The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 01-15-02 '-" ~1Jt~vU 's C{}P1( JANUARY 15, 2002 ,7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- ÞJI Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. \.,.. .....,¡ REGULAR AGENDA January 15, 2002 PAGE nvo 1U11I.J1IlWtl ~ COUNTY ATTORNEY ~,-O ~A. ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS LL, i~~ -- Vu.o{.,\Th- ~/-~ - ~d Resolution No. 02 -01 / Revised Guidelines - Industrial Development Revenue Bonds - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution as drafted. PUBLIC WORKS ~ River Branch Estates / Resolution No. 02-023 / Potable Water Improvements (PSL ~ß.v\f\.W*'D'\' '\f\l Utilities) - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution to levy a non-ad , ' ~. ~alorem special assessment of the River Branch Estates Municipal Services Benefit vJ is ~ Unit, approve the preliminary assessment roll, and authorize staff to proceed \vith 5-0 construction of the project. (2nd Public Hearing) , ~1UNITY DEVELOPMENT 5C. Resolution No. 02- 028 / Verizon Wireless /Quasi- Tudicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 120 foot monopole telecommunications tower in the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 du/acre). Location: 8803 Indrio Road 5·-0 p~ TO QQ.,. Sl5I. Silver Lakes / Preliminary Planned Unit Development /Quasi- Tudicial - Consider ?íO~ staff recommendation to decline to proceed with the requested extension and ,--Pn'I.Yl,L~ determine that the project be sent back to the Planning and Zoning Commission '\). V) 'Yyì l fpr further r~ ^ _ n \ 6, \ lC0Tî I 't:, .-1. ~ f\J D \1 Q..-tc,.. ól J-tC..:{'1 'trl- ~0---yL.. -:::b:-"Yì'Y1CksF. Resolution No. 02-025 / Palm Breezes Club / Preliminary Planned Unit , ~'\'Lo~~elopment /Quasi-Tudicial - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ~ , _ ,~~fsolution granting preliminary planned development plan approval for the project 10'{ ~ '¡,t(~'Known as Palm Breezes Club Planned Unit Develop¡nent. ,S-o ,,~~ ~ ~().\t lit\- p~ Lr - £¥~~.~ ol¢uI..th) ïqlJ~ SF. Resolution No. 02-024 / Savanna Club Phase V /Quasi- Tudicial - Consider staff j 1\. . ~-{, \1 recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Major Adjustment to an ÇJ'f1JJ S ~ exis,ting Planned Unit Development for the project known as Savanna Club. r¿~ - S.tÚv<VIÃ 5-0 p~ \.... .,¡ REGULAR AGENDA JANUARY IS, 2002 PAGE THREE PUBUC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) I. ~. COM.\IUNITY DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) V C-R- ~I , SG. Ordinance No. 02-004 / Land Development Code Amendment to Section ()~ 1\, {, (II) 3.01.03(Q)(7) Commercial Neighborhood Conditional Uses to Provide for the (j. ~ 'b Establishment and Operation of Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages as an ? Accessory Use to a Restaurant and/or Civic, Social and Fraternal Organization) in the CN (Commercial Neighborhood) Zoning District \,tv+<- Consider staff recommendation to no.t a prove the ordinance. . V-!.¡ ~- err., a~C>.ÀyV)+- (l£~~. ~t)rt adL;:lr)~ - Ç'e..b.5 2oo~\ ~ 1. No \lO-k.~~ e/woA.'vt<. ) v~ (..0; 1\ ..çbt~ J,w ç..u:vt<-Å End of Public Hearings ~\0Q. 7~ IJ'",,_. Jilt. "W"".F'""1I''',_,. --- Y -I Ubýü.k ~') 6. IÌ';VESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE ~~~ South 2 Sth Street Landscaping Improvements (Airoso Boulevard to Midway Road) - þ'- J cJ'V'-- Consider staff recommendation to approve the final design and grant permission ~WW-. '. SoL( to ady~rnsl. ertise for constructio);l in t.he j.,IIlount of S2~50 000. _L . ;S~P' tv:U) ~ PC0(IL ~1r~ l,.'I>-'. ~i~ S1a{hLooll@ ~ 1()~Vb(u..";t,'e.) ~1~ 'C1 ·~H-~~d-.Ifl'iA MMUNITY D~LOPMENL ---\-0, 1'>~ . ~ ~41^-~~ \?v;.. ,:;:,--i"{ ~~) W-VcM s\-, ~ . -r:>o L.l~~_~ -tD -\-t~ ~ ~ /LU:..I.U'-'-X~.J Bc~ _~w- e~o ution No. -..., <;,u Brandon Capital C~p. ¡Quasi- Tudicial- Consider staff , ., filÁrecoffimendation to approve the resolution granting a Major Admustment to a ~ ¡I.,..o- y.ru Major Site Plan Approval for the project known as Sands, Lakeview-Lakeshore and Amenity Site. Location: west side of North SR A-I-A, directly south of the North Hutchinson Island Wastewater Treatment Facility in the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District and adjacent to the west right -of-way of North SR A-I-A 'v(~ 5-ù ~tw.-~ - '-tf)Wf¡ Ù~ ~~:> - s..e ~( 8. ADMINISTRATION C,ÛW1 rY\. Jk, I~ A. \/Q.tÅÁ/~1~d . ŒJ ~~ rynoftv ~ Amtrak East Coast Passenger Service Project - Consider staff recommendation to appoint a Commissioner to act as a liaison to actively follow and participate in the ongoing Amtrak project. Educational Campaign and Legislative Strategy - Staff is requesting Board direction on the Florida Association of Counties request to provide coverage in the local newspaper as well as submission of a Letter to the Editor regarding the Educational Campaign and Legislative Strategy. \wt; ..,J CONSENT AGENDA Tanuarv IS. 2002 J V~:)' 0 l~I,~,"~ ~\)\) D\\f 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. IS 2. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Engineering / Harmony Heights Stormwater Master Plan - Consider staff recommendation to approve Work Authorization NO.3 with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., in the amount of $66,23S.20, for the development of a stormwater master plan, and authorize the chairman to sign the work authorization. B. Engineering / Orange Avenue and Header Canal Bridge Replacement Project / Con Span Bridge System - Consider staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $41,202.20 for a total contract price of $640,119.60 to Murphy Construction Company to complete the modification to the project. 3. PURCHASING A. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise a Request For Proposals (RFP) for Parking Garage Management Services for the Downtown Parking Garage. B. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise a Request For Proposals (RFP) for a Continuing Contract for Professional Surveying Services. C. Bid No. 02-011 / Air Stripping Treatment System - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Enviro-Logical Solutions, Inc., in the amount of $33,79S and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. D. Bid No. 02-020 / Spruce Bluff Preserve Boardwalk - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Custom Built Marine Construction, Inc., in the amount of $37,000 and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 02-S1, 02-S2, 02-S3, 02-S4 / South Hutchinson Island Public Utility Easements for Water Facility Improvements - Consider staff recommendation to accept the easements, and authorize the Chairman to sign the resolutions, and direct staff to record the documents in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. B. Resolution No. 02-57 / North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution as drafted. \...r CONSENT AGENDA JANUARY IS, 2002 PAGE TWO ~ S. PUBLIC WORKS, Cost Share Partnership with the City of Port St. Lucie - Consider staff recommendation to approve funding of $10,788.S0 for the construction of a temporary sidewalk from Port. St. Lucie High School to Walton Road, and grant permission to reallocate funds from the Oleander Bike Path Project (will be funded in FY 2002-2003). 6. AIRPORT / UTILITIES Fire Suppression Improvement Project at St. Lucie County International Airport - Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract and professional services agreement with PBS&J in the amount of $91,800 for the design and preparation of construction drawings. 7. CENTRAL SERVICES Administration Building Construction Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the work authorization for Edlund & Dritenbas in the amount of $176,308, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement as prepared by the County Attorney. '-' -.I JANUARY 15,2002 '·7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There \\ill be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item \\ill not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissiorier or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- ÞJI Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-" ~ www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA January IS, 2002 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ,1. MINUTES Approve the min~tes of the meeting held January 8,2002. 2. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS / ANNOUNCEMENTS . A. Senator Ken Pruitt will award checks for Community Budget Funding Requests. B. Resolution No. 02- S8 proclaiming the month of January "Mentor Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida. B. Announcement / There will be a J oint Meeting with the City of Port St. Lucie on March 14, 2002 at 3:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. C. Announcement / The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Strategic Planning Session at 8:00 am on February 1,2002 at St. Lucie West Country Club in Port St. Lucie. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boarilat these meetings will need a record ofthe proceedmgs and for such purpose may neeo to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any par1J to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone '\\ith a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at [east forty-eight(48) hours prior fo the meeting. '-' ....,¡ REGULAR AGENDA January IS, 2002 PAGE TWO IfHlJtna PUBLIC HEARINGS COUNTY ATTORNEY SA. Resolution No. 02-01 / Revised Guidelines - Industrial Development Revenue Bonds - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution as drafted. PUBLIC WORKS SB. River Branch Estates / Resolution No. 02-023/ Potable 'Vater Improvements (PSL Utilities) - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment of the River Branch Estates Municipal Services Benefit Unit, approve the preliminary assessment roll, and authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project. (2nd Public Hearing) COMMUNITY DE\'ELOPMENT Sc. Resolution 1\'0. 02- 028 / Verizon Wireless /Quasi- Tudicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 120 foot monopole telecommunications tower in the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 dujacre). Location: 8803 Indrio Road SD. Silver Lakes / Preliminary Planned Unit Development jQuasi- Tudicial - Consider staff recommendation to decline to proceed with the requested extension and determine that the project be sent back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further review. SE. Resolution No. 02-02S / Palm Breezes Club / Preliminary Planned Unit Development /Quasi- Tudicial - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting preliminary planned development plan approval for the project known as Palm Breezes Club Planned Unit Development. SF. Resolution No. 02-024 / Savanna Club Phase V jQuasi- Tudicial - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Major Adjustment to an existing Planned Unit Development for the project known as Savanna Club. "" .....¡ REGULAR AGENDA JANUARY 15, 2002 PAGE THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) .:1'\Ý y/ I SG. Ordinance No. 02-004 / Land Development Code Amendment to Section 3.01.03(0)(7) Commercial Neighborhood Conditional Uses to Provide for the Establishment and Operation of Drinking Places (Alcoholic Be\'erages as an Accessory Use to a Restaurant and/or Civic, Social and Fraternal Organization) in the CN (Commercial Neighborhood) Zoning District :Á,9Bslder staff recommendation to not approve the ordinance. -::,ty. . 9"1~/ I... .___n.o.-"...-", __-. . End of Public Hearings V· i·t iD~WO . þfljJ·IYil./{!If4í /.. ¡1.)J ~~aí:;-" INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE '" JrI'h-;;í-;;.·:~1 ..' r .~~~ 1/ ¡y- / South 25th Street Landscaping Improvements (Airoso Boulevard to ?-.Iidway Road) - Consider staff recommendation to approve the final design and grant permission to advertise for construction in the amount of $250,000. 7. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 02- 027 / Brandon Capital Corp. /Quasi-Tudicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Major Admustment to. a Major Site Plan Approval for the project known as Sands, Lakeview-Lakeshore and Amenity Site. Location: west side of North SR A-I-A, directly south of the North Hutchinson Island Wastewater Treatment Facility in the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District and adjacent to the west right-of-way of North SRA-I-A 8. ADMINISTRATION A. Amtrak East Coast Passenger Service Project - Consider staff recommendation to appoint a Commissioner to act as a liaison to actively follow and participate in the ongoing Amtrak project. J B. ~\ Educational Campaign and Legislative Strategy - Staff is requesting Board direction on the Florida Association of Counties request to provide coverage in the local newspaper as well as submission of a Letter to the Editor regarding the Educational Campaign and Legislative Strategy. ~ CONSENT AGENDA Tanuary 15.2002 ..,¡ 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 15 2. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Engineering / Harmony Heights Stormwater Master Plan - Consider staff recommendation to approve Work Authorization NO.3 with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., in the amount of S66,23S.20, for the development of a stormwater master plan, and authorize the chairman to sign the work authorization. B. Engineering / Orange Avenue and Header Canal Bridge Replacement Project / Con Span Bridge System - Consider staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign Change Order No. 1 in the amount of S41, 2 02 .20 for a total contract price of $640,119.60 to Murphy Construction Company to complete the modification to the project. 3. PURCHASING A. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise a Request For Proposals (RFP) for Parking Garage Management Services for the Downtown Parking Garage. B. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise a Request For Proposals (RFP) for a Continuing Contract for Professional Surveying Services. C. Bid No. 02-011 / Air Stripping Treatment System - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Enviro-Logical Solutions, Inc., in the amount of $33,79S and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. D. Bid No. 02-020 / Spruce Bluff Preserve Boardwalk - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Custom Built Marine Construction, Inc., in the amount of 537,000 and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 02-S1, 02-S2, 02-S3, 02-S4 / South Hutchinson Island Public Utility Easements for Water Facility Improvements - Consider staff recommendation to accept the easements, and authorize the Chairman to sign the resolutions, and direct staff to record the documents in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. B. Resolution No. 02-S7 / North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution as drafted. ~ CONSENT AGENDA j.;\!,\¡UARY 15, 2002 PAGE TWO ....., S. PUBLIC WORKS. Cost Share Partnership with the City of Port St. Lucie - Consider staff recommendation to approve funding of 510,788.S0 for the construction of a temporary sidewalk from Port. St. Lucie High School to Walton Road, and grant permission to reallocate funds from the Oleander Bike Path Project (will be funded in FY 2002-2003). 6. AIRPORT / UTILITIES Fire Suppression Improvement Project at St. Lucie County International Airport - Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract and professional services agreement with PBS&J in the amount of 591,800 for the design and preparation of construction drawings. / . CENTRAL SERVICES Administration Building Construction Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the work authorization for Edlund & Dritenbas in the amount of $176,308, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement as prepared by the County Attorney. v ....¿ BOARD OF CQUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLQRIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: January 8, 2002 Tape: 1-2 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjourned: 11 :00 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes, Paula A. Lewis, Frannie Hutchinson, John D. Bruhn Others P~esent: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Marie Gouin, M & B Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Pete Keogh, Parks and Recreation Director, Dennis Wetzel, I T Director, Roger Shinn, Central Services Director, Mike Bowers, Asst. Public Works Director, Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager, Don West, County Engineer, David Kelly Planning Manager, Sheriff Mascara, Steve Sessoms, Deputy, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES ~ It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held December 18,2001; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATIONSIPRESENTATION A. Resolution No.02-06 was moved to the end of the agenda. B. Announcement!There will be a public workshop on the Manatee Protection Plan on January 15, 2002 at 4:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers. C. Announcement / There will be joint meeting with the City of Port St. Lucie on March 14,2002 at 3:30 p.m. in the Commission Chambers. D. Announcement! The following public workshops have been scheduled for the Community Parks System Master Plan: January 8,20025:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. - Ft. Pierce Library January 8, 2002 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.- SLC Commission Chambers January 9, 2002 5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. - White City Improvement Club January I), 2002 7:00 p.m. - ():OO p.m. - Morningside Library January 10, 2002 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.- Lakewood Park Library E. Announcement! The scheduled meeting with the City of Ft. Pierce on January 29, 2002 from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers has been cancelled and will be rescheduled. F. Announcement! The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Strategic Planning Session at 9:00 a.m. on February I, 2002 at 81. Lucie West Country Club in Port 81. Lucie, 3. GENERAL PUBLIC CQMMENT8 Mr. Jim Powell, 3352 Perimeter Road, Palm City, addressed the Board regarding item 6B He questioned if it was a budgeted item or a proposed expenditure with an agreement that it would be funded through the general fund. 1 "'" '-' ....¿ The County Administrator addressed Mr. Powell's questions regarding the legal advertisements. The Purchasing Director advised Mr. Powell on the cost of the advertisements in the newspapers for the year 2000 and 2001. Mr. Powell questioned why this was not handled with a piggy back provision as other contracts have been. He questioned the properties which have been brought to sale and the advertising fees being paid by the BCC. The County Attorney addressed Mr. Powell's questions and stated he would discuss the cost also with the Clerk of Courts who assesses certain fees and passes them on to the BCC. Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island, congratulated the BCC on the "touch and go" action taken this past year. He asked the Board question the Flight Schools what is the benefit of a "touch and go" which has no real use in regular flying, it is only a short cut. Mr. Grande also commented on the Port Master Plan. He felt the second version of the Master Plan does not state the citizens input on the plan. There is an effort in Tallahassee to have to Port Authority named for this area which will take the BCC out of the picture. He aSked that the BCC request their lobbyist go to Tallahassee and register the BCC's disapproval of House Bill 257 and the companion piece that Senator Pruitt is pushing in the Senate. He felt these are a clear attempt to eliminate citizen participation. Mr. Bob Bangert advised the Board that the bills are Senate Bill 270 and 280 and House Bill 257. Com. Coward stated his concerns about the bills and requested the Board have an opportunity to review the bills before they state their position. Mr. Robert Anderson, county resident, congratulated the Board on their action with the "touch and go" problem and stated the noise has decreased around his residence. He also questioned the televising of the meetings. The County Administrator stated they were hoping to start by the 1st of December. 4. CONSENT AGENDA (1900) It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the Consent Agenda; with item C6A and C8A pulled; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 12 through 14. 2. PARKS AND RECREATION A. Interlocal Agreement with St. Lucie County and the St. Lucie County Fire Department- The Board approved the agreement for emergency medical services at the St. Lucie County Sports Complex and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement. B. Bid No. 02-003- Cleaning Services for Thomas J. White Sports Complex- The Board approved awarding the bid to Building Services Industries, LLC, approved the contract as prepared by the County Attorney, and authorized the Chainnan to sign the contract. C. Equipment Request No. 02-175/ The Board approved the equipment request for the purchase of a Kronos timeclock in the amount of $2,629.25 to be utilized by Parks Maintenance Personnel. 2 '""V..l.............,J ....'-"~..a.......¡,... \.II. ........................ ~""-~.............. _................... ......'V...,v..... 001217 001249 001265 001266 00i269 001809 101 101001 101002 101003 101006 102 102001 102104 - -; 107001 107002 107003 140 140001 140121 140307 140309 140310 140312 142 145815 160 183 183001 183002 183004 183106 184203 184804 185002 301 310002 ~ 1 6 001 316101 382 389 395 396 397 398 ~01 118 ~21 H1 H8 ~49 ~51 161 171 191 50S 505001 ;06 ;11 - , DEP-Regiona~~tenuation Facility Section 8 Gr~t FY 99/00 TDC Planning Grant FY01/02 .CTD TRIP Grant FY01/02 FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transporêation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU FOOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper Port & Airport Fund Port Fund- FAA Taxiway A-3, Airfield Signage Con st. Parking Apron#405823-1-94-01 Installation #236741-1-94-01 Airfield Signage #408784-1-94-01 (FDOT) Taxiway A-3 Phase I Const. Port MSBU Development Fund SFWMD IRL 2001 License Plate Grant plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Adm~n.-County Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Domestic Relations Hearing FYOO-03 Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration FIND So. Causeway Shoreline Stabil. SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 So. County Regional Stadium Impact Fees-Parks County Capital Transportation Capital Ocean Bay public access,dune crosso Environmental Land Capital Fund Rouse Road MSBU Capital River Branch MSBU Capital Lennard Road 1 - Roadway Capital Lennard Road 2 - Water Capital Lennard Road 3 - Sewer Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities Renewal & Replacement Fund Capital Facilities Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No Countý Utility District-Operatin Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Shared Poo+ Cash-Property Appraiser Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: ..J I uv I . U" 7,650.00 8,684.76 232.15 16,680.48 265.08 355.71 76,867.26 1,939.92 322.00 39,077.01 757.40 17,562.02 4,517.43 165.57 477.71 281,240.42 185.58 23,190.71 84.74 13,684.18 26,672.49 136,008.67 210,4,64.64 5,289.23 9,822.85 24,543.01 28,786.03 355.77 1,331.45 803.86 738.32 505.00 640.77 6,312.48 12,164.94 3,581.38 36,830.76 9,625.63 3,743.47 45,105.77 - 36,720.89 10,299.99 5,202.62 1,464.00 243.67 198.24 205.32 202.96 37,593.26 30,273.01 2,044.61 19,501.11 3,575.79 575,257.00 25,281.34 12,762.21 15,340.19 7,277.61 572.75 405.47 50,000.00 37,136.01 10,077.07 2,220,934.71 '"±"±O.OI ....., 0.00 0.00 2,607.11 0.00 1,227.64 1,227.64 108,164.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,850.79 4,461.31 1,142.60 1,322.21 57,194.10 848.57 35,228.92 0.00 7,369.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,441.68 .3,772.12 2,423.83 0.00 '2,952.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,558.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,319.18 21,759.51 199.76 4,194.37 0.00 0.00 813.26 8,836.99 .5,292.88 21,798.58 881.24 1,886.86 0.00 3,410.96 0.00 833,797.90 12/28/01 FZABWARR FUND 001 001139 001140 001143 001265 001269 001809 101 101003 102 102001 102104 105 107 107001 107002 111 112 113 114 115 " ' ,- ~ 118 119 120 121 122 123 126 127 136 138 139 140 140001 145815 160 183 183001 183004 185002 242 310002 316 401 .118 441 451 461 471 478 491 505 505001 611 '-' .----J ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD DATA ...¿ WARRANT LIST #13- 22-DEC-2001 TO 28-'DEC-2001 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FHA Transportation for 21st Century Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 -Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 TDC Planning Grant FY01/02 FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/Local Option Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage" Maintenance MSTU FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine &'Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Fórfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar River Park I Fund J River Park II Fund Harmony Heights 3 Fund Harmony Heights 4 Fund Sheraton Plaza Fund Sunland Gardens Fund Sunrisè Park Fund Paradise Park Fund Holiday Pines Fund The Grove Fund Blakely Subdivision Fund Indian River Estates Fund Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund Southern Oak Estates Lighting Pine Hollow Street Lighting MSTU Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund Palm Grove Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund SFWMD IRL 2001 License Plate Grant Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 Port I&S Fund Impact Fees-Parks County Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund GRAND TOTAL: J .,,; EXPENSES 824,503.77 32.95 96.08 33.26 195.41 91.52 93.92 14,073.81 9,486.00 4,819.20 372.44 85.00 , 94.08 436,784.16 64.52 2,630.57 2,744.86 546.23 215.77 470.20 22.64 525.51 131.08 35.48 773.47 161.72 3.95 916.89 269.59 11 7.56 330.21 1,385.25 113.12 704.38 2,016.43 20,000.00 1,064.31 179.43 618.19 303.39 221.07 10,375.33 1,326.05 6,027.84 3,817.03 9,869.47 5,551.51 3,404.16 5,028.55 2,265.60 3,983.63 5,314.19 475.20 2,352.93 148,620.11 139.67 253.54 1,536,132.23 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/04/02 FZABWARR FUND 001 001139 001140 001143 001265 001268 001269 001809 101 101003 102 102001 102104 103 105 107 107001 107002 107003 140 140001 , '0307 ,314 140315 140800 145815 160 183 183001 183004 183211 183214 185002 205 282 316 316001 401 418 421 441 451 461 471 491 505 505001 625 v ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ..., PAGE 1 WARRANT LIST #14- 29-DEC-2001 TO 04-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FHA Transportation for 21st Century Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 TDC Planning Grant FY01/02 01/02 Haz Mat DCA Grant FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/Local Option Unincorporated Services Fund Drainagê Maintenance MSTU FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Law Entorcement MSTU Library special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Const. Parking Apronff405823-1-94-01 Airport Utilities Imp. / FDOT Airport Drainage Master Plan- FDOT IRL Taylor Creek Restoration SFWMD 8FWMD IRL 2001 License Plate Grant Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat CtAdmin.- Teen Court Civil Traffic Infraction officer st 01/02 08CA Civil Traffice Infractio SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 Beach Bond 1&8 Fund Environmental Land 1&8 Fund County Capital Transportation Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv.Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 142,034.50 36.36 206.03 33.21 82.09 5,905.00 88.30 90.95 28,192.94 908.88 13,033.54 7,322.44 93.82 5,,626.11 2,444.85 181,318.14 62.72 3,028.65 52.87 775.02 375.00 4,020.00 4,824.00 <;0,341.00 5,812.80 1,264.29 3,466.20 1,222.28 198.31 432.65 1,488.00 152.00 183.01 4,516.56 8,794.30 958.72 5,891.37 13,317.00 10,717.76 13 .64 1,982.03 1,639.89 24,153.51 2,912.14 46,217.41 2,464.85 1,046.76 1,390.90 5,760.46 586,893.26 PAYROLL 416,649.26 475.20 2,650.21 446.57 1,098.57 0.00 1,188.80 1,188.80 104,577.30 0.00 47,650.69 4,102.66 1,226.40 0.00 2,040.59 58,026.18 829.15 40,530.08 0.00 6,763.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,364.00 3,666.71 1,115.38 2,874.61 0.00 0.00 2,519.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,299.07 .,21,079.28 187.62 3,939.82 753.40 7,917.17 4,971.62 21,002.61 842.40 1,848.02 3.273.88 0.00 804,099.19 v ~ D. Lawnwood Sports Complex and Elks Parks Improvements- The Board approved the contracts with Adron Fence and Andy Edwards Roofing in the total amount of $12,992 as prepared by the County Attorney's office and authorized the Chairman to sign the contracts. E. Resolution No. 02-03/Fees for St. Lucie County Marine Center- The Board approved the resolution amending certain admission and building rental rates. F. Resolution No. 02-04/Amending Resolution No. 00-83/Lending of County Equipment- The Board approved the resolution regarding the mobile stage. G. Equipment Request No. 02-182/Starting Platform- The Board approved the equipment request for the purchase of a starting platform for the Port St. Lucie Pool in the amount of $1 ,300. H. Amendment to Facilities Use Agreement- The Board approved the amendment to allow the New York Mets to assume responsibility of the souvenir/retail operations for the 2002 season as the Thomas J. White Stadium and authorized the Chairman to sign the amendment. 3.' PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-015/Enhanced Swale Maintenance- The Board approved awarding the bid to CEM Enterprises, Inc., at the unit prices bid, and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Bid Waiver and Piggyback Indian River County Reinforced Concrete Pipe Bid No. 4016/ The Board approved the bid waiver and piggybacking of Indian River County Bid No. 4016 Annual Bid for Reinforced Concrete Pipe through the term ofthe contract. C. Resolution No. 02-08- The Board approved adopting the resolution amending the County's Purchasing Manual to amend the upper limit for Purchase Order Contracts to $10,000 and authorized the Chairman to sign the resolution. D. Rental of Color Copier for the Materials Centcr- The Board approved the request and authorized the Chairman to execute the rental agreement. E. Bid No. 02-014/Equipment Request No. 02-161/Trailer Mounted Sewer Cleaning Systems- The Board approved awarding the bid Southem Sewer Equipment Sales, Inc., in the total amount of $59,444 and approved the equipment request for the purchase. F. Bid No. 02-018/Concrete Culvert and Asphalt Installation- The Board approved awarding the bid to South Florida Concrete Services, Inc., at the unit prices bid, and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. G. Budget Amendment No.02-117 Equipment Request Nos. 02-178,02- 179, 02-180, /Purchase of Pipe Handling Equipment - The Board approved the budget amendment and equipment requests to purchase pipe handling equipment in the total amount of$15,500. H. Bid No. 02-017/Researeh Center Road Landscaping- The Board approved rejecting the bid, revising the specifications and re- advertising the bid. 3 \.t "'" I. Bid No. 02-017/Equipment Request No. 02-021/Purchase of One-Top Step Van- The Board approved awarding the bid to Don Reid Ford in the amount of $29,855 and approved the equipment request for the purchase. 1. Bid No. 02-023/Equipment Request No. 02-030/Purchase of Cab & Chassis with Contractors Dump Boy- The Board approved awarding the bid to Gator Ford in the amount of $32,579 and approved the equipment request for the purchase. 4. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE Soutlt 25th S1. Phase II Mitigation Monitoring- The Board approved the work authorization with R.L. Weight Environmental Consultants, Inc., in the amount of $41,455 through September 25, 2005 and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement. 5. ADMfNISTRA nON Budget Amendment No. 02-116/Euipment Request No. 02-176- The Board approved thc budget amcndmcnt and equipment request for the purchase of a dual video deck and monitor from G & G Technologies in the amount of $1,477 to be used by the I\1edia Specialist for producing video productions. 6. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Administration Building Construction Project- This item was pulled. B. Bums International Contract No. 00-10-200 Extension- The Board approved the one year extension. 7. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET A. Budgct Resolution No. 02-07/ Correction of Scrivener Error in Budget Resolution No. 01-296 and 01-297- The Board approved the resolution to correct the fund numbers. B. Budget Resolution No. 02-02/Zora Neal Hurston Dust Track Heritage Trail Project- The Board approved the budget resolution to establish the increased budget for the Cultural Affairs donation in the amount of $600.00. C. Budget Resolution No. 02-09/Derelict Vessel Removal Grant Award- The Board approved the budget resolution to appropriate and expend the funds from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission in the amount of$2,200. D. Budget Resolution No. 02-20/MPQ Section 5303 Grant (Formerly Section 8) - The Board approved accepting the grant award and adopted the budget resolution establishing the increased budget and directed staff to proceed with the resolution establishing the increased budget and directed staff to proceed with the necessary steps to completc ils process. 8. CQUNTY ATTQRNEY A. Resolution No. 02-11,02-12,02-13,02-14,02-15,02-16,02-17,02-18 and 02- 19- Public Utility Easemcnt for Watcr Facility lmprovements- This item was pulled. B. Partial Release of Lien for 8t. Lucie County Cude Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien in Case No. 6622- The Board approved authorizing the Chairman to sign the Partial Release of Lien. 4 v ...." C. Ordinance No. 02-0l/Caribbean Fruit Fly Host Plants- The Board approved advertising the Ordinance as drafted. 9. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HTE, Inc. Support Service Agreement- The Board approved the agreement effective October 1, 2001 through September 30, 2002 in the amount of $54,125 and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement. 10. PUBLIC WORKS A. . Road and Bridge/Resolution No. 02-101US1 & Indrio Road Improvements- The Board adopted the resolution authorizing the Chairman to sign the Joint Project Agreement with the Florida Dept. of Transportation. B. Code Enforcement/Equipment Request No. 02-093 and Equipment Request No. 02-094- The Board approved the equipment requests for the purchase of two network laser printers that were previously priced at $1,447, however that printer is discontinued. The new cost is $2,098.98 each. Additional funding is available from savings on vehicles purchased at a lower cost than originally budgeted. '- 11. CQMMUNITY SERVICES Resolution No. 0] -05- The Board approved the resolution in support of the "Elder Ready Florida" initiative and authorized the Chairman to sign the resolution. REGULAR AGENDA 6. PURCHASING (1-976) A. RFP No. 02-016- Lakewood Park Field Renovations Design/Build- Consider staff recommendation to award the RFP to Recreational Design & Construction, Inc., in the amount of $181,500 and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. Com. Barnes expressed his conccrns with the fact that the local vendor was $64,00 lower than the selected vendor. He does not see this contract to be difficult as to where the local contractor could not handle the project even though his main experience is not in field design and renovations but in extensive golf course projects. He asked Mr. VanMeter to come forward to address staffs concerns, which were the reasons for rccommcnding thc othcr vcndor. Com. Coward requested staff go into more detail as to why the vendor was selected by the committee. The Parks and Recreation Director advised the Board the reasons why the vendor was selected. The decision was based on : a. their experience and the ability to work well with the county in other prior projects b. thc committee felt comfortable with their presentation c. their tuali /ìcations arc cxtcnsive Mr. VanMeter stated that it was his understanding that the scope of work was to stop at the fence line. He stated his company does have design experience, not extensively on baseball fields, but they have master planned a 188 acre site in Reno Nevada for the University of Nevada Golf Course. 5 y "'" Regarding the lighting not being delivered on time, he had placed a call to the area representative and he has state that there is no indication of a delay that he would do whatever needed to complete the job on time. Com. Hutchinson questioned the difference between drainage for a field as opposed to a golf course. Mr. VanMeter addressed Com. Hutchinson's question and stated the golf course requires more extensive work. Com. Bruhn's comments were unintelligible. Mr. VanMeter stated they would like to establish a relationship with the county. Mr. Steve Seems(or Seams) and Mr. Steve Westervelt, Recreational Design Construction, addressed the Board's questions regarding the project. Mr. Seems stated that ball fields are more a complicated project than golf courses. Mr. Westervelt addressed the electrical problems on the exiting lighting and what they intend to do on this ficld. Com:-Coward statcd his support to move forward with staff recommendation. Com. Hutchinson stated her only concern with this was going with the higher bid and the fact that the Board has always pushed for local vendors (balance of comments unintelligible). Com. Lewis' comments were unintelligible on the audio tape. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay's: Bames; Hutchinson, Aye's: Bruhn, Lewis, Coward, motion carried by a vote of3 to 2. B. Legal Advertisements- Consider staff recommendation to approve the amendment to the agreement with Scripps Treasure Coast Publishing Company, reducing the advertising rate from $0.59 to $0.27 per line inch, and authorize the Chainnan to sign the amendment as prepared by the County Attorney. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 7. ADMINISTRATION (1-2800) A. Committee Appointments- It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to ratify the following appointments: Com. Hutchinson - District 4 - Ms. lemma Redman, Historical Commission Com. Barnes- District 5- Mabel Fawsett, Code Enforccment Board At Large Appointmcnt -- Mr. Michael Bausher- Library Advisory Board Com. Lewis' appointments were placed on hold as per her request. And, upon roll call, motion carned unanimously. B. Bi- Weekly Reports- The Board gave updated on the Boards and committees they serve. 6 v ....., . . C. Indian River Lagoon- South Feasibility Study Report- County Comments- Consider staffrecommendation to forward final comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for inclusion within the final report. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 8. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Parcel Purchase Contract- Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract to purchase a 12.32 +/- acre parcel from Atlantic Gulf Communities along the North Fork of the St. Lucie River, authorize the Chairman to sign the contract and addendums, and direct staff to proceed with closing upon the . County Attorney's approval of the due diligence of this property. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the contract with AGC as well as the contract with Mr. Terpening; and, direct staff to proceed with the closing upon the County Attorney's approval; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously B. Indian River Estates Stormwater Retention Project- Bunting Parcel- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Contract for Sale and Purchase authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close transaction and record the document in the Public Records of S1. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. C. Resolution No. 02-22/ North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2001- Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution as drafted. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve Resolution No. 02-22; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. D. Rcsolution No. 02-21/Florida Local Governmcnt Invcstment Trust- Considcr staff recommendation to approve the resolution. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Resolution No. 092- 21; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 9. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Auditor Selection Committee- Consider staff recommendation that the Board advise the constitutional officers of the fact that an auditor selection committee be established in accordance with Florida Statutes, and that the Board designate an individual to represent them on the Auditor Selection Committee. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Lewis, to appoint Com. Bruhn, to the committee; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. A-l- ADMINISTRATION 2002 Joint Legislative Platform/State Tax Reform- Commissioner Coward requested the Board review this issue and this item be brought back for the Board's position. 2.A Resolution No. 02-06 Proclaiming the week of January 20,2002 through January 27,2002 as "Jazz Week 2002" in S1. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 02- OÚ; and, upon roll call, Illotion carried unanimously. 7 "-' '-I *** Note: unintelligible comments have been left out from this meeting due to audio interruptions. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court " 8 Jðn 07 02 05:42p ..., p.2 1+uv ~,:1A ./ THE FLORIDA SENATE Tallahas.¡ee Flonda ~):J9g"7100 COMMnTeliS: '~I~n(¡;¡ i!ld Ta"<8r;M. ::¡'3/-rn::;r, t:.duçetlon HiJ:alth, .~rng i3ìd Lc"¡ç~T€n1'1 Care N.:¡lura' q~sQ\)ft~a R6,aPPO,1Iotlmer:t ~ S:J~c':-'mmiUQe on Le{jiljl.oHve A."iJôrtjn""'h~r.t. or.d n~",:s:, Î¡,,;ll I:J RI3Qvated jM¡Ji:ilj'~ SENATOR KEN PRUITT 27th District JOINT COMMlrreE' Adm~k;~rdtii" PfúçedlJn}~; hlluar)' 7, 2002 Diane: f SI Luçie County - NcrthFork of the St Lucie River Phase _ 775,000,00 . St Luei~ County - Indl10 Scrub Preserve _ 471.50000 . St Lnc!~ Cou:tty - Anck:nt Oaks - 352,400,00 . St Lucie COt:nty, 'Nhile City Fialwoods- 335,000.00 St Lucie County - Sh(~faton PIa:>:. Presût"'c· 606,000,00 5t Lucie County/City of POli St Lucie- 2,055,82500 (2 checks total) , St Lucie Coullty/City ofFt Pierce - S¡¡vanna Buffer Preservc _ 420,QUO.on (2 ch,;cks total) Florida Communities Trust Project Liat ~PLr···O r'J ;'~4C(O S ~,Mi,jPOrf R;J:ad, Su!tt11(¡, Ptlrt St lLlt.ie. F:?tic.a 34952.48()S ':5(1) .j:)S-ðr)(\;J n ~11¡;;; QI?11I.l(¡': f.)ffité E;h.:ill:lin:d 4ú-ii. $.)1,,'\1; r-"jU·U'CI''iI,sIl-eCI. lal!ahõisse.e. !:!t:rida ~2,}99"1100 (65(.)) 467.SQM ~S!¡¡¡8Ialllre's W(¡Ü~lta: t!~J.i~"''''t''\'.I''g.8I~t~..,r.!.M: JOHN M IohCKAV Pra~id"nI ~INNY BROWN-WAITt; President Pro TGmporG FAYE W, ~LANTON Secrét.'Y DOl\l4LD SEVERANCE' SerQean1 at Arms '" '-' "" AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ,;( B DATE: January 15,2002 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIQNERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-58 - Proclaiming the month of January, 2002, as "MENTOR MONTH" in S1. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: Big Brothers Big Sisters of S1. Lucie County has requested that this Board proclaim the month of January, 2002, as Mentor Month in S1. Lucie County, Florida. The attached Resolution No. 02-58 has been drafted for that purpose. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-58 as drafted. [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 5-0 E: COMMISSION ACTION: o sAnderson County Administrator County Attorney, ;v.. Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other, Other, Finance, {Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eft, 5/96 '-" -...,; RESOLUTION NO. 02-58 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 2002, AS "MENTOR MONTH" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. The future course of the State of Florida and our Nation rests on the shoulders of our youth, and educated, confident, nurtured children will give rise to a stronger state and nation. 2. Many of Florida's children are struggling with their education - over 200,000 are suspended each year, over 100,000 students fail to be promoted, and over 30,000 students drop out of school each year. 3. Mentoring is shown to have an enormous impact on youth; as concluded by a National Public Private Venture study which found that mentoring reduced the use of illegal drugs by 46%; reduced the use of underage drinking by 27%, reduced the likelihood of absenteeism in school by 52%, and reduced the likelihood of students engaging in a fight at school by 33%. 4. The Governor's Mentoring Initiative was created in 1999 to increase the number of mentors and tutors in Florida for children in our public schools by working closely with state and local mentor partner groups including Best Buddies, Big Brothers Big Sisters, Boys and Girls Clubs, Communities in School, HOSTS, the school volunteer coordinators, Take Stock in Children, the Florida Volunteer and Mentor Centers, and hundreds oflocal mentoring partners. 5. In support of mentoring, the Florida Cabinet approved an administrative rule which allows state employees one hour per week to serve as a mentor, which has resulted in thousands of new mentoring relationships. '-" ,..." 6. In support of mentoring, over 200 Florida businesses have joined the Governor's Mentoring Initiative corporate Honor Roll to allow employees an opportunity to mentor including such leading corporations in mentoring as Agilent Technologies, AIby's, Anheuser Busch, JM Family Enterprises, State Farm Insurance Companies and many more. 7. In support of mentoring, through the leadership of such organizations as the Florida League of Cities and the Institute ofGovemment, and with special assistance from the chair of the Municipal Mentoring Initiative, Mayor Rick Baker of St. Petersburg, many cities throughout the state are joining the mentoring movement and allowing employees the opportunity to mentor. 8. In support ofmentoring, a majority of the members in the House of Representatives have signed a petition stating that: "Mentoring is a low-cost program with great potential impact in the state. It might be Florida's most cost effective investment into the future." 9. St. Lucie County, the City ofFt. Pierce, St. Lucie County School District, Lawnwood Regional Medical Center, St. Lucie Medical Center, First People's Bank, State Farm Insurance Company, Department of Children & Families and the St. Lucie County Health Department have locally joined forces with Big Brothers Big Sisters to provide mentors to our local schools over the past year. 10. Indian River Community College, St. Lucie County School District, and QVC have locally joined forces with Take Stock in Children to provide mentors to our local schools over the past year. 11. Due to the focus on mentoring there has been a huge increase in the number of mentors and tutors in Florida and the Governor's Mentoring Initiative has documented over 72,000 one-on- one mentoring matches in Florida and an additional 42,000 group mentoring matches. 12. The establishment of Florida Mentor Month in conjunction with National Mentor Month · .... '-" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. /;,( DATE: January 15, 2002 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-01 - Revised Guidelines - Industrial Development Revenue Bonds BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: Permission to Advertise granted on December 18,2001. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board determine whether to adopt Resolution NO. 02-01 as drafted. [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 5-0 o glas Anderson ounty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attornl!Y: J.Jr Review and Approvals Managl!ml!nt & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Public Works Dir: County Eng.: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicabll!) Eft. 5/96 , '-' ""-tI , INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 01-2840 DATE: December 26, 2001 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-01 - Revised Guidelines - Industrial Development Revenue Bonds ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: At a recent meeting, the Board requested that County staff, along with the County's bond counsel and financial advisor, review the County's existing guidelines for issuing industrial development bonds (IDRBs) and recommend any suggested revision. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of draft Resolution No. 02-01 which incorporates a revised set of guidelines and procedures in blackline for issuance of IDRBs. Permission to advertise was granted on December 18, 2001, and notice of the public hearing was published on January 2,2002. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board determine whether to adopt Resolution No. 02-01 as drafted. DSM/ caf Attachment , '-' ....I RESOLUTION NO. 02-01 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A REVISED SET OF GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has made the following determinations: 1. Part II of Chapter 159, Florida Statutes (the IDRB Act, authorizes this Board to Issue Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (IDRB for projects to be used by private sector entities ( Projects) . 2. Section 159.29, Florida Statutes, directs this Board to determine whether a proposed Project complies with specified criteria and requirements. 3. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), imposes certain requirements which must be satisfied in connection with the issuance of IDRB . 4. On January 15, 1985, after publishing notice in the Fort Pierce News Tribune on December 20, 1984, and January 4, 1985, this Board held a public hearing on a proposal to establish guidelines and procedures for the issuance of IDRBs in St. Lucie County. 5. By Resolution 85-28, this Board approved "Guidelines and Procedures for the Issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds in St. Lucie County" (the "Guidelines"). 6. It is necessary and desirable in light of the responsibilities imposed by the IDRB Act and the complexity of the requirements imposed by the Code that the County provide explicitly for review of proposed Projects and IDRBs by bond counsel and financial advisor retained by the County in order to fully and adequately provide for protection of the interests of the County in connection with the issuance by the County of IDRBs and for the payment of fees associated with such review by the applicant for such financing. 7. The attached Guidelines contain revisions to Sections II.C. and III.C.1. intended to address such matters. [8. On. January , 2002, and Guidelines, as so revised.] _, 2002, after publishing notice in The Tribune on , 2002, this Board held a public hearing on the '-' ,..., NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The Guidelines and Procedures for the Issuance of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds in St. Lucie County, as revised and as attached to this resolution be, and they are hereby, adopted. B. hereof. This resolution and the Guidelines shall be effective on the date of adoption PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED, this _ day of ,2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA (SEAL) By: Chairman ATTEST: Clerk of the Circuit Court. ex officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney ~ ~ j '-" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM~. 5B DATE: January 15, 2002 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DEPT /' SUBJECT: River Branch Estates M.S.B.U. Second Public Heari g Potable Water Improvements - PSL Utilities BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: May 5,1998 - Board accepted the petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing. June 2, 1998 - Initial Public Hearing held. Board created MSBU and authorized County Engineer to proceed with project. March 14,2000 - Board approved the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Port St. Lucie December 18, 2001- Board granted permission to advertise the Second Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 02-023 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the River Branch Estates Municipal Services Benefit Unit; approved the attached preliminary assessment roll; and authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project. COMMISSION ACTION: lX] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] QTHER: 5-0 [x]County Attorney [x]Public Works Dir t~/ [x]Finance ~ fr Coordlnation/Sillnatures [x]Mgt & Budget 1/lf) lrlmfJr; [x ICo. Eng [ ]Purchasing []MSBU Coor:.:B? '-" ..., TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: COMMISSION REVIEW: January 15, 2002 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 02-004 Board of County Commissioners Donald B. West, County Engineer January 2, 2002 River Branch Estates MSBU Second Public Hearing Potable Water Improvements - PSL Utilities BACKGROUND The property owners of the River Branch Estates Subdivision petitioned St. Lucie County to establish a Municipal Service Benefit Unit (M.S.B.U.) to fund the costs necessary in bringing potable water improvements to their subdivision. The petition represented seventy three (73%) percent of the property owners in support of the project. The water system would be provided by Port St. Lucie Utilities. On November 29, 2001, the property owners were notified by mail of their tentative assessment and that an informational meeting would be held on December 13, 2001 to discuss the key issues of the project. The notification also stated that the County Engineer would proceed soon thereafter to the Second Public Hearing, recommending adoption of the assessment roll and to commence construction of the project. At the informal meeting, County staff and the Engineering Consultant for the project were on hand to discuss the construction layout and design of the water system, the method of assessment and tentative cost, and to address questions and comments. It was collectively agreed by the property owners present at the meeting, to proceed with the project. The method of assessment for this project is based upon the "Equivalent Residential Connection" (ERC) method, which means an equal charge per residential connection. The total assessment is $195,621.09 excluding interest. The Project would be financed for a period of fifteen (15) years, beginning November, 2002. In the event the Project is not ultimately approved and constructed, the cost of preparing the plans, specifications, bond validation proceedings, and cost estimates may be assessed against the affected property owners within the River Branch Estates MSBU. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 02-023 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the River Branch Estates Municipal Services Benefit Unit; approved the attached preliminary assessment roll; and authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project. cc: Staff Concurring Linda Smith, Tax Collector, Supr/Data Base Adm Evelyn Haskell, Property Appraiser, Director Tax Roll Preparation ~ ....., RESOLUTION NO. 02-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: DETERMINING THAT THE PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE RIVER BRANCH ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT TO FUND THE COST OF A PROJECT TO PROVIDE POTABLE WATER IMPROVEMENTS TO PROPERTIES WITHIN THE RIVER BRANCH ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT ARE JUST AND RIGHT; APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BASED ON THE EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION METHOD OF ASSESSMENT; LEVYING A NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ON THE REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE RIVER BRANCH ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT BASED ON THE APPROVED ROLL; AUTHORIZING COLLECTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BY THE UNIFORM METHOD OF COLLECTION; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, on June 2, 1998, based on the petition of seventy-three (73%) percent of the landowners pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances (the "Code"), the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County (the "Board") adopted Resolution No. 98-126 which created the River Branch Estates Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "River Branch Estates MSBU") to levy non-ad valorem special assessments based on the equivalent residential connection method of assessment to fund the cost of a project to provide potable water improvements to properties within the boundaries of the River Branch Estates MSBU in unincorporated St. Lucie County, Florida (the "Project"); and authorized the St. Lucie County Director of Engineering (the "County Engineer") to proceed with the Project pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 1- 13.5 of the Code; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 2002 pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code and Chapter 125 and Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes, the Board held a duly noticed and advertised second public hearing to consider propriety and advisability of the Project and to act as an equalizing board to consider the comments of affected land owners and other interested persons concerning the preliminary assessment roll forthe River Branch Estates MSBU, proof of publication of the public hearing is attached as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, after considering the comments of all interested persons, the Board has determined that the special assessments as set forth on the preliminary assessment roll for the River Branch Estates MSBU, attached hereto as Exhibit "B", are just and equitable. -1- '-' """ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: Section 1: The boundaries of the River Branch Estates MSBU which include the real property to be specially assessed to fund the cost of the Project are shown on the attached Exhibit "C". Section 2: The Project to be funded by a non-ad valorem special assessment levied by the River Branch Estates MSBU is to provide potable water improvements to properties within the River Branch Estates MSBU in unincorporated St. Lucie County, Florida. Section 3: The method of assessment for the potable water improvements shall be based on the equivalent residential connection method of assessment such that each property within the River Branch Estates MSBU shall share equally in the cost of the potable water improvements and that the amount of the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the properties derived from the improvements. Section 4: The preliminary assessment roll (Exhibit "B") for the River Branch Estates MSBU is hereby approved and confirmed and the assessment shall stand as a lien against the benefitted properties until satisfied. Section 5: A non-ad valorem special assessment (the "Special Assessment") in the total estimated amount of $356,527.43 which includes interest, to fund the Project as shown on the plans and specifications prepared by the County is hereby levied on the real property within the River Branch Estates MSBU (Exhibit "C") in the amounts set forth on the preliminary assessment roll attached as Exhibit "B". Section 6: The Special Assessment shall be collected by the uniform method of collection pursuant to Sections 197.3632 and 197.3635, Florida Statutes, as authorized by Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code beginning in November 2002 for a period of fifteen (15) years. Section 7: The County Engineer is authorized to continue with the Project. Section 8: Upon the completion of Project, the County Engineer shall report the actual cost to the Board, and the Board shall confirm a final assessment roll with such adjustments as may be necessary in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code. -2- '-'" """'" Section 9. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. After motion and second, the vote on this Resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward Vice Chairman Cliff Barnes Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula Lewis Commissioner John Bruhn PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 15th day of January, 2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney -3- '-" """ EXHIBIT "A" PROOF OF PUBLICATION ..J :)..J mO (/)0:: ::E!- (/)z WW !;(~ !-en (/)W wen ~~ z~ ~« m~ O::::E W- >..J _W 0::0:: a.. N o o N ~ ~ '" " c: '" .., i~~~æ~~~~~~~~~~~~æ~~æ~~~~~~~ œ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ !:Ë~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~- ~~~~~~~~~~~~------------ ~, ~æw~w~WWWW~M~WW**~~~~WWW "èi ~ 'E Ë ¡ ~ '¡.f~ ~ c: _ " !J 8 ~ .. '" ._ A- C ~ '" - c: " :§¡ ~ i! A- A- ~ c: of!. iii SIt:. ... ~ ¡JI:';: ... C ! o ... c: ~~ ~.S! NÕ (J - 1; ~ s .t!, ~I. {!. !! (J I~ A- " " .. :¡ 31 c:... ¡¡: c o " 1; · 2 II. ~ E c: ::i! o (J o ... z 0 o z 5! ~ '" A- " E '" z ~ " c: ~ o ~ ;;új ~.~~ ~ ~ ~ ;;;;;;;¡ rerereærerere~æ~~~ærerere~rerereærerererereærerere ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0) 0) 0) 0) ..... " ..... l"- N N N N coco coco ~~~~ tA- U'} tA- fß en en .... .... NN coco ~~ I/> I/> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN g~~~~m~g~~gg~~~g~~g~g~ M(,")('I')C")C")('I') ~ ~ Ll':! ~ Lr.! Ll':! '" '" '" Ll':! it:! Ll':! "''''''' Ll':! ~ lI1 &!&! CõCõ .... .... CÖCÖ I/> '" "'''' Ll':!U1 ~~~~~ ørÞcöcörJ:5 WWEßWtA- '" '" '" lI1l.l':! I.l':! MC")[')(") Lt11.l':! I.l':! I.l':! ;;o;CõCõ .......... .......... ~~~~ MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM(")MMMMMMMMM cocococococococo~cococococococococococococococococococococo ~ ~ ~ ~ d d ó c;j 0 ci d 0 ci ci 0 ci ci ci d 0 ci d d Ò 0 d ci ci d d ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lê 00 .... .... cid '" '" "'0 '" <D <Do '" '" 000000000 ..... .......... f""'- .......... ..... ..... ..... cidc:ioocicioci ~f;t~~f;t~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~ enen c: ........ .. N N EI= co a) ¡Ie ~ ~ .. 1/>1/> ~ 1: C"') C"') (") ('I') ~ C"') (W) i'm~~~ øøø~øøø~~~~~ø~~ :n:::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... ,... ,... t'-- ,.... ,... ...... t'-- f"-. ¡ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~ 0000000000000000000 ,.... ,......... f"-. ,....,.... ,.... ,.... ,...,. ,....,.... ,.... ,... ,... r-- ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... cicicioocidoociddddcidddd NC\lNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN an &n Ln Ln I.() &n I() I.() Ln I,() LO Ll) I,() LO Ll) at) It) LO LO ~~~~~~~~wwwwwwwww~w ***~*W~~*M~~~MM~~ø~ : íñ II. -- co (0 co <0 co co co co <0 co co co <0 a:::acocoa:::aa:::aa:::aa:::aa:::aa:::acocoooOJ ....: r--.: r--.:....: ....: r--.: ,....: ,....: ....:,....: ,....: ,....:,...: NNNNNNNNNNNNN z;;~~Z;Z;;Z;Z;w:;*Z;Z;;¡ :8 :8 :8 :8 :8 ¡s ¡s ¡s ,...: ,....: ,....: ,...:,...: r-.: ,....: ,...: ~~~~~~~~ th~~~thEß(ß-U) <0 to<OU)(C CD CD <0 <0 CClCCIGO<OCOCO<OCOCO ,....: ,....: ,....: ....: r--.: r--: r--: ,...: r--: NNNNNNNNN ;¡;~;ß;;;;;;;ß;;;;;;;; "''''''' co co co NNN en en en ~C"')_C"') t.DCD~ I/> '" '" LO If) It) I.() co co co 00 N N N N 0) en en 0) C"') M (") C"')~ cDcDcôCD fA fA fh fh If) If) If) I() It) If) OOOJOOOOClOOO NNNNNN 0) en en 0)0)(7) ~~~~~~ EßlßtflfhU)U) "'''' a) a) N N en en '" '" CÔCÔ I/> I/> '" '" '" coCOa) S!~~ C"!(")~ CO<ÖCO I/> '" I/> 13:£:£:£ ~s!~~ ~~~~ U)lßtflfh 1t)Ll)at)If)Ll)LO <000 coco.;o co NNNNNN 0)0>0)0)0>0) (")('1')(1')(")("),", ~~~~~~ ¡;; '-' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ri~~~M~~Mri~~MMriM~MMMMMMMMM~MMMM ..-..... ~ ~ ~~ ~.....".................... .......-...........................-............-............-................- NN N NNN NNNNN N NNN N NNN N "INN NN N NNN N ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .'! ..I;;; 81'-' NNNNNNNN mo:io:imma.imo:i ~,....~~,....~~'" IÔLÔLÕIÓLOLÔIl>LO EßtA-fhfhEßEßfhfh 0" (JI;;; ffil"-' "'''' coco ~sj ~~ '" '" NN mo:i .... .... ~ IÔLÔ '" '" N N a.io:i .... .... ~ ~ "'''' I/> I/> NNNNNNNNN cDcDcrio:ia:icDo:icrim ~~~~~~~~,... IÓIÔLÔLÕIÓIÔLÔLÕLÔ fl)fhfhfhEßfflfflfl)lß NNN ~~~ LÓ¡n1.() '" '" '" N N N ~~~ LÕ ¡n- Lri I/> I/> '" NNN ~ ~ 0) ~ 1ÔL()L() I/> '" I/> 'I"'"" T'" 'I"'"" 'I"'"" 'I"'"" 'I"'"" 'I"'"" "..... '1"'"""" "..... "..... .....,... ..... ,... .......... ,.... ,... 'I"'"" ..-,.... ..- ..- ..... ..... ..... .... ,.... E .J :5« o L1í :> w a: oil§! ~ :i Q « 0011 ~ oð=>Zs: «w:5...J ~~:i=>a:=> :EJ:0()~~ zQz::{zzS:S: «z~!!!wooz->- "'OJ:ü...Jt-ow ~X()"'o~~...J üCÜ::iIO:E1;: ~~ð~~~~~~~~ð~ððð~~~~~~ððoð~ð~ð g88gg~~~~~~~~88~~~~~~~ggg~~~~~ 1=8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~NN~~reåM~~~ ~gg88goooooooggg8gggg~googoggg§ -~~~~~ç~~~~~~~~~~~~~~""~,,,~ ' ~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~55558888õ888õ8 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ z ~ (') ..,() c.J«:E z>C« ;;;;ÜZI "'"'<CW~ Of-gjz ~~oðG s:c(Ooð ...Jz!ii« ¡¡j~¡S1;: ~~æ(§ w ~~ ()w ~::! :E~ ~ Ü :5 ~ ffi ~~ ~ i() ~ ~ ~Õz...Ju.i 0...J ¡¡¡ ~ ~;;:~ oðZ aI~ oil :E wa:~ º5~ 1'5(') a:LL oil Ü:E2 "'oz 011-. 0'" ..,=>Z«oð ...Ja:~ ~c.: ...w VI w::; w~a:~~:Ec üa: «wa:...Ja:«~~ ~~« :>~;~~~¡:o!!!~~z~~~::¡~ ~!iiOI.J o",!;(«:E052<(~¡:o z:E:"'¡¡j>", - -z&!VI.JIZti ~@~~i3~~~~~~§~S2:5~ V¡~~~~d!:!~~gj~~~~8? üc( ZZ ()W~~ g~;2;2 «::;011011 Uoð-l:i oða:O> :E"'~o «zza: ::; w 0'" ...Jal°ò ~~ffi~ :5gj~~ o:E-O 0521J5(òj - co '" .,.; co ": :;; ¿;; '" ... ,..; N '" ui '" '" '" o '" <ri re .; '" I/> ~ C"i co ... ui '" ¿;; '" en .,.; ... ... .; ¡;¡ I/> ~ ët co .... I/> ~ N CD '" en ¿;; ;:: .,.; '" co .; '" en o m o ... <D '" '" ¡n ... m :i: X w en '" re '" '" '" ¿;; o '" w ~ A- c:J Z ;¡: o ...J oJ o II. Z o Cf w ... o z '-" 'WfÌ l'! co I) >- Lõ ~ c: I) ..., I) c: ¢:: '" 0= 8 >- .a rn 'C '6 ë I) 'C :is '" 'S; x 0 '6 <.J .!!! <II ¡¡; .... '6 ~ .E :is I) ~ x £ ~ .!!! Õ .... 2 'C .E ~ .!!1 #. ã. -.' c: "" 0 :; rn c. .J '" '" ::::I.J E ã. 8 000 r¡) cñ cñ I) ...: (/)It: I) I) I) oS (/) :EI- .æ .æ .æ W .... It: (/)z c: c: c: I) W WW U) N 0 0 0 > I- .... U U t5 0 I-:E ~ ~ ~ :!!: <(/) ë >- Æ Æ Æ 0 . I-(/) z .a Õ Õ Õ ~ C III (/)W .... I) r¡) .!Ii Z . E 'C <.J <.J <.J W(/) z .!!1 I) < .... :I:(/) .... <II ~ ~ ~ .æ .J::. ¡¡¡ :E rn g 0 0 0 <.J .J 0< I) N N N :i: < :E U) rn rn '" rn c: >< z> U) :; 0 ~ II. .... ~ '" '" '" u .... i:!~ U) E ã. ã. ã. -$. i3 ~ - r¡) cñ cñ cñ cñ Æ z m:!!: 0 õ co ii2 - a> I) I) I) a> - 1t::E '2 .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ <.J 0 II. W- :J >< 2 u.. >.J 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> .!!! _W 'C c: c: c: c: c: ~ 0 It: It: c: '(3 '(3 '(3 '(3 '(3 .... II. co c: c: c: c: c: .E ¡¡; (/) '" co co co co co ~ ~ I- 'E c: c: c: c: c: 0 Z 0= "" 0= 0= "" N I) W 0 :5 <.J '" '" rn '" '" '" :E ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" ã. ã. ã. ã. ã. ã. c: .J co .J <II ~ ..... cñ cñ cñ cñ cñ cñ m a> I) a> I) I) a> a> <II .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ f (/) 1~ a> a> a> .~ a> a> co :!!: c. > > > .~ .~ ~ .J c. "" ~ ¡ ~ ~ ~ < < ~ L() ::::I ~ ¡¡; ¡¡; ¡¡; ¡¡; ~ a '2 '2 '2 '¡: .¡: .¡: .... a> a> W c. r¡) 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E > :!!: e ¡¡; 'C 'C 'C 'C 'C 'C 0 c... 0 co co co co co co 'C W a> E <.J Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü Ü N .J e a> .J .J .J .J .J .J 'E 00 - ~ (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) ~ 0 < 'C ~ rn rn rn rn rn rn E ~ a> '" '" '" '" '" '" co co c: ¡¡; ã. ã. ã. ã. ã. ã. c. ...: II. ë¡¡ '2 .... W cñ cñ !§ !§ !§ !§ a> c: :E 'E ¡¡; ¡¡; c. a> 00 0 rn rn rn rn E 'C 8 8 0 0 0 0 ë .J c: co <.J <.J <.J <.J rn .J a> rn 0 rn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E a> < ~ '" rn :I: ã. '5. '5. '5. '5. '" '" E r¡) c. c. '" (/) co co co (! r3 r3 a> co .... cñ a> <.J <.J <.J <.J '" ëij I- .E ¡¡; .æ õ õ õ õ õ õ '" ~ Z .S: 0 0> co W .... <.J c: E E E E E E (ij co :E a> '(3 c. c: ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" (ij (/) ~ c: '" rn '" '" rn '" c: (/) '5. co a> a> a> a> a> a> c: :ë W 0 r3 c: co ~ 0= oS oS oS oS oS oS '" <II (/) rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn (ij (ij (/) I) (ij (ij (ij (ij (ij (ij (ij (ij < c. '" '" e '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" <:r <:r ú.i <:r <:r <:r <:r <:r <:r <:r <:r UJ UJ c... UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ Ô ~ I- ~ ~ §: ~ §: §: E §: ê: ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ '''-"'' .."", RIVER BRANCH ESTATES MSBU IS AfE5E. I.H. 'J4.})-:;o. - æ96-OOOIlS, 2. 4T AC, i ;a NEWToo.. G. C. !~0~-:;Ol-oog5-OOO1i) 4.:ið AC. ii- DORAN. D. D. (312-0001-<)00/4) 9. 43 AC. .... rlns. I.'. In) (34a3·~l-o'06-QOO.1) 2." IoC.. .. Sf t\lC1l CD.NT'r (34Q3+5)l"'CU07-o::1Jfl) 1.66 I£. ~. W.TT5OPi. ILE. (~-:;Ol-I()ð-OOO/4) 5.61 AC. Q:JiIOI. ... ,- (~-3)l-oIOl-<XJC,/l) 2.03 IL. ~.1.1t. O.:IIAC. HAûl'1.C. (3403-502-<1110-000/1) 4.06 Af. g EXHIBIT "C" ~v- '-" ,.."" Agenda Request Item Number Date: s-c 01/15/02 Consent Regular Public Hearing leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] Quasi-JD [ X ] SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 02-028 granting a Con i' al Use Permit to lIow for the construction and operation of a 120 foot monopole telecommunications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural- 1 dulacre) Zoning District for property located at 8803 Indrio Roa To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: Verizon Wireless (MasTec Wireless, Agent), has requested a conditional use permit for land located at 8803 Indrio Road. The stated purpose for the conditional use is to allow for the construction and operation of a 120 foot monopole telecommunications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District, subject to Board of County Commissioners approval. (File No: CU-01-008) FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: At the December 20, 2001, public hearing on this matter, the 5t. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 8 to 0, with one member (Mr. Akins) absent, recommended approval for the requested conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-028. County Attorney Originating Depl: Finance: Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget Other: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER 5-0 Purchasing: Other: \..r """" Commission Review: January 15, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Assistant Community Development Director DATE: January 9,2002 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 02-028, which would grant the petition of Verizon Wireless (MasTec Wireless, Agent) for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 120 foot monopole communications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural 1 du/acre) Zoning District. LOCATION: 8803 Indrio Road. (Approximately ~ mile south/southeast of the intersection of Indrio Road and Emerson Avenue) ZONING DISTRICT: AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) FUTURE LAND USE: RS (Residential Suburban) PARCEL SIZE: 38.5 acres PROPOSED USE: 120 foot Monopole Telecommunications Tower. SURROUNDING ZONING: AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) to the north, south, east, and west. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is citrus groves and some residential. - The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is RS (Residential Suburban) to the south, east, and northeast. COM (Commercial) to the north and west.. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #7 (Ft. Pierce Boulevard), is located approximately 1 mile to the east. \.- 'WIÎ January 9, 2002 Page 2 Subject: Verizon Wireless File No.: CU-01-008 UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property will not require utility services. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT -OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for Indrio Road is 80 feet. The existing right-of-way width for Emerson Avenue is 36 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use is not in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.030(7), AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District, allows communications towers as conditional uses subject to Board of County Commission approval. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; ~ The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment granted a variance to allow a 200 foot communications tower within 750 feet of a habitable residential structure on August 22, 2001. The proposed tower is approximately 522 feet from a home, which is also the residence of the owner of the subject property. The proposed tower is located in a citrus grove. Surrounding properties are also used for agricultural production. 'w ""'" January 9, 2002 Page 3 Subject: Verizon Wireless File No.: CU-01-008 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. Access to the property is provided through Emerson Road via Indrio Road. Approximately 2 visits per month will be required for the maintenance of the tower and its associated equipment. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment.. The proposed site is located in an existing citrus grove and must comply with all local, state, and federal regulations concerning its development and operation COMMENTS The applicant, Verizon Wireless, has applied for the requested conditional use in order to construct a 120 foot monopole telecommunications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District. Communications towers are allowed as conditional uses in this zoning district subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. On August 22, 2001, the St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment granted a variance to allow the construction of a telecommunications tower within 750 feet of a habitable residential structure. The variance granted allowed the tower to be placed approximately 522 feet from this home, which is also where the owner of the subject property lives. The owner of that home has no objection to the construction of a telecommunications tower at this location. Subsequent to Verizon's original request for this tower, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has determined that the maximum height of the tower shall be 120 feet, not the originally requested 200 feet. Verizon has amended their application to reflect this new height limitation and has changed the type of tower to be built from a 200 foot lattice type tower to a 120 foot monopole structure. . The system Verizon is proposing is a digital system. The applicant has stated that this type of system allows for three times the number of calls when compared to analog cellular technology and can be delivered over the same channels. Verizon Wireless' Radio Frequency (RF) Engineer conducted an inventory of existing towers in St. Lucie County in order to try and co-locate on them, and thereby avoid having to construct a ~ ..., January 9, 2002 Page 4 Subject: Verizon Wireless File No.: CU-01-008 new tower. The RF Engineer has stated that the proposed tower location is the best location available to meet their coverage needs and that this location meets the requirements of the Land Development Code and also meets the requirements as mandated by their license with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Among the mandated conditions of their federal license are the following: 1. Must make PCS available to consumers by providing non-discriminatory coverage within the licensed region 2. Must provide PCS coverage to a certain percentage of their market area's population within a described timeline. 3. Cover most of its license area without discriminating between demographic groups. 4. Develop a mature system by the year 2002 as stated in the FCC licenses obtained by Verizon. Verizon has been in contact with representatives of AT&T, who are proposing to co- locate on the proposed Verizon tower. Co-location is encouraged in the Land Development Code and is preferred by tower companies to building new towers because of the cost savings involved with the construction of a new tower. At the December 19, 2001, meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 8 to 0, with one member (Mr. Akins) absent, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval for the conditional use permit. Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that the Board approve the petition for a conditional use permit to allow the construction and operation of a 120 foot monopole communications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural- 1 du/acre) Zoning District. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 02-028, which, if approved, would grant a conditional sue permit to allow the construction and operation of a 120 foot moríopolè communications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural- 1 du/acre) Zoning District. \..ø.- ..."I January 9, 2002 Page 5 Subject: Verizon Wireless File No.: CU-01-008 If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED: hf cc: Jason Laskey Jim Russakis Edward Becht, Esq. County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Planning Manager ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 '-' "'-' RESOLUTION 02-028 FILE NO.: CU-01-008 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 120 FOOT MONOPOLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE AG-1 (AGRICULTURAL -1 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Verizon Wireless (MasTec Wireless. A!;ent). presented a petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 120 foot monopole telecommunications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District for the property described below. 2. On December 20, 2001, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereinafter described request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 120 foot monopole telecommunications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural -1 du/acre) Zoning District for the property described below. 3. On January 15, 2002, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 5. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility ~ facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare.' 6. The proposed project will be serviced by adequate public facilities and services. File No,; CU-01-008 January 15. 2002 Resolution 02-028 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 "-' ., 7. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on January 15, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a Conditional Use Permit for Verizon Wireless to allow for the construction and operation of a 120 foot monopole telecommunications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District is granted for the property described as follows: THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 20 FEET AND THE WEST 48 FEET THEREOF. (Location: 8803 Indrio Road. Approximately 1/4 mile south/southeast of the intersection of Indrio Road and Emerson Avenue.) B. This Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire on January 15, 2003, unless a zoning compliance is obtained or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. C. The Conditional Use Permit approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Verizon Wireless, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary permits and authorizations from the appropriate Local, State, and Federal regulatory authorities prior to the issuance of any local building permits or authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part A. D. The Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use approval. Should the Conditional Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. ~ E. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be madé' on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. File No.: CU-01-008 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-028 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ~ After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner John D. Bruhn PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2002 ...., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H :IWPIRESOLUTIONIFIN ISHED.02\Verizon ,CUIVerizonRES.wpd File No,: CU-01-008 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-028 Page 3 ... .. ... .. ç Z :J ç 0 ü Z :J --- 0 C 1,1,0lIl ]NI' ]!)In'W Ü ..¡......oO 0: 0·- UJ (J)..¡......o i I > ã: . ---. CÖ z ... 00 -' ... ¡:: '-0 :! i 'I 0: 'I .. « 0....-1 I a~ GDNS 1,1'f0lll NOJ.'1i1'J :2: .. .. z « .... ... is ?; en en (J) (J) '- ..--... -+-' C Q) 0) « s - (j) (j) Q) Q) ~ C5: o N 0 ·C Q) (J)I- >~ ~ .......... ... .. ... .. S K 1 '-' ( (' ..,; -~ Z (j) o o I .,...- o A ~ý r~t7.,. j,#' '\O.ÞP':. ~, ~CI) '~a ~ ~ o 0 0 .. ~ · · · .a t æ 0 · x 0 5 Ì ~ ~ · 0 .. .. ~ · .. " ~ o t. \ t. \ ~ ... ~ 5 .. ... S '" 1 , ~ AlNn08 3380H833>10 \..i (' c. ..,., A Petition of Verizon Wireless (MasTec Wireless, Agent) for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a communications tower in the AG-1 (A ricultural) Zonin District. r.p.F.W.U.O. Canot No. CU 01-009 Indrio Road . " c '" . ~ ò z ã c g U ci ,,¡ ¡; ...: a: ...: Subject Parcel CJ ~ :;ø-4~ ~~_ QJ~ ~"'--= Map prepamd November 15, 2001 ::. ":.,......::.0::-'",: ~~--:: ==:::.t=. <rtf N ~~."IIIII~IoI'-_·lIgotfbrdillO~ f ~ ( ( ..,J Land Use Verizon Wireless (MasTec Wireless, Agent) H RU Indrio Road COM ~ , c '" ~ ~ c _ 0 g ~ o ~ u E '" ci ::i ,; ..: a: ..: MXD Airport F. P. F_ W. M. O. Conol Ne. 1 CU 01-009 Subject Parcel RS MXD Airport CJ ~ R ~.l ~4~.&i~ ~ G~j -=.ç>"~ ~ ¡ I\ Map prepared November 15, 2001 ~......twt..t~b'lII'**pWI'IIrIQ rid .....-~~ ......--r.-.ot_'-".......lO~..__ItIC__ ~,........,...nac~_.....~'*d'ICI~ \w-. c. (' ...." Verizon Wireless (MasTec Wireless, Agent) Zoning I ~ Indrio Road Subject CJ Parcel AG-1 ! c "' .. ~ ô z c ~ ~ 8 ~ ... AG 1 ci ::i .; ..: 0: ..: F.p.r.w.....D. Conol No.1 - CU 01-009 5trh~~~ i ~ ~- ~ Map prepared November 15, 2001 '*fNCI'*~~lDrg.tWlllflWr*1ll....__~....., ==::I:-:.::,:=~.no::...~=- N '-' ( ( "wi! Verizon Wireless (MasTec Wireless, Agent) CU 01-009 5{;r 4~ ~~ q¡.~ "7_~ Map prepared November 15, 2001 TN.~__~IDr.....~...,,,,--,......!ñ. N _-r-'b1___",..,.,..n_o.ÐWI.W_ --..........IIng~_...fIIl-.....DiNIIrIO-. '-" ...., AGENDA ITEM 4: Verizon Wireless (MasTcc Wireless. Al!ent) - File No. CU-OI-009 Hank Flores, presented Staff comments, stating that Agenda Item # 4 was the Application of Verizon Wireless (MasTec Wireless, Agent) for a Conditional Use Pennit to a1!ow a 200 foot lattice communications tower in the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District for property located at 8803 Indrio Road. Communications towers are a1!owed as conditional uses in the AG- 1 Zoning District subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. On August 22, 2001, the St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment granted a variance to allow the construction of the communications tower within 750 feet of a habitable residential structure. The variance granted a1!owed the tower to be placed approximately 522 feet from this home, which is also the home of the owner of the subject property, Verizon Wireless' Radio Frequency (RF) Engineer conducted an inventory of existing towers in St. Lucie County and has stated that the proposed tower location is the best possible location available that meets the requirements of the Land Development Code and also meets the requirements as mandated by their license with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to one condition: The proposed communications tower shall be constructed to a maximum height as detemñned by the FAA. Mr. Jerry Knight, representative for the petitioner, stated that they were requesting a Conditional Use Pennit in the AG-l (Agricultural - I du/acre) Zoning District because towers are only allowed as a conditional use. He continued that he had already obtained a variance to allow the tower less than 750 feet from residences. He also stated that they did examine other locations and that this was the best location possible. As indicated by Staff, they received word from the FAA, which would only allow a maximum height for the telecommunication tower is 120 feet. Therefore, they are requesting a reduced height of 120 feet as pemñtted by the FAA. Originally 200-foot lattice was going to be used. They are modifying their request and reducing the height to a 120-foot monopole. He continued, that in summary, they would be going from 200-foot lattice to a 120-foot monopole as requested by the FAA. Chairman Matthes asked if there were any questions of staff or the petitioner. Mr. Grande asked if this was a self-supporting pole or would it have guy wires. Mr. Knight answered that it would be a self-supporting monopole tower. Mr. Hearn asked about the tower at Indrio Road and 1-95. Mr. Knight stated that the 2nd sheet provided tonight depicts other towers in the area. Ms. Kristine Alexander stated that the FlIP (Florida Highway Patrol) tower that is located at the turnpike does not allow other antennas on it, due to the type of equipment. Me. Hearn asked if it was correct that they could not co-locate. Ms. Alexander advised that is correct. Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Ed Becht stated that the idea behind the variance to move the tower closer toward his client's residence and office was to minimize impact in the area. '" ....., Mr. Lounds asked if it would be possible to look at agricultural end if in a grove or a landscape waiver due to area. Mr. Kelly stated that a waiver to the landscape requirement of the County's Land Development Code could only be granted by the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Lounds questioned whether the tower was going into a functional grove. He also was concerned with any required landscaping issues impacting the grove and any waivers that may be granted. Mr. Becht stated that his client had already agreed to the required landscaping and would not be seeking an amendment from the Land Development Code requirement. Seeing no one else, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Jones stated that after considering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, including staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.07.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Verizon Wireless (MasTec Wireless, Agent), for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 120 foot lattice communications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 dulacre) Zoning District because it was a good use, it would not impact the surrounding area and additional tower and antennas are needed in the area. Motion seconded by Mr. Merritt. Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 8-0) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval. ( f '-" r f' Verizon RF Information RF Engineer Statement RF Propagation Maps FCC License Site Acquisition Affidavit ColocationILetter of Intent AT &T Letter of Interest ...., ~' '-r' . . , ...." ~. ~ Ver'70nwireles~ I I Verizon Wireless 777 Yarnato Road, Suite 600 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 I June 1,2001 I I Mr. Dennis J. Murphy, AICP Assistant Community Development Director St. Lucie County, Dept of Community Development 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 I I RE: Russakis Indrio Road - Verizon Site Number 68800 8801 Indrio Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34951 Mr. Murphy: I Verizon Wireless hereby certifies that the proposed installation on the existing tower will not cause interference with the use of properly functioning radios, televisions and/or telephone broadcasting and reception. I Additionally, a review of existing facilities, as identified by Verizon's site acquisition consultant Mastec Wireless Services for the aforementioned search area, will not meet Verizon's intended coverage requirements. I Based on this review, the proposed site location at Russakis Imlrio Road will provide the coverage and service objectives for Verizon Wireless in this area. Yours truly, I I I STATE OF FWRIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ¿;¿.5 J1<- day of ø~ ' 2001 by Joseph Webel, as Director, System Performance of Verizon Wireless Personal Communications unIted PartnershIp, a Delaware limited partnership, dba Verizon Wireless. He is personally known to me ef liaa "reèaeeá ~ ideatiliiGatiQR. I I ~ fficia Notary Signature) otary Public - State of Florida I (printedlfyped/Stamped Notary Name) JW Icmg "p..(>.Y Pl/e OFAClALNOTARYSEAL if~<:ç, JOSEPHINE CONOE '::\ . ~ COMMISS/QI NUMBER ~ ~ DD024()74 f" 0 o<f' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES F F~ MAy 8.2005 I I '" « . ...", .:-!\ta sTe c Affidavit Verizon Search Ring: #68800 Verizon Site Name: Russakis Indrio Road I, Christy Alexander, Site Acquisition Specialist, attest and affmn that based on an extensive review of the search area. as issued by Verizon Wireless, no existing tower, building or structure meeting Verizon's RF requirements was identified within the intended coverage area. Attached to this affidavit is a list and map of all feasible candidates evaluated and submitted to Verizon Wireless RF Engineers for review and consideration. q-IO-OI Date Notarized Statement: f?cr/dA COUNTY OF /J r ¿?...... 4- r- d! STATE OF The ~ing ~strument W. as acknowledged ..:::;-:; --...... ~~, 2001, Oby a,~ 4~4Je.,--:' before me this /0 H--- day of (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) c Å~A~~G~~~ NOTARY PUBLlC-STATE OF F"kr-¡'¿ My commission expires 11/;-fþJ G/e-/,/ /Î (PRINTED, TYPED OR STAMPED NAME 0 COMMISSION NUMBER: ¡ J' 7-1 ~ f ø GLENN M. BW..Y ... , Zm Ðcp. 11/1 ~S PU8UC · No. cq 8874&4 PanonoIIy _ II 0II0r 1.0. ~------. ~ '" LI:! -....I ... !<1¡>; '" a ~ ~, ..... ?r"IT1-I~Tt::W 191H PL SW F , 6 68800 PRO 251H ST SW ----- TripleM -+- a '" a ~ " UJ ~ >< a' '" a ~ " UJ ~ ><. 23RD ST SW ::¡ ¡!; 'i/ AMARIUS o 1998 Delorme. Street Atlas USA Mag 14,00 Mon Sep 1017:092001 Scale 1 :31 ,250 (at center) 2000 Feet 1000 Meters -- ~ '" ~ --S._ a '" '" " ~ '" ~ i" '" . '" ........... 'u "'".... N 23RO"'" ~ 23RD PL sw uni 24TI:!>~ .~W 23RD ST SW ~ -- ~ '" ~ 2JRD PL SW ~fJ) t) (/) ~'. ~ ~ ~ ~¡m~r~: 251H j!: ~ ~ . ¡!;,;¡~fTl;t s! sw .:-. ~'-dndricrcrosslngs-Shupp1rrg'C1r- - , ~. ~LLE~R 8 ~ BROOKUNE ~. ARBOLES DEL NOOTE ~~ Coqul~_A !2 :'í IPANEM~ WAY ~~ L1J 5 .~ . ffiz S/>NTAcLARA:'í ~ . .c;LTRUS PI>RK , '_ po \l'lPO-{';¡,-z. & ~ LÞKELMD 0' -.\\.\. . -".l. 0: Z ~ SALERNO RO !!! S2 ~ PENSACOt.A RO . ~ ðFORTWALTON ~ ':J pERU ::; . g¡: at!LTO 25TJ- STsW NORTH 'PENNŸLII' --+- -,~,- ~ ... E' ~o; ;to; .tc.~.. a 0: '" ~ '" '" :::J '" . COQUINA d' P,A:;;() Rot¡~ES. SANTA CLI>RA -'~- >C' LAK.IõL.""'!I? ,w,,<L. w; >' ...... fi' ~« ~ ã ffi~ ....1'·0 s;g 'T¡¡.... ~d'''f. ~ » ~ \?'i-~, 'rÞ . -., 'i-" r-' c¡¡, !!~~~~O ",¡.t>f "'lj . '15>.(> ~ 0 » .. ---~.--_._~ oo.~,.. ",,,, W' Wõ gz :i!:i! wUJ ",,,, ~ o rr: ..... .... « .... .!\!J,S~_R[) ~ '" 0: UJ ::; W ~. >- -' :::¡ OCALA DEER ,PARK a ",. '" ~ '" "" :::J '" o 0: .... .....: « .... u___.__.._____,,'_ ~ INDRI&RBIO RD : GROVERS RO ----->1 Wi ....' õi-- - -.Q IDfjIORI,1. ..... '" z ~ 713 a "'. >- '" ~- ~ Local Road - Mapr Connector - State Route - 'jnterstatellimited .Access o Point of Interest ~ Locale + Private Airport County Boundary Water Woodland Intermittent River ~ c ( ...., AGENDA - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20,2001 7:00 P.M. VERIZON WIRELESS (MasTec Wireless, Agent), has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the placement and construction of a 200-foot tall telecommunication:.. lattice tower and associated equipment in the AG-] (Agricultural- ] dulacre) Zoning District for the following described property: LocaJion: 8803 Indrio Road, Fort Pierce. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners December 10, 2001. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on December 8, 2001. File No. CU-01-009 ... , .... = N N '<t = <f) <f) ~ ~ <"'> <"'> a- <f) <f) <f) , , . -- ~ ~ 0 .... c.. 00 00 <f) 0'\ a- a- .... ..... '<t '<t '<t N <"'> <"'> - J~_! , ! ~Z' 'Ë ! ~ -< 00 ~ = ~ Q :l ~- C'<S ~ Ë :i .s (j = ~ -E-i .~ ~ -= tIS ª,6 ... ~ ~~ Q ~ ~ - C ~ ~~ = = ~ 0 e c.. .!::! o ~ ~> ~ ... Q.s pO'\ ..... <= = = = ~ e <= e 6 o u u ... 'õ.s .... .... = I~ Q,¡ ...;¡ Ii ,§ e- .; Q~ II ~il I ' :¡~;! : ¡ II.~IL~J~L Ii L ! ) ¡¡ ~¡ 0..) ,: q ~¡ ~ " ""'1" ¡¡ I!ö:!i£ ;, Pi! 1:' 1: ,'..... 1010 l'ris.¿jU"..j-~i :¡ I : ¡! ¡¡ ¡ ¡ :1 \i 'I jl , :¡ H i ii Ii "c:I "c:I " II~ ~ !1 rn v.I Ii -ã.5 'i ~'c ~ I ~ .., .., ~ .......... ... rn rn 'C ~ ~ 'C N N -< ~ ~ I .., i ~ e C'<S ~ I") ~ e C'<S z M ~I z .... ~ ~ <II U U e ~ ~ tIS ø.. ø.. Z ¡¡. ¡¡. ~\O\O r-- 00 00 tIS ci ~. 8 ~ ...,-.r -< = = IrJ øs ~&::; ~ ciciN ... N -< . - C'<S u I a- 00 I 00 00 00 o ~ ~ 0 =It: 00 Soo N - N - <"'> - ~ :!~'3 E-i ~~¡3 - M \0 o 0'\ , \0 '<t 0'\ '<t <"'> '<t <f) <f) <f) on on <f) <f) 0 ~ - - - - - a- - \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 '<t a- ~ - - - - - ..., N , , , , . , M - - - - ~ - <f) on <f) on <f) <f) 0 0'\ a- 0'\ '" '" a- M '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t ~ I ~¡.~,~p ~\-~ r-- -- , ,. '., ,0-1 i 0-1 ¡ -L_~j~i i ! : ¡ i I . : : 0-1 ¡....¡ ; ....¡ I ,...:¡ I' ....¡ I' ....¡ I I J~-~~~L~~~--~T~i __ I , i .., " ~:~ V' !U ii:>:,i:>: :1:,1: fOtO _~__~J_~.i Q) U V'U v;o. ~, ~¡ 2i~, ~' ~j ~ Vi c.J' oj U¡ V¡ Q) t ,i:>:Ii:>::i:>:Ii:>:ii:>:!i:>:: : 1:[ 1:: 1:', 1:, 1:'1 1:, : 0: 01 0 0' 0 01 -i E:<L~~I ¡¡. !_~+~ju , . " I Q'''c:I ~¡"::I' ¡ i I ~¡co¡: j ¡ i~i~1 i"c:li"c:l "c:Ii"c:l "c:I "c:Ii ,§;~, i~'~ ~ ~ ~~' 1'_10-1, ¡ 01 0 0 0 0 0 l'~l'~I: ¡]jl]]]]] t.r)o ______ 00 000000 C"'--1.I1! 000000000000 t~I~____'~_IOO.OO 00 00 00 II I I,' i, i ! i! I I ! t I ì i I I ++:_~_~I¡¡li i i [ I I ¡ I I I' I I I -5 ' " I ~ :.:: 51 W;':::;¡ ..... ~ ]00000 .~ 5 e 5 e e z¡.:;;:;¡,:;¡,:;¡,:; 1 t t a¡ ¡:: .9 .~ ta .5 ::E::E U') en fI) en fI) rn ~:';;¡:';;¡'- ~ ~ CI.)~~1tnV,¡ ~~~~~~ 00 r-- <f) ~ NO q'C! <f) M ~ =~-~~~~; - O\f'o\\O~ C--:N~N_~ -dON -vi - -'<t í I~~ ~~ ¡ ! !: ¡ t- ìnt~t t , o:g 18 8 8 ~ 8 0 10 8 8 8 § ~!) II § § § § ~ _I N ~ ~ - M- -NNN ('I"" M ("f') M ("f') ('r' I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~QO\O'<t<f) C"'i~:;~OO f"I1 ("f')....., N C't"Î - ~ \0 \0 <f) 88 00 OÕ 00 00 M N N'<t ..., M '<t'<t - ~ M M - - ,I ;i '...." !Ei¡~¡1 ,i_"~, iji~11 't= x: ¡ 01.£1: ~~t~1 i J Ii I;: I n I g! Ii ì~! ¡¡ '"Ei ,¡ ~I ""d: ¡I W:¡::¡I ~¡.....JI¡ \0 i ;¡ II '<t ~ ~ ~~ ø:¡a- o'<t tl..~ N -5 :g ..... ~ -a ::E i ~ ; ~ ~ 5 ø:¡o ... " ~ ~ ~>- ..., <f) ~;g 00 <f) ~r--: ~ N 00 - r-- r-ir-: r-- ~ I Î I I ~I a- 00 00 88 ~ 0 88 00 ~ M ~ - '<t <"'> <f)'<t ~ ..., "" ~ ~ cr ...." '-' Sf LUC( INTY PLANNING AND . ZQ .G COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AGfNDA December 20, 2001 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, NOTICE ¡~ hereby given ift accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the 51. Lucie County land Òe....eJopment Code and the P(OvÎ~jons 0. f the St. lUci.e County comprehen.Sive. Plan, the fOllowing opplÎConh have requested that fhe St Lucie County Plonnll1g and Zoning Commis5ion cooslder ~ their fo1!owing request I. crv CANA, L TO tor Q Change in Zoning from Ihe IH {Indushiat Heavyl, Ulld U (Utilitì!:s)Zol)ing District. to IIle U (lItilities)Zoninq District f()r the ~ollowil1g described property; Parcel! COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF Sf:CTlON I, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE JB EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FlORIDA, THENCE RUNS SOO'00'54"W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION I, A DISTANCE OF 2897.98 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, !HENCE RUN SOO"00'S4"W, ALONG THE EAST LINE I OF SECTION I. A DISTANCE Of 362.83 FEET; THENC.E.j' RUN N89'S9'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 660 FEET; THENCE RUN SOO'OO'54"W, A DISTANCE OF 330,00 FEET; THENCE RUN N69"S9'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 1976.36 FEET; THENCE RUN N44'46'00"E, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF A flORIDA POWER AND LIGHT ~ASf- MENT, A DISTANCE OF 1869]6 fEET; THENCE RIJI:.t SOooOO'54"W, A DISTANCE OF 63503 FEET; THEN&, RUN S. 89."..S9'06"E' A .DISTA. NCE Of 132D-Q0 FEET Tº ...j' THE POINT OF BEGINNING; All LYING AND8EI~ IN SECTION I, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH. RANGE 3á, EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FlORIDA, AND CONTAIN, ING 36.06 ACR~S MORE OR lESS. ,. Parcel 2: . . 1, I' A PARCEL Of lAND IN SECTION 1. TOWNSHIP, 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, STc LUCIE COUNTY, FlORI- ¡ DA, SAID PARCEl IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, ' COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST OCRNER OF SECTION 1. THENCE RUN SOO'oo'54W, ALONG THE EAST LINE Of SECTION I, A DISTANCE OF 2B97"~8 FEET, THENCE RUN N89°S9'06"W,A DISTANCE OF 1320.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NOO'OQ'54"E, A DISTANCE OF 635.03 FEfT. TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY 'LINE OF THE 660 FOOT WIDE flORIDA PQWER AND LIGHT COM- PANY EASEMENT, AS DESCRI8ED IN . OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 333. A I. PAGE 241!. OF'THÉ PUBliC RECORDS OF ST. lUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. AND THE POINT· OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOO·00'54~E.ADISTANCE OF 937-46 FEET, TO THE NO~THWESTERl Y LINE OF SAID EASEMENT, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST, ERLY liNE OF THE 150 FOOT WIDE flORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD RIGHT-OF~WAY; ,THEN RUN S44'46'OO"W, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY lINE,A DISTANCE OF 653.38 FEET, THENCE RUN SOO'OO'54"W, A DISTANCE Of 653,38 FEEI; THENC~ RUN S44°46·00"W. A DISTANCE OF 1216.39 F~ET; THENCE RUN $00·00·54"W, A .OISTANtE OF 284.08 FEEJ,'TO THE SAID SOUTHEAS,TERl Y LINE OF THE 660 FOOT·WID. FlORIDAPOW~R.AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENC~ RUN N44'~6'OO"W, ALONG SAID SÖÜTHEASTERLY liNE. A DISTANCE' OF lB69]8 FEET. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE '~Bö~E'ö~SCR(' '''~Ràt:CONTA~5.4846 ~7~~s;!~?~r_ O~lES' Pb~ê-"i:C_-.:~· ./~;'~.:'-._'."- _, ....:.:',;:_:.,. .. .' ^ A p..,R!:El;'bf'!tAND IN SECTl9N I, rOWNSHIf; 37 sqUTt!..RANG(38 EAST..ST:-WCIE COU\,TY. FlORI- ,?A.:SAIDPARŒlIS DESCRIBEq ÀS Fe>~LOWS, COMMEN({ AT THE NE CORNER OF' SECTION I, fÒWNSHIP37 SOUTH; RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY; flORIDA,· THENCE RUN. SOO.OO'54"W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION I. A DIS, TANCE OF 2567.98 FEET, TO A POINT OF BEGIN- NING THENCE CONTINUE SOO"OO'54"W ALONG THE I EAST 'LINE OF SAID SECTION I. A DISTANCE Of' 330.00 FEET, THENCE RUN N69°59'06~W ^ DISTANCe OF 1320 FEET, THENCE RUN NOOOOO'54"c A DISTANCE Of 330.00 FEET, THENCE S89'>59'06"E A. DISTANCE OF ~ 320 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING AND BEING IN SECTION I, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND CONTAINING 10.00 ACRES MORE OR LESS. Location, West side of Range Line Rood, oPPfO,I!;imotely 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off RO?d. 2_ CPV CANA, L TD_ for (] Conditional Use Permit to ollow the construction of an electric power generation plant in tha U (Utilities) Zoning District for the following described property, I Location: West side of Range tine Read, appro;w;imately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road 3. Verizon Wireless a Conditional Use Permit to allow the placement and construction of a 200 foot toll telecommuni- cations lattice tower and associated equipment in the AG-I (I\griculturol - 1 du/aae)Zoning District' for the following described >IOperfy, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST, lUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. lESS AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 20 FEET AND THE WEST 48 FEET THEREOf, Location: 8a03lndrio. Rood, Fort Pierce. PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in Comr:nissiort Chambers, Roger Poitras' Annex.- 2300 Virginia Avenue. F'?rt Pierce, Florida on December 20, 2001, beginning Of 7:00 P.M.!:>r os SOOn thereafter. as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Stqtutes, jf 0 per- son decides to appeal' any decision made by a board, agency.-or commission with respect to any ·matter consid- ered at a meeting or hearing, he will need 0 record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he !,"ay need to ensure. thot a verbatim record of the' proceedings is mode, ~¡ch~· in~udes. .the testimony and evidence upon whõch the bppøaHs to be based. PLANNING -\~ND -ZONING COMMISSION' ST. lUCIE COUNTY, flORIDA /5/ Stefan Matth.s. CHAIRMAN pubn.., December 8. 200 1 2301135 rhè Tribune, Saturday, Dé~mb~'å, 20011 '-' (' ( '...I Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 12/20/01 File Number CU-01-008 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Manager ~ DATE: December 14, 2001 SUBJECT: Application of Verizon Wireless (MasTec Wireless, Agent) for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 200 foot lattice communications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural 1 du/acre) Zoning District. LOCATION: 88031ndrio Road ZONING DISTRICT: AG-1 (Agricultural- 1 du/acre) FUTURE LAND USE: RU (Residential Urban) PARCEL SIZE: 38.5 acres PROPOSED USE: 200 foot Lattice Communications Tower. SURROUNDING ZONING: AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) to the north, south, east, and west. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is citrus groves and some residential. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is RS (Residential Suburban)., FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #7 (Ft. Pierce Boulevard), is located approximately 1 mile to the east. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property will not require utility services. ~' ....... c ( ~ December 14,2001 Page 2 Subject: Verizon Wireless File No.: CU-O 1-009/BA-01-004 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for Indrio Road is 80 feet. The existing right-of-way width for Emerson Avenue is 36 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use is not in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.030(7), AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District, allows communications towers as conditional uses subject to Board of County Commission approval. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment granted a variance to allow a 200 foot communications tower within 750 feet of a habitable residential structure on August 22, 2001. The proposed tower is approximately 522 feet from a home, which is also the residence of the owner of the subject property. The proposed tower is located in a citrus grove. Surrounding properties are also used for agricultural production. ':" '--' r (' ""'" December 14,2001 Page 3 Subject: Verizon Wireless File No.: CU-01-009/BA-01-004 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. Access to the property is provided through Emerson Road via Indrio Road. Approximately 2 visits per month will be required for the maintenance of the tower and its associated equipment. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment.. The proposed site is located in an existing citrus grove and must comply with all local, state, and federal regulations concerning its development and operation COMMENTS The applicant, Verizon Wireless, has applied for the requested conditional use in order to construct a 200 foot communications tower in the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District. Communications towers are allowed as conditional uses in this zoning district subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. On August 22, 2001, the St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment granted a variance to allow the construction of the communications tower within 750 feet of a habitable residential structure. The variance granted allowed the tower to be placed approximately 522 feet from this home, which is also where the owner of the subject property lives. He has no objection to the construction of the communications tower. The system Verizon is proposing is a digital system. The applicant has stated that this type of system allows for three times the number of calls when compared to analog cellular technology and can be delivered over the same channels. Verizon Wireless' Radio Frequency (RF) Engineer conducted an inventory of existing towers in St. Lucie County in order to try and co-locate on them, and thereby avoid having to construct a new tower. The RF Engineer has stated that the proposed tower location is the best location available that meets the requirements of the Land .... '-' ( ( ...." December 14, 2001 Page 4 Subject: Verizon Wireless File No.: CU-01-009/BA-01-004 Development Code and also meets the requirements as mandated by their license with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Among the mandated conditions of their federal license are the following: 1. Must make PCS available to consumers by providing non-discriminatory coverage within the licensed region 2. Must provide PCS coverage to a certain percentage of their market area's population within a described timeline. 3. Cover most of its license area without discriminating between demographic groups. 4. Develop a mature system by the year 2002 as stated in the FCC licenses obtained by Verizon. Verizon has been in contact with representatives of AT&T, who are proposing to co-locate on the proposed Verizon tower. Co-location is encouraged in the Land Development Code and is preferred by tower companies to building new towers because of the cost savings involved with the construction of a new tower. The applicant has provided a propagation map indicating the coverage of the area under current conditions and a propagation map indicating what the coverage would be expected to be with the addition of the proposed tower. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: County Administrator County Attorney Jason Laskey File ~ ( f ..., Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested conditional use. MOTION TO APPRQVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF CQMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE APPLICATION OF VERIZON WIRELESS (MASTEC WIRELESS, AGENT), FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A 200 FOOT LATTICE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE AG-1 (AGRICULTURAL - 1 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE... [LIST CONDITION(S)] MOTION TO DENY: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF VERIZON WIRELESS (MASTEC WIRELESS, AGENT), FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A 200 FOOT LATTICE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE AG-1 (AGRICULTURAL - 1 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE... [CITE REASON(S) WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC] To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: '-' ..., Agenda Request 5b Item Number Date: Jan 15, 2002 Consent Regular Public Presentation Leg. [ ] [ [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] Board of County Commissioners Community Development Silver Lakes f Preliminary Planned Unit Development At the December 4, 2001, County Commission Meeting, the Board continued the Public Hearing/Discussion on the review of the proposed Planned Unit Development known as Silver Lakes until January 15, 2002 at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of this continuation was to provide the developer and County staff an opportunity to address certain questions that had arisen between the presentation of this project to the County Planning and Zoning Commission and the scheduled County Commission meeting. Over the past several week periods, County Staff has met with the developer and his agents to review the issues of concem. Staff has been advised that the site plans for this project will be amended to reflect several changes that will address the concems raised regarding open space, development product type within the project and overall site design. However, as of this date, we have not been provided any specific design proposals to review or comment on. On January 9, 2002, County Staff received the attached request to continue this hearing once again. Given that there are likely to be substantial changes to the proposed site plans, staff cannot support a further continuation at this time. Staff recommends that the Board decline to proceed with the requested extension and determine that the project be sent back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further review, COMMISSION ACTION: D APPROVED 0 DENIED [J[] OTHER No vote or action taken. To be processed throuqh Planninq and Zoninq. County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND609a) COMMISSION ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER , To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: '-' ~ Agenda Request 5b Item Number Date: Jan 15, 2002 Consent Regular Public Presentation Leg. [ [ [ ] [ X I Quasi-JD [ X ] Board of County Commissioners Community Development Silver Lakes / Preliminary Planned Unit Development At the December 4, 2001, County Commission Meeting, the Board continued the Public Heañng/Discussion on the review of the proposed Planned Unit Development known as Silver Lakes until January 15, 2002 at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of this continuation was to provide the developer and County staff an opportunity to address certain questions that had arisen between the presentation of this project to the County Planning and Zoning Commission and the scheduled County Commission meeting. Over the past several week periods, County Staff has met with the developer and his agents to review the issues 01 concern. Staff has been advised that the site plans for this project will be amended to reflect several changes that will address the concerns raised regarding open space, development product type within the project and overall site design. However, as of this date, we have not been provided any specific design proposals to review or comment on. On January 9, 2002, County Staff received the attached request to continue this hearing once again. Given that there are likely to be substantial changes to the proposed site plans, staff cannot support a further continuation at this time. Staff recommends that the Board decline to proceed with the requested extension and determine that the project be sent back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further review. CONCURRENGE:. Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Coordination/ Signatures Mgl. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND609a) " , '-" ...., Commission Review: January 15, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Administration MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Asst. Community Development Director DATE: January 9, 2002 SUBJECT: Silver Lakes / Preliminary Planned Unit Development At the December 4, 2001, County Commission Meeting, the Board continued the Public Hearing/Discussion on the review of the proposed Planned Unit Development known as Silver Lakes until January 15, 2002 at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of this continuation was to provide the developer and County staff an opportunity to address certain questions that had arisen between the presentation of this project to the County Planning and Zoning Commission and the scheduled County Commission meeting. Over the past several week periods, County Staff has met with the developer and his agents to review the issues of concern. Staff has been advised that the site plans for this project will be amended to reflect several changes that will address the concerns raised regarding open space, development product type within the project and overall site design. However, as of this date, we have not been provided any specific design proposals to review or comment on. On January 9, 2002, County Staff received the attached request to continue this hearing once again. Given that there are likely to be substantial changes to the proposed site plans, staff cannot support a further continuation at this time. Staff would recommend that the Board decline to proceed with the requested extension and determine that the project be sent back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further review. If you have any questions, please let me know. Submitted: Dennis J. urphy, AICP mmunity Development Director DJM/ SILVERLAKE1 (H) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager Lindsey Walter Dennis Mele, Esq. · JAN, 8. 2002 9: 15PM KJLDAY & ASSOC1ATES NO. 303 P. 2/2 ...I Kilday & Associates Landscape ArchitectS / Planners 1551 Forum Place, Suite 10M WeS1 Palm BIBch. Florida 33401 1561} 689-5522' Fax (561) 689-2592 www.kildayinc.com January 9, 2002 Mr. Dennis Murphy, Acting Director St. Lucie County Department of Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce. FL 34982-5652 Re: Silver Lake PUD Dear Mr. Murphy: Please accept this letter as a request to postpone the Silver Lake PUD Petition scheduled on the January 15,2002 Board of County Commissioner Public Hearing agenda. The purpose of this request is to allow the applicant time to meet with County staff to discuss issues relative to the development layout. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, Cc: Steve Glassman Noreen S. Dreyer, Esquire Dennis Mele, Esquire Butch Terpening. P.E. Bob Weigt H:diønl&lSOO.15murphy_'..()lH)2..doc ~ '-' ...." Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5~E Jan 15, 2002 Consent Regular Public Presentation Leg. [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X I SUBJECT: Palm Breezes Club! Preliminary Planned Unit Development To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: At the December 4, 2001, County Commission Meeting, the Board continued the Public Hearing/Discussion on the review 01 the proposed Planned Unit Development known as Palm Breezes Club. The purpose 01 this continuation was to provide the developer and County stall an opportunity to address the Questions raised by the Board with regard to certain developer contributions towards improvements to Orange Avenue. On December 11, 2001, County Stall met with the developer and his agents to review what options existed, At that meeting, a consensus outline 01 how to proceed with this project was agreed to, however, the details of this outline were completed in time to present it to the Board at the scheduled County Commission meeting 01 December 18, 2001. At that meeting both County Staff and the developer requested that the Board once again continue this matter until the January 15, 2002 at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. County staff and the developers of this project have met to discuss what options exist in regard to the improvement 01 Orange Avenue from just east of the Florida Turnpike, to the intersection with Kings Highway. In our discussions, we have determined that because of the condition of the roadway In this area, we are in a position to justify the use of road impact lees as a possible source of lunding to linance the capacity enhancement actions that would take place through the widening 01 the existing roadway, The estimated cost of providing lor the widening of this roadway segment, as previously outlined with Board, is approximately 1 million dollars. This estimate includes design and construction but does not contemplate the acquisition of any additional right-ol-way through this area. FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Stall recommends that the Board approve Resolution 02-025, granting preliminary planned development plan approval lor the project known as Palm Breezes Club Planned· Unit Development. County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: i~ Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: 5LJ D COMMISSION ACTION: APPROVED D DENIED OTHER 5-0 Purchasing: Other: (AGEND608a) J. , '-' ...., Commission Review: January 15, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Administration MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Asst. Community Development Director DATE: January 9, 2002 SUBJECT: Silver Lakes / Preliminary Planned Unit Development At the December 4, 2001, County Commission Meeting, the Board continued the Public Hearing/Discussion on the review of the proposed Planned Unit Development known as Silver Lakes until January 15, 2002 at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of this continuation was to provide the developer and County staff an opportunity to address certain questions that had arisen between the presentation of this project to the County Planning and Zoning Commission and the scheduled County Commission meeting. Over the past several week periods, County Staff has met with the developer and his agents to review the issues of concern. Staff has been advised that the site plans for this project will be amended to reflect several changes that will address the concerns raised regarding open space, development product type within the project and overall site design. However, as of this date, we have not been provided any specific design proposals to review or comment on. On January 9, 2002, County Staff received the attached request to continue this hearing once again. Given that there are likely to be substantial changes to the proposed site plans, staff cannot support a further continuation at this time. Staff would recommend that the Board decline to proceed with the requested extension and determine that the project be sent back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further review. If you have any questions, please let me know. Submitted: " Dennis J. urphy, AICP Asst. mmunity Development Director DJMI SlLVERLAKE1 (H) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager Lindsey Walter Dennis Mele, Esq. JAN, 8, 2002 9: 15PM KILDAY & ASSOCIATES NO. 303 P. 2/2 .."" , Kilday & Assocjate3 Landscape ArchitectS f Planners 1551 Forum Piece, Suite 100A West Palm Beach. Florida 33401 (5611 689-5522' Fax (561) 689-2592 www.kildevinc.com January 9. 2002 Mr. Dennis Murphy, Acting Director St. Lucie County Department of Community Development Planning DivisiOn 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Re: Silver Lake PUD Dear Mr. Murphy: Please accept this letter as a request to postpone the Silver Lake PUD Petition scheduled on the January 15. 2002 Board of County Commissioner Public Hearing agenda. The purpose of this request is to allow the applicant time to meet with COunty staff to discuss issues relative to the development layout. Please feel free to 0011 me If you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely. Cc: Steve Glassman Noreen S. Dreyer, Esquire Dennis Mele, Esquire Butch Terpening. P.E. Bob Weigt H·dientsl500.15murpny_1~doo .- ,- V'" To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: \.r' ..."" Agenda Request 5'f Item Number Date: Jan. 15,2002 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ) [ ] [ X] [ ] Quasi-JD [ Board of County Commissioners Interim Community Development Dir /JJ/ Consider Draft Resolution 02-024 approving the reque Community Sanna Club, Joint Venture for a Major Adjustment to an existing Planned Unit Development for the project known as Savanna Club. (File No.: SPMJ-01-005) On April 27, 1982, this Board approved a petition for a Development of Regional Impact for a 2,394 unit adult manufactured community to be known as Savanna Club. The net density for this project was 5.58 du/acre, with a gross density of 3.06 dulacre. On July 1, 1984, this Board approved a designation of Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Savanna Club project. On December 3, 1985, this Board approved a petition for a Major Adjustment to the PUD, which reduced the total number of units for the Savanna Club, DRI from 2,394 manufactured home lots to 2,350 manufactured home lots. This reduced the net density of the project from 5.58 dulacre to 5.48 dulacre and the gross density from 3.06 dulacre to 3.00 dulacre. At this time, Community Savanna Club, Joint Venture, is applying for a Major Adjustment to the approved Planned Unit Development for the development of Phase V of the Savanna Club DRI and for the construction of an 11,849 square foot clubhouse, of which 9,000 square feet will be designated as a hurricane shelter. The subject property is located on a 60.42-acre parcel of land within the Savanna Club DRI, at the northwest comer of Bromeliad Circle and Savanna Club Boulevard, just north of Savanna Club Phase IV. Phase V of the Savanna Club DRI, originally was shown to have 229 manufactured home lots. The applicant is proposing 228 manufactured home lots. The applicant's request is consistent with the permitted density of the Savanna Club DR!. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 02- 024, which, if approved, would grant this request for Major Adjustment to an existing Planned Unit Development, subject to the conditions contained therein. NIA N/A Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-024, subject to the conditions contained therein. . ~ COMMISSION ACTIOÒ W APPROVED DENIED D OTHER 5-0 -- Douglas M, Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: '-' .." Commission Review: January 15, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Administration MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Asst. Community Development Director DATE: January 8, 2002 SUBJECT: Palm Breezes Club/ Preliminary Planned Unit Development At the December 4, 2001, County Commission Meeting, the Board continued the Public Hearing/Discussion on the review of the proposed Planned Unit Development known as Palm Breezes Club. The purpose of this continuation was to provide the developer and County staff an opportunity to address the questions raised by the Board with regard to certain developer contributions towards improvements to Orange Avenue. On December 11, 2001, County Staff met with the developer and his agents to review what options existed. At that meeting, a consensus outline of how to proceed with this project was agreed to, however, the details of this outline were completed in time to present it to the Board at the scheduled County Commission meeting of December 18, 2001. At that meeting both County Staff and the developer requested that the Board once again continue this matter until the January 15, 2002 at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. County staff and the developers of this project have met to discuss what options exist in regard to the improvement of Orange Avenue from just east of the Florida Turnpike, to the intersection with Kings Highway. In our discussions, we have determined that because of the condition of the roadway in this area, we are in a position to justify the use of road impact fees as a possible source of funding to finance the capacity enhancement actions that would take place through the widening of the existing roadway. The estimated cost of providing for the widening of this roadway segment, as previously outlined with Board, is approximately 1 million dollars. This estimate includes design and construction but does not contemplate the acquisition of any additional right-of-way through this area. Because the request before the Board is for Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval only, and given the fact that this project must be re-presented to the Board for Final Plann~d Unit Development approval prior to the issuance of any development avthorization' for construction permits, staff at this time recommends that the Board proceed with thé Preliminary Planned Unit Development Public Hearings on this petition and that the Board examine the cited special conditions found in Resolution 02-025. '-' ....I January 8, 2001 Page 2 Subject: Palm Breezes Club/ Preliminary Planned Unit Development Specifically, new Condition Number 5, as contained in this Resolution outlines a method by which the financing for the improvement of this portion of Orange Avenue can be considered. In brief, what this condition contemplates is that the developers of this project would agree to finance the amount of the improvements to range avenue up to what they would be paying in road impact fees over the life cycle of the project. Based on our current Road Impact Fee schedules, the amount due from this project will be approximately 1.3 million dollars. Staff recommends that the Board approve Resolution 02-025, granting preliminary planned development plan approval for the project known as Palm Breezes Club Planned Unit Development. With this approval the developers of the project and the County would then be in a position to work out the final details associated with financing the necessary safety and capacity improvements to Orange Avenue. If you have any questions, please let me know. Submitted: DJM/ PALMBREEZE4(H) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager Dan Harrell, Esq, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '-" .....I RESOLUTION 02-025 FILE NO: RZ-01-016 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS PALM BREEZES CLUB - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida,based on the testimony and evidence presented, including, but not limited to the staff report, has madethe following determinations: CHANGE IN ZONING 1. Roger Medema,. presented a petition for a change inzöningfrom the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) tothe PUD (Planned Unit Development"Palm BrèezesClub) Zoning District for certain property in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. On November 25,2001, the St. Lucie County Plannimgand Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due notice waspublishedandmailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior tothe hearing, and recommended to this Board that the requested changeinzoning frOm the PUD(Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-l(AgricultLlri;\I.Resigential- 1 du/acre) to the PUD (Planned Unit Development -Palm Breeze§'Club)cZoning District be granted. 3. On December 4, 20Ø;~¡,t~is:leoard hèlda public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearirtg,faíi\âlmptifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subjectprop~rty and nal approval to the property described below. That meeting wasc()ntinued U ember 18, 2001. 4. Finafaction on the request for change in zoning is to be withheld until application for Final Planned UnitDèvèlopment has been filed for review. SITE PLAN 5. The petitioner is proposing the construction of a residential project c01ls1sting of 646 Units in two residential phases and a 3.5 acre commercial parcel in Phase III for property located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet west of the Florida Turnpike. File No.: RZ-01-016 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-025 Page 1 '-' .....I 1 6. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed 2 project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements. 3 4 7. On November 25, 2001 , the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held 5 a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property 6 owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended to this 7 Board that Preliminary Development Plan approval forthe project to be known as Palm 8 Breezes Club - PUD, be granted. 9 10 8. On December 4,2001, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing 11 a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail allowners of property within 500 feet of 12 the subject property, and granted Preliminary Development Site Plan approvalJorthe 13 property describe below, and prior to the closing of this public hearing, continued any 14 further review of this petition until December 18,2001. 15 16 9. On December 18, 2001, this board reconvenedthepubHchearing on this petition ad 17 gain continued any further review on this matter until January 15, 2002. 18 19 10, On January 15., 2002 this board recoQvenedthEtpublic hêa.rihg on this matter and 20 accepted additional public comments and testimony.. 21 22 11. The proposed project is consistent with Ute generålpurpose, goals, objectives, and 23 standards of the St. Lucie Cot,mty Land Developrnent Code, the St. Lucie County 24 Comprehensive Plan, and the Gode..(.')fOrdinances of St. Lucie County. 25 26 12. The proposed project will not have an¡.ll'1dueªdverse effect on adjacent property, the 27 character of the neighborhood, traffiø)tøndltions, parking, utility facilities, or other 28 matters affecting the public health,säfety, and general welfare. 29 30 13. All reasonable steps håvebeen.taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed 31 project ontheirnmediatevicinitythrough building design, site design, landscaping, and 32 screening. . 33 34 14. The proposed projectwillbe constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere 35 with the developméntáhduse of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable 36 district regulations. 37 38 15. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and servic.es. 39 40 " 41 42 NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. 43 Lucie County, Florida: 44 File No.: RZ-01-016 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-025 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 \."..< ""'" A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Preliminary Site Plan for the project to be known as Palm Breezes Club - A Planned Unit Development be, and the same is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Culpepper & Terpening., dated May 30,2001, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Director on May 31 , 2001 , forthe property described below, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project, except those associated with any model or sales center, the developer of Palm Breezes Club shall construct at the project entrance a westbound right turn lane from Orange Avenue into the project entry road. 2. Prior to any final development plan approvals for any portions of the area indicated as Phase II of the project, the developer shall be required to: a. Construct, to County standards and requirements, a dedicated, southbound, left turn laneþR North Rock Road at the intersection with Orange Avenue; or, b. Submit to the County, sufficienlsecurjty,in an amount to be determined by theCounty,toprovièle~~rthe design, permitting and construction of thi~identifi~dneed the imorovement soecified in suboaraaraoh a above. which security may be expended by the C0I:J~ty. at it~<election. either () for such imorovement or (ii}';f~ril11,~~oYements to Orange Avenue between the projectiet1tr8cn(1eJånd Kings Highway as provided in paragraph 5 below:and. .. c~ Submit to the County security. in the same amount as determinedin;accordance with subparagraph b above. and in nèuon cOl1struêting a northbound left turn lane on Jenkins Roådat Orand&Avenue. which security shall be expended by the/CdÚnty for improvements to Orange Avenue between the project entrance and Kinas Hiahway as provided in oaraaraph 5 below. 3. No land clearing or site alteration permits shall be issued until the following items have been addressed or provided for a. Final Planned Unit Development approval has been granted for the area or phase of the project proposed for alteration. b. land clearing or site alteration permits shall only be issued for primary infrastructure areas. General lot clearing is specifically File No.: RZ-01-016 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-025 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '-' ""'" prohibited until a detailed lot line, tree survey, and grading plan is provided. This plan must provide for the preservation and protection of as much of the existing pine flatwood habitat as possible. c. A complete mitigation plan consistent with the requirements of the St. Lucie County Lane Development Code is provided. 4. Prior to the issuance of any building permits in the commercial portion of the project, Final Planned Development Site Plan approval must be granted by the Board of County Commissioners. Thecommercial area shall be limited to a maximum size of 3.5 acres and restricted to the uses described within the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. Nothing in these conditions shall be Interpreted to relieve the developer, his successors or assigns, from meeting any conditional use or other CN Zoning Di~rjc.t standards. No development of this phase may proceed ulitilthe imDrovements identified under condition number #5 have beerfcornpleted. at least 260 of the authorized dwelling units of the projêtf(4Qpercent) have been completed. 5. Prior to the issuance of anybuildin9Dermitwithin the Droiect. the develoDer shall reachaareement with thê<County regarding imDrovements to Orange Avenue between theöroiect entrance and Kinas Hiahway to improve safety and roadway caDacitv. a. Such agreement shall include the identification of aDproDriate imDrovements. theiestimatèd cost of the identified improvements. and the mechanism for fundlna identified imQroveménts. includina the security to be provided by the developer as set forth in subparagraphs 2.b and c above. b. Financial participation by the developer in the identified improvements shall be limited to the lessor of: ill The estimated cost of such improvements. or m The sum of 0) the security to be provided as set forth in subparagraDh 2.b and c above. and lii) the total estimated transDortation impact fees upon single-family lots within the project . ," The County agrees to cooperate with the develoDer in considerina whether to establish a municiDal services benefit unit or community develoDment district or other form or special taxing or assessment district acceptable to the County. for the proiect. if required. as a mechanism to accomDlish DreDayment File No.: RZ-01-016 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-025 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 '-' .." of transportation impact fees throuah the issuance of special assessment bonds. and construction of the identified improvements. ill the total assessment for each benefitted parcel lsinale- family lot), including all issuance expenses and a minimum two years of capitalized interest pavments. shall not exceed the transportation impacUeeirnposed or to be imposed upon a single-family dwelling on such lot. m the terms of such financing shall provide forpavments of interest on Iv for a period of not less than 10 years. with the principal amount plus applicable interestdueat maturity. provided. however~that bonds shall beöåid prior to maturity from prepayments made as lots are sold. d. The County and the developer shall enteräJ~ansportation impact fee credit aareement.or develoornêr'lt agreement respecting the prepayment of such fees. B. The property on which this Preliminary Planned I..JnitDevelopment Site Plan approval is granted is desc('ibed as follows: THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NqRJ'HEAST11~;THE NQRTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 LYING EAST OF EASTERLY· RIGHT -oF-WAYOFFLORIDASUNSHINE STATE PARKWAY ANDTHE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THÊNORTHEAST 1/4,EXOEÞTTHEREFROM THE FOLLOWING: FROMTHESOUTHWESTOORNEROFTHESOUTHWEST 1/4 OFTHE NORTHEAST 1/4 RUN NORTH ALONGTHEWEST LINE OFSAJ THWEST 1/4 OFTHE NORTHEAST 1/4 42.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH RIGHl'-P. NEOF NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER DRAINAGE CANAL NO. 45 FOR POINT OF BEGINNING; TH ............ ...........rmNUE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 465.00 FEET TOAPOINT; THENCE RUN EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST1/40FTHENPRTHEAST1/4, 793.80 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH PARALLEL WITH AFOREMENTlONEDWESTLlNE465.00 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CANAL NO. 45; THENCE RUNWES11i;4LONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINEA DISTANCE OF 793.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNIN<:ì.FURTHER EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 42.50 FEET OFTHESOUTHWEST 1/4 OFTHE NORTHEAsn/4iTHE NORTH 41.00 FEET OFTHE EAST 314 OF SAID SECTION 10, THE NORTH 39.50 FEET OFTHENORTHWEST 1/4 OFTHE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND THE EAST 48.50 FEET OF THE NORTHEAsn/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID LANDS. ALL LYING IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH: " ALL THAT CERTAIN LANDS LYING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LOCATED IN SECTION 1 0, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; SITUATED AND LYING EASTERLY OF FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE(ST ATE ROAD 91 )AS PER SUNSHINE STATE PARKWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP STATION 140+00 TO STATION 202+38.70, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, CONTRACT7.1, SHEET3 OF 5 AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: File No.: RZ-01-016 January 15. 2002 Resolution 02-025 Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 '-" .., COMMENCE AT A WOODEN HUB MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 10, THENCE NORTH 00°15'41" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OFTHE NORTHWEST 1140F SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 1 ,333.21 FEETTO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OFTHE SOUTH 112 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 89"35'21" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OFTHE SOUTH 112 OF THE NORTHWEST 1140F SECTION 1 0, A DISTANCE OF 311.05 FEETTO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 112 OFTHE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION '\ 10, FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 89°35'21" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH ~Z'\... LINE, A DISTANCE OF 954.07 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ~ FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE (STATE ROAD 91 ), THENCE SOUTH 14 °33'00" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY ~~ RIGHT-OF-WAYLINE,ADISTANCEOF1,238.80FEET;THENCEDEPARTING SAID RIG HT-O F-WAY NORTH 89°39'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°15'17" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 696.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °35'21 " EAST, A DISTANCE OF 622.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 112 OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE \ \ NORTHWEST 114 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTHOo015'33" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE A ...,' DISTANCE OF 500.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. \ ~ RESERVING ALL RIGHTS OF INGRESS, EGRESS, LIGHT, AIR, AND VIEW BETWEEN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE(STATE ROAD 91) SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 151.66 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. (Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1 ,800 feet east of the Florida Turnpike) This Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval shall expire on less final planned unitdevelopment approval is granted or an extension is granted in accordancewith Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. D. A Concurrency DeferralAffidavit, acopx otwhich is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community DevelopmentDirector on December 18, 2001. E. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A,whichplan shaHbeplaced on file with the St. Lucie County Community DevelopmentDlrector. After motion and second,theNote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX -' Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX File No.: RZ-01-016 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-025 Page 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ~ ...." PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 18th Day of December 2001. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: . Deputy Clerk CoUnty Attorney DJM o2-o25a(h) ,- File No.: RZ-01-016 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-025 Page 7 COMMISSION ACTION: D APPROVED U DENIED D OTHER To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: ~ (' (' ...", Agenda Request 5Q 12/04/01 Item Number Date: Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ [ ] [X] Quasi-JD [ X ] Board of County Commissioners Community Development Consider Draft Resolution 01-233 granting Prelimi Planned Unit for the project to be known as Palm Breezes Club - PUD for propert side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet east of the Florida.. ./y"" evelopment approval located on the north ike, ;' Roger Medema has requested a change in zoning for 15;~ ,62-Acres of land located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet .east of the Florida Turnpike, The stated purpose for the rezoning is to develop the proper1Y for 646 Single Family Lots in two residential phases and a 3,5 acre commercial parcel. (FiI~ No: RZ-01-016) N/A At the November 15, 2001, public hearing on this matter, the SI. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 1 (Mr. Merritt, against), with one member (Mr. Jones) absent and one member Mr, Matthes) abstaining, recommended approval for the requested change in zoning. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 01-233. CONCURRENCE: Douglas M, Anderson County Adminis!cator Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: '-" ( ( ·,t ., Commission Review: December 4, 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Interim Community Development Director DATE: November 28, 2001 SUBJECT: Application of Roger Medema for Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan approval for the Project to Be Known as Palm Breezes Club. (File No,: RZ-01-016) LOCATION: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet east of the Florida Turnpike. EXISTING ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) PROPOSED ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) LAND USE DESIGNATION: RU (Residential Urban) PARCEL SIZE: 151.62 Acres PROPOSED USE: 646 Single Family Lots. The proposed development plan also reserves 4 acres for development as a neighborhood commercial site consistent' with the provisions of Section 7.01.02 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. PROPOSED DENSITY: 4.26 du/acre " SURROUNDING ZONING: AG-1 (Agricultural -1 du/acre) to the north and west, AR-1 (Agricultural, Res.idential - 1 du/acre) to the east, south, and west. I (Institutional) to the northeast and southwest. RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family 2 du/acre) and CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) to the south. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is vacant, agricultural, and some residential. '-"' ( f ...., November 28, 2001 Page 2 Subject: Roger Medema File No.: RZ-01-016 The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) to the east, south, and west. RS (Residential Suburban) to the north. RE (Residential, Estate) to the west. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #11 (Shinn Road), is located approximately 9.5 miles to the southwest. UTILITY SERVICE: The Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) will service the subject property. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Orange Avenue is 100 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity will be required with Final Planned Unit Development approvals. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: . . 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed Preliminary Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, The PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning District is compatible with the RU Future Land Use and allows a maximum of 3 percent of the land area to be set aside for commercial uses. '\..-. f ( ,.." November 28, 2001 Page 3 Subject: Roger Medema File No.: RZ-01-016 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed Palm Breezes Club - PUD is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes maximum residential densities for the RU (Residential Urban) Future Land Use Category as 5 dwelling units per 1 acre. The proposed project is to be developed with a maximum residential density of 4.26 units per acre, therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. Policy 1.1.9.4 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes regulations providing that existing on-site native upland habitat be incorporated into required site plans as a part of open space areas, required landscaping, or as a part of minimum yard areas as is practicable is maintained. The proposed project proposes to preserve 18 percent (21.52 acres) of the native upland habitat on-site. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning and the accompanying Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan have been determined to be consistent with the general land uses in the surrounding area. The Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan indicate that the petitioned property is suitable for development at a density of up to 5 dwelling units per gross acre for a total of 758 possible units. The proposed development of 646 units allows for an overall density of 4.26 units an acre. ' 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment;.. In 1988, the Board of County Commissioners approved a request for the construction of a 600-unit mobile home park to be known as Ventura Club, Inc. on this site. The project name was changed in 1991 to Palm Breezes Club. Construction on this project was never begun and the approvals granted through Resolution 88-280 subsequently expired. On August 19, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners granted preliminary planned unit development approval for a new request for 646 mobile home units to be known as Palm Breezes Club. On July 21, 1998, the Board of County '-" f ( ..." November 28, 2001 Page 4 Subject: Roger Medema File No.: RZ-01-016 Commissioners granted a request for final planned unit development approval for Phase I of the project containing 352 units. Qn July 18, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners denied a request for a one-year extension of the site plan approval, which then expired on July 21, 2000, 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The development site is proposed to be served by the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) with water and sewer facilities. Theses services are available in the area along North Rock Road, approximately Y2 mile east of the subject property. The developer of Palm Breezes Club will be responsible for the extension of these services to the project site. The intended use for this rezoning is expected to create significant additional demands on public facilities in this area. Water and sewer service is available and will be provided by the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA). Access for the proposed project is provided on Orange Avenue. Staff is recommending two conditions addressing traffic and water and sewer availability in the area. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The applicant through the PUD (Planned Unit Development) process, has proposed a development plan that provides for the protection of environmentally sensitive areas. The applicant will need to obtain all permits relating to environmental impacts an the site prior to any construction occurring. These agencies include the Army Corps of Engineers (ACORE), South Florida Water Management Distriçt (SFWMD), and the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Com,mission. Prior to any construction on the site, a vegetation removal permit' application must be filed with and approved by the Public Works Department for the removal of any trees on the subject property; The existing wetlands on site will either be mitigated or preserved/incorporated on-site. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; \....t f (' -....J November 28, 2001 Page 5 Subject: Roger Medema File No.: RZ-01-016 An orderly and logical development pattern will occur with this change in zoning. The surrounding parcels of property are designated for residential uses. The proposed Palm Breezes Club is within the urban service boundary. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS The developer of Palm Breezes Club has submitted a petition for Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan approval for 646 conventionally constructed units on 151 acres located on the north side of Orange Avenue, adjacent to the Florida Turnpike. The subject property is currently vacant. A 50 foot wide easement for the Florida Gas Transmission Company runs diagonally through the property. The subject property is the location of a project previously approved in 1988 by the County Commission for the construction of a 600-unit mobile home park with a 4 acre commercial section on the front near the entrance. These approvals were granted through Resolutions 88-280, 89-322, and 90-330. These approvals expired with no building permits having been applied issued. In 1997, the Board of County Commissioners granted preliminary approval for a 646- unit mobile home park. In 1998, the Board of County Commissioners granted, through Resolution 98-144, Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for Phase I of 352 units of the project. On July 18, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners denied a request for a one-year extension of the site plan approval, which then expiréd on July 21,2000. ." In resubmitting the development plans for the property, the developer has Used essentially the same development pattern as the first two projects, excépt that the developer has increased the amount of contiguous open space and changed from mobile homes to conventionally constructed single-family homes. Attached is the site plan for the proposed project. As a Planned Unit Development, the project proposes to develop the subject property with some flexibility, such as the ability to cluster dwelling units to protect environmentally sensitive areas on site. The developer is thus able to reduce the environmental impacts on the property to a greater degree than with more conventional development. The proposed development will preserve 11.29 acres of existing wetlands on site. .'-' f c ..J November 28, 2001 Page 6 Subject: Roger Medema File No.: RZ-01-016 Section 7.01.03(1) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that 35% of the site must consist of open space, a minimum of 15% of which must be native upland habitat preserved in its natural condition. The planned development maintains 35.6% of the project area in total open space. Wetlands account for 11.29 acres, lake area consists of 14.24 acres, and Native Upland Preserve is 21.52 acres. The remainder of the project consists of those areas designated for residential development (buildings, roadway, driveways, sidewalks, and lift station). The developer provided a Transportation Impact Report (TIR) with the application. The TIR assessed the impacts of the development on both Orange Avenue and the major intersection streets within the subject area. County staff has reviewed the report. No specific lane capacity improvements are recommended to be required for this project. The developer will be required to construct a right turn lane for westbound Orange Avenue at the project entrance. No left turn lanes are being required for the entrance since it is anticipated that most of the trips to and from the project will be from the east. The TIR identified the need for the construction of two minor intersection improvements. The first improvement is at the intersection of South Jenkins Road and Orange Avenue. The report has identified the need for the construction of a northbound left turn lane at Orange Avenue. The second improvement need is at the intersection of North Rock Road and Orange Avenue. At this intersection the need for a southbound left turn lane has been identified. This lane is needed to be constructed before the build-out of this project. At the November 15, 2001, meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 1, with one member (Mr. Jones) absent and one member (Mr. Matthes) abstaining, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the Board approve the petition for change in zoning from the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) Zoning District. Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie Gounty Comprehensive Plan. . Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 01-233, which, if approved, would grant Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval and a Change in Zoning from the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club). Staff recommends that the Board approve the petition for Preliminary Planned Unit Development and a Change in Zoning, subject to the following conditions: ~. f ( ....¡ November 28, 2001 Page 7 Subject: Roger Medema File No.: RZ-01-016 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project, except those associated with any model or sales center, the developer of Palm Breezes Club shall construct at the project entrance a westbound right turn lane from Qrange Avenue into the project entry road. 2. Prior to any final development plan approvals for any portions of the area indicated as Phase II of the project, the developer shall be required to: a. Construct, to County standards and requirements, a dedicated, southbound, left turn lane on North Rock Road at the intersection with Orange Avenue; or, b. Submit to the County, sufficient security, in an amount to be determined by the County, to provide for the design, permitting and construction of this identified need. 3. No land clearing or site alteration permits shall be issued until the following items have been addressed or provided for A) Final Planned Unit Development approval has been granted for the area or phase of the project proposed for alteration. B) Land clearing or site alteration permits shall only be issued for primary infrastructure areas. General lot clearing is specifically prohibited until a detailed lot line, tree survey, and grading plan is provided. This plan must provide for the preservation and protection of as much of the existing pine flatwood habitat as possible. C) A complete mitigation plan consistent with the requirements of the St. Lucie County Lane Development Code is provided. 4. Prior to the issuance of any building permits in the commercial portion of the project, Final Planned Development Site Plan approval must be granted by the Board of County Commissioners. The commercial ßreS1 shall be limited to a maximum size of 3.5 acres and restricted to the uses described within the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zônihg District. Nothing in these conditions shall be interpreted to relieve the developer, his successors or assigns, from meeting any cOnditional use or other CN Zoning District standards. No development of this phase may proceed until at least 260 of the authorized dwelling units of the project (40 percent) have been completed. '-' f ( ....; November 28,2001 Page 8 Subject: Roger Medema File No.: RZ-01-016 If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED: ICP evelopment Director hf cc: Rich Ladyko. P.E. Roger Medema County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Planning Manager .' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 \...t f ....J (: RESOLUTION 01-233 FILE NO: RZ-01-016 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS PALM BREEZES CLUB - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence presented, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: CHANGE IN ZONING 1. Roger Medema,. presented a petition for a change in zoning from the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) Zoning District for certain property in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. On November 25, 2001, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended to this Board that the requested change in zoning from the PUD (Plann~d Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) Zoning District be granted. 3. On December 4, 2000, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property and granted final approval to the property described below. 4. Final action on the request for change in zoning is to be withheld until application for Final Planned Unit Development has been filed for review. SITE PLAN 5. The petitioner is proposing the construction of a residential project cqnsisting of 646 . Units in two residential phases and a 3.5 acre commercial parcel in Phase III for property located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet west of the Florida Turnpike. File No.: RZ-01-016 December 4, 2001 Resolution 01-233 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 '-" ( ....J f 6. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements. 7. On November 25,2001, the S1. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended to this Board that Preliminary Development Plan approval for the project to be known as Palm Breezes Club - PUD, be granted. 8, On December 4, 2001, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and granted Preliminary Development Site Plan approval for the property described below. 9. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of S1. Lucie County. 10. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 11. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. 12. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 13. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Preliminary Site Plan for the project to be known as Palm Breezes Club - A Planned Unit Development be, and the same is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Culpepper & Terpening., dated May 30, 2001, and date stamped received by the S1. Lucie County Community Development Director on May 31, 2001, for the property described below, subject to the following conditions.:. 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project, except those associated with any model or sales center, the developer of Palm Breezes Club shall construct at the project entrance a westbound right turn lane· from Orange Avenue into the project entry road. File No.: RZ-01-016 December 4, 2001 Resolution 01-233 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 '-" r ( ...,¡ 2. Prior to any final development plan approvals for any portions of the area indicated as Phase II of the project, the developer shall be required to: a. Construct, to County standards and requirements, a dedicated, southbound, left turn lane on North Rock Road at the intersection with Orange Avenue; or, b. Submit to the County, sufficient security, in an amount to be determined by the County, to provide for the design, permitting and construction of this identified need. 3. No land clearing or site alteration permits shall be issued until the following items have been addressed or provided for A) Final Planned Unit Development approval has been granted for the area or phase of the project proposed for alteration. B) Land clearing or site alteration permits shall only be issued for primary infrastructure areas. General lot clearing is specifically prohibited until a detailed lot line. tree survey, and grading plan is provided. This plan must provide for the preservation and protection of as much of the existing pine flatwood habitat as possible. C) A complete mitigation plan consistent with the requirements of the St. Lucie County Lane Development Code is provided. 4. Prior to the issuance of any building permits in the commercial portion of the project. Final Planned Development Site Plan approval must be granted by the Board of County Commissioners. The commercial area shall be limited to a maximum size of 3.5 acres and restricted to the uses described within the CN (Commercial. Neighborhood) Zoning District. Nothing in these conditions shall be interpreted to relieve the developer. his successors or assigns, from meeting any conditional use or other CN Zoning District standards. No development of this phase may proceed until at least 260 of the authorized dwelling units of the project (40 percent) have been completed. B. The property on which this Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval is granted is described as follows: THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 LYING EAST OF EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF FLORIDA SUNSHINE STATE PARKWAY AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, EXCEPT THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING: FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHÉAST 1/4 RUN NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/442.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER DRAINAGE CANAL NO. 45 FOR POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 465.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID File No.: RZ-01-016 December 4, 2001 Resolution 01-233 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 '-' ( .....J (; SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, 793.80 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH PARALLEL WITH AFOREMENTIONED WEST LINE 465.00 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CANAL NO. 45; THENCE RUN WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 793.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. FURTHER EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 42.50 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE NORTH 41.00 FEET OF THE EAST 3/4 OF SAID SECTION 10, THE NORTH 39.50 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND THE EAST 48.50 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID LANDS. ALL LYING IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH: ALL THAT CERTAIN LANDS LYING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LOCATED IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; SITUATED AND LYING EASTERLY OF FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE(ST A TE ROAD 91) AS PER SUNSHINE STATE PARKWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP STATION 140+00 TO STATION 202+38.70, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, CONTRACT 7.1, SHEET 3 OF 5 AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT A WOODEN HUB MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 10, THENCE NORTH 00\15'41" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 1,333.21 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 89\35'21" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, A DISTANCE OF 311.05 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 112 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 10, FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 89\35'21" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 954.07 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE (STATE ROAD 91), THENCE SOUTH 14\33'00" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1,238.80 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 89\39'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00\15'17" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 696.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89\35'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 622.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1'4 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 00\15'33" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 500.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RESERVING ALL RIGHTS OF INGRESS, EGRESS, LIGHT, AIR, AND VIEW BETWEEN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE(STATE ROAD 91), SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 151.66 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. (Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet east of the Florida Turnpike) C. This Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval shall expire on December 4, 2003, unless final planned unit developmen~approval is granted or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(8)(3), S1. Lucie County Land Development Code. File No.: RZ-01-016 December 4, 2001 Resolution 01-233 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ~ f (' '.wi D. A Concurrency Deferral Affidavit, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on December 4,2001. E. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the S1. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner John D. Bruhn PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 4th Day of December 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\WP\Resolution\FINISH ED,2001 \PBClub, PD\PBClubRES. wpd File No.: RZ-01-016 December 4, 2001 Resolution 01-233 Page 5 ..0 ::::J <\.1- EO <J.)Cf) -o<J.) ()N ~æ ~ à)a:J 0) °E a:- <\.I D- ~ ( ...", c ...\RI - z to r- o I r- o N a: .orA! ,o~tt~ r, ~ ] ~ t! ~ ~' ¡ .~! 5 f" f ~, : ~ ~ . . '" ~ u · u Ì ~ · · Co o \ Co , ... :: ... II: :: ~ II: Z ::) 0 ~ ü z ::) 0 0'fQ¡¡.' ):JJft'.. Ü a: UJ > æ ... ... z 'I ï= 'I a: II: ,.... <mN< ".. ..u.....,J <! Z II: ~ <! is .... ... ~ ... : ... V i .. ... S K: 1 S ii 1 AlNno:) 3380H:)33>iO ~ ('. -:,< ( ""'" A Petition of Roger Medema (Palm Breezes Club - PUD) for a Change In Zoning from PUD and AR-1 to PUD (Planned Unit Development). ¡ I I,f ICJI l::>ii¡ I~I ¡-!¡ I;¿I I I I I " o o a:: CJ '--1 L_' r t ~ 1ti.~t,..œ..a)lft)ledtorgltlef.pIInnk1grd~~OiYt_ N WhíIo!I ~fIIIort... ~ rnadIJ 10 ptMde Þ moIIlUIU-a CI;UØ ~pouibIe,'''nor.hrded /arUM.' ~twd>g doc:I.nw1L RZ 01-016 5iF4~~~ ~ '7J' ~ ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel Map prepared September 24, 2001 "" ( (' ...", Roger Medema (Palm Breezes Club - PUD) AG 1 I I 1.1 Iq¡ ¡::Ol I~r AG-1 ¡~I I I I I AR-1 C) ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel Map prepared September 24,2001 t RZ 01-016 >iF4~4~ .. ~ '7'1 ~_ 'TNI,,-.p'-t..ta:mpledlor~pIwri1gtnd~~q. N WI'* WW'J lIIIann. bien ITIIIÓIIIG ptMdII r. moItcurentlll1d ac:ctnIIt ! - 1rIormItb'I~,t"nçt~laruu".legIIybMInQdoc:u:1WIt. ~ '-" ( ( .,J Land Use Roger Medema (Palm Breezes Club - PUD) RS I I II lal I~I RS 13:1 I-!I I~I I I I I PIF RU 'JRE o '" C) R TM ,--, L_' , ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel Map prepared September 24, 2001 f RZ 01-016 5IY4~.~~ ~ 7~ nq ~ '- ~ çompiIIId lor~pI--*'CI WId,.,.... ~0"tJ. ~ ~.rIarI"'bwI n-..deto prcMde tl".-moetcurentrd ~ ir1IŒmItic:Jnpollble,lilnclnlW'ldudloruee.alllgll)'bid'lgdoc:unenl N '-"( ( ,.",¡ Roger Medema (Palm Breezes Club - PUD) ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel Map prepared September 24, 2001 t RZ 01-016 s¡,-4~~~~ rn. mtrp - ~ cotrØId brglOH~ If>d ~ ~ crioJ· N ""''''' IØoIthU,..... INldlIO pt'OIiØe IN moIIourrertrd ~ Inbn...rIonpoMlble.It"noI~U"-_I~blndlngdcJc:un-.R. '-" ( ( ..." AGENDA ITEM 3: R02er Medema - File No. RZ-OI-016 Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 3 was the application of Roger Medema for a Change in Zoning from the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-I (Agricultural, Residential - 1 dulacre) Zoning Districts to the POO (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) Zoning District for 151.62 acres of property located generally on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet east of the Florida Turnpike. The developer of this project has submitted a petition for Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan approval for 646 conventionally constructed units, ,4 acres in reserve for Commercial, Neighborhood uses consistent with Section 7.01.0 of th nd Development Code. The subject property is currently vacant and has a fifty-~ e easement for the Florida Gas Transmission Company runs diagonally through y. The proposed development utilizes essentially the same development pattern a approvedoject for this site except that the developer has increasedxthe amoun 0 en s e and changed the mobile homes to conventionally constructed singl~ The Land Development Code requires that 35% òfthe<s' e must consist open space, a minimum of 15% of which must be native upland habitatpr d in its natural condition. This planned development maintains 35.6% of the projÿÇt are open space. Wetlands are 11.29 acres, lake area consists of 14.24 acres, and tive rve is 21.52 acres. The remainder of the project consists of those, . nated tial development. The developer has provided a Transportation @g «TIR), assessed the impacts of the development above Orange Avenue an<1¡!tlle m~j. 've;§ treets within the subject area. The TIR. identified the need for the c ructioDf.of tworrµ tersection improvements. One is at the intersection of South Jenki ad a range Ayenue and the other is at the intersection of North Rock Road and Orang petitioner was present. Mr. Richard Ladyko stated he is with the ning and represents the applicant. Mr. Lounds asked why there ovements on Jenkins Road since it is so far from this development. Mr. . Murphy, Interim Community Development Director requested that ied; the future impact of this development on that intersection would ovements. Mr. Trias questioned how changing the current AR-I zoning to nt with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Kelly explained that the, rezo IS actually already partially POO and partially AR-l and the majority of the project is a previously approved POO, which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. and the Preliminary Planned Unit atible existing and proposed uses in the area. The . ew as set forth in the Land Development Code and is not in n. Staff, therefore, recommends that you forward this . ssioners with a recommendation of approval subject to e staff report. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Ladyko if there are any plans to bring Orange Avenue up to a standard two-lane highway. Mr. Ladyko stated that he was not aware of any currently pending with the County but Staff has asked for turning lanes to be constructed at the project entrance as well as the intersection improvements previously identified. The developer concurs with those UNOFFICIAL Subject to Planning & Zoning Commission Approval November 15, 2001 Page 13 ~ ( ( ...., recommendations. Mr. Merritt stated that Orange Avenue already has very narrow substandard lanes and this development will increase traffic on that road. Mr. Terpening stated that this project is paying in excess of $1 million dollars to the County in traffic impact fees and how the County elects to use those funds could affect that roadway. Mr. Hearn asked if any consideration regarding the convenience store was made so people would not have to go out onto a main corridor to get to it. Mr. Ladyko stated he believed that was the reason for the commercial component of the development at the project entrance, immediately off of Orange A venue. Mr. Kelly stated that the PUD allows for up to the 3% of the project land to be used for commercial purposes, for that very reason, Mr. Lounds asked where the Fort Pierce Utili 'es would tie into the development. Mr. Ladyko stated there is approximately a 2,000 inear ~ ~c~ xtension of Fort Pierce Utilities water main from the Rock Road/Orange Aven on westerly to the project. He continued there is approximately 2,500 linear feet of £ xtension from a lift station that exists on Rock Road in front of the stockade faeilit nded southyJ:ly on Rock Road and then westerly again on Orange A ven~F; . There i~~ 5,500 r 'ear feet of main extension associated with the project being done,!n conju Pierce Utilities. Mr. Lounds asked if that extension would álsobenefit anyone els develop in that area and Mr. Ladyko advised that is correct. Mr. Hearn stated that the area for the possible co~y~nienc how can they propose that. Mr. Ladyko advised. ' there 1 up the PUD zoning and that portion is includedih UD. not zoned commercial, so cial component allowed Chairman McCurdy opened the PubliçUearin Seeing no one, Chairman McCu $ closed the Public,Heåring. condition of Orange Avenue and doesn't ke improvements at an intersection that is ske if it would be possible to have that money r than t e intersection of Orange Avenue and Jenkins Road. k into it with Mr. Murphy and see if that is a possibility or Vening. Mr. Lounds questioned if this project is outside of stated it is not. r considering the testimony presented during the Public mcnts, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section nty Land Developmcnt Code, I hereby move that the Planning and recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County t approval to the application of Roger Medema for a Change in Zoning lanned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-l (Agricultural, Do/Acre) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Paim. Bre ub) Zoning District because I think it adds to the quality of development west of Kings Highway. I think that the development wiII give our residents a choice other than north or immediately south in St. Lucie County. I also want to add an amendment that the road improvements are made to Orange Avenue west ùf Kings Highway, between Kings Highway and the Turnpike overpass. Motion seconded by Mr. Hearn. UNOFFICIAL Subject to Planning & Zuning Commission Approval Novcmbcr 15,2001 Page 14 \.or f:': f 'wIiI Upon a roll call vote the motion passed with a vote of 6-1 (with Mr. Merritt voting against because he feels Orange A venue is a substandard road) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval. UNOFFICIAL Subject to Planning & Zoning Commission Approval November 15, 2001 Page 15 '"~V J.oJ ~4 ...'"--........ or --~. ......................- .....-..--........J - ......_ ... ....__.. ._.... ___a...... r- - . "'"' ~.. f """, Joseph G. Miller 5500 Orange Avenue Fort Pierce. Florida >4947 , ,. It /-Þ rÄ,~ ¿~ ~ Pi. ~htJ~ - ;::.2£ -# /22-6J-óJ~ J. 4- a.- I~ tV¿ ¡ tf-fVÐ 6~ ~ /~ pc);t.L wß 1J/;::¿ ()~. ~¿L Ý¿I..- j-¡ <I!- 51--. L~ 4 ~ V-62~JSf/ \.. (' (. ." AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDA Y, DECEMBER 4, 2001 6:00 P.M. ROGER MEDEMA has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and the AR-l (Agricultural. Residential - 1 dulacre) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: Norlh sMe of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800feet east of the Florida Turnpike. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in adYG!lce of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners " November 21, 2001. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune. newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on November 19, 2001. File No. RZ-01-016 \.,.. ( November 19,2001 ( """" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Developmellt Code. you are hereby advised that Roger Medema has petitioned 51. Lucie County for a Change of Zoning from the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and the AR-I (Agricultural, Residential - I du/acre) Zoning Districts to the POO (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) Zoning District. Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet east of the Florida Turnpike. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on Tuesday, December 4, 2001, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Buüding Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission should be received by the County Planning Division at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing 'will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary. a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the 51. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (561) 462- 1777 or T.D.D. (561) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call 561/462-1582 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number RZ-OI-016. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ~~/~ Frannie Hutchinson, Chairwoman .' JOHN O. Of'\UHN Dimicr No 1 . DOUG COWARD. Disrricr No 2 . PAULA Ä. LEWIS. Dimier No. J . F!1.ANNIE HUTCHINSON. DiSHier No.4. CUFF OARNES, Disnicr N::: j Counry Admlnistrafor - Douglas M. Anderson 2JOO Virginia Avenue . Fort Pierce, FL J4952-5652 Adminisrratlan: (561) 462-1590 . Planning: (561) 462-2522 . GISrrechnical Services (561) 462 155J EconomIC Developmenr: (561) 462-1550 . Fox (561) 462-1581 TourisrlConvenrion: (561) 462-1529 . Fox: (561) 462-21J2 I~ f ST,LUClE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA December 4, 200 1 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCER/;'i' NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County land Development Code ond ,he provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, the following applicants have requested thul the St. Lucie Counry Board of Commissioners consider their following requ-est: I Glmsmon I).evelopment Corporation for a Change in Zoning from the RM·5 'Residential, Muitipl€-Fomity .. 5 dU/C1<::re), IX (Indu,>hial. Extraction) and CN (Commercial, Neighbor- !¡ooúj LOlling Oìsrricls to the PUD (p!onncd Unit Development - Sitv~loke) Zoning Oistrict for the following dcsoibeu property: ~EING All THAT PART OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, Sf. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING NORTH OF THE TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD, AND ALL THAT PART OF THE WEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE ..0 EAST, LYING NORTH Of SAID TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; I ESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM A PARCEl OF APPROXIMATElY 2.9 ACRES DESCRIBED AS, A PART OF THE WEST 1"6, 34 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE- QUARTER Of SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. DESCRIBED AS rGllOWS, BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION Of THE NORTH-SOUTH ONE-QUARTER SECTION LINE WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE Of THE SUNSHINE STATE PARK- WAY FEEDER ROAD. WHICH POINT IS 86-6' FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE- QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 39 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE SUNSHINE. STATE PARKWAY FEEDER ROAD, A DISTANCE Of 205_62 FEET TO A POINT, WHICH' POINT AT ITS CLOSEST DISTANCE IS 146_3.. FEET FROM THE NORTH-SOUTH ONE-I QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECT10N 12. TOWNSHIP J" SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST; THENCE NORTH. PARALLEL WITH THE SAID NORTH-SOUTT-i ONE-QUARTER. SECTION LINE, A DISTANCE OF 847.B4 FEET; THENCE WEST '46,34 FEET TO THE SAID NORTH·SOUTH ONE-QUARTER SECTION LINE. THENCE SOUTH AlONG SAlD ONE-QUARTER SECTION LINE, ADISTANCE OF 98B,3" FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO INCLUDING ANY AND ALL RIGHT, TlTLE'AND INTEREST IN A CERTAlN EASE- MENT DATED OCTOBER 27. 1970, FILED NOVEMBER 16. '970 AT O,R, BOOK lBB. PAGE 907, CLERK'S FILE NO_ 200989, ST, LUCIE COUNTY RECORDS; EASEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 16. 1970, ATiO_R, BOOK 188, PAGE 908, CLERK'S fiLE NO. 200990. ST. LUCIE COUNTY REC&DS¡'AND EASEMENT DATED OCTOBER 12. '970, FILED NOVEMBER '6. 1970, AT O_R_ BOOK lB8. PAGE 896-897. CLERK'S FILE NO. 200987, ST_ LUCIE COUNTY RECORDS. ' . EXCEPTING THEREFROM, A PART OF THE SOUTHEÀST ONE-QUARTER OF ·SECTlON 12. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, COMMENC:NG AT THE OF THE NORTH-SOUTH ()NE-QUARTERSECTION Lll'ÌfWlTH .THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE Of- TI:IE .SUNSHINE STATE PARtt:NAY FEEOER ROUTE, WHICH POINT IS 86.61 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNEt OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER Of sAID SEC- TION 12, TOWNSHIP 39 SOUTH. RANGE 3..· EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE SUNSHINE STATE PARtt:NAY FEEDER ROUTE A DISTANCE OF 205.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREBY DESCRIBED; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE RIGHT.QF. WAY OF SUNSHINE STATE PARtt:NAY FEEDER ROUTE, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTH,SOUTH ONE-QUARTER SECTION LINE TO A POINT THAT WOULD BE INTERSECTED 8Y A LINE EXTENDED DUE EAST FROM A POINT ON SAID NORTH-SOUTH ONE·QUARTER SECTIO.N LlNE.THAT IS 901.72 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUfHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE- QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER Of SAID SECTION 12; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID LINE EXTENDED DUE EAST TO A POINT THAnSDUE,NORTHOf THE POINT OF BEGINNING;T\iENCESOUTH AND PARALlEl WITH SAID ONE'QUARTER SECTION LINE, A DISTANCE OF 847.B" FEET. MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. OVERALL PARCEL CONTAINS 185,91 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. location: West side of the Turnpike F~def Road, directly $Outh of Spanish lakes Country i Club Village. ! 2., Roger Medema for a Change in Zoning from the PUD (plonned Unit Development - Palm I Breezes Club) and the AR- (Agricultural, Residential -1 du/ocrel Zoning Distrlds to the PUO {Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Clubt Zoning DIstrict. for the following described property: THE NORTH 1/2 Of THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST '/4 LYING EAST OF EASTERLY RIGHT-Of,WAY OF flORIDA SUNSHINE STATE PARK- WAY AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of THE NORTHEAST 1/4, EXCEPT THEREFROM THE FOlLOWING, -'. '- - -. ..... ,-. ~ FROM THE SOUTHWEST{.--"ER OF THE SO,....EST ,/.. OF THE NORTHEAST '/4 RUN NORTH ALONG'· 'EST LINE OF s-.OUTHWEST '/"OF THE NORTH- EAST 1/4 ..2-S0 FEET. ",,;E OR LESS. TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER DRAINAGE CANAL NO. ..5 FOR POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF ..65_00 FEET TO'A POINT; THENCE RUN EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH, WEST 1/" OF THE NORTHEAST ,/.., 793.BO FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH PARALLEL WITH AfOREMENTIONED WEST LlI'oIE 465_00 fEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF,WAY LINE OF SAID CANAL NO. 45; THENCE RUN WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF. WAY liNE A DISTANCE Of 793.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING_ FURTHER EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 42_50 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/", THE NORTH ..1.00 FEET Of THE EAST 3/4 Of SAID SECTION 10. THE NORTH 39.50 fEET Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND THE EAST 48.50 feET OF THE NORTHEAST 1/" OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID LANDS. ALL lYING IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST_ LUCIE COUN- T'Y, FlORIDA TOCETHf-f: WIrf-1 ALL níAI CERTAIN lANDS LYING IN Sf. LUCIE COUNTY, flORIDA; LOCATED IN SECTION 10. TOWNSHiP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, SITUATED AND LYING EAST- ERLY OF fLORIDA'S TURNPIKE (STATF ROAD 911 AS PER SUNSHINE STATE PARKWAY RIGHT ·OF-WAY MAP STATION 140+00 TO STAflON 202+38.70. ST. LUCIe COUN- TY, CONTRACT 71, SHEET 3 OF 5 AND BeiNG MORE PART/cULARL Y DESCRIBED AS fOlLOWS COMMENC, Ar A WOODEN HUB MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 10, THENCE NORTH 00 15'41" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 1,333.21 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 89 35'21" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE Of THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, A DISTANCE Of 31 LOS FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of SECTION 10. FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE CONTINUE NORTH B9 35'21" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 95.._07 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY liNE OF FlORIDA'S TURNPIKE (STATE ROAD 91), THENCE SOUTH l4 33'00" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE Of 1.238.80 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 89 39'22" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 15.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 lS'7" EAST A DISTANCE OF 696,62 fEET; THENCE SOUTH B9 35'2'- EAST. A DISTANCE OF 6'22_06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST ,/.. OF THE NORTHWEST lf4 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE 'NORTH 00 15'33" EAST. ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 500,00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING_ . RESERVING AIL RIGHTS OF INGRESS. EGRESS. LIGHT. AIR; AND VIEW BETWEEN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND flORIDA'S TURNPIKE (STATE ROAD 91) . SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 151.66 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. location: North side of Orange Åvenue, approximately 1,800 feet easl of the-Florida Turnpike. 3. John Carroll High School for a Chonge in Zoning from the. RS·3 (Residentiat Single- family - 3 du/acrs) Zoning Oistriq to the I (Institutionaij' Zoning District for fhe following described property: THE WEST 105 FEET OF THE NORTH 316 FEET Of THE SOUTH 3..6 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER Of THE· SOUTH. WEST ONE-QUARTER Of SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH. RANGE ..0 EAST OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS Of ST. LUCIE COUNTY. flORIDA, . lcx:otion: North side of Delaware Avenue, opproJ(imately 700 feet ecst of Harhnan. Road. 4.-Timothy and Debro Rose Cor Wash. fOf a Conditional Use Permit foro car wash facility "in the CN (Commercial, NeighbOrhood) Zoning Oistrict for the following desaibed property: . LOTS 11 & 12, BLOCK 169. LAKEWOOD PARK, UNIT 12^- AS RECORDED.!N PLAT .BOOK 11, PAGE 35. PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST_LUClE·COUNTY. FLORIDA l~otion: 5321 ,Sunshine State Parkway. , J... PUBLIC HEARINGS will be he'd in Commission Chambers, Roger Poitras Annex., 3rd Floor, Sf. lvcie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia A.venue, Fort Pierce. Florida on October 16. 2001, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or os soon tnereofter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 2860105, Florida $tctute5, if a person decides to CJppeol any I deCI$I{)n mode by a boord, agency, or COmml$$lon with respect to ony maner consIdered at a meeting or heoring, he will need a record of the proceedings. and that. for such purpo$es, he mo)' need to ensure that a verbatim record of the ~oceedings IS mode, which record mclude$ the testlmoC"ly and evidence upön wl-IIeh the appeal Is t~ be. ba5~. I BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS . ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA - ¡ /5/ Frannie HlJtehin50n, CHAIRWOMAN . Publish: Noyember 19, 2001 '22827B6 The Tribune, Monday, November 19, 2001 '-' .... ~ ( { """" Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 11/15/01 File Number RZ-01-016 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Manager {JPi- November 9,2001 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Application of Roger Medema for a Change in Zoning from the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-01-016) LOCATION: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet east of the Florida Turnpike.. EXISTING ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) and AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) PROPOSED ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) LAND USE DESIGNATION: RU (Residential Urban) 151.62 Acres PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: 646 Single Family Lots. The proposed development plan also reserves 4 acres for development as a neighborhood commercial site consistent with the provisions of Section 7.01.02 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. .' SURROUNDING ZONING: AG-1 (Agricultural -1 du/acre) to the north and west, AR-1 (Agricultural, Resìdéntial - 1 du/acre) to the east, south, and west. I (Institutional) to the northeast and southwest. RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family 2 du/acre) and CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) to the south. '-"' (; C" ..." November 9, 2001 Page 2 Subject: Palm Breezes Club - PUD File No.: RZ-01-016 SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is vacant, agricultural, and some residential. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) to the east, south, and west. RS (Residential Suburban) to the north. RE (Residential, Estate) to the west. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #11 (Shinn Road), is located approximately 9.5 mifes to the southwest. UTILITY SERVICE: The Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) will service the subject property. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-Of-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Orange Avenue is 100 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity will be required with Final Planned Unit Development approvals. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET fORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning an'd Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Codê;' The proposed Preliminary Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. This Planned Unit Development will result in a lesser density than that which would be allowed under current zoning. There are a total of 646 units. . If the subject property were developed at its maximum residential density, 758 units may be possible. Through the PUD process, the Land Development Code "\...- (' ( ...., November 9,2001 Page 3 Subject: Palm Breezes Club - PUD File No.: RZ-01-016 allows for development of this type that includes up to three percent of a PUD to be developed as commercial property, 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed amendment would be consistent with all elements of St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning District is compatible with the RU Future Land Use and allows a maximum of 3 percent of the land area to be set aside for commercial uses. The proposed project and change in zoning will, for example, allow the applicant to develop the subject property in a manner that encourages the preservation of environmentally sensitive wetlands on site. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning and the accompanying Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan have been determined to be consistent with the general land uses in the surrounding area. The Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan indicate that the petitioned property is suitable for development at a density of up to 5 dwelling units per gross acre for a total of 758 possible units. The proposed development of 646 units allows for a density of 4.26 units an acre. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; In 1988, the Board of County Commissioners approved a request for the construction of a 600-unit mobile home park to be known as Ventura Club, Inc. on this site. The project name was changed in 1991 to Palm Breezes Club. Construction on this project was never begun and the approvals granted through Resolution 88-280 subsequently expired. q(1 August 19, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners granted preliminarY planned unit development approval for a new request for 646 mobile home units to be known as Palm Breezes Club. On July 21. -1998, the Board of County Commissioners granted a request for final planned unit development approval for Phase I of the project containing 352 units. On July 18, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners denied a request for a one-year extension of the site plan approval. which then expired on July 21, 2000. \wt (' c .."" November g, 2001 Page 4 Subject: Palm Breezes Club - PUD File No.: RZ-01-016 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The development site is proposed to be served by the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) with water and sewer facilities. Theses services are available in the area along North Rock Road, approximately Y:z mile east of the subject property. The developer of Palm Breezes Club will be responsible for the extension of these services to the project site. The intended use for this rezoning is expected to create significant additional demands on public facilities in this area. Water and sewer service is available and will be provided by the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA). Access for the proposed project is provided on Orange Avenue. Staff is recommending two conditions addressing traffic and water and sewer availability in the area. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The applicant through the PUD (Planned Unit Development) process, has proposed a development plan that provides for the protection of environmentally sensitive areas. The applicant will need to obtain all permits relating to environmental impacts on the site prior to any construction occurring. These agencies include the Army Corps of Engineers (ACORE), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), and the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. Prior to any construction on the site, a vegetation removal permit application must be filed with and approved by the Public Works Department for the¡ removal of any trees on the subject property. The existing. wetlands òn site will either be mitigated or preserved/incorporated on-site. . 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern will occur with this change in zoning. The surrounding parcels of property are designated for residential uses. ~ c (" ""'" November 9,2001 Page 5 Subject: Palm Breezes Club - PUD File No.: RZ-01-016 8. Whether the proposed amendmer¡tt would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS The developer of Palm Breezes Club has submitted a petition for Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan approval for 646 conventionally constructed units on 151 acres located on the north side of Orange Avenue, adjacent to the Florida Turnpike. The subject property is currently vacant. A 50 foot wide easement for the Florida Gas Transmission Company runs diagonally through the property. The subject property is the location of a project previously approved in 1988 by the County Commission for the construction of a 600-unit mobile home park with a 4 acre commercial section on the front near the entrance. These approvals were granted through Resolutions 88-280, 89-322, and 90-330. These approvals expired with no building permits having been applied issued. In 1997, the Board of County Commissioners granted preliminary approval for a 646-unit mobile home park. In 1998, the Board of County Commissioners granted, through Resolution 98-144, Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for Phase I of 352 units of the project. On July 18, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners denied a request for a one-year extension of the site plan approval, which then expired on July 21,2000. In resubmitting the development plans for the property, the developer has used essentially the same development pattern as the first two projects, except that the developer has increased the amount of contiguous open space and changed from mobile homes to conventionally constructed single-family homes. Attached is the site plan for the proposed project. As a Planned Unit Development, the projeçt proposes'to develop the subject property with some flexibility, such as the ability to clustér dwelling units to protect environmentally sensitive areas on site. The developer is thus able to reduce the environmental impacts on the property to a greater degree than with more conventional development. The proposed development will preserve 11.29 acres of existing wetlands on site. Section 7.01.03(1) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that 35% of the site must consist of open space, a minimum of 15% of which must be native upland habitat preserved in its natural condition. The planned development maintains \.,.I f f ..." November 9,2001 Page 6 Subject: Palm Breezes Club - PUD File No.: RZ-01-016 35.6% of the project area in total open space. Wetlands account for 11.29 acres, lake area consists of 14.24 acres, and Native Uplar;1d Preserve is 21.52 acres. The remainder of the project consists of those areas designated for residential development (buildings, roadway, driveways, sidewalks, and lift station). The developer provided a Transportation Impact Report (TIR) with the application. The TIR assessed the impacts of the development on both Orange Avenue and the major intersection streets within the subject area. County staff has reviewed the report. No specific lane capacity improvements are recommended to be required for this project. The developer will be required to construct a right turn fane for westbound Orange Avenue at the project entrance. No left turn lanes are being required for the entrance since it is anticipated that most of the trips to and from the project will be from the east. The TIR identified the need for the construction of two minor intersection improvements. The first improvement is at the intersection of South Jenkins Road and Orange Avenue. The report has identified the need for the construction of a northbound left turn lane at Orange Avenue. The second improvement need is at the intersection of North Rock Road and Orange Avenue. At this intersection the need for a southbound left turn lane has been identified. This lane is needed to be constructed before the build-out of this project. Staff has determined that the proposed zoning designation and the Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan are compatible with the existing and proposed uses in the area. This petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to the following co~ditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project, except those associated with any model or sales center, the developer of Palm Breezes Club shall construct at the project entrance a westbound right tum.lane from Orange Avenue into the project entry road. ' 2. Prior to any final development plan approvals for any portions of the area indicated as Phase II of the project, the developer shall be required to: a. Construct, to County standards and requirements, a dedicated, southbound, left turn lane on North Rock Road at the intersection with Orange Avenue; or, '-"' (" [ ...." November 9,2001 Page 7 Subject: Palm Breezes Club - PUD File No.: RZ-01-016 b. Submit to the County, sufficient security, in an amount to be determined by the County, to provide for the design, permitting and construction of this identified need. 3. No development activity of any type shall be permitted on the proposed commercial tract included in this development until a revised Transportation Impact Report has been submitted and approved by St. Lucie County assessing the impacts of this commercial development on the roadways in the surrounding impact area. 4. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer of Palm Breezes Club shall be required to submit a utility agreement with the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority for the provision of utility service for the proposed project. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: County Administrator County Attorney Richard Ladyko, P.E. Roger Medema File .' ~ f ( """" Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations ( E AR-1 AGRICUL TURAL, RESIDENTIAL - 1 ( 1 . Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and proteqt an environment suitable for single-family dwellings at a maximum density of one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre, together with such other uses as may be necessary for and compatible with very low density rural residential surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01 ,02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00,00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Family day care homes. (9991 b. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) . c. Single-family detached dwellings. (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04,00. 4. Dimensional Regulations ( Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking Requirements Off-street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. 6, Conditional Uses a. Crop services (O12) b. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of anQther such family residential home. (999) c. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999) d. Kennels - completely enclosed. (01521 e. Landscaping & horticultural services (078) f. Retail: (1) Fruits and Vegetables. (5431 g. Riding stables, (7999) ~ h. Veterinary services. (014) Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7,10.23 (999) 7. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8,00.00, and include the following: Adopted August 1.1990 101 Revised Through 08101/00 .. \p ( (~ ...., Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations a. Agriculture (farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling). (011021 b, Animals. subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.03. (999) c. Guest house subject to the requirements of 3ectlon 7.10,04, (999) d. Mobile Home subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05. (999J e. Retail and wholesale trade - subordinate to the 'primary authorized use or activity. .' ~ Adopted August 1.1990 102 Revised Through 08/01/00 ST -,.. '___---,/ . l.UClE COUNTY ( 'ING ANDr· ·'¡G COMMISSION PlJL. ¿ARING A ,.. ....·THrsM . ~be.-J5.2 ", . EETING WASRESCHErjUlED FROM OCT08ER25. 2001 .... . ' TO WHOM IT MAY.CONCERN, . ,. . ;1/ NonCE is hereby Olven ¡~ accordanca~i.tfJ Sect" IJ 00 Developmenl Code and Ihe I"ovl,/o", "d'tfoe;:" : ,03 o/'he 5.. lUde County land 1~1I~""ng oppll<onls have '<qve""" tho1 ihe S. l~~ COUnty Ca_ehen,'ve Plan, Iher. mISSIOn considet- their following request: . ounty PJannmg and Zoning Corn_ 1. Gla~sltlan De-ve/opmenf Corporation ~ a hon . '. ! MU",pl.,-fomHy_ 5 du/ac'<J IX (Indu,"I,,1 CE " g~,'n )lo,;;¡,"'::to.. Ihe RM-5 (Re"denOla/. ¡ hOod) Zan'ng D''''¡d, 10 the PUD (Plann"" 'un7, ~ '0;' a N Kom""'dal, Nclghba,_ (Of" !he foflowìng de~cribed property:, eve opm~f - Sllverlol:eJ Zoning Dis!rid BE~NG Atl THAT PART Of THE EAST SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST Sf tu lONE-HALF OF SECTION 12, rOWNSHW 34 TURNPIKE fEEDER ROAD 'AND Al~ ETH<;"~UNTY. flORloA. lYING NO"", Of THE SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP' 34 SOU PART Of THE WEST ONE-QUARTER Of TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD, TH, RANGE 40 EAST. lYING NORTH OF SAID lESS AND EXCEPTING THEREfRO DESCRIBED AS, A PART Of THE ~E:r ~AJ/CH OF APPROXlMATH Y 2.9 ACRES QUARTER Of SECTION 12 TOWNSHIP 34 ~~ 3: fEET Of THE SOUTHEAST ONE_ fOLLOWS, ' . U H, RANGE 39 EAST. DESCRIBED AS 8EGINNING A T THE INTERSECTION .. LINE WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGH~¿;~A~~~H-SOUTH ONE,QUARTER SECTION WAY fEEDER ROAD, WHICH POINT IS 86.61 E Of THE SUNSHINE STATE PARK, CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 0 fEET SOUTH Of THE NORTHEAST Of SAID SECTION 12 TOWNSH7"E-PUARTER Of THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER EASTERl Y ALONG THÉ NORTHERl Y :,~~~H. RANGE 34 EAST, THENCE NORTH_ PARKWAY FEEDER ROAD A DISTANCe Of 20ÜWAY liNE Of THE SUNSHINE STATE A T ITS CLOSEST DISTANCE IS. ¡ 46-34 fEET : ~ET TO A POINT. WHICH POIN T ¡ QUARTER SECTION LINE Of SAID S R M THE NORTH-SOUTH ONE_ EAST, THENCE NORTH PARAllEL ~~~~~EI2. TOWNSHIP 34 SOI:JTH, RANGE 39 I SECTION LINE. A DISTÁNCE Of SAID NORTH-SOUTH ONE-QUARTER ' SAID NORTH-SOUTH ONE-QUAR.: ~. 7 f ECT f~ TH ENCE WEST 146,34 fEET TO THE I ONE-QUARTER SECTION LINE,. AD· LINE; THENCE SOOTH ALONG SAID POINT Of 8EGINNING. . ,_ ~.!~CE Of 988.3HEET. MORE OR lESS TO THE . . I AlSO INCLUDING ANY AND AlL RIGIfr I MENT DATED OCT08ER 27 i970 filED r:Jb~ INTEREST IN A CERTAIN EASE_ I PAGE 907. CLERK'S FILE NO 2OÓ9119 ER 16, 1970 AT O.R 800K 188 I DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1970' AT 0 . ST. LUaE COUNTY RECORDS; EASEMENT 200990. ST, LUCIE COUNTY iEC&DS;~~ 188. PAGE 908. CLERK'S FILE NO I fILED NOVEM8ER 16 1970 AT 0' EMENT DATED OCTOBER 12 1970' 200987. ST,LUCIE CÓUNTYÍ1fCO,¡~:OOK 188, PAGE 896-897. CLERK'S file NO' EXCEmNG THEREfROM, A-4'AR;~,",,- . . .- . . I 12. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH. RAN8í:F.39~~ fJT·lITHEAST ÇNE-QUARTER Of SECTION: '. .""" ,DESCRl8ED AS fOllOWS, : COMMENCING ATTHE OF TH{NORTH ' THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-()F-WAY.UNE ~~':mONE-QUARTER SECTION liNE WITH I ROUTE. WHICH f'OJNT IS 86;61 FEET SOUTH . S~NSHINE STATE PARKWAY FEEDER SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF 'THE ·S~~E NORTHEAST CORNER Of THE TlON 12. TOWNSHIP 39 SO"Tu RANG . ONE-QUARTER Of S""D see, ALONG THE. NORTHERLY RIGH ~,,~ . I,' 34 EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY FEEDER ROUTE A DISTANCE O/;g;~"r~~ LINE OF THE SUNSHINE STATE PARKWA Y TRACT HEREBY DESCRIBED, .... ET TO Tl:tE POINT Of BEGINNING Of THE fROM SAID POINT Of 8EGiNNJNG W. . . WAY Of SUNSHINE STATE PARKWAY ;:'E~~RR:;';!..~TERlY AlONG THE RIGHT-QF_ THENCE NORTH PARAU.El· WITH SAID _u". A DISTANCE Of 200.00 fEET- . liNE TO A POINT THAT WÒUW 8 NORTH-SOOTH ONE-QU"'RTER 5,ECTlO"¡ : FROM A POINT ON SAID NORm!i.~~RSg=reD 8Y A LINE EXTENDED DUE EAST " 90 1,72 fEET NORTH Of THE SO· . NE-QUARTER SECTION LINE THAT IS . QuARTER Of THE SOUTHEAST ON~~RST CORNER Of THE NORTHwEST ONE! AlONG SAID liNE fXTENDEb DUE . TER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE WESI POINT Of 8EGINNING. THENCE SO EAST TO A f'OJNT THAT IS DUE NORTH Of THE SECTION liNE,. A DISTÁNC~ Òf é4~ ~ PARAllEL WITH SAID ONE-QUARTER BEGINNING, ¡ -..' ,MORE OR lESS TO THE POINT OF ~.. , . OVERAll PARCEL CONTAINS 185,91 AcR~S, MORE OR lESS. locorioo: West side 01 the rum' 11::. Feed ... . Club Village, p... ROod. dwoctly SOVfh al Sponi,h lok., Counl')' 2. Rag... Mod..., Ie< 0 Cn.,nge'ln Zoning from tfoe P . ~I Bieo.e, Club) and the AR I (,;,g lev""'" UD {Planned 'Un,1 D..elapmenl _ Pal.. . PUD (P'onned Unit 0 evel~pmen....'.. ;. _. P. 01 I, :'''Id. en~' - , du!ocreJ lO"ing Oistricrs ta the~ deso-lbed P'<>perty" . ."!c oez.. lub Zon'n9 DI'kld for the lollowlng 1 THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NOiTHEAd·· I .: lYING EAST Of EASTERLY RIGHT:¿f~Z.E~ORTH 1/2 OfTHE NORTHWEST 1/4 W"'Y"'ND THE SOUTHwEST 1/4 Of- TH flORIDA SUNSHINE STATE PARK, THE fOllOWING, I,' NORTHEAST 1/4, EXCEPT THEREfROM fROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE sr ,¡.t'I,EST 1/4 Of THE NORTHEAST 1/4 RUN NORTH AlONGI"'WEST UN~OT . OUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTH_ EAST 1/4 42.50 FE . ·'E·OR"lEsS, NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NORTH ST. lUOE RI. :> ""N^dJ;,· .. '. 0:45 FOR POINT Of BEGINNING. THENCI,'CONTlNUE "'¡H,AlOt'/ß-SAI0',WI;STUNE A DISTANCE Of 46S.oo fEEi TO "'POINT. THENCE RUNWT PARAI,lHWlTH. THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH_ WEST 1/4 Of THE NORTHEAS1.1Y4;79"3.BO-fE1IT, THENCE RUN SOUTH PARAllEl WITH AFORfMENTIONE9,'WEsT UNE465.o0·fEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-Of_WAY r LINE Of SAID CANAl NO; 45; THENCE RUN WEST AlONG SAID NORTIi'RIGHT_OF_ WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 713,80 FEET TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING, FURTHER' EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 4250 fEET OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 Of THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE NORTH 41.00 fEET OF THE EAST 3/4 Of SAID SECTION 10. THE NORTH 39_50 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND THE EAST 4850 fEET Of THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID LANDS. All lYING IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3S SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST, ST. lUClE COUN_ TY, flORIDA. ¡ ALL THAT CflHAIN LANDS LYING IN ST. lUClE COUNTY, fLORIDA; LOCATED IN _ SEqlON '6. TOWNSHIP 3S SOUTH. RANGE 39EAST, SITUATED AND LYING EASI_ l ERLy'OF flO~IDA'S TURNPIKE (STATE ~OAD 911 AS PER SUNSHINE STATE PARKW",y RIGHT-OF_WAY MAP STATION 140+00 TO STATION 202+38.70. ST, LUCIE COUN_ TY, CONTRACT 7.1. SHEET 3 Of 5 AND BEING MORE PARTlCUlARl Y DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS, COMMENCE AT A WOODEN HU8 MARKING tHI CENTER Of SAID SECTION· I O. THENCE NORTH 00 15'41" EAST AlONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of SAID SECTiON, A DISTANCE Of 1,33321 fEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER Of THE SOUTH 1/2 Of THE NORTHWEST 1/4þf SEmON 10; THENCE NORTH 89 35'21· WEST AlONG THE NORTH LINE Of THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of SEClJON 10,'" DISTANCE OF 311.05 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 Of THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of SECTION 10. FO~APOINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 89 35'21· WEST AlONG·SA.ID NORTH LINE. A DISTANCE Of 954,07 fEET, TO A POINT ON THE EASTERlY RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE Of FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE (STATE RO"'D91). THENCE SOUTHH 33'00" EAST AlONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT'OF_WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF J.23B.8o..f.EfT, THENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT.Of,WA! NORTH B9 39'2T EAST.-l<DlSTANCf OF 15.42 FEET; THENC..e NORTH 00 15'17 EAST. '" OISTANÇE Of '95.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH B9 35'21 EAST,A DISTANCE OF 622_06 fEErm A POINT ON THE EAST LINE Of THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 Of THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 00 15"33" EAST, AlONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 500,00 fEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, TdGETHER WITH; RESERVING All RIGHTS Of INGRESS. EGRESS. LIGHT; AIR, AND VIEW BETWEEN THE A80VE DESCRI8ED PARCEl AND FlORIOA'S TURNPIKE (STATE ROAD 91} S""D PARCH CONTAINS 151.66 ACRES, MORE OR lESS. locotion: North side of Orange A~U&. approxjmat~y 1,800 feet eaSt of the FlOrida r urnpike. 3. John C"""II HIgh ScMoI fur a Change In· Zoning from tfoe RS-3 (R..identiol. SI~1e- famllr· - 3 dV/_eI Zoning Olslñctlo die 1 ~nsfiMlonaO Zoning DI'''id fe< tfoe folloWIng d..aibed í>r-'r- . THE ~r 105 FEET OF THE NORTH 316 FEET Of THE SOUTH 346 fEET Of THE SOUTHEAST ONe.QUARTER Of THE NORTHWEST ONE OOARTER OF THE SOUTH- WEST ONE-QUARTER Of SECTION B, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST Of THE PUBUC RECORDS OF ST!lUOE' COUNTY, FLORIDA. location, North side 01 DeIaworêAvenùõ;¡oPP'Oximalely 700 feet eo" 0/ He"""'n Rood_ .4. Timothy and Debra RoM Car Wash..!orCl Conditionat-USfI Permit for a car wash.f9a1ity In the CN (Cotni1>ercia~ NeighbomòoG¡ Zoning. DIstrict 1m the followingdeJcribed property: '. . ,; lOrs' 11 & 12. BLOCK 169. LAKEWOOD PARK, UNIT 12A, AS RECORDED IN PlAT. 800K II, PAGE 35, PUBLIC R~ORDS Of ST, LUCIE COUNTY. flORIDA i location, 53~1 SunshIne SloIe P~. I PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held "In Commls$ÌOn Chambet-s, Rogel' Poitras AnrH!llJ(,. 2300 Vìrginla Avenue. fort,Plerce" Florida on Nowmber1 5,200 '. beginning at 7:00 P.M_ or as soon tf1ereafter QI possible. '. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105. fforWa Sfatvtes. if a person decides to appeal any decision mode by a board. agericy. 0(- Commission with respect to any matter considered at 0 meeting at hearing.. he wilrneed a record of the prOCeedings,.ond. that, for ~ purposes, he may need' to ensure that 0 verbatim record of the pr-OCeedlngS IS made, which record includes the testimony Clnd evidance upon which the oppeal is to. be based. PlANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION S1.LUC/E COUNTY, flORIDA /S/ Stelan Motthe~ CHNRMIo,N Publish: November 1, 2001 2271 I 18 ''-' f £,... \" ...., il·-~~~·~~'i§I"~··~-e~liiì;;OI §j~I~I~1 ~I~ Sli ~~li~T:~I~I~~i~i~I'~il~r~l~'~~r~~~1 fd~~~l -'I - 10 O\.V"'I ~ (".11_ - M -I~ "º - M MI- N[o.......... ¿ 1O..q- ~ MIM MI\O N M M N NIMjM M ~IO '" MIV"'¡ 0 JI "-'1--' ,:" 'i' I >11"'-1' 1111'1" 'I' '-" I I,T,. ""'....!.".' '--11 - N -tnl--V)I-NII"'iIr---..............·o\lr"lV)N_~II')'V t--'V',V"'I...,IO'I~~MI..............V)V')'-nIl')OVV'lI.t')N_o: ~ QC O\¡oo 0 -.:t M ~ V.'o::t' 'V V~N ~ -.::ti~ 0 Ir¡ Vi....... V':I - ~ vlv V "It' C5 0 00 V V "'¢ V V "'¢ 0'\ V') V 'V 00""" 1£'11 ". ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ M ~i~ ~ ~i;;: ~1~jM ~ ~ ~ ~:g ~ ~i~[~ ~ M ~ ~:~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q\li :,MI"'I",!",¡",IM.MM!MLIMhMIMIMIMIM MIMI~!M IMIM!M'MIMMIMMMI"'MM""M,MIM MIM 8 M! I!~! . . . . ¡ , . . ' ., · ' " .. .., '.' . .. i..,:!.! .s¡,~,~~.~ ~I'~!~'~'~'~~'~'~~~~'~ ~:~I~,<i~'~'~'~'~'~'~~~:~'~~'~~I~I~'I~I'~¡~lb]~I :L~ p~! ~i tI..!~, ~ _~i_t1..J~L.~! ~_: tL_ju..r u..i u..:u..; tL;!u.. tL¡ tI.! ~iQu..! u..! u..¡ u..¡ r.L.:: LI..t u..j u..:u..! u..¡ u..! u..: u.~ u..LLt.jLt.~I.~L~¡c¿,~! i " :g - , 8: u "8: ~, ; ~: 0 b VI . v~ v, u, oi . v, u v:), E¡ : oi 0: 0, u:~· OJ U -Q¡ Ui U' U, U U Vi ,~: V' vlu~ 0' ~: ~.-g: ~i ~ I~! ~¡~: ~i ê.~. ~: ~i ~¡ O·>! : ~i ~.'}J ~¡ ~:7ii ~:j: B'~: 21~' ¡::. ~i è13! ~¡ ~i ~:-o ~ u: Uj,v. ;~¡U:U:V,o .4,):0 ""'coS·iU'U.,.C ¡ :UiV:Û'V'o,"'I:J'c;:¡ 'U'V.iU'U'V.V:·_, ,ul"'lu'-< 01 0:.. ''''''''''''',"1 "i""!""'i·~i""'i.·",.""."" ",.-""",..,.. U -, ",,,,,,..,..:,,,, ..,.....,.., "i.-" -''''''r,.ö:,."""""",U'.o:::I'''''i''''' "'" 0..,.. ¡;." . t:,u.. ,.... "·5'...·u..,0",..., ",......... 5'.. ....,...." '" ° ....,.........,....1.... "" """, u.. u.., ,....u..u.., 8' E'....,.... u..'.,.....1 ~..·~I g:~:~.~! ~i C;~·~i~¡~i S:~¡~ ~:= ~.~.~. §¡ ~~i~i~i~:~:~:~;~,~ ~'~¡~~'~I!~! ol~I'~it¡ $ ~ U,o,-o:o 0;"",<1,0 0.0,0;""00"','" °'°-""1'<".010,000,....'°.00.°'° 00 ..,,,,,'O.OIOJ~ 01 _¡U:~:í/.))L,j~:(.t.,.~~! ..J!.~~ f:Lo!~! L1..: ~i{J.,: LL,:.....Ji (-: u...i(.t.,} OJ ooG..G'.u..! LL.¡ u...!L1..¡ {J." Xj f-;¡c...: L1.,' u..¡ i.I..j u.. í.t.i~i ~_~_!~!~'j ~i~~_~ _~_~_ ¡a 8 8 £ ~, ~ ~ . ~, í/.) ~ : ¡ ':: ~: :.:š: ..... '"g! z! , : : ; :t !V)I . "0. -0. -'. . 1>(' _, '¡,.,' , ! ; : :~: ¡~! ; . : Q::. cz:::! u:. co: u-~! ;:. Wi aJ!¿r :, ¡Û! j i i Ui ¡i ~!j:li!li~!¡I~~I¡I¡ ,8illill~188~1 ¡1:1¡¡!~¡im~J8¡~I~~iil~ili~'lii!1 i¡iJ:U" jtl¡!~,I¡!I~ii¡IJlililliinljl!il:8~11' ~ 11-0 ~ .0~1.;::;j':¡;¡. !.8.. '" \ë. "';;;; ~ ~I~.:", ;::;'0 8 ;:!;!'" ~. .&J ~. ~i.·&J g:. Õl;::¡i~'8..Ii;f.'- .~I:g ~ r;{ O. 'I"'."'. .~,., 0:!!5 IL< ~l.~iMJ~~JN~ Q\ V')~ M - 0'I~1~ ~J~ - ~~ _~~O\ ~_C?'~_~ ~ _~_:·U.~l~~~ -IN N -.:t _~¡O\_ N NI~ VI II¡i · · i i ¡ ! ' : : ' · , i . : , ; · I~ ,i ,...., i : · i · I .11 II i 'I I i I~l~ ,!~ L ji 'i: i, !o¡ 'f! :t~,1'11 h il~ll!jJ r~ =- 'I"'" w. . i ' I ; 1:1 ,.Q <') II ; I I ~¡ I ~:::I .. I ; ! ::1 'I I :!! Ü I ell i !] ¡ ë fI2 œl'! lð! I Q ~ I Zjl._.. --i--+---. L-i-j .... II I ... I I I !. I Iii ~ hili,! IZi I~ I J~~¡~I::EI¡~ìbl ! i~ il~'L !~!l~1 i"~~Wj~lJl ¡~ G.I '! !:. i..:. ~ ; oj ! ¡ , ' , ill ~. J ::' If~1 I 'I :i I I' Q -- I~ I I ¡ i'<ll( I II 1<1 I I lõi ~ II il I-!!Ii I 'I I ,I... I I I:~ I, I ~.. Ii II IJgI I g¡ , gliE1 I i I I ' ,e 'i I í=o' Q oS I I,..! /111;' , . 1 ,:; ¡.... I I'! "b :: ~ "': :-. ~ 'I ¡ c ....1 = t 'I ::I ~I I ' . l!:f ¡ -- 8 8 :a 9 1....1 ,gI8~'~ 0 Ie el '~I~IO~I ¡ , i~'~~II~ i ' ! I~I~I I¡:¡~ I::: ~'ã ",e § ê 9 I j ¡I~I~ i¡~ i ~j~i11'ill ~'~i¡li j' ~¡ ~~¡I~ '~J t ~1~1~~~ljl:~¡ §1~li] ~lljl~~ j ~.; ~ t~ eN! t<..o 9~JZL¡¡¡.~ > ~ ""I:r:¡:r: ~I~,o..l> "='I~+~CZ¡ "! 0.. .... º ~i<Q- en u...+" ~ o..:r: '" ~o.. N ¡.... Q <Q '" <Q U 8 ~ 11 ¡ I I r I I I I' I I I I I ¡ i I I I I IH !~ m!! l!i.-..li.'.!I.IIIII!li~m!UII!nilni..1¡~nnmUU ·1" t:.5 1 Q I::: ;;: :::1:: '" " " " "I" ~I..... ..... ,., M 11" ~ ....i~ - ~ - ..... - - 0 0 0 0 0 0000..... ..... ° ¡! ~ II~II~ ~I¡ ~ ~ ~ ~!~¡~ ~!~ ~ ~ ª ~I~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 ~ g g ~I u=,=~~__==,.., .....,.....,!" ....J~!:"':'I~..........::::¡.......... .....~.....l.......... .....,............... "'..............................::::¡::::¡...................., ..... ... ° ~ ~ I I' ~ ~ 'f § I '" g. en, I.: ~ "~ = li·O Ii Ë ~ lieS ~ I! c: ì: il- = ,<.I ,'- e ¡'ä. - !!~ ,r ë lit.:) '" ,I' "0 i:... ~ d¡ ~ 'E .. I¡:¡. ~ I Q Q !I~ ¡:,:: ! ~ s.. !iQ .: II ¡;¡." \C ¡I... 1"""1: il"a 9 II~ ~ 'I Q ¡:,:: i u .. l'ë wS Jë !l '. '" ..¡ ,I E CI) '11: .: I'!,::: II'" " uQ ~ '-' ( ...., {'" rO~---i~ j--~O:-§~II~!'~llíf~!~I~III~ ~I~ ~I~II~~II !: Ñ ~,~ ð ~ ~ -g.:~Ig, '3. a.1~ ~1'3. ~ 'g,1"1 ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~I~:~!~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ !IM¡M;MIM:M:OIMM!M:M M ~ MiM!M Mi: ~" . ' '1 ~''''''¡;'''''¡¡o<'''''¡'''''¡I~z ""'¡""'¡''''''¡,'''''¡,..J ..J..J.,....¡,,....¡.',....¡¡; --.l'I_f.L..t~i_í.I:o!u...: {.I..:~u..:Lt.:u..:u..:r.Ld.L,!u... tI.; -" " ~ ~i êl~j~j ~ ~: ê¡ ê! ~- ~;~, ê,~: 8¡~; o:~: v:~' V _ U v'o: 00 u: 00: V,V ,i ;.,¡P;:¡;:i~i 8¡¡;:'~i¡;:¡;:,¡¡;I¡;:,¡;:,¡;:I¡;:i¡;::¡;:I¡;:, . ..., 1::, 1::¡ OJ 0 1::, ::1.1::, 1:: 1::.1::.1:: 1:: 1::' 1::' 1::' 1::, :1.r"..I.1 .0..1 O'':;:.iuo. ..0.. - tal 0. ,..0. : 0: 0; 0 0'.0·,0.: 0. !. o!~ 'I~ ¡1_u...¡t.t.I-.,_ _Ç,L. :0..: ¡,¡",u.: L1.,! u..:tL. LL,;11..,: u..:u...~ u..,: Ii I, Ii t !I I' 'I I' N ... ° N " "" ~ I ¡ ¡! ,I ii Ii I j i I ! ,~I :1 ~~I i ¡ , : I : : " I.... "" 11 g ~ 1"'1"" '"' : I"'~I leu'" Cod OJ 01 ' " I " , e oS "1'-1 "'I ~ g '8 "'I'" " ~I ~ ~ "' 01 '8 ¡j, ª ê, ~ '''I~I~ ~~I~~I~ ~!~ ~II 1:Z = ð <t ='0.. .3r"';"'_tlIl--lJJ~O;;:9:Q,9+-9_9~1 II I~ ~i"'ill~!il~l~ ~i~ ~i~'~i~'~11 I,., )I¡~SZ: sz: ----1-1--'--11 I è5ðè:S ð 0000001001001 i == ,§ § § §:§ § §,§ § § § § §I§'§ §, I~II~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~§jR~~RRI~ ~ ~.~~ ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: '-' ..." Agenda Request Item Number Date: 15-& Jan 15, 2002 Consent Regular Public Presentation Leg, [ X ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ Board of County Commissioners Community Development Consider Draft Ordinance 02-004 amending the St Lucie County Lan Development ode by amending Section 3.01.03(0){7), Commercial Neighborhood. Conditional , to add New Par raph F that would provide for the Establishment and Operation of Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages a an Accessory Use to a Restaurant and! or Civic, Social and Fraternal Organization) as a Conditional Use, Draft Ordinance 02,004 proposes to amend Section 3,01.03(0)(7) of the St Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for the establishment and operation of "drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and! or civic, social and fratemal organization)" as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning district The proposed amendment to the St Lucie County Land Development Code has been submitted by Mr. William Morales, regarding property in the Lakewood Park area of the unincorporated County. Currently the sale of alcoholic beverages in the CN zoning district is limited to two types of uses, and only under very strict circumstances. Section 3,01.03(0)(7)(d){2) of the County's Land Development Code, provides that a business engaged in the retail sale of food products may also sell undistilled alcoholic beverages, There is a specnic notation in the last part of this section that prohibits the sale of liquor products. Section 3.01,03(0){8){a) of the County's Land Development Code, provides that a business, permitted as an eating establishment under the l.I¡nd Development Code, may also sell undistilled alcoholic beverages, but only as an accessory use to the eating establishment. While there is not a specific a notation to the sale of liquor products as there use outlined above, the term "undistillecf' has been relied upon by the County to limit the sale of alcoholic beverages to essentially beer and wine only. The above limitations were first added to the CN Zoning District when the district Itself was created as part of the general zoning te::! revisions approved by the County in 1984. During the discussion on the establishment of this new zoning district there were specific actions taken to limit the sales of distilled sprits in this zoning district, The general consensus of a number of community interest groups and the Board of County Commissioners at that time was that it was not appropriate to permit the sale of this type of alcoholic beverage in areas that were to meet the intent of the CN zoning district. At the December 14, 2001 review of this petition by the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency, and by a unanimous vote of the members present, the Planning and Zoning Commission! local Planning Agency voted to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners ;not approve Draft Ordinance 02-004, Staff recommends that the Board Of County Commissioners not approve Draft Ordinance 02-004, which proposes to amend Section 3.01,03(0){7) of the St Lucie County land Development Code to provide for the establishment and operation of "drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and! or civic, social and fraternal organization)" as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning district. Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: .' D ex] COMMISSION ACTION: APPROVED D DENIED OTHER No County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND608a) '-'- ....,¡ COMMISSION REVIEW: January 15. 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Interim Community Development Director DATE: January 9, 2002 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 02-024, approving the request of Community Savanna Club Joint Venture, for a Major Adjustment to an existing Planned Unit Development Site Plan (Savanna Club) for the project known as Savanna Club Phase V. (File No.: SPMJ-01-005) LOCATION: Northwest corner of Bromeliad Circle and Savanna Club Boulevard EXISTING ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development) LAND USE DESIGNATION: RU (Residential Urban) PARCEL SIZE: Overall Area of Adjustment 782.57 acres 60.42 acres PROPOSED USE: Savanna Club DRI a 2,350 lot adult manufactured home community. Phase V is a 228-unit phase of the overall adult manufactured home community plus an 11,849 square foot clubhouse PROJECT DENSITY: DRI approved units for Phase V Proposed number of units for Phase 229 228 SURROUNDING LAND USE: To the North is Phase 9 of Savanna Club DRI, to the south is Phase 4 of the Savanna Club DRI, to the east is Phase 10 of the Savanna Club DRI, and to the west is Phase 8 of the Savanna Club DRI . The future land use designation for the surrounding properties is RU (Residential, Urban). SURROUNDING ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development) to the north, south and east and RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family 5 du/acre) to the west. January 9, 2002 Page 2 '-" ""'" Subject: Savanna Club Phase V - Major Adj 10 an Exisilng PUD SPMJ-01-005 FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station Number #12 (1755 Village Green Drive), is located approximately 2 miles away UTILITY SERVICE: To be provided by the City of Port St. Lucie Utilities Department. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS: Right of Way Adequacy: See Comments Scheduled Area Improvements: See Comments TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity *******************************.*******.**** STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SETFORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03 ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the official Zoning Atlas, the Board of County Commissioners shall consider and make the following determinations: A. Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed amendment is not in conflict with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Phase V of the Savanna Club PUD is located in the Savanna Club DRI, at the northwest corner of Bromeliad Circle and Savanna Club Boulevard. The Savanna Club, DRI received its original approval on April 27, 1982. On July 1, 1984, this Board approved the Preliminary PUD site plan for the Savanna Club development. This approval was for 2,394 adult manufactured home lots. A revised Preliminary Development Plan for the Savanna Club PUD was approved by the County Commission on December 3, 1985. This purpose of this revision was to reduce the, number of manufactured home lots from 2,394 to 2,350 manufactured home lots. Condition 13 of the Development Order for the Savanna Club DRI states the following: .' " ''The applicant shall provide such additional public shelter spaces for disaster preparedness in the Port St. Lucie area that will be dedicated for the use of Savanna Club residents and their guests and relatives and will be adequate to handle the needs generated by this Development. Such needs are found to be and shall be determined pursuant to the following criteria or standards: a) 75% of the population of this Development are assumed to be year round residents (Le" present during hurricane season); b) 1 00% of the year round residents will be evacuated during January 9, 2002 Page 3 '-' Subject: Savanna Club Phase V - Major A~an Exisitng PUD SPMJ-01-005 hurricanes; c) 40% of those persons evacuating would go to public shelters; d) a minimum of 40 square feet per person (Le., shelter space) shall be provided by the applicant. The shelter space shall be provided on-site or off-site based on the above criteria and shall be located, equipped and stocked with provisions in accordance with requirements of St. Lucie County based on recommendation of the County Disaster Preparedness Director. All spaces shall be designated and accepted by the St. Lucie County Department of Disaster Preparedness, subject to approval of St. Lucie County according to the following schedule: 1. One-third of the shelter spaces (20,000) square feet to be provided on or before June 28, 1998; 2. Two-thirds of shelter space (additional 20,000 square feet) to be provided at the time of energizing of one-half (1,300) of the total units; and, 3. The balance of the shelter spaces (additional 21,440 square feet) to be provided at the energizing of three-fourths (1,950) of the total units. For the purpose of determining when each portion of the hurricane shelter must be provided, a residential unit will be deemed energized when a building permit is issued for the construction of that unit on a platted-lot in the Savanna Club Development." The Savanna Club Development currently contracts with Port St. Lucie Lanes to provide the shelter space for the 1 slone-third of the project units. This facility provides for a total of 36,204 square feet of usable shelter space. Utilizing a ratio of 40 square feet of shelter space for each energized unit, a total of 1,176 units can be safely housed within the facility. As the above condition states, prior to the 1 ,300 unit being energized a total of 40,000 square feet of shelter space is required to be provided. An additional 3,796 square feet of shelter space is required to be provided at the time that the 1,300th unit is energized. According to the St. Lucie County Building Department, 1,249 units have been issued building permits. . , In this petition, the applicant is proposing to construct an 11,849 square foot clubhouse, of which 9,000 square feet will be utilized for shelter space. Combining the existing space of 36,204 square feet with the proposed 9,000 square feet, the applicant will have provided 45,204 square feet of shelter space. Therefore, the applicant'will have meet the second part of Condition 13. B. Whether the proposed amendment Is consistent withal! elements of the St, Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; '-" """'" Subject: Savanna Club Phase V - Major Adj to an Exisitng PUD SPMJ-01-005 January 9, 2002 Page 4 The proposed Savanna Club PUD is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. Policy 1 .1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes a maximum density for the RU (Residential Urban) land use category as 5 du/acre. The overall gross density is 3.00 du/acre, which is consistent with this policy. Policy 1.1.5.10 of the 8t. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states, ".. .construction of new residential development at densities greater than two units per acre shall only be permitted when central or on-site wastewater systems are available or will be provided concurrent with the impacts of development, consistent with the adopted levels of service found in the plan." The proposed project will be serviced water and sewer services from the City of Port St. Lucie Utilities. The applicant has provided a letter of service availability, which indicates that sufficient capacity is available to support the proposed project. The proposed project is consistent with this policy. Policy 1.1.7.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states, "...permit and encourage innovative land use development patterns including Planned Unit Developments and Mixed Use Developments." The proposed development is part of the overall Savanna Club PUD development and therefore is consistent with this policy. C. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; This amendment to the existing PUD is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general character of the area is residential. The proposed residential development adjoins existing residential sub-parcels: Phase IV (80% developed) and undeveloped Phases 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the Savanna Club PUD. The original Savanna Club PUD proposed 10 phases of development. The developer has actively been developing. The original PUD Phasing Plan indicates that the developer proposed Phase V to contain 229 units. The submitted Final Development Plan for Phase V of the Savanna Club PUD is consistent with the previously approved Preliminary Development Plan for the area. . D. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; The requested planned unit development amendment is consistent with the original Preliminary Site Development Plans approved in 1982, and later revised in 1985. The applicant is proposing to modify the phasing plan for Phase V by incorporating the aréa proposed for the clubhouse, which was previously found in Phase 9 into Phase V. E. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit and emergency medical facilities. '-" ..., Subject: Savanna Club Phase V - Major Adj to an Exisitng PUD SPMJ-01-005 January 9, 2002 Page 5 The proposed development is to be served by the Port St. Lucie Utilities Department. Savanna Club Phase V is part of the Savanna Club a Development of Regional Impact. The Final Development Order for this project identifies the necessary community infrastructure improvements that are to be completed as Savanna Club develops. Through the monitoring and enforcement of the requirements of this Development Order, adequate public services are being provided for. At the time, that the Savanna Club DRI was processed, all roadway impacts for development were determined. The developer's site plan indicates the construction of a future access onto Lennard Road just north of the Phase V project boundaries. This access location is consistent with what is shown on the project site plan amended in 1985. The applicant is proposing an 11,849 square foot clubhouse of which 9,000 square feet will be utilized for shelter space. The applicant has indicated that in the future, the clubhouse will be turned over to the Savanna Club Property Owners Association. They have further indicated that the clubhouse will be part of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, in regards to the use and maintenance of the new facility. The applicant indicated that the clubhouse onsite shelter facility will be used by those Savanna Club residents having a registered ambulatory handicap and all other residents being referred to the alternative shelter. F. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed PUD amendment is not anticipated to create significant adverse impacts on the natural environment. The submitted site plan has been determined to be compliant with the applicable requirements of the Final Development Order for the Savanna Club a Development of Regional Impact. G. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would adversely effect the property values in the area. It is not anticipated that the approval of this Final Planned Unit Development will have any negative impact on the value of this property or on any of the adjacent properties in this area. The surrounding area is already developed in a manner similar to what is proposed with this development application. . . H. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns. . This proposed change in zoning will provide for a continued orderly development pattern for this area. I. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code. ~ ~ Subject: Savanna Club Phase V - Major Adj 10 an Exisilng PUD SPMJ-01-005 January 9, 2002 Page 6 The proposed amendment has been determined not to conflict with the public interest and the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS Community Savanna Club Joint Venture, the developer of the Development of Regional Impact known as Savanna Club is requesting a major adjustment to an existing Planned Unit Development for the construction of 228-units of adult manufactured homes to be known as Savanna Club Phase V. Savanna Club Phase V, is part of the Savanna Club, a Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The Savanna Club DRI is approved for a total of 2,350 doublewide manufactured home community. As of this date, approximately 1,249 manufactured home units have been permitted for construction. The total project area of the Savanna Club DRI is approximately 783 acres. The approved gross development density of the Savanna Club DRI, which this parcel is part of and which the County recognizes as the controlling density reference for this development, is 3.00 units to the acre. Attached for your review is Draft Resolution 02-024. This Resolution, if approved, would grant approval to the submitted Major Adjustment to an Existing Planned Unit Development Site Plan for the Savanna Club. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-024, subject to the following conditions: 1. No access gates or restrictive entrances shall be permitted to be installed along Bromeliad Circle or any other interior roadway within the project, without the specific authorization of the Board of County Commissioners following a duly noticed public hearing consistent with the provisions of Section 11.02.05(F) of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code. 2. The new clubhouse approved as part of the Major Adjustment to an Existing Planned Unit Development shall be required to house as, indicated by the applicant filings, those Savanna Club residents, which have a registered ambulatory handicap, in the event of a hurricane or other similar emergency. 3. No additional internal ground signage shall be permitted within this project. If you have any questions, please let us know. ICP Development Director DJM/cs H:lwp/projects/Savanna CI bISavanna Club Phase V/agendalbccmemoJnl cc: Richard Ladyko, Culpepper & Terpening, Ine, Joseph Gaynor "'" ..., RESOLUTION 02-024 FILE NO.: MJSP-01-005 A RESOLUTION GRANTING MAJOR ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL TO THE EXISTING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS SAVANNA CLUB FOR THE AREA REFERRED TO AS SAVANNA CLUB PHASE V WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff r has made the following determinations: 2. On April 27 , 1982, b the Development of for a Major Adjustment to an e development of Phase V of 49 square foot clubhouse. 1. granted Development Order approval to n as Savanna Club. 3. On November 2, 1 Development appro esolution 82-151, this Board granted preliminary Planned Unit o the Planned Unit Development known as Savanna Club. 4. On July 1, 1984, by Ordinance 84-09, this Board granted Final Planned Unit Development approval to the Planned Unit Development known as Savanna Club. 5. On December 3, 1985, after holding a public hearing, of which a notice of such hearing was published in the F1. Pierce Tribune and the Port S1. Lucie News, and after notifying by mail all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property, this Board. through' Resolution 85-248, this Board granted a major adjustment to the existing Planned Unit Development known as Savanna Club. 6. On December 18, 1990, after holding a public hearing, of which a notice of such hearing was published in the F1. Pierce Tribune and the Port S1. Lucie News, and after notifying by mail all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property, this Board, through Resolution 90-338, this Board granted a major adjustment to the existing Planned Unit Development known as Savanna Club. File No.: SPMJ-{)1-{)()5 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-024 Page 1 "- .."",¡ 7. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet all technical requirements and to be consistent with the future land use maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 8. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 9. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. 10. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. 11. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 13. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy Community Development Dir solution, was granted by the 12. The proposed project will be served byadequat NOW, THEREFORE, BE County, Florida: e oard of County Commissioners of St. Lucie A. Pursuant to Section .05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project to be known as Savanna Club Phase V, is hereby approved as depicted on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Culpepper & Terpening, Inc., dated 2/12/01 and revised on 9/28/01, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Director on 1/09/02, for the property described in Section 8, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. No access gates or restrictive entrances shall be permitted to be installed alol)g Bromeliad Circle or any other interior roadway within the project, without the specific authorization of the Board of County Commissioners following a duly noticed public hearing consistent with the provisions of Section 11.02.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 2. The new clubhouse approved as part of the Major Adjustment to an ExistingPlanned Unit Development shall be required to house as, indicated by the applicant filings, those Savanna Club residents, which have a registered ambulatory handicap, in the event of a hurricane or other similar emergency. 3. No additional internal ground signage shall be permitted within this project. File No.: SPMJ-{)I-Q05 Resolution 02.Q24 January IS, 2002 Page 2 \.- ..., B. The property on which this Major Adjustment to an Existing Planned Unit Development Plan approval is being granted is described as follows: Being a portion of Parcels 4,5 and 8, according to SAVANNA CLUB PLAT NO. FOUR, as recorded In Plat Book 30, Page 15, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Southwest corner of aforesaid Parcel 4; thence N 00°05'25" E, along the West boundary of said Parcel 4, a distance of 170.04 feet; thence continue N 00°07'27" E, along the said West boundary of Parcel 4 and Parcel 8, a distance of 1,414.06 feet; thence S 89°52'05" E a distance of 1,743.18 feet; thence N 00°07'55" E a distance of 75.00 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve a distance of 39.27 feet through a central angle of 90°00'00" to the point of cusp; thence S 89°52'05" E a distance of 165.00 feet, to the East boundary of aforesaid Parcel 5; thence along the easterly and southerly boundaries of said Parcel 5, by the following courses and distances: Thence S 00°07'55" W a dIstance of 686.83 feet; thence S 45°07'55" W a distance of 300.23 feet; thence S 44°52'05" E a distance of 542.07 fee e S 45°07'55" Wa distance of 240.00 feet; thence N 44°52'05"W a dis .07 feet; thence N 45 °07'55" E a distance of 120.00 feet; thence S 44 ance of 60.00 feet to the intersect/on wIth a non-tangent curve v st, having a radius of 45.00 feet, the cord of which bears E, asterly along the arc of said curve, a distance of 22. 8°27'30"; to the point of reverse curvature . hwest, vlng a radIus of 25.00 feet; thence northe a distance of 23.24 feet, through a central angle of 53 e curvature with a curve concave to the southeast, havln t, the chord of which bears N 24°16'08" E; thence northeasterl f saId curve a dIstance of 15.15 feet, through a central angle of 07° ence N 44 °52'05" W, non-tangent to last described curve, a distance of 104.7 t; thence N 45°07'55" E a distance of 82.00 feet to the intersection with a non-tangent curve concave to the southwest, having a radIus of 180.00 feet, the chord of whIch bears N 65°34'23" W; thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve, a distance of 130.09 feet through a central angle of 41°24'35"; to the point of reverse curvature with a curve concave to the northeast, havIng a radius of 220.00 feet; thence northwesterly along the arc of saId curve a distance of 159.00 feet, through a central angle of 41°24'35"; thence N 44 °52'05" W a dIstance of 36.45 feet; thence S 45°07'55" W a distance of 100.00 feet to a point In the Easterly boundary of said Parcel 4; thence along the Easterly and Southerly boundaries of said Parcel 4, by the following courses and dIstances: Thence continue S 45°07'55" W a distance of 84.00 feet to the intersect/on with a non- tangent curve concave to the west, having a radius of 45.00 feet, the chord of which " bears S 00°45'11" W; thence southerly along the arc of said curve, a distance of 129.58 feet through a central angle of 164°59'15"; thence S 00°07'55" W, non-tangêÍ1t to the last described curve, distance of 34.26 feet; thence S 44°52'07" E a distance of 89.37 feet; thence S 45°07'55" W a distance of 68.00 feet; thence S 44°52'05" E a distance of 32.00 feet; thence S 45°07'55" W a distance of 100.60 feet tòthe Intersection with a non-tangent curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 120.00 feet, the chord of which bears S 25°13'29" E; thence southeasterly along the arc of said curve, a File No.. SPMJ-01-Q05 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-024 Page 3 \..- ....,¡ distance of 58.24 feet through a central angle of 27°48'35"; thence S 44°52'05" E, non- tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 153.68 feet; thence S 45 °07'55" Wa distance of 100.00 feet; thence S 44°52'05" E a distance of 100.00 feet; thence N 45 °07'55" E, non-tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 153.68 feet; thence S 45°07'55" E a distance of 100 feet; thence S 44°52'05" E a distance of 681.76 feet; thence S 04°52'05" E a distance of 403.38 feet; thence S 85°07'55" W a distance of 240.00 feet; thence N 04 °52'05" W a distance of 305.11 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 30.00 feet; thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve a distance of 20.94 feet through a central angle of 40°00'00"; thence N 44°52'05" W a distance of 583.49 feet; thence N 45°07'55" E a distance of 100.00 feet; thence N 44°52'05" W a distance of 100 feet; thence S 45°07'55" W a distance of 215.87 feet; thence N 89°51'50" W a distance of 2.68 feet; thence S 00°08'10" W a distance of 240.00 feet; thence N 89°51 '50" W a distance of 946.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 60.42 acres, more or less. (Tax ID Is: 3425-704-0008-000/1, 3425-704-0011-000/5, and 3425-704-0007-000/4). (Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of Brom Club Boulevard) ircle and Savanna C. The approvals and authorizations grante building permits on this property a e effective for the remaining v r' Impact (DRI). for the purpose of obtaining er the resolution shall remain b Development of Regional D. The Major Adjustme nit Development approval granted under this Resolution is speci the requirement that the petitioner, Community Savanna Club, Joint ,ding any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permi construction authorizations form the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to: the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property desbribed in Part 8. E. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on January 15, 2002, which certificate shall ~emain valid for the period of Site Plan approval. Should the Site Plan approval granted by thi.s resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. F. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A which plan shall be placed on file with the S1. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: File No.: SPMJ-Q1-OOS January 15. 2002 Resolution 02-024 Page 4 \.0- -r Chairman Doug Coward xxx Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes xxx Commissioner Paula Lewis xxx Commissioner John Bruhn xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: BY DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY cs: H:\WP\Projects\Savanna Club\Savanna Club Phase V\Agenda\02024.res.doc File No.: SPMJ-Q1-Q05 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-024 Page 5 · ' " '-' >."",ì My name is Dr. Dolores A. Morgan, I have been a resident of the Savanna Club since 1989 but a property owner in St. Lucie since 1980. I am currently a member of the Board of Directors of the SCPOA but I am speaking as a resident.. The residents in the first 3 phases of the Savanna Club bought in a community which sold its land. When the current developer came in he changed that and is now leasing the land. This was a major change we as residents had no voice in. The Board of Directors at the time negotiated a settlement agreement with the developer who went bankrupt and that was a part of the settlement, the membership of the Savanna Club Property Owners Association did not have a vote in this important decision. Currently there are 950 homes in the first three phases and the recreational facilities and parking have been adequate for that number. We are pennitted 200 people in our clubhouse for social and business activities. The developer has closed on 213 homes in phase 4 and we are not certain how many more he has pennits for in that phase since he has not communicated these important points to us. He is currently asking for over 200 more homes in phase 5 and will build a club house which will provide for activities for small groups but will not accomodate large numbers. We have attempted to accomodate the Phase 4 residents in our clubhouse activities but because of the numbers and the parking available this has created numerous problems. We have attempted to get the developer to hear our concerns but there has been little response. Parking must be a priority not only at the new clubhouse, but also at the existing one. There have been comments made by the developer of gating the community. Because of Lennard Road, this would cut off phase 1, those members of our community who have lived here the longest. We are also concerned it will divide our community even more than has already been done. We notice there is on the current request an exit in the future to Lennard road. We do not object to '-' -..I this but we sincerely hope it will not result in setting a precedent to gate the entire community. This we vehemently oppose. We currently have tennis courts which have been adequate for the resident population but will not accomodate increased numbers of people or cars. We do not know if additional courts are planned. We are currently trying to get the developer to solve problems in Phase 4 relating to drainage as well as problems on our golf course resulting from the work already begun on Phase 5 . We are told these will be resolved when Phase 5 is completed or when it suits the developer. This is not acceptable. The developer has the resources to make a 9 hole golf course into an 18 hole course in another of his communities but will not meet his reponsibilities in our community. We are asking our commissioners to protect those tax payers who have been in this community for years, who love The Savanna Club, who recognize the need for growth but who want to see it done right. I. Please require them to properly complete phase 4. 2. Please require them to keep us informed of their activities which affect the residents so we can inform them of what to expect. 3. Please look closely at the clubhouse they are proposing and the one we currently have and be certain there is adequate parking and other facilities for the numbers of people being brought in. 4. Please keep us informed of requests from the developer when they have implications for the tax paying residents already living here. 5. We realize we are a growing community, but request you keep the safety and quality of life of the residents uppennost in your minds when making decisions rather than making the influx · ~ ...,I of money your first priority. We make this request on behalf of all residents of St. Lucie County. \...f "" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ..L DATE: January 15, 2001 "Investment for the Future" REGULAR [x] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 PRESENTED BY: ~1;,~ County Engineer SUBJECT: S. 25th Street-St. James Drive Landscaping Improvements (Airoso Boulevard - Midway Road) , BACKGROUND: In January of 1999, the S. 25th Street-St. James Drive Road Widening Project was completed. On July 20, 1999, the BOCC approved a work authorization with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc., to initiate landscaping design plans for the improved roadway. On January 23, 2001, the BOCC approved the conceptual-design provided by the architectural firm Houston Cuozzo Group. The landscaping plans have been completed, based upon a total required budget of $250,000. Funds in the amount of $209,696 are currently available in account no. 101006-4116-563000-4109 of which $149,696 are carryover funds from the previous fiscal year, and $60,000 are new monies allocated for fiscal year 2001-02. The BOCC also approved additional funding of $100,000 from the General Fund reserves during the Capital Workshop held August 13, 2001. These funds are available in accourit no. 101003-4113-599330-400. Engineering staff is requesting Board approval of the final design and permission to advertise for bids, with the understanding that we will proceed with construction of all of the improvements at this time. The County has been contacted by the St. Lucie North Homeowners Association about the possibility of developing an "Adopt-A- Tree" Program along the S. 25th Street-St. James Drive corridor. They have previously expressed interested in providing donations and/or maintenance as part ofthe "Adopt-A- Tree" Program. This program is sponsored by the St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce and would have to be developed before any funding would be available to assist with construction of additional landscaping improvements and/or maintenance. The County will be responsible for maintenance of the improvements through our Road and Bridge Division of Public Works. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds in the amount of $209,696 are currently available in 101006-4116-563000-4109 of which $149,696 are carryover funds from the previous fiscal year and $60,000 are new monies allocated for fiscal year 2001-2002. The BOCC also approved additional funding of $100,000 from the General Fund reserves during the Capital Workshop held August 13, 2001. These funds are available in 101003-4113-599330-400 Trans Trust/Local Option. .< PREVIOUS ACTION: Dec. 16, 1997- Awarded construction contract to Dickerson Florida, Inc., for roadway widening. July 20, 1999 - Board approved preparation of landscaping design plans in the amount of $18,650.00. October 24, 2000 - approved final pay request to close project and approval of project budget for construction of landscaping improvements in the amount of $150,000. .~ ...,¡ January 23, 2001 - Board approved the conceptual design. December 18, 2001 - Board approved the consultant agreement with Houston Cuozzo for landscaping services for S. 25th S1. Phase II. . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of the landscaping final design and grant permission to advertise for construction of landscaping improvements for the S. 25th Street-St. James Drive Corridor in the amount of $250,000. COMMISSION ACTION: [~ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 4-1 (Bruhn) CE: MC~" """"., fr' [x)Originating Dept. Public Works 11' ~ s25landscapeadvertise,¡¡¡g , CoordlnatlonlSianaturH rr L [x)Mgt. & Budget .þJI \.,. i \\ (V~ Y) [X)Co.Eng~ [x)Revenue Coord. ~f¡r\ [X)ROad/Brid9~ ~ '-'" ,..¡ Agenda Request Item Number Date: 7 01/15/02 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [X] [ ] Quasi-JD [ ] SUBJECT:s Consider Draft Resolution 02-027 approving the request of Brandon Capital orporation for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan Approval for the project known as Sa ds, Lakeview _ Lakeshore and Amenity Site located on the west side of North SR A-1-A, dire tly south of the North Hutchinson Island Wastewater Treatment Facility in the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District and adjacent to the west right-of-way of North SR A-1-A. To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: Petition of Brandon Capital Corporation to consider Draft Resolution 02-027, which would grant a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan Approval for the project known as Sands, Lakeview - Lakeshore and Amenity Site to allow for the development of an 18-unit residential development consisting of 12 single-family units and 3 duplex units. (File No: MJSP-01-009) FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On May 13, 1980, the Board of County Commissioners granted approval for 498 units on 65.52 acres to be known as The Sands, Lakeview. The property, which is the subject of this approval was designated for a 9-story, 54-unit high-rise condominium. The proposed modification would reduce the density by 36 units, a reduction of 67 percent. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-027. County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: ...-- COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED D OTHER D DENIED 5-0 Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Purchasing: Other: '-' -' County Commission Review: January 15, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Administration Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Ass1. Community Development Director DATE: January 8, 2002 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 02-004 amending the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 3.01.03(0)(7), Commercial Neighborhood, Conditional Uses, to add New Paragraph F that would provide for the Establishment and Operation of Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages as an Accessory Use to a Restaurant and/ or Civic, Social and Fraternal Organization) as a Conditional Use. Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-004 which would propose to amend Section 3.01.03(0)(7) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for the establishment and operation of "drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and/ or civic, social and fraternal organization)" as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning district. The proposed amendment to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code has been submitted by Mr. William Morales, regarding property in the Lakewood Park area of the unincorporated County. While the particulars of the submitted petition appear to be focused and directed towards one particular business enterprise in the Lakewood Park area of the County, our review of the submitted amendment request is more global in nature. We must use a global type review since if approved, this Text Amendment would apply not only to the specific instances of Mr. Morales's property, but also all other areas of the County now zoned, or potentially zoned, under the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning designation in the future. In beginning our assessment of this proposed petition, we find that we must first review the purpose statement of the CN zoning district. This statement reads as follows: Q. CN COMMERCML,NBGHBORHOOD 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for limited retail trade and service activities covering a relatively small area and that is intended to serve the population living in surrounding neighborhoods. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may '-" ....¡ January 15, 2002 Page 2 Subject: Draft Ordinance 02-004 amending the Sl. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 3.01.03(0)(7), Commercial Neighborhood, Conditional Uses be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. Currently the sale of alcoholic beverages in the CN zoning district is limited to two types of uses, and only under very strict circumstances. · Section 3.01.03(O)(7)(d)(2) of the County's Land Development Code, provides that a business engaged in the retail sale of food products may also sell undistilled alcoholic beverages. There is a specific notation in the last part of this section that prohibits the sale of liquor products. · Section 3.01.03(O)(8)(a) of the County's Land Development Code, provides that a business, permitted as an eating establishment under the Land Development Code, may also sell undistilled alcoholic beverages, but only as an accessory use to the eating establishment. While there is not a specific a notation to the sale of liquor products as there use outlined above, the term "undistilled" has been relied upon by the County to limit the sale of alcoholic beverages to essentially beer and wine only. The above limitations were first added to the CN Zoning District when the district itself was created as part of the general zoning text revisions approved by the County in 1984. During the discussion on the establishment of this new zoning district there were specific actions taken to limit the sales of distilled sprits in this zoning district. The general consensus of a number of community interest groups and the Board of County Commissioners at that time was that it was not appropriate to permit the sale of this type of alcoholic beverage in areas that were to meet the intent of the CN zoning district. In reviewing the proposed text amendments to permit the sale of distilled alcoholic spirits, even as a conditional use, the applicant has failed to adequately demonstrate that such a change, when looked at in a global nature, would in fact not be in violation of the purpose statement of the CN zoning district. The applications focus on one particular business enterprise does not appear to be sufficient justification to change a rule of general application throughout the County. At the December 14, 2001 review of this petition by the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency, and by a unanimous vote of the members present, the Planning ànd Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency voted to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners not approve Draft Ordinance 02-004. Staff recommends that the Board Of County Commissioners not approve Draft' Ordinance 02- 004, which proposes to amend Section 3.01.03(0)(7) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for the establishment and operation of "drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and! or civic, social and fraternal organization)" as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning district. Staff further notes that should the petitioners wish to seek the option to sell alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and! or civic, social and fraternal organization at the location referenced in this application, then perhaps the more appropriate route to take would be to submit an '-" -I January 15, 2002 Page 3 Subject: Draft Ordinance 02-004 amending the St Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 3,01,03(Q)(7), Commercial Neighborhood, Conditional Uses application for change in Land Use and Zoning to Commercial General for their property. If such a designation were approved, then the sale of alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and! or civic, social and fraternal organization would be use open to them. SUBMITTED: DJM/ OR_02-004_MEM02(h) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager William Morales 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 " '-" ....." ORDINANCE NO. 02-004 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 3.01.03(Q)(7), COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, CONDITIONAL USES, TO ADD NEW PARAGRAPH F THAT WOULD PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF DRINKING PLACES (ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO A RESTAURANT AND/OR CIVIC,SOCIAL AND FRATERNAL ORGANIZATION) AS A CONDITIONAL USE, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; PROVIÐING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FORAN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION; AND PROVIDING FOR GODIFIGATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commis~ior'\ersofSt.Lucie CountY, Florida, has made the following determination: 1. On August 1, 1990, the'SoardøfCountyCommissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adøpted the $fÜLucie Cøunty Land Development Code. 2. The Board ofpq.~ntycom~i~~i()DrrSd'¡äs adopted certain amendments to the S1. Ll.Jciª'~unty Lan~¡(i)ªvelopment Code, through the following OrdinanceS: . . Ordinance #02-oo2a Draft #1 91-03 - 91-21 93-01 - 93-05 - 93-07 - 94-18 - 95-01 - 97-01 - 97-23 - 99-02 - 99-04 99-15 - fv1~t8~,~~,.1,991 NóVØm~ßri'l';1991 FebrûátY16, 1993 . ..' May 25;1993 Ftilfåy 25, 1993 August 16, 1994 January 10, 1995 March 4, 1997 September 2, 1997 April 6, 1999 August 17, 1999 July 20, 1999 91-09 - 92-17 - 93-03 - 93-06 - 94-07 - 94-21 - 96-10 - 97-09 - 99-01 - 99-03 - 99-05 99-16 May 14, 1991 June 2, 1992 February 16, 1993 May 25, 1993 June 22, 1994 August 16, 1'994 August 6, 1996 October 7, 1997 February 2, 1999 August 17, 1999 July 20, ·19\39 July 20, 1999 -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Ot, ikL TI" ougl , is for deletion Page 1 PRINT DATE 12/14/01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 '-' ...I 99-17 - 00-10 00-12 September 7, 1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 November 2, 1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 99-18 00-11 00-13 3. On , the Local Planning Agency/ Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance after publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at feast 10 days prior to the hearing and recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved. 4. On , this Board held its first public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in théPort St. Lucie News and the Tribune on 5. On , this Board held its second,public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after puølishing.a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and theßJ'!rjbuneOn 6. The proposed amendments to the'S1. Lucie:€ounty Land Development Code are consistentwith the g!9l1eral purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St~,Lucie Cty Comprehensive Plan and are in the best interest of t9~\I¡fealth and pul:îlic welfare of the citizens of S1. Lucie Coun1.¥~ F1!õtida. NOW, THEREFÐRE, BE1¡fi~J;il¡j~NED by the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. THE SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO READ AS FOLLOWS, INCLUDE: *******************************. -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Olrikc TI d O~gll is tor deletion Ordinance #02-ü02a Draft #1 Page 2 PRINT DATE: 12/14/01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 1 3.00.00 3.01.03 o. CN v ....I CHAPTER III ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS COMMERCIAL. NEIGHBORHOOD Paragraphs 1 through 6 - no change 7. Conditional Uses 1. b. c. d. e. L PART B. Car Washes (Self Service Only)..,,,!$Objecr~@aiJrovisions qfSection 7.10.22. (999) Day care - adult (8322) . . - child (8351) Postal services. (4311) .:/ .".' Retail trade:,¡fj,: (1) Gasoline seryj<;øs - acc~sì>Þry to retailfôod stores under SIC-5411. (999) (2) Undistilled'I:!IQÖholic b s acc~$Sory to retail sale of food. (5921 - E>cepl'Of liquOf) Telecommunicatiorí'otòwers - s~::standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) Drinkin P olie Be '8' an Accesso Use to a Restaurant and! or Civic Social anizati'8~'";!/' ******************************** CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in cðnftict with this ordinance ärehereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. Ordinance #02-002a Draft #1 -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Ot. ikG TI" 01:191 , is for deletion Page 3 PRINT DATE: 12/14101 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 '-'" ...I PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to anyperson, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property;or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENmøFrSmATE. The Clerk be and is hereby direct~dt~rthwith~,!!Všend a ~er1:ified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code aljl'd l.Laws,iepartmer;}t::of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. . . ~.'--.;. PART F. EFFECTIVEDAl1E. This ordinance shalltake effectußÖø'filing with the Department of State. PART G~ ADOPTION~ After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward xxx Vice Chairman Cliff Barnes xxx -------------------------------- Under1ine is for addition Otlik¿ TI" O~91 , is for deletion Ordinance #Q2-002a Draft #1 Page 4 PRINT DATE 12114101 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ~~ 37 ~ ....¡ Commissioner Paula Lewis xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx PART H. CaDI FICA TION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie Land DevelopemntCode, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section" ,"article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that parts B through Hshallnotbe codified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this 18th.~d.ªYofDe¢@mber, 2001. BOARD OF ¢OUNTY COMMISSIONERS SiEfLUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: <iBY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY OJM 02·004a(IJ>dcod01 ·H -------------------------------- Underfine is for addition Gtril<o Througl , is for deletion Ordinance #02-OO2a DraH#1 Page 5 PRINT DATE: 12/14/01 OFFICE·USE ONLY: '-' ....,I . RECEIPT NO.: RECEIPT NO.: . SP NUMBER: ¡¡III} I - 00 ( RESOLUTION NUMBER: CERT. CAP. NO.: DA TE FILED: REVIEW FEE: CONCURRENCY FEE: - - -.. ."-_. ".' ---.. ST. LUCIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY OEVELOP¡-M~ 0 i.e..' n__M.._. 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE. ROOM 201 I r::ì [l.l if:, ~ FORT PIERCE. FL 34982·5652 ! [II ¡ - - 561,462·2822 i! ,.\ ¡ - i! ¡ i i OCT 2 3. i'.-.'''':' ! f2 ¡- .~¡ I' i I I -"'--.... -..... .... ....... - -- _---_0.-" CI....,. . _.' u·'\ilC! . .-.- . APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE TEXT OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTAL Please axnpIete the requested information and subnût all items 10 the 5l Luáe County Department of Community Development, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 201, Ft Pierce, Fl34982. All applications must be accompanied by the proper non-refundable application fee. For additional detaDs on the information nec;eSsary for a submission of a site plan adjustment, please refer to SecIioo 11.02.00, 5l Luáe County Land Development Code. For assistance in submilling the applicatipn. please contact the 5l Lucie County Depar1menl of Community Devefopment, Planning Division. . ('. REVIEW FEES TEXT AMENDMENT $ 800.00 Following notification that the application is complete, this petition will be scheduled for the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The Planning & Zoning Comniission meels on the third Thursday of each month. Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners is dependent upon scheduling before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Please allow a minimum of 90 to 120 days for completion of the public hearing process following the certification of this petition. Initial submissions shall include the following: 1) One (1) original of the completed zoning code text amendment application: Applicant's Name W·; 1 L~\r,^Mo ('o..l.t s Sql{í A)W~~ L""AI'( PSL FI. 3ì.1'1&3 (H)SE,\ -3'-jt..!- leì¡,/ C.Wj Sb I -(?D3-'1ìCf2 SG 1-803.'';QQCf J .' Applicant's Address Applicant's Phone -. - .- - - Applicant's Fax .- ALL APPLICATIONS FOR ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT MUST BE COMPLETED AND FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE 4:30 PM EACH BUSINESS DAY TO MEET APPLICABLE FILING DEADLINES. FOR AN APPLICATION SUBMISSION TO BE DETERMINED COMPLETE. ALL REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMISSION, ST. LUCIE COUNTY APPLICATION FOR ZONING TEXT AM 1-5 A-f\c }- ed . .. FEV 1/19'00 ,.,., l'HE FOLLOWING INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE IS VERY IMPORTANT IN DETERMINING THE OUTCOME OF YOUR ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT. IT IS REQUIRED BY SECTION 11.06.00, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE THAT APPROPRIATE FINDINGS BE MADE TO JUSTIFY A ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT, PLEASE USE ADDITIONAL PAGES, IF NECESSARY, TO JUSTIFY YOUR REQUEST. 1, Provide (he precise wordin~ 0f the proposed amendment to (he text of the St Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, . 2. Describe any changed conditions that would justify the proposed amendment 3. Describe why there is a need for the proposed amendment. 4. Describe whether or how the proposed amendment conforms to the 51. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 5. Provide a statement outfining the extent to which the proposed amendment: a. Is compatible with existing land uses: b. Affects the capacities of public facilities, including but not limited to transportation faCilities, sewage facilities, water '-sü¡Jplÿ"; pà'rks; ài'àiriãgé:-sèhõõrs;'añ<rem'ergèncy medicaHaciTitiës:'- . .' -" , , t , c, Affects the natural environment: ." ý {" ¡ ~ ~ ':i·I:·,·J,i .,..:j-~: ;.~ d. Will result in an orderly and logical development pattern: '-I ( ( ~ APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE TEXT OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE QUESTIONS 1 - 5 I. Provide the ,recise wording of the proposed amendment to the text of the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance. Under Commercial Neighborhood, Section 7. Conditional Uses: Add Subsection F, Drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and I or civic, social, and frateOlal organizations.) 2. Describe any changed conditions that would justify the proposed amendment. Population expansion as welI as changes in demographics justifies the proposed amendment. There is no other facility in the local area large enough to provide dining, entertainment., and adult social beverages. The proposed amendment is needed to provide alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant for adults who dine and have a beverage with their meals. It is not designed for such establishments as "liquor bar". 3. Describe why there is a need for the proposed amendment. Many senior patrons who do not desire to ftequent "liquor bars" have an alternative and availability to enjoy an alcoholic beverage with their meal in a wholesome environment. Due to the close proximity to the county line many potential patrons now travel to neighboring counties to attain this type of service. This results in lack of revenues for the county, business owner, employees, and the ability for the landlord to collect rents justified for the property taxes paid 4. Describe whether or how the proposed amendment conforms to the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment does not affect the 5t. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The Commercial Neighborhood Zoning will still serve the population living in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed property currently operates as a restaurant serving the local community with dining, entertainment, beer, and wine. The addition of mixed drinks with meals will simply augment business and ensure prosperity for the' business location, employees, and landlord. 5. Provide a statement outlining the extent to which the proposed amendment: a. Is compatible with existing land uses: .' The proposed property currently operates as a restaurant serving the local community with dining, entertainment, beer, and wine. The proposed amendment is compatible with current land uses under the current zoning. '-' f C" ...,¡ b. Affects the capacities of public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water sUPI))Y, parks, drainage, schools, and emergency medical facilities. The proposed property currently operates as a restaurant serving food, beer, and wIne. The proposed amendment will not af/ect the capabilities and capacities of public facilities. c. Affects the natural environment: The proposed amendment does not have any affect on the natural environment. The property currently operates as a restaurant servmg food, beer, and wine and would need no construction of change in site plan for the proposed change, d. Will result in an orderly and logical development pattern: The proposed amendment is a logical development pattern intended to serve the people ofloca1 communities. The amendment would allow eating establishments, with approval of the County Commissioners, to provide alcoholic beverages to patrons within the community. This would keep potential customers and revenues ûom traveling to neighboring counties to attain this type of service. Additional Information: Tim's Frosty Mug and Grill. located in Lake Wood Park, now employs 5 people ûom the immediate neighborhood. With the addition of alcoholic beverages as an accessoI)' .use to a restaurant, Tim's Frosty Mug and Grill will be able to maintain and possibly expand the current local employment Over the past 8 years this location being solely a restaurant has gone out of business 5 times. The addition of mixed drinks with meals will augment business and ensure prosperity for the business location; the people employed. and enable the landlord to obtain rents justified for the property taxes paid. The restaurant hours of operation are ûom 11 am to l2pm with the last meal served at 11 pm providing ample time for service. Tim's Frosty Mug and Grill is located more than lOOOft from any church or school and will provide a good wholesome environment for all who choose to enter. " v ( (" -' 5018 TPK Feeder Rd Ft. Pierce FI. 3495 I Parcel # 1J01-615-0205-000-2 Lakewood I)ark-Unit I2-A-BII( 178 Lots 10 and 11 (Map 13/(311) (Or 1248-0830 : 1278-2550) - ;, ¡r- ,01 J o o U' ! i i , -0 Þ.·, ~. Î ~ =0 -d lJ> r@ ',-" - ~ Þ.f.JAC.r>. DR. ¡-.¡ E f (' f·,O.OO' ...~L". . .-.__.~===~~=-~ GOOO' I I , Ii I: Ii II 'I I I ,¡ I, II II I ~ \. "10" ('0.00' D L--ì i L- "- ) , ~ .. Add;.\- ìONo.\ Þ4,r-.iN~ ~S'·O· \ .~ 0-0 õ o '10-0 0 " c-< 15'·0· -------- -.I - () ..0 .... -+-,-.+. rOI . -' I ç" ~ < ¡ .? 0, "--1 . i < w ,\ 1.[' . , " &,'-0 ~~- I , " ~O·O AS"!)" o I i I ! , , _ i oi _. I c:..1j 0' -0 (!J .J) UJ ù «: (C of <:) Z ~ c.:: «: ?- .. .. t·- , , "", ØA' L~~IE.cbUNTY ~ ~'þpÍ:>uCATION FOR ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT SPECIAL NOTICE ..." FEV 1/19/00 (PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BELOW) Submission of this application does not const;lute the granting of site plan approvaL All appropriate requirements must be met prior to this project being presented for approval to the appropriate authority, $L Lucie County reserves the right to request additional information to ensure a complete review of this property/project - . _0..."_ ........ _ _ _. -... :_-- . .....-.... -~- -.... "- '.... - ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Applicant Information (Property Developer) Name: Address: Phone: Fax' Property Owner Information Agent Information: Name: Address: Phone: Fax: This application will not be considered complete without the notarized signature of all orooertv owners of record which shall selVe as an acknowledgment of the submission of this application for site plan approval. The property owner's signature below shall also selVe as authorization for the above applicant or agent to act behalf of said prope owner.. Mailing Address: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Name (P.lp""p Print)" Phone: STATE OF F..QRIQA , COUNTY O~ ' "-1.>.0 , Q... The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~;;) M day of to(' \-ö he í . 20.b.L. by .J ~ \ \ ; Co. ~ t-i\ om \~ "'!- [.~\\~.--'*o t'llb\'o-..\e '.:> ,",,"\, \. who is personally known to me or who has produced'VR-; Iff' .'''- 1--1 "'~0S,,- as identification. ~' ~'~ . ~ ~I^^~"'" ~-r. ,\ ~ ~a re of NotaB ß . R\'wc\", ";C);\ \2-\\;b Type or Print Name of Notary NolalV Public Title ~t.. <6 \C\ ''1 '-\'-\ Commission Number (Seal) ~ BRINOA GAIl. BEUIO 11 .otary Publlç. SII" øt Atri4t . . My Comml$3lon Exp, Mardi ~f.2OtJ Commission ICC 8fg744 (FI) ~1J!ã!ÇE U§§~NLYy:,<" >&&JJW>'¡#~G .. ::;'Ï.<~_. Project Reviewer: DRC Review: Approval Date: Comments: .. ~ "" ....tI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dennis Murphy, Assistant Community Development Director DATE: January 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Minutes for Ordinance No. 02-004 Attached you will find the meeting minutes for Ordinance No. 02-004. They were inadvertently omitted from the packets that were delivered yesterday. Attachment(s) jð J110 Y f -~-:~-~-:---.--- ---------- ~.-.. L: C; I~~ U 'Ij¡ I,' , 0-__.. '.',. " ._________ L!' -~-- ..., i ; .' , JAN 1 1 2002 ! L, I L----.----___,_J ~? ~__ ','j orFîCE i _~A .. ~ ~ L~":T::!~U\t =- AGENDA ITEM 7: Ordinance No. 02-004 - Amendin2 CN. Conditional Uses ~... ,-, .,,;\\ Dennis Murphy. Interim Community Development Director, stated that Agenda Item # 7 is the petition of Mr. William Morales to amend the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 3.01.03(Q)(7), Commercial Neighborhood, Conditional Uses, to add a New Paragraph F that would provide for the Establishment and Operation of Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages as an Accessory Use to a Restaurant and/or Civic, Social and Fraternal Organization) as a Conditional Use. Mr. Merritt asked about the distance required for schools and churches. Mr. Murphy explained that is a state regulation. Mr., Hearn asked if was county policy to allow any citizen to be able to request a Land Development Code text change. Mr. Murphy explained that is correct and the petitioner is charged an application fee for the request. He continued that zoning text changes are usually initiated by the County, but over the years, a few people have come forward to request a zoning text change, in this manner. Mr. William Morales stated he is the current owner of "The Frosty Mug" on the Turnpike Feeder Road. This establishment would like to sell alcoholic beverages, excluding beer and wine, as an accessory use to their restaurant. He submitted an application for an alcohol beverage license and was told that the area in question was not designated with the appropriate zoning for the sale of alcoholic beverages. He further stated that before submitting his application, he discussed with Staff and the Board of County Commission members, his situation and the best method to alleviate the problem In meeting with Staff, it was determined that a rezoning of the property was inappropriate as the property is located in the middle of other CN properties and therefore a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning would be required. In Staff's determination this would be an inconsistent method as it would be spot zoning. The other option discussed was a textual change to the Land Development Code to allow the sell of alcoholic beverages as a Conditional Use. This would have the same affect as allowing each application to be submitted and obtain approvals on own merit. The existing restaurant patrons have indicated that they would like to enjoy a drink with their meals. Over the past few years a number of businesses have opened but are never able to make a go of it. Mr. Morales stated that in his opinion that the ability to sell alcoholic beverages would improve the ability for an establishment to stay open in the existing location. Mr. Jones asked if this is the best way for the petitioner to obtain his goals. Mr. Kelly stated that "yes it was". He also stated that it is difficult to separate needs on a particular parcel from the fact that we are changing in all CN districts with the County. Staff doesn't agree but it is the best situation for the applicant. Mr. Kelly stated that it is difficult to separate needs on a particular parcel to the fact that we are changing the allowable uses in all CN districts with the County. Then he can seek a conditioÌ\al. use permit through both boards. .' Chairman Matthes asked if this petition would set a precedent. Mr. K~lly stated that it would not. If approved, the conditional use would be available to all CN properly. The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board would still maintain control. To allow this change in CN zoning would have to have every establishment come before the Commission and the Board. Mr. Morales stated that the people could decide through notification, mail-outs, etc., whether or P & Z Meeting December 20, 2001 Page 15 " , '"" " l~ ..... r ..,-,';~ ~; ", .....I" (> ¡;¡':1\l ~5i~" :wIS!ZI u ZßN!NG < ,," " ' " . ¡c'H);"I"·/'L I-."<),C!:,i:::',,::,(·'.:·:~' (~~' :,' :'~u'JH not the sale of alcoholic beverages is okay for their area. The conditional use provià~š' tíîë~ mas't' safety for the use and allows the Board to look at each case on an individual basis. Mr. Trias asked if the code distinguishes between distilled and un-distilled alcohol. Mr. Murphy stated that beer is seen as less of an alcohol beverage. Mr. Grande stated that as he understands the County's position is that the sale of hard liquor is more in keeping with a bar atmosphere and by regulating the type distilled -vs.- un-distilled alcohol, the bar environment is eliminated as a use that supports the neighborhood (CN District) and keeps the use in the more intense general commercial areas (CG District). Mr. Lounds questioned if the material found in the application in support of the text change was from Staff or was it submitted by the applicant. Mr. Murphy explained it was from the applicant and a copy of his application was attached to show this. Mr. Lounds asked what the difference between distilled and un-distilled alcohol was, because he feels that most people can get just as drunk on beer as whiskey. He also questioned if every application in CN, if they have a conditional use permit, would have to be approved by the Board and why staff is recommending denial, other than the fact that it is a blanket conditional use. Mr. Murphy explained there is no direction from Board of County Commissioners to change the policy. Further, a blanket change to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages would not be an acceptable use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) District. Mr. Merritt asked Staff if this use would be appropriate for the PNRD District. Mr. Murphy responded in the negative, due to the uses being set by those uses allowed within a zoning district and the use is not permitted in this area. Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Tim Trefelner came forward stating that he currently operates the "Frosty Mug" restaurant on the TurnpikelFeeder Road and that he was in favor of the zoning text change as it gives all applicants the opportunity to apply and stand on their own merit. He further stated that there are two establishments within the area, which are selling hard liquor. Mr. Grande asked if the two other establishments in the area have hard liquor. Mr. Trefelner stated that one is located in the same shopping plaza as Winn Dixie and the other establishment is Habits. He stated that the Habits establishment is located in the CN Zoning District and they are suppose to sell food but actually don't. This establishment is not for families. Seeing no one else, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lounds asked if we approve if any other establishment that wishes to serve alcohoìïc, beverages would have to go before the Commission and the Board. Mr. Murphy adVised that if this petition were approved then yes they would be going before both boards. Chairman Matthes asked if beer / wine are an accessory in the CN Zoning District. Mr. Murphy advised yes. Mr. Grande asked if they were to approve this change, would they create a situation that would make it difficult to approve some and not others because of a precedence being set. Ms. Young stated that if a petition meets the technical requirements of the code and there is no valid reason for denying a Conditional Use then the Board would have to recommend approval of P & Z Meeting December 20, 2001 Page 16 ~ "-' ,- "" ~ -- ! -~. . ,,-', : . ~.<..; , . I:!+_ ".'\ i .,' r;'~ "..". - ~~ !\:ILl the petition. ; '~ :' .;.,., ..... ,.~ ,",:n;!JNG ;\],'\1. Chairman Matthes asked what process must be gone through to obtain a liquor license. Mr. Murphy stated that Mr. Morales could probably explain that better. Mr. Morales stated that the ATF has a long application and a building inspector process and the parameters of church I schools must be reviewed. He continued that it is a $30,000 - $70,000 license. Chairman Matthes asked if the licenses are limited per year. Mr. Lounds asked if there is any chance that an applicant can be approved and then not serve food. Mr. Murphy advised that would revoke the conditional use permit. Mr. Hearn stated that he feels the CN Zoning protects neighborhoods of the undue effect of these businesses. It would not impact the quality of life, but his concern is that we have zoning districts that will allow them to do what they want. Not in the best interest of the residences to allow the selling of alcoholic beverages in the CN Zoning, He stated during the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, the Comp Plan Study Group, recommended a new process whereby a petitioner could request a "Special Exception" to the zoning code to allow a use, which is not permitted. In his opinion, this petition is more suited for this procedure, but not an overall change to the Land Development Code. Mr. McCurdy stated that he agrees with Mr. Hearn and is sympathetic to the applicants needs, but feels this is not the proper way to handle this and that a special use condition or rezoning to CG may be a better approach. Mr, Grande stated he too agreed with Mr. McCurdy. Chairman Matthes stated that he has a problem with changing the zoning text to all of the CN zoning districts. He stated he doesn't see a difference between the selling of beer, wine or other distilled alcoholic beverages, ¡fused properly. Mr. Morales stated that he would have a liquor license and food and asked if there were any special assistance or other opportunities available to help make this happen for him. Mr. Merritt stated that after considering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, including staff comments, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners deny the application of Mr. William Morales for an amendment to Section 3.01.03(Q)(7) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for the establishment and operation of "drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and/or civic, social and fraternal organizations)" as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) Zoning District because alcohol sales do not protect the quality of life in single~family residential neighborhoods. Motion seconded by Mr. Grande. , . " Upon a roll call vote the motion passed with a vote of 6-2 (Mr. Jones and Mr. Lounds voting against) Chairman Matthes stated that he would like Staff to explore other opportunities for the applicant. Mr. Lounds stated that Habits Zone was a previously zoned, zoning change with non-conforming use. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Kelly if the proposed site would be eligible for a rezoning. Mr. Kelly P & Z Meeting December 20, 2001 Page 17 '. n !r~:¡: . f> '''''' ii'4L '~~ ';i_:i,.~"\ ~ "~;i1 _.;J 1;¡ Ii """ ~"<.,," v>;:::,:·_'-·~::; t , stated that it ìs a long-standìng polìcy of the county wìth shallow lots to not apply for CG zonìng to remain consìstent wìth Land Use dealìngs on corridor. .' P & Z Meeting December 20, 2001 Page 18 7r:,\'.I~NG ! ," _ " ,. 't ~. . -; ~ :j;:¡,\\llIl .. ~- ,:!~v ~ ¡'.~ "" ...",¡/ Commission Review: January 15, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planni ng Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Assistant Community Development Director DATE: January 9, 2002 SUBJECT: Petition of Brandon Capital Corporation for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan Approval for the project known as Lakeshore and Amenity Site AIK/A The Sands - Lakeview - Draft Resolution 02- 027. LOCATION: West side of North SR A-1-A, directly south of the North Hutchinson Island Wastewater Treatment Facility and east of the existing Sands, Lakeview development. EXISTING ZONING: HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) FUTURE LAND USE: RM (Residential Medium) PARCEL SIZE: 4.08 acres SURROUNDING ZONING: HIRD to the south, east, and west. U (Utilities to the north. PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - Century 21) to the east. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is residential with limited commercial to the east and south. The Future Land Use Classification of the surrounding area is RM (Residential Medium). FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Fire Station Number #9 (3595 North SR A-1-A) is located approximately 0.5 miles to the north. UTILITY SERVICE: Water and sewer service is to be provided by the St. Lucie County Utilities Department. ~ ...I January 9, 2002 Page 2 Subject: Sands, Lakeview Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS: Right-of-Way Adequacy: See Comments Scheduled Area Improvements: See Comment TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity ******************************************** STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Section 11.02.07, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum Standards of Review for all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for Major Site Plan approval, utilizing these requirements and notes the following: A. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed building or use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of Sf. Lucie County; and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of Sf. Lucie County. The proposed Sands, Lakeview - Lakeshore and Amenity Site is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes maximum densities for the RM (Residential Medium) Future Land Use Category as 9 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project is to be developed with a maximum density of 18 units. The proposed project has a density of 4.4, therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. "'" ..., January 9, 2002 Page 3 Subject: Sands, Lakeview Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan B. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES 1. The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse effect upon nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed Sands, Lakeview - Lakeshore and Amenity Site has been determined to not have an undue or adverse effect upon nearby properties. The development is not expected to cause any of the transportation links in this area to fall below an acceptable minimum level of service. 2. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. The applicant for the proposed project has designed the project in a manner that minimizes the impact to existing wetlands found on-site. The adjacent property to the north, east, and south will be buffered from the proposed development through landscaping and screening. 3. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of neighboring properties. The property to the north is the location of the existing North Hutchinson Island Wastewater Treatment facility. To the south is an existing 18-unit residential phase of the Sands, Lakeview project that is similar in design to the proposed project. Across the street to the west are high-rise condominium projects. Directly to the northeast is a proposed real estate office (Century 21 - PNRD). C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public Facilities. "" """" January 9, 2002 Page 4 Subject: Sands, Lakeview Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan The development is not expected to cause any of the transportation links in this area to fall below an acceptable minimum level of service. The proposed Sands, Lakeview - Lakeshore and Amenity Site project will be serviced by the St. Lucie County Utilities Department for water and sewer requirements. D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Fire District written confirmation that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. The applicant has obtained confirmation from the St. Lucie County Fire District that the proposed plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES The proposed Sands, Lakeview - Lakeshore and Amenity Site are not expected to have a significant impact on the County school system. F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section 11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chaptèr VIII, "Natural Environment Analysis': of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. (August, 1982). The Sands, Lakeview - Lakeshore and Amenity Site are proposed to be located on land that was previously cleared and has no areas of environmental significance. COMMENTS: The applicant, Brandon Capital Corporation, has applied for a major adjustment to a major site plan approval for the project to be known as Sands, Lakeview - Lakeshore and Amenity Site, which is a proposed 18-unit multiple-family project. The applicant is proposing to reduce a previously approved 54-unit, 9-story condominium with 12 single- family units and 3 duplex units., a reduction of 67 percent. Because the applicant is '-' ~ January 9, 2002 Page 5 Subject: Sands, Lakeview Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan proposing to reduce the density of anyone phase of this development by more than 10 percent, it qualifies to be reviewed as a major adjustment. Staff has reviewed the request for a major adjustment to a major site plan approval and has determined that it is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and not in conflict with the Goals, Objectives, or Policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 02-027, which, if approved, would grant this request for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan Approval. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-027. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED: lopment Director hf cc: Mark Hessee County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Planning Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 "" ..J RESOLUTION 02-027 FILE NO.: MNSP-01-o09 A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL TO A MAJOR ADJUSTMENT TO AN EXISTING MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS SANDS, LAKEVIEW - LAKESHORE AND AMENITY SITE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. On May 13, 1980, the Board of County Commissioners granted approval to 498 multiple- family units in 30 buildings for the project known as The Sands. The site, which is the subject of this approval, was approved for a 9-story, high-rise condominium building containing 54 units. 2. Brandon Capital Corporation. has applied for a major adjustment to a major site plan approval for the project to be known as Sands, Lakeview - Lakeshore and Amenity Site consisting of 12 single-family units and 3 duplex units for a total of 18 units for property located on the north side of Lakeview Circle and adjacent to North SRA-1-A in the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for the property described in Part B. 3. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code and to be consistent with the future land use maps from the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of S1. Lucie County. 5. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 6. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. 7. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. FileNo.:MJSP-01-009 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-027 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '-' ..., 8. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. 9. The applicant has applied for and received a revised certificate of capacity, a copy of which is attached to this order as Exhibit A, as required under Chapter V, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project known as Sands, Lakeview - Lakeshore and Amenity Site, is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Plata Engineering, Inc. dated November 16,2001, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Director on November 19, 2001, for the property described as follows: THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS TRACT "A-1" OF CORAL COVE BEACH SECTION ONE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 30 A AND B OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 2 AND 3, SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, LYING WEST OF STATE ROAD A-1-A AND NORTH OF SAID "CORAL COVE BEACH SECTION ONE", AND THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3,4, AND 5, IN SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, LYING NORTH OF SAID "CORAL COVE BEACH SECTION ONE" AND EAST OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF WILDCAT COVE. (Tax ID#: 1425-0001-230-010/5) (Location: North side ot Lakeview Circle, adjacent to the west right-ot-way ot North SR A-1-A) B. The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution for the purpose of obtaining building permits on this property and the approvals granted under the resolution shall remain effective for the remaining validity period of the Sands, Lakeview major site plan. C. The Final Site Plan approval granted under this resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Brandon Capital Corporation, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to; the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part A. FileNo. :MJSP-O 1-009 January 15, 2002 Resolution 02-027 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ~ ..., D. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. E. The revised certificate of capacity, attached as Exhibit A, shall be valid for the same period as this order. If this order expires or otherwise terminates, the certificate of capacity shall automatically terminate. F. A copy of this Order shall be mailed, retum receipt requested to the developer and agent of record as identified on the site plan applications. G. A copy of this Order shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. I. This Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward xxx Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 15th Day of January 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman FileNo.:MJSP-01-009 January 15. 2002 Resolution 02-027 Page 3 '-' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ....I Deputy Clerk hf H :\WORD\RESOLUTION\FINISHED.02\SandsLkSr.SP\SandsLkSr.doc FileNo.:MJSP-01-009 January 15, 2002 County Attorney Resolution 02-027 Page 4 ~ AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. 'f!JtII DATE: January is, 2002 REGULAR [ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: Amtrak East Coast Passenger Service Project BACKGROUND: See attachment: Emailletter from Commissioner Doug Smith, Martin County. Commissioner Smith was contacted by phone to determine exactly what participation would be required for the appointed Commissioner. Commissioner Smith plans to develop an email list of those appointed from the various counties and cities along the east coast of Florida, and the group would communicate primarily via email to support and follow the project. Commissioner Smith did anticipate that at some point, the group may need or wish to meet in a formal meeting setting, but feels that attending meetings would be minimal. FUNDS AVAILABLE: NjA PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board appoint a Commissioner to act as a liaison to work actively follow and participate in the ongoing Amtrak project. [ x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Commissioner Lewis volunteered COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Approvals County At torney, Management & Budget Purchasing: ~~Anderson - Amt;:ak~t Coast Passenger Service Miami to Jacksonville -,.J Page 11 From: Anna Colgan x2359 <acolgan@martin,fl.us> To: <douga@stlucieco,gov>, <jchandler@bcc.co.indian-river.fl.us>, <ccoto@co,volusia.fl,us>, <tom.jenkins@countygovt.brevard,fl.us>, <benadams@co,stjohns.fl.us>, <mousa@coj.net> Date: 1/8/029:49AM Subject: Amtrak-East Coast Passenger Service Miami to Jacksonville January 8, 2001 To: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, St. Lucie County James Chandler, County Administrator, Indian River County Cynthia Coto, County Manager, Volusia County Tom Jenkins, County Manager, Brevard County Ben W. Adams, Jr, County Administrator, St. Johns County Sam Mousa, Chief Administration Officer,Duval County !bf\ Re: Amtrak - East Coast Passenger Service Miami to Jacksonville ,~ ~ 'fA&. ~~ ~I ~\J {Yf / ~ I~~ I strongly believe it would be beneficial for all the counties along Florida's east coast to provide strong united support, together with the cities, for Amtrak's planned Florida east coast passenger line from Miami to Jacksonville. The train's proposed route would include eight new stations at Fort Pierce, Stuart, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, St. Augustine, Cocoa Beach and Melbourne, Various city government officials recently visited Governor Bush in Tallahassee and received his endorsement and support to move forward on the Amtrak project. Governor Bush authorized $8 million for the project, in addition to the $15.5 million the state Department of Transportation earmarked. Additional funds to complete the $82.5 million project to be provided by Amtrak, Florida East Coast Railway and the cities served by the route, The DOT hopes to open the line in spring 2003, The state anticipates providing 80 percent and the cities will provide 20 percent of the money to build stations. I would greatly appreciate if you could discuss with your commission the idea of appointing one commissioner to act as a liaison to work with the city and to actively follow and participate in the ongoing Amtrak project. On behalf of Martin County, I have been appointed to actively follow and assist the City of Stuart in the quest for Amtrak service, Thank you for your support of this project and I would greatly be interested in the results of this request. cc: dsmith <dsmith@martin,fl.us> ~~~J () 1rÞ " ~/jw. /I' . 1,tl/l1: f ¡¡JryO !~b /4 Æþft~~~ þ~ 7 (1" Sincerely Commissioner Doug Smith Martin County tel: 561-221-2359 email: dsmith@martin.fl.us \. AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. .~ DATE: January 15, 2002 REGULAR [ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: Educational Campaign and Legislative Strategy BACKGROUND: The Florida Association of Counties encourages counties to consider purchasing full-page or 2/3 page ads to address unfunded mandates and cost shifts to state level. See attached sample advertisement and sample Letter to the Editor. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting Board direction on the Florida Association of Counties request to provide coverage in the local newspaper as well as submission of a Letter to the Editor regarding the Educational Campaign and Legislative Strategy. [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [X] OTHER: Pulled prior to meeting. ",.- nderson dministrator COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) EU. 5/96 01/08/2V102 16:30 FL qSSOCIHTJON OF COJNT[ES ~ 615614621648 ,~O. 040 [;\2101 '-" .-. . ... FLOR_-. -, ASSOClATi -& =: [J' COUN !II: ..- -..I P.O. 8m 549/Tallahassee, Florida .12302 PhlJlle,850/922-43oo SUllcomr 292·4300 1'4X: 850/488-7501 Websirr: www.fl-coontí...$.cum MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: County Commission Chairs {èJ Mary Kay Cariseo, Executive Director Carol L. Braey, Legislative Director DATE: December 7, 2001 RE: Educational Campaign & Legislativ, Strategy The Florida Association of Counties (FAC) Board of Directors took action at its last meeting to pursue an Educational Campaîgn and Legislative Strategy to address unfunded mandates and costs shifts at the state leveL Attached is the first step of the plan, which provides specific action steps each county should undertake in preparation for the 2002 Regular Session. Although counties were successful in fendìng off additional Medicaid costs and other major cost shifts during the special session, many of these major funding issues will be revisited during the regular session. FAC encourages counties to consider purchasing full-page or 213 page ads. Also, counties that are serviced by newspapers that provide multi-county coverage should consider cost sharing to minìmize ad costs. Please contact Linda Parrish at the FAC office by Friday, December 21 if your county is interested in running a "First Line of Defense" ad. A camera-ready ad will be forw;¡¡¡rdEtd to your county once FAC has been notified. It is important that counties continue to have a strong and unified voice in Tallahassee We thank yOu for your continued support and advocacy. Happy Holidays! Attachments MKC/clb cc: FAC Board of Directors County Administrators County Attorneys County Lobbyists MARY 1C>\Y C4R'SEO . fKfCUTlVE DIRECiOR I KAREN l M4RCU$ PRf5/0fNr PAlM AAC::H I CHUCK OIJ/tlNIC/i. PRESIDENT. fLfeT 05('tQU Ie, CUI'MAXCI' /srVICE PRESJDE.vr HlCHLANDS I CUf'I: THAE!l 2ND VICE PRESIDENT LEON ØV08/2ØØ2 16:30 FL ASSOCIATION OF COU~T[ES ~ 615614621648 'jO. 040 r;¡Ø04 For More Than 150 Years We've Been the First Une of Defense Don't Make Us the First Target Pubic $à(ety, 'lint ,þn)tGOtiOn. pubIio heGIöI. ernerøen~ respon8G. Whun there's a need Dr aor1sis. FIorkllans don't tum to Te/~ th6y tum to county p-etnment end JoeaI MlNl'ces. Law ~~nt oflicers,. &relightens. pubic heanh nurses and doctors. .nvlronmenb11 œchnldala. animal con1roI omœrs - local dtizens. ~rkïng forCDUnty gawunment, proteCtfng and sen.4ng lceal c:ommunllles. If the Florida legtaI8Þ.n ~........ ~ 8I1ift more of ihè exst of statewide ~ like M~idto IaDIIII property t8Xpeyera., then e\"li!N')'bOdy Ioa_ - either needed JQœJ MMCIr$ are CIIt or local taxEB h8vet1D be raised.. ContaQt your 1oœI18QI$IatDrs ~nd tell them to steip tl'1e 00S0I shifts to counties. Far more thar1 150)'1!181S county govemrnen. ha$ beei" 'the 'fiinst line of der.nee for FIorii;k¡¡'. communUiN. Don't me~ U8 1hé ñI'8t target. Have The Courage, Talahasseø Don1 Compromise Rorida's Rrst U.. of Def8nse ., I 01/08/;:;0Ø;:; 16:30 FL RSSOCIRTION OF C(UNTIES "" 6156~4621648 NO.04Ø [J003 ~ SAMPLE LETTER TO THE EDITOR .....,1 Dear Editor: The crisis facing our nation since September 11 has reinforced, mora than ever, the vital importance of services provided by county governments in Florida and throughout America, Public safety, fire protection, public health, emergency response, hazardous materials - when there is a crisis, citizens rely on county government and county services as their first line of defense. Recent events, combined with the already sluggish economy, have had a financial impact on Florida. as well as the entire nation, How does the Florida Legislature want to solve the state's budget problems? They want to shift more of the cost for statewide programs like Medicaid to local property taxpayers. When this happens everyone 10$9S -- either needed local programs and services are cut or local taxes have to be raised, This isn't about bloated. government bureaucracies or unneeded services, This is about critical - and often life-saving - everyday community services. It's about law enforcement officers, firefighters, paramedics, public health nurses and doctors, environmental technicians, animal control officers - local citizens, working for local government, protecting and serving local communities, And, it's about programs that add to the quality of life in our community - libraries, elder services, programs for children, recycling, environmental conservation and more, During times of crisis, me need fer government services increases; therefore, balancing the state budget by shifting costs to local communities is wrong-- especially now, Contact your local ìegislators and tell them don't shift the problem, solve it! For more than 150 years county government has been the first line of defense for Florida communities. Don't make us the first target. ;Ji/08/2002 16:30 FL ASSOCIATION CF Cru'lTIES "' 615614621648 NO. 040 G1002 '-' 'wi . EDUCATIONAL CAMPAIGN A LEGISLATIVE 'TRATEGY O.,ICTlVE'1 Secl../re CQmmitment from legblaton to support county position during 2002 session on unfunded mandates, cost shifts, local control, and Anicle VI Revision 7 Implementation. OB,ECllVI :II Generate grassroob support for countll MIM prior to senion. ACTION 'TIPS I. InvitO leg5JatoJ"S to board of tounty cQmmission meetings to diKu" regular session cost shifts, unfunded mandates and Artidé V. 2. County Commiuionen submit gUéSt. column tQ local editorial sectionl foc:u~ing on Legislature's "shfftlshaft" philosophy. Include specifics on impact of funding shifts to counties' role Q5 "Ant Line of Defertle" for citizens. ('_p.. ...... .......L) 3. Run "Fint Line of Defense" ad In major motto dailies (Friday or Sunday ed"ltions only), the weeJ:rend prior to the start of the Regular Session (S8lislon start date k Ian. :22). Additionally, COW1ties should also consider utilizing other media outlel:s such æ local governmenl: access channels and county wel»ltes. (NOn. If applicable. counties should aka consider regional purchœlng of the Ad to beep costs to a minimum.) Contact LInda Parrish at FAC 0ff1œ by Dec. 2. to got 0: c:amera-ready copy of Ad. 4. Initiate dialogue with local coalition groups on state tax reform. Croups to include~ · Chamben of Commerco · Homeowners Associations · Homebuilders Associotions · Health Care Organizations (e.g., hospital CEOs,. local MecfÇQ1 Societies) · Union groups (e.g., police, fite, te((ht.tn. public employees) · Agriculture and Farm Bureau C~5 · School Boatds · Qtiøs PAC AtI.pMtI P..a¡... .. IllIIe'_ R...... SUItltORT efforts to reform and simplify the state tax system that result in 0 long-term sustainable tax structuro. No additîoncd tax cuts should be implemented until this reform is Qchleved. A state tax reform initiative should: · Enhance equity by divenifying the tax base; · Provide adequate state funding for mandated local programs and,. in absence of stQte funding. reduce or eliminate mandates; · Not increasè Ioc:cd tCJ)( burden or servicE: responsibility bl shifting c;:osts to the locallelle~ · Allow the state to fully fund current program~ · Maximize state fund, that draw down federal dollars; and · Provide suffICient revenues for the state to meet Article V responsibilities. · ... 01/11/02 p'7ABWARR FUND 001 001140 001143 001243 001265 001269 001809 101 101003 101006 102 102001 102104 105 107 107001 107002 107003 107125 140 140001 l _ .:5 183001 183002 183004 184203 184804 185002 310002 316 316001 382 389 401 418 421 441 448 451 461 471 491 505 505001 611 C"') '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...., WARRANT LIST #15- 05-JAN-2002 TO 11-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 Childern's Environ. Learning Center TDC Planning Grant FY01/02 FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper USDOJ/BJA SCAAP FY01/02 Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration FIND So. Causeway Shoreline Stabil. SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 Impact Fees-Parks County Capital Transportation Capital Environmental Land Capital Fund Rouse Road MSBU Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities Renewal & Replacement Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Impact Fees Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 476,419.44 1,260.86 889.60 13,531.86 144.05 353.25 10.85 67,818.50 8,830.11 620.00 22,208.02 3,673.52 11.20 2,090.64 8,745,790.34 179.14 17,034.30 1,978.49 103,480.00 13,683.78 69,178.12 2,354.46 1,346.55 842.68 325.00 712.03 9,251.58 2,844.42 10,058.40 3,640.01 4,791.34 540.00 350.00 19,863.00 96,282.64 16,444.99 76.27 13,561. 73 41,715.62 12,375.58 23,411.47 3,625.02 10,676.05 18,195.37 13,327.15 1,799.16 34,993.78 4,546.80 9,897,137.17 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,156.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,156.41 , . 01/11/02 F"7.ABWARR L'LlND : CHECK 00279187 \...t ,.." ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD VOID LIST# 15- 05-JAN-2002 TO I1-JAN-2002 PAGE 1 001 - General Fund INVOICE VENDOR 12206014 All About Travel TOTAL 460.49 460.49 FUND TOTAL: '-' ...,,¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ~ DATE: January 15, 2002 "Investment for the Future" REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 onald B. We ,P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Work Authorization No.3 to the Contract for Professional Services related to Stormwater Management with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., for Harmony Heights Stormwater Master Plan BACKGROUND: The Harmony Heights Homeowners' Association has requested St. Lucie County provide drainage and roadway improvements to their ~ubdivision. Roadway improvements cannot be constructed without first improving drainage in the subdivision. '¡' The attached engineering proposal from BCI outlines the scope of services for the development of a stormwater master planto include project management, design, modeling, cost estimate, and permitting. This will be work authorization no. 3 with BCI in the amount of $66,235.20 . . FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in 102001-3725-563005-,42507 Drainage Maintenance- MSTU PREVIOUS ACTION: nfa RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Work Authorization NO.3 with BCI in the amount of $66,235.20 for the development of a stormwater master plan for Harmony Heights Subdivision and authorization for the Chairman to sign. [X] APPROVED [] OTHER: [ ] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: [x]County Attorney [x]Originating Dept. Public Works [ ]Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) harmony heights drainage.ag CoordinationlSianatures [x]Mgt. & Budget 1If) (PI M) [X]Co.Eng~ [x]Revenue Coord~ t'\ [ ]other '-' ...." WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.3 Engineering Services Related to Stormwater Management COO-06-086 for Harmony Heights Drainage Improvements Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc.(the "Engineer") dated June 13, 2000, the Engineer agrees to provide the Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A" and for the Compensation described in Exhibit "B". All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit "C". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ENGINEER BY: Print Name: BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. Date: '-' -...I EXHIBIT A ST. LUCIE COUNTY ENGINEERING DIVISION Harmony Heights Master Drainage & Roadway Improvements Plan Scope of Services I. Description St. Lucie County Stormwater Management Services II. Provisions for Work Engineering services will be accomplished in accordance with the St. Lucie County Continuing Engineering Services Contract. III. Project Description - Harmony Heights Master Drainage & Roadway Improvements Plan This work will be accomplished in compliance with local water management district requirements. IV. Scope of Services BCI will provide project management and engineering services using staff and resources from our Lakeland office to provide full technical support to St. Lucie County. BCI will be assisted by Pickett & Associates for survey services for the project. BCI will provide all equipment and materials necessary to conduct these engineering services. It is understood that St. Lucie County desires to develop a master plan for the approximately 320 acre Harmony Heights subdivision as shown on Exhibit D. Specifically, St. Lucie County Public Works desires to use milled asphalt for the roads within the subdivision. However the existing drainage level of service is deficient. The subdivision is bordered by Taylor Creek (SFWMD Canal C-25) to the south and Ft. Pierce Farms Water Control District's (FPFWCD) Canal No. I on the north. The subdivision has numerous small depressional areas that flood the road rights-of-way and yards as well. It is unknown at this time what the extent of structure flooding is in the area. St. Lucie Public Works desires to develop a master plan that will allow the County to improve the drainage within the subdivision in a phased approach. Roadway improvements will bc possible concurrent with or after the drainage improvements have been made. St. Lucie County has requested that BCI provide an engineering scope of services to assist the County in developing the Master Plan with consideration for cost estimation for phasing purposes, conceptual and final permitting and design, grant application preparation assistance and other tasks as needed. Design for Phase One will be conducted under a separate task work order and BCl understands that the County desires the phasing plan to allow for minimal or no land acquisition in the area designated for Phase One. St. Lucie County understands that SFWMD desires to participate in funding the project due to the improvement in water quality discharges that can be realized for Taylor Creek and the Indian River Lagoon. Services to be managed and developed during the term of this agreement will address development of the Master Plan, conceptual cost estimation and permitting, and grant application preparation. These services will specifically include: '-' ,..." Exhibit A- Harmony Heights Master Plan Page 2 of 4 · Project Meetings including a kickoff meeting and twe three other meetings to be scheduled when the County deems most beneficial to the project. · Aerial topographic services of the project area will be provided to assist with the planning and design work of this project. o Establish sufficient survey ground control throughout the project site (5 points estimated). o Acquire Black and White aerial photography and production of Topographic and Planimetric Mapping with one-foot contour interval and a map scale of 1"=50'. The expected accuracies on the spot heights would be 0.25'. Photography would allow for clear resolution at a I "=30' scale. o Provide digital deliverables in ACAD®vI4 and Geo-tiffformats on the correct horizontal and vertical datum. o All mapping work shall meet or exceed the Florida Minimum Technical Standards as set forth in Rule 61G17. Contours in partially obscure areas will be dashed and accuracy standards will not apply in these areas. Areas totally obscured will be left blank and designated as such. o Collect elevation, size and location data for primary culverts within the project area. · Convert property appraiser parcel line work to Autocad®-format line work. Information included shall be parcel lot numbers, parcel dimensions, right-of-way lines, and street names for the active project area. · Collect grab sample of representative discharge from one of the existing outfall pipes serving the subdivision. This sample will be analyzed for TSS, TP and TN for the purposes of more accurately quantifying the existing pollutant loads from the subdivision (as opposed to strictly using regional event mean concentrations for these pollutant parameters) . · Conduct hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the existing system using an industry standard model such as adICPR®. Quasi-calibration will be attempted for a given storm event data in which flood level data is available. The proposed conceptual drainage system will then be modeled. It is our understanding St. Lucie County desires roadside swales and appropriate culvert cross drainage. The concept drainage design will allow for a level of service standard for the 10-year/ I day storm event. Storm water quality (pollutant loads) will be modeled and estimated for select critical pollutant parameters for the existing and proposed conditions using a spreadsheet model. · Attend a pre-application meeting with SFWMD to discuss the requirements for submittal of a Conceptual ERP permit. BCI understands that an impervious roadway course should be assumed for permitting purposes as it is difficult to predict whether asphalt millings, cold mix, or standard asphaltic concrete will be used in construction. · Preparation of a concept phasing and master drainage and roadway plan for (60% and 100%) two reviews and approval by St. Lucie County. The plan will consist of a report with a discussion of the following: o Background & Data Sources o Existing Conditions (Hydrologic and Hydraulic) "" '...I Exhibit A- Harmony Heights Master Plan Page 3 of 4 o Existing Conditions (Water Quality) o Problem Areas o Level of Service o Regulatory Requirements o Recommended Parcel and Easement Acquisitions o Recommendations with Phasing Cost Estimates o Phasing Layout Plan o Concept Drainage & Roadway Improvement Plan (Overlay on Aerials) · It is anticipated that stormwater detention facilities may be required to facilitate both grant funding and permit acquisition and this will be known based on the pre-application meeting with the WMD. Necessary land parcel and easement needs will be identified through this task. It is our understanding the County is prepared for such contingencies. · Coordination with utility companies (sanitary and potable water) relative to the project phasing to assess the utilities' future plans and how they relate to the Master Plan. This project could potentially qualify under CDBG or other types of public works funding programs. · Preparation of engineer's opinion of probable cost for surveying, engineering design, construction and maintenance of all phases of the project. .. Preparation and submittal of a conceptual permit application to the SFWMD. Should the WMD have requests for additional information, BCI will provide responses to two rounds of comments (as applicable) from the WMD. We have assumed that several isolated wetlands exist in the project area and that sufficient staff effort is provided to coarsely delineate the wetlands for purposes of acknowledging their existence in the permit application. Details of the conceptual permit objectives will be developed based on input received at the pre-application meeting. BCl understands that St. Lucie County desires to avoid commitments on timing of individual phase construction until funding sources have been identified. · Project Progress Reports- Monthly status reports will be provided to St. Lucie County. Additionally, we anticipate much communication during the concept design phase to ensure the County has constant input on the proposed design. It is anticipated that the final deliverables will include the following: · Stormwater Master Plan Report including phase cost estimates, funding sources discussion, drainage level of service projections, and phasing schedule; · Conceptual design plans including a phasing plan sheet and conceptual drainage improvements plan sheets with aerial topographic information; · SFWMD Conceptual Environmental Resource Permitt Items Specifically not Included in the Scope of Work and associated budget include: · Stormwater Modeling associated with Final Design '-' ,...., Exhibit Á- Harmony Heights Master Plan Page 4 of 4 · FEMA Map Revisions Agency Permit Application Fees Easement Negotiations/Agreements Boundary, RIW, Topographic Survey (except as outlined above) Ground Water Modeling Contamination Assessments Wetland Delineation (Minimum Survey standards) or Impacts Assessment Design Engineering, Plans Preparation or Design Survey Construction Related Services Any Permitting through FPFWCD (assume straight-forward permitting during construction phases due to existing consistency with SFWMD criteria) · · · · · · · · · V. Information Provided by St. Lucie County S1. Lucie County will provide plat maps, as-built plans of known improvements in the project area, drainage maps, GIS coverages of parcel data, topographic information and other similar County information. St. Lucie County staff will convert propcrty appraiser parcel information coverages (DGN format) to Autocad® file format with no manipulation of line work. VI. Period of Service BCT will provide the services for the above scope upon receiving a notice to proceed. The project will be completed with the final deliverable made per the attached project schedule (Exhibit C) to comply with the probable grant funding schedule. Exhibit B ST, LUCIE COUNTY· CONTINUING ENGINEERING SERVICES (STORMWA TERJ BCI LABOR COST AND EXPENSES ProJ.,.,tNam..: St.lucleCounìyProJectMenager' Bel Project Number: Date: W:>rk Ods! :3 _ Harmony Hsights Mastsr Plan Development DonWest,PE W19100B8.30 17-Dsc-Q1 Sheet 1 of 1 LABOR HOURS " eo " 80 0 116 10 >0 " " 00 " 29' " " 0 '" " 00 728 no TASK srES'n rojed Meeìjngs!. Contrad Management rial Top:>gr~phicVlobrk (Coordin~bonw/Sub) þðrty Apþl'elser File Conwrsion tor Parcel seMap 4A Hydrolo~ic/H)'drauliclQuality Spreadsheet Modeling 4B 'Nate! C'ua~ty Analyses '¡re_apP'iC3bOl1M,,"'nn9withSFWliJO ÐA a!de<PlanDevelopment 68 esp:>nse to Countl Review5 of concept Plans/Final ""'" , onœplu"IERPAppllcationPrep"r"tionlRe~nse ~otal Ta-sk H¡¡ur~ otal Y""k Cost OTAl MAN HOURS BY STAFF POSITION OTAlCOST BY STAFF POSITION " " 32 " 8 80 " ntSurvey(Aerlall phlçfSpeclflcPurpose) CE-- Cost $56,235.20 $10,000.00 66235.l0 '-"' i ! --f--- - 1------ -- .n___ -- --- -- . u._ _ -- , , l- i Ll.. I ~ ... 0 . ¡ .. : : : I I I I I I~ I~ ~I.I!!..!!! c J: :;:¡ :;:¡ I' .21"C OQ)Q) o :z:: 'fi o .!!! I ~ (/) :Ë g~1 Eo õ :E...J ....~ ><...~e W(/) :z::o.. .....,/ r-tJ I T 1 a.. I I , Ig - « T I I I~ --- :;:¡ ., .. (9 Q) - ~~- un C-- C :;:¡ -,!!1-- ., ¡;jL.._ ad-- I ¡; ~I-- 0 :::E . mI- I :JI- . CD QJ a::: QJ '5: .~ ..... Qj « 0 ~ m ,§ ~ - §I-----~ _ 01_0 o CD I/)~I/) lYf-lY ~ ~-~ u ,- I cl-----I-g I I ~ :lit: fa __ - I --I- I I I T I -r- ¡ M cx:i '" '" o ~ en ~ c o :¡:¡ Co .¡: CJ 1/1 ~ ~ I/ ~ I- '" Q) '" OJ e: e: ~ .~ ~ .r: ~ êã ~ C) .§,_ e:UJ m .- e: § '" ro E ·E o ....U- Q)_Ei- ._ 0 CL .c Q) 15 ~ 0 _::sa.. E (5 :2; ,... Co (f.) , ..... U ~ ~~ì::CL ~ ro LL "'C5·Qt ECf.l15 CI?..... COUro 0 ",Q)O cO '-0- .::!:::()_ I Q,)o:::~œQ.) -&J '2: ~ .~ E -0 ~ 5r a:: ._ CD c: g __ a. c: a L... " -. ~(/) I:O+:; ~-º ca~a.._~ « OJ.~ ê:2;!g g;,-g § "'ro c:.5: ctJ ~ t: Q) m ro :.¡:; ~ E :J in' C L... 0 CI .S: - rJ iJ :.¡:::: Q)~§g:¡::;c~5t;::L...UJ (f.):J ~U r¡.J!!0 u g;!g!:!:!- _V'Jrv Cf)==CL- c«= (/) O_LL..Q.)Q.....a.o 11,)0> Q) ro -0 ._ Co Q) Q) U :t:: 0 e: '0 '¡:: - :::: co 1;) () c E - ; '-~.~~ ~ ro g'r3' I.... co Q) CL u.:J Il. :::E U 0 Q) .e: ~ to Il. u..:, '5 i I ò z - u c 'õ' ò: ¡:¡ m ----...... 'j~ 1 \.I ....¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C -2b DATE: January 15, 2002 "INVESTMENT FOR tHE FUTURE" TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONBRS REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: ~~~f'(~~ County Engineer SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): PUBLIC WORK~ pEPT. SUBJECT: Approve Change Order No.1 in the amount of $41,202.20 for the Orange Avenue / Header Canal Bridge Replacement with a Con/Span Bridge System project. The site soils proved more difficult to work with than originally anticipated.! The majority of the site soils excavated were unsuitable for the use as backfill material for the project. Suitable material. in order to complete the project with minimal impact to the contract schedule and traveling public, needed to be trucked to the site to backfill the excavation. Approval of this change order will cover the additional materials and activities enabling the completion of the project. No additional change orders are anticipated. _ BACKGROUND: On March 13, 2001, the Board awarded The Murphy Construction Co. a contract in the amount of $598,917.40 for the replacement of a deficient two-lane bridge with an 100-foot single span arched culvert structure. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Fund No. 316001-41133-599330-431016 Transportation Capital- Transportation Trust - Local Option Bric;lge Maintenance. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board awarded the Orange Avenue / Header Canal Bridge Replacement with a Con/Span Bridge System project contract on Marc¡:h13, 2001 in the amount of $598.917;40. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve and authorize the chairman to sign Change Order NO.1 in the amount of $41 ,202.20 for a total contract price of $640.119.60 to The Murphy Construction Company Co. to complete modification to the project. ,] APPROVED [] OTHER [] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: [x) Purchasing [x) Budget & Rev. Coor. «.vI2- ~ ~ "" """" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C -2b DATE: January 15, 2002 "INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE" REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. .ßt\'{\~f· ~~ (Don West, P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Approve Change Order NO.1 in the amount of $41,202.20 for the Orange Avenue / Header Canal Bridge Replacement with a Con/Span Bridge System project. The site soils proved more difficult to work with than originally anticipated. The majority of the site soils excavated were unsuitable for the use as backfill material for the project. Suitable material, in order to complete the project with minimal impact to the contract schedule and traveling public, needed to be trucked to the site to backfill the excavation. Approval of this change order will cover the additional materials and activities enabling the completion of the project. No additional change orders are anticipated. BACKGROUND: On March 13, 2001, the Board awarded The Murphy Construction Co. a contract in the amount of $598,917.40 for the replacement of a deficient two-lane bridge with an 100-foot single span arched culvert structure. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Fund No. 316001-41133-599330-431016 Transportation Capital- Transportation Trust - Local Option Bridge Maintenance. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board awarded the Orange Avenue / Header Canal Bridge Replacement with a Con/Span Bridge System project contract on March 13, 2001 in the amount of $598,917.40. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve and authorize the chairman to sign Change Order NO.1 in the amount of $41 ,202.20 for a total contract price of $640,119.60 to The Murphy Construction Company Co. to complete modification to the project. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [] APPROVED [] OTHER [] DENIED [x] County Attorney [x] Originating Dep.tR'UbliC IN='<s [x] Finance '1'r\~ ' , (Check for copy only, it? ~/ Douglas Anderson County Administrator [x] Mgt. & Budget ÍIJ() c/71ì hì~ [x] Purchasing [x] Project. Man, CA\o\ \_ [x] Budget & Rev. COOL ~ ~ ~ ..., CHANGE ORDER ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROJECT: ORANGE AVE/HEADER CANAL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (name, address) CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: No.1 INITIATION DATE: 1/9/02 TO (Contractor): CONSULTANT'S PROJECT NO.: N/A The Murphy Construction Co. POBox 3768 West Palm Beach, FL 33402 ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: C01.{)3-344 CONTRACT DATE: 3/13/01 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A - Yes) SEE ATTACHED The original (Contract Sum) was. . . . . , , , , ' . , , , . Net change by previous authorized Change orders The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was The (Contract Sum) will be (increased) by this Change Order. . . . . . . . , . . . , . . , , , . . , , , , , . . . . . . . . . . The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be ..,. The Contract Time will be (increased) by . . . , . . , . , . . . . . , , . The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date ofthis Change Order therefore is: . -...... . , , . . , , . . , , . . , , , . . , , , ,. $598,917.40 . . , . . , , . . . , , , ' . . . , , . , , . . , , . . ,. $ -0- . , " $598,917.40 .. $41,202.20 $640,119.60 . (30 ) Days 1/25/02 Funds Available: Account Number: 316001-41133-599330-431016 The adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the Contractor for the work or changes defined in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments include the costs and delays for all work contained in the Change Order, including costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non- affected work under this Contract: Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract price or time as a resu~ of increases or decreases in costs and time of performance caused directly and indirectly from the Change Order, subject to the current scope of the entire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor that the Change Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed. All work performed under this Change Order shall be performed in accordance with the contract specifications. Recommended: SI. Lucie County, Enqineerinq Div. Architect/Engineer 2300 Virqinia Ave.. Ft: Pierce, FL 34982 Address Approved: Public Works Department SI. Lucie County Department 2300 Virqinia Ave., FI. Pierce, FL 34982 Address By: Craig Hauschild, P.E. Agreed To: 1/8102 Date By: RayWazny, P,E. Date Authorized SI. Lucie County: 2300 Virginia Ave, Ft: Pierce, FL 34982 The Murphy Construction Co. Contractor By: Date POBox 3768, West Palm Beach, FL 33402 Address Approved as to Form and Correctness County Attorney By: Date ~... "'Jen "'L.oI'1111 ~þ 08 0, 1 I : , \..- St LUCI~ ~QUnt~ E~~ln.pr 1)61 ~&22362 ,...¡ t-'Al:>t. 112 p.2 t. r- CHANGe 0fIIDeft. aT. WCIt COUNTY PROJECT: ORANGE AVt:JHtADER CANAL DftIDOf; REPLACfMI!!Nf 1_. lIIId,..n) CHANCJE ORoeR NUMBeR: NO.1 1II1'I1A. TION DA T1!: 1/1102 TO (eo""'-t:. CONSULTAt<lT'S "ROJECT NO,: NIA TIHII Mv,..hy C:Oftatn'Gtion Co. IIOBoIIU.. w..c ....m S..ell. Fl 33401 ST, LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: COI.(J-3" CONTRACT DATI!: 3113101 VO\¡ ar. dlnlcled 10 maka lIIe fl:ltowing crtan,., in this Cðnlfatr' íAd~a: IIIMr IIt1acl'Bd as ExtIi~~ ,,- ""1 SEE AnACHEO The utlgin" (Con!nlcl IIl.Im; _ , .. .., ,.,'. Nit cnang. by ptWoua aull\ol'lEe<I CI1IftD'! oresen . . . . . . ., " TIle (Cornet Sum) Pr1otto thll CII'''IIB 0lIl..__ ,. Tile (CDnhat 8UtYI) ""fUll. ("'or."6:/) bythí&CIlan801W.. ....,............. . , Th. n_ (C_ 8_) InCfucfirlg this Chllll. Onr,o, will be .. .. '.. Th. ConIrUI TIro-e wit! be (inL'N_d) by ...,......... .. ., . Tha OU of 8ub-.nbl COmplBtlort a' Oflt!. dllle MIIIII Change om.rln.,.'D,. II~ F WId. AYII.eIIlr. Account Num»r 31eOO1-4~ 133{j~e330-4~ 1 O,~ The edjuBlmr1t" ContrKt PriCe and/or Conncc TIIr.. ~ in llliI Ctle"9. Ora" "'a. corrp"alll. Iotal pnce anolor IìIM aoJIJStment due or CM40 ilia C~œo, 10, ilia _k or .....'1$.. oallne<l :n 'he Cn.nge 0,..,. By e,..e¡;ting thie Che"!IB 0"'.... III a C on1reero: III'k"øwIed".. and aQIMB tIW ilia "PUlalllllllriolt.end/Qr 'ima .ojIJeIments :ne~da the C'J,ts ."d d_Iays Io,.d wane oanteined ;f'I ,,,,, Ch""ga OnIer. 4Rcludi.'IQ caetl ana 11_",. u.~ WCI\ lie 111_l1UpcIan., .eI1eaUIIs. _nasa O\IMI.eas.OelaV. .na eumu~ ""Plett or ~ple .hct on a' othar no,. .Il'ea.a _lit UIldOW thIS Contrut. $I¡ning 01 tile Change ONer con'1tUtn run r,d mutual aeeord end setNlactio" ror lhe edju~nt ~ conhct prfoa or an. .. a I'HIIt of inCIII_ 0' dec_ In eosts .nd lme 01 performallee eauHd d/recly .uI ltIalraclly !n)m 'he Chang. Order, SUbect '» t!Ie CUlJettt 'CQØe 01 ,lie ..ur. _rk It tel for1t\ 1ft '"0 Con:...ct Coco......... Acctlllllnee of 11Ii. w.""', =<I1I1I'!IrtM tI1 .Ø--I b~ tile C...."ty and ContoKtÐr l1l8I11141 Cl:a!lga O~.. rep....4Ir1S an eqUllable edju.tment tI:I the tonnc:t ana III~ Conlnlc:tor wI! WSMIIIII ngllts Ib N. · *"" on ",.. Chanll_ O~" .lIa, tit ptOpBtty _lItad. All work þtll'foln!Od \IoWar till' Change Order '.".H b_ performed in ac<:or.!lUIC. VIIII"a CðntnlCl $Ieci~:allon., S5~8.9'T,.C S -(I. $5;8.917 -4C ... 1f2S102 S4,2C22J $1140. 1 '.IJ~ . I 30 I Da~ Approv4l!l , Public WorI<5 DIIDBItIMIIt SI L"ci. C"'mly o.p.ttme", 2300 Vlloinl;!¡ Ave, Ft P/eroe FL 34982 "cld,... By: RayWlIZny. PE. Daile AU1I101tz4l!l SI. LUCI. County. 2Juo Virginia A.... Ft. Pill",.. F'L 34982 L;y; D.... Apprav.a u to Form and Cor,.""... Ccun,,, AIIGr~V -~ .~ - - -.~. "'" . . 1í '" 2' C) C> '" a. :q .. c ¡- CD E c GI .. , :d Ji ã. ê! CD II a: 1i CD 15. m e "0 8 't: m ãi c ... U .. CD "0 CI CD :t ci IJ ';i... i I~ > ~ -.: "'- CD >-:1 ~:I~Ë ~ ~~1~ o e~ w 0.1- i~ I ~ i D.U~!~ ..., ~ ~n~ ~ ~ âS~ 888~ 8 ij - . 8~~g8:¡:C>:688..::tci ~ l 10 ...D__:¡;;-.......:::t...~ .:.....;:¡...:.n...;i...:..: ..... .....~_...~ ~... ~ 8~~~8g88883~~ ~ I CaBlð çjo . . . . . . . ~ "'--~--:i:ä~8:i;;:;; .. .. ... .. - - '" vi _0 -: t= ..... ... ~J CO(f)U1c"I _g Ul5I:;"'-"'C)"'-~"'~ - ....~-~:-- ~ M . IfI-8."." j I 11::::~>~U: a:u: 1~~~i~l~u~-11 ::¡lJoog:¡:¡j",w~...J:'" £ç ~5 I =1 J IIU~~~ j r I~il-"w t~¡i~ i Iii ! .z.. J!,t ID.;rp,,1It1l) (/) . - wD. ~j~i..Si !....ti~ Ii. 2''''! ",I! I!......~ I ..iJ. ~ ~]~1t~~ ..ww .I-:O",cn~~a: ~ ~ N Ø> ~¡ ;: ~ë~;¡ :e...~~ ô N~~""'''''"; "'~~~"""'-N-.IG"""t'II . c:.....·ô....~~~" SNNN;;::""'" :::= ____"N....o,ðVl ......,... -.. - "'-----.--.---.. . . ,..-- ~ ~ '. ,.,<... AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO. C-3-A DATE: January 15, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Michael Rath, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Parking Garage Management Services for the Downtown Parking Garage. BACKGROUND: On December 11, 1998, the Board issued RFP No. 99-01 for Parking Garage Management Services for the Downtown Parking Garage. Four (4) vendors were notified, nine (9) proposal documents were distributed and one (1) proposal was received. The Review Committee met on February 8, 1999 to review and discuss the proposal received. It was determined as only one (1) proposal was received, that the proposal should be rejected and that a new RFP be issued to a broader base of prospective vendors. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTIQN: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval forthe request for permission to advertise an RFP for Parking Garage Management Services. County Attomey.(X) ~ , ' (. !"...-/ '~/ t..'~ Coordination/Signatures nderson ty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: [~ APPROVED-~[ 1 DENIED [ ] OTHER: Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing Mgr,:(X) Lf?- Originating Dept: Finance: (Check br Copy only, if Applicable) Other: EIf.119? 7 I l \.,.. AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO. C-3-B DATE: January 15, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Michael Rath, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Continuing Contract for Professional Surveying Services. BACKGROUND: The current contracts will expire March 23, 2002. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise an RFP for a Continuing Contract for Professional Surveying Services. County Attorney (X) /\ ./ if; . ;-;'/;' ,/ <.; COMMISSION ACTION: ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) Other. d'-- Originating Dept: Finance: (Check fiJr Copy only, if Applicable) Eff.1/91 '\.,..~ '...I DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 02-003 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@~@~~~~~@~~~~@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ TO: ¡ ::e;:=::~=:~~ ~.; FROM: DATE: January 02, 2002 I \. I SUBJECT: Professional Surveying Services Continuing Contacts Request to Advertise .. , .....,,,~ , .'1 Please advertise an RFP (Request for Proposal) for Professional Surveying Services. The current contract will expire on March 23, 2002. We propose to continue to retain three (3) firms. History: RFP #99-20 (attached). The purpose of retaining three (3) firms under contract is to meet all the survey requirements of the various County Departments and the Mosquito Control District. The County Survey Section has limited resources and personnel. They are not in a position to attend all the various needs of the other departments. February 1999 the Board selected three firms for Professional Surveying Services. Work authorizations were issued under the guidelines of the County Purchasing Manual. The firms were awarded projects on the rotation basic. The County Surveyor was assigned Project Manager for all survey contracts awarded by the County. cc: Ray Wazny, P.E., Public Works Director Don West, P.E., County Engineer File " AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO. C-3-C DATE: January 15, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Michael Rath. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-011, Air Stripping Treatment System BACKGROUND: On November 28, 2001, bids were opened for the replacement of the Air Stripping Treatment System for the Solid Waste Division. Eight hundred seventy-eight (878) vendors were notified, forty-three (43) bid documents were distributed and four (4) bids were received. The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Enviro-logical Solutions, Inc. (see attached memorandum). FUNDS AVAilABLE: Sanitary landfill Fund, Account No. 401-0000-239507 ~OOO EQ No. 02-156 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-011 for the replacement of the Air Stripping Treatment System to the low bidder, Enviro-logical Solutions Inc., in the amount of $33,795 and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: Pc] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney (X) /'\, ~ ~í'/ ~L Mgt. & Budget (X) atures -011'1,(,-1 -- j Purchasing Mgr.:(X) ¡t,? Originating Dept:: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eft, 1/97 , tn a:: w- Zo 0, -N tno ~~e Z:¡ãj ::):¡, 0°1- (.)(.)W W>W _I-J: (.)z(l) ::)::::IZ ...J°O . (.) - I- I- (l)LLe( O..J e::) a:: a:! <ce( 01- a:! \.,.. :¡ W I- (I) > tn I- Z W :¡ l- e( Ww 0::1- I-tn ~~ D-e D-_ -...J 0::0 t;tn 0::' -~ e(D- :¡ D- o M .. M @ - o o N ~ CO N 0:: W a:! :¡ w > o z .. e w z W D- O ..J ~ o l- e - a:! o o an Q') .... M~ M .,. o ~ - - .... .... ~ It) ~ o o . o M - a) It) ~ o o d o cø ...: cø ~ . (.) :!: tn (I) ~ w o::~ (.) 00 ~ . e - 1.1. (.) zl- W Z w::) tn - >5 z . uf (I) ° (.) 0:: - Z 0 ...J I- _ l- e( <C...J ~ (.) ~ ë U,_ (I) ::) (!) w~~ O::¡i o :¡ -...JI- ..J w~>U,(I)W- '...J o::!!?O::ëZ:J ~U,_ J::~~8~ <1-- ...J W S;D. a::~:¡WWz Iz:e <c W e ~ (.) < w~ w:e:¡:3e(C) I"') '¢ ti' C coW 1"-1- co:::l CD ti· a:: CI- wen U:c'¢ ¡::: en .. Ol-C zZW enW> w:e[j -:::Iu ZUWE <on:o ~CenC,) oCC": uãiiii.:! II) U,U,U,'C oooc::: a::a::a::~ wwwE CDCDCD-8 :e:e:e~ :::1:::1:::1(1) zzzp· '-' \ '-' "wi PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SOLID WASTE DIVISION MEMORANDUM 02-100 TO: FROM: Mike Rath, Purchasing Manager Leo J. Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager ~ January 4, 2002 DATE: RE: Bid # 02-011 Air Stripping Treatment System I have reviewed the bids received for the aforementioned and recommend award to the low bidder, Enviro-Logical Solutions, Inc., in the amount of $33,795. LJC:dls cc: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director - .. 0 c <: c c ~ C r( .0 Q) .¡;¡ c 0.. 10 :§- s: 0) Q C") .~ C'\ .EJ , C\ c en Q) C/) g c::: CI) :S ~ c , W N ~ ..... ~ .... Z 0 0 C 0 1:: 0 "'I- 0 ~ Q) CI) Cñ .... E Q) ~ 0 Q) :S . 0 ..... 0 E..!!1...Jo :!EN N Q)o..§:::.., 0 :!Eo:: - "t5@o~ O<c 10 :s., 0 ::::: .... C/)~oQ C¿ OW - .... Q) C\ C/) >- .... Q) Q) CD c: W >- C 0..000 IIJ 9. >< 0.. I- ...J W '- Q) c: C/) :E Z <Cw c ..::: 1... <0 Q) :J ~ 01- z c ~ ~ ~ .... Z w 'm ~ ~ ~ 0 en<c :E w I- > ;t:g-- z 0 ¡::¡:c :E 0 Q)o~æ :J LLo::l- 0 0:: c: C\ 0 OOen (J D.. Q)~oð~ (J W D.. § c: æ c: (J CLLW 0:: <C m C\ C\ <C O::I-~ .c:c:üQ) :t:::: Q) 1J) <cen" S:-E;'" .S '" ~ OWW CD m Q) 0 aJ~O:: á5E¡':::ü >-"<C ~(J) t'J)~ I-WC æ:s§¿ß zO::Z ~~.....J C:C:1:::~ ~I-W m m 0 c: OZC) ~ ~ .g. .~ OW<C <:( -- W:!E ~~Q)¡f _Il. ~Z:s Q) 0- .~ få .S :5 ~~ - - ...J" ~ .~ ~ a, .W '- .Q ~ C\ CD CO CD I- -00::::- en Q)..!!1COC\ _0..:>0 ~ c: m 0 ~.- !J)-; ::.."'.... CD:;:: (\] CO .S c: E 1J) ~ ~ - Q) '" I:! .~ ~ ~ (,) Q:: >< ~ '- 0.. Q) 0 .!!¡ .9- ~ CI) ~E:S~ ~ -~'-~ to ü ~ ~ ~ .E '(5 10 9 .... :J o ~~ Q) , CI) t"\ ex¡ .....J E Q) c: g¡ c ;:) 0 Q:: &¡::æ¡:: 0 a.. CI) :q: IJ.J :it a ¡:.; z w 0 0:: z ¡:.; ¡:: I- W :E z <C z I- Z W (J w 0:: 0 :E u: :æ <C ¡j) ~ ¡:: a. D.. :> :J en ~ w a :J ;::: c 15 w ~ ..., .....I \ ~ CI) S; IJ.J Q:: .. AGENDA REQUEST ...,-fEM NO. C-3-D DATE: January 15, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Michael Rath, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-020, Spruce Bluff Preserve Boardwalk BACKGROUND: On December 19, 2001, bids were opened for the construction of Spruce Bluff Preserve Boardwalk. One thousand sixty-two (1062) vendors were notified, twenty-one (21) bid documents were distributed and four (4) bids were received. The Central Services Department has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Custom Built Marine Construction, Inc. (see attached memorandum). FUNDS AVAILABLE: Environmental Lands-Capital Account No. 382-3920-563000-310065 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-020 for the construction of Spruce Bluff Preserve Boardwalk to the low bidder Custom Built Marine Construction, Inc., in the amount of $37,000 and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: lX] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney:{X) :5Q:/ Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget ()Q¥ 1It!JJr¡{!J{j Purchasing Mgr.:{)Q W Other: Other: Originating Dep\:: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eff.1/97 , i '- .. z z Z !D c: c: c: .., s: s: s: CL tD tD tD !D m m m 3 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 1\1 0 0 0 :J CL "TI "TI "TI III !;!! tD (") .... 1\1 ë 0 :"' C C') (J) c s: 0 ;:0 0 "t/ 3 m (") ~ (") c: ñi m s: <: m (J) m z z C -I 0 (J) ::! c "TI Cñ ñi -I C 2:! .~ tD c: -I m c .~ .þ. I\) .... .... o ~ "t/::E "TIC/) ::I:C/) (f(") 0_ :-Ie: 0(") -Ie: ;:or- :!!s:: 3:::r; C:C/) -1(") 0- ~-I ~O ms:: (J)" ~m ~" ~O ~() m;;tJ (J)m "TIS:: C:O '"-n!: >::0 , IJ] QZ 'Z (fC/) e: .m en "t/3: - "TI-I en 2:!» r- ,::0 m ~;;tJ 0 e: < 3: () m (f- < Z . Z » -I "TIm ~ m Õ C/) , Z m (") Z 0 Z » 0 m 0 - Z Z en en (") ;;tJ f) - 0 en Z -I (") ;;tJ Z e: en () ~ -I ~ Õ - Z Z () - Z (") . -(It -(It -(It -(It w w w W ~t.Ø ~r:Þ ~t:Þ ~ ~ en U'I ~ 0 Q 0 en Q 0 Q 0 Q Q 0 C 0 0 Q Q Q Q ....J o " m Z m o @ I\) .. Q Q " s:: o m (") m 3: IJ] m ::0 (")en m" Z;;tJ -Ie: ;;tJ() »m r-IJ] enr- me: ;;tJ"T1 <"T1 (")" m;;tJ enm en m ~ m IJ] o » ;;tJ o ~ r- " en ~ t.Ø I\) Q Q ~ IJ] -10 »» IJ]::O e:O r-O ~'T1C/) -(")~ 00r- Ze:e: enZ() ::r;-Iffi -< m(")(") ~00 ,s:e: IJ]S::Z - -I OCñ-< 0C/) 1\)- ,0 Qz I\)m 0;;tJ C/) , Miéhael Ratb :.Sid #Ó2'::Ó' . 'SprîJce Bìuff~r~serve Boardwalk. t ....I From: To: Date: Subject: Don McLam Michael Rath Tuesday, January 08,2002 10:35AM Bid #02-020 Spruce Bluff Preserve Boardwalk After review of the Bid's received, I'm recommending Custom Built Marine Construction, Inc. as the vendor of choice. They are also the low bidder at $37,000.00. Custom Built Marine has done work for St. Lucie County in the past ( renovation of Pepper Park Boardwalks), and the work done was very good. Funds available in account #382-3920-563000-310065 (Environmental Lands - Capital) Please take to the BOCC, if you need any further information let me know. cc: Robert Bradshaw; Roger A Shinn Page iJ · ,. ~ '-' AGENDA REQUEST ..."I ITEM NO. C-4ft DA TE:January 15, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [xx] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Daniel Mcintyre County Attorney SUBMITTED BY(DEPT}: Countv Attornev SUBJECT: South Hutchinson Island Wastewater System / Utility Easement Acquisition Project Proposed acceptance of a Public Utility Easement Mr. & Mrs. Turner - 61 Aqua Ra Drive - LSE #1A - Resolution NO.02-51 Hutchinson Island Corporation - LSE #2 - Resolution No. 02-52 Kersey Holdings L.C. - LSE #1 - Resolution NO.02-53 Nettles Island, Inc. - LSE #5 - Resolution No. 02-54 BACKGROUND: Please see attached background memorandum. FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the dedication of the proposed public utility easement, authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution No.02- 51.Res.02-52.Res.02-53.Res.02-54. and authorize staff to record the easement in the Public Records of S1. Lucie County, Florida. [x] County AttorneY:~ Review and Approvals COMMISSION ACTION: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] QTHER: [ ] Management [ ] Purchasing: { }originating Dept: [x}Utilities: [ ]Road & Bridge:_____ Finance: (check for copy only, if applicable) G:\ACQ\WP\Janet\SHutchWastewater\Agenda request for all parcels,wpd "'" '-' PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Property Acquisition Manager DATE: January 2, 2002 SUBJECT: South Hutchinson Island Wastewater System Utility Easement Mr. & Mrs. Turner - Resolution #02- 51 Hutchinson Island Corporation - Resolution #02-52 Kersey Holdings LC - Resolution #02- 53 Nettles Island Corp. - Resolution #02- 54 Attached to this memorandum please find a copy of a proposed easements for utility purposes granted by the above- mentioned parcels, to 81. Lucie County for use in the construction and maintenance of wastewater collection and conveyance facilities as an integral part of the South Hutchinson Island Wastewater Treatment System. The land encompassed by these proposed easements will hold a force main (existing) and pump station (existing). Wastewater from the above-mentioned parcels will be conveyed to a master pump station which will then pump the wastewater into the main forcemain which will convey the wastewater to the treatment facility. The existing pump station will be relocated and upgraded in order to maintain flows and pressures necessary for the efficient operation and integration of the existing facility into the new regional wastewater system. Ownership of this easement is essential to guarantee the ability to maintain the '- ...,I facilities in perpetuity and to protect them from being damaged by other activities not associated directly with the utility purposes. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the dedication of the proposed easements, authorize the Chairman to execute on Resolutions 02-51,02-52,02-53 and 02·54 and authorize staff to record the easements in the Public Records of 51. Lucie County, Florida. cc: County Attorney Utilities Director G:\ACQ\WP\Janet\SHutchWastewater\Memo Background for all parcels.wpd \.,., --' o II> ... WI . CJ) r--. C") .... UJ UJ u.. N 0 . ~ ~ '" Z ... 0 .. ~ (/) W 0 ... -' ¡:! :.i 0 ... .. 0 0\ ,... ,... LLi ,... oq I I ........ ........ ......... .......- -........ ~ _.... <19 .. --.... ~ ........ .. ........ ...... ~ 9 . a.. ~ t- \\\~~\\ I I iii ;, ,,"0 on Z ~a: ~ '. IL (f t:I~ III . I:L :t I- <,\\þ.~ \~'v o ,... 1'3~ . ~ ÐNIFSLC 'dMl ZL iOYe! iiS :10 lHYd .15310\ I '"', -' 1<1 ~ ~ ~ ~"1 ~ , I I , . ~~ 8.. .-,,:~~ elf ~..,;;ð .. ~¡¡ .ç~~~ -<'" -~~ /.',,:.<~'-- ! ~. ,_ .,<-",/:: ò" ,J ?~ ' I- _-.';-/0 :1 -,/' ~ , _.0:.::-0/ ¡¡ ~:",)l/ (I...! __..-!~. ):/',.<#,r' J '\1 ~ ' / ."..<#'. ,< /, ./' \~ i '.';??;:\ \r\ ''-' .,/ Þ ~~ ~: II"~\"'~~""'>'>'--' . ~ ,,-.,_ ~~ ~N B ~"ß ',.,/ · ./.. 'ö ,I' "S' D ,ø GJ~\~ i,," 'I .~ ",,~ . !' ,., 1/ · /~.~, " · '¡ .. I~ '''/ ~; !: <1'\,) = , ~ ~ .._ ~ r, '.. ~ r t.-ßlï i" 10i ßA'õ" ~~~." . .... " .¡:;. , <f). '" I / . '" '.. î"~ " ~ ~. 1':; .. . i !;' ,;~; I;¿Pi . ~ i '8 - ft" c. .' N~ ,/. ,F) .).. _,:;:; - · ~ <i u ~ ~ · . ~l ¡ ~ r,'/!l --:J...i::-:~ t~-- ~' :;1 ~~':' ,o.: ;'*" ¡¡ ¡ · r ' ~. ,. " ". ,. : ~ ... ..;i - JU ;1 ~ ~ tT J±~ " ., J 'j .. )ILT Il-'F ,: .~r ~ · '~I -¡-¡;H~-"'mr ~'Ir+: E-T : þ 'IIIif" ~.,. cf.J,; [-~ ~+,:::t : Ii III·j III ill'!li , ~ ~ ~,', ' -' .. I -;.- '+-: '¡C: III ¡; F\I' . _ c.:- +1/ T: ¡II,· f-rr' ,II - I~ .:T1 "'i~"tf; :~II ¡¡ì~ " l"'þ ~""'" fJ)' III . I.J~., ~-' ¡ III ~ ti -i- : ..I' 1 : ?"jll! ,f· .~ ç-;.-.I' III Ii 'M":.'.. ~. f-T t¥ 1f-:t : ""'UI ~'- ~ ~~: ¡ ,-!if UlJ~í~!lir.-I~1 IUI!-~" ~i~ ~~ III'¢~~ ¡II t" ~ ,,.....111 -""õn,m Þ UI II ~~: ,,,,,"III' .~'. ~-r b:~t~, ~, ~ ! III- ¡¡I~" III -r. ,:c.,;:::J ~, ~ F ~ 'fU '~j¡ ~r='~: ~J....... i~ T\.,' : '-- _ III ~ ~":.'.. J- ,H ~.~~~ : UJ' ~ ('" t Ih;{:!'~~1 :,""'I/i ~ .,.. ¡ -;-"rlt Ift'·¿'; ~ : '-UJ'r3 - \Þ8 /. 'IIi ' íÝ - ~, : . III' - .-::. lIrul +; 6-::" ~: ¡ '-- III l:-r ._'" ':;'¡ ~ ~ ,'~III ' .....;. i _. .;OO--! I - ~. <.: iii ¡ ~ L :-i-: ' M III . 1" . . ..{,' III T I ~ I ~ :_ 'III' -. J 1~ ~Ig 'tfj:-}-j IiI ..~:::. 'M_ .' ÐIt f-;-' ~ i - 'i .. UJ """-... 1~ rt ,] ± ?~-::: ~ ~ ~~-'. N , "JJI :-+., ~. ,'III .. :t.'~ ~~-i:\ : ...·111 ~~, .... ;8% ~'T~, ).. :!. '_III . " .. ...~~ . ~ I ...----¡¡¡-; --;,¡.m:' I. ~..' : ~~' -"- .A... ., .c~~.--' ,'----o-!II: ¡lJ, -" Itl I liD I·-~ 1'JOI>"'.:- ~ ~~ ~~~~ r-~~~,/r ". _~~' I :~~..,- ~.. __I 1 ~ T_ - - Ji~7 8, I' · :~ I! r ~~ rl I I J-.J ) ,~ ~~ ~~ f :~ ::-e. I ¡:; :: ~ ! .. I . I S J ~ ~ .- ~i U .. ! ~ ¡¡ i .. -.....;;¡ . : -1""1 z j ~~!!j .... :~Hi . . :: II i II ""II a:: ~!¡H~: .,! iii" UI I :Ii~~j . :!!~~ 'f I, y " ~ II ~:¡i =='1:11;, .... ~ì "i I}=o;U q¿>j) ·1'· I!: ::!! 18¡ .J 11; ~ f ~ Ii :}il J I '-' ...J This instrument prepared by Janet LiCausi under the direction of: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 PROJECT: PARCEL: PARCEL ID NO: South Hutchinson Island Wastewater Lift Station #IA - Turner 4511-815-0005-000/8 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, made this _ day of , 20_, by THOMAS W. AND DOLORES B. TURNER. his wife. whose address is 61 Aqua Ra Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR, and ST. LUCIE COUNTY. a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida. 2300 Virl!:inia Ave.. Fort Pierce. Florida 34982. hereinafter referred to as GRANTEE. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), to them in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby convey and grant to ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, for the use and benefit of ST. LUCIE COUNTY, the privilege and easement for the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement or renewal of a lift station in, under, upon, over, and across the following described land in St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described on "Exhibit A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. The Grantee may remove, cut or trim trees, bushes, and saplings growing upon or extending over said strip of land so far as may be reasonably necessary in the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement, or renewal of any of the above mentioned utilities or improvements. Grantor hereby agrees that no further improvements shall be placed within the easement defined herein, nor shall any improvements damaged or removed from said easement be replaced within the easement area without the express written consent of the Grantee herein. Grantor further agrees that no new improvements shall be placed near the easement or utility improvements in such a manner so as to prevent the access to, and maintenance of, the utility lines or equipment by the Grantee, it agents, employees, contractors or assigns. Grantor further grants to the Grantee, its agents, employees, contractors or assigns, a general ingress/egress easement over and across its driveways, parking, common or open areas, for the purpose of access to, and/or maintenance of, any of Grantee's utility lines and equipment. Subject to the provisions of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from and against any actions at law to recover damages in tort for money damages for injury or loss of property, personal injury, or death arising out of the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement, or renewal of said utilities facilities, and the equipment connected therewith, over, under and across said easement areas and caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of Grantee while '-' .,."I acting within the scope of his or her office or employment under circumstances in which Grantee, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant, in accordance with the general laws of the State of Florida. The undersigned hereby covenant and warrant that they own the said land and have the right to grant this easement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Grantor has hereunto set their hand and seal this day of , 20_, Signed, sealed, and delivered in our presence as witnesses: Witness Thomas W. Turner Witness Dolores B. Turner State of Florida County of On this before me, day of ,20_, personally appeared who is personally known to me whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of a credible witness to be the signer of the above instrument, and he/she acknowledged that he/she signed it. Notary Public Signature SEAL Notary's Printed Name Residing at: My Commission expires: G:\ACQ\ WPIJanetlSHutchWastewaterlTurner Easement. wpd 12.0' 2' CURB AQUA RA DRIVE 50' WIDE RIGHT-OF WAY 2' CURB LJ ..J « U V) "'.q- --n WOOD BULLETIN _ u ------ BOARD S8T54'32"W 32.05' ,\.Q~' z 0 -' -' ~ Ñ ° ø. LIFT STATION O. +> '1: (ELECTRICAL PANEL ~ ON TOP OF STATION) / PROPERTY LINE BANYAN TREE e N8T54' 32"E 32.05' VALVES FIN~ C:T BEARINGS BASED ON CENTERLINE OF AQUA RA DRIVE AS SHOWN, HAVING A BEARING OF S87'54'32"W, LEGEND IR&C 5/8" IRON ROO AND PLASTIC CAP P,OB POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT T.O,B. TOP OF BANK LB LICENSED BUSINESS RLS REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR THIS IS NOT A SURVEY LANDS SHO..,.. HEREON v.£RE NOT ABSTRACTED fDR RIGHT Cf' WAY, RESERVATIONS, AGREEMENTS, AND/DR EASEMENTS Of RECORD, SUCH INFORt.lA TlON, IF DESIRED, SHOULD BE OBTAINED AND CONFIRMED BY OTHERS THROUGH APPROPRIATE Tl11.E VERIFlCATlOH. C1l:CUlJ'EPPER & -U=TERPENING. INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2980 SOUTH 25th STREET FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34-981 561- 464-- 3537 CERTIFICATION NO. LB. 4286 POC OB IR&C RLS 1272 .- S87'54'32"W 78,42' BLOCK WALL (3.5' HIGH) U1 S 0JÑ ° (j) o +> ---J r'1 PROPERTY LINE ~ 2' WATER VALVE T,Q,S, (OT '0 BLOCK 3 DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3, PLAT OF RIVER WATCH, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 30, PAGE 19 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FOR A POINT OF REFERENCE, BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 3: THENCE SOUTH 87'54'32" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT -OF -WA Y LINE OF AQUA RA DRIVE (A 50.00 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY), A DISTANCE OF 78,42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01'26'47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 13,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87'54'32" WEST, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF AQUA RA DRIVE, A DISTANCE OF 32.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'26'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 13.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID AQUA RA DRIVE; THENCE NORTH 87'54'32" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF AQUA RA DRIVE, A DISTANCE OF 32.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID P ARCEL CONTAINS 417 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. 1Z./Z1 /r1 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION ST, LUCIE COUNTY UTI UTES REF. JOB NO, 9903-20A F,B"PG. 994.3,40- 4.3 DRAWN BY GLM ALCULA TED B RCL DATE 12/23/99 SCALE 1"=10' SURVEY NO, 9903,20 SHEET NO, 1 OF 1 I n~~9 '-" .....I ~, ~ ... C E ~ ~ ... , ~ U = ... III ~ = ... Q ø d 0- jh s Ib:: <C II 0- :;¡ ~ C6I> "H ~ ~ ~ f K C 1 L Þ Þ ~ ¡¡ ~~ ~!\ ,,' ~~ E ....:{" "'::;/ : ...--:.:...;,::::-..::;" .....I. ....... II =:.... ~:,- II / , "'-:::....t II............ ....-:;.:...::..:: e" .......)J. ........... II ........" ~..' ",- _",(1' ~..." b '" II....... ,.uv- , g ,,- .....,.¡pG\\ ~c. : ........ I~)o.. ~.\ .......\ I .......... .......... \ ." ..... \ '\ ~.... \ ......' " \ r- ~ ( "" " .......... \ " \ .. " ~Ið ''''', \........ '... ~ ", " , '...........,........: ~ /v i ,;, ;:;: o "'''' 9" "'''' 8~ 9~ i VJ ; " 0< = ~ -' I'J o ~ .- '" ... 8", 9" N'" ~: '" ~ , Ë ..., 0" z~ -' ' I'JN !Ii .. ,U'III -¿- o o ~~ ~: ê ."nl ~'i2 :::8 ~9 Ïnõ ::'8 -:ITTir Nil /$' -~IS ES -"\ .. . ...... \ \ 9- \ \ r; ~ \ .. \........ ;, ~ ~~ :<:.... ~::: ê ¡¡ ~ o o 9 ~; ~ri ~ N - - -.------ ;, ~ ;J ~ -....¡;;ij!! Q E ~ -!!~~Ji" Q .. x w -zo-.- o.~ !!!!~! Z - ñññ;;;;,¡; ............... '" o . ª~ C' i~ ~h ~-c ~~~~ ..~. l;;1 III;I;I;Q" W"""U ·Hi'· ~~!,,~~ ::¡ :~ "'!: "'2 "'Õ; ¡ -"'" ....... <;ð ., ·--M M ,.. oJ. ~ e !¡ I, II i I I I ~ , : ! Ii I I ~ 1\ 11 I ~ Ii , ~ I ! ~ " '-' ....,¡ ,. This instrument prepared by Janet LiCausi under the direction of: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney 51. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 PROJECT: PARCEL: PARCEL ID NO: South Hutchinson Island Wastewater Lift Station #2 - Hutchinson Island Corporation 4512-331-0002-0201 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, made this day of ,20_, by HUTCHINSON ISLAND CORPORATION whose address is 1000 Market St. Building 1, Portsmouth, NH, 03801 hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR, and ST. LUCIE COUNTY. a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida. 2300 Virginia Ave.. Fort Pierce. Florida 34982. hereinafter referred to as GRANTEE. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), to them in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby convey and grant to ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, for the use and benefit of ST. LUCIE COUNTY, the privilege and easement for the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement or renewal of a lift station in, under, upon, over, and across the following described land in St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described on "Exhibit A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. The Grantee may remove, cut or trim trees, bushes, and saplings growing upon or extending over said strip of land so far as may be reasonably necessary in the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement, or renewal of any of the above mentioned utilities or improvements. Grantor hereby agrees that no further improvements shall be placed within the easement defined herein, nor shall any improvements damaged or removed from said easement be replaced within the easement area without the express written consent of the Grantee herein. Grantor further agrees that no new improvements shall be placed near the easement or utility improvements in such a manner so as to prevent the access to, and maintenance of, the utility lines or equipment by the Grantee, it agents, employees, contractors or assigns. Grantor further grants to the Grantee, its agents, employees, contractors or assigns, a general ingress/egress easement over and across its driveways, parking, common or open areas, for the purpose of access to, and/or maintenance of, any of Grantee's utility lines and equipment. Subject to the provisions of Section 768,28, Florida Statutes, Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from and against any actions at law to recover damages in tort for money damages for injury or loss of property, personal injury, or death arising out of the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement, or renewal of said utilities facilities, and the equipment connected therewith, over, under and across said easement areas and caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of Grantee while \w ....I acting within the scope of his or her office or employment under circumstances in which Grantee, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant, in accordance with the general laws of the State of Florida. The undersigned hereby covenant and warrant that they own the said land and have the right to grant this easement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Grantor has hereunto set their hand and seal this day of , 20_. Signed, sealed, and delivered in our presence as witnesses: Hutchinson Island Corporation. Grantor Witness BY: Witness It's: State of County of On this before me, day of ,20_, personally appeared who is personally known to me whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of a credible witness to be the signer of the above instrument, and he/she acknowledged that he/she signed it. Notary Public Signature SEAL Notary's Printed Name Residing at: My Commission expires: G:IACQI WPIJanetlSHutchWastewaterlMarriott easement. wpd '-" ~; :f~~ /"./ ...¡ ~: ~ ;'] ì't ~ 1'. "'3- ./ 0 . i~ ,~- ~ I '" ~ o!; Ii cO -~ .-,- ~2 - ~ go ~~: 1 0~'- ;'í ~ ./ ..." < "oC ~ _~ \II .. 0 c. f~£ ~[~i CI G":l ~ '0 ~~ ~~ - !i.:I_ ~ ~, '. ..,¡ 'i ~ ~ g t ,'l~ .() ~~ .à'; 1 ~ ¥ r:~; ; .. i: ¡:. , i '¡" i i 1 ~ if. :f~ · i" ? g-.. ~ [:f · "::0 ~ f ~ g, Þ' ~~ · ,.,:: ::I~ · t:i · ~ i .t:; · 7 - ~ ~i!- i tt: -j ¡' ¡ i ~ š' ~ ~o !-õ · :: 2.dœe. i ~ ~z · .. ! : i 3 ,. l~o ~ ¡: Vi · f' OJ> , \. ~~ ¡ !. ~ .." 3 · r- I : 3- ~ 2 ",,,, J> ~ :~ J c>'" .0 Z -~:1-g, ;;is: 0.J Õ ~ . ",0 ~(¡J , ~ ~ i ~Q,~ .!:.. -i ~::o l>J 7 3 ' :; ~ ~ c ~o · ~ . . -00 ;:¡::;: ~ "'~ . , o. C)O l>J >t: , - : " .., , ~ r- : ~ .c: [!;j ;! · , N '" -0", · 7 7 . ;. ~ ""-< 0", en ~ ~ t " .¡;;-< ",(/I ~ t '" J> "'-< tr '" <.nJ> "'" .' ~ Z 0 c: .... r.r. 0 '" ~ j í': NI , æ~ ;;j J> r. ::d I ~. '" z ~ ¡II, Ii-~ .. 0 ~ -< :t "'0 . ... I " ·C>o :i I ~·æ·~'!~I:I;1 ¡~'I · "r: " I >j ~'" . · iaS,¡ "r I"! · , , I ! . J'" J> i i'~ ~i .ti~ ;.ï~· ,..; ~ · ~ I ¡ ;0 · Z n · ! i .' ¡ li~~I!m¡i: j~ii a ,..; > I . . -00 t1 ~ ~ II iõ ! ¡ ¡ 0c: i l>J C - .. H "'z ¡. ~ ~'æ!" (J] ~ , . ~ '" tj a)", i I!~' .~ i.1 .e. ~ · .'. " ã'í ~(/ .. ao ~ -I ~, ' ii~~~~'iiiii ¡Iii o. ~ H 3 . i;l¡:;¡; I I .1811' · ~ , , ! : i . ,(It- I .".' ~~'~n Iii 0 o . ¡ > :; 'i~" ~ I"¡ ·,t' z ~ ~ · " J sH 5 '~i ¡. ;;! i · I 1 · : ~ · ~ I-rl .' ,. · ~ · t ; I' i .; ~). 1~3 " · , II ~ < !!I~~":¿ii~! ii ~ ~ " ~ .. s .. i fl~~~I~ ~ I '" ~ ~¡¡;aI~QZ%Q:Z!:;:!ðæg ...nSil" '" -<!£~~"'''~2''''~,/: ~g Z ,. ~O" ":::O~¡/':ï!""'/: ::I Z 1'1'" ~ ar ",Zol'T1 N 12 ~~g~ 2 '/:",:Z!zo ."'0 -IICO Z ~ rt1~f'I'1~~M~.l:zì'~ ç¡:!Jo~ z .... :Zª;;jr-~ 'aI~o' "'~" '" z'" .. ~ '1'" zOSil" ':(g~:¡ . '" ;;t::aZN ON"" -<»' oõl"'" Ö ....¡ ::o~n~'1JªOIJ1 J:t:~ "',..... 0 '" 8È:-,8~ b~~~z:ï! '" 0" tJ:J '" 1.1101 "'tI~OO fTtM ~:Z!~<: c o o~2 ~",...æo... <: ¡;¡"'~::I 1:1) ~ f¡¡~~2r:: ~~~"Q 8ª;;§ '" :Z!~ 2~""šlr::o"'z n ;:¡ ,._ ëJç -< no~"" ,..~u"'V ~ z"'~ o 0,... '"C:;;j0 '" "c: ~ T'" :i!::O'" -<",::v " "C:VI:::Ð I:t; 1:S"2",-<,.:Z!"g~",% °Z°"'1l ",,,, O~"'£"',.o~ 5"'C:~ '!: ~~~~....,!Jt." o~l; :j S! z"'OO>-og~U1 ~SiI·:Z!:;¡ '" Ozl"'1 6ozI0":Þ~ .. :::aO 0 ~ g;-io!Õ\ ~-<!Õ\""'ln H~ .., ~o!;¡'","'ï::l Z '1Jxtn~....,,,, ~;-i~:þ~ 2"" r "',. '" ~"'~õ~c~~-<Eg-=~ ¡: ",...z g~~ª':(§~"'gåg':ï! [!-o Z"''' a z " ZN "~s;¡ ;;j~- %~n-"'''' "'....'" ~~":gz~~ J:.;-io ~!;¡r::r::-<",o ·z'" ~~12 zZI",,,"'~r; '" ~:Z!'1'1~,/: ~'. -<~~ ',. ,.... ",¡¡;~¡f,2:ï!'1¡:!J"'O,.... c:... -< :Z!~::'''' 8:ï!-< QO "'0 ~ ..,,»0 ",'" ;,. :<:ï!0 B",'" ::I 0 ~~:ï!"2¡: ~~ Z ,., 0··.... 20 ~~ . -< I ~ ...J ...., i (0 10-ccC 1-00012) 1. 10 AC \ \ \ \ \ .5éé SIt (1:!1" ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (031-0002 -000/5) \ I.n AC \ \ \ \ 'C"t ;, PARCEL NO. 2. A6 AC !i .~.. ~1' COAST AI. OONS"TRl.'m tH Së1-E\O.CX UN:' - . R'IIS , , , , , , (331-0002-020/1) , 2. 90 AC , , \ , , 'm (p-J\.. \ c l1, \J\\\, ' OCEAN DUNES' 1.69 AC \ , QI,4f' , - ._----.... , \ \ \ \ \\ \ "RACT I I '- . 5 \\ I II \ \\ I " ,- ,------, \ 'Ó ,-----\\ \ ": \ \\ \ If Q " \\ \ ~ ~ \ TR~ct \' \ '1: è;!..' <C ,\ \ ("'1 ~ \ \\ ~ ~ \ \\ -I \ \\ \;:=:::~\ , 1\ \ \\ \ " \ TRACT \\ \ J \\ \ \\ \ 1\ \ I, 0' ,'------', RoO' ........-\ \ \ , I (A511-A~~- . 0001-000/2). 10.01 AC (333-0001-000/4 ) I. 60 AC ~-, ,. \ , I , \ ~' ....' / tRAcr ,/ ~' 6...., \ , \ , I , \ , \ ' I,' ~, ~. \ 12 (451 HAA -0002 -000/9) 3. 66 AC (:3:5:;-0020 -oOO~) I. 17 AC (,' TRACT \ I \ -........ \....... " .ù Ke ~Se.. 'I µ, 0 \ d ~ 1Î9S . ." I I \ \ \ \ \ \ I . ,,' TRACT 2 ..,. "",03' II' \l... ---. SUBD!VI 5 I o t\ I N D E X SUHOIV1SIDH NN.I€ I. 0, PS I DRS pc, Y1lU, flEl SQ. "512-'rD1 I W1fDilJll IT 1Hl Sf. . N'LJ,' .. IIfn~ 1&1,1, UI I-DOl " . WIJcðwJU " '-« Sf,t, .. .'l1 W'IIS 11.1.. .. aNN) u .." t-81C " . '1P01'1Ll lIlT 'h(. &0 .. ~" hIO .!lI-e" " ), DŒ..... 1Utl! CØIJowIN,.., '·II·~.7n't """ .."" This instrument prepared by Janet LiCausi under the direction of: Daniel S, Mcintyre, County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 PROJECT: PARCEL: PARCEL ID NO: South Hutchinson Island Wastewater Lift Station #1 - Kersev HaIrlines. LC 4512-333-0001-000/4 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, made this _ day of ,20_, by KERSEY HOLDINGS. LC whose address is 9900 S. Ocean Drive #1007, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR, and ST. LUCIE COUNTY. a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida. 2300 Virl!inia Ave.. Fort Pierce. Florida 34982. hereinafter referred to as GRANTEE. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), to them in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby convey and grant to ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, for the use and benefit of ST. LUCIE COUNTY, the privilege and easement for the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement or renewal of a lift station in, under, upon, over, and across the following described land in St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described on "Exhibit A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. The Grantee may remove, cut or trim trees, bushes, and saplings growing upon or extending over said strip of land so far as may be reasonably necessary in the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement, or renewal of any of the above mentioned utilities or improvements, Grantor hereby agrees that no further improvements shall be placed within the easement defined herein, nor shall any improvements damaged or removed from said easement be replaced within the easement area without the express written consent of the Grantee herein. Grantor further agrees that no new improvements shaH be placed near the easement or utility improvements in such a manner so as to prevent the access to, and maintenance of, the utility lines or equipment by the Grantee, it agents, employees, contractors or assigns. Grantor further grants to the Grantee, its agents, employees, contractors or assigns, a general ingress/egress easement over and across its driveways, parking, common or open areas, for the purpose of access to, and/or maintenance of, any of Grantee's utility lines and equipment. Subject to the provisions of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from and against any actions at law to recover damages in tort for money damages for injury or loss of property, personal injury, or death arising out of the instaHation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement, or renewal of said utilities facilities, and the equipment connected therewith, over, under and across said easement areas and caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of Grantee while o SJ<ETCH '-' OF DESCRIPTION EASEMENT # lA -" 'MNDL4Ill. \I1LUGE BY THE SEA UNIT P.D. Ie, PC. J' COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY ~ ~o ~ 'Ò 7 o 30 45 ~ SUUTH UHf OF' 1MHOt.41ll \1LlAGE BY 'ß-IE SEA UNIT two P.O.C. P.O.B. S.E. CORNER Of WlNOMIll IJILL"G£ BY THE SEA UNIT two P,!. 18, PC. 31 N 9"5&'22" E 150.09' 54.113' \ DESCRIPTION 7, yÞ , 7 EASE"'ENT 1'A AN [ASEMENT FOR U,"UN PURP{JSES OVER: A.ND ACROSS A PORTION or SECi10N 12. TOM-lSHIP 37 SOUTH. RM'CE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUN1Y, FLORIO.... mE CEHTERUN£ or 'MilCH BEING MORE PARnCULARL'( DESCRIBED AS fOLLOWS: COMt.4ENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER or YIINOt.ftll. VIlLAGE BY THE SEo\. UNIT TWO, .&.5 RECORDED IN PLAT BOOI< II!, PAGE .}I OF 11-IE PUBUC RECORDS or ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FtO"ID,f.; THENCE N 1!19'5ð'Z2" E. A DISTANCE Of 2e..47 FEET; THENCE S 23'."3'" E, PÞ,AAlLEL WITH THE YÆ.STERLV RtGHT-or-WAY UHE OF STATE ROAD A-t-..... A Oln...NCE Of IHI7 fEET; TJ-IENCE N e9·~1I'22· E. A DISTANŒ OF 80.0Ø FEET TO THE POINT or BEGINNING or THE rOllOWlHG DESCRIBED CENT£RUN£; THENCE S 2':1"049'31· E, PAR....llfi. WITH s....'O WESTERlY RICHT-Of'-WAY UNE or STAT( RO~O A-I-A, A DIST....NCE OF 2ð4.J7 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REF'ERREO TO AS POIN'T "þ,-; mE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED UH[ BONG THE CENTERUNE or " 10.00 rOOT 'MDE UTlUTY EASU4ENT l 'nNG ~.oo FEET EADi SIDE: Of SAID CENTERUNE; 'mENCE FRctA SAID POINT" A", CONT1NU[ S 2J"049'31" E, PARALLEL WITH SAIO ~TERlY RIGHT-OF-WAY WI[ Of STATE ROAD A.-I-..... A DISTANCE Of ~.04a ftET TO TliE END Of' SAID CENTERUNE 'MTH THE EA.SEMENT L't1NG ~,oo FEET EACH SIDE Of' THIS DESCRIBED UNE; lHEHŒ RETURNING TO 5AID POINT -A"; THENCE N ðnll,i'22- E.. A DISTANCE OF 10.01] FEET TO THE TERMINUS Of' THIS EAS£Ue:NT 'MTH THE EASEMENT l'11NG 5.00 rEET EACH SIDE Of' THIS Dtsc- RIÐED UHE. THE IN1[NT Of' 'THIS EASÐ.lENT IS TO 8£ CENTERED OVER AN OISTING CIA PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN. 5 23'49'J1" 5,46' 89'56'22" E 10.00' (SOUTHERN BUl) a.R.B. 270, PG. 2M! SURVEYORS CERllF1CA 110N Is SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION complies with the Minimum Technical andards 'or land Surveyors In the state of Florida, Rule 61GI7-6.00e-I, o. ..t forth by tho Florida Boord of land Surveyors, Pursuant to norldo Statutes 472.027, and reflects¡ t/ the findings &~, 0/1 actuol field survey conducted on J V q , Signed \hls~ day of ~ 1994. Jo ~~rltt!(~qaæ ~orlda Certlftcatlon No" 2791 2. Reproductions of this mop ore not valid unless ~eoled wIth an Embossed Sur...~yor':!I Seol. Lands shown hereon were not obstracted by this office for Rights-of-Way, Easements of Record, Ownership, Abondonments, Deed Restrictions. Zoning Set-Backs, or Murphy Act Deeds. legal Dncriptlon shown hereon was prepared by the Surveyor. There may be additional restriction"! that ore not shown on this mop which may be found In the Public Records of this County. Underground foundatIons not located. SURVEYORS NOTES: 5. Bearings shown are based on the S. LINE OF WINDMILL VILLAGE .!!LWj:_~~~_ and assumed to b;;-Ñ 89'56'22"-£ and ore relative thereto, Elevations shown hereon are based on the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929. All elevations ~hown 7, J. hereon are based on ~______________ -------------------------------~--- 8. ______________ appears to be in Flood Zone _____ based on F.I.R.M. Mop ______ doted _____________. Unten a c;omparl:!!lon ìs shown, 011 bearings and dist- ances are the !'lame os C,'.lCULA'TED values 4. 9. 5. \v -' A<: I I. 8 r ..J al ·1 \!. r---- I: ..L ." , \ SEE SHEET 35/34SX V. :30 I. I \---~-----____L_____________ T. ....7 c. r ________ J ---- I r I I I I , I I rl.... DEII'f. or NATllT A;. J OESO\IIICl:S -cal,$, A:. I CONSTRUCTION SET I 8""" IN" I / I I , I I I I I I I nl ,,/ . , :'1 '!. ... ~ 'éi " \ \ \ " , I I I:: I: ¡" 1 '.. I '''.~-.... ,»= ..' " , o :'" t'" ~ r')O-S" - SECTION 1 See Sheet OS/2A ~ 2B '1 , 't '- ",\ I :....._--.~. \ . ,,,,,, \ \ L ,\, ---- ----G" .. . -....-- ) , -- \\ . 146 Ad. I (2+HXXJ1" ~ 0201'6 J . OCEAN ": TRS~;~~~ =1 PI.~T ~H[ I?" '/ /, . , -"'-¡ (2~:X;/9) lAND i" 5.46 A<: SWAMF . 7.65 At TOTAL" lJ.n Ac I SEE SHEET '-' ...I This instrument prepared by Janet LiCausi under the direction of: Daniel S. Mcintyre, County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 PROJECT: PARCEL: PARCEL ID NO: South Hutchinson Island Wastewater Lift Station #5 - Nettles Island. Inc. 4502-501-1598-000/6 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, made this _ day of ,20_, by NETTLES ISLAND, INC.. whose address is 9801 South Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR, and ST. LUCIE COUNTY. a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, 2300 Vin!Ínia Ave.. Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, hereinafter referred to as GRANTEE. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), to them in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby convey and grant to ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, for the use and benefit of ST. LUCIE COUNTY, the privilege and easement for the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement or renewal of a lift station in, under, upon, over, and across the following described land in St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described on "Exhibit A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. The Grantee may remove, cut or trim trees, bushes, and saplings growing upon or extending over said strip of land so far as may be reasonably necessary in the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement, or renewal of any of the above mentioned utilities or improvements. Grantor hereby agrees that no further improvements shall be placed within the easement defined herein, nor shall any improvements damaged or removed from said easement be replaced within the easement area without the express written consent of the Grantee herein. Grantor further agrees that no new improvements shall be placed near the easement or utility improvements in such a manner so as to prevent the access to, and maintenance of, the utility lines or equipment by the Grantee, it agents, employees, contractors or assigns. Grantor further grants to the Grantee, its agents, employees, contractors or assigns, a general ingress/egress easement over and across its driveways, parking, common or open areas, for the purpose of access to, and/or maintenance of, any of Grantee's utility lines and equipment. Subject to the provisions of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from and against any actions at law to recover damages in tort for money damages for injury or loss of property, personal injury, or death arising out of the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement, or renewal of said utilities facilities, and the equipment connected therewith, over, under and across 'said easement areas and caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of Grantee while '-" -' acting within the scope of his or her office or employment under circumstances in which Grantee, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant, in accordance with the general laws of the State of Florida. The undersigned hereby covenant and warrant that they own the said land and have the right to grant this easement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Grantor has hereunto set their hand and seal this day of , 20_. Signed, sealed, and delivered in our presence as witnesses: NETTLES ISLAND. INC Grantor By: Patricia Miller _Witness ITS, Witness State of Florida County of On this before me, day of ,20_, personally appeared who is personally known to me whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of a credible witness to be the signer of the above instrument, and he/she acknowledged that he/she signed it. Notary Public Signature SEAL Notary's Printed Name Residing at: My Commission expires: G:IACQI WPIJanetlSHutchWastewaterlNettles Easement- wpd LEGEND Ft PG. P.B, P.O,B, P,O.C. R/W PlS ~ ~~ O. ~~ q. "Y.: ...À Ö \ '*'"'\ \ .,> ~ \ 7.1. Y J PROPERTY LINE PAGE PlA T BOOK POINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF COMMENCEMENT RIGHT -OF - WA Y PROFESSIONAL lAND SURVEYOR NETTLES ISLAND BEAr'i 0ø(JB UTllJTY EASEMEl._ NETTLES IS~ RECREATION AREA AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF NETTLES ISLAND PROJECT R·B' 16, PG. 1 N64'30'51"W \ 2.50' '09"t \ \-\25"2.9 7' 26.6 "t 5'29'09 ÑÎ 27..2.26' ,0' '<'I\O~í (;"SO.A( '09"','1 SÎ?'~..9Î4' 22'J' POB Southwest corner of the \ Limited common use area ~ EASTERL Y R/W LINE \ 64'30'S1"W 2.S0' OC~ C::'UM BEARING BASE i SCALE: 1"=30' DESCRIPTION BEARINGS BASED ON EASTERLY R/W LINE OF STATE ROAD A-1-A AS SHOWN, HAVING A BEARING OF N21'13'S2"W A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LYING 'MTHIN A PORTION OF THE PLAT OF NETTLES ISLAND PROJECT oumOOR RESORTS OF AMERICA, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16. PAGE 1 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST, LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FOR A POINT OF REFERENCE, BEGIN AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE LIMITED COMMON USE AREA AS DELINEATED ON SAID PLAT, LYING EAST OF STATE ROAD A-1-A, SAID POINT LYING ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STATE ROAD A-1-A; THENCE NORTH 21'13'52" WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A, A DISTANCE OF 10.07 FEET: THENCE NORTH 75'29'09" EAST, ALONG A LINE 10,00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LIMITED COMMON USE AREA TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 222.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25'29'09" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 26,67 FEET: THENCE NORTH 64'30'51" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25'29'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64'30'51" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 25'29'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64'30'51' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 25'29'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 31,33 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LIMITED COMMON USE AREA TRACT; THENCE SOUTH 75'29'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 225.74 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD A-1-A AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID LAND CONTAINS 2680,00 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS, lANDS SHO"'" HEREON WERE NOT ABSmACTED FOR RIGHT or WAY, RESERVATIONS,AGREEIoIENTS, AND/OR EASEJ.IENTS OF RECORD, S\)CH INFORMATION, IF DESIRED, SHOULD BE 08TAINED AND CONFlRI,ŒD BY 01HERS 1HROUGH APPROPRIA 1E Tlll£ ItERIFlCA TlON. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY ;; . C~-/ e--'I~~.l:x> BY: :/\to .. u..u... _ ~. RICHARD C, LAVEN RE P.L.S. FLORIDA CERTIFICATE if 5209 DATE NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED, DATED AND Et.lBOSSED v.11H SEAL Of SIGNING SURVEYOR ~-Jr:CULPEPPER & -~= TERPENING, INC. SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION UTIUTY EASEMENT NETTLES ISLAND BEACH CLUB PREPARED FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY UTILITES CONSUL TlNG ENGINEERS &. LAND SURVEYORS 2980 SOUTH 25th STREET FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34981 561-464-3537 CERTIFICA nON NO, L.B, 4286 REF. JOB NO, 9903-20A F.B"PG. 9943,40-43 DRA'M-J BY GlM ALCUlA TED B RCl DATE 12/30/99 SCALE 1'=30' SURVEY NO. 9903,20 SHEET NO. 1 Of 1 '\ \./ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM No.~b DATE: January 15, 2002 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Robert O. Freeman Bond Counsel SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-57 - North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 02-57 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: ~] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: ~/ Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Public Works Dir: County Eng.: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff.5/96 '--' S SQUIRE v\NDERS LEGAL COUNSEL WORLDWIDE SQUIRE, SANDER~ DEMPSEY L.L.P. MEMORANDUM To: Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida From: Robert Freeman Date: January 9,2002 Re: St. Lucie County, Florida North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 The attached resolution amends Resolution No. 01-316, which authorized and provided for the sale of revenue bonds to finance the construction of additions to the County's North Hutchinson Island Utility System and the payment of Futures remaining due from the original acquisition ofthe system. The changes are technical in nature: (1) re-designation of the bonds as "Series 2002" rather than "Series 2001" and (2) incorporation of specific infonnation about the bond insurer and insurance commitment. The bonds are expected to be sold either the week of the 14th or the 2151 and to be delivered two weeks after sale. 8445v1 '-' ....I RESOLUTION NO. 02-57 A RESQLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 01-316 ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLQRIDA ON DECEMBER 18, 2001, AND ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION SUPPLEMENTING RESOLUTION NO. 92-167, OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTED ON JUNE 11, 1992, AS SUPPLEMENTED; AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS, IMPROVEMENTS AND EXTENSIONS TO THE COUNTY'S NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM AND THE SATISFACTION OF CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS INCURRED IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISTION OF THE SYSTEM; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF NOT EXCEEDING $1,900,000 NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2001, TO FINANCE THE COST THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE BONDS FROM THE PLEDGED REVENUES; MAKING CERTAIN COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE OFFICERS OF THE COUNTY TO PROCEED TO DEVELOP NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO SELL THE BONDS AT NEGOTIATED SALE; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO MAKE CERTAIN CERTIFICATIONS ON BEHALF OFTHE COUNTY REGARDING THE PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT FOR THE BONDS AND TO DETERMINE THE DATE OF SALE OF, AND THE DETAILS OF, THE BONDS, AND TO EXECUTE A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE MAKING OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO THE BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE OFFICERS AND OFFICIALS OF THE COUNTY TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER THE BONDS AND SUCH AGREEMENTS AND CERTIFICATES AS ARE NECESSARY AND DESIRABLE IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE, ISSUANCE AND DELNERY OF THE BONDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." TO REDESIGNATE THE BQNDS AS SERIES 2002 AND AMEND CERTAIN DEFINITIONS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners (the "Board") of S1. Lucie County (the "County") has previously adopted Resolution No. 01-316 (the "Original Resolution") referred to by title in the title above; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable to redesignate the Bonds as "Series 2002" and to amend certain definitions contained in Exhibit C to the Original Resolution based on the commitment for bond insurance for the Series 2002 Bonds; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: \...- ...I Section 1. Amendments to Original Resolution. The Original Resolution be and the same hereby is amended in the following respects: A. Section 2.02 of the Original Resolution is amended to read as follows: "Section 2.02 Authorization of Series 2002 Bonds. Subject and pursuant to the provisions of this Series 2002 Bond Resolution and the Original Resolution, special, limited obligations ofthe County, designated "North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002", shall be offered and sold in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $1,900,000 (exclusive of original issue discount and/or premium), for the purpose of financing the 2002 Project Costs and payment of Futures." B. All references in the Original Resolution to the year 2001 in connection with the Series designation ofthe Bonds, the definition of the Resolution or the definition of the Project shall be changed to references to the year 2002. C. Exhibit C to the Original Resolution, referring to certain definitions, is amended to read as provided in Exhibit C attached hereto. Section 2. Remaining Provisions Unaffected. The remaining provision s ofthe Original Resolution shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. SeverabiJity. If anyone or more of the provisions of this amending resolution should be held to be contrary to any express provisions oflaw or to be contrary to the policy of express law, though not expressly prohibited, or to be against public policy, or should for any reason whatsoever be held invalid, then such provisions shall be null and void and shall be deemed separate from the remaining provisions of, and in no way affect the validity of, all the other provisions of the Original Resolution. Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. 2 8441V 1/28902-00083/R.AMEND DESIG "'" "wi Passed and Adopted this 15th day of January 2002, at a regular meeting duly called and held. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLQRIDA (SEAL) By: Chairman, Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: By: Clerk of the Circuit Court, ex-officio Clerk of the Board APPRQVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney 3 8441VII28902-00083/R-AMEND DESIG ~ ...., EXHIBIT C DEFINITIONS "Bond Insurer" means Ambac Assurance Corporation. The Bond Insurer shall be deemed to be the Credit Facility Issuer with respect to the Series 2002 Bonds. "Commitment" means the Commitment No. 22412, dated December 18,2001, issued by the Bond Insurer to the County for the Policy. "Paying Agent" or "Bond Registrar" means U. S. Bank, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, as paying agent and registrar for the Series 2002 Bonds. 4 844JVI/28902-00083!R·AMEND DESIG ..", RESOLUTION NO. 02-_ A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 01-316 ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ON DECEMBER 18, 2001, AND ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION SUPPLEMENTING RESOLUTION NO. 92-167, OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTED ON JUNE II, 1992, AS SUPPLEMENTED; AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS, IMPROVEMENTS AND EXTENSIONS TO THE COUNTY'S NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM AND THE SATISFACTION OF CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS INCURRED IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISTION OF THE SYSTEM; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF NOT EXCEEDING $1,900,000 NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2001, TO FINANCE THE COST THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE PA YMENT OF THE BONDS FROM THE PLEDGED REVENUES; MAKING CERTAIN COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE OFFICERS OF THE COUNTY TO PROCEED TO DEVELOP NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO SELL THE BONDS AT NEGOTIATED SALE; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO MAKE CERTAIN CERTIFICATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY REGARDING THE PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT FOR THE BONDS AND TO DETERMINE THE DATE OF SALE OF, AND THE DETAILS OF, THE BONDS, AND TO EXECUTE A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE MAKING OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO THE BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE OFFICERS AND OFFICIALS OF THE COUNTY TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER THE BONDS AND SUCH AGREEMENTS AND CERTIFICATES AS ARE NECESSARY AND DESIRABLE IN CO\''NECTION WITH THE SALE, ISSUANCE AND DELIVERY OF THE BONDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE," TO REDESIGNATE THE BONDS AS SERIES 2002 AND AMEND CERTAIN DEFINITIONS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners (the "Board") of St. Lucie County (the" County") has previously adopted Resolution No. 01-316 (the "Original Resolution") referred to by title in the title above; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable to redesignate the Bonds as "Series 2002" and to amend certain definitions contained in Exhibit C to the Original Resolution based on the commitment for bond insurance for the Series 2002 Bonds; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. I ~ ...I LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. Amendments to Original Resolution. The Original Resolution be and the same hereby is amended in the following respects: A. Section 2.02 of the Original Resolution is amended to read as follows: "Section 2.02 Authorization of Series 2002 Bonds. Subject and pursuant to the provisions of this Series 2002 Bond Resolution and the Original Resolution, special, limited obligations of the County, designated "North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002", shall be offered and sold in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $1,900,000 (exclusive of original issue discount and/or premium), for the purpose of financing the 2002 Project Costs and payment of Futures." B. All references in the Original Resolution to the year 2001 in connection with the Series designation of the Bonds, the definition of the Resolution or the definition of the Project shall be changed to references to the year 2002, C. Exhibit C to the Original Resolution, referring to certain definitions, is amended to read as provided in Exhibit C attached hereto. Section 2. Remaining Provisions Unaffected. The remaining provisions of the Original Resolution shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. Severability. If anyone or more of the provisions of this amending resolution should be held to be contrary to any express provisions of law or to be contrary to the policy of express law, though not expressly prohibited, or to be against public policy, or should for any reason whatsoever be held invalid, then such provisions shall be null and void and shall be deemed separate from the remaining provisions of, and in no way affect the validity of, all the other provisions of the Original Resolution. Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. Passed and Adopted this 15th day of January 2002, at a regular meeting duly called and held. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (SEAL) By: Chainnan, Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: 2 8441 VI/28902-00083/R-AMEND DESIG '-' ....I By: Clerk ofthe Circuit Court, ex-officio Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM. AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney 3 8441Y IJ28902-000831R-AMEND DESJG ._-~ ..., EXHIBIT C DEFINITIONS "Bond Insurer" means Ambac Assurance Corporation. The Bond Insurer shall be deemed to be the Credit Facility Issuer with respect to the Series 2002 Bonds. "Commitment" means the Commitment No. 22412, dated December 18, 2001, issued by the Bond Insurer to the County for the Policy, "Paying Agent" or "Bond Registrar" means U. S. Bank, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, as paying agent and registrar for the Series 2002 Bonds. 4 8441V 1/28902-00083/R-AMEND DESIG ~ ~ ...." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C 6 DATE: January 15.2002 REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRjSENTED BY: ~6-~~ -- Ray Wazny Public Works Director SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - ADMIN SUBJECT: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners cost share the construction of a temporary sidewalk near Port St. Lucie High School. BACKGROUND: The City of Port St. Lucie has requested that St. Lucie County cost share in the construction of a temporary sidewalk to be constructed from Port St. Lucie High School to Walton Road. The sidewalk will be constructed on City owned land to improve safety for students at Port St. Lucie High School. A permanent sidewalk will be constructed in 2007 as part of the county's Lennard Road construction project. County Staff recommends that the Board approve funding of $1 0,788.50 to participate as a 50% partner in this project. Per FY02 Public Works CIP (Captiallmprovement Plan) funds are available in the amount of $50,000 for the Oleander Bike Path project. Staff is recommending that funds for this project be re-allocated toward the temporary sidewalk project from Port St Lucie High School to Walton Road and that the Oleander Bike Path project be funded in the next fiscal year 2002-03. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in 101002-4112-599330-4906 Transportation Trust/Constitutional Gas Tax Funds Oleander Bike Path project; funds will be made available in the appropriate program number for the temporary sidewalk from Port St Lucie High School to Walton Road project. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve funding of $10,788.50 to partner with the City of Port St. Lucie in the construction of a temporary sidewalk from Port St. Lucie High School to Walton Road. Staff also recommends reallocating funds forthe Oleander Bike Path project toward the temporary sidewalk project near Port St Lucie High School; the Oleander Bike Path project will be funded in FY 2002-2003. glas Anderson unty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED 0 DENIED o OTHER: II!! County Attorney: II!! Originating Dept: (Pub. Wks.) ~ I~ "d! t..... Review and Approvals II!! Management and Budget: 'jJtiJ .4f) ~, 0 Purchasing: o Other: ~~ ~. f r o Other: (Landfill) o Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: r" . ,.. c(: .J CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PUBLIC WORKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Serving With Excellence" December 18, 2001 Mr. Ray Wazny, P.E. Director Public Works 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Fl34982 Re: Sidewalk Lennard Road Dear Ray: Regarding our phone conversation yesterday concerning the construction of a sidewalk extending ITom the Port St. Lucie High School to Walton Road, I submit the following information. Our Public Works Department has this morning commenced construction of the referenced sidewalk. This construction will consist of installing a sidewalk 2275 ft in length, 6 ft. wide, 4 inches of rock base, 1 If2 inches of asphalt overlay and relocation of guardrail. The estimated cost is $21,577.00 as outlined in the attached. As a result of the community and school interest, we have designated this project as a "priority issue," and plan to have the project completed by the end of the school holiday vacation. As we discussed, since this is a county road and the perceived safety concern for students of the Port St. Lucie High School, the city has committed its initiative to construct this sidewalk and develop a partnership with the cOWlty for the pUIpOse of cost sharing for one half of the total cost. Please acknowledge your acceptance of this arrangement, so that the City of Port St. Lucie Public Works Department may arrange for the proper accounting of the expended funds for this designated project. I information that you may require, please call my office. "'---~ t3 c. c- OO UG II PUBLIC WORKS ÚEPARTMENT . 450 SW Thornhill Drive · Port St. Lucie, FL 34984-4370 · 561/871-5100 . 561/871-5101 · FAX 561/871-7397 , '-' II II II ...,¡ 0 ('I)O'\<:t lJJ ('I)('I)<:t 1-1- olriC\i «(/) CO('l)LO ::;::0 " LO~CO ¡:::ü " <:t- LO- " (/) II ~ ~ lJJ " II II " II II II II l- II \000 lJJ - II 0'<t0 üZ -::J II 0'\00'\ ct:ct: II ~~'<t II ~ Cl.lJJ II [L II II II II II " Ll.lJJ II II oct: II ::J " I-(/) " 0 -« Zw " >- , (/) ::J::;:: " ,...JZ " ::J«O " üC)1- II II II " \01''<t Ë \01''<t LO'<t'<t LO'<t'<t lriodcri Z lriodcri oCOr-< « OCOr-< LO r-< ::J LO r-< 0' ii I 0 (/) >-:..Jz ::J«O üC)1- LOLOLO 1'1'1' ZI- NNN :::::ill. NNN ('I)O'\'<tOO \0 ('I)('I)'<tOO r-< olriC\i-ilri r...: I- 000 CO('l)LOOO I' W ct:ct:ct: I[)~CONO'\ I[) lJJ 000 <:t- I[)- CO· N- ..... ct: ct:ct:ct: ~ ~~~ N I- ««« ~ (/) ZZZ I ZZZ II lJJ lJJ lJJ II ...J...J ...J II W Z I- 0 ...J « I- « ::;:: ü :,<::ct: I- W üO (/) (/) oct: W 0::« ~ '''' ro ::J CU I'<;/"r-<0c¡ 02 I :¡::¡::¡:ZlJJ ...J I'<:t~ ?; ::;::::;::::;::~> « -lJJ II Q) I- mI- II u WlJJW 0 0 II ïñ !:::!:::!:::o:2õ l- II c· '-' ..J BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS November 2, 2001 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR DOUGLAS M, ANDERSON Mayor Robert E. Minsky 121 SW Port St Lucie Blvd Port St Lucie FL 34984 Dear Mayor Minsky: , I am writing to you in response to Resolution 0l-R65, a resolution requesting the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County to provide for the construction of a sidewalk along the east side of Lennard Road between Walton Road and Port St. Lucie High School. In reviewing our records it was determined that the right of way detailed in Resolution 01-R565 is in Port St. Lucie ownership. Accordingly, city ownership will allow Port St. Lucie staff to proceed with sidewalk construction to mitigate the pedestrian hazard described in Resolution 01-R65. On October 23,2001, the Board of County Commissioners selected Kimley-Horn to conduct the Project Development and Environmental Study for Lennard Road construction. If Port St. Lucie decides not to move forward with constructing the subject sidewalk, St. Lucie County will consider including it in the design of the Lennard Road Construction Project. Please call me at (561) 462-1450 if you have any questions. Sincer y, · ,A~. 4--- o~íJ M. Anderson Co~y Administrator DMAlsm c: Board of County Commissioners Ray Wozny, Public Works Director Dan McIntyre, County Attorney JOHN D, ßRUHN. Disrrict No.1' DOUG COWARD, Disrricr No.2' PAULA A. lEWIS, Disrricr No.:\ . Fl\ANNIE HUTCHINSON. Disrricr No.4' CLIFF ßARNES, Disrricr Counry Adminis:-roror - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue . Fort Pierce. FL 34982-5652 · Phone (561) 462-1450 · TDD (561) 462-1428 FAX (561) 462-1648 · email: dougo@srlucieco.gov Oct 22 01 ~ ~4p HlILLlLtJtJl ~:15 Ct admin 5¡;1-3~~-4Ej94 4621682 CITY CLERKS OPFlOE ~ p. I PAGf 62 C04JMÇIL I'ŒJI 11 B [)'..r~ 10/22/01 R::;')~:"UT:ON :)1.-R 65 - A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR 5T LUCiE COUNTY; FLORIDA TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SiDEWALK ALONG LENNARD ROAD FROM V-JAL TON ROAD TO PORT ST_ LUCIE HIGH SCHOOL; PROViDING AN EFf'l:CTIVE DATE. vVHEREAS, that portion of Lennard Road b~¡'Ne~¡n Walton Road and the Port St Luci6 High School is frequently traveled by studlY-lts on ~¡f way to and from Port 5l Lucie High School; and WHEREAS, there are no sidewalkS,on the east side of Lennard Road within that area: and , WHEREAS, stJdents frequently utilize the east side of Lennard Road on their VJ?y to Port 51. Lucie High School; and VVHERE,1\S, the provision of a sidewalk in that area would gredlly increase the safety of the studentsa$ they go to and from Sd1001; and I,.".,'HEREAS, the City Council of the City of Port SI, Lucie has concerns about the '-" safety of the students because there is no sidewalk in that vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ST, lUCIE, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of tOe City of Port St. Lucie hereby requests and encourages the Board of County Commissioners for 51- Lucie County. Florida to provide for the construction of a side\...-a!k on 1tP- east side of Lennard Road between Walton Roa\! and Port St Lucie High Scoool to facilitate the safety of students aod the public traveling between W.ôlton Read and Port St Lucie High $chool. The City Council further requests that thi~ be daM at the ear1iest possib!1iI date. ....-, Section 2. This resolution shaH becQme effective immediately upon i1s adoption. f) (~ i~ - v.7~:;1 Post,lt" Fax Note Oat. /6 0 ~..~ L- 1 ., --=. ~::.~~~;: -;;"";-:_~~-:-:;::;:! ' ~ From Î-)¡1 ve ~ 1-'1 tV.s Co - -c.....¡;""'".,. ?~~N> 17 PI1one'i'¿~ ?-YJ3XI7 F.., '(,5-/6.52- -- L _ l :-:o-_.....~c _...._ ~_-c-::--.. L ~ -------=- Oct 22 01 ~'l5p 10/22!28C1 10:15 Ct admin 551-344-4094 4621682 CITY CLERKS OFFICE ..." p.2 PðJ'£ \:J3 . , RESOlUT!ON Q-F;, <jS PASSED AND· APPROVED by the Cit'l Caundl of the City of Port St. Lucie, ""'....-.0" Fiorióa, this 22nd d¡;¡y of October .2001. CITY COUNCIL CIl'Y OF PORT ST. LUCIE ATTEST: By: Robert E, Minsky, Mayor Sandra K. Johnson. City Clerk ~ APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roger G. Orr, City Attorney .... *" '..~" \,.J~ '" -.I St Lucie County INTERNATIONAL AIR ~FlCít/.Qa:$01 AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C - 6 DATE: January 15, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Airport Paul Phillips SUBJECT: Approve the professional services agreement with PBS&J for $91 ,800 for the design and preparation of construction dra\\ings for the fire suppression improvements at St. Lucie County International Airport. BACKGROUND: Last year, during permitting of the Marabella Hangar at the Airport, the Fire Department discovered that without enhancements to the existing fire suppression system at the Airport, further development of aviation related hangars would be curtailed. At that time the Board authorized the Airport to apply for and has since accepted $400,000 of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) funds to provide for the enhancements. This grant was matched with $100,000 oflocal funds for a project total of $500,000. This agreement with PBS&J provides for the design and preparation of construction drawings for the fire suppression improvements at the Airport. FUNDS AVAILABLE IN ACCT#: Funds of $500,000 are available in the Airport Improvements other than Buildings account (140316-4220-563000-400). PREVIOUS ACTION: Board approved the FDOT Joint Participation Agreement on May 8,2001. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the professional services agreement with PBS&J for $91,800 for the design and preparation of construction drawings for the fire suppression improvements at St. Lucie County International Airport. Reviews & APpr~vals ~ County Attorney: I OMBJ-? m\r{ì 1f__turch~sin Originating Dept: It Other: Other: Finance:(Check fì r Copy only, if applicable) -- COMMISSION ACTION: NAPPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: '-' ..."", PBSI RECEfV'Ëïf OCT 3 0 Z001 An employee-owned company Transmitted Via: FedE:dFacsimíle Äiì4 ~ü'~~r~ S I. L.UCIE. COUNT"Y, FLOI~IDA October 26, 2001 Mr. Paul A. Phillips Airport Director St. Lucie County International Airport 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 RE: Proposal for Professional Services for the Design and Preparation of Construction Drawings for the Fire Suppression Improvements for the St. Lucie County h~ternational Airport. File: .. 88-6ES.OI #1 Dear Mr. Phillips: PBS&J is pleased to present, herein, a Proposal for Professional Services for the design and preparation of construction drawings for the fire suppression improvements for the St. Lucie County International Airport (SLCIA). The improvements will consist oftwo phases: . Phase 1: . Phase 2: Storage Tank and Fire Pumps 4,400 linear feet of waterline Based upon previous meetings and discussions with the Utilities Department, as well as the Memorandum from Fire Marshall Emerson dated October 10, 2001, PBS&J is proposing the following Tasks be completed to implement Altemative 4 of our Water System Analysis for the St. Lucie County International Airport dated May 2001: Scope of Work Task 1 Project Control Task 1.1 Proiect Meetings PBS&J anticipates holding 5 meetings through the duration of the project including a project kick- off meeting, a 30% design review meeting, 60% design review meeting, a 90% design review meeting, and a final design review meeting. Task 1.2 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Quality Assurance and Quality Control will be performed in accordance with PBS&J's QCAP procedure. The guidelines for this procedure are available for your review upon request. 2001 Northwest 107th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33172-2507 · Telephone (305) 592-7275 · www.pbsj.com '-' ....; Mr. Paul k Phillips St. Lucie County International Airport Page 2 10/26/01 Task 2 Preliminary Design Task 2.1 Survey PBS&J will provide a detailed site survey of the tank site and 4,400 ft. long x 25 ft. wide route survey for the proposed waterline. The survey will includl':: topography and underground utilities as marked by the appropriate utility department agents. The survey will be provided in digital form as CADD drawing files and on 24" x 36" bond paper at the following scale: 1 "=40'. Task 2.2 Geotechnical PBS&J will provide three (3) soil borings and a geotechnical report. One soil boring will be to a depth of 60 feet and two will be 30 feet deep. The borings will be located at the proposed site of the storage tank. Task 3 Final Design Task 3.1 Drawings and Specifications PBS&J will prepare drawings and specifications (Contract Documents) for the project in accordance with the St. Lucie County Utility Department and the appropriate regulatory agencies. Drawings will consist of a cover sheet, general notes and legend, waterline plan and profile sheets, storage tank plan, sections and details, pump station architectural plans, elevations and details, structural plan, section and details, mechanical plans, sections and details, electrical plan, one-line and riser diagrams, and control wiring diagrams. All drawings will be in 24"x 36" format. It is anticipated that 17 drawings will be required in total. Task 3.2 Construction Cost Estimate PBS&J will prepare an estimate of probable costs, as defined by the American Association of Cost Estimators prior to permitting. Task 4 Permitting Assistance PBS&J will prepare the necessary permit applications on behalf of the St. Lucie County Utilities Department. As part of this task, PBS&J will respond to Requests for Information from the permitting agencies. PBS&J will also provide plans and complete dry-run permitting of the project where applicable. It is assumed, herein, that any and all permit and/or permit application fees will be the responsibility of the St. Lucie County Utilities Department. I:\ENV\ WM\ WM\S tLucie\ImprovementslCorrespondence\ImprovementProposaI I 0-26-0 I .doc PBSJ '-' ..."" Mr. Paul A. Phillips St. Lucie County International Airport Page 3 10/26/0 I Task 5 Construction Phase Services It is assumed, herein, that overall construction management services for the project are not a part of this contract, that the Construction Manager will be the primary and sole point of contact with the Construction Contractor and that PBS&J will provide engineering services during construction as follows: Task 5.1 Pre-Bid Services PBS&J will attend one pre-bid conference for the project and respond to pre-bid RFIs as required. Task 5.2 Shop Drawings and Technical Submittals It is assumed, herein, that the Construction Manager will receive and log shop drawings and technical submittals required to be submitted by the Construction Contractor and will transmit submittals to PBS&J for review. PBS&J will review and return submittals to the Construction Manager within 10 working days of receipt. The review "ill be in accordance with PBS&J specifications and for conformance with the design concept and compliance with the Contract Documents. Task 5.3 Request for Information PBS&J will issue technical interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents, along \\ith associated support materials, as requested by the Construction Manager. These interpretations "ill be rendered and a response prepared and submitted tot he Construction Manager within one week of the Construction Manager's RFI. Task 5.4 Site Visits PBS&J will visit the project two times at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction, to observe the progress and quality of work. It is assumed, herein, that PBS&J will not provide daily inspection or construction oversight. Task 5.5 As-Builts PBS&J will certify the project based on red-lined drawings provided by the Contractor and sealed by a Florida Registered Professional Land Surveyor. ¡:\ENVI WM\ WM\StLucie\lmprovements\Correspondence\lmprovementProposall 0-26-0 i.doc ~ '-' ....,¡ Mr. Paul A. Phillips St. Lucie County International Airport Page 4 10/26/0 I Deliverables Task 2.2 Task 2.3 Task 3.1 Task 3.2 Task 4 Survey Geotechnical Drawings and Specifications 1 Digital Copy, 1 Hard Copy 1 Report 35 Copies: 5 30%, 5 60%, 5 90%, 5 Permitting, 15 Final 1 Digital Copy, 1 Hard Copy Approved Dry-Run Plans & Permit Application Construction Cost Estimate Permitting Assistance Schedule and Budget Schedule PBS&J is proposing the following schedule for this project: Task Description Approximate Durationttom NTP Survey 4 weeks Geotechnical (will be conducted concurrently with other tasks) Drawings and Specifications 12 weeks 30% Design Review 2 weeks 60% Design Review 2 weeks 90% Design Review 2 weeks Final Design Review 2 weeks Task 4 Permitting 8 weeks Task 3.2 Construction Cost Estimate (with Final Design Submittal) Total Pre-Construction Task 2.2 Task 2.3 Task 3.1 32 weeks Budget PBS&J is proposing the following Lump Sum Fees for professional labor hours and direct expenses to complete the Tasks discussed above. Phase 1: Phase 2: Total: $54,300 $37,500 $91,800 I :\ENVI WM\ WM\StLucie\ImprovementsICorrespondence\ImprovementProposall 0-26-0 I.doc ~ \w ...,; Mr. Paul A, Phillips 51. Lucie County International Airport Page 5 10/26/01 Exclusions and Assumptions . Construction Management Services will not be required We appreciate the opportunity to submit, and look forward to meeting with you to discuss this proposal. If you have any questions, please call me at (800) 597-7275 ext. 218. Sincerely, P~S&J ~- Patricia A. C Program Mana Water/ Wastewater Program PAC/pac c: William Blazak Director St. Lucie County Utilities Department 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Ron Ash, PBS&J J: IENVI WM\ WM\StLuciell mprovementslCorrespondencel1 mprovemcntProposall 0-26-0 I ,doc PBSJ '-' ....J WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS PQRTHE ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIQNAL AIRPQRT PBS&J PROJECT NUMBER 01-1234.01 MAY 2001 '-' ....I Table of Contents Section Page 1 Introduction.... ........... ............. ................... .................................................... ...... ............... 1-1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Purpose ................. ....... ...... ....... ......... ............. ....... ...................................................... 1-2 2 Existing and Future Conditions ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Existing Facilities, Equipment and Structures ........................................................... 2-1 2.2 Existing Potable and Fire Demands........................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Existing Potable Demand................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.2 Existing Fire Demand ........................................................................................ 2-4 2.3 Future Potable and Fire Demands.............................................................................. 2-4 2.3.1 Future Potable Demand...................................................................................... 2-4 2.3.2 Future Fire Demand ........................................................................................... 2-5 3 Water System Analysis and Recommendations ................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Existing and Future Condition Computer Models ..................................................... 3-1 3.2 Model Results ............................................................................................................ 3-1 3.3 Recommendations...................................................................................................... 3-4 ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 \w ....", Table of Contents Appendices Appendix .A.................................................................................... Hydrant Maintenance Reports Appendix B .............................................................................................................. Model Results Figures Figure 2-1 Existing System - Major System Components ........................................................ 2-2 Figure 3-1 Recommended System - Major System Components.............................................. 3-5 Tables Table 2-1 Existing Potable Water Demand................................................................................ 2-3 Table 2-2 Future Potable Water Demand .................................................................................. 2-5 Table 3-1 Analysis Summary .................................... ................................................................. 3-3 ST. LUCIE COUNTY rNTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 ii '-' ....,¡/ Section 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background The St. Lucie County International Airport (the airport) is one of the largest employers in St. Lucie County (the County). The County owns and operates a water distribution system that is located within the airport property boundaries. The water system serves the airport terminal and the on-site fixed base operators that are tenants on the airport site. The airport is located adjacent to St. Lucie Boulevard in northeast St. Lucie County. The main portion of the airport water distribution system was originally constructed in 1984, and the system was extended in 1992. Water for the system is purchased from the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) through a bulk water user agreement. In addition to the water supplied by the FPUA, there are several water users who are connected to private wells. These systems are not interconnected tot the main portion of the airport system. The County contracts maintenance of the system to a private contractor. The contractor is responsible for the overall system operation that includes making system repairs when needed as well as exercising key components such as hydrants and valves. Sufficient water system capacity and fire flow protection must be available in order to accommodate anticipated expansion at the airport. ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 0\-1234.01 1-1 '-" ...., Section 1.0 Introduction 1.2 Purpose This purpose ofthis project is to analyze, utilizing a steady-state hydraulic model, the existing water distribution system within the airport to determine the adequacy of the system based on existing and future demands, including fire flow requirements. This report is intended to outline the specific modeling parameters based on S1. Lucie County Utility Department standards, Utility Department field investigations and recommendations, PBS&J site visits and recommendations, and proposed airport expansions. ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNA TIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 1-2 ~ ...." Section 2.0 Existing and Future Conditions 2.1 Existing Facilities, Equipment and Structures Currently, there are two water mains that feed the St. Lucie County International Airport (SLCIA): one is a 12" main located on the east side of the airport and the other connection point is an 8" main on the west side of the airport. Both of these water mains connect to Fort Pierce Utility Authority (FPUA) mains. The main lines within the airport consist of 8 and 12-inch lines. Qther system components include water lines ranging in size from %-inch to 6-inch, valves, meters, fire hydrants and other miscellaneous appurtenances. The major system components are shown in Figure 2-1. 2.2 Existing Potable and Fire Demands 2.2.1 Existing Potable Demand Existing potable demands were based on meter data provided by the airport staff for October 2000 through February 2001 from the 14 existing water meters located within the airport. An average demand was calculated based on this data and this average demand was utilized as the existing potable demand. This data is provided in Table 2- I. ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNA TIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 2-1 "" ...., Section 2.0 Existing and Future Conditions Table 2-1 Existing Potable Water Demand ble Aviation 16,780 19,790 25,460 15,336 17,290 18,931 0.44 ircraft Ground 950 1,220 1,080 1,040 1,470 1,152 0.03 ircraft Paint 24,130 34,800 35,600 27,290 36,890 31,742 0.73 irport erminal 57,800 71,800 76,200 60,000 74,100 67,980 1.56 ir Traffic ontral 12,000 11,900 10,900 6,800 14,500 11,220 0.26 15,300 42,600 42,300 33,700 14,200 29,620 0.68 76,690 2,290 910 330 8,900 17,824 0.41 P Air Center 22,610 26,520 31,580 35,810 35,510 30,406 0.70 et Service enter 15,800 17,820 15,650 14,340 28,150 18,352 0.42 2,630 2,090 1,080 270 1,060 1,426 0.03 10,000 15,400 12,400 10,200 16,300 12,860 0.30 16,540 16,730 112,410 95,370 24,730 53,156 1.22 55,550 132,220 70,240 71,410 82,355 1.91 ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. OI-l234.01 2-3 '" ..."", Section 2.0 Existing and Future Conditions 2.2.2 Existing Fire Demand The existing fire demand was determined based on the existing building square footages, usage and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards. 2.3 Future Potable and Fire Demands 2.3.1 Future Potable Demand Future potable demands were projected based on anticipated expansion information provided by airport staff and their pla.nn).ng documents, utilizing existing meter data to estimate future demands based on building usage and area. The proposed buildings included in these additional demands are summarized in Table 2-2. ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 2-4 '-" ..., Section 2.0 Existing and Future Conditions Table 2-2 Future Potable Water Demand Average Potable Estimated Water Demand, Facility Description Square Footage gpm ainting Hanger aintenance Hanger ir Craft Manufacturing anger esearch, Development and Manufacturing useum aintenance Hangers anger aintenance Hanger Storage Hangers ainting Hanger irport Maintenance Facility anger irportlFirelRescue 40,000 35,000 60,000 12,000 70,000 35,000 22,000 8,000 12,000 14,400 12,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 2.57 1.45 0.90 0.77 1.04 0.92 1.41 0.51 0.77 0.93 0.77 0.22 0.64 0.11 2.3.2 Future Fire Demand The future fire demand was estimated based on proposed expansion information provided by airport staff. This information consisted of proposed building locations, square footages, usage and type of fire suppression system planned. ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNA TIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 2-5 \.t "wII ., Section 2.0 Existing and Future Conditions Based on NFP A 409 StaJ1dard on Aircraft Hangers, four different type of possible fire suppression systems were considered as possibilities for future hangers: foam-water, low expansion foam, high expansion foam and closed head foam-water. The maximum fire flow demand, both in tenus of flow rate and volume of water, calculated from the four methods was utilized for this analysis. ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 2-6 '-' ...., Section 3.0 Water System Analysis and Recommendations 3.1 Existing and Future Condition Computer Models A steady-state hydraulic model of the water system was prepared using Cybernet Version 3.1. The model contained the following significant assumptions: I. All valves within the system are fully open, 2. The pressures at the two tie-in locations was estimated based on the static pressure measured at the ten fire hydrants located within the airport (see Appendix A for test data). For the existing condition, the worst-case fire demand (based on demand and location of existing buildings) was added to the model. Qnce the existing system model was established, future conditions were introduced into the model. Again, based on the planned building locations and fire flow demands, a worst-case fire demand was added to the future model. 3.2 Model Results 3.2.1 Existing System The existing system model run indicated that even under current conditions, the system is deficient with regard to providing adequate fire flows. In order to meet the NFP A standards, storage and booster pumps would be required to supplement the existing system. These components were added to the existing model in order to meet existing fire flow demands. The model resul_ts for existing conditions with the additional fire suppression components are included in AppendIx B. 3.2.2 Future System The increased fire flow requirements associated with the planned expansion produced greater system deficiencies under the conditions modeled in the future scenario. The results fÌ'om this model are included in Appendix B. ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 3-1 '-', .., Section 3.0 Water System Analysis and Recommendations 3.2.3 Alternative Analysis In order to correct the deficiencies identified under future conditions, five different scenarios were modeled and are discussed below and summarized in Table 3-1. Under each scenario, the maximum flow and duration that could be supplied by the proposed system \vas estimated and the additional fire suppression required via storage and booster pumps was calculated. The model results under each of these scenarios are included in Appendix B. 3.2.3.1 Alternative 1 This alternative considered only the addition of a ground storage tank and fire suppression booster pumps. 3.2.3.2 Alternatives 2, 4 and 5 In order to decrease system losses and increase system capacity, the existing 4,400 linear feet of8- inch line which runs from the west connection at Hammond Road to the existing 12-inch line running north-south on Aviation Way was replaced in the model; · In Alternative 2 with a 12-inch, · In Alternatives 4 and 5 with 12-inch and 16-inch lines, respectively, and an additional hydrant. 3.2.3.3 Alternative 3 This alternative considered only the addition of a ground storage tank, fire suppression booster pumps and an additional fire hydrant. ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 3-2 \-' "",., Section 3.0 Water System Analysis and Recommendations Table 3-1 Analysis Summary Scenario Additional Fire Maximum Flow Available Suppression Demand from Municipal Required (gpm) System (gpm) (gpm) Storage Required (gallons) New Piping (LF) Total Estimate Cost Existing 6,500 1,750 4,750 213,750 Alternatives 1 Future with new ' 8,000 1,880 6,120 275,400 $511,000 storage tank and pumps Future with new 2 12-inch main, 8,000 2,630 5,370 241,650 4,400 $740,000 storage tank and pumps Future with new 3 fire hydrant 8,000 2,200 5,800 261,000 $500,000 storage tank and pumps Future with new 12-inch main and 4 new fire hydrant 8,000 4,000 4,000 180,000 4,400 $657,000 storage tank and pumps Future with new 16-inch main and 5 new fire hydrant 8,000 4,140 3,860 173,700 4,400 $777,000 storage tank and pumps The estimated costs provided in Table 3-1 include construction, engineering and a contingency. ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 3-3 ... ....l 'wII Section 3.0 Water System Analysis and Recommendations 3.3 Recommendations The lowest cost alternative that meets the future needs of the airport is Alternative 3 that includes a new fire hydrant, a 26 1 ,OOO-gallon storage tank, and fire suppression booster pumps at an estimated cost of $500,000. Figure 3-1 is a schematic representation of the Recommended System's Major Components. ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERi"lA TIONAL AIRPORT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Project No. 01-1234.01 3-4 -' 1 'w' AGENDA REQUEST """" ITEM NO. C-7 DATE: Jan. 15,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Paul Julin Project Manager,Central Services SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Central Services SUBJECT: Work Authorization for Edlund & Dritenbas Architects BACKGROUND: Through Continuing Contract, Edlund & Dritenbas Architectural & Engineering Firm has worked with staff in preparing preliminary drawings and estimated cost for construction ofthe Administration Building Addition. This addition will consist of 3,550 sq. ft. on thefirstfloor, 3,741 sq. ft. on the second floor and a 2,200 sq. foot. second floor addition over the existing Tax Collectors Office. To unify the architectural theme of the existing first floor with the new construction, Edlund & Dritenbas will provide the architectural elevations. (Please see attached) FUNDS AVAIL: 310003-1930-562000-16008 (Impact Fees-Other Public Bldgs) $300,000.00 PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board of County Commissioners approved the use of Impact Fees for this project on December 11th, 2001, Item No. C-12-a. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners grant approval to use the services of Edlund & Dritenbas for the construction of the Administration Building in the amount of $176,308.00 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Work Authorization when prepared by the County Attorney. MISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: nderson nty Administrator Co"," A"'''" ;¿* Originating Dep{ (þ--- Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicabie) ElL 1/97 H:\Agenda-Admin Addition.wpd ,. '- ~ .. §.; .:., ~:: ~:: ~~~ ~.: :-;'. ~~ -:.; i ~~ ~~ ~~ ::a ~~ ;:~ :* ::::: .:::: ::::::;:-:=:8";:;:;:;:;:;"$:::~8;:;:;:~;:;-~:::;~:;~:::;8m~:~:~:~~:;:;:;:;:;:;:~:::~~":;~:;:;::8;::8~~¡â DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM TO: Board of county Commissioners FROM: paul Julin, project Manager THROUGH: Roger Shinn, Director Central services DATE: January 9, 2002 SUBJECT: work Authorization for Edlund & Dritenbas Architects ******************************************************************* BACKCROUND:Through continuing contract, Edlund & Dritenbas Architectural & Engineering Firm has worked with Staff in preparing preliminary drawings and estimated cost for construction of the Administration Building Addition. This addition willconsist of 3,500 sq ft on the first floor, 3,741 sq, ft on the second floor and a 2,200 sq. foot second floor addition over the existing Tax Collectors Office. TO unify the architectural theme of the existing first floor with the new construction, Edlund & Dritenbas will provide the architectural elevations. (Please see attached) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners grant approval to use the services of Edlund & Dritenbas for the construction of the Administr;3tion Building in the amount of $176,308-00 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Work Authorization when prepared by the County Attorney.