The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCarpenter, WilliamBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION(ERS January 19, 1987 D( V6LOPM6NT COORDINATOR J. GARY AMENT Mr. William E. Carpenter P. o. Box 1096 Palm City, Florida 33490 Dear Mr. Carpenter: Please be advised that on Wednesday, December 17. 1 . of Count Comm' ' . ~ . . . 986. the Board Y lssloners denle ~ ' · ~_~ ........... ~ your petition to amend the ~a~u use ~±assz~zcatlon set f~rth in eh= e+ ~.--:- - · i ~ ~u. ~uume uoun~ ~row ~n~emen~ P?llcy' Plan from RL!i (Low Densit,,~ ~,~o~.u~j~~-~:-~'Y-To ~M--th side{~ealUmof S6nriseDensmty Blvd. Residential) fior~ propert~ located on the East approximately 1600 south of Bell Avenue.) A copy of the recorded Resolution No. 86-312 is enclosed for your information. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Jim Minix, Chairman JM/sr Enclosure cc: Daniel Sugg .d.d HAVERT L. FENN, District No. t · E. E. GREEN. District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. D,4J.E TREFELNER, District NO. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5 County Administroror- WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Coordinator: Ext. 398 ·~ Building: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 317 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Krista A. Storey Heather Young COUNTY A'n'ORN6Y Daniel S. MC Intyre ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY ASSISTANT COUNTY A]'[ORNEY Sharon Phillips Brennan ASSISTANT COUNTY A'I'[ORNEY January 13, 1987 Department of Community Affairs 2571 Executive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Gentlemen: Re: Ordinances adopted by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Please find enclosed certified copies of the following Ordinances and resolutions adopted on December 17 and 18, 1986, concerning amendments or denial of amendments to the Growth Management Policy Plan for St. Lucie County: Ordinance No. 86-42 Ordinance No. 86-43 Ordinance No. 86-83 Ordinance No. 86-84 Ordina.~ce No. 86-88 /Resolution No. 86-312 If you require any additional information, please let me k n ow. DSM/sl s Sincelrel~;, ..7, ,~- ~ Daniel' S./ MC~n~yr/e County Atto~/ Enclosure HAVERT L. FENN, District No I · JUDY CULPF_PPER. District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, 'District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX. District No. 5 CountY Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce. FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Ext. 214 RL IL R,M BLUE GREEN ORANG'E A PETITION OF WILL~^M E~ CARPENTER BY AGENT: ~ANIEL SUGG TO CHANGE FUTURE L^ND USE CLASSIFIC^TION FROM RL TO RM RM-11 RS-3 R,S-2 IL I- ORANGE BLUE PURPLE 6REEN RED PETITION OF WILLIAM E, CARPE-NTER BY AGENT: DANIEL SUGG TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION P~ROM RL TO RM BOARD OF ~OUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST.- LOC'~IE COUN'~Y,_ FLORZDA - SPECIAL MEETING Date: December 17, 1986 "~ coqvened: 7:02 p.m. Tapes: ~1 - #5 adjourned: 2:55 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman Jim Minix, Vice Chairman Jack Krieger, Havert L, Fenn, 3udy Cuipepper, R. Daie TrefeZner Others Present: Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney, J. Gary Ament, Community Development Coordinator, 'Gary SchindIer, Pianning Administrator, Theresse du 8ouchet, DePuty Clerk · PETITION OF WILLIAM E. ,CARPENTER FOR A CHANGE IN LAND USE 5 FRON RL-T~"~R~i {~-02~'~) .......... Attorney Rick Farrell appeared before the Bgard on behalf of petitioner and requested Board a~prO~al of the proposed change in land use. · -. There appeared the following ,tndi¥iduals who sPoke in opposition to the proposed change in la~~ use -' ....... g~- ~ infringement on ~tn.nl, . ~ p~ooi~ms,..., increased character of neighborhood: ~_~,~ .... nodes{ ~nc~mpa~ibilit ' ~ ~S --.mlW bu.~ao and John Denmark· Based on the recommendations of the Local Planning Agency,~ the Planning and Zoning Commission, the comments of area residents, and the reCommendation of Staff, it was moved by Com. Fenn, seconded by COm. Trefelner, to deny the Petition of William E. unanimouslyCarpenter for carried·a change in land use',~ and, upon roll call, motion MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: County Administrator County Commission Planning Administrator,S// December Il, 1986 Petition o~ William E. Ca~rpenter (by Agent, Daniel Sugg) to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucia County Growth Management Rolicy Plan from RL (Low Density Residential) to RM (Medium Density Residential) On Wednesday, December 17, 1986, you will be asked to review a petition on behalf Of William E. Carpenter (by Agent, Daniel Sugg) to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucia County Growth Management Policy Rlan from RL to RM. This petition was presented to the St. Lucia County Local Planning Agency for review on December R, 1R86, at which time, this Agency voted 6 to 0 to recommend denial of this petition. As required under Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, County Staff has transmitted this amendment request to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for interagency review. In reviewing this petition, the Department voiced some concern over the compatibility of this proposal with the Residential and Agricultural Development Policies of the Growth Management Rolicy Plan. On September 22, 19~6, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council reported that this proposed amendment did not conflict with any regional plan or policy. Attacheo for your review, is a copy of the original staff comments on this petition, transmitted to you on August 1, 1986, and the most recent memoranqum transmitted to the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency on December 2, 1R86. By separate memorandum, the County Attorqey,s Office will be providing for petition,your review 'a Draft Ordinance granting approval to this December 11, 1986 Petition: William Carpenter Page 2 I If you have any questiens on t~is petition, please let me know. GMS/DOM/mg CARPENT2(B3) cc: County Attorney WiiIiam Carpenter DanieI Sugg Commision Secretary Press/PubIic WEDNESDAY AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 17, 1986 7=00 P.M. Petition of. William L. Carpenter, by Agent= Daniel Sugg, to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from RL (Low Density Residential Development) to RH (Medium Density Residential Development) for the following described property= I~eW~"of CbeSFJ~ of the NB~, less I acre, lying West of k"flt~e City Road, (Sunrise Blvd.) and less chat parc ly/ng South of Pla=cs Branch, containing 14 acres more or'less; and cha~ part of ~he Sk~ of the NETS, lying North and EasC o£_~ht~e 'Ctiy Road (Sunrise Blvd.); all lying and being in gec.330 Township 35South and Range 40 East, S~. Lucte County, Florida. SubJec~ to all rights-el-way for drainage canals and public roads. ~. (Location: East side of Sunrise Blvd. approximately 1600' south of Bell Avenue.) ~ Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same ~was sent to all adjacent property owners. If it bec6mes necessary, ~hese public hearings may be ~continu~d from..time to time. Please note' that a,ll proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are e]'ectronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board of County C°mmissione~s at this meetin, g will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings · s made. BOARD OF-COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /s/ Jim Minix, Chairman ~NO R A N O U M TO: Local Planning Agency ~. FROM: Planning Admlnlstrator~/~ DATE: December 2, 1986 SUBmECT: Petitlon Willlam E. Carpenter (by agent Danlel Sugg) to amend the Future Land Use Maps of The St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from RL (Low Density Residential) to RM (Medium Density ResiOential) On August 7, 1986, the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearlng for the purpose of authorizing the t=ansmlttal of this petition to the Florida Department oF Community Affai=s as requlred under Chapter 163.3184, Florida Statute. As of this date, my office has not received~..any return comments from theDepartment about this Petition. On September 22, 1986, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council held a hearing on the proposed petition, and reported that the.proposal DiG not conflict with any adopted Council plans ,or policies. AttacheOyou will find a copy of the orlglnal staff report on this matter. County staff has no objections to this petition and recommmends its approval. GMS/DiM/mc CARPENTI(B~) cc: County Attorney William Carpenter Daniel Sugg Petition TO: FROM- DATE: SUBJECT: County Administrator County Commission Planning Administrato~ August 1, 1986 Petition of William E. Carpenter (by agent Daniel Sugg) to Amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County growth Management Policy Plan from RL (Residential, Low) to RM (Residential, Medium)· LOCATION=.. EXISTING ZONING: " EXISTING G.N.P.P. PROPOSED G.N.P.P.: PROPOSED USE:: P'ARC~EL SIZE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE= FIRE PROTECTION:. #ATER/SENER SERVICE: East side of Sunrise Boulevard, approximately 1,600 feet south of Bell Avenue. RS-3 (Residential, Single Family - 3 d.u./ac) EL (Residential, Low) RM (Residential, MediUm) The Petitioner p~oposes to develop approximately 130 units on this site. 23.1 acres IL, RM-11, RS-3, RS-2, and Z P~operttes to the east and west are undeveloped o~ vacant. To the south are areas of single family homes, average lot size 1/3 to 1/2 acre. Ft. Pierce Central Fire Station is approximately 3 1/2 miles away. To be provided by Ft. Pierce Utilities.* Carpente~ Petition August 1, 1986 ACO#HEN. TS_: On 3uly 2~, 1966, th~ St. Lucie Count Loca P · gency neld a public hearino [on this n~_ft~nn ;~ .;_~ . 1 lannzng was considerable nubiic ~-~ ~..~-~S ..... ~c .~nzs hea~ing, the~e been submitted fo~ ~eview. This plan in P~o~ect of app~oximatel~ 1~0 units ma~ dicates a muiti-famiI7 be possible on this site. P~ima~ among the comments a~d concerns of the ~esidents of this a~ea was the t~pe of housing contemplated fo~ this site. The sub~ect p~ope~ty is located at the northeast co~ne~ of Platts 8~anch C~eek and Suq~ise 8ouleva~d. The site is a fo~me~ citrus g~ove backing up to industrially zoned p~ope~ty and institutional uses along Oleande~ Avenue. Approximately 1/~ of this site lie~ within the lO0 ~ea~ Flood Plain. Count~ Staff is of the opinion t'~at th~-p~oposed Land-Use Amendment is acceptable bnde~ t~e '~eveiopment policies of the 9~owth Management Poiic~ Plan fo-~ the following ~easons: 1'. .... As cited, a portion of the subject p~ope~t~ lies within the 100 ~ea~ Flood Plain. -With this fact established as development P~oceeds on this p~ope~ty, all Flood Plailn 'management ~equi~ements of the South -~ Florida Wate~ Management District and Federal Eme~genc~ . Management Agency must be met. P~ope~ties located within the FlOo~ Plain a~e not always impossible to ,utilize given adherence to applicable ~eguiations. 2. The ~equested increase in Land Use densit~ affords the p~ope~t~ ow-ne~ the abilit~ to pursue innovative and c~eative sit-e ~.esign options through the County'S Planned Unit Development p~ocess, given the subject p~ope~ties location and physical characteristics, the onl~ multi-famil~ zonin9 classification Count~ Staff could support is the P.U.D. ~e~ignation. ' The petitione~ is not seeking a ~ezonin9 o~ ~develo ment approval at this time. P ~. The P~oposed petition offers the possibilit~ fo~ a t'~ansitlon of use between the.mo~e intense uses along Oleande~ Avenue and the low intensit~ uses fa~the~ south-along Sunrise Boulevard. , 4. The sub3ect is within ~each of u~ban se~vlces, wate~ and sewe~.. Specific construction feasabilit~ can be explo~ed at the time of development ~evlew. Ca=pente Petiton August l! 1986 trips/da, d.u./ac," As indic generate generate above, is po.ssi -develope~ to offsel One of the items discussed at this meeting was the projected impact a project Of this nature would have on this area's road network. As a requirement of development approval, the developer of this site would be required to complete a Traffic Impact Analysis Report. The most current information available for this area indicates that, with the possible need fo= some safety improvements at selecte, d intersections in this area, all road links are operational at accept'ab~ :e levels. The estimated impact of this site, if developed at maximum sin91e family capacity, would be approximatel 1 000 ,. If this site wereldeveioped at it's ma~im,,m n~o~+~ ~'~ ,, t.he.estimated impact would-be app=oximat-e"~'" 2~"~s~'da~~. ~eo on the conceptual development plan, this project wOuld approximately 845 trips/day. Its present zoning would 727 trips/day. Given the characteristics of this site ~:ited : is. extremely unlikely that maximum development of this site hie.' Should any-deyelopment take place on this site, the shall be responsible to provide all necessary improvements this. impact. 'on'~.3uly 2~, 1986, the Local Plannin9 Agency voted ?-0 to recommend denial of this petition. County Attorney William Carpenter Oan~el Su99 Press/Public R$-~ RS-2 IL 1. ORA~E I~LUE PURPLE GREEN REO A 'PETITION OF WILLIAF1 E. CARPENTER BY AGENT: ])ANIEL SUGG TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FROI'I RL TO RFI 35_40 :RI. IL ~UE oR'~IG£ 33- A mY 35-4 TO PETITION OF WILLIA~ E. CARPENTER ~)Y AG~T: DANIEL SUGG CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FROR RL TO RR ~tlltam E. Carpenter P.O. ~ox 1096 Palm City, Fl. 33490 Parcel 3 ~ill~ h Beth Childs 3805 Smrtse Blvd. Ft. Pierce, Fl~ 33482 Daniel Sugg 750 ~.E. Com~rcial St, Jenseu Bch., Fl. 33452 I OTHER P--OPERT~ O~ERS ~OTIFIED Parcel I 4 ~Corp~ c/o Donald Wheeler Rt. 3, Box 3492 ~elroae,,Fl..-32666 Parcel Int. Imp. Fund of Florida St. of Fl. D.O.T . 202 Blouse SC. Tallabaasee, Fi. 32304 Parcels Reginald & Ida Childs 3803 Sunrise Blvd. FT. Pierce, Fl. 33482i Parcel 6 Faith Baptist Church 3607 Oleander Ave. F~. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel 7 '" ~arold D. Eilpacrick 321N.,Bailroad Ave. Bolmcon Bch., Fl. 33435 Parcel 8 ' Treeaweet Products Co. P. O..Box 189 Fort Pierce, FL 33454 Parcel Grady & Geraldine 4040 Sunrise Blvd. · Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel 10 ' Platte Branch S/D, Lot I Joseph Lath &"H';B; bore 276 BurmudaBch,,D~. William& Saralyn Zumbrum 1400 Platte Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33t49 Ft. Fierce, Fl. 33482 Pla, tta Breach S/D, Lot 3 Htchael & Jane Hlnkle 940. S. Fed. ~. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33430 Parcel Ii .~oanle g. Parks 4002 Oleander Ave. PC. Pierce,. Fl. 33482 Loc 4 Bobby & ShielaEgserC 216 SmallvoodDr. ~t. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcels 12 & 13 Ruth V. Vegasr 4000 Oleander Ave. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33~82 Platte Brmmh S/D, '~ot 2 'David &Ann~tllbur 1402 PI'acts Pl. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 The Tropics SiD,Bik. 5(All) Stuart & Estelle Godfrey 600 $. lOch SC. Ft. ~terce, Fl. 33450 Farce! 14 Patrlcia K. LeVinese 2600 GreBoryLn Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 leander Pk. $/D,LoC l&19 Robert & Leuventa Walker 4006 Oleander Ave. Pierce, FI. 33482 F~ench Creek S/D, Loc 2 Eaten Martin 2718 S 10Ch SC. PC. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Loc 14 · ~0[Y~e~c_risCtne Berger h Creek Ln. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 . Parcel 17 ' '" Econo Auco PatnCtug,b'PB, Inc. 104 E.'Fowler Ave. ~* Palm Bch., Fl. 33612 :PerCe~ 20 ............... . l~'ank & ~erly BteZ Re. 1, Box 638 Znd~cown, Fl. 33456 Parcel 23 ~eorge & Donna Fren~ 904 S. Harket Sc. 1~. P/arco, Pl. 33'482 Pareel 2~ ~LmnaHowerCon 915 Barrel Ave. FO. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel IS Larry Pendarvta P.O. Box 703 Palm ClOys Fl. 33490 French Creek S/D, Loc I Arthur & Judy Scrtckland 802 French Creek Ln. PC. Pierce, Fl. 33482 French C~eek S/D, LoC 3 Sunbursc Service Corp, P.O. Box 3780 FO. Pterce~ Fl. 33448 Loc 15 Pergus Development, Inc. 3135 S. Fed. Hwy. Ft. ~teree, Fl. 33482 LoC 13 James &~artlyn Shepard 503 Emil Ave. FO. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parce! 16 Pac Procacci 245 Country Club Blvd. Boca Eaton, Fl. 33431 Farce! 18 Alberc A. Nemech 1870 OceanWay Vero Bch., ,Fi. 33963 Parcel 19 Zud/an R/verArmature, Inc. 3800 Oleander Ave. Ft. Pierce,-Fl. '33482 Perce!2! ..... : ........ .:::- Parcel 22-- ~/Cchell Concrete Produces, Inc. "Leo & RhodaLandts 903 S. Market Ave. 6670 Znd.~/an Creek Dr. PC. Pierce, Ir/. 33482 Parcel 24 Carlos E. A1Ouso, eC al. .P.O. Box 787 Pc. Pierce, F!* 33454 Parcel 27 Parcel 25 H/chael W. Regan, ec al 913. Barre1'Ave. 1~. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Thomas Krlek~, et al. 1325 Roanoke Port Sc. Lucle, Fl. 33452 [ [ |sogrd of Comm~.ssioners ~ ~ dst Lucie County · " ' , * 33450 August 1, 1986 Attn: Chairman- Re : Re-zoning 4006 Sunrise Gentlemen- The reason? for our request for a moderate in zoning classification for our 23 acre~arcel at the a~ove a~dress are as follows: 1. We grove for the p many years befo the ditching pl. caused by freez, for proper grow have operated this property 'as a est 24 years, and, it was a grove.f~ ce that.. Becaume of the age .of the ~n (drainage) and the severe .~s and unavailability of qualified maintenance and normal marketing )ickers), we have decided to give up (primarily, no ] a small grove o~ner with all its pro~b&mms and cont ousfinancial losses. 2. Ha~ people over the highest and best agreement was re mitted for Count ,ing been in touch with the County past 3 years concerning the most , use for the land, we felt that mu ached for the plan application as y and State approvals. 3. Th~ Comprehensive Land Use Plan calls 'up to 5 unites ~er acre. The current zoning calls 3 units per acre. We are asking for 5.6.-units per with those units abutting sunrise Boulevard to be marily single story as a natural .step-down from our maining property which fronts o~ Oleander Avenue. balance of the 2B acres ars laid out in cul-de-sacs a nice green areas~.Also, no units would have anyroae living above or over them. 4. We discarded the idea of submitting a plan for 8-10 units per acre because of the cha . ~ou~n._°f ~t.he residential' neighborhood 1,,i-~ ..~ ~ ......... uu~ ~es~-r'acter'an~ 5. Because of the cemetery., Juvenile Deten- tion Home (which I did not oppose at the time, as an adjoinin? property-owner -_ trying to be cooperative), the Baptist School, other commercial properties and one parcel,,which.is not 100 yards from ours ~ecently zoned for 1% u~l~s per acre", we sincerely feel that our request ~s 3uStified. UflNTE~ R O. UOX 10~ · PALM crTY. FLO~DA334g0 SUMMF~p. O. IK~ 77ii ' flAII~.T ll{I.~qi{). MAINE 040(L1 -2- f 6. We ~eel that the ,communit' wxll rom our proposed ~1~ ~-~ -'~ .... Y ' benefit · -- = .... , Q~, when it is c ' we genuinely thin~ *~-~ ~= .... ompleted, We trus~ that you will approve our application and will recommend its approval at the State level. matterThank for our you family, for your consideration of this important Mailing Address: P.O.' Box 1096 Palm City, Fla. 33490 -Copies: Dan Sugg, Agent Jay ~ood 4006' Sunrise ~uleva~ Fort Pierce, Fla. 3345{ 2571 BOB GRAHAM Governor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST · TALLAHASSEE, November 12, 1986 AFFAIRS FLORIDA 32399 TOM LEWIS, JR. Secretary The Honorable Havert L. Fenn Chairman St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort: Pierce, Florida 33482-5652 Dear Commissioner Fenn: Pursuant to section 163.3184, Florida ~_~?m~.unl~y Affairs has conducte~a r~J~.~a~t~' the Department ~,~s ~o t~e St. r,,~ ........ = _ ~-~w u~ ~ne DroDo~ ~= ~uun~y ~rowth Management Policy-p~. Our review indicated that the August 1 amendments were generally co--~-~,~ ..:~ ~, 1986, proposed plan ~e~..~_n?~ed.~n the attached c0mment~? :~s~~ry requirements . ~n~y snou±~ continue to --~-: ..... ~',=.~par~ment believes p±an amendments t ~n~,,~ ~_ '~J~o~.~ne c~m~lative impact of su o ...... ~ ~= xnCerna~ conslstency of the adOptedch Growth' Management Policy Plan pursDant to s.163. Statutes. Additional comments from the Treasure3177(2)' F~orid~ Coast Regional Planning Council and the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners have been attached for your review and possible use during the comprehensive plan amendment, process. Once the adoption process is complete, the Department requests a copy of the amended comprehensive plan as required by s.163.3187(3), Florida Statutes. EMERG£NCY MANAGEMENT. HOL'SINC, AND COMMUNITY Dr~'FLOPM£NT. RES¢)U~tCE pLANNIN~ ~l? MANAGEMENT Mr. Havert L. Fenn November 12, 1986 Page Two RFK/lhr Please contact Mr. Lenwood Herron at 904/487-4545.if we can be of further assistance regarding these comments. Sincerely, Robert F. Kessler, 'Chief Bureau of Local Resource Planning Enclosures cc : Treasure come% Regi0ha1 -P~ann~g__C0~hcii ..... _ COMMENTS ON PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PoLicY PLAN Petition #~ The petition of William Carpenter to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential to medium residential appears to be inconsistent with the residential development and agricultural development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on pages 29 and 33. L Petition #7 The petition of Laura Hancock to amend the Future Lan~ Use map from medium residential to commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. Petition #8 The e ' · ......... , - P t~t~on of Malcolm and Sylvia Collins to amend th~ Future Land Use map from medium residential to commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. Petition %10 The petition of Terrance Mack to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential to commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the commercial development policies of the _.Growth Management Policy Plan on page 30. Petition #12 '~ - --~ The petition of Rose Baukmer to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential and commercial general to light industrial appears to be-inconsistent with the residential development and industrial development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan. Dn pages 29 and 32. Petition #13 The Petition of Potter and Cle ho map. from. low res~:_~~=~ to- g rn. to amend the Future Land Use · ncons~stent w~th ~ ....... c0.mm~r¢~al general appears Growth Mana ...... ~.~entlal develo~-~ · to be ~=~,,=nu Fo~lcy Plan on P~ge ~93'''~''~ policies of the Petition #14 Local approval of the H. F. Ma~tek, Jr., project should be deferred u~til specific impact issues have been resolved under the Development of Re~ ..... sufficiently ~uu~ Impact Process pursuant to section 380.06, Flori that this project.ex~, o~l°~id~ S~atute~ It sh~,,~ c~~ f~ ~ucle County. Ther2f-~ ~f3uu Gw~+llng units thresh- .~.-~ un= uepartment of Co~,,I~=l.Sn? applicant should ~anagement for~Uld~ ' ..... ~n~ ....uu une~'=~Ym~l process.arIalrs' Bureau of Resource Petition #17 The petition of the St. Lucie Co ~ Co.mmlssloners to amen ._un~y ~oard of Count t · · --" ~=~auentlal a . light _h? residential development ~ol~.~e~s_~O ~e Inconsistent with Folicy Plan on page 29 = ~=~ oz the Growth Management P_eti tion #19 Local approval of the Minton. et al project should be deferred until specific impact issues have been sufficiently resolved under the Development of Re iona ~sect_ion 380.06, Flori g. 1 .Impact process ur =he De~aw~-~ _~'±~orida Statutes. The ~ ~ .... P. s_uant to ,,,= . _unity Affalrs;_ uld contact ~t for guidance on the DRI prOc~.Bureau of Resource Manage- Petition %20 The petition'of Dorothy L. Foster to amend the Future Land Use map from low-residential to_commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the commercial d~velopment policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on Page 30. Petition #21 Local approval of the Strazzull B. Culverhouse et al ~--?= - 9 ~rothers Company, In~. ~-= issues have bee- -,,== .... e'.~e~erred until =~-~:.- · hn · ' ~u~£~clently reso ~ ,.~_~ _y~~c Impact Regional Impact process pursuan l__~ ~,Au=£ nne Development of applicant shouldtc~t~t~D ~80.06, F!orid~ . =~ affairs, Bureau ~ ~ ....... ~ unu uepartment of the DRI process, o= .,~ouuzue ~anagement for guidance on 2 Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Resource Planning 2571 Executive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, FL 32301 Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Documents Dear 'Mr. Hook: Pursuant to the requ'irements of the ocal ?d Land Development Re-ul~t~^- ~_~L Government Comprehensive p] n 'n - -~ u ,v. ~c Ch . a nl ~reasure Coast Regional pl,,.~-~ ~_. ~ . apter 163, Florida Statut~ - Luc:ie County l~ a ...... ~%"'~v ~uunci/ revieweu th~ ~n"m=n+.._ Z~' ~h_ ~ ~n. u~ e~emen£ a~ i~s r~,.~ ...... :_ .. a~ ....... ?~, ~u ~ne St. · -~u,a- meeting on 3eptember 22, 1986. The following comments were approved by Council for transmittal to the State Department of Community Affair~ pursuant to Sections 163.3184(1)(c) and (2), Florida Statutes, for co"sideration by the County prior to adoption of the document. Evaluation The proposed amendments to the Land Use E'lement have been reviewed in accordance with the requirements Of Chapter 163, F]orida Statutes, Council's review procedures, and Council's adopted plans and Policies. The following comments are offered as a result of that r~view. The proposed amendments 'are not i confli · · . ~_ _ cern, however, and~ho~ld n-' ~ ~., ~tem 20) ~y a comprehensive reevaluati.~ _~ ~.u~_~e Considered prior objectives for the ~-~-- . u,, u~ ~ne County's -~-~- - ~n~re area (see attached letter). ~u~,~ and Prior to the approval of the land use amendments the proposed chanoes should be tested aoalnst the St. 'Lucie transportation model to assure that the affected roadways County can accommodate the more ~ntense land u~es. Council supports the efforts of St. Lucie County and the School Board of St. Lucie County (see the attached letter) in improving educational opportunities through the use of d~dications and impact fees as discussed in the amendment request. Mr. Ralph K. Hook Page two September 23, 1986 The property described by Item 1 is close to the sites of the Treasure Coast Square Mall and the proposed Vista Plantation development in Martin County. ensured. Adequate right-of-way The ability of U.S. 1 to accommodate additional traffi~ generated by Item 1 must be expansion of the roadway network should be dedicated for future parcel, prior to the development of this Considering the proximity of ~tem 16 to the St. l ucie County Airport, the current land use d~sianation · - ~e .mor~ appropriate than thX' -~ ..... O~ L!~ht Industrial may oes,gnation. Consideration .~,~._.~r~pose? Res,oential land use expansion of t~e air-~-+ ~-~? De g.lven to plans for fut r traffic~ as well as-~J~ es one increased levels of ~ ~ .u,~ aha safety issues. ' ~" The property ~ - :- ' . ~ d£~c[~be~ ~ Item 18 contains man acr wetland~ known ~s ~ne mor~hern Sa--- ...... ~ es of to minimize the impacts af '~'~:'-~a[e Should be taken environ~ental)y p .- · - y uevelopment s..ns,tive area. on this the land use amendment not be approved until both St. Lucie County"a~d Indian River County qree t · ~t .~dversely- affect the abili ~ ^~ ~ such a~ act,on would growth mana-~^-~ --~ - t~ ~. ~ner count,, + .... +h~ __,_.~o,,,~ dna p/anninq oU.iectiw~ - ,-~- ~ ~u realize -"~ .-~onshlp. of th~ ~=~-..~r,m~ry concern is uroan/agricultural' boundary. D~_~-~- _ -,~n ~he existing · · e/o men~. res]dent,~l may create ~ .... ~2~,.~p ? the property as agr, cultura) development ~Lu'~:~ P[o~/~ms with existing land use, the County sh~u ~- ~u cons,oer, ng any change in ld car,.fu)ly consider its long range plans for this area, provision infrastructure and services, and the impacts of residentia development on agricultural activitieq in the area. Add,ti, )ly, a project of the size of this proposal would be a DRI. Final consideration of the proposed land use change should, perhaps, wait until a report ~nd recommendations can be dew loped that evaluate regional ISSU~S. Mr. Ralph~K. Hook Page three September 23, !986 If you need additiona! info6mation or have hesitate to call me. .Sincerely~ Dan~ef~'--~. Ca~y Executive Director any questions, please do not DM(:: 1 g ..... Attachments PROPOSED LAND USE AMENDMENTS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY ITEM ACRES 1 9.2 2 18.0 3 37.5 4 3.0 5 23.1 6 1.5 7 0.9 8 1.5 9 .... 17.6 10 30.5 11 4.4 12 O. 13 278.0 14 32.5 15 37.5 16 52.5 I7 0.3 I8 760.0 20 5,64 3.0 CURRENT DESIGNATIO_N Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Medium Residential, Medium Commercial, General Residential, Low ' --~ ~ Semi -U rb an Residential, Low Commercial, General Residential, Low Agricultural, Productive Semi -Urban Semi -U ~§ an Industrial, Light Residential, Low Semi-Urban Residential, Low Agricultural, Productive PROPOSED DESIGNATION Commercial, General Commercial, General Commercial, General Commercial, General Residential, Medium Commercial, General Commercial, General Residential~ Medium Comme6ci al, To, ri s t Residential, Low Industrial, Light Commercial, General Residential, Low Industrial, Light Industrial, Light Res'idential, Medium Residential, Medium Industrial, Light Commercial, General Semi-Urban BOA~(D OF CO UNTY COMMISSIO.._ 1840 25th Street. Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone i305) 567-8000 September 9, 1986 Mr. Peter G. Merritt Treasure Coast Regional 620 South Dixie Highway Stuart, FL 33495 Planning Council Suncom Telephone: 424-10t 1 RE: Land Use Amendmept for St. Lucie County - Falcon Ridge Dear Mr. Merritt: ~n~zan RAver County star . , ' Strazzul~a Br~,~ .... f has revze .... ~ ame-~ ~LI' . ~un=z~ uompanv, In -== =ne petltion .. ..~ u~ zUture ~=~ _ - c. and John m ~..~__ - of th, manageme-t p--: t¥~u use m~ps of th~ o~--_~u%vernouse etai u~cy Plan from . ~ ou. ~Ucle Coun ~or the ~bove refers .... ~G (Agricultural) ~. ~, ,. t~ Growt~ are as follows. ,~=u pro~ect. At this · . ~,-= ~ar~'s comment 2[) oneThe ~nitDr°p°sedperPr°jeCtacre) landi use designation. (SU S ' Co~nty,s Land Use p s not= compatlble with em~ Urba9 at acres). ~ Th .. . lan (Agriculture Igdian River curr~ntT,/ ~ ~xlSt~ng .parcels ', ~_ a~ one unit per firm ~_ necessary urba~t~7;~o~uc~ion. Until '~%~ ~a~re uzroun~in~ ...... aces becom~ .... ~. -. ~.-= =nat ...... =an~ would be ~_2~_ ~ uld create ,,~ .... . staff ~=~u=ure. ~=-m-zrog develop- 2) Staff has COncerns regard'ng traffic im ac enter%ng into Indian aiv~; . P ts to lo project develo s . _. County that co o..~1 roads P to its ,-=~i -~ ~..:~_~ . uld reo~lu as the m .... ~uaa~out.capacity. Please be advised that the Board of County Commissioners has not Considered these comments, however, upon direction from the Treasure CoRet Regional Planning Council, staff will present this issue to the Board for their deliberation. We apPreciate the opportunity to comment haveC°ncerhSany questionsCa~ be addressed or comments, in the applicant,sand hope that our 00, ext. response. If you me at 567-8 247. Please do not hesitate to contact Sincerely, Art Challaco:~-~¢~-'kO-.. Chief, Envir~nmental Planning cc:TommyR°ber%Thomaseating' AICP Mike Miller Jim Davis Richard Shearer Mike Orr Stan Boling WEDNESDAY AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 17 1986 7:00 P.M. Petition of William L. Carpenter by Agent: Daniel SuRe, to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from RL (Low Density Residenti.~l Development) to R~ (Medium Density Residential Developme]]t) for the following described property: e SEt of the NEt, less 1 acre, lying West of ~lite City Road, d.) and less that part lying South of Platts Branch, containing ! or less; and that part of the SW% of the NEt,-lying North ~hlte 'City Road (Sunrise ilvd.); ail lying and being in See.33, ~outh and Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Subject to ."-ray for drainage canals and public roads. (Location: East side of Sunris~ Blvd. approximately 1600' south of Bell Av,:nue.) Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners. If it.becomes necessary· these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County C°mmissionels are lectronlcally recorded. Any person who e · decides to ppeal any action taken by the Board of County Commissione: s at this meeting will need a record of the ~l~e. W%: of th (SUnrise 1% acres mot · and East of Township 35, .'_ll proceedings verbatim :re, ~nd for such purpose )rd of the proceeding may need to ensure that a s is made. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /s!/ Jim Minix, Chairman D~niel Sugg 750 N;E. Commercial St. Jensen Bch., FI. 33452 ~ROP.__ER~y OWNERS IN PETiTiONED AREA A William Et Carpenter P.O. Box 1096 Palm City,~F1. 334g0 OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIE~ Parcel 1 4 W Corp. c/o Donald Wheeler Rt. 3, Box 3492 Melrose, FI. 32666 Parcels 2 & 4 Reginald & Ida Childs 3803 Sunrise Blvd. FT. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel 3 William & Beth Childs 3805 Sunrise Blvd. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel 5 Int. Imp. Fund of Florida St. of Fi. D.O.T . 202 Blount St. Tallahassee, Fi. 32304 Parcel 6 Faith Baptist Church 3607 Oleander Ave. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel 7 Harold D. Kilpatrick 321N. Railroad Ave. Boynton Bch., Fi. 33435 Parcel 8 Treesweet Products Co. ?. O. Box 189 Fort Pierce, FL 33454 Parcel 9 Grady & Geraldine FitzpatriCk 4040 Sunrise Blvd. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel 10 Joseph Lach & H.B. Moore 276 Burmuda Bch. Dr. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33449 Platts Branch S/D, Lot 1 William & Saralyn Zumbrum 1400 Platts Ln. Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482 Platts Branch S/D, Lot 2 David & Ann Willbur 1402 Platts Pi. Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482 Branch S/D, Lot 3 & Jane Hinkle S. Fed. Hwy. t. Pierce, Fl. 33450 Lot 4 Bobby & Shiela Eggert 216 Smallwood Dr. Ft. Pierce, FI. 33482 The Tropics S/D,Blk. 5(All) Stuart & Estelle Godfrey 600 S. 10th St. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33450 .rcel 11 E. Parks Oleander Ave. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcels 12 & 13 Ruth V. Wagner 4000 Oleander Ave. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel 14 Patricia K. Leviness 2600 Gregory Ln Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482 Oleander Pk. S/D,Lot l&19 Robert & Leuvenia Walker 4006 Oleander Ave~ Ft. Pierce, Fi. 3J482 Parcel 15 Larry Pendarvis P.O. Box 703 Palm City, Fi. 33490 French Creek S/D, Lot 1 Arthur & Judy Strickland 802 French Creek Ln. Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482 French Creek S/D, Lot 2 Karen Martin 2718 S 10th St. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 French Creek S/D, Lot 3 Sunburst Service Corp. P.O. Box 3780 Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33448 Lot 13 James & Marilyn Shepard 503 Emil Ave. Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482 Lot 14 Gary & Christine Berger 801 French Creek Ln. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Lot 15 Pergus Development, Inc. 3135 S. Fed. Hwy. Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482 Parcel 16 Pat Procacci 245 Country Club Blvd. Boca Raton, Fl. 33431 Parcel 17 Econo Auto Painting,WPB,Inc. 104 E. Fowler Ave. W. Palm Bch., Fl. 33612 Parcel 18 Albert A. Nemeth 1870 Ocean Way Vero Bch., Fl. 33963 Parcel 19 Indian River Armature, Inc. 3800 Oleander Ave. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel 20 Frank & Kimberly Biel Rt. 1, Box 638 Indiantown, Fl. 33456 Parcel 21 Mitchell Concrete Products, Inc. 903 S. Market Ave. Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482 Parcel 22 Leo & Rhoda Landis 6670 Indian Creek Dr. Miami Bch., Fl. 33141 Parcel 23 =eorge & Donna Frenz )04 S. Market St. Ft- Pierce, FI. 33482 Parcel 24 Carlos E. Alonso, et al. P.O. Box 787 Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33454 Parcel 25 Michael W. Regan, et al 913 Barrel Ave. Ft. Pierce, Fi. 33482 ~rcel 26 )ma Howerton !5 Barrel Ave. · Pierce, Fl. 33482 Parcel 27 Thomas Kriska, et al. 1325 Roanoke St. Port St. Lucie, Fl. 33452 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSiONCRS December 9, 1986 DCVCLOPMCNT COORDINATOR J. GARY AMENT In compliance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance you are hereby advised that William L. Carpenter, by Agent: Daniel Sugg, has petitioned the Board of CounTy Commis- sioners lo amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie Cot!nty Growth Management Policy Plan from RL (Low Density Residential Development) to R~ (Medium Density Residential Development) for the followin9 described property: The W~ of the SE¼ of the NE¼, less ! acre, lytnE West of White City Road, (:Sunrise lvd.) and less that part lying South of Platts Branch, containing 1½ acres ore or less; and that part of the SW~ of the NE~, lying North and East cf White 'City Road (SunriSe Blvd.); all lying and hein§ in $ec.33, Township 35 South and_Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Subject to all rights-of-ray for drainage canals and public roads. (Location. East side of Sunrise Blvd approximately 1600' of Bell A~'enue.) ' south The Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on this petition at 7:00 P.M. on Wednesday, December 17, 1986, in Room 101, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fcrt Pierce, Florida. Ail interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Please note that all proceedings before Commlssmon~rs of St. Lucie ~,~ ..... ~he Board of County recorded. Any person Who ~3~'~i~3'-~±°rlaa' are electronically u~cm~es ~o a e the Board 6f County Comm~---[ P~ al any action taken record of ~he proceedings,~:~e~a~_~ms meetmng will need aby ensure that = .... ~-- ~ ~ ~ ~uun purpose may need to ~ ~umm recor~ oz the proceedings is made. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. This notice ' ms Deing sent to all adjacent property owners. If you should have any 'questions, ~ddi~iona ' obtained bJ call~ ........ ~_ 1 mnformation m . ~ ~ ~rea ~o~e 3U5, 466 1~nn ~ _ ay be - ~uu, mxnension 359. Sincerely, BOARD OF COpNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Jim Minix, ~hairman dcm HAVERT L. FENN, District No. ~ · E. E 2300 Vir¢ Coordinator: Ext. 398 · B~ · GREEN, Dis~r;ct Ne.county2 · JACKAdministrotorKRIEGER, Distr. WELDoNCt No. B.3 ·LEWiSR. DALE TREFELNER, DistriCt No. 4 · JIM MINIX. District No. 5 ~inia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Iding: Ext. 344 · Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: Ext. 3t7 2571 STATE DEPARTMENT OF EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, OF COMMUNITY FLOR! D A"" 12:17 AFFAIRS EAST · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399 BOB GRAHAM Governor TOM LEWIS, JR. Secretary The Hono Chairman St. Luci Commis 2300 Vir Fort Pie TRANSMITTAL SLIP Date ,/~'" ( From: J. GARY AMENT County Development Coordinator ~"'"TAKE NECESSARY ACTION PLEASE GIVE ME YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR YOUR INFORMATION PREPARE REPLY FOR MY/YOUR SIGNATURE PREPARE DOCUMENT _ REPRODUCE COPIES FOR: 1986 Dear Com amendmen' except a the Coun plan ame: Growth M, Statutes Planning Commissi~ during t: Onct requests s.163/31, County Commissioners__ County Administrator Assistant County Administrator County Attorney Planning AdminiStrator Env. Planner MPC Sup./Long-Range Planner Shod-Range Planner Assistant Short-Range Planner__ Assistant Long-Range Planner__ Assistant Transp. Planner ZOning Administrator Bldg. Codes Administrator Code Enforcement. Other ~, the Department he proposed amend- Policy Plan. 86, proposed plan atutory requirements epartment believes tive impact:of such cy of the adopted 3177(2), ~lorida Coast Regional rd of County and possible use Department n as required by ~OM __DIS. PR. --PKS. ~Y.H. ~AG. ~ENG. __ PERS. ~FIN. __ APT. -- LANDFL. PUR. ~APPR. F~---'~TI'Y, ~ LIB. -..: REC. ~CLERK. ~ 911 MI. AD~. __ ROAD ~COLL. ~ COM. SEC. ~ MT. COt __ SERV. ~ELEO. -- DATA --MT. CTHS. __ V.A. __SHER. ~'V. -- MOSQ, -- WELF. OTHER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOL SING AND COM/'AUNITY Dr~'FLOPMENT · RESOURCE PLANNIN' ,,,1:' MANAGEMENT Mr. Haver~ L. Fenn November 12,. 1986 Page Two Please contact Mr. Lenwood Herron at 904/487-4545 if we can be of further assistance regarding these comments. Sincerely, Robert F. Kessler, Chief Bureau of Local Resource Planning RFK/lhr Enclosures cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council COMMENTS ON PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY PLAN Petition %6 The petition of William Carpenter to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential to medium residential appears to be inconsistent with the residential development and agricultural development policies of the Grbwth Management Policy Plan on pages 29 and 33. Petition %7 The petition of Laura Hancock to amend the Future Land Use ma from medium residential t~ commercial general appears to be P inconsistgnt with the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan On page 29. ~gtition ~8 The petition of Malcolm and Sy%via Collins to amend the Future Land Use map f~om medium residential to commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. Petition %10 The petition of Terrance Mack ~o amend the Future Land Use map from low r~sidential to commerdial general appears to be ~ncon~iste~t with the commercial development policies of the urowth Management Policy Plan On page 30. Petition #12 The petitign of Rose Baukmer to amend the Future Land Use map from low residential and commercial general to light industrial appears to be inconsistent With the residential development and industrial development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on pages 29 and 32. P__etition #13 The petition of Potter and'Cleghorn to amend the Future Land Use map from lqw residential to commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. 1 Petition #14 Local approval of the H. F. Martek, Jr., project should be deferred qntil specific impact~issues have been sufficiently resolved ~nder the Development of Regional Impact Process pursuant to section 380.06, FlOrida Statutes. It should be noted that this project exceeds 80% 9f the 1,000 dwelling units thresh- old for St. Lucie County. Therefore, th~ applicant should contact the Department of Commgnity Affairs, Bureau of Resource Management for guidance on the !DRI process. Petition #17 The petition of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to-amend the Future Land Use map from light industrial to medium residentiail appears to be inconsistent With the residential development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 29. Petition #19 LOcal apprQval of the Minton. et al project should be deferred until specific impact issues have been sufficiently resolved under the Development of Regional Impact process pursuant to section 38Q.06, Florida Statutes. The applicant should contact the Department o~ C--6-~n~ty Affairs, Bureau of Resource Manage- ment for guidance on the DRI process. Petition The petition of Dorothy L. Foster to amend the Future Land Use map from lqw residential to commercial general appears to be inconsistent with the commercial development policies of the Growth Management Policy Plan on page 30. Petition #21 Local appro B. CulVerho issues have Regional Im Statutes. Community A the DRI pro~ val of the Strazzulla Brothers Company, Inc., and John use et al should be deferred until specific impact been sufficiently resolved under the Development of pact process pursuant to section 380.06, Florida the applicant should contact the Department of ~fairs, Bureau of Resource Manag6ment for guidance on :ess. Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Resource Planning 2571 Executive Center Circle, East Ta|lahassee, FL 32301 Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Documents Dear Mr. Hook: Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Requlation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes,-the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council reviewed the amendments to th~ St. Lucie County land use element at its regular meeting on September 22, 1986. - The following comments were approved by Council for transmittal to the State Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Sections 163.3184(1)(c) and (2), Florida Statutes, for consideration by the County prior to adoption of the document. Evaluation The proposed amendments to the Land Use Element have been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter ~63, Florida Statutes, Council's review procedures, and Council's adopted plans and policies. The fol)owin9 Comments are offered as a result of that rpview. The proposed amendments are not in conflict or inconsistent with adopted Council plans or policies. Proposals to convert large tracts of agricultural lands to semi-urban uses (e.g., Item 20) are of some concern, however, and should not be considered prior to a comprehensive reevaluation of the County's goals and objectives for the entire area (see attached letter). Prior to the approval of the land use amendments, the proposed changes should be tested aQainst the St. Lucie County transportation model, to assure that the affected roadways can accommodate the more intense land uses. Council supports the efforts of St. Lucie County and the School Board of St. L.ucie County (see the attached letter) in improving educational opportunities thnough-the use of dmdications and impact fees as discussed in the amendment request. o..c. hcndiV, I~t ~cn t, marcus Mr. Ralph K. Hook Page two September 23, 1986 The property described by It!em 1 is close to the sites of 'the Treasure Coast Square Mall iand the proposed Vista Plantation development in Martin Counity. The ability of U.S. I to accommodate additional traffic generated by Item t must be ensured. Adequate right-of-Bay should be dedicated f~r future expansion of the roadway netwiork prior to the development of this parcel. Considering ~'the proximity of Item 16 to the St. Lucie County Airport, the current land use desianation of Light Industrial may be m~re appropriate than tihe p~oposed Residential land use desigpation. Consideration should be given to plans for future expansion of the airport facilities an~ increased levels of air traffic, as well as noise and Isafety~issues. The property described by Item 18 contains many acres of wetlands known as the Nor£hern Savannas. Care should be taken to minimize the impacts of any development on this environmentally sensitiv~ area~. The propertv d~scribed b~ Item 20 is located on the border of Indiah Rive~ County and is near the interface of the St. Johns River Water Manaaement District and South Florida Water Management District-. Since a development of such size in this location may have far reaching impacts, it is recommended that the land use amendment not ~e approved until both St. Lucie Count~ and Indian River Countly aQree that such an action would not adversely affect the ab~ity of ~ther county to realize growth management and plannin~ objectives. A ~rimary concern is the relationship of th~ project with the existing urban~agricultural boundary. Development of the property as residential may create compatibility problems with existing agricultural development. Prior to considerino any chan~e in land }se, the County should ~arefully conside~ its lonQ ~ange plans for this area, provisi~ of infrastructure and s~rvice~, ~ and the impacts of residential development on agricultural activities in the area Additionally, a project of the size of this proposal would ~e a ~RI. Final consideration of the proposed land use change should, perhaps, wait until a report and recommendations can be ~eveloped that' evaluate regional issues. Mr. Ralph K- Hook Page three September 23, 1986 If you ne?d additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate t, call me. Sincerely~, / Daniel M. ary " Executive Director DMC:lg Attachments ITEM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PROPOSED LAND USE AMENDMENTS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY A~RES 9.2 18.0 37.~5 3.0 23.1 1.5 0.9 1.5 17.6 30.5 4.4 CURRENT DESIGNATION Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Low Residential, Low 0.7 278.0 32.5 37.5 52.5 0.3 760.0 2.3 5,643.0 Residential, Low Residential ,.~ Medium Residential,. Medium Commercial, General Residential,~ Low Semi -U rb an Residential, Low Commerci al, General Residential, Low Agricultural, Productive Semi -U rb an Semi -U rb an Industrial, Light Residential, Low Semi -Urban Residential, Low Agricultural, Productive PROPOSED DESIGNATION Commercial, General commercial, General Commercial, General Commercial, General Residential, Medium Commercial, General Commercial, General Residential, Medium Commercial, Tourist Residential, Low Industrial, Light Commercial, General Residential, Low Industrial, Light Industrial, Light Residential, Medium Residential, Medium Industrial, Light Commercial, Genenal Semi-Urban BOA "D OF COUNTY COMMISSIOi 18:~0 25th Street. Vero Beach. Florida 32960 Telephone ($05) 567-8000 September 9, 1986 Mr. Peter G. Merritt Treasur~ Coast Regional Planning Council 620 Sou~h Dixie Highway Stuart, FL 33495 Suncom Telephone: 424-1011 RE: Land Use Amendment for St. Lucie County - Falcon Ridge Dear Mr. Merritt- Indian River County staff has rev£ewed the petition of the Strazzu~a Brothers Company, Inc. and aohn B. Culverhouse etal to amend the future land use maps of the St. hucie County Growth Hanageme~t Policy Plan from AG (Agricultural) to SU ($emipOrban) for the Above ~eEerenced pro~ect. At this time staff's comments are as follows. !) _The proposed project land use designation (SU Semi-Urban at one unit per acre) is not compatible with Indian River Country's Land Use Plan (Agriculture at one unit per five acr(s). The existing parcels in the surrounding area are cur~'ently in agricultural production. Until such time that the necessary urban s~rvices become available and th~ surxounding area infil~s with urban development, beli staff eves that this project would create "leap-frog" develop- men~ and would be premature. 2) Staff has concerns regarlding traffic impacts to local roads entering into Indian River County that could result as the project develops to its maximum buildout.capacity. Please be advised that the Board of County Commissioners has not considerel these comments, however, upon direction from the Treasurs east Regional Planning Council, staff will present this issue to :he Board for their deliberation. We appreciate the opportunity to comment, and hope that our concerns Can be addressed ini the applicant s response. If you have'any ~uestions or commentsi; please do not hesitate me at 567 8000, ext. 247. to contact Sincerely, Art Challa Chief, Env cc: Rober Tommy Jim D Mike combe ironmental Planning t Keating, AICP Thomas avis )rr Mike Miller Richard Shearer Stan Boling LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA MINUTES BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Tapes: 1,' 2, 3, 4 PUBLIC HEARING: Chairman J. P. Terpening, Mabel Fawsett, Jim Russakis, Patricia King, '~. J. Sciturro (through Fender petition, excused for following petitions), Patrici~ Ferrick (absent for first petition, Jode Groves, excused), Robert Carman (absent for first pettion, Jode Gfbves, excused). William Myers, Peggy Harris (both excused absences). Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney; Dennis Murphy, Planner; Gary Schindler, Planning Administrator; Dolores Messer, Secretary. DATE OF HEARING: 1:2/9/86 CONVENED: 7:00 P.M. ADJOURNED: 1:10 A.M. Page: 1 Petition of William E. Carpenter (by Agent: Dan£el Sugg) to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from RL (Low Density ResidenTial) to RM (Medium Density Residential) located on the east ~side of Sunrise Blvd., approximately 1600' south of Bell Avenue. Mr. Dan Sugg represented the petitioner. He presented an aerial photo showing surrounding land use: RL on the west, Dept. of Correction Detention-Center and a church school on the north, IL on the east, RL on a portion on the south, RM on the remaining southern boundary, and a heavy commercial development along Oleander Blvd. The petitioner is not asking for 11 d.a./ac., but slightly less than 6 d.u./ac, RL to RM zoning. He said they proposed single story, low profile units along Sunrise Blvd. which is in keeping with the residential character of White City. Mr. William C. Carpenter appeared before the Board giving h~s background. He said a quality development is proposed, and explained traffic would only be increased + 20%. The following persons were in opposition to the petition: Mr. F. H. Conrad expressed his concern regarding drainage and rental units; Mr. Grady Fitzpatrick who was concerned with drainage and flooding;. Mr. Bill~ Zumbrum who was also concerned with flooding, increased traffic and hazardous traffic conditions, and neighborhood quality; Mr. David Wilbur who opposes use other than single family residences, has water, sewer, and traffic ..... concerns; Mr, Nevy Townsend who expressed his concern regardin, g neighborhogd quality; Mr. Gerald Davis expressed his opposition; Mr. John Denmark expressed his concern regarding traffic. Mr. Carpenter addressed traffic and drainage concerns regarding intended density, and the quality of the intended project. He also mentioned a letter from the Ft. Pierce Utility Authority that water and sewer are available. Chairman Terpening closed the public portion of the hearing. Mr. Murphy of Staff responded tO Mr. Carpenter's question regard- ing traffic figures. Regarding Dept. of Community Affairs comments, they found the petition to be inconsistent with residential development and agricultural development policies of the GMPP. Mr. Murphy found that statement to be confusing and has been trying to obtain clarification. Regarding Treasure Coast RegiOnal Planning Council comments, they determined that the proposed amendment did not contravene any regional policy or plan. Staff's position is one of approval due to the proposed change in land use providing a reasonable development opportunity an~ transition of use between industrial areas and single family ar~as. Staff would prefer to see a Planned Unit Development that would afford the developer maximum design flexibility, while addressing the issues of water management, landscaping, screening, etc. Staff recommends approval of this petition. Mr. Carman questioned Staff regarding agricultural land east of the turnpike being in a holding position, subject to rezoning or changes to the GMPP,-and land west of the turnpike should be preserved for agriculture. Mr. Murphy explained that the philosophy Was that the agriculture lands lying "in the urbanizing or developiog portion of the County would eventually be developed in some fashion. Mr. Russaki~ stated his concern regarding an increase in traffic flow on Sunrise Blvd. and the possibility of spot zoning. AGENDA - LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY TUESDAY DECEMBER 9, 1986 7:00 P.M. Petition of William E. Carpenter by Agent: Daniel Sugg, to amend the FUture Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from RL (Low Density Residential Developmen~ ) to RM (Medium Density Residential Development) for the following described Property: The W~ of the SE¼ of the NE¼, less ! acre lying Wes~ of ~lite City ROad, (Sunrise Blvd _ and East of ~ itc r ranch, containing City Road (Sunrise ~,' lying North Blvd.); all lying and Township 35 So lth and Range 40 Eas being all rights,of_ ...... ~Y for drai .... tf St. Lucle Coun~ .... in Sec.33, ..... ~= canals and ~.~.~ -J, ~orida. Subject ~o (Location: asr side of Sunrise Blvd. approximately 1600 south of Bell Avenue.) ? ~uu~c roads. ~ Please n te that all proceedings ~ the Local Planning before Agency are e[ctronicallyle recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any actmon taken by the Lo~al Planning Agency at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings is made. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners. dcm BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION6RS November 17, 1986 D V LOPMCNT COORDINATOR J. GARY AMENT In compliance with the provisions of Florida Statutes, you are hereby advised that William E. Carpenter by Agent: Daniel Sugg, has peti%ioned the Local Planning Agency to amend the Future Land Use Classification of the St. Lucie Cqunty Growth Management Policy PI.an from RL (Low Dens%ty Residential Development) to RM (Medium )ensity Residential Development) for the following describe property: The W½ of tie SE¼ of the NE¼, less ! acre, lying West of White City Road, {[Sunrise Blvd.) and less that part lying South of Platts Branch, containin§ 1% acres more or less; and that part of the SW¼ of the NE¼,-lying North and East of White City Road (Sunrise Blvd.); all lying and being in Sec.33, Township 35 South and Range 40 East. St. Lucie. County, Florida. Subject to all rights,)f-way for drainage canals and public roads. (Location: East side of Sunris~e Bl~d. approximately 1600" south of Bell Avenue.) A public hearing on the petitbon will be held at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, December 9, 1986, inLRoomr 101, St. Lucie County Admin- istration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at 'that time. Please note that all proceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any acti6n taken by the Local Planning Agency at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. If you have any questions, additional inf9rmation may be obtained by calling Area Code 305, 466-1100, Extension 359. Sincerely, LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY STo LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA J. P. Terpening, Chairman dcm HAVERT L. FENN, District No. I · E. E. GREEN District No. 2 · ]ACK KRIEGER, District No.,3 · R. DALE TREFELNER. District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5 County Administrator - WELDON B. LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 33482-5652 · Phone (305) 466-1100 Coordinator: Ext. 398 · Building: Ext. 344 e Planning: Ext. 316 · Zoning: Ext. 336 · Code Enforcement: EXt. 317