HomeMy WebLinkAboutCallaway Land & Cattle Co (10)BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMiSSIONeRS
June 12, 1989
D6V6LOPM( NT
DIRECTOR
TERRY L. ViRTA
Karner & Associates
Agent for Callaway Land &
2162 Reserve Park Trace
Port St. Lucie, FL 34986
Cattle Co., Inc.
Dear Mrs. Karner:
This letter is to confirm that on May 23, 1989, the St. Lucie
CounTy Board of County Commissioners granted the petition of
Callaway Land and Cattle Co., Inc~ for a change in zoning from
AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential 1 du/ac)_ to CG (Commercial,
General) for property located in the northwest quadrant of the
intersection of 1-95 and Prima Vista Boulevard.
information.A copy of recorded Resolution No. 89-120 is enclosed for your
Sincerely,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY~ FLORIDA
Judy Culpepper, Chairman
dcm
Enclosure
HAYER[ _ FENN Distr,:r NO ~ ~ JUDY CULPEPPEIR DistnCtcour..yNO 2 Adm~nis;roror ® JACK KRIEGER._ WELDoNDiStncF NOBE3LEWiSe R. DALE TREFELNER Disrnct NO. 4 ~ JIM M/NIX. District No. 5
2300 Virginia Avenue e Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Director: (407) 468~ 1590 e Building: (407) 468-1553 e Planning: (407) 468-1576
Zoning: (407) 468-1553 e Code Enforcement: ('407) 468-1571
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
FILE NO.: RZ-89-017
RESOLUTION CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTy, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St.
County~ Florida~ has made the following determinations:
Lucie
i. Callaway Land Cattle Company presented a petition for a
change in'zoning from AR-/ (Agricultural ~eSidential 1 du/ac) to
CG (Commercial General) for the property described below.
2. The St. Lucie County Planning and ZOning Commission,
held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at
least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing and notifying by
mail owners of property within five hundred feet (500~) of the
subject property, and has recommended t~hat the Board ~ the
hereinafter described request for change in Zoning classificaEion
from AR-1 (Agricultural Residential 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial
General) for the property described, below.
3. On May 23rd, 1989, this Board held a public hearing on
the petition, after PUblishing a notice of such hearing in the
For~ Pierce News Tribune on May 3, 1989, and notifying by mai!
all owners of property within 500 feet Qf tho. subject property.
4. The proposed zoning change is consistent: .~? with the St.
Lucie County Of Growth Management Policy Plan and has satisfied the
standards review set out in Section 5..3.'~00 of the St. Lu¢ie
County Zoning Ordinance.
[J R
Commissioner Jim Minix
AYE
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 23rd day of May, 1989.
BOARD OF couNTY C ' ' OMMI_ S
ST.
LUCI
E
~~'~'~' -~ , ,,~.~ ~ .- ... ,...
~ .: ~,.~ .... , . .-.. ..... , .
~OR~CTNESS:,
COUN~: ~O~EY
/
89-120
REZONE(b)
OOK ~
;ONTA!NiNG 30.82 ACRES MORE OR LESS
RIG}{T-OF-WAy LINE OF THE PROPOSED EXTENSION oF 'LEGEND~-DRIVE' AN 80
FOOT INGRESS AND EGRESS RIGHT-6F-WAy; . .
THENCE, DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF- . .
~OULEVARD'~ NOR_T~HE~ASTERL¥ AL~,~ ~ .... ~__ ~AY OF THE PROPOSED '
~LEGENDS DRIVE'~~,~,, ~__~_~___~OPOSED EASTERLY RIOHT OF WAY LINE
RVE~
CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,. HAVING A RADIUS OF "812o04 F-EETI
T~{ENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 571.91
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40:~I,O4, TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE 'TO 'THE. NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF
6!1.85 FEET;-2H~NCE~ NORTHEASTERLY ALONG ~HE ARC OF SAiD CURVE A
DIS?ANCE OF 272.57 FEET, THROUGH~ A CENTRAL-AN~LE OF 25~3!'$0,; THENCE
NORTH 66'54'39~ EAST, 405,g$ FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,' .HAVING A RADIUS OF 7g$,00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE A~C OF SAID CURV~ A DISTANCE OF g49.,49 FEET,
THROUGh{ A 'CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19~26~$$,.; THENCE NORT~ 86~21,S3, ~ EAST
~74.55 FEET TO A POINT OF' CURVATURE 6F A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTh'WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 906 . $9. FEET; ~T~ENC~ NORT~EASTE'RLY A~ONG
THE ARC .OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE 67 IS4 96 FEET~THROUG}{ A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 07,53~4g, ; o
'HENCE D~PARTING sAID PROPOSED E~STERLY RIGHT_OFr~A~ 'LINE. OF 'LEGENDS
;OUT}{ 31 44'36' EAST .i!~6.67 FEET TO THE P6INT OF INTE $ DRIVE',
;AiD WESTERLY LiNE OF ~H~. INTERCHANGE PA'CEL ~n ,~" _R EC?ION ~'ITH THE AFORE
· · R 3 ...... ~ POINT OF BEGINNING
O~
~. 4. On December 8, 1988, the St. Lucie County'Local Planning
Agency held a public hearing of which due notice was Published in
the Ft. Pierce News Tribune, and recommended to this Board that
the Development Order approval for the Development of Regional
Impact kno~ as The Reserve, be ~
5. The Board of Coun~ Commissioners of St. Lucie County,
Florida~ on the 15th day of December 1988, held a public hearing
on the Development of Regional Impact ApPlication for
Development Approval for The Reserve, and has heard and
considered the testimony taken there at.
6. At this public he~r~ng, and following its closure, the
Board of County Commissioners continued any further action on
'~' this application until ~uesday, December 2.0,-~!988.
? On Tuesday, December 20, 1988, the Board_ . of County
Commissioners removed from the table, the request of The Reserve
Development of Regional Impact, for Development Order approval.
8. The BOard of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County,
has received and considered the assessment report and
recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
9. On December 20, 1988, the Board ~d~pted Resolution No.
88-357, effective December 28, !988, granting development order
approval to The Reserve ......
10. On January 20, 1989, the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council Voted to appeal the County's. ~ Development Order
to the Florida Land and Wa~er Adjudicatory Commission°
~R O
2
" D. The proposed Development is consistent with the local
comprehensive plan, development laws and .regulations of St. Lucie
County.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida;
A. That in a public meeting, duly constituted and assembled
this t4th day of March 1989, Resolution NO~ 89-73,~ which amends
Resolution No. 8~-357 granting Development order Approval to the
Development of Regional Impact kno~n as The Reserve, is hereby
'" APPROVED subject to the following conditions, restrictions and
limitations
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
gOO
The Reserve Development of Regional Impact Application for
Development Approval is incorporated herein by reference.
it is relied upon, but not to the exclusion of Other
available information, by the parties in discharging their
statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes.
Substantial compliance with the representations contained in
the Application for Development Approval, as modified by
Development Order conditions, is a condition for approval.
For the purpose of this Condition, the ApPlication for
Development Approval .shall include ~he fOllowing items:
a.!987~ApPlication for Developmen~ ~p~bOval dated July 9,
SupPlemental information dated December 3, 1987- June
15, 1988; July 22 1988- July 29, ig88;~.and August !2,
1988; and '
4
Ce
implemented by the developer to the satisfaction of the City
of Port Sro Lucie~ St. Lucie County, and the Florida
Department Of Environmental Regulation.
The developer shall furnish a comprehensive air quality
computer modeling study and~ if the model shows exceedances,
develop a plan and program for carbon monoxide monitoring
and abatement, and implement all actions necessary to reduce
carbon monoxide emissions to meet State and federal air
quality standards according to the following minimum
requirements:
a. within two months of the effective 'date of the
Development Order (the earlier of two dates if separate
Development Orders are issued by St; Lucie County and
the City of Port St. Lucie; and unless an extension has
been agreed upon by the developer and Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council), submit a comprehensive air
quality computer-modeling study according to a stud~
design approved by Treasure Coa Regional Planning
Council in consultatio~n with Department of
Envirom~ental Regulation;
in case of exceedances as identified by the modeling
study, submit within four months of.the approval of the
modeling study a plan to mitigate project related
traffic air quality impacts and implement the plan to
the maximum extent possible. 'The Plan shall be
approved by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council in consultation with the Department of
Environmental Regulation; and
implement and monitor the plan.
HiSTORIC ANDARCHAEOLOGiCAL SITES
In the event of discovery of any archaeological artifacts
during pro3ect construction, the ~.d~veloper shall stop
construction in that area and immedi:atety notify the
Division of Historical Resources
in t~e~ Florida Departmen~
of State. Proper protection, to the katisfaction of the
Division, shall be provided by the deveioper,.. ~
HABITAT, VEGETATION, AND WILDLIFE
7~(A) Wetlands 1, ~, 5,. 6, 10~ 15~ 16, 26.,~ :33, 38~ 39~ 52, 6tA~
6lB, 63~ 6~, 65, 71, 75, 78, 80, 81,~83, 8~, 86, 89, 9!, 92
and 93 (presently calculated ~o include a tot~! of 167.6
acres which are listed on Table HVW-1 and which are sho~ on
6
b~. The Developer has deeded over free and clear of all
liens and encumbrances to St. Lucie County, or another
entity acceptable to St. Lucie County, Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council, and South Florida Water
Management District, 50.0 acres of upland habitat within the
area labelled "Preferred Upland Wildlife Habitat,',
delineated and shown on Exhibit HVW-4 of the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council Assessment Report for The Reserve
Development of Regional Impact; or
c. The Developer has accomplished a combination of the
actions described in (a) and (b) above which is acceptable
to both South Florida Water Management District and Treasure
Coast .Regional Plannin~ Council.
If the Developer chooses, to meet all or part of this
responsibility by creation of wetland habitat then the
continued viabiliL~y and ma' of_this habitat shall be
assured by deed restrictilntenance '
on, good~ development and drainage
plan design, and assignment of future preservation and
maintenance responsibility to an entity approved by TreaSure
Coast Regional Planning Council and South Florida Water
Managementthe created District wetland occurs. Prior to build-out of. the phase in which
If the Developer chooses to meet ~1~ 'or part of this
mitigation responsibiiit~. ,, by deeding over "Preferred Upland
Wildlife Habmtat ~ as in option (b) above, such lands shall
be transferred with restrictions that require their
preservation as natural habitat area. Such lands shall not
be credited towards the requirement that the Developer
preserve 25 percent of the upland habitat on site, PUrsuant
to another recommended Condition, since these lands are
being dedicated in compensation, for wetland loss.
No
buildin~one, of~ permits the shall~ be issued after January 1, 1991
un~£1
fo!lowin~ has been com-~e~ -
a. The Developer has com
satisfaction of the S~.-~= -~ p~eted, the rea
=~u Treasure Coast Re~i~ ~ - ,,~e_ sgement Dis ri
wetland habitat created ~ursu~_~%?~ab~=e and beyond any
condition), in mitigation ~i; ~_u__~e PSeyi?us recommended
destroyed on this project Site; o'rweu±an~ haOitat already
b.
The
Developer has deeded over free and clear of alt
liens and encumbrances to St. 'Luci~*COunty,
Regionalentity acCeptable~ to~__St. Lucie County
or
another
P!annin~ ~ouncm±, an additioha!~ and 119.7 Treasure acres Coast of
upland habitat within the area labe~ted "Preferred Upland
Wildlife Habitat", delineated and sho~rn t HVW-4 of
the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
C~
Assessment
' 629
500~ .~E
1!.
Reasonable assurance of financial an~ institutional ability
to carry out the commitments included in the approved
themitigati°nfollowing:plan may be provided by any-one,.or._, combination of
a. a sure~y bond in the amount equal to 125 percent of the
cost estimate for implementing the approved mitigation and
m°nitorinu plan;
b. Performance guarantee to St. Lucie County and/or the
City of Port St. Lucie as part of a project construction
guarantee, provided the guarantee adequately covers costs;
c. cash bond or letter of credit from a financial
institution;
d. escrow agreements which include money ,
improvements; and , land or
e. performance prior to wetland loss only applies to
mitigation for wetlands not yet destroyed.
The specific form and adequacy of the guarantee shall be
subject to approval by St. Lucie County and the TCRPC, if
mitigation occurs within the Count, or the City of Port St.
Lucie and the TCRPC, if mitigation occurs within the
Financial guarantees shall not be released for any Portion
of the Project until work is completed, inspected, and
approved in writing by both the South Florida Water
Management District and the TCRPC. The annual report shall
include a summary of wetland mitigation accomplished
pursuant to the approved master plan.,.~ ~
Lakes or canals shall not be excavated within 200 feet of
any wetlands which are Preserved or restored on the PrOject
site. Wells in the shallow aquifer shall not be located
within 300 feet of any wetlands which are Preserved or
restored on the PrOject site. Any except~'ons to this
condition must be approved by
Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council in consultation with South Florida Water
Management District on the basis of 'soil or Other data
showing that water table elevations within preserved
wetlands would not be adversely affected.,
To help assure that maintenan ~'~'-~ .~. ,,
Predevelopment h~dro~~ ce .~r. ~mP!ementati n
r = ~~ OCCur '~ ' 0 Of
estored wetland~ =~ ..... S w~h~n, the ~r ........
volumes of runoff from acceptable runoff to sources to wetlands Prior
elevationst° routing~shallbeOf any excess lake's'SYstems Con-rolt
established consisteh~lt with the intent
allt° maintainwetland or improve 'predevelopment
droperiods
areas.
The Treasure Coast '~gional Planning
within
10
829
~OOK
fora=_n=~ ~ opportunities are maintained° IT shall be the
responsibility of the Develope~ to implemen~ the approved
plan.
15
16.
The developer shall preserve no less than 25 percent (490
acres) of pine flatwoods habitat on site, including canopy,
understory, and ground cover. Pine flatwoods habitat
preserved and protected by deed restrictions pursuant to
wetland buffer zone requirements and upland habitat required
for the protection of species of special reqional concern,
including the Red-cockaded Woodpecker colon~ sites, Sandhill
Crane upland buffer and cabbage palm hammocks shown on
Exhibit HVW-3, may be counted toward meeting this minimum
requirement. The preserved acreage may be the result of
micrositing of development or selective clearing of areas to
be developed, including individual ~lots when developed,
provided maintenance of habitat is required through deed
restriction. However, as a minimum, preserve areas shall
be of appropriate size, quality, and arrangement to
maintain existing populations of species of special
regional concern on the property. No credit toward this 25
percent may be given for land set aside in compensation
for wetlands destroyed by the development which are
required to be mitigated.
The developer shall identify on a current good quality
aerial photo the areas preserved pursuantUto~ this condition
and submit the marked aerial and indicate thel acreage in the
annual report required by Section 380~0~, Florida Statu%es.
The annual report shall include -copies of deed restrictions
assuring preservation of pine fla~wO~ds acreage.
Preservation shall be accomplished in common areas, prese~;e
areas, buffer zones, and other such areas by the developer
required by The Reserve Master Association deed
restrictions
· Preservation on individual lots, if used to
mee% the habitat requirement, shall be established by the
developer through permanent restrictions set forth by the
homeowners associations. The annual report shall also
include copies of deed or other restrictions assurinc
preservation of pine flatwoods acreage. -
Prior to commencement of clearing activities-on any portion
of the Reset'ye site, the Developer m~t Prepare and 'have
approved a plan for surveying for'and protectin~ in situ, or
relocating into a suitable on-site preserve ares al! gopher
tortoise and, if gopher tortoise burrows:"are:found;-.:Florida
mouse, gopher frog, and Eastern Indigo snake, that are
determined to exist on parcels to be developed. The plan,
shall be reviewed and approved by Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council in consultation with the Florida Game and
Fresh Water Fish Commission and the U~$. Fish and Wildlife
ServiCeo After approval of the Plan~ specific parcels may
be cleared and developed su~j-ect to~ compliance with the
In the event that it is determined that any additional
representative of a plant or animal species of special
regional concern (as defined in the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council Assessment Report for The Reserve
Development of Regional Impact) is resident~on, or otherwise
is significantly dependent upon, The Reserve Development of
Regional Impact property, the developer shall cease all
activities which might negatively affect that individual
population and immediately notify both the Florida Game and
Fresh Water Fish Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service. Proper protection, to the satisfaction of both
agencies, shall be provided by the developer.
20.
Prior to' any construction in Phase II of t
~u~e~l~, ~z~llan Pepper, and Austra?~a3e~v~Pm~t'
__ ~.=~e s~a±l be removed Removal ~ ? ~ wnlcn
manner t~a~ avoids seed di-~- ~ - ~ De in such a
There shall m ~~ ...... Y. ~ ~ f these species.
be no ~~N oz ~nese species on site.
DRAINAGE
21. The developer shall design ~n~ constru~.?;the stormwater
management system to retain the maximum volumes of water
con~istent with providing ~flood protection. The system
shall be designed and constructed to retain, or detai~ with
filtration, as a minimum, the first one inch of runoff or
the runoff from a one-hour, three-year storm event,.
whichever ~s grea~er. Required retention volumes may be
accommodated in a combination of vegetated swales, dry
retention areas, lakes with vegetated littoral zones, or
other suitable retention structures discharges from
the surface water management syste~: meet the water
quality standards of Florida Administrative COde Rule 17-3.
Under no circumstances shall post-development runoff volumes
exceed predevelopment runoff volumes for a storm event of
th~"ee-day duration and .25-year re't-u~-~ frequency.
The developer s-~ai1 design and construct
the surface water
management system such that m '
hydroperlods within re'stor~ -~~ntenance of normal
p~eservea, and created
wetlands can be guaranteed a,ga~st the negative impacts of
actzvities within the pro3ect boundaries, and that the
functions and values provided b~ 'th.es,e habitats~ will be ........ ._
maintained. Under no circumstances shai%-~nfiltered runoff
from impervious surfaces and parkim-U..~ar_eas be diverted
directly into wetlands on site. FinaI'~"d~ainage plans shall
be submitted to South Florida Water Mana~ement District, St.
Lucie Count~, the Cit~3 of Port St. Lucie,, and'~the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council. At a m~!n~mum' such plans
shall depict how preserved and created wetla31d areas Will be
22.
300~.
14
viability and health of the littoral zone. The littoral zone
as established shall consist entirely of native vegetation
and shall be maintained permanently as part of the water
management system. As a minimum, ten square feet of
vegetated littoral zone per linear foot of lake shoreline
shall be established. The plan shall be subject to approval
by St. Lucie County, the City of Port St. Lucie, South
Florida Water Management District and the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council prior to the beginning of any
excavation activity. Littoral zones shall be constructed
concurrent with lake excavation and final grading.
Operational permits for the surface water.management system
shall not be issued until such time as the littoral zones
have been constructed and inspected.
Not wi'thstanding the foregoing, a spec~a1 Plan shall be
~u~mmtted for. the exmsting borrow pits littoral zone, taking
~ ~of mattCi°n~n' ' ~he~ % xiPsht~ ~c ~rr~ %~ ~ aw~li ~~ nztO nes.in
WATER SUPPLY:
POTABLE AND NONPOTABLE WATER-''
26. The prima~y source of golf course irrigation water shall be
treated wastewater effluent. The on.!y~ other source of golf
course irrigation water allowable shall be water derived
from the surface water management system of lakes. No
withdrawals from lakes shall be Permitted which would
adversely affect wetlands required by the Development Order
to be preserved on-site, or wetlands and littoral zones
created on site as mitigation for wetland functions and
values lost as a result of this development.
Withdrawals from existing surficia! aquifer wells for the
purpose of supplying irrigation water to existing golf
courses shall cease by January I, 1991. The continued or
proposed use of surficial aquifer wells to supply irrigation
water to golf courses beyond January l, 1991, shall
constitute a substantial deviation ~pursuant to Section
380.06, Florida Statutes, and shall ~eqUi're'"'further-review.
27 Construction of additional golf courses ~eYond those_already_
cons~cted shall not occur_ ~tii_.it c~_be
the satisfaction of the South Florid.a~,,Water Management
District that sufficient irrigation water can ~be.-deri~ed on
a sustainable basis from wastewater sources and surface
water management system lakes to provide for irrigation
requirements without adversely affecting wetlands required
by the Development Order to be pr~Served on site, or
wetlands and littoral zones crested, on site as mitigation
for wetland functions and val~ues ios~ as a result of this
development.
36.
37.
38~
No building permits shall be issued for The Reserve
Development of Regional Impact beyond construction
authorized by the Development Agreement executed by the
Department of Community Affairs, until the South Florida
Water Management District notifies St. Lucie County and the
City of Port St.- Lucie in writing that the method of
providing potable and nonpotable water needs to such further
development proposed by the
and wilt
not have adverse impacts to: 1) wetlands required by the
Development Order to be preserved on "sit~e or wetlands and
littoral zones created on site as mitigation for wetland
functions and values lost as a result this d~ opment;
2) the potentiometric head of the idan if
app!ioable; and 3) the ability of existing legal users to
meet their permitted potable and nonpotable requirements.
Parameters and methods of hydrol tic
undertaken to demonstrate that a ent source of water
is available to serve further deVe by the
developer without adversely impacting items lis above
shall be established to the saris ction of the South
Florida Wa~er Management District. .-.
Ail residential, commercial and ind ~ i:.: '
requirements shal~ ~ .......... us~mxal water and sewer
~ ~= ~upp&le~ Dy the'a ¢o~mon Utility which
shall provide water and sewer service to all existing and
proposed development, except Sable Creek Phases I, il, and
iV, and Reserve Plantation I, IIA, and IIB, which contain
tots which are in excess of the minimum requirements of
one-half acre and any lots proposed within Sable Creek Phase
il! (56. acre parcel) providing such lots be at least one
acre in size. At such time and in the event water and/or
sewer lines are made available to lots contained the
subdivisions referenced herein, they shall be required to
hook up to the common untility service then provided by the
u~ility company.
Any consents or other approvals requi~sd-from the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council and/or in consultation with
other governmental agencies,--as a condition to further
development approvals being issued afte~ the effective date
of the development order,_-shall not ~be sub3ect to
unreasonable delay-afte.r~.all submissions and other data
required by such'~agency '(including TCRPC) from developer,
has been supplied.-__. .
Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the
continued proper operation of all components of the central
water supply system shall be the~financial and Physical
responsibility of The Reserve Utilities~ Corporation until
such time as it may be conveyed t~ ano%'~r entity. Any
entities subsequently authorized to~ep~a~The ~ ye
41.
c. When flows reach 75% capacity, c°hStruction shall begin
and be completed and certified prio~ to flows reaching
95% of }ermitted capacity.
The existing and proposed wastewater treatment and disposal
system shall be constructed or modified to produce
irrigation quality water so that spray irrigation of such
water Will be the primary wastewater disposal method.
Excess was~ewater may be disposed of through percolation
ponds, as ~permitted.
42.
Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the
continued proper operation of all components of the central
wastewater treatment system shall be the -financial and
physical responsibility of The Reserve-~JUti!ities Corporation
until such time as conveyed to another entity. Any entities
subsequently authorized to replace The Reserve Utilities
Corporation shall be required, au a minimum, to assume the
responsibilities OUtlined above or delegate such
responsibilities to another entity to the satisfaction of
St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ~ WASTE
43.
Within three months of the effsctive -date of the Development.-
Order (the e'ar!ie~
Orders are issued by°f ~wo dates if'~sep-arate-Devetopment
St. Lucie County ~nd the City of Port
St~ Lucie)~ the developer shall submit a hazardous materials
management plan for review and approval by the ~City of Port
St. Lucie, St. Lucie County, and the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council in consultation with the South Florida
Water Management District and the Department of
Environmental Regulation. If said approval is not obtained
within six months of the effective date of the Development
Order, no further building perm/ts shal~ be issued for any
shall:part of the Project until approval is obtained. The plan
require disclosure by all owners or tenants of non--
residential property of all ..... .haza~dgus materials
proposed to be stored used 7'°'r' generated on the
Premises; ...... .: ' ,
require ~nspection of all'bus.ness' premises storing,
using, or generating hazardous materials Prior to the
commencement of operation, and periodicall~,
to assure that adequate facilities and procedures~ thereafter are
in place to properly manage haz mrdous materials
projected to occur;
2O
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
46.
The developer shall reserve a minimum of eight acres of land
deeded free and clear of all liens an
in four parcels no less than two acres each in size to be
homeowners' associations d encumbrances to
Re ion - wmthln The Reserve Develo me
g. . a.1 Impact for th .... ~ ...... P nt of
~ ~ =~u~u~snment of recreational
development, n living within t
fac~llties geared to the needs of childre he
Parcels shall be reserved in an arrangement
that will most conveniently serve the most residents based
on proximity of residential areas. The developer shall
establish a fund of not less than $5,000 for each parcel to
be turned over to the appropriate homeowners, association to
provide initial funding for facilities on each parcel. The
appropriate equipment or facilities to be developed on each
parcel shall be determined by the homeowners, associaition.
47.
Within one year of the effective date of the Development
Order (the latter of two dates .if s~parate
Orders are issued by St. Lucie County ~nd the-Development .
St. Lucie), the developer shall City of Port
provide a plan for the
provision of beach access points a~d _parking facilities to
meet the demand created by residen~ia~ development in The
Reserve Development of Regional impa~-. The plan shall
include an evaluation and estimate of demand for beach
access points in both St. Lucie and
methodology Used to Project beach acce~
shall be agreed upon by_the developer
prior to plan initiation_and shall be
the completed plan. The plan shall
be constructed and available to se~
.... ': ....... ~'-' accordance with the"':approved plan. Sub-
improvements required of the Developer
proportion to the level of service
available by the respective Counties for
Counties. The
and parking demand
apProving.'agencies
ed as part of
St. Lucie Count~, Martin County, and ~he a program for
meeting any pro3ected demand. The plan must be approved by
Regional Planning Council. . Treasure Coast
within two vear~ ~ .... ~ apPrOval is not obtained
~ ~o ~ ~ne effect!ye datei of the Development
Order as aforementioned, no further .ding permits shall
be. issued for any part of the pro3 .until approval is
obtained. Beach access points ~nd D~ facilities shall
ected-demand in
POLICE AA~D PUBLIC SAFETY
oregoinNy.
not exceed, in
facilities made
resi dents
48.
Prior to the issuance of any building permits, in any
portion of this project in .the. unincorporated areas of St.
Lucie County, the following assessment shall be paid for the
purpose of police'/public safety:
maximum eXten~t feasible, incorporate ~asures identified in
the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Regional
Energy Plan dated May, 1979, and the Treasure Coast Regional
Plarming COunci2's Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan. As a
minimum, the developer shall demonstrate that incorporation
of energy conservstion measures already committed to and
those measures to be incorporated b~ the requirement of
Condition 2 below has reduced pro3ected energy demand by 20
percent below that demand which would have occurred without
incorporation of the measures~
The developer shall incorporate each of the l? energy saving
methods outlined in the ENERGy section discussion of the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Assessment Report
for Th'e Reserve Development of Regional Impact unless it can
be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council that individually each method is
not cost effective.
TRANSPORTATION
52. No building permits shall be issued after the-effective date
of the Development Order (the earlier of two dates if
separate Development Orders are issued by St. Lucie County
and the Ci-~ar of Port St. Lucie) for the Reserve Development
Of Regional Impact until the necessary right-of-way owned by
Callaway Land & Cattle Company along the westerly extension
of Prima Vista Boulevard has been dedicated free and clear
of all liens and encumbrances to St. Lucie Coun-~ or Florida
Depal~cment of Transportation as necessary and consistent
with the St. Lucie County Thoroughfare Plan for Prima Vista
Boulevard, and intersections thereof, ~md as necessa~.r to
provide for ultimate laneage of Prima ,Vista Boulevard.
53. Prima Vista Boulevard, west of 1-95, shal2 be designed as a
Primary public access route extending from the 1-95
intsrchange to the west/southwest property lines of The
Reserve Development-~f__R. egional Impact,. and--~ppr~pr_i~_te
right-of-wap shall be dedicated to PrOvide for such an
alignment. Design and construction of the roadway shall
maintain acceptable levels of service on both Prima Vista
Boulevard and 1-95 and meet the requirements of the Florida
Department of Transportation
Administration. .and ~-the Federal Highway
54.
No building permits for non-industriai~deve!opment of more
than 225 residential (1395 daily ~trips)units shall be
issued for The Reserve Development of' Regi6nal Impact until
contracts have been let for the constru-~ion of intersection
improvements to obtain the folloWin~ R
a) W~s~ Midway Road and Glades ~U,tLOff Road
Northbound Glades Cut-off Road Eastbound West Mid~v Roa~
One left-turn lane~ - One left-turn l~e~
One through lane
One right-turn lane* One through lane
One right-turn lane*
Southbound G!9~e~ Cut-off Road Westbound West MidwaR~_~
One left turn lane *
One left-turn lane*
One through/right-turn lane One through lane
One right-turn lane*
· Improvements beyond current configuration.
56.
All above configurations, inCluding S%gnaliza~ion as
warranted, shall be permitted and constructed. ih accordance
with city, county, or state criteria, as applicable.
No building Permits shall be issued for more than 448 (2,778
daily trips) residential units and 95,000 square feet of
industrial development (526 daily trips) or after twelve
(12) months from the effective date-of this Development
Order unless the improvements listed under a) above have
been let for construction.
Should the developer fail to comply with items (1), (2), and
(3) listed below within the time period specified below, the
County may call said Letter_ of Cl-edit Go complete.2_the
improvement of a) above: .....
(1) Design complete within six (6) months of the
effective date of the Development Order.
(2) Permitting complete within nine (9) months of the
effective date of the Development Order°
($) Construction commencing, within eighteen (18)
months of the effective date of the Development
Order. - ..............
No Certificates of Occupancy shall -be~ issued for m
95,000 square feet of industrial d~L .... ore than
trips) and 448 resi =~=xopment (526 daily
dential units (27~8 daiiy trips) of the
Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the
intersection improvements under Paragraph (a.) above has been
completed.
i~o building permits for non-ind s ' .
~ssue~ for more th=~ ~ ~ ~ ~rlal development mh=~ ~
con%rJct~ ~JJ~ ~eserve Development of ae~"~t~ lo,o/= daily
~ ~,=v~ oeen let for the c .... ~ ?~=x xmpact until
u~'~ruc~lon of intersection
26
629
58.
No building permits shall be issued for industrial
development of more than 250,000 (1,383 daily trips) square
feet of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until
contracts have been let for the following roadway
improvements, including all necessary bridge structures
(development level thresholds may be increased if it is
demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that
additional development may be accommodated without exceeding
Level of Serve "D" peak hour~
or Level of
Service "C" under average annual dail. one):
a)
West Midway Road and South 25th Street' (St. James
Drive)
Northbound 'South 25th St.
One left-~ur~ lane -
One through lane
One right-turn lane*
Southbound South 25th St.
One ~ ~
~e~ ~-turn lane
Second left-turn lane*
One left-turn lane*
One throdgh lane
Second through lane*
One right-turn lane*
One through l~ne
One through lane Second t~ou~h lane*
One right-turn lane* One right-~urn lane
*~m~rovement beyond current configuration._
No Certificates of Occupancy for i
more than 250 000 ~ ~g~ ~ . . ndustria! deveto~
, ~,ooo uai±lv ~r~- . =men/ of
~serve Development Of Reg~ona!-I~:~V) .square feet of The
,~ r~adway improvement u~de- ~ P~b% Sngll be issued ~ntil
~ ve±opment level thresho!~- ~ - ~ve nas been-completed
s may De increased if it is
demonstrated throuch the traffic monitoring program +hat
additional development may be acc
Level of Se~ .... ,, . ~ ommodated w" -
S~-~ ,,~,J-'T-= m peak hour ~.~.Sj~,Ithout exceedln
- ~= ~ under aver~ = ...... ,_ ~_~ s~ason, or L
59. No building permits shall be-issued_~0r' ~ ion~industria1
development of m°Te'~han-1,-494-res!dential unlts- (9%073
daily trips), a 150-room hotel .(.1 261 .daily -trips), 65,000
square feet of , - _
commercial '(5,616 .daily trips), and
square feet of off~ce (556 daily trips) of 30 000 '
The Reserve
Development of Regional Impact until COntracts have been let
for the following roadway improvements, including all
necessary bridge structures (development level thresholds
may be increased if it is
demonstrated~hrough the traffic
monitoring Program that additional development can be
accommodated without exceeding Le%el '~Of-Service~_-· ~. ~ "D" Peak
(3)
(4)
Southbound - one right-turn lane.
Southbound - second left-turn lane.
*ln~ersectign improvements beyond current configuration.
*~Oniy required if development access exists.
61.
Ail of the above configurations shall be Permitted and
constructed in accordance with city, county,
criteria, as applicable, or State
No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for any non-
industrial development of more than 1,4~94 .residential units
(9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips),
65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and
30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of The
Reserve Development of Regional ~-'~Impact until the
improvements under a) and b) above have been completed.
NO building permits shall be is
~ey~lopment of more than ] ~n- su~ ifg{ non-industrial
- _ ~ o~ commercial (5,616 d_~: i ~"~ ~rzps), 65,000
±eet of office (556 dail- L,Z iP% and 30,000
~evezopment of Regional im~=~ ,,-~ ~I~) O~ ~-he Reserv
for t . --~ u~ml con ~ e
he foliowln~ ~ ...... t~acts have been
signalization' modi~ii~L~~ec~lOn~ux improvements · in~¥[~%uu
state crite~i~ -- on~ as warrantedlby city ......
.... ~ --, ~- ~ a~ica~ , _~ ,_-- ~, ~u~L~Z, O
~nresnolds may be'-.~-~tt-g t~?-~ ~ev~iopment level ..
the traffic monitoring Program that additional development
- -° u,emons~rated
can be accommodated without__exceeding-Level of. Service "D"
Peak hour, peak season, or Level of !Service "C" under
average annual daily Conditions):
a)
Sa:-Shore SZvd
One left-turn ~a~¥ '
One through/right-turn lane
One right-turn .lane
One through lane -- One 1~_
One right-turn lane One through lane*- -'
One through/right-turn lane
*intersection improvements beyond curren~
3O
one lef~~
Second ie.ft~turn lane*
One through~lane ....
Second through ~ane* ....................
configuration.
a)
Prima Vista and West Peacoc~iBoulevard
Northbound West Peacock B/vd
One ief~-turn lane**
One through !ane*~
One right-turn lane**
Southbound West Peacock Blvd.
One left-t-~n lane
Second left-turn lane*
One through lane
One right-turn lane
Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd.
One left-t-~-~rnlane
Second left-~urn lane*
One through lane
Second through lane
One through/right-turn lane
~~nd~: Prima Vist9 Blvd
Three through lanes
Fourth through lane*
One right-turn lane
b)
Second left-turn lane~
One through lane
One right-turn lane
ne left-turn lane
One through lane
One right-turn lane_
Prima Vista Boulevard and California Boulevard
One l~~
Second left-turn lane*
Two through lanes
Third through lane*
One right-Turn lane
~_~u~d. Prima Vista B!vd
One l~
Two through lanes
Third 'through.lane.
One right-t~rn lane
c) Prima Vista Boulevard and Cashmere BOUlevard
une le£t-tu~n l~-~
One through lane
One right-turn lane
une left-~
Second left-turn lane*
One through lane
One right_turn lane
Second right_turn lane*
Third through lane*
One right-turn lane
.......... ~n~'Prima Vista Blvd.
One ~ ....
Two through lanes
Third, i lane*..
One ri, 'lane ...........
d)
One ~_
One left-turn lane*
West Midway Road and East TOrino Parkway
.west !dwav Road
Second through lane*
One right-turn lane*
32 500~
66.
uemons~rated through the traffic m
onltor&ng P~ogram that
additional development can be accommodated Without exceeding
Level of Service °'D" peak hour, peak season, or Level of
Service "C" under average annual daily conditions):
a)
Four-lane Glades Cut-off Road from Reserve
Commerce Cen~er (Go Team) entrance to West Midway
Road.
No Certificates of Occupancy shall be.issued for industrial
development more than 750,000 square feet (3,809 daily
trips) The Reserve Development of RegiOnaI Impact until the
improvement under paragraph (a) above has been completed.
No building permits Shall be iSSued for industrial
development of more than 750,000 square feet (3,809 daily
trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until
contracts have been let for the following improvement
(development level of thresholds may be increased if it is
demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that
additional development can be
Level of Service "D" accommodated without exceeding
, peak hour, peak season, or Level of
Service C" under average annual daily conditions):
a)TeamGladesparkway)CUt-°ff Road and Commerce Center Drive (Go-
One through lane
One right-turn lane
One left-turn l~ne
Second left-turn lane*
One through l~ne
~3~tbound Commerce C~nter Dr.
one lef~ .
One right,tUrn lane
*Improvements ~eyond current ....... -""
configuration? .........
N/A = Not aPplicable .....
67.
NO Certificates-of Occupancy-shall be"issued--for-industrial
development of more than 750,000 Square feet (3,809 daily
trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until
the improvement under Paragraph .(a) above has been
compl'eted. .
No building Permits shall be iSSued for development of more
thresholds may be ~ncreased if it i~"demonstrated through
the traffic monitoring program that 'additional development
can be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "Dx
peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service "C" under
average annual daily conditions):
a)
Eight-lane Prima Vista Boulevard from West Peacock
Boulevard to California Boulevard.
No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for development
of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a
250-room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of
commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of
office (i,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of
industrial development (5524 daily tri'ps) of The Reserve
Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under
a) above has been completed.
69.
No building permits shall be issued for~.development of more
than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily~trips), a 250-
room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of
commercial (13,480 daily trips), !00,000 square feet of
office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of
industrial development (5524 daily trips) of The Reserve
Development of Regional Impact ~ '
un~_l contracts have been let
for the construction of intersection improvements to obtain
the following configuration, including signalization or
signalization modifi.cation.~as .warranted by-city, county, or
State criteria, as applicable:
a)
Northbound California Blvd.
One left-turn lane*
One through/right-turn lane
Southbound California Blvd.
One left--~-urn lane* --
-One through/right-turn lane.
California Boulevard and North Peacock Boulevard
Eastb°~nd_.North Peacock B!vd
One ~--eft-turn lane* -'-~
One through~right-turn lane
---Westbound North p~acock Blvd.
One approach lane
b)
Northbound California Blvd.
Two lef~nes
One through lane
Second through lane~
One right-turn lane
Southbound California Blvd.
Prima Vista BOulBvmrd 'and-California Boulevard_
Eastbound Prima Vis~ B!vd
--- -
..... ~*~ xanes
Three through lanes
Fourth through lane*
One right~turn~'~ane
Westbound Prima-Vista Blvd_ ._
g)
Northbound Ba~shore Blvd.
One left-turn lane*
One through/right-turn lane
West Virginia Drive and Bays~o~e Boulevard
Southbound ~~
~e i-~-tu~n ian~*
One through/right turn lane
~West Virginia Drive
One l~
Two through lanes*
One right-turn lane*
~_~u~nd. Wes~ V~r ini~ Drive
Aa Driv~
Two through lanes~
One riUht_turn lane*
h)
Northbound'West Torino Parkwa_~
One approach lane
Southbound West Torino Parkway
One left-turn lane* ~
One through lane
West Torino Parkway and Torino Parkway
Eastbound Torino Parkwa~
West_b_o~und 'TorinO Parkway
*Intersection improvements beyond current
N/A = not applicable
configuration.
70.
71.
All above configurations shs!l be permitted and constructed
in accordance with city COunty, .or state criteria as
applicable. -
No Certificates of Occupancy shall be iSSued for development
of more than 3,400 residential units (19,41! daily trips), a
25D-room hotel (214i daily trips), 250,000 square feet of
commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 Square feet of
office (!,S72 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of
industrial development (5524 daily trips) of The Reserve
Development of Regional Impact until the intersection
improvements under paragraphs (a) through (h) above, have
been completed.
All prO3ect entrance intersection configurations Shall
main~sin Council.s objective level of service Standards Ali
project entrance-intersection.
config~a~ions,~
Florida East Coast Railway crossi~s,.at GlinCluding any
RQDd/Reserve Boulevard -and at '.Glades'! C~t-off Road/Reserve
· ades Cut-off
Commerce Center (Go Team) entrance, shall be~ apprOved as
appropriate by the City of Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County,
Florida Department of Transportation, ~Orida East Coast
Railway~ and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
As a minimum, the
Deveto~ern shall:' Pay a fair share
NO' Certificates 'Of Occupancy shall b~l~ iSSued for any non
industrial development of more th
, you square feet of ~' ...... --r- ~'~ Call tr' _
~L~uuu_square feet of ind,,~+~L~'~.~z sa~ly trips) a~
~ ~-Pz'ovements u~,~ .... ~ ~. ~ ~eglonal Im : ~
'~=~ paragraph ~aQ _~ pact until
completed. %-~ above have been
74.
Intersection improvements identified in a) bet~wshaL!~ be
constructed concurrent with the northerly COnnection of
Cashmere Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard.
a)
One through lane*
One right-turn lane
Sou. t~h~b~o~n? Cas~hmere BI vd
One left-turn lane '
One through lane
One right-turn lane*
Prima Vista Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard
~-~u~Sd,Prima Vista B!vd
Two through lanes
One right, turn lane
One ie~t_tUrn lane '
Two through lanes
One right-~urn lane
*Improvements beyond CUrrent configuration.
75.
No further building permit ~ _.
shall be iSSued in ~ S_fo~ non mndustrial
_connection of Cashmere ~f~.=,_~es_erve after the
open ~o t~.._ . . ~uxevarG to ~--< ......
been completed, e ~mprovements under a ) a~j~r~-~s~ve
Commencing in January of 1990, the The Developer may undertake
an annual monitoring program.a traffic%rRffic monitoring
Program shall be conducted by engineering
that is qualifiedin F(3.05),"bY the Florida Department firmof
Transportation Traffic Operation-'Studies, and
~(3.06), Traffic Operation Desi~, or an equivalent. _
If the monitoring program is 'selected~"-it must be commenced-
in January, 1989 and main%ainedcountyOn an.a annual basis. The
developer shall-submit to the traffic- monitoring
report along with The Reserve,s Annual Development Report.
The report shall present existing counts and traffic
~onditions, including all analysis; Specifying any
mmprovements necessary to PrOVide Level of-Service "C" for
annual average daily traffic COnditions~and Level of Ser%-ice
"D" for peak season peak hour COnditi~onsi~ The report Will
identify any exceedance and construction, dates as defined
oo 6¢9 936
76.
count shall be made on each link. Co-~encing in January of
1991, the monitoring program will pro3ect traffic demands
for each link using historical traffic grow-th data from the
monitoring program and considering projected development
within The Reserve. Forecasts will be made for a three-year
period. When a link is pro3ected to exceed its existing
service volume for Level of Service "C" or "D" during the
three-year period, the month and year for such exceedance
will be estimated (exceedance date).
a) Building permits for non-industrial development in
excess of the levels shown in Table I may be issued for The
Reserve if it is shown in the Traffic Monitoring Program
that Level of Se~~ice "C" for annual average daily traffic
and Level of Service "D" for peak season, peak hour traffic
can be maintained with additional Reserve development.
When an exceedance date is determined, building permits
for development shall not be issued after the construction
date until the needed improvement is let for constr~ctiono
The construction date is defined as twelve (12) months prior
to the exceedance date for roadway improvements and eighteen
(18) months prior to the exceedance date for bridge
improvements. Design and permitting of these improvements
must be completed by the construction date.
When an e~ceedance date is dete-~ined, Ce~tifica~es of
Occupancy shall not be issued a~l~A~
until the improvemen~ is complete.~=~ the exceedance date
b) Building Pe-~mits for indus~ri~D~,~de~elopment~j~u -excess ......
of the levels shown in Table Z7 may be issued for The
Reserve if it is shown in the Traffic Monitoring Program
that Level cf Service ~C" for annual average daily traffic
and Level of Service "D" for peak season, peak hour traffic
can be maintained with ~additional Reserve development.
When an exceedance date is dete~mined~ building Permits
for development shall not be issued after the construction
d~te un~l the needed improvement is let for construction.
The construction date is defined ,as twelve (12) months prior
to the exc~ date. for roadway improvements and eighteen
(18) month: prior to the exceedance date for bridge
improvements Design and permitting of these improvements
must be by the construction da~e~
When . . ' '-
until the improvement is complete. '
Commencing in January, 1990, the developer may undertake an
annual monitoring Program of the 1-95/Prima Vista Boulevard
interchange. The traffic monitoring program shall be
conducted by a traffic engineering firm that is qualified by
a)
b)
c)
Addition of a two-lane parallel structure.
Northbound right-turn lane.
Southbound right-turn lane.
Second southbound left-turn lane.
When an exceedance date is determined, Certificate of
Occupancy .Shall not be issued after the exceedance date
until the imprOvement is complete.
77.
No additional building permits shall be issued after
December 31. 2005, unless a traffic study has been conducted
by the Developer, submitted to and approved by the City of
Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County, Florida Department of
Transportation, and Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council, which demonstrates that the regional roadway
network can accommodate a specified amount of additional
Reserve Develo
of .Regional Impact generated, traffic
growth in 'round traffic beyond 2005 and can sti~l and
be
maintained Level of Service "C" during average annual
daily traffic conditions and Level of Service "D" during
peak hour. peak season conditions.
a)
Be conducted in Year 2005.
The t- = ~
~a~f~c study shall:
b} improvements and timineg of those
,, necessary to provid Level of
Service C" under average annual dai~y
operating, conditions and Level of Se-vice "D"
under hour, peak season operating
conditi for the subject trans~oftatio~
network during the projected comple~ion
the project, including project impacts and
growth in background traffic.
Additional
permits shall not be issued until a new
Project program and roadway improvement PrOgram
necessary to acceptable levels of service have been
approved by City of Port St. Lucie,. St. Lucie County,
Florida Department of Transportation, and Treasure Coast
development.Regional Planning Council for the remainder of the
HOUSING
78.
Prior to application for building permits for any hotel
co~aercia!,
al, or residential~ development in '
Reserve Dev~ ~ent of R.egional '~'I'mD!act b - The
authorized in the Preliminary D~~i . . eyond -that
developer shall provide an estimate Qf the number of
...... ~'"=n~'~l'~reement, the
44
P~,c[£ODO
St~ Lucie City Planner, as appropriate~ fox>a determination by
the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County/City
Council of the City of Port St. Lucie, as to whether the change
constitutes a substantial deviation as provided in Section
380.06(19), Florida Statutes. The Board of Commissioners of St.
Lucie County/City Council of the City of Port St~ Lucie, as
appropriate, shall make its determination of substantial
deviation at a public hearing after notice to the developer.
D. St. Lucie County/the City of Port St. Lucie shall
monitor the development of the Project to ensure compliance with
this Development Order. The St. Lucie County Community
Development DireCtor and/or the City of Port St. Lucie City
Planner, as appropriate, sha!l be the local official assigned
the responsibi!ity~for monitoring the development and enforcing
the terms of the Development Order. The Community Development
Director/City Planner may require periodic reports of the
developer with regard to any item set forth in this Development
Order.
E. The developer shall make an annual report as required by
Section 380.06(18), Florida Statutes. The annual report shall be
submitted each year:
on the anniversary date of the adoption, the
earlier date if two separate orders are-adopted, of this amended
Development Order shall include the fOllowing:
i. y
Deve]
repoz
~anges in the plan of development, or in the
:entations contained in the ApPlication for
~pment Approval, or in the phasing for the
lng year a~d for the n~xt year;
46
F. The definitions found in Chapter 380, Florida ~tatutes,
shall apply to this amended Development Order.
Go St. Lucie County hereby agrees that prior to March 14,
2009 The Reserve Development of Regional Impact shall no~ be
subject to down zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity
reduction, unless the County/City, as appropriate, demonstrates
that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the
approval of the amended Development Order have occurred, or that
the amended Development Order was based on substantially
inaccurate information provided by the developer, or that ~he
ch~ge is clearly established by St. Lucie County/the Cindy of
Port St. Lucie to be essential to the public health, safety, or
welfare.
H. This amended Development Order shall be _binding upon
the developer and its assignees or.successors in interest. It is
reference herein to any governmental agency
to mean any future instrumentality which may
be created and designated as successor in interest to, or which
otherwise possesses any of the powers and duties of any
on the effective date
I. The approval granted by this amended Development Order
is · · ~
cond~tlona!, and shall not be construed to obviate the duty of
the developer to comply with all other applicable local, State,
and federal permitting requirements~
944
48
70
After a motion and second, the vote on "%~±s resolution was as
follows:
Chairman Judy Culpepper
Vice-Chairman Havert Fenn
Commissioner Jim Minix
Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner
Commissioner Jack Kreiger
AYE
.AYE
AYE
AYE
ABSENT
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED, this 14th day of March, 1989
BOARD OF CO - ;. ~?'~ ::'-J -: 9.'-
~T. LUCIE C0~y, FLORIDA /~>~-~;"_.~'..:.~.f~ 5.
~~~~%-..~':5: "'2%~T-.~:~.,-~.- L~ ,~
?"~~ ~~' APPROV~ AS TO ...... ,~'~." -
CORRE CTNES S ':
~..' ' ~-~7 -;;;:.~,~,:. ='F ~-c' --.., 'COUNTY A~ORNE~
~...~ . - _ ,~; ~.'.~ .
'-.. ,',~T~' ' .-~, -. ,~ ?-
RZ89-73b
( RES ER%~ )
clean copy
629
DESCf::917?, 1II OFFICIAL RECORDS .::OOt' 3-19o I"AGES '";'1-506 ~UBL]C
RECO~.]D~ OF ST_ LUCIE COUNTy. I'I.ORIDA ~ND f;OU]'HEt~S':TE~Ly AL:}rzG T{I;~
NO~T~iKRi. Y L'NK OF TllaT PARCEL OF LAND DESCPIBED IN zvtlCiAL
-"" _c.. ~ -:. PA.3 ] . 3- 2 095 AND Tile EPUTIIE~Ly LINg C-F T~{AT
NECO,.,L-, D"-'" ~ '. ES 0~, -
2086. PUBL]C NECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY F[-OR~DA.
TiIENCE SOUTtt 43'34'09- EAST. 5340.4? FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 45'08'~0' EAST. 5082.O7 FEET; THENCE SOUT~
46'44'37' WEST. 126!.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43'08'26'
EAST. 273.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40'58'54' EAST.
959.07 FEET: THENCE NO~TH 61'5i'~4" EAST 61~oO4
FEET: .
THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLy LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND
WESTERLY LINE OF PARCELS OF LAND 'DESCRIBED IN A LAND E~iCHANGE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE C0. AND PEACOCK FRUIT-
LAND CO. THE FOLt.OWlNG COURSES AND DISTANCES:
THENCE SOUTH 43'08'22- EAST. 1588.47 FE~: THENCE
SOUTH S7'!3'0~' EAST -,
- ~8~.04 FEE'T; THENCE SOUTH
B8'5~'5~' FAST, 759.2! F~S_ET; THENCE NORTH
EAST. 134.$? FEET: .T0 A POINT ON THE ~EST~--RLy LiNE OF
A 'FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. EASEMENT RECORDED
OFFICIAL RECO BOOK 468 PAGES 2897 .....
~ECORDS OF ST. LUCZE COUNTY. FLORIDA; NO~TH
79'27'$6~ EAS~ ALONG SAID WESTERLY EA =~
SS.S! FEET; NORTH !9.'2S-24~ EAST ALONG SAiD
~ESTERLY EAS~ LINE.
A DISTANCE.OF 6S3.65 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 12'2S'5S- EAST, ALONG SAiD ~ESTERLY
EASEMENT LINE. A DISTANCE OF 640.99 ~E~"/:
NORTH 04'5~'26 EAST. ALONG SAID WES EASE/~ENT
LINE A DIS OF 637o-01 FEET TO A
~ESTF~iy LINE ON THE
OF A FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.- ~
AS RECORDED tN OFFICIAL R~CORDc BOOK 97.
~c ~:CORD£ ~?-$T. L~CIE CO~2r~. ~LORIDA_
~UNG THE WESTEiRLY L~N~ A~ c~ ~.~ ' ; THENCE
C0. EAS~M~N~ ~,k .... -~ ...... ~ ~RIDA PO~ER & LIGHT
........ u =n~ wESTERLY LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER
& LIGHT CO.
EASEMENT RECORDED iN 'OFFICIAL RECORDS.
BOOK 120. pAGE '--!99-'PUBLIC'RECORDS 'oF' ST. - LUCIE --
COUNTY. FLORIDA. NORTH 00'00'Il- EAST. A DISTANCE OF
22~4.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECT]ON WITH THE
wESTERLY RIGHT - OF- WAy 'LINE OF THE PROPOSED
!NTERCHANGE OF; STATE ROAD 9 (INTERSTATE 1-95) AS
SHO~N AND DESCriBED ON A BOUNDARy SURU~y MAP PREPARED
BY ST. LUCIE iWEST'" TR'O~I^S' O: ....
. _ ~VELOPmENT .......
CORPONnT]0N; S]~GNED AND SEALED BY'DAVID ui BETHAm.
FLORIDA CERT]F]CATJON NUMBER 3~99
!987. - - DATED JUNE 10.
THENCE DEPARTING S~J]D NORTHERLy AND WESTEi~Ly L]N~r O?
EXCHANGE I)aPC ELS - ,~Oit~TIIWKST£RLY - - 'I'H~ LAND
L~NE OF SAID IHT-'~ ....
ALONC TIlE WESTERLY t}lGllT-OF-u;,,y
FOLLOU]NG COURSES AND DISTANCES:
RED cOCKADED WOODPECKER EXHIBIT
A Red-cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan for
The Rese~ve Development of Regional Impact
Introductign
The Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoide~ boreat~s), an
endangered species, has been determined to actively use
portions of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact
(DRI). This report describes current use of the site and
the co~mitted responsibilities of the developers of The
Reserve DR/ to help assure the continued value of the
prope~y ~o this endangered woodpecker species.
A Red-cockaded Woodpecker cavity survey, as required by
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Servicer and Florida Game and Fresh. Water Fish
Commission, was initiated on April !0, 1988. Tine survey was
conducted on ~50-foot transects throughout ~ne site known as
The Rese~;e in St. Lucie County, Florida. Additional
surveys w ~
e~e conducted' by a minimLlm of two field observers
and up to five field observers on each occasion. A total of
160 man-hours were spent on the site su~-vey.
DP,
, oo, 629 78
Po~ent~a~ ~m: a~ct~s- of n~ve!~
On May 1.9, 1988, Dr. Jerome A. Jackson visited The Reserve
in order ~o evaluate the site characteristics,
the
status of the Red-cockaded Woodpecker on the site, and to
present
-recommend management needs for the existing Colonies on the
site. Potential negative impacts of development on the Red-
cockaded Woodpecker include: i) destruction of cavity trees,
2) reduction in quality and/or ~uantity of foraging habitat,
3) isolation of colony sites and cavity trees, 4) disruption
of breeding activities~ 5) reduction of t. he diversity and
stability of the food supply, 6) increased ~Ompetition from
other cavity nesting animals, and 7) deliberate 3ti!ling of
birds.
talThe followingimpacts omaCti°ns will be taken t~ minimize deveiopmen_
the
~eu-cocKaded WoodPecker on The Reserve
DRI: -
Each
tree will be tagged. With.. a permanent,
numbered alUminLlm tag. Al!.known cavity trees Will be
I"-400,
located by survey on a ~ --erial.photograph.
oo 629
areas to the maximum extent possible. In no case shall
less than 20 feet of buffer be left around these trees
for the purpose of minimizing impacts of construction
on Tree survival.
o
Ail construction activities and any planned golf
tournaments that would involve excessive or unusual
activity within 200 feet of active cavity trees will
not occur from April 1 through June 30 withou~ roping
off preserve areas to minimize disturbance during the
Red-cockaded Woodpecker nesting period.
A
mon~or~ng~- program
~I be initia~ed to doc~men~ the
re
P sence or absence of Red-cockaded Woodpecker nesting
during
toting
ornithoiogis~.
~o Treasure Coas~ Regional p~ ....
~ =res~ Water F~ ~ . .
and Wildlife
Each colony will be surveyed a= least twice
15 through June 15. This moni-
be performed by a qualified
Results of the survey shall be provided
Council, Florida
and the U.S. Fish
Contiguous. . . stands, of trees will be maintained to
mlnlmlze the energetic cost. of
foraging and to minimize
the Red Cockaded Woodpecker,s VUlnerabiii~y to aerial
predators- The intent here is to avoid creating
si=ua=ions where colony sites are totally separated
Co
which is on the boundary 0f the property. Such
habitat will be provided via preservation of
habitat to the maximum extent possible and by tree
planting to the extent necessary; and
maintain records indicating the DBH of all pines
removed or killed by natural or unnatural causes
that are equal ~o or greater than four inches DBH~
as well as efforts to replace such losses.
10.
If the number of pines equal to or greater than ten
inches DBH removed or otherwise lost approaches
of pine fores~ habitat available to the
done to dete~ine if losses have been
offset by trees recruited to the ten inches + DBH class
through growtL~. Based on the results of such
reanalvs4s. _ , additional trees will be planted~ or the
number Of trees that may be removed will be modified as
necessary°
ti.
Sta=utes
surveys
ail rec.
above.
The annu~l repo~ submitted 'to Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council as required by Section 380.06, Florida
include .the results_of_all_ monitoring_
by number 6, ab0ve,-~ and a sumumary of
rds of trees removed, reacquired by number
Fhese results shall also'be submitted to the
and Fresh Water Fish Conunission and the
Wildlife Sea--vice annually.
GOPHER TORT~!sE EXI~ZBZT
itl
'YPE A BUFFER
O25' DENSE V~G~'AT~O~
DEVELOPI%,~=NT
J= CORRIDOR
D~'VELOP~ENT POD
61
DEVELOPMENT POD
°~' 639
BOOK
967 ·
TYPE B BUFFER
~o' OPEN RAN¢__~ VEGITATION
0,629 ,;,0~£393 'a~¥ H,qR30 Alt :25
BOOK
,-. ?..: -..: ::
I,.:' ,,~-' 7, F
BITAT
CURRENT ZONING
PUD - RED
AR-1 - BLUE
RS-2 - OREEN
2?-36-39
PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO.j INC,
BY AGENT: REGINA KARNERJ P.L.S,
?ORA CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION ~
FROM AR-1 TO CG
FUTURE LAND USE
SU - BLUE
RL - RED
CG - OREEN
CT - ORANGE
2?-36-39
PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO., INC.
BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER, P.L.S.
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION
FROM AR-1 TO CG ~
Date: 5/23/89 -- ~
Tape: #1, ~2, ~3 convened: 9:10 a.m.
~ adjourned: 4:52 p.m.
(J) Cattle C__O=. (3-0875) - ~ - .... ~um~.~_.
Reference was made to memorandum from Land Development Manager,
addressed to the Board, dated May 15, 1989, re: ' Petition of
Callaway Land and C_.attie__~DC., by Agent: Karner & Associates for a
Change in Zoning~r0m AR_l_1 (Agricultural
~--o C~ ~ (Comae ~ ~-~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ , Residential 1
~ r~ u~nera~ .. ~ du a
~// ~st quadrant, of the in~)-'- ~r P~operty located in
Luci West Blvd. )Bouievard.
e u~rsec~lon of 1-95 & Prima ViSta (St~
Regina Karner was present to request approval of this petition on
behalf .of the Petitioner.
It was moved by Com. Trefetner, seconded by Com. Minix, to adopt
Resolution No. 89-120, a resolution changing the Zoning
Classification of certain property in St. Lucie County, Florida;
and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
(k) ~ Land an~ ~ ~ (3-1027).
Reference- was made to memorandum
~ddressed to the Count~, Ad-~-~. - f.rom Land Development Mana~e~
May 15, 1989, re' ..~f~. m~n~s~ra~or, County Commis,~_
A~.~ .. ' r~Ll~lOn O~ Call~, ..... ~ ..... ~' ~a~ea
?~_~t: ~arner & Associates for i ~=Y ~=na an~ Cattle Co., by
~c.~!~u~al, Residential ] ~ ~%~% ~g ~from
~= =ounnwest quadrant of the
intersection of 1-95 & Prima Vista Boulevard.
Regina Karner was present to request approval of this petition on
behalf of the petitioner.
It ~was moved .by Com. Minix, seconded by Com. Trefelner, to adopt
Resolution No. 89-121, a resolution changing the Zoning-
Classification of certain property in St. Lucie County, Florida;
and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
(1) ~ Land and Cattle ~ (3-1147)
Reference was made to memorandum from Land Development Manager,
addressed to the County Administrator, County Commission, dated
May 15, 1989, re: "Petition of Callaway Land
Agent: Karner & Associates for a Chang~ inandzoningCatt~~bY
(Agricultural. R-ssidential _ 1 du/ac)/~nd PUD/ (P~anned
Development) (Planned Unit Development) The Reserve _
Section II, .. for Pr~erty located on the southeast aids of Gladss
Cutoff(Reserve Road, Section apProximatelYli). 3 miles south of West Midway Road
Regina Karner, on behalf of the petitioner, was present to
request approval of this petition.
It was moved by Com. Trefelner, seconded by Com. Minix, to adopt
Resolution No. 89_~ 43, a resolution granting Preliminary
Development Plan Approval for Section II of the Reserve A Planned
Unit Development; subject to inclusion of those Conditions
Outlined by staff and indicated in Resolution; and
call, motion carried unanimously., upon roll
Date: 5/23/89
Tape: #1, #2,
Commissioners Present: C]
Dale Trefe!ner. (Havert L.
.Meeting; Com. Jack Krieger
Others Present: Dan
County Administrator; Dan
Management and Budget; Tom
Operations; Krista Store
Virta, Community Deve!opm
Development Manager; Jeff
Mal fait, Chief Ri ght.- o f
Durbin, Sheriff, s Office; No.
It was moved by · Com. Tref~
approve the mi nuEes for the
motion carried unanimously.
convened:
adjourned:
9:10 a.m.
4:52 p.m.
~airman Judy Culpepper; Jim Minix; R.
Fenn - Absent - Dallas/Port & Airport
- Absent/Illness. )
[cIntyre, county Attorney and Acting
Kurek, Asst. County Administrator,
Kindred, Asst. CounEy Administrator,
~, Asst. CounTy Attorney; Terry
~nt Director; Dennis Murphy, Land
Kettel er, County Engineer; Joseph
Y Agent; Hazel Harriman and Susan
teen j. McMahon, Deputy Clerk.
seconded by Com. Minix, to
~egular Nesting of May 16, 1989; and
(m) ~ ~ AD~ Ca~ ~ (3-1350)
Reference was made to mem
addressed to tho ~ ...... .?randum from Lan __
May 15 ~o~n ~ ~uun~y Administra or d Development Manage ,
A-~ent' ' ,,~_~=, ~e: "Petition of ~]~.-'--_C°unty Commission d ~
~"2..~arner & Ass~ociat~ ~_~~y Land and Cat~l~ ~ at~d
Sin~l= ~2'~1' Resmdentia.1 _ ~ ~.., ~ng~ _3n Zoning?~
side ~ ~ ~un.ilz,,, for ~-- _ ~ ~**~u uevelonm=n+% _ _,'
~= ~lades Cutoff-aoad~=fJ~f.?f:Y. ~ocated on t~-~r~,+~]'~
Midway Road (Reserve Section III ). Staff proposed that
· =mP~uxlma~ely 3 miles s ..... ~"==un
uuun oI West
Condition No. 5 a. in the Resolution. be reworded to read as
follows: "From the point of intersection with Reserve Boulevard
to the point of intersection with the westerly Prolongation of
the south line of Commercial Tract B south and Prima Vista
Boulevard: A four (4) land divided Roadway,,; it was noted tha5
this change will also have an effect on 5 b.
The following People were presen~ to speak to this issue:
Regina Karner; John Anderson, FDOT.
Mr. Anderson took exception to Reserve Blvd. being the access
Road at the Interchange of 1-95.
Com. Minix made a statement for the record that he appreciates
Mr. Anderson, s statement about the desirability of bringing a
public road to Glades Cutoff Road and that this would have been
the better solution; however, the private developers were
spending their money on the interchange and their needs had to be
addressed, and although his own desires and that of the County, s
were not 100% met at that time, he was in accord in setting the
gate which was very important, as well as making the road turn in
a natural way.
It was, therefore, moved by Corn. Mi nix, Seconded by Com.
Trefelner, go adopt Resolution No. 89-144, a resolution granting
preliminary Development Plan approval for Section III of The
Reserve a Planned Unit Development, amended as outlined by staff;
and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
COMMISSION REVIEW: May 23, 19~9
RESOLUTION NO.: 89-120
FILE NO.: RZ-89-017
AGENDA ITEM:
M E MO RAN D U~
TO:
F ROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
County Administrator
County Commission
Land Development Manager
May 15, 1989
Petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., by Agent:
Karner & Associates for a Change in Zoning 'from AR-1
(Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial
General).
On Tuesday, May 23, 1989, you will. be asked to review a
petition on behalf of Callaway Land and Cattle.Co., .for a change
in zoning from AR-1 to CG, for property located in. the northwest
quadrant of the intersection of 1-95 & Prima Vista BOulevard.. The
rezoning will permit commercial development in association with
The Reserve, Development of Regional Impact.
County staff has reviewed this petition and determined it
consistent with the Land Development Policies of the St. Lucie
County Growth Management Policy Plan.
On Thursday, April 27, 1989, the St. LuCie County Planning-
and-Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this petition. Mr.
John Holcomb presented the petition. After hearing no~ public
comment in favor or opposition to the petition, the Planning and
Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of this
petition.
Attached, you will find a copy of Draft Resolution $89-120,
our original staff report, and the minutes of the April 27, 1989,.
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. If you have any questions
on this mat~er, please let us know.
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution $89.-120.
May 15, 1989
Page 2
Subject: Calloway Land and Cattle Co.
RZ-89-017
CONCURRENCE:
Terr~ L. Virta
Development Director
DJM/RMS/1 a
Attachment
RE SERVE 3 (RMS- 8 )
cc: Asst. .Co. Admin. Kindred
.County Attorney
Regina Karner
Commission Secretary
Pres s/Publi c
TUESDAY
,AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAY 23. 1989
i:30.P.M.
Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Agent:
Karner & .Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1
~Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General)
for the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
(LoCation: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3
miles south of West Midway Road)
If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be
continued from time to time.
Please note that all proceedings-before the Board of-County
Commissioners ,are electronically recorded. If a person decides
to'a. ppeal any decision ~made by the Board of County Commissioners
with respect to-any matter considered at.such meeting or'hearing,
he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such
purpose, he may need to ensure that ~averbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request
of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a
hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be
granted an'opportunity to cross,examine any individual testifying
during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in
advance of the public hearing will also be considered.
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to
all adjacent property owners May 2, 1989. Legal notice was published
in the News Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in St.
Lucie County, on May 3, 1989.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
/s/ Judy Culpepper, Chairman
FILE NO. RZ-89-017
RESERVE P.U.D. SEC< .'ON i~'-2 COMM'ERCIAL'TRACT .~ - NORTH
REFERENCING THE REVISED INTERCHANOE BOUNDARY' LINE
PARCEL OF LAND LYINO WITHIN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST,-
ST. LUClE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS~
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF "THE RESERVE P.U.D.' AS. DESCRIBED tN
RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4~2 PAGES 667 THROUGH 672
PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89'45'33' EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 22,
A DISTANCE OF 984.93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, THENCE
NORTH 89'23'09' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF
95.77 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF A FLORIDA-POWER AND
COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 97 PAGE 504-. PUBLIC
RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ~OUTH 00~00'11· WE§T ALbNG SAID
WESTERLY LINE OF~THE FLORIDA POWERs-AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND
ALSO THE WEST LINE''. OF A FLORiDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIbHT-OF-WAY AS
RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 120, PAGE 199 THROUGH 201, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE
COUNTY-, ~FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF ~16;13 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION' WITH
THE PROPOSED WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-JAY OF T~R INTERSTATE- 95' INTERCHANGE PARCEL
AS D~.LIJ~LEA~_E~ BY A DESCRIPTION AND MAP OF SURVEY OF ~THE 1-95 INTERCHANGE
PRIMA VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID W. BETHAM, ~P,L.S., WITH FLORIDA
ICATION NO. 31~9'WITH. THE. ST. LUCIE WEST THOMAS J, WHITE DEVELOPMEN~
CORPORATION, DATED JANUARY 30, 1989, WITH THE FILE NO. 9S-1 THROUGH
CONSISTING OF THREE PAGES, WITH LAS~ REVISIONS ON 2-9-89;'THENCE',SOUTHWESTERLY
ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF'WAY LINE TH-E FOLLOWING. COURSES AND DI~STANCES~ .~
AFORESAID POINT OF .INTERSECTION BEING A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE NORTHWEST TO WMI'CH A RADIAL' LINE BEARS SOUTH ~d7_~4~4'14' EAST,-
SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.50 FEET, THENCE SOUTH'WES-WES~Y ALONG
THE ARC'OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF I75.42 FEET; THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 1_6~14~;~ THENCE SOUTH $9~O0'O0".-]~EBT, 4~2.08 FEET TO A
POINT OF CURVFTD-~k~ OF'A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH A RADIUS
OF 621.42 FEET THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AL'ONG THE ARC,OF SAID CURVE .A
DISTANCE OF 233.68 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21~32'43' TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE ~NTtNUE SOUTHWESTERLY .ALONG THE ARC'OF SAID CURVE'A DISTANCE !
OF 183.10 FEET.; THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16'$2'55'; THENCE SOUTH-
20~34'22'' WEST, 532.11 F~ET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS. OF 131.00 FEET; THENCE .'
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID~ CURVE A DISTANCE OF '149..35 FEET
THROUGH A CENTRA~ ANGLE OF 65'19'11'; THENCE SOUTH 85~$~'.33· WEST,
381.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00"06'27' EAST, 64.23 FEET; 'THENCE SOUTH
89'$3'33"_WEST, 300.00 FEET TO A'POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF THE PROPOSED 'RESERVE BOULEVARD' EXTENSION ;
THENCE DEPARTINO SAID PROPOSED INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY
RIOHT-OF~WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES;
.CONTINUE SOUTH 89~53'33, WEST, 402.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76'40'16'
WEST, 417.12 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF $15.59'FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF'SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 379.64 FEET, THROUOH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 42'11'20' TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE EAST, WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; _THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONO THE.ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 74.54 FEET,
THROUGH -~CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86'33'55' TO A POINT ON THE "EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PROPOSED EXTENSION OF "LEGENDS DRIVE' AN 80 |
FOOT INGRESS AND EGRESS RIGHT-(~F-WAY;
THENCE, DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF'. THE PROPOSED 'RESERVE
~OULEVARD.", NORTHEASTERLy ALONG SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY ~IGHT-OFiWAY LINE OF
LEGENDS DRIVE"--~-'-~E~ING COURSES AND DISTANCES-~ ~ ' ....
~THENCE NORTH 52'04'59' EAST, 128.01'.FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE dF A
CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,. NAVING A RADIUS OF '812o04 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 571.9I
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40~1'04" TO A .POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVETO'T~E NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF
611..85 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG ~HE ARC OF SAID CURVE A
DISTANCE OF 272.57 FEET,THROUGH~A' CENTRAL. ANGLE OF 25'~1"$0'~ THENCE
NORTH 66'.$4'39' EAST, 405.25 FEET TO A POt. NT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE .!
CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,' ~AVING A RADIUS OF 735,00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURV~ A DIS~ANC'E OF 249..49 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~9'26'$$~.; THENCE NORTH 86s21'33' ' EAST
~-474.55 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE dF A CURVE CONCAV~ TO THE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF' 906.59~.FEET; T~ENCE NORTHEASTERLY A~NG
THE ARC .OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCk OF 12~.96 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE iOF 07'53'49' ;'' ,
tHENCE D~PARTING SAID PROPOSED .EASTERLY RI~HT-OF~AY LINE OF 'LEGENDS DRIVE',
SOUTH 31'44'36' EAST.il6,67 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERS.ECTION.~ITH THE AFORE
SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE INTERCHANGE. PARCEL AND THE'POINT'OF BEGINNING
CONTAINING 30.82 ACRES MORE OR LESS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 2?, 1989
MINUTES
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: J. P.'Terpening, Patricia King, Joseph
Sciturro, Ken Pruitt, ~Dixon McCain, Robert. Carman, Jo Ann -Allen,
Douglas Skidmore, and Ralph Flowers (late - 7:30 P.M.)
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
OTHERS PRESENT: Krista Storey, Assistant County Attorney; Dennis
J.- Murphy, Land Development Manager; Chris Bove, Environmental
Planner III; and, Dolores Messer, Secretary.
TAPES: 1, 2, 3, and 4.
PRESS ATTENDANCE: Palm Beach Post
INVOCATION: The Invocation was given by Mr. Joseph Sciturro.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led
Chairman Terpening.
by
PUBLIC HEARING-CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO.-FILE NO. RZ-89-017:
Petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner and
Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural,
Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General) for property
located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of 1-95 and
Prima Vista Boulevard.
Mr. John Holcomb, President of Callaway Land & Cattle Co.,
presented the petition. He addressed the subject petition for a
change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac)
to CG (Commercial, General), which property is located in the
northwest quadrant of 1-95 and Prima Vista Boulevard.
Regarding Staff comments on the requested change to CG, Mr.
Murphy said Staff has reviewed the proposed changes and, at this
time, had no objection. It is consistent with the Development
Order and the Development of Regional Impact.
Hearing no public comment in favor of or in opposition to the
petition for change to CG, Vice Chairman King closed the - public
portion of the hearing.
After considering the testimony presented during the public
hearing; including Staff.comments and the Standards of Review as
set in Section 5.3.300, St. Lucie County .Zoning Ordinance~ .Mr~
Carman made a motion that the Planning and Zoning. Commission
recommend that the St. Lucie.County Board of County COmmissioners
grant approval to the petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co. for
a change in zoning from AR-'i (Agricultural, Residential ~ 1
du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General). Mr. Flowers seconded the'
motion, and upon roll call,.the Board voted unanimously in favor
of the motion, with the exception of Mr. Terpening who was out of
the room.
Vice Chairman King informed the petitioner! s agent ': that the
petition will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners
with a recommendation of approval.
26
Agenda Item: ~ 12
File Number: RZ-89-017
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Land Development Manager
April 24, 1989
Petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., by
Agent: Karner & Associates, for a Change in Zoning
from AR-1 (Agriculture, Residential - 1 du/ac) to
CG (Commercial, General).
LOCATI ON:
EXI STING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
PARCEL SI
PROPOSED USE:
SURROUNDING ZONI
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
FIRE/EMS PROTECTION:
WATER/SEWER SERVI CE:
Nortwest quadrant of the intersection .of
1-95 & Prima Vista Boulevard.
AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential -
du/ac).
CG (Commercial, General)
CG (Commercial, General)
30.82 Acres
Commercial development in association
with The Reserve, a Development of
Regional Impa~t.
AR-1 (CT and PUD pending)
This property .is directly northwest of
the 1-95 and~ Prima Vista interchange,
otherwise the parcel is surrounded by
undeveloped land.
Station ~3 (Prima Vista) is located 3
1/2 miles to the east.
On site sewer and water facilities to be
provided.
April 24, 1989
Page 2
Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co.
File No.: RZ-8-9-017
STANDARDS FOR REVIEW:
In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the
official Zoning Atlas, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
consider and make the following determinations:
Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with
any applicable portions of this Ordinance;
The proposed change in zoning is consistent with
the spirit and intent of the St. Lucie County
Ordinance, CG '(Commercial, General) zoning
district regulations.
Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with
all elements of the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan;
The proposed change in zoning is consistent with
the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy
Plan..
Whether and the exte.nt to which the proposed
amendment is inconsistent with existing and
proposed land uses;
The proposed change in zoning is compatible With
the proposed uses in the area.
o
Whether and the extent, to which the proposed
amendment would result in demands on public
facilities, and whether or to the extent to which
the proposed ~mendment would exceed the capacity
of such public facilities, including but not
limited to transportation facilities, sewage
facilities, water Supply, parks, drainage,
schools, and emergency medical facilities;
The proposed development is not expected to place
excessive demands on public facilities in this
area.
April 24, 1989
Page 3
Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Coo
File No. : RZ-89-017
Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in significant adverse
impacts upon the environment.
See Comments
Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in an orderly and logical
development pattern, specifically iden~ifying any
negative effects on such pattern;
The proposed amendment is compatible with the
development policies of the St. Lucie County
Growth Management Policy Plan.
Whether the proposed amendment would be in
conflict with the public interest, and is in
harmony with the purpose and interest of this
Ordinance;
The proposed amendment is consistent
with the public interest and the St. Lucie County
Zoning Ordinance.
' As this Board may recall, in_December of 1988,~ sitting as the
Local Planning Agency,. you ~.reviewed a series of Land Use Plan
· amendments in conjunction with the review of the Development of
Regional Impact application for The Reserve. One of the many Land
Use Amendments under consideration at the time involved ~.a 30
acre 'tract of land requested' for a Commercial General land Use
Uesignation. This requested 'designation was approved by a
unanimous vote of t.hose present in December. Before you now is
the-petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., 'for a change in
zoning from AR-1 to CG, consistent with the land use designation
on this property.
County staff has reviewed this petition and found it
consistent with the standards of review in the St. Lucie County
Zoning Ordinance' and St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy
Plan, and in broad terms with the approved Development Order for
The Reserve, as cited in Resolution 989-73.
April 24, 1989
Page 4
Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co.
File No.: RZ-89-017
ST. LUCIE COUNTY WOULD REMIND THE PETITIONER, AND ANY
SUBSEQUENT SUCCESSOR THERETO, THAT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
ST.' LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION NO. 89-
73, WHICH EFFECT THIS PROPERTY MUST BE COMPLIED WI TH. WE WOULD
FURTHER ADVISE THE PETITIONER THAT THE ABOVE CITED RESOLUTION
WILL BE RECOMMENDED FOR INCLUSION AS AN ATTACHMENT ONTO ANY
APPROVAL RESOLUTION ACTED UPON BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMI SSI ONERS.
In a slightly different forwarding action than you are
accustomed to, staff has attached a copy of draft Resolution 89-
120, which would grant approval to this requested change in
zoning. Staff recommends that you forward draft Resolution 89-120
to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of
approval.
If you have any questions on this matter, please let us know°
DJM/RMS
RESV-CGI(RMS-RZ6)
cc: County Attorney
Karner and Associates
RESERVE P.U.D. SEC~fON i~~-i COMMERCIAL TRACT ~ - NORTH
REFERENClNO THE REVISED INTERCHANGE BOUNDARY' LINE
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS~
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF "THE RESERVE P.U.D.. AS DESCRIBED IN
RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4~2 PAGES 667 THROUOH 672
PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89~45'33, EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 22,
A DISTANCE OF 984.93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, THENCE
NORTH 89'23'09. EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF
95.77 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF A FLORIDA-POWER AND
~ COMPANY RIOHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 97 PAGE 504.. PUBLIC
RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00~00,11· WE§T A~NG SAIU
WESTERLY LINE OF-~..THE FLORIDA POWER. AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND
ALSO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY AS
RECORDED IN O.R... BOOK 120, PAGE 199 THROUGH 201, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF ~2t~_16;13 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH
THE PROPOSED WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-Way ~F THE INTERSTATE -.-95' INTERCHANGE PARCEL
D~..~.Itt~A~_~ BY A DESCRIPTION AND MAp-OF SURVEY OF THE 1-95 INTERCHANGE -
PR.INA VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY'DAVID W. BETHAM, P.L.S., WITH FLORIDA
CERTIFICATION NO. ~199 WITH THE ST. LUCIE'WEST THOMAS J. WHITE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION,. DA.TED JANUARY SO, 1989, WITH THE FILE NO. 9S-1 THROUGH
ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE 'FOLLOWING COURSES AND
AFORESAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE NORTHWEST TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH ~Z7~_44'14" EAST,.
SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 6.00.50 FEET-, THENCE SOUTH~ES~y ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CHRVE A DISTANCE OF '175.42 FEET; THROUOH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF ~14,, THENCE SOUTH 59'~6~-'-0-0~.~EBT, 462.08 FEET TO A
POINT OF ~URV~E7 OF 'A ~UR'VE CON~AV~ TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH A
OF 621.42 FEET THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC.OF SAXD CURVE-A
DISTANCE OF 233.68 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21~S'2'43" TO
THE POINT OF
THENCE ~NTINUE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC-OF SAID CURVE'A -DISTANCE
OF 183.10. FEET; THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16%$2,$$-; THENCE SOUTH-
20~34'22"' WEST, $32.11 FkET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 131.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTER.LY ALONG THE' ARC OF SAID. CUR~E A DISTANCE OF '149.35 FEET
THROUGH A CENTRA~ ANOLE OF 65~19'11.; THENCE SOUTH 85%$B'3S. WEST,
381.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'06'27" EAST, 64.23 FEET; 'THENCE SOUTH
89'$3'33".WEST, 300.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF THE PROPOSED "RESERVE BOULEVARD" EXTENSION ;
DEPARTINO SAID PROPOSED INTERCHANOE PARCEL AND ALONO THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES;
NORTHERLY
ANOLE OF 86'33'55" TO A POINT ON
C'ONTINUE SOUTH 89'53'33' WEST, 402.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76~40'16·
WEST, 417.12 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 51$o$9'FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF'SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 379.64 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 42'11'20' TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE EAST, WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; .THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONO THE .ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 7.4 54 FEET,
THROUON ~--~CENTRAL '
THE -EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PROPOSED EXTENSION.OF 'LEGENDS DRIVE' AN 80
FOOT INGRESS AND EGRESS RIGHT-dF-WAY;
THENCE, DEPARTING .SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE PROPOSED 'RESERV!
:D', NO_~RT~EASTERL3 ALONG SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
'LEGENDS DRIVE~ ~~ING COURSES AND DISTANCES.~
~{LTHENCE NORTH $2'04'59' EAST, 128,01' FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A
CUR'VE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,. HAVING A RADIUS 0F~"812.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 571.91
FEET, THROUGH- A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4~%~1-'04. TO A POINT 'OF REVERSE
CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE'TO'THE. NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF
611.85 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG ~HE ARC OF SAID CURVE A
DISTANCE OF 272.57 FEET, THROUGH% A CENTRAL ANGLE-OF 25-'31"$0'; THENCE
NORTH 66'$4'3'9' EAST; 405.25 'FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,'. ~AVING A RADIUS OF ~35'.00 FEET;. THENCE
NORTHEASTER.LY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID'CURV~ A DISTANC~E~OF 249..49 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 0F.~9'26,$5~.1 THENCE NORT~.86~2~'3~, EAST
474.55 FEET' TO A POINT OF CURVATURE dF A CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 906,$9..FEET; T~ENCE NORTHEASTERLY A~ONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCk OF 124.96 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 67'53'49' ;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED.EASTERLY RIGHT-OF?~AY LINE OF 'LEGENDS, DRIVE',
SOUTH 31'44'36" EAST.il6.67 FEET TO THE P6INT OF INTERSECTION W'ITH THE AFORE
SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND THE POINT'OF BEGINNING
CONTAINING 30.82 ACRES MORE OR LESS
CURRENT ZONING
PUD - RED
AR-1 - BLUE
RS-2 - GREEN
2?-36-39
/
/
/
AB-I
PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO.. INC,
BY AGENT: REGtNA KARNER, P.L.S.
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION ~.
FROM AR-1 TO CG
FUTURE LAND USE
SU BLUE
RL - RED
CG - GREEN
CT - ORANGE
PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CAI-il_E CO., INC.
BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER, P.L.S.
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION
FROM AR-1 TO CG
27-36-39
RESOLUTION NO. 89-120
FILE NO.: RZ-89-017
A RESOLUTION CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St.
County, Florida, has made the following determinations:
Lucie
1. Callaway Land Cattle Company presented a petition for a
change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural Residential 1 du/ac) to
CG (Commercial 'General) for .the property described below.
2. The St. Lucie County Planning and-~Zoning Commission;
held a public'/hearing on.the~.petition, after publishing notice at
least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing and notifying by
mail owners of property within five hundred feet (500') of the
subject property, and has recommended that the Board approve the
hereinafter described request for change in zoning classification
from AR-1 (Agricultura~ 'Residential 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial
General) for the property described below.
3. On May 23rd, 1989, this-Board held a public hearing on
the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the
Fort Pierce News Tribune on May 3., 1989, and notifying by mail
all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property.
4. The proposed zoning change is consistent with the St.
Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan and has satisfied the
standards of review set out in Section 5.3.300 of the St. Lucie
County Zoning Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida:
A. The Zoning Classification for that property described as
fol 1 ows:
SEE ATTACHED
owned by Callaway Land & Cattle Company, be and the same. is
hereby, changed from AR-! (Agricultural ~Residential 1 du/ac) ~to
CG (Commercial General).
Bo The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is
hereby authorized and directed to cause the changes to be .made on
the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make
notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution°
C. Attached as reference and hereby incorporated into the
development reviews required for any activit~y on this property is
BCC Resolution 89-73, a Development Order for The Reserve, a
Development of Regional Impact.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as
fol 1 ows:
Chairman Judy Culpepper
Vice-Chairman Havert L. Fenn
Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner
Commissioner Jack Krieger
Commissioner Jim Minix
XX
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 23rd day of May, 1989.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
CLERK
BY:
CHAt RMAN
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
89-120
REZONE(b)
TUESDAY
.AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAY 23, 1989
1:30 P.M.
Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Agent:
Karner & Associates, for a change in zoninG from AR-1
(AGricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General)
for the followinG described property:
(SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
(Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3
miles south of West Midway Road)
If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be
continued from time to time.
Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County
Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides
to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners
with respect to any matter considered at such meetinG or hearinG,
he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such
purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request
of any party to the proceedinG, individuals testifyinG during a
hearinG will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedinG will be
Granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
durinG a hearinG upon request. Written comments received in
advance of the public hearinG will also be considered.
Prior to this public hearinG, notice of the same was sent to
all adjacent property owners May 2, 1989. LeGal notice was published
in the News Tribune, a newspaper of General circulation in St.
Lucie County, on May 3, 1989.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
/s/ Judy Culpepper, Chairman
FILE NO. RZ-89-017
RESERVE P.U.D. SECTION i~'-i COMMERCIAL TRACT A NORTH
REFERENCING THE REVISED INTERCHANGE BOUNDARY3 LINE
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANOE 39 EAST,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS!
~E AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF 'THE RESERVE P.U.D.' AS DESCRIBED IN
RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4%2 PAGES 667 THROUGH 672
PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89~45'39' EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 22,
A DISTANCE OF 984.99 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, THENCE
NORTH 89'25'09" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2S, A DISTANCE OF
FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF A FLORIDA.POWER AND
COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 97 PAGE 504.. PUBLIC
RECORDS OF ST. LUClE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00'00'11" WE§T ALONG SAID'
WESTERLY LINE OF.~THE FLORIDA POWER' AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND
ALSO THE WEST LiNE" OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY '
RECORDED IN O.R. B~O' RIGHT-OF-WAY AS
. , 0 K 120, PAGE 199 THROUGH 201, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE
COUNIY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE 0F__8_,_~_%6,18 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH
~HE PROPOSED WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-W~ INTERSTATE - 95' INTERCHANGE PA
AS ~.IB. EA~.E.~ BY A DESCRIPTION AND RCE[
MAP OF SURVEY OF THE 1-95 INTERCHANGE -
PRIMA VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID W. BETNAM, P.L.S., WITH FLORIDA
CERTIFICATION NO. ~199 WITH THE ST. LUCIE WEST THOMAS j. WHITE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, DATED JANUARY SO, ~989, WITH THE FILE NO.
95-1 THROUGH..'95-3
CONSISTING OF THREE PAGES, WITH LAST REVISIONS ON 2-9-89~ THENCE~OUTHWESTERLy
ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT,OF.WAy LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES~
AFORESAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING-A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE- TO -
THE NORTHWEST TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH ~J~_'4~4'I4, EAST,
SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.50 FEET, THENCE SOUTH-WES~y ALQNG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF $75.42 FEETs THROUGH A CENTRAL
.ANGLE OF ~~14'; THENCE SOUTH S9'CO-~-'-O~'-W~BT, 462.08 FEET TO A
POINT OF CURVFTURk~OF'A CURVE CONCAVE TO TH~ SOUTHEAST WITH A RADIUS
,DF 621.4'2 FEET THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC.OF SAID CURVE A
DISTANCE OF 2~S.6S FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21'~2'4S' TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE d~NTINUE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE
OF iSa.lO FEET; THROUGH A' CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~6'$2'55,; THENCE SOUTH
20'S4'22" WEST, $S2.~! FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE 'OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF lSl.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID cURVE A DISTANCE OF '149.S5 FEET
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65~19,11,; THENCE SOUTH 8$~$S,SS, WEST,
381.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'06'27' EAST, 64.2S FEET; 'THENCE SOUTH
89~$S'SS".WEST, SO0.O0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF THE PROPOSED 'RESERVE BOULEVARD' EXTENSION ;
DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES;
CONTINUE SOUTH 89~5S'~3" WEST, 402.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76'40'16'
.WEST, 417.12 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF $1$,$9'FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF'SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF S79,64 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 42'11'20, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE EAST~ WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; .THENCE
N(~ .ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 74.54 FEET,
~GH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86'SS'$~., TO A POINT ON THE "EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PROPOSED EXTENSION OF "LEGENDS DRIVE" AN 8O
tFOOT INGRESS AND EGRESS RIGHT-OF-WAY;
ITHENCE, DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE PROPOSED "RESERVE
IBOULEVARD ', NO_NO_~RTRT~EASTERL~ ALONG SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
'LEGENDS DRIVE' ~~-E6'~ING COURSES AND DISTANCES.
~i'THENCE NORTH 52~04'$9" EAST, 118.01 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A
~ CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,. HAVING A RADIUS OF '8~2,04 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE. OF 571.91
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40:~1'04" TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO'THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF
61t.85 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A
DISTANCE OF 272.57 FEET, THROUGH~A CENTRAL AN~LE OF 25'~1'$0'; THENCE
NORTH 66'54'39' EAST, 405.25 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,'. HAVING A RADIUS OF ?55.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 149..49 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19'26'~5,.; THENCE NORTH 86~21'33. EAST
474.55 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE ~.F A CURVE CONCAVE. TO THE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 906.59..FEET; T~ENC~ NORTHEASTERLY A~ONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 124.95 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 67'53'49" ;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY RIGHT-OFTWAy LINE OF "LEGENDS DRIVE",
SOUTH 31'44'36' EAST.il6.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION W'ITH THE AFORE
SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND THE POINT'OF BEGINNING
CONTAINING 30.82 ACRES MORE OR LESS
BOARD OF COUNTY DCVCLOPMCNT
. . COMMISSIONCRS D IRCCTOR
<~% Ma TERRY L. ~R~
y 2, 1989
In compliance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Zoning
Ordinance you are hereby advised that Callaway Land & Cattle Co.,
Inc., by Agent: Karner & Associates, has petitioned the Board of
County Commissioners for a change in zoning from AR-1
(Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General)
for the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
(Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3
miles south of West Midway Road)
The Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on
this petition at 1:30 P.M. on Tuesday, May 23, 1989 in St. Lucie
County Commission Chambers, third floor of County Administration
Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. Ail
interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at
that time. Written comments received in advance of the public
hearing will also be considered. The petitioner wishes to allow
development of a general commercial area directly northwesterly
of the 1-95 interchange that, ~t the present, is under
construction.
Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, are electronically
recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the
Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter con-
sidered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the
proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to
be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding,
individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any
party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-
examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request.
If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued
from time to time.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described
parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. If you
should have any questions, additional information may be obtained
by calling Area Code 407, 468-1553.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST.~LUCIE ~COUNTY, FLORIDA
Jud~ Cu~lpep~er, Chairman FILE NO. RZ-89-017
HAVERT h. FENN, District No I · JUDY CULPEPPER District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER. District No. 4 · JIM MINIX District No. 5
County Administrator -- WELDON BE LEWIS
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Director: (407) 468-1590 · Building: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407) 468-1576
Zoning: (407) 468-t553 · Code Enforcement: (407) 468-1571
RESERVE P.U.D. SECTION i~'" COMMERCIAL TRACT A - NORTH
REFERENCING THE REVISED INTERCHANGE BOUNDARY3 LINE
PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS~
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF "THE RESERVE P.U.D.' AS DESCRIBED IN
RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4~2 PAGES 667 THROUGH 672
PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89~45'39. EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 22,
A DISTANCE OF 984.93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, THENCE
NORTH 89'29'09' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF
9
5~.77 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF A FLORIDA.POWER AND
~ COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O,R. BOOK 97 PAGE 504. PUBLIC
RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00~00'11· WE§T ALONG SAID'
WESTERLY LINE OF ~.THE FLORIDA POWER-AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND
ALSO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY AS
RECORDED IN O.R. BO0~ 120, PAGE 199 THROUGH 201, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE
cOUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE 0F2:_._~.13 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH
THE PROPOSED WESTERLY R'IGHT-OF-WA~ INTERSTATE - 95 INTERCHANGE PARCEL
AS ~...~oEA.~.E_~ BY A DESCRIPTION AND MAP OF SURVEY OF THE 1-95 INTERCHANGE
PRIMA VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID W. BETHAM, P.L,S,, WITH FLORIDA
CERTIFICATION NO. 9199 WITH THE ST. LUCIE WEST THOMAS J. WHITE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, DATED JANUARY 90, 1989, WITH THE FILE NO. 95-1 THROUGH 95-3
G OF THREE PAGES, WITH LAST REVISIONS ON 2-9-89; THENCE~OUTHWESTERLY
ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES~ .~
AFORESAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE NORTHWEST TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH ~J~/_'34,14. EAST,
SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.S0 FEET, THENCE SOUTH-~kS-~-~y ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 175.42 FEET; THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 1_(~2_~4'14'; THENCE SO. UTH 59~,-O~'iWRBT, 462.08 FEET TO A
POINT OF CURV-'~-~-T~-~ OF'A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH A RADIUS
OF 621.42 FEET THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC.OF SAID CUR~E A
DISTANCE OF 239.68 FEET, THROUOH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21~2'43' TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE ~NTINUE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE
OF lSd.lO FEET; THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16'52'55'; THENCE SOUTH
20'34'22' WEST, ~32.11 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 191.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF '149.35 FEET
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65~19'11.; THENCE SOUTH 85~$3'~, WEST,
381.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'06'27" EAST, 64.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
99'53'33' WEST, 300.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF THE PROPOSED 'RESERVE BOULEVARD' EXTENSION ;
TH~NC]~ DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY
RIGHT'-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES;
CONTINUE SOUTH S9~53'33" WEST, 402.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76~40'16'
WEST, 417.12 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF $1$.~9'FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF'SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 379.64 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 42'1~'20" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE EAST, WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; .THENCE
NORTHEASTER~L~ ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 74.54 FEET,
THROUGH ~-~-~CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86'99'55' TO A POINT ON THE ~'EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PROPOSED EXTENSION OF #LEGENDS DRIVE' AN 80 %
FOOT INGRESS AND EGRESS RIGHT-OF-WAY;
THENCE, DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE PROPOSED 'RESERVE
BOULEVARD,, NO__~RT~STERL~ ALONG SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
'LEGENDS DRIVE" ~~ING COURSES AND DISTANCES~
~{L-THENCE ' ~'
NORTH 52'04'59' EAST, 128.01 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A
CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,. HAVXN~ A RADIUS OF '811.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 571,91
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40:~1'04" TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO'THE. NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF
6!11.85 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A
DiISTANCE OF 272.57 FEET, THROU~H~ A CENTRAL ANSLE OF 25'~1'$0'; THENCE
NORTH 66'54'39' EAST, 405.25 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,' HAVING A RADIUS OF ?$$.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 149..49 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 0F.!9'26'55".; THENCE NORT~ 86~21'33' EAST
- 474.55 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE dF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST NAVING A RADIUS OF 906.~9..FEET; T~ENCE NORTHEASTERLY A~ONG
THE ARC :OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 124,96 FEET THROUOH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF ~7'53'49" ; ~
THENCE DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY RIGHT-OFTWAy LINE OF 'LEGENDS 'DRIVE',
SOUTH 31'44'36' EAST .i16.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION W'ITH THE AFORE
SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND THE POINT'OF BEGINNING
CONTAINING 30.82 ACRES MORE OR LESS
N O T I C E
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commis-
sioners in and for St. Lucie County, Florida, will at 1:30 P.M.
on Tuesday, May 23, 1989, in St. Lucie County Commission
Chambers, third floor of County Administration Building Annex,
2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida hold a public hearing
on:
Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Agent:
Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1
(Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General)
for the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
(Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3
miles south of West Midway Road)
All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be
heard at this time. Written comments received in advance of the
public hearing will also be considered.
Please note that all proceedings before %he Board of County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, are electronically
recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the
Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter con-
sidered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the
proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record
±ncludes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to
be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding,
individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any
party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-
examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request.
If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be
continued from time to time.
Dated this 1st day of May, 1989.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
/s/' Judy Culpepper, Chairman
PI~LISH: MAY 3, 1989
RESERVE P.U.D, SECTION ii'" COMMERCIAL TRACT A - NORTH
REFERENCIN~ THE REVISED INTERCHANGE BOUNDARY~ LINE
A PARCEL OF LAND ~L¥INO WITHIN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 96 SOUTH, RANGE 59 EAST
ST. LUClE COUNTY, FLORIDA,~.MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS~
COMMENCE AT THE ~THEASTERLY;CORNER OF "THE RESERVE P.U.D." AS DESCRIBED
RESOLUTION NO. '8~-t2.9 .AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOR 4%2 PAGES 667 THROUGH 67
PUBLIC RECORDS OF ~?. LUCiE~COUN.TY,- FLORIDA, LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF
SECTION 22; THENC~ ~OUTH 89~5'~, EAST~ ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 22
A DISTANCE OF 984.9~ FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, THENC
NORTH 89~29'09· ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2~, A DISTANCE 0
95.77 FEET ~0 THE ~NTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF A FLORIDA.POWER AN
COMPANY RI~T~OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 97 PAGE 504. PUBLI
RECORDS OF ST~ LU~E COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00~00'1~· WE~T AL~NG
WESTERLY LINE OF THE'FLORIDA POWER' AND LIOHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AN
ALSO THE WEST OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY A
RECORDED INi O.R. B~O~ ~20~ PAGE 199 THROUGH 201, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUC~
COUNTY, FLORIDA, DIsTA~E~OF..8,~_!6,~$ FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WIT}
THE PROPOSED WES RIGHT'OF-WAY ~F Ti%~E INTERSTATE - 95' INTERCHANGE PARCE
AS ~L.I/J~A~ BY a DESCRIPTION AND MAP OF SURVEY OF THE 2-95 INTERCHANGE
PRIMA VISTA BOULE:~D, PREPARED BY DAVID W~ BETHAM, P.L.S., WITH FLORID
CERTIFICATION NO. $199 WITH THE ST. LUCIE WEST THOMAS J. WHITE DEVELOPMEN'
CORPORATION, DATE~D JANUARY SO, 1989, WITH THE FILE NO. 9S-1 THROUGH 95-
CONSISTINO OF TH.~ ~A~ES. WITH LAST REViSIOnS ON ~-~-~, THENCE.~~TERL
ALONG SAID WESTER~ ~I~H~-OF-WAY LINE TH-E FOLLOWING COURSES AND DIS~ANCE~,,
AFOR~SAi~ ~e~? OF INTERSECTION BEIN~ A POINT ON ^ CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE ~OR~HWE~?- TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE ~EARS SOUTH ~__~'~. EAST,
SAID CURVE H~ A RADIUS OF 600.50 FEET, THENCE SOUT~W-E-~-T-k"]tLY ALONG
THE ARC OF S~ CURVE A DISTANCE OF 175.42 FEET; THROUOH A CENTRAL
.ANGLE OF THENCE SOUTH 59~-6'~O~".~EBT, 462.0S FEET TO A
POINT OF F A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH A RADIUS
'OF 62~.42 THENCE~SOUTHWESTERLY ALONO THE ARC.OF SAID CURVE A
DISTANCE OF ,68 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21~B2'43" TO
THE POINT OF
THENCE d~NT SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE
OF lSd.lO ~THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16'$2'55"; THENCE SOUTH
20~4'22' ,$$2.11 F~ET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAV~ TO NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1~1.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERL~ THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF '149.~5 FEET
THROUGH A AN~LE OF 65~19'11~; THENCE SOUTH 85~$~'$S, WEST,
381.82 FEET; TWENCE SOUTH 00'06'27" EAST, 64.2S FEET; THENCE SOUTH
89~$~'$~".WEST~, ~00.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF THE PROPO~E~ ~REBERVE BOULEVARD" EXTENSION ;
~NCE DEPARTIN~ ~i~AID PROPOSED INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND ALONG THE NORTHERL~
RIGHT~-OF-WAY LINE TWE FOLLOWIN~ COURSES AND DISTANCES;
CONTINUE SOUTH $9~55.,~S. WEST,.. 402.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76'4b'16'
WEST, 417.12 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTREAST, HAV~ A RADIUS OF 515.59'FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG
T}{E ARC OF'SAID' CURVE A DISTANCE OF S79.64 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 42~1'20~ TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO TWE EAST~ WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHE~STE~L~ ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF ?4.54 FEET,
~-~ROUG~ ~'---~CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86'33'$$" TO A POINT ~ON THE '-EASTERLY'
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 'OF' T'HE~PROPOSED EXTENSION OF "LEGENDS DRIVE" AN 80
FOOT INGRESS AN~ EGRESS RIGHT-dF-WAY; '
ITNENCE, DEPARTING S~t~ NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE PROPOSED "RESERVE
IBOULEVARD., N__O_O_R_R~ .ALON~ SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
'LEGENDS DRIVE; 'T~~-~ING.~COURSES~AND DISTANCESI · '
~-THENCE '' '
NORTH 52'04:'$9. EAST, 128,01 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A
~ CURVE CONCAVE TO'THE SOUTHEAST,. HAVING A RADIUS OF '812,04 FEET~
"' ' THENCE NoRTHEASTErLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 571,91
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40:~I'04· TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO'THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF
611.85 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A
DISTANCE OF 272.57 FEET, THROUGH~. A CENTRAL AN~LE OF 25'$1'$0'; THENCE
NORTH 66'$4'39' EAST, 405,25 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,' HAVING A RADIUS OF 755,00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ASONG THE ARC OF SAiD CURVE A DISTANCE OF 249.49 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~9'26'55".; THENCE NORTH 86'2~'~3" EAST
- 474.55 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE dF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 906.~9.FEET; T~ENCE NORTHEASTERLY A~ONG
THE ARC .OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 124,96 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 07~53,49· ;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY RIGHT-OFrWAy LINE OF "LEGEND'S DRIVE',
souTH 31'44'36" EAST.il6.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION W'ITH THE AFORE
SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND THE POINT'OF BEGINNING
CONTAINING 30~82 ACRES MORE OR LESS
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Assistant County Administrator
FROM:
Development Director
DATE:
April 26, 1989
SUBJECT: Request for Hearing Date
Please place on the agenda for Tuesday, May 2, 1989, a
for permission to advertise the following petitions for
on the date set forth:
request
hearing
BCC HEARING DATE: MAY 23. 1989
Petition of Cleo Stern (Trustee), for a change in zoning from
AG (Agricultural) to CG (Commercial, General) and IL
(Industrial, Light).
Petition of Richard Long, by Agent: Mark Benton, for a
Conditional Use Permit to operate a package store for the
retail sale of liquor in a CG (Commercial, General) Zoning
District.
Petition of Agri-Bin, Inc., by Agent: Tom McFrederick, for a
Conditional Use Permit to authorize t~ manufacture of wood
produCts (wood boxes) in an IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning
District.
Petition of American Financial Life Insurance Co., by Agent:
Genevieve L. Jackson, for a change in zoning from 'AR-1
(Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to RS-2 (Residential,
Single Family - 2 du/ac).
Petition of Sid and Monica Nathanson for a change in zoning
from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to RS-2
(Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac).
Petition of United Land Ventures, Inc. for a change in zoning
from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to RS-2
(Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac).
Petition of Elizabeth J. Walker, by Agent: James K. Jones,
for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential -
1 du/ac) to RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac).
Petition of STS Properties, by Agent: Robert V. Schwerer,
Esquire, to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucia
County Growth Management Policy Plan from RL (Low Density
Residential Development) to CG (General Commercial
Development).
Petition of STS Properties, by Agent: Robert V. Schwerer,
Esquire, for a change in zoning from RM-5 (Residential,
Multiple Family - 5 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General).
10. Petition of~Callaway Land & Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner &
Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural,
Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General).
11. Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner &
Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural,
Residential - t du/ac) to CT (Commercial, Tourist).
12. Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner &
Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural,
Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to
PUD (Planned Unit Development) - The Reserve, Section II.
13. Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner &
Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural,
Residential - 1 du/ac) and RS-2 (Residential, Single 'Family -
2 du/ac) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) - The Reserve,
Section III.
14.
Petition of Mick Satur (Ft. Pierce Business Park)
change in zoning from IH (Industrial, Heavy)
(Planned Non-Residential Development).
for a
to PNRD
cc: County Administrator
Agenda Item:
File Number:
% 12
RZ-89-017
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Land Development Manager
April 24, 1989
Petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., by
Agent: Karner & Associates, for a Change in Zoning
from AR-1 (Agriculture, Residential - 1 du/ac) to
CG (Commercial, General).
LOCATION:
EXI STING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
FI RE/EMS PROTECTION:
WATER/SEWER SERVICE:
Nortwest quadrant of the intersection of
1-95 & Prima Vista Boulevard.
AR-1 (Agricultural,
du/ac).
Residential
CG (Commercial, General)
CG (Commercial, General )
30.82 Acres
Commercial development in association
with The Reserve, a Development of
Regional Impact.
AR-1 (CT and PUD pending)
This property is directly northwest of
the 1-95 and Prima Vista interchange,
otherwise the parcel is surrounded by
undeveloped land.
Station ~3 (Prima Vista) is located 3
1./2 miles to the east.
On site sewer and water facilities to be
provided.
April 24, 1989
Page 2
Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co.
File No.: RZ-89-017
STANDARDS FOR REVIEW:
In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the
official Zoning Atlas, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
consider and make the following determinations:
Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with
any applicable portions of this Ordinance;
The proposed change in zoning is con~istent with
the spirit and intent of the St. Lucie County
Ordinance, CG '(Commercial, General ) zoning
district regulations.
Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with
all elements of the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan;
The proposed change in zoning is consistent with
the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy
Plan.
Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment is inconsistent with existing and
proposed land uses;
The proposed change in zoning is compatible with
the proposed uses in the area.
Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in demands on public
facilities, and whether or to the extent to which
the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity
of such public facilities, including but not
limited to transportation facilities, sewage
facilities, water supply, parks, drainage,
schools, and emergency medical facilities;
The proposed development is not expected to place
excessive demands on public facilities in this
area.
.April 24, 1989
Page 3
Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co.
File No.: RZ-89-017
Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in significant adverse
impacts upon the environment.
See Comments
Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in an orderly and logical
development pattern, specifically identifying any
negative effects on such pattern;
The proposed amendment is compatible .with the
development policies of the St. Lucie County
Growth Management Policy Plan.
Whether the proposed amendment would be in
conflict with the public interest, and is in
harmony with the purpose and interest of this
Ordinance;
The proposed amendment is consistent
with the public interest and the St. Lucie County
Zoning Ordinance.
As this Board may recall, in December of 1.988,. sitting as the
Local Planning Agency,. you reviewed a series of Land Use Plan
amendments in conjunction with the review of the Development of
Regional Impact application for The Reserve. One of the many Land
Use Amendments under consideration at the time involved a 30
acre tract of land requested for a Commercial General land Use
D'esign~ation. This requested designation was approved by a
unanimous vote of those present in December. Before you now is
the petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., for a change in
zoning from AR-1 to CG, consistent with the land use designation
on this property.
County staff has reviewed this petition and found it
consistent with the standards of review in the St. Lucie County
Zoning Ordinance and St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy
Plan, and in broad terms with the approved Development Order for
The Reserve, as cited in Resolution ~89-73.
April 24, 1989
Page 4
Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co.
File No.: RZ-89-017
ST. LUCIE COUNTY WOULD REMIND THE PETITIONER, AND ANY
SUBSEQUENT SUCCESSOR THERETO, THAT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
ST.' LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION NO. 89-
73, WHICH EFFECT THIS PROPERTY MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. WE WOULD
FURTHER ADVISE THE PETITIONER THAT THE ABOVE CITED RESOLUTION
WILL BE RECOMMENDED FOR INCLUSION AS AN ATTACHMENT ONTO ANY
APPROVAL RE SOLUTI ON ACTED UPON BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMI SSI ONERS.
In a slightly different forwarding action than you are
accustomed to, staff has attached a copy of draft Resolution 89-
120, which would grant approval to this requested change in
zoning. Staff recommends that you forward draft Resolution 89-120
to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of
approval.
If you have any questions on this matter, please let us know.
DJM/RMS
RESV-CGI(RMS-RZ6)
cc: County Attorney
Karner and Associates
RESOLUTION NO4 89-120
FILE NO.: RZ-89-017
A RESOLUTION CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St.
County, Florida, has made the following determinations:
Lucie
1. Callaway Land Cattle Company presented a petition for a
change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural Residential 1 du/ac) to
CG (Commercial General) for the property described below.
2. The St. LuCie County Planning and Zoning Commission,
held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at
least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing and notifying by
mail owners of property within five hundred feet (500') of the
subject property, and has recommended that the Board approve/deny
the hereinafter described request for change in zoning
classification from AR-1 (Agricultural Residential 1 du/ac) to CG
(Commercial General) for the property described below.
3. On , 19 , this Board held a
public heating'on the petition, after publishing~a notice of such
hearing in the Fort Pierce News Tribune on
and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet o~
the subject property.
4. The proposed zoning change is consistent with the St.
Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan and has satisfied the
standards of review set out in Section 5.3.300 of the St. Lucie
County Zoning Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida:
A. The Zoning Classification for that property described as
follows:
SEE ATTACHED
owned by , be and the same is
hereby, changed from AR-I (Agricultural Residential 1 du/ac) to
CG (Commercial General).
B. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is
hereby authorized and directed to cause the changes to be made on
the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make
notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution.
C. Attached as reference and hereby incorporated into the
development reviews required for any activity on this property is
BCC Resolution 89-73, a Development Order for The Reserve, a
Development of Regional Impact.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as
follows:
Chairman Judy Culpepper
Vice-Chairman Havert L. Fenn
Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner
Commissioner Jack Krieger
Commissioner Jim Minix
PASSED
AND DULY ADOPTED this · 1989.
day
of
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
CLERK
BY:
CHAIRMAN
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
ORD89-120
REZONE(B)
COUNTY ATTORNEY
THURSDAY
APRIL 27. 1989
AGENDA - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
7:00 P.M.
Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Agent:
Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1
(Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General)
for the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
(Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3
miles south of West Midway Road)
Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and
Zoning .Commission are electronically recorded. If a person de-
cides~to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning
Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting
or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that,
for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim'record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to based. Upon the request of
any 'party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a
hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be
granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in
advance of the public hearing will also be considered.
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to
all adjacent property owners April 4, 1989. Legal notice was published
in the News Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in St.
Lucie County, on April 5, 1989.
FILE NO. RZ-89-017
RESERVE P.U.D. SECTION ii' COMMERCIAL TRACT ~A - NORTH
REFERENCING THE REVISED INTERCHANGE BOUNDARY: LINE
~ PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST,'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS~
COHHENCE AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF 'THE RESERVE P.U.D." AS DESCRIBED IN
RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 442 PAGES 667 THROUGH 672
PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89"45'33, EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 22,
A DISTANCE OF 984.'93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, THENCE
NORTH 89~23'09. EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2:3, A DISTANCE OF
95.77' FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF A FLORIDA.POWER AND
COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O,R. BOOK 97 PAGE 504._ PUBLIC
)RDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00"00'11, WE~T A~NG SAID'
WESTERLY LINE OF--~..THE FLORIDA POWER-AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND
ALSO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RfGHT-OF-WAY AS
RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 120, PAGE 199 THROUGH 201, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE 0F._8_~_16;13 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH
THE PROPOSED WESTERLY RIgHT-OF-WAy ~F: THE INTERSTATE - 95' INTERCHANGE PARCEL
AS D~E.~.~_E~ BY A DESCRIPTION. AND MAP OF SURVEY OF THE X-95 INTERCHANGE -
PRIMA VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID W. BETHAM, P.L.S., WITH FLORIDA
TIFICATI.O*N NO. 3199 WITH THE ST. LUCIE WEST THOMAS J. WHITE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, DATED JANUARY 30, 1989, WITH THE FILE NO, 95-1 THROUGH .95.~3
CONSISTING OF THREE PAGES, WITH LAST REVISIONS ON 2-9-89; THENCE SOUTHWE.STERL__Y
ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND ~ISTANCES~ ~ ~
AFORESAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE NORTHWEST TO WHICH A RADXAL LINE BEARS SOUTH ~J_/44'14" EAST,
SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 600,50 FEET, THENCE SOUT~ES~-f~y ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF ~75.42 FEET; THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF ~1_~_4~j THENCE SOUTH S9~O'6-~-O-O~EBT, 462.08 FEET TO A
POINT OF ~URVKTI~R-~. OF~A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH A RADIUS
OF 621.42 FEET THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC.OF SAID CURVE .A
DISTANCE OF 233.68 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21~32'43. TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; :
THENCE d~NTINUE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE'A DISTANCE
OF 183.10 FEET; THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16~$2'35'; THENCE SOUTH-
20~34'22' WEST, ~32.11 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 131.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID-CURVE A DISTANCE OF I49.35 FEET
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65~19'11'; THENCE SOUTH 85~$3'33' WEST,
381.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'06'27" EAST, 64.23 FEET; 'THENCE SOUTH
89~53'33'-WEST, 300.00 FEET TO A'POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF THE PROPOSED 'RESERVE BOULEVARD" EXTENSION ;
~H~NCE DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES;
CONTINUE SOUTH 89'53'33' WEST, 402.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76~40'16'
WE~T, 417.12 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO T~E
NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF $15.59'FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALON~
THE ARC OF'SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 379.64 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 42'11'20· TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE EAST, WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; .THENCE
N~ORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARO OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 74 54 FEET,
THROUGH ~-~-~CENTRAL '
ANGLE OF 86'33'55" TO A POINT ON
THE "EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PROPOSED EXTENSION OF 'LEGENDS DRIVE' AN 80 %
FOOT INGRESS AND EGRESS RIGHT-dF-WAY; ~
, ~EPARTING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF' THE PROPOSED 'RESERVE
BOULEVARD , NOR~H~ASTERLY ALONG SAID PROPOSED
~ ~,--~--~,---~~ EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
~, DRIVE ~E--FD~-OWING COURSES AND DISTANCES.I
~{LTHENCE NORTH $2'04'59" EAST, 128,01 FEET' TO A POINT' OF CURVATURE dF A
CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,. HAVING A RADIUS 0F~"812,04 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 571.9I
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40:~1'04" TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO'THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF
611.85 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID' CURVE A
DISTANCE OF 272.57 FEET, THROUGH~A CENTRAL AN~LE OF 25'3~'30'; THENCE
NORTH 66'54'39' EAST, 405,2~ FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE S,OUTHEAST,' HAVING A-RADIUS OF T$S'.O0 FEET; THENCE ' i
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAiD CURV~ A DISTANc. E OF 249,49 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~9'26'$5,.; THENCE NORTH 86~2~'~3· EAST
474.55 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE dF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST ~AVING A RADIUS OF 906.$9.FEET; THENC~ NORTHEASTERLY A~ONG
THE ARC .OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE dF 124.96'FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 07'53'49. ; ·
THENCE D~PARTtNG SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY RIGHT-OFTWAy LINE OF 'LEGENDS DRIVE',
SOUTH 31'44'36. EAST.il6.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION W'ITH THE AFORE
SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND THE POINT'OF BEGINNING
CONTAINING 30.82 ACRES MORE OR LESS
CURRENT ZONING
PUD - RED
AR-1 - BLUE
RS-2 - GREEN
27-36-39
PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO., INC.
BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER~ P.L.S.
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION .~
FROM AR-1 TO CG
~UL[URE LAND USE
SU - BLUE
RL - RED
CG - GREEN
CT - ORANGE
27-36-39
L
PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO.J INC.
BY AGENT: REGINA KARNERJ P.L.S.
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION
FROM AR-1 TO CG
Agenda Item: ~ 12
File Number: RZ-89-017
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Land Development Manager
April 24, 1989
Petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., by
Agent: Karner & Associates, for a Change in Zoning
from AR-1 (Agriculture, Residential - 1 du/ac) to
CG (Commercial, General).
LOCATI ON:
EEI STING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
PARCEL SI
PROPOSED USE:
S URROUNDI NG ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
FI RE/EMS PROTECTION:
WATER/SEWER SERVICE:
Nortwest quadrant of the intersection of
1-95 & Prima Vista Boulevard.
AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential -
du/ac).
CG (Commercial, General)
CG (Commercial, General)
30.82 Acres
Commercial development in association
with The Reserve, a Development of
Regional Impact.
AR-1 (CT and PUD pending)
This property is directly northwest of
the 1-95 and Prima Vista interchange,
otherwise the parcel is surrounded by
undeveloped land.
Station %3 (Prima Vista) is located 3
I/2 miles to the east.
On site sewer and water facilities to be
provided.
April 24, 1989
Page 2
Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co.
File No.: RZ-89-017
STANDARDS FOR REVIEW:
In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the
Official Zoning Atlas, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
consider and make the following determinations:
Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with
any applicable portions of this Ordinance;
The proposed change in zoning is consistent with
the spirit and intent of the St. Lucie County
Ordinance, CG ~(Commerci al, General) zoning
district regulations.
Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with
all elements of the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Policy Plan;
The proposed change in zoning is consistent with
the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy
Plan.
¸.
Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment is inconsistent with existing and
p=oposed land uses;
The proposed change in zoning is compatible with
the proposed uses in the area.
Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in demands on public
facilities, and whether or to the extent to which
the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity
of such public facilities, including but not
limited to transportation facilities, sewage
facilities, water supply, parks, drainage,
schools, and emergency medical facilities;
The proposed development is not expected to place
excessive demands on public facilities in this
area.
April 24, 1989
Page 3
Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co.
File No.: RZ-89-017
Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in significant adverse
impacts upon the environment.
See Comments
Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in an orderly and logical
development pattern, specifically identifying any
negative effects on such pattern;
The proposed amendment is compatible with the
development policies of the St. Lucie County
Growth Management Policy Plan.
Whether the proposed amendment would be in
conflict with the public interest, and is in
harmony with the purpose and interest of this
Ordinance;
The proposed amendment is consistent
with the public interest and the St. Lucie County
Zoning Ordinance.
COMMENTS
As this Board may recall, in December of 1988, sitting as the
Local Planning Agency, you reviewed a series of Land Use Plan
amendments in conjunction with the review of the Development of
Regional Impact application for The Reserve. One of the many Land
Use Amendments under consideration at the time involved a 30
acre tract of land requested for a Commercial General land Use
Designation. This requested designation was approved by a
unanimous vote of those present in December. Before you now is
the petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., for a change in
zoning from AR-1 to CG, consistent with the land use designation
on this property.
County staff has reviewed this petition and found it
consistent with the standards of review in the St. Lucie County
Zoning Ordinance and St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy
Plan, and in broad terms with the approved Development Order for
The Reserve, as cited in Resolution ~89-73.
April 24, 1989
]Page 4
Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co.
File No.: RZ-89-017
ST. LUCIE COUNTY WOULD REMIND THE PETITIONER, AND ANY
SUBSEQUENT SUCCESSOR THERETO, THAT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNT~ COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION NO. 89-
73, WHICH EFFECT THIS PROPERTY MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. WE WOULD
FURTHER ADVISE THE PETITIONER THAT THE ABOVE CITED RESOLUTION
WILL BE RECOMMENDED FOR INCLUSION AS AN ATTACHMENT ONTO ANY
APPROVAL RE SOLUTI ON ACTED UPON BY THE BOARD OF COUNT~
C OMMI S SI ONE RS.
In a slightly different forwarding action than you are
accustomed to, staff has attached a copy of draft Resolution 89-
120, which would grant approval to this requested change in
zoning. Staff recommends that you forward draft Resolution 89-120
to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of
approval.
If you have any questions on this matter, please let us know.
DJM/RMS
RESV-CGi(RMS-RZ6)
cc: County Attorney
Karner and Associates
RESOLUTION NO. 89-120
FILE NO.: RZ-89-017
A RESOLUTION CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St.
County, Florida, has made the following determinations:
Lucie
1. Callaway Land Cattle Company presented a petition for a
change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural Residential 1 du/ac) to
CG (Commercial General) for the property described below.
2. The St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission,
held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at
least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing and notifying by
mail owners of property within five hundred feet (500') of the
subject property, and has recommended that the Board approve/deny
the hereinafter described request for change in zoning
classification from AR-1 (Agricultural Residential 1 du/ac) to CG
(Commercial General) for the property described below.
3. On , 19 , this Board held a
public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such
hearing in the Fort Pierce News Tribune on ,
and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of
the subject property.
4. The proposed zoning change is consistent with the St.
Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan and has satisfied the
standards of review set out in Section 5.3.300 of the St. Lucie
County Zoning Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida:
A. The Zoning Classification for that property described as
f ol 1 ows:
SEE ATTACHED
owned by , be and the same is
hereby, changed from AR-1 (Agricultural Residential 1 du/ac) to
CG (Commercial General).
B. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is
hereby authorized and directed to cause the changes to be made on
the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make
notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution.
C. Attached as reference and hereby incorporated into the
development reviews required for any activity on this property is
BCC Resolution 89-73, a Development Order for The Reserve, a
Development of Regional Impact.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as
follows:
Chairman Judy Culpepper
Vice-Chairman Havert L. Fenn
Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner
Commissioner Jack Krieger
Commissioner Jim Minix
PAS S ED AND D~LY ADOPTED this
, i989.
day of
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCI E COUNTY, FLORI DA
BY:
CLERK CHAIRMAN
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
ORD89-120
REZONE(B)
COUNTY ATTORNEY
AGENDA - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
THURSDAY
APRIL 27, 1989
7:00 P.M.
Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc.,
Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning
by Agent:
from AR-1
(Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General)
for the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
(Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3
miles south of West Midway Road)
Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and
Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person de-
cides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning
Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting
or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that,
for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to based. Upon the request of
any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a
hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be
granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in
advance of the public hearing will also be considered.
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to
all adjacent property owners April 4, 1989. Legal notice was published
in the News Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in St.
Lucie County, on April 5, 1989.
FILE NO. RZ-89-017
RESERVE P.U.D. SECTION ~"i COMMERCIAL TRACT A - NORTH
REFERENCING THE REVISED INTERCHANGE BOUNDARY~ LINE
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWSI
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF 'THE RESERVE P.U.D.' AS DESCRIBED IN
RESOLUTION NO. 84-1%9 AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4%2 PAGES 667 THROUGH 672
PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89~45'33" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 22,
A DISTANCE OF 984.93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, THENCE
NORTH 89'23'09' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF
95.77 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF A FLORIDA.POWER AND
~ COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 97 PAGE 504-. PUBLIC
RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00~00'11' WE~T ALONG SAID
WESTERLY LINE OF'-~iTHE FLORIDA POWER' AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF'WAY, AND
ALSO. THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY RI~HT-OF-WAY AS
RECOKDED IN O.R. BOOK 120, PAGE 199 THROUGH 201, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCI]
COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE 0F..8_,_~_!6,15 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WIT~
THE PROPOSED WESTERLY RiIGHT-OF-~AY ~F THE INTERSTATE - 95 INTERCH~NOE PARCEL
AS ~L.._II~A~ BY A DESCRIPTION AND MAP OF SURVEY OF THE 1-95 INTERCHANGE -
PRIMA VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID W. BETHAM, P.L.S., WITH FLORIDA
. LUCIE WEST THOMAS J. WHITE DEVELOPMENT
CERTIFICATION NO. $199 WITH THE ST989,~
CORPORATION, DATED JANUARY 30 LAST REVISIONS WITH THE ON FIL2,9 89; THENCE souTHWESTERLy
CONSISTING OF THREE P;AGES~ WITH' ~ NO, 95-1 THROUGH
ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIiGHT OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND ~iSTANCES~.
AFORESAID POINT.OF INTERSECTION BEING A PO/NT ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE NORTHWEST TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH ~J,~_'34'14" EAST,
SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.50 FEET, THENCE SOUT~WkS-~TAqTLY ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE a DISTANCE OF 175.42 FEET; THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF :1J~44'~4"; THENCE SOUTH SP~O-6-~O-'~'.-WRBT, 462.08 FEET TO A
POINT OF 'A CURVE CONCAVE TO SOUTHEAST WITH A RADIUS
OF 621.42 FEET :T~HENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC .OF SAID CURVE ~A
DISTANCE OF 233.68 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21'~2'43" TO :
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE d~NTINUE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE'A DISTANCE
OF 183.10 FEET; THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~6t52'55.; THENCE SOUTH-
20~34'22" WEST, 532.11 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 131.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID-CURVE A DISTANCE OF '149.35 FEET
THROUOH A CENTRAL ANOLE OF 65'19'11"; THENCE SOUTH 85~$3'33' WEST,
381.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'06'27' EAST, 64.2~ FEET; THENCE SOUTH
89'L3'33'.WEST, 300.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIOHT-OF-WAY
OF THE PROPOSED 'RESERVE BOULEVARD" EXTENSION ;
TRENCE DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES;
CONTINUE SOUTH 89~5~'33. WEST, 402.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76~40'16·
WEST, 417.12 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF SlS.SP'FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF'SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 379.64 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 42'11'20' TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE EAST, WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; .THENCE
NORTHEASTE.R~ ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 74.54 FEET,
!~HROU~H A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86'33'55' TO A POINT ON THE "EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PROP(1SED EXTENSION OF 'LEGENDS DRIVE' AN SO %
FOOT INGRESS AND EGRESS RIGHT-OF-WAY;
, ~EPARTING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE PROPOSED "RESERVE
~OULEVARD , NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
LEGENDS DRIVE"--~~ING COURSES AND DISTANCES-I
~i-THENCE ,
NORTH 52'04'59' EAST 128.01 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A
CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,. HAVING A RADIUS OF '812.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 571.91
FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40:~1'04" TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO'THENORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF
611.85 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALON~ THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A
DISTANCE OF 272.57 FEET, THROUOH' A CENTRAL AN~LE OF 25'~'$0'; THENCE
NORTH 66'$4'~9' EAST, 405.~5 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,' HAVINO A RADIUS OF 75S.00 FEET; THENOE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF Z49..49 FEET,
THR,OUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 0F.19'26'$5".; THENCE NORTH 86~21'33' EAST
-- 474.55 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE dF A CU~:VE CONCAVE. TO THE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 906.59..FEET; T~ENCE NORTHEASTERLY A~ONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 124.96 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF ~7'$3'49' ; ~
SOUTH
SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE INTERCHANGE PARCEL AND THE POINT'OF BEGINNING
,
CONTAINING 30.82 ACRES MORE OR LESS
E DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED EASTERLY RIGHT-OFiWAy LiNE OF 'LEGENDS DRIVE",
3i"44'36" EAST.il6.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION W'ITH THE AFORE
CURRENT ZONING
PUD - RED
AR-1 - BLUE
RS-2 - GREEN
27-36-39
AR-I
AR-I
ITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CAI-[LE CO., INC.
BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER, P.L.S.
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION-.
FROM AR-1 TO CG
FUTURE LAND USE
SU - BLUE
RL - RED
CG - GREEN
CT -ORANGE
27-36-39
L
PEIITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO., INC.
BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER, P.L.S.
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION
FROM AR-1 TO CG
THURSDAY
AGENDA - pLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRILT:00 P.M.27' 1989
Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Agent:
Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1
(Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial· General)
for the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
,n: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3 .th of West Midway Road)
Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and
zoning~ commission are electronically recorded. If a person de-
cideS to appeal any decision made by the Planning and zoning
sion with respect to any matter considered at such meeting
or h~ari1 rig, he will need a record of the proceedings,' and that,
i~ .... ~hat a verbatim record of
s~ch purpose, he may need To ensue= u
pLoceedings~ is made, which record includes the testimony and
' upon which the appeal is to based, upon the request of
arty to the proceeding· individuals testifying during a
will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be
an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
a hearing upon request. Written comments received in
adv :e of the public hearing will also be considered-
~rior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to
djacent property owners April 4, 1989. Legal notice was published
Le News Tribune· a newspaper of general circulation in St.
County, on April 5 1989.
· FILE NO. RZ-89-017