HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinton Sun IncBOARD OF COUNTY COUNTY
ATTO R N 6Y
Daniel S. M~C Intyre
Krista A. Storey ASSISTANT COUNTY A170RNEY
Heather Young ASSISTANT COUNTY A]-fORNEY
Sharon Phillips Brennan ASSISTANT COUNTY A'J'TORNEY
January 30, 1987
Robert Lloyd, Esquire
Neill, Griffin, Jeffries & Lloyd
Post Office Box 1270
Fort Pierce, Florida 33454
Dear Bob:
RE: Minton Sun, Inc.
Thank you for your letter of Janaury 28, 1987.
your opinion as set out in the letter. ~.
Sincerely,
DSM/I j t
I agree with
Daniel S. MCIntyre
County Attorney
Copy~ to: Community Development Coordinator
HAVERT L. FENN, District No. I · JUDY CULPEPPER, District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No.. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5
County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS
2300 Virginia 'Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Ext. 214
RICHARD V. NEILL
CHESTEB B. GRIFFIN
MICHAEL JEFFRIES
ROBERT M. LLOYD
g- STEPHEN TIERNEY,~[I
HAROLD G. MELVILLE
BRUCE R. ABERNETHY,
'RICHARD V. NE LL, JR.
LAW OP-F~ C ES
NE:ILL GRIFFIN UEFFRIES E. LLOYD
CHARTERED
3]1 SOUTH SECOND STREET
FORT PIERCE,.FLORIDA 33450
January 28, 1987
JAN 29 ]986
COUNTY ATTORNEY
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLI~P, IBA
MAILING ADDRESS:
POST OFFICE BOX J270
FORT PIERCE FL 33~54
TELEPHONE (305) ~6~-~200
Daniel McIntyre, Esquire
St. Lucie County Attorney
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, Florida 33450
Re: Property owned by Minton Sun, Inc.
and Indianola Groves #3 situate at the Northeast corner
of Angle Road and Kings Highway in St. Lucie County, Floridai
Dear Dan:
Z recently received copies of Ordinance No. 86-87 changing the
Future Land Use Classification of the above property from SU to
IL as recorded in Official Record Book 526 at Page 2528 of the
Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, and Resolution No~.
86-288 changing the zoning classification of~said property from
AR-1 ~to IL as recorded in Official Record Book 526 at Page 2562
of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Copies of
the Ordinance and Resolution are enclosed for your ready
reference.
I no~e upon reviewing the Ordinance and Resolution that in
Paragraph A there is a statement to the effect that the subject
property is owned by Minton Sun, Inc. In fact, as shown in the
Petition ~to Amend the Future Land Use Classification and for
Rezoning, that portion of the property described in the first
paragraph of the legal description .set forth in the Ordinance and-
the Resolution is owned by Minton Sun, Inc. and that portion of~'
~he proper~y shown in the second paragraph of the legal
description is owned by Indianola Groves No. 3'. In my opinion,
Daniel McInty, re, Esquire
January 28, 1987
Page Two
this omission does not affect the validity of the ordinance or
the resolution since all of the property is properly described.
If you agree, please give me a letter confirming this opinion at
your earliest convenience.
With best regards.
RML/pw
Enco
cc: Mr. O. R. Minton
Very truly yours,
/
Robert M. LlOyd
NE:ILL GEIFF'IN JEF'F'RIE$ & LLOYD
OI:CD i'lZRNCE NO. 86-87
$00327
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING T~E ST. LUCIE COUNTY
GROWT~ MANAGEMENT POLICY PLAN, ORDINANCE
NO. 86-01 BY CHANGING THE LAND ~SE DESIGNATION
OF THE PROPERT~ LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNEl{
OF KINGS HIGBWAy AND ANGLE ROAD (MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN) FROM SU (SEMI URBAN) TO IL
(INDUSTRIAL, LIGHT); MAKING FINDINGS; PROVIDING
FOR MAKING THE NECESSARy CHANGES ON THE
ZONING MAP OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY; OFFICIAL
PROVIDING FOR
CONFLI _CTING PROVISIONS AND SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR FILING WIT~ THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND
THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITy AFFAIRS AND FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE AND ADOPTION.
W~EREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida, has made the following determinations:
1. Minton Sun, Znc. and Indianola Groves (No. 3), a Florida
Partnerhsip presented a l~tition to ~Jnend the future land use
classification set forth-in the St. Lucie County GrOWth
Management Polic~ Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to ~ ~(Industrial,
Light) fOr the property described below.
2. The St. Lucie County Local Pl~ning Agency, after
holding a public hearing on December 10, !986 of which due notice
was published at least seven (7) days prior to said hearing and
all owners of property within five hundred feet (500') were
notified by mail of said hearing, has recommended that the Board
amend .the future land use classification set forth in the St.
Lucie County Growth F~nagement Plan from ~ (Semi Urban) to ~L
(Industrial, Light) for the petitioned property in its entirety.
3. The Board held a Public hearing on December 18, 1986,
~fter publishing a notice of such hearing in the Fort Pierce News
Tribune on December 9' and December lO, 1986.
NM, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Boa rd of
Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida:
The future land use classification set forth in the St.
Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan for that property
described as follows:
Co un ty
From the Southwest corner of Section 36,
Township 34 South, Range 39 East, run East 25
feet; Thence run North parallel with the West
line of Section 36, 227.66 feet to the North
right of way line for Canal C-25 for the
point of beginning: Thence continue North
517.34 feet; thence run East parallel with
the South line of Section 36, 559.7 feet;
thence run South parallel with the West line
of Section 36, 517.46 feet to the North line
of Canal C-25; thence run West 559.7 feet to
the point ~f. beginning. (6.65A)
and
Section 36, Township 34S, Range 39E - SW 1/4
of SW 1/4 - less N 517.34 feet of S 745 feet
of E 559.7 feet of W 584.7 feet & tess SFW~D ·
& Roads (26.08 AC).
owned by ~4/nton Sun, Inc., be, and the same is hereby changed
from SU (Semi Urban) to IL (Industrial, Light).
B. FINDING 'OF CONEISTENC~.
This Board specifiCally determines that the approved
change in future land use plan is consistent with the policies
and objectives contained in the St. -Lucie County Growth
Management Polic~ Plan.
C. CSAN~ES TO ZONIN~ MA~.
The-.. St. Lucie Count~ Community Development Director is
hereb3 authorized and directed to cause the changes to be made on
the~ Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make
notation of reference to the date of adoption of this ordinance.
5 2 6 5 2 9
D. CONFL ! CTIlk~ PROVISION:-_,.
Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable o y
to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinan_~s
and. County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with thisul
ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extemt
of such conflict.
E.
If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason
or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void,
holding shall not affect the remaining portions of-- thi:
ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall b,
held to be inapplicable to any person, property or circumstances
such holding shall not affect its applicability to any othe:
person, property or circumstances.
F. APPLICABIL/T~ OF ORDiNANC;;.
This ordinance shall be applicable as" stated in
Paragraph A.
The Clerk be and hereby is directed forthwith to send a
certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Laws,
Department 'of State, The Capitol, Ta!!ahassee, Florida, 32304.
H. - '-'---:- --~ ' -'~ ~ "-' --:- ~--~ "- - ~'HIqUNI'/'y AFFAIR~.
The County Attorney shall send a certified copy of this
ordinance to the Department of Community Affairs, 2571 EXecutive
Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301.
5 2 S 5 3 0
I. ~FFECT IVE DATE.
This ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of
official acknowledgment from the Office of Secretary of State
that this-ordinance has been filed in that office.
After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was
as follows:
Chairman Jim Minix
Vice-Chairman Jack Krieger
Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner
Commissioner Havert L. Fenn
Aye
Aye
Aye
Commissioner Judy Culpepper Aye
PASSED AND DUL~ ADOPTED this ISth day of December, 1986.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNT~ COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNT~, FLORIDA
$00527
0526 I "[2531
'87 J,,r..ll'~ -5 Ft2:44
FILE.:, .... ~ .. { ~J ,//
ST. LUC, i~ "- Dt "" ":
soz, o'rzo ee-28e /
~~, the Board of County Co~issioners of St. LUc.e
County, Florida, has made the fOllowin9 determinations:
1. Minton Sun, Inc. and Indianola Groves (No. 3), a Florid~
Partnership Presented a ~tition for a chan9e in zonin9 from ~_
(Agriculture' Residential- 1 du/ac) to ~ (Industrial, Light
for ~e Property described below.
2. The St.. Lucia Cowry Plannin9 and Zonin9 C°~iSSion,
held a public .hearin9 on ~e ~tition, after PUblishin9 notice at
least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearin9 and notifyin9 by
mail ~ners of pro~rty within five hundred feet (500,) of the
subject pro~rty, and has reco~ended that the Board approve the
hereinafter described r~uest for Change in zonin9 Classification
from ~-1 (Agricultural' ReSidenti~ -1 du/ac) to IL (Industri~,
Light) for ~e ~titioned Property in its entirety.
3. On December 18, 1986, this Board held a PUblic hearin9
on the petition, ~ter PUblishin9 a notice of such hearin9 in the
Fort Pierce News Tribune on NOrther 25, 1986, and notifyin9 by
mail al! ~ners of Property within 500 feet of the subject
Pro~rty.
4. ~e pro, sed z°nin9 change, as ~ended, is COnsistent
with the St. LUCia County Growth ~nag~ent Poli~ Plan and has
satisfied the Standards of review set out in Section 5.3.300 of
the St. Lucia County ZOnin9 Ordinance.
·
Commissioners of St. Lucie
A.
IT ~SOLYED by
County, Florida:
loll ows:
the Board of Co unty
The Zoning Classification for that property described as
Prom the Southwest corner of Sect/on 36,
TOWnship 34 South, Range 39 East, run East 25
feet; Thence run North parallel With the West
rightline of of Section way line- 36, for 227.66 feet to the 'North
Point of beginning Canal C-25 for the
: Thence continue North
517.34 feet; thence run East Parallel with
the South line of Section ,
thence run South parallel 36 559.7 feet;
of Section 36, 517.46 feetwith the West line
to the North line
of Canal C-25; thence run West 559.7 feet to
the Point of beginning. (6.65A)
and
Sect/on 36, Township 34S, Range 39E - SW 1/4
of SW 1/4 - less N 517.34 feet of S 745 feet
of E 559.7 feet of W 584.7 feet & less SFWMD
& Roads (26.08 AC).
fromOwnedAR_lbY Minton Sun, Inc., be and the Same is hereby· Changed
(Agricultural, Residential -1 du/ac) to IL
Light).
B. The St. Lucie County Community Development
hereby authOrized and directed to Cause the changes to be made on
the Off/c/a/ Zoning Map of St. Lucie County· Florida, and to make
notationAfter of motion reference and to the date of adoption of this resolution.
f oll ows:
Second, the VOte on this
Chairman Jim Minix
Vice-Chairman Jack Krieger
CommiSsioner R. Dale Trefelner
Commissioner Havert L. Fenn
(Industrial,
Director is
resolution was as
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Commissioner Judy Culpepper
PA~$~D AND DUL~ ADOpTED this 18th
~ye
day of December, 1986.
BOARD OP COUNTy
ST. LOCIE ~U~, ~IDA
'90O.,33?,
FILE?.,.
ST. LUC;~, ,.:.:, _ .
~2:48
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSION£RS
January 16, 1987
DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATOR
J. GARY AMENT
Minton Sun, Inc. and
Indianola Groves (No. 3)
Florida Partnership
An§le Road and Kings Highway
P. O. Drawer 670
Fort Pierce, FL 33450
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that on Thursday, December 18, 1986, the Board
of County Commissioners granted your petition to amend the future
land use classification set forth in the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to IL (Industrial,
Road.Light) located on the northeast corner of Kings Highway and Angle
Ainformation.COpy of the recorded Ordinance No. 86-87 is enclosed for your
Sincerely, ~
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Jim Minix, Chairman
JM:sr
Enclosure
NAVERT L. FENN, District No. I · E. E. GREEN, District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER. District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5
County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS
2300 Virginia Avenue · For~ Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100
Coordinator: Ext. 398 · Building: Exl'. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317
ORDINANCE NO. 86-87
$00527
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY
GROIqTR MANAGEMENT POLICY PLAN, ORDINANCE
NO. 86-01 BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION'
OF THP. PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF KINGS HIGH~A¥ AND ANGLE ROAD (MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN) FROM SU (SE[II URBAN) TO IL
(INDUSTRIAL, LIGHT)~ MAKING FINDINGS~ PROVIDING
FOR MAKING THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON THE OFFICIAL
F'O%%NN%i?.~P_O_P- S~T. F-UCIE COUNT~. PROVIDING FOR h ~,~-'ZI~G PROVISIONS AND' SEVERABIF. .
IT~,
PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND
THE DRPARTMBNT OF COPd~UNIT¥ AFFAIRS AND FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE AND ADOPTION.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida, has made the following determinations:
1. Minton Sun, Inc. and Indianola Groves (No. 3), a Florida
Partnerhsip presented a petition to amend the future land use
classification set forth in the St. Lucie County Growt~
Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to IL -(Industrial,
Light) for the property described .below.
2. The St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency, after
holding a public hearing on December 10, 1986 of which due notice
was published at least seven (7) days prior to said hearing and
!
all owners of property within five hundred feet- (500) wer~
notified by mail of said hearing, has recommended that the Board
· .amend the future land use classification set forth in the St.
Lucie County 'GrOwth Management Plan from SU
(Industrial, Light) for the petitioned property in its entirety..
3. The Board held a public hearing on December 18, 1986,
after~ pUblishing a notice:of .sUCh. hearing in the Fort Pierce News
Tribune on December 9 and DeCember 10, 1986.'
5 2 G5 2'8
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of
Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida:
A.
The future l~and use classification set forth in
GrOwth Management Policy Plan for that
described as follows:
county
right of way line for Canal C-25 for the
point of beginning: Thence continue North
517.34 feet; thence run East parallel with
the South line of Section 36, 559,7 feet;
thence run South parallel with the West line
of Section 36, 517.46 feet to the North line
of Canal C-25; thence run West 559.7 feet to
the .point of beginning. (6.65A)
and
Section 36, Township 34S, Range 39E - SW 1/4
of SW 1/4 - less N 517.34 feet of S 745 feet
of E 559.7 feet of W 584.7 feet & less SFWMD
& Roads (26,08 AC). -
oWned by M/nton Sun, Inc., be, and the same is hereby Changed
from SU (Semi Urban) to IL (Industrial, Light).
B. FINDING OF CONSISTENCy,
This Board specifically determines that the approved
change in future land use plan is consistent with the policies
and obi ectives contained in the St.. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan.
The St. Lucie County Community DeVelopment Director is
hereby authorized and' directed to cause the .changes to be made on
· the Official Zoning Map of St. Luci.e CoUnty, Florida, and to make
notation of reference to the date of adOption of this ordinance.
D. CONFLICTING PROVIS ION.~.
Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only
to unincorporated areas, of St. Lucie County, County ordinances
and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this
ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent
of such conflict.
If any portiOn of this ordinance is for any reason held
or unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such
not affect the remaining portions of this
ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be
hel:d to be inapplicable to any person, property or circumstances,
such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other
person, property or circumstances.
F. APPLIC-A~ILIT¥ OF ORDINANCR.
This ordinance shall be applicable as-' stated in
Paragraph A.
The Clerk be and hereby is directed forthwith to send a
certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Laws,
Department of State, The Capitol, Ta!lahassee, Florida, ~32304.
The~ County Attorney shall send a certified copy of this
of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive
Center CirCle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301.
I. F-~FFEC~ IVE DA~'~,.
This :ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of
official acknowledgment from the Office of Secretary of State
that this ordinance has been filed in that office.
After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was
as follows:
Chairman Jim Minix
Vice-Chairman Jack Krieger
COmmissioner R. Dale Trefelner
COmmissioner Ravert L,' Penn
Aye
Aye
Alre
Aye
Commissioner Judy Culpepper Aye
PASMED AND DIIL][ ADOPTED this 18th day of December, 1986.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COU1F/-f COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
FOR~ ,AND
8003Z?
'87 J,~.N '"'5 F~
· 2:44
ST. LtJCi~. C~b:" ', ~''
SU
~L
BLUE
REEN
A
~? A,~E~T: ~O~ERT LLOYD
TO. CH~,N:~E FUTURE L~D USE CLAS~SIF]CAT]~ii
AR~I
AG
IL
BLUE
GREEN
RED
A
PETITION OF MINTON SUN~ INC & INDIANOLA a~OVES(NO, 3)
~Y AGENT: ROBERT LLOYD
TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
Ff~el~SU TO IL
BOARD O__F ~OUNT¥ CON)IZSSIONERS
- ~ S.~._.T~ LUCI~ CoUNYy~ FLORIDA
_SPECIAL MEETING
Date: December 18, 1986 --~-'---
Tapes: #1 - #3 convened: 7:15 p.m.
adjourned: 12:00 a.m.
Commissioners Present: Chairman Jim Minix, Vice Chairman Jack
Krieger, Havert L. Fenn, Judy Cqlpepper' R. Dale Trefelner
(Com. Culpepper was absent duri6g'discussion/vote on items 1
through 5 but thereafter participated in the meeting. Com. Fenn
was absent during discussion/vote on item 1 but thereafter parti-
cipated in the meeting.
Others Present: Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney, j. Gary Ament,
Community Development Coordinator, Gary Schindler, Planning
Administrator, Theresse du Bouchet, Deputy CIerk
19. PETITION O~FHINTON..SUN IN,
~N ~~ ~ AND INO
~AND US ~ IANOLA
Attorney Robert LlOyd appeared before the Board on behalf of h's
client to request Board approval of the proposed change ~n
zoning.
Based on the recommendations of the Local Planning Agency and of
Staff, it ~as moved by Com. CUlpepper, seconded by Com. Kriege~,
to adopt Ordinance No. 86-87, as amended to include the entire
legal description included in the petition, ~hich ordinance
amends the'st. Lucie County G'ro~th Management Policy Plan, Ordi-
nance No. 86-01 by changing the land use designation of ~he
property located at the northeast corner of Kings High~ay and
AngIe Road from SU to IL; making findings; PrOviding for making
the necessary changes on the official zoning map of St Lucie
County; and, upon tel1 call, motion unanimously ~~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
County Administrator
County Commission
FROM:
DATE.:
Planning Administrator/~
December 15,:1986
SUBOECT:
Petition of Minton Sun Inc. and Indianola
Groves (No 3) a Florida Partnership (by agent
Robert M. Lloyd) to amend the Future Land Use
Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management
Policy Plan from SU (semi .Urban) to IL
Industrial Light)
On Thursday, December 18, 1986, you will be asked to review
a petition on behalf of Minton Sun Inc., and Indianola Groves to
amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan from SU to IL. This petition was
presented to the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency for
review on December lO, 1986, at which time, this Agency voted 5
to O.to recommend approval o~this petition. In offering this
recommendation of approval, this Agency determined that the pro-
posed petition is consistent with the Policies and Objectives of
the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan.
As required under Chapter 16~, Florida Statutes, County
Staff has transmitted this amendment request 'to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs for interagency review. In com-
ments received back from the Department, no specific reference to
this petition was made. On September 22, 1986, the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council reported that this proposed amendment
did not conflict with any regional plan or policy.
Attached for your review is a copy of the original staff
comments on this petition, transmitted to you on August l, 1986,
and the most recent memorandum transmitted to the St. Lucie
County Local Planning Agency on December 2, 1986. By separate
memorandum, the County Attorney's Office will be providing a
Draft Ordinance granting partial approval to this ~etition.
December 15, 1986
Page 2
Petition: Minton Sun
If you have any questions on this petition, please let me
know.
GMS/DSM/mg
MINTON2(B3)
cc: County Attorney
Robert M. Lloyd
Commission Secretary
Press/Public
2
FFom the Sou~lt~.8~' cogne= o£ Se¢~Xon 36,. ?ownshXp 34 5outh, ~nge
3g ~as~, =~ ~' 25 ~eo~; ~nce ~n NO=Ch P~allel ~X~h CAe
1~o o~ Section 36, 227.66 gee~ ~o the NoF~h =lgh~ o~ we~ 1~
~6, 559.7 ree~r c~ .... .~h ~e o~ bct~on
~e n~ ~ South ~a~e~ v~th the ~
ct~o~ 36~ S~7.46 ~eoC . e8~ ~ne
559_7 ~eet to the ~c -' ~ ........... ; t~ ....
~eet o~ S 745 ~eot o~ E 559.7 ~eet o~ ~ 584 7 ~eet &.Aeso
G R~8 (26.08 AC) *
AGENDA - BOAHD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
T~3RSDAY
DECEMBER 18, 1986
7;00 P.M.
Petition of Minton Sun, Inc. and Indianola Groves (No. 3) a Flori~
Partnership, by Agent= Robert Lloyd, to amend the Future Land Use Clas-.
sification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from
[Semi Urban] to IL [Light Industrial Development] for the following
described property~
(S~E ATTACHED LEGA~ DESCRIPTION)
[Location= Northeast corner of Kings Highway and Angle Road.)
Prior to this public hearing,, notice of the same was sent to all
adjacent property ownerS.~
If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued
Please note that all proceedings before-the Board of County Commie
sioners are electronically recorded. AnY person who decides to a~eal
any action taken by the Board of County Commissioners at this meeting
will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made.
BOARD OF COUntY coMMIssiONB~S
ST. LUCZE COUNTY, FLOHIDA
/s/ J~mM~x, Chairman
SU BLUE
IL GREEN
N
~$-54-,..%.9
A
PETITION OF MINTON SUN, INC. & INDIANOLA GROVES
1)¥ AGENT: ROBERT LLOYD
'1'0 CHANGE ZONING I)ISTRICT CLASSIFICATION ..
FROFI AR-1 TO IL
AR- 1
AG
iL
BLUE
GREEN
RED
A
CANAL
N
,36-54-3S
PETITION OF HINTON SUN, INC. & INI)IANOLA GROVES (NO.))
BY AGENT: ROBERT LI. OYI)
TO CHANGE ZONING I)ISTRICT CLASSIFICATION
FROH AR-.! TO !L
AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COI~f]'SS]'ONERS
'Iq~URSDA¥
DECF, HBER 18, 1986
7:0(~ P.M..
Petition of Minton Sun, Inc. and Indianola Groves (No. 3) a Florid
P.artnership, by Agent: Robert Lloyd, to amend the Future Land Use Clas-
(semi Urban) to IL (Light Industrial DevelOpment ) for the following
described property: .....
(SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRZPTION)
(Location: Northeast corner of Kings Highway and Angle Road.)
Prior'to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all
adjacent property owners.
If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued
from t/me: to t/me
Please note that ell proceedings before .the Board of County CommXs,
sioners are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal
any action taken by the Board of County Commissioners at this meeting
will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to
ensure that a verbat/m record of the proceedings is made.
BOARD OF COUNTY CONMZSSIONERS
ST. LUCZE COUNTY, FLORZDA
dcm
/s/ J/m Minix, Cha/rman
Robert Lloyd
P.O. Box 1270
~c. Pierce, Fl. 33454
·
A
lndianola Grovee, No. 3
P.O. Box 670
FO. Pierce, Pl. 33454
Parcel 2
Harie B· Reld-
'2195 Kings- Hwy.
[.iii ?,.
S. Florida ~acer~c.Dtsc.
Re. 3, BSx'I375
FC..Pierce., Fl. 33451
.OTHER PROPERTY
A
Ktncou Sun, Inc.
P.O. Box 670
Ft. P~erce, Fl. 33.454
Parcel 3
Vernon D. Smith, eC al.
c/o Ch°is°aT iClo
P.O. Box 1152 -
StUart, Fl.-33495
Parcel 7
Hell/man Grove, Inc.
712 ~. 25th St.
S~0~d,.Fl, 32771'
Par°el 9' '--parcel 10'
Cour~ney p. Stephens, eC al.. ',.Philip C. ~aCe8, ec al.
RC. 2 P.O. Box 730
Bomm, 11. 62316 .. FO. P~erce, Fl. 33454
Parcel 15
~rYA,- Level1, ec aX.
P.O. Box
Fl:. P~erce,.F1. 33450
ParCel I
Janec K. .eC
AZcoaonte Springs, Fl. 32;
Parcel'8
Ray & Dorio'~o~en
JasPeT4 Fl. 32052
PareeX 11
"' Larry L. P, clver
3120 l~__raviLta Blvd.
FO. P/ere, e, Fl. 33~82
Pa~el 16
3345'0
FareaX 18
Robere &LoLe quick
811Dunad Ave.
Cpa Loch, Fl. 33054
Far°ax 19
~alCer & Gloria SeoCc
8533Laurence
BoynConBch., ~ 33436
C~ua!
131~ N. 2nd Sc.
Pt. P~erce, P~. 33A50
CounCy Road
St. Lucia County Admtn. Bldg.
Read Right-of-Way, Itu. 208A ,
2300 Virginia Ave.
FC. Pierce, Fl. 33682
State Ro&ds
St. of FlortdaRoad Dept.
Road Right-of-Way
780 S.W. 2~th Sc.
FC..Lauderdale, Fl. 33313
m
2571
BOB GRAHAM
Governor
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
November 12, 1986
32399
TOM LEWIS, JR.
Secretary
The Hgnorable Havert L. Fenn
Chairman
St. Lucie County Board of
Commissioners
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, Florida 33482-5652
OECti
O£VE O M
ENT COORDINATOR
ST. LUCIE CO.,' FL
Dear Commissioner Fenn:
Pursuant to section 163.3184, 'Florida Statutes, the 'Department
of Community Affairs has conducte~ a review of the proposed amend-
ments to the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan.
Our review indicated that the August 11, 1986, proposed plan
amendments were generally-consistent with the statutory requirements
except as noted in the attached comments. The Department believes
the County should continue to monitor the cumulafive impact of such
plan amendments to ensure the internal consistency of the adopted
Growth Management Policy Plan pursuant to s.163.3177(2), Florida
Statutes. Additional comments from the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council and the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners.have been attached for your review and possible use
during the comprehensive plan amendment process.
Once the adoption process is complete, the Department
requests a copy of the amended comprehensive plan as required by
s.163.3187(3), Florida Statutes.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT - HOUSING AND COMMUNITY Dr~'FLOPMENT · RESOURCE PLANNiN~
kL. ~l~ MANAGEMENT
Mr. Havert L. Fenn
November 12, 1986
Page Two
Please contact Mr. Lenwood Herron at 904/487-4545 if we can
be of further assistance regarding these comments.
RFK/lhr
Sincerely,
.~-~.. l /A~',. ;..
Robert F. Kessler, Chief
Bureau of Local Resource
Planning
Enclosures
cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENTS
TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY GROWTH M~NAGEMENT POLICY PLAN
Petition #6
The petition of William Carpenter to amend the Future Land Use
map from low residential to medium residential appears to be
inconsistent with the residential development and agricultural
development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on
pages 29 and 33.
Petition #7
The petition of Laura Hancock to amend the Future Land Use map
from medium residential to commercial general appears to be
inconsistent with the residential development policies of the
Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29.
Petition #8
The petition of Malcolm and Sylvia Collins to amend the'Future
Land Use map from medium residential to commercial general
appears to be inconsistent with the residential development
policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29.
Petition #10
The petition of Terrance Mack to amend the Future Land Use map
from low residential to commercial general appears to be
inconsistent..with the commercial development policies of the
Growth Management Policy Plan on page 30
Petition #12
The petition of Rose Baukmer to amend the Future Land Use map
from low residential and commercial general to light industrial
appears to he. inconsistent with the residential development and
industrial deyelopment policies of the Growth Management Policy
Plan on pages 29 and 32.
Petition #13
The petition of Potter and Cleghorn to amend the Future Land Use
map from low residential to commercial general appears to be
inconsistent with the residential development polities of the
Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29.
Petition #14
Local approval of the H. F. Mar=ek, Jr., project should be
deferred until specific impact issues have been sufficiently
resolved under the Development of Regional Impact Process
pursuant to section 380.06, Florida Statutes. It should be noted
that this project exceeds 80% of the 1,000 dwelling units thresh-
old for St. Lucie County. Therefore, the applicant should
contact the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Resource
Management for guidance on the DRI process.
Petition %17
The petition of the St. Lucie County Board of County
Commissioners to amend the Future Land Use map from light
industrial to medium residential appears to be inconsistent with
the residential development policies of the Growth Management
Policy Plan on page 29.
Petition #19
Local approval of the Minton..et al project should be deferred
until specific impact issues have been sufficiently resolved
under the Development of Regional Impact process pursuant to
section 380.06, Florida Statutes. The applicant should contact
the Department o~ Community Affairsl Bureau of Resource Manage-
ment for guidance on the DRI process.
Petition #20
The petition o,f Dorothy L. Foster to amend the Future Land Use
map from low residential ~o commercial general appears to be
inconsistent with the commercial development policies of the
Growth Management Policy Plan on page 30.
~etition #21
Local approval~ of the Strazzulla Brothers Company, Inc., and ,John
B. Culverhouse et al should be deferred until specific impact
issues have been sufficiently resolved under the Development of
Regional Impact process pursuant to section 380.06, Florida
~tatutes..The applicant should contact the Department of
Community Affairs, Bureau of Resource Management for guidance on
the DRI process.
2
September 23, 1986
Mr. Ralph K. Hook
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of Local Resmirce Planning
2571 Executive Center Circle, East
Tallahassee, FL 32301
Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Documents
Dear Mr. Hook:
.J
Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning
and Land Development~ Regulation Act,. Chapter~ 163, Florida Statutes,-the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council reviewed the amendments~to the St.
Lucie County land use element at its regular meeting on September' 22, 1986.
The following comments were approved by Council for transmittal to the
State Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Sections 163.3184(1)(c)
and (2), Florida Statutes, for consideration by the County prior to
adoption of the,document.
Evaluation
The proposed amendments to the Land Use Element have been reviewed in
accordance with the. requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes,
Council's review~procedures~, and Council's adopted plans and policies. The .
following comments are offered as a result of that r~view.
The proposed amendments are not in conflict or inconsistent with
adopted Council plans or policies. Proposals to convert large
tracts of agricultural lands to semi-urban uses (e.g., ~tem 20)
are of some concern, however, and should not be considered prior
to a comprehensive reevaluation of the County's goals and
objectives for the entire area (see attached letter).
Prior to the approval of the land use amendments, the proposed
changes should be tested aaainst the St. Lucie County
transportation model, to assure that the affected roadways can
accommodate the more intense land uses.
Council supports the efforts of St. Lucie County and the School
Board of St. Lucie County {see the attached letter) in improving
educational opportunities through the use of d:dications and
impact fees as discussed in the amendment request.
Mr. Ralph K. Hook
Page two
September 23, 1986
The property described by Item 1 is close to the sites of the
Treasure Coast Square Mall and the proposed Vista Plantation
development in Martin County. The ability of U.S. 1 to
accommodate additional traffic generated by Item 1 must be
ensured. Adequate right-of-way should be dedicated for future
expansion of the roadway network prior to the d~wlopment of this
parcel. - '
Considering the proximity of Item 16 to the St. Lucie County
Airport, the current land use designation of Liaht Industrial may
be more appropriate than the proposed Residential land use
designation. Consideration should be given tO-plans for future
expansion of the airport facilities and increased levels of air
traffic, as well as noise and safety issues
The property described by Item 18 contains many acres of
wetlands known as the Nor.~hern Savannas. Care should be taken
to minimize the impacts of any development on this
environmentally sensitive area.
The property d~scribed by Item 20 is located on the border of
Indian River~ County and is near the interface of the St. Johns
River Water Management District and South Florida Water
Management District. Since a development of such size in this
location may have far reaching impacts, it is recommended that
the land use amendment not be approved until both St. Lucie
County and Indian Rivet'County aqree that such an-action would
not adversely affect the ability of ~ither county to realize
growth management and planning objectives. A primary concern is
the relationship of the project with the existing
urban/agricultural boundary. Development of the property as
residential may create compatibility problems with existing
agricultural development. Prior to considerina any change in
land use, the County should carefuJly conside~ its long range
plans for this area, provision of infrastructure and services,
and the 'impacts of residential development on agricultural
activities in the area. Additionally, a project of the size of
this proposal would be a DRI. Final consideration of the
proposed land use change should, perhaps, wait until a report
and recommendations can be developed that evaluate regional
issues.
Mr. Ralph K. Hook
Page three
September 23, 1986
If you need additional
hesitate to call me.
Sincerely~ /
Dan)el M. Cary
Executive Director
DMC:lg
Attachments
information or have any questions, please do not
PROPOSED
LAND
USE
AMENDMENTS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY
ITEM ACRES
1 9.2
( 2 18.0
J 3 37.5
: 4 '3.0
: 7 0.9
10 30.5
12 O. 7
13 278.0
14 32.5
15 ~ 37,5
16 52.5
17 0.3
18 760.0
19 2.3
20 5,64 3.0
CURRENT DESIGNATION
PROPOSED DESIGNATIDN
Residential, Low
Residential, Low
Residential, Low
Residential, Low
Residential, Low
Residential, Medium
Residential, Medium
Commercial, General
-Residential, Low -
Semi -U rb an
Residential, Low
Commercial, General
Residential, Low
Agricultural, Productive
Semi-Urban
Semi-Urban
Industrial, Light
Residential, Low
Semi-Urban
Residential, Low
.Agricultural, Productive
Commercial, General
Commercial, General
Commercial, General
Commercial, General
ReSidential, Medium
Commercial, General
Commercial, General
Residential~ Medium
commercial, T6urist
Residential, Low
Industrial, Light
Commercial, General
Residential, Low
Industrial, Light
Industrial, Light
Res'idential, Medium
Residential, Medium
Industrial, Light
Commercial, General
Semi-Urban
B£ ~RD OF CO UNTY COMMISS! -~VERS
~840 25th Street. Vero Beach, Florida
Telephone. ($05) 567-8000
September 9, 1986
Mr. Peter G. Merri~t
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
620 South Dixie Highway
Stuart, FL 33495
RE:
Land Use Amendment for St. Lucie
County - Falcon Ridge
Dear Mr. Merritt:
Suncom Telephone: 424-1011
Indian River County staff has reviewed the petition of the
Strazzulla Brothers Company, Inc. and John B. Culverhouse eta[ to
amend the future land use maps of the St~ Lucie County--GrOwth---
Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural) to SU-(Semi-Urban)
for the above referenced project. At this time staff's comments
are as follows:
!)
The proposed project land use designation (SU Semi-Urban at
one unit per acre) is not compatible with Indian River
County's Land Use Plan (Agriculture at one unit per five
acres). The existing ~parcels in the surrounding area are
currently in agricultural produCtion. Until such time that
the necessary urban services become available and th~
surrounding area infills with urban
development, staff
believes that this project would create "leap-frog" develop-
ment and would be ~remature. - ..... ~
2) Staff has concerns regarding traffic impacts to local roads
entering into Indian River County that could result as the
project develops to its maximum buildout capacity.
Please be advised that the Board of County Commissioners has not
considered these comments, however, upon direction from the
Treasure Co&st Regional Planning Council, staff will present this
issue to the Board for their deliberation.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment and hope that our
concerns can be addressed in the applicant's response. If ~ou
have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact
me at 567-8000, ext. 247.
Sincerely,
ff.
Art Challacombe
Chief, Environmental Planning
cc: Rober~ Keating, AICP
Tommy Thomas
Jim Davis
Mike Orr
Mike Miller
Richard Shearer
Stan Boling
THURSDAY
AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 18, 1986
7:00 P.M.
Petition of Minton Sun, Inc. and Indianola Groves (No. 3) a Florida
Partnership, by Agent: Robert Lloyd, to amend the Future Land Use Clas-
sification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU
(Semi Urban) to IL (Light Industrial Development) for the following
described property:
Minton Sun, Inc.
From the Southwest corner of Section 36, To~lship 34 South, Range
~39 East, run East 25 feet: Thence run North parallel with the West
line of Section 3~, 227.66 feet to the North right of way line
.:~ox%.Canal C-25 for the point of beginning~ Thence continue North
36, 559.7 feet; t~nce ~un South p~allel with the West line o~
~ection 36, 5Z7.46 feet to the No;th ~ine of Cana~ C-25; thence
r~ West 559.7 feet to the point of beginning. (6.65A)
lndianola Groves (No. 3)
Section 36, To, ship 34S, Range 39E - SW% 0f SW% - less N 517.34
feet of S 7,4~ feet of E 559.7 feet of W 584.7 feet & less
_& Roads (26208AC)
(Location: Northeast corner of Kin~s Highway and ~le Road.)
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all
adjacent property owners.
If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued
from time to time.
Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Co, lis-
sioners are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appe~
any action taken by the Board of County Commissioners at this meetinc
will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
/s/ Jim Minix, Chairman
dcm
TH~ N~WS TmBU~
. efore the un · _
dames J ~ .dersz~ed auchoriC er
says that he/she :_ n K. LeClaJr wh
- McMHlenor YP sona~ya ea
. Kathlee . PP
Is Pu . , o on da
Paerce m St · ~Y newspa~er u ' Y
. Lucre C ? bhshed at
co et · , hat the at
PY advert~ . tached
sement b n~ n~*~
...................· .............. ~ ...............
' i'~wspaperintheissuesof
For~ Pierce. i~ said ~. Lucie Cou~&~: Flor da and Chat ch spaper pub~ shed
~Y and has been enro~ Y PU~Jhed in said Rt I . ~ said newspaoer
ceding' the'fi-Z- °~'~:ucie County F or'dj"?' mater at the pos~ ofetoL~' ~acn
turth ...... ~ZP?"I~cat .... f the a ttach~ l_~r a ~enod of one vea;'~ reft
~s ad~ertiSemen~ ~o~ .~g,~m'~s~°n or refund fo~t~~'s°n' nrta or CO~ora.
~wo~ to and sUbsc./~ ~,~.~cat~on m the sa d new : ~.e purpose of securi
This 1 7th _ / '
................ day of. Dec.
A O 1986 ......... '-LL/ '
~' Highway Ind ~ h
"~,~ ~ _e..~-- ~°m~m~. ? ' _"'id~ . ,~ ~ · N~rtheast eom .
De~ ~1), ~t~a~ ~W~e~T~d D~
THURSDAY,DECEMBER 18,' 1986
. ~ -L (~ O~ R~D m - '
~ Kin~ H~ ~ St. ~ 8~,
~. ~ ~ u.~. ~ ~ ~St. Lu~eoun~ *~
~~ ~ ~'-~ .... · . ~me~N~U.S.T,~~
' ~N ~ THE lO~ ~ ~____ ' e~~mm~me~
~0~" ~ ~-~u,,,y ~ Ma~t Pol~ ~n *
~o a~d ~ st ~ ~ COU.~ COmm~mN~ ; ~ Man~im ~ P~n.
COUN~ O~ S~.
Before the undersized auLho~ty perso~y appeare~
James J. McMillen or Kathleen K. LeClair, who on
says that he/she is Publisher, Publisher's Secretary
The News Tribune, a daily newspaper published at Forl
Pierce in St. Lucie County, Flo?ida; that the attachec
copy of advertisement, being a.. no t ~e ..........
in the ma~er of... ~a.~.d.. uae...c~nge. ........ ' ........
was published in said newspaper in the issues of.
~2/9/~ ........
Affiant ~rther says thaL th~ ~i~ News Tribune is a newspaper publlsh~ at
Fort Pierce. in said St. Lucie County. FIorlda and that ~he ~zd news a
day and has b~n ended a~s~L~""~ .... a~? o~. ~uc~e ~ounty. Florida. ~ch
Pierce in said St Luc - ~.~,a~ m~. mater a: the ~st office in Fort
~g the first pubhcat~on of the at~ch~ c ..... t-d-- -' P
advertisement ior ~blica:ion in the said news-a pu~ose of s~urlng
T~s' llth n~'
day
.... r.r / ~ ~ ( ~
....................
r~
NOTICE OF CHANGE
'
USE
Robert Lloyd
P.O. Box 1270
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33454
Indianola Groves, No. 3
P.O. Box 670
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33454
Parcel 2
Marie B. Reid
2195 Kin-gB-.Hwy'
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33451
Canal No. 25
S. Florida Water Mgmt.Dist
Rt. 3, Box 1375 '
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33451
Parcel 9
Courtney p. Stephens, et al.
Rt. 2
Bowen, Il. 62316
Parcels 12 & 13
Charles B.
p _ Gates, Jr.,et al
,.u. Box 730 '--- ·
F~. Pierce, Fl. 33454
PROPERTY OWNERS IN PETITIONED AREA
OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIEp
Minton Sun, Inc.
P.O. Box 670
Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33454
Parcel 3
Vernon D. Smith, et al.
c/o Chelsea Title
P.O. Box 1152
Stuart, Fl. 33495
Parcel
Janet K. Knudsen
900 Lake Marion D]
Altomonte Springs
Parcels 4 & 5
Jim G. Russakis, e
Rt. 5, Box 448
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 334
et al.
Fl. 32701
al.
51
Parcel 7
Holliman Grove, Inc.
712 W. 25th St.
Sanford, Fl. 32771
Parcel 8
Ray & Dori~ ~ogan
P.O. Bo~r 1125
Jasp~, Fl. 32052
Parcel 10
Philip C. Gates, et al
P.O. Box 730 '
Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33454
Parcel 11
Larry L. MCIver
3120 Maravilla Blvd.
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482
Parcel 15
Mary A. Lovell, et al
P.O. Box 164 '
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33450
Parcel 16
Lorne NichoIson
6911Shannom Rd.
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33450
Parcel 18
Robert & Lois Quick
811Dunad Ave.
Opa Locka, FI. 33054
Parcel 19
Walter & Gloria Scott
8535 Lawrence Rd.
Boynton Bcb., Fl. 33436
Canal
F. P.F.W.M.D.
131½ N. 2nd St.
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33450
County Road
St. Lucie County Admin. Bldg.
Road Right-of-Way, Rm. 208A
2300 Virginia Ave.
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482
State Roads
St. of Florida Road Dept.
Road Right'of-Way
780 S.W. 24th St.
Ft. Lauderdale, F~. 33315
BOARD OF COUNT
COMMI$51ON i{$ Y
Dece~be~
D V LOPM NT
COo
_'~ui~O~_ ~u~ a~e ~ e P~ov~-. ' GARY ~ENT
the F,~ ~Ve Pet~= ~o. 3) = ~Sed th~ ~e St .
MRna ~Ure La ~ClOned ~ ~'lOrid~'~~c Mintn~ ~Ucie Cn
~. _the South..' llowin~ _, ban) t~ -. ~e Cou~ o a~end
~,.~'~ c-2~'~~6, ~Z7~Z ~nen,~e ~u~ 3~, ~o~en .
'.7 fee.~e~ce ~un~t of ~e North~llel
~.?Ction begin ~i ~cn,~ ~n e
' I ' ' ~e
-~c to t~i cae Nc ~lel ~t.~
,l~e 0-~a the ~
of st 1' ' ~ect/
bel ~ ~e o~ 'o~
Iadiaa°la GrOVes (No 3
~Ctzon 36, ~O~sh - )
feet of S
& 74
~'he B~- ~st d6~- '' ~eet ~ 'rs ~ 517 ..
t=. u~d 0~ ~ue~ of : ~ess S~f_t~ .
~s Petit~r Count~, ~ Kings H~~ '
Ave~..~u~, St U~ /:00 p ~°~Oner~ . = ~na
~._,,ue, For~'-~Ucie ~_ '~- on m~ W~ll h~= "~e Roe
=~ven an o~ Pierce ~nty Ad~u~Sdav j~u a Pub~ ~ . d. )
~ at tha~red Per'~i z300
~ ~me' oons w'~ll ~z'gzniaoe
Please not
Co~issi~_e that aT~
~eCo~d~~Jers OF o'~~
~ BOard ~Y Pers~UCie Co,~ Oefor~
This nOtic . ~c hear~uceedi~_ ,,,qy nee-- ~ a
should h- e~" beingtque~ ~ngs ~ay js_ is mad~u to_
Ode 305 _s, addi~.adjacen~
Sincerely · ~66_ll~C~ona1 ~ ~ prOper~
obtained
by
RT [. ~NN, Dis~i~ , eE E. GREEN, Dis~ict No ~ e
°rdino,or. r~. i!000 Virgini0 ,.__ ~un~Z?E~a mi .
~ · Plo,-:-~ ., ,,ng: Ext.~ ~4~2'R~"~uo~ ~ ~. .... NER, Distri~ No -
.... ~ ...... ~: ext. 006 · Code°' f ~ O0 .5
Enforcem
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
LOCAL PLANNING AGENcy
~ST. LUCIE COUNTy, FLORIDA
MINUTEs
MEETING OF DECEMBER 10, 1986
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman j. p.. Terpening, j. J. Sciturro,
Robert Carman, Mabel Fawsett, Patri~ia Ferrick, Patricia King.
BOARD[all absencesMEMBERS WereABSENT:excused).PeggY Harris, Mabel Fawsett, William:MYers'
OTHERS PRESENT: Daniel McIntyre County Attl Dennis Murphy,
Planner; Gary Schindler Planning Ad~nstrator;
Secretary. , ·
. s Messer,
TAPE(S}. 1, 2, 3, 4 DATE OF HEARING: 12/10/86 PAGE: 1
PUBLIcINVOCATIoN:HEARiNG:The Invocation Was given by Joseph ScitUrro'
Petition
of
Minton
SUn, Inc. and I
Florida Parteners ·
~U~ure Land U .... hip (by Agent ~dlanola Gro~,~o ,,..
on the ~ ..... om SU (Sem~ ,,-,_ -.Lucxe Cou ~ ) t°iamend
"~neast c .... - uz-oan) to ~r ,~nty Growth i~-- the
~er of K~n ..... ~ ~xndust · ?"~fagement
-.-u~ nl rial Li
gnway and Angle Ri gOt) located
oa~.
Attorney Robert M. Lloyd, represent
incorporated his c
further re~_~ ~ Omments ~=~ lng the ~.
HOUse ~u=e~ that t i .... u~ at the Jul =~zu~oners,
_ · and has b .h s property, ~_ .. Y 23, 19 _ .
years Th .... ~en U~ilize~ __ ~ ~ ~ne Min~^- ~6 hearth
~S~c~n~orming, of~? ~se Plan eff~n~ house loan_Packing
~ ~ = uUildin~ ~_~cn they we~ _~u~Veiy made ~ ~i number of
iOcat = P=rmit fo ~= not aw =his pro
_ ed on abo,,~ ~ r exDan~_ are unto) ~ Perry
grov~ ~. ~ - a~ ~ --~u~. ~_ ~ ~ne~
_ ~- rne bal~__ ~-~, and th~ ~ . ~*~u packin~ ~_ = ~piled
~rea ..... ~ce of ~ _ "= oa±anc · _ ~ ~OUse i
d~__ f~ urUC~s th=~ -- t**e grOVe ar~ · e is USe~ a~
~uposition ~ ~_~ ueliver ~,,~ =u is now n '~_:~ C~Erus
out tha~ __ -~ =~r±uent =_ _ f~=~t, and a~_ ee~ed us a
th~ . ~ ~cross th~ -~- =° required h,, ~ou needed ~ ~ng
._~ was zon~ ~ - o~reet f~ ~ ~ m~. ~ ~
Weldin~ ~3TMz~, and on ~i .... une Prone~ ?= ~urther DO~n~
h~ =re not awar~-~=~ an existin ~ acre Parcel
OpPosition- ~ ~ any surroundS_IL, HOgan,s
~ag PrOperty
There was no one else
to the Petition· Wishing to Speak in favor or in Opposition
Mr. Carman requested to see where on the prOperty the packing
house exists· Mr. Lloyd exhibited the lOcation.for the Board
Mr' Sciturro expressed his .
USes, the Property Opinion that Considering SUrrounding
Semi Urban. in question should not have been designated
Chairman Terpening then ClOsed the Publl
~mMu~phy, repres .... portion o
c
~',,,ents from t~uulng.staff, r^~__ . f the hearin .
3enerally ConsisLf~Pt- of Commun~ate~ that there - g
uoast Re~- ~ ~'~ With ~_~ . ~Y Affair~ .... ~ere no
· ~onal p . ouuUUtor . ~ uuner t ·
dmd not a .... lann~ng C ....... Y requ~rem .... hen ~t
.~r~ Ori~~ conflict w~ uun~ that t _ '~= Treasure
=~"uxmY recOmm n~~ any COUnc'. he Proposed
e"~=u a~a~n-~ - ll Plan6 ~- ~amendmeDt -
- -~°~ all OtheC .~_u~ POiicie~
~ IndUStrial zonings
· n this area, and
"~ meet the ind~m~__~n~s against this
_~ ocltUrro ma~_ zequiremen~ --.=t
~P 'oval de~_ y=.a motion ~ - . ..~s.
mug Second~nmng that i~n~ ~:.P~tition be.~ _
Sly Voted ~n~ motion, an~ .._~unsXStent w~h.~ecommended
C__~¥ rne Boar~ ~2 one mOtion '~' 2~uazz, the ~=L~' Mrs.
~proval ~ - ~ ~ou~t~"~__vf zne Pet' · -~u Unani_
~=[ermin~n~ ~,.~ ~ ~ummlSS~A .... ltlon wi~
AGENDA - LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
WEDNESDAY
DECEMBER 10, 1986
7:00 P.M.
Petition of Minton Sun, Inc. and Indianola Groves (No. 3) a
Florida Partnership, by Agent: Robert Lloyd to amend the Future
Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management
Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to IL (Light Industrial
ment) for the following described property:
Minton Sun, Inc.
From the Southwest corner of Section 36, Township 34 South
39 East, run East 25 feet; Thence run North parallel with t
line of Section 36, 227.66 feet to the North right of way li
for Canal C-25 for the point of beginning: Thence continue
517.34 feet; thence run East parallel with the South line of
36, 559.7 feet; thence run South parallel with the West line
Section 36, 517.46 feet to the North line of Canal C-25; then~
run West 559.7 feet to the point of beginning. (6.65A)
Indianola Groves (No. 3)
SectiOn 36, Township 34S, Range 39E - SW% of SW% - less N 517 34
feet of S ~45 feet of E 559.7 feet of W 584 7 feet & less SFWMD
& Roads (26208 AC) · '
(Location: Northeast corner of Kings Highway and Angle Road.)
Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning
Agency are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to
appeal any action taken by the Local Planning Agency at this
meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro-
ceedings is made.
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to
all adjacent property owners.
dcm
.copy of a,
~n the ma
copy
in the
............ ;8S~e$ of ....
BOARD OF COUNTY D VCLOPMCNT
COMMISSION£RS COORDi NE TOR
November 17, 1986 J. GA~
In
compliance with the provisions of Florida Statutes, you are hereby
advised that Minton Sun, Inc. and Indianola Groves (No. 3) a Florida
Partnership, by Agent: Robert Lloyd, have petitioned the Local Plan-
n±nD Agency to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St.
Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to IL
(Light Industrial Development) for the followin~ described property:
Minto~ Sun, inc.
From the Southwest corner of Section 36, Townshi~ 34 South, Range
39 East, run East 25 feet; Thence run North parallel with the West
line of Section 36, 227.66 feet to the North right of way line
for Canal C-25 for the ~oint of beginning= Thence continue North
517.34 feet; thence run East Darallel with the South line of Section
36, 559.7 feet; thence run South Parallel with the West line of
Section 36, 517.46 feet to the North line of Canal C-25; thence
run West 559.7 feet to the point of beginning. (6.65A)
Zndianola Groves (No. 3)
ection 36, Township 34S
eet of S ~' · Range 39E -
~5 feet of E 5 SW~ of SW% -
& Roads (26~08 Am~ 59.7 feet of W 58~ - ~- - less N 517.34
(Location: NorthCa!st ~o ~ ........ -- ree~ & less SFWMD
rner of Kings Highway and Angle Road.)
A public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M. on Wednes-
day, December 10, 1986, in Room 101, St. Lucie County Administration
Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested
persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time.
Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are
electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action
taken by the Local Planning Agency at this meeting will need a record
of the proceedings and for Such pUrpose may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the Proceedings is made.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel,
please forward this notice to the new owner. If you have any ques-
tions, additional information may be obtained by callin~ Area Code
305, 466-1100, Extension 359.
Sincerely,
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
J' P- Terpening, ~hairman
dcm
HAVERT
L
FENN.
D~str~ct
No.
E.
E.
GREEN, District Ne.county2 ® JACKAdministrarorKRIEGER, District_ WELDoNN°' B.3 LEWIS · R. D,~.E TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100
Coordinator: Ext. 398 · Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 3t6 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 3~ 7
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
F rom:
Council Members
Staff
ITE 7-G
Date:
Subject:
September 22, 1986 Council Meeting
Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review -
Amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Use
Element
Introduction
Pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning
and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, tile
Council must" be provided an opportunity to review and comment on plan
amenclments prior to their acloption. St. Lucie County has' submitted
proposed land use amendments to the State Department of Community Affairs
which in turn is seeking Counci),s comments. ,
~Sack ground
St. Lucie County is considering 20 amendment~s to the Future Land Use Map.
Locations of the properties under consideration are shown on the accom-
panying map, and the number of acres and proposed changes in land use
designations are summarized in the attached list.
The County is also considering text amenoments that would 1) add language
describing plans for new residential development
to bear a portion ofT
educational costs through developer dedications and impact fees, 2) delete
the requirement for site development plans with all rezoning petitions, and
3) require a site development or concept plan for proposals to amend the
Future Land Use Maps of the Growth Management Policy Plan {i.e the
Comprehensive Plan). .,
Evaluation
The proposed amendments to the Land Use E]
~accordance with the re-uir ........ ?merit have been reviewed in
........ , . , =,,~-~s o.r Chapter 163, Florida Statutes
~uu, clls review procedures, and Council's ~ ,
follow~ng co~en:s are off ~, .......... ~d~ptyd plans and policies. The
er.~ ~ ~ r~su~ or ~na: review.
The proposed ~endments are not in conflict or inconsistent with
adopted council plans or policies. Proposals to convert large
tracts of agricultural lmmds to simi urban
ar - uses (e.g., Itm 20)
e of some concern, however, and should not be considered
to a comprehensi've re-evaluation of the , 'prior
ject~ves for the entire area. . county s goals and
Prior to the approval of the land use amendments, the proposed
changes should be tested against the St. Lucie County
transportation modP) to assure that the affected roadways can
.accommodate the more intense land uses.
Council supports the efforts of St. 'tucie County and the School
Board of St. Lucie County (see the attached letter) in improving
educational opportunities through the use of dedications and
impact fees as discussed in the amendment request.
The property described by Item 1 ~s close to the sites of the
Treasure Coast Square Mall and the proposed Vista Plantatio6
development in Martin County. The ability of U.S. 1 to
accommodate additional traffic geflerated by Item i must be
ensured. Adequate right-of-way should be dedicated for future
expansion of the roadway network prior to the development of this
parcel.
Considering the proximity of .tem~.~,,.~j.,to the St. Lucie County
Airport, the current land use designation of Light Indust:rial may
be more appropriate than the proposed residential land use
designation. Consideration should be given to plans for future
expansion of the airport faci.lities and increased levels of air
traffic, as well as noise and safety issues.
The property described by Item 18 contains many acres of
wetlands known as ,the Northerh Savannas. Care should be taken
to mi~)imize the impacts of any ,~ development on this
environmerltally sensitive area.
The property described by Item 20 is located on the border of
Indian River County and is near the interface of the St. Johns
River Water Management District and South Florida Water
Management District. Since a development of such size in this
location may'have far reaching impacts, it is recommended that
the land use amendment not be approved until both St. Lucie
County and Indian River County agree that such an action would
not adversely affect the ability of either cc~unty to realize
growth management and planning objectives. A primary concern is
the relationship of the project with the istin~
ur dan/agr icu 1 tufa l ex
boundary. Development of the property as
residential may create compatibility problems with ex~sting~
agricultural development. Prior to considering any change in
land use, the County
sl~ould carefully consider its long )ran e
plans for this area, provision of infrastruct ........ g
and the impacts of residential development on agriculltura
~uru and services
activities in the area. Addi:iona)ly, a project of the size of
this proposal would be a D.R.I. Final consideration o~ the
proposea land use change should, perhaps, wait until a r~port
and reco~,)nendations can be developed that evaluate regional
issues.
Recommenoati on
Council should adopt the comment~ outlined
Use Element and approve their transmittal
Community Affairs in fulfillment of the
Florida Statutes.
Attachments
above with respect to the Land
to the State Department ~f
requirements of Chapter 163,
-,'_j
September 3, 1986
Mr. Peter G. Merritt
Regional P]ann~.r
620 South Dixie Highway
P.O. Drawer 396
Stuart, FL 33495-0396
Dear Mr'. Merritt:
Subject: Your letter dated 8-26-86--Local Government Ccmprehensive
.. P1an .
I aSsK~T~ the amendment to the Land Use Plan for Saint Luc'ie County
m~ntioned in your letter is the School Board Impact Fee. If this is
th case~ let me assure you that such a fee is vitally necessary in
order for~--the School Board to have the necessary funds to construct
new facilities. Currently, the pop,~l~tion growth is exceeding the
County's ability to provide capital funds. Although the proposed
impact fee will not solve the problem, it will be a great help.
Dr. George R. Hill, Superintendent, and the Board urges you and otb~_r
agencies to look with favor on th~ proposed amendmant.
please do not hesitate
If this office can~ any assistance to you,
to contact --~a~~-5031.
b
cc: Dr. George
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSION(ERS
Via Federal Express
August 11, 1986
'i
:i
Mr. Oames Hurley, Director
Division of Resource Planning and Management
Department of Community Affairs
2571 Executive Center Circle East
Tallahassee, FL ~2301
Subject:
Transmittal of Proposed Amendment to the St. Lucie County
Growth Hanagement Policy Plan
Dear Hr. Hurley:
Enclosed you will find, for review by the State Land Planning'
Agency, ten copies of 22 proposed amendments to the St. Lucie ~ounty
Growth Nanagement Policy Plan.' The amendments are being transmitted
to you pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163.D184 (3) Fliorida
Statute. .....
On Thursday, June 24, 1986, t'he St. Lucie County Local Plainning
Agency held a public hearing on Petitions Number 7, 12, and17 'Of the
attached agenda. These hearings were held in accordance to statutory
requirements in effect prior to Ouly l, 1986. On August 7, 198~, the
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners certified that the
Local Planning Agency did in fact hold this heari'ng.
On Thursday, August 7, 1986, the St. Lucie CountY Board of (:ounty
Commissioners held a public hearing pursuant to Chapter 163.JlBz~f(15)
Florida Statute, for the purpose of transmitting the balance o the
attached agenda to the State Land Planning Agency for review. These
amendments are scheduled to be presented to the St. Luc~ie County LoCal
Planning Agency and Board of County Commissioners for :"inal
disposition in December of 1986. This will complete the second Plan
Amendment cycle for 1986, as permitted under Florida Statute and the
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners-amendment schedules.
If, in reviewing this material, you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Mr. Gary Schindler, Pla ning
HAVERT L. FENN, Distric: No. I · E. E. GREEN. Dis:der No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER. Distdc: No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, Distric: No. 4 · JIM MINI,~ Distdc: No. 5
County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS
2300 Virginia Avenue * Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 * Phone (305) 466-1100 Ext. 201 & 202
Mr. Murley
August 11, 1986
Administrator or Mr. Daniel S. Mc Intyre, County Attorney at 305~466-
llO0. I appreciate your Department's offer of timely consideration
of these petitions, as indicated by legal counsel Rhoda R. GlascO, '
her letter of Ouly 24, 1986 to our County Attorney. Any comments that
you propose to return should be received by St. Lucia County no later
than November 14, 1986, in order to
meet the December, 1986 hearing
dates. When corresponding with St. Lucia County, I would appreciate
it if you would please copy Mr~~ Schindler and Mr. Mc Intyre at this
same address. Thank you for your time and efforts.
Sincerely,
~~ix, Vice Chairman'
d of County Commissioners
OM/DSM/lg
cc'
County Administrator
County Attorney
Development Coordinator
Planning Administrator
Ralph Hook
Petition Files
AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THURSDAY
AUGUST 7, 1986
5:30 P.M.
Petition of Minton Sun, Inc. and Indianola Groves (No. 3)
a Florida Partnership, by Agent: Robert Lloyd, to amend the Future
Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management
Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to IL (Light Industrial Development)
for the following described property:
Minton Sun, Inc.
From the Southwest corner of Section 36, Township 34 South, Range
39 East, run East 25 feet; Thence run North parallel with the West
line of Section 36, 227.66 feet to the North right of way line
for Canal C-25 for the point of beginning: Thence continue North
517.34 feet; thence run East parallel with the South line of Section
36, 559.7 feet; thence run South parallel with the West line of
Section 36, 517.46 feet to the North line of Canal C-25; thence
run West 559.7 feet to the point of beginning. (6.65A)
Indianola Groves (No. 3)
-- Section 36, Township 34S, Range 39E - SW¼ of SW% - less N 517.34
feet of S~ ~45 feet of E 559.7 feet of W 584.7 feet & less SFWMD
/~_Roads _(26~O8 AC) ' ~
(Location: Northeast coenr of Kings Highway and Angle Road)
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent
to all adjacent property owners.
If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued
from time to time.
Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County
Commissioners are electronically recorded. Any person who decides
to appeal any action taken by the Board of County Commissioners
at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such
purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
/s/ Havert L. Fenn, Chairman
k, ~t'ICE OF CHANGE OF LAND USE *~
· :- The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners proposes to change the use of land within the area shown in the map in this advertisement.
A public hearing on the proposal will be held on Thursday, August 7, 1986 at 5:30 P.M. at Room 101, St. Lucia County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, Florida.
:- PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE CO. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
A.* Petitionof JuneR. Lentz etal
B,- Petition of Hayslip Landscape
-. C.- Petition of Jode Groves, Inc.
D.- Petition of Robert Fender, et al
· E,- Petition of Wm. E, Carpenter
F.- Petition of Laura B. Hancock
~ G.* Petition of Malcolm 8- Sytvia Collins
H.- Petition of Charles Et Jeans)re Slount
'* :' I.- Petition of K. Terrance Mock
* ' J.- Petition of Ft. Pierce 30 West
; - K.- Petition of Rose E. Baumker
; - L.- Petition of Potter/Cleghorn
.... M.-'Petition of H.F. Martek, Jr., loc.
N.- Petition of Minton Sun/Indianola Groves
O.- Petition of Thomas Zaydoo
P.~ Petition of Bd. of County Commissioners
.~ G.~ Petition of John Church
R.- Petition of Sessie Minton, et al
~,. S.- Petition of Dorothy L. Foster ..'"' ST. LUCIE
: : T.- Petition of Strszzulla Bros. Co. ," COUNTY
:- If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. . - -
'- Copies of the proposed amendments to the St. Lucia County Growth Management Policy Plan are available for public review Et the Offic~ of the St. Lucis County Development Coordin~tOr-
~; Building and Zoning Division, Boom 201, 2300 Virginii~ Avenue. Ft. Pierce, Florida, during normal business hours.
Please note that'all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boa~d of Courlty Commie-
_ ~--> stoners at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbat~ record of the proceedings is made.
Ail interested 3arsons may appear and will be given an opportunity to be heard regarding the transmittal of these Plan Amendments at this time.
:~: ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
,'- BOARD of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
: ,/SI Hayer) L. Form
Rose E. Baumker:-
: : A · June R. Leo)z, et al: - K · F~:om RL (Residential Low) to CG (Common,al General); k3catsd along
From R L {Residential Low) to CG (Commercial General); located at the Northeast comer South
U.S. 1 and Lennard Road. Avenue, sPDroximateh/~ mile Ess)of JeakJns Road. ~
From RL (Residential Low) to CG (Commercial General); located along the North side of Sesger From RL (Rssldentia) LOW) to CG (Commercial Gesen~,~ at thel~orthse~ corp. er ~f N[et-
Road, Approximately 600 ft. West of South U.S. 1. zger Road {Ave. El arid North 37th St, -, ~ ~,-
C. Jode Groves, inc.; Me H. F. Mar)ok, Jr,, inc.:
From RL (Residentlal Lowl to CG (Commercial General); located at the Northwest comer of South grthe I~side o~Altgle
~' 25th St. and West Midway Rd. :
D. Robert Fender, et al: :
' - From R L (Residential Low) to CG (Commercial General); located at the Southw~'t comer Of South
~ 25th St. and West Midway Rd.
:: £. Wm. ~, Ceres,tar: O.
From R L (Residential Low) to RM {Residential Medium); located along the East side of Sunrise
Blvd.. approximately 1600 ft. South of SoU Avar~ue.
F. Laura B. Hancock:
From RM [Residential Medium) to CG (Commercial General); lees)ed st the Norb~esst comer of
,- South 2Sth St. and Edwards Road.
From RM (Residential Medium) to CG (Commercial {~enerat); located along the Nc~'th side Of Ed-
" wards Road, approximately 300 f~. East of South 25th St.
· '- H. Charles Et Jeenette Rlouot: ' - ~ · - ,' , ' .
~'~, From CG (Commercla] General to RM (Residential M~ium); Iocate~ et)he N~laam ~ of * ·
.*~ South 40th St. and Har,~ey Avenue. * , · r . ,
,- ~. K. Terrence Mock:
From RL (Residential Low) to CT (Commercial Tourist): located at t[~ie
Highway end Graham Road.
:- j. Ft. Pierce 30 West: T.
From SU (Semi-Urban) to RL (Residential Lowl: located along the SYouth side of Orange Avenue,
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATOR
J. GARY AMENT
July 29, 1986
In compliance with the provisions of the Florida Statutes, you are
hereby advised that Minton Sun, Inc. and Indianola Groves (No. 3)
a Florida Partnership, by Agent: Robert Lloyd, have petitioned the
Board of County Commissioners to amend the Future Land Use Classifi-
cation of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from
SU (Semi Urban) to IL (Light Industrial Development) for the following
described property:
Minton Sun, Inc.
From the Southwest corner of Section 36, Township 34 South, Range
39 East, run East 25 feet; Thence run North parallel with the West
line of Section 36, 227.66 feet to the North right of way line
for Canal C-25 for the point of beginning: Thence continue North
517.34 feet; thence run East parallel with the South line of Section
36, 559~7 feet; thence run South parallel with the West line of
Section 36, 517.46 feet to the North line of Canal C-25; thence
run West 559.7 feet to the point of beginning. (6.65A)
Indianola Groves (No. 3)
· - Section 36, Township 34S, Range 39E - SW¼ of SW¼ - less N 517.34
feet of S 7~5 feet of E 559.7 feet of W 584.7 feet & less SFWMD
& Roads (26~08 AC) ..........
(Location: Northeast corner of Kings Highway and Angle Road)
A public hearing on the petition will be held at 5:30 P.M. on Thursday,
August 7, 1986, in Room 101, St. Lucie County Administration Building,
2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons
will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time.
Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commis-
sioners are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal
any action taken by the Board of County Commissioners at this meeting
will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need
to ensure that a verbtim record of the proceedings is made.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above described parcel,
please forward this notice to the new owner. If you have any ques-
tions, additional information may be obtained by calling Area Code
305, 466-1100, Extension 359.
Very truly yours,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY, FLORIDA
Havert L. Fenn, ChairmanV
HAVERT ~JENN, District No. 1 · E. E. GREEN, District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX District No. 5
County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce. FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100
Coordinator: Ext. 316 · Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317
INTER-OFFICE ~K)RANDUM
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
TO: Board of County Commissioners
Weldon B. Lewis, County Administrator
FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney
C. A. NO.: 86-373
DATE: July 29, 1986
SUBJECT: Revisions to Chapter 163.3184, Florida Statute~s -
Adoption of Comprehensive Plan, or Element or
Portion thereof
At the recent regular session of the Florida Legislature,
Senate Bill 978, which amended several sections of the LOcal
Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation
Act (also known as Chapter 163, Florida Statutes) was passed land
signed into law. One of the many amendments to this Act dealt
with the procedures to be followed for amending a L~cal
Government's Comprehensive PIan. Under the previous statute, the
board of county commissioners, only had to certify that the LOcal
Planning Agency held a public hearing on the proPOsed
comprehensive plan, element, or portion thereof prior to its
transmittal to the State Land Planning Agency for review. Under
the new law, the board of county commissioners is required to
hold a public hearing on the proPOsed plan or plan amendment
prior to the transmitting of that plan or amendment to the State
Land Planning Agency for review.
On July 24, 1986,-Rhoda P. Glasco, an attorney for the State
of Florida Department of Community Affairs opined that the County
must follow the procedures as amended by Chapter 86-191, Laws of
Florida, even though all of the petitions were filed before the
July 1, 1986, effective date.
attached to this memorandum.
Community Affairs is taking
A copy of Ms. Glasco's letter is
Apparently, the Department of
the position that the date ~of
advertiSing determines whether the new law applies.
In view of Ms. Glasco's July 24, 1986~ opinion, I recommend
that the Board immediately schedule a transmittal hearing(s)
that the July amendments may be transmitted to the Department
· Community Affairs as soon as possible. Since the Board had
.meeting scheduled for July 29 (Fifth Tuesday), staff, aftier
discussions with the Board Chairman, scheduled the transmittm/
hearing for Thursday August 7, 1986, at 5:30 p.m. By copy 9f
this memorandum to the County Administrator, I am requesting th.~t
he place this item on the August 5, 1986 agenda for "after t]~e
fact" permission to advertise.
.The. Development Coordinator. and I will continue t6 revi~
the amendments to this act and hob to present to you in the near
future a sugary report on w~t, if any, present county Policies
or~.regulations, must be amended. If you have any questions ~n
this matter please let me know.
DSM/SlS.
Res~ctf~ly submitted,
County Attorne~
Copies To:
Development Coordinator
Planning Administrator
Local Planning Agency
Land Use Amendment Petition Files
Press/Public
S T A T E 0 F F L 0 R i D A sT. ~.USlE CO~:;n',
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2571 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301
BOB GRAHAM
Governor
Mr. Daniel McIntyre
St. Lucie County Attorney
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, Florida 33482
July 24, 1986
- TOM LEWIS, JR.
Secret~
Dear Mr. McIntyre:
You requested over the telephone, an opinion as to whether
the procedures in section 163.3184 as amended by Chapter 86-191,
Laws of Florida, are applicable to your current local
comprehensive plan amendments. You stated that your notice for a
public hearing by the local planning agency was advertised on
July 2, 1986, with hearings scheduled on July 23rd and 24th.
It is my opinion that the County must follow the
procedures as amended by Chapter 86-191, Laws of Florida, and
effective July 1, 1986. Therefore, the local governing body will
be required to hold at least two public hearingS, the first which
must be held at the transmittal stage (See Section 9, Chapter
86-191, Laws of Florida). The second public hearing must be held
at the adoption stage.
As stated to you, the local planning agency must still
hold at least one public hearing with due notice pursuant to s.
163.3174(4)(a), prior to making a recommendation to the governing
body. There is no longer the requirement that the local"
governing body determine that the LPA held a public hearing with
due public notice prior to transmittal.
The Department will make every effort to expedite the~
review and comment once the amendments are received. Should you
have any additional questions or concerns, please contact Dana
Minerva or me.
CC:
h~-~od~-~. Glasc~ ~-~~O
Attorney
Margaret-Ray Kemper
Dana Minerva
R~lph Hook
Bob Kessler
EMERGE~NCy MANAGEMENT ~ 'HOUSING AND COMMU~I.I.TY DEVELOP~MENT r~ ~sOU~E PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
LOCAL PLANNING
ST o LUCIB COUNTY, FLORIDA
NINUTF. S
Chairman J. J. Sciturro, Robert Carman, Mabel Fawsett,
U. B. Wetherington,J. P. Terpening, Patricia Ferrick
and Patricia. King
Pegg~ Harris and Willi .am Myers (Both excused absences)
County Attorney Daniel McIntyre; Dennis Murphy,
Planner; and Karen Jones, Secretary.
~v~(s):~
~%TE OF ~: 7/23/86
(XI~V~): 7:00 P.M.
PAGe: 1
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
JULY 23, 1986 ~
Page 10
PUBLIC HEARING:
Petition of Minton Sun, Inc., and Indianola Groves (No. 3),
a Florida partnership (By Agent: Robert Lloyd) to amend the
Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management
Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to IL (Industrial, Li§ht)
for property located on the northeast corner of Kings Hi~ghway
and Angle Road.
STAFF COMMENTS:
This petition is one of several pending in the area of
the St. Lucie County International Airport. At this time,
County Staff must defer any formal recommendation of approval
or denial on this petition, until such time as the on-
going Airport Land Use studies are able to provide prelimi-
nary data. Staff expects to begin reviewing these reports
in early fall of this year. Staff does not recommend
this Board table this petition; rather, we suggest one
of the following actions: approval, denial, forward with
no recommendation.
Attorney Robert Lloyd was present to speak on behalf of the petitioners.
Mr. John Minton and Mr. Tom Minton were also present. Mr. Lloyd
stated the GMPP for the parcel being petitioned was SU and the zoning
was AR-1. The petitioners learned that their use was non-conforming
when they tried to expand their facilities and were unable to obtain
a building permit. This change had happened at the time the GMPP
was adopted and the petitioner simply was not aware of it. The property
does meet the criteria of the GMPP for light industrial in that ~t
is a location of arterial roads, also has water and sewer available
at Angle Road and is buffered adequately from any surrounding resi-
dential uses. Mr. Lloyd reserved time for rebuttal in the event
of opposition.
Robert Quick, adjacent property o%~ner, spoke in favor of this petition..
Kenny Hogan, representing Hogan Bros. Welding, neighbors of the peti-
tioner, stated they were strongly in favor of the petition.
There was no opposition to this petition.
Mr. Sciturro then closed the public portion of the hearing.
A motion was made by Mr. Terpening to approve the petition. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Carman and upon roll call the motion was
unanimously approved by the Agency.
Mr. Sciturro stated the petition would be sent to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation for approval.
Petition ~/ 6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SU83ECT:
MEMORANDUM
Local Planning Agency
Planning Administrator/.//~
Ouly 16, 1986
Petition of Minton Sun, Inc., and Indianola Groves (NO. 3),
a Florida Partnership (by agent Robert.Lloyd) to Ameind the
Future Land Use ~ Maps of the St. Lucia County Growth
Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi-Urban) to IL
(Industrial, Light)..°
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
EXISTING G.M.P.P.
PROPOSED G.M.P.P.:
pROpOSED USE:
PARCEL SIZE:
SURRQUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
FIRE PROTECTION:
WATER/SEWER SERVICE:
COMMENTS:
Northeast corner of Kings
Highway and Angle Road.
AR-1 (Agricultural,..Residential
I du./ac)
SU (Semi-Urban)
IL (Industrial~ Light)
The Petitioner. propose~ 'to
expand the'existing Rackin!g
House Operations
Approximately 32.5 acres
AG, and AR-1
Properties in the general area
are used fbr citrus production.
There is a large undeveloped
parcel directly west of this
site.
The AirPort Fire Station is
approximatelY 3 miles away.i
To be provided on site,
however, public services arle
available along Angle Road.
St.
must
This petition is one of several pending in the area of the
Lucie County International Airport. At this time, County Staff
defer any formal recommendation of approval or denial on this
Memo
Ouly 16, 1986
petition, until such time as the ongoing Airport Land Use studies are
able to provide preliminary data. Staff expects to begin reviewing
these reports in early fall of this year. Staff does not' recommend
this Board table this petition. Rather, we suggest one of the
follOwing.actions:
a. recommend approval
b. recommend denial
c. forward with no recommendation.
GMS/DOM/lg
CC:
County Attorney
Robert M. Lloyd
AGENDA - LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
WEDNESDAY
JULY 23, 1986
7:00 P.M.
Petition of Minton Sun, Inc. and Indianola Groves (NOo 3)
a Florida Partnership, by Agent: Robert Lloyd, to amend the future
land use classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management
Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to IL (Light Industrial Development)
for the following described property:
Minton Sun, Inc. ~
From the Southwest corner of Section 36, Township 34 South, Rang~
39 East, run East 25 feet; Thence run North parallel with the West
line of Section 36, 227.66 feet to the North right of way line
for Canal C-25 for the point of beginning: Thence continue North
517.34 feet; thence run East parallel with the South line of Section
36, 559.7 feet; thence run South parallel with the West line of
Section 36, 517.46 feet to the North line of Canal C-25; thence
run West 559.7 feet to the point of beginning. (6.65A)
Indianola Groves (No. 3)
Section 36, Township 34S, Range 39E - aW¼ of aW¼ - less N 517.34
feet of S 745 feet of E 559.7 feet of W 584 7 feet & less SFWMD
& Roads (26.08 AC) '
(Location: Northeast corner of Kings Highwa~Ang~e-~-o~d_) ....
Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning
Agency are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to
appeal any action taken by the Local Planning Agency at this meeting
will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may
need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made.
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent
to all adjacent property owners.
Date
LAm) USZ CLASS'r!
Applicant ' s Name:
Applicant' s Address:
MINTON SUN, INC. ~,nd INDIANOLA GROVES (No. 3 ), a
Ftor,id, a ,Par~nershmp ~~: ~u~~~
Angel Road and Kings Highway ~-~, ~/.~, /~70
,,P a [~_=_-.~_r ~_70 , t'~' P'., ~Ti 339'~
Fo~ Pierce, Florida 33450
A~plicant's Phone Number: 464-3502
I (We) do hereby petition the St. LucleCounty Planning and
S~mtmg Com~uton and the St. Lucle County Board of County
ChB~IJSIO~eES tO change the Future Land Use Classification of the
following property:
Legal Description: (Type or print only in black ink)
SEE EXHIBIT A AT~ACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
7__.~nton Sun, Inc., - $332-0015-000/3 and Indi~ Grov~ (No.3)
Property Tax I.D.S~ ~331-0000-000/2 , From: , SU To: IL, ,,
~y (Our) reason for making this request is: .T.o c,onform, to e,x,is, tin9
light industrial use (citrus packing house) and to allow expansion
of existing use.
I (We) dO hereby certify that I (we) own in fee
simple all of the abOve described property and have
legal right to request a change in Future Land Use of
said property.
I (we) do hereby certify that I (we) own in fee
simple that portion of the above described property
for which a'change in Future Land Use is requested,
described as ...................
The remainder of the property described in paragraph
Jl above for which change in Future Land Use is
requested is owned by
and that I (we) certify that the above legal
description submitted by me (us) represents the
property I (we) wish to have reclassified.
hearing or will be
MINTON SUN. INC
Agent
INDIANOLAGROVES (No. 3)
, , k' I (We) understand that I (we) must be present at the
represented by my (sure, gent.
Petitioner la)
O.R. Minton. Partner
IK)TZC~ Ill COMPLTAI~B WITH ~ 163.3187 ~l~ ~A~
LEGAL DF. SCRIFrIONS
Minton Sun. inc.
Prom nne Sounnwesn corner of Sec~zon 36, Township 34 South, Range 39
East, run Ease 25 feet: Yhence run North oaraliel with the West line
of %ecnion 36. _=~.66 feet to nne North right of way line for Canal
C-25 for the point of 0eginning: Thence continue North 517.34 feet:
Thence run East parallel with the South line of Section 36, 559.7 feet:
Thence run South parallel with the West line of Section 36, 517.~6
feet to the North line of Canal C-25: Thence run West 559.7 feet to
the point of beginning. (6.65 A)
Indianola Groves (No. 3)
Section 36, Township 34S, Range 39E - SWI of SW~ - less N 517.34 feet
of S 745 feet of E 559.7 feet of W .584.7 feet & less SFWMD & Roads
(26.08 AC)
Note:
Together the above comprise the SW~ of the SW~ of Section 36,
Township 34S, Range 39E less SFWMD & Roads
EXHIBIT "A'
SU
IL
BLUE
GREEN
N
36-34-39
INC & INDIANOLA GROV£SCNO. 3)
I~ A~ENT: ItOBERT LLOYD
TO. CHANGE FUTURE LA~ USE CLASSIFICAI~.ON
PETITION OF ~INTON SUN,
FROM ~ TO IL
AR-1 BLUE
AG GREEN
IL RED
N
36-34-39
PETITION OF MINTON SUN, IIIC & INDIANOLA GROVES(NO.
BY AGENT:' ~OBERT LLOYD
" TO CHANGE FUTURE LA,ID USE CLASSIFICAi'ION
FROI~ SU TO IL
')MON R$ D6V6L O PM 6N
COOFID T
In INATo
hereby a
-
- Dun, ~_ ~ P~one~~ Zndus~tl' aana~_ ~nd O-
~c. = ~cy: c~xal De~e~ent.p~e C/ass~Oned
[from the S-
. ~. East, 2 UUthwest _
~ne O~ ~z-un Eao~
rO~ r._- °ectih~k z5 ~_ ~ of Se~ '
51~ ~nal C -~ 36 ,~et; Th- UCion 3=
Sec.] ~.:7 fe__~enoe ~._ Point o¢ .co the '.~ th Pa=.'~, J4
West ~g~517 4~ -- e z'un o Pa~al~-. ~n~: m~ ~*'~ o~
In~= -7 ~eet ~_' co th~ J~ Pa~a~, ~?z~ the oe uo~ti.]~
~aanola ~ ~u the _"= Nott~ ~el ~ °outh ~..~ue No~,
==Orion ~_; =a (No =. - of be~']~= of Ca.l-U West ~= ~ Sect~_
~--~ ~ S :~ ~' (6 - ~1
' ~- Rg~s (26" f R n .65A) One,ce
~on: N- '- -- ' feet ' aW% _~
A nn~ U~theast c- of W 58~r, SW% _ l-
~&on BU~ July ~ the n~ . ~ ~ighwa.. °rWMD
O~
UDDozt,.~ce, F. cy 4dm. .
~ ~u~ ~o ~ ~ci~ ~ ~s aDH ~ ~ge~c~. ~ue8 ~_ ~ A~
~Jease f~_~Onge~ ~_ -~U°~d ofL~°t suc'~ at thi.~ aPPea~cY
305 f addi~ c~/s n~-~Pe~t~ == ~¢-OCeed~_~USe ~..~z~g
, 466_~,~<0nal ~ "~Cice ~ ~UJac~ ~ugs i~ ~3'need
~OO, ex~<nfo~ma~~ co the ~i'~c to th~ -o made
s~°n 3.S~n may b~ .owne~ ~boue ~_
~' .~,~ oy Callin~e any ~]cel
You~s
HA~aTL FEN.. ~CAL PLA~ .... '
~ ,,~. Oisrri~N° . o~'. LUc¢~*~VING
Kj · · · a ~. ~aS~N O' ~ ~ ~ COUNT~*=ENCY
C°ordinoto. . 2aOO vi-_. · urri~ No. 2 e JACK ,.- ~ V , ~, ~. _ . ' FLORIDA
' ': eXL 09~ - - rg~nio Av~- Coun~ ~' aalEGER D,.~ u. j ~ -- ~ / ~
..... ,~-. ' u~O · Z~_ ~nOne (0~, ~'~MINIX ~.
-- - .... unin9. ~. . uo] 466 - · ~srrio
r _ r ........ ~ Enforce~en* ~