Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 02-05-02
) '- ...." FEBRUARY 5, 2002 7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOIvŒ GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission ívill discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 ."1..1\1., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come fonvard, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the COUilty Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone í\ith a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting sholùd contact the St. Lucie COUilty Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.stlucieco.gov . '-' ..J John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 Dis trict 5 AGENDA February 5, 2002 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ,1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held January 22,2002. frPproM 2. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS / ANNOUNCEMENTS .A. B. c. Resolution No. 02-63 Proclaiming the Month of February, 2002 as "Children's Dental Health Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida. ~~~\-t:.htfl1Jfl Announcement / There will be a Joint Meeting with the City of por~~.~~le ~. on March 14, 2002 at 3:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. ¡W5U'1 Announcement / The Fort Pierce City Commission and Board of countYQ8~ Commissioners will hold a joint workshop to review the status of the Port I '-(~ D) Master Plan on February 19, 2002 at 1:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. UA-- Î{ D. Announcement / The Florida Department of Environmental Protection will hold a public workshop for Avalon State Park and Ft. Pierce Inlet State Park on Wednesday, February 20,2002 at 7:00 pm at the St. Lucie County Civic Center, Room 101, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida to present the proposed land management plans for these parks to the public. E. Announcement / The Florida Department of Environmental Protection will hold a public workshop for Savannas Preserve State Park on Wednesday, February 21, 2002 at 7:00 pm at the Port St. Lucie Parks and Recreation Community Center, 2195 Southeast Airoso Blvd., Port St. Lucie, Florida to receive comments from the public regarding management and land uses for the Savannas Preserve State Park before the development of a new management plan for the park. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boarll at these meetings will need a record of the proceedmgs and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any partv to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any' party to the proceedìngs' will be granted tbe opportunity to cross-examine any indiVIdual testifying during a hearing upon request. Añvone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1418 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior fo the meeting. '-' .-../ REGUL-\R AGENDA FEBRU.-\RY J, 2002 PAGE T\W 2. PROCLi\l\1ATIONS / PRESENTATIONS / ANNOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED) F. Announcement / The DEP Advisory Group meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 21, 2002 at 9:00 am at the St. Lucie County Civic Center, Meeting Room B, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida to present the proposed land management plans for Avalon State Park and Fort Pierce Inlet State Park with the Park Advisory Group. G. Announcement / The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Public Workshop to discuss the Community Parks System Master Plan/Bond Referendum on February 12, 2002 from 1:30 pm to 3:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. H. Announcement / There will be a Public Hearing on the Manatee Protection Plan on February 26, 2002 at 4:00 pm in the Commission Chambers I. Presentation / The St. Lucie River Initiative "ill provide a short presentation on the "Adopt a Drop" program/DThtr.... D(lØ;e.¡îf7;.1u;ý) g10ef> 3. GHŒRAL PUBLIC corvnvIENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA MPro'/ekt 4'-0 (~(l .Awfl; j I;~~flf¡ ~l)n~ 1111. If ALL~ (fhJ-cnc.r60n ~ )PUBUC HEARINGS PUBLIC \WRKS SA. . Engineering / Smallwood Avenue M.S.B.U. / Potable Water Improvements (FPUA) / Resolution No. 02-061 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution creating the Smallwood Avenue M.S.B.U., approve the preparation of an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, authorize the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the project, and approve funding the project using the :MSBU In-house Revolving Loan Program. /tpPrtJVleI:t é 1-/--0) COM!\IUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5B. Ordinance 02-009 - Consider the ordinance amending Section 8.00.03, Particular Permitted Accessory Structures and uses in Residential, Agricultural and Planned Unit Development Districts, to permit the storage of one recreational piece of equipment in a front yard otl,a paved surface for properties located in the unincorporated areas of the County. The second public hearing will be on Tuesday, February 19,2002 at 7:00 pm, or as soon thereafter as possible. ¡~ - no M/¡tJ'rt f!Q~ '-' "-' REGUU\R AGENDA FEBRUARY 5, 2002 P AGE THREE PUBUC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) 5C. 5D. 5E. 5F. Ordinance No. 02-004/ Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 3.01.03 (Q) (7), Commercial Neighborhood, Conditional Uses, to add new Paragraph F that would provide for the Establishment and Operation of Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages as a Accessory Use to a Restaurant and/or Civic, Social and Fraternal Organization) as a CO~itiOnal Use - Staff recommend';¡A"" that the Board not approve the draft ordinance0-0) ApPf'Ðùed. fDr.~Hf Ordinance 02-001 - Consider the ordinance amenöing the St. Lucie County LanW~T Development Code by amending Section 7.09.03(e)(2)(f) Landscaping an~ Screening, to add Cattley Guava, Common Guava, Loquat, Surinam Cherry an~" Rose Apple to the list of trees and plants that shall not be planted in St. Lucie " County. The se. cond public hearing will by-on Tuesday, February 19, 2002 at 7~~ C1 pm, or as soon thereafter as possible. / ~_ ý)O Aéh.0Yl rmtJjJt¡¿(}X· Resolution No. 02-031 / CPV CANA Ltd./ Quasi- Tudicial - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in Zoning from the IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning District to the U (Utilities) Zoning District. Location: west side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. Resolution No. 02-032 / CPV CANA Ltd./ Ouasi- Tudicial - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 250-megawatt electric generation plant. Location: west side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. End of Public Hearings 11r,èiH!Ii.·~!l· fl.! 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY Resolution No. 02-60 / Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution endorsing the replacement of the Bascule Bridge (North S.R. A-I-A) over the Intracoastal Waterway with a Fixed Bridge; and Urging the St. Lucie Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization direct its staff to coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation District IV Office to prepare an amendment to the Long Range Transportation Plan and place this project on the MPO's 2025 Long Range Transportation (Needs) Plan and Cost Feasible Plan. '-' ....,¡ CONSENT AGENDA February 5. 2002 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 17 and No. 18 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Engineering / Indian Lagoon Trace Phase lA and IB - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $132,558.48 for the project, and approve the transfer of $81,394 from the Juanita Ave. Sidewalk Improvement project and $39,221 from the Oleander Bike Path project which will be replaced in the 2002-03 CIP budget. B. Engineering / South County Regional Sports Stadium Project - Consider staff recommendation to accept the project, release retainage in the amount of $15,114.30 and make final payment to Gerelco Electrical Contractors in the amount of $15,114.30. C. Engineering / Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging and Shoreline Stabilization and Improvements Reach 2 Projects - Consider staff recommendation to approve Work Authorization No.2 with BCI Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $33,050, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. D. Engineering / South 25th Street Roadway Widening Project (Midway Road to Edwards Road) - Consider staff recommendation to approve the First Amendment to the Consultant Agreement with Inwood Consulting Engineers in the amount of $39,245.23 for a Bridge Hydraulics Report and Analysis for 10 Mile Creek. E. West First Street MSBU / Potable Water Improvements / Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise for the Second Public Hearing on March 5, 2002 at 7:00 pm, or as soon thereafter as possible. F. Road and Bridge / Annual Resurfacing Contract - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order r-;o. 3 with Dickerson Florida, Inc. which will decrease the contract by $711,062.73 to a final contract amount of $1,860,847.02, authorize the Chairman to sign the change order, release the retainage and make final payment of 5185,543.65. G. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise the Manatee Protection Plan Public Hearing on February 26, 2002 at 4:00 pm. 3. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-026 / Purchase of One (1) 15,000# GVWR F-450 SD Cab & Chassis - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Don Reid Ford in the amount of $31,830. '-' CO:\SENT AGENDA FEBRUARY 5, 2002 PAGE nvo .."j 3. PURCHASING (CONTINUED) B. Permission to Advertise a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Not-For-Profit Entity to Develop and Operate a Wildlife Rehabilitation/Hospital/Sanctuary at lndrio Savannahs Natural Area - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise an RFP. C. Permission to Advertise a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to Pre-Qualify Contractors for Additions and Modifications to the St. Lucie County Correctional Facility Security Systems - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise an RFQ. D. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise a bid for the purchase of Herbicides, Pesticides and Fertilizer for St. Lucie County and the Treasure Coast Purchasing Co- Operative. E. Bid No. 02-028 / Purchase of Baling Wire - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to Cavert Wire Company, Inc., Apex Pinnacle, L&P Wire-Tie Systems and pango Sales, Inc. 4. ADMINISTRATION A. Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc. Consumer Representative - Consider the recommendation of Barbara Jacobowitz, Executive Director of the Treasure Coast Health Council to appoint !\Jr. Lawrence Brooks to the Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc. as the Consumer Representative. B. Budget Amendment No. 02-119 / Equipment Request No. 02-192 / Media Equipment - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request for the purchase of a non-linear editing workstation (CPU) for the purpose of editing video/audiO footage from the Computer Station in the amount of $3,990 to be used by the Media Specialist for producing video productions. 5. CENTRAL SERVICES Roof Replacement for Data Treatment Center and Sloan Property - Consider staff recommendation to approve the reallocation of funds budgeted for the Sheriff's Gate to be used for Roof Replacement and Stucco Work for the Data Treatment Center and the Sloan Property in the amount of $35,000. 6. PARKS .AND RECREATION Budget Amendment No. 02-120/ Amphitheater Electrical Upgrade - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment to use $6,000 out of Contingency and authorize staff to proceed vvith the upgrade. \w CONSENT AGENDA FEBRUARY 5,2002 PAGE THREE ..¡ 7. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Resolution No. 02-030 / Florida Tire Recycling - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution approving the request of Florida Tire Recycling, Inc. for a Major Site Plan Adjustment approval to allow the construction of 43,000 square feet of industrial space. B. Request of David N. Sowerby for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02 .09(A)(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Muller Road SID - Minor Site Plan/Preliminary Plat - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request. C. Tourism Advertising Grant Agreement I Treasure Coast Manatee Foundation Sea Cows on Parade - Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. D. Tourism Special Event Grant Agreement / The Saints of Port St. Lucie Golf Course - Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. 8. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE Engineering / Harmony Heights Stormwater Master Plan / Work Authorization No. 3 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract amount of $67,099.84 for the contract with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., for the Stormwater Master Plan. \w -...I "' FEBRUARY 5, 2002 7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY C01\1MISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission "ill discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.11., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments \\ill be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman \vill ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE CŒßlISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.!\!. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Commllllity Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' '-' www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA February 5, 2002 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ,1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held January 22, 2002. 2. PRESENT A TIONS ANNOUNCE~IEtrrS Resolution No. 02-63 Proclaiming the Month of February, 2002 as "Children's Dental Health Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida. B. Announcement / There will be a Joint Meeting 'with the City of Port St. Lucie on March 14, 2002 at 3:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. C. Announcement / The Fort Pierce City Commission and Board of County Commissioners will hold a joint workshop to review the status of the Port Master Plan on February 19, 2002 at 1:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. D. Announcement / The Florida Department of Environmental Protection will hold a public workshop for Avalon State Park and Ft. Pierce Inlet State Park on Wednesday, February 20,2002 at 7:00 pm at the St. Lucie County Civic Center, Room 101,2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida to present the proposed land management plans for these parks to the public. E. Announcement / The Florida Department of Environmental Protection will hold a public workshop for Savannas Preserve State Park on Wednesday, February 21, 2002 at 7:00 pm at the Port St. Lucie Parks and Recreation Community Center, 2195 Southeast Airoso Blvd., Port St. Lucie, Florida to receive comments from the public regarding management and land uses for the Savannas Preserve State Park before the development of a new management plan for the park. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boarll at these meetings will need a record of the proceedmgs and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedìngs will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any indivldual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1418 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior fo the meeting. '- ., REGULAR AGENDA FEBRUARY 5, 2002 PAGE THREE Ordinance No. 02-004/ Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 3.01.03 (0) (ï), Commercial Neighborhood, Conditional Uses, to add new Paragraph F that '\"QuId provide for the Establishment and Operation of Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages as a Accessory Use to a Restaurant and/or Civic, Social and Fraternal Organization) as a Conditional Use - Staff recommends tiD that the Board not approve the draft ordinance. r &In..fs.D. Ordinance 02-001 - Consider the ordinance amending the St. Lucie County Land lll" \. Development Code by amending Section 7.09.03(e)(2)(f) Landscaping and N Screening, to add Cattley Guava, Common Guava, Loquat, Surinam Cherry and Rose Apple to the list of trees and plants that shall not be planted in St. Lucie County. The second public hearing will be on Tuesday, February 19,2002 at ï:OO pm, or as soon thereafter as possible. ~~ ~ r ~ {,,J" j)... SE. L blJ /1' \/ ~,~~:; flV SF. V~ J. J I qAl1 ~øY PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) MUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONTINUED Resolution No. 02 -031 / CPV CANA Ltd.j Ouasi- Tudicial - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in Zoning from the IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning District to the U (Utilities) Zoning District. Location: west side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. Resolution No. 02-032 / CPV CANA Ltd.j Ouasi- Tudicial - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 2S0-megawatt electric generation plant. Location: west side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut -Off Road. End of Public Hearings AÞ~-- ~:::~ ATfORNEY Resolution No. 02-60 / Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution endorsing the replacement of the Bascule Bridge (North S.R. A-I-A) over the Intracoastal Waterway with a Fixed Bridge; and Urging the St. Lucie Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization direct its staff to coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation District IV Office to prepare an amendment to the Long Range Transportation Plan and place this project on the MPO's 2025 Long Range Transportation (Needs) Plan ~-d (sot r ~.Jl~l'ii Ifll~ . '-~ , J ... CONSENT AGENDA FEBRUARY 5,2002 PAGE TWO 3. PURCHASING (CONTINUED) B. Permission to Advertise a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Not-for-Profit Entity to Develop and Operate a Wildlife Rehabilitation/Hospital/Sanctuary at Indrio Savannahs Natural Area - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise an RFP. C. Permission to Advertise a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to Pre-Qualify Contractors for Additions and Modifications to the St. Lucie County Correctional FacilitySecurity Systems - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise an RFQ. D. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise a bid for the purchase of Herbicides, Pesticides and Fertilizer for St. Lucie County and the Treasure Coast Purchasing Co- Operative. E. Bid No. 02-028 / Purchase of Baling Wire - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to Cavert Wire Company, Inc., Apex Pinnacle, L&P Wire-Tie Systems and Pango Sales, Inc. 4. ADMIT'\ISTRATION A. Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc. Consumer Representative - Consider the recommendation of Barbara Jacobowitz, Executive Director of the Treasure Coast Health Council to appoint Mr. Lawrence Brooks to the Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc. as the Consumer Representative. B. Budget Amendment No. 02-119 / Equipment Request No. 02-192 / Media Equipment _ Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request for the purchase of a non-linear editing workstation (CPU) for the purpose of editing video/audio footage from the Computer Station in the amount of $3,990 to be used by the Media Specialist for producing video productions. 5. CENTRAL SERVICES Roof Replacement for Data Treatment Center and Sloan Property - Consider staff recommendation to approve the reallocation of funds budgeted for the Sheriff's Gate to be used for Roof Replacement and Stucco Work for the Data Treatment Center and the Sloan Property in the amount of $35,000. 6. PARKS AND RECREATION Budget Amendment No. 02-120/ Amphitheater Electrical Upgrade - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment to use $6,000 out of Contingency and authorize staff to proceed with the upgrade. '-' ...., CONSENT AGENDA February 5. 2002 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 17 and No. 18 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Engineering / Indian Lagoon Trace Phase lA and IB - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $132,558.48 for the project, and approve the transfer of $81,394 from the Juanita Ave. Sidewalk Improvement project and 539,221 from the Oleander Bike Path project which will be replaced in the 2002-03 ClP budget. B. Engineering / South County Regional Sports Stadium Project - Consider staff recommendation to accept the project, release retainage in the amount of $15,114.30 and make final payment to Gerelco Electrical Contractors in the amount of $15,114.30. C. Engineering / Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging and Shoreline Stabilization and Improvements Reach 2 Projects - Consider staff recommendation to approve Work Authorization NO.2 with BCl Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $33,050, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. D. Engineering / South 25th Street Roadway Widening Project (Midway Road to Edwards Road) - Consider staff recommendation to approve the First Amendment to the Consultant Agreement ,vith Inwood Consulting Engineers in the amount of $39,245.23 for a Bridge Hydraulics Report and Analysis for 10 Mile Creek. E. West First Street MSBU / Potable Water Improvements / Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise for the Second Public Hearing on March 5, 2002 at 7:00 pm, or as soon thereafter as possible. F. Road and Bridge / Annual Resurfacing Contract - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order NO.3 with Dickerson Florida, Inc. which will decrease the contract by 5711,062.73 to a final contract amount of $1,860,847.02, authorize the Chairman to sign the change order, release the retainage and make final payment of 5185,543.65. G. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise the Manatee Protection Plan Public Hearing on February 26, 2002 at 4:00 pm. 3. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-026 I Purchase of One (1) 15,000# GVWR F-450 SD Cab & Chassis - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Don Reid Ford in the amount of $31,830. '--' CONSENT AGENDA FEBRUARY 5, 2002 PAGE THREE ...,." 7. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Resolution No. 02-030 / Florida Tire Recycling - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution approving the request of Florida Tife Recycling, Inc. for a Major Site Plan Adjustment approval to allow the construction of 43,000 square feet of industrial space. B. Request of David N. Sowerby for an exemption from the fequirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(S), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to pfepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Mullef Road SID - Minor Site Plan/Preliminary Plat - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request. C. Tourism Advertising Grant Agreement / Treasure Coast Manatee Foundation Sea Cows on Parade - Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed agreement and authorize the Chaifman to sign the agreement. D. Tourism Special Event Grant Agreement I The Saints of Port St. Lucie Golf Course - Consider staff fecommendation to approve the proposed agfeement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. 8. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE Engineering / Harmony Heights Stormwater Mastef Plan I Work Authorization No. 3 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the contfact amount of $67,099.84 for the contfact with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., fOf the Stormwater Mastef Plan. ...... ...., .f BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: January 22, 2002 Tape: 1-3 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjourned: 12:30 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes, Frannie Hutchinson, John D. Bruhn, Paula A. Lcwis Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County AdministJ:ator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Dennis Murphy, Interim Community Development Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Pete Keogh, Parks and Recreation Director, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, David Rodriguez, Human Resources Director, Susan Kilmer, Library Director, Marie Gouin, M & B Director, Don West, County Engineer, Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager, Pat Tobin, Economic Development Manager; A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk l. MINUTES (1-038) It was"moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the minutes of the meeting held January 15, 2002; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENT A TIONS/ ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Employee of the Quarter- The County Administrator announced the "Employee of the Quarter" . Mrs. Doreen Pike. B. Announcement- There will be a Joint Meeting with the City of Port St. Lucie on March 14, 2002 at 3:30 p.m. in the Commission Chambers. C. Announcement/ The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Strategic Planning Session at 8:00 a.m. on February 1, 2002 at St. Lucie West Country Club. D. Announcement- The Fort Pierce City Commission and the Board of County Commissioll will hold a Joint Workshop to review the status of the 1'01'( Master Plan 011 February 1 (), 2()02 at 1:]0 1'.111. in the Commission Chambers. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS(I-039) Ms. Pat Ferrick, representing the North Fork Property Owners Association, addressed the Board ami introduccd a Burn Ball Ordinance draf1ed by the Association for the Board's cOl1sideration( as attached). Ms. Arlene Goodman, White City resident, addressed the Board in favor of the proposed Ordinance and stated due to the burning of vegetation, she had developed a health problem. Mr. Herbert Beach, White City resident, addressed the Board in favor of the proposed Ordinance. Ms. Pat Ferrick, addressed the Board regarding the change to LOR's and presented the changes as proposed. (as attached). Ms. Ferrick also read comments from the Conservation Alliance regarding the tree protection ordinance (attached). I '-' ..." , .,. ... 4. CONSENT AGENDA (1-140) It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the Consent Agenda with item C-4A pulled for a separate vote; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Com. Bruhn advised the Board that he would be abstaining from voting on item C-4A due to a joint business venture with the firm. C-4A- COUNTY ATTORNEY Kirschner & Garland P .A. Amendment to Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed amendment for' legal representation of indigents for non-capital felonies and misdemeanors and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously, with Com. Bruhn abstaining. 1.' WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 16. 2. PARKS AND RECRATION A. Community Parks System Master Plan!Lawnwood Recreation Complex Master Plan Update (Parks Referendum)- A written update has been forwarded to the Board. B. Fairwinds Golf Course Pavilion- The Board approved the contract and Scope of Work with Thomas Lucido & Associates in the amount of $9,000. C. Budget Amendment No. 02-118- The Board approved the budget amendment to reimburse the Parks and Recreation budge4t in the amount of $9,554 for dollars expended to accommodate the AMISTAD Sailing Ship's visit. 3. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-219/ Cortez Blvd., at 29th St. Culvert Replacement- The Board approved awarding the bid to the low bidder, Lucas Marine Construction, Inc., in the amount of $ I 26.650 for a total project budget of $144,315 and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. Staff also recommended reallocating funds in the amount of $39,915 from the NSLRWCD Canal 102 & Selvitz Culvert Project to be funded in FY 2002-03. B. Permission to Advertise- The Board approved advertising an Invitation to Bid for Library Book Rental Plan Services. C. Budget Amendment No. 02-114/Equipment Request No. 02-177- The Board approved the bid waiver, budget amendment and equipment request l'or the pl1l'chase or twelve automalic external defibrillators rrom Salèty Products, Inc., in the amount 01'$22,680. D. Permission to Advertise/Equipment Request Nos. 02-187,02-188,02- 189,02-190- The Board approved advertising an Invitation to Bid for 2 01/18/0~ FZABWARR FUND 001 001106 001111 001139" 001140 001143 001265 001269 001271 001809 101 101003 101006 101104 102 102001 102104 105 107 107001 107002 , ~7003 122 113 115 116 117 118 119 123 136 140 140121 140309 140310 140319 145201 160 183 183001 183002 183004 184203 185002 310002 315 316 ) 401 418 421 441 448 451 461 471 491 505 505001 611 625 ~ ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD J ..., PAGE 1 WARRANT LIST #16- 12-JAN-2002 TO 18-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 (95/96) FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 96/97 FHA Transportation for 21st Century Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 TDC Planning Grant FY01/02 FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 DHR-Historical Museum Grant-In-Aid SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees FHWA/FDOT Hurricane Floyd reimburse Unincårporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Library Special Grants Fund ' Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper USDO~Ed Byrne Drug FY01/02 Harmony Heights 3 Fund Sheraton Plaza Fund Sunland Gardens Fund Sunrise Park Fund Paradise Park Fund Holiday Pines Fund Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund Port & Airport Fund FAA Taxiway A-3, Airfield Signage Installation #236741-1-94-01 Airfield Signage #408784-1-94-01 FDEP-Airport Park Wastewater 01/02 FCT- Pepper Park Addition Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 Impact Fees-Parks County Building Fund County Capital Rouse Road MSBU Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities Renewal & Replacement Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 376,604.11 24,379.00 50,075.00 30.67 626.78 5,913.74 219.62 262.11 143.01 265.92 44,898.01 10,536.88 31,636.97 10,855.28 29,163.01 1,332.80 265.34 1,115.72 74,342.68 4,141.10 5,477.05 9,852.55 72,363.00 203.45 450.06 496.68 123.93 723.87 726.67 253.66 1,753.25 20,445.72 182,530.32 7,098.40 13,182.75 300.00 6,408.86 2,495.68 3,378.26 650.08 200.00 677.32 457.56 552.25 16,170.00 913.16 17,247.19 77.20 88,343.96 24,706.21 41.66 57,149.94 8,751.50 22,707.10 27,015.22 3,301.44 9,078.25 192,354.04 1,141.44 1,985.60 /.6,033.62 1,494,626.65 PAYROLL 442,672.58 0.00 0.00 400.95 3,479.21 1,204.52 388.26 1,188.80 1,903.63 1,188.80 103,928.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,318.02 4,470.31 1,226.40 2,110.86 89,150.05 829.15 829.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,972.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,364.00 3,666.71 " 2,099.99 0.00 2,874.61 0.00 2,519.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - .-_n_9..:..22 34,984.83 20,753.28 196 . 52 4,127.08 0.00 772.53 7,083.90 5,207.98 21,16~.62 842.40 1,848.02 3,273.88 0.00 835,042.67 ~ -..J .. 'r BURN BAN ORDINANCE: Exotic plants, trees, vegetation or toxic materials Ordinance No. 0 -02 restricts burning of any exotic plants, trees, or vegetation, or toxic material in St. Lucie County. Pursuant to 163.3201, Florida Statutes in order to preserve, protect, and improve the public health, safety, comfort, good order, appearance, convenience, and general welfare of residents in St. Lucie County. We here-by estabnsh a Burn Ban of all-exotic plants, trees, or vegetation, including toxic material East of I-95 in St. Lucie Cou~ty. Exception if all property owners that reside within 5000 feet sign a release stating no health issues exist. We further note that the Bratilian Pepper [Scinos terebinthis folios] is a member of the poison ivy family, and that the smoke is a carcinogen and can cause sever allergic reactions to sensitive individuals. The smoke can affect people with astñma, and other breathing disorders. We further order that all burning of exotic vegetation West of 1-95 require a burn curtain if within 1000 feet of a property line with an occupied dwelling as prescribed by the forestry service. We the undersigned request that you institute the above type ordinance to protect the health, and safety of all residents of St. Lucie County. Name: Address City Zip ------------------- -------------------------- --------- ----"\-_- , ------------------- -------------------------- --------- -------- , ------------------- --------------------------, --------- ------- ------------------- -------------------------- , --------- ------- 10 .," \w ..." '" ,; . North Fork Property Owners 2630 Rainbow Drive Fort Pierce, Fla. 34981 Dear Chairman Coward, and Board Members. (amended) 1/17/02 St Lucie County Local Planning Agency: Change to LOR's Our association has recently become aware that our tree protection ordinance and vegetation removal ordinance can be and is being circumvented with the issuance of an exemption permit to remove exotics. This is otcurring because currently we do not require site inventory and the location of non-exotics that may be located on the property. A site inventory and inspection is needed prior to the issuance of this type of permit. What we now su.f!J!est is the following: You amend the existing exemotion permit' to require the following a statement by the properlY owner or contractor as to: 1. What IYpes of vegetation are on the orooerlY oak trees. cabbage trees. palm trees etc as defined by ordinance. 2. A statement by the oroperty O'W11er. or contractor stating if the site onlv contains exotics. 3. A site insoection. if oossible or an aerial map for that area from the oroperty aooraisers office to identify what vegetation is on site. If the aerial is inconclusive as to identification of vegetation then an on sile ins/Jeclion. 4. This orovision shall not affect residential oroperlY 1 acre or less as currentlv exists. Exotics are defined as : Non-native vegetation that is considered a nuisance, invasive, or a pest. Exotic vegetation includes, but is not limited to, Brazilian ... pepper (Schinos terebinthis folios). Australian Pine (Casuarinaa equisetifolia), and Melaleuca (Malealeuca quinquenervia). We feel that requirements should be instituted prior to the issuance of a permit for the removal of exotics. Those requirements should include a vegetation inventory, which shows: '-' ....,¡ . ~ 8. Location of all types of vøgøtation in the area of exotic removal. b. Vegetation defined as: Any living plant tissue Including bees. shrubs, herbs, hedges. grasses, fungi, and algae. c. Protection for all non-exotic yegetation In area as specified in section 6.00.03 (1] in the Land Development Regulations. d. Inventory of site and the: Loeation of Habitat of Endangered or Thrutened Species. e. Protection for the habitat of Endangered or Threatened Species as specified in 6.04.00 (0] {a.} of the LOR's.. We have \earned recently that we have been living in 8 fool's paradise in our assumption that we had a vegetation protection ordinance that did just that, protect. We have an ordinance. but there is a way to by-pass it. We recently leamed that by getting a permit to remove exotics, no inventory lists were mquired. that showed the location of vegetation existing on the site, or the endangered or thruatøned species as defined in the LOR's.. Just getting a pennit to remove exotics that exlst circumvents the ordinances that were designed to protect thÐ Habitat of Endangered or Threatened Species and to protect the Vegetation on site as defined in the land Development Regulations. We respectfully request you research the situation and ntCtify the loophole that exists. By requiring that a site location map which indicates the type of vegetation on the premises be presented !!!!.It! the application for the removal of exoUcs. And if nos..<;iblc require a site Úl."i/JCctjOT1 for veget"dtion. and Hélbitat for EndarlUert...-"d or 'l1lreéltened Species by the office ÎSsuinil the permit. Or at the very I('"ast identify the vC1!etdnon from aerial maDS. In addition we also request that you keep an updated list of newly identified exotic species and add to that list of exotics, for example, the exotic Asian Climbing Fern, as identified. Respectfully, ... 01/08J02:FiIeNFORD11 Changes are underlined: 1117102 '-l"r(hl;0rk~~ ¿~ '- ~. n. ~ - - ., , . I ~ . '. :,&r.. L,.( e /-:- _" r,Fcrrkk {~lWl.:"rnll1l..'nr.J ru:r. ".. '_'~. -f_" I '-l~ . -::I--. CONSERVA1'ibft AW.Vfœ of St. LIIqe County. ~ P.. ò. ... 12515 . P'w( PIen:e. ,...... 3oft"l"251lt -..If' t. ~ ....¡.,..; .. ~ ............ .... .. ...-.- ... - ...... .... ..........,... eMIt·. ~ 1 .......... ..........,.- --- ----- -.- .,... "-," .. -----. - _. January 18. 2002 To Chainnan Doug Coiwrd and the Stlocie Co. Commis.sion: As one of tho three persons who WOl1ced On the first proposed Tree Protection Ordinance {that was in 1973) I fee/I should speak up and ask thiltthe Tree Protection Ordinanœ we have today be amended to do what we had hClpfld to do 29 years .ago : create 9 plan to eave our old oak ~ and other valuable native trees. I have recently seen several large tracts in the White City area that have been stripped of almost all veg8tatlon, oak trees Included. We have alWay& urged the removal of exotic trees ( pest trees such a8 Brazilian Pepper. Melaleuca and Australian Pines.) We did not, hOWever. forsee that allowing people to r8O\0IIe eÄotlc trees WIthout ffrst specifically identifying the trees to be protected and saved. would aI/ow people to go ahead and clear out all vegeœtlon. the good with the bad. Once the old oak trees are destroyed it Is too late. A fine does not bring them' back to life. .. Please re-do the Tree Ordinance to cootdinate destruction of exotics wittl protection of the native trees. Sincerely yours, _ òfo l"~ ;<. v'~c:. aLace K. Vltunac. (White City) 810 Kitterman Road Port St. Lucie FL 34952-9017 ( Member Board of Directors. Conservation Aftianee) ... TCTAl P_Cl \w ...., . :. the purchase and installation of Media Presentation Equipment for the Commission Chambers and granted approval of the equipment requests to purchase the equipment. 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY B. George D. Dugan, III Esq. Amendment to Agreement- The Board approved the proposed amendment for legal representation of indigent persons in cases falling within the category of Juvenile Delinquency when the Public Defender is precluded from representation. C. Cultural Affairs Council Member Reappointments- The Board approved reappointing Marti Reno Curtis, Margaret Ash and G. Edgar Straeffer for . second terms on the Council. 5. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Petty Cash Account for the Court Administrator- The Board approved establishing an account in the amount of $100.00. G. UTILITIES Treasure Coast Regional Utilities Organization Feasibility Study for a Bio-Solids Treatment Facility- The Board approved payment in the amount of $12,500 for St. Lucie County's share in cost for the study. 7. PUBLIC WORKS A. Solid Waste Baling & Recycling Facility Project- The Board approved final payment to Adams in the amount of$50,000. B. Solid Waste/Equipment Request No. 02-183- The Board approved the equipment request for the sole source purchase of two Safetech Conveyor Safety Systems from Sierra International in the amount of $45,700. C. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Recreational Trails Program- The Board approved the County Administrator signing and submitting the grant application to assist with the construction of the Lakewood Park Recreational Path. 8. ADMINISTRATION District 19 Medical Examiner Reappointment- The Board concurred with the Medial Examiners Commission to recommend reappointment of Dr. Roger E. Mittleman and authorized the County Administrator to complete and return the reappointment- form to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. 9. MOSQUITO CONTROL Coastal Impact Assistance Program Grant for the Reintegration of Bear Point Mosquito Impoundment to the Indian River Lagoon- the Board approved the Chairman signing the Commerce national Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration grant award documents and the Interlocal Agreement with the St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District to administer the project. 10. SHERIFF'S OFFCIE 2002 State Criminal Alien Assistance Program Grant- The Board approved the electronic submission of the grant application and authorized the County Administrator to sign the application. 3 ..... -' . i' REGULAR AGENDA(l-595) 5.A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 02-029/Duke Energy- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a 12 month extension to Resolution No. 01-007 which granted a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction of a 540 megawatt, electric generation plant. Ms. Maureen Dwyer, attorney for the petitioner, addressed the Board's questions. Ms. Dwyer advised the Board that they are moving forward diligently and would request approval of the modified draft resolution as presented by the Interim Community Development Director. No Public Comments. The County Attorney stated he was comfortable with the Interim Community Development Directors explanation. .. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the Resolution as modified; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 5. AIRPORT (1-1000) A. Amendment to the Environmental Resource Permit Joint Participation Agreement with the FDOT for Airport Security- Consider staff recommendation to approve the amendment to allow reimbursement to the Sheriffs Department in the amount of $32,309.41 and the Airport in the amount of $12,470 for funds spent to date, and allow' for the balance to be used for part time security coverage until September 30, 2002. The Airport Director addressed the Board on this issue and the funding guidelines. Tt was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Radar Coverage at St. Lucie County International Airport- Consider staff recommendation to concur with the consultant's conclusion and provide for the installation of the Federal Aviation Administration certified Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System (STARS) Lite terminal display system as the most appropriate low level radar coverage. Mr. Nick Nesta, HNTB Consultant, addressed the Board on his findings. The Board expressed their concerns regarding the funding ofthis system. The Airport Director requested direction from the Board regarding their preference selection of the systems and then they would return with funding options for the Board's review. The Board directed staff to proceed and come back with funding options and a time frame. 6. ADMINISTRATION (1-1837) A. Duke Energy North America Tax Abatement Request- Staff requested direction on whether or not a letter of intent should be sent to Duke Energy offering the requested 3-year tax abatement program. Staff is 4 '-' ,.., . ." concerned that approval of this application may lead to additional applications by companies that are similarly situated. The County Administrator advised the Board of the Citizens Budget Committee's unanimous vote recommending denial of the requested abatement. Com. Bruhn commented in favor of the abatement and stated he did not have a problem with any company who requests a tax abatement and rightfully deserve it. Com. Lewis stated she felt the abatement was a good incentive and the county would not be losing any monies by giving the abatement, but would lose significant tax dollars if they decide not to build in St. Lucie County. Com. Coward stated his opposition to the abatement and stated this was the only company that he is aware of that has requested the tax abatement in order to proceed. The other companies who are considering St. Lucie County have not requested a tax abatement and if this is approved, they would be setting a precedent for other companies to request this tax break. He would like to see the plant built in St. Lucie County, but, he does not feel the tax abatement prognu,n is necessary for this to happen. Com. Barnes stated that while he would welcome the company and its investment he does not believe the tax abatement is necessary. Ms. Maureen Dwyer, representing the petitioner, addressed the Board regarding this request. Mr. Wall, Vice President of Duke Energy, addressed the Board and advised them of the decision he must make within the next few weeks. The company has only one set of equipment and 4 sites to consider, St. Lucie County being one of them. The other three sites already have an approved tax incentive program. This is important based on economic and business issues and most importantly it demonstrates community support. Mr. Wall made a short presentation and addressed the Board's concerns. Mr. Jeff Furst, Property Appraiser, St. Lucie County, addressed the Board on this issue. Mr. Furst stated that there is a legal issue by which he has determined that the criteria has not been met and this issue has not been resolved. There is a court case in another part of the state where a Circuit Court as well as the Appeals Court in that district has not ruled favorably toward the position he has taken. This issue is likely going to the State Supreme Court. His position is and will remain, that he is not going to grant the exemption as he interprets it for the power companies, unless he would see a situation where a major power company were building a plant with a lot of employment and other factors: The peeking plants as he is reviewing them, he will continue to say they do not meet the criteria as he sees it. This will undoubtedly go to the Supreme Court and we will have to wait for the outcome. Mr. Furst stated he would not over ride the Board's opinion on this matter however. Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island addressed the Board and stated concurred with the Property Appraiser's comments. Mr. Boudreaux, FPUA addressed the Board in support of the tax abatement request. He advised the Board that Duke Energy has an option to purchase reclaimed water from FPUA. Mr. Herbert Beach, White City resident, addressed the Board in opposition to the tax abatement for Duke Energy. 5 \w ...., . I Mr. Doug Davis, Richard K. Davis Construction Company, addressed the Board in favor of the abatement and the project due to the magnitude of jobs which will be provided during the construction period. Mr. Al Rivett, addressed the Board in favor of the tax abatement Com. Coward stated he did not believe there was a question as to whether or not they want the company in St. Lucie County, the Board is in favor of the company itself, the question is whether it is necessary to provide a tax abatement for this project to move forward. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to direct staff to write the letter of intent to consider the application for abatement provided all requirements are met; and upon rolr call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Barnes, Coward; Aye's: Hutchinson, Bruhn, Lewis; motion carried by a vote of 3 to 2. B. Bi-weekly Committee Reports- The Board gave updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on. 8. COUNTY ATTORNEY (2-2021) Resolution No. 02-59- Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution joining the Children's Services Council of St. Lucie County, St. Lucie County " School Board and other governmental agencies in supporting the reform of the current state and local tax system in St. Lucie County, Florida. Com. Coward stated he would be more in favor of writing a letter stating the Board is in favor of looking at the broader issue. The County Attorney suggested making the changes striking the word "will" and placing the word "should" and then in paragraph one, add the word "conceptually" after the word in, and delete all of paragraph two. This was his suggestion in order to gain Board consensus. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Hutchinson to approve the resolution as amended; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 9. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (2-2198) Port ofFt. Pierce Master Plan- Staff requested that the Board provide comments, concerns and areas for improvement with the draft goals, objectives and policies of the Port Master Plan. Mr. Jim Murley, Atlantic University, addressed the Board regarding the Master Plan and introduced Mr. .Jeff Blair, I'lorida Connict Resolution Consortiulll. Mr. Jeff Blair gave a presentation and requested the Board fill out the provided survey and return it to them by February . Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island resident, addressed the Board and stated that the 2nd draft does not include any of the improvements as requested by those who attended the Charrette. Com. Barnes commented on the suggestion given of releasing the authority of the Port from the elected officials, he stated his opposition to this suggestion and would prefer it stay at the County Commission level. Com. Coward commented on continuing to have a good working relationship with the City ofFt. Pierce on this project and stated his position was that he would like to keep the door open for consideration of a Port Authority after the vision has been implemented. 6 "- ..." ~ Mr. Murley advised the Board that in the various inputs they had, it was not clear who would be accountable for all the various activities that would be needed to execute and [und and various other things that they were hearing in the Charette and other input by the citizens. They are not recommending the management structure, they were trying to put their finger on who would be responsible for such things that could happen. Mr. Ramon Trias, City of Ft. Pierce Planning Director, advised the Board that there will be future discussions on the management ofthe Port and believes this is one of the topics which will be discussed at the workshop between the City and the County Commission. Mr. Blair advised the Board that should any questions arise, they can be communicated through staff. There beíng no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court .. 7 '- ..."" . l' { MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: January 22,2002 Tape: 3 Convened: 12:15 p.m. Adjourned: 12:16 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, John D. Bruhn, Paula A. Lewis, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes Others Pre~ent: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Ass1. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Don West, County Engineer, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Pete Keogh, Parks & Recreation Director, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINTUES It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the minutes of the meeting held December 18, 2001; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2... GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The District approved Warrant List No. 12 through 16. 2. MOSQUITO CONTROL Interlocal Agreement with 81. Lucie County to Administer the Coastal Impact Assistance Program Bear Point Restoration Project/Budget Resolution No. 02-01/ and Equipment Request No. 02-184, No. 02-185, and No.02-186- The District approved staff recommendation that the Chairman sign the agreement, and approve the budget amendment and equipment requests to purchase three pumps to restore the wetlands. There being no further business to be brought before the District, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court ~, , '-" ...., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. :< A DATE: February 5, 2002 REGULAR [XI PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-63 - Proclaiming the month of February, 2002, as "CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH MONTH" in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: Arlease Hall, Volunteer Services Coordinator for the St. Lucie County Health Department, has requested that this Board proclaim the month of February ,2002, as Children's Dental Health Month in St. Lucie County, Florida. The attached Resolution has been drafted for that purpose. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-63 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: {{] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (3-0) (HutChinson, Barnes Absent) Douglas Anderson County Administrator 9~~ Review and .Approvals County Attorney: ~ Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicablel___ Eff. 5/96 ~ ..., t RESOLUTION NO. 02-63 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2002, AS "CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH MONTH" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of8t. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. February is National Children's Dental Health Month, and many people are unaware of the important role early dental care plays in the overall health of children. 2. The American Dental Association (ADA) recommends that parents take action early to insure the health of their children's teeth, because attitudes and habits established at an early age are critical in maintaining good oral health throughout life. 3. During the month of February, 2002, the 81. Lucie County Health Department's Dental Clinic has planned activities to inform, educate, empower parents about health issues and mobilize community partnerships to continue to identify and solve dental health issues for the children in our community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED by the Board of County Commissioners ofS1. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby proclaim the month of February, 2002, as "CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH MONTH" in S1. Lucie County, Florida. 2. This Board urges the citizens of St. Lucie County to take part in the activities of the St. Lucie County Health Department Dental Clinic during Children's Dental Health Month; and to encourage our children to practice healthy dental care all year. \rr ..." PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 5th day ofFebruary, 2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ..... ?f< ~bA17 From: <Arlease_Hall@doh.state.f1.us> To: <TurnerD@co.st-lucieJl.us> Date: 1/22/024:02PM Subject: RE: Proclamation for: NATIONAL CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH MONTH (the month ~~ ~:l Feb. 5th is good, and John Mullins at 462-3809, Operations Manager will accept. Thoo~ ~ -m-Ori inal From: Diane Turner [mailto:TurnerD@co.st-lucie.f1.us~ o(.~ í() . Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1 :40 PM 1" rcA/ To: Arlease_Hall@doh.state.fl.us \ Subject: Re: Proclamation for: .l::/,/[TI ~ II "l. CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH MONTH (the month of February) ** Low Priority ** What meeting do you want it on, and who will accept it. I have Feb 5th at 7:00pm or Feb 12th at 9:00 am. >>> <Arlease_Hall@doh.stateJl.us> 01/18/02 01 :26PM >>> Diane, Can you please get us on the agenda for the proclamation. Again who do I give it to? Thanks so much! Arlease Hall Volunteer Services Coordinator St. Lucie County Health Deparlment 5150 NW Milner Drive Port St. Lucie, FL 34983 (561) 785-3755 pager 245-4889 suncom (561) 873-4889 SC 245-4889 FAX (561) 873-4940 SC 245-4940 Arlease _ Hall@doh.state.fl.us Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message, including any attachments, contains information that may be legally confidential and/or privileged. The information is for the sole use of the recipient(s) (individual or entity) named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any unauthorized disclosure, review, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please conlact the sender immediately by reply e-mail (and lor by telephone), that you have received the message in error, and proceed to delete it; destroy any and all copies of the original message. cc: <John_Mull ins@doh.state.fl.us> ~tK RESOLUTION :ïiI 01 Tð :01 fkJ E--rURN~R-- f?-'. ~a4lL ~ ~~~, 01/24;2002 1B:39 FAX ~~~J.l '? \ Qo,\me; 1;( (d:) S~ O~fu~ ~ ~ A RESOLUt'ION PROCLAIMING THE ENTIRE MONTH OF FEBRUARY AS "~ATlONAL Cffil,.DREN'S DENTALIŒALTH MONTH" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ., -= WHEREAS, the Board of CÚW1ty Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. February is National Childreo's Dental Health Month and many people are unaware of the important role early dental care plays in children overall health. 2. The American Dental Associiltion (ADA) reconunend that parents take action early to insure the health of their children's teeth because attitudes and habits established at an early age are critical in maitttaining good oral health throughout life. 3 During the month ofFebnwythe St. Lucie County Health Department's Dental Clinic has planned activities to inform, educate, empower parents about health issues and mobilize community p¡utnerships to continue to identify and solve dental health issues for the children in our community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of SL Lucie COLUlty, Florida: 1. 1lûs Board does hereby proclaim. the month of February, as "National Children's Dental H~.ltb" month in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. This Board w-ges the citizens ofSt. Lucie COWlL)' to take part in observance of healthy Dental habits for the childJen during" National Children's Dental Healtb" month- PASSED MTI DULY ADOPTED this 2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ~ / /4J MdI:+f Department of µ"",e /~ <,/",,,,,,,-- Environmental Protection ~c. A-(N"V";~ Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 -- Jeb Bush Governor January 23, 2002 David B. Struhs ;if ~ry Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator S1. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Dear Mr. Anderson: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks will conduct a public workshop for Avalon State Park and Ft. Pierce Inlet State Park on Wednesday, February 20,2002,7:00 PM (EST). The purpose ofthe meeting is to present the proposed land management plans for these parks to the public. The DEP Advisory Group meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 21,2002,9:00 AM (EST). The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the proposed land management plans for these parks with the DEP Advisory Group In compliance with subsection 259.032(10), Florida Statutes, the Division of Recreation and Parks is requesting that an announcement ofthe Division's public workshop and the DEP Advisory Group meeting be made at a meeting of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners prior to February 20, 2002. Enclosed are a copy of subsection 259.032(10), Florida Statutes, the public notice and an agenda for the workshop as well as the DEP Advisory Group meeting. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call me at (850) 488- 2200 or email me. My email addressisBrvAnne.White@.dep.stateJl.us. Your consideration and attention to this matter are greatly appreciated. Sincerely, t~v~ BryAnne White Government Operations Consultant II Office of Park Planning Division of Recreation and Parks BW/ r;::\D) . ~ ~ Œ U ~D. Œ:\n\.D¡ \\ Û \\I\'! \ " ~-,'1 ',: U 1 , ~ \. 'Jf\N 2 5!.-- \ W I..A.lL ¡ "Protect, ConselYe and Manage Florido's Environment and Natur Resour~" AG"·.N OfFiCE _.~ \ _I Enclosures Printed on recycled paper. ",. ~ PUBLIC NOTICE The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks announces a public workshop to which all persons are invited. DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 7:00 PM (EST) PLACE: S1. Lucie County Civic Center Room 10 I 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34950 PURPOSE: To present the proposed land management plans for Avalon State Park and Ft. Pierce Inlet State Park to the public. A copy of the agenda may be obtained by writing Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks, Office of Park Planning, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station #525, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000. Pursuant to the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting is asked to advise the agency at least 48 hours before the meeting by calling Perry Smith, Park Manager, F1. Pierce Inlet State Park, at (561) 468-4007. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency by calling 1-800-342-1335. ~ ...." Florida Department Of Environmental Protection Division Of Recreation And Parks (DRP) Public Workshop Avalon State Park And Ft. Pierce Inlet State Park Public Workshop This Meeting Is Open To The Public Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 Time: 7:00 PM (EST) Location: St. Lucie County Civic Center Room 10 I 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34950 AGENDA 1. Call To Order 2. Introduction Of Staff And Review Of Agenda 3. Presentation Of Proposed Land Management Plans: The DRP is required to submit updated land management plans for these parks at least every five years under Chapters 253 and 259, Florida Statutes. The DRP proposes to revise the current plans for these properties. 4. Public Comment On Proposed Land Management Plans 5. Adjournment "" ...., PUBLIC NOTICE The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks announces a DEP Advisory Group Meeting to which all persons are invited. DATE AND TIME: Thursday, February 21,2002,9:00 AM (EST) PLACE: St. Lucie County Civic Center Meeting Room B 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34950 PURPOSE: To present and review the proposed land management plans for Avalon State Park and Ft. Pierce Inlet State Park with the park Advisory Group. A copy of the agenda may be obtained by writing Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks, Office of Park Planning, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station #525, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000. Pursuant to the provisions of the Americaœ with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting is asked to advise the agency at least 48 hours before the meeting by calling Perry Smith, Park Manager, Ft. Pierce Inlet State Park, at (561) 468-4007. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency by calling 1-800-342-1335. · .. "" ..., Department of Environmental Protection 'J~ Jeb Bus h Governor Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee. Florida 32399-3000 David B. Struhs Secretary ¡h( .// ~ 'f v ¡Vl/J Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator # If /' S1. Lucie County ,r Á c ~ ;{(_ 2300 Virginia Avenue fr-' /¿J -z¿ Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 ¡),.J) vi"" Dear Mr. Anderson: ~~.."... j ~ The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks will conduct a public workshop for Savannas Preserve State Park on Thursday, February 21,20 , 7:00 PM (EST). The purpose of the meeting is to receive comments from the public regarding management and land uses for Savannas Preserve State Park before the development of a new management plan for the park. January 23,2002 In compliance with subsection 259.032(10), Florida Statutes, the Division of Recreation and Parks is requesting that an announcement of the Division's public workshop be made at a meeting ofthe St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners before February 21,2002. Enclosed are a GOpy of subsection 259.032(10), Florida Statutes, and the public notice and an agenda for the workshop. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call me at (850) 488-2200 or email me. My email address is BrvAnneWhitel1Vdeo.stateJl.us. Your consideration and attention to this matter are greatly àppreciated. Sincerely, 'tfw¡~~ BryAnne White Government Operations Consultant II Office of Park Planning Division of Recreation and Parks BW/ Enclosures "Protect, Conserve and Manage Florida's Environment and Natural Resources" Printtd on ro:ydtd þoþ". ~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ~ DATE: February 5, 2002 REGULAR [ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: St. Lucie River Initiative Presentation I "Adopt a Drop" Program BACKGROUND: See attachments FUNDS AVAILABLE: NjA PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Presentation by St. Lucie River Initiative on the "Adopt a Drop" Program and request for Board input, questions and support. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [x] OTHER: Reports given ~"- - Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County At.torney; Management & Budget Purchasing; Originating Dept Other; Other; Finance, (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 LVL'\.Ut\c:..c:..I'i c...1'iuJ..I...t:..t:..t(l ~ PAGI:. l'll '-" S"r. LUCfE~ RIVER. ~, llilJIÀ. IIVE ' ......1 PO. Bo" 2062 SI....,r', FL 34995 561/2B7-B156 'F.AX S61/286~71B8 Board or Directors FD .. Buo" Jord~n Lawrence Ë. Cr~ry. III Stell, Boland Michael J Brown, Jr Leslie CaMson MIKe (roo'. CPA Ma« Kelly Ti!110thy J. Klnarte Mol> OUèlCKeflOOS Edward R Weinberg January 24,2002 Mr. Raymond L. Wazny, P.E. Public Works Director St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Re: Adopt a Drop Program Dear Mr. Wazny: Thank you for your letter describing staff s support for the St. Lucie River Initiative Adopt a Drop Program. Enclosed please find a written summary of background and details of which may be helpful to your Board in evaluating the Program. We would be delighted to appear before the St. Lucie Board of County Commissioners to request their participation. We agree it should not become a burden on any ofthe local governments that elect to assist us with this, and will work with you to assure it meets St Lucie County's needs. Hazen and Sawyer Engineers have agreed to become the technical representatives for St. Lucie County, with direct costs paid by SLRl. should your Board agree to support the Program. Representatives of River Park and several other neighborhoods in the County have asked to be in the Program; we do not believe there will be a shortage of willing participants. At this time we hope to complete a pilot program of 5 neighborhoods in the County before July 31,2002. We see this as a learning experience for all of us, and will present a summary of lessons learned and probable costs (to SLRl and County) upon completion of the pilot period. Again, immediate expenses to the County should be limited to staff assistance with GIS mapping and database for the neighborhoods, and attending any meetings you wish to during the pilot period We look forward to appearing before the Board to ask their support and answer any questions. Sincerely, ~ r- : ... ~.' - [\1 FD Bud Jordan President Enclosure MISSION. To restore the St. LUCie River to health & prOductivIty through private & public action ~ """'" Adopt A Drop: A Program of the St. Lucie River Initiative The mission o.fthe Adopt A Drop program is to provide homeowners with the ways and the means to improve the quality of storm water and irrigation nmoff from their neighborhoods to the river. Research: Legal Mandates for St. Lucie River and Estuary Pollution Control Programs The goals, objectives, and activities of the Adopt a Drop program are consistent with established legislative directives. The program addresses the existing urban areas directly adjacent to the St. Lucie River and Estuary that other State and Federal agencies are not equipped to handle The St. Lucie River is tributary to the Indian River Lagoon. The Indian River Lagoon has been identified specifically by the Florida Legislature as a priority water body for preservation and restoration under the 1987 Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Act (Chapter 373453(1) (c) I F.S.). The Implementation strategy for achieving the intent of the legislation is described in the Indian River Lagoon SWIlVI Plan that is produced jointly by the St. John's River and the South Florida Water Management Districts. The most recent version of the Plan was produced in 1994. The portion of the Indian River Lagoon for which the South Florida Water Management District has primary responsibility begins at the geographical boundary between the SF\VMD and the SJR WMD just north of Ft. Pierce. The S1 Lucie Estuary and those canals and rivers that contribute to it, are where the important management opportunities for water quality protection and enhancement occur. The environmental goals for the estuary, which are Identified in the SWIM Plan, are to create and maintain conditions that are conducive for the establishment and maintenance of communities of oysters and submerged aquatic vegetation. The water quality objectives to help achieve thes~ goals are to control the delivery of fresh water, nutrients, and sediments being discharged from the watershed into the estuary. The freshwater problem is being addressed primarily through the ongoing Indian River Lagoon Restoration Feasibility Study being conducted by the US Army Corps of Engineers and the SFWMD. The results ofthat effort have resulted in the recommendaÜon to build multiple reservoirs in the basin that will catch and hold excess water that accumulates during periods of excess rainfalL This will provide more operational flexibility by which the SFw:MO can control freshwater releases in a manner that provides opportunity to maintain desirable salinity regimes in the estuary under a wider variety of climatic conditions This r~'.::II:.. (J.j "",. .'WI effort, which is part of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Project (CERP), is expected to provide some benefits for sediment and nulrient control also. The CERP project team and other scientific experts agree that CERP alone will not provide the degree of nutrient and sediment control necessary to reach the desired water quality objectives for the estuary. In fact 30 % of the total land area tributary to the estuary is downstream from the proposed CERP controlled system. The 1RL Restoration Plan estimates that 45% of freshwater going to the estuary will originate from this 30% of land, most of which is urban or suburban, in the basin. Meeting freshwater delivery and water quality objectives will require reliance on other types ofactivities in this downstream area and throughout the rest of the watershed. In 1999, the Florida Legislature again weighed in on this issue by passing the Watershed Restoration Act (Chapter 403.067 F.S.).This Act designates specific responsibilities to the State agencies (FDEP, FDACS, and WMDs) for various activities. The Act encourages, where possible, the use of VOLUNT AR Y efforts to address and alter practices that individuals use in their daily activities that contribute to the State's water quality problems. This reliance on voluntary efforts by industries and individuals is deemed- to be preferable to traditional command and control regulatory programs Action: . Explanation of Program and Logistics Adopt A Drop (AAD) is a program to educate homeowners about techniques they can implement to reduce the quantity of stormwater and non-point source pollution flowing into the estuary from their neighborhood; and to improve the quality offresh water before it reaches the estuary. "Strain it before you drain it" AAD creates a neighborhood action plan that citizens can use as a positive tool for action in their own yards and to request additional resources from local government for improvements within public lands. The plan includes the Florida Yards and Neighborhood Program to address individuals' yards, and recommendations for cost-effective neighborhood scale improvements such as baffle boxes, weirs in uncontrolled ditches, creation of retention areas, deferred maintenance, and other tools that will directly affect the quality of stormwater discharged from neighborhoods before it reaches the estuary. ... Overview of rronam ODeration 1) This program must have local government support to succeed. Local government support includes mapping, to illustrate existing storm water management facilities identified in specific neighborhoods; and installation of improvements over time as the most cost-effective retrofit tools are identified by ADD and agreed to by local government technical staff and policy makers. 2) ADD currently has a waiting list, including neighborhoods in Martin and St. Lucie counties and City of Stuart and Town of Sewalls Point. Initially, preference will be given to neighborhoods where local government has agreed to provide support. Secondary considerations will be neighborhood enthusiasm for the program; and 2 ....... ""'" neighborhoods without SFWMD permits because the.se represent the greatest OppOrtuIÙty for improvement. 3) When a neighborhood qualifies for the program, a walkabout date will be established. Walkabouts will include at least two residents, and a technical representative (TR) of AAD. FDEP and SFw:MD staff may attend. Local government may wish to send a representative as well, at their preference_ 4) Prior to the walk, the TR will obtain a map of the area and conduct a pre-walkabout survey ofthe neighborhood. This reconnaissance mission will familiarize the TR with the existing stormwater system and potential problems and opportuIÙties for improvements. . 5) A walkabout will be a maximum of two hours. Mornings are preferable, especially during the summer months. (Encourage walkers to bring water)". The neighborhood map will be marked up to show important drainage features and potential opponunities for improvements. A neighborhood data base including basic information about the neighborhood and its leaders will be filled out. SLRI will maintain the data base, a copy of which will provided the local government with jurisdiction. 6) The TR will draft a two page report on findings and recommendations, and provide the draft mapping to the local government for preparation ofthe neighborhood stormwater map and data table The draft maps and report will also be provided to neighborhood leaders for review and comment. Map symbols and report format will be standard across jurisdictions to facilitate communication between neighborhoods and local governments. 7) SLRI and neighborhood leaders will hold a meeting with the neighborhood residents to present the repòrt and discuss the findings and recommendations. This meeting will be open to as many residents as possible for maximum exposure. FYN has a great slide show on how yards can be managed, this will also be included. 8) Participating neighborhoods will be enrolled in the AAD Alliance of Neighborhoods, which will hold an annual meeting_ SLRI anticipates this Alliance eventually wìl1 become the most important grass roots organization supporting restoration of the St. Lucie Estuary. 9) A neighborhood will be considered "Adopt A Drop River Friendly Neighborhood" when . A walkabout has been completed · Post walkabout presentation has been made to neighborhood group · Endorsement of the AAD concepts has been accepted by the neighborhood representation. · If applicable, a request has been made in writing to the local government with jurisdiction for assistance · Stonnwater labels have been put on the drains (great family type project) · Florida Yards and Neighborhoods presentation has been made to neighborhood meeting. 3 "" .." . Neighborhood representative(s) has been designated for Alliance of Neighborhoods. SiRl Support: AAD will be communicated and supported through the following methods: · Articles in SLRl newsletter The Muckraker. · SLRl pays for Technical Representative for report writing, and presentation to neighborhoods. · SLRl manages program and coordinates with all parties. · Press releases sent out to media including environmental publications (NEP newsletter) · Presentation of AAD by staff and committee members at community meetings, environmental groups, etc. · Power Point/visual presentations to be used in group presentations. · Press releases including recognition of local government with jurisdiction distributed as neighborhoods are enrolled and success stories created. · Adopt A Drop Neighborhood signage will be created and posted in panicipating neighborhoods. 4 "\.... '-' AGENDA REQUEST ITE~O. 5A DATE: February 5,2002 SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DEPT REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [X] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: rtó~~~,1È~~ County Engineer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Smallwood Avenue M.S.B.U. - Potable Water Improvements - FPUA Initial Public Hearing BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: December 18, 2001 - Board accepted the petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 02-061 creating the Smallwood Avenue M.S.B.U.; approve the preparation of an interlocal agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority; authorize the County Engineer to procèed with the engineering and design of the Project; and approval to fund the project using the MSBU In-house Revolving Loan Program. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) 9-r L- Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator , Coordi nati on/S ianatu res ~, V~ ,"C,"",y ^,mm~ (¡; [x]Public Works Dir [x]Finance \ \7 [x]Mgt. & BUdget~ [x]Co. Eng~Ù. [ ¡Purchasing [x ]MSBU Coar W '-' ...." COMMISSION REVIEW: February 5, 2002 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 02-028 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Donald B. West, County Engineer?t~· January 23, 2002 Smallwood Avenue MSBU Initial Public Hearing BACKGROUND Property owners along a portion of Smallwood Avenue in the White City area have submitted a petition to St. Lucie County to establish a Municipal Service Benefit Unit (M.S.B.U.) to fund the costs necessary in bringing potable water and fire protection improvements in their area. Seven of the thirteen owners signed the petition, representing fifty-four (54%) in support of the Project. An informal meeting was held on November 29, 2001, with the residents to discuss Fort Pierce Utilities Authority as the utility service provider, the conceptual design, MSBU process, and to provide the residents with a rough estimate of the cost. Based upon the consensus of opinion of those present at the meeting, it was determined that the County should proceed with the MSBU project. In order to create the M.S.B.U. for potable water service provided by the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, the County must first enter into an interlocal agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. This agreement will establish FPUA and the County's responsibilities with respect to this specific project. Underthis agreement, the County agrees to assess the property owners for the municipal improvements provided by the FPUA. The FPUA will be responsible for the design, permitting, and construction of the potable water system, administration of the construction contract, inspection, and final acceptance of the system for maintenance. St. Lucie County will be responsible for the administration of the M.S.B.U.. The improvements will consist of an eight inch water main with fire hydrants to meet current fire protection requirements. After a monetary contribution by FPUA, the estimated project cost to the property owners, excluding tax collector fees is $65,000.00. The method of assessment for the potable water improvements shall be based upon the "Equivalent Residential Connection" (ERC) method, whereas each property owner is assessed equally for the improvements. This is a relatively small project and meets the criteria for in-house financing. Therefore, staff recommends that the Board approve funding the Smallwood MSBU through the MSBU In-house Revolving Loan Program. \r ,.., RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 02-061 creating the Smallwood Avenue M.S.B.U.; approve the preparation of an interlocal agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority; authorize the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the Project; and approval to fund the project using the MSBU In-house Revolving Loan Program. BP cc: Staff Concurring Tax Collector Property Appraiser '--' -..I RESOLUTION NO. 02-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DETERMINING THAT A PROJECT TO PROVIDE POTABLE WATER IMPROVEMENTS TO CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON SMALL WOOD A VENUE IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COUNTY AND WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROPERTIES WITHIN A PROPOSED SMALL WOOD AVENUE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; DETERMINING THAT 100% OF THE BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT WILL ACCRUE TO PROPERTIES WITHIN A PROPOSED SMALLWOOD AVENUE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; DETERMINING THAT THE METHOD OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE POTABLE WATER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE BASED UPON THE EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION METHOD; DETERMINING THA T THE COST OF THE PROJECT IS NOT IN EXCESS OF THE BENEFIT; CREATING THE SMALL WOOD AVENUE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; RESOLVING THAT 100% OF THE COST OF THE PROJECT SHOULD BE FUNDED BY NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SMALLWOOD AVENUE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT THROUGH AN ASSESSMENT BASED ON AN EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION METHOD OF ASSESSMENT; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 125, Florida Statutes and Chapter 1-13.5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances (the "Code), the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County, Florida (the "Board") has the authority to establish municipal services benefits units ("MSBU's") in unincorporated St. Lucie County to provide, among other things, drainage improvements and potable water service; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code, the Board has adopted procedures which govern the establishment and administration of such MSBU's; and -1- """ ...", WHEREAS, on December 18,2001 pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 1-13.5 of the Code, the Board accepted the petition of 54% of the land owners for potable water improvements within a proposed Smallwood Avenue Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "Smallwood Avenue MSBU") requesting that the Board create the Smallwood A venue MSBU to fund the cost of a project to provide potable water improvements to certain properties on Smallwood Avenue in unincorporated St. Lucie County (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, on February 5,2002 pursuant to the requirements of Section 1-13.5 of the Code, the Board held a duly advertised initial hearing to consider the creation of the Smallwood Avenue MSBU, proof of publication of this hearing is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the County Engineer has advised the Board that based on an analysis of the costs and benefits of the Project, the equivalent residential connection method of assessment is appropriate because this method of assessment fairly and reasonably apportions the cost of the project among the benefitted properties; and WHEREAS, after hearing the comments of the County staff as well as interested persons, the Board has made the following determinations: (1) the Project and the creation of the proposed Smallwood Avenue MSBU is in the best interest ofthe health, safety and welfare of the County and will be of benefit to the properties within the limits of the proposed Smallwood Avenue MSBU; (2) the percentage of the benefits of the Project which will accrue to properties within the limits of the proposed Smallwood Avenue MSBU as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is 100%; (3) the method of assessment to be used in assessing the benefitted properties shall be the equivalent residential connection method; and (4) the cost of the project is not in excess of the benefit gained by each of the properties which would be subject to the proposed assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: Section 1: A municipal services benefit unit to be known as the Smallwood Avenue Municipal Services Benefit Unit is hereby created as shown on the attached Exhibit "B". Section 2: The entire cost of the Project shall be funded through non-ad valorem special assessments levied against real property within the limits of the Smallwood Avenue MSBU. Section 3: The method of assessment shall be based on the equivalent residential connection method of assessment such that each lot owner within the Smallwood Avenue MSBU shall share proportionately in the cost of the Project in relationship to the benefit received. Section 4: The County Director of Engineering is hereby authorized to proceed with the Project pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code. -2 - '"" ...,¡ Section 5: In the event the Project is not ultimately approved and constructed, the cost of preparing the plans, specifications, and the cost estimates may be assessed against the real property within the Smallwood A venue MSBU. Section 6. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 2002 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney -3- '-'" ..",,¡ EXHIBIT A PROOF OF PUBLICA nON -4 - I I'#:; 9SC . - lfi02:()(JfZ:(Jf 1.50 k. ......" ~ù' (50~/9J 7.92 k \ \ , . \ ~ ~ ooz.JG (502:COl7-OOOflJ 2.92 Iv:; 5ft.~ QQ.<$ SiI 1502-<XJT8-{)()Q/1J 5.80 Ac -= W.M.D. CA~Pl.. NO. 19 aoo '-" ... I'r;- 1.0 I I I I 1 1)- - I~ ~ JS J!i! I. I~ I 1 '--- I I of Itf=- .: .205 I UU1 s> I .. f I . I 1 1 1 - J ~ I 1 ! I _ 421 80 .. ,n , - " ""'" EXHIBIT B MAP OF MSBU - -., flZ.£ (.433-<XXJ8-000/2J 2.25 k 1805-016: 12..8¡ :>ot.n © f,' ~ H33-<XXJ9-roO/S) 3.39 Ar: ........ /l!.S.l.R.W.M.O. CAAAl.. NO. 18 B22~13 .... 30 3Ot.5 .... SMALLWOOD AVENUE MSBU -5- ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: '-' ..I Agenda Request 68 Item Number Date: Feb 5, 2002 Consent Regular Public Presentation Leg. [ X ] ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ Board of County Commissioners Community Development ent Director Consider Draft Ordinance 02-009 Amending Section 8.00.03, Particular Permitted Accessory Structures and uses in Residential, Agricultural and Planned Unit Development Districts, to permit the storage of one recreational piece of equipment in a front yard on a paved surface for properties located in the unincorporated areas of the County Draft Ordinance 02-009, proposes to amend Section 8.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to permit the storage of one piece of recreational equipment in a front yard on a paved surface for properties located in the unincorporaled areas of the County. As the Board is aware, the County Commission has for the past several months been interested in bringing forward regulations and standards that would permit a property owner to store one piece of recreational equipment, as defined in the code, in a front yard provided that the equipment was located on a paved surface. These regulations are intended to apply to those parts of the County that are not otherwise restricted by private deed restrictions or covenants. On January 17, 2002,.the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on Draft Ordinance 02-009. Following the public hearing in this matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency voted 7 to 1 (Heam dissenting) to approve the draft ordinance, subject to several amendments: 1. drop the length of the vehicle (referenced in paragraph F(1)) in lieu of maintaining a minimum five (5) foot setback, and; 2. add the word "functional" in front of the word "equipment" to paragraphs F(5), F(6) and F(7), and; 3. add a new section that would allow for a forty-eight (48) hour grace period for the purpose of maintaining, loading and unloading any recreational equipment as long as on a paved surface. No specific action is required by the Board al this lime. The second public hearing on Ihis matter will be on Tuesday February 19, 2002, at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. COMMISSION ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED [TI OTHER No action required County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: ~==: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator ,9;v'/ . Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND614a) '"'" ....I COUNTY COMMISSIN REVIEW: February 5. 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Administration Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Asst. Community Development Director DATE: January 30, 2002 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 02-009 Amending Section 8.00.03, Particular Permitted Accessory Structures and uses in Residential, Agricultural and Planned Unit Development Districts, to permit the storage of one recreational piece of equipment in a front yard on a paved surface for properties located in the unincorporated areas of the County Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-009, which would propose to amend Section 8.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to permit the storage of one piece of recreational equipment in a front yard on a paved surface for properties located in the unincorporated areas of the County. As the Board is aware, the County Commission has for the past several months been interested in bringing forward regulations and standards that would permit a property owner to store one piece of recreational equipment, as defined in the code, in a front yard provided that the equipment was located on a paved surface. These regulations are intended to apply to those parts of the County that are not otherwise restricted by private deed restrictions or covenants. These regulations also establish a maximum number of three (3) pieces recreational equipment, including the one (1) recreational vehicle allowed in the front yard, that may be stored on a parcel up to one acre in size. This limitation does not apply to recreational vehicles stored in enclosed structures. For the purpose of this code, recreational equipment is to be defined as follows: . Recreation Equipment: means boats, personal watercraft, trailers and items on trailers, utility trailers, recreational vehicles, and similar vehicles or items. On January 17, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commissionl Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on Draft Ordinance 02-009. Following the public hearing in this matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency voted 7 to 1 (Hearn dissenting) to approve the following motion: Mr. Lounds moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the Sf. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners that they grant approval to Draft Ordinance 02-009 with several amendments: 1. drop the length of the vehicle (referenced in paragraph F(1)) in lieu of maintaining a minimum five (5) foot setback, and; 2. add the word "functionar in front of the word "equipment" to paragraphs F(5), F(6) and F(!), and; 3. add a new section that would allow for a forty-eight (48) hour grace period for the purpose of maintaining, loading and unloading any recreational equipment as long as on a paved surface. '-' """ January 30, 2002 Page 2 Subject: Draft Ordinance 02-009 amending the 51. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 8.00.03, Particular Permitted Accessory Structures storage recreational equipment in a front yard The effect of this motion would be to place no length restrictions on any piece of recreational equipment stored in the front yard, but that piece of equipment could be no closer than five (5) feet to the fronl property line. In addition, item #3 above would introduce a new section that would allow for the short term placement of a piece of recreation equipment, in the front yard while that equipment was being loaded or unloaded by the owner or occupant or guest of the owner or occupant of the property upon which the recreational equipment is parked. The genesis of this discussion dealt with issues related to recreational vehicles and the ability of someone to temporally locate a unit in their driveway while they loaded or unloaded the vehicle. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. No specific action is required by the Board at this time. This meeting is for the purpose of accepting public comments and testimony and providing any direction to amend or otherwise modify this draft ordinance. The second publiC hearing on this matter will be on Tuesday February 19, 2002, at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. If you have any questions, please let me know. DJMI OR_02-009_MEM02(h) ce: County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Planning Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 "" ORDINANCE NO. 02-009 ..",,; AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00 "DEFINITION" TO INCLUDE THE DEFINITION OF PERSONAL WATERCRAFT AND RECREATION EQUIPMENT;· BY AMENDING SECTION 8.00.03 PARTICULAR PERMITTED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND USES IN RESIDENTIAL, AGRICULTURAL AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS, TO PERMITTING THE STORAGE OF ONE RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT IN A FRONT YARD ON A PAVED SURFACE FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF THE COUNTY; PROVIDING CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR$EVERABILlTY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDINGiFQRFILlNG WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDIN(3iFOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PRO¥IDING<fOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determination: 1. On August 1.. 1 ~90, the BQªrøpf C()lJhty Commissioners of 51. Lucie County, Floflija,å,dopted thêiSt.L.uciê County Land Development Code. Ordinance 1I02-009a Draft #1 Th~l3oard of'(];Q\..l.~tyCommissioners has adopted certain amendments tl:)t ij'~~t. Luciê'(;Q\Unty'band Development Code, through the following Orqirnªrnqes 91-03 - 91-21 - 93-01 - 93-05 - 93-07 - 94-18 95-01 - 97-(}1 - 97-23 - March 14, 1991 Növember 7, 1991 February 16, 1993 May 25, 1993 May 25. 1993 August 16. 1994 January 10, 1995 March 4, 1997 September 2,1997 Underline is for addition Glrik>!l TI'I'ð~gll is for deletion 91-09 - 92-17 - 93-03 - 93-06 - 94-07 94-21 96-10 - 97-09 - 99-01 - May 14, 1991 June 2, 1992 February 16, 1993 May 25, 1993 June 22, 1994 August 16, 1994 August 6, 1996 October-7,1997 February 2, 1999 Page 1 PRINT DATE: 01/02102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 """ """'" 99-02 - 99-04 - 99-15 - 99-17 - 00-1 0 - 00-12 01-03 - 02-05 - April 6, 1999 August 17, 1999 July 20, 1999 September 7,1999 June 13,2000 June 13, 2000 December 18, 2001 xxxxxx xx, 2002 99-03 - 99-05 - 99-16 - 99-18 - 00-11 - 00-13 - 02-01 - August 17, 1999 July 20, 1999 July 20, 1999 November 2, 1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 xxxxx xX,2002 3. On January 17, 2002, the Local Planning Agency/ Plannìt'lgandZoning Commission held a public hearing onAhe proposed ordinance after publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune aUeasttO days prior to the hearing and recömrnel1ded that the proposed ordinance be approved. 4. On February 5, 2002, this Board held its first :') :hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publistlin~anºtice of sâ h$~ffng in the Port St. Lucie News and the TriQuneondál1Jjary 24, 20Ø2. 5. On February 19, 2002, this BoardtlelditS$~CØ~~Public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notieèof such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on FeQfuary 7, 2002. 6. The propos~çf a~$ndmen~···· ~St¡itLucie County Land Development Code are;i$Jent withtn. . ..l"têral purpose, goals, objectives and standardsô .. .... .... t. Lucie<eöûnty Comprehensive Plan and are in the bestinterestiøfit~@tU~alth safety and public welfare ofthe citizens of St. LUciØCounty,Flõt~dä~ NOW, THEREFORE;SE<I$.ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County,Florida: PART A. THE SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO READ AS FOLLOWS, INCLUDE: Underline is for addition Glrikl! TnI'O~gi'l is for deletion Ordinance #02-0098 DraH#1 Page 2 PRINT DATE: 01/0V02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 """ .J **************************** CHAPTER II DEFINITIONS Personal watercraft: means a small class A-1 or A-2 vessel as definedbv state law which uses an outboard motor. or an inboard motor powering a water iet oumo. as its orimarv source of motive Dower and which is designed to be ooerated by a oersollsittina. st~nding.or kneeling on. or being towed behind the vessel. rather than in the conventional mannerofsittingorstanding inside the vessel. Recreation Eauioment: means boats. oersonal watercraft,trailers and items onJrailers. utility trailers, recreational vehicles. and similar vehicles or items. **************************** CHAPTE 'f ..... ACCESSORY'ANlliiT STRUCrURSS AN . 'RARY' USES 8.00.00 ACCESSE!JB"l USESf . ·'RUCTURES 8.00.03 F'~;rlCULAR peFlMI'f1'ED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND USES IN RESIDENTIAL, AI:;t;!'ÇUÞTURAL, ANDl::'~NNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS Permitted accessory structures and uses include: A. Non-commercial garages¡parking lots, and parking areas, together with related circulation elements. B. Enclosed storage structures and greenhouses. C. A child's plaYhouse or gazebo. D. Non-comrnércial parks, playgrounds and athletic areas. Under1ine is for addition Otlikc TI" O~,, , is for deletion Ordinance #02-oo9a Draft #1 Page 3 PRINT DATE: 01/02/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 '-' ~ E. Private swimming pools and bathhouses, provided that the swimming pool, or the entire property on which it is located, shall be walled or fenced to prevent uncontrolled access to such swimming pool from the street or from adjacent properties. F. Outdoor storage of recreational equipment boats, trailers, or recl eational vehicles provided tnat such storage ~uea shall not be located in a front yard and provided tnat sucn boats, trailers, or vel,icles snail not be used for living, sleeping, or nousekeepÎl ,g purposes, subject to the following restrictions: L h A maximum of three (3) rec~~ational equipment including the one (1) recreational vehicleallowedinithe frontvard may be stored on a parcel exce tthattherešhall be no ion orne nu ber of recreational vehicles allowed in unênclÔsed stru 16t or arcel of more than one 1 acre rovided thålrec:œational ve must be arked at least one hundred (100) feetfrortlány publicštl"eet. This limitation shall not apply to recreational "éhielésistored in enclosed structures. ~ Recreational eauipmêhtshall not be used for livino. sleepino or housekeeping purposes. Recreationaleol.lipment must be owned or used by the owner or occupant or guest of the owner or occupant of the property upon which the recreational equipment is parked. located or stored. and must be for the personal off-site use of the owner or occupant or ouest. rather than for rent or hire. 5; Recreational eauipment must have a valid motor vehicle license or Underline is for addition Gfrika Througll is for deletion Ordinance #02-oo9a Draft #1 Page 4 PRINT DATE: 01/02102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 '-' ..., registrations at all times as reauired bv law. §.... Recreational eauipment shall not be stored on drums. barrels. concrete blocks. lumber or similar devices which cause the storage of the recreational eauipment to be deemed unsafe. L.. No inoperative recreational eauipment may be stored or parked on the paved surface. For the purpose of this Code. recreational equipment shall be deemed inoperative if it has removed or flat tires: partial or complete dismantling or removal of parts: broken glass: missing maior parts such as Iiahts. doors. hoods. or motor parts essential for the lawfuFandsafe operation of the recreational eauipmenLThe positioning of the recreational equipment in other than an upright or opera.ble manner or lack ofàcÜfrèht license plate or current registration . dooal . shall raise a rebuttable presumption that the recreational eauipmenFisinooerable. G. P~iyate....,ater andseWape utility SØry19ØS provided that they are for the sole use of the particurarprivate development, are not intended to be a sub-regional system, and do not involve industrial wastèWateras defined. H. Swimming beaches. Non-commercial docks and boat houses. I. J. Home occupations subject to the requirements of Section 8.01.00. K. Historic and monument sites. -------------------------------- Underline is for addition' Strike Thl'OtJiO l , is for deletion Ordinance #02-oo9a Draft #1 Page 5 PRINT DATE: 01/02102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 PART B. '-' ." Section 8.00.00 Accessory Uses and Structures CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portiOns of this ordinance. IHhiSOrdlnance or any provision thereof shall beheld to be inapplicable to any person , property, orcircumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other persót'jiproperty, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable in the unincØf' :)oratêdarea of PART E. County. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENt OF SlAtE. The Clerk be and is hereby directeçffOrthwith t9'send a cefrtified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws,Depart01él')J of StatEJ, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART EFFECTIVE DA're. This ordinance shall take effeèt upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. . After motion and second,thevote on this ordinance was as follows: Ordinance #02-OO9a Draft#' Chairman Doug Coward xx Vice Chairman Cliff Barnes xx -------------------------------- Underline is lor addition OlrilcG T"lõ~gl, is lor deletion Page 6 PRINT DATE 01/02102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ié '-" "WI Section 8.00.00 Accessory Uses and Structures Commissioner Paula Lewis XX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XX PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Code and CompiledLaws, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", orother appropriateword, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or reletterédtoaccomplish such interttion; provided, however, that parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COt:JNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney DJM OHI09a(LndcodOl -H) Underline is for addition Ðtl ike TI,rough is for deletion Ordinance #02-OO9a Draft #1 Page 7 PRINT DATE: 01/02102 .~¡>\~nr!l"'¡d~~ff1'l- ~.",....".. '.'" " ., ¡¡~~''à ~J:,lµ ù U~, '-' , ,¡~"'r iO ,",,,[';-'-' "7°t,II"'G Pl..M¡;'¡':NG & :~. 'hi' CmMlJii5SmN fit'PROV AL AGENDA ITEM 7: ORDINANCE 02-009 - Amendine Section 8.00.03 - TemoorarvlJses I Boats: Dennis Murphy, Assistant Community Development Director, stated Agenda Item # 7 was to consider Draft Ordinance 02-009, which would propose to amend Section 8.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to permit the storage of one piece of recreational equipment in a front yard on a paved surface for properties located in the unincorporated areas of the County. As the Commission is aware, the Board of County Commissioners has for the past several months been interested in bringing forward regulations and standards that would permit a property owner to store one piece of recreational equipment, as defined in the code, in a front yard provided that the equipment was located on a paved surface. These regulations are intended to apply to those parts of the County that are not otherwise restricted by private deed restrictions or covenants. These regulations also establish a maximum number of three (3) pieces of recreational equipment, including the one (1) recreational vehicle allowed in the front yard, that may be stored on a parcel up to one acre in size. This limitation does not apply to recreational vehicles stored in enclosed structures. Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission I Local Planning Agency forward to the Board of County Commissioners a recommendation on Draft Ordinance 02-009, which will permit the storage of one piece of recreational equipment in a front yard on a paved surface for properties located in the unincorporated areas of the County. Mr. Hearn asked if the Board of County Commissioners are in favor of this ordinance. Mr. Murphy explained that the Board was interested in bringing this forward through the public hearing process and the Board has not given any indication, on way or the other, regarding this ordinance. Mr. Akins questioned if the implementation of this ordinance would affect any existing restrictions by homeowners associations. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith stated that on page 5 of the draft ordinance it specifically points out that this would not affect any prior deed restrictions that are more restrictive. Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing. Mr. David Tillman, 5407 Palm Drive, stated that he has lived here for almost 50 years and that this is the only area with the current restriction. He also stated that he was speaking on behalf of the Fort Pierce Sport Fishing Club. He continued that Martin and Indian River County, City of Fort Pierce and City of Port St. Lucie do not have the current type of restrictions there, only the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County. He stated that having the equipment on paved surfaces is an asset because if there are any leaks or anything, they can be seen. If the equipment is on the grass, it is not easily seen. He stated that per the National Marine Industries Association, St. Lucie County. as of 1999, has 11,000 vessels registered and 85% of those are boats on trailers, which mean approximately 9,350 boats, are kept at home. He continued that not changing this ordinance would affect the dealers and manufacturers of the area. He also stated that the economic impact of the marine industry in the State of Florida is 14.1 billion dollars. He questioned why the County allows as many registered vehicles in their driveway as they want to but cannot put a boat in the driveway under the argument of child safety when boats are usually jacked up into the air to allow for drainage. He continued that having four (4) sport utilitý'vehicles in his driveway that cannot be seen around is legal but a boat, on its trailer, which can be seen under is not allowed. Mr. Hearn asked how many of the boats that are on trailers are affected by the existing ordinance and cannot get them in the backyard. Mr. Tillman stated that he would guess approximately 1/3 of them may be affected. P & Z Meeting January 17,2002 Page 14 r, r'1o, ;o,~ltf.""r? f7-? n\ ~ ~ :,::", "~¡I;( ~:;! "f ~,-~~lu IUlIIIØ:II '-' (~. c......, " "~,,,.,' ('~q:: ~''':'''l''; Tr"l ;)í..' t.;.: \.".I!l ~ V " ".." >.;r> 11 7Gi\lING f\..~)~~~{:l;¿~] .,.,:( t:'~{JlOVl\t l'MMISSmN A:"rl\u n Mr. Bob Hancock, a St. Lucie County resident for almost seventeen (17) years read k~aragraph from the Florida Recreational Salt Water Fishing Regulations, July 2001 issue. "723 of the 4,549 world records are from Florida as listed by the International Game Fish Association. This is far greater than any other state or country. Florida ranks first (1st) for the number of people who fish in salt water - 2,255,171. This is more than double any other state in the United States. Florida ranks fust (151) in the country for the number of days anglers spend fishing in salt water. 25,139,988, this too is more than double any other state in the U.S. Over three (3) times more non-residential angler trips were taken in Florida than any other state - 2.8 million. Florida ranks first (1 st) in the country in boating purchases, such as boats, 760 million. outboard motors 404,522,000, boat trailers 23,584,000 and miscellaneous marine accessories 221,479. Florida has over 2,100 marinas ranking it number one (1) in the country. " Mr. Charlie Myers, 7104 Eden Road, Lakewood Park, said that he has been there since June 1974. He stated that he could not put a boat in his side yard because he has trees planted there and would be encroaching on his neighbors property. He continued that he has been having problems with the existing ordinance since 1998 and has been trying to change it. He stated that Dennis Bunt gave him a copy of 4,300 complaints that they received about Code Enforcement issues just in Lakewood Park in the past eight (8) months. He advised that he chose Lakewood Park because it wasn't a deed restricted or gated community. He stated that he felt this new ordinance would be a fair compromise for everyone. Mr. Lounds asked Mr. Myers if he had a pad for his boat and Mr. Myers replied that he has a double wide concrete driveway. Mr. Brian Combs stated he lives on Atlantic Beach Boulevard, North Beach and previously lived in Lakewood Park for twenty years. He stated that boat owners pay more taxes than non-boat owners. They pay taxes on the boat purchase and registration, trailer purchase and registration, bait, tackle and gas. He continued that most homeowners do not have the ability to get their boat and trailer in the backyard. He also said that having a boat in the side or back yard, on the grass, kills it and with the swales, it is difficult to get a boat over those. He stated that he felt that the Homeowners Associations speak for themselves and not for the actual homeowners. He questioned the portion of the ordinance regarding more restrictive communities and Ms. Mackenzie-Smith explained that was in reference to deed-restrictions. He also stated that he has a six (6) inch thick, 75-foot concrete driveway that he is not currently allowed to place his boat upon. Mr. Keith Prosky, Lakewood Park resident, stated that it would not be possible for him to get a boat in his backyard like many others in the area. He also stated that he did not feel it was fair to tell those that don't have any possible way to get a boat in their yard, that they cannot own one, because they aren't allowed to put it in the front on the driveway. Ms. Lee Primerano, River Park Homeowners Association stated they were concerned about the number of total items would be allowed in the front yard. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith explained that the term being used in the ordinance is recreational equipment and would allow one (1) on a paved surface, in the front yard along with the new restriction of a maximum of three (3) pieces of equipment on the property all together. Under the current ordinance, you may have as many as you want on the property in the back yard. Ms. Primerano also stated that she feels there may be a visibility issue (especially for home iñ River Park) for people backing out. She continued that having that much paved area in a front yard cuts down on the amount of water that can absorbed therefore increasing storm water run oft She also questioned if there is any way to keep people from parking their recreational equipment in their driveways and then parking their vehicles on the grass to avoid adding a secondary paved surface. Mr. Billy Brown of Indian River Estates stated that it is not possible for him to place his boat on the side or back of his home and if this ordinance were not approved, he would have to sell his boat. He stated P & Z Meeting January 17, 2002 Page 15 r r ""__"';:"~: ~l';i~~ I'; .." "'., .',,~ .' .... .' _" -. . '!1f1!!... ") " :...;;~' ;~:." '1 h ~' "" ,',.. " :",.," ".... ~t¡;;,;·,:¡,~,¡s & ZONING r ,._,-\.~." .. ...."'''''.'1 nt rDMr~¡SSmN Ath\U\I i-I that with the oak trees in his yard and the size of his lot, he would not be able to pra'ég'lRe boat on the side of his house without ending up on the neighbors property line. He continued that he doesn't have any problems with keeping the boat on a paved surface in the front of his home. He stated that he feels having the boat shows his progress in life. . "¿,'_:';;';¡ '-' Mr. Bill Wilson, a Port St. Lucie resident stated that the city does have specific ordinances governing recreational equipment. He continued that they must be parked in the driveway or ten (10) feet inside the rear yard. He questioned if this ordinance would include motor homes. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith explained that it does. He stated that he feels parking these types of equipment in the front of the home does detract from the property values and that is why a lot of homeowners associations and condominium associations have banned this type of equipment all together. Chairman Matthes asked if his issue is with all recreational equipment or just motor homes. Mr. Wilson stated that he doesn't feel that anything should be parked in the front yard. Chairman Matthes stated that he resides in the city of Port St. Lucie and they allow it. Mr. Wilson stated that the city states it has to be in the driveway or to the right hand side of the house. Chairman Matthes explained that this ordinance is suggesting they be parked on a paved surface, not in the grass of the front yard. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith did confirm that the intent of the ordinance is that the recreational equipment must be on a paved surface perpendicular to the roadway. Ms. Vickie Tillman stated that she and her husband Bud Tillman own St. Lucie Outboard Marine and have been in the county since 1956. She stated that she would like to see this ordinance be forwarded to the Commission with a recommendation of approval because they feel it will greatly affect their business because they sell trailerable boats up to thirty (30) feet. She also stated that there are two (2) major trailer companies in the area and they utilize their trailers and products greatly and this would affect all of them. Mr. McCurdy asked Ms. Tillman if a trailer would make a twenty-five (25) foot boat exceed the ordinance maximum of twenty-six (26) feet. Ms. Tillman stated that she believed a twenty-five (25) foot boat on a trailer would most likely measure thirty feet (30) in length. Chairman Matthes asked staff if "recreational equipment less than twenty-six feet (26) in length" would actually include the trailer. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith stated that it includes the phrase, "items on trailers" to treat them as one under defined terms on page three (3). Mr. Skip Lashon, Sales Director for Maverick Boat Company stated that marine manufacturing is also a large part of the community. He continued that his company builds about sixteen (16) different model boats, twenty-four (24) feet and under that are all trailerable. They employ one hundred seventy (170) people, maintain fifty-two (52) marine retailers around the country and their third largest dealer is located in Stuart and approximately 80% of the units he sells are to those in St. Lucie County. He stated that he feels this new ordinance is very important and can affect the sales of boats in the county. Ms. Nancy Spalding, Coral Cove Homeowners Association, stated that she would like to see the existing ordinance remain the same. She continued that the City of Ft. Pierce has done a great job keeping their communities looking great and feels this ordinance will not do that for their communities on North Beach. She also stated that she is concerned with the aesthetics of the community and she feels havinp recreational equipment in the front of the property will decrease property values. Chairman Matthes asked Mr. Trias what the City's policy is and Mr. Trias explained that their ordinances are very comparable to the new ordinance that has been presented here tonight. Mr. Jim Andrews, Lakewood Park resident stated he has a 24-Y2 foot boat and does not have the ability to place it on either side of his home. He said that he was concerned about the children that will be affected by this because the cost of docking a boat in a marina is quite high and the hours of operation can be difficult if you don't work a standard 9-5 shift. If the boat were at your home, the time of night that you take it out would not be an issue. Mr. Lounds asked Mr. Andrews if his boat was on a paved surface and P & Z Meeting January 17, 2002 Page 16 (:' """'-"-'C' 'I' ,,' ,~{i/::~~';;'l=~~t (~ - ~ 1 G 111. .....,......;",,".' '" LQ~LN i ' .,~.; . ',' ~ \;.", -- r.ö'Mrj¡ìssiGN hPPROV Al he stated that he has it on his concrete double driveway. Mr. McCurdy stated that ne would not be in compliance with the ordinance due to the length of the boat and the trailer. Mr. Andrews confirmed that is correct. '-' "r:.~~.~r~, C:: . ~.,",~ ~¡1 r..:~ ..l,',,;cQ Mr. Ed Lewis, 3111 Sunrise Boulevard stated that his family has been living here for many generations and there are no vehicles as beautiful as a boat. He also stated that his sod is completely dead on the side of his house where he has had his sea craft parked and he feels the boat would look much better sitting in the front of the house instead of having dead grass. He continued that the grass in his backyard would never be able to support the weight of the boat, especially during the rainy season and would most likely end up stuck because of it. Mr. Bob Brian stated he has lived in Indian River Estates for twenty-seven (27) years and that having his boat on the side of his property tears up the grass and leaves ruts in the ground. He continued that he doesn't feel the length should be an issue. He suggested rewording it to the trailer tongue having to be back off the property line five feet instead of how long the boat is once it is on a trailer. Mr. Bob Bangert of Holiday Pines Homeowners Association stated that he has owned a boat himself for many years and is not against it, his concern is where the boat is stored. He advised that he would not consider most of St. Lucie County fishing communities and a large percentage of the boats manufactured in the county are actually shipped out of the county. He also stated that fishing tournaments do bring a lot of money into the county but he doesn't feel that has anything to do with where a boat is stored. He continued that Commissioner Barnes requested the revision of the ordinance because the present ordinance puts too much of a load on Code Enforcement. He also stated that the Code Enforcement Board stated that they wanted to leave the existing ordinance the way that it is. He then showed some poster boards to the Commission that had pictures showing boats, motor homes and RV's in the driveway. He asked if work trailers are included under this ordinance. Chairman Matthes stated that he didn't believe work trailers were categorized as being "recreational equipment". He then stated that he feels if someone can afford a $33,000 boat, they should be able to afford $20 to $25 a month to store it instead of having it in their front yard. He questioned if there are any restrictions to moving vehicles onto the grass so they can put the equipment in the driveway. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith stated that there are no ordinances right now that restrict them from parking on their lawn if they want to, so this ordinance wouldn't stop them either. He gave a photo to the Commission and Staff showing a large motor home in a driveway and stated there is no way to legally park items of this size in a fifty foot driveway if they have to be ten feet off the property line given the existing right-of-ways. He stated he is also concerned with the decreased visibility with an item of this size in the driveway and the ability to stop a motor vehicle fast enough to avoid hitting a child. Chairman Matthes stated that usually if a driver is obeying the speed limit in those residential communities they should be able to stop. He also stated that he is not aware of any homeowner's group who support this ordinance revision, except possibly St. Lucie Village. He continued that there may be a lot of boat owners in the county, but he doesn't feel they would represent over 10% of the total residents. The population of St. Lucie County, as of the last census was 192,695 and if approximately 9,000 of them own a boat, that is less than 10%. Mr. Lounds stated that he doesn't feel that everyone that makes up the population owns a lot and he continued that this new ordinance actually addresses many of the issues shown in the photographs and they show there is a need for this. Mr. Akins also explained that this ordinance would not affect those in deed-restricted communities. Mr. Ray Shepard, 5200 Eagle Drive in Holiday Pines stated that he has lived in Fort Pierce for forty-five P & Z Meeting January 17,2002 Page 17 ",'~, ":~", :,/...~-'n, <-,.", : e;::-,;.Q:"!I ." ~r!f""" C'..:.(-,l ~'''1 ~ tJ ~ "'JJL~) g G \JÜ\NNING & ZGN\!~ CaMfÆSSI!lN A?PROV At years and stores his motor home for $35 a month. He stated that when they bought their property in Holiday Pines, they asked about ovemight loading and unloading his motor home and they advised him there was no problem with that even though it is deed-restricted from keeping them there. He continued that there are people in the community who caLI Code Enforcement the minute he leaves to say he is in violation and he has been cited several times because of it. He stated loading and unloading a motor home does take some time and according to the County Commissioners, the minute the motor home is turned off, it is considered being stored, therefore making him in violation. He continued that his motor home is thirty-four feet long and would not allow him to store it in his driveway anyway under this ordinance, but he would like to see something specifying a time for overnight loading and unloading. "'" Mr. Richard Crew, Indian River Estates, stated he has a fourteen-foot boat and was cited back in September for having it in his driveway. He continued that the reason for that is because he is handicapped and it is virtually impossible for him to try to work with it in the side yard when he takes it out everyday and wants the existing ordinance changed. Mr. Bill Adams of Holiday Pines stated that he searched for a deed-restricted community that controlled specific elements of the area. He questioned if this ordinance only applies to those parts of the county that are not otherwise restricted by private deed restrictions. Mr. Bobby Carton stated he lives at 5106 Palm Drive in Indian River Estates and that his homeowners association does not speak for him. He continued that he is in favor of the new ordinance and that those who are not and do not reside in deed-restricted communities should not have the right to restrict them. He stated that his would like to see a small revision that states the equipment must have current registrations in order to keep them in the front of the house. Mr. David Weeks stated that he lives on a comer lot and has no side yard to park his boat in. He also advised that the size of the lot and the trees do not enable him to put it in the backyard. He continued that he is in favor of this ordinance and stated that he felt there are many other aesthetic problem areas in the county that are more important for cleaning up the area than a boat in the front yard. He stated that he chose not to live in a deed-restricted area because he didn't like the extra restrictions and to have a small boat in his yard is his idea of the American dream. Mr. Robin Thome stated he has owned a home in Lakewood Park for the last sixteen years and has a boat on a trailer in his doublewide driveway. He continued that there is no physical way for him to move the boat on the grass to the side of his home and if the ordinance remains the way it is, he would probably have to get rid of his boat so he is not in non-compliance. Mr. Ken Irish, 355 South Ocean Drive, stated that he feels the taxpayer should have the right to park their recreational equipment in their own yard on their property if they wish to. He continued that these types of equipment keep a lot of kids occupied in their free time, therefore keeping them away from drugs and other illegal activities. He also stated that if they chose to live in a deed-restricted community that doesn't allow these things, that is their choice, but he doesn't feel they shouldn't place their views and restrictions on those outside of that deed-restricted community. He asked if this ordinance would apply to someone who owns over an acre of land. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith explained that there is an exception to the ordinance that if you own more than an acre and keep the equipment at least one hundred feet (100) back from the street frontage, then you are in compliance. Seeing no one else, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing. Mr. McCurdy asked Staff how the twenty-six foot (26) length was decided and what was the intent P & Z Meeting January 17,2002 Page 18 p.. -. ~: " r.·""" ~,.. .""'" ,,~, ': ",1 SL._1,L~jí ill Pi (;·:]'1:\1::; & ZûNlNG f"',:':, ¡,.,": ~'i''íìN A.PPROìJ At ""Oi,,,.'í.JJ1ul behind that specific number. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith eXplained that it was a ComprOmIse, originally when first drafted there was no length restriction, but there were some requests to add a length restriction so there weren't fifty-foot RV's in front of the standard size home. She continued that there is also a height restriction so that the equipment isn't taller than the home. Mr. McCurdy asked if the length restrictions were due to safety concerns and Ms. Mackenzie-Smith stated it was safety, aesthetics and comparison to similar ordinances around the state. She also stated they added the minimum five foot (5) setback to allow for safety and sight. Mr. Merritt questioned what the restrictions are on the current ordinance. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith stated it does not allow any boat in the front yard; they must be in the side or back yard and does allow for as many as you want on the property. Mr. Jones stated that he felt it would be easier to enforce this new ordinance if the length specifications were regarding the actual boat length, not including the trailer and keep the setback the same. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith explained that Code Enforcement felt it was enforceable keeping the trailer and boat as one item in regards to the length restriction. Mr. McCurdy stated that the length, on a trailer, could vary tremendously depending on how the boat is placed. Mr. Lounds stated he felt it would be best to eliminate the length restriction and focus on the setback. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith stated that most self-propelled motor homes are over the twenty-six feet length. Mr. Lounds stated that someone made a comment about adding text regarding unregistered vehicles and he found that there is already a provision for that in the ordinance. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith verified that was correct and that there is also a provision in paragraph seven (7) stating they cannot be inoperable. Mr. Hearn questioned if the present code allows for any hardship relief. Ms. Mackenzie-Smith stated there is nothing in the existing code. Mr. Hearn asked if they might go to the Board of Adjustment for some help. Mr. Murphy explained that the Board of Adjustment is limited in its authority and granting waivers and relief are usually based on dimensional standards, not use standards. Mr. Hearn stated that if this ordinance were passed they would need to address Section 8.00.02, Dimension and Location Regulations of the Land Development code and change the language in Section A dealing with accessory structures and uses in the front yard. Mr. Murphy stated they would review it and see if it may cause conflict. Mr. Hearn stated that he felt this might be something that the Board of County Commissioners may want to leave up to the voters to decide. Mr. Akins questioned the enforceability by the Code Enforcement department and how they will handle these types of violations. Mr. Murphy explained that they usually handle violations on a complaint basis; if they receive one, they will take the appropriate measurements and verify if it exceeds the measurement restrictions or setback issues, then any appropriate violation notices would be issued, if necessary. Mr. Merritt questioned if page 4, Section F, number 2, regarding parking at least one hundred (100) feet from any public street would also apply to those living in Indian River Estates because the lots are only 85xlOO. Mr. Murphy explained that provision is in regards to lots over one (1) acre. Mr. Merritt stated that he felt it needed to be reworded to be clearer. Mr. Lounds stated that after considering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, including staff comments, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to Ordinaúce 02-009 with several provisions: drop length of the vehicle in lieu of either a five (5) or eight (8) foot setback and add the word "functional" to # 5 and # 6. Motion seconded by Mr. Jones. Mr. McCurdy stated that Section F, # 1, should have a provision added to allow a 24-hour period for loading and unloading purposes. Mr. Lounds stated he would not have a problem adding that to his P & Z Meeting January 17,2002 Page 19 '-' ""'" (1) February 5, 2002 Good Evening: Mr. Chairman Coward and Board Members; My Name is Arlene Goodman and I reside with my husband, Jeff, at 4412 Pressler Lane; Ft. Pierce. Re: Ordinance # 02-004 amending the Conditional use portion of the Commercial Neighborhood Zoning text: After reading the Planning & ·Zoning Board's minutes of their meeting on December 20th, 2001; I see that the Board voted 6 against the change and only 2 in favor of the change. This is not a close vote, but a clear vote requesting the Board of County Commissioners to deny this petition. Also Staff is S TILL recommending the denial of this request. 2 \w ...." My husband, Jeff and I, respectfully request you deny the petition. Commercial Neighborhood Zoning is a good buffer between homes and commercial uses and is less intrusive than Commercial General Zoning, which does allow for the serving of beer, wine and distilled beverages with meals. The change requested by the applicant in Lakewood Park will affect all of the unincorporated areas of 8t. Lucie County where "restaurants" that serve beer and wine with meals are located in residential neighborhoods. '-" ...,¡ 3 EXAMPLES: St. Lucie Draft House; R.J. Gators and Harpers all serve meals and all have a "bar" area in their restaurant. (these restaurants are not in neighborhoods, but are only examples). As the evening wears on .... the food service dwindles and the drinking is more in demand than the food. There is nothing wrong with these restaurants; however, I do not want one on the property at the intersection of Oleander Avenue and Midway Road where there is now Commercial Neighborhood Zoning and which abuts our property at 4901 Oleander Avenue which we have owned since 1975 and where we raised 4 children. It all comes down to what types of business do we want at our side yards, back yards and across the street? '-' ....J 4 The then sitting Board, while working on the Comprehensive Plan decided distilled beverage serving restaurants was not one of those businesses and I feel we should not change that. A conditional use does give some control, but not enough. As Ms. Young, County Attorney, stated at the P&Z meeting and I quote: "IF A (future) (my word) PETITION MEETS THE TECHINICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE AND THERE IS NO VALID REASON FOR DENYING THE CONDITIONAL USE, (request) (my word) THEN THE BOARD WOULD HA VE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PETITION" This means all requests in the future would most likely be a done deal. ........ 5 ....J I do understand where Mr. Morales is coming from, but for the user of the "Frosty Mug", Mr. Trefelner there are many empty buildings that can be used for the requested purpose. Again, the P & Z Board recommended the Board of County Commissioners deny the request by a 6 to 2 vote. Your Staff recommends the denial of the request. I too, along with my husband, request the Board deny the petition to change the conditional use portion of the commercial Zoning Text. Thank you for your time. Sincerely {bJh« ~ Jeffery and Arlene Goodman 4412 Pressler Lane Ft. Pierce, Fl. 34982 ~ -.... ~ ..,.¡ $~ Agenda Request Item Number Date: Feb 5, 2002 Consent Regular Public Presentation Leg. [ X ] [ [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 02-004 amending the St. Lucie County d Oevelopment Code by amending Section 3.01.03(0)(7), Commercial Neighborhood, Conditional Uses. to add New Paragraph F thai would provide for the Establishment and Operation of Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages as an Accessory Use to a Restaurant and! or Civic, Social and Fratemal Organization) as a Conditional Use. BACKGROUND: Draft Ordinance 02-004 proposes to amend Section 3.01.03(0)(7) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for the establishment and operation of "drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant andl or civic, social and fratemal organization)" as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning district. The proposed amendment to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code has been submitted by Mr. Wiiliam Morales, regarding property in the Lakewood Park area of the unincorporated County. Currently the sale of alcoholic beverages in the CN zoning district is lim~ed to two types of uses. and only under very strict circumstances. . Section 3.01.03(0)(7)(d)(2) of the County's Land Development Code, provides that a business engaged in the retail sale of food products may also sell undistilled alcoholic beverages. There is a specific notation in the last part of this section that prohibits the sale of liquor products. . Section 3.01.03(0)(8)(a) of the County's Land Development Code, provides that a business, permitted as an eating establishment under the Land Development Code. may also sell undistilled alcoholic beverages. but only as an accessory use to the eating establishment. While there is not a specific a notation to the sale of liquor products as there use outlined above, the '. term "undistilled" has been relied upon by the County to lim~ the sale of alcoholic beverages to essentially beer and wine only. The above lim~ations were first added to the CN Zoning District when the district ~self was created as part of the general zoning text revisions approved by the County in 1984. Ouring the discussion on the establishment of this new zoning district there were specific actions taken to limit the sales of distilled sprits in this zoning district. The general consensus of a number ot community interest groups and the Board of County Commissioners at that time was that it was not appropriate to perm~ the sale of this type of alcoholic beverage in areas that were to meet the intent of the CN zoning district. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: At the December 14, 2001 review of this petition by the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency, and by a 6-2 vote of the members present, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency voted to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners not approve Draft Ordinance 02-004. Staff recommends that the Board Of County Commissioners not approve Draft Ordinance 02-004. which proposes to amend Section 3.01.03(0)(7) of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for the establishment and operation of "drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant andl or civic, social and fraternal organization)" as a Conditional Use in the Commerciai Neighborhood (CN) zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: OJ D COMMISSION ACTION: APPROVED 0 DENIED (Hutchinson Absent) OTHER ( 4 - 0 ) Approved to deny request to chanqe code. (/J:/ ~URRENCE: I L¡~ Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND612a) "" ..."", County Commission Review: February 5. 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Administration Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Asst. Community Development Director DATE: January 16, 2002 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 02-004 amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 3.01.03(0)(7), Commercial Neighborhood, Conditional Uses, to add New Paragraph F that would provide for the Establishment and Operation of Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages as an Accessory Use to a Restaurant and! or Civic, Social and Fraternal Organization) as a Conditional Use. Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-004 which would propose to amend Section 3.01.03(0)(7) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for the establishment and operation of "drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and! or civic, social and fraternal organization)" as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning district. The proposed amendment to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code has been submitted· by Mr. William Morales, regarding property in the Lakewood Park area of the unincorporated County. While the particulars of the submitted petition appear to be focused and directed towards one particular business enterprise in the Lakewood Park area of the County, our review of the submitted amendment request is more global in nature. We must use a global type review since if approved, this Text Amendment would apply not only to the specific instances of Mr. Morales's property, but also all other areas of the County now zoned, or potentially zoned, under the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning designation in the future. In beginning our assessment of this proposed petition, we find that we must first review the purpose statement of the CN zoning district. This statement reads as follows: Q. CN COMMERCML.NBGHBORHOOD ,. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for limited retail trade and service activities covering a relatively small area and that is intended to serve the population living in surrounding neighborhoods. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may ~ ....., January 16, 2002 Page 2 Subject: Draft Ordinance 02-004 amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 3.01.03(0)(7), Commercial Neighborhood, Conditional Uses be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. Currently the sale of alcoholic beverages in the CN zoning district is limited to two types of uses, and only under very strict circumstances. · Section 3.01.03(0)(7)(d)(2) of the County's Land Development Code, provides that a business engaged in the retail sale of food products may also sell undistilled alcoholic beverages. There is a specific notation in the last part of this section that prohibits the sale of liquor products. · Section 3.01.03(0)(8)(a) of the County's Land Development Code, provides that a business, permitted as an eating establishment under the Land Development Code, may also sell undistilled alcoholic beverages, but only as an accessory use to the eating establishment. While there is not a specific a notation to the sale of liquor products as there use outlined above, the term "undistilled" has been relied upon by the County to limit the sale of alcoholic beverages to essentially beer and wine only. The above limitations were first added to the CN Zoning District when the district itself was created as part of the general zoning text revisions approved by the County in 1984. During the discussion on the establishment of this new zoning district there were specific actions taken to limit the sales of distilled sprits in this zoning district. The general consensus of a number of community interest groups and the Board of County Commissioners at that time was that it was not appropriate to permit the sale of this type of alcoholic beverage in areas that were to meet the intent of the CN zoning district. In reviewing the proposed text amendments to permit the sale of distilled alcoholic spirits, even as a conditional use, the applicant has failed to adequately demonstrate that such a change, when looked at in a global nature, would in fact not be in violation of the purpose statement of the CN zoning district. The applications focus on one particular business enterprise does not appear to be sufficient justification to change a rule of general application throughout the County. At the December 14, 2001 review of this petition by the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency, and by a 6 to 2 vote of the members present, the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency voted to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners not aoorove Draft Ordinance 02-004. On January 15, 2002, this Board held the first of two required public hearings oñ this proposed amendment to the Land Development Code. At that hearing the board accepted public comments and testimony on this proposed amendment. Summarizing the comments presented at this hearing, the majority of the speakers at this public hearing spoke out against the proposed amendments citing concerns about the expanded potential for incompatible uses in the community's neighborhoods, where the majority of the CN zoning designations are currently and likely to be located. \w ....,.J January 16, 2002 Page 3 Subject: Draft Ordinance 02-004 amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 3.01.03(0)(7), Commercial Neighborhood, Conditional Uses Staff recommends that the Board Of County Commissioners not approve Draft Ordinance 02- 004, which proposes to amend Section 3.01.03(Q)(7) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for the establishment and operation of "drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and! or civic, social and fraternal organization)" as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning district. Staff further notes that should the petitioners wish to seek the option to sell alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and/ or civic, social and fraternal organization at the location referenced in this application, then perhaps the more appropriate route to take would be to submit an application for change in Land Use and Zoning to Commercial General for their property. If such a designation were approved, then the sale of alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and! or civic, social and fraternal organization would be use open to them. SUBMITTED: DJM/ OR_02-004_MEM03(h) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager William Morales 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 '-' .."" ORDINANCE NO. 02-004 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION.· 3.01.03(Q)(7), COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, CONDITIONAL USES, TO ADD NEW PARAGRAPH F THAT WOULD PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF DRINKING PLACES (ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO A RESTAURANT AND/OR CIVIC,SOCIAL AND FRATERNAL ORGANIZATION) AS A CONDITIONALIJSE, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; PROVI.DING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDIN.G'FORANEFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION; AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County CommissionérsofSt.Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determination: 1. On August 1, 1990, theBoardofCountyCommissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted the St.Lucie County Land Development Code. 2. The Board ofCollnty Comrrti~~i()nershas adopted certain amendments to the St. LuQiepounty Lal'1diIDElyglopmel'1t Code, through the followil'1g Ordil'1al'1cês 91-03 - 91-21 - 93-01 - 93-05 - 93-07 - 94-18 - 95-01 - 97-01 - 97 -23 - 99-02 - 99-04 - 99-15 Mãreh14,1991 Noven'lbli!r7,1991 February 16, 1993 May 25,1993 Ma,y 25, 1993 August 16, 1994 January 10, 1995 March 4, 1997 September 2, 1997 April 6, 1999 August 17, 1999 July 20, 1999 91-09 - 92-17 - 93-03 - 93-06 - 94-07 - 94-21 - 96-10 - 97-09 - 99-01 99-03 - 99-05 - 99-16 - May 14, 1991 June 2, 1992 February 16, 1993 May 25, 1993 June 22, 1994 August 16, 1994 August 6, 1996 October 7, 1997 February 2, 1999 August 17, 1999 July 20, 1999 July 20:1999 Underline is for addition Otril<o TI ,I ol:l\lh is for deletion Ordinance #02-002a Draft #1 Page 1 PRINT DATE: 12/14/01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ~ ...".¡ 99-17 00-10 00-12 - September 7, 1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 99-18 - 00-11 - 00-13 - November 2, 1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 3. On December 14, 2001, the Local Planning Agency/ Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance after publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at least 10 days priortothe hearing and recommended thatthe proposed ordinance be approved. 4. On January 15, 2002, this Board held its first public hearing onthe proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in thePort St. Lucie News and the Tribune on January3,2002. 5. On February 5, 2002, this Board held its secondpubliChearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishin~"anotice of suchhearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the TribuneorlJánuary 24, 2002. 6. The proposed amendments to theSt. Lucie GOl1nty Land Development Code are consistentwith the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and are in the best interest of thêihêalth saføty and PUblic welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BEITOR~AINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. THE SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO BEA.D AS FOLLOWS, INCLUDE: ******************************** Underline is for addition Olrilu; TI 01 o~ÎlI , is for deletion Ordinance #02-002a Draft #1 Page 2 PRINT DATE: 12/14/01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 \.. ...., 1 CHAPTER III ZONING DISTRICTS 3.00.00 ZONING DISTRICTS 3.01.03 ZONING DISTRICTS Q. CN COMMERCIAL. NEIGHBORHOOD Paragraph$ 1 through 6 - no change 7. Conditional Uses 1. Car Washes (Self Service Only),subjectto the provisions of Section 7.10.22. (SSS) b. Day care - adult (6322) - child (6351) c. Postal services. (4311) d. Retail trade: (1) Gasoline selVi¢es - accessory to retailfood stores under SIC-5411. (SSS) (2) UndistilledEiI¢6holic bev/3rEiges accessory to retail sale of food. (5921 - Except lor liquor) e. Telecommunicatio wers - SUþje~l!~j~estandards of Section 7.10.23 (SSS) 1:. Drinkin PI holic Beveraè.sjas an Accesso Use to a Restaurant and! or Civic Social andFÍ',¡itêjTi{j'tOraanizat¡OrÙ PEil"agraph 8 - no change ******************************** PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie Gounty,Countyordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in cooflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. Underline is for addition OlrikG TI ,I otJgl1 is lor deletion Ordinanœ #02-002a Draft #1 Page 3 PRINT DATE: 12/14/01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 '- ..."I PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, orvoid, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, orcircumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County'sjurisdiction. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENTa.l7iSTATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed.forthwithtosend a certifièd copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code ªhd Laws, QèpartmeQtOf State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinancashalltake effe¢tuponfiling with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION; After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward xxx Vice Chairman Cliff Barnes xxx Underline is for addition Gtrike Ttlrð~gh is for deletion Ordinance #02-002" Dr"ft#1 Page 4 PRINT DATE: 12/14101 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ~~ 37 PART H. '- .".¡I Commissioner Paula Lewis xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated intheSt. Lucie Land DeveJopemntCode, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article" or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbersd or rslettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that parts B through HshallnOlbecodified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this 18thda.yofOeeember, ~001. ATTEST: BOARD OFCOLJNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTVCLERK OJM 02-004a(Lndcod01 -H) Ordinance #02-OO2a Draft #1 CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY Underline is for addition Eltl ikG TI ,I 01:1>:11 , is for deletion Page 5 PRINT DATE: 12/14/01 , lòi. .' '- .."." Agenda Request Item Number Date: $ò Feb 5, 2002 Consent Regular Public Presentation Leg. [ X ] [ [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ ] To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: Consider Draft Ordinance 02-001 amending the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 7.09.03(e){2)(f) Landscaping And Screening, to add Cattley Guava, Common Guava, Loquat, Surinam Cherry and Rose Apple 10 the list of trees and plants that shall not be planted in SI. Lucie County FUNDS AVAILABLE: Draft Ordinance 02-001 proposes to amend Section 7.09.03 (e){2){f) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Landscaping and Screening, to add Cattley Guava, Common Guava, Loquat, Surinam Cherry and Rose Apple to the list of trees and plants that are not to be planted in St. Lucie County. The County has been requested by the Indian River Citrus League to add these listed plants to the portion of the County's Land Development Code that addresses exotic or pest type of trees and plants. The reason cited for this request is the fact the listed trees are considered to be host plants for the Caribbean Fruit Fly, which poses a significant threat to the local areas citrus crops. On January 17, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency held a public hearing b Draft ordinance 02-001. Following the public hearing in this matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency voted 4 to 4 on a motion of support for these new regulations. The effect of a four to four vote is that no recommendation has been provided to you from that Board. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. No specific action is required by the Board at this time. This meeting is for the purpose of accepting public comments and testimony and providing any direction to amend or otherwise modify this draft ordinance PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: No specific action is required by the Board at this time. The second public hearing on this matter will be on Tuesday February 19, 2002, at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. COMMISSION ACTION: o APPROVED D DENIED [J[] OTHER No action required. ~CURRENCE: ( -z,~ Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator ~ Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: (AGEND613a) '"'" ....." COUNTY COMMISSIN REVIEW: February 5,2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Administration Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Asst. Community Development Director DATE: January 30, 2002 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 02-001 amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 7.09.03(e)(2)(f) Landscaping And Screening, to add Cattley Guava, Common Guava, Loquat, Surinam Cherry and Rose Apple to the list of trees and plants that shall not be planted in Sl. Lucie County Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-001 which would propose to amend Section 7.09.03 (e)(2)(f) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Landscaping and Screening, to add Cattley Guava, Common Guava, Loquat, Surinam Cherry and Rose Apple to the list of trees and plants that are not to be planted in Sl. Lucie County. The County has been requested by the Indian River Citrus League to add these listed plants to the portion of the County's Land Development Code that addresses exotic or pest type of trees and plants. The reason cited for this request is the fact the listed trees are considered to be host plants for the Caribbean Fruit Fly, which poses a significant threat to the local areas citrus crops. On January 17, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on Draft Ordinance 02-001. Following the public hearing in this matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency voted 4 to 4 on a motion of support for these new regulations. The effect of a four to four vote is that no recommendation has been provided to you from that Board. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. No specific action is required by the Board at this time. This meeting is for the purpose of accepting public comments and testimony and providing any direction to amend or otherwise modify this draft ordinance. The second public hearing on this matter will be on Tuesday February 19, 2002, at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. If you have any questions, please let me know. ICP velopment Director DJMI OR_02-001_MEM02(h) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Planning Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 '-" ORDINANCE NO. 02-001 'wttI1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 7.09.00, LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING, TO PROVIDE FOR CLARIFICATION AND GENERAL AMENDMENTS AS FOLLOWS: BY AMENDING SECTION7.09.03(E)(2)(f)TO ADD CATTLEY GUAVA, COMMON GUAVA, LOQUAT, SURINAM CHERRY AND ROSE APPLE TO THE LlSTOF TREE AND PLANTS THAT SHALLNOTBE PLANTED IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY; BY PROVIDING FOQiCONFLlCTING PROVISIONS; BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMI;NlFOF STATE;PQOVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE;iØJ:l'~vleING FOR AeOPTION ANe PROVIDING FOR CODIFICAmIÐN. WHEREAS, the Board of County CommissioJi.êts of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determination: 1. On Augustl,J~90. the B?f1t~(i~tii~õtmty Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida/adopted thé'8t¡l..'.ucie County Land Development Code. 2. The Board of CountyCornmissioners has adopted certain amendments tothe$t.Lucie COl.JntyLand Development Code, through the following Ordinances Ordinance 1102-001 a Draft #1 91-03 - 91-21 - 93-01 - 93-05 - 93-07 - 94-18 - 95-01 - 97-01 f\4â.rch 14, 1991 NOvember 7, 1991 February 16, 1993 May 25, 1993 May 25, 1993 August 16, 1994 January 10,1995 March 4, 1997 91-09 - 92-17 - 93-03 93-06 - 94-07 - 94-21 - 96-10 - 97-09 - Underline is for addition Gtrikll Thro~gl'l is for deletion May 14, 1991 June 2, 1992 February 16, 1993 May 25, 1993 June 22, 1994 August 16, 1994 August 6, 1996 October 7, 1997 Page 1 PRINT DATE: 01/02/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 \,... ..., 97 -23 - 99-02 - 99-04 - 99-15 - 99-17 - 00-1 0 - 00-12 01-03 September 2, 1997 April 6, 1999 August 17, 1999 July 20, 1999 September 7, 1999 June 13,2000 June 13, 2000 December 18, 2001 99-01 99-03 99-05 99-16 - 99-18 00-11 - 00-13 - February 2, 1999 August 17, 1999 July 20, 1999 July 20, 1999 November 2, 1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 3. On January 17, 2002, the Local Planning Agency/ Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance after publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at least 10days prior to the hearing and recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved. 4. On February 5, 2002, this Board held its first public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice ofSlJch hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on January 24, 2002. 5. On February 19, 2002, this ªQ<;lrdheldHi~$second public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after pul.tmshingªn~ti¢øQfsuchhearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the TriblJhè on Feprl.Jary7,2002. 6. The proposed amenqr;nents to t9~:St. Lucie qounty Land Development Code are consistent with!t ener~!§~lJrpose, ~~als, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie Cou~> ompr~i9f¡)l'l.sivePlgrrand are in the best interest of the health safetyandFpublic welf~r~~fithecitizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE. BE ITøatl>lIII', ED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida.: PART A. SECTION 7.09.03 (E)(2)(F)OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SHALL BE AMENDEDTO READ AS FOLLOWS, INCLUDE: *******************.* Underline is for addition G1rike Thl'ðl:Jg¡' is for deletion Ordinance #02-001 a Draft #1 Page 2 PRINT DATE: 01/02/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7.09.00 7 8 7.09.03 9 10 2. 11 12 f. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Ordinance '02-001 a Draft.1 ~ ..., CHAPTER VII DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING GENERAL PROVISIONS Trees None of the following trees or olants shall be planted in S1. Lucie County. Where such species already exist, their removalshal.IÞea condition of any final development order. Melaleuca quinquenervia (Punk?f'rèè) Casuarina spp. (Australial}¡pihe) Eugenia uniflora (SurinaQ'libherrv) Syazguin iambos (rose apple) Schinusterebinthefolius (Brazilian Pepper) PSídiumsoo (Guava) {FI'Î@Oötrva iaoonica (loQuat) Pšiâium cattleianum (Cattley guava) None ofthe followil}~species, Qt~ny speciøšdesignated as Category I on the Exotic Plant Pest Counc¡J~smost re .. .... list 9f~Florida's Most Invasive Species", shall be used to meetth9;requiremøfitlìissection: Cupianopsis Anacardiodes (Carrotwood) Dalbergia sissoo (Rosewood) Acacia auriculiformis (Earleaf Acacia) Albizzia lebbeck (Woman's Tongue) Araucaria heterophylla (Norfolk Island Bishofia javanica (Bishofia) Pine) Brassair actihöþhylla (Schefflera) Enerolobium cycocarpum (Ear tree) Eucalyptus spp. (Eucalyptus) Ficus spp. (Non-Native Ficus) Grevilla robusta (Silk Oak) Sapium sebifrum(Chin~se Tallow Tree) Underline is for addition Gtrike Thl\"ll:l\7l'" is for deletion Page 3 PRINT DATE: 01/02102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ~ ...,., Syzgium cumini (Java Plum) Melia azedarach (Chinaberry) Syaygium jambos (rose apple) Cinnamomum camphora (Champhor Tree) Liqustrum sinense (Chinese Privet) Eugenia uniflora (surinam Cherry) Scaevola sericea, s. taccada. Psidium sup. (Guava) S. frutescens (Scaevola) Peltophorum pterocarpum (yellow poinciana) and all non-native fruit trees such as orange and grapefruit trees. **********.***************** PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicab'eonlytÖ¡!..Ini~9orpor~t7d areas of S1. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof¡in.conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of sucrni'eonfli61. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any porti()nofthis ordinél!lC7'i~f~r any reaS~ni~jlâøl'declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, suçhf;!ºlging shalln()télff~ct the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any proviSiol'ltm~reofsrnall béh~ldtóþeinapplicableto any person, property, orcircumstance, such holding srnallnotçlffect its appliCÇ\þiUtyto any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable in the unincorporated area of S1. Lucie County. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be andishereby directed forthwitrn to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of AdministratiVë Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 3230 Underline is for addition OtrillG nllo~gl , is for deletion Ordinance #02-001 a Draft #1 Page 4 PRINT DATE: 01/02/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 '-" -' PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XX Vice Chairman Cliff Barnes XX Commissioner Paula Lewis XX PART H. Commissioner John D. Bruhn XX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XX CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall bEHl"lcorporatecfin the St,Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws, and the word "ordinance" may bedhanged to "section" , "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of thi~ ordinance m~¥betenumbe~~~'~tirelettel'éd to accomplish such intention; provided, however, thª~!parts B througþ/t-lshall notbecôdified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman Underline is for addition Glrike Throtlgh is for deletion Ordinance #02-001 a Draft #1 Page 5 PRINT DATE: 01/02102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 tî DJM 01-001a(Lndcod01 -H) Ordinance #02-00' a Draft #1 '-" ...,., APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney Underline is for addition Gtrille Through is for deletion Page 6 PRINT DATE: 01102102 1 Ordinance #02-OO1a Draft #1 '-' Underline is for addition Gtrike Throl:lgl'l is for deletion ...,., Page 7 PRINT DATE: 01/02/02 r ":\?('¡ i":T~5f\~ .I'!l .'-' """"".'.,..;~ ;d~v~i~ - ('; ;c" ;.". ".¡ 1"1'1 ",>;-'.~';)~.~.':j - ø u ~>; ;'ì:'j~;;¡r\!7·f\ ~ ZnN :,;':.;,:,;';~í,'·;? "ll .U ING AGENDA ITEM 5: ORDINANCE 02-001 - Amendinl! Section 7.09.00. Landscapiri'ä"â¡Si!i!JfA.~PROVAL Mr. Dennis Murphy, Assistant Community Development Director, stated that Agenda Item # 5 was to consider Draft Ordinance 02-001 amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 7.09.03(e)(2)(f) Landscaping and Screening, to add Cattley Guava, Common Guava, Loquat, Surinam Cherry and Rose Apple to the list of trees and plants that shall not be planted in St. Lucie County. The County has been requested by the Indian River Citrus League to add these listed plants to the portion of the County's Land Development Code that addresses exotic or pest type of trees and plants. The reason cited for this request is the fact the listed trees are considered to be host plants for the Caribbean Fruit Fly. which poses a significant threat to the local areas citrus crops. He continued that Indian River County, to the north, has enacted a similar restriction and that Martin County has also been approached regarding the same issue. Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission I Local Planning Agency forward to the Board of County Commissioners a recommendation that Draft Ordinance 02-001, propose to amend Section 7.09.03(e)(2)(t) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Landscaping and Screening, to add Cattley Guava, Common Guava, Loquat. Surinam Cheny and Rose Apple to the list of trees and plants that shall not be planted in St. Lucie County, be approved. Mr. Merritt questioned who determined that Guava is exotic. Mr. Murphy explained that the list of plants provided were considered to be host plants for pests that pose a threat to the local citrus crops. Mr. Murphy explained that these are not necessarily "exotic" but they don't have another category to place them in to restrict them. Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing. Seeing no one, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lounds stated that he feels there is some validity to the request because of the threat posed by the Caribbean Fruit Fly but he stated that groves are already governed by rules to certify them as being "fly free". He continued that there are already restrictions on most of these plants/trees on how far they can be from a grove. He also stated that there are others in the County that are not within a certain radius of a grove and therefore not affected by these rules and should have the right to grow these items if they choose. Some of the plants in the original section are exotics and have a tendency to overrun planted areas, such as Australian Pine and Brazilian Pepper. He continued that he doesn't feel that the Guava's should be compared to these types of items and that this item is being motivated by one particular organization and they have other existing options available to assist them. He stated that there are plenty of other ways for the groves to be certified fly free and it is not for all citrus, only for the fresh fruit business being exported to I apan. Mr. Merritt questioned if anyone knows what the distance requirement is for a guava tree to a grove. At this point, several members of the audience wished to speak. Chairman Matthes reopened the Public Hearing. Mr. Ray Chandler stated he works in the citrus industry and says that the distance requirements vary depending on the season. He continued that Guava is a major problem with the Caribbean Fruit Fly and it costs groves a great expense to trap them so that they can be certified as fly free. He also stated that the citrus industry is hurting. but they do a lot of exporting to Japan. A lot of the money made here in St. Lucie County comes from the groves and the packing facilities in the area. The more money that they have to spend on preparation for export means less revenue to spend in St. Lucie County. Chairman P & Z Meeting January 17,2002 Page 9 \..- -rwI r I '-... Matthes asked Mr. Chandler if he understands that this ordinance will prohibit everÝõ~e in St. Lucie County from planting these items, not just those within regulated areas from groves. Mr. Chandler stated that being in the citrus business he feels that it would be better if no one planted them. Mr. Jones asked Mr. Chandler if he felt the primary problem with Guavas was from native or ones that individual people have planted. Mr. Chandler stated that both of them are problems. Mr. Lounds asked Mr. Chandler when the fly free time was. Mr. Chandler stated that it starts when they begin shipping into Japan and continues until all packing is finished. Mr. Lounds asked when Guavas bloom and Mr. Chandler stated he was not sure. Mr. Lounds continued that when Guavas are in bloom there are no grapefruit and the fruit is the host of the tree. He stated that there is a trapping program in Florida and there are no Mediterranean or Caribbean Fruit Flies in Florida. Mr. Chandler stated that he feels that is incorrect because they have been trapping Mediterranean Flies over the years. He continued that flies have the ability to fly a long distance and could pose a great risk. Mr. Merritt questioned the existing program used by the citrus industry to eliminate the problem. Mr. Chandler stated that there is a program supplied by the County but most grove owners take care of it themselves. Mr. Lounds stated that there is the need for the citrus industry to be able to expand their marketplace but doesn't feel that anyone who may have these trees/plants outside of a three mile radius of a grove would be a threat. Mr. Trias questioned if this ordinance would apply to the city and Chainnan Matthes stated he did not believe so. :.'" , ,"1 \,; .~...~ Mr. Jim Andrews, Vero Beach Citrus stated that he has been in the citrus industry for 22 years. He continued that he feels the flies are a major problem to their business. He also said that for four months during the summer they spend approximately seven to ten hours a day locating host plants. Seeing no one else, Chairman Matthes closed the Pub6c Hearing. Mr. Lounds asked if the ordinance would require Countywide removal of these trees/plants as well as no new ones being planted. Mr. Murphy explained that this ordinance would only apply from the approval date forward. He continued that the County does not have a program to go out and eradicate existing exotics. Mr. McCurdy moved to recommend approval of Ordinance 02-001. Motion seconded by Mr. Hearn. Mr. Lounds asked Staff if this ordinance would have to have a decision tonight. Mr. Murphy explained he is not aware of any time restraints. Mr. Lounds asked if a continuation for further discussion could be done. Ms. Young stated that it would to go the Board with their vote but no recommendation. Mr. Merritt stated that he felt if this ordinance were apply to specific zoning districts instead of to the entire County it would have received more support. Upon a roll call vote the motion received a vote of 4-4 (with Mr. Jones, Mr. Merritt, Mr. Lounds and Mr. Matthes voting against) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners. P & Z Meeting January 17,2002 Page 10 " ..",..,..... """ ~ Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5E 02/05/02 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] Quasi-JD [ X ] To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 02-031 granting a Change in Zoning from the IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning Districts to the U (Utilities) Zoning District for property located on the west side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. BACKGROUND: CPV CANA, Ltd., has requested a change in zoning for 61.54 acres of land located on the west side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. The stated purpose for the rezoning is to allow the construction and operation of a gas-fired, 250- megawatt electric generation plant in the U (Utilities) Zoning District as a conditional use, subject to Board of County Commissioners approval. (File No: RZ-01-015) FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: At the December 20, 2001, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 2 (Mr. Grande and Mr. Hearn), with one member (Mr. Akins) absent, recommended approval for the requested change in zoning. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-031. - CONCURRENCE: 0~L Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: D APPROVED 0 DENIED W OTHER Continue for Board discussion only until 2/19 6PM. County Attorney Originating Dept: Finance: Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: .'-" ...., Commission Review: February 5, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Assistant Community Development Director DATE: January 30,2002 SUBJECT: Application of CPV CANA, Ltd. for a Change in Zoning from the IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning Districts to the U (Utilities) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-01-015) LOCATION: West side of Range Line Road. approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. EXISITNG ZONING: IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) PROPOSED ZONING: LAND USE DESIGNATION: U (Utilities) INO (Industrial) PARCEL SIZE: 61.54 acres PROPOSED USE: Electric generating plant is a gas-fired, 250-megawatt facility. The plant will utilize a combined cycle generating unit to produce up to 175 megawatts of electrical power from its gas turbines and up to 75 megawatts of electrical power from its steam generator recovery system. The primary fuel used by the turbines will be natural gas, with the capability of using sulfur (0.05%) NO.2 distillate fuel oil as a back-up fuel. PERMITIED USES: Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(W) U (Utilities) - contains the designated uses which are permitted by right, permitted as an accessory use, or permitted through the conditional use process. Any use deSignated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approvals. Any use not found within the zoning district regulations are designated as prohibited uses for that district SURROUNDING ZONING: IH and U to the north, south, and northwest. AG-5 (Agricultural- 1 du/5 acres) to the east and north. '-" ""'" January 30, 2002 Page 2 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: RZ-01-015/CU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is industrial, pasture land, and citrus groves. The property abuts the Florida East Coast Railway line and FP&L easement, which has 230 KV and 500 KV electrical transmission lines crossing over it to the immediate west. Florida Tire Recycling and Chem-Tec are two of the industrial uses located to the north. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is IND and AG-5 (Agricultural - 5). FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #14 (St. Lucie West Boulevard), is located approximately 7.5 miles to the northeast. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is served by an on-site well and septic system. The plant operations will be cooled by water from the Floridan Aquifer. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-Of-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Range Line Road is 100 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE Of CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. ************************************************ STANDARDS Of REVIEW AS SET fORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The U Zoning District is compatible with the IND Future Land Use and allows electric generation plants as a conditional use, subject to Board of County Commission approval. '-' ..,J January 30, 2002 Page 3 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: RZ-01-015/CU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The IND Land Use is compatible with the U Zoning District and a portion of the subject property is already zoned Utilities. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is Inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general use of the immediate surrounding area of the subject property is industrial, citrus groves, and pasture land. Some residences are located along Glades Cut-Off Road and Carlton Road to the west across the FEC Railway Line. The property abuts the Florida East Coast Railway line and FP&L easement, which has 230 KV and 500 KV electrical transmission lines crossing over it to the immediate west. Florida Tire Recycling and Chem-Tec are two of the industrial uses located to the north. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment, however, the requested amendment is considered to be consistent with the existing land use designation of IND (Industrial) and the existing industrial uses in the area. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The subject property was previously cleared and has been utilized as pasture land. There are two freshwater, herbaceous wetlands that cross onto the subject property. The total acreage of these wetlands on the CPV CANA site is 0.08 and 0.2 acre respectively. These wetlands will be provided with a buffer and preserved in place. No impacts are expected. The majority of the site consists of Brazilian peppers and wax myrtle. Trees on-site consist of pine trees and cabbage palms. '-" .."J January 30, 2002 Page 4 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: RZ-01-015/CU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern for this area will continue with this change in zoning. The surrounding parcels of property are designated for industrial and some agricultural uses. The rezoning of the subject property to the U Zoning District would allow for a use that is consistent with these existing industrial uses. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS The petitioner, CPV CANA, LTD., has requested this change in zoning from the IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning Districts to the U (Utilities) Zoning District in order to develop an electrical generating plant on the subject property. If the requested change in zoning is approved, CPV Cana will also need to seek a conditional use permit to allow an electric generation plant in the Utilities Zoning District. The proposed zoning district designation is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general use of the immediate surrounding area of the subject property is industrial, citrus groves, and pasture land. Some residences are located along Glades Cut-Off Road and Carlton Road to the west across the FEC Railway Line. The property abuts the Florida East Coast Railway line and FP&L easement, which has 230 KV and 500 KV electrical transmission lines crossing over it to the immediate west. Florida Tire Recycling and Chem-Tec are two of the industrial uses located to the north. A dairy feed company is located to the south. Three miles to the south of the proposed project is the Treasure Coast Air Park, a private flying community. The proposed use of the subject property as an electric generating plant is conslstent with the uses already existing in the area. The proposed plant is not inconsistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan because the subject property has a future land use classification of IND (Industrial), which allows for the Utilities Zoning District, as well as, the Heavy Industrial and Light Industrial Zoning Districts, which allow for uses that are more intense than the proposed power plant. Attached is a copy of Section 3.01.03(W) - U (Utilities), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, which delineates the permitted, accessory, and conditional uses allowed in the Utilities Zoning District. If the change in zoning request is approved, the applicant, by right, would be allowed to establish any of the uses under the Permitted Uses section. Any use under the ~ .I January 30, 2002 Page 5 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: RZ-01-015/CU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 Accessory Uses section would be allowed only if one or more of the permitted uses exist on the subject property. Any use under the Conditional Uses section could only be allowed if it first receives approval through the Board of County Commissioners. At the December 20, 2001, meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 2 (Mr. Hearn and Mr. Grande), with one member (Mr. Akins) absent, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the change in zoning. Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that the Board approve the petition for a change in zoning from the IH (Industrial, heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning District to the U (Utilities) Zoning District. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 02-031, which, if approved, would grant a change in zoning from the IH (Industrial, heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning District to the U (Utilities) Zoning District. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED: Dennis J. Murphy, AICP Assistant Community Development Director hf cc: Scott Glaubitz Peter Podurgiel County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Planning Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 '--' .,J RESOLUTION 02-031 FILE NO.: RZ-01-015/CU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE U (UTILITIES) AND IH (INDUSTRIAL, HEAVY) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE U (UTILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence presented, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. CPV CANA Ltd.. presented a petition for a change in zoning from the U (Utilities) and IH (Industrial, Heavy) Zoning Districts to the U (Utilities) Zoning District for the property described below. 2. On December 20, 2001, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve a change in zoning from the U (Utilities) and IH (Industrial, Heavy) Zoning Districts to the U (Utilities) Zoning District for the property described in Part A below. 3. On February 5, 2002, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed change in zoning has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of property in the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The proposed change in the Zoning District Classification from the U (Utilities) and IH (Industrial, Heavy) Zoning Districts to the U (Utilities) Zoning District for that property described as follows: PARCEL 1: - COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUNS SOUTH 00·00'54" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 2,897.98 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00·00'54" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 362.83 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89·59'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 660 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00·00'54" WEST, File No.: RZ-01-015 February 5. 2002 Resolution 02-031 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ~ .." A DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°59'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,976.38 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 44°46'00" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EASEMENT, A DISTANCE OF 1,869.78 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°00'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 635.03 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°59'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,320.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALL LYING AND BEING IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND CONTAINING 36.06 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 2: A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 1, THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°00'54 WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 2,897.98 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°59'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,320.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°00'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 635.03 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 660 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT, AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 333, AT PAGE 248, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00°00'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 937.46 FEET, TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 150 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THEN RUN SOUTH 44°46'00" WEST, ALONG SAID RIGHT-oF·WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 653.38 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°00'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 653.38 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 44°46'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,216.39 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°00'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 284.08 FEET, TO THE SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 660 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE RUN NORTH 44°46'00" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1,869.78 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 15.4846 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 3: A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NE CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°00'54" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 2,567.98 FEET, TO A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 00°00'54" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH 89°59'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,320 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH 00°00'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89°59'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,320 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING AND BEING IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND CONTAINING 10.00 ACRES MORE OR LESS. File No.: RZ-01-Q15 February 5.2002 Resolution 02-031 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 "" ....tI West side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road.) owned by CPV CANA, Ltd., is hereby approved. (Location: B. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner John D. Bruhn PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 5th Day of February 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\WPIRESOLUTIONIFINISHED.02ICPV.RZ\CPV _RZ-RES.wpd File No.: RZ-01-015 February 5.2002 Resolution 02-031 Page 3 .., ... ... ~ '" z ::> 0 ~ ü .... ..... ::> 0 OYClØ :»11 l!IH'. Ü a: ill I > « 1IlQ.,., æ ~ .., ! z .., 1Il ;; ¡ ~ I 1Il ~ II: .... G31NS Z '" ::¡: « Ci .... -. ~ .r- ,-,. ( f .; 1\".. Z o ~ eel c eel o > (L o é~ 'Oør . T 1 ~~f : '~¡aj ~ ~ ; ~ 2 L.() ...-- o I ...-- o N 0: " (. Il \ (. , ~ ~ i S K 1 S " 1 '\ .. AlNn08 3380H833>tO ~ w ... ... '" A P.etition of CP\. ;ana, r:>'::f). for a Change in Zoning from C'...' (IndustrJeavy) and U , (Utilities) to U (l.Wies). \.. ; ~ \ ì ; ( í , i ; , , \j OJ o to I U1 0:: U1 l:J a o 0:: Q) .~ ....J RZ 01-015 ~h~~~~ Map prepared November 7, 2001 f r/ZdThiS. pattern indicates subject parcel ThII mIp hlII bMn~ klr~plIrri'1g tnd ~ ~ cnr. ~....,.rbI... bMn ma 10 PRMdI ....1flOItamnl.tI"Id ICCU'III HomIllllcwIpoeeIlle.l.not~bu._.~bInllß; ~ N , Zoning '-" ( CPV Cana, LTD. ( ...., (\ \ ; r' í , ¡ ; , , '.I AG-5 u Cl::: (J) "0 0 0 Cl::: Q) AG-5 c :.J IH r-) / / IH RZ 01-015 5Th~~~ f G!~, ~<=.>.."";::'" Map prepared November 7. 2001 1NI1NP'" bien ~ IClrQlnllll~ 1I'd....... ~ ot'Ii N 'MIll ...,.no.t"- œ.n .,.. .. ~ .. moc(UlW'll rcl &'O:UIMI lrIorrNIlon pclIUÖI.lllflCIClrårIded tcr_.. ~bh:i'v docYTwt. WZ¿:j/ThiS. pattern indicates subject parcel . Land Use ~ (" CPV Cana, LTD. (' ..., ; c '\ \ ; ( ( I ¡ ; . , '.I AG-5 OJ 0 to , (/) a::: (/) "0 0 0 a::: INO Q) .S ....J AG-5 ,--) / / INO RZ 01-015 5lr.4~..~~ f <¡.~ ~.;;>" Map prepared November 7, 2001 m. n-.p.... t..l ~ foro--apllrri'v n2""'" pI. pQMI otWy. N WhIt ~tfIorIMI"'" "-"to ØRMdII hmcllllCUTll'll.-w:f IIl:ICl.nle ~~It..nat~Ior'*..!.gIIyblndngOac:umlrl. ~Z~ThiS. pattern indicates subject parcel \.. c CPV Cana, LTD. ( .." RZ 01-015 ~.;Ç~~.~ Map prepared November 7. 2001 nil mIfl ... '-' 00IT¡Ñd lor ~"pIIIYq aid ~ ~ ~ N Wh-..-yIll'lortMl belnmldllO~" 1TlClII~arK:l ~ ~~.."ml~b__.~t*dIlgcloc:lmerW. W' Z~ThiS. pattern indicates subject parcel .I' /- \ ( w. 1 . Purpose ~ c ...." l Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations 1L UTILITIES The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for utilities. transportation, and communication facilities, together with such other uses as may be compatible with utility, transportation, and communication facility surroundings. The number in "O"following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(8). The number 999 applies 10 a use nol defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. ( ( I. m. n. Air transportation services (451.452) Agriculture, including farms, groves, and ranches. (01.02) Communication. (48) Electric services (491) Electric transmission rights-of-way. (4911 Gas pipeline rights-of-way. (492) Gas production and distribution (4921 Industrial wastewater disposal. (999) Railroad, rapid rail transit, & street railway transportation. (40,41) Sanitary services (495) Transportation services (47) Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) Water supply and irrigation systems. (494.497) Water transportation (44) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance wilh Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-streel parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Seclion 7.09.00. ~ 7. Conditional Uses a. Airports. (458) b. Electric generation plants. (491) c. Gas production plants. (492) d. Land clearing and yard trash recycling operations - subject to the provisions of Section Adopted August 1. 1990 130 Revised Through 08101/00 "" ( ( -...I Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations e f. g. h. 7.10.12. (999) Natural or manufactured gas storage and distribution points. (492) Protective functions and their related activities - Correctional institutions (9223) Solid waste disposal. (4953) Outdoor shooting ranges, providing site plan approval is obtained according 10 the provisions of Sections 11.02.07 through 11.02.09 and Section 7.10.19 of this Code. (999) ( I ( 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00 and include Ihe following: a. Automobile and truck rental services. b. Restaurants. (Including the sale of alcoholic beverages for on premises consumption only.) (999) ( " Adopted August 1.1990 131 Revised Through 08101/00 U. 1. Purpose '-' ....J ( ( Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations !!:L ( INDUSTRIAL. HEAVY The purpose of this district is to provide an environment suitable for heavy manufacturing and other activities that may impose undesirable noise, vibration, odor, dust, or other offensive effects on the surrounding area together with such other non-residential uses as may be necessary to and compatible with heavy industrial surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Seclion 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses Any use permitted in the Industrial Light (IL) zoning district: a. b. Agricultural services (01) Construction services: (1) Building construction - general contractor (15) (2) Other construction - general contractors {lS1 (3) Construction - special trade contractors (17) Docks and boathouses (private). (999 Engineering services (8711 Manufacturing: (1 ) Food & kindred products (20) (2) Tobacco products (21 (3) Textile mill products (22) (4) Apparel and other finished products (23) (5) Lumber and wood products, except furniture (24) (6) Furniture and fixtures {251 (7) Printing and publishing and allied industries (27) (8) Chemicals & allied products: (a) Drugs (21131 (b) Soap, detergents and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics and other toilet preparations (2841 (c) Agricultural chemicals (287) (9) Rubber & misc. plastic products (30) (10) Leather & leather products (311 (11) Glass (a) Flal glass (321) (b) Glass & glassware - pressed or blown (322) (c) Glass products - made of purchased glass (323) (12) Fabricated melal products (except ammunition and ordnance) (34) (13) Industrial/commercial machinery & computer equipment. (35) (14) Electronic & other electrical "equipment and components, except computer. equipment. (36) (15) Transportation equipment (31) (16) Measuring, analyzing and controlling instruments (JIll (17) Misc. manufacturing industries: (a) Jewelry, silverware, and platedware. (3911 (b) Musical instruments and parts. (393) ( c. d. e. Adopted August 1. 1990 125 Revised Through 08101/00 ~ ( ( ...., Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations (1) Paper and paper products. (511) (2) Drugs (512) (3) Dry goods and apparel. (Sf3) (4) Groceries and related products. (5l4) (5) Farm producls - raw materials. (515) (6) Chemicals, and allied products. (516) (7) Beer, wine, and distilled alcoholic beverages. (518) (8) Misc. Nondurable Goods: (a) Farm supplies (5191) (b) Books, periodicals, & newspapers (5192) (c) Flowers, nursery stock & florists' supplies (5193) (d) Tobacco/tobacco products (5194) (e) Paints, varnishes & supplies (5198) (f) Nondurable goods, NEC (5199) Mobile food vendors (999) ( i ( t. 3. Lol Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Offstreet Parking and Loading Requirements ( Offstreet parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses a. Airport, landing and takeoff fields - general aviation. (4581) b. Manufacturing: (1) Paper & allied products (26) (2) Chemicals & allied products (28) (3) Petroleum refining & related products (29) (4) Stone, clay, glass & concrete products (32) (5) Primary metal industries (33) (6) Ammunition & ordinance (348) c. Natural or manufactured gas storage and distribution points. (492) d. Scrap, waste and land clearing and yard~rash recycling operations - subject to the provisions of Section 7.10.12. e Warehousing and storage services - stockyards. (999) f. Wholesale trade - nondurable goods: (1) Petroleum & petroleum products (999) Adopted August 1, 1990 127 Revised Through 08/01/00 "'" ( ( .....,,¡ Section 3.01.03 Zoning Districl Use Regulations /" " " ( 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Co-generation facilities. (999) b. Fueling facilities. (999) c. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999) d. One detached single-family dwelling or mobile home, for on-site security purposes per property. (999) e. Retail: (1) Bottled gas. (999) (2) Fuel oil. (999) (3) Gasoline service stations. (999) (4) Retail trade accessory to the primary manufacturing or wholesaling use. (999) .. Adopted AuguSl1, 1990 128 Revised Through 08/01100 .> '-" ~ .- . .....,. . .. ~.. ;1 .....-..:aa . .,;;.;.;J. AGENDA ITEM 2: CPV CANA, LTD. - File No. RZ-OI-015 . .¡ Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda hems #2 & #3 reference two separate petitions filed by CPV CANA, Ltd. These items were presented at lhe same time, however each item requires that they be opelled separately and voted 011 separately. CPV CANA. Ltd. has lìIed petiltOIlS for a change ill zollillg from ¡he IH (fnduslrial. Heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning Districts to the U (litililies) ZOlllng District and also for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 250 megawatt. gas powered, electric gencration plant for the property located on thc west side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. The general existing use surrounding the property is industrial; pasture land, and citrus groves. Thc applicant is seeking permission to construct a combined cycle electrical generating facility consisting of a combustion turbine providing approximately 175 megawatts of electrical power with a heat recovery steam generator providing a maximum of 75 megawatts of electrical power. The primary source of fuel for the proposed plant is natural gas. The applicant is proposing that sulfur fuel oil be used as a back-up fuel for up to 30 days, at full load, per year. Staff has reviewed these petitions and determined that they conform to the standards of review as set forth in the Land Development Code and are not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward these petitions to the Board of County Commissioners with recommendations of approval with the Conditional Use Permit subject to the three (3) linúting conditions. Chainnan Matthes if there were any questions of Staff from the Commission. Seeing none, Chainnan Matthes asked if the petitioner or representative was present. Mr. Richard V. Neill, Jr., attorney with Neill, Griffin, Jeffries, Fowler, Tierney and Neill in Fort Pierce and have been practicing law in Fort Pierce for 18 years came forward to represent the applicant. The project before the Commission tonight is a 250 megawatt, combined site power plant. The location is on Range Line Road, heading South of Glades Cut-Off. The basic applications that are before the Commission are for a rezoning. The property is currently zoned Utilities and Heavy mdustrial and we are asking that the entire property be rezoned to Utilities only. The second aspect is the Conditional Use Permit because in order to construct a power generating facility in Utilities zoning, we have to have a conditional use permit. The final aspect is the site-plan approval. As reflected in the staff report and as reflected by our finn's review of the matter, this is an application that meets all the legal requirements and standards. He introduced the applicant, CPV CANA, Ltd., a fully owned subsidiary of Competitive Power Ventures, mc., which is a dynanùc young. company developing power plants in both the State of Florida and also outside of the state. He continued that CPV has a power project presently under construction in the LTC Ranch mdustrial Park located in Port St. Lucie. CPV has proY~n experience in developing electrical generating facilities. The plant has made a contribution·'to. the infrastructure of the community and the tax base as well. He also gave out copi!::s--Qfa letter from the City of Port St. Lucie to the Commission and pointed out that the last paragraph shows that they support the project and believe it will be an addition to the c.ommunity. He also pointed out that Mr. Cooper also stated in the letter that CPV and Pèter Podi.irgiel have proven to be very credible, responsive to their requests and have honored their comnútments to the City of Port St. Lucie in a timely manner. Mr. Peter Podurgiel. Vice President of Development for Competitive Power Ventures, lnc. stated P & Z Meeting December 20, 2001 Page 4 \r ( , _-:. ~:~ ~,1 ~ oft ¡ .r~, ;~." ....... . ~ '. .<'~..' n.""" ,. -' ".,' ,..-,', ,'.' '" .:;.. ' I c; :.. l.~ .,,-~'-' .. j :;S..d:t ~.;:-:'.:':DT~J r- ~ . ,:.", - '''~~ ~.{ ~:_~ G ~·Hr:S : '. "'.-' ,", -,": _:..~ ¡,-,:.··;:-;~~:-;.~·,1.~U that he is also project manager for CPV CANA, Ltd. He stated that he recognizes'tHatthérè'have'''·¡ .,~ ¡; :,,- been other power projects before the Commission and he will be brief in his presentation. Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Rog Kermany stated he lives four miles south of the project and is an Airpark resident. He continued that he is opposed to this petition because most of them have hangers and airplanes and he feels that adequate notice was not given and it is not needed since there are two other plants within 15-20 miles of this proposed site. He questioned if there WaS a real need for another plant and said it would be an eyesore because he has to pass it everyday on his way to work. He also said he feels it could create a flight hazard with planes flying at their lowest elevation for landing. He stated that his biggest concern would be the affect on Aero Acres and Treasure Coast Air Park. Mr. McCurdy asked the petitioner to show the directions of the runway and Me Kermany explained that the runways ran east and west. Mr. William Barga advised he was from Treasure Coast Air Park and lives 3.5 miles from the site. He stated he was worried about their property values decreasing and the emissions from the stacks. Mr. Tom Beck stated he is also from Treasure Coast Air Park and also lives within 3.5 miles of the site. He advised that his concerns are what the impact will be on the environment from the fallout of smoke emissions, what the quality of their water will be, the air quality and pollution levels and also his property values. He also questioned the flight hazards and marking any existing obstructions. If homeland security proposes a no fly zone, why put a plant this close? Ms. Concis Nerbert questioned what impact there will be on her neighborhood with the new lines, residue from the stacks, fuel oil and truck I railroad impact from crossing. She asked who makes the decisions on building a plant, the location, the size and who owns the property. Mr. Robert Rengald, Treasure Coast Airport stated that he objects to this petition because of its vicinity to residential areas because there are at least a hundred lots within 3.5 miles of the proposed site. He also questioned the emissions and air pollution, flight restrictions by the FAA. He stated he would like to have more infonnation about the environmental impacts and the affect of the competing water uses with the Air Park. Me Tony Taggert, also an Air Park resident, stated he too had the same objections as the previous speakers. He asked how the neighbors to the north of the plant would be affected. He questioned if there was any real need for another plant in the area and how the pollution, dirt, noise and smells will affect them.'" ...#-..-~ .~.. Me Andy Basper, Aere Acres Air Park stated that his questiòns were regarding the pollution, debris fallout, power tower and distribution line and the fact that it ~ilI be directly in prevailing winds. .... Chairman Matthes requested that the secretary read into the records two letters that were received by the Board. P & Z Meeting Deccmber 20, 2001 Page 5 ..;.~:] :'F2 ~ ~r~L ~~~ SU[l]ECT ra PLrJHTNS & Zm-l!NG Cr)~l~~~!'''i-··:.': ~~:t~ ~.;,~ l1l~PRDV A L Ms. Snay read in a letter from Mr. Vincent Brocklebank, 15342 Sky King Drive, <-Ft"Pïerêe' Florida and the other from Mr. James Zboril, Core Communities, 1850 Fountainview Boulevard, Port Sl. r ,ucie. Plorida. "" Mr. I'odurgiel stated thalthe FAA has determined that there is no hazard to navigational airspace and presented a letter to be entered into record. Mr. John Moyle, Moyle and Flannigan, read a letter from Core Communities regarding their comments in response to letters they received from residents of the surrounding airparks. He stated that proper notice was given and proper advertisement was done. This petition meets all county ordinances regarding noise and environment, is consistent with surrounding industries operating on site and the project is below national levels of ambience for clean air. He also stated that they would not be constructing any new power lines, they would utilize existing lines and that the industrial zoning and use of property has been in place for at least 15 years. He advised that the airpark came after that zoning designation was in place and therefore they were aware of the industrial park. He finished by stating that he would be happy to meet with Core Communities and citizens to discuss the project in detail. Mr. Grande asked if there was a time problem with the processing of this application. He wanted the applicant to meet with the surrounding property owners at the Treasure Coast Airpark and with the Core Communities Group prior to the Commission making a recommendation to the Board of County Comuússioners. Then after the developers meet with the surrounding property owners and residents to then bring the petition back before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Podurgiel stated that they would be happy to meet with the residents of the Treasure Coast Airpark and Core Communities regarding to discuss their concerns and issues but they would prefer to continue the process as there are some time commitments that have to be met Mr. Kennanga stated that the FAA is not concerned with flight paths; they are only interested in what happens within the large airports. He continued to say that the FAA probably did not consider the Airport when they made their decision and that they were aware of the industrial use, but did not expect anything with such high pollution. Mr. Jones addressed the tower marking and lighting that is not required per the letter from the FAA and advised that could be a voluntary gesture. Mr. Merritt asked the petitioner to clarify the height of the stacks in relation to lines. Mr. Podurgiel stated that the tallest line is 130 feet and the structure is 40-50 feet above that stack. Mr. Lounds asked if that is the height of the pole or if included the additional 20-30 feet of static lines. Mr. Podurgiel stated that is the height of the structure, not the stand in between. ..' '.'r'· Scott Glaubitz explained that the higher of taller two lines is 115 feet above rntl\mil grade elevation and the highest portion of the plant is 1 LO feet at natural grade and has a 50-60 foot height differential. Mr. Lounds questioned that if there would be 3.5 million gallons of water per day, what would the depth be. Mr. Podurgiel advised it would be 1300 feet deep. Mr. Lounds asked what the salinity levels are at that depth. Mr. Neal Collins. representing the applicant, stated the water would be brackish and advised that the levels at that depth were too high for agricultural use. P & Z Meeting December 20, 2001 Page 6 r r I ¿ i>h~~-: ~ø~ '" "i'";'¡~Y~i~fì k~W~~Al The deep water well would be cased through the upper area at a depth of 1150 feet and an open hole another 50 feet down. He continued that the bolder zone (contained zone) is a confined area of 3.000 feet. Mr. Lounds asked if it was encased from top to bottom. Mr. Collins explained that it is and there is no potential for escape. Mr. Lounds asked if the retention ponds would be located behind {he west oj the Florida Tire Recycling Facility. Mr. Podurgiel stated it was south of it. Mr. Lounds asked what the noise levels at 70 decibels would sound like. Mr. Eric Hood advised the sound in room is approximately 60-75 decibels. Mr. Lounds stated that theoretically the power plant would rise to 100 decibels and you could not hear from road. Mr. Hood explained that you would be able to hear from property lines and there lowest usage for the County would be at night. He also advised that residents are much further away from the facility. Chairman Matthes asked how they could determine that residents that are 0.60 miles away would not be able to hear it. Mr. Hood advised that there was no way to prove that they will not be able to hear the sound produced by the plant. He did state that the closest residence may be able to hear it if they concentrate and there is no traffic. Mr. Lounds asked how this plant compares to other similar plants in the area. Mr. Podurgiel advised that on a pollution basis. they are the cleanest. Mr. Lounds asked Mr. Podurgiel to compare their proposed facility to the Ft Pierce Plant and any other facility that is of the same caliber as is being proposed before the Board. Mr. Podurgiel stated that it is tough to find a comparison based on appearance when compared to the one being proposed. The closest he could find would be the Pope County facility. Mr. Mike Anderson showed some graphics explaining the combustion of the facility. The nitrogen oxide I sulfur dioxide levels were depicted on the graph. He also explained that CPV's proposed facility emission rates are reduced because of the production basis of pounds per gallons of water. He also stated that the CPV facility is unnoticeable in comparison with three other existing plants. Chairman Matthes asked how this would relate to everyday life in the area. Mr. Anderson advised that it poses no threat to the public welfare. Mr. Rengald stated that the graphs do not show how much the pounds/polluted air compares to anything else in the area. He also questioned what is being produced and what kind of health risks this could pose. Chairman Matthes asked what other type of facility could be put there without going through a zoning change. Mr. Kelly responded that any permitted use in the Industrial Heavy Zon.~{lg District would be placed on the site. Accessory uses and conditional uses were also possible. .,".'.... ",~.......- Mr. Grande asked Staff how many power plant presentations the Board had recently heard. Staff responded two presentations had been heard. He stated that each 0l1:e offered something unique and each is the best. He asked Staff if they have condUced a"šlirvey to determine the best location for the orderly implementation of these types of uses, Le., power plants. instead of each one. He stated he is thinking about cumulative impact scattered around and if we have looked at the total impact of the industry with regards to air emissions and pollution as well as the effect that these facilities will have on the ground water. Mr. Kelly stated that we have not pre-located P & Z Meeting December 20, 2001 Page 7 ~,~r~~TF~~~[\~ .~ ~ ....,;"..J.~J_,l ~l tvJ.- .¡....u :ju:~~-r.C:::T TO F~..~\~·-d··:::);';~: f~ Z;JinNG areas for power plants and do not regulate the placement of these types of facilitiè.G,vlthin:th8 ¡~;-';:f:¡JV¡1l County. He also stated that there are no cumulative impacts and applicants have to complete a cumulative impact analysis during the state permitting process. Mr. Kelly sUlllmarized the questions that had been raised by the public during the public hearing. . Was the petition for the power plant properly noticed and advertised? . Will the power plant facility utilize the existing power lines or will they construct new lines? Where does the power go when it is generated, does it stay in the area or is sold to other areas? · What was previously planned for the proposed site? · What type of facility is being proposed? What type of fuel will the plant utilize? · What type of air emissions will be released from the facility? · Will the facility affect the ground water that is currently being utilized by the Air Park? How will the well source and depth plus disposal of water be handled? · Will the noise level from the plant effect any resident in the area? At what distance will the surrounding properties be able to hear the power plant? · How will this facility affect the existing flight patterns for the Air Park? Will this be a flight hazard? · Is there really a need for an additional power plant in St. Lucie County, especially in this area ? · What visual impact will occur from the construction of this power plant? Will it be landscaped along the roadways? · How will this power plant affect the property values in the area? · How high are the proposed stacks for this facility? Will the stack be lighted? · Will there be increased traffic on Glades Cut-Off RoadlRange Line Road from this facility, specifically truck and rail traffic? · If we have another terrorist attack and homeland security closes the area around power plants, will the residents of the Air Park be grounded due to a no-fly zone? Mr. Podurgiel attempted to address the list of questions and stated that no new power lines were being built; they are tying into existing lines. He also stated that the plant is 3-4 miles north of the runway at the airpark and there are lights on the tower and that is okay with the FAA. He continued that US Precast owns the property and a concrete processing plant is what was previously planned. He stated that this plant is tremendously efficient because it is a combinC'"~ cycle and most peaking plants burn gas, but don't use the excess heat and their plant does. Seeing no one else, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hearn stated that his concerns were the issues brought up by the public tonight and tho~ _. . . addressed in the letters. He also stated that the cumulative effects are his main.çoncern and questioned why we meet only the letter of the law for notice issue. He also qu~sti'¿Ìî~ how many plants are too many; at what point will the qualityof life be affected and how many power plants will this County be able to support. He stated he will be ."otiÌlg against the petition until the citizens and members of the Board can have more information. . Chairman Matthes asked what the recommendation of Staff was. Mr. Flores advised that Staff recommends approval of the rezoning and approval of the conditional use with the 3 conditions listed in the Staff report. P & Z Meeting December 20, 2001 Page 8 '-" ~.;è:';:'? ~~i[lt~= Si;:.':·T( T:] , C'...~.~.·..:r) ~ ..). p"', ;\"" _. , . .~~ -,:: -(,:.~~'fh'-hl :..........:;......-...... < ?::/,<:.~?J;~l Mr. Lounds stated that he understands Mr. Hearn's feelings. but continued that the further out the plants are built, the better off we are. Mr. Grande stated that he has 110 problem wilh the notification of those within 500 feet. but feels il would be a good idea to extend the alea to all those within 1,000 to 2.000 feel. espeCially with the density of the developments. Mr. Lounds stated that after considcring the tcstimony presented during thc ()ublic Hearing, including staff comments, and the Standards of Review as sct forth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Dcvclopmcnt Code, ( hereby move that thc Planning and Zoning Commission recommcnd that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to thc application of CPY CANA, Ltd., for a Changc in Zoning from the IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning Districts to the U (Utilities) Zoning District because the proposed zoning is compatible with the industrial uses in the area and the proposed power plant is not inconsistent with other uses, plus the proposed are is more beneficial to a power plant than being downtown due to the property being next to a power distribution line and safe sight poUution. Motion seconded by Mr. Jones. Upon a roU call vote the motion passed with a vote of 6-2 (with Mr. Grande and Mr. Hearn voting against) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval. ..' .- ~~.. .~. P & Z Meeting Dccember 20, 2001 Page 9 \..- p ~-. ~''7'~ 10"';" P\ ~ ts :~·j\~~::.r â~ ~~i]gtil--- {, : .' ~ ~ .. \- .'"'3. AGENDA ITEM 3: CPV CANA, LTD - File No. CU-OI-007 ~., ~ ·~":T:H~f~f!, ~'.< :\Ldu >. '":,::,;j ~~l Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments. stated that Agenda Items #2 & #3 reference two separate petitions filed by CPV CANA. Ltd. These items were presented at the same time. however each item required that they be opened separately and voted on separately. Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing. Seeing no one, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lounds asked if the tights were needed. Mr. Merritt stated that the lights must be on as a conditional use. Mr. Jones stated that for many years he lived near a tower with a blinking light, and the light really bothered him. Therefore, he doesn't feel that the light is necessary. Mr. Merritt stated that after considering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, including staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.07.03, S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the S1. Lucie County Board of County Conunissioners grant approval to the application of CPV CANA, Ltd., for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a 250 megawatt electrical generating plant in the U (Utilities) Zoning District because the proposed use is placed properly compared to other approved power plants in the industrial area and it is a clean neighbor. Motion seconded by Mr. Loumls. Upon a roll caD vote the motion passed with a vote of 6·2 (with Mr. Grande and Mr. Hearn voting against) and forwarded to the Board of County Comnñssioners with a recommendation for approval. 'I . ~ ~:-_lÞ P & Z Meeting December 20, 2001 Page 10 / 12/20/2001 rHlI 19:07 FAX 3403718 ST LlICIE WEST DEV COHt' ,.." .\..t ( ( Me DClUli3 Murphy Community Development Director ' St. Lucie Counl1 2300 Virginia AVCIÏue Fe Pierce, FL 34982-5652' Re: Cry CANA, Ltd. ("Applicant") Dcar Dc:ullis: VIA TELECOPlER TO 462-1735 Late today, We became aWllJ"C that tonight the ahove referenced applicant may be seeking approval of (i) change in zoning from the IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning Districl1l to the U (Utilities) Zoning District and (ii) à Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and operntion of a 250 megawatt. electrical genernting plant to be located on the Wet side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 miles south of Glades Cut-OtfRoad. As you know, Core Communities is the owner and developer of a planned mixed-use project called Westchester that will be a Z,033~acro project located approximately J.5 miles southeast of the Applicant's site. Our development plans call for significant residential housing with ¡¡ strong envil'Ollllrelltnltheme 'centered around nature trails. waterways and various pedestrian systems. We ace currently uncomfortable that the Applicant's proposed use is consistelltwi!h our community vision and We are unsure that the Applicant has adequalely addressed the health and safety issues that could affect our residents and/or the loealenvirollIDent. As result, we, feel that we must object to Ihe proposed .Zoning changes and Condití0n81 Use Permit, . Lastly, we have been workin~ closely with the Reserve Homes Ltd., L.P. (the owner of !he PGA Reserve localed Nonheast of the Applicant's site) and A. Duda & SODS, Inc. (the OWners of the onmge/grapefrnit groves directly southeast from the Applicant's site) on many regional issues concerning land use, roadwåys and environmental conservation. We are of the opinion that these property owners also sliare our viewpoints and will be .transmittÌIlg concerns and objections in the future. I would appreciate you reading this letter into the Public Record should this topic be'"'>. formlllly hean! before Ihe Planning and Zoning Commission Or the Board of County Commissioners. . Than.lc you for your cooperation. cc; Thomas Bàbcoek, A. Duda &; Sons, Inc. lohn Csapo, Re..~erve Homes Ltd., L.P. Pete Hegener, Core Communities ST. W(;1.8 WMT . WI!.'\T(' .{F.'¡,Tl;^ 1850 Fowl1ainview ßo..levlIfd· Suite 201 . Port St. Lucie' Florida 349k6 Phone: (561) 340,3500· Fu: (561) 340-3718' www.corecommunilin.com A wholly o.....d sIIbJldlory u/ Ro.Ullomi, flo.corp (/'IYSJ:; B¥) PSl:3590; I 19J002/002 I uec c::u u! ut: :~t: a t:CO-LuOe Corp. 561 "'~.. - :,nll 1 ( \ .., \..-- Thursday, December 20, 200 I via fax to (561) 462-2132 Mr. Stiefan Matthcrs, Chaimlan and the Sl. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 RE: FILE NUMBER CU-OI-007. Dear Mr. Matthers and The Planning and Zoning Commission: Please accept this as a substitution for my appearance in opposition to the planned electric power generation station reference the above file nwnber. Please make a verbatim record oftlùs and any further proceeding in this matter. Please read this letter in opposition into the record. By way of reference I am a property owner less than four miles from the planned site, at Treasure Coast Airpark. There are numerous issues to be considered that will negatively impact the local community surrounding this site. Including possible flight restrictions that could ground all flight operations at the airpark. Additionally, if what [ read in the newspapers is correct FPL has been selling power out of the state of Florida, which should indicate to this commission that there is no need for any additional power generation. FUrther issues are pollution, location and esthetics. I am of the opinion that the interests of the local homeowners should take precedence over a foreign corporation. Do the homeowners in Saint Lucie west know that with the prevailing winds in this are most of the pollution will be blown over their homes? Has an impact study been done? I also question the Common sense of giving the citizens of this county less than 10 days notice to respond to your notice of hearing during the busy holiday season. I found out about the hearing from a neighbor on Tuesday December 18, 2001 in the evening. ,~ Again, please record my opposition, thank you ladies and gentlemen of the board for considering my statements in your future decision making. V"Y~~ \ ,.. . . ~ Vincent G. rocklebank 15342 Sky King Drive FI. Pierce, Florida p.2 f '-' (" f .." Federal Aviation Administration Southern Region, ASO-S20 P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 ISSUED DATE: 10/23/01 PETER PODURGIEL, SUITE 107 CPV CANA, LTD. 3S BRAINTRBE HILL OFFICE PARK BRAINTREE, MA 02184 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** AERONAUTICAL STUDY No: 01-ASO-7933-0E The Federal Aviation Administration has completed an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and. if applicable, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: NEW SMOKESTACK LOCATED AT T1tE CPV CANA POWER GENERATION FACILITY. PORT ST. LUCIE FL 27-17-08.51 NAn 83 080-29-08.09 170 feet above ground level (AGL) 202 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronauticai study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition (a) , if any, is (are) met: Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K Change 1. Description: Location: Latitude: Longitude: Heights: This determination expires on 04/23/03 unless: (al extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office or (bl the conatruction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an a~plication for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction or on the date the FCC aenies the application. - . . ._ NOTE.;· - REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF _THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED TO THIS OFFICE AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. . This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency (iesl changes in coordinates, heights, frequency (ies) or use will void this determination. Any future construction description which and power. Any of greater power or.alteration, '-' -.,J CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \.. '- .../'./ , ""=-------; / '"'" ¡:-'.-.~,""'J./ ~,<,~~ :'::-':~~2:;··< A CITY FOR ALL AGES December 19, 2001 IlEC 2 6 200i Mr. Stefan Matthes, Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Letter sent via fax to 462-1581 L Re: Competitive Power Ventures CPV Cana Generating Facility St. Lucie County Florida Dear Mr. Matthes: The City of Port St. Lude Is host to Competitive Power Ventures (CPV) power project presently under construction in the LTC Ranch Industrial Park. located in Port St. Lucie. As a result of our experience with CPV, we welcome the proposed CPV Cana project as a neighbor. I am writing to share my favorable impression of CPV and the excellent relationship that the City of Port St. Lucie has experienced during the development and approval process of their project. CPV, and in particular PeterPodurgiel, Vice President of Development, have proven to be very credible, have been responsive to our requests and have honored their commitments to the City of Port St. Lucie in a timely manner. CPV has proven experience in the development of electrical generating facilities, and as a result of its performance has gained considerable respect in the development community. I was especially impressed by the development team assembled by CPV and the personal attention given to all aspects of their project. Not only are we pleased with the economic benefit these projects bring to our community and to St. Lucie County, but perhaps of equal importance is the environmental stewardship of CPV. These facilities utilize the most 121 SW. Port St. Lucie Boulevard' Port St. Lucie, FL 34984·5099·561/871-5225 . 661/878 QOQ7 01/13/02 2' FA! ~~-_.- [ñì Œ Œ IT. n ~,1 ..r~ ;.," \ ~~ r - --' .... \r~\\ JI\N I 5 20n~ ': c¿' : ~L-~:T~"."-, -~"'j ,: L'- "I J ....' ¡. . - ___;..... \.. "_ ...... ~ I '. @01 ...." ~tulrt~. Driver 12451 Pier Cub Terrace Port St. Lucie, FL .149g, January 10, ZOOZ St Lucie County Commissioners St Lucie County RE: Proposed Power Genmting Plant on RBnge Line KoadlGlades Cut-OtI Dear County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre As a concerned resident ofT reasure Coast Air Park Community, 1 am especially concerned with the proposed building of a Power GcÍlcroting Plant so close to my home ønd airspace. J feel that this plllDt will jcopllIÙÍZe not only my lifestyle, but my right to fly when the FAA closes airspace around power plants due to terrorist threats_ r also feel that the change of 20DÎng for this area will have a detrimental. effect not only on my property value, but on the whole community and jeopardize any future home development here in TeAP. I am also concerned about the environmental impact I huge generating power plant will have on our agricultural area, and would like these concerns to be considered. Our Air Park was p1Bnned in this rural area 50 as not to disturb others with the comÌIIgS and goings of our lifestyle, now we find that others are not as considerate regarding our welfare. r urge you to delay YOlD' decision until all of these issues can be properly addressed and the existing area homeowners are gÎven an opportunity to be heard. We ask that you address our concerns and investigute the impact of this proposed generating power plant on all residents of the area before any further action is considered by the County Commissioners. ,~//0 A,J'· t~~~ \:prO eI)~ ~ø~ [õ) § ~ § I W II ~I lrJ .22- l!!J C PV CA¡.JA €.è- 0'(:"0 l S- .... C!.M -0\-001 '- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5T LUC_!ESQ.lJ.~~~___. .,~~_._--- - January 10, 2002 St. Lucie County Commissioners St. Lucie County RE: Proposed Power Generating Plant on Range Line Road/Glades Cut-Off Dear County Commisioners, As a concerned resident of Treasure Coast Air Park Community, I am especially concerned with the proposed building of a Power Generating Plant so close to my home and airspace. I feel that this plant will jeopardize not only my lifestyle, but my right to fly when the FAA closes airspace around power plants due to terrorist threats. I also feel that the change of zoning for this area will have a detrimental effect not only on my property value, but on the whole community and jeopardize any future home development here in TCAP. I am also concerned about the environmental impact a huge generating power plant will have on our agricultural area, and would like these concerns to be considered. Our Air Park was planned in this rural area so as not to disturb others with the comings and goings of our lifestyle, now we find that others are not as considerate regarding our welfare. I urge you to delay your decision until all of these issues can be properly addressed and the existing area homeowners are given an opportunity to be heard. We ask that you address our concerns and investigate the impact of this proposed generating power plant on all residents of the area before any further action is considered by the County Commissioners. Respectfully, ~~~ ~ ...",,¡ AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2002 7:00 P.M. CPV CANA, LTD., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from thi! lH (Industrial, Heavy), and U (Utilities) Zoning District to the U (Utilities) Zoning District following described property: Location: West side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile so/dID Glades Cut-Off Road. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronicdly recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record vI the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearÙt.g will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners January 21, 2002. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The TrifJ!m.e, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on January 23, 2002. File No. RZ-01-015 '- 51. lUOE COUNTY IOAl:O Of CQMMlSSlONElS PUBliC HEAliNG AGfHOA febnøy s: 2002 TO wtiONI IT MAY cONCElN: NOflCE Is....-.by ghWl'," ~...... ~ 11.00.03 of..... St.l.ucNCounIy l.dnd De¥IIofllMIII Code ond....~dtheSt.lllCle~~ 1'tøn.thefolow¡ngappllconhhaw~thatltle$t. l.ud'ICooootyBoardalConl/lll~eomlchrlhelrfol. lowing roquonh' I 1 eN CAN.... LTD for a Cho"lltl kl Zoning from fhe IH (InduslriQI, He<l"'Yl and U (Util!l~)ZOlllng Districh 10 the U ! IUtilitie.lloning O¡$trl~ fOf ,he lollowH'lg cMlCribed: properTy: POf(1l11, COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST COINER Of SECßON 1 TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, R¡i.NGE 3ð EAST, S1. LUCie "OUNn. FLO'l10A.; THENCE RUNS SOOoOO's.wW' AlONG THE EAST llNf OF SECTION 1, A. OIST"-NCE Of 2891.98 fEET, TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING, ;;E~E~~I~~Nl~~~~~É ~~~63~~Er-i~E~~~1 ~~NC~8~~~aér~..£~S~~~i~ ~6fO J~~l Æ£T; THENCE IUN N89"59'06"Y'1. A DISTANCE Ofl ~~~.~~~ ~E~~I~AN ~~:;;'~~I MfNT A DISTANCE Of 1869.78 FEET; THENŒ RUN SOWOO·54........ A DISTANCE Of 635.03 fEET; THENCE l«JN SW59'06·E, A DISTANCE OF 1320.00 ÆfT TO THE POINT Of IfGINHING; AU. LYING AND IfING IN SECTION I, TOWNSHIP 37 SOOTH. RANGE 31 EAST, ST. LUOE COUNTY, flORID.... AND CONTAIN-~ ING 36_06 ACRES MOlE OR LESS. I Por~2.: A .....RCEl Of lAND, IN SECnON 1. TOWNSHIP 31, SOUl'H. RANGE 38 EAST. ST_ LUCIE COUNTY, fLORID SþJD 'ARCElIS DESCRIBED I>S fOllOWS, COMMeNCE AT niE NQlTHWT OCRHEI Of SECTION I, n-tENCt RUN SOOOOO'S.fW, ALONG lliE EAST UN Of SECTION I.... DtSTANCf: Of 2897.91 ffET; THENCE RUN N89"'5V'06"W, _,,, D'STÞ.NCfOf 13:20-00 FEET THENCE RUN NOlrOQ'54-e. ... D1STANCf Of W.D fEET, TO THE SOUTHEASTEtlY UHE Of THE 660 WIDE flOllDA'1'OWEI: AND UGHT:COIRANf ~~ MENT, AS DESClJIED IN 0Ff1OAL,1ECOID$ lOOK 333. AT ,AGE 248. Of THE PU8UCIKOIDS Of ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDIo. AND THE POI,NT - OF, IEGlNNIN<>. , _. i THENCE CONT1NliE, ~54-e. A ~ANCE OF ( '31M fEfT. TO lHE-NQITHWEST9lY UNE OF SAID EASEMfNT, SAID UNE AlSO IElNG THE -SOUTH£A$T- ERlY UNE Of TH£ 150 fOOT 'MOE FLOlIDA fAST CO...5T IAILIOId)', IIGHT;.oF-·WAY¡ -THEN -IUN S«"'46'OCfW. ALONG $AID IIGHT~WAY UHf. A DlSTANŒ0f45UI ,FW¡~ IlJt'.I SOO'OQ'sc"W, " DISTANCE Of 653.38 fEET. 'l'KENCE RUN SU"46'«fW. 'A DlSTANa QfUl6.39 fEET; THENCE tuN, socroo'54"W, A DISTANCE: Of 21401 fEET, TO ntE, ,SAID $OlJTHfASTEItI.V UN! OF DiE 660 fOOT WIDE ROtIDA POW'EI AND lIGHT COlMAN'( !A$E. MlNT¡ TH6'<E ~ ~.46~. ALONG SAID. SQUTHWTE...V UN!. It DISTANCE Of 1869.18 fHT, TO THE POINT Of IIEGIl\IHI'fG,. THE ABOVE' DESCIIIfD .AICÉl CONTAINS 15.446 ACRES. MORE Ot l!SS.' ,-~ '. \ ... .AlCEl OF lAND iN SKTION t, TOWNSHIP -37 \' SOUTH. lANGl3l!AST, ST. lUCIE COUNTY, fLORID.... SAID '''RallS 0E$Cl11ED AS fOLlOWSol C~P~ ~=;'~,~uciÉ ( COUNTY, flOlIDA., THENCE RUN S~OO'5'("W ALONG THE fAST um: Of SÞJD SecnoN I, It. DIS- TANCE Of 2567." FEfT,;TO A rOlN"lOF &EGlNNING, THENCE CONnNUE ~"W,AI.ONG niE EAST UHf,OF, SAID SECT10N '.. A DlSTÞ.NÇE Of 330.00 fEET, THENCE ruN Nl9"59'06"W ~ DlSTANa Of 1320 fEET, THENCEIUM ~5<l~AOIST,t.N(E Of 330.00 fE, niENŒS87'"5'l'06'"f " DISTANCE Of 1320 fEET TO THf f'9 NT'Of IEGINNING. ALL lYING AND BEI'-IG IN SECf1()t.f t. TOWN$tW, 37 SOUTH. IV.NGE 38 EAST, 51. lUCIf COUNrt.- fl,0I1OA. AND CONTAINING 10.00 ACU$MOIE 01 lESS. ~W_·"r.lIarijeLNIoad.~YO.60 mIlelOUthdGbMCut.()ffIGcld. 1. eN CAN.... l rr '1 Condi1konal UM p_m/t k> allow !he I ~"strvdloo 0'....,;. k: po_ ~ plg'" ¡" It.. U (Utilities) 101.. id for 11>. foll~ dtlKribed "'""""" Parol 1, COIY.MENC! AT THE NOITHEAST CORNER Of SECTtON 1, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 3ð &,ST, ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FlOlIDA; THENCE tUNS' SQOoOO'5.<l"W ALONG THE EAST lINE OF SECT10N 1, ,., DISTANCE Of 2891.'9" fEET. TO THE POfNT Of BEGINNING¡ THENCE 'UN sOO"ocr~4-W, ALONG THE EAST UHE Of SfCTlQN 1, A DISTANCE OF 362.83 fEET; THENCf IUN. N89°59'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 660 fEET¡ THENCE IIUN SoO"OO·S.¡"W. A DIST....NCE Of 330.00 fEET. THENCE RUN NB9"59'Q6aw. A DIST....NCE Of 1976.38 fEET; THENCE RUN N44°46·00"'E, AlONG THE E....ST UNE OF A fl()l110A POWE~ AND UGHT EASE. MENT, A DISTANCE Of IB69.7B fEFl; THENCE .RUN SOO"OO'S4-W, A DISTANCE Of 635.03 fEET; THENCE ~UN sa9"S'TOówE. A DISTANCE OF 1320.00 fEET TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING; Allly!NG AND 8EING IN SECTION I. TOWNStHf' 37 SOUTH. IlANGE 38 EAST, ST. tuCiE COUNTY. HOIlIO^. AND CONTAIN- ING 36,06 ACRES MORE OR lESS p",cel2: A P^IICEl Of LAND IN SECTION 1. TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE JI! EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY. flŒ¡O.... SAID PARCEL IS DESCRI8ED....S fOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NOIITHEAST QCIINER Of SECTION " THENCE RUN SOO"OO'54W, ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SECTION 1. A DISTANCE Of 2897.9B fEET; THENCE RUN N89"S9'06"W, ... OISTANCE Of 1320.00 fEET; THENCE RUN NOO"OO·S.4wE. A DISTANCE OF 635.03 fEET TO THE SQUTt1EASTERl Y UNE Of THE 6óO FOOT WIoe fLOR!DA f'QW(-fl: ANO LIGHT COMPANY EASE- I ~~~t;A~Si:~EgF 17H~~~~~:-¿ ::¿g:: ~~~ I LUCIE COUNTY. flORIDA. A,ND THE POINT OF ~ BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NOODOO'5¿~E, A. ClST"NCE Of 937.46 FEET, TO THE NORTHWESTERlY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT, SAID UHE ALSO BEING THE SQUTHEAST- EIll Y LINE OF THE 1 SO fOOT WIDE FLORIDA E1\5T CO...ST RAIlROAO RIGHT-Of-W....Y: THEN RUN SU0.(.6'OO-W. ALONG SAID RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE. " DISTANCE OF 653.38 FEU; THENCE RUN SOQ"'OO'504"W, A ÐISTANa Of 653.38 fEfT; THENCE RUN s.u°.4ó'OO"W'. ... OISTANCE. Of 1216.39 fEET; THENCE RUN SQO"OO'54-W, A OlST~E Of 2&.4.08 fEET, TO THE SAID SOUTHEASTERLY UHE OF THE 660 FOOT WIDE ROIID" POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE IUN ~o~'OO"W, AlONG SAID SQUTHEASTERlYUNE. A DtSTANCE OF 1869.78 fEET. TO THE f'OlNT Of IEGlNNING. THE .. AIO'Æ 0ESCI18fD .ARCB. CONTAINS 15..<1146 M:lES,; MOlE 01 LESS. ~~ " pARC£\. Of lAND IN SECTlON _ I, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH; RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE cou~ flORIDA" , SAID p/dCEl is DESCRI8ED ...s FOlL~ ,\ COMMENŒ AT THE HE CORNEIl- Of.sKnoH 1,1 TOWNSHIP )7 SQt.Il'H. RANGE 38 WT. ST. lUClf ~~TYnJl~~,J':i~~I~O~~SC~ TANCE Of 2567.98 fEET, TO·... fIOIHT OF IEGlNNING, THENCEC~I!. .$OO'"OO'S4.-W AlONG THE fAST lINE Of SAID SECT10N 1, ... ·DlSTANCE_·Of 330.00 FEET; ll-lENCf IUN N89"59'06-W A DISTANt! Of 1320 ffET. THeNCE tuN Nl)l.'fOO'54'"f A D1ST ANa OF 330,00 -fUT, THENCE ss9"'59'06"E A DISTANCE OF 1320 fEET TO THE POINT Of 1fQNN1NG. ALL 1.Y1HG AND aElNGIN SECTION ·1, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH. lAf'«j.E 38 EAST. ST. LUOE C~~ flORIDA. AND CQNT1JN"G 1 0.00 ACRES MOlE Ot lESS. loa2tIoli:W_....oItong.llnlo-;.~o.6Ð .....wUtl¡OfGladaCut..()lf1ood. I'UIlIC l'1E.utNGS WIll be MId ~ COMMIuIotl Chambtn. =~~=Á~fort~~ . oft.~·s. 2002..beg\MIng at 1:00 P.M. Of In,oon ~_pcmlbk . puisu...tn TO Sed\on 286.0 lOS, fIartdcl $tah.lM. I a ptt- d d«ldelto Oflf*JIfIrI't dKWcIrl.,1IOC:ld.b.,.oboard. ::,:~Ian~h::øIO...:1a~~ ~~=:;tof~-'=='-::b~ wt.IctI. (W(Ofd .1ndIda "" ~ ,*..wIIra upan whIdIlMoppeaI h 10 bI bosed. IOI.RD OfCQMMISSIONE.S ST, lUCIE COl/NTY. flOlIDA ISI Doug c-d. CHAIRMAN 'ubIish:J0l0I.ICIry'22,1OO2 I 2332852 ~ "-' ( (" ~ Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 12/20/01 File Number RZ-01-015 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Manager ÇV\f..., December 14, 2001 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Application of CPV CANA, Ltd. for a Change in Zoning from the IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning Districts to the U (Utilities) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-01-015) LOCATION: West side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. EXISITNG ZONING: IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) PROPOSED ZONING: U (Utilities) IND (Industrial) LAND USE DESIGNATION: PARCEL SIZE: 61.54 acres PROPOSED USE: Electric Generation Plant PERMITTED USES: Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(W) U (Utilities) - contains the designated uses which are permitted by right, permitted as an accessory use, or permitted through the conditional use process. Any use designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approvals. . Any use not found within the zoning district regulations are designated as prohibited uses for that district SURROUNDING ZONING: IH and U to the north, south, and northwest. AG-5 (Agricultural- 1 du/5 acres) to the east and north. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is industrial, pasture land, and citrus groves. '-' ( (' ."",J December 14, 2001 Page 2 Subject: CPV Cana, Ltd. RZ-01-015 The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is IND and AG-5 (Agricultural - 5). FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #3 (250 West Prima Vista Boulevard), is located approximately 11 miles to the northeast. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is served by an on-site vve!! and septic system. The plant operations will be cooled by water from the Floridan Aquifer. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Range Line Road is 100 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The U Zoning District is compatible with the IND Future Land Use and allows electric generation plants as.a conditional use, subject to Board of County Commission approval. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The IND Land Use is compatible with '-' ( ( ...." December 14, 2001 Page 3 Subject: CPV Cana, Ltd. RZ-01-015 the U Zoning District and a portion of the subject property is already zoned Utilities. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general use of the immediate surrounding area of the subject property is industrial, citrus groves, and pasture land. Some residences are located along Glades Cut-Off Road and McCarty Road to the west across the FEC Railway Line. The property abuts the Florida East Coast Railway line and FP&L easement, which has 230 KV and 500 KV electrical transmission lines crossing over it to the immediate west. Florida Tire Recycling and Chern-Tee are two of the industrial uses located to the north. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including b~t not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The proposed electric generation plant must comply with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's air pollution control regulations. The proposed electric generation facility is located in an area designated for heavy industrial and utilities uses. A gas transmission line is proposed for the vicinity in which the plant is to be located. The subject property will '-' ( ( "wìÎ '\,~ December 14, 2001 Page 4 Subject: CPV Cana, Ltd. RZ-01-015 have access to the power grid of the Florida Power & Light lines along the west property lines. The main source of air emissions from the proposed plant will be the combustion turbine. Major pollutants emitted during plant operations are S02, NOx, (PM10), carbon monoxide (CO), and volatile organic compounds (VOC). The levels are as follows: Pollutant Potential Emissions (TonslYear) NOx 96 S02 76 CO 226 PM1Q 96 VOC 15 Since the projected emissions of these pollutants are less than allowed within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations, as well as, health based National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NMOS), the proposed power plant is not expected to have significant impact on air quality. At full load operation of the power facility, the project is expected to generate continuous noise levels on a 24-hour basis. The existing sources of environmental noise within the project area include, but are not limited to, vehicular traffic movements on local and distant roadways, occasional distant aircrafts, and intermittent noise from industrial activities and sounds from cows, dogs, birds, and insects. According to the applicant's Sound Report, the estimated maximum noise decibel level of the facility at the proposed site boundary is 65 dBA or less. At distances farther away from the site, the facility sound levels will be considerably below the allowed St. Lucie County decibel levels. In addition, the applicant proposes to add various noise suppression devices to further restrict noise emissions from the proposed facility. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern will occur with this change in zoning. The surrounding parcels of property are designated for industrial and some agricultural uses. The rezoning of the subject property to the U '-" ( (" -.""i December 14, 2001 Page 5 SUbject: CPV Cana, Ltd. RZ-01-015 Zoning District would allow for a use that is consistent with the existing industrial uses. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in contlict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS The applicant, CPV Cana, Ltd., has requested this change in zoning from the IH (Industrial, Heavy) and U (Utilities) Zoning Districts to the U (Utilities) Zoning District in order to develop an electric generation plant on the subject property. If the requested change in zoning is approved, CPV Cana will also seek a conditional use permit to allow an electric generation plant in the Utilities Zoning District. The proposed zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general use of the immediate surrounding area of the subject property is industrial, citrus groves, and pasture land. Some residences are located along Glades Cut-Off Road and McCarty Road to the west across the FEC Railway Line. The property abuts the Florida East Coast Railway line and FP&L easement, which has 230 KV and 500 KV electrical transmission lines crossing over it to the immediate west. Florida Tire Recycling and Chem-Tex are two of the industrial uses located to the north. Attached is a copy of Section 3.01.030fý) - U (Utilities), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, which delineates the permitted, accessory, and conditional uses allowed in the Utilities Zoning District. If the change in zoning request is approved, the applicant, by right, would be allowed to establish any of the uses under the Permitted Uses section. Any use under the Accessory Uses section would be allowed only íí one or more of the permitted uses exist on the subject property. Any use under the Conditional Uses section could only be allowed if it first receives approval through the Board of County Commissioners. Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. "-' c ( """ December 14, 2001 Page 6 Subject: CPV Cana, Ltd. RZ-01-015 If you have any questions on this matter, please contact this office. Attachmenl hf cc: County Administrator County Attorney Scott Glaubitz File "- ( ( .." Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested change in zoning. MOTION TO APPROVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE APPLICATION OF CPV CANA, LTD., FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE IH (INDUSTRIAL, HEAVY) AND U (UTILITIES) ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE U (UTILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE .... [CITE REASON[S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. MOTION TO DENY: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF CPV CANA, LTD., FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE IH (INDUSTRIAL, HEAVY) AND U (UTILITIES) ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE U (UTILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE.... [CITE REASON[S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. '--' (' (k ., AGENDA - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20,2001 7:00 P.M. CPV CANA, LTD., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the IH (Industrial, Heavy), and U (Utilities) Zoning District to the U (Utilities) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: West side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners December 10, 2001. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on December 8, 2001. File No. RZ-01-015 r·~~~-,- ~-~ri ~ ..~; ~'? --;' 9r· ",) Nt'f"lV'lV) \0 ....... 0'\ 00 .- t- 0'\ 0'\ 0 N "'....'" _ r<"'l ~ M f"r'I ____ . II I : I I"" " " I .... 'I I '1.5 -J....J ..J ..JI....J , I!~~~L~-",l~-~l~ I II '" I", II'~ H: I", 1m ,= I~ ~ Ë!:¡ .2 =< ,":z .- < 'ãu I~~ 1$ U il~ ... " ~ ~ = .... "'" Ie.... Q.Q I~ ~ I Q ofJ ilÈg l' == I I' = .... ,I e " n e ;::¡ \10 U ¡,U ... ¡I'õ .2 ¡:..... ..... ¡I c .~ n~ ...¡ I.... OJ) ... I: I œ:'= I eo';¡ IQ ~ u -, "·"'i--·-- ~ '., ,'~ ~ '" '" '" '" ..... , '" '" 0 0 ";> , , ";> ~ ~ 00 .. 00 ..... '" èf.. '" ..... '" ~ '" .. '" .. .. '" .. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" I 'dJ ,I , I I , ....¡....¡....¡....¡ I....¡....¡ I -~ ~ ~ El~J~- ( ..."" ,I il I "'" I I I I 1'1 ~, .5 Õ "'01' "I' 4) r I. 'I ..0 _:::s co $oJ ~I I , I o ,.g ~I:: -51 Æl'~l~' I:>-J 1 'II "'01 u t:: ~CI)""" Q.. c.. ~t::1 . "j ~ 'U£"~I]I ¿j:~! 15:~, 15 15'~ ¿j .i.1l.,.:gI.,.JI 0' 0."*", "-, ::E,,,,, "" ~ "' _ )::E::E~ I . i II I Ii I ! I Ii I Vii ci,¡ Ii '"'0."'0. ¡, ¡~I~¡ II· ' 1~I~i 1=]'_1 f VI V'l I ¡:;'¡¡:;(J_I I ! ..... I~I Iii ! ~~ l,f); ,ooi ~,:r \0; l(): O\I~ ~I ....¡ '.IOi'Olool.gI ~"',-i."'·;;¡ 01 :u~i~I~!- Sl:;:~I~ E- t¡ t,¡ ><, ><1 ><1 ><1.51 01 ><' ><1t1.l .:!:I¡ i !; 01 0 0 0 ..... C01 01 0: en c::: 'I' "0 I' o:l o:ll o:lj o:l ]: 'lo:l o:ll_j "". : "O!¡OiO!OiO ~ q 0loi~ r--.i ;l<iL"'i."'L,,=,lc,.~ ,,:<, "'. ",~d",¡ 1 : ;! ,) ¡ ~ ¡ ! i: I :, \O;~ ': I I I : ' I Ii. ~I.¡ i í.' ì '::EI 'II i !,.... "~,..o! ;I~¡i i ¡ I.· ¡ i I~ ~ : 'I~~~'--i-----'---+- I :: ¡Ii ! i I I II~II ¡ IIII U~ I B ~'j ¡! !!:"¡) 01 j II ell ill I"'" - I 1.1~'~li ! i' .. '.: ~ ~ ' J . ¡~-:-- ---+-t- 1...,.11 'i I ! QJ!i ¡ :: I i- IX I 'II e:! I : ' I i 31-", ~II ' , , : 1 ",.. Il~L++t+ 1 ~ ~ I II ill 1 1 . I I II Illjl.:~..,JJ... i I ~I' I~ 'I' i ii' :II~' i nHi II I~i !~! H ¡' j+'T II II ' Iii I ° I ¡ I 'I i! : ¡ . ,~I .E i ! I II II I r I I~ '" 01 I I 1°1 "'" ;.:: '" I d.s l~ u ~l i :: U .š¡ ! I~I: ~ ~~. 188 )1"0 en , ¡ e: :ø:E I-- I .... ,! ¡¡ lh, I ï= i , e ] ~ Ii] l II "'¡1-i!l ~I:¡¡ ~ -i!l .!!1 0 .... e I ::l ¡;.¡ U'e õi ,,", -= ;'3 .- ø: Cl '¡ u 0 ~ 0 ::1.-= I tI] en z'<ooæ":.E::E::E~{3. ;:¡;:¡ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ :§ :;J = S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ QJO\O\dMMt---M('f')"":- < ~:;'â - ~ ~ ~ ~ :,; ~ I;¡ -:;; ~ 1,,~II;~j,~ri.~ll~!~~I~I!~bl. 'I~I~ ~ '1<,:'0:",1- "'¡"'i"'N'O: ¡ ,'" '" :i~!j .: ." . I ! i ¡ 1 ~:' ¡ . . " ¡ !~~-H~--4--j --~- r__! + ~--~ --1-+- ~i '¡~'8 g:~¡~i8jl~'õj;gI~:¡ igl~ 'i ¡IO 0 OiOjNIO 0 -- -, :g 8 111.'11:11 § § §'~I§I~ ~ ~ ~ § !§ 8 : ~ 8 N - -,M "l:f' - - "I:t M 1- ~ !,~ - ~ :! =I=I~ ~ = ~:: I::: ~ Ii =: ~ õ õ ÕIÕ õ õ õ õ Õ 00'3 __ il E.:~}_:_:_~:__:i N N N N N N N 0 " ... - ~ ... Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5F 02/05/02 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] Quasi-JD [ X ] SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 02-032 granting a Conditional Use Pennit to allow for the construction and operation of a 250-megawatt electric generalion plant, to be known as CPV CANA, LTD., in the U (Utilities) Zoning District for property located on the west side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: CPV CANA, Ltd., has requested a conditional use pennit for 61.54 acres of land located on the west side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. The stated purpose for the conditional use is to allow the construction and operation of a 250- magewatt electric generation plant in the U (Utilities) Zoning District, subject to Board of County Commissioners approval. (File No: CU-01-007) FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: At the December 20, 2001, public hearing on this matter, the SI. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 2 (Mr. Grande and Mr. Hearn), with one member (Mr. Akins) absent, recommended approval for the requested conditional use pennit. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-032. COMMISSION ACTION: D APPROVED CJ DENIED [!]OTHER Continue for Board discussion only until 2/19 6PM. CONCURRENCE;; 7/-v~ Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Depl: Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgl. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: '-' ~ Commission Review: February 5, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Assistant Community Development Director DATE: January 31,2002 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 02-032, which would grant the petition of CPV CANA, Ltd., for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 250-megawatt, electrical generating plant, to be known as CPV CANA, LTD., in the U (Utilities) Zoning District. LOCATION: West side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed electric generating plant is a gas- fired, 250-megawatt facility. The plant will utilize a combined cycle generating unit to produce up to 175 megawatts of electrical power from its gas turbines and up to 75 megawatts of electrical power from its steam generator recovery system. The primary fuel used by the turbines will be natural gas, with the capability of using sulfur (0.05%) No. 2 distillate fuel oil as a back-up fuel. EXISTING ZONING: U (Utilities) - (See RZ-01-015) IND (Industrial) LAND USE DESIGNATION: PARCEL SIZE: 61.54 acres SURROUNDING ZONING: IH and U to the north, south, and northwest. AG-5 (Agricultural- 1 du/5 acres) to the east and north. The general existing use surrounding the property is industrial, pasture land, and citrus groves. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is IND and AG-5 (Agricultural - 5). FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #14 (St. Lucie West Boulevard), is located approximately 7.5 miles to the northeast. \.r -..."I January 30, 2002 Page 2 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: CU-01-007/RZ-01-015/MJSP-01-005 UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is served by an on-site well and septic system. The plant operations will be cooled by water from the Floridan Aquifer. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Range Line Road is 100 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. **************************************************** This petition is for a combination of Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval. As such, it is required to satisfy both the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 and Section 11.02.09 of the County's Land Development Code. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use has been determined to not be in conflict with any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.03(W)(7), U (Utilities) Zoning District, allows electrical generating plants as conditional uses. As noted in the comments below, the proposed site development plan that accompanies this request for a conditional use permit has been determined to meet the minimum standards of the Lanct Development Code. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The proposed site is . located within an area zoned for heavy industrial uses. The proposed utility use of this property is considered to be compatible with the general characteristics of the surrounding properties (industrial uses) located to the north and south of this site. Agriculturally zoned '-' ...." January 30, 2002 Page 3 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: CU-01-007/RZ-01-015/MJSP-01-005 properties surround this industrial area. There is a proposed natural gas pipeline (Gulfstream) to be located along the northwest corner of the subject property. Construction of this gas line is expected to take place within the next 12-18 months. The subject property will have access to the power grid through the northwestern property line. The principal source of air emissions from the electrical generating plant will be from the combined cycle combustion turbine generator. The table below outlines the anticipated level of pollution to be generated from this facility: Pollutant Threshold for Major Potential Emissions Sources CTonsNear) N02 40 96 S02 40 76 CO 100 226 PM 25 96 PM10 15 96 . VOC 40 15 Since the projected emissions of N02, CO, PM/PM-10 and S02 are all greater than their respective emissions thresholds, the project is considered a major source of emissions as defined by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. A permit from the EPA will be required with a demonstration that there will be no violation of any National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and that no allowable levels of pollutants will be exceeded. The applicant's EPA application, air quality analysis, and modeling indicate that the proposed electrical generating plant will not cause a significant degradation of air quality and that the plant will be in compliance with all state and federal ambient air quality regulations. The attached Figure 1 compares the proposed project emission rates to existing power plants and Figure 2 compares the proposed project emission rates to the other recently approved power plants. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage struçtures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The proposed property will receive water through an on-site well and sewer service through a septic system for all buildings proposed for this site. The access into the site is proposed as a single access from Range Line Road. Although the site is adjacent to Glades Cut-Off Road, the railroad tracks prohibit access onto Glades Cut-Off Road. As part of the construction of the proposed '- -...""I January 30, 2002 Page 4 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: CU-01-007/RZ-01-015/MJSP-01-00S project, the developer shall be required to construct a dedicated right turn lane into this project site. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The subject property is predominantly a pasture with degraded remnants of both pine fJatwoods and small freshwater marshes. In addition, 10 acres of the subject property is severely impacted by an overabundance of Brazilian Pepper. A condition of the site plan will be that all exotics are removed from the site at the time of construction of the electrical generating plant. ****************************************************** STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT/SITE PLAN REVIEW In addition to the minimum standards of review and project development set out in Section 7.00.00, Section 11 .02.07, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum Standards of Review for all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for Major Site Plan approval, utilizing these requirements and notes the following: A. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed building and use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of this Code, the Sf. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County, and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. The proposed CPV CANA electrical generating plant is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. These policies include, but are not limited to: Objective 1.1.11 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states th-at the County shall work with interested groups and agencies to increase and broaden the economic base while expanding existing business and industrial opportunities. The proposed electrical generating plant will provide a continuous economic benefit to the County. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. B. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES a. The proposed building or use wíll not have an undue adverse affect upon nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utílíty ~ ...I January 30, 2002 Page 5 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: CU-01-007/RZ-01-015/MJSP-01-005 facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed development is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The proposed site is located within an area zoned for heavy industrial uses. The proposed utility use is more compatible with the general characteristics of the surrounding properties (industrial uses) located to the north and south. The properties to the east and west are agriculturally zoned. There is a proposed natural gas pipeline (Gulfstream) to be located along the northwest comer of the subject property. Construction of this gas line is expected to take place in the next few years. The subject property will have access to the power grid through the northwestern property line. The development of the electrical generating plant is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The proposed property will receive water through an on-site well and sewer service through a septic system for all buildings proposed for this site. The access into the site is proposed as a single access from Range Line Road. Although the site is adjacent to Glades Cut-Off Road, the railroad tracks prohibit access onto Glades Cut-Off Road. As part of the construction of the proposed project, the developer shall be required to construct a dedicated right turn lane into this project site. b. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. The developer has designed this project in a manner that will buffer the residential properties to the south. These properties are located approximately 3 miles away from the proposed plant. The primary construction area for the proposed electrical plant will be adjacent to Range Line Road. The developer will be installing landscape buffers along all perimeter property lines. c. The proposed building or use will be constructed, a"anged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of the neighboring properties. C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public Facilities. '-' ...., January 30, 2002 Page 6 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: CU-01-007/RZ-01-015/MJSP-01-005 The subject property will receive water services through an on-site well and sewer services through an onsite septic system. D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION The applicant has obtained from the Sf. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written confirmation, or has otherwise demonstrated by substantial credible evidence, that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written confirmation that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES The proposed building or use will be serviced by adequate school facilities The applicant is proposing a utility use that will not impact school facilities. F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section 1.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, 'Natural Environment Analysis; of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Horne and Associates, Inc. (August 1982). No protected plant species were observed within the subject property. The project site does not appear to provide significant nesting or foraging habitat for other listed species. As this is a disturbed site, a condition of approval will be that the developer removes all exotic vegetation from the site as a part of construction. COMMENTS The petitioner, CPV CANA, Ltd., is seeking approval for a conditional use permit in order to construct and operate a 250 megawatt, electric generating plant for property located on the west side of Range Line Road, Y:z mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road, in the U (Utilities) Zoning District. The project will be known as CPV CANA, Ltd. Electrical generating plants are allowed as conditional uses in the U (Utilities) Zoning District upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners. At the Planning and Zoning hearing, several issues and questions were brought up by the public. We will address each of these concerns as follows: ."", ~ January 30, 2002 Page 7 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: CU-01-007/RZ-01-015/MJSP-01-005 · Were the petitions for the power plant properly noticed and advertised? The petitions for rezoning and conditional use were advertised and notified within the parameters of the Land Development Code, which requires that advertisements and notifications for each public hearing be posted and/or mailed a minimum of 10 days prior to the hearing. A sign indicating the date, time, and place of the public hearings for the petition is also required to be erected on the subject property a minimum of 10 days prior to the public hearings. · Will the power plant facility utilize the existing power lines or will they construct new lines? Where does the power go when it is generated, does it stay in the area or is it sold to other areas? The proposed power plant will utilize the existing power lines located on the Florida Power & Light Company's easement located on the northwest end of the subject property. Once the electrical power is generated, it is transferred to where the market dictates that it be sent. · What was previously planned for the proposed site? Nothing is known to have been planned for the subject property, but it was previously owned by a concrete manufacturer, Precast Concrete. The IH (Industrial, Heavy) Zoning District allows many light and heavy industrial manufacturing activities to take place subject to meeting all other Code requirements. · What type of facility is being proposed? What type of fuel will the plant utilize? The proposed electric generating plant is a gas-fired, 250-megawatt facility. The plant will utilize a combined cycle generating unit to produce up to 175 megawatts of electrical power from its gas turbines and up to 75 megawatts of electrical power from its steam generator recovery system. The primary fuel used by the turbines will be natural gas, with the capability of using sulfur (0.05%) NO.2 distillate fuel oil as a back-up fuel. · What type of air emissions will be released from the facility? See #2 under Standards of Review above. · Will the facility affect the ground water that is currently being utilized by the Air Park? How will the well source and depth plus disposal of water be handled? The proposed facility will use the Floridan aquifer for the plant operations. Once the water is used by the plant operations, it is pumped down approximately 1,000 feet into the lower levels of the Floridan aquifer. This water then filters back up through the '-' ..,J January 30, 2002 Page 8 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: CU-01-007/RZ-01-015/MJSP-01-005 aquifer to be reused. The homes at the Treasure Coast Airpark obtains their well water from the surficial aquifer. The surficial aquifer is hydrologically separate from the Floridan aquifer. · Will the noise level from the plant effect any resident in the area? At what distance will the surrounding propetties be able to hear the power plant? According to the applicant's Sound Report, using night standards, the estimated maximum noise decibel level of the facility at the proposed site boundary is 65 dBA or less. At distances farther away from the site, the facility sound levels will be considerably below the minimum S1. Lucie County decibel levels. In addition, the applicant proposes to add various noise suppression devices to further restrict noise emissions from the proposed facility. Should noise become a problem after construction code enforcement action would be required. · How will this facility affect the existing flight patterns for the Air Park? Will this be a flight hazard? The proposed power plant should have no effect on the flight pattern of the Treasure Coast Airpark and is not anticipated to be a flight hazard. The runway for the airpark runs east-west and planes would not be expected to directly approach the power plant on either take off or landings approaches. · Is there really a need for an additional power plant in St. Lucie County, especially in this area? CPV Cana has stated that that additional power plants are needed in Florida for future electrical needs due to increasing population demands. The State of Florida has projected that a minimum of 20 additional electrical generating plants will be required to be constructed in the future to meet expected demands for electrical demands in the state. · What visual impact will occur from the construction of this power plant? Will it be landscaped along the roadways? The applicant will provide landscaping per S1. Lucie County Code requirements. This landscaping includes the enhancement of existing landscaping along the (rontage of the plant along Range Line Road. · How will this power plant affect the property values in the area? The proposed power plant is not expected to have a negative effect on property values in the area. The subject property is currently zoned for heavy industrial uses such as Tropicana and Continental Concrete. The construction and operation of a power plant is consistent with these uses. '-' ""'" January 30, 2002 Page 9 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: CU-01-007/RZ-01-015/MJSP-01-005 · How high are the proposed stacks for this facility? WiI/ the stack be lighted? The proposed power plant has one stack that is 170 feet in height. This height is approximately 50 feet higher than the existing power transmission lines adjacent to the proposed plant. The stack is not required to be lighted by the FAA, however, the petitioner has indicated a light could be attached to the top of the stack for safety purposes, if required by the County Commission. Such action would require an additional condition. · Will there be increased traffic on Glades Cut-Off Road/Range Line Road from this facility, specifically truck and rail traffic? The proposed plant will increase traffic on Range Line Road during the period of construction of the power plant. No increase in rail traffic is anticipated with the construction of this project. After construction is complete a standard shift at the plant would be expected to have 9 employees with three shifts. No negative impacts are expected as a result of the employee traffic. · If we have another terrorist attack and homeland security closes the area around power plants, wil/ the residents of the Air Park be grounded due to a no-fly zone? In the event of a national emergency, flight operations would be dictated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that this Board approve the requested conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any of the proposed structures or buildings on this site, all exotic vegetation found on the site shall be removed. 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits for any site construction, excluding site preparation work, the developer shall construct a dedicated right turn lane into this site at the project entrance. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permits the applicant shall submlfan amended landscape plan which depicts an additional 178 inches DSH of new trees along the perimeter of the site, to account for the relocated Internal landscaping for this site. In lieu of providing additional perimeter plantings as required under this condition, the applicant may pay to St. Lucie County the sum of $35,600.00 to be placed into a Forestry Restoration Fund to be administered by the County. The amount due is to be determined based upon the number of trees (DSH) inches required to meet minimum Interior landscape code, multiplied by 1.5 and then multiplied by $200.00 per Inch required. The condition shall not be Interpreted to relieve the applicant, his successor or assign from meeting all perimeter landscape requirements. ...... '-' January 30, 2002 Page 10 Subject: CPV CANA, Ltd. File No.: CU-01-007/RZ-01-015/MJSP-01-005 4. This approval is contingent upon the applicant using natural gas as its primary fuel with low sulfur fuel oil as a backup supply. Such use of the backup fuel supply shall not exceed 500 hours per year per turbine. Any increase in the number of oil operating hours for state and federal air quality permits shall require St. Lucie County Board approval as a modification to the conditional use. At the December 20, 2001, meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 2 (Mr. Hearn and Mr. Grande), with one member (Mr. Akins) absent, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval for the conditional use permit. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 02-032, which, if approved, would grant a conditional use permit to allow for the construction and operation of a gas-fired, 250-megawatt electrical generating plant in the U (Utilities) Zoning District. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED: Dennis J. Murphy, AICP Assistant Community Development Director hf cc: Scott Glaubitz Peter Podurgiel County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Planning Manager '-' ...I - .. aJ .c c: . aJ 3: ü :æ 6: - .Q Ü :::. $ l: aJ ii: .. ; a l1.. C) l: :¡:¡ III >< ~ W Ql - .;; L- a .s:::. - æ ~ ...."C CII :æ: CII .. g .. as :::I Q. .21 E N u.. a 0 (.) en III . .! -¡:- as .s:::. 0:: ~ l: Ul ~ a ïii Ql '0 :::; .!!! as x E "ê 0 W Ql Z > . - w u -e CII a ..... e 0- 0- as l: as (.) > a.. ü c: :e aJ :æ: <D .... '<t .... N .... o ... 00 <D '<t N o (J4-MLI\I/ql) Jo¡:>e:i UO!SS!W3 '- ..." >-- ~ lii :!2E :::r!:g- e ããi ... > J!l C Q) wC e .!! Q. ... ~ Q) 0 0 æOl Q. .- C a. 'C "C 1:: Q) ~ o ~ L1.Q. .-.. E C Q) ... ~a:: .J::. ... C ~ CÞ - w Q. ... :::r!: >.-7 g ~3: e:¡¡¡ N CÞ_ ~ 0 U.Q en CÞ_ Q) . ('II 0::- ä: ~ .-.. ! 0 1:: ... .J::. ::::I- e 0 ~ C)"C ::J L1. .- CÞ 0 Q) :::r!: LL"'O ~ ..... III :::J .c CoCÞ C ;:::. E "ëj ð o ::J Z o..J . IIJ .. S en .2 III 'E 0:: (\ e ~ 0 6: '(i) .! CJ E w III e III 0 > (\ Q. C (\ 0 CJ 6: CJ o o -.::t: ..... o o C'! ..... o o o ..... o o !Xl ci o o (( ci o o '<t ci o o C'! o o o o ci (Jlj-MW/Ql) Jo¡:>e~ UO!SS!W3 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '- ..., 1 2 3 RESOLUTION 02-032 FILE NO.: CU..()1..()07IRZ..()1..()15IMJSP..()1..()05 4 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 250-MEGAWATT ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT TO BE KNOWN AS CPV CANA, LTD.,. IN THE U (UTILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. 5 6 7 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. CPV Cana. Ltd.. presented a petition for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 250-megawatt electric generating plant, to be known as CPV CANA, Ltd.; in the U (Utilities) Zoning District for the property described in Part B. 2. On December 20,2001, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereinafter described request for a Conditional Use Permit in U (Utilities) Zoning for the property described in Part B. 3. On February 5, 2002, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and pOlicies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 5. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, ór other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. 6. The project will be served by on-site water and sewer services. File No.: CU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 February 5. 2002 Resolution 02-032 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1B 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 '- """" 7. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on February 5, 2002. SITE PLAN 8. CPV CANA. Ltd., presented a petition for a Site Plan approval to construct a 250- megawatt, electric generating plant, to be known as CPV CANA, Ltd., in the U (Utilities) Zoning District for the property described in Part 8. 9. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the petition for a Major Site Plan approval and found it to meet all technical requirements of the Land Development Code and to be consistent with the Future Land Use maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the conditions set forth in Part D of this Resolution. 10. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 11. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. 12. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. 13. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 14. The project will utilize an on-site water and sewer service. 15. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on February 5, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Çode, a Conditional Use Permit for CPV CANA, Ltd., to allow for the construction and operation of a 250-megawatt, electric generating plant, to be known as CPV CANA, Ltd., in U (Utilities) Zoning and as depicted on the site plan drawings described in Part D, is hereby granted for the property described in Part 8, subject to the conditions described in Part D. File No.: GU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 February 5.2002 Resolution 02-032 Page 2 ~ ....J 1 2 8. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 The property on which this Conditional Use Permit is being granted is described as follows: PARCEL 1: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUNS SOUTH 00DOO'54" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 2,897.98 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00DOO'54" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 362.83 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89D59'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 660 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00DOO'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89D59'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,976.38 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 44D46'OO" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EASEMENT, A DISTANCE OF 1 ,869.78 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00DOO'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 635.03 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89D59'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,320.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALL LYING AND BEING IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND CONTAINING 36.06 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 2: A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 1, THENCE RUN SOUTH OODOO'54 WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 2,897.98 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89D59'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,320.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH OODOO'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 635.03 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 660 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT, AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 333, AT PAGE 248, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00DOO'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 937.46 FEET, TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 150 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THEN RUN SOUTH 44D46'OO" WEST, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 653.38 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00DOO'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 653.38 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 44D46'OO" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1 ,216.39 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00DOO'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 284.08 FEET, TO THE SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 660 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE RUN NORTH 44D46'OO" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1,869.78 FEET, TO THE POíNT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 15.4846 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. File No.: CU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 Februa¡y 5. 2002 Resolution 02-032 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 C. 22 23 24 25 26 27 D. 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 '-'" ,.,., PARCEL 3: A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NE CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°00'54" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 2,567.98 FEET, TO A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 00°00'54" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH 89°59'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,320 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH 00°00'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89°59'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,320 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING AND BEING IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND CONTAINING 10.00 ACRES MORE OR LESS. (Tax ID#: 4201-131-0001-000/9,4201-134- 0001-000/8, and 4201-114-0001-000/0) (Location: West side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road.) A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part D, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. SITE PLAN Pursuant to Section 11.02.09 and Section 11.07.05(8) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Major Site Plan for the project to be known as CPV CANA, Ltd.. be, and the same is hereby, approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by 8.S.E. Consultants, Inc., dated November 6, 2001 and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Director on November 7,2001, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed structure or bUildings on this site, all exotic vegetation found on the site shall be removed. 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits for any site construction, excluding site preparation work, the developer shall construct on Range Line Road, dedicated right turn lanes. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permits the applicant shall submit an amended landscape plan which depicts an additional 178 inches of new trees along the perimeter of the site, to account for the relocated internal landscaping for this site. In lieu of providing additional perimeter plantings as required under this condition, the applicant may pay to St. Lucie County the sum of $35,200.00 to be placed Into a Forestry Restoration Fund to be administered by the County. The amount due Is to be determined based upon the number of trees (DBH) inches required to meet minimum interior File No.: GU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 February 5, 2002 Resolution 02-032 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 E. 13 14 15 F. 16 17 18 19 20 21 G. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 H. 31 32 33 34 35 36 I. 37 38 39 40 41 J. 42 43 44 45 46 47 '- ....I landscape code, multiplied by 1.5 and then multiplied by $200.00 per inch required. The condition shall not be interpreted to relieve the applicant, his successor or assign from meeting all perimeter landscape requirements. 4. This approval is contingent upon the applicant using natural gas as its primary fuel with low sulfur fuel oil as a backup supply. Such use of the backup fuel supply shall not exceed 500 hours per year per turbine. Any increase in the number of oil operating hours for state and federal air quality permits shall require St. Lucie County Board approval as a modification to the conditional use. The property on which this site plan approval is being granted is described in Part B of this Resolution. The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution are for the purpose of obtaining building permits on this property and shall expire on February 5, 2003, unless the developer has obtained a building permit for the site plan described in Part D or an extension has been granted in accordance with Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The Conditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirementthat the petitioner, CPV CANA, Ltd., including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to: the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B of this Resolution. The Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use/Site Plan approval. Should the Conditional Use/Site Plan approval granted by this Resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. The conditions set forth in Part D are an integral non-severable part of the site plan approval granted by this Resolution. If any condition set forth in Section D is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted by this resolution shall become null and void. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part D, which plan shall be placed on file with the S1. Lucie County Community. Development Director. Further, the Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of S1. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption ofthis Resolution. File No.: CU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 February 5. 2002 Resolution 02-032 Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '- After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx xxx xxx xxx XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 5th Day of February 2002. -.."I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY ATTEST: Deputy Clerk hf H :/WORD/BCC/Finished.2002lCPV.CUlCPV _ CURES.doc File No.: CU-01-007/MJSP-01-005 February 5, 2002 Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney Resolution 02-032 Page 6 , ; I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 '- ( (' " OR BOOK 1247 PAGE 1894 """'" ProhIbited RooT Materials Elements Asphalt shingles (except laminated, 320 lb., 30 year architectural grade shingles or better). Mansard roofs/canopies without roof articulation using faux gables, dormers, etc. Roofs with less than a 3 / 12 pitch (unless full parapet coverage is used). Back-lit awnings used as a mansard or canopy roof. Brightly colored glazed tile. 4. All gasoline fuel vents shall be located minimum of 75 feet from any residential structure. B. The property on which this development will take place is described as follows: The westerly 10 feet of Lot 17 and All of Lots 18, 19 & 20, Block 50, according to the plat of River Park - Unit Five, as recorded in the Plat Book 11, Page 31 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County Florida. Containing 31,241 sq ft (.717 ac) C. This site plan shall expire on August 31,2001, unless a building permit is issued or a site plan approval extension granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. All requests for site plan extension shall be accompanied by a request for a new certificate of capacity for the property and project described in this Order. D. This Order shall become effective upon the date of approval indicated below. Should the property owner, developer or authorized agent wish to appeal any condition described in Section A above, all such appeals must be filed in writing with the Community Development Director within 30 days of the rendering of this Order, as described in Section 11.02.03(8)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Should an appeal to this Order be filed, no permitting reviews or further administrative action shall take place on the processing of this development project until the appeal is resolved. E. The Certificate of Capacity, attached as Exhibit A, shall be valid for the same period as this order. If this order expires or otherwise terminates, the certificate of capacity shall automatically terminate. F. A copy of this Order shall be mailed, return receipt requested to the developer and CD-99-007 Final August 31, 1999 Page 6 ( ( ...., ~ z 0 Æ (f l- I'- 8 ---I 0 ·f N ~. 0 #' · - · W ,oþ .. CO I ~ t u C .,- ~.. 0/ 0 . 0 z u CO ~ Ï " .~& ~ 0 · ~ . 0 ::> 0 ~ .. :- a > 0 \ <:. '" 0.... 0 ... en ... "" ~ Z :J ~ 0 ü Z :J 0 OYO¥ lM1 þ'¥ Ü a: ~ , I ö: z ... I! ... ~ .. :II :; :II « "" I -"""" "" ~ z « ëi .... ... ~ s '" ! s çs ! ... ... : .. ... I .. ... "" AlNnOJ 3380HJ33>1Q '\ .. A Petition of CPV Canal D. for a Conditional Use Permit toe 'ow the electric generation plant in the U (Utilities) Zoning District. ... ration of an ; r " \ ; i i I i ¡ , , \-.1 (J) o (Q , lfl a:: lfl "0 o o a:: Q) t: :.J ,--> / / ~ Z~ThiS. pattern indicates subject parcel :~~~ t CU 01-007 Thìt~,*~~b"u--..Ip.rmg.-.d..r.r.-.:.~cri¡. 'MlII~etIolt"'bMn""'lDpl'(MdI"'mDllCII'IW'II:and~ N ~ po.IM.l.not.......... far~ _. ~t*d1g dcxunItt. Zoning ( CPV Cana, LTD. C """" i , " \ ) l i I I , \_.i AG-5 U a::: (J) u 0 0 a::: (!) AG-5 .!:: ...J IH r) / / IH WZdThiS. pattern indicates subject parcel :~=~ f CU 01-007 '"* IMP '- been ~ flIr~""" and ,....... p.rpoMI ri¡. N WhII.,.,., eftoIt'-... rre.1o pOlldit tie moetCUlNnlnl__ ~ØQIItIII,llInar.nwllIIdfllr~II·~binclnGlIocu'nerA· '-' ( CPV Cana, LTD. (_ ~ Land Use ; , '\ . \ ; r' í I I ; \.J AG-5 en 0 to , (f 0::: (f -0 0 0 0::: INO (l) c ::ï AG-5 ,_OJ / / INO CU 01-007 :~:=~ , r7ZdThiS. pattern indicates subject parcel nw fIWP'" bM-I ~ b'OIftINIIølInr*lQ Ind..-...-...- Ø'Iy. N ~-rllllarl_..... mede lD pnMdIo'" moItCl.nW'll;..d IlXAnIIIt InJønndQn ~,.. naln-lld tor...... ~1lird'I ~ ( CPV Cana, LTD. (' ..J CU 01-007 5iF.t~~~ G"I~ ? ~ Map prepared November 7. 2001 ThIIrr-..p'-t..l~b~plrnngn~~trly N ..,....-VIØart'-beln~lDpI'l:McIe..moItCU'fWl:W IlXU'IIe ~ XJMIJ6I.'. not~ lor.... _ alliglllytrdng do:Jo::lm!n ~ .?~ThiS. pattern indicates subject parcel · ' ~(>f_·~ r-. " ~$ ';"-..; '-' .."",¡ ( 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CPV proposes to construct a power generation facility in St. Lucie County using state-of-the-art combined-cycle power generation technology and air pollution control systems. The major components of the Project include a combustion turbine generator, one heat recovery stearn generator, one stearn turbine, and state-of-the-art air pollution controls. Natural gas will be used as the primary source of fuel. To enhance overall reliability, the proposed system will also be capable of burning very low sulfur-content distillate oil as backup fuel for up to an equivalent of 30 days at full load each year. 2.1 Site Description (' The CPV power generation facility will be located in southwestern St. Lucie County, Florida south of Ft. Pierce. CPV has identified a tract of land in the Cana area, bounded by SR 609 to the east and SR 709 to the west, that has been secured for the Project. The Project parcel is approximately 61 acres in size. The Project equipment will be contained within a fenced portion of the parcel with an area of approximately 29 acres. Figures 1-1 and 1-2 illustrate the proposed Project location. 2.2 Equipment Description To maxImIze efficiency and energy conservation, the proposed Project will include both combustion and stearn cycles. In the combustion cycle, the combustion turbine will fire natural gas as its primary fuel to produce approximately 170 MW. The system will also have a stearn cycle system consisting of a HRSG and stearn turbine generator. This system provides exceptional efficiency by employing the HRSG to recover otherwise lost heªt from the gas turbine exhaust and using it to create stearn and drive the stearn turbine generator to produce an additional maximum 74.9 MW. The stearn that exhausts from the stearn turbine generator is cooled and condensed for re-use in the stearn cycle. Project No. 32543-0020-00000 2-1 '-' ..., ( The combined-cycle technology design achieves an operational efficiency on a unit of energy output per unit of energy input basis greater than the operational efficiency for peaker type simple-cycle system or older power plants. Ancillary equipment for the Project will include: · One diesel-fired 250 hp fire water pump, · One 500 kW emergency generator for safe shutdown, and · One 5-cell cooling tower A description of each major Project component is provided below. 2.2.1 Combined-Cycle Combustion Turbine Generator The Project will use an advanced natural gas and distillate oil fired combustion turbine generator. The combustion turbine generator to be supplied by General Electric (GE) will be equipped with GE's two-stage, lean pre-mix dry low-nitrogen oxides (NOx) combustor. The nominal 170 MW turbine generator is GE's Model 7241 FA. Basic elements include a compressor, a dry low NOx combustor, a power turbine, and a generator. Within the combustor, injected fuel (in this case, natural gas or distillate oil) mixes with compressed air from the compressor and burns, producing hot exhaust that drives the shaft-mounted turbine blades. Some of the rotational energy ofthe shaft compresses the incoming combustion air. The greater portion of the shaft's rotational energy drives the generator to produce the nominal 170 MW. The power produced by the combustion turbine generator decreases as the ambi~nt temperature rises. This is because the density of the air decreases with increasing temperature. Because the turbine section produces power based on mass flow, increases in ambient air temperature result in a decrease in ambient air density that reduces the mass flow rate available for power generation by the turbine. In the proposed unit, power augmentation will be employed to minimize the effect of decreasing output with increasing temperature. Project No. 32543-0020-00000 2-2 \w ..."J ( During wanner ambient temperatures, the combustion turbine is power augmented to make-up electrical output that is lost due to the increasing temperatures. Power augmentation involves using steam generated in the HRSG. The steam is injected into the turbine section of the combustion turbine generator. The injected steam increases the mass flow through the turbine, thereby increasing power output. Power augmentation can only be used, however, when the ambient air temperature is above 59°F. 2.2.2 Heat Recovery Steam Generator Exhaust gases leaving the combustion turbine retain considerable recoverable heat energy. The HRSG transfers the heat from this high temperature exhaust gas (about 1,100°F) to water in order to generate useful steam for additional generating capacity. The temperature of the exhaust gas leaving the HRSG is approximately 190°F when firing natural gas. ( The major sections of the HRSG include a super heater, an evaporator, and an economizer. The HRSG will not include duct burners and it will not be supplementally fired. Other HRSG components include a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) NOx control system (with associated ammonia injection and control systems) and an exhaust stack. 2.2.3 Emission Control Equipment The exhaust flow from the combustion turbine will pass through an SCR system before venting through a 170-foot stack. This stack height has been designed to provide sufficient emission dispersion while miIÚmizing the potential for aerodynamic downwash of stack emissions, and limiting the effect upon visual aesthetics. The SCR control system will be capable of reducing NOx emissions to 2.5 (ppmvd @15% O2) when firing natural gas and 10 ppmvd @15% 02 when firing distillate oil. The ammonia slip will be limited to 5 ppmvd @ 15% O2 when firing each fuel. Project No. 32543-0020-00000 2-3 .\w ....1 ( 2.2.4 Cooling Tower A wet cooling tower will be used to cool and condense steam in the proposed combined-cycle electric generation facility. The cooling tower reduces the temperature of cooling water by air- water contact. The Facility will include a condenser and a five-cell mechanical draft cooling tower to cool the steam/water from the HRSG. Water from the cooler side of the condenser flows down through each cooling tower cell while air flows upward. Some of the cooling water evaporates and exits with the air as water vapor. The surface area of the water is increased as it flows or trickles through the fill section, which optimizes the heat transfer capability prior to it being collected in a basin at the bottom of the tower. Airflow, induced through the tower by fans, passes upward through the fill section, where heat transfers from the water and a fraction of the water evaporates, thus cooling the remaining water. The cooled water, which is collected in the basin, is then re-circulated back to the condenser. All of this occurs in a continuous fashion. A smaIl percentage of the water is trapped in the air as small droplets. These entrained water droplets are referred to as cooling tower drift. Most of the water trapped in the air is removed using high-efficiency drift eliminators. However, some droplets remain airborne and are released with the plume exiting the tower. The water that is lost through the tower to the atmosphere must be replaced. In addition, as water is evaporated from the system, the dissolved solids concentration of the water remaining in < circulation increases. To prevent dissolved solids from reaching levels where they would collect as scale on the exposed surfaces of the tower and condenser, some of the basin water is continuously bled off from the system. This is known as cooling tower blowdown. As with the evaporative losses, this blowdown must be replaced. The flow required to compensate for evaporative and drift losses and blowdown are known as cooling tower makeup. . Air quality impacts are expected from the mechanical draft cooling tower system due to the dissolved solids contained in the cooling tower drift, even when high efficiency drift eliminators are employed to limit the quantity of droplets in the plume. The cooling tower will be designed to achieve a drift rate of 0.0005 percent of the circulating water flow rate, which represents the Project No. 32543-0020-00000 2-4 '-' """'" (' state-of-the-art in drift elimination technology. Some of the solids (particulate matter) are less than 10 microns in size and constitute PMIO emissions. These cooling tower emissions will be in addition to combustion emissions associated with the proposed Project stack. 2.2.5 Proposed Fuel Use The equipment will be designed to generate electricity and steam using natural gas as the primary fuel source. During periods of natural gas interruption or when market conditions warrant, very low sulfur (0.05 percent) distillate oil will be used. The annual quantity of distillate oil use is limited to the equivalent of 100 percent load operation for no more than 30 days, i.e., 720 hours. The distillate oil will be delivered to the site by truck, and stored in an above ground tanle 2.3 Project Physical Layout and Design ( The new equipment associated with the Project will occupy an approximate 29-acre area footprint on the approximately 61-acre site. A site plan illustrating the Facility arrangement is contained in Appendix B. Power Generation Equipment: The electrical generating equipment, including the gas turbine, steam turbine, HRSG and associated mechanical and electrical equipment will be located outdoors. Support Buildings: There will be several small ancillary buildings as shown on the site plan in Appendix B, including a combination administration/warehouse building, a combination electric room/control room, a cooling tower electric building, water treatment area, pump house, and a Reverse Osmosis water plant building (R.O. plant). Security: All operational areas of the site will be enclosed by a security fence. The electrical switchyard and the gas metering area will each be separately fenced. There will be one main gated plant entrance on the east side off of Range Line Road. Project No. 32543-002o-00ooo 2-5 ~ ,...I ( . Storage Tanks: Several storage tanks will be constructed, all of which will be above ground and will meet all applicable Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) standards. One distillate oil storage tank with a capacity of 975,000 gallons will be installed. The tank will have double-wall construction with leak detection. Three water storage tanks will also be constructed: one 1.48 million gallon de-mineralized water tank, one 0.54 million gallon raw firewater storage tank and one deep well storage tank. A 12,000-gallon aqueous ammonia storage tank will be constructed for the nitrogen oxide emission control system. A concrete containment dike will be built around this tank. Finally, a 20,000-gallon neutralizer tank will be installed. 2.4 Equipment Operation The proposed design consists of a combined-cycle power generating unit based on a single GE PG7241 (FA) combustion turbine, a 3-pressure heat recovery steam generator and a steam turbine generator (STG) designed in conjunction with the HRSG. The STG output will be limited to less than 75 MW. Control of STG output will be monitored and controlled via an automatic digital control system (DCS) to ensure the 75 MW output limit is not exceeded. A number of control options have been investigated and the most probable are described below. When ambient temperature is at 59 degrees Fahrenheit COF) or greater, excess steam generated in the HRSG can be extracted from the HRSG, bypassing the steam turbine, and injected into the CT. This mode of operation is referred to as power augmentation. Since there is a limit on the quantity of steam that may be injected into the CT, it may be necessary to further reduce steam flow to the STG to limit output or to reduce steam turbine output by other means. Bypass of a portion of the heat exchange surface in the HRSG can be an effective method of reducing steam production by reducing the heat recovered from the combustion rnrbine flue gas. The proposed design will make use of a low temperature economizer bypass to limit steam production by allowing more of the heat generated by the combustion turbine to be discharged to the atmosphere with the flue gas. This will limit STG output. Project No. 32543-0020-00000 2-6 '-' ....I ( In many cases, application of both of these control modes will reduce steam output of the turbine to the required quantity. If additional reduction in STG output is required, raising the STG discharge pressure by raising the condenser operating temperature will reduce turbine efficiency, reducing electrical output. Output of the STG may be tuned to the desired value by turning cooling tower cells on and off as necessary. When the ambient temperature falls below 59 OF, the manufacturer does not recommend injection of steam into the combustion turbine. If the low temperature economizer bypass, combined with an increase in cooling water temperature does not reduce STG output sufficiently, excess steam may bypass the steam turbine and be sent directly to the condenser. Output of the STG will be controlled automatically utilizing the methods described above through a DCS designed to ensure that the electrical power produced from steam does not exceed 74.9 MW. The DCS will be programmed by the Engineering Procurement Construction (EPe) engineer to limit the steam turbine output to 74.9 MW. The necessary logic to automatically (' control steam injection to the gas turbine, cooling tower fan speed, HRSG economizer bypass control, steam bypass control, or reduce gas turbine load will be incorporated in the DCS. The plant operator can manually lower the steam turbine output value but cannot raise the number beyond the programmed set point limit or alter the DCS logic. Depending on the DCS platform purchased, the logic and set point will either be protected by password or keylock. If the logic or set point must be changed after the plant is in commercial operation, only an authorized DCS representative or a qualified DCS engineer can make the modifications. These modifications can be made using the DCS engineering work station, which will be located in the plant control room. A shutdown of the facility is not required since the changes can be made while the plant is on-line. 2.5 Construction Schedule The development schedule for the Project calls for obtaining all required pre-construction approvals by the first quarter of 2002. Upon financial closing, groundbreaking for the Facility would be initiated by the EPC contractor. Construction of the Project would require Project No. 32543-0020-00000 2-7 '-' ....I ( approximately 22 to 24 months and is scheduled to be completed in the first quarter of 2004. Start-up/testing activities would be ongoing during the later phases of construction. Commercial acceptance of the Facility by CPV would occur approximately six weeks after completion of the construction activities. Project No. 32543-0020-00000 2-8 '-' .....I (: 3.0 APPLICABLE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS The proposed CPV Project must comply with air pollution control regulations administered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Division of Air Resources Management (DARM). Essential to understanding the regulatory requirements to which the Project must comply are the new power generation equipment air pollutant emission rates. The Project will produce approximately 245 MW of electrical power. The Project's primary power generation equipment includes a new combustion turbine, HRSG, and steam turbine, operated as a combined-cycle system. Major pollutants of interest emitted include: sulfur dioxide (SÜ:!), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter less than 10 microns (PMJO), carbon monoxide (CO), and volatile organic compounds (VOC). Other pollutants including lead and regulated non-criteria air contaminants are not of concern because the new power generation equipment will fire natural gas as the primary fuel and very low-sulfur distillate oil (0.05 percent sulfur content) as the back-up fuel. The distillate oil firing will be limited to the equivalent of 3D-day operation at 100 percent load. The annual emission rates that determine regulatory applicability are the potential annual emissions of the new power generation equipment. Design data provided by the equipment manufacturer for the new power generation equipment specifies air pollutant emissions as a function of operating load and ambient temperature for both natural gas and distillate oil firing (see Appendix C). The annual potential emissions were calculated assuming 335 days of natural gas firing and 30 days of low sulfur distillate oil firing, and assuming the maximum pollutant emission rate over the range of operating conditions contained in the equipment design data. Table 3-1 shows the new power generation equipment's potential annual emissiori's. Project No. 32543-0020-00000 3-1 '-' .-J ( Table 3-1 New Power Generation Equipment Criteria Pollutant Emissions CPV Canal Pollutant Potential Emissionsl . (TonslYear) NOx 96 S02 76 CO 226 PMlPMlOj 96 VOC 15 I Source: GE performance data in Appendix C. 2 Annual emission estimates based On combustion turbine operating 8760 hours at maximum hourly emission rate. 3 PMlPMIO value includes combustion turbines and cooling tower drift. The U.s. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations establish air quality standards and air contaminant emission limits with which all new sources must comply. These regulations affect the design and operation of the new power generation equipment. This section describes the regulations and their impact on the Project. 3.1 Ambient Air Quality Standards EP A has developed National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six pollutants, referred to as criteria pollutants, for the protection of the public health and welfare. The criteria pollutants are S02, N02, CO, PM1o, ozone (03), and lead (Pb). FDEP enforces the NAAQS as state air quality standards. PDEP has also established primary S02 State Ambient Air Quality Standards (SAAQS), which are more restrictive than the NAAQS. Table 3-2 shows the NAAQS and SAAQS. Primary standards protect human health with an adequate margin of safety, _ and secondary standards protect public welfare (e.g., avoid damage to property or vegetation). Different averaging periods are established for the criteria pollutants based on their potential environmental effects. Project No. 32543-0020-00000 3-2 '-' ~ ( Attaining and maintaining compliance with the state and national ambient air quality standards is the primary goal of all air regulations evolving from the original Clean Air Act and its subsequently enacted amendments. All areas of the nation have been classified as to their status with regard to attaining the standards. The Project site area is classified as "unclassified" or "attainment" for all criteria pollutants. Table 3-2 Ambient Air Quality Standards and Thresholds Averaging NAAQS (µglm3)h PSD Significant Pollutant Increments Impact Levels Period Primary Secondary (µglm3) (µglm3) 3-hour NA 1300a 5l2a 25 Sulfur Dioxide (S02) 24-hour 365a (260) NA 91a 5 Annual 80g (60) NA 20g I . Nitrogen Dioxide (N02) Annual 100g 1O()ll 25g 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) I-houra 40,000 NA NA 2000 8-houra 10,000 NA NA 500 Particulate Matter (pMJO) 24-hour 150d NA 30a 5 Annual 50g NA 17g 1 Particulate Matter (PM2.s) 24-hour 65f NA NA NA Annual lSeg NA NA NA Ozone (03) I-hour 23Sb 23Sb NA NA 8-hour 157c IS7c NA NA Lead (Pb) . Quarterly 1.5& NA NA NA a Not to be exceeded more than once per year. b Not to be exceeded more than once per year on average. c 3-year average of annual 4th highest concentration. d The pre-existing form is exceedance-based. The revised form is the 99th percentile. e Spatially averaged over designated monitors. fThe form is the 98111 percentile. g Never to be exceeded. h µg!m3, micrograms per cubic meter. . ( ) SAAQS Concentration. Project} o.32543~20~ 3-3 '- --I ( It is important to note that implementation of some proposed NAAQS, the PM2.5 standards, and the 8-hour ozone standard have been delayed. The delay is due to recent court decisions and the need to develop additional ambient air quality data and compliance assessment procedures. 3.2 Non-attainment New Source Review Because S1. Lucie County is currently designated as "unclassifiable" or "attainment" for all criteria pollutants, the Project is not subject to non-attainment new source review. 3.3 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) The federal PSD regulations affect areas classified as "unclassifiable" or "attainment" with respect to the NAAQS. S1. Lucie County is classified as such for all criteria pollutants. As part of an ambient air quality impact analysis, a facility classified as a new major source or major modification must demonstrate compliance with the NAAQS, and with the PSD increments shown in Table 3-2. The PSD regulations require assessments of potential impacts to soils and vegetation and to growth and visibility in the area surrounding the proposed plant. Additionally, facilities within 100 kilometers (km) of a Class I (wilderness) area must also perform an assessment of potential impacts to Class I area(s). The Class I area closest to the Project is the Everglades National Park. This Class I area is located approximately 180 km from the Facility site, and therefore is beyond the distance for which an impact analysis is required under the PSD Rules. When advised of the proposed Facility emissions rates and distance from the Class I area, the National Park Service confirmed to DEP that an impact analysis is not required. A new major source in "unclassifiable" or "attainment" areas that will result in net emissions increases greater than the significant emissions increase levels presented in Table 3-3 is subject to PSD review. Other pollutants for which EP A promulgated annual emission thresholds are not listed because the new equipment will bum natural gas as the primary fuel producing negligible Project No. 32543-OO20.(J()()()() 3-4 '- "'" ( emissions of these pollutants. The annual emission thresholds shown in Table 3-3 are exceeded for NOx, SOz, CO, and PMlPMIO. Accordingly, the proposed project's new power generation equipment is subject to PSD permitting requirements for these air pollutants. Table 3-3 PSD Significant Emissions Increase Level and CPV Cana Project Net Emission Rates (Pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21 (b) (23) (i» Pollutant Significant Emissions Increase Level Annual Net Emissions Increases (TPY) (TPY) NOx 40 96 SOz 40 76 CO 100 226 PM 25 96 PMIO 15 96 VOC 40 15 3.4 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Combustion Turbine The new combustion turbine associated with the Project is subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart GG (New Source Performance Standards for Combustion Turbines). NSPS Subpart GG affects combustion turbines having a maximum firing capacity greater than 10 million Btu per hour and constructed after October 1977. The emission standards contained in the NSPS rule, limit flue gas concentration~ of NO x and SOz. The NOx limit is 75 parts per million (ppm) (based on the turbine heat rate and the fuel bound nitrogen). The SOz limit is 150 ppm (or 0.8 percent sulfur in fuel). Additionally, the provisions of this subpart require the installation of a Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) to monitor fuel consumption and water to fuel ratio. Subpart GG also requires monitoring of fuel sulfur and nitrogen content and allows for the development of a custom schedule to monitor these parameters. Project No. 3Z543-OOZ~OOO 3-5 '-' """" The new power generation equipment will combust natural gas and 0.05 percent sulfur content distillate oil. The proposed fuels contain less than 0.8 percent sulfur, complying with the NSPS requirements for S02. The combined-cycle combustion turbine will generate no more than 9 ppm of NOx prior to the addition of SCR controls and no more than 2.5 ppmvd@15% O2 after the SCR controls when firing natural gas. Backup distillate firing will generate no more than 10 ppmvd@15% O2 of NOx. Therefore, the combustion turbine will comply with the requirements ofNSPS Subpart GG for NOx. Fuel Oil Storage Tank The Facility plans to install and operate a 975,000 gallon above ground fuel oil storage tank. Due to its size, this tank is subject to the provisions of 40 CFR 60, Subpart Kb, Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels for which Construction Commenced after July 23, I984. Specifically, this Subpart requires record keeping as stated in Section 60.116b, which includes the dimensions of the tank, and an analysis showing the capacity of the vessel. 3.5 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants New stationary combustion turbines are subject to 40 CPR Part 63, Subpart B - Requirements for the Control Technology Determinations for Major Sources in Accordance with Clean Air Act Sections 112(g) and 1120). This regulation requires a case-by-case determination of the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) for major sources that exceed the aIlllUal emission thresholds of 10 tons per year for an individual Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) or 25 tons per year for total HAP emissions. Because the Project is using clean fuels (natural gas and distillate oil), total Project HAP emissions do not exceed the regulatory thresholds. Emission calculations for HAPs are provided in Appendix C and are based on AP-42 emission factors, Fifth Edition, April 2000 for all HAPs. Project No. 32543-0020-00000 3-6 '-" ,..,,¿ ( Total Project emissions of each HAP are less than 10 tons per year and less than 25 total tons; therefore, the Project is not subject to this regulation. 3.6 Acid Rain Program Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments required EP A to establish a program to reduce emissions of acid rain-forming pollutants, called the Acid Rain Program. The overall goal of the Acid Rain Program is to achieve significant environmental benefits through reductions in S02 and NOx emissions. To achieve this goal, the program employs both traditional and market- based approaches for controlling air pollution. Under the federal program, EP A allocates existing units S02 allowances. The affected facilities may use their allowances to cover emissions, or may trade their allowances to other units under a market-trading program. In addition, subject facilities are required to implement continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) for affected units. The CEMS requirements of the Acid Rain Program include: an S02 concentration monitor; a NOx concentration monitor; a volumetric flow monitor; an opacity monitor; a diluent gas (02 or CO2) monitor; and a computer-based data acquisition and handling system for recording and performing calculations. Begim1Íng in 2000, the Federal Acid Rain Program's annual emission limitations became effective. The new combustion turbine will not be given an annual emissions budget under the Federal Acid Rain Program. The new combustion turbine will obtain S02 allowances through the market-trading program. The new power generation equipment incorporates the appropriate CEMS equipment in its design. 3.7 Operating Permit The CPV Facility is subject to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) Title V operating permit program. The Florida DARM regulations implementing the CAA Title V program are contained in Rule 62-213. The operating permit specifies the applicable regulatory requirements with Project No. 32543-0020-00000 3-7 ,,-,. "WI ( which the CPV Facility must comply and the methods used to demonstrate compliance. CPV will comply with the rule requirements as necessary. 3.8 Risk Management Plan (RMP) In the case of a new facility, compliance with the RMP rule requires that the plan be submitted before the regulated substance is present at the facility in a quantity above the applicable regulatory threshold. Because the SCR control technology proposed for the Project will utilize aqueous ammonia with a concentration of less than 20 percent and because no other regulated substances will be present in a quantity above an applicable threshold, an RMP will not be required for the Project. 3.9 Florida Air Permit Application { The purpose of the new source permitting process is to ensure that a proposed facility will be in compliance with all applicable federal and state regulatory requirements. The Project requires the submittal of an Air Permit Application under the Florida permitting rules. Based on the regulatory applicability review presented in the previous sections, the application for the new power generation equipment is expected to include the following analyses: . Air quality modeling study demonstrating compliance with state and federal ambient air quality standards and increments; and . Federal PSD review for S02, NOx, PMJPMIO, and CO. The Application is submitted to DARM for review and approval. The initial step in the agency review of the application is a completeness determination. Once the application is deemed complete, DARM conducts its review and issues a proposed permit for public review. A public hearing may be held and any comments addressed before issuing final approval. Project No. 32543-0020-00000 3-8 v '-' "" CPV Cana, Ltd. Power Project Construction and Operation Noise Impact Assessment St. Lucie County, Florida Prepared for CPV Cana, Ltd. Prepared by The Louis Berger Group, Inc. 811 South Orlando Avenue, Suite E Winter Park, FI 32789 and Acentech, Inc. 33 Moulton Street Cambridge, MA 02138 September, 2001 Î-~'\ í n : (J : L I ]i" I :š., -;~ì ¡ SEP 2 B 2001 r ~ 0_ I L.,; '-' Table of Contents Introduction Baseline Noise Data Collection Plant Sound Attenuation Plant Operating Sound Estimates Noise Control Ordinance """ 1 1 2 4 6 CPV-Cana, Ltd~ September 200 I ...",,¡ Introduction CPV Cana, Ltd., (CPV Cana) proposes to construct and operate a 250 Mwe combined cycle power plant on a 60-acre site in central St. Lucie County, Florida. The site is located in an industrial area southwest of the intersection of Range Line Road and Glades Cut-off Road. Acentech developed an initial set of plant noise estimates based on current project information. These estimates were made in order to identify the property line and off-site sound levels with associated noise control treatments for comparisons with the local noise regulations. This report demonstrates CPV Cana's ability to meet the St. Lucie County noise control regulations. St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 1-13.8 NOISE CONTROL. Baseline Noise Data Collection, St. Lucie County, Florida The Louis Berger Group, Inc, conducted a noise measurement study during the period of July 24, 25 and 26, 200 I with the purpose of investigating existing noise levels at and adjacent to a proposed power plant development site in Cana of St. Lucie County, Florida. Competitive Power Ventures, Inc. has proposed to locate the project between Glades Cut-Off Road (Route 709) and Range Line Road (Route 609), southwest of the intersection of the two roadways. The methodology and measurement results are documented as follows: The noise levels used in this study are Leq, Ldn, and Lso. Leq is the equivalent of a continuous sound level, which, in a stated time period and at a stated location, has the same A-weighted sound energy as the time-varying sound. Ldn is the average noise level over an entire 24-hour period with a penalty of 10 dBA at nighttime. Lso is the A-weighted sound level exceeded 50 percent of the time of the measurement period. Brnel and Kjaer 2236 and 2260 Precision Sound Level Meters (SLM) were used in field measurements. The SLMs meet or exceed the requirements set forth in ANSI S 1.4-1983 Standards for Type I quality and accuracy. Acoustical calibrators (Brnel and Kjaer 4231) were used to calibrate the noise equipment for each measurement period. The SLMs were operated on the A- weighting network and faster meter response. Measurements were not collected if the roadway pavement was wet, or if wind speed exceeded 10 miles per hour. Porous windscreens were used on the SLM during all measurement periods. All of the measurements were taken at ground level. For these measurements, the SLMs were mounted approximately five feet above the ground's surface. This height is generally considered representative of people's ear level. Wherever possible, measurement sites were located in open areas away from buildings or other potentially reflective surfaces. Noise levels were measured at six selected locations (see Figure I) in the nearby industrial areas and further afield residential areas for a possible power plant development site near the intersection of Glades Cut-Off Road (Route 709) and Range Line Road, (Route 609) in St. Lucie County, Florida. The predominant land uses adjacent to the project area include industrial and agricultural. and to a lesser degree, low-density residential and commercial. Noise levels were measured for short duration at peak traffic, mid-day and late night hours. All the noise measurement locations were selected to collect existing ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project site. Noise CPV -Cana, Lt~ September 200 I ....I measurement locations are presented on Figure I. Most common existing ambient noise sources included birds and traffic during the day and bullfrogs/insects during the evening and night. Noise levels at each location were presented in Table I and described as follows: TABLE 1 NOISE MEASUREMENT RESULTS July 24-26, 2001 Noise Description Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Non- Leq Night L50 Night Measurement (dBA) Peak Hour (dBA) (dBA) Location (between 7:00 (dBA) (between 10:00 (between 10:00 and 8:30 a.m. or (between 8:30 p.m. and 7 a.m.) p.m. and 7:00 4:30 and 6:30 a.m. and 4:30 a.m.) p.m.) p.m. or 6:30 p.m. and 9:30 p.m.) Industrial Area, Southeast 51 51 64 64 of Facility Industrial Area, Northeast 2 of Facility (at property 60 58 49 47 line) 3 Commercial Area, North 53 53 53 43 of Facility 4 Industrial Area, West of 52 49 49 44 Facility 5 Residential Area, 51 55 55 46 Southwest of Facility 6 Residential Area, South 58 50 50 55 of the Facility Power Plant Sound Attenuation Sound associated with operation of the project will be produced by the gas turbine inlet, casing, and outlet; the inlet duct, side walls, and exhaust of the heat recovery generator; the casing.ofthe steam turbine and electric generator; the mechanical-draft cooling tower; the side walls and coolers for the main power transformers; and auxiliary motors, pumps, fans, compressors, and valves. Project equipment will operate essentially continuously and produce a steady sound 24-hours per day and seven days per week. Abatement methods to be employed to control the sound associated with the operation of the project include: CPV -Can a, Ltd.'-' September 200 I """" · High efficiency, parallel-baffle mufflers and filters will be installed in the gas turbine inlet, as necessary to abate sound from the gas turbine inlet compressor stages. · The gas turbine will include insulated-metal enclosures, as necessary to contain sound. · The sound produced by the gas turbine exhaust will be attenuated by the heat recovery steam generator. · The steam turbine and electric generator will be provided with metal enclosures that attenuate sound radiation. · The heat recovery steam turbine will include exhaust mufflers as necessary in the stack. · The main power transfonners will include high-efficiency core designs resulting in reduced sound generation. · Auxiliary equipment, such as boiler feed pumps will have noise specifications, enclosures, and/or local barrier walls. · The five-cell mechanical draft wet cooling tower will include noise specifications for fans and water splash control and/or local barrier walls as necessary. · Circulating water pumps and motors will include noise specifications for low noise design or enclosures as necessary. · Fuel-gas metering and compressors will be specified for low noise emissions or enclosed as necessary. · Steam vents that may operate on an extended basis will include mufflers. CPV-Cana, Ltd~ September 200 I ""-' Plant Operating Sound Estimates The following plant noise estimates are based on vendor-supplied and in-house source information employing an industry standard modeling program (CADNA) and supplemental spreadsheet calculations. These estimates are given below for the current base design with noise control treatments, and are compared to local area and local property line noise limits. Figure I presents an aerial view that shows the site layout and the community and property line locations. Sound Level Estimates at Community and Property Line Locations (Current Base Design) Plant Sound Level Location (dBA) 1 - Southeast of Facili 53 65 2 - Northeast of Facili line) 56 65 3 - North of Facili 43 60 4 - West of Facili 49 60 5 - Southwest of Facili 35 55 6 - South of Facili 25 55 7 - Just North of Facili 65 65 8 - Just East of Facili 65 65 9 - Just South ofFacili 65 65 10 - Northwest of Facili 56 60 . Various noise suppression devices are being modeled to determine which devices may result in dBA reduction. Staff will be informed/furnished with a revised table as it is available. '-' CPV-Cana, Ltd. September 200 I ...., Figure 1. View of Plant Site and Community and Property Line Locations B iii Fj 8 B ¡g Fl 8 I'! ¡; ., B III ëi ., ~ ~ Figw-e 1. CPV CANA Project Noire MJdeling Locations Septembe¡; 2001 CPV -Cana, Ltd.'-' September 200 I ....,¡ Noise Control Ordinance Noise requirements presented below are excerpted from the St. Lucie County Noise Ordinance. St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 1-13.8 Noise Control Sec. 1-13.8-18. Maximum permissible sound levels by use district. Measurement period one-quarter hour (continuous), as measured at the property boundary of the receiving parcel. Sound Level in Decibels A-Scale (dBA) Use Day Night Classification 0700--2200 2200--0700 LI L/O L50 LI L/O L50 Residential 70 65 60 65 60 55 Commercial 75 70 65 70 65 60 Industrial 75 70 65 75 70 65 '-' ....", AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5,2002 7:00 P.M. CPV CANA, LTD., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of an electric power generation plant in the U (Utilities) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: West side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuo.ls testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners January 21, 2002. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on January 23, 2002. File No. CU-01-007 '-' Sf- lUCll; COUNTY IOAlO Of COMN.ISSION£tS ~Ill( HEAtCNG AGENO.... ~S; 2002 TO'WHOM.ITMAY~ NOncE""'-by~In~"'s.ct4on 11.00.03 fA.. St. luch CooInty I.-f ~ Cod. c..d....~_...St.t.uc:kCounly~ ~~~d~~......:f~:l 1owiN;J -.-m: 1 1_ CPV C,o,t-l.... lTD for c c~ In lonlnv f.-",", ..... 1Hi l'nóvmi<>\. Hea"l'l and U (Ul;liticsIZonI"lJ o;,"ktll0 m. U I IUl¡lih...Jloning Oi,"iCl for the 10110"';"9 d....,,,b.o:d property, ¡>orc~ I: CO/lM'lENCE A,T H~£ NOprHIA~' CORNU Of SECrtON 1. roWN"HlP 3' SOUTH, R....NGE 38 EAST, sr, lOCIE COUNTY. flOIl:IO,," THENC£ RUNS SOO·OO·S4·W AlONG THE EAST UHE Of SECTION 1. A. DISTANCE Of 2'97.98 fur, TO THE POINT Of IIEGINNING; THENCE RUN SOO"OO''i4''w, AlONG THE EAST liNE OF SECTION 1. A DISTA,NCE OF 342.83 FEET; THENCE rUN N89°S9'Oô"W A DISTANCE Of 660 FEET; THENCE ION sooW'S4*'w. A OISTANCf Of 330.00 fEET, THENCE Rt./N N89"WOÓ....,..,. A mSTAI"«:E Of¡ \976.38 fEET- fHENCE tUN N...·.6·00~ AlONG THE EAST UNf Qf A Fl~10"'" POWEll AND UGHT E.....,E.: M£NT A DISTANCE Of 1869.18 fEfT; THENCE tUN soo"OÓ·~-W. II DtSTAHCf Of 635.03 FEET; THENCE tUN 589*59"06-£, A DISTANCE Of 1320_00 fEEl TO THE I'OlHI Of afGlNN1NG; ALllYlNG Þ.NO aEING IN SECTION 1. TO'NNSHIP 31 SOUTH,. RANGE: 311 ['¡'ST. ST_ WOE COUNTY, flotlOA.. AND CONTAIN ING 36.06 ACRES MORE OlLESS. Porcel2.0 A f'AKR Of lAND ,IN SECllON 1. TOWNSHIP 37 SOVTH. tANGE 38 EAST, ST lUOE COUNTY. flORID"", '.iÞdD PARCEllS DESCIIIfD AS FOllOWS. I CQMMfNCE AT THE NOITHEASr QCINEI: Of SECrlON 1 THENCE RUN soo-oo'$4W. J\l.0HG THE &.ST UN ÓF SfCTlON 1, A DISTANCE Of 7IJ9798 fEET. THENC iM'4 NB9'"S9'06aw. ;.. OlSTANCE Of 1320.00 fEET THENCf tUN NQIT'OO"$4"E., A DISTANCE Of 635.0 FEET. TO M $OI..IDŒASTEIlY' lJ'.Œ Of THE ~ fOO 1 WIDE Fl.OISOA POWEl AND UOHT CQNIJ.HY ~. MENT. AS DE$CIIIED IN 0fflCW. -.1fCQtD$ leX) ( 333. A.T PAGE 241. Of THE PI.III.IC'I£COII)$ Of ST. LVOECOUH1'Y. flOl'lDA", AND THE POINT. OF ~ """'.....,... ¡ THfNŒ CONTlNIJEtfOCl-oo'Sn. A OCSTANCE Of' 931.46 ÆfT. TO THI!!- NOI1HW!S1ØlY UHf Of SAfD EASEMENT. SA.lO lINE AlSO I6NG THf-SOUTHfAST- EILY' UNE OF THE 150 fOOT WIDe f\.OCfOA EAST COAST IAlLROAD ItGHT;.of,WAT THEN -IUN SU·46œ-w. ......0l"0IG SAID IIGHT-Of..W;..Y' LINE. A DlSTAHa Of 65138 .Rf1': THØ«:E lUN SOCI"OO'S4*W. A DISTANCE Of '$3.31 fEET, THENCE IUN ~~'OQ"'W. ' OISTAHa Of -1214.39 FEET: mtNŒ IUN,SO<r'OITS4~, A DISTANCE Of 2kQI ÆET. TO THE:.$AID SOIJ1'HfASTEILr LINE Of tHI! 6&G fOOT WIDE f\.OItDIl.PowB AND tIGHT CQlRAN'f EASE- MENT¡ THEHCE- tUt.t ~,,"-oa-w. ALONG SAIO SOUTHfASTtllY UNE. A DISTANCE Of 116'.71 ff£T. TO THE POINT Of IEGINNING. THE AIOYE 'OfSClfIED ,AICÊl CONTAINS IS..4I46 "'an. MOlE 0IlfS$,. hItoIl~ . \ A. PMCa OF lANO .... SKI10N t, TOWNSH1P '37 ; SOUTH.IANGf 38 fAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FlOIIDA. SAID PA.lCB.1S DfSCIII8) AS fOll.OWSo. c=:=:, ~~ ~=~~wJ i COUNTY, fLOI)OA" THENa IUN socroo'S""W ALONG THE fAST UHf Of SAID SK1'1ON I. A Ol$- i ~Of~~~~i LINE. OF _ SAID SfCTION t A OCSTAI'q OF 330.00 ! fffT, Tl«NCE RUN ~"W A -OISTANa OF I 1320 fEfT. THENÇ! ~ NW'OO:Jn: ADtST.I.NCE Of m.oo fEEl. nENCE Slrast'06'"£ A. DlSJAHCf Of 1320 fEET TO THf: POINT Of IfGINHINQ. ALL L YlNG AND IEIHO ... SECI10tf 1. TO'NN$HIP··37 SOU'Tl\ lA.NGf 31 fAST, ST. LUCIE ~.- J:l0lK>A. AND CONTAINING 10.00 ACUS MOlE OR LESS. l~W_·tldiiclIal9L1NIoad.~O.60 ...ov.h d Gladn 0...0« load. ";':~~~r' \~~~mI1~",O~~ (VIiliMto'l ZOf,,j.;<;1 lOt .... lalla...l<>Q deou,bed p<~ ,..", 'oral I: . ~ A.T THE NQRTHfA$f èOlNfl: Of SECTiON 1 TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH. lA.NGf 38 EAST. ST. lUOf ~~TYiH:l::~Hr-~~~S l.~~;~ Of 2t9'." FEET. TO THE POINT 0# BEGl~NING¡ tHENCE RUN soo-oo'S<I"W. AlONG THE fAST lINf Of SECT1QN 1. A DISTANCE Of 36'.i1..t3 fEU; THtNCE fUN N89·SV04"Y1, A DISYoIr.NCE Of 660 fEfTl THENCE tUN SOO"OO·S."W. A OIStANŒ Of 330,(1) fEeT- THENCE Il:UÑ NlI9"S'oI·Oó"W. A DIStANCE Of 1976.38 FHT; THENCE IIUN NHo4ó·00'E. ALONG TIlE EASI LINE Of A HQI/IOA POWHl AND liGHT EASE· MENf A Ol'.ir.4.NG Of 186918 fEET; THENCE WN soo"oCrs~"W. ,., DISTANCE Of 6:35,03 fEET; THENCE &UN S89""í9·06·~. ^ OIST^NCE OF lJ20_00 fEET TO rl1E POINT OF 8EGINN1NG; AIL lYING AND 8EING IN SECTION I, TOWNSHIP l7 SOUTH. RANGE JlI E,t.sr ST LUCIE COUNTY, HOI/IDA. AND CONTAIN ING 30_0b ....0[') MO~E Ql/lESS "OIc~'2 A ,,,,RCEl Of LAND IN SECTION 1. TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH. RANGE 3S EAST, ST, LUCIE COUNTY. fLORIDA. 51',10 PARCH IS 0£SOI8£O....5 fOllOWS COMMENCE AT THE NOll:THEAST OCRNUI Of SKIION 1. TtlENCE ruN SOOoOO·S.W. ALONG IHE EAST LINE OF SECTION I, A DISIANCe OF ~897,98 FEET; THENCE RUN N89"59"06"W', .... DISTANCE Of 1320.00 fEET: THENŒ RUN NOO·OO·$4·£. A DISTANCE Of 635.03 FEET TO THE SOUH-tEASTULY LINE Of THE 660 fOOT WIDE- HORIOA I'QWfl/ AND LIGHT COMPANY EASE- MENT, AS DESCll8ED IN OFfICiAl Il:ECOIl:OS SOOK: 333. AT PAGE 248. Of THE f'llBlIC RECO«PS OF Sf. LUCI[ COUNTY. HOI/IOA, AND THE POINT OF L ðEGINNING: THENCe CONIINUE 1'(00"OO'54'e. A. DISTANCE Of 93],46 fEET. TO THE NOlTHW£STElllY UNE OF $A.lO EASEMENT. SAID LINE Al.SO .elNG THE SOUTI-ŒA.ST· EIl:L Y UNE Of fHE T so FOOT WIDE flOf!IDA EASt COAS( RoI.IUOAD IllGHT·Of·WAY; THEN I/UN s.«"<I6'OO"'W. AtONG SAID RIGHT-Of·WAY liNE. A DISTANCE OF 653.38 FEeT; THENCE RUN SooeOO"S4aw, A DISTANCE Of 653.38 fffT; ll-lENCE IlUN S«".46'01:rW..A DISTANCE OF 1216.39 feET; rtlENCE l1JN SOO"OO"s......,. A. OISTANCE OF 2M.08 FEET. TO THf: SAlD SQUTHfASTEllY UNE Of ll-lE 660 FOOT WIDE flQlIO,," I'OWfI AND JC¡HT CON#A.NY EASEMENT. TH!HCE IUN N4.4".&6"QO"W. -'LONG SAlo I SOl/THEASTÐly _UNf.. A DISTANCE OF 1869.18 FEET, TO THe POINT OF IEGfNMNG. THE "-BOVf DfSCtlIfO PAlCfL CONTAINS 1 S.A8A6 AClES. MOlE OlLfSS. ......~ A PAIŒ\. Ofl»<lD IN SECflON _I, TOWNSHIP 37 SOlJTH.·1ANGE 38 fAST. ST_ LUCIe COIJt.'(TY, flOllDA. S"'IO'~ISOE$CII~AS~ . cOMMENCE AT THE WE cotNfI· Of _SECnON í'. TOWNSHIP 31 _SOUTH. IJr.NŒ 38 fAST. ST. LUQf ~TTnJL~~~~~~1"~ TANCE Of 2561.98 ffET. TO·A fIIOtNTOf IEQINNlNG, THENCf <ClHTlt4lJf -SOCrOO'$o&"W ......ONG Tl1f fASt, tiNE Of SAID Sf010N I. A.OIS1ANCE-Of 330.00 fEET' JHENC£ IUN t'4W5"WW A OlSrANCf -Of. 132Ó fEfT. tHfNCE RUN NOlJ-oO'S4"'EA OISTANCEOf 330-00fffT. THfNCE sa'-W06"E A otSTANCE Of 1320 fEET TO THE POtNT Of IfG{NNINC. ALllVIHG AND RING IN SfC110N 1. TOWHSHtf 37 SOUTH. IANGE J8 fAST. ST. WOE COUNTY; A.OtIDA. o\NO CONTAtNI-IG 10.00 ACI'ES MOlE 01 lESS. ~w.-tld.oflongolllne~~O.60 .....~OEGbMlCMt-Olllood. PUIUC·~Wtabehlld"'~Cholnbwf. tog. "olIraI ~ 3Rt floor. St. lvcfII, County ......... nrto. a.Adlng. 2300 Y.-glnla A-...;. Fort ~ Aorlda .;.. F.bNGiy's,. 2002.-begINdng OIl 1,00 P-.M. 01 at won ....... at þOISlbk l'Utsu.v..r TO S«;tIon 286JJ105, f\ol1da StaM.s.' a,., IoIt 6eddeI.1o GpPMII any dIdIlon_..œ. by a IacJani. ~,ot~""'"""""loonyIllGlWCONld- ..d ala --""g at" ~ he will Med a -.:I of" ~4;.=:;tof~~-:~ ...tlich recon:I iIncWa 1M ~ oood ~ upon wfllê:ftttw~"tobebowd. 1OAlI)' ÒfCOMMlSSlOHEIS ST. LUOE COUNTY. flOilDA. N_c-d.OWIMAN Publish; Janucwy 22. 2002 ~3328S2 ," v ( ( """" PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 12/20101 File Number CU-01-007 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Manager ~¿ ~c-I~ r;:l'litn 2001 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Application of CPV CANA, Ltd., for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and operation of a 250 megawatt, electrical generating plant, to be known as CPV CANA, Ltd." in the U (Utilities) Zoning District. LOCATION: West side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTON: The proposed electric generating plant is a gas-fired, 250-megawatt facility. The plant will utilize a combined cycle generating unit to produce up to 175 of electrical power from its gas turbines and up to 75 megawatts of electrical power from its steam generator recovery system. The primary fuel used by the turbines will be natural gas, with the capability of using low sulfur (0.05%) No.2 distillate fuel oil as a backup fuel. ZONING DESIGNATION: LAND USE DESIGNATION: U (Utilities) - (assumed to follow RZ-01-015) IND (Industrial) PARCEL SIZE: 61.45 acres SURROUNDING ZONING: IH and U to the north, south, and northwest. AG-5 (Agricultural- 1 du/5 acres) to the east and north. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is industrial, pasture land, and citrus groves. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is IND and AG-5 (Agricultural - 5). FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #6 (350 E. Midway Road), is located approximately 15 miles to the northeast. "" ( '. (, ..."", December 17, 2001 Page 2 Petition: CPV/ CANA Ltd. File No.: CU-Ol-007 UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is served by an on-site well and septic system. Plant operations will be serviced by deep well withdrawals from the Floridan aquifer TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Range Line Road is 100 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. ***********.********** This petition is for a combination of Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval. As such, it is required to satisfy both the standards of review found in Section 11.07.03 and Section 11 .02.09 of the County's Land Development Code. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use and major site plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use has been determined to not be in conflict with any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.03(W)(7), U (Utilities) Zoning District, allows electrical generating plants as conditional uses. As noted in the comments below, the proposed site development plan that accompanies this request for a conditional use permit has been determined to meet the minimum standards of the Land Development Code. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The proposed site is located within an area zoned for heavy industrial uses. The proposed utility use of this property is considered to be compatible with the general characteristics of the surrounding properties (industrial uses) located to the north, and south of this site. Agriculturally zoned properties surround this industrial area. There is a ~ ( ( .I December 17, 2001 Page 3 Petition: CPV/ CANA Ltd. File No.: CD-OI-007 proposed natural Gas pipeline (Gulfstream) to be located along the northwest corner of the subject property. Construction of this gas line is expected to take place in the next few years. The subject property will have access to the power grid through the northwestern property line. The principal source of air emissions from the electric generating plant will be the combined cycle combustion turbine generator. The table below outlines the anticipated level of pollution to be generated from this facility: Potential Pollutant Emissions (TonslVear) NOx 96 S02 . 76 CO 226 PM,o 96 VOC 15 Since the projected emissions of NOx. CO, PMlPM-10 and SOs are all greater than their respective PSD thresholds, the project is considered a major source as defined by the regulations governing PSD for each of the pollutants. As such, a PSD permit from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will be required with a demonstration that there will be no violation of any National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NMQS) and that no PSD increments will be exceeded. The applicant's EPA application, air quality analysis and modeling indicate that the proposed electric generating plant will not cause a significant degradation of local ambient air quality and that the plant will be in compliance with all state and federal ambient air quality regulations. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The proposed property will receive water through an on-site well and sewer service through a septic system for all buildings proposed for this site. The access into the site is proposed as a single access from Range Line Road Although the site is adjacent to Glades Cut-Off Road, the railroad tracks prohibit acce.ßs onto Glades Cut-Off Road. As part of the construction of the proposed project, the developer shall be required to construct a dedicated right turn lane into this project site. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The subject property is predominantly a pasture with degraded remnants of both pine flatwoods and small freshwater marshes. In addition, 10 acres of the subject property is \.r- ( , ( ...., December 17, 2001 Page 4 Petition: CPV/ CANA Ltd. File No.: CU-01-007 severely impacted by an overabundance of Brazilian Pepper. A condition of the site plan will be that all exotics are removed from the site at the time of construction of the electrical generating plant. ******************** STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT/SITE PLAN REVIEW In addition to the minimum standards of review and project development set out in Section 7.00.00, Section 11.02.07, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum Standards of Reviewfor all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for Major Site Plan approval, utilizing these requirements and notes thè following: 1. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed building and use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County, and the proposed use complies with al/ additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. The proposed CPV, CAN A electrical generating plant is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. These policies include, but are not limited to: Objective 1 .1 .11 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states that the County shall work with interested groups and agencies to increase and broaden the economic base while expanding existing business and industrial opportunities. The proposed electrical generating plant will provide a continuous economic benefit to the County. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. 2. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES a. The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse affect upon nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed development is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The proposed site is located within an area zoned for heavy industrial uses. The proposed utility use is more compatible with the general characteristics of the surrounding properties (industrial uses) located to the north and south. The properties to the east and west are agriculturally zoned. "" ( ( ...., December 17, 2001 Page 5 Petition: CPY! CANA Ltd. File No.: CD-OI-007 There is a proposed natural gas pipeline (Gulfstream) to be located along the northwest corner of the subject property. Construction of this gas line is expected to take place in the next few years. The subject property will have access to the power grid through the northwestern property line. The development of the electrical generating plant is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The proposed property will receive water through an on-site well and sewer service through a septic system for all buildings proposed for this site. The access into the site is proposed as a single access from Range Line Road Although the site is adjacent to Glades Cut-Off Road, the railroad tracks prohibit access onto Glades Cut-Off Road. As part of the construction of the proposed project, the developer shall be required to construct a dedicated right turn lane into this project site. b. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. The developer has designed this project in a manner that will buffer the residential properties to the south. These properties are located approximately 1 mile away from the proposed plant. The primary construction area for the proposed electrical plant will be adjacent to Range Line Road. The developer will be installing landscape buffers along all perimeter property lines. c. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of the neighboring properties. C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public Facilities. The subject property will receive water services through an on-site well and 'Sewer services through an onsite septic system. D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written confirmation, or has otherwise demonstrated by substantial credible evidence, that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. \.or ( ( 'WI December 17, 2001 Page 6 Petition: CPV! CANA Ltd. File No.: CD-OI-007 The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written confirmation that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES The proposed building or use will be served by adequate school facilities The applicant is proposing a utility use that will not impact school facilities. F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section 11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, "Natural Environment Analysis': of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (August 1982). No protected plant species were observed within the subject property. The project site does not appear to provide significant nesting or foraging habitat for other listed species. As this is a disturbed site, a condition of approval will be that the developer removes all exotic vegetation from the site as a part of construction. COMMENTS The petitioner, CPV CANA, Ltd., is seeking approval for a conditional use permit in order fo construct and operate a 250 megawatt, electric generating plant for property located on the west side of Range Line Road, 112 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road, in the U (Utilities) Zoning District. The project will be known as CPV CANA, Ltd. Electrical generating plants are allowed as conditional uses in the U (Utilities) Zoning District upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petitiol" t:l the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any of the proposed structures or buildings on this site, all exotic vegetation found on the site shall be removed. 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits for any site construction, excluding site preparation work, the developer shall construct a dedicated right turn lanes into this site at the project entrance. '-' c (' ....., December 17, 2001 Page 7 Petition: CPY/ CANA Ltd. File No.: CU-OI-007 3. This approval is contingent upon the applicant using natural gas as its primary fuel with low sulfur fuel oil as a backup supply. Such use of the backup fuel supply shall not exceed 500 hours per year per turbine. Any increase in the number of oil operating hours for state and federal air quality permits shall require St. Lucie County Board approval as a modification to the conditional use. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. \w- ( '-' Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested conditional use. MOTION TO APPROVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE APPLICATION OF, CPV CAN A, Ltd." FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A 250 MEGAWATT ELECTRICAL GENERATING PLANT IN THE U (UTILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE... [CITE REASON(S) WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC] MOTION TO DENY: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF ,CPV CANA, Ltd." FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A 250 MEGAWATT ELECTRICAL GENERATING PLANT IN THE U (UTILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE... [CITE REASON(S) WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC] '-' ( ('.:.' .. ...., AGENDA - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20,2001 7:00 P.M. CPV CANA, LTD., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of an electric power generation plant in the U (Utilities) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: West side of Range Line Road, approximately 0.60 mile south of Glades Cut-Off Road. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testinwny and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners December 10, 2001. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on December 8, 2001. File No. CU-OI-007 \. "sr. LUee.' INTY PLANNING AND ,.. z<\. ' ..; COMMISSION PUBLIC: HEARING AGENDA December 20, 2001 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, NOTICE is hereby given in accordancE! with Section 11.00.03 01 the 51. lucie County land Development Code and the provisions 01 the St. Lucie County Comprehensive I PIon, the following opp icool¡ have requesled Ihol the Sr. ¡ Lucie COUIlty Planning and Zoning CommiSiion (amider ~hu¡r followil1g reqve<;t. crv CANA. L TO 101 u Chan9~ in lOI,;f1!,1 from ,tl(~ III ('Ildl/~lrifll. H(~uyyl. nnd U (UlilitiC'\)loning f)isllicl<; to the lJ (lltilitieslZonin9 Di~rriLI {Ç), 'he fo!fowillg {JeSClibcd PI{'1l01Iy Porcel ) COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION I, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUnl, RANGE 38 EASI, Sf. lUClE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUNS SOooOO'54"W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTJON I, A DISTANCE Of 28979B fEET. TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING, THENCE RUN SOOoOO'54"W. ALONG THF EAST LINE I Of SECnON I. A DISTANCE Of 36263 fEET; THENCE I RUN N69'59·06"W. A DISTANCE Of 660 fEET, THFNCE RUN SOO'OO·S4"W. A DISTANCE OF 330,00) fEET; THENCE RUN N89°59'06"W A DISTANCE OF 1976.38 FEET; THENCE RUN N44146'OO"E, ALONG. TH E EAS T LINE Of A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EASE. MENT. A DISTANCE Of 1869.7B fEET, THENCE RUN. SOO'00·54"W. A DISTANCE Of 635m fEET, THEN~" RUN SB9'59'06"E, A DISTANCE Of '320,00 fEET T~ THE POINT Of BEGINNING, ALL LYING ANDBEIN'G IN SECTION I. TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38; EAST, ST. WClE COUNTY. FLORIDA. AND CONTAIN,. ING 36.06 ACRES MORE OR LESS. . Po reel 2: I A PARCEL Of LANp IN SECTION I, TOWNSHIP, 37, SOUTH, RANGE 3B EAST. STc LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI. ¡ DA, SAID PARCEL IS DESCRIBED AS fOLLOWS, ' COMMENCE ATTHE NORTHEAST OCRNER OF SECTION I, THENCE RUN SOO'00'54W, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 1. A DISTANCE .OF 2B97.98 FEET, THENCE RUN N89'59'06"W,A DISTANCE OF 1320.00 fEET, THENCE RUN NOO·Oò·S<l"E. A DISTANCE OF 635.03 FEET, ,TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 660 FOOT WIOE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COM- PANY EASEMENT, AS DESCRIBED IN. OffICIAL RECORD£BOOK333, AT PAGE 248. O{ THE PUBLIC RECORDS, Of ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE Noo'00·S4~E. A DISTANCE Of 937.46 FEET, TO THE NORTHWESTERl YLlNE Of SAID EASEMENT, SAID LINE ALSO 8EING THE SOUTHEAST. ERL Y LINE OF THE 1 SO FOOT WIDE fLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD RIGHT·OF.WAY, THEN 'RUN S44'46'00"W, ALONG SAID RIGHT·OF.WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 6S3.3B feET; THENCE RUN SOO'00'S4'W, A ,DISTANCE Of 653..38 fEET; THENCE RUN S44·46·00"W. A DISTANCE OF 1216.39 FEET; THENCE RUN Soo·00·S4"W, ... DISTANCE Of 284.0B FEET. 'TO THE SAIDSOUTHEAS,TERL Y LINE OF THE 660 FOOT WIDE flORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT, THENCE RiJN N44°46'OO"W, ALONG SAID 1 SOUTHEASTERLY LINE. A DISTANà'OF IB69.7B fEET. TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING. THEt,BOVE' OESCRI#" ARCEl" CONTAI~. 4846 AC~íS~/~ORE' OR L~: .. . .. .. Parcel--3: .. .." A ·PARCECOf- lAND IN SECTION I. YOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH'-RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LUCIE COU('ITY. flORI- DA. SAID PARCEL IS DESCRIBED ~S fOLLOWS, COMMENCE· AT' THE NE CORNER Of SECTION I. TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH RANGE 3B EAST. ST. WCIE COUNTY, flORIDA, THENCE RUN SOOoOO'S4"W I ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, A OIS. , TANeE Of 2567_98 FEET, TO A POINT OF BEGIN. NING HI[NCf: CONTINUE SOOoOO'S4MW ALONG THE; lASr'lINE OF SAIl) SeCTION 1. A DISTANce Of' ]JODO fEFl THENCE RUN NBY"59'06MW A DISTANCl Of 1320 H~r. rHr:NCE RUN NOOoOO'54ME A DISTANCE Of 3]000 flU. THfNCE 589--'59'06"E A DISTANCf OF ! :J?O fEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AllI.Y)NG AND BEING IN S(CIION I, TOWNSHIP 37 SQUTH. RANG£: 38 fAST ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND CONTAINING 'ÓOO ACR(S MORE OR LESS, ¡ , Loeolion; We")1 side of Ronge line Rood. upproximolefy 0.60 j mile soulh of Glades Cut-Off Road. t 2 CPV CANA, l TO. far 0 Conditional Use Permit 10 allow I the I.:omlruc:tion of on electric power genl!rotion plont in the U (Utilities) Zoning Oi$trict for the following described _ property: /. . localion: West side of Range line Road. approximately. 06Q mile south of Glodes Cut-Off Rood. . 3. Verizan Wireless 0 Conditionol Use Permit to allow the plocement and construdion of a 200 foot toll tefecommuni. cafions lottice tower and associated equipment in the AG.l (A:gri<:uttvrol - 1 dv!acre)Zoning District for the following described property: THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. , ST. LUCIE COUNTY, fLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE I NORTH 20 FEET AND THE WEST 48 fEET THEREOF. location: 8803 lndrio_ Rood. Fort Pierce. PUBLIC HEARINGS wiIJ be held in Commission Chamber-$. I . Roger Poitros· Annex. 2300 Virginia Avenue. f.O. rt Pierc.e, Florida on December 20. 2001, beginning at 7:00 P.M. or I as soon thereafter os possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, flo,;da SlqMes. a a ""'_ son decides to appeal, any decision mode by Q boord. ; agency, Of: commission with respect to any ·matter consid- ered 01 Q meeting or hearing. he will need 0 record of the proceedings, and thot, for such purposes, he may need to ensure thot a verbatim rl!CDI'"d of the proceeding$ is made, which record Includes _the testimony and evidence vpon which tha oppeolls to be bosed. PLANNING '¡.,ND ZONING COMMISSION SI.. LUCIE COUNTY, flORIDA /S/ Slafan Matthes, CHAIRMAN Publish: D~ember 8. 2001 230113S rhe Tribune, Saturday, DecÉmib~'â, 20011 " , '-' ......, AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ~ DATE: February 5, 2002 REGULAR [XI PUBLIC HEARING [ I CONSENT [ I TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-60 - Endorsing the Replacement of the Bascule Bridge (North S.R. A-I-A) over the Intracoastal Waterway with a Fixed Bridge; and Urging the St. Lucie Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Direct its Staff to Coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation District IV Office to Prepare an Amendment to the Long Range Transportation Plan and Place this Project on the MPO'S 2025 Long Range Transportation (Needs) Plan and Cost Feasible Plan. BACKGROUND: R. Allen Miller, Certified Financial Planner for Certified Investment Advisors of the Treasure Coast, Inc. requested that a resolution be drafted endorsing the replacement of the Bascule Bridge over the Intracoastal Waterway with a fixed bridge. The attached Resolution No. 02-60 has been drafted for that purpose. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-60 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson absent) r¡;L-¡~ Douglas Anderson County Administrator County Attorney, M Review and ADDrovals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other, Finance, (Check for Copy only, if applicablel___ Eff. 5/96 · '-' - .."",,¡ .. RESOLUTION NO. 02-60 A RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BASCULE BRIDGE (NORTH S.R. A-I-A) OVER THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY WITH A FIXED BRIDGE; AND URGING THE ST. LUCIE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION DIRECT ITS STAFF TO COORDINATE WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT A TION DISTRICT IV OFFICE TO PREPARE AN AMENDMENT TO THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN AND PLACE THIS PROJECT ON THE MPO'S 2025 LONG RANGE TRANSPORT A TION (NEEDS) PLAN AND COST FEASIBLE PLAN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of 81. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. For some time the members of the North Beach Association have been concerned about the deteriorating condition ofthe North Bridge over the Indian River Lagoon. 2. This Board believes it is in the best interest of the health, safety and public welfare of the citizens of 81. Lucie County to replace the Bascule Bridge (North 8.R. A-I-A) over the Intracoastal Waterway with a fixed bridge. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board endorses the replacement of the Bascule Bridge (North A-I-A) over the Intracoastal Waterway with a fixed Bridge. 2. This Board urges the 81. Lucie Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization to direct its staff to coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation District IV Office to prepare an amendment to the Long Range Transportation Plan and place this project on the MPO's 2025 Long Range Transportation (Needs) Plan and Cost Feasible Plan. · '- - ......,! '" After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XX Vice Chairman Cliff Barnes XX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 2002 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY Dee 1S U1 U~:U~p vUOl ur' n.l.J.&:"11 11.1...1.11,;"1 ... \..f ALLEN MILLER, CFP f{~~I'~'~. "'". - ""..q ";;'-~~9-1 ..; P.O. Box 3957 Ft. Pierce. FL 3~9~8 Dccember 19,200] Doug Coward, Chairman Board oFCounty Commissioners Sl. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave it. Pierce, Fl 34950 Dear Mr. Chairman and Commissioners: Attached is a lener from Shirley Burlingham, President of the North Bcach Associalion. For some time members or our community have heen concerned aboul the deteriorating condition of the North Bridge over the fndian River Lagoon. f am also including 7 copies. that the County Manager indicated that you would need of the citizens petitions we solicited on bchalf of this project. We respcctfully request that the County Commission adopt a resolution to endorse the replacement of the baseulc bridge (North SR AlA) over the Intracoastal Waterw<\y with a fixed hridge. The purpose of this resolution is to request that the St. Lucic Urban Arca MelroJ"!olitan Planning Organization (MPO's) direel its staŒto coordinate with the Floriùa Departmcnt of Tro.nsportation (FDOT) DislrictlV ortice to prepare an amendment to place this project 011 the MPO's 2025 Long Range Transportation (Needs) Plan and Cost Feasible Plan. It is our understanding that thc LRTP amendment is the first step required to fund the construction of this project. We would therefore greatly appreciate the support of the Commission's MPO members to ensure that this project is subsequently identified 011 the MPO's Transportation Improvement Program and FDOT's Five Year Work Program as ~oon as a funding source can be secured. As you process this request I would appreciate it if you would keep both Shirley Burlingham (466-4908 - I;nx 466-2702) and myscll' advised as to its progress. ¡ fyou need any additional information please ll:c1 free 10 contacl either of us. '-' ',,\ ~!(â 6 /" <.1 I Jf '''''; / / //) .. \ \ \ -...' November 15, 200 I Mr. Darryl Dnunmond, Chaimlan Metropolitan Plannif'g Agem:y 1505 Orange Avenue Fort Pierce, FI 34950 Dear Chairman Drummond: At a n...'Cent mœting of the North Hutchinson Island rcsiJents with tht' Florida Department of Transportation, for the purpose of discussing the rehabilitation of the North BIÍdge over the Indian River Lagoon, many r.1cts were brought to our attention The plans for the thirty five day dosing of the bridge in 2003 wen: arUlClunccd and discussion took place for emergency serviees and evacuation The replacement of this drav., bridge with a fixed high risc bridge was the larger part of the discussion Island resident:> have discussed this with the J'vfPO and you have recognized the need According to Commissioner Hutclúnson, it has been placed on the long range plan We specifically asked what we needed to do next and Mr Dennis Murphy explaineJ the procedure to us. It is our understanding that we must ask tòr this bridge to be prioritized. By reque"t through this letter, we are asking that the MPO plaœ us on the agenda for your December 6th, 2001 meeting The purpose oftlùs request is that the MFO amend the "2020-2025" plan to include the bridge and that it be prioriti2.cJ. Tlùs would then begin the process which would take tì'om 10 to 12 years for finalization and construction We thank you for this opportunity and tor your realization thaI tlús is vital to our community and the economic welfàre of the County. There are many residents of Port St Lucie that work on the Island and businesses on Route I and downtown Fort Pierce depend on the trade from the residents. It is a vital link in case of disaster, emergencies or storms. Sincerely, Shirley Burlingham, President <t .. . . . ~ ..., Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement VTe the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the C mmissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # 1 \"\, F+-t---- \~ C;oC/-CZ j) ft { ff If dOY, It: fc~vu tf. S~Ç007/ ,?c£ ,&a,~ 1 ~ _~-cJ5/ }?, IJ-I-.,1 #/~-J ·~zæv:....c- "1-__l '3 rif(-j7 / 2 .. J "]~Cß~ 4 2" 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 I tv,..... Id. I ....¡ ~! 11 (/-oG <;-1· :-¡ ið' ,~ ^ . I , ,)~: .~,. - y_J'( '. ....'1 . ,. -;. _, 15 ~ )--~ '- 1/ .f' -LJ' ~_. f I ~.\ í ~ L,\J1> ,þ .. . -, - ~ ' .- >i "J ï 'ì -. iy- L I.. j .\ ~:. ::ì t! I· " j '-{ Cj 1..1 c; / A-\ A-- :t (/ v:) ,I ,..1 .') t,1 ¡ 16 17 ;.', I .':::,-t,.4ì ~T 1'f::7t.tC ~iftlf9 , , , ¡--. (~' f,--I~ "','C ," 1 "" '"" ~,/,/ { / (or 19 . "> . . .. . '-' .." Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # I ßt3J <T11/1¡1ì' II 115¡)C=V ('Jqtt.LOS O. j)Et.!e~ 2 ""-''''' Ld' "" ~, Á' - /.- j"r.;v" '.....' rt! .J....;. _I"" ,~.... 1 -; :w t C:, :..,-, _J - I -. ~ 3 ~ oR.ê~ q-- ,f' \.j'\:.- ._'~l¡-'::·-l 4¿~~ if PT. PIf:7"LŒ, ;=L" .5-0 'I 7 Á/. IJ 1 Ii I H :J .:rç--i- /" /\'.. ¡; "'; (" ,~.,,, 3L.( rr'fl:J .:7--> l-/" If- -').. ?-- 9'0 -', , ~ ' ~. I' -" # r 'J . , Ü)IJJ-.[;, ':1 Ò ¡.J 7 . t!/ I- \ I:' - f '''f / §': 'l .cc - 6'-/s i! ) ~-... 5 . ...j r~~ß - "-~ -. .' C~ 6' Î1 Ii; . , 7 1 , ~ ,I, <. -I ¡ 8 '. . ~. f' 4t:/ 0&50 9 10 '" II I( I // Iff&o- /1101 12 ¡;)~r/at.{& .50l(1 f\I(}lfiJ: (r,(¡?-) C", .,.¡-J ~.. .. ~ ,-' . -- , ,'" . . . )..- ,',.1 .! _/.,-,- . " -'/1' /r .- I.:"¡ ! /' '~ì. - , ........ ~ t::" c~,' 4''' ""..,r-"'f \.. '\r.'-" , " I - r-# ¿lljJ,M 7Jtd/C«- of V', (I :~y;. ;)/ . ' ~;. "\ . l .! _ ~ _.,.. ~.,,..,, ~.., ~r 1._ ,~''''" '.A ...:..:;' / 11 13 , ¡.. - ,I ""'. L/b/ ¿).2. C'O . 14 15 16 17 19 '. . ~' ..."." ~--~-'---, . Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bfffige-Repa.i~..&Q:~:=~:::) We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissionf~s of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolution in support of the r-.letropolitan Planning Organization (i\1P0) request to FDOT for the rebabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutcbinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # 2 Ü:U1lliLKuh 11 ~e. 14~ H í c¡h/C{h(1 br, S [, crrg - C1Lf/j' ___ '0, i___~-J~ J-;/\/('~/¿..~ /< ))(J{ j3"'-ct/~ /J:- '1';;,;(-, /7cii? ~ (:3-f:N~çy ?1/3J) <;ktl'1!<kd !#1-tJMS 1/ ~Ví' ¡. \')I\;\,(qìì q,)~ 7'l(' (J / 56 7~ ç Ç7 J--- ~? f N (tI td.1(~'/"(' 1¿¡(c-f(Í..JÕ ,..Q5"é),.Q /)t. A~(~S('" ({JJ~ ,~15~/~')OO, d0()7.5 (I, F, tf~'5 Ic:u;q 6 a ·_~(pS '.3 3 4 5 6 ï 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I·. 16 17 19 , . . ". '-" "'" NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FOOT Bridge Repair & ReJ)lacement (Replacement means a fixed bridge) We, the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. lucie Cou~ty to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FOOT for the rehabilitation-&..replllI'Pment of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name 12. Address /> ¡ /J ' Ý:? (í;)- c; k Co ve 1/-1, Phone # 1/'7 - (Jùt.) 3. UM1.J-J ~ I'd.)) ~ ~ tL CL\~u.\ <l q.30S i II ( f0é-&¿:S¡; '/. I- (. to' ." :" (i ,- J i {--. 6. 7. ,-/&43/S0 8. !...:," t"l ~.' -- ~ '" 9. 10. 9ft -L~-P/~~ 7Þ ?- 11. / I 13. 15. . I/. ..-7'7 : ¿F· "I (¿' 't) " , - ¿ G-~9'ß¿þ 14. ,.;.jh4w,,~~ UJ )·.J,f N FLJLL) P1...tAS2 PúT Sl-l~t::¡- Tó 11t~ ~j 1\ (, 1< . \ 16. , .1-' .. , " v ~ NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FOOT Bridge Repair & R~lacement (Replacement means a fixed bridge) We, the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of 51. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FOOT for the rehahilitation.&.replllC'.P.TTlP.flt of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name Address Phone # ...~ ~ I /./ (,I Lf./ n Lf".,,-T{;:_' 2. ,-/i í w-"'l /)../'1/ " -- - 3. ,,,,,,,. S';;/O t ..¿-;¿¡I €.( ~ 6 Æ ·7'1..ì.. ~f /Ire f-jg31 ,'" ~£ If- "~~~lö 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. o (' - /l/!..... C:. 9, /,/ 'a.-I-<- l-(../ 10,:'2-,- 11. yY 12, 13. - f:"'~'.J ~ Ç" t:," It uí ,S' A -e f:r -r / () , .i)~...", c/) /3 d C /( ~ . v ."."" NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FOOT Bridge Repair & Rt:placement I (R~plac~ment means a fixed bridge) ~~~J -¡-JOY R fpITI ¡Zö<¡') . _.- - ""- - We, the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FOOT for the felíabtli¡¡¡5ij~?TP.plstCP.mP.nt of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name Address /J -:J í /0.' - .' - .. . . _ ~ . Ii ¡ 1:¡' þ"' !..f' {'T ' fZÇ3 (? 1'7'", /I "r~ 'l' A" ~ , '\., 'IrJ (j '\ p., ; _? -- " . ' 'I'"i 2. ---' .~'\-U/'.:?l'lnerud'+ )IL~:·t..'!,~.~t ~'::'I<:'Þ IF\ 3. /Ud.ú-Í/ (/. /¿';ru/ .:J-~7t" (}M/7¡P'f» (>v,..- ~7 . 0IvOJJ-- .it Phone # J-!t:¿: - ) 4 7 f Lii ./( ~/' j" -- ;' ~ j--J ,-J'...~ . i ~Î l.- <+/'bc.fcos- LlM- il.::.J~r f-ú~7? 2 .- ~ () 4- S 4. 5. 6. 7. ¿q/J-r-('l~-(1/, Þ!-tfl" ,í.. _ I I ,/ f # ,/ /, .-' .I 8 ./,'1, :'>'1 ___....; . . . _,,'.... ./.... '- r..--,"", ;¿. . f:; p - ; d d n .- ¡ 9. .~. r v 0 7 1 O.J1~,,~/I.-, V J- A Y fr? - - .¿ . ,-f' Ji r:;/{ t/- r)" . . ll~t~~r~ /" £373 Xi,e!'-/, ¿¿/ø-<¡ \J - ".--~ -r-' ,,:~ ¡.' 12. ~ .---!-.- (./ . ,,~ .t',\ '(' Á.}J./ I., Lv ~ 'n~.-" - \ Î"I \ /"\ /-.. 13. "', ....~~lo.)'.' _'..._ '/ .-' ..j, ."'..... ., (1, ?_~"^ J . Q .v 15. \. 1-(':' ?-!: 3 Ò6' ~1. ~/-.ft¡ic¡ 14. -51 ¿:/ (f cno-¡e.t , 4.1 ~ /)/:.. &~ Y¿f ~ (ì ...-;.. 7'/,/, - Ý 735 j../[;,1-9"-/.'5 -3 . () " 16.£-\..--0¡.¿....¿..¡'-_~ IJJ \-t ~ ~ t== U L L- P L [ h Sf: P L) ') S if E'~ T 10 i T/f ~ f3 (¥...-J< , . . '-'" '-' NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement (Replacement means a fixed bridge) ,V~iA.1 - )J C Î ¡:!.L- ('/>' , " - We, the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of S1. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabiJitation-&.replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO, 10. Phone # 4. 5. 6. - -1<1 ð Ie. . - 'it: Z -p if 0 ~,.5-7 r7 7. 8. 9. 11. 13. 14. :4~ If.A<¡dc;!! ~----: / 15. I / - fZÍ/~át.A¿ 8·ri . ,~~ (0.----(.. . /J ( '1 -'I: ¥ / ,:2. "eM 'i/>A Þ.. - -r'. r ~ é; t· I.".:' 12. 4 & -) ~ 5·)-ccí " . ,/~" - ;>'. - '""' / -'., .'" ,~, . ~ - -'-'7. I ;- -2 ~7 v / ,-"" _ , . .',.l ." ! ú: '~,l . 'r 16. ~ ';WCr C-Æ / , ." ~;;¡,; ~ ¿. ~ I' (I,"" ' ~ I G Ie u-' ~_ . ~.., ;;Y¡jJ'J _') -, D (- l- t. t.. I t ,-r ( ~ f17131 ...., .' .!.f 1- I. . I it.,---: . , . , ~ '--I' oft 4'H/Ç/v FLLL- tPLEPr52 (JL ~ S i-r-ê E"I -r-D f~Nf T L-\E (:2.. :.:". ~"' t . r'"\ U IV. ') -. 0.--- '1' , . I ~ Vi I, L. . v ...J '" ...." Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to 1\1P0. Name Address Phone # I r (\ J à~ uiL .~/'~'''-'' r;~o- ;:;:~ '-j{)oò /V-A -J -,4 Yff7 - )..Ç/ ~ If- 6 0 ,.) 11· 11- - 1- 14 .. / ,'. - Ú 0-';;:' (-, '-1'-/- "1.../ 2 3 '.' ~..,..-.: 4 C. i &- 0 f'r1 e e.. 1<:.. 1¥U~ ~~ , ( (~o;;..) !Jl7 It - f . It- .. ~{Pb ~ ~~'1-57¡ 5cr¡Ç - 6 ì t ( Lfh Lf-- 8' ð'f~ Lf ::'c - so f&, 7 '+?'~ - / / t.f.5" 5 y O() () 6 C HI¡R L t:,S frrTA A µ ,:c'"u oS: ~. iJÎl, Ge.4)aµ " ,1 ~ .. V 'j~<rl .1 /~-rJ: . . J . f -.,"_ ~ '1 !' r, " 'I " (f 7 8 -' -r"" " 9 10 ; .~ I:- _d14~ .( ( // II z.¡¡ j-, lr:; )., Ú II 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 '"-" ....., Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, 'Will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # I , . f . t-'tu ) .../ ..~. ...-, .: { . ..j, J,... 2 t~/ / 3 .-.....'-./-'" /' / /;:-:' P,o, /.." /' =.:~......, .' -' ,-,/' r-, v/ r' L/ r'J, -' ~ / ¡l_~_V :~~<"... ~ ç.". - o. '.~ ,. . ,I£.. " if {c:' ~.,." ; If#' ......,'" " / 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 '- -.....I . NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & R«placement (Replarement means I fixed bridge) We, the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation.&...n-.plllf·.P.ment of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name Address \ -s;;ztJ.;¿ L..ð~~.:.~ ~¿;", -;p s J 'f 2- ~.ü.., kÀ-r- -'-p. j-J¥ol> ~ 7 ;; h,... 1:- ìf-J A..V.::.~ Phone # ·9.3£/ - b g -% 6{,S 4t?cY -ft:.tS- 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. '-'- . '-II p~,;irìon f¡)f Regolution re' 1\mih Hutchin;;on Island FDOT Bridg!" Repair & R.:pjacemer;~ We thè- uM~r~!:.:~~c Mll1'llj ¡.H:ILUUlJ LJ,~ CUll11ljÜ"h;..'llcfJ ('fthe Cit) of Fort Pi"rii [a,1'}¡j t.hi Coll1æissioneiS of St. Lucie C01.mty!o pas3 resolutions in 5UPPQ.rt of the Mct,opolitan F!anmng Orgar;izat¡oc (MFO) request 1:Q FD()T fer the rehab¡litatioL & rt:placeine[¡~ öfthe North Bridg;:> on Noah rtntchir.son Island Such resoiutk,ns, after adoption, u.iU b,:, sent by each body to :\1PO. Name Address Phone # 1 ¡;~ø.. ~ n.. 8&.....'" I>~ ~li:w.Q .9flWlt (", l) If "$ ~:;ß:3 \ 2 y..,f¡~.J.I-:)j;:ñg¿. . /" _¢.~.f.#J.U<4~_ffi~~-é- flZ/;;;).J!6.!J _/~f:.."; / 3 4 5 6 7 8 -..-----.-------------- 9 10 ------+------ 11 12 13 1¿1 15 ._-,-_...........-...--.----.0. 16 ìï ---------'--... -.---- 'Q 1- \.,.;- -..J Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # I 6;.f'.e>V''¡ C (j2 ({e ,"-- 2.Jìé/o jJ !r 1 f) )1,.. /.. r:;r-f ;-:/.:. -'/ - H:' .j ~ ¡ I 2 (I, ;. ~-' - . , .' r- I~ rr t 5:JLjq tV H 1 A ¡Jnd i Sa.:- ::::. ._ JY4-lv/--, 1\/ '_ ¡ C ":X. .- ______..,.~~"'-"'-1.-.~..-_'____ 3 ì ~ ~ .",' /-: .../.... -·7..-;~-=:'" ,..... .,.-J - . J 4 /j'f~¿4" %~~,1-/ S/ t 7 /1//?..A Itnd- ~J' ¢g-~ - f-.s 'It, ?., 7 0 13l5tÙ-\.ÙÞA (3cJ V Å fl, ý'- Cft; r¡.o ) 7}" b V2;1...1-I.t>4- ß::-,-J.. ù,e , if/(? N -A f f.) ~ bæJ'l ¡) f)~~. ('2-7 4"~ ð~ C:t ¡¿7 ~~~ð/{)~& JfJ~ M ~Q-l t\l ~R Cì 6 CA~fj? .fî\AI2-I ,J A ,e-t) U ' ' J 7 . (L'II . clJ.fU'1û'B 5 lfGcÝ- 'f'1 L{ () l/67-og-70 8 Æ/""'" ß~~ ðZ¿ß/L t.¡j S - ¡' 60 0 <¡ fø Ç"-l ~ob 9 10 ~, /~ " / ¡ , /.7/;' <I(~é J-; -:-~ - 11 ! \ --'~-_. ~ ' ~ , 12 f!tOI ::;J1I¡o~5 4ðrYO IV A/tJ. ',~~/j.·e~1 Jt) {'J1.1l~LS¡)(¡'1 AJ. AjA; :; ( :t.é¿,~U;j!-C~//!fMti¿ S6 4 q J1 ~<~ (.':1.. . '-f¿/- œ;;';L 1(P 1- /0'6g- '::/5'11 =Þo 13 14 15 ~~t\ Cf\--rJ - t::; ..::> )..¡-1 N , \ ~ ~(J..\'<',~ \ '-, \r"! t..J --Y \ ,4v" it ') ßt.-! c.) (Jet . J0L.{'1 :l' 1 T -'- l ¡./-¡ ·v L 1 . , - ¡ (Lv! 1 m.A_A~ f1. ;/'11- (.7 -f' t. ~ H '¡ '7/"0/ 5/7 J 16 17 19 . . '1\) '-" 6 u V- D 2. i LA ì ty '. · ......, Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pier'e and the Commissioners of S1. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the MetroJ Jlitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. 3WlJ . ~ 3c LfW--S-Y'òp 3U-o N/'Ifi H79 t;.&(l..s¢71 . i #~7 I t) Name Address Phone # , s-i i - ')'11~5-F~/ *,\(0 )é 5r r (,(, -.Plo C. L/tt.-S4¡)h ygC( :; 514 Cf£cf ?1ç~ .Jfj- sø / j/ '-I65/lftc(, yc"o !,.-.l"rs ...¡ b () :;1u tP/ 'Vj \- ~I '.?'l~\ . Ç'- ç~ 16"¡ ~?)]-73 / ~J 17 -r~éu ~A...".7) 3:::J.O&>Á/ð ¡J.-l-ÄÍ-A-:~ '"1 I ') s". . .~~.~ y: i '1 ( 71 C(Æ;/ it- /il 2 I I ~ . ", ~~'."",' ," ~.. . .~ ~", -""'C tfj() i./- I ~/(P .),,1//+ - I/JC-/ .]"},ool Ìr/A 1f~tJJ ;, ~L? 7}·11//1 #f¿75 4f) ,..., -7,....ðð / {.ð'-' 6 '~rzj-7 ,Ld - 3,;1O¿J ;4.$ ¡/ ~ /.1/0 , /, II' / ..jrLL..u,,/¡¿; /:J<ð¥ 3~¿) /lJ AT~~/i {J ..Uì/ tl ðv r .f'rÁX ~ gJ-o 6 71. pIP IL' !D K \~ ~~ l / If -!!:- ~'ö' (IJl~ ~ 3 . () "'c '=r~/ 0' ;;;~ ( , 4 5 7 8 9 10 -3;;JOO µ ¡:¡. FA ..,¡Ltðol ..... 0 -3~¡j4iA '* ~ 11 12 13 14 15 19 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I7 19 \..l '-II Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of 81. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # , I..' t) /¡ II", ! ' 1 ~'lJ/vfß{.A ¡J;-I )J-L , I I . //7 . .c'/ 2 I->~ ~"-"V'\.~ . it. Y-I (;r-t;)..) ¡JUt{ A 1 4 \ I 3 l}G~ - U )-2~- (I I l II I! '( I ( 3 rLuA"U Þó~da.-n d/3 mar¡¡1C!tlJr rfJ 3<1'7'17 !/f¿Jy-ro1-01 / ) J)p\¡¡Ü fJ L5Mr=t- 1J'L.r:UlRiftlA- Dt.,L~ I r:fPIr;¡~(.t;RJY9fì ~~~-2.5t ŒDUît:. K .I::t-ne..l 2-iq rtax I nèL ]x.,.f.t:": :tUCL¡ £. ~~ l5.,I)~.25q I~CIfÞlfP .$ ~.~~ m rnaftlÁ fA JtHn(7lt) ~T flt-'([(,c~~14J~-;: L I AlO£}. J;" fYl pt ~ S 'L 2- '"L rn ~ t'll...{ po J)K \ J/:. (- r ~I k (1. (.{.?' ., 1 , '-f:},.v·" < v-L{ C.~ ~ 2.11 (YIai,·.... PV\'Jt ff, PU{{q f=L ~ Y1't'1 .. ~?ß ?6-~~.A? .-/ ¿:?GOd #Ø?uX ~_ ?4;~. -Jd~f"181 {/ ç; I" .d/ -07' - ti.-/' rf II /' /. If.lJ 7f<',)-¿YC; ..) 1// /fit /lt4dl/f/t 1/J{I.L/ // ~ 1[/ M / A i- 7-/ 5/1l7I1 ¿/11; '-" (~ eMU ....., Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # I "0/&/- fo 73 c.¡. "j 9-1;; ~A.ß7 /,., / 1- __ Á I J /J YS--3tP~ ~ /2l I)t,· C" (' ,{ / )r.'A:'--fA., (, (! Jú.iA.Ú:, j-'( ") YiY<; ..J t" , / .1-'/", /" I., '77 7 ___7, ~...c;; C; /:.F,-,' ~//1,,,':-¿.- /. J (../lÆ;;"~, .// .ç.. ¿t:'<-:: 7'X ,)Y-/~7 ~ -Ó>.;:¡~-ð ~ t \. /) " ~ 4U-~è> ~ (I" \')'-"'1" .'J'ì I n ~.. ) ( '--'..-{...Ll.~~·L -L"'I..-() I 2 3 ,~v~ Ç-L""o{. i- t-L.:.,i./l. I! C . ~~^ -r;~)U~ ;:1.'; G:-u:~-f1'~ Rd Ff 2 ~-t..e, t={ ~C¡-/9ð~ :Jf"~I1,'ifll.w 1;5'GÀ]~:;~ F1 . *,4-~ ~"'C" c\.. ~Jv-.c:L"-C' L,-,- ~ /- J. J" I E P- C cr " Ii 'J ~'j 1: 'r)' "L c-' . [") ~G-gg'iD, rj ( (,.Ie;} I - 'v-<.~ ¡, 1,'1. 'FI í" ML : _ ò,'t'j 9 1 . . ~, I 0 . '-g~'lö' fti..(((¡,- I, ".l-l ~ ( .l "¿'Le '" ì(\... ¿i.:-I-é¡lv,,,,¡c)! ",::tL 3'-1C¡'fCj ~w ~UkL/' /I~ d)~~~ \ (LA , u: ~ ~l~~5f7'--%. 4t:> 7 -ó¿;(.., Ç- , ~~~~""""S::~.~,~~ \\\~Gl \h::::..'""r-l P\~~l cí· ~"TLH ,~<",'.. ~LJ\"'b,(l ~"'C¡I..\\ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 ~ QLw~ ~ ........., Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan .llanning Organization CMPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name ,"'-- I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I5 16 Address Phone # Jf-fd -..3ð.P ð f r: r ¡It.. (2. .:,£ /f!..,l- 138' Ô f-í.. flCN..'Æ 1.:,1- /3J7ð c....- ~t:,~~J3ð /? c R c." /oJ' (:. T '( /7/.-?'¿C {-- - rî ~t:, bLl.a...ð / j e·v-u:')t \.. t 1--1 r¡-e ( c e.. I')'. rVl.(/.i?//l ¿¿"j¡'/Í.~ tf." 11 ,fL{l/:,& . \ '\-~ ~-''-~-¡ ~""'Ð~'. ~ ~ -t17 L\.e/-.:~ . , ~ß~13~ ô.-Hv rÎ 11'\..,,- C .\ . n- 1 LC 'l ( ~~g - c\ -\- \ .¡~~. fi ""\ \;, ~ 'l.'LP . P;_Ul c,"- 19 \..,...- t)~~.:J &vLJ ........, Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City ofFo"1 Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the J.letropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # l'.- ;), ( ¡Ç(/) ~7)' (.jy ì d;!u ia..4L ""¿C',. Il{ /Ue ß",( JJL~I(i.<..I.("'cti.. 2 /.('c:. O(./."._~....-.g.."'C) CÎ £" / 7"¿/ - 2 L' OÇ, 1'1/ ,~ 1-1....",4. 3 , , ¡;¿C"1 Q,~.,. ~ .-, C.ì::t-",.. ~,/V\.. S '- -I "-I LS Ie¡ I 0 4 ,,~ \ !\\. /I 5 1\ , \ 6 .Ud2E1 G- .- Y(J.),Q J'J { //" "'" 7 . < (( , I( 8 /3>(; (J tdil'.... ('a'fL, 4.~~ < /I{, .5-- (t:) 3 ,-( 9 I ( " ({ I, 10 ~~l, c;/L/'¡ f:2 £¿jS' ~//I 5i, -;/ &'C1{. Y-l)~rlf§2· ¿ y¡Jl ~ I I 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 '-'" t)LUvI-LJ ~ ........, Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDaT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the l"'1dersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commis~ ;mers of S1. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # 1 .....).!/ ~/I h("" /....J _ìJ!' "; . ;:j, / C~,.:. ;/ -';... Uf,J ¡'-,-< fo..l-.:. _""'- ~, , o(..{l;.w :~r. f ,'I..I~''''-L-,~.'' 76·;;'> J-':,··',,7' , . ~ -- 2 3 Y¿' <.J.;J r/-' 716p,-/7'.% #¿S.:.Jt22 </-Lj- ~-¿ ~ ~ 4 /7 ~ cr /7 ~ (3f- 5 6 (!¿Lj - ¿'I:S'-)- 7 #)"'/I~7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ." / - . ,/. , i , ~' J- ) ,) - \ ",' ...... ' c v'" ~ '-"t;~~ 1'-:{C'tldL . ) l¡)l<;;<',-1(~t1I/"';¿ ..)(;.'/- vj-t:.- U ·?1. (<k7::--------- ;¡;;'I--.I.,;(r;. (1 ,-Z-.-.c A{rf -t. c ~ ," "'- / I 7 Ú", é ,.,.... /J ^-,I..~ ('~ ~-I )-9.2{ r 16 \~. <V.-,--,..J \ \. ..~ ~í S é~jV'\. We\, F. -to ~~, __ '- l-:i-.. ~ 'If '1) \, - ,- ·Vt,.;.,~-/) {j¿(-'.... I( 1 t2./- 'l:, 4J~h e'T Lí. /l.-I'{'-/i..::.-?-_, JJ.~ h( r I I . I ~# !Yr.:¿'C": /.,n,,;.¡ ,",'.. (;."r"'......"." 14 15 17 19 /./. ".¡, .-C·--tl;'·" .I,r r-L PetitIon tor Kesolutlon re: Nonn tlUICnmSOD .l:>!èWU .n.........' ,.........b~ --1"-- - ---r---- ! We the undersign~ar by petition the Commissioners ofthe;City of Fort Pier~ the Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation &¡replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption,! will be sent by each body to MPO. , Name 2 3 4 Address Phone # 1 ~4,f 1Y -' tf1)21V/Y , ! . / I j) ...l?J' 7/..d"/4,j¿'þo'/ ?/¢:,N'. /J1...-9 ~:lþ/-!.,. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 """' ......, Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of S1. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # C/ ,d~L'"ç¿' //tj{Ç:{_p.ßt'<I') /2-jJ r!T / -'1 ,¿:¡¿, '7-~ Sq !J./v CJ rð 1 ...q t ~ g ~j -7'17/ ( /ò/~ . v. ,¿7 2 3 4 r 15't,4/ ,Æ,1l 5 ~OO 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 ~ '-" Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island mø'Ii Bridge Repair &. Replacement I I . We tbe uodersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of~e City of Fort Pierce and the CommissioDers of 51. Lucie County to pass resolutions in s~p'port of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FOOT for the rehabilitatioo'& replacement of the North Bridge 00 Nortb Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adopti~n~ will be sent by eacb body to MPO. I ' , , , 1 ! Pbone # Name Address ;C7 j I, r-~/ . J . - / ;: , 1 fL., //¿</, ( / \,-:l:,') - .f~ F, f' i ' 0 VI - Y fR>& j~_.. ,'.- , I -, I 2 . ¡.~ - tdt. /1 ¿¡y.,J - ìJ. 'I~"" .J,¡. .;1 (- J.. 3'1' 3if.(ð 3 IVeJS·~'??. T f<e d p{....yt I,!' SGj-1.f ~ J -(",' > l· ~ .. I' r') - -' f __\. . I ' 4 .I Pr-".-~-~-- ~ .~..~.. =- -: - ,-,<¡ -I:. .. -I¡¿·n/~·~'. . ~ -~- ~, . I ./ i ___h¡, I ". , 'r O]/S - , f "" f ¡" ~ /' ,. " I" ---- ',.. ¡. ' ~ I I' ': . I ·1 i 6 I: : : I ,. " 'I , 7 .' 8 I " ,. 9 10 ¡ 1 , '. 11 12 13 14 15 16 . . 17 , II !I ;1 ,. 'I 19 :1 PETITION FOR ~LUTION: NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND BRIb....ÎR.EPLACEMENT We, the undersigned residents of North Hutchinson Island, hereby petition the City of Fort Pierce . Commissioners and the St. Lucie County Commissioners to pass a resolution in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) request to FDOT to rehabilitate & replace the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, upon adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. NAME .1 ~ ~ . Ljq;'1 S+J¡ /Jk¡t e , /l1I/iJ &-v;"t) J C-f~'H~· _ J1;W{~Ü'~ It ~, (a~ül1ltJ~ ~41DCL'L..Q ADDRESS PHONE Sbl-Sfo7'O/L/ c¡ '" NC;' tk. 3dd.~ S Loll/1M"'..) Cir.#-.1 fl,k]."I1<:Do.,]:"k."cl ~~4lrl..o\O- II '1 . ~ " PETITION FOR ~LUTION: NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND BRI~PLACEMENT . We, the undersigned residents of North Hutchinson Island, hereby petition the City of Fort Pierce Commissioners and the St. Lucie County Commissioners to pass a resolution in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) request to FDOT to rehabilitate & replace the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island_ Such resolutions, upon adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5_ 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. / I I , / 13. 14. 15. 16_ 17. 18. 19_ 20_ 21. ADDRESS PHONE Rlv£/2~¡jJ¿ Ai >--::< ~'':.:..o ~_.? _s_ L.Al¿Í/IÍ~K/' C//Z. 7H~$",tjt//J.S xl lé /75-9 - _. -' - ...-..:; v J'~...I.--, -é} 5' Xú...k..¿t<-c.~~~ 2 .' -~-o-'J-176 .y¿. - I +lci- ~-3 C~ 1tci-,- 30;;" '-{-(o 5-ct '-f '--{ 0 " ( I' J ! ~L/i}.- IlG 1¿Q.. K-t J 1/\. ¡' ,,7 .-- 1/ ÅI ' , ~f/ / Æv!./ L. \'~ ~ 4. ,t:-- ,-\\ C'," '\(' ..' ,-,.(\,/.:/,-", ; ,_\._, I " . ___ - I '-\,' t\\ '\. ,\,1_ "''- \ v 'J.j-~ M (,)cl( ~\J LÜ1~\ C ~ h , , J \-)0 Î' ct· ~~V:(fl(-( - 3').0 ,"? ,(ì . LL~¡,\..<.u() (~. I - If - ,." C ,,'.1 " ,; \ l'" +, ( \ <:;-u,..) -V\LX-k" Ë I 'C " Lv- 5 ........, .., 0'. \ '1 '<" ... . ..... I ì_ ,,~'-, *'.... \ ~_....µ d (-, .::¡ - (. .~- If' V1.. ,....--\ t..{ þ ....---- ~"h '...... "-', "/ 5 _c:..._" - 5- L-'~,J{êWIe.c.J C; r, l -S-6/· '--/6'"f...9/1-i ~~- I ('--:-::'~ \'J<"-'- \- 'ì""~ ' _\.,(.1- h l~1 .. /-LI'Î \( Y ~'\c v( t'c.J ,r . ')"" ,'" '-' .: .,'\ ~ If" It // ;z::;.-:- . c? /vt- I / c:;:.....-.--, /I "..-- (-/ i ,__~_;.r""':'-::_,~_-,...,_ ~_____ ..., ") (~ -l--- é.-,c.¿-~r le'1 c/',::L+.- /#, ,I o <-:-çç- ,:~/ 1 '." _/.--'- --- .' -./;.-¡,..-(- J rl -yc..... - '-'-'" I ¡I f ' L' ;, ///'/_'1 -' -,'_ . -ul'IL ___ - '~¿~4L<_;~' t:Jk-~J¿/. -_>~?/j'r ¡tj~0, - (¡(.,I)!/ ?t;~,- / (/./~ ., I ¡ ! 1)1" ·-i/ . ÙiI) './LJ¡·("- '~l \.:.:..:, -L.....'l'l . ". - ). / ";, . I. /-'. ! L-0~'./ ¿ __- 3c I r¡ ,;-733:1- , ( " I / , '1 , I t.' ,:!?b/ - ý.P ~-7 ?~ iZl-, 'cy-J:i)'j' 3/ ):-) 0 (:J S'~. - < t{\ '-(i~~ , /l5f / , ; - :. -; ',f-- s-,-/(r,.J_W tJI.-<-'" J.t 7 6,( - f rS'/ _ _ '1, /" Y6/ .~. '-) j IWMluú [b( t./f.l'61 s> ?1' I ") ~ , .:)/1...... _. ,--') , , \-",~ , , 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 '-"' "-rtI Petition for Resol~orth Hutchinson Island FDOT BridgeA ratr & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pie-ce and the Commissioners of S1. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metro ,olitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the Fehabilitatioo & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # 2 -1I¡Î/1 êARP~rvT£(l 1.9JJC-" SAC62IVO t2JJ FT f-JErLŒ) Fl3i../9J{ ." ~'~~'L€<).t}-J ~~ 3;';;L 0 rJ ¡c~ ¡ ¡4. ,d.£- ,rU/l.-CL, Y Á }'-! if rd.uv xL~vu 3; .). 0 (I) ~lf ( t4. J~. ~.j k 3'¡Ç; ÝJ - ! <t!1lÃ1Y\ ëL.- ?-;}Dc So 7" Si. l ð f 1L « 7. {¡, f'.e ;( <¿ (I 59iX"~ JàC\1IP ~//'1/VI .SI~C ;1/17/'/-1 ;1 if :}~91/1 /97-Vc.u- (~ 31 )... () /Ill- / 11 ¢'t /uLv<- j( J 1./9 5): / . ,-:;¡ G, .é ¡/;'c i:<::~ 6/ .:1.:0 // A I A I' " . /. V ,"'" ~~ ¡J . .!3U 9 CJ l)~J9JlV\."ÛQÂe¡C 6(;;¿~ ¡J;f(1ffIæ)~ /7 . ,'/ /J -<'I -¡ /7 /1 / .-, / ,-;? ç;..; .. ::5 v::/c..J -ed..--...;J--t::..-L- .~ ---'\ (./ J (/ /7 I~J ('¡.:Z: ~ --' ¿- - ;. 3/20 ;1/ // - 1- 4- ;:;T /~c. , ~/ ¿ð IV: /illl- :¡ i 7-}¿A/Y-, 3 4 5 6 I i--L~, --f? /u¿.,~ LZ... / 1/ /i/': ,/IIi) (1o(fI[il~(¡h'sc ) I 2-0 AJ I A I 11.- -A J'irJ'3 FI t9~ ,. -:::> ~ ¡J ^~ /1_ i:j:::-./ ___ J - -¡- :::> / .r l'-r :o.i/5 p; ?Ä~t. 31,)0 ------ . -v7 //; ~:::!:T/L-/Ô.J ':'-¡7/y~¿ CL /~~?/0~¿ '-3/R¿1 1/;9.1/.) ß,q~K'e.3Y·7:''Y; ~'\-."-\ \. ~\. (' \,~ ~ h.\ \. ,~ 3/ at) JJ -J'J } A f=l ) '-t ':B n ·,ll'<:rc~ I ~ f' 'à.. '--'" ......, Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT BridgelLp!iI & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the "":ommissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of 81. Lucie County to pc ,s resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Phone # Address 2 !/t? '-ð-/77 .j /}..o 1-' /t/lt -J()tf-S L/¿. f-/735 3 I\, (I 4 ". ~ '\.U!.....-. / 'J////y/j/Ij YJ/t¿t \:<,/-/-f-l-J 5 6 7 8 9 10 II (\ 11 12 ~ ~~<~<.L1C4':- &JJ- .j~ f'~/1 ¡;;L: \, ~ ) '....\}"\ I -'~i )J~ý ?;~- '~(rð . '" ,/ Ø/ð 3 {(~ II b cJ / J ¡, ¿ ¿I ( )' .30 I S ;30 IS ~('-/-¿ /1" I 13 14 15 16 17 19 'i:J-3 , ~ ~ Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FOOT Bridg~pdl[ & Replacement We the undersigned hear by J"etition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie ( .:mnty to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # I .- IJOS" S .1 . t 1tA.....:tzA1~ / . ,"" -, 2 L " -f ~h I . .,---. .-. \~~\...v,-,---,,---, s ¿h L .;\,'\.\J\ 11. CJ ~ S" - 3/,),~' ff /1/// .L / /·i.L.:A_ -.----' \--; S->i ^' 1. 0 I So 3 4 ¿;, / ,.~ /., ¿7':;'" 5. 3/.)~ 1/,,4 /7''cj; /:-.~"'- ]0<-/(/. -~::-'::"?'L ~ ,L¿"'-?ÇJ ~ /00 s~ 7 .'. CJJrJl d/cu (1ý, ) 'a:,¿ ? I t) c Ai A ( 11 /I 't'{) J- 5 6 7 " Ü.;.:.tC-c:.. \ ,,'le ," v - \ - ./ '--' -"<-- I p.. J " \) / ~ J / / (Jl/1, l (' ',/)./ ~,r¡- 4. ,4- t. ';)Î J fl. 'rz. rf -1.1_ I [1" /, " / :J 1 ~ \Sfh..LS~ ·I)\r"" l=i , \ SOb ¡¡AlA (ðO:J.... .~/.v IV If /r'r+ 9 o..~ ~ . ,. .-' " \ctC c;: 8 9 10 \ 11 12 13 14 I5 I6 17 19 '-"" ......., Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Comrr;ssioners oftbe City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resl lutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to I\1P0. Name Address 1 æL<..---.;:z .:l'-OON ..;.. FY: t9...~. £="/ "-........ Phone # (5(1) ¥6S-SS<l1/ 2 3 4 5 /)/;'C;'o 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 ~/-;J SF 46.;;; 5'{¡/- 'f{g~-SI;J q 15 17 19 . /.AþÎlIf/ ~( j . i.:F;y ç; 1.(/1 '--" J: ,f'Y'" r 1'fV1' CCP' .' ¡- NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! ...-i/ ~J -r /1 /....).2 ~_¿. ~ L\.-.J-J Ú~ . '-" Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FOOT Bridge Repair & R~lacement (Replacement means a fIXed bridge) We, the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Comnússioners of St. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FOOT for the reha.biJitatioß.&.TP.fII~l'.l"ment of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name Address Phone # ---- 1. "W'"" :~l. . t...,r, ,I '/ ¿; .;' . À,," ¡; ...., ~ ¿ ......"!:i ';7 - / '-'_~L'ú,; ,";:1 --:; , .. j' - <liefi. :.:/';;,.;..t'_.... " , 2. 3. C (,"",,,.<1 C? ~~~c<£{ "J L7 j\' .A /~ - ....- f'o>, )..- T b~.....o 4. 5. 6. ( Ä.4IL1 e.< 1Vl. Culfl e- 7. ')/(,1 I~! ~·IA·" '602;Ft~J..2Ac.l 5'bl ~'5-l2.37 .. ~. ~ 8. 9. 10. . ' r- /1 ^ 11. I :z~ ~ ;Jl:~¿ 12. Ú~ 1/W"":' '7. L· /"'" / If.. .. .' ···f...... '. _ - ...... t:/ / df'Cc/ #/,# ~b?-,Â'f6¡:- 13. 14. 15. c;,. r6-S" f¿() Ff -.£ICo7 N' f\ï~*'l1~ ~b l' - ~ ~-.J { 16. 17 j. "::."__/ :. ...., -. '. /.-~-- ~'-;;;-. _ '" , --.#... _ . ~J ,.~,..... "y'. f'~' , /f.... '. " .~ 1- Co- _ ¡~ IS. ~ ~~. '~IL,'ttl¡;¡ ~"'1C1 :~ '""2 , , . - - -" - ,~ ./ 7 j .) /~-~)( J....-t-l.-l..'l..-( (L~ 7f1r;¿Aí¡;N!'I~ <;~~1\10~ 0(ieH11 -; L.;:'-:" c'-l'''/~--- r¡Ir-.J(,!l"Y'v Sìk(~ j/);j, I' \' L' f ( /7, ) J ì il, , l .A .f.;'DŒ ç/ -.:-/--:{ /,-~:':"I¿¿{ ~ 2-3 7l'</¿j¿~/C ¿I{.{i'-;~J3{£ C~ ~~)...., - (/'J !:;''J . k~ ~.2-' -;-, :> r-<,~/C), ~/ / /' . j'::.. I.t'. ! '7· ',' / .£/ d¿:¡ /.' /.! J '! a)",.,;; , ,~ ; -j;;,. ,;('/,,1. ). é:.C'....:...u --t. ._.(..., "(: 7' "/ /L- /T / /- /~ ') J / :.... / ' / /, ~'I ;") /.. / C .. .~ ';Z:~~( /.; v, " . ~ L.i:"'~'" . .. ;_.//)'/ ///~/, . -;7-;( ~Ø/7"'-<J1' , . _,;¡, /Jrr' 4;/-. 9~/ -'h/' .. ~. ..... . '..tí::,-~ ,/.:' t:..uf·.f:í...../5'i 07/1///,11- (JUált#tt/r.:-;;:"<:>.. L)gf--~J-;b ::-tL,_. /.d-ß ;Ál.Jt¿",ì J]([ L/J rI) _j~ ~::~i~,L +{ {--/~5:.3 ~ North Beach Homeowner's Association Members Present - Date /~'/;¿/,-' / I : -'t \ -= Pi::.-~ C J+k1c; i 1i!;J 771 ;'-- \. ¿:: f .J L_ I I....) Name Unit or Address /J, 'J' IKe:... L/l-¿L- jLc i :':'(:.·'k',- , ,-' ,-~,' , í ;)_ ~,~,¿¿ L.~:}, " ' ,-", "/-~~"~ ;./,:'" "'.' - I é u ,<-,-,-_ Ilu·[ te-ri-~ ,,{¡ ¡" I { ¡, GÏr',i . ¡ .. ..1 "r';-d :," t.LC/ ,_ 1....... .->- _ f::,/\' / f~ _~-'7....i¿-·~-'1-t.'--....... 'J' /" '---r::' è '::¿t.....:-' L L I-.: Cu,:... --r- ~3A-/' ~ L··'" '" ---.- [, j- L~~ kl.ß- LL~(. .j ~J;--L-J +7~<-/--'-L/' ,j " / r I y' ·'~~,1'" .-.\.-'--;-"- -'.:'"'-- , ---,- / ~ ç."L._ r'~_ ' ( . ---i'~', .;) '--4 \~(·I\-:C·""" .-.:,;.....: II (.. ,I h~~~¿ 0"-./1 (\<-'-U'~ c.~, .ý // ~_:/lf~~-r1 fl J II /' 1/ .Î Li I J '- . J"ì f\ cT' I T 1C.;':'-~IC;I-'V¡ ~-"r \~.-\... (,,-<,-'i..- 1/ ,. Ii ¡ J!--:iL. /-" I -'..- /) y'l.. _. __ /1 ~.'1 /-- .., {I"1' , i I ¥/c;t írHtl ......., / ,t'~~.....¿· )/i Telephone # */ . Ç/t <fb 7i, (j. f}ý fc ¿ /f/Y- 7f¿ 6 L'~'-';"/L' f ." ,\ '-'IV 1 < ;--", ..... ^I (. /',-~ ('( {~ // 1L¿' -s-LfcG // ~cr:.-:.c' ~~í7- -- -- ,/..; "'h <-/¿,f ¿~6g..5- .yr;::y -¿J.f?// 1/(/]- '~<"J / , / ;/ /{ v '-'" ......", Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDlff Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Plann .Ig Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North,Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent~ach b.Qdy to MPO.' ~{/tU\1./'v~,j,¡P'(' ~/r/Î Õ( ~L ~ JIÏ'~ul. ~-j,\ ~--;: }U- ; Name Addres~ (i Phone # I ~ Q U.lfl\, ~ .¡\M(.> ~,...o 0 tJ f~\ Yr ~J;O t if p,~ 5% -q ~ ,; ~ " r-'l? ....q ';r~ 2 ):,tLo--O J ÿ~ ~ï.-() ~ f'.\' ~. \~- .,. ·(7 '\ \.. 1. " 4' '~~Ì<..- ).'\t",,"^,':''' J1.. DC U' ~\l-\. 10 ¡¡î fí ~itë:"h£ \ìl.\u!\.. ~lU:"\~^ 1¡'ò.O 0 V· A,\(\ t7c5 V\ f~E'~(\~ ,"\þr; ·fb'')t H~\, .9,~\ 3 4 5 ...-~. ~"'-V(·; ,~._, , r , -do>=- ç 'f {I , Ùt ü: 1./, (t'O:"¡ ~.,.}....4 .-.->-' 6 ér?<. 'E ./ ?/~ - ð'56&' 7 ~..~ h j../-{1I 3;¿Of) AI AM 1/ //¿; ç; /"T l1é1f'~e 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 ~ \~ ~~/~ t?/! ~~6!.-v\..-"'" NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement (Replacement means a fixed bridge) We, the undersigned here by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of S1. lude County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name "'~ . r r' 1." , UW\i Address ~ 3 q;c. i'\» \ ~ ~(,,, 3 Phone # 4(. à¡ - "") '\ ¡,¡ ç 2 " . .' , ... I.) -". rl" '( (r,l < \o.~ \', !. (,:, \ \. '\ 3. ,':, 'v\." ,. v,,· . ., J ,; ,c r_ /, /' 4 i\'¡" :,..', ,.' . .~ ; ,Sf'¡" I ! 1·\...... ;'/·'\1,'........ r:=:. // ) 5, I·~~-~á-V"-- d ;j ,/ // -? II " "J'j, 1 7;' -- / , L/-t,.. 0 !J 5' J~ 2_ 6.. f . /1 ")_ ./ '\ ;...' / - (L..\ ' 7. ,., /"--:"-),--1.-1.--"1.1\ I{ { \ v( , I 9, L. Cr' lj / ¿; - ,-t;. -/j-/ (I 8. /1 :J c:~ L/ II #~CS- {ì-7t/3/ lO. ;' , '/-"'¡"_A -1 ~ .'v",_ ., L/·o i -... -., 11. 12. , I. ~ . ,:..·-....~11(;.:,;~ ~ .' r :_ ':.-..... 1...4'-- '( -!i 7(/ :::=... 'I /. ç ,-' <,--:;:- ! :t 'i "') 7.5 f \ ~ 13. ~/__'I,___~.: ~:--=-=-~~ 1\ I-f ;;;S-C '-t- ..:...:.... - " () g '- ~ ::, ~ /; - " , : :,-:;.~ (,' . H. ,.~ / ,_I :/' ./' ,1',' :;... ~. {.,. .~ 1- -;;; Ii> ".- .J J LJ I4. I. ,. 15. - . -, f/,;L 16 ) 'i ......,,: tv:~f-,...../ o"'J-1 NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement. (Replacement means a fixed bridge) We, the undersigned here by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name 1. 2. .., ;). 4. 5 6. 7. ; ~ ~. 9. 10. j/ 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Address Phone # ~ --/ -- ...;. <..."- _Ii---L ? " "' _ ...."{ ,~.-/ - , i,' I -I.' 'I ,/, ¡- I r- .; I -. \~ \"'- '- " .,/. ".., .,:"-' .;.:.-,.r , , :-J / ~ ::: / .L/¿;;. --, ----- Y'0 c; - c ¡ \-. '-'-' > ¡~ . ''--.. ...(/ri i}··1 l ~ ""- / /-/ I ,...-i.. ~ ~~ J.;{~ (,\.-\ t;:. \ .:_" 1-'- ., ) l. --"7 ¡,-. '7 /c..," "l ..J.; ì I J \ / .--1.- / , .-;<.-- - , '......'-'-/ .-~ . ',' (/ . I ~ / .. ~ r :. , ,..,- /l//) l; .) ..J./,. t ,-/., <" ~., .-.~ 1·,/~-. 0< ...-~, ,..- "Ill- .:.(;,;- ~ ......., NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & R~lacement (Replacement means a fixed bridge) We, the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of S1. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FD01' fOf the rehahilitation.&.repla.cementofthe North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name Address Phone # 16/f/4 I!:ô~ 2~J rIJ)'jµhL.J 3~"'¿ ,::t j,¿ 4.~O L 1/ð Cl¿J ~.;f /A- J.;)oo rJ, 1/ J) 0ðìl ,1'1/4 4//-} ;,  U""\) h.<J If I r+- \ ?,6Ç~ ¡.it!. -/:{S~ , t/ C..f - <1 j' .2. -~-, 5. . . ';e,j\\ 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ]l. ]2. 13. 14. 15. 16. Lj G('- t Zr:) I (loG -T) 0 . . , .215/ll/l1VA./4 Dtê ..2( 5 /I14~/J Il De. 4b7- 9¿¿f ~ "'" NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & R~lacement (Replacement means a fixed bridge) We, the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of 51. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOi for the rehabilitation-&.replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name Address Phone # I. ()/¡7~1 &u11,11JZ4'1 2~~ b"'M-J 3. C;<ll,,,Q, S"'l~;-- :t.:L1 ~~~' ,r-':? 4. tA'v~ tÝ . ~L J-.L~~ ) ~ 3fJ ..J.e ~~,<.... J-f. P :~~~¿~ ~~. /I'I~U~ tit, r p, '7&s'¿'/7! ~c <; 1/7 tLk(,v~J, o..Vl!. 3-( ~'Y -C) 9 (3 '!J fD5" - 1337 7't /-f.- 1 RC¡7 jb-; - 'o/~ t( I( r 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. ·-7 ~' . ) /~ ----- ~ '-' Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support (' " the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the filial '1'. .' !II & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to l\1PO. Name Address Phone # 1 .~/) ~ ./ :;r::: f[¡J::,! /~;,p;; S¿Cr,~ l 'rr¡au.~<æ1Ÿ 5 c ò ¡ Jtf. ~. t. .~ ~ &~~ £~tL 5"Ð I N 'Á;¿~ L ~-J~ y~c.¡- b b Sr 2 ::;~~:~9 3 4 'ire ( -&702 5 ';2 ð S 1'1 /I) ò -~ 3" 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 3/50 AJov+h A-IA FeN! PI'€YC~ {FI-... 3'-tQ47 ''1' .-:+- _/ '-"'" ......." Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Comnússioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in suPp~~.~tropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the reh..L:t·__li<Rl~fthe North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to rvrPo. Name Address Phone # 2 r~ ;:¿ 132 j ') /v' .I "?t¿ê1" .l0..-B~ -?.:íL/ 1,,::-0"'- fl ../---wVl vrr~~~' ¡+- Co (Ì ¿j I;' v M' ;J ,1;! A -i-J . l/lU¡(~·1f{j? t1~;';{:'~!/1L --rr-8o)" (/'~ðf.,.a ì !¡ t)- C.JI! y~~ ~c,ol AI('4,~Y L/fç~u;s~ '~~~) CJ~ ~,"~ð d. ~(bh.-,,-'l'fç 'Ør..<...l;L"j ú c/¿d.z-) -:p ¡J ~c:; cj- ~7Ò- 9¿; De.- . tit; \ I~ ~ b - ()J.-~ &. /lol. fJ C¡0/-l~ð/ 4g9- 6~LS 161 r-3£:) y¿ 4'--7 3> ; s~ 3 4 5 6 I¡ù -}l3ò 5' Q¡r--!l¡ q:rJ Vis-oJ¡; 4¿,/;i - "Z£&f 7 8 9 I~O to 10 ~'\o~<\c..<:.~ ~~ '''5 c~ - \0 \ '-/ c., ý - 66 tf "z I 3 {) / ;;'6, <.f-& .-: 0 51! 11 12 13 14 15 16 &0 3 #f:6Jç !A~L) . I 17 19 I err; v 3/SCJ 0o{-th fðy:r Pç,<¿¥C'e / A-IA- Ft. 2:/"{Cf~1 .. . . ~ ....." .!. ," NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & R¡:placement (Replacement means a fixed bridge) ,tp We, the undersigned hear by petition the Comnússioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation.&.replacem.entofthe North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Address Phone # .5J-B', ~L(j["ð-1r P.lU~ 5&/-YbÝ- /.f'/S- 13:11 /lb~: -Waif" 71r~ie Ç¿1-4~~- ~91g ,-,~ 15::-\ (J:- "/", fJøµ (t . ;Fb /- ¡f? s: 1'"z6j <;(o/ 04f~ cr ::J~t-./ -4>(ýJ/'j' ~: :S?:!J..~ 7 L, 6<; tY,£fj~··.: 5) ,JI 1¡/ll-~.AJ~ If -2 43 '8 jycx.. r '¿-c . - 'f sS Cw7 "Y /'Y1..ôy~~ r!!.vv . ó-¿ / - ~b(; ~ oý(J7 ~¿a r!.j ... - ,-' Gy:. ~,'~:- f - :, 08 },.¡.? 8. 9. 10. \¿5 ~ ~d- C), j' ,.[ '1 ~I hi ~~þ ŒuJ:"ll/ ~f:> ;¡ Š L }/1¿'!f7/PlJ'lJ 11. V1 ;¡ 12. ~ 4-~ b - ~ 5"g5"" 13. \- < 1\ I r ¡ . í). \ (n¡"il'i I!I 'F;R (~ - \{JJ - ~): l, ~ W/4tiN ~UL-L- fL~<)e- fUI s¡-J'i:::"~r T6 'r HE f3 f-ì C J<. ,,¿~'Í þfiY For S C~N/t1JG:,-" .. I ;j¡l/~ NORTH BRIDGE PEIITÎ~ Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Re.placement (Replacement means a fixed bridge) We, the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation.&.replacementofthe North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name Address Phone # L( bI - 55Ç- I %Db ~ 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. (""" . ì i J / \_/ '-" ~ Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement We the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. Lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the etropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for p!~nt fthe North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, WI I be sent by each body to MPO. Name Address Phone # 2 /701/ )) /r; 3 JOC) ~ tLi ll"ë.- N 4 5 6 7 8 9 ~ /--., ~-;;I1.j I'Y?;:Z/~ í é'~'t <L- /~í) J /¡í ~ /f~~"~ ~ . ~g-j~~ ~))~M /205 J çZu~ -d.ì}~.rYil/ 4oJ./ Ai Å/1Æ' bY"YlA ø'V1/1- 100:+ ¡J - L¡(IY-3SG-1 '"it- 7- /C;Ç,O -5- C" ¿./ - 'Y(i y;:"-- ¡. I ;.:..,../, Ih,,/ ¿. .. ~ I , -7-;;,1/ ryf/O +J9'~¿O 10 10 j/r.JZ-#'~' J -vrf~~ /LGj'a.-L (VU2/ ..L/~b - 331 S- 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 :3 l $0 00'fi-~ FOYI (f¡\QYCe/ ........ , _..1 / ~., /t/ ð0( It.. vP ,~¿ ¿I, . k, ¡.!....¥- ieQ. L '" - ......" . NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement (Replaeement means a fIXed bridge) We, the undersigned here by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the :MPO. Name Address Phone # 1. Sli .'7S7 '2.:.. ¡. .... .J. 4. ' 5... -. ~ ' '\.''''"'- 6. j " ''10 '<. ::-'ì t.~ ' ...} ... ~; . ,1. ^ ',' . ,J J Þ·~}'" ~lj-:;'''.J /!J , ,.... '... "~ .. \0..-' ::.. ; .(' 7,,' i__ .¿ F~ - /. 'r. .1 ., ..~...... ----~ 8. ... :~', ì ~ ¡ \'~,. \ .... .~¿-?J c.,/ 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. , ~:t. .r·~·t,""·1 [ ~ / 1- /"_ ~ ;:~:'_~_~_'~ J J.~_~ ... ," NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & R~lacement (Replacement means a fixed bridge) We, the undersigned hear by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St. lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT fOt' the rehabilitatio~&.repIacementofthe North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Name '1. Address $155" J~ /1/ ¡:; Phone # \;. ~ : I 'I ~/. L/& '-I '- ~"å'709 .I'~ 2.' j's lfb6.., ~ 2.l¿, '11£- f3 96- b [. / ,~' ,f~ I ( 0 i.' / '-l -','_--J' L ( ¡ i ......,.. ! 2. :.J 0 ff ftJ 1-,:: Më-K r-/-r~ IV\I~'/\ ? II 3. jJ\) /J.l '" Ai'? J u f/C~-.sl$g ,1~,:,u 'H A fA. I I, Ii It 4. H. Þ\.. (a L l¡ NS Lly¡)íS~ kðl)lA ¿M " 5. 6. --t.ê /l ~(} if;, '- .,'-~ 7. \),\Jlf' SCl:\~t·'L:·¡r· "'-_ _t 8. Of! /J1¿ t-f-/Jtat';} , -. L. /'r J!-}/ . /. 9. tm..1·-.1 ~',_':' 7\ (...~..",:" t , r ( 1/ .( ,¡~. 'I '( / --.", 4) I: __ -- I.¡, :~. I I;' f' - i =- r (~' '~.. '.- ~ ~ I - -.:: {.., -;. ¡. . ~ 13. ~. L 11. II f L 'I6ð --' S"ð )/3 It( 61i -" 12. 14. _--Jt!.NJi: ..¡,.:r@~ WÐ P.íH ( IV' "'-0 I~I ~ ~ J-~ <Y' If ~"7 ~_q5'1ð t..i /'" c- ;-¡'i:: (. / / ¡, ü '-~ 4".. ... . 15. ~ , J... / i1 J ~ Lf~L.-Dq-bt 16. l. ....... -,L/" J "/'" /[/ csz / tL / :2-c'~_j)'L{,.L.;"LJ~ , NORTH BRIDGE PETITION! Petition for Resolution re: North Hutchinson Island FDOT Bridge Repair & Replacement (Replacement means a fixed bridge) We, the undersigned here by petition the Commissioners of the City of Fort Pierce and the Commissioners of St lucie County to pass resolutions in support of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) request to FDOT for the rehabilitation & replacement of the North Bridge on North Hutchinson Island. Such resolutions, after adoption, will be sent by each body to the MPO. Nam:,,+-:1:>,. :~,... 1. .:...JI¿! f ¡- ~ ':': \..' \\ \ .J - -' , . " 't' ,\. ¡"\ ~. 1 2. (~f:' IZl)! T ~J~ '; Ó I 3. _((.y,~N-i'-I..,·¡;-.-/ è ' -.' / / (A 'I .,' t I . ( t...J} ( ," / :;j, 'L ....--..: II ~/¡t. ,~ : ......v' , 5. - v.0/.r, :,. ,I'. . .1·: ~J'''.J 1);-'("...· '... , , Address Phone # ,~ .....- . I . .' : r--- . \ .'Y A ~ t \ l"'-í I -- .;' ('-:..I-~ _:- i i- ;~~ ~ ~1(!U_~ J 1) -,.:;. :)->¡ 7 4. Å I /1 it ') ( '-':;' -----'/-. "j' !" I, ., ì.' 6\r.;;.= Cl J ,ve:.. ,,(,.'/-. ~. , ;,r \ . '" . q::,\~\ 7.''':' H, .~~·;C!~0N'~C- )l))",_)J-., ---~ 8. Ri(/1!~R{) b();;'J~)</:¿¡1(; IØ 4 Ib f) 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. ·'-" .""", CONSE ITEMS .++ .++ .++ . + . BOARD OF couNTÝ COMM /SIONER~ MEETING 01/25/02 'P"'ABWARR FUND 001 001140 001143 001262 001268 001269 101 101003 102 102001 105 107 107001 107002 107003 107126 111 112 120 122 126 -' - j 139 140 140001 160 183 183001 183004 185002 316 316001 352 382 390 401 418 421 441 451 461 471 491 505 505001 f='l '"-' rñ),Œ.,W ~ W Œ r:~ WAR':~ ::::E #:~~:_~~O:2 TO ~t~~~o~~ 1002 ¡ WÞE FUND SUMMARY CO ADMIN. OFFICE ~ '-' TITLE General Fund Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 Manatee Protection Plan II/ Fl Fish 01/02 Haz Mat DCA Grant FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/Loéal Option Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-BOO Mhz Oper FDOT DUI Specialist Grant River Park I Fund River Park II Fund Th~ Grove Fund Indian River Estates Fund Southern Oak Estates Lighting Pine Ho~low Street Lighting MSTU Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund Palm Grove Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 County_Capi tal Transportation Capital SHI Wastewater Treatment proj Fund Environmental Land Capital Fund Treasure Cove/Ocean Harbor S Cap Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance FQ~d Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Agency Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES PÞSROLL 591,956.22 1,159.68 2,625.77 140.00 396.82 342.40 65,662.44 1,050.00 20,115.83 1,450.23 3,376.36 235,563.28 171.44 10,173.05 14.50 6,645.28 2,584.95 517.00 153.14 862.61 110.84 327.91 106.43 664.44 12,690.44 61,378.39 3,127.53 1,544.68 774.22 685.78 1,310.83 53,006.75 73,313.10 7,218.39 500.00 33,354.27 57,788.76 30,112.99 686.22 5,283.54 709.31 11,653.23 3,131. 94 10,421.44 257,455.68 663.23 6,998.71 9,069.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 í1 0.00 ''\ ~ 0 . 00 ~\\ ¡:-:i 0 . 00 ~ 0.00 ~ ~:~~ \l) 0.00 \\r \~U¡ Y ,,~\ o. 00 'f 0.00 \ I 0.00 \\ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,287.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,589,049.82 9,287.13 01/25/02 P"'Z\BWARR FUND 145 TITLE '-" '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...." ....I WARRANT LIST #17- 19-JAN-2002 TO 25-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 17,700.53 17,700.53 PAGE PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 01/25/02 FZABWARR FUND 184 TITLE '-' '-" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ....", ...., WARRANT LIST #17- 19-JAN-2002 TO 25-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 822.49 822.49 PAGE PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 "'"' '-' 'WI ...., 01/25/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE F7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 17- 19-JAN-2002 TO 25-JAN-2002 buND: 001 - General Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00278324 12204100 Cueto, Leo 1,702.50 00278528 12204064 Zlinkoff, Norman 1,702.50 00279298 12205882 Hyatt 645.00 00279880 12207752 Ditch WitchCTrencher Inc 8.75 FUND TOTAL: 4,058.75 , . "'" '-' 'wi ""'" 01/25/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE F'7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 17- 19-JAN-2002 TO 25 -JAN-2002 t'uND: 107 - Fine & Forfeiture Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00278897 I2205583 Clerk Circuit Court Martin Cou 14.00 FUND TOTAL: 14.00 01/25/02 V'7ABWAR.~ FUND 001 001140 001143 001262 001268 001269 101 101003 102 102001 105 107 107001 107002 107003 107126 111 112 120 122 126 .., _ J 139 140 140001 160 183 183001 183004 185002 316 316001 352 382 390 401 418 421 441 451 461 471 491 505 505001 1'='1 '-" ' TI TLE ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #17- 19-JAN-2002 TO 25-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY EXPENSES General Fund Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 Manatee Protection Plan II/ Fl Fish 01/02 Haz Mat DCA Grant FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/Local Option Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper FDOT DUI Specialist Grant River Park I Fund River Park II Fund The Grove Fund Indian River Estates Fund Southern Oak Estates Lighting Pine Hollow Street Lighting MSTU Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund Palm Grove Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 County Capital Transportation Capital SHI Wastewater Treatment proj Fund Environmental Land Capital Fund Treasure Cove/Ocean Harbor S Cap Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Agency Fund 591,956.22 1,159.68 2,625.77 140.00 396.82 342.40 65,662.44 1,050.00 20,115.83 1,450.23 3,376.36 235,563.28 171.44 10,173.05 14.50 6,645.28 2,584.95 517.00 153.14 862.61 110.84 327.91 106.43 664.44 12,690.44 61,378.39 3,127.53 1,544.68 774.22 685.78 1,310.83 53,006.75 73,313.10 7,218.39 500.00 33,354.27 57,788.76 30,112.99 686.22 5,283.54 709.31 11,653.23 3,131.94 10,421.44 257,455.68 663.23 6,998.71 9,069.77 GRAND TOTAL: 1,589,049.82 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,287.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,287.13 \"'-. ...I 01/25/02 F'?:ABWARR 1:0 uNO : 001 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD VOID LIST# 17- 19-JAN-2002 TO 25-JAN-2002 - General Fund PAGE 1 CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00278324 12204100 Cueto, Leo 1,702.50 00278528 12204064 Zlinkoff, Norman 1,702.50 00279298 12205882 Hyatt 645.00 00279880 12207752 Ditch Witch Trencher 1nc 8.75 FUND TOTAL: 4,058.75 '-". -....J 01/25/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 2 P7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 17- 19-JAN-2002 TO 25-JAN-2002 t-uND: 107 - Fine & Forfeiture Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00278897 12205583 Clerk Circuit Court Martin Cou 14.00 FUND TOTAL: 14.00 02/01/02 FZABWARR FUND 001 001007 001139 001140 001143 001147 001217 001265 001269 001271 001809 101 101001 101002 101003 101006 102 102001 102104 104 105 , ...., 001 107002 107003 127 140 140800 160 183 183001 183002 183004 183106 185002 310002 310003 316 395 396 401 418 421 441 451 461 471 "". ,. ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD """ WARRANT LIST #18- 26-JAN-2002 TO 01-FEB-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE EXPENSES General Fund General-Energy Efficiency Fund FHA Transportation for 21st Century Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 NOAA/FDCA Adopt-A-Beach DEP-Regional Attenuation Facility TDC Planning Grant FY01/02 FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 DHR-Historical Museum Grant-In-Aid SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Grants & Donations Fund Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper Pine Hollow Street Lighting MSTU Port & Airport Fund IRL Taylor Creek Restoration SFWMD Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Domestic Relations Hearing FYOO-03 SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 Impact Fees-Parks Impact Fees-Public Buildings County Capital River Branch MSBU Capital Lennard Road 1 - Roadway Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin Building Code Fund 190,391.72 322,593.09 33.16 670.06 1,632.39 44.79 2,750.00 50.45 152.26 132.56 4,151.54 361,183.85 2,655.00 450.00 1,748.93 8,452.00 11,630.83 4,009.57 93.82 13,203.05 3,225.55 228,305.95 8,056.48 2,199.12 235.01 333.10 5,395.71 8,325.52 4,036.16 2,065.62 257.49 125.00 348.56 6,312.48 183.12 13,212.14 48,660.00 129,477.64 67.26 7,105.18 95,139.81 10,129.62 1,464.18 26,936.69 24,205.10 11,808.70 14,888.22 2,907.98 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 417,180.41 0.00 433.62 3,113.29 1,204.62 0.00 0.00 673.17 1,188.80 1,768.90 1,188.80 104,035.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,050.71 4,325.37 1,226.40 0.00 2,168.01 56,976.85 746.24 29,544.27 0.00 0.00 8,968.01 0.00 5,229.73 3,666.71 1,115.38 0.00 2,874.61 0.00 2,519.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,520.27 21,360.39 188.31 3,954.87 893.08 8,830.82 4,990.64 22,011.46 02/01/02 FZABWARR FUND 505 505001 611 615 625 """ . ; ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ....",. WARRANT LIST #18- 26-JAN-2002 TO 01-FEB-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE EXPENSES Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Impact Fees Fund Law Library 656.02 5,717.84 482.71 37,951.08 6,547.03 GRAND TOTAL: 1,632,791.14 PAGE 2 PAYROLL 2,745.86 0.00 3,273.88 0.00 0.00 802,968.85 .~ ~ ~ 02/01/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 F7ZŒWARR VOID LIST# 18- 26-JAN-2002 TO 01-FEB-2002 FlJI--ID: 001 - General Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00280378 12208824 Anyplace Anytime Transportatio 640.00 00280895 12209756 Walsh Environmental Services I 12209756 CHECK TOTAL: 140.00 700.00 840.00 FUND TOTAL: 1,480.00 '-" ..., 02/01/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD FZABWARR VOID LIST# 18- 26-JAN-2002 TO 01-FEB-2002 ~v~D: 505001- Property/Casualty Insurance Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00280341 I2208428 Team Auto Glass Inc PAGE 2 FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 251.80 251. 80 ~ ...; AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2 A DATE: February 5, 2002 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR { ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: (~~~i-~~ County Engineer SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: Approve Change Order NO.1 in the amount of $132,558.48 for the Indian River Lagoon Trace Phase fA and IB to incorporate plan modifications as required by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). BACKGROUND: The Indian River Lagoon Trace Phase IA and IB project was advertised for bid on February 16, 2001. In the interest of expediting the project, the decision was made to advertise for bids prior to having the permits in hand. The bids were opened on March 21,2001. On May 8, 2001 the project was awarded to Dickerson Florida, Inc. for $990,038.00. On September 24, 2001 the SFWMD permit was issued but included changes to the plans. On October 25, 2001 the FDOT permit was issued but also included plan modifications. The attached Change Order No. 1 address all of these requested plan modifications. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 101006-4116-563000-4904 (Transportation Trust/Impact) and 101002- 4112-563000-4904 (Transportation Trust/Constitutional). Funds in the amount of $94,804.00 will be transferred from the project reserves, 101006-4116-599330- 4904 (Transportation Trust/Impact). Funds in the amount of $81,394.00 will be transferred from the Juanita Ave. Sidewalk Improvement project, 101002-4112-563000-4700, 101002-4112-563005-4700, 101002-4112-563009-4700 and 101002-4112-599330-4700 (Transportation Trust! Constitutional), which has been completed. Funds in the amount of $39,221.00 will be transferred from the Oleander Bike Path project, 101002- 4112-563000-47002 (Transportation Trust/Constitutional), which will not be constructed at this time and will be replaced in the 2002-03 CIP budget. PREVIOUS ACTION: The project was awarded to Dickerson Florida, Inc. on May 8,2001 in the amount of $990,038.00. '-' RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of Change Order NO.1 in the amount $132,558.48 for the Indian River Lagoon Trace Phase IA and IB, the transfer of $81,394.00 from the Juanita Ave. Sidewalk Improvement project, and the transfer of $39,221.00 from the Oleander Bike Path project which will be replaced in the 2002-03 CIP budget. ""'" COMMISSION ACTION: [x] County Attorney [xl Originating Dept. Public Works [x] Finance (Check for copy only, if applicable) CONCURR~CE: (I_~ AbsentDouglas Anderson County Administrator ¡~l ~~~~~t.B~~~~t ~ L/;J;d¡ 6d APPROVED [J DENIED [J OTHER (4-0) (Hutchinson \9v [ I Purchasing [x] Budget & Rev. Coor. ~'" \"\ :- 4-" I '-' --.--.----.- '-- -'- -'-- ;' . .J 1f0 rr: (i" fi' " "" .."., i f; '-~ L':l :' ¡i " IlJ ¡-.--.-. I ," ¡f¡Ji .MN 10m Ii L_ ... _.. .._._j CHANGE ORDER ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROJECT: Indian River Lagoon Trace Phase' One Sections A & B (name, address) . CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: No. 1 Er: [.:: ~ ~::r; ~ ;".J-: "'-'---.-----. INITIATION DATE: 11/28/01 TO (Contractor): Dickerson Florida, Inc. P 0 Drawer 719 Stuart, FL 33495 CONSULTANT'S PROJECT NO.: N/A ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: C01-QS-568 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A - Yes) CONTRACT DATE: S/8/01 SEE A lTACHED The original (Contract Sum) was ................................................................... $990,038.00 Net change by previous authorized Change orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $-0- The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was ............................................_.... $990,038.00 The (Contract Sum) will be (increased) by this Change Order. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $132,558.48 The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be ........................................ $1,122,596.48 The Contract Time will be (increased) by . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . (30 ) Days The Date of Subst~lOtiaf Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is: 4/13/02 Funds Available: Account Number The adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the Contractor for the work or changes defined in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments include the costs and delays for all work contained in the Change Order, including costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non- affected work under this Contract. Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract price or time as a result of increases or decreases in costs and time of performance caused directly and indirectly from the Change Order, subject to the current scope of the entire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor that the Change Order represents an equitable adjUstment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed. All work performed under this Change Order shall be performed in accordance with the contract specifications. 11/28/01 Date Approved: SI. Lucie County Public Works Deoartment SI. Lucie County Department 2300 Viroinia AVe.. Ft. Pierce. FL 34982 Addre Dickerson Florida. Inc. Contractor 11/28/01 Date Date P 0 Omw" 719 ~l33495 dfDw, /-/J.-Q~- By: Date By: Approved as to Form and Correctness County Attorney III Z o - ~ l1.I "/) ~ « z :> ¡:: () lU "/) lJ Z :> lJ :n « I: 1.. LJ :.> ::( J:: z :> :> ~ ::( ..J J:: LJ > 1::..... Z'lt ::(0::: _W :)0 .,.0::: -0 w C) tZ .2, « o:C D.:ü -.;;.~ ~~¡;~:~;f ¡,; (l o CI> Gí E' o ü tic; c , --.r cc- '7 u~ '§ -r- ¡¡: C Qj o1ií "'0 W .:.:"0 <.l CI> i5 ~ o D.: .8 « c .2 Õ OJ III :¡¡i¡~¡~¡i:j::~jjj !I ~!·Il::.¡.l:¡:l:¡ :;J 'õ "0 « S <.l ~ CI> ëJS o 0 üZ '-" oolc.;'ôõôooaao âC!oo~oo~oo~ Cf~i~~~~~~i~ Ñ~~~::UrÑ=N-~~ tI"t- !::!.'!!' '!! ~ !!" t!. VT tI't tit W. 88 å cO II) Ul '" '" <o~g~ "I:I'9l~"? 00 g~~ci~N a) M to IJ') fft~~~tl;; 00 00 u'Îci II) co ~"'- N ~ ~'" 8 g g .nulC 'O;f m.. :g II) Ñ tl'tt;;.". ~8 III . Ul 0 ~ '" - '" ~'" 00 N ..,. r-;-r:-r"-~'\1'(")!;:t-<O '7 ~ ;¡ ~ '" ¡¡ Iii ., ~ Æ "-,¡;; f! !! ;¡ :lO£"O"C' ¡j;,: ú.. ell ál ~~~.~~~ <e.....l-mm '" ~ « (0 ~ ...,. ~ Il( (J) r::. N ,.- åmôd,J,th ~lõ~ft:~~ LL LL LL LL « « >- >- « « « « « -l-J....JU)WWøCf.)WWwwUJ ~.~ o .D -=- '" Q, E 1 ~ ,:¡ '" tjl1:S ~ -; .5 ~.D'i I- .~ -g o E õ o is .E LL", 0000 0000 ~~~~ ~ggg 88 rti....: lòt:;¡ 11)" uf .. .. úì "- o ;¡: w~ "- :::: ~ {i fa :ii ..c ~ ~ :s 0:: 0:: Ü "~ 0 o ~ Þ ~~I-~ êiiw -Ie; a 0:::;:°00 q ,.~ 0 . ai -C""$cig"lif iñ~~",:C\!. òo"coi":¡g;:: N..N,,",__ fßo ~'1~"" 888888 Pi or-- "liÑ(')(')ui~gM~Ou) ~~~!~~~~~âa ~Wtl't.,.,.tllttl't tI't ---.....-- .... ggg co..... 0,.... I"- M 1lf'1- ori ««««««LLØ>->->- UJwwwww...J...JC/)C/)CI) OJ '" .D ~ £ "ii E .E iii ß-¡o æ 1:: 0"lJ"c >~Q) m ~ ~ i 3 ø > æ i ~ g "C > 0 -5 8 > .::: -o5:5'5"'u_'58 g¡~§~~~i1<~~~ ~~g~~~l~.i.i ~9<ñ-Bo-gc.cOO ~8."';".of~t!5.c~ _ D.. ~ Q:I~ iL CI) ~ & a: Üj ~ 8 '" '" ;¡ J]~ '" ü OJ - Iii !.. '" :¡¡ I- mm «m «NNNC co u;> u;> Il] 0 Ol ..,. å.n.n.ho ~~~~g .nlh ........ "'II) ««««m 'V M O'J N C"l OONOO f';I<}I~~N 'V"Q'~"Q'~ ~ð6~~ ~~~~~ « '" III '" N N N ~~:i g g 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡¡: u O/l o ..,. 0:: m -' I, !!!- OJ '0 IV 0, .D ::l CI) II ~ :¡¡ IV õí 11 '" '0 èijèij OJ .. ;¡ Qí o 0 0:: " o 0 U U Lt) N N '" N N '" III SOllla o ~ C'! 0 8 ~"'I"M!;jci (fJII'!.ClONM a"· N <of' Ñ ~ ~..¡¡;.. g~ ttz; II) g 8 ~tici N N '" ..:;!~ 00 II) ..,. III ON", "f ~~ Ul ~~~~~ .." ~ê g~ggg~ oolligl!!g ~ (i) t:; 0 N Q... ririri -Ñ: tß-~~t;;t:..... -I~ co g 0 ~ .0 III ~g:'J cñ~~ ~~tßo .. N o~ 00 ~~ "'~ o ...... f5 C\l Ul N :5 ~ . III ~:; ..", 0....8 ~~~g- ttt-NN<'i..5 tßo~;;~ 00 00 ~ 0 «i a¡ o 00 ON <Xi LLCI)LL«>->->->- ...J...J(J')W(/JUJClJUJ ~ .J!l E g .s "lií "¡;; :Š :£ CD .f: .Q II .~ -g E õ ~ .; '" .D :s ëU .5 ~ II l; '0 .Q ::l ~ .~ I ~ -g ~<II~ 'O"~o::= "- ~ ã: .2J û) -g-g~~gg~D.. ~~ ~~'~~~~i3~~'i ~1i.2lP..!- = '5~~ rom«o::o::~~()«~ m 5 :¡:; u OJ III mooc¡¡«g :h:btb~¿; LlfOì'õ°g III ¡::: « « ;i¡~'":'8l óo;bo ("') N N M ..,. Ill..,. o ..,. 0:: m -' , ~ (ij i~~~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ææ~ 'i OJ OJ 0:: Nl)'iþ :5 g g .~ m88ð m o ~ ~ tONNai CONN'V .... to Lt) I,() ~ ~ - '-' ...", AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C - 2b DATE: February 5, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS DEPT SUBJECT: Accept the project; release the retainage in the amount of $15,114 0 and make Final Pâyment in the amount of $15, 114.30 to Gerelco Electrical Contractors for the South County Regional Sports Stadium project. BACKGROUND: The St. Lucie County School Board received bids for the South County Regional Sports Stadium. St. Lucie County contracted with the low bidder to construct the stadium. Gerelco Electrical Contractors was contracted for Phase I to provide electrical service for the field lighting, the parking lot lighting, the scoreboard and flagpole, the bathroom, and the sanitary lift station. Under Phase II of the same contract, Gerelco Electrical Contractors provided electrical service to the Concert Stage for lighting and sound needs. Phase I and Phase II work has been co~ted. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Fund Nos. 316-0000-205100-79502, 001-0000-205100-79502, 301-0000-205100- 79502 and 310002-0000-205100-79502 (South County Regional Sports Stadium Accounts). PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board awarded the construction contract to Gerelco Electrical Contractors on August 15, 2000. Change-order No. 1 for Gerelco Electrical Contractors was approved by the Board on December 12, 2000. Change-order NO.2 for Gerelco Electrical Contractors was approved by the Board on August 14, 2001. Retainage reduction from ten (10) percent to five (5) percent for Gerelco Electrical Contractors was approved by the Board on October 9, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board accept the project; release retainage in the amount of $15,114.30 and make final payment to the contractor in the amount of $15,114.30. COMMISSION ACTION: [~ APPROVED [] DENIED [] OTHER (4::.0) (Hutchinson .I!Î/ [x] County Attorney It -<"' [x] Originating Depl. Public Works [x] Finance (Check for copy only, if applicable) CONCU~NCE: f¡ .~~ AbsentOouglas Anderson ......-¡, . ,/ Count Administrator ./ "'---- [x] Parks and Recreation Depl. [x] Budget & Rev. COOL o ¡¡ ... '-' ..., DNISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 02 - 018 ~~~§~~~¡~~~~~~~¡~~~~~~~~~~~~§¡~~~~~~~¡~~~~§~~~¡~~~~§~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~¡~~~~~~~~~~~~~¡~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~¡~~~::~~¡~~~¡~¡ TO: Dan McIntyre, County Engineer FROM: ";J-~ Don West, County Engineer 5p-v-- '"/' ~ DATE: January II, 2002 SUBJECT: Treasure Coast Sports Stadium Please approve the attached Releases of Liens for correctness. Ifwe can be of any assistance, please call Scott Isberner, Project Manager, at extension 1707. Barn Attachments (5) cc: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director Mike Powley, Capital Projects Engineer Scott Isberner, Project Manager ..~ ~ (~~ ';: 1[\1,-,,·.. ¡ ~'-'; ~ r. , Ûui JAN I 6 2002 L.- .J EL: C ~ ~,. ~_.~_n ~ \::" .~ -~---'---,- - 1." \ 0 -I \ \ \ \ \ rt V'{JY ¡ OJ> ~-" " ~ (\ a:; o 9 Gt; "a:;/::;¿ .'9 t.L! - f-i 5z:cZ :g¡:¡:~O " 0 -< u ëSOOOOO .. o '" z o ë ~ ~""'r-. Or-. '(Y) /,(' (Y) N , ..... ..... <i' '0 ';r. " ~ " > 1: 3 ,..; v Z Z vi O":;~ ~ 1- v:) g õ' - c:: < "- 0.. ü.i ~ Cl Ö 1- Z U W ~ Ô z > o Z u ;:2 ~ ~ 2 :::- N o r--- Cl ¡...... Z r.r..1 ~ ;:::¡ () o Q :¡: ::J is <0:: l- (/) (/) I- 0:0:00 oo~ CL>-(Y) (/)I-....J l-ëi5lL. (/) a:: - <l::ww o>õ o-::J wZ....J 0:::Jf- ::J$:(/) ~ZI- woo: 0:\00 I-l1")CL \D -t: ~ t- Z w :E ~ ~ a: o LL W ~ U u: i= a: w u CI Z <t Z o - ~ U - ....J a. a. <r ~ ~ ~ v ~ < ~ :.0 I- o <0:: 0: w I- > Z o OC\D U 000 0'\ ....J w~ (\ (\ <o:: (/)(Y) N/,(' U oc....J :¡:\Dã: Q..lL. o":'lf- ffiw wONU 1-_ ::Jo::~:,:! ZU Z -<:I' w w 3 ~ ~n;5 (Y) 0 'i. I- z<zc;:S (/) ::J<O::Z -w ZI- o <L::WO: .....0: UZO:UW~NO wOOO:O_l!'lCL a::ow U--'ã:: ::J>u.. -'0 I- 00 a::=<: t;; g:; ~ 2i?:: z C e..; '.' z ~ ;; 00 00 ~ "0 V >.. oj 8~-5t( ::J c;'" 0.'0 -:o....s'Oe: ~g:g~2 "BUC"i:uU) -- c: 0..0...... ~ .., c; ~ " o iU 0 U) "_ c: .0 OJ ..... ~ ~VJ"OvQ) ~VJ 2 u t...c: ö~~e:c: tí5..c:¡:e: SE~G.J2 " >-." E '" 0&:='>.4-00 U 0,"," l-o Eo.. V ;:! J2 ~ 1-, E ~c:=J2~ o.Q~lno. ............u ÐB~~c .o:..::-=u~ u c.. ..51-, r' c:..VJ......::¡ =",-:::ct:t.J 2.~;du~ ~-5=~..:: .ë~ûo"" -.00'-'0 ~"OQ[;~ ~~vc.~ E~~.c~ " 8 ë .>: e: g~8ío u 0 u '"'s" ;::-'" t:~..c:<.l::""" §~; -i: ~ u................ '-' '0 'õ:;'¡;: ~..':: (l)':'::: "'d cuoo~ _~.c ~ '- .:: ~-g;¡ët: -ðc;"Et)~ c:c8~U) ~.g~ëë ,.... ~ 0 OJ ¡::; E.S u E 1- e..; ~ ¿ t) i: ;: U 1-" Z-;s w-'" ~.~ ~ .2 Q.t) u O:§ 08 u. c;-o .- v Z e:--5 OEn " ~ -.0 " ~ c; .'!: C::( ::: c0.' ,... ~ ~ '-' E ¡-::::: - -.r.ü -I", Q. 5 Q. ~ ~ - c; .... OJ " ......... E u >-.0 C/J 8. Cl 0: ~ < 2< 0" ~- I- '0 :.; () '"' " ~ ~ =~ ~'!: ~ 0: " .2 t-.Q~ ~ " Z ë c 0:.=';::; ~ ~ () ~: :¡: :J Cf) t; <0:: a: I- z o U ..J <t Z a ä: o ... .. ... .. '" ....... (/) 0: ~ ~ U " <C Cl 0: f- Z o o ....J « o oc I- o ~ W >.. co w N ~ c ~ a w a: ~ Cf) ~ +1 ~ w !;¡: a o I- :¡: ::J Cf) 8 ,) ~ ~ Q 2r 2 j~ 1~%~{ . ~-g-r ~~a: C " f.L.; >-:e VI .... L.o ._ c; u .c: aJ =' v.: .... gO-§u V) U tr. E IX> r- eo.... ~g o N c cOw î:g ~Ë...: -I !5 ~ 'E0- ., 2- ~ ..... 2 LU £..., \~~ o".~ ... ... ~;) -- "'--re- o ~ ¡;:_" -:;¡ t'-- _ r--- ::! ()"'" - ~ ~ c ..:::; C'_:: ":J::'V: '" ªŠ~- '-" + 'J: ~ - ûi~ ~ ;~ ~.::; I 'rJ Ij~j UJ a: .. ß~ I-r::: UJ() ..J Q. ~ :¡: O() Uc; ....JE ~" ....."";': °u 1-- '"'I -r -j lr (I) Q¡ 'E o a> Ol c '" .c: () >, .0 ~ t C <t '" e: .c I- o Z ãj 0 z U :::. I ~/J -Q - ~ Oó >-. C ; U ~ >- ž;;;: I o q ... ... UJ '-' « Z ~ UJ a:~ (j)" (j) '" wf" ..J V', 0" L.U ~ z:::; a:", <t'" w..!! ..J..., « " ..... ~ 0:; 1-:::: .:; I- Z W ~ ~ Q. 0: o U. W ~ () ü: - t- o: W () C/J 5 w I- - J: o 0: ~ ('l IV IU '-< .......c..c 0 .g.:~u aJo-o-r: -5~~ê: 1:ll J~O " .0 .- U C'l:a...-gv lI':l..c._ ..c c:.....U)...... .90 t":-a -~'Oc: ~ .... aJ ('l .....]~VJ- Cl.J ~ iU...... lS,-<'-<c C .., 00" ~ ° E 8 ~ 5." "¥ 0 ~ g c;..,..c:Cl C.c ~ ...... c:..... .... u cg~eci 'E~ ë!:2 u,t:::~ou... .8·:::-u¡:: - t;"'t ~ ~ .t2 u .- -. ¡u 5tJ}1~u E u -0 .:: r- ".::: c ::: Z U-5Na.J~ o'-<r'uO Cl-<õc; .... v"- -.: ~ U"c ~"2< l:-Eov c:c-è3:j-5 co 1.0::, ~ lo...., U .;::; .S c; c ;d ë üo; ~ 0 -= :.= bl)....;;:¡ UJ ~ 5:"B~ E ü: .- ,,-:;: ° >-. ¡:: e:.~ ö~ 8. a: ~-5c~"" UJ !: eo":;': -S ~ 0 ~ c:.n"''''O I- "B'Ü;üo~ z 8 .~ .~ è·E :J u -..c: :.= c: 0 " E u "'''' ::i!: oS 8 < 5-.'!: <t d .. ... I- Z W :¡: ~ Q. a: o LL (j) w. !;¡:~ o~ ¡¡:~ w ¡:: s :Je a:t: UJ" I- o U Z Cf) ~ UJ :J ::¡;; o ë.. ~ :> ~ Q. W 5 l- e:..':: z 0.\0 w Cf) v a: Cf) ~ a: UJ -::; :::> ..J - U w Cl -<C ~... ~ UJ a: Cl z Õ :J ..J U ~ :r Cf) Z\i:ì' ü: ~ 0·:: f---' w::l u.!! ZN") :3~ <0::== 0):::' r-· :r.: ~, ..." ~£? ~~ .::;~ '-= ~ ~-S ~ ~ ~ ~ 2:- "'11 - - ¡:,- ~ ~ M _ ~ $>,,> <: '" ~ ~ .~ ::t; ::: :::: Q :::: ~~ .... 0 .;, IJ ~~ ~"2 " ;~ c ~~ ::-~-., ij'=\i - s:-~ §.s~ c~!:: - ..... ':1;.¡ ::: .~ ~ \3~-:::: ':::-.;3.;: "- '" ~ .3.;:; E: ~ -S \:S - ., .... -= ~o r:-; tr '" oS? U ~ ~ ~ tLl ~::!-I- \Joo':;:: <:1>::::,..9 - ::: ~u ~~ 8 ~ '" z o ¡:: U ::J Q "-l Cl V) z o ¡:: is Cl -< >- cc ~ -< ~ ~ ::¿ - ~ ~ Eo 'Jj 2 ~ 'J; ~ ",,- ,... ~ ~~ ~ o g!lE e l-r..lMVJo. ~ .!::3 0. Z u.Q " ~ > ~ 3 t~ C: ;; c c U.c: v .=: -£: ¡: 8 ~ >-." ï=:~..; o 5 :; ... E'::: ~ ~5 >-. o.u '" QJ =O:E ~ -- Q.J ...... Cl ß ~ ;:¡ fi:iS-g ;:fr~ ~ijo tj",u t....u~ Z c: ë ::J"C o~u ;;;: ¡:; - -<t: E :) ~ ~t ¡::; 0.. C . ~ u~o J3cu .S:;: ~ ,.... .....::)-::; 5bE 0 ;:! . ~ .: .= ~ o IU .~ c: t) ï: .~..c >.. 3-05 =-:: u -- 2:5""· "¡;: g ~ ti L4 .~ ug"g In u"- >..:at":~ ::Qf-.t:Q., j èJ f:S'O 00 1- l.> ~ ~ .§ , ,¿; ü ~; ~! "'= o~ ,....z CJj t-~ Z w~ ~~ u:.:i 0::; Cz c(~ -.> «< .6' tr. W Ü Z -< :r:: u f-- "-' ~ N en en ,... . N o r-. o , , ~ ;: c ( ~ ~ " " ê " E ::J U o 'C t: <Ii .s:; ?; ~ ::J " " o > '" E '" '" 'C ~ :J U en .0 o <Ii .0 Õ c ~g ~š þ. ~ ¿~ G'~ .Si ~o ~- ~l... §~ ~õ ~> :.:..Q,¡ 8= ::õ :-. G.I :::::õ '- :J ~= ;;:j <'0 :'-;c iiCCl i~ <- .~ '" <Ii '" C '" .s:; u ~:ë f-.g> ;1 ~ §::u @cri . :i ~š <'5 . '> ðg' Ek ~ 0 ;.:.;g N_ ,,0 =-., -0. . 'C '-" ~~ i~ ~~ "-~ 56 :.:..z "'2 f-a: g~ ~ :1 ;-:~ ~ ~, ~ .r ~~ iii S en l!! " '" '" .. -¡¡¡ C :§> (; c <t 'C ~ .!:: 'C <Ii .~ a. c .e :5 '" u '" 5 en '" .s:; .s:; .!'! .c ~ 'E <Ii E :J U o 'C <t ~ õi c :ª (; c '" " en :J ::2 :J o .c "' :J {2 '" '¡" .. <.:> if: '" 0 ;.:.¡ <.:> QS ... ...... 0 0 0 0 N N ..... ..... 0'1 LO ... N ('-. ..... ..... ('-. boo::: ... (Y} ... (Y} ,..; W Ö Ö '-' t: E- Z Z Z 0 0 E- O Z 0 U ~ 0 ë2 "-l ~ "-l Õ' ~ 0.. :; ::! "" -:; ::! 0.. .~ t -' "" :J 0.. ¡.... ~ < "- U :J < UJ > E- :J .... :c § u "" .~ < ~ ~ ~ Nì 0 f"-. (,) ¡.... Z ¡¡J :;2 :J U 0 :>. ã. 0 c. '" -< Z ?:- ~ Ë -< ¿: '" ~ E .g ~ .... C .'3 .Š "- õ ,., '0 .... ~ '0 v; ~ :J '"" V .c: ~ OJ ¡;:; :J '" c:o ~ OJ '" ¡: '" c::: c "" .., .~ UJ .~ -S ~ .... lJ ~ 9 :J c::: ~ ~' W z v W < º § :I: z > ~ '" en ;:; 1:: ." ~ u ~ "0 YO ~ Z c.; :J C C '" 0 ~ 5 g - :t: ~ - < .'" ~ ~ ::::! ~ ~- v r:- c ::> ~ - Z ;:; 0 '" - c::: c .... ~ c:o .Q E Z ~ c ;;; ~ "ë 3 0 èS "IS .0 U < ~ ~ :; Ü < ::; - ... - ..., Y' 00000000000 0 0000 0 0 ",,,, 00000000000000000 0 l.:J-' 00000000000000000 0 <""~ z<'" - -;;:!:;: ¡:::<e>: ",>' ~~ 0 00 000000000 0 00 0 0 0 0000000000000 00 00 0 '" 0000000000000 00 00 0 u :z:~ :I: zO"'l.:J <¡"'Zl -' -u êã ~- û 00 0 000000000000 00 0 00 0 0000000 0000 00 0 '#+ ..... ... ... 1""""fr-fr-f1""""f1""""fr-f1""""f ....... r-f .- ....... ..... .... .... 2' 00 0000000 0000 0 0 00 0 0 0 l.:J 0000000 0000 ~ ~ 00 0 0 0 t.:..lLrJw,-.... 0000000 0000 co 0'100 <!Ì ci cYÌ ..:tJ61-~ <.D'<t00000 LOOLO ('-. (Y}OLO ('-. 0 "Ot f5....¡...¿§", CONLO'<tCOCOVLOO(y} 0 '<t(Y}('\ ..... 0 ,- .... oc...cn + ..¡ (Y}' ....' rri <.D' (Y}' co' N' LO' cò W rri O'Ì W N' ¡...~OOO <.c ...... o:z:¡...~ LO C\J LO u< .... 0 0 000 0 000000000 0 0 0 00000 0 000000000 0 0 C! "'>- oocicici ci ciciciciociooci ci 0 ~~ozw 0 ""- " ;:;:zO::1-O:: ""B3ooo !:;:~!;;60 ~"- 00000000000000000 0 0 00000000000000000 0 0 ooóocicioociociocicicioo ci ;:;: "" 0 5: '" '" 1- '" ï: ...J 1- - ~ 0 u '" 00000000000000000 0 '" =>:z: 00000000000000000 0 0:: ºo~ cioociciciciciciooCÒ~cici<!Ìo cYÌ ~ >¡:'" <.D"OtOOOOOLOOLO ('-.(Y}OLO('-.O "Ot 0 "'< CONlD"OtCOCO'<tlDOlYJ 0'<t(Y}('\ .....0 ..... ;;'u+ ii2e. '<to rri .....' rri w rri co' N' L!Î co' <.D' rri 0'1' W C\J' <ñ ..... lD N lD 0"- .... e>:< " 0000000000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 00000000000000000 0 '" cicicioocioocicicicò~cici0ci cYÌ -'''' =>=> <.D'<tOOOOOlDOlD ('-.lYJOlD('-.O '<t U 0.... CON lD '<t COCO '<tlDOlYJ O'<tlYJN.....O ..... :ë~ '<t' rri ,....; lYJ' w rri CÒ Ñ lD' CÒ <.c' lYJ' O'Ì <.D' Ñ w ..... u \!' N \!' '" ..... :;;; U) i":ì U) w ....................."" U I- '" OO¿...J 2: w --.J-''-''-' 02:Z 0 WWI-I- uO- (l)W'--ffi ¡s< ¡:¡::¡:¡::SS ...J l-üUlI-<l; " (1)(1)00 ,..." <l;.....:::c>::;;:~ÜN 0 (I)(I)ZZ ~::ì l-'!l:oa::8(1)CJ'!l: 0000 '--' '--' Z (1)(1) i'5a:::J~a::I-~a:: OJ ° a::a::üü ü()>->- W W2:a::W I-LLI-W ¡:: ,..." ...J -10 OI-IU)-:::cO "- <l;<l;o:a:: ,..."OO-I-a::O.....W...J a:: (l)U}<l;<l; ~¿CLCLI-ZO-10a::0~0 U cc¿¿ WWoo~WwCJw21-...Jw './) ::J::Jër:oc UUI-I-:JifCJ2:CJo::cr:oCJ :..:J 0 OOCLCL -- Z-Z WüZ »WWO:ï- ::.:: LU3'=(I) ZZ...J...J cr:cr:cr:cr: ::J<l;a::<l;:;;: <l; OOCLCL WW--°O':::C<l;IOO::JI ü()u.u. CflCfl3'=3'=¿W()CLüa..CL~() ~. 0 ..... N (Y} '<t lD <.D ('-. ",0 < '-2 .....N(Y)'<tlD<.Dl'-O'JO'\ ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... - N .,; en '" en <> .... :J M 'C e R Q. l!! Cl '" Ôi .. 'E ., E :J <> 0 'C c::: '" .c ~ :; <> <> 0 "- OJ E .. ",. OJ "'c: "C 0-2 '" >-::J :; 0 !;l'" u "' '" rn Z 12 .0 0. 0 "'- '" .,.. .. ~j' .0 (3~ Õ <: ",0 3: t:~ TO .. Ü> ., '" .. Cl <.c e:: ",- OJ °ll .c <> ~:a - ;:¡¡¡ III !::= :: !;ï~ rn Z'O l!! -I: :J Z" .. §~ .. <0 "'- õi Ol- e:: ::¿'§, :§> <'1: Oll¡: (¡ :Co <: 1-0 < · ui ",,:) 'Ò g;", l!! -.. -= @Š ..2 "C > ., ~g> .Ë <~ èi · 8 e:: Z 0 .2 0- 'S _ 0 1-.c .. -0. 8-g <.> <II ",,,, £ ~æ -£ <II · ë OJ ",::> .c a.. .c ....0 u "z :c ",2: ~ oa: 'E "',0: 1-;: .. Ol . E Ol _ '" :J ü=ig¡ u 0 z": 't:> Ox ::: (::9 <- < :.IN ~W õi 1-0 c Z _ '¡;' OZ ;: uf2 0 . v <: MZ OJ IH '" rn 1-:5' :J z'" 't:> l1J ' '3 :E~ 0 ::>z .c (,) . <II 0'" :J o~ ~ Z «Ol :ž <~ 0 ¡:: ::> « 0 · .. ~ ~ ~ ~ r::¡- FINAL WAIVER OF LIEN OR CLAIM ON BOND COUNTY OF PALM BEACH STATE OF FLORIDA Whereas, the undersigned GRA YEAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. having been heretofore employed by GERELCO ELECTRIC to furnish certain material and services, to wit: Electrical panels, switches and/or motor controls, wires and cables, electrical raceways, conduit fixtures and boxes, ,,,iring devices, lighting fi:\.iures and/or other electrical materials, supplies good, wares, merchandise and equipment on the following described property: TREASURE COAST SPORTS STADIUM NW UNIVERSITY BLVD PORT ST. LUCIE 233639, A PORTIION OF SECTION 23 TOWNSHIP 36 RANGE 39 ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Now, therefore, the undersigned, in consideration for payment of the sum ofTEN ($10.00) (if by check then subject to coIleçtion)and other good and valuable considerations to the undersigned in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does to extent of such payment, waive, release, and relinquish its right to claim a lien or líens or claim on bond for work performed and/or materials furnished to said property. 1bis release is a final release of lien or claim on bond. 11ús Final Release of Lien or Claim on bond is given pursuant to Section 713.20 (2) of the Mechanics' Lien Law and 255 of the Florida Statutes. Signed, sealed and delivered this 12 day of JULY, 2001 "'''~'''il" A' ,..-;;',!!,.t~'fi;" nn Marie Young {;.,'·å·;;g MYCOMMISSION#CC860376 EXPIRES ·...;.ä"..> October 23, 2003 '¡{.o/f.,r.-~.." SONDED rH~ TROY FAI,., INSURANCE, INC GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC. By -f-,..,yyv{t, J\.~~ JAMES A LABRA CIANO - FINANCIAL MANAGER THE FORGOING INSTRUMENT was acknowledged before me this 12 day of JULY, 2001 by JAMES A. LABRASCIANO as FINANCIAL MANAGER ofGRAYBAR ELECTRIC. On behalf of the corporation. He is personally knoml to me and who did appear before me at the time of notarization. Notary Public: ~~~ ANN MARIE YO \.or' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C. - """f w- DATE: February 5,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Work Authorization NO.2 with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. for Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Shoreline Stabilization and Improvements Reach 2 BACKGROUND: On May 1,2001, the Board approved work authorization no. 1 with BCI Engineers, Inc., for the design and permitting of Taylor CreeklC25 Restoration Dredging Project. In an effort to stabilize the shoreline concurrent with the dredging project, staff would like to hire BCI to devise a method of stabilization of the shoreline, minimizing erosion and silt build-up into the creek, and also reducing the need for future dredging of Taylor Creek. The attached proposal from BCI Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $33,050 includes data collection, design, environmental permitting, bid document preparation and surveying necessary to identify areas of shoreline instability, and design solutions for stabilization. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be reimbursed from the $700,000 grant provided by SFWMD. Funds are available in 140800-4315-563000-4657(Taylor Creek Restoration, SLC Port Dev.) PREVIOUS ACTION: 5/1/01 - Approval of Work Authorization #1 with BCI in the amount of $137,000 for design and permitting of Taylor Creek Project. 8/14/01 - Approval of grant application submittal to FSTED in the amount of $700,000 for Taylor CreeklC25 Dredging and Restoration Project. RECOMMENDATION: Engineering Staff recommends Board approve Work Authorization NO.2 with BCI Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $33,050 for the Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Shoreline Stabilization and Improvements Reach 2 and signature by the Chairman. COMMISSION ACTION: [{] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) CONCU,ENCE: (¡.~~ Douglas Anderson County Administrator Coordination/SiQnatures . 1\ [x]Mgl. & Budget 'lit,!) I\'\~ [ ]Revenue Coord_ [x]Co. Eng~ [lOther [x]County Attorney [x]Originating Dept. Public Works ~ Jx [ ]Finance taylorshore linedredgebciwa2. ag '-' WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.2 ...."I Engineering Services Related to Dredging COO-OB-SSO for Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Shoreline Stabilization and Improvements Reach 2 Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between S1. Lucie County (the "County") and BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc.(the "Engineer") dated June 13, 2000, the Engineer agrees to provide the Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A" and for the Compensation described in Exhibit "B". All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit "C". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ENGINEER BY: Print Name: BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. Date: Jan 04 02 11:03a BCI ENG SCI 904 253 1767 ",.3 ........ ....; EXHIBIT" A" SCOPE OF SERVICES BCI PRO.JECT NO. 19-10801.2 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROJECT NO. COO-06-556 TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION DREDGING PROJECT: REACH 2 SHORELINE STABILIZATION AND IMPROVEMENTS 1. Data Collection Research background site data available including canal design drawings, surveys, navigation charts, soil reports, historical water levels, aerial photographs, etc. Three site visits are anticipated during the project for design purposes by DCl's staff. Interview persons knowledgeable of the site. One meeting with City of Ft. Pierce officials, St. Lucie County and SFWMD and discussions with others as necessary by phone and fax, to determine outside involvement with a recreation component to the project. Meeting with the client to review plans and ideas for consideration. Key information important to defining the project includes: ownership of property adjacent to the waterway, desire to create passive recreation areas, desire and funding to create access to the water for vessels or fishing, level of maintenance and security available. To be provided by St Lade County: SOU boriDg 8Dd sieve aualysls report by the County's geoteelmkaI consultant on eontract., per speeitkation by DCI. 2. Design Preliminary design sketches of alternates for shoreline protection and associated structures. At least two alternate plans shaIl be prepared for preliminary review. One review meeting with the client and other interested parties. Review of comments and incorporation into a fmal design plan. Detailed calculations, dimensions, drawings and specifications sufficient fur construction and permitting. Drawings shall be prepared on 11 "xI7" paper and may be reduce to 8 1/2" xli" for permit submittals if necessary. Project specifications shall be included in the plans. 3. E""iro"mentaJ Permitting The preliminary plans shall be submitted along with the original project (Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project) in the State Environmental Resource Pennit (ERP) application. Minor effort beyond our original contract is envisioned to be included this work, such as additional application narratives, table values and 8-112" x II" permit drawings made from the design details. Mitigation requirements may be increased for the overall project permit due to inclusion of this work. 4. Bidding A.ssistance DCI shall assist the client with bid package preparation. We shall rely on the County to provide their standard bid documents including schedule, insurance requirements. bonding, liquidated damages, general specìfications, etc. DCI shall provide the final construction plans and technical specifications to complete the bid package. We will meet with the County to review the final package prior to solicitation. We will solicit bids to the appropriate specialty marine contractors experienced in the type of work required. A minimum charge will be borne by the prospective bidders to cover DCrs copying and labor expenses in preparing the packages. OCI will conduct a pre- bid meeting at the project site and shall answer prospective bidders' questions during the bid process. One written addendum is included in this scope of work consisting of minor revision to the plan, written list and distribution of bid questions and answers. BCI will review bids received by the County and assist in the selection of a contractor. We suggest the County not necessarily select the lowest bidder and request that the County closely review the bidders' infonnation regarding prQject specific tasks and recent performance on similar jobs. 5. Surveyùtg For fee estimating purposes, we have assumed seven locations that may require shoreline protection. This is based on our one site visit prior to our last meeting on the matter where we discussed providing protectioo only in the more severe erosion areas. The surveying work includes profiles at each of the seven spots and a boundary survey verifYing the relation between the top of bank and the canal right-of-way. Jan 04 02 11:03a BCl ENG SCl 904 253 1767 p.'" ",. '"-ttII' EXHIBIT "B" FEE BCI PROJECT NO. 19-10801.2 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROJECT NO. COO-06-550 TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION DREDGING PROJECT: REACH 2 SHORELINE STABILIZATION AND IMPROVEMENTS Bel Engineers & Scientists, Inc. (BeI) will accomplish the services out1ined in Work Order 2 for tIús project (Reach 2 Shoreline Stabilization and Improvements) for a lump sum. fee of $33,050.00 inclusive of expenses. The fee breakdown is shown below. Task Description Fee Data Collection $10,075 2 Design $ 8,450 3 Environmental Permitting $ 3,125 4 Bidding Assistance $ 5,250 5 Survey $ 6.150 TOTAL FEE $33,050 Jan 04 02 11:04a . ~ BCI ENG SCl 904 253 1767 ",.5 ...., z ~:ft'o~~~ ~ Cl"tlCD"DOCD Ci> l!I!J S. !!l....O...oO ~ ~ !I! enCDmii en Gl,g -51. c:- c: a ~ " ci.§~~ :!l G:l 9: "tl (Q III ~... 3 :?I ~ ~ ::l ~ ::l 0 CD .2. c:: :::¡ - UJ 0 ~ ::l» = a'll: r- q ~. ª ~ IT¡ :J 'll: [ æ-.ð g :J g, ~ tT 0 ... ::l ¡ ~Oenmt~iÔ Õ ~"'if,< . ",3::;:;~ ~ C" ~ mo~~ CD ~ ~ :::r""l0l-a. ?"i~Ì\) '1]"- i !!l.Ãl !!.! ~ 0 0 à 0 õ· r: ::l ~ Cl Q.. ~ c: (Q ::l. :, ::l UJ (Q li? "tl .Q. íii ~ ~ [ en ::T õ· Q ::l I1l. } 5' CD .. ~ CD S. g: Ñ I l!!: 0 :J ~ Q.. 3" '1:J 0 ~ ~ III .." en !::l '" ... :g l!l ... ~ ~ ... ... ¡e .. ... '" ~ ... .. II: ~ 0 Co> '" .. 0 -po '-" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C- ~ ¿I DATE: February 5,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: First Amendment to the Consultant Agreement with Inwood Consulting Engineers for Professional Engineering Services for the Design of S. 25th Street Roadway Widening (Midway Road to Edwards Road) BACKGROUND: On September 12, 2000, the Board entered into a Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) with FOOT to reimburse design and construction of S. 25th Street Widening. On October 16, 2001, the Board entered into an Agreement with Inwood Consulting Engineers to provide design and permitting services for the S. 25th Street Widening Project. As part of the County's agreement with FOOT, the Department was supposed to provide a Bridge Hydraulics Report and Analysis for 10 Mile Creek Floodplain. Due to internal scheduling difficulties, FOOT was unable to meet this commitment in a timely manner that would meet the County's intended schedule for completion of the roadway. After discussing this issue with the FOOT, it was agreed that the County could proceed with having our consultant perform the work, with FOOT reimbursing for the costs. This may require an amendment of our existing Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) with FOOT. Attached is the First Amendment to the Consultant Agreement in the amount of $39,245.23. This will allow the consultant to perform a Bridge Hydraulics Report and Analysis for 10 Mile Creek. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in 101006-4116-563005-4108 Transportation Trust/Impact PREVIOUS ACTION: September 12, 2000 - BOCC approval of Joint Participation Agreement with FOOT to reimburse, design and construction of S. 25th Street widening. February 23, 2001 - Advertised RFP #01-037 for Professional Engineering Services for S. 25th Street Widening. April 17, 2001 - Board authorized staff to negotiate with the top ranked firm and negotiate a contract. October 16, 2001 - Board approved the consultant agreement with Inwood for design and permitting. RECOMMENDATION" Staff recommends B~ approve the First Amendment to the Consultant A~ment with Inwood Consulting Engineers in the amount of $39,245.23 for a Bridge Hydraulics Report and Analysis for 10 Mile Creek and authorize the Chairman to sign. COMMISSION ACTION: [xl APPROVED [ l DENIED [ l OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) (x)County Attorney CONC~ ( ( VZ-r~ Douglas Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Sianatures l ~ - I [x]Mgt. & BUdget~W [x]Revenue COOrd.----E2.£l.t'\ [x]Co. Eng~. [lOther [x]Originating Dept. Public Works s25thscopeamendment1.ag \.f ....,¡ First Amendment To October 16,2001 Consultant Agreement With Inwood Consulting Engineers This First Amendment dated this _ day of ,2002, is by and between St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of FIOlida, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and Inwood Consulting Engineers, hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant". Whereas, on October 16,2001, the County and the Consultant entered into an Agreement wherein the Consultant agreed to provide professional engineering and right- of-way acquisition services for the South 25th Street widening Project; and, Whereas, the parties desire to amend the October 16,2001 Agreement to allow the Consultant to perform a Bridge Hydraulics Report and Analysis for the lO-Mille Creek. Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 2, SCOPE OF WORK, Exhibit "A", is amended to add: · Analyze the hydraulics of lO-Mile Creek and prepare a Bridge Hydraulics Report, · Prepare Bridge Hydraulics Recommendations Sheet, · Perform calculations to establish the FEMA No-Rise Certification, · Perform hydraulic analysis to determine Floodplain Impacts and Compensating Storage Requirements, · Determine Location and Parameters for Compensating Storage Pond, · Prepare and Submit Permit Applications for Bridge and Floodplain Construction to SFWMD, USACOE, USCG, and FEMA 2. Paragraph 4, TIME OF PERFORMANCE, Exhibit "B", is unchanged by this Contract Amendment. Project completion is scheduled for March 31, 2003. 3. Paragraph 4, COMPENSA nON, is amended to add the following: For performing the hydraulic analysis and completing the Bridge Hydraulic Report, the County shall pay to the Consultant a lump sum amount of thirty-nine thousand two hundred forty five and 23/100 ($39,245.23) dollars. This Amendment brings the total E:\ClericaIV obs\SLC-008(25th Street)\Contract\Ammend men t I (S LC -008).doc .... y ~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-:2E DATE: February 5, 2002 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] PRESENTED BY: ~~~~ County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: West First Street MSBU - Potable Water Improvements Request Permission to Advertise for the Second Public Hearing BACKGROUND: See Attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: June 13, 2000 - Board accepted petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing July 18, 2000 -Initial Public Hearing held. Board created MSBU and authorized County Engineer to proceed with project. November 6,2001 - Board approved the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and FPUA RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that permission be granted to advertise for the Second Public Hearing. In the opinion of staff, this public hearing is recommended to be held on March 5, 2002 which is a night Board meeting. COMMISSION ACTION: [x] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) [ ] DENIED (Hutchinson Absent) CONCURRENCE: Çì~~ Douglas Anderson County Administrator [x]County Attorney Coord I natl onlS III natures [xJpublic Works Dir [ ]Mgt. & Budget [X lCo. Eng ÞF~' ( [ ] Purchasing [x ]MSBU Coor '& [ ] Finance ~~ , \-¡ ..." COMMISSION REVIEW: March 5, 2002 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 02-031 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Donald B. West, County Engineer DATE: January 23, 2002 SUBJECT: West First Street MSBU - Potable Water Improvements - F.P.UA Request Permission to Advertise for the Second Public Hearing BACKGROUND: The property owners of the West First Street MSBU petitioned St. Lucie County to establish a Municipal Service Benefit Unit (M.S.B.U.) to fund the costs necessary in bringing potable water improvements to certain properties on West First Street. The water system would be owned, constructed and maintained by the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. The initial petition received represented (71 %) percent in support of the project. On January 10, 2002, the property owners were notified by mail of their tentative assessment and that a second informal meeting would be held on January 24th to further discuss the project. The notification also stated that the County Engineerwould proceed directly to the Second Public Hearing recommending adoption of the assessment roll and to commence construction of the project. The second informal meeting was held with County staff and FPUA representatives on hand to discuss the construction layout and design of the water system, the method of assessment, and the tentative assessment amount. After certain revisions were made to the design and assessment amount, it was the consensus of those present to proceed with construction of the project and the levy of the assessments. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that permission be granted to advertise for the Second Public Hearing. In the opinion of staff, this public hearing is recommended to be held on March 5, 2002 which is a night Board meeting. cc: Staff Concurring OMS Manager Finance Director Tax Collector Property Appraiser ..'" '\ ~ ...., WEST 1 ST STREET MSBU POTABLE WATER - FPUA ___ 'I -, 0 ..~ ~-~ ;: a__.:...:........~ .- ::1::-" ::t'..:~::·o--==--"-·'----:--"""-----'-----: ..- "'---~-K^!-'1l.\œa:::: . '.-: ': " . 11l "~ : ". ! . H .---... -4--- L:l.7iII.u'JoI~L~~{ ~tllzl 1 ~ ~""st!"~ Þ!. IØ' ;h1s~Z( :: Jl).i ,)jJJj I ~.ú~ i}.if. ¡': ,;.. ; ; ; ~"af71 bi;¡;; -¡. ""~ !íf~; 1Irþ~r[j l'dr~I! ~II'tßØIIl'l'1 "C;f.f::ÜII"'tl:Îk ""('(~irrl ¡ ~!á·(ì~:"f¡i:~ _~tìlJl~ 511 'JJ..! ~ _~~ .; :6~ 1121' HT~l ~""T1jf!'.(}!11.~~ ;ii-¡¡¡'!'''TJzrì,~ ~ ". .~ ~..., l-.,. ~ t2"~ ! . . ~ ~ tJ_-1~ì'i4" '--;.. æ!" ::'l~ zsl _ vr~ !II iiI]:: ¡,.t:I"5L:' -IŒ~lrj 3>1)" f~,~ zslq :D.. I. ;,lm1:.1 ¡c~ ~ ~T 1 IS I_I I~:;II; I"J, I. 1'1'~ .1 '1>1' ..1 .1:' 1.ß.1'~ I~': ~_ '" 40. .. - -_ . ._. . .._ :~ ~ . !lð ,,'. . _ b!-...L....£$'l'1 1 17 1:1 ~~--I_ _I' 1 ·:~.-I-'· 1 . I;; _.. _: . ; (~x=:~ 4 ~~I~~lf ~f.;J%.IJ·w:~~I"_; _ ~;~f7" i.-fJr.r.~~ ,~'7~~":: ~ ~ .:~;~lr~ ¡¡ i' 1.:')p' .,Æ:;'f! ~J:.-I~~ t.Il-- 1 _~, i g~ -J.' . '~::J~l\1' (~. 'lIt.'" I'" -'-1-' .. ~'I.I 'I - ': ..;. -~ - - ....... 100. ... - ... 5 ._'10- ~ ,.,.. ¡ './"'I -_!~-'1. '\~- ï '~fll_- T-::J: "r¡'-:¡ ~I:. ,~......,- I. :'3;""'''- t! ~~- /~,. .. ¡~.--. ;-}_I:HIùI,zI..!~ .,,1 "lIS Hip I. ..110 1 -;. ~I 1 ,,--. ~ I..·. .~ ~",~ iCll$lH,'fø iii; l(r~ ¡: ~.llti ~ : I=,¡s 1 I~':' I I I I" 1 I', I I :: ~;J J.: ~ ,:-¡;; I r...;r---¡-' .~ :~ __~ IX1!1'KQJflI : 4--- ---- -- . __ _. _ '._"" __.----.,~...-......_...__.. .Ið...-::_...... OR<4 A: : .¡:;~, .. - - -- =- .£'!<i ..........-"""-1. \ ;...-'2>---::. _ "$ .. .. . "",,,. ¡' 2>0,,-...- -: -....~ ,. - .(~ : .w~ T. ,~. -DClII ~",Þ.~I"U.'< I LI-!-.,..... -.1':: I, -" .. 052/.-: :: ." ,'. ~~11 . (.>40~~., .jh~~C~ (SOI~~IJ ¡õ¡ (SOf~~) -~ "þ:107$/' ~ ,,;;J~~" :'!r~_~:;-i~~~~J~:~~.z it! -t> ~__~: ~'.29 ._~H $1 1,<}.~k@IlJië;ï,.!Ci'r'3"Þo\.___ :tllIl1lTI!.Q)û....,.- 12> :::...-,~,...IIZ ,)I¡.:rl_" IC=I·~ :8¡,,;ll~" :' .... u: _Isoz! <:0 I '--... <.- ?: ~ ~ ~."'õ. "" ~ Ê I~ "'I .... 1l~ I í __. _À~ :m_: 11 ~ ;;1 "" ....."c "'~ ,. -;';' - ::~..,_ t (3403-502- :: w ---l '- . . _ . ,-,. " ~,.111" 151 ~ . STREE. .__ .___ )()99-300/0J & ¡: ;;J~Ml U5C/-c52g:300/2J I. '-,-" \ ~fŒ20-lÇ(J(PJ -?:so i!' I ,J" I I ~-'¡ þ, I ''''I .!. ~T.. '" ,.__: . " -~ ¡¡ N;; EO .'. 2.::.> "" I I -- 2.5J AC : 0 _ ;j "."ll.~ _81 71" 15~'l .s~ Z II¡¡ :.~.____ :m. 2.. 3Rt> T. .....,. .,. z _......3llO .", I,....., . '~I"_ (3«)3-502- ~ ll>O.>l 1<0> '''~'-..I '':~~_ ~~'. Ul. ''':-, "'." ~~'~;}..1~.1. :II>O"J ;-'>0-, ,'-=.' 1 I ~i-'~~ ';;.'51.7':::: œ:KQO//J lì : ¡ ~ !.:--. ~ :--,..:: ·~·S ~. : ~ . . .-.--': .--.,._-ò .... : j--l)¡¡ "'I.U~ .-l-~ !8lj,Iz./:.U. 1 H IS i-JZ;;¡ ¡:l.:'::: ...,O:?11·.Ac ¡ ¡ ~ I ' ; ~ : ;__:- ~--, _~ I :----:" ;~...,;;: ~__.-;; ,: ~ _:" '. .... ~ ¡ :r,;¡¡¡' llOOt I M'-, f. '~I ; I-~ ._.. >4O~?P?: ~ : ¡ ~··I- -..,-" 7'." I ".... .., '.. '-' ~ _~<"~ .. ::: ¡.. EHOERS . ROJU 0 XHXXUa; ¡¡ : ,.. ..""""--:-O."".,.,.!mQ- -'-.. .,. ". ....7lJ< ..... ~. : ~ .. I ._"-::' .." : '--"l-J.-----::::::. .....-----..,......... .-.--....:-..-. _..,.-' '''''' :'..lP 1 l>cd 1 I I--~~l--L I ~ >0 >0 ~8!# n R::;' Ar .....-"'--.:.. -- - ...._ -..--..J;'-IC"--- ~..' . ~. ~- .---'. ._~.. . --l3 ¡: ...... UU6' ", ....... r-;:~-.. -,-:,.",.-:'~".': ~ ~~-t~lðlZ!"lZ7 .æ:...1.ll>1", ~l.nl '. ?'OIOHJOO/5J~ ¡¡ :';:'~:'-: ;':--" ;".. ,-- .:~ ~.~ '!~, ~ ";¡;J.,~ è -~.., 'j,.. I _ -j -s·;=j;'.o '1-' 13<1-"' "" .M ':10' . ¡ 1· '::1:" ~ '? u:: .. ~ :.u:;l .-¡z-,~ =. ':;' ;.ó-',; ,-','. ". t $:> 10::-' J:;:.J'>..-s'5l.~'6J " ~ ~.. """'90 . -. -. - ..- ~. ~ 0..: ..... 12 ..... (fU'ìJ ._.. ~Tfl :¡O:;if u.w u e:. OiOŽ:Wo/z) f ~ ~ I:so~,~. ",-'" uu m oi.. ~;;; ;...{. - .,;~> ¡J" :·:..ss 1.50 At:: .. rf : . u, .':~ ~ "~1~-, .-'!~-:; . ~..2' W . ". ~"If "". l)O .-: = '7 "" .,. -J: '::J ;(!::.....!~~.. ¡... " .. . Z -- ::.::. 4, .. . -, ""-'." -, : /SO(- (5(J(- ""'"" L"~~~ ji ;s. t ..::: :...-..:- :.:-.- ._.~.: :! :...~ : = :6r~ :,_..7.. =- .:,..........:! i ~0S/97:~ osn...!! ~. ~(5OI~5 ~f'-. .. :-: ~ ........:0 ~ :: .,"-if ....... ""..2' 17<..2' '" ..' '__J ~.' ~~ '..' -: lX1O/8l'li:ij)i;~. <$" -()()/')/Oí-~. l' ~ :$_':;: $' :_. ~ :~., ..-..... ~-'- .<. .~; "~.~......,, : ''';~ ",,' lOZ-~.- Cl: :'-;r:~' '..:0 "-'''~I'-' (J40~ : -.:;:~_..::.:::...._...:u- .-.:::--.... ___..... : "'" ¡ . ~ .'9 ....... II> 50. . ::' "'r---' .",... u> ....... ~ -~-...::.1:).~__..õ>-.._.. : .~ --;l>o "* U OW, \Ii ;o~8 :: þO.2~.. ~~....! .--.....- ;-:a_. ;-~..._ I ~ -_ '1,.....::- .'l"'4ðO ~~__ tOO '00 ¡"J)O ::: 1!!E.:t.. :. 1--" . ._-~. '-.-." . J>' ~" -<c; ",UI:; ~'-. _:: (5Of-OS2D-OOO/ß) ~ I.on.-,-. ~^O!l.. < '4.Ai7u .:..... - ..os "- H-~ -"4 .JZ S. ........ 'g'" :... ~~. ___ ~~ .. ....r.: US "i: :.1:~!: ":...:".; -$! ....-;; ·..It...·:; 1J _ :..........- ~i:= 20 =i~'~~?i.;t~;; Ðò) :::0 ,. .,~ ....;:" I'" '.. " {SOf-C52J,tYY>/SJ ro'ti-:~. ....l:: . '~ ..,-. :Jlþ ."..... ",.os "'..2 137 =,. ...... "...,. 2>3.33 1:'1: _~_Z~ ="'=~ i'1f~ __ 1-__1-__ _ -.::::..... !il ~. I ".". "'.7< 07<..2< 1><0.>' U. ... 1>L>1 ::!!::~. ¡¡! ~V- ,:¡¡~ =¡.., _~ ~ __... .__ - H l.....J:·--:~I· .-----:~ :..J: ~ -4 :: ..-....... U_n ...--._ ~ ~i -..-:ao . ~m 90 - ~~;,:..: 5:;: 1':~.-.: : :::.x,.'-.;:: ". Z._ . .-"- -"S ~~. 6·:' T' - ., ..:: 6. ,-:.69- -, 10:': -::: ....__..... - ;¡ L -; ',';¡- pi.;" 17..,. :_'"_: :-.;- :.:'.' ~:: ¡:_ : '-(5Ot~'>CJV'It"UOJ ( ., .'f!Ï~~', I!.... "" "" /; ... r..o..r. J '!t. tis· 1.-11' '( ..;.: - ~'(~_'^^"' -~l.t!1 ~ q ;\_-<?'-l_.._._..~.._·-_···"ï::R2F'T'iVOCU------....-.:~ ui· ,....11 __.-.......~1œ"-.:: - ;~..., 1,:'¡'9 At:. :;..a' ~~tDQ 10Q :)0 Þ vd./or~__ $ ¡ "~j ..J,OO a=o W u.... ~~._-u.li:----"S"' ! - ...~]Õ; ~~.b:l l~ 03 ... ~.':; , '-... ~;;:: ..._.;,%1 .-. ¡......... .-.....,-: ~ 11\.97 '6,>-,.: c.. _~ ~ ~ ~ 11..~ . ¡ ¡ [ '¡': ~ :,5".-: :".- ~ a; ...>;!....~ ~1·-·:...... 5 . ;.;: ;: 1 If~ (:¡çf~;; F1~'-:";; ' 8Ó 3.l, 'I'" ",,- .. ''''¡ . l'-':' ... -- : . , r.. 10';; " .. -ocn........ - ~ ..0--...---.., ... : ~ .......- - ;: ..,. 'O'. . - --- ~ tt (_,# - _ ......-:..~~. .. .---1 3!2 M't ....20 m.2 m 1)3.1). fiCO:';" . ~ :33.)] .....QJ.Ac ...... .- . _ Ill> ;a l\: ~ 4""'" ß3.,. ....... ~ Itl.,.--~.~~:_-.,,:"~~- .¡;?~_.,...~ 7l!t: (501~ : ..+--l ". __,-~___[~I... f~m.a.o", : ~- -;:.;-" ....l"l" r~ <=/~ ~.{.J.: ¡ r I (5OI~/OJ ~ ::xJH1555-I5()L. ~ "':><TVV.N:I¿ r:---';;:' .-..-. ...... "" liti"'I '-"0<0 : ';'¡re:¡ ::; ,- 1;;. . ::. : ~....l. _ ~ ~,,-. ~.. : ¡::.., ;.?-,o~ Ac : : - ·J.32 Ac - \....."'.00 At::....: -: I ~___.\~ ---(!50HJ545<JOO/5J g ~ - _f I _ _ =::...._ _ õ)........ 0>0 50,... :._ ~ "l....=!~5J I @l!DYD..@i/' a ~~ ~'r:::x.J S>Q - r..@!!.91"D..~.t:--. .-.:---- ~ ~:_ :: ;.~. I (50l-lJ553-(J()O/8JJ :3 ~Vi\~TED .--. ~C!_ 1l1J I' 1~ÚJs5r-otWsi . :,~. ,-- _:.:. J 1 7.í9 I< ~ ~!lTH ST_ ~(~-200/!~_ ";':'; 250' k" :::: :.~I' I __,_-'-_ j ë:.·r¡ .... ~~Zk,_;.. ~-..<~ :~~~ _ _._.-~ --.-_J ____.___= ".. .- - I 1,).o:5¡ I I 11~1 I l.:<m'- I Þ.)þ I \,).;J I þ \ À. '-" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ...", C-2f DATE: February 5,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT-ROAD & BRIDGE DIV. ~ ' .- J. Scott Herring, anager Road & Bridge Division SUBJECT: Approval of Change Order #3, release of retainage, and make final payment of $185,543.65 for the 1999-00 Annual Resurfacing Contract with Dickerson Florida, Inc. BACKGROUND: Change Order #3 will adjust the estimated quantities of this project to reflect the final quantities used to resurface roadways for 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 years. All work is complete and final payment will be for the retainage amount held during the project. FUNDS AVAILABLE: 101003-41132-563000-42003 - Transportation TrusULocal Option Resurfacinq 101002-41122-563000-42003 Transportation TrusUConstitutional Resurfacing PREVIOUS ACTION: The 1999-00 Resurfacing Contract was awarded in the amount of $1,166,499.23 on November 14, 2000 Change Order #1 in the amount of $1 ,400,000.00 was approved May 22,2001 Change Order #2 in the amount of $ 5410.52 was approved May 22, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance, approval of Final Change Order #3 which will decrease the contract by $711,062.73 to a final contract amount of $1,860,847.02, authorize the Chairman to sign the Change Order, release of retainage, and make final payment of $185,543.65 forthe 1999-00 Annual Resurfacing Contract with Dickerson Florida, Inc. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ~] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) [ ] DENIED (Hutchinson Absent) ~~ Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator [X]Counly Attorney [X]Public Works Director flt./ [ ]Finance (check for copy only. if applicable) Sk [XI Purchasing w [ lCo. Eng [XI Barb Meinhardt, Rev Coord. (r . '-" APPUCATION FOR NO. _6_AND FINAL PAYMENT ..., (The fo/Iowino 10 be comD/etød by the Contractor); (Reviled 1OJ11991 PROJECT NAME: 1999..00 ANNUAL RESURFACING CONTRACT ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. : OWNER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA CONTRACTOR: DICKERSON FLORlOA,INC BEGINNING DATE APPLICATION AMOUNT: $185543.65 NO.CAl.DAYS 90 FOR PERIOD ENDING: 1 / 'J 0/ 'J 0 0 'J INITIAL CONTRACT AMT. $1,166,419.23 BASED ON EST. OTY. BY CONTRACTOR AS APP BY ENG TABULATION OF AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT COMPLETED TO DATE (See Attached "Estimate of Completed Worxj $ 7166499.23 (+)$ 1400000.54 (+)$ 5470.ifr (+) $ - 711 0.4 ~ 'J 7 (+)$ CHANGE ORDER NO. I CHANGE ORDER NO. . 'J CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 CHANGE ORDER NO. @ 100 @ 100 @ 700 @ %COMPLETE %COMPLETE %COMPLETE %COMPLETE Previous Pavments: : ~~mn¡ ~oÞJ : i. 7 (+)$ 7860847 02 (.>: lýH~~fU (-) TOTAL WORK TO DATE LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENT SUB-TOTAL LESS FAILED LAB. TESTS AMOUNT DUE FINAL PAYMENT, EXCEPT FOR ANY LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ASSESSED BY BOARD $I,I"b,iJ.~9,¿3 , .. $ 1';ÐOOOO.OD :¿ iì:~~~:~~ $ , .:5) $ U?('Ð) g42~ 02- : I; ~~~;~S-~::~ $ . $ 1 g ~ t;'I-~:J, ,65 CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of pe~ury that all obligations incurred by the Contractor under this Contract to date have been discharged in full; that no suits are pending in connection with the work under the Contract; that the Contractor agrees to the total final price of $ 1 860847. 02 and final payment of $ 1 85543. 65 as full settlement of this account under the Contract and of all claims in connection therewith. FloJr..i..da Inc. BY: -- TITLE: President DATE: 07/18/2002 COUNTY OF STATE OF Before me this 18th day of January_, 2002, personally appeared _Larry T Dale_, known to me, who being duly swor' e and say that he is the President~ (office) of the Contractor above mention ; '5h ~ attached appiìcallon rét payment and executed above affidavit on behalf of said Contracto ; IU'ónr.~~~~~. ""'" ..."... ~... ect, ~Plete. ~ MY COMMISSION if DO 076789 b My commission llllPires: EXPIRES: December 30. 2005 711 . , l~NOTAAY FL Nolory Service & Bonáng, I"", ary Public ' (The fo/Iowino to be comD/eted bv /fie EnaineerJ: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA The attached application for paymenl by the Contractor has bee~fgiewed by. the E2;9ineer and hereby approves the final payment under this application in amount of $ 5 Òe) 11-:3. b _ , less liquidated damages assessed by Board. WITH ACTUAL PAYMENT SUBJECT T CONTRACTOR SIGNING ABOVE AFFIDAVIT. DATE APPROVED BY ST. LUCIE COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION Contract Time Began: Substantial Complelion on: Actual Construclion Time: Contract Construction Time: Rainy Days Allowance: Other Overrun Allowances: Net Overrun: P. M. Bowers Road & Bridge Manager RayWazny, P. E. Public Works Director CHECKED BY Cal. Days 90 Cal. Days Cal. Days Cal. Days Cal. Days PREPARED BY þ..q~1 H.¿~Cvy l-d.~~Ðð. I St. Lucie County Road & Bridge Dlvlslan .. .... '" '" , N .,"" '" .. '" "" -3 ~ u " H .. "'" 'U '" .... ~ "'''''''' 0...."" ........ r.. b~tj o :¡: "'.. - ... ...... vA... -"" '" UO" ..... ... Cl '" '" o H ,.> ",,·i 0'" o ...... ...... u '0 , .. ........ ~'" ".' .... o o S "" ..... .-- " ..... '" V .... ... ., n. '" o CO ~ o "" ..... .... 'U " .., ... .. '" ~. o o N ..... o "" ..... rl ,.. '" " " " ... ~ ~ '" ~ "" H r.. r.i" ~ .., H n. H r.. .., .." V ., '" ~ ..... ... "' .., I ,.... H 5 0'" uz H ..,U H"; ur.. Sg; '" :;;~ ., u ., n o ., '" . .. ¡¡¡... 8~ o -.... ., .... '" Cl .... ,.. ... ... '" H U) -'U o ....... c... "v On. !i! µ 0- " '" "' <V .....µ µ" ..... <V µ .. ~ "-t "''' g.u ..... .. µ o H OJ U ....... U ... "'P. H µµ ".... o ~ u"" ... ..... " "" ., µ .. A o .... "' " o ..... :> '" ... "" .... '" .' o H "' " o ..... :> '" ... "" µ " " o .'\! ... .... µ " '" " 0< '-' - - = 0 Cl 0 rl rl ~ o m N '" Cl ú) ,'- CO <"l Cl N <") r- o rl ..... ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ::..: CO Cl CO Cl ~ ~ ..... ..... ... .-- ~ ~ , on .... "" CO (Y") r- .....-1 ..q' .... ~ ("-) ":I" <") ..... ~ ,- o '" N '" CO on rl o w ~ ~ CO ~ <") .... N ~ CO :;;: - '"' 6 ..... ~ '" an N :2 <") do, CO .... CO <") ~ N U) ú) <") <") '" .... CO CO <") .... .,. .... ~ I , o CO <>0 CO ,- ~ .-- ~ t-· a·~ on '''l ..... '" "" "" "" o ~~ 0 CO a co ..... rl rl CO '" ..... '" ú) ~ ~ , N rl .... co <") '" "') '" co an '" an ~ CO co co "" o .-, co CO U) '" U) a "" , o <") .-- "" rl N rl a '" ..... Cl ..... o N o <:;> U) "'" co o "" , a a <") .... '''l ~, ~ N 0) .-- N .... '" ..... , ~ u, ~ co "'" .... ..... .-- .-- N '" ..... ~. <") '" ... ~ '" <") o co ..... <Yo ~ "'" .... CO a ... ~ -,. a co LDI.DC)C)OC)O (y)f""ì<DOOQO I~\..oo~m 00 ('-.I 1..0 of) r-- N "-r' 0 cnNNrooOO'l (J:). ........ M _ <'.\ ..n ~ ~ "".-t 0 rl (V) ..... N ~ ~ ~ ~ ... .-- <Yo CO a '" 0) m C>J ("'.,\ N 0 <Yo '" .-- o a <") ,n "'" '" N <") <") 0000 ..--1 .....-t ( () (V) ":I" """" r-- .- z z o 0 .... H a a a a ... ~ ..... rl ... ... "'" on 0·-1 .--1 ,.... '" a a :::' ... r· ... CO '" ..... u, ~ ~ ,.... '" a o co ..., co rl '" a '" '" U) a an a o rl r.. H a a '" '" '" C> an '" '" .... N '!, '" ..... o 0 U) on '" rl ... H a a N '" ~. '" ... U A H H ~ ~.~ In 0 ~ '" "" '" <.9 o~ ø.. Z H H H '" '" ~ [--t f·-t o VI UI ~ ~ u 8 n. .---. ....... I:a.o E: 0::: µ... þ.", k. ~lfY)rl~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ H A 1~~H~P-In.H ~ ~ H ~ ~: H H t: t: !i! c.: ~ ~ ~ -------------- fjj µ H v a o u .... ~ '" "" :{.l a '" ..... H .., > "" H .... ~ '" ~ a o Ñ a o ...; o o o o ..., a a CO - o a ,--I '" ..... o ..... rl ... <") a N CO w <") '" .., o co rl o ~ .-- ..... ..... , o co .-- a :ij C> '" ::..: a .... .... ~ "" ... H a o ..... CO ~ r· N N .., ~ '" .... '" a a "" o o rl '" <Yo ,,., "" '" .... CO .... ... , r- ..., '" co N ~ '" '!' U) "" N m N .., ~ W rl '" 0) ..., co <Yo .... .., .... .... U H .... ~ H "" ~ '" '" H , '" .., CO .,; </l m .., ::c "" o a rl "" a o rl "" a ~ C> '" an o N a CO = a N a a a a ..... ;;¡ o o ,.... ,.... ~ o (f) tIl Ul ~ c.:I ~ CO '" '" ~ ~ ...:( Ul </l '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q n.. 0... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0. 0.. 0.- (f) (f) [f) III -------- H Z .., ::c .., ~ .....'" '" ~~ HH 'U .Q'" """ </l</l o N '" N = ~ r- ~ = <") <") , ~ ..... N ..... "" - <") - <") "" ..., - ..... ~ a N '" = o o = a '" '" o = ,..; I aoo o = C> qo .... Ñ li> :'\ a a a a a a ~ U) "" N C'> '-'l 0 N m C'., \D Li1 o "-7' 0.:. 01 (~q'C)O Q:;;;l c<) '"'I ....-i "" ð C":) 0 .---j r-- C) 0\ ("') ("I "" ~ ~ on 0 ..... ... H = C> <:;> '" 0' ..; .., o o ,..; . ~. N ~ o ~ .., U. H '" .... '" LJ H ... ... ~ H 0-=>00 o C'> 0 0 .,; co ..... - o o ..... ..... '" <Yo o ..... ''l u, '" o d a a a a ..... = o rl C> a o N U) 0' C> rl ;;¡ o o ..... ..; §! o u rl rl - o C> ... ~ N <") "" "'" .... "" -:0 ~ ...." ~ a o rl "" o o ..... tv) l"') 0 n ~ ,.---t w 0'\ r-..-tOluï O'l. (VI 00 a r-- ri I.D O"l ON""", N '" r- <") ..... .... .... , CO <Yo "" r- CO ~ ~ ..... ~ o '" <Yo ~ N M ,y, ~ .... ... '" "" A .....'" mo µ 0.., ....'" .§~ "'u <") ... r- '" ... o ~ ..... o 0 o co ~ on ro 0 ;ri ~ U) <") ~. U) <"l ~ d ro U) ~ <") a C> ~ r- '" ~ = N ~, ..... o 0 C\- "I .1 m "'" "'<t' r- N N M "" Z o H ~ an rl '" ~ <") H ~ "" ~ M " </l <") rl ..... <") .... N r- rl U) o ,,--.. ,--I ~, ..., co o "" .... .... <") ..... :::' ,---j 6 "" ú) a ... .... <"l '" H .., :0- '" H .... ~ "" :.';! <") , Vl a co '" an li> ... "'. = -:0 = C> a ..... ;<:' ~ -:0 C> o ,.... ~? .... C> o o co '" w .., ,". <") ,.. V) o o o ..... ;<:' ~ U H '" ~ t... l'> Z H to.. o o '" '" '" '" H &:i - -:0 o rl Cl 0> U) o '" N o 0 0 o 0 0 o o 0'> u, a <Yo N o o 0'> '" C> 0'> ..... o 0 o 0 = <Yo U) a '" N ooC> C) "-D .0 r-t C'.J ,-I .... H o o 0' '" o '" N A H H o Ul .., '" :;:! H </l ~ ... r.. ;i1 H "" Cl o rl an ~ '" '" ~ - = r- li> 0'0 o ~ ~ o o M a .., <Yo CO d o o ..., co '" 0, '" ..... = r- '" '" o ~ - .... H o o <") o '" <Yo .., ..... "" "" H '" H </l U H ,., .... ;ii H A .., '" ~ ~ '" H 0.. 0.. H .-=1 >-I >I ~ 0 E-i E-t U. H {f} tIl ------------ ""'" qt ...-t rl ...... ....... C'>oC'>ooa .....; Ñ ..;. &rl w r--" "" a co d '*' -:0 o rl ~ '" r- "" "'" N - on a o o o o ~ rl o .... '" .... <") "'" ..... - ú) o o co a o .,. d = = co a = '" ..... '" '" .... CO = = m .~ ,,., '" ..... g ~ 0'> .-- ,.., U) ..... - "'" = = = o o ... .... r.. H = = an m ~, '" CO rl ,.) '" H '" H </l U H ... r.. ;:¡ H ..... '" µ o H , -§ Ul ¡ '" '" , '" '" <U '" >< .... :z ::> 0'-" uz H "'U Ho« U.... "''''' ...."" If) ¡;;l;l "" u ~. 0.... ~u "'OJ u·~ I 0 ....... ~'" . '" µ 8~ ° "".... ... '" .... ~ .~, .... on .., ~ o ....d ~ ~, "'''' 0", ~ on '" dµ .... C d", ....... C ... '" '" 50U .... <U .... o .... '" U µd U ... fUll, ... +J ...l Cd Oc U::> :;;! ~ U ¡::¡ H H . '" H ~ UJ 0 N ~ if} ~ ~ i:4Þ1n.n. ~ e: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H 0::; a:: E'i 1:--1 L'J t'J l'J I2-l E-t f-I Vl (f) ~ 0<:( ~ :3 VJ U} u u ~ ~ ~ :; ~~~EE~~~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H Q 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ æ æ re -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ '" .... '" o o .... '" '" o rl > ., ... '" '" .... o .... on '" o ·rl > '" .... '" .... " '" j .> d C '" .... rl .... a ,. 50 ~ oJ H "" .- '" .., ê o .., '-" ~ u ., o u ~, o I , '" ~ = N '" '" '" ,., '" .---l lJ"') C) ú) ~ ,., .... "" N r- .... .... ("1 P'l , '" N '" .... ú) .... r- ,., <=> <=> ,.!. '" ú) ú) ú) ::: ,!. '" ú) ú) ~ ~ o o , , '" .... N '" '" ,., .... '" ú) .... ~ ,., r- .... ,., ..... ;:; .p N ,., :z :z o 0 >< E-~ E-i U) , , r-rl<=> '" ú) '" ú) .... ...... ú) r-- f""- ú) '" r- rl '" ú) ~ ~ ~ '" ::! "" , If) ú) <=> ~ "" o ~ '" ,., ~ ,., rl "" <=> 0 <=> <=> 0 0 , ~ ..., ~ r- '" '" , ~ ..., ,-, ...... '" '" o 0 o 0 o ~ .~ N ~1 ... .., >- "' .... ~ '" ::! ,., I If) ú) ~ <=> 0 N "" "" <=> :=: '" '" '" <=> ,., ~ o '" ...... ...... .- ~ o ." ..... :::: ..., .... '" '" '" ú) '" '" <=> .... "" '" N .... rl ~ ...... '-' "" <=> :=: '" ..., '" .... '" .... N ..., '" rl '" .... o o .... ...., ,., <D o o .... '" ..... '" o co o ..... ...... >< If) o o ~ N ,., '" N N = 0 .... ú) "" o o rl o .... rl ... N 01 o .... -+ ..... N '" o "" o o .... rl ,., ...., "h "" "" .... rl ,., N "" "" 0 o <=> , o ('-,I lfl .... '" ,., rl N '" ..... rl '" N== O. 0'1 ...n ú) o o rl .... H o o ;:'; ~1 '" '" "" "" , N '" '" rl = "" ..., I N N ~ = '" ..... o 0 "" "" I o o ..... ~ <:> <:> M N . , ~77'+--·- o 0 "" C'> 0 0 ...... '" .... .... C'> <D o ..... "" C'> '" rl M ,., N '" '" '" .... H , "" <=> ...... ~ "" o "" N N "" w "" "" "" rl ..., .., w '" = ú) ..., "" '" '" = ..., o "" C'> "" '" .... "" '" ,., ..... '" rl ..... , o "" a ..0 C> ~ .... H C'> o '" n M 0, M N rl <=> <=> ...... ." "" "" :=: .... '" ,., ,., M ú) .... N ...., M M ..., "" 0 C'> 0 .... ...., ..... ..... M ..., :=: '" ~1 .... H <=> o ~ '" ,., rl "" o "" o , N '" , o '" = "" N ~ ~ ,., , , N 0 N '" ~ ." ~ "" ..... N o o , o C'> W , o "" Ñ , , , "" 0 0 <=> <=> <=> ~ N .....; <=> <=> <=> <=> , I I ("'- c.> N ...., '" ..., .... ." '" ~ <=> <=> "" N rl = <=> 0 ...... = '" ..... ..... ú) r- ~. 0'1 ..., 0 = rl rl <;'j , C> o W <;'j I C> C> N ~ ~ >< ~ o rl <=> m .... <=> o rl "" co I N ú) '" o .... , N ..., m <=> .... C> 0 <=> 0 , C> o = o <;'j , o o rl .0: In :>: o u .... o ~. .... "" <=> ,.!. '" .., '" o rl rl ...... ,.!. ...., <"l <D o rl rl r- , ...... ...., "" '" o rl rl ,- N '# '" .., ¡::¡ rl '" mo ., o ~, .... '-" ~8 "" "" :=: N '" o .... .... ..., C> C> N N '" ú) "" C> rl ~, .... .... ..., ..., o o ~ o C> co <=> rl ...., ..., o .... .... ú) C> ,., u, c-. .., .... u, en H C> = .... '" ::> o u VI ~ .., .... .., ~ .0: ,.., Z ,.., '-" '" H -~ <:> C> N ~. ,...., "" co :=: "" <:> C> .... N ú) :=: ~ ú) N o ,- ~ ." o '" = rl o o o o ". = 1'- ~ = o '" = .-< N ..., = rl .... ..., ...., o r- .,. '" o <D "" .... rl ," ., o .... , .0 '" en on rl m .... o .... 'Ö C m ... '-" .' HOV-07-01 WED 03:45 ~.. HIGHWAY VALETS ÎNC . " '-' FAX NO. 1 407 321 631~ "'" P. 02/05 WAIVER AND .RELEASE OF LIEN UPON ~:rNAL PAYMENT The undersigned lienor, amount of $ 10 00 claim a lien for labor, Dickerson Florida, Inc. St. LUcie County described ~operty= in consideration of the final payment in the hereby waives and releases its lien and right to services or materials furnished to (customer) on the job of (owner of property) , to the following st. Lucie County Resurfacing DFI j13299 1/·· -1 , 2001 Dated Lienor's Name Highway val.ete, Ine:. Address 600 Hickman Circle Sandf'ord, FL 32771 By Printed Name Personally ap?~red fore me by Ill) t./ I¡:;#~ that he/she is who is pe:r:sonaily known to 1lI8. this 'ri tle: -Fi'V <-1 day of . ,2001 who,being duly sworn on oath, says of Highway Valets, Inc. i''";!..'\. !l.arlmra Ellis ~.: * My Cornmia;lonCC953S63 Not&.!: S . -:y ,,~Exr,rKAugusl14.2004 ·=?:>-:i~~ ct5J Notary gnature Noto: This i8 a statutory fo~ prescribed by Section 113.20, Florida Statutes (1996) Effective OCtober 1, 1996, a person may not require a lienor to furnish a waiver or release of lien that is differ9nt from the statutory form. '- ...." DICKERSON FLORIDA, INC. Post Office Drawer 719 Stuart, Florida 34995 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO St Lucie County Brd of Comm 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Date: 22-Jan-02 Job No.: 13289 Attention: PM Powers Reference Bid No 01-003 Phone: (561) 287-6820 Fax: (561) 287-4660 FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE..... [Xl Attached Copies 1 Pay Reauest #6 1 Change Order #3 1 Final Lien Release from HíQhwav Valets (fax) REMARKS COpy TO: SIGNED: $~g_~ file: xIl TRTRANS ~ 888 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 888 8 iii ill iii ~ ª ..."", " gggggggggggggggg :l ~ ~ iii Õ :g ~ '" :: ... .. g ~ å ! ~ · · 000000 ~ 0°88°00000 ! ~J dó ~ ~ & · 0 .. = 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ 8 = 8 8 8 8 888 ~ iii ~ ~ = ~ 0 . I ... ~a~sa~~a~a:;¡:aagg.g :i ~ ~ :i :i ~~t aa ~ a :: ~ ~ ~ !-Bo.... ... a · · o 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ! 1 i ~ ø e ~ "i " ~ ~ & . · 0 .. ~ ~ ~ 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 888 8 8 0 ~ ~ ; 5 ~ · · ~ j_ iiga~aaaaaaaaaaa ~ · ~ i ~ ~ 10. ". ¡~~~;( ü ;!Ì ~ ~ ....0.:;: ~ ~ ~ I<lU8:¡O uuaua ! ·11 Ñ~S°": Ogl;lOOOQQ & ""_ "'!. N ~ " . . 0 .. ~ ~~88~~~aaaaaaaaa · " ; ~ !; ¡; · ~ J~~~~~~~~aaaaaaaa ~ m ~ ~ :;] ~~ ~::i~ ! ~ ª "!. ~ Ii ~&t!.... ......~ g :;: · · ! ~.-OO"''''NOOO 000000 ~:i~~ ~~~ · :5 g 2 .... .... ~ ~ it. 0 ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~88~~~ ~ N N . :;¡ N i . ... i ~aa~~g~aaaaaaaaa ¡¡, I ,.; iii ~ i ~ Itl. rt «t M ~ i " I-A.~ a~ $ ~ ª :¡ ::i w ;¡ : :;: N · · f~ooi~5~oOOOO 0000 ! .~ ",,- ~. ¡go ~ '" " & - 0 .. . ~ ill ~ 8 iii 8 888 8 8 8 a a 8 8 : :¡ : ~ Ii ~ i3 d ~ 0 ~ ~ ci ci ci d d d d 0 0 d d ~ Ii ~ s !!! i~~;~~~~""""----""""""-"" iii l-D.rn~¡t::4"" ã á ! ! ! ;xw · ! J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 11 !H ~ ~ i ::)i:!:: lil it. u ~ 8 iii : iii iii R ~ 8 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 8 ~ 8 · N ~ ,.. - œ - - ... ~ 0 0 ... a S a 0 s 0 ¡ 3 !S~~~~:-~a -M- .. - II M :x (OJ ..... .... &3::¡ .... ¡( ;!;;:a....-...-- û ~ ~ E ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ::)J~~aaaaaa~~$ð~~~~ ~ q~~W w~~~~_w rL. ww_...... 0 = ~&~~~§.~.Q~ IØQr.lQQ~Q ~N!;:8g~S "'~r.I" c W I- Ul l- I- W ::E ::> ::E a w w .. .. ... <.> ll! <:> ::> Ul I- -0: Q ::J Z 0> ..J Z ..J 0 W '0 ~ ~ ~ ¡:¡ '" ... '" c.. g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ N ~ N N g g '" ::> l-I-U'IU'1...J...J...J...J...Jwwwwwww '" .. <.> en c: 'ü r.. q! ~ u _ ..¡ ~i1~il:o.~ " HH:~~niHiiH ::1- ..J Ill;:: ~ O>'l: 0::£ ~ ... 0 " .:'.:'i~o!H~~n~~~ 0°0 .;, ~ ~ f'lr')~ ""U'IU'1 a. a. 11. 11. a. a. a. g: ~ S '¡''¡'~~¡HH~~~~~p ...Q~ !!~~~'=l-b~.f~I~AU'I! N ... ~~~~~~ õ '" Cl '" Cl. ~ - () Q) ..... o ... a.. C) c: .- () ns u 1: .5 :::s C'll II) "C Q) .¡: D::M£ O~C:Q) OO:::oro I W !!O O')C<Il"O 0') 0::: ~ (l) ~o~g.¡; W .... f- ", 00.- \..I........OCU .;.;Zí6;§ ál <c .... u .- .(5'.... c +:: "C ....~oo"C a. .....üz« '-' ii.i ~ c '¡: Ü:Q. OMNNCOOODv OlNCD O"'d" NmOT"" ¡g¡g~~N~¡:;jg;g LOC)MCOmMN (\ LÓr-:aiM-MlÓc:i of LOCO"'<tCOtl9-CON U!- N_ ~ tß- Eß- fß t.9- ;; M 'It Gl Ó ~ c.i II. ã)~CONNIl) c:nM(QLOC\lM cci~gCÓNg ;n~MIDC;CO ",£M('. --.:[m-t.Õ ~M~~~~ ~~ 00 ~ Ó M'" N aî ... CDCOOOCOOO T"" 000 <or--. r-m .....siggggg!~ ;t::_.......T"" COOMO':l c)·góN" ...f~-triÑ Q.N..... M"N'" e,j T""¡;; E19flR.~ ;; 0000000 0000000 dc:idcidció 69-uttl9-*b"t-~~ vNeS NNO<O ¡:j~ggj M (') N Lñ~ !2. ... gggggg888 dcicicici6cidci ~~~~tn-~6Ittn-* ì!t:!:df;~~~g88~g~ Cij dgoõ......r---:duico.¢óaj CQ)~N~~~;:~~tò~6")~ ·5.g8g~~ai'~~ g~ f.9 '¡: 0.. In LO U} 404 ;; fh o ...<1> ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ......C'"')NaJOO>O ~ ~ë~;:~~LO~~ N ¡:;: ~ ..- "l:t N o 0000000 o 0 o 0 o c:i ... ... NO It) 0 m ci o ... ~ 00 N 0 OOlOO cicimo fhfßOfh ;; rDNOJ....,.r::-O>'¢O(2;~o§:aOT""a ~€~_~~~;ggM ~ óæ;:~ti<ôg~sf c.ið £:!. T""OOMOJmoaaoooooa M ~g~2 u) r----mmm .q- ;e ~ N :!~g~C;ffiagcooNOO""O ~~q~~~ m 0 " 1õ ..... N "" ~ N ~ ., C/) "ê ë ., ü ~ '0 ëii eo. 't: ::l o ü ., 'i: c: ~ ~ '" 'i: 'ê :> .Q E ::l ., ;~~re~~ga; Noc.idcido(tj MU)-IIð~tß-fhu¡.W ... f"'-COO..-CONCO MCOM......f.OLOI.O rri~~~~g~ tß;n.;;~~;;fh c > > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro œ co ~ ~ ro ro (3.<ri<ri..J..J..J..J..Jwwwwwww " 'C: ~ ~ lL - ë OJ :!2 ~ IV C Õ ., E '" C/) ¿~~ :2~ ..;;>e-o.(j.ª, ." ...... .!' :.52 rJ) .¡:::¡ .s:: co U) (fJ :¡g~ 2i2i" _~ëE'C:~ ,., « o ) C/) êií 1-'" ch E 0) ,g,g 0. ~@~~~~N~ 1-::Ec..I-I-I-...N :., lu 0 ~ >-..J' 0 ~ a:: à:: J: gwz ü c(~9~~ o 0 E E Gl ., .c: .c: I-; I-;- o ) ., 0. 0. E E C/) C/) Q) (J) ( ) Q) Q) æO)oO)Cl co CQ C'iJ m ro en en (/) en U) U') en (/) en U) Q) CD Q) Q) ( ) ::;: ::;: ::;: ::;: ::;: ËËËËË c.. c.. c.. c.. c.. ~ -g ~ ~ E ëi 8 o ) 0) ., '" 0) ., ., ., ., ., ::;: ::;: Ë Ë c.. II. <O< : «al ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ëii '0 '0 2i 2i c/)c/) ëã ro ro ëõ ro 'õ 13 13 'õ 13 Q) Q) ( ,) Q) Q) Q. Co C. Q. a. C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) üDWlL M ('I') M ("') ...."", ONN "., It) 0 cD ó r---: ~ ::¡: ;;¡; LÔlÓÒ It) ... <0 ~ tq. ;; 0 M ..... N <0 O. ... ;:: ~ 8 d o o å o "- ;; (') N m OJ " <D <0 ~- ;; 13 III .... ë o ü (õ .S .:: o (õ Õ f- .... .E (õ Õ f- E ::l ..J ~ ci c.i ('oj ~ ~ ...- o ..... ..... <0- o Q) en en a.. ,. / ~ ....,., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2g DATE: February 6, 2002 TO: Board of County Commissioners SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Public Works - Env. Res. REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[X] PRESENTED BY: Anna Smith SUBJECT: Permission to advertise for Manatee Protection Plan Public Hearing on February 26th, 2002. BACKGROUND: On January 15th, 2002 the Board directed staff to schedule a public hearing meeting on the Manatee Protection Plan in the month of February. Staff proposes to run both legal notices and general ads in local newspapers prior to the February 26th, 2002 4pm meeting. FUNDS AVAIL.: 001-3920-549000-7108 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for permission to advertise the Manatee Protection Plan Public Hearing on February 26th, 2002. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) ~'-- Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget_ Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy cr,,}, if applicableL Elf. 5/96 ;, Í' '-" ~ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: S. Ann Smith, Ecosystems Supervisor DATE: January 30, 2002 SUBJECT: Permission to advertise for Manatee Protection Plan Public Hearing on February 26th, 2002. BACKGROUND On January 15th, 2002, the Board directed staff to schedule a public hearing on the Manatee Protection Plan in the month of February. Staff proposes to run both legal notices and general ads in local newspapers prior to the February 26th, 2002 4pm meeting. RECOM MENDA TION/CONCLUSION Staff recommends approval for permission to advertise the Manatee Protection Plan Public Hearing on February 26th, 2002. Respectfully submitted, S. Ann Smith Ecosystems Supervisor Attachment: General Ad ¡. ! ~ Z <C ...J 0- Z o c:: ¡:: «UJU UJ:CUJ :Cl-~ UZO -00:: ...J 0- m w :J UJ 0- l- e:( Z <C ~ (J z - ~ .... V\ 'Q) 0 c::N..t:o o"'m WO"'N Z N C , O '", '- ~ '- 0 - '- Q) ° V\C.c_ ~::s Ell. lIIll:::,- "U .,e;..cc,- ~ Q)..t: .- OLl.u'= U '"I- s:: ' o 0 x > .s::. .- Q)s:: +' \0 '" ~ N .~ s:: :J Q) E« O..t:EO) .., 0 s:: U 'u'- ~ "U · Ll. C ~=.g O "U .., ~ ._ '" s:: ,..,.. '- Q) ....... 0 Cl ~ ::s s::- C::t-°ou. ,.- u._, ........ s:: Q)o Q) o 0 ._ '- ~ ,..,.. "' u ~ Q) ....... \J' ::s '" ._ s:: .- a. > .- -J s:: t- ~ .'-.., z31~.§õ :JEQ),.-u. O ..t:........... 0'" ~Q) u .- s:: ~ ::s W ~ .- s:: c -a. :~Q) u"'Eo::> :J C o.·u« -J Q) C · 32 0 'ü 'ë t- 0 0 ~ ._ V\..t: .. -J 0) Q) = ~ ..= .J: .- .., ~ :> t-3cV\ C 3 Ö oQ)-o .!l: '5 .¡: uQ).Q ':'=I-u. U 0 .. ..... Q) v . Q) I- - Q) ::> .0 ._ 000. =~ å 0 0 u ::> U. Q) 0 .- .. u 0 Q.) ::s ~ ::s ::¡:¡ 0 t: ~ '" Q) 3 .- ::> 31:« :> Q) 0 ::;> E .- .. ::s C ..... .- o u ~ o ._ .0'0:> Q) 4: 0 300 Q) I- m .!:'ON ..... Q) .. .t:"µ C ..µ s:: 0..... Q) o E ~ :>.~ .0 a. 0 o 0 a. = U Q) 0«0 ::> o tñ..D: '" s:: l- t- .- 0 .....'O~ CO:;:> Q) Q) v E.t::.= :: .0 ::s s:: ::s uOo. 0_ '0 0. :>. ..µ 4: s:: t: o .2 ::s I- "Ö 0 'OQ)u ..... Q.) Q) 0 ._ .!: I- U ..... 0. ::s .....Q.)....J o Q) .¡..Î :>. ..... V\ a. 0 Q.) oC.t: U 0 ..µ ~ s:: «::: -- ....", ~ c:: ·2 ~ . ..- t .. t -= l:I t. ~ S ":' ~ ~ ~ e t 2 it "" AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO. C-3-A ~ DATE: February S, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Purchasina Michael Rath. Purchasino Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-026, Purchase of One (1) 15,000# GVWR F-450 SD Cab & Chassis BACKGROUND: On January 9,2002 bids were opened forthe Purchase of One 1S,OOO# GVWR F-4S0 SD Cab & Chassis for the Solid Waste Division. Seven hundred twenty (720) vendors were notified, twenty-seven (27) bid documents were distributed and six (6) bids were received (tabulation attached). The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Don Reid Ford, for a total price of $31,830 (see attached memorandum). FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account No.: 401-3410-564000-300 EQ No.: 02-139 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-026 for Purchase of One 15,000# GVWR F-450 SD Cab & Chassis to Don Reid Ford, for a total price of $31 ,830. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [xl APPROVED [] DENIED [ l OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) ~L- Doug Anderson County Administrator County Attomey: (X) 01 V:.r Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget (X) JtJ tV! rrrq Other: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) Other: ~ Originating Dept: Finance: (Check br Copy only, if Applicable) Elf. 1/97 '-" ....., , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SOLID WASTE DIVISION MEMORANDUM 02-105 ~. ";<f"'H",'y,,", ,t",/,' ..."';'''~·'''''I'""m' .,f""..."V\~'··:'··~'C'.':·'" ,'-"."" ":>\,,,'¡-.' '",*,.",;¡~ "':R.i'''''''' "",":'" .......j"..~ '.' ·"".T';····~,.,·,···"·,,',·,·,,.¡, ,....'^'" .',\:\<,,,.'" .. ",. .",.... ",'.: '. ,,",,,,,,,,.,,.n;.,' FROM: Mike Rath, Purchasing Manager Leo J. Cordeiro, Solid Waste Managerce. TO: DATE: January 16, 2002 RE: Bid # 02-026 15,000# GVWR F-450 SD Cab & Chassis I have reviewed the bids received forthe aforementioned and recommend award to the low bidder, Don Reid Ford in the amount of $31,830. LJC:dls cc: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director .. 2 2 2'-" -, CD c: c: c: ., s: s: s: c.. III III III CD m m m 3 :;c :;c ::c 1lI 0 0 0 ::::s c.. 'TI 'TI 'TI (II III III n .. 1lI C C 0 ., n en c s: 0 :;c 0 "'C 3 > m n 2 n c: m m 3: < m en m 2 2 !;l C; 0 -t C :;; ëi5 ffi -t ~ ::c III c: -t m C ,. ..... N N Ø) ..... Cl 'TIen æ::I: 'TIen ~G) >3: 3:0 ;-;-1 <m ;-;C 3:> "'Cc: >0 ,,> ffi:;O ~z ,,-1 °ï -tZ ñi3: ~~ m:;o >0 "ï >:;0 ~s: :;c- -=n:;o ~- IIlm Oen ~z 2m ~m 3: JT1m '''' 'TI» c_ ~O ;'0 'TI» 'TI"T1 0 ....x ....z nc: ....0 :;0 ", ....", %- 0 c: ~ "0 :::c 0 0 ", 'TI3: 0 :;0 :;0 » ....m n 0 0 n z , -I -I 0 n < . m m c: :;0 z z æ m -I 0 Z Z ~ 0 G) > :::c ï en ï " n ï 0 :::c "0 0 :;0 > :::! 0 Z -fit -fit ~ -fit -fit -fit W W W W W W .þ. .þ. w w ~ - m 1,.) N -= N - -= - (Ø N (Ø CQ ...... W 0 (Ø 01 N ...... ...... Q :... (:) Q Q ::.., Q Q Q Q Q Q Q . ""'¡O "0 m z m o .. c... » z c: )- :;0 -< ~ N Q Q N (ê) N .. W Q "0 3: "0"0 ~$ enn 0::I: C)- oen ~~ en'" -I> m_ Ol b Q Q ~ G) ~ :::c "T1 , .þ. 01 Q en o n » aJ Ro n ::I: > en en (ñ aJ o > :;0 o o " n o c: z ~ n o 3: 3: (ñen ~~ Oï Zc: mn :;0- cnm ,n o >c: ~~ ï > -I Õ z en :::J: m m -I aJ - o Q N I Q N en ~ c.. lXI' C C m c:: 8~ < m 0 '-' en "tI c:: -l ëñ :Þ =ti :;; m "tI Õ ;;a 3: Õ -l 3: z -l m :Þ :Þ ~ 3: m z -l 3: :-;t Z -l Õ 0 :-;t ;;a z c:: m z 0 :-:l ;I!: ::¡j ~ .¡:,., CI) lJ 111 ~ 0 §5 0 ëï;' ,...... r- 0 " <Xl lJ 5 r- I\,) (5' t..) ~ õ , 0 ~ ...... 0 ~ t..) (l) co 0 c: CI) .... lJ ;;: :0 (l) ~ ~ ..Q c: "5" c: 3 () (l) ^ ::3 , .... tl en ~ § -I ::::: m;'" ëil r- " :0 °c Õ) ~ Sn 0 (l) :0 .,,- QJ =:m en ~ mn (l) zO ~ 111 -IC o' rn ::oZ (l) =-- CI) m:;! c: 0 Om ;>;- s I· Co QJ rn» .... ~ ~ -1::0 ~ ::::: z :Þ ;;a "TIC 0- m "tI m 00 0 (l) ~ "tI 0 0 ...... ;;a 0 ::O"TI 0 0 ;;a 0 3: "TIn c:: & m < 3: Cño Z "tI m QJ > C m OC -l è; Z Z 0 0 c »Z c is: m m ~:;! 3: QJ 3: c IXI ::3 m mn m Q. z »0 ~ ëï;' :-:l ::o=: S· N=: ::3 0_ (l) oen (l) ....en Q. 0 ~- .... 00 0 :0 ~ ~ oZ .¡:,., 0 ~ Nm 0 ::3 CI) CI) ...... en ::0 , ill en t..) ::3 .¡:,., .... () ...... ëil 111 0 I " ~ CJ1 Cl ~ ~. <: 0 - 0 0 , t..) 0 0 i I I , I _...- - - --. t * "'-' z z j, , CD c: c: c: ., š:: š:: š:: Q. OJ OJ OJ CD m m m 3 ;;C ::c ::c Dl ~ 0 0 0 Q. "TI "TI "TI III !!! OJ (') - Dl C 0 :'" C n en C š:: 0 ::c "'D 3 0 :Þ m (') ~ (') c: m š:: m <: m en m z z !=? -I 0 en -I c ;¡ ëñ m -I ~ ::c æ c: -I m c .:" ~ Q) W N co "'tJ ï :þ ("') :þ QO "'tJ ~ Z "'tJ m (i) ~ >< m 0 :2 ~ en :::0 Z m ~ :þ ::t Z ï :þ m m ("') :::0 In m en ï ("') - ~ m Z 0 < P -t s: m "'tJ m s: :þ Z en Z 0 -< 0 - :::0 Z en p Z 0 -t OJ -t - 0 0 - m w m 0 en I >< - :::i - ("') U1 .þ. m ..... s: OJ m OJ OJ ~ C 0 C C ~ ..... ~ en m - 0 Z Z Z m OJ m m 0 en c en en m en ~ en en ï 0 Z 0 0 <: ~ m ~ ~ m en ~ en en en en 0 :::i ~ s: en m o ~OJ "'tJ <:þ m ~ï Z en- m OZ o ï(i) ë~ c.. ~;ij :Þ :þm Z en C -t :Þ m ~ - s» I\) o o I\) (ê) I\) .. w o "'tJ š: OJ -to :þ:Þ OJ:::O cO ïO ~"en -("'):-1 OOï ZCC enZ("') J:~m m("')("') ~OO _š:C: DJŠ:Z ëCñ~ oen 1\)- _0 Oz \'IJm 00:::0 en AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO. C-3-B DATE: February 5, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasina Deoartment Michael Rath. Purchasina Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Not-For-Profit Entity to Develop and Operate a Wildlife Rehabilitation/Hospital/Sanctuary at Indrio Savannahs Natural Area. BACKGROUND: The Indrio Savannahs Natural Area contains 500 acres with a series of hiking trails, observation tower, boardwalks, an unimproved parking lot, two picnic tables and lake. Within a one half- acre parcel is a 50' x 66' two story concrete warehouse and attached 16' x 66' office (approximately 4,400 square feet). Electric, water and sewer is provided to the building. This structure, including a 50 +/- foot radius around the building is the proposed location of the Facility. The State of Florida (FCT) is our partner with the acquisition of the site and may be used by a not-for-profit entity. Any revenue received that exceeds the operating expense of the facility must go to the County towards the maintenance of the site. The intent of this RFP is to select a not-for-profit entity to develop and operate a Wildlife Rehabilitation/Hospital/Sanctuary at this location which could be added to complement the current Management Plan. Any permanent changes to the Management Plan may be subject to approval by the Board of County Commission and the Florida Communities Trust FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise an RFP for a Not-For-Proflt Entity to Develop and Operate a Wildlife Rehabilitation/Hospital/Sanctuary at Indrio Savannahs Natural Area. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [xl APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) ~~ Doug Anderson County Administrator ~/. Coordination/Signatures County Attomey.(X) Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) r; !1,,1\~ :''¡ ÌI'-.j Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Other: Other. Elf. 1/97 '-'" AGENDA REQUEST IT~ NO. C-3-C DATE: February 5,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Michael Rath, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to Pre-Qualify Contractors for Additions and Modifications to the St. Lucie County Correctional Facility Security Systems. BACKGROUND: Sims Wilkerson Engineering's sub-consultant Vitetta Inc., performed a comprehensive Security System Assessment for the St. Lucie County Correctional Facility. The results of this assessment prompted the County to have the facilities security and fire alarm systems upgraded and replaced. In an effort to obtain qualified contractors to ultimately bid for this project, it was determined that a Request for Qualifications should be issued to limit the bidding of the project to only contractors who are experienced and qualified in the this highly specialized scope of work. Upon receipt of the qualifications statements from contractors, an evaluation committee will review and score the submittals based upon the contractors experience, previous similar projects, staffing, work plan, service personnel, warranty service and bonding capacity. A recommendation will be made to the Board of County Commissioners that only those contractors who are deemed qualified shall be permitted to bid the project. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval forthe request for permission to advertise a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to Pre-Qualify Contractors for Additions and Modifications to the St. Lucie County Correctional Facility Security Systems. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) ~--c Doug Anderson County Administrator County Attorney.(X) Originating Dept: Finance: (Check br Copy only. if Applicable) jcÝ Coordination/Signatures Mgt & Budget: Other: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) ~ Other: Eff.1/97 '-" AGENDA REQUEST 1T!1e1 NO. C-3-D DATE: February 5, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Purchasino Department Michael Rath. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise for bids for Herbicides, Pesticides and Fertilizer for St. Lucie County and the Treasure Coast Purchasing Co-Operative. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this bid is for the purchase of various Herbicides, Pesticides and Fertilizer for County Departments. After discussing the need for this bid with several Treasure Coast governmental agencies, it was determined that it would be advantageous to issue as a co-operative bid. This will benefit all participating agencies through increased volume, resulting in a cost reduction. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise a bid for the purchase of Herbicides, Pesticides and Fertilizer. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) r/7~~ Doug Anderson County Administrator County Attomey.(X) .j} Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & BUdget~ ffirQ~ Other: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) Other: ;tß- Originating Dept: Finance: (Check br Copy only, if Applicable) Eff. 1/97 , , . , ~ AGENDA REQUEST IT~ NO. C-3-E DATE: February 5,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Purchasinq Michael Rath, PurchasinQ Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-028, Purchase of Baling Wire BACKGROUND: On January 16, 2002 bids were opened for the purchase of Baling Wire for the Solid Waste Division. Three hundred twenty-eight (328) vendors were notified, six (6) bid documents were distributed and four (4) bids were received (tabulation attached). This bid was issued as a "Spot Market Purchase" request, which due to the volatile pricing of steel does not lock a vendor to a set price for the term of the contract. Awarded vendors will be requested to submit facsimile price quotations (Spot Market Pricing) for Baling Wiring as needed by the Baling Facility. Bidders desiring to provide quotations were to indicate that they could meet or exceed the specifications. Failure by the vendor to respond to two (2) consecutive requests for quotations will be cause for them to be removed for the remainder of the contract period. The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the four (4) vendors listed on the attached tabulation that have indicated that they can meet or exceed the specifications. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Solid Waste Operating Supplies Account No.: 401-3410-552000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-028 for Purchase of Baling Wire to Cavert Wire Company, Inc., Apex Pinnacle, L&P Wire-Tie Systems and pango Sales, Inc. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: k] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) 9~( Doug Anderson County Administrator County Attomey:(X) 3J. Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget (Xl lAI -'h') ~ Other. Purchasing Mgr.: (Xl Other: (.~ Origina~ng Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eff.1/97 '-" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ~Il DATE: February 5, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: Treasure Coast Health Council Representative BACKGROUN D: See attached letter from Barbara Jacobowitz, Executive Director of the Treasure Coast Health Council requesting that the Board consider the appointment of Mr. Lawrence Brooks, as the Consumer Representative for the Treasure Coast Health Council. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Consider staff recommendation to appoint Mr. Lawrence Brooks to the Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc. as the Consumer Representative. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) r(2r;-L Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 BOARD OF DIRECTORS EDWARD H. FISCHMAN, D.P.M Chair CHRISTOPHER H. COFFEY Vice-Chair TRUD! WEBB, D.B.A. Sec:retarylTreaaurer D. RICHARD CLAASSEN, Ph.D. LILLIAN DE CICCO FAYE A. HAVERLOCK JOAN L. JOHNSON NORMA SCHATTNER LILLIAN A. TAMAYO ~ BARBARA H. JACOBOWITZ, M.S. Executive Director LISA G. McWHORTER, M.S. Deputy DirectorlContract Adminiltretor SARA-ELLEN BLAKE. B.A., B.S. Adminiatrative Auistantl CON Progrem Director MARY BRUBCINO Office Auiatant BARBARA FEENEY, M.P.A Heelth Planner ANDEE HASBROOK TCHC FíaoeI Grants Coordinetor KYMBERLEY LUCAS, M.P.B. PBC TíUe II Contract Adminiltrator ELAINE JOHNSON Traaaure Cout CIerklData Proceuor PAM NEAL, A.A. Trau..... C_ Au_ Cøotracl Admlnlolrator ANNETTE T. SPARLING, M.H.A. T........ C_ Health PIlm_ AND PBC HIV CARE COUNCIL STAFF January 23, 2002 Ms. Diane Turner Assistant to the County Administrator St. Lucie County Administration 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 300 Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Dear Ms. Turner: As required under Section 408.033, Florida Statutes, I am contacting you with regard to a request for an appointment to the Board of Directors of the Treasure Coast Health Council. Currently, St. Lucie County is represented by Dr. D. Richard Claassen under the "provider" slot and there remains an open "consumer" slot. In the Council's current contract with the Department of Health, we are required to aggressively pursue individuals to fill the open slots. Mr. Lawrence Brooks, a resident of Port St. Lucie, has expressed interest in being appointed to the Council's Board. I have taken the liberty of having our contract manager review his resume and I have received a verbal confirmation of his appropriateness for the consumer slot. Enclosed is a copy of Mr. Brooks' resume and a copy of the pertinent statute. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions at (561) 844-4220 ext. 25. Thank you very much for your prompt attention to this request. Sincerely, ,ð~¡/ Barbara H. Jacobowi Executive Director ___ _or' ~ . - ._--- - ---~ Enclosures ¡"'"",\ \ ~ ~, \ cc: Mr. Brooks JAN 2 4 ..: \,-_.....,_....>-- . SERVING INDIAN RIVER. MARTIN, OIŒECHOBEI, PALM BEACH AND ST.wcm--C-ðmmiS·'- -.-..- ['i, .\:. ,~;:\l oc:<:",- ..o.o.w....- _" I"'''' ~.cn'.n__... .,.VV1..........UV"tVO.....~UUU U.;J.;J. V1WU~ .::lUUlHWJC rage: 1 Ul.. '-" ...,J s '¡¡:is hine.... \ SÙsfOA\ ee.~ \1.1¡isIilW~ \ Stnful( \ 1; Constl~uÌ'lon I ~t Order View Statutes Search Statutes Constitution Laws of Florida Select Year: 12001 i.J ~ The 2001 Florida Statutes Title XXIX Chapter 408 Public Health Health Care Administration 408.033 Local and state health planning.-- View Enth:e Chapter (1) LOCAL HEALTH COUNQLS.-- (a) Local health councíls are hereby established as public or private nonprofit agencies serving the counties of a district or regional area of the agency. The members of each councíl shall be appointed in an equitable manner by the county commissions having jurisdiction in the respective district. Each councíl shall be composed of a number of persons equal to 11/2 times the number of counties which compose the district or 12 members, whichever is greater. Each county in a district shall be entitled to at least one member on the council. The balance of the membership of the councíl shall be allocated among the counties of the district on the basis of population rounded to the nearest whole number; except that In a district composed of only two counties, no county shall have fewer than four members. The appointees shall be representatives of health care providers, health care purchasers, and nongovernmental health care consumers, but not excluding elected government officials. The members of the consumer group shall include a representative number of persons over 60 years of age. A majority of councíl members shall consist of health care purchasers and health care consumers. The local health council shall provide each county commission a schedule for appointing council members to ensure that council membership complies with the requirements of this paragraph. The members of the local health council shall elect a chair. Members shall serve for terms of 2 years and may be eligible for reappointment. (b) Each local health council may: 1. Develop a district or regional area health plan that permits each local health council to develop strategies and set priorities for implementation based on its unique local health needs. The district or regional area health plan must contain preferences for the development of health services and facílities, which may be considered by the agency In its review of certificate-of-need applications. The district health plan shall be submitted to the agency and updated periodically. The district health plans shall use a uniform format and be submitted to the agency according to a schedule developed by the agency in conjunction with the local health councils. The schedule must provide for the development of district health plans by major sections over a multiyear period. The elements of a district plan which are necessary to the review of certificate-of-need applications for proposed projects within the district may be adopted by the agency as a part of its rules. 2. Advise the agency on health care issues and resource allocations. 3. Promote public awareness of community health needs, emphasizing health promotion and cost-effective health service selection. 4. Collect data and conduct analyses and studies related to health care needs of the district, including the needs of medically indigent persons, and assist the agency and other state agencies in carrying out data collection activities that relate to the functions in this subsection. http://www.leg.state.B.uslStatutesI...ISEC033.HTM&:TItle=->2001->Ch0408->SectionO/02003 In/2002 lILIU.IlL~ Y l~W I3l.1U.U'---"'- ~\N 1 ~11V"tVo-l3",,"UU V",",. VlUUlC I3l.Ull11UJ1e . rllg~ ~ VI .. '-" ...; 5. Monitor the onsite construction progress, if any, of certificate-of-need approved projects and report council findings to the agency on forms provided by the agency. 6. Advise and assist any regional planning councils within each district that have elected to address health issues in their strategic regional policy plans with the development of the health element of the plans to address the health goals and policies in the State Comprehensive Plan. 7. Advise and assist local governments within each district on the development of an optional health plan element of the comprehensive plan provided in chapter 163, to assure compatibility with the health goals and policies in the State Comprehensive Plan and district health plan. To facilitate the implementation of this section, the local health council shall annually provide the local governments in its service area, upon request, with: a. A copy and appropriate updates of the district health plan; b. A report of hospital and nursing home utilization statistics for facilities within the local government jurisdiction; and c. Applicable agency rules and calculated need methodologies for health facilities and services regulated under s. 408.034 for the district served by the local health council. 8. Monitor and evaluate the adequacy, appropriateness, and effectiveness, within the district, of local, state, federal, and private funds distributed to meet the needs of the medically indigent and other underserved population groups. 9. In conjunction with the Agency for Health Care Administration, plan for services at the local level for persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. 10. Provide technical assistance to encourage and support activities by providers, purchasers, consumers, and local, regional, and state agencies in meeting the health care goals, objectives, and policies adopted by the local health council. 11. Provide the agency with data required by rule for the review of certificate-of-need applications and the projection of need for health services and facilities in the district. (c) local health councils may conduct public hearings pursuant to s. ~08.039(3)(b). (d) Each local health council shall enter into a memorandum of agreement with each regional planning council in its district that elects to address health issues in its strategic regional policy plan. In addition, each local health council shall enter into a memorandum of agreement with each local government that Includes an optional health element in its comprehensive plan. Each memorandum of agreement must specify the manner In which each local government, regional planning council, and local health council will coordinate Its activities to ensure a unified approach to health planning and implementation efforts. (e) local health councils may employ personnel or contract for staffing services with persons who possess appropriate qualifications to carry out the councils' purposes. However, such personnel are not state employees. (f) Personnel of the local health councils shall provide an annual orientation to council members about council member responsibilities. The orientation shall include presentations and participation by agency staff. (g) Each local health council is authorized to accept and receive, In furtherance of its health planning functions, funds, grants, and services from governmental agencies and from private or civic sources and to perform studies related to local health planning in exchange for such funds, grants, or services. Each local health council shall, no later than January 30 of each year, render -.... -------.....!-- _c....l.._ _~___;_..... __.I ......_L..._______&. _1:_.._'- L._...._ _.___~___.... '-__!........._ L'-_ _____.. ........_ bttp:/Iwww.leg.state.t1.uslStatutesl...ISEC033.HTM&TItle=->200I->Ch0408->Sectiono/02003 Inl2002 ...............-... # . ....... -.-.....-~ . ---.. r ___ ....._ # _vww_... ...."".1. ...............'W' ..... 'f..1òI."_~ ... ""2)" oJ V¿ -, '-' ..."j dll dt;t;OUI { f1Y 01 me ret;elp{ dllU UI~uur~elllem or ~U(; I rUIlU~ rl:!t;I:!IVI:!U uy I{ {U {lie dyel1t;y. IIII:! agency shall consolidate all such reports and submit such consolidated report to the Legislature no later than March 1 of each year. Funds received by a local health council pursuant to this paragraph shall not be deemed to be a substitute for, or an offset against, any funding provided pursuant to subsection (2). (2) FUNDING.-- (a) The Legislature intends that the cost of local health councils be borne by application fees for certificates of need and by assessments on selected health care facilities subject to facility licensure by the Agency for Health Care Administration, including abortion clinics, assisted living facilities, ambulatory surgical centers, birthing centers, clinlcaiiaboratories except community nonprofit blood banks and clinical laboratories operated by practitioners for exclusive use regulated under s. 483.035, home health agencies, hospices, hospitals, intermediate care facilities for the developmentally disabled, nursing homes, and multiphasic testing centers and by assessments on organizations subject to certification by the agency pursuant to chapter 641, part III, Including health maintenance organizations and prepaid health clinics. (b)l. A hospital licensed under chapter 395, a nursing home licensed under chapter 400, and an assisted living faCility licensed under chapter 400 shall be assessed an annual fee based on number of beds. 2. All other facilities and organizations listed in paragraph (a) shall each be assessed an annual fee of $150. 3. Facilities operated by the Department of Children and Family Services, the Department of Health, or the Department of Corrections and any hospital which meets the definition of rural hospital pursuant to s. 395.602 are exempt from the assessment required in this subsection. (c)1. The agency shall, by rule, establish fees for hospitals and nursing homes based on an assessment of $2 per bed. However, no such facility shall be assessed more than a total of $500 under this subsection. 2. The agency shall, by rule, establish fees for assisted living facilities based on an assessment of $1 per bed. However, no such facility shall be assessed more than a total of $150 under this subsection. 3. The agency shall, by rule, establish an annual fee of $150 for all other facilities and organizations listed in paragraph (a). (d) The agency shall, by rule, establish a facility billing and collection process for the billing and collection of the health facility fees authorized by this subsection. (e) A health facility which is assessed a fee under this subsection is subject to a fine of $100 per day for each day in which the facility is late in submitting its annual fee up to maximum of the annual fee owed by the facility. A facility which refuses to pay the fee or fine is subject to the forfeiture of its license. (f) The agency shall deposit In the Health Care Trust Fund all health care facility assessments that are assessed under this subsection and proceeds from the certlflcate-of-need application fees. The agency shall transfer to the Department of Health an amount suffldent to maintain the aggregate funding level for the local health councils as specified in the General Appropriations Act. The remaining certificate-of-need application fees shall be used only for the purpose of administering the Health Facility and Services Development Act. (3) DUTIES AND RESPONSIBIUTIES OF THE AGENCY.-- (a) The agency, in conjunction with the local health councils, is responsible for the coOrdinated "I,,"n;nn nf h''''llth "''''rø c:ørvlrøc: in thø c:t"'tø bttp:J/www.leg.state.fl.uslStatutesl...ISEC033.HTM&:Title=->2001->Ch0408->Sectiod%2003 1/7/2002 ~Ylew ~wur'" -~I.Wl..:>'\,;IlU4\AS~D Ujj: UDbDO :!)~ . . '-" t'age 4 ot 4 ...,J ",""'IU"I'~ VI ..........".. .......,..... .......... ................ ~...... -".......... (b) The agency shall develop and maintain a comprehensive health care database for the purpose of health planning and for certificate-of-need determinations. The agency or its contractor Is authorized to require the submission of information from health facilities, health service providers, and licensed health professionals which is determined by the agency, through rule, to be necessary for meeting the agency's responsibilities as established In this section. (c) The agency shall assist personnel of the local health coundls in providing an annual orientation to council members about council member responsibilities. (d) The agency shall contract with the local health coundls for the services spedfled in subsection (1). All contract funds shall be distributed according to an allocation plan developed by the agency that provides for a minimum and equal funding base for each local health council. Any remaining funds shall be distributed based on adjustments for workload. The agency may also make grants to or reimburse local health coundls from federal funds provided to the state for activities related to those functions set forth in this section. The agency may withhold funds from a local h~alth council or cancel Its contract with a local health council which does not meet performance standards agreed upon by the agency and local health councils. History.--s. 20, ch. 87~92; s. 40, ch. 88-380; s. 35, ch. 88-394; s. 1, ch. 89-104; s. 24, ch. 89- 294; s. 2, ch. 89-296; s. 15, ch. 89-527; s. 2, ch. 91-48; s. 22, ch. 91-158; 55. 2, 104, ch. 91- 282; s. 5, ch. 91-429; 55. 15, 17, ch. 92-33; s. 2, ch. 92-174; s. 66, ch. 92-289; s. 22, ch. 93- 120; s. 11, ch. 93-129; s. 33, ch. 93-206; s. 8, ch. 93-267; s. 9, ch. 95-144; s. 29, ch. 95-210; s. 3, ch. 95-394; s. 11, ch. 97-79; s. 1, ch. 97-91; s. 35, ch. 97-103; s. 62, ch. 97-237; s. 175, ch. 99-8; s. 4, ch. 2000-256; s. 5, ch. 2000-318. Note.--Former s. 381.703. Welcome. Session. Committees . Legislators . Information Center. Statutes anq Constitution . Lobbvist Information Disclaimer: The information on this system is unverified. The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers should be consulted for official purposes. Copyright © 2000-2001 State of Florida. Contact us. Prlvacv Statement http://www.Jeø.state.f1.uslStatutesl...ISEC033.HTM&:Tit1e=->2oo1..>Ch0408->Sectiono/02oo3 117/2002 "'" ucbJlfED JAN 1 4 2002 January 9,2002 Barbara H. Jacobowitz, M.S. Executive Director Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc. 4152 W. Blue Heron Blvd. Suite 229 Riviera Beach, FL .33404 Dear Ms. Jacobowitz: As a follow-up to our earlier conversation concerning possible board membership, I have enclosed my resume along with an information packet on Hibiscus Children's Center. Please let me know if you require additional information to assist you in determining how my involvement can assist in meeting the current and future needs of your organization. I am honored to have been nominated by Lillian Tamayo. Over the last several years, I have had the privilege to collaborate with Lillian on a variety of issues. Most notably in establishing a legislative agenda for the Treasure Coast as part of the Treasure Coast Coordination Coalition, participation in the Mental Health Workgroup of the Alliance of Okeechobee and the Treasure Coast, and numerous discussions associated with the nuances of Continuous Quality Improvement. Thank you for sending me your most recent annual report. I look forward to determining how we can work together in support of the Treasure Coast Health Council's mission. Sincerely, __.----1 ~. Lawrence B. Brooks, MA, M.S. £b-. \r ..."" Lawrence Bowen Brooks 398 SE Crosspoint Drive Port S1. Lucie, FL 34983 (561) 343-9901 - H (561)334-9311 - W QUALIFICATIONS · Nine years of senior management experience · Masters degrees in both management and psychology · Extensive experience in program planning & evaluation · Fiscal responsibility for multi-million dollar budgets · Facilitator of numerous trainings · Experience with residential, in-home, and conununity settings · Experience with child, adolescent and adult populations WORK mSTORY 2000 - Present HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER Chief Projects Officer Duties include: · Secure and Supervise Foster Care Contract · Develop, Implement, and Maintain Continuous Quality Improvement Plan · Secure MEDICAID Number for In-house Clinical Services · Locate and Establish Group Home in Surrounding Counties · Coordination of$5 Million Capital Campaign in Indian River County 1997 - 2000 CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY Executive Director 4/00 - 8/00 Interim Executive Director 1/00 - 4/00 Duties include: · Oversight of Programs · Contract Negotiations · Board Recruitment & Development · Fund Raising & Grant Writing · Fiscal Management · Conununity Relations & Leadership '-" .".¡ Program Director 8/99 - 1/00 Duties included: · Developing and implementing policies and procedures · Hiring, recruiting, and training staff · Promoting community awareness of services offered · Expanding services offered through fund raising and grant opportunities · Ensuring that expenditures remain within budgetary guidelines · Supervision of all Case Management and Development Programs · Establishing system to ensure compliance with Medicaid billing Proghilll Supervisor n 5/99 - 8/99 Non-Residential CINS-FINS Duties included: · Developing and implementing policies and procedures · Hiring, recruiting, and training staff · Promoting community awareness of services offered · Expanding services offered through fund raising and grant opportunities · Ensuring that expenditures remain within budgetary guidelines · Establishment and Chairing of Case Staffing Committees in 4 counties Director of Residential Services 11/97 - 5/99 CINSIFINS Duties included: · Developing and implementing policies and procedures · Hiring, recruiting, and training staff · Promoting community awareness of services offered · Expanding services offered through fund raising and grant opportunities · Ensuring that expenditures remain within budgetary guidelines · Supervising the clinical and day-to-day operation of shelter services 1997 CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Project/Treatment Director Level 6 Commitment Program Duties included: · Supervising 42 staff · ClilÚcal supervision of 50 clients in a residential program and 50 community based adolescent clients · Ensuring quality assurance standards, contract compliance and maintaining policies and procedures outlined by corporate and state 1992-1997 I994-1996 '-' ...., entities · Maintaining budgetary accountability for a multi-mìllion dollar contract yourn SERVICES INTERNATIONAL Director of Clinical Services 6/96 - 5/97 Duties included: · Clinical supervision of 42 staff · Developing and monitoring a $2.5 million annual budget · Evaluating referrals · Establishing program guidelines and policies · Conununity relations · Developing annual business plan Family Therapist/ Aftercare Coordinator/ Conununity-Based Offender Specific Treatment (C.O.S.T.) Program Coordinator 7/94 - 6/96 Duties included: · Developing, marketing, and implementing the C.O.S.T. Program · Supervising C.O.S.T. personnel · Post-discharge monitoring of clients · Family Therapy Group Leader 8/92 - 7/94 Duties included: · Facilitating group and individual counseling · Supervising residential staff · Developing and implementing quality assurance · Participating in the management decision-making process CARSON-NEWMAN COLLEGE Adjunct Faculty Member Departments of Psychology and Conununication Arts Duties Included: · Developing curriculum and syllabi · Evaluating student knowledge · Creating a positive learning environment · Providing opportunities for experiential learning '- .. AGENDA REQUEST ~ ITEM NO. C-4b DATE: February 5, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMIlTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: Budget Amendment No. 02-119 and Equipment Request No. EQ02-192 / Media Equipment BACKGROUND: See attachments FUNDS AVAILABLE: Machinery & Equipment 001-1210-564000-100 PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Budget Amendment No. 02-119 and Equipment Request No. EQ02-192 for the purchase of a non-linear editing workstation (CPU) for the purpose of editing video/audio footage from The Computer Station in the amount of $3,990 to be used by the Media Specialist for producing video productions. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) ~~~ .I Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Aoorovals County Attorney' Management & Budget Purchasing: originating Dept. Other, Other, Finance: (Check for Copy o~ly, if applicable) Eft. 5/96 '-'" ..." INTERNAL REQUISITION AUTHORIZATION For Warehouse Orders and Other Quotations DEPARTMENT: Administration FUND: 001-1210-564000-1000 DATA INPUT PAGE CLERK 1 REQUISITION NUMBER REQUISITION 1/23/02 DATE DELIVER TO: REMARKS: #1 VENDORS: # 18990 NUMBER NAME . The Computer Station ADDRESS .1706 NW Federal Hwy, Stuart, FL. 34994 561-692-4700 SOLE SOURCE #2 NUMBER NAME B & H Video Supply ADDRESS 4209'" Ave., NY, NY. 10001 1-800-606-6969 EMERGENCY PURCHASE #3 NUMBER NAME Howard Computers ADDRESS NJA ITEM QUANTITY UM DESCRIPTION NO VENDOR #3 UNIT PRICE VENDOR #2 UNIT PRICE VENDOR #1 UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRIC Specially designed CPU unit with Pro One Capture Card and software for the purposes of editing. Unit comes with keyboi.rd. mouse, speakers and two 19- monîtors. NfA S 4778.55 $ 3990.00 PRICES ESTABLISHED BY: VENDOR #3 N/A TOTALS #2 $ 4na.55 #1 $ 3990.00 $ 3990.00 d=J, L&A .-/ VENDOR REPRESENTATIVE ~ RÉ ING PERSOO #2 '-" ....., ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM TO: Doug Anderson, County Administrator FROM: Shane DeWitt, Media Specialist SUBJECT: Background for Equipment Request EQ02-192 DATE: January 29,2002 The attached request is for a non-linear editing workstation. It \\ill give me the ability to take video/audio footage from almost any tape format, weather it is analog or digital, and transfer it to the computer workstation to be edited. Once the footage had been transferred and given a project name I can then add graphics, titles, effects, music beds and re-arrange the footage in almost anyway to prepare the selected project for broadcast. After this process it can then be transferred to a specified tape format. All of this can be done without losing any picture quality. In order to do this a special computer must be purchased to store the enormous amounts of video/audio footage that will put transferred to this workstation on a weekly basis. The workstation comes complete with a CPU unit, video card, dual 19" monitors, keyboard, mouse, software and four 80 gigabyte drives that will be adequate for storing the necessary video/audio footage. I have checked \\ith three vendors for the attached equipment. The Computer Station was the lowest bidder. The price for the workstation from The Computer Station was $788.55 less than the next highest vendor (all documentation is attached). The Computer Station, a local vendor, can also service the workstation if needed. I am recommending that the Board approve the purchase ofthe non-linear editing workstation from The Computer Station for S 3990.00 r I.JQ"\ v?" BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PREPARED DATE: AGENDA DATE: OMB FOR ADMINISTRATION 01/29/02 02105/02 TO: 001-1210-564000-100 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $3,990 FROM: 001-1210-551501-100 OFFICE SUPPLIES-COMPUTER $2,500 001-1210-552000-100 OPERATING SUPPLIES $1,490 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Allocate funds for Administration-Media S ecialist CONTINGENCY BALANCE: N/A THIS AMENDMENT: NfA REMAINING BALANCE: N/A DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-119 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: G:\BUDGEnQUA TTRO\GENERAL\FORMSIAMENDM02.wb3 m o c =ë :s: m z -l ;:0 m o ;I!: rn £) <:::> I\) , ..... (0 I\) oco(J; t::3;J~;! 0..... ;;:¡: Õ 2. Ql co S è) ~ .... .... t;j. 9-: t;j. co éiì s: t;j. 2 ~ Ql <a .....Q)co~::JaCr.l.Q ~::J "Os~-g~ coQ.O'coco.....C)C/) C) ...... 0 C) ::J Ql -. ...... _. ::J- ~ Õj' ~ ~ 7;::' ::!'! CO"" 0' 0 -. ~, CO::JCQ~CO::JC/)..... Q. Q. CD Q. t:: _. ; a ......o~coC/)CI)-..Ql ~. Ql -<: ;::;: C/) co co ...... C) "0 :§ ::!" _. Q. CI) ......Q co_ co Cl)Q.t:: ~ 0 s: ::J Õ co :3 ::::.¡. o tu co co ~ S· co ª Q. tu ;: ~. tiï t;j. tu tuS:Q.O 0 -.....::J :-0) 9:t::::J è)'Q1 0 ::JC!':~.......~~:::J (J; O-::rcoO I (ii':J~coQ.::J§' ~2-Q.G)~O'CO ~ a::J..... tu s: ~ :So <:; co .... ..... co-Q.COQl::rco ~~~3::Jco9-: ::J' m Òì':3 Q. -g g: ~::Jt::coS::;';:¡co P..Q.::JCOU co ~o -...... ~, a ~ Q. ..... 0 '" C/) 0 "0 ,..-- :;. Þ g: co * a~ogcoo~ o..O):3coO'-"m ,...."0 CI)_CO..... .... :::r m Ci) d Q. -. C) _. ~, _. 0 ......C)<:;C)Q."'::!:::J Õ ~(J; õ.:::r :J C)co§2coo tJ ~ 0 ::J ~ :So lJ <:: ~ 2 ~.Q f6-S O'co:3 t::Om ª3co;!~Òì'~ tu t:: ~ t;j. 0 t:: -. .......=:;:-0) .....Q.CO CI) ij' co Sti ~ õ· ~ "" ëõ 9: 0 0' 0.. :c...........c:g.o..... CI)':-<::tu C)Qìo ~ "ö::J .....co:::: -00:::::: ~ Q. õ· co <'5 -... ::J . ......0 CI) CI)-" :I> C") C") o c Z -l Z C :s: 1II m ?:J <:::> <:::> ..... I ..... I\) ..... <:::> I 01 Ol ~ <:::> <:::> <:::> I ..... <:::> <:::> c.... ',~'C:C C "~c en ~ 0 ::! ~ Ci) ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ Õ ~f 0 z ~~ ',¡: ::l ;r¡~ ~~~ w ;;'(0 ~~ -;.~ :fi ti. ':} .~ ,,-0:. :~ :r:; '.;'; ;:; c- o.... .:.;., .~ -.;- ~, ~. 't1 -:.'7' ;;: -?; -:.-¡ I ~ ii ~ ~ 'õ", ~ -.; ~ ~ t!¡ ~::o :~ Iì1 ~< 1ltêi) rn ",,,0 .. ~ ~ ~ 1~ ¡ o m "tl :I> ;:0 -l :s: m z :-:I )0> o s: ~ ëi) ~ )0> ::i o <: ;:0 m C") o :s: :s: m z o m o en -i m~ :þg~ G1-cm !;£~(") omo :Þ~c ;;O;;oz mm-i 00-< CcCJ mmO enen:Þ -i-i::O 0,,0 :Þ00 -i;;o." m ""(") °enO ~(")C °:ÞZ ~r-i ~-<-< om(") N:þO ;;o~ N~ o oen ~en I _ NO gz Nm ::0 en ~ C/) JH~j-23-2L302 ~ 39 '7"HE CO~IFUTER STATIGrj 5E~2 3550 P.Ol/Dl THE COMPUTER STATION 1706 N. W. FEDERAL HWY STUART, FL 34994 PHONE; 561-692-4700 FAX: 561-692-3550 FAX TRANSMJSSrON COVER SHEET FAX- 11. F' H~nM' ~~~r¿~8&1 tt C-{ ¿, "2- 2-f 3 ( ~~~F' EAr.¡::,· NOTES IF YOU DO NOT RECENE AlL THE PAGES. PLEASE CALL 561-692-4700 JH~<-23-202,2 ~: 39 THE COl1PUTER STHTIC~l 5~92 3550 P.02/C? 1706 N.W. Fed'lr:¡1 Hwl,l. . Stuart, Flcrida 3'~4 The. COMPU~EA STATIO company .~ (561) 692-4700 FfiX (5¢ 1) 6W·35S::I QUOTE TOWER CASE f'''.rTEL D845 SYSTEM BOARD TI\T"ŒL 1.6 GIG P4 CPU 512 MEGS RAM PC-l33 30 GIG HD 1.44 MEG FLOPPY 4, 80 GIG nOORPM HARD DRIVES FAST TRt\CK IDE RAID CARD PIh1NACLE PRO ONE CAPTURE CARD SB LIVE SOUND CARD INTEL NETWORK CARD CDRWDRlVE !-rVIDIA GEFORCE DUAL HEADVIDEO CARD KEYBOARD MOUSE WNDOWS 2000 PRO 2,19" SHORT NECK MONlTORS $3990,00 lJPGRADE CDRW TO DVD-RW $400.00 wwu! .compute1õWtlon.cC'<Tl TO-:-AL P.fJ2 'an 22 . 02 - 01:"-'" 20 PH 212- 239-77 ....."J B&H Photo-Video Inc. ".'1,1,; I" ,I,'I"Y ":';'!' '·j"",..:.'·,I":,,, .;.,"r-II, "I . -Ii ; I :. 11 I¡!" l ',",.; Ii·. ';' \ , ;: 1'! , ',!l _; ii, ! II ~ If! FAX MESSAGE FROM: PHOTO· VIDEO· PRO AUDIO 420 Ninth Avenue - New York, NY 10001 Phone: 212 239-7500 - Fax: 212 239-7770 http://www.bhphotovideo.com Date: 01/22/2002 Pages Following: 2 Attention: Bob Rosart Saint Lucie County Fax No: 1-561-462-1443 If you did not receive all pages of this tnmsmission, pleue contact the Fax Department at extension 2370. Contents prop.ny at B&H Photo- VId/KJ, Inc. ilnd ITli1Y not b. d~ulblJt.d or rsproduced without p.rm13slon j',f il'. ';'¡,.;¡';'-,HL'¡¡'¡l;,;:';"¡";"·'¡ page 1 ! i I , , I i I I I I I ! I i , , i , I I i i í I ! I î 'an 22 '02 - O~: 20 PH B&H Photo-Video Inc. 212-239-7"" Page 2 IÞH PRO AUDIO I- ORDER INQUIRY 212-444-50701 212-239-7765 Tel.' 800.616.2999 'I Tel: 800.221-5743 212-444.5001 ,i\ 212-239-7549 Føx: 800-947-90031 Føx: 800.947-2215 "i""'·'··'· ../' /.../..}, ,,>, . 6nTÞ'lW8~,~W~W . bryp~()~video.con1 ~ ~ . E i i - PHOTO -; VIDEO III IMAGING 212-444-e600 II 212-444-5000 Tel: 800-947-9950 ¡ Tel.' 800.947.9910 212-239-7770 I 212-444·5001 Fax: 800-947-7008 ! Fu: 800-947-9003 >.. ......., '. .'(""" ........",,1.,.,. i." ..(Y·.· , 42Çl,N!l)th,~i{~I)~~, NllWYOfk,Ny'~ºþô 1 The Profesrio1Ull's Source Quote No.: 73474720 Sold To: Bob Rœart Samt Luck County 1 FORT PIERCE, FL 34~2 Ship To: Saint Lucie County 1 FORT PIERCE FL 34982 Bill Phone: (561)462-1761 Fa.~ Phone: (561)462-1443 (561)462-1761 CONllns OF: I all SOUNDDLAST~R PCI·128 DASIC SOUND CARO/IœCl CRS81e , PINNACLE IMPRES810N DVD f!PRO ON~IOO' /2CIOOtT3K/fIEQ PlIDVDU 2'0'00130 1 011 350 WATT ATX FULLTOWER OASEiFlEG AMFUL TOWATX1 S880A all ATI RADEON DUAL DISPLAY (32blll OEM/REG aBRADe 1 TURNKEY SYSTEM INSTALLATION & CONFIClUIlATIONIREG TURNKEY 1 1rfl"B. PENTIUM 4 1.7GHZ PROCESSOR/IlEG INP417 2 011 2BIIMIl R1MM MODUL~ IIIDRAMl/RI!Cl Oll2aðM811DRAM , 011 ASUS P4T MOTHERBOAIID (SINGLE PROCl/REG GIIASP4T P4T 1 PINNACLE PRO ONE 3D EomNO BOARDiREQ PlPONE 210100109 IBM IDE 7200 RPM HARD DRIVE 40GB (ATAll001lR!Q IBIDEHD40 07NEl!lB4 CUS1l:lmor COpy - Page 1 01 2 'an 22 . 02 - O~: 20 PH BIlcH Photo-VIdeo Inc. 212-23!J-l~ Page 3 IÞH PHOTO...... VIDEO 8< IMAGING ¡. Tel: ~~~::;~:~ I Tel: ~6~~:~~~g ( 212-239-7770 I' 212-444-5001 . Fax: 800-947-7008 . Fax: 800-947-9003 .4~Q¡~¡~thÂV~~~¡j~N~wY ark, NY. 1þPQ 1: - ¡ORDER INQUIRY ¡ Tel: 212-239-7765 I . 800-221-5743 I 212-239-7549 I Fax: 800-947-2215 ¡:',ôh:.¡.ftJW~þgwWW\Þbpllbtovld~Ó. ¢ç¡,t Quote No.: 73474720 The Profes5'ional's SOUTce , IBM IDE 7200 RPM HARD DRIVE 75GB (ATAll00IlREG lBIDElID7$ 07N31135/4777 , GB CD-RW REWRITABlE (20xl0x40X IDE t-ITJREG GBCRWI COW624E , GB 3.5" FLOPPY DISK DRIVElREG GBFD35 FD23SHFB:l91 1 MICROSOFT MICROSOFT WHEEL MOUSE/REG MITBM 306090 1 GB COMPUTER KEYBOARD f/PCIREG GBFOKB KTSOOP82USC 1 MICROSOFT WINDOWS 2000 PROFESSIONAL (OEMJIREG l\offi''DiJllOO 82302438 IBM IDE 7200 RPM HAIlD DRIVE 76<l1l {ATAll00l/REG IBlDElID7$ :nU5 274.95 07N393S/4777 PROMlse·TECH. FAST TRACK 100 IDe CONTflOLUR CAIlDIIœt3 PRIT100 119.95 129.95 FASTTRAK 100 2 MITBUBISHI DIAMOND PRO 1120U 'll" lBOOX'200 lo!OOITORiREG MIDPR0920 G 399.95 799.90 DP9:l0 3 , all 258MB RIMM MODULE (RORAMlIREO GBJ56MBRDRk"d 1'!9.95 539.85 SUb-Total: 4,644.60 Shlppln¡: 133.95 Total: 4,77835 CUl1Dme. Copy Page 2 01 2 '-"" ....", From: To: Date: Subject: Ruth DeStafney "kturner@howardcomputers.com".GWIA.SLCMAILD 1/161021:22PM Re: ST LUCIE COUNTY PROF DV500 TURNKEY SOLUTION QUOTE Hi Kelly, Thank you so much for trying to meet our request. We sort of thought this type of system would be hard to match. But being Government we must attempt to get more than one quote on large items before we can purchase an item from a "sole source" . By giving us your reasons, was really a great help. We will of course still give Howard equal opportunity to bid whenever we can! Thanks again, Ruthie >>> Kelly Turner <kturner@howardcompo1ers.com> 1/16/02 12:54:24 PM »> Ruthie - Recently you faxed me a quotation from B & H, and requested a comparison quotation from Howard Computers. Our engineering department has decided to offer a No Bid for this request. We are currently not able to offer the components or substitution parts as required for this quote. We have not tested thoroughly these parts ~equired on our systems. We are hoping to be able to quote this kind of system in the near future, but presently we will not be able to meet your required specifications. I hope that you keep us in mind for all future quote requests. Sincerely - Kelly Turner Howard Computers Inside Sales Representative cc: Robert Rosart ....0# ..., , . t-.);t...JN ~I-:¡-+~ . I I I ...., WW w wi!\,) t-..)'N N '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ... <.0 eo ,""-I a. C1I ~ ...., ",U:ÞI ~ ....,'" ~ 0 W Q:)''''''¡ C1 "'~...., '" ~ o <D 0:>""-1 a. C1I,~ W N ... 10 I I i I I . I I I -l I , 'll; s: ! 0 i I Cl Q i r+ I !:!. I 0 a. I ... ãi' OJ , I ... g' S::' N :Þ ~ ... , <? Q (tl ¡ i n ... ~ r+ ! 0 :Þ I 0 ü, 3 ! 0 I r+ 0 , s:: , 011 1(]11 :Þ ::J tn; C1I 01 01 01 <-~ C1I 01 C1I r+ en ~I C1I 01 01 01 <-~ 1....1 ~ ~ ~ n ....i ~ .... N ... ... I en: ~ 0 n 0: ~I 0 Cl C1I N ,oi ... 0 0 0 OJ 0' 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 Cl s:: OJ 01 0 0 0 ... 0 18 0 0 0 ::J . I r+ i Jfl OJ 0 ~ 0 m Iml ~ -l -0 :Þ i- 0 <: ~ g', :0 ñl .... n 0 (J) is. <: 0 n m 0 < iD '" (II .... ~': ~r (II ~ (1) ;0 æ. 0 l1'> § 3 (II s:: 19.'¡ l1'> ,g' CIl (II ::J s: § 0, (1) õ' CIl :;jl '::J a ~ ~ CIl m -' I~ :J m s:: 3 (fJ '2. ^! is: :u ~ 3 0- ~ ii, IOJ (II 0- ~ m CIl ::ï 0 (J) '" -oJ S' :J m n f6' ~ .... U'1. ~ < OJ (II õ, 0 S' .... ::T 0 3 :u õ' !:f (JI 0 :J õ' ~ , OJ (1) m ro :J (J :J (II a. L:l (J 0 ¡¡;. <: (1) g it , .... ¡ õ' :J . , I :Þ 3 ... 1U'1 0 0 C1I (.ù N W W s:: 0 o. N ... 0 Cl W co (Xl ()' (Xl :J 0 0· 18 0 0 0 Cl Cl 0 Cl Cl Cl ~ 0 0 0 0 0 Cl Cl 0 Cl Cl Cl ~IO' , ë;t OJ OJ -l m o < i .... c: ~. ~ !i:'- El' 0 (JI OJ _CIl - a. S' 0 to .. < 0, m a. ::J , 0 :Þ I III (JI a. (JJ !i (JI <: ;:;: < ,g' () a. s:: ëi : OJ õ' a m () a. ~ (J m 0 : OJ (J C/1 10 0- it , i'Ð ,m I 3 I~ -- , 0 , I Q) I C/1 I (1) . . , -0 ; i Þ , I i ;l!: I I -n , i , I I ¡ I i I ì :Þ ; 3 ... ¡ ~I... N , 0 G') co I s:: .þ.i-Þ- ~ ... co i j ::J ""-1'''"-1 ~ ~ ... :...,¡ ~ "ll.....¡ <D '" C1I , .. , I :Þ ., , 0 , 3 .... , ~ I 0 , s:: ¡ I :l r+ '" Î ;tI J Q ::I: , I 3 ..... i Dl ..... ~ :¡. .þ. '" C1I '" ~ W NI ~. II) !-"¡ CD 0 0' Cll Cll tn C> (., en CQ 0 0' 0 0 0 0 c..>, ..... C1I 0 0' 10 0 0 0 , ! I ¡ I I I I - I I I ( r ( ( , u [ 1- '-' AGENDA REQUEST -wi ITEM NO. c-5 . DATE: Feb. 5, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Paul Julin Project Manager,Central Services SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Central Services SUBJECT: Roof replacement for "Data Treatment Center" & "Sloan Property" BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County owns both the Data Treatment Center (drug addiction) located at 4590 Selvitz Road and the Sloan Property (pregnant mothers) located at 119 N. 10th Street. Currently the Sloan Property pays St. Lucie County $500.00 a month for rental fees, however rental fees are not collected on the Data Treatment Center. Both buildings need new roofs. The Sloan Property roof replacement will cost $5,750.00. The Data Treatment Center will cost $19,750.00. In addition to the roofing needs the Data Treatment Center has a leaking wall. Staff will also stucco these walls at a cost of $3,800.00. Staff had budgeted $35,000.00 for a gate at the Sheriffs Compound, these funds were not used for this, (see explanation attached). Staff would like to transfer these funds, $35,000.00, to use for the re-roofing and stucco. Usually this type of work will uncover needed repairs not included in the proposals. Because of this, staff is asking for the full $35,000.00. FUNDS AVAIL: 316-1931-599300-100 (Central Services Maintenance Projects) PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the reallocation of funds budgeted for the Sheriffs Gate to be used for roof replacement and stucco work for the Data Treatment Center and the Sloan Property in the amount of $35,000.00 Originating Dept. CONCURRENCE: rf2-r ---- Doug Anderson County Administrator MISSION ACTION: ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) County Attorney: Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: 2fl1J Inff¥lû] Other: Purchasing Mgr.: '.J~ Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eft. 1/97 H:\Agenda-Sata&Sl~a~ ~oof.~~ ~ ....., :.;,. ;.;. ~~ :;¡ ;.;. " :::: :.¡. " ;::: :.;- .;-: ¡¡ ~~ :;~ :::: :;:: ~~l ~ ;?;: .;.; :;~ DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL SERVICES ME1\'I 0 RAN DUM ~~:~:~:~;;:~:::';:::'::::8::::::::;:~;:::~::::~::;:~;:;:-::;t~~~~~::::;:::;::::~:::%:8:::::~:::::;::;::::::::::::::;::::;: TO: Board of county Commissioners FROM: paul Julin, project Manager THROUGH: Roger Shinn, Director central Services DATE: January 17, 2002 SUBJECT: Roof replacement for "Data Treatment Center" & "Sloan property" ******************************************************************* BACKGROUND: St. Lucie county owns both the Data Treatment Center (drug addiction) located at 4590 Selvitz Road and the Sloan Property (pregnant mothers) located at 119 N. 10th Street. Both buildings need new roofs. The Sloan property roof replacement will cost $5,750.00. The Data Treatment Center will cost $19,750.00. In addition to the roofing needs the Data Treatment Center has a leaking wall. Staff will also stucco these walls at a cost of $3,800.00. Staff had budgeted 535,000.00 for a gate at the Sheriffs Compound, these funds were not used for this, (see explanation attached). staff would like to transfer these funds, 535,000.00, to use for the re-roofing and stucco. Usually this type of work will uncover needed repairs not included in the proposals. Because of this, staff is asking for the full 535,000.00. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of county Commissioners approve the reallocation of funds budgeted for the Sheriffs Gate to be used for roof replacement and stucco work for the Data Treatment Center and the Sloan Property in the amount of 535,000.00. '-' ....I DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Roger Shinn Director, Central Services SUBJECT: Sheriff's Admin Bldg - Renovation of Gate System Project DATE: January 31, 2002 Staff had called a vendor for a gate controller that would work with the current gate system and they said they no longer make such system. In the process of calling other vendors - staff found a vendor who had such a gate control system which works with the gates at the Sheriff's compound. Staff had decided to go ahead and fund this project in last fiscal year's budget. Therefore, funds of $35,000 in the current fiscal year capital plan are available for other projects. erd '-" .....I Exclamation for reallocation of funds Central Services had requested for the 200 1/2002 budget to replace the gates at the Sheriffs Administration at Midway Road. The Gate company recommended for this replacement was Complete Access Control, Inc. They suggested we install a different type operator which would require new gates. We ask for a cost for that work to use for our budget request. The cost was $31,721.00. Because of the difficulty of maintaining the gates at the Sheriffs compound the gates were being left open which created a security problem at the compound. The Sheriff ask if there was anything we could do to secure the compound, they recommended a company that they thought could fix the old gate system. After talking to the gate company we found that the gate operators were not repairable but there were other operators that would work well with the gate system we have. We were able to have the gate operators replaced in Sept 2001 last years budget for the cost of $11,500.00. We would request thatthe money budgeted for the Sheriffs gate be reallocated to make the repairs at the DATA House. __.. ... .....,t- J.u.'.:Jd ~M 'MTLU~ ~UUrlNu 561 468 8397 p.1 '-' ..I J. A. Taylor Roofing, Inc. PROPOSAL IDATE 101/1412002 I Billing Address: I I Project Address: Saint Lucie County Data Treatment Center Central Service 4590 Selvitz Rd. Jerry Flynn Fort Pierce Fla. 3071 Oleander Fla. 34982 J. A. Taylor Roofing. Inc hereby proposeSlM following: I PH: 1561-462-1430 I Fx: 1561-462-1444 Flat Roof 1. Remove existing roof system 2. Inspect deck for bad wood 3. Install base sheet over existing decking 4. Install modified bitumen roof system over base sheet 5. Install new flashings as needed Pitch Roof Section 6. Install #30 pound felt over existing decking. 7. Install 1 n standing seam metal roof system 8. Standard color to be chosen 9. All roof related debris removed by roofing contractor Terms of Payment For tbe sum of:$ Standard 19,750.00 Any I1ttraion or dcvi&iOD ticm 1Jte abow: s~cificaiœs irwotving addilialal c:Qsts.. win be c:uçuted.œ1,. upon wr1lt1en orden. and wiD b«ome m t'C1" char¡p: over IlIDd .above \he esDrnlle. All damaged wood wtß will be lrilJed. 20'... avct time ."d ms:tcrials. Nd n::spoasiblc ror drivçYf&'1 c:taclcs or acoeu &t1:æ needed tI:J .pproach project. Any diem 11>31 i. iD dor.ult in tile )ayalellt ofrcoocydue IlIldo,..rmsof1l>i. cart,,,l will... tÞarø<d. tho r.ae crt 112%p<rmtrolh 0Il1lle ""I'ud ball1loe (MaxImum 1110..-.1>1. by ',"'l trlmY client is ~rC'rn:::d tu an trtOllX)' fOr coDCcbOl'\o clienl Ig:reeS top.¡y.all Ml incum:d in the c:oIlcd.irm of\hc amount due. plus. III ~owt coslsGIld øome)'l fèes.. Worlc wi! bo scMduled upcn wrinca ac:ccpasnø: OrtNs proposlJ. This proposal ma,. be withdnlwn &vm '-G iCnot ae"pr.cd WlÎttån 60 days Acceptance of Proposal The above prices, specifications. and cooditions are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified: Owners Signature: Date: Contractors Signature: Date: 302 Melton Drive. Fort Pierce, FL 34982. (561) 461-7848 · FAX (561) 468-8397 .............,...... .LO')'~V.L ~o! qoö-öj~1 04/09/2001 04:09:08 PM P.I '-' ..J J. A. Taylor Roofing, IDe Proposal I Date: /4/9/2001 ¡J. A. Taylor Roofing, Inc hereby proposes the following: ----¡ , , I I I I I roject Address. 119 North 10th Street Fort Pierce Fla. sG.~ Billing Address: ! Saint Lucie County i C~tral Service Jerry FI)'nn ¡3071 Oleander Ave. i Fort Pierce Fla. 34982 I ; Fx: I 462-1444 Remove existing roof system On flat section install base sheet over existing plywood Install one layer of modified bitumen roof system On pitch part Remove ~xisting roof system Install #30 pound felt over existing decking Install 25 year fiberglass roof system All roof related debris removed by roofing contractor Note: 350.00 of wood work included in price TERMS OF PAYMENT Standard I I IFor the Súm of: $ ¡_ i 1,,750.00 I ~ , Any alreration or deviation fromlhe abo\'e specifications involving additional C05ts. will be executed only upon "ritten orders, and will become an eJ.1ra ! ; charge ·)ver and above the estimate. All damaged wood wort will be billed on at 2œ... over time and materials.Not respolL!!ible for driveway cracks or accm ¡ ., ¡Uta; noeded [0 approach project. Any client that is in default in the pa)Tllent of money due under tenns of Uùs contract will be charge allhe rate of 1 112°'. ¡ I p~ month on the unpaid balance \},!a'<imum allowable by law). If any client is referred to an attorney for collection. client agrees to pay all fees iocurr.d in : the col!ection of the amount due, plus all court costs and attorneys fees. Wort "ill be scheduled upon written acceptance of this proposal. This proposal may.., b( "ithdra\\n from us if /lot accepted with 60 days. : ACCEPT fu"lCE OF PROPOS..>J. The above prices. specifications. and conditions are hereby accepted. You are authorized 10 do the wort as specified. ÛIln~rs Si~ature: Dale:_ Contractors Signalllre: Date: 302 Melton Drin e Fort Pierce, FL 34982 e(561) 461-7848 e (561) 466-4040 eF~'X (561) 468-8397 ("";.HY I.;¡ Wt.~lN(j PAGE Ell ; . '. l' ,. I ....; I II ,Ii - ¡ I " ...1 ;! -,i .:! '.I:: .' :.- ;~. . ,: ~~7;}:·::··<;. ""j' W~~'/;.::::/:··: .,' \';~~'::~ ......;-.\..::' :. .~- . ~.: '\'.:'-!j', ;. .' . . . ;~. ~.'i't;i;~~) ,... '-"' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM~, C-6 DATE: February 5,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Director, Parks & Recreation SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Amphitheater electrical upgrade and approval of Budget Amendment # 02120 BACKGROUND: Last year in response to several complaints about the electrical system at the Amphitheater, staff was scheduled to upgrade the system to adequately accommodate sound and lights during special events. In anticipation of transferring the Amphitheater back to the City of Ft. Pierce in exchange for County funding of the Sunrise Theater, these improvements were put on hold. Staff is once again receiving complaints. Staff has determined that it will cost approximately six thousand dollars ($6,000) to complete the needed upgrade (cost breakdown attached). Due to the delay in transferring the Amphitheater to the City, staff is requesting that the Board of County Commissioners approve the use of six thousand ($6,000) out of Contingency to complete the upgrades. FUNDS AVAILABLE IN: 001-9910-599100-800 (GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY) PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff to proceed with electrical upgrade at the Amphitheater, approve the use of $6,000 out of Contingency and approve Budget Amendment # 02120 COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) r;?~~ Doug Anderson County Administrator Originating Dept: Coordination/Siqnatures Mgt. & Budget: r-1 /ltJm(,? Other: Purchasing Mgr.: County Attorney: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eft. 1/97 H:\WP\Amphìthater upgrade agenda.wpd ~ BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PREPARED DATE: AGENDA DATE: OMB FOR PARKS AND RECREATION 01/29/02 02/05/02 TO: 001-7210-546100-700 FROM: 001-9910-599100-800 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONTINGENCY $6 000 $6,000 Allocatin funds into Parks and Recreation for electrical s stem '7 02-120 G:\BU DG ET\QUA TTRO\G EN ERAL \F ORMS\AMEN DM02. wb3 .. , DEPARTMENT Approved Budget Proposed action: "" FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 FUNDS APPROVED FROM CONTINGENCY GENERAL FUND AMOUNT REMAINING: $841,417 ITEM ACCOUNT # Contingency 001-9910-599100-800 Reserved for Supervisor of Elections Supervisor of Elect. Loan Payoff to Suntrust Bank Tourism Recovery Plan in Partnership with FLAUSA AS400 Public Safety Software Upgrade Reimbursement of expenses for the AMISTAD Sailing Ship Risk Management/Safety Equipment Request #02-177 Defibrillators Total used: Balance Available Electrical system upgrade at the Ft Pierce Amphitheater Balance Available After Proposed Action: G:\BUDGET\QUA TTRO\GENERAL \F ORMS\AM ENDM02.wb3 ....; AMOUNT DATE 1,107,452 $107,452 10/01 $5,648 1 0/09 $109,931 11/20 $18.000 12/18 9,554 01/22 9,450 01/22 260,035 847,417 6,000 02/05/02 841,417 " ¡ '-" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ....I PARKS & RECREATION MEMORANDUM To: From: Through: Date: Subject: Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator Linda Brown, Admin~ajive Manager tf7 Pete Keogh, Director r I( . January 23, 2002 Amphitheater Electrical Attached is the cost breakdown of materials to upgrade the electrical system at the Amphitheater. In effect, the upgrades proposed will increase level of service from the transformer to 400 amps which will provide adequate power for lighting and sound, prevent overloading of the circuits which has caused blow-outs in the past and eliminate the need to use generators to supplement inadequate power levels. The attached breakdown totaling $4,207.95 covers wiring, conduit, breaker box, 400 amp meter can, panel board and misc. hardware. Once the upgrades are begun, we can then determine what we will need as far as a junction box and panel box. This is estimated at $1500.00. Estimated total of project is $5,707.95. It will take approximately four (4) weeks to receive the materials needed to complete this job. JOHN o. ORUHN Drsrricr No 1 . DOUG COWARD. Disrricr No 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS. Disrricr No. J . mANNIE HUTCHINSON O·srrrer No 4 . CLIFF OARNES. Orsrner No.5 (ounry Adminisrroro( - Douglas M_ Arderson 2JOO Virginia Avenue · Phone (561) 462-1515 · TDD (561) 462-1428 011 ZZ"/OZ i 09: 37 AH EST HSI - FT. PIERCE ELE '-' Page 2 -~ 2 '714740 -..I il ~~~ em! 0: 401 ANGLE RD. FORT PIERCE. FL 34947 Telephone 561-464-2500 P.O. BOX 105837 ATLANTA. GA 30346-5837 FT. PIERCE ELEC/BLOG MAT/PLBG Q.loted To: BO. OF COUNTY COfoI'>1. ST. LUCI E COUNTY 2300 VIRGINIA AVE. FORT PI EReE. FL 34962 PRICE QUO TAT ION Ship To: BO. OF COl}lTY CO+l. *'*60 OF CTV ca1'1 SLC ELECTRICAL ACCT/2300 VIRGINIA AVE 1FT PIERCE FL 34962 Bid Date Quotation Notes 80397 01/22/02 AMP. THEATER Exp Da te 02/17/02 IIh Slsm 11 VAH Writer eER Pg 1 Ln Quant Our EDP Code Loe Oeseri pti on Net Price L\n Extension 1 REVISED QUOTE' ! ! II ! !! "! ! 2 1 B80397*9268662 NS DG325NRK 400/3 N3 SW. 640.38 EA 640.38 3 3 STR400R 12 TR400R SHA'MIT 28.09 EA 84.27 4 1 L98178628 16 9817-8528 K-7T OH/ UG STEEL 250.14 EA 250.14 5 400 tt-1P METER CAN 6 1 B60397*9275892 NS 0i42L3225R 42C 3PH N3 256 .03 EA 256.03 7 1 B80397*9275904 NS 0i42L3225G 42C 3PH N 1 136.98EA 135.98 8 1 880397*9275910 NS CH24L3125C 24C 3PH N1 73.76 EA 73.76 9 1 880397*9268873 NS PANEL BOARD PER ATTACHED 958 . 50 EA 958.50 10 1 B80397*9269063 NS ALLOWANCE FOR WIRE & 550.00 EA 550.00 11 MISC. HARDWARE 12 40 CCH120 20 0i120 C-H 20A SP CB 3.78 EA 151. 20 13 10 CCH250 20 CH250 C-H 50A 2P CB 8.87 EA 88.70 14 10 CCH230 20 0i230 C·H 30A 2P CB B.87 EA 88.70 15 10 CCH220 20 CH220 C-H 20A 2P CB 6.87 EA 88.70 16 SUBTOTAL LINE 3366 . 36 Bid Total: $3.366.36 Quoted By: Date: ;:Ç¡ç ~~ lU \l ~d-~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: ...... ~ Agenda Request Item Number Date: Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] c. -~Æ Feb. 5,2002 [ Xl [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ Board of County Commissioners Interim Community Development Dir Consider Draft Resolution 02-030 approving the request of ri re Recycling, Inc., for a Major Site Plan Adjustment approval to allow the construction of 43,000 square feet of industrial space for the project known as Florida Tire Recycling. (File No.: SPMJ-01-002) On December 22, 1987, this Board through Resolution 87-278 granted sile plan approval for a 6,000 square foot tire recycling/reuse project to be known as Flonda Tire Recycling, Inc. On March 22, 1993, the Community Development Director, via CD Order 93-006 granted a Major Adjustment to the approved Flonda Tire Recycling project for a 15,000 square foot addition. On August 23, 1995, the Community Development Director, via CD Order 95-010 granted a Major Adjustment to the approved Florida Tire Recycling project for the relocation of an approved 15, 000 square foot addition and stormwater improvements. On June 29, 2001, Flonda Tire Recycling, Inc., submitted an application for a Major Adjustment to the Florida Tire Recycling Site Plan. The applicant requested approval for 43,000 square feet of additional building space. The breakdown is as follows: New Building (#4) - 14,000 square feet metal tire processing building New Building (#5) ·7,500 square feet metal equipment canopy New Building (#6) . 20,000 square foot metal tire processing building Add 1,500 square foot Metal Canopy to existing Building #3. The proposed buildings will be constructed within the existing improved shell rock area formerly utilized for storage of shredded tire material. NlA NlA Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-030. COMMISSION ACTION: [J[J APPROVED 0 DENIED D OTHER (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) ~~ Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Onginating Dep!.: Finance: f}Y Coordination! Signatures Mg!. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: \w ....J COMMISSION REVIEW: February 5, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Assistant Community Development Director DATE: January 28, 2002 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 02-030, approving the request of Florida Tire Recycling, for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan approval for a 43,000 square foot expansion of the existing tire recycling/reuse project known as Florida Tire Recycling. (File No.: SPMJ-01-002) LOCATION: 9675 Range Line Road EXISTING ZONING: IH (Industrial High) IND (Industrial) LAND USE DESIGNATION: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: 33 ± Acres 43,000 square foot expansion of the Florida Tire Recycling project a. Construct new 14,000 square foot tire processing building (identified as Building #4); b. Construct new 7,500 square foot metal equipment canopy (identified as Building #5); c. Construct new 20,000 square foot tire processing building (identified as Building #6); and, d. Construct a 1,500 square foot metal canopy onto the existing Building #3. SURROUNDING LAND USE: To the North is Miami Tank (a.k.a Chem Te~ Supply Corp), to the west is the FEC Railroad and FPL Power Line to the south is the proposed CPV Cana Power Plant site (industrial). To the east is vacant agricultural land. The future land use designations for the surrounding properties are: IND (Industrial) to the north, south and west, to the east is AG-5. January 28, 2002 Page 2 '-' ..,,¡ Subject: Florida Tire Recycling SPMJ-01-002 SURROUNDING ZONING: IH (Industrial Heavy) to the north, south and west and AG- 5 (Agricultural - 1 du/5 acre) to the east. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Fire Station Number #11 (3501 Shinn Road) is located approximately 8 miles to the south. UTILITY SERVICE: Water and sewer services to be provided onsite through a well and septic system. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS: Right of Way Adequacy: See Comments Scheduled Area Improvements: See Comments TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity *********************..******...************ STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Section 11.02.07, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum Standards of Review for all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for Major Site Plan approval, utilizing these requirements and notes the following: A. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed building or use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County; and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. The proposed Major Adjustment to the approved Florida Tire Recycling site plan is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of this Code, the Sf. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Láws of St. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes maximum lot coverage by structures for the IND (Industrial) land use category as 40% - 50%. The proposed additions will increase the lot coverage to 5.2% of the overall coverage of the lot by building. January 28, 2002 Page 3 '-" ...J Subject: Florida Tire Recycling SPMJ-Q1-002 Objective 1.1.5. of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, which states that future development must be within the Planned Urban Service Area and directed to areas where urban and community services/facilities can be provided in the most efficient and compact manner so as to discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl. The existing Florida Tire Recycling facility is located within the Urban Service Area. There are currently no municipal services available in this area. The project will be serviced with onsite water and septic sewer system. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. Obiective 1.1.11 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, which states that the County shall work with interested groups and agencies to increase and broaden the economic base while expanding existing business and industrial opportunities. The existing tire recycling facility is 24,750 square feet in size. The applicant is proposing to increase the square footage of buildings on the site by 49,000 square feet. With new technology, the applicant has ·stated that additional jobs will be creatèd on this site. The applicant will provide a continuous economic benefit from the proposed manufacturing plant. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. B. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES 1 . The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse effect upon nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed 43,000 square foot expansion to the existing 24,750 square foot tire recycling/reuse facility has been determined not to have an undue or adverse effect upon nearby properties. To the north of the subject . property is located within a Heavy Industrial Zoning District. This zoning district was designated for high intense uses such as the applicant is proposing. The property to the south is where the proposed CPV Cana Power Plant is looking to be located. To the north is the Miami Tank facility (a.k.a Chem Tex Supply Company) and to the west is the FEe Railroad and FPL Power Lines. To the east is vacant agriculturally zoned property. The proposed project expansion will continue the current industrial development patterns along Range Line Road. The existing development has a preserved wetland with a 25-foot upland transitional zone around it. During the original construction of the Florida Tire Recycling facility the developer was required by the South Florida Water Management District to preserve the existing wetland and improve the vegetation zone around the wetland. The applicant as part of the requested amendment has brought the perimeter landscaping up to code. The improvements requested in this application, will occur within areas \w January 28, 2002 Page 4 ...",,¡ Subject: Florida Tire Recycling SPMJ-01-002 that have been cleared and have a shell rock base. This area was used for the storage of shredded tire pieces. 2. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. The applicant was required, as part of the site plan application, to bring the perimeter landscaping surrounding the property up to code. The requested expansion is being proposed within an area that was previously cleared and improved through a shell rock base. This area was utilized as a stockpile area for the storage of the shredded tire material from the operation. The applicant is proposing to utilize new techniques which will eliminate the necessity of having large piles of the shredded materials. Range Line Road will be screened from the proposed expansion via a 15- foot landscape buffer along the eastèrn property line. The applicant is being conditioned to increase the landscaping along the eastern property line (adjacent to Range Line Road) by a minimum of 15 trees. 3. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of neighboring properties. The property to the north is developed with heavy industrial uses; to the south is the proposed CPV Cana Power Plant site; to the west is additional heavy industrial uses and the East Coast Railroad and FPL Power Line; to the east is vacant agriculturally zoned property. The applicant is proposing to construct three new buildings on the site: Building #4 will be a 14,000 square foot metal tire processing building, Building #5 will be a 7,500 square foot metal equipment canopy, Building #6 will be a 20,000 square foot metal tire processing building. In addition, the applicant is proposing to construct a 1 ,500 square foot metal canopy on existing building #5. The proposed buildings will be located to the west of the existing buildings and buffered with an increased landscaping buffer along Range Line Road. Therefore, the proposed design of the project will not interfere with the development of surrounding properties. C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public Facilities. \w January 28, 2002 Page 5 ....J Subject: Florida Tire Recycling SPMJ-01-002 The proposed Florida Tire Recycling project will be serviced with onsite well and septic sewer system. D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION The applicant has obtained from the Sf. Lucie County Fire District written confirmation that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. The applicant has obtained written confirmation from the St. Lucie County Fire District that the proposed plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES The Florida Tire Recycling facility is a proposed non-residential uses. As such, there will be no direct impacts upon the County school system. Should any individual lot have a use that is later determined to have an effect on the County school system, appropriate reviews of those impacts will take place at that time. F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section 11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of the Sf. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, "Natural Environment Analysis'~ of the Sf. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (August, 1982). The applicant's proposed expansion is located within an area of the property that was previously cleared and improved as a shell rock storage area. At the time of the original site plan approval the applicant was required to preserve an existing wetland on the site. This wetland is depicted on the site plan with a 25-foot upland transitional zone surrounding it. COMMENTS Florida Tire Recycling, Inc., has applied for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan approval for the project known as Florida Tire Recycling. The proposed expansion is for 43,000 square feet (one 20,000 square foot metal building, one 14,000 square foot building, one 7,500 square foot metal canopy building and a 1,500 square foot canopy on an existing building, for subject property located at 9675 Range Line Road. " Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 02-030, which, if approved, would grant this request for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan approval, subject to the following condition: · Prior to issuance of any building permits the applicant shall submit an amended landscape plan which depicts an additional 178 inches of new trees along the perimeter of the site, to account for the relocated internal landscaping for this site. In lieu of providing additional perimeter plantings as required under this condition, the applicant January 28, 2002 Page 6 \w ...,j Subject: Florida Tire Recycling SPMJ-01-002 may pay to St. Lucie County the sum of $35,500.00 to be placed into a Forestry Restoration Fund to be administered by the County. The amount due is to be determined based upon the number of trees (DBH) inches required to meet minimum interior landscape code, multiplied by 1.5 and then multiplied by $200.0 per inch required. The condition shall not be interpreted to relieve the applicant, his successor or assign from meeting all perimeter landscape requirements. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-030. If you have any questions, please let us know. DJMlcs H :/wp/projects/1-complete/florida tire recycllngk/agenda/bccmemo.lnl cc: County Administrator Assl County Administrator County Attomey Public Works Director County Engineer Fire Marshall Joe Friscia, Friscia Engineering .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 . 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 \w ...., RESOLUTION 02-030 FILE NO.: SPMJ-01-o02 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A MAJOR ADJUSTMENT TO AN APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING IN THE IH (INDUSTRIAL HEAVY) ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Florida Tire Recvclina. Inc., presented a petition for a Major Adjustment to a: Major Site Plan to allow a 43,000 square foot expansion to the 24,750 square foot tire recycling/reuse facility known as Florida Tire Recycling on 33± acres of land at 9675 Range Line Road, in the IH (Industrial Heavy) Zoning Districtfor the property described in Part B below. 2. On December 22, 1987, this Board, through Resolution 87-278, approved the Site Plan for the project known as Florida Tire Recycling to allow a 6,000 square foot tire recycling facility. 3. On March 22, 1993, the Community Development Director, through CD Order 93-006, approved a Major Adjustment to the approved Florida Tire Recycling site plan to allow a 15,000 square foot expansion of the facility. 4. . On August 23, 1995, the Community Development Director, through CD Order 95-010, approved a Major Adjustment to the approved Florida Tire Recycling site plan to allow modifications to the 21,000 square foot facility. 5. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet all technical requirements and to be consistent with the future land use maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, subject to certain conditions set forth in Part A. 6. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. .. 7. With the conditions imposed pursuant to this Resolution, the proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. File No.: SPMF-01-002 January 28, 2002 Resolution 02-030 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 '-' ..."", 8. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect on the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design including upland and wetland buffers, landscaping and screening. 9. With the conditions imposed in Part A of this Resolution, the proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 10. The project will be serviced through onsite well water and septic sewer system. 11. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on February 5, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project to be known as Florida Tire Recycling, is hereby approved as depicted on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Friscia Engineering, dated 1/2/01, last revised 12-12-01/21/01, and date stamped received by the S1. Lucie County Community Development Director on 12/17/01, for the property described in Part B, subject to the following condition: · Prior to issuance of any building permits the applicant shall submit an amended landscape plan which depicts an additional 178 inches of new trees along the perimeter of the site, to account for the relocated internal landscaping for this site. In lieu of providing additional perimeter plantings as required under this condition, the applicant may pay to S1. Lucie County the sum of $35,500.00 to be placed into a Forestry Restoration Fund to be administered by the County. The amount due is to be determined based upon the number of trees (DBH) inches required to meet minimum interior landscape code, multiplied by 1.5 and then multiplied by $200.00 per inch required. The condition shall not be interpreted to relieve the applicant, his successor or assign from meeting all perimeter landscape requirements. B. The property on which this Major Site Plan approval is being granted is described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of Section 1, Township 37 South, Range 38 East, St. Lucie County, Florida; thence run south 00'00'54" west, along the East line of said Section 1, a distance of 1907.98 feet, to the Point of Beginning; thence continue south 00'00'54" west, along the east line of Section 1, a disiance of 660.00 feet; thence run north 89'59'06 west, a distance of 1320.00 feet; thence run north 00'00'54" east, a distance of 1242.49 feet, to the right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad; thence run north 44'46'00" east, along the said south right-of-way line, a distance of 884.93 feet; thence run south 00'00'54" west, a distance of 1210.93 feet; thence run south 89°59'06" east, a distance of 696.98 feet, to the Point of Beginning, all lying and being In Section 1, Township 37 South, File No.: SPMF-01-002 January 28, 2002 Resolution 02-030 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 '- "'«'fIll Range 38 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, and subject to a 660 feet Florida Power and Light Company Easement. Containing 32.83 acres, more or less. (Location: 9675 Range Line Road) C. This Major Adjustment to an Existing Site Plan shall expire on February 5, 2004, unless a building permit is issued or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. D. The Major Adjustment to an Existing Site Plan approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Florida Tire Recycling, Inc., including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations form the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to: the United States Army Corp of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. E. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on February 5, 2002, which certificate shall remain valid for the period of Site Plan approval. Should the Site Plan approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. F. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward xxx Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes xxx Commissioner John Bruhn xxx Commissioner Paula Lewis xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson .. xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 5th day of February 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS File No.: SPMF-01-002 January 28, 2002 Resolution 02-030 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 '-' ATTEST Deputy Clerk File No.: SPMF-Ol-002 January 28, 2002 ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY ...., Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS County Attorney .' Resolution 02-030 Page 4 .~ ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: '-' """ Agenda Request Item Number Date: C~Îb 02/05/02 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ Board of County Commissioners Community Developmenl enl Director Request of David N. Sowerby for an exemption from the require ents of Section 11.02.09(A)(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Muller Road SID - Minor Site Plan/preliminary Plat The developer of Muller Road SID is proposing a 4-lot residential subdivision to be located on Muller road. The developer of Muller Subdivision is requesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 11.02.09(A)(5)(d) requires that all site plans with wetlands located on site, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions. The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration by the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environment. The proposed Muller Road SID is located in an old orange grove on Muller Road. N/A None Staff recommends approval of the request of David N. Sowerby for relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code COMMISSION ACTION: QCJ APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER (4-0) (Hutchinson County Attomey Originating Dept.: Finance: Absent) CONCURRENCE: (/7 t-r~ Douglas M. Ander,:>0n County Administrator Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: .. , ~ ....., Commission Review: February 5, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Assistant Community Development Director DATE: January 30, 2002 SUBJECT: Petition of David N. Sowerby for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code for the project to be known as Muller Road Subdivision. Muller Road Subdivision is a proposed 4 lot residential subdivision located on the north side of Muller Road, approximately 300 feet west of N.S.L.W.M.D. Canal No. 93. The developer of Muller Road SID is reguesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of tile St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 11.02.09(A)(5)(d) requires that all site plans with wetlands located on site, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmental Impact Report (ErR). The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proRosed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions. The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration l:5y the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environment. Staff has reviewed the request for waiver of this report and has determined that the proposed residential project would not negatively affect any environmentally sensitive areas on the subject property. The subject property is the location of an old grove. Staff recommends that this request for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) be approved and that no environmental impact report be required for this project. hf cc: David N. Sowerby, Esqu County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Planning Manager '-' ..."",¡ MELVILLE & SOWERBY, P.L. ATTORNEYS AT LAW LAUREL PROFESSIONAL PARK 2940 SOUTH 25TH STREËT FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34981-5605 HAROLD G. MELVILLE, P.A.* DAVID N. SOWERBY. P.L.** TELEPHONE (56 ) 464~7900 FAX (561) 464~8220 *BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER AND BOARD CERTIFIED BUSINESS LITIGATION LAWYER ..BOARO CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE LAWYER January 18,2002 VIA HAND DELIVERY Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie County, Florida c/o Planning Department 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Attention: David Kelly RE: Request for Full Relief from the requirement of an Environmental Impact Report on Muller Road Subdivision Dear Members of the County Commission: Request is hereby made pursuant to Section 11.02.09(A)5.a.2 that relief be given from the requirement of an Environmental Impact Report on Muller Road Subdivision. The property being subdivided consists entirely of an old orange grove and does not contain any wetland, forest areas, hammocks, environmentally sensitive vegetation or environmentally sensitive wildlife. An aerial photograph of the subject property is attached (with the subject property identified by heavy border) which supports the fact that the property consists entirely of old grove land. Consequently, I am hereby requesting that the Board of County Commissioners grant relief from the requirement of an Environmental Impact Report. r spectfully submitted, \'. Û~~ avid N. Sowerby DNS/njo Enclosure ~. r.~.J .~.. ~ n \VJJ_ 00.... ~ ) r;'. ((!1 ~_) JAN 232002 !¡ u ._._..~.__._._1 CC ... ¡ L :';ëi..Ui';·,IENT ~,~. '::¡:: cC'-!,"IY. FL '-' ...., Muller Road Subdivision 5ìT.h~~~ Cij.Q ?r..J:..-~ Parcel boundary N Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map prepl!Wed Jaooary 30, 2002 n..."..p"'ÞoIn~lDrge:wlll~__~....., __ -r.6..U_ '-' _ '" po<MOII" -Q. --- -'~.t.""'n...- b"-_..loJbIrdng ~ t Seale 1" - 300' Agenda Request Item Nu~r Date: C -I C/ February 5, 2002 Consent Regular Public Hearing leg. [ ] [X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ ] Submitted By: Community Development - TOURISM To: Board of County Commissioners uni y Development Dir SUBJECT: Tourism Advertising Grant Agreement - Treasure Coast Manatee Foundation/Sea Cows on Parade BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAilABLE: Funds are available in Account Number 611-5210-582000-500 Aid to Private Organization, 11,000. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed advertising agreement for the Treasure Coast Manatee Foundation/Sea Cows on Parade, and authorize the chairman to sign the agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: [i] APPROVED [] DENIED D OTHER (4-0) (HilT,....],; n~nn Absent) CONCURRENCE: r(7t7L Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County AttorneyW Originating Dept.: $.== Finance: Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Wb; Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND538a) ·" \...- ",.; Tourism Memorandum To: Board of County Commissioners From: Gayla Barwick, Tourism Date: January 30, 2002 Re: Tourism Advertising Grant Agreement - Treasure Coast Manatee Foundation/Sea Cows on Parade BACKGROUND: In accordance with previous Board direction, the Tourist Development Coundl has instituted an advertising grant program to assist local organizations in promoting their events. The grants are paid from Tourist Development Tax funds. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the proposed grant agreement for the Treasure Coast Manatee Foundation/Sea Cows on Parade. Pursuant to the agreement, Treasure Coast Manatee Foundation/Sea Cows on Parade will receive an advertising grant in the amount of one thousand and 00/100 ($1,000.00). CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Proposed advertising grant agreement for the Treasure Coast Manatee Foundation/Sea Cows on Parade, and authorize the chainnan to sign the agreement. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~..,~-'è)c) Gayla Ba ck, Tourism Manager Attachment Copies to: County Administrator County Attorney Finance Director Management and Budget Director Interim Community Development Director Contracts Coordinator . ,i '-' ....J ADVERTISING GRANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of A.D. 2002, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision ofÙle State of Florida, hereinafter called Ùle "County", and TREASURE COAST MANATEE FOUNDATION, or its successors, executors, administrators, and assigns hereinafter called Ùle "Recipient". IN CONSIDERATION ofÙle mutual benefits received by each part, Ùle parties mutually agree as follows: I. The County shall disperse to the Recipient a grant in the amount of one thousand and 00/100 dollars ($1,000.00) to be used to as set forth in its 2001-2002 Advertising Grant Application, incorporated herein by reference. Payment to the Recipient shall be made in one lump sum payment within thirty (30) days after the Recipient submits all required proof of publication or airing, as appropriate, to the St. Lucie County Tourism Development Manager. For a print advertisement, the Recipient shall submit an original or photocopy of the advertisement and the front cover of the publication showing the date of publication. For a television or radio commercial, the Recipient shall submit an affidavit from the station indicating the air dates and times. 2. Within sixty (60) days of the event, the Recipient shall provide the St. Lucie County Tourism Development Manager with a report on the event funded by the grant including, but not limited to, Ùle number of attendees, a listing of hotels and/or other accommodations used during the event, the number of room nights generated by the event, and a copy of the event brochure, flyer or poster used in marketing the event. 3. The Recipient shall have internal controls adequate to safeguard the grant. 1 :., '-"' ~ 4. If the grant can not be used or a subsequent audit reveals the grant was not used according to this Agreement, any money not so used shall be reimbursed to the County. I ! 5. The Recipient gives the County the right, until the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure of funds under this agreement, to audit the use of the grant monies. Upon demand, the County shall have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Recipient involving transactions related to these grant monies. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or until the expiration of three (3) years after the expenditure of the funds. 6. The Recipient is and shall be an independent contractor, responsible to all parties for all of its acts or omissions and the County shall in no way be responsible for such acts or omission. The Recipient shall and will indemnify and hold harmless the County from and against any and all liability, claims, damages, expenses, fees, fines, penalties, suits, proceedings, and actions and cost of actions, including reasonable attorney's fees of any kind and nature arising or growing out of or in any way connected with the use, occupations, administration or control of the above described services by the Recipient or its agents, employees, customers, patrons or invitee, or resulting from injury to person or property, or a loss of life or property of any kind or nature whatsoever sustained during the term of this Agreement. The Recipient hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this Agreement include specific consideration for the indemnification provided herein. 8. The Recipient agrees to comply with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 9. All publications, media productions and exhibit graphics shall include the following statement: Sponsored in part by the S1. Lucie County Tourist Development Council. 10. Any notice shall be in writing and sent registered or certified mail, postage and charges 2 '\r ...- prepaid, and addressed to the parties at the following address: To the County: With copies to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia A venue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Tourism Development Manager 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 To the Recipient: Treasure Coast Manatee Foundation Post Office Box 3191 Fort Pierce, Florida 34948-3191 II. No amendment, modification or waiver of this Agreement shall be valid or effective unless in writing and signed by both parties and no waiver of any breach or condition of this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other conditions or subsequent breach whether of like or different nature. If the County currently provides or subsequently provides any forms for agreement modification, the Recipient agrees to use said forms. 12. Except as otherwise provided, this agreement shall be binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the parties. 13. The Recipient represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes 112.311 (2000) and as may be amended from time to time. The Recipient further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said performance. The Recipient shall promptly notify the County in writing by certified mail of all potential 3 !.' ~ ...., conflicts of interest prohibited by existing state law for any prospective business association, interest or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence the Recipient's judgment or quality of services being provided hereunder. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of work that the Recipient may undertake and request an opinion of the County as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the County, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the Recipient. The County agrees to notify the Recipient of its opinion by certified mail within thirty (30) days of receipt of notification by the Recipient. If, in the opinion of the County, the prospective business association, interest or circumstance would not constitute a conflict of interest by the Recipient, the County shall so state in the notification and the Recipient shall, at his/her option, enter into said association, interest or circumstance and it shall be deemed not in conflict of interest with respect to services provided to the County by the Recipient under the terms of this Agreement. 14. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. 15. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous conununications, representations or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. 4 , ,. ~ ..., IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized officials as of the day and year first written above. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: TREASURE COAST MANATEE FOUND A nON BY: AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE NAl\1E: (Print) TITLE: g:\agreemnt\contract\tdc.ad.seacows. wpd 5 i Agenda Request \....; tem Nu~er Date: ~-lD February 5, 2002 Consent Regular Public Hearing leg. [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ Submitted By: Community Development - TOURISM To: Board of County Commissioners Int . unit Development Dir SUBJECT: Tourism Special Event Grant Agreement - The Saints of Port St. Lucie Golf Course BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAilABLE: Funds are available in Account Number 611-5210-582000-500 Aid to Private Organization, $1,000. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed special event agreement for The Saints of Port St.· Lucie Golf Course, and authorize the chairman to sign the agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED 0 DENIED c=J OTHER (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) CONCURRENCE: r;z~~ Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney ~ Originating Dept.: ~ Finance: Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: J1# m~ Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND538a) -....; """ Tourism ¡ I I, ¡ , Memorandum To: Board of County Commissioners From: Gayla Barwick, Tourism Date: January 30, 2002 Re: Tourism Special Event Grant Agreement - The Saints at Port St. Lucie Golf Course BACKGROUND: In accordance with previous Board direction, the Tourist Development Coundl has instituted a special event grant program to assist local organizations in promoting their events. The grants are paid from Tourist Development Tax funds. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the proposed grant agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, The Saints at Port St. Lude Golf Course will receive a spedal event grant in the amount of one thousand and 00/100 ($1,000.00). CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed special event grant agreement for The Saints at Port St. Lude Golf Course, and authorize the chainnan to sign the agreement. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~..,,~~ GayaBa 'ck, Tourism Manager Attachment Copies to: County Administrator County Attorney Finance Director Management and Budget Director Interim Community Development Director Contracts Coordinator , ... \.,.. '-' "wtI .....,/ Special Event Grant I I We at The Saints at Port St Lucie G.C. were honored and excited to be contacted by The Juniors Champion Tour and asked to host one of their televised events. Our first thought was will the course be ready, it will be and we are gearing up for this event. Although the participants fees will be waived for this event we felt the exposure received will provide the opportunity to showcase area businesses, the City and County and of course The Saints at Port St. Lucie Golf Course. With the number of contestants with families and spectators from allover the state, we anticipate increased business for area restaurants, retail stores and hotels. Your consideration for this request is greatly appreciated. Special Note: Statewide exp)sure will be gained for the County and and the course throuqh Sunshine Network with two 1-minute ads. . .' \... '-' "-' .....J SPECIAL EVENT GRANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of AD. 2002, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the "County", and CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE, a Florida Municipal Corporation, or its successors, executors, administrators, and assigns hereinafter called the "Recipient". IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits received by each part, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1. The County shall disperse to the Recipient a grant in the amount of one thousand and 00/100 dollars ($1,000.00) to be used for the Junior Champions Tour at The Saints at Port S1. Lucie G.C. as set forth in its Special Event Grant Application, incorporated herein by reference. Payment to the Recipient shall be made in one lump sum payment within thirty (30) days of the date this Agreement is fully executed. 2. Within sixty (60) days following the event or the date of this Agreement, whichever is later, the Recipient shall provide the St. Lucie County Tourism Development Manager with a report on the event funded by the grant including, but not limited to, the number of attendees at the event, a list of hotels and/or other accommodations used by participants and attendees at the event, the number of room nights generated by the event, and a copy of the brochure, flyer or poster used to market the event. 3. The Recipient shall have internal controls adequate to safeguard the grant. 4. If the grant can not be used or a subsequent audit reveals the grant was not used according to this Agreement, any money not so used shall be reimbursed to the County. 1 J " \..- '-" "-" ...I S. The Recipient gives the County the right, until the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure offunds under this agreement., to audit the use of the grant monies. Upon demand, the County shall have access to and the right to exanùne any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Recipient involving transactions related to these grant monies. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or until the expiration of three (3) years after the expenditure of the funds. 6. The Recipient is and shall be an independent contractor, responsible to all parties for all ofits acts or omissions and the County shall in no way be responsible for such acts or omission. The Recipient shall and will indemnify and hold hannless the County from and against any and all liability, claims, damages, expenses, fees, fines, penalties, suits, proceedings, and actions and cost of actions, including reasonable attorney's fees of any kind and nature arising or growing out of or in any way connected with the use, occupations, administration or control of the above described services by the Recipient or its agents, employees, customers, patrons or invitee, or resulting from injury to person or property, or a loss of life or property of any kind or nature whatsoever sustained during the term of this Agreement. The Recipient hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this Agreement include specific consideration for the indemnification provided herein. 7. The Recipient agrees to comply with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 8. All publications, media productions and exhibit graphics shall include the following statement: Sponsored in part by the 81. Lucie County Tourist Development Council. 9. Any notice shall be in writing and sent registered or certified maiL postage and charges prepaid, and addressed to the parties at the following address: 2 !, .. '-' ~ -...J ...., To the County: Wrth copies to: St. Lucie County Adnñnistrator 2300 Vlfginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Vtrginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 S1. Lucie County Tourism Development Manager 2300 Vlfginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 To the Recipient: Port 81. Lucie City Manager 121 S. W. Port S1. Lucie Boulevard Port 81. Lucie, Florida 34984 10. No amendment, modification or waiver of this Agreement shall be valid or effective unless in writing and signed by both parties and no waiver of any breach or condition of this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other conditions or subsequent breach whether of like or different nature. If the County currently provides or subsequently provides any forms for agreement modification, the Recipient agrees to use said forms. II. Except as otherwise provided, this agreement shall be binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the parties. 12. The Recipient represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the peñormance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes 112.311 (2001) and as may be amended from time to time. The Recipient further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said peñormance. The Recipient shall promptly notify the County in writing by certified mail of all potential conflicts of interest prohibited by existing state law for any prospective business association, interest 3 .,.-.'~" . .~-\.t \.t v ...J AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. Cs DATE: February 5,2002 "Investment for the Future" SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: ~~j.~ (Donald B. West, P.E. County Engineer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Work Authorization NO.3 to the Contract for Professional Services related to Stormwater Management with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., for Harmony Heights Stormwater Master Plan BACKGROUND: This item was approved at the January 15, 2002 Board meeting. The agenda should have read $67,099.84. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will Qe made available in 102001-3725-563005-42507 Drainage Maintenance- MSTU PREVIOUS ACTION: 1/15/02 - Board approved work authorization. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the contract amount of $67,099.84. Contract has been signed. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [xl APPROVED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) [ ] DENIED (Hutchinson Absent) f/?4~ Douglas Anderson County Administrator ~ [x]County Attorney t . [x]Originating Dept. Public Works ~. [ ]Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) harmony heights drainage.ag CoordinatlonlSianatures [x]Mgt. & Budget tI/J) !YJ~ [x]Co. Eng~W ' [x¡Revenue Coord~t\ [ ¡Other '--' '-" ......, ....I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C 8 DATE: February 5,2002 "Investment for the Future" TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: ft~~1·~ (Donald B. West, P.E. County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Work Authorization NO.3 to the Contract for Professional Services related to Stormwater Management with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., for Harmony Heights Stormwater Master Plan BACKGROUND: This item was approved at the January 15, 2002 Board meeting. The agenda should have read $67,099.84. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in 102001-3725-563005-42507 Drainage Maintenance- MSTU PREVIOUS ACTION: 1/15/02 - Board approved work authorization. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the contract amount of $67,099.84. Contract has been signed. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Ole,,"". ^"'""Y ~~ [x]Originating Dept. Public Works CoordinationlS illnatu res [x]Mgt. & Budget 'f¡¿{) mtvÚ!5¡ [x]Co. Eng~W . [x]Revenue Coord~\'\ [ ]other [ ]Finance (check for copy only. if applicable) harmony heights drainage.ag ·~ '-" '-' ...; AGENDA REQUEST "Invj~.~., '.. . -~O~h~)~t5r~hiì., I' II,,, Ii 11 I . '. I'~; .M , 83m !IL;:), ,···,JL . J I .- . ---- I E~:r'-' eo r':'~~'J\~~ I TO: BOARD OF COUNTY CeMM+SsteNERS~::"- ITEM NO. ~ DATE: January 15, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Work Authorization NO.3 to the Contract for Professional Services related to Stormwater Managemen1 with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., for Harmony Heights Stormwater Master Plan BACKGROUND: The Harmony Heights Homeowners' Association has requested St. Lucie County provide drainage anc roadway improvements to their ~ubdivision. Roadway improvements cannot be constructed without fjrs1 improving drainage in the subdivision. The attached engineering proposal from BCI outlines the scope of services for the development of c stormwater master plan to include project management, design, modeling, cost estimate, and permitting This will be work authorization no. 3 with BCI in the amount of $66,235.20 . FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in 102001-3725-563005- 42507 Drainage Maintenance MSTU PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Work Authorization NO.3 with BCI in the amount of $66,235.2C for the development of a stormwater master plan for Harmony Heights Subdivision and authorization fo the Chairman to sign. [X] APPROVED [] OTHER: [ ] DENIED ~ COMMISSION ACTION: [x]County Attorney ~/ [x]Originaling Dept. Public Works ;(;4. /" Coordi nation/S iQ natu res [x]Mgt. & Budget µp (111 i1t2.) [x]Co. Eng ~~ ~. ( I [x]Revenue Coord~ t\ []Other [ ]Finance (check for copy only. if applicable) harmony heights drainage.ag \r ,-". ,..."i WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.3 ..., . Engineering Services Related to Stormwater Management COO-06-086 for Harmony Heights Drainage'lmprovements Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. (the "Engineer") dated June 13, 2000, the Engineer agrees to provide the Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A" and for the Compensation described in Exhibit "B". All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit "e". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ~.."......~... .~.~.."... BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ;..?!:;.~~(!~t(ò.. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, F710R A ¿ " - . \".. ~ f f , " "', BY: . ~S¡\).. ... '....i.i,f.~JI C~~IRM . ~>:~~ ........ . ..~<, Date: 1/ 1.5'/ (1]-- ~~~~ J / APPR~.~ AS ..TO F. O~RM AND COR!l¡i¡Jf(4? éOUNTY VRNEY -' ENGINEER ! ' BY, Ú/llf(¿'fLt1 Print Name: Walter R. Reigner BCI Engineers & Scientists. Inc. Date: December 26, 2001 \..- '- ~. -..",# EXHIBIT A ST. LUCIE COUNTY ENGINEERING -DIVISION Harmony Heights Master Drainage & Roadway Improvements Plan Scope of Services I. Description St. Lucie County Stormwater Management Services II. Provisions for Work Engineering services will be accomplished in accordance with the St. Lucie County Continuing Engineering Services Contract. III. Project Description - Harmony Heights Master Drainage & Roadway Improvements Plan This work will be accomplished in compliance with local water management district requirements. IV. Scope of Services BCI will provide project management and engineering services using staff and resources from our Lakeland office to provide full technical support to St. Lucie County. BCI will be assisted by Pickett & Associates for survey services for the project. BCI will provide all equipment and materials necessary to conduct these engineering services. It is understood that St. Lucie County desires to develop a master plan for the approximately 320 acre Harmony Heights subdivision as shown on Exhibit D. Specifically, St. Lucie County Public Warks desires to use milled asphalt for the roads within the subdivision. However the existing drainage level of service is deficient. The subdivision is bordered by Taylor Creek (SFWMD Canal C-25) to the south and Ft. Pierce Farms Water Control District's (FPFWCD) Canal No. I on the north. The subdivision has numerous small depressional areas that flood the road rights-of-way and yards as well. It is unknown at this time what the extent of structure flooding is in the area. St. Lucie Public Works desires to develop a master plan that will allow the County to improve the drainage within the subdivision in a phased approach. Roadway improvements will be possible concurrent with or after the drainage improvements have been made. St. Lucie County has requested that BCI provide an engineering scope of services to assist the County in developing the Master Plan with consideration for cost estimation for phasing purposes, conceptual and final permitting and design, and other tasks as needed. Design for Phase One will be conducted under a separate task work order and BCI understands that the County desires the phasing plan to allow for minimal or no land acquisition in the area designated for Phase One. S1. Lucie County understands that SFWMD desires to participate in funding the project due to the improvement in water quality discharges that can be realized for Taylor Creek and the Indian River Lagoon. Services to be managed and developed during the term of this agreement will address development of the Master Plan, conceptual cost estimation and permitting. These services will specifically include: ~ '-' Exhibit A- Harmony Heights Master Plan Page2of4 .....,; -...,¡¡J · Project Meetings including a kickoff meeting and three other meetings (with County staff) to be scheduled when the County deems most beneficial to the project. · Aerial topographic services of the project area will be provided to assist with the planning and design work of this project. o Establish sufficient survey ground control throughout the project site (5 points estimated). o Acquire Black and White aerial photography and production of Topographic and Planimetric Mapping with (me-foot contour interval and a map scale of 1 "=50'. The expected accuracies on the spot heights would be 0.25'. Photography would allow for clear resolution at a 1 "=30' scale. o Provide digital deliverables in ACAD®vI4 and Geo-tiffformats on the correct horizontal and vertical datum. o All mapping work shall meet or exceed the Florida Minimum Technical Standards as set forth in Rule 61 G 17. Contours in partially obscure areas will be dashed and accuracy standards will not apply in these areas. Areas totally obscured will be left blank and designated as such. o Collect elevation, size and location data for primary culverts within the project area. · Convert property appraiser parcel line work to Autocad®-format line work. Information included shall be parcel lot numbers, parcel dimensions, right-of-way lines, and street names for the active project area. · Collect grab sample of representative discharge from one of the existing outfall pipes serving the subdivision. This sample will be analyzed for TSS, TP and TN forthe purposes of more accurately quantifying the existing pollutant loads from the subdivision (as opposed to strictly using regional event mean concentrations for these pollutant parameters). · Conduct hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the existing system using an industry standard model such as adICPR®. Quasi-calibration will be attempted for a given storm event data in which flood level data is available. The proposed conceptual drainage system will then be modeled. It is our understanding St. Lucie County desires roadside swales and appropriate culvert cross drainage. The concept drainage design will allow for a level of service standard for the I O-year!1 day storm event. Storm water quality (pollutant loads) will be modeled and estimated for select critical pollutant parameters for the existing and proposed conditions using a spreadsheet model. · Attend a pre-application meeting with SFWMD to discuss the requirements for submittal of a Conceptual ERP permit. BCI understands that an impervious roadway course should be assumed for permitting purposes as it is difficult to predict whether asphalt millings, cold mix, or standard asphaltic concrete will be used in construction. · Attend a pre-application meeting with FPFWCD to assess permitting requirements during future phases. FPFWCD representatives have advised BCI to meet with them to discuss permitting issues as FPFWCD does not have a conceptual permit option. Therefore BCI anticipates project deliverables to include attendance of the pre-application meeting and submittal of meeting minutes to FPFWCD. Minutes will ask for confirmation on what will be required from a permitting standpoint for future permit application submittal (with ~ '- Exhibit Á- Harmony Heights Master Plan Page 3 of 4 ....,; ......, Phase 1 construction design). · Preparation of a concept phasing and master drainage and roadway plan for (60% and 100%) two reviews and approval by St. Lucie County. The plan will consist of a report with a discussion of the following: o Background & Data Sources o Existing Conditions (Hydrologic and Hydraulic) o Existing Conditions (Water Quality) o Problem Areas o Level of Service o Regulatory Requirements o Recommended Parcel and Easement Acquisitions o Recommendations with Phasing Cost Estimates o Phasing Layout Plan o Concept Drainage & Roadway Improvement Plan (Overlay on Aerials) · It is anticipated that storm water detention facilities may be required to facilitate both grant funding and permit acquisition and this will be known based on the pre-application meeting with the WMD. Necessary land parcel and easement needs will be identified through this task. It is our understanding the County is prepared for such contingencies. · Coordination with utility companies (sanitary and potable water) relative to the project phasing to assess the utilities' future plans and how they relate to the Master Plan. This project could potentially qualify under CDBG or other types of public works funding programs. · Preparation of engineer's opinion of probable cost for surveying, engineering design, construction and maintenance of all phases of the project. · Preparation and submittal of a conceptual permit application to the SFWMD. Should the WMD have requests for additional information, BCI will provide responses to two rounds of comments (as applicable) from the WMD. We have assumed that several isolated wetlands exist in the project area and that sufficient staff effort is provided to coarsely delineate the wetlands for purposes of acknowledging their existence in the permit application. Details of the conceptual permit objectives will be developed based on input received at the pre-application meeting. BCI understands that St. Lucie County desires to avoid commitments on timing of individual phase construction, until funding sources have been identified. · Project Progress Reports- Monthly status reports will be provided to S1. Lucie County. Additionally, we anticipate much communication during the concept design phase to ensure the County has constant input on the proposed design. It is anticipated that the final deliverables will include the following: · Stormwater Master Plan Report including phase cost estimates, funding sources discussion, drainage level of service projections, and phasing schedule; · Conceptual design plans including a phasing plan sheet and conceptual drainage improvements plan sheets with aerial topographic information; . SFWMD Conceptual Environmental Resource Pem1it. jc~ "- Exhibit A- Harmony Heights Master Plan Page 4 of 4 ..".¡ "WIfJ Items Specifically not Included in the Scope of Work and associated budget include: · Stormwater Modeling associated with Final Design FEMA Map Revisions Agency Permit Application Fees Easement Negotiations/Agreements Boundary, RJW, Topographic Survey (except as outlined above) Ground Water Modeling Contamination Assessments Wetland Delineation (Minimum Survey standards) or Impacts Assessment Design Engineering, Plans Preparation or Design Survey Construction Related Services Permit submittal through FPFWCD · · · V. Information Provided by St. Lucie County S1. Lucie County will provide plat maps, as-built plans of known improvements in the project area, drainage maps, GIS coverages of parcel data, topographic information and other similar County information. St. Lucie Cowlty staff will convert property appraiser parcel information coverages (DGN format) to Autocad® file format with no manipulation of line work. VI. Period of Service BCI will provide the services for the above scope upon receiving a notice to proceed. The project will be completed with the final deliverable made per the attached project schedule (Exhibit C) to comply with the probable grant funding schedule. v '- ...,,' ....., Exhibit B ST. LUCIE COUNTY - CONTINUING ENGINEERING SERVICES (STORMWATER) BCI LABOR COST AND EXPENSES Project Name: Work Order 3 - Harmony Heights Master Plan Development St Lucie County Project Manager: BCI Project Number: Date: Don West. P.E. W1910668.30 4-Jan-Q2 .... .:: -: -: :ébst ESTIMATE -: -:: _. 1-:-:-::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..- . . . . . . . . . ... .. . .... LUMP SUM TASK ACTIVITY COST BY TASK 1 Project Meetings & Contract Management $7,739_20 2 Aerial Topographic Work $10,591.36 3 Property Appraiser File Conversion for Parcel $4,957.12 Base Map 4A Hydrologic/Hydraulic/Quality Spreadsheet Modeling $9,103_36 4B Water Quality Analyses $504.00 5A Pre-application Meeling with SFWMD $1,451.52 5B Pre-application Meeting with FPFWCD $864.64 6A Master Plan Development $21.728_00 6B Response to County Reviews of Concept Plans/Final $5.783_68 Report 7 Conceptual ERP Application Preparation/Response $4.376.96 Total Work Order Cost $67,099.84 TOTAL LUMP SUM COST $67,O99~4 Sheet 1 of 1 "" .... i -- ------- ~~ i I i I Q I ,----1-- --- § I .., - -- --- 1 1 I I ! I ! .__ ____1--.__'_...._.' I I I ¡; I :i: , I , "¡: 1 « I I I , .. I I Cll , I :i: , : 1 LL!o_ ---1 , 0... ("') ..c --8 . I -a:i-.f ---- ~ -- t----- ----j ûí <!) - , IOJ <!) I--r f s ~ _ ~ -- "-----1 ----1 ' c I (j) - æ __-l_ : , 0 I' s"- .., , " "0 f--- " I ¡, ": C ~ a. ..1 øl Cl, Cll C Cll ~ ... +J 1$ 01 I III .5!!.1 'Cll a! .. ¡~ à:ø >-:j!l OJ J:2 +J l..c ::::I -Z='I E ,C'Cl-cC::::I ðl "ã) Q) ðl~ UJ:"f3Ulo U (1)1 >-00 Q)1.5!!. +J , .;-:: I' Co +J,';-:: 1 0 I ._1...., O· VI"', £'::::1, E Q) ::::I!a.i i..c ...J, ... 1"0 ...J 1_ , ><I.....¡ CllI ...,..... ¡U; W (J)IJ:Ia.I(J)¡1ll1 ..".¡ 0... g « ~ ::J .., C) I - I I I I I I i I . c o l:ê .. (,) tIl Q Cl .:.:: tIl ell I- I ' , I <1)1 ~I i ! 0 I g> 1 ~ I "fii I I 15 'c <I) ~ :2 ø c: .21 c EEl c·Q '" '" E ~ I O ~ oøä:.cQ) I "- ~ 0 _:::JQ.¡ ëü (5 ~ ~g-~n.1 E u 3: ;; U f5 '-1 .2 co LL~ -g ð +:: 51' ! E",ro (I)!ëOü~,Q.: Q)IDO 11Q.)a::~ro¡( ) I :n .~ W ~¡ E;"O å¡ ~¡cç¡_: .~ è:Q U I: ..., 1 '"-I· ¡ij 0 0. CJ' "0 , c 0 Q) 0 T""" -..... (1)1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I :g, -g .Q ~ -ECll'1 - .f; ëñ .- c: Q.) I ~ (t1 ro .D ._ Q.>.c"E oOI·-ã.u COw =:J Q) Cl0:¡:=; C1r: Q)= Ò3 WI ëiJ 2: 8! 0 ~ ~ Iou ~.~ -' CI) " Q U .- 0.,_ 1:1« Qj "'I _(f)O:::CI.>"ã.I....1c...o 00) ~ëii Q ,"-Q ¡~u"".s .~.- ~ - (\ , 10 c ~ I E ëii ill I e ID Q) __ ~iro 0 å ID elm 0. «Iii: :J o.i:2 u <D 0. ii:i:2[ I I I ¡ I I , ....,- I I ~-f- I.Q) -f-- ¡¡; -f--- O:::-f-- è:' -f-- .9_~ (\) ::J -f-- ~- Q) 0:::-£ o-~ .2=--.- -§_I- _o_0 o OJ (/ -(/ Q)-Q) ro ro 0-0 u_u c c ~ 11IIII I I i 0> c ,ii '" Q g, ~, '"-, 0' :21 3:' >- Qj § c o ë Q 0> .s ë j I 1i 'a¡ U Q n::: - 'Ë (¡¡ 0. åi Õ z ...... .."", "" :I ....., ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 4 District 5 AGENDA February 5, 2002 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held January 22,2002. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY Mosquito Control District's Request for Exemption from Fort Pierce Community Redevelopment Agency - Staff request direction from the Board as to how to proceed. /tf¡fJ.-' CONSENT AGENDA r; [, (;, 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 17 and 18. NOTICE: All proceedings berore this Board are electronicaU)" recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings wUl need a record ofthe proceedings and Corsuth purpose may need to ensure th21 a verbatim record ofthe proceedings is m..ade. Upon the requestofany party to the proceediois, individuals testifying during a bearing will be sworn in. Any party to tbe proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone witb a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the Sl. Lucie County Community Services Mana¡:er at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 atlea,t forty-elght(48) houn prior 10 lhe meed.g. '" '- 02/01/02 FZABWARR FUND TITLE 145 Mosquito Fund ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD '-' .J WARRANT LIST #18- 26-JAN-2002 TO 01-FEB-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 11,791. 59 11,791. 59 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 23,072.73 23,072.73 \r '- .....,¡ ..-i 01/25/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE P"Zl,.BWARR WARRANT LIST #17- 19-JAN-2002 TO 25-JAN-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND TI TLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 145 Mosquito Fund 17,700.53 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 17,700.53 0.00 ~ AGENDA REQUEST ~ .., ITEM NO. .:b '-r """ DATE: February 5, 2002 REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Mosquito Control District's Request for Exemption from fort Pierce Community Redevelopment Agency BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum fUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff requests direction from the Board as to how to proceed. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: rx] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Hutchinson Absent) ~~ . Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Public Works Dir: County Eng.: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 " '-' .... ....., ...., , INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners Mosquito Control Director FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO: 02-138 DATE: January 23, 2002 SUBJECT: Mosquito Control District's Request for Exemption from Fort Pierce Community Redevelopment Agency BACKGROUND: In June 2001, the Mosquito Control District requested that the City of Fort Pierce exempt the Mosquito Control District from the tax increment financing provisions of Section 163.387. A copy of the June 28, 2001 letter from Mr. Anderson is attached. As indicated in Mr. Anderson's letter, the District believed it was exempt pursuant to Section 163.387(c)2 which provides: (C) The following public bodies or taxing authorities created prior to July 1, 1993 are exempt from paragraph (a) (2) A special district, the sole available source of revenue of which is ad valorem taxes at the time an ordinance is adopted under this section. The District claims it is covered under the subsection because, although the District has received state funding in the past, those funds are not guaranteed "entitlements" and are subject to the discretion of the Florida Legislature in their annual appropriation process. The only available guaranteed source of revenue the District may claim is its ad valorem tax. The City forwarded the County's request to the Community Redevelopment Agency Board. County staff appeared before the CRA Board at CRA meetings on August 29, 2001, September 19,2001 and October 31,2001. At the October 31 meeting, the CRA Board voted to recommend denial of the County's request. A copy of the October 31 minutes are attached. The Fort Pierce City Commission then advertised a public hearing on January 7,2002 to consider the County's request. To the best of staff's knowledge, the County was never '-" """ ~ ...,rJ I notified of this public hearing. County staff became aware of the hearing when staff reviewed the Commission agenda on January 7, the day of the hearing. At the hearing, the City Commission voted 4-1 (Commissioner Benton dissenting) to deny the County's request. The City Manager indicated that in view of the relatively small ($1,400) impact on the Mosquito Control District budget, the City would be willing to reconsider the County's request again in future years if the budget impact became more severe. City staff indicated that they would also be willing to consider having the CRA perform in-kind services that would benefit the Mosquito Control District. As an aside, the CRA's attorney had previously indicated that before the CRA could perform Mosquito Control services, that the CRA's powers would need to be expanded to include Mosquito Control services. DISCUSSION: In reviewing the County's options, staff will first discuss the options proposed by City staff as follows: A. Apply for Exemption in Future Years According to the Mosquito Control Director, the effect of the exemption denial will soon become significant because of the City's expansion of the CRA's boundaries. The Director has estimated that at some point the District will be required to return to the CRA approximately $100,000.00 per year to the CRA. It is unclear whether this "significant" increase would affect City staff's recommendation if the County requested an exemption in future years. There is also no reason to expect an exemption would be granted if the District received only grant money in addition to its tax. B. In Kind Services Performed by CRA In order for this option to be viable, the CRA would need to expand its powers to include Mosquito Control. The District and the CRA would need to enter into an agreement that identifies projects that are acceptable to the District. This issue of agreeing on projects is important. In one of the CRA Board meetings, a City staff member suggested a project as an example of an in-kind service that would, in the opinion of the Mosquito Control Director, actually increase the mosquito population. In addition to the options suggested by City staff, the County also has the option of appealing the decision of the City Commission to deny the requested exemption. The option would require the County Attorney to file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Circuit Court on or before February 5, 2002. The County's substantive argument would be that the District's only guaranteed source of revenue is ad valorem taxes as outlined in the County Administrator's June 28, 2001 letter. The Court would have to decide whether state grant laid funding constitutes an "available source of revenue" pursuant to Section 163.387(c)(2), Florida Statutes. The County may also have a procedural argument in that the City failed to process the County's request within 120 days as required by state law. '-' ~" RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff requests direction from the Board as to how to proceed. -....I ...." Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney H:\MEMOS\02-138.wpd