The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBishop, ConnieDate: Ap Tape: 1- Commissio Denny Gte Others Managemen Lancaster Developme Joseph Director; ~Di rector Purchas ~ n Solid Was Utilities Clerk REGULAR (This i It was I this it unani.mo The Pla stated Mr. Mi c re~ e this iT Mr. Hcu~ h-ad tn BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUC!E COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING ril 5, 1994 4 convened: 7:10 p.m. adjourned: 12:50 a.m. nets Present: Chairman, Havert L. Fenn, Jud~ Culpepper, en, R. Dale Trefelner, Cliff Barnes '- -!. -6~ ~esent: Tom Kindred, County Administrator; Dan Kurek, t/Budget Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney; Jim , . Asst. County Attorney; Terry Virta, Community nt Administrator; Dennis Murphy, Land Development Manager; alfait, Acquisition Director; Curtis King, Airport Ronald Brown, Public Works Administrator; Jack-Southard, Public Safety; Morris Adger, Port Director; Donna Beach, g Director; Bill Miller, Planning Director; Leo Cordeiro, te Director; Don McLam, Recreation Director; Sam Amerson, W. Linsen, Sheriff's office; A. Millie White, Deputy AGENDA BLI C HEARINGS DEVELOPMENT 94-017/Petition of Houston CUozzo Group, Inc. a resolution granting Preliminary-and Final .Development approval and change in zoning from Co to PNRD. rem was tabled on March 22, 1994) loved by Com. Culpepper, seconded by Com. Trefelne. c, to lift em from the table; and, upon roll call, moti( n carried asly. nning Director addressed the Board on this p~oject and zhe conditions included in the reso!utlon. laet Houston from the firm Houston, Cuozzo Group, Inc. and ~ting the petitioner, Connie Bishop, addressed th. BDard on ~Eon advised the Board of the difficult time Ms. ~isho~ has {eeeing this proper~y rented. Ms. Con: general Mr. Mar Ferrari, comparis Com. and cros Mr. Don of this Mr. Port Park Hon ie Bishop, the petitioner, addressed the Board on the theme of the building. y Sanders, Engineer from the firm Lindhal, Browning, and Heltstrom, addressed the Board regarding the traffic on. _ nes addressed the children being attracted to-~his store sing the busy highway. Porter, River Park resident, project. addressed the Board in favor er advised the Board that many of the members of the River ~eowners association are in opposition to this project due .-to the t;raffic and. the danger to the ckildren. Also, River Park was to be residential and they do not want commercial estab!i~hments in River Park. Com. Cu~pepper spoke on the condition of the property. Mrs. Le~ Primerano, River Park resident, representing the Home Owners, addreSsed the Board in opposition to this zoning change. Mrs. Ce p~ti ti o: zoning Mrs. Kix afraid congreg~ will at1 Ms. Pam~ Board ti concern Mr. Wail the sto: The Pla] per 100{ Mr. JO chitdre] the way Mr. Dav~ be main[ Mr. Tko traffic establl :ilia Kirby, 174 W. Prima Vista Blvd., PSL submitted a with 132 signatures stating their opposition to this lhange. 'by stated the reason for the petition was the resident~ are ;he store would bring crime into the area, children will ~te and the dumpsters will not be'kept under control and ~ract zodents. la Shatola,-area r~sident and school teacher advised the ~at she concurred with Mrs. Kirby's comments and expressed with the children in the area. CoOney, area resident asked how many parking sPaceg'wilr e require. ming Director advised Mr. Cooney the code states 5 spaces ft. a requirement of 24 spaces and 1 handicapped. n Salerno, area resident advised the Board that many ~ ride their bicycles in the area.and do not observe traffic they should. - s, long time area resident, stated the area doesn't need to ~y commercial. ~as Castle, area resident, suggested more studies of 5he pattern be made of the area before anymore commercLal hments are placed. / / Mr. Ed applicat Mr. Hous and sug~ adjusted Com. Gte that he area wit ~uer, area property owner, asked the Board to consider his £oD when he comes before them in the near future. 2on made his closing comments and addressed signalization 'ested maybe the speed limits in this area need to be en Stated he could not support this change for-the reason ~as seen the area develop into a sports and recreation type various institutional buildings. He doesn't feel we have an ob!i that we Also he because maintai~ and fask a commer om. Cut he way / g~tion just because a road changes and a road gains traffic ~eed to go in and change the nature of whole neighborhoods. [oesn' t think we have an obligation to change~oning simply it is not economically feasible, we have an obligation to the integrity of some of the nezghborhoods in the style ion which they have been sfnce inception and would prefer ~ial office. pepper stated that probably if the property did not look it presently does, and if it hadn't been the way it's been ' for as tong as she could remember, she would Probably ooncur with some of zhe remarks. If the County has a signalization problem on ~ that's dangerous for children, we need to something about blem regardless of ~hat sits on that corner and she hopes that that pro the rema into by Chairman whether corridor It was approve the new from 6:( follows: motion rks about the problem with signalization would be looked the Public Works department. Fenn stated that Prima Vista will continue to change- ~his Board is present or not. It is a major east and. west moved by Com. Culpepper, seconded by Com. Trefelner, to the change.in zoning with all stipulations as noted plus one aboutthe loading zone and the hours of operation being 0 a.m. to 10:00 p. ~; and, upon roll call, the vote was as Nay's: Barnes, Green; Aye's: CulpepPer, Trefelner, Fenn; arried by a vote of 3 to 2. COMMIT, ION£RS RETURN October Ms. Conr 7648 Wy] Port St Subject Dear Ms On Augu: schedule Vista Bi was indJ receive from removal In cas~ attachi~ hearing ECEIPT 3, 1994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TERRY L. VIRTA, AICP Lie E. Bishop .dwood Way Lucie, Florida 34986 'Southeast Corner of Prima Vista Blvd. & Airoso Boulevard Bishop: u 25, 1994, this office sent you a letter requesting a time ~ as to when the structures at the southeast corner of Prima .vd. & Airoso Boulevard could be expected to be removed, as .cated during your recent rezoning hearings. We continue to public inquires about this item and since we have not heard [, I must again ask what your expected time table is for the of the structures. you did not get our letter of August 25, 1994, I zuu %g a copy of it for your records. We look forward to from you and if you have any questions, please let us know. De've~op~ent Director TLV/DJM/cb KONTRYI(ww attachment~ Cou Cou Plm Cod CoN HAVERT L. FENN, District No. 1 (407) ~ty Administrator nty Attorney nning Manager Compliance Manager aissioner Green JUDY CULPEPPER, District No. 2 o DENNY GREEN. District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 o CLIFF BARNES, District No. 5 2300 Virginia Avenue o Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 68-1590 - Growth Management: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407)468-1576 Codes Compliance: (407) 468-1571 BOARD 0 COMMIS August.~ Ms. Conr 7648 Wy] Port St. Subject: Dear Ms. ~you several the pro! Bouleval staff ac been cut vidlati¢ 'carport However PNRD, r removed. removal questiox expect Board oJ If ther~ would a~ not beir F COUNTY SION _RS 5, 1994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TERRY L. VtRTA. AICP .ie E. Bishop .dwood Way Lucie, Florida 34986 Southeast Corner of Prima Vista Blvd. &Airoso Boulevard Bishop: .re aware, over the past few weeks the County has r~ceived inquiries regarding the development status and condition of ~erties at the southeast Corner of Prima Vista and Airoso ~s~ Recent field visits to this site byCode Enforcement ~knowledged the fact that the grass around these homes has 3 and. that as of this date there are no noticeable code .nS~..with the~ekception or-'one (5) unsecured door into the Utility.room on:the corner property. . , at the time these properties were rezgned from RS-4 to ~resentations were made. that these homes would soon be Our office has been asked what the time table is for the of these structures and since we cannot answer this we thought it best to ask you. When can we, the County ;he removal of these structures as was represented to the County Commissioners on April 5, 19947 are no plans to remove them in the immediate future, I ,preciate a brief explanation of why this re. presentation is .g carried out. you hav~ any questions, / Deve~p~ent Director TLV/DJM/cb KONTRYi[uu) Cou~ Court Plan Code I-tAV[RiF L. FENN. D~stnc~ NO 1 attachments) ty AdminisnraLor t¥ Attorney ming ManagSr Compliance Manager We look forward to hearing from you and if please let us know. , JUDY CULPEP0£R. Disrric~ No 2 - DENNY ~RE£N. Diwdcr No..3 - R D;_£ -:£:~J-E,R_ D~rio t~o 4 - CUFF BARN£S. Diwnc, No 5 ~$00 Virginia Avenue - Fort Pierce. FL $4952-5052 (407) 4,58~1590 - Growth Management: (407) 468-155~R - Pl~_nmng: (407) 468-1576 Codes Compliance: (407) 468-157 ! BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 3-A - PUBLIC HEARING PETITION OF CONNIE BISHOP- RES NO. 94-017 MINUTES OF APRIL 5, 1994 Chairman Fenn stated that this petition is for granting the approval of Resolution No. 04-017 granting Preliminary and Final Planned (Commerc with the Southeas Port St. Chairman -from the Commissi .table, al motion. Bill Mi petition of the-p~ )evelopment' approval and a change in zoning from C0 ~al Office). to PNRD (Planned Non Residential Development) recommended conditions. This petition is located_at the t corner of Prima-Vista Boulevard and Airoso Boulevard in Lucie. Fenn then asked for a recommendation to lift this item t~ble of the 'March 22, 1994 meeting. )net ~ulpepper made' a motion to lilt'this item-from-'the-'. ad Upon roll call,-th~ Board-voted..unap{mousty-in~.fayor of [ler, Planning Director addressed the Board on this ~ He then stated.the conditions included in the appr~vat- otition as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission: Ail lighting facilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind .to adjoining streets or properties; and Signs permitted for the preliminary and final PUD 'shall be 1 { m{ ted to the -following: Freestanding Project ~igns - Primary- Street Frontage - 1 sign, maximum 32 sq. ft., maximum 10 feet high. Other Major Sign Frontage (Airoso Boulevard) - 1 sign maximum 16 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. Facade Signs - A maximum of 150 sq. ft. of facade signs shall be permitted. The permitted sign area may be divided to provide the facade signs facing Prima Vista Blvd. Receipt for __.~ Certified Mail N° insurance Coverage ProVided Do n°t use for international Mail ~See Mr~ Mill signs. Mr. Mil2 with th~ Commissi Planning loading or not t as requi to move Commissi particul Commissl, overhead Mr. Mill applican- Commissi, Communit~ Mr. Mill Corridor Allowance for Double Faced and Lighted Signs - Ail signs may be double faced and directly or indirectly lighted. Setbacks for Signs - All signs shall be located a minimum of ten feet from any right-of-way and five feet from any adjoining property line. ~r further explained the reasons for the conditions for the e Only'those retail trade uses which are identified as permitted in Section 3.00.01- (Q)(2)(f), CN (Commercial Neighborhood, St. Lucie COunty Land Development Code) shall be authorized within the area described in part C except that gasoline services shall not be permitted. ~r stated that staff recommended approval of this petition conditions as stated. oner Culpepper stated that there was some debate at the and Zoning meeting that there was discussion on where the · nd Unloading may take place. She asked Mr Miller whether hat issue had been resolved.. ~r stated that the loading area be attached tothe building red by the Code. He stated that the applicant had agreed the loading area next to the building. - ~ner Culpepper asked Mr. Miller whether or not that ~r problem had been corrected? ~r stated yes. )her Barnes asked for clarification of the red area in the transparencies. mr explained that there are two homes unoccupied on the 's property and the rest of t~e parcel is vacant. her Green asked whether or not there were plans from Development for the use of the intersections. ~r stated that staff had been looking at the Prima Vista for several months. He stated that the entire corridor may eventually be Commercial. Another neighborhood meeting has been sch(~duled with the public. Mr. Mich and the Board. Ms,; Conr explain Mr. Mart Ferrari concern Commissi casual tl Mr. Barn~ business Ms. Bish4 Mr. Barn, children that he because Mr. Hous older an~ signaliz~ that the Ms. Bish¢ get to t! Mr. Don AssociatJ petition. Commissic children. years, ar that it the neigl neighbor[ there bec that the missing ~ looked aw ~el Houston from the firm of Houston, Cuozzo Group, Inc., agent for the petitioner presented the petition to the ie Bishop, the petitioner appeared before the Board to the design and operation of the proposed business. { Sanders from the engineering firm of Lindahl, Browning, and Hellstrom appeared before the Board to discuss the Df traffic problems. ~ner Trefelner stated that it was important to clarify the ~ips as opposed to the commercial trips. ~s asked what the business hours would be for the proposed stated she would be open until 10 P.M. ~s stated that this would be a dangerous intersection for to cross coming from the parks to the store. He stated ~hought there would be injuries to children in the future ~f crossing the intersection to the store. ~on stated that the majority of the children should be ! be able to handle, that. He stated that because of the ~tion it should make it safe for children and suggested speed limits in this area do need to be adjusted. ~p stated that the children are using the crossings now t~ te parks. Porter spokesman for the River Park Property Owners .on appeared before the Board to speak regarding the net Culpepper stated her concern for the danger of the She stated that she has driven bythis property for many. .d this property has gone downhill for years. She"stated .s an eyesore to her.as a passerby~ she does not live in ~borhood, and she stated that if she did live in the .ood she would be much more upset about the building being ause it would de-value her property for worse. She stated last time she had seen the building it had half a dozen ~indows and some kind of boards all over it. It just ful, it looked like a very vacant piece of property, that if you rmally wanted to worry about children a child could be dragged im there and no one would be the wiser for who knows how 3 long.. Si been imp]. she tUr~: down fur' it look ] Mr. Port -Commissi, to ~ake deplorabl that's w! try to m~ Mr. Port( should Commissi~ Several ~ in oppos2 Commissi~ property Commissi~ Doctor's Mr. Mill~ ~e asked Mr. Porter that as far as the sight of it has it roved? She stated that when she goes to her sister's house ; left to avoid that intersection to go through to Floresta 2her. She asked if it still looks the way it has or does ~etter now.? - ~r stated no it doesn't. ,net Culpepper stated that she is someone that is supposed a decision about properties, do you leave a pre-existing [e condition, she further stated that she was sorry, but ~at she thought~itwas for the neighborhood sake, or do you ~ke a difference in another way. ~r ~ stated that the building did look deplorable now and it improved. ner. Culpepper stated that it did to her. djacent property owners appeared before the Board to speak .tion to the petition. mer Culpepper explained the PNRD process to one of the owners. her Culpepper asked Mr. Miller whether or not this were a office would deceleration be required for it2 ~r stated no m am. Commissioner Culpepper stated that it'was not a question of whethe~ or not i~is going to be a store or a Doctor's office there is not enough generate traffic on a site that small to cause less to be put in. - . Mr. Miller stated practically speaking that is correct. Commissioner Culpepper stated that this would really be a dumb question~ but si~c~ she had seen all those plans, and because of a ~emark the last gentleman had said had made.her concerned. She asked Mr~ Houston if they were plann%ng to tear down the pre- existing[structures on this place? Mr. Hous~ Commissi( that, and this petJ .on stated yes mam. her Culpepper stated that she just wanted to make sure of that they were going to disappear before she voted yes on tion. Mr. Houston stated that there was probably a lot of property owners that would be in favor of this petition if they had known about it. 4 In closing Mr. Houston addressed signalization and suggested maybe the speed limits need to be adjusted. The tape~ended with a question from Comm. Trefelner, which wasn't recorded~ Date: Sept~ Tape: 1, 2 Commissionex R. Dale Tref Others Pres~ County Atto Virta, Com~ DeveloPment Southard, Pu McLam, Recr~ Sheriff's of '~For Reso. consi( resolutior and III az be known M~. Doug Com. Culp( this issu( I-t was mc Res oluti o] unanimous i BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING ST. IUCI~. CO-r FL '; ] mber 20, 1994 convened: 7:00 p.m. adjourned: 9:00 p.m. s Present: Chairman,. HaVert L. Fenn, Judy Culpepper; elner, Denny Green, Cliff Barnes nt: Tom Kindred, County Administrator; Dan McInty~, rney; Dan Kurek, Management/Budget Director; Terry [unity Development Director; Dennis Murphy, Land Manager; Ronald Brown, Public. Works Director; Jack blic Safety Manager; Wally Rushing, Parks Manager; Don ation Manager; Don West, County Engineer; P. O' Brien, fice; A. Millie White,· Deputy Clerk ution No. 94-150/HCA Realty eration before the Board was Resoiution No. 94-150, _a granting final planned'development.approval for Phase II a"dhange in zoning from AR-1 to-PNRD for a project to s White City Medical Office Park."' )avis, petitioner, addressed the Bb. ard. on this item. ~,pper advised the Board she would abstain from voting on red by Com. Barnes, ~ NO. 94-150; and -y. seconded by Com. upon rot.1 -call Green to approve motion carried BOARD OF COUNTY C. OMMI.SSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY', FLORIDA REGULAR- MEETING CO~IUNtT'f ST. LUCIF_. _CO.~ FL Date: September 6, 1994 convened: 7: 01'p. m. Tape: 1-2 adjourned: 9:27 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Havert L.-.Fenn, Judy Culpepper, Denny Gree 1, Cliff Barnes, R. Dale Trefelner (absent prior commi tme nt ) Others Pre: ent: Tom Kindred, County .Administrator; ' Dan -Kurek, Management ~udget Administrator; Dan McIntyre, 'County Attorney; Heather .¥olrng, Asst. 'County Attorney; Terry Virta, Community Development Director; 'Dennis Murphy, Land Development Manager, Joseph Matf~it, Acquisitions Manager; Don West; C.ount~_.Enginee.r; - .J'a~k--. South~rd, P. ublic,.. Safetyl-.Director; Don' McLa.m,-...Recreatibn Manager; Bi Ma.nager;' A% Lt- Miller, Planning-_ Manager;- Donna Be.ach~ - Purchasing · Mi'tlie Wh'~te,' 'Deputy clerk ' " ~esolution No. 94-156/St. Lucie Oaks(I-0292) deration before the Board, was Resolution No. 94-156, a n ektending the Final PUD/PNRD approval for the project St. Lucie Oaks PUD/PNRD. ved by Com. -Green, seconded by Com.-Culpepper to approve n No. 94-156; and, upon roll call motion carried ly. ' For cons re s.ol uti c known as It was mo Resolutio unanimous Date: Sept Tape: 1-2 Commissione~ Denny Gree] commitment). Others Pres Management/! Heather You Development Joseph Malf~ Jack~ Southa Manager; Bi] Manager; A. Reso For consi resolutio modify th for Phase I t was mc item from carried u Com. Culp from votil item. The Ptann res i de nts condi ti on~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE couNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING ~mber 6, 1994 rs Present: convened: adjourned: 7:01 p.m. 9:27 p.m. Chairman, Havert L. Fenn, Judy Culpepper, Cliff Barnes, R. Dale Trefelner (absent prior =_nt: Tom Kindred, County Administrator; Dan Kurek, tudget Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney; ng, Asst. County Attorney; Terry Virta, Community Director; Dennis Murphy, Land Development Manager, tit, Acquisitions Manager;' 'Don-West, County Engineer; rd, Public . Safety Dire.c~or; Don McLam, Recreation .1 Miller, Planning Manager; Donna-Beach, Pu'rcha~ing Millie White, Deputy Clerk . - tution No. 94-125/Eckerd Drug Phase II(1-1960) deration before the Board, was Resolution No. 94-125, a granting a change in zoning from RS-4 to PNRD and to preliminary PNRD and obtain Final Development approval II of the project known as Eckerd Drugs PNRD. zed by Com. Barnes, seconded _by Com. Green, to lift this the table for discussion; and, upon roll call, motion .~ani mous 1 y. ~pper advised the Board and the public she would abstain and participating in the discussion pertaining to this ng Manager distributed various letters received from area stating their support for the project and also read the stated in the resolution. Mr. Robert ~Klein, attorney representing the-petitioner, addressed the Boa]~d on this item and' advised them the petitioner is in agreemen Mr. Don the proj Ms. Deb~ favor of Mr. Mich Board Mr. Mich the proj Mr. But addresse dumpster Com. Gre who requ Blvd. ar Com. Gre, reiterat Mr. Kell spoken express objectio: Mr. Greg project, It Was m Reso!uti( upon rol: t with the conditions listed. Cerrito, property owner, addressed the Board in favor of ect. rah Klein, 201 N. E. Arbor Ave., addressed the Board in the project. ael Keeler, business owner and land owner, addressed the favor of the project. ~el Kane, 4900 River Place, ~addressed the Board in favor of ~ct. ~,h TerPening from the firm Culpepper and Terpening, Com. Green's questions on the landscape area and the area. .n stated he received a letter from Walter and Bobby Deemer ested putting this off until the plans for Prima Vista completed. ~n stated he had previously voted against this project and ~d his reasons for the negative vote. from the Planning Department advised Com. Green he had 'ith the owner of lot 29 and the property owner had some concern, however, he has not heard or seen a formal from the property owner. Boggs, Tom Lucido Associates, Landscape Architect for the addressed the Board regarding his plan for the project. oved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Green, to approve )n No. 94-125, including the conditions as listed; and, call, motion carried unanimously. BOARD COMMIS August 2~ Ms. Conn, 7648 Wyi¢ Port St. Subject-. COUNTY ,ION£RS ,, 1994 e E, Bishop [wood Way Lucie, Florida COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TERRY L. VIRTA, AICP 34986 SOutheast Corner of Prima Vista Blvd. & Airoso Boulevard Dear Ms. Bishop: As you a 'e aware, over the past few weeks the County has r~ceived several inquiries regarding the development status and condition of the propE~rties at the southeast corner of Prima Vista and Airoso Boulevards.. Recent field visits to this site by Code Enforcement staff ac~nowledged the fact that the grass around these homes has been cut and that as of this date there are no noticeable code violatiors, with the exception of one (1) unsecured door into the carport utility room on the corner property. However, at the time these properties were rezoned from RS-4 to PNRD, rej~resentations were made that these homes would soon be removed. Our office has been asked what the time table is for the removal Df these structures and since we cannot answer this question, we thought it best to ask you. When can we, the County expect t~e removal of these structures as was represented to the Board of If there would apl not beinc you have County Commissioners on April 5, 19947 are no plans to remove them in the immediate future, I reciate a brief explanation of why this representation is carried out. We look forward to hearing from you and if any questions, please let us know. Si~e~rely, j-" ,~ . Terry ~ir~a, AICP Deve~pme~t Director TLV/DJM/cb KONTRY1 ( uu ) ( at c¢: County Code HAVER]- L. FENN. District No. ' - tachments ) Administrasc r >mpliance Manager IDY CULPEPPER District No 2 o DENNY GREEN, District No. 3 - R DAL5 T~5zEuNER. District No. 4 - CLIFF BARNES, District No. 5 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 (407) 468-1590 - Growth Management: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407) 468-t576 Codes Compliance: (407) 468-1571 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 3-A - PUBLIC HEARING PETITION OF CONNIE BISHOP- RES NO. 94-017 MINUTES OF APRIL 5, 1994 Chairman Fenn stated that this petition is for granting the approval of Resolution No. 04-017 granting Preliminary and Final Planned Development approval and a change ' ' in zoning from CO (Commerce.al Off~ce) to PNRD (.Planned Non Residential Development) with the recommended conditions. This petition is located_at the Southeas~ ~ corner of Prima Vista Boulevard and Airoso Boulevard in Port St. Lucie. Chairman Fenn then asked for a recommendation to lift this item from the table of the March 22, 1994 meeting. Commissicner Culpepper made a motion to lift this item from the table, and upon roll call, the Board voted unanimously in favor of motion. Bill Mi]ier, Planning Director addressed the Board on this petition. j He then stated the conditions included in the approval of the petition as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission: 1. All lighting facilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind -to adjoining streets or properties; and Signs permitted for the preliminary and final PUD shall be limited to the following: Freestanding Project Signs' - Primary Street Frontage - 1 sign, maximum 32 sq. ft. maximum 10 feet high. · Other Major Sign Frontage (Airoso Boulevard) - 1 sign maximum 16 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. Facade Signs - A maximum of 150 sq. ft. of facade signs shall be permitted. The permitted sign area may be divided to provide the facade signs facing Prima Vista Blvd. Allowance for Double Faced and Lighted Signs - Ail signs may be double faced and directly or indirectly lighted. Mr. Mill signs. Setbacks for Signs - Ail signs shall be located a ~inimum of ten feet from any right-of-way and five feet from any adjoining property line. ~r further explained the reasons for the conditions for the e Only those retail trade uses which are identified as permitted in Section 3.00.01 (Q)(2)(f), CN (Commercial Neighborhood, St. Lucie County Land Development Code) shall be authorized within the area described in part C except that gasoline services shall not be permitted. withMr' Millthe ~rconditionsStated thatas staffstated.recommended approval of this petition Commissi¢~ner Culpepper stated that there was some debate .at the Z ~ Planning and onlng meeting that there was discussion on where the loading and unloading may take place. She asked Mr. Miller whether or not t~at ~ssue had been resolved. Mr. Mill. r stated that the loading area be attached to the building as requi~ed by the C?de. He stated that the applicant had agreed to move the loading area next to the building. Commissioner Culpepper asked Mr. Miller whether or not that particular problem had been corrected? Mr. Mills Commissio.. overhead Mr. Mille applicant Commissi01 Community stated yes. her Barnes asked for clarification of the red area in the 2ransparencies. Mr. Mille] Corridor ~ may event been scheculed with the public. ~ explained that there are two homes unoccupied on the 's property and the rest of the parcel is vacant. ~er Green asked whether or not there were plans from Development for the use of the intersections. ~ stated that staf~ had been looking at the Prima Vista !or several months He stated that the entire corridor ~ally be Commercial. Another neighborhood meeting has 2 Mr. Mict and the Board. Ms. Con] explain · el Houston from the firm of Houston, Cuozzo Group, Inc., agent for the petitioner presented the petition to the ie Bishop, the petitioner appeared before the Board to the design and operation of the proposed business. Mr. Mar~y Sanders from the engineering Ferrari~and~ Hellstrom apPeared before concern of traffic problems. Commissi casual t Mr. Bart business Ms. Bish firm of Lindahi, Browning, the Board to discuss the oner Trefelner stated that it was important to clarify the rips as opposed to the commercial trips. ~s asked what the business hours would be for the proposed op stated she would be open until 10 P.M. Mr~ Barnes stated that this would be a dangerous intersection for children to cross coming from the parks to the store. He stated that he ~hought there would be injuries to children in the future because~f c~ossing the intersection to the store. Mr. HouSton| stated that the majority of the children should be older an~ be able to handle that. He stated that because of the signalization it should make it safe for children and suggested that the Ms. Bish get to ti Mr. Don Associat~ petition Commissi~ children~ years, that it the neig neighbort there bec that the missing looked aK if you dragged speed limits in this area do need to be adjusted. )p ~tated that the children are using the crossings now to le parks. Porter spokesman for the River Park Property Owners ion appea~ed before the Board to speak regarding the ~ner Culpepper stated her concern for the danger of the She stated that she has driven by this proper~y fo~ many ~d this property has gone downhill for years. She stated ~s an eyesore to her as a passerby~ she does not live in hborho0d, and she stated that if she did live in the ~ood she would be much more upset about the building being ause it would de-value her property for worse. She stated last time she had seen the building it had half a dozen ~indows and some kind of boards all over it. It just 'ful, it looked like a very vacant piece of property, that eally wanted to worry about children a child could be n there and no one would be the wiser for who knows how been imp she turn down fur it lOok long. She asked Mr. Porter that as far as the sight of it has it roved? She stated that when she goes to her sister's house s left to avoid that intersection to go through to Floresta ther. She asked if it still looks the way it has or does better now.? Mr. Port Commissm to make deplorab that's wi try to m Mr. Port, should b~ Commissi, Several in oppos2 Commissi property Commissi¢ Doctor's Mr. Mille Commissi or not it enough gE put in. Mr. Mille Commissic question, remark tk asked Mr. existing Mr. Houst Commissio that, and this peti Mr. Houst( er stated no it doesn't. ~ner Culpepper stated that she is someone that ~s supposed a decision about properties, do you leave a pre-existing le condition, she further stated that she was sorry, but hat she thought it was for the neighborhood sake, or do you ~ke a difference in another way. ~r stated that the building did look deplorable now and it improved. net Culpepper stated that it did to her. .djacent property owners appeared before the Board to speak .tion to the petition. ~ner Culpepper explained the PNRD process to one of the owners. ~ner Culpepper asked Mr. Miller whether or not this were a office would deceleration be required for it? stated no mam. %er Culpepper stated that it was not a question of whether ms going to be a store or a Doctor's office there is not :nerate traffic on a site that small to cause less to be stated practically speaking that is correct. ner Culpepper stated that this would really be a dumb but since she had seen all those plans, and because of a last gentleman had said had made her concerned. She Houston if they were planning to tear down the pre- structures on this place? mn stated yes mam. ~er Culpepper stated that she just wanted to make sure of that they were going to disappear before she voted yes on zion. n stated that there was probably a lot of property owners that woul( be in favor of this petition if they had known about it. In closi~g Mr. Houston addressed signalization and suggested maybe the speed limits need to b~ adjusted. The tape ended with a question from Comm. Trefelner, which wasn't recorded. BOA D OF COUNTY COMMISSiON Michael Ho HOUSTON 49 Flagler ;~tuart, FL 3, RE: Dear Mr. Ho, This letter is to County, Florid~ Office to A copy of the Sincerely, BOA~PD 01~' C06 $~ LUCZ~ COU~ Have, L. Fe~, ttLF/dj H.'I Ve~PICBURGE$$~( Enclosure 7UOZzo GROUP enue, SUite $-B t994 ~LUTION GR4NTING .4 CH`4NGE IN ZONING 'to~: TERRY L. VIRTA, :°nfirm that on April 5, 1994, the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie (Planned.Non.ResMenttai. · DevelopmenO. approved Resolution 94-OI7 for a change in zoning from. . CO (Commercia~ ~rded Resolution No. 94-017 is enclosed for your information. ]VT COMMISSIONER~ 'C-DOC$1C ONFiRM. RE$ FENN, D/sITicr No. 1 o JUDy CULPEf DER, District No 2 ' · ° R. DALE TREFELNER. District No 4 ,300 Virginio Avenue (407) 468-1 590 ° Gr°wth Management: (407) 468-1553 . Planning: (407)468-1576 Codes Compliance: (407) 468-1571 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 -114 )-- 15 ~ 16 <¢:. 17 18 ~ 19 20 21 o 22 ~ 23 24 26 ,27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 JoAnne Hotman, Clerk of the Circuit court File Number: ~,1318551 OR BOOK ReCorded: 0,~,,~8-94 08:51 A.M. RESOLUTION NO. 94-017 File: RZ-94-002, SP-94-007 - St. Lucie County ;0 8 9 5 PAGE 1 ~ow\ A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PI,AN APPROVAL FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS'CONNIE'S KOUNWRY JUNCTION (RIVER PARK), A PLANrN-ED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, 32~D FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WltEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: a change Developme held a publ: hearing and and recom~ described re NonResider publishing a owners of p: April 5, 199, Comprehem County Lan~ CHANGE IN ZONING Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. presented a petition for Connie E. Bishop for [ zoning from CO (COmmercial, Office) to PNRD (Planned NonResidential at) for the property described below. On February 24, 1994, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission .c hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 15 days prior to the notifying by mail ali owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, aended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereinafter quest for a change in zoning from CO (Commercial, Office) to PNRD (Planned :iai Development) for the property described below. On March 22, 1994, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and notifying by mail all · operty within 500 feet of the subject property. That hearing was continued to The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the St. Lucie County ive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie t Development Code. SITE PLAN The petitioner is proposing a 4,876 square foot store at the southeast corner ta Blvd. and Airoso Blvd. to be known as Connie's Kountry Junction. of Prima Vis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 · for the pro with the fu conditions held a pub] and ma/ted recommem known as ( notice was owners wit and standm Comprehen 10. property, th other matte: 11. proposed pr and screenir 12. interfere wi. applicable d: The Development Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary site plan )osed project and found it to meet all technical requirements and to be consistent ure land use maps from the St, Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the ~et forth in SeCtion A of this resolution. On February 24, 1994, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission ic hearing of ~hich due public notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News to all property owners within 500 feet at least 15 days prior to the hearing, and ted to this Board that Preliminary Development Plan approval for the project :onnie's Koumry Junction be granted. This Board held a public hearing on March 22, 1994, of which due public )ublished in the Port St. Lucie News and mailed notice was sent to all property 500 feet. That hearing was continued to April 5, !994. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, · ds of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County sive"PIan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the ~ject on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping g. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to :h the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with strict regulations. 13. The pr. oposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. 14. The applicant has demonstrated that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to'provide adequate fire protection. 0 0 0 01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 t3 14' 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4.0 41 42 43 45 NOW, Tm Lucie Cou change in Developmc and a chan~ Developme: below. the site pta Residential project pret received by~ subject to tlr :REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the St. ~ty, Florida: CHANGE IN ZONING Preliminary and Final Planned Non-Residential Development.approval and a oning from CO (Commercial, Office) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential nt) is granted for the property descffbed as follows: N 1/2 of Section 28 Township 36 South Range 40 East, The West 10 feet of Lot 17 and all of lots 18, 19, and 20 of Block 50 of River Park Unit 5 according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 31 of the public records of St. Lucie County, FL. (Location: 204 SE Prima Vista Blvd., 206 SE Prima Vista Blvd., and 115 SE Airoso Blvd., Port St. Lucie, FL) This Preliminary and Final Planned Non-Residential Development approval e in zoning from CO (Commercial, Office) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential at) is granted subject to the site plan and conditions specified in Section C. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie CounW Land Development Code, n for the project known as Connie's Kountry Jt[nction - A Planned Non- Development, is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the tared by Houston Cuozzo Group, dated March 8, 1994, and date stamped he St. Lucie County Community Development Admin/strator on March 8, 1994, e fotlo~dng conditions: All fighting fac/lities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or properties. The signs permitted for the preliminary and final PNRD shall be limited to the following: Freestanding Project Signs Pr/mary Street Frontage (Pr/ma Vista Blvd.) - 1 sign, maximum 32 square feet, maximum 10 feet-high. Other Major Sign Frontage (Airoso Blvd.) - 1 sign, maximum 16 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 = with Sectioz site plan al: determined comply volu become nul in Section C Developmen granted by ti Facade Signs A maximum of 150 square feet of facade signs shall be permitted. The permitted sign area may be divided to provide for facade signs facing Prima Vista Blvd. and Airoso Blvd. Allowance for Double Faced and Lighted Signs All signs may be double faced and directly or indirectly lighted. Setbacks for Signs All signs shall be located a minimum of ten feet from any right-of-way and five feet from any adjoining property line. Only those retail trade uses which are identified as permitted in Section 3.00.01 (Q)(2)(f), (CN Commercial, Neighborhood, St. Lucie County Land Development Code) shall be authorized within the area described in part C except that gasoline services shall not be permitted. The hours of operat/on shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. GENERAL CONDITIONS This Final Planned Non-Residential Development approval shall expire on 5, uniess building permits are issued or an extension is granted in accordance 11.02.06.B.3, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The conditions set forth in Section C are an integral nonseverable part of the ?royal .granted by this resolution. If any condition set forth in Section C is to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to lmrily w/th that condition, the site plan approval granted by tiffs resolution shall and void. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described , which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community t Administrator. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was te Community Development Administrator on March 22, 1994. 0 ¢) 01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23- 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Aft PAS ATTEST: r motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Haven L. Fenn Vice-Chairman Denny Green Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Judy Culpepper Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE NAY NAY AYE AYE AND DULY ADOPTED This 5th Day of April 1994. oam: OF COUN coma S 6 : sr. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORit~A' - Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: /' 0 0 0 ST LuCzE COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF CAPACITY This facility c adopted in TYPE NO. 2. PROP ~419, PRIM ® CERTIFICATE NO. :C94-047 ent certifies that concurrenc~ will be met and that adequate p~blic apacity exists to maintain the standards for levels_of service as the St. Lucie Count~ Comprehensive Plan for: OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER: ..MAJOR SITE PLAN - PNRD. )F UNITS: N/A, NO. OF SQUARE FEET: 4,960 :RT¥ LEGAL DESCRIPTION & TAX I.D.# (& STREET ADDRESS): '540-0241-000/5 & 3419-540-0242-000/0 ~ONNIE'S KOUNTRY STORE . VISTA BLVD/AIROSO BLVD RIVERPARK S/D BLK 50 LOTS .i7P,18,19,20 APPR( SUB J] NONI. OW~E~ ADDRE ~$: VAL #: _.RES #:94-017 CT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS FOR CONCURRENCY: 'S NAME:'BISHOP, CONNIE 7684 WYLDWOOD WAY ~T ST LUCIE, FL 34986 6. CERTI This Certif same parcel as listed terms and certificate, property, SIGNED: ~ICATE EXPIRATION DATE: 03-22-9~5 Lcate of Capacity is transferable only to subsequent owners of the ~ and is subject to the same terms, conditions, and expiration date ;rein. The expiration date can be extended only under the same )nditions as the underlying development o~der issued with this . or for subsequent development order ( s ) ~s-des_crib~d ~herein. issued for the .same Community Development Administrator $5. LUCIE COUNT~, FLORIDA 0 0 0 M'[ ROAD CR ST. DRIV !STA ST. LUC]]~ tll MART~[N PROJECT LOCATTON t COUNTY NTY ,SAVANNA CLUB BLVD ROAD 2 SOL ~ D A DR ~[ V~ DRAINAGE DITCH ]:MA -V~[STA BLV 5 6 7 8 9 2t 22 24- SOLAZ AVENUE BON T'TA COURT 2 ~[MA VISTA BLV SOLIDA DRIVE DRAINAGE DITCH 5 6 7 8 9 21 22 SOLAZ AVENUE 2'5 24 BONITA COURT LLJ 2 PRzTMA 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 VISTA 21 22 23 24 SOL]DA DRIVE I I DRA~[NAGE DTTCH BLVD SOLAZ AVENUE BONITA COURT ST_ J DRIVE PROJECT LOCATION SAVANNA CLUB BLVD C..( COUNTY JNTY 'V~$TA BLV $~ SOLiO'A DRIVE Vt-STA Date: A~ Tape: 1 -. Commissioz Denny GreE :il 5, 1994 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI SSI ONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING convened: 7:10 p.m. adjourned: 12:50 a.m. ters Present: Chairman, Havert L. Fenn, JudF Culpepper, ~n, R. Dale Trefelner, Cliff Barnes Others Pr ;sent: "!r'o~-~ Kindred, County Admi'~istrator; D~ Kurek, Management/Budget Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney; Jim Lanc as ter, As s t. County Attorney; Terry Vi rta, Communi ty Development Adnd. nis trator; Dennis Murphy, Land Development Manager; Joseph Malfait, Acquisition Director; Curtis King, Airport Director;-~.{onald Brown, Public Works Administrator; Jack'Southard, :Director P:tbli'c Safety; Morris Adger, Port Director; Donna Beach, Purchasing Director; Bill Miller, Planning Director; Leo Cordeiro, Solid Wast{ Director; Don McLam, Recreation Director; Sam Amerson, Utilities, W. Linsen, Sheriff's office; A. Millie White,-Deputy Clerk ' REGULAR 3GENDA -' ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS A. COM~ Reso. for Conni Planned~ D~ (This iter It was mov this item unani m ous 1 The P1 ann stated th~ Mr. Mich. ae. representi this item. DEVELOPMENT tution No. 94-017/Petition of Houston CUozzo Group, Inc. e Bishop, a resolution granting Preliminary and Final ivelopment approval and change in zoning from Co to PNRD. was tabled on March 22, 1994) ~,d by Com. ~ ]~ --~u~me~per,and,Seconded by Com. Trefelner, to lift from the table; upon roll call, motion carried Y. ng Director addressed the Board on this p~oject and conditions included in the resolution. Houston from the firm Houston, Cuozzo Group, Inc. and ~g the petitioner, Connie Bishop, addressed the Board on Mr. Housto advised the Board of the difficult time Ms. h-ad in kee ~ing this Bishop has property rented. Ms. Con general Mr. Mar Ferrari, compari~ Com. Ba~ and cros Mr. Don of this Mr. Port~ Park Hom, ~to the t was to establis] Com. Cul~ Mrs. Lee Owners, a Mrs. Cec.~ peti ti on- zoning ch Mrs. Ki afraid th congregat. will attr Ms. Pamel Board thal concern Mr. Walt the s tore T~" P1 anni per 1000 f Mr. John children r: the way th Mr. Davis, be mainly Mr. Thomas themelie 'Bishop, of the the building, petitioner, addressed the Board on the ty Sander_s, w. ,~_n~neer from the firm Lindhal, Browning, and Hellstrom, addressed the Board regarding the traffic on. neSingaddressedthe busy highway, the children being attracted to this store ?otter, River Park resident, .~roj ect. addressed the Board in favor r advised the Board that many of the members of the River ~owners association are in opposition to this project due ~affic and. the danger to the c.h~ldren. Also, River Park be residential and they do not want ~ments in River Park. commercial epper spoke on the condition of the property. Primerano, River Park resident, representing the Home ddressed the Board in opposition to this zoning change. lia Kirby, 174 W. Prima Vista Blvd., PSL submitted a with 132 signatures stating their opposition to this ange. , stated the reason for the petition was the residents are s-store would bring crime into' the area, children will ~ct~' androdents.the dumpsters will not be-kept under control and Shatola,'-area r6sident and 'school 'teacher advised the "she~-c°ncurred w/th Mrs. Kirby, s comments and expressed th the children in the area. re°°ney'quire.area resident asked how many parking spaces will ng Director advised Mr. Cooney the code states 5 spaces t. a requirement of 24 spaces and ! handicapped. Salerno, area resident advised the Board that many ~y'deshould.their bicycles, in the area.and do not observe traffic long time area resident, stated the area doesn't need to :ommercial. traffic pa~tern be made of the area before establishments are placed. Castle, area resident, suggested more studies of the anymore commercial Mr. Ed applicat Mr. Hous and sug¢ adj us t~ a commer, Com. Cut the way i for as lo some of ti that road that prob the remar into by tl Chairman whether th corridor. It was mo approve t! the new on fr~m 6:00 follows: motion ca= Luer, area property owner, asked, the Board to consider his .i°~ when he comes before them in the near future. ton made his closing comments and addressed signalization 'ested maybe the speed limits in this area need to be Com. Gte ~n Stated he could not support this ch ' - that he as seen the area' develop into a ~pur~s .... ang~ean~ recreation for the reason type area wit~ various institutional buildings. He doesn, t feel we hive an oblig~.tion just because a road changes and a road gains traffic that we neea to go in and change the nat Also he doesn, t think we have an ^~ ~' __~u. re o.f whole neighborhoods. because t is not economicall._"f~a,=!On ~o, change %oning simpl y easible, we nave ..... Y an um'~gation to maintain the integrity of some of the neighborhoods in the style and fashi°nialWhiChoffice.they have been "since ind~ption and would prefer _epper sta~ed that probably if the .r - presently does, and if ~ ~=-, = ?operty d~d not look .~g as she coul~ ...... ~ .~ ~ peen the wav it' ~ been ~ ~=~,=mmer, She would probably ~oncur with ~e remarks. If the County has a signalization problem on that's dangerous for children, we need to something about .em regardless of ~what sits on that corner and she hopes [s about the problem with signalization would be looked ~e Public Works department. ?enn stated that Prima Vista will continue to change is Board is present or not. It is a major east and west co . Culpepper, ~e cha~ge, in zoning withsec°haled by Com. Trefelner, to all stipulations as noted plus e about the lOadin~ zone and the hours of operation being a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; and, upon roll call, the vote was as r/ed'qaY' s :. by .BarneS ,a VoteGreenof 3 to; Aye,2. s: Culpepper, Trefelner, Fenn; Date: March Tape: 1-5 Commissioner~ Denny Green, present and attendance a~ Others Prese~ Management/Bu Terry. Virta,. ( and Bridge .D~ Publ i c Works Director; Bil Director; Don Waste Directo White, Deputy orCOMMU~ Resol~ Connie BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING ~2, 1994 convened: adjourned: Present: Chairman, Havert L. Fenn, Cliff Barnes, (Corn' ~% R. Dale Trefelner and Judy Culpepper were not advis~~ the balance of the Board they would be in 2:00 p.m. ) It: Tom Kindred, County Administrator; Dan Kurek, dget Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney; '.ommunity De.vel opment Administrator; Mike Bowers, Road ~-rector; Curtis King, Airport Director; Ron Brown, Admini s trator; Charles Bi cht, Central Services 1 Miller, Planning Director; Gayla Barwick, ToUriSm na Beach, Purchasing Director; Leo Cordeiro, Solid ¢;CterkJ°Anne Holman, Clerk of Circuit Court; A. Millie ETY DEVELOPMENT(I-10280) .tion No. 94-017/Petition of Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. E. Bishop The petitioner had'requested for this item to be hear~ at 11:00 am, reschedule<h°wever' d~e to the inconvenience, it caused those present it was It was mow by Com.. Green, sec6nded by Com. Barnes, to table this itsm for Apcil 5,..1994, at 7:00 p.m. or soon thereafter; and. upon roll call, notion carried unanimously. 9:14 a.m. 5:25 p.m. Date: Tape: March 1, 1994 1-4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING L ST. LUCE CO.. ?L .... ~ convened: 9:20 a.m. adjourned: 3:37 p.m. Commissi~>ners Present: Chairman, Havert L. Fenn; Judy Culpepper; Denny Gr~en: Cliff Barnes; R. Dale Trefelner Others Manageme] Heather Developm( Curtis Admi nis t Adger, Miller, Amers on, Sheri f f, COMMUNI The Board a~ fol~wing Pu - Petit Commercial 0 - Petil Commerci al.. o . -Petiti Res identi al, -Petiti permit to op. -Petiti Commercial, Neighborhood resent: Tom Kindred, County Administrator; D'~ ~:~ Kurek, It/Budget Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney; Young, Asst. County Attorney; Terry Virta, Community ;nt Administrator; Joseph Malfait, Acquisition Director; ii ng, Airport Director; Ronal d Brown, Public Works 'ator; Charles Bicht, Central Services Director; Morris Drt Director; Linda Childress, Finance Director; Bill ~lanning Director; ~'Donna Beach~ Purchasing Director; Sam Utilities; JoAnne Holman, Clerk of Courts; W. Linsen, office; A. Millie white, Deputy Clerk TY DEVELOPMENT proved staffs, request to authorize and advertise the blic hearings for March 22, 1994: :ion of Connie Bishop for a change in zoning from ffice to Planned Non-Residential Development. :ion of Edward Bauer for a change in zoning from ffice to Commercial Neighborhood. )n of George Brown for a change in zoning from Multiple Family to Agricultural, Residential. )n of John Jetson Pest Control for a conditional use ;n a pest control service. )n of Richard Oidfield for a change in zoning from Dffice and Agricultural, Residential to Commercial, i -'I REGULAR MEETING Date: Tape: February 1, 1994 1-3 convened: 9:10 a.m. adJourned: ! 2:25 p.m. Commis s i oner~ Cliff Barnes. R. Dale Trefelner, Denny Green Others Pres e~ Manageme nt/Bu Terry Virta, Land Deveto~ 'Director; Cur' Admi nis trat or Beach, Puroh~ Line eR,' Sheri ePermiset Board app public hearin Pet! ti on change i Petition CN. date. Present: Chairman, Havert L. Fenn; Judy Culpepper, It: Tom .Kindred, County Administrator; Dan Kurek, dget Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney; Community Development Administrator; Dennis Murphy, ment Administrator; Joseph Malfait, Acquisition :is King, Airport Director; Ronald Brown, Public Works ; Charles Bio,hr, Central Services Director; .Donna Lsing Director; JoAnne Holman, Clerk of Court; W. ff's office, A. Millie White, Deputy Clerk on to advertise - roved staff's request to advertise for the following gs t~ be held on February 22, 1994: of New Testament Baptist Church of America, Inc. for a zoning from RS-4 to RF. of Connie Bishop for a change in zoning from CO to (th. ts item was withdrawn and will be heard at a future Petition of Bernard F. Powell for a change in zoning from RS-4 to PNRD. TO: BOARD OF SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Dra BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTI( RECOMMENDATION ~OMMISSION AC~ [ ] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Mgt.& Budget: Public Works Admin: Leisure Services: Finance Director: AGENDA REQUEST COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Community Development ITEM NO. 3A DATE: 04/05/94 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING IX] CONSENT [ ] !t Resolution 94-017 PRESENTED BY: nity D~v. Admin. Petition of Houston Cuozzo~Group, Inc. for Connie E. Bishop for Preliminary and Final Planned Development Plan approval and for a change in zoning from CO (Commercial, Office) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development). (File No. RZ-94- 002, SP-94-007) Location: Southeast corner of Prima Vista Boulevard and Airoso Boulevard N/A .~: Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation .for approval at the February 24, 1994 meeting.. The public hearing on this petition was'continued by this Board on March 2.2, 1994, to'April 5, 1994. Approve Draft Resolution 94-017. ~ON: [ ] DENIED CONCURRENCE: Thomas R.L. Kindred- County Administrator .Coordination/siqnature e Assr. Co. Admin: Prop. Acq. Dir: Utilities Set: Purchasing Dir: Comm. Der. Admin: Engineering Dir.: Grants Coor: Other: COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: April 5, 1994 Resolution 94-017 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNI~ DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From.- Community Development Administrator Date: March 25, 1994 Subject: Petition of Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. for Connie E. Bishop for Prelim/nary and Final Planned Development Plan approval and for a change in zoning from CO (Commercial, Office) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development). On and Final the request Boulevard. The continued o~ Cuozzo Grot basis that n~ Comm5ssiom 5, 1994. At itl 1994, you will be asked to review the referenced petition for Preliminary Development Plan approval and for a change in zoning from CO to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development). . The purpose of to allow for the construction and operation of Connie's Kountry Junction, a store, at the southeast coruer of Prima Vista Boulevard and Airoso ,etition for this change to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) was March 22, 1994, at the request of the petitioner. The petitioner, Houston ~p, Inc. for Connie E. Bishop, requested the continuance on this matter on the )t all Commissioners were present for the hearing. The Board of County ',rs continued the public hearing on this petition to its. regular meeting of April , February 24,-1994, hearing on this matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommefided approval by a vote of 5-4 of this petition with the conditions contained in Draft Resolution 94-017. March 25, 1994 Page 2 Project: Connie~s Kountry Junction Stal conditions, protecting The ~ recommends that this petition be approved as a PNRD with the following which would allow for the construction and operation of this building while the character Of the neighborhood. conditions, are as follows: All lighting facilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or properties. The signs permitted for the preliminary and final PNRD shall be limited to the following: Freestanding Project Signs Primary Street Frontage (Prima Vista Blvd.) - 1 sign, maximum 32 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. Other Major Sign Frontage (Airoso Blvd.) - 1 sign, maximum 16 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. Facade Signs A maximum of 150 square feet of facade signs shall be permitted. The permitted sign area may be divided to provide for facade signs facing Prima Vista Blvd. and Airoso Blvd. Allowance for Double Faced and Lighted Signs AH signs ma~'be double faced and directly or indirectly lighted. Setback~ for Signs All signs shall be located a minimum of ten feet from any right-of-way and five feet from any adjoining property line. Only those retail trade uses which are identified as permitted in Section 3.00.01 (Q)(2)(f), (CN Commercial, Neighborhood, St. Lucie County Land Development Code) shall be authorized within the area described in part C except that gasoline serv/ces shall not be permitted. March 25, i994 Page 3 Project: Connie's Kountry Junction T~L. Virta / - Attachments hf cc: Cotu Press Hou~ File ~y Attorney Public :on Cuozzo Group, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Wt made the a change ir Developme! held a publi hearing and and recomn described re~ NonResiden ge publishing a owners of pr April 5, 199~1 Comprehensi County Land Se of Pr/ma Visl RESOLUTION NO. 94-017 File: RZ-94-002, SP-94-007 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS CONNIE'S KOUNTRY JUNCTION (RIVER PARK) - A PLANNED NON-RESIDENT/AL DEVELOPMENT, AND FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ~REAS, the Board of.County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has fi)llowing determinations: CHANGE IN ZONING Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. presented, a petition for Connie E, Bishop for zoning from CO (Commercial, Office) to PNRD (Planned NonResidemial it) for the property described below. On February 24, 1994, the St. Lucie County. Planning and Zoning Commission : hearing on. the petition, after publishing notice at least t5. days prior .to the notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject, property, ,ended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereinafter tuest for a change in zoning from CO (Commercial, Office)' to PNRD (Planned ,/al Development) for the property described below. 'On March 22, 1994, this Board held a public hearing on' the petition, after notice of such-hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and not, g-by mail all )perty within 500 feet of the subject property. That hearing was 'continued to The proposed change in zoning is consistent .with the St. Lucie County ye Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie Development Code. SITE PLAN The petitioner is proposing a 4,876 square foot store at the southeast corner Blvd. and Airoso Blvd. to be known as Conrfie's Kountry Junction. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 for the prc w/th the fu conditions held a pub and mailec recommen, known as The Development Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary site plan posed project and found it to meet all technical requirements and to be consistent ture land use maps from the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the set forth in Section A of this resolution. On February 24, 1994, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission tic hearing of ~hich due public notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News to all property owners within 500 feet at least 15 days prior to the hearing, and ]ed to this Board that Preliminary Development Plan approval for the project ;onnie's Kountry Junction be granted. 8. This Board held a public hearing on March 22, 1994, of which due public notice was p_ublished in the Port St. Lucie News and .mailed notice was sent to all property owners within 500 feet. That hearing was continued to April 5, ~994. ' 9. -- The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, ~an__cl__stan. datd. s o~f. the St: L_uc~e_. County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County ,..omprener rove man, anct the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 10. property, t~ other matte 11. proposed p~ and screen/ 12. interfere w~ applicable d 13. 14. emergency a, The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent e character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or rs affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. .AH re~onable st..eps have been taken to minimi?e any adverse effect of the oject on me immediate.vicinity through building design, Site design, landsca in tg. P g The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to h the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with Strict regulations. The proposeff'project will be served by adequate public facilities ~nd services. The applicant has demonstrated that ware? supply, evacuation facilities, and mess are satisfactory tO provide adequate fire protection. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22- 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 NOW, TH Lucie Cot A. change in Developm~ B. and a than Developme below. C. the site pla Residential project pre1 received by l subject to tt 1. 2. EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the St. nty, Florida: CHANGE IN ZONING Preliminary' and Final Planned Non-Residential Development approval and a zoning from CO .(Commercial, Office) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential mt)/s granted for the property described as follows: N 1/2 of section 28 Township 36 South Range 4OEast, The West 10 feet of Lot 17 and all of lots 18, 19, and 20 of Block 50 of River Park Unit 5 according to the-plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 31 of the public records of St. Lucie County, FL. (Location: 204 SE Prima Vista Blvd., 206 SE Prima Vista Blvd., and 115 SE Airoso Blvd., Port Slx Lucie, FL) This Preliminary and Final Planned Non-Residential Development approval in zoning from CO (Commercial, Office) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential at) is granted subject to the site plan and conditions specified in Section C. Pursuant to Section 11..02.05 of the St. Lucie County land Development Code, n for the project known as Connie's Kountry Junction - A planned Non- Development, is hereby approved as shown on' the site plan drawings for the ~ared by Houston. Cuozzo Group, dated March 8, 1994, and date stamped he St. Lucie County CommUnity Development Administrator on March 8, 1994, e following conditions: All fighting f~'6ilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as-to p~event direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to-adjoining streets or properties. The sigm permitted for the preliminary and final PNRD shall be limited to the following: Freestanding Project Signs Primary'Street Frontage (Prima Vista Blvd.) - 1 sign, maximum 32 square feet, mammum 10 feet high. Other Major Sign Frontage (Airoso Blvd.) - 1 sign, max/mum 16 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 with Sectio~ site plan ap determined comply volta become null F. in Section B Developmen granted by tl~ Facade Signs A maximum of 150 square feet of facade signs shall be permitted. The permitted sign area may be divided to provide for facade signs facing Prima Vista Blvd. and Airoso Blvd. Allowance for Double Faced and Lighted Signs All signs may be double faced and directly or indirectly lighted. Setbacks for Signs All signs shall be located a minimum of ten feet from any right-of-way and five feet from any adjoining property line. Only those retail trade uses which are identified as permitted in 3.00.01 (Q)(2)(f), (CN Commercial, Neighborhood, St. Lucie County Land Development Code) shall be authorized within the area described in part C except that gasoline services shall not be permitted. GENERAL CONDITIONS This Final Planned Non-Residential Development approval shall expire on unless building permits are issued or an extension is granted in accordance 11.02.06.B.3, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The conditions set forth in Section B are an integral nonseverable part of the ?royal granted by this resolution. If any condition set forth in Section B is to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to ttarily with thai"~ondition, th~ site plan approval granted by this resolution shall and void. .A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Administrator. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was e Community Development Administrator on March 22, ~994. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 .Afl PAS ATTEST: DEPI 94-(ff) hf ~r motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Havert L. Fenn Vice-Chairman Denny Green Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Judy Culpepper Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner SED AND DULY ADOPTED This 5th Day of April 1994. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: rI'Y'CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY ROAD CR ST. DRIVE STA LUC1 MART~N PROJECT LOCATION SAVANNA CLUB BI_VD ROAD C( COUNTY NEY 2 1 VISTA -SOL_~DA DRIVE I , DRAINAGE DITCH t BL VI 21 22 2~ SOLAZ AVENUE '-- BONITA COi~RT L ilSP USE LLI I~A 'VISTA BLV 7 9 SOL IDA DRIVE -t DRAINAGE DITCH SOLAZ AVENUE BONITA' CO-DRT PUBLIC Mr. Hank an applica re-submitn [EARING CO~IE BISHOP t~-.~ 4~ ~E NO. ~-9~002 . o~es presented s~ co~ents. He stated that ~s. B~hop O~y subdued iond for a ch~ge ~ zo~g ~om CO 'to CN and that petition was ~am ~d ~ a PN~. Mr. Flores stated that staff has found that the proposed zoning district would be consistent with the e>isting and future zoning of land use designation in the area. The proposed PNRD zor~ ng district will allow the operatiOn of a store to sale citrus and other food goods in a locatio..a designated for commercial purposes by the comprehensive plan. Mr. Flores stated that, as presented, the proposed rezoning is not consistent with Section 7.06.03.D of the St. Luci e County Land Development .Code regarding loading zones. Mr. Flores stated that the petitioner is requesting a chanee in zonin to a River Gfllf Citrus food stor- T ..... · ._ - g PNRD to establish ... r u~. me stated that, ff approved with the recommended concnnons, ~he proposed zoning would allow the applicant to build a 4,876 square building fo.r ~eigh.,borho.od.co.,~.m~m~ e[cml uses..He stated that the'conditions recommended by staff address ligh rig, s~gnage, and fuel and ~ce dealers Staff-'-- .... - ~ecommenos mat any lighting on the subject 1 }'on st/ that th/s peri approval, Mr. Skidmo Mr. DaVid K, SIC code, rue Mr. Sattler m Mr. Mi'llcE re Chairman KIe staff reports Mr. Flores sta ma/led. Mr. Terpenin Mr. Michael I- and briefly dis roperty shah be directed off-site and that signs be consistent with the City. of sign. regulations for commercial uses. Mr. Flores stated that staff recommends tion be forwarded the Board of County Commission w/th a.recommendation of )ject to the above condition. e asked staff for the definition of ice dealers. ~qly replied that the reason that staff stated fuel or ice dealers, is. because in the 1 and ice are labeled together. This is not intended to preclude the sale of ice. ked Whether therebeen a response from Port St.'Lucie regarding thi.q petition. . plied no. in stated that Mr. Flores indicated that the square footage was 4,876, however, ad/cate that it is 4,960. -- ted that the applicant had changed the dimensions since the staff report was asked if there were a transparency of the site plan? ~uston provided a copy of the site plan. Staff and the commission reviewed :ussed the site plan. Mr. HOus~ last meeti~ issues that regard to 1 should, do. leave the i Mr. Miller used that ~ regUlations more restn Mr: Houst in this case, Chairman opposed to Mr. Houstc Mr. Skidmc Ms. Bishop bins for bag~ Chairman K of-this provi Mr, Lancaste that the peti~ Ms. Janyce R zoning.map petition. Mr. B.J. Daw zoning map st he feels that against this p( ~, ,,~, put togemer an application that addresses many of the were of concern. Mr. Houston briefly expla/ned the site plan. He stated that in he signage, he had used the Eckerd's sUbmittal as an example of what the PNRD and he feels that he has complied with that. He added, that he would prefer to ign square footage as is, and not use Port St. Lucie's Sign Code. stated that staff recommended the use of Port St. Lucie Sign Code because staff ts a condition in the Eckerd's PNRD. He stated that staff felt that those sign are less intrusive in residential areas because the Port St. Lucie Sign Code is ctive than the St. Lucie Coumy sign regulations. earl the specific sign-related conditions as they were stated in the Eckerd case. n stated that he would be satisfied if those specific citations would be included rather than having a broad reference to the Port St. Lucie sign regulations. 2lein asked what was the justification for putting the service area Where it is as along side the building? stated that primarily it was a health safety and welfare issue. re asked how w/Il the fruit be delivered? stated that it will be coming in gift boxes and some will come/n hand-liftable ling. :ion.ein asked Mr. 1-amcaster if he have any thoughts on the flexibility with regards r stated that he has reviewed the code proxSsions, and Section 7.02.03 provides ion has to conform with loading requirements. oy appeared b~fore the Commission. She stated tha~'she resides ~[ #2 on the hown on the overhead projector, and she and her husband are in favor of the appeared before the Commission. He stated that he resides at #1 on the ~own on the overhead projector. He expressed several concerns, including that :histition. is the most dangerous corner in Port St. Lucie, therefore, he is 100% 4 Ms. Ceeil~ who is go: on how it Mr. Thorr #9 on the because Pl traffic on Mr. Geor~ the zoning in 1980 Ms. 'Kathz, against thi~ Hearing m the public' Mr. Houstt feels that ti to move foJ prefer to'dr Mr. Miller condition, s: Mr. Terpezr it is not a n it will be a After consj comments, Land Devel, recommend application i Residential a Kirby appeared before the Commission. She stated that she would like to know ng to enforce the conditiOns, because she has read this petition very thoroughly is gOing affect her life and she will see that they are enforced. as W. Castle, Sr. appeared before the Commission. He stated that he resides at zoning map shown on the overhead projector,, and he is against this petition ~rt St. Lucie is still developing, Prima Vista Blvd is still under construction and the is not normal just yet. e Stahura appeared before the Comm/ssion. He stated that he resides at #1 on map shown on the overhead projector. He stated that he bought his property 1 he has never gone to.a convenience store; therefore, he is against this petition. a Wineland appeared before the Commission. She. stated that she is strictly petition because the residents do not need a fruit stand, they have grocery stores. other comments in favor or in opposition to the petition, Chairman Klein closed ~ortion of the hearing. a stated that he.is not present to ask for a land use change, just a rezonlng. He te proposed petition is good for.the neighborhood. He stated that he is willing ~vard tO staff's recommendation regarding the service area; however,' they would the one that is shown on the plan. ated that staff will.propose to the Board of County Commission an additional ating that the Petitioner must meet.the cod~ and move the loading zone. ng suggested.that since the Board is having a concern about meeting code, and ~quired circulati°n area, the petitioner can post a no throUgh traffic sign, then vading zone area only. lering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing,. including staff nd the Standards of Review as set_forth in Section 1L06.03, St. L_ucie County )pm~nt Code, 'lgJr. Satfler m~ved that the Planning ~md Zoning Commission Ihat the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the -Connie Bishop, for a change in zoning from CO. to. PNRD (Planned Non- )evelopment) with the following conditions: Only. those retail trade uses which are identified as permitted in Section 3.00.01 (Q)(2)(f), (CN Commercial, Neighborhood, St. Lucie County Land Development Code) shall be authorized, except that gasoline services shall not be permitted. McCain, Mt Walker, Mr. Chairman g Commissiom All lighting facilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or properties. Signs permitted for the preliminary and final PNRD shall be. limited to the following: Freestanding Project Signs Prin~. ary Street Frontage (Prima Vista Blvd.) - I sign, maximum 32 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. Other.Major Sign Frontage (Airoso Blvd.) - 1 sign, maximum 16 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. Facade Signs A maximum of 150 square feet of facade signs shall be permitted. The permitted sign area may be divided to provide for facade signs facing Prima Vista Blvd. and Airoso Blvd. 'Allowance for Double Faced and Lighted Signs All signs may be double faced and directly or indirectly lighted. Setbacks for Signs All signs shall be located a minimum of ten feet from any right-of-way and five feet from any adjoining property line. seconded the motion, and upon roll call, Mr. Terpening, Mr. Carman, Mr. Sattler and Chairman Klein voted .in favor of the motion. Mr. Bigge, Mr. Skidmore, and Ms. C~labrese voted against the motion. lein ~stated 'th~' this petitiori world be forwarded to the Board'' of County :rs with a recommendation of approval. PNRD (PI~ for the foll AGENDA . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, APRIL 5, 1994 9:00 A.M. nnie Bishop, for a change in zoning from CO (Commercial, Office) to trmed Non-Residential Development) for the purpose of building a general store. ~w/ng property: N ther, Cot[ ff it Pleas electronicall Coun~ Con he will need that a verbal evidence up~ proceeding, proceeding v a hearing up also be cons Prior owners on & newspaper of 2 of Section-28 Township 36 South Range 40 East, The West 10 feet- of Lot 17 all of Lots 18, 19, and 20 of Block 50 of River Park Unit 5 according to.the.plat mf as recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 31 of the public records of St. LUcie t-ion: 204 SE Prima Vista Blvd., 206 SE Prima Vista Blvd., & 115 SE Airoso Blvd., Port St. Lucie, FL >ecomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time~ e note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are r recorded, ff'a person decides, to appeal, any.decision made by the Board of missioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, a record of the proceedings, and that, for'such purpose, he may need to ensure im record of the proceedings is made, which record inClUdes the testimony and m which the appeal is to be. bas6d. Upon the request of any party to the hadividuals testifying during a hearing will be-sworn in. Any party to the qll be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during m request. Written comments received in advance of the public.hearing will Jered. :o this public hearing, . notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property ~arch 7, 1994. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News, a · general circulation in St. Lucie County, on March 2, 1994. FILE NO. RZ-94-002 t News e ar nd The Port St. Luci'ae NeWS (an edit :on of The Stuart News) STATE OF FLOI: JDA COUNTY OF MARTIN: COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE: PRITCHARDBef°re the mdersigned authority appeared KfiTHLEEH N. - -' -of The Stuart Ne;~, and The Port St. Lueie Ne~, _rff daily.new~paper Published at Stuart in M'artin ~ounty, Fi~rida' that the attache copy of advertisement, being in the matter of in the ~ Court, Was Published in The Stuart Ne~ and 'Fhe Port St; Lueie News in the issues of er says that the said The Stuart Nm;~ and The - vs is a ne;~paper published at Stuart, in said orida with offices and Paid circulation in orion, and rs mty, Florida and distributed in Martin County, cie ~unty, Florida, for a period of one year first pub'lieation of the attached copy of affiant further says that he/she has neither any pers0n~'firm or.corporatiOn any discount, ~ or refund'for the purpose of securing this - ... ~ublieatiOn in the said nexx~spaper. The Stuart ered as second class matter at the post offie~ ',ounty, Florida, and~Ft. Pierce; St. Lueie J has been for a period of one year next publication of the attached copy of SWorn to and subscrib~d before me this ~~ (~al) ' ~oCary Public~ Affiant furtl' port St. Lucie Ne, Martin County, Fl Martin County, Fl the said newspape in said Martin Cot Florida and St. I.u next preceding th'~ advertisement; paid nor promised rebate; eOmmissio advertisement for Nex,X's has been ent, in Stuart, Martin County, Florida a~ preeedin~ the first advert isemen t. ST. LUOE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY CO_MMISSlONERS · PUBLIC HFARIi(JG'AGENDA- TO WHOM IT.'~ CO~ICEI~N: ~ St2 tucie Count/had and Z~ing ~mis~ consi~ C~ssJ~ f~ fi.~a~e: in z~ Eom CO (~o~ciaL ~) .StK2, tOr 6q - ~ ..... :~ 1050 T~pnR~d.P~St -4).P~ ~ Z~i~ Come.ion d~l U~ ~mit .. i~ d~ ~o~: SE~ION 34, TOWNsHIp 35. ~NGE ~0. ~p ~ P~iti~a of Richard Ofdfield. has ~tSion~ ~ Planning O~ Zonln~ Commls;ion ~om CO {Commerclo( ~/ce) ~ AR-1 [Agri~u~uro[ Resi- dent;ag - t · LEGAl~ Parcel 1: T~e North 287 ~ o~ A~venue and Second Oleander Porcel 2: Being a portion Hat thereof lic R~ord ida and this fi~lady d~i~ Co~e ~ a~d 12i.30 feet toa 84°: 16.0Zfeet ~o _a .00°16'49- :.~ ;89?40'31' :6 Eas~ in St./ Parcd 4: ~-" ~inning at a ~im 165 et S~ a~ 530 ~t Ea~ ~ sai~ ~ of O1~ Av~-a~ S~t; ~nce N~ ~ 5 · e~e East 530 f~, ~e~ e S~ 165 f~t, ~ence West 5: ~f to · e b~inning. All in ~ion 3, Township 36 So~. Ran 40 East in St. Lude Co~. Flor Parcel 5: Potions of the NoHhwest~ of the So.west ~4 of Sedian ~ and the N~heast ~ of the S~th~est ~ of ~ion 4, all lying in Ta~nship 36 So~, Range 40 Eas~, lying in St_ Lucle Count, FJ~ida, des~r~ as ~allows: C~e~ ,~e ~er~r'of Olean- J CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8738~40' cie A~ -~"~k Second S~tJ ~D ~OSE ~DIUS POINT ~e 24~d~ of M~, 1894 in ~eJ FROM SAID INTERSECTJ~; r~d~ in PI~ B~k ~ ~ag~ ~00: WE~Ly ALONG THE AR~F ~ ~ PU~i~ R~ds:0f St.'L~ie .~D~CUR~ A DISTAN~ OF ~ ~ N~- 89'34~~ ~ID NO~ UNE, A DIST~ OF'289.01 F~ TO THE NgR~ ~, a d~ta~ ~ 279.02 f~; ~T~ C~NER ~ mn S 0~09'5~ W ~i~ JTtON'22~ THENCE S~¢H ~.of31~89f~;~e~S ;894~" ~T ALONG S~ 8~45'55" W a di~ ~ I ~7 : NOR~ LIN~ A DIST~ OF .108.~ ~ ~ ~ East (~t ~y CONTAINING 15.5 ACRES ~E ~ O~nd~ A~- ~ence ~n N . ~OUTH N~ UN~.OF SMD. SE~N 2~ D~TAN~ O~ 2~.2~ : TO ~E NORTH ~AR~R~R- CONTUNU~ .. ~LONg- ?THE' . NORTH LINE OF SAID S~ION' .22, A DISTANCE OF ~ TO THE'POINT OF BEGI~ NING; THENCE SOUTH OF 252.23 FEET; THEN~ 29~7 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8z~'~~ WEST, ~ DISTA~C~ 6723'40' WEST, A DISTilL OF ~0.35 FEET; THENCE S~H 7B~7'03' ~ST, A D~STA~CE OF ~_99 [~ET TO A POINT~F NON RADIAL INTeRSECtION W~H A CIRCU~R CURVE CA¥~ TO TH~ 5OUTHWEST~v_ lNG A RADIUS OF 566_86 F~T[ A TO: FROM: D3~TE: SUBJECT: LOCATIOb EXI~G PROPOSE[ LAND USE PARCEL SI PROPOSED SURROUI'~ SURROUNI FIRF_JEMS p UTILITY SE] PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 1/27/94 File Number RZ-94-002 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Director~'b~/~ January 19, 1994 Application of Connie E. Bishop, for a Change in Zoning from CO (Commercial, Office) to CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) ZONING: ~ ZONING: DESIGNATION: ZE: USE: ,lNG ZONINg..- lNG LAND IOTECTION: tVICE: Southeast corner of the intersection of West Prima Vista Boulevard and Airoso Boulevard. CO (Commercial, Office) CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) COM (Commercial). 0.72 acres River Gulf Citrus Food Store CO (Commercial, Office) on afl three opposing comers and RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) on the rest of the surrounding a~ea. General use surrounding the property is residential. Several public uses such as parks, schools, and churches are located to the west of the site. Station #3, (River Park) is located approximately 0.2 mile to the west. Water and sewer service is provided by St. Lucie County Utilities. January Page 2: TRANSPi RIGHT-C ADEQUA SCHEDU. IMPROV TYPE OF CONCURI DOCUME In rev. Commissior 994 Petition: Connie E. Bishop File No: RZ-94-002 tRTATION IMPACTS: F-WAY ,ED ,~MENTS: ~NCY qT REQUIRED: .The existing fight-of-way for West Prima Vista Boulevard ~s one- hundred (100) feet. The existing right-of-~way for Airoso Avenue is one-hundred (~00) feet. Additional right-of-way is not required as a.result of this request. Widening of West Prima Vista Boulevard from Airoso Boulevard to Bayshore Boulevard in 1997/98 (MPO-028). Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS. SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE wing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning shall consider and make the following' determinations: Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lueie County Land. Development Cede;, The proposed zoning district is consistent, with.the St. Lucie County Land Development"Code and the Land Use Category/Zoning District Matrix set forth in Section 1L09.02 of that Code as Figure I. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with'all, elements of the St. Lueie County Comprehensive Plan; The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed .amendment .would be consistent with all elements of St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The following Goals, Objectives and Policies apply to this request: January Page 3 1994 Petition: Connie E. B/shop File No: RZ-94-002 Future Land Objective 1.1.4: Requires compat~ility with the ex/sting and proposed land area. uses in the Furore Land Use Policy 1.1.5.1: The subject property is located within the Planned Urban Service Area as required by this policy. Future Land Use PoliCY 1.1.7.2: CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) zoning is consistent with the land nse~zoning compatibility chart as identified within this element. Future Laud Use Policy 1.1,8.6: Encourages the development of commercials nodes consistent with the Future Land Use Map. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed zoning district would be consistent with the existing and future zoning and land use designations in the area. The proposed CN zoning district would allow the operation of a store to sell citrus and other food goods in a location designated for commercial purposes by the Comprehensive Plan. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; There have been changed conditions for which this amendment is requested. TWO events have occurred that require an amendment: 1) The recently completed vd-dening of Wes~ Prima Vista Boulevard from US 1 to~Airoso Blvd and 2) The planned widening of West Prima Vista in 1997/98 betWeen Airoso Blvd and Bayshore Blvd. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; January Page 4 e The (Commercia The bnsines Vista Blvd an applicant beli highest and b would allow Neighborhoo( 1994 Petition: Connie E. Bishop File No: RZ-94-002 The subject property is located at the intersection of two minor Arterials -- Airoso Blvd and Prima Vista Blvd. The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. Whether and. the extent .to which the proposed amendment would result in signifiCant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the naturalenvironment. Any future development on this site will be required to comply with all federal, state, and local environmental, regulations.. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logiCal development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; The proposed zoning designation would result in an orderly and logical development pattern. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment is .consistent .with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent_ of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. etifioner, Co~lie E. Bisho~)i is requesting a change in zoning from CO Office) to CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) in-order to establish a food store. ~v~.~odsboeBll~.at~he°~rteh;,,s.°~u_th_e~t- CO, rn, er of the int.e_rse.ction of West Prima · ,,~ pxuvmus~y oeen rezoned from RS-4 to CO. The ~ves that rezoning from CO to CN would allow the use of the property for its ~st use as a River Gulf Citrus food store. If approved, the proposed zomg khe applicant to build a 5400 square foot building for CN (Commercial, D uses rather than the CO (Commercial, Office) uses currently permitted. January Page 5 In in the area within the concerned would allo, Protection event a per in order to the existing set forth in conflict witl~ Staff reco~ with a reco If yc Attachment /If cc: Count, Press/t App~ic File 1994 Petition: Connie E. Bishop File No: RZ-94-002 :viewing this petition, County staff expressed concern about wellfield protection of the intersection of Airoso/Prima Vista Blvd. The subject property is located one-thousand (1000) foot radius of the wellfield protection zone. Staff is that a change in zoning to the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) zoning district v the installation of gas pumps on site. According to the Interim Wellfield Ordinance, gas pumps would not be permitted. Staff wants to note that in the nanent ordinance is passed, it should stipulate a one-thousand (1000) foot radius )rohibit said gas pumps in the future. ty staff has determined that the proposed zoning designation is compatible with and proposed uses in the area. This petition meets the standards of review as Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in the goals, objectives and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. mends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commi.qsioners amendation of approval. have any questions on this matter, please contact this office. Attorney ablic ,nt HOUSTON CUOZZO GIlt 49 FLAGLER AVEi STUART FL 34994 2/139/RIVER PARK-8 JOHN J & FLORA M B] 106 NW AIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 3~ 2/72/RIVER PARK 9B JOSEPH J &MINNIE O 108 NE SOLIDADR PORT ST LUCIEFL 34 5/72/RIVER PARK 9B ~,FROY G & ISABRr,~,E 414, ROBAIX) OOURT STUART FL 34996 8/72/RIVER PARK 9B 156 NE SOL/J)A DR I~ORT ST LUCIE FL 349 1/55 & 1/56-RIVER PK CYNTHIA GA NGELOS ~BAUER& STEVEN 1290 NWLAKE~IDETR STUART FL 34994 ,UP UITE 3-B ~EISSLRR ~983 ~OYSKI )83 A CONNIE E. BISHOP 7684 WYLDWOOD WAY PORT ST LUCIE FL 34986 3/139/RIVER PARK-8 ANGELINA PAIAZZOTTO 110 NWAIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 3/72/RIVER PARK 9B DORCnmlYMGOODALE 116 NE SOLIDA DR PORTSTLUCIEFL34983 6/72/RIVER PARK 9B DORIS A & PAMErA J CROSBY 140NESOLIDADR PORT ST ~ FL34983 9/72/RIVERPARK9B TftOMAS W JR & SHAI~ G CASTi~ ~ W SR & AGNES A CASTLE 164 NE SOLIDA DR -~'PORT ST LUCRE FL 34983 2/56/RIVER PARK 6 RENE B SR & JANYCE L ROY 190 SW AIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 1/i39/RIVER PARK - 8 GEORGE S & IRENE J STAHURA 102 NWAtROSOBLVD PORT STLUCIE FL34983 1/72/RIVER PARK-9B .BERKLEY J & L~ L DAVIS 102NESOLIDA CIRCLE PORT'ST LUCIE FL 34983 4/72/RIVER PARK 9B CARL JCIfITE 124NESOLIDA DR PORT STLUCIE FL 34983 7/72/RIVER PARK 9B ALBERT OWRRNER ELIZABETfl'ANNWERNER 148NESOLIDADR PORT ST LUCIE FL34983 10/72/RIVER PARK 9B PETER T & SUSAN F WITTEMANN 76 .EASTWICKDR WILLIAMS~_f~NY14221 3/56/RIVER PARK 6 CLAIR A & FRANCISA F RAMSDE - MARIA I FERRER 210 N~ AIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 4/56/RIVER PARK 6 PATRICK L TIGHE JR Box 65 ' ~VERLy PA 18471 5./56/RIX,~_i~ PAPJK 6 DORIS B AHEAP~N 250 b1~ AIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 6/56/RIVER PARK 6 MICHAEL V FELICI 270 SW AI~DSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983- 7/56/RIVER PARK RAYMOND F STEELE 290 SW AIROSO AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 10/56/RIVER PARK SILVIO & OFFELIA 360 SW AIROSO AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 3 -31/43/RIVER PARK 5 FRANK&ANNAMEIA~ t47NWPR//vlAVISTA PORT STLUCIE FL3~ 35/43/RIVERPARK 5 JOSEPH D &MARIA~ 71MLACKEYAVE 38/43/RIVER PARK 5 HYLAND F & RUT~- 1118 S COUNTRY CLUB DEMING NM 88030 10&ll/50/RIVER PARK5 FRED A & ~ATHRYN WIN~ 134 W PR/MA VISTA BLV PORT ST LUCIE FL 3491 13&14/50/RIVER PARK5 E E & LOLA E CAREW 156 W PRIMA VISTA BLV PORT ST LUCIE FL 3498 34983 LVAREZ ~983 ~LVD .983 .1050 8/56/RIVER PARK 6 ROBERT j &CAROLBARBER 300 'SWAIROSOAVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 29~43~RIVER PARK 5 CURTIS W & SUSAN NR~ P.O. BOX 2111 DARIEN CT 06820 32/43/RIVERPARK5 JAMES & ~ ~E 180 NW PR/MA VISTA BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 36/43/RIVER PARK5 GIGI A SIM00X 201 W ~.VIST~ BLVD PORT ST I/K/IE FL 34983 8&9/50/RIVER PARK 5 JEWELL W ~ .... 1104 CI/IB DR' ' FT. PIERCE FL 34982 ll&12/50/RIVER PARK5 ROy DM URPHy 140 W PRIMA VISTA BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 14&15/50/RIVER PARK5 HELEN ~-JWNER - 168 W PRI~tA VISTA BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 9/56/RIVER PARK 6 CI3kPA D CHAPMAN 330 SW AIRY)SO AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 30/43/RI~R PARK 5 CHARLES &MARY BUTLER 1618 AVE Q FT- PIERCE FL 34950 33&34/43/RIVER PK 5 JOHN J SALERNO 167 W PRIMA VISTA BLVD PORT STLUCIEFL 34983 37/43/RIVER PARK 5 JOHN JR & B ROTI~ DEVOS 676 SE D~C4kN DR PORT .ST LUCIErFL 34983 JOSEPH F JR & FAYE A SULLI~ 108 E MAIN STREET _ = ELVERSON PA 19520 12&13/50/RIVER PARK5 PAT & CARMELA LUC/ANI 389COIJgORNESTREET BRANTFORD, ONTARIO CANADA 15&16/50/RIL~R PARK5 ~{ARLES D & CECILIA G KIRBY 174 W PRIMA VISTA BLVD PORT ST LUCLE FI, 34983 t6&17/50/RIVER PA LK5 VIRGIE f L HARRISON 182 W PRIMA VISTA BLVD PORT S~E LUCIE FL ~,4983 A - 20/50/RIVER p 5 CONNIE E BISHOP P.O. 8OX 8928 PORT ST I;JCIE FL 3 1985 23/50/RIVER PARK 5 JACK J & LAURIE M PRIVATEER 1751 COPEN~IAVER RO~ D FT. PIERCE FL 3494! 26/50/RIVER PARK 5 3347 SOUTH US #1 FT. PIERCE FL 34982 29/50/RIVER PARK 5 Fm~K & KATaLEEN N ~ ~OWSK~ 181 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 349 3 32/50/RIVER PARK 5 FRANK C & HELEN K RE] ~-CKE 155 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34982 35/50/~IVER PARK 5 RALPH ~ & FLORF~NCE S CJ RE 108 EAST ~AIN S/~REET ELVERSON PA 19520 17&iS/50/RIVER PARK5 C F SHAWVER :~ GENEVIEVE L JACKSON 9650 S. A1A - #1105 gENSEN BEACH FL 34957 19/50/RIVE[{ PARK 5 GENEVIEVE L JACKSON (IXNNIE BISHOp 2500 SE MIDPORTRD, STE 4404 PORT STLUCIE FL 34952 21/50/RIVER PARK 5 LAWRENCE R WOODS 520 HEDGE~ PLACE WINSTON SA~NC 27104 22/50/RIVER PARK 5 DAVID &MARIA PALLANTE 205 SE AIROSO BLVD PORT STLUClE FL 34983 24/50/RIVER PARK 5 LUCIANO C D'ANGELO ANGELINE L D'A/~ 225 SW AIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 25/50/RIVER P~/LK 5 MkrRONJ &FLC~ENCE L JANISC~ 201 SE BONITA(I)URT PORT STLUCIEFL34983 27/50/RIVERPARK$ DANIEL J NtNESTINE 191 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCRE FL 34983 FRANK W & ELIZABETH K MALCO! 189 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 30/50~ PARK 5 MARY H KEr.LS 173 SE SOLAZ AVE --PORT ST LUCIE FL-34983 31/50/RIVER PARK5 IDA NELLTOLLEFSEN 167 SE SOIAZAVE PORT STLUCIE FL34983. 33/50/RYVER PARK 5 S~ELIA C & JOHN ~ SMITH 6452 OS~AGE STREET ALLEN PARK MI 48101 34/50/RIVER-PARK 5 ROSE OBERMUELLER 20 HOLLYWOOD AVE CLIFTON NJ 07014 6/51/R~VER PARK 5 ANNE T DOUCUFT 140 PORT ST LUCIE ~L 34983 7/51/RIVER PARK 5 SEYMOUR & RII~ LEAf[NE 2400 S OCEAN DR - #3634 FT. PIERCE FL 34949 8/5t/RIVER PARK 5 HENRy G HEAD (EST~ C/O DONALD A GABS 4223 NORTHFIELD HOUSTON TX 77092 ll/51/RIVER PARK STACY M & STEPHEN. PATRICIA j OVERTON 325 22ND AVE VERO BEACH FL 32961 14/51/RIVERPARK5 DEBRAL YORK 181 SE BONITA-OOUR~ PORT STI33CIE FL 34 17/51/RIVERPARK 5 PAUL ONUFRYK 161 'SW BONITA COURT POR~ ST LUCIE FL 34'. 8/52/R~ PARK 5 ~60 SW BONITA OOURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 3498. ll/52/RtVER PARK 5 iMILES j.& ~qA L HECK 180 SWBONITa OOURT ~ ~ LUCIE ~ 34983 AgN, SR OVamTON ~83 ~ISON 9/51/RIVER PARK 5 S~ & LORI KING 164 SW SOLAZ AVE PORT ST. LUCIE FL 34983 12/51/RIVER PARK 5 MARLENE j FRIGO 633 EAST MAIN STREE~ TORRINGTON CT 06790 15/51/RIVER PARK 5 BRIAN F & ~LENS HERRICK 175SWBONITA COURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 18/51/RIVER PARK 5 LE]IA GIBBS SASLER 151 SE BfIWlTA OOORT PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 9/52/RIVER PARK5 JANET E~ 164SWBONITAOQDRT PORTSTLUC~E FL.34983 12/52/RIVER PARK 5 ALFRED EUGENE& ETHEL E BOHL 190SWBONITA OOURT PORT ST LUCtE FL 34983 10/51/RIVER PARK 5 RICHARD F & CAROL M BRISSE% 3370 GULF CFMEXICODR LONGBOAT KEY FL34228 13/51/RIVER PARK5 ALLEN W & DONNA S PATRIcg 191 BONITA OOURT PORT ST LUCIE FL34952 16/51/RIVERPARK 5 BRADLEY S STOLDT 117 CARVER SO k%CONIA MN 55387 7/52/RIVER PARK5 JOSEPHINE KURPICKi 150SW'BONITACOURT PORT STLUCIEFL34983 10/52/~ PARK 5 JAMES L PRESTON, II PORT STLUCIE FL34983 t3/52/RIVER PARK 5 · NICHOLAS PAUL 13 BIXRDMS~ DRIVE BURLING/~N NJ 08016 t5/52/Rtl,q~R PARK 5 J~&Y R GOOD¥~AR P.O. DOX 7123 DORT ST LUCIE ~L 34985 I6/52/RIVER PARK 5 5'6~S HELEN E 171 EL $I~O COURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 17/52/RIVER PARK 5 RONALDA~& SHARO~ 791 SWSOLAZAVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 2/57/RIVER PARK 6 MICHAEL E MOON, SR 335 SE AIROSO AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 3~ PUMP STATION ST. LUCIE COUNTY UT] 25O NW COUNTRy CLUB PORT ST LUCIE FL 34~ #7 THOMas A GONZALEg KATSRYN B~SILE 351 SW RAVENS~0OD L~ PORT ST LUCIE FL 3491 I RATHAy {4983 !983 7LITIES DR 86 18/52/RIVER PARK 5 PATRICIAL &DONALDc DUNCAN 1505 NW PINELAKE DR STUART FL34994 ll/57/RIVER PARK 6 RONALO R & BRENDA j HOR~IER 301 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 PROPERTY ACQUISITiON DIV ADMINBLDGANNEX 2300VIRGINLAAVE PIERCE-FL 34982 #3 ATLANTIC Gtr~F CO~VON~TIES A%~N: IAND ~ DEpt. 2601 S BAYMHORE DR MIAMI. FL 33133 #4 CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE 121 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVO -'PORT ST LUCIE FL-34984 1/57/RIVER PAR~ 6 hrILLIS B & PHYLliS V MALL 305 SE AIROSO AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 12/57/RIVER pAR}( 6 ROBERT j & GAYLE McNIECE 311 SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 #1 ST- LUCIE ASSOC, INC 451 SW RAVENSWOOD LANE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 #6 ST LUCIE OD-FT PIERCE FIRE P.O. BOX 3030 FT. PIERCE FL 34948 #2 ST. LUCIE 'COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVE -~ FT. PIERCE, FL. 34982 HOUSTON CUOZZO (~ 49 FLAGLER AVE., STUART FL 34994 2/139/RIVER PARK- JOHN J & FLDRA M 106 NW AIROSO BLV PORT ST LUCIE FL 2/72/RIVER PARK 9£ JOSEPH J & MINNIE ~ 108 NE SOLIDA DR PORT ST LUCIE FL 3, 5/72/RIVER PARK 9B LERO¥ G & ISABELLE 414 ROBALO COURT STUART FL 34996 8/72/RIVER PARK 9B RUTH T KRETSCH 156 NE SOLIDA DR PORT ST LUCIE FL 349 1/55 & 1/56-R/VER PR CYNTHIA G ANGELOS ED~ BAUER & STEVEN 1290 NW LAKESIDE TR STUART FL 34994 4~56~RIVER pARK 6 PATRICK ~BOX 65 L TIGHE, JR SUITE 3-B ~LEISSI~ER ) 14983 ) ' BOYSKI ~983 BARONE A CONNIE E. BISHOp 7684 WYLDWOOD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34986 3/139?RIVER PARK-8 ANGELINA PALAZ~ 110 NW AIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 3~72~RIVER PARK 9B DOROTHY M GOODALE 116 NE SOLIDA DR PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 6/72/RI~ PARK 9B DORIS A & pAjv/ELAJCROSBY 140 NE SOLIDADR PORT STLUCIEFL34983 9/72/RIVER PARK 9B THOMAS W JR & SHAWN G CASTLE THOMAS W SIR & AGNES A CASTLE 164 NE SOLIDA DR PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 2/56/RIVER PARK 6 RENE B SR & JANYCE L ROY 190 SW AIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 5/56/RI%q~R PARK 6 DORIS 250 NW AIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 1/139/RIVER PARK - 8 GEORGE S & IRENE J STAHUtLA 102 NWAIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 t/72/RIVER PARK-9B BERKLEYJ & i3~L DAVIS 102 NE SOLIDA CIRCLE ~- PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 4/72/RtVERPARK 9B CARL J CHITE 124 NE SOLIDA DR PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 7/72/RIVER PARK 9B ALBERT O WERNER ELIZABETH ANNWERNER 148 NE SOLIDADR PORT STLUCIEFL34983 10/72/RIVER pARK 9B PETER T & SUSAN FWITTEMAblM 76~ASTWICK DR WILLIAMSVILLENY 14221 3/56/RIVER PARI< 6 CLAIR A & FRANCISA F RAMSDE MARIA I FERRER 210 NWAIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 6/56/RIVER PARI{ 6 MICHAEL V FELICI 270 SWAIROSO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 7/56/RIVERPARK RAYMOND F STEELE 290 SW AIROSO AVt PORT ST LUCIE FL 10/56/RIVER PARK SILVIO & OFFELIA 360 SWAIROSOAVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 31/43/RIVERPARK 5 FRANK &ANNAMELA~ 147NWPRIFIAVISTA IKXRT ST LUCIEFL 3~ 35/43/RIVER PARK 5 JOSEPH D & MARIA DF, 71 ~ACKEY AVE PORT ' k~INGTON NY 38/43/RIVERPARK 5 HY~ F & RUTH S K] 1118 S ODUNTRY CLUB DEMING NM 88030 10&ll/50/RIVER PARK5 FRED A & KATHRYNWIN~ 134 W PR IMAVISTA BL~ PORT ST LUCIE FL 349~ 13&14/50/RIVER PARK5 E E & LOLA E CAREW ~56 W PRIMA VISTA BLV PORT ST LUCIE FL 3498 14983 5VAREZ ',4983 1983 ,L~-VECCHIA 1050 8/56/RIVER PARK 6 ROBERT j &CAROLBARBER 300 SWAIROSOAVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 29/43/RIVER PARK 5 CURTIS W & SUSAN NRALSTON P.O. BOX 2111 DARIEN CT 06820 32/43/RIVER PARK 5 JAMES & GAILCARANNANTE 180 NWPR//vlAViSTA BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 36~43/RIVER PARK 5 GIGI A S~X 201 W PRIMA VISTA~ PORT STLUCIE FL 34983 8&9/50/RIVER PARK 5 JEWELLW TAYLOR ll04CLUBDR FT. PIERCE FL 34982 lt&12Z50/RIVER PARK5 ROy DM URPHY 140 W PRIMA VISTA BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 t4L15/50/RIVER PARK5 HELENMENNER 168 W PRIMA VISTA BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 9/56/RIVER PARK 6 CLARA D CHAPMAN 330 SW AIROSO AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 30~43~RIVER PARK 5 CHARLES&~Ry BUTLER 1618 AVE Q FT. PIERCE FL 34950 33&34/43/R/VER PK 5 JOHN J SALERBK) 167 W PR/MA VISTA BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 37/43/RIVERPARK 5 JOHN JR& B RUTH DEVOS 676 SE D~?~NDR PORT ST LUCIE FL34983 9&i0/50/RrVER PARK 5 JOSEPH F JR & FAYE A SULLi~7 108 E MAIN STREET ELVERSON PA 19520 12&13/50/RIVER PARK5 PAT & CARMELA<LUCIANi 389OOLBORNE STREET ~POP~D, ONTARIO 15&16/50/RI~v~ER PARK5 CHARLES D & CECILIA G KIRBY 174 W PRIMA VISTA BLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL~4983 16&17/50/RIVER P ~RK5 VIRGIE L HARRISO~ 182 W PRIMA VIST7 PORT ST LUCIE FL A - 20/50/RIVER pi CONNIE E BISHOP P.O. BOX 8928 PORT ST LUCIE FL [ 23/50/RIVER PARK JACK J & LAURIE M 1751 COPENHAVERRC FT. PIERCE FL 3494. 26/50/RIVIi~PARK 5 RAYMOND VANMEERTEN MIKE HAS~ 3347 SOUTH US #1 FT. PIERCE FL 34982 29/50/RIVER PARK 5 FRANK & KATHLEEN N ] 181 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 349 32/50/RIVER PAR[ 5 FRANKc& HELEN KRE i55 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 3498: BLVD 34983 :¸5 35/50/RIVER PARK 5 RALPH M & FLORENCE S C ~E t08 EAST MAtNSTREET ELVERSON PA 19520 4985 ~IVATEER RKOWSKI ~3 qECKE 17&18/50/RIVER PARK5 C F SHAWVER GENEVIEVE L JACKSON 9650 S. A1A - #1105 JENSEN BEACH FL 34957 21~50~RIVER PARK 5 IAWRENCERWOODS 520HEDGEWE~D PLACE WINSTON SALEM NC 27104 24/50/RIVER PARK 5 LUC/ANO C D'ANGELO ANGELINEL D'ANGELO 225 SWAIROSOBLVD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 27/50/RIVERPARK 5 DANIEL j NINESTINE 191 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 30/50/RIVER PARK 5 MARy H KELLS 173 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT STLUCIE FL 34983 33/50/R'IVER PARK 5 SHELIA C & JOHN H SMITH 6452 OS~ STREET ALLEN PARK MI 48101 6/51/R1XrER PARK 5 AN~ T DOUCETT 140 SW SOLAZAVE PORT ST LUCiE FL 34983 .19/50/RIVER PARK 5 GENEVIEVE L JACKSON CONNIE BISHOP 2500 SE MIDPORT RD, STE 440~ PORT STLUCIE FL 34952 22/50/RIVER PAR~ 5 DAVID &MARIAPALLANTE 205 SE AIROSO BLVD PORT STLUCIE FL 34983 25/50/RIVER PARK 5 MYRON J & FLORENCE L JANISC} 201 SEBONITA COURT PORT STLUCIE FL 34983 28/50/RIVER PARK5 FRANK W & ELIZABETH K MALCOI 189 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 31~50~RIVER PARK 5 IDA NELLTOLLEFSEN 167 SE SOLAZAVE PORTSTLUCIE FL 34983 34/50/RIVER PARK 5 ROSE OBERMUELLER 20 HOLLYWOOD AVE CLIFTON NJ 07014 7/51/RIVER PARK 5 SEYSDUR& RITA LEVINE 2400 S OCEAN DR - #3634 FT. PIERCE FL 34949 8/5i/RIVER PARK HENRy G HEAD (ES~ C/ODONALDAGAB! 4223 NORTHFIELD HOUSTON TX 77092 ll/51/RIVER PARK STACY bi & STEPHEN PATRICIA j OVERTO] 325 22ND AVE VERO BF. ACH FL 329t 14/51/RIVER PARK DEBRAL YORK 181 SE BONITA CO~ PORT STLUCIE FL 3 17/5t/RIVER PARK 5 PAULONUFRYK 161 SWBONITA COUR~ PORT STLUCIE FL 3z 8~52~RIVER PARK 5 Im~NARDF & HELEN C~ 160SWBONITAOOURT PORT ST LUCIEFL 34~ ll/52/RIVER PARK 5 MILES J & S~kRA L HECi 180 SWBONITA OOURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 349 14/52/RtVERPARK 5 W F & BRENDA K JONES 181 SW EL SITO OOURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 3498 ?ATE) DRNf SR A OVERTON 3983 t83 LLISON ~83 ~3 9/51/RIVER PARK 5 SHERMAN & LORI KING 164 SW SOIAZ AV-E PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 12/51/RIVER PARK 5 MARLENE J FRIGO 633 EAST ~tAIN STREET TORRINGTON CT 06790 15/51/RIVER PARK 5 BR/3%N F & I-]ELK'AJ S HEP, RICK 175 SW BONITA COURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 18/51/RIVER PARK 5 LEILA GIBBS ]~kAST,~ 151 SE BfINITA COURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 9/52/RIVER PARK 5 JANET E SOUZA 164 SW BONITA COURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 12/52/RIVER PARK 5 ALFRED EUGENE& ETHEL E BUHL 190 SW BONITA COURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 15/52/RIVER PARK 5 JEAN RGOODYEAR P.O. BOX 7123 PORT STLUCIE FL 34985 10/51/RIVER PARK 5 RICHARD F & CAROL M BRISSE% 3370 GULF OF MEXIOODR LONGBOAT KEY FL 34228 13/51/RIVER PARK 5 ~W & DObR~A S PATRICK 191 BONITACOURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 34952 16/51/RIVER PARK 5 BRADLEY S STOLDT 117 CARVER SO kqOONIAMN 55387 7/52/RIVER PARK 5 JOSEPH/NE KURPICKI 150 SWBONITA COURT PORT STLUCIE FL 34983 10/52/RIVER PARK 5 JAMES L PREglIXN, II 170 SW BONITA O3URT PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 13/52/RIVER PARK 5 ' NICHOLAS PAUL 13 BLOOMER DRIVE BURLINGRON NJ 08016 16/52/RIVER PARK 5 THOMAS B JR & DEBORAH L WII HELEN E HARTFORD 171 EL SITO COURT PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 17/52/RIVER PARK 5 RONALDA & SHAROb 791 SWSOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 2/57/RIVER PARK 6 335 SE AIROSOAVE PORT ST LUCIE FL PUMP STATION ST. LUCIEODUNTY 250 NWCOUNTRYCLU PORT ST LUCIE FL 3 #7 THOMAS A GONZAr~Z 351 SWRAVENSWOOD PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 I RATHAY 34983 18/52/RIVER PARK 5 PATRICIAL & DONALD C DUNCAN 1505 NWPINELAKE DR STUART FL 34994 ;4983 ll/57/RIVER PARK 6 RONALD R & BRENDA J HORSTMEIER 301 SE SOLAZ AVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 ~ILITIES BDR 6986 PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIV ADMIN BLDGANNEX 2300 VIRGINIA AVE ~To PIERCE FL 34982 #3 ATLANTIC GULF'~iTiES OORP AITN: I~AND INVENTORY DEPT. 2601 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33133 1/57/RIVER PARK 6 WILLIS B & PHYLLIS V MALL 305 SE AIROSOAVE PORT ST LUCIE FL 34983 12/57/RIVER PARK 6 ROBERT J &GAYLEMcNIECE 311 SOLAZAVE PORTSTLUCIE FL 34983 #1 ST. LUCIEASSOC, INC 451 SWRAVENSWOODIANE PORT STLUCIE FL 34983 #6 ST LUCIE CO-FT PIERCE FIRE P.O. BOX 3030 Fr. PIERCE FL 34948 #4 CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE 121 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD PORTSTLUCIE FL 34984 #2 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVE FT. PIERCE, FL. 34982 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS March 7, 1~ In accordm that Connie (Commerci~ building a g CocE The Board on Tuesday Adrninistrat, given an o1~ the public 1 should be hearing. County po] outside of' written cox The proceedi: decision mad he will need ~ of the procee, based. Upon in. Any path during a heal If you no 1~ notice to t~ File Num[ Sincerely, ~LUCI} Havert Fei ION£RS '94 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR TERRY L. VIRTA, AICP ce with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised Bishop has petitioned St. Lucie County for a change in zoning from CO d, Office) to PNRD (Planner Non-Residential Development) for the purpose of eneral store for the following property: Lion: 204 SE Prima Vista Blvd., 206 SE Prima Vista Blvd., & 115 SE Airoso Blvd., Port St. Lucie, FL PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on this petition at 9:00 43/I. March 22, 1994 in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of County !on Bldg Annex, 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL. All interested persons will be ,portunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of tearing will also be considered. Written comments to the County Commission ~eceived by the County Planning Division at least 3 days prior to a scheduled cy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case he scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide tments for the record. ~gs of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any ~ by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, t record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record lings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be the request of any party to the proceedin~ individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn y to the proceeding wffi be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying ing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. )nger own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this e new owner. If you have any questions, please call (407) 468-1586 and refer to er RZ-94-002. COU~"Y BO~ OF CO. UNTY COMMISSIONERS tn, Chairman HAVERT L. FENN. District No. 1 · JUDY CULPEPPER. District No. 2 · DENNY GREEN. District No. $ · R. DALE TREFELNER. District No. 4 · CLIFF BARNES. District No. 5 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administrator: ~407) 468-1590 · Growth Management: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407) 468-1576 Codes Compliance: (407) 468:t 571 The tuart News .and The port St. Lucie News (an editi,)n of The Stuart Ne vs) STATE OF FLOR DA COUNTY OF MAI{TIN: COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE: Before the PRITCHARD MANAGER a daily ne~,~pape that the attaehe¢ pUBLIC HEARING in the matter of ~ 22, 1994 in the Stuart Ne~ nnd ~fiant furtl Port St. Lucie Ne Martin County, F Martin County, the said new. pap in said Martin Cc Florida and St. next preceding advertisement; a: paid nor promise rebate, eommissi advertisement News has been e~ in Stuart, Martin County, Florida preeedin~ the fir: advertisement. &corn to and subse~ ibed before me this A I%1 KATHLEEN N. lndersigned authority appeared who on oath says that he/she Ac'°AHNTq PEC of The Stuart News, and The Port St. Lueie News, Published at Stuart in Martin County, Florida, [ copy of advertisement, being a.. ST. LUCIECOUNTYBOARDOF CO UNTYCOS~ISSIONERS Court, xvas l'uhlished in The Fhe Port St. l.ucie Nexvs it] the issues of March 2. 1994 ler says that the said The Stuart Nex~s and The ws is a nexvspaper published at Stuart, in said lorida with offices and paid circulation in lorida, and St. Lucie County, Florida and that ers have heretofore been continuously published ~unty, Florida and distributed in Martin County, Jeie County, Florida, for a period of one year te first publication of the attached copy of id affiant further says that he/she has neither d any person, firm or corporation any'discount, on or refund'for the purpose of securing this ... publieatioll in the said newspaper. The StUart feted as second class matter at the post office' County, Florida, and Ft. Pierce, St. Lueie nd has been for a period of one year next ;t publication of the attached copy of and Zoning me ~ reque~t~ ~ ~J~.ow.~ik.-.~.~; ' C0m~i~ion ~r:6./fiong~n~Z6~ng ~om CO (Commercial, ~)~ PNRD: BLK ~ rude, FL)~ 4) Petltion'of:John~Jetson Pest Co~ 'dJfional Use ~rmJt'to; $~6 ~ ne~ SECTION 3~, IOWNSHIP 35, '~NGE 40, ~P ~2~345 JL~afion: 4145 S. ~.S. ~I, ~ Piece, FL) . - ~?? ~ Per,ion of Rich~d Oldf[eld, has ~fition~ the Planning find Zoning ~mm;ssion ~om CO (Comm~cial, ~i~e) & AR-1 {Agrigultura, R~i- dentiaJ ~ 1 du/a~ to CN {Commer- cial, Neigh~rhood) f~ ~ f~liow- .[ Parcel 1: ~ ;The North 287 fee~ oJ thq. desto'bed land less'the 1,060 feet, ther~ce I ~pt the · Parcel 2: 'Being'a portion of Lot · Iat thereof Book,l, page23 of the lic Re~:ords ida ahd this tract being ticulady described 12~L ~East in: and 530 feet~ East of s~ Oleander',' Avenue ff,~ Street; ' thenc~ - Noh~ thence East 530 feet, t 165 feet, thence West the beginning. All in Township 36 South, Rc iff St'. Lucie County. PI, Parcel 5: Pod'ions of the Northw Southwest t/,~ of Sectic Northeast ~/4 of the So~ Section 4, ail lying in South, Range 40 East bcie Cou~w, ~l~a:i' follows: '- .~ ~ence South 530 f~et to Section 3, nge 40 East rida. ,st ~/4 of the n 3 and the ~hwest ~/~ of 'ownshlp 36 lying in St. escribed as thence rCOIYJJllUe NorJJl* 89°34~6'' . East~ a di~tan¢~ ~f 279.02 feet; fhence run S 00°09'55" W a--~lis- tance .~of 312.89 feet;'thence 87°45'55't W a'dlstcmce of1~Z~67 feet; thence run IN 0! ?50~33'-'~.z/e' a distance ~f 128~50.feet; thence'run N 89°49'15"_W a distance of 108 00 feet to. the East.right' ofm~ay of Oleander Avenue;~thence ~e~n N 00°28'33~'' E~ along t'l~a~'n'~t of way of. said tdistance 0f.188.56 f~et to the P~int Fort Piet~r.~ rCS.')': '~ ~ NORTH UNE~ OF ~SAID SECTION FEJ~T ~ '~'I~E~pO1NT oF '~EGi~ NING?V'~,~'THENC'E ~:: SOUTH 0014'17' WE~T?,~A~gJ~T~CE OF 252.23 FE~T;~HENCE S~H 5056'~'~AST, A D~ST~C~F 29.37 r ?~.THENCE~ ~gRTH '8430'54 '"WEST;~ A DiSTAnCE OF 353.'56 FEET: 'S~H '6723'40~ ~EST, 'A DIST~E OF 660.35 FE~; THENCE S~H 7847'03~' WEST;'A DISTANCE OF 506.99 &EET TO A 'POI~$~F NON ~ADIAL NTERSEC~ION WITH A CIRCU~R 'CURVE C~-- CAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST~V- lNG A ~DIUS OF 566.86 F~T[ A CEIJ1 ~.L':~GLE~OF 8738'A0' ~,~D ~6~E%~DiiJS pCt~NT ~] R~ALO~ THE ~S41D ¢OR~ UNEj A 'DIST~CE ~OF~ 9~01'FE~;TO THE ~RTH QUOTER CORNER OF SM~- TION;~:.22; ~THENCE ~S~H 8945'~- EAST ~ALONG :NO~H LINE, A-D ST~ OF 17~16 F~T TO THE POt~ BEGINNING..- Res~e, A.D~elopm~ ~ R~n- PUBUCHEARINGS Gill ~ held froot* Parc The the' 3.91 Beg/ Str6 then Sour Par( Bein aCCG page Coun desc Comm poin the East of t East 84"1 then a pc 206. then Lot Easl and .Par( The Begj Stre then Sout All. Luci LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~t el I: North 287 feet of the following described land less East 160 feet and the West 279.02 feet containing Acres more or less. nning at the center of Oleander Avenue and Second et, thence East 1,060 feet, thence North 333 feet, ce West to the center ofsaid Oleander Avenue, thence h along the Center Less and except the West 36 feet. el 2: g a portion of Lot 38, White City Subdivision rding to tAe Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, 23 of the official Public Records of St. Lucie ty, Florida and this tract being more particularly ribed as follows: ence at the Northeast corner of said Lot 38; thence h 89"42'56" West, a distance of 100.00 feet to a t on the-South right-of-way line of Midway Road and North line of said Lot 38; thence South 00"16'49" · a distance of 265.46 feet to the point of. beginning · e herein described tract; thence South 00"16'49" a distance of.121.30 feet toa point; thence South 4'49" West,-a distance of 16.07 feet to a point; ce South 00,16'49" East, a distance of 409.64 feet to ,iht; thence North 89"40'31" West, a distance of 18 feet to a point on the West line of said Lot 38; ce North 00"19'47" East along the West line of said 38 a distance of 532.65 feet; thence South 89"39"58" · a distance of 216.51 feet to the point of beginning containing 2.531 acres more or less. ml 3 East 160 feet of the follwing described parcel: nning at the center of Oleander Avenue and-Second mt, thence East 1,060 feet· thence North 333 feet, =e West to the center of said Oleander Avenue, thence along the center of said Avenue to the beginning. Section 3, Township 36 South, Range 40 East in St. County, Florida. ~OMMUNI~ DEVF_LOI:~£Nt' S1'. LUCIE C_~., FL Par The BegJ sai¢ Nort feet sect CoUr Parc Port Sec1 Sec1 lyi~ el 4 East 160 feet of the following described parcel: nning at a point 165 feet South and 530 feet East of center of Oleander Avenue and Second Street; thence ~h 165 feet, thence East 530 feet, thence South 165 ., thence West 530 feet to the beginning. All in ion 3, TownShip 36 South, Range 40 East in St. Lucie .ty, Florida. el 5: ions of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of ion 3 and the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of ion 4, all lying in Township 36 South, Range 40 East, g in St. Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: C~m~ence at the center of Oleander Avenue and Second Street shown by the Map of record filed the 24th day of May, 1894 in the Brevard County Public Records and r~cqrded i~ Plat Book 1, Page 200 of the Public Records of St. L~c~e County, Florida, thence run North, along an assumed Dea~ing of North 00°28,~3- East, a distance of 333.73 feet; thence run North 89 34'06" East, a distance of 3S.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continue Nort ru/% S 87 01°5 89°4 of ~ alon dist Cont h 89°34· 06" East, a distance of 279.02 feet; thence S 00°091'55'' W a distance of 312.89 feet; thence run "45'55" W a distance of 167.67 feet; thence run N 0"33" W a distance of 128.50 feet; thence run N 9'15" W a distance of 108.00 feet to the East right 'ay of Oleander Avenue; thence run N 00°28,33" E, g the East right of way of said Oleander Avenue, a ~nce of 188..56 feet to the Point of Beginning. aining 1.71 Acres more or less DESCR1PTI A PARCEL LUCtE COL 89023 2639.20 F! 89 o45'43" OF 1708.1 DISTANCE FEET; THE~ WEST, A 506.99' FEi CONCAVe,' OF 87038 INTERSEC1 CURVE, A 00 °36'34" THENCi~ S£ TO THE EAST ALO: BEGINNING CONTAININ 3N: ;i - OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 3'9 EAST, ST. rNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: E AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 22, A DISTANCE OF !ET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH EAST, CONTINUE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID sEcTION 22, A DISTANCE S FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH OOO14'17" WEST, A OF 252.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 50o56-15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF. 29.37 CE NORTH 84030'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 353.5'~ FEET; SOUTH 67 o 23'40" STANCE OF.660.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78047-03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF !.T TO A POINT OF NON RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A~ CIRCULAR CURVE t' ~ THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 566.86 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE ~0" AND WHOSE RADIUS-POI NT BEARS SOUTH 88 o 15' 14" WEST FROM SAID ION; THENCE NO.RTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID :)ISTANCE OF 867.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 22;. UTH 89° 23f26" EAST; ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 289.01 FEET RTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89o45'.~3..- ~G SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1708.16 FEET TO THE POINT~)F_ .~ 15.5 ACRES MORE OR'LESS. BOARD OF C COMMISSIC DATE: TO: OUNTY ~N£RS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR ~RRY L ~RTA. A~Oo F A X # (407) 468-1735 TRANSMISSION COVER FORM FAX# ATTN: NO. OF PAGE: SENDER: P~ONE: ~ /(INCL.' COVER Transmit Confirmation ~eport No. : 004 Receiver : 84072214126 Transmitter : SLC/CONM DEUELOPMENT 'Date : Mar 01,94 9:54 Time : 04'09 Hode : Norm Pages : 06 Result : OK ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA MARCH 22, 1994 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: the St. the prov St. Luc: request 1 ) Pet (co Der the 2) 3) 4)¸ 5) NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with of in Cou (Lo & 1 Pet (co pro Der LO] (Lc St. Pet (Re Res as pro ST. AC) (Lo Pet per des SEC ( Lo, Pet Off (Co~ pro] INS] isions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan that the .e County Board of County Commissioners consider their as follows: ition of Connie Bishop, for a change in zoning from CO mmerciai, Office) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential elopment) for the purpose of building a general store for following described property: '2 of Sec%ion 28 Township 36 South Range 40 East, The West lee% of Lot 17 and all of Lots 18, 19, and 20 of Block 50 ~iver Park Unit 5 according %o the plat %hereof as recorded Pla% Book 11, Page 31 of %he public records of St. Lucie nty, FL. cation:.204 SE Prima Vista Blvd, 206 SE Prima Vista Blvd., 15 SE Airoso Blvd., Port St. Lucie, FL) [tion of Edward Bauer, for a Change in Zoning from CO mmercial, Office) to CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) as vided for under Section 11.06.00, St. Lucie County Land elopment Code for the following described property: 1, BLOCK 56, RIVER PARK UNIT 6 :ation: SW corner of Prima Vista Blvd. & Airoso Ave, Port Lucie, FL) ition of George Brown, for a Change in Zoning from RM-5 sidential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/ac) %oAR-1 (Agriculture, idential - l~du/ac), to be able to raise farm animals such horses, cows, and goats for the following described perty: LUCIE GARDENS 23-36-40, BLK 2, LOT 12 LESS RD R/W (9.70 :ation: 1050 Tilton Road, Port St. Lucie, FL) ition of John Jetson Pest Control, for a Conditional Use nit to open a new pest control service for the following =ribed property: EION 34, TOWNSHIP 35, RANGE 40, MAP #24345 :ation: 4145 S. U.S. #1, Fort Pierce, FL) [tion of Richard Oldfield, for a from CO (Commercial, [ce) & AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CN nmercial, Neighborhood) for the following described )er%y: ~RT LEGAL DESCRIPTION NO. i HERE 5104 Oleander Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL) (Lo(:ation: 6) 7) Petition of Drug Abuse Treatment Association, Inc., for a or adjustment to an existing Conditional Use, to allow for ay treatment for adolescents. maj ad Se~ 1/~ (Lc Pet Pla nu/~ II~ (Lo Re~ 2ion 32, Township 35, Range 40 - the NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of SW - less North 200 feet. :ation: 4590 Selvitz Road, Fort Pierce, FL) ition of Callaway Land and Cattle Company, for a Final nned Unit Development approval for residential parcel ber 8 at The Reserve, to be known as The Pines at The erve (Parcel 8). ERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION NO. 2 HERE cation: Northeast corner of The Reserve, a Development of ional Impact) PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commissi)n with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ HAVERT FENN, CHAIRMAN PUHLISH DATE~ MARCH 2, 1994 '1 · : 4) trol, ditiona! Use lng described property: RANGE 40,4 (Lo_caiiom Pierce, FL) ' ' 5) PetitiOn of RiChbrd. Oldfield; has, petitioned the pjanningTan~ .zoning j CommiSSio~ from CO (CoTnmerCia!, Office) & dential- 1 alu/ac) t° CN (Commer- :ParceJ 4: 8escribed parcel: - Beg nnit~g at ~ po~,t t 65'feet South and 530 feet East of said tenter of Oleander-. Avenue and Second Street; theme' North 165 fe~t, thence East 530 fee~, thence South 165 feet, ~ ~W,~st 530 feet to the beginn~g. ~l!,--in Dedion 3, TownshitS' 36 So~;Rar~e 40 East Northeast ¼ of the~S0uthwest ¼ of Section 4; all ly rig in Township 36 South, "~nge, ~0-.~as~ 4)~ng :in St. ,£ucie Corinth/, f:io'r~da: ~'~s~rib~d ClS Pub.: F~b. 4. 199~¢ BOARD OF COMMIS~_ DATE: / TO: COUNTY ION6RS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR 1F_RRY L VIRTA. AICP F A X # (407) 468-1735 TRANSMISSION COVER FORM FAX# AT~JZN: 1~O. OF PAt SENDER: NO. Receiver Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages xesutt Transmit Confirmation Report : O06 : 84072214126 : SLC/COMM DEVELOPMENT : 3an 27,94 11:37 : 01'$5 : Norm : 02 : OK ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 1994 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with S.ection 11.00,03 of the St..Lu.cie COunty Land Development Code and in accordance with the pro~.isions of t~e St. Lucie d0unty Co.mPr.ehensive Pla. n that t.he St. Lucre County .Board of County dommissloners consider their request as follows: 1 ) Pet foz 4¢ the Th~ CIg 4O Re¢ 2 ) Pet (Cc pux des N1 10 of i n Cou (Lo & 1 3 ) Pet (Re Res off des. Lot ( Lo~ 4 ) Pet~ ext~ pre, Dew A pc the rec¢ of ( Loc .ition of The New Testament Baptist Church of America, Inc. a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential,'Single-Family - .u/ac) to RF (Religious, Facilities) to allow a church for following described property: West 255 feet of the East 430 feet of Tract 16, GARDEN ¥ FARMS SUBDIVISION, of Section 5, Township S5 South, Ranqe EaSt, as!recorded in Plat Book 2, Page ~, of the Public 'ords of St. Lucie County, Florida; less and excepting refrom the South 25 feet and the North 25 feet. cation: NOrth 25th Street & Avenue T, Fort Pierce, FL) ition of'iC0nnimi!Bishop., a change in zoning from CO mmercial, Office) to CN ( ommercial, Neighborhood) for the pose of building a general store for the following cribed property: ~2 of Section 28 Township 36 South Range i0 East, The West feet of Lot 17 and all ~f Lots 18~j and 20 of Block 50 ~iver Park Unit 5 according to them... thereof as recorded Plat Book 11, page 31 of the public records of St. Lucie nty, FL. =ation: 204 SE Prima Vista Blvd, 206 SE Prima Vista Blvd., 15 SE Airoso Blvd., Port St. Lucie, FL) ition of Bernar4 Powell, for a change in zoning from RS-4 sidential, Single-Family - 4du/ac) to PNRD (Planned~Non- idential Development) to allow for a 2,000 square feet [Ce building and associated improvements for the following =ribed property: 1, Block 27, River Park, Unit S County, FL. :ation: SW Corner of Entrada Avenue & Camino Street) ltion of Charles Grunbaum, for a (12) twelve month ~nsion to the site plan associated with phase one of the ,iously approved Eckerds Planned Non-Residential ~lopment (PNRD) for the following described property: ~rtion o£ lots 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 in Block 39 of subdivision entitled "River Park Unit Four" as ~rded in Plat Book 11 on page 9 of the public records ~t. Lucie County, Florida. ~ation: NE corner of Prima Vista Blvd. & Floresta Drive) PUR~ decides colEmlSSlC h earing, such purl proceedil gs ~s made, which record includes evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. UANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or n with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for ose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the the testimony and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ HAVERT FENN, CHAIRMAN PUBLISH DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1994 'First Baptist Church Port Saint Lucie 115 NE Solida Drive Port Sa#~t Lucie, Florida 34985 ~ March 21, 1994 Ii~ COMMUN!TY OE'4ELOPiviENT . . .~ ,~c,,c c'0 ~ Dear BOgrd of county commxssxoners; 'ST~_.--',;~-t~ / · r Would like to take this opportunity to respond to your letter dated March 7, 1994, regarding a proposed zoning change for 'the property on the Southeast corner of .Airoso and Prima Vista Bgulevard. Changing the zoning from CO(Commercial/Office) to PRNDt.Planned Non-Residential Development) for the purpose of constru¢.ting a convenience store would be a horrible mistake. (407) 878-1488 By general my prey. conside: Lei Change allowing COnnie Bi~hoD_ or any corporation to build a store wou~d be ~etrim~tal for the same reasons stated in .ous letter. I will repeat these reasons belo~ ration: With the large number of pre-teen, teenager and young single adults (15-25 year olds) already congregating at Sportsman Park, it is my opinion that this proposed establishment would become another gathering point for those with nothing to do but "hang out". The availability of alcohol in such close proximity to Sportsman Park would also be inviting trouble. The increased traffic hazards with cars entering and leaving that location from both directions(Airoso and Prima Vista). This would be dangerous especially before and after school. Numerous children from a new elemen- tary and middle school salk on the sidewalks by that intersection. It would soon become an eyesore to the homes in-close proximity to that location. me implore you not to approve the request for a zoning !or the Southeast corner of Prima Vista and Airoso. Sincerely, Reverend Charles A. Burke, Jr. CAB/sg POINTS TO CONSIDER REGARDING COMMERCIALIZATION OF INTERSECTION OF PRIMA VISTA AND AiROSA BOULEVARDS 1) Prima Vista Boulevard, from Naranja to Airosa is completely developed as a residential .community. There are convenience stores on (i) Airosa/Bayshore, just north of St James (25th) Street, and (2) Floresta, south of Prima Vista. It also appears a commercial building is going up on the corner of Prima Vista and Bayshore Boulevard which is already developed as a commercial street. 2) An enormous complex, west of Airosa on Prima Vista, including a college campus, several churches, community recreation facilities such as buildings, ball parks, basketball and tennis courts, playgrounds, swimming pool, as well as a fire/rescue station, and schools, both elementary and middle, impact this intersection in the following ways: A. A significantly larger number of pedestrians than on most other intersections in Port St Lucie B. Frequent emergency runs from the fire/rescue station C. Continuous sporting events throughout the year, Little League Baseball, Football, Soccer, as well as miscellaneous other individual use of the facilities on one side of the street, and the Library, Community Center, and Swimming Pool, on the other D. Three churches with regularly scheduled services as well as special events throughout the week contribute additional traffic to the area 3) Prima Vista is the main east/west roadway between US#! and 1-95, bearing both commercial and residenta! traffic. The traffic is especially heavy during spring training at Mets Stadium. 4) Airosa and Prima Vista is a dangerous intersection, with a high incidence of automobile accidents, mostly minor, but significant since additional pull-out traffic will increase the number of potential accidents rather than reduce them.