The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCallaway Land & Cattle Co (6)FILE NO.: RZ-89-014 A RESOLUTION GRANTI~-FRE~ARY DEVELOPEMNT PLAN APPROVAL FOR~ECTION II ~F THE RESERVE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. On April 27, 1989, the St. Lucie County Planning and Z~ning Commission held a public hearing of which due public notice was published in the Ft. Pierce News Tribune and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 15 days prior to the hearing, and recommended to this Board that Preliminary Development Plan approval for Section II of The Reserve - Planned Unit Development be granted. 2. This Board held a public hearing on May 23, 1989, of which due public notice was published in the Ft. Pierce News Tribune on May 3, 1989 and mailed notice was sent to all property owners within 500 feet. 3. The proposed project is consistent with general purpose; goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan and the Code of Ordinance of St. Lucie CountY. 4. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic 6 3 92/,i. 5 conditions, utility facilities or other matters affecting the parking health, safety and general welfare, if subject to the conditions as outlined in Section A below. 5. The proposed project will be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the area. 6. The proposed project will; not interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, if subject to the conditions as outlined in Section A below. 7. The proposed project will not contravene any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, if subject to the conditions as outlined in Section A below. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, Commissioners of St. Lucie County by the Board of County A. Pursuant to Section 3. 3. 121 of the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, Preliminary Development Plan approval for Section II of The Reserve - Planned Unit Development be, and the same is hereby, approved as shown on the drawings for the project prepared by Team Plan Inc. & Karner & Associates, Sheets 1 thru 17, dated September 1988, and date stamped received by the Department of Community Development on March 23, 1989, and as further described in the accompanying submissions prepared by Karner and Associates and attached as Exhibit B, subject to the following conditions: THE RESERVE SECTION II SPECIAL CONDITIONS ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY RESOLUTION 89-73, THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE DEVELOPMENT .OF REGIONAL IMPACT KNOWN AS THE RESER~-~-~; ARE INCORPORATED BY REFE~NCE AND SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH, AS REQUIRED THEREIN. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATIONS FOR ANY ACTIVITY WITHIN THE AREA DESCRIBED AS THE RESERVE - SECTION II, INCLUDING ROAD, GOLF COURSE AND DRAINAGE NETWORK CONSTRUCTION, FINAL APPROVAL FOR THOSE AREAS IN WHICH THE ACTIVITY IS PROPOSED MUST BE SECURED IN ACCORDANCE WI TH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3. 2. 121, ST. LUCIE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. EACH APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL MUST INCLUDE A DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBPARCEL, INCLUDING ALL THE ENGINEERING AND ARCHI TECTURAL I NFORMATI ON. EACH APPLICATION FOR FINAL PARCEL APPROVAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE REQUIRED APPLICATION FEE OF $600, WHICH IS USED TO DEFRAY THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT REVIEWS AND PUBLIC HEARING PROCESSING. THIS APPLICATION FEE MAY BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARD FEE SCHEDULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, WITHOUT AMENDING THIS RESOLUTION. ALL ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN SECTION II, INCLUSIVE OF ANY SUBPARCEL, MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WI TH MINIMUM COUNTY STANDARDS UNLESS SUPERSEDED BY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORI DA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI ON, OR WHERE PE t~MI TTED OR OTHERWI SE ALTERED THROUGH OFFICIAL ACTION OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, DURING THE FINAL PLAN REVIEW STAGE. 4~ GOLF CART CROSSINGS ON LEGENDS DRIVE MAY BE AT NORMAL GRADE, PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS ARE MET: ALL REQUIRED SAFETY SIGNAGE IS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WI TH ST. LUCI E COUNTY AND FDOT REGULATIONS; ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WI TH APPLI CABLE STANDARDS; UNLESS OTHERWISE AMENDED, THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY TO ALL RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE APPLICABLE PARCEL: OR . 0639 PARCELS 17, 22, 23 - EQUIVALENT TO THE STANDARD & 24 REGULATIONS OF THE RS-4 ZONING DISTRICT; ZERO LOT LINE STANDARDS (MINIMUM) LOT AREA 4, 000 S. F. ROAD FRONTAGE 20 FEET LOT WIDTH 50 FEET BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET BUILDING COVERAGE 50 % PARCELS 14 THRU 16 - EQUIUALENT TO THE STANDARD & 18 THRU 21 REGULATIONS OF THE RM-5 ZONING DISTRICT. ZERO LOT LINE PERMITABLE. BUILDING SPACING TO BE USED FOR ALL MULTI-STORY/ MULTI-FAMILY STRUCTURES. ZERO LOT LINE STANDARDS (MINIMUM) LOT AREA 4,000 S.F. ROAD FRONTAGE 20 FEET LOT WIDTH 50 FEET BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET BUILDING COVERAGE 50 % The property on which this preliminary approval is being granted is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A C. The conditions set forth in Section A are an integral and nonseverable part of the preliminary development plan approval granted by this resolution. If any condition set forth in Section A is determined to be invalid or unenforceable-for any reason, the preliminary development plan approval granted by this resolution shall become null and void. CQ If the develper has not obtained a final development plan I 0639 approval by May 23, 1990, for any portion of the area identified in Section B, pursuant to Section 3. 3. 121 (5), St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance , the preliminary development plan approval granted through this resolution shall become null and void. D. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the Planned Unit Development submissions described in Section A which submissions are to be kept on file by the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, f ol 1 ows: the vote on this resolution was as Chairman Judy Culpepper Vice-Chairman Havert L. Fenn Commissioner Jim Minix Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner Commissioner Jack Krieger AYE ABSENT AYE AYE ABSENT Passed and duly adopted this 23rd day of May, i989 BOA O .-O " ONE,S ST. FLORI DA APPROVED TO FORM AND CORR~T~.SS ~/7 CO¢~T: X~TO~E:) 89-143 rezone ( c ) ~!86 39 ~t~:2 250 EXHIBIT RESERVE ~U.D. SECTION II ''-' ' LESS AND EXCEPTINO THERE FROM. COMMERCIAL TRACT A-NORTH A PARCEL OF LA::D LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 22, 23, 26 AND 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, ~RANGE 3~ 5AST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBEDo:AS ~BEG!N, AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF 'THE RESERVE P.U.D.' AS DESCRIBED'" IN [RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O.R, BOOK 442 PAGES,667 THROOOH '672 {PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCXE COUNT~, FLORIDA% LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID .SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89'45'33 EAST, ALONO SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION'22, IA TI'STAnCE,OF 984.93 FEET TO THE-NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; :"-THENCE ~NORTH 89 36 11' EAST, ALONO THE NORTH LINE OF SAXD SECTION 2~, A DISTANCE OF {95.78 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY-LINE OF A FLORiDA POWER --AND ;LIGHT COMPANY RIOHT-OF-WAy, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 97'TPAGE 504' PUBLIC ~RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE. COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00~00,il, W£S~ ALONG$SAXD ~WESTERLY LINE OF~THE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGht COMP~Ny.;-RIOH%~.OF.WAy;-e~AND ;ALSO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND . LIOHT' COMP~NY':'RXONT-OF~WAY"3 !RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 120, PAOE 199.THROUOH 201,.PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE ;COUNTY, .FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 8,216.~3 FEET TO A POINT OF XNTERSECTION.W~TH 'TEE WESTERLY RIG~T-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE - 95 INTERCHANOE PARCEL ~:.AS 'DELINEATED SY A DESCRIPTION"AND MAP OF SURVE~ OF THE ~95 INTERCHANOE VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID. W. BETHAM, P.L,S,·~ WITH' FLORIDA CERTIFICATION N0..3199 WITH THE ST.' LUCIE WEST THOMAS J, 'WHITE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , DATED JANUARY 30, '1989, 'WITH THO"FILE ~0,='' 95-1 THROUOH.- 95~3! CONSISTINO OF THREE PAOES, WITH ~AST REVISIONS ON 2-9-89;' SAID POINT?OF! Z,NTERSECTION BRUNO A POINT ONA CURVE CONCAVED TO THE NORTHWEST TO WHIC~'A! RADIAL LINE SEARS SOUTH 47'44'1~, EAST· SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.'~0! FEET, THENCE soOTHWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAiD CURVE A DISTANCE OF 175.42~ FEET THROUOH. A cENTRAL ANGLE OF lS,44,14~;.THENCE SOUTH Sg~O0,O0,..WEST, 462.68{ FEET TO A POINT OF'CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO ;THEAST RA6IUS OF 621.42 ~FEET; TH] 2!33.68 FEET, ~I~E'-.THE -' ' -. l.- ....... · . . ..... ~OREBAXD POINT OF INTERSECTX.ON BEINO A ~OINT ON A CURVE'CONCAVE THE NORTHWEST AND TO.WHXC~ A'RADIAL' LINE BEA~S SOU~H SAID CURVE HAViNO A RADIUS OF 906.S9'F~, ~u~uA~ ~,, ......... THE ARC OF SA~D ~URVE.A DISTANCE DF 124.96 PEET, THROUG~-A'J-CENTRAL! POINT or CURVATURE OF A C~RVE CONCAVE TO ~H£ ~OUT~EAST RADIUS OF ?DS.00 FEET; .TR,ENCE SOUTHWESTerLy AL~N~ THE ARC OF C~UE, A DISTANCE OF 24g~.49 .~EET~- THROUGH A 'CENTRAL ' 6ii.85 FEET; 'T~ENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 'ALONG'THE A~C bF SAID -CURVE DISTANCE 0F-2~2.57-FEET,...T~RoUGH A ~ENTRAL, ANGLE;OF PO~ET OF'REVERSE CURVATURE 6F f C6RV~ ~ RADIUS Ot'.S~.O~ FE~T~ THENCE SOUT~WEST~.L~ ALONG T~K-ARC-OF THENCE SOUTH 52 04- 59 WEST:, 128.01 FEET TO AiPOiNT OF ~" ' ...... A,,,,_.A RADIUS OF-$O~O~EET oQUTHWESTERLY ALONO T~E A . .. :.. ;& H =, ............... RC OF SAID CURVE A DISTAN:CE 'WITH TH~ NO ' ' . -..-~. t- ~"~ f~-a, BOULEV ', R~HE~Y.,. RIOHT-OF~WAy ~ LINK OF;.THk{.pR~POSED~.~RESERVE{.~-~ .7 THENCE NORTH 34'28'56' VEST 7~ · .~ r~z 'TO A POINT OF .' CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST'~AVING A RADIUS OF 899,37'FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF%SAID CURVE A DISTANCE 0F~254.83 FEET,. Tt{ROUG~ A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16%~,04,; THENCE NORTH 18'~4'$2" WEST, 784.39 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST WITH A RADIUS OF ~000.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG : THE ARC. OF SAID CURVE 586.18 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF. · 33'35'08'; THENCE NORTH I$'~0'~6" EAST 434.07 FEET TO A' POINT CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS 1,424.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERL?'-'ALONG THE ARC'OF. SAID CURVE~ -. .95!.2~ FEET· THROUGH A CENTRAL ANOLE OF 38'16'24'; 'THENCE NORTH''- 22'56'08' WEST, 732.22' FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE. OF A CURVE- CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVIN~ A RADI~S OF 2,650,00 FEET; T~ENCE . NORTHWESTERLY ALONO THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2S'lS'29"; TNENCE-~ORTH 48~11,S7~: 'WEST,. 2?0.2? FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE 6F A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE'L-' SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4,150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY:. ' "ALONG THE ARC O] D ~RvE A DISTANCE OF 18.74' FEET~'. T~ROU~" A.~'~' ' CENTRAL ANGLE TO'A POINT ON T~E WESTERLY:'RIGHT.0¥.WAy.. LINE B~O EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN ST, LUCIE COUNTY, Fh~RIDA;>% CO~Ti~f'%oRT~WESTERLf LINE OF SAID INGRESS U~EVARD", k DISTANCE OF 228.62: 0 A 'POINT ON THE .EASTERLY1 BEING A POINT ON ,A CURVE CONCAVE TO~ INO A RADIUStOF 50 SAID CURVE! FOLLOWING COURSES .- IMETER NORTHEASTERLy ALONG '" " '' ': -"? SA'ID CURVE A 'DISTANCE' OF 0.88 FEET"' ' THROUGH A CENTRAL AN( OF 0~00'37·, TO A POINT.'-0F COMPOUND: CURVATURE OF A CURVE rE 0 THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF' .- s$=.~,? FEET;, THENCE :AS EELS '~LONG rHEARC 6~ S~ID. CURVE-A'~. DISTANCE OF 4:74.O~ [GH A CENTRAL ANOLE OF 49 01 S~ ~ THENCE'~ NORTH 89'26'31' EAST, ~E'ET; ' THENCE SOUT~ 47~67'11. EA~T,'fl:- 12 4~ 34 WEST, 78, 53'~9' EASTj'235.~2 FEET; 'T~ENCE NORTH 88'14' FEET; THENCE-~ORTH 0~,25. 3ll70,FE~T; THENCE SOUTH 88~54'56. EAST~ .'265.~?'FEE~; ~T~ENCE NORT~i '- - FEET; THENCE NO~TH FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURe?' OF RTNEAST ~AVING.A RADIUS OF 558.80 THENC~ ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE'OF 344.~7~ FEET THROUGH A OF SS'18'35,; T~ENCE. ~ORTH' %0~S3'$5.~' ~AST, 191.70 FEET; NORTH 00'53'55- ' EAST, 614~$9 FEET; THENCE! 137.15 FEET; THEN( NORT~ 09'45'25' EAST,' . : 1,128..20 FEET~ THENCE NORTH 50'56'~5- ~ES.T, ~85.49 N 00'14'1~. EAST, 252~14 FEET- · TO THE POINT ' OF AFORESAID NORTH' LINE OF SAI~ SECTION 22 BEING THE OF BEGINNINg. - . ' . - CONTA!SiN~ $27.2~ ACRES MORE ORLESS. FUTURE LAND USE SU - BLUE RL - RED CG GREEN CT - ORANGE 22, 23, 26, 27'36-39 PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & BY AGENT: FOR A CHAN8E IN FROM AR-1 & PUD TO CO., INC. ,P.L.S, DN . CURR~ENT ZONING PUD - RED AR-1 - BLUE -R$-2 GREEN 22J 23J 26, 27-36=39 PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CAi~TTLE CO., INC. BY AGENT: REGINA KARN~Rj P.L.S. FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION ] FROM AR-1 & PUD TO P~D 22/23/26/27-36-39 RL = RED CG = BLUE CT = PURPLE PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO BY AGENT: KARNER & ASSOCIATES .... FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AR-1 & PUD TO PUD FUTURE LAND USE SU BLUE RL - RED CG - GREEN CT - ORANGE 22, 23, 26, 27-36-39 PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO., INC. BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER, P.L.S. FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM ^R-1 & PUD TO PUD CURRENT ZONING PUD RED AR-1 - BLUE RS-2 - GREEN 22, 23, 26, 27-36-39 PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO., INC. BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER, PiL.Si FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION ~ FROM AR-1 & PUD TO PUD 22?23/26/2?-36-39 RS-2 = PURPLE PUD = RED AR-1 = BLUE PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE BY AGENT. KARNER & ASSOCIATES FOR A CHANfE IN ZONING CLASS'IFICArION FROM AR-1 & PUD TO PUD 22/23/26/27-36-39 RL = RED CG = BLUE CT = PURPLE 'i RL \ \ PETITI~)N OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO.', I BY AGEI1T: KARNER & ASSOCIATES FOR A HANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM Ai-1 & PUD TO PUD / ,, /f AUTOMATED SERVICES USER WORK REQUEST FORM AGENCY REF NBR N_/A__. __ AUTOMATED SERVICES REF NBR CURRENT DATE 3-31-89 REQUESTINGpLANNiNG AGENC~ LABELS [ X ] TAPE MUST BE COMPLETED BY A.S.A.P. REQUESTER: ELISA SANFORD AUTHOR I ZATION: PHONE: ] DISKETTE [ ] REPORT/LISTING [ X] NUMBER OF COPIES 8 Labe~f~ _Ar_R~ports THIS A DUPLICATE OF A APPROX. DATE LAST REQUESTED 1584 DESCRIBE REQUEST: FICHE [ ] PREVIOUS REQUEST [~]~ REPORT IDENTIFIER PLEASE PRINT EIGHT 8 .. SETS OF MAILING LABELS WITH FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE CORRESPONDING REPORT. REPORT MUST INCLUDE TAX I.D. NUMBER, OWNER INFOI~MATION AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTIfX~ FOR THE A~ACHED TAX I.D. NUMBERS. DATE RECEIVED- ~0 BE 'COMPLETED BY AUTOMATED~'SERVoiC~S -- __ DATE: THE RESERVE (3/31/89) 3314-113-0000-0000 Thru 3315-100-0003-0004 Thru 3315-701-0001-0005 Thru 3316-000-0000-0009 Thru 3320-444-0000-0109 Thru 3321-111-0000-0006 Thru 3321-501-0000-0106 Thru 3321-802-0001-0004 .Thru 3321-803-0001-0007 3322-111-0000-0102 Thru 33222313'0001-0006 3322-601-0001-0000 3327-000-0000LD003 3328-111-0001-0004 3328-701-0001-0005 3329-111-0001-0007 3334-111-0000-0109 3420-670-1261-0002 3420-670-1391-0002 3420-720-0062-0002 .Thru Thru Thru Thru Thru Thru Thru Thru Thru Thru 3314-222-0001-0002 3315-334-0002-0006 3315-703-0019-0000 3316-444-0002-0007 3320-444-0002-0000 3321-433-0001-0002 3321-801-0066-0004 3321-802-0037-0005 Thru.-3321-803-0088_0000 3322-233-0026-0002 3322-313-0027-0004 3322-601-0045-0000 3327-441-0001-0005 3328-223-0001-0008 3328-701-0026-0006 3329-111-0004-0008 3334-441-0001-0007 3420-670-1288-0007 3420-670-1396-0007 3420-720-0064-0006 Becket Holding Corp. P.O. Box 1240 Ft. Pierce, FL 34954 RESE : & SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Peacock Fruit & Cattle Corp. Right of Way Land Co. Thos. J. White Dev. Corp. 2180 Park Ave. N. Ste. 320 2500 Midport Rd. Ste. 140 Winter Park, FL 32789 Port St. Lucie, FL 34952 David Ward (TR-ET AL) c/o Grove Man Set Inc-Mondschein 9000 SW 87 Ct. Ste. 218 Miami, FL 33176 A Callaway Land & Cattle Co. 2160 NWReserve Pk. Trace Port St. Lucie, FL 34986 ~eneral Development Corp. 1111 S. Bayshore Dr. Miami, FL 33131 State of FL Road Dept. Road Right-of-way 780 SW 24 St. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33315 SLCAdmin. Bldg. Annex Road Right-of-way 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Karner & Associates 2162 Reserve Park Trace Port St. Lucie, FL 34986 COMMISSION REVIEW: May 23,. 1989 RESOLUTION NO.: 89-143 FILE NO.: RZ-89-016 AGENDA ITEM: MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: County Administrator County Commission Land Development Manager May 15, 1989 Petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner & Associates for a Change in Zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) The Reserve - Section Iii~' On Tuesday, May 23, 1989, you will be asked to review a petition on behalf of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., for a change in zoning from AR-l, and PUD to PUD, for property located on the southeast side of Glades Cutoff Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road (Reserve Section II). The application for rezoning is a part of the Planned Unit Development approval process for the development known as The Reserve. County staff has reviewed this petition and determined it consistent with the Land Development Policies of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, if subject to those conditions as outlined in the attached Resolution 89-143. On Thursday, April 27, 1989, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this petition, and following some discussion on the terms of the recommended conditions of approval, unanimously voted to recommend approval to this development project. Attached, you will find a copy of Draft Resolution ~89-143, our original staff report, and the minutes of the April 27, 1989, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. If you have any questions on this matter, please let us know. May 11, Page 2 1989 Subject: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. RZ-89-016 Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution ~89-143. CONCURRENCE: Ter~ . i ta Development Di rector Dani el . County Attor~ DJM/dj m Attachment RESERVE 5 ( RMS- 8 ) cc: Asst. Co. Admin. Kindred County Attorney County Engineer Regina Karner Daniel Cary Commission Secretary Pres s/Publ i c UI IOFFICIAL- PLANN!NG & ?'"' CO~'tM1S$10N APPROVAL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING APRIL 27, 1989 MINUTES BOARD MEMBERS PRESENt: J. P. 'Terpening, Patricia King, Sciturro, Ken Pruitt, Dixon McCain, Robert Carman, Jo Ann Douglas Skidmore, -and Ralph Flowers (late - 7:30 P.M.) BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: None. OTHERS PRESENT: Krista Storey, Assistant County Attorney; Dennis J. Murphy, Land Development Manager; Chris Bove, Environmental Planner III; and, Dolores Messer, Secretary. TAPES: 1, 2, 3, and 4. PRESS ATTENDANCE: Palm Beach Post INVOCATION: The Invocation was g±ven by Mr. Joseph Sc±turro. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Terpening. Joseph Allen, PUBLIC HEARING-CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO.-FILE NO. RZ'89-016: Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) - The Reserve Section II, located on the southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3 miles south of.West Midway Road. Ms. Regina Karner presented the petition. She chose to stand on her comments made in the previous petition, File No. RZ-89-014. Regarding Staff comments, Mr. Murphy referenced Staff's comments made in the previous petition, File No. RZ-89-014, and stated that Staff has reviewed the proposed development plan and -determined it consistent with the approved Development Order for The Reserve Development. of Regional~ Impact, and recommended approval of the .petition subject to the inclusion of the recommended conditions, as amended with Staff's concurrence. Hearing petition, hearing. no public comment in favor of or in opposition to the Vice Chairman King closed the public portion of- the Regarding Staff's concurrence with suggested changes to some of conditions, Mr~ Carman made a motion that. the petition forwarded to- the Board of County Commissioners with recommendation of approVal. Mr..Pruitt seconded the motion, upon roll call, the Board voted unanimously in favor of motion, with the exception of Mr. Terpening who was out of room. subject request for The Reserve Section II and noting the be 8 and the the Vice Chairman King informed the petitioner's agent that the petition will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Skidmore requested that the County Commissioners be-requested to provide matching comfortable chairs for Room 101, rather than necessitating some Board members to have to sit in straight-back chairs or a Secretary's chair. Mr. Murphy said that Mr. Kurek has been attempting to provide chairs for this room as well as the Board of County Commission chambers for six or seven months° The meeting adjourned at 10:25 P.M. 31 AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY MAY 23, 1989 1730 P.M. Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Agent: Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning from (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Development) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road) If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If.a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matt.er considered 'at such meeting or hearing, he will need. a record of the proceedings, and that, for- such purpose', he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which recordincludes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to 'the proceeding,, individuals testifying during' a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners May 2, 1989. Legal notice was published in the News Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on May 3, 1989. AR-1 Unit following BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /s/ Judy Culpepper, Chairman FILE NO. RZ-89-016 CURVE CO):CAVE TO THE NORTHEAST;~AVING A 'TO A POINT OF.' CURVATURE OF A RADIUS OF 899,37'FEET; THENCE FORTH~ESTEPLy ALONG THE ARC OF~SAID CURVE A DXSTANCE OF~254,S2 FEET,'.' THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16~i4,O4,; THENCE NORTh{ 1B~'~4,$2. WEST, 784.39 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE . NORTHEAST WITH A RADIUS OF 1OO0.O0 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG:' THE ARC_ OF SAID CURVE 586.18 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 0F...- 33'35'08'; THENCE NORTH lS~20'16' EAST 434.07 FEET TO A' POINT CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONcAvE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF~f'. 1,424.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLYL'ALONG THE ARC'OF- SAID CURVE~ . .951.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~8'~6'24"; 'THENCE NORTH~' 22'56'08" WEST, 732.22' FEET TO A POIN~ OF CURVATURE- OF A CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIBS OF 2,6$O,O0'FEET; TNENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A gISTANC~ OF 1,168.'22 · FEET,. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25'15'29,; TRENCE-~ORTH 'VEST, 270.'2? FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE 6F A CURVE CONCAVE.TO THE. k/ SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4,150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY~'. "ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF I8,74' FEET~". THROUgh" A.~'.'' LINECENTRAL ANGLE OF 00"15'~f., TO'A POINT ON THE WESTERLY:~RIGHT.OF.WAy.. . BG. OK EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN ST, LUCXE COUNTY, ~ ~NE ¢O~?I~0~'%ORTHWESTERLf RXOHT-0F-WAY LINE OF SAID ~NORESS! AS-'RESERVE BOULEVARD",' k DISTANCE OF 228.62! OF 0a'09'25" ~0 A 'POINT ON THE EASTERLY~ BEING A POINT ON-A CURVE COnCaVE TO~ S NORT~'$1,00~18~:WEST, SAID CURVE! iAVING A ~ TH ERLY ALONG SA/D EASTERL~ PERXMETERi HE FOLLOWING CO~ T~NCES~ .- .... . . ~ NORTHEASTERLy ALONG SAID CURVE, ~ DISTANCE"' OF' '0,88 '~EET' ""~ THROUGH A 'CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'00 37 , TO A POINT-'OF COMPOUND : CURVATURE OF A CURVE ~VE ~0 T~E SOUTHEAST ~AVING A RADIUS OF -- $$~.97 i EE' IEAS ERLY 'ALONG THE ARC dF SAID CURVE A'~ : DISTANCE OF ~UqH A ~RTRAL ANGLE OF 49'01'$1'~ THENCE'~ NORT~ 89'26'31- ~.4~ FEEx; 'THENCE SOUTH 47~67,ll- 'T~EN~E ~ORTH , : ~ 53 39 EASTj'235.32 E~ ~ 88 14 .17 EAST, 80,18 FEET; THENCE-~ORT~ 01'~$'25' 3I:70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'54,56, EAS~- e*~ ............. ~ O0 25 33 EAST · 7 ~ '. NORTH .-- ' o~ ~ ¢iUR~FC~E°' ~' ~'~ST, S~.~ ~EE~ TO A ~OZNT OF CUR~ATUR~i~' THENCE ,NOR T ~AVING:.A RADIUS OF ~$B.80 FEET~,?~.-'-'~ SAID CURVE A DI~TA:NC~ OF FEET THROUGH A ~ 8"3Se; THENCE ~ORTH EAST, 191.70 FEET :NCE ~OUTH 89'06.'05' EAST,. 614~$9 FEET; THENC~ : NORTH 00'53'55' BO.DO FEET; THENCE NORT~ 09'45'25" EAST,' .. 39' EAST, 1,128-.20 FEET~ THENCE NORTH . NORTH 00'14'17-EAST, 252.14 FEET: . TO ~HE POINT OF ON WITH AFORESAID NORTH' LINE OF SAI~ SECTION 22 BEIiNG THE NT OF BEGINNIN~. CONTX!NiN-~ 527.2~ ACRES HORE OR LESS. RESZRVE ~U.D. SECTION II '' '" LESS AND EXCEPTING THERE FROM. COMMERCIAL TRACT A-NORTH .." A PARCEL OF LAND LYINO WITHIN SECTIONS 22, 23, 26 AND 27,'TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED FOLLOWS~ . , .'~.. BEGIN AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF ~THE RESERVE P,U.D.' AS DESCRIBED'" I~ RE--~UTION NO. 84-1~9 AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK ~42 PAGES 667 THROUGH 67~ PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA-, LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 8g'45'33' EAST, :ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION'22 A DISTANCE OF 984.93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22;~".THENCE NORTH B9'36'11' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 95.78 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY'LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER '-AND ~LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BO0~ 9~'?PAGE 504' PUBLIC iRECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUT~ O0'00~il, WEST ALON~SAID iWESTERLY LINE OF .... THE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMP~NY.:'RIOHT~-OF-WAYfe~AND ;ALSO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND . LIGHT' COMP~NY~:'RIGHT-OF-WAY !RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 120, PAGE 199.THROUGH ~OI,.PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE iCOUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 8,~6.%~ FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION.WITH 'TEE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OP THE INTERSTATE - 95 INTERCHANGE pARCEL.:3AS DELINEATED BY A DESCRIPTION~AND MAp OP SURVEY OF THE I~95 I~TERC~AN~ --PRIM~ VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID-W. ' BE~HAM, ' P.L.S.,< W%~ "F~ORIDA CERTIFICATION N0-.3199 WITH THE ST. ' LUCIE ~EST THOMAS J..'WHITE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , DATED JANUARY 30, '1989, ~WITH T~E'FILE ~OJ" 95-i TRROUGH~ CONSISTING OF TMREE , WITH LAST' REVISIONS ON ~-9-89; SAID POINT f'OF INTERSECTION BEING A : 'RVE CONCAVED TO THE-NORTHWEST TO WHIC~.~'A RADIAL LINE BEARS 7'44'1~" EAST, SAID CURVE HAVINO A RADIUSiOF 600.'$0 FEET, THENCE THE ARC OF S~ID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 1~5.42 FEET THROUGH A OF 16'44'14~;. THENCE SOUT~ $9~O0'O0.'WEST, 462.d8 FEET TO A POINT C~RVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST WiITM A R~IUS OF 621.42 FEET; LY'ALONG THE ARO OF SAID, CURV~ A DISTANCE ¢ 233.68 FEET, T~ROU: AN~LE OF 2f~2'4B.; THENCE NORTH ,~b~44%~ ~EST~ 116.67 INTERSECTION' WI~R TNk LINE-'OF A ~ROt AND E~RES$~' ~AME~ENT :~EREON REFERRED TO AS it} ~.3 EXT~NSION~ ~RENC~-~SOUTHW~_~TER~ ALONO THE EA~Tt SA'ID.'BEOENDS DRIVE" ..THE FOLLOWI~ COURSES AND DIST . . · . . - . . . AFORESAID :POIN~ O~ INTERS£C¥ION ~EX~O'A ~OikT'O~-~--~R~E~CONCAVE ~6iJ~J' THE NO~THW:EST AND TO.WH:XCH ARAD~A5 LINE BEARS sOU~H 11~16,~'~A~T,:~ SAID CURVm RAVING A RADIUS OF 906.Sg',FE~T~-~HENdE SOUT~WESTERLY'.'AB~NG{.~/ THE ARC OF,SAiD CURVE A DISTANCE ~F X~4,96 ~EET, THRg~GR.~A':-6ENTRAB~i~..i ANGLE OF 07'$3'49' 4 'THENCE BOUT~ 86,~1'3~u WEST, 47~$$ PE~T TO: POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE ~OUTREAST !HA~ING A RADIUS OF 735 FEET; .THENCE SOUTHWE~T~,Ly AL~N~ THE ARC OF CURVE A DIS! , , · OF 249.49 FEET,- THROUG~ A 'CENTRAL ANGLE .OF~ 19. 26 55)- ~DUTH ~6"54'39" ~F, ST,' 405.25 PEET TO.A POXNT'i~OF~'7.. CURVATURE 'OE. fE CoNCAvE TO TH~ NbRT~WEST,' HggXR~ A'-RADXUS .OF 611.85 FEET; :E SOUTHWESTERLY 'ALONG'T~E AR~ ~F SAID, CURVE DISTANCE OF-: FEET, '..THROUGH A ~ENTRA~ ANgLE,OF 25L~1 BO'-TO ~.~'~L THENCE SOUTH 52 04 59' WEST, I28.01 FEET T0 A POINT OFFd~R~ATU' ITH .HE NORTNER~Y. RIGHT-OF-WA '. ' : - - -.- - ~--': BOULEVARD. E~T~AT~% - ~e. LINE OF~. THE). /HENCE, DEPARTING SAID EASTERL~ RIG~T-OFaWAy LINE DRIVE', ~O. RI~~ ALbNO SAID NORTheRLY RI6HT-OF-~AY.LIN~ OF 'R~SERVE BOULEVARO' EXTENSION THE FOLLOWING CO~RSES'AND. DI~TANOES~.'.'i{~'. ~.~,_.-~ Agenda Item: File Number: ~ 14 RZ-89-016 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Commission Land Development Manager April 24, 1989 Petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner & Associates, for a Change in.Zoning from AR-1 (Agriculture, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD Planned Unit Development) - ~The Reserve Section II. LOCATI ON: EXI STING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: S URROUNDI NG Z ONI NG: SURROUNDING LAND USES: FI RE/EMS PROTECTION: WATER/SEWER SERVICE: Southeast side of Glades .Cutoff..Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road. AR-1 (Agricultural, du/ac), and PUD Development) Residential - 1 (Planned Unit PUD ('Planned Unit Development) RL ('Residential, Low Density - 5 du/ac) 527.23 Acres To achieve unified zoning, for. The Reserve, ~ a. mixed use residential development at a gross density of approximately 2 du/ac. AR-l, RS-2 and PUD The section is currently surrounded by undeveloped land, except for the 1-95, Prima Vista interchange to the east. Station ~3 (Prima Vista) is located 3 1/2 miles to the east. On site sewer and water facilities to be provided. April 24, 1989 Page 2 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89~0t6 STANDARDS FOR REVIEW: In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of this Ordinance; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the spirit and intent of the St. Lucie County Ordinance, PUD (Planned Unit Development) .zoning district regulations, if subject to the conditions as cited below. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Growth Manaqement Policy Plan; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, if subject to the conditions as cited below. Whether and the extent to which .the proposed amendment is inconsistent with existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning is compatible with the proposed uses in the area. Whether and the ~extent to which the proposed amendment would~ result in demands on public facilities, and'whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, and emergency medical facilities; (See Comments ) April 24, 1989 Page 3 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File NO. : RZ-89-016 5o Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant ad'verse impacts upon the environment. (See Comments) o Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern, specifically identifying any negative effects on such pattern; The proposed amendment is compatible with the development policies of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, if subject to the conditions as cited below. o Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and interest of this Ordinance; The '~oposed amendment is consistent with the public interest and' the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, if subject to the conditions as cited below. COMMENTS In December .of 1988, this Board held a public hearing on the proposed Development Order. for The. Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact.. Before yOu now is the application for Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the subsection of The Reserve .known as The.Reserve- Section II. This Section is essentially that area lying north of Reserve Boulevard, not previously included with The Reserve PUD - Section t. Attached you will find a copy of the preliminary development plan for this project. As with all PUD' s the application before you is for preliminary approvals only. Preliminary approval does not constitute authorization for the developers to commence any construction in any area that requires further approval from St. Lucie County or any other lawfully charged authority. Final Plan April 24, 1989 Page 4 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-8.9-016 approval documents are to be submitted and reviewed in accordance with the provisions as outlined in Section 3. 2. 121, St. Lucie County Zoning Ordi'nance. In reviewing the preliminary development plans for this Section, County staff has determined it to be generally compliant with all minimum requirements, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval. THE RESERVE SECTION II SPECIAL CONDITIONS ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY RESOLUTION 89-73, THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT KNOWN AS THE RESERVE; ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AND SHALL. BE COMPLIED WITH, AS REQUIRED THEREIN. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF' ANY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATIONS' FOR ANY ACTIVITY WITHIN THE AREA DESCRIBED AS THE RESERVE '~' SECTION II, INCLUDING ROAD, GOLF COURSE AND DRAINAGE NETWORK. CONSTRUCTION, FINAL APPROVAL FOR THOSE AREAS IN WHICH THE ACTIVITY IS PROPOSED MUST BE SECURED IN ACCORDANCE WI TH THE PROVISIONS OF ~ SECTION 3. 2. 121, ST. LUCIE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. EACH APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL MUST INCLUDE A DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBP/~RCEL, INCLUDING ALL. THE ' ENGINEERING. AND ARCHI TECTURAL I NFORMATI ON. EACH APPLICATION FOR FINAL PARCEL APPROVAL MUST BE ACCOMPANYIED BY THE REQUIRED APPLICATION FEE OF $600, WHICH IS USED TO DEFRAY THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT REVIEWS AND PUBLIC HEARING PROCESSING. THIS APPLICATION FEE MAY BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARD' FEE SCHEDULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, WITHOUT AMENDING ACTION TO THIS RESOLUTION. April 24, 1989 Page 5 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89'=016 ALL ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN SECTION II, INCLUSIVE OF ANY SUBPARCEL, MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WI TH MINIMUM COUNTY STANDARDS UNLESS SUPERSEDED BY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, OR WHERE PERMITTED OTHERWISE ALTERED THROUGH OFFICIAL ACTION OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, DURING THE FINAL PLAN REVIEW STAGE. GOLF CART CROSSINGS ON LEGENDS DRIVE MAY BE AT NORMAL GRADE, PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS ARE MET: ALL REQUIRED SAFETY SIGNAGE IS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND FDOT REG ULATI ONS; ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS; Co ILLUMINATED WARNING DEVICES SHALL BE REQUIRED TO IDENTIFY THE CROSSING SITE(S). THESE DEVICES MAY BE PLACED ON A TIMING DEVICE SO THAT THEY WOULD ONLY OPERATE DURING THE HOURS OF GOLF COURSE OPERATION BUT MUST BE OPERATIONAL SEVEN DAYS A WEEK, ALL YEAR LONG. o UNLESS OTHERWI SE AMENDED, THE FOLLOWING MI NIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY TO ALL RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE APPLICABLE PARCEL: PARCELS 17, 22, 23 - EQUIVALENT TO THE STANDARD & 24 REGULATIONS OF THE RS-4 ZONING DISTRICT; PARCELS 14 THRU 16 - EQUIVALENT TO THE STANDARD & 18 THRU 21 REGULATIONS OF THE RM-5 ZONING DISTRICT. ZERO LOT LINE PERMITABLE, BUILDING SPACING TO BE USED FOR ALL MULTI-STORY/ MULTI-FAMILY STRUCTURES. April 24, 1989 Page 6 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-8.9~016 ZERO LOT LINE STANDARDS (MINIMUM) LOT AREA 4, 000 S. F. ROAD FRONTAGE 20 FEET LOT WIDTH 50 FEET BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET BUILDING COVERAGE 50 % Although not reflected in any of the recommended conditions of approval, it should be noted that in accordance with the direction of the Board of County Commissioners, the approval for the roadway design alignment at the intersection of Reserve Boulevard/Prima Vista Boulevard has been deferred to the Florida Department-of Transportation. Though the Department has given a -."conceptual" approval to the present schematic arrangement of this alignment, they. point out that there remains some concern about the westerly approaches accessing this interchange. Most specifically there remains the unresolved question of compliance with the 1984 Interchange justification report for 1-95 and Prima Vista BouleVard, and the statements contained therein assuring a complete public assess route from Glades Cut-off Road to 1-95. These concerns were again conveyed' to project engineers in copies of correspondence received in my office as recently as April 20, 1989. - .... Noting the above comments and conditions, Staff would recommend that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. If you have any questions, please let us, know. DJM/la RES-IIa(RMS-REZ) cc: County Administrator County Attorney County Engineer Fire Marshal Regina Karner Daniel M. Cary CURRENT ZONING PUD - RED AR-1 - BLUE ~RS-2 - GREEN 23, 26, 27-36'39 PETITION OF CALLAWAYLAND & CATTLE CO., INC. BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER,~P.L.S. FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AR-1 & PUD TO PUD PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CAt-II_E CO., INC. BY AGENT: -REGINA KARNER, p.L.S. FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AR-t & PUD TO PUD RESOLUTI ON 89-143 FILE NO.: RZ-89-014 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPEMNT PLAN APPROVAL FOR SECTION II OF THE RESERVE A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. On April 27, 1989, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing of which due public notice was published in the Ft. Pierce News Tribune and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 15 days prior to the hearing, and recommended to this Board that Preliminary Development Plan approval for Section II of The Reserve - Planned Unit Development be granted. 2. This Board held a public hearing on May 23, 1989, of which due public notice was published in .the Ft. Pierce News Tribune on May 3, 1989 and mailed notice was sent to all property owners within 500 feet. 3. The proposed project is consistent with general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County ~Zoning Ordinance, the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan and the Code of Ordinance of St. Lucie County. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, utility facilities or other matters affecting the parking health, safety and general welfare, if subject to the conditions as outlined in Part below. 5. The proposed project will be~ consistent with the of existing land uses in the area. character 6. The proposed project will; not interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, if subject to the conditions as outlined in Part below. 7. The proposed project will not ~contravene any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, if subject to the conditions as outlined in Part below. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, Commissioners of St. Lucie County by the Board of County A. Pursuant to Section 3.3.121 of the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance~ Preliminary Development Plan approval for Section II of The Reserve - Planned Unit Development ~be,. and the same is hereby, approved as shown on the drawings~ for the project prepared by ~Team Plan Inc.. & Karner & Associates, Sheets ~ thru 17, dated September 1988, and date stamped received by the Department of Community Development on Mar~h 23, 19-89, and as further described in the ac¢.ompanying submissions prepared by Karner and Associates and attached as exhibit , subject to the following conditions: THE RESERVE SECTION II SPECIAL CONDITIONS ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY RESOLUTION 89-73, THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT KNOWN AS THE RESERVE, ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AND SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH, AS REQUIRED THEREIN. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATIONS FOR ANY ACTIVITY WITHIN THE AREA DESCRIBED AS THE RESERVE - SECTION II, INCLUDING ROAD, GOLF COURSE AND DRAINAGE NETWORK CONSTRUCTION, FINAL APPROVAL FOR THOSE AREAS IN WHICH THE ACTIVITY IS PROPOSED MUST BE SECURED IN ACCORDANCE WI TH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3. 2. 121, ST. LUCIE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. EACH APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL MUST INCLUDE A DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBPARCEL, INCLUDING ALL THE ENGINEERING AND ARCHI TECTURAL I NFORMATI ON. EACH APPLICATION FOR FINAL PARCEL APPROVAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE REQUIRED APPLICATION FEE OF $600, WHICH IS USED TO DEFRAY THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT REVIEWS AND PUBLIC HEARING PROCESSING. THIS APPLICATION FEE MAY BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARD FEE SCHEDULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, WITHOUT AMENDING THIS RESOLUTION. ALL ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN SECTION II, INCLUSIVE OF ANY SUBPARCEL, MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WI TH MI NI MUM COUNTY STANDARDS UNLESS SUPERSEDED BY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, OR WHERE PERMITTED .OR OTHERWI SE ALTERED THROUGH OFFICIAL ACTION OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, DURING THE FINAL PLAN REVIEW STAGE. GOLF CART CROSSINGS ON LEGENDS DRIVE MAY BE AT NORMAL GRADE, PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS ARE MET: so ALL REQUIRED SAFETY SIGNAGE IS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND FDOT RE GULATI ONS; ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS; UNLESS OTHERWI SE AMENDED, THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY TO ALL RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE APPLICABLE PARCEL: PARC.ELS 17, 22, 23 - EQUIVALENT TO THE STANDARD & 24 REGULATIONS OF THE RS-4 ZONING DISTRICT; ZERO LOT LINE STANDARDS (MINIMUM) LOT AREA 4,000 S.F. ROAD FRONTAGE 20 FEET LOT WIDTH 50 FEET BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET BUILDING COVERAGE 50 % PARCELS 14 THRU 16 - EQUIVALENT TO THE STANDARD & 18 THRU 21 REGULATIONS OF THE RM-5 ZONING DI STRI CT. ZERO LOT LINE PERMITABLE. BUILDING SPACING TO BE USED FOR ALL MULTI,STORY/ MULTI-FAMILY STRUCTURES. ZERO LOT LINE STANDARDS (MINIMUM) LOT AREA 4,000 S.F. ROAD FRONTAGE 20 FEET LOT WIDTH 50 FEET BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET BUILDING COVERAGE 50 % B. The property on which this preliminary approval is being granted is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT C. The conditions set forth in Section-__ are an 'integral and nonseverable part of the preliminary development plan approval granted by this resolution. If any condition set forth in Section is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the preliminary development plan approval granted by this resolution shall become null and void. If the develper has not obtained a final development plan approval by May 23, 1990, for any portion of the area identified in Part , pursuant to Section 3. 3. 121(5), St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance , the preliminary development plan approval granted through this resolution shall become null and void. D. A copy of this resolution shall be Unit Development submissions described in Section submissions are to be kept on file by the St. Community Development Director. attached to the Planned which Lucie County After motion and second, follows: the vote on this resolution was as Chairman Judy Culpepper Vice-Chairman Havert L. Fenn Commissioner Jim Minix Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner Commissioner Jack Krieger XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX Passed and duly adopted this 23rd day of May, 1989 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN ATTEST: APPROVED TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY 89-143 rezone(c) CUR~E CONCAVE TO THE NOR~WmA~-b ..... ~E~ TO A POINT F . CURVATURE OF A ..... r -,,~o~ ~avz~u A RAD 0F - ~0RTH"-STERLY ALONG THE A~C O~'S .......... ~U~_ . 899.37, FaET; THENCE 14 04 ; THENCE NORT]{ 1B~14,$2. WEST 784.39' FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO T~E NORTHEAST WITH A RADXUS OF 1000.00 FEET; T~ENCE NORThWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC. OF SA£D CURVE 586 ~8 33'35'08-; THENCE ', ~EET,__THROUGH A CENTRAL CURVATURE NOR~. 1S.20 16' ~AST 434 07 F . ANGLE O~... ~u&- ALONG THE ARC'OF- SAID .~$~.2~ TEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF , , · 22 $6 08 WEST 7 ' ~8 i6 24 ; 'THEN · 32.22 FEET TO A ' CE NORT~ CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST u. ...... P~ OF CURVATURE. OF A CURVE- ' NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 'UEST,tCcT" THROUGH A CENTRALTo A ANGLE OF 2S'1S'~"'~ ; ..... TH~NCE-NORTHL 48'11'37':i'168'~2 - SOUTHWEST ATURE 6F A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE':.-' · ' ALONG TEE ' CENTRAL ANGLE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THROUGH A CURVATURE OF 553.97 FEET; DISTANCE OF NORTH 89' 1iO.08 FEET; 12~4~,~4· 'T~ENCE NORTH ~ 31.70 FEET; THENCE :SOU 00'25'33' EA .FEET; OF A THENCE FEET EAST, 191.70 Ft NORTH 00'S3'SS' 137.18 FEET; $0'$6'15- TO THE POINT OF SECTION 22 BEING THE POINT SAID CURVE A 'DISTANCE' OF 0.88 F~ET" 3LE OF O1~00,37,, TO A POINT.'-OF COMPOUND: ST ~AVINO A RADIUS OF' - THE ARC 6F SAID CURVE- TEAL ANGLE OF 49'O1'$~,} THENC~ ' T, .943.43 FEET; 'THENCE SOUT~ 47~67'~1" 350.~6 FEET~CTNENCE NORTH..-~' 36~$3'3~" EAST;':235.32 T~ENCK.NORTH 0~'~3'25. · 265.~7 FEET~ '~THENCE NORT~ '- - NORTH ~5'31'05% HIST, 1,S60.fS.·' · ~4 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURf?' -: .A RADIUS OF 558.80 FEET;;~~. CURVE A DISTANCE OF 344.~7]. ; TRENCH NORTH' 614~S9 FEET~ THENC~ : O9'45'25' EAST,' . FEET~ THENCE NORTH O0'14'I7. EAST, 252.14 FEET2 .. AFORESAID NORTH ' LINE OF SAI~ ~N'~="~NG-,- 527.2B ACRES MORE OR LESS, LESS AND EXCEPTINO THERE FROM. COMMERCIAL TRACT A-~ORTH A PARCEL OF LA::D LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 22, 23, 26 AND 27, 'TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, ~KA~:GE 3g EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED¢: AS ?OLLOUS~ ' BEGIN AT THE NORTHEASTERLy CORNER OF "THE RESERVE P.U.D.' AS DESCRIBED"' IN RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 442 PAGES 667 THROUOH 672 PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTX, FLORIDA% LYING ON THE NORTH LINE,OF SA'ID SECTION 22; THENCE souTH 89'45'33" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION'22, A DISTAnCE,OF 984.93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22;'".THENCE NORTR ~9 36 11' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 95.78 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY'LINE OF A FLORIDA PO~ER "ANE iLIGRT COMPANY RtOHT-OF-VAy, AS RECORDED IN O.R BO0~ 9~'~PAGE $04' PUBLIC ~RECORDS OF ST. ~WESTERLY LINE ~ ~UORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANy.:'RIOH~.OF.WAYi~AND iALSO THE VEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND ~RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 120, PA~E 199 THROUGH 20~, PUBLIC RECORDS 0 ;COUNTY, FLORIDA, D ' ' F ST. LUCIE , A ISTANcE OF S,216.1~ PEET TO A POINT DELINEATED BY A DESCRIPTION--AND M o~ ~.~.nv .. ,, ........ HA~gE pARCEL~.A~ VISTA. BOULEVARD, PREP~R~n - ~, ~ ~,v~u - w. SETHAM, P.L.S.,' WITH -FLORXDA CERTI~FICATION N0-.3199 WITH THE .=ST..' J.-'~HITE CORPORATION , DATED JANUARY 30, '1989 NO.=-. 95-1 CONSISTINO OF THREE PAGES, WITH INTERSECTION BEkNG -A RADIAL LINE SEARS SOUT~ FEET, THENCE SOOTHWESTERLY AL( FEET THROUOH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16~'44, FEET TO A POINT'OF CURVA OF 62'~.42 FEET; TRENCE 233.68 FEET, THROUGH UEST~ 1~6%67 FEET TO [''OF A AND AFORESAID POIN~'OF n THE NO~T~VE~T AND T0.WHIC~ SAiD CURVE HAViiNG A ARC OF SAI~D CURVE A DISTANt CURVATURE OF A'CURVE CONOAVE TO T~E ~OUT~EAST HAVING A ~-' CURVERADIUS AOFDIsTAiNCE?3S'O0 FEETJOF .T~ENCE CURVATURE-0~; $~UTH~EST~RLY ALONG THE OF .T~RgUOH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 'VIT~ T~E NORTHERLY. RIGHT-OF~Ay~ L~E BOULEVARD. EXTENSION% ~-~- . 7HENCE, DEPARTINO SAID kASTERLf K&irner & Associates Planners, Surveyors and Development Consultants 2162 Reserve Park Trace · Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 . (407) 468-4343 MEMOMR ANDUM UUi NAY 21989 I THE RESERVE PUD SECTION II AND III REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) APPLICATION AND COMMERCIAL TRACTS A - NORTH AND B - SOUTH REZONING APPLICATION. David Ward Michael Gordon Pete McDonough John Holcomb Dennis Murphy NOTE: AB~DEFGH - Denotes deleted items ~.BCDEFGH - Denotes added items On the evening of Thursday, April 24, 1989, the Planning and Zoning Comission voted unannimously to recomend approval by the Board of County Commissioners of the petition to change certain zoning to CG (Comission General) for the area known as Comercial Tract A-North and certain zoning to CT (Commercial Tourist) for the area known as Commercial Tract B-South as set forth in the April 24, 1989 Memorandum File Number RZ-89-Ol? and RZ-89-015 respectively. (See Attached) In addition, the Planning and Zoning Comission voted unannimously to re¢omend approval by the Board of County Commissioners of the petition for changing zoning to PUD (Planned Unit Development) and therefore the preliminary PUD of the Reserve PUD Section II,(Agenda Item 14~File Number RZ-89-016) and Reserve PUD Section III (Agenda Item 15-File Number RZ-89-014) with the following amendements to the original Memorandums for Agenda Item 14 and Agenda Item 15 (See Attached): TUESD~ -~ AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAY 23, 1989 1:30 P.M. Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Agent: Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road) If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered ~t such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners May 2, 1989. Legal notice was published in the News Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on May 3, 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /s/ Judy Culpepper, Chairman FILE NO. RZ-89-016 LESS AND EXCEPTING THERE FROM COMMERCIAL TRACT A-NORTH A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 22, 25, 25 AND 27, TOWNSHIP $6 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED:~AS FOLLOWS~ .... :.. ,......:-{.... ~ .' ,'i?. :.. ..... .- ~.->., ..? BEGIN AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF WTNE RESERVE P,U,D,"'AS' DESCRIBE'Di:(~!NI RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O,R, BOOK 442 PAGES 667 THROUGH/"6?21 PUBLIC'RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA',' LYING ON THE.NORTH LINE OF'SAID SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89'45'$$" EAST,'ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION"22 A DISTANCE OF 984,93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION. 22;~',".THENCE NORTH 89'36'11' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF. 95..78 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER '.AND LIOHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O,R, BOOK 9~":"~AGE 504' PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00'00'il, WES.T ALONG'.~SAID WESTERLY LINE /. OF~THE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT ALSO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT' COMPANY'":'RIG~T-OF-WAY':~>'A~ RECORDED IN O,R, BOOK 120, PAGE 199 THROUGH 201, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST, LU~IE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 8,216,15 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH 'THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE' INTERSTATE - 95 INTERCHANGE RARCEL.-~;'AS 'DELINEATED BY A DESCRIPTION AND MAP OF SURVEy OF T~E I~95 INTERCHANGE VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID W. BETHAM, P.L~S.," WITH ' FLORIDA CERTIFICATION N0..3199 WITH THE ST, LUCIE WEST THOMAS J .'WHITE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , DATED JANUARY $0, 1989, "WITH THE FILE N0~'"95-1 CONSISTING OF THREE PAGES, WITH LAST'REVISIONS ON 2-9-89; 'SAID POINT?OF~ INTERSECTION BEING A POINT ON A CURVE cONCAVED TO THE NORTHWEST TO WHIC~,!"A! FEET, THENCE SOOTHWESTERLY ALONG,TH~ A? OF SAID CU,VE A,DI~TA~CE OF ~5.421 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~6 44 14'; THENCE S6UTH 59 O0 O0 'WEST, 462,6'8 WEST~ 116.67 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION'WITH T~E EASTERLY'RIGHT-OFm'WAyI LINE:'OF A PROPOSED 80.00 FOOT INGRESS AND E~RES$/ ~AS=zENT :~EREON '-AFTERI REFERRED TO AS THE PROPOSED "LEGENDS.DRIVE .. EXTENsION~ ~NENCE'~'SOUT~WESTERLY ~NO THE EAnT. E.RLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LI~E OF SAID.#LEGENDS DRIVE" ..THE FOLLOWING CouRsES AND DISTANCES~ . . . . AFORESAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING A POINT'ON"A'""cUR~E'CONCAVE THE NORTHWEST AND TO WHICH A'RAD~AL LINE BEAR~ SOUTH SAID'CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF gO6,Sg',FEET;.~EN~E SOUTHWESTE~LY-ALONGh~i,.... THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE DF Z~4,g6 FEET, TNROUG~'A ';'CENTRAS![~". ANGLE OF 07"5~'4g, ; 'THENCE SOUTH S6'2~'$~" WEST, '74~55 FEET TO: A ;. POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE ~OUTHEAST ~AVING A RADIUS OF ?$5,00 FEET; ..THENCE SOUTHWESTerLy ALON~ THE ARC OF 'SA'ID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 249,49 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF.t/.' I9.'26'$5,) THENCE SOUTH ~6~54'~9. WF.~T,' 405,25 FEET TO A CURVATURE OF. A CURV% CONCAVE TO THE N~RT~WEST,' HAVING A'-RADIUS .OF 611.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 'ALON~'T~E AR~ OF SAID CURVE DISTANCE 0F.272,57. FEET, '.,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25'~1'~0'.T0 'POINT REVERSE CURVATUR OF ^' CORV " ONC V TO'' ' A RADIUS 0F'812.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG TN~ AR~.OF · THENCE SOUTH S~ 04 S~ WEST, ~28,0~ ~ET.TO.~ POIN~.O~ffttt~ATURE' CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,~AVX~g..A .' OUOH.. A CENTRAL. ANOLE OF OI"09,~4W'.'T. ....... . 0 ..... T~ ...... ~O~NT...,~ OF-'~.'~N'"'"'~;:, ......... ~RSEO~ION.,:~,.,::.' ........ .... ~'~";:"" ~uuu~va~D EXTENSION; ,'ff" . , ~.'. ' F.', ...?, .......,....,~'~"~'~.4.,~ ...... - ' . . , .-- ,,~ v~ o~r~V~V~D ~:'WLE0 '' ,DRIVE , ALONG S ZD T ENCE NORTH - W ST, 'TO A POINT OF.. URVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST'~AV~NG A RADIUS OF 899,~?,;FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF%SAID CURVE A DISTANCE 0F-i{254.83 FEET,'. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16%~4,04,; THENCE NORTH 18~4,$2, WEST, ' 784.39- FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE .- NORTHEAST WITH A RADIUS OF 1000.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 586,i8 FEET, 'THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF." 33'35'08,'.; THENCE NORTH 15'20'16' EAST 454.07 FEET TO A' POINT CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS 1,424.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY'..'ALONG THE ARC'OF. SAID .951.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF $8'16'24"; 'THENCE NORTH 22'$6'08' WEST, 732.22' FEET TO A POIN~ OF CURVATURE-'"OF A C'URVE~ CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVIN~ A RADI,US OF 2,650.00 FEET~ THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 1,168.22 ' FEET,, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25~10,29.; THENCE.NbRTH 48~11,37.: 'WEST, 270.27 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE ~F A CURVE cONCAVE.TO THE.;... SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4,100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY:. ' ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 18.74' FEET,'...'THROUG~'' CENTRAL ANGLE OiF 00'15'~., TO'A POINT ON THE WESTERLY~'RIGHT-OF-WAY .-- LINE OF RESERVE BLVD INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN O.R~ BO.O~ 448 PAGE 2468, PUBLIC .,RE~ORDS ~F ST, LUCIE COUNTY, ALONGTHENCE THE DEPARTING ARC.OF .SAIDsA}DPROPosED NORTH RI~HT-OF-WAY L~NE coNTIN~''~ORTHWES~ERLf' CURVE AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT .REFERRED TO AS "RESERVE BOULEVARD", A. DISTANCE OF 228.62 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0~09'2~. TO A POINT ON THE .EASTERLY PERIMETER OF AFORESAID 'RESERVE P.U..D."~ BEING A POINT ON .A CURVE CONC'AVE TO THE SOUTHEAST. TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH'$1,OO~lS#:WEST, SAID CURVE HAVING Al RADIUS OF 50.00; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY PERIMETER THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES~ .. . .... NORTHEASTERLy ALONG SAID CURVE A DISTANCE' OF 0.88 FEET' THROiUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01~00'$7., TO A POINT. OF COMPOUND~ CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF .' 553.197 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 'ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE. A'"" DISTANCE OF 474.06 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49'01'5~") THENCE'i!! '..! NORTH 89'26'31, EAST, 940.4~ FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47.~07'I1, EAST,' ilO.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54'03'26' EAST, ~$0,~6 FEET;'~..THENCE NORTHi.'~ ~' 12~44'34" WEST, 78.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH $0($~'$9, EAST/2SL.$2 FEET;~'~.~ THENCE NORTH 8S~14,17. EAST, 80~18 FEET; THENCE.~ORTH 0~'~$'25" EAST,:% 31.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'$4'$6" EAST,. 260o~7 FEET; ~?THENCE NORTHi'. . 00~20'33" EAST ', 177.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH ~5'~1'05~ E~ST, 1,~60.15,..!~'.' FEET; THENCE NORTH 34'24'38" WEST, $?.~4 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURe? " OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING .A RADIUS OF 558.80 FEET;?~'~'. '''~ THENCE NORTHWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF $44.~7I' FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 'OF $5~18'~'; THENCE NORTH' '00~50'55.:' EAST; 191.70 FEET~ THENCE SOUTH 89'06'05" EAST, 614,~9 FEET; THENCEi NORT~ 00'50'$$. EAST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09~4~25. EAST/ 137.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH ~6'27'~9" EAST, 1',~28..20 FEET~ THENCE NORTH 50'$6'10" WEST, 385.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'~4'17" EAST, 252.14 FEET;.. TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID NORTH LINE OF AID. S ' SECTiON 22 BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAININ~ 527.23 ACRES MORE OR LESS. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION6RS May 2, 1989 DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TERRY L. ~RTA In compliance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance you are hereby advised that Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Agent: Karner & Associates, has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road) The Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on this petition at 1:30 P.M. on Tuesday, May 23, 1989 in St. Lucie County Commission Chambers, third floor of County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. Ail interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The petitioner wishes to provide unified zoning for the proposed Reserve PUD, Section II. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter con- sidered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. If you should have any questions, additional information may be obtained by calling~Area Code 407, 468-1553. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST..~UCI~ ~O~NTY, FLORIDA HAVERT L. FENN District No I · JU~Y CULPEPPER District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER. District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 5 County Administrator -- WELDON BE LEWIS 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Director: (407) 468-1590 · Building: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407) 468-1576 Zoning: (407) 468-1553 · Code Enforcement: (407) 468-1571 THENCE NORTH §4'28;$6. W§ST, 7~'o~'"'F~ET 'TO A POINT OF .':"CURVATURE OF CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST'~AV~NG A RADIUS OF 899,$7.,iFEET; THENCE '. NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF!SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF.i%2S4~85 FEET,':' THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16%X4,04.; THENCE NORTH X8~4,$2. WEST, 784.39' FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE .. NORTHEAST WITH A RADIUS OF 1000.00 FEET; T~ENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG':" I THE ARC. OF SAID CURVE 586.~8 FEET, 'THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF.. 33'35'08'; THENCE NORTH 15~20'16' EAST 454.07 FEET TO A' POINT- OF'.~--- CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF~!~:!?'' 1,424.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY'..'ALONO THE ARC'OF. SAID .951.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGL~ OF $8'16'24"; '.THENCE NORTH:' 22'56'08, WEST, 732.22' FEET TO A POIN~ OF CURVATURE."OF A CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVXN~ A RADI,US OF 2,650.O0'FEET~ T~ENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF .SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 1,168.22 FEET,. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25~15'29"; THENCE'N~RTH 48%11'37.: 'WEST, 270.27 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE ~F A CURVE cONCAVE.TO THE.:.. SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4,1~0.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY:'... ' ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 18.74' FEET;'-: THROUGH" A. CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'15'~1', TO'A POINT OH T~E WESTERLY~'RIGHT-OF-WAY-] LINE OF RESERVE BLVD INGRESS AND EGRESS. EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN O.R, BOOK 448 PAOE 2468, PUBLIC REgORDS OF ST, LUCIE COUNTY, FHENCE DEPARTIN~ .SAID'PROPosED NORT~'RiGHT-OF-WAy L~NE CONTXN~''~ORTHWESTERLf ALONG THE ARC OF SA~D CURVE AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID INGRESS AND EGiRESS EASEMENT REFERRED TO AS 'RES~RV~ B~ULEVARD", a. DISTANCE OF 228.62 FEET, ~HROUGH a CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~ 09 25 TO A ~POINT ON THE EASTERLYi PERIMETER OF AFORESAID RESERVE P.U,D. , BEING A POiNT,ON A CURVE CoN~VE TO! THE SOUTHEAST. TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE B~ARS NORTH'S1 O0 18#:WEST, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY A£ONO SA.~D EASTERLY PERIMETER THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES; "'' ' '" .i. ".'/'ii i' NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE A 'DISTANCE' OF 0.88 F~ET' THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01~00'$7,, TO A POINT. OF COMPOUND: CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST NAVIN~ A RADIUS OF $$3.97 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 'ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE DISTANCE OF 474.06 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49'01'51"~ THENCE"i.~ NORTH 89'26'31. EAST, .945.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47.~07'11. EAST, 110.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54'05'26" EAST, $$0.~6 FEET;'~:THENCE NORTHi~ ~. 12'44'34" WEST, 78.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH ~0~5~,~9. EAST/'2~5.$2 FEET;~?/ THENCE NORTH 88'14'I7" EAST, 8~.18 FEET; THENCE.~ORTH 01~.$,25. EAST,.?.. 31.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'54'56" EAST~ 26~.$7 FEET; ~?THENCE NORTH .'. 00'25'~3' EAST ', 177.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH ~5~1'05~ EAST, 1,~60,15<' FEETi; THENCE NORTH 34'24'$8' WEST, ~7.~4 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE!~'~ OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVINg' A RADIUS OF 558.80 FEET;? THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~5~18'S~; THENCE NORTH' EAST, 191.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'06'05' EAST, 614.~9 FEET; THENCEi NORTH 00'55'$$' EAST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09'45~1S' EAST,"., 137.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16'27'$9" EAST, 1',~28..20 FEET) THENCE NORTH 50'$6'15' WEST,. 385.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'~4'17" EAST, 252.14 FEET~ TO THE POINT OF .. INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 22 BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ~ONTAININ~ 527.2~ ACRES MORE OR LESS. LESS AND EXCEPTING THER~ FROM COMMERCIAL TRACT A'NORTH '"' A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 22, 25, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOLLOW$~ .. 26 AND 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, MORE PARTICULARLY :. '~.j~.'.. . . ....:-+: i - . · .... ,-. ;, ....~. __BEGIN AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF ~T~E RESERVE P.U.D." AS DESCRIBED:J:"'~/ RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O,R, BOOK 442 PAGES 667 THROUGH:.~672 PUBLIC'RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF'SAID SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89'45'$S" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION"22 A DISTANCE OF 984.93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION. 22; ..... THENC~ NORTH 89'36'11" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID STCTION ~3, A DISTANCE 95..78 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY'LINE OF A FL6RiDA POWER "AND LIGHT COMPANY RIG~T-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 9~"t~AGE 504' PUBLICJ RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00~00'~1" WES.T ALONG~SAIDJ .WESTERLY LINE OF~THE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMP~Ny.:'-'R~OH~,OF.WAY..~%.'.=. · , ...~AN~ ALSO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT' RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 120, PAGE 199 T~ROUGH 201,.PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 8,216.15 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION.WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE - 95 iNTERChANGE PARCEL's'AS DELINEATED BY A DESCRIPTION AND MAP OF SURVEY OF THE I~95 INTERCHANGE -."PRI:M'~ VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID W. ' BETHAM, P.L~S.," WITH ' FLORIDA CERTIFICATION N0..3199 WITH THE ST. LU¢IE WEST THOMAS J..'WHZTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , DATED JANUARY $0, 1989, ·'WITH THE FILE N0~'"'95-~ T~ROUGH- CONSISTING OF THREE PAGES, WITH LAST· REVISIONS ON 2-9-89; SAID POINT':.!;'OF INTERSECTION BEING A POINT ON A CURVE OONCAVED TO THE NORTHWEST TO WHIC~:!'A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 47~44'14. EAST, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.SO FEET, THENCE SOOTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 175.42 F. EET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16~44'14,;. THENCE SOUTH 59~O0'O0.'WEST, 462.6'8 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH A RADIUS oF FEET, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY'ALONG 'A C OF SAID. CURVE ^ DZST NC O{ 2~3,·68 FEET, THROUGH a CENTRAL ANOLEOF 2f 32 45.~ THE:HOE :NORTH .31..44!:361 WEST, ~16.67 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION. WITH T~ EASTERLyr RIGHT OF~-WAY LINE:'OF A PROPOSED 80,00 FoOT INGRESS A~D EGRESS.. ~AS~n~NT' :HEREON "AFTER REFERRED TO AS THE PROPOSED .LEGENDS.DRivE EXTENSION) ~HENcE'""S:OUTHWESTERLy ~ I , , ' i '~ ~i / AFORESAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING A PO~T'ON"A'""CUR~E'¢ONCAVE TO'?"':'"!: THE NORTHWEST AND TO WHICH A'RADIAL. LINE BEARS SOUT~ 11'~2~16,tEA~T~ '~ SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 906.~9,FEETI.~ENOE THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE DF Z~4.96 FEET, T~ROUGH,A AN~LE OF 07"53'49" I "THENCE SOUTH S$~21,$~, WEST,. 4~4'~ FEET TO ~ POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE ~OUT~EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 735.00 FEET; -THENCE SOUThWESTerLy ALON~ THE ARC OF CURVE A DISTANCE OF 249.49 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE I9,'26'$$") · THENCE SDUTH ~6~54'$9. WF%ST,' 40~.25 FEET TO A CURVATURE 'OF. A CUR~E CONCAVE TO THE NbRTHWEST,' HAVIN~ A'-RADIUS · THENCE SOUTH 52 04 SS, WEST, Z28,0! F~ET.To.A POINT. OF~:~ATURE'OF'.Ai:~$? CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,,~A. VX~a. A .T THE NORTHERLY. R~GHT'OF~ '" '"' '" -'. " "-~"' . ....... · , . WAY: ~ZN~ OF;. TH~' PROPO~D'~"~ BOULEVA , ..., ..... /,. . ,,:..RESERVE ~.~ RD EXTENSION; , ~: , . ...... · ......... .~.,:,,~, ~.~ THENCE, DEP. ARTZNG SAID EASTER~ RZ~?OF~A2' ~NE O~-~A~' '"':'~."-j'";:'.;';-J' i"R SE VE OU EVARD' EXTENSION THE FO . OWZN N O T I C E NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commis- sioners in and for St. Lucie County, Florida, will at 1:30 P.M. on Tuesday, May 23, 1989, in St. Lucie County Commission Chambers, third floor of County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida hold a public hearing on: Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Agent: Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED'LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road) All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at this time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter con- sidered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Dated this 1st day of May, 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /s/ Judy Culpepper, Chairman PUBLISH: MAY 3, 1989 LESS AND EXCEPTING THERE FROM COMMERCIAL TRACT A-NORTH A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 11, 25, RANGE $9 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOLLOWSI '- 26 AND 27, TOWNSHIP $6 SOUTH, BEGIN AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF "THE RESERVE P.U.D.' AS DESCRIBE'D<'~;IN RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 442 PAGES 667 THROUGH<.'6?2 PUBLIC' RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA', LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89~45'$$" EAST, ALON~ SAID NORTH LINE OF SEOTION"22, A DISTANCE OF 984,93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22;~"".THENCE NORTH 89'36'11' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF 95..78 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF A FLORIDA ~POWER "AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT'OF'WAY, AS RECORDED IN O,R, BOOK 9~"t~AGE 504' PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE souTH 00'00'11" WES~ ALONG~SAID WESTERLY LINE OF:~THE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMP~NY.:'"RiOH~'OF'WAY'"?~'~N ALSO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY"~'RIG~T-OF-WAY':'> A'S RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 120, PAGE ~99 THROUGH 101,.PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU~IE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 8,116.1~ FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION.WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE'INTERStATE - 95 INTERCHANGE PARCEL-'~'AS DELINEATED BY A DESCRIPTION AND MAP OF SURVEy OF THE I'-95 INTERCHANGE '- PRIM~ VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID W, BETHAM, P,L~S., WITH FLORIDA CERTIFICATION N0..3199 WITH THE ST, LUC.IE WEST THOMAS J..'WHITE' DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , DATED JANUARY $0, 1989, "WITH THE FILE NO,'<'"95-! THROUGH.' CONSISTING OF THREE PAGES, WITH LAST'REVISIONS ON 2-9-89; SAID INTERSECTiION BEING A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVED TO THE NORTHWEST TO RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 47~44'14' EAST, SAID' CURVE HAVING A RADI:US OF FEET, THENCE SOOTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 17S,42 F. EET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16'44'14.~.;.THENCE SOUTH SP~OO'OO"'WEST, 462,618 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH A RA6IUS OF 611,42 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALON~ THE'ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 233.'68 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2f~$2'4S'; THENCE NORTH .$1.~44~.$~ WEST~ 116.67 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION'WITH T~f EASTERL~r'RIGHT-OF~'WAY LINE' 'OF A PROPOSED $0.00 FOOT INGRESS AND EGRESS.. ~ASEzENT :~EREON "AFTER. REFERRED TO AS THE PROPOSED "LEGENDS.DRIVE ." EXTENSION; ~HENCE'"'SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE EA~TKRLY RIGHT-OF'WAy LINE OF SAID.*LEGENDS DRIVE'. THE FOLLOWIN~ COURSES AND D'ISTANCES~ AFORESAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING A POINT ON A'cURVE'CONCAVE TO'][~{~ THE NORTHWEST AND TO WHICH A'RAD/AL. LINE BEARS SOUTH 1I'SI'I~".EA§T,'!i<]/~'; SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 906.~9~FEET;.~HENCE SOUTHWESTERLY.ALONG~?~.... THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 1~4.96 FEET, THROUGH"A"/CENTRALi? ANGLE OF 07"$3'49' ; "THENCE SOUTH 86~21'$~" WEST~ 474'~5 FEET TO~ A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONOAVE TO THE ~OUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 735.00 FEET; ,THENCE SOUTHWESTerLy ALONG THE ARC OF 'SA'ID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 249,49 FEET, THROUGH A 'CENTRAL ANGLE ..OF~.~. I9J26'$$') THENCE SOUTH ~6~54'~9. W~ST,' 40~.25 FEET TO A CURVATURE 'OF. A CUR~E CONCAVE TO THE N~RTNWEST,' HAVING A' RADIUS .OF 611.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 'ALON~.'THE ARb OF SAiD CURVE DISTANCE 0F.272.$7. FEET, .THROUGH A CENTRAL~ANGLE OF 15~1'$0".T0 POINT OF'REVERSE CURVATURE OF A' C~RVE"CONC~V~ TO'T~E"~OO%~AST"HAVIN'~:;i!i~,.?' A RADiIUS 0F'S12,04 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC. OF :~AI~"~!~% CURVEiCONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, AV N. ..A SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF'~AiD 'dURVE 'A DISTANCE O'~'~O'i'!<~FE~?~L?~{~ THROUGH. A CENTRAL. ANGLE OF 01" 09' 14'",'T0 T~ ~O~NT' ' 0~-?~''.~ .~,.' ~NTERSECTION' .......... ~{? :~'?' WI.TH NORTHERLY,. RIGHT-OF, WAY,... OF;. THE':[ BOULEVARD' EXTENSION; ~'~' ' '::' ' ?," .'.?~' ..... -,~"-.~?~'~.~,~"~.':'..,~':{~ !HENCE, DiEP.ARTING SAID EASTERL~ RIGHT?OF~WA¥' L~N~ 'DRIVE", ~O_R=~J~_~TEJ~j~. , ALbNG SAID NORTheRLY. RI~HT-OF-WAY . LINE OF' T~E'~'.PROPOS,~~';" "RESERVE BiOULEVARD EXTENSION THE FOLLOWING COURSES.AND 'DISTANCES)."-.~/~L ~%~s~-~. .... CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST: AV NG a RADIUS 899, 7/FEET; NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OFiSAID CURVE A DISTANCE 0F.!~254~83 FEET,~. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16%X4'04'; THENCE NORTH 18~4'52' WEST,. 784.39 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST WITH A RADIUS OF 1000,00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 586.18 FEET, 'THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF...~ 33'35'08".; THENCE NORTH 15'20'16' EAST 454.07 FEET TO A POINT ' CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF.?~!!!<'', 1,424.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY '"ALONG THE ARC'OF' SAID .9S1.23 FEET,' THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~8'16'24'; '.THENCE NORTH~'' 22'$6'08" WEST, 732.22' FEET TO A POIN~ OF CURVATURE'OF A CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVINO A RADIUS OF 2,650.O0'FEET~ THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF ~,168.22 ' FEET,, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25'15'29'; THENCE.N~RTH 48~11'$7'~ 'WEST, 270.27 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE cONCAVE.TO THE.'~... SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4,150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY:' ' ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 18.74' FEET;<. THROUGH" A.:'.'. CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'~5'~1', TO'A POINT ON'THE WESTERLY~'RIGHT~OF-WAy'. LINE OF RESERVE BLVD INGRESS AND EGRESS. EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN O.R~ BOOK 448 PAGE ..2468, PUBLIC RE~ORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY,.FLORIDA; 'ii:' ?HENCE DEPARTING SAID ' " ' ...... PROPOSED NORTH RIGHT'OF-WAY L~NE CONTINUE NORTHWESTERL~ ALONG THE ARC OF SA~D CURVE AND THE NORTH RIGNT'OF-WAY LINE OF SAID INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT REFERRED TO AS 'RESERVE BOULEVARD', A. DISTANCE OF 228.62! FEET, THROUOH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0~09'23' TO A 'POINT ON THE .EASTERLY PERIMETER OF AFORESAID 'RESERVE P.U..D.'~ BEING A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO' THE SOUTHEAST. TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH'51~OO'lS':WEST, SAI!D CURVE~ HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY PERIMETER THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES; .. ' ..... -. NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE A 'DISTANCE' OF 0.88 FFET' THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01~00'$7', TO A POINT. OF COMPOUND: CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF' -' 553.97 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 'ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE · A'- DISTANCE OF 474.06 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49~01'5~') THENCE'? '" NORTH 89'26'3~' EAST, .94~.4~ FEET; ' THENCE SOUTH 47.~07'11' ~10.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54'0~'26" EAST, ~50,~6 FEET;<'.THENCE NORTH..'~ ~' 12~44'34" WEST, 78.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH ~0(~'$~' 'EAST/'2~5.$2 THENCE NORTH 80~14'17" EAST, 80~18 FEET; THENCE.NORTH 01~.3'20" EAST,':"' 31.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88~54'~6' EAST~ 265.$7 FEET; <~THENCE NORTH. 00~20'33' EAST ', ~77.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH $5~1'05~ EAST, 1,360.15'-... FEET; THENCE NORTH $4'24'38' WEST, 57..34 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE!ii " OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVlNG.A RADIUS OF 558.80 FEET;?" :"' THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE .OF FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF $5~18'$~'; THENCE NORTH 00~53'55': EAST, 191.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89~06'05' EAST, 6141~9 FEET~ NORTH 00'53'55' EAST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09'45'25" EAST," .. ~37.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16'27'39' EAST, 1',128.,20 FEET) THENCE NORTH 50'$6'i$" WEST,. 385.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'~4'17" EAST, 252.14 FEET~ .. TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 22 BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ~ONTAININ~ 527.2~ ACRES MORE OR LESS. . TO: MEMORANDUM Assistant County Administrator FROM: Development Director DATE: April 26, 1989 SUBJECT: Request for Hearing Date Please place on the agenda for Tuesday, May 2, 1989, a for permission to advertise the following petitions for on the date set forth: .. BCC HEARING DATE: MAY 23. 1989 e Se request hearing Petition of Cleo Stern (Trustee), for a change in zoning from AG (Agricultural) to CG (Commercial, General) and IL (Industrial, Light). Petition of Richard Long, by Agent: Mark Benton, Conditional Use Permit to operate a package store retail sale of liquor in a CG (Commercial, General) District. for a for the Zoning Petition of Agri-Bin, Inc., by Agent: Tom McFrederick, for a Conditional Use Permit to authorize t~ manufacture of wood products (wood boxes) in an IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District. ' Petition of American Financial Life Insurance Co., by Agent: Genevieve L. Jackson, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to RS-2 (Residential Single Family - 2 du/ac). ' Petition of Sid and Monica Nathanson for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac). Petition of United Land Ventures, Inc. for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac). Petition of Elizabeth J. Walker, by Agent: James K. Jones, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac). Petition of STS Properties, by Agent: Robert V. Schwerer, Esquire, to amend the Future Land Use Maps of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan from RL (Low Density Residential Development) to CG (General Commercial Development). Petition of STS Properties, by Agent: Robert V. Schwerer, Esquire, for a change in zoning from RM-5 (Residential, Multiple Family - 5 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General). 10. Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CG (Commercial, General). 11. Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to CT (Commercial, Tourist). 12. Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) - The Reserve, Section II. 13. Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner & Associates, for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) -. The Reserve, Section III. 14. Petition of Mick Satur (Ft. Pieroe Business Park) for a change in zoning from IH (Industrial, Heavy) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development). cc: County Administrator Agenda Item: File Number: ~ 14 RZ-89-016 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Commission Land Development Manager April 24, 1989 Petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner & Associates, for a Change in Zoning from AR-1 (Agriculture, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD Planned Unit Development) - The Reserve Section II. LOCATI ON: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: S URROUNDI NG Z ONI NG: SURROUNDING LAND USES: FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: WATER/SEWER SERVICE: Southeast side of Glades Cutoff Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road. AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac), and PUD (Planned Unit Development) PUD (Planned Unit Development) RL (Residential, Low Density - 5 du/ac) 527.23 Acres To achieve unified zoning for The Reserve, a mixed use residential development at a gross density of approximately 2 du/ac. AR-l, RS-2 and PUD The section is currently surrounded by undeveloped land, except for the 1-95, Prima Vista interchange to the east. Station ~3 (Prima Vista) is located 3 1/2 miles to the east. On site sewer and water facilities to be provided. April 24, 1989 Page 2 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89-016 STANDARDS FOR REVIEW: In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of this Ordinance; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the spirit and intent of the St. Lucie County Ordinance, PUD (Planned Unit Development) ~.zoning district regulations, if subject to the conditions as cited below. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, if subject to the conditions as cited below. Whether and the extent to which the. proposed amendment is inconsistent with existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning is compatible with the proposed uses in the area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment w.ould..result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, and emergency medical facilities; (See Comments) April 24, 1989 Page 3 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89-0t6 Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts upon the environment. (See Comments) Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern, specifically identifying any negative effects on such pattern; The proposed amendment is compatible with the development policies of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, if subject to the conditions as cited below. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and interest of this Ordinance; The '~oposed amendment is consistent with the public interest and~ the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, if subjec~ to the conditions as cited below. COMMENTS In December of 1988, this Board held a public hearing on the proposed Development Order for The Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact. Before you now is the application for Preliminary Planned Unit. Development approval for the subsection of The Reserve known as The Reserve - Section II. This Section is essentially that area lying north of Reserve Boulevard, not previously included with The Reserve PUD - Section I. Attached you will find a copy of the preliminary development plan for this project. As with all PUD' s the application before you is for preliminary approvals only. Preliminary approval does not constitute authorization for the developers to commence any construction in any area that requires further approval from St. Lucie County or any other lawfully charged authority. Final Plan April 24, 1989 Page 4 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89-016 approval documents are to be submitted and reviewed in accordance with the provisions as outlined in Section 3. 2. 121, St. Lucie County Zoning Ordi'nance. In reviewing the preliminary development plans for this Section, County staff has determined it to be generally compliant with all minimum requirements, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval. THE RESERVE SECTION II SPECIAL CONDI TI ONS ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ST. LUC] E COUNTY RESOLUTI ON 89- 73, THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT KNOWN AS THE RESERVE, ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AND SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH, AS REQUIRED THEREIN. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATIONS FOR ANY ACTIVITY WITHIN THE AREA DESCRIBED AS THE RESERVE - SECTION II, INCLUDING ROAD, GOLF COURSE AND DRAINAGE NETWORK CONSTRUCTION, FINAL APPROVAL FOR THOSE AREAS IN WHICH THE ACTIVITY IS PROPOSED MUST BE SECURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3. 2. 121, ST. LUCIE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. EACH APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL MUST INCLUDE A DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBPARCEL, INCLUDING ALL THE ENGINEERING AND ARCHI TECTURAL I NFORMATI ON. EACH APPLICATION FOR FINAL PARCEL APPROVAL MUST BE ACCOMPAN¥IED BY THE REQUIRED APPLICATION FEE OF $600, WHICH IS USED TO DEFRAY THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT REVIEWS AND PUBLIC HEARING PROCESSING. THIS APPLICATION FEE MAY BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARD FEE SCHEDULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, WITHOUT AMENDING ACTION TO THIS RESOLUTION. April 24, 1989 Page 5 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89-016 ALL ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN SECTION II, INCLUSIVE OF ANY SUBPARCEL, MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WI TH MINIMUM COUNTY STANDARDS UNLESS SUPERSEDED BY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, OR WHERE PERMITTED OTHERWISE ALTERED THROUGH OFFICIAL ACTION OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, DURING THE FINAL PLAN REVIEW STAGE. GOLF CART CROSSINGS ON LEGENDS DRIVE MAY BE AT NORMAL GRADE, PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS ARE MET: so ALL REQUIRED SAFETY SIGNAGE IS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND FDOT REGULATIONS; ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS; ILLUMINATED WARNING DEVICES SHALL BE REQUI RED TO I D ENTI FY THE CROS SI NG SITE(S). THESE DEVICES MAY BE PLACED ON A TI MING DEVICE SO THAT THEY WOULD ONLY OPERATE DURING THE HOURS ~F GOLF COURSE OPERATION BUT MUST BE OPERATIONAL SEVEN DAYS A WEEK, ALL YEAR LONG. o - UNLESS OTHERWI SE AMENDED, THE FOLLOWING MINI MUM LOT REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY TO ALL RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE APPLICABLE PARCEL: PARCELS 17, 22, 23 - EQUIVALENT TO THE STANDARD & 24 REGULATIONS OF THE RS-4 ZONING DISTRICT; PARCELS 14 THRU 16 - EQUIVALENT TO THE STANDARD & 18 THRU 21 REGULATIONS OF THE RM-5 ZONING DISTRICT. ZERO LOT LINE PERMITABLE, BUILDING SPACING TO BE USED FOR ALL MULTI-STORY/ MULTI-FAMILY STRUCTURES. April 24, 1989 Page 6 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89-016 ZERO LOT LINE STANDARDS (MINIMUM) LOT AREA 4, 000 S. F. ROAD FRONTAGE 20 FEET LOT WIDTH 50 FEET BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET BUILDING COVERAGE 50 % Although not reflected in any of the recommended conditions of approval, it should be noted that in accordance with the direction of the Board of County Commissioners, the approval for the roadway design alignment at the intersection of Reserve Boulevard/Prima Vista Boulevard has been deferred to the Florida Department of Transportation. Though the Department has given a "conceptual" approval to the present schematic arrangement of this alignmentj they point out that there remains so.me concern about the westerly approaches accessing this interchange. Most specifically there remains the unresolved question of compliance with the 1984 Interchange justification report for 1-95 and Prima Vista Boulevard, and the statements contained therein assuring a complete public assess route from Glades Cut-off Road to 1-95. These concerns were again conveyed'to project engineers in copies of correspondence received in my office as recently as April 20, 1989. ' Noting the above comments and conditions, Staff would recommend that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. If you have any questions, please let us know. DJM/la RES-IIa(RMS-REZ) cc: County Administrator County Attorney County Engineer Fire Marshal Regina Karner Daniel M. Cary AGENDA - PLANq~ING AND ZONING COMMISSION Petition of Associates, for THIJRSDAY APRIL 27, 1989 7:00 P.M. Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Karner & a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road) Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person de- cides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any'matter considered at such meeting or hearin~_.b~, will need a.record of theproceedings, and--that,. for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim ~record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying, during a hearing 'will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying~ during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners April 4, 1989. Legal notice was published in the News Tribune, a newspape~ of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on April 5, 1989. FILE NO. RZ-89-016 ,THENCE. NORTH 34'28'56' WEST, ?7.4~'"~EET'" ' 'TO A POINT OF.'.CURVATURE OF A ~URVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST~AVING A RADIUS OF 899,37~FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF~SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF':254.S3 FEET,'.' THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16~4'04.; THENCE NORTH 18~'i4'52. WEST, 784.39 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST WIIH A RADIUS OF I000.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 586.18 FEET, 'THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF. _ 33'35'08"; THENCE NORTH 15~20'16" EAST 4S4.07 FEET TO A' POINT OF-.~ CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,424.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY'.'ALONG THE ARC'OF, SAID _95!.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ~B'16'~4"; 'THENCE NORTH~'- 22'56'08' WEST, 732,22' FEET TO A PO!N~ OF CURVATURE- OF A CURVE- CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS O~ ~,6$O.O0'FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF FEET,. THROUGH A CENTRAL AN~LE OF 25'15'29"; THENCE'~ORTN 4B'il'3y.~ 'WEST, 2?0.2? FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE 6F A CURVE CONCAVE.TO SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4,~$0o00 FEET; THENCE NORT~WESTERLY~' ' ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 1B.74' FEE~,'. THROUgh" A,~'.. CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00~15'~1', TOgA p .... ~ ~, ~., ,--, ..... - BOOK 448 ·PAGE ..2468,- PUBLIC REaORD£ ~F S~ '"''" X^X33X~"-Y~-~I?~': ..... ~HENCE DEPARTING .SAID' PROPOSED NORTH RIOHT-OF-WAY LINg CONTI~U~''~ORTHW~ESTERL2 ~LONG THEARC.OF ~A~D CURVE AND THE NORTH RIOHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID INGRESS. ~ND EGRESS EASEMENT REFERRED TO AS 'R~S~RV~ BOULEVARD", k DISTANCE OF 228.62. ~EET, THROUOH A CENTRAL ANOLE OF O~ 09 2~' TO A 'POINT ON THE .EASTERLYi ~ERIHETER OF AFORESAID 'RESERVE P.~,.D.'~ BEINO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO ~HE SOUTHEAST-TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH'$1:%00,1S~ WEST, SAID U ~AVING A RAD~US~OF ~o..o~ THE ~. . c RYE: ~HE FOLLOWINO COU~ES :~2; 2t~_NORTHEABTERbY.ALONO BA/DEASTERLY PERIMETER ~ NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE A DISTANCE' OF 0.88 FZET' i THROUG~ A CENTRAL ANOLE OF 01~00'37·, TO A POINT.'.OF COMPOUND: CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS 353.9? FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLy 'ALONO TEE ARC 6F SAID CURVE .0 DISTANCE OF 474.06 FEET TNROUO~ A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49'01'$1'{ THENCE'~ - ~? , · OS 26 EAST, S$0.~6 FEET;'~TEENCE NORT~.-~' ;'.~.~_34 WEST, 7S.26 FEET, THENCE NORTH 301S3'3g" ~AS~-:235.32 ~EST~:~?-' ~c~ NORTH 88~14'i7· EAST, 80,18 FEET~ THENCE-~ORTH 0~3,25,' EAST/ .... . 31.70 FiEET~: THENCE SOUTH 88~54,56. EA~T~ . 26S,~7 FEET '~ NORTH' '. - : a~ s:4 24 38 WEST, S?.34 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE!? -: OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING.A RADIUS OF 5S8.80 FEET;'/.- THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONO THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 344.~7]. FEET THROUOH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35~18,33.; THENCE NORTH' ~0~$3,S5,i EAST, 191,70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'06'05' EAST, 614~9 FEET; THENCE: NORTH 00'53'55' ' EAST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09'45'25' EAST, 137.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH I6'27'~9' EAST, 1,128.20 FEET} THENCE NORTH $0'56'i$' WEST, 385.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'14'17' EAST, 252.14 FEET~. TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID NORTH LINE OF SAI~ SECTION 22 BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTA~ ~Nu 527.2~ ACRES MORE OR LESS. LESS AND EXCEPTING THERE FROM COMMERCIAL TRACT A-NORTH }A PARCEL OF LA~D LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 22~' 23, 26 AND 27,'TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUOIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED~ AS ZOLLOWS, . ' l.:-i.' ': '"'!'3 BEGIN AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF 'THE RESERVE P.U.D.' AS DESCRIBED" I~ RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 442 PAGES 667 THROUGH -672 PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA', LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAIE SECTION 22.; THENCE SOUTH 89~45'$3' EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION'22, A DISTANCE OF 984.93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22;~".THENC~ NORTH 89'$6'I1' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 95.78 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY'LINE OF A FLOR/DA POWER '-AND iLIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O,R. BOOK 9g":'PAOE 504' PUBLIC iRECORDS OF ST. LUClE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00~00'~1" WES-T ALONG~SAID WESTERLY LINE OFf--THE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT ~OMP~N~.:'RI~T~-OF-WAY;e~AND ~ALSO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY~:'RIGHT-OF-WAY !RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 120, PAGE 199 THROUGH 201,.PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU~IE .COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 8,216.1~ FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION,WITH 'T~E ~ESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE - 9~ INTERCHANGE PAReEL DELINEATED BY A DESCR'IPTION"AND MAP OF SURVEY OF THE I~90 INTERCHANGE ."PRIMA VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID-W. ' BETHAM, ' P.L~S.,% W/TH "FLORIDA CERTIFICATION N0..3199 WITH THE ST.' LUCIE WEST THOMAS J..'WHITE DEVELOPMEN~ CORPORATION , DATED JANUARY 3~0, 1989, "WITH THE FILE NO,~'' 95-1 THROUGH.- CONSISTING O.F THREE PAGES, WITH LAST'REVISIOnS ON 2-9-89; SAID POX'NT INTERSECTION BEING A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVED TO THE NORTHWEST TO RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 47'44'14" EAST, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF FEET, THENCE SOOTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF S~XD CURVE A DISTANCE OF 175.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16'44~14~.T~EN~E SOUTH $9100~O0''WEST, 462.68 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH A RADIUS OF 621.42 FEET; THENCE SOUT~WESTERLY'ALON~ T~E AR~ OF SAID, CURVE A DISTANCE 233.68 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL AN~LE OF 2f~2~4S'; THENCE NORTH WEST, 116.67 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERS~CTION'WIT~ THk EASTERLY ~'RI~HT-OF£'~A¥ LINE:'OF A ~PROPOSED 80.00 FOOT INGRESS AND E~RES$~' ~ASE'm.ENT :~EREON "AFTER REFERi~ED TO AS THE PROPOSED 'LEgENDS,DRIVE ? EXTENS.XON~ ~NENC~"SOUTHW~STERLY ALONO THE EASTERLY RIONT-OF-WAY LX~'OF SAID.*LEOENDS DRIVE'..THE FOLLOWINO COURSES AND DISTANCES~ · . - AFORESAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEIN~'A ~Oi~T'O~"~"%UR~R'CONOAVE THE NORTHWEST AND TO. WHICH A'RADIAL LINE BEARS sOuTH SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 906.SP'%FEET;.~HEN~E THE ARC OF,SAID CURVE A DISTANCE ~F %!4,96 FEET, ANGLE OF 07'$3'49' ; 'THENCE SOUTH S6~11'$S~ WEST, 474'~$5 FEET TO: POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CON~AVE TO THE ~OUT~EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 735.00 FEET; .THENCE SOUTHWESTErLy ALON~ THE ARC OF 'SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 249,49 FEET, - THROUGH A 'CENTRAL ANGLE .OF~.~. - !93 26'55") - THENCE SOUTH ~6'54'S9, ~F~T,' 405,25 FEET TO.A CURVATURE 'OH. ~ OUR~E CONCAVE TO TH~ N~RTHWEST,' HAPIN~ A'. RADIUS .OF 611.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 'ALONG.'TME AR~ OF SAID CURVE DISTANCE 0F-272,57-FEET, '-.THRO, UGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2~'31'30'.T0 POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE CON~AV~ TO T~E SOUTH'EAST A RADIUS 0F'812.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALON~ THE-ARC. OF :SAI~"~ CURVE A DISTANCE OF $71.91"FEET THROUGH K'O~N'TRAL~.A~GL~::'OF ~E SgUTH 52'04'59' WEST, I28,0! ~EET.TO.A POINT. O~Fd~R~ATORE' OF'A~ CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,:HAVlNg-A SQUT~ESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID dURVE 'A DiSTAnCE 'WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF, WAY". ~INE OFT.THEI BOULEVARD' EXTENSION~ ,'?' , ' .4, "'?"':'":~'"~..:)~L.:' l, DRIVE', ~O.R%.H~I~ ALONG SAID ~Olt~RnY ~?-O~-~AY.5~N~ O~ 'RESERVE BOULEVARD' EXTENSION THE FOLLOWING CDgR~B.AND.9igTANO~$;-.-3.<, ~.~......~ CURRENT ZONING PUD - RED AR-1 - BLUE RS-2 - GREEN 22, 23, 26, 27-36-39 PETITION OF C~LAWAY LAND & CAI-[LE CO., INC. BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER~P.L.S. FOR A CHANGEIN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AR-1 & PUDiTO PUD - FUTURE OF CALLAWAy LAND& CAl-II_E. CO. ~ INC.'"' BY AGENT: . REGINA KARNER, P,L.S. FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AR-1 & PUD TO PUD Agenda Item: File Number: $ 14 RZ-89-016 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Commission Land Development Manager April 24, 1989 Petition of Callaway Land and Cattle Co., by Agent: Karner & Assooiates, for a Change in Zoning from AR-1 (Agriculture, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD Planned Unit Development) - The Reserve Section II. LOCATI ON.: EXI STING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: PARCEL SI ZE: PROPOSED USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USES: FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: WATER/SEWER SERVICE: Southeast side of Glades Cutoff Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road. AR-1 (Agricultural, du/ac), and PUD Devel opme nt ) Residential - 1 (Planned Unit PUD (Planned Unit Development) RL (Residential, Low Density - 5 du/ac) 527.23 Acres TO achieve unified zoning for The Reserve, a mixed use residential development at a gross density of approximately 2 du/ac. AR-i, RS-2 and PUD The section is currently surrounded by undeveloped land, except for the 1-95, Prima Vista interchange to the east. Station $3 (Prima Vista) is located 3 1/2 miles to the east. On site sewer and water facilities to be provided. April 24, 1989 Page 2 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89-016 STANDARDS FOR REVIEW: In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of this Ordinance; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the spirit and intent of the St. Lucie County Ordinance, PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning district regulations, if subject to the conditions as cited below. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, if subject to the conditions as cited below. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is inconsistent with existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning is compatible with the proposed uses in the area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, and emergency medical facilities; (See Comments) April 24, 1989 Page 3 Petitlo : Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89-016 Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts upon the environment. (See Comments) Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern, specifically identifying any negative effects on such pattern; The proposed amendment is compatible with the development policies of the St. Lucie County GroWth Management Policy Plan, if subject to the conditions as cited below. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and interest of this Ordinance; The proposed amendment is consistent with the public interest and the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, if subject to the conditions as cited below. In December of 1988, this Board held a public hearing on the proposed Development Order for The Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact. Before you now is the application for Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the subsection of The Reserve known as The ReServe - Section II. This Section is essentially that area lying north of Reserve Boulevard, not previously included with The Reserve PUD - Section I. Attached you will find a copy of the preliminary development plan for this Project. As with all PUD' s the application before you is for preliminary approvals only. Preliminary approval does not constitute authorization for the developers to commence any construction in any area that requires further approval from St. Lucie County or any other lawfully charged authority. Final Plan April 24, 1989 Page 4 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No~: RZ-89-016 approVal documents are to be submitted and reviewed in accordance with the provisions as outlined in Section 3. 2. 12t, St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance. In reviewing the preliminary development plans for this Section, County staff has determined it to be generally compliant with all minimum requirements, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval. THE RESERVE SECTION II SPECIAL CONDITIONS ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY RESOLUTION 89-73, THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT KNOWN AS THE RESERVE, ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AND SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH, AS REQUIRED THEREIN. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATIONS FOR ANY ACTIVITY WITHIN THE AREA DESCRIBED AS THE RESERVE - SECTION II, INCLUDING ROAD, GOLF COURSE AND DRAINAGE NETWORK CONSTRUCTION, FINAL APPROVAL FOR THOSE AREAS IN WHICH THE ACTIVITY IS PROPOSED MUST BE SECURED IN ACCORDANCE WI TH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3. 2. 121, ST. LUCIE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. EACH APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL MUST INCLUDE A DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBPARCEL, INCLUDING ALL THE ENGINEERING AND ARCHI TECTURAL I NFORMATI ON. EACH APPLICATION FOR FINAL PARCEL APPROVAL MUST BE ACCOMPANYIED BY THE REQUIRED APPLICATION FEE OF $600, WHICH IS USED TO DEFRAY THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT REVIEWS AND PUBLIC HEARING PROCESSING. THIS APPLICATION FEE MAY BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARD FEE SCHEDULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, WITHOUT AMENDING ACTION TO THIS RESOLUTION. April 24, 1989 Page 5 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89-016 ALL ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN SECTION II, INCLUSIVE OF ANY SUBPARCEL, MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WI TH MINIMUM COUNTY STANDARDS UNLESS SUPERSEDED BY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, OR WHERE PERMITTED OTHERWISE ALTERED THROUGH OFFICIAL ACTION OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, DURING THE FINAL PLAN REVIEW STAGE. GOLF CART CROSSINGS ON LEGENDS DRIVE MAY BE AT NORMAL GRADE, PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS ARE MET: ALL REQUIRED SAFETY SI GNAGE IS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND FDOT REGULATIONS; ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS; ILLUMINATED WARNING DEVICES SHALL BE REQUI RED TO I DENTI FY THE CROS SI NG SITE(S). THESE DEVICES MAY BE PLACED ON A TI MING DEVICE SO THAT THEY WOULD ONLY OPERATE DURING THE HOURS OF GOLF COURSE OPERATION BUT MUST BE OPERATIONAL SEVEN DAYS A WEEK, ALL YEAR LONG. UNLESS OTHERWISE AMENDED, THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY TO ALL RESI DENTI AL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE APPLICABLE PARCEL: PARCELS 17, 22, 23 - EQUIVALENT TO THE STANDARD & 24 REGULATIONS OF THE RS-4 ZONING DI STRICT; PARCELS 14 THRU 16 - EQUIVALENT TO THE STANDARD & 18 THRU 21 REGULATIONS OF THE RM-5 ZONING DI STRICT. ZERO LOT LINE PERMITABLE, BUILDING SPACING TO BE USED FOR ALL MULTI-STORY/ MULTI-FAMILY STRUCTURES. April 24, 1989 Page 6 Petition: Callaway Land and Cattle Co. File No.: RZ-89-016 ZERO LOT LINE STANDARDS (MINIMUM) LOT AREA 4,000 S.F. ROAD FRONTAGE 20 FEET LOT WIDTH 50 FEET BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET BUILDING COVERAGE 50 % Although not reflected in any of the recommended conditions of approval, it should be noted that in accordance with the direction of the Board of County Commissioners, the approval for the roadway design alignment at the intersection of Reserve Boulevard/Prima Vista Boulevard has been deferred to the Florida Department of Transportation. Though the Department has given a "conceptual" approval to the present schematic arrangement of this alignment, they point out that there remains some concern about the westerly approaches accessing this interchange. Most specifically there remains the unresolved question of compliance with the 1984 Interchange justification report for 1-95 and Prima Vista Boulevard, and the statements contained therein assuring a complete public assess route from Glades Cut-off Road to 1-95. These concerns were again conveyed' to project engineers in copies of correspondence received in my office as recently as April 20 1989. ' Noting the above comments and conditions, Staff would recommend that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. If you have any questions, please let us know. DJM/la RES-IIa(RMS-REZ) cc: County Administrator County Attorney County Engineer Fire Marshal Regina Karner Daniel M. Cary AGENDA - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Petition of Associates, for THURSDAY APRIL 27, 1989 ?:00 P.M. Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Karner & a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road) Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person de- cides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners April 4, 1989. Legal notice was published in the News Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on April 5, 1989. FILE NO. RZ-89-016 CURVE CON~AVE TO THE NO . · __ poI~? OF .'CURVATURE OF A · CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16~X4'04.~ THENCE NORTH 18~14~S2. WEST, 784.$9 FEET TO A POInt OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE . NORTHEAST WITH A RADIUS OF 1000~00 FE~T~ THENCE NORTHWESTERL~ ALONG: THE ARC OF SAID CURVE $86.18 FE~T, 'THROUGH A CENTRAL AN~LE 33'35~08"'~ THENCE NORTH 15~20~16" ~AST 454~07 F ' CURVATURE OF A CURVE CO . . EET TO A POINT ~,424,00 EE,: THENCE NORTHWESTERLy'. ALON~ THE ARC'OF.AS ' THROUGH A CENTRAL AN~LE 9F ~8'16'24"~ 'THENCE NORTH'' 22'56'08. WEST, 732.22 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVIN~ A RADIHS OF ~,650.00 FEET~ THENCE · NORTHWESTERLY ALON~ THE ARC ~F SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF ~,168.22 · FEET~. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2~29,; THENCE.~ORTH 48~11,37~: '~EST, 270.27 FEET TO A POINT OF ~URVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE.TO THE.'~...' SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4~150.00 FEET~ THENC~ NORTHWESTERLy. ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURV~ A D~STANCE OF 18~74' F~T;'. THROUgh" A.>. CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00~$,3X.~ TO'A POINT ON THE ~ESTERLY:RIGHT-OF-WAy . BQo~LINE 448 OF RESERVE. pA~ 2468,.BLVD INGRESS PUBLIC AND REE~RESS'~ASEMENTo A~ RE~ORDED iN O.R~! FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ~ ..... .... fi~_~-~V~RD , A. DXSTANCE OF 228,6~ . , ~-~ a ~v~ ON .A CURVE CONOAVE TO I THE SOUTHEAST-TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH'$1~OO~lS,:WEST, SAID CURVE HAVIN~ A RADIUS~OF 50.00; THENC~ NORTHEAST~RS¥ ALON~ ~AID EASTERLY PERIMETER THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND D!STANCE$$ ' .... NORTHEASTERLy ALONG SAID ~URVE A DISTANCe' OF 0.88 F~ET''" THROUGH A CENTRAL AN~LE OF 01~00,87., ~0 A PO~NT.'OF COMPOUND: CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO T~E 80UTMEAST MAVIN~ A RADIUS OF' · 553~97 FEET~ THENCE NORTHEASTERLy 'ALON~ THEARC 6{ SAID CURVE. A·7'~.. DISTANCE OF 474,06 FEET TRROUO~ A CENTRAL ANOLE OF 4 ' NORTH 89'26'$I. EAS~ 948 ~ ~-- .......... 9 01.~ } THENCE"? 110.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH $4'0~'2~" EAST ~' I2~44~34" WEST, 78 26 " ~ , ._ 6 FE~T;':'THENCE NORTH '-. O0 25'33' EAST., 177.17 FEET~ THENCE NORT~ 35~31,05, ~AS - ,"' OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A THENCE NORTHWESTERLy ALONG T~ ARC OF ~ ' FEET ~AD~UZ OF SS8,80 FEETF:~..''' · AID ~URVE A DI~TAN=~ OF THrOUgH A CENTRAL ANSLE OF $~1~.~ THENCE NORTH '00~$$~$$~: EAST, 191.70 FEET~ THENCE SOUTH ~9~06,05, EAST, 6~4~9.FEET~ THENC~ : NORTH 00,53~55. - EAST, 80.00 FEET~ THENCE NORTH 09'45~, EAST,' l~7.IS FEET~ THENCE NORTH 16~27'$9~ EAST, 1',128..20 FEETj THENCE NORTH . 50'56'15" WEST, ~85.49 FEETS T~ENCE NORTH 00~14'17. EAST, 252.14 TO ?.HE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH AFORESAID NORTH LINE OF SAID: SECTION 22 BEING THE POINT OF BEgINNINg. CONTAINING 527.2~ ACRES MORE OR LESS. % PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 22," 23, 26 AND 27,'TOWNSHIP 56 lANCE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED~'AS. FOLLOWS~ . ......~'~... BEGIN AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF 'THE RESERVE P,UoD.' AS DESCRIBED"~"IN RESOLUTION NO. 84-129 AND RECORDED IN O~R. BOOK 442 PAGES 667 THROUGH /6?2 PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA-, LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 89'45'$3, EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION"22, A DISTANCE OF 984.93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTH 89'36'11' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2~, A DISTANCE OF 95 78 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTeRLY-LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER '.AND LIGHT COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN O,R. BO0~ 9?"t~AGE 504' RECORDS OF ST. ~?{E.C~TY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH O0 00'11" WES.T .WESTERLY LINE U~THE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT ALSO THE WEST LINE OF A FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 120, PAGE 199 THROUGH 201, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST, COUNTY, FLORIDA A DISTANCE OF 8,215.1~ PEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION THE WESTERLY R~GHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE - 95 INTERCHANGE PA~OELYA~ DELINEATED BY A DESCRIPTION AND MAP OF SURVEY OF THE I~PS INTERCHANGE ,."PRIMA VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID W. ' BET~AM, ' P.L~S,," WITH CERTIFICATION NG. 3199 WITH THE ST. LUOIE WEST T~OMAS J..'WH~TE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , DATED JANUARY SO, 1989, "WITH THE FILE N0,~'"95 ~ CONSISTING OF THREE PAGES, WITH LAST' REVISIONS ON 2-9-89; SAID POINT?O INTERSECTION BEING A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVED TO THE NORTHWEST TO WHIRR RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 47~44,14· EAST, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF FEET~ T~ENCE SOOTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARO OF SAID CURVE A DISTAN¢ FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16'~a~, ~u~,,, ............ IE OF FEET TO A POINT OF CURVA--~- ^~ - _dj_i-_fL'? .... ~ ~uuTa SP'OO'OO''WEST, LINE' OF A ,PROPOSED 80.00 FOOT INGRESS AND E~RESS..' EASemENT :HEREON REFERRED TO AS THE PROPOSED 'LEGENDS DRIV~ ." EXTENSION; ALONO. THE EASTERLY RfGHT-OF-WAy LI~E OF SAID.#LEGENDS DRIVE' .-THE COURSES AND DISTANCES~ AFORESAID POIN~ OF iNTERSECtION SEIh~'A ~O~NT'O~"A'"CURPE'C~NC'AVE 'TO THE NORTHWEST AND TO WHICH A'RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 90~,Sg'~FEET~.~H~NCE SOUTHWESTER~Y/A5ON~.~ THE ARC OF,SA}D ~URVE A DISTANCE OF ~14,96 FEET, T~ROU~ /;/ !% , POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO TNE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 735,09 FEET; -THENCE SOUTHWESTerLy ALONG THE ARC OF 'S~AID.j~ OUR~E A DISTANCE OF 249,49 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF CURVATURE 'OF. A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE N-~RT~WEST, ~AVING A'. RADIUS 611.85 FEET;'THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 'ALON~'TNE ARb ~F SAiD CUR~E: DISTANCE 0F.272.57-FEET, '-.THROUGH A CENTRAL, ANGLE,OF 2~'~1'$0'.T0 ~O~NT OF'REVERSE CURVATUR~ OF A' ¢~RV~"~ON~V~ A RADIUS 0F'812.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC, OF ] CURVE a DISTANC~ OF 571,91"FEET THROUGH K'd~N'TRAL, A~OL~'"6 ~" ~ '~ THENCE SOUTH 52 04'59, WESTt~a ~ -*-~ -~ .... k_-.. ~iL~F ~0 21 09 CURVE CONCAVE TO THE S .... O~ff~X;RVATUR~ OF A'~-' BOULEVARD, EXTE'N~iOU: ---' ..... ~.&.~NE .OF~..TH.E.'I..?~pOSED~RES~RV~'~ CURRENT.ZONING 23, 26, 27-36-39 'PUD - RED AR'i ', BLUE -RS-2 --GREEN PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLECO., INC. BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER,-P.L.S.' FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AR-1 & PUD TO PUD PETITION OF CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE. CO. ~ INC. BY AGENT: REGINA KARNER, P.L.S. FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION . FROM AR-1 & PUD TO PUD AGENDA - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Petition Associates, THURSDAY APRIL 27, 1989 7:00 P.M. of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Karner & for a change in-zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: Southeast side of Glades Cut-Off Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road) Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person de- cides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners April 4, 1989. Legal notice was published in the News Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on April 5, 1989. FILE NO. RZ-89-016 A~'FIDAVZT OF PUBLIC NOT~CE (P ease pr_nt_ - ' COunty on the rollo~/n00esc=lbed PZoperty: Zonlr~ Aries or st. Lucle : ~/.-.LL._~,not:lce:l.~.~,~.~ erect ,tn a conspJ, cuou$ place t, hls ProperCy t~e f'o~!o. Ln9 NOTZCE available r , Florida' Bu~~ ROO~ ~}[~lnla Avenue. F* t~/ 8u/ld/ng an the St. ~uc/e Sworn anti Subscr/becl Before Day or State or rlOrl~Ja t~y Commies/on Expires= /~ CEL LESS AND EXCEPTING THERE FROM. COMMERCIAL TRACT A-NORTH OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 22/' 23, ' "' EAST, ST. LUCIE 26 AND 27, TOWNSHIp $6 SOUTH,. FOLLOWS~ COUNTY,..FLORIDA' MORE PARTICULARLy PUBLIC' R~CORDS ^- ~:~z~_~ND RECORDED IN 0.~. ~ O~ ~.u.D. AS_ DESCRiBED~.'IN $ ur ~, LUCIE COUNT 0 442 PAGES 667 TH '.'" ECTION 22; T Y, FLORIDA, - . ROUGH...6?2 A HENCE SOUTH 89'45'3 , , , LYING ON THE NORTH · ~ s9'36'1~, EA . 0 THE NORTHEAST CORNE E O~ SECTION'22, /95.78 FEET ~^ .... $~n__ALONG THE NORTH LIN OF ~ R OF. SAZD..SE~TION.22;~..:THENC~ ~u ~H~ ~NTERSECTION WITH THE WE AID SECTION 2~, A D~STANCE ,~EcoR~s o~ ST, ~,.; ~..~A~, AS RECORDED IN 0.'. N~ OF ~..~O~?A POWER .AN~ · HS WESTERLy _-.o~a~ uS 8'216.~3 ~-~ -;': _---C RECORDS OF 'DEL~N~AT:ED BY A DESCRIPTION 'VISTA BOULEVARD, AND MAP OF SURVEy OF CONS/STING ~F TH-~"~~ ~O, Z989, "WITH ~' F0 ~S J!,... WHZTE_._DEVELOPMEN INTErSeCTION ~E~~. rO~S, WITH LAST REVIS O~$ ILE ~?l· ~S.~ RADIAL LINE' BEARS~'SOUTHa ,0IN:47 40~ A,CURVE CONCAV~ ToO~H~ ~;~9, SAID FEET, THENCE ' 4 14 ~AST, S' ' · ' THWEsT TO ~EET T ' SOUtHWESTERLy ALONO A~D~VE HAVING A RAD · ~ROUGH A CENTRAL A THE A~C OF ~AZD CU IUS OF 600.SC FEET TO A P ' ...... N$LE OF ~$'44'~4'~ ~.m .... RVE A DISTANCE OF WE ' ~nKUUGH A CENT ~E.A:RO OF SAIDC ' U~ ,.~<~.67 FEET TO .^.,,~A~_ ~NOLE oF 2~,32,4~,. .,,~.?X~_A O~STANOE o~ ~''oF A ~ROPOS~ ~^~ os mNTERSECTION. W~ i,,~? NORTH ~ ou.uu FOOT ''~ ~ ~STERLY.-' . :". ' INGRESS AND E~RES~, ~- ...... u".L.RIGHT REFERRED TiO AS THE PROPOSED "LEGENDS.DRIVE . EMTENsIONj T~ENCE.~SOUTHWESTERLY . -. ~-o~m=~T 'HEREON ·'AFTER ALONO THE EAmTE_RLY RIGHT-OF.WAY LINE OF SAID.#LE~ENDS DRIVE ..THE FOLLOWIN( .COURSES AND D'ISTANCES~ THE ~ORTHWEST AND TO ~HIcH A'RADr^L £~N~ ~LO{-~~vE CONCAVE SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 9 ~ eX'.I,i "ga~.SOUTH ZX'32'~,.~ .i<{.~;"'.' THE ARC'OF SA~D CURVE A DISTANCE OF ~24.g6 ~EET, THROUG ANGLE OF 07"53 49' ; ~THENCE POINT OF C SOUTH 86 21' ~ , H A ..CENTRALs'",., RA URVATURE OF A CU 33 WEST, 474~$$ F' ' · DZU$ OF RVE CONCAVE EET TO cu 7~s,oo ~EET, TH To THE SoUT.~AS '.'' ~. Z6'$$") · T ~'~ FEET, · TH v,~ A~~ ~C OF 'SA~D,;'~'' CURVATURE .O~H~N~L.,~UT~ ~'S4'~, ~.o. ~o~ _~.~CE~TRAL ANGLE o~ :' .... ~,- uu~vE CON -, au3,ZS FEZ .... ' ......' ' · 611,85: FEET; 'T CAVE TO THE N~RTH ' ' · . T TO.A DISTANCE 0 9v ~ENCE _~OUTHWSSTERLy ~ST, ~V~ A'-RADI · . . F.-.Z,S?. ~E~, .. T~R^--,, : ~6~ON~ T~E ARC oS S-,~ -,.~- , ;"..". POIN , uuu~ a ~NTRA -~u ~uRvE A~.'::.'... · T OF REVERSE C ' - .... . .., L~AN~LE.OF ~S' ' , · ~n~ aR~ .... , ~"~UU'~ ....... ~ '" ' ' THROUGH A OF Slid CU~ ' ..... ~EET;:,THEN . CENTRA . .. VE A DIS .... : .... .... OE<,.~:.... ~I.T~ 'THE N~,~,,-k.^~z oF o~'o~,~.,..'To ~,, ..... '~' RI - ~ '" .... ~ ~ ' O '<" "; ....... ' ..... ~'"'" ~OU, LEVARD. E ' ~ OHT OF WAY- L!' ... _ ~F,' XTENSION .~.: N~ OF;. ~.: ' -. ~ ....... . . AID EASTERLy ' .' . · ".,:' .... .-.,,.t'...'"~.4. ..... EVE , ~0~ ES ' RiOffT OF-WAy -,, .......... ', ~,,,~,..' · EXTENSION . . n~ Or WAY L ' ' · ":- THE FOLlOWINg COU .:_ZN~ OF ~.~: PR ·' BOARD OF COUNTY D6V LOPMCNT COMMISSION£RS DIRECTOR TERRY L. VIRTA Mar~h 29, 1989 Karner & Associates Agent for Callaway Land & Cattle Co. 2162 Reserve Park Trace Port St. Lucie, FL 34986 · Inc. Subject: Posting of Public Notice for Petition of Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc. for a change in zoning from AR-1 and PUD to PUD. The Planning and Zoning Commission hearing will be held Aprilbe held 27, May 1989.23, 1989. The Board of County Commissioners hearing will Gentlemen: In accordance with the requirements of Section 5.1.100(5), St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, you are hereby directed to report to Room 201, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, Florida, during normal business hours to receive the required public notice informational signs for the above requested public hearing. These notices are to be conspicuously posted on the subject property. In addition to the above cited signage, you will be furnished with the appropriate affidavit forms to be submitted to the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, 2300 Vir- ginia Avenue, Room 201, Ft. Pierce, Florida, 34982-5652, no later than five (5) days prior to the scheduled hearing. For your reference information, enclosed please find a copy of Section 5.1.100(5), St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact the St. Lucie County Planning~and Zoning Secretary at (407) 468-1553 and reference the file number found below. Sincerely, Terry Virta Development DirecTor TV/DJM/dcm FILE NO. RZ-89-016 Enclosure HAVER]- L. FENN. District No I · JUDY CULPEPPER, District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER District No 4 · JIM MINIX. District No. 5 County Administrator -- WELDON BE LEWIS ' ' 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Director: (407) 468-1590 · Building: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407) 468-1576 Zoning: (407) 468-1553 · Code Enforcement: (407) 468-1571 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONCRS ., ~pril ~, 1989 ~/~ TERRYL. ~R~ In compliance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, you are hereby advised that Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc., by Agent: Karner & Associates, has petitioned the Planning and Zonin~ Commission for a chan~e in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential _ 1 du/ac) and PUD (Planned Unit describedDevel°pment)property:t° PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the followin~ (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) (Location: Southeast side of ~lades Cut-off Road, approximately 3 miles south of West Midway Road) The first public hearin o P.M. on g n the e ' · .... Thursday, April 27. 19 P.~ztzon Wxll be held at 7'0 ~uminis~ration BuilA~ , 89, ~n Room 101 o~ - . 0 Florida ~ .... u~ng, 2300 Vir~ - , cu. LUCie Coun~ ~na~ time. Wri~ .... ~ g~ven an opPortunit ,' the publi hearing Will also be considered, u ~n aGvance of c ~zz comments receive~ ~ - Y to Please note that all proce · Commission ar~ ~ .... edzngs before appeal an,, ~:~J~urronically recorded ~ r~annlng and Zoning ~ u~u~slon made b,, +~ .... ' xr a person decides to with respect to any matter ~ ~'~= rxann~ng and Zoning Commission considered at such meeting or hearing, he Will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record inCludes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing Will be SWorn ~n. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opPortunity to Cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. The Petitioner proposes %o provide unified zoning for the proposed Reserve PUD, Section II. For your information a Copy of the PUD zoning is enclosed. If YOU have any questions, additional information may be obtained by Calling Area Code 407, 468-1553. Sincerely, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ST~ LU~IF~COUNT¥, FLORIDA ' ' g, Chai~mah HA~RT t. ~NN. Oistdct No. ~ · JUDY CULP~pp~R DistriC~coun~NO. 2 Ad~in~$~o~or · JACK K~£G£~._ ~£tDoNDistdc~ NO.B£0L~W;$ · RFILE 2000 V;~gini~ Avenue ® ~o~ Pierce, ~[ Dkecro~: (407) 4d~-~ 590 ® B0il ding: (407) 4d~~J 550 ® plonnin9: (~07) 4d~_j 576 Zoning: (407) ~d~-J550 · Code £nfo~ce~en~: (~07) D6V6LOPM6NT DIR6CTOR ~nu T ON II '.< ...... ~. :.< "'. .:.' HERE FROM. COMMERCIAL TRACT A'NO ' IR^NGE ~ E^S~~ ~ING.~i~ SECTIONS " -'.- '' :.- " '"" '"" RESOLUTION ASTE~Ly COR . . ' ' i:'":'%: ..... UBLIC' Rg~^-~'__84'12g AND RECOR ~v~u~ oF ST. L,~,. _r_ -D ~N 0.~. ~^^, -__ ,D. AS ISECTIoN 22; v~z~ COUNTY. ~,^~... ov~a ~42PAGES 667 fA DISTANCE ' ,--vm~ua~ LYING ON THE NORTH THENCE SOUTH 8g'4$'S$, EAST, ALONg SAID NORTH OF 9S4.93 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LINE SECT! / NORT~ 89~36,!1, EAST ~$..78 FEET TO - ..... ' ALONG THE NOR~,, ..... /~Eco~Ds OF ~ ~'OF-WAy, ^~ RE~OR~EDE~?L~'LI~ OF ~ ~LOR' !.WESTERLY L ~uu~E COUNTy, F IN O,R, BO ...... A INE OF LORIDA; O~ 97 ~A t LEo T~ ::~-THE F THENCE SO . ,. . GE Z WEST LORIDA PO . UTH O0 00' RECORDED ~u ^ . LINE OF A F?^~'-- - WEN AND LION? ~^,~,.. T~E ~EST~~, A DISTaNcE ^~-~?~ T~ROUgH 2o~ ~.~~ ~ux RIGHT- . ~ ~,2X6,~3 '' · ,'rv~Z~ RE~OR~ VISTA BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY DAVID W ICERTIF~CATION N0',319 - . ·, ~O~TING ,nuaRy 30 ' ,~o~ THOMA ~TER~E&TIoNOF~EE PAgE~, ~iT~?:_"~ITH THE 'EET, T ~o ~OUTH 47~x~,.;. _.v~ ~ON'CAVED ~^ - ..... o~; 'SAZ , ' HENCE SO0 ~= z~" ELS ' "' *v ~= NOR ~- ~v^~URE OF ^ cu ;. TH~¢E SOUTH sg, ~TAm 621,42 FEET; THENCE RVE CONCAVE Tn ~, .... O0 00" ~33,68 FEET, THROUGH ~ ~n~ SOUTHEAST SOUTHWESTERLY'ALONG T A CENTRAL HE.'ARc OF S · EST, 116,67 FEET TO A ANGLE OF 2f''',' AID, CuRvE LINE' OF A PROPOSED ~.uu FOOT INgRES '~TH T~ EASTE~L~ REDAND TO D'ISTANCEs~AS THE PROPOSED "LEgENDS.DRIvE., E~TENsION; THENCE."' .ONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF.WAY LINE OFF SAID AND .EGRESS, "LEGENDs~ASEm~N~": DR~VE" ..THE ^FOREs^ID POIN~'OF Z~TERSEc~ZON ~EI~'A p" T~E NORTHWEST AND TO SAID CURVE HAVINg W~I~H A'RADfAL OZNT_ON A CUR~E' - ' .;!:~....~' '": T~E ARC n~ .... A RADIUs OF ~n~ -r'~ZNE ~EARS S ,~u ,, .~gNCAvE .~!~' -- Oa~D CUR -~"'~g,FEET 0~.,, ~&'~2'16" "i ' .... VE A DISTANCE ', .~, ~2~ENCE ANGLE OF 07"$3'49~ .. ~?~T or cuRv ,~ ??cE souTH US OF 735, A CURVE CON . WEST, 474,$ ' cuRv oD FEET CAVE TO ' S · -~ Go-) ' THENCE ~,e~ FEET, T ~LY ALONG THE AR': AVZN? CURVATURE . SOUTH ~ , ' HROUGH 611.8 OF. a CUR~E CO .66 54 39" W..~T,' A ~TRAL ANO'~ $ FEET ' NC~VE TO · 40S,25 Ps - '-- DISTANCE ; THENCE SOUTHW THE N~THWEST · .. ET TO.A POINT'~ · 0F.272,$7. ESTERL~ · ' ~AVING - ' FEET, . ALONG'TH · . A 'RADIU ~O~NT OF ~ . 'THRgUgH A C · . E ARC Or S " S . ~ '~ ~n= sOUTHEAST.· A RADIUS 0F'812.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWEST ' CURVE A DISTANCE Or ' · THENCE SO S71,9~'F " . ERLY ALONg UT~ $2'04, , gET ~ROUO~ '. ..... · THE ARC. Op .CURVE CONCAVE S9 _W~ST, ~2~, .A ~gNT~AG~.A .SOUTHWESTERLY TO T~E SOUTHEA$,,~n ~ ~'' pm,u,~n~ THE NORTHERLY.. RIOHT-OFa '' ' NT'.~ ~OUL~VA~. ~XT~N~ZON ~ NORtHerly ~zd~T-or-w- . 31,70 FEET; T 00'25'33. ~o~HENCE SOUTH 8 FEETI T , 177,17 F EAgT~ · HENCE : SET; - ~65,~? . OF A ~' ..... NORTH 34'24''-, - THENCE NO~,, ._. FEET; THEN · : ¢ONc^vE TO ~EST, S~.~ · .~ OS~ ~ ~.._cE ~ORT~WESTE~-,. :_THE NORTHE~- ~rJ_FEE~ TO A ~^,-- ~' ROUGH · THE A .~ RA~I H O0 ~, , THENCE ~ ; - . CS OF ~? ]3 ss EAS SOUTH 8~'0 ,-, ~HENCE No ,.. ~4. ,,~ ~EE~;; THS ~, 80.00 FEE' S O~ EAST, S : RT~ 50 s6.~s, ~. ~CE NO~TH a,~,._~; THENCE .~;.. 14.39 FEET~ ,0 THE PO : ' $,491FEET EAST, l' ! 9 45 25" ' . /NT 0 ' ; THENC ' 28.,20 - - ECTION 22 ~ .... F INTERSE ~,~ z~ NORTH O0,~,...F~ET; THENCE TEE POI ITH AFORE EAST· 25 ; ' NT OF BEGZNNZ~ SAID NORTH ' r,~, 2.14 !FE! TA'INING 527.2~ ACREs MORE OR LESS. CURVE CONCAVE TO T NORTH~EST HE NORTH . .'F~T 'TO ' .. THRoUG ERL~.. ALONG T~E ~AST'~VINO A R A ~OINT Or :'CURv .... H A CENTR A~C O~s ADZUS O~ 8 ' .. ATURE uF ' ~s4,~. FE uAL ANC~E 0 ~. ~ZD CURVE - ...~,37,.FEET A., NORT E~ Tu A F_16 14'04. ..... ~ DZSTANc~ ~.~.._ I THENCE .. HEAST POINT O ' ~HENC ~'~4~83 THE ~ ^~ITH A HAD -- -- F CURVATUR E NORTH 18" , FEET,'.. , .... u~ S ~uo UF lO0 E OF A CU 14 $2' W 33 35' .' AID CU . 0,00 ~E RUE CO EST, . 08 .; THEN RUE 586.18 F ET; THENCE - NCAVE TOT " CURVAT CE NOR SST, T NORTHW HE ,. URE OF TH 15'2 ' . ~ROUOH ESTERLy A: :;.'. ~,424.00 · A CURVE CONCAv9 ~_1~ EAST 45n ._A CENTRAL ~,~..LON~ FEET; --G rO ' -.u/ FE ""~= O ' ~s~.~ THE~C T.~ so ST To ~... ':o,,.~__FEET,. THR --,.E .NORT,WEsTE ...UT~EST, ,AY' ~ P~NT. OF"":'-.. E TO T 2 FEET '' 9F 38'1 ' , SAID CU ....... ' NORTHWE HE SOUTHWEs TO A ~OINT 6 24 ~ 'THE STEELy A T, HAVIN OF CURVA .... NEE NORTH:.. FEET, LONG TH 0 A RADI TURE.. OF : 'W , THROUGH A C E ARC OF SA ,US OF 2,650 ' A CURVE: EST, 27 ENTRAL AN . ID CURVE . ,00 FEET ~ · SO ' 0.27 FEET GLE OF 25'1 ' , A DISTANCE' ; T~ENCE: . . UTH~EST TO A POI $ 29 ' OF1 . . · ' HAVING NT OF . . ; THENC ' ,I68,22 . ALONG THE A RADIUS CURVATURE 6F E'NORTH 48~' CE~T~^L ~RC OF SAID CU~..OF_4,~SO,O0 F~-- A cuRvm coNc~.~ :} ~7,--.. OF RESERVE 5 o~ , TO v~ Z8.74. ~WE~ PEEL .~00~ 448 ' ~LVD INGRE A_POINT ON ~u, .... FEET,":~'THROU~{..: NORTHEASTERLy AL '' ' T~ROUcH A CE~..f?c S~ZD c...,- . '" .. "'"'} -'. ..... . S53.97 a CURVE C ~ $7" ' OF 0 ' '"' "~ FEET; ONCAVE - , TO A ,88 FE ' DISTANCE 0 THENCE NOR TO T~E SOUT~ . ~OINT. OF ET o~ - a CEN a~C OF ' ~: .' · I10,08 FEE!T; EAST, .943,43 FEE,.TR~_~GLE OF 49' S~ID CURVE · A.'>. ~a'44,34, ~.TH~cE NO~T~ ~.,^ .... -, ~"~CE SOUT, ~.S}.~.. THENCE,:.::.',.:/ T o~, 78. '~ uo'Z6" -07 iX '~!'i:, '/ HENCE NO~TH 88'.;,3~ FEET; T"E~CE ~ST, .~SO,~s S -' · 80,18 3 39 · -..-..-. E Section 3-3.1:21~...PUD. ----~-~.- _Planned Unit (i) (2) (3) Dev~ The Planned Unit DeveloPment (PUD) district is intended to achieve residential land development of superior quality through the encouragement off Flexi- bility and creativity in design options that: (a) Permit creative apProaches to the development of residential land reflecting changes in the technology of land development; (b) allow For the efficient use of land, which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and thereby lower development costs; (c) allow desigQ options that encourage an environ_ merit of stable character, compatible with sur rounding land uses; and - (d) permit the enhancement of neighborhoods through the Preservation of natural features, the pro- vision of underground utilities, and the provi- sion of recreation areas and open space. Permitted Uses Any use permitted in the Residential, Single-Family_ 2 (RS-2); Residential, Estate (RE-2); Residential,Single_Family_3 (RS-3); Residential, Single-Family_4 (RS-4) (RS-5); Residential; Residential,Single_Family_5 , Mobile Home (RMH-5); Residential, Multiple-Family_il (RM-11); and Residential, Mult£ple-Family_18 (RM-18) zoning districts of thls Ordinance may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development district for a variety of residential densities. Uses of the types permitted in the Commercial, Neighborhood (CN) District are also permitted up to an amount not to exceed three (3) percent of the gross arsa of the Planned Unit Development. In addition, playgrounds, public and non-public parks, golf courses, country club bicycle paths, racquet sports facili~'cles, ridingS' stables, marinas, clubhouses, and lodges may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District. Standards and~ Standards and requirements for a Planned Unit Devel_ opment shall be as Follows: 125 .) Lucie County Growth Management Policy Ptan~ or of Chapter VIII, "Natucal Envi- ronment Analysis,,, of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (August 1982). On North and South Hutchinson Island, the provi- sions of Section 3.5.122(3), (4) (9) and (ld) shall also apply. ' (b) Conditions on Planned Unit Oevelo~ The 8card of County Commissioners shall 'attach any reasonable condition, limitation, or re- quirement to a Planned Unit Development ap- proval as is necessary to effectuate the pur- poses of this section and to carry out the spirit 'and purpose of the zoning regulations and the St. Luoie County Growth Management Policy Plan. Such conditions shall be set forth expressly in the resolution approving the Planned Unit Development. (i) I_mpact on School System. The Planned Unit Oeve~opment shall agree to pay to the School 8Card of St. Lucie County an amount equal to the anticipated financial lmpact on the County school system. - (ii) Maintenance of Level of Service of C · , ~evel of m~ ~v~c~, ez~ner existing or as a result of traffic generated by a pro- posed development, is determined to be below Level of Service C annually or O in the peak season, the Planned Unit Develop_ men~ shall make the roadway or other improvements necessary to maintain Level of Service D in the peak season, or make an equitable contribution toward improvement. - such (iii) Traffic Control Devices. Whenever, as the result of additional traffic generated by a proposed develop_ ment, it is determined based on the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices tha~ there is a need for installation of traf- fic control devices (including traffic signals, signing and pavemen~ markings), ~he Planned Unit Development shall be 127 (c) (d.) (e) (g) issuance of or intent to issue any re- qdi~d : regulatory permit if it can make, on a tentative basis and subject to con- firmation, the findings required in para- graph [3)(a)(v) of this section. A Planned Unit Development approval condi- tioned upon receiving notice off elther issuance of or intent to issue any re- quired regulatory permit shall not pre- clude the Board of County Commissioners, after reviewi-ng the regulatory permit application and other information, from revoking, such conditional Planned Unit Development approval (based solely upon an inability to confirm the findings required in paragraph (3)(a)(v) of this section) or from protesting the permit application. Minimum Size A Planned Unit Development shall be a minimum of ten (10) contiguous acres of land under common ownership or control. OensitZ The maximum possible permitted density of a Planned Unit Development shall not exceed the density reflected in the Growth Management Rolicy Plan. On North and South Hutchinson Island, the provisions of Section 3.3.122(7) and (8) shall govern. Area, Yard~ and Height Requirements Area, yard, and height requirements shall be determined at the time of Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval. Public Facilities The Planned Unit Development shall be designed and located so there w111 be no net public cost for the provision of water lines, sewage lines, storm and surface drainage systems and other utility systems. , Traffic and Pedestrian Circulation (i) Every dwelling unit, or other use permitted in the Planned Unit Development shall have access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. 129 (i) (i) Offstreet parking and loading areas shall be arranged so as to prevent through traffic to other parking areas. (ii) No more than fifteen (15) parking spaces shall be permitted in a continuous row without being intecrupted by landscaping. (iii) Offstreet parking and loading areas shall be screened from adjacent roads and pedes- trian watkways with hedges, dense planting, or changes in grades or walls. All lighting facilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or properties. (J) ~nd Natural Features (i) Native trees and vegetation and other natural features shall be preserved to the extent practicable. (ii) Ali sensitive environmental vegetation, trees and areas shall be preserved to the extent practicable. (iii) Landscaping for offstreet parking and loading areas shall meet the minimum requirements of Section 3.2.600. (k) Open Space Standards (i) A minimum of thirty (30) percent of the gross area of land to be committed to a Planned Unit Development must be for use as parks, recreation areas, marinas, swim- ming beaches, open space, planting, or other public purposes other than rights- of-way, utility easements, and parking areas. At least fifteen (15) percent of the total area of the Planned Unit Devel- opment shall be common open space for recreation or park use. At the request of the developer and subject to the approval of the 8card of County Commissioners, use of recreational facilities may be offered to the general public. Areas that are natural floodways, lakes, and storm water retention areas may be applied to satis- fying the total open space requirement as to the availability of and provision of 131 (0rd.87-20 8/18/87) proposed phasing Schedule,~of the total number of authorized dwelling units. Recreation facilities or facilities and other amenities Planned to serve one (1) phase of a multiphased development shall be COmpleted or appropriate security posted prior to issuance of building or mobile home permits or the recording of any final plat within that phase. No commercial facility shall permitted prior to the completion at least forty (40) percent of total number of authorized dwell units; and, e 132a statement should include a description of the ..character of the proposed development and the rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the apPlicant. (vii) A statement of the total of dwelling unit- *- .- number and tvn~ "W~ and structur=~ ~o~=~ge or build_ and net ar ...... ~=? explanation oF amounts ~P _£-' approximate o~** ~-~ .... - b{];~.. -! upen space- a~~ __o :~? ~nd net dinator ] ~ uuu uevelopment Coor- (¥iii) Information on land areas adjacent to the PrOposed Planned Unit Development and an indication of the relationships between the proposed development and existing and uses,Proposed zoning adjacent areas, includin land classifications, den es, circulation systems, public Faci zes, and Unique natural Features of the . nd. (ix) A statement describing how the Ptanned _. Unit Development is Consistent with the St. Lucie County GrOwth Management Po2icy Plan. (x) A development schedule indicating the approximate date construction of the Planned Unit Development or Stages of the Planned Unit Development can be expected to begin and be COmpleted. (xi) A statement of the apPlicant,s intentions with regard to the FUture selling or leasing of all or POrtions of the Planned Unit Development, Such as land areas, dwelling units, and commercial Facilities. (xii) A transportation impact report in accor- dance with the requirements of Section 5-~-~00(4)(g). (xiii) An environmental impact report in actor_ dance with the requirements 5-1.300(4)(h). of Section 134 h. The location and size of all areas to be cOnveyed, dedicated or reserved as ~ommon Open space, Parks, recreational areas, SChool sites and other Public USES. ~ i. The pedestrian circulation system, including its interrelationship With the vehicular circulation system. (xvi) A boundary and topographic SUrvey, with contour lines at one (1) foot intervals Prepared, signed and Sealed, , tered Florida Land Surveyor contain: a. Acreage certification of all land above the elevation Water. of Mean High b.cable. The Mean High Water_ Line, where appli- c. The location of all Submerged lands. d. The location of the Coastal Construc_ tion setback line. (xvii) A location map, which shall delineate the Project boundaries on the St Luci:e County Tax ASSessment Maps. ' (xviii) A driveway location which shall show the location of a11 driveways, Public Streets and private drives within six hundred and Sixty (660) feet of the Planned Unit Deve- lopment, along any private or public Street that will serve the project. (xix) An aerial Photograph of the property upon which the Planned Unit Development is proposed. (xx) Any Other information deemed necessary by the Development Coordinator for the reasonable review of the Proposed Planned Unit Development. (s) (f) hearing held oq the application shall be iq ~OCordanee with Section 5.1.200. Iq making a decision on the application, the BOard of County Commissioners shall con- Sider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the standards specified in Sect/on 3-3.121(3). (ii) Within a reasonaole time of the COnclusion of the public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners Shall either with COnditions, or deny the For Planned Unit Development. Time L/mits Unless Otherwise Specified in the approved application for Planned Unit Development, a Final Development Plan under the Provisions of Section 3-3.121(5) must be Filed wJ (1) year, or the Board of County approval of the application For Planned Unit Development shall become null and VOid. The time limitation may be extended not more than one time, and For not more th~ ~e year upon application to the Board of Four mis- Sioners after a public hearing held accord_ ante with the provisions of Sectil 3.1.100 and 5-1.200. Flnal Develo. merit Plan A~, roval_ (a) An apPlication for Final apProval shall include: Development Plan (i) The date on which the Preliminary Develop_ merit Plan was approved. (ii) A statement describing any changes which have been made in any documents, Plans, data, or information previously submitted. (iii) A tabular display of the Following inFor_ marion With respect to the area included in the Final Development Plan, if relevant: a. Total number of dwelling units Pro- posed by type of Structure and number of bedrooms. b. Total number of ri°n-reSidential Struc_ tures and gross Floor area. 138 (7) If the Board of County Commissioners determines that the Final Development Plan is not in substantial conformity with the approved Preliminary Development Plan, it shall deny the Final Development Plan. (iii) Notification of the Board of County Com- missioners, decision shall be mailed to all parties and filed in the Office of the Oevelopment Coordinator, in accordance with Section 5.1.200(5). (iv) Approval of the Final Development Plan by the Board of County Commissioners, togeth- er with the acceptance of all conditions associated with that approval, shall con- stitute a certified Final Development Plan. (v) Upon certification by the Chairman of Board of County Commissioners, three (3) copies of the Final Oevelopment Plan shall be signed and one (i) copy returned to the applicant with two (2) copies being re- tained by the Development Coordinator as a part of the public record. (vi) Upon approval of the Final Oevelopment Plan, the Board of County Commissioners shall direct the Development Coordinator to amend the Official Zoning Atlas to reflect Planned Unit Oevelopment (PUD) zoning for the approved development. pE~ffo~eot~,., 0,{_~~ ~ova~ of a F~nal Development Plan for P~n~d Oni~ ~~ a The approval of a Final Development Plan for a Planned Unit Development shall only constitute ap- proval of the Final Development Plan. Development of the Planned Unit Development shall not be carried out until the applicant has secured all other per- mits and approvals required by the County. Limitation of Final Plan Approval Within one (I) year after Final Development Plan approval, or such shorter time as may be established by the development schedule approved by the Board of County Commissioners, construction shall commence in accordance with the approved Final Development Plan. Failure to commence construction within that period shall, unless an extension shall have been granted by the Board of County Commissioners, automatically render null and void Final Oevetopment Plan 141 (8) approval, the Preliminary Development Plan approval upon which Final Development Plan approval depends, and alt county permits based on such approvals. Adjustments to an Approved Final Oevelopment Plan During Oevelopment During development of an approved Planned Development, adjus~ents to the approved Development Plan may be permitted as follows: (a) Minor Adjustments Unit Final The Development Coordinator may authorize minor adjustments to the approved Final Development Plan. Such minor adjustments shall be consis- tent with the intent and purpose of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, this Ordi- nance, and the Planned Unit Development as approved, and shall be the minimum necessary to overcome the particular difficulty. Such minor adjustments shall be limited to the following: (i) Increasing any dimension of any one (1) structure by not more khan ten (10) percent. (ii) Altering the location of any one (1) structure or group of structures by not more than fifty (50) feet. (iii) Altering stage or percent. the net density of any one (1) phase by more than ten (10) (iv) Altering the location of any circulation element by not more than fifty (50) feet. (v) Altering the location of any open space by not more than fifty (50) feet. (vi) Reducing the total amount of open space by not more than five (5) percent or reduclng the yard area or open space associated with any single structure by not more than five (5) percent. (vii) Altering the location, type, or quality of landscaping elements. Notice of the authorization of such minor ad- justments shall be provided to the 8card of County Commissioners. 142 (lO) (11) welfare, take any such necessary action to stop such noncompliance. (c) Action by Board of County Commissioners Within thirty (30) days following notification by the Development Coordinator, the Board of County Commissioners shall determine whether development of the Planned Unit Development is proceeding in accordance with the approved Final Development Plan. If the Board of County Commissioners finds the development is not proceeding in accordance with the approved Final Development Plan, it shall either revoke the Planned Unit Development approval or compel compliance. Inspections A{~-er Development (a) Inspections by Development Coordinator Following completion of the development of a Planned Unit Development, the Development Coor- dinator shall review the development as com- pleted and determine if it complies with the approved Final Development Plan. (b) Action by Development Coordinator If the Development Coordinator finds that the development as completed fails in any respect to comply with the Final Development Plan as approved, he shall immediately notify the 8card of County Commissioners of such fact. (c) Action by the Board of County Commissioners Within thirty (30) days following notification by the Development Coordinator, the 8card of County Commissioners shall determine whether the completed Planned Unit Development fails in any respect to follow the approved Final Devel- opment Plan. If the Board of County Commis- sioners finds the completed Planned Unit Devel- opment fails in any respect to comply with the Final Development Plan, it shall either revoke the Planned Unit Development, or take the necessary action to compel compliance. Amendments ment and Extensions of Planned Unit Develop (a) A Planned varied, or Unit Development may be amended, altered only pursuant to the stand- 144