HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05-06-2009
MINUTES OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD HEARING
May 6, 2009 - 9:00 am
HELD IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS
ROGER POITRAS ANNEX
2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE
FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA
PRESENT
Vice Chairman…………………………………………………………………………. Phillip Stickles
Board Members……………………………………………………………………….. Ray Hofmann
.............................................................................................................................Ralph Fogg
.............................................................................................................................Margaret Monahan
.............................................................................................................................Mitchell Williford
Wes Taylor
Board Attorney .....................................................................................................Jack Krieger
ABSENT
Chairman (Excused)…………………………………………………………………… Dr. Dale Ingersoll
STAFF PRESENT
Assistant County Attorney .....................................................................................Katherine Mackenzie-Smith
Code Compliance Manager ..................................................................................Chris Lestrange
Code Enforcement Supervisor ..............................................................................Dennis Bunt
Contractor Licensing Supervisor ...........................................................................Swendy Ariyanayagam
Contractor Licensing Investigator ..........................................................................Monica Barrios
Code Enforcement Officer ....................................................................................Melissa Brubaker
Code Enforcement Officer ....................................................................................Carl Brome
Code Enforcement Officer ....................................................................................Chris Counselor
Code Enforcement Officer ....................................................................................Mark Fowler
Code Enforcement Office......................................................................................Lynn Swartzel
Zone Compliance Officer ......................................................................................Danielle Williams
Board Secretary ...................................................................................................Shirley Walls
Board Recorder ....................................................................................................Mary Holleran
* Indicates a motion ** Indicates a vote
*** For the record comment
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Code Enforcement Board meeting was called to order at 9:06 a.m. by Mr. Stickles, Vice Chairman. He
welcomed new Board Member Wes Taylor who will replace resigned Board Member William Oquendo.
B. PLEDGE TO THE FLAG
All those present rose to pledge allegiance to the flag.
C. ROLL CALL
Everyone was present for roll call except Dr. Ingersoll, who was excused.
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – April 1, 2009
Mr. Hofmann noted a correction to the minutes: On page 3/12, Mr. Stickles made the motion, and
Second for the motion was Mr. Hofmann. Correction was so noted. Mr. Hofmann commented on the
correct spelling of his name. Recorder so noted, with apology.
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD May 6, 2008
* No action was taken on approving the minutes. They will be re-distributed for approval at the next
meeting.
E. SWEARING IN OF STAFF MEMBERS
Chris Lestrange, Dennis Bunt, Swendy Ariyanayagam, Monica Barrios, Melissa Brubaker, Carl Brome, Chris
Counsellor, Mark Fowler, Lynn Swartzel, and Danielle Williams were sworn in.
F. CONSENT AGENDA
Mr. Stickles pulled the following two cases for discussion and questioned staff on the fine reductions:
Case #47396, Thomas Mee. Mr. Bunt explained that Wells Fargo took over the property on 10/6/07, the property
has been demolished and cleaned up by Community Service and Housing Dept., and a lien was placed against
Wells Fargo. Staff recommended the fine be reduced to zero.
Case #Case #49928 – Joseph Williams. Ms. Ariyanayagam explained the case was open for more than two
years, staff received little cooperation, the bank owned the property for a year before obtaining a permit and
bringing it into compliance. It was up to the Board whether they wished to reduce it. Discussion ensued on
foreclosure properties. Staff recommended. denial. Ms. Monahan was not in favor.
There was no further discussion.
* Ms. Monahan made a motion in reference to the cases read into the record that the Code Enforcement
Board accept and adopt the Consent Agenda as submitted.
** Mr. Hofmann seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
Satisfaction of Lien Case No.
Daniel and Genelle Z. Yost 16083
Anne Colburn A/K/A Ann. L. Colburn 27323
Release of Lien Case No.
Melanie A. Smith/Melanie Crippen-Lashbrook 8616
Rescind Finding of Fact Case No.
Rose Marie Long 60710
Rescind Find of Fact & Order Imposing Fine Lien Case No.
Debra A. Hall 60632
Sheila F. Waddell 6656
Rescind Imposing Fine Case No.
Deborah Adams 45768
Deborah Adams 48814
Fine Reductions Case No.
Thomas Mee 47396
Joseph Williams 49928
G. VIOLATION HEARING:
The following cases were removed, withdrawn or abated from the agenda:
Case No. Location of Violation Owner/Violator/Name____________
61721 9675 Rangeline Rd., Port St. Lucie Florida Tire Recycling, Inc, S/A
60786 5090 Southwind Trail, Fort Pierce Fred G. Snow, S/A
61022 5747 Briargate Lane, Fort Pierce Scott’s Screen, LLC, Scott Barber
2061 SW Imperial St., Port St. Lucie
Page 2 of 8
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD May 6, 2008
59873 5747 Briargate Lane, Fort Pierce Alyssa J. Maloy, S/A
52357 5910 S. US #1, Fort Pierce Dave Henry, LAMAR, 3760 New Tampa Hwy.
Lakeland, FL
60296 5612 Sunset Blvd., Fort Pierce Susan A. Vareha, S/A
60294 5612 Sunset Blvd., Fort Pierce Daniel Warren, Contractor, 1440 Coral Ridge Dr., #104
Coral Springs, Fl
58252 86 El Mar Dr., Jensen Beach John & Cynthia Marchin, 54231 Shady Lane
Shelby Township, Fl
61753 Notlem Dr., Fort Pierce Leo Cueto & Robert Lazar, 3167 SW Bessey Creek Tr.
Palm City, Fl
60345 6704 Brookline Ave., Fort Pierce Edward & Lee An Hickman, S/A
60096 7303 Brookline Ave., Fort Pierce Justin R. Laguerre, 4834 Oleans Court, #C
West Palm Beach
61995 8301 Deland, Fort Pierce Harry Righton, 585 W. Point Crt., SW, Vero Beach
61550 920 So. Lake Dr., Fort Pierce Rohit & Ranjana Patel, 630 SW Palmetto Cove, Ft. Pierce
VIOLATION CASES HEARD:
Case #56042, Location of violation, 8404 Paso Robles Blvd., Port St. Lucie, Property Owner, Donald A. Koester,
S/A, was sworn in by Ms. Walls.
Mr. Brome provided two photos dated 6/10/08. On 11/11/07 the property was found in violation of Section
11.05.01, Building and Sign Permits, please obtain a permit for the concrete slab at the rear of the house and the
screen enclosure. A compliance date of 12/28/07 was issued. Staff has had contact with the owners to discuss
ways to correct the violation. This case has been active for over a year and one-half, the permit has not been
applied for, and the property remains in violation.
Mr. Koester agreed he was in violation. He had to first bring a shed up to Code and into compliance, and had no
funds to bring the rest of the property into compliance. He now has a contract and is waiting on the engineering
drawings before he can apply for the permit. He asked for additional time and the Board agreed.
?
Mr. Fogg made a motion in reference to Case #56042 that the Code Enforcement Board make the
following determination: After hearing the facts in this case, the testimony, and the recommendations of
staff with regard to the existence of a violation that we determine the violation in fact did occur and the
alleged violator committed the violation. An Order of Enforcement is warranted. If the Order of
Enforcement is not complied with by September 1, 2009 a fine of up to $250.00 per day may be imposed.
st
Please take notice that on the 1 Wednesday of the month after the date given for compliance, at 9:00 am
or soon thereafter, as may be heard, a Fine Hearing will be held if the violation is not abated by the given
compliance date.
** Mr. Hofmann seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
The following two were companion cases heard at the same time.
Case #62095, Location of violation, 9501 Reserve Blvd., Port St. Lucie, Property Owner MGA LLC, S/A.
Ataul Haq was sworn in by Ms. Walls.
Ms. Williams provided photos dated 3/29/09 through 5/3/09, and copies of flyers advertising a night club on Friday
and Saturday nights. This is in violation of Section 3.01.03(S) – CG –Commercial General (a night club/bar is not
a permitted use in commercial, general zoning – cease operation until a conditional use permit is obtained.
On 10/14/08 she received a complaint from surrounding neighbors that the restaurant was being turned into a
night club on Friday and Saturday nights. Staff did an inspection on Friday and Saturday nights and found that a
night club is being operated, and found illegal parking on the grass and the neighboring property. Staff also found
the night club is generating a lot of noise, which is being handled by staff by a citation process. A notice of
violation was issued on 3/11/09 to the property owner to obtain a Conditional Use Permit which is needed for
operating a night club. Staff met with the property owners on two occasions and informed them that Conditional
Use permit was needed for a night club. On 3/30/09 Ms. Williams received a Faxed copy of two leases from the
property owner saying he sub-leased the property as a night club to two different companies on Friday and
Saturday. On 4/17/09 the property owner went to the Planning Dept. to obtain an application for Conditional Use.
On 4/21/09 a Notice of Violation was issued for appearance before the Board today.
Page 3 of 8
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD May 6, 2008
As of today, May 6, 2009 the application for a Conditional Use Permit has not been submitted and as of May 3,
2009 the night club is still being operated. Staff recommends that the night club operation cease, which is not
permitted for use until the application for Conditional Use is obtained and approved.
Companion Case:
Case #62069, Location of violation, 9501 Reserve Blvd., Port St. Lucie, Property Owner MGA LLC, S/A.
Ataul Haq was sworn in by Ms. Walls.
Ms. Brubaker provided photos dated 4/19/09 through 5/3/09. During numerous inspections by staff they found a
night club being operated and customers parking on the right-of-way (ROW) and the adjacent property which is in
Violation of Section 7.06.01(D), Off-street parking and loading, Change in Use (cease having customers park on
other properties, they are allowed to park only on your property). Section 7.09.00, Landscaping and screening –
(cease from having customers park on other properties, they are allowed to park on your property only). A
compliance date of March 30, 2009 was issued. Staff has had two meetings with the owner and night club DJ
and discussed the ways to correct the violations, in which the applicant has taken the application from Growth
Management. As of May 3, 2009 cars are still being parked on adjacent property and the ROW and still remains
in violation.
Mr. Haq said they could argue but he was not in violation. As to the night club issue, the operation inside the night
club is not actually a night club, they are a restaurant, they have guests and patrons who request music for their
entertainment, they asked for a band, and he has hired a DJ for dancing and a promotion company. He asked
them not to promote as a night club, but more as a social club as he is a restaurant owner. He has applied for the
Conditional Use permit from Growth Management only for two hours for parking on the grass.
Ms. Monahan questioned the hours of operation and how many cars were parked on the grass. Mr. Haq said for
two hours only, and 160 cars are parked on the grass. The restaurant has a license and no regular hours of
operation, the capacity is determined by the Fire Marshal, as is the parking. He said they don’t have sufficient
parking.
Mr. Stickles explained with the Occupational License for the restaurant, patron capacity and parking is based on
sq. footage and the night club operation is not intended to occur with a dance floor and DJ after the restaurant
hours close. The restaurant does not serve dinner after 10:00 p.m., and they serve a bar food menu.
Ms. Mackenzie Smith showed Mr. Haq sub-lease documents which he confirmed he recognized, as MGA LLC,
and (inaudible). Ms. Mackenzie Smith had Mr. Haq read the first line of the sub-lease, (copy shown to the Board)
as to what was permitted.
Ms. Monahan confirmed Mr. Haq had the application for the Conditional Use. She commented on the
overcapacity of the number of people and the Fire Dept. issue for both inside and outside the property, and the
noise issue on the weekend. Mr. Bunt confirmed the noise level had been monitored with a meter. Discussion
ensued on Mr. Haq running a night club, the hours of operation both the restaurant and night club. Mr. Stickles
referred to the sublease applying to Saturdays for five hours each week from 10:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. and quoted
what was included in the rent from that space, without selling food and drink, just supplying the music and dance
floor to entertain patrons at the restaurant, that they were in violation of running a night club and had to cease and
desist, as well as correcting their parking violation. Mr. Haq debated the comments.
Ms. Brubaker confirmed the parking violations continued even though they had two meetings with Mr. Haq. Mr.
Haq thought that applying for the permit allowed the parking. The areas of the parking violations were discussed.
Mr. Fogg confirmed the permit for the restaurant and the subleasing and agreed with the violation. Mr. Haq
agreed he had to submit the permit to Growth Management and get approved. Mr. Stickles advised him of
following all the proper procedures before he could run a night club. Mr. Hofmann questioned the cost of entry,
gate charges and other charges being paid to Mr. Haq.
Mr. Turner questioned whether law enforcement had activity had occurred during the weekend. Mr. Haq
explained the Fire Marshal issue and said they have eight bouncers for control of the night club.
?
Mr. Fogg made a motion in reference to Case #62095 that the Code Enforcement Board make the
following determination: After hearing the facts in this case, the testimony, and the recommendations of
staff with regard to the existence of a violation that we determine the violation in fact did occur and the
alleged violator committed the violation. An Order of Enforcement is warranted. If the Order of
Page 4 of 8
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD May 6, 2008
Enforcement is not complied with by August 1, 2009 a fine of up to $250.00 per day may be imposed.
st
Please take notice that on the 1 Wednesday of the month after the date given for compliance, at 9:00 am
or soon thereafter, as may be heard, a Fine Hearing will be held if the violation is not abated by the given
compliance date.
** Mr. Williford seconded the motion.
Ms. Monahan could not support the motion; in the past the Board has always looked at the best interest of the
health and welfare of the community and County residents and allowing an unpermitted night club to operateall
summer long was not in their best interests.
?
Mr. Fogg amended his motion to have the Order of Enforcement complied with by June 30, 2009.
** Mr. Williford amended his second to the motion and it carried 5-1. Ms. Monahan opposed and believed
the date for compliance should be June 5, 2009.
?
Mr. Fogg made a motion in reference to Case #62069 that the Code Enforcement Board make the
following determination: After hearing the facts in this case, the testimony, and the recommendations of
staff with regard to the existence of a violation that we determine the violation in fact did occur and the
alleged violator committed the violation. An Order of Enforcement is warranted. If the Order of
Enforcement is not complied with by June 30, 2009 a fine of up to $250.00 per day may be imposed.
st
Please take notice that on the 1 Wednesday of the month after the date given for compliance, at 9:00 am
or soon thereafter, as may be heard, a Fine Hearing will be held if the violation is not abated by the given
compliance date.
** Mr. Williford seconded the motion.
Ms. Monahan commented on the difference in the violations, the first case was based on the conditional use
permit and this violation is simply getting it corrected to not have parking on other properties. No extra time is
needed to correct the violation.
?
Mr. Fogg rescinded his motion. He made an amended motion to go with staff’s recommendation to have
the Order of Enforcement complied with by June 5, 2009.
** Mr. Williford rescinded his second. Mr. Williford seconded Mr. Fogg’s amended motion and it carried
unanimously.
Mr. Stickles clarified the Board’s action for Mr. Haq, he has until June 5, 2009 to get the parking under control to
correct that violation, and he has until June 30, 2009 to get the night club under control and correct that violation.
The Hall was sounded and Ms. Monahan read the names and numbers of the cases of those not present
into the record:
Case No. Location of Violation Property Owner/Contractor Violator
rd
61427 2215 N. 53 St., Fort Pierce U.S. Bank, NA (TR) ASC, 3476 Stateview Blvd., Fort Mill, SC
61333 5910 S. US #1, Fort Pierce Dave Henry Construction LLC, Dave B. Henry, 3936 Lehman Ct.
Lakeland, Fl 33813
52358 5910 S. US #1, Fort Pierce SS South Fort Pierce LLC, 7931 W. Sandlake Rd.,#108,Orlando
58253 86 El Mar Dr., Jensen Beach Tradewind Homes, Inc., Kevin Arbour, 4380 SE Tall Pines Ave.
Stuart, Fl 3499
59109 5299 S. US #1, Fort Pierce Joseph J. Koch, (TR), 34230 Riviera Dr., Fraser, MI 48026
59110 5299 S. US #1, Fort Pierce Emmons Auto Broker, S/A
61919 151 Castana Ct., Port St. Lucie Tammy L. Gonzalez, S/A
61194 2701 Navajo Ave., Fort Pierce Gilberto Arbello, Jr., S/A
61564 2707 Ave. T, Fort Pierce Hearken Properties, LLC, PO Box 16515, Tampa, Fl
th
61483 3515 S. 7 St., Fort Pierce Joshua Perez, P.O. Box 245190, Pembroke Pines, Fl.
61552 922 S. Lake Dr., Fort Pierce Rohit & Ranjana Patel, 630 SW Palmetto Cove, Port St. Lucie
th
61555 3238 E. Lake Dr., Fort Pierce Jerry L. Smith, Sr., 401 S. 25 St., Fort Pierce
61729 806 N. Lake Dr., Fort Pierce LaSalle Bank, 2780 Lake Vista Dr., Lewisville, TX 75067
Attn: Property Preservation Dept.
61777 3241 W. Lake Dr. Fort Pierce National City Bank, 3232 Newark Dr., Miamisburg, OH 45342
Page 5 of 8
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD May 6, 2008
Attn: Property Preservation Dept.
61842 4901 Elm St., Fort Pierce EMC Mortgage Corp, 2780 Lake Vista Dr., Lewisville TX 75067
Attn: Property Preservation Dept.
th
61967 Parcel N. of 3120 Mara villa Blvd, James R. & Pamela S. Sullivan, 6040 SW 18 St.
Fort Pierce Plantation, Fl 33317
60689 709 Skylark Dr., Fort Pierce Countrywide Home Loans, 7105 Corporate Dr., MS PTX-C-3
Plano, TX, 75024, Attn: Armando Lopez
62009 709 Skylark Dr., Fort Pierce Countrywide Home Loans, 7105 Corporate Dr., MS PTX-C-3
Plano, TX, 75024, Attn: Armando Lopez
?
Mr. Williford made a motion in reference to the cases read into the record that the Code Enforcement
Board enter an Order of Finding against these violators finding the violators in default and if they do not
appear to contest the violations against them and that the Board adopt the recommendation of staff as
set forth on the agenda.
** Mr. Hofmann seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
H. FINE HEARING:
Case #60040, Location of Violation, 12035 S. Indian River Drive, Jensen Beach, Fl., Property Owner, Lianne
Lehrman, S/A. Ms. Lehrman was sworn in by Ms. Walls. This case was continued from the April 1, 2009
meeting.
Mr. Fowler provided nine photos dated 8/8/08 through 5/5/09. He reviewed the case first brought before the
12/08 CEB which found the property in violation of Section 13.00.01, Article 303.2 Roof repair, and Section
13.09.01, Article 303.2, remove mold and paint the exterior siding. The Board ordered the violations to be
corrected by 3/2/09, and at the CEB hearing of March 4, 2009 the Board continued the case to the CEB meeting
of April 1, 2009, as Ms. Lehrman thought the house was sold and a new owner would repair the roof. At the
4/1/09 CEB meeting the Board ordered staff to go out and inspect the roof and report their findings at today’s
hearing. Upon inspection staff determined that an unknown coating was applied to the asphalt shingles and is
uncertain whether this coating alone will be sufficient to abate the violation. Painting of the exterior siding also
needs to be performed.
Ms. Lehrman provided additional photos of the property showing before and after. The coating for the roof was
discussed. Ms. Lehrman said she paid for the roof repair, she was cited for debris around the property which she
has cleaned up and mold on the siding. The exterior was pressure cleaned, and the side of the house will be
painted, and she has moved into the property and expects to maintain it. The roof repair did not require a permit,
the coating was applied by a roofer as a sealer and she has a five year guarantee on it.
Mr. Lestrange said the coating has to meet standards, that staff will have to research it. That staff agrees the
repair is abated visually, but it is unknown if it satisfies Code.
The Board agreed that Ms. Lehrman has made progress and is trying to correct the violations. She agreed to
come into compliance by 6/5/09, and paint the siding, she will call staff to come out and inspect the coating. That
if all is done by June 5, 2009 the Board agreed that no fine would be levied. Mr. Fowler agreed it was going in the
right direction.
?
Ms. Monahan made a motion in reference to Case #60040, that the Code Enforcement Board make the
following determination: After hearing testimony, the facts in the case, the testimony and the report of
staff that the violation still exists, and after considering the gravity of the violation, the actions if any
taken by the violator to correct the violation and any previous violation, we make the following
determination: A fine of $100.00 per day shall be imposed for each day the violation exists, starting June
5, 2009 with the maximum fine not to exceed $10,000.00. A fine of $150 shall be imposed as the cost of
prosecuting the case.
Ms. Monahan noted the $100 per day fine was levied because of the work and effort Ms. Lehrman has
shown.
** Mr. Hofmann seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Lehrman confirmed the siding and the roof coating inspection were needed to be corrected.
Page 6 of 8
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD May 6, 2008
Case #56963, Location of Violation, 2405 Avienda Ave., Fort Pierce, Property Owner Bertha Jones, S/A. No one
was present to represent the property owner. Mr. Stickles noted that staff’s fine recommendation was corrected
from $250.00 to $100.00.
Mr. Brome provided four photos dated 6/27/08. This case was continued from the November 5, 2008 Code
Enforcement Board and found in violation of Section 11.05.01, obtain or renew permit #0501-1967 and final
inspection for the pitch roof and enclosure adding three walls to make two closets. A compliance date of 10/10/08
was issued. As of 5/6/09 the property is still in violation. No contact was made lately, the owner passed away and
the name change for ownership is ongoing.
?
Ms. Monahan made a motion in reference to Case #56963, that the Code Enforcement Board make the
following determination: After hearing testimony, the facts in the case, the testimony and the report of
staff that the violation still exists, and after considering the gravity of the violation, and the actions if any
taken by the violator to correct the violation and any previous violation, we make the following
determination: A fine of $100.00 per day shall be imposed for each day the violation exists, starting
October 11, 2008 with the maximum fine not to exceed $10,000.00. A fine of $125.00 shall be imposed as
the cost of prosecuting the case.
** Mr. Fogg seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
th
Case #52315, Location of Violation, 2212 N. 45 St., Fort Pierce, Property Owners, James & Jennifer Lloyd, 5715
Spruce Dr., Fort Pierce. No one was present to represent the property owners.
Mr. Brome provided one photo dated 10/22/07. This case was found in default at the 3/09 CEB meeting. The
property was found in violation of 11.05.01, please obtain a permit for enclosing the rear porch. A compliance
date of 4/3/09 was issued. As of 5/6/09 the property remains in violation.
?
Mr. Fogg made a motion in reference to Case #52315, that the Code Enforcement Board make the
following determination: After hearing testimony, the facts in the case, the testimony and the report of
staff that the violation still exists, and after considering the gravity of the violation, the actions if any
taken by the violator to correct the violation and any previous violation, we make the following
determination: A fine of $250.00 per day shall be imposed for each day the violation exists, starting April
4, 2009 with the maximum fine not to exceed $10,000.00. A fine of $125.00 shall be imposed as the cost of
prosecuting the case.
** Mr. Hofmann seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
Case #61016, Location of Violation, 3112 Avenue S, Fort Pierce, Property Owner John Manos, 1129 Mariposa
Ave., Coral Gables, Fl. 33146. No one was present to represent the property owner.
Ms. Swartzel provided four photos dated 10/27/08 through 5/5/09. During her first inspection on 10/27/08 the
property was found in violation of Section 13.09.00, Article 303.2, Protective treatment: repair or replace damaged
windows and damaged roof; and Section 13.04.00, obtain a permit and replace/repair exposed wires and
extension cord. A compliance date of 4/1/09 was issued. She has not had contact with the property owner. As of
5/4/09 the property remains in violation.
?
Mr. Fogg made a motion in reference to Case #61016, that the Code Enforcement Board make the
following determination: After hearing testimony, the facts in the case, the testimony and the report of
staff that the violation still exists, and after considering the gravity of the violation, the actions if any
taken by the violator to correct the violation and any previous violation, we make the following
determination: A fine of $250.00 per day shall be imposed for each day the violation exists, starting April
4, 2009 with the maximum fine not to exceed $10,000.00. A fine of $125.00 shall be imposed as the cost of
prosecuting the case.
** Mr. Hofmann seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
I. REPEAT VIOLATION- None
Page 7 of 8
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD May 6, 2008
J. FINE REDUCTION HEARING - None.
K. REHEARING OR RECONSIDERATION HEARING - None
L. OTHER BUSINESS - None
M. STAFF BUSINESS - None
N. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
ADJOURN:
There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 10:25 a.m.
_____________________________ ______________________
Phillip Stickles, Vice Chairman Date
_____________________________ _______________________
Mary F. Holleran, Specialist Consultant Date
Page 8 of 8