Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFeb. 23, 2011 Agenda PackageSt. Lucie County Board of Adjustment St. Lucie County Administration Building Commission Chambers February 23, 2011 9:30 a.m. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call C. Announcements AGENDA ITEM #1- Election of Officers AGENDA ITEM #2 - MINUTES • Action Recommended: Approval • Exhibit #1: Minutes of December 8, 2010 Regular Meeting AGENDA ITEM #3 — BA-120114219 Paul & Laura Struve • Action Recommended: Denial • Exhibit #2: Staff Report OTHER BUSINESS A. Other business at Board Members' discretion. B. Next regular Board of Adjustment meeting TBD. ADJOURN NOTICE: The proceedings of the Board of Adjustment are electronically recorded. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of Adjustment with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued from time to time as may be necessary to a date -certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777 or TDD 772-462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. Any questions about this agenda may be referred to the St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment at 772-462-2822. Form No. 07-37 1 St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment 2 St. Lucie County Administration Building Commission Chambers 3 December 8, 2010 4 9:30 a.m. 5 6 7 8 A compact disc recording of this meeting, in its, nitirety, can be obtained 9 from the Planning and Development Services DA&' ment along with these 10 Minutes.A fee is charged. In the event of}aflict between the written 11 minutes and the compact disc, the compad I control. 12,x:. t� R 13 ���� s �E}�i' 14 CALL TO ORDERx 15 Chairman Ron Harris called the meeting p der a $0 A.16 M. k F "f E thftS Ey t'^ MIMI- 17 .1 ti r St 18 ROLL CALL 19 Ron Harris V FOP,Irma � ....�� �iE`{:�iair 20 Diane And . �� M, ' 21 Richard "P� bast > ,,x ........ k ' ar c' erinber 22 Bob Ban =_ ....... 1-0lil, oard Member 23 Buddy Eme �oard Member 2425 26 f�OT S PRESEf : r ,. 27 herine Barb' ..... . ............Assistant County Attorney 28 ood ........ ........... Planning Manager _u .. 29 Lind , darviss ....................... Planner 30 Beverly's`in ..�........................ Executive Assistant 31' , 32 33 34 35 ANNOUNCEMENTS 36 None 37 38 39 BOA Minutes Page 1 of 5 December 8, 2010 40 Agenda Item #1 — Minutes of August 25, 2010 41 Mrs. Andrews motioned approval of the minutes. 42 Mr. Bangert seconded, and the motion carried 5-0. 43 44 Agenda Item #2 — BA-1020104167 Lozano, Allison 45 Linda Pendarvis, planner presented the petition: 46 47 The petition of Allison Lozano (BA 1020104157,E for a variance from the 48 provisions of section 7.04.01.B of the St Ludy$ ounty land Development 49 Code. t 50 51 Mrs. Pendarvis stated that Mrs. Lozano .lslrquesting�a�u ,. nance from the front 52 and side setbacks for a front porch i l new roof why as already been I � 53 constructed. It should be noted that t�i �s�`�`.�_ a quasi judicial Phu'�iq earing. Proof 54 of advertising for this public hearing CA""I found gJthe agent cket with a 55 copy of the legal ad which ublishenfairriber 17, 2010 "die subject 56 property is in the RS-3 (Resit!' �f,Single F� du/ac) Zoning District which 57 requires a minimum setback o 6 fiee�from the e ; property line and 7.5 feet r`44 ,zk 58 from each side property line. Th on was cb t ucted without obtaining 59 a building permit q�r# $ ME lican attimthis fact by obtaining �£' 60 an "after the fact 00 rmit FiF 61 k 62 The subject prope c nt private "( foot access easement. The house on x� 63 the ss�,�?pRrtY �01ruC� i 196p nd has a front setback of 25.5 feet 64 anp3 Meet pfbt? the ruction`i vered porch. The adjacent parcels 65 wer eloped apptsima el ,round the same time period. The granting of the 66 reque�evariance `��r��ot e ted to impair or injure other property or 67 improve�ri s in the nei orhoo The applicant provided letters from adjacent 68 property ovv $ which included in the packets, supporting the variance. 69 One of the leg, . prov was signed by Mr. Fagarass, the actual property 70 owner of the 50s easement which provides frontage to the subject ?r11 71 property. The front ` rth and new roof encroaches up to six feet into the front 72 setback at one point and less than one foot into the west side setback. If the 73 variance is granted the front setback will be 19 feet and the west side setback will 74 be 6.8 feet. Mail notices went out to 30 property owners within 500 feet. The 75 planning division received four response forms: three in favor and one not in 76 favor. The variance sought arises from conditions that are not unique and 77 peculiar to the land, structures and buildings involved, nor the particular physical 78 surroundings, shape or topographical condition of the property that would result BOA Minutes Page 2 of 5 December 8, 2010 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 in unnecessary hardship. Staff is recommending denial of the requested variance. Mrs. Andrews asked when was the property zoned RS-3 and what was it before? Mrs. Pendarvis stated it was zoned RS-3 in 1984 when the county did a county- wide zoning change and prior to that it was also residential with the same setbacks as they are now. Mrs. Andrews stated it looks like it was 6 to the ac(d1lb6cause those 6 lots equal an acre with the frontage. Mrs. Pendarvis stated she did not know the,c§revious fdt` r� land use would property. have .r a� allowed on the ,� ! �� �.� ;f� Mrs. Andrews asked another question ;� dingf.property�rprd that was provided, under the special fe%qes and yl a Bich is where # r normally {, have the permitted additions; an entry tttsays "site d e v s-f'. Site d e v is presumed to be developm 910" family, r iat does that mean? And it is from 2001. b�Tx Ril „ 3=,C� < <i� ; Mrs. Pendarvi ea shyr elieve �i ► i' Is s �1Q. at is when the property appraisers mai heir last a visit v 001 for & single family dwelling on that property. pu Mr. af`i'= rs. Lozano; -r- the reco t t ig�secretary. , Ft. Pierce, FL 34981 were sworn in by Mr. Lozano stdt"`ilk heyr;cared about the whole situation but they are going to go for it. Before;t;e.'`'e to own a really nice house and everything started G ifs � changing for thema working man, he. tried to figure out a way to provide a house for his family. They saw this property, it was pretty messed up but he told his wife that they could live there; put time into it and fix it up. They did not know all the regulations and codes. They went ahead, and then got cited by the code enforcement. The code enforcement agent said they did it without a permit. Mr. Lozano stated they did not know the process; they were just trying to fix the house. BOA Minutes Page 3 of 5 December 8, 2010 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 Chairman Harris asked the board members if they had any questions for the petitioners. Mr. Pancoast stated no questions but a beautiful job was done. It looks terrific and he supports their request. Mrs. Andrews stated she dittoed that. Chief Emerson and Mr. Bangert did not have any Chairman Harris stated they did beautii owner/builder, did he do it himself. "� AIR=3 ..{{.' Mr. Lozano stated they both did it.t° Chairman Harris asked abort the plans tf department, were they drawn§,rchitect. Mr. Lozano stated yes. E3 { `414 Chairman Ha Mr. Lozano their n-oft this No one s Chairman Ha a or questions. e assumed this was submitted else to say. building over so that they could go back to e else wishing to speak for or against e public hearing. Chief Emerson stated he did not see how this was substantially any different than a private gated community coming in requesting a variance when the property owners association has said it is ok. In this case, the owner of the access easement on which the requested variance fronts has said it is ok. Chairman Harris concurred with Chief Emerson. BOA Minutes Page 4 of 5 December 8, 2010 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 Chief Emerson made a motion to approve: After considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as set forth in section 10.01.02 of the St. Lucie Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Board of Adjustment approve the petition of Allison Lozano for a variance from the provisions of section 7.04.Of1(B), of the St. Lucie Land Development Code to allow the continued use of a front porch for a single family residence which will encroach a maximum of six (6) feet into the minimum front setback of 25 feet and a mqXJ of one (1) foot into the minimum side setback of 7.5 feet inthe(Residential, single-family — 3 DU/AC) zoning district because tho��ljan ill not impair any of its neighbors. It is consistent with the 's_ rroundinp erties and because the property owner of the accessment has said it was ok. Mr. Pancoast seconded the motio OTHER BUSINESS A. Other Business at None. I Mrs. P a�darvis beaJa'tam Chairma January. d rews Chairman up. motipt passed rs' d of Adju t " oetirlg d curre°°here are no applications so it may not g unless a Board would like to have one to do X ice``c�i��r �4yt �k d the board if they wished to have a meeting in IGX; !d not unless there is a case. The other members stated they would wait until February if nothing comes Having no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:43 am. BOA Minutes Page 5 of 5 December 8, 2010 Planning and Development Services Department MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Adjustment THROUGH: Kara Wood, Planning Manager FROM: Kristin Tetsworth, Senior Planner Planning Division DATE: February 23, 2011 SUBJECT: Petition of Paul and Laura Struve (BA 120114219) for a Variance from the Provisions of Section 7.04.01.13 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. ITEM NO. III GENERAL INFORMATION: APPLICANT: LOCATION: PARCEL TAX ID: ZONING DISTRICT: FUTURE LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: Paul and Laura Struve 6909 S. Indian River Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34982 6909 S. Indian River Drive 34-12-502-0004-0003 RE-2 (Residential Estate — 2 du/ac) RS (Residential Suburban) 1.14 acres PROPOSED USE: Continued use of a pool equipment shed to serve a swimming pool, and a shade structure in the back yard of a single family home. SURROUNDING ZONING: RE-2 (Residential Estate — 2 du/ac) AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential —1 du/ac) I (Institutional) Petition: Paul & Laura Struve File No.: BA-120114219 February 23, 2011 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way is adequate. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None Background The house on the subject property was constructed in 1965. The subject property is in the RE-2 (Residential Estate — 2 du/ac) Zoning District, which requires a minimum setback of 25 feet from the front property line and 10 feet from each side property line. The property owner constructed a swimming pool with pool equipment through Building Permit #0601- 0326, which received Final approval on August 1, 2006. The original survey of the house and backyard before the pool was constructed was completed in 2004 and depicted a shed with attached carport on the property. The shed was noted to be a CBS (concrete block structure) which would have also required a demolition permit to remove. The original shed was located 20 feet from the property line; and the attached carport was nine (9) feet from the property line in 2004. A variance for a one (1) foot encroachment into the side -yard setback would have been required at that time. The pool contractor submitted the pool permit illustrating that the edge of the water of the pool was 33 feet and the screen enclosure was 28 feet from the property line. The pool equipment was to be located at the rear of the existing CBS shed, approximately 20 feet from the property line. Further review of the pool permit resulted in a determination that the pool was properly permitted and the pool equipment was to be properly located 20+ feet from the property line on August 1, 2006. Typically, pool owners may install a small cover over the pool equipment which does not require a building permit. The existing shed to protect the pool equipment located on the property line, was added later and was constructed without obtaining a building permit. The applicant is attempting to remedy this fact by obtaining an "after the fact" permit. The survey that was submitted with the application illustrates that the shed has been built approximately one (1) inch from the property line in the front of the shed and three (3) inches from the property line in the rear of the shed. In addition, the new roof of the shed overhangs and encroaches up to 18 inches into the adjacent property owner's side -yard along the southern property boundary. There is also an orchid shade structure noted on the survey as being located abutting the property line that is also in violation of the side -yard setback. For the record, it should be noted that the house encroaches into the 10 foot side -yard setback along the northern property boundary line by 6 inches. However, since the house was constructed in 1965 it has been determined to be a legal non -conforming structure which cannot be expanded in that area. Petition: Paul & Laura Struve File No.: BA-120114219 February 23, 2011 Code Enforcement On August 9, 2010 the applicant was served with a Notice of Violation by the Building and Code Regulation Division in Code Compliance Case Number 66304 as being in violation of Section 11.05.01 of the Land Development Code (LDC) for building a shed without a permit. Further, the property owner was also cited as being in violation of Section 7.04.01 (B) of the LDC on the basis that the shed structure is abutting the fence and does not meet the ten (10) foot setback requirement for side -yards in the RE-2 Zoning District. There is also a shade structure located on the property line to the east of the shed that is abutting the fence. Additionally, the property owner was also cited as being in violation of Section 7.07.08 of the LDC due to the roof overhang of the shed causing drainage onto the neighboring property to the south which was determined to be a failure to maintain the proper drainage system. The property owner was given until September 9, 2010 to remedy the situation. Therefore, the property owner applied for this variance request on January 5, 2011. Although Section 7.04.01(B) permits the encroachment of an unsupported roof overhang up to thirty (30) inches within any required yard setback, this roof overhangs approximately 18 inches across the property line. If the applicant is not granted this variance, the new pool equipment shed would have to be cut down, rebuilt, or demolished to meet these provisions of the LDC and the pool equipment would be subject to the elements of possible inclement weather. Removal of the shed would likely resolve the issue of improper drainage onto the neighboring property. Relocation of the pool equipment, and the shed housing the equipment, to another location on the property which meets the required setbacks would be the optimum course of action to relieve the encroachment; protect the property rights of the property owner to the south; and ultimately bring the property into compliance with the St. Lucie Land Development Code. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 10.01.02, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for a Variance to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, "The Board of Adjustment shall not grant a variance unless it shall, in each case, Petition: Paul & Laura Struve File No.: BA-120114219 February 23, 2011 make specific findings of fact based directly upon the particular evidence presented supporting written conclusions that:" 1. The variance requested arises from conditions that are unique and peculiar to the land, structures, and buildings involved; that the particular physical surroundings, the shape, or topographical condition of the specific property involved would result in unnecessary hardship for the owner, lessee, or occupant, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the provisions of the Code are literally enforced; that it is a condition that is not ordinarily found in the same zoning district, and the condition is created by the regulations of this Code, and not by an action or actions of the property owner or the applicant. The variance sought arises from conditions that are not unique and peculiar to the land, structures, and buildings involved; nor the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical condition of the property that would result in unnecessary hardship. The conditions that require the variance were not created by the regulations of the Land Development Code, but by the placement of the pool equipment shed too close to the side property line with encroachment into the setback and overhanging into the neighbor's property to the south. The need for the requested variance to allow the continued use of the pool equipment shed, and a shade structure, is solely the result of actions of the property owner. 2. The granting of the variance will not impair or injure other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the subject property is located, nor impair an adequate supply of light or air to adjacent property, substantially increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, create a hazard to air navigation, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The granting of the requested variance is not expected to impair or injure other property or improvements in the overall general neighborhood. The underlying concrete pad supporting the pool equipment is approximately 10 feet by 4 feet and is located behind the single family residence. It is not visible from Indian River Drive. Therefore, the property will not impair an adequate supply of light and/or air to the public streets, increase the danger of fire, create a hazard to air navigation, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood as a whole. Granting the variance for the continued use of the shed in its present location will, by the nature of the manner in which it was constructed with an overhang into the neighbor's yard to the south, create a negative impact on the property to the south if it is not modified. The placement of the shed abutting the property line is causing drainage onto the neighboring property to the south which was determined to be a failure to maintain the proper drainage system on the subject parcel. Granting said Petition: Paul & Laura Struve File No.: BA-120114219 February 23, 2011 variance will not resolve the drainage problem created by the overhang of the roof of the shed. Further, the orchid shade structure shown on the survey is abutting the property line and needs to be repositioned so that it meets the side -yard setback or relocated elsewhere on the site. 3. The variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structures. The requested variance is the minimum needed to allow for the continued use of the pool equipment shed, and the shade structure; and to allow the applicant to apply for a building permit without altering the already constructed shed and shade structure. However, the requested variance is equal to 100% of the required side yard setback and still would not resolve the drainage problem created by the shed on the neighboring parcel to the south. 4. The variance desired will not be opposed to the general spirit and intent of this Code or the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The subject property has a Future Land Use Classification of RS (Residential Suburban- 2 du/acre) which provides for residential development as the primary use. Objective 1.1.8 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes that the investment owners make in residential property, and their quality of life in single family neighborhoods, shall be protected from the encroachment of commercial and/or other inappropriate land uses through consistent and predictable applications of the LDC. That is the basis of the Building and Code Regulation Division's Notice of Violation, to protect the property rights of the adjacent property owner to the south through the consistent application and implementation of the LDC requirements. The requested variance is not consistent with the intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and the specific provisions of this section. The applicant is requesting the variance from the requirements of the side setback in order to support an already constructed shed to house pool equipment, and maintain a shade structure in its present location. The applicant has stated that it would be very costly to relocate the pool equipment and the shed is necessary to provide protection from inclement weather for the equipment. The shade structure can be repositioned to meet the set -back or located elsewhere on the site. The requested variance as proposed is not consistent with the Goals, Policies, and Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it may not necessarily be in conflict with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan if the applicant is willing continue this public hearing to a date certain, to allow enough time to modify or remove the structure. However, based on the application before this Board, the requested variance does not conform to the standards of review as set forth in Petition: Paul & Laura Struve File No.: BA-120114219 February 23, 2011 Section 10.01.02, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Staff is, therefore, recommending denial of the requested variance. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachments cc: Paul and Laura Struve, Property Owner Katherine Barbieri, Asst. County Attorney File Suggested motion to approve/deny this requested variance. MOTION TO APPROVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 10.01.02 OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPROVE THE PETITION OF PAUL AND LAURA STRUVE FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 7.04.01(B), OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW THE CONTINUED USE OF A POOL EQUIPMENT SHED TO SERVE A SWIMMING POOL IN THE BACK YARD OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WHICH WILL ENCROACH A MAXIMUM OF TEN (10) FEET INTO THE MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK OF 10 FEET IN THE RE-2 (RESIDENTIAL ESTATE — 2 DU/AC) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE.... (CITE REASON WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC) MOTION TO DENY: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 10.01.00 OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DENY THE PETITION OF PAUL AND LAURA STRUVE FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 7.04.01 (B), OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW THE CONTINUED USE OF A POOL EQUIPMENT SHED TO SERVE A SWIMMING POOL IN THE BACK YARD OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WHICH WILL ENCROACH A MAXIMUM OF TEN (10) FEET INTO THE MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK OF 10 FEET IN THE RE-2 (RESIDENTIAL ESTATE — 2 DU/AC) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE.... (CITE REASON WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC). BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Notice of Violation St. Lucie County Code Compliance Division PAUL C. & LAURA G. STRUVE 6909 S. INDIAN RIVER DR. FT. PIERCE, FL 34982 PLANNING a DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 8/9/2010 Case number: 66304 1. Pursuant to Article III of Chapter 1-2 of the Code of Ordinances of Saint Lucie County, Florida, you are hereby notified that the following violations appear to exist on the property described below: 6909 S INDIAN RIVER DR FT PIERCE, FL 34982 Tax ID number:341250200040003 Legal description: Please see attached Violation description: Please see attached 2. The violation must be corrected by: 919/2010 3. Failure to correct the violation may result in the scheduling of a public hearing before the St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board. If the Board schedules a hearing, the Board is empowered to levy a fine not to exceed $250.00 per day for each day the violation continues past the date set for compliance. A fine not to exceed $500.00 per day may be levied for a repeat violation. The fine(s) may become a lien upon the real or personal property of the violator. The Board may impose additional fines to cover costs incured in enforcing the codes. 4. When you have corrected the violation(s) or should you require any additional information regarding this notice, please contact the St. Lucie County Code Compliance Division at (772) 462-1571.If you need assistance in complying with a Code Enforcement Violation due to age, health, financial burden, etc., we may be able to help through our Community Service Department with groups such as the N' Team. You may reach the Community Service Department at (772) 462 -1777. (,-k a'�- �anielle Williams Code Compliance Phone:(772) 462-1553 Fax:(772) 462-2522 Atencion: Documento importante con respecto a sus derechos y responsabilidades. Si usted no comprende ingles consiga traduccion inmediatamente. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft Pierce, FL 34982 Public Works: (772) 462-1571 FAX (772) 462-5214 Violations found on case 66304 Ordinance 11.05.01 SLC LDC BUILDING AND SIGN PERMITS Finding PLEASE OBTAIN A PERMIT AND FINAL INSPECTION FOR THE SHED AND THE STRUCTURE NEXT TO THE FENCE. Ordinance 7.04.01 (A) SLC LDC DENSITY, HEIGHT AND LOT COVERAGE Finding THE SHED AND THE STRUCTURE NEXT TO THE FENCE DO NOT MEET THE TEN (10) FEET SETBACK REQUIREMENT. Ordinance 7.07.08 SLC LDC FAILURE TO MAINTAIN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Finding PLEASE CEASE DRAINING UNTO YOUR NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY AND OBTAIN THE PROPER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. Monday, August 09, 2010 Page 1 of I Property Appraiser - St.Lucie County, FL Page 1 of 1 PROPERTY RECORD CARD Paul C Struve Record: 1 of 2 "Prev Next» Spec.Assmnt Taxes Exemptions permits Home Print Property Identification Site Address: 6909 S INDIAN RIVER DR ParcellD: 3412-502-0004-000-3 ��UCIE�OGy Sec/Town/Range: 12 :36S :40E Account* 40650 v,�r Map ID: 34/12S Land Use: SF Res Zoning: RE-2 City/Cntyi St Lucie County Ownership and Mailing Legal Description Owner: Paul C Struve Laura G Struve OLMSTEAD PLACE S/D LOT 4 (OR 1884-2557) Address: 6909 S Indian River Dr Fort Pierce FL 34982-7708 Sales Information Assessment 2009 Final Total Land and Building Date Price Code Deed Book/Page 2009 Final: 311500 Land Value: 193900 Acres: 1.14 1/14/2004 505000 02 WD 1884 / 2557 Assessed: 311500 Building Value: 117600 2/5/2001 250000 02 WD 1361 / 2317 Ag.Credit: 0 Finished Area: 2078 ScjFt 4/30/1998 166700 00 WD 1145 / 0528 Exempt: 50000 9/1/1978 0 01 CV 0296 / 1642 Taxable: 261500 Taxes: 5283.89 BUILDING INFORMATION Exterior Features View: - RoofCover: TN - Metal RoofStruct: HP - Hip ExtType: HB+ - HB+ YearBlt: 1965 Frame: - Grade: B+ - B+ EffYrBlt: 1988 PrimeWall: BS - CB Stucco StoryHght: 0010 -1 Story No.Units: 1 SecWall: - Interior Features BedRooms: 2 Electric: MX - MAXIMUM PrmintWall: DW - Drywall FullBath: 2 HeatType: FHA - FrcdHolAir AvgHt/FI: 1/2Bath: 0 HeatFuel: ELEC - Electric Prm.Flors: CT - Tile -Ceramic %A/C: 100 %Heated: 100 %Sprinkled: 0 Special Features and Yard Items Land Information Type Y/S Qty. Units Qual. Cond. YrBlt. No. Land Use Type Measure Depth DWBP - Drive-BrkPav Y 1 2025 AV AV 1965 1 0100-SF Res 205 -Front Ft 104.6 500 SWAV - RES POOL AVG Y 1 288 AV AV 2006 2 0100-SF Res 520 -Acres 1.14 SPA - SPA -HOT TUB Y 1 64 AV AV 2006 PA01 - POOL DK-AVG Y 1 836 AV AV 2006 ENC2 - POOL ENC-AVG Y 1 1188 AV AV 2006 PHTR - POOL HEATER Y 1 1 AV AV 2006 FEW - CHAINLINK 4' Y 1 309 AV AV 1999 THIS INFORMATION IS BELIEVED TO BE CORRECT AT THIS TIME BUT IT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND IS NOT WARRANTED. http://www.paslc.org/prc.asp?prelid=341250200040003 8/9/2010 Py �'j J'j I'M N'T ON MI, ST. LUCIE COUNTY Planning & Development Services Department Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Office: 772-462-2822 — Fax: 772-462-1581 http://www.stlucieco.ora/planning/planninq:htm DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Prior to submittal, all applications require a pre -application conference. Please contact the Planning Division to schedule an appointment. Submittal Type rcheck each that appliesl Site Plan Rezoning Major Site Plan ❑ Rezoning (straight rezoning) O Minor Site Plan ❑ Rezoning (includes PUD/PNRD/PMUD) ❑ Major Adjustment to Major Site Plan o Rezoning with Plan Amendment o Major Adjustment to Minor Site Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment a ❑ Major Adjustment to PUD/PNRD/PMUD ❑ Future Land Use Map Change 0 Minor Adjustment to Major Site Plan ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment o Minor Adjustment to Minor Site Plan • Minor Adjustment to PUD/PNRD/PMUD Planned Development • Planned Town or Village (PTV) o Planned Country Subdivision (PCS) q Planned Retail Workplace (PR" • Prelim. Planned Unit Develop. (PUD) ❑ Prelim. Planned Mixed Use Develop. (PMUD) • Prelim. Planned Non -Res. Develop. (PNRD) o Final Planned Unit Develop. (PUD) Final Planned Mixed Use Develop. (PMUD) ❑ Final Planned Non -Res. Develop, (PNRD) Conditional Use 1 o Conditional Use ❑ Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use o Minor Adjustment to a Conditional Use Variance' ❑ Administrative Variance P Variance o Variance to Coastal Setback Line Other ❑ Administrative Relief o Class A Mobile Home 6 o Developer Agreement (Submit per LDC 11,08.03) ❑ Power Generation Plants ❑ Extension to Development Order ❑ Historical Designation/Change" o Land Development Code Text Amendment' ❑ Plat ❑ Post Development Order Change ❑ Re -Submittal # s ❑ Shoreline Variance CJ Stewardships — Sending/Receiving ❑ Telecom Tower (Submit per LDC 7.10.23) O Transfer of Development Rights ❑ Waiver to LDC/Comp. Plan Requirements 9 ❑ Appeal of Decision by Administrative Official1' Armlication Supplement Packages 1. Conditional Use 5. Class A Mobile Home 9. Waiver to LDC/Comp, Plan 2. Variance 6. Historical Designation/Change Requirements 3. 'Rezoning / Zoning Atlas Amend. 7. LDC Text Amendment 10. Appeal of Decision by 4. A,Comp_Plan Amendments 8. Re- Submittal Administrative official Refer to Fee Schedule for applicable fees. All required materials must be included at the time of submittal along with the appropriate non-refundable fee(s). Page 1 of 6 Revised rune 21, 2010 FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS -- Planning Division Application Type I) (,C'' _„__,_ Supplemental Application Pac age No.: (Please provide separate fee calculation worksheet for each application type) ❑ BASE REVIEW FEE: ❑ CONCURRENCY FEE ❑ ERD REVIEW FEE: ❑ PER ACREAGE CHARGE: RESUBMITTAL FEE: (if applicable) D OTHER $ SUBTOTAL OF BASIC FEES:, $`� ❑ PRE -APPLICATION MEETING FEE (F) $( ) deduction Receipt No. of Payment: Date of Pre App: BALANCE OF FEES DUE: $ SEPARATE CHECK FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY — Ordinance No. 06-047; amending Chapter 6.11.01 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code ❑ $950.00 - Methodology Meeting (G) (If Applicable) • Additional flees will be due if a 3`d party traffic study review is needed, These services will be invoiced to applicant upon receipt of quote of services from 3' party. • Please note: For all projects requiring public notice, you will b invaiced by St. Lucie County Planning Division. Refer to "Public Procedures". • Other fees may be applicable by other external reviewing ag c' s; ie._Fjfei t c and proof of payment will be required prior to project approval. Pre -Application Me n eqf� !J -� Page 2 of 6 Revised June 21, 2010 Submittal Requirements The following checklist is provided as a reminder. Please see applicable code sections for more detailed submittal requirements. All Submittals MUST be in complete folded and collated sets. All applications must Include the following:1 V0 Application, completed in black ink, with property owner signature(s) and notary seal (1 original an 11 `r` copies) El Aerial Photograph — property outlined (available from Property Appraiser's office) lid" Property Deed Z Legal description, in MS Word format, of subject property Q Property Tax Map — property outlined (electronic copy not required) j d Survey C'1 2 CDs of all documents submitted -'with files named according to the Required Naming List. (attached) • Concurrency Deferral Affidavit; or ❑ Description and analysis of the impact of the development on public facilities in accordance with the methodologies acceptable to the County (LDC Section 6.08,02). This will require a Transportation Assessment or a full Traffic Impact Report, if applicable. Site Plan and Planned Development Applications must also include: Site Plan 24"x36" at a scale of V=50' (12 copies- folded, not rolled) ❑ Boundary Survey -- Signed and Sealed (12 originals) • Topographic Survey —Signed and Sealed (12 originals) • Landscape. Plan Signed and Sealed (12 originals) ❑ Traffic Impact Report (TIR) (4 copies) if: o 50+ residential units o Development on N. or S. Hutchinson Island o ,Non-residential (see LDC Section 11.02.09(4)) ❑ Environmental Impact Report (4 copies) if: (See LDC Section 11.02.09(5)) o The property is ten acres or greater o The property, regardless of size, contains a wetiand; o The property is identified on the "Native Habitat Inventory for SLC"; o The proposed development is located in whole, or part, within the One Hundred Year Flood Plain; o Development on N. or S. Hutchinson Island Development Order Extension Applications only require the following: ❑ Letter of justification —submitted at least 2 weeks prior to expiration. (LDC 11.02.06) ❑ Updated Traffic Analysis if applicable (4 copies) Approved Resolution or GM Order *Please note: Only a surveyor, attorney, or title agent is authorized to provide a legal description. The legal description provided on the property appraiser's website is not valid for our purposes. The legal description you provide us will be used in all future documentation. If it is incorrect, it will invalidate the results of any hearing(s). Page 3 of 6 Revised June 21, 2010 Project Name: Site address: _ Parcel ID Nurr Project Information SDz - 66OV- pooI3 Legal Description: (Attach additional sheets if necessary — also must be provided in MS Word format on CD) 76 r/1 4e CA-Cl PfO-Ce- 516 4074- �K6t<JW_'ZS-S e_ 3 49£,z. Property location — Section/Township/Range: _/;A 3(Q S. .41DF' Property size — acres: 3. 7 Square footage: t� g , IC6> SF Future Land Use Designation: 4: t Zoning District: f✓. Description of project: if necessarv) Type of construction (check all applicable boxes): ❑ Commercial Total Square Footage: Existing Proposed: 11 Industrial To Square Footage: Existing Proposed: ❑ Residential No. of residential units: Existing Proposed. - No, of subdivided lots: Existing Proposed: Other Please specify: lt) Oy Number and size of out parcels (if applicable): Page 4 of 6 Revised June 21, 2010 SPECIAL NOTICE (PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BELOW) Submissionofthis application does not constitute the granting of approval. All appropriate requirements must be met prior to this project being presented for approval to the appropriate authority. St. Lucie County reserves the right to request additional information to ensure a complete review of this project. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Applicant Information (ProveLty Develo 'er Agent Information: Business Name: Business Name: Name: Name: Address; (Please use an address that can accept overnight packages) Phone: Fax: Address: (Please use an address that can accept overnight packages) Phone Fax Email: . ( i Email: Please note: both applicant and agent will receive all official correspondence on this project, Property Owner Information This application and any application supplement will not be considered complete without the notarized signature of all property owners of record, which shall serve as an acknowledgment of the submittal of this application f approval. The property owner's signature below shall also serve as authorization for the above applicant V a ent t t o :4b4f of said -property owner. ��/7 &l X a � 66A�t""l� U ropeny OwnerSE95016W Propertywner Name (PrFnted) Mailing Address: Phone: ~772: - 17193 '2.36— -- II - If more than one owner, please submit additional ! e f'(e 3119 ff �.. pages STATE OF F , COUNTY OF -_L1V1(' J �;� The for s re -going instrument was acknowledged before me this day off ; 20 f 1 by C• r U 1/ whocis onally ersknown talxre or who has produced .._ _. .ln as identification. Al.�C �{',//�C.?y1df} i�l Signature o Numay Type or Print Name of Notary 630-1 q / Commission Number (Seal) NOTARYPUBLIC•STATE OF FLORIDA Alisa Randolfl _ = Commission # EE030741. V,,,p,�s' Expires: SEP. 29, 2014 BONDED TRW ATLANTIC BONDBQG CO.,1NC. Page 5 of Revised June 21, 2010 SPECIAL NOTICE (PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BELOW) Submission of this application does not constitute the granting of approval. All appropriate requirements must be met prior to this project being presented for approval to the appropriate authority. St. Lucie County reserves the right to request additional information to ensure a complete review of this project. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Applicant Information (ProyertyDeveloper Agent Information: [Business Name: /� Business. Name: Name: l Name: Address: Address: (Please use an address that can accept overnight (Please use an address that can accept overnight packages) packages) Phone: Phone: Fax: Fax: Email: Email: Please notes both applicant and agent will receive all official correspondence on this project. Property Owner Information This application and an application supplement will not be considered complete without the notarized signature of all property owners of record, which shall serve as an acknowledgment of the submittal of this application for approval. The property owner's signature below shall also serve as authorization for the above applicant or agent t act on behalf of said property owner. Property uwnersignature Property Owner Narre rinlea) Mailing Address: t>r-- W t, Phone: 7 2- If more than one owner, please submit additional pages STATE OF COUNTY OF n/CA•-- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this y day of 0 AJ , 20 by -�'fi-v who i ers ally known to fie or who has produced as identification. y ignature of NolaY C n Type or Print Name of o ary r' Commission Number (Seal) NOTARY PUBLIC -STATE OF FLORWA Ate, Alisa RandolSt sm Commission # HE030741 SEP. 29, 2014 BONDED THRV AT; .,v r C no\'DING ca, IXC. Page 5 of 6 Revised June 21, 2010 Required Document Namin List * All electronically submitted documents must be formatted and named according to the list below. If your submittal includes a document not on the list, the document name shall clearly reflect the content of the submitted document. Document Document Format Required Name on CD Aerial. Photograph. PDF Aerial. df Application PDF Ap lication. df Approval Order PDF A rovalOrder. df Architectural Elevations PDF ArchElev. df Boundary/Topographic Sqyg PDF BoundarYTOPO.pdf Draina e / Stormwater Plan PDF Draina ePln. ` df Easements PDF Easements. df Environmental Impact Report PDF or Word EIR. df or EIR.doc Existing Condition Plan PDF Existin Gond. df Flood Plain PDF or Word Flood. df or Flood. Doc Landscape Plan PDF Landsca e. df' Le al Description Word Le al.doc Light!n Plan PDF Li htin . df Mitigation Plan PDF Miti ation. df Mobile Home Plans PDF or Word MobileHome. df or MobileHome.doc Paving Plan PDF Pavin . df Permit External PDF Permit. df Plat PDF Plat. df or Plat.doc Property Deed PDF Deed. df Site Plan PDF SitePlan. df Traffic Impact Report PDF or Word TIR. df or TIR.doc. Tree Survey PDF Tree. df Turtle Protection PDF or Word Turtle, df or Turtle.doc Utiliity Plan PDF Utiliit . df Ve etation Removal Application PDF Ve etation. df Page 6 of 6 Revised June 21, 2010 M H Gable & Associates A Limited LiabilityCompany 1123 CAPITANILLA DRIVE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32963 772.473.7644 LOOKING WEST ALONG PROPERTY LINE LOOKING EAST TO STRUVE RESIDENCE STRUVE RESIDENCE AND SHED-- JANUARY 2011 M H Gable & Associates it ad L i a b i l it y C o m p a n y 1123 CAPITANILLA DRIVE, VERO BEACH FLORIDA 32963 772.473.7644 LOOKING TO THE SOUTH CLOSER VIEW LOOKING SOUTH TO ADJACENT PROPERTY STRUVE RESIDENCE AND SHED---JANUARY 2011 M H Gable & Associates A Li m i t e d Liability Company - - 1123 C"rFANILLA DRIVE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32963 772.473.7644 LOOKING SOUTHEAST TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OVERALL VIEW LOOKING EAST TO STRUVE RESIDENCE STRUVE RESIDENCE AND SHED- JANUARY 2011 m NCLCL �r GO �t� tv6t m ally j :.,, «d':aP w,,.r •'' � w n%i 10 /' I 419ZN� 19 MU --.If a is & m A A -A i1n19 a PN9 -Ml 19110d m H �N .,...PH uUlYunf r, .[,,/u 3 'G+ aleu cjwj'"; E PH e0 M19 Uuonnj F >�FI 11 A.H fiISuq Arnpd P 9 ulU,l do 1 '�' PH apul ula9 � q a F. to � Yq5 onV emmw9 Awjr na nwsu4a' \�, � Y '�a sr/ vrya vNe g� y c � tt PH leuup -PWH 7 n H DuIPP&I IL W c! u 9 PH u6111e0 1U 3 4Z•a 4g a Iw'e 'd I � d,6 �IINIIX R�unoa o©gorraa9>fp a) L U) 75 cu N � h (0 C f0 all m V C t tPN�Rt�IER'�R cc 1 1 `a :3 , o 1 1 G -© 1 1 U 0C 1 a N. 1 N CG 1 O O 1 cu V N 1 Z A (� N 1 d� 1 V U).- m, U 1 Ua� 1 1 � ok aw Q A m N U f/) Lo 1 � � 1 1 1 1 -mp ■ mm 00 N t0 W O O O t0 O t0 kD M n n n n n M n co N N N t0 N N N N M N N N m N 00 M 00 00 N W W W W N W W W M W CL Ol In M q N T Ol 01 01 O D7 41 Ol m Ol v m "I'c{ N a a V a m st 7 a Nm V N m m m m M m M m m m M m M m 9 Y {J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J /I LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL N d L V N C O/ tp C K a U� V U •j U U U V Y V U U h V N 3 N 01 C Ol N 01 N O O) N N U1 •a L 'a •a o •a •a 'a 'a .`O •aa •a L 'a r A r r 0 C E 0 0 r 0 C V LL (n LVL LLO. � LL l0 L LLLlOi LL LL O > O m m Y > 01 > Y > > > > > > i N > 0_' L N R C m 00 0) f0 tom-' 10 0 0 u 5 N N N C~ O Cai C C C C C C C E m o y V) N G. to 2 to Vf to to to to m U to .-1 O N n e-1 n .-1 .-t to O n m 0 0 to 9�.l mmvoosmv*wmomo Q n w m w n n n l0 W t0 t0 t0 m m n d E m c � LL LL V C T O m C7 C t C N 7 O O) Lo E N c c J N C O N W O w M YO N O m co Q K Vf 2 d E 07 Lu C 0 L Y C N C fO Q N 7 2 O V O L 3- o m ° c m o m v to' m D O LL a n u 0C } a z a 3 LL 01 E �„ 7 c 3oF- 0 01 LL W O C L O -'wm > > @ m O u0 2E OQm 0W LL, cO d.2 w to C m 9 O0 0 Ol m W O W Q N t0 m l0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 JW N0ppo o r,-1 OW M oO0m om m m to O 10 '1 0 O O O qO O O O O O oOpO pppppO ppp 0o 0ovoov000 m m N to O m m mN o N A m .-1 .4 N V N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N —1 'i O li e-I .-1 -1 r-1 1-1 r-I N N 'i Q t v a v O It v v v v v v v a v a m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Jul! Arnold 7101 S Indian River Dr Fort Pierce FL 34983 Public Hearing Date: FEBRUARY 23, 2011 Location: BOCC Chambers SLC Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft Pierce, Florida 34982 Time: 9:30 AM Applicant: Paul & Laura Struve Property Location: 6909 So Indian River Drive Zoning: RE- 2 Future Land Use: RS Residential Suburban Staff Recommendation: Denial Rd PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Wednesday February 23, 2011 Notice of Proposed Variance Request 6909 So. Indian River Drive Public Hearing Description: Petition of Paul and Laura Struve (BA 120114219), for a Variance from the Provisions of Section 7.04.01.13, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to allow the continued use of a pool equipment shed to serve a swim- ming pool in the back yard of a single family residence which will encroach a maximum of ten (10) feet into the mini- mum side yard setback of 10 feet RE-2 (Residential Estate, Single -Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District. Further details are available in the Planning and Development Services Department —please contact: Staff Kristin Tetsworth tel. 772.462.6455 Email tetsworthkO-stlucieco.org Mail 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 The St. Lucie County Board of Adjust- ment has the power to authorize vari- ances from the dimensional require- ments of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, in accordance with the provisions of Section 10.01.00, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard. Written com- ments received in advance of the pub- lic hearing will also be considered. Written comments to the Board of Ad- justment should be received by the Planning and Development Services Department - Planning Division at least 3 days prior to the scheduled hearing. Anyone with a disability requiring ac- commodations to attend this meeting may contact the SLC Community Risk Manager at least 48 hrs in advance @ 772.462.1546 or TDD 772.462.1428 Date Mailed: February 11, 2011 Paul & Laura Struve, 6909 South Indian River Drive, Fort Pierce Lot #4, OLMSTEAD PLACE, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page (s) 64, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. AND Commence at the intersection of the South Line of Lot 5 of OLMSTEAD PLACE and Easterly right of way line of the FEC railway: thence run Easterly on the South line of said Lot 5, 554.54 feet to a point; thence run northerly and parallel to said easterly R/W line of FEC Railway to a point on the Northerly line of said lot #5; that is 549.63 feet Easterly of said East R/W line of FEC Railway; thence run Westerly on the Northerly line of said Lot 5, 549.63 feet, to the Easterly R/W line of FEC Railway; thence run Southerly along the Easterly R/W line of FEC Railway, 102.7 feet to the point of beginning, St. Lucie County, Florida. Foreign Account Number 11504098 Ad # 2233270 Ad Net Cost $77.59 Name (Primary) ST LUCIE COUNTY BOCC Company (Primary) ST LUCIE COUNTY BOCC Street 1 (Primary) ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUPE City (Primary) FT PIERCE State (Primary) FL ZIP (Primary) 34982 Phone (Primary) (772) 462-1692 Class Code 9424SC - Notice of Meeting Start Date 2/11/2011 Stop Date 2/11/2011 Prepayment Amount $0.00 Ad Sales Rep. 190 - Barbara Wentzel Width 2 Depth 160 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA FEBRUARY 23, 2011 NOTICE OF PROPOSED VARIANCE REQUEST Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the Provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan that the following applicants have re- quested that the St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment consider the following request: Petition of Paul and Laura Struve (BA 120114219), for a Variance from the Provisions of Section 7.04.01.6, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to allow the continued use of a pool equipment shed to serve a swim- ming pool in the back yard of a single family residence which will encroach a maximum of ten (10) feet into the min- imum side yard setback of 10 feet RE-2 (Residential Estate, Single -Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described property: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot #4, OLMSTEAD PLACE, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page (s) 64, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. AND Commence at the intersection of the South Line of Lot 5 of OLMSTEAD PLACE and Easterly right of way line of the FEC railway: thence run Easterly on the South line of said Lot 5, 564.54 feet to a point; thence run northerly and parallel to said easterly R/W line of FEC Railway to a point on the Northerly line of said lot #5; that is 549.63 feet Easter- Iy of said East R/W line of FEC Railway; I hence run Westerly on the Northerly line of said Lot 5, 549.63 feet, to the Easterly R/W line of FEC Railway; thence run Southerly along the Easterly R/W line of FEC Railway, 102.7 feet to the point of beginning, St. Lucie Coun- ty, Florida. LOCATION: 6909 S. Indian River Drive, Fort Pierce, FL The Public Hearing on the petition will be held in Commission Chambers, Rog- er Poitras Annex of the St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on Wednesday, February 23, 2011, begin- ning at 9:30 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard. Written com- ments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Written comments to the Board of Ad- justment should be received by the Planning and Development Services Department - Planning Division at least 3 days prior to the scheduled hearing. The petition file is available for review at the Planning and Development Serv- ices Department offices located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida, during regular business hours. Please call 772/462-2822 or TDD 772/462-1428 if you have any questions or require ad- ditional information. The St. Lucie County Board of Adjust- ment has the power to authorize vari- ances from the dimensional require- ments of the St, Lucie County Land De- velopment Code, in accordance with the Provisions of Section 10.01.00, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The proceedings of the Board of Adjust- ment are electronically recorded. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Flori- da Statutes, if a person decides to ap- peal any decision made by the Board of Adjustment with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to en- sure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings is made, which record in- cludes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying dur- ing a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any in- dividual testifying during a hearing upon request. f it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued from time to time as may be necessary to a date -certain. Nnyone with a disability requiring ac- commodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Risk Manager at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462- 1546 or T.D.D. (772)462-1428. Any questions about this agenda may be re- ferred to St. Lucie County Planning Di- vision at(772) 462-2822. 30ARD OF ADJUSTMENT )T. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA s/ RON HARRIS - CHAIRMAN 'ublish: February 11, 2011 !233270 9CES 'A S'd -'N AMIG nfla A I geogi U05v4soax emjow Ana T ladd-eyl puu ToXoAjnSTeu0'ssQJOJd 3Andis vdnvi .W... to 'Idpoom Wfll!ff GNV invd woy WE. -min 0 04. IM ar gig 6 Nkagi o< Mxpa bi m C) 0 R