Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Callaway Land & Cattle Co (13)
MEMORANDUM TO; Zoning Aoministz, al:o~ FROM: Planning Aclmin~stz-alzoz,~ DATE: Septem~e~ 1/4, 1907 SUBOECT. TI3e I~OoOs OevelopmentP'U'O' _ Request P~elimina~:y Plan App~ova1 AttaOneo you will ffino an application ¢o~ ext ~Yimina~y ~evelopment Plan approval ~o~ the ~Ooos U.D. Please SCneouleto a PuU110 hea~ing ~e¢o~e C°m~iSsione~s ~eview t~is ~a~te~. This ~e s:cneOuje~ DeCode Oece~e~ 8, 1~87. Please Petiti°ne~ H.F. Na~tek~ g~.~ is no lOnge~ involv ~oject. T~e ne Please note thisw Owne~ o¢ ~eco~o ~s eO~ection wne~eve~ itPe~e~is appgop~ia~ g' Po~tl ~f you have any questions on this ~atte~ Pl ase mysel~ o~ Dennis know T~ank you. ~/DOM/mg (8z6) File _ H.F. Ma~tek Rezone _ AG to PUD FiJe _ Eooos o¢ Ft. Pierce P.U.D. OF COUNTY COMMi$SION£R$ Feoruary 24, 1987 J- GARY AMENT Mr. Bartholomew Veloce 147 Nelson Avenue Jersey City, New Jersey Subject: H.F. Martek Jr. Dear Mr. Veloce: 07307 Inc. Plan Amendment OgH/mg VELOCEi(B4) ce: Zoning AdminiStrator H. F. ~artek, Jr. This office is in recei.ot of your recent letter i:~ about the results of the above described Plan Amendmen] and the status of your Property in the Pine Acres Subdi Pierce, Florlda. On December 18, 1987, the St. Luci BOard of County Commissioners granted apProval to request to change the Land Use Classification of his from AG (Agricultural) to R4 (Residential Low). It Nartek,s intention to construct a retirement community property. If you have any further questions aboul development Plan, Please let me know. In answer to your second question, please be advises your PrOperties (tax ID #3414-501-0054_000_0 and #~414-501 000-9) are Presently zoned AG (Agricultural) and have a Classification of AG (Agricultural). These properti, Considered to be nonconforming Since they do not ha. frontage on a elther a public right-of-way or a private constructed to County standards. In Order to be eligi apply for a building Permit, it will be necessary for - obtain a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Your lo typical of this unrecorded Subdivision. To date, no applied for, or received, any variances in this area. If you need any additional information, Please let me ~]~~cerelt~ nner / , / I Inc. P.A. file J HAVERT L. FENN. District2300No. ~ Virginia "~ JUDY CULPEPP£R,AvenueDiSrrictll CounryN°' 2 eAdministratorJACK KRIEGER,. WELDoNDiSrnct No.B. LEWIs3 · R. DALE TREFELNER. Dismcr No. 4 · JIM MINIX, Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone ('305) 466-11 O0 Director: Ext 398 · Building: Ext. 344 e Planning; Ext. 316 ® Zoning; Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: ,DI da ............................... - n~ on 386, in O0 Virginia Nill be need a ~d to ~e. If it ued from .................... nay be 359'~ If BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION£RS January 16, 1987 D V( LOPMCNT COORDINATOR J. GARY AMENT Mr. H. F. Martek, Jr. H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. 925 N.Ei Commercial Street .Jensen Beach, Florida 33457 Dear Mr. Martek: Please be advised that on Thursday, December 18, 1986, the Board of County Commissioners granted your petition to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural Productive) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) located on the north side of Angle Road between 1-95 and the Florida Turnpike (north of Canal C-25). Ainformation.COpy of the recorded Ordinance No. 86-89 is enclosed for your Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Jim Minix., Chairman JM/dcm Enclosure HAVERT L. FENN, District No. I · E. E. GREEN, District NO.county2 · JACKAdrninis~rarorKRIEGER. District_ WELDoNN°' 3B. LEWIS · R. DJ~LE TREFFLNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX. District No. 5 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Coordinator: Ext. 398 ·. Building: Ext._ 344 ·_ Planning:. Ext. 316 · Zoning: EXt. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 31 7 ORDINANCE NO. 86-89 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING T~E ST. LUCIE COUNTY GROWT~ MANAGEMENT POLICY PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 86-01 BY CHANGING T~E LAND USE DESIGNATION OF T~E PROPERTy LOCATED ALONG T~E NORT~ SIDE OF CANAL C-25 BETWEEN 1-95 AND THE SUNSHINE STATE PARKWAY FROM AG (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN) (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVE) TO RL (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL}; MAKING FINDINGS; PROVIDING FOR MAKING T~E NECESSARY CHANGES ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF ST, LUCIE COUNTY; PROVIDING PROVISIONS AND --- FOR CONFLICT SEVERABILI . ING WITH THE DEPARm~ ..... ~'z, PROVIDING FOR ~%TE. AND THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND ADOPTION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. H. F. Martek, Jr. presented a petition to amend the future land use classification set forth in the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural, Productive) to ~ (LOW Density Residontial) for ~he property descr3bed below. 2. The St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency, after holding a public hearing on December 10, 1986 of which due notice was published at least seven (7) days prior to said hearing and all Owners of property within fi~e hundred feet (500') were notified by mail of said hearing, has recommended that the Board amend the future land use Classification set forth .in the St. LUcie County. Growth Management Plan from AG (Agricultural, Productive) to 1:~ (Low Density Residential) for the property 3. The Board held a public hearing on December 18, 1986, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Fort Pierce News Tribune on December 9 and December l~ i ~ ~ ~.,- ..... .-~ ........ ! 0526; 532 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: The future land use classification set forth in the St. Lucie County 'Growth Management Policy Plan for that property described as follows: South 1/2 of Sec. 33, T. 34 S, R 39 E, St. Lucie County, FL. less canals C20 & C25, lying East of Fla. Turnpike & West of 1-95, and all easements thereof. Together with that part of the SW 1/4 lying southwesterly of I95 Right-of-Way, less to SFWMD, Sec. 34 T 34, R 39. , (Location: North side of Angle Road between 1- 95 and Florida Turnpike, north of Canal C- 25 .) owned by H. F. Martek, Jr., be, and the same is hereby changed .from AG (Agricultural, Productive) to RL (Low Density Resi denti al ) . B. FINDING OF CONSISTENC~. This Board specifically determines, that the approved change in future land use plan is consistent with the policies and obi ectives contained in the St. Luci e County Growth Management Policy Plan. C. CHANGES '~2) ZONING The St. Lucie County Community DeVelopment 'Director is hereby authorized and directed, to cause the changes to-be made on the Official. Zoning. Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this ordinance. D. CONFLICTING PROVIS ION.~:. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance.. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any Person, property or circumstances, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property or circumstances. F. APPLICABILITy OF ORdINANCe:. This ordinance shall be applicable as stated in Paragraph A. The Clerk be and hereby is directed forthwith to send a certi f led copy of this ordinance to th e Bureau o f Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. ~"' -'-- -"~ - ~" ~-'- ---'-' - ~ ~ l~ - : ~'--: -~-L~.~2~.~. ordinance The County Attorney shall .send a certified .copy of this of COmmunity Affairs, 2571 Executive Center ~Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301. I. ~FFECTIVE DATF. Th/s or di nan ce sh al 1 take effect upon receipt of official acknowledgment from the Office of Secretary of State that this ordinance has been filed in that office. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix Vice-Chairman Jack Krieger Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner Commissioner Havert L. Fenn a~e Aye Aye Aye Commissioner Judy Culpepper Aye PASSED AND DULX ADOPTED this 18th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNT~ COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND 8008Z8 '87 J~N -5 Fi2:45 FILED Ak:~ SI. LUCI~i C3, ;: :'~-'; ' ~MH-5 ORANGE AG GREEN AR-] ~BLUE £:N PETITION OF HoF. M~RTEK, J'R., INC, TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND OSE CLASSIFICATION FROM AG TO RL I 34-3 AG GR£EN SU ~B~UE RL PETITION OF H.F. ARTEK, JR., INC. TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION ~OM AG TO RL BOARD OF COUNTY CONNTSSiONER$~ ~ ~C~E .COUN'~ya, .FLORIDA .SpECTAL_ pEETING Date: December 18, 1986 convened: 7:15 p.m. Tapes: #1 - #3 adjourned: 12:00 a.m. Commissioners Present= Chairman Sim Minix, Vice Chairman 3ack Krieger, Havert L. Fenn, 3udy Cqlpepper, R. Dale Trefelner (Com. Culpepper was absent during--discussion/vDte on items 1 through 5 but thereafter participated in the meeting. Com. Fenn cipatedwas absent in the during meeting, discussion/vote on item 1 but thereafter patti- Others Present: Daniel Mclntyre, County Attorney, 3. Gary Ament, Community Development Coordinator, Gary Schindler, Planning Administrator, Theresse du 8ouchet, Deputy Clerk 1~.AGPETITIONTo R£ '-'~"2-~--~70F H;F. )NARTEK~ ..... 3R. FOR A CHANGE IN LA__ND USE FRON ODe Martek, President of H.F. Martek, Or., Inc., appeared before the Board to request approval of the proposed change in land use. Based on the recommendations of the Local Planning Agency, the Pianning and Zoning Commission, and the recommendation of' Staff, it was moved by Com. K2ie. ger, seconded by Com. Fenn, to adopt Ordinance 86-89 amending the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, Ordinance No. 86-01 by changing the land use desig- nation of the property located along the north side of Canal C-25 between 1-95 and the Sunshine State Parkway from AG to RL; making findings; -'providing for making the necessary changes on the official zoning map of St. Lucie County; and, motion unanimously carried, upon roll call, M E M 0 R A~U~ TO: FROM: DATE- SUBJECT: County Administrator County Commission Plannlng Administrator /~ December 15, 1986 Petltion of H.F. Martek gr., Inc., to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Pollcy Plan from AG (Agricultural, Productive) to RL (Low Denslty Residential) On ThurSday, December 18, 1986, you will be asked to review a petition on behalf of H.F. Martek gr., Inc., to ameno the Future Lano Use Maps of the St. Lucie County GrOwth Management Polic.y Plan from AG to RL, for property located along Canal C-25, .bqtween 1-95 and.The Sunshine State Parkway. Thls petitlon was presenteo to the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency for review on December 10, 1986, at which time, this Agency voteo 5 to 0 to recommend approval of this petition. In offering this recommenoation of approval, this Agency determined that the proposed petition is consistent with the Policies and Objectives of .the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan. As required under Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, County Staff has transmitted this amendment request to the FloriOa Department of Community Affairs for interagency review. In comments received back from the Department, concern was expressed about the the status of this project as a potential Development of Regional Impact. It is the opinion of St. Lucie County Staff, that this amendment does not meet the requirements for Development of Regional Impact Review. On September 22, 1986, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council reported that this proposed amenOment did not conflict with any regional plan or policy. Attached for your review, is a copy of the original staff comments on this petition, transmitted to you on August l, 1986, ano the most recent memorandum transmitted to the St. LUcie County Local Planning Agency on December 2, 1986. By separate memoranOum, the County Attorney,s Office will be providing a Draft OrOinance approving this petition. Decembe~ 15, 1986 Page 2 Petition: H.F. Hartek Or. know. If you have any questions on this petition, please let me GMS/DOM/mg MARTEK4(B3) cc: County Attorney H.F. Matrek Geralo S. 3ames Commission Secretary Press/Public THURSDAY AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 18, 1986 7:00 P.M. Petition of. H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural Productive) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) for the following described property: __South.. 1/~.. of Sec. ~3, T. ~.S, R ~9 E, St. Lu,¢le. C,o, unt~ FL.' less ca~a!s . C20 & C25,. lying,, F~st..of Fla., ,T~plke ,& Wes,.~ of 1-95., a~,, all ens~ents thereof.. To~ether w~th t,h,at-part of the SW. 1/.~ lyin~ sou. thw. este~-ly of I95 Rl~ht-o£-Wa¥, less ~_9_$.F_._W~4_D, 'Sec._ 3~, T 3~, R 39.. . .... (Location': North side of Angle Road be%~een 1-95 and Florida Turnpike, north of. Canal C-25. ) Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all~ proceedings_ _ before_ the Board of County Com~nissioners are ~!ec~ronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board of,County Conmnissioners at this-meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for sluch purpose may~need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA dcm /S/ Jim Minix, Chairman MEMORANDUM TO: Local Planning Agency FROM: Planning Administrator DATE: December 2, 1986 SUBJECT: Petition of H.F. Martek Jr., Inc. (by Agent, Bruce Abernethy) to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucid County GrOwth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural Productive) to RE (Low Density Residential Development) On August 7, 1986, the St. Lucid County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing for the purpose of authorizing the transmittal of this petition to the Florida Department of Community Affairs as required under Chapter 163.3184, FIorida Statute. As of t~is date, my office has not received any return comments from the Department about this petition. On Septemoer 22, 1986, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning CounciI held a hearing on the proposed petition, and reported that the .prciPosal did not conflict with any adopted Council pla6s or polic es. Attached you will find a COpy of the original staff report on this matter. County Staff recommends approval of this petition. GMS/DOM/mg MARTEK3(B3) cc: Cgunty Attorney Petition # 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: LOCATION: MEMORANDUM County Administrator County Commission Planning Administrator ,m//~ August 1, 1986 Petition of H.F. Martek, Jr., to Amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural) to RL (Residential, Low). EXISTING. ZONING: EXISTING G.M.P.p. PROPOSED G.M~P.p.: PROPOSED USE: PARCEL SIZE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: FIRE PROTErCTION: North side of Angle Road between 1-95 and the Florida Turnpike (North of Canal C-25) AG (Agriculture) AG (Agricuiture) RL (Residential, Low) The Petitioner proposes to- construct a 950 unit Retirement Community~ 278 acres AG, AR-l, CN,. and RMH-5 Properties to the north~ west, and east are undeveloped and may be u~ed to intermittent grazing purposes. To the south is the Goiden Ponds Mobile Home Park. Airport Fire Station ts approximately 5 1/2 miles away. #ATER/SE~ER SERVICE: To be Provided on Site. CONNENTS: On Ouly 2~, 1986, the St. Lucte County Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this Proposed petition.. The Petitioner ts proposing to construct a 950 unit 'Planned Unit Oevelopment on approximately 280 acres. This results in an average density of about ~.4 d.u./ac. At the 3uly 2~, 1986 hearing, there was little public comment on this petition.However, the Local Planning T £ Martek Petition August 1, 1986 Agency voiced several questions including this PrOject,s status in regard to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. In 1985, the Florida Legislature approved an amendment to the threshold requirements-for Developments of Regional Impact. In M granted approval to n~ ....... ay of this yea~. th~ de , ~u~,,~,~ue ~6-08 ' .- ~"~ Veimope~ s =esponsibility the de~--%- ~.zch %Stablzshed as the pa=ticuia= p~oject is indeed a D~,-~'")zna]zO~'-OF ~hethe~ o= not a ralzsm between the nresum~(,.~ ~__%~opm~g~ ~F_~egzona1 Im ac ' i The pmetition nreo~.~ ~_ uJ,~'u~nozds zoen:zrzed in a ~ ~ zf t . . ~ ~,~,,~u uu.you a~ th' · - Ch p er 380.06. p~ov~zons of this 0~(~-~ ~._ ~ zs t~me ~s not effected h, ueen advised ~ha~ his pendin~' Plann-- X'--H~we~e~' t~e develope= has sub2eS~ to ~hese =e.,,~g~..u,.cnus~ _ _ co. unz~ Bevezopment application. until ~he = · , ano wzll not be a , .is . __ ~. . ~quz=eaen~s of O=dinance 8'-"" --- c~ep~d fo= p=ocesszn · ~.~ a:~acnzng a copy of ~his O=dinan~.u° ~ge me~. ~o= you= =eco~dsg~ In ~e~a=d to this specific Plan Amendmen~ pe~i~ion~ County S~aff has de~e~mine~d tha~ the p~oposed =eques~ is generally consistent wi~h ~h.e,. developaen~ policies of ~he S~. Lucie County G~ow~h Manage~men~ Policy Plan fo~ the fo&lowing =easons: l. "The sub~ec~ p=ope=ty is located in an a~ea of ~he Couni~y ad~acen~ 8o o~ in ~he vicinty of ~wo approved 400-600 uni~ ~esiden~ial P~ojec~s. 2. The subjec~ p=ope~y is located within ~each of public ~a~¢= and sewe~ se=vices~ although capa'cl~y imp~Ovements may be necessary. ~. The subjec~ p~ope=~y doe~ no~ eve~ appea= ~o have been used fo= active ag=icul~u~al activities. Although, ~hts condition itself is no~.sufficlen~ =eason suppo~ ~hts amendmen~ given ~he ~o existing- developing coamuni~ies in ~hls a~ea~ a use othe~ ~han active ag=icul~u~al may be appropriate. At ~he DuiZy 2~ &~85 public hea~ing on ~his pe~ition~ ~he Lo~al.planning Agency vo~ed 7-0 ~o =ecoamend approval of this petitzon. ~f you have any questions on this pe~i~ion~ please le~ us k~Ow. CoUnty Attorne, H. F. Martek, Oimtter Stovan, Press/Public I 33/34-34-39 AG GREEN · SU 'B~UE RL ORANGE PETITION OF it.F. MARTEK, JR., INC. TO CHANGE FUTURE LANI) USE CLASSIFICATION FROM AG TO RL N~ RP1H-5 ORANGE AG GREEN AR-1 BLUE CN PURPLE PETITION OF H.F. IqARTEK, JR., INC. 'lO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FROIWl AG TO RL A H.' F. Mar~ek, Jr., Inc. 925 N.E. Commercial sCree~ Jensen Beach, Fl. 33457 A Lillian E. Luntta 125 Ocean Mayan Towers Palm Beach, Shores, Fl. 33404 Parcel 3 Golden Ponds St Lucie Assoc 944 E. Ocean Blvd ' Suite 250 B1-F Stuart, Fl.. 33494 -Loc 27 Raymond & Mary Brown, Etal 1212 W. Joy Lane Fort pieFce, F1.33450 Loc 2 Chas & Eileen Wise 1215 W. Joy Lane Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Avon~n~r, V;.2 Blk B Loc $0 Katherine Shuler C/O Fontenelle Hair Designers 2303 N.' US ~I Fort Pier=e, Fl. 3345~ Parcela. $ Jos. A. Ierovoliao 7620 S. V. 168ch Street Miami, F133157 OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIED A Dan Biele, Etal 3300 NE 36th St. Apt 806 Ft Lauderdale, Fl. 33308 Avon Manor, V. 1Blk A, Lot 1 Grant &Opan Purlee 1215 E. Joy Ln. Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Lot 28 .£oberc & ~thea Ruark, Eta1 P. O. Box 1991 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33454 Victor & MarCha BrTan, Etal P. O. Box 475 Naples, Fl. 33939 Avon Manor, V2 Blk B, Loc 51 John & Ltllian Loy 1214 E. Joy Lane Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 6 Frank &NeCCie Creca 1655 FIJC Bush Ave, Apt B 506 Brooklyn, N. y. 11210 I Parcel i & 2 H. J. Ross Assoc., Inc. 120 Leucadendra Dr. Coral Gables, Fl. 33156 Lot 2 Wm. D. Lanier, Etal P. O. Box 475 Naples, Fl. 33939 Lot 1 Frm~klin ~ Winifred~ad~ Rt 5, Box 700 Fort pierce,. Fi.'33451'~ Ava Chucta P. O' Box 3387 F°rC"Pterce, Fl. 33448' Parcel 4, 6'7 S~a~e of Florida 780 For~ Pierce, Fl. 33315 Parcel 7 '- Am & Corinne ~tchardson 4522 Vickie Ct. ~-vans, Ca. 30809 .Parcel 8 & 9,10,11,13,14~28 ( Corinne Richardson, Eta! 28 W. Flagler St., SUite 400 Miami, Fl. 33130 Parcel 16 & 17 Margaret Tiberio 1530 S. Broad Street Philadelphia, Pa. 19146 Parcel 21 F-,melia Sturgis 812 Ross Streeg Toms P~ver, N. J. 08753 Parcel 27 Edmund &Adelaide Luciano 461N. 13th Street Newark, N. J-'0llO7. Parcel 12 Chas & Evelyn Ioell P. O. Box 408 Shelter Hgts, N. y. 11965 Parcel 18 & 19 Columbus & Esther Pelosi 202 Bradford Road Marlton, N. J. Parcel 22 & 23 Bartholomew & AUlta Veloce Emerald Apt Bldg, #3 958 President Avenue Toms River, N. $. 08753 Parcel 29 ~argaret ~and¥ ,I$ New-Brunmelck Avenue Lavallette, N. J. 08735 :Parcel 15 Frank Simmonds 1806 Shore Blvd. Toms River, N. j. 08753 Rob, P. O. Seatt Parce Joan 1326 Port 25, 26 ~reet 33452 Parcel 30 Alber~ 2424 $. Apt 209 33435 Parcel 31 & 33. ' John G. Caruso, Jr. 313 Fourth Street. Union City, N. J. 07087 Parcel' 35 Phyllis B~rsn 18-05 21$th Street Bays/de, N. y. 11360' Parcel 32" Valenttno & Louise Borne/l/ 7 Brooklyn Avenue Lavallette, N. J. 08735 Parcel 36 Alvin & Particle Christopher Port Pierce, Fl. 33450 Parcel 34 '"Vtrgtlla 3461 ~I Ft. Laude . ! : Parcel 37 Jtll A~kar 211-10 l~Sch Bays/de, N. 33334 Parcel 38, 40,42,'44 Patrlc/aL~/tchell 3102 Live Oak Lane' Fort Pierce, Pl. 33482 Parcel 39 & 41, 43, F~w & Jan/th HOlmes 2792 North/aka Blvd Palm Beach Garden8, Fl. 334~0 Parcel 46 U.s. Att Southern ~taml, Fl. ACta: Lan'do ~arcel 47 Joseph & Julia Df -.a 6410 Marietta. Avarice Baltimore, Md. 21214 Parcel 50 Chas R. Sexton, Etal P. O. Box 1208 Veto Beach, Fl. 32960 Parcel 54 Lynn & Marion Myers Rt 5, Box 570 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 57 & 58 Thomas & Donna Buchanon Rt 5, Box 59I Fort Pierce, Fl. 33450 Parcel 61 E1 & Patricia Collnick Rt 5, Box 597 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parce~ 65 Oscar Johnson, Etal 9 S. E. ll~h Avenue Pompaao Beach, Fl. 33060 Parcel 48 Joe Selph Rt 5, Box 599 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 51 & 64 Minnie J.NHA~e~l~f::atc Rt 7, Box 553 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 55 Emily P. Beacom Rt 5, Box 590, Johnston Rd. Fort Pierce, Fi. 33450 Parcel 59 Mark & Theresa Hamilton 1703 Angle 'Road Fort Pierce, Fl. 33450 Parcel 62 James & Beverly Favorite Rt 5, Box 598A Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 66 Henry E. Wolfe 200 $~ First SC, Ste 902 H~ami, Fl. 33131 Parcel 49 Thomas & Linde Selph Rt 5, Box 598 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 52 & 53 Victor & Nellene Wyatt RC 5, Box 560 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33:451 Parcel 56 Michael & Janis Ri Rt 5, Box 593 Fort Pierce, Fl. 3 Parcel 60 Inez ~mtlton 1707 Angle Road' Fort Pierce, Fl. 334~0 Parcel 63 J~my & Barbara ~ vor~Ce Rt 5, Box 598A Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 68 James & Beverly T~ner P. O. Box 416 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33454 Parcel 69 Deborah W'~leand' 2400 S. OcaamDr, Villas I1, 811 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33449 Parcel 70 Rm & Sheila~cPhereon Rt 5, Box 620 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 71 Ford & Anita Sloan Re 5, Box 619 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 72 Edw & Jayne Stick 1801 Eucalyptus Avenue Fort Pierce, Fl. 33449 Parcel 75 SC Lucie Groves, Investments LCd P. O. Box 3779 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33448 County Roads SC Lucfe Co Admin Bld§ Road Right-of-Way, Rm 208k 2300 Virginia.Avenue Fort Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel 73 Oscar K. Johnson, ECal '9 S.E. llcb Avenue Pompano Beach, Fl. 33060 Parcel 76 Richard H. Davidson Rt 3, Box 630 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Canal No 20 Fort Pierce Farm Wtr Cen 131 1/2 N. 2nd Fort Pierce, Fl. 33450 Parcel 74 Missionary Faith Baptist Church, Inc. 4909 Silver Oak Drive Fort Pierce, Fl. 33450 Parcel 77 Okeechobee Land Corp. P. O. Box 367 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33454 Canal No 25 $o F1 Wtr Y%-mt Disc. Rt. 3, Box 1375 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 developmentS.of 'regional impact. 2. Developments of"~egional through a special go Permitting pursuant to the requirements of Section 380.06 of the Florida Statutes. 3. Section 380.06 of the Florida Statutes also incorporates a ProCedure whereby a determination can be made as to whether or not a Project is a development of regiona! impact. 4. Section 380.06 of the Florida Statutes authorizes local' governments to require developers binding letter of interpretation Affairs' to seek a determination as a development of regional impact. to submit an application for a to the Department of-CommUnity to whether or not a projec~ ts .5.. This Board desires to Chapte~ 380 of the Florida Statutes. ~-th-r~yh- ~assages are deleted; implement the provisions of M, 500 ~ passages are impact are required procedure TO BE DEVELOPMENTS OF R~GIONAL IMPACT TO PROtlIB~T FINAL ACTION BY ST. LUCIE COUNTY RELATING TO COI~pREBENSiVE LAND DEVELOPMENT PEP~ SEANCE OP UNT ITS IN R IL ST. REGARD TO SU LUCZE CO CH P FI ,UNT~ IS PLIER I~JECT __ NAL ACTION ON T~E ~,,,..,..___PARED TO CONCU Y PROJECT- p ~NT ORDER p -' , aOVrDING FO . a CONFLIC?Ia~ TO AND APPLICA~z ' o PROVISZONS- --.---LITY, FILING WITH ~I'~CTIVE DATE, _--.- _--~_r, uc,~U~T OF STAT, WHR~, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie following determinations: 1. section- 380.06 of the Florida Statutes defines ORDINANCE NO. 86-08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER ~"_'.~-~', PURSUANT TO SECTION 380 '~: ~'raTUTES, BY ADDI~me- ~--~;- -- .u~ ur 'z'Uu FLOR "~ ~uL~ V IDA IN CERTAIN I .~TA~_- ...... . TO ~QUI~ I~ING LE~E"" ........ ~ S~MIT ~ PR~E~S T~T ~ DET~IN~ NOW, T~EREFORE BE IT ORDA!NED by the Boa rd of Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PAR~ A. A~END~ENT OF CHAPTER 1-16 (PLANNING). County Chapter 1-16 (Planning) of the Code of Ordinances of:St. Lucie County, Florida, is hereby amended by adding Artice~V., Sections 1-16-70 - 1-16-73 as follows: are deleted; ~ Passages are · hreshhold, the ¢._,_._. - -_ _. -' : ..... ~ ' writing tQ c' t -=~ ~ ' --- ~;~' .... : .... '-: -- t-_ :-" - _ -_:U~ re that applicati°f]---f~o~ a binding lette,_ -_ h~ - . -_ .,,j _-' _ _~r~ocedure for P_~ocessing much be .s fo~ re, _::: · .., ,, '-: =_ -._----,_' 9oot, 500 - 2772 ~ Paesagee are ~ unit development~lp~ ~ a Dpt oval_ J~f) zDecia] exception 'V~r~'~b~°ugh-l~ssege8 ere ~le~ed; ~ pas~age~ are added. development__Permits issued by St._ Lucie Count.~~ ' '- '--'-] --' -" - '-- ' ':' "- ' '-' ': - .veIopment of' L aggreqated ~c3~e. lopment is at a Presumptive numeri~l_thr or up to twenty (20%) percent abov~ a numerical : eshhol~ ~uidel~nes and ~;tandards of Chapter 380 of the ~r shall ,be Z£ any portion of this ordinance Is for an~ declared to be unconstL~uttonal, lnoperatLve, holding shall nob affect Specl~l ac~s of the Plorl4a' unLnco=pora~ed areas of St. LucLe County an~"adop~ed January 1, 1969, County o=dtnances, and County reeolu ' ~io upe=seded ~ th/s .... -~ vraznance to the exten~ of PAR~co ~X3.'-' - COnfl~ct. the re~a/n/ng port/ohs o£ thL8 ordInanCe. Z£ this o=dlnance of any provlsLon the=eof shall be added. ~ Passages are deleted~ ~ PasSages are held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or Circumstance, such holding Shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. of off the vote on this PART D. PILING WZT~ T~ DSP~ OP STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith copy of this ordinance to the /3Ureau of Laws, of State, the Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. This ordt.nance she/! take effect upon receipt acknowledgement from the Office of the Secretary of this ordinance has been' filed in that office. PAST F. a£te.c 'mOtion and second, ~ol~ows: Chairman Hav.e. rt L* Fenn VLce-ChaimMn ,3'ira Commissioner a. l)a~e Tre.felnet Commissioner B. B. (~reen Aye A: e A: e ... The provisions of. ,':,bis ordinance ~ha/! be' lnCOrlX)re~ 'the Code of O:41nances o£ St. r..ucie CoUnty,' Florida, and ~he ~ "ordLnar~oe-may be changed aPpz'opriate voJ:d, mad the to "section-, "ar~.cle-, or otb 8e.~'~..lons of this orGLnance ma~ ~eaumbered or re~ette:ed to ac~omp~ish such Lntention;- hoveverf ~hat Parts /3 through G aba~ not be codifie4.' are ~eleted; 500 Passages are ~."~ Pis~ages PASSI~D AND D[~Lk ADOPTED th~s 6th day of May, ATTEST .- aOA~D OP ,1986. &dried.. '~ PasSages ere deJ. e t:ed; I~500 ~778 OF FORT PIERCE 8T OYANc~FF ~,.,~,4'.~u~: '. ......... :~e~. STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF 2571 EXECUTIVE CENTER BOB GRAHAM Governor CIRCLE, I ".:~. "/',. T ,' ..' -' .... ' ~,.':- · . . '.--~, ~.. FLORIDA ~ II P:~D I7 COMMUNITY AFFAIRS EAST . TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399 November 12, 1986 TO~,,~ LEWIS, JR. Secretary The Honorable Havert L. Fenn Chairman St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 33482-5652 Dear Commissioner Fenn: Pursuant to sec:ion 163.3184, Flori ~_~?m~.un~y Affairs hasl conducte~ a ~~a~t~, the Department ,,=n=s :o the St. Lucie h,,,~., ,__..= ~=~ ur =ne proposed a~nd- C ..... = u~uw~h Management Policy Plan. Our review indicate~ that the August 11, 1986, proposed plan amendments were generall consistent with the statutory requirements except as noted in the a tached comments. The Department believes the County should contin~[e to monitor the cumulative impact of such plan amendments to ensur~ the internal consistency of the adopted Growth Management Policy Plan pursuant __ _ .... ~ to s.163.3177(2), F~orida Statutes. Additional conments from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners have been attached for your review and possible use during the comprehensive plan amendment process. Once the adoption pr requests a copy of the am s.163.3187(3), Florid~ S~t OTHER )cess is complete, the Department ~nded comprehensive plan as required by ~tutes. --c0~ --DIS..R. --.~S. __~... -- A~. -- ~- -- PEAS. ~TTY. -- LIB. ~ REC. ~CLER~ --i~E ..~ ~ _ -- 911 --Mi. ADM. ~ ROAD ~COLL DATA ~ML CTHS. ~ V.A. ~SHE~. ~ D~.,,~ ' ' 7 ~., ,z~ - ~'~. · ~v. -- ~osQ. _ w~. EMERGENCy ~NAGEMENT ~ ~OLISi~ AND COMMUNITY Dr~,~LOP~ENT · RESOURC~ P~NNIN' ,i) ~NAGEMENT Mr. Havert L. Fenn November 12,. 1986 Page Two Please contact Mr. Lenwood Herron at 904/487-4545 if we can be of further assistance regarding these comments. RFK/lhr Sincerely, Robert F. Kessler, Chief Bureau of Local Resource Planning Enclosures cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council COMMENTS ON PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY PLAN Petition #6 The petition of William Carpenter to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential to medium residential appears to be inconsistent with the residential development and agricultural development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on pages 29 and 33. ~etition #7 The petition of Laura Hancock to amend the Fu from medium residentia~ ~ ...... ture Land Use · ~ ~u uu~mmercla~ general appears to bemap Inconsistent with the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. Petition The petition of Malcolm and Sylvia Collins,.to amendthe Future Land Use map from medium residential to commercial ~eneral appears to be inconsistent with the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. 'Petition #10 The,~petition of Terrance Mack to am ~rom low residential to ~ .... :_, end th~ FUture Land 'Use inconsistent ' _ _ c ...... ~~ genera~ aDD~ .... -- with th~ commer · -~---~~ ~ De Growth Mana~em ~ ..... ~lal development polici o ~ ent -~x ~lan on pa e 30 es f the g ~etition #12 The petition of Rose Baukmer to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential and commercial general to light industrial appears to be inconsistent with the residential development and Planindustrialon pagesdeVelopment29 and 32.Policies of the Growth Management Policy, Petition #13 The petition of Potter and Cleghorn to amen~ the Future Land ~ap from low ~d~tial t? commercial genera inconsistent With ~ne res' . .... 1 appears to l~entlal d~velo~ ........ be Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. ~,,,=,~u Policies of the Use Petition #14 Local approval of the H. F. Martek' Jr., project should be deferred until specific impact issues have been sufficiently resolved under the Development of Regional Impact Process pursuant to section 380.06 Florida Statutes It should be noted that this project exceeds ~0~e 1,000 d~elling units thresh- °id for St. Lucie County. Therefore, the applicant should contact the Department of Community Affairs, BUreau of Resource Management for guidance on the DRI process. Petition #17 The petition of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to amend the Future Land Use map from light industrial to medium residential appears to be inconsistent with the residen=ial development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. Petition #19 Local approval of the Minton. et al projec~ should be'~deferred until specific impact issues have been sufficiently resolved under the Development of Regional Impact process pursuant to section 380.06, ~10rida ~atutes' The a li the Department of Con%munitv A~__ ~ PP cant should contact ~ ~~, ~ureau o~ ~-- ment for guidance on the DRI process. ~ ~esource Manage- Petition %20 The petition of Dorothy L. Foster to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential to commercial general appears to be znconsistent with the commercial development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 30. Petition #21 Local approval of the Strazzul ~- Culverhouse et al -h~.,~ =_1~ ~rothers Compan ..... .... ~u ~ . Y, Inc. issues have been suff' · e_~er~rred until sec' ' f lClently reso-,,~ ..... P lflc lmDact ~=u unuer the Development of Regional Impact process pursuant to section 380.06, Flor~ ~tatute~.. The applicant should c da Community Affairs m,,~ ...... ontact the Dena~ .... the DRI Process , ~=~u oz ReSource Mana~em~T~n~ ~ 2 September 23, 1986 Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Resnurce Planning 2571 Executive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, FL 32301 Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Documents Dear Mr. Hook: Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes,-the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council reviewed the amendments to tho St. Lucie County land use element, at its regular meeting~ on SeptLember 22, 1986. The. following comments wore approved by Council for transmittal to th State Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Sections 163.3184(1)(c~ adoptionand (2), of Florida the document. Statutes, for consideration by the County prior to Evaluation The proposed amendments to the Land Use Element have been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Chaoter 163, Florida Statutes, Council,s review procedures, and Council,s adopted plans and policies. The following comments are offered as a result of that r~view. The proposed amendments are not in conflict or inconsistent with ado~ted Council plans or policies. Proposals to convert large tracts of agricultural lands to semi-urban uses (e.a.,)tem 20) are of Some concern, however, and should not be cons)dered prior to a comprehensive reevaluation of the County's goals and objectives for the entire area (see attached letter). Prior to the approval of the land use amendments, the proposed changes should be tested aaainst the St. Lucie County transportation model, to assure that the affected roadways can accommodate the more intens~ land uses. Council supports the efforts of St. Lucie County and the School Board of St. Lucie County (see the attached letter) in improving educational opportunities through-the use of d~dications and impact fees as discussed in the amendment request. 6~0 s, dizic highu)aV p.o. ar:.uer 396 stuorl, florida, 33a9511~;6 phone ~3OS) 28G.~313 Mr. Ralph K. Hook Page two September 23, 1986 The property described by Item I is close to the sites of the Treasure Coast Square Mall and the proposed Vista Plantation development in Martin County. The ability of U.S. 1 to accommodate additional traffic generatPd by Item 1 must be ensured. Adequate right-of-way should be dedicated for future expansion of the roadway network prior to thP development of this parcel. Considering "the proximity of Item 16 to the St. Lucie County Airport, the current land use designation of Lioht Industrial may be more appropriate than the proposed ResiOential land use designation. Consideration should be given to plans for future expansion of the airport facilities and increased levels of air traffic, as well as noise and safety'issues. The property described by Item 18 contains many ~acres of wetlands known as the Nonthern Savannas. ~ Care should be taken to minimize the impacts of any development on this environmentally sensitivj area. The property d~scribed by Item 20 is located on the border of Indian River County and is near the interface of the St. Johns River Water ~ana~ement District and South Florida Water Management District~ Since a development of such size in this location may have far reaching impacts, it is recommended that the land use amendment not be approved until both St. Lucie County and Indian River County a~ree that Such an action would not adversely affect the ability of ~ither county to realize · growth management and planning objectives. A primary concern is the relationship of the project with the existing urban/agricultural boundary. Development of the property as residential may create compatibility problems with existing agricultural development. Prior to considerino any change in land use, the County Should carefully conside~ its long range plans for this area, provision of infrastructure and services,, and the impacts of residential development on agricultural activities in the area. Additionally, a project of the size of this proposal would be a DRI. Final consideration of the proposed land use change should, perhaps, wait until a report and recommendations can be developed that evaluate regional issues. · Mr. Ralph K. Hook Page three September 23, 1986 If you need additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. .Sincerely', 'el N. Cary ' Execut!ve Director DNC:Ig Attachments ITEM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PROPOSED LAND USE AMENDMENTS AIRES 9.2 18.0 37.5 3.0 23.1 1.5 0.9 1.5 17.6 30.5 4.4 0.7 278.O 32.5 37.5 52.5 0.3 760.0 2.3 5,643.0 FOR __CURRENT DESIGNATI ON ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROPOSED DESIGNATION Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Medium Residential · Medium Commercial, General Residential, Low Semi -U rb an Residential, Low Commercial, General Residential, Low Agricultural, Producti ye Semi -Urban '~ Semi -Urban Industrial, Light Residential, Low Semi -Urban Residential, Low Agricultural, Productive Commercial, General Commercial, General Commercial, General Commercial, General Residential, Medium Commercial, General Commercial, Genera) Residential, Medium Commercial, Tourist Resid6~tial, Low Industrial, Light Commercial, General Residential, Low Industrial, Light Industrial, Light Residential, Medium Residential, Medium Industrial, Light Commercial, General Semi-Urban BOA'ii~ '9, OF COUNTY COMMISSIO;....'TRS 18~i~ 25th Street. Veto Beach. Florida 32960 ?elep~one {305) 567-8000 September 9, 1986 Mr. Peter G. Merritt Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 620 South Dixie Highway Stuart, FL 33495 Suncorn Telephone: 424-1011 RE: Land Use Amendme-~t for St. LUcie County - Falcon Ridge Dear Mr. Merritt: Indian River County staff has reviewed the petition of the Strazzulla Brothers Company, Inc. and John B. Culverhouse eta[ to amend the future land use maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Managementfor the aboveP°licYreferencedPlan frOmprojectAG (Agricult.ural) to-SU (Semi-Urban) are as follows: · At this time '~taff's comments i)one The proposed unit per project acre) land is use designation (SU Semi-Urban at not compatible with Indian River County's Land Use Plan (Agriculture at one unit per five acres). The existing parcels in the surrounding area are currently in agricultural production. Until such time that the necessary urban services become surrounding area infil!s with urban believes that this project would create ment and would be premature. available and th~ development, staff "leap-frog- develop- Staff has concerns regarding traffic impacts to local roads entering into Indian River County that could result as the project develops to its maximum buildout.capacity. Please be advised that the BOard of County Commissioners has not considered these comments, however, upon direction from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, staff will present this issue to the Board for their deliberation. We apPreciate the opportunity to comment have any questions or comments, please do not and hope that our concerns can be addressed in-the apPlicant.s response. If you me at 567-8000, ext. 247. hesitate to contact Sincerely, Art Challacombe - " Chief, Environmental Planning cc: Rober% Keating, AICP Tommy Thomas Mike Miller Jim Davis Richard Shearer Mike Orr Stan Boling 2571 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399 BOB GRAHAM Governor November 12, 1986 TOM LEWIS, JR. Secretary The Honorable Havert~LL. Fenn Chairman St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 33482-5652 DEVELOPN~ENT (~OORDINATOR ST. LUCIE CO. Dear Commissioner Fenn: - Purs,u&nt to section 163.3184; ~Ftorida Statutes, the Department of Community Affairs has conducted a review of the proposed amend- ments to the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan. Our review indic amendments were gener except as noted in th, the County should con plan amendments to en~ Growth Management Pol. Statutes. Additional Planning Council and ~ Commissioners~have be~ during the comprehens: lted that the August 11, 1986, proposed plan ~lly'consistent with the statutory requirements attached comments. The Department believes inue to monitor the cumulative impact of such ~ure the internal consistency of the adopted .cy Plan pursuant to s.163.3177(2), Florida comments from the Treasure Coast Regional .he Indian River County Board of County ~n attached for your review and possible use ve plan amendment process. Once the adoptio~ process is complete, the Department requests a copy of the amended comprehensive plan as required by s.163.3187(3), F!orida Statutes. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT · HOUSINC, AND COMMUNITY Dr~,F LOPMENT · RESOURCE PLANNIN~ MANAGEMENT Mr. Havert L. Fenn November 12, 1986 Page Two Please contact Mr. Lenwood Herron at 904/487-4545~if we can be of further assistance regarding these comments. RFK/lhr Sincerely, .~.:>,.,-,'-, ~ ,.,, ,. :.. Robert F. Kessler, Chief Bureau of Local Resource Planning Enclosures cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council COMMENTS ON PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY PLAN Petition #6 The petition of William Carpenter to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential to medium residential appears to be inconsistent with the residential development and agricultural development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on pages 29 and 33. Petition #7 The petition of Laura Hancock to amend the Future Land Use map from medium residential, to commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. Petition #8 The petition of Malcolm and Sylvia Collins to amend the'Future Land Use map from medium residential to commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. Petition #10 The petition of Terrance Mack to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential to commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the commercial development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 30. Petition #12 The petition of Rose Baukmer to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential and commercial general to light industrial appears to be inconsistent with the residential development and industrial development policies of the Growth Management Pol%cy Plan on pages~29 and 32. Petition #13 The petition of Potter and Cleghorn tO amend the Future Land Use map from low residential to commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the residential development polities of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. Petition #14 Local approval of the H. F. Martek, Jr., project should be deferred until specific impact issues have been sufficiently resolved under the Development of Regional Impact Process pursuant to section 380.06, Florida Statutes. It should be noted that this project exceeds 80% of the 1,000 dwelling units thresh- old for St. Lucie County. Therefore, the applicant should contact the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Resource Management for guidance on the DRI process. Petition #17 The petition of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to amend the Future Land Use map from light industrial to medium residential appears to be inconsistent with the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. Petition #19 ~'- ' .... Local approval of the Minton. et al project should be deferred until specific impact issues have been sufficiently resolved under the Development of Regional Impact process pursuant to section 380.06, Florida Statutes. The applicant should contact the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Resource Manage- ment for guidance on the DRI process. Petition %20 The petition of Dorothy L. ~Foster to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential ~o commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the commercial development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 30. Petition #21 Local approval of the Strazzu!la Brothers Company, Inc., and'JJohn B. Culverhouse et al should be deferred until specific impact issues have been sufficiently resolved under the Development of Regional Impact process pursuant to section 380.06, Florida Statutes..The applicant should contact the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Resource Management for guidance on the DRI process. st. luci¢ September 23, 1986 Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Resource Planning 2571 Executive Centpr Circle, East Tallahassee, FL 32301 Subject: Local Government Comprehensive P|an Documents Dear Mr. Hook: Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Develooment Regulation Act, Chapter 163, ~Florida ~Statutes,~the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council reviewed the amendments ~o the St. Lucie County land use element at its regular meeting on September"22, 1986. The following comments were approved by Council for transmittal to the State Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Sections 163.3184(1)(c) and (2), Florida Statutes, for consideration by the County prior to adoption of thedocument. Evaluation The proposed amendments to the Land Use Element have been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Chaoter 163, Florida Statutes, Council's review procedures,, and Council's adopted plans_ and policies. The following comments are offered as a result of that r~view. The proposed amendments are not in conflict or incbnsistent with adopted Council plans or policies. Proposals to convert large tracts of agricultural lands to semi-urban uses (e.a., Item 20) are of some concern, however, and should not be considered prior to a comprehensive reevaluation of the County's goals and objectives for the entire area (see attached letter). Prior to the approval of the land use amendments, the proposed changes should be tested aaainst the St. Lucie County transportation model, to assure that the affected roadways can accommodate the more intense land uses. Council supports the efforts of St. Lucie County a~d the School Board of S~. Lucie County (see the attached letter) in imoroving educational opportunities through the use of d~dications and impact fees as discussed in the amendment request. Mr. Ralph K. Hook Page two September 23, 1986 The property described by Item 1 is close to the sites of the Treasure Coast Square Mall and the proposed Vista Plantation development in Martin County. The ability of U.S. 1 to accommodate additional traffic generated by Item 1 must be ensured. Adequate right-of-way should be dedicated for future expansion of the roadway,-network prior to the development of this parcel. Considering the proximity of Item 16 to the St. Lucie County Airport, the current land use designation of LiQht Industrial may be more appropriate than the proposed Residential land use designation. Consideration should be given to'plans for future expansion of the airport facilities and increased levels of air traffic, as well as noise and safety issues. _~ The property described by Item 18 contains many acre~' of wetlands known as the Nor£hern Savannas. Care should be taken to minimize the impacts of any development on this environment'ally sensitive area. The property described by Item 20 is located on the border of Indian River County and is near the interface of the St. Johns River Water Management District and South Florida Water Management District. Since a development of such size in this location may have far reaching impacts, it is recommended that the land use amendment not be approved until both St. Lucie County and Indian River-County agree that such an action would not adversely affect the ability of ~ither county to realize growth management and planning objectives. A primary concern is the relationship of the project with the existing urban/agricultural boundary. Development of the property as residential may create compatibility problems with existing agricultural development. Prior to considering any chanoe in land use, the County should carefully consider its long range plans fo~ this area, provision of infrastructure and services, and the 'impacts of residential development on agricultural activities in the area. Additionally, a project of the size of this proposal would be a DRI. Final consideration of the proposed land use change should, perhaps, wait until a report and recommendations can be developed that evaluate regional issues. Mr. Ralph K. Hook Page three September 23, 1986 If you need additional information or have any questions please do not hesitate to call me. .Sincerely~ Danlef N. Cary Executive Director DMC:lg AttaChments ITEM PROPOSED ACRES ~ZAND USE AMENDMENTS FOR CURRENT DESIGNATION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROPOSED DESIGNATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9.2 18.0 37.5 3.0 23.1 1.5 0.9 1.5 17.6 30.5 4.4 0.7 278.0 32.. 5 37.5 52.5 0.3 760.0 2.3 5,643.0 Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential,- Low Residential, Medium Residential, Medium Commercial, General Residential, Low Semi -Urban Residential, Low Commercial, General Residential, Low Agricultural, Productive Semi -Urban 'Semi ,Ur'U an .... Industrial, Light Residential, Low Semi-Urban Residential, Low .Agricultural, Productive Commercial, General Commercial, General Commercial, General Commercial, General Residential, Medium Commercial, General Commercial, General Residential', Medium Commercial,'Tourist Residential, Low Industrial, Light Commercial, General Residential, Low Industrial, Light Industrial, Light Res-idential, Medium Residential, Medium Industrial, Light Commercial, General Semi-Urban Bf RD OF COUNTY COMMISS/-"¥ERS 1840 25th Street. Vero Beach, Florida ;~z~960 Telephone ($05) 567-8000 3eptember 9, 1986 Mr. Peter G. Merritt Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 620 South Dixie Highway Stuart, FL 33495 Suncom Telephone: 424-1011 RE: Land Use Amendment fo/- St. Lucie '~'"'- "~.-i-.;._~ County - Falcon Ridge Dear Mr. Merritt- Indian River County staff has reviewed the petition of the Strazzulla Brothers Company, Inc. and John B. Culverhouse etal to amend the future land use maps of the St. "-Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural) to SU (Semi-Urban) for the above referenced project. At this time staff's co~ents are as follows: !) The proposed project land use designation (SU Semi-Urban at one unit per acre) is not compatible with Indian River County's Land Use Plan (Agriculture at one unit per five acres). The existing parcels in the surrounding area are currently in agricultural production. Until such time that the necessary urban services become available and th~ surrounding area infills with urban development, staff believes that this project would create "leap-frog- develop- ment'and would be ~premature. - ........... 2) Staff has concerns regarding traffic impacts to local roads entering into Indian River County that could result as the pro]ect develops to its maximum buildout.capacity. Please be advised that the Board of County Commissioners has not considered these comments, however, upon direction from the Treasure CoAst Regional Planning Council, staff will pres6nt this issue to the Board for their deliberation. We appreciate the opportunity to comment and hope that our concerns can be addressed in the applicant's response. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at 567-8000, ext. 247. Sincerely, ._. Art Challacombe Chief, Environmental Planning cc: Rober% Keating, AICP Tonuny Thomas Jim Davis Mike Orr Mike Miller Richard Shearer Stan Boling THURSDAY AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 18, 1986 7:00 P.M. Petition of H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural Productive) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) for the following described property: South 1/2 of Sec. 33, T. 34S; R 57 E~, ~,. Lucle' C9.unt¥~ FL.~ les~.,ganals C20 & C25, lying~ East of Fla. Turnpike & West of 1-95, and all easements thereof,. To~ether w~th t~t' part o.f .the S~...1/.4. l~ng., souSbwes~erly of I95 Right-of-Way, less to SFWMD,-Sec. 34, T 34, R 39. '~ (Location: North side of Angle Road between 1-95 and Florida Turnpike, north of Canal C-25.) Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board of County Commissioners at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /s/ Jim Minix, Chairman dcm H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. 925 N.E. Commercial street Jensen Beach, FI. 33457 A Lillian E. Luntta 125 Ocean Mayan Towers Palm Beach, Shores, FI. 33404 -PPOPERTY OWNERS IN PETITIONED OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIED A Dan Biele, Etal 3300 NE 36th St. Apt 806 Ft Lauderdale, Fl. 33308 Parcel 1 & 2 H. J. Ross Assoc., Inc. 120 Leucadendra Dr. Coral Gables,'F1. 33156 Parcel 3 Golden Ponds St Lucie Assoc 944 E. Ocean~Blvd Suite 250 Bi F Stuart, Fi. 33494 Avon Manor, V.1Blk A, Lot 1 Grant &Opan Purlee 1215 E. Joy Ln. Fort Pierce, FI. 33451 Lot 2 Wm. D. Lanier, Etal P. O. Box 475 Naples, Fl. 33939 Lot 27 : Raymond & Mary Brown, Etal 1212 W. Joy Lane Fort Pierce, Fi 33450 Lot 28 Robert & Althea Ruark, Etal P. O. Box 1991 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33454 Blk B, Lot 1 Franklin & Winifred Maddox Rt 5, Box 700 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33451 Lot 2 Chas & Eileen Wise 1215 W. Joy Lane Fort Pierce, FI. 33451 Lot 3 Victor & Martha Bryan, Etal P. O. Box 475 Naples, Fl. 33939 Lot 4 Ava Chucta P. O. Box 3387 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33448 Avon Manor, V. 2 Blk B Lot 50 Katherine Shuler C/O Fontenelle Hair Designers 2303 N. US #1 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33450 Parcels 5 Jos. A. Ierovolino 7620 S. W. 168th Street Miami, Fi 33157 Avon Manor, V2 Blk B, Lot 51 John & Lillian Loy 1214 E. Joy Lane Fort Pierce, Fi. 33451 Parcel 6 Frank & Nettie Creta 1655 Flat Bush Ave, Apt B 506 Brooklyn, N. Y. 11210 Parcel 4, 67 State of Florida R~ R/w 780 S.W. 24th Street Parcel 7 Am & Corinne Richardson 4522 Vickie Ct. Evans, Ga. 30809 Parcel 8 & 9,10,11,13,14,28 Corinne Richardson, Etal 28 W. Flagler St., Suite 400 Miami, FI. 33130 __~ farcel 12 P~lri~'el qMarcel 15 ~ Chas & Evelyn Ioell P. O. Box 408 Shelter Hgts, N. Y. 11965 Frank Simmonds 1806 Shore Blvd. Toms River, N. J. 08753 Parcel 16 & 17 Margaret Tiberio 1530 S. Broad Street Philadelphia, Pa. 19146 Parcel 18 & 19 Columbus & Esther Pelosi 202 Bradford Road Marlton, No J. Parcel 20 Robert L. Sharp P. O. Box 84413 Seattle, Wa. 98124 Parcel 21 Emelia Sturgis 812 Ross Street Toms River, N. J. 08753 Parcel 22 & 23 Bartholomew & Anita Veloce Emerald Apt Bldg, #3 958 President Avenue Toms River, N. J. 08753 Parcel 24, 25, 26 Joan Rotondella 1326 SE Concha Street Port St Lucie, Fi. 33452 Parcel 27 Edmund & Adelaide Luciano 461N. 13th Street Newark, N. J. 07107 Parcel 29 Margaret Mandy 15 New Brunswick Avenue Lavallette, N. J. 08735 Parcel 30 Albert & Ella GaJauskas 2424 S. Fed. Hwy, Apt 209 Boynton Beach, Fi. 33435 Parcel 31 & 33 John G. Caruso, Jr. 313 Fourth Street Union City, N. J. 07087 Parcel 32 Valentino & Louise Bornelli 7 Brooklyn Avenue Lavallette, N. J. 08735 Parcel 34 Virgilia F. Santoro 3461 NE 17th Way Ft. Lauderdale, Fi. 33334 Parcel 35 Phyllis Byron 18-05 215th Street Bayside, N. Y. 11360 Parcel 36 Alvin & Patricia Christopher 104 N. 41st Street Fort Pierce, Fi. 33450 Parcel 37 Jill Anker 211-10 18th Avenue Bayside, N. Y. 11360 Parcel 38, 40,42,44 Patricia Mitchell 3102 Live Oak Lane Fort Pierce, FI. 33482 Parcel 39 & 41, 43, 45 Edw & Janith Holmes 2792 Northlake Blvd Palm Beach Gardens, Fl. 33410 Parcel 46 U.S. Attorney!s Office Southern District of Florida 155 S. Main Avenue Miami, Fi. 33131 Attn: Lands Div/Bob Senior Parcel 47 Joseph & Julia Dousa 6410 Marietta. Avenue Baltimore, Md. 21214 ..... Marcel 48 Joe Selph Rt 5, Box 599 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Larcel 49 Thomas & Linda Selph Rt 5, Box 598 Fort Pierce, FI. 33451 Parcel 50 Chas R. Sexton, Etal P. O. Box 1208 Vero Beach, Fl. 32960 Parcel 51 & 64 Minnie ~.>~MR~tl>$yatt Rt 7, Box 553 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33451 Parcel 52 & 53 Victor & Nellene Wyatt Rt 5, Box 560 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 54 Lynn & Marion Myers ~38Q.Johnston Rd. Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 55 Marcus V. Combs, Jr. 1297 E. David Rd. Kette~ing~ 0~f45429 Parcel 56 Michael & Janis Riley Rt 5, Box 593 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33450 Parcel 57 & 58 Thomas & Donna Buchanon Rt 5, Box 591 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33450 Parcel 59 Mark & Therese Hamilton 1703 Angle Road Fort Pierce, Fl. 33450 Parcel 60 Inez Hamilton 1707 Angle Road Fort Pierce, Fl. 33450 Parcel 61 Emil & Patricia Gollnick Rt 5, Box 597 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 62 James & Beverly Favorite Rt 5, Box 598A Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 63 Jimmy & Barbara Favorite Rt 5, Box 598A Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 6B Oscar Johnson, Etal 9 S. E. llth Avenue Pompano Beach, Fi. 33060 Parcel 66 Henry E. Wolfe 200 SE First St, Ste 902 Miami, Fi. 33131 Parcel 68 James & Beverly Tyner P. O. Box 416 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33454 Parcel 69 Deborah Wieand 2400 S. Ocean Dr, Villas 11, 811 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33449 Parcel 70 Wm & Sheila McPherson Rt 5, Box 620 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33451 Parcel 71 Ford & Anita Sloan Rt 5, Box 619 Fort Pierce, Fl. 33451 Parcel 72 Edw & Jayne Stick 9625Ang!~RDad Ft. Pierce,.FL ~3345i -.~ ~ =~arcel 73 Oscar K. Johnson, Etal 9 S.E. llth Avenue Pompano Beach, Fi. 33060 .~ _arcel 74 i~P Missionary Faith Baptist Church, Inc. 4909 Silver Oak Drive Fort Pierce, Fi. 33450 Parcel 75 St Lucie Groves, Investments, Ltd P. O. Box 3779 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33448 Parcel 76 Richard H. Davidson Rt 3, Box 630 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33451 Parcel 77 Okeechobee Land Corp. P. O. Box 367 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33454 County Roads St Lucie Co Admin Bldg Road Right-of-Way, Rm 208A 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Fi. 33482 Canal No 20 Fort Pierce Farm Wtr Cen Dist. 131 1/2 N. 2nd St. Fort Pierce, Fi. 33450 Canal No 25 So Fi Wtr Mgmt Dist. Rt. 3, Box 1375 Fort Pierce, Fi. 33451 BOARD OF COUNTY D V LOPM NT COMMI SSION£RS C O0 R D ! NATO R J. GARY AMENT December 8, 1986 In compliance with the provisions of the Florida Statutes, you are hereby advised that H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St~. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural Productive) to RL (Low Density Residential Developmeant) for the following described property: .South 1,/2 of Sec. 33, T. ~4S, R 39,E~ St. T_.ucle. Co,unt~? FL,. less ca~,als ,,. _ ,C20 & C2~., lyir~.East of Fla. Turnpike & W,est 'of,,Ir9,5: an~., all easements ~ the~,eo.£: Tozether with t_h_.at' Dart o.f .~he SW .1/4 1.vinE southwesterly I95 Right-o£-Way~ less to SFWMD~ 'Sec. 34; T 34, R 39.,-'.. ' ~~ ~or~h s'i~-e--of Angle RoAd 6etw'een 'Y-95 anti'Florida Turnpike, north of Canal C-25.) A public hearin§ on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, December 18, 1986, in Room 101, St. Lucie County Admin- istration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board of County Commissioners at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. If you should have any questions, additional information may be obtained by calling Area Code 305, 466-1100, Extension 359. of Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA J~ Minix, Chairman HAVERT L FENN, District No. I · E. E. GREEN, District No. 2 · :lACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, Distri,ct No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5 Counly Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-t 100 Coordinator: Ext. 398 ® Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317 THE NEWS TRIBUNE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared James J. McMillen o~' Kathleen K. LeClair, who on oath says that he/she is Publisher, Publisher's Secretary of The News Tribune, a daily newspaper published at Fort Pierce in St. Lucie County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a.. no Z J-ce .................. in the matter of...J~a.n.d..uae..change. .................... was published in said newspaper in the issues of. ......... 12/9/86 ~ Affiant further says that the sa d News Tribuh~ is a newspa published aL Fo~-t ~ierce. in said St. Lucie County. Florida and that the sai~nnews a er has heretofore been continuously nublished ;, ~.;'~ ..... pap ........ oL. t. ucze uounty. Florida. each day and has been entered as second class mai] matter at the post office in ForL NOTICE' OF CHANGE.. ND USI ,,_~, The St- Lu~ie County 8oa~ of County Commis~m~l I~o~oe~ lo chan~ " BOARD 0~ ~ ~ C, JOOE GLOVES, INC: ' Pierce. in said St. Lucle County, Florida. for a period of one year next pre- i,~. way g~. ee~ng the first publication of the at~ch~ copy of advertisement: and affiant ~rth ...... thathe~sneitherpaidnorpromisadany ....... fi ...... ~ .... tion any ~sco~nt. rebate, commission or refund for ~e ~urposa of securing ~s advertisement for ~blica~ion in the said newspaper. ~ Sworn te and subscri~d before me (S~L* "* ~~ ' · · ~ ..... ~'r ' ........ ~ ...... ~'~ I ~'' Fr~RL(towOe~wR~idential)toCGiTour~lCommer~l) I~ F~ RL (L~ DO~ R~I) K CG (~I'~B m IL (~t ~al); I~ a~flg the ~_~_~S~. ~c~ ~nW G~ Ma~aoe~f P~y P~ ~ add a ~ ~flc *S~ P~y S8c~ .... :' :~ ~~~~ of Pu~ ~ ~ ~ and ~ ~en~g Chapt~ 4 ~ p STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCI~ Before the undersigned authority persona/dy appeared James J. McMillen or Kathleen K. LeClair. who on oath says that he/she is Publisher, Publisher's Secretary of The News Tribune. a daily newspaper published at Fort Pierce in St. Lucid County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a .... .~..O. ~ .~..C..e ................. in the matter of....c..h.~..n.g.e...~..1..a.p.d....u..s.e. ............... was published in said newspaper in the issues of ......... .................. ! ~, ./.Lg[ ~ fi ................................ NOTICE' OF CHANGE OF LAND USE The SIL Luci~ C°Unly .BolI~I of Counly Commis~ol~m Pr~o~I~ to chaise lhe us~ of land wt~,~~hl ~jl IhOwn ~ ~ ,.-101, $~. Lmgi~emttyAdmlatltl~lm BeiMieg, ;2~0~vbgat~ Avem~ Ft. ' - .- . , . - SO~O OFC~( - ,' J7, 198 ~°rtP~erc~'msam~t'Luc~eC°un~y'Flgrida.'andthatthesaidnewsp~perhas I~ ~ w~ofs~b:S:Y - . ' ] , ,~to;~[e~ncontmu~uslypubh~hedmsa~dSt. Luc~eCounty Florida each 1~ ~, ~E~ ?. an~ nas ~n enter~a as secona class mad matter at the post off ce nFor[ ~ ~ Fmm~LiL~D~~m~16~~l;~t~ ~':erce. m smd SL LuBe County, Florida. for a peri~ of one year next nr~ ~ w~ Ro~. [~:pg the first publ/catio~ of the ~ttached copy of advertisement: and aff~nt 1 ~ ~' ~ ~,~ ~ ' ~ - r~r:ner ~ys that he has nmther prod nor promlsc~ any person, firm or corpora- I ~' From RL{~ Di~R~on~J~CG ~on any discour L. rebate commission or refund for the ~urnose of secur n,, I - ~ way Ro~. , ]:~sad['ert~sementf~rpu~licationinthesa~dnewspaper.' '' ~ l; :~e Wm, E.C~T~ ' ' . I~wo~toandsubscmbedbeforeme ~ ~ F~RLiL~D~R~n~MRMIM~mD~R~;~~Sun~ / ' I '= ~s~A,.~. ~:- -his ~" a r ~ect / ' / /// I~ ~.~- 1986 ~'/U'// ~'~/~ I;~. ~al~~s L~.~/; .............. ~'' ', .......... I ~/' · ~ ~- ~ l ' ~ ~f~'~~'. ,, ~,~ ~ ~' ../, /,- ~ .. _-,..I "~.K.~J~: ' ~ .,,'~L~..L ...... , ' , , ' : ,~ ~ Fr~RLlL~w~idan~lJtoCGJTou~tCommerc~ll;l~attheNo~eastc~ THURSDAY, DECEM'BER18, 1986 J. rt. From SU ISemi U~} I~ RL (Low Dm'41p/ReJtdlm~,atl; ~ ~ng me Seth ~e ~ O~ A~ue, op~o~m eE~N ff ~ BOARD OF COUN~ to ~ ~ SL ~ ~ G ro~h Mafla~ment Po~cy P~n ~n ~ ~OOW ~ SC~ B~rd a~ ~er ~ ~ end amending Aped PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA MINUTES MEETING OF DECEMBER 10, 1986 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman J. Pi Terpenin§, J. J. Sciturro, Robert Carman, Mabel Fawsett, Patri~ia Ferrick, Patricia King. BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Peggy Harris, Mabel Fawsett, William' Myers (all absences were excused). OTHERS PRESENT: Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney, Dennis Murphy, Planner; Gary Schindler, Planning Ad~instrator; Dolores Messer, Secretary. TAPE(S): 1, 2, 3, 4 DATE OF HEARING: 12/10/86 PAGE: 1 INVOCATION: The Invocation was given by Joseph Sciturro. PUBLIC HEARING: Petition of H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. (by Agent: Bruce R. Abernethy, Jr.) to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural Productive) to RL (-LOw Density Residential Development) located on the north side of Angle Road between 1-95 and'the Florida Turnpike (north of Canal C-25). Joe Martek, representing the petition, explained that the property encompasses 280 acres on which they propose to build 950 attached housing units, with seven units per building, all one level. He mentioned the natural borders of 1-95, the Florida Turnpike, and canals providing security. He listed some of the planned amenities. Chairman Terpening asked if anyone was present to speak in favor or in opposition of the petition. There were none. He then closed the public portion of the hearing. Mr. Murphy, representing Staff, related Dept. of~Community Affairs comments that local approval of the Martek project should be deferred until specific impact issues have been sufficiently resolved under the DRI impact process pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. It should be noted that this project exceeds 80% of the 1,000 dwelling unit threshold for St~ Lucie County, therefore the applicant should contact DCA Bureau of Resource Management for guidance in the DRI process. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council had no direct references to this petition. County Staff has no objection to the proposed peti- tion. Mr. Sciturro made a motion that this petition be approved finding it consistent with the GMPP. Mr. Carman seconded the motion, and upon roll call, the Board unanimously voted in favor of the motion. The pettion-will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval finding it consistent with the GMPP. AGENDA - LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 10, 1986 7:00 P.M. Petition of H.F. Martek, Jr., Inc. to amend the future land use classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural Productive) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) for the following described property: .. South 1/.2 of Sec. 33, T. ~S, .R 39_E, S~. ,Lucle, Co,unt , ,FL,. less ca~, ~ls ,, C20 & C25, lyin~ Eas~ .of Fla. _Tu?nplke &, Wes~ 'o~,~-$5i an~,,all easements ..thereof. To~ether w~th t~' p~rt ,o~ The S,~ ,1/4 l~n~ sou.~hwesterly of I95 Ri~t-0frWa~,..less to ~FWMD~ 'Sec.. (Location: North side of Angle Road between 1-95 and Florida Turnpike, north of Canal C-25.) Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Local Planning Agency at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners. dcm BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION6RS November 17, 1986 D V LOPM NT COORDINATOR. J. GARY AMENT In compliance with the provisions of Florida Statutes, you are hereby advised that H.F. Martek, Jr., Inc. has petitioned the Local Planning Agency to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the. St. Lucie Cuonty Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural Productive) to RL (Low Density Residential Develop- ment) for the following described property: ..South !/2 of Se~. 33, T. 34S, R ~9 E, St. Lucie. Co,unt~ FL..,~ess canals ,. , C20 & C25, lyinK East of ~.. ~.TU~. p~ke &. west 'of 1-95, and all easements .thereof.-To~ether with tba~'par~ of .the SW..1/_4_.lyinE sou~wg.s~erly of I9~ Right-of-Way, %gss to SFWMDn]S_ec~_34~ T~. R 39.. (Location: 'N6rth side of Angle Road between 1-95 an~ ~'±orz~a Turnpike, north of Canal C-25.) A public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M. on Wednesday, December 10, 1986, in Room 101, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Local Planning Agency at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. If you have any questions, additional information may be obtained by calling Area Code 305, 466-1100, Extension 359. Sincerely, LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA J. P. Terpen~ng, Chairman dcm HAVERT L FENN, District No. I · E. E. GREEN, District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No.~3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5 County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia AvenUe · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-t t00 Coordinator: Ext. 398 · Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: EXt. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317 ~ THE NEWS TRIBUNE ......................... Before si~ed authority ~rso~Uy appeare :m James J. McMillen or Kathleen K LeClair, who on oa~ ~ says that he/she is Publisher, Pu~Hsher's Secretary~o ~ The News Tribune a daily newspaner ubl'shed at For ~ Pierce in St. Luci~ County, Flori~; tgat ~he attache copy of advertisement beinga notice in the matter of Change of land use TUESDAY, A. _JUNE R, LL, m,Z, .~ ~ rr°m RL CLm~ DI~rW R~dM~I~t) t~ ~.~ (Gen~~ B. .From RLfL~ ~ R~i) m C was published in said newspaper in the issues of ........ ............ ~W. 18/86 Affia Fort day second class mail matLer at the Pierce, in ~nty Florida · ~u~r~er~hfi. first pvbJica~ion of the' attache~ fc~ ~J:~e_r~(~d ot one yea .... t pre thls ad vert~sement for publica tion in the s . , (SEAL} ~'~'c~''''i''''~'' ~' ....... F'. _LAuI~I ,. HAHCO~K ~~~,~',!! .............. :.-:~. ~.-- ~, ~ ~,-~ Q. ~o..t ,c.o,?_,,_~.t ~"'"'"~'"'~""~'"""~-:~'~-.~,co~.~.,,. ~ea.d., ~.,' v,, eou..,. - ' :¥=. !':: ',3,:5: f~t '"'"~mmuermitYfle~idential)tOCGlG ~ L_E~t__m'_ South 25m St.et. ene~ Comme~a~l: Iocato~ .... '{: ' ~7'~'~' :':' ' .... H. ~''u~,HCEIIOC#: . rom RL(Low Denlity R;a~ent~l) to CTfTour~t ' i. JOHN CNUit©H: · ,~..~,~ [;$ Y' '"'-N--DA-:1 j....,~, i:] 10, K · ROII'°fFr°mRockSU~'R°ad(seLmIlji~llllK~lllUrban) to RL (LOw Density Re~Jdenflal}-, lor..ate~ along. ~. SOuth From efl~lLow .Dankly R -..m~mtM_) and CGlGenerM Comme~O~ll ~ I~ M . ' · , Jr., IMC,4 ,~ lumpike. ~ty ~miden~l): located along I N. IIINT..O.,N. SU.N. INCglNOIANOLA eliOVES {NO.3 -' From SUIS - -. .m,,,.,rb..to,,.,~.,,.th. to.,,, lo,.,., .t .BOARD .of. COUNTY COMMISSIONI'~. c.u - Q...B~-~ w. mm~o,, .~ ~ · ......... r .r?l~. SUlSefrd UH:A~ml to IL(Light Ind~ - ' DOROTHY L. irOST~i~ ....... From RLILoW Den~ty I;~le~tlal; tO CG North Of Indfio Re~ IGenera! Comme~ciM). t,,;,~ tO amend me St. LocieCo~n--- _=L_='~?..NTYCOMIIISSiONEIIS - Policiei" cont ty u,owm Management PoGc plans Ihafl be I PETITION ,,,*tm ~. to amend Ind other FO,~ P,erce. SL Luc,e Court y. ~lo~,da COU~T~ OF ST. Before LSe undersized ~L~o~JL~ pe~son~ James J. McMillen or Kathleen K. LeClair, who on oath says that he/she is Pub~sher, Publisher's SecreteW of The News Tribune, a daily newspaper published at Fort Pierce in St. Lucie County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a.. ~g~.~.~....: .............. in the matter of...~.g~..9.~...~..~.~ ............... was published in said newspaper in the issues of. ......... 12/1/86 Agfiant ~rther says that the said News Tribune is a newspaper publlsh~ Fort Pierce, in said St, Lucie County Florida. and ~hat the ~ld newsna~r ~ heretofo~ b~n cont nuously published in said S~. Lucle County. Flo~i~ each day and has been en~r~ as s~ond c ass mail mater at the p~t office in Fort Pierce, in sa~d SL Lucie County. F orida, for a peri~ of one year next ceding the first publication of the at~ached copy of advertisement: and ~rther says that he has neither paid nor promised any ~rson, firm or corpora. tlon any ~iscount. reba~, corem ss on or refund for ~he purple of t~s advertisement for pub~cation in the said ne~s~r. Sworn ~ and subscri~d beJore me Thi- 10th Dec. ~ ............. day of ........... 1986 · iSEAL; ~' Not~ry Public~; NOTICE OF Agency proposes to TU DAY, o CG (GeneraJ 9, 14 Norh~a~t comer of ~ , Density Re~ide~ti~) ~o CGfC. Gm~ral CG(General RM[Me~Jum Den~i~ Residential} to CG(General Commerciali; 10cared ~ 25tl -~GfGenera! MOCK: From RL(Low Dens/ty R~ider~al) to JOHN CHURCH: CTiTour~s~ Commerciatj; located From RL(Low Density Residential) to RM (Medium Densit · 420 feet Sou~h of Banyon Road. the Not~J~a~t WEDNESDAy, DECEMBER J~, PT. PIERCE 30 WEST: ~.- ~f~oc~URISoade~l., Urban)to RL ,L~ ' ' N OF THE BOARD OF COUN~ COMM~NE~ P~N OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY C to ~ t~ St, Luc~ Coun~ G~ .... ~NE~ ' ~ ~raPr~areof r . . n Pu~l~ ~h~ Po ~a o~r ts anc UNITED STATES ' ,t~,' OUTHERN DI ICT OF FLORIDA TRACT NOS. 102 & 102E" /:f~/'~:' Plaintiff, STATI AND ! et. a ~A3~ ~ the United State~ [aintiff of property which is unimproved and described in the Complaint filed herein, and it appearing that plaintiff' is entitled to possession of the said property, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all defendants to this action and all persons in possession or control of day of property shall surrender possession and control to plaintiff, to the extent of the estate being condemned as of /~ ~;/~4- , provided that a copy of this Order shall be served upon all persons in possession of'said property forthwith. THUS DONE AND SIGNED AT ~/g~4~~lorida, this ~_ · UNITE~TATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: Peter Koste, AUSA Dan Biele and Lawrence D. Biele State of Florida Tax Collector, St. Lucie County UNITED STATES OF AME VS o FILED b'F D.C. t,/IA¥ 3 01985 ! Plaintiff, NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 1.76 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN THE COUNTY OF ST. L.rT~ STATE OF FLORIDA and D AN AN BIELE D LAWRENCE D. BIELE, TRUSTEES, et. al., and UNKNOWN OWNERS, ORDER FOR DELIVERY OF POSSESSIbN THIS ACTION coming upon written motion of the United States of America for an Order for the surrender to plaintiff of possession of property which is unimproved and described in the Complaint filed herein, and it appearing that plaintiff is entitled to possession of the said property, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all defendants to this action and all persons in possession or control of property shall surrender possession and control to plaintiff, to the extent of the estate being condemned as of /~ ~;/~4- , provided that a copy of this Order shall be served upon all persons in possession of said property forthwith. day of /~ , 1985. CC: ~3N ~/~ ISTRICT JUDGE Peter Koste, AUSA Dan Biele and Lawrence D. Biele State of Florida Tax Collector, St. Lucie County UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, VS o 1.76 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN THE COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE, STATE OF FLORIDA, and DAN BIELE AND LAWRENCE D. BIELE, TRUSTEES, et. al., and UNKNOWN OWNERS, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TRACT NOS. I02 & 102E TO: NOTICE OF CONDEMNATION ALL PARTIES NAMED IN THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE A You are hereby notified that a Complaint in Condemnation has been filed in the office of the clerk of the above named Court in an action tO condemn an interest in and to certain property for public use. The land is being taken pursuant to the Act of Congress approved February 26, 193i, (46 Stat. 1421, 40 U.S.C. S258a), and acts supplementary thereto and amendatory thereof, and under the further authority of the Act of Congress approved August-1, 1888 (25 Stat. 357, 40 U.S.C. 257~; Sections 2663 and 9773 of Title 10 United States Code, which authorizes the acquisition of land for military purposes; the Act of Congress approved August 28, 1984 (Public Law 98-407), which Act authorizes acquisition of the land, and the Act of Congress approved October 12, 1984 (Public Law 98-473), which Act appropriated funds for such purposes. The public use for which said land is taken is described in Schedule A, which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof. The legal des.cription for the land being taken is described in Schedule A, which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof. The description of the estate taken in the land is described in Schedule A, which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof. Also, the names and addresses of purported owners, additional parties having or claiming an interest in the land are listed in Schedule A and on attached sheets to Schedule A. Finally, the estimated just compensation is set forth in Schedule A or the sheets attached thereto. You are further notified that if you desire to present any objection or defense to the taking of your property, you are required to serve your answer on the plaintiff,s attorney at the address herein designated within twenty (20} days after service of this Notice upon you. Your answer should also be filed with the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida. Your answer shall identify the property in which you claim to have an interest, state the nature and extent of the interest of your claim, and state all your objections and defenses to the taking of your property. A failure to do so shall constitute a consent to the taking and to the authority of the Court to proceed to hear the action and fix the just compensation, and shall constitute a waiver of all defenses and objections not so presented. However, if you have no objection or defense to the taking, you may serve the United States Attorney a Notice of Appearance designating the property in which you claim to be -2- interested. You should also file this Notice of Appearance with the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida. Thereafter you will receive notice of all proceedings affecting the property. At the trial of the issue of just compensation, whether or not you have previously appeared or answered, you may present evidence as to the amount of the compensation to be paid for your property and you may share in the distribution of the award. Re spec~bmitted, Assistant .S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 155 South Miami Aven~e Miami, Florida 3313W_1693 (305} ~ -3- SC'rlEDULE "A" The land which is the subject of this Declaration of Taking aggregates 1.76 acres, more or less, situate and being in St. Lucte County, State of Florida. A description of said land, together with the names of the purported owners thereof and a statement of the sum est/mated to be Just compensation therefor, is set forth on the following pages. TRACT NO. 102 Eastern Test Range Reconfiguratton Acres: 1.00 A tract or parcel of land lying in Section 34, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: For a point of reference commence at the southeast corner of Section 34; thence run West along the South line of said section ~ distance of 1,325.70 feet to a Roint being the Southeast corner of the Southwest ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of said section; Thence North a distance of 2,364.55 feet to a point on the said East ¼ line of said section; Thence West at an angle of 89°58'20" to the left from said East ¼ line ~ distance of 663.01 feet to a point of an orange plastic hub stamped F7-C-1L driven flush with the ground and tacked, said point being the Point of Beginning. From said point of beginning thence run N89°06'26'~, a distance of 208.69 feet to a point of an orange placttc hub stamped F7-C-1M driven flush with the ground and tacked; Thence N01°46'42"E a distance of 208.72 feet to a point of an orange plastic hub stamped FT-C-1N driven flush with the ground and tacked, said point also being the intersect with the South right-of-way line of Canal No. 20; Thence S89°05'50,'E along said south right-of-way line a distance of 206.89 feet to a concrete monument marked R/W L205.2-FCD; Thence S01~16'59"W a distance of 208.64 feet to the point of beginning, containing 1.00 acre, more or less, and designated as Tract 102 of Eastern Test Range Reconftguration. 2 TRACT NO. 102E Eastern Test Range Reconftguration Acres~ 0.76 A tract or parcel of land lying in Section 34, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:. For a point of reference commence at the southeast corner of Section 34, thence run West along the South line of said section a distance of 1,325.70 feet to a point being the Southeast corner of the Southwest ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of said section; Thence North a distance of 2364.55 feet to a point on the said East ¼ line of said section; Thence West at an angle of 89°58'20" to the left from said East ¼ line a distance of 663.01 feet to a point of an orange plastic hub stamped F7-C-1L driven flush with the ground and tacked; Thence N01°16,59,,E a distance of 208.64 feet to a concrete monument marked R/W L205.2-FCD, which on theiSouth right-of-way of Canal No. 20, said monument being the Point of Beginning. From the point of beg~inning run thenceS89°05'50"E along the South right-of-way of said Canal No~. 20 s distance of 620 feet, more or less, to a point on the Western rlght-ofgway of Johnston Road; distanceThenceof 50.0S°utherlYfeet to aal°ngpoint;the Western right-of-way of said Johnston Road a Thence N89°05'50,~ a distance of 620 feet, more or less, to a point on a line which bears S01°16,59,,W from the Point of Beginning; Thence N01°16,59,,E a distance of 50.0 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.76 of an acre, more or less, and designated as Tract 10~E of the Eastern Test Range Reconfigurationo PURPORTED OWNERS LIST Tracts 102 and 102E Dan Biele and Lawrence D. Blele, as Trustees. 2801 East Oakland Park Boulevard Suite 404 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33306 The State of Florida Tallahassee, Florida St. Lucie County Ft. Pierce, Florida Unknown owners, unknown interest holders, persons in possession and other persons not appearing of record whose names and addresses are not known and any and all other persons claiming an interest in said property who are not now known. ESTIMATED JUST COMPENSATION FOR TRACTS 102 and 102E $ 8,200 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 1.76 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN THE COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE, STATE OF FLORIDA, and DAN BIELE AND LAWRENCE D. BIELE, TRUSTEES, et. al., and UNKNOWN OWNERS, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE POSSESSION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF COMES NOW the plaintiff, United States of America, by the undersigned attorney, and states as follows: 1. This is a federal condemnation action in which the United States has filed a Declaration of Taking and has deposited the estimated just compensation into the Registry of the Court, both actions taken pursuant to 40 U.S.C. ~258a, the Declaration of Taking Act. 2. The aggregate acreage of the subject property is approximately 1.76 acres of vacant, unimproved land needed for the establishment of facilities for the use of the Department of the Air Force and for other military uses incident thereto. 3. One of the purposes of the Declaration of Taking Act is to give the United States immediate possession of the property upon the filing of the case. 40 U.S.C. ~258a; United States vs. Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 381 (1943); Catlin vs. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 240-241 (1045); United States vs. Dow, 357 U.S. 17, 23 (1958); BishoD vs. United States, 288 F.2d 525, 527-528 (C.A. 5, 1961); Dade County, Florida vs. United States, 142 F.2d 230, 231 (C.A. 5, 1944); In re United States, 257 F.2d 844, 846 (C.A. 5, 1958), cert. den 358 U.S. 908; and United States vs. 6.74 Acres in Dade Count_~Florida, 148 F.2d 618, 619 (C.A. 5, 1945). As stated by the Supreme Court in the case of United States vs. Miller, ~upra: The purpose of the statute is two-fold. First, to give the Government immediate possession of the property...and secondly, to give the former owner, if his title is clear, immediate cash compensation to the extent of the Government's estimate of the value of the property. When the United States files a Declaration of Taking in a condemnation proceeding, its acquisition of title is immediate and occurs instantly upon the filing of the Declaration of Taking coupled with the deposit of the estimated just compensation. 40 U.S.C. ~258a, plus all cases cited above. This acquisition of title, the deposit, and the transfer of possession, occur as the initial steps in the main proceeding. 4. That the Deputy Assistant Force, (Installation, Environment and Secretary of the Air Safety), James F. Boatright, has found and determined that it is necessary and advantageous to the interest of the plaintiff to acquire such possession. 5. The plaintiff is entitled to possession as a matter of right. -2- WHEREFORE, plaintiff respectfully requests this Court sign and enter an Order of Possession on behalf of the United States. Respec~mitted, STANL~/Y MA~ / Pe~e~o~{e~ /----~ Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 155 South Miami Avenue Miami, Florida 33130-1693 (305) 350-5486 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion for Immediate Possession and Memorandum in Support Thereof was mailed this ~O wA day of May, 1985, to: Dan Biele and Lawrence D. Biele, as Trustees 2801 East Oakland Park Boulevard Suite 404 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33306 Lee Rohe, Assistant General Counsel for the State of Florida Legal Office - Department of Natural Resources Tallahassee, Florida 32303 Tax Collector St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 334 By Attorney -3- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs o 1.76 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN THE COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE, STATE OF FLORIDA, and DAN BIELE AND LAWRENCE D. BIELE, TRUSTEES, et. al., and UNKNOWN OWNERS, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 85-8302-Civ-PAINE. TRACT NOS. 102 & 102E NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE OF CONDEMNATION TO: Tax Collector St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 33450 The enclosed Notice of Condemnation, Complaint in Condemnation and Motion for Immediate Possession and Memorandum in Support Thereof are served pursuant to Rule 7lA(d) and Rule 4(c) (2) (C) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. You must complete the acknowledgment.part of this form and return one copy of the completed form to the sender within 20 days. You must sign and date the acknowledgment. If you are served on behalf of a corporation, unincorporated association (including a partnership), or other entity, you must indicate under your signature your relationship to that entity. If you are served on behalf of another person and you are authorized to receive process, you must indicate under your signature your authority. Complaint in Condemnation and Motion for Immediate Possession and Memorandum in Support Thereof was mailed ~ ~'~ , 1985. If you do not complete and return the form to the sender within 20 days, you (or the party on whose behalf you are being served) may be required to pay any expenses incurred in serving a Notice of Condemnation in any other manner permitted by law. I declare, under penalty .of perjury, that this Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt of Notice of Condemnation, Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 155 South Miami Avenue Miami, Florida 33130-1693 (305) 350-5486 submitted, -2- 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 12h ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ \ m TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL MEMORANDUM To: From: Council Members Staff AGE E)A ITE I 7-G Date: SuOject: September 22, 1986 Council Meeting Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review - Amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Use Element Introduction Pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Council must be provided an opportunity to review and comment on Plan amendments prior to their adoption. St. Lucie County has submitted proposed land use amendments to the State Department of Community Affairs, which in turn is seeking Council,s comments. ~ackground St. Lucie County is considering 20 amendment~s to the Future Land Use Map. Locations of the properties under consideration are shown on the ~ccom- partying map, and the number of acres and proposed changes in land use designations are summarized in the attached list. The County is also considering text amendments that would 1) add language describing P'l~ns for new residential development to bear a portion of educational costs through developer dedications and impact fees, 2) delete the requirement for site development plans with all rezoning petitions, and 3) require a site development or concept plan for proposals to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the Growth Management Policy Plan {i.e., the Comprehensive Plan). Evaluation The proposed amendments to the Land Use Element have accordance, with the requirem been iewed in ~ci)'s review procedures --~nls dE.Chapter 163 rev Florida Statutes, · u,,ow,ng c~nments are offer~daC~ ~°~nc!!~s ~dopted plans and Policies. The - -~ ~ resu~ of that review. The proposed amendments are not in conflic~ or inconsistent with adopted counc~! Plans or Policies. I ~;act~ of agricultural la,,ds to simi Proposals to convert large .... ~ u,s~'ve re-evaluatf-- -: -- : considered ~rior oojectlves for the entire area. u, u, one county,s goals and L Prior to the approval of the land use amendments, the proposed changes should be tested against the St. Lucie County transportation model to assure that the affected roadways can accommodate the mor~ intense land uses. Council supports the efforts of St. 'Lucie County and the School Board of St. Lucie County (see the attached letter) in improving educational opportunities through the use of dedications and impact fees as discussed in the amendment request. The property described by Item 1 _~s close to the sites of the Treasure Coast Square Mall and the proposed Vista Plantation de~elopmen~ in Martin ~ County. The ability of U.S. 1 to accormnodate additional traffic generated by Item 1 must be ensured. Adequate right-of-way should be dedicateo for future expansion of the roadway network prior to the development of this parcel. Considering the proximity of ~to the St. Lucie County Airport, the current land use ~s~gnation of Light Industrial may be more appropriate than the proposed residential land use designation. Considera:ion should be given to plans for future expansion of the airport faci.lities and increased levels of air traff)c, as well as noise and safety issues. The property described by Item 18 contains many acres of wetlands known as .the Northern 'Savannas. Care should be taken to mi~)imize the impacts of a~y ~ development on this environmentally sensitive area. The property described by Item 20 is l ?dian River County ~n ~ . .oc~ted on the border f River Water ManneriSt '~D?~Fi_~he ln~er~ace of the St. Johns c~ ano South Florida Water Manag~ent D~strict. S~nce a development of such size ~n this location may'haye far reaching ~m acts ' · ~_.~land us~ men. dment not be ~J .... Z~ 'L]~. r~cmmended that uuu, cy and Indian Riwr r .... ~.. _~-vv~u.un~l bOth St. Luci ~t .~dverseiy affect ~he~'~Fit~r~ ~ such.an action woul~ grow~ mana-~ ~-~ --~-, ....... Z~ . ,cne~ county to realize ~"~ ~tu ~l~ll[lill ~ ~ vuJuC:lVeS. A primary concern is the relationship of the ro' · , uroan/agricultural bound rv P_~t . w~n the existin- residential _ a . may create compa:ibi ~gr~cultural develonment ,.~__ .~tY problems w~th existing F · r)/uF ~O ' ' . /?d u~e, the C.ounty should plans for this' area .r_vi.',_~"'yJ-),~ c~ns~er its long ran e , p u ~o~) oF lntras:ruc~ure a~)d service~, and the impacts of residential development o~ agricultural activities in ~he area. Additio, ally, a project of the size of :his proposal w~uld be ~ D.R.I. Final consideration of the proposea land usle change should perhaps, wait until a report and reco~,)nend '~ ' issues, at,ohS can be developed that evaluate regional 2 Recommenoation Council should adopt the comme~t'~ outlined above with respect to the Land Use Element and approve their transmittal to the State Department of Community Affairs ~n fulfillment of the requirements of Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. Attachments I I ! September3, 1986 Mr. Peter G. Merritt Regional Planner 620 South Dixie Highway P.O. Drawer 396 Stuart, FL 33495-0396 Dear Mr. Merritt: Subject: Your letter dated 8-26-86--Local Goverrm~nt C~rehensive Plan I' assume the amendmant to the Land Use plan for Saint Luc~ County mentioned in your letter is the School Board ImDact Fee. If this is th case, let me assure you that such a fee is vitally necessary in order -for the School Board to have-the necessary funds to construct new facilities. Currently, the population growth is exceeding the County's ability to provide capital funds. Although the proposed impact fee will not. solve the problem, it will be a great helD. Dr. George R. Hill, Superintendent, and the Board urges you and other agencies to look with favor on the proposed amendment. If this office can ~ any assist= -~ t .... to you, please do not hesitate o contact me at~~_5031' .S° b BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONCRS DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR J. GARY AMENT September 10, 1986 Ms. Marina Pennington Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Resource Management 2571 Executive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, FL 32301 Subject: Proposed Amendments to St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan Dear Ms. Pennington: Per your request enclosed please find copies of the following proposed Amendments to the St. Lucie County Growth Management Rolicy Plan: 3ode Groves, I'nc. H. F. Martek, Or. Bessie W. Minton, et al Strazzulla Brothers If you have any questions on these, please contact Mr. Dennis Murphy of this office. Sincerely, Gary M. Schindler Planning Administrator GMS/DOM/lg cc: County Attorney Petition Files HAVERT L FENN. District No. 1 · E. E. GREEN. District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER. District No. 4 · JIM MINIX. District No. 5 County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Coordinator: Ext. 315 · Building: Ext. 344. · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement. Fyt .'~'7 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION£RS DEVELO:PMCNT COORDINATOR J. GARY AMENT August 29, 1986 Hr. Gerald S. Oames P.O. Drawer 3351 Ft. Pierce, F1 33454 SUBOECT: The Woods of Ft. Pierce Dear Mr. Oames: In regard to your request of August 5, 1986, enclosed please find a copy of the standard request for binding letter determination from the Department of Community Affairs. Before I can officially respond to your request, please complete this form to the best of your ability and return it to my office. . 3GA/DOM/sew Enclosure CC: This is the first project that has come under the guide- lines of Ordinance 86-08,,,.and I feel that we should follow the format of the Department of the Community Affairs as closely as possible. My office will continue to review, your P.U.D. submittal and will return comments on it as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, County Development Coordinator Woods P.U.D. File H.F. Martek P.A. File HAVERT L. FENN, District No. I · E. E. GREEN. Distric£ No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER. District NO. 3 - R_ DALE TREFELNER. District No. 4 · JINI MINIX District No. 5 Count, Administrator - WELDON B LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Coordinator: Ext. 316 · Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317 ,BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION£RS Vla Fede]~al Express August ll, 1986 Mr. games Murley, Director Division of Resource Planning and Management Department of Community Affairs 2571 Executive Center Circle East Tallahassee, FL 32301 Subject: Transmittal of Proposed Amendment to the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan Dear Mr. Murley: Enclosed you will find, for review by the State Land Planning Agency, ten copies of 22 proposed amendments to the St. Lucie County Growth Hanagement Policy Plan. The amendments are being transmitted to you pursuant t~'b the requirements of Chapter 163.~.184 (3) Florida Statute. On Thursday, June 24, 1986, the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on Petitions Number 7, 12, and 17 of the attached agenda. These hearings were held in accordance to statutory requirements in effect prior to July l, 1986. On August 7, 1986, the St. Lucie County 8bard of County Commissioners certified that the Local Planning Agency did in fact hold this hearihg. On Thursday, August 7, 1986, the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing pursuant to Chapter 1~3.3184 (15) Florida Statute, for the purpose of transmitting the balance of the attached agenda to the State Land Planning Agency for review. These amendments are scheduled to be presented to the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency and Board of County Commissioners for final disposition in Oecember of 1~8~. This will complete the second Plan Amendment cycle for 1986, as permitted under Florida Statute and the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners amendment schedules. If, in reviewing this material, you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Gary Schindler, Planning NAVERT L, FENN, District No, I · E. E. GREEN. District No. 2 · ,lACK KRIEGER, Districz No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX. District NO_ 5 County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Ext. 201 & 202 Mr. Murley August 11, 1986 Administrator or Mr. Daniel S. Mc Intyre, County Attorney at 305-466- llO0. I appreciate your Department,s offer of timely consideration of these petitions, as indicated by legal counsel, Rhoda P. Glasco, in her letter of Ouly 24, 1986 to our County Attorney. Any comments that you propose to return should be received by St. Lucia County no later than November 14, 1986, in order to meet the December, 1986 hearing dates. When corresponding with St. Lucie County, I would appreciate it if you'would please copy Mr. Schindler and Mr. Mc Intyre at this same address. Thank you for your time and 'efforts. Sincerely, County Commissioners SM/DSM/lg cc: County Administrator County Attorney Development Coordinator Planning Administrator Ralph Hook Petition Files BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION(ERS DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR J. GARY AMENT 3uly 30, 1986 Nr. Haydon Curtis Dimiter Stoyanoff, Architect 1055 East Ocean Boulevard Stuart, FL 33494 Subject: Ordinance 86-08 Dear Nr. Curtis: As we discussed today, Suly 29, 1986, enclosed please find a recorded copy of Ordinance 86-08, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Nay 6, 1986~ Please pay particular attention to the requirements of Section 1-16-70(B) of this Ordinance. If, after reviewing this material, you have any questions, please let me know. DJN/lg Enclosure cc: H. F. Martek, Or. Martek P.A. File The Woods Site Plan/P.U.D. File D~nnC~s 0erely' Planner HAVERT L, FENN. District No. I · E. E. GREEN. District No.County2 · JACKAdministratorKRIEGER, .DistriCtwELDoNN°' B.3 LEWIs" R. DALE TREFELNER. District No, 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Coordinator: Ext. 316 · Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316· Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement. Fur ORDINANCE NO. ~6-08 AN ORDINANCE AP~NDING CHAPTER 1-16 (PLANNING) OF THg COD~ OP O~IN~Cg~ OF ~T. ~DCIg STATUTES, BY ~DI~ ~TICL~ V. TO ~QUI~ T~T IN CERTAIN INST~CES D~OPE~ S~HIT ~QUESTS FOR BI~ING LETTE~ OF I~E~ATION ~ ~E DEP~~ OF CO. UNITY ~FAI~ ~ AS ~ PR~E~S T~T ~ DETE~INED ~ BE D~LOP~s OF ~GIO~ IHPA~ ~ PROHIBIT ~ FI~ A~ION BY ST. LUCIE COU~ ~TI~ ~ CO~HENSI~ P~~OP~~.~~ME~S' ~ZONI~S, OR THE ISSU~CE OF ~HER ' , NG ~ITH TH~ DEP~~ OF STAT~ EFPE~IVE DATE; ~O~IoN; ~ CO~IFI~TION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Section 380.06 of the Florida Statutes developments' of regional impact. 2. Developments of regional impact through a special permitting procedure requirements of Section 380.06 of the Florida Statutes.. 3. Section 380.06 of the Florida Statutes also incorporates a procedure whereby a determination can be made as to whether or not a project is a development of regional impact. 4. Section 380.06 of the Florida Statutes authorizes local governments to require developers to submit an application for a binding letter of interpretation to the Department of Community Affairs to seek a determination as to whether or not a project is a development of regional impact. 5. This Board desires to implement the provisions of Chapte~ 380 of the Florida Statutes. St~4~k--eh=~Uh- passages added. are deleted; 0~ oo, 500 /HkC~L]~ passages defines are required to' go pursuant to the are NOW, ~EREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PAR~A. ~NDNENTOF C~ER 1-16 (PLANNING]. Chapter 1-16 (Planning) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, is hereby amended by adding Artice V., Sections 1-16-70 - 1-16-73 as follows: n the ~itizens of more than one county. ~a~--~h~e~h- passages are deleted; added. passages are as to whether or not St. Lucie County will require that ali tv will require ~/ommzzsloners, ';- '~ :-- _-. :- i-: : _ : '_ -_.-i .-t' . ' .- _ '--~ ~ ~l --.-] : ~ : [ __ -- : ' i ~ I I [ i ) . --IlI : ] __ bind~n.g l~er of inter · ' i . °" 500 l~OOK added. passages are deleted; ~ passages are /d~ site plan approval le) conditional use approval_ J~) special exceptioI] fied cop~ ~ ~ ' -- ~-"_: ent of regional ' '''' ' a way that ~t pac~, such ~ommitments, limitation ~' ' ' i- ~k--~hrQu.gh_added. passages are deleted; ~ passages are development, shall devel oDment permit ~--{hx~h- passages are deleted; added. 500 ~2774 ~ passages are added. threshhold or twen . ''' ' - - _ raqraph B shall apply, ~_ apply PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida Legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County and adopted prior to January 1, 1969, County ordinances, and Cowry resolutions, or parts thereof, fn conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of th[s ordinate. If this ordinance or any provision thereof sh~l be ~ssages a=e dele[edl ~ ~aSsages a~e held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. FILING WIT~ THE DEPART~NT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Laws, Florida Department of State· the Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of official acknowledgement from the Office of the Secretary of State that this ordinance has been filed in that office. PART F. ADOPTION. After motion and second,-the vote on this ordinance was as follows: PART G. Chairman Havert L. Fenn Vice-Chairman Jim Minix Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner Commissioner E. E. Green Commissioner Jack Krieger Aye aye Aye aye aye The provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word "ordinance- may be changed to "section- "a ' · rt~cle", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through G shall not be.codified. oo 500 c 2776 added. Passages are delet~ed; ~ passages are PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1986. ATTEST: ~k~_. ~ou~_ passages added. are dele ted; passages are STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE The undersigned, Clerk of the Board of County Cc~mlissioners of the County and State aforesaid, does hereby certify that the above and fore- going is a true and correct copy of an Ordinance adopted by the said Board of County Ccumissioners at a meeting held on the 6th day of May, 1986. 1986.WITNESS my hand and the seal of said Board this 19th day of May, Roger Poitras, Clerk of the Board of County Cc~issioners, St. Lucie County, Florida -' ~.:~_ c%- :. ,:'.: ' ~:-....- /- .... '.. .. .__. By: / De~t~ ~: .: i'.:.-'-': Y F '- ?61595 AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THURSDAY AUGUST 7, 1986 5:30 P.M. Petition of H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural, Productive) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) for the following described property: South 1/2 of Sec. T. 4S R 39 E St. Lucle Count , FL.. less canals thereof. ' that- art of the SW 1/4 1 in s°dthweSterly of I95 Right-of-Wa less to SFWMD Sec. 34 T ~ R ._ (Located on North side of Angle Road between 1-95 and Florida Turnpike (North of Canal C-25) Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board of County Commissioners at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /s/ Havert L. Fenn, Chairman TO: FROM: C. A. NO..- INTER-OFFICE ~E:~ORANDU~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Board of County Commissioners Weldon B. Lewis, County Administrator Daniel S. MCIntyre, County Attorney 86-373 DATE: July 29, 1986 SUBJECT: Revisions to Chapter 163.3184, Florida Statutes - Adoption of Comprehensive Plan, or Element or Portion thereof At the recent regular session of the Florida Legislature, Senate Bill 978, which amended several sections of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act_ (.also known as Chapter 163, Florida Statutes) was passed and signed into law. One of the many amendments to this Act dealt with the procedures to be followed for amending a Local Government,s comprehensive Plan. Under the previous statute, the board of County commissioners, only had to certify that the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on the proposed comprehensive plan, element, or portion thereof prior to its transmittal to the State Land Planning Agency for review. Under the new law, the board of county commissioners is required to hold a public hearing on the proposed plan or plan amendment prior to the transmitting of that plan or amendment to the State Land Planning Agency for review. On July 24, 1986, Rhoda pl Glasco, an attorney for the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs opined that the County must follow_ the procedures as amended by Chapter 86-191, Laws of Florida, even tho~ugh all of the petitions were filed before the or regulations must be amended. this matter please let me know. July 1, 1986, effective date. A copy of Ms. Glasco's letter is attached to this memorandum. Apparently, the Department of Community Affairs is taking the position that the date of advertising determines whether the new law applies. In view of Ms. Glasco's July 24, 1986 opinion, I recommend that the Board immediately schedule a transmittal hearing(s) so that the July amendments may be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs as soon as possible. Since the Board had no meeting scheduled for July 29 (Fifth Tuesday), staff, after discussions with the Board Chairman, scheduled the transmittal hearing for Thursday August 7, 1986, at 5:30 p.m. By copy of this memorandum to the County Administrator, I am requesting that he place this item on the August 5, 1986 agenda for "after the fact" permission to advertise. .The Development Coordinator and I will continue to review the amendments to this act and hope to present to you in the near future a summary report on what, if any, present county policies If you have any questions on DSM/sls Copies To: Respe.ctfully submitted, Daniel S. M Int~r~/ County A ttorne~// Development Coordinator Planning Administrator Local Planning Agency Land Use Amendment Petition Files Press/Public STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2571 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 BOB GRAHAM GO~nlor Mr. Daniel McIntyre St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 33482 July 24, 1986 TOM LEWIS, JR. Dear Mr. McIntyre: You requested over the telephone, an opinion as to whether the procedures in section 163.3184 as amended by Chapter 86-191, Laws of Florida, are applicable to your current local comprehensive plan amendments. You stated that your notice for a public hearing by the local planning agency was advertised on July 2, 1986, with hearings scheduled on July 23rd and 24th. It is my opinion that the County must follow the procedures as amended by Chapter 86-191, Laws of Florida, and effective July 1, 1986. Therefore, the local governing body will be required to hold at leas~ two public hearings, the first which must be held at the transmittal stage (See Section 9, Chapter 86-191, Laws of Florida). The second public hearing must be held at the adoption stage. As stated to you, the local planning agency must still hold at least one public hearing with due notice pursuant to s. 163.3174(4)(a), prior to making a recommendation to the governing body. There is no longer the requirement that the local governing body determine that the LPA held a public hearing with due public notice prior to transmittal. ' The Department will make every effort to expedite the review and comment once the amendments are received. Should you have any additional questions or concerns please contact Dana Minerva or me. ' CC: Attorney Margaret-Ray Kemper Dana Minerva Ralph Hook Bob Kessler EMERGENCY '~AG'EMENT · HOUSING AND COM~UNI~ DI!VELO~MENT · REsouRCE P',.~'ING AND MANAGEMENT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION(ERS DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR J. GARY AMENT July 29, 1986 In compliance with the provisions of the Florida Statutes, you are hereby advised that H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural, Productive) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) for the following described property: South 1./.2. of Se_c, 33, T. 34S, R 39.E~ S.t..:..Lu.c.ie..County: ~... less c.a~..al.s ... C20 & C25, lying~ East, .of Fla. ,Turn. pik,e &. W.est of,, .Iy95,,, and, .a,l,,1 easements thereof. To~ether. with that'part o.~.,$he SW .1/4.1y.~ng soutbwes.terly of 195 Right-of~Wa~ l~s.s..to SFWMD, Sec. 34, T 3~I R. ~. , , (Located on North side of Angle Road between 1-95 and Florida Turnpike (North of Canal C-25) A public hearing on the petition will be held at 5:30 P.M. on Thursday, August 7, 1986, in Room 101, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commis- sioners are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board of County Commissioners at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbtim record of the proceedings is made. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. If you have any ques- tions, additional information may be obtained by calling Area Code 305, 466-1100, Extension 359. Very truly yours, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Havert L. Fenn, Chairman 6x- kj HAVERT L FENN District No I · E. E. GREEN, District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER. District No, 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER. District No. ~ · JIM MINIX Distric[ No. 5 County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Coordinator: Ext. 316 · Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext, 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317 k,,..,i'ICE OF CHANGE OF LAND USE The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners proposes to change the useof land within the area shown in the map in this advertisement. A public hearing on the ~roposal will be held on Thursday, August 7, 1986 at 5:30 P.M, at Boom 101, St, Lucia County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE CO. COMP REHENSIVE PLAN F~or~da. A** Petition of June R. Lentz. et al B.- Petition of Hayslio Landscape C.- Peution of lode Groves. inc. D.- Petition of Robert Fender, et al E.* Petition of Wm. E. Caroenter F.- Petition of Laura 8. Flancock G.- Petition of Malcolm Et Sylvia Collins H.- Petition of Chades E~ Jeanette B~ount I.- Petition of K. Terrance Mock J.- Petition of Ft. Pierce 30 West K.- Petition of Rose E. Baumker L.- Petition of Potter/Cleghor~ M.-*Petition of H.F. Martek. Jr., Inc. N,- Petition of Minto~ Sun/Indianoia Groves O.- Petition of Themes Zaydon P-- Petition of Bd. of County Commissioners // ~'~ O.- Petition of John Church R.- Psthion of Bessie Minton. et al " S.- Petition of Dorothy L. Foster T.- Petition of Strazzulia ares. Co. ST. LUCtE Copieslf it becomeSof theneCessary'propose~ amendmentsthese public hearings may be continued from time to time, --.,-- COUNTY to the St. Lucia County Growth Management Policy P.-~n are ava able for publicreView iO the Office of the St Lucie Coun D Please note thai'al proce;dings befo;e the Board of Count~* C~l~lmiss~oners ale I ' ' Building and Zoning Division Room 201 2300 Virgini~ Avenue Ft Pierce Florida during normal business hours . ty evelopment Coordinator- sioners at this meeting will need a record of *~' ....... -~: .... ~. ~ e ectromcally recorded. Any I~e?rson who decides to appeal an action taken · All --~ ~,~==u,,,~ls =.u ~or SUCh purpose may need to ensure that a verbaaum record of the proceedings is Ymade. by the Board of County Comm~s- intereszed persons may appear and will be given an opportunity to be heard regarding the transmittal of these 'P~an Amendments at this time. From RL tRee,entel LOw) to CT (Commemie~ Tourist): located at the Nmlheast comer of Kings Highway and Graham Road. Ft. Pierce 30 West: From SU ISemi-Urban) to RL (Residential Lowl; locsted along the South side of Orange Avenue. approximately ~ mi~e West of Rock Road. From RL (Residential Low) to CG ICommercial Generall; located et the Northeast corner Sout~ U.S. 1 and Lenrmrd Road. B Hayslip Landscape: · From RL IResidential Low) to CG (Commercial GeneraB; located along the North side of Seeger Road~, Approx}mstely 600 ft West of South U.S.I. C. lode Groves. lnc.: From RL (Residential Low) to CG (Commercial General); located at the Northwest corner of South ?-.5th St. and West Midway Rd. D. Robert Fender, et el: From RL (Residential Low) to CG (Commemial Genemlt; located at [he Southwest corner of South 25th St. end West Midwa~ Rd. 1~. Wm. E. Carpenter: ' From RL (Residential Lowl to RM (Residential Medium; located along the East side of Sunrise Blvd., eP~roximately 1600 ft. South of Bell Avenue. Laura B. Hancock: SouthFr°m RM25th(ReeidendalSt. and EdwardsModiumlRoad.t° CG (Commercial Geeerall; located at the Northeast corner of Malcolm ~ $~lvla CollinS: From RM (l:les~dentlal Medium) to CG {Commercial ~eeerall; located along the North side of Ed- ward~ Road, epproximutely 300 ft. East of South 25th St. Chariee ~ deanette Blount: From CG (Cort~er~iaf General to RM lRestdential M~Jium); located at the Northeast comer of South 40th SL and Harvey Avenue. ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD of COUNTY COMMISSION ERS /S/Havert L. Fenn Chairman, K. Rose E. Baumker: From RL IResldential Low} to CG (Coramercisl Generalt: located along the Nor'ih side of Orange Avenue, approximately ~ mile East Of Jenklos Road. L. Potter/Ciaghom: From RL (Resldential LowI to CG ICemmeraial Generall; ~7..ated utthe Northeast comer 0f zger Reed (Ave. EI and North 37th St. ~From AG IAgricultural Productive) to R L (Resldentia LOW); located along the Nor~ side of Angle .oad, between 1-95 and The Florida Turnpike. O · Thomas Zaydon: i ; Prom SU (Semi-Urbanl to IL and St. Lucia Blvd. [Industrial Light]; located at ~ha Northea~ comer af Kblgs HighWay p. Board of County Commissioners: From IL gndusofal Ught) to RM (Residential Modiuml; located along the North akle of St. Lucia Blvd., between Cayuga and Nava|o Avenues. (~ John Church: · From RL (Residential LOwl to RM (Residential Medium); toueted along the West side of Tsmr~nd Drive, approximately 420 ft. South of Ban)on Rosd~ R. Bessie W. Minton, et al: '~ County' ,. ~. .$. I to the Eaat. . · S. Dorothy L. Fo?tar:. ....... ?- .- ~ ! .... ' i · Strazzulia Bro.s, Co. Inc. ~ John 8. Cuh/erhocae, et, al: "- · ' From AG (Agricultural Productrve} to SU {Sera.Urban); located West of the I-~i/Indriu Road in- terchange area. Petitioned property contains ap~roximstely 5650 acres. LOCAL P~ING AG~CY SI'. LUCIE COUNTY, FI~RIDA MINUTES Chairman J. J. Sciturro, Robert Carman, Mabel Fawsett, U. B. Wetherington,J. p. Terpening, Patricia Ferrick and Patricia King Peggy Harris-and William Myers (Both excused absences) County Attorney Daniel McIntyre; Dennis Murphy, Planner; and Karen Jones, Secretary. ~%TEOF~: 7/23/86 (X~fl~D~ 7:00 P.M. ..................... ADJ~/~)~12:05 A,M, PA~ 1 PUBLIC HEARING: #5, Petition of H. F. Martek, Jr., to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural) to RL (Residential, Low) for property located on the north side of Angle Road between 1-95 and the Florida Turnpike (North of Canal C-25). STAFF COMMENTS: The petitioner proposes to develop this site as a 950 unit Retirement Community. The property is presently in a reasonably natural state. It is not used for any agricultural activities. The proposed is below the numerical threshold for Development of Regional Impact. At this time, County Staff is not prepared to offer either a recommendation of approval or denial. We, at this time, defer a formal recommendation until the November hearings on this matter when it is anticipated that the developer will have his application for Planned Unit Development prepared for review. County Staff does not recommend this Agency table this matter. Rather, one of three actions would be appropriate at this time: approval denial forward with no recommendation. ' ' Joe Martek, president of H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. was present along with his architect, engineer, staff attorney, contractor and mother. The proposed project was to construct a 950 unit retirement community. They plan to keep the area as natural as possible with no units facing each other. The property would be designed to offer everything a person would be looking for: security, clubhouse, swimming pools, tennis courts, shuffle board courts, automobile service area. An area for individual gardening plots would be set aside; community store would be owned and operated by the residents; a golf driving range and boat ramp would be available. He felt the project would be a tremendous asset to the Orange Blossom Mall. Mr. Terpening had a question about the project being below the numerical threshold for Development of Regional Impact. Mr. Murphy stated that we would not be required to get a binding letter from DRI. County Attorney McIntyre stated it would be up to the Agency whether or not to get a binding letter. Bill Shanley, one of the owners of Turn of the qentury M6bile Home park came forward and stated he was strongly in favor of this petition. His park was across the street from the proposed project. There was no opposition to this petition. Mr. Sciturro then closed the public portion of the hearing. Mr. Carman st.ated that he did not see where this project, even with 2000 residents, would have any impact on anything that would cause the County to have a regional study, because of the location of the proposed project. Mrs. Fawsett asked Staff if the woodwor ' mobile repair shop., etc. wvu~u~ ue~ a±~q k~ng. shop, metal. .sh°p, auto- Mr. Murphy stated that if the ~^~_~owea ln_a ~esldent~al area. ~v~uu proceeas ~urther after the land use amendment, under PUD, it may be possible to establish community facilities tha~ would allow these services. A motion was made by Mr. Carman to approve the petition. The motion approved,was seconded by Mrs. Fawsett and upon roll call, the motion was unanimously Mr. Sciturro stated that the petition would be sent to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval. Petition MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBOECT: Local Planning Agency Planning Administrator///;~" Ouly 16, 1986 Petition of H.F. Martek, Or., to Amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural) to RL (Residential, Low) LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: EXISTING G.M.P.P. ~PROPOSED G.M.P.P.: PROPOSED USE: PARCEL SIZE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: FIRE PROTECTION: WATER,SEWER SERVICE: North side of Angle Road between 1-95 and the Florida Turnpike (North of Canal C-25) AG (Agriculture) AG (Agriculture) RL (Residen~tial, Low) The Petitioner proposes to construct a 950 unit Retirement Community. 278 acres AG, AR-l, CN, and RMH-5 Properties to the north, west and east are undeyeloped and may be used to intermittent grazing purposes. To the south is the Golden Ponds Mobile Home Park. Airport Fire Station is approximately 5 1/2 miles away. To be provided on site. Memo July 16, 1986 COMMENTS - As indicated above, the petitioner proposes, at this time, to develop this site as a 950 unit Retirement Community. The property' is presently in a reasonably natural state. It is not used fOr any agricultural activities. The proposed is below the numerical threshold, for Development of Regional Impact. At this time, County Staff is not prepared to offer either a recommendation of approval or denial. We, at this time, defer a formal recommendation until the November hearings on this matter when it is anticipated that the developer will have his application for Planned Unit Development prepared for review. County Staff does not recommend this Agency table this matter. Rather, one of three actions would be appropriate at this time; (a.) recommend approval, (b.) recommend denial, (c.) forward with no recommendation. GMS/DJM/lg cc: County Attorney H.. F. Martek Dimiter Stoyanoff AGENDA - LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY WEDNESDAY JULY 23, 1986 7:00 P.M. Petition of H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. to amend the future land use classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural ProducTive) to RL (Low Density Residential Development ) for the following described property: South,. 1,/2, of Sec. ~: T. 34S, ,R 39 E~. St,. Lucie County; FL._ less c,a~, al? , ,C20 & C2.5,. l~ving~ East of Fla. Turnpike &, Wes,t of ,I-9.5, and,, all easements thereof. Together w~h that' Dart of,, the S,W, 1/4 1,yin~ sout, hweste~.ly of I95 Rig.ht-o, fzWay~ 1. e, ss,.to SF, WM, D~ .Sec,., 3'4: T .~, R 39. , .... (Location: North side of Angle Road between 1-95 and Florida (North of Canal C-25.) Turnpike Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Local Planning Agency at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Prfor to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners. Fee: $400 Date= PETITION FOR CHANGE IN FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION Applicant's Name= ApPlicant's Address: i-- - t Jr ne · ~ee Jensen Beach FL .-:-.- - .-~ ~pplicant's Phone Number= I (We) do hereby petition the St. ~ac _Zoni_ng CommisSion a _le County Plann~n · nd the St. LucX g and to change Futur %-- 3 -t-y of following property: - -~au use c~sifXcat~on of ~e Legal Description= (Type or Print only in black ink) ' ' ' ' ~ ' ' ty of Property Tax I.D. ~~. .~ 00-00O0_.. O0o/Q.. .,From:.. MY (Our) reason for making this request I (We) do hereby certify that I (we) own in fee simple ail of the above described property and have legal right to request a change in Future Land Use of said property. I (We). do hereby certify that I (we) own in fee simple that portion of the above described property for which a change in Future Land Use is requested, described as X The remainder of the property described in paragraph requested#l above fOris ownedWhich bychange_ in Future Land Use is ~~% Agent ' ' ~OTICH: IN COMPLIANCE WI*" -- ~. F. Martek, Jr DOPING MAY AND FRF~F~TF~ FOR FI CIE ~U~ ZONING D ' P~B ~ULT ~PROPRIATE D~LI --. IVISION~D~ and that I (we) certify that the above legal description submitted by me (us) represents the property I (we) wish to have reclassified. I (We) unuerstand= - - that I (we) must be Present at the hearing, or will be represented by my (our) agent. Application Application form and information for a specific amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Policy Plan shall be obtained from the County Development Coordinator's Office, Planning Division. The application shall be made on the basis of a Plan Amend- ment Concept. The purpose of the Plan Amendment Concept is to provide an opportunity for a plan to be submitted to the County showing the intent and nature of the proposed amendment with as little expense as possible. The Plan A~endment Concept shall consist of Detailed and Graphic information as set forth in the Plan Amendment concept SUbmission Checklist. After a determina- tion has been made that the application is complete, the required application form and fee will be accepted by the County Develop- ment Coordinator's Office, Building and Zoning Division. The application will be advertised prior to required public hearings before the planning and Zoning Commission and the County Commission. Prior to start of development, submission of detail- ed plans, plats, etc., may be required. A~y detailed submission should be in substantial conformance with the Plan Amendment Concept. All specific amendments and Plan Amendment Concepts approved by the County Commission shall be reviewed by the County Commis- sion at least once every three (3) years. GRAPHIC INFORMTAION 1. Site dimensions Building type and approximate location a. Number of dwelling units if residential b. Floor area if non-residential Building heights in stories Public and private roads, easements, and rights-of-way Accessory structures and special use areas a. Locations b. Use Location and type of all facilities for waste disposal and water supply 7. Conceptual drainage information RESPONSES GRAPHIC INFORMATION 1. Please refer to site plan 4. 5. 6. 7. Please refer to site plan Please refer to site plan Please refer to site plan Please refer to site plan Please refer to site plan Drainage will be designed in accordance with current St. Lucie County and South Florida Water Management District criteria. The project will be elevated to allow for overland sheetflow and absorption with shallow swales draining to a ditch network that will carry the runoff to the lakes shown on the site plan. Positive outfall will be from the lakes to the canals adjacent to the north and south property boundaries. PLAN AMENDMEN~ CONCEPT DETAIL - RESIDENTIAL Provisions of general project information for each phase and for entire project: The Woods of Fort ..~ierce, Inc. 1. Project name e. Villa 2. Type of project 278r 95o Agriculture to P.U.D. a. _A~. tQ Residential. Low b. Density ~. Condominium b. Rental 1. Duplex/Triplex 2. Apartments c. Townhouse d. Mobile Homes 1. Park/Subdivision e. Other - Specify _~9 u~its/.acre 6. 7. i/~87. __ q years c. Exisiting land use Gross Residential Density Development Schedule a. Expected starting date b. Approximate time required for completion Approximate acreage of parcel Project size a. Number of Buildings b. Total number of units Land Use Existing and proposed zoning Growth Management Policy Plan future land use (existing and proposed) On Site On Site bn Site On Site Please note: Public utilities and services or their counterpart: a. Water b. Sewer c. Fire protection d. Surface drainage e. School facilities f. Other - specify This is an adult planned unit development, therefore, school attendance will be unaffected. Since impact fees, etc.., will be required, the school district has been contacted. They will not issue a determination on fees or districts assigned until the week before the fall school term begins. At that time, wewill receive the required information from the school board and forward on to you. N 33/34-34-39 AG GREEN SU ~UE RL ORANGE '..~-, PETITION OF H.. MARTEK, JR., . / TO CHANGE FUTURE L~ND USE CLASSIFICiIION FROM,"AG TO RL 33/34-34-39 'i RMH-5 ORANGE AG GREEN ~. AR-1 BLUE CN PURPLE PETITION OF H.~. MARTEK, JR., If~C. CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FROM AG TO RL '"-4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DI Vt LO PM NT COORDINATOR. J. GARY AMENT June 30, 1986 In compliance with the provisions of Florida Statutes, you are hereby advised that H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. has petitioned the Local Plannin9 Agency to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural Productive) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) for the followin~ described property: . - ~hat- the SW 1/;4 lvin~ so~thwesterl o£ of I95 Right-of Wa~ 1 ....... Y (North of Canal C-25.) between I 95 and Florzda Turnpike A public hearin~ on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M. on Wednesday, July 23, 1986, in Room 101, St. Lucie County Administration Build- ln~, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be ~iven an opportunity to be heard at that time. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Plannin~ Agency are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Local Plannin~ A~ency at this meetin~ will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above described parcel please forward this notice to the new owner. If you have any ques- tions, additional information may be obtained by callin9 Area Code 305, 466-1100, extension 359. Very truly yours, LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ST. LUCIE COUNTy, FLORIDA J- J- Sciturro, Chairman NAVERT L FENN, District No. I · E. E. GREEN, District NO.counS,2 e JACKAdminis~.rarorKRIEGER. District. WELDoNN°' 8.3 LEWIS ® R. D,4LE TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Coordinator. Ext. 398 Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 3t6 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317 '~..~.f~..~/ 7-/~.~ ~f~ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF: ST. LUCIE THE NEW~ .... ~IBUNE Published Seven Doys A Week Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida Before the undersigned authorityK, p ' sonally appeared James J. McMillen or Kathleen L~r~,a/r, says that he/she is Publisher, Publisher's The News Tribune, · SecretaryWh° ob oath PierCeofin St. Lucie ~2od~in?y?effloSrP?dPa?5~tbh?.hedat For°tf copy [ne attached advertisement, being a petition . in the m~+~ -~ . ·........... hearth '~ oL ........ aartek ......... g- .......... was pubhshed ~n smd newspaper in the issues o .................. z/2/s.~ . . . f. ........ Affiant further says tha orr Pierce, in ~;~ ~ ~ t. the said Ne~,o m_.~_ . h i.r_etofg.re been~cg~u~e Co.u.nty, F~.~i~,~Un~et~ a~ n..ewspaper pubHsh~ d y aha has be ...... Y Publ/shed; P erce, in .~ ~n?ered as Second ~,- '~ sm? Mt. Lucie Co,,~'~"~w, spaper has c~ ~/n~ the ~?ZY~ o~., .~.ucie County ~a_.s_,s m~ii matter at th~-' r]~rida, each fu 'th;r sav~'~?~°~cation of t~e' ft~]~a'~ tot a period of ~oYn~u~ o~ce in Fort , ~ ~. ~.~ ne has neighs. ~-:-, ucnea copy of ._ -- year next ti( _ '~.~.'~ ulscount. ~_~ -~-~ ~,um nor nr,,,~;~ advert~seme . _ .pre- th s a,~ ....*~: -, -vua~e, co~:-: ,- .... ao~u any n~^~ ~.nt, and affian S~ ~2~-~']~ ~s.ement for n,~:~[C?'a~mort or re~n~ ~- co aha subscr,O~X~aaon in the saia . -ucu oelore me This 2nd ...... ~' '. ....... day of NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Local Planning Agency for St. Lucie County, Florida, will at 7:00 P.M. on Wednesday, July 23, 1986, in Room 101, St. Lucie County, Florida, hold a public hearing on: Petition of H. F. Martek, Jr., Inc. to amend the future land use classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural Productive) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) for the following described property: South %/2 of Sec. 33~ T..~4S~ .R 39. E~. St.. Lucie, ,Cou~,ty, FL.. less,., ca~. als.,' C20 & C25,. lying East,,of Fla.. ,T..u~n. p.ike .&. West of .I-95, and ,a$,l easements,, thereof. To~ether with t,h,a,t' part .of the SW. 1./4 lying southwesterly of I95 Right.-0f-Way, less tq..SF. WMD~..Se.c... 34, T 34, R ~9... (Location: North side of Angle Road between 1-95 and Florida Turnpike (North of Canal C-25.) If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Local Planning Agency at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Dated this 27th day of June, 1986. PUBLISH: JULY 2, 1986 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /s/ J. j. Sciturro, Chairman :'~ DAN BIELE H. F. Martek, Jr. 3151 S. E. Aster Lane Suite 1303 Stuart, Florida 33497 Dear Mr. Martek: Please be informed that your zoning application for the property under contract that we own, is in complete compliance by Cordia[[y, Dan Biete JUNE 4 1986 I, LILLIAN LUNTTA, DEEDED OWNER OF THE SOUTH 'HALF OF SECTION 33 T 34S, R 39E, ST LUCIE COUNTY FL, DO HERIN AUTHORIZE JOE MARTEK, OR ASSIGNS TO APPLY FOR THE REZONING OF SAID PROPERTY TO A RESIDENTIAL USE. ' 21HE FEB IS THE 86. CONTRACTUAL OWNER UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SALE AGREEMENT DATED WITNESS LILLIAN LUNTTA DEAR LIL, PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN ABOVE AUTHORIZATION. EVEN THOUGH THE COUNTY HAS A COPY OF THE SALES CONTRACT, I GUESS I CANT BLAME THEM FOR WANTING TO BE SURE. ON THE OTHER HAND, IF SOMEONE WAS DEVIOUS ENOUGH TO FORGE A SIGNATURE ON A SALES CONTRACT, WHY WOULD THEY HESITATE TO DO THE SAME ON A LETTER? OH WELL, IM SURE THEY HAVE THEIR PROBLEMS KEEPING EVERYTHING STRAIGHT. JOE SAYS THE DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE RAN IN SEVERAL OTHER S FL PAPERS, AND HE IS SENDING ME A COPY OF THE ONE IN THE LAUD NEWS WHICH HE SAYS IS VERY NICE I WILL SEND YOU A COPY. ' , I WILL KEEP YOU POSTED, NICK Fort Pierce, Florid, ~.~INT .LUCIE COUNTY , FLORIDA, . FEB 2] , 1986 . TEN THOUSAND AND NO/OO- - r ' ' .... Ddlars (~ O. O00.Og ) / ~ H,F..HARTEK .]R~'OR 'ASSIGNS ' - ~ a deposit on ~count of ~h~ purch~e p~c6 o/ the following desc~bed property up~t the term8 an'd conditions ~ stated herein: ' Desc~pt~ of property: THE EAST ~ OF .THE SOUTH ~ OF SEC JJ, T~6S, R39E, .ST LUCIE.CO, FL. A~ APROX t25 ACRES WITI{ A S FOUNDRY OF BEI..CHER CANAL, A~ TOUCHI~ 1-95 AT THE NE CORNER. APROX Purckase pr/ce: $5,6{')0.0O FF~R NE'I' SIIRVEYED ACRE- Dollars ($_700,"000, Terms and ctmdltions of sale: BUYER TO PAY $l 0O, 00g.00 CASI! DOWN AT CLOSING, INCLUDING THE ABOVE DEPOSIT. BAL OF APROX .$600,000.00 TO BE IN FORH OF A PURCHASE HONEY FIRST IqORTGAGE PAYABLE 9Y. INTEREST ONLY ON TIIE NNPAID BALANCE PER Y'EAR, BEGINNING WITH FIRST ANNIVERSARY OF CLOSING, AS A CONTRACTUAL, AND MORTGAGE OBLIGATION: BIIYE]I b'R1ST COI-IPLETE A GOVT.APPROV BRIDGE FROM ANGLE ROAD TO SUBJ PROPERTY AT IIIS OWN L-~XPENSE, lqiTiiiN ONE YEAR FROH CLOSII%~]. ~¢TERHS CONTINI[EO ON REAR."t De/erred payments to bear interest at the rate o/?..9__per cent per annum, payable as follows: Taxes, .insurance, interest, assessments, rents and other expenses or revenue of said prop'erty shall be paid, assumed or pro-rated az follows: PRORATED AS OF CLOSING. · Certified liens if any shall be paid in /ull by the seller, and pending liens if any shall by the purchaser. ' Seller agrees to assume risk of any and ail damage to above described premises prior to of this transaction, ordinary -'~ear a~d tear excepted. Termite Provisions. Seller shall pay all costs of the ti'eatment required to remedy a,y s~ch in. so reported including the cost of repairing or replacing all portions of said impr'ovements '. been damaged structurally, It is understood and agreed that this property is being sold and purchased subfect to t~z restri¢. lions and limitations, of record common to the neighborhood, and subject to any easements /or public utilities, which may be of record,'or may become liens through pending legislation before eonsumma. tion o/contract. . It Ls agreed that tMs transaction shall be closed and the purchaser shall pay the balance of the _DOWNPAYMF. NT and execute 'all papers ?~ecessary to be executed by him /or the completion of his purchase within. C TERHS days /rom delivery or tender to him of an abstract of the said property. The seller is to /urnish an abstract showing his title to be good and marketable and or ,insurable, but irt the event that the title shall not be found good and marketable, the seller agrees to .~se reason- able diligence to make the said title good and marketable, and shall have a reasonable time to do so, and if after reasonable diligence on bls part said title shall ~ot be' made good and marketaao'le within a reasonable time, the seller, shall return the woney this day paid .and all moneys that may have been under this contract, and thereupon he shall be released from all obligations hereu?~der. Or, upon request of the purchaser~ he shall deliver the title in its existing conditio~i. This contract shall be binding upon both parties, the seller and the purchaser, their heir's, execu. tots or assigns, when approved by the owner o/ the property above described.: /oregoingI' or we,instrixment.agree to purchase th~ above descri6ed property' on the_terms and conditions stated in th/ Witness: ' ~~ (S al _ _ (Seal) [, or we, agree to sell the above mentioned property to the above named purchaser on ,the term~ and conditions ~tated in the above instrument. Witness: I, or we, agree to pay the above signed broker, as eommisslon /or /lading a purchaser /or the. above property, the sum od OY, OF 'ALL PRIN & INT AS RECIEVED (CONT & OPTION) Dollars ($. I O~ ) or on,.half of the deposit, in ease same i~ forfeited by pu'rchaze~ provid'ed same shall not ezceed the full amount of the commission. ' W imess : . - , - - -.,; cseal) · (Seal) SAID BRIDGE biJST HAVE-~PACITY TO SERVICE 'ALL PROP6SED UNITS FOR TI-iE E OF SEC 33-. ACCESS IS¢;UARANTEED'TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS oF ~E S ~ OF SEC 33 EXCEPTING POSSIBLY THAT PART W OF TI~E 'RIRNPIKE,. ' SELLER GIVES BUYER. roLL ACCESS. TO PROPERTY. AT HIS OWN RISK D.URIr~ ~N CaSE OF DEFAULT By BUYER, SELLER a MORTOaGE.HOLDER HAY LOOK DEPOSITS, SECURED LAND, AND TI-IR BRI~E VA:LUE.FOR. DAHAGES. TttI S CONTRACT I S CONTI~ ENT- ON APPROVAL, FOR:~UTIL1.TIES HOOK UP, .D~ZLOPER FINANCIRU, R~ONI~,. AND APPROVAE. FRO}~ AEI>, 60~T' A'GENCIES THAT b~IST: APPROVE SUC]I A D~ELOPMENT, BIIYER ]lAS '6 MONTiIS FROM: DATE~OF THIS CONTRACT TO OBTAIN UTILITY & FINANCING CO~[bIIT[.iENTS, OR 'CONTI~JE WITHOUT THEM. BUYER tlAS l 2 blONTHS FRObl DATE' OF CONTRACT TO OBTAIN R~ONI~ .TO RESIDENTIAL WITlt. A '[IINIMUbl OF 5 UNITS PER 'ACRE, 'AND CLOSE UNDER THIS CONTRACT. liE blAY CLOSE WITH OR WITI[OUT TIlE REZONI~, BUT lie NIIST CLOSE WITHIN 12 blONTHS, OR TIIIS CONTRACT IS VOIDED. - :~ IF AT ANY TIME THE REZONI~ REQUEST IS DENIED IN S~C ~ , -'- .. . , . . , THE SE~LER DEMAND AN ADDITI · -. FR "* ....... ' ONAL NON RE~JRNABLE. OPTION I, EE OF $5,000.00 PER MONTH' ,' Ob, rl~} ,UYER TO AVOID LOSS.OF,ALk RIGHTS U~ER.THIS CONTRACT. BUYER MA EXTEND CLOSING 'DATE TO WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF~CONT DATE, AT PMT RATE OF$500~, -~ ~aA5 CON~-RACT. SELLER AGREES TO .lOIN IN ALL APPLICATIONS AT ~O OR LIABILITY TO HER. UPON DEFAIILT BY BUYER, SELLER MAY CONTt~E ANY PERMITTI~ AND REZONI~ AT HER OWN ~PENSE. INITIAL REZONING WILL BE FOR TIlE EAST 1 25 ACRES. · TIME. IS OF TItE ESSENCE R~ARDING ALL ASPECTS 01; Ti liS CONTRACT. . RELSASES- ALL R/W'S GIVEN WITtt RELEASES WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE NET aCREAGE TO BE 20 ACRES ABUTTI~ AND FILLING THE SE' CORNER TO BE RELEAS~ AT CLOSING. l 0 ACRES ABU~I~ AND FILLING THE NE CORNER TO BE RELEASED UPON C PLETION OF THE BRI~E.i RELEASES WILL HAVE R/W~O~T~{ &ND EAST BOUN RIMS. ~a ~rm ~Ouau~I~ SCHE~JLE~ ALL R~EASES WILL B~IN AT THE SE CORNER GROW CONTIGUOUSLY NORTH ALO~ E BOUNDRY, THEN ~TEND WEST ALO~ NORTH BOUNDRY, TItEN CONTIGUOUSLY SOUTH TO B~JNDRY, AND NORTH AGAIN, SO AS TO DIVIDE T]~ PROPER~ INTO AN EAST AND WEST PARTS, WIT}{ NO UNR~SONABLY LO~ "L' SHAPES, OUT PARCELS OR INACCESSABLE PARCELS. ~;~/~': PAYMENT REQUIRED ~R RELEASES WILL BE COMPUTED BY DIVIDIN~ ALL THE UNR~SED ACREAGE INTO TIlE PR~A.L BALANCE DUE, FOR A aTE Or ~0~r OPTION- FOR CONSIDERATION THAT I~'PA~OF TIII$ CONTRACT, S LERO GIVES BUYER A 2 YEAR OPTION ~0 PURCt.mSE TIIE N ~ OF THE S N OF 33 LYING OF THE ~NPIKE, WITH ALL TERMS IDENTICAL TO TliE P~IRCImSE PART OF THIS CONTRACT. THIS OPTION WILL BE VOID UPON DEFAULT BY BUYER ON ANY PART OF ~.'=.~(~. '. ' THI S CONTRACT. YEAR,.BUYER AS~USTA PARTIIAVE OFR~SEDMTG, A MINI~IIM OF 20 ACRES PER YEAR, AFTER TItE' FIRST ~UYER TO-PAY ALL NORMAL CLOSI~ COSTS FO " EXCEPTING TITLE ~a~,~,~ .......... ~ ...... R BUYER & S~LER, SPECIFI~LLY ~~~, OR ANY ABNORMAL COSTS. , ~LERS A TTY FEES I~ ~ BIj YERS WITNESS ' -~l~ ~:. ~ ~./ / ~ SELLERS WITNESS .. - ' ~ELLE~& ~GNA~RE DATE MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Zoning Administrator Planning Administrator ! Authorization for scheduling for Please schedule the attached Petition for review by the appropiate Board: [] County Commission - Plannin§ and Zoning Commission [] Board Of Adjustment ~ [] This petition has been determined to be complete by the Planning Division. GMS/djm MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Zoning Administrator Planning Administrator Completeness Review of the Attached Petition FOr The attached petition has been submitted to my office for review. Per your request, I am forwarding it to you for your review and comment. If you have any comments, please indicate them below and ret'urn this form to me. Thank you. ~MS/sew FILE COPY St. Lucie County BUIL.blNG DEPARTMENT City of Ft. Pierce City of Port St. Lucie RECEIPT N° 2 5 4 NO, St. Lucie Village RECEIVED OF __ FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA _~_~ !,~'~ EXPLANATION ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT TOTAL AMT. REC'D $. ~-~' White Customer Canary Finance Pink File Copy