HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOCC Minutes 12-05-2006
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
REGULAR MEETING
Date: December 5, 2006 Convened: 6:00 p.m.
Adjourned: 9:50 p.m.
Commissioners Present: Chairman, Chris Craft, Joseph Smith, Paula A. Lewis, Charles
Grande, Doug Coward
Others : Doug Anderson County Administrator, Ray Wazny, Asst. County
Administrator, Faye Outlaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County
Attorney, Heather Young, Asst. County Attorney, Don West, Public Works Director,
Neil Appel, Purchasing Director, Dennis Wetzel, IT Director, Robert Nix, Growth
Management Director, Mike Pawley, County Engineer, Mark Godwin, Criminal Justice
Coordinator, Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Director, Mille Delgado-Feliciano, Deputy Clerk
________________________________________________________________________
1.MINUTES
It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the minutes of the
meeting held November 28, 2006, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
2.PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATION
None
3.PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. John Arena, Ft. Pierce resident, addressed the Board regarding the refurbishing of the
Spur Jetty. He felt the walkway was not stable enough and also addressed the Homeland
Security office he visited and the misdirection given.
Mr. Bill Blazak, Culpepper and Terpening addressed item C-3-C and advised the Board
of his disappointment with regards to the ranking of the firms. His firm was deducted
points. He also pointed out most of the firms on the list were not local firms.
The Purchasing Director advised the Board the evaluation of the firms was done
according to Florida Statutes.
Mr. Blazak requested the item be pulled until a discussion could be held on the ranking of
the firms.
Staff concurred in pulling this item.
Ms. Bobbi Conte, area resident, addressed the Board regarding FPL’s attempt to place a
coal plant in Glades County. She asked the Board to send a letter to Lee and Henry
County Commissioners regarding this project stating the county’s position.
It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Grande, to direct staff to send the
letter as requested by Ms. Conte to Lee and Henry County Commissioners, and; upon roll
call, motion carried unanimously.
4.CONSENT AGENDA
1
It was moved by Com. Smith, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the Consent
Agenda, with item C-3-C being pulled and to include CA-1 and 2, and; upon roll call,
motion carried unanimously.
1.WARRANT LIST
The Board approved Warrant List No.9.
2.COUNTY ATTORNEY
A.Extension of Declaration of State of Local Emergency- Indian River Drive-
The Board approved the Declaration and authorized the Public Safety Director
to sign the declaration.
B.Palm Lake- Facilities Use Agreement with Wave Blasters of Florida Model
Boat Club - The Board approved the proposed Facilities Use Agreement with
Wave Blasters of Florida for use of Palm Lake, and authorized the Chairman
to sign the agreement.
C.Donation of Right of Way- Xenon, S.A. a Switzerland Corporation- 9 feet of
Prima Vista Blvd. Resolution No. 06-375- The Board accepted the Warranty
Deed, authorized the Chairman to sign Resolution No. 06-375 and directed
staff to record the documents in the Public Records of St. Lucie County.
D.Florida Communities Trust- Hackberry Hammock/FCT Project 05-069-
Option Agreement for Sale and Purchase Riverview Developers, LC and
Royal Professional Builders, Inc.- Part of Tax I.D. No. 3232-211-0001-000/7-
The Board approved the Option Agreement for the donated parcel authorized
the Chairman to execute the Option Agreement and directed staff to close the
transaction and record the documents in the Public Records of St. Lucie
county, Florida.
E.Resolution No. 06-376- Authorizing the creation of the Space Needs Advisory
Ad Hoc committee an providing for duties and functions of the Committee-
The Board approved Resolution No. 06-376.
3.PUBLIC WORKS
A.US 1 and Indrio Road Intersection Improvements- First Amendment to Work
Authorization No. 2 with LBFH, Inc., - The Board approved the First
Amendment to Work Authorization No. 2 with LBFH, Inc., for US1 and
Indrio Road Intersection Improvements, for a time extension in which all
work shall be completed on or before June 1, 2007. There will be no change
to the contract amount and authorized the Chairman to sign.
B. Accept the project, release retainage and provide for final payment- The
Board accepted the project, released the retainage in the amount of $21,747.00
and provided final payment to contract # C06-02-141 in the amount of
$21,359.50( deducting for failed laboratory test and overtime in the amount of
$387.50) to Ferreira Construction Co., Inc., for the construction of the Hidden
River Estates Emergency Repair project.
C. Award of RFP No. 07-004 Continuing Services Contract for Utility Design
This item was pulled.
4.AIRPORT
A.Budget Resolution No. 06-331 for the Florida Department of Transportation
Joint Participation Agreement.- The Board approved Budget Resolution No.
06-331 for the FDOT grant in the amount of $227,000 with a local match of
$57,000 for a total cost of $284,000 for the taxiway Shoulder and Drainage
2
project at the St. Lucie County International Airport and authorized the Chair
or designee execute the same.
B.Kimley Horn Work Authorization to survey and provide legal descriptions-
The Board approved Kimley Horn Work Authorization for $11,600 to survey
and provide legal descriptions for the Air Charter of Florida, Inc.. d/b/a/ Jet
Service Center at the St. Lucie County International Airport and authorized
the Chair or designee to execute the same.
5.PURCHASING
A.First Amendment to Contract C06-10-585 with Interstate Express, Inc., for
th
Courier Services for the 19 District Court System- The Board approved the
First Amendment to the contract with Interstate Express, Inc., to increase the
daily rate $20.00 and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract amendment
as prepared by the County Attorney.
B.Fixed Asset Inventory – Property Record Removal- BOCC Departments- The
Board approved removing the records from the fixed asset inventory of the
BOCC.
C.Fixed Asset Inventory – Property Record Removal- SLC Clerk of Courts- The
Board approved removing the records from the fixed asset inventory of the
Clerk of Courts.
D.Fixed Asset Inventory- Property Record Removal- SLC Health Department-
The Board approved removing the records from the fixed asset inventory of
the SLC BOCC.
E.Fixed Asset Inventory Property Record Removal- SLC Property Appraiser-
The Board approved removing the records from the fixed asset inventory of
the BOCC
F.Fixed Asset Inventory Property Record Removal- SLC Supervisor of
Elections- The Board approved removing the records from the fixed asset
inventory of the BOCC
G.Fixed Asset Inventory- Property Record Removal- SLC Tax Collector- The
Board approved removing the records from the fixed asset inventory of the
BOCC.
H.Award of Bid No. 07-015 Tradition Field American Disability Act (ADA)
Compliance- The Board approved awarding Bid No. 07-015 – Tradition Field
ADA Compliance to the low bidder, Hennis Construction for the total amount
of $367,910.00 and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared
by the County Attorney.
6.INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE
Manufactures Product Care (MPC) Installation of Protect All Specialty Flooring/Rock
Road Jail- The Board approved the correction of cost in the amount of $43,052.00 for
floor installation by MPC as shown in the recommendation by staff to the Board on
November 14, 2006 item No C17 to include the addition of cost for the floor preparation
that will not exceed $3,719.00 The new total cost for floor prep (not to exceed $3,719)
and installation ($43,052.00 ) will be $46,771.00.
7.CENTRAL SERVICES
Millennium Marble Tile, Inc. Contract No. C06-10-567 Release of retainage-
Courthouse Annex Removal of lower row granite façade panels that are mechanically
fastened, and if required, corrections, adjustments and or repair to upper panel anchoring
3
system- The Board approved release of retainage in the amount of $8,975.70 to
Millennium Marble Tile for the Courthouse Annex granite façade project.
8.GRANTS
A.The Board approved the submittal of a preliminary grant application to the
Department of Justice for funding to assist in the implementation of a Mental
Health Court in St. Lucie County. The award amount would not exceed
$250,000 with a match no larger than $50,000 including in-kind services.
B.The Board approved the submittal of the grant application to Cargill, Inc., for
funding of no more than $60,000 to be used toward the development and
construction of a $132,000 educational exhibit at the Oxbow Eco-Center and
acceptance of the grant if awarded.
C.The Board approved the submittal of a grant application to the American
Library Association, Association for Library Service to Children, Summer
Reading Program requesting $3,000 to further the Waggin’ Tales program to
provide a summer reading and literacy program for children.
9.CULTURAL AFFAIRS
Authorize the serving of beer- The Board approved serving beer and wine at the St.
Lucie County Marine Center for the St. Andrew’s School Christmas Party to be held the
evening of December 9, 2006.
10.INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Request for board approval for MGT of America to provide an update- The Board
approved the request for the consultant to conduct a study of the IT Department and sign
the proposal agreement in the amount of $61,518.00.
ADDITIONS
CA-1- COMMISSIONER GRANDE- The Board ratified Com. Grande’s appointments
as follows:
Board of Adjustment: Bob Bangert
Citizen’s Budget Advisory Committee: Craig Mundt
Contractors Certification Board: Art Allen
Code Enforcement Board: Margaret “Peggy” Monahan
Public Art & Design Committee: Earl Little
Tourist Development Council: Pamela Haney
CA-2. SOLID WASTE
The Board approved purchasing one fuel truck from Fontaine Truck Equipment
Company in the amount of $127,589 under an emergency purchase.
REGULAR AGENDA
5.A COUNTY ATTORNEY (0:16:35)
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 06-045- Amend Historic Preservation and Historical
Commission Ordinances- Consider staff recommendation to adopt Ordinance No. 06-
045.
It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Smith, to approve Ordinance No. 06-
045, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
4
5.B COUNTY ATTORNEY (0:18:19)
Ordinance No. 06-051- All Terrain Vehicle Operation on Unpaved Roadways- Consider
staff recommendation to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 06-051.
Mr. Sean Webb, area resident, addressed the Board regarding the need for a park for the
All Terrain vehicles.
Com. Coward stated the county needed a private sector person to come with such a
facility.
Mr. Webb stated most of the land is being sold to developers and asked what happened to
the property at the airport.
Com. Craft asked Mr. Webb to schedule an appointment with his office so that they can
discuss this issue further.
Com. Grande stated he concurred with staff simply because he felt it should be handled at
the local level. He felt the county should opt out of the state ordinance and proceed at the
local level.
Com. Craft stated he would be reluctantly supporting this issue due to the fact the felt the
state was attempting to push this down the county’s throat.
Com. Craft stated he would support this issue simply because there was a safety issue at
this point.
It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Ordinance No. 06-
051, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
5.C COUNTY ATTORNEY (0:29:28)
Petition for Abandonment- Petition to abandon a 12 foot Utility Easement in Lexington
Square between lots 16 and 17- Resolution No. 06-341- Consider staff recommendation
to approve Resolution No. 06-341 instruct staff to publish the Final Notice of
Abandonment , record Resolution No. 06-341, Proof of Publication of the Notice of
Intent to Abandon, proof of Publication of the notice of Public Hearing, Proof of
Publication of the Notice of Abandonment in the Public Records of St. Lucie County.
It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Smith to approve Resolution No. 06-
341, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
5.D COUNTY ATTORNEY (0:33:07)
Petition to Exchange- Exchange a portion of Gordy Road for property associated with the
pending DRI application of Provences- Resolution No. 06-342- Consider staff
recommendation to continue the Public Hearing to December 19, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. or as
soon thereafter as possible.
Mr. Dennis Murphy, Culpepper & Terpening advised the Board they have no objection to
continue this hearing.
It was moved by Com. Grande, seconded by Com. Coward, to continue this hearing on
December 19, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as it may be heard, and; upon roll
call, motion carried unanimously.
5.E GROWTH MANAGEMENT ( 0:35:07)
Draft Resolution No. 06-298- Consider staff recommendation to approve Resolution No.
06-298 granting the Board of County Commissioners request for a change in zoning from
5
RS-2 zoning district to AR-1 for 29 lots in the area south of Peterson Road on both sides
of Bennett Road.
The Planning Manger advised the Board there are a number of lots that are less than an
acre and changing them to AR-1 would make them non-conforming, he suggested not
rezoning those 9 lots. Staff recommends the Board approve the change in zoning for the
remaining 29 lots.
It was moved by Com. Grande, seconded by Com. Lewis to approve staff
recommendation and approve Resolution No. 06-298, and; upon roll call, motion carried
unanimously.
5.F GROWTH MANAGEMENT (0:38:41)
Petition of Johnston Road Development Group, LLC for a Development Agreement for
the project to be known as Rocking Horse Ranch located at the southwest corner of the
intersection of Johnston Road and the Indian River County line- Consider staff
recommendation to adopt DVA 06-002.
Mr. Mark Brackett, representing the developers, addressed the Board on this issue and
stated he felt there were discrepancies in the developers agreement. He expressed
conc4ern with the language regarding the $450,000 improvements and the impact fee
credits in the same amount. If the intention is to give them a reimbursement, they would
like it clarified in the developers agreement and if the costs are more then the credit
reflect the same.
The County Attorney clarified the reimbursement and credit process. He also stated he
would prefer the language to say regarding the possible additional costs to say $450,000
or actual cost of the intersection whichever is more, and in paragraph 4, regarding the
appropriate credit to read the same.
Com. Grande suggested the language, “$450,000 or the actual cost”.
Mr. Brackett stated he felt item 7 was ambiguous if it states “if the Board determines it is
eligible for credits”.
The County Attorney addressed the right of way dedication and stated it may be eligible
for credits as well and this language pertains to this issue.
Mr. Brackett questioned the time certain element of the improvements.
The County Attorney stated the agreement stated the improvements would need to be
completed within 365 days of the agreement. He stated, the County Engineer stated he
would like to see the improvements completed and he did not believe they would be
exercising the option of either the time limit or a cash payment or bond as per the County
Engineer’s request.
The County Attorney stated they would like to see the improvements done before a
Certificate of Occupancy is given.
Mr. Brackett stated he felt if the development did not move forward the improvements
should not be made.
The County Engineer stated his desire was to get some assurance the improvements
would be made by the developer. If there is a question as to whether or not the
development will move forward then a bond or a cash payment may be the way to go.
Mr. Brackett gave a history of the project which has been in existence before the TVC
was approved.
6
The County Attorney advised the Board of when this issue came before the Board. The
PUD was approved in 2005 and then the first public hearing was held and now this is the
second.
Com. Coward stated he recalled this project coming through at the time of the Stop Gap
Ordinance, being exempted and was allowed to proceed.
Com. Lewis asked if this could be amended to include the County Engineer’s suggestion.
The County Engineer stated his department would like for the developer to be required to
do the improvements or post as bond that would be reimbursed if the project was
completed within the 365 days. As referenced in the development order.
The County Attorney stated it seemed the County Engineer was requesting the
improvements be made as well as a bond be posted to make sure the improvements are
made as required in the development order.
Com. Lewis stated she does not recall any agreement stating the requirement of 365 days
for completion of the improvements in fairness she has a concern in having a developer
owe the county the roadway if the subdivision is not built.
The County Engineer stated this is the first time he has seen this type of a requirement
normally a bond is required to assure the needs are met.
The Growth Management Director stated the basic code requirement states that
11.03.02 of the Land Development Code states before a subdivision plat is recorded the
improvements must be constructed and approved by the County Engineer or they must be
bonded.
Mr. Backett stated he did not have a problem with this since he would not record the plat
if he was not going to build the subdivision.
The County Attorney stated he believed if this was the case, a developer’s agreement
would not be required a condition can be added to the approval stating they would require
a road to be built prior to the Certificate of Occupancy and also provide a bond prior to
plat approval.
The County Attorney at this time withdrew this item.
5.G GROWTH MANAGEMENT (1:11:25)
Petition of Johnston Road Development Group, LLC for a change in zoning from AG-1
to PUD zoning district and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project
known as Rocking Horse Ranch – Draft Resolution No. 06-300- Consider staff
recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 06-300 subject to 15 limiting conditions of
approval with the added condition as noted.
It was moved by Com. Grande, seconded by Com. Smith to approve staff
recommendation subject to the 15 conditions and to include the added condition as stated
by the County Attorney (requirement of the intersection improvements to be built prior to
the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and also provide a bond prior to plat approval
in form agreed to by the County Engineer and the County Attorney, also adding the
provision of road impact fee credits for those types of improvements and with regards to
the dedication of right of way a condition with the option of giving possible impact fee
credits, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
5.H COUNTY ATTORNEY
Ordinance No. 06-021- Amending Chapter 1-13.8 Noise Control – Consider staff
recommendation to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 06-021 as drafted.
7
Professor Daniel Hess was present to address any questions the Board may have on noise
levels.
The Asst. County Attorney advised the Board of the changes made to the ordinance.
Mr. Harry Stewart, Skatetown USA owner addressed the Board on this issue and advised
the Board if the noise decibels would be lowered, it may cause him to lose business. He
alluded to the many times Code Enforcement and the Sheriff’s office came out to
Skatetown and the levels measured which were in compliance with the existing noise
ordinance.
Com. Smith addressed Mr. Stewart’s comments and advised him the county is not trying
to close his business down but find a level where everyone can be comfortable. He
advised Mr. Stewart he had visited Mr. Humphrey’s home and his window did in fact
rattle to the base of the music played at Skatetown.
Mr. Craig Jones, area resident, addressed the Board in opposition to the noise ordinance
and stated he felt the county was punishing one business.
Ms. Kerri Rowe, area resident, addressed the Board in favor of the noise ordinance. She
stated she would like for the music at Skatetown be lowered.
Professor Hess, noise professional addressed the Board and provided various sound level
limits. He stated the comfortable levels were 7 am-10 pm , 60 dba and 10pm-7am, 55
dba.
Mr. Stewart requested the training to the Code Enforcement officers be done behind his
building so he can be advised if he is in compliance.
Ms. Andrea Gretch, Lakewood Park resident, addressed the Board in opposition to the
ordinance. She felt the noise levels were low outside the building.
Ms. Gretch pointed out that Mr. Humphrey’s owns 6 properties in Sandlewood Estates
and she cannot imagine why someone who was so bothered by the music would purchase
more properties in the same area. She felt the ordinance would affect the business.
Mr. Philip Stickles, Port St. Lucie resident, addressed the Board and stated this county
needed more entertainment for its residents.
Mr. Paul Scholl, area resident, addressed the Board regarding the times permitted for
construction and landscaping contractors.
Com. Lewis stated she would like to have an update by staff should the ordinance be
approved if the problems have been resolved or if the ordinance creates a problem down
the road.
Com. Grande sated he did not believe the ordinance would put Skatetown out of
business.
It was moved by Com. Smith, seconded by Com. Grande, to approve Ordinance No. 06-
021 as amended, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
5.I GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Proposed Amendment to Chapter 5, Land Development Code, Concurrency
Management, adoption hearing- Consider staff recommendation to adopt Ordinance No.
06-047 for adoption by the Board of County Commissioners.
The Growth Management Director advised the Board of the changes. A change was
made to the term of the Certificate of Capacity from 2 years to 3 years with a one year
8
extension. Also on page 12, line 34 and 35, the 2 year term should read 3 years, page 39
at the bottom also change from 2 years to 3 years, page 41, line 14 also change from 2
years to 3 years. Also, they provided some common law vesting provisions in the
ordinance.
Mr. Paul Scholl, Indian River Estates, addressed the Board on this issue and stated they
needed some lee- way to the process.
The Growth Management Director advised the Board this item came from the State Law
change in 2005 where proportionate fair share contributions are required.
Mr. Jornegan, Economic Development Council, addressed the Board and stated they
concur with the need and the intent of the document. He expressed his concern with page
36 of the document item 507G3 line 10 where he felt there was no guarantee the
developer would ever get paid back. He asked why they felt there was a need to require
the improvements upfront rather than requiring a bond.
Mr. Jornegan also questioned page 35, 507G-1, he felt this said the funds paid as a
developer for proportionate fair share for facility construction can be utilized for
operational improvements rather than the construction itself. He would like this clarified
to be understood that if the funds used for operational rather than construction, the
developer who paid the fairshare, would be acknowledged to be concurrent. He also
questioned what development permit would be needed, is it a county permit, ( on page
34, 5073 ), or a specific permit? He requested the bonding provision be tied to the timing
provision as to when the improvement is needed.
The Growth Management Director addressed Mr. Jornegan’s questions. He stated the
development permit is defined by Florida Statutes. The Land Development Code
requirement is you build or bond the improvements before platting. The proportionate
share items are from the model code. Page 36, you do not get proportionate shares unless
the Board says you do and it must be in the 5 year plan.
Mr. Anthony Guettler, attorney for Pine Hollow Subdivision, addressed the Board on the
subdivision, the formal agreement and the roadway contribution by the developer.
Con. Grande questioned the reason for bringing forward this presentation.
Mr. Guettler stated they wished to inform the Board after this ordinance is passed the
subdivision is vested and exempted from the provision.
It was moved by Com. Grande, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Ordinance No. 06-
047 to include the changes as provided by the Growth Management Director, and; upon
roll call, motion carried unanimously.
6. ADMINISTRATION
Community Budget Issue Request/Legislative Issue Requests- Authorize the County
Administrator to submit Community Budget Issue and Legislative Issue request for the
following items:
Community Budget Issue Requests
St. Lucie county Airport ($3,000,000)
Legislative Issue Requests
State and County Hurricane Cost-Sharing Plan
Towns- Village- Countryside Improvement District
County Jails Housing State Prisoners
State Trust Fund for SHIP and Transportation Disadvantaged
Medicaid Nursing Home and Hospital Billings
9
Consider staff recommendation to authorize the County Administrator to submit the
CBIR Requests and the five Legislative Issue Requests.
Com. Smith commented on the rates paid when inmates are taken to the local hospital.
The County Administrator stated he has disputed this issue for a while. The hospital is
charging over the Medicaid rate for inmates and he felt this was not fair. This is a state
issue.
Com. Smith requested this item be added to the legislative requests.
It was moved by Com. Grande, seconded by Com. Lewis to approve the requests with the
addition, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
7. ADMINISTRATION
Community Budget Issue Request (CBIR) – authorize the County to partner with the
Treasure Coast Education and Research Development Authority in submitting the
following two CBIRs:
Treasure Coast Research and Education Park Office Center ($4,000,000)
Relocation of UF/IFAS Field Operations ($7,488,000)
Consider staff recommendation to authorize the County to partner with the Treasure
Coast Education and Research Development Authority in submitting the two CBIR
requests.
It was moved by Com. Smith, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve staff
recommendation, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
8. COUNTY ATTORNEY
Amended Funding Request regarding New Horizon- Consider staff recommendation to
accept the recommendation of New Horizons.
It was moved by Com. Smith, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve staff
recommendation, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was
adjourned.
___________________________
Chairman
___________________________
Clerk of Circuit Court
10