Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 08-15-2002Secretary
i
St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency
Regular Meeting
Commission Chambers, 3rd Floor Roger Poitras Annex
August 15, 2002
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER:
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
C. Announcements
D. Disclosures
AGENDA ITEM 1: MEETING MINUTES —.Tune 20, 2002
Action Recommended. Approval
Exhibit #1: Minutes of June 20, 2002, meeting
AGENDA ITEM 2: GLASSMAN HOLDINGS. INC. — FILE NO. RZ-02-013
This is the petition of GLASSMAN HOLDINGS, INC., for a Change in Zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1
du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. Hank Flores will present Staff
comments.
Action Recommended: Forward Recommendation to County Commission
Exhibit #2: Staff Report and Site Location Maps
AGENDA ITEM 3: CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY — FILE NO. R7,02-014
This is the petition of CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, for a Change in Zoning from
the RS-3 (Residential, Single -Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning -District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. Hank
Flores will present Staff comments.
Action Recommended: Forward Recommendation to County Commission
Exhibit #3: Staff Report and Site Location Maps
r
--)AGENDA ITEM 4: TIMOTHY AND DEBRA ROSE CAR WASH — FILE NO. CU-02-001
This is the petition of TIMOTHY AND DEBRA ROSE CAR WASH, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the
operation of a car wash facility in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. Cyndi Snay will present
Staff comments.
Action Recommended. Forward Recommendation to County Commission
Exhibit #4: Staff Report, Site Plan and Site Location Maps
AGENDA ITEM 5: FLORIDA CENTER FOR RECOVERY, INC. — FILE NO. CU-02-007
This is the petition of FLORIDA CENTER FOR RECOVERY, INC., for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Social
Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. Hank Flores will present Staff comments.
Action Recommended: Forward Recommendation to County Commission
Exhibit #S: Staff Report and Site Location Maps
Page 1
r
St. Lucie County Planning arid -Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency
Regular Meeting - August 15, 2002, 7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM 6: WYNNE RANCH — FILE NO. RZ-02-015
This is the petition of WYNNE RANCH, for a Change in Zoning from the AG-5 (Agricultural - 1 du/5 acres) Zoning
d
District to the U (Utilities) Zoning District. Cyndi Snay will present Staff Comments.
Action Recommended: Forward Recommendation to County Commission
Exhibit #6: Staff Report and Site Location Maps
AGENDA ITEM 7: WYNNE RANCH — FILE NO. CU-02-008
This is the petition of WYNNE RANCH, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of an Air Curtain
Incinerator in the U (Utilities) Zoning District. Cyndi Snay will present Staff Comments.
Action Recommended. Forward Recommendation to County Commission
Exhibit #7. Staff Report and Site Location Maps
AGENDA ITEM 8: ORDINANCE 02-020 — Amend the Land Development Code to provide for clarification
`''on Enforcement Proceedings
This ordinance is to amend the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for clarification on
Enforcement Proceedings for Violations of Section 7.10.12©, land clearing and yard trash recycling operations.
Dennis Murphy will present Staff Comments.
Action Recommended: Forward Recommendation to County Commission
Exhibit #8: Staff Report and Site Location Maps
OTHER BUSINESS•
A. Other business at Commission Members' discretion.
B. There will be a Special Planning and Zoning Commission / Local Planning Agency Meeting on
Thursday August 29, 2002, 7:00 P.M or as soon thereafter as possible in the Commission Chambers
at the Roger Poitras Annex Building.
C. Next regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting will be held on September 19, 2002, in
Commission Chambers at the Roger Poitras Annex Building.
ADJOURN
NOTICE: All proceedings before the Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency of St. Lucie
County, Florida, are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and
Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he
will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to insure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Upon the
request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the
proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County
Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (772)
462-1428.
Any questions about this agenda may be referred to the St. Lucie County Planning Division at (772) 462-1586.
Page 2
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT
Planning Division
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission/
Local Planning Agency Members
FROM: Dawn Gilmore, Administrative Secretary
DATE: Thursday, August 15, 2002
SUBJECT. P&ZAttendance
Mr. Russell Akins and Mr. Fred Jones will not be attending this evenings P&Z
meeting. Their absences are with notice.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 7/18/02
File Number PA-02-003 and RZ-02-008
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Manager
DATE: June 24, 2002
SUBJECT: Application of T & T Land, Ltd., for a Future Land Use Designation
Modification from the RU (Residential Urban) Future Land Use designation to
the IND (Industrial) Future Land Use designation.
On February 25, 2002, the applicant submitted a petition for Change in Land Use for property
located east of Kings Highway, approximately 2500 feet south of Angle Road. This petition was
scheduled for the April 18, 2002 public hearing.
On April 16, 2002, the applicant's representative requested a continuance until May 16, 2002.
On May 8, 2002, the applicant's representative requested a continuance until July 18, 2002.
On June 24, 2002 the Community Development Department received an additional request from the
applicant for a continuance from the July 18, 2002 public hearing to the September 19, 2002
Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency public hearing. Due to the time which has
passed since the initial advertised publication, staff will readvertise the proposed item.
FORM 813 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY MUNICIPAL AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME —FIRST NAME —MIDDLE NAME E OF BOgRO, COUNCIL. COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
l�atthes, Stefan . Lucie County Planning apd.Zoning. CaTp ss:
MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD, COUNCIL, M SSIO , AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
2980 S. 25th Street WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
CITY COUNTY
+ O CITY X COUNTY O OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
St. Lucie Count
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED tM
Y POSITION IS:
Tune 20, 2002 e ELECTIVE 1X APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 813
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which.
inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law,
mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
mintitac of the meeting- who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side)
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council.
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective Or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WiTH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting an a measure which
inures to his or her special private gain or toss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or toss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies.under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a ane-acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a'relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter,. husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -taw,
mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A 'business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner. Joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not -fisted on any national or regional stock exchange).
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and firing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However. you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WiLL BE
TAKEN:
.M rnmt tr, influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
0
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
• A opy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
• You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
1 Stefan Matthes , hereby disclose that on _ June 20, 2002
(a) A measure came orwill come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative,
X inured to the special gain or loss of employer who does engineering work for Petitioner ' by
whom I am retained; or
inured to the special gain or loss of which
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The'measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting_ interest in the measure is as follows:
AGENDA ITEM 5 z ' 'EAST 'FLORIDA PPIMITIVE 'BAPTTST-'DISTRICT :ASSOCIATION: 'INC: '".TILE .-NO.—CU-02"O(
This is the petition of EAST FLORIDA PRD ITIVE BAPTIST DISTRICT ASSOCIATION, INC., for the
Conditional Use Permit to allow educational services and facilities in the I (Institutional)
Zoning District.
2 � ZOO
Date Filed . .
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the or(her members of the agency.
The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form Is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. !
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
1, CarSnn McnirCly hereby disclose that on June 20 , 20 02
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative,
JL inured to the special gain or loss 19 bU aek l Dq fi n_arx� n frrm . �r a-e _ ' by
wham I am retained: or
Inured to the special gain or loss of which
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
AGE,'NAA ITEM ' 3 c ' 't3RDINANCE 'N0: 02=003 ._ •Extension 'of 'the 'Urban 'Service -Bourdary= 'Lin -Indrio, .
Iric. Continued ran May 15, 2002, Mee .. Ms is ' Fxti:tZOri Of LIN nWIO, INC.
PHMICIAN COUNTRY CUM for an Or nance extiandi.ng the Urbstt>< Service Boundary of the St. Lucie
County Qmprehensive Plan.
Date Filed
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
C'ONSTf?UTES GROUNDS FOR AN0 MAY. BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REOUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10.000.
CE FORM 88 • EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2
WHO MUST FILE FORM 813
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council.
commission, authority, or'committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason. please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the fort
INSTRUCTIONS FOR C6MPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive cInty, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by wham he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
183.35T, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes M this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law,
mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law, A 'business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict-
PRiOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting: and
WiTHiN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEirTiNG AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL 8E
TAKEN:
enmolete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
. _,._.......... ,.,e, a;Aal
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
The form must be read publicly at the next meeting alter the form is riled.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT 13Y DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
• You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
- You must complete the form and rite it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the torm in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. !
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I, Darwin McCurdy , hereby disclose that on June 20, 2082
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
— inured to my special private gain or loss;
inured to the special gain or toss of my business associate,
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative,
x inured to the special gain or loss.ot J:U. sawki nq fi nanCj ng f)= mcr ewl cyex by
whom I am retained; or
inured to the special gain or loss of which
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
AGI M ILK ' 2 c —0RD7 WKZ 'NO: ' 02=002 — 'Future'land 'Use 'Chart Liza ' indrio ' inc. Continued
fr Wm May 16, 2001, Mee g. MS is the petition of LIN ZDRIO, INC. ICIAN COUNTRY
CLUB for an Ordinance granting a Change in Futu a Land Use Designation froth RE (Residential
Estate) to RU (Residential Urban).
If
Date Filed
NOTICE: UNDER PAOVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES'GROUNOS FOR AND* MAY 6E' 0bNISHEO BY ONE OR MORE OF tkE FOLLOWING" IlNAPEACHMENT.
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 88 - EFF. 1r2000
PAGE 2
St. Lucie County
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes�`i_s
REGULAR MEETING
June 20, 2002
Commission Chambers, 3rd Floor, Roger Poitras Annex
7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Mr. Grande, Mr. Lounds, Mr. Jones, Mr. Akins, Mr. Merritt, Mr. Hearn, Mr. McCurdy, Mr.
Matthes. (�` �1 0-6 �— a % _/
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Mr. Jones (Absent - With Notice)
OTHERS PRESENT:
Mr. David Kelly, Planning Manager; Mr. Hank Flores, Planner III; Ms. Cyndi Snay, Planner III;
Ms. Heather Young, Asst. Co. Attorney; Ms. Dawn Gilmore, Administrative Secretary.
P & Z Meeting
,June 20, 2002
Page 1
psi L a 4�'ll t,l�.
5 ; '
CALL TO ORDER;-
Chairman Matthes called to order the meeting of the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning
Commission at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mr. Merritt disclosed that the petitioner in Agenda Item's # 2 & #3 purchased the property
through his company last year. He stated that he does plan to vote on the item because he
doesn't see any conflict of interest, as long as no one has any objections.
Mr. McCurdy stated that the petitioner in Agenda Item's #2 & #3 has requested potential
financing from his employer and therefore, under the advice of counsel, he would recuse himself
from both items.
Chairman Matthes stated that his employer was involved with the project in Agenda Item # 5 and
would recuse himself from that item.
Chairman Matthes gave a brief presentation on the procedures and what to expect for tonight's
meeting. For those of you who have not been here before, The Planning and Zoning Commission
is an agency that makes recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. The Staff will
present a brief summary of the project and then make their recommendation. After which time,
the Petitioner will be asked to come forward and state his/her case for the requested petition. At
any time the Commission may stop and ask questions of the Petitioner or Staff. After that
process is completed the Chairman will open the public hearing for anyone who wishes to speak
for or against the petition. The purpose behind this hearing is to get input from the general
public. If anyone has something to say, please feel free to come forward and state it. After
everyone has gotten a chance to speak the Chairman will then close the public hearing. The
Commission will deliberate and then make a decision regarding their recommendation, one way
or the other. The decision that is made is typically read from a scripted set of statements that are
given to the Commission. It may sound rehearsed but it really is not. There is one motion for
and one motion against in the package, so that the Commission can make a motion either one
way or the other so it is very clear in the records.
Once again, I want to remind you that the Planning and Zoning Commission only acts in an
advisory capacity for the Board of County Commissioners. If you are not happy with the outcome
of this hearing you will have the opportunity to speak at the public hearing in front of the Board
of County Commissioners.
No other announcements or comments.
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 2
AGENDA ITEM 1: May 16, 2002 MEETING MINUTES: . ` 9 U
Mr. Lounds moved for approval. Motion seconded by Mr. McCurdy.
Mr. Grande stated that on Page 12 and Page 14 under the discussion regarding Gulfstream's gas
pipeline there was one condition added and he stated he believed there were two conditions
added. He advised that he would like Staff to review the tape to see if they voted for a second
condition, which was that there would be no tanks above ground for storing gas. He stated that if
that is part of the motion on the tape, it should be added to the minutes and if it wasn't on the
tape, then he may be incorrect. Mr. Kelly stated that Staff will review the tape again but that he
had spoken with the Secretary and it is reflected in the discussion of the minutes and she believed
that the wording of "completely underground" covered the issue and that was all that was in the
motion. Mr. Kelly stated they would review it again to be sure and if there were a second
condition, the minutes would be changed to reflect that.
Note: Upon review of the tape, the minutes were not changed.
Upon a roll call vote, the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 8-0).
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 3
s , �
71
AGENDAITEM2: ORDINANCE NO.02-003 — Extension of the Urban Service Boundary:
Mr. Kelly explained Agenda Items # 2 & 3 were both the petitions of Lin Indrio, Inc. He also
stated that they were listed on the original agenda in the wrong order because the Urban Service
Boundary Line would have to be moved before the Future Land Use Change could be done. He
also stated that since these two items are from the same petitioner and are closely related, they
would be presented together.
Mr. Kelly stated that Staff provided the Commission with a report, which did not include
additional data that the applicant has since provided. He stated that the information has been
provided to them tonight to review and his presentation would include some of that information.
He advised that the first issue is the extension of the Urban Service Boundary. He stated that the
current Urban Service Boundary comes down Emerson and makes a small jog at Indrio and then
picks up again out in an area for the interchange. He also stated that there is a gap in the Urban
Service Boundary in that area. He advised that tonight's petition is requesting that the Urban
Service Boundary be extended eastward from the interchange and goes north as well to include
the applicant's property, but the parcel is not large enough to close the entire gap. He stated that
if the Urban Service Boundary were to be expanded the second part of the petition is for a change
in Future Land Use from RE (Residential Estate) to RU (Residential Urban). He continued that
at the time the Staff report was prepared there were a number of outstanding questions/issues
from the applicant. Staff provided the applicant these questions. Since, the distribution of the
staff memo the applicant has submitted a response to these questions, which were provided to the
Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency tonight and really answered pretty
much all of their questions.
Mr. Kelly stated that the applicant supporting documentation demonstrated that if the County
wishes to move the Urban Service Boundary or expand the amount of land in the general area of
Indrio that is within the Urban Service Boundary and increase densities from going from RE to
RU, the change probably would not impact any of the required services in a negative manner. He
continued that the real question is if this is an appropriate change to the Urban Service Boundary
and should the County make a positive change to expand that area. He stated that they are in an
odd position for several reasons. He advised that during the time of the Comprehensive Plan
hearings he recommended that the County close the existing gap in the Urban Service Boundary
because it didn't make any real sense to have that gap in the Urban Service Boundary. He stated
that he made those same statements to the County Commission and made the same
recommendation and they decided they did not want to do that at that time and instead wanted to
take a comprehensive look at the Urban Service Boundary in that area and also in the Gatlin,
Okeechobee Road areas and various other areas too. He advised that the Board of County
Commissioners funded in the budget to hire somebody to look at those issues and Staff went out
with an RFP and received seven proposals. He stated the proposals have been reviewed and the
committee has short listed three. On July 23`d, the Board of County Commissioners will hear
proposals from the three top candidates and may then choose one of the three to look at the issue
of the Urban Service Boundary, north to south, within the County over the next year.
Mr. Kelly stated that there are two issues with this application be processed at this time. The
first issue is that there is no real demonstrated need to modify the Urban Service Boundary at this
time. The second issue that the County is moving forward with the Urban Service Boundary
Study. Further, there is an additional more pressing issue and that is the Department of
Community Affairs has responded to our Comprehensive Plan and has indicated they are going
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 4
' ,a`L
to find us to -be not in compliance. He stated ftt DCA has identified four primary issues with
the Comprehensive Plan: they are, with the Conservation Element, Capital Improvements
Element, Transportation Element and the Future Land Use Element. The DCA has indicated that
the County isn't doing enough to protect lands outside of the Urban Service Boundary. He
advised the County might need to take sixty to ninety days, maybe even a little longer, in order to
solve the outstanding DCA issues. He also stated they are trying to set a meeting with DCA in
Tallahassee for hopefully next week to identify what the County will need to do to enter into a
Stipulated Settlement Agreement on the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that the reason that is
important tonight is that the County may not be able to process Future Land Use changes on the
Land Use Map for State review until we are found to be incompliance. He stated that once this
issue gets to the County Commission, he doesn't believe they will be in a position where they
can transmit it to the State because the other issues would not have been solved yet. He advised
there are several things going on, all involving the Urban Service Boundary, this application, the
study on Urban Service Boundaries, and the State telling us that we are clearly not doing enough
to protect the lands outside of the Urban Service Boundary.
Mr. Kelly stated that the proposed application demonstrates additional need, Countywide, in the
long term, but in this section of the County, he thinks that there is not a need for additional units
and land until 2010. He also stated there is the study, which hopefully will help Staff, the Local
Planning Agency and the County Commission, to make determinations about what should be
done with the Urban Service Line as a whole and lastly the issues with the State and the inability
to send it to the State at this time. He stated that Staff recommends that they hear from the
applicant this evening and Staff will answer any questions they can with regards to the
application, but they find their selves in an odd situation given all of the things that are occurring.
Mr. Matthes asked if there were any questions from the Board for staff at this time.
Mr. Akins stated that it sounds to him like the timing is a bit premature. Mr. Kelly stated that he
felt it might be premature on potentially two fronts. He questioned if it is premature with regards
to the overall need of the County to begin to put housing out there and if it is premature to
consider this ahead of the Urban Service Boundary Study. Mr. Akins asked if it was premature
to consider it tonight when the County Commission cannot transmit it at this time anyway. Mr.
Akins stated that there is a problem with the Comprehensive Plan regarding approval by the
DCA and that problem relates to concerns over the County's ability to protect lands outside of
the Urban Service Boundary. He questioned if this would further exacerbate the problem since
we are seeking to expand the Urban Service Boundary rather than protect those lands outside of
it. Mr. Kelly stated that if someone were to review this only from an office in Tallahassee, not
knowing much about St. Lucie County, he probably would. He continued that from an office in
the Planning Department in St. Lucie County, he thinks in some time period, the area from Kings
Highway to the interstate along Indrio Road is clearly in an area that is going to become a part of
the Urban Service Area. He stated that out to the interstate he thinks they are going to see
growth and doesn't feel this is an unreasonable request, but that the timing is the issue. He
advised that he believes that what the State is really looking for is the protection of the lands
located in the far western two-thirds of the County. He stated that in the long run, the areas
easterly of the Interstate will eventually be incorporated within the Urban Service Area.
Chairman Matthes requested a show of hands from the public to identify who attended the
meeting to speak for or against these petitions, other than the petitioners. Only one person raised
their hand. He stated that they have tabled these petitions many times and put the general public
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 5
out and that they need to hear what the public has to say. Mr. Kelly stated that the applic
been working on this issue and the public has been here and he believed that it was appropriate
after all that has been done to get the petitions on an agenda, to let them know what the issues
were even if the County Commission ultimately cannot go forward it was time for it to be heard
tonight. Chairman Matthes stated that he has a hard time acting, right now, on something that he
knows DCA will think poorly of the overall decision making process. He also stated that he feels
they need to hear the applicant and the public on these issues.
Mr. Lounds stated that from what he can see there is an Urban Service Area that is virtually an
island. Mr. Kelly confirmed that was correct and there was actually a second one out on Orange
Avenue. Mr. Lounds asked if the area connected anywhere with a current Urban Service Area
and Mr. Kelly confirmed that it did not.
Mr. Hearn questioned why the Urban Service Boundary was extended around the interchange
and requested the history and significance of it. Mr. Kelly stated that it had to do with the uses
around the interchange. The intent was to provide the services central to the interchange,
possibly with package plants and to deal with it in that manner. He advised that it wasn't
appropriate at the time the Comprehensive Plan was drawn up to identify all of that area as
Urban Service Area but they did want to make the interchange available. Mr. Hearn questioned
how those land owners around I-95 uses would be affected if that Urban Service Boundary was
not out there. Mr. Kelly stated that they would need Comprehensive Plan Land Use amendments
prior to approving any interchange type of uses.
Mr. Lounds questioned if the petitioner is asking to extend a boundary around their piece of
property without connecting it to the Emerson Avenue boundary area. Mr. Kelly confirmed that
was correct and that the petitioner does not own the other piece of land to request that it be
included.
Mr. Hearn asked if Staff had any record of the amount of traffic accidents on Johnson and Indrio
Road regarding the side railing out there. He continued that he has heard stories through
homeowners meetings that the railing usually gets knocked down each month. Mr. Kelly stated
he did not have that information available with him at the moment.
Mr. Matthes asked if the applicant was present and would he come forward and make his
presentation.
Mr. Richard Sneed stated he is an attorney in Fort Pierce and represents the applicant, Lin Indrio,
Inc. He stated that Lin Indrio, Inc. is a Florida Corporation and the principle of which is Lloyd
Moody, who is in the audience. He continued that Mr. Moody has a home in Singer Island and
also in Houston, Texas. He stated that their engineer Earl Masteller, of Masteller & Moler in
Vero Beach was present, as well as Mr. Mark Matthes and Mr. Greg Boggs who are land
planners with Lucido & Associates. He advised that this project started back in August 2001 and
that he has had several discussions with Mr. Kelly and Mr. Murphy since that time. He stated
that they had spent a lot of money -based on discussions with Staff and have submitted thousands
of dollars worth of documentation in seeking these approvals. He also stated that their plans are
far beyond the cartoon plans that are occasionally brought in by applicants requesting a change in
zoning or to move lines and to do things in the community. He continued that his client is
committed to building a first class golf course community on the property that he has purchased
on Johnston Road and Indrio Road in our community. He stated that ironically there is a-
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 6
C.:, 3
floating out in never-never land and a gap between his property and another property between the
Urban Service lines that seems to be a mysterious area that cannot be addressed this evening
because of an opinion of Staff. He advised that they are here this evening to prove the contrary
and to support their position and to answer every question that Staff has raised in opposition to
their applications. He stated that they have submitted complete plans for the golf course design
and engineering to County Staff and also offered into record those submittals. He stated that
specifically they have submitted one original complete planned development application, a check
for $4040, fifteen copies of the site plan graphics and other related plans, ten copies of the
required boundary and topographical survey, four copies of an environmental impact report, four
copies of landscaping plans, as well as one original vegetation removal application and required
survey's and photo's in conjunction with that application. He also stated that they have
submitted a. preliminary drainage data plan, a traffic report and all of this was submitted in
October 2001 to the County Staff. He continued that they have hired a traffic engineer,
landscape architect, golf course architect, engineering firm, environmental audit firm and an
environmental audit was submitted to the County Staff. He advised that they have hired a soil -
boring firm who conducted soil -boring tests on the property and a firm that provided a storm
water drainage system plans and designs for the property.
Mr. Sneed stated that they would like the Commission to consider this application. He continued
that they have heard from a gentleman who he respects as a land planner, but not as a legal
person and has given the Commission a legal opinion about something that is not legally correct.
He advised that he stood before the Commission and stated categorically that they shouldn't
consider their position and that the County Commissioners could not approve their applications
is not founded in law, whatsoever. He suggested that they discuss that information with the
County Attorney because County Staffs statement concerning that is just baseless. He stated
that they are here. to support their position in that regard and are confident that they can support
each of the comments of County Staff concerning the application. He requested that the
Commission take a look at their comments and listen to his planners and their responses.
Mr. Grande asked that Mr. Sneed speak into the microphone to be on the record and Mr. Sneed
stated that he has his own recorder who is taking it all down. Chairman Matthes stated that he
would prefer that he speak into the microphone and Mr. Sneed complied. Mr. Sneed asked if the
Chairman would place on record if he were going to consider the application that is before him.
Chairman Matthes stated that was a decision that would be made by the Commission as a whole
after the presentation. Mr. Sneed stated that he thought that Chairman Matthes had said that he
wasn't going to do that. Chairman Matthes stated that he did not say that he would not do that
and that what he said was that he had concerns with taking any action if it would be against
something that DCA has told the County that they are not properly doing. Mr. Sneed stated that
it is his point about relying on a County Staff planner about what the law is with regard to DCA
and it seems as if it has prejudiced his client in it's presentation here tonight. He continued that
they have come a long way to get here and that the last time they were supposed to be here they
couldn't come because the publication was in error. Chairman Matthes stated that is why the
Commission decided to hear their petition this evening as opposed to delaying it any further. Mr.
Sneed stated that it seemed from the prejudicial atmosphere and tone that they are now faced
with, concerning this application, is not the type of public hearing or the process that they
thought they were going to be involved in here tonight. He advised that they thought they were
going to come before the Commission and present their responses to County Staff. Chairman
Matthes stated that he did not think that they had any prejudicial thoughts at the Commission
with respect to his plan. He continued that their concerns are with respect to what DCA had to
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 7
L±; :�.' i1 caste
'Ua
e�
N' .1
say and that they are there to listen to him tonight and to make a decision in their capacity. Mr.
Sneed asked Chairman Matthes if he knew of anything specifically that DCA said that he could
share with them this evening and Chairman Matthes stated he did not. Mr. Sneed questioned if it
is his understanding that they are simply relying on what Mr. Murphy had stated DCA's position
is. Chairman Matthes pointed out that the staff person who made the report was Mr. Kelly, not
Mr. Murphy. Mr. Sneed continued to refer to Mr. Kelly as Mr. Murphy. For clarity, Mr. Kelly's
name has been inserted in parentheses after Mr. Murphy's each time this occurred.
Chairman Matthes stated that he is relying on what Mr. Kelly stated with respect to making a
decision. Mr. Sneed confirmed that the Commission's decision would be based on Mr. Murphy's
(Mr. Kelly) representation as to what DCA said. Chairman Matthes stated that the whole
Commission's decision would be based on the merits of what is presented.
Mr. Akins stated that maybe the representative from the County Attorney's office should clear up
that one point. Ms. Young stated that it is her understanding that the Board of County
Commissioners can take action on it and can send it to Tallahassee but that Tallahassee will not
accept or review it while this process relating to the Comprehensive Plan is ongoing. Mr. Sneed
stated that he would like it placed on the record that the process that counsel has referred to has
been ongoing since he has been a lawyer in the community and will continue to be ongoing
forever. He also stated that the EAR amendments that they are speaking of are amendments that
perhaps should have been made a long time ago and through a process of failing to do that, the
plan will have to be amended. He advised that isn't their fault and that was Staff and the
County's fault and from what he heard from counsel they can consider this unbiased without
prejudice to what went forward earlier in this meeting and was announced by Mr. Murphy (Mr.
Kelly) as to the DCA's position on it. He continued that they have cleared it up for him and that
they are not going to rely on Mr. Murphy's (Mr. Kelly's) statement of the laws with regards to
the DCA.
Mr. Hearn questioned Mr. Sneed if at the present time the zoning is the same as it was when his
client purchased the property; one unit per acre. Mr. Sneed stated that they have made no other
applications other than the ones before the Commission tonight. Mr. Hearn stated that is not
what he was asking and that he is asking if the zoning is the same today as it was when it was
purchased; one unit per acre. Mr. Sneed advised that is correct and they have not made any
applications other than the ones before them tonight. Mr. Hearn stated he wanted to confirm that
it is zoned for only one unit per acre currently and Mr. Sneed stated that if it were RE-1 when
they purchased it, then it would be RE-1 today. Mr. Hearn also asked if the County, at any time,
encouraged them to move forward with this project. Mr. Sneed confirmed that County Staff had
and that they would not have spent thousands of dollars but for those comments. Mr. Hearn
stated that it is very important for him, as a Commission member, to know if Staff encouraged
this project from the beginning. Mr. Sneed asked that Mr. Matthes be allowed to present his
information as long as it would not be an imposition. Chairman Matthes stated it would not be
an imposition and that would be part of the procedure.
Mr. Mark Matthes of Lucido & Associates stated he would like to make some comments on
behalf of their application tonight and to address the comments of Mr. Kelly and the Staff report
as well as his correspondence to them from June 50' and their response with the resubmitted
report of June 17" `. He continued that he would mostly be referencing their report and would be
glad to provide page numbers and so forth as he moves through the document. He continued that
he had an opportunity to review the Department of Community Affairs report regarding the EAR
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 8
7
AL
based amendments and would like to speak to that also as it relates to this plaw amram
DCA's position with regard to the EAR does and does not relate to their request before the
Commission tonight.
Mr. Matthes stated that he would like to first discuss the Urban Service area at 1-95 and the
interchange he has found through his experiences in planning that is a typical arrangement to
have a freestanding Urban Service area to accommodate this type of unique feature. He
continued that it is also commonplace to have transitioning from that type of urban development
to the more rural development that may surround it. He stated that this particular island of urban
service area does not necessarily have transitioning land uses before it and you basically end up
with a sea of urban area next to orange groves. He also stated that typically you have a
transitioning of land from higher intensities to the lower intensities as you move toward the
agricultural areas but as Mr. Kelly indicated this area more than likely will grow. That someday
it may all be together and that timing is an important issue. He continued that the sixty to ninety
day time period to potentially resolve the DCA objections and reports on the EAR based
amendments will more than likely be a bit longer and in addition to that, the one year study on
the urban service area itself is possibly going to be longer than a year especially with the very
comprehensive scope and tremendous amount of work that is before the consultant, which Staff
put together. He advised that once that study is done they'll have to go through Comprehensive
Plan amendments to make changes to the Urban Service Boundary before that study could be
implemented and those amendments themselves take about a year. He stated that if their
application is put on hold pending a result they are effectively shut out of any type of
development for the County for numerous years while this is worked out. He continued that
through his presentation he feels he can show the Commission this is not a premature
development proposal and land use application request.
Mr. Matthes stated that in terms of DCA's ORC report, it spoke to issues regarding protection of
the Urban Service area and also as Mr. Kelly had mentioned, DCA sitting in Tallahassee may be
more concerned about the vast majority of the two-thirds of the county west of 1-95 instead of the
pockets necessarily of state land uses that are inside and surrounding the current urban service
area for many reason. He continued that the first reason is that 2010 is the planning time frame
that currently supports the housing and population needs analysis of the Comprehensive Plan is
not a long-term estimate. He stated that all those numbers based on 2010 are really talking about
a short-term horizon and their analysis shows there is already a deficit of land for residential
needs in the short-term horizon and will only get worse in the long-term. He advised that timing
is very important and these projects cannot go online in a day and if they were given a supportive
recommendation tonight through the Commission it would be about six to nine months before
this land use could be affected and before they could even begin to get an approved PUD. He
also stated that the development of this site would be phased over three to five years as they
phase the houses in and construct the golf courses and would not be fully in place until about
2007 or 2008. He continued that clearly the timing is appropriate for this project.
Mr. Matthes stated that in response to Mr. Kelly's June 50, request for additional information,
they have answered all of their questions and that this development will not impact urban
services to the degrading point and in fact through their contributions of impact facts and
developers agreements and additional ad velorum taxes would more than likely benefit the
county in many ways. He continued that they have provided clearly two analyses within their
staff report beginning on page 9 of the June 17th revised report. He stated that of the two
analyses that they performed one was on a countywide level based upon data directly out of the
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 9
Comprehensive Plan and eldarly shows a deficit of residential land through and by 2010 FIe
continued that at Staff s request in their June 5 h letter they went on to do a sub area analysis of
the north county area, which is generally defined by the canal just south of Indrio Road and just
south of the airport to the north county line from I-95 to the intercostals waterway. He advised
that they had received data from St. Lucie County Staff, including the property appraisers data of
development status. They did a detailed analysis of the use of the residential land within this
area and determined it's vacant status and number of units. He stated that they clearly show,
using data and assumptions within the Comprehensive Plan and other government approved
documents, such as the 2025 long-range transportation plan that prior to 2015 there will be a
deficit of residential land within the north county area. He advised that deficit is clear within the
long-range planning time frame and as you move forward in those planning activities you try to
address these deficits before they get to a short-term horizon because time is needed to respond
to these needs. He stated that they feel in the north county area it is an appropriate time to act.
He advised that Staff made recommendations at prior discussions of the Comprehensive Plan and
the need to close that gap and they are one parcel that is willing to step forward and rnove
forward with that concept.
Mr. Matthes stated that the second point was there seemed to be a discrepancy between their
analyses regarding the numbers they used of four units per acre as an average development
density for a single-family housing project and their development, which is approximately 1.6
units per acre. He advised that is clearly resolved by the nature of their development and single
family urban development is consistent with the other urban developments within the urban
service area. He stated that the golf course, which will be open to the public for use and will be a.
benefit to the community. He stated the third request being an analysis of the uses in and around
the site, they did provide that analysis and primarily that area is an undeveloped in urban uses
because it is currently outside of the Urban Service Boundary. He continued that the I-95
interchange is also undeveloped in urban uses because currently urban utilities do not exist there.
He advised that to their east less than a half -mile you begin to get into urban type development
and you begin to get into the eastern urban service area, which again is shown to be having a
deficit of residential land. He stated that Staff requested a more thorough traffic analysis, which
they had provided as part of the PUD but did not supplement the land use amendment with a
comprehensive long-term report so they did as requested. He advised they used the typical
methodology of a comprehensive plan analysis with generalized capacity tables from the DOT
and analyzed the impact of their development on area roadways and it clearly shows, from a
generalized prospective, the links that will be impacted are adequate to accommodate that
impact.
Mr. Matthes stated the fifth request for information was regarding police, fire and schools was
addressed. He advised that the response they got most often when they contacted everyone was
that they had never been asked for that before and they needed time to get back to them with a;
response. He stated that the fire department stated their development is within their service area.
and would be served in a better time than the average service area simply because of it's close
location to the fire station. He continued that they acknowledged that they would need to do
more specific personnel analysis as part of the development application. He stated that
unfortunately he had not received responses from the police department or the school district.
He advised that the police department told him that they would be glad to provide that
information as a part of the development application and since this isn't that application they
were not able to respond to their request. He also stated that the school district just was not able
to get the information to them in time and therefore he couldn't provide that information but that
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 10
TO y �9
they did acknowledge that indeed through their impact fees they use that method to plan for the
capital needs of their facilities.
Mr. Matthes advised that the sixth request was for an additional analysis of recreational
amenities. He stated there are specific requirements within the Comprehensive Plan, which they
feel they meet all of, that you cannot create by expansion of the urban service area a deficit in
mandatory facilities. He also stated that there is already a deficit in community parks in St.
Lucie County at this time but that deficit is not caused by this project and you could argue that
their development would make it worse, however, they could argue that their payment of impact
fees contributes to the resolution of the deficit. He advised that Lakewood Park is in that area
and a proportional analysis of the 7.3 acres of that park to determine it's service area and it's
service population and those numbers are in the report and could accommodate the existing units
and also for the vacant land within their service area and would still have extra capacity. He
stated this demonstrates that even though the county may have a countywide deficit in
community parks, the north county area does not currently within the service area of Lakewood
Park. He continued that the recreational analysis is on page 18 of their staff report. They added
an analysis of agricultural vacant lands and viability because there is a statement within the
Comprehensive Plan that says expansion within the urban service area is not supposed to degrade
the ability of other lands outside of the urban service area from continuing to operate with
agricultural purposes. He stated that the development of their site in no way would impose any
conditions or restrictions on neighboring properties from being able to be used for agricultural
purposes. He also stated that one of the Staff's memos indicated the availability of utility
services to be from 2010 to 2015. He advised that they have obtained copies of the Master Plan
from the Utilities Department and provided excerpts of their maps and tables within their report,
which clearly shows that a main line will be extended to the I-95 interchange area within 2005 to
serve that urban area. He stated there would be utilities available by the time they need them and
they fully meet" the timing of that requirement also. He also stated that this is a smart, timely
planning task to bring this property in now instead of waiting two years and coming to the same
conclusion at that time because the utilities, parks, fire and everything are in place. He stated
that in his opinion this is entirely consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in all aspects.
Mr. Matthes stated that the DCA's analysis of protecting the Urban Service Boundary as it
relates to utilities was related to the ambiguous language of policies that would allow
development of an urban nature without utilities and that was their main objection. He also
stated that in his review of the ORC report was that they did not think we were protecting the
urban service area enough because the policies that required urban services was not strict enough
to be only within the urban service area. He advised that their plan is not going against that
because they will have urban facilities of all natures and he doesn't believe DCA would have any
basis to reject on that nature.
Mr. Trias stated that the applicant had mentioned several times that they had prepared a site -plan
and wanted to know if they had it tonight and could show the members. Mr. Matthes distributed
copies of the site -plan to each member for their review.
Chairman Matthes stated that Mr. Matthes had mentioned that urban service utilities would be
available by 2005 and that he referenced the county's master plan but Chairman Matthes
questioned if that date was based on a cost feasible plan or just based on a master plan which
desires to provide services by that date. Mr. Matthes stated that he could not answer that
question because he personally did not review the program.
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 11
u��y il"61 L-
sai4 'J C "sS 7p(p¢
Mr. Earl Masteller, of Masteller & Moler stated they are the engineers on the project. He stated
they have been working on this project from the beginning and are familiar with the water and
sewer situation. He advised that they are under continuing contact with the County Utilities
Department and understands that Mr. Blazak wants to get the water and sewer extended out
Indrio Road. He stated as far as the funding of those lines, they are both sized to be twelve inch
and this project would basically pay for those lines out to it in the form of impact fees. He
advised that several months ago the utilities department contracted with a consultant to do a
study of the north county area with regards to sewer and water for that area. He stated that study
is moving forward and it is ironic that there is conflict within the county where an Urban Service
Boundary that is not permitting projects to be developed that are going to be served by a sewer
system that is now being sized in the study to serve. He continued that there is money being
spent on this study and that the sewers are going to be put out in the north county area and the
Urban Service Boundary will have to be adjusted to accommodate the development to make the
sewer viable.
Mr. Lloyd Moody stated he was the developer and it was his intention to create a project that
would be a credit to St. Lucie County as well as himself. He also stated that Mr. Murphy and
Mr. Kelly have been very cooperative with them over the period of time they have been working
with them and they have enjoyed it.
Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Jeff Furst, Property Appraiser for St. Lucie County stated he has had the pleasure of dealing
with the real estate business in St. Lucie County since 1970 and can say that in that time he has
only met a few visionary developers who have both the means and the vision to do something
outstanding. Mr. Johnson from Lakeport, Mr. Thomas White from the Peacock Ranch and the
Duda's. He advised that the State had told everyone that when they created that interchange that
they didn't have to give those landowners very much money because their property would
become so valuable because of the development within the near future that would increase their
property values by the development of that road. He stated that they called the interchange a
prime location and then showed all the development that would spread from the interstate all the
way east to the Indian River. He advised that they were correct because if you ride that corridor
starting at Gatlin and come up to St. Lucie West, Okeechobee Road and Orange Avenue, other
than Indrio, that is what has happened. He stated that everyone has known for a long time that
everything east of I-95 will be developed in some form or fashion and that has been the history of
it. He said that if the Comprehensive Plan has lagged and if the Urban Service Boundary is not
where it should be today that doesn't mean we should have to hire a lot of people and wait a long
time to figure out what we know all over Florida, it is going to happen. He continued_ that his
dilemma as the Property Appraiser is being faced with an increasing amount of requests from the
State for recognition of properties that are no longer justifiable for agricultural purposes and to
remove the exemptions. He stated that they clearly recognize that most of the properties within
the corridors east of those interstates are unlikely to be agricultural in nature. It is very difficult
to justify a keeping a property for agricultural use. He advised that they are, in effect, telling us
that we really need to recognize what the land use and future plans are going to be, what the
values are, get the exemptions off and tax them. He stated it is exceedingly difficult when Staff
says there is no real urgency, but there is an urgency because there are members. of the
community that have gone bankrupt. He advised that he is faced with having to decide on
pulling their exemptions or not on the assumptions that something is going to be done out therF
other than agricultural. He also stated that if the County truly believes the areas should be
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 12
.m
d is`tirt
converted back to agricultural then they need to be able to have aerial: applicators out along that
corridor. He continued that he feels we cannot keep doing anything and something needs to be
decided one way or the other and he cannot keep extending exemptions when there is no
decision. He stated that from a valuing and exemption stand points they are in a dilemma and
this means large amounts of money to these people who own land out there and have no
alternatives. He stated that he feels there really needs to be a decision and he has no problem
either way but he needs to know for sure which way the County is going to go. He also stated
that this petitioner's situation is not as dire as many others that he has seen, but the lack of
decision of direction is causing havoc in those areas east of I-95.
Seeing no one else, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Akins asked Mr. Furst why are we doing a piecemeal consideration of the Urban Service
Boundary or are we getting into spot changing. Mr. Furst stated that he believes there was a real
problem when they first did the Comprehensive Plan because this county didn't understand that
at the rate it was developing they needed a central water and sewer system. He also stated that a
lot of the reason they had to piecemeal and do some of the things they did in the original
development was because there was no infrastructure or_a plan for one at the time. He advised
there is a fairly large sized development on the western side of I-95 and isn't sure how we got
there or if it made sense to do or not. He said that he is not submitting that tomorrow the urban
service district should be taken to I-95 the length of the County because there are clearly areas it
hasn't gotten to yet.
Mr.. Grande stated that philosophically he agreed with Mr. Furst but found that the focus needs to
be on this specific applicant and he thinks the applicant is saying that their engineers have a
better handle on when the county provided infrastructure is going to reach their area than the
County does. He stated that he has a problem with that and he thinks that the developer is saying
that their impact fees and the development of less than two units per acre is going to more than
pay for the infrastructure that they are going to require outside of the urban service area. He also
stated that he believes that the situations and problems that occurred in the past were because of
statements like that and that citizens who sat on these types of boards believed them because it
made sense in theory. He continued that there is a real danger here if they move faster than Staff
has requested because there are two alternatives. He stated they could either recognize the
problem and in a planned and controlled fashion move the Urban Service Boundary to where it
should be moved based on what they see coming in five or six years and prepare for it. He
advised that the other alternative would be to take the reports that they get and do them one at a
time and they don't get to finish the job of deciding where the boundary as a whole is. He said
this application should be reviewed, as a whole, based on where the County is now through its
Staff -and where they are planning to go within the next twelve months. He also stated that a
three, four or five month delay is not a game breaker and when you consider that the developer
understood that he was purchasing land outside of the Urban Service Boundary and chose to buy
it anyway. Mr. Furst stated that he has no difficulty with a decision being made within a time
certain. He continued that his concern is if two years from now there is still only discussion and
no finalized decision or plan.
Mr. Trias stated that the issue of the Urban Service Boundary has been discussed for quite a long
time throughout many counties and that St. Lucie County can review what they have done or
haven't done to help make decisions. He also stated that he believes that other counties would
agree that most of the area east of I-95 would develop and isn't anything new. He stated that the
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 13
w :4'� �, p
`c:tJ � �
question is how and what type of developments are we going to have and are the develbpifielits
going to enhance our tax base. He continued that he feels those are the issues that we should be
discussing and he would prefer not to talk about so many technical issues of the DCA and it is
more important to discuss whether or not this type of development is what is best for the
community. He stated that he would like to ask Mr. Furst if he believes residential projects pay
for themselves. Mr. Furst stated that he believes that in this county it usually takes a home cost
of about $107,000 to pay for itself in the community.
Mr. Merritt asked what the tax rate was in comparison to Martin and Indian River County. Mr.
Furst stated that Indian River County's unincorporated area millage rate is higher than St. Lucie
County. He also stated that St. Lucie County's rolls are rising better than the other counties in
relation to the need and thinks the millage rate will be very close.
Mr. Lounds stated there is a very large golf course on this project and questioned if there is any
rule of thumb that the appraisers office uses with regards to the value of that type of community.
Mr. Furst stated that developers use golf courses as a draw and the draw usually is that they can
get more money for a smaller piece of property and put a bigger house on it than they could
without the golf course. He advised that in most cases golf course properties are generally more
valuable. He stated that may not be true in every case, but he could not think of any case in this
county. He also stated that they are not put in because they provide a public service, it is
generally because it's good economics. Mr. Lounds asked if when figuring the value of the
property in this project, would they figure the golf course as proportionate to each lot or separate
the two. Mr. Furst stated it would enhance the value of all of the lots. He continued that he feels
the County really needs to take a direction one way or the other because these types of problems
have been going on for too long.
Mr. Hearn stated that this project is in the part of the county where he lives and he would like to
see a project of this nature built in that area. He also stated that it could set a precedent for future
development but he has two problems with it. He advised that the first problem is that there
would be homes adjacent to agricultural land and if the property owner to the west decides to put
in a hog farm this could cause major problems for those living in the development. He stated that
the second problem is Indrio Road and how narrow it is and the amount of traffic on it. He also
stated that the intersection of Johnson and Indrio Road has been the scene of many accidents and
if this development is approved, there needs to be improvements made to that intersection.
Chairman Matthes stated that he agrees with Mr. Hearn but believes that would be something to
consider and review later in the process, not at this time. Mr. Hearn advised that issue would
tend to make him vote against the project. Chairman Matthes stated that he didn't believe they
could condition an Urban Service Boundary change or a Future Land Use Change. Ms. Young
stated that was correct because they are not conditional issues. Mr. Mark Matthes stated that
they did do traffic reports with their PUD and it specifically identifies numerous off site
intersection modifications to address both safety and capacity issues. He continued that these
issues are all address within the traffic report and would be the responsibility of the applicant.
He also stated that he agrees with the Chairman and that information would be submitted with
their PUD request.
Mr. Trias asked Mr. Matthes if he believed this type of a development with one entrance and a
large cul-de-sac as a general form of development in that area will cause any traffic problems.
Mr. Mark Matthes stated there are two entrances but generally speaking that this type of plan
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 14
` { r ,, y. �,4.
would funnel all the traffic to roadways like Indrio and Johnson and probably would I. 'bs•tli r` � � i
most desirable method. He continued that he believes in the many small roads concept because
they usually have slower speeds and better safety records and so forth. He also stated that not all
developments will be the same and cannot expect to have a typical pattern. Mr. Trias asked Mr.
Matthes if the plan they presented is the best plan and layout they could come up with. Mr. Mark
Matthes stated that he is not a golf course designer and wouldn't feel comfortable answering that
question. He also stated that they are not here to speak about the PUD today and would rather
just discuss the Urban Service Boundary issues.
Mr. Grande stated the project is moving along and if this request was not approved on the basis
of Staff s indication then greater questions need to be answered which will not stop them from
moving forward. He continued that there is still a lot for them to do before they would have to
come to a halt because of the County. Mr. Mark Matthes stated that he disagrees and they have
already submitted a complete PUD application that the County is waiting to review until these
issues are resolved. He also stated that they could time the approval of the PUD so that it could
be heard very soon after a potential approval of the land use amendment. He advised that he
feels they are in a holding pattern right now and until they know if their request is moving
forward they don't want to spend any more money on the project. He continued. that there are
also some potential fallbacks and their development is only 1.6 units per acre, which is less than
the two units per acre requirement. He stated that they want and require urban facilities for this
development and according to the Comprehensive Plan urban service area development must be
two units per acre and higher. He also stated that since they are less than two units per acre, they
could move forward, without the expansion of the Urban Service Boundary with an approval of a
Residential Suburban land use classification. He advised. that would not change their plan at all
and they would do it under Residential Suburban land use classification instead of Residential
Urban because it would avoid the discussion of moving the primary Urban Service Boundary.
He stated that their support for Residential Urban is easily translatable to a.Residential Suburban
request. He also stated that if they find that they cannot move forward with their request for
Residential Urban and the change in Urban Service Boundary they do have the fallback of
requesting Residential Suburban land use.
Mr. Lounds asked why they hadn't already made the request already to change to Residential
Suburban seeing the problems that have occurred and Staff's recommendation. Mr. Mark
Matthes stated that they are offering that for discussion now. He also stated that they believe all
of their analysis to date will support a Residential Suburban classification but doesn't know why
they didn't request this before. He advised that they have been working with Staff for six months
and it never came across their minds until very recently.
Mr. Lounds asked Staff what the differences are between their original request for Residential
Urban and the change proposed of Residential Suburban. Mr. Kelly stated that Residential
Urban allows up to five dwelling units per acre and would take a change to the Urban Service
Boundary. He also stated that Residential Suburban is allowed outside of the Urban Service
Boundary and would allow up to two dwelling units per acre. Mr. Lounds asked Mr. Matthes if
they are proposing less than two dwelling units per acre. Mr. Matthes stated that their request
tonight is only about the Comprehensive Plan amendment and Urban Service Boundary change.
He advised that their PUD application has been submitted to the County that does have less than
two units per gross acre. Mr. Lounds questioned how many units per acre they were planning.
Mr. Mark Matthes stated that it is approximately 1.7 gross dwelling units per acre. He stated that
Residential Suburban allows PUD's on smaller lots however; the word suburban is expected to
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 15
R
��•Y!
;T
a _..
t
be for laYger lot suburban developments in a rural area. He advised that their reas"fii for
requesting Residential Urban is because their development is smaller and more urban than
suburban but due to the math and the design they come below the two units per acre. He stated
that had they came up with 2.1 units per acre, they would have been stuck at Urban even though
they are just slightly over the cap for Suburban.
Mr. Grande confirmed that they are asking for a change in the Urban Service Boundary but Staff
and their attorney are not in total agreement about if that should be done. He stated that they
have reached a point where they do know what they want to develop here and just demonstrated
that they don't need to affect the Urban Service Boundary to do that. He advised that the
Residential Suburban and PUD could all be done outside of the Urban Service Boundary and
would satisfy Staff s questions as of date without being bogged down with the timeliness of an
Urban Service Boundary change. He stated that he feels there is a pattern here and they are
reviewing the wrong application. Mr. Mark Matthes stated that the application for the site stands
as submitted but they would accept as a compromise a Residential Suburban recommendation to
keep this project moving forward. Mr. Grande stated he appreciates their willingness to do that
but on the other hand it would be easier to just reject the Urban Service Boundary change and
ask the applicant to come back with a zoning change and PUD at the same time. Mr. Mark
Matthes stated that unfortunately Residential Suburban is also a land use amendment and they
would not like to have to expose themselves to the time penalty of starting the Comprehensive
Plan amendment cycle all over again when this application could just be amended. He also
stated that the LPA and County Commission always have the right to approve something that is
less dense than requested. He stated that denial of the Urban Service Boundary would not have
any affect on a request for Residential Suburban land use classification. Mr. Grande stated if
they deny the Urban Service Boundary and review the second application for a change in future
land use as a Residential Suburban instead of Residential Urban. Mr. Matthes stated that they
would want to review with Staff and the County Attorney to understand their time penalty for the
EAR based amendment complication.
Mr. Merritt stated that if they remember when they reviewed the Comprehensive Plan he asked if
our Urban Service Boundary matched up with Indian River County and was told it did at the time
and it does not. He stated their Urban Service Boundary is from 43`d avenue (Johnson Road) and
allows three units per acre but our Urban Service Boundary swerves around like a snake. He also
stated that common sense should tell you that the Urban Service Boundary is going to move and
all they are doing by delaying this is costing the applicant more money.
Mr. Grande stated that he did not suggest delaying their applications in any way. He advised that
if they deny this request for a change to the Urban Service Boundary because they feel it is a spot
change request and then they approve the second application with a change to the land use they
are asking for, they would come back next with a PUD change request and plan. He stated that it
will take no more time and perhaps less time than approving the Urban Service Boundary change
and in no way would that be a time delay for them. Mr. Mark Matthes stated he does believe Mr.
Grande's statements are correct.
Mr. Trias stated that he suspects that part of the reason they were requesting the Urban Service
Boundary change is that a project of this magnitude is outside of the Urban Service Boundary it
could be challenged as being sprawl and could be a problem later on. Mr. Grande stated that he
views that from exactly the opposite perspective because the project should be able to stand on
its own merits and is too far out for the supporting services it probably should fail. Mr. Trias
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 16
f .... :i J
stated he would be more comfortable if Mr. Matthes, being a professional land plannet,"WAd'
explain why this wouldn't be considered sprawl in either of the two conditions. Mr. Mark
Matthes stated that they would need to look at the long-term vision of their request for
Residential Urban and the urban uses expand all the way to I-95 and then transition at that point
to the agricultural and rural areas. He also stated that the second vision could be that they create
a very nice mixed use node at 1-95, which is what the land use is, and from there transition out to
different uses. He advised that is what they may end up with around their area and in that gap in
the Urban Service Boundary is the suburban land uses, which separate the eastern urban uses
from the mixed -use node at 1-95. He continued that either of those visions are valid planning
visions but there is a different answer for each request. He advised that he thinks suburban is a
transition land use from urban.
Mr. Grande asked Mr. Moody if he would be willing to withdraw the application for the Urban
Service Boundary change and move forward with the second application tonight. Mr. Moody
stated he would not have a problem with that. He also stated that the regulation is not a 100%
clear on some things and the reason they requested the Urban Service Boundary change was that
they felt it was clearer what they would be able to do. He stated there were some questions about
extended sewers beyond the urban service line into an area where it isn't urban service. He
advised that there were also questions about the size of the lots. He stated even though they are
allowed two units per acre, what size does the lot have to be. Mr. Grande stated he believes that
their engineer answered the first question by telling them that he knew when the services would
be in their area. Mr. Moody stated that originally they thought the regulation read that the source
could not be extended beyond the Urban Service Boundary and they were not in that area so they
could not get sewers there. He also stated that they found out recently that it is probably possible
to extend the sewers even though it is not within the Urban Service Boundary. He advised that
Mr. Kelly might be able to confirm that information. Mr. Grande stated that he would like Mr.
Matthes to address the sewer issue since he stated earlier in their presentation that he knew all of
the specifics. Mr. Moody stated that the question is that even though they are going to be run out
there, do they need to change the Urban Service Boundary to run the sewers into that district
because they would have to go through a district that isn't within that area.
Mr. Lounds confirmed that they are being asked to make two decisions this evening. Chairman
Matthes confirmed that was correct. Mr. Lounds stated that he doesn't have a problem with the
project at all and that portion of the county needs this type of development and is a prime area to
help balance the developments in St. Lucie County. He also stated that it helps to develop the
utilities and services in an area that is truly going to move. He advised that his problem is not
with the development itself but with the motion to readjust the urban service line without due
cause from the study group that has been asked to do. He also stated that if they change their
request to Residential Suburban; he has no problem with that at all. Mr. Moody stated they
would change their request as suggested. Mr. Lounds stated that he believes that by 2005 these
issues should have been discussed and solved by then. He also stated that he feels Mr. Furst's
comments were right on target and this county has some important decisions to make that need to
be done quickly and precisely.
Mr. Kelly stated that he has spoken with Mr. Matthes and if they wish to move towards the
compromise that Mr. Grande had outlined, there is an alternate and safer way for the developer to
approach that. Mr. Kelly advised that staff wants to do some research about whether projects
outside of the Urban Service Boundary can have utilities and some various other items. He also
stated that he is recommending that they recommend denial of the Urban Service Boundary
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 17
p
: a t3 [A9t1;iVa�
ft
`a
Motion secGifded by Mr. Akins.
Upon a roll call vote the motion passed with a vote of 5-2 (with Mr. Merritt and Mr.
Lounds voting against) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of denial.
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 19
;;aka' AI
change and to recommend instead appro ral of Residential Suburban. He stated that would ie` ve
the Urban Service Boundary change request on the table for the County Commission should they
find that there might be problems with getting utilities out into that area. He continued that if
they withdraw the application, they are done with the County Commission. Mr. Grande stated
that is exactly what he was considering. Mr. Matthes stated that they are in support of motions to
that nature.
Mr. Merritt stated that his reason for voting for this Urban Service Boundary change was to make
sure it went before the County Commission to get them to move because there are going to be
more requests like this in the future. He also stated that he feels the Commissioners idea of
spending $40,000 to do a study with regards to moving the Urban Service Boundary is not good
common sense. He advised that he wanted to send it forward with a recommendation of approval
to send a message to them.
Mr. Lounds stated that Mr. Merritt's request has a lot of merit and they need to be able to send
the Board of County Commissioners guidelines and some feeling from the Planning Commission,
as an advisory board, because they don't have the final vote. Mr. Grande stated that he feels the
Board of County Commissioners clearly needs to get the study and get moving on this.
Mr. Trias stated that he tends to agree with Mr. Merritt on this issue and thinks that the Urban
Service Boundary should be more reasonably defined in the future. He stated that he does
believe they need better land development guidelines and his objection is to layout of the
development. He advised that would affect what happens in the future and the trend that we are
setting. He stated that his recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners would be to
start looking at the design and development issues more seriously because otherwise we know
exactly what is going to happen.
Mr. Akins stated that he agrees and supports the project because he feels it is a quality project.
He continued that he doesn't know if what they decide tonight with regard to the Urban Service
Boundary is going to affect the fact that there is money that is going to be spent on the study. He
stated that he doesn't feel that if they take this action tonight it will save any money or cause any
other money to be spent on that study because that process is already ongoing. He advised that
he feels they need to address the issue here tonight.
Mr. Grande stated that he doesn't exactly agree with everything that Mr. Akins said, but wanted
to address Mr. Merritt's comments. He stated that Mr. Merritt's concern is taken care of by the
minutes detailing virtually everything that was heard here tonight. He advised that the
philosophies that have been stated in terms of the Urban Service Boundary question being moved
quickly will be reflected in the minutes and will be read by the Board of County Commissioners.
He stated to Mr. Trias that this would be two separate items and then his issues could be
discussed with the second application instead of now.
Mr. Grande stated after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing,
including Staff comments, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission/Local
Planning Agency of St. Lucie County recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of
County Commissioners deny the application of Lin Indrio Inc., for an amendment to the St.
Lucie County Comprehensive Plan to extend the Urban Service Boundary, because we have
found this evening that request is totally unnecessary and everything else will occur in the
next hearing on the subsequent application.
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 18
1 q.
AGENDA ITEM 3: ORDINANCE 02-002 — Future Land Use Chanze:
Mr. Kelly explained Agenda Items # 2 & 3 were both the petitions of Lin Indrio, Inc. He also
stated that they were listed on the original agenda in the wrong order because the Urban Service
Line would have to be moved before the Future Land Use Change could be done. He also stated
that since these two items are from the same petitioner and are closely related the presentation
for the previous item should be considered for this item.
Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing.
Seeing no one, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Hearn stated after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing,
including Staff comments, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission/Local
Planning Agency of St. Lucie County recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of
County Commissioners approve the application of Lin Indrio Inc., for a Change to the
Future Land Use Designation from RE (Residential Estate) to RS (Residential Suburban),
because it apparently is the best way to resolve the issue before us tonight.
Motion seconded by Mr. Grande, with further discussion.
Mr. Grande stated that he would like to get Mr. Trias' view on the application as a stand-alone
application. Mr. Trias stated that his comments would really be more appropriate for a PUD
review and right now they are only reviewing a land use change. He also stated that he feels this
is the fundamental problem with the process because they are dealing with everything in little
pieces and by the time they get to the end it is too late to look at the big picture. He advised that
sometimes when he makes comments that deal with planning and design people look at him like
he is not making sense. He stated that this type of development that has one big cul-de-sac going
out to one road is not a good way to develop based on their experiences with development in
counties that have done this. He also stated that in his view to do this type of development,
which is completely disjointed and doesn't have any planning scheme to deal with the big
picture, does not require review from Staff or any other review boards. He stated these types of
developments are going to happen because the market is enough to make many of these things
happen. He advised that the value that any of them may bring to the table is to try to put it all
together. He continued that right now there is no process that he knows of that asks for that
discussion to happen, which forces them to review each part of the project individually. He
advised that they do not deal with any kind of comprehensive vision for this area and until they
do projects like this will be all developed like this and having nothing left to do.
Mr. Grande questioned what Mr. Trias said and asked if the relationship between the land use
change and the PUD, which will follow, would the process be better served if the land use
change were being voted on at the same time with the PUD. Mr. Trias stated he does believe that
would be more helpful. Mr. Grande stated that had this been submitted without a request for an
Urban Service Boundary change but with the land use change and a PUD plan request, they
would be in a position to do the best job possible. Mr. Trias stated he agrees.
Mr. Grande asked Mr. Moody if it would be a problem for him to come back with the land use
change application at the same time as the PUD request, which from prior testimony sounds like
it is virtually ready. Mr. Moody stated it would be a major problem because they would have to
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 20
spend all that money up fremt without knowing if the land use change would be approv&&-i-'A�-`
continued that even though they have already done a lot of work, there is still a lot more expenses
that have to be spent to finalize the plans for the PUD. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Moody if he
would feel more comfortable waiting to spend that money if they had the Residential Suburban
land use change already approved. Mr. Moody confirmed that was correct.
Mr. Merritt asked that everyone use their common sense.
Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 7-0) and forwarded to
the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
P & Z Meeting
June 20,2002
Page 21
A t
11A
AGENDA ITEM 4: EMILIO MARTINEZ - FILE NO. RZ-02-012:
Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 4 was the application of
Emilio Martinez for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning
District to the CO (Commercial, Office) Zoning District for 1.08 acres of property located on the
East side of the Turnpike Feeder Road, approximately 300 feet north of Palomar Parkway. He
continued that the stated purpose for the rezoning is to develop the property into a dental office.
He also stated that the surrounding zoning is CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) to the South,
north, and west with RM-5 (Residential, Multiple -Family — 5 du/acre) to the east.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set
forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff is
recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of approval.
Chairman Matthes requested that a letter from the Bel -Aire Estates Homeowners Association be
read into record. Ms. Gilmore read the following: "This letter is in response to your letter dated
June 8°i, 2002 concerning the rezoning of property within 500 feet of 5106 Turnpike Feeder
Road. On behalf of the Bel -Aire Community Hall located at 325 Pandora Avenue, we have no
objection to the rezoning of 5106 Turnpike Feeder Road from Commercial, Neighborhood to
Commercial, Office by Dr. Emilio Martinez. Respectfully submitted, Diane E. Shaw, President,
Bel -Aire Estates."
Chairman Matthes questioned if the petitioner was present. Mr. Emilio Martinez came forward
and stated that he was the petitioner for this application and thanked the Commission for
considering his petition,
Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing.
Seeing no one, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Merritt stated that after considering the testimony presented during the public
hearing, including Staff Comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section
11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County
Commissioners grant approval to the application of Emilio Martinez, for a Change in
Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the CO (Commercial,
Office) Zoning District because it fits in with the existing land use.
Motion seconded by Mr. Hearn.
Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 7-0) and forwarded to the
Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 22
h auU
u
AGENDA ITEM 5: EAST FLORIDA PRIMITIVE BAPT15T DISTRICT ASS6dATI0N,
INC. - FILE NO. CU-02-006:
Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 5 was the application of East
Florida Primitive Baptist District Association, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit to allow social
services (educational services and facility) in the I (Institutional) Zoning District for property
located at 3950 Juanita Avenue. He continued that the surrounding zoning is RM-5 (Residential,
Multiple -Family - 5 du/acre) to the south and east, I (Institutional) zoning directly east and
further east and RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning to the west. He also stated
that IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning is located to the north and IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning is
located to the northwest. He continued that the applicant has applied for the requested
conditional use in order to establish an educational facility for a maximum of 200 students for a
religious school. A church facility is currently located on the subject property. The applicant is
proposing the addition of two new 4,320 square foot classroom buildings. Educational Services
and Facilities are allowed as conditional uses in this zoning district subject to the approval of the
Board of County Commissioners.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set
forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff is
recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of approval, subject to two limiting conditions.
1. The number of students shall be limited to a maximum of 200.
2. The hours of operation for the educational facility shall be from 7 A.M to 6
P.M., Monday through Friday.
Mr. Grande questioned if there is an entrance already existing off of Juanita Avenue or is a new
entrance going to be constructed. Mr. Flores stated that there is currently an existing entrance
with parking in place at this time. Mr. Grande asked why the difference of solid and dotted lines
on the site plans. He continued that on the site plan there is a parking area to the right of the
existing sanctuary in solid lines and then on the left it shows dotted lines for an additional
parking area. He questioned if the parking west of the sanctuary exist today and Mr. Flores
stated that was correct. Mr. Lounds stated that the aerial photograph provided in their packets
shows the existing parking more clearly.
Chairman Merritt asked if the petitioner or their representative were present. Mr. David Phillips
from Culpepper & Terpening stated they would be representing the applicant. He also stated that
this project was originally developed back in 1990 and the dotted lines on the site plan originally
represented the grass stabilized parking areas. He continued that as part of the development, they
tried to locate the two modular buildings on the corner, and the existing grass parking would be
moved towards the south property line. He stated that the applicant is looking to open the
educational facilities in mid -August 2002 and are trying to obtain an expedient schedule. He also
stated that they have had pre -application meetings with the SFWMD, as well as the local FPUA
and DER He advised that everything has been submitted for approval and are waiting on the
permits. He stated that he would be happy to answer any questions.
Mr. Hearn questioned why the information stated, "existing paved parking" to remain but Mr.
Phillips just advised that it is grass parking. Mr. Phillips stated that right now there are portions
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 23
K"
a ?
J 4':
of the, project that have paved parking and driveways and the grass parking that curren �icists�a�}
wraps around the east side of the project and continues around the north side. He advised that
everything shown within the solid lines is paved parking. Mr. Hearn then asked Staff if the grass
parking area is acceptable. Mr. Flores stated that it is acceptable with church facilities and they
based parking on the sanctuary area, which allows them up to 75% in grass parking.
Chairman Merritt opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Charles Hendly stated he is a member of East Florida Primitive Baptist District Association
and stated he has a concern because the staff report shows daycare and pre-school facility but
they are proposing a school. Mr. Flores advised that was an error in the report but was
advertised for educational facilities and services. Chairman Merritt questioned the hours of
operation listed at 5:00 P.M in condition #2 because they might need later hours for after hour
activities. Mr. Hendly stated that he believes they changed the hours to 6 P.M. because most
individuals get done work at 5 P.M. and this would allow them time to pick up their children.
Mr. Flores stated that in his presentation he confirmed the new time of 6 P.M. instead of 5 P.M.
Chairman Merritt questioned why a school was being restricted to a closing of 6 P.M. because
they might want to have activities at 7 or 8 P.M. at night. Mr. Flores stated that in review of their
applications they had stated that the church services and school operations would not be
operating at the same time. Mr. Hendly stated they would accept that because usually there is
not any church service at night and they were mainly concerned with having sufficient hours to
allow time for parents to pick up their children.
Ms. Pinky Hendly stated that they had listed their hours of operation but would certainly have
activities from time to time past the closing time of 6:00 P.M. She advised that would not
conflict with the church services and stated she did not want the time limited to 5:30 P.M. She
also stated that they were planning on having activities at the facility on a limited basis.
Chairman Merritt questioned if Ms. Hendly was stating that they need additional hours at certain
times and she confirmed that they would indeed need additional hours at certain times.
Chairman Merritt questioned Staff if this would be a problem. Mr. Kelly stated that they do not
have a problem with that and that the sanctuary could be used because there are no limits on the
hours for the sanctuary. He also stated that they were not intending to limit the actual use of the
classroom building in the evenings, just the hours of the students' day at school. Chairman
Merritt stated he could see setting times for a daycare but since this is a school it should be a
different situation. Mr. Kelly stated that if the Commission wished to change the conditions
Staff would not have any objection.
Mr. Lounds stated he would not have any problem extending hours to a school that is associated
with a religious facility. He also stated that any time a church wants to extend their teachings to
education and provide for the people, it is a wonderful thing. He advised that he wouldn't mind
seeing them having children at the school at 7 or 8:00 P.M. doing something productive with
their time. He questioned if there was any feedback from those on Jo Haywood Drive. Ms.
Hendly stated that they have not spoken to them directly and has not heard any comments at all
from anyone in that area. Mr. Lounds stated that sometimes those who live right next door to a
school become concerned with noise and things. Ms. Hendly stated that their actual school day
ends at 3:00 P.M. and will allow three hours for aftercare to allow time for parents to pick-up
their children. Mr. Lounds stated he has no problem with extending the time so that it best suits
the applicant and would best benefit their plans. Mr. Hearn stated that he would like to assure
Mr. Lounds that those on Jo Haywood Drive have been notified via the mailing and the signs.
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 24
Seeing noxoue else, Chairman Merritt closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Hearn stated that after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing,
including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.07.03, St.
Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant
approval to the application of East Florida Primitive Baptist District Association, Inc., for
a Conditional Use Permit to allow educational services and facilities in the I (Institutional)
Zoning District because it is going to be a quality extension of their church services, it
seems to fit into the community, and there are no residents here in objection to it ,.with the
following conditions:
1. The number of students shall be limited to a maximum of 200.
2. The hours of operation for the educational facility shall be from 7 a.m.
to 10 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Motion seconded by Mr. Trias.
Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 6-0) and forwarded to
the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 25
SAM
AGENDA ITEM 6: ORDINANCE 02-015 — Amend Land Develoyiiient".1Codea
(Architectural Standards & Non Conforming Lots):
Mr. Hearn stated that due to the hour he would like to continue this item again until the July 18`s
meeting. Ms. Young stated that if they wish to make a motion to continue again, they do need to
open the public hearing and hear any testimony and then once closed make that motion.
Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Rob Russell stated that he has been trying for almost three years to get a permit to build a
house on the lot he purchased. He also stated that he was in attendance at the previous June 200'
meeting but did not speak and that was continued. He advised that he is in real need of help with
his matter and would hope that they would not continue this item again.
Mr. Hearn stated that he wanted his motion to continue the portion of the ordinance that related
to architectural standards and would like to resolve the non -conforming lot issues tonight.
Chairman Matthes questioned if that could be done since both items were originally presented as
one ordinance. Ms. Young stated that it is one ordinance and they could discuss the portion that
relates to non -conforming lots but they would have to make a motion with regards to the
ordinance as a whole. She continued that since it is one ordinance, they would not be able to just
vote on half of it. Mr. Hearn questioned if they have to give a yes or no on the whole ordinance
or could they give two separate recommendations on each subject. Ms. Young stated their
motion could indicate that they are making an overall recommendation for the ordinance as a
whole, but add that they are in support of one part or the other. Chairman Matthes asked if they
could recommend that the architectural portion be broken out of this ordinance and have it re-
presented under a separate number. Ms. Young stated that they could recommend that it be done
that way.
Mr. Grande stated that this point came up last month and that they would really not like to have
ordinances that cover multiple, separate categories under one number and would not like this to
happen again. He continued thatWrdinancet'Should be single topics only and would like some
justification as to why they are lumping together different subjects. Ms. Young stated that they
should make a recommendation for approval or denial of the ordinance as a whole, but then
include in the recommendation that they would like the architectural portion separated. She
continued that it would go to the Board as presently drafted unless directed differently by the
Commission. Mr. Kelly stated that the LPA could recommend that they would like to have it
separated when it goes to the Board. Chairman Matthes questioned if they could request all
reference with regards to architectural standards be deleted and then leave the rest of this
ordinance as it is with regards to non -conforming lots but bring back the architectural portion
under a separate number. Ms. Young stated they could recommend that if that it what they want.
Mr. David Kelly, Planning Manager stated that Agenda Item # 6 was continued from the June
20t' meeting and proposed two amendments to the County's Land Development Code. He stated
that he was going to use St. Lucie Gardens as an example to show a pattern of lots that has a row
of easements for access alternating on the property lines. He advised that several years ago this
was reviewed and they decided that it was not a good idea to continue to allow lots of
development on easements where the county would not be able to provide roads and could cause
service issues. He continued that the County currently has a restriction that states if you have a
non -conforming lot of record, if you have more than two or three parcels in a row, they are
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 26
considered to be one parcel unless they are ilivided by a roadway or easement. He stated that
they had been approached about situations where an individual had three lots together, not
separated by anything, and they sold parcels in a private transaction. Those individuals that
bought the parcels tried to apply for a building permit and were told their parcel is considered to
be part of the parent parcel and was never legally divided under the non -conforming statues. He
also stated that this amendment would eliminate the contiguous lot prohibition. He continued
that, if approved, a series of lots under common ownership would revert back to the original legal
description of the parcel. He stated that if you have five lots, under the current guideline, they
would be considered one. He advised that under the proposed amendment it would be
considered as five.
Mr. Trias asked how this would be solved. Mr. Kelly stated that by changing the language in the
Land Development Code to take out all of paragraph 2 and some of the language in paragraph 1
that says, "such lot must be in separate ownership". Mr. Merritt stated that he failed to see the
common sense in the way the current code is written. Mr. Kelly stated that is why they are trying
to correct some of these issues with this change. Mr. Grande stated that if they were public roads
instead of private easements, then it would not be an issue. Mr. Kelly confirmed that was
correct. Mr. Hearn questioned the wording in the first paragraph, around the 18t' line, about a
variance from yard dimensions and if it meant the distance that a house has to be from a side
yard. Mr. Kelly stated that it is pointing out that any variances that may be needed have to be
acquired from the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Hearn asked what the definition of "yard
dimensions" was. Mr. Kelly stated it is discussing those areas other than area, width, or frontage.
Mr. Hearn stated that the word "yard dimension" is with regards to setbacks and Mr. Kelly
confirmed that would be correct.
Mr. Rob Russell stated that he is in this situation because he bought a lot from someone in St.
Lucie Gardens who had owned lots that were contiguous. He continued that he received a letter
from Ms. Linda Pendarvis of the Public Works Department that stated they determined his
property does not meet the criteria for a non -conforming lot of record and lacks the required road
frontage for AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 dulacre) zoning. He stated that his lot is off of
Tilton Road, which is east of U.S. 1 off of Dyer Road. He continued that the man who sold him
the lot had purchased three separate lots at three separate times but since the one he purchased
was contiguous it became unbuildable. He questioned why they are considered to be one lot
when they were each purchased at separate times and they pay three different property taxes for
each individual property. He also stated that there are homes to the right and left of his and they
are buildable, which doesn't make sense to him. He advised that his lot is only 330 feet from the
corner of Tilton Road and has spoken with Commissioner Bruhn about these issues. Chairman
Matthes questioned if this proposed change would solve Mr. Russell's problems. Mr. Kelly
advised that it is his understanding that it would.
Mr. Merritt questioned if by changing this they would be creating more problems. Mr. Kelly
stated that he isn't sure if it would create any more problems but that it would resolve many of
the problems that have come from the original change. Mr. Hearn stated that he ran into a
situation where he sold a lot but previously the same man owned two contiguous lots, the lot he
sold was not considered to be buildable. Mr. Russell stated that is the same type of situation he
is in today and that people behind his property are buildable, but he isn't. Mr. Grande questioned
if this problem has arisen because Meehan Lane (which is now Tilton Road) is a private road.
Mr. Kelly confirmed that is correct and if it were a county or public road, in general, this would
not be an issue.
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 27
Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Russell if he was planning on building a home on that lot. . Russell
stated that he had been approved to build a home, using the lot as collateral, almost three years
ago, but was denied when he came in to request his building permit. He continued that he had
his lot prepped to be built on at that time but has been fighting ever since to get a permit to build.
Seeing no one else, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Hearn made a motion to recommend approval of the amendments to the wording in
Section 10.00.04, Section A, Number 1 and to delete Number 2 in it's entirety, Non -
Conforming Lots and also to delete all sections regarding creating Section 7.10.24, Interim
Architectural Standards and have those resubmitted under a separate ordinance number.
Motion seconded by Mr. Merritt.
Upon a roll call vote, the motion was unanimously approved (with a vote of 7-0) and
forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 28
EMI t
ram!
OTHER BUSINESS/DISCUSSION:
T�7
Next scheduled meeting will be July 18, 2002.
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Hearn made a motion to adjourn. Meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
awn Gilmore, Secretary
Approved by:
Stefan Matthes, Chairman
P & Z Meeting
June 20, 2002
Page 29
Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 08/15/02
��C\6 CpGy
� File Number Rz-02-013
co F1 -<
oRMEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Manager
DATE: August 9, 2002
SUBJECT: Application of Glassman Holdings, Inc. for a Change in Zoning from the
AG-1 (Agricultural — 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial,
General) Zoning District. (File No.: Rz-02-013)
LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of Indrio Road and
Emerson Road.
EXISTING ZONING: AG-1 (Agricultural 1 du/acre)
PROPOSED ZONING: CG (Commercial, General)
FUTURE LAND USE: COM (Commercial)
PARCEL SIZE: 25.99 acres
PROPOSED USE: Uses consistent with the CG (Commercial General) Zoning
District
PERMITTED USES: Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(S) CG (Commercial,
General) - contains the designated uses, which are
permitted by right, permitted as an accessory use, or
permitted through the conditional use process. Any use
designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo
further review and approvals. Any use not found within the
zoning district regulations are designated as prohibited
uses for that district
SURROUNDING ZONING: RS-2 (Residential, Single -Family - 2 du/acre) to the south
and west. AG-1 (Agricultural — 1 du/care) Zoning to the
north, south, east, and west. IX (Industrial, Extraction) to
the east. I (Institutional) Zoning to the east and north.
SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is some
residential and agricultural.
1' 'i tY tf � )• �`` �y` I
_ hfi+
l i f
4 t i
Z
y
St•``t� aY
,r
August 9 t2b02 j S.lib�ect Glassman Holdings, lnct.
Pa e 2 , . 02 02=013
9` v
1� 4
The :Future Land Use.: Classification of `the . surrounding.
Art 4i{ 1
area: is RU (Residential{ lJrban) to the east RS
(Residential Suburban) Ito the
r
southeast ` RE , (( esidential�
z
Estate) to the east COIVI (Commercial) to the' south and
southeast ' MXD=Airport (Mixetl` Use Airport). is IocatEd to
the :south:
FIRE/EM$ PROTECTION:. Station #7 (4900 Ft,' Pierce .Boulevard), is located
apprbxirhp ely, l trills to the east
UTILITY.SERVICE: Water and sewer facilities are in the .St, Lucie County
Utilities service area.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
RIGHT OF WAY _
ADEQUACY. The ;existing right-of-way for IndnoRoad is 60 feet.. The
existing right-of-way, for Emerson Road. is 60
-feet, ,'The
existing right of way for F P FW.M.p. Canal No. `6 is 80
eet-
fW.
SQHEDULED,:
IMPROVEMENTS: one.,.
TYPE OF.CONC,URRENCY
DOCUMENT'REQUIRED: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit.
STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET. FORTH 44SECTION 14106.031
•1
ST. LUCIE COUNTY:LAND DEVELOP(VIEWtODE:
;
In , reviewing this application . for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning
Commission shall consider and make tha following determinations:
1. Whether the proposed "rezoning is in conflict with any:.' applicable portions
of the St l ucie County Land Development Code;
The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code and specifically ,has Imet the standards :of 11.06:03,
2: Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of•the St.
Lucie County Comprehensive Plan;
The proposed change in zoning is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie
County Comprehensive . Plan. The request. is compatible. with the COM
(Commercial) Future Land Use classification,' which' allows commercial general
zoning. '
-
i
August 9;.2002
Page 3
' 3. Whether and' the e d
the existing 'and prop
The proposed zoning,
The proposed ;zoning
subteot� property is -at-
,
lanned for, ingle farm
4. Whether there have;
Conditions= have not ok
has conhnUed.�to grow
pressure.
5.. ` Whether and: the I exte
demands on pualic,l
proposed am. ndmen
including but not-.limt
supply,'parks draiiha
medreal'facilities;.
The intended use,aor. th
demands on any publi
demonstrate that these
development. Water
Roadways.'inthe area
may capture t"rips, whjcl
old grove.
ire not_ at -capacity, cornmerpiai ,aeveioprnent at,mis sire
August 9,
Page 4
8.'
Road rn order to develop the property for . '.o ciah uses:
y
Attached is a co .6 Sections 3 01 03 S CG Commerce . I ,General), 'of, the -St.; W le
F
County Land Development Code, which delineates the permitted,. accessory, and.."conditional
`
used aAowed in ' this zoning If a change in zoniri� =is approYed, the applicant, by
.diz?trict:. . ;right,
would be,allowed to estabiiOO', any of the, uses; under' the Permitted lses section.", Any use
, .
M '
under the Accessory li4i section'wouId be allowed =only if :one o rrIore pf the> permitted uses "
exist' onj'the subject: property. Any use; under the ,Conditional Use$ section could. only
all lf, it first receives approval through the Board of `Co'unty Commissioners.
j
Staff has' reviewed this petition and determined � that it conforms to the 'standards of
r
r
review'as set Mirth in Sectio:06 n 1103 of the St Lucie .County Land Development Code and is
not in conflict with the `goals, objectives', and policies' df the. St. Lucie .County Comprehensive,, '
Plan.; Staff is recommending 'that. you forward' 'this petition .to 'the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
Please contact this office if -you have any questions on this matter.
-
hf r
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Lindsey Walter
Noreen Dryer, Esq.' '
File
Yt 4 4 Srt, fj -y. gC S F 2 i
py
'f �PJ'43`
- fm'k
df
tj
�kc l tx;YY 4t`�q. i
.
klXjt
,.
Suggested motion to recommend approval/den�at of this requested change jnzornnWE-g _r
n
;s sx31G,�
MOTION TO APPROVE k �'
,
a�
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC
HEARING;`T'rb
4�
INCLUDING STAFF COMM NTS,:AND TFiE STANDAIR -OP REVIEW AS SET
FORTH iN
4
-SECTION:`11 06 0 ST.."�Wat" COUNTY_ LAND DkVELOP_MENT CODE, `THEREBY MOVE
� xs
,
.THAT THE
E PLANNING AND
"CommZONING'COMMISSION REC'011hM ND THAT THE
ST LUCIE
A
COUNTY BOARD . OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS :GRANT APPROVAL . - 'THE ,
,
APPLICATIONOF GLASSMAN HOLDINGS, INC, FOR ACHANGE INZONING PROM
-T,,HE
AG-1 (AORICULTURAL - ;1 ZONING DISTRICT TO `,THE 'CG (COMMERCIAL,
5
.DU/AC)
`
GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT; BECAUSE ...
. _.'
b
FY `
[CITE REASONS] WHY -PLEASE
F
Yi
MOTION TO.DENY
s�
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
r�
INCL"UDING STAFF COMMENTS,. AND THE STANDARDS`OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH- IN1,,
SECTION 11.06:03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING, AND ZONING `COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT. THE si , LUCIE
azt:
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE'' APPLICATION OF
GLASSMAN HOLDINGS, INC., FOR A CHANGE IN , ZONING FROM ` THE AG=1,
(AGRICULTURAL - 1 DU/AC)-ZONING DISTRICT TO THE CG (COMMERCIAL,' GENERAL)
ZONING:DISTRICT, BECAUSE....
[CITE REASON[S] WHY -PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
3.01.03
A. AG-1
Purpose
ZONING DISTRICTS
AGRICULTURAL - 1
The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for productive
commercial agriculture, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with
productive agricultural surroundings. Residential densities are restricted to a maximum of one (1)
dwelling unit per gross acre. The number in "()" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC
code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under
the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this Code.
2. Permitted Uses
a. Agricultural production - crops (o,)
b. Agricultural production - livestock & animal specialties (02)
C. Agricultural services to>>
d. Family day care homes. (999)
e. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of
one thousand (1,000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that
the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies
the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed
by HRS. (999)
f. Fishing, hunting & trapping (og)
g. Forestry (oe)
h. Kennels. (0752)
i. Research Facilities, Noncommercial (8733)
j. Riding stables. (79")
k. Single-family detached dwellings. (999)
3. Lot Size Requirements
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00.
4. Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00.
5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements
Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00.
6. Landscaping Requirements
Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.
7. Conditional Uses
a. Agricultural labor housing. t999i
Adopted August 1, 1990 94 Revised Through 08/01/00
^s tY
F
{ tE
r iY'
:Section 3 0\1 03
` Zoning Distinct Use Regulations
:
u ugq
i Y
NW
} ys�
S. CG"
CQMMERCIAL GENERAL
tWy
}
'L� _
\
1: Purpose=
w 1
M
M 1 }"`-�
' '
i "N
The:purpose
of this district is.to provide and protect an envlronMent suitable for a Wide ;variety
aon avalFematcommerciauses. intended to servea populteaewhich do not impose
�r
undesirable noise vibration; odor, tlusf; or affehstve ejfeets on the surrounoing area, together with
4 "
such otheruses as Maybe necessary"to and compatible with general commercial starroungin�s
number m "O" following each identified' use .corresponds tb the SIC code` reference described in
SePtion 01 02(B) The`number 999 appliesto a use not difined under the SIC node but maybe
r ,
further,defined in Se6, 6n'2:00.00 of this code.:
a'}
2. • Perrnitted
z
Arl& menticollection &credit reporting services (732)
i y,
b.
Advertising tr3,r
c:
ArrPhitheaters (999j -
d:
Amusements &recreation services except.tadrums; arenas, race tracks, amusement parks
and bingo parlotsns)
e:
Apparel & ,accessory. stores (ss) .
f,
Autofiobile dealers �ss�
k fi
Automotive rental, repairs & sery (except body repairs) tis,,s3.�sar" ,
-
h.
Beauty and barber services :(723724)`
i.`
Building materials,, hardware and garden supply csz>
j .
Cleaning services 73ae)
k
Coiimercial pnnt!ng tss9r
1.
Cornrnunitatrons except towers c+er
m,
Computer programming, data pr."gcessing &.other computer seiv. cr3rr
n i
Contract constorage only) ijs! nr
o
Gi iltural activs and nature exhibitions
p.
Diaplicatirig, mailing, commercial artlphbto. & stenog. erv.: t33i
q.
Eating places'cse;r'.
r„
Ediacational,servio, = except publicschools lair
s:
Engineering, accounting, tesearch, management & related services te7i .
t..
Equipmentrental and leasing servrces.(735)
U.
Executive, legislative, and,judiclal:funct ons ts,isys304ississ/szi
V.
Farrrt labor and management'services.676i .
w...
Financial; nsurance,.and real estate (60/611621G3/64165/67) `
x..
Food stores ti
- =y;
Funeral and crematory.servrces:r,�et—.
' z.
Gasoline service stations tsscii
aa:
General merchandise stor`es,t53i
bb.
Health services.teoi
cc.
Home furnitUre and furnishings.tsri.
_ dd.
Landscape. '& horticultural seivicps,twer_
ee. "
Laundry; cleaning!and gatmentservices.721r
ff.
Membership � organizations - except for religious organizations :as . provided in Section
8.0.01(N) of this codetiesr
C
_99- "
%
Miscellaneous retail (see:SlC Code Major Group.59):
(1) : Drug5tores,t591i,
Adopted August
1, 1990 > 118 Revised Through 08/01/00
at
Al
L Section -& 01":03
�
Zornng Oistnct UseRegulations
}
x y
(2) Used merchandise stores (593)
flp w
(3); Sporting'goods:ss4>>
(4) Book & s,tationary(ssa2issas) ,
a,
(5) Jewelry`tseaai
,
(6) Hobby, toy and games jssas)
t x
, F
(7) Gamera &photographic supplies tssas>
t
nbveity and spuvenlr`tssaz�
(9) Luggage;& leather goods tssae).
r
`
(10) P bric acid mill products tssesi"
�;.
(11) Catalog, mail order aA' direct seAmg, csss,rsss3>
'
{12) Liquified petroleumas(propane) �ssea>
2 4R'r
\
(13) Florists.ts992►`
\
(14) Topacco isss3z
(15) "News deniers%newsstands tss9a�
(16) Optical goods (5095)
-3
(17) Misc retail (See SIC Code for "specific uses),'(siw
hh.
Miscellaneous personal services (see SIC Code Mator Group 72):
1
(1.)' Tax return services.Pisi -
Misc. retail (See SIC Code for specific uses)"nissj.
,
Miscellaneous business services (see tiSiC Code Major Group 73),:
(1)' . Detective; guard and; armored car services (7e-1)
Security systemservtees"tr�ezi
(3)News syn'dicate`�
`
(4) Photofnish�ng laboratories t73eaf'.
(5) Bu`siness<services MISC.t;i
.�j.
Mobile:hor 16 dealers'is2»_ ,
kk. '"
Motile food vendors "(eating places, &vegetables
IL"
,fruit, -retail)
Motion pictures (ta
Motor vehwle. parking t:ommerciai parking& Vehicle storage. nszj
Y
nit "
Museums; galleries and gardens teak
oo.
Personnel supply services
pp�
Photo finishing. services
q%
Phofograpf is services azz►
i'ostal, services tail:;-,
s$.
Recreation facilities (ion
Repair services.�si:;
uu:
Retail trado4ndoordispiay acid sales oFily, except as provided in Section 7.00.00. sss�
VV.
"Social services -
(.1), - IA d y'idual &;family social services te32839i
(2)" Child care services te3s�
;fob' training and vocational rehabilitation services tsar
ww.. `"
, Travel agencies (4124�
xx:
Veterinary services iom .:
3, Lof Size Requirements "
Lot size requirements shag be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
Adopted August 1,
1990 119 Revised Through 08/01/00
i
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations '.
i
_ r
4.
Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
5. --
Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements
Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00.
6..
Landscaping Requirements '
Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.
7.
Conditional Uses
a. ` Adult establishments subject to requirements of Sec. 7.10.10: ts991
b. Drinking, places -(alcoholic beverages) - free-standing: (5ei3)
c. Disinfecting &pest control services. (7342
d. Amusement parks. (79%)
e. Go. cart tracks. (7999)
f. Hotels & motels. (7ot)
g. Household goods warehousing and storage=mini-warehouses tmf
h. Marina - recreational boats only: (4493)
Motor vehide repair services - body repair. pw)
\ . '
J. Sporting and recreational camps. po32)
k- Retail trade:
(1.) Liquor stores. (592)
k. Stadiums, arenas, and race tracks.. (7sa)
I. Telecommunication -towers - subject;.to the standards of Section 7.10.23. (m)
8.
Accessory Uses -
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following:
a. , Drinking places.01coholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and/or civic, social,
and fraternal organizations).
b. One single-family dwelling unit contained within the commercial building, or a detached
single-family dwelling or mobile home, (for on -site security purposes)'.
C. Retail trade:
(1). Undistilled alcoholic beverages (accessory to retail sale of,food).
f
r
A •:
Adopted August 1, 1990 120 Revised Through 08/01/00
iM
W.,
z
0
U
Z
H
Q
A Petition of Glassman Holdings, Inc. for a Change in Zoning from
AG-1 (Agricultural,1 uniVacre) to CG (Commercial, General).
1
n
b
C
Z
2
c
b
c
u
o
c
d
�
V.
4
n:
RZ 02-013
This pattern indicates
subject parcel
.'�a-
Map prepared June 21, 2002
Tho map Na been e—VW Wg.- 1pt—&V and 1-6 r PaPo MY N
W,ft ft" ~ ha been made b W—de ft most cure 4 and aaaaxe
kft—Ow paaa . Y Is wended Im use as a WOW bkeOV doaanmf.
a. rc. a*oig
mares rtoao
n
RS-28
o
O
10
0
0
AGA
d
d
a
4
I
4
L
RZ 02-013� ¢ 4
This pattern Indicates Map prepared June 21, 2002
subject parcel � � � mem m-VW Woon.W°�° WW papas.. .
wN. a" «antra. men m.ft to amid. ma ffW a-ml W4 amaaal.
W—OW Pmaeba. xis nml Yxendem ar use as a Wg*an*V mma.Wt
Land Use Glassman Holdings, Inc.
RZ 02-013
This pattern indicates
subject parcel
GLS
Map prepared June 21, 2002
wt" may ~ tw been W. to P, +ft 0. -.9 —.M wW ac w-
YAowmWn po.abl%k is rot kKwdW I& use a. a WgaM bfru ' Eoa—M.
�����,mill
t 8 � "7. u,`.�ck"�,--o-.,.°+�
pp 3 t Y tEE {j
Y. ! � � 3 �Y� i .a,..t AMR
1 141'�Z
3^h144w
WAR
w
ts+'
iT t ,a a
K19 a �,
_Xa f�
�' Elli,,, `•,
IA
?�ir777
Whys
7 t
sY
wxg
AN
KAW
•i
�cw. t i a �s 3 - £a .,,r` uY't q«.$• "£ .>
a.`ei�Mv YY wdr. { - Sds 2w f6 '
�
- A
NELSON
FIT Wk onto
F tgsg z�a MESA,
IPA
sit-
p r
_ .Yfy Zan
1Iy � % ,7 c
WOOD
21 ey
� � p ;,;
. 1i ...i«.,.,,��„ as.�?" .+ .<= a / i law. 9 }" p
'.`- +.�.:L .. `1YSSY _t�h...ss se,�..�.mf�.... m, y6 J I .� r6 ri 9
� � t- � � - � �� s.. #R JnK,d g � t rj ��t .a ✓H f � Sa`sari t i�
'"fiil
n f3 {''y
f ��j" ty( t
AWN
E Y i } ; ky ," £ r4i "4 'a` 3� d S 3�{�P:i F)a4.4� e
3f
�ti��
7. a Ft ra ✓t.��t"FI ,' Sv � r-R �„%c t�Y'S[ 111 Ways.t
,,, [ Air-...r•-r:,r --^ a�
P �t X`r3 �'i �` � 9 �
7yy 5 i,-.''$;}D�� "'SSW..
€ f ':x - ✓"' .8=� yrks n. '. a_. t.." �.�L �`a ' ip� B� €• �� t• �« g�73Y � po. � �
Py �. t ;,t',¢.i. 5��! � -r�s �� � � 9 �i 1t � 7� 6Ey
,„°�'�t -.: 1i+yFg'2 ij;�
r 3t y R -d -:a "?`.'.r rykJ } t t .? a a ( t [� f att �4z f.
. f ; t 8 X n..s bF _� :-ry_ d ), Yak ; i t9$EEisJ tg}lam i�
} a %z i't(tt4�.ty�i t';a ± to ;v sci r
e f _ .. �.t: �-��.� (� a a• 3� =".
_ � jy '3 ? i E7 a#'ak #1 � L.. '�Di4 � �3. 73 tg �4 ��7pI� ��3 i
-�i. - a�],t ��,"a, ?. �i �g§� F2 J�! � 3'.;f-�' � ����r� t ��Z ��.° y` 1� �y'{#3t e1..
s f as 'M £ YiSS�
"_ . a> r+ < 3 3 '<., ;a.� >•r s-a. i F r3 r, pi Ca i 4 i ( - § t( J 'iE °
t @ #�a' qhh ': °p'r3s i
i E<_{ Tom,
7-a_<.. :-.�.rzc^.ec'm
t 4 ; { A sy
f,31'�¢s9R:�..� 8r�7aF�E :iifl.ii _ Ya}'_€_._ s 1o,Pa x 3i3 F�33i?II
AGENDA - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
THURSDAY, August 15, 2002
7. 00 P.M.
GLASSMAN HOLDINGS, INC., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning
from the AG-1 (Agricultural - I dulacre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning
District for the following described property:
Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of Indrio Road and Emerson
Avenue.
Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically
recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with
respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the
proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is
to be based Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing
will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any
individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the
public hearing will also be considered.
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners
August 5, 2002. Legal notice was published in The News and The Tribune, newspapers of general
circulation in St. Lucie County, on August 1, 2002.
File No. RZ-02-013
BOARD OF; COUNTY L• COMMU N ITY > "
COMMISSIONERS DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
�'��OR1OP
August 5, 2002
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that GLASSMAN
HOLDINGS, INC., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural
- 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the following described
property:
Locations Northwest corner of the intersection of Indrio-Road and Emerson Avenue.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
The first public hearing on the petition will be held at 7.00 P.M,, or as soon thereafter as possible, on
Thursday, August IS, 2002, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building
Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida, All interested persons will be given an opportunity to
be heard at that time. Written comments. received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered.
Written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission should be received by the County Planning
Division tit least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual •Planning and Zoning Commission and County
Commission on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s) You may speak at a public hearing, or
provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. ' If a person decides to
appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at
such meeting or hearing, he will_ need a -record of the proceedings, For such,purpose, he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any partyto the proceeding, individuals testifying .
during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-
examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing
may be continued to a date -certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above -described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call 7721462-1582 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number RZ-02,013,
Sincerely, -
ST. LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Stefa atthes, Chairman
jOHN D. BRUHN; District No. 1 • DOUG COWARD. District No: 2 PAULA A. LEWIS, District No. 3 FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No. 4 CLIFF BARNES, District No. 5
County Administrator - Douglas'M. Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue - FortPierce, FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 • Planning: (712) 462-2822 GIS/fechnical Services: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 Fox: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention:(772) 462-1529 • Fox: (772),462-2132
www.cost-lucie. fl . us
�D
O
M
M
M
to VNj
M M
N
CD 00
W) M N CD—
M M ` h O
M t N M
00
O
M
kn
�.�-,
Oh �� I �O
h t t t
M
�O
�O
t
h
O,
M
h
N
M
i
. .
.�i I� cs ON io
I(M
O
CA
� (� ON
�LM�
ON
tn
ON
N }} M
!_ _ .,
M M
M.1!_ {1 M) M M J
i —Ii
M
r
L_J M M
M
M
I'
Ij �fC/�;(fS,I�w�iwlLw,Lwiiw„w
w,,w,�w,�wjiE-•i,w�1w�
wlLw��w�tw
��
j
U
a,
�
al a�
Cd.C,
a, a Ylia� o
oo1�����
o
i
a'a a
a
a
U
o
U_ Lw°
a°q
�w°, w°
_wolI a°q w° ILx >j
>
LxJJL°J0I wo
w°
w°
w
a
-7
I
t
oa;u:ax
0
0
>~ o U •� rn
o
rn
CD
b b b
O O
.�
o
�C�y3y
y
`�'
o
N N
.-, .
N N N .� N
.-,
0
o
N
y
o
W
U) U)
^�
W Vn W W O
O M x O
OPiz
v� .-
h
po
I
N N
h
N N
N O h �t 00
(� O O h h O
N - to N to a,
O
a,
.+ O O O
N 0000
O\ o0 00 00
OOh
M
N
to
to
--
o0
O
ti
z
U
►�
0
o
H M
IMIL—ji
if11
o
1101"nnIL
11
1,,,,
o
aN
�Ot
4104
4-4
Z
atititi�
a s
a
ram
"
�
a
b
b
a
b
a
A x
b
Y
y
y
U
•q C,
o
y
AAA
U
U
U
0
"O
Uy�U.aa�fli
*
.4
U
o
w
w
ww0
o
o
��
ao
v0
�
K
>o
3UCtia
w O
W
h
O
�o
O
cN
O
00
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
�O
O
a0
O
O
h
O
�O
O
N
O
O
O
M
O
0,
O
O,
O0.0
�--�
0
O
0
0
0
O_
0
O_
0
O_
0
O_
0
O
0
O
0
O_
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0O
O
11111111
0
O
0
O
O
•--�
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
0
io
m
O
M
0
O
0
0
�--�
0
O
N
0
O
O—
•-+
O
o
O
•--�
O
O
O-
N
O
0
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.M-.
•--�V'Ntot1�toNC�r.r.2:-
Vim'milli
N
.-�--
.M.
.M.
.M-,
.M-�
-,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY'
PLANNING AND ZONING C.OMMISSIQN"
PUBLIC HEARING
AGENDAo
( .
August 15, 2002;. ..
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with.,: Section -
1 ].00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Develop"t.Code'
S. WYNNE RANCH, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow
the operation of an Air Curtain Incinerator in the U (Utili-
-
- - and the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive
ties) Zoning District for the following described property:.:
- -
Plan, the following applicants have requested'that the St.
Lucie County Planning and. Zoning Commission
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE
:consider
their following requests:
QUARTER (1 /4) OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH,
RANGE 37 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND
1. CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
for a Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single-
Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the 1 (Institutional),
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
Zoning District for the.following described property:
SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 87°57'45" WEST, AS A
BASIS OF BEARINGS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF '
THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1 4 OF
/
SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 2672.00 FEET TO
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE '
SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40,EASTI
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS ROAD RIGHT•ON
QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH
WAYS AND FURTHER LESS THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE;
00°27'15" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 5, A
SOUTH 210 FEET.
DISTANCE OF 1894.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN-
Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Selvitz
NING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00°27'15" EAST
ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 656.70
Road and Edwards.Road.
:.
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°.19'16" EAST, DEPARTING .
2. TIMOTHY AND DEBRA ROSE CAR WASH; for a Coddi-
Permit
fional Use Permit to allow the operation
ratio wash'
SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF' 656.70 FEET;. •.
THENCE SOUTH 00°27-15".. WEST, A DISTANCE OF
of a car
facility in the (Commercial, Nei g °Oct) Zoning Dis-
656.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°19'16" WEST; A DIS-
TANCE OF 656.70 FEET TO THE POINT
trig for the followingdescribed Pr°P: ;t
.OF.
BEGINNING.
LOTS l i & 12, BLOCK 169, LAKEWOOD PARK,: UNIT
12A, -AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK'11, PAGE PUB-
SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT .FOR .INGRESS AND .
35,
LIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY; FLORIDA:`
EGRESS AND PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE OVER
THE WEST 25 FEET THEREOF.
Location: 5321 Sunshine State Parkway %. Turnpike "Feeder
Road.
CONTAINING 9,900 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. -
j 3. GLASSMAN.HOLDINGS; INC fora Cha )n Zonin
Location:' North side of Orange Avenue; approximately
^�. 9
from the AG 1 (Agricultural - 1 du/aae).Zoning District to
.5.75 miles west of Minute Maid Road. ,
the CG (Commercial, GeneraQ Zoning Distrid for the foi-
lowing de saibed.property:
.6. FLORIDA CENTER FOR RECOVERY, INC,,.for. a Condi
tional Use Permit to allow Soaal-Services and (iea)tit Core
IN SECTION .15, :TOWNSHIP 34 RANGE 39 THE
facilities in the I Institutional) Zoning Disrid for the fol
SOUTH 830 OF THE EAST! 1550 IF THE SOUTH 4 /2
lowing described property y,
I 'WHITE
OF NORTHEAST'1/4 LESS EAST 86WAND LESS
60 FT.:FOR ROAD-ANO CANAL=R(W 16(O:R
:
W
CITY S/D 0593640
BEGANW.COR.0F L'OftDTSOUTH
100 RUN ET35 fTTW W135 FT, TH N.TO74) POBLESS348-18
AND CANAL R/V✓= (44) (172 AC) (MAP a4/05S) (OR
Lomhon: Northwest comer of'!he iMersed ofi Indrfo
1524 2594); N
O
Road.and Emerson Avenue = r a
WHITE CITY S/D OS°36 40 THAT PART _'66 O ] O6 s� k
4 WYNNE RANCH, for a Change in Zoning fram;lhe"
4YG E OF DRAINAGE CANAL #k103 LESS TfiA7 PART
AG'-5 (AgricuNurol— l du 5 cores Zon+
/ ) ng Qrshid to tha 11
LYG N OF=DRAINAGE CANAL #103 AND P) 130 FT
OF LOT-S A 12:AND 113 LYG E' OF' DRAINAGE CANAL '
(Utilities) Zoning -District for -`the kllgwing described ; -
property
071`LES NDrCANAG
#103 ANDALL OF LOT 1 S-RD.A
R/VJ (10.45 AC7 (MAP,34/O55) (OR1524-2594)
Q -
A PARCEL OF LAND: f.YING IN THE SOUTH
QUARTER (1 /4) MSECTION 5-TOWNS IP 35vSOU HE
Location; 3451 West Midway Road.
RANGEi 37;FAS7; ST IUGIE,;COIINIa(y ,.1110A AND.
BEING MORE PARTJCULARLY'DESCRIBED/1$ EO1.LL04V$:
�
PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held -in Commiiiie Chamber% ,
.
Roger : Pathos Anne x 2300 Vugiriia Avenuq:.fort 3tierte
COMMENCE AT'THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
Florida on August 1 S,' 2002 beginning at 74)O P M or as r
SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 87°5T45: WEST; AS 'A
soomthereafter as possible:'.
BASIS OF BEARINGS, iAtONG T. E'SOUTH UNE OF.
SAID SECTION 5,.A DISTANCE OF 2672.00-TEET40
THE SOUTHWEST
m
PURSUANT TO Section 286.O1O5,.Florida Stq}utes W.
person decides to appeal any decision made.60 board,
CORNER'OF SAID:SO(" EAST•.ONE
QUARTER (1 /4) OF; :SECTION 5 THENCE NORTH
"age ry; or commission with respect to any nigtteftwttsid-
00°27'15" ,EAST, ALONG. THE WEST• LINE OF- SAID,
SOUTHWEST ONE (QUARTER,(1/4) 0F. SECTION S,:A.
erect af.a meeting or bearing Jte will peed a record of the thr,
proceedings, and that; for such purposes he may need to
o DISTANCE OF.1894.32fEETTOTHEPbINTOFBEGI(1-
NING THENCE' CONTINUE NORTH EAST
ensure that a verbatim record of the.proceedings is #104�,
which record includes Mre testimony and evidence upofi .
.00°2TY5
.ALONG SAID :WEST LINE. A DISTANCE OF 656:70
which the appeal is to be based,-{'
4
I
FEET; THENCE. SOUTH 89°19.16 EAST DEPARTING
SAID . WEST • LINE, A DISTANCE OF:. 656.70 FEET,
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
THENCE SOUTH 00-27"15" WEST, A .DISTANCE OF
656.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89*19*16" WEST; A DIS=
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
/S/ Stefan Matthes, CHAIRMAN .
TANCE OF 656.70 FEET. TO. _THE .' POINT :OF
BEGINNING:.
Publish: August 1, 2002
2487476
SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT- FOR;- INGRESS AND
EGRESS AND. PUBLIC UTILITY AND OVER
_DRAINAGE
THE WEST 25 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINING 9,906 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Location:' North side of Orange Avenue, approximately
_
5.75 miles west of Minute Maid Road.
Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 08/15/02
File Number RZ-02-014
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Manager,
11�
DATE: August 9, 2002
SUBJECT: Application of Church of the Redeemer of St. Lucie County for a
Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single -Family 3 du/acre)
Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-02-014)'
LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of Edwards Road and
Selvitz Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
FUTURE LAND USE.
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE:
PERMITTED USES:
RS-3 (Residential, Single -Family — 3 du/acre
I (Institutional)
RU (Residential Urban)
8.47 acres
Future expansion of church facilities
Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(X) I (Institutional) and
Section 3.01.03(Y) - contains the designated uses, which
are permitted by right, permitted as an accessory, use, or
permitted through the conditional use process. Any use
designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo
further review and approvals. Any use not found within the
zoning district regulations are designated as prohibited
uses for that district
SURROUNDING ZONING: I (Institutional) Zoning is to the east and northeast. RS-3
(Residential, Single -Family 3 du/acre) Zoning is to the
north, south, and west. AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1
du/acre) is located to the southwest.
SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is
residential to the south and across Edwards Road to the
it t4
t,
SL
��q
August 9,`2002 Sub et; Church of the RedEemer of St. Lucie Count
1. Y.
,
Page 2 RZ-02=014'
t .,.
4 .Kg,g gy
f north Other RF uses are. ,in the - immediate area along
Edwards,Road.
m { j
M
XT
The` Future Land Use Classification of the surrounding
area is RU (Residential Urban) to the west; south, and
ky�
F
north.. I?JF (Public Facilities to the east and northeast .0
FIRE/CMS PROTECTION: Station #1 (2400 Rhode 'lsiand Avenue), is.. located
approximately 3.5 miles to the northeast."
r}:
x ;
UTILITY SERVICE: Water and sewer facilities Will be provided by the Ft. Pierce
Utilifies Authorityservice:avea
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS ,
r
RIGHT OF WAY
ADEQUACY:. The.existing right -of4ay for.Edwards Road",is 66 feet. The
existing, right-of-way for Selvitz Road 'is .66 feet.
SCHEDULED
- 41
IMPROVEMENTS: None.
, r
,
4>
TYPE OF'.CONCURRENCY
, t
DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Concurrenoy Deferral Affidavit:
F�.
rt.
STANQARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FOiRTH IN, SECTION 11:06.03,
ST "LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
}
In reviewing .this application "for proposed rezoning, the .Planning and Zoning
Commission shall consider and make the following determinations:
C ` . WhetherIthe proposed rezoning Is in conflict with any_ applicable portions
.'
of the Luci St, e County"Land_Development Code;:
The proposed zoning distnct is consistent With the Sf: Lucie ,County Land
Development'Code -and-has=met the -standards of-11;06:03, "however; the=RF
(Religious Facilities)`Zoning.District was specifically created for the purpose of
providing a zoning district designation which would allow the types of uses
generally.found only in relation to church facilities.
2. Whether the proposam edendment is consistent with all elements of 1he St.
Lucie County Comprehensive Plan;
The proposed change in zoning is Iconsistent with all elements of the St. Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan. The request is compatible with the `RU
(Residential Urban) Future Land Use classification, which allows institutional.
August 9, 2002. Subject: Church of the Redeemer of St. Lucie County
Page 3 RZ-02-014
zoning. This future land use classification also allow for Religious Facilities
Zoning
3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with
the existing and proposed land uses;
RF (Religious Facilities) 'Zoning is consistent with the existing .residential and
specifically the petitioner's property directly to the east of the subject property. 1
(Institutional) Zoning, because of the broad range of permitted and conditional
uses may not, be consistent with the area.
4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment;
Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment.
5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the
proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities,
including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water
supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency
medical facilities;
The intended` use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional
demands on any public facilities in this area. Any development will need to
demonstrate that there are adequate public facilities in the area to support such
development. \
R- Whether and the extent to which the ro nand amendment would resultin
8.
p p
significant adverse impacts on the, natural environment;
The proposed amendment is' not. anticipated to create adverse, impacts on the.
natural environment. Any future development of this. site will be required to
comply with all state and local environmental regulations. The site is currently
pine flatwoods. Preservation issues will be addressed as a part of any site plan,
which may be filed.
Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment -would result in
an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any
negative affects of such patterns;
The proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development
pattern. The intended use of the property is in conjunction with the existing
church facility to the east.
Whether the proposed' amendment would be in conflict with the public
interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code;
4
u YrR
oms wME
:.
f f
z� (�:
Holy Family
A 9.584
35,505' `
8.4 % -
166,658
621,777
41;644
228
Catholic
(9.705)
(64,637)
Church
St. Peters
18.79
27,064"`
9.04 %
76,946
222,213 ,
55,553
166
Lutheran`,
(6.87)
Church
Liberty
3.9
211174
17.48 %
57,859
112,373
14,465
41
Baptist
(2.78)
Church
Apostle Faith
2.3
11,717
11.7 %
29,446
68,999
7,362 ,
35
Church of
(2:3)
Deliverance
Lakewood
5.61
16,846
12.05 %
41,936
98,064
10,484 .
74
Park United
(3:21)
Methodist
Church
First
8.12
5,200
6.00 %
22,800
333,520
5,700
63
Presbyterian
(2)
Church
Church of the,
8.47
35,1 98
9.54 %
106996
261,956
288
Redeemer
165489
I. Pro'ected '
-
1 Includes all building, concrete, and paved parking areas.
2 Includes all open space, landscape, drainage retention, and grass parking areas.
3 Calculated at26% of Pervious Area for comparative purposes.
4 Estimate based on an average of the 9 listed existing/approved church facilities:
As can be, seen by this chart, the average "Lot Coverage by Buildings as a Percentage" for the 9
listed projects is 9.54 %. When this percentage is applied to the. size of the subject property
(8.47 acres); a total of 35,198 square feet, of building space for any proposed church facility on
the subject property is extrapolated. '
"Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of,
review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is
not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive
Plan. Staff is, however, recommending that ;you forward this petition to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation -of denial for the Institutional Zoning District and instead
recommending that this Board forward a recommendation of approval to the RF (Religious
Facilities) Zoning District.
Please contact this office if you have any, questions on this matter.
Attachment
hf
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Susan Varn, Church of the Redeemer
File
i
Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested change in zoning.
MOTION TO APPROVE:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE
APPLICATION OF CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FOR A CHANGE
IN ZONING FROM THE RS-3 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY — 3 DU/ACRE) ZONING
DISTRICT TO THE I (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE ....
[CITE REASON[S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
MOTION TO DENY:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF CHURCH
OF THE REDEEMER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RS-
3 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY — 3 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE I
(INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE....
[CITE REASON[S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
w
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
RS-3 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 3
1. Purpose
The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for single-family
dwellings at a maximum density of three (3) dwelling units per gross acre, together with such other
uses as may be necessary for and compatible with low density residential surroundings. The number
in "()" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section
3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further
defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code.
2. Permitted Uses
a. Family day care homes. (999)
b. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of
one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that
the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies
the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed
by HRS. (%9)
C. Single-family detached dwellings. (ems)
3. Lot Size Requirements
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4. Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be, in accordance with Section 7..04.00.
5. Off-street Parking Requirements
Off-street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00.
6. Conditional Uses
a. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another such
family residential home. (m)
b. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (M)
7. Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00.
L
Adopted August 1, 1990 106 Revised Through 08/01/00
r
'- J r .. ._ -- _ _ _ _.
E1
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
h. Fairgrounds. (ees)
i. Funeral and crematory services. (72e)
j. Theaters. (ens)
k. Medical and other health services. (eo)
I. Postal service. (43)
M. Residential care facilities for serious or habitual juvenile offenders. (ees)
n. Social services (ea)
o. Sporting and recreational camps (7032)
p. Stadiums, arenas, race tracks (7ea)
q. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (ees)
Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
Drinking places (alcoholic beverages related to civic, social, and fraternal uses). (ens)
Restaurants. (including the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption only.)
(99e)
Funeral and crematory services. (72e)
Heliport landing/takeoff pads. (ens)
Detached single-family dwelling unit or mobile home, for on -site security purposes. (eas)
Residence halls or dormitories. (see)
L
Adopted August 1, 1990 133 Revised Through 08/01/00
F # 3.ww
Section 3.01.03
V'`.,
Zornng District Use kegulations
t
�' 1
" Y.
RF RELIGIOUS FACILITIES "
VA
�
;
1.
Purpose
za}
The purpose of this District is to provide and protect_;an environment suitable for the.e =taflishment
and operation.of churches, synagogues terimples .and sitnilar uses: The number it "O" following each
identified ,use"corre'spopds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3 Q1:02(B). The number.
.,
999 applies to. a use not. defined under the"SIC code but may, be further.defiried in'Sectian 2.00:00 ,
}
oft his code:
t
jF
2.
Permitted, -Uses
a.' `' Churches, synagogues; temples, and similar uses. sssi ,
3.
Lot. Size Requirements '
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance :with Section 7.04.60`
4 - ;
Dimensional Regulations
pi
Dimensional requirements shalt be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
5.
.Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements
?
t
Off=street'parking and loading requirements are aubject.to Section 7.06.00:
6.
Landscaping Requirements..
LandscapiPik
ng requirements are subject to Section 7.00.00.
7.
Conditional "Uses`
a..' Day care facilities, associated and, operated'. by the principal religious "use located on; that
property` This'would indUde.the operation of a day care facility during the normal,business
week, as licensed: by the State of .Florida; as .well .as during any religious function or
associated activity. ter
b. Educational services, associated with and "operatedrby the principal religious use located on
that property. This would include the. operation of an educational facility providing general
;academic and/or special training from grades K to 12 and as licensed by the State of Florida.
Ogg,t
c. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.'10.23 ts9sr
8.
Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and"include the following:
a. Parking "lots, & parking areas, together With related circulation elements.
b. Enclosed storage structures,
c, Piaygrounds and athletic fields (no •artificlal lights) provided that no activity area shall be
- permitted within twenty-five (25) feet of tho perimeter of the property.
Adopted August 1, 1990 134 Revised Through 08/01/010
L
f
{\ 4
ection 3.01 03
SVft
Zoning Distract Use Regulations'}
d , Private water and sewage utility services Proytdetl' #hat they are fob the sole"usa of the-
tld�easu�ree,almnpaicurpnvatedevelopnertf, are hntetled tdonot`
involve iindusfnal, Wbst$water as defined
e Single family dwelling (detached or as, part of the pnnclpal struct ire)
, r
; x
(1) Pnvate swimming pool accessory ko tho single family dwelling 'proVid'ed that,°the;
, y`
swimrnig pog15 shall be Waiied or fegced to prevent uriconttolled access to such
swlmrning,pool from titb.street or -from adjacent properties
O Non-coMmerpiat garages accessory to the'stn`gleifamlly dwelling.
{
3
_
r
'
f r S
([(E/
i
.
I
r
Ait
v
V
1 N
Adopted August`1. 1990 135 Revised Through 08/01/00
N
9
z
0
U
Z
F-
Q
A Petition of Church of the Redeemer of St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from
RS-3 (Residential, Single Family-3 units/acre) to I (Institutional).
i
�
1
j
1
1
m
n
i
t - -
ottTwoo(
r
9
6
4
5
--,C Oak
8� r
_
p
\ Fl !Mn n11 f"(IW(11 U-IN 1\VVV
RZ 0 2-014
This pattern indicates
subject parcel
Z��/z
PJA
Map prepared July 2, 2002
mu n%V rm been comgkd t« QwwW ptwmV w reference POOP— OW
VWhM stay effod f az been mwe to wwC16 as moat wren( end ao ge f
Momnoon Po9eLte. i fo not ktanded W use to a %90t bi.F g doWnme.
o
o
u
o
{
v
\ f
' I
b
oll ,y•wooi
9
U
LJ
e
4
S
CV
a Ur
3
p
RZ 02-014
This pattern indicates
subject parcel
if 11-�
Map prepared July 2, 2002
n. � h. b— 1. Oa��w m«�e�we P�. Pq P— -W
m:Ie v eff t h..mace t. W.4de ft oos —.t —.W
ift-W n PessNe, 4 a not PtmWed W use - a legally bh& V d—* N
w7
RS
RS
RZ 02--014
This pattern indicates
subject parcel
Map prepared July 2, 2002
kO--.b , ao.Re.xe pan ncs d f« .. a I gaW oralw am.mr.
HI
$ c. VD-M
pp2
i S
1
yr j'
I\.
HOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
August 5, 2002
'COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that CHURCH
OF THE REDEEMER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in
Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single -Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional)
Zoning District for the following described property:
Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Selvitz Road and Edwards Road.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
The first public hearing on the petition will be held at 7.•00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on
Thursday, August 15, 2002, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building
Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to
be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered.
Written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission should be received by the County Planning
Division at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual Planning and Zoning Commission and County
Commission on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or
provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to
appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at
such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying
during a hearing will be swom in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-
examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing
may be continued to a date -certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above -described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call 7721462-1582 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number RZ-02-014.
Sincerely,
ST. UCIE COUNT
Y PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Stefan Klatthes, Chairman
JOHN D. 4RUHN, District No. 1 • DOUG COWARD, District No. 2 • PAULA A. LEWIS, District No. 3 • FRANNIE HUTCHINSON. District No. 4 • CLIFF BARNES, District No. 5
County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue • Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 • Planning: (772) 462-2822 GI5/Technical Services: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 • Fax: (772) 462-2132
www.co.st-lucie.fl.us
N
N
l-
O
N
N
N
00
N
h
O
N
N
M_
N
0,
M
M
M
M
M
M
V
M
O
O
DD
M
cn
M
cn
U1
0
N
•-•�
N_
V'
'cr
1-
O
l-
O
i-
O
h
O
00
O
N
ON
O
N
N
r)
ON
N
h
�7'
vl
Vi'
!`
•--.
vl
cf'
oo
N
N
00
IA
'T
N
W)
00
N
�
M
vl
�'
h.
h
W,
,z
O
O\
W)
ckn
Mtn
to
why
t-
to
cW))
h
W)
p�
�.
l�
h
N
%D
NS
M
cVf'1
aOCADo\
1
r
00
cTo,rn
M
1
N
0000ON�
rnrn0,rn
00
00
N
ONON0�
rnrnrnoN
-
00
00
�.�0ONONC\a,a,000ONON
0�
rO
rnrnrnrnrno)rnrnrnrn
00
00
00
00
00
00
rnaoNrnrn
00
N
00
t-
rn
N
V'
M
IT
M
N
M
�h
M
IT
M
tt
M
V
cn
'I-
M
[t
M
�t
M
V
M
IT
M
V'
I M
M
M
V'
M
V'
M
V'
M
V
M
'V'
M
V'
M
V'
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
V'
en
V'
M
2,aja
a
a
U
ala
a
ala�a,aia�a;a
a+a�a,a
a
s
a'a;a
a!a
1
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
j
01
O
U!
N
0
0
0
Ulu � N'
=ce ���
Nj
0
O
N
;
0
N
0
N
i 0
OI
0
N:
0
0
0
N
0
0
0
0
0
a
a
a
a�a
a
�n�alaja
0.
ala
'0
w
a
w
a
a.
a
a.
a
a
a
.-
y
^"
p
0
o
U
0
ww>wUwwwaw�w�ww1_w�ww�wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwaw
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�s
0
U
�2
'a
x
0
0?
o
o
A
u
a
,4
0
o
o
0
0
0
n
n
n
I
¢
y
.�i
•xi
�!
C�
•.•.
r�r•
a
�.
y
W
'LM7
c0
V1
'C7
�-•
N
'aCa.�7,
cQ
�"
�+
tC
.fir•
xi
py
y
TiknVJ
Rf
��'
=
.-�
.�.
'41
c0
V]
'p
td
Vl
'O
tC
n
V]
TaJ,
cC
w
-0
c�
w
'O
cF0
m
-2
td
p:
{Y•
'�
y
'd
t�
rn
'o
t0
•�
•..
p1
N
er
O
U
z
j
�
y
o
;:
_
�
3
'tl
3
T1
3
wo
00000:
x
ld
O
v)
V]
'Ly
'O
T1
K
v
-0
-0
R7
@
i.
00
00
�
a
k"
W
W
�W
W
OOW
W
W
oW
W
W
W
�/1v]R1w>
0�0
V
"C
00
"
O
O
O
O
N
O,
N_
O
N
O�
O�
0�
O
00
V'
%0
�•
�O
IT
O_
O
O
N
er
O
ON
O
00
O
00
O
M
O
O
(�
O
N_
�O
V
N
�O
O
v)
N
�O
'••�
' +
N
M
fV
N
O
O
W
m
M
�o
t,
a,
ON
%O
ON
O\
00
ON
00
O
O
O
O
�-+
ON
O
O
O
O\
M
M
O
O
M
I
M
N
w
M
O
0�
IIII
M
M
%O
M
G
Cf
M
M
•-+
M
�'
'
1 V'
M
•-+
^�
V'
V
M
'ch
mJ•
C1.
tt
V'
V'
V'
M
M
�'
M
N
%lr
M
�
3
3
�c
00
z
¢
AA
0
N
N
bb
N
�
Co
C
0
U
U
z
•
��
°'cts"'
0
ebb
0
0
co
z
C*
o
a)
c
p
0
�-
O
o
'd
0
�QO'
,
N
O
cd
I
a0i
w
;n
^"
p0
Yr
z
cc�t
1.
Ao
d=
timU
.+C
w
wc7c7xxa�aEa
c¢OV
cCd
C',
�
a
con
�
c
0x
�==
�aa
�bx
Nat
3
0
U
C13
=
W
'L7
'C7
't7
y
U
CC
cCd
p
p
«f
A
V
O
O
'�^
N
td
tC
a
❑
CCL
ict
y
'�^
O
p
c
z
zti¢H�xaac7AAxwxtiv�wrA:;�
t
cd
O•O
a
U
d w
O
1 �i
o
ti
d a
a
w
U
rn
I
o
..
/y� it
/"1 Wbaw
0
•y
H
�
-00
as
�o
at
_
p
yy��
_
a
.4
i
UUUwwwwc7cxxa4�a�ac�v�v�v�v�
oo
Gn
4'+ O
O w
tF
O
�O
O
O
Nt
O
M
O
l-
O
h
O
O
O
O
O
00
O
N
C.
h
O
M
O
00
O
00
O
v)
O
V'
O
O
00
O
N
O
00
O
v')
O
O
O
•ct
O
O
V'
M
O
O
l�
O
O�
O
O�
O
'7
O
O\
O
O\
O
)/1
O
y
O
O
_O
O
O
O
%0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
M
O
O
O
IT
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
_O
Co
O
O
v)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
;.r
.�
�O
O
O
V'
O
O
h
O
O
O
V')
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
M
O
O
V1
O
�O
O
l�
O
O
O
N
O
rM
O
O
N
O
N
O
'7
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
."
�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
'ct
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�
^
~
V'
M
N
M
'tT
M_
M
M
N
M
�t
M
M
N
A
M
N
N
-7
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
V=
^•+
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
V
•••�
V'
M
M
V'
--+
V'
••••�
•-•�
N
N
M
M
'ct
�
�••�
^�
N
N
O
'T
M
N
M
g
M
N
N
O
N
Q`
N
O�
N
O1
N
ON
N
as
N
ON
N
O,
N
O,
N
O1
N
ON
N
O%
_^
O
O
N
O,
N
O�
N
a\
N
0%
•--•
O
'••�
O
N
O�
O
O
^-•
O
N
O,
N
0%
O
O
N
O`
h
O
N
a\
N
O',
ON
� y1
Rf
IC14
CA
N
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
cn
N
N
N
N
en
M
N
en
M
en
N
N
M
rM
N
N
1q,
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
E'1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0
a
tri
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
h
h
h
H
is
I
IT
00
.r
bb
90
00
N
M
M
M
M
aa;aa
0
'lt�r.t:t
aaa.a
U
u.www
a
x.ux
d
o
0
0
W
00
8f
z
z
0
a c
.cjV
d
�
v1 p
z
W
�
vi
fN/J
VNl
,N
z333
u as
a
d w
(� o
o. V
a�
A 4°
O
E7 RN
In
CA
v
z
N333
�
C w
o
C.
h
o
a
<D
C)
,
o000
N
M
en
M
NN
Cl)
N
{ y
-N
N
N
N
NNITN
l
cq
0
fir'.
a
ST LUCIE COUNTY.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION" ' \
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA s
August 15, 2002;.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given in accordance, with Section
1 1.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code
and the provisions of the St; Lucie County Comprehensive
Plan, the following applicants have requested' that. the St.
Lucie County Planning and. Zoning Commissionconsider
their following requests: -
I.CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY,I
for a Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single -
Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutlonal)
Zoning District for the following described property:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH; RANGE 40,EAST,1
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS ROAD RIGHT -ON
WAYS AND FURTHER LESS THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE'
SOUTH 210 FEET.
Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Selvitz I
Road and Edwards Road.
2. TIMOTFIYAND DEBRA ROSE CAR WASH, for a Condf-
tional Use Permit to allow the operation of a car, wash
facility in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoningbis-
kict for the following described property:
LOTS I & 12, BLOCK: 169, CAKEWOOD PARK, :UNIT
12A, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 35,-PUB-
LIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY; FLORIDA`
Location; 5321 Sunshine State Parkway /. Turnpike Feeder
Road.
3. GLASSMAN-HOLDINGS, INC., for a Change In Zoning
from the AGA (Agricultural - I;du/acre).Zoning Diskfct to
the CG (Commercial, General Zoning District for the fol-
lowing described: property:
IN SECTION- 13z :TOWNSHIP_ 34, . RANGE � 39, THE
SOUTH 830 •OF:,THE EA$T 1550' OF.: THE SOUTH.4A
OF "NORTHEASP7/4 LESS EAST 80`FT .AND LESS
SOUTH 60 FL',FOR ROAD: AND CANAL
3484 874)
Location: Northwest corner` of thw lntersecfrost off Indrfo -
Road cind Emerson Avenue..
4. WYNNE RANCH for-c-Change in':.iaWd g-1`rom.the
AG-5 (Agriwiroral..,- l du/5-acres). Zoning Dishtcf to, (he p
(Utllities)' Zonmg -District for' the following described
propeify.
„ A: PARCEL. 0F•LAND •LYING IN THE.SOUIHEAST :ONE
QUARTER (1 /4) OFrSEC-TION 5; TOWNSHIP .35--.SOUTH,.
RANGE 37iA$x $T LUCIEAbUXTY;;FLCWDA AND{
COMMENCE ATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
_SECTION 5 THENCE SOUTH 87°5745" WEST, AS -A
-BASIS OF BEARINGS,'AL'ONG THE'SOUTH UNF E�O
SAID SECTIONS; A DISTANCE OF 2672.00 FEET40
THE SOUTHWEST"-CORNER'OF SAID:SOUTHEAST ONE
QUARTER (1/4)_ OF:.SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH
00°27'15 EAST. ALONG THE WEST: LINE "OF:,SAID,
,$OUTHWEST.ONE QUARTER.(1./4) OF SECTION'.5;'A
;, DISTANCE OF 1894.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGI(4-
NING; THENCE CONTINUE 'NORTH.'00°27I5 -EAST
ALONG SAID WEST UNE,. A DISTANCE OF.656.70
FEET; THENCE,SOUTH 89°19'16" .EAST, DEPARTING
SAID. WEST, LINE, A DISTANCE OF . 656.70 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°2715" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
656.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°19'16 WEST; A DIS-
TANCE OF 656.70: FEET..TO-THE 'POINT :OF
BEGINNING:.
SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT- FOR INGRESS AND
EGRESS AND. PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE OVER
THE WEST 25 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINING 9,900 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Location. " North side of Orange Avenue, approximately
5.75 miles west of.Mmute Maid Road.
5. WYNNE RANCH, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of an Air Curtain Incinerator in the U (UtIh
ties) Zoning District for the following described property:- -
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE
QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH,
RANGE 37 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA'AND
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID :
SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 87°57'45" WEST, AS A
BASIS OF BEARINGS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 2672.00 FEET TO
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE
QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH
00°27'15" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 5, A
DISTANCE OF 1894.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN-
NING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00°27'15" EAST
ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 656.70
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°19'16" EAST, DEPARTING
SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 656.70 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00'27'15", WEST, A DISTANCE OF
656.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°19'16" WEST, A DIS-
TANCE OF. 656.70 FEET" TO THE POINT OF "
BEGINNING.
SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS. AND
EGRESS AND PUBLIC.UTILITY AND DRAINAGE OVER
THE WEST 25 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINING 9,900 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. "
Location:' North side of Orange Avenue; approximately.."
:5.75 miles west of Minute Maid Road. .
•6. FLORIDA CENTER FOR, RECOVERY,;INC".fora. Condi-
tional Use Permit to allowSocial Services and Health Care
Facilities.in the I (Instihd'ronalf=Zoning District for-iha fol-
lowing descnbedlpropech^
WHITE CITY S/D 05°3640" BEGAT NW.COR OF LOT
100 RUN E::135 FT TH . 135 FT, -H N TO P-OBAESSRD
AND CANAL RM.— (1.72 AC) (MAP 34/05S) (OR
1524-2594)
C7
WHITE .CITY S/D:A5°3640 THAT PART ,OF LOT' J06. 0j
LYG E OF DRAINAGE CANAL #103 -LESS THAT PART x
LYG N OF DRAINKGE CANAL•:#l03 AND: NA30 FT
- OF: LOTS "-112-:AND.I 19 LYG E'OF DRAINAGE -CANAL
#103 AND ALL"OF LOT _107*.-`LESS .RD,AND CANAL i
R/W— (10.45 AC) j)v1AP.34/05S) (OR 1524-2594) .
Location: 3451 Wesf Micly ay Road
PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held -in Commission ChaMbars •0
Roger:Polkas Annex,,2300 Virginia.Avenye, Fort .Pierce, _ =
Florida on August 15,2002 beginning at 7.00 P.M or as
soon thereafter as possible .. )"
PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105 Florida Statutes, if a� C; .-
person.decides'to appeal any" decision made.by a board 44
.agency; or commission with respect.to ariy:mattet=coiisid r !"
ered"at.o meeting.or hearing,.he will treed d record of thei (=,''
proceedings,and that; for such' purposes."he may need•to
ensure that
verbatim record of the.proceedingz is
made
1 which record includes the testimony and ewdence upoh c
I whfchthe appea!•is-to be based..
` r{
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA -.
/S/ Stefan McMhes, CHAIRMAN
Publish: August l; 2002
2487476
V-I—f LVVL lr.— --i ia.r..rvar
i -!AJ
-Al r-41
August 13, 2002
W. Cincy Snay
St. Lucie County Plaiatting
2;00 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
MOSBY AND ,ASSOCIATES, INC.
&~ 4
Subject: Tim Rose Car Wash
CU-02-001 and MN-SP-02-004
St. Lucie County, Florida
Engineer's. Project Number: 01-235
Dear Mc. Snay:
245514th Avenue
Post Office BOX 6368
Vero BeaO, Florida 32981-5368
Telephone: 772-569.0035 - Fecaimile- 772-778.3617
Via Facsimile
As discussed on the teleP,ltone, time -are requesting that the subject project be postpoln-Cd uritll the
September 19, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting so that we can address and
resolve the issues raised in the Staff report dated August 15, 2002.
We understand that once you review the report you will contact this office so that we can
schedule a tkne to meet and discuss the Staff's concerns.
Shou
o have ny questions regarding the above subject, please call.
Y � N
P
cc: Mr. Tim Rose
Mr. Bruce 6arkett
. f "
t
PLANNING AND: ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 7/18/02
Cps
File Number CU-02-,001 and MNSP-02-004
�GAb
c�<
IVIEIVIORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF. COSY DEVELOPMENT
TO:
Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM:
Community Development, Director
DATE:
July, 10, 2002
SUBJECT:
Application of Timothy Rose, for a Conditional Use Permit and minor site
plan. to allow the construction of a 2,542 square.foot self-service car wash
facility, to be known as Rose Car Wash in the CN (Commercial,
Neighborhood) Zoning District.
LOCATION:
5321' Sunshine State ..Parkway (Turnpike Feeder Road).
West side of the Sunshine State Parkway/Turnpike Feeder
Road, approximately 600 feet north, of the intersection of
Sunshine State Parkway and Winter Garden Parkway.
ZONING DESIGNATION: CN (Commercial, `Neighborhood)
LAND USE DESIGNATION: RU (Residential Urban)
PARCEL SIZE:_
0.74 acres
PROPOSED USE:
'The construction of. a 2,542 square foot self-service car wash'
facility.
. SURROUNDING ZONING: ' To the north is RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre)
and l (Institutional) Zoning; to the south is CN (Commercial
Neighborhood) Zoning; to the east is RS-4 (Residential,
Single -Family .— 4 du/acre) and CN (Commercial
Neighborhood) Zoning and tothe west is RM-5 (Residential,
Multiple -Family 5:du/6cre) Zoning.
SURROUNDING LAND USES: RU (Residential Urban) and `P/F (Public/Facilities). to the
north, RU (Residential. Urban) to south, east and west.
FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #7 ' (49Q0 'Ft. Pierce Boulevard) is located
approximately one and one-half (1 1/2) miles to the west.
UTILITY SERVICE:.
Onsite water and septicsewer.system. At the time that sewer
services are brought into this area (currently, projected to be
It
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
Q. CN COMMERCIAL, NEIGHBORHOOD
Purpose
The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for limited retail trade
and service activities covering a relatively small area and that is intended to serve the population
living in surrounding neighborhoods. The number in "()" following each identified use corresponds
to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not
defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code.
2. Permitted Uses
a. Beauty and barber services. (723n24)
b. Civic, social and fraternal associations (8641)
C. Depository institutions (so)
d. Laundering and drycleaning (self-service). (7215)
e. Real estate (se)
f. Repair services:
(1) Electrical repair. (762)
(2) Shoe repairs (725)
(3) Watch, clock, jewelry, and musical instrument repair. (7631)
g. Retail trade (each building shall be less than 6,000 square feet gross floor area, all uses
inclusive):
(1) Antiques (5932)
(2) Apparel and accessories. (se)
(3) Books and stationery. (s9421 m)
(4) Cameras and photographic supplies. (s948)
(5) Drugs and proprietary. (5912)
(6) Eating places (5812)
(7) Florists. (5992)
(8) Food stores tso
(9) Gifts, novelties, and souvenirs. (5947)
(10) Hobby, toy and game shops (5945)
(11) Household appliances (m)
(12) Jewelry. (s944)
(13) Newspapers and magazines. (5994)
(14) Optical goods. (5995)
(15) Nurseries, lawn and garden supplies. (528)
(16) Radios, TV's, consumer electronics and music supplies (573)
(17) Sporting goods and bicycles. (5941)
(18) Tobacco products. (5993)
h. Video tape rental (784)
Lot Size Requirements
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4. Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
Adopted August 1, 1990 114 Revised Through 08/01/00
�
{ t
T
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
5. Off<street Parking and Loading Requirements
Off-street: parking' and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00.
6. :Landscaping Requirements
Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.:
T. Conditional Uses
a. Car Washes (Self Service Only) - subject to the provisions of Section 7.10.22. (999)
~: b. Day care - adult (8322)
-. child (051)
C. Postal services. (4311)
d. Retail trade:
(1.): Gasoline services - accessory to retail food stores under SIC-5411. case)
(2) Undistilled alcoholic beverages accessory to retail sale of food. (5921-cev1 for iiyu«)
e. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999)
8. Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.06.00 and include the following:
a. Drinking places (undistilled alcoholic beverages) accessory to..an eating place. tsss>
b. One tlw (ling unit contained within the commercial building, for on -site security purposes. (999)
Adopted August 1, 1990 115 . Revised Through 08/01/00
I
i
CO
O,
rr
i
L
r
ON
N
8
N
u)
O
Q
N'
1s
N
'1£
0.
n
K
a
t�
5
tr
O
P
o
O
c
¢
9
3A
rr
NWtl
��
as
PARK
t'
ap
T
Otl
�
r $
7 �9'
ai
San
AN
tJl
W
mi
<
'yr
W
M
Q
ad VIA
K
�
rou
rr
Y.
ar�n
0
oroa R1MY3089
Z
U
Z)
orou NWK
mod 3rat 30NM
0
U
Uaroa
"
Z�
�
'
arou tvxr� uaav3x
�
._I
'
La
z
W
t
Otl �10N 1r301
F,
Q
g
aroa a33Ni
orou Noatur�
¢
a:
KJ 1"m
Z
A
i
apt
H
�I
g
dr
K
S
K 1
S S£ 1
S K 1
1dNnoo
338OH033�10
�
o,
A Petition of Timothy and Debra Rose Car Wash for a Conditional Use Permit
and Minor Site Plan for a car wash facility.
21
22
20
/9
17
19
/6
15
13
/4
12
/1
9
10
8
7
5
6
4
3
I
2
NK_®
24 23
2/ 22
20 /9
O 18
16 15
13 /4
12 !/
9 p
8 7
5 6
4 J-
1 2
Eden Rood
CU 02-001
This pattern indicates
subject parcel
21 22
20 19
O 18
16 15 -
13 /4
12 8
2
9 /0
8 7
>_ a
--- p 1
5 6 364
U
° 36J
4 J 3 G�0 50
°a 362 G�( 274
' 2 w
Q�° J61 275
273
JGO Z16 272
1 ��a 2n zn
559
278 270
357 279 269 O�� 204
280 268 205 i
Q �
356
206 i
355
2& 267
8 207
� 1
262 266 ; I
354 j
7\\ 263 265 206
I
353
284 264 209 j
� 1 -
1
352 � � I t
Q 295 263 210 I j
O
0- W j I
351 266 262 j I
2// 1 I
t�
2 350 267 26l 1 \
1
e 2/2 1 /
349 286 260 1
3 2/J i 1
1 1
348 289 259 % 1
I /
2N I 1
290 258 1 I
3n I
215 �
� 257zn
1
346 �
Map prepared June 25, 2002
TNe map ha been oWVW brpx.xWOWMq and .ebre P./Po V*Y. �l
Mk t-y all h. been made W I —Ad. Cn n anent and —W.
ManblWn p.a 1b —Mended Wr— ee a b9OV b..*V down .
Zoning
Timothy and Debra
Rose
Car Wash
21
22
24
23
25�
2/
22
20
19
21
22
24
23
— —
20
19
n
/e
20
19
21
--
22
n
/8
RM-5
0
3
O
18
2019
— —
,6
15
i
d
16
15
18
O
AS
15
l3
H
c
IJ
`
Q
16
IS
>
Q
13
14
12
1I
0
12
---
11
c
0
—
>'
f2
8
9
10
t�
9
10
c
0
/2
9
9
/0
c
C
O
=
9
p
I
6
7
N
8
7
(n
8
7
Y
8
7
>
5
6
5
6
5
6
5
6
354
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
O
3
36J
G\0
2
!
2
1
2
/
2
CO
o
w
OOd
J62
G
Eden Road
�(
30
276
r ,
0a
2n
12
; Lake .= \\ p
m '''
e s 9\
\
358
9
�c
Q
218 270
��
/3 9
—5 \ \\
'
351
279 269
14
\ 8
\ QD
Q, \ \ \
J56
280
2w
\ 6 \ \
28l
267 806
16
6 \ . \\ J \\ \ G�\� \ 8
5 \\ 2 \ \ \\
354
282
O 4
\ 7
Cp^ 1\\ \ \\ \
O 2\2A a�7 \\ \(`e' \ 6 \\
353
283
265
208
3
a0( yA Cyr \ \ 5 \
(� 20 \ 22 J \\ 4 \
�
\\
284
264
209
2
Qp \
q 2/\
20
N
\ \ J\
\\ \\ 1�
2
352
�
Q
a
265
263
O
210
8 \ 1 \ \\
!7 \ \
351
286
262
W
2/l
\
/6 \ �CJe 2
15 \\ 21 22 Ix U 8 15
350
26f
2/2
287
\ \ N
13 \
\
U \ \ 20
\ 19\ �\ A 1
\ \ p� J
349
288
260
215
n l7 \\\ O spy
34B
289
259
p
9
%
\ 15 !I
to
13
347
290
258
I
2/4 �
\\
8 '\
\ 14
/3 \ 9 �14
\ \ \ Q
346
�
257
2/5
i
1 15
CU 02-001
This pattern indicates
subject parcel
G(S �
Map prepared June 25, 2002 w
Thm mae has b oo VW W ga O M V W4 We— pWDeaea o* j
wNe a " anon hae been made 0 VMde Ne m CYnaC" a We l Y Aomie6an P—kft, 4 b — iverN d 1. — ea a WQ* bi T q eowrw4. f_ �J
_, ,_ Timothv and Debra Rose Car Wash
2/ 22
w /9
2 /8
16 /5
13 /4
/2 /1
9 1
to
8 7
5 6
4 3
:den Rood
y co
o � ago
©m
v®
MEN
CU 02-001
This pattern indicates
subject parcel
12
I!
P/F:
2
9
10
8
7
N
>_
a
5
6
364
O
i
363
-40
4
3
0
G\e
362 G�( 274
2
W
0�
Q-O 36, 275
273
276 272
360
atel
� Z� 359 277 271
/ \
\ 10
358 Oy 278 270
357 279 269 �� 204
t�
eO
356 280
205
\
267
355 28I 1 1
�\� \ 8
262
266
20T
\
554
I
\\ \
283
265
2QB
�
`\\ 5 6 \\
\
353
-'
\
284
264
209
\ \\
4�if7(n1 \
352
N
E85
263
20
1
\
351
O
d
v
W
I
�\ \
266
262
NI
1 �
Z
OCJ 2
350
287
261
1
I
°
J Q' 72
212
1
I i
1
A
349
P8
0
22I/34
i
I
II
1
548
2
22569
jI
13
347
A
258
p
257
215291
�
Map prepared June 25, 2002
1Nc meP 1us D canvkd go( g WWptww*V aM zebra puWaaa or#, �l
WHe .non tm t*w aa u prowWo ft n M aM a We
iJ� po t*.4 u n WY dW for l u a MQWty CrcW q O�.
� YAW
� g'8•" a ,g �" � �!. � �5 ^w� e— . f yt+ 1x t �..,y, s � Y :i S�"+7!
as c
!a
-
�{
�.> � � 9�'� f �1� �. it,i l 4. �.'' �� f �y �i r9' 'a`i�*d °�,,,x r ku� at�� d 1 k �"x v�f3^-'_ i •-x`"�} 1 .. =�'x
�'- >a 1 ., pp s,X T e � � x �i •� (. ,� ,d � --. �`f, x� -I'S, 4t,
- •t �xq t ". d i �'L t,I - �' �' i.',. �u to i'• "`q' 3 �. z' `. § ,.�3
} z t f�Ttj ry r
�g5 P 5��,,
a i+.+..r>.�
rWy!i,s., ,, d�� w��r :• t -�,� �'�-, r .� `q
@ S�� rl f srsiV �. ) x tp. ,S w,yt �
r y� d : 2 a k Z ,
g ' q�
�' "` b �' � � F d-`" •� 1 {, i ' �`y�i5ua`�" q� , J� 't � s dam 5 a � " �� q � � � � � r =� xp„ � J a }' �<• � �r^'x a� � �.a�-� ,(,w'� � j�. )a. .Jl s: g`sa m �:. �'�'t 't_p a` d � �+• ,J�: v� '` •'
S-
`ahP ar j, M�,.,. ""� t }) E..... �� b ,.�F3f �31 g �3{ -y L• Y �` a'i.,1 5 x�
lo
as i 'uc
Lk 41
,��
iiAMv a
'
e
,f a � � d � s �. 4 � �• a �. _ .;.. i .. a `'>19 ����J .c�� �,_� � ��, ` ,�� `
.
f , l -� � 9 ## e - t � � eJ = ,, tat, ,•�"d o� .. ,PV qt i�h ,.�3�s o � �..".
� � a .vim. ,✓� m"a` r� '` ,- •.
'
--,�,ai � i e � Z �l
� xn � ka �,�` a��, `� s � � � � • ����� � r +f _� � a � ->.'^r � d j ,x<-� V 'mac r� f ��
} a -
'
qj
svy
��.-r -a°•a �g e d ` ��� C vk
b,,
y �b6 §"ram ✓i@$�11 ., L -�� �'y� �# f
Vv
ng
�! >.- v ,w hs' � � ,� � �� g d F A � � r � Sv a � � �7i� ,4 x. � • K i' -.1 � .+ � #e z? ��} °�
P �8
x •may. � � � v � y`' � s ;* � +�. E #� � t � ' } � "`A"s`� � k � .
J ;; �•, 1.}a° - /-` p, a`'c�,, ° Ems. 'r' s e a zi _ J.+'` r } x t• 7t„ i-
4'• 'd a. _ , b s a.�, Yarn x �
z\ psaSr -o-t "" " � 3 : �. <. � +y p-'`�k' •�',�• z� p � � a r``e.,...
G- a-� n. i Y»ti.'�t
s �� 4 J�
RN
t Y ,s 1 gd' i v✓ 'ss` Ja 4
�p 4.#�,y •'��� J?�� � �t ✓ z � � �A'w�s. vy�� °��'2 �. h'r� >Y "- � � �� xax. s� s ..,A `.c' .' 'Y$ �',� it
vw-°'a
AGENDA - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
THURSDAY, August 15, 2002
TIMOTHY AND DEBRA ROSE CAR WASH, has petitioned St. Lucie County for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a car wash facility in the CN (Commercial,
Neighborhood) Zoning District for the following described property:
Location: 5321 Sunshine State Parkway / Turnpike Feeder Road..
Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically
recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with
respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the
proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is
to be based Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing
will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any
individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the
public hearing will also be considered.
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners
August 5, 2002. Legal notice was published in The News and The Tribune, newspapers of general
circulation in St. Lucie County, on August 1, 2002.
File No. CU-02-001
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
August 5, 2002
JL�Ei CMG
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
�OR10P
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that TIMOTHY
AND DEBRA ROSE CAR WASH, has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Conditional Use Permit to allow
the operation of a car wash facility in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District for the
following described property:
Location: 5321 Sunshine State Parkway / Turnpike Feeder Road.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
The first public hearing on the petition will be held at 7.00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on
Thursday, August 15, 2002, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building
Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to
be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered.
Written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission should be received by the County Planning
Division at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual Planning and Zoning Commission and County
Commission on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or
provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to
appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at
such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based. Upon the.request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying
during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-
examine any individual testifying during a hearing'upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing
may be continued to a date -certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above -described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call 7721462-1960 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number CU-02-001.
Sincerely,
ST. L CIE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Stefan atthes, Chairman
JOHN D. BRUHN. District No. 1 • DOUG COWARD. District No. 2 • PAULA A. LEWIS. District No. 3 • FRANNIE HUTCHINSON. District No. 4 • CLIFF BARNES. District No. 5
County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue • Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 • Planning: (772) 462-2822 GIS/Technical Services: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 • Fox: (772) 462-2132
www.co.st-lucie.fl.us
` ST. LUCIE COUNTY (77
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes To allow the operation of a car wash facility in the CN (Commercial,
the Following Neighborhood) Zoning District.
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At: 5321 Sunshine State Parkway / Turnpike Feeder Road.
Currently Zoned: CN (Commercial, Neighborhood)
Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
Date:
Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CU-02-001 Timothy & Debra Rose Car Wash)
. O
p
h
0
h
00
h
h
C.
b
00
h.
w
M
IT
Q\
h
0
CDr
N
V'1
b
N
ON
a,M
b
o0
V
M
O
M
en
to
CD
M
-It
N
to
tM
00
O\
O
b
00
M
O
Itr
o
0
0
It
0
IT'a
C.
I
^
r
b
h
M
'n
O\
M
o
O
b
M
N
M
0
M
.r
h'
M
(Sr
N
.�
V1
.•..
N
.�
N
M
N
.-•
V
t't
N
•--
00
O�
N
N
.a
T
N
.-�
y�
Q\
N
.�
N
.•-�
N
.:
Vl
N
N
.-.
to
M
vl
M
vl
M
h
M
h
t7
rn
M
T
N
N
-
h
.-.
°�
^
'V
N
(�
rn
o\
vl
o.
vl
o\
b
rn
h
o\
h�
rn
rn
r
rn
O
h
r
'^
h
rn
r
M
h
rn
h
°.
h
m
o0
oN
rn
m
h
o,
b
rn
b
T
b
°.
b
0�
b
ON
b
0\
M
M
h
a,
h
o0
O\
h
O\
b
O
rn
o\
r
M
rn
o,
r
M
r
M
r
M
N
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r^
M
-
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
r
en
r
M
r
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
r
M
r
M
r
M
N
-
r
M
r
M
`•°
aaaaaaaa�aaaaaaaaa
aaaaaa
>>'�
as
.aaZaaa
v�wwwwwwwwzwwwwwwwww
wwwwww
zz
wwzwwzwww
u�
d
c"Ci
u
u
c�i
a
c�i
i`
u
aa'a"w'a'rnaa
�aaaaaaaaa
°
0
°
°
°
;r
°
°
°
ooPow�row
°
Q
ti
y
pa.
°v,a
0A.A.A.
'
C
Z
C°~
n
C
C
C
C
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
C
C
C
U
0
wwu.>P.P.wwoowwwwu.P.P
0
0
^�
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
uP
0
w
»»»
Wrn
awaLa
wUwww
I
�,i,I
r
Ij
III
v
0
U
>>
G
U
o
P.
oC
oo
o
>
w4:
°C°
_
o
coGGf
-E
cCe7
.5
wc>
aN
a°ppN
C
N
•"
E
E
^�
-C
N
at
to
¢
¢
Q
¢
¢
¢33
a
bl
a�
►,
r
cn�x
v,wUa
v,w
�o
P.
owrna
rn3a
z_zzzzz
a
aw
�(n
N
h
N
V)
M
h
M
v)
M
0
ai
h
O
O
N
O
O
Vn
O
M
-
M
—
M
-
M
-
M
•--•
M
N
00
W
00
In
-
O
C7
r
"
b
O
�,
�+
o,
0
0^
O
O
O
O
�l
O
-
N
r
N
O
r
r
M
M
M
M
O
M
r
r
N
h
V
M
h
h
h
h
h
h
W
r
ON
00
r
o
M
M
M
Q
btob
C4
N
rn
Wn
01
vih0.hhh
Nvlh
V
V
r
V
V
r
NN
°�Nr
Nh
Nhhh
°bbbbb
04
O
a
U
U
U
U
U
V
z
w�aaaa
•o
•O
.o
.i"
G
m
C
0
z
PQ
z
�
U
b
o
0
0
0
0
'•'
��
U
a>
A
°°'
w
�
to
licg
Arne
z
v�ixaw
Ci
a�wwwww
U
o
en
•g
d
o
C
p
O
O
y
CIE
y
m
G•§
y
•�
£�..x
g
z
UA
R
AA
¢or
C7
zzzzz
c7
�xx
a
y
u
>
N
y
N
A
x
w
z
¢¢¢¢¢¢
w
¢
3•°
a
L.
y
0
v
o
c
¢<
-,
cs
°
a:w
wua>d�d
v¢��w
Lbw
CO
>°
�
�'
o
to h
O
C
O
O
'°^'
#
D?
N
0
•N
N
C
o
z
¢P;P:tgwP:A>.,.,rAa�nw
UO
wwwwww
AA
AxaH
Qa:A
¢
0
N
two
1
PL
C
0
0.
y
E
°
°°
an
0
.
d
�
_
o
i
i
E
E
E
6�
cd
z
-IC
mAPQ
uAAAAAAwww�C7C7
C7C7C7C7C7C7
C7C7
00C)axx
I
o
M
°\
-
M
�n
°1
N
b
o,
-
^
N
00
b
^
oo
N
M
to
00
o0
rr
N
M
o�
N
h
h
N
�--�
v�
b
_
V
b
tT
_
c�
O
_
N
N
b
h
N
N
N
b
O
M
b
o
v1
V
'n
V
eD
"
O
T
N
h
h
V
O
M
iL
,y d
i.
h
01
N
�°
M
N
h
D\
O�
—
°�
N�
�°
^
N
o�
r,
O
r
N
N
N
b
h
M
N
O
h
M
N
o1
�n
N
h
—
N
r
N
N—
C
O
0
h
N
�°
b
N
b
C.
—
O_
b
r
M
h
[�
00
O
O
N
h
tn
O
en
b
N
N
T
M
o\
O�
I
oo
0\
M
rn
N
—
N
O
00
N
00
N
00
N
N
O
r—
N
n
C.
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
0
6
O
O
O
O
O
—
6
6
O
O
M
—
O
N
b
O
O
O
O
O
o
N
'
O
•[
y
•� O
r
N
O
•7
M
h
M'
I
M
N
°\
N
O
-
M
M
M
O,
1 -
V1
r
00
N
M
O
O
N
M
M
�O
O
o0
N-
0
V
b
h
r
r
N
h
N
M
M
N
°�
V7
N
h
T
100
W
O
b0
b
N
O!
h
0o
M
N
O
rn
°4
0
O
00
h^
Q\
-
N-
00
N
O
O
N
N
O
O
N
N
'�
O
':
h
O
O
to
O
00
O
�o
0,
—
m
00
h
h
V
M
M
h
h
�p
^
00
o
00
�,Z>lo\
h
0-
O
N
O
r
00
�+
C. Oj
In
N
D
0
0
0
0
0
r
0
0
O
O
O
0
0
N
0
0
0
N
O
M
C
b
O
wn
O
O
O
O
to
O
T
N
•�
O
N
0
0
0
0
0
N
O
N
O
o
O
M
O
O
N
O
O
h
o
00
O
h
O
h
O
N
O
O
N
o
r
0
O
0
M
o
N
O
V)
O
O�
O
N
O
h
o
h
o
M
O
N
O
M
O
b
O
r/'1
O
h
O
r/'1
O
a0
C.
V
O
00
O
00
O
%n
O
N
O
rA
C.
O
O
Cl
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O-
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O-
O
O
N
C.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
O
M
h
b
N
b
b
M
rn
h
00
O
h
O
�n
b
N^
W
^'
h
rn
b
b
O
h
M
M
o
00
.-�
o
N
O,
00
b
b
b-
00
b
rn
O
\O.
O
N
P.
P
r/"I
O
O
00
O
.^
�°
b
M^
O
cc
O
O
0
o
0
0
0
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0-
0
0
CC
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
o
O
O
O
O
O^
O
o
O
0
0
O^
0
0
O
0
O
C
L C
A
r
vrro
nrvo�'o`ro`roc`+'vro
��hhhh
^
^
oor
nr
0000v_'
b
b
b
0
N
b
b
b
w
b
0
b
0
b
m
r
°
00
00
00
00
00b
Aa �Cyt
cis
M
MOMMNM
O
F
O
MK
O
M
M
M
M
M
O.
M
N
O
to
�O
<V
O
h
V
oo
M
h
00
N
..-.
�--�
00
r`
N
O
N
O
N
O
1O
h
00
O
O
O
V
V'
O
'+
00
N
O
N
O
00
ti
4
M
V
h
O
'�1
h
N
O
N
a
M
N
O
V1
M
N
O
N
M
N
M
M
N
O
Vl
O
V1
O
O
Vl
00
�p
M
N
M
N
...
y�
O
V1.
O
w1
M
N
00
�p
01
�.
,...
y�
M
N
M
N
O
O
N
M
N
O
M
M
N
M
N
O
N
O
N
M
N
\
N
;oo�
N
vi
V
N
M
'd'
;�,':
h
Vl
ul
Vl
N
Vl
o.rnrnrnrnrno.rn
h
vl
vl
ul
kO
Vl
vi
Vi
rnrnrn
Vl
h
MO�p�cn
vl
h
a
0%
h
rnM�n"�rno.
h
h
h
H
rnrn
h
rnrnrnrnrnrno�
V
h
h
M
M
M
M
M
M
rn
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
.n
m
to
.M
A
M
'7
M
AV.
M
M
M
M
M
M
<t�
en
aaa.aaa.aa
a.aa
aa:aa
as
as
aaa
as
_
aaa.a.aa..a
v�wwwwwwww
www
wwww
ww
ww
www
ww
wwwwwww
d
N
I �.
U
N
N
N
0
d
N
U
w
o
0
o
N
0
.�
N
N
'N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
y
d
N
N
N
aaaa
is
an.
a.a,a
aaa
a'a
a
Uaaa.
P.
P.
aaaaa'ara'
C
oC
xwwww
wCoow°ww
w
>wu.w
oo°
°
°aw°°
>Uwu.w>t
°O
wwZto:wZ
wC
rCiw
wC°
tCi
uCo
>
>
>
>>
QQ
�a?3A
aUi
a"i
QQ
e"i
a"i
dA
d
C
C
O
C
C
C
C
C
C
'V
oaaa
-C
x'�aaa
-mod
>a
000,
°'>A„�A
L
oaa
{R°�+�f'
a
�Fa
ap
47
C
O
O
Q
O
CN
(�0
^d
.�
O
._.
�d
N
Q
N
l"
N.
Ny
y
N
WA
.-O..
.4:
12
a:
FJ�P.
a
Pi
-CICO,
W
��
A.
en
000C.w
A.op.
P..wwa
b
h
.-+
'O
O
0�
N
O\
m
0\
-n
In
V
v�
..
b
C.
M_
O
Cq
vl
OO
h
O
00000000
O
0\
O
O,
to
QV
h
d'
h
000�00
M
h
In
b
N
h
M
h
'V'
h
O'o
n
V
h
'7
�n
wl
V'
N
C.
V
Vl
'It
Vl
b
M
�n
OO
�n
�n
M
v�
000
N
cn
V
�n
C.
M
-n
�--�
M
v1
'7
N
V'
vl
M
n
00
M
-n
%n
�n
�O
d�+
F
�
x
zin
d
s
�
z
cl
o
�
M
d
�+
3j
CN
a
co
O
N>
U
Za
�g
a
as
aa:rw
v7
5
�3xQ
xx
v
voo
.,yb�
=bb
�
�
��C7C7U
.o�F(Aa
n�aZ
t7P4
Utz
o
c�
d
y
H
d
r
:
p ,(~
I
8
j+
C
O
O
I
I I
"�
?�
3
�,
o
g
g
g
o
o"
c
o
c
o
o
m
d
o
z
��o.w
as
P.
viv,v,
r~
~333
3
d Q
N
00
V
M
N
h
M
h
O
�O
M
m
�O
w
C`
00
N
O\
%O
en
O%
N
h
h
M
..-.
M
\0
O
h
M
O�
10
O,
en
M
N
10
10
N
M
W%
O1
N
O
10
N
M�
ul
O\
00
a
it
O
M
t
v1
fV
O
M
M"
N
N
0
et
O
O
Wl
v
.-1
N
00
v
00
h
n'
i
h
N
V
b
T
N
N
41
O�
N
ao
O
�n
en
N
�+
b
T
y
vi
-
eq
M
v
v1
M
N
o0
O iL
d
by
NNM
MNN
sv,NN\O
N
C>
NNv
C
nNCN
NNv,
NNNO
NON
'. z
h
C
O
C
C
C
C
C
C
G
O
O-
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
C
C
C
O
O
C
C
O
O
IIf
\O
O
� .0.
w+
O
•3
M
h
M
N
n
W
00
M
M
t7
�0
N
M
O
M
M
W
N
O�
N
O'
M
--�
7
%O
Cl
1-
b
N
10
N.
M
H
-n
V
N
�t
V
W
\O
�n
N
M
�O
N
�O
N
DD
N
V'
'C
h
O
h
V
vS
O
M
N
0�0
.�.
CT
(
Vl
V
0%
T
M
b
O
N
O
K
O,00
M
N
O_
-
M>
.O
N
C
N
C
C
M
C
C
G
N
C
C
C
V)
C
O
O
G
N
C
N
O
'7
O
C
"
t�
C
N-
C.
C
N
C
N
C
N
O'
T
0
0
N
0
N
C
C
O
M
C
C
�..
I
O �'+
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
-
O
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
y a+
N
G
O
O
O
O
Opp
0
Oh
0
0
0
O
�-
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Ov
0
O
0
O
0
00
O
O
b
0
0
0
O
N p,,
-
O
O
a,
M
V'
00
N
O
V
V1
a
1n
N
00
M
h
m
000
M
a
O
V
�O
b
�n
a
10
-
O
't
O
N
�_D
M-
�n
a
N
b
00
�O
M
M
Oho
O
�D
00
C)
\O
$_
E
r+
ZM
q
O
CCC_
N
O
V
O
O
O..O_
v
_O
O
_O
O
O
v
O
CC
vvv
O
O
0
O
O
vvi
O
O
O
O_
0
O
vv
0
O
O_
9
O
O
Ct
CC
O
O_
O
-
O
O
vv
O
O
0
O
-
0
O
v
_O
O
_O
O
O
v'v
O
O
O_
,�
OY .'.^�
F,y
N
�D
O
a0
�O
O
00
O
00
C
00
1O
�
%O
�O
�O
�o
�o
O
00
10
10
O
00
V
...
r
�O
�O
O
00
O
0o
%O
10
O
00
�2
O
00
O
00
--
�D
�O
O
W
O
'N-.
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
N
0
0
`�'
.Nr'
O
N+
0
0
^
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
F
Q
M
to
M
M
F
M
Q.
M
M
M
M-
M
M
F
M
M
M
to
to
M
M
cl
N
1.
o
N
�
M
v
a+
v�
w
d
x
UI0
it
I�
I
C
0
V1
O
d
i..
.Y
y
'b
'{y
N
O
h
b
Ri
z
tn
d
C4
z
d
S
cd
z
M
N
Ix
z
N
a
d
�o
z�
�a
CIS�
I
oA
w
c�
�
I
i
to
U� w
yo
z
04
W
ad
o
o p;
�z
o
HQo
N
L�
in
N
L
O
U U
a
++
�,
�. vl
y
o
O
N
i o
AA
ST LUCIE COUNTY' " ei
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA '
August 15, 2002
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given in accordance. with. Section
1 1.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code
and the provisions of the St: Lucie County Comprehensive
Plan, the following applicants have requested that the St.
Lucie County Planning and. Zoning Commission consider
their following requests:
].CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
for a Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single -
Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional)'
Zoning District for the, following described property:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW i/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF+
SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST,i
ST. LUCIE COUNTY; FLORIDA. LESS ROAD RIGHT -OF -I
WAYS AND FURTHER LESS THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE;
SOUTH 210 FEET.
Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Selvitz'
Road and Edwards Road.
2. TIMOTHYAND DEBRA ROSE CAR WASH, for a Condi-
tional Use Permit to allow the operation of a car wash
facility in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning'Dis-
hict for the following described property:
LOTS i l & 12, BLOCK 169, LAKEWOOD PARK,UNIT
12A,'AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 35, PUB-
LIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.'
Location: 5321 Sunshine State Parkway /, Turnpike Feeder
Road. .
3. GLASSMAN.HOLDINGS, INC" fora Change in Zoning
from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to
the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning Districtfor the fol-
lowing described:properly:
IN-SECTION..15,TOWNSHIP, 34,.RANGE 39, THE
SOUTH 830 OF THE.WT 1550' OF. THE.SOUTH:•1/2
OF NORTHEAST'-7/4'LESS EAST Be `FT. AND LESS
SOUTH 60 FL:FOR ROAD AND CANAL R/1W;(6).(O.R.
348-1874)
Location: Northwest cornet of the' fntersediori `of: lndrfo
`Road. and Emerson Avenue
4. WYNNE RANCH, fora Chatge in'Zoning &am:the
AG-5 (Agrlcultural.• I du/5-acres). Zoning Disirkt to the U
(Utilities) Zoning. " Distrrd for -the following described
propeitr
APARCEL OF LAND EYING IN THE.SOUTHEAS ..ONE
QUARTER (1/4) OFr$ECTiON 5, TOWNSHIP 35-SOUTH;
RANGE 37. EA$T::.ST y,L.UaEcCOUNTYi ¢LORIDA A146.1
COMMENCE AT THE'SOUTHEAST .CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 87°57'45 WEST; AS "A
BASIS OF BEARINGS,,ALONG THE: SOUTH LINE'OF
SAID SECTION.S;<A DISTANCE OF 2672.00-FEET•TO
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER'OF SAID:SOUTHEAST,ONE
QUARTER (1/4) OF: SECTION 5• .THENCE .'NORTH
00°21-15" EAST. ALONG. THE WEST. LINE OF: SAID
,SQUTHWEST.ONE'.QUARTER.(1/4),OF SECTION'.5;:A
p JISTANCE OF 1894 37FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN-
NING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH •00*27 15" ,EAST
ALONG SAID, WES7'LINE,, A DISTANCE OF; 656:70
.FEET; THENCE.SOUTH 89°1916".EAST, DEPARTING
SAID -WEST, LINE, A DISTANCE OF 656.10 'FEET,
-THENCE SOUTH QV27'15" WEST, A .DISTANCE OF
656.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°19'16" WEST; A DIS-
TANCE OF 656.70 FEET. TO -THE .'POINT .OF
BEGINNING.. .
SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT- FOR " INGRESS AND
EGRESS AND. PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE OVER
THE WEST 25 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINING 9,900 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Locations North side of Orange Avenue, approximately
5.75 miles west of Minute Maid Road.
5. WYNNE RANCH, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow
the operation of an Air Curtain Incinerator in the U (Utili-
ties) Zoning District for the following described property:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE
QUARTER (1 /4) OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH,
RANGE 37 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 87°57'45" WEST, AS A
BASIS OF BEARINGS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 2672.00 FEET TO
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE
QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH
00°27'15" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 5, A'
DISTANCE OF 1894.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN-
NING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH OW27'15" EAST
ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 656.70
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°19'16" EAST, DEPARTING
SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF' 656.70 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00"27'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
656.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°19'16" WEST; A DIS-
TANCE OF 656.70 FEET TO THE . POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND
EGRESS AND PUBLIC.UTILITY ANDDRAINAGE OVER
THE WEST 25 FEETTHEREOF.
CONTAINING 9,900 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Location:' North side of Orange Avenue; approximately
.6.75 miles west of Minute Maid Road. .
6. FLORIDA CENTER FOR RECOVERY, INC .for 6. C0rid'i-.
tional Use Permit to allow Social Services and Health Care
Facilities.in the i (Institutional) Zoning District for the fol
[owing described-propetty:
. WHITE CITY S/D 05936'40" BEGAT NW.COR OF LOT
W.
100 RUN E 135 FT .TH WA 35 FT, TH N.TO POBAESS RD
AND CANAL R/W (44) (1.72 AC) (MAP 34/05S) (OR
1524-2594) C
WHITE .CITY -.S/D. 05°36'40" THAT,:PART &R LOT''106
LYG E OF DRAINAGE CANAL #103 LESS THAT PART
LYG N OF=DRAINAGE CANAL- #103-:AND.N430 FT *"k
Or.LOTS d 12:AND 113 LYG E OF DRAINAGE CANAL 'i;
:#103 AND'ALL OF LOT 107 —'LESS. kDAND.CANAL
R/W — (10.45 AC) (MAP. 34/05S) (OR 1524_2594)
Q
Location; 3451. West Midway Road Ste'
PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in Commission.Chambers, 'D
Roger Poitras Annex,.2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort .Pierce, 12
Florida on August 15, 2002, beginning at 7A0 P.M. or as
soon thereafter as possible. 1-
m
PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105 .Florida Statutes, ifa q;
person decides to appeal any decision made .by a board I .�
agency; _or commission with respect to any,matterrtcotisid ,
ered.at.a meeting or hearing,.he will need of record ofthe
proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need tot m;;
ensure thata verbatim record of the.proceedings is made 1 r+.;
which record includes the testimony and -evidence upon
H
which the appeal -is to be based..
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
/S/ Stefan Matthes, CHAIRMAN
Publish: August 1, 2002
2487476
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners Hof fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by,`the favorable vote of four4ifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes To allow the operation of a car wash facility in the CN (Commercial,
the Following Neighborhood) Zoning District.
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property i
Located At: 5321 Sunshine State'Parkway/Turnpike Feeder Road. 1 AUG 6 009
Currently Zoned. - CN (Commercial, Neighborhood)
,
Please Return : T o: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
-
Planniny Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce; Fl- 34882
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by:. August 12, 2002.
AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 -feetof the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address: S ✓V1' ( !.J
2' f
J
Data?'^
3 -
Please note that any form returned without a -name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
i
Comments:
I
I, (FILE NO. CU-02-001 Timothy & Debra Rose Car Wash)
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE,RESPONSE FORM
t- _ U-
(FILE NO. CU-02-001 Timothy & Debra Rose Car Wash)
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed bythe owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
the Following
Conditional Use:
To allow the operation of a car wash facility in the CN (Commercial,
Neighborhood) Zoning District.
Regarding Property
Located At: 5321 Sunshine State Parkway / Turnpike Feeder Road.
Currently Zoned: CN (Commercial, Neighborhood)
mease Return i o: St. Lucie County, Department of -Community Development
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
} j i
L: U
AUG
7 2002
COAT
.i
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
1 AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
mate:
0M
0
8�'— <., 0 _-)_ Signed:
1 Go 2Z
I. U c e f-01 31`f 1-f/
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments: l h l ,f1,- ogo s o- L W)} S r-SECT& D lyU I H- F P# S T,
`�-�� w S 0 C 1 t C` I N? Na I o I.J i L C' -r It E
1-1 C, H-TJ
A) i rV VU E it C K o M E O o Lk IZ aM E S
OT�kS l
(FILE NO. CU-02-001 Timothy & Debra Rose Car Wash)
(FILE NO. CU-02-001 Timothy & Debra Rose Car Wash)
Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 08/15/02
�C�E CpG
�y y�
File Number CU`-02-007.
o
- MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO:
Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM:
Planning Manager
DATE:
August 9, 2002
SUBJECT:
Application of Florida Center for Recovery, Inc. fora Conditional Use
Permit to allow Social Services and Health Services in the I (institutional),
Zoning District.
LOCATION: "
3451 West Midway Road.
ZONING DISTRICT:
.'I (Institutional)
FUTURE LAND USE:.
RU (Residential Urban)
i PARCEL SIZE:
12.17 acresa
PROPOSED USE:
Social Services and Health Services
SURROUNDING ZONING: ARA to the south, east, north, and west. l (Institutional) to,
the northwest and west. 'RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family -
4 du/acre) to the northeast.
SURROUNDING LAND USES: The ; general exis ' mounding the property is
institutional some residentia .
I
_
The uture. Land Use Classification of the surrounding
area is RS.
FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #6 (350 East Midway Road) is located
approximately 3Y2 miles to the east.
UTILITY SERVICE:
The subject, property is in the FPUA service area.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
I
RIGHT-OF-WAY
ADEQUACY:
The existing right-of-way for West Midway Road is 80 feet.
Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested conditional use.
MOTION TO APPROVE:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE
APPLICATION OF FLORIDA CENTER FOR RECOVERY, INC., FOR A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW SOCIAL SERVICES AND HEALTH SERVICES IN THE I
(INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE...
[LIST CONDTTION(S)]
MOTION TO DENY:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF FLORIDA
CENTER FOR RECOVERY, INC., OR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW SOCIAL
SERVICES AND HEALTH SERVICES IN THE I (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT,
BECAUSE...
[CITE REASON(S) WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
- X.
I INSTITUTIONAL
1:
Purpose
The purpose of this district is to provide and protect and environment suitable for institutional, public,
and quasi -public uses, together with such other uses as may'be compatible withinstitutional, public,
and quasi -public surroundings. The numberin following each identified use corresponds to the
SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined
under the SIC code but maybe further defined in Section 2,00.00 of this code.
2.
Permitted Uses
a. Community residential homes subject to the provisions of Section 7.10.07. (999)
b. Family day care homes. 999)
c. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be. located within a radius of
one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such familyres dential home; and. provided that
the sponsoring agency or the Department` of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS)
notifies the Boardof.County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home
is licensed by HRS. (99s)
d. ' Institutional residential homes. t9"i
e. Parks. (9s9)'
f. Police & fire protection (92Yt,9224)`
g. Recreational activities. (s99)
h. Religious organizations (ew)
3.
Lot Size Requirements
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
j 4.
Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
r
. 5.
Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements
Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00.
6.
Landscaping Requirements
Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.
'i 7.
j
Conditional Uses
a. Amphitheaters. t9991
b. Cemeteries. t6553j
c.. , Membership organizations tall
I
d. Correctional institutions. (92n),
e. Cultural activities and nature exhibitions. t999i
f. Educational services and facilities (e2)
i/
g, - Executive, legislative, and judicial functions. t91,92,93.94.95.96.971
Adopted August 1, 1990 132 Revised Through 08/01/00
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
h. Fairgrounds. (999)
i. Funeral and crematory services. (726)
j. Theaters. (999)
Medical and other health services. (oo)
' I. Postal service. (43)
M. Residential care facilities for serious or habitual juvenile offenders. (999)
—_�n. Social services (83)
o. Sporting and recreational camps (7o32)
p. Stadiums, arenas, race tracks (794)
q. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999)
8. Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following:
a. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages related to civic; social, and fraternal uses). (999)
b. Restaurants. (Including the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption only.)
(M)
C. Funeral and crematory services. u26)
d. Heliport landing/takeoff pads. (999)
e. Detached single-family dwelling unit or mobile home, for on -site security purposes. (999)
f. Residence halls or dormitories. (999)
Adopted August 1. 1990
133
U
Revised Through 08/01/00
Im
24,
IL
Land Use
a9 RS
Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.
II
II
P/F
RS
I
I
P/
I
' I
I
I
west mlaway Koaa
Canal
No. 103
I > I
I � I
P/F
; �� a
�
0
90�
909 ,��
> I
I
1 I
RS
�- - 3 --4
Daniels St
0
I
0
1
�
I
c
c
I
-0
0
1
I
0
1
�
I
I CO�o/
I
105
m
RS
C
90�
�
I
R SI
I
�
I
I
I
U
I
I
— — — — — —
—
--- ------I --
: z
999 1
992
=; a :,$N :
99� O
I
0.:9-
J
RS
I
I
�
Z n
i
I
CU 02-007
This
pattern indicates subject parcel
Map prepared July 29, 2002
This
pattern indicates City of Port St. Lucie
TbW W been 6.�P� eb ^.
Whip e-y ~t- bean n de b pestle tM nmt--tend w�ume
it—n M P=b* 4 is not Oft -Wed tm m = t IWW bkK" doanst.
Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.
II
fl
AR1
I
I �
I
f
I
I
West Mldwav Road
Canal
L No. 103
/Z
9009
90�
-o
0
0
c
c
0
90g
AR-1
,
9C�
I
u:
------------
;ems•
a;_�:.;
I
N6,
:
Z
o
0
i
AF
jr
i
CU 02-007
This
pattern indicates subject parcel
This
pattern indicates City of Port St. Lucie
qla
Map prepared July 29, 2002 T
M. m.a h., bean —pW a a.-W pi—*V w .rer— P.P—
MU e—y ellan ties been me to P-+ m. m —. -rw sauna
b*wnsd n pmsUe. 4b eat W&wiEed brr .s a WWV bir6q Ooamni
A Petition of Florida Center for Recovery, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Social
Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional) Zoning District.
II
II
s�
I
Iall
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
Canal
902
Flo,
105
:3
p
Z
s'I
o
-
CA
i
M
O
Z
-a'
— — —
",�
-
i
CU 02-007
This
pattern indicates subject parcel
�y
This pattern indicates City of Port St. Lucie
s-tic,
to,
(4
Map prepared July 29, 2002
mt. —P hm been WMQW a gwwW pWm*w .na
wb+. e—y ~t— b— n`.d. to pow. 0. ff"--a. a C.I.W..l
Wommbon P. + . R b not W"nd d 6., — u . Wg* d^�"'0 OaGJrneiL
Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.
99
0.052
0.033
0.005 0
0.941
0.98 ac.
1.644 ac
ac. 02
��
2.03
1.936
1.904
1.959
ac.
2.25
0.98
2.752 ac.
ac.
ac.
ac.
ac.
ac.
CU 02-007----------500' boundary
Fx� This pattern indicates subject parcel
This pattern indicates City of Port St. Lucie
G_(5-6
Map prepared July 29, 2002
n,i, nW tmm cwroW fwgwwMend . «.,.
WNe e" aw t- O.en rude b Wmide er r a —* end .[wale
kdo ion po. bK C. a ".n*d bass a. a MOM' bk..V d..—t
■
3
>a d
a
!
3.
£, 4
kt �
tmw
c5i y � y ul
A;
AGENDA - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
F, BOG
THURSDAY, August.l5, 2002
cn -<
7. 00 P.M.
FLORIDA CENTER FOR RECOVERY, INC, has petitioned St. Lucie County for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow Social Services and Health,Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
Zoning District for the following described property:
Location: 3451 West Midway Road.
- Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning. Agency are electronically
recorded: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the "Local Planning Agency with
respect to any matter .considered at such meeting or hearing, -he will need a record of the
I
proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
,
!
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the ,appeal. is
to be based Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing
will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an -opportunity to cross-examine any
individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the
public hearing will also be considered
Prior to this public hearing,. notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners
" August 5, 2002. Legal notice was published in The News and The Tribune, newspapers of general
I
circulation in St. Lucie County, on August 1, 2002.
File No. CU-02-007
it
I
I I
I
AV -
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
August 5, 2002
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that FLORIDA
CENTER FOR RECOVERY, INC., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Conditional Use Permit to
allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following
described property:
Location: 3451 West Midway Road.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
The first public hearing on the petition will be held at 7.00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on
Thursday, August 15, 2002, County Commissioner's Chambers, St Lucie County Administration Building
Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to
be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered.
Written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission should be received by the County Planning
Division at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual Planning and Zoning Commission and County
Commission on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or
provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to
appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at
such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying
during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-
examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing
may be continued to a date -certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above -described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call 7721462-1582 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number CU-02-007.
Sincerely,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Stefan Matthes, Chairman
JOHN D. BRUHN, District No. 1 • DOUG COWARD, District No. 2 • PAULA A. LEWIS. District No. 3 • FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No. 4 • CLIFF BARNES. District No. 5
County Administrator - Douglos M. Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue • Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 • Planning: (772) 462-2822 GI5/rechnical Services: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 • Fax: (772) 462-2132
www.co.st-lucie.fl.us
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
the Following
Zoning District.
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At:
3451 West Midway Road.
Currently Zoned. •
I (Institutional)
Please Return To.
St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
1 HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
Date: Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CU-02-007 Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.)
Child Abuse Services, Training & Life Enrichment
To: Planning and Zoning Commission of St. Lucie County, Florida
Re: CU 02007
The CASTLE- (located at 33525 SW Midway Rd, Fort Pierce) supports the application of
Florida Center for Recovery, Inc. for a conditional use permit to allow social services and
healtlrservices in the I (institutional) zoning district.
02
y4 �b
Them Garbanno-May bong Bo
Executive Director Assistant Director
8/15/02
EXCHANGE CLUB
%C Lr
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 12908 • Fort Pierce, FL 34979 Office: 3525 SW Mic:way Road* Fore Pierce, FL 34981
Voice: 561.455-6011 • Fax: 561.46-5.6013 !' Finail: tQtar'bar=r:o-mn„-excha ,.; s�:�.��
Spomored in part by Etrt: ngv Crube, DCF. UNed Way of Indian River, ManIn , 31. LUCie and Okdechobve Countlee-
Cni iron's Scry = Council; of Menin and St. Lucia Counilee. CSN of Indian glver Cony.
r
gawp
`trams
gktsiciti A 9 772-46 f -36 f2
9Gi, mmt & %amieyt . 4Ww 15, 2002 CU-02-007
O
2630 CpdkA8wsbViww
Planning & Zmalog Be.r
23001ilcglaa Avenue
Fort Pierce, FhL
Dear Planning Hoard: Re: File CU-024W Fan. Center for Recoveq,1w-
OUr homeowners aUociatioa Las the following eotKxras regard & tell COMOtiosae
are.
1. Featims aromw the perimeter
2. Sadrmg (nigh) for 68 potieaa
3. AigW of- Way for Midway (W bimate)
4. Clam ar to are: Social Servioea: Red& Services
Alter ailesding a meeting we were isknwd that tie cNesiele w as W a-W
alcohol substance slwoe patients, that they world be picked ■p from the pbse
and trawporsed to the Meatioa. That they world be private par patlests.
Sincerely,
Pdar'.h Fork F:: emrV
Gaveramentsl ILepreaenative
772-461-3612 Patrim A. Famick
Ski CU M4)(M
- !dam------ -----. �--�---- -
i;l
;on.
ai: golf,
`i
rship
lour: op_
events,
wonder:
sember-
a
385
Major Group 80.---HEALTH SERVICES
The Major Group as a Whole
This major group includes establishments primarily engaged in furnishing medical, sur-
gical, and other health services to persons. Establishments of associations or groups, such as
Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), primarily engaged in providing medical or other
health services to members are included, but those which limit their services to the provision
of insurance against hospitalization or medical costs are classified in Insurance, Major Group
63. Hospices are also included in this major group and are classified according to the primary
service provided.
Industry groups 801 through 804 includes individual practitioners, group clinics in which
a group of practitioners is associated for the purpose of carrying on their profession, and
clinics which provide the same services through practitioners that are employees.
Industry
Group Industry
No. No.
801
802
803
OFFICES AND CLINICS OF DOCTORS OF MEDICINE
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
Establishments of licensed practitioners having the degree of M.D. and en-
gaged in the practice of general or specialized medicine and surgery. Estab-
lishments operating as clinics of physicians are included in this industry. Os-
teopathic physicians are classified in Industry 8031.
Ambulatory surgical centers
Anesthesiologists, offices of
Clinics of physicians (M.DJ
Dermatologists, offices of
Freestanding emergency medical (M.D.)
centers
Gynecologists, offices of
Neurologists, offices of
Obstetricians, offices of
Oculists, offices of
Ophthalmologists, offices of
Orthopedic physicians, offices of
OFFICES AND CLINICS OF DENTISTS
8021 Offices and Clinics of Dentists
Pathologists (M.DJ, offices of
Pediatricians, offices of
Physicians (M.D.). including specialists:
offices and clinics of
Plastic surgeons, offiors of
Primary care medical (M.D.) clinics
Psychiatrists, offices of
Psychoanalysts, offices of
Radiologists, offices of
Surgeons (M.D.), offices of
'Urologists, offices of
Establishments of licensed practitioners having the degree of D.M.D. or
D.D.S. (or D.D.Sc.) and engaged in the practice of general or specialized den-
tistry, including dental surgery. Establishments operating as clinics of dentists
are included in this industry.
Clinics of dentists
Dental surgeons, offices of
Dentists, offices and clinics of
Endodontists, offices of
Oral pathologists, offices of
Orthodontists, offices of
Pathologists, oral: offices of
Periodontists, offices of
Prosthodontists, offices of
OFFICES AND CLINICS OF DOCTORS OF OSTEOPATHY
8031 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Osteopathy
Establishments of licensed practitioners having the degree of D.O. and en-
gaged in the practice of general or specialized osteopathic medicine and sur-
386 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
Industry Im Ind
Group Industry Gi
803 No. No. OFFICES AND CLINICS OF DOCTORS OF OSTEOPATHY —Con. 805
8031 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Osteopathy —Con.
gery. Establishments operating as clinics of osteopathic physicians are includ-
ed in this industry.
Osteopathic physicians, offices and clin-
ics of
804 OFFICES AND CLINICS OF OTHER HEALTH PRACTITIONERS
8041 Offices and Clinics of Chiropractors
Establishments of licensed practitioners having the degree of D.C. and en-
gaged in the practice of chiropractic medicine. Establishments operating as
clinics of chiropractors are included in this industry.
Chiropractors, offices and clinics of Clinics of chiropractors
8042 Offices and Clinics of Optometrists
Establishments of licensed practitioners having the degree of O.D. and en-
gaged in the practice of optometry. Establishments operating as clinics of op-
tometrists are included in this industry.
Optometrists, offices and clinics of
8043 Offices and Clinics of Podiatrists
Establishments of licensed practitioners having the degree of D.P. and en-
gaged in the practice of podiatry. Establishments operating as clinics of podia-
trists are included in this industry.
Podiatrists, offices and clinics of
8049 Offices and Clinics of Health Practitioners, Not Elsewhere Classified
Establishments of health practitioners engaged in the practice of health
fields, not elsewhere classified. Practitioners may or may not be licensed or =`
certified, depending on the State in which they practice. Establishments oper- f,
ating as clinics of health practitioners, not elsewhere classified, are included
in this industry. i 3
Acupuncturists, except M.D.: offices of Nutritionists, offices of
Audiologists, offices of Occupational therapists, offices of
Christian Science practitioners, offices Paramedics, offices of
Of Physical therapists, offices of
Dental hygienists, offices of Physicians' assistants, offices of :.
Dieticians, offices of Psychiatric social workers, offices of
Hypnotists, offices of Psychologists, clinical: offices of
Inhalation therapists, registered Psychotherapists, except M.D.: offices of 806
Midwives, offices of Speech clinicians, offices of
Naturopaths, offices of Speech pathologists, offices of
Nurses, registered and practical: offices
of, except home health care services
805 NURSING AND PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES
This group includes establishments primarily engaged in providing inpa
tient nursing and health -related personal care. Establishments providing diag-
nostic, surgical, and extensive medical services are classified in Industry
Group 806, and those providing residential care with incidental nursing or
medical services are classified in Industry Group 836.
Industry
Group
No.
805
806
SERVICES
Industry
No.
NURSING AND PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES —Con.
8051 Skilled Nursing Care Facilities
387
Establishments primarily engaged in providing inpatient nursing and reha-
bilitative services to patients who require continuous health care, but not hos-
pital services. Care must be ordered by and under the direction of a physician.
The staff must include a licensed nurse on duty continuously with a minimum
of one full-time registered nurse on duty during each day shift. Included are
establishments certified to deliver skilled nursing care under the Medicare
and Medicaid programs.
Convalescent homes with continuous Mental retardation hospitals
nursing care Nursing homes, skilled
Extended care facilities
8052 Intermediate Care Facilities
Establishments primarily engaged in providing inpatient nursing and reha-
bilitative services, but not on a continuous basis. Staffing must include 24-
hour per day personnel with a licensed nurse on duty full-time during each
day shift. At least once a week, consultation from a registered nurse on the
delivery of care is required. Included are facilities certified to deliver interme-
diate care under the Medicaid program.
Intermediate care facilities
Nursing homes, intermediate care
8059 Nursing and Personal Care Facilities, Not Elsewhere Classified
Establishments primarily engaged in providing some nursing and/or health -
related care to patients who do not require the degree of care and treatment
that a, skilled or intermediate care facility is designed to provide. Patients in
these facilities, because of their mental or physical condition, require some
nursing care, including the administering of medications and treatments or
the supervision of self-administered medications in accordance with a physi-
cian's orders. Establishments primarily engaged in providing day -today per-
sonal care without supervision of the delivery of health services prescribed by
a physician are classified in Industry 8361.
Convalescent homes for psychiatric pa-
tiente, with health care
Convalescent homes with health care
Domiciliary care with health care
Homes for the mentally retarded with
health care, except skilled and inter-
mediate care facilities
HOSPITALS
Nursing homes except skilled and in-
termediate care facilities
Personal care facilities with health care
Personal care homes with health care
Psychiatric patient's convalescent
homes
Rest homes with health care
This group includes establishments primarily engaged in providing diagnos-
tic services, extensive medical treatment including surgical services, and other
hospital services, as well as continuous nursing services. These establishments
have an organized medical staff, inpatient beds, and equipment and facilities
to provide complete health care. Convalescent homes with extended care facili-
ties, sometimes referred to as convalescent hospitals, are classified in Industry
8051.
388 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
Industry
Group Industry
No. No.
806 HOSPITALS —Con.
8062 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals
Establishments primarily engaged in providing general medical and surgical
services and other hospital services. Specialty hospitals are classified in Indus-
tries 8063 and 8069.
General medical and surgical hospitals
8063 Psychiatric Hospitals
Establishments primarily engaged in providing diagnostic medical services
and inpatient treatment for the mentally ill. Establishments, known as hospi-
tals, primarily engaged in providing health care for the mentally retarded are
classified in Industry 8051.
Mental hospitals, except for the men- Psychiatric hospitals
tally retarded
8069 Specialty Hospitals, Except Psychiatric
Establishments primarily engaged in providing diagnostic services, treat-
ment, and other hospital services for specialized categories of patients, except
mental. Psychiatric hospitals are classified in Industry 8063.
Alcoholism rehabilitation hospitals Hospitals, specialty: except psychiatric
Cancer hospitals Maternity hospitals
Children's hospitals Orthopedic hospitals
Chronic disease hospitals Rehabilitation hospitals: drug addiction
Drug addiction rehabilitation hospitals and alcoholism '
Eye. ear, nose, and throat hospitals in- Tuberculosis and other respiratory ilk -
patient ness hospitals
807 MEDICAL AND DENTAL LABORATORIES
8071 Medical Laboratories
Establishments primarily engaged in providing professional analytic or diag , =
nostic services to the medical profession, or to the patient on prescription of a
physician.
Bacteriological laboratories (not menu- Medical laboratories, clinical -
factuArW Pathological laboratories
Biological laboratories (not manufactur- Testing laboratories, medical: analytic
ing) or diagnostic -
Blood analysis laboratories Urinalysis laboratories
Chemists, biological: (not manufactur- X-ray laboratories, including dental
ing) laboratories of (not manufacturing)
Dental laboratories, X-ray
8072 Dental Laboratories
Establishments primarily engaged in making dentures, artificial teeth, and ,
orthodontic appliances to order for the dental profession. Establishments pri-
marily engaged in manufacturing artificial teeth, except to order, are classi
fled in Manufacturing, Industry 3843, and those providing dental X-ray labora-
tory services are classified in Industry 8071.
Crowns and bridges made in dental lab- Orthodontic appliances made in dental-''`,`<
oratories to order for the profession laboratories to order for the profes-
Dental laboratories, except X-ray Sion .
Dentures made in dental laboratories Teeth, artificial: made in dental labors 7
to order for the profession tones to order for the profession
:i. -
SERVICES 389
Industry
Group Industry
No. No.
808 HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES
8082 Home Health Care Services
Establishments primarily engaged in providing skilled nursing or medical
care in the home, under supervision of a physician. Establishments of regis-
tered or practical nurses engaged in the independent practice of their profes-
sion are classified in Industry 8049, and nurses' registries are classified in In-
dustry 7361. Establishments primarily engaged in selling health care products
for personal or household consumption are classified in Retail Trade and those
engaged in renting or leasing products for health care are classified in Indus-
try 7352.
Home health care cervices
Visiting nurse associations
809 MISCELLANEOUS HEALTH AND ALLIED SERVICES, NOT
ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED
8092 Kidney Dialysis Centers
Establishments primarily engaged in providing kidney or renal dialysis
services. Offices and clinics of doctors of medicine are classified in Industry
8011.
Kidney dialysis centers
8093 Specialty Outpatient Facilities, Not Elsewhere Classified
Establishments primarily engaged in outpatient care of a specialized nature
with permanent facilities andwith medical staff to provide diagnosis, treat-
ment, or both for patients who are ambulatory and do not require inpatient
care. Offices and clinics of health practitioners are classified according to their
primary activity in Industry Groups 801 through 804.
Alcohol treatment, outpatient clinics
Biofeedback center
Birth control clinics (family planning)
Drug treatment, outpatient clinics
Outpatient detoxification center
Outpatient mental health clinics
Outpatient treatment clinics for alco-
holism and drug addiction
Rehabilitation center, outpatient (med-
ical treatment)
Respiratory therapy clinics
8099 Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified
Establishments primarily engaged in providing health and allied services,
not elsewhere classified. Offices and clinics of health practitioners are classi-
fied according .to their primary activity in Industry Groups 801 through 804.
Artists, medical Medical photography and art
Blood banks Osteoperceis centers
Blood donor stations Oxygen tent service
Childbirth preparation classes Physical examination service, except by
Health screening service physicians
Hearing testing service Plasmapheresis center
Insurance physical examination serv- Sperm banks
ice, except by physicians
394
Major Group 83.—SOCIAL SERVICES
The Major Group as a Whole
This major group includes establishments providing social services and rehabilitation
services to those persons with social or personal problems requiring special services and to
the handicapped and the disadvantaged. Also included are organizations soliciting funds to
be used directly for these and related services. Establishments primarily engaged in provid-
ing health services are classified in Major Group 80; those providing legal services are classi-
fied in Industry 8111; and those providing educational services are classified in Major Group
82.
Industry
Group Industry
No. No.
832 INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICES
1 8322 Individual and Family Social Services
Establishments primarily engaged in providing one or more of a wide varie-
ty of individual and family social, counseling, welfare, or referral services, in-
cluding refugee, disaster, and temporary relief services. This industry includes
offices of specialists providing counseling, referral, and other social services.
Government offices directly concerned with the delivery of social services to
individuals and families, such as issuing of welfare aid, rent supplements, food
stamps, and eligibility casework, are included here, but central office adminis-
tration of these programs is classified in Public Administration, Industry 9441.
Social Security offices are also classified in Public Administration, Industry
9441. Establishments primarily engaged in providing vocational rehabilitation
or counseling are classified in Industry 8331; and fraternal, civic, and social
associations are classified in Industry 8641.
Activity centers, elderly or handi-
capped
Adoption services
Adult day care centers
Aid to families with dependent children
(AFDC)
Alcoholism counseling, nonresidential:
except medical treatment
Centers for senior citizens
Child guidance agencies
Community centers
Counseling centers
Crisis centers
Crisis intervention centers
Day rare centers, adult and handi.
capped
Disaster services
Emergency shelters
Family counseling services
Family location services
Family service agencies
Helping hand services
Homemakers service, primarily non.
medical
Hotlines
Marriage counseling cervices
Meal delivery programs
Multiservice centers, neighborhood
Neighborhood centers
Offender rehabilitation agencies
Offender self-help agencies
Old age assistance
Outreach programs
Parole offices
Probation offices
Public welfare centers, offices of
Referral services for personal and
social problems
Refugee services
Relief services, temporary
Self-help organizations for alcoholics
and gamblers
Senior citizens associations
Service leagues
Settlement houses
Social service centers
Telephone counseling service
Travelers aid centers
Youth centers
Youth self-help organizations
Industry
Group
No.
833
835
836
SERVICES
Industry
No.
JOB TRAINING AND VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES
8331 Job Training and Vocational Rehabilitation Services
RNI
Establishments primarily engaged in providing manpower training and vo-
cational rehabilitation and habilitation services for the unemployed, the un-
deremployed, the handicapped, and to persons who have a job market disad-
vantage because of lack of education, job skill or experience. Included are up-
grading and job -development services, skill training, world -of -work orientation,
and vocational rehabilitation counseling. This industry includes offices of spe-
cialists providing rehabilitation and job counseling. Also included are estab-
lishments primarily engaged in providing work experience for rehabilitees.
Community service employment train-
ing programs
Job counseling
Job training
Manpower training
Rehabilitation counseling and training,
vocational
CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES
8351 Child Day Care Services
Sheltered workshops
Skill training centers
Vocational rehabilitation agencies
Vocational rehabititation counseling
Vocational training agencies, except
schools
Work experience centers
Establishments primarily engaged in the care of infants or children, or in
providing prekindergarten education, where medical care or delinquency cor-
rection is not a major element. These establishments may or may not have
substantial educational programs. These establishments generally care for
prekindergarten or preschool children, but may care for older children when
they are not in school. Establishments providing babysitting services are clas-
sified in Industry 7299. Head Start centers operating in conjunction with ele-
mentary schools are classified in Industry 8211.
Child care centers Nursery schools
Day care centers, child Preschool centers
Group day care centers, child
Head Start centers, except in conjunc-
tion with schools
RESIDENTIAL CARE
8361 Residential Care
Establishments primarily engaged in the provision of residential social and
personal care for children, the aged, and special categories of persons with
some limits on ability for self -care, but where medical care is not a major ele-
ment. Included are establishments providing 24-hour year-round care for chil-
dren. Boarding schools providing elementary and secondary education are
classified in Industry 8211. Establishments primarily engaged in providing
nursing and health -related personal care are classed in Industry Group 805.
Alcoholism rehabilitation centers, resi-
dential: with health can incidental
Boys towns
Children's boarding homes
Children a homes
children,villages
Drug rehabilitation centers, residential:
with health carp incidental
Group foster homes
Halfway group homes for persons with
socisl or personal problems
Halfway homes for delinquents and of-
fenders
Homes for children, with health care
incidental
Homes for destitute men and women
Homes for the aged, with health care
incidental
Homes for the deaf or blind, with
health care incidental
Homes for the emotionally disturbed,
with health care incidental
Homes for the mentally handicapped,
with health care incidental
Homes for the physically handicapped,
with health care incidental
396 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
Industry
Group Industry _
No. No.
836 RESIDENTIAL CARE —Con.
8361 Residential Care —Con.
Juvenile correctional homes Rest homes, with health care incidental
Old soldiers' homes Self-help group homes for persons with
Orphanages social or personal problems
Rehabilitation centers, residential: with '!paining schools for delinquents
health care incidental
839 SOCIAL SERVICES, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED
8399 Social Services, Not Elsewhere Classified
Establishments primarily engaged in providing social services, not else-
where classified, including establishments primarily engaged in community
improvement and social change. Organizations primarily engaged in soliciting
contributions on their own account and administering appropriations and allo-
cating funds among other agencies engaged in social welfare services are also
included, but foundations and philanthropic trusts are classified in Finance,
Industry 6732. Civic, social, and fraternal organizations are classified in Indus-
try 8641; political organizations are classified in Industry 8651; and establish-
ments which raise funds on a contract basis are classified in Industry 7389.
Advocacy groups Health and welfare councils
Antipoverty boards Health systems agencies -
Community action agencies Regional planning organizations, for
Community chests social services
- Community development groups Social change associations
Councils for social agencies, exceptional Social service information exchanges:
children, and poverty e.g., alcoholism, drug addiction
Fundraising organizations, except on a United fund councils
contract or fee basis
ne I.()rlgIslaff6filer Recovery, Inc.
320 'Nest Montauk Highway � �. ? 1 E � Tdcphoue: (631)72"100
P.O. Box 774 E t '• 1 F= (631)728.5621 or (631)728-9075
Hampton Mips, NY 11946 r-ielpliuc: 1-8(X)-144-L1CR
August 13, 2002
Hank Flores, A.I.C'.P.
C'(-.)mrnunity Development Department
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34992-5652
Re: File No. CU-02-007
Dear Mr. Flores:
T am writing to you in regards to Florida Center for Recovery's (FCR) Application for
Conditional Use Permit. There appears to be a misunderstanding with the number of patients
that. FC;R will be creating. i'letase be advised that FCR will be a 72-lied treatment facility. The
application stated that we are estimating our capacity within the first year to be 40 patients,
however, our maximum capacity will be 72 patients. 1 apologize for any misconceptions this
may have caused your staff.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if any fw-tlier information is required.
Sincerely,
Tack Hamilton
Ptt�sident
JC:AHO Acon diced Licensed By OASAS
CC' ' ZW_c
ST. LUCIE COUNTY CO'
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM 120' '
o
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
the Following Zoning District.
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At: 3451 West Midway Road.
Currently Zoned. I (Institutional)
Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12.2002.
1 AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
Date:
IR
e r�
Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE
CU-02-007 Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.)
O
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a writ?en protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) perc£.: �t or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
the Following
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At:
Currently Zoned.
Please RPtrirn. 7-0.
To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
Zoning District.
3451 West Midway Road.
I (Institutional)
ct, Luc-ie r rglntl! Dernartrnont of Community .1
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
o �4
AUG 6 2002
nt a
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE '
1 HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
Date: ® Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CU-02-007 Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.)
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
the Following
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At:
Currently Zoned.
Please Return To:
To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
Zoning District.
3451 West Midway Road.
I (Institutional)
St. Lucie County, Department of Community Developm
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
l� L5 0 U
AUG 6 2002
CQIV'iMi:."aF CE_l'E� Fi`✓icNl
ST. LUCiE COU i Y, FL
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
1 AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address: _ ,Hiq I IL CAM. IS r-- l i—I /
Date: D 3 Signed: ��4ej �A4 Zj!rg /L f zi 2 ,
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
if
(FILE NO. CU-02-007 Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.)
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
the Following
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At:
Currently Zoned:
lvualV 1'l Cl Ull! IV.
To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
Zoning District.
3451 West Midway Road.
2
(Institutional)
St. L'uii G iuunty, Depatimeni ui Community Deveiopment
Planning Division �oQ�
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and.return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OFT 9 PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USEA. K
w-_
I HAVE NO OPINION. TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
Date: �— Y-dam Signed: '
1
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
It
(FILE NO. CU-02-007 Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.)
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
the Following Zoning District.
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At: 3451 West Midway Road.
Currently Zoned: I (Institutional)
Tease Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name c'
(Please Print):(,�(�
Address:i8�
Date: Signed:
Irlel
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CU-
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
the Following Zoning District.
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At: 3451 West Midway Road.
Currently Zoned: I (Institutional)
Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Deveiopnieni
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name��(Please Print): � —)7 'Ov���
Address: 3 Z ZV/ /�_ �'/f / ( �" ^ V"
Date: ( Signed:_Oe
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
FILE NO. CU-02-007 Florida Center for Recove Inc.)
I
( rye COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FL
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
the Following Zoning District.
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At: 3451 West Midway Road.
Currently Zoned. I (Institutional)
Please i-feturn To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print): A I1lv0lop / ' `n 64-I AXG L�
Address:
e
Date: Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CU-02-007 Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.)
Hank Flores -Agenda 5-Florida Recover�r Inc Petition �� a Pa e 1
From:
<Herbertjbeach@aol.com>
To:
<Hankf@co.st-lucie.fl.us>
Date:
8/15/02 1:15PM
Subject:
Agenda 5-Florida Recovery,lnc Petition
Please forward to P&Z board this evening as I may be able to attend.
Dear Board members: As a Community activist and past president of a
community organization, I feel that approval of the use the facility on
Midway Road should be approved and forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners to allow Florida Recovery, Inc to operate a substance abuse
(drug and alcohol) facility at this location will be an asset to the
residents of the county as there is a definite need for this type of
facility. Recognizing that you are going to get some negative complaints and
opposition of those type of people "who don't want it in my backyard, around
my kids,etc"-and knowing that there are people in our community who need or
someday will recognize the need of having a substance abuse treatment center
in the midsection of the county will be beneficial to all residents.
Therefore, I ask you to recommend approval of operation of this treatment
center to the Board and please forward this letter along with your
recommendation.
Respectfully,
Herbert J (Herb) le
Beach ?:
1012 Saeger Avenue�r`'
White City, FL.
cl
PLS ack.receipt of this letter J�C
- N
N
10
M
7
M
N
b
p•
M
M
01
•^
w
O
O,
MN
pImm
O�
-t
b
N
00
N
00 00
N N
M
'•••
O�
CT
O•
.-•
G
O�
'T
T
b
O
M
C.
N
O
N
N
O�
01
N
O�
n
b
O�
f`
b
O�
O�-
N
O�
Q
1
M
00
U
.a
M
00
O
O
Vl
Q,
N,
O
h
MON
M
M
O�
"T
T O,
Y I
O�
�
O,
�..;1
O�{�
M
M
N
I
�
O�
.O�}C
�O}�
.O�}�
�.
•
M
W
U
ONO
O•'T
O
-
V
r
oo
00
O�
n
0%
"t
00
O1
7
00
O,
•t
VOi
O,
It
N
M
00
0%
V'
00 W
O, Ol
v •0'
00
O,
'7
a0
O�
7
W
O,
�}'
00
O,
00
O,
00
O�
f`
O%
V
ao
Oc
'•t
00
Oh
V
00
O%
00
O�
00
O�
V'
oD
O,
V
ao
O�
V
00
O%
•7
00
O�
V
00.
0,01
'Q
00 -
V
N
M
M
M
M-
N
M
M
M
M
M
M M
-
M
m
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
U
-
wwwwwwwww
ww
wwwww
ww
ww
wwwa".zwwwwwww
www
�wa.aa
�aaa.�aa�
aaiG
aa.aVaaaa
�
as
aaaa'r�
i%a
as
x�
C
0
t
0
t
0
x
o
2
u
x
o
C
0
C.Z
0
0
x
0
t:
0
a,
z
o
C x
0 0
0
0
x
0��}
C,x
0
0
C,X
0
o
x
o
x
0
x,C
0
0
C
0
G
0
x
0
z
0
x
0
t:
0
0
U
mwww-k...7wwk:{s.".wA
&.Ww
wwwCJwwwwo
ww
wW
ww!?W
00
N
•p
TJ
•O
TI
'G
^7
-_
•p
•O •Lt
'O
'd
u
>
'O
'.-
•C
'O
TJ
'>
W
V
y
r!w
U
y
N
Q
O1
W O
pp
U
Q
O>>
ti
d
U
N
3
df
•°
N
3
�'
a
N
3
3
W
3
ti
of
c
�.'''G
Q
.••.��+..
NM
N
«:�
U
O
•o
...vC�.
_..
F
bv'C
°.3
>
'J
WEc
.a
U
U
O�
U
N
w
•�^+
U
..+
N
10
b
•^
'•'
•G
%
M:
00
n
Cy
...
N
C
:2
6
%..L
y
U
C�
•c+
•�
y
o
30
oU
oLc.i'3'^�
-333
J7
c.>c�3w•^.
rnAv7
33
3A�33
33
A3
.�
(•Yl
Ci
W
O•
W.O
W
O
W
O
ooNO
-
O.
BOO
'�T
S
Ov
N
C
b
OMNOy
%0
10
•c�..
O
-
cnM
M
00
OC-
00.
00
.d
OOSN
p
v
O
OO
N
OO
"t
NVOO
O�
N
.�i
�.
b
OOO
N
et
O�
N
OONO�N
N
OO
bNO�O
V
NN
O
O�
M
0.
0.
Q
0.
a
V•
M
N
••+
M
M M
N
N
N
N
00
N
M.
M
N
N
M
M
V'
M
M
-
M
M
N
z
a
zw
,
zz
wrra
b
212
as
aaa
x
N
•V
'O
Q
,-
x
-
O
0
fj
(7
Ci
ri
wq
p�0+
a
fyi
8
0
C
'S
3
3
0
'ua
2
aat�
e4
c7
z
ti
mgo
.o•.
W
P4fLa
C4
F.
U
n°a
U�
AE
Oaq
Gl.;
yuq
7
N
td
.a
3
p�
ti
O
V
C"
3
o-
;p
a
0
.�L
-
9
o
gx
2
erd
o
0
a
x
a
o�
c�
o
q
g
Z
i$oammU
V
wwwwt7
o�
OC
x
d•�fC{�NC�Cxaxt�CacS
a:a
xz
as
p>
O J
(-R
N
(-IN
-'DFD
oO�
F4
0000
NN
NV
M
O
-i
NO
Ci
N
M
M
N
0!
b00
M
••+
C;
C^04(V
NN
COG
COOnC
C—C
OOO
:C••+ooN
00•-+
O
b0 ..0
_
8
J
V
O
M
O
T
O
N
b
M
rn
••••
M
N
N
S
n.
00
O
M
N
h
O\
V' •pt
(�
et
N^
00
C
N
at
tT
00
M
N't
1�
M
O
•a�}{•
�o
N
Q�
00
�O
M
O
N
C
O
0
O�
^
N
00
O
I^
C—
O
••••
N1
O�
--•
N
tV
M
Kl
M
C
N C
C C
O
^-
t
C
N
C
••••
C
••••
—
R
•n
n
O
N
C
C
•-•
O
C
O
O O
tV
C
O
-%
^%
0
6^
d
C
C
••O••
b
`��$OOpG
Q O
SNSN
pNprO
00
00
S
rbbNNNOpSNOp
0
O
O
O
18�8N��$
O
O
O
0,
ppQ
00CpMNN0�0M
O
O
O
O
[O�f
O
Opb
O
�gj00^
10
8M
4r t0
0
O_
O�
O
O
O
oo
b
N
•�T
O
NO
%O
t�
N_
O
M
O•
n
N_
00
O�
tom•
%o
•A
N
O
S
-
'V'
O
O� N
00
Qpp
O
00
00
[�
O
00
�t
O.
O�
00
••-•
00
b
N_
2V
n
N
b
N
V
00
10
h_
^+
pp
10
N_
N
l�
M
M
O
O
N
O
N
O
N
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
C
N
O
N
00
N
M
0
N
0
N
0 0
N N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
Cl
N
O
N
C
N
O
N
C
N
C
N
O
O
O
O
O-
O
O
O
O
it
V1
V1
V1
N
N
N
N
O
N
!-•
C.
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
Q
N
Q
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
•,y
O
O
;C
Nj
1��1
M
M
M
M
AM
l��f
t�•1
t��1
t��1
M
M f��1
M
M
M
M
M
�
M
t
(��1
M
-
M
l��f
M
M
f�•1
M
M
Q-
H
ON
Sh
a
aO
aol
ba
Ob
_
N
c°O.rnrnrn
M
M
M
M
arnah
M M
M
7
W
aaa
wwwwa
-t
w
a41
wwaG
o
awA.04W
43.ra.a4
:U
wwwwazzwww-,
v�rA
o'cU
in
q
3
ra
1
Q
MQV
en
YOf
fNV
z,'ZM
MST.
A.
b
u
z
h
z
M
W
xxx
°o 1X-01
z
a
Rw
u
a�3a
d00
r
rs
!
.A
u
M
M
O
C
C4
00
O
a
W
!
S. •
F
U
WO
M
po
U
h
S
^h+
0000
N
W,N
M
S
E L'
g
h
OOOG
M
O
N
0-+OOO
n
Q
O, M
O
N
.0
�i
(y
O O
!'
_C
O
n
O
h
N
�O
080
O
W
N8
O
00
O8�
N
oo
N8 O8.
MC�
M
100
�O
h8
8
O.t"'
01
-C
0
N
0OO0000.n000
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
M N
N
N
at
hhvrhhhv�-hhh
l
N
06
a .
{
1
ST, LUCIEICOUNTY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION iM s*
-
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA a>1
August 15, 2602t.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
5. WYNNE RANCH, for a Conditional Use Permit fo allow ,
NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with' Secfioa
11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County wand Development.Code
the operation of an Air Curtain Incinerator in U (Utili-
ties) Zoning District for the following described property
and the provisions of the Sh Lucie County Comprefiensive
Plan, the following applicants have requested'that: the St.
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE
Lucie County Planning and. Zoning' Commission 6nslder
their following requests:
QUARTER: (1/4) OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH;
RANGE 37 EAST, ST:LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA 'AND '
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS -
]..CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
for a Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single,
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
Fgmily - 3 du/aae) Zoning District to theA (Institutional)
Zoning District for the following described property: I
SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 87"5T45" WEST, AS A
BASIS OF BEARINGS,' ALONG THE SOUTH LINE `OF
i
SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE .OF 2672.00` FEET TO
THE NW 1/4 OF.THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF,
SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP SOUTH, 40'J:AST,
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE '
OF SECTION, .5; THENCE NORTH.
35 RANGE
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS ROAD RiGHT•OF-!
QUARTER (1/4)
00°27'15"'EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE, OF SAID
WAYS AND FURTHER LESS THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE;
SOUTH 210 FEET.
SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION S,.A
OF 1894.32 FEET TO, THE POINT OF BEGIN=
f
I
DISTANCE
NING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00°27'15" EAST
Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Selvitzl
ALONG SAID WEST:LINE, A'DISTANCE OF 656.70'
Road and Edwards:Road
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89019'16" EAST, DEPARTING;
SAID WEST LINE, A- DISTANCE OF 656.70 FEET;.
2. TIMOTHY AND DEBRA ROSE CAR WASH, fora Coridi-
THENCE SOUTH 00°27'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
'
tional Use Permit to allow-ilie operation of a car. wash'
facility in the CN(Comm ercial,'Neighborhood)Zontng�Dis-
656.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH B9°19'16" WEST -A 01S=
TANCE OF 656.70 FEET TO THE POINT Of
hid for the following described property:
BEGINNING.
LOTS 11 8, 12, BLOCK 169, LAKEWOO15PARK "UNIT
SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT .FOR INGRESS • AND
.
12A, AS RECORDED IN PLAT -BOOK 11, PAGE 35, PUB-
EGRESS AND PUBLIC.'UTIUTY AND DRAINAGE OVER:
LIC RECORDS OE ST; LUCIE COUNTY; FLORIDA:::
THE WEST 25 FEET THEREOF.
Locations 5321 Sunshine State Parkway /;Turnpike Feeder
CONTAINING 9,900'ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
i Road.
Location:' North side of Orange Avenue, approximately.
.
3. GLASSMAN HOLDINGS, INC., fora pwnge Jn Zoning
5.75 miles west of Minuto Maid Road.
from the AG-1 (Agdoulturai I,du/acre) Zoning DisMd to
the CG (Commerdal, General) Zoning District for the foi
•6. FLORIDA CENTER FOR, RECOVERY, INC for a Cond(;
lowing described property, :: t E
i =
tiorra(Use Permit to allovi.Soctal Services and; klealih Care
I (Institutional) Zoning District for the fo1-
IN SEC710N 15�.''.TOWNSHIP 34 RANGE 39 THE
Fadlnies.in;the
lowing desa96ed property j'-
SOUTH 830 OFjHE,EAST T550 OF THE.SOUTH;1/2
f OF NORTHEASTS'1/4 LESS: EAST 80'Ff AND;USS
-
I 'WHITE CITY S/D 05°3640 BEG..AT NW.COR OF LOT
WA 35•-K TH N TO P.OB LESS �2D
�=
, r
j SOUTH 60 FL fOR ROAD:AND. CANAL': �6j jO.R -
348=1874J' {
n
100 RUNE 135 FT :TH
AND CANAL R/W =T (44j.(1.72 AC IMAP 34I05S)
Location:` Northwest corner of �1he interseefiad 4f Indrfo
1524-2594j
04 �.
RoadandEmersonAvenue
1
WHITE CITY S/p 05°3640 THAT PART :OFF LOT 106
LYG E OF'' DRAINAGE ,CANAL #103.LESS i1�AT PART
4. WYNNE RANCH fora Change in Zoning ran the
AG-5 (Agricultural 1 du/5 aaes) Zontng'Dishicj fo thu U
LYG N OF:DRAINAGE CANAL 41 AND N 130.FT
I .OF LOTS 4 AND '113 LYG E .OF` DRAINAGE CANAL
'!
(Utilities); ZoningD;sktd fcV.-Ae folfwwf described
4103 AND ALL OF; LOT 107 B LESS RD.AMD CANAL
t7;
propeit
R/W (10.45 An (MAP 34/O55). (OR 1524 2594)
Q
A PARCEL OF LJWD LYING.It�f THE SOUTHEAST.ONE
Locahon.3451 West Midway Road
QUARTER (f /4) OFr$ECT10N S, TOWNS�11 35 SOUT4(
RANGEt 37 EAST •ST LUCI,fp1JtXj ff4A AND
PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in Commission Chambers,
>3
BEING(v(ORE,PAItT7CULARLYDESCRIBEDAS60llOt(VS .
Roger Poitras Annex;2300 Vlrgirila.Avemie; Fort Werce
15,"2002, beginning at 7 00 P M or cz
g ,s . ,
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
Florida on August
soon ihereaker as possible
r
1-
SECTION 5 THENCE SOUTH'87°5T45".'1A(EST A5 A
BASIS OF BEARINGS, •AL'ONG THE SOU719 i1NE'OF.
PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105 .Florida. Statutes, ff>'a
m
Gc
SAID SECTION S,-A OtSTANCE OF 267Z.00 FEET TO'
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER'OF SAID SOIq'E ew.*ONE
person decides to appegl any decislon made.by a board,
commission with rasped to cmy,matte( cansid
�S
'
" QUARTER .(1/4)' OF SECTION 5 THENC NORTH
00°2T15" (AST, ALONG. THE WEST' lIt4E OF SAID
,pgerlcy;-or
erect at.o'meeting orhearing,Jre w111 need d.record of;tlie
proceedings and thaf;,forsuch"purposas,'he may need fo
FiF
SOUTHWEST Oi4E'.QUARTER (1/4J OF. SECrTION 5 -'
ensure ttwta ver{wtim record of the proceedings it ma?a
upon
(,,DISTANCE OF 1894.32 FEET TO THE PpIN1F OF BEGIN '
which record incjudes tha testimgny and -evidence
NING;. THE CONTINUE -N09TH '00'27'T5" EI1S1
which the'appeal•is ao be
.
ALONG SAiD, WEST .`LINE,. A DISTANCE OF.- _ 656;7Q.
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°15 .EAST0 AEPARTING
.
' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION..
FLORIDA
SAID WEST • LINE A• DISTANCE OF> 656.jQ ,FEET;
THENCE: SOUTH OF.
ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
CHAIRMAN
00°2T15" WEST, A .DISTANCE
/S/ Stefan'Matthes,
656.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°19')6"WEST A DIS,
TANCE .OF '656.70 FEET, TO 'THE'`POINT".�OF
Publish: August 1;2002
BEGINNING:. ;, .<; . •:.
.,
2487476
SUBJECT TO'AN EASEMENT FOR: iNGRE55 AND
EGRESS AND: PUBLIC UTILITY' AND DRAINAGE OVER
THE WEST 25 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINING 9,900 ACRES; MORE OR LESS
j Location: North side of'Orange Avenue; approximately;
5.75 miles west of.Minute Maid; Road.
i,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
the Following Zoning District.
Conditional Use: `�:��
Regarding Property
Located At: 3451 West Midway Road.
CurrentiyZoned: 1(Institutional)
wu3v Returnv: Si: �Ui:Ig �.uuiity, veparirneni t7i Community uevelopm
Planning ent
Division Cpe S �U'� ✓
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 \
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
1 AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I�AM NOT IN.FAVOR `OFT PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION.TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
Date:
Signed:
7'"
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CU-02-007 Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.)
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a wriren protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percrt. ,t or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
the Following
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At:
Currently Zoned:
To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the I (Institutional)
Zoning District.
3451 West Midway Road.
I (institutional)
Please Return. 'rn St, Lurie Cr-,unry, nopartr;•nnt.nf lnmrnUnity !�o�
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
I ` It AUG 6 2002
CGtwii�.! i _
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
1 HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
Date: ! ,S Q Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CU-02-007 Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.)
Vtf/ fLWU4 uo.cz U014ozL131 SI LUGIE W ADMIN PAGE 01
C u- zu)("e-
ST. LUCIE COUNTY C.V.
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant To allow Social Services and Health Care Facilities in the ! Institutional
the lowing Zoning District. (institutional)
Conditional Use:
Regarding Propefty
Located At: 3451 West Midway Road.
Curn9ntkZoned: I (Institutional)
Please Return To. St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statetmerds and return by: August 12. 2902.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM MM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
1 certify that, as of the date shown below, t am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Pteste PdnQ:
Address:
Date:
Is- 370,e Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE O. CU-02-007 Florida Center for Recovery, Inc.)
11
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 8/15/02
File Number RZ-02-015
h�JG\E Ccn,pG2�
I�, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
L) Planning
OR MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Manager
DATE: August 10, 2002
SUBJECT: Application of Wynne Ranch, for a Change in Zoning from the AG-5
(Agricultural - 1 du/5 acres) Zoning District to the U (Utilities) Zoning
District.
LOCATION: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 5 3/4 miles
west of Minute Maid Road and north one mile from the
entrance to Wynne Ranch.
EXISTING ZONING: AG-5 (Agricultural —1 du/5 acres)
PROPOSED ZONING: U (Utilities)
FUTURE LAND USE: AG-5 (Agricultural - 5)
PARCEL SIZE: Parent Parcel 671.32 acres
Petitioned Parcel 9.9 acres
PROPOSED USE: The purpose of the requested change in zoning is to allow
the operation of an air curtain incinerator for the disposal of
land clearing debris.
PERMITTED USES: Section 3.01.03(W), U (Utilities) identifies the designated
uses, which are permitted by right, permitted as an
accessory use, or permitted through the conditional use
process in the "U" (Utilities) Zoning District. Any use
designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo
further review and approval before that use may be
commenced on the property. Any use not identified in the
zoning district regulations is considered to be a prohibited
use in that district (see Attachment "AA").
In this case the proposed use, the operation of an air
curtain incinerator, will require a Conditional Use Permit.
This Conditional Use Permit may only be reviewed after
the petition for change in zoning has been approved.
August 10, 2002 Petition: Wynne Ranch
Page 2 File RZ-02-015
SURROUNDING ZONING: AG-5 (Agricultural - 1 du/5 acres) zoning district surrounds
the petitioned property to the north, south, east and west.
SURROUNDING LAND USES: The existing uses in this are agricultural in nature. The
Wynne Ranch is located to the north, south and west of
the subject property and citrus groves are located to the
east of the subject property. The surrounding properties
are designated with an AG — 5 (Agricultural — 1 du/5 acres)
future land use designation.
FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station # 11, is located approximately 8 miles to the east.
UTILITY SERVICE: On site wells will provide water service. On site sewer will
be provided through a septic tank system.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
RIGHT-OF-WAY
ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Orange Avenue is 200 feet.
SCHEDULED
IMPROVEMENTS: None
TYPE OF CONCURRENCY
DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit.
STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
consider and make the following determinations;
1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the
St. Lucie County Land Development Code;
The applicant is requesting a change in zoning from the AG-5 (Agricultural - 1 du/5
acres) Zoning District to the U (Utilities) Zoning District. The area in which the subject
property is located is currently zoned AG-5 (Agricultural - 1 du/5 acres) and being
utilized as citrus groves and cattle ranches. The stated purpose of this change in zoning
is to allow for development of an air curtain incinerator operation for the disposal of land
clearing debris collected from various construction sites throughout St. Lucie County and
the surrounding area. The U (Utilities) Zoning District has been determined to be an
August 10, 2002
Page 3
2.
3.
4.
Petition: Wynne Ranch
File RZ-02-015
acceptable zoning district for the establishment of this type of operation, subject to
further site specific review as part of the Conditional Use process.
Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan;
Table 1.6 of the Future Land Use Element, Data and Analysis, indicates those zoning
classifications allowed under the AG-5 land use designation. According to this table,
those activities allowed within the U (Utilities) Zoning District are considered to be
acceptable within the areas designated with a Future Land Use Classification of AG-5
(Agricultural — 5).
Policy 6B.1.2.1 of the Solid Waste Sub -element of the County's Comprehensive Plan,
Infrastructure Element states that the County will implement the most cost effective
alternative solid waste management practices that would extend the useful life of the
landfill. These alternative include, but are not limited to: resource recovery, volume
reductions by solid waste generators, volume reduction at transfer stations, separation of
solid wastes at the source, composting recycling centers, public information programs,
and operational changes that could improve efficiency. The petitioner is proposing a
procedure that would separate the land clearing debris at the source, and instead of
stockpiling it or disbursing it to the County's landfill operation they would placing it into
the air curtain incinerator and burn the materials, thereby, eliminating the source from
the landfill.
Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the
existing and proposed land uses;
The proposed zoning district is considered to be consistent with existing and proposed
future land use designations in the area. The surrounding properties are being used as
either citrus groves or cattle ranches. The permitted uses in the U (Utilities) Zoning
District are not expected to unduly impact the surrounding area or uses. Any other use
in the U (Utilities) Zoning District would be subject to Conditional Use review, prior to any
final authorizations being granted. There are no residential structures adjacent to the
subject property.
Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment;
No specific conditions have occurred in the
than the desire of the county to permit
unpopulated areas of the community.
area to warrant this specific change other
these types of incinerator operations in
5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed
August 10, 2002 Petition: Wynne Ranch
Page 4 File RZ-02-015
amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not
limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage,
schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities;
The rezoning of the property is not expected to create significant additional demands on
any public facilities in this area. Public utilities have not been installed this far west in
the county. The subject property is currently be utilized for agricultural purposes as
citrus groves. Prior to -the approval of any final development plans on the subject
property, the applicant will need to provide documentation verifying that sufficient
facilities are in place to support the use.
St. Lucie County's Public Works Department has scheduled road construction on the
shoulders of Orange Avenue, thereby, significantly reducing the roadway deficiencies in
this area.
6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
significant adverse impacts on the natural environment;
The proposed change in zoning itself is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the
natural environment. The applicant/property owner will be required to comply with all
federal, state, and local environmental regulations, as part of any submitted
development pants for this site. The site does not contain any known unique or
threatened habitat. The petitioned property is currently being used as a citrus grove.
7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an
orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative
affects of such patterns;
The subject property is currently being utilized as a citrus grove. The reclassification of
this property to a limited use zoning district such as U (Utilities) Zoning District would not
result in the introduction of incompatible land uses or activities with the surrounding low
density agriculture activities.
8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest,
and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code;
The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in
harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
COMMENTS
The petitioner, Wynne Ranch, has requested this change in zoning from the AG-5 (Agricultural -
1 du/5acres) Zoning District to the U (Utilities) Zoning District for property located north of
August 10, 2002 Mition.n Wynne Ranch °
v
Page 5 1 File RZ 02-015`
'
Orange Avenue,` approXimately 314 miles west of ,Minute Maid Ioad:and then north one mile .
till
��;f
from the en#race to Wynne (�an�h Tie<indicated pUrpose`of this,change id -zoning is to allow
for the submiason of an application for; a conditi4rlal use permit to operate an air curtains
is
inclrerator on the subject pr9perky The subject property is in ail aroa designated =within `t(ie`
o
Corrpr�hensive,Plan,asbeiri-g corripatiblewith or for tine U (lJtilitie`s) Zonin' District.Mi
Staff re has viewed this petition and that it conforms,4ithIhe stan, ilards,of'review as
,determined
set forth in the St. Lucie County"Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals,
`
objectivee"s,. and .policies of the St ;Lucie County: Comprehensive'. Plan ,Staff recon'im ds. that
you forward this petition to.,the Board of County Comtrissioners witf7 a r'ecorpmendation"'Of.:,,
approval
rt. rj
Please contact this office if yo.0 have any "questions on :this matter:
is
x r
HAwpV06hing\wynne.aircurtairi:rezonirig stfrpt,doc"
cc:, County Attorney
F
Commur��ty Development Director.
Public WorksDirector
- Matthew Wynne
t
�5
i
t.
Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested change in zoning.
MOTION TO APPROVE:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC
HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS
SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I
HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND
THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT
APPROVAL TO THE APPLICATION OF WYNNE RANCH FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
FROM THE AG-5 (AGRICULTURAL — 1 DU/5 ACRES) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE U
(UTILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE.....
[CITE REASON WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
MOTION TO DENY:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC
HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS
SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I
HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND
THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE
APPLICATION OF WYNNE RANCH FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE AG-5
(AGRICULTURAL — 1 DU/5 ACRES) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE U (UTILITIES)
ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE.....
[CITE REASON WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
DATE' FILED:
SP NUMBER: A2 a). -a aj
REVIEW FEE:
CONCURRENCY FEE:
RECEIPT NO.: RESOLUTION NUMBER:
RECEIPT NO.: CERT. CAP. NO.:
6 Cliy ST. LUCIE COUNTY
;4 �c DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE, ROOM 201
FORT PIERCE, FL 34982-5652
F� OR 561-462-2822
APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONING
(does not include PUD, PNRD OR PMUD zoning)
DIRECTIONS
Please complete the requested information and submit all items to the St. Lucie County Department of Community Development, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 201,
FL Pierce, FL 34982. All applications must be accompanied by the proper non-refundable application fee. For additional details on the information necessary for a
submission of a site plan adjustment, please refer to Section 11.02.00, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. For assistance in submitting the application, please
contact the St Lucie County Department of Community Development, Planning Division.
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW FEES
PROPERTY SIZE
REVIEW FEE
REZONING WITH PLAN AMENDMENT
Less than 10 Acres
$ 500.00
$ 100.00 plus Plan Amendment Fee`
More than 10 acres
$ 800.00
$ 400.00 plus Plan Amendment Fee`
Concurrency Deferral Affidavit
$ 25.00
$ 25.00
for information about the. Comprehensive Plan amendment process and applicable fees, see application for comprehensive Plan Amendment
=ollowing notification that the application is complete, this petition will be scheduled for the next available Planning and Zoning
3ommission meeting. The Planning & Zoning Commission meets on the third Thursday of each month. Presentation to the Board of
3ounty Commissioners is dependent upon scheduling before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Please allow a minimum of 90
o 120 days for completion of the public hearing process following the certification of this petition.
nitial submissions shall include the following:
One (1) original of the completed rezoning application;
One (1) copy of a site plan graphic (minimum 8 1/2" x 11") or survey depicting the location of the proposed building;
One (1) copy of the St. Lucie County Property Tax Map (Scale 1:200) with the property under petition highlighted;
'PECIAL NOTE:
finder the provisions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a petition for a change in zoning is considered to be a
'RELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT ORDER. Under the definition of Preliminary Development Order, and consistent with the County's
oncurrency regulations, St. Lucie County neither warrants nor represents, that there is sufficient infrastructure available to meet the
xpected needs of the property on which the change in zoning is sought. Further, pursuant to Section 5.01.01(6)(3), St. Lucie County
and Development Code, a signed Concurrency Deferral Affidavit must accompany all applications for zoning changes and/or land
se amendments which acknowledges that no public facility capacity will be reserved for the subject property prior to the issuance of
Final Development Order. A determination of the availability of public facilities capacity is required prior to the issuance of such a
inal Development Order: For additional information on concurrency, please contact the Department of Community Development,
bom 201, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982.
LL APPLICATIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MUST BE COMPLETED AND FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE
:30 PM EACH BUSINESS DAY TO MEET APPLICABLE FILING DEADLINES. FOR AN APPLICATION SUBMISSION TO BE
ETERMINED COMPLETE, ALL REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMISSION.
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT INFORMATION
NAME
Wynne Ranch
ADDRESS
33200 Orange Avenue
Extension, Ft. Pierce,
FL 34945
PHONE
(772) 201-7500
_OCATIONPROPOSED FOR
2EZONING
North side of Orange
Maid Road near the western
Avenue Extension, West
boundary of St.
of Minute,
Lucie Co.
'ROPERTY TAX ID #
2105-111-0001-000/6
i
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (attach
extra sheets if necessary)
See Attached
�ECTION
TOWNSHIP
RANGE
ARCEL SIZE
ACRES
9-9
SQUARE FOOT
431,244
URRENT ZONING
ESIGNATION
AG-5
PROPOSED ZONING
DESIGNATION
U
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
AG-5
(ISTING USE OF PROPERTY
Agriculture - citrus
groves and pasture
A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/LAND USE AMENDMENT SOUGHT?
YES(
j NO f j
FOLLOWING INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE IS VERY IMPORTANT IN DETERMINING THE OUTCOME OF YOUR
NDITIONAL USE REQUEST. IT IS REQUIRED BY SECTION 11.06.00, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
1T APPROPRIATE FINDINGS BE MADE TO JUSTIFY A CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL. PLEASE USE ADDITIONAL
,ES, IF NECESSARY, TO JUSTIFY YOUR REQUEST.
Describe the reason for the requested change in zoning:
qee attached Addendum
>_ Is the,proposed rezoning in conflictwitti any poifion of the
Corn
pen Plan
= r
S0 ej. attfached ;Addendum.". .
k N. vu
How" is the"proposed change in zoning compatible with the existing uses in `the area?_
AM
t
Se`e.."attached Addendum
_Wm
z
tti i
ti )i
Y
How is the "proposed change in zoning compatible with the land Use des+gtiation on this property?
i
"
See "8ttach.ed Adtlend"u.m
What hate the area thaE in
-conditions changed in unmediate warrant consideration of.this change zon+ng?.
�f
S'eye, Attached A'dtlentlum
{
k L
�
4
What are tt�e anticipated.impacts of the proposed rezoning on"the existing and'futuro public facilikies in this area?` "
See: attached addendum_T _
What, are the;anticipated environmental impacts of the proposed rezoning? If;ho adverse impacts.ar� ankicipated, please
explain why.
See Attached 404"enduin
Will the proposed rezoning result in fan orderly and logical' development pattern?:, if yes, please explain why,
t
See Attached Addendum,
-
ST. LUCIC COUNLy
APPLICATION FOR rONOITIONAL USE PERMIT
SPECIAL NOTICE
(PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BELOW) s
Submission of this application does not constitute the granting of site plan approval. All appropriate requirements must be met prior to this project
)eing presented for approval to the appropriate authority. St. Lucie County reserves the right to request additional information to ensure a complete
�eview of this property/project.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
%pplicant Information (Property Developer) Agent Information
dame: Wynne Ranch Name:
Wdress: 33200 Orange Avenue Extension Address:
Ft Piercp, FI 34945
'hone: 201 _ 7 5 g g Fax: Phone: Fax:
'roperty Owner Information
his application will not be considered complete without the notarized signature of all lrooerty owners of record which shall serve as an
cknowledgment of the submission of thi lication for site plan approval. The property owner's signature below shall also serve as authorization
)r the above applicant or agent to o ehalf s ' ity owner.
roperfy Owner Signature. Property Owner Name (Pleea`e. isle ;4
la[ling Address:
t�Sc- F l-f 3 49 5
hone: (-Sal) � 7 f3 — ss-)3 e.4-T i Qz
TATE OF FLORIDA
OUNTY OF -- 1, 5E �uxju
ie foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this am
ly of J itnQ� , 20 OQ,, by
io is personally =knowntoor who has produced
4ientification. t
1ptur of Notary
Jett'-�Ir?i
pe or Print Name of Notary
Notaa Public Title
'e &&3qi Commission Number
Sal)
,,,•,�••,•,,, Jackie E. McDavid
Commission !# CC 963949
Expires AU R• 17.2003
�''
pttantia Sondin Co., Ins.
,,.
Project Reviewer.
DRC Review.
Approval Date:
Comments:
Pc
an
Jai
' C
cu
Pe
T
in
C Cl
of
12
3;(
set
i;aif
surrounding the facility.
4. The proposed change in zoning is both consistent with and compatible
with the agricultural land use designation on this property. Utilities is a
permitted zoning classification under the Agricultural Land Use designation.
5. The changes that warrant the consideration of this change in zoning are
multiple. They include the changing situation in St. Lucie County for the
disposal of land clearing debris. The change in zoning permits a very logical,
inexpensive and environmentally friendly disposal of land clearing debris.
Additionally, the facility hope to employ two to three employees directly
attendant with the operation of the air curtain incinerator. Due to the nature of
the air curtain incinerator, the agricultural, i.e. remote, setting of the property is
the best location for it.
b. There are no substantial impacts anticipated as a result of the rezoning, or the
issuance of the Conditional Use Permit on existing or future public facilities in
this area.
7. There are no substantial environmental impacts anticipated as a result of the
rezoning or the granting of the Conditional Use Permit. Certainly no adverse
impacts are anticipated. The air curtain incinerator meets or exceeds all EPA
Air Quality Emissions. The advanced system is extremely efficient, and does
not result in substantial residue. All residue is a natural residue and can be used
and marketed for multiple purposes. Port St. Lucie Tractor Service, Inc. intends
to spread all of the residue on the Wynne Ranch. Such action has an
environmentally desirable result. Additionally, a possible positive
environmental impact of the rezoning would be to keep approximately 3,000 to
4,300 tons of 'land clearing debris out of the County landfill per month. .
8. The rezoning and granting of the Conditional Use Permit will result in an
orderly and logical development pattern in light of the fact that the proposed
tract for rezoning is located within a 4000 acre total tract. By placing the facility
within the borders of the property, the applicant is attempting to minimize the
minimal impact that the facility would have on the adjoining landowners. Even
as the area develops, the impact will remain minimal. The subject area is in the
western portion of the County (west of Minute -Maid Road, near the Western
boundary of St. Lucie County), and it does not appear a likely area of residential
development in the near future absent an extension of public facilities or a major
investment of private money.
8: 37ntl LA!=rBON, NOBLE&b EBB If,
L N'
O p O • O O s 0 0. O. O• 01som'
LaWso-n. Noble & Webb, Inc. LB #667 :.
ENafNEERS. - PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peacock Boulawird, Suite 9,. Part St. Lucie, Floridq 34986
(5611 878-1700 - fox: (561) 878-1802 - email:'Inw—psl®Inw—ino.com
West Palm Beach - Port St. Lucie
DESCRIPTION TO ACGOMPANY SKETCH
DESCRIPTION:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER (1 /.4) OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35 - .
SOUTH, RANGE 37 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, F[;ORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: -
COMMENCE. AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 87-57'45" WEST, AS' A
BASIS OF BEARINGS.. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 2672.00 FEET TO -
THE. SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER. (1/4) OF SECTION 5: THENCE NORTH
00027'15" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER 0/4) OF SECTION 5, A
DISTANCE OF 1894.32 FEET- TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 0042 7' 1S" EAST
ALONG SAIDVEST LINE, A DISTANCE. OF 656.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'19'1(a- EAST, DEPARTING
SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 656.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'2T15' WEST, A DISTANCE OF
656.70 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89019116" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 656.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE OVER THE
WEST 25 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINING 9,900'ACRES. MORE'OR LESS.
SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR SKETCH
JOB No. 'B23401 `BY: GRB
0
1.\Data\2a0-299\p234\CAp\323talskndwg a;/26/2002 as,j6za2 AM ESr
CHECKED: GRB F.B.N/A PG_ N/A
SHEET 1 i
DATE:-35-02
J IWI 11 .R�ffwwlcnC> {olol.
6
C>
9
-i 14::,! oWf 2r !!Z? W i w
0
M-ml
g
Q
C,
4D
Cb
C>
C5
C>
4n
co
I
Z
Odo
C-31
MV
C,3
Y
' Section 3.01 03
Zoning District Use Regulations
t C
AG 5 AGRICiJLTURAL - 5' `#
9,
Purpose
;r
;
• -
The purpose of'this distract is to` -provide and protect pan environment, suitable .for productive
§ _
4} �+
commercial agriculture, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with
}
productive agricultural surroundings_:'_Residentlal densities: are _restracted to'. a `maximum of one
dwtilling unit'per fve gross acre7.-Jhe number in "(j" following each" identified use,corresponds
to
the SIC code reference described in Section 3 0102(B).';; The, number 999 applies to a use;
not
defined. under" the SIC. code but may, be further defined in Section 2:00.00 of this code: ".
2.
Permitted "Uses
a Agricultural production -crops
b Agricultural production `livestock &animals
.ecialties tozi
c, Agricultural services toa) P
d.. Family daycare homes ti
e. Family residentialhomes provided,that.such homes shall not be located within a radius of
s fi
orie thousand (1,OOOj;feet ofanother existing such familyesidential home and.provided that .
the sponsoring agency.or DePartment:of Health aind Rehabilitative'ervices (HRS) notifesY
theBoarmt hdCmsetimeof home occupancy that the home is licensed
by'HRS. tsssi
p
f: Fishing,. hunting &"trapping
"k R
toss
g, Forestry to8i,
h Kennels. ro752i
.
i Research Facilities, Noncommercial teioi "
Riding stables, nsssi
k. .;,togle-family detached dwellings ti;
j. Telecommwniration towers : subject to the standards of Section 7.1.0.23 easel "
( 3.
Lot Size Requirements
LoYsize requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4.
Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirementsshall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
5.
Off-street'Parking and Loading Requirements
Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to_Section 7.06.00.
6.
Landscaping Requirements
Laidscaping`Requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00
7.
Conditional Uses
a. Agricultural labor housing.;i,i
b. Aircraft storage and equipment maintenance.
(rio,) J
Adopted
August 1, 1990 98
Revised Through 08101l00
� Section 3 01. 03
V r`
Zornpg:District Use Regulations
;te
RN
Airports and flying landing, and take=off fields
tase,j
d Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand`(`1 000) feet of another such_
5/
faMA
mily residential home tsss� :
Me
�
e F'arm products warehousing and storage tazzvazzzi
����
Gasoline service stations (ssa,1
F
g. Industrial wastewatei disposal teas)
tY
h: Manufacty�rmg
(1,) Agficultural chemtcalstze>>.
2 Food &kindred products tzoi
�:
(3) Lumber& wood products, except furniture tzai
n
Ng
i Mining and quarrying of nbnmetallic.minerals, except fuels`.t,a�
aFt
j• Road trade - _
�- F<
(1) Farm equipment and telated accessories t9ssi3,
t ,
(Z), Apparel,& accessory stores tier
k Sewage disposal subject to the requtrements:of,Section 7 1;0,13
r
Ss �
Camps sporting and recreational tzo3zi
m Off Road Vehicle Parks; except go-cart raceway operation or rentals �sssi, subject to the
i tag
requirements of8ection 7 10 t�s),
n ' Outdoor shooting ranges, providing site, plan approvaLis obfaned according to the provisions
gf,Se;ctions 11 OZ 07 thi ough 11 OZ 09`and section 7.10.1,9 of, this Code:
,.` s .
p_
8 •
Accessory'
..
JA
x
.Uses.
M
Accessory uses a`re subtect to the requirement$ of Section 8:00 00; and include the following:,
r '
Zf
a Mobile homes s`ubtect jo;the requirements of,Sectiort.7 10 d5.
b R77 $tail trade and wholesale trade -subordinate to the pnmety authorized use or activity.
-
c, ' Guest douse subject to `the requirements of Section 710 04 tssst ;
'
a�
I.
Adopted August 1, 1990 99
Revised Through 08/01/00
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
W. U UTILITIES
1. Purpose
The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for utilities,
transportation, and communication facilities, together with such other uses as maybe compatible with
utility, transportation, and communication facility surroundings. The number in "()" following each
identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number
999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00
of this code.
2. Permitted Uses
a. Air transportation services (451.452)
�b. Agriculture, including farms, groves, and ranches. (01.02)
C. Communication. (48)
d. Electric services (491)
e. Electric transmission rights -of -way. (491)
f. Gas pipeline rights -of -way. (492)
g. Gas production and distribution (492)
h. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999)
i. Railroad, rapid rail transit, & street railway transportation. (40.41)
j. Sanitary services (495)
k. Transportation services (47)
I: Telecommunication towers = subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (9ss)
M. Water supply and irrigation systems. 494 4
9 Y ( . s7)
n. Water transportation (44)
3. Lot Size Requirements
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4. Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements
Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00.
6. Landscaping Requirements
Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.
7. Conditional Uses U
a. Airports. (45a)
b. Electric generation plants. (491)
C. Gas production plants. (492)
�>d. Land clearing and yard trash recycling operations - subject to the provisions of Section
Adopted August 1, 1990 130 Revised Through 08/01/00
FL
MM 3
iapi
Zohing District'(Jse Re ulaGorts ' 1k�
z M }
e Natural or>
manufactured gas storage"and distribution points (492) i
f ` Protective functions and their'related`activlties Correctional in&tituttons is�zsl",; nV�
9 Solid waste disposal tass3)��
h outdoor shooting ranges, provdln9 site pfan"approvai is o6tlned according to ttie provisions
of:Soctions 11 0 07 throtagh`i 1 02,09 and Section "? 10 "1"J of this Code,�.'tsssi"
v.
8.. Accessory Uses
�}
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8 00 OO:and include the following:.
a Automobile and track rental, services,
b. Restaurants:"(Including the sale of alcoholic leverages for on premises consumption oNy
U�
t9s9) �)
V.v,
� 5 r
�f� I
i r
�t
2:��
`� r
1' xe
s
1 �z
e�
_ �..
l
Adopted August 1, 1990 131 Revised Through 08/01/00
LO
co
CD
Oct%
M
♦
rr
C\j
ins
CD
>1
rr
cc
tj
w
AV 93(M]NY310
A,
kjS��
cc
is RM
3A
nrar
z as
PARKW Y
-41T
us
cn
an
uvol 0510ow
as raj
in
ax
QW)" Rl"s
GVOd WKS
am MM87
cr-
aroa 3
v]av3w
La
Qd 04010H 1W301
avow G33Ns
avou hollt"3
w
vs-3
MIIa
C)
voA
w
K I
SE I
s 9c L
KLNnoo
D3eOH:D33NO
Land Use Wynne Ranch
AG-5
S.R. No. 68 Orange Avenue
RZ 02-015:
This pattern indicates Map prepared Juy 26.2002
subject parcel
t
i
y�l
t
}
s�
�$ N,i7
4t1 _ 4 t i
t.
S
iN
3
P
}
't
Qf
s
O
RE
l
F..
chc Ro
r
W� i r
r y7f
t
�E
r
1
}
i
S.R. No. 68 Orange
Avenue
RZ
02--015
This attern indicates
p
._ � prevared guy 26.202
subject parcel
..�...�.a«�...w.e.�.�.d.oa..., N
�. .;,...�..,, d�.,.".�.a ...„.m
NJ
. 3 � +N � 8 [r�{;�i i+�3� i - � ,4�YJyrF� Wg��'iF � Z'iR�♦
ei f P t
<=
r
cr\ 1 ON (;P\ 0\
C� C�!
cli r
i G\ G\
(,q
C,
0\ oN o\ oN C\
m m
Cni
B W 0j 4)3 4)
if
-0
0 0 0 01 0
U U 0 Q
33
i
i -S, -14 -14
-�4 I
0.
: I
; i
o o o
o o o
if
crj ca c(s CrI
t A
Q) tu 0 0
i
C) C) C)
r-:; C-
zi
rJ,
C)
N N NiNr')
C-4 F4
eq r-
CIO W
:3�
W
M
COD cn
W
rarx
x X X
0 0 0 0
x i x x X
010 0 0
CQ co
X X
0 0
W W
cn U)
C, C>
Go
C>
rn 00
C> Co
Go
C>
0000
010000
0
C> CD
C> C>
C>
C.
CD C)
0 C)
(D
(D
i a a a.
a n.
00 00
00
00 00
00
US U 0 Q
0 0
rn C40 W C11
Q
0
rn
rA
P. V E V! v
COO
42 i 42 C2 12 12
00
cts cd 0
42
01 cr� cr cirl,"
UJ,
ljU,U U'U
UUlu 0 0 0 oto 0
U Ulu U*U U
C�; 61 C. C:I r- C, C.
tn > > > > i 0. 0 01 0 0 -0 -0 -of-0 -0
0 W: cn 0) wl V). I
=v cr-,, c=a M M CO M,? rn m
N 4) a 'rL) 0 0 r
C�d W� 1 (D V, '0' '0' V) a r- r. r-
(L) 0 C43 cu i m co ca r- r. r- C
0 > cd E E E
O 00 C", atoo
tn' kn,
\0�
(U 00, �o
> en oq! r -,6 r,�
J-1knim
kn
00; Im —fa, 3,n kn
C�
Oo en knn C) . \0 vn
ien (7, en
en M M
C> m ON 00 r- oo m 'IT 'IT \0 rniln cq
w C) C) C> C> c, t c> c- O CD
C> C> C) C, C) i C) C) C, C, C) C> C) C� C)
5
C> C) C> C> Cl
C,
C5 c; CD C) C> C> C> C> C. c=> c> C) C> c) c=>
C) (= C> CD <D C> c, Cl (1:
C> C) C> C) C> c:>
C) C> C) C) C> C) C> C) Cl
2i " — c,
rq
cl
C',
i C, 00
W1,00 00
s2-i J=)
2 12 0 rn i en (::> CD, cn m c, (2 121 c5
�q C', I C4 I eq
C14
i
13E
ST LUCIE OUNTY
PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION
'HEARING
- PUBLIC AGENDA
Aug4st:5 2002.,
TO WHOM IT MAY
i
CONCERN
e)
NOTICE, +s hereby grvep, m accordgnca wtjh Set(lon
11,00:03 the Lucie
5 WYi�NE RANCH for a Cond+tIonal Use Perme to allow
(he op jatlon of+aq Air'`CJrtam icme?btor in:the U (Utili-
'i 4
rr '� i rK
of $t County Land Deve(op�;e+it?Cor(e
and Hie
ties) Zamng"Di;(nctfo( a#4ilowmgtlescnbedpropetjy.,
j
-+7
provisions of the SG:LuGe GiV
oogly Comprelle
Plan; the following applFcanls have tegyestejl
Lucie County Planning consider
PA C l OF LA x D (TYING- IN • HE $OUTHEAST ONE
E E
{�
�;
and. Zoning Coinm+ssio�
their. following requests•
QUARTER (1%4)"QF SE_11C9 10$1 51. TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH;
�+
1 CHURCH OF -THE REDEEMER OF ST.LUCIE
RANGE 37 I A$T SST jUC1E COUNTY f(QRIDA (AND
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW&e
k} ;
: COUNTY
fqr d Change in.Zoning,from;:)hetRS-3,(Residential Single
jr � Family;- 3 du%ace)' Zoning0istriii'to"the I (inshtuflonal).,
=
[ COMMENCE qt TkItT. SOUTHEAST
SECTION,SsiHEC,E�SOUT�i
CORNER OF; SAID
87 5745� WEST A
.Y s
Zoning District for the following described prbperty
BASIS `OF' BEgRING$ 7ALONG
THE SOUTH, LINE OF
t
THE NW 1/41OF THE SWt,1/4 OF THE NW i%4 OF'
SAID SECTION'S A D(STPNCE OF 2672.00'FEET TO
THE SOUTHWEST CbRtfER OF SAID SOUTHEASLONE
+
SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH ,RANGE 40;EAST„
SL LUCIE COUNTY, fLORIDA LESS ROgp I{�GHT OF15"
GIUARTER (T/AI, OF `':$EC`(IQN °5 THENCE N0
FAST tALONC THE WEST LINE OF SAID/
I%
WAYS'AND FURTHER LESS THE EAST 300 FEETOf THE
'
$OUTHWERT�Q}IE,QUARTER (1/,4j OF SECTION 5,'A
SOUTH 210 FEET..
DISTANCE OF 189q 32 FEET TO THE POI OF BEGIN:-
Location Southeast corner of the in'tersedFpn of Selvttz,.
LNG T ENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00 2715'"EAST
N H
ALONG SAID WEST'41NE q•DfSTANCE OF 656.70
s
t s
RopddodEdwardsRoad•.
FEET THENCE $OUTH 89 191¢
EAST, pEPABTING
.
2 TIMOTHY AND DEBRA ROSE CAR WASH for a Cond+
SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 656.70FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°27 15 WEST A DISTANCis OF
"
bona) Use Permit to ollow,Hie operhiiory of a car wash
.
656 70 FEET iHENCE'NORTH 89°19 16" WEST, A DIS-,
facddy<n the CN (Cgmmercial} Neighborhood) Zaning pis'
'
TANCE OF 656 70 FEET TO THE " FOINT' OF;
fr+ct for the followuig de3u+beii' property:
BEGiNNiN
rt ,,
LOTS i j & 12, BLOCK 169 I:AKEWOOD PARK +UNIT
SUBIEGT TO AN EASEMENT .FOR, INGRESS ANC?
12A :A5 RECORDED IN PLAT;BOOK 11,PAGE 35; PUB-
LIC RECORDS OF ST,LUCIE
EGRESS AND PUBLIC; UTILITY AND DRAINAGE OVER-
'
l r
v COUNTY FLORIpA""
THE WEST 25 FEET'THEREOF -
i
Location 5321 Suns�ine StateParkwa Tom +ke Feeder
/'
MORE OR
P
Road y
.
CONTAINING 9,900,AGRES, LESS.
I GLASSMAN HOLDINGS, INC., for a Change in Zo�lmg
Location Nor(h sFde'df Orange Avenue; approximately
$ 75 miles wetf of NUnute Matd Road
'
from the Ae -1 (Agei6lturai - 1 Qu are)Zoning Dishjq to
the CG (Commercial Genevan Zoning Dishicf f& the fol-
6 QLORiDA_CENTER_FOR RECOVERY INC., fora co
lowing descrtbed.property
' tional Use.11ermd fo c1ldwSocial Servrces and Health Care
IN SECTION 15,` TOWNSHIP 34 RANGE 39 THE
Factlrties 1n. the 1 (Inshtuhonalj Zorimg District for the fo1-
lowing described property
SOUTFt 830 OF,THE EAST' 1550 OF THE $OUTH4/2
IJJ
OF NORTHEAST'')/4' LESS 'EAST 80'FT AND 'LESS
SOUTH 60 FT FOR'ROAD'ANQ fANAI R/W (6) (O R
WH)TE.CITY, .s/D 05°36�40 BEG AT NW,COR OF LOT
1.00 RUN E T35 Ffir R W 135 FT TH N Tq P68-LESS Rq
348 1874)
AbID CANAL R/W r (44) (1 72 AC) (MAP 34/OS$) (OR
LocationNorthwest comer of )he fitersedlpp of Indrto
1524-254d)< <
ty
O
Road and Emerson Avenue.
WHITE {ITY S/b 05°3640 THAT PART QF! LQT 106
' PART
N '
4 WYNNE RANCH for. a .Change m Zoo �rom'ihe _
ing
LYG E QF ORJA .AGE CANAL #).03 LESS'TWAT
LYG N gF1DRA(NAGE CANAL i'f103 AND N 130 FT
AG 5 (AgrituMural-1 du/5 acres) Zoning Oishid ta'ihe U
OF LbTS 112 AND 113 i YG E OF DRAINAGE •CANAL
(Uhhties)r Zoniag DisMd for': ahe following desoribed
°o
#103 AND:'[tU OF;IOT 107 =LESS .RD,AND CANAL
:
:-
R/W {10 45 AC) (MAP 34/O5S) (OR 1524-2594)
3 €
A f ARCEL OF t AND (PING IN THE SOU7ryFAT dNE
(oon 3$1 West 1v11dyray Road
a
QUARTER (1/4) bh;S", ON 5,-TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH,
RANGE ;37 EA$I . ST LUCIE:
4O(1NTY, FLQJNDA M(p
$EIN�iv�OREP4RTICULARLYOESCRIBED/15FOkOVI/Si
FUBL(C HEARINGS -will be hold in Commission Chambers;
Roger Pashas Annex,;2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort .Pierce
.
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
florida on August 15;-'1002, beginning at 700'P M. or, as
S�GTJON 5 THENCE SOUTH:87°5T45-:WEST AS 'A
-
soon- thereafter as possible
L'
BASIS OF BEARINGS ALONG THE SOIhH LINE OF
PURSUANT: TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, 'd
SAID SECTION 5 A DISTANCE qF 26T200 FEET -TO
THE SO�ITHWEST CORNER'OF:SAID SOUTHEAST ONE
+cl
"n decTdbs tp Appeal any decision mada;by a board
"QUARTER
(1/4): 'OF. SECT(ON S. '.THENCE NORTH
ageRyy;.ar°mmissiori'with re;pact to any.mctter.tarisid
aed eta nleeling or Mearing,.he will to ed d record of ttie
F—
i
00°2T15" EAST, ALONG THE WEST. UNE OF.S'AIO
SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER {i/4) OF S.ECTION'S, A
Di 'in and ftiaf'forsuckputposes, he may need, to
ensyre that a rerbcfim record of'the.proceedings is in.
m .
t '.
t
DISTANCE OF 1894.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN-
NING .THENCE CONTINUE NORTH, 00°2T15 EAST
I which rated )ndudeS:'the testimony and evidence u- h
"to
ALONG SAID WEST LINE A: DISTANCE, QF 656 70
which the appeal is be' based.
,.
"
fEEi THENCE -SOUTH 89°19'f6 .EAST b ,RTING
SAID, -WE ST LINE, ,IA 'DISTANCE '.O'F '656.i0
f
PLANNINO,AND'ZONINGCOMMISSION
'FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 0042T15" WEST A DISTANCE OF
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
/S/ Stefan Matthes, CHAIRMAN
656, 70 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89°19'16"WEST; A,D1S-
TANCE• Of 656.70 FEET TO THE,' POINT ..OF.
BEGINNING.. '-
publish: August 1, 2002-
2487476
SUB.ECT.' TO' AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND
,
EGRESS :AND PUBLIC UTILITY ANDN DRAINAGE OVER
THE WEST.25 FEET THEREOF. `
CONTAINING 9,906. ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Location. " North side of Orange Avenue, approximately
5.75 miles west of. fvlieufe Maid Road.
l
-
: �
i
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 8/15/02
�c\E' CpG
File Number CU-02-008
0011
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division
R
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM:
Planning Manager
DATE:
August 10, 2002
SUBJECT:
Application of Wynne Ranch/ Air. Curtain Incinerator for a`Conditional
Use Permit to allow the operation of an air curtain incinerator for the
disposal of land clearing debris in the U (Utilities) Zoning District.
LOCATION:
North side of Orange,'Avenue, approximately 5 3/4 miles
west of -Minute Maid:Road;and north one mile from the-
-
entrancato Wynne Ranch (Tax ID# 2105-111-0001-000/6)
EXISTING ZONING: `
U (Utilities) (See RZ 02-015)
FUTURE LAND USE:
AG-5 (Agricultural — 5)
PARCEL SIZE:
Parent Parcel 671.32 acres
I
Petitioned Area 9.9 acres
PROPOSED USE:
The purpose of the requested Conditional Use Permit is to
allow the operation. of an air curtain ;incinerator, for the
disposal of land clearing debris. This use would be,
authorized under the provisions of Section
3.01.03(W)(7)(g), Solid Waste Disposal
SURROUNDING ZONING:
AG-5 (Agricultural —1 du/5 acres) surrounds the petitioned
property to the north, south, east and west.
SURROUNDING LAND
I
USES: The existing uses in this area are agriculture in nature.
FIRE/EMS PROTECTION:
Station 11 (3501 Shinn Road), is located approximately 8
miles to the 'southeast.
UTILITY SERVICE:
On site wells will provide water service. On site sewer will
be provided through a septic tank.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
RIGHT-OF-WAY
_ ADEQUACY:
i
I i
The existing right-of-way for Orange Avenue is 200 feet.
August 10, 2002 Petition: Wynne Ranch/ Air Curtain Incinerator
Page 4 File No.: CU-02-008
downwind side of the pit. The chances of a spark escaping into the atmosphere and
igniting other material outside the pit are considered to be remote.
The air curtain incinerator residue (specifically wood ash) can be recycled as a soil
additive that can be marketed to plant nurseries, farms, etc., as a potting soil additive.
The applicant has indicated that the subject area will be buffered on all sides by no more
than 1,400 feet of existing producing citrus groves. Therefore, no visual impact from the
facility on the surrounding residences are expected from this operation.
COMMENTS
The petitioner, Wynne Ranch, has applied for the requested Conditional Use Permit in order to
operate an air curtain incinerator for the disposal of land clearing debris on a 9.9 acres of land
located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 5 3/4 miles west of Minute Maid
Road and north one mile from the entrance to Wynne Ranch. This operation would be located
in an area zoned U (Utilities), as previously addressed by this Board in petition RZ-02-011. This
particular use would be authorized under the provisions of Section 3.01.03(W)(7)(g), Solid
Waste Disposal
An air curtain incinerator as defined by Chapter 17.256, F.A.C., is a portable or stationary
combustion device that directs a plane of high velocity forced draft air through a manifold head
into a pit with vertical walls in such a manner as to maintain a curtain of air over the surface of
the pit and a recirculating motion of air under the curtain. The air curtain incinerator is designed
to destroy trees, brush and stumps in a safe controlled burning process.
The proposed unit is to be powered by a 6-cylinder diesel engine that drives a 20,000 CFM
centrifugal fan. Air is forced out restricted outlets of the 35-foot manifold. The airflow is forced
across the top and down into the trench or pit. The curtain of air acts as a top for the incinerator
and provides oxygen, which produces a fire that maintains an average temperature between
2,0000 to 2,8000 Fahrenheit. The oxygen flow coupled with the 360 degree rotation of the air in
the trench or pit creates an after burner effect. By recirculating the air under the curtain,
residence time is increased long enough for almost all organic compounds to be destroyed with
very little smoke or ash escaping. The chances of a spark escaping into the atmosphere from
the trench or pit and igniting other material outside the pit are remote.
The petitioner has indicated that the hours of operation for the air curtain incinerator will be from
7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. According to the Florida Department of Environmental regulations
outlined in Chapter 62-156, F.A.C., the land clearing debris cannot be ignited before 9:00 a.m.
and must be extinguished one hour before sunset.
Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the
St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this
petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to
the following conditions:
F
July`29, 2002 Subject: 'Proposed Ft. Pierce Annexations
Page 7 "-Sheraton Plaza/Sapp Road
Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested "conditional use.
MOTION TO APPROVE:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,.
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS,_AND'THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.07.0.3, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,' I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. "LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNT COMMISSI NERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE
APPLICATION OF R A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF AN AIR CURTAIN INCINERATOR IN THE U.
(UTILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE...
I [CITE°REASON(S) WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]`
MOTION TO DENY:
I
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING;
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF, REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN.
SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE' I HEREBY MOVE
i
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT.THE ST. LUCIE
i
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF PORT ST.
I LUCIE TRACTOR SERVICE, INC., FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE
OPERATION OF AN AIR CURTAIN INCINERATORIN THE U (UTILITIES) ZONING
DISTRICT, BECAUSE...
[CITE -REASONS) WHY = PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]
i
t
c. Application of asphalt, water, oil, chemicals or other dust suppressants to unpaved roads, yards, open stock piles and similar
activities.
d. Removal of particulate matter from roads and other paved areas under.the control of the owner or operator of the facility to
prevent reentrainment, and from buildings or work areas to prevent particulate from becoming airborne.
c. Landscaping or planting of vegetation.
C. Use of hoods; fans,`filters, and similar equipment to contain, capture and/or vent particulate matter.
g. Confining. abrasive blasting where possible.
h. Gn Jo ure or covering of conveyor systems.
4. In determining what constitutes reasonable precautions fora particular facility, the Department shall consider the cost of the
control technique or work practice, the environmental impacts of the technique or practice, and the degree of reduction of emissions
expected from a particular technique or practice.
Specific Authority 403:061 FS. Law implemented 403.021, 403.031, 403.061, 403.087 FS. Histor}-Formerly 17-2.620, 17-296:320, Amended
1-146, Amended 3-13-96.
62-296.401 Incinerators.
(1) Any incinerator with a charging rate of less than 50 tons per day.
(a) No visible emission (5 percent opacity) except that visible emissions not exceeding 20 percent opacity are allowed for up to
three minutes in any one hour period.
(b) No objectionable odor allowed.
(cy Test Methods and Procedures. All emissions tests performed,pursuantto the requirements of this rule shall comply with the
following requirements.
1. The testmethod for visible emissions shall be DEP Method 9, incorporated in Chapter 62-297,, F.A.C.
2 Test procedures shall meet all applicable requirements of Chapter 62-297, F.A.C.
(2) Eicisting incinerators•other than those whichare operated or utilized for the disposal or treatment of biological waste, with
a charging rate dqual;to or greater than 50 tons per day.
j (a) Particulate matter--'0.1 grains per standard cubic foot dry gas corrected to SO percent excess air.
(b) No olijectiotiable odor allowed:
(c) Test Methods _and Procedures. All emissions tests performed pursuant to the requirements of this rote shall comply -with
following requirements.
1: The test method for particulate emissions shall be EPA Method 5, incorporated and adopted 6y reference in Chapter 62-297,
F.A.C. The minimum sample volume shall be 30 dry standard cubic feet. EPA Method 3 or3A, using Orsat analysis is required for
percent excess air correction,
2. Test procedures. shall meet all applicable requirements of Chapter 62-297, F A,C.
(d) Calculations Correcting Concentrations to 50% Excess Air (EA), EPA Method 3, Section 1.2. When correcting a pollutant
emission concentration to'50% excess air, pursuant to this rule, the.following equation shall be used:
Cs50 = Cs (100 + %EAl
150
Equation 296.401-1
where: Cs50 is the pollutant concentration at 50% excess air;
Cs is the pollutant'concentration computed at standard conditions on a dry basis; and %EA is calculated by equation
296401-2: `
%EA = f% o02 - 0.56/oCO) x 100
IC 0.2640/oN2 -. (%02- 0.50/.CO)
Equation 296.401-2
(3) New Jncinerators, other than those which are operated or utilized for the disposal or treatment of biological waste, with a
charging rate equal to or greater than 50 tons per day:
(a) Particulate matter — .08 grains per standard cubic foot dry gas corrected to 50 percent excess air.
(b) No objectionable odor allowed
(c) Test Methods and Procedures. All emissions tests performed pursuant to the requirements of this rule shall comply with the
following requirements.
I. The test method for particulate emissions shall be EPA Method 5, incorporated and adopted by reference in Chapter 62-297,
F.A.C. The minimum sample volume shall be 30 dry standard cubic feet. EPA Method 3 or 3A, using Orsat analysis is required for
percent excess air correction.
2. Test procedures shall meet all applicable requirements of Chapter 62-297, F.A.C.
(d) Calculations Correcting Concentrations to 50% Excess Air.(EA), EPA Method 3, Section 1.2. When correcting a pollutant
emission concentration to 50% excess air, pursuant to this rule, the following equation shall be used:
Cs50 = Cs (100 + %oEA)
150
i
i
_ 327
I
I
Equation 296.401`-1
where: Cs50 is'the pollutant concentration at 506/6 excess air;
Cs is the pollutant concentration computed at standard conditions on a dry basis; ;and %EA is calculated by equation
296:401-2:
%EA = (0/602 0.50/.CO) X 100
0.2640/oN2 - (%02 - 0.5%CO
Equation 296.401-2
(4) Biological Waste Incineration Facilities.. The following requirements-apply.to all biological waste incineration facilities.
This rule does not apply to facilities licensed under the provisions of Chapter 470, F$., which cremate human remains for which a
Department of Health death certificate has been issued or fetal remains in circumstances when a fetal death certificate is not issued'
Under Chapter 382, F.S. This rule also does not apply to animal crematories as defined in Rule 62-210.200, F.A.C.
(a) Facilities with a capacity equal to or less than 500'pounds per hour.
1. Particulate matter emissions shall not exceed .0.100 grains per dry standard cubic foot of flue gas, corrected to 7% 02;
2. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) emissions shall not exceed 40 pounds per hour.
(b) Facilities with a capacity greater than 500 pounds per hour, ,but less'than or equal to 2,000 pounds per hour.
1. Particulate.matter emissions shall not exceed 0.030 grains per drystandard cubic foot of flue gas; corrected to'7% OZ.
2. Hydrochloric' acid (HCI) emissions shall not exceed 40 pounds per hour; or shall be reduced by 90% by weight on an hourly
average basis.
.(c) Facilities with a capacity greater than 2000 pounds per hour.
1. Particulate matter emissions shall not exceed 0.026 grains per dry standard cubic foot of flue gas, corrected to 7% 02, .
2. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) emissions shall not exceed 50 parts per million by volume, dry basis, corrected to 7% 02 on a three
hour average basis; or shall:be reduced by 90oby weight on an hourly average basis.
(d)All facilities unless otherwise noted are subject to the following design, operating, monitoring and operator training
requirements.
1. Any incinerator subject to Rule 62 296.401(4), E.A.C., shall operate with a combustion zone design temperature of no less
than t $00 degrees Fahrenheit for at least a 1;0 second gas.residence.time. in the secondary (or last) combustion chamber. Primary
chamber and stack shall not be utilized in calculating this residence tune.
2. MechaWcally fed facilities shall incorporate an air lock system.to prevent;opening the incinerator to the room environment.
The :volume of the loadiatg system shall; be dcsigged to prevent overcliatging thereby assuring compl6te combustion of the Waste.-.
3. Carbon monoxide (CQ) emissions shall not exceed loo parts 'per million by volume, dry basis, corrected to`7% 02 on an
hourly average basis.'
4. incineration or. ignition of waste shall not begin until the secondary(or;last) combustion chamber temperature requirement is
attained Ail air pollution control grid continuous emission monitoring equipment shall be .operational and` functioning properly
prior to the inciueratiomor"ignition of waste and until all the wastes are_incineri" The secondary (or.last) combustion chamber.
temperature requirement shall be maintained until the wastes are completely combusted.
S. Radioactive waste ntay not be.burned in. an incinerator subject to` this rule unless the incinerator has been issued,a
Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services.(D M-S) license to incinerate radioactive waste or the waste is of such quantity to
j be exempt in:accordance with DHRSRula 1013-91 or. IOD-104.003, F.A.C.
6. Hazardous waste tnay:not be'bumed in an incinerator subject to this rule unless the incinerator has been issued a hazardous
waste permit by the Department or, the waste is of such quantity to be exempt in accordance with Chapter 62-730, F.A.C.
7. Any operator of an incinerator subject to Rule 62-296,401(4), F.A.C., shall be trained by the equipment manufacturer's
representative or an equivalent organization.using a state -approved training program. ,
a. The content of the training program shall be submitted to the Department for approval. Construction permit applicants shalt ,
submit a training program, or reference's previously submitted training program, with the construction permit application: The
training shall provide a basic understanding' of the principles of the combustion process, provide instruction on proper operating
practices and procedures, and increase awareness of regulation requirements and safety concerns: Training programs shah. be a
minimum of.16 hours of instruction: The Department shall approve training. programs which meet, at a minimum, the criteria set
forth in the :EPA Medicat Waste Incinerator Operator Training Program Course Handbook EPA 453B-93-018 and Instructor's
Guide EPA 453B-93-019. .
b. A copy of the training certificate for each, operator having, satisfactorily completed the Department -approved training
program must be �submitted.to the Department within 15 'days of training. If the incinerator is modified to the extent that a
Department construction permit is required, the operators shall be retrained to operate the modified incinerator. Owners of new and -
modified incinerators shall submit copies of the operator raining aertiftcates within 15 days after completion of the initial
compliance test.
c. An operator's certificate must be kept on file at -the facilityfor the duration of the operator's employment and for an
additional two years after. termination of employment. The owner shall not allow the incinerator to be operated unless it is operated'
by an operator who has satisfactorily` completed the required training program:
j
i
_ 328
i
I
(e) Test Methods and Procedures. All emissions tests performed pursuant to the requirements of this rule shall comply with the'
following requirements.
1. The test method for visible emissions shall be DEP Method 9, incorporated in Chapter 627297, F.A.C.
2. The test method for carbon monoxide shall be EPA Method 10, incorporated and adopted by reference in Chapter 62-297, „
F.A.C.
3. The; test method foe oxygen shall be EPA,Method 3 or 3A, incorporated and adopted by reference in Chapter 62-297, F.A.C.,
4. The test method fbrparticulate emissions shall be EPA Method 5 or 26A, incorporated and adopted by reference in Chapter
62-297, F.A.C. The minimum sample volume shall be 30 dry standard cubic feet.
5. The. test method for. hydrochloric acid shall be EPA Method 26 or 26A, incorporated and adopted by reference in Chapter
62-297, F.A.C. '
6. Test procedures shall .mcet all applicable requirements of Chapter 62-297, F.A.C.
(f) Frequency of Testing.
1, Facilities with a capacity equal to or less than 500 pounds per;hour shall demonstrate compliance as follows.
a. New and existing facilities shall demonstrate' individual emissions unit compliance with the visible emissions standard upon
initial compliance and annually thereafter.
b. New and existing facilities shall demonstrate individual emissions unit compliance with the remaining applicable standards
upon initial' compliance and prior to renewing the'operation permit. -
2. New'and existing facilities with a capacity greater than500 pounds per hour shall demonstrate individual source compliance
with the applicable standards upon initial compliance and annually thereafter.
(g) Continuous Emissions Monitoring Requirements. Each owner or operator of a biological waste incineration facility ,shall
install, operate; and maintain in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions continuous emission. monitoring equipment.
1 The moni(ors,shall record the following operating parameters.
a Secondary(orIlast) combustion chamber exit temperature.
b. Oxygen (for facilities with a capacity greater than 500 pounds per hour).
2. A complete file of all measurements, including continuous emissions monitoring system, monitoring 'device, and
performance testing measurements; all continuous emissions monitoring system performance: evaluations; all continuous emissions
monitoring system or.-ntonito_ting device calibration checks; ariijustments and maintenance performed on these. systems or devices;
and all other information required, shall be tecorded.m apermauent legible form available for irtspection. The file shall be retained
for at least two years following the date of such measurements; maintenance, toorts and records. '
(S) Human Crematories. The following requirements apply to all. human crematory facilities.
(a) Particulate matter emissions shall not exceed 0.080 groins per dry standard cubic foot of flue gas, corrected to 7% 02.
(b) Carbon monoxide (CO) emissions shall not exceed 100 parts per million by volume, dry basis; Corrected to 7% Oy on an
hourly average basis.
(C) Crematory.units for which:a complete application for a permit to construct anew unit was received by the Department on or
after August 30, 1989 shall provide &e ign_caleWadons to confirm. a sufficient volume in the secondary chamber combustion` zone
to provide for at least a 1.0 second gas residence'time at.. degrees )+ahrenheit. The actual operating temperature of the
secondary chamber. Combustion zone shall be no less than 1600 degrees Fahrenheit throughout the combustion process in the
primary chamber. PrIniary chamber and stack shall not be :used in calculating this residence time. Cremation i.'the primary
chamber shall not begin unless the secondary chamber combustion zone temperature is equal to or greater than I600 degrees
Fahrenheit
(d) Crematory units for which construction began or for which a complete application for a permit to construct a new unit was
received by the Department prior to August 30, 1989, shall provide design calculations to confirm a sufficient volume. in the
secondary chamber combustion zone to provide for at least a'lA'second gas residence, time at1600 degrees Fahrenheit. The actual
operating temperature of the secondary chamber combustion zone shall be no less than 1400 degrees Fahrenheit throughout the
combustion process in the primary: chamber. Primary chamber and stack shall not be used in calculating this residence. time.
Cremation in the primary chamber shall not begin unless the secondary chamber combustion zone temperature is equal to or. greater,
than 1400 degrees Fahrenheit.
(e) Human crematories shall cremate only dead human bodies with appropriate containers. The bodies may be clothed, The
containers may contain no more than 0,5 percent by weight chlorinated plastics as demonstrated by the manufacturer's data sheet. If
containers are incinerated, documentation from the manufacturers certifying that they are composed of 0.5 percent or less by weight
chlorinated plastics must be kept on -file at the site for the duration of their use and for at least two years after their use. This
documentation must also be submitted with any application for an initial or renewal air operation permit or air general permitZVI
notification form. No other materiali including biomedical waste as defined in Rule 62-210.200, F A.C., shall be incinerated.
(f) All crematory operators shall be trained by the equipment manufacturer's representatives or another qualified organization.
Only operators trained by a Department -approved training program shall be allowed to operate a human crematory. -
1. The content of the training program shall be submitted to the Department forr approval through the permitting process.
Construction permit applicants shall submit a training program or reference a previously approved training program with the
construction permitapplication. The training shall provide a basic understanding of the principles of the combustion process,
I
I
329
I
provide instruction ou the operation and maintenance of the crematory unit, and increase awareness of regulatory requirements and
safety concerns. 7raining programs shall be a minimum of 8 hours of instruction. Training programs shall at a minimum include
hands-on experience involving start-up, operation of at least one cremation, shut -`down of the equipment, and one full cycle of
preventive maintenance actions. The Department shall approve traininm g progras which meet, at a minimum, he criteria applicable
to .cremation set forth in the EPA Medical Waste Incinerator Operator Training Program Course Handbook, EPA 453/13-93-018,
and Instructor's Guide, EPA 453/13-93-01.9.
2. A copy of the training certificate for each operator having satisfactorily completed the Department -approved training
program must be submitted to the Department within 15 days of training. The owner of any new.or:modified crematory unit shall
submit copies of the operator training certificates :within 15 days after completion of the initial compliance test pursuant to theunit's
air Construction permit: If a crematory unit is modified.to the extent that -a Department air construction permit is required, the.'
operators shall.be retrained to operate the modified unit.
3. An operator's' certificate must be kept on ;file at the facility for the duration of the operator's employment and :for an
additional two years after tenninat'ton of employment.
(g) Test Methods and Procedures. All emissions tests performed pursuant to the requirements of this rule: shall comply with the
following requirements.
1. The test method for visible emissions shall be DEP Method 9, incorporated in Chapter 62-297, F.A.C.
2. The test method for carbon monoxide shall be EPA'Method 10, incorporated and adopted.by reference in Chapter 62-297,
F.A.C.
3. The test method for oxygen shall be EPA Method 3, incorporated and adopted.by reference in Chapter 627297, F.A:G .
4. The test method for particulate emissions shall be EPA Method 5, incorporated and adopted by reference inChapter 62-297,
F.A.C. The minimum sample volume shalhbe 30 dry standard cubic feet.
5. Test, procedures shall meet all applicable requirements of Chapter 62.07, F.A.C.
(h) Operation >During Compliance 'Test Testing of ,emissions shall be conducted with 'the source operating at the
manufacturer's recommended capacity.
(i) Frequency of Testing.
1. New and existing facilities shall demonstrate individual source compliance with the visible emissions standard upon initial
compliance' and annually thereafter Facilities permitted, putsuant,to Rule 62 7 .00(4), F.A.C., Air General Permits, `shall
demonstrate compliance, within 60 days prior to the submittal date of the air, general permit notification form and within 60 ;days
prior to each inniveraary of such date.
2. New and existing facilities shall demonstrate iindO jdual source compliance with the xemaming, applicable standards upon
iniiiai compliance and prior to -renewing the operating pemut ot, if the facility is permitted pursuant to Rule 62-210:300(4), p:A:C.,
Air General ;Permits, wrthin 60 days prior.to the submittal date of the air general permit notification form
(j) Compliance Demonstration.. Facilities may demonstrate compliance with the carbon mgnoXide and particulate emissions
standards by submissiosof a test report for anidentical-(same make,' model, and capacity) Crematory unit operating=in compliance
with a valid Department air permit and tested pursuant to that pernnL The test data in the test report must be less than five years old
and may or may not be obtained from the unit that is being permitted.
(k) Continuous Emissions Monitoring Requirements. Each crematory facility shall install, operate; and maintain continuous
monitors to record temperature at the point or beyond where 1.0 second gas residence timo is obtained in the secondary chamber
combustion zone in accordance with the'manufacturer's instructions; A complete file of all:_ measurements, including continuous
monitoring ;system, monitoring device, and- performance testing measurements; atl':eontinuous monitoring' system performance
evaluatcons;;all continuous monitoring system or monitoring device calibration checks; and adjustments, preventive maintenance,
and corrective maintenance performed on these systems or. devices, shall be recorded in.a. permanent legible form available for
inspection. Continuous temperahue monitoring documentation shall.include ;operator name, operator indication of when cremation
V in the primarychamber begins, date; time, and temperature markings The file shall be retained�for at least two years following the
recording of such measurements, maintenance, reports, and records.
(6) Animal Crematories, The following requirements apply to all animal crematory facilities.
(a) Particulate matter emissions shall not exceed'0.080 grains per dry standard cubic foot of flue gas, corrected to 7% OZ
(b) Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions shall not exceed 100, parts per million by volume, dry basis, corrected to 7% 02 on an
hourly average basis:
(C) Crematory units ,for -which a complete application for a permitto construct anew unit was received by the Department on or
after August 30, 1989, shall provide design calculations to confirm a sufficient volume in the secondary chamber combustion zone
to provide for at least a 1.0 second gas residence time it, 1800 degrees Fahrenheit The "actual' operating temperature of the
secondary chamber combustion zone shall be no less than 1600 degrees Fahrenheit throughout the combustion process in the
primary chamber. Primary chamber and stack shall not be used in calculating this residence time. Cremation in the primary
chamber shall not begin unless the secondary chamber combustion zone temperature is equal to or greater than 1600 degrees
Fahrenheit.
,I
i
- 330
i
fa
t _
T.
(d) Crematory units for which construction began or for"which a complete application for a permit to construct a new unit was
received by, the Department prior. to August 30,.19891 shall provide design calculations'to confirm a sufficient volume in the
secondary chamber combustion zone to provide for at least a 1.0 second gas residence t►me'at'1ri00"degrees Fahrenheit. The actual
operating te►t►perature of the secondary chamber combustion zone shall be no less than 1400 degrees Fahrenheit throughout the
combustion process>in the"primary chamber. Primary chamber and stack shall not 'be'used in: calculating. this residence time:
Cremation inthe primary chamber shall not begin unless thesecondary chamber combustion zone iemperature is equal.to orgreater
than 1400 degrees Fahrenheit.
"associated
(e) Aniuial .crematories shall cremate only dead animals and, if applicable, the bedding and the remains with the
animals, placed in leak -proof containers, Containers may contain no more than 0.5 percent by weight. chlorinated plastics. Plastic
bags used for the cremation of animals shall'be nonchlorinated and no less than'3 mils thick. If containers are: incinerated,
documentation' from the manufacturers certifying that they are composed of 05 percent or less by weight chlorinated plastics must
be. kept on -file at the site for the duration of their use and for at least two years after their use. This documentation must also be
submitted with any application for an initial or renewal, Air operation permit or. air general permit notification form.
"(f) Animal crematories`shall not cremate,dead animals which were used for medical:or commercial experimentation. No other
material, including biomedical waste as defined in Rule:62-2`10.200, F:A.C., shall be --incinerated.
(g) All crematory operators shall be trained by the equipment manufacturer's representatives or another qualified organization.
Only operators "trained by aDepartment-approved training program shall be allowed to" operate anattintal crematory.
1. The content of the training program shall be submitted to the Department for approval through the permitting process.
Construction,, permit<_applicants shall submit a training program or reference a previously.; approved training program with the
construction permit application. The training shall provide a basic understanding of the principles of the combustion process,
provide instruction on the operation and maintenance of the crematory unit, and increase awareness of regulatory requirements and
safety concerns. Training programs shall be a minimum vf 8 hours of instruction. Training programs shall at,a minimum include
hands-on experience involving start=up, operation of at least one cremation, shut -down of the equipment; 'and one `full `cycle of
preventive maintenance actions. The'Aepartm. ent shalt approve training programs which meet, at a minimum,.the criteria applicable
"ford
to cremation"set in the SPA Medical Waste Incinerator Operator Training program Course Handbook, EPA 453%8493-018,
and Instructor's Guide, EPA 453B-93-019:
2. A copy of the training certificate for each operator; having satisfactorily completed the ?epartment: approved training
program, must be subulxtted to the Department within:l S days of training. The owner of any Clew or triodifietl crematory unit shall "
submit copies of the d tAtot training c ertificates within 1 S:days aftereompl',66n of the initial compliaoce test pursuant to the unit's `
air" construction permit If a: crematory unit is modified to the extent that a Department air" construction permit is required; the
operators shall be cetrarned to. operate the modified unit.
3: An operator's certificate must be kept on file at the facility' for the duration of the bperatot's employment and for an
additional two years after ten aination of employment:
(h) Test Methods";and Procedures. All emissions tests performed pursuant to the requirements of this rule shall comply with the
following requirements.
1 The test method for visible emissions shall be DEP Method 9, incorporated in Chapter 62=297, F.A.C. r
2. The test method for carbon monoxide shall be EPA Method 10, incorporated and adopted by reference in Chapter 62-297,
I F.A.C.
. 3. The test method for oxygen shall be EPA Method 3, incorporated and adopted by reference in Chapter 62-297, F.A.C. .
4. The test method for particulate emissions shall be EPA Method S, incorporated and adopted by reference in Chapter 62-297,
F A.C: The minimum sample volume shall be,30 dry standard cubic feet
5. Test procedures shall meet all applicable requirements, of Chapter 62-297, F.A.C.
` (i) Operation During"ComplianceTest. Testing of emissions shall be conductedmith the source operating at the manufacturer's
recommended capacity,
(j) Frequency of Testing.,.
1. New and existing facilities shall demonstrate individual source compliance with the visible emissions standard upon initial
compliance and annually thereafter.. Facilities permitted. pursuant to Rule 62-210.300(4), F.A.C., Air General Permits, shall
demonstrate compliance within 60 days prior, to the submittal date of the air general permit notification form and within 60 days
prior to each anniversary of such date.
2. New and existing facilities shall demonstrate individual source compliance with the remaining applicable standards upon
initial compliance'and prior to renewing the operating permit or, if the facility is permitted pursuant to Rule 62-210.300(4), F.A.C., '
Air General Permits, within60 days prior to the submittal date of the air general permit notification form.
(k) Compliance Demonstration. Animal crematories may demonstrate compliance with the carbon monoxide and particulate
emissions standards by submission of a test report for an identical (same make, model, and capacity) crematory air pern it and
tested pursuant to that permit.. The test -data in the test report must be less than five years old and may or may not be obtained from
the unit that is being permitted.
(1)Continuous Emissions Monitoring Requirements. Each animal crematory shall install, operate, "and maintain continuous
monitors to record temperature at the point or beyond where 1.0 second gas residence time is obtained in the secondary chamber
combustion zone in -accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. A complete file of all measurements,: including continuous
,I
` - 331
I
f
vrrl�;t:UJ!_ UNLY:
DATE FILED:
- CUO� 00
SP NUMBER:
REVIEW FEE: RECEIPT NO.: RESOLUTION NUMBER:
CONCURRENCY FEE: RECEIPT NO.: CERT. CAP. NO.:
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
co 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE, ROOM 201
FORT PIERCE, FL 34982-5652
( Q < 561-462-2822
R1
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTAL
Please complete the requested information and submit all items to the St. Lucie County Department of Community Development, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 201.
Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. All applications must be accompanied by the proper non-refundable application fee. For additional details on the information necessary for a
sut.�mission of a site plan adjustment, please refer to Section 11.02.00. St. Lucie County Land Development Code. For assistance in submitting the application, please
contact the St. Lucie County Department of Community Development, Planning Division.
CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FEES
PROPERTY SIZE
REVIEW FEE
CONCURRENCY FEE
Less than 10 Acres
$ 500.00
$ 25.00
More than 10 acres
$ 800.00
$ 25.00
Following notification that the application is complete, this petition will be scheduled for the next available Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting. The Planning & Zoning Commission meets on the third Thursday of each month. Presentation to the Board of
County Commissioners is dependent upon scheduling: before the -Planning and Zoning Commission. Please allow a minimum of 90
to 120 days for completion of the public hearing process following the certification of this petition.
Initial submissions shall include the following:
1) One (1) original of the completed conditional use permit'application;
2) One (1) copy of a site plan graphic (minimum 8 112" x 11") or survey depicting the location of the proposed building;
3) One (1) copy of the St. Lucie County Property Tax Map (Scale 1:200) with the property under petition highlighted;
SPECIAL NOTE:
Under the provisions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a petition for a conditional use is considered to be a
FINAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER. Under the definition of Final Development Order, and consistent with the County's
concurrency regulations, sufficient capacities must be demonstrated in all areas of required level of service before this petition
can be approved. Should it be determined that insufficient services exist, no- Final Development Order will be issued until the
cited insufficiencies are corrected. For additional information on concurrency, please contact the Department of Community
Development, Room 201, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982.
Some Conditional se applications will require the submission of a site plan in conjunction with the Conditional Use review. No
scheduling of the Conditional Use review before the Planning & Zoning Commission can be authorized until- the site plan is
determined by the Development Review Committee to be completed and consistent with applicable County code., For
additional information, please contact the Department of Community Development, Planning Division, Room 203, 2300 Virginia
Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982.
ALL APPLICATIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MUST BE COMPLETED AND FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE
4:30 PM EACH BUSINESS DAY TO MEET APPLICABLE FILING DEADLINES. FOR AN APPLICATION SUBMISSION TO BE
DETERMINED COMPLETE, ALL REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMISSION.
Ct
PROJECT INFORMATION
PPLICANT INFORMATION
NAME
Ranch
ADDRESS
33200 Orange Avenue Extension, Ft. Pierce,
FL 34945
PHONE
772 201-7500
LOCATION PROPOSED FOR
CONDITIONAL USE
orth side of Orange Avenue Extension, West of inute
laid Road near the western boundary of St. Lucie Co.
i
i
PROPERTY TAX ID #
2105-111-0001-000/6
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (attach
extra sheets if necessary)
i
I.
i
I>
ECTION
5
TOWNSHIP
3 5 S
RANGE
37E
PARCEL SIZE
ACRES
19.9
SQUARE FOOT
2 4 4 f'
ONING DISTRICT
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
AG-5
DESIRED CONDITIONAL USE
AG=5
j:
j
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY
Agriculture. - citrus groves and pasture
IS A CHANGE.IN ZONING SOUGHT
WITH THE PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE? YES[ j
NO [ ]
IS A CHANGE IN LAND USE SOUGHT WITH THE PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE? YES[ ]
j
NO(XX
IS A SITE PLAN APPROVAL SOUGHT WITH THE PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE? YES[ ]
NO[ XX I I(
I THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE IS VERY IMPORTANT IN DETERMINING THE OUTCOME OF YOUR..
CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST. IT IS REQUIRED BY SECTION 11.06.00, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;
THAT APPROPRIATE FINDINGS BE MADE TO JUSTIFY A CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL, PLEASE USE ADDITIONAL j
PAGES, 1F NECESSARY, TO JUSTIFY YOUR REQUEST.
j
i
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONCURRENCY DEFERRAL AFFIDAVIT
Fee: $25.00
1, Matthew Wynna , residing or doing business at 22200 venue Extensior
Name S reet
Ft Pierce ,—Fl 24945201:-750" have applied for
City State Zip Code Phone
a Conditional Use Permit
Type of Development Order
following Project:
Wynne Ranch -
Name of Proposed Development
from St. Lucie County, Florida, for the
I do hereby affirm that in connection with my application for the above project, I have elected to
defer the certificate of capacity and reservation of capacity in public facilities for- the above
property until a later time, but no later than the application for a final development order for the
same property.
I understand and acknowledge that the above listed property will be subject to the certificate of
capacity before any final development order can be issued, and that St. Lucie County can make
no guarantee that adequate -public facilities will be available when I apply for the final
development order.
I further acknowledge that according to Section 5.01.01 of the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code, no final development approval can be granted until capacity in those
facilities is available at that time. The issuance of a preliminary development order without a
certificate of capaci reates no vested o other rights to develop the subject property.
SIGNED: DATE:
Applica
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF ST.. LUCIE
Before me; the undersigned authority personally appeared,,tya#& 1 Lm
who upon being duly sworn, deposes -and says sworn to and subscribed before me thiY VIP
day ofq�200
0—to LMy Commission expires: 11,7 02l1
tary Public
Witness Witness -
4/13/01
Jackie E. 140avid
Commission 0 W 863948
• Expires Aug. 17, 2003
a4. Bonded Thm
Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc.
ASA
ADDENDUM TO PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
1. Wynne Ranch, (herein "Developer") has been doing business in St. Lucie
County for approximately 30 years. For Business relationship purposes with.
Port St. Lucie Tractor Service, Inc., Developer has found it desirable to obtain
an air curtain incinerator to dispose of their (Port St. Lucie Tractor Service, Inc.)
land clearing debris. Only vegetative waste will be disposed of at this site.
Currently, under County zoning regulations, Developer can only have an air
curtain incinerator on land that is zoned Utilities with a Conditional Use
Permit.
The DEP has advised Port St. Lucie Tractor Service, Inc. that air curtain
incinerators are authorized and within the guidelines of DEP Regulations.
Currently, Port St. Lucie Tractor Service, Inc. hauls approximately 15 - 18 loads
of land clearing debris to a landfill per day. Each load weighs approximately 10 -
12 tons. Consequently, Port St. Lucie Tractor Service, Inc. generates between
3,00 and 4,300 tons of land clearing debris per month. By allowing Developer to
set up an air curtain incinerator, the County would be able to keep between 3,00
and 4,300 tons of land clearing debris out of the land fill per month.
Developer intends to use approximately 9.9 acres of a 4000 acre parcel for the air
curtain incinerator. This parcel is the furthest land West in St. Lucie County
and is an extremely remote area. The site is located one mile north of Orange
Avenue and 1,400 feet west of the east property line of the Developer's
remaining parcel The entire 9.9 acres is surrounded by an existing, producing
commercial citrus grove. Accordingly, there is a complete buffer between the
site and any adjacent property owned by others, that is not less than 1,400 feet
wide. The remaining property will be used for agricultural purposes, including
production of citrus fruit and pasture land.
2. The proposed rezoning is not in conflict with any portion of the St. Lucie
County Land Development Code or the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.
3. The surrounding property is currently being used for agricultural
purposes. There are very few residences in the vicinity, and Developer has
attempted to locate the subject site as far away from existing residences as
possible. Additionally, Developer will use the existing citrus groves as a buffer
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
i�
W.
U UTILITIES
1.
Purpose
The, purpose of :;this district is to provide and protect an environment, suitable for utilities,
transportation; and communication facilities, together with such other uses as.may be compatible with
utility, transportation, and" communicationfacility surroundings. The number in "O'' following each.
identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01'.02(B). The number
999.applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may further defined in Section 2.00.00
of this code.
2.
Permitted Uses
a. Air transportation services (451.452)
b. Agriculture, including farms, groves, and ranches. (01.02)
c: Communication:'(ae)
d. Electric services tag»
e. Electric transmission -rights -of -way. (491)
f. Gas pipeline rights -of -way. ta921
g. Gas production and distribution, 492)
h. Industrial wastewater disposal. (9s9)
i, Railroad, rapid rail transit, &"street railway transportation.t4o,4,1�
-
Sanita services ass
J. c ry: r
k. Transportation services (47)
(
L; Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (wg)
m. Water supply, and irrigation systems. (494,497)
n. Water transportation (44)
3.
Lot Size Requirements
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4
Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00, .
5.
Off -.street Parking and Loading Requirements
Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06,00
6.
Landscaping Requirements
Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.
7.
Conditional `Uses
a. Airports. tasel .
b. `" Electric generation plants. (491)
c. Gas production plants..t49z1
d. Land clearing and yard trash recycling operations - subject to the provisions of Section
Adopted August-1. 1990 130 Revised Through 08/01/00
I
U
00Tk
ON
N
m
u
O
21
tl
N
N
`
I
Q�
CD
►
~�
ot
�t
alcr
Ali
a
a�
'LS
tN tou`
t
vet
��
Nagy
�
�'
tit•
•
t�CN W
P 0�
P
f
!
cc
9
Is—p4sz--
rf
NYM/
3a
i
�
15
m
P
as
g {i
♦1
N
!lr
w
�>
W
W
f
y
O
n
in
M
UVOU NOISNHOC
al
ad rel
rbr
ix
F—
roa
ar3�n
D
W X1MS1g0aB
0
j
oroa N«s
Q
U
�
Oroa
3N3 3'1Xra
aroa 3ooure al
jsett
aroa WW3 a30r3X
W
Z
W
k
Otl aNa3aX 1r30i
m
�
M
N
ff aroa 033XS
aroa Xollar3
M
ac
z
FJ O
Q
zZ
�✓ �V
K-3 lvw3
_
O U
L- O
O J
W
W
F
M
Qa'O
M
0�
S
►i 1
S SE 1
S 9£ 1
)dNnoo
3190HO33NO
A Petition of Wynne Ranch for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation
of an Air Curtain Incinerator in the U (Utilities) Zoning District.
S.R. No.68 Orange Avenue
-T-
C U 02-008�.
This pattern indicates Map prepared Juy 26, 2002
subject parcel N
- =77
77,jl
a
ag
7TP6-'.'!7 T51
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes To allow the operation of an Air Curtain Incinerator in the U (Utilities)
the Following Zoning District.
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 5.75 miles west of Minute
Located At: Maid Road.
Currently Zoned. AG-5 (Agricultural - 1 du/ 5 acres)
Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
Date: Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CU-02-008 Wynne Ranch)
ST. LUCIE COUNTY.
PLANNING AND ZONING' COMMISSION"':
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
August 15, 2002:..
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE'is hereby- given in accordance. with Section
11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code
and the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive
Plan, the following: applicants have requested that the St.
Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission consider
their following requests:
I. CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY
for a Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single -
Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning.District to the (Institutional); Hi
Zoning District for the,following described property.
THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST;
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS ROAD RIGHT-OF-1
WAYS AND FURTHER LESS THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE'
SOUTH 210 FEET.
Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Selvitz;
Road and Edwards Road
2. TIMOTF(Y AND DEBRA ROSE CAR WASH, for a Condi-
tional Use Permit to allow the operation of a car, wash"
facility in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning'Dis-
trict for the following described property: -
LOTS 11 & 12, BLOCK 169,LAKEWOOD PARK,. -UNIT
12A, AS RECORDED IN PLAT: BOOK 11, PAGE 35, PUB-
LIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA.'
Location:5321 Sunshine State Parkway /•Turnpike Feeder
Road.
3. GLASSMAN.HOLDINGSNNC., fora Change in Zoning
from the AG4 (Agriar8ura(- 1 idu/acre).Zoning District to
the CG (Commercial,GeneraQ Zoning Districtfor the fol-
lowing described:propeity.
IN SECTION' T5�. TOWNSHIP:34,. RANGE 39, THE
SOUTH -830 :OF,THE FIST 1550' OF: THE_SOUTH,•1/2.
OF NORTHEAST:�'1/4 LESS EAST 80`FT-:AND LESS
SOUTH 60 FT.;FOR ROAD.:AND: CANAL R�W .(6) (O.R.
348-1874rq.
;
Location: Northwest tamef of he.- "irsection'of- Indrio
Road.dnd EmersonAvemte,..:
4..WYNNE RANCH far c'Change in:'Zoning j,om.the
AG-5 (Agricultural. 1 du/SicidQ aiiing`Dtatrici hYthe U
(Utilities) Zoning Distrkf for the following described
propejtY
QUARTER (1/4) bFc$ELflON 5 TOWNSHIP 35:SOUTH,
RANGE: 3? .RASX A j, QEjjf rb0,K) -FL©RIDA ANO
BEING MORE,PARTKULARWY DESCRIBEDAS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT`IHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 5 THENCE SOM*B7°5r45" WEST; AS 'A
BASIS OF BEARINGS !AL'ONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID SECTION_5;aA DISTANCE OF 2672.00 FEET -TO
THE SOUTHWESTCORNER'OF SAID SOI ITHEAST.ONE
QUARTER (1/4) OF.SECTION 5'.THENCE_NORTH
00°2T15" .EAST, ALONG. THE WEST: LINE ,OFF: SAID,
SOUTHWEST.Oi4E*QUARltR,(1/4) OF SECTION 5, A
-DISTANCE OF 1894.32 FEET30 THE.PbINT OF BEGIN-
NING,. THENCE CONTINUE -•NORTH '00°2T15" EAST
ALONG SAID .:VTEST I NI . A. DISTANCE OF; .656:70
FEET;: THENCE; SOUTH 89°19'16" .EAST DEPARTING
SAID. WEST ;.LINE, A DISTANCE OF,..656.70 -FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°2T15" WEST, A .DISTANCE OF
656.70 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89*19116. WEST A DIS-
TANCE .OF 656:70 : FEET T.O:-THE .' POINT ,OF
BEGINNING..
SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT- FOR:" INGRESS AND
EGRESS AND. PUBLIC. UTILITY AND DRAINAGE OVER
THE WEST 25,FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINING 9,900 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Location- North'side of Orange Avenue, approximately
5.75 miles west of Mimite Maid Road.
5. WYNNE RANCH, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow
the operation of an Air Curtain Incinerator in the U (Utili-
ties) Zoning District for the following described property:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE
QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH,
RANGE 37 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 87°57'45" WEST, AS A
BASIS OF BEARINGS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 2672.00 FEET TO
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE
QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH
00°27'15" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 5, A
DISTANCE OF 1894.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN-
NING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00°27'15" EAST
ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 656.70
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°19'16" EAST, DEPARTING
SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 656.70 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°27'15". WEST, A DISTANCE OF.
656.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°19.16" WEST; A DIS-
TANCE OF 656J0 FEET. TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. _
SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT .FOR INGRESS. AND
EGRESS AND PUBLIC.UTILITY AND'DRAINAGE OVER
THE WEST 25 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINING 9,900 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Location:: North side of Orange Avenue] approximately
5,75 miles west of Minute Maid Road.,
6. FLORIDA CENTER FOR, RECOVERY,;INC,,.for a Corfdi-
tional Use Permit to allo vS*ial Services and Health Care
Facilitiesin the 1 (institutional),Zoning Aistricf,for. the fol-
,lowing described-propedy
W
WHITE CITY S/D 05°3646" BEG•ATNW'COR OF LOT
100 RUN E.135 FT,.TH W.,135-FT TH N.TO;P,OB=LESSRD
AND CANAL R/W:= (44) (1.72 AC) (MAP�34105S) (OR
1524-2594) : C� `
WHITE CITY.S/D.05°36'40"'THAT PART.OF LOT' 106 `O.
LYG E OF DRAINAGE CANAL 9101 - LESS THAT PART.
w_
LYG N OF:DRAINAGE`CANAL:#IQ3- AND N,130 FT T^
OF.LOTS.-I12.AND 113 LYG'EOE DRAINAGE•CANAL In
#103 AND'ALL OF LOT -107--`LESS RD:AND CANAL
R/GV - (10.45 AC) (MAP,34/05S).(OR 152d 2594) 7..
`Q
Locatiom 3451 West NUdway :Road co
PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in Commission Chambers' .'v
Roger Poitras Annex, ',2300 Virginia Avenue; Fort .Pierce L
Florida on August IS,* 2002 beginning at 7-00 P.M. or as t
soon thereafter as possible. (-
PURSUANT :TO Section 286 0105 Florida Stptutes, .rf al : r:_
person decides to appeal any_decisfon made by -a board I
•agency, wcommission - nmh reaped fo any, matter consid
erect at a meeting -or hearing, ib will need a record of the1 Fa._
proceedings, and that, for:such.
purposes, he nlay ------ tb.:
ensure that verbatim record of the.proceedings is rude
which record includes the testimony and -evidence upoh
which the appeal is to be based.-
.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
/S/ Stefan Mafthes, CHAIRMAN
Publish: August 1, 2002
2487476
S-Series
Refractory Walled Air Curtain Burners
Models S-127 • S-121 • S-116 • S-111
PRODUCT OVERVIEW
Air Burners, LLC has a track record in the air curtain incineration business
that spans more than thirty years. Our systems have been used
throughout the USA , Canada and overseas, primarily for the disposal of
wood waste (debris)from land clearing efforts, forestfuels reduction, wood
product manufacturing and from natural disasters, such as hurricanes,
tornados and floods. Our air curtain burners are also often used for the
disposal of diseased animal carcasses (i.e. CWD, FMD). We also offer a
line of distinctly different air curtain burners, our T-Series trench burners.
The S-Series machines are portable systems (transportable by low -boy
trailer, "Landoll" truck, etc.) utilizing a refractory walled enclosure. They
are completely self contained and do not require any setup or tear -down.
S-Series units can be used for portable applications as well as semi-
permanent applications. Standard system dimensions are shown below.
Custom systems are also available to meet specific needs.
Model Overall Size
Fire Box
Weight
LxWxH
LxWxH
S-127 37' 4" x 11' 9" x 10' 3"
27' x 8' 4" x8' 1"
50,000 lbs.
S-127E 11.40m x 3.78m x 3.13m
8.20m x 2.50m x 2.45m
22,600kg
S-121 32' 2" x 11' 9" x10' 3" 21' x 8' 4" x 8' 1" 41,000 lbs.
S-121 E 9. 80m x 3. 78m x 3.13m 6.40m x 2. 50m x 2.45m 18, 600kg
S-116
27' x 7' 5" x7' 5"
16' x 5' x 6'
26,000 lbs.
S-116E
8.23m x 2.30m x 2.30m
4.90m x 1.50m x 1.80m
11,800kg
S-111
22' x 7' 5" x7' 5"
11' x 5' x 6'
21,000lbs.
S-111 E
6.60m x 2.30m x 2.30m
3.35m x 1.50m x 1.80m
9, 500kg
Suffix "E" denotes electric version
Diesel Engine Version:
Engine: John Deere Industrial
Fuel Tank: 100 Gallon (378 L) Diesel Fuel,
except S-116 & S-111: 30 Gallons (136 L)
Electrical: 12 Volts DC
Drive System: Mechanical PTO 4-Belt Drive
Electric Motor Version:
Motor: 3-Phase, heavy-duty, with enclosed controller;
Max 480V, 50Hz or 60Hz
Direct coupling drive
Options: Under -fire air supply (surcharge applies)
Heat recovery (surcharge applies)
NOTE: All weights and dimensions are approximate.
Detail specifications and dimensional drawings can be provided on request.
11-01
dnk
Air Burners, LLC
4390 Cargo. Way,
Palm City, Florida .3690
PH (561) 220.7=
Fax (561) 220-7W2
E-Mail: info@airbumers:com
www.airbumers.com
Air Burners, LLC
Air Curtain Burner Price List 2002
Effective January 7., 2002
MODE_
TYPE
PRICE $
T-35.0
Mobile - Trench Burner (Diesel) Trailer or Skid
5-350
Mounted; 35 ft (10.7 m):Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
35,973
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter: Additional $195.00
Mobile - Trench -Bum*er: (Diesel) Trailer Mounted
T-200
20 ft (6.2 m) Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
25,850
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter: $195.00
S-111
Portable -Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel)
53,992
w/Combustion -Box. 11 ft (3.35 m)
S-116
Portable = Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel) '
59,830
w/Combustion Box 16 ft (4.9 m)
S-1 6E
Portable - Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
61,590
w/Combustion -Box 16 ft (4.9 m)
S-121
Portable - Refractory Walled.- Self Contained (Diesel)
94,727
w/Combustion Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
S-121 E
Portable - Refractory Walled- Self Contained (Electric)
99,298
w/Combustion Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
S-127
Portable - Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel)
104,872
w/Combustion Box 27 ft (4.2 m)
S-127E
Portable = 'Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
109,765
w/Combustion Box 27 ft .8.2 m
Prices:
Prices are in US dollars FOB Air Bumers, LCC Factory in Palm City, Florida, USA (North of West Palm
Beach). Systems are made in the USA, completely assembled (T-350/200 requires set-up).
Payment Terns:
50% Down Payment with order, balance upon completion of system and before shipment, or
irrevocable UC in US Dollars, confirmed by a major US Bank. Financing available (US and Overseas).
Delivery (unless in stock):
Depending on model and our order backlog when order is placed, stock to 4-5 weeks ARO.
Warranties:
The limited Air Burners, LOG factory warranty is one year, and the engine and fan manufacturers
provide their own warranties for their units which will be registered in clients name. Extended
Warranties for John Deere engines available at a surcharge from Deere & Company.
NOTE: Dimensions approximate. Shipping and loading/rigging, if applicable, not included.
Prices subject to change without notice. This price list supercedes all previous price lists.
Rev. 0102.0
IldJJ.) J-J.J
Air Burners, LLC
4390 Cargo. Way,
Palm City, Florida .=90
PH (561) 220.7303
Fax (561) 220-7=
E-Mail: infoOairbumers com
www.airbumers.com
Air Burners, LLC
Air Curtain Burner Price- List 2002
Effective January 7., 2002
MOREL
TYPE
PRICE $
T-35.0
Mobile - Trench Burner (Diesel) Trailer or Skid
S-350
Mounted; 35 ft (10.7 m)'. Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
35,973
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter: Additional $195.00
Mobile - Trench -Burner (Diesel) Trailer Mounted
T-200
20 ft (6.2 m) Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
25,850
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter:.$195.00
S-111
Portable, - Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel)
53 992
w/Combustion -Box. 11 ft (3.35 m)
'
S-116
Portable = Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel) '
59,830
w/Combustion Box 16 ft (4.9 m)
S-116E
Portable - Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
61,590
w/Combustion .Box 16 ft (4.9 rn)
S-121
Portable - Refractory Walled.- Self Contained (Diesel)
94,727
w/Combustion Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
S-121 E
Portable'- Refractory Walled- Self Contained (Electric)
99'298
w/Combustion Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
S-127
Portable -: Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel).
104,872
w/Combustion Box 27 ft (8.2 m)
S-127E
Portable = Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
109,765
w/Combustion Box 27 ft .8.2 m
Prices:
Prices are in US dollars FOB Air Burners, LCC Factory in Palm City, Florida, USA (North of West Palm
Beach). Systems are made in the USA, completely assembled (T-350/200 requires set-up).
Payment Terms:
50°/, Down Payment with order, balance upon completion of system and before shipment, or
irrevocable L/C in US Dollars, confirmed by a major US Bank. Financing available (US and Overseas).
Delivery (unless in stock):
Depending on model and our order backlog when order is placed, stock to 4-5 weeks ARO.
Warranties:
The limited Air Burners, LCC factory warranty is one year, and the engine and fan manufacturers
provide their own warranties for their units which will be registered in client's name. Extended
Warranties for John Deere engines available at a surcharge from Deere & Company.
NOTE: Dimensions approximate. Shipping and loading/rigging, if applicable, not included.
Prices subject to change without notice. This price list supercedes all previoLks price lists.
Rev. 0102.0
416P� UP
Air Burners, LL+C
4390 Cargo. Way,
Palm City, Florida 3690
PH (561) 220-7303
Fax (561) 220-7W2
E-Mail: infoOairbumera:com
www.airbumers.com
Air Burners, LLC
Air Curtain Burner Price- List 2002
Effective January 7., 2002
MOREL
TYPE
PRICE $
T-35.0
Mobile - Trench Bumer (Diesel) Trailer or Skid
5* 350
Mounted; 35 ft (10.7 m).Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
35,973
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter: Additional $195.90
Mobile - Trench Burn'er{Diesel) Trailer Mounted
T-200
20 ft (6.2 rn) Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
25,850
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter: $195.00
S-111
Portable - Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel)
53 992
w/Combustion Box.11 ft (3.35 m)
'
S-116
Portable = Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel) '
59,830
w/Combustion Box 16 ft (4.9 m)
S-116E
Portable -- Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
61,590
w/Combustion Box 16 ft (4.9 m)
S-121
Portable - Refractory Walled.- Self Contained (Diesel)
94,727
w/Combustion Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
S-121 E
Portable'- Refractory Walled- Self Contained (Electric)
99,298
WCombustion Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
S-127
Portable = Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel),
104,87.2
w/Combustion Box 27 ft (8.2 m)
ES-127-E
Portableefractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
109,765
w/Combustion Box 27 ft .8.2 m
Prices:
Prices are in US dollars FOB Air Burners, LCC Factory in Palm City, Florida, USA (North of West Palm
Beach). Systems are made in the USA, completely assembled (T-350/200 requires set-up).
Payment Terms:
50% Down Payment with order, balance upon completion of system and before shipment, or
irrevocable UC in US Dollars, confirmed by a major US Bank. Financing available (US and Overseas).
Delivery (unless in stock):
Depending on model and our order backlog when order is placed, stock to 4-5 weeks ARO.
Warranties:
The limited Air Burners, LCC factory warranty is one year, and the engine and fan manufacturers
provide their own warranties for their units which will be registered in client's name. Extended
Warranties for John Deere engines available at a surcharge from Deere & Company.
NOTE: Dimensions approximate. Shipping and loading/rigging, if applicable, not included.
Prices subject to change without notice. This price list supercedes all previous price lists.
Rev. 0102.0
T-Series
Mobile Air Curtain Trench Burners
Models T-350 • T-200 & S-350 • S-200
PRODUCT OVERVIEW
Air Burners, LLC has a track record in the air curtain incineration business that
spans more than thirty years. Our systems have been used throughout the
USA, Canada and overseas, primarily for the disposal of wood waste (debris)
from land clearing efforts, forest fuels reduction, wood product manufacturing
and from natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornados and floods. Our air
curtain burners are also often used for the disposal of diseased animal
carcasses (i.e. CWD, FMD). We also offer a line of distinctly different air
curtain burners, our portable self contained S-Series with refractory walled fire
boxes.
Our T-Series Trench Burner is a mobile (trailer mounted) pit burner which is
used in combination with an earthen pit or trench made to function as the fire
box. The T- Series is also offered as skid mounted versions, called the S-350
and S-200, respectively. The basic operation is the same as the trailer -
mounted Series, except that it is mounted on skids. Standard system
dimensions are shown below. Custom systems are also available to meet
specific needs.
I Description T-350 S-350 I
Length of Trailer 18' 9"
Height of Trailer 8-7-
Width of Trailer 8' 2"
Manifold Length 35'
Approx. Setback (Unit to Pit) 36'
Weight 7,800 lbs.
Engine
Fuel Tank 50 Gallon
Electrical
Drive System
s
Electrical
Drive System
(5.70m) 15' 8" (4.80m)
(2.60m) 8' 3" (2.51m)
(2.50m) 7' 4" (2.24m)
(10.70m) 35' (10.70m)
(11.00m) 36' (11.00m)
(3,520kg) 9,500lbs. (4,300kg)
John Deere Diesel (6 Cylinders)
(189 L) 100 Gallons (378 L)
12 Volts DC
Mechanical PTO 4-Belt Drive
I Description T-200 S-200 I
Length of Skid Unit
Height of Skid Unit
Width of Skid Unit
Manifold Length
16' 3" (5.00m) 13' 5" (4.00m)
7' 5" (1.85m) 7' (1.85m)
8' 2" (2.50m) 8' (2.40m)
20' (6m) 20' (6m)
Approx. Setback (Unit to Pit) 20' (6m) 20' (6m)
Weight 6,000lbs. (2,800kg) 8,200lbs. (3,700kg)
Engine John Deere Diesel (4 Cylinders)
Fuel Tank 30 Gallons (136 L) 50 Gallons (189 L)
Electrical 12 Volts DC
Drive System
Mechanical PTO Direct Coupling Drive
NOTE: All weights and dimensions are approximate.
Detail specifications and dimensional drawings can be provided on request.
11-01
12 Volts DC
Mechanical PTO 4-Belt Drive
I Description T-200 S-200 I
Length of Skid Unit
Height of Skid Unit
Width of Skid Unit
Manifold Length
16' 3" (5.00m) 13' 5" (4.00m)
7' 5" (1.85m) 7' (1.85m)
8' 2" (2.50m) 8' (2.40m)
20' (6m) 20' (6m)
Approx. Setback (Unit to Pit) 20' (6m) 20' (6m)
Weight 6,000lbs. (2,800kg) 8,200lbs. (3,700kg)
Engine John Deere Diesel (4 Cylinders)
Fuel Tank 30 Gallons (136 L) 50 Gallons (189 L)
Electrical 12 Volts DC
Drive System
Mechanical PTO Direct Coupling Drive
NOTE: All weights and dimensions are approximate.
Detail specifications and dimensional drawings can be provided on request.
11-01
Approx. Setback (Unit to Pit) 20' (6m) 20' (6m)
Weight 6,000lbs. (2,800kg) 8,200lbs. (3,700kg)
Engine John Deere Diesel (4 Cylinders)
Fuel Tank 30 Gallons (136 L) 50 Gallons (189 L)
Electrical 12 Volts DC
Drive System
Mechanical PTO Direct Coupling Drive
NOTE: All weights and dimensions are approximate.
Detail specifications and dimensional drawings can be provided on request.
11-01
T-Series
Air Curtain
Trench Burners
T-350 & T-200
Mobile Trailer Mounted
& Skid Mounted
Ebb
SERIES SELF
CON�II�NED UNIT
1. The Conditional Use Permit will have a term of 5 years
and shall "sunset" at the end of 5 years.
2. The incinerator will be used only for vegetative
material from St. Lucie Co., delivered to the site by
trucks owned and operated by Port St. Lucie Tractor.
No other commercial use of the incinerator will be allowed.
3. The Conditional Use Permit is limited to "one" above-
ground air curtain incinerator approved by DEP
114-KA 8 o 0 uc. r-n er I/
Air Burners
Portable and Mobile
Air Curtain Burners
Air Curtain Destructors/Incinerators
Refractory Walled Fire Boxes
Trench Burners
Pit Burners
Custom Trailer Packages (Fire Box, Trailer & Excavator)
Serving the Heavy Equipment - Construction - Land Clearing - Waste Management -
Wood Manufacturing - Forestry - Agriculture - Disaster Recovery - Animal Disease
Control Industries for more than 30 Years
Company Information
System Specifications
Visit our Web Site at:
www.airburners.com
Factory and Main Office (US)
Air Burners, LLC
4390 Cargo Way
Palm City, FL 34990, USA
Phone (561) 220 -7303
FAX (561) 220 -7302
E-mail: info@airbumers.com
© 1998-2002 Air Burners, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Subject to change without notice. Some dimensions approximate. Metric conversions rounded.
Rev. 02-02-02
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Company Profile .............................. Page 1
Product Overview ......................................... Page 2
The Principle of Air Curtain Burning .......................... Page 4
S-Series................................................. Page 6
T-Series.................................................. Page11
MP-116 Trailer Package ................................... Page18
ME
COMPANY PROFILE
Air Burners, LLC is the number one manufacturer of Air Curtain Incineration Systems in
the world. We hold the patents on air curtain burners, and for over thirty years we have
been building the best and most rugged machines in the industry. Our units employ
very high temperatures that safely and efficiently reduce wood and other vegetative
waste to a residual ash.
Air Burners' systems are typically used in the construction industry to support land
clearing operations and demolition debris removal, for forest fire mitigation and at landfill
sites to help reduce the reliance on costly landfills by reducing wood waste and similar
such waste streams. They are also used for clearing the aftermath from storm or flood
damage; and to dispose of (diseased) animal carcasses, including BSE, foot-and-mouth
disease or CWD affected carcasses.
All of the systems we manufacture are either mobile or portable. The T-Series (T-350
or T-200) trench burner is trailer mounted, and, as the skid -mounted S-350, requires an
earthen trench or pit. The T-Series units have been designed for easy mobilization and
set-up. We have designed and build the machine to withstand the rigors of typical
construction site work.
The skid -mounted S-Series machines are self-contained with a refractory lined fire box.
They are designed for field use or semi -stationary placement, except for the S-350
trench burner. The refractory lined fire box allows for more controlled burns without the
need for an earthen pit or trench. The S-Series units are loaded over the top, except for
the S-350 trench burner. The twin doors at the rear of the machine allow for ash
removal or the unit can be dragged on its skids around the site, leaving the residual ash
behind. The fire box has no bottom.
Air Burners, LLC has two manufacturing facilities. The main factory is in Palm City,
Florida (North of West Palm Beach) and the other facility is in Malaysia. This allows us
to quickly and economically service a worldwide market. Our engineering staff uses the
latest 3D CAD software for our equipment designs. We can quickly accommodate
changes to support our customers' particular requirements.
The employees of Air Burners are dedicated to maintaining the high standard of design
and manufacturing that has made us the recognized leader in air curtain burner
equipment. We look forward to working on your next project.
Page 1
EM
PRODUCT OVERVIEW
Air Burners, LLC has a track record in the air curtain incinerator business that spans
more than thirty years. Our systems have been used throughout the USA, Canada and
overseas, primarily for the disposal of wood waste (debris) from land clearing efforts,
wood product manufacturing and from natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornados
and floods, but often also for the disposal of diseased animal carcasses. Air Burners,
LLC offers two distinctly different air curtain burners:
S-Series:
The S-Series machines are portable systems (transportable by low -boy trailer, "Landoll"
truck, etc.).utilizing a refractory walled enclosure. They are completely self contained
and do not require any setup or tear -down. They can be used for portable applications
-' as well as semi -permanent applications. Standard system dimensions are shown
below. Custom systems are also available to meet specific needs.
Model
Overall Size
Fire Box
Weight
LxWxH
LxWxH
S-127
37' 4" X 1 V 9" x 10' 3"
27' x 8' 4" x8' 1"
50,000 lbs.
S-127E
11.40m x 3.78m x 3.13m
8.20m x 2.50m x 2.45m
22,600kg
S-121
32' 2" x 11' 9" x10' 3"
21' x 81411 x 8' 1"
41,000 lbs.
S-121 E
9.80m x 3.78m x 3.13m
6.40m x 2.50m x 2.45m
18, 600kg
S-116
27' x 7' 5" x7' 5"
16' x 5' x 6'
26,000 lbs.
S-116E
8.23m x 2.30m x 2.30m
4.90m x 1.50m x 1.80m
11,800kg
S-111
22'x7'51vx7151'
11'x5'x6'
21,3001bs.
S-111 E
6.60m x 2.30m x 2.30m
a 35m x 1. 50m x 1. 80m
9, 700kg
Suffix "E" denotes electric version
Diesel Engine
Version:
Engine:
John Deere Industrial
Fuel Tank:
100 Gallon (378 L) Diesel Fuel,
except S-116 & S-111: 30 Gallons (136 L)
Electrical:
12 Volts DC
Drive System:
Mechanical PTO 4-Belt Drive, except S-116E & S-111 E: Direct coupling drive
Electric Motor Version:
Motor: 3-Phase, heavy-duty, with enclosed controller; Max 480V, 50Hz or 60Hz
Drive System: Mechanical PTO 4-Belt Drive, except S-116E & S-111 E: Direct coupling drive
Options: Under -fire air supply (surcharge applies)
Heat recovery (surcharge applies)
Custom Designs Available
NOTES: 1) All weights and dimensions are approximate.
2) Dimensional drawings can be provided on request
Page 2
T-Series Trench Burner:
A mobile (trailer mounted) pit burner which is used in combination with an earthen pit or
trench made to function as the fire box. The T-350 is also offered as a skid mounted
version, called the S-350. The basic operation is the same as the T-350, except that it
is not trailer mounted.
Dimensions
T-350
T-200
S-350
Length
18' 9" (5.70m)
17' 8" (5.40m)
15' 8" (4.80m)
Height:
8' 7" (2.60m)
6' (1.85m)
8' 3" (2.51m)
Width
8' 2" (2.50m)
8' (2.50m)
7' 4" (2.24m)
Manifold Length:
35' (10.70m)
20' (7.Om)
35' (10.70m)
Approx. Setback
(Unit to Pit):
36' (11.00m)
20' (7.0m)
36' (11.00m)
Weight:
7,800lbs. (3,520kg) .
6,5001bs. (3,000kg)
9,500lbs. (4,300kg)
Engine
John Deere Diesel,
John Deere Diesel,
John Deere Diesel,
6068D (6 Cylinders)
4020D (4 Cylinders)
6068D (6 Cylinders)
Fuel Tank
50 Gallon (189 L)
30 Gallon (136 L)
100 Gallon (378 L)
Electrical
12 Volts DC
12 Volts DC
12 Volts DC
Drive System
Mechanical PTO
Mechanical PTO
Mechanical PTO
4-Belt Drive
Direct Coupling Drive
4-Belt Drive
NOTES: 1) All weights and dimensions are approximate
2) If required, dimensional drawings can be provided
Page 3
W
The Principle of Air Curtain Incineration
OPERATION
The operating principle of the air curtain within an incineration device lies in the
introduction of controlled high velocity air across the upper portion of the combustion
chamber in which combustibles, such as wood, are loaded. The powerful curtain of air
created in this process is actually a rotating mass of high temperature air (2,3000 F or
1,2600 C, or more) that has been trapped in the chamber. The increased combustion time
and turbulence results in complete combustion of the loaded waste and the protective
curtain created by the rotating air significantly reduces emissions.
This effective and essentially clean incineration of wood waste is documented in
engineering studies and analyses that have been compiled over the years at operating
facilities throughout the US.
1. Air curtain machine manifold and nozzles directing high velocity air flow into
refractory lined box or earthen trench.
2. Refractory lined wall as on the S-Series machines, or earthen wall as used with the
T-Series machines.
3. Material to be burned.
4. Initial air flow forms a high velocity "curtain" over fire.
5. Continued air flow over -oxygenates fire keeping temperatures high. Higher
temperatures provide a cleaner and more complete burn.
Page 4
I
rZ,
APPLICATION
The ash from typical wood waste is a very useful soil additive, and as such offers a
commodity that can be marketed to plant nurseries, farms, etc. as a potting soil additive.
This beneficial reuse aspect of the residual ash may be important to the overall profitability
of the Air Burners System in certain applications. Recycling our resources is not only
socially and politically imperative, but it often reaps the additional benefit of tax incentives
or tax credits. Solid waste landfills are diminishing rapidly, and permits are difficult to
secure for new sites. The Air Burners System provides an affordable and environmentally
sound alternative to indiscriminate depositing of wood debris into landfills.
In the past, diseased animal carcasses were usually buried and forgotten. Little was
known about the agents that caused the deadly diseases which have wiped out many
herds of cattle and entire chicken farms. What is important to understand is that certain
pathogens have been known to survive over fifty years in the soil where they have been
buried along with animal carcasses that perished from the disease. The only known
practical approach to the elimination of diseased carcasses is high temperature
incineration. Air Burners Air Curtain Systems are ideally suited for this task and have
repeatedly been employed for that purpose with the approval of the US, Canadian and
certain foreign authorities.
Air Burners' systems are the preferred on -site disposal devices for animals affected with
such diseases as BSE, CWD, Foot & Mouth Disease (FMD), Sheep Scrapie, Anthrax,
Ebola, etc. The residual ash resulting from the incineration process which destroys all
teeth and bones as well, is a safe ash material that can usually be applied to the land, as it
has been fully sterilized by the extreme temperatures applied. It is understood that the
prions which are believed to cause BSE or CWD are fully destroyed as well by virtue of the
high fire box temperatures. The mobility of our systems permit their placement at the
location designated for animal euthanasia, or at the slaughterhouse, thereby avoiding the
over -the -road transport of diseased animals to fixed incineration facilities.
Page 5
R
Description and Specifications
S-Series
Portable Refractory Walled Air Curtain Incineration System
GENERAL
Air Burners' S-Series refractory walled air
curtain incineration systems have been
designed and engineered to provide over -
the -road transportability, offering the
operator the flexibility of bringing the
combustion pit to the waste source, rather
than hauling the waste to a fixed
processing location.
The S-Series unit is a fully self-contained
system that includes a power plant,
mechanical drive system, blower fan and
fuel tank. It comprises units of varying
sizes up to a maximum combustion pit dimension of 27' (8.20m). The smallest unit of the
standard series has a pit dimension of 11' (3.35m). Custom designs are available.
Sizes are offered in approximate increments of 3' (91 cm) in length between the above
min/max dimensions. The type number designations are based on fire box length: Model
S-111 represents the smallest unit, 11' (3.35m) in fire box length and S-127 represents
the 27' (8.20m) fire box unit, the largest in the
standard S-Series.
The patented air disbursement manifold
system is mounted on one side of the
combustion pit so that the loading of waste to
be processed can be facilitated from the
opposite side. The principle of the air curtain
concept is optimized with this design. High
velocity air is directed across and downwards
at an angle into the pit creating the air curtain
on top and a rotational turbulence within the pit
itself. The rotational turbulence provides an oxygen enriched environment within the
combustion zone which accelerates the combustion process by raising the temperatures
within the pit to 2,5000F - 2,8000F (1,3750C - 1,5500 C).
The high velocity air curtain traps unburned particulate until it is completely consumed.
The end result achieves nearly 100% combustion with minimal escaped particulate and
the virtual elimination of opacity or smoke. The vertical refractory walls not only enhance
the efficiency of the air curtain principle, but also aid in the combustion process by
Page 6
F
MI
retaining and reflecting the high temperatures
generated within the chamber. The volume
of material that can be processed per hour is a
function of density of the waste material, its
moisture content, the employed loading
techniques and the time period in which optimum
temperatures in the pit can be retained. Upon
completion_ of the combustion stage, the waste
material will be reduced in bulk by 98% leaving
only 2% in volume as residual ash. System
efficiency will be reduced once the residual ash build-up reaches approximately 3 ft (91
cm) in the bottom of the pit. Typically, several days of operation will lead to such a build-
up after which the ash will have to be removed from the system.
Ash removal is facilitated through the back
of the pit where refractory panel doors can
be opened and the ash removed. The
entire unit can now be dragged in the
forward direction away from the ash pile
and combustion can be resumed upon
closing the doors. The residual ash from
wood waste can either be retrieved and
sold to nurseries as a soil amendment, or it
can be mixed with the soil right at the
location, as the material is non-polluting
and becomes a generally desirable soil
enhancer.
The S-Series Air Curtain Systems have been engineered and are being manufactured to
help meet our ongoing challenges in the volume reduction of various waste streams, and
in the recycling of residual waste products through environmentally friendly and
economically sound methods. Air Burners Air Curtain Systems are built to last, and
incorporate state-of-the-art design and engineering concepts to achieve and guaranty
unparalleled performance.
The Diesel engine (or electric motor for the E-Versions) is mounted on a channel rack.
The entire front deck is covered with %" (6.35 mm) steel diamond plate. All welds are
continuous fillet welds for overall strength. The entire structural unit receives two coats of
primer and three coats of the symbolic Air Burners orange alkyd gloss enamel paint for
optimum protection. The unit is easily moved by attaching cables to either the 1'/2" (38
mm) plate steel grab block or both 1" (25.4 mm) plate steel pad eyes located on the front
of the skids. Pad eyes are also located on the rear of both skids. Steel pad eyes for
crane lifting are provided as well.
Page 7
AIR SUPPLY SYSTEM
Each S-Series Air Curtain System is equipped with a fan mounted so as to direct high
velocity air down a patented air disbursement manifold that redirects the air over and
down into the combustion pit. The S-121/127 fan,
operating at approximately 2,000 RPM's and 6"
w.g. (1,490 Pa) minimum static pressure,
produces in excess of 18,000 cubic feet (510 m3)
minute air flow. The S-116/111 Air Curtain
System produces 8,000 cubic feet (233 m3)
minute air flow.
The manifold is equipped with patented scuffers
that peel off the required amount of air down the
manifold so as to maintain a uniform discharge
rate along the entire length of the combustion
chamber. For the S-121/127, minimum average
nozzle discharge velocity is 9,200 feet per minute. The minimum nozzle discharge airflow
is 900 cubic feet per minute per foot of nozzle length. See Summary Specifications on
Pages 10 & 11 for details.
REFRACTORY PANELS
The panels and door frames are poured solid with a castable refractory of 4" (102 mm)
rated at 2,8000 F (1,5400C). After curing, the castable thermal ceramic panels have a
cold crushing strength of up to 5,000 PSI (352
kg/cm2). Each panel weighs approximately 1,200
lbs. (544kg) and is equipped with two steel pad
eyes for easy removal and replacement.
The two refractory panel doors, weighing
approximately ;1,700 lbs. (771 kg) each, are
supported by four, custom hinges.
POWER PLANT & DRIVE SYSTEM
The Power Plant used on the S-Series Air Curtain Systems Models S-121/S-127 is a four
cylinder 4045D John Deere Diesel engine. The engine is a direct -injected, naturally
aspirated engine with a rating of 76 HP (57 kW) at 2,400 RPM under continuous duty.
The engine is outfitted with a custom designed instrument and control panel that provides
ease of operation and readily visible monitoring. The S-111/S-116 models are equipped
with a 4020D John Deere Diesel engine producing 40 HP (30 kW). The engine is
protected by a custom manufactured shroud.
Electric S-Series versions are powered by three-phase heavy duty electric motors with
IN motor speed controllers.
Page 8
The fan is mechanically driven by a pulley and
belt system. We use a quad belt system
which is easy to maintain and very reliable.
The fan is a heavy duty industrial unit built
specifically for the Air Burners' S-Series
machines. Electric versions use direct
coupling, except for the S-127 & S-121 E which
are 4-belt driven.
For the Diesel versions, a 100 gallon (380 liter)
S-1 16 E (Electric version) fuel tank for the S-121/S-127 and a 30 gallon
(136 liter) for the S-111/S-116 is mounted on
the deck. This provides approximately a three to four day operating capability before
refueling is usually required. Fuel lines protected through conduit connect to the engine.
A lockable tool/battery box is welded to the deck next to the engine or motor.
Page 9
M2
PORTABLE SELF-CONTAINED REFRACTORY
AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEM
AIR BURNERS S-1 21, S-1 27
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
1. Power Sour I ce
Four cylinder Diesel engine, minimum 76 HP (57 kW), full
enclosure; security locks around power source
2. Drive Train
Engine mounted PTO (Power Take Off) coupled to a
heavy duty 4 belt drive system.
3. Burn Container
4" (102 mm) thick walls; refractory panels filled with
thermal ceramic material
4. Electric System
12 Volt heavy duty battery
5. Instrument Panel
Tachometer, hour meter, ampere meter, key switch, oil
pressure and water temperature, gauges with safety
shutdown feature and adjustable locking throttle
6. Fan
18,000 cfm (510 M3/Min) centrifugal fan
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 9,200 FPM
7. Air Output
(47 m/sec)
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 900 CFM per foot
(85.6.6 m/min/m)
8. Manifold
Minimum 1/4" (3.2 mm) steel, solid -weld assembly
9. Skid Deck
1/2" (12.7 mm) square tubing all solid -weld construction
10. Miscellaneous
100 gallon (378 liters) minimum fuel tank capacity
11. Fuel Consumption
Approx. 2.50 Gal/Hr (9.54 L/Hr) (Diesel version)
12. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
13. Transportation
Transported by "low -boy" or similar trailer system
Load is over -size
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 10
no
PORTABLE SELF-CONTAINED REFRACTORY
AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEM
AIR BURNERS S-116
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
Diesel Engine (John Deere 4020D), 40 HP (30 kW) or 25
1. Power Source
HP Three -Phase Electric Motor (18.75 kW), full enclosure;
security locks around power source or control panel
(Electric version)
2. Drive Train
Direct -coupled motor to fan drive
4" (102 mm) thick walls; refractory panels filled with
3. Burn Container
thermal ceramic material
12 V DC with engine mounted alternator (Diesel version)
4. Electric System
or fully enclosed starter and speed control system (Electric
version)
Tachometer, hour meter, ampere indicator, key switch, oil
5. Instrument Panel
pressure and water temperature indicators with safety
shutdown feature and adjustable locking throttle; lockable
instrument panel (Diesel version)
6. Fan
Specially designed radial paddle fan. 8,000 CFM
(233 m3 /min) with 13.5 wg (3.24 kPa)
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 7,000 FPM
7. Air Output
(36 m/sec)
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 500 CFM per foot
(47.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Steel tube 10" (25.4 cm) in diameter; Minimum'/4'
(6.4 mm) steel, solid -weld assembly
9. Skid Deck
'/2' (12.7 mm) square tubing all solid -weld construction
10. Miscellaneous
30 gallon (136 liters) minimum fuel tank capacity
(Diesel version)
11. Fuel Consumption
Approx. 0.75 Gal/Hr (3.4 L/Hr) (Diesel version)
12. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
13. Other
Shipped completely assembled; transported by drop -deck,
"Landoll" or similar trailer system
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 11
M
- Description and Specification
T-Series
Portable Air Curtain Incineration
Systems for Use with Earthen Pit or
Trench
General
Air Burner's T-Series trailer mounted air
curtain incineration systems have been
designed and engineered to provide over -
the -road transportability, offering the
operator the flexibility of reducing land
clearing or demolition waste on -site as
IR opposed to hauling the waste to a fixed
processing location.
The T-350 Series unit is a fully self-contained trailer mounted system that includes a
power plant, mechanical drive system, blower fan and fuel tank. The unit has a thirty-five
foot (10.70m) manifold to support trench burning, and a thirty foot (11 m) carrier pipe to
keep the trailer mounted components clear of damaging heat generated from burning
operations. The T-200 is designed for smaller operations, and uses a twenty foot (6.2m)
in -line manifold with a twenty foot setback.
As depicted in the accompanying pictures and
drawings the trailer mounted series of air curtain
incinerators are assembled on -site. All of the
components are either mounted to, or stored on
the trailer. Set-up and operation of the T- Series
units is quick and easy. Once a site for the burn
has been selected, a trench is constructed using a
bulldozer or similar equipment. The earthen
trench is constructed by either excavating down
into the soil or by piling up soil to achieve a trench
approximately thirty-six feet long for the T-350 or
twenty-one feet for the T-200. See drawings on
Page 17 for recommended trench dimensions).
The manifold sections and two carrier pipe sections are then unloaded from the trailer and
placed on the trench edge. The unloading can easily be handled by using a front loader
or backhoe. The unloading and set-up of the machine can be completed by two people in
less than thirty minutes. Burning operations can usually run for three days before the ash
in the trench will need to be removed or a new trench built.
Page 12
Lj
W
The principle of the air curtain concept is optimized with this design. High velocity air is
directed across and downwards at an angle into the pit creating the air curtain on top and
a rotational turbulence within the pit itself. The rotational turbulence provides an, -oxygen
enriched environment within the combustion zone which accelerates the combustion
process by raising the temperatures within the pit to 2,5000 F to 2,8000 F (1,3750 C to
1,5500 C).
The high velocity air curtain traps unburned particulate until it is completely consumed.
The end result achieves nearly
0
100 /o combustion with minimal
escaped particulate and the
virtual elimination of opacity or
smoke.
The volume of material that can
be processed per hour is a
function of density of the waste
=;F material, its moisture content, the
employed loading techniques
.'' and the time period in which
optimum temperatures in the, pit
T-200 can be retained. Upon
completion of the combustion
stage, the waste material will be reduced in bulk by 98% leaving only 2% in volume as
residual ash. System efficiency will be reduced once the residual ash build-up reaches
approximately 3 ft (91 cm) in the bottom of the pit. Typically, several days of operation_
will lead to such a build-up after which the ash will have to be removed.
The residual ash from wood waste can either be retrieved and sold to plant nurseries as a
soil amendment, or it can be mixed with the soil right at the location, as the material is
non-polluting and becomes a generally desirable soil enhancer.
Trailer Construction
The custom trailer is manufactured by Air Burners using welded C-channel beam for the
main frames including engine and fan mounting.
The fenders are constructed using 12 gauge steel with steel under supports. The
manifold support rack is constructed from welded box tubing. All of the tube ends are cap
welded for better protection from the elements and a better looking finish. A lockable
steel tool box is welded to the trailer for battery and tool storage. All welds are continuous
fillet welds for overall strength. The entire unit receives two coats of primer and three
coats of the symbolic "Air Burners Orange" alkyd gloss enamel paint for optimum
protection.
Page 13
M
M
The tandem axle trailer includes electric brakes. The lighting package includes license
plate, reflectors, side marker and tail lights.
Air Supply
The trailer mounted fan is mechanically driven by a pulley and belt system. We use a
quad belt system which is easy to maintain and very reliable. The fan is a heavy duty
industrial unit built specifically for the Air Burners T-Series machines.
The fan is mounted so as to direct high velocity air down a patented air disbursement
manifold that redirects the air over and down into the combustion pit. On the T-350, the
fan, operating at approximately 2,000 RPM's and 6" w.g. (1,490 Pa) minimum static
pressure, produces in excess of 18,000 cubic feet (510 m3 ) minute air flow.. The air is
discharged from the fan through a custom made square to round coupling which, in turn,
directs the air through the flex pipe and down the carrier pipes to the manifold, reaching
speeds in excess of 110 MPH. The manifold, fabricated from'/4" steel (carbon steel; 6.84
mm thickness), is equipped with patented scuffers that peel off the required amount of air
down the manifold so as to maintain a uniform discharge rate along the entire length of
the trench. The manifolds and carrier pipes are fitted with pad eyes for easy removal.
Power and Drive Systems
The Power Plant used on the T-Series Air Curtain Systems is a four or six cylinder John
Deere Diesel engine (depending on model). The T-350/S-350 engine is a six cylinder
direct -injected, naturally aspirated engine with a minimum rating of 113 HP (84 kW) at
2,500 RPM under continuous duty. The T-200 engine is a 40 HP (34 kW) Diesel engine.
The engine is outfitted with a custom designed instrument and control panel that provides
ease of operation and readily visible monitoring. A -Rockford PTO is mounted to the
engine, providing the drive control for the fan mechanical drive system. The engine is
protected by a custom manufactured shroud. Each shroud provides two removable
louvered engine access panels with flush mounted lockable latches and a lockable engine
instrument/control. Access doors are provided for easy coolant, oil and air filter servicing.
A 50 gallon (190 liter) fuel tank is mounted on the trailer. The S-350 Skid Version is
equipped with a 100 gallon (378 liter) fuel tank. This provides a three day operating
capability before refueling is usually required (More for the S-350 which is typically
operated in more remote locations, such as pipe line construction). The T-200 is
equipped with a 30 gallon (136 liter) fuel tank providing two to three day operating
capability.
Page 14
6
ME
AIR BURNERS, LLC
MOBILE AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEMS
Air Burners Trench Burner T-350 & S-350
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
John Deere 6068 Diesel engine. Rated at 113 HP (84 kW),
21500 RPM continuous operation. Maximum horsepower is
1. Power
125 HP (93 kW). Full enclosure with silencer and locked control
panel. Emission certified CARB; EEC; EPA
Engine mounted PTO (Power Take Off) coupled to a heavy duty
2. Drive
4 belt drive system
3. Burn Container
(Earthen Trench)
12V DC system; Engine mounted alternator, heavy duty battery,
4. Electric System
complete trailer lighting
5. Instrument Panel
Oil Pressure and Water Temperature gauges with safety
shutdown feature. Ignition switch and adjustable locking throttle
Specially designed radial paddle fan. 18,000 CFM (510 m3/min)
6. Fan
with a static pressure of 14 psi (0.98 kg/cm2)
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 9,200 FPM (47 m/sec)
7. Air Output
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 900 CFM per foot
(85.6.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Steel tube 14" (35.6 cm) in diameter, 1/4" (6.4 mm) thick for
durability. Patented nozzles are 1/8" (3.2 mm) welded steel
9. Manifold Dimensions
Setback (Blower Unit to Manifold/Pit): —36' (-11 m)
Manifold Length: 35' (10.7 m)
10. Weight (Approx.)
T-350: 7,800 lbs. (3,520 kg) S-350: 9,500 Ibs (4,300 kg)
11. Miscellaneous
50 gallon (189 liters) for T-350, 100 gallon (378 liters) for S-350
minimum fuel tank capacity; Locking fuel cap
12. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
T-350: The unit is built around a custom dual axle trailer with
electric brakes and trailer lighting. T-350 & S-350: Racks for
13. Transportation
loading the manifolds and carrier pipes during transport
provided. Also included is a built-in locking tool box for
miscellaneous items. S-350: Lifting pads provided
14. Dimensions
See Summary on Page 3
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 15
MOBILE AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEMS
Air Burners Trench Burner T-200
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
Diesel Engine (John Deere 4020D), 40 HP (30 kW) continuous
1. Power Source
operation. Enclosure with silencer and control panel. Emission
certified CARB; EEC; EPA
2. Drive Train
Direct -coupled motor to fan drive or belt drive
3. Burn Container
(Earthen Trench)
4. Electric System
12V DC system; Engine mounted alternator, heavy duty battery,
complete trailer lighting
Tachometer with Hour Meter, indicator lamps for Preheat, Oil
5. Instrument Panel
Pressure, Water Temperature and Charging System. Keyed .
ignition switch and adjustable locking throttle
6. Fan
Specially designed radial paddle fan. 12,000 CFM (340 m3/min)
with a static pressure of 12 psi (0.84 kg/cmz)
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 7,000 FPM
7. Air Output
(36 m/sec)
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 500 CFM per foot
(47.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Steel tube 10" (25.4 cm) in diameter, 1/4" (6.4 mm) thick for
durability. Patented nozzles are 1/8" (3.2 mm) welded steel
9. Manifold Dimensions
Setback (Trailer/Blower Unit to Manifold/Pit): 20' (7 m). Manifold
Length: 20' (7 m)
10. Miscellaneous
30 gallon (136 liters) minimum fuel tank capacity.
11. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
The unit is built around a custom dual axle trailer with electric
12. Transportation
brakes and trailer lighting. The trailer includes racks for loading
the manifolds during transport. Also included is a built-in locking
tool box for miscellaneous items
13. Dimensions
See Summary on Page 3
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 16
1
T-Series
Manifold Dimensions and Trench Configurations
M
T 350/S-350 Manifold Dimensions T 200 Manifold Dimensions
Set-baek
36 ft (11m)
Manifold 20, ft (6trij
Length
336 ft
(10.7m) Set -back 20, ft (6m)
T-350IS-350 Pit Dimerisians
Side Crew A
Pit
9-12 ft (3-4m)i
steep-
T 350IS-35a Pit Dimensions
Top Wew .9-
9-12 ft (3-4m)
wide
T-200 Pit Dimensions
Side View
Pit
1
7-8 ft (2.3m) wide
8-10 ft (2.6-3m) deep k__
T: 350IS-350 Pit Diraensiona'
Side View B
Pit
rA �ti
9-12 ft (34MI `--
deep
T 200 Pit Dimensions
Top Wow
Length i
36 ft
(11rn� Set -back F
Pit �
20 ft (6rn)
21 ft (6.Sirn� longs
NOTE: Sketch Dimensions approximate and
NOT TO SCALE
Page 17
Miq DESCRIPTION AND SPECIFICATIONS
MP-116 Custom Trailer Package
S-116 Air Curtain Burner, Custom Trailer & Excavator
We would like to introduce our newest product, the "MP-116 Mobile Package" for the S-116
and S-111 units. The idea behind the design is to provide an entry level unit in the thermo-ceramic
lined fire box series that is more portable than our large fire box series.
The mobile package is centered around a custom single drop -deck trailer specifically
designed to carry an S-116 and an excavator, such as the Deere 80 or 110. The trailer includes a
hydraulic power pack to drive the winch system for loading and unloading. The power pack also
includes a genset for remote power on the job site. Even though the trailer is a custom design to
support this package, it could still be used to haul other equipment, if so desired. The S-116 and
the excavator are loaded over the rear beaver tail on the trailer. The MP-116, minus the
excavator, will have a road weight of approximately 40,000 lbs. The final road weight, including
tractor and excavator, will be under the legal limit of 80,000 lbs. The height and width are also
within legal limits, so this package will not require any special road permits.
The Mobile Package MP-116 is sold as a self-contained package including; the S-Series S-
116 unit, a self-loading/unloading trailer and a Deere 80 or 110 excavator (dealer supplied). The
power pack is standard equipment, but we will be offering some optional equipment, such as
Diesel storage tanks and stump crushers. We will also offer equipment to support particular
markets. As an example, for the forest industry we will offer a trailer -mounted foam fire
suppression system. These accessories will be mounted on modular skids that will allow you to
easily reconfigure your trailer as your needs change.
The MP-116 package is all you need to get started in the mobile burn business. Check
periodically on our web site for updates and more photos.
Air Burners, LLC Product Brochure Page 18
Air Burners, LLC
/J_ /vy,
UP
4390 Cargo. Way,
Palm City, Florida .3090
PH (561) 220.7303
Fax (561) 220-7302
E-Mail. into0airburnera.com
www.airburners.com
Air Burners, LLC
Air Curtain Burner Price List 2002
Effective January 7., 2002
MODEL
TYPE
PRICE $
T-350
Mobile - Trench Burner (Diesel) Trailer or Skid
S' 350
Mounted; 35 ft (10.7 m)'Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
. 35,973
MIL -to -Ball Mitch Adapter: Additional $195.00
Mobile - Trench -Burner (Diesel) Trailer Mounted
T-200
20 ft (6.2 m) Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
25,,850
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter:.$195.00
S-111
Portable -Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel)
53,992
w/Combustion Box.11 ft (3.35 m)
S-116
Portable - Refractory Walled - Self Contained.(Diesel) '
59,830
w/Combustion Box 16 ft (4.9 m)
S-11fiE
Portable - Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
61,590
w/Combustion Box 16 ft (4.9 m.)
5-121
Portable - Refractory Walled.- Self Contained (Diesel)
94,727
w/Combustion -Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
S-121 E
Portable'- Refractory Walled- Self Contained (Electric)
99,298
w/Combustion Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
S-127
Portable -Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel)•
104,872
w/Combustion Box 27 ft (8.2 m)
S-127E
Portable =Refractory Walled -Self Contained (Electric)
109,765
w/Combustion Box 27 ft .8.2 m
Prices:
Prices are in US dollars FOB Air Burners, LCC Factory in Palm City, Florida, USA (North of West Palm
Beach). Systems are made in the USA, completely assembled (T-350/200 requires set-up).
Payment Terms:
50% Down Payment with order, balance upon completion of system and before shipment, or
irrevocable UC in US Dollars, confirmed by a major US Bank. Financing available (US and Overseas).
Delivery (unless in stock):
Depending on model and our order backlog when order is placed, stock to 4-5 weeks ARO.
Warranties:
The limited Air Burners, LCC factory warranty is one year, and the engine and fan manufacturers
provide their own warranties for their units which will be registered in client's name. Extended
Warranties for John Deere engines available at a surcharge from Deere & Company.
NOTE: Dimensions approximate. Shipping and loading/rigging, if applicable, not included.
Prices subject to change without notice. This price list supersedes all previous price lists.
Rev. 0102.0
SM
LIU
Air Burners
Portable and Mobile
Air Curtain Burners
Air Curtain Destructors/Incinerators
Refractory Walled Fire Boxes
Trench Burners
Pit Burners
Custom Trailer Packages (Fire Box, Trailer & Excavator)
Serving the Heavy Equipment Construction - Land Clearing - Waste Management-
Wood Manufacturing - Forestry - Agriculture - Disaster Recovery - Animal Disease -
Control Industries for more than 30 Years
Company Information
System Specifications
01 Visit our Web Site at:
www.airburners.com
Factory and Main Office (US)
Air Burners, LLC
4390 Cargo Way
Palm City, FL 34990, USA
Phone (561) 220 -7303
FAX (561) 220 -7302
E-mail: info@airbumers.com
© 1998-2002 Air Burners, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Subject to change without notice. Some dimensions approximate. Metric conversions rounded.
Rev. 02-02-02
o
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Company; Profile .. .................... .... Page 1
Product Overview ......................................... Page 2
The Principle of Air Curtain Burning .......................... Page 4
S-Series................................................. Page 6
T-Series..........:...................................... Page11
MP-116 Trailer Package ................................... Page18
M
COMPANY PROFILE
Air Burners, LLC is the number one manufacturer of Air Curtain Incineration Systems in
the world. We hold the patents on air curtain burners, and for over thirty years we have
been building the best and most rugged machines in the industry. Our units employ
very high temperatures that safely and efficiently reduce wood and other vegetative
waste to a residual ash.
Air Burners' systems are typically used in the construction industry to support land
clearing operations and demolition debris removal, for forest fire mitigation and at landfill
sites to help reduce the reliance on costly landfills by reducing wood waste and similar
such waste streams. They are also used for clearing the aftermath from storm or flood
damage, and to dispose of (diseased) anima_ I carcasses, including BSE, foot-and-mouth
disease or CWD affected carcasses.
All of 'the systems we manufacture are either mobile or portable. The T-Series (T-350
or T-200) trench burner is trailer mounted, and, as the skid -mounted S-350, requires an
earthen trench or pit. The T-Series units have been designed for easy mobilization and
set-up. We have designed and build the machine to withstand the rigors of typical
construction site work.
The skid -mounted S-Series machines are self-contained with a refractory lined fire box.
They are designed for field use or semi -stationary placement, except for the S-350
trench burner. The refractory lined fire box allows.for more controlled burns without the
need for an earthen pit or trench. The S-Series units are loaded over the top, except for
the S-350 trench burner. The twin doors at the rear of the machine allow for ash
removal or the unit can be dragged on its skids around the site, leaving the residual ash
behind. The fire box has no bottom.
Air Burners, LLC has two manufacturing facilities. The main factory is in Palm City,
Florida (North of West Palm Beach) and the other facility is in Malaysia. This allows us
to quickly and economically service a worldwide market. Our engineering staff uses the
latest 3D CAD software for our equipment designs. We can quickly accommodate
changes to support our customers' particular requirements.
The employees of Air Burners are dedicated to maintaining the high standard of design
and manufacturing that has made us the recognized leader in air curtain burner
equipment. We look forward to working on your next project.
Page 1
M
PRODUCT OVERVIEW
Air Burners, LLC has a track record in the air curtain incinerator business that spans
more than thirty years. Our systems have been used throughout the USA, Canada and
overseas, primarily for the disposal of wood waste (debris) from land clearing efforts,
wood product manufacturing and from natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornados
and floods, but often also for the disposal of diseased animal carcasses. Air Burners,
LLC offers two distinctly different air curtain burners:
S-Series:
The S-Series machines are portable systems (transportable by low -boy trailer, "Landoll"
truck, etc.) utilizing a refractory walled enclosure. They are completely self contained
and do not require any setup or tear -down. They can be used for portable applications
as well as semi -permanent applications. Standard system dimensions are shown
below. Custom systems are also available to meet specific needs.
Model Overall Size Fire Box Weight
LxWxH LxWxH
S-127
37' 4" x 11' 9" x 10' 3"
27' x 81411 X8' 1"
50,000 lbs.
S-127E
11.40m x 3.78m x 3.13m
8.20m x 2.50m x 2.45m
22,600kg
S-121
32' 2" x 11' 9" x10' 3"
21' x 8' 4" x 8' 1"
41,000 lbs.
S-121 E
9.80m x 3.78m x 3.13m
6.40m x 2.50m x 2.45m
18, 600kg
S-116
27' x 7' 5" x7' 5"
16' x 5' x 6'
26,000 lbs.
S-116E
8.23m x 2.30m x 2.30m
4.90m x 1.50m x 1.80m
11,800kg
S-111
22' x 71519 x7' 5"
11' x 5' x 6'
21,300 lbs.
S-111E
6.60m x 2.30m x 2.30m
3.35m x 1.50m x 1.80m
9,700kg
Suffix "E" denotes electric version
Diesel Engine Version:
Engine: John Deere Industrial
Fuel Tank: 100 Gallon (378 L) Diesel Fuel, except S-116 & S-111: 30 Gallons (136 L)
Electrical: 12 Volts DC
Drive System: Mechanical PTO 4-Belt Drive, except S-116E & S-111 E: Direct coupling drive
Electric Motor Version:
Motor: 3-Phase, heavy-duty, with enclosed controller; Max 480V, 50Hz or 60Hz
Drive System: Mechanical PTO 4-Belt Drive, except S-116E & S-111 E: Direct coupling drive
Options: Under -fire air supply (surcharge applies)
Heat recovery (surcharge applies)
Custom Designs Available
NOTES: 1) All weights and dimensions are approximate.
2) Dimensional drawings can be provided on request
Page 2
T-Series Trench Burner:
A mobile (trailer mounted) pit burner which is used in combination with an earthen pit or
trench made to function as the fire box. The T-350 is also offered as a skid mounted
version, called the S-350. The basic operation is the same as the T-350, except that it
is not trailer mounted.
Dimensions
T-350
T-200
S-350
Length
18' 9" (5.70m)
17' 8" (5.40m)
15' 8" (4.80m)
Height:
8' 7" (2.60m)
6' (1.85m)
8' 3" (2.51m)
Width
81211 (2.50m)
8' (2.50m)
7' 4" (2.24m)
Manifold Length:
35' (10.70m)
20' (7.0m)
35' (10.70m)
Approx. Setback
(Unit to Pit):
36' 11.00m
( )
'
20(7.0m )
36(11.00m)
'
Weight:
7,8001bs. (3,520kg)
6,5001bs. (3,000kg)
9,5001bs. (4,300kg)
Engine
John Deere Diesel,
John Deere: Diesel,
John Deere Diesel,
6068D (6 Cylinders)
4020D (4 Cylinders)
6068D (6 Cylinders)
Fuel Tank
50 Gallon (189 L)
30 Gallon (136 L)
100 Gallon (378 L)
Electrical
12 Volts DC
12 Volts DC
12 Volts DC
Drive System
Mechanical PTO
Mechanical PTO
Mechanical PTO
4-Belt Drive
Direct Coupling Drive
4-Belt Drive
NOTES: 1) All weights and dimensions are approximate
2) If required, dimensional drawings can be provided
Page 3
M
The Principle of Air Curtain Incineration
OPERATION
The operating principle of the air curtain_ within an incineration device lies in the
introduction of controlled high velocity air across the upper portion of the combustion
chamber in which combustibles, such as wood, are loaded. The powerful curtain of air
created in this process is actually a rotating mass of high temperature air (2,3000 F or
1,2600 C, or more) that has been trapped in the chamber. The increased combustion time
and turbulence results in complete combustion of the loaded waste and the protective
curtain created by the rotating air significantly reduces emissions.
This effective and essentially clean incineration of wood waste is documented in
engineering studies and analyses that have been compiled over the years at operating
facilities throughout the US.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Air curtain machine manifold and nozzles directing high velocity air flow into
refractory lined box or earthen trench.
Refractory lined wall as on the S-Series machines, or earthen wall as used with the
T-Series machines.
Material to be burned.
Initial air flow forms a high velocity "curtain" over fire.
Continued air flow over -oxygenates fire keeping temperatures high. Higher
temperatures provide a cleaner and more complete burn.
Page 4
M
r
APPLICATION
The ash from typical wood waste is a very useful soil additive, and as such offers a
commodity that can be marketed to plant nurseries, farms, etc. as a potting soil additive.
This beneficial reuse aspect of the residual ash may be important to the overall profitability
of the Air Burners System in certain applications. Recycling our resources is not only
socially and politically imperative, but it often reaps the additional benefit of tax incentives
or tax credits. Solid waste landfills are diminishing rapidly, and permits are difficult to
secure for new sites. The Air Burners System provides an affordable and environmentally
sound alternative to indiscriminate depositing of wood debris into landfills.
In the past, diseased animal carcasses were usually buried and forgotten. Little was
known about the agents that caused the deadly diseases which have wiped out many
herds of cattle and entire chicken farms. What is important to understand is that certain
pathogenshave been known to survive over fifty years in the soil where they have been
buried along with animal carcasses that perished from the disease. The only known
practical approach to the elimination of diseased carcasses is high temperature
incineration. Air Burners Air Curtain Systems are ideally suited for this task and have
repeatedly been employed for that purpose with the approval of the US, Canadian and
certain foreign authorities.
Air Burners' systems are the preferred on -site disposal devices for animals affected with
such diseases as BSE, CWD, Foot & Mouth Disease (FMD), Sheep Scrapie, Anthrax,
Ebola, etc. The residual ash resulting from the incineration process which destroys all
teeth and bones as well, is a safe ash material that can usually be applied to the land, as it
has been fully sterilized by the extreme temperatures applied. It is understood that the
prions which are believed to cause BSE or CWD are fully destroyed as well by virtue of the
high fire box temperatures. The mobility of our systems permit their placement at the
location designated for animal euthanasia, or at the slaughterhouse, thereby avoiding the
over -the -road transport of diseased animals to fixed incineration facilities.
Page 5
R
M
m
Description and Specifications
S-Series
Portable Refractory Walled Air Curtain Incineration System
GENERAL
Air Burners' S-Series refractory walled air
curtain incineration systems have been
designed and engineered to provide over -
the -road transportability, offering the
operator the flexibility of bringing the
combustion pit to the waste source, rather
than hauling the waste to a fixed
processing location.
The S-Series unit is a fully self-contained
system that includes a power plant,
mechanical drive system, blower fan and
fuel tank. It comprises units of varying
sizes up to a maximum combustion pit dimension of 27' (8.20m). The smallest unit of the
standard series has a pit dimension of 11' (3.35m). Custom designs are available.
Sizes are offered in approximate increments of 3' (91 cm) in length between the above
min/max dimensions. The type number designations are based on fire box length: Model
S-111 represents the smallest unit, 11' (3.35m) in fire box length and S-127 represents
the 27' (8.20m) fire box unit, the largest in the
standard S-Series.
The patented air disbursement manifold
system is mounted on one side of the
combustion pit so that the loading of waste to
be processed can be facilitated from the
opposite side. The principle of the air curtain
concept is optimized with this design. High
velocity air is directed across and downwards
at an angle into the pit creating the air curtain
on top and a rotational turbulence within the pit
itself. The rotational turbulence provides an oxygen enriched environment within the
combustion zone which accelerates the combustion process by raising the temperatures
within the pit to 2,5000 F - 2,8000 F (1,3750 C - 1,5500 C).
The high velocity air curtain traps unburned particulate until it is completely consumed.
The end result achieves nearly 100% combustion with minimal escaped particulate and
the virtual elimination of opacity or smoke. The vertical refractory walls not only enhance
we the efficiency of the air curtain principle, but also aid in the combustion process by
Page 6
91
retaining and reflecting the high temperatures
generated within the chamber. The volume
of material that can be processed per hour is a
function of density of the waste material, its
moisture content, the employed loading
techniques and the time period in which optimum
temperatures in the pit can be retained. Upon
completion of the combustion stage, the waste
material will be reduced in bulk by 98% leaving
only 2% in volume as residual ash. System
efficiency will be reduced once the residual ash build-up reaches approximately 3 ft (91
cm) in the bottom of the pit. Typically, several days of operation will lead to such a build-
up after which the ash will have to be removed from the system.
Ash removal is facilitated through the back
of the pit where refractory panel doors can
be opened and the ash removed. The
entire unit can now be dragged in the
forward direction away from the ash pile
and combustion can be resumed upon
closing the doors. The residual ash from
wood waste can either be.retrieved and
sold to nurseries as a soil amendment, or it
can be mixed with the soil right at the
location, as the material is non-polluting
and becomes a generally desirable soil
enhancer.
The S-Series Air Curtain Systems have been engineered and are being manufactured to
me help meetourongoing challenges in the volume reduction of various waste streams, and
in the recycling of residual waste products through environmentally friendly and
economically sound methods. Air Burners Air Curtain Systems are built to last, and
incorporate state-of-the-art design and engineering concepts to achieve and guaranty
unparalleled performance.
The Diesel engine (or electric motor for the E-Versions) is mounted on a channel rack.
The entire front deck is covered with W (6.35 mm) steel diamond plate. All welds are
continuous fillet welds for overall strength. The entire structural unit receives two coats of
primer and three coats of the symbolic Air Burners orange alkyd gloss enamel paint for
optimum protection. The unit is easily moved by attaching cables to either the 1'/2' (38
mm) plate steel grab block or both 1" (25.4 mm) plate steel pad eyes located on the front
of the skids. Pad eyes are also located on the rear of both skids. Steel pad eyes for
crane lifting are provided as well.
Page 7
W.
W
AIR SUPPLY SYSTEM
Each S-Series Air Curtain System is equipped with a fan mounted so as to direct high
velocity air down a patented air disbursement manifold that redirects the air over and
down into the combustion pit.. The S-121/127 fan,
ij operating at approximately 2,000 RPM's and 6"
P
w.g. (1,490 Pa) minimum static pressure,
produces in excess of 18,000 cubic feet (510 m3)
minute air flow. The S-116/111 Air Curtain
System produces 8,000 cubic feet (233 m3)
minute air flow.
The manifold is equipped with patented scuffers
that peel off the required amount of air down the
manifold so as to maintain a uniform discharge
rate along the entire length of the combustion
chamber. For the S-121 /127 minimum average
nozzle discharge velocity is 9,200 feet per minute. The minimum nozzle discharge air flow
is 900 cubic feet per minute per foot of nozzle length. See Summary Specifications on
Pages 10 & 11 for details.
REFRACTORY PANELS
The panels and doorframes are poured solid with a castable refractory of 4" (102 mm)
rated at 2,8000 F (1,540°C). After curing, the castable thermal ceramic panels have a
cold crushing strength of up to 5,000 PSI (352
kg/cm2). Each panel weighs approximately 1,200
lbs. (544kg) and is equipped with two steel pad
eyes for easy removal and replacement.
The two refractory panel doors, weighing
approximately 1,700 lbs. (771 kg) each, are
supported by four custom hinges.
POWER PLANT & DRIVE SYSTEM
The Power Plant used on the S-Series Air Curtain Systems Models S-121/S-127 is a four
cylinder 4045D John Deere Diesel engine. The engine is a direct -injected, naturally
aspirated engine with a rating of 76 HP (57 kW) at 2,400 RPM under continuous duty.
The engine is outfitted with a custom designed instrument and control panel that provides
ease of operation and readily visible monitoring. The S-111/S-116 models are equipped
with a 4020D John Deere Diesel engine producing 40 HP (30 kW). The engine is
protected by a custom manufactured shroud.
Electric S-Series versions are powered by three-phase heavy duty electric motors with
motor speed controllers.
Page 8
The fan is mechanically driven by a pulley and
belt system. We use a quad belt system
which is easy to maintain and very reliable.
The fan is a heavy duty industrial unit built
specifically for the Air Burners' S-Series
machines. Electric versions use direct
coupling, except for the S-127 & S-121 E which
are 4-belt driven.
For the Diesel versions, a 100 gallon (380 liter)
S-116 E (Electric Version) fuel tank for the S-121/S=127 and a 30 gallon
(136 liter) for the S-111/S-116 is mounted on
the deck. This provides approximately a three to four day operating capability before
refueling is usually required. Fuel lines protected through conduit connect.to the engine.
A lockable tool/battery box is welded to the deck next to the engine or motor.
Page 9
M
M
7
PORTABLE SELF-CONTAINED REFRACTORY
AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEM
AIR BURNERS S-121, S-127
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
1.. Power Source
Four cylinder Diesel engine, minimum 76 HP (57 kW), full
enclosure; security locks around power source
2. Drive Train
Engine mounted PTO (Power Take Off) coupled to a
heavy duty 4 belt drive system.
3. Burn Container
4" (102 mm) thick walls; refractory panels filled with
thermal ceramic material
4. Electric System
12 Volt heavy duty battery
5. Instrument Panel
Tachometer, hour meter, ampere meter, key switch, oil
pressure and water temperature gauges with safety
shutdown feature and adjustable locking throttle
6. Fan
18,000 cfm (510 m3/min) centrifugal fan
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 9,200 FPM
7. Air Output
(47 m/sec)
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 900 CFM per foot
(85.6.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Minimum'/4' (3.2 mm) steel, solid -weld assembly
9. Skid Deck
'/2" (12.7 mm) square tubing all solid -weld construction
10. Miscellaneous
100 gallon (378 liters) minimum fuel tank capacity
11. Fuel Consumption
Approx. 2.50 Gal/Hr (9.54 L/Hr) (Diesel version)
12. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
13. Transportation
Transported by "low -boy" or similar trailer system
Load is over -size
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 10
Y
PORTABLE SELF-CONTAINED REFRACTORY
AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEM
AIR BURNERS S-116
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
Diesel Engine (John Deere 4020D), 40 HP (30 kW) or 25
1. Power Source
HP Three -Phase Electric Motor (18.75 kW), full enclosure;
security locks around power source or control panel
(Electric version)
2. Drive Train
Direct -coupled motor to fan drive
3. Burn Container
4" (102 mm) thick walls; refractory panels filled with
thermal ceramic material
12 V DC with engine mounted alternator (Diesel version)
4. Electric System
or fully enclosed starter and speed control system (Electric
version)
Tachometer, hour meter, ampere indicator, key switch, oil
5. Instrument Panel
pressure and water temperature indicators with safety
shutdown feature and adjustable locking throttle; lockable
-
instrument panel (Diesel version)
6. Fan
Specially designed radial paddle fan. 8,000 CFM
(233 m3/min) with 13.5 wg (3.24 kPa)
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 7,000 FPM
7. Air Output
(36 m/sec)
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 500 CFM per foot
(47.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Steel tube 10" (25.4 cm) in diameter; Minimum W
(6.4 mm) steel, solid -weld assembly
9. Skid Deck
'/2' (12.7 mm) square tubing all solid -weld construction
10. Miscellaneous
30 gallon (136 liters) minimum fuel tank capacity
(Diesel version)
11. Fuel Consumption
Approx. 0.75 Gal/Hr (3.4 L/Hr) (Diesel version)
12. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
13. Other
Shipped completely assembled; transported by drop -deck,
"Landoll" or similar trailer system
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 11
- Description and Specification
M
M
T-Series
Portable Air Curtain Incineration
Systems for Use with Earthen Pit or
Trench
General
Air Burner's T-Series trailer mounted air
curtain incineration systems have been
designed and engineered to provide over -
the -road transportability, offering the
operator the flexibility of reducing land
clearing or demolition waste on -site as
opposed to hauling the waste to a fixed
processing location.
The T-350 Series unit is a fully self-contained trailer mounted system that includes a
power plant, mechanical drive system, blower fan and fuel tank. The unit has a thirty-five
foot (10.70m) manifold to support trench burning, and a thirty foot (11 m) carrier pipe to
keep the trailer mounted components clear of damaging heat generated from burning
operations. The T-200 is designed for smaller operations, and uses a twenty foot (6.2m)
in -line manifold with a twenty foot setback.
As depicted in the accompanying pictures and
drawings the trailer mounted series of air curtain
incinerators are assembled on -site. All of the
components are either mounted to, or stored on
the trailer. Set-up and operation of the T- Series
units is quick and easy. Once a site for the burn
has been selected, a trench is constructed using a
bulldozer or similar equipment. The earthen
trench is constructed by either excavating down
into the soil or by piling up soil to achieve a trench
S-St approximately thirty-six feet long for the T-350 or
twenty-one feet for the T-200. See drawings on
Page 17 for recommended trench dimensions).
The manifold sections and two carrier pipe sections are then unloaded from the trailer and
placed on the trench edge. The unloading can easily be handled by using a front loader
or backhoe. The unloading and set-up of the machine can be completed by two people in
less than thirty minutes. Burning operations can usually run for three days before the ash
in the trench will need to be removed or a new trench built.
Page 12
Ge'i£1
The principle of the air curtain concept is optimized with this design. High velocity air is
directed across and downwards at an angle into the pit creating the air curtain on top and
a rotational turbulence within the pit itself. The rotational turbulence provides an oxygen
enriched environment within the combustion zone which accelerates the combustion
process by raising the temperatures within the pit to 2,5000 F to 2,8000 F (1,3750 C to
1,5500 C).
The high velocity air curtain traps unburned particulate until it is completely consumed.
The end result achieves nearly
0
100 /o combustion with minimal
escaped particulate and the
virtual elimination of opacity or
smoke.
The volume of material that can
be processed per hour is a
function of density of the waste
material, its moisture content, the
employed loading techniques
and the time period in which
optimum temperatures in the pit
T-too can be retained. Upon
completion of the combustion
stage, the waste material will be reduced in bulk by 98% leaving only 2% in volume as
residual ash. System efficiency will be reduced once the residual ash build-up reaches
approximately 3 ft (91 -cm) in the bottom of the pit. Typically, several days of operation
+ will lead to such a build-up after which the ash will have to be removed.
The residual ash from wood waste can either be retrieved and sold to plant nurseries as a
soil amendment, or it can be mixed with the soil right at the location, as the material is
non-polluting and becomes a generally desirable soil enhancer.
Trailer Construction
The custom trailer is manufactured by Air Burners using welded C-channel beam for the
main frames including engine and fan mounting.
The fenders are constructed using 12 gauge steel with steel under supports. The
manifold support rack is constructed from welded box tubing. All of the tube ends are cap
welded for better protection from the elements and a better looking finish. A lockable
steel tool box is welded to the trailer for battery and tool storage. All welds are continuous
fillet welds for overall strength. The entire unit receives two coats of primer and three
coats of the symbolic "Air Burners Orange" alkyd gloss enamel paint for optimum
protection.
Page 13
R
7
The tandem axle trailer includes electric brakes. The lighting package includes license
plate, reflectors, side marker and tail lights.
Air Supply
The trailer mounted fan is mechanically driven by a pulley and belt system. We use a
quad belt system which is easy to maintain and very reliable. The fan is a heavy duty
industrial unit built specifically for the Air Burners T-Series machines.
The fan is mounted so as to direct high velocity air down a patented air disbursement
manifold that redirects the air over and down into the, combustion pit. On the T-350, the
fan, operating at approximately 2,000 RPM's and 6" w.g. (1,490 Pa) minimum static
pressure, produces in excess of 18,000 cubic feet (510 m3 ) minute air flow. The air is
discharged from the fan through a custom made square to round coupling which, in turn,
directs the air through the flex pipe and down the carrier pipes to the manifold, reaching
speeds In excess of 110 MPH: The manifold, fabricated from '/4" steel (carbon steel; 6.84
mm thickness), is equipped with patented scuffers that peel off the required amount of air
down the manifold so as to maintain a uniform discharge rate along the entire length of
the trench. The manifolds and carrier pipes are fitted with pad eyes for easy removal.
Power and Drive Systems
The Power Plant used on the T-Series Air Curtain Systems is a four or six cylinder John
Deere Diesel engine (depending on model). The T-350/S-350 engine is a six cylinder
direct -injected, naturally aspirated engine with a minimum rating of 113 HP (84 kW) at
2,500 RPM under continuous duty. The T-200 engine is a 40 HP (34 kW) Diesel engine.
The engine is outfitted with a custom designed instrument and control panel that provides
ease of operation and readily visible monitoring. A Rockford PTO is mounted to the
engine, providing the drive control for the fan mechanical drive system. The engine is
protected by a custom manufactured shroud. Each shroud provides two removable
louvered engine access panels with flush mounted lockable latches and a lockable engine
instrument/control. Access doors are provided for easy coolant, oil and air filter servicing.
A 50 gallon (190 liter) fuel tank is mounted on the trailer. The S-350 Skid Version is
equipped with a 100 gallon (378 liter) fuel tank. This provides a three day operating
capability before refueling is usually required (More for the S-350 which is typically
operated in more remote locations, such as pipe line construction). The T-200 is
equipped with a 30 gallon (136 liter) fuel tank providing two to three day operating
capability.
Page 14
U
6
'In
AIR BURNERS, LLC
MOBILE AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEMS
Air Burners Trench Burner T-350 & S-350
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
John Deere 6068 Diesel engine. Rated at 113 HP (84 kW),
1. Power
2,500 RPM continuous operation. Maximum horsepower is
125 HP (93 kW). Full enclosure with silencer and locked control
panel. Emission certified CARB; EEC; EPA
2. Drive
Engine mounted PTO (Power Take Off) coupled to a heavy duty
4 belt drive system
3. Burn Container
(Earthen Trench)
4. Electric System
12V DC system; Engine mounted alternator, heavy•duty battery;
complete trailer lighting
5. Instrument Panel
Oil Pressure and Water Temperature gauges with safety
shutdown feature. Ignition switch and adjustable locking throttle
6. Fan
Specially designed radial paddle fan. 18,000 CFM (510 m3 /min)
with a static pressure of 14 psi (0.98 kg/cm')
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 9,200 FPM (47 m/sec)
7. Air Output
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 900 CFM per foot
(85.6.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Steel tube 14" (35.6 cm) in diameter, 1/4" (6.4 mm) thick for
durability. Patented nozzles are 1/8" (3.2 mm) welded steel
9. Manifold Dimensions
Setback (Blower Unit to Manifold/Pit): -36' (-11 m)
Manifold Length: 35' (10.7 m)
10. Weight (Approx.)
T-350: 7,800 lbs. (3,520 kg) S-350: 9,500 Ibs (4,300 kg)
11. Miscellaneous
50 gallon (189 liters) for T-350, 100 gallon (378 liters) for S-350
minimum fuel tank capacity; Locking fuel cap
12. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
T-350: The unit is built around a custom dual axle trailer with
electric brakes and trailer lighting. T-350 & S-350: Racks for
13. Transportation
loading the manifolds and carrier pipes during transport
provided. Also included is a built-in locking tool box for
miscellaneous items. S-350: Lifting pads provided
14. Dimensions
See Summary on Page 3
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 15
MOBILE AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEMS
Air Burners Trench Burner T-200
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
Diesel Engine (John Deere 4020D), 40 HP (30 kW) continuous
1. Power Source
operation. Enclosure with silencer and control panel. Emission
certified CARB; EEC; EPA
2. Drive Train
Direct -coupled motor to fan drive or belt drive
3. Burn Container
(Earthen Trench)
4. Electric,System
12V DC system; Engine mounted alternator, heavy duty battery,
complete trailer lighting
Tachometer with Hour Meter, indicator lamps for Preheat, Oil
5. Instrument Panel
Pressure, Water Temperature and Charging .System. Keyed
ignition switch and adjustable locking throttle
6. Fan
Specially designed radial paddle fan. 12,000 CFM (340 m'/min)
with a static pressure of 12 psi (0.84 kg/cm2)
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 7,000 FPM
7.. Air Output
(36 m/sec)
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 500 CFM per foot
(47.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Steel tube 10" (25.4 cm) in diameter, 1/4" (6.4 mm) thick for
durability. Patented nozzles are 1/8" (3.2 mm) welded steel
9. Manifold Dimensions
Setback (Trailer/Blower Unit -to Manifold/Pit): 20' (7 m). Manifold
Length: 20' (7 m)
10. Miscellaneous
30 gallon (136 liters) minimum fuel tank capacity.
11. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
The unit is built around a custom dual axle trailer with electric
12. Transportation
brakes and trailer lighting. The trailer includes racks for loading
the manifolds during transport. Also included is a built-in locking
tool box for miscellaneous items
13. Dimensions
See Summary on Page 3
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 16
i
T-Series
Manifold Dimensions and Trench Configurations
r 350IS- 350 Manifold Dimensions 7- 200 Manifold Dimensions
T3501$450 Pit Dimensions
Sid& V Idw A
Pit
9-12 ft 43-4rn)� L
deep
r-35a/S-350 Pit Dimensions
Tap 14ow - -
Pit
8-12 ft (3-4m)
wide
r-200- Pit Dimensions
Side Wow
Manifold 20- et (Orny
T 3'5Q07S-3'50 Pit Dimensions
Side View B
Pit
L
9-12 ft (3-4rnj -_
deep
T 2'0a Pei Dirmensions
Top Wow
Length
36 ft -
(11rn) Setback � � � Pit � r
20 ft 46m>
21 ft 46.5m� long
Pit
7--8 ft (2.3m) wide �
8-10 ft (2.6-3m) deep -
i
NOTE: Sketch Dimensions approximate and
NOT TO SCALE
Page 17
M
MN DESCRIPTION AND SPECIFICATIONS
US
W5
MP-116 Custom Trailer Package
S-116. Air Curtain Burner, Custom Trailer & Excavator
We would like to introduce our newest product, the "MP-116 Mobile Package" for the S-116
and S-111 units. The idea behind the design is to provide an entry level unit in the thermo-ceramic
lined fire box series that is more portable than our large fire box series.
The mobile package is centered around a custom single drop -deck trailer specifically
designed to carry an S-116 and an excavator, such as the Deere 80 or 110. The trailer includes a
hydraulic power pack to drive the winch system for loading and unloading. The power pack also
includes a genset for remote power on the job site. Even though the trailer is a custom design to
support this package, it could still be used to haul other equipment, if so desired. The S-116 and
the excavator are loaded over the rear beaver tail on the trailer. The MP-116, minus the
excavator, will have a road weight of approximately 40,000 lbs. The final road weight, including
tractor and excavator, will be under the legal limit of 80,000 lbs. The height and width are also
within legal limits, so this package will not require any special road permits.
The Mobile Package MP-116 is sold as a self-contained package including; the S-Series S-
116 unit, a self-loading/unloading trailer and a Deere 80 or 110 excavator (dealer supplied). The
power pack is standard equipment, but we will be offering some optional equipment, such as
Diesel storage tanks and stump crushers. We will also offer equipment to support particular
markets. As an example, for the forest industry we will offer a trailer -mounted foam fire
suppression system. These accessories will be mounted on modular skids that will allow you to
easily reconfigure your trailer as your needs change.
The MP-116 package is all you need to get started in the mobile burn business. Check
periodically on our web site for updates and more photos.
Air Burners, LLC Product Brochure
Page 18
Air Burners, LLC
4390 Cargo. Way,
Palm City, Florida .S4990
PH (561) 220-7303
Fax (5.61) 220-7302
E-Mail: info@airbumers.com
www.airburners.com
Air Burners, LLC
Air Curtain Burner Price List 2002
Effective January 7., 2002
MOREL
TYPE
PRICE $
T-3.50
Mobile - Trench Burner (Diesel) Trailer or Skid
S-350
Mounted; 35 ft (10.7 m):Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
35,973
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter: Additional $195.00
Mobile - Trench -Burner (Diesel) Trailer Mounted
T-200
20 ft (6.2 m) Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
25,850
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter:.$195.00
S-111
Portable - Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel)
53;992
w/Combustion Box.11 ft (3.35 m)
S-116
Portable = Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel)
59,830
w/Combustion Box 16 ft (4.9 m)
S-116E
Portable - Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
61,590
w/Combustion •Box 16 ft (4.9 m)
S-121
Portable - Refractory Walled_- Self Contained (Diesel)
94,727
w/Combustion Box 21 ft (6A m)
S-121 E
Portable'- Refractory Walled-- Self Contained (Electric)
99,298
w/Combustion Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
5-127
Portable = Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel).
104,872
w/Combustion Box 27 ft (8.2 m)
S-12714
Portable•= Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
109,765
w/Combustion Box 27 ft .8.2 m
Prices:
Prices are in US dollars FOB Air Burners, LCC Factory in Palm City, Florida, USA (North of West Palm
Beach). Systems are made in the USA, completely assembled (T-350/200 requires set-up).
Payment Terns:
500/6 Down Payment with order, balance upon completion of system and before shipment, or
irrevocable UC in US Dollars, confirmed by a major US Bank. Financing available (US and Overseas).
Delivery (unless in stock):
Depending on model and our order backlog when order is placed, stock to 4-5 weeks ARO.
Warranties:
The limited Air Burners, LOG factory warranty is one year, and the engine and fan manufacturers
provide their own warranties for their units which will be registered in client's name. Extended
Warranties for John Deere engines available at a surcharge from Deere & Company.
NOTE: Dimensions approximate. Shipping and loading/rigging, if applicable, not included.
Prices subject to change without notice. This price list supercedes all previous price lists.
Rev. 0102.0
9
Air Burners
Portable and Mobile
Air Curtain Burners
Air Curtain Destructors/Incinerators
Refractory Walled Fire Boxes
Trench Burners
Pit Burners
Custom Trailer Packages (Fire Box, Trailer & Excavator)
Serving the Heavy Equipment - Construction - Land Clearing - Waste Management -
Wood Manufacturing - Forestry - Agriculture - Disaster Recovery - Animal Disease
Control Industries for more than 30 Years
Company Information
System Specifications
Visit our Web Site at:
www.airburners.com
Factory and Main Office (US)
Air Burners, LLC
4390 Cargo Way
Palm City, FL 34990, USA
Phone (561) 220 -7303
FAX (561) 220 -7302
E-mail: info@airbumers.com
© 1998-2002 Air Burners, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Subject to change without notice. Some dimensions approximate. Metric conversions rounded.
Rev. 02-02-02
i
ON
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Company Profile ......................... .. Page 1
Product Overview ......................................... Page 2
The Principle of Air Curtain Burning .......................... Page 4
S-Series................................................. Page 6
T-Series ............................................... I Page11
MP-116 Trailer Package ................................... Page18
I
M
IN
COMPANY PROFILE
Air Burners, LLC is the number one manufacturer of Air Curtain Incineration Systems in
the world. We hold the patents on air curtain burners, and for over thirty years we have
been building the best and most rugged machines in the industry. Our units employ
very high temperatures that safely and efficiently reduce wood and other vegetative
waste to a residual ash.
Air Burners' systems are typically used in the construction industry to support land
clearing operations and demolition debris removal, for forest fire mitigation and at landfill
sites to help reduce the reliance on costly landfills by reducing wood waste and similar
such waste streams'. They are also used for clearing the aftermath from storm or flood
damage, and to dispose of (diseased) animal carcasses, including BSE, foot-and-mouth
disease or CWD affected carcasses.
All of the systems we manufacture are either mobile or portable. The T-Series (T-350
or T-200) trench burner is trailer mounted, and, as the skid -mounted S-350, requires an
earthen trench or pit. The T-Series units have been designed for easy mobilization and
set-up. We have designed and build the machine to withstand the rigors of typical
construction site work.
The skid -mounted S-Series machines are self-contained with a refractory lined fire box.
They are designed for field use or semi -stationary placement, except for the S-350
trench burner. The refractory lined fire box allows for more controlled burns without the
need for an earthen pit or trench. The S-Series units are loaded over the top, except for
the S-350 trench burner. The twin doors at the rear of the machine allow for ash
removal or the unit can be dragged on its skids around the site, leaving the residual ash
behind. The fire box has no bottom.
Air Burners, LLC has two manufacturing facilities. The main factory is in Palm City,
Florida (North of West Palm Beach) and the other facility is in Malaysia. This allows us
to quickly and economically service a worldwide market. Our engineering staff uses the
latest 3D CAD software for our equipment designs. We can quickly accommodate
changes to support our customers' particular requirements.
The employees of Air Burners are dedicated to maintaining the high standard of design
and manufacturing that has made us the recognized leader in air curtain burner
equipment. We look forward to working on your next project.
Page 1
M
PRODUCT OVERVIEW
Air Burners, LLC has a track record in the air curtain incinerator business that spans
more than thirty years. Our systems have been used throughout the USA, Canada and
overseas, primarily for the disposal of wood waste (debris) from land clearing efforts,
wood product manufacturing and from natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornados
and floods, but often also for the disposal of diseased animal carcasses. Air Burners,
LLC offers two distinctly different air curtain burners:
S-Series:
The S-Series machines are portable systems (transportable by low -boy trailer, "Landoll"
truck, etc.) utilizing a refractory walled enclosure. They are completely self contained
and do not require any setup or tear -down. They can be used for portable applications
as well as semi -permanent applications. Standard system dimensions are shown
below. Custom systems are also available to meet specific needs.
Model
Overall Size
Fire Box
Weight
L x W x H
E x W x H
S-127
37' 4" x 11' 9" x 10' 3"
27' x 8' 4" x8' 1"
50,000 lbs.
S-127E
11.40m x 3.78m x 3.13m
8.20m x 2.50m x 2.45m
22,600kg
S-121
32' 2" x 11' 9" x10' 3"
21' x 8' 4" x 8' 1"
41,000 lbs.
S-121 E
9.80m x 3. 78m x 3.13m
6.40m x 2.50m x 2.45m
18, 600kg
S-116
27' x 7' 5" xT 5"
16' x 5' x 6'
26,000 lbs.
S-116E
8.23m x 2.30m x 2.30m
4.90m x 1.50m x 1.80m
11,800kg
S-111
22' x 7' 5" x7' 5"
11' x 5' x 6'
21,300 lbs.
S-111 E
6.60m x 2.30m x 2.30m
3.35m x 1.50m x 1.80m
9,700kg
RM Suffix "E" denotes electric version
Diesel Engine Version:
Engine: John Deere Industrial
Fuel Tank: 100 Gallon (378 L) Diesel Fuel, except S-116 & S-111: 30 Gallons (136 L)
Electrical: 12 Volts DC
Drive System: Mechanical PTO 4-Belt Drive, except S-116E & S-111 E: Direct coupling drive
Electric Motor Version:
Motor: 3-Phase, heavy-duty, with enclosed controller; Max 480V, 50Hz or 60Hz
Drive System: Mechanical PTO 4-Belt Drive, except S-116E & S-111 E: Direct coupling drive
Options: Under -fire air supply (surcharge applies)
Heat recovery (surcharge applies)
Custom Designs Available
NOTES: 1) All weights and dimensions are approximate.
2) Dimensional drawings can be provided on request
Page 2
T-Series Trench Burner:
A mobile (trailer mounted) pit burner which is used in combination with an earthen pit or
trench made to function as the fire box. The T-350 is also offered as a skid mounted
version, called the S-350. The basic operation is the same as the T-350, except that it
is not trailer mounted.
Dimensions
T-350
T-200
S-350
Length
18' 9" (5.70m)
17' 8" (5.40m)
15' 8" (4.80m)
Height:
81711 (2.60m)
6' (1.85m)
8' 3" (2.51m)
Width
81211 (2.50m)
8' (2.50m)
7' 4" (2.24m)
Manifold Length:
35' (10.70m)
20' (7.0m)
35' (10.70m)
Approx. Setback
(Unit to Pit):
36' (11.00m)
20' (7.0m)
36' (11.00m)
Weight:
7,800lbs. (3,520kg)
6,500lbs. (3,000kg)
9,500lbs. (4,300kg)
Engine
John Deere Diesel,
John Deere Diesel,
John Deere Diesel,
6068D (6 Cylinders)
4020D (4 Cylinders)
6068D (6 Cylinders)
Fuel Tank
50 Gallon (189 L)
30 Gallon (136 L)
100 Gallon (378 L)
Electrical
12 Volts DC
12 Volts DC
12 Volts DC
Drive System
Mechanical PTO
Mechanical PTO
Mechanical PTO
4-Belt Drive
Direct Coupling Drive
4-Belt Drive
NOTES: 1) All weights and dimensions are approximate
2) If required, dimensional drawings can be provided
Page 3
W
i
The Principle of Air Curtain Incineration
OPERATION
The operating principle of the air curtain within an incineration device lies in the
introduction of controlled high velocity air across the upper portion of the combustion
chamber in which combustibles, such as wood, are loaded. The powerful curtain of air
created in this process is actually a rotating mass of high temperature air (2,3000 F or
1,2600 C, or more) that has been trapped in the chamber. The. increased combustion time
and turbulence results in complete combustion of the loaded waste and the protective
curtain created by the rotating air significantly reduces emissions.
This effective and essentially clean incineration of wood waste is documented in
engineering studies and analyses that have been compiled over the years at operating
facilities throughout the US.
1. Air curtain machine manifold and nozzles directing high velocity air flow into
refractory lined box or earthen trench.
2. Refractory lined wall as on the S-Series machines, or earthen wall as used with the
T-Series machines.
3. Material to be burned.
4. Initial air flow forms a high velocity "curtain" over fire.
5. Continued air flow over -oxygenates fire keeping temperatures high. Higher
temperatures provide a cleaner and more complete burn.
Page 4
M
APPLICATION
The ash from typical wood waste is a very useful soil additive, and as such offers a
commodity that can be marketed to plant nurseries, farms, etc. as a potting soil additive.
This beneficial reuse aspect of the residual ash may be important to the overall profitability
of the Air Burners System in certain applications. Recycling our resources is not only
socially and politically imperative, but it often reaps the additional benefit of tax incentives
or tax credits. Solid waste landfills are diminishing rapidly, and permits are difficult to
secure for new sites. The Air Burners System provides an affordable and environmentally
sound alternative to indiscriminate depositing of wood debris into landfills.
In the past, diseased animal carcasses were usually buried and forgotten. Little was
known about the agents that caused the deadly diseases which have wiped out many
herds of cattle and entire chicken farms. What is important to understand is that certain
pathogens have been known to survive over fifty years in the soil where they have been
buried along with animal carcasses that perished from the disease. The only known
practical approach to the elimination of diseased carcasses is high temperature
incineration. Air Burners Air Curtain Systems are ideally suited for this task and have
repeatedly been employed for that purpose with the approval of the US, Canadian and
certain foreign authorities.
Air Burners' systems are the preferred on -site disposal devices for animals affected with
such diseases as BSE, CWD, Foot & Mouth Disease (FMD), Sheep Scrapie, Anthrax,
Ebola, etc. The residual ash resulting from the incineration process which destroys all
teeth and bones as well, is a safe ash material that can usually be applied to the land, as it
has been fully sterilized by the extreme temperatures applied. It is understood that the
prions which are believed to cause BSE or CWD are fully destroyed as well by virtue of the
high fire box temperatures. The mobility of our systems permit their placement at the
location designated for animal euthanasia, or at the slaughterhouse, thereby avoiding the
over -the -road transport of diseased animals to fixed incineration facilities.
Page 5
91
MW
M
Description and Specifications
S-Series
Portable Refractory Walled Air Curtain Incineration System
GENERAL
Air Burners' S-Series refractory walled air
curtain incineration systems have been
designed and engineered to provide over -
the -road transportability, offering the
operator the flexibility of bringing the
combustion pit to the waste source, rather
than hauling the waste to a fixed
processing location.
The S-Series. unit is a fully self-contained
system that includes a power plant,
mechanical drive system, blower fan and
fuel tank. It comprises units of varying
sizes up to a maximum combustion pit dimension of 27' (8.20m). The smallest unit of the
standard series has a pit dimension of 11' (3.35m). Custom designs are available.
Sizes are offered in approximate increments of 3' (91 cm) in, length between the above
min/max dimensions. The type number designations are based on fire box length: Model
S-111 represents the smallest unit, 11' (3.35m) in fire box length and S-127 represents
the 27' (8.20m) fire box unit, the largest in the
standard S-Series.
The patented air disbursement manifold
system is mounted on one side of the
combustion pit so that the loading of waste to
be processed can be facilitated from the
opposite side. The principle of the air curtain
concept is optimized with this design. High
velocity air is directed across and downwards
at an angle into the pit creating the air curtain
on top and a rotational turbulence within the pit
itself. The rotational turbulence provides an oxygen enriched environment within the
combustion zone which accelerates the combustion process by raising the temperatures
within the pit to 2,5000 F - 2,8000 F (1,3750 C - 1,5500 C).
The high velocity air curtain traps unburned particulate until it is completely consumed.
The end result achieves nearly 100% combustion with minimal escaped particulate and
the virtual elimination of opacity or smoke. The vertical refractory walls not only enhance
the efficiency of the air curtain principle, but also aid in the combustion process by
Page 6
retaining and reflecting the high temperatures
generated within the chamber. The volume
of material that can be processed per hour is a
function of density of the waste material, its
moisture content, the employed loading
techniques and the time period in which optimum
temperatures in the pit can be retained. Upon
completion of the combustion stage, the waste
material will be reduced in bulk by 98% leaving
only 2% in volume as residual ash. System
efficiency will be reduced once the residual ash build-up reaches approximately 3 ft (91
cm) in the bottom of the pit. Typically, several days of operation will lead to such a build-
up after which the ash will have to be removed from the system.
Ash removal is facilitated through the back
of the pit where refractory panel doors can
be opened and the ash removed. The
entire unit can now be dragged in the
forward direction away from the ash pile
and combustion can be resumed upon
closing the doors. The residual ash from
wood waste can either be retrieved and
sold to nurseries as a soil amendment, or it
can be mixed with the soil right at the
location, as the material is non-polluting
and becomes a generally desirable soil
enhancer.
The S-Series Air7Curtain Systems have been engineered and are. being manufactured to
help meet our ongoing challenges in the volume reduction of various waste streams, and
in the recycling of residual waste products through environmentally friendly and
0-9 economically sound methods. Air Burners Air Curtain Systems are built to last, and
incorporate state-of-the-art design and engineering concepts to achieve and guaranty
unparalleled performance.
M
The Diesel engine (or electric motor for the E-Versions) is mounted on a channel rack.
The entire front deck is covered with W (6.35 mm) steel diamond plate. All welds are
continuous fillet welds for overall strength. The entire structural unit receives two coats of
primer and three coats of the symbolic Air Burners orange alkyd gloss enamel paint for
optimum protection. The unit is easily moved by attaching cables to either the 11/2" (38
mm) plate steel grab block or both 1" (25.4 mm) plate steel pad eyes located on the front
of the skids., Pad eyes are also located on the rear of both skids. Steel pad eyes for
crane lifting are provided as well.
Page 7
M
AIR SUPPLY SYSTEM
Each S-Series Air Curtain System is equipped with a fan mounted so as to direct high
velocity air down a patented air disbursement manifold that redirects the air over and
down into the combustion pit. The S-121/127 fan,
�i
3 operating at approximately 2,000 RPM's and 6"
w.g, (1,490 Pa) minimum static pressure,
produces in excess of 18,000 cubic feet (510 m3)
minute air flow. The S-116/111 Air Curtain
System produces 8,000 cubic feet (233 m3)
minute air flow.
The manifold is equipped with patented scuffers
that peel off the required amount of air down the
manifold so as to maintain a uniform discharge
rate along the entire length of the combustion
chamber. For the S-121/127, minimum average
nozzle -discharge Velocity is 9,200 feet per minute. The minimum nozzle discharge air flow
is 900 cubic feet per minute per foot of nozzle length. See Summary Specifications on
Pages 10 & 11 for details.
REFRACTORY PANELS
The panels and door frames are poured solid with a_castable refractory of 4" (102 mm)
rated at 2,8000 F (1;5400C). After curing, the castable thermal ceramic panels have a
cold crushing strength of up to 5,000 PSI (352
kg/cm2) Each panel weighs approximately 1,200
lbs. (544kg) and is equipped with two steel pad
eyes for easy removal and replacement.
The two refractory panel doors, weighing
approximately 1,700 lbs. (771 kg) each, are
supported by four custom hinges.
POWER PLANT & DRIVE SYSTEM
The Power Plant used on the S-Series Air Curtain Systems Models S-121/S-127 is a four
cylinder 4045D John Deere Diesel engine. The engine is a direct -injected, naturally
aspirated engine with a rating of 76 HP (57 kW) at 2,400 RPM under continuous duty.
The engine is outfitted with a custom designed instrument and control panel that provides
ease of operation and readily visible monitoring. The S-111/S-116 models are equipped
with a 4020D John Deere Diesel engine producing 40 HP (30 kW). The engine is
protected by a custom manufactured shroud.
Electric S-Series versions are powered by three-phase heavy duty electric motors with
motor speed controllers.
Page 8
The fan is mechanically driven by a pulley and
d f T belt system. We use a quad belt system
which is easy to maintain and very reliable.
The fan is a heavy duty industrial unit built
specifically for the Air Burners' S-Series
machines. Electric versions use direct
coupling, except for the S-127 & S-121 E which
are 4-belt driven.
1 -I"W, I For the Diesel versions., a 100 gallon (380 liter)
S-116 E (Electric Version) fuel tank for the S-121/S-127 and a 30 gallon
(136 liter) for the S-111/S-116 is mounted on
the deck. This provides approximately a three to four day operating capability before
refueling is usually required. Fuel lines protected through conduit connect to. the engine.
A lockable tool/battery box is welded to the deck next to the engine or motor.
Page 9
0
LJ
W
M
M
PORTABLE SELF-CONTAINED REFRACTORY
AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEM
AIR BURNERS S-121, S-127
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
1. Power Source
Four cylinder Diesel engine, minimum 76 HP (57 kW), full
enclosure; security locks around power source
2. Drive Train
Engine mounted PTO (Power Take Off) coupled to a
heavy duty 4 belt drive system.
3. Burn Container
4" (102 mm) thick walls; refractory panels filled with
thermal ceramic material
4. Electric System
12 Volt heavy duty battery
5. Instrument Panel
Tachometer, hour meter, ampere meter, key switch, oil
pressure and water temperature gauges with safety
shutdown feature and adjustable locking throttle
6. Fan
18,000 cfm (510 m3/min) centrifugal fan
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 9,200 FPM
7. Air Output
(47 m/sec)
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 900 CFM per foot
(85.6.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Minimum'/4' (3.2 mm) steel, solid -weld assembly
9. Skid Deck
'/2" (12.7 mm) square tubing all solid -weld construction
10. Miscellaneous
100 gallon (378 liters) minimum fuel tank capacity
11. Fuel Consumption
Approx. 2.50 Gal/Hr (9.54 L/Hr) (Diesel version)
12. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
13. Transportation
Transported by "low -boy" or similar trailer system
Load is over -size
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 10
M
a
M
PORTABLE SELF-CONTAINED REFRACTORY
AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEM
AIR BURNERS S-116
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
Diesel Engine (John Deere 4020D), 40 HP (30 kW) or 25
1. Power Source
HP Three -Phase Electric Motor (18.75 kW), full enclosure;
security locks around power source or control panel
(Electric version)
2. Drive Train
Direct -coupled motor to fan drive
4" (102 mm) thick walls; refractory panels filled with
3. Burn Container
thermal ceramic material
12 V DC with engine mounted alternator (Diesel version)
4. Electric System
or fully enclosed starter and speed control system (Electric
version)
Tachometer, hour meter, ampere indicator, key switch, oil
5. Instrument Panel
pressure and water temperature indicators with safety
shutdown feature and adjustable locking throttle; lockable
instrument panel (Diesel version)
6. Fan
Specially designed radial paddle fan. 8,000 CFM
(233 m3 /min) with 13.5 wg (3.24 kPa)
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 7,000 FPM
7. Air Output
(36 m/sec)
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 500 CFM per foot
(47.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Steel tube 10" (25.4 cm) in diameter; Minimum'/4'
(6.4 mm) steel, solid -weld assembly
9. Skid Deck
'/2' (12.7 mm) square tubing all solid -weld construction
10. Miscellaneous
30 gallon (136 liters) minimum fuel tank capacity
(Diesel version)
11. Fuel Consumption
Approx. 0.75 Gal/Hr (3.4 L/Hr) (Diesel version)
12. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
13. Other
Shipped completely assembled; transported by drop -deck,
"Landoll" or similar trailer system
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 11
- Description and Specification
Q
T-Series
Portable Air Curtain Incineration
Systems for Use with Earthen Pit or
Trench
General
Air Burner's T-Series trailer mounted air
curtain incineration systems have been
designed and engineered to provide over -
the -road transportability, offering the
operator the flexibility of reducing land
clearing or demolition waste on -site as
opposed to hauling the waste to a fixed
processing location.
The T-350 Series unit is a fully self-contained trailer mounted system that includes a
power plant, mechanical drive system, blower fan and fuel tank. The unit has a thirty-five
foot (10.70m) manifold to support trench burning, and a thirty foot (11 m) carrier pipe to
keep the trailer mounted components clear of damaging heat generated from burning
operations. The T-200 is designed for smaller operations, and uses a twenty foot (6.2m)
in -line manifold with a twenty foot setback.
As depicted in the accompanying pictures and
drawings the trailer mounted series of air curtain
incinerators are assembled on -site. All of the
components are either mounted to, or stored on
the trailer. Set-up and operation of the T- Series
units is quick and easy. Once a site for the burn
has been selected, a trench is constructed using a
bulldozer or similar equipment. The earthen
trench is constructed by either excavating down
into the soil or by piling up soil to achieve a trench
approximately thirty-six feet long for the T-350 or
twenty-one feet for the T-200. See drawings on
Page 17 for recommended trench dimensions).
The manifold sections and two carrier pipe sections are then unloaded from the trailer and
placed on the trench edge. The unloading can easily be handled by using a front loader
or backhoe. The unloading and set-up of the machine can be completed by two people in
less than thirty minutes. Burning operations can usually run for three days before the ash
in the trench will need to be removed or a new trench built.
Page 12
The principle of the air curtain concept is optimized with this design. High velocity air is
directed across and downwards at an angle into the pit creating the air curtain on top and
a rotational turbulence within the pit itself. The rotational turbulence provides an oxygen
enriched environment within the combustion zone which accelerates the combustion
process by raising the temperatures within the pit to 2,5000 F to 2,8000 F (1,3750 C to
1,5500 C).
The high velocity air curtain traps unburned particulate until it is completely consumed.
The end result achieves nearly
100% combustion with minimal
escaped particulate and the
virtual elimination of opacity or
smoke.
The volume of material that can
be processed per hour is a.
function of density of the waste
material, its moisture content, the
employed loading techniques
and the :time period in which
optimum temperatures in the pit
T-200 can be retained. Upon
completion of the combustion
stage, the waste material will be reduced in bulk by 98% leaving only 2% in volume as
residual ash. System efficiency will be reduced once the residual ash build-up reaches
approximately 3 ft (91 cm) in the bottom of the pit. Typically, several days of operation
will lead to such a build-up after which the ash will have to be.removed.
The residual ash from wood waste can either be retrieved and sold to plant nurseries as a
soil amendment, or it can be mixed with the soil right at the location, as the material is
non-polluting and becomes a generally desirable soil enhancer.
Trailer Construction
The custom trailer is manufactured by Air Burners using welded C-channel beam for the
main frames including engine and fan mounting.
The fenders are constructed using 12 gauge steel with steel under supports. The
manifold support rack is constructed from welded box tubing. All of the tube ends are cap
welded for better protection from the elements and a better looking finish. A lockable
steel tool box is welded to the trailer for battery and tool storage. All welds are continuous
fillet welds for overall strength. The entire unit receives two coats of primer and three
coats of the symbolic "Air Burners Orange" alkyd gloss enamel paint for optimum
protection.
Page 13
M
EM
The tandem axle trailer includes electric brakes. The lighting package includes license
plate, reflectors, side marker and tail lights.
Air Supply
The trailer mounted fan is mechanically driven by a pulley and belt system. We use a
quad belt system which is easy to maintain and very reliable. The fan is a heavy duty
industrial unit built specifically for the Air Burners T-Series, machines.
The fan is mounted so as to direct high velocity air down a patented air disbursement
manifold that redirects the air over and down into the combustion pit. On the T-350, the
fan, operating at approximately 2,000 RPM's and 6" w.g. (1,490 Pa) minimum static
pressure; produces in excess of 18,000 cubic feet (510 m3 ) minute air flow. The air is
discharged from the fan through a custom made square to round coupling which, in turn,
directs the air through the flex pipe and down the carrier pipes to the manifold, reaching
speeds in excess of 110 MPH. The manifold, fabricated from'/4" steel (carbon steel; 6.84
mm thickness), is equipped with patented scuffers that peel off the required amount of air
down the manifold so as to maintain a uniform discharge rate along the entire length of
the trench. The manifolds and carrier pipes are fitted with pad eyes for easy removal.
Power and Drive Systems
The Power Plant used on the T-Series Air Curtain Systems is a four or six cylinder John
Deere Diesel engine (depending on model). The T-350/S-350 engine is a six cylinder
direct -injected, naturally aspirated engine with a minimum rating of 113 HP (84 kW) at
2,500 RPM under continuous duty. The T-200 engine is a 40 HP (34 kW) Diesel engine.
The engine is outfitted with a custom designed instrument and control panel that provides
ease of operation and readily visible monitoring. A Rockford PTO is mounted to the
engine, providing the drive control for the fan mechanical drive system. The engine is
protected by a custom manufactured shroud. Each shroud provides two removable
louvered engine access panels with flush mounted lockable latches and a lockable engine
instrument/control. Access doors are provided for easy coolant, oil and air filter servicing.
A 50 gallon (190 liter) fuel tank is mounted on the trailer. The S-350 Skid Version is
equipped with a 100 gallon (378 liter) fuel tank. This provides a three day operating
capability before refueling is usually required (More for the S-350 which is typically
operated in more remote locations, such as pipe line construction). The T-200 is
equipped with a 30 gallon (136 liter) fuel tank providing two to three day operating
capability.
Page 14
j
6
R
AIR BURNERS, LLC
MOBILE AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEMS
Air Burners Trench Burner T-350 & S-350
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
John Deere 6068 Diesel engine. Rated at 113 HP (84 kW),
2,500 RPM continuous operation. Maximum horsepower is
1. Power
125 HP (93 kW). Full enclosure with silencer and locked control
panel. Emission certified CARB; EEC; EPA
2. Drive
Engine mounted PTO (Power Take Off) coupled to a heavy duty
4 belt drive system
3. Burn Container
(Earthen Trench)
4. Electric System
12V DC system; Engine mounted alternator, heavy duty battery,
complete trailer lighting
5. Instrument Panel
Oil Pressure and Water Temperature gauges with safety
shutdown feature. Ignition switch and adjustable locking throttle
6. Fan
Specially designed radial paddle fan. 18,000 CFM (510 m'/min)
with a static pressure of 14 psi (0.98 kg/cm2)
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 9,200 FPM (47 m/sec)
7. Air Output
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 900 CFM per foot
(85.6.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Steel tube 14" (35.6 cm) in diameter, 1/4" (6.4 mm) thick for
durability. Patented nozzles are 1/8" (3.2 mm) welded steel
9. Manifold Dimensions
Setback (Blower Unit to Manifold/Pit): —36' (-11 m)
Manifold Length: 35' (10.7 m)
10. Weight (Approx.)
T-350: 7,800 lbs. (3,520 kg) S-350: 9,500 Ibs (4,300 kg)
11. Miscellaneous
50 gallon (189 liters) for T-350, 100 gallon (378 liters) for S-350
minimum fuel tank capacity; Locking fuel cap
12. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
T-350: The unit is built around a custom dual axle trailer with
electric brakes and trailer lighting. T-350 & S-350: Racks for
13. Transportation
loading the manifolds and carrier pipes during transport
provided. Also included is a built-in locking tool box for
miscellaneous items. S-350: Lifting pads provided
14. Dimensions
See Summary on Page 3
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 15
Lj
MR-
Q
7
MOBILE AIR CURTAIN INCINERATION SYSTEMS
Air Burners Trench Burner T-200
SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS
Diesel Engine (John Deere 4020D), 40 HP (30 kW) continuous
1. Power Source
operation. Enclosure with silencer and control panel. Emission
certified CARB; EEC; EPA
2. Drive Train
Direct -coupled motor to fan drive or belt drive
3. Burn Container
(Earthen Trench)
4. Electric System
12V DC system; Engine mounted alternator, heavy duty battery,
complete trailer lighting
Tachometer with Hour Meter, indicator lamps for Preheat, Oil
5. Instrument Panel ,
Pressure, Water Temperature and Charging System. Keyed
ignition switch and adjustable locking throttle
Specially designed radial paddle fan. 12,000 CFM (340 m'/min)
6. Fan
with a static pressure of 12 psi (0.84 kg/cm2)
Minimum Average Nozzle Discharge: 7,000 FPM
7. Air Output
(36 m/sec)
Minimum Nozzle Discharge Airflow: 500 CFM per foot
(47.6 m3/min/m)
8. Manifold
Steel tube 10" (25.4 cm) in diameter, 1/4" (6.4 mm) thick for
durability. Patented nozzles are 1/8" (3.2 mm) welded steel
9. Manifold Dimensions
Setback (Trailer/Blower Unit to Manifold/Pit): 20' (7 m). Manifold
Length: 20' (7 m)
10. Miscellaneous
30 gallon (136 liters) minimum fuel tank capacity.
11. Air Quality
Meets or exceeds applicable US -EPA regulations
The unit is built around a custom dual axle trailer with electric
12. Transportation
brakes and trailer lighting. The trailer includes racks for loading
the manifolds during transport. Also included is a built-in locking
tool box for miscellaneous items
13. Dimensions
See Summary on Page 3
Note: Metric conversions are rounded
Page 16
I
T-Series
Manifold Dimensions and Trench Configurations
T 35OIS-350 Manifold Dimensions T-200 Manifold Dimensions
Manifold 20, ft (6m)
Length
36 ft
(10.7m) Set -back 20, ft (6m)
Set -back
36 ft (19rn)
T-350 s-2r30 Pit Dimensions T 350/S-350 Pit Dimensions
Side View A Side View B
Pit
9-12 ft (34m). 4
deep t-
T 35015-350 Pit Dimensions
rop WOW ME—
0
6-12 ft (3-4rm)
wide
T 200 Pit Dimensions
Side View
Pit
s �
9-12 ft (34mt -_
sleep
T 200 Pit Dimensions
Top Wow
Length
36 ft '
(19mj Set -back 4 4 e
20 ft (6m) Pit
21 ft (6.5mj long
Pit
7-8 ft (2.3m) aisle
840 ft (2.6-3m) daep7�
�-
B
NOTE: Sketch Dimensions approximate and
NOT TO SCALE
Page 17
01DESCRIPTION AND SPECIFICATIONS
MP-116 Custom Trailer Package
S-116 Air Curtain Burner, Custom Trailer & Excavator
We would like to introduce our newest product, the "MP-116 Mobile Package" for the S-116
and S-111 units. The idea behind the design is to provide an entry level unit in the thermo-ceramic
lined fire box series that is more portable than our large fire box series.
The mobile package is centered around a custom single drop -deck trailer specifically
designed to carry an S-116 and an excavator, such as the Deere 80 or 110. The trailer includes a
hydraulic power pack to drive the winch system for loading and unloading. The power pack also
includes a genset for remote power on the job site. Even though the trailer is a custom design to
�- support this package, it could still be used to haul other equipment, if so desired. The S-116 and
the excavator are loaded over the rear beaver tail on the trailer. The MP-116, minus the
excavator, will have a road weight of approximately 40,000 lbs. The final road weight, including
tractor and excavator, will be under the legal limit of 80,000 lbs. The height and width are also
within legal limits, so this package will not require any special road permits.
0
The Mobile Package MP-116 is sold as a self-contained package including; the S-Series S-
116 unit, a self-loading/unloading trailer and a Deere 80 or 110 excavator (dealer supplied). The
power pack is standard equipment, but we will be offering some optional equipment, such as
Diesel storage tanks and stump crushers. We will also offer equipment to support particular
markets. As an example, for the forest industry we will offer a trailer -mounted foam fire
suppression system. These accessories will be mounted on modular skids that will allow you to
easily reconfigure your trailer as your needs change.
The MP-116 package is all you need to get started in the mobile burn business. Check
periodically on our web site for updates and more photos.
Air Burners, LLC Product Brochure Page 18
Air Burners, LLC
�
4390. Cargo. Way,
Palm City, Florida.34990 �..� J PH (561) 220-7303
Fax (Ml) 220-7302
E--Mail: infoftirbumers cam .
www.airburners.com
Air Burners, LLC
Air Curtain Burner Price List 2002
Effective January 7., 2002
MOREL
TYPE
PRICE $
T-350
Mobile - Trench Burner (Diesel) Trailer or Skid
S'350
Mounted; 35 ft (10.7 m).Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
35,973
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter: Additional $195.00
Mobile - Trench -Burner (Diesel) Trailer Mounted
T-200
20 ft (6.2 rn) Manifold; Needs Earthen Pit
25,850
MIL -to -Ball Hitch Adapter: $195.00
S-111
Portable -Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel)
53,992
w/Combustion Box.11 ft (3.35 m)
S-116
Portable = Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel) '
59,830
w/Combustion Box 16 ft (4.9 m)
S-116E
Portable - Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
61,590
w/Combustion Box 16 ft (4.9 m)
S-121
Portable - Refractory Walled.- Self Contained (Diesel)
94,727
w/Combustion -Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
S-121 E
Portable -Refractory Walled -- Self Contained (Electric)
99,298
WCombustion Box 21 ft (6.4 m)
S-127
Portable 2refractory Walled - Self Contained (Diesel),
104,872
w/Combustion Box 27 ft (8.2 m)
S-127E
Portable!= Refractory Walled - Self Contained (Electric)
109,765
w/Combustion Box 27 ft .8.2 m
Prices:
Prices are in US dollars FOB Air Burners, LCC Factory in Palm City, Florida, USA (North of West Palm
Beach). Systems are made in the USA, completely assembled (T-350/200 requires set-up).
Payment Terns:
50% Down Payment with order, balance upon completion of system and before shipment, or
irrevocable UC in US Dollars, confirmed by a major US Bank. Financing available (US and Overseas).
Delivery (unless in stock):
Depending on model and our order backlog when order is placed, stock to 4-5 weeks ARO.
Warranties:
The limited Air Burners, LOG factory warranty is one year, and the engine and fan manufacturers
provide their own warranties for their units which will be registered in client's name. Extended
Warranties for John Deere engines available at a surcharge from Deere & Company.
NOTE: Dimensions approximate. Shipping and loading/rigging, if applicable, not included.
Prices subject to change without notice. This price list supercedes all previous price lists.
Rev. 0102.0
COGy COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division
OR MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Members
FROM: David P. Kelly, Planning Manager
DATE: August 9, 2002
SUBJECT: Ordinance 02-020
Staff recommends that Agenda Item # 8 - Ordinance 02-020 to amend the Land Development Code
to provide for clarification on Enforcement Proceedings be continued until the August 29, 2002
Special Meeting at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible.
Please let us know if you have any questions.
a
4390 Cargo Way
Palm City, FL 34990
Phone: (772) 220-7303
Fax: (772) 220-7302
E-Mail: info@airbumers.com
AIR CURTAIN BURNERS
Air Burners, LLC is the pioneer and leading manufacturer of Air Curtain Incinera-
tion Systems (Air Curtain Burners or Air Curtain Destructors) serving its clients
worldwide for over 30 years. The systems are manufactured at the main Air Bum-
ers, LLC factory in Palm City, Florida.
The patented air curtain burners use the principle of the "air curtain" to develop
very high temperatures and to control smoke and other emissions. As the most
effective and environmentally friendly alternative to open burning, they safely and
efficiently reduce combustible waste material, such as wood waste from land
clearing, construction, forest slash (forest fuels), diseased trees, wood product
manufacturing or natural disasters (hurricanes, floods, storms, wildfires, etc.) to a
safe residual ash. Volume reduction is approximately 98%.
Air Burners, LLC currently manufactures in four product groups:
1. Fire Boxes (S-Series)
2. Trench Burners (T-Series)
3. Fire Box Hauler
4. Custom Equipment
Our fifth product group, Tracked Vehicles, is still under design.
The S-Series units (photos on right) are advanced portable self-contained sys-
tems with fixed refractory walled fire boxes, such as the S-327, S-217 or S-116.
They are totally self-contained and delivered completely assembled ready for im-
mediate use.
The trailer mounted mobile trench burners (photos below), such as the T-200, util-
ize earthen pits as combustion chambers. The fire box hauler (not depicted here)
is a custom trailer designed to self load/unload and transport the fire box units for
easy deployment. Custom equipment includes fire boxes with electric motors in-
stead of Diesel engines and trench burners on skids instead of wheels.
In addition to their intended application which is wood waste disposal, Air Burn-
ers, LLC air curtain burners have been used worldwide for the destruction of dis-
eased animal carcasses. The machines lend themselves to supporting most dis-
aster recovery situations, as they are easily deployed; they are efficient, easy to
operate and they help protect the environment.
Many clients of Air Burners, LLC are government agencies, such as the States of
California, Colorado, Illinois, Texas or Florida, the Los Alamos National Labora-
tory (US Energy Department), the US Air Force, US Navy, the USDA, USACE,
FEMA and the Government of the United Kingdom. Other countries that have
used Air Burners equipment include Canada, Ireland, Malaysia, Indonesia, Costa
Rica, Panama, China and the Philippines.
Rev. 07-026
Contract Holder
T-200
T-350 Trench
www.airburners.com
1=Manifold; 2=Wall; 3=Waste; 4=Air Curtain;
5=Air Flow: Oxygen Rich
S-327 in Full Operation
S-116 in Full Operation
S-217 in Full Operation
S-Series
Refractory Walled
Air Curtain Burners
S-300 Series
S-200 Series
S-100 Series
mww.,airburners.com
Exmrald Gtow, ■ LC P.O Box 12969
Fort Pierce, FL 34979
August 13, 2002
Board of County Commissioners
2300 Vv it is Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34952-5652
Reference.. File Number ai-omm
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is to inform the Board of County Commissioners that Emerald Grove, LLC has no
objections to the petition filed by Wynne Ranch 'Ibis peudon filed in St. Lucie County is for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation on an Air Curtain Incinerator in the U Zoniag
District.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (772) 464-6575.
Sincerely,
r
James L. Rogers
FAX NO. : +763 0810 Aug. 15 2002 03:42PM P1
rKurr : PELAEZ AND SONS INC bdi 8/8 0224; AuQ.;3.02 15;20; Page 212
uy. . vLJW
.S►,r T LQiJE ra UN Y
CONOITIONAL MSE RE§MNSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(G) of the SG Lurie County land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an 4pplicatlon for a Conditions) Use Permit is sighed by the owners of fifty (50) pema►t yr p•►uro of the
area within 13ve hundred (500) fast of the property affected bythe proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shalt not be approved Oxcept by the favorable vote of four fifths (415; of all of the Board of County
Commissloners.
The Appkcant To allow the operation at an Air CutUin Incinerator in the U Utintles
ttus Fo0wsrng Zoning Dlstdot. ( )
Cond/flonat LAW
Rayardag PMerty North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 5.73 mite, west of rfill►ute
LocafedAt Maid Road.
Currently ZonetJ: AG-6 (Agricultural -1 dul 5 acros)
Pfease Return To St. Lucia County, Department of Commurdty Development
Ptarv*V Daftion
23W Virginia Avenue, FL Pwme, FL 34882
Plow* chwk only one of the three following statements and return by: &SM 12.
t AM IN E V RR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITION& USE
I AM NO„ T IN FAYQR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
1 HAVF—NQ OPtN10N TO THS PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
i oertify that, as of tutu dabs shown below, I am a property owner wittiln 500 feet of to proposed
Conditioner Use.
Name kmufl- t �- ka
{P16ase Psfrlt�: ,
Address:
Date: as� " "' o Signed:
tour note that any form returned without a name and #ddrosaftAll not be consldered_ All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for vie upo request.
Comments;
(FILE NO. CU-02.008 Wynne Rench)
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent ur moro of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four -fifths (415) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant oses To allow the operation of an Air Curtain Incinerator in the U Utilities
the rFollowing Zoning District (Utilities)
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 5.75 miles west of P, Incife
Located At Maid Road.
Currently Zoned.- AG-5 (Agricultural -1 du/ 5 acres)
Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 12, 2002.
1 AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE XX
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print): Matthew L y 16 Wynne
Address: 33200 Orange Avenue, Ft. Pt6rce, FL 34945
Date: 0 8 / 13 / 0 2 Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CU-02-008 Wynne Ranch)
Date: 13
Board of County Commissioners
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34981
Re: Application of Wynne Ranch to Allow an Air Curtain Incinerator
in the U (Utilities) Zoning District
Gentlemen:
I am a resident of St. Lucie County and reside at the address below. My residence is
one of those that are in closest proximity to the proposed incinerator site.
I am confident that the operation will be carried out in a competent, professional
manner. As such, it will have no adverse effect upon myself or my residence.
Address:�/�
Date:
Board of County Commissioners
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34981
Re: Application of Wynne Ranch to Allow an Air Curtain Incinerator
in the U (Utilities) Zoning District
Gentlemen:
1 am a resident of St. Lucie County and reside at the address below. My residence is
one of those that are in closest proximity to the proposed incinerator site.
I am confident that the operation will be carried out in a competent, professional
manner. As such, it will have no adverse effect upon myself or my residence.
Address: &IC'% at'Q_ � F�C�t l f 3 Y Y—
Date: to z
Board of County Commissioners
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34981
Re: Application of Wynne Ranch to Allow an Air Curtain Incinerator
in the U (Utilities) Zoning District
Gentlemen:
I am a resident of St. Lucie County and reside at the address below. My residence is
one of those that are in closest proximity to the proposed incinerator site.
I am confident that the operation will be carried out in a competent, professional
manner. As such, it will have no adverse effect upon myself or my residence.
Address:
Date:
Board of County Commissioners
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34981
Re: Application of Wynne Ranch to Allow an Air Curtain Incinerator
in the U (Utilities) Zoning District
Gentlemen:
I am a resident of St. Lucie County and reside at the address below. My residence is
one of those that are in closest proximity to the proposed incinerator site.
I am confident that the operation will be carried out in a competent, professional
manner. As such, it will have no adverse effect upon myself or my residence.
Mailing �/
Address: r- A?x jet"l ,W
Residence: _33go
Date: LZ �Z
Board of County Commissioners
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34981
Re: Application of Wynne Ranch to Allow an Air Curtain Incinerator
in the U (Utilities) Zoning District
Gentlemen:
I am a resident of St. Lucie County and reside at the address below. My residence is
one of those that are in closest proximity to the proposed incinerator site.
I am confident that the operation will be carried out in a competent, professional
manner. As such, it will have no adverse effect upon myself or my residence.
Address: f1 r`1C ✓�
Date:
Board of County Commissioners
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34981
Re: Application of Wynne Ranch to Allow an Air Curtain Incinerator
in the U (Utilities) Zoning District
Gentlemen:
I am a resident of St. Lucie County and reside at the address below. My residence is
one of those that are in closest proximity to the proposed incinerator site.
I am confident that the operation will be carried out in a competent, professional
manner. As such, it will have no adverse effect upon myself or my residence.
Address: Qr'-Ipog.Aye�
Date:
Board of of County Commissioners
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34981
Re: Application of Wynne Ranch to Allow an Air Curtain Incinerator
in the U (Utilities) Zoning District
Gentlemen:
I am a resident of St. Lucie County and reside at the address below. My residence is
one of those that are in closest proximity to the proposed incinerator site.
I am confident that the operation will be carried out in a competent, professional
manner. As such, it will have no adverse effect upon myself or my residence.
Address: ����o CllilU�e
Date:
Board of County Commissioners
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34981
Re: Application of Wynne Ranch to Allow an Air Curtain Incinerator
in the U (Utilities) Zoning District
Gentlemen:
l am a resident of St. Lucie County and reside at the address below. My residence is
one of those that are in closest proximity to the proposed incinerator site.
I am confident that the operation will be carried out in a competent, professional
manner. As such, it will have no adverse effect upon myself or my residence.
Address: I d
Date: Aug. 13, 2002
Board of County Commissioners
St. Lucie County
2= Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34981
Re: Application of Wynne Ranch to Allow an Air Curtain incinerator
In the U (Utilities) Zoning District
Gentlemen:
I am a resident of St. Dude County and reside at the address Wow. My residences is
one of those that are in closest proximity to the proposed incinerator site.
I am confident that the operation will be carried out in a competent, professional
manner. As such, it will have no adverse of at upon myself or my residence.
Address. 29502 Orange Avenue
Ft. Pierce, Fl.
TOTAL P.01
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
August 13, 2002
Matthew Wynne
33200 Orange Ave
Ft. Pierce, FI 34945
(772) 878-0224 - fax
Re: Wynne Ranch
33200 Orange Ave
Dear Mr. Wynne:
PUBLIC WORKS
1 DEPARTMENT
'c�OR10�"
As per your request, we searched our records dating back to 1992 and have found no
complaints in reference to the burning of land clearing materials of the above referenced
property.
If you have any more questions, please feel free to contact me at (772) 462-1572.
Sincerely,
6L '0' "5 —
Dennis M Grim, CBO
Building Official
St. Lucie County
Dmg/csi
OHN D, ORUHN, Dlsfflo No. 1 - DOUG COWARD, Districr No. 2 - PAULA A. I.M. Distrlcr No. 3 - FRANNIE HUTCHIN50N, Distdcr No. 4 • CLIFF BARNES. DlsrriCt No. 5
County Adminlstrorcr - Douglos M. Ander$On
2300 Virginia Avenue - Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Public Worsts: (561) 462-1485 - FAX (561) 462-2362
Division of Engineering: (561) 462-1707 Fox 462-2362 - Division of Road G Brddge: (561) 462-2511 FAX 462-2363
Division of Solid Waste: (561) 462-1768 FAX 462-6987
Division of Building G Inspecrions: (561) 462-1553 Fox 462-1735 - TDD (561) 4624428
a �v
S'T.Bi P.'L$
PEA �j441 �QW I'
TO
i �, 5`AIW, &
St. Lucie County ;'�,;'ts�'at$�'L
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
REGULAR MEETING
August 15, 2002
Commission Chambers, 3rd Floor, Roger Poitras Annex
7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Mr. Grande, Mr. Lounds, Mr. Akins, Mr. Merritt, Mr. Hearn, Mr. Trias, Mr. McCurdy, Mr.
Matthes.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Mr. Jones (Absent - With Notice)
OTHERS PRESENT:
Mr. David Kelly, Planning Manager; Mr. Hank Flores, Planner III; Ms. Cyndi Snay, Planner M;
Ms. Heather Young, Asst. Co. Attorney; Ms. Dawn Gilmore, Administrative Secretary.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 1
CALL TO ORDERa���
Chairman Matthes called to order the meeting of the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning
Commission at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mr. Hearn stated that he has heard that there was quite a bit of discussion in the community with
regards to Rose Car Wash. He continued that he has answered some questions from the public
about this issue.
Chairman Matthes stated that his employer was involved with the project in Agenda Item # 2 and
would recuse himself from that item.
Chairman Matthes advised that Agenda Item # 4, Timothy and Debra Rose Car Wash has been
requested to be continued to the September 19, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
at 7:00 P.M or as soon thereafter as possible. He explained that if there were any public present
tonight that wished to speak they could do so when they open the public hearing on that item or
they could just return in September for full deliberations. He also stated that the petitioner made
this request at the last minute and that Staff did their best to notify everyone. Mr. Kelly stated
that we had notified the church of the continuance and asked them to try to notify everyone
possible. He also stated that both hearings on the issue are public hearings and that everyone
would be allowed to speak with regards to the petition.
Chairman Matthes gave a brief presentation on the procedures and what to expect for tonight's
meeting. For those of you who have not been here before, The Planning and Zoning Commission
is an agency that makes recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. The Staff will
present a brief summary of the project and then make their recommendation. After which time,
the Petitioner will be asked to come forward and state his/her case for the requested petition. At
any time the Commission may stop and ask questions of the Petitioner or Staff. After that
process is completed the Chairman will open the public hearing for anyone who wishes to speak
for or against the petition. The purpose behind this hearing is to get input from the general
public. If anyone has something to say, please feel free to come forward and state it. After
everyone has gotten a chance to speak the Chairman will then close the public hearing. The
Commission will deliberate and then make a decision regarding their recommendation, one way
or the other. The decision that is made is typically read from a scripted set of statements that are
given to the Commission. It may sound rehearsed but it really is not. There is one motion for
and one motion against in the package, so that the Commission can make a motion either one
way or the other so it is very clear in the records.
Once again, I want to remind you that the Planning and Zoning Commission only acts in an
advisory capacity for the Board of County Commissioners. If you are not happy with the outcome
of this hearing you will have the opportunity to speak at the public hearing in front of the Board
of County Commissioners.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 2
Mr. Kelly stated that Agenda Item # 8, Ordinance 02-020 would also be continued tonight to the
August 29, 2002 Special Meeting at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible.
No other announcements or comments.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 3
SUBJECT TO
PLANNING & Z"'NG
GgpAiSSI®N APPROVAL
NOFFICIAL-r-M
swria TO
APPROVAL �
AGENDA ITEM 1: JUNE 20,2002 MEETING MINUTES: FL'HS�
Co��%
Mr. Grande stated that page 26, the fourth paragraph, third line should read "ordinances" and not
ordinance.
Mr. Trias asked that his name be added as being present on the first page.
Chairman Matthes questioned if the word POD at the end of page 6 is correct. Mr. Kelly stated
he did believe it does read correctly but should not be capitalized and would be corrected for the
record.
Mr. Grande moved for approval as amended. Motion seconded by Mr. Lounds.
Upon a roll call vote, the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 8-0).
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 4
C�
SUBIECT TO
PLANNING & ZONING
AGENDA ITEM 2: FILE NO. RZ-02-013 — GLASSMAN HOLDINGS, INC.: COM%gI SIGN APPROVAL
Mr. Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 2 was the application of
Glassman Holdings, Inc. for a Change in Zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural — 1 du/acre)
Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for 25.99 acres of property
located on the Northwest corner of the intersection of Indrio Road and Emerson Road. He
continued that the petitioner is proposing to develop the property for commercial uses. He also
stated that the surrounding zoning was RS-2 (Residential, Single -Family - 2 du/acre) to the south
and west. He continued that there was AG-1 (Agricultural — Idu/care) Zoning to the north,
south, east, and west, IX (Industrial, Extraction) to the east and I (Institutional) Zoning to the east
and north.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set
forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff is
recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of approval.
Mr. Lindsay Walter stated that he was from West Palm Beach and was representing Glassman
Holdings Inc. He continued that this application was for a straight rezoning and that they had no
development plans at this time, but are just trying to bring the property into conformance with
the Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial.
Mr. Lounds questioned if there were any preliminary plans for future use of the property. Mr.
Walter stated that Glassman has preliminarily done some sketches that would include a possible
shopping center with an out -parcel or two. He also stated that there is nothing definite at this
point in time.
Chairman McCurdy opened the Public Hearing.
Seeing no one, Chairman McCurdy closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Merritt stated after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing,
including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St.
Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant
approval to the application of Glassman Holdings, Inc., for a Change in Zoning from the
AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning
District, because it complies with the land use element of the code.
Motion seconded by Mr. Lounds.
Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 7-0) and forwarded to
the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 5
SUBJECT TO
AGENDA ITEM 3: FILE NO. RZ-02-014 - CHURCH OF THE REDEEMENVWN APPROVAL
LUCIE COUNTY:
Mr. Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 3 was the application of
Church of the Redeemer of St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the RS-3
(Residential, Single -Family — 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District
for 8.47 acres of property located on the Southeast corner of the intersection of Edwards Road
and Selvitz Road. He stated that the purpose of the rezoning is for the possible expansion of
church facilities.
Mr. Flores continued that the proposed zoning district designation — I (Institutional) — is
consistent with the zoning district designation for the church's existing property located directly
to the east of the subject property. He also stated that approval of this petition would create an
18.80-acre parcel under common ownership at the intersection of Edwards and Selvitz Roads.
He advised that a review of the Institutional Zoning District and its permitted and conditional
uses shows the scope of the impact that an Institutional parcel of this size could have on the area.
He continued that the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District was created specifically for the
designation of church facilities and the types of uses that would generally be located within a
church establishment. He stated that Staff believes that the RF Zoning District designation is
more appropriate at this location for the additional property.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it generally conforms to the standards of
review as set forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive
Plan. Staffs recommended they forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners
with a recommendation of denial for the Institutional Zoning District and instead recommend
they forward a recommendation of approval to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District.
Mr. Grande questioned why the application was filed requesting I (Institutional) Zoning instead
of RF (Religious Facilities). Mr. Flores stated that was how the applicant has filed the
application and was compatible with the existing I (Institutional) Zoning. He continued that once
the full application was reviewed Staff concluded that RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning would be
a more appropriate zoning. Chairman Matthes asked if this was discussed with the applicant.
Mr. Flores stated that he discussed it with Mr. David Sowerby, who is working with the petition
and stated that he believed that they were in agreement. He continued that churches are allowed
under both zoning districts and that the conditional uses allowed under RF (Religious Facilities)
are also allowed under I (Institutional) Zoning. Chairman Matthes questioned if this would have
to go through the site plan review process if approved. Mr. Flores stated that if a proposed site
plan is submitted that meets the 6,000 square foot or greater threshold that would be correct.
Mr. Merritt stated that there are some ancient historical issues on this property and questioned if
they were being protected. Mr. Flores stated that in this point in time they are not reviewing the
development of the property only a change in zoning and therefore would not be impacted right
now. Mr. Hearn stated that he too is concerned about the historical issues of the property and
wants to make sure it is not destroyed.
Mr. Clyde Heffelfinger stated that he resides 1008 Echo Street in Fort Pierce and he is on the
Board of Directors of the Church of the Redeemer. Chairman Matthes questioned if he
understood Staff's recommendation with respect to an RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning instead
of the I (Institutional) Zoning. Mr. Heffelfinger stated that he discussed the issue with Mr. David
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 6
sums T TO
PLANNU & ZONING
APP
Sowerby yesterday and explained everything to him and he didn't see any reason wh e c ange
wouldn't be okay. Mr. Heffelfinger stated that with regards to Mr. Merritt's comments, he
wasn't aware of anything historical on that lot and would like to know what it is that he is
speaking of. Mr. Merritt stated that there is an ancient Indian burial ground on that location. Mr.
Heffelfinger questioned if they knew where on the property this burial ground was located. Mr.
Merritt stated that he believed it was to the rear of the property and was a significant Indian
burial site. Chairman Matthes stated the Commission, as a whole would probably suggest that he
seek professional guidance in review of that information.
Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing.
Seeing no one, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Grande stated after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing,
including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St.
Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners deny
the application of Church of the Redeemer of St. Lucie County, for a Change in Zoning
from the RS-3 (Residential, Single -Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the I
(Institutional) Zoning District, because the more appropriate zoning for the property
would be the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning.
Motion seconded by Mr. Hearn, with discussion.
Mr. Hearn questioned if Mr. Grande would include something in his motion with regards to the
Indian burial ground. Mr. Grande stated that he felt it would more relevant to the approval
motion rather than the denial. Chairman Matthes stated that he did not believe that they could
condition a zoning application. Ms. Young confirmed that was correct. Chairman Matthes
stated that he is sure it has been duly noted in the minutes and their concerns will be expressed to
the Board, but they could not condition a zoning application. Mr. Merritt stated that if the
applicant was satisfied with the I (Institutional) Zoning and wasn't requesting the RF (Religious
Facilities) Zoning he didn't think it was appropriate for them to change his request. Chairman
Matthes explained that Staff recommended RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning instead of I
(Institutional) and the applicant did agree with the new zoning recommendation.
Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 8-0) and forwarded to
the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of denial.
Mr. Grande stated that he didn't believe that Mr. Hearn's comments regarding the burial ground
were meant to be a condition of the rezoning, but just to be sure that it was a comment with the
motion to point it out to the County Commission as they read the motion. Mr. Akins stated that
he too was concerned with how they would be able to signal their intentions to the Board.
Chairman Matthes stated that the minutes of the meetings are read by each of the County
Commissioners and it was made abundantly clear in the record that they had concerns about
preserving the Indian burial ground. He also stated that he wasn't sure that adding it to the
motion would be appropriate because it may come across as a condition and they cannot do that.
Ms. Young stated that Chairman Matthes' comments were correct and that they could ask that
Staff include those concerns in their memo to the Board. She also stated that the only other
option would be to include that as one of the reasons for approving the RF (Religious Facilities)
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 7
SUBECT TO
FIA'M ING & Z:ON'NG
designation and they cannot condition a zoning application. Chairman Matthes st f a SAWN APPROVAL.
was concerned about doing something that might risk the future of the petition. Mr. Merritt
stated that he did not raise the issue to put the petition in jeopardy and just wanted to be sure that
the petitioner and Staff were aware of the potential problems in the future. Chairman Matthes
asked Mr. Hearn if adding it to the Staff report to the Board would be sufficient and ease any
concerns. Mr. Hearn stated that would be fine.
Mr. Grande stated after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing,
including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St.
Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant
approval to the application of Church of the Redeemer of St. Lucie County, for a Change
in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single -Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the RF
(Religious Facilities) Zoning District, because it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and would be good for the community and it causes no potential dangers.
Motion seconded by Mr. Hearn.
Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 8-0) and forwarded to
the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 8
SIECT TO
PLANNING & ZONING
AGENDA ITEM 4: FILE NO. CU-02-001— TIMOTHY & DEBRA ROSE CAR WAMPAISSION APPNI VAL
Chairman Matthes stated that Agenda Item # 4 was the application of Timothy and Debra Rose
Car Wash and that the petitioner has requested a continuation until the September 19, 2002
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting at 7:00 P.M or as soon thereafter as possible.
Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing.
Seeing no one, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. McCurdy made a motion to continue until the September 19th, 2002 Planning and
Zoning Commission Meeting at 7:00 P.M or as soon thereafter as possible.
Motion seconded by Mr. Grande.
Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 8-0) to be continued to
the September 19th, 2002 Planning and Zoning Meeting at 7:00 P.M or as soon thereafter as
possible.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 9
1ML
SUDIE a TO
i & 70NING
AGENDA ITEM 5: FILE NO. CU-02-007 — FLORIDA CENTER FOR RECO i s APPROVAL
Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 5 was the Application of
Florida Center for Recovery, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Social Services and
Health Services (specifically an inpatient drug and alcohol abuse rehabilitation center) in the I
(Institutional) Zoning District for 12.17 acres of property located at 3451 West Midway Road.
Mr. Flores stated that Florida Center for Recovery, Inc., has applied for the requested conditional
use in order to provide an establishment for the inpatient alcohol and substance abuse treatment
facility similar to the operation at New Horizons of the Treasure Coast. He also stated that the
operation is proposed to be a 24-hours a day with a maximum of 35 staff and 40 patients in the
short term. He continued that in the long term, the applicant has stated that a maximum of 72
patients were expected to be treated. He explained that Social Services and Health Services are
allowed as conditional uses in this zoning district subject to the approval of the Board of County
Commissioners. He stated that the proposed treatment center is to be housed in the now vacant
Twins Oaks Alzheimer's facility.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set
forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff is
recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of approval, subject to the following condition:
The number of patients shall be limited to a maximum of 72.
Mr. Lounds reconfirmed that the original condition was to be a maximum of 40 but as per the
applicants request the condition was amended to 72. Mr. Flores confirmed that was correct. Mr.
Grande stated that he felt the staff memo should read that the general existing use surrounding
the property is residential and some institutional instead of the way it was originally printed. Mr.
Lounds questioned where CASTLE was located on the maps. Mr. Flores stated that it was to the
west of the property.
Chairman Matthes asked if the petitioner was present. Mr. Jack Fitzharris, the petitioner, stated
that he resides in Vero Beach and also maintains a residence in New York. He continued that
this facility would be an upscale substance abuse treatment facility and would not be like New
Horizons. He stated that New Horizons deals mostly with mental illness and their facility would
not include mental health. He also stated that they would cater to the upscale population and
would be similar to that of the Betty Ford Clinic and Hazelton treatment centers.
Mr. Lounds questioned if the patients would be court appointed and if not, where would they
come from. Mr. Fitzharris stated that their patients would be voluntary, self -paid patients and
that they would not accept any court appointed or Medicaid patients. He continued that their fee
is approximately $15,000 a month. Mr. Lounds confirmed that their facility would consist
primarily of voluntary patients only. Mr. Fitzharris stated that their facility markets for only
voluntary patients. Mr. Lounds stated that they have some feedback from concerned citizens
regarding staffing at night and their safety. Mr. Fitzharris stated that the amount of staff at night
would depend on the number of patients being treated. He also stated that this facility would
generally be run the same as their other facility in Long Island. Mr. Lounds questioned how the
facility would be staffed if running at the full capacity of 72 patients. Mr. Fitzharris stated that
there would be therapeutic aides at night as well as a nursing staff who will monitor where the
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 10
U OHU
SUBECT TO
PLANNING & ZONING
patients are during the evening. Mr. Lounds stated that the community also has comw� 4,1 N APP UAL
their idea of what is involved with rehabilitative services. Mr. Fitzharris stated that since the
individuals are all voluntary, they are more motivated for treatment and less likely to try to leave
than those who are court appointed and need to be locked down. Mr. Lounds questioned if it
would be a locked down facility with gates and guards. Mr. Fitzharris stated that it would not be
like that and that anyone who is asked to leave the facility for any reason would be transported
back to wherever they came from and not just dropped outside of the front door of the facility.
He continued that in his experience these people don't generally leave against medical advice.
Mr. Merritt questioned why Mr. Fitzharris chose Fort Pierce to locate his facility when he lives
in Vero Beach. Mr. Fitzharris stated that the property and buildings they needed were already
available in St. Lucie County. He also stated that he only handles marketing of the facility and
the location for treatment didn't really matter to him and if there were facilities and property
already available somewhere else, it would have been located there. Mr. Merritt stated that he is
concerned about St. Lucie County becoming a dumping ground for Martin and Indian River
County and feels that they have done their share already. Mr. Fitzharris stated he didn't really
understand what he meant by a "dumping ground". Mr. Merritt explained that there is a
treatment center on Midway Road, which is funded by the state and takes in patients from the
other counties and their Section 8 housing is large enough to handle those counties as well. Mr.
Fitzharris stated that Martin, Vero and Okeechobee only have 139 substance abuse beds to
accommodate 4 counties and that was one of the reasons they chose this area. He continued that
they didn't pinpoint Fort Pierce but that they just found the buildings and land already here and
available. He also stated that he didn't feel they were dumping on the County and that their
facility would bring employment and taxes into the County. Chairman Matthes questioned if this
is an existing facility. Mr. Fitzharris confirmed that was correct. Mr. Fitzharris stated that he
believed the previous owners only operated for about six months and that the buildings are
relatively new.
Mr. Akins questioned which four counties Mr. Fitzharris was talking about when he referenced
the 139 beds. Mr. Fitzharris stated those were Martin, St. Lucie, Okeechobee and Indian River
County. Mr. Akins questioned his statement that they would not accept any Medicaid, court
appointed or court ordered patients. Mr. Fitzharris stated that was correct. Mr. Akins asked Mr.
Fitzharris if he was aware that St. Lucie County's crime rate was about 90% tied to substance
abuse and of those 90% about 98% of those are indigent. Mr. Fitzharris stated he was not aware
of those figures. Mr. Akins confirmed that his facility would not benefit the existing substance
abuse problems in St. Lucie County and Mr. Fitzharris confirmed that it would not. Mr.
Fitzharris stated that he believed New Horizons was opening a facility in Vero Beach that will
accept the St. Lucie County indigent. Mr. Akins stated that he was concerned about having a
small amount of space in the existing facilities for the indigent and that there should be more
space available to benefit the problems in St. Lucie County. Mr. Fitzharris stated that he
presumed that at least 50% of their business would come from Florida, but not necessarily from
St. Lucie County.
Mr. Lounds stated that he appreciated Mr. Merritt and Mr. Akins comments but that he believes
that this type of facility will be high end and isn't sure that would be bad for the County.
Chairman Matthes stated that he agreed since a state run facility would not pay taxes and this
type of facility would help the tax base. He continued that there is an existing facility sitting
there that isn't being used and isn't generating any tax base to the County. Mr. Lounds
questioned if the staff s salary level would be higher than the states. Mr. Fitzharris stated that
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 11
is '�AUESM
SUMEC T TO
UMMMING & ZONING
was correct. He also stated that he had an affidavit from the Long Island Center APPROVAL
stating who their clients are and what type of facility they run.
Mr. McCurdy questioned if the applicant would consider adding a restriction that they would not
accept court appointed or Medicaid patients if he were granted approval. Mr. Fitzharris stated
that he would not have any objection with that type of restriction at all.
Mr. Hearn stated that the issues addressed by Mr. Lounds and Mr. McCurdy were valid but that
he is worried about condemning nearby property owners who are concerned about what is going
into their neighborhood. He also stated that he felt it was very important for people to have
protection in their neighborhoods to ensure their quality of life. He continued that he felt if the
petitioner was willing to accept the conditions suggested by Mr. McCurdy then we would be
more comfortable voting for the project. He stated that he did want to make sure that these
restrictions be part of the motion so that it is legally correct and binding.
Mr. Rodney Schuckhardt stated that he lives at 4588 Shoewater Lane in Naples Florida. He
advised that he is the president of a subsidiary of TM Bank of the Keys, which originally
financed the property for the Alzheimer's facility and now owns the property. He stated that
they are selling the property and hope to be the future lender to the Florida Center for Recovery.
He continued that when they reviewed the applicants contract and proposal they were introduced
to the quality and fiscal soundness of their other existing programs. He also stated that the
program they planned to operate in St. Lucie County was an upscale program designed for
primarily self -pay patients and found the plan to be sound. He stated that they are also bringing
substantial financial resources to the area to get the program off the ground and they are very
comfortable with their plans. He continued that with regards to security, this facility of
residential and administration buildings are equipped with a security system that locks the doors
when it is set and also limits the movement of patients between rooms and various areas of
residences.
Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing.
Ms. Rhona Perry stated that she resides to the east of the facility at 5080 West Virginia Drive.
She advised that there are not just a few houses in her area; there are fifteen homes there. She
stated that when she first received notification she was very reluctant but after doing some
research and speaking with the applicant she felt better. She continued that she still has some
concerns about the project and likes the idea of adding the conditions to the request. She also
stated that there are many children in that area who like to play in the woods and when the
Alzheimer's facility was there the patients got out. She advised that they ended up in front of her
home and didn't know who they were and she had no idea how they had gotten out. She stated
that she is aware that this facility is going to be upscale and they would be more likely to leave
out the front door than to sneak out but there could be one bad apple. She continued that they
would like to know that there was going to be some very good security at the facility because
some of the area is not completely fenced in. She also stated that they were also concerned about
the facility turning into a court appointed type facility if they are not able to make it financially
as an upscale self -pay facility. She stated that she was unsure about what exactly falls under the
classification of Social Services in the regulations for conditional uses.
Mr. Flores stated that under Social Services as in the Land Development Code, there is a number
behind (3) behind it that references the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Manual. He
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 12
TO
continued that under Social Services in the SIC Manual they allow Individual and Family Social
Services, which include Counseling Centers, Family Counseling Services, Temporary Relief
Services and a variety more on the lists. He continued that one of the ones listed is for
Alcoholism Counseling and also for residential care and also for social services that are not
elsewhere classified. He stated that under Health Services it lists Offices and Clinics of Doctors
of Medicine and Hospitals.
Ms. Perry stated that they are concerned because Welfare does fall under that as well and want to
be sure that there is a condition that they cannot accept those types of patients to protect them.
Chairman Matthes stated that he would believe that to be correct if they can condition the
conditional use permit that way. Ms. Perry stated that she would be comfortable with the facility
if all of the conditions are listed as part of the approval and legally applied. Chairman Matthes
questioned Ms. Young if those types of conditions could be applied to the applicant's request.
Ms. Young stated that she didn't see any reason that they couldn't make the fencing and security
issues as part of the conditions. She continued that with regard to the nature of the client base
she would not be uncomfortable adding that as part of the motion since the applicant has
consented to it.
Ms. Kelly Carter stated that she owns lots 112 and 119 behind the facility and is concerned about
lot 107. She continued that there are 79 acres between all of those lots and lot 107 is woods,
which used to be entirely landlocked until she put a culvert in. She stated that she is concerned
about what the applicant is planning on doing with lot 107 because it is directly in front of her
front yard. She also stated that the County has contacted her about preserving the areas that she
owns as well as lot 107 because they were just granted the funds to purchase those 79 acres. She
continued that if the County were able to purchase all of that property they would like to turn it
into a preserve with nature walks. She stated that they have even asked her not to clear her lots
because they are very interested in preserving the area within the next three or four months
because it is the largest piece of Florida Pines left in St. Lucie County. She also stated that if a
patient decides to leave the facility they would be hidden within 79 acres of woods and her home
is the first house they would come to. She continued that she has children and her property is
zoned for agricultural use and they have horses, dogs, donkey, and deer and they intend to build
an area for team roping. She stated that she has no problem keeping her 16 acres and living in
the middle of a 79-acre preserve.
Mr. Fitzharris stated that they have no plans to do anything with that property at the moment
except to maybe put in a serenity walk for the patients. He also stated that he did receive a call
from the County today about the property and stated that nothing is going to happen until next
year and he will discuss those options with them at that time. Chairman Matthes questioned if
the existing facility had the capacity to house their maximum of 72 patients. Mr. Fitzharris
confirmed that was correct. Ms. Carter stated that she was concerned about their patients being
able to walk free and what will happen to the property if the County does buy the 55 acres in the
next 4 months or so.
Mr. Lounds questioned if there was any crossing on the canal separating the division of lot 107
and if the patients would be able to go from the north side to the south side without getting wet.
Mr. Flores stated he did not believe so. Mr. Lounds asked if they would have to go out onto
Christensen Road to get to that property. Ms. Carter stated that there is a brick wall on
Christensen Road and there is a crossing that is part of lot 107 and is located on the County right-
of-way and the County would not let her put a gate with a lock there.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 13
F0CJ�
SUUNUT TO
FLUNING & ZONING
C011qqSSION APPROVAL
Mr. John Ferrick stated that he visited the location yesterday and was concerned about not having
any fences, especially when the Alzheimer's facility was there. He also stated that most of the
people he talked to about this project stated their biggest concern is with people wandering off
onto their properties. He continued that the facility should also be concerned about people
wandering into their facility especially when these are well -financed patients with a substance
abuse problem because there are people in the Fort Pierce area who would want to sell them
some.
Seeing no one else, Chairman Matthes closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Lounds stated that he did not have a problem with this project because he felt it would bring
better money and facilities than were there in the past instead of having a vacant building still
sitting there. He also stated that he is pleased that it is proposed to be a high -end facility but
does feel that there should be conditions regarding fencing and the types of patients they will
accept. Ms. Young stated that she believed that applicant has stated that their facility would be
self -pay or insurance paid patients only and not Medicaid or court appointed.
Mr. Akins stated that he did not feel that the applicant could state definitely that they would not
accept court appointed patients because there are high -end individuals (Governor Bush's
daughter) who are court appointed and could afford to self -pay the applicants fees. He continued
that he didn't believe that the petitioner's representative was in a position to agree to that
because there are high -end individuals who could be court ordered but still in a financial position
to pay. He also stated that he felt if the Commission wanted to add a condition on this they could
do so for the Medicaid and any State funded individuals only but that he didn't believe that the
petitioner would be able to guarantee not taking court ordered high -end individuals. He
continued that presuming that someone who is court ordered needs to be in a facility that is
highly guarded isn't the case for a lot of facilities.
Mr. Lounds stated that he does agree with what Mr. Akins is saying and would not want to
restrict the owners to that level. He continued that he believes they all understand that they
really want to be sure this facility isn't geared towards the indigent and Medicaid patients.
Mr. Grande stated that he feels that there isn't enough information in the application and the
petitioner's presentation for him to make a decision one way or the other right now. He
continued that the assumption that because there is an existing failed Alzheimer's facility there
that we need to do something of this nature doesn't sit with him. He also stated that this property
is valuable and could be used for any number of things and he doesn't feel that this type of
facility really needs to be in the County. He advised that he feels what was presented to them
was incomplete and doesn't feel they should be responsible for coming up with a list of detailed
conditions to protect the surrounding residents. He stated that he would not be able to vote for
this conditional use permit no matter what conditions are added to it.
Mr. Merritt stated that no matter how you say it, it is still a substance abuse center. He also
stated that the woman who owned property next to New Horizons ended up selling her property
to them because of the harassment from the patients in their facility. He continued that Midway
Road is going to be the gateway to St. Lucie County and he cannot vote in favor of putting this
type of facility on Midway Road. He also stated that he didn't believe this facility would be
beneficial to those living in St. Lucie County because they couldn't afford it and therefore could
not support this project.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 14
SUMECT TO
PL NINIIN' A A 70 ING
COMMISSION APPROVAL
Mr. Hearn stated that he understood the concerns of Mr. Grande and Mr. Merritt and would like
to see some additional time spent by Staff and the petitioner to come up with some more detailed
conditions and bringing it back before them at that time. He continued that he felt they needed
the additional information and condition to make a truly informed position on the issue. He also
stated that upscale facilities in St. Lucie County generally are good for the County and would not
want to condemn the facility if it would fit in with the neighborhood. He advised that he
personally felt the property needed to be securely fenced and landscaped so that the surrounding
property owners are protected. He also stated that if they decide to recommend approval he
would like to see this conditional use not be able to be transferred to another owner at a later date
without having to come back before the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mr. Lounds stated that he appreciated everyone's feelings about this application but he felt the
petitioner's presentation was pretty good especially compared to some other applications that
they have approved in the past without any types of drawings or ideas. He continued that the
applicant does have the money behind them and that if you have 72 beds at $15,000 each it
would mean about $1,000,080 in that facility that would be turned over many times. He also
stated that he felt the Staff that would be at this institute would bring money to St. Lucie County
and would offer some prestige to the medical professions in the County as well. He advised that
the concerns regarding anyone being able to walk away or walk into the facility are genuine and
that the fencing issue should handle that. He stated that other than that, he has no problem with
it and feels it would be good for the community and good for the County.
Mr. Akins stated that he would not be able to support this petition for vastly different reasons and
as he stated previously St. Lucie County has a finite tolerance for these types of facilities. He
continued that this type of facility does not benefit the existing problems in St. Lucie County,
except for tax revenue. He advised that if it does not benefit the people who are already in St.
Lucie County who need this type of treatment and cause the problems we have been facing for
many years, the he couldn't support it.
Mr. Merritt stated that his family has a long history in White City and they have a considerable
real estate investment in that area and would ask each member to consider if they would want
this type of facility next to their home.
Mr. Hearn stated that he personally would not mind having this type of facility next to his house
if it was done right. He continued that is why he would like to see this go back to Staff and the
petitioner for some further review and presentation. He advised that he would not be able to
support it based on what they were presented tonight but does think that further review may
change that.
Mr. Hearn made a motion to continue to the September 19th, 2002 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting at 7:00 P.M or as soon thereafter as possible.
Motion seconded by Mr. Lounds.
Upon a roll call vote the motion passed with a vote of 5-3 (with Mr. Grande, Mr. Akins and
Mr. Merritt voting against) to continue to the September 19`h, 2002 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting at 7:00 P.M or as soon thereafter as possible.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 15
IPU� 1
AGENDA ITEM 6: FILE NO. RZ-02-015 — WYNNE RANCH: ua
Ms. Cyndi Snay, presenting Staff comments stated that Agenda Items # 6 and # 7 were the
applications of Wynne Ranch for a rezoning of 9.9 acres of land from AG-5 to U (Utilities) and
a conditional use permit to operate an air curtain incinerator on the 9.9 acre parcel.
She continued that the subject property is located on the north side of Orange Avenue
approximately 3/4 mile west of Minute Maid Road and north one mile from the entrance to the
Wynne Ranch property and is a portion of a 671 acre parcel of land. She also stated that the
applicant has indicated a desire to operate an air curtain incinerator on the property for the
purpose of disposal of yard waste material from various properties owned by the Wynne
Corporation.
Ms. Snay stated that based upon the St. Lucie County Land Use Compatibility Matrix the
Utilities Zoning is considered an appropriate zoning, district within the AG-5 (Agricultural — 5)
Land Use designation. She explained that the existing area is agricultural in nature. She also
stated that additional Wynne Ranch property is located to the north, south and west of the subject
property and that there were citrus groves located to the east of the subject property.
Ms. Snay advised that the proposed use is considered to be consistent with existing and proposed
future land use designations in the area. She continued that the surrounding properties are being
used as either citrus groves or cattle ranches and that the permitted uses in the Utilities zoning
district are not expected to unduly impact the surrounding area or areas. She also stated that there
were no residential structures adjacent to the subject property. She advised that the rezoning of
this property was not expected to create demands on any public facilities in this area and that
public utilities have not been installed this far west within the county. She also stated that St.
Lucie County's Public Works Department has scheduled road construction on the shoulders
along Orange Avenue, thereby, significantly reducing the roadway deficiencies within this area.
Ms. Snay stated that the reclassification of this property to a limited use -zoning district such as
Utilities would not result in the introduction of incompatible land uses or activities with the
surrounding low -density agricultural activities. She also stated that the proposed amendment was
not in conflict with the public interest and was in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
Land Development Code.
Staff has reviewed both petitions and recommend the rezoning be forwarded to the Board of
County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
She also stated that with regards to the Conditional Use Permit staff has reviewed the petition
and recommends that the petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of approval subject to the 9 limiting conditions found on page 5 of the staff
report and would like the following condition to be included in the recommendation:
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 16
�FI uL
`WY 4 c
aApmv Ant-,
The use of the air curtain incinerator will only be permitted for use on this site for a
maximum of five years. At the end of the 5-year period, the petitioner may request
from the Board of County Commissioners a 1-year extension. No additional extensions
may be permitted for this use. If the petitioners wish to continue operation of the air
curtain incinerator beyond the 5 years + 1 year extension they will be required to
submit an application for a new Conditional Use Permit.
Mr. Grande stated that he believed that they had heard another petition for an air curtain
incinerator on the same property. Ms. Snay explained it is the same location and the same
property as previously applied for. Mr. Grande stated he would like Staff to explain why this is
different from the last application submitted. Ms. Snay stated that it does not differ from the
original request except for the modified conditions of approval in the Staff report and that the
applicant is different.
Mr. McCurdy questioned when the shoulder work would be done and completed on Orange
Avenue. Mr. Kelly stated that he did not have any specific dates but from what he has heard it
was in the process right now.
Mr. Hearn asked what the distance was from the site to the nearest habitable structure. Ms. Snay
stated that it was approximately a mile or two away. Mr. Hearn questioned if the previous
application was withdrawn and what the reason was that it could be resubmitted. Mr. Kelly
stated that the previous application was withdrawn and that the limitation in the Land
Development Code only applied to a rezoning that was denied, but there was no time limit for
conditional use permits.
Chairman Matthes questioned if the U (Utilities) Zoning was the only option for the petitioner in
order to be able to operate an air curtain incinerator. Mr. Kelly confirmed that was correct.
Chairman Matthes stated that he would like to see if there were any other options because he has
a problem with rezoning a piece of property permanently just for a five year conditional use. Mr.
Kelly stated that the only other option would be to amend the Land Development Code to allow
for this type of use as a conditional use in the AG-5 (Agricultural - 1 du/5 acres) Zoning District.
Chairman Matthes questioned how long that type of request would take to be reviewed. Mr.
Kelly stated that those types of requests are usually grouped together but with the direction of the
Commission could be done sooner and possibly brought to the Planning and Zoning Commission
at the October meeting.
Mr. Akins questioned if it would be possible to approve the change in zoning with a type of
clause that states the property would revert back to it's original zoning after the five year period
for the conditional use. Mr. Kelly stated that a change in zoning cannot be conditioned and Ms.
Young agreed.
Mr. Lounds questioned how far the subject property was from Orange Avenue and Ms. Snay
stated it was approximately 1 mile north of it. Mr. Grande stated that previously the most
significant testimony he heard with regards to the air curtain incinerator that was passed prior to
this request was that it was not able to function properly and had many problems. He then
questioned if there were any updates on the current conditions of that offending facility. Mr.
Kelly stated that he was not in that department but believed they were still in violation.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 17
T TO
ehs =�.i 0,§Ea
I1���'I9SS' N P Ia)VAL
Chairman Matthes asked if the petitioner was present. Mr. Matthew Wynne stated tat ge was
the petitioner and that he did have a representative from the Division of Forestry as well as an air
curtain incinerator business representative present to answer any of the Commissions technical
questions. He also stated that he had signed petitions from those who have homes surrounding
the subject property who all have stated that they have never had any problems with their
operations all these years. He advised that the change in zoning and conditional use permit
would allow them to install and operate the incinerator, which would do an even better job. He
continued that he was aware of the complaints and problems with the other facility that is
currently operating and submitted a letter from the St. Lucie County Code Enforcement
Department that states that there have not been any complaints with regards to their property in
the past ten years.
Mr. Wynne stated that they have been burning on his property for several years and that many of
the neighbors weren't even aware that they were doing that out there. He also stated that he has
heard some concerns about spot zoning and he does not consider this spot zoning because there
are no pre -determined areas for U (Utilities) Zoning and must be requested to be changed to that
zoning. He continued that the conditional and permitted uses in the U (Utilities) Zoning are
compatible with the agricultural area operations. He also stated that most of the uses in the U
(Utilities) Zoning would not make any economical sense to place out in the area of the subject
property, with the exception of the air curtain incinerator.
Mr. Wynne advised that some of the previous concerns were the increase in truck traffic. He
stated that they have been doing this for the last three years and didn't see how there would be
any increase in the traffic since they have already been there. He also stated that their main
reason for doing this is because they have over 2,000 acres of old grove on their ranch and would
like to burn that grove material as well so they can convert it into pasture land. He continued that
if they chose to keep the grove instead of making it into pasture they would be generating much
more truck traffic than by operating an air curtain incinerator. He stated that another issue of
concern was the bad road conditions on Orange Avenue and that issue is being addressed by the
current reconstruction of that area by Dickerson. He advised that the travel lanes are being
widened by two feet and then will be resurfaced (the entire road) with two inches of asphalt and
striped with reflective striping and also center bumpers may be added.
Mr. Wynne stated that he did not feel condition number three of the original Staff report was
accurate because their site would not just be for materials from Wynne Ranch. He advised that
information was not correct because Wynne Ranch is the landowner but Port St. Lucie Tractor
Services, which is operated by Mr. Revels, would be the only company using the site. He stated
that he wanted to make it clear that it was not just Wynne material that would be disposed of in
the incinerator, but just that the only company using the site would be Port St. Lucie Tractor. He
continued that this incinerator would not be open to the public and would not allow anyone else
in the land clearing business to use the site. He also stated that they have no problems with
having restrictions placed on the operations. He advised that after some discussions with several
of the opposing parties they came up with some restrictions of their own.
1. The Conditional Use Permit will have a term of 5 years and shall "sunset"
at the end of 5 years.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 18
IUl
igtf� rtpp�t��'��pgpg jqqqq IPUe
2. The incinerator will be used only for vegetative material from St Lucie
County, delivered to the site by trucks owned and operated by Port St.
Lucie Tractor.
3. The Conditional Use Permit is limited to "one" aboveground air curtain
incinerator approved by DER
Mr. Wynne stated that they have been open burning on the subject property for three years
without one complaint. He advised that his residence is actually the second closest residence to
the site. He asked that if the Commission recommends approval of their request, that they
include the three agreed upon conditions previously listed. He continued that he has had
discussions with Ms. Adams, Judge Alderman and his wife Jean and have come to the
compromise of these conditions and are now agreeable.
Mr. Akins asked Staff if they could condition the conditional use permit for a reapplication for a
change in zoning after the five-year period. Mr. Kelly stated that would most likely be
considered conditioning the rezoning and that they could ask the petitioner to reapply at that time
but didn't believe they could make that part of the conditions of the conditional use permit. Mr.
Wynne stated that he would not have a problem with doing that after the conditional use permit
expires. He submitted copies of all of the surrounding property owner letters as well as a copy of
the conditions and the letter from Code Enforcement to be kept for the record.
Mr. Merritt stated that his previous objection was the width of Orange Avenue and questioned
what the time frame of the widening would be. Mr. Wynne stated that the work has already
begun on Orange Avenue and that Dickerson has advised him that the entire project was
supposed to be completed by Thanksgiving.
Mr. Hearn questioned if Mr. Wynne was planning on having any material brought into the site
from outside of St. Lucie County. Mr. Wynne stated that they would not be dealing with
anything outside of the County as stated in condition two of his list.
Mr. Lounds confirmed that Mr. Wynne has been open burning for three years now. Mr. Wynne
stated that they are planning on taking out the orange groves, but over the past three years they
have actually been open burning the material from job sites within St. Lucie County. Mr. Lounds
questioned if condition number six of the original staff report was also a condition of the
offending facility that was previously approved. Mr. Kelly stated that he was not sure that it was
one of their conditions, but that if it was, it was clearly being violated, with regards to
stockpiling. Mr. Lounds stated that he is concerned because they need to be able to pile this
debris in advance to allow it time to dry before it can burn and didn't feel that could be done
within 48 hours. Mr. Wynne stated that he was not aware of that 48-hour time limit and that
would be a problem because the material needs time to dry completely before burning so it
doesn't smoke a lot. Mr. Lounds questioned if the conditions in the Staff report applied to the
whole property or just to the 9.9 acres. Ms. Snay confirmed it only applied to the 9.9 acres that
deal with the actual operation of the air curtain incinerator. Mr. Wynne stated that he would like
to change the time limit from 48 hours to a different amount of time. Mr. Kelly stated that the
intent of the condition was to avoid having a very large pile of material building up, unburned.
Chairman Matthes opened the public hearing.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 19
r)Al 0MO&a
�J ytl L
C
e
S.
ZOMAG
Mr. Paul Revels, of Port St. Lucie Tractor Services, stated that DEP doesn't mind if tlii rr ON APPRUAL
operation is done for six months on any parcel of land and then off for six months. He continued
that the County code is the one that states that a conditional use permit and rezoning to U
(Utilities) is required, not DEP. He stated that when they started these operations three years ago
and used open burning because it was less expensive than chipping it. He also stated that the
Division of Forestry must issue the burn permits and that if it is raining or foggy they will not
issue any permits. He advised that he employs thirty people and that burning the material rather
than chipping it, helps to keep the cost of land clearing down for homeowners. He continued that
he agreed that 48 hours would not be enough time to allow the materials to dry and burn properly
and that he thinks that it would need to sit for 60 to 90 days to dry completely.
Mr. James Alderman stated that he resides at 13510 NE 224"' Street in Okeechobee and that his
property adjoins Mr. Wynne's property to the west. He advised that he was present the first time
this petition was presented and raised several objections to the project, which is why Mr. Revels
withdrew his petition. He continued that they have had an opportunity to sit down with Mr.
Wynne and discuss their objections and see if they could reach a compromise in order to allow
him to do what he needs to do but give them comfort at the same time. He stated that the three
conditions he presented did come as a result of the meeting. He also stated that they still have
some concerns, one of which is establishing a precedent on Orange Avenue for incinerators. He
advised that they are aware that these types of incinerators can be operated correctly and that Mr.
Wynne usually does his work right.
Judge Alderman stated that they take Mr. Wynne at his word and doesn't think that simply
because Mr. Wynne gets a conditional use with restrictions that someone else would be able to
come into the same general area and use that as a precedent. He also stated that this is a unique
situation that cannot be duplicated and that the time limitation is also unique because the total
amount of time that Mr. Wynne wants to operate this type of site. He continued that the reason
that Mr. Wynne agreed to the condition of the specific above ground type of incinerator is
because they have seen that the usual trench type system doesn't work properly. He also stated
that the road improvements and these conditions are what they were looking for and that the
additional one-year extension that is mentioned in the Staff report was not part of their agreement
and therefore should not be included as part of the conditions. He stated that they have requested
that the conditional use sunset after five years and that any further requests to do anything other
than the permitted agricultural uses they would object to. He again stated that is a unique
situation that he did not feel could be duplicated by anyone else between the County line and the
offending incinerator that already exists. He finished by stating that he and his wife do not
object to the petition with their added conditions.
Mr. Merritt questioned if Judge Alderman had any information about how the Commission might
handle any other requests that may come in for another incinerator that may cite this petition, if
approved. Judge Alderman stated that he believes that Mr. Wynne's application could not be
used a precedent for someone else because they would not be able to duplicate the unique facts
of this particular situation. He continued that this application is several thousands of acres with
this ten acres embedded within the area and that the only other ranch in the area that might have
a similar situation would be the Adams' and he didn't believe they would be requesting this type
of operation there. He stated that if they received a request, it would probably be from someone
who operates this type of business all the time and that would not be the same.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 20
f.A.."n s :-
Z.
03
ON APPROVAL
Mr. Lounds stated that one of Judge Alderman's previous objections was with regard ttb` fibi,
haze and the heat plume and questioned if he was satisfied now that this type of incinerator
would have a quality burn. Judge Alderman stated that he is satisfied based on the information
he was given by Lee and Cindy Adams, who went to Martin County to actually inspect and view
the proper operation of an above ground incinerator. He continued that since Mr. Wynne is
going to personally responsible for this operation and they respect his reputation and his word
that it will be done correctly.
Mr. Hearn stated that he has heard enough testimony from those in favor of the project to
convince him that they should move this forward, but would like to see if there was anyone in the
public who has objections to the project.
Ms. Gloria Wymen stated that she lives west of the Alderman's and wasn't against the petition,
but had a question as to approximately how many trucks would be entering and leaving the
facility daily. She also questioned if the applicant would not be allowed to burn on Saturday or
Sunday. Ms. Snay stated that one of the conditions listed in the Staff report was that they would
not be allowed to operate on either Saturday or Sunday. Ms. Wymen stated that she too would
like to have the wording concerning the extra year removed from the conditions since that was
not agreed upon. Ms. Snay stated that since Mr. Wynne is requesting only the five years, they
would go by his request. Ms. Wymen questioned where the nearest fire station was in regards to
the subject property. Ms. Snay advised the nearest one was Station No. 11, which is on Shinn
Road and is approximately 8 miles to the southeast. Mr. Lounds confirmed that she resides west
of Judge Alderman and Ms. Wymen confirmed that was correct but stated she travels down that
road daily to other property that she owns on Orange Avenue. Mr. Lounds questioned if she
burns her pastures on her ranch and Ms. Wymen stated they do occasionally do controlled burns.
Ms. Wymen also stated that they burn in conjunction with their neighbor and have tractors
standing by and many people monitoring the burns at all times.
Ms. Cynthia Adams, 25305 Orange Avenue, Adams Ranch stated that the problems with the
offending incinerator to the east of their property do continue to this day. She advised that the
owner has been cited again and that she has been in constant contact with Mr. Spitero at the
Division of Forestry, who advised her that the situation has been turned over to DEP for review.
She continued that for the past year they have been in the down draft of the smoke from this
facility, it has been a public nuisance and that St. Lucie County had not been willing to step in to
remedy the situation, until now. She advised that her major concern with approving another one
of these types of operations is that the County will take measures to remedy any problems that
may arise with these operations. She continued that she did visit Airbumers LLC in Palm City,
who manufacture the incinerators and the principle is wonderful if it is applied and used
properly. She also stated that the offending site couldn't properly run their facility because of
the amount of debris they are bringing in and that she feels it has become a commercial
operation. She advised that she wants to be sure that it is on record that the problems with the
previously approved facility have gone on for far longer than they should have. Chairman
Matthes stated that he would like to strongly suggest that she present that information to the
Board of County Commissioners when it is heard before them because they have the ability to act
upon these issues and this Commission is only an advisory board.
Mr. Akins questioned if Ms. Adams was in support of Mr. Wynne's request with the three extra
conditions that he presented. Ms. Adams stated she was in support, they want to be good
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 21
�,7
�R .R��?3nv� �
,,3,1��
i
neighbors to the Wynne s, this is a very special circumstance and they would A?` Wow t5i's
�,n;n1Rf
�E,^ia�34ae
.SAL
under any other circumstance.
Mr. Joe Spitero stated that he was the Forest Area Supervisor from the Division of Forestry for
St. Lucie and Indian River Counties. He advised that 48 hours, under their requirements, would
not be sufficient because under Florida Law you cannot burn green or wet materials. He stated
that he thought a waiting period of 3 months might too excessive and that they recommend 30 —
45 days. He continued that generally after that amount of time it is dry enough, but if it has been
raining a lot then there would be a problem and would need a longer waiting period. He stated
that the amount of time really depends on the time of the year. He also stated that trench burners
do work properly when used the way they should be. He advised that DEP should be the
permitting agency for the proposed incinerator on Wynne Ranch and that they are supposed to be
handling the existing offending facility as well. He continued that he has requested a meeting
between their agency, the DEP and St. Lucie County so that they can have this all transitioned
over to DEP's authority. He stated that generally front-end loaders are used with trench burners
and track hoes are used for box burners and both can suppress a fire if it escapes.
Mr. Grande questioned why the existing offending air burner has not been able to brought under
control and if it is under the jurisdiction of the Division of Forestry. Mr. Spitero stated that there
was some misunderstanding in the beginning because they thought it was part of a County
ordinance and under their rules, they can only ask the offender to get the incinerator back into
compliance. He confirmed that Ms. Adams has contacted them on numerous occasions and they
have gone out and talked to Mr. Vickers and Mr. Tally and they brought themselves back into
compliance for a while. He advised that the pits of a trench burner deteriorate because of the soil
and once the problems are developed they have to continue to burn down and then make them
redo a new pit. He also stated that unfortunately under their statutes there are no provisions for
numerous violations and if they continue to bring it back into compliance, they must issue the
authorization until another offense occurs. He advised that they deal with three different sets of
burning laws and there are no restrictions or provisions for constant offenses in any of them. He
also stated that he feels if Mr. Wynne goes with the above ground box burner instead of a trench
burner they will not have those types of problems.
Mr. Lounds questioned if the Forestry department had a preference one way or the other with
regards to trench burning, box burning or open burning. Mr. Spitero stated that under Florida
law they are allowed to do any of those as long as they meet the setbacks but he would prefer,
under the Wynne's situation to see the box burner over a trench or open burning.
Mr. Akins confirmed that Mr. Spitero's opinion is that the debris should pile 30-45 days to allow
enough time to dry before burning. Mr. Spitero stated that is a general time frame and it really
depends on the time of the year and the weather conditions as well as the types of material.
Mr. Hearn questioned if they were conditioning the applicant to have a box burner. Chairman
Matthes stated that Mr. Wynne has requested an above ground air curtain incinerator as one of
his conditions. Mr. Spitero stated that he believes that summary would be considered to be a box
burner. Mr. Kelly questioned if they should be adding that DEP should issue the permits as part
of the conditions of this application as well. Mr. Spitero stated that DEP should be the regulating
facility since this would operate for more than six months and was listed as a condition that way
under the previous offending facility's conditional use permit.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 22
A.
4ij 1 r�
Mr. Gary Ford stated that he was the Vice President of Airburners LLC of Palm City and stated
that there is not much more he can add to what has previously been said. He advised that he
would just like to reinforce a couple points. He passed out a brochure of the different types of
incinerators for the record. He stated that there is no guarantee that Mr. Wynne will use their
equipment specifically but they make both trench burners and the above ground fire box burners.
He advised that both systems do work provided they are operated correctly but the difference is
that the trench burners are much more operator dependant than the box burners. He stated that
box burners in most instances burn much hotter and cleaner than trench burners do. He
continued that their equipment has been proven to meet all of DEP's standards and requirements.
He stated that open burning smoke levels are generally in the 60% range and a properly operated
air curtain incinerator would be within the 5% range. He also stated that there is a much higher
risk of a burn becoming out of control with an open burn as opposed to an incinerator. He
advised that the above ground boxes contain the fire and that the air being forced over the box
actually will contain the fire within the box. He continued that their manuals do give all the
specifics necessary and even include setback distances from where the air curtain should be with
regards to the nearest combustible pile.
Seeing no one else, Chairman Matthes closed the public hearing.
Mr. Lounds stated that after considering the testimony presented during the public
hearing, including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section
11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County
Commissioners grant approval to the application of Wynne Ranch for a Change in Zoning
from the AG-5 (Agricultural - 1 du/5 acres) Zoning District to the U (Utilities) Zoning
District because of the need to do so to complete the petitioners need to install and operate
a proper above ground burner.
Motion seconded by Mr. Merritt.
Upon a roll call vote, the motion was passed unanimously (with a vote of 8-0) and
forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 23
JIG
AGENDA ITEM 7: FILE NO. CU-02-008 — WYNNE RANCH: a��r i u , 1. R -
This item was presented at the same time as Agenda Item # 6.
Chairman Matthes opened the public hearing.
Judge Alderman questioned if the three conditions that they had discussed with Mr. Wynne and
that he presented would be incorporated into the motion with regards to the conditional use
permit. Chairman Matthes stated they would be read into and incorporated as part of motion as
requested.
Seeing no one else, Chairman Matthes closed the public hearing.
Mr. Grande stated that after considering the testimony presented during the public
hearing, including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section
11.07.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County
Commissioners grant approval to the application of Wynne Ranch, for a Conditional Use
Permit to allow the operation of an air curtain incinerator in the U (Utilities) Zoning
District because the presentation has addressed all of the prior concerns, this appears to be
beneficial because it is such a unique situation and is not intended to set a precedent and is
subject to the following conditions:
1. The business operation authorized under this conditional use permit shall
be limited to the short term storage, processing and burning of land
clearing debris generated from land clearing operations as defined below:
a. Land Clearing Debris means uprooted or cleared vegetation
resulting from a land clearing operation.
b. Land Clearing Operation means the uprooting or clearing of
vegetation in connection with construction for buildings and right-
of-ways, residential or industrial development, mineral operations,
or the clearing of vegetation to enhance property value and
aesthetics. The removal and destruction of shade trees due to storm
or insect damage is included as a land clearing operation.
The business operation authorized under this conditional use permit
is specifically prohibited from engaging in the business of land
clearing and yard trash recycling unless and until a new conditional
use permit is granted and the site is determined to be in compliance
with the provisions of Section 7.10.12(C) of the St. Lucie County
Land Development Code.
2. The use of the air curtain incinerator will only be permitted for use on this
site for a maximum of five years and shall "sunset" at the end of 5 years.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 24
qmvn
a+a��'�'
P pp6�i. t a Y
3. The air curtain incinerator will be used only for vegetative material from
St. Lucie County, delivered to the site by trucks owned and operated by
Port St. Lucie Tractor Service, Inc.
4. No more than one above ground "box burner" air curtain incinerator shall
be allowed on this site at any one time and must be approved and permitted
by DEP.
5. The total site area devoted to the processing, storage and combustion of the
collected land debris shall be limited to 9.9 acres.
6. The hours of operation will be from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday -
Friday. The ignition of the combustion fires may not occur before 9:00 a.m.
and must be extinguished one hour before sunset. Absolutely no operation
of the air curtain incinerator may be conducted on either Saturday or
Sunday.
7. The petitioner shall, prior to the issuance of any final zoning compliance,
which is required for this conditional use permit to be fully executed, shall
submit a copy of a Fire Prevention Plan for the combustion operation that
has been approved by the St. Lucie County Fire District, Fire Prevention
Bureau.
8. The petitioner, including any assigns, shall submit to an annual fire
prevention inspection to be conducted, upon reasonable notice, by the St.
Lucie County Fire District, Fire Prevention Bureau.
9. In the event that St. Lucie County is declared a federal disaster area
following or as a result of either hurricane or freeze damage, the County
Commission may suspend any or all of the standards above, with or without
restrictions, for the duration of the declared emergency in order to facilitate
the removal of vegetative debris.
Motion seconded by Mr. Lounds, with discussion.
Mr. Lounds stated that one of the conditions is requesting that Mr. Wynne must now go to DEP
to get all of the permits. He advised that he isn't sure about this because Mr. Wynne must now
go back and get their approval because he was aware previously that they must be the agency to
permit this. Chairman Matthes stated that the incinerator must be approved by DEP. Mr. Lounds
stated that he read the condition to mean that the incinerator be approved for use by DEP but that
doesn't mean that he is approved by DEP. Mr. Grande stated that he understood from Mr.
Spitero that this operation would be under the control of DEP, as the permitting agency and any
complaints would be made to DEP and not the Forestry Service. Mr. Lounds stated that was
okay then. Mr. Hearn questioned if this took all of the enforcement out of the hands of our
County Code Enforcement. Chairman Matthes stated that was not correct and that any citizen
has the right to complain to Code Enforcement and they can enforce those concerns.
Upon a roll call vote the motion was passed unanimously (with a vote of 8-0) and
forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 25
UNUMUIAL-
SUBJECT TO
PLARiMING & ZONING
COMNjj�,SS1041 APPROVAL
AGENDA ITEM 8: ORDINANCE 02-020 — CLARIFICATION OF ENFORCEMENT
PROCEEDINGS:
Mr. Kelly stated that this item would be re -advertised and heard at the August 29, 2002 Special
Meeting.
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 26
�NOFFUA
SUBDIFECT TO
OTHER BUSINESS/DISCUSSION: COMMISSION APPROVAL
Mr. Lounds questioned what would need to be done in order to considering allowing U (Utilities)
conditional uses in the Agricultural Zoning Districts. Chairman Matthes stated that he too would
like to have that considered. He stated this would avoid having to do a total zoning change and
then have to have it rezoned back to agricultural later.
Mr. Hearn stated he would like to get a little more information about what Agenda Item # 8 was
because he would not be able to attend the special meeting on the 291'. Ms. Young stated that
currently the Environmental Control Hearing Board is enforcing that ordinance and this would
change that to the Code Enforcement Board instead. She continued that the Environmental
Control Hearing Board meets on a very infrequent basis and it was thought that it would be more
appropriate to bring this under Code Enforcement. She stated this would deal with anything
related to land clearing and recycling issues.
Mr. Grande questioned the information they received with regards to the conference in Key
West. Mr. Kelly stated that the information was provided for their information and they are not
required to go. He advised that some of the members might feel it could be useful to them and
that the County would be able to cover the cost of the registration fee but that the travel would be
their own responsibility if they wish to go.
Next special meeting will be August 29, 2002.
Next scheduled meeting will be September 19, 2002.
Mr. McCurdy stated that he would not be able to attend the meeting on the 19"' of September.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Approved by:
Gilmore, Secretary Stefan Matthes, Chairman
P & Z Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 27