Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 06-04-02
'-" ,.." J JUNE 4, 2002 7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COìvlIvIISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GÐ\E~-\L RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: C01\'5E:\T .-'\GENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGl"L-\R AGENDA ITEMS· Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests arc items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agcnclé\. PUBLIC HE-'\RINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 AM., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 AM. or é\S soon thereé\fter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone \\1shing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutèS. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (..J,) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRES5I\'G THE COtlJl\HSSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NO\'-AGE\'DA ITBIS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC CO\I'dENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please lnnit comments to five minutes. DECORUÎ\I- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETl\'GS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 AM., unless otherwise advertised. l\leetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is pro\1ded of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-'" -..,I www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA June 4, 2002 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE the "Star Spangled Banner" performed by Lincoln Park Academy Chams 1. MINUTES . Approve the minutes of the meeting held l\Iay 28, 2002. 2. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESE:\TATIO\'S There are no proclamations or presentations scheduled for June 4, 2002. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA AfJp('(JlfceJ LVI ~j} ( 0/ ª/-tV ~ ,Rc'liB! :~U.~.~iIU¡;(1·~ PUBLIC HEARINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /t;~ 0 SA. Resolution No. 02-049jOuasi- Tudicial j BIRNBAUM Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks, and a ,,'aiver from the requirements of Section 8.00.05(",\) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - Fencing Requirements. Location: 33Öï Eventide Place NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. An)' person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boarö at these meetings will need a record ofthe proceedmgs and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any party to the proceedinos, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted t'he opportunity to cross-examine any indiVIdual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meetin~ should contact the-St. Lucie County Community Senices Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-14_8 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' -..,I REGULAR AGENDA JUNE 4, 2002 PAGE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (COI\TI\'UEDl /' D / j' . 5B. Ordinance No. 02 -0 14/0uasi-ludicial / - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance amending the Coastal Management Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan and grant approval for transmittal of the ordinance to the Department of Community Affairs. End of Public Hearings ¡ .....- .... · ,."." {-erm' K:. <!µJJh· :if 6. PUBLIC WORKS .j Sur r ïh (e J f:+oAð/Ju; l ,o,a : Multi Way Stop Study at Citrus Av:nue ~nI~nt; Gar~~ Ø1n~ ~~ Mea~~e~~~;t -f () goc Control Speeding - Staff requests that the board consider whether or not to install.---.-- (d a Multi Way Stop at Citrus A\'enue and Country Garden Lane and provide direction ~ ,lUce, D as to whether to proceed ,\ith implementing a Traffic Calming Program for St. Lucie County. l. ~/o Agri-Science Education Center - Consider staff recommendation to approve the revised Interlocal Agreement \\ith the St. Lucie County School Board, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. COUNTY ATTORNEY 8. PURCHASING ~. 0 V / Bid No. 02-066/ Widening of the Shou der of Orange Avenue from Kings Highway to the County Line - Consider staff recommendation to award the Bid to the low bidder, Dickerson Florida, Inc., in the amount of $1,861,582, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. Sfctf~ +0 0\Qe-1 u.:)lr\-h reó'ld~f~ -to ote,~ Ex fY\~ f\º- e Xé\C+ IOCCl_ti'UtlSO+' "51 f) I\S· W;, 0 10 , ~..O 6r\.c ~.t. ßO it ,J. vn ·h r-.ß l'\; Jt; , '-' ~ CONSENT AGENDA Tune 4. 2002 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No.3 5 2. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-065 / Sunrise Boulevard at Merritt Ditch 60" R.C.P. Culvert Replacement -- Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Sunshine Land Design, in the amount of $12-l,606.99, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Bid No. 02-060 / Rental of Construction and Industrial Equipment - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the suppliers listed and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreements as prepared by the County Attorney. 3. PUBLIC WORKS A. Midway Road Corridor Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Local Agency Participation (LAP) Agreement, adopt Resolution No. 02- 136 authorizing the Chairman to sign the agreement, grant permission to advertise for Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the PD&E Study, and authorize the Chairman to sign the Federal Aid Project Funding Request. B. Bluefield Road Culvert Replacement Project Consider staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign Change Order No.1 in the amount of $(800.00), resulting in a total contract amount of $247,950, accept the project; release retainage, and make Final Payment to Johnson-Davis in the amount of $24,075. -1. HU!\L~ RESOURCES A. Increase in Premiums for Health Insurance / Allocation of Funds to Employees to Cover Increase - Consider staff recommendation to approve Health Insurance Funding for 2003 as outlined. B. October Increase - Consider staff recommendation to approve the 3% increase effective September 29, 2002 for non-bargaining full time and part time with limited benefits employees, subject to tentative and final approval of the budget. C. Resolution No. 02-139 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the proposed resolution as drafted amending sick leave and vacation leave including a shared sick leave policy. ). COUNTY ATTORNEY St. Lucie Oaks / 24 Feet of Road Right-of-Way / Resolution No. 02-137 - Consider staff recommendation to accept the Warranty Deed, authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution, and direct staff to record the Warranty Deed and Resolution No. 02-137 in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. '-'" CONSENT AGENDA JUNE 4, 2002 PAGE TWO ....., 6. PARKS AND RECREATION Amendment to September 8, 1987 Easement bet\\'een County and City of Fort Pierce / Lawnwood Tennis Courts - Consider staff recommendation to approve the i\mendment to Easement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment to Easement. ï. AGRICULTURE Resolution No. 02-162 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution endorsing the efforts of the State of Florida Department of Agriculture and expressing the approval of this Board in the necessary removal of citrus canker in the State of Florida. '" '..."I St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Announcements June 4, 2002 A. There will be a Joint Meeting ,\ith the Board of County Commissioners, the City of Port St. Lucie and the City of Fort Pierce on June 6, 2002 at 2:00 pm in the Commission Chambers to discuss Transit. B. The June 11, 2002 Board of County Commissioners Meeting has been cancelled. C. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Parks Master Plan Workshop on July 1, 2002 at 2:30 PH in the Commission Chambers. D. The 2002/2003 Budget Oveniew ,\ill be held on July 9, 2002 at 2:00 pm in Room 101. E. The August 6, 2002 Board of County Commissioners Meeting has been cancelled. '-" '-' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA June 4, 2002 CONSENT AGENDA County Attorney C-A.1 Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise Ordinance No. 02-21 Amending Section 1-2-16 (Terminal Incentive Pay for Accumulated and Unused Sick Leave) on June 18,2002 at 7:00 pm, or as soon thereafter as possible. Central Services C-A.2 Cancellation of Burns International Contract No. 00-10-200 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the cancellation of the contract with 30 days written notice. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuðls testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the SL Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least lorty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. i "" ....", JUNE 4,2002 7:00 PNI BOARD OF COUNTY COT\1T\1ISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CO:--;SENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There \\ill be no separate discussion of these items unles~ a Commissioner so requests. REGl'LAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presenëations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission \\ill discus;;: individually usually in the order listed on the é\gencla. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public heé.J.'ing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designatio:1s are intended to indicate that an item \\ill not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman ,,,ill open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come fOl\\'ard, one at 2. time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. ' ,-\s a general rule, when issues are scheduled before t1Je Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) CO'.lnty staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please hê.ye eight copies ready for distribution. \'O\'-AGENDA ITEilIS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PL'BLIC COl\Iì\IENT- Time is allotted at the beginning cÏ each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. )IEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public 2nd are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 AM., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras ,-'\dministration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce. FL 34982. The Board schedules additional \\wkshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is pro\ided of these workshops. Anyone \\1th a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. , '-'" . -..."tI W\vw.stlucieco.go\· John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA June 4, 2002 7:00 P.ll/I. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE the "Star spangled Banner" performed by Lincoln Park Academy Chorus 1. MINUTES . Approve the minutes of the meeting held ~lay 28, 2002. 2. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIO:--lS There are no proclamations or presentations scheduled for June 4, 2002. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA ~_m:,"""'¡_~·'_m_á*~~~ ~íl'i .>_.Jj~i1I" PUBUC HEARINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SA. Resolution No. 02-049/0uasi- Tudicial / BIRNBAUM Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks, and a waiver from the requirements of Section 8.00.05(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - Fencing Requirements. Location: 3307 Eventide Place NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boarll at these meetings will need a record of the proceedmgs and for such purpose may neeil to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any parry to the proceedings will be granted tne opportunity to cross-examine any indivIdual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDn (561) 462-1418 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ./ ,-". ...." REGULAR AGENDA JUNE 4, 2002 PAGE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) COlvIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) SB. Ordinance No. 02-0l4/0uasi' Tudicial / - Consider staffrecommendatiol} to approve the ordinance amending the Coastal Management Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan and grant approval for transmittal of the ordinance to the Department of Community Affairs. End of Public Hearings f£l\:(~f.T ¡gm 1\i~,1I11. :w:; ..'111I' ¡If{'¡r lJIIII I'" 1 6. PUBLIC WORKS Multi Way Stop Study at Citrus Avenue and Country Garden Lane and Measures to Control Speeding - Staff requests that the board consider whether or not to install a Multi Way Stop at Citrus Avenue and Country Garden Lane and provide direction as to whether to proceed with implementing a Traffic Calming Program for St. Lucie County. I. COUNTY ATTORNEY Agri-Science Education Center - Consider staff recommendation to approve the revised Interlocal Agreement with the St. Lucie County School Board, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. 8. PURCHASING Bid No. 02-066/ Widening of the Shoulder of Orange Avenue from Kings Highway to the County Line - Consider staff recommendation to award the Bid to the low bidder, Dickerson Florida, Inc., in the amount of $1,861,582. and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. ¡ ~ ..., CONSENT AGENDA Tune 4. 2002 I. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No.3 5 2. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-065 / Sunrise Boulevard at Merritt Ditch 60" R.C.P. Culvert Replacement - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the low bidder, Sunshine Land Design, in the amount of $124,606.99, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Bid No. 02-060 / Rental of Construction and Industrial Equipment - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the suppliers listed and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreements as prepared by the County Attorney. 3. PUBLlCWORKS A. Midway Road Corridor Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Local Agency Participation (LAP) Agreement, adopt Resolution No. 02- 136 authorizing the Chairman to sign the agreement, grant permission to advertise for Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the PD&E Study, and authorize the Chairman to sign the Federal Aid Project Funding Request. B. Bluefield Road Culvert Replacement Project Consider staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign Change Order No.1 in the amount of $(800.00), resulting in a total contract amount of $247,950, accept the project; release retain age, and make Final Payment to Johnson-Davis in the amount of $24,075. 4. HŒIAN RESOURCES A. Increase in Premiums for Health Insurance / Allocation of Funds to Employees to Cover Increase - Consider staff recommendation to approve Health Insurance Funding for 2003 as outlined. B. October Increase - Consider staff recommendation to approve the 3% increase effective September 29,2002 for non-bargaining full time and part time with limited benefits employees, subject to tentative and final approval of the budget. C. Resolution No. 02-139 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the proposed resolution as drafted amending sick leave and vacation leave including a shared sick leave policy. S. COUNTY ATTORNEY St. Lucie Oaks / 24 Feet of Road Right-of-Way / Resolution No. 02-137 - Consider staff recommendation to accept the Warranty Deed, authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution, and direct staff to record the Warranty Deed and Resolution No. 02-137 in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. ........ CONSENT AGENDA JUNE 4, 2002 PAGE TWO ,..." 6. PARKS AL'ID RECREATION Amendment to September 8, 1987 Easement between County and City of Fort Pierce / Lawnwood Tennis Courts - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Amendment to Easement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment to Easement. ï. AGRICULTURE Resolution No. 02-162 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution endorsing the efforts of the State of Florida Department of Agriculture and expressing the approval of this Board in the necessary removal of citrus canker in the State of Florida. "'" ....." St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Announcements June 4, 2002 A. There ì\ill be a Joint Meeting v'lith the Board of County Commissioners, the City of Port St. Lucie and the City of Fort Pierce on June 6, 2002 at 2:00 pm in the Commission Chambers to discuss Transit. B. The June 11, 2002 Board of County Commissioners Meeting has been cancelled. C. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Parks Master Plan Workshop on July 1, 2002 at 2:30 P~I, in the Commission Chambers. D. The 2002/2003 Budget Overvie~w \\ill be held on July 9, 2002 at 2:00 pm in Room 101. . E. The August 6, 2002 Board of County Commissioners Meeting has been cancelled. ~ AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO.~.l REVISED Additions Date: June 4, 2002 Regular [ ] Public Hearing [ ] Consent [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Permission to Advertise Ordinance No. 02-21 - Amending Section 1-2-16 (Terminal Incentive Pay for Accumulated and Unused Sick Leave) BACKGROUND: See C.A. No. 02-813 FUNDS A V AIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests permission to advertise proposed Ordinance No. 02-21 for public hearing on June 18,2002, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as may be heard. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: - . []J APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: c¡¿,~ Douglas M. Anderson 4rn-. County Administrator County Attoroey' 1L Coordination/Shmatur es Mgt & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance (Check for Copy only, if applicable): '" -...I \. INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 02-813 DATE: May 30,2002 SUBJECT: Permission to Advertise Ordinance No. 02-21 - Amending Section 1-2-16 (Terminal Incentive Pay for Accumulated and Unused Sick Leave) BACKGROUND: Section 1-2-16 (Terminal Incentive Pay for Accumulated and Unused Sick Leave) of the Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws establishes a program under which employees with ten or more years of creditable county employment who leave county employment in good standing will receive compensation equal to their accumulated and unused sick leave up to a maximum of sixty (60) days. The ten (10) years requirement was based upon the ten (l0) years employment previously required to vest in the Florida Retirement System. In 2000, this vesting period was lowered to six (6) years. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of proposed Ordinance No. 02-21 which would amend Section 1-2-16 to reflect the change in the vesting requirement for the Florida Retirement System. Under the proposed ordinance, an employee with six (6) or more but less than ten (l 0) years of creditable county employment would be eligible for up to a maximum of thirty (30) days of terminal incentive pay upon termination of employment in good standing. Employees with ten (l0) or more years of creditable county employment would be eligible for up to a maximum of sixty (60) days of terminal incentive pay upon termination of employment in good standing. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff requests permission to advertise proposed Ordinance No. 02-21 for public hearing on June 18,2002 at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as may be heard. Respectfully submitted I~h Heather Young Assistant County Attorney Attachment HY/ 1 '" ~ Copies To: Concurring Staff Clerk Secretary Press Public 2 '- ""'" ORDINANCE NO. 02-21 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1-2-16 (TERMINAL INCENTIVE PAY OF ACCUMULATED AND UNUSED SICK LEAVE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND COMPILED LAWS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO AMEND SUBSECTION 1- 2-16 TO DELETE THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY PORT AND AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND AMEND THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED YEARS OF CREDITABLE COUNTY EMPLOYMENT FOR TERMINAL INCENTIVE PAY OF ACCUMULATED AND UNUSED SICK LEAVE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; ADOPTION; AND CODIFICATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Section 1-2-16 (Terminal incentive pay for the accumulated and unused sick leave) of the Code of Ordinances and Compiles Laws of St. Lucie County, Florida, provides for employees who leave County employment in good standing after ten (10) years of creditable county employment to receive terminal incentive pay for accumulated and unused sick leave. 2. Section 1-2-16(a) includes employees of the St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority in the definition of "county employees of St. Lucie County". 3. The St. County Port and Airport Authority was abolished by the Florida Legislature pursuant to Chapter 98-497, Laws of Florida. 4. The ten (10) year service requirement set forth in Section 1-2-16(f) was intended to correspond to the vesting period requirement under the Florida Retirement System. 5. The 2000 Florida Legislature lowered the vesting period under the Florida Retirement System to from ten (10) years to six (6) years. 6. It is appropriate to amend Section 1-2-16 to delete the reference to the St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority and lower the required period of credible county employment from ten (10) years to six (6) years. '-" ..." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAII'tI"ED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 1-2-16 (TERMINAL INCENTIVE PAY FOR ACCUMULATED AND UNUSED SICK LEAVE) OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES AND COMPILED LAWS Section 1-2-16 (Terminal incentive pay for accumulated and unused sick leave) of the Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County, Florida, is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 1-2-16. Terminal incentive pay for accumulated and unused sick leave. (a) The term "county employees of St. Lucie County" as used in this section shall include all employees of the following: (1) Board of County Commissioners; (2) St. LtlCÍG Count, Port and Airport Authörity, ffl ill St. Lucie County Erosion District; t4J ill St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District. (b) All county employees of St. Lucie County shall be entitled to terminal incentive pay for accumulated and unused sick leave to each employee upon normal or regular retirement or termination of employment after U-n (10) six (6) years creditable county employment, or for other reasons other than disability, and to his beneficiary if service is terminated by death, after ten ftB1 six (6) years of creditable county employment. ( c) The employing agency shall maintain accurate and reliable records showing the amount of sick leave which has accumulated and is unused by the employee at the time of his retirement, death or termination. (d) The payment authorized by this section shall be detérmined by using the rate of pay received by the employee at the time of his retirement, termination or death applied to the sick leave time for which he is qualified to receive terminal "incentive" pay under this section; provided, however, terminal pay allowable for unused sick leave shall not exceed a maximum of sixty (60) days for emplovees with ten (0) or more years of creditable county employment and thirtv (30) davs for employees with six or more but less than ten (10) vears of creditable county employment. (e) The payments made pursuant to this section shall not be considered in any state administered retirement system as salary payments and shall not be 2 PART B. '" """"'" used in determining the average final compensation of an employee in any state administered retirement system. (f) Any employee who is found guilty in a court of competent jurisdiction of committing, aiding or abetting any embezzlement or theft from his employer or bribery in connection employment committed prior to retirement or ten (10 )(,11:11\ nö1111al creditable termination as provided in Subsection 1-2-16(b), whose employment is terminated by reason of his admitted committing, aiding or abetting of an embezzlement or theft from his employer or by reason of bribery for cause, who, prior to ten (10) )CaIS nOI.maI creditable termination or retirement termination as provided in Subsection 1-2-16(b), is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to have violated any state law against strikes by public employees shall forfeit all rights and benefits under this section. Any employee whose employment terminates as a result of an act committed subject to this section or for cause will not be given credit for unused sick leave accumulated prior to termination should he be reemployed at a later date. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, and adopted prior to January I, 1969, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not ·affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect on October I, 2002. 3 ~ "'" PART F. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX Vice Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX Connnissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Connnissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Connnissioner John D. Bruhn XXX PART G. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through G shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this XX day of XX, 2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCm COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS BY: County Attorney 4 '-' "1:EM NO. Q--A~ DATE: June 4.2002 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: (XX) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~TED BY: ~~,Ji Roger hmn Central Services Director SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Central Services SUBJECT: Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners approve the cancellation of Burns International Contract #00-10-200, with 30 days written notice. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County and Burns International entered into a contract on October 24, 2000. The contract was for Burns International to provide security guard services for St. Lucie County. This contract is due to expire November 1,2002. On May 14,2002, the Board of County Commissioners approved a part-time in- house security guard position. Therefore, staff is requesting the cancellation of Contract 00-10-200. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: NA RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the cancellation of Burns International Contract #00-10-200, with 30 days written notice. COMMISSION ACTION: t""""""'I 'I APPROVED 0 DENIED o OTHER: CONCllRBENCE: (/~~ A... Douglas Anderson ~ rCounty Administrator o CoU"ly A_"" Jà/ o Originating Dept&W- Review and ADDrovals o Management and Budget: 'vitO fl/1Il1~ 0 Purchasing: o Other: 0 Other: u! .tÇ: o Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Com munity SeTVices Manager at 561-462-1777 or TTD 561-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting. '-" ...J Commission Review: June 4, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: May 29,2002 Subject: Petition of Allan and Lori Birnbaum, for a Variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks, and a waiver from the requirements of Section 8.00.05(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - Fencing Requirements around pools. LOCATION: 3307 Eventide Place ZONING DISTRICT: RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) FUTURE LAND USE: RU (Residential Urban) PARCEL SIZE: 0.80 acre SURROUNDING ZONING: RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for Eventide Place is 60 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. STANDARDS OF REVIEW Dr. and Mrs. Birnbaum have requested relief from two separate prOVISions of the Land Development Code. They are being presented as one petition, but for the purpose of the hearing and discussion, are being presented separately within this report. In reviewing this application for a variance and a waiver to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Board of County Commissioners will consider and make the following determinations: '-" ..."J May 29. 2002 Page 2 Subject: and Lorie Birnbaum File No.: SLR-02-001 Request #1: Variance from the Provisions of Section 6.02.02(8)(2)(a)(2). of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks. to allow for the construction of a fence within 75 feet of the Mean HiQh Water line of the St. Lucie River. 1. The variance requested arises from conditions that are unique and peculiar to the land, structures, and buildings involved; that the particular physical surroundings, the shape, or topographical condition of the specific property involved would result in unnecessary hardship for the owner, lessee, or occupant, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the Provisions of Section 6.02.02(8)(2)(a)(2), are literally enforced; that they are conditions that are not ordinarily found in the same Zoning District, and the conditions are created by the regulations of Section 6.02.02(8)(2)(a)(2), of this Code, and not by an action or actions of the property owner or the applicant. The applicants are requesting a variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2) in order to permit the construction of a fence along the north and south property lines of their property located at 3307 Eventide Place. There is an existing 4 foot seawall along the St. Lucie River. The proposed fence along the north and south property lines would be constructed down to the mean high water line (MHWL) and have a deficit of 75 feet of the required setback from the mean high water line. A variance request of 10 feet or more of this 75 foot setback requires a review and determination by the Board of County Commissioners. The provisions of Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a), of the Land Development Code establish setbacks from the shoreline of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River in which development activities are either prohibited or restricted. This section specifies that no development activity that would alter the native vegetation of the shoreline of tributaries of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River shall be permitted within 75 feet of the mean high water line for lots platted after August 1, 1989. The requested variance arises from conditions which are unique to the property involved. The purpose of the 75 foot setback from the mean high water line is to protect any native vegetation located within this setback and along the shoreline. The proposed fence will not result in impacts to native vegetation. The bank of the St. Lucie River in this area has previously been negatively impacted by a concrete block bulkhead and boat dock. There is no native vegetation located within the 75 foot setback area. The granting of this variance would allow the applicants to construct the fence without negatively impacting adjacent properties and meet the spirit of Section 8.00.05, which requires fencing of swimming pools. 2. The granting of this variance will not impair or injure other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the subject property is located. The reduction of the buffer zone has been determined to have no significant impact upon the water quality and shoreline protection needs of the St. Lucie River. The subject property already has a bulkhead and dock on the St. Lucie River and, therefore, no "'" ...., May 29,2002 Page 3 Subject: and Lorie Birnbaum File No.: SLR-02-001 degradation of the shoreline would be expected to occur if the setback is reduced from the current 75 feet to the proposed 0 feet for the fence. A 4 foot seawall exists along the St. Lucie River. 3. The variance is the minimum that will make possible the reasonable use of the land. The requested variance is the minimum variance required in order to allow the fence in the location proposed. 4. The variance will not be opposed to the general spirit and intent of this Code or the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed variance is not opposed to the general spirit and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code or Comprehensive Plan. The variance, if granted, would allow the construction of fence that would closely resemble other fences constructed at homes in the neighborhood. Comments: The applicants are requesting a variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2) in order to permit the construction of a fence along the north and south property lines of their property located at 3307 Eventide Place. There is an existing 4 foot seawall along the St. Lucie River. The proposed fence along the north and south property lines would be constructed down to the mean high water line (MHWL) and have a deficit of 75 feet of the required setback from the mean high water line. A variance request of 10 feet or more of this 75 foot setback requires a review and determination by the Board of County Commissioners. The provisions of Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a), of the Land Development Code establish setbacks from the shoreline of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River in which development activities are either prohibited or restricted. This section specifies that no development activity that would alter the native vegetation of the shoreline of tributaries of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River shall be permitted within 75 feet of the mean high water line for lots platted after August 1, 1989. The requested variance arises from conditions which are unique to the property involved. The purpose of the 75 foot setback from the mean high water line is to protect any native vegetation located within this setback and along the shoreline. The proposed fence will not result in impacts to native vegetation. The bank of the St. Lucie River in this area has previously been negatively impacted by a concrete block bulkhead and boat dock. There is no native vegetation located within the 75 foot setback area. The granting of this variance would allow the applicants to construct the fence without negatively impacting adjacent properties and meet the spirit of Section 8.00.05, which requires fencing of swimming pools. Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in Section 10.01.02, St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in "" ,.." May 29, 2002 Page 4 Subject: and Lorie Birnbaum File No.: SLR-02-001 conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff, therefore, recommends approval of the requested variance. ReQuest #2: Waiver from the reQuirements of Section 8.00.05lA) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - FencinQ ReQuirements around pools. 1. The waiver requested arises from conditions that are unique and peculiar to the land, structures, and buildings involved; that the particular physical surroundings, the shape, or topographical condition of the specific property involved would result in unnecessary hardship for the owner, lessee, or occupant, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, If the Provisions of Section 8.00.05, are literally enforced; that they are conditions that are not ordinarily found In the same Zoning District, and the conditions are created by the regulations of Section 8.00.05, of this Code, and not by an action or actions of the property owner or the applicant. Because Section 8.00.05(A), which addresses waivers from the fencing requirements does not include standards of review, staff has used standards consistent with those of shoreline variances. Dr. and Mrs. Birnbaum are requesting a waiver from Section 8.00.05, Pool Fencing Requirements, which requires that all swimming pools in the unincorporated areas of the county, unless entirely screened in, shall be completely enclosed with a fence or wall at least 4 feet in height and so constructed as to not readily be climbable by small children. The subject property has a 4 foot high seawall along the St. Lucie River and a fence is proposed for the north and south property lines. 2. The granting of this waiver will not Impair or injure other property or improvements in the neighborhood In which the subject property Is located. The applicant has demonstrated that, with the granting of the waiver, it would not endanger the public safety in the neighborhood. The pool would be entirely enclosed by fences and walls of at least 4 feet in height. If extensions are constructed to the fences at the seawall to prevent passage around the end of the fences, the pool will be secure. Such extensions should be a condition of approval. 3. The waiver is the minimum that will make possible the reasonable use of the land. The requested waiver is the minimum needed in order to provide a safe and secure pool area. 4. The waiver will not be opposed to the general spirit and Intent of this Code or the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The requested waiver is not opposed to the general spirit and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. '-" ....., May 29, 2002 Page 5 Subject: and Lorie Birnbaum File No.: SLR-02-001 Comments: Dr. and Mrs. Birnbaum are requesting a waiver from Section 8.00.05, Pool Fencing Requirements, which requires that all swimming pools in the unincorporated areas of the county, unless entirely screened in, shall be completely enclosed with a fence or wall at least 4 feet in height and so constructed as to not readily be climbable by small children. The subject property has a 4 foot high seawall along the St. Lucie River and a fence is proposed for the north and south property lines. Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in Section 10.01.02, St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff, therefore, recommends approval of the requested waiver. Attached is Draft Resolution 02-049, which, if approved, would allow for the construction of a fence within the 75 foot setback of the Mean High Water line and a waiver from the 4 foot fence requirements around pools, specifically along the rear property line, subject to the following conditions: 1. In the event that the proposed fence along the north and south property lines are removed, the owner of the subject property shall be required to provide a fence around the swimming pool meeting the requirements of Section 8.00.05. 2. Extensions shall be added to the proposed fences along the north and south property lines to prevent ready access to the property around the ends of these fences. Ple~se contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. cc: Allan and Lori Birnbaum County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Planning Manager File '-" ...,.I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION 02-049 FILE NO.: SLR~2~01 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6.02.02(B)(2)(A)(2), ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE - ST. LUCIE RIVER SHORELINE SETBACKS AND A WAIVER FROM SECTION 8.00.05(A), FENCING REQUIREMENTS FOR ALLAN AND LORI BIRNBAUM WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Allan and Lori Birnbaum, presented a petition for a variance from the provisions of Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a), St. Lucie County Land Development Code and a waiver from the provisions of Section 8.00.05(A), fencing requirements, for property located at 3307 Eventide Place, along the North Fork of the St. Lucie River. 2. On June 4, 2002, this Board held a public hearing on the petition. after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 3. After consideration of the testimony presented during the June 4, 2002, public hearing, including staff comments and the standards of review for granting variances set out in Section 10.01.30, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Board of County Commissioners has made the following determination: 1. The requested variance, subject to the conditions in Section A below meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 10.01.30 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 2. The variance and waiver granted will not impair other property or improvements in the neighborhood. 3. The variance and waiver granted are the minimum needed to allow the continued use of the fence and meet the requirements for fencing around pools. 4. The variance and waiver granted meet the general spirit and Intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. File No.: SLR-02-001 June 4, 2002 Resolution 02-049 Page 1 ~ ,.." 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The petition for a Variance from the Provisions of Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, St. Lucie River setback standards and a waiver from the provisions of Section 8.00.05{A), submitted by Allan and Lori Bimbaum is granted for the property described below, subject to the following condition: 1. In the event that the fence along the north or south property lines are removed, the owner of the subject property shall be required to provide a fence around the swimming pool meeting the requirements of Section 8.00.05. 2. Extensions shall be added to the fences along the north and south property lines to prevent ready access to the property around the ends of these fences. B. The property on which this variance and waiver are granted is described as follows: EVENTIDE· UNIT ONE, LOT 4. Tax 10#: (4424-807-0006-000/3) (Location: 3307 Eventide Place) C. This variance will allow for a fence within 0 feet of the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River and a waiver from the 4 foot fencing requirements around pools. D. The variance shall not be valid for a period longer than twelve months from the date ofthis Resolution - June 4, 2003 - unless a building permit is issued or an extension is granted After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward xxx Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx File No.: SLR-02-001 June 4, 2002 Resolution 02-049 Page 2 '-' -....I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 4th Day of June 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\WORD\Pelilions\BCC\Finished.02\Bimbaum.RZ\BimbaumRES.doc File No.: SLR-02-001 June 4, 2002 Resolution 02-049 Page 3 '-' E :::::J co ..0 ,- c a l0.- a aJ I C\J l0.- a 0 '" ---1 a: 0 oð ---1 \ I:. (f) , c , co <{ .I ~z (I \of,t' t ~:^_~ :i .~;~: I ~. i y I ~ . o w o o '" :! : ... ... 'l ... .. '" '" ç Z :J ç 0 0 Z :J 0 0'101 ~, )!)HnI 0 a: w I I > ä: z ... Ë ~ :Jl ; a: .. <C I ~ ayOlillJl~ ~ '" Z <C .... ... i5 ~ S K: L S ç. L ... > . .. .. ~ ~ '" },jNnO:J 3380H033)lO A Petition ~lIan and Lori Birnbaum for a Variance from t~~rovisions of Section 6.02.02 and a waiver from Section 8.00.05(A). 45 -0 22A > - IT) f7 Q) :IT :ITA 44A 44 (f) (J OJ :J 4/A -0 /6 ----1 38 0 - CJ1 I.... 40 41 OJ > w Road /5 14 /3 /2 /I /4 /5 /6 2 /6 f7 /5 /4 10 /I I I 4 I 9 8 6 5 31 I I I I 4 5 I I St. Lucie River 2 SLR 02-001 5}TA'~~~~~. Map prepared May 14,2002 ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel Lake of the Estates Britt Rood 6 2 Ths map ha& ~ ~ to' ~pIaming and relerence :lUIpO&ØS only N 'M1IIe tN«'f el'IOI1 has bøøn mad8 Ie prOllide hl ITlOiIt C\.I1enl and acanle lnI'onnatIon pœsll:¡le,IIC!'lOIÍl'IIDndlId bu_ as alegdl binding óocunenl 1 '-' Allan and Lori Birnbaum' Zoning "0 45 > 14 22A - m 7A f7 Q) Jr JrA 44A 44 VJ Ü (!) 15 ~ 41A "0 16 .....J 0 38 - CJ1 L.. 16 Q) 40 4/ > w Road 14 13 2 12 16 f7 /I 15 14 10 /I 1 I I 31 I I I I 1 I 9 8 4 5 St. Lucie River 2 Lake of the Estates Britt Rood 6 2 SLR 02-001 =-~~/1 This pattern indicates ~ subject parcel 5lF.4~~' GI~¡ ......--:>--= Map prepared May 14, 2002 Thia map h88 been compiIec:l !of genaraI pIImlng and (1Iference po:.wpo&e8 tx"#f Whilø ~ effat has been made to pltMc;lII h most curren! a"ld acðII'a18 ilfomlldion P»Gble,lle notirtendlld forUM. alllgaly blr'IcIng dDc:urneIt. "'" Allan and Lori BirnbaurT( Land Use "D 45 > /4 22A - rn ill E EA 44A 44 rn U Q) /5 ::::J 4/A "D 16 ---1 0 J8 Q1 L 16 Q) /5 40 4/ > w Road /4 /J 2 /2 /6 IT Lake af the Estates Britt Road 6 2 SLR 02-001 V//////1 This pattern indicates ~ subject parcel ~ t 5lTL~~)~~~,. ~ Map prepared May 14,2002 j This map has been cornpIed lor ~ ~ng If1d refer8nce p.xposes onty N 'iYtlJ1e fN«Y eflOIt has been made to proWie 1he roost ÇUlTent ¥ld ac:onto informaûol"l possible, it is not nended klr UM .. a legally IJird1g document '-' ...,J Allan and Lori Birnbaum 02-001 5Ø- ~'1øÄ~~~_ GI.S. ~'C>-~ Map prepared May 14,2002 This m&¡:I has bøerl compi~ torgeneralplarrilg ..xl AIf-.nœ purpoGÐI arty. N 'Mlile eNety etfOlt haa bllen mede to pmvióe thlI most cu-rent.-d aca.n1" infOl'lTl8tion possible, I ¡a ntII i'Ilanded lor use 1$ ~ Iega/lr ~ooing document ~ ...." AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, June 4, 2002 7:00 P.M. AllAN AND LORI BIRNBAUM, have petitioned St. Lucie County for a Variance from the provisions of Section 6.02.02 and a Waiver from Section 8.00.05(A) for the following described property: Location: 3307 Eventide Place, Stuart, Florida. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying dUring a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners May 24, 2002. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on May 26, 2002. File No. SLR-02-001 '-' ( ( ...., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR May 24, 2002 In accordance with the 51. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that ALLAN AND WRI BIRNBAUM have petitioned 5t. Lucie County for a Variance from the provisions of Section 6.02.02 and a waiver from Section 8.00.05(A) for the following described property: Location: 3307 Eventide Place, Stuart, Florida. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST The public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on Tuesday, June 4, 2002, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County AdministratWn Building, 2300 Virginia A venue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners should be received by the County Planning Division at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such pwposc, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (561) 462- 1777 or T.D.D. (561) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call 56//462-1582 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number SLR-02-001. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ~~ ~di/f1J Cè::f Doug Coward, Chairman JOHN D. ßRUHN. DIS"ier No 1 . DOUG COWARD. Disrricr NO.2' PAULA A. LEWIS. Dim;cr No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON. Dimicr NO.4' CUFf OARNES. Dimicr No. :> Covnry Adminisrroror - Douglas M. Anderson 2JOO Virginia Avenue . Forr Pierce. FL J4982-5652 Adminisrrarion: (561) 462-1590 . Planning: (561) 462-2822 . GISlTechnical Services: (561) 462-155J Economic Developmenr: (561) 462-1550 . Fax: (561) 462-1581 Tourist/Convenrion: (561) 462-1529 . Fax: (561) 462-21J2 "'" ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARiNG AGENDA June 4. 2002 ..."" TO WHOM IT .MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Seclion 11.00:03 of the St. Lucie County Land Developmenl Code and in accordance with the provisions of Ihe 51. Lucie County Compre- hensive Plan, lhot the. fol- lowing applicant has requested Ihat Ihe 51. Lucie County Board of Commis- sioners consider their.. fol- : lowing request: ALLAN- AND LORI BIRN- BAUM, for a Variance from I the .pravisions of Section ' 6.02.02 and a Waiver from Section a.OO.OS(A) for the following described property: LOT 4, EVENTIDE: UNIT I, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT T H ER E 0 F RECORDED IN PLAT BOOI,( 29~ PAGE'l 1 AND 1 lA, . PÙBlIC RECORDS O~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY. Location: . 3307 Eventide Plate, Stuart, Flarida:' . PUBÚC. HEARIN-GS will be held in Commi$sion Cham_ þers, ROQer. Poi.lros 'AlÌne~ ¡ 3rd Floor, 51. Lucie County . Adlninis.t ration' B. u(ldiri9.·; II 2300 Virginia Avenue; Fort Pierce, Floriqa oil June-4, ! 2002, beginning at 7:00 P,M. ar as soon-thefeafter os .possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.01 05, Florida Statutes, if a person decides 10 appeal ally de<:ision.Înade by a board, agency, or commission with· respect 10 any mailer considered ata meeting of.hearing, he will need a record of. the pro- ceedings,and thaí, for such purþoses,he mciy need to ensure Ihal a verbalim' record of Ihe proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the oppeal is 10 be based. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS . ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ;5; Doug. Co,;",ord. CHAIRMAN Ir~Jlrl·~~· i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~r~! ~ :¡jl! ~ ~ ¡ ¡ i! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i i ~! ~ ~ II tii 0\ T"""I - T"""I M ("'f") 0\ t"") 0\ t (""--. t"") 0\ 0\ 0'\ 0\ 0\ a-, 0\ 0\ 'o::t M M ("f') 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ C""ì 1.1 I v I vi 1'<1'1- v '<I' v v v v v V M V '<I' '<I' v v v ("f') M1 M \0 1M M ("f') ('1") M M ('f') ('f'j ("'f") I ('f'j M ('1j M M M II -+- ". II iHI, f-i, r -t j -[-- - / II I' I I Ii: ' ., :: ¡ 'II I I I 11~1 ,', !! ' ' I I I I I, I '!~i[~L~j~i-~l¡iI¡i¡~~¡ildifi~4~ld¡i ¡i ¡i ¡i ¡ii¡i ¡i ¡iidd¡ii¡i ¡i ¡i , [' I I I ' I I : ' , ! . I ! I I : I l.c~l ) ¡f-r I, II ¡: i i Ii: : I ! : ! §[ ! I ¡ 1 I ¡I; I w .~ ¡i ! ¡~I~I~:. I ¡.,f', 'II i ~¡. : I ¡' I. ~!jjl I j Ii I I 0' O! o! I U ' 1·- 1 ,'f.... _ 1!8:~~!!ll!~III~J¡l!1!H~¡1!lll,;,ill !I:¡l¡l II ;ll~ Ii Ii "i;;ll;;ll;;l! ~ i i :! !:! q i .il11 ij j q I, !i Jn~,~i ~ J i ~ ~Id~ illi'~ii'i ~ ~ j i H j ~ j ~ ~ ~ II ~II ~ ] ] ]/' e5 ~ ~ ~ .2 ~11.2 ~ .2 ,~ e5 1,~ ,~ e5 ~Z [.5 ~ ~ ~ .§ ~ .§ ~ ~ ~ I'.ã z s: s: s: en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;Ien ;; ;; en 0 ~ V5 z ~ en rìï en rìï ~ en ~ I~N???~O o~o~o~oIVOO~~OM~OONM~~~~ <-~~~~~s~=~~~~~f=~~~~~~~=~~~S~S~ II ¡~i I I ~ ! I I ¡~~ ¡ ",I J I i l ) ~I< ~I ,'u1a:l! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '2 ~ .¡: ¡g ,~~ Z 'I~ ë3 ë3 ë3 Å :J:j 03 ë3 I~ ~ ¡ ¡: .! II ji ji i Ii Ii I' Ii II " ii Ii f! II Ii " ii Ii ,I ì! II I, II", i~ I .~ ;;. ¡." ~ 00 c .S .... = e ¡." ~ .s e CJ = .- = .c.c Q. c = ¡." ¡." .- gn~ ~ .- C Z ....;¡ 1:;<:($ ~ c I [~ ~ ~ I ~ .š I~g -æ I 1::1 g i e I 'e ~ lie ~ .1/'2 '3: ! c .~ p~ ~ II~ ª ! fr "; l~::; l"l ~ e = z 8 .¡: .¡: .¡: =' ~.~ Q) 0) .~ ~ 2 I!) <::: of :ë :ë ê .¡: E >- i;d: ro œ as G,) Q) ._ 0 a:la:la:la:la:la:la:la:l ! I I I I ¡::..2 ~Qj 8 .~ a:lU I , M ~ ..c.c.c e Ë']]-];: = Q) fIJ fIJ fIJ 8 Z E-~~~en I I ~ ~ ':; "'0 ..... 0 :!2 :!2 ~ 'Eu .- <::: l ) 0 '" :-: ~¿g~~g~~ Cl<~::I:~~a:l r , I I I ~88 000 000 ~ ~ ~ -00 000 000 N 00 ~ 000 ~ ~ ~ vvv N N N :::¡::::¡::::¡: O~ 00 00 00 ~ M 00 00 00 ~ N 00 00 ~ '<I'v N N v '<I' vv NMOI'-OOMN 0000000 0000000 0000000 v\.Ov.......c- M ooo~ooo 0000000 0000000 00 r- r- N r-IN ~ 0000000 00000000000000 v11v1'<1' vlv v '<I' NNNNNNN :::¡:¡ :::J:_L;43L ;:1 :::J: , :::¡: J.L. '" 'õ 'E «l ¡:>., , ~~ '" ~ ~ ~ o~ N .... o l ) l ) ..... <::: .~ § 'ê ¡¡¡oj .~ ~ Qj '" 8] ~:J <::: «lp :2: ¡;¡ >U ~ Cl § g ;:; Cl ... 0 8 l ) <::: ;:; ,ª.'! ,g ~';; -'" .~ - .- .- ~ -;;; ~ "¡;j 2 l ) l ) ooo~~ I ... 1l ~ ...."¡;j .g, U '" u ~~ <::: ;;;¡...I< ;. <::: l ) 0 ~~ O,l öJJ '" ¡:>., ., Qj "'0 l ) J.L. ¡¡¡ I!) .~ Q) '~'E R ~~:iJ ~::I:..... '" ~ali~š~ ..ce.c"'.... .... 0 l ) U .c .... ""~Cl<U~ Cl ~ '" t:: t:: C ,) ~ l ) 22:E.'! ï:: oo~cn~ ~~<~U ~ 8Qj .~ ~ ::::: U ~~ .... 0 e ~ g ;:; bO ..!:! ,,ª:3,g .<:::_ ~ t ~.~ 2 l1 æ¡¡OOO;":: .... 1l :.= d_";; .~ .g, u l ) '" U ~~~ ~ <::: '" .=:;;;¡ ~ 1:: a ;. Æø:~~ \0'<1'0- 0000 0000 0000 M ~ M MO-O 0000 0000 N{"'"--NOO ~ ~~I~ :::¡: ,:::J:Iï!:::J:__ OOOM\C)("I'1V)O\O\NOO_ONr- gggggggggggggg 00000000000000 NN.-.;t't.r'lt""'l('f')V)O'\-_r-lIiOo.o\ OOOONOOO(",)ONO_O 00000000000000 00000000000000 OONl.()l'-NOOOONNNNlIìNOO 000000000..-,0000 oooooooooooooooooo-.::;roooooooo vvvvvvvvvvvvvv NNNNNNNNNNNNNN :::J::::J::::J::::J::::J::::¡: ~I~:::¡::::J::::J::::J::::¡::::¡: ¡r=-,,-- . -C--~----'__I II g Ii -"''1';T;T:l ~ I I III ~II c,11r;~I~I~I~III~ ~'~ . ::l1.IN¡ ~I~!~I~ ~ ~ ~ 'Ii l~~.~t~+~:~~~. ,i :¡ II : I ! , i i Ii II "~'I ' I! I I ;¡ ',I !iÆJEIi...,¡i....l ....l1~11))....l i , ,,"'-' I ~ I ~ I ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ II if I¡I-¡--"r- ¡ . 1--1 II. 1.: .¡I Ii! I'! ¡ ;. ¡ [ I ¡ il'¡ii Ii èli ~ i ~ ¡ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ t= :1 , ... liE I E I' EEl E E 12 I I! ¡,_u I _00 J,. 00 l.~ CIJ: 'l) en en . Ii r 1i .! ! I Ii U ;;..; n !j : l I: 1j !, ¡ !l i; H ii '" ~ C, I't ~ rJJ C o ... .... el ë J. .s ~ 8 .:: = .c el c,..c el C .., .= gn= ~ ... íJ ~ .¡..;¡ ë~ ~ ë ; c,- 0- --< ~ J,., Qì .s Ci..... èO ... 0 C I = g ë I ë ~ o ¡..;¡ U~ ,~ = = .~ I Qì ¡..;¡ e 0.11 I ~ ~ !I fr el II Ci :.E ~_m._ J]: ' ; : ¡ ~ j !i ¡1_1 ¡ !i ll~¡jl~ Ii il]i·~I., II : II ãì I g I a I! aJ il':';I....lI~ It J..' ¡..o..; _I Ii "0 I _I UlI Ul H~"O 1'1;;:; I õl;::: : .....",.'iM ~I- I , ¡-----r . 1. ¡I j I II~II [ I I I' J I aJ I I . Ie'.... I I., ¡ el ::: Z ~ I! . II~,I~ I· aJ ~ ë ~ el ..c: ~~ u ., l"l .~ aJ~:;E 8 .-., el .- > = Zolol= "0< I II ...,¡ c ¡: ....l " 'G ~ ~ ~II .3 ~ e 1:: I! o 0 01' C ...t:: ..c ..cd .;; Ul Ul UlI: rJ) Ul Ul UlI § § = =¡ ¡:l.., ~ ~I ~ ~i o "'I ~" i. il 'I i I N ..... o N ., âf ¡:l.., ¡:.;;¡ '<IJ ~ " õ 'r;; ._ oj '" ~~ ......::I:::I: ::; .S .!! ~ "t:: ~ ~ 13 o -0 ;:l ;:l O¡¡¡....l....l :.;;¡ <IJ ..c: ~ () " c; ~ <IJ E·~ ~ <IJ - g¡.-.- ~~~~~ ..1<1 ..... :;l aJ "S 8 ol ~ el ..c: <¡:¡ Z U·_ 1f-'---1.~ t' I II II I'r-- 0\ 00 e---Ie--- '<I'i_ I II i ~ gO! 0 0 0 I ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ¡~ ~ ~ ¡ 00000001 S £ ~ ~1~1~ ~N~ N~I ;1 ~ 'V I 'V 'V '<I' 'V ~ ~ II,el r"¡N N ~I~ Ili:'..J _;I ~~,1;i .: '<t I :'T L ~ IJJ ~ ~ ..., Agenda Request Item Number Date: SA 06/04/02 Consent Regular Public Hearing ego [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] Quasi-JD [ X ] SUBJECT: irector Consider Draft Resolution 02-049 granting a Variance f Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks, and a waiver from the requirements of Section 8.00.05(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - Fencing Requirements for property located at 3307 Eventide Place. To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: Petition of Allan and Lori Bimbaum, for a Variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks. to allow for the construction of a fence within 75 feet of the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River, and a waiver from the requirements of Section 8.00.05(A) of the St. Lucie County land Development Code - to grant a waiver from the 4 foot fencing requirements around swimming pools. (File No.: SLR-02-001) FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 02-049. r-¥ï COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED U DENIED D OTHER 5-0 County Attorney Originating Depl: Finance: Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: ríZ~ Douglas M. Anderson ~,. County Administrator Purchasing: Other; ~ '-" ,.."" Agenda Request Item Number Date: _58_ 06104/02 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [Xl [ [ l [Xl Quasi-JD [ l SUBJECT: Consider authorizing the transmittal of the Proposed Amendment to the Coastal Management Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan to incorpora e the Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan to the Department of community Affairs for further agency review. To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners in cooperation with the City of Fort Pierce has prepared the Porf of FOlt Pierce Master Plan for incorporation into the Coastal Management Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: At the May 16, 2002, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 2, with Mr. Merritt and Mr. Lounds voting against, and with two members (Mr. Matthes and Mr. Trias) absent, recommended that the Board of County Commissioners adopt Draft Ordinance 02-014 amending the Coastal Management Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends transmittal of the amended Coastal Management Element to the Department of Community Affairs. .--K-, COMMISSION ACTION: L.::::J APPROVED D DENIED o OTHER 5-0 rA~ A- Douglas M. Anderson n · ""-county Administrator County Attorney Originating Depl.: Rnance: Coordination! Signatures Mg!. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: ,.... '-' COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: 06/04/02 File Nmnber ORD-02-014 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Community Development Director DATE: May 28, 2002 SUBJECT: Petition of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to incorporate the Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan into the Coastal Management Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. St. Lucie County is the local government entity responsible for the overall management of the Port ofFt Pierce and as such is required by Section 163.3178, Florida Statutes to prepare a port master plan for incorporation into the Coastal Management Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 1be proposed lllrend1œnt will fulfill State requirements and St. Lucie County Coastal Management Goal 7.5 that directs the County to develop a new Master Plan for the Port of Fort Pierce to replace the existing 1989 Port Master Plan. The new Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan (Port Master Plan) more clearly defines the comnrunity vision, strengthens local control over the process, and provides flexibility to ensure intergovernmental coordination and the desired mix of uses. The Port Master Plan was developed through a series of intergovernmental and public workshops and meetings over a period of several years. The final version was generated following a February 19,2002 joint workshop of the Board of County Commissioners and the Fort Pierce City Commission that was held for the purpose of reviewing the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Port Master Plan. Based upon the comments presented at that meeting, and the March 12, 2002 of the Board of County Commissioners, this final draft of the Port Master Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies is proposed for your consideration. 1be Master Plan does not include detailed site layouts for the Port Area nor does it address specific future land use and zoning matters that are under the purview of the City of Fort Pierce. hnplexœntation of the proposed Port Master Plan Goals, Objectives and Polices will occur through the Board of the County Commissioners management of the Port and the City of Fort Pierce's land development regulations. The Port Master Plan identifies two geograplùc areas. The Port Operations Area and the Port Planning Area. The Port Planning Area was identified as the area potentially affected by Port "-" ..J May 28, 2002 Page 2 Petition: Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan Coastal Management Element Amendment Operations. The Port Operations Area is comprised of the upland and adjacent waters that are the focus of existing and future Port development. The data and analysis section of the plan identifies and evaluates lands and waters within the Port Planning Area and the Port Operations Area. *********************************** COMMENTS The proposed Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan represents a revised vision for the Port of Fort Pierce, that has evolved through public referendums and a charrette process, which shifts the general uses from exclusively cargo as per the 1989 Port Master Plan to a mix of recreations, commercial, and industrial uses. The revised Goals, Objectives and Policies are proposed to replace Goal 7.5 and subsequent objectives and policies under this Goal, which are addressed by the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the new Port Master Plan. The Data and Analysis section is provided as documentation to support the Port Master Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies and is not proposed for adoption. The Port Master PIan is provided for your review. Please note that consistent with the recent revision of the County's Comprehensive Plan, only the Goals, Objectives and Policies are proposed for adoption. The language in the Goals, Objectives and Policies has been developed and agreed upon by the County and the City of Fort Pierce. The Local Planning Agency has detennined the following: a.) This is consistent with state, regional and local plans; b.) That the adoption of the pIan amendment will not adversely affect the public interest, health, safety, and general welfare; c.) That the petition is consistent with the specific goals, objectives and policies governing the proposed plan amendment; and, d.) That the County's plan amendment review standards have been met. The Local Planning Agency made this detennination based on findings contained in the attached LP A staff report. Staff reconnnends that the Board find that the Port Master Plan meets items a - d above and authorize the transmission of the amended Coastal Management Element to the Department of Community Affairs for review. Attachments cc: File '-" ...., " "",","~",'n!""';¡n~1 ~,' '.,~,~!~~7~ tt~~j:~[1.ø ~ 7.~"'t~.It'" .~_ : ~n'_ :i't".l ?l'rr.': ;"::: (_",<:,~-,,!''.< i'\ :~-;}~'n') ~ l AGENDA ITEM 11: ORDINANCE 02-014 _ Amend Coastal Manae:ement Eiê~~~t·~t'; ¡". ,"" <.l Comp Plan to Incorporate Port of Ft. Pierce Master Plan: Mr. David Kelly stated that Agenda Item # 11 was Ordinance No. 02-014 for an amendment to the Coastal Management Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan. He continued that the proposed amendment would fulfill State requirements and the St. Lucie County Coastal Management Goal7.5 that directs the County to develop a new Master Plan for the Port of Fort Pierce. He also stated that the plan would be incorporated into the Coastal Management Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan as required by Section 163.3178, Florida Statutes since St. Lucie County is the local government entity responsible for the overall management of the Port of Fort Pierce. He also explained that the information provided to the Local Planning Agency was the Data and Analysis and the Goals, Objectives and PolicJes for the Plan and was generated following a February 19, 2002 joint workshop of the Board of County Commissioners and the Fort Pierce City Council. He stated that based on comments presented at that meeting, and the March 12,2002 meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, this final draft of the Port Master Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies is proposed for your consideration. Mr. Kelly explained that before any proposed amendment is transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs for approval, the Local Planning Agency and the Board of County Commissioners must determine the plan's consistency with state, regional and local plans; that the adoption of the plan amendment will not adversely affect the public interest, health, safety, and general welfare; that the petition is consistent with the specific goals, objectives and policies governing the proposed amendment; and that the County's plan amendment review standards have been met. Mr. Lounds asked Staff who wrote the Port Master Plan. Mr. Kelly stated that the author was the FAUIFIU Joint Center for Environmental and Urban Problems. Mr. Lounds stated that he felt the information provided was not very clear or easy to read. Mr. Grande asked if only the Goals, Objectives and Policies were under review by them. Mr. Kelly stated that the review is of both sections, but as with the Comp Plan, the intention is to adopt only the Goals, Objectives and Policies. He continued that the Local Planning Agency's action would be to make a recommendation on the Goals, Objectives and Policies. Mr. Grande stated he was concerned about the information included in the Executive Summary from the consultant and that he didn't believe that was official information and would not be included in the voting and modification process. Mr. Kelly stated that the LPA could make any recommendations they would like within the document but the ultimate goal was with regards to the Goals, Objectives and Policies. He also stated that the Executive Summary was there to give a brief synopsis of what the Plan included. Mr. Hearn stated that the document was the result of four meetings between both sides of the cargo port issue. He also stated that final report is not perfect because it doesn't totally reflect the public perception of how they want the waterfront in Fort Pierce developed but it is ahead of the 1989 Port Master Plan. Mr. Hearn asked if the wording is the exact wording that the Board of County Commissioners approved. Mr. Kelly stated that was correct. Mr. Hearn stated that the community has an opportunity to bring a minimum of four hundred jobs to the waterfront with the mega yacht industry. He continued that the type of people that will attract will increase land values in the community and in his opinion, will be the biggest economic benefit the community P & Z Meeting May 16,2002 Page 13 ~ -..J' .' .,~." ~ " ~.~, 1:'+ '~".<J,- ~ :::\L'1~rb::" has ever had. -;':'1. Tß "..J ~¡ IflNlNG CÜf.IE;~'¡~:'~t3r:N j7!~rPt1ßV At Mr. Merritt stated that Page 2 of the Staff report, under comments, says that the Data and Analysis section is provided as documentation to support the Port Master Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies and are not proposed for adoption and he requested clarification of that statement. Mr. Kelly stated that the Goals, Objectives and Policies are what are being proposed for adoption and the rest of the material was for their information in order to assess the GOP's. Mr. Merritt questioned who determines if the amendment furthers the public interest, health, safety and general welfare. Mr. Kelly stated that on this issue it would be the Local Planning Agency. Mr. Merritt then stated that on the same page, letter b was too vague. He also stated that he had a problem with putting all of the degradation of the Indian River Lagoon on the Port as stated on page 4, Policy 7.5.1.3. He continued that he did not care for the wording of that entire paragraph. Mr. Grande stated that the sections that Mr. Merritt was going over were relating to the GOP's that are not part of the Port Plan and are parts of existing parts of the Comprehensive Plan. He continued that he didn't believe they were part of this discussion and they were included in the document to demonstrate that the Port Plan itself is consistent with the rest of the Comprehensive Plan. He also stated that those items have already been approved and adopted and are outside of the scope of this meeting. Mr. Merritt questioned who approved and adopted that information. Mr. Grande stated that he believed it came before them previously and that the information is really only included to demonstrate to the LPA that the information regarding Port Plan, which is located after the Staff report in the packet, and is consistent with the GOP's in the existing Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Kelly stated that was correct and they provided the information to demonstrate consistency with all of the previously approved State, Regional and Local Plans. Mr. 'Merritt stated that agreed with Mr. Lounds and felt the information was confusing. He also stated that he did not feel that he could make an informed decision tonight because of the way he felt the information was presented. Mr. Grande stated that the areas of the Port Plan are what they should be reviewing tonight. He continued that the Goals, Objectives. and Policies are in Part 2 of the Draft Port Plan and run from page 23 through page 44 and that is what they are being asked to review. Mr. Merritt stated again that he reviewed the information and really did not feel the information was clear. Mr. Hearn stated that this process has been ongoing for the last five to six years, at the minimum, and that he has been actively involved in it and can state, without reservation, that this plan is a compromise to what he believes the County should adopt. He also stated that he is willing to make the compromise because he believes the mega yacht industry has benefits for the community that are beyond anyone's imagination. He continued that he did not feel cargo ships are a benefit to the public or their safety. He stated that the plan has had thousands of hours of the public's and elected official's time put into it and finds it difficult to understand why anyone would hesitate to adopt this. Mr. Lounds stated that he would like to have more time to study the information to see if he can truly comprehend all of the information included in it. He continued that he has reviewed the information several times over the last week but felt that more time would help him understand it better and would allow him time to make comments and ask questions. Mr. Murphy stated that under the Comprehensive Plan statute requirements, deepwater ports are given great latitude in development of their Master Plans. He continued that the deepwater ports set what they want to do within the port environment. Most ports are operated by a government entity that controls all or most of the property within the port. He stated that the authority of the Board of County P & Z Meeting May 16, 2002 Page 14 '-' "'-II (JP1\~'''HFil'''~~9'' I ,.. ..,',., ""n~' '" ~ ¡:j ! r¿\i¡1.BÙ ~- rt~.ß~!"'elál-- TO ~\H\~:~"']~ 8~ lONJNG Commissioners manages the Port of Fort Pierce. He continued that their responsibility WA~:iiJ~..;;;:~¡mJ ¡1PPROVAI develop a policy plan for the operations of the Port. The implementation of the Plan, in terms of land use control, is the responsibility of the City of Fort Pierce. He also stated that part of the port planning areas lies within the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County. That makes it necessary to include this Port Master Plan in the County's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Merritt questioned if the hours invested into the port plan were by paid county employees. Mr. Murphy stated that it was not only Staff, but also many hours of public input. He stated that once the Port Authority adopts a Master Plan for the Port, the controlling Comprehensive Plan must be amended to include that plan. He continued that the County provided the Master Plan for the Port of Fort Pierce to be incorporated into the County's Comprehensive Plan. He also stated that the Local Planning Agency is being asked to determine if they feel that the Master Plan is consistent with the existing Goals, Objectives and Policies of the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. He stated the Staff analysis points out why they believe the Port Master Plan is consistent with those previously cited policies. He also stated that the LPA is being asked to forward a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners that the Port Master Plan meets that criterion. He continued that any questions or comments they have regarding the specifics of any part of the Port Master Plan will be provided to Staff, to allow them time to respond, or to the Board of County Commissioners to send to the Port Authority to address. Mr. Lounds stated that others have had the benefit of many years developing this and he has only had a week to review it. He stated that he would not be able to give an honest opinion, pro or con, regarding this without time to further review and come back with a list of questions. He continued that he would be able to compile that list between now and the next meeting. Mr. Hearn stated that he is concerned about delaying this issue this evening because there are three corporations looking to develop the area and would bring economic prosperity that will never been seen in any other way. He continued that they have been patient over the past year waiting for this process to happen and he feels there has been sufficient time and effort by the public and staff and attorney's at Florida Atlantic University. He stated that the Board of County Commissioners has already approved this wording and been involved in the process over the past few years and he feels confident that this is as good a plan as they will be able to come up with. Mr. Grande stated that he agreed with Mr. Hearn and has been involved in the process. He also stated that he would like to stress the fact that the parallel process of selecting the developers is under way and the developers have already submitted their qualifications. He continued that the committee has already met and eliminated one of four bidders and the three remaining bidders are going to be asked to submit detailed proposals that conform to the port plan. He stated that he felt it is extremely important that the port plan be put in place as a sub element of the Coastal Element as quickly as possible. He also stated that if there would happen to be any mistakes in the plan, it is amendable and fixable and doesn't need to be absolutely peñect right now. Chairman McCurdy questioned if the County owns the property. Mr. Murphy stated that the Board of County Commissioners would be asked to schedule additional presentations from the RFQ submitters. He continued that there were four RFQ's submitted, one was rejected as non- responsive and there are three others that the evaluation committee and the Board of County Commissioners will review in a workshop environment. He also stated that the County does not own, other than the Harbor Point property, any property within the port area. He stated that they P & Z Meeting May 16, 2002 Page 15 [..... .,..- "';-;,¿¡' HI'.~ .~'Þ'?~iw ~ '-" ......, ":''''!f'¡'' ;~...'J',t-~i¡U ., ''''''l·''··..l " 1', ' , ~ f il . '.v '" 1"\ are looking into acquiring some property for port development. He continued that the Port Master Plan is more than the port activity area and includes issues regarding the jetties, beach re- nourishment issues and Taylor Creek restorations. He stated that those are ongoing projects and in order to secure State and Official assistance funding the port plan must be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that those areas are inCluded in the proposed plan and are shown on by the blue dotted line on the map provided in the LPA packets. He continued that if the LPA feels they need additional time they could come back with their additional questions on May 30th and then this could still be heard at the Board of County Commissioners Meeting on June 4th. Mr. Merritt stated that he has been here for sixty-four years and has seen millions of dollars spent on port studies and that if the County attempted to obtain ownership of the property it would take probably two years to do if the owner is unwilling. He continued that he has not been party to the past port studies and feels that he is being asked to blindly forward something that he is not comfortable with. He stated that he felt the mega yacht corporations are aware that the County doesn't own the land, they couldn't make a deal with the landowner and that is why they came to the County and asked them to buy it so they could make the deal with the County. He continued that he would not blindly give his approval to a plan when he doesn't know what he is voting on. Mr. Hearn stated that he understood where Mr. Merritt was coming from but that their responsibility is to do the best they can with the information they are provided. He continued that the studies he referenced were on if cargo enterprises would be profitable in S1. Lucie County and they all felt that it was inconclusive or non-profitable to the County. He also stated that he has participated heavily in the process of this plan and the public has been very involved. He continued that if the members of the LP A wanted more information they could appear at the Board of County Commissioners meeting as members of the public and voice their questions and concerns there. Mr. Murphy stated that the ports develop their master plans and then provide them to the respective unit of local government to be incorporated into their comprehensive plans. He stated that. the LPA's role is to review that plan for consistency with the adopted Goals, Objectives and Policies of the local Comprehensive Plan. He continued that if they find it is consistent or inconsistent with those, then they make their recommendation accordingly and it gets forwarded on to the Board of County Commissioners for further review. He also stated that if they have specific questions about the plan itself they need to be referred back to the port authority for addressing and clarification. He continued that County Staff does not have the authority to change anything in the Port Master Plan and the only one with the ability to do that is the port authority. He stated that the LPA should make a recommendation one way or the other but can add conditions or comments to the Board of County Commissioners to refer back to the port authority for review and refinement. Mr. Jones questioned that if the Board of County Commissioners refers it back to the port authority, would it be presented to the LPA for review again. Mr. Murphy advised that is correct. Mr. Merritt asked if a separate port authority would be established if the County acquires all of the port property. Mr. Murphy stated he does not have that information. Mr. Grande stated that he believes the structure of the port authority is mutually exclusive from the ownership of the property. He advised that there are four different methodologies for port authorities: elected, appointed, appointed locally, appointed by the Governor or having the Board of County Commissioners sit as the port authority. He continued that who the port authority is doesn't P & Z Meeting May 16,2002 Page 16 '-' ...., ~2 r:,..~"Î~ if'.if:' U ftI rn ¡!;\ L -j t,; ';'1 ~~.1,~ ,;; 1;" '.J- ~ l.i' ,~l X-~: II>."WQ ¡". ~'-_;"i!l; ¡;¡¡ r.: ...j, tllJ"Ù~ depend on who owns the property and that the role of the plan is not dependant on who owns the property either. He stated that whomever controls the development of the property would have to comply with this master plan. Mr. Lounds questioned if that was correct. Mr. Murphy stated that the plan establishes the basic policies for development of the port and those areas under the port's authority. He continued that the land use control, building, permitting and those types of issues, would be the regulatory responsibility of the appropriate permitting authority. Mr. Grande stated that this plan would be complied with no matter who owns the property. ?1N[~¡r. <- ,"...,' ï\t. ~ ;,] .~ -':'-:''''''''''1 n f',~f r~~'iU \I a Mr. Akins stated that he agrees with Mr. Merritt and that the port has been in flux for the forty years that he has been in St. Lucie County. He also stated that he agrees with Mr. Hearn too and that this probably the most dynamic opportunity that the port has had and he would be willing to take a chance on the proposal tonight and put it up for a vote and move on. Chairman McCurdy opened the Public Hearing, Ms. Shirley Burlingham of 5312 Loggerhead Place stated that she has been to every one of the meetings that the consultants had. She stated that there were people from all over the County who were very involved and concerned that attended those meetings. She continued that they went through it and there had been several very long evenings going over these issues. She stated that this is probably the best document that could be developed. She also stated that she felt they had taken everything into consideration and it was well publicized and had been a very long process. She stated that her recommendation would be to send it to the Board of the County Commissioners for review. Mr. Lounds asked Ms. Burlingham if the adoption of this plan would take the opportunity out of this plan for cargo shipments out of the port. Ms. Burlingham stated that she did not believe so and it only limits them to 28 feet in depth. Mr. Lounds stated that deepwater cargo would not be able to come here because of that restriction and this would only allow for light cargo. Ms. Burlingham stated that it does allow for cargo, scientific organizations and university sites too and this opens up many other areas as well. Mr. Hearn stated that the developers that want to come into the Fort Pierce waterfront and build upscale, quality developments don't want to do so next to large cargo operations. He continued that when Nancy Graham, a representative for the former owner of the port was here she was asked to follow a mixture of upscale development and cargo development on the same piece of property and she advised them that she didn't believe it could be done. He stated that many upscale developers have walked away because of the cargo issue that was always there. He also stated that the community has made it known over the years that cargo development was not favorable because it is degrading to the environment and the adjacent waterways. He continued that the plan being presented is flexible enough to allow the existing cargo development to continue and also gives some protection to the mega yacht industry. He stated that there are people who have invested a lot of money in this community to live here, to work here, and to enjoy the Fort Pierce waterfront. Mr.- Grande pointed out that Policy 1.2.3 on page twenty-four is intended to ensure that the existing citrus cargo facility is protected and the intention of the majority was that none of the existing facilities that are serving the citrus industry in the area would be adversely affected. Mr. Merritt stated that the mega yacht industry was not able to come to terms with Lloyd Bell because of money. He stated that he felt they went to the County so that they could make a better deal with the taxpayers subsidizing it. He stated that he would not blindly approve this. P & Z Meeting May 16, 2002 Page 17 ~~!'l.nr! ~ ~M L'~ ~.;;¡ ~ ,_~ ~ ~?i\._ ~ ~ B ¡¡'U"fìn~ ~ ""'" ','mHMt' t>'L¡¡~;~~nu 'f'l'~"'''·¡·L t:, ;Jf~ -'", ~'t ::J. ..J . _f.\.\'... Mr. Lounds stated that his problem is not with the mega yachts because they bring class and stability to St. Lucie County. He continued that he has a problem with limiting the Port of Fort Pierce to the development of mega yachts. He stated that he felt the port could be designed to be mixed-use as was voted on by the citizens of St. Lucie County. He continued that everyone thinks of a giant steam ship coming in when they speak of cargo but that would not be able to happen due to the size. He stated that island transportation is a different class of freight. He also stated that the citrus industry is not a big user of the port today because most of the citrus shipped out goes through the ports in Palm Beach and Melbourne. He stated that he feels the future of St. Lucie County is being based on a mega yacht deal and that he needs more information to show that the port can be utilized for a true mixed use as was voted on. Mr. Grande stated that the master plan is geared towards the marine industry and not to the exclusion of cargo but with the aim of co-existing with the existing facilities. He also stated that those developers who are capable of bringing mega yacht facilities would not co-exist with neighbors who negatively impact their facilities. He continued that they are saying they need enough room for their workspace and would like to have recreational areas too. He also stated that it is not one particular company, but the entire mega yacht industry that feels this way. He stated that he feels their request is reasonable and pointed out that they have tried to come to an agreement with the existing owner of the property to no avail. He continued that he feels this is a private owner who has worked against the goals of the County, as a whole. He stated that this private owner has stated that he would like to see a liquid natural gas facility and tank fanns. He also stated that he did not feel these types of uses would be beneficial. He continued that private owner's rights are very important but not at the expense of the public domain. Seeing no one else, Chairman McCurdy closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Jones stated that he is in support of the project but like Mr. Lounds and others, he doesn't feel he has had enough time to review the information. He also stated that he would be willing to come back in two weeks after he has had additional time to review the document thoroughly. Mr. Merritt asked why it is so important to get a recommendation one-way or the other right away. Mr. Murphy stated that there are some other issues with regard to this issue that are being presented during the month of June and some other matters relative to permitting that require a transmittal action by the Board of County Commissioners in June to keep everything moving. Mr. Merritt questioned if there is a commitment in writing from the mega yacht industry with the County. Mr. Murphy stated that he has not seen one but does not know for sure that there is not one. Mr. Jones asked why the LPA has received this information with such a time constraint. Mr. Murphy stated that the Port Authority acted on this in April and this is the first meeting it could be brought too. He also stated that he realizes there are some time issues but there is are some funding deadlines and other schedule issues but if the LPA needs additional time, he understands. He stated that if they would like to have a special meeting on May 30th to discuss this issue further after they have all had additional time to review the material, he would schedule it. Mr. Lounds asked Mr. Hearn if he would have any issues with them continuing this issue until the 30th so they would have additional time to compile some questions and discuss this issue with some people for some information so they could be more productive. Mr. Hearn stated that it is P & Z Meeting May 16, 2002 Page 18 '-" ...."" l')~'~''r'H'=~~Vr''¡¡''~ 'l ' \1 ~t~ ~t ~ ~¡'\I !1';¡ ~ ~¡ "~ ~'b,~. , InI/IftlI --<)~ ,~...",:.ri! ~ t:~...tl t\ TO 2.\ (1 :-:: _' ".,~ ,., ~, '," "., 'J! not up to him to decide that and that he has been involved in this plan since day one an~¥è~l~:¿; cè" is an expert on this issue, as well as Mr. Grande and other members of the community. He also stated that some people in the community want to see a large industrial cargo port in Fort Pierce, but he does not think that is what is best for the future of the County. He continued that this document should be sent to the Board of County Commissioners for their approval and doing so does not take away the right of future boards to make amendments to it. He stated that he is asking the LPA to have faith in the public's input and forward the plan to the Board for their review. 'iGW~lr '. "''o'l\¡:¡J ''''''-''''/"l ~-';NU\JA Mr. Hearn made a motion to forward Ordinance No. 02-014 to amend the Coastal Element of the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan to the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Grande seconded the motion for further discussion. Mr. Grande stated that he felt there were two policies listed that he thought were redundant. Mr. Kelly stated that on page 27, Policy 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 appear to be very similar. He stated in the first policy, "service and repair yards, marina facilities" is included but not in the second policy. He also stated that the second policy includes "marine research vessels" which is not in the first policy. He stated he couldn't determine what the writer of the plan intended and just wanted to point it out. Mr. Grande stated that he would leave the motion and leave the wording the way that it is written thus far. Mr. Grande stated that he felt the motion should be made to include a change in wording for Policy 1.2.3 on page 24. He stated that he felt it should be changed to read, "The Port of Ft. Pierce shall continue to support limited cargo operations up to but not exceeding their existing level in the Port Operations Area." Mr. Akins asked if that amendment to the motion would affect the progress of this plan. Mr. Murphy stated it would not and would be a comment that is forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for their discretion and review. Mr. Lounds questioned what Mr. Grande's interpretation of that change is. Mr. Grande stated that change would protect everything that is currently there now and the current owners of property that is being used for cargo facilities. This would allow them to extend to the extent that could within their current areas of operation. He continued that the current wording, as it is, is ambiguous because it strictly depends on what a person's interpretation of limited cargo operations is. He stated that there should be a fmite limitation and that should be what we have now use to it's highest and maximum use. Mr. Lounds questioned if someone is currently operating a cargo area would be allowed to continue to operate and expand under this changed wording. Mr. Grande stated that is correct and they can expand to the extent that is physically possible in that area. Mr. Heam stated that he would amend his motion to include the requested change in language. Mr. Hearn made an amended motion to forward Ordinance No. 02-014 to amend the Coastal Element of the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to change the wording of Policy 1.2.3 on page 24 to read, ''The Port of Ft. Pierce shall continue to support limited cargo operations up to but not exceeding their existing level in the Port Operations Area." and it does meet the criteria listed below: P & Z Meeting May 16, 2002 Page 19 " .,.~\!"'') ~~\,.- \\1f¡.~\(\\'~'~ 't \~t\rr 'l,,\<Yt';, :r.' ~ ....."... ~: " \:, ;~ I!,;!" . . o<Ot~·\ ..t\~~ ,,,"."1;. ~ ,\ ...." ,--""",~'~"':\ ~:- .'" ~'~ "_~\'t\'{.~~.".II\' . ....,,; "':1 1\... ~~. .,' f '. ,"} . ,-" 1. The plan is consistent with State, Regional and Local Plans. 2. The adoption of the plan amendment will not adversely affect the public interest, health, safety, and general welfare. 3. The petition is consistent with the specific Goals, Objectives and Policies governing the proposed plan amendment" 4. The County's plan amendment review standards have been met. Mr. Grande seconded the amended motion. Mr. Jones stated that he is disappointed because he believes at least three people on the LPA would like to have additional time to review the document and make comments that would not delay the process. He also stated that he got the impression that Mr. Hearn felt it would be best to have a unanimous vote on this issue but doesn't believe that would be possible since at least three members have requested to have more time. He continued that he is in support of the project but would like the LPA to reconsider the motion and allow more time for review. Mr. Grande stated that he understands their point but this will go from them to the Board of County Commissioners for another public hearing. He continued that they have the same opportunity to speak and make their opinions felt at that Commission meeting as they have there. He also stated that he believes that at least he and Mr. Lounds have taken the opportunity to testify at the Commission meeting relating to items that have come before the LPA in the past. He stated that anyone who feels they don't have a sufficient handle here certainly has the ability to spend the time between now and the Commission meeting to prepare their corrunents or their suggestions and bring them up at the Commission meeting. He also stated that he too had hoped that they would have a majority tonight to move this forward so as to not threaten the progress that is very important. Mr. Merritt stated that he felt Mr. Grande was missing the point and that asking for a delay may enable them to send a unanimous vote or if they send it forward tonight, it would be a fragmented vote. Mr. Hearn stated that they are continually asked to vote on issues that they don't fully understand and don't have a lot of time to review. He also stated that many times they vote with the group so as to tell the Board they are unanimous and putting this off for two weeks would not be the end of the world. He continued that this item has been reviewed thoroughly by the public and he apologized that each member of the LPA was not involved because he felt it was an enlightening process. Mr. Merritt stated that it would not have been possible for him to be that involved due to his workloads. Mr. Lounds stated that he felt Mr. Jones brought up some very good points and he feels that he needs the extra two weeks to get some opinions from other people or else he would have to vote against forwarding it tonight. He also stated that he is sure that Mr. Grande and he have come before the Board only as private citizens in the past. Mr. Merritt stated that he is not against or for cargo operations but he stated he was concerned about the time constraints. He also stated that he felt that the mega yacht industry would be requesting tax incentives to be subsidized by the taxpayer because they were not able to come to an agreement with Lloyd Bell. Mr. Hearn stated that the cargo industry, in his opinion, would ask for many more tax incentives than the mega yacht industry. P & Z Meeting May 16,2002 Page 20 "" ....." . ",".·''',l1'''~~U'M æ, D ~; f~ n~.~ :'. lJj~ ~.g !3 ~'. .~. ~1 ~! ~ --- iø~;~~"¿j~ ~1 t! .!û,:; ~_'5I Upon a roll call vote, the motion was approved with a vote of 5-2 (with Mr. Merktt·~rid··' Mr. Lounds voting against) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners. P & Z Meeting May 16,2002 Page 21 Zf~;.rNG ,\,?HÜ\J ,~1. 'w' Agenda Request Item ~mber 6 Date: June 4,2002 Consent [ ] Regular [ X] Public Hearing [ ] leg.[ ] Quasi-JD [ ] To: Board of County Commissioners Submitted By: Public Works Deol.-Road & Bridqe Division SUBJECT: Multi Way Stop Study at Citrus Avenue and Country Garden lane and Measures to Control Speeding. BACKGROUND: See attached memo. FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Board direction to Staff to perform the Multi Way Stop Study at Citrus Avenue and Country Garden lane and to Investigate Measures to Control Speeding at the April 23rd Board Meeting RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board consider installing a Multi Way Stop at Citrus Avenue and Country Garden lane and to provide direction to staff as to whether to proceed with implementing a Traffic Calming Program for SI. Lucie County. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: r;?t.'--. [_'.APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Staff to meet with residents to determine exact location of stop Douglas M. Anderson signs and bring back to the Board on County Administrator June 1 8, 2001- ¡fJr",r Þ ITtt",./ ~I}:: /N7 [X] County Attorney ¡l..f' I. [X] Originating Dept. Public Works -0 5-0 Coordination/Sig natures ] Mgt. & Budget ] Purchasing ] Co. Eng lather [ ] Finance (check for copy only. if applicable) '-'" 'wtfI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners VIA: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director FROM: J. Scott Herring, Road & Bridge Manage~ June 4, 2002 DATE: SUBJECT: Multi Way Stop at Citrus Avenue and Country Garden Lane At the April 23rd Board meeting the Board requested that staff conduct a Multi Way Stop Study at the intersection of Citrus Avenue and County Garden Lane. The Board also requested that additional information be presented to the Board concerning speeding issues. Staff has completed the Multi Way Stop Study at the intersection of Citrus Avenue and County Garden Lane. Historically, St. Lucie County Traffic Operations has received numerous requests to install multi way stops at various locations throughout the County. It has been County policy for at least eight (8) years that when this type of request was received, a study would be performed in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). This document has been adopted by virtually every state and the Federal Government. The most recent version of this manual was adopted by the State of Florida in March of 2001. The MUTCD contains speCific criteria that should be examined during the Engineering Study to determine if a multi way stop should be installed. These criteria are basically accident statistics and traffic volumes. The accident criteria is basically five (5) or more crashes in a 12 month period that would be corrected by a stop sign. The volume criteria is 300 vehicles per hour for at least eight( 8) hours a day, and 200 vehicles per hour for the same eight hours on the minor street. As part of the guidance provided in the MUTCD, the manual recommends that Stop signs should not be used for speed control. Part of the reasons not to use Stop signs for speed control are, that use of stop signs where they are not warranted my lead to the disregard of stop sign at all locations. Additionally, studies have shown that when stops signs are used for speed control, the speed of drivers may actually increase between stop signs to "make Upfl for the perceived lost time by having the vehicles stop at an unnecessary stop sign. The appropriate pages from the MUTCD are attached to this memo. '-' ..."", Page - 2 - Memo to: BOCC Date: June 4, 2002 Subject: Multi Way Stop at Citrus Avenue and Country Garden Lane In analyzing the data for the study conducted for Citrus Avenue and Country Garden Lane, the Highest Volume on Citrus Avenue was 105 vehicles in an hour and on County Garden Lane was 22 vehicles in an hour. There were no reported accidents in a three year period. We have also attached the information received from the Sheriff's Dept. from when their Speed trailer was on Citrus Avenue. The accident referenced in this information occurred at the intersection of Citrus Avenue and Saeger Avenue. This data does not indicate the need for a multi way stop at this intersection. Therefore, staff is not recommending that a multi way stop be installed at this intersection. However, it should be noted that the Board has the ability to override staff's recommendation and direct staff to install multi way stops at this intersection. Speeding is a concern in various locations throughout the state and the country. This issue has become a 'Quality of Life" issue that various agencies are dealing with. Most drivers will drive a speed limit at which the driver feels comfortable for the conditions. These conditions include the width of the roadway, presence of other vehicles, and the drivers own capabilities. Typically when setting speed limits a speed survey is done at the speed limit recommended to be posted at the 85% percentile speed. This is the actual speed at which 85% of the drivers are driving at or less. One condition that may have contributed to increased speeding is that the legislature recently revised the speeding fines as contained on Florida Statute 318. Currently if a driver is going between 1 and 5 mph over the speed limit, the driver will not receive a ticket, but a warning, unless you are in a school zone. If the driver is going between 6 and 9 mph over the speed limit, the base fine is $25.00. Once a driver exceeds 10 mph over the speed limit, the base fine increases to $100.00. This change reduced the financial penalty to drivers who exceed the speed limit at the lower ranges and consequently have increased speeding in the 1 to 9mph over the limit range. In considering various other methods for speed control, there exists a myriad of options available to be considered. These options range from physical construction, such as traffic humps, speed tables, chicanes, speed cushions, and planting landscaping adjacent to the roadway to give the appearance of a narrower roadway. Other non physical options include increased/enhanced enforcement, the use of "smart trailers" such as the one the Sheriff's Dept. uses, variable message boards, and increased signage such as the speeding fines sign and the flashing speed que signs on Oleander Avenue, Indian River Drive, and in Lakewood Park, and education measures. Staff will also be attending a "Speed Management Workshop" on June 12th put on by the Institute of Police Technology and Management to obtain additional ideas and to see what other communities are doing about this problem. '-" ....¡ Page - 3 - Memo to: BOCC Date: June 4, 2002 Subject: Multi Way Stop at Citrus Avenue and Country Garden Lane In reviewing various programs throughout the State and Country, the requirements and costs vary widely. Additionally, staff has requested input from both the Sheriff's Dept and the St. Lucie County Fire District concerning speed control issues. Several of the non physical options stated above are currently in use by the Sheriff's Department. The Fire District is primally concerned about the impact any type of traffic calming would have on response times. The letters received from the Sheriff's Dept. and Fire District are attached. This is a concern that is shared throughout the State and the Country. The City of Austin Texas, according to their web site has recently discontinued the use of speed humps because of concerns from the Emergency Service Providers. If the Board were to implement a Traffic Calming Program in the County, staff can determine which standards would be most appropriate for the County. These standards would include the severity of the speeding problem, the location of the problems, the amount of traffic and the impact on Emergency Service Providers. One aspect that has to be seriously considered in any traffic calming program, is that the problem is handled on a neighborhood basis. In other words, by putting in traffic calming measures on one street, you don't want to create a problem on another street one block over. An example of this would be if traffic calming measures were to be implemented in Lakewood Park, the entire subdivision would have to be examined and not just look at individual roadways. This would be a situation where the County would request the support of the Homeowner's Association to indicate that the entire neighborhood is in favor of the project. Another situation to be dealt with is the cost to implement traffic calming. Speed humps, speed tables, and speed cushions cost between $5,000.00 and $10,000.00 depending on installation factors and other concerns such as drainage issues, and utilities design issues. St. Lucie County does not currently have funding identified for these types of Traffic Calming Improvements. Staff believes that the best option to pay for these types of improvements would be an MSBU. This would provide the funding necessary and also indicate neighborhood "buy in" of the project since the neighborhood is funding the traffic calming measures. Staff is requesting that the Board provide direction if the Board wishes to implement a Traffic Calming Program. Staff estimates it will take between three (3) and six (6) months to design the program and identify the funding requirements for this program. If the Board wishes to implement this program, it may require additional staff to fully implement the program. These issues will be fully explored as part of the program to be implemented if the Board directs staff to proceed. JSH/sb Attachments Page 2B-6 '-" "!fecember 2000 j Guidance: The Expressway and Freeway sizes should be used for higher-speed applications to provide larger signs for increased visibility and recognition. Option: The Minimum size may be used on low-speed roadways where reduced legend size would be adequate for the regulation or where physical conditions preclude the use of the other sizes. The Oversized size may be used for those special applications that require increased emphasis, improved recognition, or increased legibility. I f ¡ i l Section 2B.04 STOP Sign <RI-!) Standard: When a sign is used to indicate that traffic is always required to stop, a STOP (RI-I) sign shall be used. The STOP sign shall be an octagon with a white legend and border on a red background. Secondary legends shall not be used on STOP sign faces. If appropriate, a supplemental plaque (Rl-3 or Rl-4) shall be used to display a secondary legend. Such plaques shall have a white legend and border on a red background. If the number of approach legs controlled by STOP signs at an intersection is three or more, the numeral on the supplemental plaque, if used, shall correspond to the actual number of legs controlled by STOP signs. At intersections where all approaches are controlled by STOP signs (see Section 2B.07), a supplemental plaque (Rl-3 or Rl-4) shall be mounted below each STOP sign. Option: The ALL WAY (RI-4) supplemental plaque may be used instead of the 4-WAY (RI-3) supplemental plaque. Support: The design and application of Stop Beacons are described in Section 4K.05. Sect. 2B.03 to 2B.04 June 200 1 "" December 2000 STOP R1-1 SPEED LIMIT 50 R2-1 June 2001 lIB R1-3 ~ SPEED LIMIT OR 80 ij k-m lh II NIGHT 45 R2-3 TRUCKS TRUCKS 40 OR 60 ~ km/h I) ~ ALL WAY R1-4 R2-2 OR ..." Page 2B-7 ;¡ ~ T R1-2 ~ METRIC ~ Sect. 28.04 \.- Page 2B-8 ~ December 2000 Section 2B.05 STOP Sign Applications f Guidance: STOP signs should not be used unless engineering judgment indicates that one or more of the following conditions exist: A. Intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule would not be expected to provide reasonably safe operation; B. Street entering a through highway or street; C. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area; and/or D. High speeds, restricted view, or crash records indicate that a need for control by the STOP sign. Standard: Because the potential for conflicting commands could create driver confusion, STOP signs shall not be installed at intersections where traffic control signals are installed and operating. ~ Portable or part-time STOP signs shall not be used except for emergency and temporary traffic control zone purposes. Guidance: STOP signs should not be used for speed control. STOP signs should be installed in a manner that minimizes the numbers of vehicles having to stop. At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Section 2B.08). Once the decision has been made to install two-way stop control, the decision regarding the appropriate street to stop should be based on engineering judgment. In most cases, the street carrying the lowest volume of traffic should be stopped. A STOP sign should not be installed on the major street unless justified by a traffic engineering study. Sect. 28.05 June 200\ \w December 2000 -...I Page 2B-9 þ Support: The following are considerations that might influence the decision regarding the appropriate street upon which to install a STOP sign where two streets with relatively equal volumes and/or characteristics intersect: A. Stopping the direction that conflicts the most with established pedestrian crossing activity or school walking routes; B. Stopping the direction that has obscured vision, dips, or bumps that already require drivers to use lower operating speeds; C. Stopping the direction that has the longest distance of uninterrupted flow approaching the intersection; and D. Stopping the direction that has the best sight distance to conflicting traffic. The use of the STOP sign at highway-railroad grade crossings is described in Section 8B.07. Section 2B.06 STOP Sign Placement Standard: þ The STOP sign shall be installed on the correct side of the traffic lane to which it applies. When the STOP sign is installed at this required location and the sign visibility is restricted, a Stop Ahead sign (see Section 2C.26) shall be installed in advance of the STOP sign. The STOP sign shall be located as close as practical to the intersection it regulates, while optimizing its visibility to the road user it is intended to regulate. STOP signs and YIELD signs shall not be mounted on the same post. Guidance: Stop lines, when used to supplement a STOP sign, should be located at the point where the road user should stop (see Section 38.16). If only one STOP sign is installed on an approach, the STOP sign should not be placed on the far side of the intersection. . Where two roads intersect at an acute angle, the STOP sign should be positioned at an angle or else shielded so that the legend is out of view of traffic to which it does not apply. June 200 1 Sect. 2B.05 to 2B.06 ~ Page 2B-I 0 ..."" December 2000 Where there is a marked crosswalk at the intersection, the STOP sign should be installed in advance of the crosswalk line nearest to the approaching traffic. Option: At wide-throat intersections or where two or more approach lanes of traffic exist on the signed approach, observance of the stop control may be improved by the installation of an additional STOP sign on the left side of the road and/or the use of a stop line. At channelized intersections, the additional STOP sign may be effectively placed on a channelizing island. Support: Figure 2A-2 shows some typical placements of STOP signs. Section 2B.07 Multiway Stop Applications Support: Multiway stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with multiway stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multiway stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in Section 2B.05 also apply to multi way stop applications. Guidance: The decision to install multi way stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multiway STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation. Such crashes include right- and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street SeCl. 2B,Q6 to 2B.07 June 200! \..: December 2000 ....J Page 2B-ll þ approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but 3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 65 kmJh (40 mph), the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the above values. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.l, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. !! Option: Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to controlleft-tum conflicts; þ B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to safely negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multiway stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. Section 2B.08 YIELD Sign (R1-2) Standard: The YIELD (Rl-2) sign shall be a downward-pointing equilateral triangle with a wide red border and tbe legend YIELD in red on a white background. Support: ~ The YIELD sign assigns right-of-way to traffic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled by a YIELD sign need to slow down or stop when necessary to avoid interfering with conflicting traffic. June 2001 Sect 2B.07 to 2B.08 '-' ..I ~betíff n~lr~ @ IT KEN J. MASCARA Ii R1 Telephone: (561) 462-3200· Fax: (561) 489-5851 "..' ~MY - 9 4700 West Midway Road' Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 2,' 111'/ '-."./,-'l. -Ì Commissioner Doug Coward, Chairman Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 IX ' tU"~- (f1 \ú1/ / \11 1l/r'¿J. J:J . V ~11) ;>,11 G 11 : ...~.'. ¡.-\.! , '~".', v r\...· ~::'( May 7, 2002 RE: Traffic Issues on Citrus Avenue Dear Commissioner Coward: As you are aware during the April 23, 2002 Board of County Commissioners meeting, Mrs. Soap, a Citrus Avenue resident, addressed her concerns with traffic on Citrus Avenue. Attached for your review is a copy of a memorandum from Sgt. Kevin Dietrich, Traffic Unit Supervisor, to Captain Steve Reuther, Uniform Patrol Commander, addressing traffic issues on Citrus Avenue. During the S.M.A.R.T. trailer placement done on February 2, 2002, the average speed of most motorists on Citrus Avenue was 30.12 miles per hour, however, 204 of the 926 vehicles clocked were traveling over 35 miles per hour. This accounts for approximately 22 percent of the vehicles that were clocked on Citrus Avenue traveling 10 miles per hour over the posted 25 miles per hour speed limit. The St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office will continue to direct traffic patrols on Citrus Avenue to address speeding on this roadway. Upon review of the attached, should you have any questions or comments, please contact me. Re.CEIVED r IIAY ~ s~..""? ! C0.;..-V I ~", J,;'µ,::-'.:i<E ; \\~c'1 cÞ )1.\\ :? ts Attachment cc: Mr. Doug Anderson, County Administrator County Commissioners " (ì '1 I'¡ , "(, y''oJ ~,; '- ~ MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23, 2002 TO: Captain S. Reuther, 108 Road Patrol command~r FROM: Sgt. K.A. Dietrich, 146 ~JA7J Traffic Unit Superviso Pff:;'j REFER: , Traffic Issues on Citrus Avenue A lot of the issues on Citrus Avenue comes from the construction of the roadway, wlùch is narrow, and at part just a one-lane roadway. The community of which the roadway has served bas·out grown the roadway. With this in mind, the Sheriff's Office has taken several approaches to dealing with the complaints. *S.M.A.R.T. trailer which helps educate the commuting public on the roadway as it displays the speed limit on the roadway (Citrus Avenue) and then displays the speed of the vehicle as it approaches the trailer. On February 02, 2002 the SMART trailer conducted a survey of vehicles that passed on Citrus Avenue near the intersection of Buckeye Drive. The results are as follows: Date: February 2, 2002 - Saturday Time: 10:15 am to 5:30 pm (7 hours 15 minutes) Total vehicles surveyed: 926 vehicles Posted Speed: 25 mph Maximum Speed: 63 mph Average Speed: 30.12 mph Vehicles over 35 mph: 204 vehicles>~% Vehicles over 50 mph: 19 vehicles "'7 J,o/;- The SMART trailer has been placed on Citrus Avenue several times in 2002 and as recent as April 16, 2002. *Directed patrol hours spent on Citrus Avenue in 2002 (these are specific hours by traffic deputies, this does not include routine patrol or directed patrol by Road Patrol Deputies): 22.5 hours *Traffic related contacts on Citrus Avenue by the Sheriffs Office so far in 2002: 79 traffic stops 41 were for a speed violation There has been one traffic crash on Citrus Avenue in 2002. We will continue to monitor Citrus A venue and take the appropriate action. YO) ]11}J '- ......, SMART <citrus and buckeye> <cloudy> POSTED SPEED LIMIT: <25> 3URVEY STARTED: <02/03/04 MIN SPEED ALLOWED <11> SURVEY SUMMARY 10:27> FILENAME: 02030410.DAT MAX SPEED ALLOWED <100> IME 10:1510:30 10:45 11:00 11:1511:30 11:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 EH. S 17 22 23 24 32 24 33 22 25 40 29 25 40 15 29 23 30 40 44 34 VG. 25.5 27.5 31.1 32.3 29.5 32.8 29.0 30.2 34.8 32.0 30.0 32.1 30.2 28.7 32.7 30.2 28.4 27.0 31.5 28.2 29.4 IME 15:30 15:45 16:00 15:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 EH. 48 41 44 47 25 30 44 53 15 .VG. 28.5 30.3 30.4 29.1 33.6 30.0 30.3 30.0 28.5 . rOTAL VEHICLES = 926 MINIMUM SPEED = 11 MAXIMUM SPEED -;;". 63." '} \VERAGE SPEED = 30.12 50th PERCENTILE = 30 85th PERCENTILE = 37 rEN MILE PACE .26' to 35 END OF REPORT ~T SURVEY pageJ of 3 <citrus and buckéÿe> <cloudy> POSTED SPEED LIMIT: <25> 3URVEY STARTED: <02/03/04 10:27> FILENAME: 02030410.DAT '. '. MIN SPEED ALLOWED <11> MAX SPEED ALLOWED <100> ( AXIS = SPEED BINS Y AXIS = TIME BINS 11 '2 13 14 '5 16 '7 '8 '9 20 2' 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3' 32 33 34 35 0: 15 0 0 0 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 0 , 0 3 2 1 1 2 0 , 1 0 0 0:45 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 . , 2 0 1 0 2 2 3 3 ':00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 , 1 2 0 ':15 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 , 4 3 4 0 , , 1 0 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 1 0 1 1 , 0 1 , 1 0 2 1 0 2 4 7 " :45 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 , 0 2 , 0 1 ~ 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 3 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 , 2 , , 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 2 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 , 2 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 , 12:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 , 2 2 0 , 2 0 1 3 0 , 12:45 , 0 0 0 , 2 0 0 2 , 2 0 0 3 2 0 2 1 , 1 1 0 , 4 2 '3:00 0 0 0 0 , , 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 , 0 2 , 0 2 3 4 0 3 ',3: '5 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 , 2 0 0 , , 0 1 1 , 2 2 2 3 1 , 13:30 0 0 , 0 O' 0 1 , , , , , 2 2 6 , 0 2 2 1 3 3 0 3 2 13:45 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 2 0 , 0 2 0 2 , 2 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 , , 0 0 0 4 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 14:'5 0 0 , 0 1 0 0 0 , 0 , 0 2 , , , , , 2 0 3 0, , 0 , 14:30 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 , 0 0 2. 1 1 0 , 2 2 2 3 1 3 , 0 0 0 14:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 , 2 4 5 0 2 1 3 2 15:00 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 , 1 2 1 2 0 4 3 3 4 2 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 15: '5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 , 4 3 4 0 1 3 2 0 2 3 ; 5:30 0 0 , 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 , 2 4 , 3 5 3 3 2 3 1 2 5 , 15:45 , 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 2 1 , , 1 3 2 4 5 1 3 1 1 , ;6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 , 3 0 3 3 2 2 2 2 4 4 3 1 2 16: '5 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 , 4 3 4 2 2 2 5 3 1 2 2 15: 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 1 2 0 3 , 4 2 2 15:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 2 , 2 , 0 1 0 , 3 0 1 , 5 , 4 1 17:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 , 0 0 1 , 2 0 , , 3 2 2 5 2 3 3 6 17:'5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 , 3 3 2 2 4 2 0 1 6 0 2 5 , 4 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , , 0 0 0 , , 1 2 , 2 0 0 0 0 0 , VEH. 4 2 6 5 12 l' 5 '3 20 '6 22 '8 25 3' 40 46 48 48 44 52 52 49 49 49 55 7.ILE 0 0 , , 3 4 4 6 B '0 '2 '4 '7 20 24 29 34 40 44 50 56 61 66 72 77 '- ..." SMART SURVEY Page 2 of 3 <citrus and buckeye> <cloudy> POSTED SPEED LIMIT: <25> SURVEY STARTED: <02/03/04 10:27> FILENAME: 02030410.DAT MIN SPEED ALLOWED <11> MAX SPEED ALLOWED <100> X AXIS = SPEED BINS Y AXIS = TIME BINS 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 .:5; ¡ k-~¡¡"53' ,'54 55 56 57 58 59 60 10:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:4!; . 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 :OÒ : 2 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 :15 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 :45 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15' 2 3 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 2 4 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 1 2 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 14:15 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 1 0 2 0 0 0 O· 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 2 2 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15: 15 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 1 1 1 1 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 0 3 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 , 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 o ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 2 3 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VEH. 37 39 30 22 20 13 12 5 7 3 3 3 3 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,[LE 81 86 89 91 93 95 96 97 97 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 " \.. SMAR. T buckeye> SUR.VEY page"'-1 of 3 <citrus and <cloudy> POSTED SPEED LIMIT: <25> ;URVEY STARTED: <02/03/04 10:27> FILENAME: 02030410.DAT MIN SPEED ALLOWED <11> MAX SPEED ALLOWED <100> ( AXIS = SPEED BINS Y AXIS = TIME BINS ;W~~ 61 62 '63 0:15 0 0 0 0:30 0 0 0 0:45 0 0 0 1:00 0 0 0 1: 15 0 0 0 1:30 0 0 0 1 :45 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 :2:15 0 0 0 i2:30 0 0 0 ;2:45 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 3:15 0 0 0 ]3:30 0 0 0 13:45 - 0 0 1 14:00 0 0 0 14:15 0 0 0 4:30 0 0 0 :4:45 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 0 ! 5: 1 5 0 0 0 ; 5:30 0 0 0 I S:45 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 16: 15 0 0 0 16:30 0 0 0 16:45 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 17: 15 0 0 0 17:30 0 0 0 VEH. 0 0 1 %ILE 99 99 100 ~ .~ Jay Sizemore, Fire Chief Karen Jones. Admin. Assistant ~.~\'GUNTÝ-7a '-J ~ ¡....: 0 (f) ::þ X ')(. ~f OIS\~¢- 2400 Rhode Island Ave. Fort Pierce, FL 34950 Phone: 772.462.8301 Fax: 772.462.8461 ST. LUCIE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE CHIEF May 16, 2002 RELE::'YE: 0 MA y 1 7 2002 J. Scott Herring, P.E. Road & Bridge Manager Public Works Department 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 It i,.J.lC1! OOUH'lY ~Al:l ¡ BAlOOe Dear Mr. Herring; I appreciate your consideration in this very important matter. In reviewing literature regarding traffic- calming devices I have noted that there has been a significant increase in national discourse regarding this subject in recent years. As you may know, one of the Fire District's primary goals is to reduce EMS and Fire response times throughout our service area. Unfortunately, most studies conducted around the United States have shown that traffic-calming measures, by their nature, increase emergency response times. Speed humps, round-a-bouts, chicanes, lane narrowing, and altering traffic flows to one lane roads all have the same effect: delayed mitigation of a fire or medical emergency. Depending on the design of the traffic calming measure, where it is to be installed, and what apparatus must traverse it, the delay can range from a just a few seconds to 30 seconds - even ionger if multiple features are used in succession in the same general area. For this reason, the Fire District cannot give blanket support to the installation of such devices. There are, however, a few recent innovations with respect to traffic calming features that do not delay response times for Fire and EMS apparatus. The City of Austin, Texas has installed speed cushions that have little or no effect on large, wide wheel base vehicles. Their appearance is similar to a sea turtle shell and they are strategically placed in the roadway so that normal vehicle traffic must slow down, but emergency vehicles can simply straddle them. Other practical alternatives include reduced speed limits, and continued/expanded enforcement of existing ones by local authorities. The Fire District is not opposed to traffic calming features that do not delay response times. I might add that we also have concerns regarding these devices being installed along evacuation routes. Perhaps Mr. Southard, the County Emergency Director, may have some input on that issue. Our specific requirements for any of the aforementioned devices should they be implemented, would be that emergency responders are afforded a manner in which to drive over, circumvent, or bypass the device entirely without any delay in response or damage to the apparatus. Again, thank you for the opportunity to express my concerns. Please feel free to contact me if you desire to meet with my staff or myself regarding this issue. JS¡ffilY F~ " '-' ,,£RJJ' " . ~. ~ ...." § h criff ) KEN J. MASCARA .. .. <11 ..... Member National Sheriffs' Association Member Florida Sheriffs' Association 4700 West Midway Road, Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 Telephone: (561) 461-7300 . Fax (561) 489-5851 May 17, 2002 1. Scott Herring, P.E. Road and Bridge Manager RECEIVED ¡MAY 1 7 2002 \ S't LUCilE COIJffN ooAD ,I SlUDGe. Re: Measures to Control Speeding Complaints Mr. Herring, The Sheriff s Office is committed to the safety of the commuting public as well as our residents. The Sheriffs Office receives traffic related complaints on roadways through out the county and we diligently attempt to address them. The complaints vary from reckless drivers to loud music coming from vehicles. Our approach to addressing these traffic complaints come in three parts, education of the commuting public, enforcement of the traffic laws, and engineering of the roadways. Many of the ideas addressed in your letter could be used in a positive way to address speeding complaints on specific roadways. The Sheriff s Office is always open to new ideas and we are willing to work with your office in addressing these issues. The Sheriffs Office currently uses several tools and techniques to address the various complaints. We use traditional methods such as high visibility marked patrol vehicles, marked motorcycles, semi-marked patrol vehicles, unmarked vehicles, and the aviation unit to take enforcement action on traffic violators. The S.M.A.R.T. trailer is used to educate drivers of the posted speed limit and then it displays the vehicle's speed in an attempt to inform the driver. The manikin program (a manikin in a marked vehicle) has recently been implemented as an educational tool, to remind drivers to pay attention to their driving behavior. This is followed-up sporadically with a real deputy conducting enforcement. Also signs such as a list of the fines for speeding have been posted on roadways to educate speeding drivers of the costs associated with speeding. We have also used digital display boards to display traffic safety messages to the commuting public. We feel that through education, engineering and enforcement, we can be successful in curbing these traffic issues. We look forward to lending any assistance we can as we address specific complaints. Members of the traffic unit as well as I will be glad to meet with you to address steps in curbing the traffic issues. ¥~2).i~¥>~¿ Sgt. Kevin A. Dietrich Traffic Unit Supervisor (772)462-3296 City of Austin - Speed Hwnp \w wysi wyg://11/http://W...W.ci.austin.lx.uslroadworks/humps.htm -wi I Find! Options -----*----- AuSTIN -----El CITY CONN¡¡;C.TIO"'~ Speed Hump Toolbox Speed Cushions Traffic Circle Semi-diverter Curb Extensions DESCRIPTION: Speed humps are raised sections of pavement across the travel way. These devices are 22 feet in length and approximately 3 to 4 inches high. The design consists of 6 foot transitions to a 10 foot flat surface. The purpose of a speed hump is to reduce speeds by vertically deflecting the wheels and frame of a vehicle. The occupants experience an uncomfortable sensation if the vehicle travels at speeds greater than the design speed of the speed hump. "IN AN EFFORT TO ACCOMODATE THE NEEDS OF EMERGENCY SERVICES SPEED HUMPS, ARE NO LONGER INSTALLED IN THE CITY OF AUSTIN." ADVANTAGES: . Reduces vehicle speed. More effective if used in a series at 300' to 500' spacing or in conjunction with other traffic calming devices. · Can reduce vehicular volumes. · No restrictions to on-street parking. · Requires minimum maintenance. 10f2 5/22/2002 1 :06 PM City of Austin - Speed Hump wysiwyg://lllhttp://W\..W.ci.austin.lx.us/roadworkslhumps.htm ~ '-' DISADVANTAGES: . May divert traffic to parallel streets that do not have traffic calming measures. · Increases emergency response times. . Not esthetically pleasing. COST: Moderate ($6,800) '~Ø'/)"~'f"'" ~ )<'. ie·- . ',';:¡ it', -- "..,! \-.,' _ " _;/l "'':i:¿f~,~.,:_::''>· Austin City Connection - The Official Web site of the City of Austin Contact Us: Roadworks@cLaustin.tx.us or 512-974-7129. Legal Notices I Privacy Statement © 2001 City of Austin, Texas. All Rights Reserved. P.O. Box 1088, Austin, TX 78701 (512) 974·2000 20f2 5/22/2002 \:06 PM City of Austin - Speed Cushions wysiwyg:/I13Jhttp://ww.·.ci.austin.lx.us/roadworks! cushions.htrn \. """" II Find! Options -* AUSTIN!······ EI CITYCQNNECTIONm Speed Cushions Toolbox I Speed Hump** I Traffic Circle Chicane I Semi-diverter Curb Extensions DESCRIPTION: Speed cushions consist of either recycled rubber or asphalt, raised about 3 inches in height. The length of the cushion is about 10 ft. The spaces between the cushions allow emergency vehicles to partially straddle the device. ADVANTAGES: · Reduces vehicle speed. More effective if used in a series at 300' to 500' spacing or in conjunction with other traffic calming devices. · Can reduce vehicular volumes. · No restrictions to on-street parking. · Does not restrict access to residents. · Requires minimum maintenance. · Minimal impact to emergency response times. DISADVANTAGES: · May divert traffic to parallel streets that do not have traffic calming measures. · May increase emergency response times. · Not aestheticallv oleasina. lof2 5/22/2002 1:07 PM City of Austin - Speed Cushions '-' wysiwyg:/I13/http://wwv..ci.austin.Ix.us/roadworks/cushions.htm ~ COST: Moderate ($5,600 - $7,300) '<ø-õf'''' t-'.;¡. ,¢, . ,'~ ," ;¡, ,-'", , ,*1 " ::.} \..,.." c ~~·'2:,,;::tijl':// 20f2 Austin City Connection - The Official Web site of the City of Austin Contact Us: Roadworks@cì.auslin.tx.usor512-974-7129. Legal Notices I Privacy Statement © 2001 City of Austin, Texas. All Rights Reserved. P.O. Box 1088, Austin, TX 78701 (512) 974-2000 5/22/2002 1 :07 PM City of Austin - Traffic Circles wysiwyg:1 II Olhttp://www.ci.austin.lx.us/roadworkslcircles.htm '-" ..., I Find! . Options ------=- *------------ AUSTIN II········ El CITY COM'IECTIOH", Traffic Circles I Semi-diverter ¡curb Extensions Toolbox I ~peed Hump**[Speed Cushions ¡I Chicane DESCRIPTION: Traffic circles are raised landscaped islands constructed at the center of intersections. They are typically landscaped with ground cover, bushes and trees. Traffic circles require drivers to slow to a speed that allows them to comfortably maneuver around them. Motorists travel in a counter-clockwise direction around the circle. Traffic circles are "yield upon entry" meaning that vehicles in the circle have the right of way and vehicles entering the circle must wait until the path is clear. ADVANTAGES: · Reduces vehicle speed. · Reduces vehicle conflicts at intersection. · Provides equal access to intersection for all drivers. · Does not restrict access to residents. lof2 5/24/2002 9:28 AM City of Austin - Traffic Circles wysiwyg:1 1101h1tp:1 Iwww.ci.austin.Ix.us/roadworks!circles.htm '-' ...., · When landscaped, traffic circles improve the appearance of a street. DISADVANTAGES: . A minimum of 40 feet of curbside parking must be prohibited at each corner of the intersection. · May increase emergency response time. The construction of a mountable curb minimizes the impact to emergency vehicles. · Can restrict access for large trucks and longer buses, and may require that these vehicles turn left in clockwise direction (in front of the circle, rather than around the circle). . Maintenance responsibility, if landscaped. · Requires additional traffic control signs (8-16 signs) and pavement markings. · May increase conflicts with cyclist and pedestrians. · May divert traffic to parallel streets. COST: High ($13,300 - $21,300) .t-'ø·Ò ~ "'1"~ t: ~ :. .1 ',,- ,. '. ..". <':;~~':""J". Austin City Connection· The Official Web site of the City of Austin Contact Us; Roadworks@ci.austin.tx.us or 512-974-7129. Legal Notices I Privacy Statement © 2001 City of Austin, Texas. All Rights Reserved. P.O. Box 1088, Austin, TX 78701 (512) 974-2000 2of2 5/24/2002 9:28 AM City of Austin - Chicane wysiwyg:1112Ihltp:llwww.ci.austin.tx.uslroadworks/chicanes.htm \. ""'" ... II Find! Options AUSTIN ii······El CITYCQNNECTIQN~ Chicane Toolbox I Speed Hump" ,I Speed cushionsil Traffic Circle 'I Semi-diverter Icurb Extensions DESCRIPTION: A chicane is a series of two or more staggered curb extensions on alternating sides of the roadway. Horizontal deflection influences motorists to reduce speed through the chicane. A raised island is added to the center of the road to prevents motorist from crossing the center line. ADVANTAGES: · Reduces speed. . Does not restrict access to residents. · Minimal impact to emergency vehicles. · Reduces crossing distance for pedestrians. . Can be aesthetically pleasing, if landscaped. DISADVANTAGES: _ ra"rh....i,.J_ _..........:__ rY'Il ....... h_ _r_hihif._,.I lof2 5124/2002 9:28 AM City of Austin - Chicane wysiwyg://12/http://WW...ci.austin.lx.us/roadworks/chicanes.htm '-' ,..", . vUI U;:'IUt;; JClI "1I1!: IIIU;:'L Ut;; JI UIIIUILt;;U. · Maintenance responsibility, if landscaped. · May divert traffic to parallel streets. · May increase conflicts with cyclists and pedestrians. COST: High ($22,500 - $37,000) ''''¡''~8' ::¡ 'll;~ ... . 'I. :" .' ,,~! '. / \::~;, - -~./ >·,¿,,.l"o-?"'" Austin City Connection· The Official Web site of the City of Austin Contact Us: Roadworks@ci.austin.tx.usor512-974-7129. Legal Notices I Privacy Statement © 2001 City of Austin, Texas. All Rights Reserved. P.O. Box 1088, Austin, TX 78701 (512) 974-2000 20f2 5/24/20029:28 AM City of Austin - Semi-diverter \.,., wysiwyg:1114/http://WW''' <:i.auslin.lx.us/roadworks/semi-div.htm ..,,¡ . I Find! , Options ,EJ CITYCOf>lNECTION", Semi-diverter Toolbox II Speed Hump:*I§peed çushionsjl Traffic Circle II Chicane Icurb..Extensions · Restricts mo thin the street block for res · Reduces cut . More self-enforcing and aesthetically pleasing than turn restriction signing. · Reduces crossing distances for pedestrians. · Aesthetically pleasing. · In emergency situations, emergency vehicles can travel in the restricted direction. he semi-diverter is direction of traffic. for the rest of the DESCRIPTION: Semi-diverter is a constructed to app Creates a one-wa block. ADVANTAGES: DISADVANTAGES: · May divert traffic to parallel streets without traffic calming measures. · May increase trip length for some residents. · Curbside parking must be prohibited adjacent to the device. · May increase emergency response time as they maneuver around the semi-diverter. · Maintenance responsibility. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: . Bicycles are typically permitted to travel through a semi-diverter in both directions, including the restricted direction. 10f2 5/24/2002 9:28 AM City of Austin - Semi-diverter \., COST: High ($20,500) wysiwyg:1I14Ihttp://wwv.c:¡.austin.Ix.us/roadworks/semi-div.htm 'WI I$'rø·ì.SD i:l'\. ~ ,0 7l I.' ., f.-~ \ . - .. j ~;:,' ,.0:':;/ 20f2 Austin City Connection - The Official Web site of the City of Austin Contact Us: Roadworks@ci.austin.tx.usor512-974-7129. Legal Notices I Privacy Statement © 2001 City of Austin, Texas. All Rights Reserved. P.O. Box 1088, Austin, TX 78701 (512) 974-2000 5/24/20029:28 AM City of Austin - Curb Extensions wysiwyg:1117/http://u'WW.ci.austin.lx.us/roadworks/curb.htm '-' "'" I Find! Options ,ð-USTIN i················El err" C() \fl'lECTION~ Curb Extensions Toolbox I Speed Hump"¡ Speed Cushions J Traffic Circle Chicane ¡ Semi-diverter DESCRIPTION: The intersection is narrowed by extending the curbs toward the center of the roadway or by building detached raised islands to allow for drainage and bike lanes passage. ADVANTAGES: · Reduces crossing distance for pedestrians. · May reduce cut-through traffic. · Does not restrict access to residents. · Minimal impact to emergency vehicles. · Can be aesthetically pleasing, if landscaped. 10f2 5/24/2002 9:29 AM City of Austin - Curb Extensions '- DISADVANTAGES: · Curbside parking must be prohibited to adjacent residents. . Low impact to mid-block speeding. · Maintenance responsibility, if landscaped. COST: High ($16,500) wysiwyg:1117/http://'''WW.ci.austin.lx.us/roadworks/curb.htm "wi ~ø~ "«r~ ¡C ;~ ('- ,,':; 's" ,'/ "'-':',"" .:;:1 2 of2 Austin City Connection - The Official Web site of the City of Austin Contact Us: Roadworks@ci.austin.tx.usor512-974-7129. Legal Notices I Privacy Statement © 2001 City of Austin, Texas. All Rights Reserved. P.O. Box 1088, Austin, TX 78701 (512) 974-2000 5/24/20029:29 AM ',.-/ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ...,J Date: June 4, 2002 Regular [~ Public Hearing [ ] Consent [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMlTTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Agri-Science Education Center - Revised Interlocal Agreement with St. Lucie County School Board BACKGROUND: See C.A. No. 02-797 FUNDS A V AIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): AccountNo. 001-3715-512001-300 (New Positions) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the revised interlocal agreement with the St. Lucie County School Board for the Agri-Science Education Center, and authorize the chairman to sign the agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 5-0 ~~ Æ.-. Douglas M. Anderson r? I II' County Administrator County Attorney: fJf Coordination/Shmatures Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dcpt.: Other: Other : Finance (Check for Copy only, ¡fapplicable)' '-' ...., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA . . TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 02-797 DA TE: May 28, 2002 SUBJECT: Agri-8cience Education Center - Revised Interlocal Agreement with 8t. Lucie County School Board BACKGROUND: On May 28,2002, the Board approved a proposed interlocal agreement with the S1. Lucie School Board for joint operation of the Agri-Science Education Center located on FAA Road in the unincorporated areas of the County. During the same meeting, the Board also approved the creation of the Agri-Science Instructor/Leader and Vocational Agricultural Technician positions with fifty percent (50%) of the Instructor's salary and benefits paid by the County and the School Board assuming responsibility for the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the Vocational Agricultural Technician's salary and benefits and one hundred percent (100%) of the Agri-8cience Instructor/Leader's salary and benefits. The interlocal agreement approved by the Board contained a scrivener's error, however, which indicated that the Center would be paying fifty percent (50%) of the Vocational Agricultural Technician's salary and benefits. This error has been corrected and a copy ofthe revised agreement is attached to this memorandum. The School Board met in the evening on May 28,2002 and approved the corrected agreement with one modification. As recommended by the Superintendent during the meeting, the School Board will convey management, rather than ownership, of the Center's cattle herd to the FAA on or before July 1,2002. The agreement attached to this memorandum includes this revision. RECOMMENDA nON/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the revised interlocal agreement with the 81. Lucie County School Board for the Agri-Science Education Center, and authorize the chairman to sign the agreement. Respectfully submitted He~~ Assistant County Attorney 1 Attachment HY/ Copies To: '-' .I Concurring Staff Clerk Secretary Press Public 2 \.r """" INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT between ST. LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and ST. LUCIE COUNTY relating to AGRI-SCIENCE EDUCATION CENTER THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is made this day of ,2002, by and between the ST. LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, hereinafter referred to as "School", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "County". WHEREAS, the School O'Wl1S and operates the Agri-Science Education Center ("Center"), located on FAA Road in the unincorporated area of the County, for the purpose of providing instruction in agricultural matters to its students; and, WHEREAS, the County provides agricultural information and training to County residents of all ages through the County's Cooperative Extension Service; and, WHEREAS, the parties have determined that it would be to the mutual advantage of each in the best interests of both the residents of St. Lucie County and the faculty, staff and students of the School for the parties to cooperate in the funding and operations of the Center. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual advantages accruing to the parties and the benefits, promises, and consideration hereinafter set out, the School and the County agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, Florida InterIocal Cooperation Act. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no premises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained therein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. 2. PURPOSE AND INTENT. It is the intent of the parties: A. To maximize the use of funds and facilities for the Center and avoid unnecessary duplication of facilities and services. B. To jointly provide programs and facilities that are better than either entity could provide on its 0'Wl1. I \w- ..." C. To further the relationship between the School and the County in providing agricultural education to all residents of the County. 3. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. The County's responsibilities hereunder shall be as follows: 4. as follows: A. On or before July I, 2002, the County shall hire the following full-time employees to be assigned to the Center: (1) Agri-Science Instructor/Leader (2) Vocational Agricultural Technician The qualifications, salary and benefits, andjob duties for these positions shall be as agreed upon by parties. The County shall be responsible for fifty percent (50%) of the cost of the Agri-Science Instructor/Leader's salary and benefits. The County shall require a satisfactory background check, including fingerprinting, prior to the hiring of any employee pursuant to this Agreement. The employees shall be subject to the employee regulations of both parties. The employees will be jointly supervised and evaluated by the County Extension Director and the principal of Fort Pierce Westwood High School. B. The County shall work with the School to develop short range and long range plans, including goals, objectives and budgets for the utilization of the Center. C. The County shall store and inventory all equipment parts, materials and supplies, pesticides and other chemical compounds used in conjunction with the operation of the Center in a safe and orderly manner. The County shall maintain up-to-date records of all chemicals and pesticides used and/or stored on site. D. The County shall cooperate with the School in the establishment of an Agri- Science Education Advisory Committee for the Center. E. The County shall operate the Zoological Education Program ("ZEP") and provide instruction for the Future Farmers of America ("FF A") Program. The County shall be responsible for mowing the ZEP farm and the ZEP pasture. SCHOOL RESPONSIBILITIES. The School's responsibilities hereunder shall be 2 "-' ...; A. The School shall be responsible for fifty percent (50%) of the cost of the salary and benefits for the Agri-Science Instructor/Leader and one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of the salary and benefits for the Vocational Agricultural Technician. The employees shall be subject to the employee regulations of both parties. The employees will be jointly supervised and evaluated by the County Extension Director and the principal of Fort Pierce Westwood High School. B. The School shall convey management of the Center's cattle herd to the FFA on or before July 1, 2002. C. The School shall retain title to the property, improvements, and all equipment used at the Center. D. The School shall be responsible for maintenance and repairs to the Center and its agricultural operations, including but not limited to facilities and equipment. E. The School shall cooperate with the County in development and implementation of short range and long range plans, including goals, objectives and budgets, for the utilization ofthe Center. F. The School shall cooperate with the County in the establishment of an Agri- Science Education Advisory Committee for the Center. 5. TERM; TERMINATION. This Agreement shall be effective for a period of one (l) year beginning July 1,2002 and ending June 30, 2003. Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause upon ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other. This Agreement will be automatically renewed upon the same terms and conditions for successive one year periods unless either party determines to terminate the Agreement by providing written notice of the termination at least ninety (90) prior to the expiration of the current term. 6. AMENDMENT. This Agreement may be amended by written agreement of the parties. 7. NOTICES. All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing (including telex and telegraphic communication) and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed (airmail if international) by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested, and addressed to: 3 '-" ..,.; As to St. Lucie County: With a copv to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 As to School: With a copv to: St. Lucie County School Superintendent St. Lucie County School Board 2909 Delaware Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34947 Daniel B. Harrell, Esquire Riverside National Bank, Suite 200 1600 S. Federal Highway Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered: (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date telecommunicated if by telegraph, (c) on the date of transmission with confirmed answer back ifby telex, and (d) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 8. PUBLIC RECORDS. The parties shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other materials subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by either party in conjunction with this Agreement. 9. PUBLIC RECORDS. The parties shall allow public access to all documents, paper, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by them in conduction with this Agreement. 10. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign the Agreement to any other persons or firm without first obtaining the other party's written approval. 11. FILING: AMENDMENT. This Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, prior to its effectiveness. This Agreement may only be amended by written document signed by all parties and filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida. 4 "-' "-" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized officials as of the date aforesaid. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney ST. LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD ATTEST: BY: BY: Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS BY: School Board Attorney g: \atty \agreemnt\interloc\sc h 00 I. agriscience. wpd 5 '-' AGENDA REQUEST iltM NO.-ª. DATE: June 4, 2002 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Michael Rath. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-066, Widening of the Shoulder of Orange Avenue from Kings Highway to the County Line BACKGROUND: On May 29, 2002 bids were opened for Widening of the Shoulder of Orange Avenue from Kings Highway to the County Line. Seven hundred thirty-nine (739) vendors were notified, sixteen (16) bid documents were distributed and three (3) bids were received. The Public Works Department has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Dickerson Florida, Inc., in the amount of $1 ,861 ,582. Tabulation attached. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Account Numbers: 316-9910-599335-800 County Capital/Economic Impact Reserve 101002-41122-563000-42003 Transportation Trust/Unincorporated Resurfacing PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDA TI ON: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-066, Widening of the Shoulder of Orange Avenue from Kings Highway to the County Line to the low bidder, Dickerson Florida, Inc., in the amount of $1,861,582 and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. Staff also recommends the reallocation of funds from the Economic Impact Reserve account 316-9910-599335-800 and Unincorporated Resurfacing account 101002-41122-563000-42003. Funds for the unincorporated resurfacing account to be replenished in the Fiscal Year 03 budget. COMMISSION ACTION: [~lf-APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 5-0 CONCURRENCE: County Attomey:(X) / , I; .J *" y~?,..v- ~. (112)"- -', ¡ :k ~. ~~ Doug Anderson ~1'County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget (X) uo -tnf'r\C ~ Other: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) lÜ~ Originating Dept:: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only. if Applicable) Elf, 1/97 _.~ , ~- * z Z lÞ c: c: .., 3: š: š: c. OJ OJ OJ lÞ m m m 3 ;;0 ;;0 ;;a III 0 0 0 ::::I C. ." ." ." 1/1 !:!:! !:!:! (") - III C C 0 .., š: n rJ) c 0 -g 3 ;;0 0 Þ m (") ~ (") c: m 3: m rJ) < m z m z c -I 0 .. rJ) -I C :;; Cii m -I c æ . ~ OJ c: -I m c .~ (,.,l ..... Ø) ...... w cø <0 ~~ rJ)O mO -1_ c:0 ~s: ::!:!Z Þ" OJS: mG') ~m ;;om me: ~:::a -:::a l=;z "'en ::E:- ;'0 '0 < ;,~ '0 z m '» z ." Z en ï en -f 0 0 -a :::a æ 0 ::I: e: :::a » 0 0 en ï -f 1> -f 0 Õ - z 0 z 0 :::a . :u -En -En -En N ~ ~ OJ v '".Þ. Co co ~ (Ø .þ. C» C» C1I ~ m v (..., '0 C1I OJ C» 0 CO 0 N - (Ø 0 (:) (:) (:) 0 0 0 0 '( ~ -a 0 m z m m z m z - 0 ~ Z G') s: z 0 m ~ m ." æ -f N Z ::I: (Ø G') m N en 0 ::I: 0 0 N e: @ ï 0 N m . . :::a 0 0 0 -a ." OJ s: 0 0 ~ ~» z OJ:::a G') e:O m !Þ~en ~ :::!o:-l m OOï z Ze:e: e: enZO m ::I:~iñ ." :::a mOO 0 ~OO s: .s:e: ~ OJS:Z ëCñ~ Z G') oen N- en .0 ::I: Oz - C»m G') C»:::a ::I: en ~ -< d -f ::I: m 0 0 e: Z ~ C Z m ."'" ..." CONSENT ITEMS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING 05/31/02 F'7.ABWARR FUND 001 001140 001243 001249 101 101006 102 102001 102201 107 107003 111 115 118 140 140001 160 181 183 183001 183002 ') --~ 401 418 421 441 441802 448 449 451 458 461 471 491 505 505001 611 625 "'" ST. LUÇIE COUNTY - BOARD ..." WARRANT LIST #35- 25-MAY-2002 TO 31-MAY-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund Section 112/t-:?O/FHWA FY01/02 Childern's Environ. Learning Center Section 8 Grant FY 99/00 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Archeological Survey (Div. of Histo Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper River Park I Fund Sheraton Plaza Fund Paradise Park Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund SLC Housing Finance Authority Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-Co~nty Arbitration/Mediat County Capital River Branch MSBU Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities SFWMD N. Hutchinson Water Main NHI Util-Rene~al & Replacement Fund NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund SH Util-Rene-,·¡al & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 88,673.26 401.73 1,890.00 8,295.31 35,781. 34 6,071.00 336.56 1,835.62 160.66 16,421. 23 1,653.75 2,563.74 448.73 716.00 2,116.16 555.32 144.24 6,125.00 28.88 2.08 350.00 3,800.00 700.00 31,998.65 l,649.75 2,300.47 13,485.00 l,496.70 3,007.45 80.00 1,445.75 10,363.21 8,602.15 8,075.94 1,138.32 3,116.48 900.20 409.21 2,286.71 269,426.60 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,097.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,097.15 , '-'" AGENDA REQUEST ìltM NO. C-2-A DATE: June 4,2002 REGULAR [ l PUBLIC HEARING [ l CONSENT [Xl TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Michael Rath, PurchasinQ Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-065, Sunrise Boulevard at Merritt Ditch 60" R.C.P. Culvert Replacement BACKGROUND: On May 22,2002 bids were opened for Sunrise Boulevard at Merritt Ditch 60" R.C.P. Culvert Replacement. Seven hundred thirteen (713) vendors were notified, ten (10) bid documents were distributed and five (5) bids were received. The Public Works Department has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Sunshine Land Design, in the amount of $124,606.99. Recommendation and tabulation attached. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Transportation Capital/Transportation Trust! Local Option Culvert Replacement Account No. 316001-41131-563000-43017. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-065, Sunrise Boulevard at Merritt Ditch 60" R.C.P. Culvert Replacement to the low bidder, Sunshine Land Design, in the amount of $124,606.99 and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: .....7~ []J APPROVED [] DENIED [ l OTHER: ~~ Doug Anderson /!t:rr County Administrator County Attomey:(X) cpr '" Purchasing Mgr.:(X) ¡.,e- Mgt. & Budget (X) Originating Dept:: Other: Other: Finance: (Check tOr Copy only, if Applicable) Eff.1/97 -- """" DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 02-167 To: Michael Rath - Purchasing Director Don West, P.E. - County Enginee~~. Y\.. Barbara Meinhardt - Budget and Revenue Coordinator \,?.P.\ \ ,~:~ - Via: Via: -~..... ·v ..' èV From: Craig Hauschild, P.E. - Senior Project Engineer C¡JAI May 22, 2002 .,-,-... ,-_# Date: Subject: Sunrise Boulevard at Merritt Ditch 60" RCP Culvert Replacement, SLC Project No. 0139 (Bid # 02-065) This project will replace the failing 60-inch corrugated metal pipe under the roadway with a 60-inch reinforced concrete pipe. On May 22, 2002 bids for this project were opened in the Purchasing office. We have reviewed all five (5) bids received. The bids were checked using the unit prices that were provided. Some math errors were found in the bids; however they did not affect the bid rankings. Based on our review of the bids, we recommend award of the contract to Sunshine Land Design, the lowest complete bid, in the amount of $124,606.99. The following budget is established for the project: Construction: Testing: Reserves: TOTAL: $ 124,607.00 $ 6,000.00 J 29,478.00 $ 160,085.00 Funds are available in Fund No. 316001-41131-563000-43017 Transportation Capital - Transportation Trust - Local Option Culvert Replacement. attachments: Bid Tabulation Sheet Bid Summary Spreadsheet cc w/attachmenls: Ray Wazny, P.E - Public Works Director Michael Powley, P.E. . Capital Projects Engineer .. ~ I- Z W ::iE W U) ° 0:: an :3 WCD ZQ Q. O· W _N 0:: U)Q ~~e I- 0:: z::iEtC W ::»::iE. > 001- -I o°tjj ::J ° W~:t: 0; (3zU) ::J::Jz ° -100 Ii '0- - I- l- e u)LI.« CD 0-1 :t: 0::J ° o::tC I- «~ ë 0 I- :E In I- Q. æ Q 0:: Q W .. ::¡¡¡ N @ l- e:( N 0 Q Q 0:: N ~ C) ~ Z N W - N -I 0:: ~ ::J W 0 W ::¡¡¡ tC Z - W C) 0 U) z W æ W z z S W ::» Q. U) Q. 0 ...." ..... c W : o:i! -co tC:) Ø) Q Q Q ,... om Ø) C! C! Q CC! WW cD Q CD ....: co I-U Q an N ,... ~ Oii: CD CD co CO) ~ We.. ~~ ..¡ ~~ N~ N o::!:: N an CD Ø) an o::Z 'l'"' 'l'"' 'l'"' 'l'"' N 0:) 4ß- 4ß- 4ß- 4ß- 4ß- O~ C W rn [á ..... Q Q Q Q Q CC! Q C! Q Q . ....: ai CD Q CD 0 Q an N ,... ~ - CD CD CD CO) an tC ~~ ..¡ aê N~ Ñ N an ,... Ø) an 'l'"' 'l'"' 'l'"' 'l'"' N 4ß- 4ß- 4ß- 4ß- 4ß- . U Z - ~ Z 0 . ¡:: 0 Z Z U (!) - ::» Cñ ~ 0:: Z I- W..J 0 U) U) Ou. ¡:: Z 0:: 06 ° 0 0 zz ::» ° «0:: 0:: C -I~ I- W Z we( . U) Z W Z~ 0 UJ Z æ > -I- Z 0:: 0 « :t:o. - 0 u) UJ I- (J ::¡¡¡ Z :> (J W I- ::» « e:( Z..J -I -u. - UJ C 0::...1 0:: _ ::» '...1 I-u. «0 tC Zu. z- ::¡¡¡~ ::¡¡¡~ 0- O~ UJ< 00:: UJO 0- ZZ W «rn I-b:: ~ ::r:::ii: OW u)< :t:z ::»~ ::»:) Qs .¡..: u~ o::e.. -I:J: M .... r-- 01 .... In " c l!:! :) co " it: c I- W rn ¡¡: Õ F ~ ë 0 z z w rn w > W ::¡¡¡ jjj z ::) U U W ~I < 0 0:: e.. c rn :!!: 0 C C ~, U ãi ãi ,f!1 u. u. u. ~I 0 0 0 c: 0:: 0:: 0:: 11I1 e, w w W WI lD lD al "Ci :E ~ ;æ: 1: ~ ::õl - - ::2 "21 ""2 " y """"'" .<; .8 r3 8888888 8 n8 1\ 8 8 8 8 8 8 888 888~~88 l;; u~ggu ~ Ui ~~:;j~!tU~¡H! H~1J1JU ~ :i:;¡¡i¡:¡¡:¡¡;¡¡;¡ ;t "'" ;¡.... ;~""~vi 't.: ..: ~ a w ~ ; .g ~ Ie ~ ~ - ~ '" 1-'" ~ '" '" .. I 88888888~8888~~~~~81\~888888888~~88 ~ .. ~~~gâlª~!~~~:;j~~a~~s§~g~ª~~~~~2ga~j ... .. ~~ Ñ e aa¡;¡¡:¡ :;¡¡i;t æ~Sa:;¡ ; ;;;ta¡i; ~ ~ ~ s "'" ! " 8888888888888888888888888888888888 0 0 H ~~~â~~~~M~~~~~~ã~lã~~â~~~~~~~~~il~ ~ ;;~ w~~~ a§£~;w. ~a ~;;~a_w ; M Ñ I- '" .. J ;; ! 8888888888~888888888888888888888g8 ~ .. '!~ ~~~â~~~~~~~~fiãa~aãã~!~~~~~~~jã~~ã~ ~ ~ "'" ~~~ ;;~~ ~$! ~ ....;;;~~; ~ 8888888888888888888888888888888888 :5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i.~~~~!~~~~~~ã~~~~~ ,.; J! & III o i! ~~~~~~~awai~;a; ~; ~~ gW~QÚ~ ""';; ~ I- '" .. § 8 8 8 888 8 8 8 8 n 8ll 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8 8 ~ ~ M ë " 3 ~~~~~~~~~~ã~~~i~~ii~~!~~~~~~ãã~~~~ R Il sit :;¡~~~¡;¡~~:;¡ aa~;~ ~ ;~:;¡:;¡¡:¡¡:¡ ~; " 0: 8888888888888888888888888888888888 0 ~l~~~~~~~~~~~~~â~~~~~ã~!~~~~lsiljj ~ 0 H '" ~ ~~ ~ ~"!~;.aw ~. ~a s ~~;~ '" 1-'" ~ .. j ~ f 8888888888888888888888888888888888 " 3 ã~~~~~~~~~~~~ãi~~~~~~~~i.~g~iâaaãi i Sit ~ a~-~~~ ;~;M ....""'=....; ~~;~ ~88888888888~88~~8888~~88888888888 .. .. ~~ã~ã~~ã~~~~~~Rã~!!ã~~~~~~ã~I~~~I~ ,.; :ïl H ~:;¡~:;¡;¡:¡;¡:¡;~aa;~~; ~~ ~¡:¡:;¡ :;¡; ú ~ C I- '" <P .. § ! æ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8·~ 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 ~ ~ 8 8 8 æ 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ! " 3 ~~~g~~~~á~~g~~a~~!I~ág~~~i~gjâ~~ã~ ~ ¡ :Sit III ~~:~;~;~ ~;a;- a ;~a Q. a ~ ~t 'õ --------ê-N--'R~8N--~N~-----_M88N_ !Ii: & v ò! ,l! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5 :íì ~ i ~ j . J Ii i I ~ I I. ~- ~J~ ~ ,i. ] § iJJ11 I; i ~~ff ilf ~~II ¡ ijJ~j 0 ~ --I I III 1'1...· -f'l ! C I J . ~ ~ II!.¡f~l¡ I,llllillill;l lii¡lllil li" Irl~l]a"'i~ ~¡U H~Bj~l-;r!1 . ~ . :~ ~ I f i~lu lL~U ~~H f~ iJlB ëo " 0 ¡,; :! 1'; :! ~ :; ~ H p ;4 - N ~ P ~. ~ :::~lln~p~;':H:!~ .Ii ciEsg~~ R~~~N ~ ~ .J! ~ .. Ii --~-~--~ ~ ~ãããlii ~ ~ ~ ~ :; U ~ p ~ ~ 1= '" g ¡;; = " " .9 ã5 ~ .. '- '1' ~. '- n, .~ n 'U ,~ r,) ;:J o f'il " If) 'Co c: rn t '" e- o. '-" AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO. C-2-B " DATE: June 4,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Purchasinq Michael Rath. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-060, Rental of Construction and Industrial Equipment BACKGROUND: On May 8. 2002 bids were opened for the Rental of Construction and Industrial Equipment as needed by the County Departments. Four hundred seventy-four (474) vendors were notified, thirty-seven (37) bid documents were distributed and nine (9) bids were received (tabulation attached). Staff has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the award be made lowest bidders, by item, to multiple suppliers to ensure availability of equipment, as listed on the attached Bid Award spreadsheet. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available from the various Departments operating supplies accounts on an as-needed basis. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-060. Rental of Construction and Industrial Equipment to the suppliers listed on the attached Bid Award spreadsheet and authorization for the Chairman to execute the Agreements as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: '/~ --- A -Doug Anderson ,-IfT1 County Administrator ¡~- County Attorney:(X) v "" Purchasing Mgr.:(X) /-- {o-- , Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (Check i:Jr Copy only, if Applicable) Eft. 1/97 · "U Q) ee CD ..... ... Zg.CD OC~ O§.~ ~gg ~oñì - iii"X 03£ ::tJ~ ~ Sf~ g.5" 3 ::r '" ::l aO '" '" ¡¡¡ ... '" '" o o o ... '" '" o o o ... ~ -~ o o o o ~ o o o o ... w o o o o ~ o o o o o ... '" (0 o o o o ... co o o o ... w '" '" o o ~ "0 o o o o ... w o o o o o ~ ~ o o g '" .c c ~ <' ~ 0> 0 ~ ~. 7'5' ... '" '" o o :;00 5' ee ~ :;0 .~ CD 0 ::t 0 o o .... '" z '" 0> 0 ø: (:) o 0 ::l lJl ã1 ~ ~ ......... C 0 (Jl 0 » g OJ ., õ' ee Ul m .D c '6' 3 CD ::t .... ZS=CJ o C 0> 03R- -ucr::r mOo :;cò.~ ~ ~ x 03f;! ::o~ ã ~ 5~~ o ::r 3 OJ '" 0 acr g ~ '" .c w ~. :: 0> ~ :So 9' ... '" '" o o o ~ o o o o ~ m o o o ~ -..., ~ o o o '- en 010 OJ "'0 õì tu m -0 0 ~ -0 '" _ ::r '" ill Ö~m :::CErx o f;! ::r< 3 0> '" 6' ;a ....., ... '" ~ o o .... '" '" o o :;0 0 5· ee ~ :;0..... CD 0 :J 0 .-+ 0 o ~ o o o o ~ m '" o o ... 0> o (Jl 0 ;l. g 5' OJ ~ ª- ::r -", '" g (jl 0 o ... '" o o o ... '" o o o o ... 0> o o o o ~ "co o o o o ... ~ o o o g OJ o CD 0' -g ~ :;::. 0> row a~ z::E oS' ~ Õ> o o :;0 g 5' cc ... ~~ a g o o '" ~g¿¡g> m2:NC') ;::cON^ :þ 9l -I D3 .CD o....,~ :::cc.~(') 0''''0> ~ :3 ro ~g-& ~aãi" CD ~ ::E 0- S' ~. 1d 9'''' 9' c Q 3 ~ 0'6'6 , ~ 3 , 0> ~i5~ ... '" '" o o o ~ '" o o o ~ z -~ !!!. 0 õ' 0 ::l 0 lJl ¡¡¡ .... a ~ C 0 (Jl 0 » 0 o ... w '" o o o ~ Õ> o (J)~ 3 0 ~ OJ'" ., ~ o "co :T g CD 0 ¡¡¡ 0 .... ~ o o o ~ OJÕ> ., g cõ· 0 ee 0 VI ~~ ~. f\.) ~ ~ CD 0 ::t 0 ~ G'lõ> (Jl g m 0 .c 0 c -S' fA 3 ~ [ ~ o 5" 0 r> 0 ... ~ S::"g¡ ~g s::0 o ~~ '< "co !lOg en 0 o 0 :J VI þ. '< "C OJ 0> 0 0> o.rvR- O''''::r coo ~@~ '" 0 7~{ì z3!!!. og~ O::l -g. "ClD~ mO-~ ~~w ..,::r'" O~'" ::O~Q , ~r; ;:;:;0 o 3 c 0> ~W ... '" '" o o o ~ '" o o o .... w '" o o o ... '" o o o o ... ~ OJ'" ., g cõ' 0 ee 0 VI m... .D ~ C 0 '6' 0 3 g ~ 0 .-+ ~ G'l -..., (Jl g m 0 -g 0 "6' ~ 3 ~ <D "co a g 5' 0 r> 0 ... '" s::~ Þ b s:: 0 o o .... c. '" '< 0 !lO ¡¡: en 0 o 0 ::::l VI w o.t\J Q g' ~g'-R- :;coo::r ~ 8' 5' ~ 0-00 ;o-g~2:. ~ œ~. cn(J)= mOl :ro~ '<- w ~~ '.) ~ ~.o õ' ? 6' 0'33 ã3 0 t.l 0> C !ñ' ~ac: ~~"'O , ::E Q z -. 0 09'0 ... '" o o o o ... w '" o o o ... '" '" w o o ~ o o o o N õ~~ '-"'-0 :Þ:g.~ o ::l 0 g. o·m ë'ï <D 0 '< ~ Co) w CD S- a. ffi -a g .0 õï o _ ~ Šõl~ --:~o Z:3 -r; 000 053 "CeDOl mO-~ ;o::E"C ~S'o o~'" ;o;:;:;g ... w '" o o o ~ s::..... '" ~ 0 o s::o o o ... c. w '< "co !lO ~ en 0 o 0 :J VI ... ... o o o ~ '" o o o ~ G'l "~ (Jl 8 m 0 -g 0 -0 ... 3 w <D (0 a g 5" 0 r> 0 ~ '" o o o ~ '" zg ~ (:, õ' 0 :J VI ... (iJ ~ ;a.g cg eno ~ ... w '" o o o ~ -~ z ~ 2l b õ' 0 :J VI CD ~ a~ c ~ eno ~ ~ OJ ..... ::l.o <0 0 <0 0 lJl 0 m .c ... c w '6- (0 3 0 <D 0 ;a. 8 ~ (j) "g CA ~ m 0 .D C '6' ~ 3 N CD co 3. b 5" 0 51 ....,,¡ Z3QCD o 0 ~ 05'-" "'OéDg.5" mO-::lct> ~-:...oo bNreæ- ::Uõ""ù wen= ~8~ w g L~ ~s=^ 'õí 9' ~ a.3~ O'crc ~. "'0 ~~Q 7~8 ~ o o o o ... co o o o ... ~ g: o o ~ '" o o o ... '" co o o o ~ '" o o o z¡;- ? 3 :Il .. ~£ '< 1 :Il ~~ Z:g~ a "" 'D õ' ~ ::::l VI ., CD ::t :Il ¡¡:" g ~ 55 :;.j ~ !I: c 0 '0 a llO= H C" .. '" =0 < ::l .. - ~ ::!! ~ šl ca .. .. '< - '0 ~ :Il ~~ ~ l1) 6t rD' III - 10 '" '0 lJl ~ m .0 c -5- 3 ct> a :Il ~~ ::l .. -- ::l''o ~ ",¡¡: c 0 '0 a llO= H C .. rD e: ::0 < ::l .. - ~ ;¡! :Il .. ca DO DO '< - '0 ~ :;0 :J' ee :;0 CD ::t :Il ~~ :: !: "''0 ~ :Il ¡¡:" o a ::l .. :;.'; ~ ",¡¡: c 0 '0 a llO2' ~e: =0 ;;; ~ ~ -. " C <D .. " .. "[ õ' ::l l:D is z 9 o N 6 en o i Ãl C Z ." o Ãl 3: ~ Õ z lit"~ ... ... ,j 1m 0> z;:¡ 0"" O:Þ "0" mlO ~~ -1Q 01:0 ;00 0- g .., '" w Q .,. .... o o o I--- ~ '" o o o I--- .,. w '" o o o I-- .,. o o o .,. '" o o o - ... ( 3 8. Œ. '" '" w 3 ol o 0> o.n ~~ ",0 ",'" ':':Þ zS' 09- 03 "0'" m::l ~: -IQ 01:0 ;00 0- g .,. '" o o o - ~ '" (J)0 3 g 5=- OJ 9.~ ::TO CD 0 ¡¡; 0 I--- .,. o o o .,. '£. o o I-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o cõ' a o cg 0 - m I--- ~ 'ê.. ~ -õ' ~ o 3 '" a ~ b o _ 0 - - .,. !'=> o o .,. '" ~ o o - ... '" o o o ~ o o o o - '-' .... '" w o 3 Gl 8..gJ Œ.'tl ",m ~ol I 5 z@ 0- oQ' -0 mOl ~g. -1£ 0- ;os: o 0. Œ. .., '" w o .,. .... '" o o - ~ (J) ~ 3 8 5- OJ.,. a ~ 9' '" CD 0 ¡¡; 0 '-- ... o o o .,. '" !'=> o o ~ ~ z '" 1:0 tl) ~ <5" g g cg ~I--m ãl D ::l 'C 1:. - '" 'tl Vi 0 3 :Þ 8 ~ I-- z » ... '" '" o o - ... '" .,. .,. <0 <0 '" '" o 0 o 0 - ... .,. w w (J)~ z~ 3 g ~ g ~ 0 ::T~¡¡¡ OJ -Ell CD tA ..., '" <0 0.... :::l '" :7 ~ ..... 0 CDO Co ..,0 enD "'1--» ~ o o o o I-- .,. w o o o o - .,. ¡g o o o - COJ: "''< Wo. I õl z£ o õ' Ool -oãl mOl ~!f öQ' ;Ool o 0- g .., '" w Q 3 8. '" .,. o o o z » .,. co '" o o - ... .,. .,. '" w '" 8 z~ OJ8 8 æ. g ca" g -§r-cg S!¡ 1r ~ ~ ~ !:. ~ ...... po "0 o C 0 3 o (J)O CD _»_a. .,. w '" Z ¡; (J) !a 0 3 -§J'-5 .,. S!¡.,. OJ .þo. CD co "'0 .... 3. en b c~ :T o (J)O ~ '" -»- ìJ Q) co CD '" .,. o o o z » ... o o o .,. !'=> o o ... '" ~Ool @-og. '" ~ £ o.;þ- W-l a¡o~ :r?J~ ::;; 1:0 as: ~~~ "" 5' CD "'D C r:r <" ë:~ m 3 ;:¡, " !!t, .,. .... o o o .,. co '" o o ... '" 1:0 '" ::l. 0 lO 0 <g 0 m D ... " ~ -5" '"0 3 0 '" 0 a 8 .,. '" o o o ... .... ~. ~ en 0- ,g Z 0.... o(;j ri1::;; ~§ ~~ ~)( ::l Z 00 "" o §! õ' ::l ~ 'tl '" ~ ~ '" 0 o 0 b (:, o 0 I-- ... .,. '" '" mOJo CJ)0 ::!.~ 2. g ¡g 0 ~~f/J OJ'" m ...,....10. ..0 1S 0"0 E 0 st 0 "0 a CD ¡; 3 0 ¿¡; 0 g 0 I-- _ Z Z » » ~ co o o o - "0 '" o o ~ ~ ~ o 0 o 0 o a o 0 ~ ~ '" '" o '" (:) 0 o 0 - 'C ~ co 0 o 0 o (J)o o 3 0 -5 gJ~ o .", s= ~ CD 0 ¡¡; 0 ~ '" o o o o - .,. .,. .... .... o 0 o 0 o 0 ... w ~ '" g og~ ;:gQ-C" ~;g oà~ ;On'" ~Q g3 n 0 '" 0. !E.æ. Q ~ 2", " ~. ~. (6":T ;:¡, ~ co o o o ... N õ , 0> zo. 0'" z3~ ~~~ ~~I I~~ ~å~ ~gm 7 ª "<'" 'tl ~ ~;.~ eêmCD ~ '" o o o .,. '" OJ'" ..., 0 (Õ. 0 CO 0 '" ßI~ c "0 -õ" g 3 0 CD 0 a. z » ~ '" o o o .,. .... '" '" o ;0 0 5' lO ;0 ~ '" "0 ;:¡, '" o o o .,. '" o o o ~ .., '" o o ... .... '" o (J)o 3 0 ~ ~~ o "0 :f8 CD 0 ¡¡; 0 ~ o o o o ... ... 01:0 -00> mR- ~g 00> ::OKf n ::T 3 '" ;:¡, g' 1:0 o 0- g .., .., W ... '" o o o I-- ~ ~~ (J) ¡g 0 2. cn~g 1r... OJ c: ~ a ·cr?;g =T 3 0 CD (DO ën a.- .,. o o o ... .... '" o o - ... '" Z 8 f!!. õ' g ;0 ~-~. @ ~ :::c ø a.þ. CD (X) c8 :a~ en 0 0 :Þ 0 0 - ~ o o o o ... co .... o o - v 01:0 -og. ~g :Þ.., -I", Ow ;0- 3 o 0. Œ. .... m '" Q '" D " <' 0> m ;:¡, , Z o ~ ~ o m o '" o 0 o 0 r- ... .,. W '" o OJ'" 0...,'" o c2ï (:) o co 0 -'" m .,. ..c.,. 8 ~. ~ 030 o CD 0 - a. z » ~ '" o o o - ... ... W '" .., Z '" '" 0> '" o c; a 000 ::l -en CD ~ a "0 C 0 en co :Þ 0 o - .,. ~ o o .,. <0 '" o o r-- ... Z o ~s: I'V 2: Q m '" x .g £ <' ~ ~~ ::l . ï~ z'" oê 09- "0 -. m'" ~')J -I§' Or ;01:0 o 0- R ~ o o o o ~ ... '" o o .,. .... o o o ~ .... co o o o o 2;!_ ::l CO ::u CD ::l - ... ... W '" co 0 Z!'=> (J)¡; g. 8 2. 0 ::J r-s= .UJ ~.UJ CD~ ~ 3.~ at..> ~ Cb ~~ 0(/)O -.0 » '" 0 - - ... '" ~ .,. '" o o o ... .... o o o ... .... '" o o z lõ 1~?1 ~ 3 1"';1 c CD .. n ., i õ' ::l :ll '" " ~!. ... ¥ I ::u ::;' co ::u CD ;a. :ll :E~ '" Et '" - ,.~ :ll ;:'" o a " .. :rj ;: c 0 ..,,,. 110= 0= '" '" =:0 < " '" - -< ~ :ll '" oa II II '< - .., ill ;Jl :E~ en :;!. 3 "'''' § ~ 1:0 ª- ::T CD iil ;Jl ;:'" g S- -- :r.., ill ,.;: c 0 " ". IIO~ 011 ê:g: < " ~ ~ ;Jl '" " ~!. '< .., ill ;Jl :E~ Z = ~ æ. ~l õ' :;, '" ..., CD a. :ll ;:'" g ~ C Er.a (J) ill » ,.;: c:; 0 ..,... 110= 0= '" '" ::0 < " '" - -< :!! " Co> .. »J: z'< os¡. -nO !;Q G'l~ ~'" »" Zm 'f õ " - - - - - - - - lJ III to CD c..> - Co> Cl »J: z'< os¡. -no !;Q G)~ ~'" »:.. ZN o S " ~ :::¡ J: o lJ m ~ o ;0 ~ ~ --- ~ - - - - - ~ »J: z'< os¡. -no !;Q G)1ll ~i6 »0'> Zo S " ~ :::¡ J: o lJ m ~ o ;0 ~ - - ~ - - - - - N CD ~ :::¡ J: o lJ m ~ ;0 ::TJ: ~.'< ICe. ::T~ ~O 9.Q ~Ill """ "'''' ¡¡;-- '" .þ. ~'? ~g :::¡~ J:;:;: O::T lJ3 m S" ~ 3' -ie: 03 ;OCT 8 3 N .... 0(") lJiil m" ~5Il -i~ O,? ;oõ " <A ... .... 0'> o o ~ ~ ;,., o o o o ~ -::J to ;:0 CD 3. <A N "CD o o o o - ~ o o o o - - - - - - N '" ~. :;t zm o~ ~¡[ m-i ;02 ~s¡. ~ ~. :;t '" o c" o ~ CT 8 3 ::T '" cõ' :=: õ' '" )( ¡;; " '" õ' " ~ ::¡ J: - - - - - - - - - N UI N .þ. lJ ¡, ':'" e: "C :;l e: " '" ~ f' Õ " , Z o o lJ m ~ o ;0 - ~ o o o o - - <A "" o OJ "" o ::!. I\) o to 0 o to 0 _Ul m .c <A I:: "" '6' ll'l 3 0 CD 0 -3. <A to o o o o - <A <A o 0 a (:) o 0 - ~ ... o o o - ... w CD o 8 ;0 -.g' <A ;0 to '" '" " o ~ o o - - - - ~ ~ o o o - - t o o o - - - (") III '" '" ~ '" CIJ '" c: CIJ ¡;; !!i , Z o o lJ m ~ o ;0 ~ 8 o o ~ ~ o o o o r o 8 <A ... ... o o ~ ... N CD cx> en 0 3 0 :T- OJ<A a ~ :To CD 0 ..., 0 Ul N Co> ~à ""e: , '" zs: Oll!. Om ril8 ~:. oQ ;cJm o 0- g .... '" "" Q ~ - - <A OJ 01 o o - <A N 8 Z b ê: o 0 -ill ... ¡¡¡ ~ a o c 8 ~ - ... o o o ~ o o o o - - ~ o o o o 3 8. '" <A 01 o en~ 3 0 s: gJ~ o ..... ::T CD iil en 3 :T- OJ ..., o :T CD ..., Ul N N zm og. ~g m.... ~ë;j d~ ;cJ::T 01 S " ª- ~ õ g " '" '0 o ~ ~ 0'> 0'> o o - - ~ .... o o - <A .... '" o o ~ '" 0'> o o - <A <A Rl '" ... CIJ 0 8 ê. 8 _9' .... m ..... a ~ ë.n :T 0 ~ CD 0 b fj]" o 0 - <A ... <A o 0 o b o 0 - - <A "" zO'> et g õ' ::J Ul ëD ~ a æ: Co eno » ~...,; om» -coe: ~ @~ d:~ ;O~ã 3 Q N ... W 3 0'> o _. e." ~g. '" cx>'" ~ 5" iD 1<5 :;t 5õ' ~ N o o .... ~ o o ~ '" o o <A OJ '" o o ~ '" o o o <A ... 01 o o o ~ o o o o ~ cn~ 3 0 s: OJ ..., <A o "" :TO'> CD 0 ..., 0 Ul ;:0 5' to ;:or CD ~ 3. (:) o N Cl om» ~ g. t.5 ~g;, -i -. o....¡¡; ::c~~ o 3 Q ~ 3 cx> 8. S" ~g. '" cx>'" ~ 5" iD 1<5 :;t ðõ' <A ... o o <A ~ o o ~ o o o .... w Z '" 2a. b õ· 0 " '" ¡¡¡ ;2. !! c ~ CIJ 0 » 0 <A o o o .... 0'> '" o o ~ '" o o o ~ o o o o z::O o '" . 3 o m " ... 'S õ' " ::a CD 0" .. iil' '< - .... ~ ::a :lEg en::!: 3 "'.... ~ s: OJ ..., o :T CD ..., Ul ::a ;¡:CD g ~ -- ::r.... ~ ;¡: <: 0 .... cr go:: oS: 111 ~ ~g CD - ~ ::!! ~ ::a CD ~~ '< - ~ ::a ~g z CD it ~ ~-ë ~r ~ '" ¡¡¡ ;:. ::a ;¡: CD C g ~ ~ 9'1" ",;¡: c 0 .... cr goS N 0" ~ ::!: ::: 0 < " CD - ~ ~ ::a CD 0" .. it '< - .... ~ ;" ~~. ::a ~~ :: !! "'~ ;:0 5' to ;:0 CD 3. ::a ;¡:CD o ~ " - :;1 ",;¡: c 0 ....cr goS oS: e :e :0 ~ ~ ~ - n t; :. c.n;¡;¡ ~g 0<0 g ;;s- -I ~ ~ ~. w Q) :f iõ ;;¡.;¡: , III Z~ O!il °I 1J1ll m", ~Q, -I~ O· ;¡;¡Gl iii' c, !!!. ... '" c.n o 8 ". '" ZOJ O£ Oã: 1J/il m<D ~ .~ -10 Oll!. :xl~ ~ D .... I ~ ;;s- .þ. ... OOJ 1J£ mã: ~~ O· :xl à iil ". <D ... c.n <0 CJ1 b o ". o OOJ 1J£ mã: ~/il -I~ O· ;¡;¡ (") III ~ ~ ~ D .... 'f z o ... CD (") III @" -g ~ C'OJ ãr~ c'ã: <D 0 , N z~ O· 0(") ~~ ~-g -Iiii' O~ :xlC CJ1 I :e 9' ... CO C'OJ ãr£ g.õ: , /il ZeD O-~ 0(") 1J1ll m@" ~ "9. -1= o!!l ;¡;¡D '" .(") :e SO r '< ... .... C'OJ õ3"£ c'ã: <D 0 N ZeD O-~ 00 '0 III m@" ~ "9. -1= o!!l :xlC '" .n :e s: ... '" OOJ 1J£ mã: ~/il -I~ 0- :xl..... o ;;s- '" '(> ~ '< ~ ... ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 CJ1 0 0 CJ1 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 b b b b b b b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ... ... ... '" '" '" ...., 0 ~ '" '" 0 CJ1 b 8 b b 0 0 0 D '" Z ... ... ... ... ... <0 '" g ... ... CJ1 ...., 0 0 g CJ1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b b 8 b b b b 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... ... '" '" 0 '" 0 CJ1 b b 0 0 ... en D <D <D @ »I Z'< DQ- ,,0 S;:(") Glg ;¡:<D »- z~ '? Õ '" ... ". »I Z'< DQ- ,,0 S;:Q Gllll ~_ffi Z'" '" CJ1 ff '" ~ ::¡ I o 1J m ~ o ;¡;¡ ... '" ZéÕ ? 3 ". o o Gl z o »I a~ ,,0 S;:Q Gl~ ;¡:<D »-... z'" CJ1 ff '" »I a~ ,,0 S;:Q Gl~ ;¡:<D ».~ z'" o S- '" C <D .. n ~ "2 õ' ::> ~ ::¡ I o 1J m ~ o ;¡;¡ ~ ::¡ I o 1J m ;¡;¡ » -I o ;¡;¡ "'0 III ,..;C CO CD c 0 ~ ... ... ... ... ~ " C" .þ. ~ CJ1 ~ CJ1 go= CJ1 0 0 CJ1 li'~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 b b b b b b :=0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;¡¡ õ!. < " 1, '" .... .. l~rea £~ã)~ ~ ~ t "¿S'm C'" 2 ~ C 0' ~O' s.~ - , ¡ir z'" o OgJ "tic. ° ml'\)"""'IIco ;¡¡. '" ~ ~ ;"Rl O,,ª~ ;¡¡ C Ol ° ~~5 m :J 0. ~ o Ol 0. C)'" Ol .~ '" C) '" Ol ...éD ~~ ~ ." '" 0:> 01 i::> o <It 0:> 01 o i::> o ." '" o o o i::> o ." 01 o i::> o ." '" o o i::> o ~ o o o i::> o ." '" o o o i::> o ~ 01 o i::> o ." 01 ..... 01 i::> o ~ '" o o i::> o ." '" ;.., 01 o i::> o "0 III co ro tl'I ~ o o i::> o \w '" C> ~~~~~ m(..JmŒ.3. ~""'<om ....,Cr-JN~ 00'....0:>0. :;tJ a")" Q ~ ï '«"ß äooQ. £ ~ 6l-~ al¡g~~ o. C) :E éD ~ ~.»-i3 gS:(..J~ ~ 2 ~""I s.g:~~ ~ ~ .v Il:t.t-~ ti~~o <It ~ 01 i::> o ~ :... zg ea. (:) õ' 0 ::::l Ul ..... ... ro '" ::::l ·w .... 0 C ¡; C/lo » ... c.n o i::> o ... 01 ..... 01 i::> o ~ III '" :::1.0 co 0 co i::> '" 0 m D ... C '" -S" iv 3 01 '" 0 a 8 ~ o o i::> o ~ o o o i::> ;:0 0 ::::l' co ... ~~ ::::l 0 .... i::> o ." 01 o o i::> o ~ -.... z c¡ ea. (:) õ' 0 ::::l Ul CD ~ ag c g C/l 0 » ~ "w c.n o ;:0 i::> 5" 0 co ;:0 ~ '" 0 a 0 o i::> o ~ S::1:¡ þt; s:: 0 o o ." 0. '" '< :... ¡¡og C/li::> o 0 ::::l Ul :a- ... o "tI m ~ -l'< OOl ;:0 a g 0 'T1 0',,_' m a æ :a. m ts' ~ ~ ß £§'g- al2~ Q. C" QJ ~géD ~-a C"d;:= C éil Ol ~(j ;;' $2.~~ .Q.Q We.... zWg. 0<.n:J ... 01 o o i::> o ... W 8: i::> o ... 0:> o i::> o ." '" 01 o i::> o :a- m ~Q m,.,. ~% Ö~ ;:cg ~ ~ o o i::> o ~ .. ~:g 0 ~ ¡; ~ s::0 ~o o~::::l 0... co... c.", ;:oW '<:... (1):'" QOg 3.~ C/l i::> i::> o 0 0 ::::ll-- Ul ~ o o i::> o ." '" o o i::> o I-- <It ..... Z g Z ~ b e!- o 0 õ' iil-¡¡: [~ ~ ~..... r+ C 0 C UlO Ul »g» - ." 0:> o i::> o - G') i:n '- .ß1 c: '6' 3 ro a - £ '0 Ol " ~ '" Q. ë: ~. z o :a- ..... Q"cr ~~ Q.? jgC) C Ol ë:- CD ~-a CD == :J -Ol 7~ z-l 0C) 00 "tI0 mO ~ ~. d:T ;:c~ ':ï " ::r ... W c.n o i::> o ~ ... c.n o i::> o .... ... Q'ó' ~~ Q .~ '" C) .g Ol <" CD *~ a~ z-l O~ 00 "tI0 mO ~~ -l::r 0.... ;:C'l' 5' g. <It W 8 i::> o <It Z § a b õ'o ::::l !!¡ ... ro W 3.8 cg C/l 0 » ... c.n o i::> o <It '" Z g æ. (:) õ'O ::::l '" ëD ~ 3.~ c~ C/lo » t."'wI 00.'T1 '1J ~. 0 m(6~ ~- ? -lc.n og;:c ;oog -gtg. C :J -i c.", '" ~ Ol ~ ,?' £ ':-' '0 ~. Q ~.... , ~ ::r ôm ... .... 01 !=> o o <It o i::> o ~ c.n o i::> o ... .... o o i::> o ~ .", o o i::> o ... c.n o i::> o ~ .... o i::> o ... c.n Ol o i::> o ~ ;.., Ol o i::> o ... ..... o i::> o t ~~ QJ ~ n. ;::t! ~a ° Ol ; CD "ê "ª. ~. 5r œc, aC) z", 0.'" 0.... ;f¡g ~,;' -l0 05 ;:c~ :;; ." <0 01 i::> o ." '" OJ ..... ..... '" cõ' i::> co 0 Ul m .D ... c: 0:> '6' g 3 i::> (1) 0 a ... '" o i::> o ~ o o i::> o ." W Z g e '=> õ' 0 :J '" ¡¡¡ ... =- <0 C g (j'J i::> » 0 ... o i::> o ~ :g i::> o ... .... o o C/li::> 3 0 s: OJ... ..... <0 o '" 9'0 ro i::> ..... 0 Ul ~ o - g o ZéD ? 3 I c CD "' n ~ "§: õ' :::I ~ c" .. ¡r ... - ." !!l ;0 :l:~ Z 3 ~ ~ ~" õ' ~ ::::l '" ..... ro a ;0 3:" Q " " ~ ~ ;'~ » ¡¡: C Q ." .. 1>0= C Iìl .. = ::0 < " .. - -< :!! !l. ;0 .. l?i ... ~ ;0 :l:~ :. 3 ~ 'tì "'1 m D C 'Õ. 3 '" =- ;0 3:" Q " ai. ::r." !!l ~:sa .~ik ",3: C Q ." .. 1>0= N l?~ =0 < " .. - -<~ ;0 " c" .. ¡r ... - ." !!l ;:0 S' co ;:0 ro :J .... ;0 :l:~ " ¡r " - "'''' !!l ;0 3:" Q " " ~ ;''¥ ,..;¡:; C 0 ."eT lo= clìl ..= =0 < ::I .. :¡¡ -< -. n ... ... (J1 0> o 0 o 0 b b :;0 0 :;0 0 -5'-5' ee ~ co ~ :;0:.. :;0", lÐo> lÐo ;ao 3.0 b b o 0 - ... 0> 8 OJ g c5" - <5l >-- m .0 c: is' 3 lÐ _a_ en CI ZS: OllJ 0;<- -oc m~ rffi' o ~. ;;0- CD § ... ~ (J1 '" o - ... (J1 o o '" o ... ~ ~ a. o '" o - ~ o o '" o .... '" o o '" o f-- ... (J1 g z o e o 0 >--1il ... ãl ~ =- .... c ~ en o » ~ ... 00 o '" o ... '" o o '" o - ~ '" o o '" o "tJ Q) co lÐ (J) ... ... (J1 o '" o UI lD r- .!ï .þ. o [ ::T CD lÕ" ;r ZS: OllJ 0;<- -oc m~ $!"> -I~ o oj' ;;0- CD o o 3 r- ~ ~ [ ::T CD lÕ' ;r ... ~ (J1 '" o - ~ o o o o ... '" o o '" o - ... .... ~ z 8 o llJ 0 b c b 000 -1il ~ ; ~ ;a m c 0 ~ ~ o w .... '" '" ~ .... g: o o >-- ~ o :õ r- -0;:+0 m:J'"~ ;;o~CD ~~~ °t~ ;;0:1'" ~~ '" Ñ' 0 CD 0 0.3 9:0- ~. ~. ::) t:t. <0 g 0" " c: " ~ "'0 5a.a. . z.... 08: ~ .... o g ~ (J1 o '" o ... '" CD o o o ~ o o '" o ... '" '0 .... o '" o ... (J1 o o o o .... (J1 OJ 0 .... 0 ccï g ee CJ> m .0 ~ c: '" is' (J1 3 g lÐ 0 ::J .... ... (J1 o o ;;0 8 :;' <0 ;;0 ~ ~ ~ o '" o ... z~ o b 3: 0 Q) x ~~ c: '" is" g 3 0 lÐ 0 a UI ... CD :õ r- .g s: lil <" C. llJ ~ CD 1ÐC¡>- ;t~~ ~-rQ) z :;' g: 0§.l6 0"'0 -0 Ñ' m:g,~ $!o.~ ëJ~' ê, ::0 5' g <0 - O"~ c: 0 ~a. ~(J1 o 8: ... '" 8 o o ~ o o '" o ~ (J1 o '" o ~ (J1 o '" o ~ 0> o o o r o '" o r o o o :;00 5' ee :;o~ lÐ ~ ag ... .þ. ~ ~ US' b 'fÈ 0 m LJ c: "6' ¥.þ. 3 0 CD 0 :a g UI en -Ir- 010 .þ.!i :E CD ~àì ~llJ ~~ ~. l6 ~o 00 O§. -0 :;' mllJ ~g -I? 0-1 ;;o~ OJ 3 ~ ... ... w (J1 o o ... (J1 o '" o .... ~ .þ. o o ~ ... .þ. o o o en 3 ~ gJ~ o '" .... 0 160 ¡¡¡ g ... (J1 o o o o ... .þ. z~ ~o õ'o ::J CJ> ëÞ ~ ::J :.. .... 0> CO eno »0 r z ~ §. g ãJ x ~~ c: W is' g: 3 '" lÐ 0 a UI UI ß¡rQ:£ ::. :T Õ '0 < - ;1;. ~ ~w::::J~ :as?co_ t ~ C" 0 z~Q.!i °OCD~ o~lñO" ril W I c: ;;oc¡>...~ ~~. ~ ~ 0::T :;'llJ ;;OllJ~à '" ~b OllJ m~ r~ ::T" CD '" ~::T ~l6 ,,' 0 CD ~ ~. g :Tet e,.) õ' ~_':J ... 0 '- æG'O::::Jgo ~~'(D!2:3 :g,,;:rS,"o '" :T 'õí g: o .þ. CD a. ãl ~ ~ Ol '" o ... .... o o o .... '" o o o o ... (J1 o en 0 2" 8 :T CD ~ a - g ~ CD (J1 ø g o ~ o o o o ~ '" (J1 '" o ... (J1 o o o ~ W en g ~. 8 :T OJ'" .... W o '" :T 0 lÐ !:I .... 0 CJ> 0 ~ :.. .... o ;;0 0 :5" 0 <0 ;;0 ~ CD '" ¡;¡. 0 o '" o ~ z~ o 0 3: g Q) x m... .0 W c: -..... is' g: 3 '" lÐ 0 ::J .... ~ ( ) ~ ~ .g§.a <' 0" :a llJ ~ ëD_~ ~ @" c. I 9' r z 0 ow!i ~ g.~ ~2:(") »"llJ -I '< or o ~ '9. ;;00.; ~ £ '" 'C W llJ 0> C. m ~:õ o § ... w '" o '" o .... g: o o ... (J1 o o o o ... w '" o o o v zr- olil 00. -o~ m" ~~ -1RJ OGl ;;0- 5' éD <0 OJ [ -I o Q. (") ~ ~. >-- ~ z'O Z 0 g: ª ;;ro o Q) 0 ¡¡P__x ..., -EIt m-EII lÐ.þ. .0 w :Jw c1v - 0 -. 0 c 0 "0 0 ~ 8 ~ 8 -a ... (J1 .... (J1 0 o '" 8 0 - s: Þ s: R- '< I/O en o :I '" - - ~ en m- .0 c: is' 3 lÐ a - UI N OllJr- -0:10 mC.~ ~ c._~ -I¡S(") o~. IU ;xJ <5 CD -g ~ ñf o.~ -CD Q ~ ~ m o - o :õ -g: ~2 CD 0" 0" , ~ ... w '" (J1 o o ... w o o '" o ... to o o '" o ... w '" o o o o ... (J1 o o o ... ~ (J1 o o ~ -." o o '" o ... w W (J1 o o o ~ o o '" o z @. 0", z.. !' 3 c CD Ul " ... "§: õ' :I ~ 0" .. or ... - " ~ OJ .... cõ' ee CJ> m .0 c: is' 3 lÐ a '" :lE~ " or " - "''' ~ '" 3:" g ! :rj 3: c 0 " .,. ",æ ot: l'Þ e: =0 < " ~ ~ ~ '" " ;'~ ... - 'i ~J&.: '" :lE~ z "it ~ !&-.; g' ~ '" ãl ~ '" ~~ c "i en So" » ~ ,..3: c 0 ".,. ~[ " ... =0 < 2- " " o<!* '" " 0" .. it '< - " ~ :;0 ::J' ee :;0 lÐ ::J .... '" ::æ~ " it " - "''' ~ '" 3:" g ~ So'; ~ 'e ~ ,..3: c 0 " .,. ",æ ot: ~g: ~ !ij o<! ñ' ... ... . 000 "'tl o. m'" ~g --¡,- ~? c.> o â :r CD rõ' ¡t CD m ('l s: ('l ~ m '" b o - ... N '" N b ;;00 :ï co ;;o~ CD g 3. 0 o ... C> OW '1J ü)" m", ~Q --¡,- ~.;:¡; N c¡:> õ' S- :r CD rõ' ¡t CD m ('l c;- i'ï z o ... ~ b o I-- ... N '" o b ;;0 0 - 5' e-- co ;;0 CD 3. I-- ~ o o b o ~ ... o b o I-- ... '" '" '" b o - z !!!. õ' :> en ¡¡¡ ... a m C ~ ~ g I-- ... N '" b o - - "'0 Ql co ( ) ...., - ... '" .... '" b C o CIi 1--» ." N '" b o ... CD o b o e-- ... N z.... to OJ 0 ::I. e 0 (Q o 0 ~ iil e-- m êi).... -ê 3. ~ -e' c 0 3 ~ g å r--- ... o b o ~ '" o b o I-- ~ ... m b o I-- ;:9. =' co ;;0 CD 3. ... '" '" o b o I-- ~ g b o z o ~,., ... '" z g: 9!. '=> õ·o =' Ul CD ~ :ag o b o 0:;:(") "0"'0 m;<'3 ~'"O CT", CD ('l d~Q ;0.0. ~ ... o b o ... '" o b o ;0 Q. ~ Q Co> c¡:> CD S' .c ('l " :r ~. c. ãjg 3.~ 0. z2 O~ 8l :> ;0 cgº- ë;; ~~ o -to ;00 ~ ~ c.", 00... 0... ;31" ,(") z'" olii 0"2. ril!f ~(') --¡OO ot:; ;Olil o ... N o o b o ... m zg æ. 0 õ'o =' Ul ëù ~ 3.~ C ¡; Clio » ~ '" o b o ~ '" o b o ... m Ul o b o ~ ë:D Ul o b o ... g: b o ... '" m o b o ~ "0 ... Ul b o ... N '" CD o b o ~ o o b o ~ III m .., CD cëï g co Ul ,g¡~ c: -.... 'Õ. ~ 3 b ( ) 0 3. ... Ul Z 0 '" 0 c:: b o 0 :> '" tÞ ~ % w 5i S » b o ;;0 5' co ~ ;;00, CD 0 3. 0 b o Øl ... 05. ;0 "OCTO mea= ;o",g¡ » :> - -f ~ en °to!! "o~ 31:l '" 0 "'1jl :Þ:~ N. ~ f.{l CD õ .c :> " ~. ~. ërCQ. ¡?CD '0. z2 03 ~ Ul m is ... ... o b o ~ ... '" b o ... ... '" o b o ~ '" '" b o ... Ul N Ul b o ... g: b o Øl Øl 0-;0 "OõlQ. m~(þ ~ '8 -~ -f~;:+ ...... o ,!,. ;o¡;rg '" ~ 5: to 5' CD'" ~~ CD "0 ~ CD §3 'li. ~:T 0_ :'E !i!. I~ Z Oõ ... ... '" b o ... N N CIi '" 2. g s: Ill... a ¡:j s: '" CD b iil 0 ... '" o b o to :>. '" '" en m .c " .¡, 3 CD a Z Ql ... Õ· =' Ul (þ 3. C CIi » Øl '" ~ '" Co> b o - ... .... z~ ~ 0 õ·o ¡¡¡- ëD ~ at C ~ Clio »~ ... ... '" b o ... '" .... o b o - ... ... N o b o - ... !" ... m o b ~ - ... '" o o b o - ... N 0, o o b o - Q ;0 Q. ~ .~ <" en '" CD ro:::;:; ;a.-6 , i3 Ô~ oll ril5. ~~ d .g' ;0< 5' i3 (') ~ Ul ... ... o b o ... Co> '" o b o ~ :r¡: CD '" fÕ" ~ ;r , ,- z;:¡; O' 0» ~ ~. ~~ --¡to 08 ;03 ... CD g b o - ~ (0 zg: !. (:) õ' 0 =' - Ul .., ... CD '" 3.1;5 C p CIi 0 »~ I ....1 :r¡: CD '" cõ' * ;r ''- z;:¡; O' 0» ~ ~. ~~ --¡to 08 ;03 Øl '" ,- ~ ... ... o õ' o ... (J) ... '" b o - ~ z¡: 0'" O;¡. ""Cc m~ ~). --¡CD o ãj' ;0- to 8 3 ,- .ª' ... o o 8' ... m '" o b o - ~ ,- -ª' CD o [ :r CD rõ' ;r ... '"-.J :,. ~ Zg 28 0 52.0 ªo 8 õ' 0 0 0 ;:9. ='-='-=' ~ø ~tIt <O~ ~~ ~b ;;0 -0 -0 CD cP cP 3. CliO Clio »~»~ ... ex> o b o ~ "0 o o b o - ... N (0 00 g [b ;0 :y ~~. to... ~ a _~ tÐ 5' '" :> (t) g - ¡¡¡ b ~ ~ '" o b o - G) (J) - m .c c: 'Õ. 3 CD 3. - ... CD o b o ~ "0 o o b o - ... N 8 o b ;0 ~.g' ... ;0 .'" CD ~ 3- o b ~ ~ '" o b o - - - ~ o o b o ... S o b o - ~ '" 8 b ~ ... Co> '" o o b ~ ... CD o b o - - - ..... o o b o e-- ... '" '" '" b o - ... CD Z ... OJ Ul cr. (:) o 0 iil- @ ~ a (0 c Ul 00 0 » b ~ ... CD o b o ... N '" o b o e-- ... CD g: III a ::!. o co e--C¡¡¡ m .c c: 'Õ. 3 CD =' - ... ~ z¡: 0'" O;¡. "0'- m~ ~). --¡CD o ãj' ;oëii 8 3 ,- .ª' m o õ' s- :r CD rõ' ;r ... '" o o b o - ;;0 -5' co ;;0 CD 3. ~ o o b o ~ (0 '" o b o ~ '" o b o Z¡;; !' 3 o CD III n ~ -g õ' ::J ;u CD a" .. ¡; '< - ." ~ ;u ~;g :: ïr "'''' ~ í!, 00: ¡!!Ii' ~:, i~ iGíf; lI' ~, ;u ;:CD o " " ïr 9-." ~ ;: " 0 ." '" llO= a[ CD _. =0 < " .. - .;æ ~ ;u CD ~è- '< - ~ f' ;u ~;g z :: ~ a ~-a §f ~ en ¡¡¡ a ;u ~[ C :s!!. 00 !f-." » ~ ,..;: " 0 ."a- ~[ CD c:l: =0 ~ it .;æ;¡! ;u CD a¡>' .. .. '< - ~ ;u ~;g :I i: "'''' ~ ;u ;:CD o " " ïr !f-." ~ ,..;: t: 0 ."a- llO= at .. ~ =0 < " CD :¡¡ .;æ- n , "'tl III CO ( ) CO '" . '" .... o o o '" N (JO ° is '" .... o o o o '" .þ. o o o .... N (JO o o o .... (JO (JO ° is ~ -.... o o o o ~ o o o o '" N o o o o '" a> ° o o o ~ Ò> o o o o .... o o o Olll-i "'C:J@ mo'", ;o9,::J' »",'0 d~~ :::c cC :0 CD a> :::r ~. o :0 ~~ Q ~ CD III .00' e: ëÞ ~. '!!: ëÞg a", , e: " z'" 0!5 '" C> Olll-i "'C5.åJ m '" $:a.::J' -i ~" -g 0::J'3 ::0 cã :0 CD f' 5" :; ~ .g. Q ~ CD III .0 0' e: ëÞ ~. os: ëÞ ". a:T .... (JO o o o ~ z g; a is õ' :::l IJl ëØ r 3. g Co c/)o » '" o o o .... a> (JO o o .... ~ o o ;0 ° :;' 10 ;0 '" CD a> ¡a :5 o o .... o o o ~ .... a> o o .... ~ tDoo C§' g co '" ß1~ l: - _. (JO '0 ~ ~ is 3. .... '" (JO o o o '-' ;.: '" , e: " z'" 0!5 09,-i "'CcnãJ mg.~ ~a3"O oCDe: ;0 ::J' ~ O' '" CD 't' :;' g .g. jg !i. ~. g !!!.'" CD e: ag o , :0 '" '" o o o ~ z :5 æ. b õ' ° :::l '" CD ~ a ~ Co c/)o » '" o o o ~ o o o ~ ~ ~ tÕ" b <g ° m .g '" -s- w 3 g¡ CD 0 a ° '" '" o o o ~ 3 CD Cl '< :::l III 3 C'i" '" Zlll o is. ~ z:5 æ. b õ·o ::;¡ '" .., .... CD to> a ~ Co c/)o » '" ... o (J) 00 3 0 s: 0 OJ g. ~ ::J' N CD .þ. ø 0 o .... '" 09,-i -ocn@ mg.~ ~ a3 u oCDe: ;0 ::J' ~ o . '" CD ':-' :;' !;¡ .g. ~ ::J' .... '" o o o '" o o o .... '" a> o o .... '" o o o CD .0 e: ~. ëD~ ag o , :0 Zlll o is. .... .... 09,0 ~ ~~. ~~~ ~ca ~ OCD3 ;0 ::J' '0 o e: '" 3 CD~ ~ Cf :;" CD .g. .0 e: ~ ~. s: ëÞrn ac: \l , g" Zlll o is. .... to> o o o ~ z:5 etb õ' ° :::l '" .., .... CD to> a ~ Co c/)o » '" o o o .... '" O"J o o ~ o (J) 00 3 is ~ OJ à ~ ::J' N CD .þ. ¿;; 0 o '" <oJ o o o .... en 09,0 "'C en ßj" gjg.-g. »~¡;¡ -i lO lO o CD 3 ;0 ::J' '0 ~ 3 CD~ ~ ':V :;' CD .g. .0 e: ~ ~. s: ëÞrn ac: \l I õ' :0 Zlll o is. '" <oJ o o o ~ z:5 !! 0 õ' ° :::l '" .., .... ( ) to> :::l (JO .. 0 Co C/) 0 » '" o o o (J) ~ ::J' OJ a :T CD ¡¡¡ .... '" 09,(J) "'C(t)õ mg.~ ~ u3 ~ OCDe: ;0 ::J' ~ o' '" CD '?' :;' g? .... N .... N o o .... ~ z (JO !! 0 õ' ° :::l IJl .., '" CD N :::l '.þ. .. .þ. c ~ C/)o » '" <oJ (JO o 8 ß ~ e: so ~. (6"0 ao - , CD S. z 00 .... '" '" ~ g; 3 0 ( ) Cl '< ~ :::l -.... ß) 0 3 0 ~. is .... .... 09,(J) '1JfJlÕ mg.~ ~ ~ '0 OCDe: ;0 ::J' ~ o . rn CD 9' :;' ~~ ß '!i. =.~ < ~~ a:5 .... N ¡g o o ~ o o o o .... ~ o o o '" O"J O"J o o o ~ 'co Q) o o o '" to> (JO o o o ....J ,¡;¡' s. z 0° ~ . N o :;c 0 S' co :;c~ ( ) g; a 0 o '" (JO ~ ~ 3 0 CD 0 ~ ~ III "N 3 .þ. ~. b o 09,(J) "'C(f)õ mg.~ ~tå ~ OCD~ ;0 ::J' '0 ¡;¡ <oJ CD .¡. Q ~r ?' ß ~ ~. § III me ao ,¡;¡' s. z 0° '" .þ. <oJ o o '" (JO o o o ~ 00 (JO o o '" <oJ (JO o o o '" <oJ Z :5 !! 0 õ·o :::l '" .., .... ( ) (JO a ~ Co C/) 0 » '" » ~ o b ~ 0 ~ ~ III 0 3 5l ~. 0 o .... N Z¡;; ~ 3 O(J) -¡¡ o. mrn ~Q -i,.... 0-' ;0 .:::> .þ. o [ c CD '" !¡ i õ' :0 ::J' CD lÕ' .::!: CD ëÞ ¡;¡. õ" ,,", ; z o .... N o o o o ,; ,. ~~ '< i 11 ' ,; =:!! :: i. "'''' ~ ,; ¡:" o " " i. ~." ~ ~ o o o o !: c 0 ... cr go: o~ ~õ < " ,. - < ~ .... N .þ. (JO o o ,; ,. 0" .. S' '< - ." ~ ;JJ =:~ ,. S' ,. - ,..... ~ ,; ¡:" o " " i. ~." ~ '" N (JO o o ,..!: c 0 ." cr ~[ " '" =0 ~ it < ;l! ,; ,. 0" .. S' '< - ~ ,; =:~ .. S' " - ,..... ~ ,; ¡:" 0" " i. ~i ;m, ,..¡: c 0 ." cr go: 011 " '" =0 < i!. " "II < - n · .. c -. 00-1 ""C::+c¡; mg.fl ~~'" -1 (') ~ 0"'., ;ll",:J ....0. o O~ Q ~ CD :: -ê§ ,;:- ., ~ ~6i -.:2 ~ ... o o o r \) o o o ~ Ï\> Ol o o o ... ... o o o ~ .... c.n o o ... Ol c.n o o o ~ ..... 8 o o ... o o o '1l III co ( ) (!) '" z;:+ oJ!- co .. , 0-1 Ôg~ o::g. -. '" rilg:~ ;ll \)., ~~5. 09 ;ll3[ 8.~ ~:: ~§ 03 g ;, '" 6i .g.:2 ~. =: ~ .§: ~ g: o o ... ffi en 0 2.8 9' ~~ o '" :fg ( ) 0 iil 0 ... o o o z ., E:!: o :J '" ãl a c en » \...,r co co Q ~_. -I '" iil .c ~ ::I c: g. ~. :e ~ mS'o< a3~ ':::T Z -. o~ g- o",n "'C -. ~ m§:g ~"o9'. O""¡¡; ;llg.g. ~. 3 g:~ ... ~~ 00. z !! õ' ::J CJ> .., ( ) a c en » co .... "'!2:3-1 ~~~~ !"!" ~ n 20) ffi 01 ::::;.., o N~" "IJ ~j' .g. ~. mg.",5' ~::~~ ~--ã3§. oo.ccr ;ll£B'~ "C cr c:: Ol ~ iil ~ Ol·'" Oà~ gO'~ ~., -. \l- =; g.2!§ ~ g o o ... ffi o o o ~ '" o o o o ... o o o co '" ~"-I O:lm ~a.~ _n Q ª. ~ ,g ~.~ ~ ~. ~ ~:T;¡:: :J <7 - 2. ~ z = " o~ 0. o",=; ril""S' ~J!-2 d~g: ;llg.~ ~. ... §:~ ~ ~ \) o o ... '" z ~ 9t 0 õ' 0 ::J CJ> .., ... ( ) to 3. ~ Co en 0 » ... ... o o o ... to c.n o o ... '" g o o ... to .... c.n o o ... \) o o o co c.n Z-l Oiil -Ill ~ .Q -... fTIo ;ll.g- Z ~. 05' 0'" "IJ-c m + ~~ -In 0::T ;ll~ 0. "IJ ~ Þ ~ ~ \) o o ¡--- ~ 0=1 rilm ~~ d~ ;:0 Q iil 3 't:l ... '" o o o ¡--- ~~~ - ª. ~~ ~ Õ :J O'~ ~ ~. ~ ..~ g '" .8 S c: :J ~. m~ =-0. z'" 03 0., "IJ)( mm ~~ 00. ;ll", c: rò '" Z o ... '" o o o ¡--- ... ... ... ... .... .... t:; c.n Z c.n z en2. 0 en3 8 !! 8 !! o _. õ' õ· 9'¡---9'¡---¡¡¡¡---::J m... m .., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m o~ o~ ::Sf\) a if~ ~g; cg; c iilo iilO eno en - -»r---» ... ... o o o ~ '" c.n o o - ... '" z g z ~ (:, ~ õ· 0 õ· iil-iil a!! æ a % :... c g: ~ 0 o - ... c.n o o o - - - ... o o o - - c ~ - - - - ... o o o ... ... o o o - ~ 8 en 8 2. 5' -CD o 5' '" ¡¡¡ ... ... o o o o - ... ... o o o - - - ~~~ Q :T_~ m""", ~ .g. '? ~.....õ CD.O> Sl "'00. Ol 0", '" 0 n '" '" ~-c- , 0 to zc:q> o à 5· OVlg. "IJ£=; ~alã: »n'" d~ ~ ;llriif ~~ z¡; !l 3 c (þ '" n ~ i õ' ::I ;0 .. c" AI it '< - 'C ill ;0 ~g <D it <D - "'1 ;0 ;¡:g o it ia- :r'C ill ;¡: c 0 'CrT IlOS c&l .. "" =0 < :J ~j! ~ &' c" AI it '< - 1 ;0 ~g; .. it .. - "''C ill ;0 ¡:<D g ~ -- :r'C !!l ",¡: c 0 'C rT SlO: c &l CllI ~ =0 < " .. - -< :!! n ;0 .. cia AI AI '< - 'C ill ~! ' ;0 ~ g :¡ ~ "''C ill ¡¡~f '.S': -'. ~..,;; ,M 'tJ. !!\~;,""V ;0 ;¡:<D g ;. -- :r'C ill ",¡: c: 0 'C 0- SlO: i~ =Q ~ it -< :!! n . ... .. .. ~ O.þ.-i ;¡;:î~ ~"':; 6ël'~ ;:o!2.Q iD !l. ª :7 3'~ ~~ (I) œ. ~ ª. Õ iD~ ~ ¡¡¡ :J '" ðg 1) Ol co CIl .... o :g~ !!!. ~ -i m", ':il ¡¡¡ . '" 0 g ~!2.-i tDæ~t ~~~ .'< Z.8 ~ Oc::~ O'Õ' g ;¡;:~Õ ~;a@ ~Õ~ 0<"0 ;0.,0 ::l. ;::¡. g ~ '" :J. 0' g C'''' , '" CO 00 ;¡;:~ ~"O -i-i 02 ;o~ o :¡= ;0 !il a. ... '" <0 '" o o - ~ '" '" o o o - ... '" '" '" o o o - o w o o Z o '" ... 00 "Oc:: m3 ~"O -i-i o~ ;o~ J'" ... '" e» '" o o - ~ ..... g: z o æ. o õ' -~ .., CIl a. '" '" o :¡= ;0 ~ &l 2l 5l 3 0"0 ~-i Z2 O~ O~ ;¡;:'" ~~ 00 ;0,< ., a '" ::3 '" o Z o - z !!t õ' :J UJ .., ... CIl '" :J iv .....'" C ~ C C/) g C/) þ-þ- ... o o o - ... w o o o o ;0 o -. -,5 ... ;0 sn (I) .þ. :J o ~ o o o - ... '" o o o o I-- I-- ... e» b> 0> '" o o I--- ... e» '" o o o z o ;::¡. .., ~- m... .0 ... c:: ..... "6' ~ ~ g a. I-- ... o o o - ... '" b> o o o ;0 o -. -,5 ... ;0 .'" (I) CD :J o ~ o o o - ... '" o o o o - ... e» o o o o - - - - - z o ;::¡. ., ~- m .0 c:: 'Õ. 3 (I a. I-- CO Ul ð~ oiD "lJ~ m-i ~2 -i~ 0", ;00 o o ~ '" o o fQ !!!. 0' :J 3 5' 3' c:: 3 ... '" '" o o o - ... ... '" '" o o - ~ '" ... '" o o - ... o o o ... '" o o o o - ... .... 8 ~ o <Eï o <¡;; -m ... .0 '" c:: '"0 -s" !5 ~ o :J o ~ - ... o o o ... w ... '" o o I-- '" .þ. &l 0 "0 " Ol 3 0"0 ~-i , 2 ZO OJ'" o "00> m ~~ 60 ;0,< Ol a '" &l "0 Ol Q, ~ 3 5' 3' " 3 ... ~ '" o o o - ... ... .þ. w zg: z~ æ.o æ.,b õ' 0 õ' 0 ~-~ CÐ ~ êD ~ 3.~ 3.~ c ~ C b C/) 00 C/) 0 Þ Þ - ... ... o 0 o 0 o 0 ~ '" o o o - ... '" g 2? o cC" o <¡;; -m ... .0 ... " 1n 'Õ. o 3 o (I) g a - ... o o o I-- ... <0 o o o o I-- ~ I-- :J ... co .'" ;u W (I ~ ;a o o I-- ~ '" o o o I-- '" w O::T)(~ "lJ8 " m".þ.o :;JJ- ñ)'~à ~ (I)", O~~5 ;ca.t.n:J ,!...~ (I) g 6i iD ,.. n.~~ 5' 3" ~ lOa. õ&l~ ~ 5l ;:. -6 2: ~- ~~ a. Iû'~ z~~ OiDe» ~ '" '" o o 'ß"",,; õ&l:;l ~ -g ~ eO"?' "'0 == I~O> Z g Os Sl. 05' 0 ~E!:~ ~(I)a -i::ra. 08" ;0,..3 ~:.o ., ... ::l '? a.õ :J (I) Õ ~" ~~. ~ '" o o o ... .þ. Zg: !! 0 õ'o :J UJ <n ~ a~ C~ C/) 0 Þ ... o o o ~ '" o o o ... '" o o o o ... ~ 1n o o i::> o ... o o o '" ... (l)C'-i "ê ~ æ <" ^::l 0,)59- mCD~ 3.0,)G) Z~:J o~a. o::r[ "lJ3_ gJ~~ » .-. :E -ios; 0;::;: ;0 g. 2. ~s g.< :r ~& 0., Q 5. Z !!t õ' :J UJ ., CIl a. C rJJ Þ tD :J. 10 10 '" m .0 " '5' 3 (I) ;a Zm p 3 II c (I) l/l o ~ i õ' ::l :ll .. 0" .. ~ '<- ¥ :ll :¡¡~ " &r " - "''0 ~ :ll ;¡: !!l g !: !T'D ~ ;¡: c 0 '02: o= Cl ~ õ' < " .. - ~ :!! ~ :ll " c" .. &r '< - ¥ :ll :¡¡!!l : !: "''0 ~ :ll ;¡:" g ;- :)t';- ~ I.~I ",;¡: c 0 'DC' o= c[ .. '" =:0 < " .. - ~ ~ :ll .. C" .. ~ '< - '0 ~ :ll :¡¡!!l " ~ " - "''D ~ :ll ;¡:" o " " &r -- :J''D ~ ",;¡: c 0 '0 C' o= clil .. '" = 0 < " " - -< :!! n · ;; "U III lO CD --" --" ... ... o '" 3 » .g 0 ..., <' § ~ ~m ¡a.P-o- 1 g Z~p. O~ o -0 en m6"~ ~O-~ o ãi' ~ ;on", ãl 0- iii . 3;_ n ~ !!!. o ~ .. w o o o .. CD o o o .. N ..... o o o .. o o o .. N '" o o I--- ~ ~ z'" z~ 9l. 8 2a. (:) õ' õ' 0 ¡¡¡ I--- ¡¡¡ ëÞ~ (þ~ ;ag ;a~ Co Co (nO (nO l> I--- l> - - - - - - i \.f' i zc: OCO o::! -000 m¡¡; ~à -i... 0'" ;08 ~ .. ¡;; n :::l. n ¡;¡ .. .0 co ~. ¡;; ::> 7" .. o o o I 3 c: z.,co o~::! o~. d ;g9'~ ;oÖ'~ » co - -i~- 0'" ill. ;o8~ 0, ~3 _0 ., co 3 a "0 .. en~ >¡ N .. 0 -ê[ <~ !!!.::T ~cg: .. '" '" o o ... N o o o .. '" o o o o .. o o o ... CD '" o o ~ CD N o o .. w '" N o o ~ '" o o o .. CD Z 0 9t 8 õ' ¡¡¡- ..., .. CD N :J ..... ..... 0 Co (nO l>_ - ~ g:' g cõ' 0 cg 0 m- .0 co -tj. 3 '" a .. w o o o o r-- I--- ... Cl ..... 0(') ;g~ ~61 -16- O~ ;0;0 ., 3 3 ~ >¡ .. w o 8 - .. o o o .. w '" o o .. .0 co ~. ¡;; a I Z o ... <0 o (no 3 0 ~- Ill.. a ~ ~o CD 0 ..., 0 (J) ... Cl Ø> ~Q m3 ~61 -i§- o~ ;01 "0 iiî Cõ >¡ .. .0 co ~. ¡;; a .. w o o o - - ... Cl o o .. .þo o o o ... o UI I Z o ~ ::T ., ::> 0- S" o ¡iï ;0 .. ::l [ õl Cõ en ., en [ J .. o o o ... '" ';ft o ii, 2- ... '" ';ft (nO ª. ~. ~ Ill'" ..., '" o ?f!. ~ CD ..., (J) z !!!. õ' -¡¡¡ ..., CD :J ..... ~ C p (n _l> ... '" ';ft o ii, P - - ~ ãr:::l z =: 0 ~ o 0 õ· ~-~- a iIt (þ ~ ~ ~ 00000 »0 » - r-- I--- I--- III III cB" ca" 2;!r--'ßr--'ßr-- :J lO m m ;;0" .c.. .c CD ~ ~. ~ ~. :3'" '0'" '0 ..... 0 3 0 3 o (1) 0 (1) :J :J -.....1--- .....'-- ... o o o .. .. o 0 (:) 0 o 0 ... ~ 01O'<-i "'OG;~o men c."'O ;0 en 0 »~£ãl Ö =:~ g} ;0 Q Q. .. ~-<~ ^ "0 ....~æ UI ., -ienO- 0'0 .. o m -.... .., Q) õ ..g,~ .0 ::> , 5. 10 -<: < '0 ., en .. ~~~ _0- Z' 0 g O(ß~ ... o ... ~'3~d m¡¡¡O-"O ~~£~ 0~61 g¡ ;C cp Q, CD ::c -< ~ s: _ '0 ~~m n en 0- -'0 .. = ãl'~ Q~õ jg :;' ~ !:. co ~ ~ m_CD ~ :3 ....L _0- , 0 g Z<c:r o CD ñ' ~ CD I .0 ., co ::> êt a. ., ~~ .!p: Z O~ ~F- m-o ~a Ö~ ;0(; ::T ... N o o o - .. Ol o o o - ~ CD o o C o (n _l> .. o o o - - - I--- r-- I--- !:: w N W .þo g ... o ... 000 -0"" m"'3 ~CD~ -4 ()'I Õ· 00::> ;O~:r: '< 0- Q ëJ 5. õ· .. .þo o o o o ~ ë.o Z g¡ æ. '=> õ' 0 :J (J) ..., ... (1) N :J '.þo ..... Ol '" o o ~ 8 o o .. w o o o o ~ o o o o o .. w o o o o o ~ UI o o o .. UI UI o o o ~ -.þo o o o o .. '" ...... o o o o ~ o o o o '" .0 I co ., ~. 3 ¡;;3 3.~ al , ., n ^ ::T zg O. ZlD !' 3 c .. en n ., i õ' :::l ;a .. ~i '" 'll ~ ;a ::E ~ z II ~ æ. lI:" ~ õ' ~ :J (J) ëil :J ..... ;a i!:" g ~ ~ 9'j l> i!: c 0 'll ... flD~ 0d: ~Q ~ i!. -C!:!! ~ ;a " 0" .. lit "'- 'll ill ;a al ::E ~ :::l. " lit 10 ,,- co ""'ll en ill m .0 co -tj. 3 .. a ~ ;!§ is.: eli' Ii¡ 210 'c:a;' o~ ;a i!:~ o lit ;a- ::r." ill ""i!: C 0 'll ... flD= N 0" " '" ::0 < " " '6 -C!;;- ;a " 0" .. lit '" - 1 ;;0 :J' lO ;;0 CD a. ;a ::E~ ~ i ""'ll ~ ;a i!:~ g ~ 9'." ill ",,!II: C 0 'll ... flD= 0&1 " '" =0 < " " ìl -< - n ... ~ . ... N Q ... ... CD ... ... Q ... ... .... ... ... '" ... ... '" ... ... .... ... ... '" ~'WÌ ... ... ... '-'" z; P 3 <Ð Gl .g <Ð <" ~ ~@ a _Q Jl ~ ~ C 0. :C:" (J Õ æ-~Q. ~~~ I Q' £ Z . '" ogsgJ o Cl ffi' '1l '" '" mO.", ;O<o<Ð :þ 0·<"+ d'8 ð ;oc,", "''0 i~ 3 . 3 g. <Ð -. ~ ~ Q ëñ o:!:: 1J~ m::l' ~~ d~ ;0;;' a '0 o C '" 0. '" g <Ð .0 C <' Cl If a o:!:: 1J~ m::l' ~~ -43 0'" ;o~ <0 a '0 o C '" 0. (J g '" .0 C <' Cl If a o:!:: 1J~ m::l' ~~ d~ ;0;;' a '0 o C '" 0. (J g '" .0 C <' Cl If a ~ ~ c: ~. :::r lfCl a§ z~ 0- On "'02: m'O ~~. -4!P o ;0... Ul jg~ c: ~. 8 lf3 ~~ ~~ Og 0... 1J0 mo ~C"J 0"" ;o_s:: <Ð r .0 OJ c: '" ~. ~ If< a CiS' is' Ilf Z og- OOJ 1J3 m- ~g ~[ e. or 3 <Ð ~ ....r WOJ a'" ëir~ S.I g r '" OJ .0 '" c: <Ð ~. "ª- CD~ a <Ð I 0 Z'O 0<Ð oª ~c5 ~e, -4 OJ 03 ;os. ~ or 1Jl)l m~ ~ d '2. ;C'g ... r 0) OJ Ul'" ?~ ¡¡¡' s.1 g ~ <Ð '" .0 <Ð ~."ª OJ OJ (Þ"ffi '" ï.g Z<Ð Oiil 05- 'lJeo me. ~ or -43 O<Ð ;o![ Z'O 00 oiJ 1J!2: m.<Ð ~IV -4c.n 00 ;CO .:iE C <Ð en n .. i õ' :J g <Ð .0 c: <' OJ If a õ :¡; OJ e- If o '8 c: '" 0. '" ... ... a < z o z o z o z o o Q Q :Ill " oi .. .. '< - ." ~ ... IV c.n o a - ... ~ o a - ... w CD o a - ... w CD o a - ... w CD o a ... w a o a ... IV o a - - - - :Ill :l:~ Z ~ ¡ æ. ~" õ' ~ :J CIl ..., CD a !Z to... en ::!. 01 ª. ~ is 9'_CIlI-- to m o ~ ~. ~ :Y 0 "'C ¡: CD' 3' C ¡¡¡8 CD8 en I-- a I-- » !Z z~ æ. (:) õ' a :J CIl ..., CD a !Z z~ æ. (:) õ' a :J CIl ..., ... ~ t o a ... <0 Z a æ. g õ' :J CIl ..., ... CD IV :J ..... .-+ a Co eno » ... ..... 01 o a ... Z to to tog¡ et c6" cð- cB" g õ' CO CO CO ::lI--CIl _CIl _CIl_ In m m m ~ § ~. § ~. § ~.~ enc is 3 is 3 8 3 is CD CD CD »I--a-a-a- ... zg: !:!!. a õ' :J In ..., CD !Z a CD o o - - :Ill ;e" g ~ c g.'; en = » ... IV a a o C a en -» ... t o C a en -» ;e c: 0 ." IT 1lD= oä ~õ < " " - -< :!! ~ ... c.n o o a ... 01 o o a ... c.n o o a ... o o o :Ill " 0" .. it ... - ." = !Z ..... o o ... Ul a o a !Z a o o !Z ..... o o ... IV o o o I-- I-- I-- - I-- I-- !Z OJ 01 Z en ::J. 0 ~ 3 eo 0 - s: ~ a g" OJI--ml--'" .., 6't "ê 6't m ªcn irit a <Ð a 3 c.n C iil 8 1! is ~ I-- I-- I-- I-- :Ill :l:~ it ¡ ,..¡ ... 0) Ul CD ;!. is 5' OJ a 5' <Ð iil ... OJ ~ r.ð" 0 eo a '" -m fit .g..,. t; -is" ~ !" ~ 0 g 3. 0 I-- ... 0) Ul CD ;!. is 5' OJ a ~ 5' c.n <Ð W fi1 <=> a ... CD Ul a 3 0 _. a 5' I-- OJ a ... s: œ <Ð a U3 b a I--- I-- - I-- I-- :Ill ;e. o " " ¡ 9'." = !Z c.n w o a - I-- I-- I-- ,..;e c: 0 ." IT 1lD= otl (D = =0 ~ % -< 1\' :Ill .. 0" .. it ... - ." !!i ... IV c.n o a I-- ~ 01 o a I-- ... CD c.n o a I-- ... IV a o a i--- ... ~ o a I-- ... IV CD o o I-- I-- I-- :Ill :l:~ . it . - ,..¡ ~ 61It ~ ..... ~ 01 zµ' z=--' z!" 008008 mO ,..... ,..... .....0 -. -. -. ;0 g I-- g I-- g I-- 5' I-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m ~ œ ~ ~ CD :J a :J w :J ~ CD W -0 -0) -,....:J o Co Co Co Co .-+ a enO eno eno enO - » I-- » I-- » I-- » I-- ... Ol <0 o a ... ..... z=--' sa 8 õ'l--- :J In ¡¡¡ a ... ~ o a en 3 f--- ;::;: =r to ..., o 9' CD ..., CIl I-- - :Ill ¡c. o " " ¡ 9'1 !Z ~ ... IV c.n IV o o '1J m CO CD I-- I-- I-- ,..;e c: 0 ." IT 1lD= otl ~g: ~ õ!. .c! ~ !Z 8 o a ... c.n a o a ... c.n a o a \) ~ ,.-. ~ '8 ~ m:¡ - $lcoo. ro ~ a." -i _ 0",_ ;c",~ "'Ol Ol cr 3 _(D "0 ~cg .. co Q. -ê S" <' CD Ol ëÞ~ a ... '" o o o ~ .... '" o o ... '" 8 o o ... .... '" o o ... '" '" o o o ... '" 8 o o ... o o o ... <0 '" o o ... '" o o o o 'tl Q) co CD ... .... .... o o o ..... w ~ o o o o ,a. ¡¡¡. ?ig: ... N CD Æf ~. s' Ol " æ-æ 3. ~cn (") o :::> " õl e; co ~:e.g o 5'~' o<co -'¡Ol:::> m~- ::u õ' < ~~ë= o õl ::cffiQ Ol . a. CD (D .. " Ñ' ct ~ (õ) ... '" o o o ... <0 Z 0 ~ 8 õ' ::J en ... ... CD '" a ~ Co (/)0 » ... '" 0> o o OJ :::>. <0 <0 .. m .0 c: '6' 3 co a ~ ... '" o o ... '" 0> o o o ... o o o ;:0 ::J. co ;:0 CD ~ ... o '? ... N co 05' (") -.¡ " 0 m:r:::> $: ~ -i~e; O?(t) ;cg-g 2: "6' :::> 3 a. co Q ~ co 0 .0 :¡ c: ~ ~. 3 (DOl ag. 5· , .CD ." '" o o o ~ z~ ~ 0 õ,o ::J en ëÐ ~ a ~ Co (/)0 » en 3 5' OJ o :f CD ëil z.... o'f> ... N ( ) 0:::>(") -.¡g.g m. " $::¡õl -i0le; O><'co ;c'.o g S, :r "0 5' 3 a. CD a Q CD ~ -ê£e. ~ 3 CD~ ~g: co , ." ... .... o o o ~ z ~ œ. 0 õ.o ::J en ... ." CD '" 3. ~ C 0 ~ 0 z'" O'f> ~ z ~ 9!. b õ' 0 :J en ..., ... CD Co> 3. 8 C 0 (/) 0 » ... N '" "0 <0 (") a G.l 0 " .. :::> æ.2.n CD S' c¡; a.'PCi) 0" ; ~ .o~ß 5. ~ 5. ~~ "0 -:¡3 ~~~ ""- '& Z~VJ 0_. Ol o 5._:¡ -.¡... mo> ~~ ~ 0" 5' ;;o~~ ... .... o o o ." Co> '" '" o ~ ... '" '" o ... Co> '" Co> '" o ." ~ o o ~ ... (/)~ 2.0 5' OJ... ... '" o 0> 5'0 CD 0 ... 0 en z ~ õ' :::> .. õl ... ~ 8 en '" » 0 ... N .... , co (") ZOlO o¡gg OSm ;:¡;: ~ e; $:~ -im~ OëÞc: ;c .0. '6. :r3 Ol co :::> :::> ~- :r co .. 5:0> g ~:e. co .0 c: ... <" f'" G.l 5' (D" :::> .:r ." '" 0:> o o ... '" (Jl '" o ... <0 o '" o OJ OJ cà' cB" -~i--~ rn rn ... .0'" .0 ~ c: ~ c: o "Õ. 0 "Õ. g 3 g 3 CD CD _3._3. ..rfII co G> .0 co c: :::> <' CD FtëJ ;a. .g z" 00 oS- -.¡2: m.CO ~Sl 08 ;c .~ ." '" (Jl o o - ~ o (/) 1; 3 0 9'- OJ... a fd 5' (Jl CD 0 ¡;¡ 0 - ... '" '" '" o - ... '" c ~ en '" » 0 - - ... N N ... ... o < "'G> "'co 0:::> <co Q õl 2~ c: <' "0 Ol 0 ffi"ª aCT I .ëõ z 01;l 00 -.¡o m.l. $:~ -i0 o.~ ;c o ... '" o o o - ... <0 Z 0 z 918 9l õ' õ· ::J-::J en en ...." ... CD '" CD agj a c", C (/) 0 (/) » '-- » ." '" o o o - - ." '" o o o o - i-- Z¡þ !:I 3 c CD .. " ., "2 õ' :::> ... ... '? ;Ill <> o~ .. S' '< - '" ~ ;Ill ~~ :; ![ ""'" ~ ;Ill ;::~ g S' :fj ;:: c 0 :~ o[ ~ õ' < ~ ~ :!! ~ ;Ill <> ¡'~ '< '" ~ ~ ~~ U> : ¡ ~ :II:" '0 :r ~ OJ o :f co ëil ;Ill ;::<> g è- :Tj "";:: c 0 '" r::r llo= o~ CD ~ :0 < ~ ~ ~ ;Ill <> ¡'~ '< '" ~ ;Ill ~~ <> S' <> - ""'" ~ ;D ~~ " !!t :T'" ~ ",,3: c 0 '" '" Qa~ ~ê: :0 < " ~ :ïl " e ... ... N .,--,. g~ Õ ~ ~ "E ~ get) "'.A ::rc:: ~ "6' ~ 3 ct> a> '" '" ¡¡;r -" ¡¡¡ a> W£ '" ¡¡; co a> a. or g c:: '" '" o >E o ~ o o o r- 5' a> ~ " a> !l '" o o r- 5' a> ~ " a> !l '" o o r- 5' a> ~ " a> !l o o r- 5' a> ~ " a> !l '" o >E o ~ ..., ;!. ..., >E o 1J Dl co CD ~ .¡:. ct> '2: ~ g~-5' <. 0 ~ S' ooo¡¡; - ::r- g!!!.::!> 3-~ " ëõ ¡¡; '" '< '" ¡¡; :'3 5" C/) !:llll c:: '" a. a. a> - " -. c:: ~ .g ::T g ê:",g:" ãïQ)Q,~ ~:J ~ - go. ~~I ct> III a. ct> "'" III ~. -- ",,,," a. co ..CD :e Œ. q~ o :;' e,¡¡; III - 3 '" a> ~[ 000 ::r", Ill", o ct> :e III o ~ l\.:l 5" ,'" ~(J) Ill'tl 3 ¡¡; ~3 ZlD ~ 3 c .. In " ~ i õ' ::l " CD ~~ '< ." !t " ~g CD ¡¡- CD - "'~ " ~g " !: 9-." !t !: <: 0 ." '" o:: oã ~ g" ~ 3! " ~ ;0 :e~ CD ¡¡- CD - "'l ;0 3:g g ¡¡- ~j ",3: c 0 .,,'" go:: olil CÐ = =0 ~ i!. -< ~ ;0 CD 0" .. ¡¡- '< - ." !t ;0 :e~ CD ¡¡- CD - "'''' !t " 3:g g !: 9-." !t ",3: c 0 .,,'" go:: olil ~~ < i!. ~::!! " \.,' Agenda Request Item ~ber L - '?ii.. Date: June 4. 2002 Consent [X] Regular [ ] Public Hearing [ ] Leg.[ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Board of County Commissioners Presented By: Submitted By: Public Works Dept.-Road & Bridge Division . Scott Herring, Manage Road & Bridge Division SUBJECT: Approval of Local Agency Participation (LAP) Agreement for the Midway Rd. Corridor Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study, Granting Permission to Advertise for Request for Qualifications (RFQ's) for the PD&E Study and Adoption of Resolution # 02-136 authorizing the Chair to sign the LAP Agreement, and authorize the Chair to sign the Federal Aid Project Funding Request. BACKGROUND: Staff has been working with the Florida Department of Transportation to finalize the LAP agreement and scope of services for the Midway Rd. Corridor Study PD&E. At this time, FOOT has conceptually approved these documents. Staff is requesting that the Board approve the LAP Agreement and adopt Resolution #02-136 authorizing the Chair to sign the LAP Agreement. FOOT has set aside $655,803 to fund the PD&E study. Staff is also requesting that the Board grant permission to advertise for RFQ's for the PD&E study. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account number and name to be determined upon receipt of the executed LAP Agreement from FOOT. PREVIOUS ACTION: July 24th 2001 Board direction to staff to enter into the LAP Agreement to provide for the Midway Road Corridor Study PD&E. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the LAP Agreement and adopt Resolution # 02-136 authorizing the Chair to sign the LAP Agreement, authorize staff to advertise for RFQ's for the Midway Road Corridor Study PD&E, and authorize the chair to sign the Federal Aid Project Funding Request. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ~. ~ APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED ~~ A Douglas M. Anderson /}f'í/ County Administrator (X] County Attorney ~. (X J Originating Dept. Public Works ~~. . Coordination/Signatures [X] Mgt. & Budget ÚO-1nI\~ [X] co.Eng~. ( X ] Purchasing [X] Other Barbara Meinhardt. Revenue Coord. O!i" ~ µf!- ( ] Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) '-" ...",; RESOLUTION NO. 02-136 A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT AND PROVIDING WHEN THIS RESOLUTION WILL TAKE EFFECT. WHEREAS, the State of Florida Department of Transportation and St. Lucie County desire to facilitate the Midway Road Corridor PD&E and Study; and WHEREAS, the State of Florida has requested St. Lucie County, Florida, to execute and deliver to the State of Florida Department of Transportation a Local Agency Agreement for the aforementioned project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County of St. Lucie County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, that the Chairman is hereby authorized to make, execute, and deliver to the State of Florida Department of Transportation a Local Agency Agreement for the aforementioned project. DONE AND RESOLVED this 4th day of June, 2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY '-' 525-010-300 Local Agency Program Manual LOCAL AGENCY: Sf. LUCIE COONlY WORK PROGRAM ITEM NO.: TIP PAGE NO.: ..." September 10, 2000 Chapter 2 Section 1 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: MIrnAY ROAD PO & E STIJDY STIP PAGE NO.: Use this sheet as a cover sheet to the project application package. Place an "X" in the right colwnn to deoote items included. If oot applicable, state N/ A. Include in the cover letter a comment explaining the action taken on each item as appropriate. Application: 1. 2. 3. 4. Federal Aid Project Funding Request (Chapter 2-1)................................................ Vicinity Map....................................................................................................... Typical Roadway Section ................................................................................... Typical Bridge Section............................ ....... .:.................................................... x X N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N>A NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A REMARKS: PROJEC1' FONDlll; REQJEsr AND LAP AGREEMENr FOR ST. LUCIE COONlY TO PERroa1 PO & E SIUIJY CN MmlAY ROAD FRCM S.R. 5 (U.S. ) TO 25'n1 STREET. Exhibit II-I-I- Project Funding Application Checklist Supporting Data: 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Safety Improvements (Chapter 4-1)...................................................................... Deviation Request and Justification (Chapter 4-1)................................................... Environmental Docwnent (Chapter 2-4) ............................................................... Compliance with environmental docwnent commitments ......................................... Right of Way Required (Chapter 2-5).................................................................... a. Pre-Qualification Letter of Approval From FDOT .................... ..................... .... ......... ................. ... ........ ......... b. Right of Way Maps................................................................................. c. Right of Way Project Cost Estimate .......................................................... d. Request Right of Way Project Authorization............................................... Right of Way Certification (Chapter 2-Sect 5)........................................................ 10. 11. Corp of Engineers, and/or Coast Guard Permits (Environmental Permit Coordination Procedure No. 650-040-001) .......................... ....................... ....... ...................... Water Management District Permit ....................................................................... NPDES Permit .................... ................... ........ ......... ...................................:....... FAA Notification (FAA for 7460-1) (14 CFR, Part 77; Chapter 333, FS) .................. 12. 13. 14. 2·1·2 '- ....,I "?~ v,s' , 34982 BOARD OFr-rovljjj;-' REALTORS I SOUTH ! Y I PLAZA . L..._ ___ ?ro3ecA- ~c:O. P~ec~ ()¡ tcQ wo...i ~. p n ~ E. V ~ c.-'\ "'- Ì' '- 'I. Y"r\ ~ s ~~'1. '-' ...., STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL·AID PROJECT FUNDING REQUEST 525-()1o-30 CONSTRUCTION 08100 Page 1 of2 DATE: AGENCY: ST. L liC IE COUNTY FEDERAL-AID PROJECT NUMBER: FIN NUMBER: STATE JOB NUMBER: TIP PAGE NO.: PROJECT TITLE: MIDWAY ROAD PD&E STUDY PROJECT TERMINI FROM: S . R . 5 (U. S. 1 ) WORK PHASE: 0 PLANNING 0 ENVIRONMENT 0 DESIGN AWARD TYPE: 0 LOCAL 0 LOCAL FORCES TO: SOUTH 25TH STREET o CONSTRUCTION 0 RIGHT OF WAY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Mark the type of environmental document prepared, indicate the approval date, and the most recent reevaluation date. , and reevaluated on , and reevaluated on EIS approved on EA/FONSI approved on Categorical Exclusion: Programmatic Categorical Exclusion determination on Type I Categorical Exclusion determination on Type II Categorical Exclusion approved on Categorical Exclusion Reevaluation on TOTAL LOCAL AGENCY STATE FEDERAL FUNDS PERCENT OBLIGATION DATE PHASE ESTIMATED COST FUNDS FUNDING FEDERAL (Nearest Dollar) (Nearest Dollar) (Nearest Dollar) (Nearest dollar) FUNDS Month I Year PLANNING PD&E $655,803.0 DESIGN R/W CONST. , TOTAL DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITY (Existing Design and Present Condition) Roadway Width: 22' Number of Lanes: 2 Bridge Number(s) on Project: 940035 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOS.§9-WORlCrrNew C~~;¡;;;ctioñ----D-3;R-- - - m EN.HANCEMENT o CONGESTION MITIGATION ~/ Number of Lanes: 4 //,. Roadway Width: Bridge Number(s) on Project: 940035 WIDEN TWO (2) LANE TO FOUR (4) LANES. REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE, ADA RAMPS AT THREE (3) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS, CONSTRUCT 5' SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, BRICK PAVERS DRAINAGE 4' BIKE LANE ON ROADWAY LOCAL AGEI'JCY COÑT ACT PERSON: J. SCOTT HERRING, P.E. TITLE: ROAD & BRIDGE MANAGER MAILING ADDRESS: 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE PHONE: (772) 462-2717 CITY: FT. PIERCE, FL ZIP CODE: 34982 LOCATION AND DESIGN APPROVAL BY: (Approving Authority) TITLE: ROAD & BRIDGE MANAGER DATE: '-' ~ AGENCY: I PROJECT TITLE: I DATE: 525-010-30 CONSTRUCTION 08100 Page 2 of 2 I ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS: TO BE DETERMINED BY THE PD&E STUDY. RIGHT OF WAY AND RELOCATION: TO BE DETERMINED BY THE PD&E STUDY. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF THE ADMINISTRATION AGENCY OR AGENCIES, OR ITS DESIGNEE, AND IS NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE AGENCY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. AGENCY: ST. LUCIE COUNTY DATE: BY: (Mayor/Chairman) "- ....".1 State of Florida Department of Transportation LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM AGREEMENT 525.()10-40 CONSTRUCTION OGC ' 01/02 Page 1 or 12 FPN No Fund: FLAIR Approp: Federal No: Org. Code: FLAIR Obj.: FPN No. Fund: FLAIR Approp: Federal No: Org. Code: FLAIR Obj.: County No. Contract No: Vendor No.: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA): 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an aQency of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the Department, and ST. LUCIE COUNTY hereinafter called the Agency. WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, the Agency has the authority to enter into said Agreement and to undertake the project hereinafter described, and the Department has been granted the authority to function adequately in all areas of appropriate jurisdiction including the implementation of an integrated and balanced transportation system and is authorized under Section 334.044, Florida Statutes toenter into this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and representations herein, the parties agree as follows: 1.00 Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the Department's participation in MIDWAY ROAD PD[,E and as further described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, hereinafter called the project, and to provide Departmental financial assistance to the Agency and state the terms and conditions upon which such assistance will be provided and the understandings as to the manner in which the project will be undertaken and completed. 1.01 Modifications and Additions: Exhibit(s) A [, B are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. 2.00 Accomplishment of the Project: 2.01 General Requirements: The Agency shall commence, and complete the project as described in EXHIBIT "A" with all practical dispatch, in a sound, economical, and efficient manner, and in accordance with the provisions herein, and all applicable laws. The project will be performed in accordance with all applicable Department procedures, guidelines, manuals, standards, and directives as described in the Department's Local Agency Program Manual, which by this reference is made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. A full time employee of the Agency, qualified to ensure that the work being pursued is complete, accurate, and consistent with the terms, conditions, and specifications of this Agreement shall be in charge of each project. 2.02 Expiration of Agreement: The Agency agrees to complete the project on or before APRIL 30, 2004 . If the Agency does not complete the project within this time period, this Agreement will expire on the last day of scheduled completion as provided in this paragraph unless an extension of the time period is requested by the Agency and granted in writing by the DEPARTMENT prior to the expiration of the Agreement. Expiration of this Agreement will be considered termination of the project. The cost of any work performed after the expiration date of the Agreement will not be reimbursed by the Department. 2.03 Pursuant to Federal, State, and Local Law: In the event that any election, referendum, approval, permit, notice, or other proceeding or authorization is requisite under applicable law to enable the Agency to enter into this Agreement or to undertake the project hereunder, or to observe, assume or carry out any of the provisions of the Agreement, the Agency will initiate and consummate, as provided by law, all actions necessary with respect to any such matters so requisite. 2.04 Funds of the Agency: The Agency shall initiate and prosecute to completion all proceedings necessary, including Federal-aid requirements, to enable the Agency to provide the necessary funds for completion of the project. '-' ..¡ 525-010-40 CONSTRUCTION OGC·01/02 Page2of12 2.05 Submission of Proceedings, Contracts and Other Documents: The Agency shall submit to the Department such data, reports, records, contracts and other documents relating to the project as the Department and the Federal Highway Administration may require. 3.00 Project Cost: 3.01 Total Cost: The estimated total cost of the project is $ 655,803.00 . This amount is based upon the schedule of funding in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. The Agency agrees to bear all expenses in excess of the total cost of the project and any deficits involved. The schedule of funding may be modified by mutual agreement as provided for in 4.00. 3.02 Department Participation: The Department agrees to participate, including contingencies, in the project cost to the extent provided in Exhibit "B". This amount includes Federal-aid funds which are limited to the actual amount of Federal-aid participation. 3.03 Limits on Department Funds: Project costs eligible for Department participation will be allowed only from the date of this Agreement. It is understood that Department participation in eligible project costs is subject to: a) Legislative approval of the Department's appropriation request in the work program year that the project is scheduled b) Availability of funds as stated in paragraphs 3.04 and 3.05 of this Agreement; c) Approval of all plans, specifications, contracts or other obligating documents and all other terms of this Agreement; d) Department approval of the project scope and budget at the time appropriation authority becomes available. 3.04 Appropriation of Funds: The Department's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature. 3.05 Multi-Year Commitment: In the event this Agreement is in excess of $25,000 and has a term for a period of more than one year, the provisions of Section 339.135(6)(a), Florida Statutes, are hereby incorporated: "(a) The department, during any fiscal year, shall not expend money, incur any liability, or enter into any contract which, by its terms, involves the expenditure of money in excess of the amounts budgeted as available for expenditure during such fiscal year. Any contract, verbal or written, made in violation of this subsection is null and void, and no money may be paid on such contract. The department shall require a statement from the comptroller of the Department that funds are available prior to entering into any such contract or other binding commitment of funds. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the making of contracts for periods exceeding 1 year, but any contract so made shall be executory only for the value of the services to be rendered or agreed to be paid for in succeeding fiscal years, and this paragraph shall be incorporated verbatim in all contracts of the Department which are for an amount in excess of $25,000 and which have a term for a period of more than 1 year." 3.06 Notice to Proceed: No cost may be incurred under this contract until the Agency has received a Notice to Proceed from the Department. 3.07 Limits on Federal Participation: Federal-aid funds shall not participate in any cost which is not incurred in conformity with applicable Federal and State law, the regulations in 23 C.F.R. and 49 C.F.R., and policies and procedures prescribed by the Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Federal funds shall not be paid on account of any cost incurred prior to authorization by the FHWA to the Department to proceed with the project or part thereof involving such cost. (23 CFR 1.9 (a)). If FHWA or the Department determines that any amount claimed is not eligible, Federal participation may be approved in the amount determined to be adequately supported, the Department shall notify the Agency in writing citing the reasons why items and amounts are not eligible for Federal participation. Where correctable non-compliance with provisions of law or FHWA requirements exists, Federal funds may be withheld until compliance is obtained. Where non-compliance is not correctable, FHWA or the Department may deny participation in parcel or project costs in part or in total. '-' ....., 525-010-40 CONSTRUCTION OGC·01102 Page 3 of 12 For any amounts determined to be ineligible for Federal reimbursement for which the Department has advanced payment, the Agency shall promptly reimburse the Department for all such amounts within 90 days of written notice. 4.00 Project Estimate and Disbursement Schedule: Prior to the execution of this Agreement, a project schedule of funding, shall be prepared by the Agency and approved by the Department. The Agency shall maintain said schedule of funding, carry out the project and shall incur obligations against and make disbursements of project funds only in conformity with the latest approved schedule of funding for the project. The schedule of funding may be revised by mutual written agreement between the Department and the Agency. If revised, a copy of the revision should be forwarded to the Department's Comptroller and to the Department's Federal-Aid Program Office. No increase or decrease shall be effective unless it complies with fund participation requirements established in Exhibit "B" of this Agreement and is approved by the Department's Comptroller. 5.00 Records: 5.01 Establishment and Maintenance of Accounting Records: Records of costs incurred under terms of this Agreement shall be maintained and made available upon request to the Department at all times during the period of this Agreement and for five(5) years after final payment is made. Copies of these documents and records shall be furnished to the Department upon request. Records of costs incurred includes the Agency's general accounting records and the project records, together with supporting documents and records, of the Agency and all subcontractors performing work on the project and all other records of the Agency and subcontractors considered necessary by the Department for a proper audit of costs. If any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the five(5) year period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. 5.02 Costs Incurred for the Project: The Agency shall charge to the project account all eligible costs of the project. Costs in excess of the latest approved schedule of funding or attributable to actions which have not received the required approval of the Department shall not be considered eligible costs. 5.03 Documentation of Project Costs: All costs charged to the project, including any approved services contributed by the Agency or others, shall be supported by properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts or vouchers evidencing in proper detail the nature and propriety of the charges. 5.04 Audit Reports: Recipients of Federal and State funds are to have audits done annually using the following criteria: Federal awards are to be identified using the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) title and number, award number and year, and name of the awarding Federal agency. State awards will be identified using the Catalog of State Financial Assistance (CSFA) title and number, award number and year, and name of the awarding State Agency. In the event that a recipient expends $300,000 or more in Federal awards in its fiscal year, the recipient must have a single or program specific audit conducted in accordance with the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A·133. If a recipient expends less than $300,000 in Federal awards during its fiscal year, an audit conducted in accordance with the OMB Circular A-133 is not required. If a recipient expends less than $300,000 in Federal awards during its fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, the cost of the audit must be paid from non-Federal funds. In the event that a recipient expends $300,000 or more in State awards during its fiscal year, the recipient must have a state single or program specific audit conducted in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 10.600, Rules of the Auditor General. If a recipient expends less than $300,000 in State awards during its fiscal year, an audit conducted in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 10.600, Rules of the Auditor General is not required. If a recipient expends less than $300,000 in State awards during its fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 10.600, Rules ofthe Auditor General, the cost of the audit must be paid from non-State funds. Reporting Packages and management letters generated from audits conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A·133 and Financial Reporting Packages generated in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, and '- ..., 525-010-40 CONSTRUCTION OGC - 01{02 Page 4 of 12 Chapter 10.600, Rules of the Auditor General shall be submitted to the awarding FOOT office, by the recipient, within 30 days of receiving it. The aforementioned items are to be received by the appropriate FOOT office no later than 9 months after the end of the recipient's fiscal year. The recipient shall follow up and take corrective action on audit findings. Preparation of a summary schedule of prior year audit findings, including corrective action and current status of the audit finding is required. Current year audit findings require corrective action and status of finding. Records related to unresolved audit findings, appeals, or litigation shall be retained until the action is completed or the dispute is resolved. Access to project records and audit work papers shall be given to the FOOT, the Comptroller, and the Office of the Auditor General. The recipient shall submit required audit documentation as follows: A Reporting Package and Data Collection Form for each audit conducted in accordance with OMS Circular A·133 shall be sent to: Federal Audit Clearinghouse Bureau of the Census 1201 East 10th Street Jefferson, IN 47132 A Financial Reporting Package of audits conducted in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 10.600, Rules of the Auditor General shall be sent to: State of Florida Auditor General Attn: Ted J. Sauerbeck Room 574, Claude Pepper Building 111 West Madison Street Tallahassee, FL 32302 5.05 Inspection: The Agency shall permit, and shall require its contractors to permit, the Department's authorized representatives and authorized agents of the Federal Highway Administration to inspect all work, wor1<manship, materials, payrolls, records and to audit the books, records and accounts pertaining to the financing and development of the project. The Department reserves the right to unilaterally cancel this Agreement for refusal by the Agency or any contractor, sub- contractor or materials vendor to allow public access to all documents, papers, letters or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received in conjunction with this Agreement. (Section 287.058(1)(c), Florida Statutes) 5.06 Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Statistical Report: For any project requiring additional right of way, the Agency must submit to the Department an annual report of its real property acquisition and relocation assistance activities on the project. Activities shall be reported on a federal fiscal year basis, from October 1 through September 30. The report must be prepared using the format prescribed in 49 CFR 24, Appendix B and be submitted to the Department no later than October 15 each year. 6.00 Requisitions and Payments: Requests for reimbursement for fees or other compensation for services or expenses incurred All recipients of funds from this agreement, including those contracted by the Agency, must submit bills for any travel expenses, when authorized by the terms of this agreement, in accordance with Section 112.061 Florida Statutes and Chapter 3-Travel of the Department's Disbursement Operations Manual, Topic 350-030-400. (Section 287.058(1 )(b), Florida Statutes) If, after project completion, any claim is made by the Department resulting from an audit or for work or services performed pursuant to this Agreement, the Department may offset such amount from payments due for work or services done under any agreement which it has with the Agency owing such amount if, upon demand, payment of the amount is not made within 60 days to the Department. Offsetting any amount pursuant to this section shall not be considered a breach of contract by the Department. '- .."", 525-010-40 CONSTRUCTION OGe - 01/02 Page 5 of 12 7.00 The Department's Obligations: Subject to other provisions hereof, the Department will honor requests for reimbursement to the Agency in amounts and at times deemed by the Department to be proper to ensure the carrying out of the project and payment of the eligible costs. However, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Department may elect by notice in writing not to make a payment if: 7.01 Misrepresentation: The Agency shall have made misrepresentation of a material nature in its application, or any supplement thereto or amendment thereof, or in or with respect to any document of data furnished therewith or pursuant hereto; 7.02 Litigation: There is then pending litigation with respect to the performance by the Agency of any of its duties or obligations which may jeopardize or adversely affect the project, the Agreement or payments to the project; 7.03 Approval by Department: The Agency shall have taken any action pertaining to the project, which under this Agreement, requires the approval of the Department or has made related expenditure or incurred related obligations without having beenadvised by the Department that same are approved; 7.04 Conflict of Interests: There has been any violation of the conflict of interest provisions contained herein; or 7.05 Default: The Agency has been determined by the Department to be in default under any of the provisions of the Aç¡reement. 7.06 Federal Participation: The Department may suspend or terminate payment for that portion of the project which the FHWA, or the Department acting in lieu of the FHWA, may designate as ineligible for Federal-aid. 7.07 Disallowed Costs: In determining the amount of the payment, the Department will exclude all projects costs incurred by the Agency prior to the effective date of this Agreement or the date of authorization, costs incurred after the expiration of the Agreement, costs which are not provided for in the latest approved schedule of funding for the project, and costs attributable to goods or services received under a contract or other arrangements which have not been approved in writing by the Department. 7.08 Final Invoices: The Agency must submit the final invoice on the project to the Department within 120 days after the completion of the project. Invoices submitted after the 120 day time period will not be paid. 8.00 Termination or Suspension of Project: 8.01 Termination or Suspension Generally: The Department may, by written notice to the Agency, suspend any or all of its obligations under this Agreement until such time as the event or condition resulting in such suspension has ceased or been corrected, or the Department may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part at any time the interest of the Department requires such termination. If the Department determines that the performance of the Agency is not satisfactory, the Department shall have the option of (a) immediately terminating the Agreement or (b) suspending the Agreement and notifying the Agency of the deficiency with a requirement that the deficiency be corrected within a specified time. otherwise the Agreement will be terminated at the end of such time. Suspension of the contract will not affect the time period for completion of the agreement. If the Department requires termination of the Agreement for reasons other than unsatisfactory performance of the Agency, the Department shall notify the Agency of such termination, with instructions as to the effective date of termination or specify the stage of work at which the Agreement is terminated. If the Agreement is terminated before performance is completed, the Agency shall be paid for the work satisfactorily performed. Payment is to be on the basis of substantiated costs. 8.02 Action Subsequent to Notice of Termination or Suspension. Upon receipt of any final termination or suspension notice under this paragraph, the Agency shall proceed promptly to carry out the actions required therein which may include any or all of the following: (a) necessary action to terminate or suspend, as the case may be, project activities and contracts and such other action as may be required or desirable to keep to the minimum the costs upon the basis of which the financing is to be computed; (b) furnish a statement of the project activities and contracts, and other undertakings the cost of which are otherwise includable as project costs. The termination or suspension shall be carried out in conformity with the latest schedule, plan, and cost as approved by the Department or upon the basis of terms and conditions ~ ....." 525-(l1().40 CONSTRUCTION OGC ' 01102 Page 6 of 12 imposed by the Department upon the failure of the Agency to furnish the schedule, plan, and estimate within a reasonable time. The closing out of Federal financial participation in the project shall not constitute a waiver of any claim which the Department may otherwise have arising out of this Agreement. 9.00 Contracts of the Agency: 9.01 Third Party Agreements: Except as otherwise authorized in writing by the Department, the Agency shall not execute any contract or obligate itself in any manner requiring the disbursement of Department funds, including consultant or construction contracts or amendments thereto, with any third party with respect to the project without the written approval of the Department. Failure to obtain such approval shall be sufficient cause for nonpayment by the Department. The Department specifically reserves unto itself the right to review the qualifications of any consultant or contractor and to approve or disapprove the employment of the same. 9.02 Compliance with Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act: It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that participation by the Department in a project with an Agency, where said project involves a consultant contract for engineering, architecture or surveying services, is contingent on the Agency complying in full with provisions of Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act. At the discretion of the Department, the Agency will involve the Department in the Consultant Selection Process for all projects. In all cases, the Agency's Attorney shall certify to the Department that selection has been accomplished in compliance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act. 10.00 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Policy and Obligation: 10.01 DBE Policy: It is the policy of the Department that disadvantaged business enterprises, as defined in 49 C.F.R. Part 26, as amended, shall have the opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Department funds under this Agreement. The DBE requirements of applicable Federal and State regulations apply to this Aareement. 10.02 DBE Obligation: The Agency and its contractors agree to ensure that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises as defined in applicable Federal and State regulations, have the opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and this Agreement. In this regard, all recipients and contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with applicable Federal and State regulations, to ensure that the Disadvantaged Business Enterprises have the opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. The Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the award and performance of Department assisted contracts. 10.03 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Obligations: If Federal Transit Administration or FHWA Funding is a part of this project, the Agency must comply with applicable Federal and State regulations. 11.00 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary Exclusion (Applicable to all Federal·aid contracts - 49 CFR 29) By signing and submitting this Agreement, the Agency is providing the certification set out below: The inability of the Agency to provide the certification set out below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The Agency shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the Department's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the Agency to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such the Agency from participation in this transaction. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the Department determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the Agency knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available, Department may terminate this transaction for cause of default. The Agency shall provide immediate written notice to the Department if any time the Agency learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The terms "covered "debarred," "suspended," ineligible," "lower tier covered transaction," "participant," "person," primary covered transaction," "principal," "proposal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549. Contact the Department for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. \w ...., 525-010-40 CONSTRUCTION OGC - 01102 Page 7 0'12 The Agency further agrees by submitting this Agreement that it shall not knowingly enter into any contracts with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the Department. The Agency further agrees by submitting this Agreement that it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction," provided by the Department, without modification, in all contracts and in all solicitations for contracts. The Agency may rely upon a certification of a prospective sub-contractor that the person is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. The Agency may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its sub-contractors. The Agency may, but is not required the nonprocurement portion of the "Lists of Parties Excluded From Federal Procurement or Nonprocurement Programs" (Nonprocurement List) which is compiled by the General Services Administration. to, check the non procurement portion of the "Lists of Parties Excluded From Federal Procurement or Nonprocurement Programs" Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of the Agency is not required to exceed that which is normally processed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. Unless authorized by the Department, if the Agency knowingly enters into a contract with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available, the Department may terminate this transaction for cause or default. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion: The Agency certifies, by execution of this Agreement, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. Where the Agency is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, an explanation shall be attached to this proposal. 12.00 Restrictions, Prohibitions, Controls, and Labor Provisions: 12.01 Equal Employment Opportunity: In connection with the carrying out of any project, the Agency shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, age, religion, color, sex, national origin, disability or marital status. The Agency will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, age, religion, color, gender, national origin, disability or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of payor other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Agency shall insert the foregoing provision modified only to show the particular contractual relationship in all its contracts in connection with the development of operation of the project, except contracts for the standard commercial supplies or raw materials, and shall require all such contractors to insert a similar provision in all subcontracts, except subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. When the project involves installation, construction, demolition, removal, site improvement, or similar work, the Agency shall post, in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment for project work, notices to be provided by the Department setting forth the provisions of the nondiscrimination clause. 12.02 Title VI - Civil Rights Act of 1964: The Agency will comply with all the requirements imposed by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1 964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d), the Regulations of the Federal Department of Transportation issued thereunder, and the assurance by the Agency pursuant thereto. The Agency shall include provisions in all contracts with third parties that ensure compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,49 C.F.R., Part 21, and related statutes and regulations. 12.03 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA): The Agency will comply with all the requirements as imposed by the ADA, the regulations of the Federal government issued thereunder, and assurance by the Agency pursuant thereto. \w ...." 525-010-40 CONSTRUCTION OGC ' 01/02 Page 8 of 12 12.04 Public Entity Crime: A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 12.05 Discrimination: In accordance with Section 287.134 F.S., an entity or affiliate who has been placed on the Discriminatory Vendor List, kept by the Florida Department of Management Services, may not submit a bid on a contract to provide goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity. 12.06 Prohibited Interests: Neither the Agency nor any of its contractors or their subcontractors shall enter into any contract, subcontract, or arrangement in connection with the project or any property included or planned to be included in the project in which any member, officer or employee of the Agency or the locality during his tenure or for two years thereafter has any interest, direct or indirect. If any such present or former member, officer or employee involuntarily acquires or had acquired prior to the beginning of his tenure any such interest, and if such interest is immediately disclosed to the Agency, the Agency with prior approval of the Department may waive the prohibition contained in this subsection, provided, that any such present member, officer or employee shall not participate in any action by the Agency or the locality relating to such contract, subcontract, or arrangement. The Agency shall insert in all contracts entered into in connection with the project or any property included or planned to be included in any project, and shall require its contractors to insert in each of their subcontracts, the following provision: "No member, officer or employee of the Agency or of the locality during his tenure or for two years thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this contract or the proceeds thereof." The provisions of this subsection shall not be applicable to any agreement between the Agency and its fiscal depositories, or to any agreement for utility services the rates for which are fixed or controlled by a Governmental agency. 12.07 Interest of Members of, or Delegates to, Congress: No member or delegate to the Congress of the United States shall be admitted to any share or part of the Agreement or any benefit arising therefrom. 13.00 Miscellaneous Provisions: 13.01 Environmental Regulations: The Agency will be solely responsible for compliance with all applicable environmental regulations and for any liability arising from non-compliance with these regulations and will reimburse the Department for any loss incurred in connection therewith. The Agency will be responsible for securing any applicable permits. 13.02 Department Not Obligated to Third Parties: The Department shall not be obligated or liable hereunder to any party other than the Agency. 13.03 When Rights and Remedies Not Waived: In no event shall the making by the Department of any payment to the Agency constitute or be construed as a waiver by the Department of any breach of covenant or any default which may then exist on the part of the Agency and the making of such payment by the Department, while any such breach or default shall exist, shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to the Department with respect to such breach or default. 13.04 How Agreement Is Affected by Provisions Being Held Invalid: If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. In such an instance the remainder would then continue to conform to the terms and requirements of applicable law. 13.05 Bonus or Commission: By execution of the Agreement, the Agency represents that it has not paid and, also, agrees not to pay, any bonus or commission for the purpose of obtaining an approval of its application for the financing hereunder. \w 'IIfII/IÎ 525-010-40 CONSTRUCTION OGC - 01/02 Page 9 of 12 13.06 State Law: Nothing in the Agreement shall require the Agency to observe or enforce compliance with any provision thereof, perform any other act or do any other thing in contravention of any applicable State law, provided, that if any of the provisions of the Agreement violate any applicable State law, the Agency will at once notify the Department in writing in order that appropriate changes and modifications may be made by the Department and the Agency to the end that the Agency may proceed as soon as possible with the project. 13.07 Contractual Indemnity: To the extent permitted by law, the Agency shall indemnify, defend, save, and hold harmless the Department and all its officers, agents and employees from any claim, loss, damage, cost, charge or expense arising out of any act, error, omission or negligent act by the Agency, its officers, agents or employees during the performance of the Agreement except that neither the Agency, its officers, agents or its employees will be liable under this paragraph for any claim, loss damage, cost, charge or expense arising out of any act, error, omission or negligent act by the Department or any of its officers, agents or employees during the performance of the Agreement. The parties agree that this clause shall not waive the benefits or provisions of Chapter 768.28, Florida Statutes, or any similar provision of law. When the Department receives a notice of claim for damages that may have been caused by the Agency in the performance of services required under this Agreement, the Department will immediately forward the claim to the Agency. The Agency and the Department will evaluate the claim and report their findings to each other within 14 working days and will jointly discuss options in defending the claim. After reviewing the claim, the Department will determine whether to require the participation of the Agency in the defense of the claim or to require the Agency defend the Department in such claim as described in this section. The Department's failure to promptly notify the Agency of a claim shall not act as a waiver of any right herein to require the participation in or defense of the claim by the Agency. The Department and the Agency will each pay its own expenses for the evaluation, settlement negotiations, and trial, if any. However, if only one party participates in the defense of the claim at trial, that party is responsible for all expenses at trial. 13.08 Plans and Specifications: In the event that this Agreement involves constructing and equipping of facilities on the State Highway System, the Agency shall submit to the Department for approval all appropriate plans and specifications covering the project. The Department will review all plans and specifications and will issue to the Agency written approval with any approved portions of the project and comments or recommendations covering any remainder of the project deemed appropriate. After resolution of these comments and recommendations to the Department's satisfaction, the Department will issue to the Agency written approval with said remainder of the project. Failure to obtain this written approval shall be sufficient cause of nonpayment by the Department. 13.09 Right of Way Certification: Upon completion of right of way activities on the project, the Agency must certify compliance with all applicable federal and state requirements. Certification is required prior to advertisement for or solicitation of bids for construction of the project, including those projects for which no right of way is required. 13.10 Agency Certification: The Agency will certify in writing, prior to project closeout, that the project was completed in accordance with applicable plans and specifications, is in place on the Agency facility, that adequate title is in the Agency, and that the project is accepted by the Agency as suitable for the intended purpose. 13.11 Agreement Format: All words used herein in the singular form shall extend to and include the plural. All words used in the plural form shall extend to and include the singular. All words used in any gender shall extend to and include all genders. 13.12 Execution of Agreement: This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in a minimum of two counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts together shall constitute one in the same instrument. 13.13 Restrictions on Lobbying: Federal: The Agency agrees that no Federally appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid by or on behalf of the Agency, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract, want, loan or cooperative aç¡reement. '-' ..., 525-01().40 CONSTRUC1l0N OGe·Ol102 Pag.l0 á 12 If any funds other than Federally appropriated funds have been paid by the Agency to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Fonn-LLL, "Disclosure Fonn to Report LObbying," in accordance with its instructions. The Agency shall require that the language of this section be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. State: No funds received pursuant to this contract may be expended for lobbying the Legislature or a State agency. 13.14 Maintenance: The Agency agrees to maintain any project not on the State System, constructed under this Agreement. If the Agency constructs any improvement on Department right-of-way, the Agency 0 will 0 will not maintain the improvements made for their useful life. 13.15 Vendors Rights: Vendors (in this document identified as Agency) providing goods and services to the Department should be aware of the following time frames. Upon receipt, the Department has five 5 working days to inspect and approve the goods and services unless the bid specifications, purchase order or contract specifies otherwise. The Department has 20 days to deliver a request for payment (vQucher) to the Department of Banking and Finance. The 20 days are measured from the latter of the date the invoice is received or the goods or services are received, inspected, and approved. If a payment is not available within 40 days after receipt of the invoice and receipt, inspection, and approval of goods and services, a separate interest penalty in accordance with Section 215.422(3)(b), Florida Statutes, will be due and payable, in addition to the invoice amount to the Agency. Interest penalties of less than one $1 will not be enforced unless the Agency requests payment. Invoices which have to be returned to an Agency because of Agency preparation errors will result in a delay in the payment. The invoice payment requirements do not start until a properly completed invoice is prOVided to the Department. A Vendor Ombudsman has been established within the Department of Banking and Finance. The duties of this individual include acting as an advocate for Agencies who may be experiencing problems in obtaining timely payment(s) from the Department. The Vendor Ombudsman may be contacted at (850)410-9724 or by calling the State Comptroller's Hotline, 1-800-848-3792. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. AGENCY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: Title: By: TiUe: CllAIR, sr.LOCIE cæNlY OOARD OF CXlJNIY a:M1ISSIœERS Attest: Title: Attest : TiUe: As to fonn: As to fonn: Attorney District Attorney See attached Encumbrance Fonn for date of funding approval by Comptroller. ~ ..." 525-01C>40 CONSTRUC110N OGC·Ol/02 Page" å12 FPN NO EXHIBIT A Project Description and Respor.sibilities This exhibit forms an integral part of that certain Reimbursement Agreement between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and Sf. LUCIE COUNIY Dated PROJECT LOCATION: MITMAY ROAD I\E."M:EN S.R. 5 (U.S. I) AND soum 25m STREET. The project 0 is 0 is not on the National Highway System. The project 0 is g: is not on the State Highway System. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CŒDUcr A FœE SWDY rn MITMAY Rt:W) BElWEEN S.R.5 (U.S. I) AND soorn 25m STREET. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION BY AGENCY: Þ.GFJ!lC{ WILL crnoocr PŒ.E SI'UDY usm:; a:NSULTANl'S m Ac:a>RD!\NCE wrrn APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STA1E & I.ŒAL REqJIREMENrS. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION BY DEPARTMENT: ~ ...., 525-010-40 CONSTRUCTION OGC - 01/02 Page 12 of 12 AGENCY NAME & BilLING ADDRESS FPN. NO. ST A.T£ OF FLOf'lIDA DEPAATME~T OF TRANSPORTATION LOCAl AGENCY PROGRAM AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROJECT DESCRIPTION Name MIDWAY ROAD PD&E STUDY S.R. 5 (U.S. I) TO SOUTH 25TH STREET Length ].4 MILES Termini FUNDING (1) (2) (3) TOTAL AGENCY STATE & TYPE OF WORK PROJECT FUNDS FUNDS FEDERAL FUNDS P.E. a. Agency Work b. Other c. Department Services d. Total PE Cost (a+b+c) Rlght-of.Way e. Agency Work f. Other g. Department Services h. Total Right-of-Way Cost (e+f+g) Construction i. Contract j. Other k. Other I. Other m. Total Contracl Costs (i+ +k+l) Construction Engineering n. Agency o. Other p. Department Forces q. Total Construction Engineering (n+o+p) r. Total Construction Cost (m+q) s. ESTIMATED TOTAL C?ST OF THE PROJECTfd+h+,1 PD&E STUDY) $655,803.00 '- "'" PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDIES GUIDE SCOPE OF WORK EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES \w ...., TABLE OF CONTENTS - STANDARD PD&E SCOPE PAGE I. PURPOSE ............................................................. 1 II. STUDY OBJECTIVE A. General Objective. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 B. Specific Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 III. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT A. General ............................................................. 3 B. Public Involvement Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 C. Public Meetings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 D. Public Hearing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 E. Public Involvement Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 F. Newsletters and Flyers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 IV. ENGINEERING DATA COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND REPORTS A. General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 B. Engineering Data Collection ................................................ 6 1. Aerial Photography ................................................. 7 2. Existing Highway Characteristics ...................................... 7 3. Traffic Data ....................................................... 8 4. Accident Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5. Utilities and Railroads ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6. Transportation Plans ............................................... 10 7. Soils Survey and Geotechnical Work .................................. 10 8. Surveys .......................................................... 18 C. Engineering Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 l. Project Need ........................................................... 23 2. Design Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3. Corridor Analysis ....................................................... 23 4. Conceptual Design Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5. Conceptual Drainage Analysis .............................................24 6. Cost Analysis .......................................................... 24 7. Comparative Analysis of Design Alternatives .................................25 8. Access Management. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 9. Conceptual Traffic Control Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 10. Prepare Final Recommendation ........................................... 25 · , '- ....., D. Engineering Reports ........................................................ 25 1. Corridor Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 2. Project Concept Summary ................................................ 26 3. Preliminary Engineering Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 4. Alternative Concept Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5. Preliminary Drainage Report ..............................................27 6. Utility and Railroad Coordination Package ................................... 27 7. Value Engineering Information Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 8. Location Hydraulics Report ............................................... 29 9. Design Traffic Memo .................................................... 29 10. Right of Way Maps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 V. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND REPORTS A. General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 B. Analysis of Social Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 1. Land Use Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 2. Cultural Features. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3. Analysis of Social-Economic Impacts .......................................36 4. Right of Way Acquisition/Relocation Data Collection and Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 5. Archaeological and Historical Features ......................................37 6. Determination of Section 4(f) Involvement ...................................37 7. Visual/Aesthetic Impact Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 8. Farmlands Impact Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 C. Analysis of Natural Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 1. Hydrologic and Natural features. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 2. Identify Permit Conditions .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38 3. Wetland Impact Analysis .................................................38 4. Conceptual Mitigation Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 5. Biological Assessment Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 6. Wildlife and Habitat Impact Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 D. Analysis of Physical Impacts .............................................. 38 1. Air Quality Data Collection and Impact Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2. Noise Impact Data Collection and Analysis .................................. 39 3. Contamination Impact Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 4. Water Quality Impact Analysis ............................................ 39 5. Floodplain Impact Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6. Construction Impact Analysis ............................................. 39 7. Coastal Barrier Impact Analysis ........................................... 39 E. Environmental Reports ................................................... 40 1. Advance Notification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 2. Categorical Exclusion ................................................... 40 3. Other Environmental Reports .............................................40 '- ...., VI. STUDY REQUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS FOR WORK A. Governing Regulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 B. Project Schedule ........................................................ 42 C. Key Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 D. Progress Reporting ...................................................... 42 E. Meetings and Presentations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 F. Quality Control ......................................................... 42 G. Correspondence.................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 H. Liaison Office. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43 I. Optional Services ........................................................ 43 1. Submittals.................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 K. Computer Automation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 VII. METHOD OF COMPENSA nON ......................................... 45 VIII. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY SLC ................................. 46 w ,..., SECTION I. PURPOSE The purpose of this Exhibit is to describe the scope of work and the responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and St. Lucie County (SLC) in connection with the Project Plaruùng (Corridor Location), Preliminary Engineering (Conceptual Design), and Environmental Studies necessary to comply with Department procedures and to obtain Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Location and Design Concept Approval of proposed improvements to this transportation facility. The CONSULTANT shall perform those engineering services required for location/design studies, including consideration of all social, economic, environmental effects, and mitigation as required by the FHW A and/or the Project Development and Environmental Manual, along with the required environmental documents, engineering reports, preliminary plans, public hearing, and right -of-way maps. The SLC will provide contract administration and provide management services and technical reviews of all work associated with the development and preparation of the engineering/environmental study reports for the transportation facility. The Florida Department ofTransportation (DEPARTMENT) District 4 (DISTRICT) is responsible for final quality assurance and the administrative processing of all environmental documentation. A-I \w- ..., SECTION II. STUDY OBJECTIVE A. GENERAL OBJECTIVE: The general obj ective of the study is to provide documented information necessary for SLC to reach a decision on the type, design, and location of improvements to this transportation facility. The Project Development Process shall follow the Florida Department of Transportation Department publication titled "Project Development and Environment Guidelines", published 07-01-88 and all subsequent revisions. Throughout this Scope of Services portion ofthis CONSULTANT Contract, the publication will be referred to as the "PD&E Manual". The PD&E Manual incorporates all the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A); Federal law and executive orders; applicable Federal regulations included in the Federal Highway Administration Federal-Aid Policy Guide; and applicable State laws and regulations including Chapter 339.155 of the Florida Statutes. The project documentation prepared by the CONSULTANT in accordance with the PD&E Manual shall therefore be in compliance with all applicable State and Federal laws, executive orders, and regulations. Sections ill, IV and V of the Scope of Services will establish which items of work described in the PD&E Manual are specifically included in this contract, and also which ofthe items of work will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT or SLC. B. SPECIFIC PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The CONSULTANT is to study the: widening of Midway Road from 2 lanes to 4 lanes between SR 5 (U.S. I ) and S. 25th Street. Included in the study will be consideration of special treatment and/or additional lanes at major intersections, and widening of crossroads up to 600 feet in each direction where necessary to provide operation at an improved Level of Service. (D or higher). The CONSULTANT shall consider at least three corridors for the project. For widening on the existing roadway alignment, the CONSULTANT shall consider alternatives to the left of, to the right of, and centered on the existing alignment. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate Context Sensitive Design (CSD) into the projects. A-2 \..: .....1 SECTION III. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT A. GENERAL: Public involvement is an important aspect ofthe project development process. Public involvement includes communicating and interacting with all interested individuals, groups, and government organizations about information regarding the development ofthe project. This communication and interaction is accomplished through various meetings, publications, and media releases. The focus ofthese activities is to develop a cooperative working relationship between the public and SLC, and to identify the public's issues, needs and concerns. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate and perform the appropriate level of public involvement for this project as outlined in Part I, Chapter 8 ofthe PD&E Manual; the District N Formal Presentation Guidelines for Public Meetings and Hearings; and the following sections. Within one month from the NTP, the CONSULTANT shall provide this project's Public Involvement Plan to be approved by SLC. B. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM: The CONSULT ANT will provide a Public Involvement Program for the project. The CONSULTANT's Public Involvement Program shall be specifically detailed in the PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN for the project. Part I, Chapter 8 of the PD&E Manual provides the requirements of the plan. The Public Involvement Plan documents how the cooperative relationship will be developed during the project's duration. The plan shall include: the project's purpose and background; history of previous public involvement efforts, issues identified and assumed; strategies on resolving difficult issues; an action plan on how information will be conveyed to and collected from the public; a schedule of key elements; list of regular council and subcommittee monthly meeting days, description of collateral materials to be produced; and the project mailing list. C. PUBLIC MEETINGS: The CONSULTANT shall provide all support necessary for SLC to hold various public meetings, which may include: - Kickoff or introductory meeting. - Citizens Advisory Committee Meetings. A-3 "-"' 'WI - Scoping Meetings. - Public Information Meetings, including a possible Alternatives Public Meeting. For any of the above type meetings, the CONSULTANT shall prepare and/or provide: - Scripts or agenda for presentation. - Graphics for presentation. - Minutes ofthe meetings. - Meeting equipment set-up and tear-down. - Legal and/or display advertisements. The CONSULTANT will pay the cost of publishing. - Letters for notification of elected and appointed officials. News releases, for use three to five days prior to meeting. All postage will be paid by the CONSULTANT for all meeting notifications. The CONSULTANT will investigate potential meeting sites to advise the SLC on their suitability. The CONSULTANT will pay all costs for meeting site rents, security, and court reporting. The CONSULTANT will attend the meetings with an appropriate number of his personnel to assist the SLC Project Manager. D. PUBLIC HEARING: The CONSULT ANT shall provide all support necessary for SLC to hold the Public Hearing required by the PD&E Manual and the District 4 Public Hearing Guidelines. The CONSULTANT shall provide all the support services listed in Paragraph III. C. above, and in addition shall prepare and/or provide: - Property owner letters. (English Only) The CONSULT ANT will provide marked tax maps of the project alternatives and identify the names and addresses of the property owners from county tax rolls. The CONSULTANT will prepare the letters, insert them in envelopes, and address the envelopes. The CONSULTANT will pay for postage. - A script for and a professional voice-over tape recorded presentation, including synchronization with 35 mID color slides, a video presentation, or a computerized presentation. - Camera-ready graphics, the 35 mID color slides, a video presentation, or a computerized presentation including oblique aerial photographs or aerial video of the project area. A-4 '-' -....I - Displays of plans and report(s) for display to the public for 35 (approximate) days prior to the hearing. - Brochures or handouts. - Legal and/or display advertisements. The CONSULTANT will pay the cost of publishing. The CONSULTANT will draft public advertisements and provide to the District's Environmental Management Office for review before publication. - Court reporter. - Security (Off duty law enforcement officer) The CONSULTANT will procure a verbatim transcript ofthe Public Hearing. The CONSULT ANT will combine the transcript with any letters received by SLC as part ofthe public hearing record, and affidavits of publication oflegal ads, and will reproduce ten (10) copies of the transcript for SLC use. The CONSULTANT will also prepare a Public Hearing Summary. The CONSULTANT will prepare a legal or display advertisement for Location and Concept approval notification. The CONSULTANT will pay the cost of publishing. E. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT DATA: The CONSULTANT is to collect the following data: - Mailing list preparation. This process involves the identification of any affected, possible affected and interested parties early in the study process and during the life ofthe project. - Elected and appointed officials in the area (city, state, county) and community leaders should be identified and placed on the mailing list of officials and interested parties. - Possible permit and review agencies should be identified and placed on the mailing list of officials and interested parties. - Media in the project area should be identified and placed on a mailing list to be used for news releases, advertisements or any concerns. - The mailing list of officials and interested parties, shall also include any person or institution expressing an interest in the project. A-S \.f 'wi The collection of public input occurs throughout the life ofthe project and requires maintaining of files, updating the mailing list, newspaper clippings, letters, and especially direct contacts before, during and after any of the public meetings. In addition to collecting public input data, the CONSULT ANT shall assist SLC in preparing responses to any public inquires as a result ofthe public involvement process. 6. NEWSLETTERS AND FLYERS: The CONSULTANT shall prepare 2 editions of an English (only), multicolor newsletter and duplicate, each newsletter edition requires 1500 copies. Distribution shall be through the project mailing list and hand delivered to various locations as appropriate. The postage will be paid by the CONSULTANT. 7. WEB SITE: The CONSULTANT will establish a web site to assist with Public involvement for this project, including but not limited to input via email, contact information, and links to other appropriate web sites as deemed necessary by ST. LUCIE COUNTY. SECTION IV. ENGINEERING DATA COLLECTION. ANALYSIS AND REPORTS A. GENERAL: The CONSULTANT shall perform the services outlined in this section necessary to develop engineering alternatives that satisfy the project's need. This effort consists of collecting essential data, analyzing and comparing viable alternatives, and documenting engineering decisions and recommendations. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate and perform the appropriate level of engineering analysis for this project as outlined in Part I, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual and the following sections. B. ENGINEERING DATA COLLECTION: Immediately following the Advance Notification, the CONSULTANT shall begin preliminary assessments of the study corridor from an engineering standpoint. This task is largely of a data gathering nature. This activity consists of collecting various information and materials relative to the performance of engineering analyzes within the study area. The information should include all data necessary to perform adequate evaluation ofthe location and design of a transportation facility. A-6 ~ 'WI 1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY: Controlled Aerial Photography (Midway Road Corridor Only) shall be used as a basis for plotting various data necessary for both engineering and environmental analysis, alternative corridor and design studies, and the development of the preliminary plans of conceptual design. Copies of aerial photography are the prime source of information used to convey project considerations to the public at public meetings. Uncontrolled Aerial Photography shall be used for Alternate Corridor Analysis. The CONSULTANT will furnish the necessary aerial photography to be used in the study. Aerial photography shall be prepared for the following uses at the noted scales: - Overall Project Location Map - Drainage master Plan - Corridor Location Maps - Alternative Plans - Tree Location I" =40' I" = 200' I" = 200' 1" =40' 1" =40' The primary unit for this project is ENGLISH (U.S. Customary Unit). Sheet size shall be in accordance with FDOT' s Roadway Plans Preparation Manual (English, January 2000). The CONSULTANT shall develop a Microstation CADD data base compatible for use on aerial photography. In developing CADD system data the consultant shall adhere to the FDOT'S Roadway Plans Preparation Manual(English, January 2000), FDOT CADD Procedures Manual and other procedures or special instructions, as appropriate in the performance of these services. 2. EXISTING HIGHWAY CHARACTERISTICS: The CONSULTANT shall be responsible to procure all the engineering data listed in Part I, Chapter 9, of the PD&E Manual necessary to conduct a PD&E study and prepare a Preliminary Engineering Report. The CONSULTANT shall develop a Microstation CADD data base that includes all existing highway characteristics. CADD data base information shall be compatible for use on aerial photography used for public hearing presentations, corridor maps, and alternative plans. A-7 ...... ...., 3. TRAFFIC DATA: The CONSULTANT will furnish the following initial traffic data: Three day (72 hour) mid-week, bidirectional ADT Link Counts at 15 minute intervals with hourly and 24 hour totals at the following locations: 1. Midway Road West ofSR 5 (US.1) 2. Midway Road West of Oleander Avenue 3. Midway Road West of Sunrise Avenue 4. Midway Road East of South 25th Street 5. Oleander Avenue North of Midway Road. 6. Oleander Avenue South of Midway Road 7. Sunrise Blvd. North of Midway Road 8. Sunrise Blvd. South of Midway Road 9. S. 25th Street North of Midway Road 10. S. 25th Street South of Midway Road The CONSULTANT will provide two day (48 hour) Vehicle Classification bidirectional counts at hourly intervals with 24 hour totals at the following locations: 1. Midway Road West ofSR 5 (U.S.I) 2. Midway Road West of Oleander Avenue 3. Midway Road West of Sunrise Avenue 4. Midway Road East of South 25th Street The CONSULT ANT will provide three day 6- Hour Turning Movement Counts atthe following intersections: 1. Midway Road & SR 5 (U.S. 1 ) 2. Midway Road & Oleander Avenue 3. Midway Road & Sunrise Avenue 4. Midway Road & South 25th Street The turning movement surveys will be conducted during the following time periods: AM 07:00 - 09:00 MD 11 :00 - 13:00 PM 16:00 - 18:00 A-8 '-' 'w1I The turning movement surveys will be conducted midweek with concurrent ADT data collection. All traffic and turning movement data will be provided to SLC both hardcopy and electronic format. The electronic format for ADT counts must be compatible with the FDOT's Survey Processing Software (SPS). The electronic copy of the turning movement data must be compatible with Petra for Windows software and Traffic Operations and Planning Software (TOPS). The CONSULTANT will furnish any additional field data as mutually agreed upon as required for this project by both SLC and the CONSULTANT. SLC and the DEPARTMENT will furnish the 20 year Corridor Design Traffic and turning movements with K30, D3o, and 24 hour T factors, from the MPO 2025 Plan or from another FSUTMS year run. 4. ACCIDENT DATA: The CONSULTANT shall obtain available data from local sources for various highway segments required. Obtain data for previous five years. The data collected shall include number and type of accidents, accident locations, number of fatalities and injuries, and estimates of property damage and economic loss. Any costs (Local Government or agency fees) associated with obtaining Accident Data shall be borne by SLC. 5. UTILITIES AND RAILROADS: The CONSULTANT shall identify the following existing and proposed utilities which may influence location and design considerations: - Overhead: Transmission lines, microwave towers, telephone lines, etc. - Underground: Water, gas, sanitary sewer, force mains, power cables, telephone cables, etc. - Bridge Attachments The CONSULTANT shall identify existing and proposed railroads, including proposed abandonments, which may influence location and design considerations. A-9 \.t ..I 6. TRANSPORTATION PLANS: The CONSULTANT shall obtain plans for all modes of transportation including surface, transit and non-motorized modes. The following plans or studies should be obtained: - Urban Area Transportation Study. If applicable, County Cost Feasible and Needs Plans. - Local Comprehensive Plans; city and county. - Transit; rail, bus, other. - Non-motorized modes, including bikeways and pedestrian walkways. Interview local officials and identify the following factors: Existing and projected user types; Generators attracting users; Existing and anticipated hazards; High accident locations. 7. SOILS SURVEY AND GEOTECHNICAL WORK: The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for a complete geotechnical investigation. All work performed by the CONSULTANT shall be in accordance with FDOT standards, the Soils and Foundations Manual (February 1999), related directives, Federal Highway Administration Checklist and Guidelines for review of Geotechnical Reports and Preliminary Plans and Specifications, F.H.W.A. W orkZone Traffic Control Practices Manual and Pavement Coring and Evaluation Procedure(Topic No. 675-030-005-c). The County Engineer will make all determinations regarding FDOT geotechnical standards, policies and procedures. Soils surveys shall not be commenced until Location and Design Concept Acceptance has been received, unless special soils conditions or project requirements require subsoil investigations to assist in route preparation. Prior to beginning the investigation and no later than 30 days after the Notice to Proceed is given, the CONSULTANT shall meet with St Lucie County's County Engineer or representative to review the project scope and FDOT requirements. 1. Field Investigation - Roadway: The soils investigation for roadways shall include, but not be limited to: 1. One 5 foot auger boring per 100 feet per each roadway. 2. One 20-foot auger boring per 500 feet of alignment. A-lO \.t ...; 3. Soil samples for laboratory soil testing will be obtained on a minimum frequency of2 samples per stratum per 3000 feet. 4. Soil samples for pipe corrosion testing will be obtained on a minimum frequency of 1 sample per stratum per 2500 feet of alignment. 5. Pavement cores will be obtained as directed at the scope meeting. 6. Use U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps to identify areas of organic soils. 7. Determine the vertical and horizontal extent of compressible strata (i.e. muck, peat, clay, etc.). The following boring and testing frequency will be performed for exploration of stormwater management areas: 8. A minimum of two 20 foot auger borings and I field permeability test per one acre of stormwater pond. 9. Auger borings and permeability tests as necessary in exfiltration trench areas. Permeability tests must be done as indicated in the Soils and Foundations Manual. 10. Double ring infiltrometer tests for swale areas. Optional Preliminary Contamination Assessment (PCA) - At FDOT's discretion, a PCA may be required on a per site basis. All work shall be performed in accordance with the current DER and OSHA standards. The following work items shall be included but not be limited to: 11. A minimum of four borings will be required per site. 12. Soil gas analysis will be required by use of a flame ionization detector [i.e. OV A(Organic Vapor Analyzer), etc.]. 13. Installation of monitoring wells may be required. 14. Water sampling and laboratory analysis may be required (Laboratory shall be HRS certified). A-ll '-" ...." 15. A PCA report will be required. 2. Laboratorv Testing(Roadwav and Structures): All laboratory testing will be performed in accordance with Florida Sampling and Testing Methods (FSTM) or ASTM or by related directives. Laboratory testing will include the following as required by the needs of the project and the type of soils encountered during the investigation: 1. Organic Content (FM 1- T 267) 2. Moisture Content (FMI-T 265) 3. Sieve Analysis (FM 1- T 088) 4. Particle Size Analysis with hydrometer (FM I-T 088) 5. Specific Gravity (FM I-T 100) 6. Torvane Sensitivity 7. Atterberg Limits (FM 1- T 89/90) 8. Consolidation (pM 1-T 216) * 9. Triaxial (FM I-T 234) 10. Corrosion Series PH (FM 5-550) Resistivity (FM 5-551) Chloride Content (FM 5-552) Sulfate Content (FM 5-553) 11. Limerock Bearing Ratio (pM 5-515) 12. Aggregate Gradation (FM I-T 30) 13. Bitumen Extraction (pM 1-T 164) * With an unload/reload cycle near the preconso1idation pressure. A-12 -... ..., 3. Roadwav Report: The roadway report shall include, but not be limited to: 1. Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits and beginning/ending station shown. 2. A report oftests sheet which summarizes the laboratory test results, the soil stratification(i.e. soils grouped into layers of similar materials) and construction recommendations relative to Standard Indices 500 and 505. All soils should be classified according to the AASHTO Classification System. 3. Estimated seasonal high and/or low groundwater levels. 4. The design LBR value. 5. Permeability parameters for water retention areas. 6. The existing pavement section and asphalt composition for possible reuse or grade control, if warranted. 7. A description of the site and subsoil conditions, design recommendations and a discussion of any special considerations (i.e. removal of unsuitable material, recompression of weak soils, stabilization, estimated settlement time/amount, groundwater control etc.). 8. An appendix which contains stratified soil boring profiles, laboratory test data sheets, design LBR calculation/graphs, and any other pertinent information. In addition to the roadway report, the CONSULTANT will also plot the stratified boring profiles on the original roadway cross-sections and have the Geotechnical Subconsultant review for completeness. A draft ofthe roadway report shall be submitted to the County Engineer for review prior to incorporation of the CONSULTANT's recommendations in the project design. 4. Field Investigation - Structures: The geotechnical investigation for structural foundations includes bridges, box culverts, retaining walls, sea walls, high A-13 '-' -..",I mast lighting, Mastarms, overhead signing and high embankment fills as required. The investigation shall include, but not be limited to: 1. Standard Penetration Test (STP) borings or Cone Penetration Test (CPT) sounding at each bridge bent/pier location or at the maximum interval of 100 feet. 2. SPT borings or CPT soundings 100 feet behind each abutment as a minimum for exploration of high fill areas. 3. SPT borings or CPT soundings at a maximum interval of 150 feet along proposed retaining wall locations. 4. At least 2 SPT borings at proposed box culvert locations. 5. All SPT borings are to be sampled on maximum intervals of2.5 to 3 foot centers. 6. Continuous SPT sampling is recommended in the top 15 feet unless the material is unacceptable as a foundation material. 7. Undisturbed samples of cohesive soils obtained in accordance with FDOT standards. 8. Rock coring when hard rock is encountered. A Standard Penetration Test (SPT) shall be performed at the bottom of each core run. Core runs shall not be longer than 6 feet. 9. Additional specialized field testing as required by needs ofproject. Field sampling and testing is also to include the testing of soils, and/or water for the determination of environmental class for the substructure and superstructure, and measurement of d50 and evaluation of angle of repose for channel bed soils. SPT borings or CPT soundings including an analysis of foundation alternates shall be performed if justified by the inclusion of signing and/or lighting foundations. This effort shall include field work, lab testing, data reduction, analysis and recommendations. A-14 "-' ~ 5. Structures Report: The structures report shall contain the following discussions as appropriate for the assigned project: 1. Summary of structure background data. 2. Analysis of structure foundation alternatives including the following: - Spread footings -Prestressed concrete piling - various sizes (SPT97.EXE) - Steel H-piles (SPILE) - Steel pipe piles (STP97.EXE) -Drilled shafts - various sizes (FHW A Drilled Shaft Manual- Reese/O'Neill or UF Research Report D647F as appropriate) - Other feasible foundation types 3. Recommendations for most practical foundations types will be given along with the basis for selection. 4. Analysis of allowable and/or ultimate foundation capacity and settlement potential for all feasible alternatives. Foundation capacity analyses shall be performed using the methods listed above or a County approved alternate. For pile foundations, provide graphs of design soil resistance versus estimated minimum/maximum pile tip elevations (Adjusted for scour if necessary). 5. Analysis of lateral load capacities. 6. Evaluation of external stability for conventional retaining walls and retained/reinforced earth wall systems (FHW A-RD-89-043, 11/90). 7. Evaluation of Embankment Slope Stability (PCSTABL) and Settlement. 8. Evaluation of Sheet Piling (CW ALSHT) A-IS \w ""'" 9. Draft of detailed boring/sounding standard sheet, including environmental classification and specialized construction requirements, for inclusion in final construction plans. 10. Summary of soil test results including the following: (1) Unit Weight (2) Consolidation parameters (3) Cohesion (4) Friction angle for cohesionless soils (5) Strain at 50% stress level from UU Triaxial compression (6) Modulus of sub grade reaction (7) Other pertinent test results 11. Evaluation of lateral earth pressures on underground structures (i.e. box culverts, retaining walls, etc.). 12. Shallow foundation bearing capacity(i.e. allowable bearing pressure, minimum footing width, and minimum embedment depth). 13. Construction information addressing the following items: (1) Estimated maximum driving resistance anticipated for pile foundations. (2) Recommendations for footing or shaft installation, or other site preparation soils-related construction considerations with plan sheets as necessary. A-16 '-' ~ (3) Recommend quantity, location and length of test piles with or without instrumentation and a recommendation on the use of load tests. 14. An Appendix which includes SPT and CPT boring/sounding profiles, data from any specialized field tests, laboratory test data sheets, engineering analysis notes/sample calculations and any other pertinent information. A draft of the structures report shall be submitted to the County Engineer for review prior to incorporation of the CONSULTANT's recommendations in the project design. 1. Final Analysis and Reports: Separate final engineering reports will be submitted for roadway and structures projects. These final reports will incorporate comments of the St. Lucie County Engineer and contain any additional field or laboratory test results, recommended foundation alternatives along with design parameters and special provisions for the construction plans. These reports will be submitted to the County Engineer for review prior to project completion. After review by the County Engineer, the reports will be submitted in final form and will include the following: 1. Six copies of the Structures report. 2. All original plan sheets. 3. One set of reproducible mylars. 4. Two sets of record prints. 5. Six sets of any special provisions. 6. Two copies of Roadway reports. 7. All reference and support documentation used in preparation of contract plans package. The final roadway and structure reports, as well as plan sheets, will be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Florida. A-17 '-" ...I 2. Provisions for Work: The proposal will show the base unit costs and shall state the upset limit fee estimated to complete this activity. Negotiated unit estimates may vary to meet the project requirements. Prices will adhere to the fee schedule and remain under the upset limit. Actual payment for the geotechnical investigation will be based on the work actually performed at the unit prices stipulated in the price proposal. 8. SURVEYS: 1. General: The CONSULT ANT shall perform a complete English field survey necessary to prepare the Right of Way Control Survey, Right of Way Maps, Legal Descriptions, Engineering Design and/or Construction Plans. This work must comply with the "Minimum Technical Standards for Land Surveyors", Chapter 61 G 17-6, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 472.027; the Department of Environmental Protection requirements for State Jurisdiction Boundary Surveys, pursuant to Chapter 177.25 - 177.40, Florida Statutes; and any special instructions from the District Location Surveyor and the District Right of Way Surveyor.. 1. All survey work shall be made to conform to the Florida State System of Plane Coordinates, using the North American Datum of 1983 (1990 or most recent adjustment) for horizontal control, and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NA VD 1988) for vertical control. The surveyor shall comply at all times with applicable Federal, State, and local laws, provisions and policies governing safety and health. This includes Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1910 and 1976, Occupational Safety and Health Regulations, including confined space entry requirements for General Industry and Construction, including any subsequent revisions and updates. To safely conduct the public through the work area full compliance with the current Department Roadway and Traffic Design Standards (600 Series) and Survey Safety Handbook is a minimum requirement. 2. Prior to work commencing, the CONSULTANT shall attend a kick off meeting with St. Lucie County. The standard requirements as well as the sequence of survey operations will be reviewed and discussed. Survey work shall not begin until authorized by SLC. A-IS ~ -..J B. Equipment: The survey must be performed by using automated survey equipment that is compatible with the FDOT's Electronic Field Book Processing Standards. All field survey data shall be delivered to St. Lucie County in an electronic format that can be directly input and used (without having to be edited) in FDOT's computer system. The data must be submitted for approval as segments are completed, not at the end of the survey. C. Aerial Format: If aerial photography is utilized, it will be processed and prepared in accordance with Mapping Procedure No. 550-020-002-D, and will include Right of Way photo base maps on approved format according to the Location Survey Manual. The CONSULT ANT will furnish St. Lucie County with the original negatives and contact prints of all aerial flights, and an index file in .dgn format depicting the limits of the photography. D. Design Survey: Design survey services shall be performed in a manner that will perpetuate the control and reference system through the construction and final activities. These activities may include, but shall not be limited to, the following: 1. Geodetic Control - Perform a geodetic baseline control survey for the purpose of establishing the alignment ofthe project and providing an adjusted network of control meeting FDOT's specifications. 2. Alignments - Sufficient field control will be located to determine the alignments of dedicated Right of Ways according to recorded instruments of conveyance, Right of Way maps, and subdivision plats. If a previous or "Historical" baseline exists, it must be recovered and staked as the current Baseline of Survey. In hazardous situations, an offset reference line may be established and stationed, but the control points on the "Historical" baseline must be set. Before staking either line in the field, the alignment must be reviewed and approved by SLC. 3. Reference Points - Reference all survey control points, in accordance with procedures. A-19 '-' ...¡ 4. Aerial Targets - Place aerial targets in accordance with the Location Survey Manual. 5. Bench Levels: - Establish a bench line using the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NA VD 88), unless otherwise instructed by the District Administrator of Surveying and Mapping. For each bench mark set or used, a bench mark description form will be filled out and submitted (along with the field books) to St. Lucie County. 6. Topographv - Make a complete topographic survey within the limits of the project. Topography will be collected by automated means using an electronic field book (EFB) or other compatible software, unless otherwise instructed in writing, by St. Lucie County. 7. Roadway Cross-Sections and Profiles - Gather data for digital terrain model (DTM) and cross-sections for the entire limits of the project. 8. Side Street Surveys - Make complete side street surveys in accordance with the Location Survey Manual. 9. Underground Utilities - Locate underground utilities both vertically and horizontally in accordance with the Plan Preparation Manual and the Location Survey Manual, Topic Numbers 550-030-001 and 004. 10. Drainage Survey - Perform a drainage survey. The CONSULTANT may use aerial photography or conduct a standard field survey. The CONSULTANT may utilize existing topographic references, such as USGS Quadrangle Maps. All prominent features are to be verified by the CONSULTANT during actual on site investigation or field survey. If the CONSULTANT utilizes aerial photography, spot elevations will be shown on the aerials. Sufficient elevations will be shown to enable the CONSULTANT'S drainage engineer to determine direction of flow relative to SLC Right of Way. 11. Bridge Data Survev - Make a complete structural control survey ofthe bridge site. 12. Outfall. Detention and Mitigation Survev - Conduct any necessary outfall, detention pond, and mitigation area surveys. A-20 \..' ...." 13. Stake-Out for Borings - Provide alignment stake out for subsoil investigation, as directed. E. Right of Way Surveys: Right of Way Surveys will include all of the elements previously outlined under Design Surveys, plus the following: I. Section Ties - Tie section lines, quarter section lines, (and quarter-quarter section lines when pertinent) to the project control by closed traverse or redundant measurement with G.P.S. All comers found in the field will be properly identified and recorded on forms to be completed and filed with the Department of Environmental Protection, in accordance with Florida Statutes. Furnish St. Lucie County with a copy of the certified comer record which depicts the land comer references. 2. Subdivision Ties - Tie all subdivisions, including block lines and street Right of Way lines, to the project control. All necessary block comers must be found or calculated. Any survey comers that are found must be tied to the Baseline of Survey by closed traverse or through redundant measurements taken from at least two different traverse points. 3. Condominium Ties - The external boundaries of all Planned Unit Developments and the external boundaries of any tract of land that is being developed into individual condominiums, will be treated the same as the subdivisions. If the project's Right of Way requirements affect an individual condominium or the association lands held in common, additional surveying will be required. 4. Maintained Right of Way Survey - The necessary research will be performed and a decision will be made early in the project by St. Lucie County to determine the need for a maintained Right of Way survey. If a maintained Right of Way survey is necessary, the limits of maintenance must be tied to the Baseline of Survey wherever St. Lucie County identifies it. 5. Building Ties - All buildings and improvements within the required Right of Way shall be accurately measured and field tied. Also major buildings and improvements that are within 25 feet of the required Right of Way must be located in the field. A-21 '-" '...I 6. Jurisdictional Line Survey - Make tide line (MHW) surveys where necessary to determine the jurisdictional limits of the Department of Environmental Protection. F. Certified Right of Way Control Survey Drawings: The consultant will prepare a drawing representing the results of the Right of Way Control Survey. This drawing should be presented for review at the same time the 30% Right of Way Maps are submitted. When submitting for review, furnish full size copies of all plats, tax maps, drainage and flood control district maps, prior Right of Way Maps, private surveys, field notes, etc. After the Control Survey Drawing has been reviewed and approved by the District Right of Way Surveyor, the original Mylar drawings will be signed by the District Right of Way Surveyor and returned for certification. The CONSULTANT land surveyor in responsible charge shall certify this drawing as a Right of Way Control Survey which meets "Minimum Technical Standards", Chapter 61G17-6, Florida Administrative Code. The final deliverable will be in the form of a signed and sealed blueprint. The Control Survey drawing must consist ofthe following: 1. Sheet 1 (Cover Sheet) - This sheet will contain all pertinent general notes, references, the certification, a location map, etc. (See District 4 sample drawings.) 2. Kev Sheet - This sheet will contain the land sections broken down into quarters, including all bearings and distances. Complete baseline alignment data, including begin and end survey flags with stations, must be shown. 3. Standard Detail Sheets - The detail sheets must conform to the following: 1. If a previous or "Historical" baseline exists, it must be used as the current Baseline of Survey. Show the complete baseline alignment, including begin and end survey flags with stations, all control points, curve data and the bearings on all tangent lines. The control points must be identified as to whether they were set or found, the size and type marker that was used, surveyor's identification number, etc. If a hazardous situation required an offset reference line to be established and stationed, it is to be shown on the Project Network Control sheet only, where ties will be shown to the major control points on the "Historical" baseline.) All Existing Rights of Way, both along the highway and on intersecting streets or roads, must be shown. Include bearings and dimensions as well as stations and offsets. A-22 '-" ....I 2. All section lines, quarter section lines, (and quarter-quarter section lines when pertinent) that lie within a half mile ofthe project must be shown. When these lines intersect the baseline, show the station where their intersection occurs, a distance from the baseline to the nearest comer in each direction, and the bearings and distances between comers. Each comer should be identified as calculated or found, and if found, the size and type of material must be described. 3. The external boundaries of all Planned Unit Developments and the external boundaries of any tract of land that is being developed into individual condominiums, will be treated the same as the plats. Bearings, dimensions, stations and offsets must be shown, along with survey monuments found on these property lines. If the project's Right of Way requirements affect an individual condominium or the association lands held in common, additional information will have to be shown. 4. Proiect Network Control Sheet - Make a separate sheet graphically depicting the baseline, the benchmarks, the primary and secondary control points and their reference points. Indicate the type of material used for each point. Also, a table must be shown listing all control points, their XYZ coordinates, scale factors, convergence angles and a description of the type of survey markers set. This sheet shall be submitted to St. Lucie County and the District Location Surveyor. C. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS: Utilizing the data collected as part of this scope of work, the CONSULTANT shall perform the engineering analysis necessary to complete the project development process described in Part I, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual. The task of engineering analysis will be ongoing throughout the duration ofthe project and will be performed with consideration to the results ofthe environmental impacts analysis. 1. PROJECT NEED: The CONSULT ANT shall establish and/or verify the purpose and need for the project as outlined in Part 2, Chapter 5 of the PD&E Manual. A-23 ~ ..J 2. DESIGN TRAFFIC: SLC and the DEPARTMENT will provide the traffic projections to be used to establish the basic design requirements for roadway typical sections, intersection, and interchange design.. SLC and the DEPARTMENT will provide the 20 year Corridor Design traffic and turning movements with K30, D3o, and 24 hour T factors. The CONSULTANT shall analyze the traffic data for each viable corridor and design alternative, as appropriate. 3. CORRIDOR ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall investigate the area surrounding the existing facility to determine reasonable corridor alternative considerations. No more than three alternative corridors will be investigated. The CONSULTANT shall use aerial photography to identify possible corridor locations while giving consideration to the following alignment controls which may influence corridor location: - A vailableright-of-waythrough which an improvement providing acceptable level- of-service could be routed. - Cultural features including public and private development. - Natural features which could be impacted by the project. - Logical termini giving consideration to directness, length, and service. The CONSULTANT shall analyze and evaluate each corridor alternate to a point of rejection or selection as a viable corridor. The impacts for each alternate shall be identified and expressed in a form suitable for comparison to other corridor alternates. It will be necessary to analyze in sufficient detail to identify enough differences to select the most viable corridor(s) that would be in the best overall public interest, or to document that no feasible alternative corridors are available. 4. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ANALYSIS: After selection of viable corridor( s), the CONSULT ANT shall develop and analyze alternate conceptual design alignments as described in Part 1, Chapter 9 ofthe PD&E Manual. Up to three alternate alignments may be developed in each corridor. A-24 '-' ....¡ 5. CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall perform preliminary drainage design in order to determine potential outfall locations and preliminary sizes (volume and area) of required detention and/or retention facilities for storm water treatment or attenuation. The location and size of potential detention/retention areas will be determined for all viable alternate alignments. 6. COST ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall develop cost estimates for each design alternative, including: - Construction cost estimates for all alternatives. - Estimates of right-of-way acquisition costs, including cost estimates for relocations and business damages. - Estimates of "life cycle" costs for operation and maintenance of alternatives. 7. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DESIGN ALTERNATES: After developing the viable alternate alignments and costs, the CONSULTANT will prepare a matrix comparing the significant impacts and costs of the alternatives evaluated, with a recommendation ofthe most viable alternative(s). The CONSULTANT shall present their recommendations to SLC for consideration. SLC will determine which viable alternative( s) will be evaluated further through the public involvement process and environmental analysis. The possibility exists that the No-Build alternate may be selected at this point. 8. ACCESS MANAGEMENT: The CONSULT ANT shall review Chapter of the SLC Land Development Code and determine the application to the project. 9. CONCEPTUAL TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS The CONSULTANT shall develop conceptual traffic control plans (TCP) that consider staged construction costs, and temporary impacts. The CONSULT ANT shall meet with St. Lucie County to discuss the proposed TCP. The conceptual TCP will be discussed in the Preliminary Engineering Report and drawings depicting the various phases will be included in the Alternative Concept Plans. A-25 \.t ...." 10. PREPARE FINAL RECOMMENDATION: The CONSULTANT shall recommend a preferred alternative based on a review and analysis of all engineering, environmental, and public involvement issues related to the project. D. ENGINEERING REPORTS: The CONSULTANT shall document the results of the data collection efforts and the engineering analysis performed as part of this scope of work. The engineering reports and documents shall be prepared as outlined in Part 1, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual. The task of documentation includes the preparation of draft and interim reports prepared by the CONSULTANT for review and comment upon by SLC prior to producing final reports and documents. 1. CORRIDOR REPORT: The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Corridor Summary to document the results of the corridor analysis. The Corridor Summary shall summarize the project need, discuss the corridors evaluated, and provide a recommendation for the best corridor(s) for further study. 2. PROJECT CONCEPT SUMMARY: The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Project Concept Summary (PCS) according to the PD&E Manual, as discussed in Part I, Chapter 9 regarding the PE Report. The suggested table of contents noted below: 1. PROJECT STATUS 1.1 Project Location and Logical Termini 1.2 Current Funding Amounts and Years Programmed. 1.3 Work Program Update 1.3.1 Construction Cost Estimate 1.3.2 Right of Way Cost Estimate 1.3.3 Project Schedule 1.3.4 Project Limits and Description A-26 \.t ..."J 2. PD&E STUDY APPROACH AND SCHEDULE 2.1 Design Criteria 2.2 Constraints 2.3 Issues 2.4 Special Activities 2.5 Needed PD&E Reports 2.6 PD&E Schedule 3. NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT 3.1 Deficiencies 3.2 Safety 3.3 Consistency with Transportation Plan 3.4 Social and Economic Demands 4. ALTERNATIVES TO BE DEVELOPED 4.1 Typical Sections 4.2 Special Roadway Improvements 4.3 Non Roadway Improvements The CONSULTANT shall provide a Table of Contents, for the PCS, to SLC for review before preparing the draft PCS. 3. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT: The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Preliminary Engineering (P.E.) Report. Included in that report will be Conceptual Plan drawings of all viable alternates, including the recommended alternative. The Concept Plans included in the P .E. Report shall be folded to standard size sheets. The typical sections will be bound in the P.E. Report. Report all of the alternative structural design concepts considered, and the basis for their further consideration or their rejection as being unfeasible or not cost effective. 4. ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT PLANS: The CONSULTANT will draw Concept Plans on Aerial Photography. The Concept Plans will be prepared at a scale of 1 "=40'. In addition, the CONSULTANT will draw an overall location plan of the project alternatives at a ratio of 1 "=200', The Concept Plans will be drawn on standard size 11" X 17" reproducible with standard title boxes. The drawings shall be suitable for public display at meetings and hearings. A-27 '-' ""'" 5. PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Preliminary Drainage Report to document the results ofthe conceptual drainage analysis including the retention/detention pond siting analysis. 6. UTILITY AND RAILROAD COORDINATION PACKAGE: The CONSULTANT shall prepare a utility request package as described in Part 2, Chapter 10 ofthe PD&E Manual. 7. VALUE ENGINEERING INFORMATION REPORT: This project will be subject to a Value Engineering (VE) review during the alternatives analysis activities. VE reviews will be conducted by a multi-disciplined team of SLC personnel whose purpose will be to consider value improvements to proposed concepts and designs. Value Engineering is an event oriented function and will occur at a specific time in the progress of the project. A. The VE review will occur at the end of the alternates analysis phase and before the public hearing. The CONSULTANT should provide the VE team with the materials and information necessary for an effective review and evaluation of the various alternatives and major cost elements of the project. (1) The CONSULTANT Project Manager and other key project personnel shall meet with the VE team to provide a detailed review of the development of the project to date. The information will be presented in conjunction with a report titled "Value Engineering Information Report" (VEIR). This service will be conducted at SLC Office and will include follow-up telephone and written communications. (2) Develop construction costs for each feasible design alternative. Estimated cost should be shown by major elements of each alternative. A-28 '-' """'" (3) Estimated R/W costs for each alternate based upon recent sales of property in the project area. Categorize as follows: (a) R/W to be purchased (no. parcels & cost) (b) Construction easements (no. easements & cost) (c) Business relocations (no. locations & cost) (d) Residential relocations (no. locations & cost) (e) Business damages (no. locations & est. cost) (4) Aerial photography depicting feasible alternatives with R/W items identified as indicated in item (c), above. (5) Traffic Technical Memorandum reviewed and approved by the St. Lucie County. (6) Design traffic analysis. (7) Provide a matrix in a VE format which shows the criteria and the weighted impact used by the CONSULTANT to make design alternative selection decisions. Criteria such as safety, operation and public acceptance must be fully documented. The CONSULTANT shall submit data and information, referenced above, in the format of a Value Engineering Information Report (VEIR), for each VE phase review. The VEIR is to submitted to St. Lucie County Project Manager two (2) weeks prior to the VE team review. A minimum of ten (10) copies of each report is to be provided by the CONSULTANT, to St. Lucie County Project Manager. 8. LOCATION HYDRAULIC REPORT: The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Location Hydraulic Report as described in Part 2, Chapter 24 of the PD&E Manual. The report shall be of the risk assessment level of detail. 9. DESIGN TRAFFIC MEMO: After selection of viable corridor( s), the CONSULTANT will prepare a brief Design Traffic Technical Memorandum. This memorandum will document the methodology used in developing the traffic demand and multi-modal splits (as provided by SLC and the DEPARTMENT), if applicable. The memorandum shall also identify the design traffic A-29 '-' ...., volumes for each corridor alternate, which may include combinations with other modes of transportation (as provided by SLC and the DEPARTMENT). The CONSULT ANT will use the results ofthe traffic data collection activities and the initial traffic data furnished by SLC, as well as all modeling prepared by the SLC and the DEPARTMENT to produce all Level-of-service calculations and documentation in support of the Preliminary Engineering report. After SLC approval ofthe Design Traffic Technical Memorandum, those traffic projections will be used during the study of conceptual design alternatives and for the analysis of any impacts which depend on traffic inputs (i.e. noise impacts and air quality assessments). to. RIGHT OF WAY MAPS: A. General: The CONSULT ANT shall be responsible for the complete preparation of30% Right of Way Maps for the project. Right of Way Key Maps and Detail Sheets shall be prepared in accordance with FDOT's Right of Way Mapping Procedure 550-030-015. Right of Way Maps may be either line drawings or aerial photo base (raster imaging) prepared to FDOT's sheet size and format. The CONSULTANT shall submit Key Maps, Detail Sheets, Ownership Sheet and Legal Descriptions to St. Lucie County and the District Right of Way Surveyor for review at stages of completion as specified herein. The primary media for the submittal of Right of Way Maps and legal descriptions will be electronic. The files may be transmitted on either 3.5 inch diskette using the P.KZIP utility as the compressing software or on compact diskette (CD's) and will be sent in Microstation DGN format. A half-size set of Right of Way Map prints should also accompany the submittal. Aerial Format: If aerial photography is utilized, it will be processed and prepared in accordance with Mapping Procedure No. 550-020-002-D, and will include Right of Way photo base maps on approved format according to the Location Survey Manual. The Consultant will furnish SLC with the original negatives and contact prints of all aerial flights. Digitized Topography from Aerials - Right of Way maps prepared without aerial background shall be submitted as a planimetric containing topography digitized from aerial photography. The topography must be plotted at half- tone. A-3D \.t ..." Raster Images - Right of Way maps prepared with aerial background shall utilize raster images. This submittal must contain one (I) overall mosaic as well as individual sheet mosaics. All images will be supplied on compact diskettes (CD's) and will be at a minimum of 400 dots per inch in either TIFF or HMR format. A coordinate for the lower left-hand comer of each mosaic will be supplied as well as the pixel size to four (4) decimal places. All aerials must be flown at the proper height to obtain correct scale and accuracy and must be in English units. I. CADD Files - The CADD files must adhere to the following: 1. All line work and text must be in one "Main" design file. The file name should be associated with the W.P.I. number. (For example, W.P.I. 4112345 would be named Rl12345.DGN.) 2. The naming conventions for the sheet files and the reference files are available from the Drafting Section at District 4 Surveying and Mapping. 3. Each individual sheet must be its own design file (output file). The sheet files must be created using an approved clip program. They are essentially just the border, the match lines, the north arrow, the title block, and the graphic scale. No line work is to be entered in the sheet files. Only the text shown with the north arrow, in the title block data fields, and if needed, near the match lines, should entered in the individual sheet files. 4. An ASCII text file should be created to contain the text that is entered on the "Tab Sheet." 5. The project must have an index file listing all CADD files. 6. The seed file settings must conform to FDOT's requirements, particularly regarding working units and the global origin. 7. FDOT's cell libraries must be used. A-31 '-' ..., 8. All symbologies (fonts, levels, colors, line styles, line weights, etc.) must exactly conform to District 4 standards. The CONSULTANT shall submit the Right of Way Map to SLC and the DISTRICT at the 30 percent stage of completion. When submitting maps for review, the CONSULTANT shall furnish full size copies of all plats, tax maps, drainage and flood control district maps, prior Right of Way Maps, private surveys, field notes, etc. The title search reports and the construction plans must be provided in the 60% and later submittal packages, but ifthey are available sooner, they should be included with the earlier submittals too. The Right of Way Maps shall be submitted to S1. Lucie County and the District Right of Way Surveyor. B. 30% Maps The 30% Right of Way Maps must include the following: 1. Sheet 1 (Cover Sheet) - This sheet will contain all pertinent general notes, references, a legend, a location map, etc. (See District 4 sample drawings.) 2. Key Sheet - This sheet will contain the land sections broken down into quarters, including all bearings and distances. Complete baseline alignment data, including begin and end survey flags with stations, must be shown. 3. Standard Detail Sheets - The detail sheets must conform to the following: 1. If a previous or "Historical" baseline exists, it must be used as the current Baseline of Survey. Show the complete baseline alignment, including begin and end survey flags with stations, all control points, curve data and the bearings on all tangent lines. The control points must be identified as to whether they were set or found, the size and type marker that was used, surveyor's identification number, etc. (If a hazardous situation required an offset reference line to be established and stationed, it is to be shown on the Project Network Control sheet only, where ties will be shown to the major control points on the "Historical" baseline.) All Existing Rights of Way, both along the highway and on intersecting streets or roads, must be shown. Include bearings and dimensions as well as stations and offsets. 2. All section lines, quarter section lines, (and quarter-quarter section lines when pertinent) that lie within a half mile of the proj ect must be shown. When these lines intersect the baseline, show the station where their intersection A-32 '-" ~ occurs, a distance from the baseline to the nearest comer in each direction, and the bearings and distances between comers. Each comer should be identified as calculated or found, and if found, the size and type of material should be described. 3. External plat boundaries must be shown, including bearings, dimensions, stations and offsets, and any survey monuments found during the survey. The blocks, lots and streets within subdivisions that will be affected by Right of Way acquisition and/or along the project corridor must be shown. Identify all vacated streets within a subdivision, and provide the recording data of the documents releasing the Right of Way. 4. The external boundaries of all Planned Unit Developments and the external boundaries of any tract of land that is being developed into individual condominiums, will be treated the same as the subdivisions. Bearings, dimensions, stations and offsets must be shown, as well as any survey monuments found marking these property lines. Ifthe project's Right of Way requirements affect an individual condominium or the association lands held in common, additional information will have to be shown. 4. Proiect Network Control Sheet - Make a separate sheet graphically depicting the baseline, the benchmarks, the primary and secondary control points, the reference points for these control points and indicating the type of material used for each respective point. In addition, a table must be shown listing all control points, stating the XYZ coordinates, scale factors, convergence angles and a description ofthe type of survey markers set. The CONSULTANT must contact the city and county offices to determine that the maps contain the most current data regarding: - The latest plats or other instruments of conveyance dedicating additional Right of Way. - Any road or street that has been vacated. - The current names of all streets within project limits. - The location of city limits. A-33 \,.- ...., F. TITLE SEARCH REPORTS: SLC will provide the Title Search Reports for the entire corridor and these will be furnished to the CONSULTANT and the District early in the project. A copy of the Title Search Report will be returned to SLC, once the CONSULTANT has identified the Right of Way Map parcel numbers and marked each one on the front sheet of the corresponding report. This should be done as soon as possible. G. TITLE SEARCH MAP: The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Title Search Map when the Title Search Reports are received. A set of full sized prints of the entire corridor will be used for plotting the properties in color, to represent the different ownerships. The corresponding search number must be written on each property. This map will be used by the consultant to insure receipt of title searches for full coverage ofthe entire project. When all of the Title Search Reports have been plotted, this map is to be turned over to SLC. A copy of this Map shall be provided to the District. H. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: Legal descriptions of the parcels of land required for the project shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT and be in accordance with FDOT's Right of Way Mapping Handbook and they must conform to the standards and conventions in use at District 4 Surveying and Mapping. The certified legal descriptions for each parcel must be provided on paper and as an electronic word processing file compatible with WordPerfect 6.1. 1. COURT EXHIBIT PREPARATION: The CONSULTANT shall prepare court exhibits if directed by SLC. Court Exhibits and corresponding support services shall be negotiated as additional services. J. QUALITY CONTROL: The CONSULTANT shall provide the necessary quality control for each phase of the project. A quality assurance review must be performed by the CONSULTANT prior to any submittal. SLC will provide checklists for the CONSULTANT to use as part ofthis quality review, but the responsibility for quality lies with the CONSULTANT. Progress payments for the A-34 '-' .." surveying and mapping deliverables will be contingent upon the approval of SLC in coordination with the District Right of Way Surveyor. K. COMMUNICATIONS AND MEETINGS: THE CONSULTANT shall maintain open communications with St. Lucie County. If conflicts or uncertainties arise, the CONSULTANT shall schedule a meeting with SLC. L. SURVEYING AND MAPPING DELIVERABLES: Electronic field survey data shall be delivered to SLC on a segment by segment basis, along with a progress report for review. Non-electronic data (field books) will be delivered as the work is completed in the field. All field survey data will be checked and certified by the surveyor in responsible charge before it is submitted to SLC. The Original Mylar drawings of the Right of Way Control Survey must be approved and signed by the District Right of Way Surveyor. It will then be sent back to the CONSULT ANT for certification and record maintenance. The final Control Survey Drawing shall be submitted as a signed and sealed blueIine, certified by the CONSULT ANT'S Professional Land Surveyor in responsible charge of the field survey. The primary media for the submittal of Right of Way Maps and legal descriptions will be electronic. The files may be transmitted on either 3.5 inch diskette using the PKZIP utility as the compressing software or on compact diskette (CD's) and will be sent in Microstation DGN format. A half-size set of Right of Way Map prints and all supporting data should also accompany the submittal. SECTION V . ENVIRONMENT AL ANALYSIS AND REPORTS A. GENERAL: The CONSULTANT shall perform the services outlined in this section necessary to assess the environmental consequences or impacts of engineering alternatives that are being considered to satisfy the project's need. This effort consists of collecting essential data, analyzing and comparing viable alternatives, and documenting environmental impacts and recommendations. The A-35 ~ ...., CONSULTANT shall coordinate and perform the appropriate level of environmental analysis for this project as outlined in the PD&E Manual and the following sections. Immediately following the Advance Notification, the CONSULTANT shall begin preliminary assessments ofthe study corridor from an environmental standpoint. The data gathering consists of collecting various information and materials needed for the environmental analysis. The information should include all data necessary to perform adequate evaluation of the social, natural and physical impacts in determining the location and design of a transportation facility. Utilizing the data collected as part of this scope of work, the CONSULTANT shall perform the environmental analysis necessary to compare the impacts or environmental consequences of the proposed project alternatives. The environmental analysis will be performed concurrently with the development of project alternatives and the engineering analysis. B. ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL IMPACTS: 1. LAND USE INFORMATION: The CONSULTANT is responsible for the following: a. Collect data regarding past and present land usage as well as future land use plans, proposed developments, zoning guidelines, municipal comprehensive plans, and observed growth trends. b. Collect data required to prepare existing and future land use map(s) indicating as a minimum, residential, commercial, industrial, public, agricultural, and undeveloped areas adjacent to the alignment. c. Collect data on active development activity in the highway corridor, especially preliminary and filed plats which have the potential for dedication of highway right-of-way. The CONSULTANT must update information on any plat activity every three months. d. Determine if provisions of Coastal Barrier Resources Act apply and provide documentation as described in PD&E Manual Part 2 Chapter 26. A-36 ~ ..",.¡ 2. CULTURAL FEATURES: The CONSULTANT shall collect the data necessary to identify the Community Facilities listed in Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual, and also to identify any Section 4(f) lands (parks, recreation areas, wildlife refuges). The CONSULTANT shall develop a CADD data base that includes all existing cultural features. CADD data base information shall be compatible for use on aerial photography used for public hearing presentations, corridor maps, and alternative plans. 3. ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL-ECONOMIC IMPACTS: The CONSULTANT shall perform an analysis of the social-economic impacts of all proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 9, of the PD&E Manual. The CONSULTANT shall collect data regarding past and present land usage as well as future land use plans, proposed developments, zoning guidelines, municipal comprehensive plans, observed growth trends and their economic results. 4. RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION/RELOCATION DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT is responsible for the following: Data collection and preparation of the conceptual stage relocation plans. The CSRP shall be submitted to the FDOT Right of Way office for Quality Assurance. The CONSULTANT shall collect the data and perform the analysis necessary to complete a Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan for the proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 11, of the PD&E Manual. 5. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL FEATURES: The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to completely analyze the impacts to all cultural resources by all proposed alternatives and prepare a Cultural Resource Assessment Request Package as described in Part 2, Chapter 12, of the PD&E Manual. A-37 ~ "WÍ 6. DETERMINATION OF SECTION 4(F) INVOLVEMENT: The CONSULTANT shall determine if Section 4(f) applies to any properties affected by any proposed alternatives, and ifso, evaluate the impacts to the Section 4(f) property as described in Part 2, Chapter 13, ofthe PD&E Manual. 7. VISUAL AND AESTHETIC IMP ACT ANALYSIS: The CONSULT ANT shall analyze the visual and aesthetic impacts of all proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 15, of the PD&E Manual. 8. FARMLANDS IMPACT ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall determine if a farmland evaluation is required by any proposed alternatives after consulting with the District 4 specialist on procedural guidance associated with current directives as described in Part 2, Chapter 28, of the PD&E Manual. C. ANALYSIS OF NATURAL IMPACTS: 1. HYDROLOGIC AND NATURAL FEATURES: The CONSULTANT shall collect all the data necessary to perform an assessment of the impacts of the proposed alternatives in the following areas: - Wetlands (Part 2, Chapter 18 of the PD&E Manual). - Aquatic Preserves (Part 2, Chapter 19 ofthe PD&E Manual). - Water Quality (Part 2, Chapter 20 of the PD&E Manual). - Outstanding Florida Waters (Part 2, Chapter 21 of the PD&E Manual). - Wild & Scenic Rivers (Part 2, Chapter 23 of the PD&E Manual). - Floodplains and Floodways (part 2, Chapter 24 ofthe PD&E Manual). The CONSULTANT shall develop a CADD data base that includes all existing hydrologic and natural features. CADD data base information shall be compatible for use on aerial photography used for public hearing presentations, corridor maps, and alternative plans. A-38 \.or ..,J 2. IDENTIFY PERMIT CONDITIONS: In conjunction with the collection of data related to wetlands the CONSULTANT shall also obtain permit-related information about sites which may require dredge and fill permits, water quality permits, or stormwater discharge permits. This includes identifYing all involved permit agencies. 3. WETLAND IMPACT ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall analyze the impacts to wetlands for all proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 18, of the PD&E Manual. 4. CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION PLANS: The CONSULTANT shall prepare conceptual mitigation alternatives, if required, as described in Part 2, Chapter 18, of the PD&E Manual. The conceptual mitigation shall be documented as part of the Wetland Evaluation Report. 5. BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT DATA: The CONSULT ANT shall collect data necessary to perform a Biological Assessment for the proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 27, of the PD&E Manual. 6. WILDLIFE AND HABITAT IMPACT ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall analyze the impacts to wildlife and habitat by all proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 27, of the PD&E Manual. D. ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL IMP ACTS: 1. AIR QUALITY DATA COLLECTION AND IMPACT ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall collect the data necessary and perform the air quality impact analysis for the proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 16, of the PD&E Manual. 2. NOISE IMPACT DATA COLLECTION AND IMPACT ANALYSIS: the CONSULTANT shall collect the data necessary and perform the noise impact analysis for the proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 17, of the PD&E Manual. A-39 '-' ....I 3. CONTAMINATION IMPACT ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall perform the necessary analysis to complete the Contamination Screening Evaluation for all proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 22, of the PD&E Manual. 4. WATER QUALITY IMP ACT ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall analyze the impacts to water quality by all proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 20, ofthe PD&E Manual. 5. FLOODPLAIN IMPACT ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall analyze the significance of any encroachments to floodplains and floodways by all proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 24, of the PD&E Manual. 6. CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall analyze the construction impacts of all proposed alternatives as described in Part 2, Chapter 30, of the PD&E Manual. 7. COASTAL BARRIER IMPACT ANALYSIS: The CONSULTANT shall determine ifthe provisions of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act apply to any of the proposed alternatives a s described in Part 2, Chapter 26 of the PD&E Manual. E. ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS: The CONSULTANT shall document the results of the data collection efforts and the environmental analysis performed as part ofthis scope of work. The Environmental Documents prepared by the CONSULTANT will comply with all the procedures listed in the PD&E Manual, Part I, and will also follow the format and include all content described in Part 2 ofthe PD&E Manual. Especially important to the CONSULTANT'S work effort will be the "impact" sections of the Environmental Document which provide the scientific and analytic basis for the comparison of alternatives. The CONSULTANT shall provide all the necessary content for these sections as specifically listed in Part A-40 '-' ...., 2, Chapters 9 through 12 and Chapters 14 through 30 of the PD&E Manual. The task of documentation includes the preparation of draft and interim reports prepared by the CONSULTANT for review and comment upon by SLC prior to producing final reports and documents. The DEPARTMENT is responsible for final quality assurance and the administrative processing of all environmental documentation. All environmental documents must be submitted to FHW A and the Agencies by the DEPARTMENT. 1. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION: The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Advance Notification Package as described in Part I, Chapter 2, of the PD&E Manual for submittal by SLC through FDOT. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT An Environmental Assessment is the expected level of environmental documentation required for this project. The determination ofthe Class of Action is the responsibility of the DEPARTMENT in consultation with the FHWA Transportation Engineer. The CONSULTANT will do the work required for preparation ofthe Class of Action Determined form. The CONSULT ANT shall prepare an Environmental Assessment as described in Part 1, Chapter 4, of the PD&E Manual. After the Environmental Assessment is a accepted by SLC and the DEPARTMENT and approved by the FHW A, the CONSULT ANT will prepare a Notice of Availability. After a Public hearing is held, the CONSULTANT shall update the Environmental assessment and prepare a Finding of No Significant Impact as described in Part 1, Chapter 5 of the PD&E Manual. 3. OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS: The CONSULTANT shall provide the following separate reports as required by the PD&E Manual: - Air Quality Report (PD&E Manual, Part 2, Chapter 16). This is required only for projects that fail the screening test. - Noise Impact Report (PD&E Manual, Part 2, Chapter 17). - Wetland Evaluation Report (PD&E Manual, Part 2, Chapter 18). - Contamination Screening Evaluation Report (PD&E Manual, Part 2, Chapter 22). A-41 ~ ..J - Biological Assessment (PD&E Manual, Part 2, Chapter 27). - Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan (PD&E Manual, Part 2, Chapter 11) SECTION VI. STUDY REOUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS FOR WORK A. GOVERNING REGULATIONS: The services performed by the CONSULTANT shall be in compliance with all applicable FDOT Manuals and Guidelines. FDOT Manuals and Guidelines incorporate by requirement or reference all applicable State and Federal regulations. The current edition, including updates, of the following FDOT Manuals and Guidelines shall be used in the performance ofthis work. It is understood that AASHTO English criteria shall apply. All dimensions shall be shown in English units. 1. Project Development and Environment Guidelines. 2. Roadway Plans Preparation Manual(English, January 2000). 3. Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction, and Maintenance for Streets and Highways. 4. FDOT Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Handbook, Rev. Ed. 1998. 5. FDOT Right-of-Way Mapping Handbook. 6. FDOT Survey Manual. 7. FDOT Drainage Manual. 8. FDOT Soils & Foundations Manual. 9. FDOT Structures Design Guidelines. 10. FDOT Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) Roadway, Structures and Right-of Way Mapping Standards and Guidelines. A-42 '-" ..,J B. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Within ten (10) days after the Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT shall provide a schedule of calendar deadlines accompanied by an anticipated payout curve. Said schedule and anticipated payout curve shall be prepared in a format prescribed by SLC. C. KEY PERSONNEL: The CONSULTANT'S work shall be performed and directed by the key personnel identified in the proposal presentations by the CONSULTANT. Any changes in the indicated personnel shall be subject to review and approval by SLC. D. PROGRESS REPORTING: The CONSULT ANT shall meet with SLC on a monthly basis and provide written progress reports which describe the work performed on each task. Progress reports shall be delivered to SLC in a format as prescribed by SLC and no less than 10 days prior to submission of the corresponding invoice. Judgment on whether work of sufficient quality and quantity has been accomplished will be made by the Project Manager by comparing the reported percent complete against actual work accomplished. E. MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS: The CONSULTANT shall attend a Notice to Proceed Meeting with SLC representatives, where relevant project information will be provided by SLC, along with procedures for administering the contract. The CONSULTANT and his staff shall also be available with no more than a five (5) workday notice to attend meetings or make presentations at the request of SLC. Such meetings and presentations may be held at any hour between 8:00 A.M. and 12:00 midnight on any day of the week. The CONSULTANT may be called upon to provide maps, press releases, advertisements, audiovisual displays and similar material for such meetings. No more than 10 such meetings are anticipated. A-43 '" ""'" F. OUALITY CONTROL The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for insuring that all work products conform to FDOT standards and criteria. This shall be accomplished through an internal Quality Control (QC) process performed by the CONSULTANT. This QC process shall insure that quality is achieved through checking, reviewing, and surveillance of work activities by objective and qualified individuals who were not directly responsible for performing the initial work. Prior to submittal of the first invoice, the CONSULTANT shall submit to SLC's Project Manager for approval the proposed method or process of providing Quality Control for all work products. The Quality Control Plan shall identify the products to be reviewed, the personnel who perform the reviews, and the method of documentation. G. CORRESPONDENCE: Copies of all written correspondence between the CONSULTANT and any party pertaining specifically to this study shall be provided to SLC for their records within one (1) week ofthe receipt of said correspondence. H. LIAISON OFFICE: SLC will designate a Liaison Office and a Project Manager who shall be the representative of SLC for the Project. While it is expected the CONSULT ANT shall seek and receive advice from various State, regional, and local agencies, the final direction on all matters of this Project remain with the Project Manager. 1. OPTIONAL SERVICES: At SLC' s option, the CONSULTANT may be requested to provide final design and plans preparation services or expert witness services for right-of-way acquisition. The fee for these services shall be negotiated in accordance with the terms detailed in Exhibit B, Method of Compensation, for a fair, competitive and reasonable cost, considering the scope and complexity of the project(s). A supplemental agreement adding the additional services shall be executed in accordance with paragraph 2.00 of the Standard CONSULTANT Agreement. A-44 ~ ...".; Following is a list of key events and the associated total percentage of work considered to be complete at each event. This list will be used to control invoicing. Payments will not be made that exceed the percentage of work for any event until those events have actually occurred. A. SLC's acceptance of draft Preliminary Engineering Report and environmental reports and documents for comment. B. SLC's acceptance of Preliminary Engineering Report and environmental Reports and documents embodying all comments. C. Draft Environmental document approved D. Public hearing held. E. Preliminary Engineering Report completed. F. Final Environmental document approved by FHW A G. 30% Plans completed. H. 30% Right-of-Way maps completed. SECTION VIII. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY ST. LUCIE COUNTY SLC will provide those services and materials as set forth below: A. Project data currently on file. B. Engineering standards and review services. C. Environmental standards and review services. 45% 50% 55% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% D. All available information in the possession of SLC pertaining to utility companies whose facilities may be affected by the proposed construction. E. All future information which may come to SLC pertaining to subdivision plans so that the CONSULTANT may take advantage of additional areas that can be utilized as part of the existing right-of-way. F. All available information in the possession ofSLC pertaining to subdivision plans so that the CONSULTANT may take advantage of additional areas that can be utilized as part of the existing right-of-way. G. Process Advance Notification through FDOT. A-47 \.r' ."J H. Coordinate with the State Historic Preservation Officer. I. Process all environmental and engineering documents including Permit Coordination Package. J. 20 year Corridor Design traffic and turning movements with K30, D3o, and 24 hour T factors, including all associated modeling for corridor evaluation to produce necessary traffic volumes for CONSULTANT Level-of-service determination in support of Traffic Memo and Preliminary Engineering Report, in conjunction with the DEPARTMENT. K. Existing right-of-way maps. L. Required Hearing certification. M. All media costs for legal and display advertisements will be borne by the CONSULTANT. N. All postage expense for the public information workshop and Public Hearing notification mailings and newsletters will be borne by the CONSULTANT. O. SLC will provide available accident data. A-48 "'" ...", J. SUBMITTALS: The CONSULTANT shall provide copies ofthe required documents as listed below. These are the anticipated printing requirements for the project. This tabulation will be used for estimating purposes, and the Project Manager will determine the number of copies required prior to each submittal. Engineering Items: Copies: 5 10 10 10 10 15 10 10 10 5 Copies: 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 10 10 5 Corridor Report Draft Preliminary Engineering Report Traffic Report Preliminary Engineering Report (Signed and Sealed) Location Hydraulics Report Phase I Roadway Plan Set Right of Way Plans (each phase submittal) Geotechnical Report (Draft and Final) Value Engineering Information Report Drainage Report Environmental Items: Advance Notification Package Class of Action Determination Noise Study Report Air Quality Report Contamination Assessment Report Conceptual Stage Relocation Report Public Hearing Transcript Biological Assessment Wetlands Evaluation Report Draft Environmental Assessment Final Environmental Assessment Finding of No Significant Impact Cultural Resource Assessment Upon completion of the study, the CONSULTANT shaH deliver to SLC, in an organized manner, all project files, maps, sketches, worksheets, and other materials used or generated during the study process. A-45 - -- v ...., K. COMPUTER AUTOMATION: The project may be developed utilizing computer automation systems in order to facilitate the development and analysis of various project concepts and their impacts. Various software and operating systems were developed to aid in assuring quality and conformance with Department of Transportation policies and procedures. Seed Files, Cell Libraries, User Commands, MDL Applications and related programs developed for roadway design and drafting are available in Intergraph / Microstation format. However, it is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to utilize current FDOT releases of all CADD applications. The CONSULTANT's role and responsibilities are defined in FDOT's CADD ROADWAY STANDARDS MANUAL. The CONSULTANT may be required to submit documents and files which shall include complete CADD design & coordinate geometry files in Intergraph I Microstation format, as described in the above referenced document. The archived submittal shall also include either a TIMS database file, CADD Index file (generated from RDMENU) or documentation that shall contain the proj ect history, file descriptions of all (and only) project files, reference file cross references, and plotting criteria (e.g. batch, level symbology, view attributes, and display requirements). A printed directory of the archived submittal shall be included. Projects developed in English units must use the following working units: o master units of feet. o sub units of 100. o positional units of 10. The global origin will be in the lower left hand comer of the design plane. The working area is 4,294,967 feet square. This insures that: o all work is accurate to a hundredth of a foot with round off. o any of Florida's three State Plane Coordinate System English values can be stored in the CADD file. o EFB, CAiCE and GEOP AK. coordinate geometry files are compatible. SECTION VII. METHOD OF COMPENSATION Payment for the work accomplished will be in accordance with Exhibit B ofthis contract. Invoices shall be submitted in quintuplicate to SLC, in a format prescribed by the SLC. The SLC's Project Manager and the CONSULTANT shall monitor the cumulative invoiced billings to insure the reasonableness of the billings compared to the project schedule and the work accomplished and accepted by SLC. A-46 '-" 'WI AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C - 3b DATE: June 4,4002 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR [ l PUBLIC HEARING [ l CONSENT [xl PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 DBW SUBJECT: Approve Change Order NO.1 in the deductive amount of $(800.00); accept the project; release retainage in the amount of $24,875.00; and make Final Payment in the amount of $24,075.00 to Johnson-Davis for the Bluefield Road Culvert Replacement. BACKGROUND: On December 4, 2001, the Board awarded the contract to replace and upgrade the existing culverts beneath Bluefield Road. It was determined after the contract was awarded that exchanging the grated inlet drainage structures for the side drainage to mitered-end sections would improve ease of maintenance and result in a project cost decrease. The reduction is for that change. The work has been satisfactorily completed according to the contract documents. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Fund No. 101003-41131-563000-43028 (Transportation TrusU Local Option culvert Replacement). PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board awarded the construction contract on December 4,2001. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve and authorize the chairman to sign Change Order NO.1 in the amount of $(800.00), resulting in a total contract amount of $247,950.00; accept the project; and release retainage and make final payment to the contractor in the amount of $24,075.00. COMMISSION ACTION: --.~ K APPROVED [l OTHER [l DENIED CONCURRENCE: ( /?t..,~ Douglas Anderson ,lJPrcounty Administrator (,] M,CO B,d,~ :J¡ø ..,.A'rJ~ I'] P,""e". ~ [xl Dept. Rev. Coordinator ßfr'1 [x] Finance r '(¡.<JJ( ..~ [xl County Attorney Vi. [x] Project. Man. MVP (Check for copy only, if applicable) .~ '-' ...., DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 02 - 153 ·--·--------_·._.·..._...__..._0........._.__________..._______.___ -.-...--..-------.-................................------.-."-_..- -.-.....-.".-.-.-.".".".-.".-.".-.".-.-.-.".-."..."...._-...-...-...-...-...-..~...-...-...-...-...-...---.-.-.-.-.-.-.....-.".-.".. ··-·-··-------··-----·---·---------·....---..0..___..-_._.___...._. ...................".".-."."......."..,.."."..,...,...--_..._..-_._-_..-_..-~-.._._--._._._._._._._._..._......'.".".'...'.".".".".-. ......:.._.........:........................."."."..."...-...._-....."..,.."...".....--.."."."-".....".:."..............-.-...-...-.... TO: Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Don West, County Engineer~-vJ~ May 9,2002 SUBJECT: Bluefield Road Culvert Replacement :í;:ì'''Œ@ŒDW Œ r~ :.10, r.. .._._.u......'._--¡. I'\! II .( ! I: ¡. lru i.' MAY. I 0 2002 ¡O! ¡ ~ ¡ ... 1 ,_Ç~JN1ÝATTORN~ FROM: DATE: Attached are the releases of lien for the above referenced project. Please approve for correctness. If we can be of any assistance, please call Mike Powley, Capital Projects Engineer, at extension 1707. Barn fõ)mœmUWŒ.fñ1 lJ¡] MAY I 4 2002 æJ I ! _ ENGJNEFRI~<: I --_·-...._~,~,·_--...__._.h. Attachments (5) , 1 / /' 5/;/;0 J i;7 ðì)'( t' "'......... \$J/ I '-:'-,-- '-' . ~~ 15 U:í L'~ !i ':!/ !~ In., ~'-"___'¡I¡ ....J I i ~~:~~ ENGINEERING .- CHANGE ORDER ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROJECT: Bluefield Rd. Culvert Replacement (name, address) CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: No. 1 INITIATION DATE: 4/3/02 TO (Contractor): CONSULTANrs PROJECT NO.: N/A Johnson-Davis, Inc. 604 Hillbrath Dr. Lantana, FL 33462 ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: C01-12-205 CONTRACT DATE: 12/4101 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A - Yes) SEE ATTACHED The original (Contract Sum) was. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $248,750.00 Net change by previous authorized Change orders . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .. $-0- The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $248,750.00 The (Contract Sum) will be (decreased) by this Change Order ................................'..'''...........................'.... $(800.00) The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be .....,................................. $247,950.00 The Contract Time will be (unchanged) by . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (0 ) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is: 411102 Funds Available: Account Number: 101003-41131-563000-43028 The adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall comprise the total price andlor time adjustment due or owed the Contractor for the work or changes defined in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments include the costs and delays for all work contained in the Change Order, including costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non- affected work under this Contract. Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract price or time as a result of increases or decreases in costs and time of performance caused directly and indirectly from the Change Order, subject to the current scope of the entire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor that the Change Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed. All work performed under this Change Order shall be performed in accordance with the contract specifications, . 4/3/02 Date Approved: St. Lucie County Public Works Department St. Lucie County Department 2300 Vir inia Ave. Ft. Pierce Add s ¿. Ol.--- Johnson-Davis Contractor By: Date 604 Hillbrath Dr. Address Approved as to Form and Correctness County Attorney / ~ , '-" ..., 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., 6 Ó 0 ë'ã 0 0 õ <> '" r-- 0 æ N ~ ro I- '1 1ft I/) <It , - c: Q) 0 0 0 0 E .... ., 6 Ó ï: <> 0 l!l Q) æ '" OJ ro > ::;¡ N <It +" '1 0 0 I- '- 0- E - 1:: Q) ~ ~ U "'0 rn .:; fa l'II 0 0 a::: , In C C 0 o. "'0 rn ~ c Q) ..... .r: en '"= 0 (¡j '0 ¡¡:: -, c ll:: ro w Q) '0 ~ W 0 ~ ãi Cl -0 $ ll:: <1l ~ <1l 0 Ü 0 W ~ Ol 0 CL ~ N 1:) .8 N t z ..¡. l'II Q} 00 Q} « .b ü Ol 'OJ: c:.¡:::; 6 ttu 0 0-0 M 02« '<j':. ~ AGENDA REQUEST 'W' ITEM NO. C-4A DATE: June 4, 2002 REGULAR ( ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT (X ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT):Human Resources David Rodriguez Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Increase in premiums for Health Insurance. Allocation of funds to employees to cover increase. BACKGROUND: N/A FUNDS A V AILABLE: Health Insurance fund and various operating funds. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Health Insurance funding for 2003. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: - -; ~ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4~ A_ Douglas Anderson f7>lf County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Origmallng Depr. Other Other: Fmance (Check tor Copy only, if applicable): _ ) , . "". ..." INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA,. TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: David Rodriguez Human Resources Director DATE: June 4, 2002 SUBJECT: Health Insurance Increase BACKGROUND: As is the case with the rest of the nation, health insurance premiums are increasing dramatically. St. Lucie County is no exception. According to the recommendation of the County actuary, Wakely Consulting and Wayne Teegardin, Risk Manager, it will be necessary to increase premiums for the employer and the employee by 12%. See the attached chart for the increases for Option I, Option II and Option III effective Jan. 1,2003. Realizing the hardship this increase in the employee's share may create for many employees, the Board of County Commissioners will increase the employees salary for the coverage selected by the employee for calendar year 2003 over the cost of the premium paid by the employee for coverage during calendar year 2002 for the exact amount ofrb~crease in the premium (12%) for all non- . bargaining full time and part time with limited benefits employees. There will be general enrollment for all employees in September and October of 2002. This is the only time an employee may change their option on health insurance (except for special circumstances). If the employee wishes to change their coverage either up or down, the employee will only be reimbursed for the increase they pay on the premiums due, not the increase on the plan itself. Payroll deducts premiums for insurance one month in advance (deductions in December 2002 are for January 2003). Therefore the increase for employees will be effective Dec. 1,2002. RECOMMENDA nON: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the allocation of 12% reimbursement back to the non bargaining full time and part time with limited benefits employees for the health insurance premium increase. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ David Rodriguez Human Resources Director DR/mp Attachment Copies to: County Administrator Finance Director Employment and Labor Relations Manager Payroll Supervisor ; '-' ,,:.:~ \ " ~ -<:::....;."':;. OJ m m OJ m m OJ m m 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ Ql Ql Ql ..... ..... a. 0. ~ ~ 0. ~ ~ ~ ~ en (f) en ::r ::r CD ::r CD CD Dl CD CD Dl CD CD Ql CD CD ãl en + ..... (f) + ãl en 0 CD ::r :s::: ::r 0 ::r ::J Dl Ql Dl <' iÞ 0 ..... ::J ..... ..... CD CD tÞ CD ::T Ql ::J 0 ::J CD O'l ....,¡ O'l ....,¡ c.> c.> ~ lD lD lD ~ 0:> c.> c.> c.> O'l Õ· ....,¡ t1I N ....,¡ t1I N f'- ~ ~ ::J ¡", 0 ¡", 0 8 0 0 0 0 - t1I 0 t1I t1I t1I t1I 0 t1I "T1 .... -< ....,¡ ..... 0:> ....,¡ 0:> c.> ~ N 0 0:> 0 0:> N lD ..... ....,¡ c.> ..... ~ N ..... O'l ....,¡ ~ t1I lD f'- lD c.> . b Ï>.l :". ¡" :...,¡ r-., to ..... Ï>.l W c.> O'l 0 O'l 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ O'l ....,¡ c.> c.> ~ - ....,¡ 0:> 01 O'l 0:> ....,¡ N N ~ Õ· ..... t1I O'l c.> 0 ..... lD ~ ::J r-., 0 r-., ~ 0 ~ ¡", 0 01 = 01 0 t1I lD 0 lD c.> 0 c.> "T1 .... -< ....,¡ 0:> ....,¡ ....,¡ c.> c.> N 0 01 lD ~ 0 0:> lD O'l N lD ;¡e. N ..... t1I ....,¡ lD lD lD lD 0:> ....,¡ . Co Ï>.l 0 to ¡" en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ....,¡ 0 ....,¡ ....,¡ 0 ....,¡ c.> ~ O'l ....,¡ c.> c.> ::: t1I ....,¡ c.> O'l ....,¡ ....,¡ c.> N t1I 0 ....,¡ 01 N c.> 0 0 ~ 0 f'- ::J 0 0 0 ..... 0 ..... t1I 0 01 t1I 0 01 0:> 0 0:> c.> 0 c.> " .... -< ....,¡ 0:> ....,¡ ....,¡ c.> c.> N 0 c.> 0:> ..... 0 ....,¡ 0:> ....,¡ N lD t1I ~ lD ....,¡ 0:> O'l ~ N ....,¡ ~ N . . to 0 <0 ¡" :". 0 ¡" :". 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N ....,¡ 0 ....,¡ c.> ..." -:;¡~ ~g N" Ò:r Well --!!. - ::r ::I: m » ï -f ::I: - Z en c: ~ z (') m "0 ;::c o c... m (') -f m C - Z (') ;::c m » en m <I.,) c c <I.,) ~ C C W , AGENDA REQUEST ..." ITEM NO. C-4B DATE: June 4, 2002 REGULAR r ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Human Resources David Rodriguez Human Resources Director SUBJECT: October Increase BACKGROUND: The Board of County Commissioners approved the pay and classification pay plan on April 4, 2000, whereby it was approved to raise the ranges by the same amount of the increase. "0-'>- FUNDS A V AILABLE: 001-9910-599310-800 General Fund Salary Increase Reserves and various funds 9910-599310-800. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the 3% increase effective Sept. 29, 2002 for non-bargaining full time and part time with limited benefits employees. Subject to tentative and final approval of the budget. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: &d' APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ~~ ./1... Douglas Anderson /~'7í County Administrator Review and Aoorovals County Attorney: Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable): _ '-' ~ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: David Rodriguez Human Resources Director DATE: June 4,2002 SUBJECT: October Increase BACKGROUND: Staff recommends a 3% across the board increase for all non-bargaining full time and part time with limited benefits employees effective Sept. 29, 2002 for payroll purposes. If the employee is at the top of their pay range for his/her position, they will receive the full amount of the increase but the pay range for the position will not be affected as a result of the increase. As previously approved by the Board of County Commissioners as part of the pay and classification pay plan, the pay ranges will be increased by 3%J~!b.e bottom of the range and 3% to the top of the range effective Sept. 29, 2002. Employees who are in the initial probation period WILL NOT receive the 3% increase unless it is necessary to bring them up to the bottom of their range. Employees who are in a promotion probation will receive their 3% increase. Temporary employees WILL NOT receive the 3% increase unless it is necessary to bring them up to the bottom of their range. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a 3% across the board increase for all non-bargaining full time and part time with limited benefits employees effective Sept. 29, 2002 for payroll purposes. Subject to tentative and final approval of the budget. Respectfully submitted, ~~ David Rodriguez ~ Human Resources Director DR/mp Copies to: County Administrator Finance Director Employment and Labor Relations Manager Payroll Supervisor "'/ AGENDA REOUEST """" ITEM NO. C-4C REVISED DATE: June 4, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Human Resources David Rodriguez Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Resolution 02-139 - Amending Resolution No. 86-173 to incorporate the amendments to the Employee Handbook, entitled "3.08 Vacation Leave" and "3.09 Sick Leave", attached hereto and incorporated herein. This resolution shall be effective as of Oct. 1,2002 for all non-bargaining full time and part time with limited benefits employees. BACKGROUND: (See attached Resolution 02-139). FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/ A ~ RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed Resolution 02-139 as drafted amending sick leave and vacation leave including a shared sick leave policy. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: -.'1 ~ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ~~ Douglas Anderson ¡fIrrCounty Administrator Review and Aoorovals County Attorney: Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable): _ \.r '--" 'I RESOLUTION NO. 02-139 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 86.;173, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK FOR EMPLOYEES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. By Resolution No. 86-173, adopted September 16, 1986, and subsequently amended, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Employee Handbook for employees of St. Lucie County in order to update personnel policies to reflect changes in the federal and state law and provide each employee with essential information regarding personnel policies and benefits. 2. It is necessary to further amend ResolutioñN<r~173 to update Section 3 - 3.08 Vacation Leave (See attached hereto) 3. It is necessary to further amend Resolution No. 86-173 to update Section 3 - 3.09 Sick Leave (See attached hereto) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: 1. Resolution No. 86-173 is hereby amended to incorporate the amendments to the Employee Handbook, entitled "3.08 Vacation Leave" and "3.09 Sick Leave", attached hereto and incorporated herein. 2. This resolution shall be effective as of Oct. 1,2002 for all non- bargaining full time and part time with limited benefits employees. \ '-' ~ '\ After motion and second, the vote on this resolution and notice of election was as follows: Chairman Douglas Coward Vice Chairman Cliff Barnes Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula Lewis Commissioner John Bruhn PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: "'=-- - By: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Assistant County Attorney \ \w .." SUMMARY Vacation Leave Old Policy New Policy 1- 5 years - 10 days 6- 10 years - 12 days 11-15 years - 15 days 16-20 years - 17 days 20 years or more - 20 days 1- 5 years - 1 0 days 6- 10 years - 15 days 11- 20 years - 20 days 21- 25 years - 1 additional day per year for a maximum of 25 days Sick Leave ~ Old Policy New Policy Only 5 days a year could be used for illness of a member of the immediate family Sick leave (if available) may be used to care for an immediate family member as approved by the County Administrator or designee New policy of Shared Sick Leave '- ...; 3.07 HOLIDAYS 'I The following days normally will be observed as paid holidays: New Year's Day (January 1st) Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday (3rd Monday in January) Memorial Day (Last Monday in May) Independence Day (July 4th) Labor Day (1 st Monday in September) Veterans Day (November 11th) Thanksgiving Day (4th Thursday in November) Friday after Thanksgiving Christmas Eve (December 24th) Christmas Day (December 25th) In the event a holiday falls on a Saturday, the Friday before will be observed. If the holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday will be observed. . 'I ." When a holiday is observed on a day on which an employee is normally scheduled to work, the employee will receive holiday pay for the number of hours for which the employee normally would have been scheduled. For example, if the employee normally works a ten (10) hour day, the employee will receive ten (10) hours of pay for the holiday; if the employee normally works an eight (8) hour day, the employee will receive eight (8) hours of pay for the holiday. If the holiday is observed on a day on which the employee is not scheduled to ~, the employee's holiday will be granted on the first day he/she woulèrTfUllllally be scheduled to work following the date the holiday is observed as indicated above. For example, if an employee normally works a four (4) day week, such as ten (10) hours a day, Wednesday through Saturday, and a holiday is observed on a Monday, the employee will receive Wednesday off with ten (10) hours pay. If the employee's Department Director determines, however, that the needs of the department will not permit the employee to have a day off on that day, the employee will work that day at his/her regular rate of pay and also receive holiday pay equal to his/her normally scheduled hours at regular rate of pay. All non-exempt employees who work on a holiday will be paid at a rate of one and a half (1 1/2) times their regular hourly pay. Holidays are not considered as time worked for payroll purposes of determining whether overtime is due. Unless an employee has received prior written approval to be off on a scheduled work day preceding and/or following a holiday, the employee must work the scheduled work day(s) in order to receive holiday pay. 3.08 VACATION LEAVE \lacatiQR 18a'.'Q fgr:all fyll tiR=l8 QR=I~lg)'ggi> '''it ;:¡ 18ii tl:tiR fl"9 (5) ysart QSRtiRYQIoI€ g8p:igQ ~a serRes SA 81'1 R81:lFly Basia aAè is e8FFl :ll:lteå at tRa rata afteR (10) e1aye :ler j·ear. '\'eclStioP'llea:re fer all ft:J1I time effl 9laye:ee wit" fWe (6) ar ffiere yesl'9 af e8P'1tifll:lal:l5 e.el"t'iee -~. -~ JRd 19i~ t ;:¡iR tlilr::1 (10) ysart gf 6:8Rtil11018l.1i i'i,,'i~'i ii 'i~R=lgd QR .R hQI.IRy Þa~Îf: eRd is 'QQR=I(awtSg :at the rate 8fw.'slve '(12)E1a~'6 (asr ~'SaF. Rev. 12.98 SECTION 3 - PAC;E 5 \., ~ . VQQstion e:iVe for Oill f1.¡1I tir;:¡s sr;:¡pleY'ls¡; \':itR tSR (1 Q) fQr FRer" Y~OiFi sf Eì9AäRl:lSl:lS sefYi~ ~nrl_ I".~~ thar:¡ fifteen (15) Y":il1"i of CQntimdQl.li ~"rviCli ¡E samsEl SA aA RStJFly Basis 81"1ð i! .c'omp' ¡tlid at the r:ilt" Qf íiít"lin (1 fi} E1ays ~er yesr:.! , . , . ~ \/:íiI~íltiçm I~i>./~ fQr .11 fyll tir;:¡9 sFRpleyees ',vittI tift'een (1 ã) er r;:¡eFEI years sf eeAtifll:l~tJS J $eI"4c~ and leii th.n PcVQrlty ~Q) y":3Fi sf œntiFll::lElblS sElFViee is t;laFF;lea S,A SR A81::lFly P3asis and ¡Ii ~QFRpl.lt,," .t the r41t9 sf Ee'/8nteeFl (17) 8QYS ~ery9;¡¡r. .. ." " p\/::ll"::ltinn l~a'/~ for all f'.I11 tir:¡:¡~ "mpIQy&eli "'itt;:, Þ'/8nty (~g) er FflSFe yesrs ef eSRtiFl1::lS\::lS . '.. tSP/ie8 is eaFAeEl eA aA !::¡el::lrly Basis SRa is eSFfl :lldtea at tAe FElts eft.\'sl'lty (2Ð) Elays J!'sr year. VQootisn lea\'e will Be Basså en an eigl1t (8) Aeldr'/Jerle ~erieè, tV~~tinn I"'~\I'" m::lY bE? I ,,,,od íl.. it ili e:íilm"d After ;QmpletieR sf she (8) FflSRtAe sf seNiee - nr may be u$'id within þ'IQRÞJ fQur (~<t) r;:¡eFltAs f¡:sr;:¡ Elate eBfReel, .Vty '¡aeetisflleev8 l"Ist 1.1£8" withiFl p.'/8nty fQl.lr (~<t) FReRtI'u: fl;eFR Elate eaFA8d will tie eeAsieeree ferfeiteEf aREI lest, e)(Se~twAeR aR eFA~lej'ee ASS BesR elsRiea l:lSS efls8'/e eseatJse atlAs Reeele ef1he f f".nllnty In thn~e C'a'j~'t. tP° COlln~ .ðÇ miRilitr.tor or ~ii ""Ii¡gRee FRay 8xteRe tJ::Ie peFiee ; EluJlÏflg 'NRieJo¡ the lee'. 8 ffl~ Be I:ls.eeJ. . employ ~~3 ...he 198"'8 eeffl 9leteEl ei)( (8) FflefltRs er FRQrG ¡el\'i~e it;:,:íilII, Yr;'C'''' 19"'\li "lg th". ..cn""1¥ in good ¡tanding, be r;'íii" fQr :iI~a:l.l&d "íi~tiQr:l18:3'.'e. ,I;.,p.y aSQ, FRl::llatee vasatisR ..leave will BO J!'aiel iR tAe last regular eAeele Bft effl 9lsyee reeei..ee, :lfeviEfea tAe FiRsFI8e -- Oep.rtm"nt ii infQ l:R"" of the '~~inQtieR iA tiFA8 t9 iASIl::lEfe it SF! tAs laet fe§l:llar eAsel< __ .nd the t8r:min4tien is net fsr FRiGSlíiInEl.,¡et. If tJ::Ie FiAGnEiEl De~aÅFFleAt Eleea flst FeElei'¡e tRe informðtien in time 81"1d the termin.!ltion Î3 l"Iot fer misGol"ldtlet, p.!l) ment for .!Ieet::Jml::JIfltEld ".~.tign le:;¡¡ve will tie FRaga at the sAe sf the Re)Et ~ay "ariseI. "aestisRles'/s vAil Rat Be .added to thA I~!':t rl~y wnrlt-ød to det<¡rmine tt;:,e tem:tiAatisR elate. , . 'In th9 <¡\lent in eFRployee "¡¡liheE te tal~e FREIre tt:'lBA Aie.'her B88FtJeel vaeatieRleal/e, BRei , fl... ¡¡xhal.lited ill i".i1.ble ":íiI~.tiQn tim", t :¡e eFRpllíilyee FRGy er FRay net, at tRe E1i£sFetien Qf the O~p.rtFRent Oirector Iíilr Civiiier:! Manager ee gFaAteel SJEtFa lea"e vJitAel::lt ~BY. Vasatien leave sRallee .,¡ssel fer siell lesve iR tAc aI/OAt aeeufflt:llateef sisle Isave is Ret $1 ¡#jcient to ~Q1J8r engt/1 sf iIIRsse sr iRj..Fy. Vdl....dliUII d~~;~llIllt:;lll~ "ill bð II u!dð il"l ðccord81 to! .,with thð prcfe:~Rec sf cfAf9leyee if GlAQ J when, in the epinien sf tn8 ilrlfiil&rviliSI) i& :"ice r:equir&FRent£ "(i11 p¡¡r::r.tIit. " V~~~tiðn p::lY will hA ::.t th,:¡ ;'::Ici,.. nnllrly r::Jta nT r~Y nf ~h~ emp'oyoe. I' \w ...." . 3.08 VACATION LEAVE '1 , Vacation time off with pay is available to eligible employees to provide .£E,portunities for rest, relaxation and personal pursuits. Employees in the following employment classification(s) are eligible to earn and use vacation time ps described in this pol~ · Regular full-time employees · ~ Regular part-time employees with limited benefits The amount of paid vacation time employees receive each year increases with the length of their emplovment as shown in ~owini sched,JJle' · Upon initial eligibility the employee is entitled to 10 vacation days each year, (two weeks) accrued biweekly at the rate of 3.08. Limited vacation hours 160 (cap). Based on 80 hours. I · · 11 years to 20 years of eligible service, the em 10 ee is entitled t _vacation ays eac year (4 weeks ), accrued biweekly at the rate ot. 6.16. Limited vacation hours 320 (cap). Based on 80 hours. · 21 years to 25 years of eligible service, the employee is entitled to 1 additional day per year for a maximum of 5 weeks as follows: 21 years of eligible service, the employee is entitled to 21 vacation days each year, accrued biweekly at the rate of 6.46. Limited vacation hours 335 (cap). Based on 80 hours. 22 years of eligible service, the employee is entitled to 22 vacation days each year, accrued biweekly at the rate of 6.78. Limited vacation hours 352 (cap). Based on 80 hours. >I 23 years of eligible service, the employee is entitled to 23 yacation days each year, accrued biweekly at the rate of7.08. Limited vacation hours 368 (cap). Based on 80 hours. '-' """" 24 years of eligible service. the ell\Ployee is entit~ to 24 vacation days each year, accrued biweekly at the rate of7.40. ".. Limited vacation hours 384 (cap). Based on 80 hours. 25 years of service, the employee is entitled to 25 vacation days ~ each year (5 weeks), accrued biweekly at the rate of7.70. Limited vacation hours 400 ( cap). Based on 80 hours. Any vacation leave not used within twenty four (24) months from date earned will þe considered forfeited and lost, except when an em 10 ee has been denied use of eave ecause of the needs of the County. In those cases, the County Administrator or his designee may extend the period during which the leave may be used. .Employees who have completed six (6) months or more service shall. upon leaving the County in good standing, be paid for accrued vacation leave. Any accumulated vacation leave will be paid in the last regular check an employee receives, providëãTh.e Finance Department is informed of the termination in time to include it on tfiëlast regufãfëlieëKãiid1he termination is not for misconduct. If the Finance Department does not receive the information in time and the termmßllon IS not tor mIsconduct, payment fÇl!;!ls,cumulated vacation leave will be . .made at the end of the next pay period. Vacation leave will not be added to the last , day work to determine the termination date. . . The length of eligible service is calculated on the basis of a "calendar ear." This )s e -mont peno at egins when the employee starts to earn vacation time. Military leave has no effect on this calculation. (See individualleRve of Rh~en~e policies for more information.) Once employees enter an eligible employment classification, they begin to earn paid vacation time according to the schedule. However, before vacation time can be used, a waiting period of six months must be completed. After that time. employees can request use of earned vacation time includin that accrued durin e waItmg peno . ,Paid vacation time can be used in minimum increments of .25. To take vacation, ~employees should request advance approval from their supervisors. Requests will be reviewed based on a number of factors, including business needs and staffing requirements. ,; '-' ., Vacation time off is paid at the employee's base pay rate at the time of vacation. , , In the event an employee wishes to take more than his or her creditable vacation leave, the employee mayor may not, at the discretion of the County Administrator . or his designee, be granted extra leave without pay. Leave without pay will not be granted if vacation time is available. N acation leave may be used for sick leave in the event accumulated sick leave is not sufficient to cover length of illness or injury. ~For payroll purposes, vacation leave will not be considered as time worked. As stated above, employees are encouraged to use available paid vacation time for rest, relaxation, and personal pursuits. In the event that available vacation is not used by the end of the benefit year, employees may carry unused time forward to -:the next benefit year. If the total amount of unused vacation time reaches a "cap", further vacation accrual will stop. When the employee uses paid vacation time and brings the available amount below the "cap", vacation accrual will bep;in again. ,,:.;~ '- ..., " ". , Employees who have completed six (6) months or more service shall, upon leaving' the County In good standing, be paid for accrued vacation leave. Anyaccumulateâ vacation leave will be paid In the last regular check an employee receives, provided the Finance Department is informed of the termination In time to Include It on the last regular check and the termination Is not for misconduct. If the Finance . Department does not receive the Information In time and the termination Is not for misconduct, payment for accumulated vacation leave will be made at the end of the next pay period. Vacation leave will not be added to the last day worked to determine the termination date. In the event an employee wishes to take more than hislher accrued vacation leave. and has exhausted all available vacation time, the employee mayor may not, at the discretion of the Department Director or Division Manager be granted extra leave without pay. Vacation leave shall be used for sick leave in the event accumulated sick leave Is not sufficient to cover length of illness or injury. Vacation assignments will be made in accordance with the preference of employee if and when, in the opinion of the supervisor, service requirements will permit. Vacation pay will be at the basic hourly rate of pay of the employee. ~ ~ SICK LEAVE Sick leave with pay shall be accrued at a rate of one (1) working day for each month of service. There is no maximum on the amount of sick leave an employee may accumulate. Sick leave will be used based upon fifteen (15)minute intervals for all non-exempt employees. Exempt employees will use sick leave in eight (8) hour intervals. In case of illness within the immediate family (refer to Section 3.15 for a list of immediate family) up to five (5) 3iGk days (if S'tailable) æ leave Of available) may be taken annually to care for an immediate family member as approved by b County Administrator or desianee. This time will be deducted from your sick leave balance. This restriction does not apply to leave taken under the Family Medical Leave Act. Sick leave is a privilege which shall be allowed only in cases of personal sickness, injury, or disability, including pregnancy, scheduled doctor or dentist appointments, or legal quarantine because of exposure to a contagious disease QLfor members o( your immediate family. In order to be granted sick leave with pay, an employee must notify hislher immediate supervisor no later than thirty (30) minutes after the beginning of the . scheduled wo~k day of the reason for his/her absence, unless the employee Is '-' ..." unable through no fault of his/ her own, to give such notice. NOTE: Please check for your individual department's rules regarding call-in time. In the event that an employee is absent for three (3) or more consecutive working days, he/she may be asked to submit a medical certificate signed by a physician stating the kind and nature of his/her sickness or injury. Employees who are excessively absent or who have a pattern of absences, will be asked to provide a medical certificate. Any employee who uses sick leave when physically fit may be discharged. When accumulated sick leave is not sufficient to cover an illness or injury, the employee shall use his/her vacation leave to help cover time needed for illness or injury. In the event no sick or vacation leave is available and the employee does not qualify for any other type of leave, the employee will not be paid for the absence. All County employees shall be entitled to terminal "incentive pay" for accumulated and unused sick leave to be paid to each employee upon normal or regular retirement, or termination, or resignation, other than for misconduct, after ten (10) years of creditable and continuous service with St. Lucie County, and to the beneficiary if service is terminated by death, after ten (10) years of creditable and continuous service. The payment shall be determined by using the rate of pay (eêéïved by the employee at the time of retir6i7iOOt, termination, resignation, or . death. Terminal pay allowable for unused sick leave shall not exceed a maximum of sixty (60) days. This payment shall not be considered in any state retirement system as salary payments, and shall not be used in determining the average final compensation of an employee on any state administered retirement system. For payroll purposes, sick leave will not be considered as time worked. Pursuant to Section 1-2-16, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinance and Compiled Laws, any employee found guilty in a court of competent jurisdiction of committing, aiding, or abetting an embezzlement or theft from his/her employer, or of bribery in connection with employment, committed prior to retirement or ten (10) years normal creditable termination, whose employment is terminated by reason of his/her admitted committing, aiding, or abetting of an embezzlement or theft from his/her employer or by reason of bribery or for cause, or who prior to a ten (10) years normal creditable termination or retirement, is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to have violated any state law against strikes by public employees shall forfeit all rights and benefits under this section. An employee who is terminated as a result of a violation of this section or for cause will not be given credit for unused sick leave accumulated prior to termination should the employee be re-employed at a later date. '- ...,¡ SHARED SICK LEAVE A. This is a voluntary program to provide income for those County employees who have extended medical problems. but are not eligible for disability. workers comoensation or retirement benefits. County employees must have successfully comoleted their initial evaluation period to be eligible to receive donated sick leave. Eligibility to receive program benefits is contingent upon the exhaustion of all individually accrued sick leave and vacation leave. B. The employee or someone on his behalf may reauest sick leave benefits from this program which will be substantiated by a verified physician's certification which shall include a cause of the illness or injury certifying the existence of the illness which prevents the employee from performing assigned duties and stating the anticipated duration of the illness. Department Directors may recommend an employee to receive such donated sick leave subiect to the approval of the County Administrator or designee. The County Administrator or designee may reauest a certification from a second physician at any time and at the emoloyee's exoense. Written Certification from any physician may b~ reauired every thirty (30) calendar days or less often. C. An employee may donate sick leave hours to the orogram at any time and must soecify the employee to be the recipient of the donation. Sick leave contributions to the orogram are irrevocable and cannot be returned to the donating èñTployee. The donatinqamployee must have over fourteen (14) days - of sick leave accumulated and maintain fourteen (14) sick leave days after the. donation of sick leave. Any donated sick time will be deducted from the. employees sick leave accumulation in increments of eight (8) hours or ten (10) hours and will not be reflected as time used by the emoloyee. D. The maximum number of work days if available in the shared sick leave program which can be used by an employee during his employment is 240 days. An employee is limited to 120 work: days (if available) for one period of absence from work during a twelve (12) month period. An employee will not be eligible for donated sick leave while receiving disability. retirement or Social Security. .E" The following are exclusions. limitations and termination of benefits: A. Any occupationally related accident or illness for which workers compensation benefits are oayable. B. Horseplay or intoxication by alcohol or drugs while at work. or a failure to obey instructions or use a safety device while at work. C. Intentionally self-inflicted iniuries. \w, ~ D. Injury occl!rring in the còurse of committing a felony or assault. ') E. Active duty in the armed forces. E. War. insurrection. rebellion. or active and iIIeqal carticication in a riot. G. Cosmetic suraery or treatment deemed medically unnecessary by a chvsician. !:::l Confinement to a oenal or correctional institution as a result of conviction for a criminal or other oublic offense. A oarticioatina emolovee will immediatelv lose the right to use Shared Sick Leave Program benefits because of the followina: 1. Termination of emolovment. J." Durina a susoension without oav. K. Failure to provide the reauired ohvsician certification and any abuse or misuse of the Sick Leave policy for which the emclovee has been disciplined within twelve (12) months of the commencement of the disability. exhaustion of maximlfffl"'Shared Sick Leave Program days: fraud or mi~cresentation in reauesting or use of the Shared Sick Leave Proqram benefits. An employee who was usina donated sick leave will not be oaid for any unused donated sick leave upon retirement. If a designated critically ill or disabled emoloyee does not use all of the donated sick leave. the donors cannot recover their sick leave donation. Normal sick leave and vacation leave will not accrue while an emplovee is using paid donated sick leave. .. .,.. " AGENDA REQUEST ITEM~ c.S DATE:June 4, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBUC HEARING CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMIITED BY(DEPTj: County Attornev Daniel Mcintyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Se Lucie Oaks Right-of-way Donation Warranty Deed-Resolution 02-137 24 feet of road right-of-way on U.S. 1 BACKGROUND: Attached for your review, consideration and approval is a copy of a Warranty Deed for 24 feet of road right-of-way for future widcning of U.S. I. The right-of-way donation is in compliance with Resolution 93- 184 (see attached). The County will then tranfer the right- of-way to FOOl'. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Resolution 93-184 granted Final Development Plan approval for St. Lucie Oaks subject to tlle developer conveying to St. Lucie County 24 feet of right-of-way. Resolution 95-147 granted a Final Extension for approval of Sl. Lucie Oaks. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the Warranty Deed, authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution 02-137 and direct staff to record the \;v'arranty Deed and Resolution 02-137 in the Public Rccords ofSt. Lucie County, Florida. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: <'A~ ;0-- ~ IX APPROVED [J DENIED [ ] OTHER: .",-..-D0uglas M. Anderson F-jJll County Administrator [Xl County Attorney: 7 Review and Approvals [ lOriginating Dept, [x] Road and Bridge:~ [X] Engineering:~F~' if applicable) ( ) Utilities: [xl Public Works: 7U<-J [] Finance , (check for copy only, G:\ACQ\WP\Janet\Donation\St. Lucie Oaks Agenda.wpd ·'. . . . .. ..... :- :- : '-' :- :- :- :- :::::> .':-:-:'::: 0 I MILES I 1'2 i 0 880 1320 1980 28.0 OF ~..c ~ ."", .. 1It_ ~ U.."'5 ',IIt_' ~ so(tCtll1 I ~ ;--; I FEE'" 8280 TWP. 3ES.-RNG. .OE: ST. LUCIE GARDENS l!1 .. ci = If .,; co .. 0: ;¡: ... N co .. w " .. .. w w .. : TWP. 37S.-RNG 40E. Œ~ ''':¡, f~OfllO'" P,"T'S S£E P.OE 69 '-' """" .~ \ ~ ) 1:11- f ~ E ~ 8~ I/) V"l .iJ..1f\ ~ ~ o v .U ~' <t: 'g -u ~~ -4- úl: \ .:J~ w .. ~t;: ~ ~ ~ o .' 6"- o ~ ~ "B f n · l1.; ì5' ~ 9 ~ 5:~ .., - ¡:¡z .¡ ..J t « :z o - t: ~ IlJ 2 :; i g o 5 p w .~ If¡ o o b! o \l.I ,k~ 0( :J G !J.E. c.O t,I-ll:.~ Of,l-lt I-U.I/4- OF THe N.W,I/4-0f SECT\O!J I 'Z:2., T 3(q $, R 4-0 E., ST.luc.l~ COUNr'(\ ROItIOA A¡.te> porN.,. OF (OMMUlCEMé.J-.lr oc-I . o :;z >- ,.rj 3 s~ O'ì .- :r: . (1)' . :J $CAL~: I"~ 4-01 NOíË.: nlls \5 !Jor A SUR,VE'í. F.l,"Hí~OF·WA,( 5k.~tch to ac.c.olrtpany d~sc.r'lptlon Co C¡\lVUT M{;NT(j()MOlY cf ASS(lCIATU, INC. Add'ltionat Rìght¥of-wôy for' U.s, Hi9nwðy F"... ".... ~,_ 1 ..J. c-r \ It""!:. ^^I/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ri6 47 ~8 ~9 50 '-' ~ 12. The propo:õed project will not have an undue effect on adjacent property, the character neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, facilities, or other matters affecting the public safety and general welfare. adverse of . the utility health, 13. All reasonable steps have been' taken adverse effect of the proposed project vicinity through building design, landscaping and screening. to minimize any on the immediate site design, 14. The proposed project will.be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 15. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. 16. The applicant has demonstrated that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. 17. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Administrator on September 15, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project known as st. Lucie Oaks - A Planned Unit Development and a Planned Non-Residential Development, be approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by C. Calvert Montgomery and Associates, Inc., dated April 23, 1993, - and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Administrator on August 25, 1993, subject to the following conditions: . . . . ........... -:-:-:.:-:-:-:-:. . 1. NO construction permit for any portion of the st. Lucie Oaks proj ect shall be issued until the easterD..lllost twenty-four feet of the property has been dedicated to st. Lucie County for future US 1 expansion. ::~:::::::::: :.... . ......... : · . . . . . 0·' . . . . . . . .'. . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 2. Revisions which are intenåed to save additional onsite trees shall be approved at the staff level. 3 o :0 (n o o :>;. o CD 01 If:> "0 ;too G1 trl t\l o If:> o '-r .J This document has been prepared by and is to be returned to; ROBERT A. BURSON, P.A. By: Robert A. Burson, Esquire Florida Bar# 217638 Mailing Address: Post Office Box 1620 Stuart, Florida 34995-1620 Street Address: 310 West First Street Stuart, Florida 34994 (561) 286-1616 RAB File Number: 02-078 WARRANTY DEED (Statutory Form-Section 689.02 F.S.) THIS INDENTURE, made this on the date set forth below, BETWEEN: ST. LUCIE OAKS, L.C., a Florida limited liability company, whose post office address is 2161 SE Ocean Boulevard, Stuart, Florida 34996, herein referred to as "grantor", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose post office address is 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, herein referred to as "grantee", with "grantor" and "grantee" being used herein for singular or plural, as the context requires. WITNESSETH, That grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars, and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, all of grantors interest in and to the following described land, situate, lying and being in St. Lucie County, Florida, to-wit: PARCEL 5: (US Hiohwav 1 additional rioht of way) That part of the Northeast 14 of the Northwest 14 of Section 22, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, to be used for right-of _ way purposes and described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of the Northeast 14 of the Page 1 of 3 ~ '-' """ Northwest ~ of said Section 22 and run North 8ge 53' 00" West along the North line of said Section 22 for 42.00 feet to a point on the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No.1, said point being the Point of Beginning for the following described parcel: thence continue North 8ge 53' 00" West along said North Section line for 24.00 feet; thence run South DOc 07' 00" West along a line which is parallel to the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No.1 for 174.11 feet; thence run South 8ge 49' 55" East for 24.00 feet to a point on the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No.1; thence North DOC 07' 00" East along said West right-of-way line for 174.13 feet to the Point of Beginning. This parcel contains 4179 square feet, more or less. Note as to Parcel 5: For purposes of this description, the bearing of the North line of Section 22-36-40 is assumed to be North 8ge 53' 00" West and all bearings shown hereon refer thereto. PARCEL 1.0. NO. A portion of 3422 211 0001 000/0 and grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. SUBJECT TO conditions, restrictions, reservations, limitations and easements of record; zoning and other regulatory ordinances; and taxes for the year 2002 and subsequent years. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal on the date set forth below. Page 2 of 3 Ø1 '-' ...., ST. LUCIE OAKS. L.C., a Florida limited liability company ~ ;;::es, its member manager May _, 2002 Signed. sealed and delivered by Richard Gomes, as the member manager of St. Lucie Oaks, L.C.. a Florida limited liability company in the presence of the following witnesses: S;gnature of 1 st w;tness: ~'--:::>~?ß~-=> . (....---'" Printed name of 1 st witness: IO.i........'1'" K. 'yJ"'A(L.",-c~ -¡Jdq- ~;(kr-- Signature of 2nd witness: Printed name of 2nd witness: ROBERT A. BURSON STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MARTIN Subscribed and acknowledged before me on May ~, 2002, by Richard Gomes as member manager of St. Lucie Oaks, L.C., a Florida limited liability company, and he is personally known to me. ,-$.;;r.;:r\,> ROBERT A BURSON 4/ / /} ~. /A _ g. !'~ MYCOMMISSION#CC985179 7l~ c...,.;;;7 J?1r--- ff:~' EXPIRES: January 31 2005 "" 6ondedThruNo"ryPublicU~"",",.~ (Signature of Notary Public) (Notary Seal) ROBERT A. BURSON (Print. type. or stamp commissioned name of Notary Public) F:\E\REAL-EST\ST-LUCIE\02-078\DEED T.O SL COUNTY-01 Page 3 of 3 ø '-' .""""" RESOLUTION NO. 02,137 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A WARRANTY DEED ON BEHALF OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St Lucie County, Florida, that: TIle foregoing \Varranty Deed is duly accepted on behalf of St. Lucie County this 4 day of June, 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN ArrEST: Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: By: COUNTY KITORNEY G:\ACQ\ WP\,IlLuct\Douation\St. Luclc Oaks Resolutiou.doc .'§\ ~ ) ~- é ~ E ~ ðrr: ~ V'\ .il.V\ ~ l:J o V ,c..J ~;< 'g -0 ~ s:: ~ -1- U} \ '- 'wII ~.E. C.OIl.}.J'2.F.. OF THE. .. .~.I¡4- OF ThE. N.W.1/4 Of 5E.CT10¡"¡ 'Z.1.., T 3~ $. R 4-0 E.. 51'. Luc.l~ COUI-rr'(. ROltfÒA A1-lD I'OINí OF COMME.IJCE.,^éNT ..:JA \J.l "'1 ~t: j ~ ~ ~ ·0 .' 6" o ~ ~ ~b -? n . ~ ~ ~ '2 ~ e:-...;¡ ...... - ~ ~ .¡. ..J ~ ~ !: « !: ;:¡ :z ~ 9 ~ ~ \L 0' .0 ~~ ~~ i C \Þ i I 9 ;¿ I l"'" ~ ,'Z.~;oo 0 íI\lU O· 5. e.o;°4~·s~"e·. R 3 2 I Ul 2 ~ '3 2 ~ 0 õ 5 SJ UJ l" V) o o b! o UJ ....; ~ < :J ¡j ~ . o :::z >- ,1j 3 s: Oï .- :r: . (.f) . .::J $CAL~: 11f:. 4-01 NOri:.: THIS IS lJar A SU~VE:t P-IGrHí· OF' WA'í Sk.a.tc.h. to acc.o\rtpany d~scr"p"\OI1 Co CALVUIT MO'H(;CMUY ~ ASSCCIATU, .NC. Add'ltiona.l_ ~ìiht~of~wôY for US. Hì9hwôy '- ...., .I>' - , . DESCRIPTION FOR ADDITIONAL RIGHT-Of-WAY FOR U.S. HIGmqAY NO.1 AT ST. LUCIE OAKS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA That part of the Northeast one-quartêr öf the Northwest one- quarter of Section 22, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, st.. Lucie County, Florida, to be used for right-of-way purposes and described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of the Northeast one-quarter of the Northwest one-quarter of said Section 22 and run North 89°53'00" West along the North line of said Section 22 for 42.00 feet'to a point on the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 1, said point being the Point of Beginning for the following describe.d parcel: " . . Thence continue North 89°53' 0011 West along said North Section line for 24.00 feet; Thence run South 0°07' 00" West along a line which is parallel to the West right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No.1 for 174.11 feet; Thence run South 89°49'55" East for 24.00 feet to a point on the West right-of-way line of cr.S. Highway No. 1; Thence North. 0007! 0011 East along said West right-of-way line for 174.13 feet to the Point of Bèg-inning. I'L- This parcel contains 4179 square feet, ~ore ~ l~ss. This description and the attached sketch were prepared by Arthur Speedy, P.L.S., for C. Calvert Montgomery & Associates, Inc. -.-.._-..~...- C. (I\tVUlT MCNT(ì()MUY ci AU(){'ATU. INC. En II I ne~r' D~5cr'lption for Addiiionð! Right~of-w~y for U,S. ~·IShw2.Y No. r ~..r 51: LUCIE. dAK:.,) \..-- -....,. AGENDA REQUEST -./rEM NO. (j -' ('5 DATE: June 4, 2002 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT y! TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Pete Keogh Parks & Recreation Director SUBJECT: Amendment to September 8, 1987 Easement between County and City of Fort Pierce - Lawnwood Tennis Courts BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: KIA PREVIOUS ACTION: KIA RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Amendment to Easement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment to Easement. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ..... .,. IXJ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 02-, ~ Douglas Anderson ~(r County Administrator Originating Dept. Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Public Works Dir: County Eng.: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 ;; ,-,. ...., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Pete Keogh, Parks & Recreation Director DATE: May 22, 2002 SUBJECT: Amendment to September 8, 1987 Easement between County and City of Fort Pierce-Lawnwood Tennis Courts ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: In September, 1987, the County granted the City/FPUA a utility easement adjacent to the Lawnwood Tennis Complex. The County now desires to construct a tennis court within the easement area. A copy of a proposed Amendment to Easement is attached. The FPUA has no objection to amending the Easement to allow the County to construct a tennis court within the easement area. The proposed Amendment does provide that the County will bear the expense of restoring the tennis court in the event FPUA needs to service its water lines. There is no alternate location to site the new tennis court. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Amendment to Easement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment to Easement. Pete Ke gh Parks & ecreation Director MAV-23-02 THU 10:32 AM SLC LEISURE SERVICES 407 467 2377 P.0t "': .., Memo To: Pete Keogh From: Woody Newson USPT A Date: May 23, 2002 Subjed: New court placement I would like 10 see the new courts run east from the existing two courts ( courts 1& 2)for the following reasons. )'1, classes will run more efficiently and effectively for parents and teachers. 2nd, It would be impossible to nw classes in two different locations when the High Schools use courts S through 12 next year. 3rd, USTA tournaments would run much smoother and less complicated if the view to aU courts for officials is in a straight line. 41/1 Without a security fence around the whole tennis complex it would be vel}' difficult to maintain safety and security for the tennis center and the tennis playing public. " ,-,. "-tII AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT dated the ____ day of , 2002, by and between BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, Grantor, and the CITY OF FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Florida, for the use and benefit of the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, Grantee, its successors and assigns. WHEREAS, by Easement dated September 8, 1987, recorded in Official Records Book 559, Page 377, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, (the "Easement"), Grantor granted a utility easement to the Grantee encumbering the Real Property described in Exhibit A attached hereto. WHEREAS, Grantor wishes to construct a tennis court within the easement and has requested that the above-described Easement be modified as to the pavement restoration and overlay requirements in the event the Grantee needs to service the water lines located within the Easement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and other valuable considerations, the Grantor and the Grantee hereby agree to amend the above-described Easement by addition of the following paragraph which shall amend and modify the Easement as follows: 1. Grantor, at its expense, may construct a tennis court within the easement described herein. 2. In the event Grantee needs to service its water lines located within the easement, and in the event any part of the tennis court must be demolished in accord to service the water lines, Grantee will bear the expense of demolition of same, and the Grantor will bear the expense of restoration of the tennis courts. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Easement the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ATTEST: By CLERK CHAIRMAN " \w ....I Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: CITY OF FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA A municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Florida, for the use and benefit of the FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY By 206 S. 6th Street Fort Pierce, FL 34950 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared , Chairman and Clerk, of the Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County, Florida, in whose name the foregoing instrument was executed, and that they acknowledged executing same, freely and voluntarily, under authority duly vested in them by said entity, and that I relied upon the following form of identification of the above- named persons: WITNESS my hand and official seal in the State and County last aforesaid this day of April, 2002. , Notary Public, State of Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared , known to me to be the of the CITY OF FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Florida, for \.f ...., the use and benefit of the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, in whose name the foregoing instrument was executed, and that he acknowledged executing same for such limited partnership, freely and voluntarily, under authority duly vested in him by said corporation, and that I relied upon the following form of identification of the above-named person: WITNESS my hand and official seal in the State and County last aforesaid this day of April, 2002. , Notary Public, State of Florida .~ \.f ...., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ..:c....-1 DATE: June 4, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ 1 CONSENT [Xl SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Aariculture PRESENTED BY: Anita S. Neal :1'-// TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-162 Endorsing the efforts of the state of Florida Department of Agriculture and expressing the approval of this Board in the necessary removal of citrus canker in the state of Florida BACKGROUND: see attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL.: n/a PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners adopt Resolution No. 02-162 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: [X~ APPROVED [ ] OTHER: DENIED CONCURRENCE: (>2,~ 4d(" Doug Anderson County Administrator Review and APprovals -1 County Attorney: fjr Management & Budget Purchasing : Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 ¡. ; '-" ..., AGRICULTURE MEMORANDUM TO: Doug Anderson, County Administrator DATE: Anita Neal, Interim County Extension Director t2Jk. OS. /}tAl May 29, 2002 FROM: RE: Endorsement of Resolution No. 02-162 Citrus Canker control In response to a request made by the Highlands County Board of County Commissioners, we are asking the 81. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to approve Resolution No. 02-162 endorsing the State of Florida Department of Agriculture's efforts to control and eradicate citrus canker. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-162 as drafted. ASN/ca ,. '-' ...." RESOLUTION NO. 02-162 A RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE EFFORTS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND EXPRESSING THE APPROVAL OF THIS BOARD IN THE NECESSARY REMOV ALOFCITRUSCANKER IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: I. S1. Lµcie County has a very important citrus industry and is the fourth largest citrus producing county in Florida. 2. The over 103,894 acres of citrus in S1. LuCie County represents a substantial portion of the taxable valuation of St. Lucie County and represents 6% of the 9.1 billion-dollar citrus industry in Florida's economy. 3. Citrus Canker poses a serious threat to the Florida citrus industry and extraordinary measures must be taken to prevent the spread of citrus canker. 4. The State of Florida Department of Agriculture has taken the steps necessary to stop the spread of citrus canker, and has a tremendous depth of knowledge as to what steps are necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby endorse the efforts of the State of Florida Department of Agriculture and expresses the approval of this Board in the necessary removal of citrus canker in the State of Florida. ¡. '-' ,.." 2. The County Administrator is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the Governor of Florida, and the Florida Department of Agriculture. After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XX Vice-Chairman CliffBames XX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 4lh d~y ofJune, 2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CLERK APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY .. '-" ...., Indian River Citrus League P. O. Box 690007 Vera Beach, FL32969 Phone (772) 562-2728 Fax (772) 562-2577 Email: info@ircitrusleague.org May 29,2002 Honorable Doug Coward, Chairman St. Lucie County Commission 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Piece, FL 34982 Dear Commissioners: I understand that the St. Lucie County Board of ComÌnissioners is going to consider a resolution in support of the fight against citrus canker in our county and state. As you are aware, other county's commissioners are taking a less favorable position in the increasing difficuh battle against this insidious bacterial disease. The citrus industry of St.Lucie County and the entire Treasure Coast applauds, and appreciates your concern and support in this vital matter. I hope that the spirit of cooperation that St. Lucie County Commission continues to extend to our industry will persuade others to realize that any delays in fighting this disease ultimately will have a negative impact on the citizens of their counties and the State of Florida in general. Florida's 9.1 billion dollar citrus industry, of which St. Lucie County is the fourth largest producer, is at risk. One of the main economic engines, the citrus industry, which empowers St. Lucie County and our way of life here, is being put at risk. Thank you for acting on your citizen's behalf. Every day of delay allows this devastating disease not only to potentially infect commercial citrus operations, but also increase the spread through dooryard trees. Homeowners, as well as citrus growers of varying size, have been put at risk by not utilizing every available means in the fight against citrus canker. If the League can be of any assistance to you, please do not hesitate in asking. Again, thanks for recognizing the importance of utilizing every available tool in the fight against citrus canker in our county and state. Sincerely, Douglas C. Boumique Executive Vice President