Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05-21-2008 MINUTES OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY Board of Examiners of Contractors Meeting Held in Commission Chambers County Administration Building 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL Wednesday, May 21, 2008 PRESENT Chairman ................................................................................................................Douglas Davis Vice Chairman.........................................................................................................Fred Rohrbough Members..................................................................................................................Haydn Curtis .............................................................................................................................John Langel .............................................................................................................................Michael DiFrancesco .............................................................................................................................Capt. Derek Fox ABSENT Excused Members .................................................................................................Craig Dunkelberger .............................................................................................................................Sean Mitchell .............................................................................................................................Charles James STAFF PRESENT AssistantCounty Attorney.....................................................................................Heather Lueke Code Compliance Manager..................................................................................Chris Lestrange Contractor Licensing Supervisor...........................................................................Swendy Ariyanayagam Contractor Licensing Investigator..........................................................................Monica Barrios Licensing Investigator...........................................................................................Carl Brome Staff Secretary......................................................................................................Elizabeth Lifland Board Recorder....................................................................................................Mary Holleran * Indicates a motion ** Indicates a vote A. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 8:35 a.m. by Chairman, Douglas Davis. B. ROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERS The roll was called and everyone was present except excused members Craig Dunkelberger, Charles James and Sean Mitchell. C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – April 16, 2008 Contractor Examining Licensing Board: ?? Motion was made by Mr. Curtis to approve the Minutes of the April 16, 2008 Contractor’s Licensing Examining Board Meeting. ** Mr. Langel seconded and the motion carried unanimously. D. SWEARING IN OF STAFF The following staff members were sworn in by the staff secretary: Chris Lestrange, Monica Barrios, Carl Brome and Swendy Ariyanayagam. E. APPLICATIONS TO BE APPROVED: No applicants were pulled for discussion or consideration. BY CONSENT VOTE: ?? Motion was made by Mr. Langel to approve the applicants recommended by Consent vote. BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CONTRACTORS MEETING May 21, 2008 ** Mr. Curtis seconded and the motion carried unanimously. The names were read into the record: QualifierBusiness Name Type of Contractor Russel Lumsden Gatesystems Unlimited, Inc. Fence Specialty Contractor Andrew N. Tenneboe Andrew Norman Tenneboe Journeyman Electrician Joseph L. Timaltre Joseph L.Timaltre Journeyman Electrician Wayne E. Bragg Precise Painting of St. Lucie, Co., LLC Painting Specialty Contractor Landis Wright Wright & Ragland Electrical Contracting Electrical Registered Contractor LLC Patrick Norbert Guettler Innovation Irrigation, LLC Sprinkler Irrigation Contractor Charles McKenna Storm Team Shutters, LLC Hurricane Protection Specialty Cont. APPLICATIONS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY RECIPROCITY: ?? Mr. Langel made a motion to approve the applicants recommended for approval by reciprocity. ** Capt. Fox seconded and the motion carried unanimously. The names were read into the record: Qualifier Business Name Type of Contractor Joseph A. Rosso, II Rosso Paving & Drainage, Inc. Paving Specialty Frank E. Pacacha All Star Carpentry Corp. Carpentry Specialty Catherina E. Nesci Nesci Tile & Marble, Inc. Tile & Marble Specialty Steven Brian Ditzel Stevee D. Electric, Inc. Electrical Registered Contractor Rupert L. Jones East Coast Shutter Man, Inc. Hurricane Protection Specialty Mark J. Okerman Pinnacle Painting & Waterproofing, Inc. Painting Specialty APPLICATIONS APPROVED ADMINISTRATIVELY BASED ON RECIPROCITY FROM THE CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE OR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE: The applicant’s names were read into the record. Qualifier Business Name Type of Contractor Daryle Allen Walke Tile It of the Treasure Coast, Inc. Tile & Marble Specialty Robert Richard Jasper Robert Jasper, LLC Concrete Specialty Contractor Vitali Boderak Pools by Vatali, Inc Pool/Spa Residential Contractor Leroy William Wise Wise Choice Plumbing, Inc., d/b/a Plumbing Registered Contractor Mr. Rooter of IR., St. Lucie & Okeechobee Counties James Joseph Young, Jr. Records Vault, Inc., d/b/a/ Interlocking Pavers Block Contractor Encompass Brick Pavers F. CITATION APPEAL: Against: WJM Building Resources Inc., 5260 John David Rd., St. Cloud, Fl. 34771 Violation: Working without a Certificate of Competency in St. Lucie County Investigator: Swendy Ariyanayagam Recommendation: $500.00 penalty Page 2 of 9 BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CONTRACTORS MEETING May 21, 2008 Ms. Ariyanayagam reviewed the citation and provided three photos taken on 5/5/08 and a copy of a letter from the th, General Contractor. On May 52008 a citation was issued for WJM Building Resources, Inc., for erecting a metal building without a Certificate of Competency in St. Lucie County. All of the workers at the job site indicated they were employed by WJM Building Resources, Inc., and have been paid by them. A vehicle on the side also had a WJM Building Resources, Inc. logo. She spoke with Mr. Mathis, the owner of WJM Building Resources, Inc., he stated he was working under a general contractor, Ray Parsons, who qualified the Company, Central Florida Building Corporation. Mr. Parsons’ letter stated they didn’t qualify WJM Building Resources, Inc. for this job at the time the citation was issued and the Office Manager said they did not sub-contract WJM Building Resources, Inc. for this job. Staff believes that the citation was issued correctly as at the time the citation was issued WJM Building Resources, Inc., did not hold a Certificate of Competency. Mr. Davis confirmed Ms. Ariyanayagam’s review of the citation, who she contacted and who Mr. Mathis said he was working under. William W. Mathis, Jr., 5269 John David Road, St. Cloud, Fl., 34771, d/b/a/ WJM Building Resources, Inc., was sworn in. He said WTB is a holding company out of Georgia, and they were subbed out to do the job and were under the impression they didn’t have to pull a permit to do the job by the owner, John Reynolds. They have since found they are not covered by the General Contractor’s permit. Mr. Davis clarified that Mr. Mathis believed he was working under WTB Holdings, a contractor out of Georgia, who sold Mr. Reynolds the building, and he was working as a subcontractor. Mr. Davis advised he still needed to hold a license for that general contractor even though working for them, in the State of Florida. Mr. Davis commented that he brought up the fines to be increased for violations such as this, since it runs licensed contractors out of work. ?? Mr. Langel made a motion to deny the Citation Appeal and the fine stands at $500.00 for the violation. ** Mr. Rohrbough seconded the motion. Mr. Davis questioned if the fine could be altered. Ms. Lueke advised the Board has a chart of the amount of the fines passed by the BCC. The Board can reduce the fine, but can not raise it based upon Mr. Mathis’ appeal, as that would be punishing him for appealing his case. This fine must stand. The BCC can approve making it higher. ** The seconded motion was called for a voice vote: Mr. Rohrbough-yes; Mr. Davis-yes; Mr. Langel-yes; Mr. Curtis- yes; Mr. DiFrancesco-yes; Capt. Fox-yes. The motion carried unanimously. Ms. Lueke advised Mr. Mathis if wished to appeal the decision of this Board before the Board of County Commissioners it had to be done within 30 days. G. DISCIPLINARY CASES: Against: Scott’s Screen, LLC, Qualifier: Scott Barber #C/C 24365, One Expired Permit Violation: SLC CCL 2-5-20 Revocation or Suspension of Certificate of Competency Subsection (3) Willfully disregards and violates an applicable state or local Building code, regulation or law, and SLC Land Development Code 11.05.01 (2) a. Time Limitation of Building Permits Complaint Filed by: Staff Investigator: Monica Barrios No one was present to represent Mr. Barber. Ms. Barrios provided a list of the expired permit. Staff notified Mr. Barber on 1/10/08 of the expired permit that needed to be renewed and pass final inspection. A Notice to Appear was sent on 4/15/08. Staff has had some communication with Mr. Barber. As of 5/21/08 the permit remains expired. Staff Recommendation: If Mr. Barber is found in violation staff recommends that the Certificate of Competency be suspended in St. Lucie County until the expired permit has been renewed and receives a final inspection. Term of suspension not to exceed one (1) year. Page 3 of 9 BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CONTRACTORS MEETING May 21, 2008 ?? Mr. Curtis made a motion to support staff’s recommendation that Scott Barber’s Certificate of Competency be suspended in St. Lucie County until all expired permits are renewed and receive a final inspection. Term of suspension not to exceed one (1) year. ** Mr. DiFrancesco seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Against: A+ Fence Co. of the Treasure Coast, Kennith Maddens Qualifier, C/Competency #22501 Expired permits Violation: SLC CCL 2-5-20 Revocation or Suspension of Certificate of Competency Subsection (3) Willfully disregards and violates an applicable state or local Building code, regulation or law, and SLC Land Development Code 11.05.01 (2) a. Time Limitation of Building Permits Complaint Filed by: Staff Investigator: Monica Barrios Ms. Barrios provided a list of the two expired permits. On 4/15/08 staff notified A* Fence Co. of the Treasure Coast, and Mr. Maddens of the expired permits which needed to be renewed and receive a final inspection. Staff has had some communication with him, and as of 5/21/08 the permits remain expired. No one was present to represent Kennith Maddens, Qualifier, d/b/a A+ Fence Co. of the Treasure Coast. Mr. Davis commented on the dates of the expired permits. Ms. Barrios said they were renewed, but have again expired. Ms. Barrios was unsure of what work had been done, and no inspections were made. Staff’s Recommendation: If Mr. Maddens is found in violation staff recommends that the Certificate of Competency be suspended in St. Lucie County until all expired permits are renewed and receive a final inspection. Term of suspension not to exceed one (1) year. Mr. Davis verified the dates of the permits, and the date of his license. Staff noted there was a typo and he had a license when he pulled the permits. The projects were completed and the fences were not inspected. No one was present to represent Kennith Maddens. ?? Mr. DiFrancesco made a motion to accept staff’s recommendation and suspend Kennith Maddens Certificate of Competency until all expired permits are renewed and receive a final inspection. Term of suspension not to exceed one (1) year. ** Mr. Langel seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Against: Gregory K. Wigham, d/b/a/ WO Gregory Construction, Inc. Violation: Section: 2-5-19, (9) Commit any willful, fraudulent act as a contractor as a result of which another is financially injured. SLC CCL 2-5-20 Revocation or Suspension of Certificate of Competency Subsection (3) Willfully disregards and violates an applicable state or local Building code, regulation or law, and (10) Committing fraud or deceit or other misconduct in the practice of contracting. Complaint Filed by: Staff Investigator: Carl Brome Page 4 of 9 BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CONTRACTORS MEETING May 21, 2008 Mr. Brome provided an Investigative Report that outlined the formal complaint received on 3/21/07. The homeowner, Adam DiMarco contracted with Gregory Construction Inc. for replacement of a storm damaged pool enclosure on 11/18/05. Mr. DiMarco paid the full amount of $17,828.00 plus an additional amount of $686. As of 5/21/08 the permit has expired, and the structure has been built and failed the final inspection due to several discrepancies. Mr. DiMarco wants the structure to pass the final inspection. Staff has contacted the contractor, and has been unable to resolve the issue. The contractor has 3 other expired permits in St. Lucie County. Staff’s Recommendation: If Gregory K. Wigham d/b/a/ WO Gregory Construction, Inc. is found in violation that the permitting privileges be suspended in St. Lucie County until all expired permits are renewed and receive a final inspection. Term of suspension not to exceed one (1) year. It is further recommended that a copy of the Board’s Order and the Findings of Fact in this case be sent to the Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board for the Certified Building Contractor’s License be placed for review. No one was present to represent Gregory K. Wigham. ?? Mr. DiFrancesco made a motion in reference to the complaints against Gregory Wigham, WO Gregory Construction, Inc., that the Board make the following determination: that we accept staff’s recommendation that Gregory Wigham, WO Gregory Construction, Inc., shall have their permitting privileges be suspended in St. Lucie County until all expired permits are renewed and receive a final inspection. Term of suspension not to exceed one (1) year. It is further recommended that a copy of the Board’s Order and the Findings of Fact in this case be sent to the Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board for the Certified General Contractor’s License be placed for review. ** Mr. Langel seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Against: Alton M. Silver, III, Corp. Qualifier, Alton M. Silver, III C/Competency #21202, Residential State Contractor, ## RR0067698 Expired permit Summary Violation: SLC CCL 2-5-19 (4) and SLC CCL 2-5-20 Revocation or Suspension of Certificate of Competency Subsection (3) Willfully disregards and violates an applicable state or local Building code, regulation or law, and Complaint Filed by: Staff Investigator: Swendy Ariyanayagam Ms. Ariyanayagam reviewed the violation, submitted a copy of the Sheriff’s Inmate Information Sheet from Indian River County and reviewed the convictions displayed. Mr. Silver has been doing business under false information provided to St. Lucie County and other areas under a false name. He was arrested on 3/31/08 in Indian River County and extradited to Suffolk County, New York. No one was present to represent Alton M. Silver, III Staff’s Recommendation: If Alton M. Silver, III is found in violation that his Certificate of Competency be revoked permanently in St. Lucie County. It is further recommended that a copy of the Board’s Order and the Findings of Fact in this case be sent to the Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board. ?? Mr. Curtis made a motion in reference to Alton M. Silver, III, to accept staff’s recommendation that his Certificate of Competency be revoked permanently in St. Lucie County, and that a copy of the Board’s Order and the Findings of Fact in this case be sent to the Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board. ** Mr. DiFrancesco seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Page 5 of 9 BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CONTRACTORS MEETING May 21, 2008 H. OLD BUSINESS: Danny Joe McFarland, D M Agriculture At last month’s meeting Mr. Broom reviewed the citation of Danny Joe McFarland, d/b/a DM Agriculture. Mr. McFarland was cited for working without a Certificate of Competency in St. Lucie County. At that meeting staff was requested to provide more information to the Board on the State’s Statute. On 3/19/08 Mr. MacFarland was found constructing a pole barn on the property located at 5700 Sunshine Farms Way, Palm City, Fl. Mr. MacFarland is not a licensed contractor, and is in violation of St. Lucie County Code and Complied Laws 2-5-5. A stop work order was issued and a citation was hand delivered. Mr. MacFarland requested a hearing to appeal the citation, and is present today. Three photos were re-submitted dated 3/19/08. A locational permit was granted for the pole barn only. Ms. Ariyanayagam contacted Mr. Ed Garcia, Director of the Treasure Coast and Palm Beaches and Contracting Licensing Officials of Florida about the agricultural licensing exemption, and both said there was no licensing exemption specified for agricultural properties. Staff believes the citation was issued correctly since Mr. MacFarland does not hold a Certificate of Competency in St. Lucie County. Mr. MacFarland was not exempt from having a contractor’s license, the property owner could construct it, but Mr. MacFarland was not the owner of the property. Mr. Rohrbough commented on pole barns being constructed on large ranches all the time, and are built by employees of the ranch. That this could open up a hornet’s nest. Ms. Ariyanayagam reiterated they must be licensed contractors. Ms. Lueke advised they would have to follow the Owner/Builder Exemption, “...all owners of property acting as their own contractor must provide on-site supervision themselves, for all work performed by unlicensed contractors”....and “...if the owner is doing the supervision, if they are acting as their own GC, that is acceptable under the Owner/Builder exemption. If the owner hires an unlicensed contractor to do supervision for him, the owner can’t delegate the owner’s responsibility to supervise work unless the person is registered or certified.” Ms. Lueke clarified this citation addresses the unlicensed contractor and did not speak to the permit; the Statute is talking about the need to have a licensed contractor. Discussion ensued on this issue. Ms. Lueke read State Statute #489.103, paragraph 7. Danny Joe MacFarland, 6700 Sunshine Farms Way, Palm City, Fl., was sworn in by Ms. Lifland. At last month’s meeting he provided a copy of the Florida Statute regarding agricultural property and believed it pre-empted the County from enforcing Codes relating to the building of non-residential farm buildings on agricultural property, and noted the absence of any case law. From a letter he referenced, he asked if the person who hired him, knowing that he was unlicensed, broke the law? He reiterated that he has been building pole barns for 25 years and never received a citation. He discussed other sections of the Florida Statutes to prove his opinion that he doesn’t have to be a licensed contractor to build a non-residential agricultural building on a piece of agricultural substantiated farm land. Mr. Davis listened to Mr. MacFarland’s presentation and did not hear it specifically address the issue of licensure in relation to a contractor working for an agricultural property owner. It talked about exempting agricultural projects from State and Local Codes meeting design standards, and gives you the ability to design yourself, so you don’t have to create an Engineer Set of Drawings for the Building Dept., and excludes you from having to go through the permitting process. He further explained that staff and Legal Counsel advised the issue was, can this project be erected and the structure built by someone outside of the employees of the property owner. He heard the interpretation that it does require licensure for someone outside the employee of the property owner. What he heard Mr. MacFarland read, didn’t address that at all. Mr. MacFarland disagreed and referred to the Attorney General’s Opinion. Ms. Lueke re-read the Statute – Section 489.103, paragraph 7. She agreed with the Attorney General’s Opinion that the County could not pass any Resolution or Ordinance that would require him to follow a different Code and require a permit. This Opinion doesn’t state anything about the State Law that requires licensed contractors to do work. The only Section that addresses this is the Owner/Builder Exemption. In order for the owner to use that, the owner would have to do direct supervision, he can’t delegate that, unless you are a licensed contractor. It isn’t a County Law, it’s a State Law which the County is following. Mr. MacFarland said he was hired and he told the owner he was an unlicensed contractor. Ms. Lueke said the County could cite the owner to the Code Enforcement Board for hiring an unlicensed contractor but that is a separate issue. The fact that Mr. MacFarland was doing unlicensed work made him subject to the citation. Page 6 of 9 BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CONTRACTORS MEETING May 21, 2008 Mr. Davis said it was clear that Mr.MacFarland did not address the issue charged by staff and counsel, and he did not add anything to cause the citation being filed incorrectly. Legal Counsel’s advice was clearly presented and he is in violation. He could see the confusion and was an excuse to an extent and that it’s being done out there, but he was guilty of doing the work outside of the licensure, and would consider leniency for the fine. Mr. Rohrbough said if we are only looking for a license, what license is required, General Contractor, Carpentry? Ms. Ariyanayagam explained a Carpentry license would be sufficient to erect a Pole Barn, he would need to take the trade exam and be certified. Discussion ensued on the scope of work included for carpentry and general contractor. Ms. Ariyanayagam explained that other counties have their own regulations. Capt. Fox discussed the locational permit, and said we could possibly make a public service announcement for agricultural projects that when they come in and apply for a locational permit, so that the property owner understands that if they aren’t performing the work under the auspices of their own employee base, they will be required to have licensed contractors perform the work. ?? Mr. Curtis made a motion in reference to Danny Joe MacFarland, D M Agriculture, and recommended reducing the fine to $250.00. That the Board has found a finding of fact that Mr. MacFarland is guilty of constructing a pole barn without a license but under the circumstances to reduce his fine to $250.00. ** The motion failed for lack of a second.. * Mr. DiFrancesco made a motion in reference to Danny Joe MacFarland, D M Agriculture, to keep the fine at $500.00 based on staff’s recommendation. The motion failed for lack of a second. ** Mr. Davis concurred with both motions on the finding of fact and guilt on the part of Mr. MacFarland for working without a license. He passed the gavel to Mr. Rohrbough, Vice Chair, to make a motion. ?? Mr. Davis made a motion “in reference to Danny Joe MacFarland and said, I believe the Finding of Fact is the work was being performed outside of the State required licensure and was brought to our attention by staff, the finding of guilt has been found and through leniency I believe that he has been contracting in this fashion for some number of years and although ignorance of the law is no excuse, I do believe that he has not understood this, and as of today, whether he agrees or disagrees, he has heard us and I think we would reduce the fine to $250.00.” ** Mr. Curtis seconded the motion. Mr. DiFrancesco: commented on unlicensed contractors being rampant in St. Lucie County, he supported having a licensed contractor doing the work when the work is permitted. Mr. Rohrbough: saw the Board’s and Mr. MacFarland’s point, Mr. MacFarland did what he thought he was supposed to do and is now caught in the middle. He’s been doing this work for 25/30 years and is just now being fined; he thought the $500 fine was not the issue, and asked what will happen in the future. He would like to see Mr. MacFarland licensed, but the fine of $500 won’t stop others out there. Mr. Davis: he may be doing the work, but he needs to have a license for being a contractor. Further discussion ensued. ** A voice vote was taken on Mr. Davis’ motion: Mr. Rohrbough-yes; Mr. Davis-yes; Mr. Langel-yes; Mr. Curtis-yes; Mr. DiFrancesco-yes; Captain Fox-yes; The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Davis said Mr. MacFarland heard the unanimous vote, he referred to Capt. Fox’s earlier suggestion regarding locational permits and a public announcement, and he thanked Mr. MacFarland for coming in. Mr. MacFarland said he will be appealing this as far as it takes, the money isn’t the issue. He thanked the Board th for reducing the fine. Ms. Lueke advised him if he wanted to appeal the decision, it will be appealed to the 19 Circuit Court, as a Petition of Writ of Cert, and must be done within 30 days of the meeting. Ms. Lueke said he could call her or staff with any questions. Page 7 of 9 BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CONTRACTORS MEETING May 21, 2008 0LD BUSINESS: Hill & Hill Painting Corp., Daryl D. Hill, Certificate of Competency #20604 The case was brought before the April 18, 2007 Licensing Board meeting, and Mr. Broder did not attend (a letter was provided and explained the reason for two canceled meetings). Minutes of the meeting were provided. The homeowner was unsatisfied with the job and damages to the home. Staff recommended this is to be a civil matter and was asked to bring it back pending the outcome of the civil case, and the Board requested proof from that case. Staff stands on their recommendation that the case is a civil matter. Bram Broder, 5510 Casio Drive, Indian River Estates, Fort Pierce, was sworn in by Ms. Lifland. Mr. Broder reiterated the former complaint in detail, and displayed a copy of the executed release he accepted from Hill & Hill Painting Corporation (insured). Mr. Broder was of the opinion that the license of Daryl Hill should be revoked because of the damages to his house and other potential consumers. Mr. Broder explained the content of his law suit and the amounts he spent pursuing the case. Ms. Lueke clarified that Mr. Hill was not guilty or convicted of any criminal offense. She advised the Board the difference between this case and one heard earlier, was this job was finished and inspected, and in the former case heard, the job was not finished or inspected. In this case the homeowner was not satisfied with the job. She confirmed that Mr. Broder signed a release in settlement of the contract. She advised Mr. Broder that unless he had a finding of fact from the Civil Court that the job was done incorrectly, this Board could not take any action at this stage. Mr. Broder asked if the Board would accept a report as an exhibit. Ms. Lueke confirmed this Board would have to find a section of the Code that the Contractor had violated; the Contractor had to be notified of the violation; then the homeowner would present evidence that the Section of the Code had been violated; the Contractor would present evidence that he did not violate that section of the Code, and then the Board would decide if there was a violation, what kind of disciplinary action is necessary. Staff has not been able to find a section of the Code that addresses this issue. It would be up to Mr. Broder to find a section of the Code that staff has missed. Ms. Ariyanayagam said there was a dispute between Mr. Broder and Hill & Hill about an amount they were willing to pay, and Mr. Broder refused that amount, and it is a Civil matter. Staff asked the Board for direction if they wished to pursue this. Mr. Rohrbough commented that it was a Civil matter, the job is done, and it is not the Board’s responsibility to chase this down; without a direct violation of the Code, it is not within the purview of the Board. As it stands, Mr. Broder accepted a settlement through Mediation, and he must have read the settlement which released Hill and Hill from liability, and blew this Board out of the water in taking any action. Ms. Lueke advised that with no finding by a Judge that the contractor was at fault, and a settlement accepted through mediation, this Board has no facts on which to base any action. Staff addressed the issue of standards for painting, and what other localities do regarding inspection and approval. Ms. Ariyanayagam said staff did check and no one requires permits for painting. Mr. Lestrange further explained the process and discussion ensued. No further action was taken by the Board on Bram Broder’s Civil matter. I. NEW BUSINESS: Ms. Ariyanayagam said the County was proposing an Ordinance to fingerprint new contractors. TheState is now requiring it, and the Ordinance will be going before the BCC. th The Board was advised there will not be a meeting in June. The next meeting is scheduled for July 16. J. PUBLIC COMMENT: None Page 8 of 9 BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CONTRACTORS MEETING May 21, 2008 K. ADJOURNMENT: There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 11:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, -------------------------------------------------- Douglas Davis, Chairman ----------------------------------------------------- Mary F. Holleran, Specialist Consultant Page 9 of 9