HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07-21-2007
1 St. Lucie County
2 Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency
rd
3 Commission Chambers, 3 Floor, Roger Poitras Annex
4 July 21, 2007 Regular Meeting
5 6:00 P.M.
6
7
A compact disc recording of this meeting, in its entirety, has been placed in the file along with these minutes as part of the record.
8
In the event of a conflict between the written minutes and the compact disc, the compact disc shall control.
9
10
CALL TO ORDER
11
12 Vice Chairman Caron called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.
13
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
14
15
ROLL CALL
16
17
18 Susan Caron .......................................Vice Chairman
19 Brad Culverhouse...............................Board Member
20 Pamela Hammer .................................Board Member
21 Stephanie Morgan ..............................Board Member
22 Craig Mundt .......................................Board Member
23 Barry Schrader ...................................Board Member
24
25 Members Absent:
26 William Hearn ....................................Chairman
27 John Knapp ........................................Board Member
28 Kathryn Hensley ................................Ex-Officio
29
OTHERS PRESENT
30
31
32 Faye Outlaw .......................................Assistant County Administrator
33 Robert Nix ..........................................Growth Management Department Director
34 Heather Young ...................................Assistant County Attorney III
35 Kristen Tetsworth...............................Planning Manager
36
ANNOUNCEMENTS
37
38 None.
39
DISCLOSURES
40
41 Vice Chairman Caron and Board Members Culverhouse, Hammer, Morgan and Mundt
42 disclosed that they had conversations with members of the public and staff on Ordinance
43 07-031 (n/k/a 07-044) and Grande Beach.
44
Item #1 Minutes
45
46 Review the minutes from the June 21, 2007 regular meeting for approval.
47
1
1 Ms. Hammer motioned approval of the minutes with the following changes: on page 2,
2 should be deleted; on page 23, line 3
3 spoke was Phil
4 Stickles.
5
6 Mr. Culverhouse expressed his concern with the fact that compact disc recordings of
7 these meetings are not made part of the public record. He expressed his concern with the
8 fact that these are summary minutes as opposed to verbatim minutes.
9
10 Ms. Morgan expressed her concern with the fact that these minutes are only a summary
11 and appear to have missing information especially with regards to the discussion that
12 took place on Ordinance No. 07-031 (which is now Ordinance No. 07-044).
13
14
15
16 language that will be included in the minutes stating that the compact disc recording of
17 these meetings will prevail if there is a discrepancy between the audio/video recording
18 and the typewritten minutes.
19
20 Mr. Culverhouse seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
21
22 Mr. that will probably move
23 faster than those before it, out of order (specifically the items under New Business).
24
25 There were discussions between Board members with reference to the above, but
26 ultimately Ms. Caron decided to move the three New Business items to the front of the
27 agenda.
28
Item #3: Sarbojben Patel CU 320071076
29
30 Petition of Sarbojben Patel for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the retail sale of liquor
31 in a CG (Commercial General) Zoning District for the property located in St. Lucie
32 County, Florida.
33
34 Ms. Kristen Tetsworth presented this item and advised that the Conditional Use Permit is
35 being requested for a property located on South Hutchinson Island approximately 0.75
36 miles north of Martin County. The proposed liquor store is located within a 1,600 sq. ft.
37 retail store in an existing 18,270 sq. ft. retail center. The liquor store was previously
38 operated approximately few blocks from the proposed site, but due to hurricane damage,
39 they relocated their business.
40
41 Ms. Hammer questioned the discrepancy in the name of the applicant which is noted on
42 page 2 of the resolution.
43
44 Ms. Tetsworth apologized for the error, and assured the Board that it will be corrected
45 before going to the Board of County Commissioners.
46
2
1 There were discussions between Board members and staff with regards to the hours of
2 operation.
3
4 Ms. Patel, the applicant, confirmed that the hours of operation will be 9 am until 8 pm
5 Monday through Saturday and 1 pm until 7 pm on Sunday.
6
7 Ms. Caron opened the public comment portion.
8
9 Adnan Aghita spoke and expressed his concern with the access easement he has and the
10 utility easement that was granted by the previous owner of the shopping center over his
11 access easement. He is neither opposed nor for the application being heard tonight, but
12 would like some type of remedy to this issue.
13
14 Ms. Young explained that she is familiar with the situation. With regards to the utility
15 easement, that was acquired by the County when they acquired the utilities from the
16 private utility company. There is an issue between Mr. Aghita and the owner of the
17 shopping plaza with the construction of a wall, but she will look into it further.
18
19 Mr. Aghita spoke again and questioned whether the utility easement is legal.
20
21 Ms. Caron assured Mr. Aghita that legal staff will look into these issues before this item
22 goes before the Board of County Commissioners.
23
24 There being no further public comment, Ms. Caron closed the public comment portion.
25
26 Mr. Mundt motioned to forward this application to the Board of County Commissioners
27 with a recommendation of approval.
28
29 Mr. Culverhouse seconded.
30
31 Ms. Hammer suggested an amendment to the motion which would include a resolution of
32 the issue brought up by Mr. Aghita.
33
34 Mr. Mundt agreed it should be a point of discussion, but it should not be an obstacle for
35 the approval of the application. Board members agreed.
36
37 Roll Call
38
39 Vice Chairman Caron yes
40 Mr. Culverhouse yes
41 Ms. Hammer yes
42 Ms. Morgan yes
43 Mr. Mundt yes
44 Mr. Schrader yes
45
46 The motion carried unanimously.
3
1
Item #4: Grande Beach Text Amendment Ordinance No. 07-032
2
3 An ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida,
4 amending Land Development Code Section 7.03.00, Planned Mixed Use Development;
5 amending Section 7.03.03 to modify the standards and requirements to allow greater than
6 40% residential development and modify the standards for horizontal and vertical
7 integration of uses, for a 9.44 acre parcel of land located at the northwest corner of State
8 Road A-1-A and Marina Drive on North Hutchinson Island in St. Lucie County, to
9 implement the development project and related Comprehensive Plan Amendment known
10
11 severability; providing an effective date; providing for codification; and providing for
12 applicability.
13
14 Kristen Tetsworth presented this item and explained that this is an application from
15 Grande Beach North Hutchinson Island, LLC, whose Comprehensive Plan Amendment
16 was approved on March 27, 2007. This application would enable them to supersede the
17 restriction of the 40% residential in a PMUD.
18
19 Bobbi Klein, Esq., on behalf of the applicant, complimented staff on their help and work
20 on this item.
21
22 The public comment portion was opened. No one from the public spoke and the public
23 comment portion was closed.
24
25 Ms. Hammer clarified that this application allows more than 40% residential units in a
26 mixed-use development. Ms. Tetsworth confirmed (although for future developments, it
27 would be on a project-by-project basis).
28
29 Mr. Mundt motioned to forward this item to the Board of County Commissioners (the
30
31
32 Mr. Schrader seconded.
33
34 Roll Call
35
36 Ms. Morgan - yes
37 Ms. Hammer - no because it was already approved from commercial to mixed-use and
38 they should not be allowed to increase density and she is opposed to approving something
39 that is beneficial to one property only.
40 Mr. Culverhouse - yes
41 Mr. Schrader - yes
42 Mr. Mundt - yes
43 Vice Chairman Caron yes
44
45 The motion carried 5-1 with Ms. Hammer dissenting.
46
4
Item #5: Grande Beach PMUD 06-002
1
2 A resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida
3 granting preliminary Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) site plan approval for
4 the project to be known as Grande Beach-PMUD; providing for determinations;
5 providing for approval subject to conditions; providing for applicability to the described
6 affected property; providing for expiration; providing for additional permitting; providing
7 for enforcement of conditions; and providing for a record file location; providing for
8 conflicts; providing for severability; and providing for an effective date.
9
10 Kristen Tetsworth presented this item and explained that staff is recommending approval
11 of the project. It will contain 70 residential units and 16,930 sq. ft. of commercial uses
12 on a 9.44-acre site located on Hutchinson Island.
13
14 Bobbi Klein, Esq., representing the applicant, addressed the Board and thanked staff,
15 again, for their hard work on this project.
16
17 Michael Houston, Houston Cuozzo Group, representing the applicant, addressed the
18 Board and displayed a large site plan of the proposed project. He also distributed copies
19 of site plan photos for Board members.
20
21 Ms. Caron opened the public comment portion. The following members of the public
22 spoke in favor of the proposed application
23 what was originally submitted; and both developer and residents in the area worked
24 together to reach an amicable agreement): Diane Andrews, Bill Medina, Michael
25 Riordin, Karl Williams, and Joan Miller.
26
27 The public comment portion was closed.
28
29 fact that the site plan depicts
30 nces in
31 place to ensure items like that are addressed.
32
33 Ms. Hammer also questioned whether or not salt tolerant plants will be used for
34 landscaping. Although Mr. Klein could not confirm, he assured Board members that the
35 appropriate members of the team will ensure that be done.
36
37 Mr. Mundt thanked the developer for the modifications that were made and for working
38 with the residents in that area. Ms. Caron expressed her thanks to the developer also.
39
40 Ms. Morgan motioned to forward this application to the Board of County Commissioners
41 with a recommendation of approval.
42
43 Mr. Mundt seconded.
44
45
5
1 Roll Call
2
3 Mr. Schrader yes
4 Ms. Hammer no because of the high density, because there are still errors on the site
5 plan, and because the landscape plan still does not match County Code.
6 Mr. Culverhouse yes
7 Mr. Mundt yes
8 Ms. Morgan - yes
9 Vice Chairman Caron yes
10
11 The motion carried 5-1 with Ms. Hammer dissenting.
12
Item #2-A: Ordinance No. 07-019 Environmental, Open Space and Recreational
13
Level of Service Standards and Provisions for Impact Fees
14
15 An ordinance of St. Lucie County, Florida, amending the St. Lucie County
16 Comprehensive Plan by adopting amendments to the Recreation and Open Space
17 Element of the Comprehensive Plan relating to desired outdoor recreation standards
18 (Table 9-
19 providing for conflicting provisions; providing for severability; providing for
20 applicability; providing for filing with the Department of State; providing for transmittal
21 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs; and providing for an effective date; and
22 providing for adoption.
23
24 Vanessa Bessey, Environmental Resources Director, presented this item and explained
25 that this ordinance is coming about as a result of direction from the Board of County
26 Commissioners who directed staff to work to establish an adopted level of service for
27 passive recreation areas in the County. Staff has been working with Dr. James Nicholas
28 to accomplish this task.
29
30 Staff is recommending that this Board forward this ordinance on to the Board of County
31 Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
32
33 Mr. Culverhouse had discussions with staff and Dr. Nicholas with reference to the
34 number of acres of community parks in the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County.
35
36 Dr. James Nicholas introduced himself to the Board and confirmed that the County meets
37 the level of service, currently, County-wide and he also confirmed that, currently, the
38 County provides more than 1200 acres of park space. The future level of service is the
39 issue that brought about this Ordinance. There were discussions of parks within the
40 unincorporated County and the number of residents/population contained within the City
41 of Port St. Lucie, etc.
42
43 Mr. Mundt questioned Exhibit A, Table 9-
44
45 all those facilities are listed under the Classification System.
46
6
1 Ms. Hammer questioned if a limitation of the type of boating would be included in the
2 passive outdoor recreation section. Ms. Bessey confirmed that it would be electric
3 motors only and that language will be added.
4
5 Ms. Caron opened the public comment portion and the following members of the public
6 spoke in opposition for reasons such as: it needs additional work and research and should
7 be brought back under the EAR-based amendments, an additional impact fee will make
8 housing even more unaffordable, and whether or not this is a requirement of the TVC
9 area.:
10
11 Jonathan Ferguson, Esq., Ron Heiman, Dennis Murphy and Tom Babcock.
12
13 There being no further public comment, the public comment portion was closed.
14
15 Dr. Nicholas explained that the Board of County Commissioners charged staff and
16 himself to come up with a program that would maintain the level of service of
17 environmental lands. Ultimately, the Board of County Commissioners decides the level
18 of service. He went on to explain that the impact fee would be applied to any lands that
19 are either acquired or voluntarily deemed as part of the environmentally sensitive lands
20 program. He also explained that maintenance and care expenses will be a detailed topic
21 as this issue moves forward.
22
23 Ms. Caron questioned whether or not this would apply to the TVC area. Ms. Bessey
24 explained that in order for it not to apply to the TVC, they would have to be exempted
25 and at the present time there have been no discussions in that regard. Dr. Nicholas
26 suggested that an exemption be done by ordinance rather than be included in the
27 Comprehensive Plan.
28
29 Mr. Culverhouse questioned what the proposed impact fee would be. Dr. Nicholas
30 explained that it would be approximately $680.00 on a single-family home.
31
32 Ms. Morgan expressed her concern that she feels more work needs to be done and does
33 not feel this is ready to go forward.
34
35
36 County Commissioners, but this would be a tool that would allow the County to set aside
37 funds needed for future acquisitions and if changes need to be done at a later date, it can
38 be amended.
39
40
41 before it is entered into the Comprehensive Plan instead of adopting something that will
42 need to be changed at a later date.
43
44 Ms. Hammer motioned to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that they
45 transmit Ordinance 07-019 with the following conditions: (1) that Table 9-6 include the
46 in column two; (2) on page 6 boating be identified as electric motors only;
7
1 (3) on page 8, Policy 9.1.1.1 include the wording Community Parks: 5 acres per 1000
2 population in the unincorporated areas; and (4) that the TVC be exempted.
3
4 Mr. Mundt seconded with an additional caveat that Table 9-6 be changed to accurately
5 reflect the Classification System.
6
7 Ms. Hammer agreed.
8
9 Roll Call
10
11 Ms. Morgan no
12 Mr. Culverhouse no
13 Mr. Schrader no
14 Mr. Mundt yes
15 Ms. Hammer yes
16 Vice Chairman Caron yes
17
18 Motion failed 3-3.
19
20 The Board took a break at 8:35 p.m. and reconvened at 8:49 p.m.
21
Item # 2-B Ordinance No. 07-044 Agricultural Planned Unit Development Open
22
Space Policies and Policy Regarding Transfer of Density from One Parcel of Land
23
to Another
24
25 An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida,
26 amending the text of the adopted Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Element by
27 amending Policies 1.1.2.2 and 1.1.2.3 to prohibit yards on development sites from being
28 included as part of the required 80% or 50% total open space in Agricultural 5 and
29 Agricultural 2.5 Planned Unit Developments, and allowing the Board of County
30 Commissioners to develop Land Development Regulations that permit the reduction of
31 the 80% or 50% total open space requirement in return for the provision of preservation,
32 conservation, or other agricultural, environmental, or passive recreational benefits, or by
33 providing additional common open space and by adding a new Policy 1.1.4.5 that
34 prohibits transferring density to a parcel of land from which density has been previously
35 transferred, and providing an exception; providing findings; providing for applicability;
36 providing for filing with the Florida Department of State; providing for transmittal to the
37 Department of Community Affairs; providing for conflicts; providing for severability;
38 and providing an effective date.
39
40 Mr. Nix presented this item and explained that this ordinance started out as a very small
41 part of Ordinance 07-031. The issues contained in this ordinance are the issues which the
42 Board of County Commissioners directed staff to work on and bring forward.
43
44 Mr. Nix discussed the issue of yards being included in open space on future
45 developments and developments that were approved in the past.
46
8
1 Mr. Nix also discussed the goals and policies of this ordinance.
2
3 Ms. Morgan questioned the advertising requirement with reference to these amendments.
4
5 Ms Young explained that, legally, one advertisement is all that is required. Ms. Young
6 confirmed that this amendment has been legally advertised. They included the other
7 advertising dates in an attempt to avoid confusion.
8
9 Ms. Morgan expressed her concern that this ordinance was advertised previously, under a
10 different number and on a holiday weekend. She feels that there may be a large number
11 of people who are unaware of this ordinance because of the change in number.
12
13 Ms. Morgan also questioned the steering committee that was to be set up with reference
14 to the issues brought about by this ordinance. She questioned whether or not it had been
15 formed and if they had met yet.
16
17 Mr. Nix explained that the steering committee is being set up to work with County staff
18 to provide assistance on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report process. They will assist
19 with public input. To date, 13 people have expressed an interest in participating in this
20 steering committee.
21
22 Ms. Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator, addressed the Board and explained
23 had discussions with the Board of County
24 Commissioners and determined what components of Ordinance 07-031 they wanted
25 moved forward at this time. Ms. Outlaw further explained that she consulted with the
26
27 indefinitely, they would be able to bring it back to this Board
28
29
30 that would be moved forward (which were included in previous Ordinance No. 07-044).
31
32 Board members discussed, at length, whether or not to proceed tonight or continue this
33 item to a special meeting in August because of the confusion that may have been created
34 by the difference in the ordinance numbers. After the discussion, it was agreed to move
35 forward tonight.
36
37 Ms. Caron opened the public comment portion. The following members of the public
38 spoke:
39
40 Jonathan Ferguson, Esq., representing Edwards Properties, spoke in opposition to this
41 proposed ordinance because he feels it should be part of EAR-based amendments that the
42 County will be going through soon. He feels these are material changes in policy.
43
44 Charlie Wilson, representing The St. Lucie Association, spoke in opposition to the
45 proposed ordinance because of what this may cost the taxpayer. The County could be
46 spending thousands, under the Burt Harris Amendment, reimbursing property owners.
9
1
2 Diane Andrews spoke and distributed to the Board, suggested revisions to Policy 1.1.1.5.
3 Ms. An
4 transfer of density.
5
6 The following members of the public spoke in opposition stating such reasons as fear of
7 properties being devalued, the confusion of the ordinance numbers and participating in
8 the committee that is to be formed with reference to these issues: Doug (did not get last
9 name), Rene Artalia (sp?), President of the St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce,
10 Sandra Couch, Ron Weaver, Esq., Joseph Miller, Mark Perry, Roland Yee (sp?), Biff
11 Craine (Mr. Craine also distributed copies of a letter he sent to the Growth Management
12 Department in opposition), George (did not get last name), Skeet Jernigen, Bobbi Klein,
13 Toby Overdorf, Tom Babcock, and William Eeley.
14
15 Ms. Caron also invited Mr. Dennis Murphy (and any other people in the audience) who
16 wish to weigh in on this issue.
17
18 Mr. Dennis Murphy addressed the Board and gave a lengthy overview of the intentions of
19 staff at the time this ordinance was written. Mr. Murphy explained that after lengthy
20 u
21 was first written it was decided that the majority of land west of the Turnpike was to have
22 densities of one unit per five acres. The Comp Plan Map was ultimately sent to
23 Tallahassee but was returned with some comments. The Board of County
24 Commissioners, at that time, addressed some of those comments but not all. It was
25 decided that the County would not change the density on lands west of the Turnpike.
26 However, it was decided that when development applications came in for that area, they
27 would be required to do a PUD.
28 agricultural type lands, the County decided to implement a policy that would, for
29 development of eight lots or less, not require a PUD. If you went above eight lots you
30 would have to do a PUD. The County was in contact with DCA during the entire process
31 of policy change and they had no problem with this new policy. Mr. Murphy stated that
32 staff, at the time, felt this policy worked. Mr. Murphy stated that he feels it still works.
33 There is no definition of terms in the current Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, there is no
34 definition of open space. Staff came up with the 80% over-all, 35% common with the
35 remainder being either common or open space with the intention being that every piece of
36 property would be different. It was never intended to have 80% common open space in
37 the agricultural area.
38
39 There being no further discussion, Ms. Caron closed the public comment portion of
40 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle 2007-02.
41
42 postpone
43 this item indefinitely and refer it to the advisory committee for further study.
44
45 Ms. Morgan seconded.
46
10
1 earlier comment that this Board had three
2 choices: (1) to pass it along with approval; (2) to pass it on with a recommendation of
3 denial; or (3) to withdraw it and continue it to the next cycle. Ms. Morgan requested
4 clarification of whether or not this is correct. She does not want to delay any of the other
5 amendments, but feels this one needs to be withdrawn.
6
7 Ms. Young said should would like to see the Attorney General Section Mr. Ferguson
8 referenced with regards to the above comment. Ms. Young went on to advise that staff is
9 ready to continue this item to a special meeting on August 2. Ms. Young went on to
10 explain that if it is the intention of this Board to have this item withdrawn, it should be
11 forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with that recommendation.
12
13 There were discussions on whether or not to withdraw this item or recommend that it not
14 be transmitted.
15
16 Mr. Culverhouse withdrew his previous motion.
17
18 Mr. Culverhouse then motioned that the Planning & Zoning Commission/Land Planning
19 Agency recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that Ordinance No. 07-044
20 not be transmitted to the DCA.
21
22 There were discussions of whether or not this would withdraw this item.
23
24 Ms. Hammer stated that she could agree to that motion because there does appear to be
25 two versions of an amendment out there and that she feels yards were not to be included
26 in the calculation of open space.
27
28 Then Mr. Culverhouse withdrew that motion and motioned that the Planning & Zoning
29 Commission/Land Planning Agency withdraw 07-044.
30
31 Ms. Morgan seconded.
32
33 Mr. Mundt questioned staff on some of this confusion among Board members.
34
35 Ms. Young explained that the County Attorney himself reviewed Ordinance No. 07-031,
36 but she is not sure if he reviewed Ordinance No. 07-044. With regard to the motion to
37 withdraw, preferably it should be a recommendation to the Board of County
38 Commissioners that it be withdrawn, but that can be left to the motion maker.
39
40 Mr. Nix then discussed, at length, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle, the
41 timeframes associated, and the duties of the Planning & Zoning Commission/Local
42 Planning Agency
43
44 Ms. Caron requested that Ms. Young give clear direction as to how the Board should
45 proceed tonight.
46
11
1 Ms. Young then explained that her recommendation to the Board would be that they
2 recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that they transmit it, transmit it with
3 changes, that it not be transmitted, or that it be withdrawn from the cycle (although
4 recommending that it not be transmitted, in essence, has the same affect as being
5 withdrawn).
6
7 Ms. Morgan then withdrew her second and Mr. Culverhouse then withdrew his motion.
8
9 Mr. Schrader motioned to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners not
10 transmit this ordinance, but rather that this ordinance , along with 07-031 be forwarded to
11 the steering committee that is being set up, and that it should be considered in the EAR
12 process.
13
14 Mr. Culverhouse seconded.
15
16 Roll Call
17
18 Mr. Mundt no
19 Ms. Morgan yes (and Ms. Morgan suggests that this not be transmitted and that it be
20 withdrawn completely and that staff needs to start all over again)
21 Ms. Hammer yes
22 Mr. Culverhouse yes
23 Mr. Schrader yes
24 Vice Chairman Caron yes
25
26 Motion carried 5-1 with Mr. Mundt dissenting.
27
28 Ms. Young then advised the Board that a motion is needed
29 recommendations on all the items in this plan amendment cycle to the Board of County
30 Commissioners.
31
32 Ms. Schrader motioned to forward all previous recommendations to the Board of County
33 Commissioners on this plan amendment cycle.
34
35 Ms. Morgan seconded.
36
37 Roll Call
38
39 Mr. Mundt yes
40 Ms. Hammer yes
41 Mr. Culverhouse yes
42 Ms. Morgan yes
43 Mr. Schrader yes
44 Vice Chairman Caron yes
45
46 The motion carried unanimously.
12
1
OTHER BUSINESS
2
3
4 Mr. Nix addressed the Board and explained that the Board of County Commissioners
5 would like amendments to Land Development Regulations Chapters 10, 11 and 12
6 moved along. Mr. Nix inquired whether this Board would like another workshop before
7 a hearing is scheduled. Board consensus was that another workshop is needed. Mr. Nix
8 stated that he would get with the consultants to work out the scheduling.
9
10 ming to
11 them shortly.
12
13 Mr. Nix asked the Board how they felt about special meetings on these items or having
14 one at a time on an agenda. Board consensus was to try having one on an agenda at a
15 time.
16
17 Bobbi Klein, Esq., representing The Provences DRI, addressed the Board briefly and
18 discussed the scheduling of this application. They are looking at changing the
19 Development Order and changing the density (reducing the density). Therefore, the item
20
21
22 Dennis Murphy, representing Capron Lakes, discussed scheduling with the Treasure
23 Coast Regional Planning Council and will need to figure out the timing before it comes
24 back to this Board. Mr. Murphy explained that the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
25 Council will not be meeting in August which is presenting these scheduling conflicts.
26
27 Mr. Klein advised that for his development he would like to stick to October and this
28 requires a vote.
29
30 Heather Young agreed.
31
32 Ms. Young advised the Board that a motion is needed to continue The Provences DRI to
33 October 18 (at 6:00 pm or as soon thereafter as can be heard)
34
35 Ms. Morgan motioned; Mr. Schrader seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
36
37 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:26 a.m.
13