HomeMy WebLinkAboutSt Lucie LCB Agenda Packet - March 9 2011 (2)2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Telephone: 772/462-1593
Fax:772/462-2549
ST. LUCIE LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD FOR THE
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED (LCB)
ANNUAL PUBLIC HEARING
*Public hearing to be followed immediately by the LCB regular meeting*
Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Time: 2:00 pm
Location: Fenn Center, Room 122
2000 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, Florida
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2.
3.
4.
5.
C�
7.
Pledge of Allegiance
Introductions
Opening Public Comment
Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD)/Local
Coordinating Board (LCB) Overview
TPO Staff will present information on the background and mission of the CTD
and LCB.
Transportation Disadvantaged (TD)/Public Transportation Overview
The Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) will present information
related to the operation of the coordinated transportation system.
Medicaid Transportation Overview
MV Transportation Staff will describe the process for providing Medicaid trips.
Transportation Planning for Fort Pierce, Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie Village and St. Lucie County
St. Lucie LCB Public Hearing
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 Page 2 of 2
S. Overview of Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP)
Minor Update Mission Statement, Goals, Objectives and Strategies
TPO Staff will present the TDSP Mission Statement, Goals, Objectives and
Strategies related to TD service development and quality assurance.
9. Closing Public Comment
10. Adjourn
NOTICES
Items not included on the agenda may also be heard in consideration of the best interests of the
public's health, safety, welfare, and as necessary to protect every person's right of access. If any
person decides to appeal any decision made by the St. Lucie LCB with respect to any matter
considered at such meeting or hearing, that person shall need a record of the proceedings, and for
such a purpose, that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
The St. Lucie TPO satisfies the requirements of various non-discrimination laws and regulations
including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Public participation is solicited without regard to race,
color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. Persons wishing to express their
concerns about Title VI may contact the St. Lucie TPO at 772-462-1593.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to access the meeting facilities should contact
Dan Lutzke, St. Lucie County Risk Manager, at 772-462-1546 or TDD 772-462-1428 at least 48 hours
prior to the meeting. Anyone with a disability requiring transit accommodation to attend the meetings
should contact Community Transit at 772-464-7433 (Fort Pierce) or 772-879-1287 (Port St. Lucie) at
least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
Creole: Si ou to rinmin recevoua information sa en creole si I bous plait rele 772-462-1777.
Espanol: Si usted desea recibir esta informacion en espanol, por favor (lame al 772-462-1777.
i lr�
�1 ��Vj
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Telephone: 772/462-1593
Fax:772/462-2549
ST. LUCIE LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD FOR THE
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED (LCB) REGULAR MEETING
Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Time: Immediately following the 2:00 p.m. Public Hearing
Location: Fenn Center, Room 122
2000 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, Florida
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
4.
!7p
6.
AGENDA
Approval of Minutes
December 8, 2010 Regular Meeting
Comments from the Public
Action Items
6a. Election of Vice Chairperson: The Vice Chairperson for 2011 will be
nominated and elected.
Action; Nominate candidates and elect a Vice Chairperson.
6b. Job Access and Reverse Commute (7ARC) and New Freedom (NF)
Program Application Rankings: A ranked list of applications for JARC/NF
funding of public transportation projects will be presented for endorsement.
Action; Endorse, endorse with conditions, or do not endorse.
6c. Coordination Agreements: The CTC is requesting approval of coordination
agreements with Plant A Seed Ministry and Nativity Group, Inc.
Action; Approve, approve with conditions, or do not approve
Transportation Planning for Fort Pierce, Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie Village and St. Lucie County
St. Lucie LCB Regular Meeting
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 Page 2 of 2
6d. 2011-12 Rate Model Worksheets: The CTC will present for approval the
Rate Model which is used to determine rates to be charged to human services
agencies for transportation services.
Action; Approve, approve with conditions, or do not approve.
7. Informational Items
7a. Transportation Disadvantaged Legislative Day: The 151" Annual
Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD) Legislative Day will
be held March 17, 2011 in Tallahassee.
8. FDOT Comments
9. Recommendations/Comments by Members
10. Staff Comments
11. Next Meeting: The next St. Lucie LCB meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 8,
2011, in the 2nd Floor Conference Room, St. Luce County Walton Road Annex, 1664
S.E. Walton Road, Port St. Lucie, Florida.
12. Adjourn
NOTICES
Items not included on the agenda may also be heard in consideration of the best interests of the
public's health, safety, welfare, and as necessary to protect every person's right of access. If any
person decides to appeal any decision made by the St. Lucie LCB with respect to any matter
considered at such meeting or hearing, that person shall need a record of the proceedings, and for
such a purpose, that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
The St. Lucie TPO satisfies the requirements of various non-discrimination laws and regulations
including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Public participation is solicited without regard to race,
color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. Persons wishing to express their
concerns about Title VI may contact the St. Lucie TPO at 772-462-1593.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to access the meeting facilities should contact
Dan Lutzke, St. Lucie County Risk Manager, at 772-462-1546 or TDD 772-462-1428 at least 48 hours
prior to the meeting. Anyone with a disability requiring transit accommodation to attend the meetings
should contact Community Transit at 772-464-7433 (Fort Pierce) or 772-879-1287 (Port St. Lucie) at
least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
Creole: Si ou to rinmin recevoua information sa en creole si I bous plait rele 772-462-1777.
Espanol: Si usted desea recibir esta informacion en espanol, por favor (lame al 772-462-1777.
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Telephone: 772/462-1593
Facsimile: 772/462-2549
ST. LUCIE LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD FOR THE
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED (LCB) MEETING
DATE: Wednesday, December 8, 2010
TIME: 2:00 P.M.
LOCATION: St. Lucie County Walton Road'
1664 SE Walton Road
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Chairwoman Paula Lewis called the December
Lucie Local Coordinating Board for the Transpc
to order at 2:05 P.M. Ms. Lewis recogni
Representative, who is a new member of the
Ellen Higinbotham who is retiring. Ms. Lewi,
happy retirement.
At this time the
MEMBERS PRES
Paula
Cindv
June Dunn
Jim Dwyer
Arlease Hall
Kathryn Hensley
Nancy Hess
Ellen Higinbothai
Alan Love
Steve Palumbo
Jayne Pietrowski
was taken.
nnex
8 2010 meeting of the St.
station Disadvantaged (LCB)
!ed Roy Brewer, Veteran's
board'. She also recognized
wished Ms. Higinbotham a
PRESENTING
oman Elected Official, TPO-Appointed
Florida Agency Health Care Admin.
Local Veteran's Service Office
Local Mass Transit Board
Children at Risk
Local Medical Community
Public Education Community
Citizen Advocate - Transit User
Dept. Children & Family Services
Elderly Community
Florida Div. of Vocational Rehab.
Florida Dept. of Transportation
It was confirmed that a quorum was present with 12 members.
Transportation Planning for Fort Pierce, Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie Village and St. Lucie County
Page 2of5
OTHERS PRESENT
Peter Buchwald
Ed DeFini
Neelam Fatima
Marceia Lathou
Stefanie Myers
Heather Lueke
Marianne Arbore
Corine Williams
Krista Garofalo
Ed Cajade
RECORDING SPECIALIST
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
REPRESENTING
St.
Lucie TPO
St.
Lucie TPO
St.
Lucie TPO
St.
Lucie TPO
St.
Lucie County
St.
Lucie County
COASL/Commun
St.
Lucie County
Treasure
Coast F
MV
Transvortati(
Donna `,Pratt
MOVED by Kathryn Hensley that the
SECONDED BY CINDY BARNES
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOVED by
meeting held
SECONDED E
5. COMMENTS FRO
There were no
6. ACTION ITEMS
6a. 2011 M
m uwyer
September 8,
LLEN HIGINB(
I'THE PUBLII
Transit
ood Bank
e approved.
TOTED - UNANIMOUS
the minutes of the regular
0 be approved.
�M SO VOTED - UNANIMOUS
mments from the public.
NG SCHEDULE
March 9 2011 - Annual Public Hearing/
Regular Meeting
June 8, 2011 - Regular Meeting
Sept. 7, 2011 - Regular Meeting
Dec. 14, 2011 - Regular Meeting
3/3/2011 LCB Meeting Minutes December 8, 2010
Fenn Center
St. Lucie County
Walton Road Annex
St. Lucie County
Conference Room 3
St. Lucie County
Walton Road Annex
Page 3of5
Ms. Marceia Lathou informed the Board that there is a slight change
in the schedule included in the agenda packet- the March 9, 2011
meeting will be held at the Fenn Center.
MOVED by Kathryn Hensley that the 2011 Meeting Schedule
be approved.
SECONDED BY STEVE PALUMBO SO VOTED - UNANIMOUS
6b. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR (CTC)
EVALUATION
Ms. Lathou informed the Board that the LCB is required to conduct an
annual evaluation of the Community Transportation Coordinator. She
informed the Board that the main function of the CTC is to provide
safe, efficient, and coordinated cost effective services for
transportation disadvantaged individuals. Ms.'''' Lathou presented the
evaluation to the Board and informed the Board that the CTC and
Community Transit are meeting all applicable Florida Commission for
the Transportation Disadvantaged (FCTD) standards.
Ms. Lathou explained that as par
required to establish an annual
number of trips provided within tr
asked the staff if they had an,
percentage goal increase. After di
might be an attainable goal.
)f the CTC evaluation, the LCB is
)ercentage goal increase for the
public transit system. Ms. Hensley
recommendations for the annual
fission, the Board agreed that 10%
MOVED by Commissioner Lewis that the Board approve the CTC
Evaluation and set their annual percentage goal increase at 10% with
the understanding that no one suffers any individual pain if not met.
SECONDED BY NANCY HESS SO VOTED - UNANIMOUS
6c. COORDINATION AGREEMENTS
Ms. Corine Williams presented two new coordination agreements - the
Treasure Coast Food Bank (TCFB) and the Divine Group Home LLC.
Ms. Krista Garofalo, Community Investment Manager, representing the
Treasure Coast Food Bank informed the Board that the Food Bank's
vision is for a hunger free Treasure Coast. Ms. Garofalo presented a
slide show explaining the services they offer, how the food bank
operates, and their plans for the future.
3/3/2011 LCB Meeting Minutes December 8, 2010
Page 4of5
Ms. Williams explained that the Divine Group Home LLC is interested in
providing services specifically for the specialized population and would
like the approval of the coordination agreement.
MOVED by Kathryn Hensley that the Board approve Coordination
Agreements with the Treasure Coast Food Bank and Divine Group
Home LLC.
SECONDED BY ARLEASE HALL SO VOTED - UNANIMOUS
7. DISCUSSION ITEMS
7a. IM4TRANSIT.ORG CAMPAIGN
Ms. Lathou informed the Board that all transit agencies in, Florida are
involved in this campaign and that their goal is to promote the use and
expansion of transit in Florida. The action for the Board would be to
sign up - staff is looking for 100% participation by the Board - and to
spread the word.
8. FDOT COMMENTS
There were none.
9. RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
There were none.
10. STAFF,_COMME
Lathou informed the Board that the For Profit Transportation
presentative has not attended the last three meetings. She will
id a letter and if there is no response, the Board will start looking
another member.
Ms. Neelam:,Fatima, St. Lucie TPO, informed the Board of the website
in which there is a 2035 Regional Long Range Transportation Plan
Survey. Ms. Fatima encouraged the Board to check out the website
and take the survey.
Peter Buchwald, TPO Executive Director, on behalf of all the TPO Staff,
wished all the board members and their families the happiest and
healthiest holiday season.
3/3/2011 LCB Meeting Minutes December 8, 2010
Page 5of5
Ms. Lathou informed the Board that Stacy Malinowski's husband has
been hospitalized and asked everyone to keep him in their prayers.
Ms. Corine Williams spoke to the Board regarding the ]ARC/New
Freedom Grant. This would be a joint effort with Martin and St. Lucie
Counties. Ms. Williams stated she needed a volunteer to be a member
on the ]ARC/New Freedom Selection Committee. Ms. Nancy Hess
volunteered to be a member on the committee.
11. NEXT MEETING
The next St. Lucie Local Coordinating Boa
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 at 2:00 P.M.
Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida.
MOVED BY Kathryn Hensley that this meeting
P.M.).
3/3/2011 LCB Meeting Minutes December 8, 2010
eeting is scheduled for
the Fenn Center, 2000
,e adjourned (2:45
IN tuviremki
�r Paula Lewis
'h
u.�
■fi®� ■mil I�
I
f
4
St. Lucie LCB Meeting
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 Page 2 of 3
individuals with disabilities, seniors, and individuals with low incomes and is
required for funding for the ]ARC (Job Access and Reverse Commute) and
New Freedom (NF) grant programs. The LCB is involved in the JARC/NF
project selection process because the process is required to include
representatives of public, private, and non-profit transportation and human
services providers and participation by members of the public.
Because JARC/NF funds are awarded to the Port St. Lucie Urbanized Area
which includes Martin and St. Lucie Counties, for the first time St. Lucie
County is participating in a regional, competitive selection process with Martin
County for these grant programs.
ANALYSIS
Projects funded by JARC/New Freedom must be selected through a
competitive process. The total funds available for Martin and St. Lucie
Counties are $188,301 for JARC projects and $136,727 for New Freedom
projects.
On January 19, 2011, a call for JARC/New Freedom projects was published
throughout the Treasure Coast. As a result, a total of five applications were
received for projects serving St. Lucie and Martin Counties. The applicants
were:
JARC Program:
The Arc of St. Lucie County
Martin County Community Coach
New Freedom Program:
Martin County Community Coach
Medical Transportation Management (MTM), Inc.
Quality of Life Community Services, Inc.
A project selection committee ranked the applications. The Committee
consisted of one representative from each of the following
agencies/businesses: St. Lucie and Martin Counties, St. Lucie Transportation
Planning Organization, Martin Metropolitan Planning Organization, St. Lucie
and Martin Local Coordinating Boards and the Treasure Coast Mail, which
represented local businesses.
Based on information contained in the applications, the Committee
recommended funding the JARC employment transportation project submitted
by The Arc of St. Lucie County and the New Freedom senior center
transportation project submitted by Community Coach. Additional information
St. Lucie LCB Meeting
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 Page 3 of 3
regarding the balance of the funds will be presented during the LCB meeting.
The scoring sheet for each project is attached.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
• Endorse the ]ARC/New Freedom selection committee rankings, endorse
with conditions or do not endorse.
ATTACHMENTS
• JARC/NF Scoring Sheets
JARC/NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS
SCORING MATRIX
JARC - ARC OF ST LUCIE
QUESTIONS
FUbbIBLE
POINTS
SCORE
Project Need, Goals, and Objectives
210
175
Is the project consistent with and derived from the Coordinated
Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated
Plan)?
Does the project establish, preserve or improve mobility for a
targeted Po ulation?
Will a majority of the service area's targeted population be served
by theProject?
Does the project also help meet transportation needs outside the
tarcieted o ulation?
Coordination/Program Outreach
140
95
Does the applicant identify opportunities to coordinate with
available transportation operators in the proiect area?
Does the applicant's public involvement component exhibit early
and continuous outreach?
Does the project involve collaboration by at least one other group
not including the entity providing the matching funds?
Does the application include a letters} of support from the
involved entities?
Project Implementation
70
61
Does the applicant's implementation plan demonstrate the
agency's ability to complete the project within the allotted
timeframe?
Does the agency have a clearly defined marketin Ian?
Management Capability
105
104
Does the agency display experience and resources available in
providing existing services for the tarcLeted population?
Does the applicant demonstrate the ability to comply with all FTA
certifications and assurances?
Fiscal Capability
105
76
Did the applicant submit letters of commitment or other proof of
the availability of matching funds?
Does the project leverage resources?
Does the applicant provide methods to sustain service after the
rantperiod?
Program Effectiveness and Performance Indicators
70
so
Is there a quantifiable methodology identified to measure and
evaluate the impact of the project in meeting its identified goals?
Does the project contain innovative ideas that could be applied
elsewhere?
TOTAL
700
561
JARC/NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS
SCORING MATRIX
JARC - COMMUNITY COACH
QUESTIONS
POSSIBLE
POINTS
SCORE
Project Need, Goals, and Objectives
210
161
Is the project consistent with and derived from the Coordinated
Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated
Plan)?
Does the project establish, preserve or improve mobility for a
targeted population?
Will a majority of the service area's targeted population be served
by the project?
Does the project also help meet transportation needs outside the
targeted o ulation?
Coordination/Program Outreach
140
106
Does the applicant identify opportunities to coordinate with
available trans ortation operators in the prolect area?
Does the applicant's public involvement component exhibit early
and continuous outreach?
Does the project involve collaboration by at least one other group
not including the entity rovidin the matching funds?
Does the application include a letter(s) of support from the
involved entities?
Project Implementation
70
60
Does the applicant's implementation plan demonstrate the
agency's ability to complete the project within the allotted
timeframe?
Does the agency have a clearly defined marketing Ian?
Management Capability
105
105
Does the agency display experience and resources available in
Providinq existing services for the tar eted population?
Does the applicant demonstrate the ability to comply with all FTA
certifications and assurances?
Fiscal Capability
105
79
Did the applicant submit letters of commitment or other proof of
the availabiLIZ of matching funds?
Does the project levera e resources?
Does the applicant provide methods to sustain service after the
rantperiod?
Program Effectiveness and Performance Indicators
Is there a quantifiable methodology identified to measure and
evaluate the impact of the project in meeting its identified goals?
Does the project contain innovative ideas that could be applied
elsewhere?
TOTAL
700
557
JARC/NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS
SCORING MATRIX
NEW FREEDOM - COMMUNITY COACH
QUESTIONS
POSSIBLE
POINTS
SCORE
Project Need, Goals, and Objectives
210
136
Is the project consistent with and derived from the Coordinated
Public Transit Human Services 'Transportation Plan (Coordinated
Plan
Does the project establish, preserve or improve mobility for a
targeted population?
Will a majority of the service area's targeted population be served
by the ro'ect?
Does the project also help meet transportation needs outside the
tar eted o ulation?
Coordination/Program Outreach
140
92
Does the applicant identify opportunities to coordinate with
available transportation operators in the proliect area?
Does the applicant's public involvement component exhibit early
and continuous outreach?
Does the project involve collaboration by at least one other group
not including the entity providing the matching funds?
Does the application include a letter(s) of support from the
involved entities?
Project Implementation
70
60
Does the applicant's implementation plan demonstrate the
agency's ability to complete the project within the allotted
timeframe?
Does the agency have a clearly defined marketing plan?
Management Capability
105
105
Does the agency display experience and resources available in
r)rovidina existing services for the targeted population?
Does the applicant demonstrate the ability to comply with all FTA
certifications and assurances?
Fiscal Capability
105
80
Did the applicant submit letters of commitment or other proof of
the availability of matchin funds?
Does the proiect leverage resources?
Does the applicant provide methods to sustain service after the
rantperiod?
Program Effectiveness and Performance Indicators
Is there a quantifiable methodology identified to measure and
evaluate the impact of the project in meeting its identified goals?
Does the project contain innovative ideas that could be applied
elsewhere?
TOTAL
700
523
JARC/NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS
SCORING MATRIX
NEW FREEDOM - MTM
QUESTIONS
FUbbIBLE
POINTS
SCORE
Project Need, Goals, and Objectives
210
149
Is the project consistent with and derived from the Coordinated
Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated
Plan)?
Does the project establish, preserve or improve mobility for a
targeted population?
Will a majority of the service area's targeted population be served
by theproject?
Does the project also help meet transportation needs outside the
tar eted o ulation?
Coordination/Program Outreach
140
79
Does the applicant identify opportunities to coordinate with
available transportation o erators in the oroject area?
Does the applicant's public involvement component exhibit early
and continuous outreach?
Does the project involve collaboration by at least one other group
not including the entity providing the matching funds?
Does the application include a letter(s) of support from the
involved entities?
Project Implementation
70
51
Does the applicant's implementation plan demonstrate the
agency's ability to complete the project within the allotted
timeframe?
Does the agency have a clearly defined marketing Ian?
Management Capability
105
82
Does the agency display experience and resources available in
providing existing services for the targeted population?
Does the applicant demonstrate the ability to comply with all FTA
certifications and assurances?
Fiscal Capability
105
81
Did the applicant submit letters of commitment or other proof of
the availability of matching funds?
Does the project leverage resources?
Does the applicant provide methods to sustain service after the
rant eriod?
Program Effectiveness and Performance Indicators
Is there a quantifiable methodology identified to measure and
evaluate the impact of the project in meeting its identified goals?
Does the project contain innovative ideas that could be applied
elsewhere?
TOTAL
700
489
]ARC/NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS
SCORING MATRIX
NEW FREEDOM - QUALITY OF LIFE
QUESTIONS
POINTS
SCORE
Project Need, Goals, and Objectives
210
83
Is the project consistent with and derived from the Coordinated
Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated
Plan)?
Does the project establish, preserve or improve mobility for a
tar eted a ulation?
Will a majority of the service area's targeted population be served
by the roiect?
Does the project also help meet transportation needs outside the
targeted population?
Coordination/Program Outreach
140
21
Does the applicant identify opportunities to coordinate with
available transportation operators in the project area?
Does the applicant's public involvement component exhibit early
and continuous outreach?
Does the project involve collaboration by at least one other group
not including the entity providing the matching funds?
Does the application include a letter(s) of support from the
involved entities?
Project Implementation
70
18
Does the applicant's implementation plan demonstrate the
agency's ability to complete the project within the allotted
timeframe?
Does the agency have a clearly defined marketing Ian?
Management Capability
105
29
Does the agency display experience and resources available in
i)rovidinq existing services for the targeted population?
Does the applicant demonstrate the ability to comply with all FTA
certifications and assurances?
Fiscal Capability
105
30
Did the applicant submit letters of commitment or other proof of
the availability of matching funds?
Does the proiect leverage resources?
Does the applicant provide methods to sustain service after the
rant eriod?
Program Effectiveness and Performance Indicators
Is there a quantifiable methodology identified to measure and
evaluate the impact of the project in meeting its identified goals?
Does the project contain innovative ideas that could be applied
elsewhere?
TOTAL
700
218
i
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED
COORDINATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of /2011 by and
between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of
Florida, hereinafter called the "County", and Plant a Seed
Ministry, its successors, executors, administrators, and assigns
hereinafter called the "Agency":
WITNESSETH
The parties agree to coordinate the transportation services
provided by the Agency to its clients as follows:
1. In the most cost effective manner pursuant to Chapter
427, Florida Statutes and Rule 41-2.
2. The Agency agrees to adhere to all safety, drug policy,
insurance and other requirements set forth in Chapter 427,
Florida Statutes, and Rule 41-2, Florida Administrative Code, and
all appropriate local and federal regulations applicable to
transportation providers. (Coordinated System Safety Program
Plan and Service Plan are attached as Exhibit A). The Agency
shall include this provision in any subcontract for
transportation services.
3. The Agency agrees and understands the importance of
submitting to the County accurate Annual Operations Report data
within 30 days of the request for such data. Also, the agency
will participate in the annual AOR training provided by the
Community Transportation Coordinator.
4. In accordance with the requirements of Rule 41-1,
Florida Administrative Code, the Agency covenants and agrees at
all times to save, hold, and keep harmless the County, its
Officials, Employees, Agents, and volunteers and indemnify the
County, its Officials, Employees, Agents, and Volunteers against
any and all claims, demands, penalties, judgments, court costs,
attorney=s fees, and liability of every kind and nature
whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected or arising out
of the performance of this agreement to the extent of the
insurance requirements set forth above in this agreement.
5 The term of this agreement shall
2010 and continue through and including _
parties may extend the term for additional
upon prior mutual written agreement.
begin on
2011. The
one (1) year periods
In the event that the Agency discontinues its transportation
services, it shall provide the Coordinator with fifteen (15) days
prior written notice.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto subscribed his,
its, or their names, or name.
WITNESSES:
1N �-
.�A
// L==AMW
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
BY:
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION
COORDINATOR
DATE: ] /to
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Plant A See Ministry
BY: [�
NAME: �— Yj .2 ( 1 1 G Z2_ 1
TITLE: President
DATE:
APPROVED by St. Lucie County Local Coordinating Board on
2011.
ATTEST:
SECRETARY
LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
CHAIR
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED
COORDINATION AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT
THIS AMENDMENT, made this day of , 2011 by
and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State
of Florida, hereinafter called the "County", and NATIVITY GROUP HOME
dba NATIVITY GROUP INC. its successors, executors, administrators,
and assigns hereinafter called the "Agency":
WITNESSETH
The parties agree to coordinate the transportation services
provided by the Agency to its clients as follows:
1. In the most cost effective manner pursuant to Chapter
427, Florida Statutes and Rule 41-2.
2. The Agency agrees to adhere to all safety, drug policy,
insurance and other requirements set forth in Chapter 427, Florida
Statutes, and Rule 41--2, Florida Administrative Code, and all
appropriate local and federal regulations applicable to
transportation providers. (Coordinated System Safety Program Plan
and Service Plan are attached as Exhibit A). The Agency shall
include this provision in any subcontract for transportation
services.
3. The Agency agrees to implement and adhere to the
guidelines under the System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) and to have
proper documentation available during the annual on -site
monitoring.
4. The Agency agrees and understands the importance of
submitting to the County accurate Annual Operations Report data
within 30 days of the request for such data. Also, the agency will
participate in the annual AOR training provided by the Community
Transportation Coordinator.
5. In accordance with the requirements of Rule 41-1,
Florida Administrative Code, the Agency covenants and agrees at
all times to save, hold, and keep harmless the County, its
Officials, Employees, Agents, and volunteers and indemnify the
County, its Officials, Employees, Agents, and Volunteers against
any and all claims, demands, penalties, judgments, court costs,
attorneys fees, and liability of every kind and nature whatsoever
arising out of or in any way connected or arising out of the
performance of this agreement to the extent of the insurance
requirements set forth above in this agreement.
6 The term of this agreement shall begin on , 2011
and continue through and including , 2011. The
parties may extend the term for additional one (1) year periods
upon prior mutual written agreement.
In the event that the Agency discontinues its transportation
services, it shall provide the Coordinator with fifteen (15) days
prior written notice.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto subscribed is,
its, or their names, or name.
WITNESSES:
WITNESSES:
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION
COORDINATOR
DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
NATIVITY GROUP HOME dba NATIVITY
GROUP INC.
BY:
NAME: MARIE NINON PIERRE
TITLE: OWNER/0TRr C:TOR
DATE:
APPROVED by St. Lucie County Local Coordinating Board on
, 2011.
ATTEST:
SECRETARY
LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
CHAIR
EPA .---A
M-�
Agenda Item No. 7a.
lath Annual
Transportation Disadvantaged
Legislative Day
Tmesportotlan
Disadvantaged
Transporting People to Better Health
& Greater Independence
Every Trip Counts!
Please join us in creating awareness and support
of the Transportation Disadvantaged.
Most people are not even aware of its existence, much less its importance.
The TD program keeps thousands of Floridians independent,
while stimulating Florida's economy.
For every $i spent on TD services, the state receives more than $7 in return!
March 17, ao11
Capitol Courtyard
Lunch beginning at 11:3o A.M.
To register contact Shawn Daniel at i-800-983-2435 or go to www.dot.state.fl.us/ctd
Then go to "Events & Activities" - "TD Legislative Day zon"
Then download & complete the "Registration Form" at the bottom of the page.
Marceia Lathou
From: joannhutchinson@gmail.com on behalf of Joann Hutchinson [Joann@joannhutchinson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:19 PM
Subject: Advocating for TD Program
TD Friends:
I felt a personal obligation to do my part to educate the Governor and Legislature about pending legislative
actions that would negatively impact a great program. I hope each of you at the CTC, county government,
MPO, RPC, LCB and user levels will do your part to educate your local legislative delegations as well as
Governor Scott about what the TD program has meant to you and your communities. Without this education,
these proposals we are aware of and possible other ones may be adopted that would negatively impact the
program. It is critical that you do this education as soon as possible since the legislative session starts in early
March. Please help the Commission and others get the message acoss to protect this cost effective program but
more importantly continue mobility for millions of Floridians who depend on these services.
Here is the letter I am sending. I hope to see you at the TD Legislative Day and will continue to do my part for
a program that is very special to me. Thank you for helping!
Dear Governor Scott and Members of the Florida Legislature
I am writing about the successful Transportation Disadvantaged Program that the Florida Legislature created in
1979 and later funded through the creation of the Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Fund in 1989.
As the former Executive Director of the Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (Commission), I
was privileged to work on behalf of the State's most vulnerable citizens for nearly 25 of the 36 years before I
retired from public service. Because of this successful statewide coordinated transportation program, our
elderly, persons with disabilities, low income and children at risk have been able to access medical care,
employment, kidney dialysis, nutrition and other life -sustaining trips to maintain and improve their quality of
life (over 50 million trips a year are provided).
In addition to improving their quality of life, it should be noted that by providing this type of coordinated
transportation millions of dollars are being saved. The Commission conducted an independent "Return on
Investment Study by Florida State University" that projects over $8 is returned for every dollar expended on
transportation. In addition to these cost savings, the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) that
oversees the Medicaid Non -emergency Transportation Program, conducted a study by the University of Florida
that showed over $40 million dollars in cost savings due to the coordinated transportation program. Since this
study, AHCA has contracted with the CTD to manage its non -emergency transportation services which has
allowed reductions in duplication of services, elimination of fraud and abuse, cost savings and improved access
to health care. This contractual arrangement continues to be a national model and should not be included in any
proposals for transfer to health care organizations.
As can been seen in the two studies as well as the Statewide Annual Operating Reports for past performance of
Florida's coordinated transportation program, costs for the services due to coordination have remained stable or
reductions have occurred. Safety is at an all-time high for transporting our most vulnerable citizens due to
uniform standards of safety that are required by the Commission and the Department of Transportation.
I have been fortunate to work at the national and regional area since I retired as Executive Director of this
program and I can attest to the fact that Florida has and continues to be a leader in coordinated transportation.
Many states and the National Conference of State Legislatures are pointing to the Florida model as one that
other states should adopt.
As you struggle with tough decisions to address budget deficits and meet other needs, I urge you to maintain
this cost effective program under the leadership of the Commission. Please leave the funding and
administration of the non -emergency transportation program under the Commission so that the demonstrated
cost savings can be continued and that uniform standards for all these services can continue. Lastly, please keep
in place the Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Fund administered by the Commission that was created to
protect access to dialysis, work, health care and other forms of mobility that those of us with our own
transportation take for granted.
For more information about the program and the referenced reports, visit the Commission's website at:
www.dot.state.fl.us/CTD.
If you need me to testify or provide more information, please contact me at 850.524.0394. Thank you for your
consideration and for supporting Florida's elderly, disabled and others with their mobility needs in a coordinated
manner.
Sincerely,
Jo Ann HutoLlGosovz
Jo Ann Hutchinson
Former Executive Director (Retired in 2003)
Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged
401 Gould Road
Quincy, FL 32351