Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Meeting Minutes 07-17-2009 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA SPECIAL MEETING Date: July 17, 2009 Convened: 4:15 p.m Adjourned: 5:30 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairperson, Paula A. Lewis, Chazles Grande, Chris Dzadovsky, Chris Craft, Doug Cowazd Others Present: Faye Outlaw, County Administrator, Lee Ann Lowery, Asst. County Administrator, Christopher Steers, Asst. County Administrator, Heather Young, Asst. County Attorney, Marie Gouin, OMB/Purchasing Director, Millie Delgado-Feliciano, Deputy Clerk 1. INVOCATION 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Unagendad: Appointment of Mr. Matthes to the TCERA Boazd. The Chairperson addressed the a-mail received from Mr. Butch Terpening, Culpepper and Terpening in support of Mr. Matthes appointment. In his letter Mr. Terpening stated he wished for the Boazd to accept the a-mail as an officer of Culpepper and Terpening that his firm will be precluded from Professional Engineering Services during Mr. Matthes appointment if affirmed by the Board. It was moved by Com. Craft, seconded by Com. Cowazd, to appoint Mr. Matthes to the TCERA Board, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. HUMAN RESOURCES Consider staff recommendation to: Awazd of RFP # 09-029 Administrative Services Only for Self Funded Medical and Flexible Spending Account (FSA) Administration to Blue CrossBlue Shield, and permission for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. Mr. Jim Davis, EMI representative addressed the Boazd on this item and advised the Board of the bids received and his recommendation after the analysis was completed. He recommended the Administrative Services be handled by Blue Cross and Blue Shield and the renewal with Symetra. It was moved by Com. Grande, seconded by Com. Craft, to approve staff recommendation, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. REGULAR AGENDA 3. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Approval of proposed millage rates to be submitted to the Property Appraiser and set dates for public heazings. 1 Consider staff recommendation to approve the following: 1. Advise the Property Appraiser of the millage rates as outlined on "Worksheet Analysis of Roll-Back Millage Rate for fiscal year 2009-2010" under the column headed "2009-2010 proposed millage" 2. Set two public hearings on September 10~' and 22°d 2009 at 6:00 p.m. in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Commission Chambers 3. Authorize the County Administrator to be able to modify the millage rates between General Fund and Fine and Forfeiture Fund as long as the total countywide millage stays the same. Also, authorize the County Administrator to transmit the proposed millage rates to the Property Appraiser on Form DR-420, DR-420 C-P and DR-420 TIF. 4. Set the proposed aggregate millage as outlined on "Worksheet Analysis of Roll Back Millage Rate for fiscal year 2009-2010" under the column headed"009-2010 proposed millage". The proposed Maximum Total Countywide millage remains at 6.4612, or not increase from the current year, as directed by the Board. Mosquito Control has been included with countywide millages for purposes of this calculation. The proposed millage rate for the General Fund will be decreased, offset by an increase in the millage rate for the Fine & Forfeiture Fund. This change has not net affect on the countywide millage. The purpose for making this adjustment is to balance the Fine and Forfeiture Fund. All proposed millages in Street Lighting Districts have been increased except Sunrise Park (SLD # 7) and Southern Oaks Estates (SLD # 126). The purpose for making this adjustment is because property values have decreased, and the County is required to pay the lights bills based on the agreements. The total proposed aggregate millage has increased by .0422 mills over fiscal year 2008/2009. The decrease in roll back aggregate millage over current aggregate millage is -2.0239. This is due essentially to the decrease in certified value of 20.85%. The Management and Budget Director also addressed the Law Enforcement MSTU. She stated they needed to increase it to .3736, a .0225 mil increase; this is in order to cover the MSTU due to a decline in property values. This is a particular fund for the unincorporated area road patrol. Com. Craft stated the only choice they would have is to go back and change the agreements with the municipalities or ask the Sheriff to reduce his road patrol budget by the needed amount. The Management and Budget staff advised the Board the difference would be adding $164,000 to the Sheriff's road patrol budget to cover the Law Enforcement MSTU deficit. Com. Coward recommended possibly off setting the Law Enforcement MSTU and the Growth Management MSTU by that amount. The Growth Management Director advised the Board that given the market, the funds for the TVC can be utilized for this purpose since they would not be needed at this time. Com. Dzadovsky expressed his concern and stated the Sheriff should be made to cut more or Growth Management will lose out. 2 ' In speaking to the Sheriff's department Finance Director, he stated they did not have the ability to cut anywhere else in order to fund this shortage. It was the consensus of the Board to off set the MSTU's as recommended. It was moved by Com. Craft, seconded by Com. Grande, to approve staff recommendation, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of the Circuit Court 3