HomeMy WebLinkAboutEconomys, JuliaBOARD OF COUNTY DEVeLOPMeNT
COMMISSION6RS ·/ COORDINATOR
J GARY AMENT
June 26, 1~86
Julia Economys, As Trustee
of the Helen Politis Revocable Trust
P. O. Box 1270
Fort Pierce, FL 33454
Dear Mrs. Economys:
Please be advised that on Wednesday, May 14, 1986, the Board of County
Commissioners granted your petition to amend the future land use
Classification set forth in the St. Lucie County Growth Management
Policy Plan for property located on the east side of Oleander
Avenue between Midway Road and Weatherbee Road.
On the same date, the Board of County Commissioners also granted
your petition for the rezoning of the same piece of property.
A copy of the respective Ordinance and Resolution is enclosed
for your information.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTy, FLORIDA
Havert L. Fenn, Chair~n
kj
Enclosures
HAVERT L. FENN. District No. I · E. E. GREEN, District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5
County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100
Coordinator: Ext. 398 · Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317
'ST.LU'CiE COUN
ORDINANCE NO. 8~-33
AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNt'
86-01 BY C~GING ~E L~ USE DESIG~TION
OF THE PROPER~ LO~TED BE~EN OLE~ER A~E
~ ~H U.S. I (NO~ P~ICU~Y DESCRIBED
HE~IN) FROM ~ (~SIDE~I~,
(P~SIDE~I~, ~DI~) FOR P~C~ A ~ FROM
CG (CO~RCI~, GENE~) ~ ~ (~SIDE~I~,
~DIUN) FOR P~CEL B~ ~ING FI~INGS~ PROVIDING
FOR ~I~ THE NECESS~Y C~GES ON THE OFFICI~
ZONING ~ OF ~. -~UCIE ~~ PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS ~ S~~ILI~I PROVIDING FOR
FILING WITH THE DEP~~ OF ~ATE
TRE DEP~NE~ OF ~~I~ ~FAI~
EFFECTIVE DATE ~ ~OPTION.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of. St. Lucie
County, Florida, has made the following determinations:
1. Julia Economys, as Trustee of the Helen Politis
Revocable Trust presented a petition to amend the future land use
classification set forth in the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan from RL (Residential, Low) to RM
(Residential, Medium) for Parcel A and from CG (Commercial,
General) to RM (Residential, Medium) for Parcel B as described
below.
'2. The St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency, after
holding a public hearing on May 1, 1986, of which due notice was
published at least seven (7) days prior to said hearing and all
owners of property within five hundred feet (500') were notified
by mail of said hearing, has recommended that the Board deny the
future land use classification set forth in the St. Lucie County
Growth Management Plan from RL (Residential, Low) to RM
(Residential, Medium) for Parcel A and from CG (Commercial,
651
General) to RM (Residential, Medium) for Parcel B as described
below.
3. The Board held a public hearing on May 14, 1986, after
publishing a notice of such hearing in the Fort Pierce News
Tribune on May 6, 1986.
NOW, ~THEREFOItE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida:
A. ~AN~ IN F~FUl~ LAND ~ ~T.ASSlFICATION.
The futur~ land use classification set forth in the St.
Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan for that property
described as follows:
PARCEL A:
Section 3, Township 36 South, Range 40 East,
Begin 963 'feet East and 715.5 feet North of
the Southwest corner of the Northwest one-
quarter, run East 477 feet, thence North 660
feet, thence West 477 feet, thence South 660
feet to the Point of Beginning (7.23 acres).
and
Section 3, Township 36 South, Range 40 East,..
Begin 485 feet East and 715.5 feet North of
the Southwest corner of the Northwest one-
quarter, run East 479 feet, thence North 660
feet, thence West 478 feet, thence SoUth 660
feet to the Point of Beginning (7.25 acres).
and
White City Subdivision Section 3, Township 36
South, Range 40 East, the East one-half of
Lot 9 (9.02 acres).
and
White City Subdivision Section 3, Township 36
South, Range 40 East, all of Lot 10.
and
White City Subdivision Section 3, Township 36
South, Range 40 East, the South 188 feet of
the North 485 feet of Lot 22 - less the South
108 feet of the West 165 feet (1.69 acres).
and
White City Subdivision Section 3, Township 36
South, Range 40 East, that part of Lot 21
lying North of Midway Road - less the South
647 feet and less Midway Road right-of-way -
(7.55 acres).
PARCEL B:
Commencing at a point 600 feet West and 225
feet South of the Northeast corner of Lot 11,
White City, a subdivision of Section 3,
Township 36 South, Range 40 East, as recorded
in Plat Book 1, Page 23 of the Public Records
of St. Lucie County, Florida, for a Point of
Beginning, thence run North 225 feet to a
point on the North line of said Lot 11;
thence run West 60 feet more or less to the
Northeast corner of Lot 10 of said White City
Subdivision; thence run South along the East
line of said Lot 10, 225 feet to a point;
thence run East 60 feet more or less to the
Point of Beginning.
owned by Julia Economys, Trustee of the Helen Politis Revocable
Trust, be, and the same is hereby changed from RL (Residential,
Low) to RM (Residential, Medium) for Parcel A and from CG
(Commercial, General) to RM (Residential, Medium) for Parcel B.
B. FIN~ING OF CONSISTENCY.
This Board specifically determines that the approved
change in future land use plan is consistent with the policies
and objectives contained in the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan.
C. CHANGES TO ZONING W2~P.
The St. Lucie County Development Coo£dinator is hereby
authorized and directed to cause the changes to be made on the
50i 653
BO0t~
Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make
notation of reference to the date of adoption of this ordinance.
D. ~_~,O~FTJCTING PROVISIONS.
Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only
tO unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County 'ordinances
and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this
ordinance are hereby~ superseded by this ordinance to the extent
of such conflict.
E. SEg~EI~%BILIT~.
If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held
or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such
holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this
ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be
held to be inapplicable to any person, property or circumstances,
such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other
person, property or circumstances.
F. ~pLI~RTT. TT~OF O~INAI~C]~.
This ordinance shall be applicable as stated in
Paragraph A.
G. FXT.X~WI?N ~RE. DEP~W~OF S~ATE.
The Clerk be and hereby is directed forthwith to send a
certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Laws,
Department of State, The C~pitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304.
H. pILIN~ WITH ~RPAR~R~OF COI~t~UNI~'YAFFAIRS.
The County Attorney shall send a certified copy of this
ordinance to the Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive
Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301.
This ordinance
shall take effect upon receipt of
official acknowledgment from the Office of Secretary of State
that this ordinance has been filed in that office.
After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was
as follows:
Chairman Havert L. Fenn
Aye
Vice-Chairman Jim Minix
Aye
Commissioner E. E. Green
Absent
Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner
Aye
Commissioner Jack Krieger
Aye
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 14th day of May, 1986.
762055
BOARD OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONERS '-' ;~
655
ORDINANCE NO.
86-33
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY PLAN, ORDINANCE
NO. 86-01 BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN OLEANDER AVENUE
~ND SOUTH U.S. I (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED.
HEREIN) FROM RL (RESIDENTIAL, LOW} TO R~
{RESIDENTIAL, P. EDIU~) FOR PARCEL A AND FROM
CG (CO~ERCIAL, GENERAL) TO 1~ (RESIDENTIAL,
~IUM] FOR PARCEL B; NAKING FINDINGS; PROVIDING
FOR MAKING THE N~CESSARY CHANGES ON THE OFFICIAL
ZONING ~ OF ST. LI]CIE COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND
THE DEPARTTIENT OF CO~/~UNITY AFFAIRS AND FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE AND ADOPTION.
~w the Board of County Commissioners of. St. Lucie
County, Florida, has made the following determinations:
1. Julia Economys, as Trustee of the Helen Poli~iS
Revocable Trust presented a petition to amend the future land use
classification set forth in the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan from RL (Residential, Low) to RM
(Residential, Medium) for Parcel A and from CG (Commercial,
General) to RM (Residential, Medium) for Parcel B as described
below.
2. The St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency, after
holding a public hearing on May 1, 1986, of which due notice was
published at least seven (7) days prior to said hearing and all
owners of property within five hundred feet (500') were notified
by mail of said hearing, has recommended that the Board deny the
future land use classification'set forth in the St, Lucie County
Growth Management Plan from RL (Residential, Low) to RM
(Residential, Medium) for Parcel A and from CG (Commercial,
General) to RM (Residential, Medium) for Parcel B as described
below.
3. The Board held a public hearing on May 14, 1986, after
publishing a notice of such hearing in the Fort Pierce News
Tribune on May 6, 1986.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida:
A. ~.~.~R IN FUTU_~R T.ANI~ USE ~T~SIFICATION.
The future land use classificatiOn set forth in the St.
Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan for that property
described as follows:
PARCEL A:
Section 3, Township 36 South, Range 40 East,
Begin 963 feet East and 715.5 feet North of
the Southwest corner of the Northwest one-
quarter, run East 477 feet, thence North 660
feet, thence West 477 feet, thence South 660
feet to the Point of Beginning (7.23 acres).
and
Section 3, Township 36 South, Range 40 East,
Begin 485 feet East and 715.5 feet North of
the Southwest corner of the Northwest one-
quarter, run East 479 feet, thence North 660
feet, thence West 478 feet, thence South 660
feet to the Point of Beginning (7.25 acres).
and
White City Subdivision Section 3, Township 36
South, Range 40 East, the East one-half of
Lot 9 (9.02 acres).
and
White City Subdivisi6n Section 3, Township 36
South, Range 40 East, all of Lot 10.
and
White City Subdivision Section 3, Township 36
South, Range 40 East, the South 188 feet of
the North 485 feet of Lot 22 - less the South
108 feet of .the West 165 feet (1.69 acres).
and
White City Subdivision Section 3, Township 36~
South, Range 40 East, that part of Lot 21
lying North of Midway Road - less the South
647 feet and less Midway Road right-of-way -
(7.55 acres).
PARCEL B .'
Commencing at a point 600 feet West and 225
feet South of the Northeast corner of Lot 11,
White City, a subdivision of Section 3,
Township 36 South, Range 40 East, as recorded
in Plat Book 1, Page 23 of the Public Records
of St. Lucie County, Florida, for a Point of
Beginning, thence run North 225 feet to a
point on the North line of said Lot 11;
thence run West 60 feet more or less to the
Northeast corner of Lot 10 of said White City
Subdivision; thence run South along the East
line of said Lot 10, 225 feet to a point;
thence run East 60 feet more or less to the
Point of Beginning.
owned by Julia Economys, Trustee of .the Helen Politis Revocable
Tr~mst, be, and the same is hereby changed from RL (Residential,
Low) to RM (Residential, Medium) for Parcel A and from CG
(Commercial, General) to RM (Residential, Medium) for Parcel B.
B. FX~ING OF CONSISTENC~.
This Board specifically determines that the approved
change in future land use plan is consistent with the policies
and objectives contained in the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan.
C. ~%NGKS TO ZONING ~AP.~
The St..Lucie County Development Coordinator is hereby
authorized and directed to cause the changes to be made on the
Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make
notation of reference to the date of adoption of this ordinance.
D. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only
to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County 'Ordinances
and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this
ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent
of such conflict.
8mmmm iT .
If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held
or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such
holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this
ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be
held to be inapplicable to any person, property or circumstanc~s,
such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other
person, property or circumstances.
F. APPLIfaRILIT~ OF ORDINANCE.
This ordinance shall be applicable as stated in
Paragraph A.
The Clerk be and hereby is directed forthwith to send a
certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Laws,
Department of State, The C~pitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304.
H. FII. ING,WITH DRPART~R~OF CO##[INIT~AFFAIRS.
The County Attorney shall send a certified copy of this
ordinance to the Department of 'Community Affairs,'2571 Executive
Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301.
I. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of
official acknowledgment from the Office of Secretary of State
that this ordinance has been filed in that office.
After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was
as follows:
Chairman Havert L. Fenn Aye
Vice-Chairman Jim Minix Aye
Commissioner ~.. E. Green Absent
Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner Aye
Commissioner Jack Krieger Aye
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 14th day of May, 1986.
ATTBST:
BOARD OF COUNTY CO~qISSIO~NERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSiON£RS
COUNTY
AI'I'ORNCY
Daniel S. Mc Intyre
Sorah W, Woods · ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNCY
Krista A, Storey · ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORN£Y
May 27, 1986
Mr. J. Thomas Beck
Program Administrator
Department of Community Affairs
Development of Regional Impact Section
2571 Executive Center Circle East
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Gentlemen:
Enclosed, as directed in the ordinances, are certified
copies of Ordinances 86-24, 86-25, 86-26, 86-28, and 86-30 which
were adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County on May 13, 1986. Also enclosed are certified copies of
Ordinances 86-31, 86-32, 86-33, 86-34, 86-35, and 86-36 which
were adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County on May 14, 1986.
DSM/fh
Enclosures
~in~yl AS~tMorneCIn~
Copies to:
Development Coordinator (w/encl.)
Planning Administrator (w/o encl~)
HAVERT L. FINN, District No. I · E. E. GRE£N. Distrl~ No. 2 '~ JACK KRIEGER,, Distric~ No. 3 ~' R. DALE TREFELNER0 Distdct No. 4 - JIM MINIX. D~smct NO. 5
Coun~ Administrator - W[LDON B. LEWIS
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce. FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Ext. 2t4
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE )
The undersigned, Clerk of the Board of County Ccm~ssioners of the
County and State aforesaid, does hereby certify that the attached
Ordinances Nos. 86-31, 86-32, 86-33, 86-34, 86-35 and 86-36 are true
and correct copies of Ordinances adopted by the said Board of County
Comnissioners at a meeting held on the 14th day of May, 1986.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said Board this 21st day of May, 1986.
Roger Poitras, Clerk of the
Board of County Ccn~nissioners,
St. Lucie County, Florida
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
MINUTES - EVENING MEETING ON MAY 14, 1986
1-1580
~ .*.~'~ - PETTTI~ OF JULIA ~ to amend future land use
classification from RL (9~sidential, Low) and CG (Commercial, General)
to ~4 (Residential, .Medit~n) for property located between South U.S.
#1 and oleander Avenue, approximately 600 feet north of west Midway
.
Attorney Robert M. Lloyd, on behalf of petitioner, requested Board ap-
proval of amendment to future land use classification frum RL to CG.
Architect Jack Scott was present and Engineer Dick Helstrcm addressed
the Board and responded to questions.
There a~peared before the Board to express opposition to the petition
the following: M.M. Richardson, Mrs. Arlene Goodman, F.H. Conrad, Her-
bert Beach, Ed Hill, Leon Fowler and fhlilia Richardson.
Based on the recommendation of Staff, it was moved by Com. Krieger,
seconded by Com. Trefelner, to adopt Ordinance No. 86-33, amending the
St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, Ordinance No. 86-01
by changing tb~ land use designation of the property located between
Oleander Avenue and South U.S. 1 frcm RL (Residential, Low) to RM (Resi-
dential, Medium) for Parcel A and from CG (Cxxm~ercial, General) to RM
(Residential, Medium) for Parcel B; making findings; providing for making
the necessary changes on the official zoning map of St. Lucie County,
and,' upon roll call, motion carried unan~ly.
st. iucie
February 21, 1986
Mr. Ralph K. HoOk
Department of CammunityAffairs
Bureau of Local Resource Planning
--..~257! Executive Center Circle, East
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Subject: Local G_oye~nment Comprehensive Plan-Documents
Dear Mr. Hook:
Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning
and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council reviewed the Amendments to St.
Lucie County Future Land Use Element at its regular meeting o~ February 21,
1986.
~'The following comments were-appro~ed by Council for transmittal to the
State Departmlent of Community Affairs pursuant to Sections 163.3184(I)(c)
and (2), Florida Statutes, for consideration by the County prior to
adoption of the document.
Eval uati on
The proposed aJnendments to the Future Land Use Elem~dt have been reviewed
in accordance with the requirements of Chaoter 163, Florida Statutes,
Council 's-review procedures, and Council's adopted plans and policies. It
should be noted that this is the first occasion which Council has been
asked to provide comments on proposed individual changes to a Future Land
Use_-Element Map. These proposed changes cumulatively represent less than
five percent of the land area within the local government's jurisdiction.
Prior to amendments to Chapter 163, F.S. by the 1985 Legislature, local
governments were not required to submit Land Use Plan amendments which rep-
resented less .than five percent of the land area. The five percent thresh-
old was deleted and Council will now review all changes'. The following
comment is offered as a result of that review.
--COM --DIS. PR. ~,PKS. ~Y.H.
._~AG- ~ ENG. ~ PERS. ~ FI N.
~ PT. ~ LANDFL ~ PUR. ~APPR.
~ Al'Pl. - ~ UB. ~ REC. ~CLERIL ' -
~911 __M1. ADM. __ ROAD __COLL
_co.~. sec. __UT. CO. _ S£~V. __£~£~.
6~0 s. dido hic~ -- chc,~man
p.o. drawer 396 m~£~
stuart, IIoHda, 33495-0396 margaret c. bowmen
kol, ent. ~
Wc~ chairman
daniel m. ¢cu~
Mr. Ralph K. Hook ~'
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of Local Resource Planning
February 21, 1986
Page T~vo
The proposed amendments present no conflict or inconsistency
with Council's adopted plans and policies.
If you need additional information or have any questions, please do not
hesitate to call me.
Executi ye Direct~r
DMC: 1 b ~
cc: The tt~orable 14avert L.' Fenn, Chairm~n
RL
RM
CG
BLUE
GREEN
RED
N
PA ~R~EL A
PETITION OF JULIA ECONOMYS, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
HELEN POLITIS REVOCABLE TRUST, DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 1981
BY AGENTS: NEILL, GRIF'FIN, JEFFRIES, & LLOYD
TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
OF PARCEL A FROM RL TO RM
& PARCEL B FROM CG TO RM
AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WEDNESDAY
MAY 14, 1986
7:00 P.M.
Petition of Julia Economys as Trustee of the Helen Politis
~Revocable Trust, to amend the future land use classification
of the St. LUcie County Growth Management Policy Plan from CG
(Commercial, General) and RL (Low Density Residential Development)
to RM (Medium Density Residential Development) for the following
described property:
......... (See attached legal)
Please note that all proceedings before the Board of
County Commissioners are electronically recorded. Any
person who decides.to appeal any action taken by the Board
of County Co~f, issioners at this meeting will need a record
of. the proceedings and for such purpose may need tO ensure
that a verbatim record og the proceedings is made.
Prior to the public hearing notice of the same was
sent to all adjacent property owners.
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSION£RS
April 24, 1986
DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATOR
J, GARY AMENT
In compliance with the provisions of Florida Statutes, you
are hereby advised that Julia Economys, as Trustee of the
Helen Politis Revocable Trust dated September 16, 1981, has
petitioned the St. Luaie County 8card of County Commissioners
to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie
County Growth Hanagement Policy Plan from RL (Low Density
Residential Development) on Parcel A and CG (Commercial,
General) on'Parcel B to RN (Hedium Density Residential
Development) on the following described property:
(See attached legal)
A public hearing on'the petition will be held at 7:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, Hay 14, 1986, in Room 101, St. Lucie County
Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce,
Florida. Ail interested persons will be given an opportunity
to be heard at that time.
Please note all proceedings before the Board of County
Commissioners are electronically recorded. Any person who
decides to appeal any action taken by the Board of County
Commissioners at this meeting will need a record of the
proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above described
parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. The
Petitioner wishes to utilize the property for multi-family
housing development.
If you have any questions, additional information may be
obtained by calling Amea Code 305-466-1100, Extension
Very truly yours,
BOARD OF COUNTY COHHtSSIO~ERS
SI/>UCIEi~,, C~_UNTY. . F~'
Havert L. Fenn, Chairman
HAVERT L FENN. District No. I · E. E. GREEN. District No. 2 * JACK KRIEGER. District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER District No. 4 · JIM MINIX District No 5
County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100
Coordinator: Ext, 316 · Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317
PARCEL A: Change Land Use from RL to RM
3 36 40 BEG 963 FT E & 715.5FT N OF SW COR OF NW ¼, RUN E 477 FT,TH N 660
FT,TH W .~77. FT,TH S 660 FT TO POB (7.23 AC) ~
AND
3 36~40 BEG 485 FT E & 715.5 FT N OF SW COR OF NW ¼,RUN E 479 FT,TH N 660
FT,TH W 478 FT,TH S 660 FT TO POB (7.25 AC)
AND
WHITE CITY S/D 03 36 40 E ½ OF LOT 9 (9.02 AC)~
AND
WHITE CITY S/D 03 36 40 LOT i0~
AND
WHIT~~ CITY S/D 03 36 40 S 188 FT OF N 485 FT OF LOT 2fA'~'LESS S 108 FT OF.W
165 FT- (1.69 AC) '
AND
WHITE CITY S/D 03 36 40 THAT PART OF LOT 21 LYG N OF MIDWAY RD-LESS S 647
FT & LESS MIDWAY RD R/W- (7.55 AC)~
PARCEL B: Change Land Use from CG to RM
Commencing at a point 600 feet West and 225 feet South of the NE corner of
Lot 11, White City, a subdivision of Section 3, Township 36'South, Rmnge 40
East, as recorded in Pla~rBook 1, Page 23 of the Public Records of St. Lucie
County, Florida, for a point of beginning, thence run North 225 feet to a
point on the North line of-said Lot 11; thence run West 60 feet more or less
to the Northeast corner of Lot 10 of said White City Subdivision; thence run
South along the East line of Said Lot 10 225 feet to a point: thence run East
60 feet more or less to the point of beginning.
PARCEL A
Economys, Julia (tr)
P.O. Bx. 1507
Ft. ]Pierce, fl 33454
#18 & #19
YounG, Wanitah G
4708 Elm Ave.
ft. Pierce, fl.
33482
#20 & #21
Jacobs, Joseph P
4701 Oleander Ave.
Ft. Pierce, fl. 3348
#23
Lambert, William R
4705 Oleander Ave.
Ft. Pierce, florida 33482
#24
Bays, Ray A & Mary A
4804 Elm Ave.
Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482
#25
Lewis L. & Thelma C
4806 Oleander ave.
Ft. Pierce, fl. 33482
#26
Ley, Fred E. & Eleanor
5401 W. Anthony Rd.
Ocala, Fl.. 32670
Goodman, Jeffery, R.
¢901 Oleander Avenue
Ft. Pierce, Fi 33482
Hamsem, Axel P
4875 Oleander Ave.
Ft. Pierce, F1 33482
# 27
Goodman Jeffery R.
4707 Oleander Ave.
Ft. Pierce, Fi 33482
Bucklen, Dillard H.
4906 Elm Ave.
Ft. Pierce, FI. 33482
Gillingham, Harvey
4902 Elm Ave
Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482
~28
Murcan Robert A
4900 Elm Ave.
Ft. Pierce, fl. 33482
Mcilvoy, Rick & Michel
Rt. 3 Bx. 1150
Ft. Pierce, F1.33451
t32
Bunting, Ralph & EunicE
"2115 Knox Morae Dr.
Titusiville FI. 32790
t33
Maheuron, Everett
4401Pressler Ln.
Ft. Pierce, FI. 33450
#34
Keane, John
628 Weatherbee Road
Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482
~35
Keane, James
6310 SW 41 Ct
Davie, FI.
33314
Temple. Beth Zl'
'~4600 Olo&~ndor Ave.
.j
~37
June, F.,dwaz-4 A;
-4700 Olean4e~' Ave.
138
470~ OJ44nder
#39
Lay, Fred E
5401 W Anthony Rd.
Ocala, Fl.
Kryc, Antoinette
Prevratil, Laverne (ros)
1141 S. Mayfield Ave
Chicago, Il. 60644
#4!
Rickerson, Ammelia (if
4800 Oleander Ave
Ft. Pierce, F1.33482
~#42
Niemoeller,. Arthur
4804 Oleander Ave
Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482
#43White City Methodist Ch. #44
810 W. Midway Road
White City Methodist Ch
ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482
810 W. Midway Road
Ft. Pierce, fl. 33482
#45
Kelly, Marvin D & Margo
Kelly Robert A & Julia
718 W. Midway Road
ft..Pierce, Fl. 33482
#48
Floyd Enterprises inc.
16§1 ?humb Point DR
Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33450
#51'& ~65
Towne South Inc - Lessee-
Gilmore, Rosetta(lf est)
437 E Atlantic Blvd.
Suite 1
Pompano Beach, Fl. 33060
#54
Barker, Edgar
501 Weatherbee Road
Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482
#46
TBG Taurus Equities Inc.
2455 Sunrise Blvd.
Suite 11
Ft. Lauderdale, Fi. 33304
#49
Backiel, Tony
706"W. Midway Road
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482
#52
Curry, Chandler P
RR 1 Bx. 26
Neversink, Ny 12765
~55
Stanton, John P.
4515 S. Fed Hwy.
Ft. Pierce, F1 33482
#47
Hoffman, Paul
Bx. 119
Pocono S~it, Pa. 18.34
#5O
Morgan, Josephine
604 W. Midway Road
Ft. Pierce, FI. 33482
#53
Bell, Dorothy G
415 Weatherbee Road
'Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482
#56
Lloyd, Clifton Jr.
Lloyd, James V
4403 Metzger Road.
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33450
Baakeyfield, ~rJoria E iLicauai, Paul P
501 #aathsrtwe Road~ 3200 ~avilla Blvd.
#59
Mullins, Douglas
3302 Enterprise Road
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482
#60
Foundation Equip. Corp.
38 Ave & 10th St
LonG Island, N.y. 11105
#61
Economys, Julia(tr)
P.O. Bx 1507
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33454
#62 & #63
Murphy, John
Peterson, Irene
Peterson, Kenneth
985 SE 18th Ave, Apt 303
Deerfield Bch.,F1. 33441
#72
Toy P.L.
P.O. Bx 203
Ki~tanning, Pa. 16201
#64
Floyd, Charles L
1651 Thumb Point Dr.
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33450
#73
Johnson, Dale
4800 S. US 1
Ft. Pierce, Fl.
33482
#71
Nelson, Robert
Lonser/ Donald
Frischkorn, Paul M Jr.
2721 S. Fed Hwy
Suite 21
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482
#75
Morgan, Fred ~
3055 SE Pinevally R~
Port'St. Lucie, Fl.
33452
The News Tribune ~o..~.r~.~.s~.Lu~ .
~,orlu~ Tuesday, April 22. 1986 C5'
CORRECTED NOTICE OF CHANGE OF LAND USE
The St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency (LP.A.) proposes to change the
use of land within the area shown on the map in th~s advertisement.
A public hearing on the proposal will be held on Wednesday April 30, 1986 at 7:00
P.M. in Room 101, St. Lucie CounW Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue,
Fort Pierce and on Thursday May'l, 1986 at 7:00 P.M. in Room 101, St. Lucie Coun-
ty Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce.
Please refer to the schedule below for the specific hearing date for each petition.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 30, 1986
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (CITIZENS COALITION)
from IH (Industrial Heavy) to RM (Residential Medium): Located Approximately 650
feet South of Edwards Road Bounded on the South by Ten mile creek, Bounded by
Five Mite Creek on the 'east and by Lewis Street and Ten mile creek to the west,
CHARLES INFANTE
from RL (Residential, Low) to CG [Commercial General): Located at the northeast cor-
ner of Kings Highway (SR 713) and Indrio Road.
ELDEN R. AND ELEANOR I. JENKINS:
from RL {Residential Low) to CG {Commercial, General) Located at the northeast cor-
ner of Kings Highway (SR 713) and Indrio Road.
THOMAS J, E~ HELENE ZAYDON;
from SU {Semi Urban) to IL (Industrial Light) located at the northeast corner of Kings
Highway (SR 7131 and St. Lucie Blvd..
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS {J. STAMM): ,
from CG (Commercial General) and RL (Residential Low) to IL {Industrial Light) located
on the north side of Orange Avenue Approximately ~ mile west of Har.ztman Road.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS [U-VISTA COURT)
from CG (Commercial General) to RM [Residential Medium) located south side of~
Orange Avenue Approximately 1/8 mile east of Jenkins Road.
LEO F. BAILEY: - --
from SU (Semi-Urban) to RL (Residential, Low) located at 115,16 Okeechobee Road.
THURSDAY, MAY i, 1986
CHESTER B. GRIFFIN AND RICHARD V. NEILL:
from RL {Residential Low) to X (interchange): located between 1-95 and Peters Road,
south from Graham Road.
CALLAWAY LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY: from SU (Semi Urban) to RL (Residen-
rial, Low) located south side of Reserve Blvd.
JULIA ECONOMYS:
from RL (Residential, Low) and CG (CommerciaI: 'General) to RM (Residential,
Medium): Ioc~ated between South U.S. 1 and Oleander Avenue, approximately 600 ft.
north of West Midway Road.
NEAL KEYS:
from RL (Residential Low) to CG (Commercial General): located at the southwest cor-
ner of South U~S. 1 at Seager Avenue.
WYNNE BUILDING CORP:
from RL (Residential Low} to CT (Commercial Tourst): located Southeast corner of
South U.S. I at North Mediterranean Blvd.
WYNNE BUILDING
from RL IRes[dential, Low) to CG (Commercial, General) located east of South U.S.1
between North and South Mediterranean Blvds.
j' ':
- NOTICE OF CHANe OF
~ St. Lucae Counw Lo~ Planning Agen~ (L,P.A.) prop--s to ~ge the
~ of land witch ~e ems ~ on the map in ~ ~v~ement.
A public hearing on the ~op~i ~ be held ~ Wedn~d~ Ap~I ~, 1~ at 7:~
~ Admini~afion Buil~g, ~ Virginia Argue, Fo~ P~.
P~ase refer to the ~h~ule ~!~ for the s~ific hea~g d~ for ~ch p~.
EDNESDAY 1986
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (CITIZENS~ALITION)
from IH (Industrial Heaw) to RM (R~dentJal Medium). Lo~t d
f~t So : . e APproxJmatel
~ ..... ~ of. Edwards Roed Bounded on the South b~ Te mile er~
r~ve l~ue ~me~ o~ the ~ and by Lewis S~eet and Ten ~ite ~r~-~
CHARLES INFANTE
from RL (Residenzial, Low) to CG {commemial General): Located at the no~heast cor-
ner of Kin~s Highway (SR 713) and Ind~o Road. -
from RL {R~idential Low) ~ C~om~ercial. General) Lo.ted at the hUSh.st
of K~ngs Highway {SR 713) a~ Indrio Road. cornet
THOMAS J. 8 HELENE ZAYDON;
from SU (Semi Urban) to IL (Industrial Ught) I~ated at the no.beast corher of Kin~
H~ghway (SR 713) snd St. Lucie Blvd,.
8OARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~J. STAMM):
.,,~ .u~u ~u~ o~ ~nge Averl~e ApDrox~m~e/y ~ mJ~e we~ O~oad'
BOARD OF COON~ COMMISSIONERS {~-VtSTA COURT)
from CG (Commercial Genera~.to RM (Residential Medium) located ~uth ~de of
Orange Aven~e Approximately I/8 mile ea~ of Jenkins Road. ~
LEO F. BAILEY:
from S O (Semi-~ than) to R L { Residential. ~Low) lo~t~ at 11516 Okeecho~ ~oad.
THURSDAY, Z, 1986
CHESTER B. GRIFFIN AND RICHARD V. NEILL:
~uthfr°m RL~o~oad,{R~l Low)to X (Interchange): located be~n !-95 and Peters Road,
CAL~WAY LAND AND CABLE COMPANY: from SU,.{Semi'U~} to RL {~siden-
~1, Iow} loca~d ~uth side of Rese~e 81vd.
JULIA ECONOMYS: · .
~mm RL {R~idential, I~) ~d. CG {CommerciaI, Geneml)'to RM {R~ntml
cared be~n south U S 1 a~ Olea * ' '. , mi:
N~L KEYS:
~om RL (R~identJal Iow) to CG (~mmercial General): loceted at th~ou~We~ cmner
of Sou~h U.S. I ~ Seeger A~nue. -
~NNE BUILDING COPR: "
~m RL (R~i~nflal I~) to CT (Com~cial Tou~): I~ed ~uthea~ ~m~ of
South U,S, 1 at No~ MedJt~n
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
April 30, 1986 and May 1, 1986
PUBLIC HEARINGs
Petition ofJulia Economys, as Trustee of the Helen Politis
Revocable Trust, to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St.
Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from RL (Residential,
Low) to R~ (Residential, Medium) for property located between
South U. S. %1 and Oleander Avenue, and north of West Midway
Road.
MEMORANDUMf On January 23, 1986, this Agency sitting
as the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission
heard a request on behalf of Julia Economys to ~mend
the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan from RL to RM for property locat-
ed between South U. S. %1 and 0leander Avenue, and~ north
of West Midway Road. At that time, the Commission voted
5 to 3 to recommend approval of this petition.
As this Body may recall, at the January 23, 1986 meeting,
there was considerable discussion about this petition.
M~st of the concerns expressed were concentrated in the-
areas of drainage and roadways. I-would, at this time,
remind this Agency that these items are valid c~nsider-
ations when deciding the merits of this proposal. How-
ever, I would advise you not to become too concerned
with the intricate details of these matters at this
point. The ~stions you should be asking yourself are,
is the requested use appropriate for the area and can
the issues of drainage, roads, and water/sewer service
be adequately addressed without ~do adverse impact on
the existing neighborhood~ County Staff is of the
opinion that this request is acceptable under the poli-
cies of the Growth Management Policy Plan, and that the
items of roads, drainage, and water/sewer service can
be adequately addressed. Therefore, Staff urges you to
again forward a recommendation of approval to the Board
of County Commissioners.
(For further clarification, please refer to the minutes
of the January 23, 1986 meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Commission).
Mr. Sciturro asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of
this petition.
Mr. Bruce Abernethy, Esq. of the law firm of Neill, Griffin,
Jeffries and Lloyd, addressed the Board, saying:
I am appearing here this evening on behalf of Julia
Economys, who is owner of the tract of land subject
to two petitions this evening.
Mr. and Mrs. Economys are present in the audience tonight,
and Mr. Jack Scott, who is the Architect for this project,
is also present.
-4-
I ho~e you all have had the opportUnity to review
the minutes of the January 23, 1986 meeting. I
will be happy to answer any questions yo~ have re-
garding what~was said at that meeting. ~
The conceptual plan prepared by Mr. Scott is on the
easel before you.
I would like to point out that there were no negative
comments concerning this petition, from either the
Department of Community Affairs or the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council.
We feel new and compelling evidence favorable to this
petition, is the proposal to Widen Midway Road to four
lanes, from U. S. ~1 to Oleander Avenue by 1987, and
from Oleander Avenue to South 25 Street by 1988. We
think this will aid the flow of traffic from the pro-
posed project. I would also like to point out that
the Economyq also own property which extends to U. S.
~1, which will also ai~ in the flow of traffic.
I would lik9 ~o,reserve some rebuttal time to respond
to any.new evidence which may be presented to this
Board in opposition to the' petitions.
Mrs. Ferrick wanted to know if there were any existing
businesses on th~ portion of property currently zoned commercial.
Mr. Abe~nethy said that there was a very small used car lot
on ~hat portion 9f the.property at the present time. However,
it is not compatible with the proposed project, and it would not
be allowed to stay there.
Mrs. Fawsett wanted to know if the density of the CG (Com-
mercial, General) zoned portion of the property was being in-
cluded in the overall density of the proposed project.
Mr. Abernethy deferred to Mr. Jack Scott, who said no, it
WaS not.
Mr. Sciturro asked what the time frame Was for construction
'e
of the proposed pro3 ct.
Mr. Abernethy said, "As soon as it is approved, as the owners
are ready to develop this property."
Mr. Sciturro asked Dennis Murphy for confirmation that Midway
Road would be widened to four lanes, from U. S. ~1 to 0leander
Avenue by 1987.
Mr. Murphy said he wasn't sure of the specific dates involv-
ed, but within the next 3 to 5 years, Midway Road is proposed to
be improved to a four-lane section from U. S. ~1, west to 25th
Street. It will be done in segments; the first high priority
segment is the one between U. S. ~1 and Oleander Avenue. The
County has to acquire right-of-way, and design time must be con-
sidered. 1987 may~be a littletoo early, but it won't be much
beyond that.
Many of the same concerns expressed by some members of the
Board at this meeting, were the same concerns expressed at the
meeting of January' 23, 1986.
Mr. Sciturro asked if there was any opposition to the peti-
tion.
Mr. Herbert Beach, President of the White City Improvement
Club, Mrs. Arlene Goodman, F. H. Conrad, Jr. and Mrs. Nancy Smith
all spoke in opposition to the petition, eXpressing grave concern
with regard to the proposed multi-family housing development,
citing in particular the potential heavy traffic congestion; the
hazards in trying to evacuate so many people in the event of a
nuclear disaster; serious flooding and drainage problems; little
or no privacy for the residents of the area, and a density that
-5-
is too high to be compatible with the surrounding residential
area.
Mr. Sciturro declared a five minute recess.
Mr. Wetherington left the meeting, and did not return.
After the five minute recess, the meeting resumed.
As no one else came forward to speak in opposition to the
petition, Mr. Sciturro closed the meeting to the public.
Mr. Carman made a motion to apDrove the petition. The motion
was seconded by Mr. TerPening. Upon roll call, Mr. Sciturro,
Mr. Carman and Mr. ~rpening voted in favor of the petition; and
Mrs. Fawsett, Mrs. and Mrs. Ferrick voted against the peti-
tion.
~r. Sciturro said ~ha~_on_the_basis of the ti? vote, the
petition would be sent to the Board of County Commissioners with
a recommendation of denial.
PLANNING ANDZONING COMMISSION
JANUARY 23, 1986
PUBLIC HEARING:
Petition of Julia Economys as Trustee of the Nelen'Politis
Revocable Trust, to amend the future land use classification of
the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from CG
(Commercial, General) and RL (Low Density Residential Development)
to RM (Medium Density Residential Development) for property located
on the east side of Oleander Avenue between Midway Road and
Weatherbee Road.
Attorney Bruce Abernethy appeared to represent the petition.
He showed the location of the project on the zoning map and said
they are planning a 432 unit apartment and condo complex at a
density of 9.9 units per acre. He stated Mr. Economys and Mr.
Richard Stebbins, architect for the project were present and would
answer any questions.
Mr. Richard Stebbins came forward to present the conceptual
site plan. He said they are proposing 12 two story buildings on
43 acres. They will be U shaped with parking in the center.
this would allow for a buffer around the entire area. Entrance
to the project would be from U.S. # 1 and Olenader Avenue, with
egress to Town South Center. Most of the native~ foliage would be
left and there would be retention ponds on the property.
Mr. Abernethy said one very important factor is the rezoning
does not include all of the land owned by the petitioner. They
also own Parcel # 61, which is zoned Commercial, General, it has
U.S # 1 frontage and will be used for ingress and egress to the
project This would aleviate most of the pressure on Oleander
Avenue. He said they felt they have a very postive traffic flow
pattern through the project. The project has received very.
favorable comments from the Planning Staff. Possibly because
the entire area is developing at very high intensity uses. There
is RM to the north, churches on two corners zoned Institutional,
Commercial, General on U.S. # 1 and a Mobile Nome park to the
northeast. There is some residential on Midway and Oleander.
City water and sewer is on site and a fire station close by.
The project will be buffered and isolated for tlhe surrounding
areas.
Mr. Sciturro asked Mr. Abernethy if they planned to use
all of their U.S. # 1 frontage for ingress and egress. Mr.
Abernethy said they have 250 ft. frontage on U.S. # 1, they
will use 60 ft. along the northern boundary for the entrance.
-17-
Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Abernethy if his project intended to
annex into the city and Mr. Abernethy said not at this time.
Mrs. Ferrick questioned Mr. Abernethy about the ingress to
Town South, she.said it appeared retention ponds were located
in the same area.
Mrs. Fawsett asked Mr. Abernethy what would prevent these
roads from becoming a race track. Mr. Abernethy suggested they
might use traffic bumps.
Mrs. Ferrick also remarked that on the conceptual.drawing
the swimming pool and recreation center would be very close to
a residence on Oleander Avenue.
A letter expressing their approval of the project from
Town South Plaza was noted by Mr. Sciturro.
Mrs. Arlene Goodman appeared to speak in opposition for a
group of White City residents. She also presented letters of
opposition from Mr. Arthur Niemoeller, Mr. and Mrs. William
Nelson, Mr. Ed Hill and a message for Mr. Fred Ley. Mrs.
Goodman expressed concern about drainage problems in White City,
flooding during the last rain storm and the fact that White City
has always been residential, mostly single family, and they
want it to stay that way. She quoted from several newspaper
articles. She said Mr. Economys knew what the property was zoned
when he purchased it.
Mr. Herb Beech, President of the White City Improvement Club,
expressed concern that people would use Oleander Avenue for ingress
and egress to Town South Plaza by way of this project. He said
they were trying to create a nightmare by putting all of those
units in an area that was flooded when Merritt Creek overflowed
from the heavy rains. He said water was in the houses along
Oleander Avenue and when more vetation is removed to build this
project, there will be no place at all for the water to go except
back into the peoples houses. As to the fire station mentioned
earlier, Mr. Beech said ther are only five men on duty there.
There is one fire truck and one rescue truck. If one or the other
of them is out on a call only one or two men would be left in the
fire station, that offers very little protection for this project
or White City, he said. He said he felt this was very wrong and
asked the Board not to allow this to happen.
Mr. Terpening said the rains referred to were very unseasonable
rains. If we throw out every petition where land.was flooded~ it
would include about 85% of St. Lucie County.
Buck Bucklen of 4906 Elm spoke in opposition to the petition.
He said he just purchased his house, it is over 60 years old.
He was under the impression White City would remain as it always
has been. He said he is not against people moving into the area.
He also owns a business on U..S. # 1 and Midway and since he has
been there three people have been killed there. When we had the
floods Mr. Bucklen continued, the retention ponds in Town South
Plaza overflowed and flooded Oleander and Elm Avenue and they cut
down the old oaks that were over 100 years old and it is really
making a mess, now to build condos there is just too much. He
said he was against it.
Mrs. Nancy Smith spoke in opposition ot the petition, She
said she lives next to Institutional zoning that has retention
ponds and they have never been dry. During' the last heavy rains
they overflowed 'with two and three feet of water over her yard
and her mother-in-laws yard that never had flooded before. She
said as it was explained to her, White City is in a low spot.
The land is high on Indian River Drive and sloops until it gets
to St. Lucie River. She said she has been in her house four
years and has never seen the ditches cleaned out.
Mr. Goodman said the house she lives in does not come up to
the crest of the road and if this gentleman is going to build
his condos 18 inches above the crest of the road, everyone else
on oleander Av'~nue will be flOoded. Sh~' said she worked for 'a-
contractor at one time and retention ponds don't mean anything.
-18-
Mr. Sciturro said Hawley Road certainly was flooded with
two and one-half feet of water.
Mr. F. H. Conrad spoke in opposition to the petition. He
said he lives on South Indian River Drive and it takes him 1/2
hour longer to get tO work, the traffic is backed up 1/4 to 1/2
mile since they put all the turn lanes at Midway and U.S. # 1.
As for the water situation, he said he andhis wife grew up in White City.
and have seen the water over Midway road and the old w60den
bridge at t'he park many times. Since they put that shopping
center in that low hole and filled it up and the water runs
into what you are calling Merritt Creek. It is just a ditch
Old Man Merritt dug, he said he watched him dig it, the ditch is
not large enough to take care of all the water from that parking
lot, it overflowed and flooded Merritt Monument. If they clear
off more land and put in another place, Mrs. Rick's house on
Oleander will have two feet of water in it instead of one foot
it had last time. The traffic and the water are both bad situations
and retention ponds just do not do the job.
Mr. Terpening said they are attempting to correct the traffic
situation at Midway and U.S. # 1.
Mr. Edward June of 4700 Oleander Avenue asked if they were
going to tie into the sewer line and if it was adequate.
Mr. Carman said they have already contacted the utilities
department and it will be more than adequate.
Mr. June wanted to know where the excess water is going to
go.from the retention ponds.
Mr. Carman said this Board isnot here to solve drainage problems.
That will come up at Site Plan. That is not within the preview of
this Board tonight. It really does not concern us.
Mr. Murphy said this Board is only to be concerned with the
merits of this project. Specific questions regarding traffic,
drainage and everything else will come up if and when a Site Plan
is submitted.
Mr. Abernethy said one cannot forget the importance of Site
Plan to handle drainage problems. Staff and this Board has been
made aware of this problem and the developers will have to address
it. Mrs. Goodman said GMPP was adopted two years ago and it
shouldn't be changed, Mr. Abernethy said, that is the purpose
of this Board,' to permit the flexibility in GMPP and zoning. Mrs.
Goodman also made the statement White City is all single family
residential, Mr. Abernethy said this is not the case, there is a
major shopping center and some very large car dealersadjacent to
this property. The Board also needs to recognize the fact that
they have ingress and egress off U. S. # 1 and Oleander, there
is no Midway access. The question of fire service that has been
raised will be addressed at Site Plan.
Mr. Carman made a motion to approve the petition and Mr.
Terpening seconded it.
Mrs. Fawsett said she was afraid she would have to vote
against the petition. She thought it was far too high a density
in this area. There may be high density along U.S. #1 but there
are many single family homes in the area and she did not think
they needed that high density in the area.
Mr. Wetherington said he called some of the neighbors he
knew in the area and asked about their feelings on the petition.
It is unfortunate the White City Improvement Club objects to
most every thing. When Mrs. Goodman came up for her petition,
thms same group opposed her. The people he talked to were not in
opposition, he said, and he favored the petition.
-19-
Mrs. Goodman said the people she talked to in the area
were not in favor of this petition. As far ,as ingress and
egress, she said the people that want to go south will use U.S. # 1
but the people who want to go north will use Oleander Avenue.
Mr. Carman asked Mr. Sciturro to proceed with thefvote.
Upon vote the petition was approved with Mr. Carman, Mr.
Terpening, Mrs. King, Mr. Me~er and Mr. Wetherington voting in
favor of the petition. Mrs. Fawsett, Mrs. Ferrick and Mr.
Sciturro voted against approval.
Petition #24
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Planning Administrator ~
January 20, 1986
Petition of Julia Economys, as Trustee of the
Helen Politis Revocable Trust, to amend the
Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County
Growth Management Policy Plan from RL
(Residential, Low) to RM (Residential, Medium)
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
EXISTING G.M.P.P. LAND USE:
PROPOSED G.M.P.Po LAND USE:
PROPOSED USE:
PARCEL SIZE:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
FIRE PROTECTION:
The subject parcel is located
between South U.S. #1 on the
east, Oleander Avenue on the
west, and the Town South Plaza
Shopping-Center on the south.
RS-3 (Residential, Single
Family - 3 d.u./acre)
RL (Residential, Low)
RM (Residential, Medium)
The petitioner wishes to
construct a 432 unit
apartment/condominium complex.
43.61 acres
RS-3, RMH-5, RM-11, I, CO, and
CG
Properties to the east and
southeast are generally being
used for commercial purposes.
To the north and west are
single family homes. There is
a church southeast of the site
and a synagogue is at the
northwest corner of the site.
White City Fire Station is
approximately one mile away..
WATER/SEWER SERVICES:
The petitioner proposes to ex-
tend public water/sewer lines
to this site.
COMMENTS: The petitioner has submitted a Conceptual Land
Development Plan for this site. This plan indicates that it is
possible to fit approximately 430 multi-family residential, units
on this site. Staff would again point out, for both this
Commission and the public benefit, that this conceptual plan is
not final, and that prior to the issuance of any building
permits, a complete detailed site plan must be approYe4 by the
Board of County Commissioners. At that time, the specifics of
traffic impact and drainage will be examined in complete detail.
Upon approval of this petition by the B~ard of
Commissioners, it is highly recommended that the petitioner
contact the Staff's Environmental and Long Rankle Planners prior
to any detailed design of the site. The reasons for this are:
1.) Staff's preliminary review indicates on-site,
natural drainage-ways, hammocks, and other vegetative ground
cover which have the potential for incorporation into the site's
stormwater and recreation/open space systems.
2.) Staff's desire to encourage and assist the
developer to preserve and utilize said natural features in
conjunction with building layout and design.
County Staff, in reviewing this petition, has
found that the concept is consistent with the Growth Management
Policy Plan. County Staff has no objections to this petition and
recommends its approval.
cc:
County Attorney
Robert M. Lloyd
AGENDA -'PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
THURSDAY
JANUARY 23, 1986
7:00 P. M.
Petition of Julia Economys as Trustee of the Helen Polit~s
Revocable Trust, to amend the future land use classification
of the St. LUcie County Growth Management Policy Plan from CG
(Commercial, General) and RL (Low Density Residential Development)
to RM (Medium Density Residential Development) for the following
described property: _
(See attached legal)
Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and
Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. Any person who
decides to appeal any action taken by the Planning and Zoning
Commission at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings
and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record
of the proceedings is made.
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent
to all adjacent property owners.
PARCEL A: Change Land Use from RL to RM
3 36 40 BEG 963 FT E & 715.5FT N OF SW COR OF NW %;, RUN E 4?7. FT,TH N 660
FT,TH W .~[~ FT,TH S 660 FT TO POB (7.23 AC)
AND
3 36 40 BEG 485 FT E & 715.5 FT N OF SW COR OF NW ¼, RUN E 479 FT,TH N 660
FT,TH W 478 FT,TH S 660 FT TO POB (7.25 AC)
AND
WHITE CITY S/D 03 36 40 E ½ OF LOT 9 (9.02 AC)!
AND
WHITE CITY $/D 03 36 40 LOT 10~-
AND
WHITE CITY S/D 03 36 40 S 188 FT OF N 485 FT OF LOT 2f~-~LESS S 108 FT OF.W
165 FT- (1.69 AC) '
AND
WHITE CITY S/D 03 36 40 THAT PART OF LOT 21 LYG N OF MIDWAY RD-LESS S 647
FT & LESS MIDWAY RD R/W- (7.55 AC)'~
PARCEL B: Change Land Use from CG to RM
Commencing at a point 600 feet West and 225 feet South of the NE corner of
Lot~ll, White. City, a subdivision of Section 3, Township 36"South, Range 40
East, as reco~rded in Pl~a~Book 1, Page 23 of the Public Records of St. Lucie
County, Florida, for a point of beginning, thence run North 225 feet to a
point on the North line of~ said Lot 11; thence run West 60 feet more or less
to the Northeast cor~er of Lot 10 of said White City Subdivision; thence run
South along the East line of said Lot 10 225 feet to a point: themce run East
60 feet more or less to the point of beginning.
RL
RM
CG
BLUE
GREEN
RED
PARCEL A
N
3-36-40
C
PETITION OF J~IA EC~S', AS T~TEE.~~ T~
HELEN POLITIS REVOCABLE TROT,
BY AGENTS: NEILL, &
TO CHANGE FUTURE LaNI) USE CL~IFiCATI~
OF PARCEL A FROM RL TO RM
& PARCEL B FROH CG TO RM ·
16, 1~I
To ~
Edward Hill
4711 Oleander Ave.
Ft. Pierce.~ F'la.
[)ate: ~.;~.~ ,'~..~ y .z..::,.~ i986
..... e~, ~u=, Avenue and
South U.S. One just north of Midway Road.
i am opposect to the zorting change for the following reasons:
i. The drainage ditch for' the southern part of that property
has not been cleaned out from Elm Ave. West to the St~
Lucie River in more than 17 years. Twzce during the last
three or four years the water has exceeded the capacity of
the drainage 'ditch to the extent that water was flowing
over 0'~ eander Avenue conti nUOL~sl y for more +.~..-,.-...,,~,, z~.~ no~u-' '"~ ..... ~.
Because of ....... .~ill re,~ ~' · .......... ~'"'~ "'" ( ..... ~ ................ ~he
=~.t~., parking a;'"eas~ and the existing iow
areas which will be filled, there will be ev~mn more water
for the drainage ditch to handle.
The addition of 432 housing units will consideF'ahly
increase the number o.~ vehicles entering Oleander Avenue.
With traffic exits on Oleander Avenue and U.S. ~, most
...... ~-, ~ Oleander Avenue ex~+ .............. ~ S
busy. The exit oil OleaF~der AveFH.~e is F~ear my driveway.
Every one else ~ n thi~= area is ~-=~.-~.- .: .... ~ .....
...... i ~ ..... r.~ ....~.-d to single
fa~'fiJ, ly housino therefore I do r'iot ~--" '
-, u~,.~eive thzs exception
=~c~uld be made by, changs,,~(~ the exist~.,~ zoning.