The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHuizenga, WayneBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION£RS JanUary 25, 1988 D6V LOPM6NT DIR6CTOR J. GARY AMENT Mr.. Jack Carmody Agent for H. Wayne Huizenga Gunster, Yoakley, Criser & Stewart, P.A. 10 Central Parkway, Suite 400 Stuart, FL 33497 Dear Mr. Carmody: This letter is to confirm that on December 1, 1987, the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County, Florida, granted the petition of H. Wayne Huizenga for a change in land use from SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) for property located at the southeastern corner of St. Lucie County on the St. Lucie River, east of the end of Becker Road and south of Perimeter Road. A copy of recorded Ordinance No. 87-95 is enclosed for your information. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Jack Krieger, Chairman dcm HAVERT L. FENN, District No. I m JUDY CULPEPPER. District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 e R. DALE TREFELNER District NO. 4 ® JIM MINIX. District No. 5 Counr~, Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue e Fon' Pierce, FL 33482-5652 e Phone (305) 466-1100 Director: Ext_ 398 e Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317 ORDINANCE NO. 87-95 FILE NO. PA-87-14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY 'GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 86-01 BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY ON THE ST. LUCIE RIVER, EAST OF THE BECKER ROAD AND SOUTH OF PERIMETER ROAD (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN) FROM SU (SEMI-URBAN) TO RL (RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY DEVELOPMENT) MAKING FINDINGS; PROVIDING FOR MAKING THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND ADOPTION. WHEREAS, the Board of Coun%y Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. H. Wayne Huizenga, by Agent: Jack Carmody presented a petition to amend the future land use classification set forth in the-St. Lucie Cou~nt~IGrowthM~nagem~nt Policy Plan from ~J (Semi- Urban) to RL (Residential Low property described below. 2. The St. Lucie County Densit~ Development) for the Local PlaP~ing Agency, after holding a public hearing on November 10, 19'87 of wP~ch due notice was published at least seven (7) days prior to said hearing and all owners of prope~ within five hundred feet (500') were not~if~ied kn/mai! of said 'hear£ng~ ha-s recommended that-~che B-oa£d am.~nd the futu~re land use classification set forth in tlne St. Lucre Count~7 Growth Management Plan from SU (Se~-Urban) to RL (Residential Low Densit~ Development) for the propem-t~- described below. ]Book 1~$.- Page ~/-7. PubLic ~.eccrds of £~. %ucie County 1/& lyin~ ~= Gl!son Road. of ~n~ainin9 177.42 acres ~re or less'~ ~ ~D ALSO LESS ~D ~XCEPTIN~ THEREFROM: PARCEL !: Be£ng a parcel of land lying in Government Lot m, Section 36. Township 37 South. Range &0 East. ~t. Lucie County' FloriDa and beinq more particularly Oescribed as follows: ~ommence at the Southeast corner ~f said Section 36: thence )~ 00~&~'16'' £, a!on= the East line of said Secton 36. a distance of 22aS.B& feet ~o the POINT OF BE'~INNING of the follo~in~ described parcel: Thence-N 69^31'36" U a distance of 6&6.73 feet;- ~hence N 29'&~='35'' .~ a distance of aSi.50 fee%: =hence N $~c=ion 36. To-~.ip M7 ~=%:r.h. Rathe L0 =_a_~=. Sr._ Lu¢ie County. Florida lyi~ --f-' ...... - ............. -~.~ ~ T'- v -.~ . ~e-' s~theas~ern'-corner of St_ Lucie - '- ....... S~_ ~e 9~. e8s~ o~ the em8 o~ ~ecAe= Ao~ a~d sou~ om ~e~lmete~ Road. ) F. APPLICABILITY OF 0RDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable as stated in Paragraph A. G. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and hereby is directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. FILING WITH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. The County Attorney shall send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Department of Community Affairs, The Rhyne Building, 2740 Centerview Drive, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399. I. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of official acknowledgment from the Office of Secretary of State that this ordinance has been filed in that office. J- ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Jack Krieger Vice-Chairman Havert L. Fenn Commiossioner R. Dale Trefelner Commissioner Jim Minix Commissioner Judy Culpepper Aye Aye Aye Aye BOARD OF COUNTY COHHISSIONERS ST. LUCIE C,OUNTY~, FLORIDA SPECIAL MEETING Date: December 1, 1987 Tape: #1 - #3 convened: 7:00 p.m. adjourned: 10:35 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman Jack Krieger, Vice-Chairman Havert L. Fenn, 3im Minix, Sudy Culpepper, R. Dale Trefelner Others Present: Daniel Mclntyre, County Attorney; Terry Hess, Planning Administrator; Dennis Murphy, County Planner; Walter Smith, Deputy Sheriff; Oane C. Marsh, Deputy Clerk 13. Petition of H. ~ Huizenga~ to amend the Future Land Use Maps ~-~tl~'-L~-Jc-~e County Grow~hFLManagemen--~--P~licy-pl-~'fr-~ S__~-----(Se-~i-Urban~ t° RL (Low Den~~e'Side~tial-Developmen---~ ~a~d ~ (Commercial General)-- - Reference is made to memorandum from Planning addressed to the Board, dated November 24, 1987, captioned subject. Administrator, on the above John T. Carmody appeared before the Board on behalf of the petitioner to request approval of this petition. Mr. Carmody also advised that petitioner would like to wi~~-tbe-~aque~st~d changes for._C~o~Eu~e~.~&~a.l.~Laod Use The Board was also advised by staff (A-aC(-the proposed marzna in this project would not require a commercial zoning, because it is not for a commercial project; and also it must comply with the Fire Department Code Requirements and with the protective requirements of Aquatic Preserve, and would be only for the use of the residents who live in this developed area. It was moved by Com. Culpepper, seconded by Com. Minix, to adopt Ordinance No. 87-95, an ordinance amending the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, Ordinance No. 86-01 by changing the land use 'designation of the property located at the Southeastern corner of St. Lucie County on the St. Lucie River, east of the Becket Road and'South of Perimeter Road (more particularly described herein) from' SU (Semi-Urban) (Residential Low Density Developmen<t~~G (commercial general) AR-t RS-4 PUD GU RED~ BROWN BLUE GREEN ~ AR-1 TO RL AR-1 TO CG 4( PETITION OF H. WAYNE HUIZENGA BY AGENT: JACK C^RMODY TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FROM SU TO RL AND ~1) TN fir OSC SU CL RL ORANGE BLUE GREEN BROWN ~ SU TO RL SU TO CG PETITION OF H, WAYNE HUIZENGA BY AGENT: JACK CARMODY TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FROM SU TO RL AND SU TO CG ME MO RANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: County Administrator County Commission Planning Administrator November 30, 1987 December 1, 1987, County Commission Review of Growth Management Policy Plan Land Use/Rezoning Amendments As the Board is aware, on Tuesday, December 1, 1987, you are sCheduled to review a series of Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Rezoning Amendments as a part or,the December 1987 review cycle. Under separate cover, you were transmitted copies of the staff reports on these petitions. Attached, you will find a copy of the agenda for this meeting. Since the preparation of these reports/agenda, two items have emerged that staff would like to bring to this Board's attention. First, on the attached agenda, reference is made to a petition on behalf of Ft. Pierce Investors Ltd., for a change in land use and zoning. Please note that at the petitioners request, this pro3ect has been withdrawn from consideration. This request for withdrawal ~ was presented at the November 10, 1987, Local Planning Agency/Planning and Zoning Commission review meeting. Due to the fact that we had already set up advertising for this petition, it was necessary to include this item on the agenda for this meeting. Please note, since this item was withdrawn at the LPA/P&Z meeting and no action was taken on it, this Board should simply acknowledge its withdrawal for the record. Secondly, in regard to petition number I-K, both this office and after further review by the County Attorney we would at this time offer an amended recommendation for this Board's consideration. As you will recall, from reading our comments of November 24, 1987, the petitioner is offering to withdraw from consideration those parts of this petition that would add a commercial land use designation to portions of this property. The petitioner did request, following discussions with staff, that the property along the St. Lucie River originally planned for a commercial designation, be included in the requested amendment from SU to RL. From a strict land planning point of view, staff has no ob3ection to this requested change. November 30, 1987 Page 2 Subject: Plan Amen~nent Review - Agenda The proposed inclusion of this property as residential would be a lower intensity use than the commercial and generally consistent with previous Board actions in regard to this type request. However, upon further reflection we feel that there may be some question in regard to the consistency with this action. Both the County Attorney and I would be more comfortable, from a challenge perspective, if the properties requested for commercial use were simply dropped and left in their present land use state, and that no action be taken to amend them to something else, unless the appropriate procedures were followed. Staff has reviewed this issue with the petitioner's representative and determined that such an action would not have any adverse effect upon the proposed development plans for this pro3ect. If you have any questions on these two items, staff can provide additional elaboration at the public hearings. If you have any other questions, please let me know. DJM/mg PLANi(Bi4) cc: County Attorney Commission Secretary PA & RZ Petition Files COMMISSION REVIEW: DECEMBER 1, 1987 AGENDA ITEM: 1 - K FILE NO.: PA-87-O14 ORDINANCE NO.: #8?-95 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: County Administrator County Commission Planning Administrator November 24, 1987 Petition of H. Wayne Huizenga, to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi-Urban) to RL (Low _Density Residential Development) and CG (Commercial General). On Tuesday, December 1, 1987, you will be asked to review a petition on behalf of H. Wayne Huizenga, for a change in Land Use from SU to RL and CG for property located along the the North Fork of the St. Lucie River, in extreme southern St. Lucie County. The petitioners propose to develop this property for residential use. On Tuesday, November 10, 1987, this petition was presented to the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency for review and recommendation. At that hearing the petitioners representatives requested that, in light of recent changes in the basic development plan for this project, they would like to withdraw the requested changes for Commercial Land Use. Referencing the property description map included in this package, this request would effect those cross hatched parcels designated with the letter "A". The petitioner has further requested, that the parcel of land along the St. Lucie River, originally to be considered for a commercial designation, be included within the area for consideration as Low Density Residential. The property at the intersection of Becker and Gilson Roads, would retain its present SU Land Use designation. November 24, 1987 Page 2 Petition: Huizenga, W. File No.: PA-8?-014 County staff has no objection to the proposed deletions. The requested change for the property along the St. Lucie River from CG to RL is consistent with this Boards policy of permitting a lateral, or downward, movement in Land Use/Zoning designations during the public hearing process. Staff discussions with the petitioners representatives indicate that there may ultimately be a request for some type of commercial use at the intersection of Gilson and Becket Roads. However, given the emerging character of this area, and the proximity of sensitive environmental lands adjacent to this property, this site offers itself as a prime candidate for application of the County's new Planned Non-Residential Development District, instead of a standard commercial zoning application. Noting the petitioners requested amendments, the Local Planning Agency, by unanimous vote, agreed to forward a recommendation of approval to the attached Draft Ordinance #8?- 95. Please note that this Ordinance, as being presented to this Board, HAS NOT been modified to reflect the recent requests of the petitioner. Any approval action by this Board in regard to Draft Ordinance #87-95, must also include direction to amend the legal descriptions contained therein, in accordance with the petitioners proposals, if so desired. In addition to the Draft Ordinance #87-95, please find attached copies of our original staff report to the Local Planning Agency on this petition, as well as the minutes of that meeting. As required, this petition was reviewed by the Department of Community Affairs and other interested Parties. Comments were received from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC), Department of Natural Resources (DNR), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), and Martin County Board of County Commissioners. For the most part, these agencies expressed concern about the sensitive wetland environments in this area and recommended that all design activities on this site include best management practices in protecting the functions of these areas. Furthermore, all development activities along the shoreline of the St. Lucie River Aquatic Preserve must be in accordance with the approved management plan for this estuary. Staff has provided the petitioners representatives with copies of this information and will be working closely with them through the development processes. November 24, 1987 Page 3 Petition: Huizenga, W. File No.: PA-87-014 Additional comments from the Regional Planning Council address concerns expressed~ by both St. Lucie and Martin County officials in regard to the impacts of any development on this site on facilities within Martin County. The developers representatives have been advised from the earliest contacts with my office, about the need for careful coordination of this development plan with both Local Governments, as well as the City of Port St. Lucie. Staff recommends approval of Draft Ordinance #8?-95, amended by the petitioner, as If you have any questions on this matter, please let us know. D~ elo~ment Director Terry~L. Hess Planning and Zoning Director Daniel S. McInty~e County Attorney// DJM/d3m HUIZE3(B.DEC) cc: County Attorney John T. Carmody Commission Secretary Press/Public ..... TUESDAY ~GENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER ±, 1987 7:00 P.M. Petition of H. Wayne Huizenga, by Agent: Jack Carmody, to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) and CG (General Commercial Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: At the southeastern corner of St. Lucie County on the St. Lucie River, east of the end of Becker Road and south of Perimeter Road.) Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners November 9, 1987. Legal notice was published in the News Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on November 24, 1987. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /s/ Jim Minix, Chairman FILE NO. PA-87-014 Agenaa Item: File Number: (~ 13 PA-87-014 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Local Planning Agency Planning Administrator November 2, 1987 Petition o~ H. Wayne Huizenga to Amend the Future Land Use Maps Of theSt. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi-Urban) to RL (Low Density Residential) and CG (General Commercial Development) LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: EXISTING G.N.P.P.: PROPOSED G.MoPoP.: PROPOSED USE: PARCEL SIZE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: East side of Gilson Road at its intersection with Becket RoaD. Property lies along the west shoreline of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River. AR-1 (Agricultural Residential - 1 du/ac) SU (Semi-Urban) CG (General Commercial Development) To develop a P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) consisting of commercial and residential Oevelopment. 182 ac. County: PUD and AR-1 Port St. Lucle: GU and RS-a To the north of this site is ~ne existing s'ubOivision of WiOe Waters, to the Northwest is the Harbour Rioge P.U.D., properties to the west and sOuth are generally vacant and undeveloped at November 2, 1987 Page 2 FIRE/EMS: ~ATER & SEWER: this time. South of Canal C-23 ( Martin County) are existing single family development areas. Station #10 (Dalton Circle) approximately 10 miles away. is See Comments- STANDARDS FOR REVIE#: In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the Growth Management Policy Plan, the Local Planning Agency shall consiOe~ and make the following Oeterminations: Whether the proposed amendment is consistent all elements of the St. Lucie Growth Nanagement Policy Plan The proposed amendment-is consistent with the Residential Development policies of the St. Lucid County Growth Management Policy Plan. In aOOition this area is presently inOicateo as Low Density ResiOential under the Port St. Lucid Comprehensive Plan. Specific policies in support of this petition include #2, #24, ~25 and #26. #netne= and the extent to .nicn the proposed amendment is consistent .ltn existing and proposed land uses In this area; The proposed change in land use will permit the development of a mixed residential project at a maximum density of 5 ou/ac. The petition includes the designation of two small commercial areas that coulo Oe oevelope.o to serve the needs of the resiOents, Doth existing and future, in this portion of the County· November 2, 1987 Page 3 Whether there nave been changed conditions that require an amendment; This unincorporated area of St. Lucie County is in a transition stage of development from vacant to low lntensity~ nigh income residential communities. The areas of adjacent Port St. Lucle are platted, but in 11tnt of significant environmental, wetland~ concerns these areas may nave to be redesigned. Uses wltnln Hartln County are Slmilar to the unincorporated areas of St. Lucle County. 4. Wnel let and the extent to which the proposed a Iment -ould result in demands on public faci , and -nether or the extent to ,nicn the prop9sed amendment would exceed the capacity of .. such.public facilities, includino but not limite t~ansportation facilities, sewage facilities, wate.]~ supply, parks, d~ainage, schools and eme~¢ency medical facilities; The proposed change in land use will in itsel? nave~no ±m act u on the ' . ~ P public ?acillt¥ n ~n tn' ~ .... eeos z_ zs~rea, nt the time or submission o? a speci?ic development plan, complete addressing o? all transportation, water/wastewate= and drainage neeasi will be addressed. Wnet~eri and the extent to which the proposed ~men~ent would result in s~gnzficant adverse zmpac'ts on the natural environment; See Comments Whether and the extent to which the proposeo amendment would ~esult in an oraerly and logical devel~,pment pattern, specifically identifying any negative effects on such pattern; Tne p~oposeo amendment logiciel Oevelopment ReSidential densities those .of Port St. Lucle represents a reasonable and pattern for this area. wOuld be consistent, with and Nartin County. November 2, 1987 Page 4 COMMENTS The petitioner is proposing to develop this property as a mixed use resident~lal/commerc£al development. The master development plan for tnls site lncludes a small commercial area at the intersection of Gllson and Backer Roads along wltn a commercial area around an existing cove on the Nortn Fork of the St. Lucia River. The petitioner is proposing to preserve two extensive wetlano systems on site as well as creatlng new wetland areas to be used as a part of the storm water management system. Under the aeveloper's proposed land use classification, the maximum number of units that this site will accommodate is 885. The actual number is expected to be less. Although tnis project is not a clear Development of Regional Impact, staff would at this time advise the developers that because of tnis project's unique location, bOth Martin County and the City of Port St. Lucia will be consulted in the eevelopment review process about the impacts of this project in those jurisdictions. Agency comment nas been received from the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRRC), Flolrida Oepartment of Natural Resources (DNR), and tne South Florioa Water Management District (SFWMD). Both DCA aris TCRRC are in concurrence with our recommendation tnat born Martin County and the City of Port St. Lucia be consulted in reviewing the eevelolpment impacts of tnis project, when finally submitted. Staff nas been in contact witn the appropriate officials of both communities in assessing this situation and further contacts wili be made as warrantee. Staff is keenly aware of the limiting factors on proviaing services in this area aha will ensure tnat all proper mitigative steps are aooressea. Both the the SFWMD and DNR nave commented on the possible environmental impac~ts of this oeveiopment. The petitioner nas been aoviseO through ail staff contac-ts, that prior to the issuance of any Oevelopment approvaIs, ail outstanding questions with regard to impacts upon the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Aquatic Preserve and ali internai wetland areas must be aooresseo to the satisfaction of the appropriate permitting eno reguIatory agencies. November 2, 1987 Page 5 As inoicateo on tne attacneo maps, a small pocket appears to nave been OreogeO at some time in the past for the use as a marina. Examination of aerial photography of this slte inoicates the existence of finger piers in tnls area. It will be the responsibility of the petitioner/Oeveloper to Oemonstrate that this area is fully ano lawfully autnorizeO to be a marina facility prior the final authorization of any marine relateo Oevelopment aotivit~ies. Attacneo you w~ill fino a copy of Draft OrOinance #8?-95, granting approval o this petition. Citing the above Stanoaros ano Comments, st recommenos tnat this Agency forwaro a recommenoation of to the Boaro of County Commissioners for this petition. OSN/OS/mg Attachment HUIZE2(B.DEC) cc: County Attorney 3onn T. Carmoay Rress/Pu~llc TUESDAY AGENDA - LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY NOVEMBER 10, 1987 7:00 P.M. Petition of H. Wayne Huizenga, by Agent: Jack Carmody, to amend the FuTure Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Low Density Resi- dential Development) and CG (General Commercial Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: At the southeastern corner of St. Lucie County on the St. Road.)Lucie River, east of the end of Becker Road and south of Perimeter Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of'the proceedings, and that, for such pur- pose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings is made, Which record includes the testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be ~worn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners October 20, 1987. Legal notice was pub- lished in the News Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on October 21, 1987. FILE NO. PA-87-014 · p~o~ uosx~D ~o X, ~°-~q~Iz ~PI~ ~ 08 ~q: ~o uo~ . u~q: ss~] "ePlJoI~ ~llunoD a~n~ *~S '~30~ a~ue8 'qlnos ZC d~q~u~o.I' 'DNINNI93~! &O .%NI04 ~ o~ '~I ~o emom '3e~] ZO'O0~[ jo m~u~2sTp e 'aUTT 3se~ pies Bu°I~ ~ .00.69o00 S aaumq3 ~9£ uoI3~aS ~o auli 2se2 pTes~oje ~tt3 · o aJom a~aa~ 099 ~o aoue~s~p e ,? ~oq ~uamu~aAO0 to ouii q~oN aq~ §UOlU 3 .90,~0o6g M souaql ~ lo3 ~uamuJaAo0 ples ~o xauaoa 2somqlaoN oql o3 .6~,~o00 N ~Dnaq~ ~9£ uoI~DaS p~es to ~ 1o~ ~uamu~Ao0 ~o aui[ ls~M o~ ~asj 99'0Z[1 to ~us~sTp ~ M ,,gZ,gTo6~ S ~uaql 'O · NINNIO3ff MO :smOllOJ se paq!aosap tllelnOIl~ed aaom ~uiaq ~epiaoi~ ,X~unoD sion~ '~S '~se3 0P agueM 'qlnoS Z£ dIqsuao& '9£ uoI~aS ~ ~o~ auamu~a.oD uI ~u!~ puli to lauded e gu~ag 'ssaI ao aaom s,~,e IZ'0~ guluIeluoa £ pus ~ 'I Sq~JHVd 'ssa[ ao a~om sa~ae OL'L ~uIu!eluoD 'joaaaql 2aaj 00'019 qlnos *ql SSMq *PI~°I~ '£1unoD *I~nq '~S au K~A-Jo-3q~Ia peoM uOSITD Jo 2saA pus !epiaold 'flunoD *T~nq '~S jo :[ qMDHVH · ss~[ ao aaom saa~V I~'g ~uIule~uoo 'ePIaoIM 'K3unoD alan? '3S to spaomaM =IIqnd '0g~ ~ed '£9~ Moo~ 'a'O ul papaooa~ pus p,leooio~ spzo~ ~Ilqnd 'i~ a~.~ '~I ~oo~ paa~ uI paqij~sap ~aa,a~ jo q$loN 8uilI ep]aolM '~luno0 si*n? 'IS 'seem 0~ ,§ue~ 'qlno$ ~£ dlqstm°& '9£ uoIloaS '~ ~o~ luamuJa^oo ~o 3Jed leq3 IIe gutaH 'ss*I Jo ~Jom s,a~e g'0I SuIuIeluoD '9NINNIOM~ MO &NIOff aq~ ol ssaI lo aao~ Saaj lg9 Jo a~ue~slp e ,u!I uoi~,~S ples Suoie 'M .91,6Po00 S a~uaq~ !9[ uoIl~aS to anli ~seM pies sql q~Im uoI~asaalut aq~ o~ ssa[ mo aaom ~aaj gg9 to aoue~sip eauI! Ja~ea q~IH uea~ Iean~eu aq~ gUOle sql ol ssaI ~o aaom ~aa~ ~6~ to auu~lsIp e 3 ,,gg,CloZ9 N a~uaq~ ~3aaj ,,g£~[9o6~ N a=uaql ilaaj [£'9~9 7o aouelslp e g .9f,I£o69 N aauaq£ :Ia*aed paqlaosap ~utmOTIOJ aq~ to DNINNIOM~ MO £NIOd sql ol leal ~8'8~[ ~o a~uelsTp e '9£'uoil~aS pies ~o audi 1sea sql ~uole '3 .91,69o00 N aauaq~ f9[ uoI~aS pies jo aauao~ ~seaq~noS sql ~e a~uammoO :smoIIOJ se paqIa~sap XI~[nDi~]~d a~om ~uIaq pus eplaoiM ~f3unoD aT,hq ':S '3sam 0~ agu~M 'qlnos ZC dIqsu~oj, '9[ uoI~aS '9 1o7 ~uamuaa^oo ui ~u[&[ PUS1 ]o l~D~d u ~uIoH Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence S 88°35'3(}'' W along t]]~ South line of said Section 36, a distance of 1763.46 feet to the ~OINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described ceuterllne; thence N 17°30'20'' W a distance of 890.24 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Westerly, hav;ing a radius o · ?°35'57"' thenc : _ . f 1000.00 feet and a centre "~".t"., e. Nor_~h. er/.y along the arc of said .curve .... 1 angle of 254.85 feet to the intersection with the Wear line of said Government of a e1 Lot 3. Also less that right-of-way for Becker Road as recorded in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of st Lucie County, Florida described as follows: ' The North 50 feec of' the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying West of the Gilson Road, end'the South 50 feet o the Southeast 1/4 1,,i~- ........... f the Northwest 1/4 of ; ~ ~u~ ox cbc Gllson Roe 37 South, Range 40 EaSt. d, of Section 36, Township Containing 177.42 acres more or less. A/ND ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM: PARCEL: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Comanence at the SOutheast corner of said ~ection 36; thence N O0"49'16,, E, along the East line of said SectiOn 36, a distance of 1248.84 f~e~ to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following describe4 parcel: Thence N 69°31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet; thence N 29°45'35,, W a distance of 481.50 f t; thence N 31°07'21'' E a distance of 185.73 fee~, thence N 67013'55'' E a of 294 feet more or less to the Mean High ~<ater line of the St. Lucle River. thence Mean High Water line a ~istann, ~ meander Southerly along the natural ......... 688 feet more or less to the intersection with the said East linei!of Section 36; thence S 00°49'16'' W, along said Section line a distance of 471 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10.5 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, S~i. Lucie County, Florida lying North of Becket Road Lucieright-°f-wayacounty, ;l~b2~di~e~e~fB~8s ~o~g:~247' Public Records of St. : ' ght-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 4~3, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Containing 2.51 acres more or less. PARCEL 3: range Being 40 East, all St. thatLucie cPart of Government Lot 3, Section 36m Township 37 Sou~h, ; ounty, Florida, lying South of of-way as described in Deed Book 14 ~ o~ .... Bec~er Road right- 8, -~8= ~,, ~u~Ic Records of St. Lucie County, Plorida; and West of Gilsou Road ~d in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, PublrIght-Of-way as relocated and LESS the South 610.010 feet thereof, ic Records of St. Lucie County, Containing 7.70 acres more or less. Jack C~y Gunster,Yoakley, Criser & Stewart, P.A. t0 Central Pkwy. ,Ste.400 Stuart, Fi. 33497 A H. Wayne Huizenga 901 E. Los Olas Blvd. Pt. Lauderdale, Fl. 33301 OTHER PROPERTY CA~E~ NOTIFIED Parcel 1 Harbour Ridge, Ltd. P.O. Box 2451 Stuart, Fl. 34995 Parcel 2 General Deve!oFr.~en t 1111 S. Bayshore .Dr. Miami, Fi. 33131 Pt. St. Lucie Sec. 38 Blk.2501, Lot 25 Thc~as & Adeliza Caldwell P.O. Box 3572 Jackson, Tn. 38303 Wide Waters S/D,Lot 11 Betty D. Krantz 1450 Bardstown Ann Arbor, Mi. 48105 WAde Waters S/D,Lot 12 Margaret Ray Firhk 2805 @~ail Run Round Rock, Tx. 78681 Wide Waters S/D,Lot 13 William & Martha Jayne 2921 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fl. 34990 Lot i4 Marilyn j. Piechota Clark Ument~u 2901 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fl. 34990 Lot 15 Roger & Matilda Lorraine 3258 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fl. 34990 Lot 16 Joseph & Nih:fa Caleca 131 Park Hill Ave. Massape~, N.Y. 11758 Lot 17 Trmmas & Mayrie Min~ri ~ 737 Carnival Ave. Port St. Lucie, Fl. 34983 LOt 18 a~ma C. Kraft 3239 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fi. 34990 Lot 19 Victor & ~ Ronfeldt P.O. Box .622 Palm City, Fi. 34990 Lot 20 Mark & Jane Hard~ 3286 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fl. 34990 LOt 21 Kenneth & Patricia Miller 401 N. River Dr.#1-B Stuart, Fl. 34994 Lot 22 Prank & Julia Pulliam 1340 N.W. T~_keside Tr. Stuart, Fl. 34994 Lot 23 Pa/miro & To, ina Carrara 2641 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, FI. 34990 Lot 29 Florence E. Kennedy 3327 Perimeter Nd. Palm City, Fl. 34990 Susan p. Cochran & et al c/o Bess~ner Securities Corp. 249 Royal Palm Way Palm Beach, FL 33480 Michael & Ruby Lazor P. O. Box 95-2998 Stuart, FL 34945 Leland C. Pearce 250 Buckhead Ridae Okeechotee, FL 334 John & Berkey Hannett c/o Berkey & Erickson (PA) 500 N. Woodward Ave. Blocrafeld Hills, MI 48013 W T W V, Inc. P. O. Box 350 Tupelo, MS 38801 Martyn Tract Partnerst~D c/o Jacob Stein 20 Jerusalem Ave., Ste. 302 Hicksville, NY 11801 D. O. Investment Co. c/o R. A. Wilcox 1483 Via Miguel Jupiter, FL 33458 Andrew L ester Dorothy L ester 3135 Segovia Coral Gables. FL 33134 R~ery & Sophie Thcnm~s -5060 N. Ocean Drive Riviera Beach, FL 33403 Brasilino Filipe (Tr) P. O. Box 1833 Stuart, FL 34945 . Eduardo Correia ('Ir) 21 Bob-O-Link Northport, NY 11768 Juan I. Ribas c/o Robert David 1393 $. W. First St., Ste. 29~ M/ami, FL 33135 Wm. F. Koch, Jr. (Tr) 900 E. Atlantic Ave. Delray Beach, FL 33444 Jack & Frank Roberts 6640 S. W. 99 Ave. Miami, FL 33165 Roberts Fish Farm P. O. Box 65-38 Miami, FL 33165 Jack & R. F. R~s 6640 S. W. 99 Ave. '.M~, FL 33165 Primo Farinon (Est) & et al 1673 S. E. 21 Ave. Pcmlsano Beach, FL 33062. ~rao~ Cro~ 24 ~%~lt St. Glen Cove, NY 11542 Ki~linger Washington Edts. Inc. 1729 H STreet N. W. Wa~_hington, DC 20006 ~ ~t 31 'Mark & Judith Soverel 3315 Per/~ter Rd. Pa]~n City, Fl. 34990 James & Linda Davis 11367 S.W. 167th St. Miami, Fl. 33157 Robert H. Oldland Martin Co. Administrator 50 Kindred St. Stuart, FL 34997 Tc~n Kenny Chairman, Martin Co. Board of County Ccranission 50 Kindred St. Stuart, FL 34997 St.Lucie Co. AdmLn. B_ Road Right-of-Way,?-.__ 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Fi. 3495_ Dir. Caaaunity Deveiop~_n-_ 50 Kindred St. . STuart, F1 34997 'C OSC ORAN6E SU BLUE CL GREEN RL BROWN SU TO RL SU TO CG 4O PETITION OF H. WAYNE HUIZENGA BY AGENT: JACK CARMODY TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FROM SU TO RL AND AR-I RS-4 PUD GU RED BROWN BLUE GREEN ~AR-1 TO RL ~ AR-1 TO 36-37-40 i PETITION OF H. WAYNE HUIZENGA BY AGENT: JACK CARMODY TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FROM SU TO RL AND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ~' '~:-, · ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA f · .... SPECI~ ~ETING APPROVAL MIN~ES NO--ER 10, 1987 BOARD M~ERS PRESENT~ J' P' Terpening, Mabel Fawsett, Joseph Sciturro, Robert Carman, Patricia Ferrlck Jim Russakis, King, and Jo Ann Allen. ' Patricia BOARD ~ERS ~SENT: Peggy Harris - Excused due to illness. OTHERS P~SENT: Krista Storey, Assistant County Attorney; Dennis J. Murphy, Planning Administrator; Terry Hess, Plannin~ and Z°nln9 Director; Donna Scanlon, Assistant Planner; La~a Gri99s_ McElhaney, Assistant Planner; and Dolores Messer, Secretly. P~SS ATTEND~CE: Susan Burgess' Ft. Pierce News Tribes. TAPES: 1, 2, and 3. TIME: 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Petition of H. Wayne Huizenga to amend the ~uture Land Usa Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) and CG 'Ceneral Commercial Development).. for property locat~ on the,east side of Gilson Road at its intersect'ion with Becket Road. __ st.Pr°perty'lieSLucie River.al°ng the west shoreline of the North Fork of th%~?:~"': Mr. Jack C~ ~d ~ ~ pr~s~gt~d petit~sn' He said rm y, E~ u, e, the although Staf~ had favorably reviewed th ad3acent propert owner . _ e Detitlo~, concer D.~ _~~ ~=u peen Drought to his atten+~]-~u~°n s CO~rcial~ ,-=~ concerns of nei~h~k .... '~u"- uue to these wit = ~~ properties --m-~-- ~a~ th~ CG ~and use request.. ~ ~,,~_C~r~dy {equested ~ draw=~ involves Parcels 1_ 2 ~,~ ~ -~~ sa~ thls with- - , .... ~. an response to questioning by Mr. Murphy, Mr. Carmody replied that the SU (Semi Urb~/~) land use classification would remain in the two parcels located west of Gilson Road. He said the remaining property is intended for a private marina. Mr. Murphy said that RL is a sufficient land category for a marina for the private uss of the residents of the project. i~c~ited northerly Of the subject parcel and Harbor Ridge is located to the northwest. General Development Corporation owns the [~roperty located to the west of Gilson Road. H6 further st. ated that the petitioner wishes to come back at a later date wi~h a PUD application, and intends to apply for density of 1. to 2 units per acre° The petitioner is presently negotiating for an additional parcel of land (approximately 100 acres) located in Nartin County, 20 acres of which is located in St. Lucia County. PUD's will be applied for in both counties. Plans will include a golf community similar to Harbour Ridge. Regardin~ public services in the area, negotiations are bein~ made for additional services, specifically fire, ambulance ser- vices, and sewage. These issues may be addressed at the time the .pUD application is made. Martin Downs Utilities has made appli~ cation to Martin County for an extension into the subject area. Hartin County has some concern regarding the road system because the access to the development will be primarily through Martin County over the Palm City Bridge. ~,~r. Lester Boese, Vice President of Harbor Ridge, Ltd., said that his organization would like to see the development be handled as a PUD in the future, as it would conform with surrounding zoning designations. ~r. Albert Falk, assistant to the President of the Wide Waters Property Owners Association, said there is concern of future density being designated for up to 5 units per acre. t4r. Virgil Smith, President of Greenbriar Village Homeowners Association at Harbor Ridge, said they would oppose a PUD appli- ca~ion if it would significantly increase the population density of the area. : ~ro William Atterberry, a resident of Gilson Road, reiterated comments made by Messrs. Boese, Falk and Smith. Regarding Staff comments, IMr. Murphy said Staff has no objection to the request for land use designation change from SU to The' granting of this request would offer the petitioner the opportunity t6 reappear before this Board with specific develop- ment plans. Comments from the Dept. of Co~uni!ty Affairs, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Dept. of Natural Resources, and SFWMD indicate general concurrence with Staff's recommendation of approval.. The project development impacts would be addressed by both Martin County officials and City of Port St. Lucia officials due to its unique geographical location. SFWMD and DNR have expressed concerns regarding potential en- vironmental impacts at this site. There are extensive wetland communities throughout' this area, both internal .and adjacent to %he St Lucie River These issues would addressed ~ t lnal development plan reviews. }~earing no further public cogent in favor of the petition, Chairman Terpening closed the public°r inportionOppositiOnof hearing. Considering the petitioner's presentation and Staff comments, Mr. Carman made a motion that Ordinance No. 87-95, adjusting Parcels 1, 2, and 3 for withdrawal from the CG land use designation request, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a reco~mnendation of approval. Mrs. King seconded the motion, and upon roll call, the Board voted unanimously in favor of the motion. Chairman Terpening informed the petitioner that the petition will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recom- mendation of approval, including the above-mentioned adjustment. The hearing adjourned at 11:25 P.M. UNOFFICI. ,L- CT TO STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2571 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST · BOB MARTINEZ TAILAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399 THOMAS G. PELHAM September 14, 1987 Se, r,'lar¥ Honorable Jim Minix Chairman Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 33482-5652 Dear Mr. Minix: Pursuant to section 163.318'4, Florida-Statutes, the Department of Community Affairs has reviewed the amendments County.pr°p°sed for the Growth Management Policy Plan for St. Lucie ' 'Our 'review indicated that the . ~irements of section 163.3177,~?P°~d .a~.endments met the however, the amendments were _~'~!,.~zorl~a Statutes, ~uu am£ lnternally consistent with the plan as required by section 163.3177 Amendment f, which rolo commercial tourist P~_s~t? change a_ semi-urban area s_ with ~r~an ways. Inte~,~ = ~=u ~y section 163.3177(2), The p~oposed use for this property of a 700 unit recreational vehicle park exceeds the D ~m~en~? from the Treasure Coast ~-J~--~ ~gres~°ld_f°r this use. ,~n other review agencies a ~ ~u~,~x ~lannlng ouncil alon ~=. re ~nclosed for your -~-:~ . g ~u~s~x~eration and Amendments for your comprehensive plans w~ich occur after September 1987 should adhere to ~he requirements of section 9J- 11.014, Florida Administrative Code. Copies of Chapter 9J-11, Florida Administrative Code, which have been mailed to all local governments become effective September 22, 1987 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT · HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT · RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Honorable Jim Minix September 14, 1987 Page Two If we can be of further assistance, please contact Mr. Ralph Hook488-0410. at (904) 487-4545 or Mr. John McKirchy, Senior Attorney, at WP/rhr Enclosure cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council S~ely_, W°°~irector Di~ i~anna°g~mRee~c~ Planning August 21, 1987 councll Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department of Co~unity Affairs Bureau of Local Resource Planning 2571 Executive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, FL 32301 Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Documents Dear Mr. Hook' Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Plan and Lano Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, Treasure Coas: Regional Planning Council reviewed the amendments to th~ Lucie County Future Land Use Element at its regular meeting on August 1987. The following comments were approved by Council for transmittal to State Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Sections 163,3184(1) an~ (2), Florida Statutes, for consideration by the County prior adoption of the document. Evaluation The proposed amenaments to the Future Land Use Element have been revi in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statu Council's review procedures, and Council's adopted comprehensive plan. followiny commeqts'are offered as a result of that review. .Based on the information provided, the proposed amendments do not appear to be in conflict or inconsistent with the policies contained in the Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan. Prior to the approval of the land use changes associated with Items A and B, the appropriate analysis should be completed demonstrating that U.S. I has the available capacity to accommodate the additional highway trips. The analysis should al'so" demonstrate that an acceptable level of service can--be maintained on U.S. 1 at buildout of the area. Also, Indian River County has expressed concerns over increased strip commercial development along U'.S. I (see attached letter). Prior to approving the land use change associated with Item St. Lucie County should work with the City of Port St. Lucie and Martin County to assure that all multijurisdictional transpor- tation impacts are adequately addressed (see the attached letter from Martin County). Furthermore, because this parcel is ka~n t. Norms 3228 s.w. ma~n downs b~d. ~ite 205 · p.o. box 1529 ~airman palm ci~, flo~da 33490 ~omas g kenny III ~hon~ ~30S/286-3313 daniel ~c~ta~/t~asurcr Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department of Community Affairs August 21, 1987 Page Two adjacent to the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Aquatic Preserve, development of this property should be consistent with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Management Plan for this aquatic preserve. A letter from the DNR is attached which .expressesthis parcel, concerns over the ~ossible development of a marina on The proposed 700 space Recreational Vehicle Park associated with Item F exceeds the DRI threshold. The 100 percent DRI threshold is 5uO spaces. Because of public objections to the proposed project (see attached letters) and because regional issues have not been identified, final consideration of the proposed land use change to Commercial Tourist should, perhaps, wait until a report and recommendations can be developed that evaluate regional issues. For Item F, some of the regional issues of concern are related to land use compatibility, the provision of services, and the impact on water resources. The proposed density of up to 9 units/acre may not be compatible with the surrounding agricultural land use. The 76.7 acre parcel does not seem large enough to allow this density and provide adequate buffers from noise and pesticides associated with nearby agricultural activities. Regional concerns are also warranted with regard to water supply and sewage disposal. This is especially important when recreational vehicles are involved, because an overnight visitor to the park may leave behind several days worth of wastewater and take several days worth of fresh water when leaving. Finally, this site is very close to Tenmile Creek which drains into the North Fork of the St. Lucie River. Depending on the design of the drainage system and wastewater facilities, a development of this intensity may have an adverse impact on the quality and quantity of water entering the North Fork of the St. Lucie River and Aquatic Preserve. If you need additional__ information Daniel M. Cary Executive Director or have any questions, please do not OMC:ks Attachments S outh Florida Water Management f).:~.~t (.)lf~, E~ox 24(;80 :~301 Gun C!u~ Flo~d ",V~ ~;' P~I!:~ Beficl Florida '~ .... 416-4680 klO~d;~ WATS Line District october 14, 1987 Mr. Terry L. Hess, AICP Planning Administrator St. Lucie County County Administration Building 2300 Virginia Avenue, ROom 203 Ft. Pierce, Florida 334~2-5652 Dear Mr. Hess: OCT I 5 Subject: St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan Amendments SFWMD RFc 87-139 District staff have reviewed the eight proposed ~ommlssl~P?h?sive Plan which will be considered amendments to by the St. Lucie oners on December 1, 1987. Ple · Board related to the environmental a~-:~ _~se co~slder the following -~-~o of the amendments: Items A_ 8, Ct D and F: No comment Item F: The proposal for 700 recreational vehicle {R¥) sites exceeds ~h---F~old of 500 RV sites. This site is located just north of Ten Mi shouldThe creekbe protected.fl°°dDlain and hammock located on the site appear to be i / The site is also loca landfill which has been p If on-site water supplie potential water quality i Item G: The presence of ~ be evaluated pr development orders· ted apProximately two miles east of a sludge ermitted by the Department of Environmental s are proposed for this project, the locatio~ ~pacts of the landfill should be carefully consi solated wetlands on this site and their or to the approval of necessary rezoning Item H: T~e site appears to contain wetlands t ~.~e~: as w~ll as isolated wetlands The .... ~ ~r~ par~ of a larger ~.:b ~ne applicant nro-o~g- ~ ...... -.._ . ~uneral Information rovi ed i well ....... ' ~ o~o ~u ~reserve two extensive wetland ~yste~s on · .~; ~r~?~g ne~ uetland areas ..: ,,. While this is encourage, ~f~;.~P~c.?.mm~n~s and recommendatzons ~,, ~ ...... ~-- --~.~- .ur a u, str,c~ Surface Water Management ~,r;~t =au, at the Nancy H Roen JD York Cha rrnan - Planh)l~or ¥~Co (-,ha,rn~gn - Palm C,ly Oscar M C'~rn~r ,j~ Arson ~ MHiar) Fritz Sle~n ~[ Myers M~,~ rn l~elte Gh~:; e James F Garner M,ko Terry L. Hess October 14, 1987 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding these comments or if I can .provide any additional information or assistance, please don't hesitate to call. cc: TCRPC Ralph Hook - DCA Sincerely, David B. Thatcher Development Review Coordinator Resource Control Department ORDINANCE NO. 87-95 FILE NO. PA-BY-14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 86-01 BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTy LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY ON THE ST. LUCIE RIVER, EAST OF THE BECKER ROAD AND SOUTH OF PERIMETER ROAD (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN) FROM SU (SEMI-URBAN) TO RL (RESIDENTIAL ~OW DENSITY DEVELOPMENT) AND CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL MAKING FINDINGS~ PROVIDING FOR MAKING THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND ADOPTION. WHEREAS, the Board of Co~nty Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. H. Wayne Huizenga, by Agent: Jack Carmody presented a petition to amend the future land use classification set forth in the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi- Urban) to RL (Residential Low Density Development) and CG (Commercial General) for the property described below. 2. The St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency, after holding a public hearing on November 10, 1987 of which due notice was published at least seven (7) days prior to said hearing and all owners of property within five hundred feet (500') .were notified by mail of said hearing, has recommended that the Board amend the future land use classification set forth in the St. Lucie County Growth Management Plan from SU (Semi-Urban) to RL (Residential Low Density Development) and CG (Commercia! General) for the property described below. S. The Board held a public hearing on December !, 19~.7, ~_~er publishing anoclce~' of such hearlng in the Fort Pierce N'ews · ~ibune on November 24, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by Commissioners of ST. Lucie County, Florida: Lucie described as follows: the Board of Coun~v A. CHANGE IN FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION. The future land use classification set forth in the St. County Growth Management Policy Plan for that property Com~.ence at the Sou[beast corner of said Sec[ion 36, thence S ~ ~ 30" 88 3~ W along the Sou~h line of said Sect/on 36, a distance of 1763.46 £~e~ to ~he POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described centerllne =hence K 17°30'20" W a d!s=ance of 890.2& feet to the beginning of a concave Ues~eriy, having a radius of 1000.00 feeE and ~ central angle o 7~35,57,,. - , :hence Northerly along the arc of said curve, a dislance of 132.63 fee% to ~he end of said curve; thence N 25~D6'17., W~ a distance of 1254.85 fem~ %o =he intersection ~ith the West line of said Goverr~en~ Lot 3. Also ie~s that right-off,ay for ~eck~- Road as recorde~ in Deed foiio~s:l&8' page 2&7, Public Records of st. ~ucle'Counry, Florida, described The North 50 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying West of the ti!son Road, and the South 50 feet of the Northwest !/~ of the Southeast 1/4 lying ~es~ of the ~iison Road of Section 3£ io~nship 37 South,~Range 40 ~asc. ' , Con:aining 177.&2 acres more or less. ;2~D~S0 LESS AND ~CEPTING TH.?~:rr . - ~zm~ O~ the Io~lo.~-- · _.. z .... 7~-~ fe~: :O · . ~ c-s~anc~ of ~8].56 '~ee~- t.;'- ....... ,,, -, .... ~'" - res mo.e or less. being a parcel cf land lying in . . uove.nmen: Lo: 4, Section 36, To~rnship 3' South, 5ange &0 East, SC. Lucle County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; :hence g 00°&9'!6" ~, along :he East line of said Sec:ion.36, a distance cf 12iS.Si feet to the ?OLAF OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel Thence ~ 69031,3.6,, W a dis:ante of 6&6.75 fee:], Thence N 29'45'35' W a dis:ante of 481.50 feet; :hence N 31'07'21" E a dis:ante of 185.73 feez; thence N 67°!3'§5" E $ distance of 294 feet more or legs :o the Mean ~igh ~ater llne of the St. Lucie River: :hence meander Southerly along :he natural Mean High Water line a distance of 688 feet more or legs to :he in:ersec.--!onmr!th The said Ea:s~'!!~e of Sec:ion 36; ~ce 00'&'9'16" ~, along said Section !~e a dlszance of &Yl feet more or les: to :he POIhT OF BEGI~NG. Conualu~g 10.5 acres ~e ~ less. Scull kanf~ AC~ ~as~ S~ ~ ~. . , rio~ . , ,o~ki~ ~: ' ~, . oU~le County . ~da ~vlng North of Beeper koa~ rzgh:-of-w~v as described 2n beeC Book 148, Ma~e 247, PuRiSt Keccrd~ cf S:. Lucle C~untv, ~iorida; and West of Gilson koad right-cf-way.as relocated and recmrded in O.K. book &63, Page 450, Pubic Records of St. Ln~ie County, Florida. Containing 2.5t Acres more or less. · Being all :ha: part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 Past, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of becket Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 14S, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lncie County, Ficrridz; and W~s~ of Citson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. boor 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucia County, Florida LESS the South 6!0.00 fee: thereof. Cc~n~g 7.70 acres more or iess~ PARCelS i, 2 and 3 containing 20.7! acres more. or less. 37 Souzh,BeingP~ngea parcel40 ~asu,°f lands:. !y!m~ in gove.--nme~t Lot 4, Section 36, To--as Ip~ describe~ ~$ fc~._io~$: Lucre County, Florida, being more par:icuia.~l~i ~ ~lmmg :ha ~.as: ~ ~f maid Sear_imm 36. a ~ce of ~1.2~ fee: ~ zing ~ ~: ~ of ~ve~n: Lo: 4 m g~nce of 1956.57 feet along ~ne NorLk line of G~a~mem: Lo: 4. a disz~ce of 680 fee:, more l~, :o =he wazers of :he $:. Lucia P~ver; thence me.der said S~:~as=er!9- along ~h. natural Mean High ~r !%ne-of ~ ~a~ ~ver a dis=~ce cf 1080 ~ee:, more or le~. to ~he ~: of ~:ersec:i~ ~:h ~e af~id ~: ~e of Sec~ 36, ~ence S' O0"~9'OO" W along ~ ~s:~l~a, a dis:~me of 1200.07 ~ TO~--~T~?~ ~-TM rfme fmll~g ~escri~ed par=e~ (Location: At the southeasLern ~rner of St. Lucie County on the S%'. Lucie River, eas~ of the end of Becket Road and south of Perimeter Road.) owned by H. Wayne Huizenga, be, and the same is hereby changed from SU (Semi-Urban) to RL (Residential Low Density Deveiopment~ and CG Commercial General). B. FINDING OF CONSISTENCY. This Board specifically determines that the approved change in future land use plan is consistent with the policies and objectives contained in the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan. C. CHANGES TO ZONING MAP. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the changes to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this ordinance. D. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are~hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. E. SEUERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property or circumstances, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property or circumstances, F. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be Paragraph A. applicable as stated in G. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and hereby is directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. H. FILING WITH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. The County Attorney shall send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301. I. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon receipt cf official acknowledgment from the Office of Secretary of State that this ordinance has been filed in that office. J. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Jack Krieger Vice-Chairman Havert L. Fenn Commissioner R. Dale Trefe!ner Commissioner Jim Minix Commissioner Judy Culpepper XX XX XX XX XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this ist day of December, 1987. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY' COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTy, FLORIDA CLERK / By: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTy ATTORNEY PLANNING D ZONING COMMISSi~ON LOCA~,-,~LANN~'NG AGENCY ST, LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 10, 1987 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: J- P. 'Terpening, Mabel Fawsett, Joseph Sciturro, Robert Carman, Patricia Ferrick Jim Russakis Patricia King, and Jo Ann Allen. ' · BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Peggy Harris - EXcused due to illness. OTHERS PRESENT: Krista Storey, Assistant County Attorney; Dennis J. Murphy, Planning Administrator; Terry Hess, Planning and Zoning Director; Donna Scanlon, Assistant Planner; Laura Griggs- McElhaney, Assistant Planner; and Dolores Messer, Secretary. PRESS ATTENDANCE: Susan Burgess, Ft. Pierce News Tribune. TAPES: 1, 2, and 3. TIME: ~:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Petition of-H. Wayne Huizenga to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) and CG fGeneral Commercial Development) for property located on the east side of Gilson Road at its intersect'ion with Backer Road. -- property lies along the west shoreline of the North Fork o St. Lucia River. f th~,~ Mr. Jack Carmody, Esquire, presented the petition. He said although Staff had favorably reviewed the petition, concerns b~ adjacent property owners relative to the petition's co~ercial~z request had been brought to his attention. Due to these legit~ ma~e concerns of neighboring properties, ~. Carmody requested ~~ withdraw the CG land use request. Mr. Murphy said this with- drawal involves Parcels 1, 2, and 3. In response to questioning by Mr. Murphy, Mr. Carmody replied that the SU (Semi Urban) land use classification would remain in the two parcels located west of Gilson Road. He said the remaining property is intended for a private marina. Mr. Murphy said that RL is a sufficient land us~ ' category for a marina for the private use of the residents of the pro3ect. Mr. Carmody then explained that the subject property is located near Harbour Rid~' and Wide Waters subdivisi~~. Wide Waters is located northerly~f the subject parcel, and~rbor Ridge is located to the northwest. General Development Corporation owns the property located to the west of Gilson Road. He further stated that the petitioner wishes to come back at a later date w~th a PUD application, and intends to apply for density of 1, to 2 units per acre. The petitioner is presently negotiating for an additional parcel of land (approximately 100 acres) located in Martin County, 20 acres of which is located in St. Lucie County. PUD's will be applied for in both counties. Plans will include a golf community similar to Harbour Ridge. Regarding public services in the area, negotiations are being made for additional services, specifically fire, ambulance ser- vices, and sewage. These issues may be addressed at the time the PUD application is made. Martin Downs Utilities has made appli- cation to Martin County for an extension into the subject area. Martin County has some concern regarding the road system because the access to the development will be primarily through Martin CounTy over the Palm City Bridge. Mr. Le.ster Boese, Vice President of Harbor Ridge, Ltd., said that his organization would like to see the development be handled as a PUD in the future, as it would conform with surrounding zoning designations. . Mr. Albert Falk, assistant to the President of the Wide Waters Property OWners Association, said there is concern of future density being designated for up to 5 units per acre. Mr. Virgil Smith, President of Greenbriar Village Homeowners Association at Harbor Ridge, said they would oppose a PUD appli- cation if it would significantly increase the population density of the area. Mr. William Atterberry, a resident of Gilson Road, reiterated comments made by Messrs. Boese, Falk and Smith. Regarding Staff comments, Mr. Murphy said Staff has no objection to the request for land use designation change from SU to RL. The granting of this request would offer the petitioner the opportunity to reappear before this Board with specific develop- ment plans. Comments from the Dept. of Com~aunity Affairs, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Dept. of Natural Resources, and SFWMD indicate general concurrence with Staff's recommendation of appreval. The project development impacts would be addressed by both Martin County officials and City of Port St. Lucie officials due to its unique geographical location. SFWMD and DNR have expressed concerns regarding potential en- vironmental impacts at this site. There are extensive wetland communities throughout' this area, both internal and adjacent to the St. ~ucie River. These issues would be addressed at of final development plan reviews. }{earing no further public comment in favor of or in opposition the petition, Chairman Terpening closed the public portion of hearing. Considering the petitioner's presentation and Staff comments, Mr Carman made a motion that Ordinance No. 87-95, adjusting Parcels' 1, 2, and 3 for withdrawal from the CG land use designation request, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Mrs. King seconded the motion, and upon roll call, the Board voted unanimously in favor of the motion. the t i~e 5~.-4 Chairman Terpening informed the petitioner that the petition will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recom- mendation of approval, including the above-mentioned adjustment. The hearing adjourned at 11:25 P.M. UNOFFICI.A L- S!.tBJE T TO PLANNING & ZONING PARCEL 1: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'16'' E, along the East line of said Section~36, a distance of 1248.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel: Thence N 69°31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet; thence N 29°45'35'' W a distance of 481.50 feet; thence N 31°07'21'' E a distance of 185.73 feet; thence N 67°13'55'' E a distance of 294 feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River: thence meander Southerly along the natural Mean High Water line a distance of 688 feet more or less to the intersection with the said East-line of Section 36; thence S 00°49'16" W, along said Section line a-distance of 471 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10.5 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida lying North of Becker Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way,as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Containing 2.51 Acres more or less. PARCEL 3: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of Becker Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right'of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida LESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containing 7.70 acres more or less. PARCELS 1, 2 and 3 containing 20.71 acres more or less. Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'00" E along the East line of said Section 36, a distance of 641.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 89°15'25'' W a distance of 1320.66 feet to the West line of Government Lot 4 of said Section 36; thence N 00°47'39'' E along the West line of Government Lot 4 a distance of 1956.57 feet to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4; thence N 89°05'04'' E along the North line of Government Lot 4, a distance of 680 feet, more or less, to the waters of the St. Lucie River; thence meander said waters Southeasterly along the natural Mean High Water line of the said St. Lucie River a distance of 1080 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with the aforesaid East line of Section 36, thence S 00o49'00'' W along said East line, a distance of 1200.07 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH the following described parcel: Being all of Government Lot 2 and all of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Less that portion of the 80 feet wide right-of-way of Gilson Road, as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, lying in said Government Lot 3, the center line of which being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence S 88°35'30'' W along the South line of said Section 36, a distance of 1763.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described centerline; thence N 17°30'20'' W a distance of 890.24 feet to the beginning of a curve, concave Westerly, having a radius of 1000.00 feet and a central angle of 7°35'57"; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, a distance of 132.63 feet to the end of said curve; thence N 25°06'17'' W, a distance of 1254.85 feet to the intersection with the West line of said Government Lot 3. Also less that right-of-way for Becker Road as recorded in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of st. Lucie County, Florida, descr%bed as follows: The North 50 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying West of the Gilson Road, and the South 50 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying west of the Gilson Road, of Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East. Containing 177.42 acres more or less. AND ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM: PARCEL 1: ~ Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: · Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'16'' E, along the East line of said Section 36, a distance of 1248.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel: Thence N 69°31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet; thence N 29°45~35'' W a distance of 481.50 feet; thence N 31°07'21'' E a distance of 185.73 feet, thence N 67o13'55'' E a distance of 294 feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River; thence meander Southerly along the natural Mean High Water line a distance of 688 feet more or less to the intersection with the said East line of Section 36; thence S 00°49'16'' W, along said Section line a distance of 471 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10.5 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida lying North of Becker Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records Of St. Lucie County, Florida. Containing 2.51 acres more or less. PARCEL 3: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of Becker Road right- of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. LESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containing 7.70 acres more or less. 2 of 2 Jack Carmody Gunster,Yoakley,Criser & Stewart, P.A. 10 Central Pkwy.,Ste.400 Stuart, Fl. 33497 A H. Wayne Huizenga 901E. Los Olas Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, Fi. 33301 PROPERTY OWNERS IN PETITIONED AREA OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIED Parcel 1 Harbour Ridge, Ltd. P.O. Box 2451 Stuart, Fl. 34995 Parcel 2 General Develo~nent Corp. 1111S. Bayshore Dr. Miami, Fi. 33131 Pt.St.Lucie Sec.38 Blk.2501, Lot 25 Thomas & Adeliza Caldwell P.O. Box 3572 Jackson, Tn. 38303 Wide Waters S/D,Lot 11 Betty D. Krantz 1450 Bardstown Ann Arbor, Mi. 48105 Wide Waters S/D,Lot 12 Margaret Ray Fink 2805 Quail R~n Round Rock, Tx. 78681 Wide Waters S/D,Lot 13 William & Martha Jayne 2921 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fl. 34990 Lot 14 Marilyn J. Piechota Clark Umentt~n 2901 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fi. 34990 Lot 15 Roger & Matilda Lorraine 3258 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fl. 34990 Lot 16 Joseph & Ninfa Caleca 131 Park Hill Ave. Massapequa, N.Y. 11758 Lot 17 Thomas & MayrieMinori 737 Carnival Ave. Port St. Lucie, Fl. 34983 Lot 18 Anna C. Kraft 3239 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fi. 34990 Lot 19 Victor & Norma Ronfeldt P.O. Box 622 Palm City, Fl. 34990 Lot 20 Mark & Jane Hardage 3286 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fi. 34990 Lot 21 Kenneth & PatriciaMiller 401 N. River Dr.#1-B Stuart, Fi. 34994 Lot 22 Frank & Julia Pulliam 1340 N.W. Lakeside Tr. Stuart, Fi. 34994 Lot 23 Palmiro & Tonina Carrara 2641 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fl. 34990 Lot 29 Florence E. Kennedy 3327 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, Fi. 34990 MARTIN~COUNTY PROPERTY OWNERS NOT,TIED Susan p. Cochran & et al c/o Bessemer Securities Corp. 249 Royal Palm Way Palm Beach, FL 33480 Michael & Ruby Lazor P. O. Box 95-2998 Stuart, FL 34945 Leland C. Pearce 250 Buckhead Ridge Okeechohee, FL 33472 John & Berkey Hannett c/o Berkey & Erickson (PA) 500 N. Woodward Ave. Bloomfeld Hills, MI 48013 W T W V, Inc. P. O. Box 350 Tupelo, MS 38801 Martyn Tract Partnership c/o Jacob Stein 20 Jerusalem Ave., Ste. 302 Hicksville, NY 11801 D. O. Investment Co. c/o R. A. Wilcox 1483 ViaMiguel Jupiter, FL 33458 Andrew Lester Dorothy Lester 3135 Segovia Coral Gables. FL 33134 Emery & Sophie Thomas 5060 N. Ocean Drive Riviera Beach, FL 33403 Brasilino Filipe (Tr) P, O. Box 1833 Stuart, FL 34945 Eduardo Corre~a (Tr) 21 Bob-O-Link Northport, NY 11768 Juan I. Ribas c/o Robert David 1393 S. W. First St., Ste. 200 Miami, FL 33135 Wm. F. Koch, Jr. (Tr) 900 E. Atlantic Ave. DelrayBeach, FL 33444 Jack & Frank Roberts 6640 S. W. 99 Ave. Miami, FL 33165 Roberts Fish Farm P. O. Box 65-38 Miami, FL 33165 Jack & R. F. Roberts 6640 S. W. 99 Ave. Miami, FL 33165 Primo Farinon (Est) & et al 1673 S. E. 21 Ave. Pompano Beach, FL 33062 Grace Crowe 24 Roosevelt St. Glen Cove, NY 11542 Kiplinger Washington Edts. Inc. 1729 H STreet N. W. Washington, DC 20006 ~ot 30 Mark & Judith Soverel 3315 Perimeter Rd. Palm City, F1.34990 James & Linda Davis 11367 S.W. 167th St. Miami, Fi. 33157 "County Roads St.Lucie Co.Admin.Bldg. Road Right-of-Way, Rm.208A 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 34982 Robert H. Oldland Martin Co. Administrator 50 Kindred St. Stuart, FL 34997 Tom Kenny Chairman, Martin Co. Board of County Commission 50 Kindred St. Stuart, FL 34997 Rob Alcott Dir. Community Develop~nent 50 Kindred St. STuart, F1 34997 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION6RS November 9, 1987 DCVCLOPM( NT DIR( CTOR J. GARY AMENT In compliance with the provisions of the Florida Statutes, you are hereby advised that H. Wayne Huizenga, by Agent: Jack Carmody, has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) and CG (General Commercial Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: At the southeastern corner of St. Lucie County on the St. Lucie River, east of the end of Becket Road and south of Perimeter Road.) A public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, December 1, 1987, in Room 101, St. Lucie County Admin- istration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. If you should have any questions, additional information may be obtained by calling Area Code 305, 466-1100, Extension 331. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ja~Krieg~r,~ Chairman FILE NO. PA-87-014 HAVERT L. FENN, District No. t · JUDY CULPEPPER, District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. DALE ]'REFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5 County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue ® Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Director: Ext. 398 · Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 3t6 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317 PARCEL 1: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'16'' E, along the East line of said Section~36, a distance of 1248.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel: Thence N 69°31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet; thence N 29°45'35'' W a distance of 481.50 feet; thence N 31°07'21'' E a distance of 185.73 feet; thence N 67°13'55'' E a distance of 294 feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River: thence meander Southerly along the natural Mean High Water line a distance of 688 feet more or less to the intersection with the said East'line of Section 36; thenCe S 00°49'16'' W, along said Section line.amdistance of 471 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10.5 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida lying North of Becker Road right-Of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County,~Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way,as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County~ Florida. Containing 2.51 Acres more or less. PARCEL 3: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of Becker Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public R~cords of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right'of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida LESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containing 7.70 acres more or less. PARCELS 1, 2 and 3 containing 20.71 acres more or less. Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'00'' E along the East line of said Section 36, a distance of 641.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 89°15'25'' W a distance of 1320.66 feet to the West line of' Government Lot 4 of said Section 36; thence N 00°47'39'' E along the West line of Government Lot 4 a distance of 1956.57 feet to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4; thence N 89°05'04" E along the North line of Government Lot 4, a distance of 680 feet, more or less, to the waters of the St. Lucie River; thence meander said waters Southeasterly along the natural Mean High Water line of the said St. Lucie River a distance of 1080 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with the aforesaid East line of Section 36, thence S 00°49'00'' W along said East line, a distance of 1200.07 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH the following described parcel: Being all of Government Lot 2 and all of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Less that portion of the 80 feet wide right-of-way of Gilson Road, as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463~ Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, lying in said Government Lot 3, the center line of which being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence S 88°35'30'' W along the South line of said Section 36, a distance of 1763.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described centertine; thence N 17°30'20'' W a distance of 890.24 feet to the beginning of a curve, concave Westerly, having a radius of 1000.00 feet and a central angle of 7°35'57"; thence Northerly along the arc of said ~urve, a distance of 132.63 feet to the end of said curve; thence N 25°06'17'' W, a distance of 1254.85 feet to the intersection with the West line of said Government Lot 3. Also less that right-of-way for Becker Road as recorded in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of st. Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: The North 50 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying West of the Gilson Road, and the South 50 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying west of the Gilson Road, of Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East. Containing 177.42 acres more or less. ~D ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM: PARCEL 1: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'16'' E, along the East line of said Section 36, a distance of 1248.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel: Thence N 69°31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet; thence N 29°45'~35'' W a distance of 481.50 feet; thence N 31°07'21'' E a distance of 185.73 feet, thence N 67°13'55'' E a distance of 294 feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River; thence meander Southerly along the natural Mean High Water line a distance of 688 feet more or less to the intersection with the said East line of Section 36; thence S 00°49'16'' W, along said Section line a distance of 471 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10a5 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida lying North of Becker Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148,. Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Containing 2.51 acres more or less. PARCEL 3: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of Becker Road right- of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way, as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. LESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containing 7.70 acres more or less. 2 of 2 THE NEWS TRIBUNE Before the undersigned authority persona~y appeared James J, McMillen or Kathleen K. LeClair, who on oath says that he/she is Publisher, Publisher's Secretary of The News Tribune, a daily newspaper published at Fort Pierce in St. Lucia County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement;, being a.....n..o..t..i..c.~ ................. in the matter of....R..e.~.r..e..a..t.i.P.n. .............................. was published in said newspaper in the issues of .......... ........................ ~.1. Z2,.9./..8.? .................................. use of land within the area shown ~ of County Colllmisstoners an Adminl~ration ~ng, 2300 Virginia : elect~onlcatly recorded. If a , maiter l~ose, he may r asad ev/dence Dlvt~on. Room 201, FLORIDA a~d Dtorth U.S. 1, ttgh~y, appro.,dmately 1/4 mile Road, ap~tety 1/~ ~ south of 1, at La Buona Oene~: Located at the intersecIlon of Ollson PT.ANNING AND ~.ONING OMMISSION LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA & ZONING SPECIAL MEETING APPROVAL MINUTES NO~E~ 10, 1987 BOARD ~ERS PRESENT: J. P. Terpening, Mabel Fawsett, Joseph Sciturro, Robert Carman, Patricia Ferrick Jim Russakis, Patricia King, and Jo Ann Allen. ' BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Peggy Harris - Excused dUe to illness. OTHERS PRESENT: Krista Storey, Assistant County Attorney; Dennis J. Murphy, Planning Administrator; Terry Hess, Planning and Zoning Director; Donna Scanlon, Assistant Planner; Laura Griggs- McElhaney, Assistant Planner; and Dolores Messer, Secretary. PRESS ATTENDANCE: Susan Burgess, Ft. Pierce News Tribune. TAPES: 1, 2, and 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Petition of H. Wayne Huizenga to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Low Density Residential DeveloPment) and CG (General Commercial Development) for property located on the east side of Gilson Road at its intersection with Becker Road. '~'ne=~ property lies along the west shoreline of the North Fork of ~h~:~ St. Lucie River. c~ Mr. Jack Carmody, Esquire, presented the petition He said th~ although Staff had favorably reviewed the petition concerns bl~ _~ adjacent property owners relative to the petition's commercial ~ request had been brought to his attention. Due to these legit~ mate concerns of neighboring properties, Mr. Carmody requested ~ withdraw the CG land use request. Mr. Murphy said this with- drawal involves Parcels 1, 2, and 3. In response to questioning by Mr. Murphy, Mr. Carmody replied that the SU (Semi Urban) land use classification would remain in the two parcels located west of Gilson Road. He said the remaining property is intended for a private marina. Mr. Murphy said that RL is a sufficient land use category for a marina for the private use of the residents of the project. Mr. Carmody then explained that the subject property is located near Harbour Ridge and Wide Waters subdivision. Wide Waters is located northerly of the subject parcel, and Harbor Ridge is located to the northwest. General Development Corporation owns the property located to the west of Gilson Road. He further stated that the petitioner wishes to come back at a later date with a PUD application, and intends to apply for density of 1 to 2 units per acre. The petitioner is presently~negotiating for an additional parcel of land (approximately 100 acres) located in Martin County, 20 acres of which is located in St. Lucie County. PUD's will be applied for in both counties. Plans will include a golf community szmilar to Harbour Ridge. Re~arding public services in the area, negotiations are being made for additional services, specifically fire, ambulance ser- vices, and sewage. These issues may be addressed at the .time the PUD application is made. Martin Downs Utilities has made appli- cation to Martin County for an extension into the subject area. Martin County has some concern regarding the road system because the access to the development will be primarily~through Martin County over the Palm City Bridge. Mr. Lester Boese, Vice President of Harbor Ridge, Ltd., said that his organization would like to see the development be handled as a PUD in the future, as it would conform with surrounding zoning designations. Mr. Albert Falk, assistant to the President of the Wide Waters Property Owners Association, said there is concern of future density being designated for up to 5 units per acre. Mr. Virgil Smith, President of Greenbriar Village Homeowners Association at Harbor Ridge, said they would oppose a PUD appli- cation if it would significantly increase the population density of the area. Mr. William Atterberry, a resident of Gilson Road, reiterated comments made by Messrs. BOese, Falk and Smith. Regarding Staff comments, Mr. Murphy said Staff has no objection to the request for land use designation change from SU to RL. The granting of this request would offer the petitioner the opportunity to reappear before this Board with specific develop- ment plans. Comments from the Dept. of Community Affairs, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Dept. of Natural Resources, and SFWMD indicate general concurrence with Staff's recommendation of approval. The project development impacts would be addressed by both Martin County officials and City of Port St. Lucie officials due to its unique geographical location. SFWMD and DNR have expressed concerns regarding potential en- vironmental impacts at this site. There are extensive wetland communities throughout this area, both internal and adjacent to -14- the St. Lucie River. These issues would be addressed at of f'inal development plan reviews. the time'~~ ~ Hearin~ no further public comment in favor of or in opposition t~ the petition, Chairman Terpening closed the public portion of the~ hearing. ~~ Considering the petitioner's presentation and Staff comments, Mr. Carman made a mo~ion that Ordinance No. 87-95, adjusting Parcels 1, 2, and 3 for withdrawal from the CG land use designation request, be forwarded .to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Mrs. King secondedi the motion, and upon roll call, the Board voted unanimously in favor of the mo~ion. Chairman ~erpening informed the petitioner that the petition will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recom- mendation of approval, including the above-mentioned adjustment. The hearing adjourned at 11:25 P.M. -15- TUESDAY AGENDA - LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY NOVEMBER 10 1987 7:00 P.M. Petition of H. Wayne Huizenga, by Agent: Jack Carmody, to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Low Density Resi- dential Development) and CG (General Commercial Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: At the southeastern corner of St. Lucie County on the St. Lucie River, east of the end of Becker Road and south of Perimeter Road.) Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such pur- pose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners October 20, 1987. Legal notice was pub- lished in the News Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on October 21, 1987. FILE NO. PA-87-014 Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence S 88°35'30'' W along the South line of said Section 36, a distance of 1763.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described centerline; thence N 17°30'20'' W a distance of 890.24 feet to the beginning of a curve, concave Westerly, having a radius of 1000.00 feet and a central angle of 7°35'57"; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, a distance of 132.63 feet to the end of said curve; thence N 25°06'17'' W, a distance of 1254.85 feet to the intersection with the West line of said Government Lot 3. Also less that right-of-way for Becket Road as recorded in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of st. Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: - The North 50 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying West of the Gilson Road, and the South 50 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying west of the Gilson Road, of Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East. Containing 177.42 acres more or less. AND ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM: PARCEL 1: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'16'' E, along the East line of said Section 36, a distance of 1248.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel: Thence N 69°31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet; thence N 29°45"35'' W a distance of 481.50 feet; thence N 31°07'21'' E a distance of 185.73 feet, thence N 67°13'55'' E a distance of 294 feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River; thence meander Southerly along the natural Mean High Water line a distance of 688 feet more or less to the intersection with the said East line of Section 36; thence S 00°49'16'' W, along said Section line a distance of 471 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10.5 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. LUcie County, Florida lying North of Becker Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Containing 2.51 acres more or less. PARCEL 3: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of Becket Road right- of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St Lucie County, Florida. ' LESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containing 7.70 acres more or less. 2 of 2 PARCEL 1: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'16'' E, along the East line of said Section 36, a distance of 1248.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel: Thence N 69°31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet; thence N 29°45'35'' W a distance of 481.50 feet; thence N 31°07'21'' E a distance of 185.73 feet; thence N 67"13'55'' E a distance of 294 feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River: thence meander Southerly along the natural Mean High Water line a distance of 688 feet more or less to the intersection with the said East-line of Section 36; thence S 00°49'16'' W, along said Section line..a distance of 471 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10.5 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida lying North of Becket Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way,as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County~ Florida. Containing 2.51 Acres more or less. PARCEL 3: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of Becker Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public R~cords of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of_way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida LESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containing 7.70 acres more or less. PARCELS 1, 2 and 3 containing 20.71 acres more or less. Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00~49'00'' E along the East line of said Section 36, a distance of 641.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S89°15'25" W a distance of 1320.66 feet to the West line of Government Lot 4 of said Section 36; thence N 00°47'39'' E along the West line of Government Lot 4 a distance of 1956.57 feet to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4; thence N 89°05'04'' E along the North line of Government Lot 4, a distance of 680 feet, more or less, to the waters of the St. Lucie River; thence meander said waters Southeasterly along the natural Mean High Water line' of the said St. Lucie River a distance of 1080 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with the aforesaid East line of Section 36, thence S 00°49'00'' W along said East line, a distance of 1200.07 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH the following described parcel: Being all of Government Lot 2 and all of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Less that portion of the 80 feet wide right-of-way of Gilson Road, as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, lying in said Government Lot 3, the center line of which being more particularly described as follows: ST. LUCIE COUNTY F~ee: $400 Date: April PETITION FOR C~ANGE.INFUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION Applicant's Name: H. Wayne Huizenga Applicant's AddresS: 901 E. Los Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdate, FL 33301 ~pplicant'S .Phone. Number: ~ (305) 524-8400 3 0 1987 I, H. Wayne Huizenga, by and through my undersigned attorney, do hereby petition the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission and the St, Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to change the Future Land Use Classification of the following described property: (See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part.hereof,) Parcel 1 - 4436-410-0001.000/7 Property Tax I.D. Parcel 2 , 4436-131-0001.000/1 From: Semi Urban (SU) To: Parcel 3- 443'6-131-0001.000/1 General Commercial (CG) .~ (See also Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof.) and to change the Future Land Use Classification of the following described propertY: (See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof.) Property Tax I.D. ~: 4436-131-0.001.000/1 4436~410-0001.0'00/'? .... From: Semi Urban (SU) To: Low Density Residential (RL) (See also COnceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof.) My reason for making this request is: It is the intent of the appliCant to file a P.U.D. application for a mixed use, residential and commercial, development on the properties subject to this request. X , N/A I do hereby certify .that I own in fee simple all of the above described property and have legal right to request a change in. Future Land Use of said property. 'I (We) do hereby certify that I (we) own in fee simple that portion of the above described property for'Which a change in Future Land Use is requested, described as , N~A The remainder of the property descr'ibed in paragraPh ~1 above for which change in Future Land Use is requested is owned by and that I (we) certify that the above legal description submitted by me.(us) represents the propertY I (we). wish to have reclassified. I understand that I must be present at the hearing o~ wi,il be represented by my attorney, BY: Central Parkway, Stuart, FL 33.497 (3'05) 288-1980 PA e 400 Attorney for Petitioner NOTICE: INCOMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 163.3187 FLORIDA STATUTES THIS PETITIONCAN ONLY BE PRESENTED FOR FINAL COMMISSION REVIEW DURING MAX AND NOVEMBER OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE CONSULT WITH THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY ZONING DIVISION~ DETERMINE APPROPRIATEDEADLINES FOR R~VIEW. EXHIBIT "A" to '-H. ~a3Yh~ ~ui zen ga' s Petition for Change in Future Land Use Classification Property Requesting Change in Future Land Use Classification from Semi Urban (SU) to General COmmercial (CG) PARCEL 1: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36. Township 37 Sour'h, Range. 40 East. St. Lucie County;~ Florida and being.more particularly-described as follows: ~ommence at the. Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00^49'16" E, along the East line of said Secton 36, a distance of 1248.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel; -Thence. N 69^31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet;, thence ~- -~ ~ , a distance, of 481.50 feet'; thence N 31^07'21" E a distance of 185.73 feet; thence N 67 13 55 E a distance of 29& feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St.. Lucie River: along the natural Mean Hig~h Water line a distance ~= ..... u~ ~o~ feet mope o~- less to the intersection with the said East line of Section 36; 'thence S 00~49'I6'' W, a!on~ said section line a-distance of 471 feet more or less to the POii~i OF BEGiiiNiNG. ContaininE 10.5 acres more o~ less.. PARCEL2: Bein~ all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida lying North of Becket Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Pa~e 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road ri~ht-ofJway .as relocated and recorded in O. R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Containin~ 2,5i Acres more or less. ,pARCEL 3: Being all that partof Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range ~0 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of Becket Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 1~8. Paue'247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida: and West of Gi!son Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Pa~e 4-50, Public Records of St. -Lucie County, Florida. LESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containing 7.70 acres more or'less. Parcels 1, 2 and 3 containing 20.71 acres more or less. EXHIBIT "B" ...... Petition for Change in Future Land Use Classification Property ReqUesting Change in Future Land Use Classification from ~Semi Urban (SU) to Low Density Residential (RL) Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot &, Section 36, Township. 37 South, Range 40 East~' St. Lucie County~ Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36: thence N 00^49'00" E along the East line of said Section 36. a distance of 641.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence S.89^15' 25" W a distance of 1320.66 feet to the West line of Government Lot 4 of said Section 36: thence N 00^47'39'' E along the West line of Government Lot 4 a distance of 1956.57 feet to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot &; thence N 89^05'04'. E along the NOrth line of Government Lot 4, a distance, of 680 feet, more or less, to the waters of the St. Lucie River: thence meander said waters Southeasterly along the natural Mean High Water 'tine of %he said St. Lucie River a distance of 1080 feet, more ore'less to the point-= ~ ....... :-- , ~ ~n==~=~=~=,~ with the aforesaid East line of Section 36, thence ~ .... ~ O0 49 O0 W along said East line, a distance of 1200..07 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHERWITH the following described parcel: Being all of Government Lot 2 and 'all of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. ' Less that portion of 'the SO feet ~T'd~:~fkht_of_way of Gilson Road, as relocated and recorded in O. R. Book 463, PaEe 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, lyin~ in said Government Lot 3, the center line of which being more particularly described as follows: Deed Florida, described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence S 88^35'30'` W alon~ the South line of said Section 36, a distance of i763.&6 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described centerline; thence N 17^30'20.' W, a distance of 890.24 'feet to the beginning'of' a curve, concave Westerly, ha~in~ a radius of. 1000.00 feet a~d a central anule of 7^35'57-;. thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, a distance of 132.63 feet to the end of said curve; thence N 25~06'17" W, a distance of 1254.85 feet tc the intersection with the West li~e of said Government Lot 3. Also less .~hat right-of-way"for Beck'er Road as recorded in Book 148, Page 2~7, Public Records of St. Lucie County, The North 50 fee~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast I/4 lying West of the Gilson Road, and the South 50 feet of the Northwest ~/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying west of the Gilson Road, of Section 36 Township 37 South Range 40 East. ' , Containing 177.42 acres mor.e or less. AND ALSO LESS EXHIBIT "B" CONTINUED THEREFROM: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot &, Section 36. Township 37 South, Range 40 East. St. Lucie County- Florida and bein~ more particularly described as follows:' ~ommence at the Southeast corner Of said Section 36; thence N 00^4g'16'' E, along the East line of said Secton 36. a distance of 1248..84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel: Thence-N 69^31,36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet;~- thence N 29^45'3S'' W a distance of 481.50 feet; thence N 1 07 21 E a distance of i85.73 feet; thence Iq 67^13'55'' E a distance of 294 feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River: thence meander Southerly along the natural ~,= = dzstance ofooo .... feet more or less to the intersection ~ with the said East line of Section ~6.; thence S 00^49't6'' W, along said section line a distance of 471 feet more or-less to the POi1~T OF BEGinNinG. Containing 10.5 acres more or less. ' PARCEL 2: _ .- · Being ali that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida North of Becker Road riuht-of-Way as described in Deed Book Paue 247, Public Records-of St. Lucie-~-o~nty, Florida; and ~est of Gilson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O. R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Flerida. Containing 2.51 Acres more or less. .PARCEL 3: Bein~ all that part of G~vernment Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. l¥in~ South of Becket Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book ~48. Pa~e 247, Public Records of St. LuCie County, Florida- and West of Oi!son Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O~R. Book 463~ Pa~e~50, Public Records of St -Lucie County, Florida.. ~ESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containin~ ?.70 ac~es more or 'less. 2 of 2 GCY, I c. L~ad ~ . Stua~'t 28gJ Ft. Pierce 466-9500 P.O~ Box !018 ~'~21 NtT 0 G C Y, ln.c. La nd Surveyors Stuart Ft. Pierce ,466 ~9500 P.O~ Bo~t 1018 St~uart. Fla. $$495 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION(ERS October 20, 1987 D V LOPM6 NT DIRECTOR J. GARY AMENT In compliance with the provisions of the Florida Statutes, you are hereby advised that H. Wayne Huizenga, by Agent: Jack Carmody, has petitioned the Local Planning Agency to amend the Future Land Use ~Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Low Density Residential Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: At the southeastern corner of St. Lucie County on the St. LUcie River, east of the end of Becker Road and south of Perimeter Road.) A public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, November 10, 1987, in Room 101, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro. ceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. If you have any questions, additional information may be obtained by calling Area Code 305, 466-1100, Extension 359. Sincerely, LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA J. P. Terpening, Chairman FILE NO. PA-87-014 HAVERT L. FENN District No. I · JUDY CULPEPPER, District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5 County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce. FL 33482-5652 ® Phone(305) 466-1100 Director: Ext. 398 ® Building: Ext. 344 ® Planning: Ext. 3t6 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: EXt. 317 PARCEL 1: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'16'' E, along the East line of said Section 36, a distance of 1248.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the fo{lowing described parcel: Thence N 69°31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet; thence N 29°45'35" W a distance of 481.50 feet; thence N 31°07'21'' E a distance of 185.73 feet; thence N 67°13'55'' E a distance of 294 feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River: thence meander Southerly along the natural Mean High Water line a distance of 688 feet more or less to the intersection with the said East-line of Section 36; thence S 00°49'16'' W, along said Section line.-a-distance of 4.71 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10.5 acres more or lesso PARCEL 2: Being all.that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South,.Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida lying North of Becket Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County,.Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way,as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County; Florida. Containing 2.51 Acres more or less. PARCEL 3: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of Becket Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public K~cords of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right~of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida LESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containing 7.70 acres more or less. PARCELS 1, 2 and 3 containing 20.71 acres more or less. Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'00'' E along the East line of said Section 36, a distance of 641.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 89°15'25'' W ~ distance of 1320.66 feet to the West line of Government Lot 4 of said Section 36; thence N 00~47'39'' E along the West line of Government Lot 4 a distance of 1956.57 feet to the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 4; thence N 89°05'04'' E along the North line of Government Lot 4, a distance of 680 feet, more or less, to the waters of the St. Lucie River; thence meander said waters Southeasterly along the natural Mean High Water line of the said St. Lucie River a distance of 1080 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with the aforesaid East line of Section 36, thence S 00°49'00'' W along said East line, a distance of 1200.07 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH the following described Parcel: Being all of Government Lot 2 and all of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Less that portion of the 80 feet wide right-of-way of Gilson Road, as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, lying in said Government Lot 3, the center line of which being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence S 88°35'30'' W along the South line of said Section 36, a distance of 1763.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described centerline; thence N 17°30'20'' W a distance of 890.24 feet to the beginning of a curve, concave Westerly, having a radius of 1000.00 feet and a central angle of 7°35'57"; thence Northerly along the arc of said ~urve, a distance of 132.63 feet to the end of said curve; thence N 25~06~17'' W, a distance of 1254.85 feet to the intersection with the West line of said Government Lot 3. Also less that right-of-way for Becker Road as recorded in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of st. Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: ' The North 50 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying West of the Gilson Road, and the South 50 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying west of the Gilson Road, of Section 36 Township 37 South, Range 40 East. ' Containing 177.42 acres more or less. AND ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM: PARCEL 1: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00°49'16'' E, along the East line of said Section 36, a distance of 1248.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel: Thence N 69°31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet; thence N 29°45':35" W a distance of 481.50 feet; thence N 31°07'21'' E a distance of 185.73 feet, thence N 67o13'55'' E a distance of 294 feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River; thence meander Southerly along the natural Mean High Water line a distance of 688 feet more or less to the intersection with the said East line of Section 36; thence S 00°49'16'' W, along said Section line a distance of 471 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10.5 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida lying North of Becker Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie county, Florida. Containing 2.51 acres more or less. PARCEL 3: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of Becket Road right- of-way as described in Deed Book 148, Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book 463, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. LESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containing 7.70 acres more or less. 2of 2 THE NEWS TRIBUNE re the undersigned authority personally appearei J. McMillen or KaChleen K. LeClair, who on oat[ nac he/she is Publisher, Publisher's Secretary of ~ws Tribune, a daily newspaper published at Fort in St. Lucia County, Florida; that the attached advertisement, being a. ~ ]:,.[.¢.e .................... naccer of ~qBgg...~.n ~..~p~ ............ bHshed in said newspaper in the issues of .......... 11/4/87 ....... I .... · NOTICEr OF CHANGE IN LAND USE The.~*-~ucie County Board of County Commissioners proposes to r'~ 'la the uae of land with;n the map in dvertisement. A pUL.~ ...,earing on the proposal will be held before the St. Lucia Coun,,g Loea Planning Agency on Tu, 10, 1987, atT:00 P ivI in Room 101 St, LucieCountYAdmiaistretion Building 2300¥irg nia Avenu~ Ft Pi Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency am electronically recorded. If a pars peal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to ;any matter considered at such mee~ will need a record of the proceedings, and that for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim ceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to based. Copies of the proposed amendments to the St. Lucia County Growth Management Policy Plan are a~ review in theist. Lucia County Office of C~mmunity Development - Buildirig and Zoning Division, Room Avenue, Ft. Pierce, F orida, during normal business hours. All interested persons may appear and will be given an opportunity to be !)eard at that time. If it becomesnecessery;.these pub|lc h~e~arings ma~, be continued from ti~i~o time. ......... · ~ ~ ~,..,~ ~ ~,~, ST. LUCIE COL - "~ "~ ~'~'-: '~ LOCAL PLANN /S/James P. T CHAIR MAN O it-. Couh PEARL GOODMAN, LESTER D. ROTH AND BETTY ROTH: From RL (Low Density Residential to CG (Commercial General): Located I~tween Old Dixie Highway and North U Count~ Line. THELMA GROVES, INC.: "~ . From RL (Low Density Residential) to CG (Commercial General): Located between OKJ Dixie Highway and North U.S. I, approximately RKRNDRIO HOLDINGS: ' . - . ' INDINO ESTATES UMITED PARTNERSHIP:. ~nC~mNoSr tub(,S.?m) U...r.ba, n ) t° ~ M (Mediu m eensi .W R~siden rial) and R.L. ( LOW Oe*'lSit~/S ~1): CO~d "the so~-'~hea~t .....fthai ~rom BU (Semi Urban) to Il. (Industrial Light): L~a~l along th-~v~ te~rng~ou~hof Omn.c FT. PIEK'C[ INVESTORS, LTD.: ~ - From aU (Semi Urben) ~o CT (Commerce( T~: LcJca~d on ~ we~ .,S~8 of Gordy Road. apprOximate;y A mile sout~ of Okeechobee ARC#IE A. HENDRY, ~ H, WAYNE HUIZENGA: NOTICE OF CHA '~E IN LAND USE The St. Lucia County Board of County Commissioners pl~_. ~es to change the use of land within the areashown in the map in this advertisement. A public hearing on the proposal will be held before the St. Lucia County Local Planning Agency, onTuesday, November 10. 1987, at 7:00 P.M., in Room 101, St. Lucia County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft,Pierce. Florida. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to ap- aeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meet(rigor hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that for such purpose, he may need to ensure ttmt a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to based, Copies of the proposed amendments to the St. Lucia County Growth Management Policy Plan are available for public review in the St. Lucia County Office of Community Development - Building and Zoning Division, Room 201, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. P erce Florida, dudng normal business hours. ~ All interested persons may appear and will be given an opportunity fo be heard at that time. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. ST. LUClE COUNTY, FLORIDA LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY /S/James P. Terpening CHAIRMAN .E COUNTY FLORIDA LESTEE D ROTHAMDBETI'Y ROTH: ' · ¼ milesouthoftndian River pEAliI. GOODMAN, ' ~ ......... *~camd between 0 d Dixie Highway and North U.S. 1. aPP~°x~mate~ THELMA GROVES INC.: RK4NDRIO flOLDIN ~GS.', ....... ~-mrnercial General}' Located ar the northwest corr~r of Indrio Road and Emerson Avenue. iN DRIO ESTATES UMII'ED PAETNER~HIP: . Resldenfiai): Located at the southeaat corn~ of the inte~ece°n °f Indd° R°~d SELBY a. BURCH, JOSEPH S. BUSCH & LENA C. BURCN: FT. PIERCE INVESTORS. LTD.: From SU (Semi Urban) to CT {Commercial Tourist): Located On rite west sb:te of Gordy Road, ~0~¢imate~f ¼ mae sou~ of Ok~R~, ARCHI[From RH (HighA' NENDRY,Density R e~identialil]h to CG (Commercial General): Located along [~he we~ ~tde of South U.S. t, M La auona v[~a Drive. H WAYNE HUIZENOA: ' ' From SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Low Density Residential) aha CG (Commercial General): Located at the intemectt~n of Gi~:~ end aec~er R~. alollg lhe w~t COUNTY Fee: *400 Date: April 30, 198 PETITION FOR CHANGE IN FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION _ o ~_~z~,-~__/°~.~ ~, ~..~ ~ Applicant's Name: ~ H. Wayne Huizenga ~5/F7 Applicant's Address: 901 E. Los Olas Boulevar'd Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Applicant's Phone Number: (305) 524-8400 " I, H. Wayne Huizenga, by and through my undersigned attorney, do hereby petition the St. Luci~County Planning and Zoning Commission and the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to change the Future Land Use Classification of the following described property: (See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereofo) Property Tax I.D. Parcel 1- 4436-410-0001.000/7 Parcel 2 - 4436-131-0001.000/1 Parcel 3 - 4436-131-0001.000/1 From: Semi Urban~ To: General Commercial (~ (See also Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof.) <~.a._n~!to change the Future Land Use Classification of the following described property: (See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof.) Property Tax I.D. 9:4436-131-0001.000/1 4436-410-0001.000/7 From: Semi Urban ~ To: Low Density Residential ~ (See also Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof.) My reason for making this request is: It is the intent of the applicant to file a P.UoD. application for a mixed use, residential and commercial, development on the properties subject to this request. X N/A I do hereby certify that I own in fee simple all of the above described property and have legal right to request a change in Future Land Use of said property. I (We) do hereby certify that I (we) own in fee simple that portion of the above described property for which a change in Future Land Use is requested, described as N/A The remainder of the property described in paragraph #1 above for which change in Future Land Use is requested is owned by and that I (we) certify that the above legal description submitted by me (us) represents the property I (we) wish to have reclassified. I understand that I must be present at the hearing or will be represented by my attorney. ~J~hn T. Carmody, Jr. k~'~' ~'~0 Central Parkway, ~ 400 Stuart, FL 33497 (305) 288-1980 PA Attorney for Petitioner NOTICE: IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 163.3187 FLORIDA STATUTES THIS PETITION CAN ONLY BE PRESENTED FOR FINAL COMMISSION REVIEW DURING MAY AND NOVEMBER OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE CONSULT WIT~ THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY ZONING DIVISION TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE DEADLINES FOR REVIEW. EXHIBIT "A" to H..Wayne"~uizenga's Petition for Change in Future Land Use Classification Property Requesting Change in Future Land Use Classification from Semi Urban (SU) to General Commercial (CG) PARCEL 1: Being a parcel of land lying in Government Lot 4, Section 36. Township 37 South, Range 40 East. St. Lucie County~ Florida and being more particularly described as follows: ~ommence at the Southeast corner of said Section 36; thence N 00^49'16'. E, along the East line of said Secton 36. a distance of 1248.8& feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the following described parcel: Thence' N 69^31'36'' W a distance of 646.73 feet; thence N 29^45'35'. W a distance of 481.50 feet; thence N 31^07'21'' E a distance of 185.73 feet; thence N 67^13'55" E a distance of 29& feet more or less to the Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River: thence meander Southerly along the natural ~ean High Water line a distance of 688 feet mor-e o~~ less the intersection with the said East line of Section 36; lhence S 00^&9'16'' W, along said Section line a distance of 47i feet more or less to the POii{Y OF Containing 10.5 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida lying North of Becket Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book l&8. Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and West of Gilson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O. R. Book 463, Page ~50, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Containing 2.51 Acres more or less. PARCEL 3: Being all that part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of Becket Road right-of-way as described in Deed Book 148. Page 247, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida: and West of Gilson Road right-of-way as relocated and recorded in O.R. Book ~63, Page 450, Public Records of St. Lucie County. Florida. LESS the South 610.00 feet thereof. Containing 7.70 acres more or less. Parcels 1, 2 and 3 containing 20.71 acres more or less.