percentage % 16 J: July 1995 Public Opinion Poll: Wilhngness to Pay $ 7.00 $14.°0 $ Annually / Household $20.°0 $25.°0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percentage % . $7.00 $ 1 0.00 Annually · $200 Million T 0101 17 'I d: ~ ~ ~ ! J , ~ i ~ ~ .~ . March 1996 Public Opinion Poll · Confirmed Willingness to Pay · Identified Credible Messengers · Targeted Election Date 1 B ~: March 1996 Public Opinion Poll Identified: Solid Support (' ~\ - Registered Democrats - Renters -18-39YearsOld 19 J: :~ ;1 ¡ ¡ .~ 1 ¡ 1 I .~ March 1996 Public Opinion Poll Identified: Soft Support /' ". · Women · Jews 20 ~: March 1996 Public Opinion Poll Identified: Swing Voters ~~ 8 African Americans · Cuoons Over SS 21 " d: · March 1996 Public Opinion Poll · Developed Measure's Name · Emphasized Need for Strong Information Campaign · Highlighted Potential Messengers · Emphasized Public's Distrust of Government · Requiring an annual independent audit ranked higher than "protecting God's creations." 22 ,~: The Benefit Messages · There is a Need -Over $) bt1lion in capital improvement needs Countywide -This measure only tackles 18 percent 23 .J: · The Benefit Messages · Benefits · Safe places for families and children · Juvenile crime prevention tool · Improved quality of life · Natural resource protection · Fairness · limited investment for maior fundraising 24 'I:J: · . Passing a Successful Bond Measure The Benefit Messages · Safeguards · No lottery · No blank check -No white elephants · No bait and switch · Maintenance of effort · Citizens oversight -Independent audits 25 ~: The Messengers: Must Relate to the Audience · Park User/Supporter · Civic/Business leaders · Administrators · friends · Lobbyists · Other Politiåans · Campaign Contributors · Law Enforcement · Women · Clergy · Park Professionals · Conservation Organizations 26 .~: t~.·'" ~. .~ ..... ... ~] ~ Forums: Getting the Word Out · One-On-One Meetings · Public Meetings · Association Newsletters · Organizational Meetings · Broadcast Media · Print Media · Phone Bank · Special Events 27 ,~: · Tools · Polling Results · L.A. Example · Ordinance/Resolution · Ballot Language · Q&A Fact Sheet · Ordinance Summary · Proiect Lists · Speakers Bureau · Speakers Q&A · Flyers · Brochures · Position Papers 28 ~ Tools · Park Signs · Press Releases · Phone Bank · Letters to the Editor · Direct Mail · Professional Television Advertisement · Banners · Tee Shirts · Placards · Palm Cards 29 ~. ,_k - The Audience: County Administrators l 1 1- The Messengers: · Park user/supporter · Politician · Civic leaders l ~..} - The Benefit Messages: · Need · Support · Fairness 30 .~: The Audience: County Administrators [YiW] · Forums: · One-on-one [ ~ ] · Tools: · Polling results · L.A. Example · Ordinance/resolution · Ballot language 31 ~:, f J 1 . The Audience: Political Leaders [ 1 ]. The Messengers: · Park user/supporter · Administrators · Other Politicians · Civic/business leaders · Friends ·Campaign contributors 32 ,~: · . Passing a Successful Bond Measure The Audience: Political Leaders [il..~i] . The Benefit Messages: · What's in your district · Need ·Safety · Crime prevention tool ·Quality of life · Fairness · Public support 33 ~: The Audience: Political Leaders till) · Forums: · One-on-one · Public meetings · Editorial pages [ ~ ] · Tools: · Polling results · L.A. Example · Proiect lists · Ordinance/resolution ·Ballotlanguage 34 ,~: The Audience: Local and State Government · The Messengers: · Park user/supporter · Other politians · Civic leaders ·friends · Park Professionals [ ~ ]. The Benefit Messages: · Need · Quality of life · Fairness · Limited investment/high yield 35 J: t The Audience: Local and State Government (IIM)- Forums: · One-on-one · Public meetings [ "' ] - Tools: · Polling results · Ordinance/resolution/ballot language · Q&A fact sheet · Ordinance summary 36 ,~: The Audience: Support Organizations [1 ) · The Messengers: · Park user/supporter · Civic/business leaders · Law enforcement · Women · Park professionals 37 ~. ~' j , 4 ~ ¡ , ¡ j ~ , ~ ~ , . . The Audience: Support Organizations ti,~]} · The Benefit Messages: · Direct /indirect beneficiaries - Children · Protected natural resources - Fairness - No lottery/blank check/white elephant -Independent audit - Citizens oversight · Limited investment/high yield 38 .J: The Audience: Support Organizations [III,]· Forums: ·One-an-one ·Public meetings · Newsletters [ "\ ]. Tools: · Q&A fact sheet · Ordinance summary · Brochure · Project lists · Position papers 39 ~:. .-1, ''1 ¡ 1 "~ 1 ;¡ z , j The Audience: Voting Public l . ~ } · The Messengers: · Park user/supporter · Law enforcement · Women · Clergy 40 ~. .~, The Audience: Voting Public · The Benefit Messages: · Specific projects · There is a need · Children · Improved quality of life · Protected natural resources · Fairness · No lottery/blank check/white elephant · Independent audits · Citizens oversight · Limited investment/high yield 41 ~. ·¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I· · The Audience: Voting Public l~] · Forums: · Public meetings · Newsletters · Brooacast Media · Print Media · Phone bank · Speåal events 42 i: The Audience: Voting Public · Tools: · Q&A fact sheet · Ordinance summary · Flyers · Brochure · Proled list · Position paper · Press releases ·Television · Banners · Park signs · Direct mail · Tee shirts · Placards 43 ·1 9800081 11/97 ",., /'" \w 'wi AGENDA ITEM NO. C-2b DATE: January 22,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Parks & Recreation/GolfCourse PRESENTED BY: Peter Keogh Parks & Recreation Director SUBJECT: Fairwinds Golf Course Pavilion BACKGROUND: Board of County Commission approved funding of $100,000 for this project at the final budget hearing for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 on September 13, 2001 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Building Account No. 418-7260-562000-700 in the amount of $100,000. Engineering consulting fees from Thomas Lucido and Associates in the amount of $9,000 will be transferred, through the line-to- line procedure, into the appropriate account Buildings - Consulting Engineer No. 418-7260-562005-700. PREVIOUS ACTION: NA RECOMMENDATION: Parks and Recreation/Fairwinds Golf Course staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners: I. Approve Board Chairman signature to contract with Thomas Lucido & Associates for Professional Services relating to the Fairwinds Golf Course Pavilion project and; 2. Approve the Scope of Work as outlined on page 2 of the above referenced contract. COMMISSION ACfION: CONCURRENCE: [~APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Review and Approvals -71:- x)COL..:.nty Attorney:_ f/ x)Gol:' Course: ~ X)Management & BUdget1j--VV\\fV\~~ x)Purchasing: Eff. 11/4/93 '-' '-' MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commission FROM: Peter Keogh, Parks & Recreation Director VIA: Timothy Coolican, Golf Course Manager 1}-/ DATE: January 22,2002 RE: Fairwinds Golf Course Pavilion Thomas Lucido & Associate Professional Services Contract On September 13, 2001, during the final budget process for Fiscal Year 2001-2002, the Board considered Fairwinds Golf Course request to build a 40 ft gazebo/pavilion to accommodate overflow from the café and grill during tournament and special events held at the golf course throughout the year. The overall cost of this facility will be approximately $100,000. This figure includes professional services for design of landscaping and hardscape, revision of existing cart paths, possible relocation of restroom, service areas, and oversight of the project. RECOMMENDATION: Parks and Recreation/Fairwinds Golf Course staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Approve Board Chairman signature to contract with Thomas Lucido & Associates for Professional Services relating to the Fairwinds Golf Course Pavilion project and; 2. Approve the Scope of Work as outlined on page 2 of the above referenced contract. I' '-' .....I CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of ,2001, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and THOMAS LUCIDO & ASSOCIATES, P .A., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County desires to retain the professional services of the Consultant to provide planning services for a proposed expansion to the clubhouse at Fairwinds Golf Course; and, WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to provide the County with such services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises made herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by each party, the parties intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS AGREEMENT The relationship of the Consultant to the County will be solely that of a consultant. The Consultant is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent of the County. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the County and the Consultant, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant will provide the professional and technical services required for the successful completion of this Agreement in accordance with practices generally acceptable within the industry and good ethical standards. G: \A TIY\AGREEMNT\LUCIDO- F AIRWINDS -1- \wi 2. SCOPE OF WORK .....,¡ The scope of work to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement is to provide planning services for expansion of the clubhouse at Fairwinds Golf Course located in Fort Pierce, Florida, more specifically described as follows: Preparation of detailed site plan of proposed facility expansion indicating 40ft gazebo, pedestrian access, revision to existing cart path connections, restrooms, service areas, etc. sufficient for approval by St. Lucie County. Preparation of detailed hardscape and landscape treatment of proposed facility retaining wall (stacked limerock), "flatwork" (precast pavers/concrete) for cart "cul-de-sac" and pedestrian plaza, landscape and irrigation for design area. Preparation of construction details and specifications for plaza, steps, wall, landscape and irrigation. Coordination with gazebo manufacturer on specifications and construction details necessary for installation. Coordination with County on bidding and installation. 3. PROJECT MANAGER The Project Manager for the County is Tim Coolican at (561) 462-2722. The Project Manager for the Consultant is Gregory Boggs at (561) 467-1301. The parties shall direct all matters arising in connection with the performance of this Agreement, other than invoices and notices, to the attention of the Project Managers for attempted resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall coordination and oversight relating to the performance of this Agreement. 4. TERM The term of this Agreement shall be for one (1) year beginning November 1, 2001. The parties agree that the Agreement may be extended upon mutual agreement of the parties, 5. TIME OF PERFORMANCE The Consultant shall complete the scope of work on or before February 1, 2002. G: \..1 TTY\AGREEMNT\LUCIDO-F AIRWINDS -2- '-' 6. COMPENSATION .....,¡ The Consultant shall be compensated for all services rendered under this Agreement as follows: Fees shall be billed on a fixed fee basis of Nine Thousand and 0/100 Dollars ($9,000,00) EXPENSES: Reimbursable expenses shall include reproduction, travel, courier, and telephone costs, and shall be filled on a monthly basis in addition to professional service fees subject to the provisions of Section 112.061, Florida Statutes. TERMS: Fixed fee shall be billed monthly on a percentage complete basis, and are due upon receipt. Invoices shall be considered past due forty-five (45) days from date of billing. Work process shall stop after account is ninety (90) days in arrears. In connection with any litigation, including appellant proceedings, arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover any amounts due and/or unpaid, together with costs, interest, and reasonable attorney's fees, In the event any invoice or any portion thereof remains unpaid for more than sixty (60) days following the invoice date, the consultant may stop work and initiate collection and/or legal proceedings to collect the same. All original drawings shall be the property of St. Lucie County. All plans, documents, and graphics are to be considered accepted by the Client after Client review and acceptance. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Additional services required as a result of substantial changes in the established project program or concept, unforeseen constraints or as requested by the Client will be billed under separate contract. This includes revising previously approved drawings or other documents to accomplish changes not initiated by Consultant. HOURLY RATES: Director Project Designer III: Project Designer II: $125.00 $ 75.00 $ 70.00 Project Designer I: Project Designer: Clerical Support: $55.00 $45.00 $30.00 G: \A TTY\ AGREEMNT\LUCIDO-FArRwrND5 -3- '-" 7. DEFAULT; TERMINATION ....,¡ A. FOR CAUSE If either party fails to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement in a timely and proper manner, the other party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of any deficiency and by allowing the party in default seven (7) calendar days to correct the deficiency. If the defaulting party fails to correct the deficiency within this time, this Agreement shall terminate at the expiration of the seven (7) calendar day time period. With regard to The Consultant, the following items shall be considered a default under this Agreement: (1) If the Consultant should be adjudged bankrupt, or if he, or it, should make a general assignment for the benefit of his, or its, creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of his, or its, insolvency. (2) If the Consultant should persistently or repeatedly refuse or fail, except in cases for which an extension of time is provided, to provide the services contemplated by this Agreement. (3) If the Consultant disregards laws, ordinances, or the instructions of the Project Manager or otherwise is guilty of a substantial violation of the provisions of the Agreement. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall only be entitled to receive payment for work satisfactorily completed prior to the termination date. B. WITHOUT CAUSE The obligation to provide further services under this agreement may be terminated without cause by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice. In the event of any termination, the consultant will be paid for all services rendered to the date of termination, all expenses subject to reimbursement hereunder. In the event the Consultant's compensation under this Agreement is a fixed fee, upon such termination, the amount payable to the Consultant for services rendered will be a proportional amount of the total fee based on the ratio of the amount of the work completed to the total amount of services which was to have been performed, less prior partial payments, if any, which have been made. The fee G \A TTY\AGREEMNT\LUCrDO-F ArRwrNDS -4- '-" '-' and timing for the quote above is valid for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this contract. 8. FORCE MAJEURE Neither party shall be liable to the other for failure to perform its obligations hereunder if and to the extent that such failure to perform results from causes beyond its reasonable control (financial difficulty shall not be considered a cause beyond a party's control), all of which causes herein are called "Force Majeure", including, but without being limited to, strikes, lockouts, or other industrial disturbances: fires: unusual climatic conditions: acts of God: acts of a public enemy; or inability to obtain transportation or necessary materials in the open market. The party unable to perform as a result of force majeure promptly shall notify the other of the beginning and ending of each such period, and County shall compensate Consultant at the rates set forth herein, for the services performed by Consultant hereunder, up to the date of the beginning of such period. If any period of force majeure continues for thirty (30) days or more, either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the other party. 9. ASSIGNMENT The County and Consultant each binds itself and its successors, legal representatives, and assigns to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and permitted assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this Agreement; and, neither the County nor the Consultant will assign or transfer its rights and obligations in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of any public body which may be a party hereto, The Consultant agrees that the persons named in the scope of work shall provide services as described therein. The services of the person(s) so named are a substantial inducement and material consideration for this Agreement. In the event such persons can no longer provide the services required by this Agreement, the Consultant shall immediately notify the County in writing and the County may elect to terminate this Agreement without any liability to the Consultant for unfinished work product. The County may elect to compensate the Consultant for unfinished work product. provided it is in a form that is sufficiently documented and organized to provide for subsequent utilization in completion of the work product. G \A TIY IAGREEMNT\LUCIDO-F AIRWINDS -5- '-" 10. SUBCONSUL T ANTS AND SUBCONTRACTORS ""'" In the event the Consultant requires the services of any subconsultant, subcontractor or professional associate in connection with the services to be provided under this Agreement, Consultant shall secure the written approval of County Project Manager before engaging such subconsultant, subcontractor or professional associate. 11. AUDIT The Consultant agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Consultant involving transactions related to this Agreement. The Consultant agrees that payment(s) made under this Agreement shall be subject to reduction for amounts charged thereto which are found on the basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this Agreement. The Consultant shall refund by check payable to the County the amount of such reduction of payments. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or three years after completion of the project and issuance of the final certificate, whichever is sooner. 12. PUBLIC RECORDS The Consultant shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the Consultant in conjunction with this Agreement. 13. INSURANCE Commercial General Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commencement of this contract, provide the County with evidence of commercial general liability insurance to include: 1) premises/operations, products/completed operations, (including XCU hazards) and personal and advertising injury for limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence; 2) fire damage for limits of not less than $100,000 per occurrence; 3) medical payments for limits not less than $5,000 per person and 4) a general, per contract/project, aggregate limit of not less than $2,000,000, The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal and include County as an additional insured. G: \A TTY\AGREEMNT\LUCIDO·FAIRWINDS -6- '-' ....,.¡ Business Automobile Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commencement of this contract, provide the County with evidence of business automobile liability insurance to include: 1) coverage for any automobile for limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit (bodily injury & property damage) per accident and 2) Personal Injury Protection (Florida no-fault) with full statutory limits. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal and include County as an additional insured. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commence of this contract, provide the County with evidence of workers' compensation insurance providing Florida statutory (F.S. 440) limits to cover all employees and include Employers Liability coverage with limits of not less than $500,000 for accidents or disease. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal. 14, INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant covenants and agrees at all times to save, hold, and keep harmless the County, its Officials, Employees, and Agents, and indemnify the County, its Officials, Employees, and Agents, against any and all claims, demands, penalties, judgements, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and liability of every kind and nature whatsoever to the extent arising out of or in any way connected or arising out of the Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Only those matters which are determined by a final, non-appealable judgment to be the result of the negligence of the County or the negligence of a third party who is not an agent, employee, invitee, or subcontractor of the Consultant shall be excluded from the Consultant's duty to indemnify the County, but only to the extent of negligence of the County or such third party. The Consultant hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this Agreement include specific consideration for the indemnification herein provided. 15. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any persons, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award of making this Agreement. G \ A Tn'\AGREEMNT\LUCIDO-F A IRWIND5 -7- 16. 'w ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS 'wi In the event of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions of this Agreement or in the event of any action by any party to this Agreement to judicially interpret or enforce this Agreement or any provision hereof, or in any dispute arising in any manner from this Agreement, subject to the provisions of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes and in no way altering the extent of the County's liability under 768.28, Florida Statutes, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs, fees and expenses, including but not limited to, witness fees, expert fees, consultant fees, attorney, paralegal and legal assistant fees, costs and expenses and other professional fees, costs and expenses, whether suit be brought or not, and whether any settlement shall be entered in any declaratory action, at trial or on appeal. 17. NON DISCRIMINATION The Consultant covenants and agrees that the Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment to be employed in the performance of the Agreement with respect to hiring, tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of age, sex or physical handicaps (except where based on a bonafide occupational qualification); or because of marital status, race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry. 18. VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS The Consultant agrees that it shall bear the responsibility for verifying the employment status, under the Immigration Reform and Control act of 1986, of all persons it employs in the performance of this Agreement. 19. NOTICE All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: As To County: St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce,. Pierce, FL 34982 With A Copy To: St. Lucie County Attorney Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce,. Pierce, FL 34982 G: \A TIY\AGREEMNT\LUCIDO-F AIRWINDS -8- '-' ~ As To The Consultant: Thomas Lucido & Associates, P.A. 100 Avenue A, Suite 2A Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 20. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Consultant, its employees, subcontractors or assigns, shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the performance of this Agreement. The County undertakes no duty to ensure such compliance, but will attempt to advise Consultant, upon request, as to any such laws of which it has present knowledge. 21. TRUTH-IN-NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE Execution of this Agreement by Consultant shall act as the execution of as truth-in- negotiation certificate stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation of this Agreement are accurate, complete and current at the time of execution of the Agreement. The original Agreement rates and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which County determines the Agreement rate(s) was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such rate adjustments shall be made within one year following the end of this Agreement. 22. NON-WAIVER The rights of the parties under this Agreement shall be cumulative and the failure of either party to exercise properly any rights given hereunder shall not operate to forfeit any of the said rights. 23. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Consultant represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance G: \1\ m\I\GREEMNT\LucrDO-FI\!RW!NDS -9- '-' ,.." of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes 112.311. The Consultant further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said performance. The Consultant shall promptly notify the County in writing by certified mail of all potential conflicts of interest prohibited by existing state law for any prospective business association, interest or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence the Consultant's judgment or quality of services being provided hereunder. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of work that the Consultant may undertake and request an opinion of the County as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the County, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the Consultant. The County agrees to notify the Consultant of its opinion by certified mail within thirty (30) days of receipt of notification by the Consultant. If, in the opinion of the County, the prospective business association, interest or circumstance would not constitute a conflict of interest by the Consultant, the County shall so state in the notification and the Consultant shall, at his/her option, enter into said association, interest or circumstance and it shall be deemed not in conflict of interest with respect to services provided to the County by the Consultant under the terms of this Agreement 24. LITIGATION SERVICEs It is understood and agreed that the Consultant's services under this Agreement do not include any participation, whatsoever, in any litigation. Should such services be required, a supplemental agreement may be negotiated between the County and the Consultant describing the services desired and providing a basis for compensation to the Consultant. 25. DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any disputes relating to interpretation of the terms of this Contact or a question of fact or arising under this Contract shall be resolved through good faith efforts upon the part of the Contractor and the County or its Project Manager. At all times, the Contractor shall carryon the work and maintain its progress schedule in accordance with the requirements of the Contract and the determination of the County or its representatives, pending resolution of the dispute, Any dispute which is not resolved by mutual agreement shall be decided by the County Administrator who shall reduce the decision to writing. The decision of the County shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, so grossly erroneous as to necessarily imply bad faith, or not be supported by substantial evidence. G: \1\ TTY\1\GREEMNT\LUCIDO-F 1\IR WINDS -10- 26. "-" MEDIA TION ..,1 Prior to initiating any litigation concerning this Contract, the parties agree to submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non-binding mediation. The parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding concerning the disputed issue. 27. INTERPRETATION; VENUE This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Agreement may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this Agreement in counterparts each of which shall be treated as an original upon the terms and conditions above stated, ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY G: \A TTY\AGREEMNT\LUCIDO·F AIR WINDS -11- '-' ',"", THOMAS LUCIDO & ASSOCIATES, P.A. WITNESSES: BY: <Î)." /,Á / Title: ..J....ð(~ G: \A TTY\AGREEMNT\L UCIDÇJ-f A IRWIND5 -12- Ji\n 03 21 10: 18a !H/fJ312!Jð2 Ie· ~ FAIRIJINDS G C 56146713EB 561-462-3589 THOMAS LLClOO .:Issac F' . 1 ...",,¡ PAGE ð2 ACQßD. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE R.Y. ¡ok..oA ~C7, 2041 SK Oo-.n alvd lit....,.. rr. 3.,., , Ph...., ~'1-287-13" r.......D Ino. lID LJP I ...,. ,......., Tttœa-4 02120/01 'htI C:I."'ICATI. tUUn AI A urn. 0' WOIIMATIOII 0IIl' /UIØ COM'III.IIO NOIIT. W'ON 1MI CIII""",, TI HOLDIII. TN. ClmPIC:ATI DaU 1ID,.1oMÞCI, IXTIND Oil AI. TU T" CO¥tIIAØE ",'0It0lD IV TN!! POl1ClU anow .--..c... r..:~'1-2a'-443' IIØUIIIIII AFJIO.OWO C:OIIIAAOE no.... l.....:l.dO , Ae._i.te. 2o\IG:l.do , liolLPotetgn , ~.cido' .oe Atea 322 ~ru1. _..... nUa:t r.t 140116 , COVIftAG... ~-~ Baa:t.tord OIodeZ'Orit_. ........".. A.",t..-o.a~. la.~....a. ;;;';;;;·--r-;¡-';-cit,.. ru. In... _.0' ç~_._- "'- --.--. '....... . T>oE ~UC:IIS Of'''''''''''''''1 .,ITIO atI._........ IUH 1&1U1O To now: """'10 _........... 'O~ THll'Ouev ~I"JOO _,ç.orcD >'O""''''.,~ - ¡"!QUI~I-,". Tn.. 011 e_"OH or ......COHTNACT Do .~ ~ WITH "n"'<:T TO "HCIt,.... Ç(IITIn<:AT£ /lAY I. 'UU£O 00 ...., ".OTA !;, '"I ~ "''''() I OED 8Y '1CTi JOOUCIIiS DWICIII'HD "'''IIN 1.lIJaJeCT TO "LL THI TOW. ÐCQ.LII1QNIIWO ~ITlOHS 01' SVCH oot.'C:'EI, AOOtIIQ O,'I LMT. IHOII\OI MIIY ......VI.I.N otoucco... ~_ <:,.._ ~~ r# '''·'OII~ -....- . -.. ~Wla.lr' I.lOl OCCU'Nl'l!/tC! I, 1000000 A ¡.!. Ô~Of_'MkJTV 21SUDIOU' 01/01/01 al/Dl/OZ '-'¡~""""""'I I. 300000 i-- "--'......of W OCC\.llt \oEJ £WI¡.,.....~ · SOOO .~"Ioþy----, , 1000000 - , Z 000000 - c,e4A.I.L 4QQ,IIUATE ~ aGcaec.n~'Vtn MCOI..CT'I. C~ ~ 12000000 AQo..'C.,. '"':',.~ LOC .!:::!..T~.~.......,.. C~P'tOL.II,þf"! I ~OOOOO B ¡.!. 1Io'wo,.........O U.!U4!11100 01/01/01 01../01/02 IJ:..r.....1 '- ....CI'o'H!O~. .x». ., w.;vRI" , t""""""" '- kt-E~·..U,O""'O:l I- -""'os 0000.......... I, i"""'.........,q f--. ~ OYotoCO.ll4/10J f-- --- , .... let... ÔIl........-.1rr AtíTO ON.. ',,, £A ACCœ,..T I -- r ÞNf MOra _DT CO'W'IIIIJœ I Ol'~ltr~ rA~ · I AV"O (I....,. ... · r :r'-'" ~ OCC\A'llt'I'U · oCC\,/Q 0,............ IIOT CDVKIIJœ AOQIIItOAft · I , ~"""""'o..c , .0- J · ~'.OW'IIdA'...AIIIIO I ~-:.:.~. I IO~: ............ L.....f'f ~ ç09D.l:J) 1....~<lC'ec,... · f", ~.f<to~O'<tt · Ii,L OIIIÞM· ..~." ~ · 0_ c: REot'.~.LG""1. W»C0.u00~:"00 01/01/01 01/01/02 "00.000 Li.ah11ir:. ..aaw-1'IðIoI0f'DP·_'~oc:..'~~~_""~r..ØofttIIL~ C.rt,1.r1....t.. balder 1. : .: ,.ted .. .dd.i.t.J._.l t........,..¡. JII: ; ~c Mab1l. aa.e coa~.ot n.o.n:CT : 'atOI C~~TW1CATI! HOUIIII it 1___,_..... CAMClLLATIOH In.uco1 bIOUI,.."., _ .,................-NI1UO_ ..~_..~~ .......,.M)tII .....,. .,.,.~. ......... ....,,.. -.... -..-..-.. 1'0 IIIWiIII" ~ ..".."'......... _'he' TO,.... ...'.-e....1IIIO\00I....... '" "'" \1'1'. ..,., ,""..,... '0 aD.......... _~_oe...""'~~\.-'''''T QIIO_. __ '_~\'.~"''''' ellll aT LUCUõ COUIftT ........"..,..... 2JOO V%aG%K%A AVE. -.J7 /~e. ///~ rr ~IEaCE rt 34t82-~.~2 , OACOADColl~O~~N'" 1lC0AD B.& ['''') , ~ \wr AGENDA REQUEST ITEM'Ptd. C-2c DATE: January 22,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Director, Parks & Recreation SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Reimbursement to the Parks & Recreation's budget for dollars expended to accommodate the AMISTAD Sailing Ship's visit and approval of Budget Amendment # 02-118. BACKGROUND: On October 23, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved Agreements with the Sea Scout Ship "Edwin Binney" Foundation Inc. and AMIST AD America Inc. In addition to approval of the Agreements, the Board at the AMIST AD Host Committee's request directed staff to provide certain services and accommodations including specific site preparation. As a caveat to the agenda approval, staff was instructed to keep track of expenses for future reimbursement by the BOCC. The total amount of reimbursement requested is $ 9,554.00 and a breakdown of expenses is attached with documentation for review. FUNDS AVAILABLE IN: Please see attached budget amendment (cont ingency) PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners approve reimbursement of the Parks & Recreation budget for dollars expended to accommodate the AMISTAD Sailing Ship's visit in the amount of $ 9,554.00 and approve Budget Amendment # 02- 118. [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: C~í ,./4 Originating Dept: ,)'1~ Coordination/Siqnatures Mgt. & Budget: ~ rmM~ Other: Purchasing Mgr.: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, If Applicable) Eft. 1/97 H:\AMistad reimb agenda.wpd , , BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMB FOR THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PREPARED DATE: 01/14/02 AGENDA DATE: 01/22/02 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME Ar;16(,NT ...... TO: 001-7210-534000-700 Other Contractual Services $2,860 001-7210-546000-700 Eauipment Maintenance $1,906 001-7210-546100-700 Buildinq Maintenance $651 001-7210-551100-700 Small Tools $5 001-721 0-512000-700 Eauipment < $750 $1 108 001-7210-552000-700 Operatina Supplies $68 001-7210-544100-700 Eauipment Rental $835 001-7210-512000-700 Salaries $433 001-7210-514000-700 Overtime $1,007 001-7910-513100-700 Temporary Staff $60 001-7910-513000-700 Part-time Permanent Staff $100 001-7910-514000-700 Overtime for Staff $356.48 001-7910-534000-700 Other Contractual Services $125.00 001-7910-552000-700 Operatinq Supplies $40.00 FROM: 0019910-599100-800 Contingency $9,554 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: To reimburse the Parks and Recreation Department for fundinq expended in accommodatinq the AMISTAD Sailin¡¡ Ship, CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: ~ BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-118 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: G:\BUDGET\QUA TTRO\GENERAL \FORMSIAMENDM02,wb3 · ' DEPARTMENT Approved Budget Proposed action: \. FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 FUNDS APPROVED FROM CONTINGENCY GENERAL FUND AMOUNT REMAINING: $856,867 ITEM ACCOUNT # Contingency 001-9910-599100-800 Reserved for Supervisor of Elections Supervisor of Elect. Loan Payoff to Suntrust Bank Tourism Recovery Plan in Partnership with FLAUSA AS400 Public Safety Software Upgrade Total used: Balance Available Reimbursement of expenses for the AMISTAD Sailing Ship Balance Available After Proposed Action: G:\BUDGET\QUA TTRO\GENERAL\FORMSIAMENDM02.wb3 ....¡ AMOUNT 1,107,452 $107,452 $5,648 $109,931 $18,000 241,031 866,421 9,554 856,867 DATE 10/01 10/09 11/20 12/18 01/22 '-' Agenda Item # C2-C ....I Attachment for: 01l22/~ BOCC Meetine: Amistad EXDense Breakdown Parks Division Catel!orv Account Number Security 001-7210-534000-700 Materials 001-7210-546000-700 001-7210-546100-700 001-7210-551100-700 001-7210-512000-700 001-7210-552000-700 DJ Portable Toilets 001-7210-544100-700 Salaries 001-7210-512000-700 001-7210-514000-700 Historical Museum Catel!orv Account Number Salaries 001-7910-513000-700 001-7910-513100-700 001-7910-514000-700 Maintenance 001-7910-534000-700 001-7910-552ÒOO-700 Materials Account DescriDtion Other Contractual Services Equipment Maintenance Building Maintenance Small Tools Equipment < $750 Operating Supplies . Equipment Rental Salaries Overtime (33.5 Hours) Staffing costs does not include exempt employees or routine maintenance performed on grounds that would have been performed on a weekly basis regardless of Amistad visit. Parks Total: Account DescriDtion Dollar Amount $ 2,860.00 $1,905.70 $ 650.55 $ 4.77 $ 1,107.60 $ 67.29 $ 3,735.91 $ 835.00 $ 432.16 $ 1.006.26 $ 1,438.42 $8.869.33 Dollar Amount Part-Time Permanent Staff Temporary Staff Overtime for Staff Other Contractual Services Operating Supplies $99.84 $59.40 $356.48 $125.00 $ 40.00 Historical Museum Total: $ 680.72 Total Reimbursement Amount Requested: $ 9.550.05 \...- ~...I.~Lì.iCIP. COUNTY. B,OP.T.il~ l?tm.CF.!.A..C:;p, CONFIm:1\TIO!:~ r.E~':I·F.R lUlU CHECK REç¡ÙEST J:'mk~ .......1 ,. . '1'0: Helen Tomlin - j;'ínance Acct. Payable E'J:'.OM: Bette Hofher - Parks-Parks & Recreation DATE: 12/20/01 Þ'_:;]Œ C::ŒO: ? A7.?..ELZ ~O: Sheriff St. Lucie County VE~mOR ª 632 }Œ.rtSON: 3DilihChus~ . . Security at i~~ .\irpðrt-for~he Amistad Event I"~C(¡W;:; O? (";:::::c::;~: ::; 2,860.00 l":..r:C.Gill:iT ~O 32 CE..~:..7tG2D: 001-7210-534000-700 APPROVAL: . DEPARTMENT HEAD: x MAI!. CEEc..~ TO VENDOR S2m) CHECK ro DDA1t':I- IP ~M\jCÜ-~.~ ¥. @ ¿hR.~p ~ Ô!(!-' HOLD cm::CX FOR PIa UP DI FINANCZ \ ~.' rf ~~z<AJù 14-/~!6 r '-' ( '§hcriff , KEN J. MASCARA 4700 West Midway Road, Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 DATE: December 18, 2001 TO: Linda Brown Parks & Recreation 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 FROM: Carolyn Dodge Uniform Patrol Division RE: i -' ...., ~ - -. Member National Sheriffs' Association Member Florida Sheriffs' Association Telephone: (561) 461·7300· Fax: (561) 489-5851 .,. INVOICE to tJ 1- '1 ~ / (¡ ~,~ 3 Cf & tfJéJ... 7t7 [J The goo~5 ~f1dJor services as billed heroon ha.,.o biª~ r~çeived in the ~ntity and qUi\lilY !Iàt~d. f. 0.. it ~ AMISTAD SECURITY DETAIL Below is a list of deputies from the St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office, hours aRd amount owed ($20.00 per houri for security at the St. Lucie County ^irpsrt. ~o .CtuJ.5òiJOL..L Thank you for your prompt attention. (f Colton, Mike 262-99-6101 Ruggeri, James 075-70-4416 Soesbe, Robert 485-60-9705 Wesley, Darnell 265-55-6969 Cohron, Ronald 263-80-6703 LeBeau, Edgar 012-60-9163 Hill, Christopher 07~- 7') "')37 J OAv ~ ~'V-V Fernandez, rfÙ 164 t í _~ ' Â~\D w.. ~~ i-"7~""W 12-10-01 7 hrs. 12-10-01 8hrs. 12-10-01 8hrs. 12-11-01 8hrs. 12-11-01 8 hrs. 12-11-018hrs. 12-12-01 8 hrs. 12-12-01 12-14-01 8 hrs. 8 hrs. Total 1 40.00 160.00 160.00 1 60.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 320.00 '- -....1-... -.. . ' . . I , Parks & Recreation Page 2 Cavallaro, Tony 265-77-8790 12-12-01 8 hrs. 160.00 12-13-01 8 hrs. 160.00 12-14-01 8 hrs. 160.00 Total 480.00 Ziarkowski, Rich 381-82-8629 12-13-01 8 hrs. 160.00 Carter, Kevin 182-48-6436 12-13-01 8 hrs. 160.00 Woods, Mark 234-13-9993 1 2 -1 4-01 8 hrs. 160.00 DiFrancesco, Dena 589-52-8531 12-15-01 8 hrs. 160.00 Woods, Matthew 593-26-9461 12-15-01 8 hrs. 160.00 .. Harbin, Byron 527-65-1593 12-15-01 8 hrs. 160.00 '-' J Salary for Lee Kehres Crew: Routine maintenance performed on grounds would have been performed on a weekly basis regardless of Amistad. 11/29/01 3 - Personnel to move Museum exhibits 3 hrs. $ 114.60 12/5/01 2 - Men to haul shale and direct traffic 4 hrs. $ 88.68 For Road and Bridge grading to South Causeway. 12/6/01 6 - Men to move more exhibits 2 hrs. $ 136.90 12/6/01 2 - Men on Overtime 5 hrs. $ 124.34 12/6/01 Nelson Parrett - Electrician 6 hrs. $ 91.98 12/8/01 2 - Men on Overtime 9.5 hrs. $ 307.94 12/9/01 2 - Men on Overtime 9.5 hrs. $ 286.99 12/15/01 2 - Men on Overtime 9.5 hrs. $ 286.99 Total: $1.438.42 .EC SUPPLY CO. . À IN...lNDUSTRIAl SUPPLIES" $ALœð - REMIT TO: ~,GE AVENUE FOJ\f"""PlÉRCE. FL ~7 Phone: 181-48.. 8ÎÓO . J ".' Fa: ' 181-488 3497 INVOICE CUSTQMER , , }do NÒV ~ 92001 F.e.1. 58-1~7 ' SHIP PARI<S DIVISION TO: BILL ST. LUCIE CO. BOARD OF COUNTY ~COMMISSIONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVEM.E FORT PIERCE, FL 34982 1,0., 100 100 100 100 100 " ----- ----- ------ , < ) C.US'ER COpy . ] THAt'¡K \IOU ) TURt~ER IHDlISTRIAL FORT PIERCE ~ 3578001413890130 -. 07 APPROI.}AL CODE ) DEC 05. 01 1314697 CUSTOMER P.O. NÖ. 2210349 3 SSCE',-14Xl4 CARR BOLT 55--1/4 X 4 SSCLN-14 LOCKNUT USS S5--1/4 SSF'"I- 1l. Fh~!WA~~R 5S--1/4 1'1-34 q rWASHER 55--3/4 0.2300 2:3.00 0.0360 :3.60 0.0100 1.00 A 0.1500 7.bO ... r /OJ"" G v-fo ()(),. 700 ~ T e goods and/or s rvices as billed h reon have been r ceived in "'. antity and quality stated, J U! '~)- i·, -, ¡ '. , .' , I . r_X" ~\'? ' - ) 4715290øø2375165-J : VISA 132/01 ) SALE ROC # 406708 TERMIt~AL # 501303'31 '3 mDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES ) - BASE AMOUNT ) TAX AMOUNT I TOTAL ) , I .J I ~ ~ ,)~ ~ (!) -\ SU,8TPJA1. 35.10 F.':\FIßHT 1'9TAL ST~TE ~ 0.00 AMT DIJE ~>''':. 1fì " ~~ .' .}', ~ ~. ..~~., ." 2 7.3700 14.74 ,- , :,'2 4.3600 8.72 ". ,'. 2 1 .4600 < ~ . 0 5.8100 , , ~ ~ ";:? 1900 ~:..' '":i J'~ '", '- ~ :i~~~O:2'jOO t.o.. }'f~' ~ -~. '. " 2.92 ~=~"""'. . ~..;\, -~.'~ ' -,,-,- 23.48 .' .' e ~ '("" s' '·1: .j~: >::~~, .- 4"; . '1":'?" ,... ·I!J~C -AREA'S LEADER IN...INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES- 5ALCBO REMIT TO: INVOICE CUSTOMER 15000 ORANGE AVENUE . ...~./:;¡r.:~:,' FORT PIERCE. FL 34947 ~: '~', .' , . 'f' Phone: &81-484-8800QI)\\'" F.E.!.59-1466847" Fax: &81-488-3497 þt\\ a..'f\,'J .c¿" '- , , \£" "u _' ". 1453623 ';'0001:"0 f )t", 0" ~~ ST. LUCIE CO. BOARD OF COUNTY TO: COMMISSIONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE, FL j4982 SHIP SPECIFY DIVISION TO: f"-": CUSTOMER P.O. NO. 11/27/01 07:53:05 50 50 450-005 PLUG PVC THREADEO---1/211 200 200 SSPHTS-10X34 EA 0.0240 4.80, 55 PH TAP SCREW- t10 X 3/4 TT-I2:<520 EA 0.8900 0.89 TA.PE TE F LON 1/2 X 520 2 2 595jO EA. 2.7900 5.58 SIL !':ONE CL (56B)-3 OZ TUBE 1p() services as ¡lied received in Ih~ \) \~ ~ stated. , ' .' ...'..... . -, 0 ",' '," ~""" ,I '.. ". CODe EXPLANATION . . STIiIE TAX APPUCAIILE B-·IWANCE IW:K ORDERED C - CONSIDER COMPLE'Æ D . DIRECT SHIPMENT . THIS IS YOUR INVOICE SUBTOTAL 27.21 FREIGHT TOTAL STATE TAX 0.00 TOTAL AMT o '.IE , .~ - ~. '.. I,{ II'¡' Ii. 1111 H!. I' \. Q~"'~l\lcn ov .:t~URN~P I~ .u.aPLY...~ "ARE.6:S ~ER IN...INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES" "1:.".... I U: 1000 ORANGE AVENµE FORT PIERCE, FL 34M7 . . ~ ,'J!' Phone: 181-484 8800 '.. ~' "t'; Fex: 181~8 34,!7 ' IP4IYV. I~~ "t. '!J..'iIVMCn " :,. ~ 'EC'A . . -~"..\;:",..., :"..u NOV 0 9' "<'l,~' . , c¡ 20 ' . ":.;,.1'. ~1 t· "',' 0 F.E.!. 59-14ee647 .', '. .: ., ''':'(~' ' '.. '. " 1 . ...~ -'f"".,.:...~\:__: . (ll' l'lf! Ii ',-" ...._. ". ' -0.:"'- . SAlCBO . ' BILL TO: ST. .LUCIE CO. BOARD OF COUN COMMISsioNERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE, Fl 34~82 PARKS . "J'."__ CUSTOMER P.O. NO. . . . 11/28/0109:22:21 " 6 Eo 92-143-3P EA 1,1000 6.60 SA.W blADE SABRE--4 X 6T 92-523-3P EA 1.4000 Eo 4:' SAW BU\DE 4X10 HS 6&0 TANG 93730 fA 1.8400 7. e·/¡ BIT HLOR MAG 1/4i1H X 6" 92011 EA 0.3300 1. 32 IPS #2 PHILLIPS 111 6 6 4 4 '!-6 () () 7 (þ'D ices as billa ived in the ted. M_ I P. O. # CODE EXPLANATION . . STAr¡¡ TAX APPLICABlE II-·IIALANCE BACK ORDEÆD C . CONSIDER COMPlETE D . DIRECT SHIPMENT - .... RECEIVÈC BY~--/.£./ó --, I f.lll.ttf II. 11\1' .1' 'l I ,-,.... ., ~ 'IT·'¡:··, ?··,~V·· ~. \. ~~-:'''- .... -- SUBTOTAL 24.16 FREIGHT TOTAL STATE TAX 0.00 TOTAL AMT DUE ?L, . 1 F' , ~: '-" -....: .... THE NIBHLITER ....,..... ..... \. Residential SABAL PALM PLAZA :;.,_)YHOlESAlE DISTRIBUT~RS !l,C'O D;r, C' OJ, and, Commercial Lighting Fixtures and Supplies (; I TELEPHONE. .c61-m3 2411 SOUTH fEDERAL HIGHWAV '",~,; 2001 FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34982 J2j!3Jðl' r ~ MD. ~~~~ .. 0..-1 ~~j D I: L 1 V I: R I: D TO . o TO L D QUANTITY MJ'"O. CAT. NO. COLOR .. I,i CATION ..RICI: AMOUNT 77J , "'~ ~ &~O_ .... 7(jLfI ~ 'Il:1o,. ~..~. "¡ ^ ,. ~ ~~\~ S?à ~.\Ik /kfj d/ .~!dJ1 '/J -----. I 0. I \Q -~ -~'C :;> ->-"---~\ Q -.\\ X, V l~l :i ~ ~ 11 , . - V' '\ ( . ./ ) - . ./'" ""' . rwI~ 7~/~ ~ 5'l/-b 4- C{)- 7dJt) "- /\/>. I ( ./1)- '"')" Il, I rhe go~d$ ndlcr service as billa" '\. /' ?ÇZ/ / l ~, ')L 7 ,", L .:.. .J ;~ .L_ / - quantity an quality stale .. V Lf/ / ,,^ .1L I~ ,.. ~'" '\/ - . ,/ '- ...:....\ - " )IQfIIM' ...... !1'- .. , CREDIT TERMS. Net 10th Prox., Service Chlrgl 1 % compounded or 12% per ennum Ifter 30 dlY'· Return. NET "'PROYAL .ubject 10 25% rl.tocklng charge. No return. Ifter 30 day.. ALL SHIPMENTS VIA COMMON CARRIER TO BE FREIGHT COLLECT. Sale. Tex Purche,"r Icknowledgl' receipt of thl. merchandi.., In good condition unll" noled Ibove Ind there- fori we Ire not lilble for Ilbor co.t. to remove or Inst.1I merchlndi.e liter clllmed to be defectlvl. TOTAL Title to this ....rchandl.. and replotement. thereof remeln with .eller until merchandl.e I. fully plld for. Seld merchendi.e .hall remlin "' personal property until fully paid for. Purchl.er will pay ell co." of collection Including rel.oneble IHorneY'1 flel on unpaid Item.. We do not In.111I fixture. or permit __ ~ .. ~ .. - ...."~"'" g' lori' ...... ~ ........ -.... ..,.. ..- ,-- SPECIAL ORDERS All NONCANCE I. received within ten (10) deYI ° det. thereof. ABLE . 50% DEPOSIT REQUIRI Q~~~ CUSTOMER TO PAY AU SPICI FREIGHT AND PHONE CHAIIGES, D.,. N.. of AOINT Of PURCHASER Shl .d Cllton. PP TITLE TD A.DVE MERCHANDISE TO REMAIN WITH THE HIIJHL.ITER UNTIL INVDICE IS PAID IN P'ULL ~~ßß. ..ø- \ . \ mEt c~~ CONso~~~L;-.10 ZONE. I. E LEe T R I C A L SUP P LIE S.: - a.EC'D NOV.2 6Z001 SHIPPED BY: \ , . . ) ATE 11/2 1/01 ~ /f" ~ ~ H PAC KIN G LIST~~'~ "ASE ¡ ",.' 0RDERED 11/21/01 ~EuaIRED 11/21/01 ~ROMISEO 00/00/00 CUSTOMER P/O:P221e070 S\IP-VIA: we 0HONE 000-000-0000 !NVGlte SØ-09091E ·~ICKi;:T WAITE~/SL~N 08/8] 5 ~ I ~ TO: 0~ P. III TO: ¿~-93&~Ø-ØØØ 0ØØ00-·'i\OØ" 5T LUCIE ~OI1RD ;~F CGUN';"'! COi'iMISS!Of\ERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE ~ORT 0IERCE FLORIGA 3,~982-::iS':,2 l~S10M¿~ tXCS~NGE NON T~XASLr ACCOU~TS f ;CCT-NAME: C~ST~~~p fYC~ANGE TA~CODE: ~60ØØ50 TYOE: ST~CK CHARGE J08 1!AME II!~~TR: 6 5 ~~L 50) ] /2 o/C SUS~EO NIPPLf NAED: 7~;~-S4;00 WK L ~,00 WML.ØØ =.JIG ;:.~!C;; 2H~ . 41 ~. 25 .10 ¡::' .sc E ., " . i '3 [ " 18. oÏ'I::-. -:JRDERED- -S'!TP~'¿D- _u_________ DE.SCRIPlION --.-----,..--- ?J" 6 5 G8 * THR-250 2-1/2 2~ CONa STRAF NAEù: ~~:6-62:S0 WLì..3Ø'" Wi.. L :cø , . :'TE Q21ØØ ;: F' 10(;>(' 1 ;:(\/2"0:-' CS ;;~. ë: to : ? è C 3 -1 -";; (. 8 l-! G R 8(''':- ¡ 1 !I~ Q260 ~~ ~'A ].20/2~ev ce N~ED: ;641~1t,aõ~ LJGPSOØ 4 4 ~.~ ~1~0 ~~20~ ~20!2~0V CE WGR¿;00 :\1.-\ f Q ~ ::Sl;":J.· .l4::~S (PiP/- r~/,9- G'r¡-6~' 1~¿J The gqods and/or services as biDed h.reoñ have been received in th. quantity a2J quality stated. ../ P. o. *-T~~/ po1'iNc_ ¿¡'rI~d ~ . 9 ~,~ _.~ S' t~ {~(Sl,qbf:ï/~-,.¡1) S!JBTOTAL: 51.::'5 -AX: TOT/!.L: 07:47 ' DATE: ___1_1__ THE: _ -;:REC P~CKED BV: CHECKED BVi B~XES: PIECES: REELS.::·. . PALLETS: - ITY .... '-' PO BOX 881509 PORT ST LUCIE FLORIDA 34988 PHONE # 561 871 0115 FAX # 561 871 0118 ~·r. D NOV 292001 ...J PORT ST LUCIE '.'~ ;".-- . LECTRIC UP PLY co. SALES INVOICE NO.: PSL 23/61195 SOLD TO: ACCOUNT NO. 230018000 ST LUCIE COUNTY 2300 VIRGINIA AVE FT PIERCE, FL 34982 7.14 SHIP TO: WILL CALL] DEBBIE HUFMEN VISA/4715-2900-0237-5371/ EX01-02/AUTH DATE: , 11/28/01 CUST. P/O NO. I< JOB NAME/NO.: T DOCI< Q/O 201 1 BID DESCRIPTION ISYLVANIA CF13DD 8411 , (20708)+FLUOR DULUI SHIP UNIT PRC @ Dse I I I I 201 6.251EI I TOTAL 125.00 f.'?;~i~;~~¡~Ì!~:~~:;:¡f~ ;~~' ~ol-.7:? IC- ;5'lj-b C({JO- ~he goo~S and/or services as billed ereon have be:~n receivod' th ~. f I ..... In 8 quan.lty an::! qua¡i¡y stated. 7co ;:::::¡=¡i_E~=; [)F:Ç~FT P. O. #:. -- 0008175040536S88 ~1/i~{~19~b~~~~~:7i E:~P. 0102 ~Q: TPQNS iD 08133~7f1~:~;~'9~2:: I r-~ 1.) ~:ì I I:: E ;:" ¡:D ~~i r.:.:i- t-:~ U T H ~ ~.::"! ."t ~, :: _~~:"'5 3;'~~~ :;s:\¡~~ \.!\i ".. -". - . - INC_ ~!ilR!!d '--~ HM _ -.......;;: -- '::Ç¡~E TDTAL } } ..':::. ~J~..:< ,?::;>: ~' ,hi, ,~,::.; . ' ( ",,'~'='-;-;":. " J:i:,:'-";:-":~ " .'~" I ",.- ------'-->--, --'~, "', .,-,- . ,".... . . . ~ - ': ..,.. ¡' E¡:1- ':-0:, _.-..¡....-;;~.-. ·,:J..~'~'~:F SUBTOTAL 125.00 FREIGHT 0.00 SALES TAX 0.00 TOTAL $ 125.00 ~~ (vv\~ ,** P R ICE D COP Y *** .... C) C) N ~ c:> (.) l&J o ~ ~ ..... - @) © [] c::::J @ ~ C2 L....-.J ., ,--., '-.IL-J (,) z: ~ o 4)...... - ::1<- ~ cO> en QI "'f >1") ,¿J c(-J z vu- _:10. ..,.. Cw - /IIu (J 0 0.: o:t o~ ~ On. o· cr; 10 t L;J z ~ ~\ § \w ... 6ì I Mwg ,.¡ ~ I > (oj OJ ~ ... o -t~ r~ ~ o z w Ü 1-1 m Oz'J ~¡¡J .:.. a: ....~ rn w -' 0( rn 11'\ o~ 1I'\t1) an . ~~ . \:) o:t-.r \0...... o:t... .....1.0 ....11'\ ID-- 11'\)0( ......c:( ...... o .... Cl. :E rn IJJ .;) üS Z :~, l!... a: ... OZZOJ ....OCC(i CllJ..1"., e:: i I ~ a: (¡) w r'j 00::> ~Wa:....J Z u.. .0 cr p ~....., ~ ,J ü' Z !..u (fj....ü t.:.J.....CJC,: ~~f'Y'UJ Ui::;H :;!O=>C:. -1U is! I- I . & Q:: f-OMO UJ Ü O::J lJ.. \. -' ...-. -....I .' ,e '1-:; iSI ..tI ...... r-- i SI (\J CC·C( is! . šš.i 51 ¡¡1 . ..0, '" ~ ... ~ ...... ... ('IJ .... w " I E: N z ;:) .) X J ... à V ,,-() 0 Z L:,; (!) c.I Ú. '. z . a (;J ....¡::¡ 1-2 Ci.G: .... '- r::b () :', ; ...... W~ Q~ C:i.:J C::C a:;r¡ cr:::: .J lJ..lJ..1J.. (P !f) 50 (-1 o.D ..0 G~~ .,..,.<1+ c .... ~¡ 1i c£:C) ......'!-I........ ù"1 .)J ~ ... (-1 CI.J...J WWW lOWWØ ::JI-í-Z !J1lfJ.... (,1) ! ¡ Q:¡ WI: :J _! ....ZZI-a: .JOO I-~ Clcr:C:::I-W C:..........U1::~ ::J W', (I'J!-¡...e::Z \ ,:¡:a:: .....~ \ o .J .J C "-0 i ZlJ..lJ.......U)~e \1 , a: ..... w t"'\'-';; I := ..J~...cc ! (:) ..... \'J :>: 0 'í:3 .- I .J J: II) ""tI -d I~ I ~ r.! x ~: CD ~ G) "L"1' Po-t ..... :t: .~ -¡ 7õ - I c:::: uYl\l::¥1ft I t!.J ~ -.!! X Z "J ~ ... ~ ' I- ........ ::J t ... c ._ I ([":&:1. OQJïã i Z ¡-) 1'1 O:'J ~~~ & ii~ ~~-<t s s 51 ~ . 51 .,. iSI 51 . r-- 50 ... 11> . r-- a ... .,. ..J Œ I- a I- a;¡ :;l trJ X a: I- ..I ~ ~ r.n t!.I ...J c: (.') I I 4 -;,~->~ J. : , ""t1 "": ')1 -::-t .-' \:;>: 1. ,"'¡ u. .'-"-..: .... '. . z .' :3 a I 1'0 (J"J X (f}'>J a: t.:J .. I-I.Il W:> ...JO C1.!!i :Ea: a u~ 0;::' we :>:> ....z w.... U wz c:::c '. ~ 4: .~ '-' ~."'.I: Oadi".. 1\\' ,,\~~ 'l. ß 1\\\\\ B01~'1IC1I,P.';,':3~~ \\t " . (561)533.1450(_)112-1399 . (561) m-15OO PAX W1I'II'.I:iI JaIrkUo.COIII "Specialists in Irrigation, Landscape, Turf Care, Industrial Products &. Equipment" Docuaent: ItIYOice H* D U P LIe ATE 1** lPC Vendo,. ØIiØIIØ Cast I: 2121 PO Date 11127/81 ð .K~lColll NUll Invou:e Date, Order I 281591HØ Page . 1 Cor1'eSponderoce To: Bo)1Iton PuIIp & Irrigation Supply 7788 High Ridge R~d Boynton Beach, FL 3342b :, . ,: '."',, ~' , :.t, ,~ . .. lJ.1C l&antity Qu¡ntity (k¡¡nti ty Qty. ,Unit Price Discount IteMlI O'N!em B.D. . Shippéd 1M Price lI'I 1\11tiplier ææø 2 lCFT 2%.36 ,leFT, 8.813 Ship To: ST LOC1E BOMD CTY CO'tI' 2Jæ VIRGIMIII AIÆ. FT. PIERCE, FL 3495e Bill To: 51 L\l:IE BOI\RD tTY t:mI 2388 VIRGINIA AVEo < , ' - Instructions '": ¡ Ship Point Boynton Pulp & Irrigation FT. PIERCE, Ft 34'5 ' . Product ,¡,iii Ard Description 1 pp8QØ3Ø 3 SOl 88 :\IC PIPE 1 Lines Toul Oty Slipped Toul' . 2 , . ~ 1,þ POI SOJTH BEACH Ci1JSEVAV '"" " ¡- i Via CŒT PICK \II . .," Shipped T~ 1£138 ,," "_.-- IìIount (He\;) 5<12.72 Total Imoic:e Total 5'32.72 592.72 -::rt:- ' ,fJ'/ 1:1' 'C ~1. ,,~f. '5.10 I/¿) \{ , ('[ì /( .. ~ 1..:;'"'- l/v.. ' , -' '.. 1'ø fP('1 P/~I'" ì,G C¡-~6J_cf)Æ) .. () The 90bdSLa'ndlòr services as bill" hereon havè beèn ~éceived hilh. quantity and quality slaled. P. O. :#è"""- INC - S}GR'~~~~- Cash Discount 8.88 If Paid Within Te1'ti Boynton Pump & Irrigation Supply . KlSCOPifer . Kilpatrick Turf Equipment PI J7A f:J7 f:J7J7 J1J7llJ7Pf:J7 J7nJ1 'l'J7J1IIf: A J\1n r£)J\1nJ'I'J£)J\1f: £)17 f:A J j;o ..o' ¥¥. l ~ ~ ~~..., x 0-. :..;a ..: -,0 ..1..... ..' I ',' ~~... ;::: 0'..0:- .... ~~~ t." oi'_ u..a:0~ y , ~ ~, - ~ Z ::d ~::> ..:- ~ .. j ~.: - ,- ~ :&' 9 '- .- 5 'r' :-.! ~ :::'.J '""" !J"j .-0 :z: ~ o ~~ z~ w U ~ ~ .- .... ti= ....0- ó~:;!::; Z W ~ ~ :? ~ to; w~ LLO W ~ a: .- a:u =>~ o ~ ~~ ..... .. -0 -¡ - ~ '. .~ ~ 1/):1: - 0. I- 0 .. ... .. C '-' '-~ " !,'., ~ '::0 '~ -=- .- 0..;, "" 0 ~ ..j :s - ~5 ...... ._"'. t..:i .. ,~ = .::.~ :3 ~ .. : ~:; ~ ...: ¡j o z a: LU o a: 0-,1/):1:-0. 1-0 a:::';~ ::¡ -,' 0'-: >- ~ -' 3! ;:g N '" ......:s: .. ..~ a; g~w~ ;;..) %:...:,.. :!":I: ~ ¿.1,j;:.....J S8~.... :...:~~ * P- .... .. Qu=>G:; ::::>;::) - ~~ _J g c... *....""1- *U'\NL.- 1/)0....10 1-0 . . 0 W >-0: ~~ za: -<0 =>:.: 00 - ~ 0 c--.J ~fiJ ø oj e- ¡::o: ,,- <:> d , zw u: ::~ -<0 ::- ::>a: 00 0 :z: w ..... ~ .'" ':0: U 0< Do l!è z o ï= ~ a: ü en w o - "" <:) ':' 0 ,~-. ~ " ..... : ~ ê. ü ~ I ~ W ~ :=! <:::; !i ~ 0 ~ .... 0 ¢ ~c w "- &: ~ _w ~ >:> la ..... -<- .... ð~ w .... .... ~ 0 Co) w ~ :r u II> ;x;; , ) en w x o aI en w o w ë: U) '" -' o z æ en , I/) -' -' ~ B Q .~ ~-¡ "',J ,~. I~ :8-= I- ~ c:: ;¡;: - ....- <;: ....... III.." ~ ....,-d ~.,> III ~n~ \\ - III :) \ ~..Q 'J <Q co ~-g "III co r, ~ ~~ >- ~g.5·~ CD e 1"0 ,,-' .& <I> :J '""'" 1-.& c:r ~ .:. ^ ..; i uJ .-;:, "" . . .... ....: C'~ ':..J - :;: I- - $ ~ ~ ò u co W ~ ~, ..,-.. .~ ¢ "- Co .... .... -r, .. ~Q ..~ ..¡ o:X: .:;:. ..... ~~ -'"'- ;,: ~ ...::, :4;;::: I=:; :z:. ~ ii' ti ~ oo:a:r:<e OI...JSO u f~ "¡" "- .~, ;.; ~ - .:> I N 0:- J -.:I -.0 .. w ,.... .J: ~ - ;..... ~ .:.J >' ;! :151: \ -, \ :%Ii Ó 0.: ,~6/'V SOS~Sk .B!) ;1 u.; .... -< ~I wi Ci -<I ,¡ I , 'I I il ¡ I I;-{ :t ~ ~I c.:¡' ü51 all Q¡ :1> ¡ ,Ie.. . 0, u1 ..I' LU· m¡ 1:5 ¡ .': '-I . !?: . I~ : ,It Ie.. , ~Il I i =-1 ~I I@ ,.... I~ . CI.' 0:1 0, o ~ W aI -' -' ~ c z < 0: o ... o w I/) ~ ~ il~1 "",' ¡¡:, c.:¡ z ¡j¡1 ~ I .:j:ë! I := ä: c' UJ I :;: !;( ~ ~ ~ I g . -< I ~ or' - -..::.: i zx d z a: w o a:z: o·::¡ CII:I:-CI. I- 0 cr:---::~ ::) ::; ~ ----- o;:c ~ .... "Æ ~~ .... ':;".1 ...... ":- :,,:. :5 -= ...J ... 0:&.: t ~j -' C'-o __'; ~~5 ~~.. ~ _ -.r.'~ .... - .... ~ l'-:' ~?::: ;-;; ~.., ~ LLcr:O::; .-< --:. .... c::;¡ ~ ,- '~ ~ 9 - ~ :;) -' w ~ '-..,: .. ,.., 0:: Ó Z W ." ~ ~ ro :-... W ..... 0: .-.. W LL - W Co a: -J I- a: ~ ::¡ .... 0 '5: ~...... -..;.::> --0 '7 ~? t .". ..... ~~ :: ~. w :s: d:: zo:... w U Õ > ....J:J ~ :¿.. t~ ~ .... 0:> .... r-.. .~ 0 .... ..... .. - 0 ... - ~ ,0 '( ~ . .. ,:.,' ":'L . ~ CII:I:-CI. I- 0 N ~ Co :.s:; .;> .::¡ iJ W .. I:!j. .. .::> ;: .. <..:- :'::a 0 "" u c .' .~ ... ",. ~ ~ :"j U '- 0..;. I * ::! ;§: -' :;, .... .~. -' 3 . .. .. :..... -¡;, .;> <'I '* .......:8: ... IQ i:.c: §'WÒ) Ü%:>o-. :" ~ ..: ~ _ ~ to') ~t.j""'...J co %........ 'iu8ü *:..,¡O::U ...........~ c:. ::,.'\ ::> W B:3g~ .. - .. 1- !'-~ ¡.- * i..t.... ~.J w.. CIIO..JO 1-0 ':DR, 1'- ~ II. ,~ ~o _w cD "- 1-0: 0 ", zw ..: ., <0 ::¡o: 00 ¡ , ! I ...' ! I ~. ì:--~--: I I ~ ! ::;,:.:. s+-1 (.; ~ ;;! c: I ~ I~I~ c: ~ IU -r--¡-'- C) \ I ~ I: ,- I~ I:;. 1\ I I Z k 0 I:::: ¡:: I~ a. ~ u en ::, w c -- ~ " -oJ 0 , ~.. ...J .... <I: ... I- ~ C h .:>.. <=> ~ u .... .... u t .. ... v": ~ I.o.! ;; ::: ð ~ r....;· ,~ ¡- ~ <:. ~ ¡:: ~ ~ - 0 0 ~ß ~ ..... ..... !a ¡¡¡ Q ..... «- ... ::¡J: w .... Om l- i:'! ó (.) W J: W ~ -- --- .:J-; /1 i :::t -t~,~~ >, W I- « o I- Z W C) « I I I I , .'. :: ¡ . , L', .... :-".¡ N 0 W - Z c::> C) Q ii\ <'-I ai ø 0 -. = I ::::- ,> . !Q. 0 '0 :;.~; ~ - :2: iU ! 'v I..J . oC:::I " ..0 v ,W , ê.:J ,En ¡ -- i:L ~ I Q:- ¡ ¡:J . 'CI) i t..:. 'e¡ , h": .-..;. 'z I ..,.. 0:- ~ :~ ~ -' ... ; . . , t·') I .~ ~ 'if ! t,·-, t·" t.... .~ I 1 w I: I- ~ 0 w W I- « t- - 0: ....... (... ~ 0 '-' Ä .'~ 0. W ....., a: -' .::., "- 0 .....: -or Ü ....... :z: ~ 'E .... .. .... ~. Õ t·? ? ::¡: 0 . ;;; w .... r-.. r-.. CD 0 -" ..... 0:> Õ ,::> .. ~ .... ~- ..... ,:., .... .. - 0 ..... :z: ';j ~ :¿ ~ .... --t'. t-:r .. v.. ~ t·? 0 .K Q "" :z: ~ <r ;;:¡ ....... ~ ~ - Z 'I:" ... .,' ..... N ... ..... ~ « ..... ;::) :;::. ~ .:. ..... ;;: ~ ë: <:> -'- ¡",.:. w 0;.: .... ,~ .... .... <:I ,- 0: .' ~ ~ ;:> ... % .0 1 ::> ~ :: .. ~ 0 g CI '-' .... .:z ....1 .... LL ~ l- t.;; æ 0 :z: w ~ 9 ~ 0 ..J c.: <:: .... ...J '= :.:: I- -' ;:ï: w ~ ..... ~ ~ m t..' ~ 1.0.' U % ....s .... .. w « d:. ~ ~- ¡,;~ '", >- .... ..... !:!! :z: I- J: :ä <:: <r 15 :x: ....... -.;; <= '"'- Si ..... Z ü ... "" -G :a a... .... -0 C ... a: :;) 0. C) ", z iij "- . CD :'4\ -........ !!2 ~ ...., .. N N ~ « " a: ~ ~ ; ;::. l~OS~SCle!) '::"""II ' '-' / THE HOME DEPOT 283 5880 OKEECHOBEE ROAD fT. PIERCE fL 34947 STORE MANAGER RICH MALITS (561)489-3688 0283 00002 15319 11/26/01 SALE 61 827 08:13 ~~ ! ..6l þt. C \ I ',~ ,'.. C',, ~~~, ~6 ,~~~ ® 035781010436 9/64BLOXDR 035781010436 9/64BLOXDR 035781010436 9/646LOXOR 035781010436 9/646LOXDR 028877364964 PHILIPS 61 028877364964 PHILIPS 61 SUBTOTAL NO TAX TAX EXEMPT 10# 660201773753C TOTAL XXXXXXXXXXXX5397 VISA/MC AUTH CODE 049860/7021342 2.34 2.34 2.34 2.34 3.97 '3.97 17.30 0.00 $17 . 30 17.30 TA 'I \1 "Ill' I \\111 I 'I" \11\1 '" \ 'II \ I 'I" \I \1\\\1\1\1' II' 0283 02 15319 11/26/01 4461 RECEIPT REQUIRED fOR REfUND APPlV TODAV PART TIME JOBS! ~ ~-877-WORK-4-HD ~ "wi f Q~O ~~ o ':V'Ø D0 o \w '.....I . -- - --. - .- ,-'. . -- - ... .... INVOICE MaN ruE WED THU FRI SAT 000000 WE'RE HERE TO HELP YOU BUILD A BETïER WA'fTM ~~ ucrn NQV 2 B 20ðf o AM 0 DELIVER o PM _ 0 PICK-UP III!IB ~B AVENUE A FOOT PIERCE FL 34950 (561) 461-5<;'50 T\·¡mt:: YOU! lOADED" CHECKED BY HELP ON JOB DYES DNO OEUVERED BY DATE DELIVERED ~ ASH SALE PIERCE YARD Bl~RD CO C\~tISSIONERS SOLD ST LUCIE COUNTY TO: '2300 VIRGINIA 'I\.¡ENUE F0\i:1 PIERCE, FL 34Q82 77~'>4621499 SHIP TO: -- ,----, !\ '. :~-, I.~ ( '. ...~... ~-, \ ii' i ¡ ¡ L'-l (~!thcd Zo2;:! by ~·m:PA.1:;;TMENT AA"IE AND "SI~lIJRE Cus10mer Code Sequence No. Date Delivered OOARDCC ,.- Reference Number Customer Order Number Job Number Estimate Number Salesman ... '}ISA t::AAEN VHNOCRwAL v ITEM NUMBER DESCRIPTION UNITS PRICE I UNIT EXTENSI< 2~) ThEA-lED 10' 2'00.000 O.760EtF 152.c. I 7 /1)- fPP * Th9 go ~ arl':3/or ser ices as ¡lied hQrec!1 e been re eived in the d quality $ aled. 'fb --- ---- ~~ 152..00 TAX % .-::00 TA:l( AMOUNT IMPORTANT: SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR TERMS, CONDITIONS & ANANCE CHARGES. SUB-TOTAL 0.00 ._L)- ¿.;.,../ REC'D,BY /p" c~¿~· /~::;?~'£-- tt ./ /' Ai\\ endered: 151.00"'(''hanqe: 0.00 DATI; 1 688314'~"-2 PG ~ '. '--' ......, ----- ---- -- -- ---.-._- ~ --- ------ ------- ~----_._-_._- ------~~------ ---- --. ----.-- RECIO NOV 2 92001 ......... INVOICE YeN 11Æ WEO THU FRI SAT DDDDDD ~.. ~~. WE'REHERETOHELPYOU BUILD A BETTER WA)'TW !JUhI~"DA YARDS: FORT PIERCE . STUART . VERO BEACH COCOA . MELBOURNE TRUSS PLANTS: MELBOURNE . FORT PIERCE ....... LOADED" CHECKED IY HELP ON JOII DYES o ND OIUVERID IY DATI! Df.UYERI!D o - 0 DELIVER 0-_ 0 PICK-UP -- 308 AVENUE A FæT PIERCE FL 34950 (~061) 461-5950 THANK YOU! ~ ~ ÐOARI) CO COMMISSIONERS SOLD ST L.l.I:IE COUNTY TO: 2300 VIRGINIA AtJENlE FLRT PIERCE, FL 34982 77"'"..A.t!21499 SHIP TO: by~illill~ REWIRE Au'thoî-ized 6 0 Date Delivered ~ cade Sequence No. ransaetion Store 08le No. S'man. 606 -- Customer Order Number Job Number Estimate Number Salesman 0 VISA PAlL GAGNON QUm, SHPD. DESCRIPTION UNITS PRICE I UNIT EXTENSII 120.000 O.38OELF 45.': 2.000 1.79OEACH 3.~ 1.000 2. 430EACH 2.- 1.000 4. ~.JOÐ.lJX 4. S 10 4 PRESSURE TREATED 12' 2 ~2 PHIL ISO-TEMP POWER BIT 1 A 8-10 SLOT ISO-TEMP POWER BIT 1 6D GALV liD CO~ NAILS 5~ (f"O %) . rb-t~/) , -.,;". r '. ..\J...- ":"" ... :.~"... Jr -r ~ SUB-T:~LS61 t~:;;\ ~~~, / AIrt t.endered: 68B4O'Z"+2 " PG It ---- - -------.__..._-----~------ ~-- .------ ------ ------ ----... --- ----- ----- ---------_.-.-~_._-------~-- - -"--- - '-' ~ Tt-._ . ...,.'.1:. DEPOT 283 5880 OKEECH08EE ROAD fT.PIERCE fL 34947 STORE M~AGER RICH MALITS (561)489-3688 0283 00003 13437 11/28/01 SALE 61 410 01:05 PM lZi1~~ 8> ~~ ~~ Q ~\~ $448.00 0 d ~- 448.00 T A c;:Y i Ilmllllllll~llllmllll~IIIIII~II~!1111 rj 0283 03 13437 11/28/01 1267 es RECEIPT REOUIREO fOR REf UNO APPLV TODAV PART TIME J08S! Ç{¿. ~ 1-877-WORK-4~HD r. Q¡1PP2 Vo-H}£- ~.5 CWd 184938 2X4-12PTPR ~~ 100.000 . $4.48 . ': 448.00 NO TAX '- 0.00 TAX EXEMPT 10# 6602D1773753C TOTAL XXXXXXXXXXXX5298 VISA/MC AUTH CODE 071615/5030062 ---- / I Þ¡,' 5- J ; S }-(!)V --I-- A e. ;-; e c/o c{: ~wR- "'" v OJ I.Q (II n ... c 0 rJ ~ - 0 ¡¡: ... m ::!' z o o N (X) CN I (11 (0 ....¡ ~ CN ('") c: '" '* o 3 C\I ... ('") o "'C -< r >'" ....'" ....n ,...'" <- .... .......... o 0'" "'>'" 1<0 -co c: ............. ";"~~ ~.....o "'........ "".....0 . ""'" ...", , '" :x........ eo'" ,.,c: U'>Z .~e (() (X o ... o ... o o o 01 01 ... W N I.... ~~n - :Þ n r- ~ r- - --- - o N_ co ... o- w- o co_ ... w_ .... ... ...- ,- N- O' , 0- ... 0= :'l .þ- - - - -I 0 < " -I :Þ » c;;¡ -< > s: r- m Z (") .... .... ::I: m » = 3: :J] ~ C> m C/) 0 'T1 » r- r- S m :J] (") ::I: » Z C - C/) m m 1(0 Z C/) 0 0 m "'n :J] 0 < ~ - n en en n ,,;¡r .... = :D ,'m" Q m 0 7'''' n c (") c: "iiîi" :00: .... 3: c: m ~::::~:;::: m CI ~:\): = en " n -I ñ CO :¡I:: = .þ. :Þ 0 :00: to z = w c S ." \~\~it¡¡~: c CO ;¡; :Þ '.::::':':::' m m .... :.:.:.:.:.:.: .... :J] !!' ::::::~~::: C ... .:::.:~';.:. œ 3! ... m ... ~.:.:-:.::': Ñ 0 ,Ii " (") en 0 ñ Ñ 0 :00: ~ Q m C Q 0 ...',........ C ::.:ú.·.·: ... ....:::;.=::. c: "tJ :~ ~ ~ m ::Þ .... U'> > ,... .... ~~ X~ g .....x U'> :xx ..... x.... 0 S~ ~ ~ ex "" '" ....x .... o~ .... "'~ .....>< ...-c 1"'1;:10 wCJI c n'" ~g 'II: ~~ .....N Ø't rl""l .... ... z ......,<-40%>-4 C......CNCS W(l)-40 0_ N»...........c: w.......,..........>z c.JS ......x.... Nn ... .... ... Co> n ~ ... ... ... .þ ...co ...... . >00 00 o ... oD .... ... .., .... ... OCD 00 00 o co ..... oD .., O'.... ::-.,..; '- 0'" CD ... .. .... ...N ..,O' , ~S .:v $ ~r ... ,.. rl- ... en - ,.. .. 0 z ... .0- n ..... ... ... CI en CI ..... ..... = »- »- ... ... >< <I> <I> <I> .þ. .þ. .þ. .þ. .þ. <I> .þ. en ?> 0 (» 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "~,, ,,:xl', 'Ö: J1'h ;1 "æ, ~ ·N' iul "TI "TI 0 r :c -I " m :c n m N ¡; W .þ. (() 01 o = S m .... m ~ J] C) (") N en ::I: :00: :Þ = ""- Z en - C en ên - en C/) ".. m n = :Þ en ... U'> "" ..... co ~ ¡'g-t .... oJ: ~~'" >n ~ š:I "'~I.,¡ ~ ....:1 ç~ '1\ ""i; ~ ....,C ~~ '1\ ~ ~" U;ç:O O' n-t ~.... ... ... :g ""N .:..~IZ) ~~W co.... =-- C;¡' tIICD CD~ ",:T C OCD ~ ~, a: _I!J o;?; - (').... C co .. tII ....-- - 03 ::r 3;;' C;¡' CD.... ~æ a. ~ .0 - C ~ Q :> ... .... ;; ... ¡¡¡ Ñ '" g, en Ñ c c ... n 0 0 , < '- n en 0 0 a 3 ~ ~ ¡¡ Z , -< -I j¡ z r õ 3 , . C N n X m "f" ... N iJ -I r0- C ~ m C") Q c: 2 -I -< 1:10 Q n C") (I) -I r0- C ~ m C") Q c: 2 -I :i-< ~ " ,. o , . - ûì l ~ 2 " .þ g en . N N - ~ en 111-1 :.:: men ::s¡;;' CDc:I :::1:::1 g...c ""III rn-+ 3CD= c: CDC) a-l c:rm <- 1115: ::c- c:I::r 3CD CD3 eCD CD"" "CI" c:I::r -~ C;e: =rn ¡¡¡'CD _m CD:::I "'c:a. <rn !!!..CD -.... c:a.< m-' ~.g c:len =='''CI ... 5' - CD c:a. c:r CD Õ ~ -I ::r ¡¡¡. cr CD " o 3 CD en III = :Þ CCI ... CD CD 3 CD = - c: "CI o = "CI III -< 3 CD = - ,~ ,- r;¡ -I ¡"ï c:J :::~:5 x ::I '-' "... f'õj fT1 ~;2 ~ ~ ~ -I ::D~ ~~ ~ ~~ :~: ~ ~~ .......;.:, .~~ ;~ -::!-·r.::~'='Z="--t c-; ~ ~ :~ ~:J a 0(> ~..J:Þ:I>!-o'o---t ~ c...J··....r-.J:!>z c...J::3: -....JX-I ¡'~,) .:;. ij.; ~~ ~~ ......¡ >< = ><. ... ~. ..;.~ ......... .,::-, ;:", ('\1 -;' . :!:>- .::' ,=: -"-' ___1 D ::.<. .... .... .=. :0 :§:,~; '-' en :ö ~J ..... ,:...1 Ij "'n01en 0(X .... JJ(X O -10(1; "00 mA""' :cm(X nmW mn"TI . J:-I "TIO" rUJ- mm wm:C .þ.:cn ~Om -.J en "tJ m (") 5> r- en m :J] < - (") m C/) (") C C/) -I o S m :J] » c:;) :J] m m S m Z -I - <D 3 '" ~ <J' <D ':J" <D ë: 5 S- CD tII Õ ñì Q ." ..... -4 a. :I: OJ -< m '" -4 0 m :;¡ :D ~ s: g> C/) 5' :to I!J "t1 S- O iJ :Þ ,.. (ij' ~ ¡:; :Þ !!' :to '" ñì UJ <D ,.. 3 m CD -I ~ 0 Õ -I :;- :I: m '" -4 U'I <D ;¡¡ ;: JJeniJ C1> OJ ::T ~_ ro 0 C1> '" :J ~ ~ ~ (II ~ ~ ~ 01 :J 01 ... 0- ~~ O(() W 01 ():) ():) -- "" ~ =' :z: c:> c::: t:..:I -3 N (:) (:) -- L/j j~ ¡-r¡ o ~I U1 c.o " ~ W iJ OJ u:J (II s. ... '-' :-..; Q:;! r~j z o .0- :~ -t:J .-, èõ -..þ-. ...o(...! er- ...~ '::. ~ (0 :- .., '-I.!-_..) --"'J-. '~ ::-... . I .~'--" '-" "-tI REC19NDV 2 92 aOf ~- FROM: CAS H SEWELL HARDWARE CO., INC FT. PIERCE STORE 202 SOUTH 5TH STREET FT. PIERCE, FL 34950 I N V 0 ¡" C E COUNTER BILLING SOLD TO: 5T LUCIE COUNTY COMMISNS ATTN:RCCTS PAYRBLE 2300 VIRGINIA AVE FT PIERCE, FL 34982-5698 SHIP TO: (SAME> JRDER NO INVOICE NO ORDER DATE INVOICE DRTE CUSTOMER CUSTOMER P.O. NO. ---.----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7:41AM IJse'r'36 SLSt>IN .------------------------------------------------------.-------------.-------------. ·88231 137981 11/28/01 11/28/01 760722 VISR/PRRRETT 0;.- -J -------------------------------------------.-------------------------------------- ïERMS SHIP VIR/ROUTING DATE REQUESTED SHIPPED LOC TA1-ŒN B\ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :ASH/CHG =~=~===========:=====~======~==================================================== SEWELL PI CI';UP 11/2&/01 5 E00'5 ~ART NUMBER QTY ORC HIM DESCRIPTION QTY SHP QTY BKO PRICE SHIP UNITS U/M f:"4MOUNT DISU~ .----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INVOICE RMOUNT 0 2.70 EA 1 E-. ,::;:121 ill '" 12 EA ~I. i-' ....!. .::. ø . B& EA . 88 .-,.-, c:ø CCo . '::''-::J 2Ø ~~. IvlIM3710C Ó EA 6 ADHESIVE 10.3 OZ CART 1 EA 1 GRADE DUCT TAPE 2X60 ~DS 1 EA 1 PACi-',AGING TAPE CLEAR 2" X55YD LEEF2633 CONSTR UTCUT100SH CONTR. AMOUNT PAID BY CREDIT CARD PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE BELOW AVAILABLE IF PAID 2~ 10TH PROX NET 30 ' OiJr 7 -;J. / ~ ~ '5 G;1. ~fY-~~ ry 00 rhe goods and/or services as billed hereon have been received in the quantity and quality slated, DISC. SHOWN BY TERMS P. O. #.. -- lNC - ~Ra~;¡' Y~M- (r!~J ~) x~~~ RECEIVED BV: '. FROM: CAS H SEWELL HARDWARE CO., FT. PIERCE STORE 202 SOUTH 5TH STREET FT. PIERCE, FL 34950 ...., ~-". NEC'D DEe ~ 7/J ¿?{ fS, ()V 03 Zoot Of)/~ raft)- b5~()/)t) I N V.O I f1'{ I~tJ/-7Æ/I)-ðLffo(}l?o" 7€~tR 'r.~1krNG The goods and/or services as billed . hereon have been received in the t ~ qyantity and quality.. stated. Iy tP ð { . 11./ (fof-'/:/ lIP' 55// ~o,. I' SOLD TO: P. O. 4t: INC - SHIP TO: ST LUC I E COUNTY COÍ'iM I SNS ~ AT TN : ACCTS PAYABLE SignA..! ~ . ~M (SAME) 2300 VIRGINIA AVE FT PIERCE, FL 34982-5698 ~ , '-" '3:21AM '.IseY'36 --------------------------------------------.--------------------------.---------- RDER NO INVOICE NO ORDER DATE INVOICE DATE CUSTOMER CUSTOMER P.O. NO. ~?L~:;Mr.¡ ----------------------------------.-.-------------------------------.--------------..--. '305&2 140334 11/30.01 11/30/Ø1 760722 VISA/DONGHIA ~ -......-----.--------------------------.--.-------.---------.--- ---------------------..--. ERt'iS SHIP VIA/ROUTING Dr~TE REQUESTED SH I P¡:'ED LOC H"1I'<Er·j ;\'¡' -----------------------------------------------.------------.-----.----------------- ASH/CHG SEWELL PI C!-"Ij¡:.I 1:/3121/01 5 E~:::Ø5 ~===~========================~============~====~=========================~===== ART NUMBER QTY ORD H;r'1 DESCRH·'TION QTY SHP QTY B:{O ¡:':(ICE SHIP L.:t~ITS· U /ì-,'¡ j~MOU(,i ì DI·;:'Ci': ----.--.-----------------------------------------------------------------·---·-__________..ø._... '-.UF7e.¡ó.L 1 EA 1 0 ::.2. Q~ 1 EA -2~:. !.?o1 FIBER.GLASS ï¡:',PE 1/2X100 AMS3i4J 2.50 PV 2. ~5Ø ø .::. -r-=:-' ç.. ¡-,~ e... t·:,:· -- E.LADE 2Pr~ JIGSAW .... II 1'. TPI BIMETAL. .,:, DUB~il~ i :~ø¡z, 4 EA 4, ø 1.73 [~-1 ~t-1.';;2 '-'; D AU',AI_INE BATTER"',' 1 PI"; RBCTSQo0 1 PI>; 1 ø 6.89 PK £.. f)'~1 - BLADE BOSCH ASSORTMENT 5BLADES RBCT123X 5 E¡:¡ c::- 0 1. as E.:I t'", ·-,e ...J :>..C,,-' - BLADE PROGRESSOR 4" PROGRESSIVE TEET 1 Ph ,.WC-¡ 234 x ~ EA ~. 0 1. 7~; EA ~ ,/". ~ Co ~. ~C:' BLADE PROGRESSOR 4 1/2" PROGRESS I ','E RBCT2A5XF -. EA .-, ø 2.61 EA C' .-,-._____ .::. Co ....... c.c.. BLADE PROGRESSOR '" 1 /.4" PROGRESSIVE oJ KRY934øe '::- EA ~. 0 3.08 EA -,. .;. 1 b "- c. INVERTED SPRAY ORANGE FLUORES 120Z APE492A 2 EA 2 0 1. 19 EA 2.38- INSERT BIT PHILLIPS #2 2 3/4"OAL APE492B '::- EA 2 ø 1. 44 Er4 2.88........ "- INSERT BIT PHILLIPS #.-, - 1/2"OAL c. ..:. APE4t)2 2 EA ¿ 0 .99 EA 1.98- INSERT BIT PHILLIPS tt-' 1 15/16"OAL .::. FOU105 1 EA 1 ø SCREWDRIVER 6-IN-l PRIVATE LABELED INVOICE AMOUNT ~J- ....-::::::::: LEASE SEE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON REVERSE SIDE, EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. \\t~ tiQ'J '¿ 1 'l.~VOlaf Ji~ 8 1 962 ~ 434 North 7th Street · Fort Pierce. FL 34950 (561J 461-6845 · (561J 562-6846 · (561J 283-6366 Okeechobee (863) 763-4991 · Fax (561) 468-0204 Florida State License Numbers FIE 510858000295 System 510858000495 ~ 1'146 ~œ; 24 HOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE Fire E><tinguishers . Automatic Fire Suppression Systems' Recharging' Inspecting. Testing' Repairing· Installation Emergency Lighting' Maintenance· Batteries' Light Bulbs. Extinguisher Cabinets· Scuba Tanks Tested. Tumbled & V.I.P.S. Fire Hose/Fittings. Signs' First Aid Kits' Co. Gas for Beversges . Training Seminars BILL TO NAME ADDRESS CITY/ST/ZIP ATTN PHONE ( ) BC SHIP TO/JOB SITE. CC NAME~' tuC;/é. ~ !..£.r!;u'(2..6 f;&w,'C/3 ADDRESS ó2M-~ _ Útt'Z.:;//"¡ riq. I4cJ6 . CITY/ST/ZIP ft· I£t'l.d:. ¡:/ri. ~t.f9 S"s. AnN: dAd fJA./VIt -f¡:'£1L PHONE [ ) JJ to;;..... L c¡ L{ '-I ,I INVOICE SIGNED BY fJ/;/-:.. - '::I' /: SEA TECh ROUTE COD, TERMS I ~~ /F/Í- '¡,'¡,"~ /-r~ TIO CASH I CHECK \ VISA I MASTERCARD\ t. / (I AJTHORIZED BY (PRINTì :J ANNUAl :J SEMI ANNUAe :J SERVICE CAee :J RENT AI.S DTY PURCHASE ORDER' TRK' I, INVOICE DATE !I TYPE ANL MAIN, NEW HTI.P HTHP 6 YR MT RECH SIZE BRAND elST PR UNITPR AMOUNT DRY CHEM ABC· BC . PK DRY CHEM ABC· BC . PK DRY CHEM ABC· BC - PK CARBON DIOXIDE CARBON DIOXIDE CONDUCTIVITY TEST HALON 1211. 1301 OR FE36 WATER PRESSURE CLASS K VALVE STEM SHE.L NECK O·RING . /"\ I rlJtJi i.J,...,<:.~ roi4bIN~/- ILF-..L'/ L A'JTC)MATIC FlF.E SUPPRESSION SYSTEM FUSIBLE LINK HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL HOURLY LABOR SERVICE FEE . 1/){ <Ç.; 1í rt J.., t07' n , I ¿J, 1./ t'; ~3 R.F) I)Q t:n ~ nn QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS / SAFETY RECOMMEN!?ATIONS , ., I .kL ~LFMCPRR ".~ ~v~_·> -CT";I' ----- --........ hereon bve be;"n received in t e ~ - ) ~ua¡&r ð,nj :,u~W ~a'~i /ÌA ... /} ÍflO (í , t Lf A-- J UY/; 61{" --./ ~ ,~ , ~^ - iNC -- ( rd ' \'¡'vv' / . ~ ~--:J' - - .......... ----- " SUB TOTAL C~~ SALES TAX GRANO" _~ OÇ"') TOTAL IF ~~::J J.R..... My Ace,,,'" clays past ~ue will inCur rea_ _ion antV« attomoy...., ServìceCharge: '.1/2% pef month, 18%. per annum will bechargedonallpastdueacccunts. IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OR NON-REnJRN OF CARBONIC GAS CYLINDERS. THE PURCHASER AGREES TO PAY $150 UPON DEMAND, Thank Y'OU lor this order, your business I. aøpreciated. Payment Due Upon Completion EQUIPMENT SERVICES. INC. 11.~~ ~~ ~ \\.~~ ~ 434 North 7th Street · Fort Pierce. FL 34950 (561) 461-6845 · (561) 562·6846 . (561) 283-6366 Okeechobee (863) 763-4991 . Fax (561) 468-0204 Florida State License Numbers FIE 510858000295 System 510858000495 , INVOI-..l N~ 81964 ~" , ~ 1~46 ~ŒJ 24 HOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE Fire Extinguishers. Automatic Fire Suppression Systems. Recharging· Inspecting. Testing. Repairing. Installation Emergency Lighting. Maintenance· Batterias . Light Bulbs· Extinguisher Cabinets. Scuba Tanks Tested. Tumbled & V,I.P.S. Fira Hose/Fittings . Signs. First Aid Kits. Co, Gas for Bevarages . Training Seminars BILL TO BC NAME ADDRESS CITY/STIZIP ATTN SHIP TO/JOB SITE. !y.. _ CC NAME M - Lu.Ct;; Wuß J.é..tbufl,f 5úWiCÆ.; ADDRESS 8;?OO (Jt1.. áí I\j rÏ1 IÎrJ Ii. , CITY/ST/ZIP R .l1llLC.~ ¡:::£4. ATTN Jw-.K PI1I V#fÆlf1. PHONE ( ) PHONE ( ) %:1-¡Cjj.{ i? ~ ~./£. I JfJB AUTHORIZED BY (PRINT} INVOICE SIGNED BY,...(' "7,. '-'U Tn.. . À :J ANNUAL ~URCHA$E ORDER' SEA. TECH ROUTE I C,O,D, TERMS !~~ ~ NEXT T~ TIO TRK.! INVOICE DATE Dl.'E :J SEMI ANNUAL w{f ~ i CASH I CHECK I VISA MASTERCAR01 (iæl,,-~-o( :¡ SERVICE CAll :J RENTALS DTY TYPE ANL MAIN NEW HTLP HrHP 6YRMT RECH SiZE BRAND LIST PR UNIT PR AMDWNT DRY CHEM ABC· BC . PK I DRY CHEM ABC· BC· PK DRY CHEM ABC· BC . PK CARBON DIOXIDE CARBON DIOXIDE CONDUCTIVITY TEST HALON 1211, 1301 OR FE36 WATER PRESSURE CLASS K VALVE STEM SHELL NECK,O.RING .. I , hf't..f£, Hò5t Ü4J'.)/A/.é- t fLt.c. ... :/ rt't9l 7f: ':11., .I ~~3 &') J,.... ·~r') 'Hr¿v( AVTOMATlC AF.E SUPPRESSION SYSTEM FUSIBLE LINK HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL HOURLY LABOR SERVICE FEE f)('L ~-"'- J QTY MATERIAL DESCRIPTI~ETY REC~ENDATION~ FLFMCPRR ~ nn " . ~ I I ne ~oo;.s a;¡o, Or serVices as DI, e. h"rr"n how" h.."n . I in th /' - / qUãp,ity AJ~ Cl.,ualilY ~t~ , ~ ~'" /}'..,.." / ~fì I' ) ( SI71 / 6I~ h- ¿ <;>( {.!:!:-: '../ '!Nt! "'" ...... ..... /( (Y... V"- ./ .... -Q.. ~ ~ ~ C ,;) ...... --- SUB TOTAL 6"~) ~O , SALES TAX - ...- IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OR NON-RE'TURN OF CARBONIC GAS CYLINDERS. THE PURCHASER AGREES TO PAY $150 UPON DEMAND. GRANO . ~~3 90 Thank you for this order, )'Our business is awrlCilted. TOTAL """ Accounc days past cIue,.;a n:ur _bioi cdlection ondIor &nomoy fees, Service Charge= 1-1I2%.permonth, 18% per annum will be cnarged on .1 pest due accounts. Payment Due Upon Completion ~.I W~,~~~_ __.~~ ~.;J..)...J...J." D.J;S PORTABLE T~~ETS 6412 Oleander Ave FT PIERCE, FL. 34982 1-561-595-1475 [.------'-....-..-..'..'. 81LL TO: i.ê¡,\IJ'e Services··' '.--- 2300 Vi¡¡inl Ave Fort Pierce. Fl34982 1-561·"" otIice .~ (Ä'Ä /l:~ I~ ,. f' ^ 1'1 l~~1·-¡ ~ QUANTrTY -_...".........~.- DESCRIPTION '~I ,._'-I...I.....J' p,o, NUMBER P2110856 ~ Amisteld project 25.00 per day per uoilll unlts@15.00 -16HO 12/06101-12110101 6 uniU letlII15.00 per dly =-90,00 x's ~ days 12111/01-12/16/01 .. : JESUS LOVES YOU ""Al:J~ t:Jl ...",¡ Invoice 1"-·- DATE -- I" -INVOICË'-··l ...____...._. _~,l.___._...._. .1 11212002 45"-" ...._....... --..."....-.... ._...~ -.......".........-............-.-..-., TERMS PROJECT Due on receipt RATE AMOUNT 165.00 66O,00T 90.00 0.00 4~O.OOT 0.00 ~u.."..~,_._.~·..._. I TOTAL __.......__.______...l____.. I I I $1.11000 ~ _c..v -=.~ ")!,- .':'--(>0,,": ;\. ----- ~ '-' AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO.-º-3-A DA7E: Janu81y 22,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasina Department Michael Rath, Purchasina Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-019, Cortez Blvd. at 29th Street Culvert Replacement _ BACKGROUND: On December 28, 2001, bids were opened for Cortez Blvd. at 29th Street Culvert Replacement. Seven hundred fifty-eight (758) vendors were notified, six (6) bid documents were distributed and three (3) bids were received. The Public Works Department has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Lucas Marine Construction, Inc. (see attached memorandum). Per FY02 Public Works CIP (Capital Improvement Plan), funds are available in the amount of $200,000 for the NSLRWCD Canal 1 02 & Selvitz culvert replacement project. Staff is recommending that funds in the amount of$39,915 be reallocated toward the South 29 St /Cortez Ave culvert replacement project and that the NSLRWCD Canal 1 02 culvert project be funded in the next fiscal year 2002-2003. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in 101003-41131-563000-43016 Transportation Trust /Local Option Culvert and will be made available in 316001-41131-563000-43016 Transportation Trust Capital/Local Option Culvert from 316001-41131-563000-43029. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-019 for Cortez Blvd. at 29th Street Culvert Replacement to the low bidder, Lucas Marine Construction, Inc., in the amount of $126,650 for a total project budget of $144,315 and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. Staff also recommends re-allocating funds in the amount of $39,915 from the NSLRWCD Canal 1 02 & Selvitz culvert project toward the South 29th Street at Cortez Avenue culvert replacement project; the NSLRWCD Canal 1 02 & Selvitz project to be funded in the FY2002-03. COMMISSION ACTION: E: [2J APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney:(X) /"""': / ..... ~;?:;( Coordination/Si Mgt. & Budget (X) U!) Purchasing Mgr.:(X) ."¡ ;,,0 Originating Dept:: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eff,1/97 " DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM .' i~ -- 02-007 -".. To: Michael Rath - Purchasing Manager From: Michael Powley, P.E. - Capital Projects Engineer /Wp " , Via: Barbara Meinhardt - Department Revenue Coordinator ~ '" Date: January 8, 2002 _~~~j~~: _" . _ u u ~\^I~r~ _?~ 5~?~~~ _ ~?~~~~~~~_ ~ .~~.~. ~~r~~~ ,~~~_~,~_ Replacement (02-019) ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~;~ ~~; ~~ ;~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~;;~;; ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~;~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~; ;;; ~~~~ ~;~~; ~~ ~~;; i ~~ ;~;~~~I~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~;; ~;~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ This project will replace the existing deteriorated steel pipe culvert with reinforced concrete pipe and construct two concrete headwa lis , as well as other miscellaneous roadway improvements. On December 28, 2001 bids for this project were opened in the Purchasing office. We have reviewed the three bids received. The high bid had a mathematical error but this did not affect the outcome.. Based on our review of the bids, we recommend award of the contract to the low bidder, Lucas Marine Construction, Inc. in the amount of $126,650. The following budget is established for the project: Construction: Testing: Reserves: TOTAL: $126,650.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 12.665.00 $144,315.00 Funds are available in Fund No. 101003-41131-563000-43016 - Transportation Trust (Local Option Culvert) and will be made available in 316001-41131-563000-43018 - Transportation Capital (Local Option Culvert). Funds will be transferred from the NSLRWCD Canal 102 and Selvitz Road Culvert Replacement in the amount of $39,915 which will be replaced in the 2002/03 Capital Improvement Project's budget. attachments: Bid Summary Spreadsheet Copy wI Attachment); Chester Belcher - Project Manager . ~. } -\ .... II) e .... U) .c .... en N oð "CI ... ca > .!! ~ .- o g m~ .. N N II) Ii t=~ o 8 Oc!! Qj E ¡:: _.!õ ororo Q)QJ:; .~ c e:2o c.. CD () i~1 u co c "C :I ß 8 o "C ....11. ggg88088g88ggg~ggggg Qgggg~gggggg~g~ggggg ~:~~~~~~~~â~~~~~~~~~ "'EI'}""M"""'('I')~~.....Lt)"'''N''''''' cn-"" ...... .... .... N ØI ~ ØI ØI .... .... ~ :; III E ¡ = u 8ggggoggggggg8~gg8 ciciòcidMoo2ddcicio~cidd ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~ *...øtß-VC"")M-ER-6I9-...NM. .. ...... ... 00 00 ~~ ... ... _ co C .. :J ;t .. ~ ~~ ....11. ggggggggg ci ci ci ci ci ~. ci ci ci OCDOOO coo lO~oqo CQl()Q ...:.....C").......rtSai...C"i....¡ ..........f&... "'UJ. CI CI ci CI II) ...: C'I .... .... 88 gg '" 0 ~g ... gggggggg8 g~gggg:ggg o "'''''o "".-;:t"'C"> ~t:ig$~" ..... c o .. c .c o ... 000000000000000 oooooooooooo~oo gggg§~~~ª~~§~~~ ~Ul~~CÕaj"M.";aiÑ ..... ................ ER-ut-vt-C'\I" ... 8g ci Ò 00 .. ... ",'" ... 00 00 00 "" "" ....N ... ... ~ ~ :J å: ~ 11 ....å: 00000000000000 00000000000000 gggggg~~~~gg~~ It)ONCOIO co,.... C'\I (5_TO)C)'t"" tD~£i...~f!f:;;~~~~~~':!- ... .. tit- CI CI ci II) II) iii C'I .... .... 8g u10 '" .... 0... ui~ ... ... ggg8 coco ~~~~ tilt .. fi ... ~ 8 c "C :JQ. 888 ci ci ci ",,00 ""0'" ,zjÑÑ ... ...... ... g2¡gggggg ci "¡":ci0S!0 om~~:!_~~~ :....................;;. ... ... 0000 ooce ggg~ ca~COT"'" tIt"'¡ai ... ... ..... o ..- CD C) m a.. ;1 I ...... . , en 0::: en W't"" Z= O' _N en= I- enO Z :Em W ::E. :IE W 01- 0 OW ~ ~~ ...J a- zen W ::Jz 0::: 00 ~ 0- 0::: ~5 w ~ ::E o::J ::J a- 0:::£0 0 = ~~ tü = 0 N m W @) 0:: I- 't"" en = :J: Q l- N en N a; @) N 0:: 0 W 0:: m ~C) :E wZ W ...J- 0 ::JO:: W ottl 0 mz .. N- o wC) W I-ffi Z ~¡ W a- oa- 0 Q = Q C! C! = = = cv) 0 I.t) = co cø I.t) oo;t m cø- r-: cñ N N en 't"" 't"" 't"" 4ß- 4ß- ~ Ó 0 z z - - z - I- 0 en - z I- en 0 0 0:: ::) 0 0 0:: W 0 I- Z Z en 0 æ w Z Z > 0 en ~ 0 ::E w ~ I- Z.... ...J - LI. 0 - 0:: - I ::J ~c .... m ::E~ Zu.. :IE~ o<{ enO enz 0...: ~CI) z<c t;!i OW :t:1- ::J~ OZ ::J::::J ...J% .,:5 oti; u GO cø It) ..... C") 1:3 W I- ::::J fD ~. æ c t; W ¡¡: ë ¡:: CI) ë ° I- Z Z w CI) W > W ::E ¡¡¡ ! ::::J (,) (,) W E 0 0:: 0 ::E c tf) u C C ..: 0 ãi ãi III (,) - III u.. u.. u.. "0 0 0 0 C III 0:: 0:: 0:: E W W W m fD fD fD "0 ::E ::E ::E ... ::::J ::::J ::::J c Z Z Z .. \w AGENDA REQUEST ~M NO._Ç-3-B DATE: Jam~ary 22,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Michael Rath. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise an Invitation to Bid for Library Book Rental Plan Services. BACKGROUND: The current contract with Baker & Taylor, Inc., expires March 25, 2002. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise an Invitation to Bid for Library Book Rental Plan Services. COMMISSION ACTION: CE: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ug Anderson County Administrator County Attorney:(X) ,"'1 ,.,..,-.- \,'.--:( L .' (~ Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.:(X ~ Other: Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Other: Elf. 1/97 - \.,..r 'iIIIf AGENDA REQUEST IT~ NO. C-3-C DATE: January 22, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PURCHASING PRESENTED BY: MICHAEL RATH SUBJECT: Bid Waiver and permission to purchase twelve (12) demonstrator model Automatic External Defibrillators BACKGROUND: The purchase of Automatic External Defibrillators will enable the County to provide emergency assistance to members of the public and employees who experience sudden cardiac arrest. County employees will receive training in the proper use of the units prior to their use. These units were factory demonstrators and have been reduced in price from $2952 each to $1890 each, including a full factory warranty. This expenditure will require the approval of the attached Budget Amendment No. 02- 114 and Equipment Request No. 02-177. FUNDS AVAILABLE: See attached Budget Amendment No. 02-114 and Equipment Request No. 02-177. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Bid Waiver, authorization for the purchase of twelve (12) Automatic External Defibrillators in the total amount of $22,680 from Safety Products, Inc., and the approval of Budget Amendment No. 02-114 and Equipment Request No. 02-177. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: E: County Attorney. (X) ~~ Mgt. & Budget (X) Purchasing Mgr.:(X) p~ Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (Check fi:>r Copy only, if Applicable) Eff.1/97 · t BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMS FOR RISK MANAGEMENT PREPARED DATE: 01/14/02 AGENDA DATE: 01/22/02 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT TO: 001-1331-564000-100 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT $9,450 107001-2120-564000-200 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT $1,890 418-7250-564000-700 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT $1,890 461-7520-564000-700 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT $1,890 107-1900-564000-100 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT $1,890 451-3510-564000-300 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT $1,890 001-7912-564000-700 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT $1,890 441-3600-564000-300 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT $1,890 FROM: 001-9910-599100-100 CONTINGENCY(GF) $9,450 107001-2120-546100-200 SLOG MAINTENANCE $1,890 418-9910-599300-800 RESERVES $1,890 461-9910-599300-800 RESERVES $1890 107-9910-599100-800 CONTINGENCYIFF) $1,890 451-991 0-599300-800 RESERVES $1,890 001-7912-531000-700 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $1,890 441-9910-599300-800 RESERVES $1,890 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: . Risk ManacementlSafetv Equipment Request #02-177 Defibrillators (12) CONTINGENCY BALANCE: GF:$856,867 FF:$50,000 THIS AMENDMENT: $9,450 $1,890 REMAINING BALANCE: $847,417 $48,110 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: Jf/l- OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-114 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: G :ISUDGETIQuattroIGEN E RAL IFORMSIAM EN DM02. wb3 . m D c :¡; ;: m z -I ;:0 m ~ ~ o f\) , ..... 'J 'J oÜJ<:ÜJorn::OG)"tJ::ooš::: ~ a a a a 3 a a Qj a ~. ø o-t:: 4 t:: t:: ø Q¡ =1;~CQ õ'¡;; as:::rs:;:¡.,~Q,OC/)~ ::E O:J:::J::5~ fè'oa fè'o"tJ~!:Q -t~aE.t::t::gCXJ~::oa:;,~ o 0 § g. g: ¡g '"' ~ ¡¡¡ CD š' ëD ¡:. :--t 0 '<t 5' 5' 0 CQ !l ë:í .., 3 F:§Š"~g¡ -g~ Q~ ëì) ëD:;,:::!:;' Ïi10 3:::.: ""CJ ~\'1)~ë;) ~Cn ~~ g, "tJ~Q¡¡:¡¡-:::!-g :;, C/) t:: :::!:;, [!>;:;: tJCQ 0 g: Q,Q, Ida ~ a õ' ..... (') ~ 3 ..... a a ""CJ O:::!""CJ - øS" ~ ø :;, 0 ;J ~ ....._ ø CD :;, .., ..... \...i ~ ~ C/) g¡ ~ ::0 CD fI> '- ~ (') (') o c Z -I Z C ;: c:J m ?;I t~~~~~~~~~~~~)::. N~~"""",""",,~""""""""-.1.~""""-')"""""~ 01 OJ OJ 0:1 0:1 0:1 0:1 0:1 OJ OJ OJ 0:1 0:1 O;J CIO<O<O CO(Q (Q co CO (Q(Q(Q(Q(Q_ QOooooooooooo~ ëi) CD CD )::. o o o t:: :::! ..... OO.c...c............O-l>.OOO.c..)::. oo.c..U'oooo.....ooOO)o ~~~~~~~c¡n~~~-;"'2 ................ww........c..............................................c: (QWO)U'oCO.....Wf\)WWWU'o:::! .....WO.....O,W01WWWf\)..... ~7"'?C?~I\.)7"?"i"'..............c;:><: 010101 01 O1Ñ01010101U'oU'ot:: 0)0)0)0)0)00)0)0)0)0)0)3 .c...c...c...c..-I>.,.c...c..-I>.-I>.-I>.-I>.o- 0000001000000CD 88888~888888'" ~~w~~8~~~~~~ 000000000000 00000,000000 f\) o o ~ 3 0- ø (j¡ )::. 0- a " ~ ;1'g ~ ~ (1) ~ (1) ë¡:¡ :::::CI) ()C")(1)~ 0Q)c:..Q c: :;::¡ :;::¡ c: i:t0"~(1) '<::: C") CI) CI) o .... ~. c: :§ ëï¡' =:::::J::::....... ~~(1)0 g ~ ~ ~ -. ;;:¡ ~..Q Q5 ~ èi) S. .... 0 s: Ci3 Q37ß(1).... S· (1) (1) S' CI) g:;::¡ ca=Ec:~ -.::..:;::¡ c :;::¡ o~-...;:::; s:(1).....:;::¡ (1) ~ 0 (1) Q)~""O~ ""O~a):. ""0 (1)' c: ~:::Jà:õ Q) C") (1) :. .....(1) ;;:¡ õ' CI) (1) ~ :::J c: :3 (1) 0..(1)0.. Q, g. cQ rn S::;::¡(1)~ ëï¡' C") ~ CD Q) '<: :3 (1) ":'I Q) Q) ..Q 9- 'A - c: Q)' ~, '5' () S!!. t) :3Q)~ª (1):::¡Q)0' :::J ([j :;::¡ ~ .....CI)Q::::: ""0 ..... 'u Q) ~ -... .....0 ....0 õ' en .... ::~:3~ O_(1)rn -.' :3,..., Cij ~v (1)'0.;;. ?;¡ ëri § (1) 0-' . -.,fñ s: (1) c.. C (J -I ;; Õ » -I Õ Z c:J C C G) m -I » ;: o c z ::t ~ tJ .f\) q:¡ 0) Õj ~ ::0 ¡:::.: ~ Õ ::0 I-- ;:0 m ~ z - z m ~ ;:0 m " r- » (') m ;: m z ::t ~ ~ m D c :¡; ;: m z ::t ~ I en .. ~ r:-''' - » o ;:0 z -I " ;: m z ::t ::0 ë;; ~ ~ ~ G) ~ ~ -I » " " ;:0 o < m c ;:0 m (') o ;: ;: m z c m c ~ en <: o ::0 rn :::; o :J:: c:: ~ <: ~ en o ~ o ~ ( ) :-I m or- CC -(") "'Oiii :Þ~(") G'>ZO m-lC Z::;cZ ~IS~ ::;ccOJ mmO O( ):Þ c-lÃJ m"TIC ( )Oo -I::;C"T1 C"TI(") :ÞCño -I(")c f!1>z o~~ ~mn t;.):Þ0 ~ÃJS: ONS: NO_ O( ) ~( ) ,_ NO gz Nm ÃJ ( ) ..,~~... , 1 DEPARTMENT Approved Budget Proposed action: '-" FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 FUNDS APPROVED FROM CONTINGENCY GENERAL FUND AMOUNT REMAINING: $847,417 ITEM ACCOUNT # Contingency 001-9910-599100-800 Reserved for Supervisor of Elections Supervisor of Elect. Loan Payoff to Suntrust Bank Tourism Recovery Plan in Partnership with FLAUSA AS400 Public Safety Software Upgrade Total used: Balance Available Reimbursement of expenses for the AMISTAD Sailing Ship Risk Management/Safety Equipment Request #02-177 Defibrillators Balance Available After Proposed Action: G :\BU DG ET\Quattro\G ENERAL IFORMSIAMEN DM02. wb3 ...." AMOUNT 1,107,452 $107,452 $5,648 $109,931 $18,000 241,031 866,421 9,554 9,450 847,417 DATE 10/01 10/09 11/20 12/18 01/22 01/22 DEPARTMENT Approved Budget \...... FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 FUNDS APPROVED FROM CONTINGENCY FINE AND FORFEITURE FUND $50,000 ITEM ACCOUNT # Contingency 107-9910-599100-800 Total used: Balance Available Proposed action: Courthouse Facilities Courthouse Balance Available After Proposed Action: G:IBUDGETIQuattroIGEN ERAL IFORMSIAME NDM02 ,wb3 ....I AMOUNT 50,000 o 50,000 1,890 48,110 DATE 01/22 ~AH-82-2882 83:15 PM JANET LAFATA spisaféfy .. Safety PrOducts TOLL FREE 1-800-248-6860 ST LUCIE C V~IOUS AceTS. 2300 VIRGINJ\. AVE PT PIERCE, FL 34982-5652 4879773698 P.82 -.."I Quotation FLORIDA P.O. Box '688 3517 Crattaman Blvd. Eaton Park, FL 33840 Phone: 863-685.360' Fax: 883-668-2580 NORTH CAROLINA 801 E Atar1do Ave. Charlotte, NO 28206 Phone: 888'448- 7233 Phone: 704-339-0024 Fax: 704'339-0705 062067 QUOTE# 01/02/02 DATE: CUSTOMER # STL04 ST LUCIE C ~IOUS ACCTS. 2300 VIRGINA AVE FT PIERCE, FL 34982-5652 F99200D2 FIRSTSAVR ABC W/TEXT BIPHASIC 1800.00 EA WAVEFORM SYR/BAT INTERNAL/MEM F99012003 SOFT-SIDED CARRYING CASE FOR 90.00 EA AEDONLY M INCLUDES ONE C~SS OF FREE M TRAINING FOR UP TO 20 PEOPLE ~ AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO. C-3-D .., DATE: January 22, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Michael Rath. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise an Invitation to Bid for the Purchase and Installation of Media Presentation Equipment for the Commission Chambers. BACKGROUND: With the adoption of the 2001/2002 fiscal year budget, the Board approved $120,000 to provide media equipment to televise the Board of County Commissioners meetings. This bid will provide for the purchase and installation of equipment necessary to broadcast these meetings. FUNDS AVAIL.: General Government Services, Machinery & Equipment Account No. 001-1900-564000-100 Equipment Request Numbers: 02-187, 02-188, 02-189 and 02-190 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise an Invitation to Bid for the Purchase and Installation of Media Presentation Equipment for the Commission Chambers and approval of Equipment Request Numbers: 02-187, 02-188, 02-189 and 02-190. COMMISSION ACTION: ou nderson nty Administrator [JJ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attomey.(X) Originating Dept: .J;r p.., Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) Other: ,tf-- Finance: (Check fer Copy only, if Applicable) Elf. 1/97 -, , - , , I \- C/) ...,; @ BJ ~ !:2 ~. ~ LU Ü 0::. <: 0 - C/) C/) ~ ..... ~ . 0 ü <:::E o i. ~ 00 C <: c ¡::O ..... <:( , ~ ~Ck:6j :5 I' 0 <:ða c 0 "I- 10 I> 0:: ~~ljJ0 U) . ... ....J ~<:<:~ c C/) C/)I~ 0 c 0) Q:: C/) g: ~ üOC/)¡:: ..... WN , ~ ~ <: ~ OÜ;::LU ..... Zo c 0 aLU<:LU c 0° lîFi ü ~[ -~ Ck: - [E LU ::E C/)..... It; 0:: W [i. LU ::E<: t/)O 0 ::¡¡:ON Ll. :¡: Ii ¡::CC!ho NO 10' CI) W _o~- ::¡¡:Q::O 0:: u ~lJ..oC/) lig: ~ « ..... C/) C/) OetN ..J 0..- LUCk:LU~ ä: uWÑ ..ii; ~ W' :to!::2::E w >->-N ë 0 a:: en I-..J>- w ~ ~ i 2t::[EO :¡: zetQ:: c ~ W i _<: ü :J ::)Uet z c z ....... s00>- z w Ei Ot/)::) :¡: w <:( 1:5 C/)::ECk:1- I- ui:i:z :¡: ~ ~ z '..-.'. oaLUs z :J u"Q::et 0 a:: ¡:: .-.... LU<:~O 0 oo~ U 0.. !!2 u W 0.. ~ X ..... g"':t:oq:ü u ou"w a:: « ~ ~ . ::::';C/):tLU ~ Q::I-I- d ett/)et C/) LUffiü;:r: owo ',? <: ~::ELU¡"": i 0 '. a:I::)1- -.J Ck:(!) . ¡::: S:~¡::<: >-Ot/) ;~¡ ¡:: , I-ww LUüd]¡:: zQ::::) .j. ~ .' <:<: C/) ::)1-0 "':t:oLUð ozW ....{ ~ LUëi5[Ea ()wc::: C/)'; Ü . CCC/) <:( w::¡¡:et ~. 0 --Ck:Ck: _CoO ::!;. Q ð~f2QJ ()-z ü·.... BJ- ::)::)w LU ÜOC/)u. ..JO~ Q.-.' ¡:! "':t:üCk:° ¡-:Wet CI) "'<: ..... ~ e~et3 C/) ã\ LU ..' ~ C/)¡....:-C/) ~. - <:0 , ~ 1-Ck:0Q <: <: .... C/)0::ECk: 0 0 ~ ¡::: ¡::: LUU.C/)~ ~ <:( CI) ~Ck:"':t:Q g: .... 0 OLU-.JLU ¡..:: LU LU:t-.J::t: "- C/) C/) Q ~ ~ ". It) Ck:ü~¡....: OJ S; ..... 10 , ~ ~""'" ~ It) !::2~ Ck: C\ .....- c Q Q ¿;¡ .' :t C/)O 0 <t <t '.' ::¡ ¡"":C/)"':t:u. LU ¡:.: :it z 0 ¡:.: :J Z W 0 0 a:: z ¡:.: :¡: ¡:: I- W :æ z « « z I- Z W I- ~ UJ a:: Q ~ w u.. ;:. « en e: C> ¡::: Co :;: :J C en -. w ëi 0 :J :;, C W III ..., -....--- ", , , ...J .. ~ CI) ~ l.U a:: . c c 0 -- , <=. c 2 "I- \0 Il) , c c (J) .... t/) I ~ -- c::: 12, c CI) C WN ~ ~ ~-~ zO >" o¡:;¡ . ~ üü UJUJ - I I" z UJ~ caiE t/)'r"' w t/)O :¡¡¡ a a-J -ON w O::-:¡;:~;::!~ ~NO [, 0 ~c:::O c:( ~~;:)ŠLL 0: O<tN ...J w Ii c.. ~~~ffi~ II] OWN' '" w :E >->-N ë .... II:: ::J I-.J>- w ~ . è§üj;:z:lJ.Jer,j z z<tc::: c ël;, w o::UJ§¡"":lJ.J(!) ~ ::)(J <t z z oa 0<:<: z w w¡,' - ::J Ot/)::J :E . C) üCl)~-JlJ.J¡::: 0 oii:z :E ~;. z UJs:ü<ï!O::UJ 0 l.U ¡::. u.c:::<t 0 0: ;. ø C/) 0:: I ~lJ.J-:¡;:UJ 0 OO~ 0 a.. < ~ X ~ w a.. ........ ~CI) -JCI):::E oU.W 0: c:( ..' ~ -2!:! asCl)-~<: C:::I-I- I· ~UJS:~~Q <tt/)<t CI) CWo " a:: ~<:'"" _aCl) ID::JI- 0 s'"" ·CI)UJCI) L.L - (JJ 0:: (JJ ~ >-ot/) f- UJ~~lJ.JUJ:::E I-WW ..... ~ <:ü~~iEo zC:::::J ::J ::JI-O ~ C\JUJa:"( ü ozW f- .. ü UJa . OwC::: ~ O::o::lJ.J:t:::E>-. CI) - ;:z:üOI- w~<t ::¡ ~ ;:)~¡"':<:°5 -0..0 ~ o-z ü O-:¡;:LLOO::O ::J::Jw ~ <:t ~ç[Oèi)ðü .J0C) ~ . W <t CI) ü oè§UJ!:2O:::LlJ I- ~ l.U l-o::(!):::E¡...:;:z: t/) ~ a (JJo~:::E<:¡"': ~ CI) -üOOOLL , S; I-LlJ üüO <= <= (JJo::fS:UJUJI- 0 0 CI)- ~(JJ(JJ;:Z:iE(JJ ¡::: ¡::: S ~ <:t :t: ¡.....: '<::( cc ~ , ß:::.~~~g cc ¡..;.: CI) -- , CI) CI). :;;.- O::sLLaa-:¡;: N ~ ~ a c (JJUJt::UJUJO c ~ ~ ~ N 0 cc 3:<:<:CI)CI)O:: l.U a a \0- ¡"':C"");:);:);:)CQ <:t <:t ~ :it < ¡:.: 0 w z 0:: ::J Z ~ ¡:.: 0 0 z z ¡:.: :E ~ w. w z c:( ~. :IE z w ~ u ~ :IE ¡:¡: 0: º w ~ c:( en 9: C) ¡::: a.. :;: ::J C en w 0 ::J ::J C is w II] ""') _,·_c,__ \ , I '-.. ~ fi] Cf.¡ ::;:. UJ a:: " .. .... ~,; c c I't '"" <:) c c I·' ;g I.C) Ii: · <:) VJ c '. 0) 0::: Cf.¡ Cf.¡1> ~ '"" WN I ~ UJ .' '"" zO ~I:; <: c 00 I;:~ Q) 2: l.U>- c _N <: I- c2:r:1- VJ~ ¡:: z · w ~ l.U 1-<: VJo ..~; ::t ::¡¡: · I-C(!)::> :2°N Q) . NO ~ w 0:: Šl.U<:O I';; t) l.U. CÕÜ :20:::0 ::.t: « > :><0::00 l.U O<cN IR¡ ü ..J ." ~l.U~oq:<::r: ä: UWÑ ~ D- ;'.,. W .. ~l.Ul.U~1- W )-)-N ë ¡..:: It: ;i Q~COCO<:u... In I-....J)- w ·i; C § ::¡¡: Z<co::: 0 <: w CO-J-Jl.UO ::J ::JU<C z ....... <:( Z '.";" ::> èp:! ~ u... I- z 0,;; OVJ::J w g;! i; Cf.¡ t5 oq:::>S OCl) I- :!: 2 z uU:z :!: 0 z y S2oq:l-J:l.U0 ::J u..0:::<C 0 It: ~ ¡:: '.; I- -'<:(üCl)o 0 00-:: t) D- ffi- (/) .; :<:eo:t-o t) w D- X .' ~l.U¡.....:~o...d t) ou..W c:: « ~ w ~ 0:::1-1- - I. OCt:CI) 0::0:: <CVJ<C ;. ~ I 1-~l.U(!)::>co owo ~ ::> <:<:0... II]::JI- ;¡: I.·'.··. oq:OOï::l.UO:: )-aVJ ~o....B:~2:5: I-WW Ii. ~ zO:::::J I, ~ijjo::JO::CI) ::JI-a i; , oq:~~::c:&:~ ozw >. <X) '. i- ....;.. fi] l.U -ü ¡.....: Uwo::: Cf.¡ ..", Ct:~~<:1::CI)CI) w:2<c ~V a:: - ::c:Q::0::>- -0-0 ~ ::>ü ¡.....:l.UCI) u-z ::!;; , 8~~~~~u) ::J::Jw Ü 0 UJ .. ....JaC) Q ;.'1 Q ¡..:w<c Cf.¡ .... a::- oq:l.Ul.U~~ø~ ..... VJ ::!;. s:¿ 2<:~oü<:ï:: fi] ~ · Cl)oq:o<:<:ï::tfj ~ ". 0 -Q(!)oq:OJ: , 1-<:~CI)ëì5(!)~ <: ðl> ã I 0 ::;) fJ3oq:l.U~CI)::J<: ¡:: ¡:: <:( I ::>~<:c~~Q ò? '<1;1 Ü ~ ¡:: o C'\ l.U~ CI) ¡...: l.U ~>- :r: 0 oq: ~ Cf.¡ Cf.¡' ~ 0) ~ ~ O::I-o"¡.....:üo~ <X) c '"" ~ ~... ~ I.C) ~u...CI)2l.Uã~ ~ ('\ c C C,.;· ::;) ......- :r:o-J<::r:::>o 0 <:( <:( <:( ~ I-CI)oq:_l-o;;¡:ü UJ .···1· ¡:.: ð IV z ¡:.: I;. ::J z W I 0 0 c:: z ¡:.: :!: ~ I- W :!: z « z I- Z W l- t) w. c:: 0 :!: w ¡¡: ~:i « ü5 D- c.:¡ ¡:: c.. :> ::J 0 (/) ~ w 0 ::J ::J 0 ë w a:I ~ ,-,--,-,,-'-"-_0-' \ I I \.. ......, @ CI) s;. ~ cr) LU -J Qj CIj (5 ffi I LU:::j en I Qj~ :E oh -JC/,) :? ~I lI..-JLU (J 8 I o~a ~ .... 0 , .' LU<=(3 a - a I> CI) a C/,)a::ü CI) I °LU<: ~ ~ i' CI) Cl.~- L() m 6 I' (!) 0::: 0 0 a e:: CI) CI) .'. ~ ~ ~(5C/,) (J O"J WN ¡::: .... ~ ~:.' lLJ· Cl. -J lLJ 1 zO ~ ~ LU~~ ~ .... 00 a _N . I- ::tOI- a m";' .. z ¡.....: C/,) mo ';; CI) w 0::: . LU ~oN ~ :¡: OCl)~ No I{~ w u..C!)O ~e::o 0 (,) CI)~~ « O<cN j~, ëi5 oJ UWC'li CI) a.. è?LUC/,) £i¿ ~ w ". >->-N c 0:: LULU- w ¡-...J>- w ',ir' :E § ... ~~¡!: m Z<ce:: c 0 :¡: Z Ö (J w <=( <: . :) ::JU<C W F\ ç Z '.. OO<=( z OCl)::J :æ: ~I)~ a -0::: I- ui:i:z :æ: ~ z OCl)LU . z u.e::::<C 0 ¡:: LU~~~ :) oo~ tJ If _;i 0 ~ ~~(5~ 0 w a..¡ii (J >< (,) eU.w 0:: «Fi ~ ~ (,) e::1-1- ~) $8<:~ ~ <CCI)<C 0 LU 0 owe ; a:: <:>-¡::C/,) CJJ=>¡- '" ð I-:o:¡:-J >-om " G3'<:¡...:0 ii en -~ Q:: ¡-ww lLJ ~ofE¡..: zC::::J 'i ~ ::JI-O ¡....... _ü~<: ozw / lJ.. lI..lI..~O uwe:: f-/ 0 LUOüü w~<c ~- f- O:::aoa ...J CI) _c..e «' ð So:::Q<: u-z õ .-.'. O«LU~ ::J::Jw lLJ' 0 üo<:~ ...J°ø Q è§ ¡..:w<c CI). ~CQo<: ::!; ....... a:: OLU~~ m en @ a:: I-¡!:QO :E .... f:( ~C!)<:~ ~ ~.... CI) I- <: ~ c/,)' 0 0········ ~ fJ3¡::CI)Q:: ¡::: ¡:::,i « «i lLJ ~C/,)~O ~ ~< :E 0(5 C/,) 0 CI) CI); ð LUQ~LU a ~ ~I¡ a O:::«Q<: 0 a O"J ~ - .. lLJ a ~OLU<: .... :E!i r.r;,' c{¡ 0 01' 0 ::to:::C/,)0 a S; "I- « «/ ~ ¡.....:Qj~ü C lLJ ...... ¡:.: ð ). z ¡:.: :) Z i 0 0 w z . ¡:.: :æ: ¡:: 0:: w :æ: z « « I- ~ Z W I- U Z 0 :æ: w !J.J 9: u.. ~ « ëñ ø ¡:: a.. :> :) c (/) w 0 :) - 15 ::J -, C W m -.. ---- ---.. - - - , . AGENDA REQUEST 'WI ITEM NO. C4A DATE: January 22,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement between St. Lucie County and Kirschner & Garland, PA for legal representation of indigents for non-capital felonies and misdemeanors BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the BOCC approve the proposed Amendment to Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign it. COMMISSION ACTION: IX] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Bruhn abstained) Do ~Ias M. Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals [X] County Attorney: [ ]Management & Budget: [ ]Purcha.ing: [ ] Information Tech,: [ ] Public WorK5 Diroctor [ ] Solid Wa.te Mgr []Flnance:(checK for copy only, if applicable) [ ] Pubiic Safoty Director Effoctivo 5/96 ~ ...", - INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commi55ioner5 FROM: Katherine Mackenzie-Smith. A55i5tant County Attorney C.A. NO: 02-54 DATE: January 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement between St. Lucie County and Kir5chner & Garland, P.A. for Legal Representation of Indigents for Non-Capital Felonies and Misdemeanors BACKGROUND: On December 21, 1992. the Board of County Commissioners and Kirschner & Garland entered into an Agreement whereby Kirschner& Garland. P.A. agreed to provide legal representation to indigent criminal defendants for non-capital felonies and misdemeanors when the Public Defender is precluded from representation. The partie6 entered into Amendment6 pur5uant to Article 2 & 4 of the Agreement providing for an exten5ion of the Agreement up to December 20, 2001. The partie6 now de6ire to extend the term of the Agreement up to and including December 20,2002 and provide for yearly increa6e5 equal to the annualized con5umer price index. Attached is a letter from Mr. Kirschner reque6ting to extend the term of thi6 Agreement and provide for the yearly increa5e. Staff ha6 not received any complaint6 concerning the attorney5 a550ciated with Agreement. RECOMMEN DATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommend6 that the Board of County Commi66ioner6 approve the Amendment to Agreement and authorize the Chairman to 5ign the agreement. Respectfully 5ubmitted /h/ Katherine Mackenzie-Smith A5si5tant County Attorney , AGENDA REQUEST '--' ITEM NO. C4B DATE: January 22,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: COMMISSION ACTION: Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney Amendment to Agreement between St. Lucie County and George D. Dugan, III, Esq. to provide legal representation to indigent persons in cases falling within the category of Juvenile Deliquency, when the Public Defender is precluded from See attached memorandum Staff recommends that the BOCC approve the proposed Amendment to Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign it. [~ APPROVED [J DENIED [ ] OTHER: [X] County Attorney: Review and Approvals [ )Management & Budget: [ )Purchasing: [ ] Information Tech.: [ 1 Public Works Director [ ) Solid Waste Mgr [)Finance:(check for copy only. if applicable) H:\AGENDAR7.WPD [ 1 Public Safety Director Effective 5/96 '-' ....,J INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Katherine Mackenzie-Smith, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 02-55 DATE: January 10,2002 SUBJECT: Amendmentto Agreement between St. Lucie County and George D. Dugan, III, Esq. to Provide Legal Representation to Indigent Persons in cases falling within the Category of Juvenile Delinquency, when the Public Defender is precluded from Representation BACKGROUND: On January 1, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners and George D. Dugan, III, Esq. entered into an Agreement whereby Mr. Dugan agreed to provide legal representation to indigent persons in cases falling within the category of Juvenile Deliquency when the Public Defender is precluded from representation. The parties entered into Amendments pursuant to Article 2 & 4 of the Agreement providing for an extension of the Agreement up to December 31, 2001. The parties now desire to extend the term of the Agreement up to and including December 31, 2002 and provide for yearly increases equal to the annualized consumer price index. Attached is a letterfrom Mr. Dugan requesting to extend the term of this Agreement and provide for the yearly increase. Staff has not received any complaints concerning the attorneys associated with Agreement. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Amendment to Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. Respectfully submitted ~ Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney 1-16-2002 11 : 12AM FROM P.1 '-" -..; ~~ (!iN ~N ~au, III, J..J\.. ATTORNEY AT LAW $23 $OUTH SECOND STReeT FORT PlaICE. FLORIDA 34950 (S6')~9226 January 14,2002 Daniel McIntyre County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Annex Fort Pierce, FL 34982 RE: 2002 Contract on Juvenile SPD C3.ses Dear Dan: This letter is to confinn that I will have the 2002 Contract for Special Public Defender Juvenile cases. Jay Kirschner is sending you a letter confirming the contract rate for 2002 for my cases as well as his. . Thank yon fro:..your consideration and I look forward to continue to handle the Special Public Defender Juvenile cases. Sincerely, GDD:jt JAN-11-2002 15:~n "--' P.02 .....,¡ KmscHNER & GARLAND Phv.-~ Jconohn dOl' Kndvw Jtth o H. ~ Sœtd CøttIfIed 0rnInIJJ TtW ~ 1000N.2ndSIIMI 1'1.-.-- 1111: 561A9.22D11·Fu: 561.4111.(1810 _.~ e_ -.-OMoom January 11, 2002 YIAREGULAB..MAJT, AND FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION (561) 462-1440 Katherine McKenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: Conflict Contract Renewal/Cost of Living Adjustment Dear Ms. McKenzie-Smith: Please be advised that this rmn seeks to renew that certain agreement with St Lucie County for legal representation of indigeots for non-capital felonies and misdemeanors executed by the parties on December 21,1992. Pursuant to Article IV of the Conflict Contract referenced above, the fees charged per case under that agreement are scheduled to increase in an amount equal to the annualized consumer price index (CPl). For the 12 month period ending in November 2001, the CPI increased 1.9%. I have enclosed herewith a copy of the most recent statistics confi.-ming same from the U.S. Government Bureau of Labor Statistics. The adjusted charges for cases pursuant to the increase in the CPI requires the contract be amended as follows: ('.II ~e- 'J:>:pe: Curo:nt; Increa.sc: Àmp.nrled Co.o;t~ (per """....): Non-Capital Felonies $892.00 $16.95 $908.00 Misdemeanors $397.00 $7.54 $404.00 Violation or Probation peodin¡: with felonies $183.00 $3.48 $186.00 Resentendngs $183.00 $3.48 $186.00 I bave spoken with Mr. Dugan, who advises that the current rate for juvenile cases is $370.88 per case, the increase is $7.05, and the amended costs per case tberefore would be $377.93. JAN-11-2002 15:5~ P.03 '-" ....., Katherine McKenzie Smith Assistant County Attorney January 11, 2002 Page -2- I would appreciate yOUT forwarding the Amendment to the Contract containing the changes above-referenced at your earüest convenience. c:ø-- Jonathan Jay Kirschner JJK.1jd Ene. cc: George Dugan, Esq. JAN-11-20Ø2 15:~~ \..lJnsumt!I' rnce \...-X ~ummary ....", P.04 Page 1 of2 lOTHER AVAILABLE ECONOMIC NEWS REL~A5Ës ...__ M_. .............. ...._.,' ,,__. . Ii) Consumer Price Index Summary FOR TECHNICAL INFORMATION: Patrick C. Jackman (202) 691-7000 CPI QurCKLINE: (202) 691-6994 FOR CURRtNT AND HISTORICAL INFORMATION: (202) 691-5200 MtDIA CONTACT: (202) 691-5902 INTERNET ADDRESS: http://www.bls.gov/cpi/ U5DI,-01-467 TRANSMISSION OF MATERIAL IN THIS RELEASE IS EMBARGOED UNTIL 8: 30 A.M. (EST) Friday, December 14, 2001 CONSUMER PRICE INDEX: NOVEMBER 2001 The Con~umer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) declined 0.2 percent in November, before seasonal adjustment, to a level of 177.4 (1982- 84=100), the Bureau o! Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. For the 12-month period ended in November, the CPI-U increased 1.9 percent. The Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) also decreas~d 0.2 percent in November, prior to seasonal adjustm~nt. The November level of 173.7 was 1.6 percent higher than the index in November 2000. CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) On a seasonally adjusted bðSis, the CPI-U was unchanged in November after decreasing 0_3 percent in October. The energy index, which dec¡ined 6.3 percent in October, fell 4.4 percent in November. The index for petroleum-based energy declined 9.4 percent, while the index for energy services rose 0.1 p~rcent. The food index, which rose 0.5 percent in October, declined 0.1 percent in November. Excluding food and energy, the CPI-U rose 0.4 percent, following increases of 0.2 percent in each of the four preceding months. A sharp upturn in the index for tobacco and smoking products, coupled with larger increases in the indexes for shelter and for new vehioles, aooounted for the acceleration in November. Table A. Percent ohanges in CPI for Urban Consumers (CPI-V) Seasonally adjusted Un- Compound adjusted Expenditure Changes from preceding month annual rate l2-mos. Category 2001 3-mos. ended ended May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Nov. '01 Nov. '01 All Items .4 .2 -.3 .1 .4 -.3 .0 .2 1.9 Food and beverages .2 .4 .3 .2 .2 .5 -.1 2.3 3.4 Housing .4 .4 .0 .3 -.2 -.1 .4 _ 5 3.1 Apparel -.9 -.3 -.6 -.6 .6 .6 -.9 .6 -2.9 Transportation 1.2 -.2 -2.3 -.5 1.6 -2.2 -1.5 -8.1 -3.2 Medical care .3 .4 .1 .5 .3 .4 .5 5.0 4.8 Recreation -.1 -.2 .2 .2 .1 .1 .3 1.9 1.7 Education and communication .1 .5 .5 .5 .0 .6 .1 2.7 3.7 Other goods and services -.4 . 4 1.6 -.! 1.5 -." 1.3 8.6 4.7 http://stats.bls.gov/news.release/cpLnrO.htm 1/11/2002 JAN-11-2002 lS:~' I,.;onsumer mce ~X :Stunmary Special Indexes Energy 3.1 -.9 -5.6 -1. 9 2.6 -6.3 -4.4 -28.8 Food .3 .4 .3 _:2 .2 .5 -.1 2.3 All Items less food & energy .1 .3 .2 .2 .2 .2 .4 3.0 http;llstB.ts.bIs.gov/news.rclease/cpì.nrO.h1m ~ P.0S Page 2 of2 -10.1 3.4 2.6 1111/2002 TOTAL P.0S ~ """ AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND GEORGE D. DUGAN, III, ESQUIRE FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION OF INDIGENTS IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY CASES THIS AMENDMENT is dated this day of ,2002, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "County" and GEORGE D. DUGAN, III, ESQUIRE, hereinafter referred to as " Attorney." WHEREAS, on January 1, 1993, the parties entered into an Agreement (the "Agreement") wherein the Attorney agreed to provide legal representation to indigent persons in cases falling within the category of Juvenile Delinquency, when the Public Defender is precluded from representation; and, WHEREAS, the parties entered into Amendments on September 6,1994, January 10, 1995, January 2, 1996, December 10, 1996, November 25, 1997, February 25, 1998, December 14, 1999, and November 14,2000 pursuant to Article 3 of the Agreement providing for an increase in compensation; and, WHEREAS, the parties entered into Amendments pursuant to Article 2 of the Agreement providing for an extension of the term of the Agreement; and, WHEREAS, the parties now desire to extend the term of the Agreement as amended, pursuant to Article 2 of the Agreement, up to and including December 31, 2002; and, g:\atty\agreemnt\dugan amend '- .....I WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Agreement provides for yearly increases in compensation and the parties wish to amend the Agreement as amended to include the increases in compensation. NOW. THEREFORE. in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree to amend the January 1, 1993, Agreement as amended, as follows: 1. follows: ARTICLE 2- TERM OF THE AGREEMENT is hereby amended to read as ARTICLE 2 - TERM This Agreement shall take effect on the 1st day of January 2002, and continue until the 31st day of December 2002, provided that the Agreement has not been canceled as provided herein. This Agreement may be terminated by either party without cause at anytime upon thirty (30) days written notice. In the event of termination pursuant to this paragraph, Attorney shall complete each case assigned to him through final disposition of the case. 2. follows: ARTICLE 3 - PAYMENTS TO ATTORNEY is hereby amended to read as ARTICLE 3- PAYMENTS TO ATTORNEY A. COMPENSATION Effective January 1, 2002, County shall pay to Attorney $377.93 for each case assigned pursuant to the terms of the amended Agreement. All compensation for representation under this Agreement shall be in the form of a check made payable to George D. Dugan, III, P.A., Federal I.D. number 59-2673037 and mailed to the following address: 323 South Second Street, Fort Pierce, Florida 34950. 3. Except as amended herein, the remaining terms and conditions of the January 1,1993 as amended, Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. g:\atty\agreemnt\dugan amend '- """'" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Attorney has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, and seal the date aforesaid. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney WITNESSES: GEORGE D. DUGAN, III BY: GEORGE D. DUGAN, In g:\atty\agreemnt\dugan amend "' AGENDA REQUEST ...., ITEM NO. C4C DATE: January 22, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Victoria Winfield A66i6tant County Attorney SUBJECT: St. Lucie County Cultural Affairs Council - Member Reappointment BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the BOCC reappoint Marti Reno-Curtis, Margaret Ash and G. Edgar StraefFer for second terms on the Council. COMMISSION ACTION: ou s M. Anderson Co~nty Administrator [~ APPROVED [J DENIED [ ] OTHER: Review and Approvals [X] County Attorn.y: [ ]Manag.m.nt & 6udg<t: [ ]Purchasing: [ ] Information T .ch.: [ ] Public Works Dir.ctor [ ] Solid Wast. Mgr []Financ.:(ch.ck for copY only, if applicabl.) [ ] Public Saf.ty Diroctor Eff.ctiv. 5/96 t "- .."", INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Victoria Winfield, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 02-79 DATE: January 16, 2002 SUBJECT: St. Lucie County Cultural Affair!? Council - Member Reappointment BACKGROUND: Pursuant to section 265.32, Florida Statutes, members of the Cultural Affairs Council may !?erve two con!?ecutive full term!? of four year!? each. The fir!?t term!? of Cultural Affair!? Council members Marti Reno-Curtis, Margaret Ash and G. Edgar Straeffer will expire on February 1, 2002. Each has indicated a de!?ire to be reappointed for a !?econd term. RECOMMEN DATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommend!?thatthe BOCC reappoint Marti Reno-Curtis, Margaret Ash and G. Edgar Straeffer for second terms on the Council. Respectfully submitted { ZlMr\~ 0J -1¿V Victoria Winfield Assistant County Attorney ~ ",",' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM"";' C- 5 DATE: Jan. 22, 2002 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Management & Budget PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin SUBJECT: Request to establish a $100 Petty Cash Account for the Court Administrator. BACKGROUND: On January 9, 2002, the Court Administrator submitted a request to the OMB Director for the establishment of a Petty Cash Account in the amount of $100. In accordance with the Purchasing Manual, Section 3, para 3.3 (b) and (c) Petty Cash Funds, the OMB Director is requesting Board's approval of the above-mentioned request. Once approved by the Board of Commissioners and the Clerk of Courts, the Finance Department will make the initial disbursement to establish the Petty Cash funding for the Court Administration, Petty cash activity will be accounted for within Fund #183, Org. 601, Ct. Administration - 19th Judicial Cir. Court. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners give permission to establish the Petty Cash Account in the amount of $100 for the Court Administration. COMMISSION ACTION: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Coordination/S ia natures C'""~ Attom'Yo XX ~ Ma"ag,m,"' & B"dg't xxel/~""h",;"9 Orig Dept: Airport: Finance: xx_l.1?:1- Other.~)~ Cc.rM /:-6h. r G:\B UDGEn WPlAGEN DA'SlAgenda02\ I '2 2CounPetty Cash. wpd (I .., ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2002-09 TO: Marie Gouin, St. Lucie County Budget Director FROM: ("~ Willis, Court Administrator DATE: January 9,2002 RE: Petty Cash Account My office is need of establishing a petty cash account, probably in the amount of $1 00.00. Please advise as to how to set this up and track (verify for auditing purposes) the amount spent. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. I'" I ,1.\'1 I ,"" .1. THW Ikhg cc: Erick Mershon Thomas H. Willis, Court Administrator . 229 Courthouse Addition, 218 South Second St., Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 + (561) 462-1472 '- ~ '-4 SECTION 3 - PETTY CASH PURCHASES 3.1 PETTY CASH POLICY The cost of purchasing supplies and services of small monetary value through the usual purchasing procedure is usually excessive in relation to the value of supplies and services received. For this reason, the County has adopted a Petty Cash Purchase Procedure, 3.2 PETTY CASH PURCHASE AUTHORIZATION Petty Cash Purchases are authorized for minor purchases as follows: a. Freight and Postal Charges with no dollar limit. b. Minor items with a limit of $25.00 per transaction when needed by a Field Crew or County Facility in a remote location. A remote location shall be a distance of five (5) or more miles from the County Administration Building. c. Fees for summons, subpoenas, and witnesses with no dollar limit. d. Fees for recording instruments and documentary stamps paid to the Clerk of the Courts with no dollar limit. e, Fees for tags and titles payable to the State of Florida or to the Tax Collector. 3.3 PETTY CASH FUNDS The establishment of a Petty Cash Fund and the amount of such a fund for any Division must be authorized by the Board of County Commissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court. a, Any request for the establishment of such a Fund, or for an increase or decrease of the amount, by a Division should be submitted to the Director of Management & Budget. b. The Director of Management & Budget shall submit all requests to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration. c. if approved by the Board of County Commissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Finance Department will make the disbursement to establish or increase the fund. d. In event of the disestablishment of a Division or its Petty Cash Fund, or the reduction of the amount authorized for such a fund, the Finance Department shall be responsible for recovering the appropriate amount from the Petty Cash Fund. 3.4 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN in each Division authorized to maintain a Petty Cash Fund, the Division Director shall designate a single employee as Petty Cash Custodian, and another Employee as Relief Custodian. a. Such designations must be made in writing and filed with the Finance Department. b. The Division Director, the Petty Cash Custodian, and the Relief Custodian must have their signatures on file with the Finance Department, and must certify in writing to the Finance Department their knowledge and understanding of the policies and procedures governing Petty Cash. 12 · \w .....1 c. Petty Cash Custodians will be accountable to the Finance Department for the fixed amount of the Petty Cash Funds under their custodianship. d. Petty Cash Custodians will keep all Petty Cash Funds in a metal box equipped with a lock, At all times other than regular working hours, this locked box will be stored in a safe or in a locked desk. e. No Employee other than the Custodian and Relief Custodian will have access to the Petty Cash Fund. f. In the event of a change in the Petty Cash Custodian in a Division, the Former Custodian must submit the amount of the fund and any unreimbursed vouchers to the Finance Department to close out the custodianship. Only after close out by the Former Custodian will the New Custodian receive custody olthe Petty Cash Fund from the Finance Department. g. Petty Cash Custodians will be liable personally for any loss or misapplication of the Petty Cash Funds under their custodianship, except in the case of theft. 3,5 PETTY CASH DIVISION PROCEDURE Each Division Director authorized to maintain a Petty Cash Fund shall be responsible for enforcing the general authorization for Petty Cash Purchases within their Department. a. Each Division Director shall establish Departmental Internal Control Procedures for making and approving Petty Cash Procedures. b. Any employee so authorized by the division procedure may make a Petty Cash Purchase directly from a vendor in accordance with the general authorization of Section 3,2. c. A Division Director shall have authority to disallow any purchase not made in accordance with Division and County Policy and Procedure. d. PETTY CASH VOUCHER FORM must be prepared to record each Petty Cash Purchase. (See exhibit "A") The Voucher shall be pre numbered and must: 1. Be typed or prepared legibly in ink, 2. Bear the signature of the person receiving the money, 3. Be supported by a Vendor's Original Invoice or Receipt. e. All Petty Cash Purchases must be approved in writing by the Division Manager and the Petty Cash Custodian, who shall affix their signatures upon the PETTY CASH VOUCHER FORM. f. The original copy of the PETTY CASH VOUCH ER shall be submitted for reimbursement, and a duplicate copy shall be maintained on file with the Petty Cash Custodian. 13 '- "'" .. 3.6 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENTS To obtain a Reimbursement for Petty Cash Vouchers, the Petty Cash Custodian will prepare a PETTY CASH REPORT FORM and submit it to the Finance Department. '- ....J ~ 3.8 DISALLOWANCE OF PETTY CASH PURCHASES Any Petty Cash Purchase not made in accordance with division and County petty cash policies and procedures will not be paid or reimbursed by the County. Both the Division Director and the Finance Department shall have the authority to disallow any purchase not made in accordance with such policies and procedures. 15 I. Maria Gorniewicz - Petty Cash .Account ~ Page 1 i '-' .....,I From: To: Date: Subject: Maria Gorniewicz Eric Mershon; Thomas Willis 1/14/023:41PM Petty Cash Account In response to your request to establish a Petty Cash Account, I have prepared a Board agenda item for 1/22/02, Once the BOCC and the Clerk of the Courts approve your request, our Finance Dept. will make a $100 disbursement to you. 1. You will be required to designate a Custodian and to follow the steps described in our Purchasing Manual, Section 3 - Petty Cash. I am sending you a copy of the pertinent pages by inter-office mail. 2. You will need to use a metal box with a lock for your petty cash, 3. Petty cash purchases are tracked through Petty Cash Vouchers. Every time a purchase is made such a voucher has to be filled out and sent to the Finance Dept. along with a purchase invoice/receipt. You will be reimbursed by the Finance Dept. based on the vouchers submitted. Have a good day! ********...*******.****.****. Maria "Mika" Gorniewicz Budget Analyst St. Lucie County BOCC Office of Management and Budget gorn iewm@co.st-Iucie.fl.us 561-462-1733 phone 561-462-2117 fax ..........****...***. ! Maria Gorniewicz ~.R.e: New Petty Cash Account PageD \ '- ....,¡ From: To: Date: Subject: Christann M. Hartley Maria Gorniewicz; Sharon Bouton 1/14/024:24PM Re: New Petty Cash Account We would need to know which Fund the Petty Cash will be established in. We can then assign an account number (after BCC approval), Prior to disbursement, a Petty Cash custodian will need to be named and that person will need to come to Sue in Finance to sign a form. OMB will need to complete a check request with payment being made to that individual. Please be sure that the Petty Cash "rules" are reviewed with the assigned individual as they are written in the Purchasing manual. Let me know if you need any other info, The agenda item looks fine. Christann Hartley SLC Finance Director chrish@co,st-Iucie,fl.us 561-462-1476 >>> Maria Gorniewicz 01/14/02 03:26PM >>> Ladies, our Court Administrator, Tom Willis, has requested that we establish a Petty Cash Account for his office, According to the Purchasing Manual, OMB has to ask the BOCC for permission to establish such an account. In addition, the Clerk of Court has to agree, Please let me know what papef\Alork do you require in this situation, I will route the agenda item through your Dept. In advance, I am attaching a draft of my Board item scheduled for 1/22/02, Please let me know if you would like me to include any specific statements or other information that will be required by the Finance Dept. Thank you in advance for your help! .*.w************************* Maria "Mika" Gorniewicz Budget Analyst St. Lucie County BOCC Office of Management and Budget aorniewm@co.st-lucie,fJ,us 561-462-1733 phone 561-462-2117 fax ********************* cc: Eric Mershon; Sue Moses; Thomas Willis '" '-' -.I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-6 DATE: January 22,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department William R. Blazak SUBJECT: Treasure Regional Utilities Organization initiation of a feasibility study for a Bio-Solids treatment facility. Authorize the payment of $ 12,500.00 as St. Lucie County's share in the cost of a feasibility study to be performed by Montgomery Watson Harza. FUNDS AVAIL: 441-3600-531000-300 $4,750.00 - NHI 471-3600-531000-300 $3,000.00 - NCUD 451-3510-531000-300 $4,750.00 - SHI PREVIOUS ACTION: BOCC previously approved formation of the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities organization, approved and executed a memorandum of understanding and the initial contribution of $ 10,000.00. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends payment of $12,500.00 for the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities Organization Bio-Solids feasibility study. Payment will be made to the City of Stuart as Trustee for the Organization. [x [ APPROVED OTHER: DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: ~ /- '-0/ Coordination Si . .<1 County Attorney: X ',,, I Mgt. & Budget: i Originating Dept:X :\ f.. : /~::-. //C/'/ Other: Finance Director: (Check fÓr Copy only, if applicable}____ Other: ,- Eff. 5/96 '- ....,¡ BOARD OF COUNTY C01\¡WJSS¡ONERS UTJUTJE5· DEPART~¡\ENT WilLIAM DLA.ZA,;< D!REGOP, MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners " / /:(;....1 'L'( ,{ '~. j. t·· ! \' ,~1" / ...:'~ ; 1-, FROM: William Blazak, Utility Director DATE: January 22, 2002 RE: Treasure Coast Regional Utilities Organization BACKGROUND: The Treasure Coast Regional Utilities Organization (TCRUO) was formed for the purpose of developing common plans and projects in an effort to provide more efficient and effective regional utility operations. The official working group consists of several members that have been working together over the past few months to develop an Interlocal Agreement for the Organization. In addition to the development of the Interlocal Agreement the group has been working toward development of a regional Bio-Solids facility to eliminate the land application of sludge generated by member wastewater treatment facilities. The first step in the development of a regional Bio-Solids facility is a feasibility study. The Working Group publically advertised a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) for the selection of an Engineering firm to perform the study. Four RFQ'S were received and oral presentations were made to the Working Group. Montgomery Watson Harza was selected by TCRUO to conduct the feasibility study. Martin County, City of Stuart, City of Fort Pierce and St. Lucie County Utilities are participating on an equal financial basis for funding of the feasibility study. If at any time other participants desire to be involved then equal financial commitments will be required. A draft scope of the proposed feasibility study is attached as well as a draft futerlocal Agreement for the TCRUO. A copy of the Interlocal Agreement has been sent to the St. Lucie County Attorney for his review and comment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends payment of$ 12,500 for the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities Organization Bio-Solids Feasibility study. Payment will be made to the City of Stuart as trustee for the Organization. JOHN D, ßRUHN, District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, Districr No, 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, District No, 3 . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, Dimict No, 4 . CLIFF ßARNES, District No, 5 Counry Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue . Fort Pierce, FL 34982 · Phone (561) 462-1150 .. FAX (561) 462-1153 \..- ....., EX}llBIT A SCOPE OF WORK ANALYSIS OF ALTElli'fATIYES FOR WASTEWATERBIOSOLIDS PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION MONTGOlVŒR Y WATSON HARZA (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULT ANT") will perform the work described in this scope to assist the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTllJTIES ORGANIZATION (hereinafter referred to as "UTllJTIES") with biosoIids management. \\ PHASE 1 PRELINllNARY INVESTIGATIVE PHASE TASK 1 Compilation of Background Information 1.01 Based on the information provided by the UTILITIES, the CONSULTANT wi11 consider the following in summarizing the biosolids produced at each facility: .. Biosolids quantity and quality for past three years. · Overall flow processes for solids handling and/or treatment/stabilization · Growth projections for each facility · Current/future disposal/reuse practice(s) The historical data will be reviewed to detennine the total quantities of biosoIids produced for all facilities to establish current and future production rates. Based on the data, the CONSULTANT will summarize the information provided and define the capacity required for any proposed biosoIids handling facilities. In addition, based upon information provided by UTILITIES, the CONSULTANT will compile data on solids production quantity and quality (volatile solids, metals, organics, and nutrients) to use in subsequent task activities. This task activity assumes all requested information will be procured by UTILITIES and furnished to the CONSULTANT. The projections will be based on a 20-year planning period, or other planning period as agreed upon by UTILITIES. 1.02 Summarize current/future disposal/reuse practices for each facility based on interviews with UTILITIES and subsequent site visits. 1.03 Prepare summary tables and figures showing current and projected quantities based on information provided by UTILITIES. '-- .....I TASK :2 Identify Rell§f ann Djsposa] Options 2.01 Based on the first workshop, potential vendors/markets will be contacted to acquire information regarding the proposed technology/process and the market to determine the suitability of these for the Treasure Coast. 2.02 Prepare summary memo to discuss the benefits and dis-benefits of each market and associated technology to ensure they are consistent with the UTILITIES short and long-term objectives. TASK 3 Conduct Facility SUt! Visits and Workshop ','. 3.01 The CONSULTANT will conduct site visits..!Q (over the 00UrGC of one day) toall wastewater treatment facilities owned and operated by TCRU Working Group members selected facilitiøs to discuss biosolids operations and processes with the operators. The site visits will serve to gather insight into the facility's biosolids processing as well as existing hauling and disposal issues. It is estimatød that five plants ,,¡ill be visited durin!; the day. A summary report will be written describing the site visits. Follow-up phone interviews will be conducted to gather additional information as necessary. 3.02 CONSULTANT will conduct a workshop with TCRU Working group members, including other governmental entities. interested third parties. and industrY representatives to discuss biosolids technology and market considerations. The purpose of this workshop is to review the requirements of potential biosolids product users and ensure compatibility between product characteristics and processing technologies. In addition, the workshop will serve to screen technologies as discussed below. It is anticipated that a total of three technologies will be selected for further evaluation. TASK 4 Identify and Screen Conceptual Biosolids Management Alternatives 4.01 CONSULTANT will identify and discuss various municipal biosolids processing! disposal alternatives. The alternatives will be reviewed based on the ability of each alternative to meet the 40 CFR 503 pathogen vector attraction and pathogen reduction classification (Class AA. A and Class B). CONSULTANT will not evaluate each individual treatment plant's capabilities to treat, store and transport biosolids. \.. -...Î 4.02 Screening criteria will be developed and applied to the various alternatives identified. Based upon this screening, candidate alternatives warranting further evaluation in the alternative evaluation matrix will be identified. The types of criteria that will be utilized in the preliminary screening include the following: a ArJr}licabilitv to TCRU Workinrz GrOUTJ members. a Mechanical complexity; · Odor potential and effectiveness of control measures; a Track record of technology · Waste sidestream impacts; ~ Compatibility with market requirements; a Availability of raw materials required; a Permitting · Space limitations. · Cost. 4.03 Once the work for Phase 1 - Preliminary Investigative Phase is completed a summary memo will be prepared. The Phase 1 work will be used as a basis for subsequent work in Phase 2 - Detailed Evaluations of Biosolids Alternatives. PHASE 2 DETAILED EV ALUA TIONS OF BIOSOLIDS AL TERNA TlVES TASK 5 Preparation and Evaluation of Statements of Interest for BiosoIids Beneficial Use/Disposal '. This task involves the preparation of a statement of interest (SOl) for use in soliciting responses from private contractors on proposed handling, processing, and beneficial use / disposal of biosolids residuals generated among the UTll.JTIES. The purpose of the SOl is to identify potentially viable opportunities for addressing the current and future biosolids management needs of the UTll.ITIES in a manner that provides a high degree of reliability and cost effectiveness. The following provides example criteria on which the responses will be evaluated: · Consistency with the overall objectives of the UTILITIES; · Experience of private contractors with similar programs; · Track record of existing programs; · Technical feasibility of proposed plan; · Viability of product marketing strategy; · Demonstrated ability to procure necessary financing; · Strategy for ensuring uninterrupted processing and disposal of residuals \... ...¡ The contractor responses to the 501 will provide information needed for future. development of a more definitive request for proposals (RFP) biosolids program, as well as a basis for short listing options and pre qualifying potential contractors for consideration in a future, more detailed RFP. 5.01 The CONSULTANT will develop a draft SOl based on formats used for other projects and input from the UTILITIES. The UTILITIES will review the SOl, advertise, and receive responses. 5.02 The CONSULTANT will provide assistance in developing private contractor submittal evaluation criteria and methodology for ranking submittals. 5.03 The CONSULTANT will assist in reviewing private contractor submittals. The review process will be summarized in a Technical Memorandum (TM) outlining the advantages and disadvantages of each submittal. TASK 6 Evaluation of Biosolids Management Alternatives 6.01 Alternatives will be developed from various combinations of markets and potentially viable technologies identified in previous tasks. A matrix evaluation of each alternative will be conducted in order to identify the recommended alternative. The matrix evaluation will be performed following completion of the technology assessments in order to focus the evaluation of alternatives. Details on evaluation criteria, matrix development and alternative screening protocol are provided below. 6.02 Selected candidate biosolids management alternatives will be developed for detailed evaluation. A detailed evaluation of each alternative will be performed based on criteria developed by the UTILITIES. The following is a list of items that will be considered in the biosolids processing/disposal facility cost evaluation: · Public acceptance . Reliability . Flexibility · Operability · Marketability · Traffic and transport consideration a Odor potential · Waste sidestream impacts · Raw materials requirements · Mobile dewaterinz :I Utilization of the Palm Beach Countv Solid Waste Authoritv's proposed Pelletization Facilitv. \. ...,¡ A system of ranking each alternative based on advantages and disadvantages relevant to each criterion will be developed in a workshop with the UTllJTIES. Weighing factors will also be developed for each criterion that will facilitate the ranking of all alternatives in matrix format. Based on this approach, the alternative which is most consistent with the objectives of the UTILITIES will be developed for the recommended plan. . 6.03 Analysis of alternatives shall include investigation of existing av<ùlable specific sites including, but not limited to the St. Lucie County Landfill. TASK 7 Conduct BiosoHds Workshop A workshop will be conducted with TCRU Working grOUP members, including other governmental entities. interested third parties. and industrv representatives to discuss the alternatives proposed and present the advantages and disadvantages for each alternative as it relates to the UTILITIES. The objective of the workshop is to screen and refine the alternatives developed under Task 6. TASKS Regional Biosolids Alternatives Analysis 8.01 Based on the findings, a Draft Regional Biosolids Alternatives Analysis will be developed. The recommended Alternatives Analysis will consider the material handling requirements, storage, biosolids transport, processing (off-site versus on- site), and beneficial use/disposal requirements. The Alternatives Analysis will include, planning-level design/sizing criteria> aÐà-capital costs, operational and transportation costs and schematic site layouts. 8.02 Develop a logical sequence for the biosolids program implementation schedule. Interaction with other agencies will be identified, and a schedule for Alternatives Analysis approval, design, construction, land acquisition and overall plan implementation will be developed. 8.03 Prepare Regional Biosolids Alternatives Analysis report. 8.04 Fee Schedule Phase I $20.000.00 Phase II $30.000.00 DeHverables: '-- ..",J Copies of a Draft Regional Biosolids Alternatives Analysis will be submitted to the UTILITIES for review and comment. Copies of the Final Report will be delivered after the UTILITIES have reviewed and approved the Draft Report. PHASE 3 ADDITIONAL SERVICES The exact scope of additional work under this contract will be detemrined during the life of the contract on a case-by-case basis. Individual tasks will be identified and payment schedules negotiated at that time. These work tasks may irwol','c but are not Hmitcd to one or more of the following: a) Engineering Services related to design and construction. (process advice, residuals facility sizing, design, estimatos of probable cost, etc.) b) Detailed Financial Analysis above and bevond budget level analysis described in Phases I and II. c) Development of an RFP for private or public sector services which may include design, build and operation of a biosolids facility. d) Pemritting, Startup Assistance e) Conduct Biosolids Demonstration Project(s) f) Services During Construction '-" ....,,¡ iNTER-LOCAL AGREEi1:1lENT CREATJ?-m THE TREASURE COAST REG¡OtlAL UTJLlTiES ORGAtJ¡ZATJON -'~ . , " THJS JNTERLOCAL AGREEJ'J1ENT CREATJNG THE TREASURE COAST REGJONAL UTJUTJES ORGANJ7 ATJOtJ, made and entsred into this davof _ J , 2002, among the County of Martin, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the County of St. Lucie, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the City of Stuart, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, a Florida utility authority, the South Martin Regional Utility, a Florida' utility authority, the Town of Jupiter Island, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, the Okeechobee Utility Authority, a Florida utility authority, and the City of Port St. Lucie, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, all of which are collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Members." ~\}ITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Members, pursuant to the provisions of Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, wish to set forth certain agreements among themselves with regard to the creation of a regional utilities organization for purposes of discussing and/or developing common plans and projects in an effort to operate more efficiently and effectively; and WHEREAS, it is recognized by ihe Members that the wastewater needs of their citizens can best be met by vesting such functions in such a regional entity; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Members to protect and preserve the natural environment through good wastewater management practices, planning, and interlocal cooperation; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Members to have two levels of participation in INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION January 3, 2002 (10:13am) PAGE 1 OF 15 '-' ..." the organjzation created: one for those ~¡¡embers thai wiil participate in CapiE! projects and one For those ivlembers in;::t wi!! not participate in capital projects; WHEREAS, it is the intent or the Members that nothing herein shall be construed to preclude the I\!embers individually from continuing to operate wastevvater treatment and transmission facilities for the purpose of meeting their respective needs; and WHEREAS, the Members find that cooperative efforts are necessary in order to effectively and efficiently meet the wastewater needs of the rapidiy urbanizing areas \ served by Members. NOW THEREFORE, the parties to this Inter!ocal Agreement agree as fonows: ARTICLE !. GENERAL Secí:jon 1.1. Creation of the Treasure Coast RS:Ç íonal UJ:mtlss Or~anizatjor:. The Members do hereby provide for and create this organization pursuant to the provisions of Section 163.01, Florida-Statutes (1999), to be known as the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION. The purposes of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION shall be: A. To develop a coordinated venue for discussion of wastewater and other concerns of the Members; B. To discuss and/or develop joint plans for the treatment and disposal of . wastewater biosolids and other matters relevant to the needs of the Members; C. To develop a system for operating and conducting the business of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION; D. To discuss and/or develop any additional plans or projects as needed and INTERLOCAL AGREEí1I1ENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZAïlON January 3,2002 (10: 13am) PAGE 2 OF 15 '-' .....,¡J ,.."'" .......-.-1 ,..... -. t.-. ,.;J _ '1........:.........'""' ~_. ......-.--1 d~rt~U U .JCil LiJ tilt: IVJ\::;¡¡IU8J.:}, CI ;~ E. To perform any other wastewater and other ralatad utility purposes as are perr;¡itted by law and which are approlfed by a majoíity of the Members of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITiES ORGANIZATION. S~ctjon 1.2. Types of Membershjp. There shall be iwo levels of membership in the TREA,SURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION: General Members and Capital Members. General , ~jlembers consist of all entities joining in this Agreement. All General Members will vote and otherwise participate in ai!issues and tasks separate and apart from capital projects. The Capita! Members, however, consist of those General Members that desire to participate in specific capital projects as set forth in separate agreements or resolutions bet\<veen those Capital Members that specifically define the scope and financial commitment of each Capital Member. Section 1.3 Term of Membership. Wi1hdrawal and Notice. Both General and Capita! Members of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES agree that the term of membership shall run annually from the start of the fiscal year as described more fully below. Any Member may withdraw from the TREASURE COAST REGIONß\L UTILITIES ORGANIZATION subject to the notice 'provisions contained herein, by agreeing to pay its obligation for the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION's debt service, if any, afJd such other contractual obligations it has undertaken as a Member. A fee is paid by all Members, as more fully described below, to fund the administration and operation of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION. In order to ensure the INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION January 3. 2002 (10: 13am) PAGE 3 OF 15 "-' ...., C~~·I''''';';'''j a~.-' S'''';-'-I':';'', ~';t;-'e ac:'~'I,,'ls'r-"-I"n "no' O""''''r-i':''ns "or "n" T;:;:~'\'::::'UR¡: CO!'~~I Ui!L :i-i...lii.' ¡ ~ Li-i.J...iI¡ljvl II i.¡11 l.c::tL.:ic:;i ¡...I'_~L¡V. v ll~ Id::..-..u ...... j,\~,' REGION,J..L UTiUTIES ORGANIZA T¡ON as weil as the necessar¡ budgeting and planning on the part of all Members, any withdr;:r~ving f\i:ember shali give written notice of its intent to withdraw, The notice of 'withdrawai must be received by the TRE4.SURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION on or before June 1 preceding the fiscal year for which the Member will no longer participate in the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION. The withdravving Member shall continue to remain obligated for the Administration Operations Fee, as well as the Capital Fee if the withdrawing Member is a Capital Member, as set forth beJo,¡v, for the fiscal year following the notice of withdrawal, if the notice is not received on or before June 1. There shall be no rebates or pro-rated refunds foffees, or any portion thereof, paid by a withàrawing Member prior to its withdrawal from the TREASURE COAST REGiOi'·JAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION. S~ctjon 1.4 Sovereh:;n Immunit1. It is the intent öf the Members or the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION to have all of the privileges and immunities from liability and exemptions from laws, ordinances, rutes, and common law which apply to the municipalities and counties of the State of Florida. The Members intend to avail . themselves of the protections contained in §768.28 and §163.01 (9)(c), Florida Statutes (1999), and of other statutes and the common law governing sovereign immunity to the fullest extent possible. Pursuant to §163.01(5)(o), Florida Statutes (1999), therefore, the Members agree that they do not intend for the constituent Members of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION to be jointly liable for the INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION January 3,2002 (10.-13am) PAGE 4 OF 15 '-' ...." tOilS of th2 offiC8rs or empioY8es, jf any, of the TREASURE COAST REGIOi'Lil..L UTILITIES ORGÞ.NlZATION, or any othei tort attributable to the TREASURE COAST REGiONAL UTiliTiES ORGANIZ1HIOi'J. Further, only the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANiZATiON shall be liable for torts atí:ributable to it or ror the torts or its officers or employees, if any, and then only to the extent of the waiver of sovereign immunity or limitation of liability specified in §768.28, Florida Statutes (1999). Any and all defenses otherNise available to the Members individually will also\ be available to the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION. The TREASURE CO.A.ST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION shall be able to acquire insurance in the amount of the limitation of liability or sovereign immunity waived by virtue of §768.28, Florida Statutes (1999). The píOvisions of this Interlocal Agreement are not intended to transfer any benefit or right to any third parties for the purpose of aHowing any claim which would otherNise be baired under the doctrine of sovereign immunity or by operation of law. ARTICLE It POWERS The TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION shall have the following administrative and substantive powers: 1. To provide a forum for the discussion and resolution of issues related to wastewater and other utility issues; 2. To foster and encourage the development and construction of joint capital projects through interlocal agreements between the Capital Members; 3. To coordinate the manner, time and place that meetings shaH be held and INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATiON Januaf'¡3. 2002 (10:13am) PAGE 5 OF 15 '-' ..., -- "'--\/;d" f",· '''e --'1"1-"" a-..¡ "h'"'lrii_- '"'T- soe-'I-I' m-Q~¡-'l-" ..UµiV ...... VI l1¡, vQI I¡~ IIUluu¡!'8v I 1..,G iiC',- ,, jI.:::J~1 4. To enter into contracts in the name of the TRc}\SU;:<E COAST REGJONAl UTiLITIES ORGP.,NIZ,A.¡¡Oi'i, and to incur debts, i¡abi¡ities and obligations which do not constitute the debts, liabilities and obligatioí1s of the Merrbers individually; 5. To enter into contracts in order to secure the materials or supplies necessary fer the carrying out the functions and purposes of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZi\TION; 6. To hire and to compensate consultants, technical and professional assistants as it shall deem necessary in the exercise of the powers and duties set forth in this Agreement; 7. To sue and be sued, notwithstanding the sovereign immunity protections discussed herein, and be a party to administrative actions in the courts and adminisÍíative bodies of the State of Florida and of the United States; 8. To prepare budget3 and set the respective membership fees of the General and Capital Members; 9. To seek out and accept funds, grants, services or other assistance from the state or federal government or from any other source, public or private; 10. To invest any money or surplus money in the TREASURE COAST ""REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION treasury, in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida; 11. To prescribe a method of auditing; 12. To adopt rules, regulations and resolutions not contrary to law or this Agreement necessary for the regulation of the affairs of the TREASURE COAST INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION January 3, 2002 (10:13am) PAGE 6 OF 15 \.,. ...., REGIONAL UTJLiTiES ORGAtj ZÞ.TION; 13. To have perpetüai existence unless and until terminated; and 14. To have and exercise ail other powers as may be reasonabJy implied under this Agreement and/or necessary and proper to carry out the objectives and purposes of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTiliTIES ORGANILA.TiON. ARTICLE m. BOARD OF REPRESENT A T¡VES AND POWERS SectiDn 3.1 Board of Representatives. AJI powers, privileges and duties vested in or imposed upon the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION shall be exercised and performed by and through a Board of Representatives or by any person or persons authorized by the Board of Representatives to carry out such powers, privileges and duties. The Board of Representatives afthe TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILlTJES ORGANIZATION shall consist of one representative of each of the Genera! Members. Such representatives shall serve without compensation from the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION. Each General Member shall designate and appoint their respective representative, and any alternates, to the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION and provide notice to the TREASURE ·COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION of the same. The representative and alternates shall either be employed by the General Member or be an elected official from the General Member's jurisdiction. Section 3.2 Quorum. A quorum of the Treasure Coast Regional Utilities Organization General INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITieS ORGANIZATION January 3, 2002 (10:13am) PAGE 7 OF 15 '-" ...." ~jle¡¡;bership shalì exist when more than fiftj percent (50%) of the represèrtatives or ti¡8 aitemate rapresentatjljes of the Gensral wlembers are present. Should there be no quorum present, there may be no action taken, although discussion may ta:Œ place. A quon.:m shall exist for purposes of dealing with issues and decisions related to a capita! projeci when more than fifty percent (50%) of the representatives or the alternate representatives of the Capital Members participating on a speciñc capital project are present. Should there be no quorum present, there may be no action taken, although discussion may take place. Sectioi11 3.3 Vot¡n~. Each representative of a General Member, or in the absence of the representative, the alternate representative, shaH be entitled to one equal vote on ail. questions, orders or resolutions with the exception of those questions,orders or . resolutions pertaining to capital projects or matters relevant to the capital budget or capital fee. Only those General Members that are also Capital Members may vote on matters related to capital projects, the capital budget or capital fee and specifically related matters. Unless otherwise stated herein, the affirmative votes of more than fifty percent (50%) of the total number of votes ofthe representatives present shall be necessary to carry any question, order or resolution. , Section 3.4 Officers. The Board of Representatives of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION shall annually elect the following officers: a Chairman, Vice- Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer, each of whom shall serve a term beginning on May 1 and ending on April 30 of the following year. These positions shall be filled by INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION January 3,2002 (10:13am) PAGE 8 OF 15 '-' "'WI the individuals either acting as representatives or alternates or Members, However, if. an alternate is to seíV8 as an officer, the Member jurisdiction continues to only one vete on all matters are more fully discussed above, In the event the individual ceases employment or representation of the Member an election shall be conducted to replace the omcer. A.RTiClE 1'1. BUDGET AND FUNDiNG .'1' Section 4.1 Budaet Year, Notica and Hearim~. The fiscal year of theTREASURE COAST REGiONAL UTiLITIES ORGANIZATION shall begin on October 1 of each year end on September 30 of the following year. During the'month of May of each year, the TREASURE COAST REGiONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION shall begin preparation of a tentative administrative operations budget (applying to all General Members) and a tentative capital budget (applying only to Capital Members)(collectively referred to as "Tentative Budgets"). The Tentative Budgets shall be presented at the first regularly scheduled meeting in the month of June of each year or as soon thereafter as possible. Following the preparation of the Tentative Budgets, the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION shall publish a notice of its intention to adopt the Tentative . Budgets and shall provide copies of the Tentative Budgets to the Members. The notice shall describe the proposed Tentative Budgets in full and include the date and location, for the public hearing on the Tentative Budgets. The notice shall be pUblished once a week for two consecutive weeks in any newspaper qualified to accept legal advertisements with the last publication appearing more than one week prior to the INTERLOCAl AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION January 3, 2002 (10: 13am) PAGE 9 OF 15 '" ....., date of ¡he hearing on the Tentative Budgets. The Tentative Budgets shai; aiso inciude an estimate of the annual contribution of each of the i'vlembers as calcuiated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. Ths hearing on the Tentative Budgets wiii occur before the TRE.ASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITiES ORGANIZATION where an objections may be heard. Based upon those objections, the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATiON, in its sole discretion may amend, modify or change the Tentative Budgets. On or before September 30 of each year, the Tentative Budgets shall be approved and adopted as the final Administrative Operations Budget and the final Capital Budget for the following fiscal year. Section 4.2 Fundinç¡. The TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITiES ORGANIZATION shall be funded by two separate mechanisms: an administrative operations budget (appiying to all General1v1embers) and a capita! budget (applying only to Capital Members). The administrative operations budget shall be used to derive an administrative operations fee payable by all General Members_ The administrative operations fee shall be calculated by taking the administrative operations budget and dividing it by the total number of General Members. Any funds, grants, services or other assistance received from an outside source for administrative operations, such as state or federal 'government shall be subtracted from the administrative operations budget prior to calculation of the administrative operations fee, In order to incur any indebtedness for purposes of administrative operations, there must be a unanimous vote of all of the Members, INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILlTJES ORGANIZATION January 3,2002 (10:13am) PAGE 10 OF 15 ~ ..." /1.. separate capital budget shall ce used to derive a capitai tee for a specific capita! project payable by only the Capital Members participating in that capital project. The capital fee shaiJ be calculated by taking the capital budget for the specific capital project and apportioning it amongst the capital Members participating in that capital project pursuant ta the terms of a separate inter!ocai agreement for that project. Any funds, grants, services or other assistance received from an outside source for a specific capital project, such.as state or federal government shall be subtract~d from !\ the capital budget prior to calculation of the capital fee. In order to undertake a capital project or incur any indebtedness for a capital project, there must a separate Interlocal Agreement between those Capita! Members executing the Interlocal Agreement who agree to take part in the capital project and to be responsible for its costs. Section 4.3 Time for Payment. All fees or charges payable by the Members shail be delivered to the Treasurer of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION within 45days of the postmark date of the initial billing invoice for the fee or charge. Should any Member fail to pay any fee or charge within such time, the Member shall not be entitled to vote at any subsequently held meeting of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION until the sum is paid. All fees or charges not paid within 45 days of ·the postmark of the initial mailing shall bear interest at 12% per annum. 4.4 Audi't. An audit of the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATiON financial statements shall be conducted each year by independent auditors. The audit shall be in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION January 3, 2002 (10:13am) PAGE 11 OF 15 '-' ....,¡ appiica:Jle to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the ComptroJJer General of the United States. ARTJCLE V. INTERPRET A TJON, COrISTRUCTJO¡l, EFFECrJVE DATE AND Afj1ENDMENTS Sectjon 5.1 ntsrpr~rla¡¡on and Construction. This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of Florida. If any piOvision of this Agreement is determined to be contrary to law or to be unenforœable \ for any reason, then to the extent necessary to render the remainder of this Agreement enforceable, such provision may be modified or severed so as to, as nearly as possible, carr¡ out the intention of the parties and the remainder of this Agreement shaH remain fully valid and enforceable. Section 5.2 Approval and Eff,sctiv:e Data. This Agreement shall be approved upon the signature of the first two Members to the Agreement. The effective date of the Agreement shall be the date the Agreement is recorded in the Public Records of each county where Members are located. Section 5.3 Amendments. Amendments to this Agreement, other than the inclusion of additional Members, shall be by approval of a two-thirds majority of the Members. Should any additional governmental entity desire to become a Member of TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTJLlTIES ORGANIZATION this Interlocal Agreement shall be amended to add that municipality as a Member upon the unanimous agreement of the Members and upon the agreement of the governmental entity to abide by this Interlocal Agreement. INTERLOCAL AGREE?I1ENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATiON January 3. 2002 (10:13am) PAGE 12 Of 15 ~ """ Seciion 5.4 Tsrmjnatbn. The TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITiES ORGANiZ¡\T¡ON will continue to have perpetual existence so long as at least two or more Members desire to remain Members. In the event all Members or all Members but one seek. to withdraw from the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANiZi\TiON, as othervvise governed by this Agreement, any funds and assets then owned and he!d by the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION will be distributed amongst those same Members in an equitable and consistent manner to be determined by the Board of Representatives at such time of withdrawal. ARTICLE VI. DISSOLUTiON OF TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTiLITIES WORKiNG GROUP The TREA.SURE COAST REGIONAL UTiLITIES WORKING GROUP ("Working Group") \¡vas created pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Treasure Coast Regional Utilities. Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of this Agreement as defined above, the Working Group shall dissolve and its funds, assets, files and contracts, if any, shall be transferred to the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands and seals as of "the day and year designated. COUNTY OF MARTIN By: ATTEST: DATE: INTERLOCAl AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION January 3, 2002 (10:13am) PAGE 13 OF 15 '-' ...., Approved by: COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE D\,. Uj. A TIEST: DATE: Approved by: CITY OF STUART I"~ By: ATTEST: DATE: Approved by: FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORiTY By: ATTEST: DATE: Approved by: SOUTH MARTIN REGIONAL UTILITY By: ATTEST: DATE: Approved by: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTiliTIES ORGANIZATiON January 3, 2002 (10·13am) PAGE 14 OF 15 ~ ...., CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE By: ATTEST: DATE: Approved by: OKEECHOBEE UTILITY AUTHORITY By: ATTEST: DATE: Approved by: TOWN OF JUPITER ISLAND By: ATTEST: DATE: Approved by: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CREATING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL UTILITIES ORGANIZATION January 3, 2002 (10: 13am) PAGE 15 OF 15 .. v..... '-' ITEM ~ C-7A DATE: January 22. 2002 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: (XX) SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works Dept./Solid Waste Division ~~y: Leo J. Cordeiro Solid Waste Manager TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Staff requests the Board of County Commissioner's approval of Final Payment to Adams Robinson in the sum of $50,000 for construction of the Solid Waste Baling & Recycling Facility. BACKGROUND: On May 3, 2000, bids were opened for Bid #00-035. One Hundred and fifty eight vendors were notified, twelve sets of bid documents were distributed, and five bids were received for the construction of the Solid Waste Baling & Recycling Facility. The low bidder was Adams Robinson in the amount of $8,281,000. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Account # 401-0000-205100-3605. (Retain age Account) PREVIOUS ACTION: May 23, 2000: BOCC awarded Bid #00-035, solid waste baling and recycling facility to low bidder, Adams Robinson, to construct facility at Glades Road Landfill. February 27,2001: Change Order #1 was approved for $242,999.59 & 49 additional days. May 22, 2001: Change Order #2 was approved, resulting in net reduction of $43,871.06 & increase of 102 days. October 9, 2001 BOCC approved a decrease in retainage, from $352,576.55 to $50,000.00. November 13, 2001 BOCC approved Change Order #3 for an increase of 28 days, which results in an increase of $129,283.76, bringing the new contract amount to $8,609,412.29. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioner's approval of Final Payment to Adams Robinson in the sum of $50,000. 131 County Attorney: ~ 131 Originating Dept: (Pub. WkS...¡!¿ Review and Approvals COMMISSION ACTION: KJ APPROVED o OTHER: o DENIED 131 Management and Budget: 1J1.J /131 Other: (Landfill) ~Yið) o Purchasing: ,? o Other: o Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: '-" ...., CDNI 1701 Highway A-1 -A, Suite 301 Vero Beach, Florida 32963 tel: 561 231-4301 fax: 561 231-4332 December 26, 2001 Mr. Leo J. Cordeiro Solid Waste Manager St. Lucie County 6120 Glades Cut-off Road Ft. Pierce, Florida 34981 Subject: St. Lucie County . Glades Cut-off Road Landfill Class I Solid Waste Baling Facility and Administration Building CDM Project No. 6277-25409-074 Application for Payment No. 21R (Final) Dear Mr. Cordeiro: Enclosed are five copies of Application for Payment No. 21R (final) submitted by Adams Robinson Enterprises, Inc. for the above referenced project. Also enclosed are the Consent of Surety to Final Payment, Adams Robinson Enterprises Contractors Affidavit, Final Release and Waiver of Lien from some subcontractors and supplies, and Insurance certificate. We have reviewed this application and recommend payment as follows: Original Contract Amount Change Orders Final Contract Amount Previous Recommended Payments Final Payment Due $ 8,281,000.00 $ 328,412.29 $ 8,609,412.29 $ 8,559,412.29 $ 50,000.00 The only remaining deliverable due from the Contractor is the Contractor's Final Receipt, a copy of which is enclosed for your convenience. Please be sure to have the Contractor execute the Final Receipt in exchange for Final Payment. Please send us a copy of the executed Contractor's Final Receipt for our files. rb3956,doc consulting· engineering. construction. operations '-' ...., CDIVI If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. tke, P.E. Senior roject Manager Camp Dresser & McKee Cc: William H. Snider, P.E.; Adams Robinson Enclosures File: 6277-25409-074 rb3956,doc '-' "WI FINAL RECEIPT Received this day of A.D.,20_of as full and final payment of the cost of all improvements provided for in the foregoing contract the sum of Dollars and Cents, ($ ), in cash, being the full amount accruing to the undersigned by virtue of said Contract, said cash covering and including full payment for all extra work ~d material furnished by the undersigned in the construction of said improvements, and all incidentals thereto, and the undersigned hereby releases the said from all claims whatsoever growing out of the said Contract. These presents are to certify that all persons doing work upon or furnishing materials or supplies for said improvements under the foregoing Contract have been paid in full. The undersigned further certifies that all taxes imposed by Chapter 212, Florida Statues (Sales and Use Tax Act), as amended, have been paid and discharged. CONTRACTOR 6277-074\0]117/00 00800-31 \.r ...,,¡ APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. 21R To ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA (OWNER) Contract for CLASS I SOLID WASTE BALING FACILITY AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING OWNER's Contract No. ENGINEER's Project No. 6277-25409-074 F W k l"hdth h or or accomplis e rougt the date of 12/13/01 CONTRACTOR's Schedule of Values Work Completed ITEM Unit Price Quantity Amount Quantity Amount *WORK $'" * $* COMPLETED "'see breakdown on attached 2 sheets $8,609,412,29 #STORED $# # $# $0.00 MATERIAL *see breakdown on attached 1 sheet Total (Original contr) $8,281,000.00 Change Order # 1 $242,999.59 Change Order # 2 , ($43,871.06 Change Order #3 $129283.76 TOTAL $8,609,412.29 Accompanying Documentation: GROSS AMOUNT DUE.................... $8,609.412.29 Periodical estimate for partial payment LESS BALING EQUIP DEPOSIT........ $1.411,771.00 pg 1.2 & 3 AMOUNT FOR RETAIN AGE CALC. $7,197 .641.29 LESS RETAINAGE............ $0.00 AMOUNT DUE TO DATE................ $8.609.412.29 LESS PREVIOUS PAyMENTS........... $8.559.412.29 AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION.. $50,000.00 CONTRACTOR'S Certification: The undersigned CONTRACTOR certifies that: (1) all previous progress payments received from OWNER on account of Work done under the Contract referred to above have been applied to discharge or secure all obligations of CONTRACTOR incurred in connection with Work covered by prior Applications for Payment numbered 1 through 20 inclusive; (2) title to all Work, materials and equipment incorporated in said Work or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment will pass to OWNER at time of payment free and clear of all liens, claims, security interest and encumbrances (except such as are covered by Bond acceptable to OWNER indenmifying OWNER against any such lien. claim, security interest or encumbrance); and (3) all Work covered by this Application for Payment is in accordance with the Contract Documents and not defective as that term is defined in the Contract Documents. Dated December 13 2001 (Auth . ed Signature) Payment of the above AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICA nON is reco ended. Dated 'þ.c.~bv '2.10 ,2001 By EJCDC No. 1910-8-E (1990 Edition) Pn:par~d oy tht: Engint:c:rs Joint Contract Documents COInmitœe anù endorsed by The Asso¡,;iart:d General Contractors of America '-" ....,I CONSENT OF SURETY COMPANY TO FINAL PAYMENT AlA DOCUMENT G707 OWNER 0 ARCHITECT 0 CONTRACTOR 0 SURE1Y 0 OTHER PROJECT: St. Lucie County, GladescRoad Landfill Class I, Solid Waste Baling Facility (name, address) and Administration Building TO (Owner) r St. Lucie County, Florida 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 I ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: CONTRACT FOR: st. Lu::i.e (hT'ltv, Glëd:s R::::OO Lardfill Class .I, S:ilid Vèste ~ Facility arrl 1dnini.st:ratim ~]; lði n;J -.J CONTRACT DATE: June 30, 2006 L CONTRACTOR: Adams Robinson Enterprises, Inc. 2735 Needmore Road Dayton, Ohio 45414 In accordance with the provisions of the Contract between the Owner and the Contractor as indicated above, the (h.re insert name .nd address 01 Sure" Compony Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America One Tower Square Hartford, Connecticut 06183-6014 , SURE1Y COMPANY, on bond of (here insert rwne and address of Contr.ctor. Adams Robinson Enterprises, Inc. 2735 Needmore Road , CONTRACTOR, Dayton, Ohio 45414 hereby approves of the final payment to the Contractor, and agrees that final payment to the Contractor shall not relieve the Surety Company of any of its obligations to (her. ins... nome and address 01 Owner) St. Lucie County, Florida 2300 Virginia· Avenue , OWNER, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 as set forth in the said Surety Company's bond. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Surety Company has hereunto set its hand this 13th day of December _ 2001 Attest~. ~.:-- () ~~ (Seal): \:j ~~) ,~ ì I I I / I NOTE: This form is to be used as a companion document 10 AlA DOCUMENT G706, CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT OF PAYMENT OF DEBTS ANr CLAIMS, Current Edillon AlA DOCUMENT G707 . CONSENT OF SURETY COMPANY TO FINAL PAYMENT' APRil 1970 EDITION' AIAt8 ~ 1970 . THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. 173S NEW YORK AVE.. NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 ONE PA TRA~ CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND stJRETY COMPANY F.ARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY Hartford, Connocti.CIIt 06183-9062 ...." POWER or ATTORNEY AND CERTIFICATIt OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY(S)-IN-FACT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT TRAVELERS CASUALTY Á1.~ SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA. TRAVJr.T.1r.RS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, corpmatians duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut, and having their priucipal offices in the City of Hartford, County of Hartford. State of Connecticut, (hereinafter the "Companies") hath made, constituted and appointed, aDd do by these presents make, constitute and appoint: Amanda L. Morris, Charles D, Castle. Christopber M. McAtee, David E. GriffiD. Jennifer L. SaIm, KatberineJ, Mahaffy, Mark S. Romäuak, NichoJu J. Bertke, WUtiam R. Thompson, of DaytoD, Ohio, their true and lawful Attonu:y(s)-in.Fact. with full power'and authority hereby conferred ro ¡ig-n, execute and acknowledge, at ;my place within the United States, the following instrument(s): by hislher sole signature and act, any and all bondS. recognizances., ContraCtS af inðf'mnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking and any and all consents incident thereto and to bind the Companies, thereby as fully and to the same extent all if the same were signed by the duly authori7trl officers of the Companies, and all the acts of said Attomey(s)-in.Fact, pursuant to the authority herein given, are hereby ra1iñed. and coDfinncd. TIùs appointment is made UIJder and by authority of the ~ollowìng Standing ~utions of said Companies. whìch ResolutíoDS are now in filll force and effect: V01ED: That tlle Chairman. the Prcidc:nt, any Vice C1uUrman, any Execntive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President. arrj Second.Vice President, the Treasurer. any A3sisumt Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or arrj Assistant Secretary may appoint Attomeys-in-FI1Ct md Agents to I1Ct for and on behalf of the company and may give sudl a.-ppoinlœ suclt anlhority as his or her certificate of aU1hority may prescnòe to:rign with the Company's name: and seal with the Company'! seal bonds, recognizan.çes, ecntracts of indemnity, and other ~ obligatory in the nature of a band, rl CQi"'7>l"œ, or conditional undertaking, and any of said officers or the Board of Directors at any time may remove any such appointee and ravo1œ the power given him or her. VOTED: That the Cba.irman, the PrcsidE:nt, any Vice Chairman, my Executive Vice PrcsidmIt. any Senior Vice President or any Vice President may delegate all or any part of the foregoing authority to one or more officers or employees of Ibis Company, provided that each such delegation is i.u wÜwlg und ~ copy thereof is 1Uec11n the oJIicc of the secretary. VO!El}, That any bond. recognizance, conine! of iDdemnity, or writing obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance. or conditiollal undertaking sba11 be valid. and binding upon the Company when (8.) 5igned by the President, any Vice ChaimuIn, any Executive Vice Presìclcn1, any Senior Viœ President or any Vice President, any Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any A3sistant Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any As3ÌSumt Secretary and duly attested and sealed with \he Company's seal by II. SecreWy or Assistant Secretary, or (b) duly CJŒCI1ted (under seal, if required) by one or more Atto~in.Fact and Agents punumt to the power prescribed in his or her =-tificate or their certificates of authority or by one or more Company o:t1icers pursuant to a written delegation of authority. This Power of AttDl'Dey and Certificate of Authority is siped and sealed by facsimile (mechanical or printed) uader and by autbority of the loJlowìn& Standing ResolutiOD voted by the Boards of Directon of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPA..'lY, which Resolution is now in full force and effect: VOTED: That The :rignature of cadi of 'the following officers: President, any Executive VICe President. MY Senior Viœ President, any Vicc Prc:Iident, any Assistant Viœ President, any Sccrc:taIy, any Assistant Sacretmy, and the seal of the Company may be eJ:IDœd by facsimile to any power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appoÙlting Residc:nt Vice Presidents, Resi<kn1 Assistant Secretaries or AUomeys-in-FI1Ct for PWi'OSCS only of executing and attesting bonds and undI:rtaIcings and other writings obligutory in the nature thereof, and any sudl power of attorney or certi£cate bearins such facsimila sigNIlurc or f'ocsìmilc s.:al :!bAll be valid And bi.ulliJJ.!! "F"u il... Company and any SUCÀ power so CXl:cuted and certifi.cd by such facsimili: sigmture (IUd J:àcsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the futuro with re..o¡pect to any bond or underœkìnll to which it is attached. (11.00 SIancIard) J I I I \ I ! I I i ¡ í '-' '-' CLASS I SOLID WASTE BALING FACILITY (CONTRACT) CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT Final Estimate STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) ) ss COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE The undersigned, Thomas M. Jobe hereby represents that ADAMS ROBINSON ENTERPRISES was awarded a contract by the County of St. Lucie herein after called the Owner, to Class I Solid Waste Baling Facility - Glades Road Landfill, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Contract No. One; and the undersigned further represents that the subject work has now been accomplished and the said contract has now been completed. The undersigned hereby warrants and certifies that all of its indebtedness arising by reason of the said contract has been fully paid or satisfactorily secured; and that all claims from sub-contractors and others for labor and material used in accomplishing the said project, as well as all other claims arising from the performance of the said contract, have been fully paid or satisfactorily settled. The undersigned further agrees that, if any such claim should hereafter arise, it shall assume responsibility for the same immediately upon request to do so by the Owner. The undersigned, for a valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does further hereby waive, release and relinquish any and all claims or right of lien which the undersigned now has or may hereafter acquire upon the subject premises for labor and material used in accomplishing said project owned by the Owner. This affidavit is freely and voluntarily given with full knowledge of the facts on this / 1 day of Pec4!'>l'1~£)t(. Zoo I ,A.D. , ~~~~ / ontractor By 'OV(~a P"',,"J'l"eT þt~#6~ Title Subscribed and sworn to before me this /StiLdayof ~!.Jt1'fAi¿,U_../, in the year of our Lord, fl¡)o I Notary Public ANITA l DUDDIN . . ,ary Public In and for the State of Ohio My Commission Expires My Commission ExDires Oct. 2, 2005 SEAL - a C"'i ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~. ;- UJ J U ., ~ \w FINAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIEN """" v IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Five Hundred and Fiftv-Five Dollars and 50/100 Dollars ($555.50) to be paid to the undersigned by Adams Robinson Construction Co. hereinafter referred to as "Contractor," as full and final payment for all work required of and performed by the undersigned for the Contractor on that certain project known as St. Lucie Baling Facility in Ft. Pierce. FL including, without limitation. all work performed under in connection with Sub Contract No. A-2962 dated August 8. 2000. together with all additions, supplements and change orders to and modifications of said Subcontract, and all other work, if any, performed by the undersigned on said project. 1. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, with respect to all of such work: A.) All labor employed thereon or in connection therewith and all payroll taxes and charges such as Withholding Taxes, Social Security Taxes, and Workers' Compensation, Disability and Unemployment Taxes and/or Insurance Premiums and all applicable union fringe benefits have been paid in full. B.) All materials. tools, equipment, supplies and services furnished and used upon or in connection with said work have been paid for in full, and all sales, use, excise and similar taxes on or in connection with the same have been fully paid. 2. The undersigned hereby releases and forever discharges the Contractor, the Owner (as identified in said P.O.lSubcontract), their respective sureties, if any, and all lands, improvements, chattels and other real and personal property connected with or a part of said project from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien whatsoever arising out of said P.O.lSubcontract and/or said work and which it now has or hereafter might or could have. 3. The undersigned will, at its sole cost and expense, forever defend and hold harmless the Contractor and the said Owner from any and all claims and demands and will defend against and obtain the discharge of any and all liens, claims of lien and notices to withhold payment made by others arising out of or in connection with said work, including, without limitation, those claimed or by any employee, supplier or subcontractor of the undersigned (or by any employee or supplier of a subcontractor of the undersigned), or by any governmental agency or insurance carrier. 4. In the evëÎ1t that any of the work performed by'the undersigned on said project (including the materials used or incorporated therein and the workmanship thereof) is the subject of any guaranty or warranty by the undersigned, neither the giving of this release and waiver of lien by the undersigned nor its acceptance by the Contractor shall operate in any way to reduce or modify such guaranty and warranty or to release the undersigned therefrom. The undersigned further agrees that if it hereafter performs any labor or furnishes any materials, tools, equipment, supplies or services pursuant to such guaranty or' warranty, it will fully pay any and all taxes and charges in connection therewith and will release, discharge, defend and hold harmless the Contractor and Owner and the said lands, improvements, chattels, and other real and personal property from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien arising in connection therewith all In a like manner and to the same extent as it herein provided with respect to labor, materials, etc., heretofore furnished. This release and waiver of lien shall inure to the benefit of the Contractor, the Owner, and their respective sureties, successors and assigns and shalt be binding upon the undersigned and its or their heirs, successors and assigns. Dated this Iff ,l-"Í. day of .AJ¿/V<?~"~ 2001 at II~);J ~¡.4z, J...: ' COMPANY: .;;;L/~ rt; (SEAL) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: (OFFICER OR OWNER) /£èr"?,¿:7~ Subscribed and sworn before me this ~ &~ day of !!:!jj,;-~~Þ H, -œ BE11Y...IEAN LEONARD /oK( cm'Iò::sSiCN f 00005662 . .' EXPIRES' A?' 8. 2005 , .., 0''''''' & Sondin\ . Ir.:: 1~3-N':)T.,Fr" R.M;'N'f.- .... .. ., .¡ ...-.~-_.-. ........- .......- fillu/release/lr 20Gl -l ¡ -07 \w RECEIVED D~O FINAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIEN . 3 2001 / \ \. IN CONSIDERA nON of the sum of Five Thousand Ei¡:ht Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars and 90/100 Dollars ($5,825.90) to be paid to the undersigned by Adams Robinson Construction Co hereinafter referred to as "Contractor," as full and final payment for all work required of and performed by the undersigned for the Contractor on that certain project known as St. Lucie Balin!: Facility in Ft. Pierce. FL including, without limitation, all work performed under in connection with Sub Contract No. A-2954 dated July 12. 2000. together with all additions, supplements and change orders to and modifications of said Subcontract, and all other work, if any, performed by the undersigned on said project. 1. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, with respect to all _. of ~uch work: ,'1-- - All labor employed thereon or in connection therewith and all payroll taxes and charges such as Withholding Taxes, Social Security Taxes, and Workers' Compensation, Disability and Unemployment Taxes and/or Insurance Premiums and all applicable union fringe benefits have been paid in full. All materials, tools, equipment, supplies and services furnished and used upon or in connection wi1;h said work have been paid for in full, and all sales, use, excise and similar taxes on or in connection with the same have been fully paid. , ---------------------- 2. The undersigned hereby releases :md forever discharges the Contractor, the Owner (as identified in said P.O.lSubcontract), their respective sureties, if any, and all lands, improvements, chattels and other real and personal property connected with or a part of said project from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien whatsoever arising out of said P.O.lSubcontract and/or said work and which it now has or hereafter . might or could have. 3. - The undéisignédWill,' at its sole cost and expeñse~ forever' defend and höld harmless the Contractor and the said Owner from any and all claims and demands and will defend against and obtain the discharge of any and all liens, claims of lien and notices to withhold payment made by others arising out of or in connection with . said work, including, without limitation; those,claimed'or-by any employee; supplier or subcontractor of the undersigned (or by any employee or supplier of a subcontractor of the undersigned), or by any governmental agency or insurance carrier. 4. In the event that any of the work performed by the undersigned on said project (including the materials used or incorporated therein and the workmanship thereof) is the subject of any guaranty or warranty by the undersigned, neither the giving of this release and waiver of lien by the undersigned nor its acceptance by the Contractor shall operate in any way to reduce or modify such guaranty and warranty or to release the undersigned therefrom. The undersigned further agrees that if it hereafter performs any labor or furnishes any materials, tools, equipment, supplies or services pursuant to such guaranty or warranty, it will fully pay any and all taxes and charges in connection therewith and will release, discharge, defend and hold harmless the Contractor and Owner and the said lands, improvements, chattels, and other real and personal property from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien arising in connection therewith all in a like manner and to the same extent as it herein provided with respect to labor, materials, etc., heretofote furnished. This release and waiver of lien shaH inure !O the benefit of the CúIl!ractur, the OWller, anù their respective sureties, successors and assigns and shall be binding upon the undersigned and its or their heirs, successors and assigns. ;(ð~ Dated this day of -..nc9<J. ,2001, at A~mm~G f-~ . COMPANY: (SEAL) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: efore me this' 3~'- -~ay ~r~::£:-1."'~~ .¡~ Sharon Alvenla Green ~ ~ COl!1!"!~.?n # cc 774428- My"!i.. :r ~eCT.16,2002 '1'x BONDED THRU -~-OF f\: ATLANTIC BONDING CO..INC. ~¡.:J~nr?~1 ¡Iii". ¡ '~.~" . ~III , 2QPh- OlG, 0,4 2001 I~ I . '"I''' I ...., ~ .: "1 1-,' ~..,; y c :1.._J\':'" LJLrUï TITLE: (OFFICER OR OWNER) .-------------------- Jjllaireleaseltr 2001·11-12 "'" R E. "f!1{ I FINAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIEN . VEa NOV 3 ~/ o l¡....í IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty-Five Dollars and 00/100 Dollars ($1,335.00) to be paid to the undersigned by Adams Robinson Construction Co hereinafter referred to "aš "Contractor,· as full and final payment for all work required of and performed by the undersigned for the Contractor on that certain project known as St. Lucie Balin!: Facility in Ft. Pierce. FL including, without limitation, all work performed under in connection with Sub Contract No. A-2974 dated Aueust 17. 2000. together with all additions, supplements and change orders to and modifications of said Subcontract, and all other work, if any, performed by the undersigned on said project. ~ '-~)f'! 1. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, with respect to all of such work: All labor employed thereon or in connection the!'ewith and all payroll taxes and charges such as Withholding Taxes, Social Security Taxes, and Workers' Compensation, Disability and Unemployment Taxes and/or Insurance Premiums and all applicable union fringe benefits have been paid in full. All materials, tools, equipment, supplies and services furnished and used upon or in connection with said work have been paid for in full, and all sales, use, excise and similar taxes on or in connection with the same have been fully paid. . __-...-.!:-..-.-fh~-;;dersigned hereby releases and forever discharges the Contractor, the Owner (as identified in said .- P.O.lSubcontract), their respective sureties, if any, and all lands, improvements, chattels and other real and personal property connected with or a part of said project from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien whatsoever arising out of said P.O.lSubcontract and/or said work and which it now has or hereafter might or could have. 3. The undersigned will, at its sole cost and expense, forever defend and hold harmless the Contractor and the said Owner from any and all claims and demands and will defend against and obtain the discharge of any and all liens, claims of lien and notices to withhold payment made by others arising out of or in connection with said work, including, without limitation, those claimed or by any employee, supplier or subcontractor of the undersigned (or by any employee or supplier of a subcontractor of the undersigned), or by any governmental agency or insurance carrier. 4. In the event that any of the work performed by the undersigned on said project (including the materials used or incorporated therein and the workmanship thereot) is the subject of any guaranty or warranty by the undersigned, neither the giving of this release and waiver of lien by the undersigned nor its acceptance by the Contractor shall operate in any way to reduce or modify such guaranty and warranty or to release the undersigned therefrom. The undersigned further agrees that if it hereafter performs any labor or furnishes any materials, tools, equipment, supplies or services pursuant to such guaranty or warranty, it will fully pay any and all taxes and charges in connection therewith and will release, discharge, defend and hold harmless the Contractor and Owner and the said lands, improvements, chattels, and other real and personal property from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien arising in connection therewith all in a like manner and to the same extent as it herein provided with respect to labor, materials, etc., heretofore furnished. This release and waiver of lien shall inure to the benefit of the Cnntrar.tor. the Owner, and their respective sureties. successors and assigns and shall be binding upon the undersigned and its or their heirs, successors and assigns. Dated this a ~ ~ day of ~D \I. , 2001, at COMPANY: PEDERSEN LATIITNG & PLASTERING INC. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: V1~ TITLE: (OFFICER OR OWNER) ~ ~S~ .A- Subscribed and sworn before me this ê2lo ~ day of 1-J.o\1 . ~~bQ,.~. û.oðQ~ Notary Public My Commission Expires (~~f~L) ,2001 i'ð...... Selina S Delgado ~~*My CommiSSIOn CC821240 .~.. ",/ Exptres May 1 2003 Ji"ulreleuJeltr 2001-11-I}7 FINAL RELEASE A1~D WAIVER OF LmN R~Cf/~ .."I "tD IIOr 2 , 200¡ I [6SÇ9 ON XH/X~] ~:SI 30~ 100l/0l/11 IN CONSJDERA TION uf Lh<: ~WIJ. of Fou'- Hundred and Fortv-One Dollars and 80/100 Dnl1Dr" ($441.80) to be paid to ¡he undersigned by Adams Robin~n Constrocrion Co hereinafter referred to as ·Contractor,· as full and final payment for all work requirt:d of and performed by the undersigned for the Contractor on that certain project known as St. Lucie Batln~ Facility in Ft. Pierce. FL including, without limitation, all work performed under in connection with SUb Contract No. A-2975 dated Au,u.<d 17. 2000. together with all additions. supplements and change orders to and modifications of said Subcontract, .ond 1111 other work, if :my, performed by the undersigned on said project. 1. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, with respect to all of sueb work: Alll:!.bor employcd thereon or in r:"C)n"p.('.t;(m rhp.tp.wirh anrl all payroll ta)(es and charge!\ such as Withholding Taxes, Social Security Taxes, and Workers' Compensaûon, Disability and Unemployment Taxes and/or Insurance Premiums and all applicable union fringe benefits have been paid in fun, All materiab, tools, equipment, supplies and services furnished and used upon or in connection wilh said work have been paid for in full, and all siÙCS, use, excise and similar taxes on or in connection with the same have l:5een tully p:ud. 2. The undersigned hereby releases and forever discharges the Contractor, the Owner (as idemified in said l' .O.lSubcontr!lCl). l1u:U" n:!S J4;;\;Livt: !Su1"lic:., if allY, and iillI4I1~. iœp!;Qvc:me.nb, chattels and other rcal1\Il& personal property connected with or a?art of said project from an~ and all claims, demands. liens and claims of lien whatsoever arising out of said P.O.lSubcontracl andlor saId work and which it now has or hcrc:after might or could have. A.) B.) 3, The tmdersigned will, at its SQle cost and expense, forever defend' and hold harmless the Contractor and the , said Own/!r from :m;v and all claims and demands and will defend agamst and'obtain the discharge of any and a 11 liens, claims of hen and notice$ to withhold paymem made by others arising out of or in connection with said worle, including, without lirnitacion, those claimed or by any employee, supplier or subcontractor of the undersigned (or by am' employee or supplier of a-subcontractor of the·undenigned),. or by any governmental agertcý"or"insur3nce tarrier. '. ' .'" 4. In the event that any of Ihe worle performed by Ihe undersigned on said project (including the materials used or incorporated therein and the worlcnanshlp thereof) is the ~ubjccl of auy ~u"Lil.uly 01 warra.aty by thø undersigned, neither the giving of this release and waiver of HeXl by the undersigned nor its acceptance by the Contractor shall operate in any way to reduce or modify such gu.aranty and warranty or to relea.~e the undersig¡¡eu Ifu:n;f10lil. The undersigned further agn:C3 tbot it' it hereafter perfot"a1& any labor or furnishes any materi¡us, cools, equipment, supplies or services pursuant to such guaranty or warranty, it will fully pay any and all taxes and charges in connec~ion therewith and will release, discharge. defend and hold harmless the Contractor nnd Owner and the ,aid lands, impTovements, d,arrp.1~. ;mrl other n:at and personal property fmm any and all claims. demands, liens and claims of Hen arising in COXlnection therewith aU in a lìke manner and to the same extent as it herein provided with respect to l¡¡bor. materials, etc., heretofore furni~hG:d. This n:]case and waiver of lien shall inure 10 the benefit ot" the Contractor. the Owm:r, and their respective sureties, ,~ucccssors and assigns and shall be binding upon the undersigned and its or their heirs, successors and assigns. Dated this {q'b. day of f.10U.f..WI~ ,2001,al 61-[0(').-1 ~ "RED FIRRPROOFlNG & INSULATION. INt::. ¿~£- SIGNATURE: TITLE: (OFFICER OR Owr."ER) (;!élwe.rc& In /2tJ,ard..s ,. ~SìJ.u;;:lp 'ubscribed and sworn before me this I q1> day of f.io ~ faI-I2- ·/~3/01/ My Commission Expires ,2oot rGì~:f~JrrIl\jafq : !' ! , . OfC 04: 2üü"1; fli",lrel<,,>.Ur Z()(}1-1 1-07 ~ , ~~ ' ; : ;i..._.............-.r_.',-'.......~...... ._........ ..J\,I U ~ ~~ ~-..J~ ',__"J ~j '~ 0_:0]'~ - - '-.... -~ -~.- -.-'-'-.........,..' .,.... " '-' -...J FINAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF i&c£JvÉo DEe 0 4 2001 j/ IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of SixThousand Three Hundred Seventeen Dollars and 99/100 Dollars ($6,317.99) to be paid to the undersigned by Adams Robinson Construction Co. hereinafter referred to as . Contractor , . a:; full and fmal payment for all work required of and performed by the undersigned for the Contractor on that certain project known as St. Lucie BaIiD~ Facilitv in Ft. Pierce. FL including, without limitation, all work performed under in connection with Sub Contract No, A-2951 dated JUDe 29. 2000. together with all additions, supplements and change orders to and modifications of said Subcontract, and all other work, if any, performed by the undersigned on said project. 1. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, with respect to all of such work: A.) All labor employed thereon or in connection therewith and all payroll taxes and charges such as Withholding Taxes, Social Security Taxes, and Workers' Compensation, Disability and Unemployment Taxes and/or Insurance Premiums and all applicable union fringe benefits have been paid in full. B,) All materials, tools, equipment, supplies and services furnished and used upon or in connection with said work have been paid for in full, and all sales, use, excise and similar taxes on or in connection with the same have been fully paid. 2. The undersigned hereby releases and forever discharges the Contractor, the Owner (as identified in said P.O.lSubcontract), their respective sureties, if any, and all lands, improvements, chattels and other real and personal property connected with or a part of said project from an~ and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien whatsoever arising out of said P.O.lSubcontract and/or saId work and which it now has or hereafter might or could have. 3. The undersigned will, at its sole cost and expense, forever defend and hold harmless the Contractor and the said Owner from any and all claims and demands and will defend against and obtain the discharge of any and alllit:ns, claims of lien and notices to withhold payment made by others arising out of or in connection with said work, including, without limitation, those claimed or by any employee, supplier -or subcontractor of the undersigned (or by any employee or supplier of a subcontractor of the undersigned), or by any governmental agency or insurance carrier. .- 4. In the event that any of the work performed by the undersigned on said project (including the materials used or incorporated therein and the workmanship thereot) is the subject of any guaranty or warranty by the undersigned, neither the giving of this release and waiver of lien by the undersigned nor its acceptance by the Contractor shall operate in any way to reduce or modify such guaranty and warranty or to release the undersigned therefrom. The undersigned further agrees that if it hereafter performs any labor or furnishes any materials, tools, equipment, supplies or services pursuant to such guaranty or warranty, it will fully pay any and all taxes and charges in connection therewith and will release, discharge, defend and hold harmless the Contractor and Owner and the said lands, improvements, chattels, and other real and personal property from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien arising in connection therewith all in a like manner and to the same extent as it herein provided with respect to labor, materials, etc., heretofore furnished. This release and waiver of lien shall inure to the benefit of the Contractor, the Owner, and their respective sureties, successors and assig~and shall be binding upon the undersigned and its or their heirs, succe~sors and assigns. Dated this ~ day of tv 0 l/e;v t tr , 200 I, at I rru.svl UE ~ COMPANY: TEAM REBAR. INC. (SEAL) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: ~7 fCes- ;kn of 5 twe/1 t.or:fat~ jinalreleaj'elrr 2()()J·11-12 TITLE: (OFFICER OR OWNER) n~j 'h..;;:x) "Dt,-YOf ~'Il¿J--L ~ .2001 ..'~"" Cindy L Schermer * ~ * My ComnÏission CC988319 .~~.. ~es DACArnber 17 2004 Pr'ot. type or s·Y;;-~-;:;;$:J::L~_..- ..) I", p ri2.7IC ::.1 l'lotJr P bl .-Y" , ~i~l;raPy k.~O"i:1 rn "'---:;, YUle " " LW"'= nCdd'ed I D 0 'I.a jf d num:er af I D". . '. . '." :Jd~ced: My Commission Expires -- ------ '-"' REeVeD N . Dv 2 FINAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIEN V 6 2001 IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Nine Hundred and Seven Dollars and 00/100 Dollars ($907.00) to be paid to the undersigned by Adams Robinson Construction Co, hereinafter referred to as ·Contractor,· as full and final payment for all work required of and perfonned by the undersigned for the Contractor on that certain project known as St. Lucie Baling Facility in Ft. Pierce. FL including, without limitation, all work perfonned under in connection with Sub Contract No. A-3048 dated Mav 21.2001. together with all additions, supplements and change orders to and modificatiolls of said Subcontract, and all other work, if any, performed by the undersigned on said project. 1. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, with respect to all of such work: A.) All labor employed thereon or in connection therewith and all payroll taxes and charges such as Withholding Taxes, Social Security Taxes, and Workers' Compensation, Disability and Unemployment Taxes andlor Insurance Premiums and all applicable union fringe benefits have been paid in full. B.) All materials, tools, equipment, supplies and services furnished and used upon or in connection with said work have been paid for in full, and all sales, use, excise and similar taxes on or in connection willi the sam;;; have been fully paiJ. 2. The undersigned hereby releases an~ forever discharges the Contractor, the Owner (as identified in said P.O.lSubcontract), their respective sureties, if any, and all lands, improvements, chattels and other real and personal property connected with or a part of said project from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien whatsoever arising out of said P.O.lSubcontract and/or said work and which it now has or hereafter might or could have. 3. The undersigned will, at its sole cost and expense, forever defend and hold harmless the Contractor and the said Owner from any and all claims and demands and will defend against and obtain the discharge of any and all liens, claims of lien and notices to withhold payment made by others arising out of or in connection with said work, including, without limitation, those claimed or by any employee, supplier or subcontractor of the undersigned (or by any employee or supplier of a subcontractor of the undersigned), or by any governmental agency or insurance carrier. 4. In the'event that ány of the work pl:rfonried by the undersigned on said project (inchidingÎhe materials used or incorporated therein and the workmanship thereot) is the subject of any guaranty or warranty by the undersigned, neither the giving of this release and waiver of lien by the undersigned nor its acceptance by the Contractor shall operate in any way to reduce or modify such guaranty and warranty or to release the undersigned therefrom. The undersigned further agrees that if it hereafter performs any labor or furnishes any materials, tools, equipment, supplies or services pursuant to such guaranty or warranty, it will fully pay any and all taxes and charges in connection therewith and will release, discharge, defend and hold hannless the Contractor and Owner and the said lands, improvements, chattels, and other real and personal property from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien arising in connection therewith all in a like manner and to the same extent as it herein provided with respect to labor, materials, etc., heretofore furnished. This release and waiver of lien shall inure to the benefit of the Contractor, the Owner, and their respective sureties, successors and assigns and shall be binding upon the undersigned and its or their heirs, successors and assigns. Dated this ::J /J day of ,.¿It? V ,2001, at (SEAL) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: COMPANY: TITLE: (OFFICER OR OWNER) SUbscrib, ed ar:d sworn be~o" 'hi, ~ <by of ~~ ..J ¡:;? . I -;:::).. tl ~:¡¡.\'ti:k," '''i:'~RAPAUL ({ /aUaLLJ- ~_ ['~"J. . '-:;;"C!::::~UCC996731 Notary Public My Jnn;n.í~šiofl'~ '~~u.:.-.- ,2001 " ,",,'-~' r' 'D' r)'1~; '.' , " ·.J¡II , )," . ..' ! \ !' ~.....~ ~.~ \! ': \j'~ ~~t :',.; filla/releaulrr 2001·11-12 I?¡:-,., 'JIV~{) ·t/ . /ýo,~ -'¡ /.200j . \..-. FINAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIEN IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Thousand Two Hundred Fitftv-Seven Dollars and 50/100 Dollars ($1,257.50) to be paid to the undersigned by Adams Robinson Construction Co. hereinafter referred to as "Contractor," as full and fmal payment for all work required of and performed by the undersigned for the Contractor on that certain project known as St. Lucie Balin!! Facilitv in Ft. Pierce. FL including, without limitation, all work performed under in connection with Sub Contract No. A-2992 dated SeDtember 25. 2000. together with all additions, supplements and change orders to and modifications of said Subcontract, and all other work, if any, performed by the undersigned on said project. 1. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, with respect to all of such work: A.) All labor employed thereon or in connection therewith and all payroll taxes and charges such as Withholding Taxes, Social Security Taxes, and Workers' Compensation, Disability and Unemployment Taxes and/or Insurance Premiums and all applicable union fringe benefits have been paid in full. B.) All materials, tools, equipment, supplies and services furnished and used upon or in connection with said work have been paid for in full, and all sales, use, excise and similar taxes on or in connection with the same have been fully paid. 2. The undersigned hereby releases and forever discharges the Contractor, the Owner (as identified in said P.O.lSubcontract), their respective sureties, if any, and all lands, improvements, chattels and other real and personal property connected with or a part of said project from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien whatsoever arising out of said P.O.lSubcontract and/or said work and which it now has or hereafter might or could have. 3. The undersigned will, at its sole cost and expense, forever defend and hold harmless the Contractor and the said Owner from any and all claims and demands and will defend against and obtain the discharge of any and . .allliens, cl~ of lien and notices to withhold payment made by others arising out of or in connection with said work, including, without limitation, those daimed or by any employee, supplier or subcontractor of the undersigned (or by any employee or supplier of a subcontractor of the undersigned), or by any governmental agency or insurance carrier. .' 4. In the event that any of the work performed by the undersigned on said project (including the materials used or incorporated therein and the workmanship. there,of) is, the subject of any guaranty or warranty by the undersigned, neither the giving of this release and waiver of lien by the undersigned nor its acceptance by the Contractor shall operate in any way to reduce or modify such guaranty and warranty or to release the undersigned therefrom. The undersigned further agrees that if it hereafter performs any labor or furnishes any materials, tools, equipment, supplies or services pursuant to such guaranty or warranty, it will fully pay any and all taxes and charges in connection therewith and will release, discharge, defend and hold harmless the Contractor and Owner and the said lands, improvements, chattels, and other real and personal property from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien arising in connection therewith all in a like manner and to the same extent as it herein provided with respect to labor, materials, etc., heretofore furnished. This release and waiver of lien shall inure to the benefit of the Contractor, the Owner, and their respective sureties, successors and assigns and shall be binding upon the undersigned and its or their heirs, successors and assigns. Dated this c:?() day of YO Ý ,2001, at COMPANY: FING INC. (SEAL) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: (OFFICER OR OWNER) ~a·· däY~../ ,2001 . My Com ! . Notary Public jinalreleaselrr 2001-11-12 .-.--"-~ I .~~~ ~bAI 'fOp . IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Six Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars and 70/100 Dollars ($628.70) to be paid < IJ to the undersigned by Adams Robinson Construction Co. hereinafter referred to as "Contractor,· as full and final </i?¡ payment for all work required of and performed by the undersigned for the Contractor on that certain project known as St. Lucie Baling Facility in Ft. Pierce. FL including, without limitation, all work performed under in connection with Sub Contract No. A-2998 dated October 17. 2000. together with all additions, supplements and change orders to and modifications of said Subcontract, and all other work, if any, performed by the undersigned on said project. '-' FINAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIEN / ¡ 1. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, with respect to all of such work: ~ 11 labor employed thereon or in connection therewith and all payroll taxes and charges such as ithholding Taxes, Social Security Taxes, and Workers' Compensation, Disability and ~ nemployment Taxes and/or Insurance Premiums and all applicable union fringe benefits have been ¡ aid in full. 11 materials, tools, equipment, supplies and services furnished and used upon or in connection with 2. The undersigned hereby releases and forever discharges the Contractor, the Owner (as identified in said P.O.lSubcontract), their respective sureties, if any, and all lands, improvements, chattels and other real and personal property connected with or a part of said project from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien whatsoever arising out of said P.O.lSubcontract and/or said work and which it now has or hereafter might or could have. 3. The undersigned will, at its sole cost and expense, forever defend and hold harmless the Contractor and the said Owner from any and all claims and demands and will defend against and obtain the discharge of any and all liens, claims of lien and notices to withhold payment made by others arising out of or in connection with said work, including, without limitation, those claimed or by any employee, supplier or subcontractor of the undersigned (or by any employee or supplier of a subcontractor of the undersigned), or by any governmental agency or insurance carrier. 4. - In the event that any of the work perfo~ed by the undersigned on said project (including the- materials used or incorporated therein and the workmanship thereof) is the subject of any guaranty or warranty by the undersigned, neither the giving of this release and waiver of lien by the undersigned nor its acceptance by the Contractor shall operate in any way to reduce or modify such guaranty and warranty or to release the undersigned therefrom. The undersigned further agrees that if it hereafter performs any labor or furnishes any materials, tools, equipment, supplies or services pursuant to such guaranty or warranty, it will fully pay any and all taxes and charges in connection therewith and will release, discharge, defend and hold harmless the Contractor and Owner and the said lands, improvements, chattels, and other real and personal property from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien arising in connection therewith all in a like manner and to the same extent as it herein provided with respect to labor, materials, etc., heretofore furnished. This release and waiver of lien shall inure to the benefit of the Contractor, the Owner, and their respective sureties, successors and assigns and shall be binding upon the undersigned and its or their heirs, successors and assigns. Dated this / ¿ 1:Ç! day of '1(~~ , 2001, at ...::1.1 /Za""u,r? , 7' Æ . COMPANY: D & D TILE COMPANY 1~t dA.J ~~ Á~,~ TITLE: (OFFICER OR OWNER) J u./J~ / . Subscribed and sworn before me this /h rh day of '71~ "".lIlt'l: M . MM - ~¡¡r.r:'-:~'" crgle , cy hi "~~ MY COMMI3SION .. C08211 a eXPIRES ~ : : ~ '.. . o'f.'> . BONÐED WU TlõOvFoIIN INSUl1ANC~ I~C. .. mmlSSlon J::xplres (SEAL) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: ,2001 /?J. ., ) 7J;. /?t Notary;r / Jilla!re!ease!lr 200/-1l -07 '-' FINAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIEN ~ '- r// " IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Thousand Three Hundred Eil!htv-Five and 00/100 Dollars ($1,385.00) to be paid tq the undersigned by Adams Robinson Construction Co. hereinafter referred to as "Contractor," as full and fmal payment for all work required of and perfonned by the undersigned for the Contractor on that certain project known as' St. Lucie BaIine Facilitv in Ft. Pierce.FL including, without limitation, all work performed under in connection with ~ub Contract No. A-3013 dated Januarv 3. 200!. together with all additions, supplements and change orders~o ãÌidïñooifica.dóns·of sajd Subcontract, and all oth~~ work, if any, perfonned by the undersigned on said project. ' : ,',;,':',-,; ..,.... . '",.,,' ::-':'c,,' " , 1. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, with respect to all of such work: All labor employed thereon or in connection therewith and all payroll taxes and charges such as Withholding Taxes, Social Security Taxes, and Workers' Compensation, Disability and Unemployment Taxes anellor Insurance Premiums and all applicable union fringe benefits have been paid in full. AH materials, tools, cqu:p:ru:nt, supplies ~..d services furnished and used upon or in connection with said -;:"ork have be::::. p:::d ~'()r i::. f.:l!. a¡ld :.11 ~al::s. use. excise and similar taxes on or in connecl1on with the same have been fully paid. 2. The undersigned hereby releases and forever discharges the Contractor, the Owner (as identified in said P.O.lSubcontract), their respective sureties, if any, and all lands, improvements, chattels and other real and personal property connected with or a part of said project from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien whatsoever arising out of said P.O.lSubcontract and/or said work and which it now has or hereafter might or could have. A.) B.) 4. 3. The undersigned will, adts sole cost and expense, forever defend and hold harmless the Contractor and the said Owner from any and all claims and demands and will defend against and obtain the discharge of any and all liens, claims of lien and notices to withhold payment made by others arising out of or in connection with said work, including, without limitation, those claimed'or by any employee, supplier or subcontractor of the undersigned (or by any employee or supplier of a subcontractor of the undersigned), or by any governmental agency Of insurance .:arrier. .. '., In the eve~t that any of the work perforIÍ1ed by the undersigned on said' p¡ojeci (including the materials used or incorporated therein and the workmanship thereof) is the subject of any guaranty or warranty by the undersigned, neither the giving of this release and waiver of lien by the undersigned nor its acceptance by the Contractor shall operate in any way to reduce or modify such guaranty and warranty or to release the undersigned therefrom. The undersigned further agrees that if it hereafter perfonns any labor or furnishes any materials, tools, equipment, supplies or services pursuant to such guaranty or warranty, it will fully pay any and all taxes and charges in connection therewith and will release, discharge, defend and hold harmless the Contractor and Owner and the said lands, improvements, chattels, and other real and personal property from any and all claims, demands, liens and claims of lien arising in connection therewith all m a like manner and to the same extent as it herein provided with respect to labor, materials, etc., heretofore furnished. t. This release and waiver of lien shaH inure to ¡he ÍJenefit uf tÌle Contracwr, ¡he Own.:r, and ¡hei¡ n:spe.:tive ;,ult:,it:s, successors and assigns and shall be binding upon the undersigned and its or their heirs, successors and assigns. IJ ...µ.., Dated this day of P1û~ , 2001, at (SEAL) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: i~ I' 2001 H~ I J. [. ~ I rll~\.:ì LJU U D ~) COMPANY: é>-"< ð ...~ /" {X/'~ ( (Y1Qj ______________u________. TITLE: (OFFICER OR OWNER) Subscribed and sworn before me this 4 ~·.a~ Notary Public day of . ,2001 My Commission Expires .....~':..", REBECCAJ. ACOSTA f~:.¡r·..~;~ M'I COMMISSION ~ CC 866963 :*: .;~5 EXPIRES: August 26, 2003 .' ",: Bandtd ihN Nata!"! PuCl~ UndlfWTl"" flnalreleaselrr 2{)()]-05 ·0] 1~~JU'~UU1 1U:J1 --- . ¡',....I <ô1 ï~5~1)~1 Ru.\ KE.\IHLL ..... K. \wr FINAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIEi'i ...,I tllllJl ¡ "- ¡IN CONSIDERATI<?N of [h.: sum ufNin!: Th()us\\nd Thrce. Hundred "-ort.v-onc OolhlN '!lid OO/IOU OOllaa "'J59.J4 I.!III) to h.: palll [0 thc under~lgned by Adams Rnh,"~nn C':nnstfUcnon Co h--':-" <., . - "Cnmr:¡clUr.· :IS fuH ..n<.l rin~1 p¡¡ymcnt for all work requirell of JJ1U performed by [hc unllc! Iln rh;u c':I1:lÏn projcct known as St. Lucie Balin!!: Facilitv in Ft. Pierce. rL including. wi ¡x:rfmm.:d under in connection with Sub Contract No. '\-2965 dated Áuau.'it [0. 201)1). IC .iupplements anù change oeders to and moditicarions of s;¡id Subcontr:lcr. and all ocher we the undersigned on said project. ·"THIS REI F..ASE IS CONTINCENT UPON RECEIPT AND CLEARANCE OF A CHECK IN TIŒ AB l. TH E UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PEPJ'L'RY T of such work: 5~~ ~ ¿/4:. ;?J \ 2. All labor cmployed thcreon or in connection therewith and all payroll t¡¡xes ¡¡nd charges such as Withholùing Ta:<es, Soci:JJ. Security Taxes, and Workers' Compensation. Disability and Unemployment Ta;I;cs :J.l1d/or £nsw:ance Premiums ;u¡d all ¡¡pplicable union fringe benefits have been paid in fUll. All mac.eriaJ.s. tools. equipment. supplies and Scrvic~ ~ù iiIld used upon or in CQMo:cuon "'ien said work have been paid for in run. and all sales, WlC. excise and simi!:rr axes on or in connection with the same have been (ully paid. The undersigned hereby releases and. , (orever discharges the Contractor, the Owner (as identified in sö1id P .O.lSUbcOtltrõlCt), their respective sureties. it' any. and alll.aJJds.. improvemel1ts. ch:l1!Cls and omer real iUld pe~on.aJ ~~?~ COlmected wim or a part of said project from my and all claiIns, dernaIld.s. üens and claims of lien w ver arising out of said P.O./Subconrract and/or siÛd work and which it now has OT hereafter might or could have. e.) A.) 4. The unde~i !;1lCd wiIl:-at its sole cost and expense. forever defend and hold harmless the ContraCtor and the said Owt1er 1Tom any and a.ll claims and demands and will defend against and obtain the dischargc of any and all liens. cl:úm.s of lien and notices to withhold paymetl[ IMde by others arising out of or in connection with said work. including. without limitation. tho.sc claimed or by any employee. supplier or subcontractor of ttle undersigned (or by a.ny employee or supplier of a subcontr1lctor of the W1dersigned), or by any governmental agency or insurance ~rricr. In rhe event that any of the worX performed by the undersigned on s:1id project (including the materials used or incorporated therein ö1nd the worlanilIlSh~p thereof) is the subjcct of any guaranty or warranty by the undersigned. neither the givin¡ of this release and w:1iver of lien by the undersigned nor its ~cccpt3Jlee by thc Contractor shall operare in any way to reduce or modify such guar:mty and warr.mty or to release the undcrsignecl therefrom. The undersigDcd further agrccs that if it hereafter performs any I¡¡,~or '?' furnishes ó1ny materials. tools. equipment. supplies or services pursu:mt to such guo¡r:uu:y or warranty. It wtll fully pay :tny aod all ta.~es and ch:1r2es in co=ction ther!:With and will release, discharge. defend and b.old h;¡rmlcss the Contractor and Owt1er~and the said lands. improvements. ch¡¡,ue[s. and other rea1 and personal property from any and all claims. dcrTWIds. liens IInd claims of lien ;¡rising in connection therewith all In a like manner ö1nd to the same c:\tent as it herein provided with respect ro labor. materials, erc.. heretofore Furnished. J. This rc[e:1Sc IInd waiver u[ licI\ ~itali inure Ii) the bClleÜl i)f the Com!,:1I.;toe. tL.c O"'I"1"r. a!ld ¡heÎL' rcspcl.:LÍv-: sun:lic:s, successors and assigns and stull ~ binding upOn the undersigned and its or their heirs. successors ¡¡nd assigns. Darcd this fJ.Cj day of Aio V . 200l. at \V p~ "FL J (SEAL) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: ?Nn1'''$/,~? Ron Jl~nða!!, President Ron KèDdali :.:":~soary, InÐ. {~~ .2ool COMPANY: TITLE: (OFFICER OR OWNER) day of My COI \ liul/lr¡-/clI,~"'f1' ~tJ()I·1 / 07 11 "~n' "(1(1 I ,,'or 111'?- [T"( /1/"( '.') ö75ö I Date: 12f.13/2001 02:27 PM Sender's Fax ID: 937-228-9108 Page 2 of 3 '-" ...." ACORD. CERTIFICA TE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE . CSR JR I DATE {MMlDOIYY ADAMR1C 12/13/01 lRODUCI! I ,~ THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE Brower Insurance Agency,P.L.L. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR P.O. Box 37 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Dayton OR 45401 Phone: 937.228.4135 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED INSUJ;¡ER "- Cincinnati Insurance Company ADAMS-ROBINSON ENTERPRISES INC ADAMS-ROBINSON ~RPRISES OF INSUReR 8: The TraveJ.ers FLORI~ INC; MA l!'H PROPERTIES American Int'J. Company LTD~ 0 ELECT CAL CONTRCTS INSURER c: 273 NEEDMORE ROAD INSURER D DAYTON OH 45414 I INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED eELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ÞN'f REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES, AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS, INSR TYPE OF INIIURANCE "'OUCY NUMBER oÃ'Î',¡"o.;;;:,DiŸŸ,· . ·~~~'=WDM-'Y} LTA UMm! ~EIW. UABIUTY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000. A :I: COMMEJ:;'CIAL GENERAl UABIUTY CPP0698318 04/01/99 04/01/02 FIRE Q.IM¡6J)E (Any one nre) $ 500,000. I ClAIMS MADE W OCCUR MEa EXP (AAy one person) $ 10,000. r-!- OHIO STOP GAP CPP0698318 04/01/99 04/01/02 PERSONAl.. &ADV INJURY $ 1,000, 000 . GeNERAL AOOREGA TE $ UNLIMITED. f-- GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APFUES PER PRODUCTS· COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000. h POLICY n ~~& n LOC AUTOMOBILE UABIUTY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT - $ 1,000,000. A ..!.. ANY AUTO CPP0698318 04/01/99 04/01/02 iEa attiCJentj ALL OWNED AUTOS BODIL. Y INJURY - $ SCHEDULED AUTOS (Perper30n) - ..!.. HIRED AUTOS BOOIL Y INJURY $ ~ NON--O'WNED AUTOS (Per accident) ..!.. COMP DED $1,000. ~Iõ!OPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) , :I: COLL DED $1,000. caRADE UASIUTY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT , =1- AUTO OTHER THAN EAACC , . AuTO ONLY ,",0 $ EXCESS UAIIIUTY EA.CH OCCURRENCE , 10,000, 000 . A :!J OCCUR o CLÞJMS MADE CCC4437B08 04/01/99 04/0J./02 AGGREGATE , 10,000,000. , =1 DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION s N/A , x: I :;'ciR~T ~~~s I 10TH- WORKERS COMPENSATION ANO ER C EMPLOYERS' UABIL1TY WC9386240 03/29/01 03/29/02 E_L_ EACH ACCIDENT , 1,000,000. E L DISEÞ.SE - EA EMPLOYEE '1,000,000. _ E_L DISEASE - POUCY UhllT S 1,000,000. OTHER A W. VA EMPLYRS LIAB CPP0693818 04/01/99 04/01/02 LIMIT $100,000. B EQUIPMENT FLOATER QT660290D5651 04/01/00 04/01/02 RENT/LEAS $400,000. OESCRlPTlON OF OPERATlONB/I,OCATlONSNEHICLEIlEXCLUIIONI ADDED BY ENDO~IEMENT/IPECIAl. PROVlIIONS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA AND CAMP, DRESSER " MCKEE, INC AND THEIR CONSULTANTS ARE INCLUDED AS ADDITIONAL INSUREDS WITH RESPECTS TO PROJECT: ClASS I SOLID WASTE BAILING FACILITY " ADMINSTRATOR BUILDING, GLADE S RD. LANDFILL; OCP POLICY: NAMED INSURED ARE ADDITIONAL INSUREDS NAMED ABOVE, POLICY #TBD, 06/02/00-01, LIMIT $1,000,000, CINCINNATI INS CO. CERTIFICATE HOLDER I N I ADDmoNAI. INIURID: INSURlR LITTIR: CANCELLATION STLUCIE SHOULD ANY OF THI! ABOVe DESCIUIID lOUCIISII CANCIu..D B.PORI THI! I!X lIRATlON ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA DATE THEREO', THIIIIUINO INSURER WILL ENDEAVO~ .JlJ..Q... DAYS WRITTEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI S S lONERS NOTICE TO THE CERT1FICAT& HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAlWRE TO o~ " CAMP DRESSER " MCKEE, INC. IMPOSE NO OBUOAT1ON OR UAalUTY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, rrs AGENTS OR 1701 ST. RD. A-1-A, STE 301 VERO BEACH FL 32963 RIPftl.INTATlVII. AUTHORIZED REP'ftESENTATlVE I John L. Watson ACORD 25-S (71971 "'ACORD CORPORATION 1988 12/13/2001 THU 15:31 [TXlRX NO 71141 \w; """ Page 3 \ \ PAGE 2 PATE 12/13/01 \ Dale: 12/1312001 02:27 PM Sender's Fax 10: 937-228-9108 ·NOTEPA[):<»~~~~·;°J:.,i:>~~:~~täsÓN EmJi:IilPí&SESINC THE NAMED INSURED CLAUSE INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO INCLUDED: ADAMS-ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION ......~~c .. ·tSRJR 12/13/2001 THU 15:31 [TX/RX NO 71141 AGENDA REQUEST ITEM ~ C-7B DATE: January 22, 2002 '" REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: (XX) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works Dept./Solid Waste Division SUBJECT: Staff requests the Board of County Commissioner's approve the sole source purchase to Sierra International for two (2) Safetech Conveyor Safety Systems in the amount of $45,700, and Equipment Request No. EQ02-183. BACKGROUND: This equipment is a safety system that will shut the conveyors and balers down if an employee wearing a Safetech Personnel Detector Belt passes a sensor system. This systems is now mandatory on all baling units being sold in Europe due to a recent incident that resulted in a fatality. The System comes with two (2) Safetech Conveyor Safety Receiver Boxes with Transmitters, eight (8) Safetech Personnel Detector Belts, Stop Cables, installation and training. This item would be a sole source purchase from Sierra International because it must be compatible with the baling system in place. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Account # 401-3410-564000-300. Funds are available in the Equipment Account due to the deletion of a budgeted piece of equipment (EQ02-140). PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioner's approve sole source to Sierra International, approve Equipment Request No. EQ02-183, and the purchase of two (2) Safetech Conveyor Safety Systems in the amount of $45,700. o County Attorney: ,(Þ: Review and Approvals 181 Management and Budget: (fN ~ I\A 0181 Purchasing: COMMISSION ACTION: 1J APPROVED o OTHER: o DENIED ~ 181 Originating Dept: (Pub. Wks.) 181 Other: (Landfill) o Other: o Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: cn 0:: WN Zo O~ ëñ't"" !!2g :ENN ::Eo::e Oc(N UW~ ~~C; Zc(W :)U~ O!!2c Uu.1- ~~æ cu.:) 0::1-0' c(cnw OWo:: m:)c( >O'c I-WZ Zo::W :)I-C) OZc( UW W::E -Q. U- :):) ..JO' ,W I- cn ë w Q Z w ::E ::E o u w a:: ~ a::: ~ ü ::¡ § a.. ¡:.: z w ::E ~ < Q, W Q o ~ (ß >= ë w ~ a:: Q, Q, < ~ CI) ~ 9 -.I o CI) CI) ~ ¡...:: ~ CI) ~ ~ ~ a::: ~ ~ ~ o ü Q ~ ~ ~ .i!a c:: ~ "0 ::::: ~ ¡¡¡ ~ ~ ~ "6 >.. ~ ~ ¡¡¡:!:: .... Q) ..c: .!!! ~ ~ .E . !! ,*8~c: ~ Q) ::¡ ~ .Q~g~ ~ .... Q) <\I <\I Õ".S!! <lJC;j..c:.E <\I <6 .!¿ ~ .~ ..c: ~ .... <IJ - S Q) EàïE§- ~ ~ ~ "'- .~ E !/) ::¡ .S!! CI) :;.. I.iJ .t: c: <IJ c:: ¡...:: !II Q) .- .Q ..c: '0 (/} "tJ ..... 0 ..; c:: § <IJ "* <\I ~ <IJ ~ð'O~ (5.Q~-w :s.......::; ~ ~ ~ 0 <IJ c: .Q) á. 0> 8 \,) .s; ~:I@¡¡¡ Q)<\IQ).Q ..c:: .Q::::::: -:: .J::: ..... «J .e~~§ <IJ (I) Q) ~ E t: ~ 0 ~ !2 <\I .... ~s !I>{g CI)(I)"'-c: E Q) <\I .QQ)~E ~ 1iS ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ..c: c:: ... .~ 0> <IJ ~ ~ ::¡ .- .... e E ~ 0..: ..c: Q) c:: ........ o 8 ~ ~ ü <;:: ì ) (I) ..c: 0> ¡;¡ .~ ~ .!:; Q, ~ .... & "= ~ :.;:; Q) ...: ~Q).Qo :5 <\I .g ¡:;¡- c:: 0> 0> '- 0 .§ .!:; ~ (I) <\I c¡, .... æ ~ ~ ~~Q)Q) ctJ"aq,;S "ê E ~ c:: ::¡ Q) õ.. 0 Q,..... E 0> o 0 Q) .!:; ....:5 c::-t: .~ <\I (II 0 C;j ~ c:: :: Q)-Q)(I) ::¡ .¡g ~ æ 0- c: ;>. ::... ~~ ~.!2 .~ ï3 j1 ~ ~ ~ 1! Q) c c ~ c ~ It) 6 ..... ~ I ..... C "I" ~ W a:J ::E :) Z I- Z :)ho u ~ ~ ..... I ~ ß ¡:.: z :) o ::E < I- W C) Q :) z o ~ u ¡¡: ~ :) 8 w a:: I- z W :¡¡ Q, :5 a w Dee 14 01 C3:24 Natasha Scarborou~h 817-337-5838 p.2 '-' ." SIERRA INTERNATIONAL MACHINERY INC. -.." , . -'. ._ ~_.:o ..~. - '- -'I.:': _____ _~ ,¡roo 1620 EAST BRUNDAGE LANE (93307) P,O. BOX 1340 BAKEë1SFIELD CALIFORNIA. 93302 661-327-7073· FAX 661-322-8:59 USA 800-343-8503 STATE LICENSE # 770603 BAlER ¡ LOGGERS PORTABLE OR STATIONARY SHEAR! BALER / LOGGERS MACPRESSE BALERS & MRF's SERI/ICE & PARTS ,.. Friday, December 14,2001 Mr, Leo Cordeiro St. Lucie County Solid Waste Authority 6120 Glades Cut-Off Road Ft. Pierce, FL 34981 Re: Safety System Dear Leo: Please pardon my tardiness in responding to your request for a proposal on our Safety System. As you know, the end of the year has been most busy and for that we are grateful. I have requested that Bill Ermel provide a safety training session for your staff regarding the proper methods to access points that could be dangerous. We will show a videotape prepared by ISRI, which should get the point across that unsafe actions can be fata!. Pricing is as follows: Two (2) Safetech Conveyor Safety Systems Eight (8) Safetech personnel detector belts ....... One (1) detector belt test unit - Stop cables from each control box to the "E" stop circuits Two (2) factory engineers to perform installation and training 80% of the installation can be completed without stopping the equipment Delivered and Installed $46.700.00 Terms: 50% deposit with order, 40% due at start-up, balance due within 15 days. Delivery: 8-10 weeks from receipt of order with deposit. The system requires an annual service inspection. Detector belts will be replaced annually as needed, . www.5ierraintl.com ~ Fnnt::.d -:)1"1 10rJ~ :eCtC,etJ C'aµ~r Dee 14 01 03:24 '-' Natasha Searborou~h 817-337-5838 """" p.3 Additional brochures and videos further describing this system have been requested. I will be on vacation December 171h thru 21 st. Jf you need me please call me on my cell phone. cc: Joe Droukas John Sacco Ron Roberts www..sierrClintl.com ~ Prr:ec (;(1 10c.;,~ re::::YG1t:;d, c..:::.;r Dee 14 01 03:2" '-' Natasha Scarborough 817-337-583P ...." p.4 Designed to safeguard hazardous access points and conveyors leading to danget"ous machinery. ThIS unIqUe system sal'e2Uards pcrw...d by ..... of a tnonsmia:.. which ....110 . radio sipl formin¡¡ a ~ field acr<>1$ cMl«es:I to be guanIod. All pononnel within 1M danter 11'11& .... rec¡ulred to ...... a b81t corwainlnø _ transceivers (tiIp) In hi&h .ìsibllily pouch... Th_ ....IJafnwolgh.,..,d euy to -.: \lYhen .... opemar ~ the masnetk roald !he tnIn_Nen are entad and ..-m ...... own .õønll CD rKlÏYers '*'*' at .acto Side of !he --. to be..arCed. The li¡nIi i. MI1t u> !he Safe1leCh conIroI box and Werfaœd wtm \he .....'J""CY aop drcult of the mKhlner')'. At !he same time ., seoppIrIc the m8Chinery, exœmoI IIIorms In!! _tided. Should the cperal<>r be -.1dnl alone In a remota pan of the foaory. me facility Is dMre to send a sIt'1II I aIorm IX> a control ..-.... or security post. Advantages of the Safetech S)'5tem - · Thearl7_ lhI101fe,,, pr-.Ior_ "'" -...In IorwI- · rr-.ID.......... """ ........ - or tn I IOd -- · u......__. SaI-... aI III'ior..... 011_ ......._now of - &Ion¡....-...,.. .I..........ar_ tnnImblktrl Of' .....1U"'f"tI: IÞ. ~"fMIAf. · Tho nono.c.-... ..._. ;~L~' J"'" Tho syDm has numerous ñI.sæe dlNlcet and is appruoed by .... 'Swedish Plant 1Npe<<Onte'. This ¡ppravaI Is ~ by 1tIe H.5.E (SA). We beii_ Ihet ...r S)'OUm ÎI the only """ oIferinø prorealOn Þ> the unCDlBdoo. or ~ ............. Also **- .1 the IWah visibiity f"'IJ<hM ò:II1t3Ining 11>0 tip. it I' .....1y ~fiod InI ealorœG. An hsalled ~ comprloes 01:. 1hnsmiøer/F,dl-Safe cootrol unit woh otond. Innsmk aerial and lrome. two receM:r antema. person.... belts and one personnel bolt ched< un~ _/' -'. .'" .... :;;;;':' -I.,,,,' , . . -. .:. I \'i/: All operatiyes " "I,' ..~mt~ r'J! ~I'M,; ''',".11,''1:1')' ~ofUO[tt" &:t ~~. s......, '''''"'^t'~ ~t.·Iac. t~\¡.1· .41 'n¡r-o¡, ,~..N;~ ." Ope....tìna Area 1~r- n',1C"""'erv o:JI,,-*t oe '\o(.II'U·~1 fI1""~'. ~ <o(_h ~~h"" "'. <Jp~r¡U·r~ ~,,~. ~~,,;,_r (~) n¡¡n-.e:-r;4 f:ai{1.1Þ CC\'k.U artd ~ -'Pp'û.,...f~'I"r;"\o!~";~PI.",: Ir\f>C'U~~ 1ht\ ~ç"a' I.. t.o:m.lln~hy ol.I·~ L. ¡'}.þ '\. Tranønltter 3 Mene Prouaea ZODe \..- AGENDA REQUEST ..., ITEM NO. c.- 7C- DATE: January 22, 2002 CONSENT [X REGULAR TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works [ SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL. : PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [ XI [ ] APPROVED OTHER: County Attorney: Originating Dept: Finance: (copies only): ~ Authorize the submittal of one grant application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Recreational Trails Program to assist with the construction of Lakewood Park Recreational Path. In addition, authorize the County Administrator to sign the grant application. Although this program is funded through the Federal Highway Administration, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection administers the grant funds. A public meeting was noticed in the paper and held on January 15, 2002 to discuss this proj ect. In addition, this project was discussed at the regularly scheduled Recreation Advisory Board meeting and at the Lakewood Park Property Owners Association. All attendees agreed that this is a worthwhile project to construct a safe separated multi-use trail facility along King's Highway north of the intersection of Turnpike Feeder Road. The grant application will be for $80,000 and the County has matching funds of $80,000 already allocated for the Lakewood Park Recreational Path Account Number 101002-4112-4906. The BOCC recently approved the contract to build the first phase of the trail. The funds from this grant will assist with the second phase of the trail including installation of pedestrian bridges. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator to sign the grant application and authorize staff to submit the grant application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Recreational Trails Program. DENIED Purchasing : Other: Mgt & Budget: Public Works: Ag'eGTFAIR.doc ~ ~ PART II - PROJECT INFORMATION N f P ·ect Lakewood Park Recreation Path 1. ame 0 roJ : 2. Project Location: (Show on DOT county road maps or USGS 7 Y2 minute quadrangle sheets): Tab as "Exhibit B" Street Address: Kings Highway City: Fort Pierce County: St. Lucie County Beginning point: Turnpike Feeder Road Ending point: North Boulevard 3. Ownership (If more than one owner, attach a list of owners and their agents along with a map clearly showing the location of each ownership). Site control issues must be resolved by the close of the submission period (January 31, 2002). Include a boundary map of the project site. Tab as "Exhibit C" Include a copy of site control documents (e.g. deed, lease agreement, etc.) Tab as "Exhibit D" Owner: St. Lucie County Owner's Agent: Address: 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Address: Phone: (561 ) 462-1400 Phone: ( 4. U.S. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS IN WHICH THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED: These should be the district in which the project site is located. If you are not sure of the district, contact your local office of the Supervisor of Elections. Mark Foley U.S. Representative's Name: U.S. House District Number: 16 OGT-10 Page 5 of 20 ....... ..".; 5. STATE LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS IN WHICH THE PROJECT IS LOCATED: These should be the district in which the project site is located. If you are not sure of the district, contact your local office of the Supervisor of Elections. State Senator's Name: Bill Posey State Senate District Number: 15 State Representative's Name: Stan Mayfield State House District Number: 80 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Briefly describe the proposed project. Incfude physical characteristics of the site, such as land resources, vegetation, fish and wildfife, historical, archaeological resources, previous land usage and transportation access as welf as a description of proposed project activities. If the project is an equipment purchase, describe the equipment, how it will be used to benefit recreational trails (include where it will be stored, who will maintain it, proposed projects for its use and the land managing agency on whose property equipment will be used). TEXT MUST FIT IN SPACE PROVIDED. The proposed project is a 2-mile trail from Turnpike Feeder Road to North Boulevard. The trail will be 10 feet wide and asphalt paved. It will extend adjacent to Kings Highway on the east side of the trail and the Lakewood Park Drainage Canal on the west. The trail will serve as a link between the Lakewood Park Elementary School; Lakewood Park branch of the St. Lucie County Library; the Lakewood Park Community Center; Indrio Crossing Shopping Center; and the Lakewood Park Recreation Area, a county park containing an exercise trail, tennis courts, basketball courts, baseball field, soccer field, multi-purpose field, playground, and picnic area. Three pedestrian bridges are proposed along the alignment to allow crossing of the drainage canal by recreational path users. The bridges will provide access to the trail from residential areas, As part of this project, a concrete sidewalk will be designed from the southernmost bridge to the Lakewood Park Elementary School. Students attending Lakewood Park Elementary School will benefit from the trail since it will provide the only pedestrian/bicycle-dedicated route to the school from residential areas to the east of the school. Each of the facilities noted above is immediately contiguous to the trail/sidewalk. The Indrio Crossing Shopping Center contains a Winn Dixie Marketplace, a hardware store, two restaurants, an exercise gym, and a McDonalds Restaurant where many youths congregate. Customers of the shopping center will be able to use the path as a commuter route to these destinations. Two rest areas will be placed along the alignment of the trail. The rest areas will be composed of a concrete pad, trash receptacles, bench seating, and a small covered pavilion. The proposed path corridor is along Kings Highway. The area between the west edge-of-pavement of Kings Highway and the east top-of-bank of the adjacent drainage canal is a flat area approximately 35 feet in width that is mostly cleared. The flat area is generally a maintained area of grasses and small shrubs. On the south end of the project are several large oak and pine trees, which will not be disturbed. OGT-10 Page 6 of 20 '-" """ Recreational Trails Program Fact Sheet What is the Recreational Trails Program (RTP)? RTP is a competitive program which provides grants for projects that provide, renovate or maintain recreational trails, trailhead and trailside facilities. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 included the National Recreational Trails Fund Act (NRTFA) and established the National Recreational Trails Funding Program (NRTFP). The National Highway System Designation Act (NHS Act) of 1995 amended and revived the NRTFA. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21) amended the previous legislation and provided for six years of funding. Project proposals may address the following recreational trail interests: Motorized Trails Nonmotorized Trails Mixed-Use projects (either motorized, non motorized or both) What is a "Recreational Trail"? The federal legislation defines a recreational trail as follows: A thoroughfare or track across land or snow, used for recreational purposes including, but not limited to, such uses as bicycling, nordic (cross-country) skiing, day hiking, equestrian activities, jogging or similar fitness activities, trail biking, overnight and long distance backpacking, roller skating, in-line skating, dog sledding, running, snowmobiling, aquatic or water activity and vehicular travel by motorcycle, four-wheel drive or all terrain, off-road vehicles. How is RTP Administered? Florida's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) administers the program in coordination with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Who May Apply for RTP Funds? Municipal or county governments, state or federal governmental agencies, recognized state and federal Indian tribal governments, and organizations approved by the State. How Do I Apply? Applicants must submit a completed RTP Grant Application, during the submission cycle of January 2-31,2002. Applications must be postmarked no later than January 31, 2002. Applicants may submit only one application during the submission period. Applications must involve only one project site. \...r ..,,; What is the Maximum Grant Amount? The current maximum grant amount for mixed-use and non motorized projects is $80,000; for motorized projects it is $100,000. What are the Match Requirements? All grant awards must be matched. In your application you choose either 50:50, 60:40 or 80:20 match. The more match provided, the more points awarded. -'."- .. ."'~,,.- -- For example, with a $100,000 project, your match could be any of the following: Total Proiect Cost $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 RTP Grant $50,000 $60,000 $80,000 Local Match $50,000 $40,000 $20,000 What Can I use to Match a RTP Grant? Cash and/or In-kind services. NOTE: Federal agencies may match grant funds with federal funds up to 95% of total project cost. How are RTP Grants Awarded? Each application is reviewed to determine eligibility. The Office of Greenways and Trails, in consultation with the RTP Advisory Committee, evaluates each eligible application according to program policy and assigns a final score. Based on the scores, DEP prepares and submits a recommended priority list to the Federal Highway Administration for funding consideration. Who Do I Call for More Information? Alexandra H. Weiss Office of Greenways and Trails 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station #795 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Phone: (850) 488-3701 (Suncom 278-3701 ) Email: alexandra.Weiss@dep.stateJl.us - \.... AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. "-'t DATE: January 22, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: District 19 Medical Examiner Reappointment BACKGROUND: See attached letter from Mr. Heideman, Florida Department of Law Enforcement. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Consider staff recommendation to concur with the Medical Examiners Commission to recommend reappointment of Dr. Roger E. Mittleman, and authorize the County Administrator to complete and return the reappointment form to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. [ x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Approvals County Attorney, Management & Budget Purchasing, Originating Dept, Other: Other, Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eft, 5/96 "-' FDLE ..."" Florida Department of Law Enforcement Medical Examiners Commission James T. "Tim" Moore Commissioner January 7, 2002 ~~,\\J Mr. Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Dear Mr. Anderson: The gubernatorial appointment term of the District Medical E; Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Counties) will expire on July I, 20l Chapter IIG-5.004(2), the Medical Examiners Commission wi! the incumbent, Dr. Roger E. Mittleman, or other qualified candi. Medical Examiners Commission can make an informed decision, from you or your County Commission. The topic is scheduled for discussion at the 2002 Spring Medical E. such, it would be appreciated if your office would complete the enCJ send it back to this office by February 25, 2002. Please indicate you. the recommendation for Dr. Mittleman's reappointment. The Commi~ nominations of other qualified candidates, if submitted. For your convenience we have included a self-addressed, stamped enve you have any questions or if you wish to discuss your input, please feel Sincerely, James T. Moore Commissioner ~,¡~ Dale H. Heideman Forensic Coordinator DHH:jl Enclosures P.Q, Box 1489 Tallahassee, FL 32302 (850) 410-8600 http://www.fdle.state.fI.us I .~ ,j'" " f/ ~ V rjJ~ ¡ \' . f ~~#><O ~,,, V JAN I 0 ',-~"_ ~ .. .-.,- -- ._----:::\-¡ '. \." ,! 111 ¡:¡ 1 ì Li :;-1!i_C ._._~_.....,.~-_..- ,,-. ...""" Medical Examiners Commission Recommendation for Reappointment District 19 Dr. Roger E. Mittleman Favorable Unfavorable I do not wish to express an opinion on this matter. (If Favorable, please give suggestions for improvement. If Unfavorable, please give reasons for negative response.) Completed by: Signature: Date: Please Print Name: Form Sent To: Mr. Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Please return form to: Dale H. Heideman Forensic Coordinator Florida Department of Law Enforcement Post Office Box 1489 Tallahassee, Florida 32302 ~ AGENDA REQUEST ..., ITEM NO. -E..::....9- DATE: January 22, 2002 CONSENT [X REGULAR ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ Quasi-JD. ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Mosquito Control PRESENTED BY: Jim David Director SUBJECT: Authorize the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners to sign the federal forms associated with the grant contract between St. Lucie County and the United States Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). In addition, approve the Interlocal Agreement and authorize the Chair of the BOCC to sign the Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and the St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District. The Interlocal Agreement will authorize the District to administer the Coastal Impact Assistance Program Grant for the Reintegration of Bear Point Mosquito Impoundment to the Indian River Lagoon. BACKGROUND: In the budget year 2001, Congress authorized the new Coastal Impact Assistance Program (ClAP) and earmarked $19.2 million dollars for Florida. Since the proposed project to restore wetlands for Bear Point is consistent with the ClAP program's goal to conserve, protect and restore wetlands, the Mosquito Control District wetland restoration project at Bear Point was awarded $63,273. Although the contract for the award identifies St. Lucie County as the recipient, the Interlocal Agreement will authorize the Mosquito Control District to complete the project and the reports to the agency. For that reason, staff recommends that the Chair of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners sign the grant contracts and other Federal forms associated with the grant award documents. In addition, approve and sign the Interlocal Agreement with St. Luc~e County to allow the District to manage this ClAP grant funded restoration project. FUNDS AVAIL. : No match is required for this grant application. PREVIOUS ACTION: On May 22, 2001, the BOCC authorized the submittal of a grant application to the Coastal Impact Assistance Program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Chair of the BOCC sign the ClAP grant award documents and sign the Interlocal Agreement with St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District to administer the Coastal Impact Assistance Program Bear Point restoration pr ject. [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED Purchasing: Other: COMMISSION ACTION: C~ty Attorney: ~riginating Dept: Finance: (k.. .-- ~ , '-" ..." UNITED STATES CEPARTMENT CF COMMERCE \. ; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration "ðzr-4ruo'f"'-# OFFICE OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION Coastal Impact Assistance Program Award Notification 2300 Virginia Ave Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 NOAA Award No. NA170Z2138 Accounting Code: 2ND3000/3A5BAF12/4113 Award Amount: $63,273 Award Period: 12/01/2001 - 11/30/2004 State ClAP Dated: August 1, 2001 . CFDA : 11.419 Access Code: 98978 RECIPIENT: St Lucie County This is a Coastallmpact'Assistance award. It represents an obligation of the Federal Government to provide financial assistance pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1356a. The Secretary of Commerce has reviewed and approved the State's Coastal Impact Assistance Plan (ClAP), which is incorporated by reference into this award. Amounts received by Producing Coastal States and coastal political subdivisions may be used only for the purposes specified in the Producing Coastal State's Coastal Impact Assistance Plan. Payment under this award will be sent by electronic funds transfer after receipt of the attached Vendor Profile form which can also be accessed at the following website http://www.rdc.noaa.gov/-acod/eftform.htm. The Vendor Profile Form must be completed and returned to the NOAA Finance Division before any transfer of funds can be made. This form can be faxed to that office at 301-427-3242 or 301-427-2035. In addition, we require the following enclosed documents to be completed and returned, if you have not already done so with this countersigned award document. Please complete the SF424B - Assurances or the SF424D - Construction Assurarices, and the CD511, Certifications Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; Drug Free Workplace Requirement and Lobbying. These documents as well as two copies of the Award Document (Grants and Finance Copy) must be returned to the NOAA Grants Management Division within 30 days. By signing this award notification letter, you agree to comply with the following provisions which are incorporated by reference: Department of Commerce Financial Assistance Standard Terms and Conditions; NOAA Special Award Conditions; OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Government; 15 CFR Part 24, Uniform Administrative Requirements for ~rants and Coop~rative Agreements to State, and l-<\ Local Governments, and OMS Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, ~__¡ and non-Profit Organizations. \ ,/ ¡o~~ (.Qo1"'~ Printeò on Recycled Paper E...10f <Ð .-.. ."J An annual progress report and Financial Status Report (SF-269) will be due 90 days after the anniversary date of your award, for the life of the award period (see attachments). Failure to submit any report may result in the suspension of the payments under this award Please be advised that you must keep this award document on file in accordance with 15 CFR Part 24.42. If the Government determines at any time that your application includes a false statement, the Government has the right to pursue any remedies allowed by law to recover the disbursed Federal Funds. The making of false statements may be subject to criminal penalties, including fine and/or imprisonment, under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 42 U.S.C. 3220. If you have any questions, please contact the NOAA Program manager for the technical issues or the NOAA Grants Management Specialist for administrative issues. NOAA Program Manager: Joshua Lott 301-713-3155 Josh. Lott@NOAA.GOV NOAA Grants Management Specialist: Alan Conway/Christine Brown 301-713-0922 1325 East-West Highway, 9th Floor Silver Spring, MD 20910 To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in the ClAP are true and correct. The document has been duly authorized by the government body of the applicant and the applicant will comply with the attached assurances if the assistance is awarded. Recipient Date O t1,1Q¡kJ{4- - Rimas T. Liogys NOAA Grants Officer nCf' 2 " l-'-' 7 Date 2001 Enclosed NOAA Special Award Conditions DoC Standard Terms and Conditions Vendor Profile Form Assurances CD511 SF269 RECIPIENT COpy RETAIN '-' ...., NOAA SPECIAL AWARD CONDITION 1. Award payment shall be made through the NOAA Financial Assistance Disbursement System (FADS). In accordance with 31 CFR 205 (Treasury Circular 1075 "1977"), the Recipient shall: (1) maintain procedures for fund control to ensure that drawndowns are made only when actually needed for its immediate disbursement needs; (2) comply with timely reporting of cash disbursements and balances as required. If the Recipient does not adhere to these provisions, NOAA may revoke the unobligated portion of the federal award funds. Instructions for use of the FADS are attached. FADS is an automated system that allow Recipients to request funds using a touch-tone telephone. FADS will record Recipients' requests and process them automatically, subject to review by NOAA officials. Once approved, funds will be directly deposited in the Recipient organization's bank account. See award letter for the access code. 2. NOAA has issued a Programmatic Environmental Assessment (EA) detailing the environmental impacts of NOAA's approval of the state Coastal Impact Assistance Program (ClAP) plans in 66 FR 57038. This EA is incorporated by reference. No funding, other than up-front planning and administrative costs, may be expended on any specific project identified in the EA as needing "further review" or consult under the Endangered Species Act, Magnuson-Stevens Act, or National Historic Preservation Act, until NOAA has completed the review of the specific project and informed the recipient in writing or electronic communication that the project may proceed. 3. This award supports the work described in the State's ClAP plan as referenced in the award notification letter and pursuant to guidance promulgated in 66 FR 51396 (10/09/01), and 66 FR 17151 (3/29/01). All of these are incorporated by reference. ..... ..""", 4. An annual Progress Report must be submitted to the Program manager within 90 days of the anniversary date of each grant year throughout the duration of the award. This report will be used to keep the program up to date on the recipient's progress. The report should address the following: (1) the status of each project, including accomplishments to date, estimated time for completion, and expiration for any anticipated delays. (2) any approved amendments and/or extensions to the ClAP plans; and (3) for completion projects, submittal of relevant work products (e.g. report data sets, links to on-line photographs, etc.). If some or all the funds have been deposited in a trust fund, the trust fund must report annually on the uses of those funds. The Annual Progress Report submitted after the award has expired will be considered the final report and is due 90 days after the expiration date. '-'" ..",., INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT TillS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of ,2002, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "County", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT, a special taxing district, hereinafter referred to as "District". WHEREAS, the County has been awarded a Coastal Impact Assistance Program grant by the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Award No. NAI70Z2138), hereinafter referred to as the "NOAA grant", for a project to assist in the reintegration of the Bear Point coastal wetlands into the Indian River Lagoon ecosystem, hereinafter referred to as the "Project"; and, WHEREAS, the Project will benefit the District's land management operations; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the projected benefit of the Project for mosquito control, the District is willing to assist the County in the financial and administrative responsibilities under the NOAA grant. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, Florida lnterlocal Cooperation Act. 2. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. The County shall execute an agreement with NOAA for the NOAA grant. The parties shall coordinate activities in the Project area in accordance with the MOD between the County and NOAA. 1- '-" ...., 3. DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES. The District shall provide oversight for the Project on behalf of the County. The parties shall coordinate Project activities in accordance with the terms of the MOD between the County and NOAA. 4. AMENDMENT. The Agreement may only be amended by a written document signed by all parties and filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida. 5. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon one hundred eighty (180) days prior written notice to the other party. 6. NOTICES. All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreet1).ent shall in writing (including telex and telegraphic communication) and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested, and addressed to: As to District: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Mosquito Control Director 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Building Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 As to County With a CODY to: County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Building Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Building Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered: (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date telecommunicated if by telegraph, ( c) on the date of transmission with 2- '-' ....I confirmed answer back if by telex, and (d) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the'notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 7. A UD IT. The County agrees that Distri ct or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the County involving transactions related to this Agreement. The District agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the District involving transactions related to this Agreement. 8. PUBLIC RECORDS. The County and the District shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by them in conjunction with this Agreement. 9. ASSIGNMENT. No party shall assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm \\ithout first obtaining the other parties' approval. 10. FILING. This Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, prior to its effectiveness. 11. GENERAL. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties, There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained therein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or 'Written, between the parties hereto. 3- \...- ...., IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized officials as of the dates below stated. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ATTEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQillTO CONTROL DISTRICT BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS COUNTY ATTORNEY g :\atty\agreemnt\interloc\mcd .noaa.02. wpd 4- \.,.. ...., This form is printable. When completed, please fax this form to 301-427-3242 or 301-427-2025. VENDOR PROFILE FORM '-F~"~'C ^'\'C"'~"'< l~I..1~ ('. " 7 ~ 1- ~ ~j"l',:,,_ ø~" ~'Î".'^~,TC,iç.~ The pUlpose of this form is to provide mandatory award and payment information for NOAA. This information is required as set forth in FAR 52.232-33, Mandatory Information for Electronic Funds transfer Payment, the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, and the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. NOAA will use the information only for the purposes stated in the references cited above and will restrict access to the data to authorized personnel who will use it only for the specified purposes. Until this information is received, our payment office will not make any payments. You, the vendor, are required to inform us of any banking changes that occur to ensure prompt payment of your invoices. Your payments may be delayed if the information you provide is not accurate. Please select one: _ New Vendor _ Change (complete bold areas, along w/ changes) Name: Legal Name Acronym or shortened name (8 characters long or less) What type of Vendor are you (select one): r: }s;i;?j~:~~:~;~~~ J3~.in:.ss J'-=[~~d;~;~ual'~"', '," ", ,....~. "', . "J'. :':~~er ~~al1'~:si~~;~" '" ".' ','. 'I fJr~t~telL~~;¡-G~;e~:~t~H~~~[-:- [o~i~t~~lLo_cal Cì()ve~.ent--~{~.~ ~;;g~B~~~~~~--- -- '--'. '-; .[-[~?~.~()~~~r()~t. :':g:.n.c~._,. ....... .: I--J ~()reign <:ontractor()i.<:orporation ¡r__IÌ'l0I1~ Pr.??t ()r~a-nizati()-;;---~~--~__'~' ;r-----:"'------- - ¡r-'; . ¡-;ï---·-------------···----··-·-·-: il.,.. .....'12~~~;i~~~:::c:::.~.e:f~~:~. ..ll..J ITr~~~!~ov~rnI11.e~t__,..".... il.........J l~~~~.o~.~~... .,....... ...... ....,.. ...... ....,.,. '.,. .,...J .J['] ~rivate "University -__ .... .... .. , ... .,..... ] [][N()I1~ProfitJ:lospital iLl ~~?~ral Go~~~~t . u.____._.__.~ T=,§'~te/~?c~]'~?~'t~~d~:~ti?n'.JIJ LJ ... .,_1 ~._-___.___.. . ''f.'r! .!.....,.._-.. I'·~r~·v _!!J Minority Owned and Operated Business Yes_No_ Woman Owned and Operated Business Yes_ No_ What is your Individual/Business/Organization's mailing address and point of contact? Name Address line I Address line 2 City State ZIP Country Phone Fax Internet E-mail address If p£',yment remit address is different than the mailing address, please provide it below: ! aD 11/27/2001 10:33 AM '-' ..""I Name Address line 1 Address line 2 City State Zip Country Phone Fax Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)* ':t--~--------_·_~-_·_~-_·_-----_·_·..·_·_----_·"-----------.--; ,.------~~----------~------....-,-.-~--- --"-.---.____~ !!:~~p~f~~~;~~i;tr;~~~~;:~~;;:y~~S) .. il._..m~.. ...............,. . ~IPar~llt.ç(H:!l:P~lly.~~!!!~;)ll<!.!!.~.~Il.!!!~e.r,.J!. ...mm_m........_... ... ....... ..... XíÞi':isioll~~ß.lJbllllit ~aDl; and TIN Number. ...... H===. '. ... ..... .....m .... ... ..--~___=--=-__- (!DÜNS # (commer~ial vendor--;;~Iy)--------I--·~~··--·---·-·-··------i '¡:. ff'~' -',- ..',e,·',,,,. ····w .·.""··..·_,__._'"·..,_^·.,,·."_.'·~m._,"".,,..' 'h_""-"~"'~"W·-.7;··~~;;;;;-··'···"-~·"·' .;;:;,.~.,.~~..r."_'"''''''_'_'''''_'";''''.~'~.''''' _......' I.._.:;:._;;-~.~... ;~."'---'p '-"'''~--;r-;;''''''"'- ""'..",'_. _____...,,~ ..._~. "'_"_",__..,. w.,... ..._ "'H. ow;. ~....__. _..__._...,...... '_'_.'.._'"' ä''''''__'''~ * The taxpayer Identification number is required by law. If you fail to provide us with this infonnation, your payments may be subject to income tax withholding. Type of Entity/Account applicable to the TIN (See Form W-9 Request for Taxpayer Identification Number & Certification, Specific Instructions Section). Select One: l' [1~~~:~~~~~::·=-~:,;-n~:~::~~~::-~f:Tf:in;:ocn~t (~~n;mn~ ... ~ [I ~~~~~~S;'lo/L"'1 1 !¡pnblic""ti"'---___ Hi lCß~n~__ _ . ... :11 j [J l~~.\l?~_~bl~.~~\liIl~~IlLl~~......Jl........ J ~.u~!?~~~Il ~c~t:fl1.fu~!· .... .._.. .. JL.J 1'I.al~~_I!ll.st/~~t~!e........_,_ ....... I [] ~m:tIl~rs~ip. .... .... .........._...._. IL... J [~..?~~..J:>!~pri~!~!sÈiE_..___._..._..JL_j l~_e<!.~!al GO\l~1"fl1"fl~l1t~ ... r]~;;~e~r~e~ist~r.:~ _. .l¡f:;~;:~:.~~~~~~--l[l Do you require payment in foreign currency? Yes_ No_ Currency type? Please indicate the type of products you provide to NOAA. Services Only Goods Only_Goods/Services_ The Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 mandates the use of Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) for ~ 00 11127/2001 10:33 AM all Federal payments ~eciPients who become eligible to receive such payments 90 ~s after enactment, which is July 26, 1996. Federal agencies must grant waivers for this mandate to recipients who certify in writing that they do not have an account with a financial institution. Please select one of the following payment methods: _ EFT (Automated Clearing House Payments (ACH» _ Check (must submit wavier in writing to the Finance Office, along with this form) If EFT was checked, please provide the following financial information for EFT payments. (The ACH Coordinator at your financial institution can supply you with this information) Financial Institution Name Address Zip City State ACH Coordinator Name Phone Nine Digit Routing/Transit Number (ABA#) Type of Account: (select one): I certify that the information which I have provided on this form is correct. Name (type or print) Title Phone # Signature Date: ~ of3 11/27/2001 10:33 AM FORM CD-511 (7-91) UNITE S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS AND LOBBYING Applicants sho~ld refer. to the :egulations ~ited bel~w to determine the ce~ification to which they a~e required. to attest Applicants should also review the mstructlons for certification mcluded m the regulations before completmg thIs form. Signature on this form provides for comp!!ance ,with certification requi~ements under 15 CFR Part 26, "Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) and 'Governmentwlde ReqUlrements for Drug-Free Workplace" and 15 CFR Part 28, "New Restrictions on Lobbying_" The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will bc placed when the Department of Commerce detennines to award thc covered transaction, grant or cooperative agreement 1. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS As requested by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, and implemented at 15 CFR Part 26, for prospective participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at15 CFR Part 26, Sections 26.105 and 26,110 - (1) The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property: (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1) (b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this ap- plication/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) W here the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. 2. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Alternate I. Grantees Other Than Individuals As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 15 CFR Part 26, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Sections 26.605 and 26.610 - A. The grantee certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the un- lawful manufacture, distribution. dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about-- (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace: (2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and em- ployee assistance programs; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be en- gaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will -- (1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; (e) Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to the Director, Office of Federal Assistance, Office of Federal Assistance and Management Support, HCHB Room 6054, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Notice shall include the identification numbers(s) of each affected grant; (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d) (2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted- (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; USCOMM·DC 91·7115 (g) Making a goo faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a). (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f), B. The grantee shall insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: Place of Performance: (Street address, city, county, state, ZiP code): Check 0 if there are workplaces on file that are not iden- tified here, Alternate II. Grantees Who Are Individuals As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 15 CFR 26, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Sections 26,605 and 26.610- (A) The grantee certifies that, as a condition of the grant, he or she wili not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribu- tion, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity within the grant; (B) If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, he or she will report the conviction, in writing, within 10 calendar days of the conviction, to the Director. Office of Federai Assistance, Office of Federal Assistance and Management Support, HCHB Room 6054, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. When notice is made to such a central point, it shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant. 3. LOBBYING As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U,S. Code, and implemented at 15 CFR Part 28, for persons entering into a grant, cooperative agreement or contract over $1 00,000, or loan or loan guarantee over $150,000, as defined at 15 CFR Part 28, Sections 28.1 05 and 28.110, the applicant certifies that to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL. "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agree- ments) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose according Iy. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31. U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Statement for Loan Guarantees and Loan Insurance . The undersigned states, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: If any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or em- ployee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions, Submission of this statement is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required statement shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above applicable certificatlon(s). NAME OF APPLICANT AWARD NUMBER AND/OR PROJECT NAME PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE DATE \"... FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT (Long Form) (Follow instructions on the back) 2. Federal Grant or Other Identifying Number Assigned By Federal Agency ...., 1. federal Agency and Organizational Element to Which Report is Submitted OMB Approval No. 0348-0039 pages 3. Recipient Organization (Name ami complete address, including ZIP code) 4. Employer Identrfication Number 5. Recipient Account Number or Identifying NLlTlber 6. Fmal Report I] Yes I] No 7. Basis C Cash D Accrual 6. FundinglGrant Period (See mstructions) From: (Month. Day, Year) To: (Month. Day, Year) 9. Period Covered by this Report From: (Month, Day, Year) To; (Month. Day, Year) 10. Transadlons: Previous Re rted This Period III Cumulative a. Telaloutlays b. Refunds, rebates, etc. c. Program income used in accordance with the deduction alternative d. Net outlays (Line a, less the sum of fines b and c) Recipienl's sharo of nol outlays, consisting of: e Third party (in-kind) contributions f. Other Federal awards authoriZed to be used to match this award 9 Program income used in accordance with the matching or cost sharing alternative h. All other recipient outlays not shown on lines e. for 9 Total recipient share of net outlays (Sum or Ifnes e, f. g and h) Federal share of net outlays (line d less lins i) a, Type of Rate (Place "X" in appropriate box) D Provisional Total unliquidated obligations Recipient's share of unliquidated obligations m. Federal share of unliquidated obligations n. Total Federal share (sum orrinesj and m) o. T otet Federal funds authorized for this funding period p. Unobligated balance of Federal funds (Line 0 minus fine n) Program IncomB, consisting of: q. Disbursed program income shown on lines c andlor 9 above r. ~isbursed program income using the aclditicn atternative s. Undisbursed program income t Tota! program income realized (Sum of fines q, rand sJ 11. Indirect Expense b Rate C. Base D Predetermined d. Total Amount D Final e, I] Fixed Federal Share 12. Remarks: Attach any explanations deemed necessary or information required by Federal sponsoring agency in compliance with governIng legislation. 13. CertifICation: Telephone (Area code, number and extension) Signature of Authorized Certifying Official Date Report Submitted Previous Edition Usable NSN 7540-01-012-4265 269-104 Standard Form 269 (Rev. 7-97) Prescribed by OMS Circulars A-102 and A-110 200-498 P.O. 139 (Face) FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT (Long Form) ,.."" \.,..- Public reporti.ng burden for this collection of informatio~ Is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, induding time for reviewing instructions. searching eXisting data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed. and completing and revIewing the ccllection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden. to the OffICe of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0039), Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. Please type or print legibly. The following general instructions explain how to use the form itself, You may need additional information to complete certain items correctly. or to decide whether a specific item is applicable to this award. Usually, such information will be found i1 the Federal agency's grant regulations or i1 the terms and conditions of the award (e.g" how to calculate the Federal share, the permissible uses of program income, the value of in-kind contributions. etc.). You may also contact the Federal agency directly, llimL- Entry 1, 2 and 3, Self-explanatory, 4, Enter the Employer Identification Number (EIN) assigned by the U,S, Internal Revenue Service, 5 Space reserved for an account number or other identifying number assigned by Ihe recipient 6, Check yes only ij this is the last report for the period shown in item 8, 7. Self-explanatory 8. Unless you have received other instructions from the awarding agency, enter the beginning and ending dates of the current funding period. ij this is a multi-year program, the Federal agency might require cumulative reporting through consecutive funding periods. In that case, enter the beginning and ending dates of the grant period, and in the rest of these instructions, substitute the tenn "grant period" for "funding period." 9. Self-explanatory, 1 0, The purpose of columns. I, Ii, and III is to show the effect of this reporting period's transactions on cumulative financial status. The amounts entered in column I will normally be the same as those in column III of the previous report in the same funding period. If this is the first or only report of the funding period. leave columns I and I blank, n you need to adjust amounts entered on previous reports, footnote the column I entry on this report and attach an explanation. 10a. Enter total gross program outlays. Include disbursements of cash realized as program income if that income will also be shown on lines 1 Dc or 109. Do not include program income that will be shown on lines 1 Or or 10s, For reports prepared on a cash basis, outlays are the sum of actual cash disbursements for direct cosls for goods and services, the amounl of indirect expense charged, the value of in-kind contributions applied, and the amount 01 cash advances and payments made to subrecipients. For reports prepared on an accrual basis, outlays are the sum of actual cash disbursements for direct charges for goods and services, the amount of indirect expense incurred, the value of in-kind contributions applied, and the net increase or decrease in the amounts owed by the recipient for goeds and other property received, for services pe¡formed by employees, contractors, subgrantees and other payees, and other amounts becoming owed under programs for which no current services or performances are required, such as annuities, insurance claims, and other benefit payments, Item Entry 10b. Enter any receipts related to outlays reported on the form that are being treated as a reduction af expenditure rather than income, and were not already netted out or the amount shown as outlays on line 10a, 10c. Enter the amount of program income that was used in accordance with the deduction alternative. Note: Program income used in accordance with other alternatives is entered on lines q, r, and 9. Recipients reporting on a cash basis should enter the amount of cash income received; on an acc:rual basis, enter the program income earned. Program incame mayor may not have been included in an application budget and/or a budget on the award document. If actual income is from a different source or is significantly different in amount. attach an explanation or use the remarks section. 10d. e, I. g. h. i andj. Self-explanalory, 10k. Enter the tolal amount of unliquidated obligations, including unliquidated obligations to subgrantees and contractors Unliquidated obligations on a cash basis are obligations incurred, but not yet paid. On an accrual basis, they are obligations incurred, but for which an outlay has not yet been recorded. Do not include any amounts on line 10k that have been included on lines 1 Oa and 10j, On the final report, line 1 Ok must be lero. 101, Self-explanatory, 10m. On the final report, line 10m must aiso be zero, 10n. 0, p, q. r, sand t. Seif-explanatory. 11 a, Self-explanatory, 11 b. Enter Ihe indirect casl rate in effect during the reporting period. 11c, Enter the amount of the base against which the rate was applied, 11d. Enter the total amount of indirect costs charged during the report period, 11e. Enter the Federal share of the amounl in 11d. Note If more than one rate was in effecl during the period shown in item 8, attach a schedule showing the bases against which the different rates were applied. the respective rates, fhe calendar pertods they were in effect, amounts of indirect expense charged to the project, and the Federal share of indirect expense charged to the project to) date. SF-269 Back (Rev, 7-97) ~ ""'" ASSURANCES· NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS OMS Approval No. 0348-0040 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information. including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0040), Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY. NOTE: Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program, If you have questions, please contact the awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be notified. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant: 1, Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project cost) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application. 2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award: and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. 3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain. 4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. 5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F,R. 900, Subpart F). 6, Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. as amended (20 U.S.C. §§1681- 1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex: (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Previous Edition Usable Act of 1973, as amended (29 U,S,C. §794), which prohibits discrimination on th'e basis of handicaps: (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (PL 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (I) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (PL 91-616), as amended. relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) §§523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S,C. §§290 dd-3 and 290 ee- 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§3601 et'seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and, UJ the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. 7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally-assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases. 8. Will comply, as applicable, with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form 4248 (Rev. 7-97) Prescribed by OM8 C;ircular A-102 '-' 9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §276c and 18 U,S,C, §874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§327- 333), regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction subagreements. 10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the tolal cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more. 11, Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (PL 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L. 93-523); and, (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (PL 93- 205). """ 12, Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. §§1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. 13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. §470), EO 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. §§469a-1 et seq.). 14. Will comply with P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research, development, and related activities supported by this award of assistance. 15, Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (PL 89-544, as amended. 7 U.S.C. §§2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling, and trealment of warm blooded animals held for research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of assistance. 16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. 17. Will cause to be peñormed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. " 18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, executive orders. regulations. and policies governing this program. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL TITLE APPLICANT ORGANIZATION DATE SUBMITTED Standard Form 424B (Rev. 7-97) Back '-'" ~ OMB Approval No. 0348-0042 ASSURANCES - CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information, Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0042), Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY. NOTE: Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions, please contact the Awarding Agency. Further, certain Federal assistance awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances, If such is the case, you will be notified, As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant: 1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance, 8. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act and the institutional, managerial and financial capability of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§4728-4763) relating to prescribed (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share standards for merit systems for programs funded of project costs) to ensure proper planning, under one of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in management and completion of the project described in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of this application. Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F). 2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the assistance: and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. 3. Will not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title, or other interest in the site and facilities without permission and instructions from the awarding agency. Will record the Federal interest in the title of real property in accordance with awarding agency directives and will include a covenant in the title of real property aquired in whole or in part with Federal assistance funds to assure non- discrimination during the useful life of the project. 4. Will comply with the requirements of the assistance awarding agency with regard to the drafting, review and approval of construction plans and specifications. 5. Will provide and maintain competent and adequate engineering supervision at the construction site to ensure that the complete work conforms with the approved plans and specifications and will furnish progress reports and such other information as may be required by the assistance awarding agency or State. 6. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. 7, Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain. 9. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§4801 et seq,) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. 10. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to non- discrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U,S.C, §§1681- 1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. §794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S_C. §§6101·6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse: (f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) §§523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§290 dd-3 and 290 ee- 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records: (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§3601 et seq,), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing: (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made: and, ü) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. Previous Edition Usable Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form 424D (Rev. 7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A·102 ""'" 11. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal and federally-assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases. 12. Will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S,C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. 13, Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S,C, §§276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §276c and 18 U.S.C. §874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§327- 333) regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction subagreements. 14. Will comply with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (p.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more. 15, Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the ...¡ National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91- 190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U,S.C. §§1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L. 93-523); and, (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 93-205). 16. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S,C. §§1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. 17. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. §470), EO 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S,C, §§469a-1 et seq.). 18. Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133. "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations." 19. Win comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws. executive orders, regulations, and policies governing this program. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL TITLE APPLICANT ORGANIZATION DATE SUBMITTED SF-424D (Rev. 7-97) Back " '-" AGENDA REQUEST r~ NO.L=lD.. DATE: Jan. 22, 2002 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Sheriffs Office PRESENTED BY: William Simon Grant Administrator SUBJECT: Request for authorization to submit an electronic application for the State Criminal Alien Grant 2002. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office has filled out an electronic application to participate in the 2002 State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) offered annually by the US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance (USDOJ/BJA). SCAAP is a retroactive reimbursement grant awarded to localities that had to incarcerate undocumented criminal aliens. The actual allocation will be calculated by USDOJ/BJA based on the number of detained aliens in the past year. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve electronic submission of the 2002 State Criminal Alien Grant application, and authorize the County Administrator to sign the application. COMMISSION ACTION: E: [2\Ì APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: XX d%/ Coordination/SiGn atures Macag,m ,ct & .,dg" ~.~ fY)~ P'<ch.,'cg. Public Works: Other: Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only. if applicable) XX G:\BUDGETI WPIAGENDA'S\Agenda02\ 1 '22SC AAP _ Grant wpd State Cnuunal Alien AssIstance Program Application Application Handbook Applicant Contact Inmate Facillt)/ Submit Help/Frequently Asked Questions GMS Home Loa Off Page 1 of3 '-' ..., State Criminal Alien Assistance Program Award ¡SWitCh to '" .:l Report:Lng Payments Correspondence OMB Number: 1121-0243 Expires: 02/29/2004 Applicant Information Application Number: 2002-F0379-FL-AP Welcome to the SCAAP on-line application process for Fiscal Year 2002. New for 2002 Browser Compatibility For maximum compatibility and functionality, theFY 2002 SCAAP on-line application system is best accessed using the following browsers: Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher and Netscape Navigator 4.7 or higher. For information on downloading either of these browsers, please click here. Use of any version of an AOL browser could seriously impact an applicant's ability to access all portions of the on-line SCAAP application and submit a completed application through the system. Only applications submitted electronically through the FY 2002 SCAAP system will be accepted. Country of Birth Codes Beginning with the FY 2002 SCAAP application ALL applicants MUST use the standard INS country codes for the country of birth information provided in the inmate records. No custom or abbreviated country codes will be accepted, regardless of whether or not a jurisdiction submits a country code data dictionary. Inmate records that do not contain the required country code format will be considered incomplete and will not be eligible for funding under FY 2002 SCAAP. Standard INS country codes vary in length from 2 to 5 letters. Please enter the appropriate code and add spaces after the code, to pad section to a maximum field length of 10 characters. To download and print a complete list of the current INS country codes, please click here. Inmate File Format All inmate files must be submitted in the required ASCII text format, as detailed in the attached format description and sample file. In addition, BJA is making available a sample file that can be downloaded for use in preparing applicant inmate records file. Please note that the file must be field/space delimited and not contain any tabs, characters, etc. that are not part of the https://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/application.do ?aspect= Application&mode= 1 &applicationID= 1 '... 1/15/2002 State Criminal Alien Assistance Program Page 2 of3 '-' ....¡ actual data. Additional Inmate Data Review and Feedback The SCAAP on-line system has been enhanced to include additional data review and real-time feedback to applicants. At the time that the inmate files are uploaded, the on-line system will verify that every record is in the correct format, that it is complete and the data appears valid. Upon completion of the data review, applicants will receive an on-screen report advising them of the results of the data review. This report will include not only the total count of complete and incomplete records, but will also provide a detailed explanation of which records had errors and the exact nature of all errors. Upon receipt of the on-screen data report, applicants will be provided an opportunity to either correct the data errors or submit the file with the errors. Applicants need to know that once the FY 2002 application is submitted, inmate files will not be available for any data changes. In order to ensure that the maximum number of inmate records are considered for payment, it is important that applicants correct any data errors at the time of the file upload and before the application is submitted to BJA. Using the Online System To navigate throughout the application system, click on the tabs above. The "Save Information" button below saves the data entered and advances you to the next tab. Please click here to view or download an overview of the program. (If your browser is unable to open the download file, click here to get the required viewer software plug-in.) The SCAAP program is designed to provide federal assistance to states and units of general government (counties, cities, etc.) for costs related to incarcerating undocumented criminal aliens (refer to the "Inmate" tab for criteria). Applications must be completed by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the state or unit of local government or his/her official designee. The application must be completed by an official employee of the applicant juridiction and this person must have the authority to bind the jurisdiction to the assurances and certifications associated with the SCAAP program. Implementing agencies (sheriff's department, police department, correctional facilities) are NOT considered direct applicants, but may be designated by the CEO to make an application on behalf of the state or unit of general government. Wardens, Police Chiefs, Sheriffs, Fiscal Directors, etc. may not be listed as the CEO of any jurisdiction on the User Account or Application. Any User Accounts or Applications that list an incorrect CEO will not be considered. Payment Information Once the FY 2002 SCAAP application period has closed and all data has been reviewed by INS, all payments are calculated using a relational formula. ALL payments will be released simultaneously by March 31, 2002. Payments will be made electronically ONL Y to the general fund of the state or unit of local government, not to accounts established for any submitting agency or https://grants.ojp,usdoj.gov/application.do ?aspect= Application&mode= I &applicationID= 1 'm 1/15/2002 State Criminal Alien Assistance Program Page 3 of3 '-' -."I department within the governmental unit. Public Reporting Burden Paperwork Reduction Act Notice. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. We try to create forms and instructions that are accurate, can be easily understood, and which impose the least possible burden on you to provide us with information. The estimated average time to complete and file this application is 30 minutes per application. If you have comments regarding the accuracy of this estimate, or suggestions for making this form simpler, you can write to the Bureau of Justice Assistance, 810 7th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20531. Applicant/Organization Information Level Of Government: County Jurisdiction: St. Lucie County Submittinq Aqencv: St Lucie County Sheriff Office Please enter the CEO information for your jurisdiction below. Remember, this is the CEO of the level of government, not the implementing agency. (Note: Hit the TAB key to move between fields) CEO Of Your Jurisdiction: Governor, Cabinet-level State Official, County Administrator, County Judge, County Comissioner, Mayor, or City Manager Prefix: Mr, ..:I *First Name: Douglas *Last Name: Anderson *Title: ICounty Administrator *Address 1: 12300 Virginia Ave. Address 2: 1 *Qtl: ¡Fort Pierce * State: I Florida *Zip Code: 134982 -15652 *Phone: ([5'61) ~-11450 Phone Ext: I Fax: ( [5'61) ~-12131 *E:m~Ü!: gorniewm@co.st-Iucie: .:::1 *- Indicates required field Save Information https://grants.ojp.usdoj .gov/application.do?aspect= Application&mode= 1 &applicationID= 1·... 1/15/2002 '-' ,.,J 1 State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) Purpose and Background The State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) is administered by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), United States Department of Justice (DOJ), in conjunction with the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). SCAAP provides Federal assistance to States and localities that are incuning costs of incarcerating undocumented criminal aliens who have been accused or convicted of State and local offenses. SCAAP is authorized by Section 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1990, as amended, 8 U.S.C. Part 1231(i). Click here to view an excerpt from the enabling legislation, Section 241 gives the Attorney General the discretion, in the event of an appropriation, to either assist States and localities with costs incurred in incarcerating qualifying criminal aliens or take such aliens into Federal custody. The Attorney General has exercised his discretion to use the financial assistance option by delegating program implementation authority through the OJP Assistant Attorney General to BJA. BJA is a criminal justice grant-making and administrative agency; SCAAP is a program that provides fmancial assistance only. Note that SCAAP is a payment program, not a reimbursement or entitlement program. Due to the constructive feedback from applicants, Congress, and other supportive DOJ agencies, there have been several major changes in SCAAP Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 dating from FY 2000. FY 2002 SCAAP SCAAP FY 2002 is managed entirely through the Web-based system. Applicants provide applicant, inmate, and facility data for a specified period during the formal application period. Once that application period closes, data are reviewed by BJA and INS. Approved data are processed by formula to determine an applicant's relative percentage of total SCAAP funding for that fiscal year. Therefore, as the formula is used to determine relative amounts of funding for individual applicants, application must be made during the formal application period. If the application period is missed, data for that year may not be submitted during a subsequent application period. The reporting period for SCAAP FY 2002 is July 1,2000 to June 30, 2001. SCAAP Data FY 2002 SCAAP payment amounts will be determined by fixed formula using a data set that has been refined from previous years based on BJA and other DOJ agencies' experience with the program. FY 2002 is both streamlined in regard to the application/payment systems, and payment amounts are determined using actual empirical data without any "data averaging" or "one-day sampling" techniques. The enhanced data processing capabilities of the new Internet-system allow for effective and efficient management of high volumes of empirical data through the formula process as well as ensure that payments will be available to applicants in less than four (4) months '-" ..I 2 from the opening of the FY 2002 SCAAP application period, provided applicants take actions as indicated. Applicants will see several on-screen certifications that not only ask them to ensure the accuracy of the data and the presence of a file on-site that supports their on-screen data entries, but also that asks them to certify that they understand that the submission of fraudulent and/or misleading data will affect SCAAP funding to that jurisdiction. The FY 2002 application asks for the following types of data: Applicant: Data about each applying jurisdiction and individual contact infonnation. Facility: Data about the total number of inmate beds; total inmate days for all inmates housed during the reporting period, including United States citizens, legal aliens, illegal aliens and individuals of unknown inunigrant status; and the aggregate correctional officer salary costs, excluding benefits and overtime. Inmate: Inmate data continue to include the A-Number if assigned; last, middle and first name; date of birth; foreign country of birth; unique inmate number assigned by the applicant; date taken into custody and date released from custody, or the last day of the reporting period if the inmate is still in custody at the end of the reporting period. If an FBI number is known, that number can also be included. Inmate Data FY 2000 was a critical transition year for the SCAAP program. Applicants transitioned from scannable fonns and disk modes of data transmission used in prior years to the new Internet-based, Web-designed SCAAP system. In FY 2000 applicants were permitted to submit inmate data using their own fonnats as long as data dictionaries were also submitted. However, the FY 2000 system clearly established the standard inmate reporting fonnat for all subsequent submissions of inmate data beginning in FY 2001. Beginning in FY 2001, the SCAAP process required that all data be submitted in the SCAAP system fonnat. Click this line to review and print the required inmate data fonnat and a sample data file. Applicants still may submit data via on screen data entry or by file upload as long as the standard data fonnat is followed. It is not necessary to provide actual offense codes on the FY 2002 application but applicants are required to certify that either one felony or two misdemeanors have been committed by each inmate whose record is being provided for SCAAP funding purposes, and that this infonnation is maintained at their site in a file that can be audited. Applicants mav not include any inmate records for individual inmates, for who payments, to cover the costs of incarceration, are received from other jurisdictions or the Federal Government, including, but not limited to, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and the U.S. Marshals Service. Applicants should include infonnation relating to costs for undocumented criminal aliens that are housed in other locations at a cost to the applicant. '-' ..""I 3 Facility Data Cost data are gathered in the Facility section of the application. These data represent another example of the streamlining of the SCAAP processing of data to determine applicants' relative percentages of available funding. Beginning with FY 200 I the cost data required were narrowed to one (1) cost element. Salary costs, excluding benefits and overtime pay, for all correctional officers (part-time and full-time) in a facility used to incarcerate the illegal aliens must be reported in the application. As aggregate salary costs for correctional officers will be common to all applicants and as this data element tends to account for the majority of costs that have been considered in the past, this streamlining of the cost data will serve applicants' interests equally. To avoid unnecessary applicant confusion, BJA has consulted with various DOJ agencies in refming the data elements, including relying on the Bureau of Justice Statistics for a reasonable definition of correctional officer. SCAAP Payments Individual SCAAP payment amounts are determined once all data have been reviewed and approved by BJA and INS, The data are then processed using a formula to determine an individual applicant's relative percentage of the total available funding, and then that percentage is expressed in a dollar amount. Applicants receive an e-mail notification that payments are ready to be accepted. Formal acceptance of the payment on-line is necessary for funds to be electronically transferred into the applicant account. If account information has not been provided to OJP previously, the applicants are required to provide this information during the payment acceptance process. State Criminal Alien Assistance Program Application Application Handbook Applicant Contact Inmate Facility Submit Help/Frequently Asked Ouestion~ GMS Home Log Off \w: State Criminal Alien Assistance Program Page 1 of 1 ...,J Award Reportinq Payments Correspondence Contact Information Application Number: 2002-F0379-FL-AP SwitCh to ... ..:I OMB Number: 1121-0243 Expires: 02/29/2004 Please enter the alternate contact information below. (Note: Hit the TAB key to move between fields) Prefix: Mr. ..:1 *First Name: William *Last Name: ISimon *Title: ¡Grant Programs Administrator *Address 1: 4700West Midway Road Address 2: *City: ¡Fort Pierce *State: Florida *Zip Code: 134981 -14825 *Phone: (~) 462- 13359 Phone Ext: I Fax: ( š61) 462- 13218 *:Em_a_il: Iwrsimon@hotmail.com *- Indicates required field Save Information https://grants.ojp.usdoj .gov/contactSCAAP .do ~ 1/15/2002 State Criminal Alien Assistance Program Page 1 of 1 '- ...,J State Criminal Alien Assistance Program '''''>O'''''"-A' e Application Award Reportinq ~ments Correspondence SWitch to... .:1 Application Handbook OMB Number: 1121-0243 Expires: 02/29/2004 Applicant Contact Information Contact Inmate Application Number: 2002-F0379-FL-AP Facility Please enter the alternate contact information below. (Note: Hit the TAB key to move between fields) Submit Prefix: Mrs. ..:1. *First Name: Maria *Last Name: Gorniewicz *Iitle: ¡Budget Analyst *.A.~cI[~~.~LI,: 12300 West Virginia Avenue Address 2: 1 *Qt¥: IFort Pierce *State: Florida *Zip Code: 134982 -15652 *Phone: ( 5'6"1') ~- 1733 Phone Ext: 1 F:aJS: ( 5'6"1') ~-12117 *Email: gorniewm@co.st-lucie.fI.us Help/Frequently Asked Questions GMS Home Log Off .:1 *- Indicates required fieid Save Information https://grants.ojp.usdoj .gov/contactSCAAP .do 1/15/2002 SCAAP Frequently Asked Questions Page 10f6 '-"' """" SCAAP Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) · General Proqram QI,!estions · Chanqes from Prior Fiscal Years · Facility Data Tab · Inmate Data Tab · Processinq your SCAAP Payment Top of Page General Program Questions 1. What is the SCAAP Program? The State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) is administered by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA)¡ Office of Justice Programs (OJP), United States Department of Justice (DOJ)¡ in conjunction with the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). SCAAP provides Federal assistance to States and localities that are incurring costs of incarcerating undocumented criminal aliens who have been accused or convicted of State and local offenses and have been incarcerated for a minimum of 72 hours. SCAAP is authorized by Section 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1990, as amended¡ 8 U.S.c. Part 1231(i). Section 241 gives the Attorney General the discretion¡ in the event of an appropriation¡ to either assist States and localities with costs incurred in incarcerating qualifying criminal aliens or take such aliens into Federal custody. The Attorney General has exercised her discretion to use the financial assistance option by delegating program implementation authority through the OJP Assistant Attorney General to BJA. BJA is a criminal justice grant-making and administrative agency; SCAAP is a program that provides financial assistance only. Please note that SCAAP is a payment program¡ not a reimbursement or entitlement program. Due to the constructive feedback from applicants¡ Congress¡ and other supportive DOJ agencies¡ there were several major changes in FY 2000 SCAAP from the program in prior years. 2. What is the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for SCAAP? The CFDA number for SCAAP is 16.606 3. What is the application period for FY2002 SCAAP? January 3rd¡ 2002 to February 1st, 2002. However, ALL applicants must register for SCAAP prior to 5:00 pm (EDT) on January 25th, 2001. 4. Who can submit applications for SCAAP? The Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) will approve applications for user accounts for the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) for the fiscal year 2002 funding that are submitted ONLY by a public official. SCAAP user accounts can be established for only one user per eligible jurisdiction and this user must be the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), or formal public official designee and/or program contact, able to bind the jurisdiction legally to the terms of the SCAAP program. A CEO may not delegate this responsibility to a non-public official or a public official outside his/her jurisdiction. An applicant may utilize whatever assistance it deems appropriate to gather needed information for https://grants.ojp.usdoj .gov/faqSCAAP .html 1/15/2002 SCAAP Frequently Asked Questions Page 2 of6 '- ..1 the completion of the SCAAP on-line application and payment acceptance processes; however, it may delegate only to a public official within the applicant jurisdiction the responsibility for actually establishing user accounts and completing the on-line processes. By entering into the certifications contained in this application, the State or political subdivision of the State is committing to use general revenues to reimburse the Federal government upon demand for any overpayment. Accordingly, the user entitled to submit an application for the SCAAP program must be an individual empowered to commit the general revenue funds of the State of political subdivision of a State. This ability to commit tax dollars is an inherently governmental function, which cannot be delegated outside of the government. Any applying jurisdiction violating these requirements will be subject to formal action, including nullification of the fiscal year 2002 SCAAP application. S. Who is eligible to be considered the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of a jurisdiction? For the purpose of the SCAAP program, the below list is provided as a convenience, but may not be all inclusive. Jurisdiction CEO State Governor City Mayor/City Manager Town Chairperson of Town Council/Town Manager County President County Commision/County Administrator Louisiana Parish Sheriff Texas County Judge 6. Who is eligible to be listed as either the Authorized Representative or Alternate Contact in the User Profile information? Legislation authorizing the SCAAP Program mandates that payment of SCAAP funds is made to States and localities that meet the eligibility criteria, therefore the administering agency - Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and its staff can only interact with jurisdiction/applicant agency employees. Employees of the jurisdiction/applicant agency are eligible to be listed as either the Authorized Representative or Alternate Contact in the User Profile information. Top of Paqe Changes from Prior Fiscal Years 1. How do I submit my FY 2002 SCAAP application? Applications transitioned from the scannable forms and disk modes of data transmission used in prior years to the new Office of Justice Program's (OJP) Grants Management System (GMS). In FY 2002 data can be either uploaded from a jurisdiction's compatible files or entered into a template provided on the GMS site. 2. How has the payment formula changed? FY 2002 SCAAP payment amounts will be determined by fixed formula using a data set that has been refined from previous years based on BJA and other DOJ agencies' experience with the https://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/tàqSCAAP.html 1/16/2002 :SCAAY rrequently ASked <,¿uestlOns Page 3 of6 '- ...., program. FY 2002 is both streamlined with regard to the application/payment systems, and payment amounts are determined using actual empirical data without any "data averaging" or "one-day sampling" techniques. Salary costs, excluding benefits, for all correctional officers (part-time and full-time) in a facility used to incarcerate the illegal aliens must be reported in the application. This cost factor changed beginning with the fiscal year 2000 SCAAP process. Aggregate salary costs for correctional officers are common to all applicants and this data element tends to account for the majority of costs that were considered in the past. 3. Do I still report specific inmate offenses? No. For FY 2002, applicants must certify to the fact that each inmate, whose record is being provided for SCAAP funding purposes, has been accused or convicted of committing either one felony or two misdemeanor offenses, and that this information Is maintained at their site in a file that can be audited. Actual offense information does not need to be reported on the SCAAP application. 4. Can I use my jurisdiction custom country of birth code scheme? No. Beginning with the FY 2002 SCAAP application ALL applicants MUST use the standard INS country codes for the country of birth information provided in the inmate records. No custom or abbreviated country codes will be accepted, regardless of whether or not a jurisdiction submits a country code data dictionary. Inmate records that do not contain the required country code format will be considered incomplete and will not be eligible for funding under FY 2002 SCAAP. To download and print a complete list of the current INS country codes, please click here. Top of Paqe Facility Data Tab 1. What is included in the definition of "correctional officer"? A correctional officer is considered any full or part-time permanent and contractual custody staff, deputies and any dispatchers who have direct interaction with the inmate population. Administrative support and program staff must not be included. Correctional officers may include, but are not limited to, the following: · First-line correctional officers · First-line supervisors (Correctional Sergeants) · First-line managers (Correctional Lieutenants) · Wardens (Chief Executive Officers) For the purposes of SCAAP, correctional officers do not include clerical, educational, commissary, administrative, medical, or other such facility staff. 2. What should a facility include as part of its correctional officer salary costs? Salary information provided on the SCAAP application SHOULD NOT include benefits or overtime. However, if overtime costs are a fixed expense included in a salary package and/or included in a facilities budgetary process (as per contractual agreement), they can be included as part of a facility's correctional officer salary costs. Correctional officer salary costs may include premium pay for specialized service (eg. bilingual https://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/faqSCAAP.html 1/16/2002 SCAAP Frequently Asked Questions Page 4 of 6 \w. officers), shift differential pay, and fixed pay increases for time-in-service. ...,,¡J 3. What types of facility data are we required to report on the application? Data about the total number of inmate beds; total inmate days for all inmates housed during the reporting period, including United States citizens, legal aliens, illegal aliens and individuals of unknown immigrant status; and the aggregate correctional officer salary costs, excluding benefits. 4. Can correctional facility staff such as food service staff, medical staff, substance abuse counselors, vocational counselors, jail management staff (supervisors who have inmate contact) and facility wardens be included when calculating correctional officer salary costs? For the purpose of calculating correctional officer salary costs applicants should include: · First-line correctional officers · First-line supervisors (Correctional Sergeants) · First-line managers (Correctional Lieutenants) · Wardens (Chief Executive Officers) · Applicants must not include clerical, educational, commissary, administrative, medical, or other such facility staff, regardless of the degree of contact or amount of time spent with inmates Top of Paqe Inmate Data Tab 1. What types of inmate data are we required to report on the application? Inmate data continue to include the INS A-Number if assigned; last, middle and first name; date of birth; foreign country of birth; unique inmate number assigned by the applicant; date taken into custody and date released from custody, or the last day of the reporting period if the inmate is still in custody at the end of the reporting period. If an FBI number is known, that can be provided. 2. How do I submit my inmate data using the online application? Applicants have two choices in which to submit the inmate data for their correctional facility(ies): File Upload: The file upload function allows applicants to submit their inmate database files (in ASCII format) directly to BJA. File uploads must, at a minimum, contain the previously listed mandatory data fields. All inmate records MUST BE in the required BJA format. Files that are not in the required format will not be considered for funding. File uploads that do not include the necessary information will be considered incomplete and not eligible for funding under SCAAP. The SCAAP system will provide applicants with an opportunity to correct their files or add missing data prior to submitting the completed application. Data Entered: This function allows jurisdictions to manually enter inmate data using the template provided by BJA in the SCAAP application. This format allows applicants to manually enter all of the mandatory data required for inmate records to be considered for funding. 3. If I begin submitting inmate records using the data entry screens in the application, can I change my mind and finish by uploading a file containing all inmate records? Applicants must use one or the other method to submit inmate data. Once a method has been selected, prior to submission of the completed application, applicants can change the method of https:llgrants.ojp.usdoj.gov/faqSCAAP.html 1/16/2002 SCAAP Frequently Asked Questions Page 5 of6 '-' ..." submission. Applicants who change the method of submission must be aware that any such change will overwrite all previous inmate record submissions. 4. If a qualified inmate was taken into custody prior to or after the beginning and ending dates of the reporting period, what dates are used in the "Date Incarcerated" and/or "Date Released" fields of the Inmate Information? If a qualified inmate was taken into custody prior to the first date of the reporting period (July 1, 2000), use the actual date taken into custody as the "Date Incarcerated". If an inmate that is being included in the applicant's data was not released on or before the final date of the reporting period, the date June 30, 2001 should be used as the "Date Released". 5. Can inmates be included in the inmate data, if an applicant has a valid INS Alien Number (A#), but the inmate's country of birth is not known? No, if the country of birth is missing for an inmate record that record will be considered invalid. 6. What country of birth should be entered when the country provided by the inmate is not in the GMS drop-down list? BJA recognizes that the official names of some countries throughout the world have changed in recent years. If the country provided by the inmate is not on the list, the applicant should make every effort to determine which country on the GMS drop-down list has the closest political boundaries to the country provided by the inmate. Example: Inmate Country of Birth: Serbia GMS Drop-down List: Bosnia-Herzegovina 7. Can my jurisdiction include inmates that our facility is housing for the Federal Government or another jurisdiction? Applicants may not include any inmate records for individual inmates, for whom the jurisdiction received any payments from other jurisdictions or the Federal Government, including, but not limited to, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and the U.S. Marshals Service, to cover the cost of housing these specific illegal aliens. Applicants should include information relating to costs for undocumented criminal aliens that are housed in other locations at a cost to the applicant. TOD of Page Processing Your SCAAP Payment 1. When will my jurisdiction receive its payment? Once the FY 2002 SCAAP application period has closed and all data has been reviewed by INS, all payments are calculated using a relational formula. ALL payments are scheduled to be released simultaneously by March 31, 2002. Payments will be made electronically ONLY to the general fund of the state or unit of local government, not to accounts established for any submitting agency or department within the governmental unit. 2. How do I get my SCAAP funds? https://grants.ojp.usdoj .gov/faq SCAAP .html 1/16/2002 SCAAP Frequently Asked Questions '-' Page 60f6 ....I Applicants will receive e-mail notification that payments are ready to be accepted. Formal acceptance of the payment via the GMS is necessary for funds to be electronically transferred into the applicant account. If account information has not been provided to OJP previously, the applicants are required to provide this information at the time when they accept their payments online. https://grants.ojp.usdoj .gov/faq SCAAP .html 1/16/2002 · OMS Online Help Page 1 of 1 '-' ...; GRANT MANGEMENT SYSTEM ONLINE HELP Frequently Asked Questions FAQ I MORE HELP I SEARCH The Frequently Asked Questions component of the Grant Management System is currently under development. Until then, please email your questions to or call the U.S. Department of Justice Response Center at (800) 421-6770 or (202) 307-1480. Your comments, as well as questions, contribute significantly to our ability to provide high quality services to you. Close Window https:llgrants.ojp.usdoj.gov/faq.html 1/15/2002 Assurances Page 1 of 2 \.r ~ NOTE: You must click on the "Accept" button at the bottom of the page before closing this window ASSURANCES The Applicant hereby assures and certifies compliance with all Federal statutes, regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements, including OMS Circulars No, A-21 , A-110, A-122, A-128, A-87; E.O, 12372 and Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements 28 CFR, Part 66, Common rule, that govern the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted project. Also the Applicant assures and certifies that: 1, It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant; that a resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant's governing body, authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information may be required. 2, It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provides for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of Federal and federally-assisted programs. 3, It will comply with provisions of Federal law which limit certain political activities of employees of a State or local unit of government whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part by Federal grants. (5 USC 1501, et seq.) 4. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act 5. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties. 6. It will give the sponsoring agency or the Comptroller General, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the grant. 7. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the Federal sponsoring agency concerning special requirements of law, program requirements, and other administrative requirements, 8. It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or supervision which shall be utilized in the accomplishment of the project are not listed on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify the Federal grantor agency of the receipt of any communication from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities indicating that a facility to be used in the project is under consideration for listing by the EPA. 9, It will comply with the fiood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234, 87 Stat. 975, approved December 31, 1976, Section 102(a) requires, on and after March 2, 1975, the purchase of flood insurance in communities where such insurance is available as a condition for the receipt of any Federal financial assistance for construction or acquisition purposes for use in any area that has been identified by the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development as an area having special flood hazards. The phrase "Federal financial assistance" includes any form of loan, grant, guaranty, insurance payment, rebate, subsidy, disaster assistance loan or grant, or any other form of direct or indirect Federal assistance. 10. It will assist the Federal grantor agency in its compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (16 USC 470), Executive Order 11593, and the Archeological and Historical Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC 569a-1 et seq,) by (a) consulting with https://grants.ojp.usdoj .gov/GenAssurances.jsp?assured=N &assureID= 13 21 1/16/2002 · Assurances Page 2 of2 -- , \w ~ the State Historic Preservation Officer on the conduct of Investigations, as necessary, to identify properties listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places that are subject to adverse effects (see 36 CFR Part 800.8) by the activity, and notifying the Federal grantor agency of the existence of any such properties and by (b) complying with all requirements established by the Federal grantor agency to avoid or mitigate adverse effects upon such properties, 11. It will comply, and assure the compliance of all its subgrantees and contractors, with the applicable provisions of Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, or the Victims of Crime Act, as appropriate; the provisions of the current edition of the Office of Justice Programs Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants, M71 00.1; and all other applicable Federal laws, orders, circulars, or reg u lation s, 12, It will comply with the provisions of 28 CFR applicable to grants and cooperative agreements including Part 18, Administrative Review Procedure; Part 20, Criminal Justice Information Systems; Part 22, Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and Statistical Information; Part 23, Criminal Intelligenc;e Systems Operating Policies; Part 30, Intergovernmental Review of Department of Justice Programs and Activities; Part 42, Nondiscrimination/Equal Employment Opportunity Policies and Procedures; Part 61, Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act; Part 63, Floodplain Management and Wetland Protection Procedures; and Federal laws or regulations applicable to Federal Assistance Programs. 13, It will comply, and all its contractors will comply, with the non- discrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC 3789(d). or Victims of Crime Act (as appropriate); Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975; Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C,D,E, and G; and Department of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and Part 39. 14. In the event a Federal or State court or Federal or State administrative agency makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the recipient will forward a copy of the finding to the Office for Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, 15. It will provide an Equal Employment Opportunity Program if required to maintain one, where the application is for $500,000 or more. 16. It will comply with the provisions of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (P.L. 97-348) dated October 19, 1982 (16 USC 3501 et seq.) which prohibits the expenditure of most new Federal funds within the units of the Coastal Barrier Resources System. Accept I https://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/GenAssurances.j sp?assured=N &assureID= 13 21 III 6/2002 L-Cl L111\,.,aL1UU::þ t'age 1 or ~ \w ...,J NOTE: You must click on the "Accept" button at the bottom otthe page before closing this windo..... U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Applicants should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this form. Signature of this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69, "New Restrictions on Lobbying" and 28 CFR Part 67, "Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonpro- curement) and Government-wide Requirements for Drug- Free Workplace (Grants)." The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Justice determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement. 1. LOBBYING As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U.S, Code, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 69, for persons entering into a grant or cooperative agreement over $100,000, as defined at 28 CFR Part 69, the applicant certifies that: (a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for in-fluencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in con-nection with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal grant or cooperative agreement; (b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in accordance with its instructions; (c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this cer-tification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subgrants, contracts under grants and cooperative agreements, and subcontracts) and that all sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. 2. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (DIRECT RECIPIENT) As required by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, for prospective participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at 28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510 A. The applicant certifies that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, sentenced to a denial of Federal benefits by a State or Federal court, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1 )(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transactions (Federal, https://grants.ojp. usdoj .gov/GenCertifications.jsp?certified=N&certify ID= 13 20 1/16/2002 Certitlcatlons Page 2 of 3 '-" State, or local) terminated for cause or default; and .....J B. Where the applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an explanation to this application, 3, DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS) As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 28 CFR Part 67 Sections 67.615 and 67.620 A. The applicant certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program to inform employees about (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will (1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; (e) Notifying the agency, in writing, within 10 calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such convic-tion, Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, ATTN: Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20531, Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; (t) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (t). https:llgrants.ojp.usdoj .gov/GenCertifications.j sp?certified=N &certifyID= 1320 1/16/2002 · Certifications Page 3 of3 \tw ~ As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above certifications. Accept I https:llgrants.ojp.usdoj.gov/GenCertifications.j sp ?certified= N &certi fy ID= 1320 1/16/2002 "",. "wIiÎ ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 4 District 5 AGENDA December 22, 2001 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held December 18, 2001. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 12 through No. 16 2. MOSQUITO CONTROL Interlocal Agreement with St. Lucie County to Administer the Coastal Impact Assistance Program Bear Point Restoration Project / Budget Resolution No. 02-01 and Equipment Request No. 02-184, No. 02-185, and No. 02-186 - Consider staff recommendation that the Chairman sign the agreement, and approve the budget amendment and equipment requests to purchase three pumps to restore the wetlands. ~OTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to aplleal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record ofthe proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record ofthe proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn tn. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a he.tring upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (56)) 462-1777 or TUB (561) 462-1428 ut le:lst forty-cight{48) hours prior to the meeting, \r ...., MOSQUITO CONTROL BOARD ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: December 18, 2001 Tape: 2 Convened: 9:00 p.m. Adjourned: 9:04 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, John D. Bruhn, Doug Coward, Frannie Hutchinson, Cliff Barnes, Paula A. Lewis absent Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Bill Blazak Utilities Director, Don West, County Engineer, Sheriff Mascara, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the minutes of the meeting held November 20,2001; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The District approved Warrant List No.8 through 11. 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY Pepper Park Addition/Option Agreement for Sale and Purchase- Thc District approved the agreement for Parcel F, authorized the Chairman to execute the agreements and directed staff to close the transactions and record the documents in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 3. MOSQUITO CONTROL Acceptance of Contribution from Angler's Cove to Perform Environmental Mitigation Requirement- The District approved accepting the $3,800 contribution to fund installation of a corrugated aluminum culver pipe in Impoundment 9, approved Budget Resolution No. 01-05 and authorized the Chairman to execute the budget resolution. There being no further busIness to be brought before the District, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman 01/18/02 F7.ABWARR FUND TITLE 145 Mosquito Fund \r ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD "wIÌ WARRANT LIST #16- 12-JAN-2002 TO 18-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 7,849.56 7,849.56 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 23,149.47 23,149.47 12/21/01 F"7,ABWARR FUND TITLE 145 Mosquito Fund \.,./ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA 'WI WARRANT LIST #12- 15-DEC-2001 TO 21-DEC-2001 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO EXPENSES 7,239.47 GRAND TOTAL: 7,239.47 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 24,599.02 24,599.02 12/28/01 FZABWARR FUND TITLE 145 \wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA ..., WARRANT LIST #13- 22-DEC-2001 TO 28~DEC-2001 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO EXPENSES Mosquito Fund 11,415.51 GRAND TOTAL: 11,415.51 J (. PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 01/04/02 FZABWARR FUND 145 TITLE Mosquito Fund \wI ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ..., WARRANT LIST #14- 29-DEC-2001 TO 04-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 25,341.06 25,341.06 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 23,118.86 23,118.86 01/11'/02 V'7ABWARR FUND 145 TITLE Mosquito Fund \.I" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD '-' WARRANT LIST #15- 05-JAN-2002 TO 11-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 13,936.06 13,936.06 ... PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 ~$ \.' ...., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: January 22, 2002 CONSENT [X ] REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ Quasi-JD. TO: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Mosquito Control PRESENTED BY: Jim David Director SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL. : PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: Authorize the Mosquito Control Dis~rict to sign the Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County a~d the St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District to administer the C~astal Impact Assistance Prografl Grant for the Reintegration of Bear Point Mosquito Impound~ent to the Indian River Lagoon. In additio~, authorize the attached Budget Reso~ution No. 02-01 and the follo;,i~g equipment requests for pumps: EQ 02-184, EQ 02-185, EQ 02-186. In the budget year 2001, Congress au~horized the new Coastal Impact Assistance Program (ClAP) and ea~,arked $19.2 million dollars for Florida. Since the proposed pro~ec~ to restore wetlands for Bear Point is consistent with the C:':.".P program's goal to conserve, protect and restore wetlands, the r·lcsquito Control District wetland restoration project at Bear Point ~as awarded $63,273. Although the contract for the award identifies s~_ Lucie County as the recipient, the Mosquito Control District will ce responsible for completing the project and the final reports to Loe agency. For that reason, staff recommends ~haL the Mosquito Control District sign the Interlocal Agreement with St. Lucie County to authorize the District to manage this ClAP grant =unded restoration project. The grant application included the purchase of three pumps. Attached to this agenda are three equipment re~~ests for the pumps and a Budget Resolution required to purchase the P'JIDPS to restore the wetlands. No match is required for this grant application. On May 22, 2001, the BOCC authorized the submittal of a grant application to the Coastal Impact Assistance Program. Staff recommends that the Mos~Jito Control District sign the Interlocal Agreement with St. Lucie County to administer the Coastal Impact Assistance Program Bear Point restoration project. In addition, approve the Budget Resol1.:tion No. 02-01 and the three equipment requests EQ 02-184, EQ 02-185, EQ 02 -186. DENIED .c~ty Attorney: \»figinating Dept: Finance: ~/ / Purchasing : Other: Mgt , Budget: Public Works: ~ ..", RESOLUTION NO. 02-01 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the SI. Lucie County Mosquito Control District Board budget, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available in a form of a $63,273.00 grant from the NOAA ClAP Program. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of the St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District Board to adopt a resolution to appropriate and ex pend such funds, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED hy the Mosquito Control District Board of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 22ND day of January, 2002, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2001-2002, and the District's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 145112-6230-331393-6950 National Oceanic & Atm ospheric Adm in $63,273 APPROPRIA TIONS 145112-6230-563000-6950 145112-6230-564000-6950 Imp OIT Bldg Machinery & Equipment $24,573 $38,700 After motion and second the v ote on this resolution was as fallows: Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Doug Coward xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF JANUARY, 2002. ATTEST: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY G:\BUIXiE1\ WP\ResolutionsI02·resoII02-0 I MsqNOAAGrant '-'>i ....tI ~i;¡ >.> ~¡H / >i ili i ili ¡i C ii ii '. l!) ii 0) oi" <0 i , C <¡li ..¡.'. ~ c C 'ò- ....> rn <0 Iii· .2 l!) I.··.>· (.) 6 t:: lij;i rn C") C/) C\. <0 en ~.: , C\. 0::: C/) ii S >¡.'. 0 .... Q .... W ~ ~ Ii l!) ZN ~ 'ò- rn .... 0<;' Q) -"r"" . .i E9. ene !zi .... ene ¡I! -NN W d :æo:::e ~I>··i.· < :æ«Ñ Wi". ï:: .. ~> Q) ow~ ii .§ ii. 0>-.... ...Ji c.. W >-...Je ë t:: m ii ~·i;¡ :J 1-« W i> 0 ~ Zo .. 0 ..ii' ~ ~ => ::>enW z Oi Z W W 0-1- ~ Wi. Z ~ ~ OLL« >i Z··· .2 z o:::C ~ 0 Q. => LLOI- 0 g:i. :C¡:i E " 0 aLL en u ~ :J tI) u W c.. iii. W Q.tI) U CI-w 0:: D::i¡ (.) Q) ~ <i "_ t:: 0::: en::> ii .¡,¡ Q) «wO (.) .;:: ·i Q)~ O::>w ii _ 0 mOO::: ./ ~:ê Q) Q) >-W« .i ,J!!...... I-O:::c tI) t:: tI) Q) ZI-Z .... tI) E ::>zw Q) Q) owe> i. :sg> o:æ« ,i .£9 c: i en rn w9: ~ E -::> ii Q1:I 00 i. i CD ~ 3w ." Q ,i g~ ....: ~ I Orn :::> r< :J en i Q .....t:r -J -J o ~ 0 °iii.···¡ Ü Q),J!! ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ < <i ~ .i ..c:: Q) i ~ :>- 0 0 ct e ü ü [j e e ~ ï::~ ~.- 'ò- S S Q c CD~ co CD .... 0' 0' c <:(Q. c-:.. C/) C/) c 0) 0 C\. - ð E c 0 0 0 0' ~ ~ ",' Z;.., <ct l.U .. .··i··. :it ~> z 0 ¡:.: =» z W 0 0 0:: Z ¡:.: ~i ¡:: ~ W z <iil < z :E z W u W ~ º ". ~ tü>~ ü: ~ c.. ~ < 5Q .... :5 8i ¡:: c.. en => W ~ 0 => ..... => 0 0 0 W m "") W '" ...." fa CI) ::; lLJ 0:: C Il) 0> 0 (Q , < C "B C C '<t (t (Q :::> Il) U C c:: (t <'1 CI) C\, (Q C/) ~ , C\, a:: $: 0 ...... CI) 0.. ...... W ~ ~ Il) ZN '- "t (t ...... 09 (I) -.... .:.: ~ C/)e ...... C/)e z -NN W Q :!:a::e :E < :!:«Ñ w ..... (.) c:: Ow£':! :s (I) it:: u>-.... c.. i5 w ~~e ë <:: [Q w :::> w a:: 0 :E ZU" c ;: .§ ::::I :JC/)w z ë z w w 0-.... :E w z '- I- ULL« > z .E z a::c :E 0 Q. ::::I LLO.... 0 a:: ~ ~ . 0 °LLC/) U 0- :::> V,) U W 0- W o.~ u c....w a:: < ~ ,g á5 ~ a::C/):J «wo 1:5 .~ (I)..... o:Jw - (.) ~~ mOa:: Q) Q) ~w« Q)..... ..... <:: a::c V,) Q) Z....Z V,) ~ V,) Q) :JZW ~t» owC) .S: (t u:!:« (t <:: ..... (1) wc.. V,) E ~"tJ -:J 0.. <:: Uo (9 (1) 3w ~ 8~ ....= CCij :::> r-..- :::> C/) Q ....tr -J -J o '- 0 0 (.) Q),iI¡ g: g: ~ ~ ~ ..c:: Q) < < (.) ¡: ::. 0 0 lJJ æ e (.) (.) Ld 2 2 à: ~~ (t '- Il) s S '-:::: co <.9 c (9 '§: ...... a a c , CI) CI) C 0> '<1:0. C\, C C\, - 6~ c 0 0 c ...... a :¿ :¿ r-..- ~ <0.. lLJ .:.: :it z 0 .:.: ::::I z W 0 0 a:: z .:.: :E ¡::: I- W :E z < < z z W I- U W I- :E :E a:: 0 w ¡¡: < ëi5 0- C) ¡::: º= c.. :> 5 c VI ::::I W 0 ::::I ::::I 0 c E w [Q "'") w '- ...,¡ . @ C/) S;; ...... LlJ .; a::: ii :i Vi ; ,if a IV <l) 0) 1 <0 , 0 I· a a <: "B a IV "I- <0 , ctI <l) I·i. :::J , 13 a t: C'} ctI C\ Ii: C/) <0 , .. i; ~_. C\ CIJ ~ .... s: Ii &. ~ 0:: C/) <l) W ~. ~ "- "I- ZN ctI ..... 0'9 Q) - ..... ¡:.: e:!. ClJo ~ ClJo .. ZI. ci -NN W :::!:o::o :¡;. <: :::!:«Ñ ~·..i·.·:· t: it:: Q) OW~ ctl .g W (,)>-..... ...J a.. I. CO ~~o Ö < t: :¡; .... WI; :::J W 0:: 1 ... 0 :J C ~I Q Z ZU" Z ..... ..§ :J(/)W C Wi ~ 0-1- W Wv Z.·:.···· "- Z (,)LL« :¡; > Z· .E :J o::C :¡; 0 -Iv. Q 0 0 0:: '.. E . () LLOI- () a.. ~Iß. :::J CI) () °LL(/) W a..i·i WI. Q:ß ~ CI-W 0:: ct. 0:: 1 . .g åi -I· o::(/):J ...... ¡.. -;:,. i t> '_ «WO Q)- I. _ t> O:JW i. .V ~:ê moO:: Q) Q) Q)- >-W« · - t: CI) Q) I-O::C CI) E ZI-Z · CI) Q) :JZW ~OJ owe> ii i···· ·s ctI I ctI t: (,):::!:« - ctI · I·· CI) E w!:!: · I ~~ -:J · a.. t: (,)0 ; <.!>ctI 3w v< ~ g~ .. aCti ¡....: .. ",- :::J ::::> ....tJ- (/) ...... a.. o "- ....J ....J (.) Q)-S 0 0 g: g: ~ ~ ~ ..c:: Q) <: <: .... (.) ~ ;:,. 0 0 LlJ ct e (.) (.) ¡¡j t:~ e 0 ~ <0 !:::v ~ '- co :5 a.. <.!>~ ~ :::¡ (!) a , G G a q::Q ~ a 0) C/) C/) a C\Ì ð E G 0 0 a ~ <:ct LlJ ~ ~ ",- t.<') ¡:.: :it; 0 Z W ¡:.: :J Z 0:: 0 0 ~ Z ¡:.: :¡; ¡::: Z W Z ct·.. ct W :¡; Z ..... W ~ ... U :¡; ~ :¡; W ü: a.. 2. a.. C) ... l- S ct en S C< 0 a.. :;: (f) W ß :J ... ::¡ W C C CO ., '-" .." INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this _ day of ,2002, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "County", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT, a special taxing district, hereinafter referred to as "District". WHEREAS, the County has been awarded a Coastal Impact Assistance Program grant by the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Award No. NA170Z2138), hereinafterreferred to as the "NOAA grant", for a project to assist in the reintegration of the Bear Point coastal wetlands into the Indian River Lagoon ecosystem, hereinafter referred to as the "Project"; and, WHEREAS, the Project will benefit the District's land management operations; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the projected benefit of the Project for mosquito control, the District is willing to assist the County in the financial and administrative responsibilities under the NOAA grant. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act. 2. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. The County shall execute an agreement with NOAA for the NOAA grant. The parties shall coordinate activities in the Project area in accordance with the MOU between the County and NOAA. 1- '-' ...." 3. DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES. The District shall provide oversight for the Project on behalf of the County. The parties shall coordinate Project activities in accordance with the terms of the MOD between the County and NOAA. 4. AMENDMENT. The Agreement may only be amended by a written document signed by all parties and filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of 81. Lucie County, Florida. 5. TERl"VIINA nON. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon one hundred eighty (180) days prior written notice to the other party. 6. NOTICES. All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall in writing (induding telex and telegraphic communication) and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested, and addressed to: As to District: With a copy to: 81. Lucie County Mosquito Control Director 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 S1. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Building Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 As to County With a copy to: County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Building Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Building Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered: (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date telecommunicated if by telegraph, ( c) on the date of transmission with 2- "'" -...I confirmed answer back ifby telex, and (d) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 7. AUDIT. The County agrees that District or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any'directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the County involving transactions related to this Agreement. The District agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the District involving transactions related to this Agreement. 8. PUBLIC RECORDS. The County and the District shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by them in conjunction with this Agreement. 9. ASSIGNMENT. No party shall assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm without first obtaining the other parties' approval. 10. FILING. This Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, prior to its effectiveness. 11. GENERAL. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained therein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. 3- '-' """ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized officials as of the dates below stated. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CLERK DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ATTEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS COUNTY ATTORNEY g:\atty\agreemnt\interl oc\m cd.noaa.02. wpd 4- .-.. ...." COASTAL IMPACT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROPOSAL APPLICATION I COUNTY: Sf. Lucie I ClAP PROJECT ID#: 56 Project Title: Bear Point Sanctuary Coastal Wetland Restoration County Contact Name: Street Address: Jody Rosier Bonet, Grants Writer City, State, Zip: Fax: 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 .Fax 566/462-2131 Phone 561/462-1592 E-Mail: rosierj@stlucieco.gov Approximate Project Location: South Hutchinson Island, South of the F1. Pierce Inlet and the City of Ft. Pierce in southern S1. Lucie County Total Project Costs: Budget Schedule: $63,273 Please complete Project Budget Schedule, page 3 ClAP PROJECT PURPOSE and DESCRIPTION (Maximum 1-112 Pages) Attach, if applicable: Site Location Map & Project Site Plan The Bear Point Sanctuary Project site, is a (600+/- acres) coastal-fringing, mangrove swamp and high marsh wetland habitat, located along the eastern shore of a back-barrier island on the Indian River Lagoon. The wetland is reticulated by tidal creeks, ponds, swales and old mosquito ditches. The marsh is bounded on the west by an earthen perimeter spoil benn or dike approximately 15.24 m (50 feet) in width. Pre-project tidal exchange between the estuary and the wetlands of the site, was initially generated via a total of ten, 75 cm (30 inch) diameter, corrugated, aluminum culverts. The majority of the culverts (eight) were installed on county property. which is a contiguous park area owned by the state and county-managed (aka. Green Turtle Beach). The taxonomic results of observations made by the District biologists, and via short-term studies of the wetland by other scientists, identified 23 species of fish, 16 species of birds and several species of crustaceans, mollusks and mammals, which were utilizing the wetland area. Several of these species, such as the Woodstork, Roseate spoonbill, White ibis, Louisiana tricolor heron, several species of Egrets and Herons, and Brown pelicans, have been listed as Species of Special Concern, Threatened or Endangered. The Common Snook and Tarpon, fish Species of Special Concern, are also abundant in the waters of the marsh. '-" ..." ClAP Proiect Purpose and Description (continued) The dominant vegetative species within the wetland are Red and Black mangroves interspersed with small patches of Saltwort and Glasswort (salt-tolerant herbaceous shrubs). Bear Point and other mangrove swamps and high salt-marsh constitute much of the remaining natural habitat along the Indian River Lagoon, and perform necessary and vital functions (nursery, productivity, pollutant cleansing, etc.) for the coastal ecosystem. The combination of preservation and conservation goals (for these coastal wetlands) has been achieved through the public acquisition objective. With the fmancial assistance of Florida Communities Trust and County land acquisition programs, public ownership permits the conservation of, and protection of, I the wetlands of the site. Through the Coastal Impact Assistance Program (ClAP) funds the second I major objective of the Bear Point project can be achieved which is the re-integration of the coastal wetlands of Bear Point into the Indian River Lagoon (IRL) ecosystem. The ClAP funds will be used to assist in the purchase and installation of one pump station with three pumps connecting the IRL with the Bear Point Impoundment. The proposed restoration or re-integration objectives of the project, include; increased tidal exchange, inqeased exchange of natural productivity, enhanced marine faunal nursery functions and improved water quality. Such proposed improvements restore the natural scope and character of this ecotone, resulting in increased habitat quality, and therefore, increased species diversity, at both the site, and for the near shore waters of this Estuary of National Significance. Restoration of natural hydrodynamics, and the water management improvement programs proposed for the site, target an increase in low marsh functions of the wetlands. These activities generate an increased area of stable, high water quality for marine fishes and increase the duration and frequency of natural tidal inundations, Thus, natural growth of juvenile fish takes place over 4-6 month-long (or shorter) artificial water management periods, and 6-8 month-long (or longer) tidally exchanging periods, following introduction of management and reintegration into the estuarine ecosystem. With the advent of flow-through circulation improvement techniques, tidal waters are induced to constantly circulate through the wetland, and continuously exchange with the estuary. This effort results in unprecedented fish nursery functions being imparted to the marsh. Such success takes advantage of existing perimeter canals, which act as tidal creeks, and creates the theoretical basis for the enhancement programs of coastal fish stocks at Bear Point (which is currently under study). Public ownership results in public awareness, public education and public recreational opportunities. Access to the Indian River Lagoon, previously limited by private landownership, is enhanced through public trails and nature walks. Opportunities to study and experience nature are provided, and educational and awareness programs can gain a toe-hold in previously inaccessible coastal areas, Fishermen and bird-watchers, canoers, visitors using wheelchairs and cyclists, can now enjoy recreational lands so important to the cultural development of a community. Since the St. Lucie Mosquito Control District is responsible for the management of 5000 acres of coastal wetlands, their staffwill professionally manage the ClAP funds and ensure that this project is permitted and completed in a timely manner. In addition, the District was awarded the Secretary's Environmental Award from DEP in 1990, the National Association of Counties, Achievement Award for Mosquito Control in 1991 and the Director was named S1. Lucie County Environmentalist of the Year in 1999 by the Conservation Alliance of St. Lucie County. Thus, the ClAP funds will be wisely used to benefit coastal species. 2 \w.. ...", PROJECT BUDGET SCHEDULE lIar amounts only in applicable categories and leave others blank (round to the nearest , 0 cents please). Budget Category ClAP Funds 1. Salaries 0.00 2. Fringe Benefits 0.00 3. Travel 0.00 4. Equipment $38.700 5. Supplies 0.00 6. Contractual Services $10.000 7. Construction $14.573 8. Land Acquisition 0.00 Florida Communities Trust assisted in Acquisition 9. Other 0.00 10. Indirect Charges 0.00 Total Project Costs: $63,273 PROJECT BUDGET NARRATIVE Please describe line items for each applicable budget category shown on the budget schedule above. Provide sufficient detail to show relationship between costs and project activities. Salaries: $0.00 Fringe Benefits: $0.00 Travel: $0.00 Equipment: $ 38,700.00 Cost oftbree pumps for the Impoundment 1 (Bear Point) site. 3 'w "'!IfIÎ Supplies: $0.00 Contractual Services: $10.000.00 Cost of electrical contracting for three 20 HP pumps. Construction: $14.573.00 Materials cost for construction of 1 pump station. Land Acquisition: $0.00 Other: $0.00 Indirect Costs: $0.00 COASTAL IMPACT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROJECT CHECKLIST 1. Project Eligibility Please identify which of the following purposes will be served by the proposed use of ClAP funds: _X_ activities which support and are consistent with the Coastal Zone Management Act, including National Estuarine Research Reserve programs, the National Marine Sanctuaries Act, the Magnuson-Ste\"ens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, or the National Estuaries Program; _X conservation, restoration, enhancement or protection of coastal or marine habitats including wetlands, estuaries, coastal barrier islands, coastal fishery resources and coral reefs, including projects to remove abandoned vessels or marine debris that may adversely affect coastal habitats; _X protection, restoration and enhancement of coastal water quality consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Zone Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.), including the reduction or monitoring of coastal polluted runoff or other coastal contaminants; _ addressing watershed protection or other coastal or marine conservation neèds which cross-jurisdictional boundaries; _ assessment, research, mapping and monitoring of coastal or marine resources and habitats, including, where appropriate, the establishment and monitoring of marine protected areas; _ addressing coastal conservation needs associated with seasonal or otherwise transient fluctuations in coastal populations; _ protection and restoration of natural coastline protective features, including control of 4