Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAngelos, CynthiaBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COMMUNITY DCV6LOPM6NT ADMINISTRATOR TERRY L. VIRTA, AICP January 5, 1993 Ms. Cynthia Angelos~ Atty. Goldman, Bruning & Angelos, P.A. Attorneys at Law Law & Finance Building 10570 South U.S. Highway One Port St. Lucie, FL 34952 Dear Ms. Angelos: This letter is to confirm that on November 10, 1992 the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County, Florida, approved your petition granting preliminary and partial Final Development Plan approval for a Project known as Eckerd Drugs (River Park)~ a Planned Non-Residential Development, and for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development). Ainformation.COpy of the recorded Resolution No. 92-194 is enclosed for your Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA pper, Chairman JC: cb Enclosure HAVIERT L. FENN, District No. 1 ® JUDY CULPEPPER. District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER. District No 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER. District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, DisrriO; No. 5 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administrator: (407) 468-1590 · Growth Management: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407) 468-1576 PrOperty Acquisitions: (407) 468-1720 · Codes Compliance: (407) 468-1571 PORT ST. LUCIE TELEPHONE NO. (407) 878-4898 4 5 6 8 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 .~ 25 26 27 28 31 32 33 34 35 37 38 39 42 43 45 4,7 48 50 51 RESOLUTION NO. 92-194 A RESOL~ION GRANTING PRELIMINARY AND PARTIAL FI~ DEVELOPMENT p~ APPROVAL FOR A PROJECT · KNOWN AS ECKERD DRUGS (RIVER PARK) - A PIahNNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND FOR A~ CHANGE IN ZONING FOR PROPERTY IN ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ' ~~, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie 'c0un'~Y; FlOrida, has made the following determinations: CHANGE IN ZONING · 1'. Mr- Charles Grunbaum presented a petitiOn for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD ('PlannedNon-Residential Development) for certain property in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2' On September 24, 1992, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning COmmission held a public hearing of which due public notice was published in the Port St. Lucie-News and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 15 days prior to the hearing, and recommended to this Board that the requested change, in zoning from to PNRD (Planned Non- pment) be'granted. 3."On NoVember 10, 1992, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port .St.w. ~ucie 'News, and noti.fyin~ by mail of all owners of property ~thln.~500 feet.of the subject property. . 4. "The proposed zoning change is consistent with the St. Lucie County C~mp~ehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11'.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land DeveloPment Code SITE PLAN _ · 5. The petitioner is proposing an 8,600 square foot Eckerd Drug store and 6,900 square feet of' additional retail space at.the northeast corner of Prima Vista Blvd. and Floresta Drive. 6. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary site p~an ~or the proposed project and found it to meet all technical requirements-and to be consistent with th'e future 0 2 3 4 5 .6 7 8 .9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .... 19" '20 21 22 23~ 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 land use maps from the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, SUbject to the conditions set forth in Secti6h A 6f this resolutiOn. 7. On September 24, I992, the St. Lucie County P~i Zoning Commission held a public hearing of which due was published in the Port St. Lucie News and mailed to owners within 500 feet at least 15 days prior to th recommended to this Board that Pre mmlnary Dew l' ' e approval for the project known as Eckerd Drugs.be. gr. 8. This Board held a public hearing on November 10 which due public notice was published in the Port St. and. mailed, notice was sent to all property owners within u .9. The proposed ro'e ' ' P rpose, oa . P .] ct is con ' ~=..~ ~ ls, objectives ~ _~ _-.~lstent with ~UC~e~p~e~t Code, the ~t~u~~ar~s ~f the St. t =~o~ urdinances m~ o~ ~ ~ounty eom rehe . 10. The proposed project will not have an undu effect on adjacent property, the character of the traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or ot affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. ~1. Ail reasonable SteDS ha adverse ~ff?ct of the r ~ _ ~e ~een taken to · ~ uusmgn, sl~e de ~n ~ .... e immediate 12. 'The proposed project will be constructed, operated so as not to interfere with the development a neighboring property, in accordance with applicable regulations. 13. The proposed project will be served by adequate facilities and services. t4. The facilities, applicant has demons evacuation and emergencytrated that water provide adequate, fire protectiOn. access are satisfac NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board Of County c°mmissi0ners~i of the St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11 02 05 of the St. Lucie Cou Development Code, the ' ' DrUgs (River Park) - A site plan for the project known as I only, be, and the same i · Planned Non-Residential Development plan drawings for th .... ~ s.hereby, a Drov ~ · --~ ~o e P~ e_ as shown on th~ Inc., dated August 11, 1992, and date stamped received by ~ 3 c= prepared by Culpepper and Te' Lucie County Community Development Administrator on Se' 1992, subject.to the following conditions: c 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 I9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 '30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4'6 47 48 1. Only those retail trade uses which are.identified as permitted in Section 3.00.01 (Q)(2)(f), (CN Commercial Neighborhood,. S~. Lucie , County Land Development COde) shail be authorized within the~area describ~ in part C except that fuel and ice dealers (except fuel oil and bottled gas) shall not be permitted. 2. The~ signs ermitt r ' ' _ ~ P ed for the. p.ellmlnary and final PNRD shall be consistent with the City of Port St. Lucie sign regulations for commercial uses. More~specifically, signs for this project shall be limited to tlhe following: Freestanding Project Signs, Phase I "' Primary. Street Frontage (Prima Vista ~Blvd.) - 1 sign, maximum 32 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. Other Major Street Frontage (Floresta Drive) - 1 sign, maximum 16 square feet, maXimum '10 feet high. Freestanding Project Signs Phase II Primary Street Frontage (Prima Vista Blvd.) - 1 additional sign, maximum 32 square feet maximum 10 feet high. ' ~'i'Facade'~SignsPhase I~ A maximum of 150 square feet of facade signs shall be permitted for Phase I. The permitted sign area may be divided to provide for signs facing Prima viSta Blvd. and Floresta~ facade Drive. Facade Signs PhaSe II Facade signs for Phase II shall be limited to 32 square feet plus 1.5 square feet for each lineal foot'of b~siness frontage over 20 feet' not to exceed 150 feet.~ Allowance for Double Faced and Lighted Signs All signs may be double faced and directly or indirectly lighted. 0 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 '16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Setbacks for Signs All signs shall be located a minimum of ten feet from any right-of-way and five feet from any adjoinin~ property li~e. · . B, The property on which this Preliminary Development Plan Approval is granted is described as follows: ~ta 31, 32, 33, 3~, and 35 ~ Bl~k 39 Fo~" as reco~ ~ Plat Book 11 On ~ge 9 of the°fpub~cthe subdivisiOnrecords of St.entitl~Lucie C.. . The property on which Final Develoment Plan Approval and a change in zoning'from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/a¢) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) is granted is described on the attached Exhibit A prepared by Culpepper and g on October 29, 1992, and received by the St. Lucie County Department of Community Development on October 29, 1992. - D. This Final Planned Non-ResidentiaI Development approval shall expire on November 10, 1993, unless building permits are issued or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02..06.B.3, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. to be invalid or unenforceable for any .reason and the developer declines to comply ~oluntarily with that condition, 'the site plan approval granted by this resolution shall become null and void. F. A copy of this resolution shall be-attached to the site plan draWingS described in section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Administrator. G. A Certificate o'f Capacity for Phase I development only, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Administrator on November 10, 1992. o '0 0 O. 0 0 5 6 7 9 10 11 '12 13 t4 15 16 17 18 19 2.0 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 '30 31 ~32 ~33 34 35 36 37 33 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 After motion and second the vote-on this Resolution was as follows: ' Chairman Jim Minix Vice-Chairman Jack Krieger Commissioner. Judy Culpepper Commissioner HaVert L. Fenn Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner a~e Abstain Absent Aye Aye PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 10th day of November, 1992. ATTEST.: ' · CLERK -- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONErs ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ............... ~%.r~an ,..:-.:..~ ~-<¥~: .... ~.... ,~.'..: 0 0 0 DPK, H:\WP\REZONING\92008RS.ECK ST LUCIE 'COUNTY OF CAPACITY CERTIFICATE NO.: C 92 - 0264 This document certifies that concurrenc~y will be met and that adequate public facilit~ capaCit~ exists to maintain the standards for leVels of service as ~adopted in the St. Lucie COunt~ comprehensive Plan for: 1. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER: Eckerds Drugs Site Plan Phase I NO. OF UNITS: _ 1 , NO. OF SQUARE FEET: 8,600 2. PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION & TAX I.,D.# (& STREET'ADDRESS): ~ 34t~'530-0217--Q00/7~ _3419-530-0218-000/4_ 34.19-530-0219-Q00/1. ~419-530-0220-000/1_ · 3419-530-0221-000/8, NE corner of Florestai& Prima Vista 3. AS APPROVED UNDER: ~Res #: 92-194 Building Permit/Resolution Number 4. SUBJECT TO THE~,FOLLOWING CONDITIONS FOR CONCURRENCY: · a) Certificate of CaDacity only issued for Phase I b)~'Letter of Commitment for Service by SLC Utilities to be presented prior to 0btaininq building permit. OWNER'S NAME: Charles Grunbaum w ADDRESS: _2513 South Federal Hiqhway Street - Fort Pierce~ cit~ P~ONE: 40'7/461-6717 6. DEVELOPMENT ORDER:EXPIRATION DATE: 7. CERTIFICATE EXPIRATION DATE: Fla 34982 state zip November 10, !993 November 10, 1993 This Certificate of Capacity is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same parcel, and is subject to the same terms, conditions, and expiration date as listed herein. The expiration date can be extended only under the same terms and conditions as the underlying development order iBsued with this certificate, or for sub~equent~development order(s) issued for the same S ' property, u e and ~/~e as described herein. v. _ ~ ~._ DATE: ... 11/20/92 'C°mmunitiDeve lopment Administrator ST, LU~E COUNTY, FLORIDA November 20, ~1992 0 0 0 0 REGULAR: 11/10/92 , REQUEST PRESENTATION: AGENDA ~RE QU~'S ~~ Date: October SPECIAL: WORK SESSION:- ITEM DESCRIPTION - SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.- Planning Division Consider approval of Draft Resolution 92-194 granting preliminary and final PNRD (Planned Non-ReSiden%~ial Development) approval to. phase I (8,600 square feet of drug store) of the projec~i known as Eckerd D~ugs, and p~eliminar¥ PNRD approval to phase II (an additional 6,9100 square.feet of CN (Commercial Neighborhood) uses). Location: Northeast~corner of Prima Vista Blvd. and Floresta Drive. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft, ResolUtion 92-194 AVAILABLE FUNDING: ACCOUNT NUMBER / · . (IS BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED) YES: COM~UN~ TY~V.~ CONCURRENCE: i THOMAS L KINDRED COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR NO: DEPARTMENT: COt4MUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENDA( ) BOARD OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONERS ACTION DATE: 11/10/92 CC~'mm~issioher~ Krieg,,er ~,abs'tained. ' Commissioner Culpepper was absent. Vote: /% 3.. to . ~%f6'mas L. Kindred County Administrator counTY ATTO~EY i1 ass~., co. ~z~. / PUBLIC WO~S ~MZN; ~ UTZLZTZmS ~MZN. CODE 'CO~. DZR. ' ~ LEISU~ SERVICES, ~:4IN.- PERSON~ ~MIN. GRO~H MGT. DIR. " ~: , PORT 'DIR. ~ /AI~ORT DIR. PROPERTY ACQ. DIR. , ENGINEERING DIR. PURC~SING DIR. CircULPEPPER ~~11, '' ' ~, UTERPEN I NG, iN~. Consulting Engineers · Land Surveyors 805 Virginia Avenue, Suite 15 · P.O. Box 1449 Ft. Pierce, FL 34954 · (407) 464-3537 · Fax (407) 464-9497 December 08, 1992 HAND DELIVER TO: Job No. 90-15 Mr. David Kelly Planner III St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia P/venue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: Eckerd Drugs (Floresta & Prima Vista) PNRD/Signed Ordinance Dear Mr. Kelly: In response to the Public Hearings conducted for the Eckerd Drugs PNRD we have enclosed the following: 1. We have enclosed copies of the Port St. Lucie Sign Ordinance for your use and preparation of the SPecial Condition of the Permit. We appreciate your assistance in the processing of this application and hope that the above-referenced ordinance will be useful in preparatiOn of the Special Condition. It is our understanding that the Commission approve the PNRD with the Condition that the signage on the project be in accordance with the Port St. Lucie Sign Ordinance. If our office can be of any further assistance regarding this project please feel free to contact US. Sincerely, CULPEPPER & TERPENING, INC. / xc: Mr. Curtis Crenshaw Mr. Charles Grunbaum encl: a/s ' 't , * it ~iff* ' ' " * Post-lt'"brand fax tm,n,smittal memo ................... }- .... .' .......... : ....... i Art. L Art. II. Chapter 16 SIGNS* In General, ii 16-1--16.20 Conditions 'and SpeCilPlclttions, {}{} 16.21--16-31 ARTICLE L IN GENERAl, J Sec. 16-1. Enforcement by police department, The responsibility for the .enforcement of this chapter shall be borne by the police department of thc city, (Ord. 1%. 80-1, {} 6~ 1-29-80) Sec. 16-2, Exemptions from chapter provisions, This chapter does not apply to ~igns posted or erected by the police department or any o~her authorized govern- mental agency of the city. (Ord. No. 80-1, § 4, 1-20-80) Sec, 16-3, Permit required for other than residential property signs. Any signs, other than tho~e relative to single-family residential property, shall first requirs a permit issued by the city clerk for a fee as defined in section 7-1 of the Port St. Lucia Cod~, and shall conform to the specifications in Article II of this chapter, (Ord, No. 80-1, § i(B), 1-29-8.0; Ord. No. 81-58, § 1, 11.24-81) *Editor's note--~Ord. No. 80-1, § 7, passed Jan. 20, lO~O, ,repealed tho substantive provfsions of tormer Ch, 16, ~ ~6-1--16-7, 16-19~16-34, pertain{ng to signs. Sec~, 1--6, 8, 9, of O~d, No. S0-1 confined provi. sion~ which h~w b~e~ codified herein as a new Ch. I6, 16-21--16-81. Fornmr ~ I~-1--18-7, 1GlO~lfl-3d were d~rlved front Ord, No. ~6-22, {{ 1--8, pa~sed Aag. 25, I978. C~oss references--C~e enforcemen~ board, ~ 2-61 e~ oeq4 buildings and build- ing regulatiOnS, Ch. ~; license ~es ior advertising, t ~-10(I)I voa[lng prohibi~ peddlers and.solicitor, ~ 14.6: pl~ning and zoning, Ch. I5: streets, aide. walks and other public places, Ch. 17; subdivision regulations, Ch. 18; zoning ordi- n~oe, App. A. ' S~te la~ ~etereue~0u~oor advertisera~ F,S, Ch. 479. Supp. No, ti 1073 · ..I DE0-,11-92 FR i 13: b'/ PORT ~T. LUCIE CODE Sec. 16-4. Permitted signs to relate only to premises where located. Any signs permitted under this chapter, .with the exception of directional sig~m and signs'bordering major highways, shall relate only to the structure, building or proper~y upon which such signs are placed, (Ord. :No, 80-!,.§ 2(H),-1-29-S0) Sec. 16.5. Removal of nonconforming sign~. Existing signs wJthla the city which do not conform to the requirements set forth'in ~is chapter shall ~be removed, al- tered or otherwise made to conform to these requlremen~s within one year of the effective date hereof [February $, 1980]. (Ord. No, $0-1, § 8, 1-29-80) Sec'. 16-G. Procedures for special exceptions. The procedure for seeking special exceptions to the terms of this chapter shall be'. as follows: (a) The applicant-shall submit a site plan to the site plan review committee of the planning and zoning board,. which shall, in turn, submit a repor~ thereon to the city planning and zoning board. (b) A written application for special exception shall be submitted to the city planning and zoning board demon~ strating: (1) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the laud, structure or building involved; (2) That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would work a hard,hip on the appll, cant; and (3) That the specia! conditions of hardship and cir- cumstances, do not result from the actions of the applicant. ~ ,, ;. ~.~..; ' r , ' ;" ,.'," ..:,:, ,,' , . · . , ~ ...... · -'.7' .~'.",' , ,;.~ ..... ~ ,,~ .. ' .,' , :' r~ ',. · ;'; :~, ,:;,., . , .,, . i - .. · ' i. ' i . ..~ ~.., '-.. ,,~ , ',..;,., .'j . (c) A public hearing shall be held pursuant to section I5-24, ',"' '" ' N 11 .. SIGNS '~: I$-Z~ nhtg ~n.d.z?ning board shall make a recommend..at..19.n. to the'city ?~.n. cil regardin.g"osakl;' applica, tlon..for; sp~. cial excep'tl6~. (Ord, No: 80-1, § 9, 1-29-80) Sec. 1(i-7, Maintenance of sign and surrounding area.' Any sign which falls within the restrictions o£-. this chapter shall be maintained by the owner or applicant in a clean, fresh manner, and the area surrounding this sign shall be kept free of weeds and debris, (Ord. I~o. 80-1, § 3,.1-29-8(~) Sec. 16-8. Violations of chapter; notice; removal of sign; fi~e; Upon notice to any resident or nomesident that a s[g,t is in violation of thi~ chapter, and after proof of said notice by certified or registered mail or otherwise has been estab- lished, within fifteen (15) days from such notification .the police departmen~ ~hall order the removal of any sign violating this chapter, Any ind~Vidual violating this chapter will be prosecuted: and, upon conviction thereof, will be punished by a fine not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00). (Ord. No, 80-1, § §, 1-29-80) Seca. 16-9.-.16-20. Reserved.' ARTICLE II, CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS Sec. 16-21. Generally. No sign or banner, described as a board, placard or repre- sentation of any sort eonveylng information of some ki~d, shall be displayed, constructed, reconstructed, s~tuated, main- tained or erected' upon any lot or parcel of land, or upon the. premises, structures or buildings located in the city, unless such signs shall meet the conditions and specifications of' this, article. (Ord. No, $0-1, § 1, 1-29.80) Sec. 16-22. Residential property. · (a) Single.familY and two-famdy res~dent~a property signs (sale or rental). Any Sign relating to the sale or rental of single.family ~upp, No, 20 1075 · , .' ;* DEC,-I 1-92 FR I 13: ba~ _ Po~T s~', LU¢i~ COV~ or two-family residential property shall not exceed five (~) square feet in face area and shall be at.leas~ ten (10) feet-removed front the right.of-way ~bu~ting the proper~y~ ~ttachcd to a vertical support(s), The top of the sign shall not be more than thirty'six (36) inches above the ground.' There being'no structure or baild- ing on the propertY, such ~igns' shall .be at least five (5) feet removed from the right, of-way on which prope~"~y is located. There shall be only one such sign on such lot or parcel of land. (b) Multifamily residential property signs (sale or rental) in districts zoned M-l, MF-L T-1 or PUD. Any sign relating to the sale or rental of multi~mily residential property shall not exceed thirty ¢30) square feet in face. area and shallbe placed within ten (10,), f.e, et of said structure or b~i!ding.i There being.-no structure or building On the proPerty such signs shall be a~ least fifty (50) feet from tl~e center of the roadway on, wh, ich the Proper~ is located, but not less than fifteen (15) feet w~thln the property llne, and the top of the 'sign shall not be over ten (10) feet above tt~e ground. Such properties:shaI1 be limited to one sign. · , o. o, (c) Identification .signs for subdivisions, Any sign whose pur- pose is to identify ~ single-family or multlfamily residential sub- division shall conform to' the following Criteria: .Signs shall not exceed forty (40) square feet in' face area and Shall be erected at the entrance(s) to the subdivision. Sign material may be mason- ry, wood; metal, plastic or a combination thereof. Such signs may be illuminated.by ground leVel~ spotlights Which are shielded from view by landscaping· 'Where the subdivision is shielded from the street by a fence or wall,'l~ttering not exceeding twelve (12) inches in height may be permanently attached tothe fence or wail at the entrance(~), and may be illuminated as for £ree-standlng signs. (d) Model homes. Any sign relating to a model home shall not exceed sixteen (16) square feet in face area and shall be at least ten (10) feet removed £rom ~he right-of-way abutting the property on which the model home is located..The signshall be attached to a vertical support and the'top:~of the sign'shall:not be more than sixty (60) inches above the .ground. The Sign must indicate the name of the model permit holder and his registration or certifi- cate number and, if a qualified company, the name of the qualify- 1076 ,o SIGNS § 16-25 lng agent and the qualifying agen.t'a registration or certificate number. (etd. ~No. 80.1, § i(A)~' 1-29-80; Ord, No. 84.88, § 1, 8-28-84) , Sec. 16,23. Other ~.than': residential property. ~o~5 P$C, 8CD~'B-1;::B?,'PUD, LJ"O~H.I.'Any sign relat- ing:,-tb the sale °r rental of co~mercial p~ope~' shall not Supp. No~ 20 1076,1 ,, "' v.., ",,, ,:: ,,, · · , · ,'~' ,~ .?' ~=...' ~ · <.,~ ';', , p," ~.J'?. ~.. -~ ,... .. ~' .'% , ~.. ' .. · ~ ~' ' , · -~ I ' ' ~ . 'l~' ,' 1 ..>;' . ;.: , ' 'r ~ ~ ~'~',~1 '-, .' 7',"~. ~ ,,''~, :.~ . ' '.'. ~" , ~l, *. · ~..~.', ~. ¢~ i '*... ,,i..' ,,.~o''~. " ~' "' N% ,. ;"' ' ?~'~, ~" ~,, ,.~ ,:.~' ... ~.. . ~.'..,. ~,. ~ ~'"'l,:. ,,. ,, · ,~. '~l%t",., , · ... ~ .',,,~:. (.~,. .'~. '. · · . , ' ~ ':, .,.; ....... , , ..':,~ · - , ~, ...' .. .. ,, ~ . , · · ~ " 'h2~',. ',' ~ ~: 3.2 .~ ~*/."~ 'L". ' ' U,' ;,' .'~i .,./,~. ' , , %,? "c,',~,':~:,4, ~.: ,... ', SIGNS § :18-28 exceed thirty (30) square feet in face area and shall be placed within ten (10) f.ee8 of said structure or building where such sign is located. Ther~ being n° structure~ or building o~ the propcr~y, such signs ~hall be at least fifty (50) feet from the center of the roadway on which th~ property is lo,ted, bu% not less ~lmn fi~teen (15) ~ee~ within ~he property l~e, end the ~op of the si~n sh~ll not be over ten (10) feet above ground. " (~) Id~n~ificatio.n signs f~' b~ine~es. There shall ~ ,al- lowed ih [he dish.lets enumara~ed in subsection' (a) above, o~ne sign for each business or. profession attached to.the face .of. the building, Such signs shall not exceed a maximum of ~hi~y square .fee~ ~ face area, and the ~op of the sign shall not be more than fifteen (1~) feet above the ground, There may be one free-s~anding idenNfiCa~ion sign for.each eomplex,'whic~ sign shall not exceed a'maximum of si~y (60). square feet in face area and ~hall not.exceed a heigh~ of.~e~{ (!~) feet above ~he gz'ound. Such sign shall not be les~ Shun. ten (~0) feet from ~he prope~y line. Where s~ch business or. prefer, s~n borders on more.than one s~ree~, i~ may have an addi. bo al s~gn for, e~ch streeL ~o sign ~hall ex~end above: th~ roof of any ~uildlng, The'~esign of signs and ~natarIal used shall be subject t° ~he rewew and ar~roVal ~f ~he site' Plan review committee of the planning a~d zoning bo~rd, Criteria for approwd h~clude compatibilitY:of the sign wi~h the archi- t~&u~ and material of ~he buil~iing, (c) Res~a,~,,rant~, Ho~ela, MoSeYs ant Club Sig,n.~, Same [regulations] as in subsections (a) and (b) above, (d) Signs bordering ~najor highways (U.S. Rou~e Z,,Flor- ida Tu~mpik~, InNrsta~e 95). Advq~isiqg ,slg~s shall' mitred bordering these htghway~ under ~he following~,con- · !..:.~ ,, ,'., '.. ~ '., .':,'... . dltlons: , ~ ~ ,~',.'., ':: .... ; '-:',': v (1) Billboards shall b6 ~et back from the right-of-way'and ;' ":'""" :' ' ' · ' · · tr' d , '', , ~ ' '~ , , ~, ,,~.,'. : .~,~ .: :,', . · shall comply with apphcable Flotuda Statutes. :..'- i..-~: '.)'' ,.':-,i,,..'. ~,~'..,'... ' ~': :":'?""'" '" 7 '"' ~;'" ""' (2) Any such ~gns shall not exceed four hundred (400) t.";:-' "'o: :.:,':, · '~;"'," ..... · , .? .,:.t' ,.. . /. · · square feet in area and shall not exceed twenty-five ~."L':}'!.' "..'i.?..,. :L': '.' ;', · (25) re. et.tn height from :the ground, · ':... : ['::::",.'i',.;~':;:/::;>',?(~:;,:':', ':,.' · ~ ...y,. .~. ~,%.~,. ;-~{.,~o, ~. ,~ SuPIa, No, 6 ' , ' I..',, :,,,, :L~,,',.. ,,~.~ ...... :. ;, ' l.. ;"4'., .: ,:: ." ': , ': .~'.. ':/: :";, ": :.', '1077 ,,.:, .-.,.;':,,..... ,',..~, '.,' v,,, · ". ',,~%,;. · ," , %' -,L't' '¢: ;' t;.. :.,',';',,',.:'. ':,:~"., .,:', i:'. · !i:', . ,' :.., %::',:: '::~ -.:.. :. . [' ,", '~' '." ', ;,,,~ v.v:,.'. ,' .' .' .~.t~"'" '' )' · '. [.'C:, ,..:,,. ,.. ..', , ,':' .'.. , ~' . ~. :. ~., , .'~ ,. ~ ,~ l~,,~,:~,',.,'ke"',','.,*:..I'~,'''' ' ~ ,I.:,"~,..",.:~. , ,. ~,, ,..,,, · .., ., ,, , . , . .. .. . , , ,. .. iI.~,;,.' ,.'',, ' · ". ,.,~:~ . , , ~',;.'~%~.' ,.'': , ,' .., , :.. . · > -..~, ..:. ',,,' q . ~.,{ /',.,'~' ,"~'., . · .,', ;.,-,' : , ,' ,, ., · . , ;.... ,,.. , ,,'. , , ..., ,,',...,' ,",,,. ,. ,, ', ,.,',,, , . ,, .~ . ....' ~ .' , · ., . · , ..,,· ., ,. t:l, ..'., ',, · . · ,.'... · · . . , . .~ . , ~ . ~' ,, , , . , ! ., . · , : ' ',. . .~ .· - . ,' .~., i · . ~ ~ ' , ,, . ,~ · , , ~ ' ,. ~'. · ' ' '. " .~. ~, ; . .~ .~ ~ , ~. ' ~· . "., ' ' ~ '"i '' ' ' ' "' '' '' ' · .... · " ' '' --" ' : '' .... "':' '7°:2`" ,',.h-'"". ' ' · · . .. , , ', ,.. . ,. : .,.' ,., ~ ,, ; · ., ,.. , ,~. ,: '.' ..: ,. . · ,. ,., ~ ~.~, . ., . ,. , · .. , ,.- . . ~ i.. . , . '.. ........~ ; · ¢~ '. ·.,. . ~. ; ·¢ :~ : . ,. ~ . ~ , ~ ~. , .., · .. , . , . ., · . , ~,...'~ . . , ~ . · . ! , · , ,, .,, · ~' ' ', '~'.~, ',. · ' , ' ' ~ ',' ' ' ~ . ' · * ~ .. "'$, .'iN'" '~l~' ''" ~,'~"" :~' ' '· ' '' . '" ' ' '"; ' ~~"' ' '~'~' , . ~ , ,., · ~..; ·, · . :, ,. · ., · . . , . : , · ,~. '~ · ~ :',.',.: ~,. , . · , ~ · .~ ~. .. . ,~ .. ~ , · ~ · ~ . . . * . ~.. ' '* '.. '. - .· i .,; ' ~ . . ,,, . *,,' ,'' , .... ,. : . · .. . . , ..,,.. : · . .. . . , .. . ,.,; . . ? :,' ..,.;,..,,' .. ;:,..,..,.. · , .... , :,.~,;' ,..',. /, , ,... ,~ , ., ... ,,. · : . , ,., .,..,. , . ' , ,. · .,,. .,. ..... ,.;..... , '.... . . , .'.. ~ .' .., ~:,:::.~':.J{' ;.,;;,,," · ,, ,,', . , .. ' ,.,...:..'.~.'~,,..,.: :.'. '..... :..'.: ..... .',. ' .,',.-,- .... .,.-...,-' '. ,.,L;}.,,;':,~ :':i:' ,'-',.,?.. . . . ~, .= ~ ...~..~ , ,~, -,,, , .~.,~ ,%' ~. ·~ , _',...o..:,..'..-,-, .. ~.,. ~ .~., ,;.-~ - . ,,. ,. . , '-,' ~., · ~ . · . ~ ' . , , ' .. ' . . ~l ,, ii'. , . ,iI · .', · * ·.', ' ' ' '~' ~ ~ ' ' / ~ ' "'" ' ' ' ' ' ~ ' ' '' ~ ' ' ' ' ~ I; ~ ' "' ' ' · '~ ' I~ ' ~ ~ ';' ~ '.1 . . .... L . · ,'; .,.. ' , · '" ',,,.,:/ .:', ' , .... · . '. ,' · '. " .,. ,.',. ' . ',,' ~'. ,.,:~, :.,..,~ -." .'.' .... ;7, · -.' t ,,'' · ; ' .. '...I~! '.' '~..'. 2.... . .. · ... ., · ... ~. ...~ ~... . " ' ': * ' ' "" ' "" ' ,,~, ":;~"t." '"'v :: ' · :, "" ". ' ' , :~'. 3 '.", ·" · · ", ',"' "'.. ',':" - "?:'.':'/' '.' ,', ": ,' .,. · .: ,:,~ ,.,~ ..,...~: .>...., .'..'.'.(..~.~ : '... ,,:..: ,:; ,,.. ,., ,,, ':,' ,>,:;,,,.:..,:. ::,:,, .,': .,,.' -, I~,UU ~.~ 16-28 PORT ST. LUGIE CODE I.'(.3) The'rd sh'~ll be;~, minimt~m of at least one th. ous~rid · '".' "(1,000) fee~ between such signs. · (Ord.:No. $0-1~ § I(B), 1-29-80)' ' Seci'~16,24. Identification signs for public and semipublic , · '. buildings and properties.' Identification signs for public, and' semipublic buildings and properties, houses of worship,., hospitals, convalescent 'and nursing homes, cemeteries or alt~ports'shall not exceed thirty- six (.36) square feet in f~ce area. Such signs shall be at least ~ifty (50) feet from the-center of the roadway on which the property is located, but not less than fifteen (15) ieet within the Property line, and the top of 'the s~n ~hall not be over ten' (10) fee~ above the ~ ground. Such propcrtles sh~ll be limitetl to one sign e~ch to be,located near the main entrance. There shall be allowed one additional identification sign fac- ing each bordering street not to exceed sixteen (16) square feet, and at least fifty (50) ~ee~/rom the center of the road- w.~y. (Ord. No. 80-1, § 1(C), Sec. '16-25. Lighting. 1Signs permitted under, sections 16-23 and 16~24 may be illuminated ~ut not flashlng.::The"sIgns may be self-illuminaf,- ing .or illuminated by ground level spotlights which are shielded from view by landscaping. (Ord. No. $0-1, § 2(A), 1-29-80) Sec, 16.26. Political signs. · PbJiticaI signs may be posted from thirty (.30) days prior to an' election, and shah be removed within ten (10) days ~ollowing an election. Such signs shall be subject to a bonding fee as determined by e~ty. c°Uncil, refundable upon compliance with si~n removal. (Ord, No. $0-1, § 2(B), 1.29-80) ....... See...16-27. Dlre.ctional' signs. .A directional sign is ~ sign .designated to guide' or direct pedestrians or Vehicles to 'any'hL~tor.~cal place, public build- 8upp. No. 6 1078 · . , . ,.;i¢ ) · ., !. . ....,. ..... , :i.'. :,. , , i , . . , ; · .. ,...'..,.: ', ,. · ,, .'~ .;". JS~l.I ,,,'J' .~ . ~,,~ J::',,,~..~,'),:' . ,t. , , -~.,o . ~ , ~ .' . /.. ~, ~.,.. i. ~ ,., , . · · .s' "i ' ,~, . ', . , , : ., .~. .~,~o ,, ,, , ,~ . :. : ~ ,::.. : '...~ ,,.!,, . · I" ! ~ .~ * ;"' ~. t~' .. *~' ' , .,..:. ~ ~ ~ ',~;'~' . . ~. · '~ ~', ~ · · ~ ..,~ .,,.:;:.) i', :,,.. ;.:.~':'j t'..?'.'~, ':/,;' ~ ..'~.~, .. ~,. ,%.. / ~ .... .~°/~. .¥ '~ ~ . "~,Z_,..~'" . ~',, ... ',, :' ,;: ." ,.. : · ~. , ~. '~ '~'.~, .' . ; , ,, ,, .~, .: ..;' . .,.;,, .~1~ ,~. ... .. ,'. ~ ..,, ,~ ;, , , '.:.'." ; .':.. ~', ,..... · · . , , · ...~ '~.,, . ~ .,...,[,. '~ "1 ', . 'd · ~ ' .q'~'l. ' "',.: , r~. .,~" "~., · . · . ; · ' r . !.;q "...' :' --· ' ..... . . .,.,: ~:.',. ,,,.:-,, ~,,.. :~ .'~.~,. .: . ~. .:.: ;:, .:,,., ,_:..': , DEO--11,-92 FR I 14: 01 OI'I'Y UP i~Ubfl' ~t LUL;L~. ,~n ~, ~,~ ...... i~l~s, houses 6~'. worship, sabdIvistous, .r. esidential' complexes, · i!' .,.I I ! ,.. public lod~in~ Z~ciliZies, hospitals or tran~or~auon ~ac~e~; or to direct and regulate ~ra~'fic'2or the safety and conven- ience of ~he ~ublic, s~I1 be limited~.td ~ (6) ~er civic o~gan~ation or church, .and'~ limited ~o fou~: .(al ~'square fee~ U~. sign face, and b~ located a~' s~ree~ intersections or ~her location for the convenience of ~he public, Such may be ~ermi~ted in the city Fi~h~-of-w~y by the city pol~e depa~ment, bu~ 8hall b~ placed on cornerS:~f~om.~tree~ name~si~s, The number of ~e~itted ~ s~ree~, mtersoctions sba I be limited by the.~olice .de~a~ment according ~ to standards of pub- hc safety,~ Genera direc~io~l s3~s will. re~mre a one~ ~ime'.~ermt~'to be i~sued, u~on p~oper application, by th~ Police debarment of the.'d~y.' (1) Any such slgus must ~irst be approved by the site plan reView committee o~ the planning and zoning board, in accordance with the standards set in (2) through (5) below, befo:e a permit may be issued by the ci~ clerk. (2)Any such sis must be Gesthetlcally pleasing and in barony with the surroundings, , (3) Such signs may not be e~ec~ed on the way of any stree~ road or public way in such a manner as to obstruct free and, clear vision .pedestrian8 or vehicular movement .or to inter- ., ~ere with, obstruct the View of, or be 'Co.used with any authorized ~rai2ic sic'or device~ (4) SUch'signs may' be..~e~Ztted to be erected ma~or intersections'in .the.:city and a2 othe~ lock- ,ion8 ~pproved by .~he~ police department, How- ever, apy. such ~igns-~rected in residential areas · o ,,,. 1'079 {,. j *:', ...... .. :' .' . .; ~,',*~: ,. · .~ .. ;:. . ... ., :,.,,.:, ,.. :.,.......:, . :,, ,~ ,,:.--~ ': ,. .,',.';., '~, ', f'l, ~ d;, . , ,,. , · , , ~,' i · ,. ,. ~ , , ,.'.'~. ,. .. .. .., .'", .' :. · , · ,1.~, , ' ,~. , '' . , ~ ' ',., ' ~ · ~ , '~ * · ·., , f I ~ ,, ~ ~ , ,,~ .,' " .~.",',' .... . ' . ' . , . .~'.,..' : :. ,.". , . ., ' ,',. '. . · ' , Z. .' ., .,; [, . .'., ,: . .,~..,. .~ . ,..:.', -.,.'. · , ; · .. ', · . ,"';':.' , *,' r'. ' . · ' ' "' "": '"' '"' ' '" ' '" ' ":"' ' '" ""' ' ' ' '" ' '' '"" '"' '""'" " ,;';~.'..,'~. ',.. ~.,:. . ,. ' . . ',. , -.' , .,,. ~ .... .. , ,. ,,... · .. ,. ,. , · , ,,,.: ,,. , ,?,, ', , · , ... ' ' "' ' ' ~' ' " ' : ~, ', ' ' " ' ' · ' ~ ~. :' ' ~' '". ' ' ' '" ' ' '"'I ',· ,r:' 1'' ';""'";,," "' ' ' ; ~..'~..*"~ ,' . * · ,, . . · '.l ,:..~' · · '* ' .*.** '~,' · ' ' ' ,'' ;*' :.~ '*~ ' '''.~',.* ,, . . .., . · · ,. . .,*. . · .. · .. . . ~ . ~ ',, . · ..~ , · . [ ~,~ */~ · ''. ~', . f ! ! , - %.,t ,.,,,....~:. t . : ,..: , . , , . . .,. · .,..,~.~., , ,, ~.,~ .,,, . ,..,.:;.,- ...,. ,-'.-. . · . · ,, ¢. , , ., ;, : ,', ,, , , .~ · · .... . .'.; ',,',., -,.. ,... ........, .,,..., .., ., , .. .... ' · "..', ,',~".i.:,'. .. , ',.' ' ,'.' ,-i' .'" ' ' ','. .. ,':' ; ',,." ,.v"',.,'.' ,', · ,,. ,..,.. , , *., , . . · . · , ;', . ,.;.:' : , .. ,, . .. :,~.~'' . . ," ,,: ', ,.., .~ ,j ..: .'' . '' '. .... ., ~ " , · ,~ "'.'"' ..".': ,, .' · ','' '..'' ::.":, ' '" ,.';,.;'L',' '... ', .....' .... · ~"' *' ' ; ' " '"' ' · . ,. , . ...,' ,," , , ' . .'..'.', :: , . .... . ', .' "'.: ,~,":',.,~i"';;,', .,"t.,.'.'. '...',,' ~ .,";*,. .~' ",, ',,', '. · ','. · '. ' ,.,. ,., · ..,. ,..-:' . ,.,. ,,. /,~...'.: , , ..:, ,.,,.,,.., :.:.~,.:..~**. 0r.;, , ~. '; .... ''~ .... ' ' "' ' ' ' ', ' " ~'..". D.''~ ;" ." , · · "* ~ ~*t ',¢~ * *. ;.. .;'.l..:,. I~',~,~, ,r.~. ,m,p..:,.~ ,,.. L,.,:',:~' "~..' I.,,~ ,,..: ,' ? ~ ; :. ~" '~ . . . :,.:.,. ., ... . ..~.,;, ;,,.,...: . . .. ., ....,, ...: . ,. "' :~ '. "- "',,.. '~,'~ ,';..,",'_," ,,).,y,~'~' :~.,,~;:,?,,. .... : . .' . ,," . '",;. ', ":'*', , '. ;; , .. ·., .,,,, ,... ,:,.,;:.,..,'-, ,, ,,, , . .: .... '.; ..." , ·. ;;4 ,..';:-',": "V'",,~.'~"~," ' . :' ."' ,.. *,:..!, ,',...,~c,t:,~[~.. ~ , ~ .', ./· ; '1;",/ ,' ,':. ''~ . ','. .,* ~.."'~ ' n' ',~;,.%.*:'. , :''"; ' ,t ' "* ', * " *'' I ' ' ,'""*'~ *'*' "'v//:'~'~;',~' ~' § 16-27 , PORT ST. LUOiE CODE (0,rd,,,'No, 80-1, § 2(0), 1-29'-80) shal~ .b.e.no less than one~ thQus~nd (1,000) feet apart.I .on ~he s.ame street.,. , (5) Such 'sisns shall no~ exceed si×fy. (60) square feet in face area, excep~ that in~residenti=l's'r6as i. shall be limited to fifteen (15)square ~e.et .in ~ace are~, and wherever, located~ the ~oP of ~he,sizn'shall '" no~ be more''~ha.n ten :'(10) fee. t ~bove ~l{~:;~round, Sec, 16-28. Special signs or tmnnerz, ,~..-¢~ · · . ' , Signs fo~.~ecial, events, and. those not covered under %his article, other provisions O~ th~s chapter, will be ~ven ~on- sideratim~ upon application to the ·police 'depa~ment-of the city. (Ord, No. 80,1, ~ 2(D), 1-29-80) ~," . Sec, 16-29, Temporary slg~, " Any temporary sign erected by any contractor o~"~uilder on an'~~ for installation, repaY:or alteration shall be. llmi~'t6"%~' size of six (6) square, feet in face ~ea. All such oigns sh~ll be removed wi~hln' fifteen (1~) days.from ~he da~e of completion of the'work,"(0rd, No, 80-1, ~ 2(E), 1- , ~ . . ' ".. . Sec, 1~-30. Rotation prohibited,' "' ' No s{gn shall be permitted which ~nvolves~ rotation· of any of i~s parts, (Ord. No. 80-1,~'~ 2(F),"~%-29,80) , . , Sec, 16-31. ,Attachment to, No ~i,gns sha~ be fastengd ~.' ~tache~ ~o' hny"~ree, shrub or .~l~nt~ but sha]~ bz sequrely' f~sten~d.'to a' st~ke or post whi~ shall be sec~ely sgt'i~ ~h~ ground. The police depa~ men~ shall have the authority '%o immediately ~emove any signs ,in .violation of,~his section,,...(0~d, :No.' 89-1,(~, 2(G), , · ; · .. ,','~. .. ~.. {.'. ~, '; ;. '.;. · ',',., , ,,, ~', .- ,, % .. ,. , ..: .-~,: .. , .~,..-.: .,.,,, ,'(.'.. . '.. :,,,,,,..,' ~.,., .- · .':' ,, · ~,, .t.* .' ' ;' '" ' ' ' ? REGULAR: 11 /10 / 92 REQUEST PRE S ENTAT I ON: AGENDA R E Q U ~S Date: October 29, 1992 SPECIAL: · 00~UN~TY 9EVELOPMENT CONSENT; .PUBLIC WORK HEARING: XXX SESSION: ~TEM DESCRIPTION T SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.- Planning Division Consider approval of Draft Resolution 92-194 granting preliminary and final PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) approval to phase I (8,'600 square feet of drug store),of the project known as ~ck~rd Drugs, 'andprelimimaryPNRD approval to phase II (an additional 6',900 square zee~ of CN (Commercial N~ighborhood) uses). Location: Northeast ,corner of Prima Vista Blvd. and Floresta Drive. Approve Draft Resolution 92-194 ~VAILABLE FUNDING: ACCOUNT NUMBER PRESENTED By: COM~UNYT~V. AD~rN;~<3 CONCURRENCE: · . THoHAs COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR '!i'"'::':::'"i!"??;.i ........ ;:~'"~;:; ..... (IS BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED) YES: DEPARTMENT: COt4HUNITY DEVELOPMENT NO: AGENDA( ) BOARD OF COUNTY 'COMMISSIONERS ACTION Approved - see reverse side, Commissioner Krieger abstained. commissioner Culpepper was absent. DATE: 11/Z0/92 Vote: ~ 3 to Th-o'mas L. Kindred County Administrator COUNTY z~-~omrsy I/ '~ssT. Co. X~IN. / PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. , UTILITIES ADMIN. CODE 'COMP. DIN. ' LEISURE SERVICES. ADMIN. PERSONAL ADMIN. GROWTH MGT. DIN. PORT DIN. . /AIRPORT DIN. PROPERTY ACQ. DIN. _ ENGINEERING DIN. ~/ PURChaSING DI'R. 0 /i LA, ND 8 9 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI SSI ONERS. ' . ST. LUCIE COUNTY,.' FLORIDA REGULAR MI NUTES Date: November 10, 1992 Tape: 1, 2 convened': 9:15 a.m. recess: 12: 00-1: 40p. m. adjourned: 3:29 p.m. . Commissioners Present: Chairman, Jim Minix, Jack KriSger, R. Dale Trefetner, Havert L. Fenn; judy Culpepper (abSent, ill) Others Present: Tom Kindred, County Administrator; Rick Howell, Utilities .Administrator; Dan Mci ntyre, Count~ Attorney; Jim Lancaster Asst. CountY At-torney; Dennis Murphy, Land Development Manager; Terry Virta, Community Development Administrator; Joseph Mal fait; Acquisition Director; Clifford Crawford, Leis ute Services Administrator; Ronatd Brown, Public Works Administrator; Salvador Nabong, -County Engineer; Charles Bicht, Central Services Director; Terry Redden, Automative. Services Director; Donna BeaCh, Purchasing Director;-Linda Childress, Finance Director; W. Linsen, 'Sheriff' s office; A. Millie White, Deputy Clerk /~Re Resolution ~N,o, 92-_194(2-1429) ference was made to memorandum from Development Administrator, addressed to the Board, dated November '2, 1992, subject: Resolution No. 92-194, a resolution · granting preliminary and final PNRD approval to phase I of the proj.ect known as Eckerd Drugs and preliminary PNRD approval to phase II. Com. Krieger advised the Board that he will not be participating in this issue: due to the fact that he is associated with the law firm representing the petitioner. Ms. Cynthia Angelis, representative for Eckerd Drugs was present to address the Board regarding this issue. Mr, William Sherman, Port St. Lucie resident, addressed the Board in favor of this project. (recess for lunch the meeting was ~ reconvened at 12:O0 p. m. 1:40 p. m. - 1:40 p. F:.:eceiver, Tr'an sr~ itter. Dat. e Ti me Mode Pages BOARD OF COUNTY .JOMMISSION£RS DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TERRY L. VIRTA, AICP F A X # (407) 468-1735 TRANSMISSION COVER FORM TO: ~ F~ - ATTN: RE: NO.' OF PAGES SENT (INCL. COVE'R): COMMENTS: HAVERT L FENN, District No. 1 e JUDY CULPEPPER. District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER, District' No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER. District No. 4 · JIM MINIX. District' No. 5 County Administrator -- JAMES V. CHISHOLM 230© Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Director: (407) 468-t590 · Building: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407) 468-1576 Zoning: (407) 468-1553 · Code Enforcement: (407) 468-1571 PORT ST. LUCIE TELEPHONE NO. (407) 878-4898 Eckerd Drugs in River Park shall be limited to the following signs: Freestanding project Signs, Phase I Primary Street Frontage (Prima Vista Blvd.) - 1 sign, maximum 32 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. Other Major Street Frontage (Floresta Drive) - 1 sign, maximum 16 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. Freestanding Project Signs, Phase II Primary Street Frontage (Prima Vista Blvd.) - 1 additional sign, maximum 32 square feet, maximum 10 feet high. Directory Signs, Phases I and II Freestanding directory signs may be either integrated with the freestanding project signs listed above or erected as additional signs. However, the cumulative sign area and height shall not exceed the limits imposed above. Facade SignS Phase I A maximum of 150 square feet of facade signs shall be permitted for Phase. I. The permitted sign area may be divided to provide for facade signs facing the primary street frontage (Prima Vista Blvd.) and the other major street frontage (Floresta Drive). Facade Signs Phase II Facade signs for phase II shall be permitted for individual uses, Such signs shall, be limited to 32 square feet plus 1.5 square feet fOr each lineal foot of business frontage over 20 feet, not to exceed 150 square feet. AGENDA REOUk~T Date: October 29, 1992 REGULAR: , 11/10/92 SPECIAL: CONSENT: REQUEST PUBLIC WORK PRESENTATION: HEARING: XXX SESS ION: ~TEM DESCRIPTION - SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.- Planning Division ConSider approval of Draft Resolution 92-194 granting preliminary and final PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) approval to phase I (8,600 square feet of drug store) of the project known as Eckerd Drugs, and pretiminarF PNRD approval to phase II (an additional 6,900 square feet of CN (Commercial Neighborhood) uses). Location: Northeast corner of Prima Vista Blvd. and Floresta Drive. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft Resolution 92-194 AVAILABLE FUNDING: · . PRE S~NTED BY.' CO~UN1TY ~V. AD~I~: CONCURRENCE: THOMAS ~./KINDRED COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR (IS BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED) YES: NO: DEPARTMENT: COt4~UNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENDA( ) DATE: Vote: to Thomas L. Kindred County Administrator COUNTY ATTORNEY ASST. CO.' ADMIN~ · . . MANAGEMENT & BUDGET ADMIN. DEVELOPMENT ADMIN. P~,ANNING DIR.' PUBLIC WORKS ADMiN. UTILITIES AD,IN. CODEiCOMP. DI~. ~ . LEISURE SERVICES ADMIN. PERSONAL ADMIN~ GROWTH MGT. DIR. PORT DIR. AIRpORT DIR. " PROPERTY ACQ. DIR. [-ENGINEERING DIR. PURCHASING DIR. · COMMISSION REVIEW: NOVEMBER 1-0, 1992 Resolution No: 92=194 File Number: RZ-92-008 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: M E M O RAND UM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT County Commission Development Administrator November 2, 1992 Petition of Charles Grunbaum for Preliminary Planned NonResidential Development approval for the project known as Eckerd Drugs - River Park and for a Change in Zoning from RS-4 (Residential Single Family 4 du/ac to PNRD (Planned Nonresidential Development DiStrict) for property located in St. Lucie CountY, Florida. On Tuesday, November 10, 1992, you will be asked to review the petition of Charles Grunbaum for Preliminary Planned NonResidential Development approval for the project to be known as Eckerd Drugs - River park.. In additiOn, at this same hearing you Will be asked to consider the rezonin~ of a portion of the petitioned property from RS-4 (Residential, ~ingle Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned NonresidentialDeveliOpment District). This change in zoning would constitute'the granti~g'of Final Si{e Plan appr6val for the first pha~e of this ~evel~p~ent. This projeCt wiii be located at the northeast .corner of the intersection of Prima Vista Boulevard and Floresta Drive. This petition fOr PNRD approval includes an overall site plan for 15,000 square feet of retail space, to be constructed in two phases. The first Phase involves the construction of' a single story, 8,600 square ifoot retail drug store, a part of the Eckerd Drugs chain. In reviewing'this petition, staff has examined both the proposed zoning change and the submitted site Plan for consistency and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. Attached, you will find copies of the original staff report prepared on this matter as submitted to the St. Lucie County Planning and zoning Commission on september. 15, 1992 Based upon this review, and the representations of the petitioner, staff has determined that, as. submitted, the proposed November 2, 1992 Page 2 Subject: Grunbaum/Eckerd Drugs - River park File No.: RZ-92-008 change in zoning~and use of the petitioned property for restricted commercial purposes can be viewed as compatible wit~ the surrounding neighborhood. The-project site plan, Preliminary Plan and partial Final, has been determined to meet all minimum technical ~Ianned development site plan standards of the St. LuCie County Land DeVelopment Code. On September 24, 1992, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this matter and by a vote off~5 to 2, with one member abstaining, recommended that this Board approwe the above referenced petition for Preliminary Plan approval and ultimately its change in zoning from RS-4 to PNRD. This recommendation was made with three (3) specific conditions of approval associatedwith it. These conditions were: 1.) With the exception of Fuel & Ice Dealers, only retail uses which are permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district shall be allowed in the PNRD. 2.) That the applicant must provide .fl with a legal description specifying the limits of he Phase I, prior to the Final PNRD approval; 3.) Ecker~'s hours of operation shall be from 9:00 AM to 9:0~0 PM., Monday through Saturday and from 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM on Sundays. A Planned Development application is the one instance where in the change of a property's zoning designation, this Board has the ability to include any reasonably limiting associated conditions of approval. Staff has reviewed the above recommended conditions and would offer the following comments.. Se Referencing condition number 1, staff has no objection to the specificity-of'use cited, and-it is consistent with the recommendations made in our memorandum of September 15, 1992, to the Planning and Zoning Commission. However, since that time we would propose to slightly amend the original language of this condition So that it would read as follows: Only those uses identified under Section 3.00.01(Q) (2) (f), St. Lucie County Land Development Code shall be permitted within the area described in part C of this Resolution, except that fuel dealers, shall not be permitted at thi~ location. - November 2, 1992 page 3 Subject: Grunbaum/Eckerd Drugs - River Park File No.: RZ-92-008- be Regarding ~condition number 2i staff had originally requested that a specific condition of approval be ncluded in the Preliminary Plan Approval Resolution for this project requiring the submission of separate legal de~ " as since the development was proposed to be const in phases. The developers have si~ceprovided Therefore, the need to retain this condi been eliminated and it is now recommended that it not be included in any approval orders for this project. C · In regard to condition number 3, this condition was included at the direction of the Planning and Zoning Commission following the taking of public comment on the petition. Specific Planning Commission discussion about this condition, the need for and concern about it, is found in the minutes of this meeting. Staff has no opinion condition and would recommend that the Board c~ including this condition of approval if it is de ned to be in the best interest of maintaining n, od cohesiveness.~ Attached you will find a draft copy of Resolution 92-194 which would grant Preliminary planned.Nonres~dential DeVelopment approval along with partia~ Final Planned Nonresldentzal Development Staff recommendls approval of Draft Resolution 92-19.4. If you have any' questions, please let us know. SUBMITTED: Ter~/~ V~~i~ !/~ ~¢;iop~e~ Administrator TLV/DJM/me ECFJLPI(1) cc: County Administrator Planning & Zoning Commission Members County Attorney County Engineer Fire Marshal Ken Johnson Tom Pastore Cynthia Angelos Daniel COunty 2 3 4 5. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 .35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50. 51 52 RESOLUTION NO. 92-194 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVALFOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS ECKERD DRUGS (RIVER PARK) - A'PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND FOR A~CHANGE IN ZONING FOR PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: CHANGE IN ZONING 1. Mr. Charles GrunbaUm presented a petition-for a change'in · zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family -4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) for. certain property in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. On September 24, 1992, the St. Lucie COunty Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing of which due public notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 15 days prior to the hearing, and' recommended to this Board that the requested change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non- Residential Development) be granted. 3. On November 10, 1992, this Board held a! public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and notifying by mail of all owners of property within 500. fe~t of the subject property. 4. The proposed zoning change is consistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirementS" of Section 11.06.03 of the .St. Lucie County Land Development Code. SITE PLAN 5. The petitioner is proposing an 8,600 square foot Eckerd Drug store and 6,900 square feet of additional retail space at the northeast corner of Prima Vista Blvd. and Floresta Drive. ~.61 The Development Review Committee has reviewed the pre±~mlnary site plan for the proposed project and found it to.meet all technical requirements and to be consistent with the future land use maps from the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the conditions set forth in Section A of this resolution. _ 2 3 4 5 6' 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 7. on September 24, 1992, the St. Lucie County Planning and CO--Ssi°n held a pubtiChearing of which due public notice i the Port St. Lucie News and mailed to all property W· · owners ~ lthln 500 feet at least 15 recommended to thi~ Board that approval for the proje6t known as Eckerd Drugs be granted.. 8. This Board held a public hearing on November 10, .1992, of which due public nOtice was published in the POrt St.. Lucie News andmailed nOtide was sent to all property owners within 500 feet. 9. The proposed project is consistent With the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the St; Lucie County Land Development COde, the St.-Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 10. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the: neighborhood, traffic Conditions, parking, utility faci%ities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare-. 11. All reasonable ste~s have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through-building deSign, site design, landscaping and screening. 12. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development-and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 13. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. 14. The applicant has demonstrated that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project known as Eckerd -Drugs (River Park) - A Planned Non-Residential Development, Phase I onlY,.be, and the same is hereby, approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project'prepared by Culpepper and Terpening, !nc., dated August 11, 1992, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Administrator on September 2, 1992, subject to the follOwing conditions: 1. Only those retail trade uses which are identified as permitted in-Section 3,00.0.1 (Q)(2)(f), (CN CommerCial, Neighborhood, St. Lucie County Land Development C~de) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 shall ~be authorized within the area described in part C~ except that fuel and ice dealers (except fuel foil and bottled gas) shall not be permitted. 2. The hoursof operation shall be limitedto 9:00'A..M~ to 9:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday and 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M- on Sunday. B. The property on which this Preliminary Development Plan Approval is granted is described as follows: Lots 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 in Block 39 of the subdivision entitled "River Park Unit Four" as recorded in Plat BOok i1 on page 9 of the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida, C. The property on which Final Develoment Plan Approval and a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) is granted is described on the attached Exhibit A prepared by Culpepper ~and Terpening bn October 29, 1992, and received~by the St. Lucie County Department of Community Development on October 29, 1992. D. This Final Planned Non-Residential Development approval shall expire on November 10, 1993, unless building permits are issued or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06.B.3, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. E. The conditions' ' set forth in Section A are an integral nonseverable part of the site plan approval granted by this resolution. If any condition set forth in SeCtion A is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted by this resolution shall become null and void. F. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described.in Section A, which plan shall be-placed 0~ file with the~ St. Lucie County Community Development Administrator. G. A Certificate of Capacity for Phase I development only, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Administrator on November 10, 1992. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 After motion and second, the vote on this ResOlution was follows: Chairman Jim Minix XXX Vice-Chairman Jack Krieger XXX Commissioner Judy Culpepper XXX Commissioner Havert L. Fenn XXX Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner XXX PASSED ANDDULY .ADOPTED this 10th day of November, 1992. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM'AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY DPK, H:\WP\ECKERD.RES as DESCRIPTION Phase I - Eckerd Drugs A portion of Lots 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 in Block "39 of subdiviSion entitled RIVER PARK UNIT FOUR as recorded in Plat Book 11 at Page 9 of the Public Record of St. Lucie County, .]Florida, the · herein- described Phase I being more particularly described as follows: For a POINT OF BEGINNING (P.O.B.), Start at the Northwest corner of said Lot 35, said P.O.B. being located on a curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 1697..09 feet, a radial line to said P.O.B. bears S 36°07'02'' E; thence from said P.O.B. run Northeasterly along sa~.d .curve through a centr~al angle of 07°48'03'', an arc'distanCe of 231.06 feet; thence run S 40°57'46'' E, 74~26 feet; thence run S 89°07'50'' E, 19.37 feet; thence run N 42°42'05'' E, 179.25 feet; thence run S 47°17'55'' E, 11.69 feet; thence run N 39~48~27'' E, 231.43 feet; thence run S 50°11'33'' E, 10.00 feet; thence run S 39°48'27'' W, 23.93 feet; thence run S 47°!7'55'' E, 41.47 feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of a 100 foot wide right-of-way for Prima Vista Boulevard; thence run S 41°13'53'' W along the Northerly right-of-way line of Prima Vista Boulevard, 30.01 feet; thence run N 47°17'55'' W, 27.94 feet; thence run S 86°53'58'' W, 4.30 feet; thence run S 41°53'07'' W, 49.9'2 feet; thence run S 01°55'32'' E, 4.29 feet; thence run S 46°32'17" E, 14.75 feet; thence run S 42°08'43'' W, 22.00 feet; thence run S 46°32'17'' E, 12.86 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of Prima Vista Boulevard, said point being located on a curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 1847.09 feet, a radial line to said point bears S 46°32'17'' E; thence run Southwesterly along said curve and the Northerly right-of-way line of Prima Vista Boulevard through a central angle of 09°43'38'', an arc distance of 313.58 feet to a point of. compound curvature with a curve concave to the North having a radius of 25~00 feet; thence run Westerly and Northwesterly alon~' - .... said curve through' a central angle of 92°02'40'', an arc distance o'f 40.16 feet to a point of tangency located'on .the Northeasterly right-of-way line of an 80 foot wide right-of-way for Floresta Avenue; thence run N 34°46'00'' W along the Northeasterly right-of-way for Floresta Avenue, 124.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The herein described parcel contains 46,624 square feet, more or less (1.07 acres). Description prepared by Culpepper. and Terpening, Inc., 10-29-92. LEGALS 2 - 1974 -. , ~- CERTIFICATE NO.: C92-0264 that concurrency will be met and that adeqUate public to maintain the. standards for levels of service as St. LucieCounty ComprehensivePlan for: ' 1. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER: Eckerds Druos Site Plan Phase I NO. OF UNITS:' .. i , NO. OF SQUARE FEET: 8,600 2. PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION & TAX I.D.# (& 'STREET ADDRESS): 3419-530-0217-00.0/7, 3419-530-0218-000/4, 3419-530-0219-0.00/1, 3419-530-0220-000/1, 3419,530-0221-000/8, NE corner of Floresta & Prima Vista // 3. ~S APPROVED 'UNDER: Res #: ' · ~~. ' ' Building Permit/Resolution Number ~-~ ~UBJECT TO THE'~OLL~:WIN:G CONDITIONS FOR CONCURRENCY: a) Certificate of Capacity only issued for Phase I _.. b) Letter of Comm{tment for Service by SLCUSD to be presented prior to obtaining buildinq 5. OWNER'S NAME: _Charles Grunba~m ADDRESS: 2513 South-Federal Highway S%reet FOrt Pierce Fla 34982 city state zip HONE 407/461-6717 ?.°\./CERTIFIC'TE EXPIRATION D'TE, ~T~ Certificate of Capacity is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same parcel, and is subject to the same terms, conditions, and expiration date as listed herein. The expiration date can be extended only under the same terms and conditions as the underlying development order issued with this certificate, or for subsequent development order(s) issued for the same property, use and size as described herein. SIGNED: ,., · DATE' Community Development Administrator ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA August 20, 1992 CR VISTA BLVD PROJECT LOCATION. ST. LU'CIE I MART]-N C( COUNTY ROAD ZONING LAND USE 5455 5/ PLANNING~ ZONING COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORID~ SEPTEMBER 24~ 1992 I{EGULA~ HEETING · . HINUTES BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT.: Robert Carman, Robert Klein, Ken Sattler, Doug Skidmore, Jo Ann Allen, Donna Calabrese, Dixon McCain, Ralph Flowers,.and j.p. Terpening. BOARD'MEMBERS ABSENT: NONE OT~ERS PRESENT: Bill Miller/ Planning Director; Jim Lancaster, Assistant County Attorney; LUis Serna, Planner II; Diana Waite, Planner II; David Kelly, Planner III, and' Charline. Burgess Administrative Secretary. , INVOCATI.ON Chairmansilence. Terpening requested those present to stand for a moment' of PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Terpening. APPROVAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 27, 1992. Mr.lapproveSattlerthe madeu a motiOnof the that the Planning and Zoning Commission M~a~n'seconded the motion,Regularand upon roll call Ms min_tes Meeting of August 27, 1992. Mr. ~?rz?an, l~zr. Flowers, 'Mr.. S~ttler L- .,:h . -_., - Allen, Mr. ' · ~'~- z-zuualn, Ms. Calabrese, ~eln and Chairman Terpeningvoted in favor of the motionl Mr Mr. Skidmore abstained from voting because 'he was not present at that meeting. PUBLIC HEARING_-CHARLES GRUNBAUM (ECKE~ DRUGS) FILE NO. RZ-92-008 Chairman TerPeni~g stated that his firm is professiOnally involved with the development of' this project and that he wOuld therefore abstain from Voting. Mr. David Kelly presented staff comments. He stated that this petition is for a Change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family, 4du/ac) to'PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) for an 8,600 square foot Eckerd Drug Store, located on the Northeast corner of Prima ViSta Boulevard and Floresta Drive. He stated that there is a site plan for the project which shows an 6,900 sauare feet ~i~ ~A~_~ __ _ . _ additional . = ~, ~ ~=~ s ace. ~e ' ' · .- a . P s~a~ed that at th~s ppllcant Is only request~n~ nr~]~-~-- ~..~ _ t~me the = = ..... ~"=z3 r~u approval for the entire site and 1 approval for only the Eckerds site when the petition is th~ Board of County Commissioners. He stated that the Review Committee has reviewed the project and determined that it meets all technical requirements, and that the uses proposed are suitable for this site. Mr. Kelly stated that he would Continue his presentation once the applicant has been heard by the Board. Ms. CynthiaAngelos, Attorney and agent for the petitioner appeared before the..Commission. She stated that for clarification she would be presenting the Eckerd PNRDonly at this hearing. She stated that it is important to be aware of the status of the law and the Standards of Review fOr reviewing projects such as this one. She- stated that in reviewing the letters, of concerns from the surrounding homeowners, there appeared to be an "emotional involvement,, regarding this project. She stated that she felt it was necessary to go over each Standard of Review which would govern a decision regarding this project. Ms. 'Angelos quoted from sections* of the St. Lucie C'ounty Land Development C6des and the St. LuCie County Comprehensive_Plan, and. restated the standards of review listed in th~ staff . stated that this d .... ~ ....... · - . report. She =v=~a,en~ is consis~entwith all the elements of the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the spirit and intent of the Land Development Code. Ms. Angelos stated that a .traffic impact anal s~s submitted bv the dev~l~ __~ ..... Y ' .has been F' _. _ ~ ---~, =nu DOUn Prima Vista Boulevard-and loresta Drive are now operating at Level of Service A.*Prima Vista can accommodate an additional 19,334 tri s .counts as sUbmitted bythe engineer for th~sparticularPer day. ThepNRDtraffiCwould add 122 trips west and 22 trips east on Rrima vista. Floresta Drive ,can accommodate an'additionai 7,300 trips; 22 trips north and 5'6 trips south.-She stated that a representative of the engineering firm~that prepared:the Statement is also available_ to answer any questions the Board might have. Ms. Angeles stated:that because of this project's location at the of Prima Vista and Floresta, ~and because of the Subdivision pattern, this property is not ideally suited for family residences and is more appropriate for the proposed use. Ms. Calabrese asked whether or not any of the neighboring properties were zoned commercial. Ms. Angeles stated that.to the east towards U.S. Highway 1, there are six parcels that are zoned commercial. At the next major intersection to the west, the four corners of the intersection at Prima vista and 'Airoso are zoned commercial. Mr_. Kelly concluded staff's ~resentation by' stating that staff recommends that this -petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to the followingconditions: · With the exception of Fuel and Ice Dealers, only retail uses which are permitted in Neighborhood Commercial zoning shall be allowed in the PNRD; and 2. That the applicant must provide-staff with a legal ~description specifying the limits of Phase I prior to Final PNRD approval. Mr. Kelly recommended that this Board forward Resolution N°. 92-194 to the Board of .County Commissioners for final approval. Mr. Klein asked if the .condition for fuel and ice dealers will apply to both Phases I and II. Mr. kelly stated yes,'Phase I is the primary c0ncern at this point and this condition would also'ultimately apply to Phase-II ............ Mr. Klein stated that his concern was the term "ice dealers,', and whether or not that statement would be limiting the sale of ice. Mr. Kelly stated no. Mr. Klein asked whether or not these conditions would be_acceptable to the applicant. Ms. Angeles stated the conditions would be acceptable. Mr. 'Klein asked if staff was satisfied with the traffic analysis since the report had been supplied by the developer. 10 Mr. Kelly stated yes, staff had reviewed the comfortable With it. ~ report and was Mr.impactMCCainfees.aSked ifthe traffic study would determine ~the cost of Mr'.use, Kelly stated that impact fees are based on square fo bY particular zOnes in e~ ~ .... ~ .... -~. _ otage by t : * . .... ~uu~uM, cney aren~aidt~ not here is a traffic study. The traffic study i e or not ica h there.will be enough capacity on the roadway. Mr.* McCain stated that it was his understanding that a developer or* owner could present their own traffic studies, if they disagreed with the County. Mr. Kelly stated that a traffic study is done to evaluate the capacity of the roadway, and that it may be used in some cases to demonstrate that the proposed use is of a lesser intensity and s~ould therefore be subject t~a differentclassification of ~acts. Ms. Calabrese asked what type of buffering would be used in Phase I of the development. Mr. Kelly stated that the Eckerd,s lands · County's landsca e code . ~ _ cape plan wall meet the P s_ There will be a tree eve the ex~st~ng boat channel on ~ ~-,- ~ ~- _fy 30 feet, and ...... ~ u~ ~ne parcel would serve as a buffer. He stated that there will be considerable excavation on the back boundary. The site plan does'show landscaping in excess of codes. Mr. Paul Turczak, a real'tor in Port St. Lucie, appeared before the Commission. He stated that he is in favor of this petition. Five adjacent property .owners appeared before the Commission to speak in favor of the petition. Mr. Charles Grunbaum, the petitioner, appeared_ Comm*ission. He stated that he wa~ted to clarify one p°~nt__ before the the intersection of Airoso and Prima Vista. He stated ~hat-regardingthi~ intersection has a Commercial Office zoning, and to his knowledge- somethesetime.Pr°perties have been for sale without~a potential buyer for The President of River Park Homeowners Association appeared before the Commission. He read from a letter* that had been written on September 10, 1992 stating the Association Was in opposition to the petition.. Ms. Jamie Turner, an interested person, Commission. She asked if the new Eckerds Wou appeared before the day or have regular business hours, id be open 24 hours a 11 P"M.' Sunday. the hours would be from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 through Saturday and f-rom 9:.00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Ms. TUrner asked whether or not Eckerds would be able to change their to go before the Planning and Zoning Board or the BOard of County Commissioners. . Mr. Kelly stated that he was not aware of a requirement to reappear before the CommissiOn. Ms. Turner stated that her main concern was~the .added traffic, and as a resident of River Park, and speaking for most of her neighbors, she is ~n opposition to the Petition. . Ms. Nancy Mehan, an interested person, appeared before' the Commission. She skated that she is opposed to the petition because P~imathe addedtraffiCvista and Floresta.Wi~l cause more~ accidents, at the intersection of Ms. Lois Carter, an adjacent property owner, appeared before the CommiSsion. She stated that she is opposed to the petition because the buffer of pine trees along the boat channel may be removed and the lighting of the Eckerds sign will shine into her pool area behind her home. Ms. An~__osae] stated that the existing buffer of pine trees at the rear of this site will remain untouched.st. LucieShe stated that the sign will be in conformance with-the County Code. Ms. Carter whether or.not a height and size restriction can be_lace_area.Pd on the proposed sign because it. is next to a residential Mr. Kelly stated that in cases where Neighborhood Commercial-level development is allowed on residential land use there are specific restrictions on signage. ' Mr. Stefan Mathis, a consultant to the Petitioner, appeared-before ........ the Commission. He stated that his firm prepared the site plan for Eckerds and the setback leaves more than sufficient room and that the majority of the pine trees will remain as a natural buffer. There were two adjacent property owners that appeared before the Commission to speak in oppositi~on to the petition. Hearing no further comment in favor or in opposition to the petition, Chairman. Terpening clOsed the public portion of the hearing. - , 12 OppositiOn to the ~sked that letters received in favor and in be-noted in the record: IN FAVOR OPPOSED Mr. & Mrs. Weldon. Davis Mr. & Mrs~ Rene Roy, Sr.. Mr. Edward C. :Bauer Mr. Rickey Farrell, Atty Mr. MichaeI D. Kane Ms. Deborah G.i Klein Mr. & Mrs. Justin Green Walter Tomsen Mr. & Mrs. Halbert Schaf~r Mr. & Mrs. John Williams Ms. Mariacristina Yon Feldt Mr. William B. Sherman Mr. Howard Fern Mr- Charles Grunbaum Mr. H.J. Kurtz Mr. Steven J. Barone Mr. Edward C. Bauer Mr. A1 Rivett After considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set 'forth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code,' Mr. Skidmore made a motion that the Planni commission recommend e~=~ ~ .... . . _ . ng and Zonin Commissioners a rove Re ' - u~ty Board of Count PP solution. 92- · Y of the Detitio ~ ~h=~ .... # .~94, t~ereDy granting a royal ~ ~ n ...... ~=o Grunbaum (~ckerd Dru~s~.~~ .... PP · ~ ~ ~uz ~ cnange in zoning.from RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family , 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) subject to. the conditions as noted in staff's recommendation. Mr.'Sattler seconded the motion. Ms. Calabrese asked whether or not Mr. Skidmore would cOnsider amending, his motion to include limiting Eckerd's hours of operation. Mr.-Skidmore stated that he w0Uldamend his motion to read that the petitioners hours of operation shall be from 9:00 A.M. to-9:00 P.~A.~ Monday through Saturday and from 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Sundays. Mr. Carman stated that there Should not be a condition placed on the hours of operation.- There was a general discussion among the Commissioners regarding 'the hours of operation as .stated in Mr. Skidmore,s motion. Mr. Sattler stated that he would not second the motion restricting the hours of operation. Ms. Calabrese Seconded Mr. Skidmore's motion. 13 Mr he woUld amend his motion regarding the - Calabrese did not object. He stated that in a he could understand people objecting to a large si, fter 11:~00 P.M. at night. There was no response from Ms. Calabrese- Mr. Carman stated that the motion should be left ~s s~ated. Upon roll Call Ms. Allen, Mr. Carman, Mr. Skidmore, Mr. Flowers and Ms. Calabrese voted in favor of the motion. Mr. Sattler, Mr. McCain,.andMr. Klein voted against the motiOn-Chairman Terpening 'abstained from voting. Chairman Terpening informed the agent for the petitioner-that his petition would be forwarded to the Board' of County Commissioners withcQnditions:the ~commendation of approval with the following three · 1. With the exception of Fuel and Ice Dealers, only retail uses which are permitted in Neighborhood. Commercial zoning shall be allowed in the PNRD; and · That the applicant must provide staff with a legal description specifying the limits of Phase I prior to Final PNRD approval'; and 3. ECkerd's hours~0f operation shall be from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday and from 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Sundays. Mr. Klein stated that he would like it noted in the record that he voted against the motion because of limiting the hours of operation. He further stated that he is in favor of the Change in zoningas recommended by staff. Mr- MCcain stated that he'would concur with Mr. Klein's comment, he stated that this Board should not get so totally with limiting the hours of operations on the petitions that are heard. There are extenuating circumstances such as holidays ~ated tha~ he was in favor of the rezonin~,; hurricanes, etc. He the hours of business, but not the limitation Mr. Sattler stated that in all the letters he had read and the comments made by concerned citizens, he felt the major concern was the added traffic situation and not the hours of operation. He stated that he had voted against the motion because of the limitation on the business hours, He stated that he was in favor of 'the change in zoning. . A break was taken at 9:00 P.M. The hearing reconvened at 9:12 P.M. 14 TUESDAY,. NOVEMBER 10, 1992 . 9.00 A.M. Petition of..Charles Grunbaumfor a'change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non- Residential DevelOpment) to seek Preliminary.and Final Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs for the following described property: Lots '31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 in Block 39 of the Subdivision entitled "River Park Hnit Four" as recorded in Plat Book, ll-on Page 9 of the Public Records of St. Luc}e!County, Florida. (Location: Northeast corner of Floresta Avenue and Prima Vista 'BouleVard, Port St. Luci.e, Florida) If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If'a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners_with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedingS, and-that, for such purpose, ]he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon t~e request of any party to ~he proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be grahted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request, written comments received in advance of' the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to .this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on October 26, 1992. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News,' a newspaper of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on October 20, 1992. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERs ST. LUCIE 'COUNTY, FLORIDA /s/ JIM MINIX, CHAIRMAN FILE NO. RZ-92-008 .( ocaflon: Northeast corner of Flor- J ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA esta A._venue_ and Prima,Vista Boule- J /S/JIM MINIX, CHAIRMAN v~rd, port st. Lude, FL) : J . . ,,, ,,'. ".=.'. . .,.:~. ..//Pub.: Od. 20 ~2 '1 ,q t'etifion of. America s Famit~ Jt ' Golf-Sports Center, Inc.,.for'a major adjustment to. ~ PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) ·. known as Treasure islancl Amuse- ment Center.Far the following de- scribed property:. - . ~ L~lm Cecil/ The~uth ½~f thesE' ~4 of the SE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD. .¼. of the NW ~. Of Section 24, · Township 35 South Range 39 East, OF ,COUNTY COMMISStONER~ ·less righ~ of Way~for Public.R0ads, ' PUBLIC HEARI. NG ~AGENDA:-;4? · said-pa~:cel .lying in.St. Lucie Coun- NOVEMBER..10; ,1992. ./ ty,' Florida: -. ' 1'O whOM. iT ' ··' .... · - ~- ?. ...... of An- NOTICE in- co,dance with Section 1 ~e St.. Luci~ county La~!d.Deveiop~-! ~ ~m b. held in.~ St. L.J menf. C°de al~d ~c~on~ ty.Comprehe~siVe P~an that Commissioners Consid~'. :.~th~i .r.,. quest as. folloW~:.:..~:x; .~" nly. Commissioi~· Chambers, · ,~f C0~nty Administration }~;,·, ~300 v. ireinia Ave- :o~t. 'P'~&~,i~J:lo~ida on Ndvem- O]'i~9~2.~e~inn~na..'Ot'.,9..O0 ~s SOOn therea~.~ os possi--I I i l°:'a~'peOl''ar~'ct~cisi~'~hade by, b J ~<x~.d, a~enc~/;~o~:.COmmission With J ~,~?~'~,~-,~:, .::~,,., :~.~.:.,, ~ ~ .u:" .:;. :'? :' . '-? '-' ::" , ]','. "' _ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: September 24, I992 File Number: RZ-92~008 MEMORANDUM~ DEPARTMENT OF .COMMUNI~ DEVELOPMENT To: From: Date: Planning Director~~ ~'t September 15, 1992 Subject: Petition of Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd-Drugs) for preliminary .and final approval of a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family, 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) Location: -Exi~g Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Land Use Designation: Parcel Size: ~Northeast coruer of Prima Vista Blvd. and Floresta Drive RS-4 (Residential, .Single Family, 4 du/ac) PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) RU (Residential Urban) 1.74 acres Proposed Use: Surrounding Zoning: Surrounding Land Uses: FIRE/EMS Protection: NeighborhoOd Commercial, Eckerd Drug store (8,600 square feet) and 6,900 square feet of additional retail space - . . RS-4, (ReSidential, Single Family, 4 du/ac) RS-2, RS-3, RS-5 (City of Port St, Lucie) Existing - Single Family Homes Future- RU (Residential Urban) Future - RL (City of Port St. Lficie) :Station #3 (West Prima Vista Blvd.)is approximately one mile away. Utility SerVice: Water and Sewer by St. Lucie County Utilities Page 2 September I5, 1992 Petition: Charles GrUnbaum (Eckerd Drugs) File No: R7~92-008 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS Right of Way Adequacy: SchedUled Improvements: Type of Concurrency Document Required: Roads adjacent to this property have recently been improved. No 'additional fight of way is required. None Certificate of Capacity for each phase STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03 ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the official Zoning Atlas, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: le Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development COde; The proposed amendment is consistem with the spirit and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. ® Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with aH elements of the St.--- Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The amendment is consistent with all 'elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan including Future Land Use assuming that all uses Ultimately placed in phase H (the future strip center) are allOwed within the Neighborhood Commercial zoning classification. Page 3 September 15, 1992 Petition: Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) File No: RZ-92-008 e Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the existing and'proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning is consistem with existing and proposed land uses in the area. e Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; The conditions in the area have not changed. 5~ Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks,' drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The proposed use is not expected to create excessive additional demand on public facilities in this area. Water and sewer service is to be provided by St. Lucie County Utilities. The developer has submitted a traffic impact analysis which indicates that traffic generated by this project will not negatively impact the. transportation network in this area. e Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment 'would_result signilieant adverse ,impacts on the natural environment; The proposed rezoning is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The site contains a number of large pine trees which will be destroyed by this development. These trees will be replaced as indicated on the landscape plan. Page 4 September 15, 1992 Petition: Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) File No: RZ,92-008 Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative · affects of such patterns; ' This proposed PNRD, if approved, will result in an orderly and logical development pattern. The proposed PNRD is located consistently with the commercial location criteria as specified in the text of the Land Use Element of the St. Lucie County. Comprehensive Plan; ge Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and interest of.this Code; The proposed amendment has been determined not to conflict with the public interest and 'the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTs Thi.q ~--___.rezo..,~.s to PNRD would allow the construction of an 8,600 square foOt Eckerd's Drug Store and a6,900 square foot strip center on the northeast corner of Prima Vista Blvd. and Floresta Drive. The petitioners have submitted a site' plan for' this property as"required for PNRD applications and have demonstrated that the uses proposed are suitable for this site. Because of its location at the intersection of Prima Vista and Floresta, and_the existing subdivision pattern, this property is not ideally suited for single,family residences and ... .'is more appropriate for the use.that_ is proposed in this rezoning. The petitiOners have demonstrated that this retail use can exist at this site without adversely affecting surrounding residences. The project's landscape plan indicates that all boundaries adjacent to residences will be provided with landscape buffers as required in the Land Development Code. These and other improvements specified on the site plan will serve to eliminate any excessive impacts to the surrounding community. . Staff recommends that 'ou forward C . . ., Y . this petition to the Board of County omnnss~oners w~th a recommendation of approval su§ject to the following COnditions: 1. 'With the. exception of Fuel and Ice Dealers, Only' retail uses which are permitted in Neighborhood-Commercial zoning shall be allowed in.the PNRD. Page5 September '15, 1992 Petition: Charles Gmnbaum (Eckerd Drugs) File No:,RZ-92.008 . A legal, description specifying ihe limits of phase I shall be pr6vided 13rior to Final PNRD approval. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact this office. Attachments DPK/ H:\WP~,Z92008 RZ92008(DPK-p&z) County Attorney County Engineer Utilities Director Fire Marshal ~thia Angelos Press/Public Charles Grunbaum 2513 S Federal ~ Ft Pierce ~ 34982 Roads Property Acquisition Div Roger Poitras Annex 230.0 Virginia Av Ft Pierce FL 34982 Cynthia Angelos, Esq. 10570 S Federal Hwy Ste 300 Port St Lucie FL 34952 City of Port St Lucie 121 SW Port St Lucie Blvd Port St Lucie FL 34984 I-- fl I--.il- -. II II II II II II II II II tl II I1 !1 I-- II 0 II ....I ....,~ II 0 ( II, I--- X I! ¢,~ fl ...! 1.4.1 II 0 II i-- fl I1 II ~ II ~ II 0 II ~ 11 ~ il ~ it - 0 ~ II !I ~ II ~ II !1 ~ ~ 0 II ~ ~ '0 II ~ 0 II Ii II ~ 0 11 II II II II II o tl 0 11 0 II ~ 0 o ~ o O0 ~.~ 0 0 0 OO o ~'~ 0 ,--4 o o,-~ o o,-~ 0 0 -t- OO -ro II II II II II II !1 II !1 I1 II .,-4 II II !.','- tl 0 II _j II --J fl > k II f,~ I! ,.,-I 'q: II ~ I1 } I.J.I .cC II ~ (Y' ,cC ~ II 0 " ~" ~ l! (~J C~. ~ Il 0 Z LLJ fl C~ ::D Il ('~ ~ Il UJ Il 0 l'- Il C~l - LLJ Il I n,' Il ,cC .,I:C 0 ~ (/ii ~ II b..-J ~J 0 Q II ~"~-.l LL. C~Z: (n 0 ~ Il C~'-~ rl~ IL1 ~ ~ II '~'" ,,m~: ::~ 0 I! LU Li,,I ¢/~ Dl: II (00 :21:: I! C)C.A II EQ ;~ I! II Ii II Ii c~ Il ~-i 0 ~I 0 ~ 0 0 O0 ~ O0 O0 O0 .....4 0 ~-4 0 ~ ~ 0 ~0 o ~j ~0 o ~_~ o~ o ~j Il 0 O~ 0 O~ 0 O~ O~ ~ ~ .0~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 O~ ~ ~ 0 O~ o ~0 0 I-- O0 O0 Z 0 i---J _ o- 0 ,~-~ 0 -0 --~ I-- 0 -m- e-~ $l'~ 0 Or~ ~-0 "~'0 1.1.1 II o. II )-- Ii _.1 ~..~ !-- I! t--!-- II _.1 Ii ,, ,, II II II 11 il II I! II II ii Ii il I1 0 II II tull ~,' i II ,,~ 0 It CL !-- ~ !1 I.U ~ 0 Ii . (~1 ~-.~- ~ --.i · tl n,' >' Ii O- I1 O. ~ 11 -J I1 I-- ~' !1 · n,' U II I.&,l ~" It ~'~ t'~ 0 !1 0 ~ Ii n,,' '~ !-- !1 0,. O. I1 0,. ~ II ~' I.~ II t--- ~< II Z t,.L,I II ~:) I! 0 ~ I.~ II C,~ ~' !1 I! i--- I! L~ il II II ~U X il I--I-- II Z 11 II I.U 0 Zil 0~. ~-.I 0II ~ II II II II !1 II I! II 0 II ~ '~' t--. II 0 II ~ 0 ~0 I-'- I'-- Ii ~'~ ~ 0 LU oo o ~ o z o ~0 ~o 0 ~ O~ ~z oo o ~ 0 z : o 0 ' .0 0 0 ~ 0- ~ o u ~ o u ~ 0 O~ 0 O~ ~ ~ 0 O~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ('M 0 C3 C~ 0 ~ 0 if) 0 i,O Z 0 O. o/ -cZ:. / /° /- 0 ,,-.io O0 Or-.- 0 ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o o o ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ O- ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ O~ ~ i O~ ~ ~ O~ ~ 0 ~~ 0 O~ ~ ~ O~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 II Il II II II II Il II --J II ~l: II (.~ II 0 0 0 ~.~ 0 o o O0 O- Z 0 0 II !1 Ii II II II !1 II --.i II ¢ II C) 0 Z 0 0 ~=~ 0 ~l' 0 0 ~ o 0 Oo Z 0 0 l,z ~ ~ 0 O~ 0 O~ ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o 0 ~ o ~ o mi- 0 ~d- o o ~ o o ~ o cO o ~ ~0 o ~j ~0 o4 ~ oto C~l o~0 ~Z Z I-- 0 ZI'~ 0 ~00 0~.~ -ro Z 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 ~l~ 0~.~ Z 0 0 0 OU -r-o (~U - 0 ~ o 0 ~ 000 ~ 0 ~ Z ~ .-I 0 0 ~-~ =~ 0 · '~' (Z>~: 0 t~O0 -r ~Z · -r0 Z 11 II II II II II II II -.i II '~ II ~ II II II II II II II II II 0 0 ~ C~ C) ::::) o o 0 ~0 0 o ~. o o ~ o 0 II o o ,.-..t oti) o...t 00 o I-.- !10') ~ 0 0 ,'--~ ! O(l) ~ 0 0 0 ::Z:: 0 0::: ~'- 0~,.~ -r 0 0:1 :Z: (.0 ~,-> 'tO o 0 o 0 ~ o ~ o Z 0 0 o 0 0 0 Z 0 Z 0 0 0 ~ !-- 0 O~ ri-0 0 o o I-- ,,:~ t J_ .... 03Z ~-.4~ o 0 !-- II II II II Ii I! II II Il --I II II II II II II II II ~ I O. 4--ii 0 Lc~ ~' (]~ O0 C~ ,-4 Oo ~-~ ~ $~5 i~ ~- -0 ~ o o ~ 0 o ~ o 0 0 II Ii I1 I1 II II !1 It II It \ I! o Ii o II 0 I! t !1 ~ Il 0 OM Oli:l t--- IIt M 0 OM 3' 11 lO 0 '~ M :::> I1 1,0 0 "fi' ,--I 0 0---I 0 0---4 ~ 0 ~ ~ mi" ,-..'1 0 Il 0'~ tux % ~ tuX \ 0'~ tux \ (~ I tux \ o~ tux % O0 O0 0 O0 l---C) I--- cz:--- I--0 0 c:c~ ~s- 0 ~ C:~_.l i~~ CO ~'-~0 C~ ~-~0 0 OO o O0 o (:30 o ~ ~ OO ~ ~ O0 ~' ~ ~0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Z~ ~ o 0~0 0 ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~' O~ ~ ~ Z 11 ~ M~O ' H >~ H ~. %11 ~ 0 ~ Z~ ~ ~ZO~ Zll J~Z 0 aO¢ 0 ~0¢ 0 JkO< 0 ~Z O~ ~z Oo II ~U ZO a ~ ~0 11 ~ ~ ~ GU tl z ~ I! Z It o I1 o t o 0 ~ II o t o o o ~ o o I1 o m o ~' 0 m o o II o 0 o 0 ~ ~ 011 o ~ e o U ~ o 0 o - ~. 0 0 0(-,~ 0 ~-- ~-- ~ 0 ::3 · OC~f ' O,--e 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~,~ 0 0 ,-~ 0o0 0 ~ ~o0 o ~ o ~ ~1- o ~$' o o o ~ o ~ o '~' o ~' o o ~ ~ o o ~ o ~ ~'~ ~ w ~ o w · ~5 0 ~ ~ ~ C~ 0 CO 0 ~J 0 ~ II .11 fl II il II II II .-I II "~ II O0 Il I1 tl II il II II II II II II Ii II II II -J I1 I! -J Ii (23 Il · ~ Il II Z 11 (3 II i---~ II t--- !1 (/1 ,4:!1 m," :>- 11 ,~ t--- II O0 0 O0 ~ oo ~ ~ 0 ~ o ~. ~ 0 ~ o o o ~ o ~ o o 0 ~ uJ I 0 0 0 Z Z 0 O-J~ 0 - I-- ZLU~ 0 ~ I--- 0 0 .iI~)~ 0 '~- OreO -~- 0~.~ -~"0 -~' 0 z o ~ o o ~ o ~ o 0 o 0 U ~ 0 U ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ O~ ~ O~ ~ O~ ~ O~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o P~INGAND ZONING COMHISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA SEPTEHBER 24, 1992 REGULAR HEETING MINUTES BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert Carman, Robert Klein, Ken Sattler, Flowers,D°ug Skidmore,and J.p.J° Terpening.Ann Allen, Donna Calabrese, Dixon McCain,~ Ralph BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: NONE OTHERSs. PRESENT': Bill ~iller, Planning Director; Jim Lancaster, As lstant County AttOrney; Luis Serna, Planner II; Diana Waite, AdministrativePlanner II; Davidsecretary.Kelly, Planner III, and Charline Burgess, INVOCATION Chairman Terpening requested those present to stand for a moment of silence. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Terpening. APPROVAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 27, 1992. Mr. Sattler made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 27, 1992. Mr. McCain seconded the motion, and upon roll call, Ms. Allen, Mr. Carman, Mr. Flowers, Mr. Sattler, Mr. McCain, Ms. Calabrese, Mr. Klein and Chairman Terpening voted in favor of the motion. Mr. Skidmore abstained from voting because 'he was not present at that meeting. PUBLIC HEKRING - CHARLES GRUNBAUI~ (ECKERD DRUGS) FILE NO. RZ-92-008 Chairman Terpening stated that his firm is professionally involved with the development of this project and that he would therefore abstain from voting. Mr. David Kelly presented staff comments. He stated that this petition: is for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family, 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) for an 8,600 square foot Eckerd Drug Store, located on the Northeast corner of Prima Vista Boulevard and Floresta Drive. He stated that there is a site plan for the project which shows an additional 6,900 square feet of retail space. He stated that at this time the applicant is only requesting preliminary PNRD approval for the entire site and t~en f~nal approval for only the Eckerds site when the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. He stated that the Development Review Committee has reviewed the project and determined that it meets all technical requirements, and that the uses proposed are suitable for this site. Mr. Kelly stated that he would continue his presentation once the applicant has been heard by the Board. Ms. Cynthia Angelos, Attorney and agent for the petitioner appeared before the Commission. She stated that for clarification she would be presenting the Eckerd PNRD only at this hearing. She stated that it is important to be aware of the status of the law and the Standards of Review for reviewing projects 'such as this one. She stated that in reviewing the letters of concerns from the surrounding homeowners, there appeared to be an "emotional involvement., regarding this project. She stated that she felt it was necessary to go over each Standard of Review which would govern a decision regarding this project. Ms. Angelos quoted from sections of the St. Lucie County Land Development Codes and the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and restated the standards of review listed in the staff report. She stated that this development is consistent with all the elements of the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the spirit and intent of the Land Development Code. Ms. Angelos stated that a traffic impact analysis has been submitted by the developer, and both Prima Vista Boulevard and Floresta Drive are now operating at Level of Service A. Prima Vista can accommodate an additional 19,334 trips per day. The traffic counts as submitted by the engineer for this particular PNRD would add 122 trips west and 22 trips east on Prima Vista. Floresta Drive can accommodate an additional 7,300 trips; 22 trips north and 56 trips south. She stated that a representative of the engineering firm that prepared the statement is also available to answer any questions the Board might have· Ms. Angelos stated that because of this project's location at the intersection of Prima Vista and Floresta, and because of the existing subdivision pattern, this property is not ideally suited for family residences and is more appropriate for the proposed use. Ms. Calabrese asked whether or not any of the neighboring properties were zoned commercial. Ms. Angelos stated that to the east towards U.S. Highway 1, there are six parcels that are zoned commercial. At the next major intersection to the west, the four corners of the intersection at Prima Vista and Airoso are zoned commercial. Mr. Kelly concluded staff's presentation by stating that staff recommends that this petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions: ' · With the exception of Fuel and Ice Dealers, only retail uses which are permitted in Neighborhood Commercial zoning shall be allowed in the PNRD; and 2. That the applicant must provide staff With a legal description specifying the limits of Phase I prior to Final PNRD approval. Mr. Kelly recommended that this Board forward Resolution No. 92-194 to the Board of County Commissioners for final approval. Mr. Klein asked if the condition for fuel and ice dealers will apply to both Phases I and II. Mr. Kelly stated yes, Phase I is the primary concern at this point and this condition would also ultimately apply to Phase II. Mr. Klein stated that his concern was the term "ice dealers," and whether or not that statement would be limiting the sale of ice. Mr. Kelly stated no. Mr. Klein asked whether or not these conditions would be acceptable to the applicant. Ms. Angelos stated the conditions would be acceptable. Mr. Klein asked if staff was satisfied with the traffic analysis since the report had been supplied by the developer. 10 Mr. Kelly stated yes, staff had reviewed the report and was comfortable with it. Mr. McCain asked if the traffic study would determine the cost of impact fees. Mr. Kelly stated that impact fees are based on square footage by use, by particular zones in the County, they are paid whether or not there is a traffic study. The traffic study indicates whether or not there will be enough capacity on the roadway. Mr. McCain stated that it was his understanding that a developer or owner could present their own traffic studies, if they disagreed with the County. Mr. Kelly stated that a traffic study is done to evaluate the capacity of the roadway, and that it may be used in some cases to demonstrate that the proposed use is of a lesser intensity and should therefore be subject to a different classification of facts. Ms. Calabrese asked what type of buffering would be used in Phase I of the development. Mr. Kelly stated that the Eckerd's landscape plan will meet the County's landscape codes. There will be a tree every 30 feet, and the existing boat channel on the back of the parcel would serve as a buffer. He stated that there will be considerable excavation on the back boundary. The site plan does show landscaping in excess of codes. Mr. Paul Turczak, a realtor in Port St. Lucie, appeared before the Commission. He stated that he is in favor of this petition. Five adjacent property owners appeared before the Commission to speak in favor of the petition. Mr. Charles Grunbaum, the petitioner, appeared before the Commission. He stated that he wanted to clarify one point regarding the intersection of Airoso and Prima Vista. He stated that this intersection has a Commercial Office zoning, and to his knowledge these properties have been for sale without a potential buyer for some time. The President of River Park Homeowners Association appeared before the Commission. He read from a letter that had been written on September 10, 1992 stating the Association was in opposition to the petition. Ms. Jamie Turner, an interested person, appeared before the Commission. She asked if the new Eckerds would be open 24 hours a day or have regular business hours. 11 Ms. Angelos stated that the hours would be from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M., MOnday through Saturday and from 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Sunday. Ms. Turner asked whether or not Eckerds would be able to change their hours without having to go before the Planning and Zoning Board or the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Kelly stated that he was not aware of a requirement to reappear before the Commission. Ms. Turner stated that her main concern was the added traffic, and as a resident of River Park, and speaking for most of her neighbors, she is in opposition to the petition. Ms. Nancy Mehan, an interested person, appeared before the Commission. She stated that she is opposed to the petition because the added traffic will cause more accidents at the intersection of Prima Vista and Floresta. Ms. Lois Carter, an adjacent property owner, appeared before the Commission. She stated that she is opposed to the petition because the buffer of pine trees along the boat channel may be removed and the lighting of the Eckerds sign will shine into her pool area behind her home. Ms. Angelos stated that the existing buffer of pine trees at the rear of this site will remain untouched. She stated that the sign will be in conformance with the St. Lucie County Code. Ms. Carter asked whether or not a height and size restriction can be placed on the proposed sign because it is next to a residential area. Mr. Kelly stated that in cases where Neighborhood Commercial-level development is allowed on residential land use, there are specific restrictions on signage. Mr. Stefan Mathis, a consultant to the petitioner, appeared before the Commission. He stated that his firm prepared the site plan for Eckerds and the setback leaves more than sufficient room and that the majority of the pine trees will remain as a natural buffer. There were two adjacent property owners that appeared before the Commission to speak in opposition to the petition. Hearing no further comment in favor or in opposition to the petition, Chairman Terpening closed the public portion of the hearing. 12 Chairman Terpening asked that letters received in favor and in opposition to the petition be noted in the record: IN FAVOR OPPOSED Mr. & Mrs. Weldon Davis Mr. & Mrs. Rene Roy, Sr. Mr. Edward C. Bauer Mr. Rickey Farrell, Atty Mr. Michael D. Kane Ms. Deborah G. Klein Mr. & Mrs. Justin Green C.A. Schaming Mr. William B. Sherman Mr. Howard Fern Mr. Charles Grunbaum Mr. H.J. Kurtz Mr. Steven J. Barone Mr. Edward C. Bauer Mr. A1 Rivett Walter Tomsen Mr. & Mrs. Halbert Schafer Mr. & Mrs. John Williams Ms. Mariacristina Von Feldt After considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Mr. Skidmore made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners approve Resolution #92-194, thereby granting approval of the petition of Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) subject to the conditions as noted in staff's recommendation. Mr. Sattler seconded the motion. Ms. Calabrese asked whether or not Mr. Skidmore would consider amending his motion to include limiting Eckerd's hours of operation. Mr. Skidmore stated that he would amend his motion to read that the petitioners hours of operation shall be from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday and from 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Sundays. Mr. Carman stated that there should not be a condition placed on the hours of operation. There was a general discussion among the Commissioners regarding the hours of operation as stated in Mr. Skidmore's motion. Mr. Sattler stated that he would not second the motion restricting the hours of operation. Ms. Calabrese seconded Mr. Skidmore's motion. 13 Mr. Skidmore stated that he would amend his motion regarding the sig.n Iigh. ting if Ms. Calabrese did not object· He stated that in a residential neighborhood he could understand people objecting to a large sign being on after 11:00 P.M. at night. There was no response from Ms. Calabrese. Mr. Carman stated that the motion should be left as stated. Upon roll call Ms. Allen, Mr. Carman, Mr. Skidmore, Mr. Flowers and Ms. Calabrese Voted in favor of the motion. Mr. Sattler, Mr. McCain, and Mr. Klein voted against the motion. Chairman Terpening abstained from voting. Chairman Terpening informed the agent for the petitioner that his petition would be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the recommendation of approval with the following three conditions: · With the exception of Fuel and Ice Dealers, only retail uses which are permitted in Neighborhood Commercial zoning shall be allowed in the PNRD; and · · That the applicant must provide staff with a legal description specifying the limits of Phase I prior to Final PNRD approval; and Eckerd's hours of operation shall be from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday and from 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Sundays. Mr. Klein stated that he would like it noted in the record that he voted against the motion because of limiting the hours of operation. He further stated that he is in favor of the change in zoning as recommended by staff. Mr. McCain stated that he would concur with Mr. Klein's comment, he stated that this Board should not get so totally with limiting the hours of operations on the petitions that are heard. There are extenuating circumstances such as holidays, hurricanes, etc. He stated that he was in favor of the rezoning, but not the limitation on the hours of business. Mr. Sattler stated that in all the letters he had read and the comments made by concerned citizens, he felt the major concern was the added traffic situation and not the hours of operation. He stated that he had voted against the motion because of the limitation on the business hours. He stated that he was in favor of the change in zoning. A break was taken at 9:00 P.M. The hearing reconvened at 9:12 P.M. 14 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS .ST. ~LUCI E .COUNTY, FLORI DA ~.$EGULAR MI NUTES · Date: September 22, 1992 Tape: 1, 2, 3 convened: 9:18 a.m. adjourned: 12:45 p.m. Commissioners .Present: Chairman, Jim Minix, Judy Culpepper, Jack Krieger, R. Dale Trefelner, Havert L. Fenn Others Present: Tom Kindred, County Administrator; Rick Howell, Utilities, Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County .Attorney;. Heather Young, Asst. County Attorney; Terry Virta, Community Development Administrator; Ronald Brown, Public Works'Administrator; Sam Amerson, Utilities Engineer; Linda Childress, Finance Director; W. Linsen, Sheriff' s Dept.; A. Millie White, Deputy Clerk ! C. Charles Greenbaum- requeBting a change in zoning from RS-4 to PNRD to seek Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential Project to be known as Eckerd Drugs. ..BOARD OF, COUNTY COMMI 8SI ONERS ~ c~ .-:':~:.c ~L:~i... ST, LUCI E COUNTY, FLORI DA .~ REGULAR. MI NUTES ~ ~ ' "~ '~ ...... ~ ....... ~' ...... _~.s,. LL, d,:. L.O.. ~t Date: October ~6, 1992 Tape: 1, 2, 3 convened: 9:25 a.m. adjourned: 12:55 'p. m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Jim Minix; Judy Culpepper, Jack Krieger, R. Dale Trefelner, Havert L. Fenn · -, Others Present: Tom Kindred, County Administrator; Dan Kurek, Management and Budget Administrator; RiCk Howell, Utilities Administrator; Terry Virta, Community Development Administrator; Clifford Crawford, Leisure Services Administrator; ~Onal~ Brown, Public WOrks Administrator; .Charl es Bi cht, Central Services ~irector; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney;' Alice Bradice, Asst. County Attorney; Linda Childress, Finance Director; W. Linsen, Sheriff' s office; A; Millie White, Deputy Clerk e Public Hearinq Board approved the request to advertise for public hearing on November 10, 1992 the petition of Charles Grunbaum for a change. i~n zoning.... A G E N.D A R DATE: September 30, 1992 REGULAR: 10/6/92 SPECIAL: CONSENT: XXXX REQUEST PUBLIC WORK PRESENTATION: HEARING: SESSION: ITEM DESCRIPTION - SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - (Planning): Permission to Advertise Consider authorizing a public hearing on November 10, 1992 to review the petitions of: 1.) Charles Grunbaum for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) to seek Preliminary and Final Development.Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs. .RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the scheduling of the requested public hearing. AVAILABLE FUNDING: ACCOUNT NUMBER  ~ ~EV. -ADMIN% CONCURRENCE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR (IS BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED) YES: NO: DEPARTMENT: COI~4UNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENDA(,, ) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION Approved DATE: 10/6/92 Vote~ ~. to ~--~homas L. Kindred County Administrator COUNTY ATTORNEY A~ST. CO. ADMIN. / MANAGEMENT & BUDGET ADMIN. coM~'iDEV*ADMIN- ,~ PLANNING DIR. PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. UTILITIES ADM~N. CODE COMP. DIR. LEISURE SERVICES ADMIN. PERSONAL ADMIN. GROW~ MGT. DIR. PORT DIR. 'AIRPORT DIR. PROPERTY ACQ. DIR. ENGINEERING DIR. PURCHASING DIR. COUNTY COMMiSSiON REVIEw: OCTOBER 6, 1992 CONSENT AGENDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN~ DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: County Commission - C°mmunity Development Administrator ~ ~~ September 30, 1992 /? Permission to Advertise Below you will find identification of a public hearing request that is ready for presentation for final review. A request was previously a~proved for advertisement by. the Board for the October 27, 1992 hearing date, and just recently the agent for the petitioner contacted staff regarding postponing the hearing for two weeks. Staff would request that authori'zation be given for advertising so that this petition maybe presented on November 10, 1992, at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. If you have any questions, please let us know. 1.) Charles Grunbaum for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac), to PNRD (Planned Non,Residential Development) to seek Prelliminary and Final Developmeht Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs. (Location: On the northeast corner of Florest!a Avenue and Prima Vista Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, FL) TLV/cb Permission.MEM(BCC-DOCS) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Planning Director Petition File REGULAR: 9/22 / 92 REQUEST PRESENTATION: DATE: September 16 1992 L .................. ST. LUCI~' C0 SPECIAL: CONSENT PUBLIC WORK HEARING: SESSION~. ITEM DESCRIPTION SUBJECT! COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - (Planning): Permission to Advertise Consider authorizing a public hearing on October 27, 1992 to review the petitions of: 1.) Dr.. Susan McClure for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Kennel in AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) zoning. 2.) Paul Jacquin for a change in zoning from RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/a¢) to allow for the operation of a landscape nursery. ~a~'-'"~:h~!~:~s?!~:~a~ui~?/~or a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 au/ac) topN~'"("Planned NOn-Residential Development) to seek Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs. Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, by agent Maurice Snyder, for a change in zoning from IH (Heavy, Industrial) to u (Utilities) to allow for the construction of a Wastewater Treatment Plant. RECOMMENDATION= Authorize the scheduling of the requested public hearing. AVAILABLE FUNDINg: ACCOUNT NUMBER PRESENTED BY: CONCURRENCE: (IS BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED) YES: DEPARTMENTI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NO: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA(__./) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION Approved DATE: 9/22/92 as presented . Vot~:~ ~ to T~r6mas L. Kindred - County Administrator COUNTY ATTORNEY / ASST. Co. ADMIN. MANAGEMENT & BUDGET ADMIN. COMM. DEV. ADMIN. PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. UTILITIES ADMIN. CODE COMP. DIR. LEISURE SERVICES ADMIN. - , . ~ ~ERSONAL ADMIN. GROWT~ MGT. DIR. . , ~O~T DIR. AIRPORT DIR. .... PROP~Y ACQ. DIR. E~tN~ERiNG DtR. ' .¢~ PURCHASING DIR. . AGENDA REQUE~£ DATE: September 16, 1992 REGULAR:. 9./22/92 SPECIAL: REQUEST PUBLIC PRESENTATION: HEARING: CONSENT: XXXX WORK SESSION-. ITEM DESCRIPTION - SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT- (Planning): Permission to Advertise Consider authorizing a public hearing on October 27, 1992 to review the petitions of.' 1.) Dr. Susan McClure for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Kennel in AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) zoning. 2.) Paul Jacquin for a change in zoning from RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac) to allow for the operation of a landscape nursery. 3.) Charles Grunbaum for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) to seek Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs. Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, by agent Maurice Snyder, for a change in zoning from IH (Heavy, IndUstrial) to U (Utilities) to allow for the construction of a Wastewater Treatment Plant. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the scheduling of the requested public hearing. AVAILABLE FUNDING: ACCOUNT NUMBER PRESENTED BY: CONCURRENCE- COM~UN? DEV. THOMAS ~. KINDRED COUNTYADMINISTR~TOR (IS BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED) YES: NO: DEPARTMENT: CO14MUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENDA(.) ... BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION DATE: Vote: to Thomas L. Kindred County Administrator COUNTY ATTORNEY ASST. CO. ADMIN. MANAGEMENT & BUDGET ADMIN. COMM. DEV. ADMiN. PLANNING DIR. PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. UTILITIES ADMIN. CODE COMP. DIR. , LEISURE SERVICES ADMIN. PERSONAL ADMIN. GROWTH MGT. DIR. PORT DIR. AIRPORT DIR. PROPERTY ACQ. DIR. ENGINEERING DIR. PURCHASING DIR. COUNTY CO~ISSION REVIEW: SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 CONSENT AGENDA MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: DATE-. County Commission Community Development Administrator September 16, 1992 SUBJECT: Permission to Advertise Below you will find identification of a public hearing request that is ready for presentation for final review. Staff would request that authorization be given for advertising so that these petitions may be presented on October 27, 1992, at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. If you have any questions, please let us know. 1.) Dr. Susan McClure for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Kennel in AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) zoning. (Location: 3404 West Midway Road, Ft. Pierce, FL) 2.) Paul Jacquin for a change in zoning from RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac) to allow for the operation of a landscape nursery. (Location: Jenkins Road approximately 3/4 miles north of S.R. #70 (Okeechobee Road) on the southwest corner of Jenkins Road and Graham Road, consisting of 30.78 acres) 3.) Charles Grunbaum for a change ~in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) to seek Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs. (Location: On the northeast corner of Floresta Avenue and Prima Vista Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, FL) Page tWo September 16, 1992 Commission Review - Consent Agenda September 22, 1992 4.) Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, by agent Maurice Snyder, for a change in zoning from IH (Heavy, Industrial) to U (Utilities) to allow for the construction of a Wastewater Treatment Plant. (Location: Adjacent to the S.E. intersection of Canal No. 101 and '2,215 feet west of Selvitz Road) TLV/cb Permission.MEM(BCC-DOCS) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Planning Director Petition File AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1992 9:00 A.M. Petition of Charles Grunbaum for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non- Residential Development) to seek Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs for the following described property: Lots 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 in Block 39 of the Subdivision entitled "River Park Unit Four" as recorded in Plat Book 11 on Page 9 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. (Location: Northeast corner of Floresta Avenue and Prima Vista Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, Florida) If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he Will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on October 26, 1992. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News, a newspaper of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on October 20, 1992. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /s/ JIM MINIX, CHAIRMAN FILE NO. RZ-92-008 LAW OFFICES OF GOLDMAN, BRUNING, ANGELOS ~ MILDNER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW LAW AND FINANCE BUILDING. 1 0570 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY ONE PORT ST, LUCIE, FLORIDA 34952 HAROLD H. GOLDMAN, OF COUNSEL LICENSED IN FLORIDA AND PENNSYLVANIA ERIC J. I~RUNING LICENSED IN FLORIDA AND NEW JERSEY CYNTHIA G. ANGELOS LICENSED IN FI~ORIDA AND VIRGINIA ROY T. MILDNER DIANA GOLDMAN CAROLYN V. KOWALSKI HAND DELIVERED November 9, 1992 COM~',~UNiT¥ DEVELOPN~F_NT ~7) 878-470O OR ,7) 335-8332 'AX NUMBER )7) 335-8359 Commissioner Havert Fenn St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioner 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Re- Eckerd Drug PNRD Dear Commissioner Fenn: We have enclosed herewith sixteen letters in support of the referenced rezoning which will be heard by the Board tomorrow. Because we just received copies of these letters this morning, we are concerned that you may not have received them in your package and accordingly have enclosed the same herewith for your reference. These letters are in addition to thirteen letters in support of this application which were previously submitted. It is our understanding that due to a conflict with two of the Commissioners, there will be only three Commissioners eligible to vote on this matter. Accordingly, your presence at the Board meeting tomorrow will be necessary in order to establish a quorum. If you are unable to attend the meeting, we would greatly appreciate your office advising us at the earliest possible time. Thank you so much for your consideration of this matter. Should you have any questions whatsoever please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, GO~GELOS & MI LDNER, Cyg~hia G. A~elos P.A. CGA/cm Enclosures cc: Planning &Zoning Department FI~OM'"'~¢.J'OHI'q KNRtSP INSURANCE TO 4617615 992 ~OAP, D OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 23,00 VXEGINIA AVE ~0,~T PIERCE, FL ~4947 DE~ COMMISSIONERS: This let:er is wri;~em in support of the above memtiomed project.-~'i will be less drivin~ for elder~- _L_~, .~ p . ~e dazey necessi:zm~, ~ ~ =esm~em~$ an~ other residents in ~h~ ar~a. ASaln, I am i~ su~por= of the proposed project i f~el gcke=~e would be an a~se= for =he local communi=y. Eespectfully, 12:40 F R 0 M I'~: ~SEMENT OFFICE TO 14 P.04 CARMINE GILBERTI 388 E. PRIMA VISTA BLVD PT. ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34952 NOV~BER 4, 1992 JiM MINIX, CHA2RMAN ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2300 VIR6INIA AVENU~ FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34982 PNRD/~CKERDS DRUG/CHARLES ~RUNBAUM PRIMA VISTA & FLORESTA DEAR MR. MINIX; I AM A RESIDENT OF RIVER PARK AND LIVE DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE AREA iN QUESTION. I HEARTILY APPROVE THE REZ0NIN6 IN QUESTION. IT WILL BE A PLUS TO THE VALUES H]E~. THE ROADWAY .IS USED AS AN ARTERY, EAST TO US ~ AND WEST TO .195, AND IS NO LONGER CONDUCIVE TO RESIDENTIAL I RECOMMEND THAT YOU APPROVE THE ZONING CHANGE. THANK YOU, FROM M~-,~,.~iEI'IENT OFFICE TO 140~-~58759 P.05 · ' ,.' ;i',, , '" _ ',.' 't" ". " ..- ' ..... ., ...... ' ....... .................. ~i~ ......................... . ~ .'. .......................... , 2.', .............. ~:,..:,_~, .... , ,~ .......... . , j'~,_..~ .... ' ............ : ...... :. ,' .... . ....... , ' i~ ,' , · ~ ' ~ ,., ' ' ............. '-,.~: .......................... 4+.: .......................... : ...... : .......................... ,. ...................... '.~' ,.~ ..... '.'...~. ~....~ .............................. .... ..... ~ ...... ; ........................ : ....... : ....... . . , ' ,. ~ t * ................... '~"' 7' '"~ ......... ~'"'- ..................... ~ .............. ·- -: ~i. ,. .................. ~.,.'. ................... t ~ ................. ' ' . ............... .,: ........... · .......... ;~ .................. ; .... ' . ~.~ .. ..'. .. .......... ~:~ .......................... . . . ~ ....... ; .............. : ..........'; ..... . ,, . ' ': ......................... ~ ": ............................... ~ ......... ' ........ r-: ......m .....~ ...... · -' .,. . .... · " .... ........ ....... .......... ...... · .. · .. ..........· .. .. .~... ...... . ............. ~..~ ......... . ..... :....:~ ....... : ....... : ........ · ............... y ...................... ....,.. ............... ._.....,. ......................... ,~ -' "~ " ' ' ' ................. :'.-., ...................... ........ . m' ' '~, ' ........... ~. . ................... . ........... · ............................... ~... ~ [ '- . ........."'~ ..... ' ............. r .................. +' ..... ' .... ~ ............... ~ ...... ~ ......... .,- .... . ......... :...: .... , .... i~, .......... '...:.'.,,: .......... . ....... · ............ : ......................................... . ' . . . . ' ,,~ ~ ,......:... .. ' .. . .' .. ......... ...... ................. .: .................. . ....................... : ..... -;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . · . . - . . . · . ........ :~. ~-.~:- .j ....................................... ~....~ ...... ~ ......................................... ~. . . . . .. . . .... ".,',.~__,~,,~. .... . .¢~ ;~ . . ~ , , · . ~'.'~ ........ ~ ...................... . -., ............................,. .......... 11xOgx1992 12:42 FROM ~'~'~'~',REEMENT OFFICE TO le ~58J59 P.06 NOVEMBER 4, 1992 Ellis H. McKissick 4816 Sunset Blvd. Indian River Estate~, F1 34982 Eckerd Drug PNRD Rmzoning ~r~ma Vista & Floresta Mr. Mini×, Chairman St. L'ucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Ave. Fi. Pierce, F1 34982 Dear Mr. Chairman and All Commissioners: My Mother own~ a house on Prima Vista Blvd And I live nearby in Indian R~ver Estates. In the interest of my Mother and the local residents in the area being effected by the above zoning change, I would like to voice a couple of obvious points in favor of the zoning change. a) It would offer area resident, s the option of neighborhood .shopping without having to travel to US ~1 b) The project falls in line with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Future Land Use plan for Neighborhood Corra~ercial Zoning c) PNRD Zoning p~ovides for and protects the community from any oses that do not conforra. I ask the Board of County Co~missioners to approve the zoning change. Thank you for your time and consideration, Sincerely, is H. McKissick Gr~?etchen G r,~een 55(')6 O].eander. Avenue Whit,'= ...... Ci 't-:y..., F'iorida .... .__.,-~.?";~.-,~ St. Lucie County Board o¥ County Commissi-.:~ner. s 2300 VirBinia Avenue Ft,, l='ierce.~ F'L.-,'~4 ..... ~,'~.,~:'~ Dear" Mr. Minix and Commissioner. s; As a resident o~ St. .L. uc~.e Count',/ but bein9 a new comer to this ~r,=~. ;[ ~:m,='~ -bh~.~- an C'-kerds o~-*m would be a ~,..:. van ........................ ,.... s t . - . ",= ~ t ad t.a,~= at the abc, ye mentioned loc.atic, n. The r~oa.d serves as a '*~',,,,oroush.':'~.-a,--=' '"¢~ to '~-~'~.,~ east as well as 'bhm west and it would nC . . ~ .~ ~. ~}a~-'¢,-..,_ sense ~"-~,_, build any.. residential housin8 on this road at th~.s' -~.ime op anytime in the '~uture,, Because o¢ i'~s unique status as nnm o¥ ¢,ni*, two major access roads '~- thC, w:s'~- ** para .... ¢ ,.o ..... e, n o¢ Pt c't Lucie as time 9oes on the tra¥¥ic use will only inet-ease. Good plannin9 dictates that this area be rezoned in the best interests o~ the nei:Dhbophood and the PNRD will de¢initely accc, mplish that. , _ FNF,._,., and recommend th-. approve thru -" "'"' , ,,=t you. tchen Gr,.~ ! iq F] A T I 0 N: p l::? I i'."i,':h V ]] ~ii.:; T A ',.'::., ~ ,, ......................... ,. ....... & F'!_.. C) F:'; 15~ S T A November 3, 1992 St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Re: Eckerds PNRD/ Charles Grunbaum Prima Vista & Floresta The purpose of this letter is to recommend that you approve the "Eckerds" PNRD. It will be an asset to the community to have --_a business like this. We can use more neighborhood businesses to provide basic services. This corner is not suitable for residential purposes. Yours Truly, l~r. & Mrs. Wally Ludwig 765 Altura Street Pt. St. Lucie, Florida 34952 Gene S. Gant Beth A. Gant 1207 White Oak Lane Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: proposed shopping center on Prima Vista Boulevard/Eckerds PNRD To whom it may concern: Please accept this letter as a pro stand for the bu$1ding of a shopping center on Prima Vista Boulevard. We believe that the building of said center will be an asset to that neighborhood. We make this decision having lived in White City for nine years and experiencing the development of new centers in our sma~l community. These centers have added to our community,s image and have only been an asset in our opinion. Sincer~t'y, St. Lucie Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, F1 34982 November 2, 1992 Subject: ECKERD PNRD/ Charl es Grunbaum Prima Vista B1 vd and F1 oresta Dear County Commissioners: My wife and I live near the proposed Eckerd site. We would welcome this project and are in favor of it. It would give us more local shopping and keep us away from US #1 traffic. We also now fill our prescriptions at Eckerds and it would be more convenient for us. It would also give the county more tax income that we need. Pt. ~ Sincerely, ~ ~, Mr. & Mrs. Robert Assad/ 1621S.E. Mistletoe St/ St. Lucie, Florida~4983 November 2, 1992 St. Lucie Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 SUBJECT: Eckerds PRND Zoning Change Charles Grunbaum Prima Vista and Floresta Dear County Commissioners, I own and operate a business and have been a property owner in St. Lucie County for several years. I would like to say that I am in favor of this PNRD and urge that the Commission approve it. It conforms with the St. Lucie County Future Land Guidelines. It will provide an alternative to travelling for elderly residents. St. Lucie County needs the tax revenue. We need to keep our business local. I urge you to approve this request. Thank you, Mr. & Mrs. John DeVivo 1145 S.W. Biltmore Street Pt. St. Lucie, Florida- 34983 November 2, 1992 To: Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Re: PNRD, Eckerds Drug. Prima Vista and Floresta Dear Commissioners, We are in favor and support the Eckerds PNRD. We are current residents of St. Lucie County and business owners. With the recent widening of Prima Vista Blvd it is obvious that this corner would be best used for commercial purposes. Additionally this PNRD would give us additional tax revenues and create additional jobs. Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. Sal Conte 2957 S.E. Aba Street Pt. St. Lucie, FL ~ 4t 1 North U.S, 1 P,O, ~ox 998 Ft, Pierce, FL 34954-0998 (407) 4~1,3250 November 3, 1992 r'~ South Beach 221 South Ocean Drive It. Pierce, FL 3494g.3255 (407) 461.1324 alt;ors I"1 7202 South U.S. 1 Port St, Lucle, FL 34952.1479. (407) 878.3200 ~ 816 Beachland Boulevard P.O, Box 3568 Veto Beach, FL 32964-$568 (407) 231-5449 Jim ~1niX, , Chairman ~, Lucie Board of Commissioners '2300 VirBinia Ave. Ft, Pierce FL 34982 Dear Mr. Minix, PNRD rezou&n$ for Eckerds/ Grunbaum. Prima Vista & Floresta Dr. As a property owner on Prima Vista Blvd, in River Park, I would 1. ike to express my support for the above referenced rezoning. Prima Vista Blvd. continues to be a major east/west artery in the Pore SC. Lucte area. Re~ail use at ma]or intersections(such as Prima Vista & Floresta) is lo~ical, not ~o men~lon potential ~obs and increase in the tax base for ~he county. I hope the board of county commissioners will rule favorably on /2I Since,~ 7ou~;s, Memi:,er:. State, National tnternalionai Real Estate Federation HOMES · RENTALS · RANCHES · FARM LANDS . CONDOS BUILDING LOTS · CITRUS GROVES · HOTELS & MOTELS · APPRAISALS NOyte, THIS OFFERING SUBJECT TO IERIROR~, OMISSIONS, PRIOR SALE, OR WITHORAWAL WITHOUT NOTICE October 29, 1992 St. Lu¢ie County CommiSsion 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Fi 34950 Re: Prima Vista Boulevard and Floresta Rezoning Gentlemen: I am writing ~n support of the petition of Charles Grunbaum for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family, 4du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development). It is my understanding that the site, located at the northeast intersection of Prima ¥~s~a._D-~Yd an~ Flor~esta-is the p~opo~ed site of Eckerd Drug's 8,0'00 + square foot'stor~ and additional retail space. As the owner of a three lot parcel at the southeast intersection of Prima vista and Airosa I would, l%ke to support this petition as not ?nly be%n~ a definite positive for the community, but an l. nevitabil~ty as well. For many years those of us that have been in Port St. Luuie since the 70's watched as the city's government attempted to prevent the growth of another major artery (Tort St. Lucie Boulevard). .... .As citizens jammed city hall proclaiming Port ~t,. Lucie. Boulevard as a residen{ial street "forever"; o~ty officials rejected but never prevented the alteration to commercial. The city's refusal to plan for the transition and react on a timely basis resulted in serious consequences to many citizens who were duped into buying houses "chea~" with promises they were safe from commercial development because the caty would neve rezone. These same people, some who never.wanted ~he boulevard commercial and others who purchased homes wzth promises of "never", ]ammed city hall complaining about traffic noise and fumes, trash being thrown in yards, transients roamining the "neighborhood" and crime increasing. What was the city to do then? The answer was to rezone to commerciai.'Only, then there were serious problems. Small lots next to residences. Residences that didn't have enough ].and to build even a small office with sufficient parking and those poor people who purchase~ homes believing the "never" promises. st. Lucie County has an oppor.tunity to prevent delays that will only add to the problem of ~rlma Vista Boulevard. As the older homes are sold and need replacing there is no need to encourage the building of new residential .homes with the m. isleadi_n~ im?remsion tha~. county government w~ll protect this boulevar~ as a "neaghborhood =0mmunity" formver. i en?ourage yo.u, ?o meet your responsi,bility, even in the face of posslble 6pposition from those who ~on t want .to see the change. If ~e are to learn a lesson, from the city.'s h. andling of Port S~. Lu¢ie Boulevard; the county will face the ~nevitable now and plan for a professional and beautiful commercial boulevard. Thank you for allowing me to voice'my opinion on this issue. Connie E. Bishop 7684 Wyldwood Way Port St. Lucie, Florida (407-466-5627) ro o, sox E757 FORT PI£RC:Et FLORIDA 34954, - ::>7§? DEAN, MEAD & MINTON ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 1903 SOUth 25th STrEEt SUITE 200 FORT t~IERCEt FLORIDA 34947 (407) 4~,4- 7700 (407) 562- ??oo FAX (40?) 464'7877 November 9, 1992 Commissioner James A. Minix Chairman St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 23,00 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34949 Re: Petition of Charles Grunbaum for Preliminary Planned Non-Residential Development approval for Eckerd Drugs-River Park Dear Commissioner Minix: As a member of the St. Lucie County-Planning and Zoning Commission, I participated in a hearing and vote in connection with the above-captioned matter on September 24, 1992. At that hearing, the vote was 4 to 3 in favor of the Petition. I have enclosed a copy of a portion of the approved minutes from the above-referenced meeting which indicates that my vote in opposition, as well as those of Mr. McCain and Mr. Sattler, were solely based on the limitation on hours of operation imposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. You can see that all 3 negative votes would have been positive votes without this limitation. Please note that I am not writing to you on behalf of the Planning and Zoning Commission, but rather as a member of the Commission. My intention is to clarify for you that, despite what appears to be a close vote, the vote at the Planning and Zoning Commission was strongly in favor of the proposed development. iN ORLANDO DEAN~ J~,EAD, EGERTON, BLOODWORTh, CAPOUANO ~, BOZARTH, P.A. · TELEPHONE {407} ~,41' frO0 D.EAN MEAD IN BREVARD COUNTY DEAN, MEAD, SP{ELVOGEL (~ GOLDMAN TELEPHONE {407) z~53- 2333 TELEPHONE (at07} E59' 8~00 Commissioner James Minix Chairman St. Lucie County BOard of County Commissioners November 9, 1992 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call at your convenience. Very truly yours, Klein RNK:lps cc: Commissioner Culpepper (w~encl) Commissioner Trefel~er (w/encl~) Commissioner Kreiger (w/ehcl.) Commissioner Fenn (w/encl.) Cynthia Angeles (w/encl.) (via telefax) D~n McIntyre, Esq. (w/en61.) David Kelly (w/encl.)w' Butch Terpening (w/encl.) c: \wp51\l trs. r n k\99993 l sr. 02c Mr. Skidmore stated that he would amend his motion regarding the sign lighting if Ms. Cal. abrese 'did not object. He. stated th. at in a residential neighborhood he could understand people Objecting to a large sign being on after 11:00 P.M. at nigh~. There was no response from Ms. Cal'abrese. Mr. Carman stated that the motion should'be left as stated. Upon roll call Ms. Allen, Mr. Carman, Mr. Skidmore, Mr. Flowers and Ms. Calabrese voted, in favor of the motion. Mr. Sattler, Mr. McCain, and Mr. Klein voted against the motion. Chairman Terpening abstained fromvoting' Chairman Terpening informed the agent for the petitioner that his petition would be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the recommendation of approval with the folloWing three conditions: · With the exception of Fuel and Ice Dealers, only retail uses which are permitted in Neighborhood commercial zoning shall be allowed in the PNRD; and 2. That the ~applicant must provide staff with a legal description' sPecifying the limits of Phase I prior to Final PNRD approval; and 3. Eckerd's hours of operation shall be from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday and from 9:00 A.M. to'6:00 P.M. on Sundays. Mr. Klein stated that he would like it noted in the record that he voted against the motion because of limiting the hours of operation. He further stated that he is in favor of the change in zoning as recommended by staff. Mr. McCain stated that he would concur with Mr. Klein's comment, he stated that this Board should not get so totally with limiting the hours of operations on the petitions that are heard. There are extenuating circumstances such as holidays~ hurricanes, etc. He stated that he was in favor of the rezoning, but not the limitation on the hours of business. Mr. Sattler stated that in all the letters he had read and the comments made by concerned citizens, he felt the-major concern was the added traffic situation and not the hours of operation. He stated that he had voted against the motion because of the limitation on the business hours. He stated that he was in favor of the change in zoning. A break was taken at 9:00 P.M. The hearing reconvened at 9:12 P.M. 14 DATE: F A X # (407) 468--1735 TRANSMZSSZoN CO..VSR FORM TO: FAX # A~ TTN: RE: DIRECTOR TERRy L. VIRTA. AICP NO. OF PAG S- NT SENDER. (.INCL. COVER). _~~ PHONE: ~RT L . F£NN. DisrrictDireCtor:NO. ~ ejUDY(407)CULPEPPER.468_ '/5902300 DistriCtvirgin ioC°Un~N°'B 2Avenueil~Adm~nisrroror ~ JACK .... KRIEGER_~ Fort~ J~EsDisrri~Pterce,. vN°*cHiSHO~FLO. R. DALE TREFELNER. Disrnct' No 4 ~ JIM MtNIx. Disrri~ No 5 u,,o,ng: (407) 468- ~ 553 34982-5652 - - Zoning: (407) 468. J55~ ~ Co~e Enforcement: (407) 468- J57j ~ Plonning: (407) 468- ~ 576 PO~T ST. LUCIE TELEPHONE NO. (407) 878-4898 COiV]IVlUNII'¥ DEVELOP~V~ENT 30 ]~'NAGF_. 8 PT. ST, LUCI:E, FLORIDA 34952 NOVESIBER 4., 1992 JIM MINiX, CHAIRMAN ST. LUCIE COUIFI"f COMMISSIONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34982 RE: PNRD/ECKERDS DRUG/CHARLES GRL~BAUM PRIlv~ VISTA & FLORESTA ' DEAR MR. MINIX; I AM A RESIDENT OF RIVER P~ARK /LN'D LIVE DIRECTLY' ACROSS FROM THE AREA IN QUESTION. I HEARTILY APPROVE THE REZONING IN QUESTION. IT WILL BE A PLUS TO THE VALUES HERE. THE ROADWAY USED AS AN ART~'RY, EAST TO US %1 AND WEST TO I95 AND IS NO LONGER CONDUCIVE TO RESIDENTIAL USE. ' t RECOMMEND THAT YOU APPROVE T~E ZONING CHANGE. THANK · J r r KU~'~'' I'IRHR~'- ~IENT OF F I CE NOU-E~6-i992 10:48 PRor,1 JOHN KNAPP INSURANCE TO 468175 TO 4617615 P.05 NOVEMBER 6, 1992 ~OARD OF COUN'Ty COMMISSIONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVE FORT PiERC~, FL 34947 ~: ECKERD DKUG/C~kRLE$ GRb?fBAUM ~R CO,MMtS STONERS: Th:is let:er is wri:ten in support of the above mentioned. believe Eckerds to be an asset there fOrtothe local co~ni~y givingPr°Ject'=he !o~al residents a more convenient place Purchase dai~y will b, less driving for elderly residents nece~$itie~. other re~ident~s in area. Again, I am in support of the proposed pro3ect I f~el Be an asse~ for the local community. . Eckerds would 11/09/1992 12:58 FROM MRNR6tF~'¢'~ENT OFFICE TO 46817.]5` NOVEMBER 4, 1992 Ellis H. McKissick 4816 Sunset Blvd. Indian River Estates, F1 34982 Sub3ect: Eckerd Drug PNRD Rezoning Prima V~sta & Floresta M_~. Minix, Chairman St. Lucie County Board of County Corr~issioners 2300 V~rginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, F1 34982 Dear Mr.. Chairman and All Comm2ssioners; My Mother.owns a house on Prima Vista Blvd And I live nearby in Indian River Estates. in the interest of mY Mother and the local, residents in the area being effected by the above~zonfn9 change, I would like to voice a couple of obvious points ~n favor of the zoning chan~e. a) It would offer area residents the option of neighborhood-shopping wit-hout having to travel to US $1 ~ b) The project falls in tine with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Future Land Use plan for Neighborhood Coramercial Zoning c) PNRD Zoning provides for and protects the community from any uses that do not conform. I ask the Board of County Commissioners to approve the zoning change. Thank you for your time and consideration, Sincerely, is H. McKissick F'.04 FROH MAH~ '~'"iI'~ENT OFFICE TO 4681 P.02 ealt:ors 411 North U.S. 1 P.O. Box 998 Ft. Pierce, FL 34954-0998 (407) 461-3250 November 3, 1992 D South Beach 221 South Ocean Drive Ft. Pierce, FL 34949-3255 (407] 461-1324 Jim Mini. x , Chairman St. Lucie Board of Commissioners 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce FL 34982 Dear Mr. Minix-, r-~ 7~02 south u.s~ 1 D 816 Beachland Boulevard Port St., ~JP~J:-,,L~_-:- :-.- - ....... .J~x 3568 (407) 871 0 V - ach FL 32964-3568 CO~qUNiTY DEVELOB~EN~ Re: PNRD rezoning for Eckerds/ Grunbaum. Prima Vista & Fl°testa Dr. As a property owner on Prima Vista BlVd. in River Park, I would like to express my support for'the above referenced 'rezoning. Prima Vista Blvd. continues to be a major ea:st/west artery in the Port St. Lucie area. Re,ail uSe at major, intersections(such as Prima Vista & Floresta) is logical, not to mention potential jobs · and increase in the tax base for the county. I hope the board of county commissioners will rule favorably on this request. Member: State-National International Real Estate Federation HOMES · RENTALS · RANCHES · FARM LANDS · 'CONDOS BUILDING LOTS · CITRUS GROVES · HOTELS & MOTELS - APPRAISALS' NOTE: THIS OFFERING SUBJECT TO ERRORS, OMISSIONS, PRIOR SALE, OR WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT NOTICE REALTOR® Board of County Commissioners~ St. Lucie, Florida 2.300 virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 Jim Minix, Chirman 352 E. PRIMA VISTA BLVD. PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA' 34983 File No. RZ 92-008 Dear Mr. Minix: This is in reference to your letter dated' October 26, 1992 concerning the Change in zoning from RS-4 To PNRO Lots 31, 32, 33~ 34, and 35 Block 39 River Park Subdivision Unit 4, St. Lucie County Florida. We own the property located at 352 East Prima Vista'Blvd. across the .Street from the said property, our proPerty decreased in value when the Street was Widened to five lanes and one way you can bring the v'alue of our property back up is to approve the zoning change for Eckerd drUgs. We are senior citizens and we feel we should have some covenient shop- ping clOse by wher.e we won't have to drive to US 1 every time we need a small item. We ask you to'please approve the zoning change as it will benifit the whole neighborhood. sincerely, Charles Grunbaum 2513 S. Federal Highway Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 November 6, 1992 David Kelly St. Lucie County Planning & Zoning 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Re: Eckerds PNRD Charles Grunbaum Prima Vista/Floresta Dear Mr. Kelly; Attached are new favorable letters supporting the PNRD. Sincerely, from CHARLES GRUNBAUM St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virg. inia Ave Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Nov. 2nd, 1992 Dear Sirs: My Name is Guido Chibas and I have been a resident of St. Lucie County since 1972. My wife and I have been living in Port St. Lucie since 1980. I'am presently a homeowner on Prima Vista Blvd. between Rio Mar and U.S.1. I am for controled growth and zoning changes on Prima Vista Blvd. My reasons for this are: 1: I have 3 small children and the widening of the blvd. has cre- ated faster moving traffic. It is definitely not a residential area any longer, to bring up children. 2: The proposed project and any other future projects will have~a positive effect on property values as long as it is a PNRD zoning or Professional type class zoning. 3: With 1-95, U.S.1. and the METS stadium traffic, the Blvd. will and is becoming a major thoroughfare to the east and west .... Guido Chibas Oct~ber 29, 1992 LuCie county commission virginia Avenue ' e ~1 34950 p~erc , Prima Vista Boulevard and Floresta Rezoning Grunbaum Gentlemen: Charles am writing in suppor= of the Retit.ia°f in zoning ~rom RS-4 (Res~dent~ , Single Family, 4~u/a¢) to O~ (Planned Non. Residential Development) · northeast at the -~ -'~ a vi-sis ~!Y~ =" - ' - ' aadit~ona1 retail . ~ pr~m "'+ square ~oot store and o:E EcKera u~ ' ' southeast intersection space. As the owner o~ a three lot parcel at the . · not prima vista and Airosa ! would like to support ~only being a definite positive Zor ~he ~inevi~abilitY as well. For many years those o{ us that have been in por~ St. Lucie since the 70's watched as the city's government a=tempted %o prevent growth of another major artery (~ort St. Lucie Boulevard)- . - - ~ v,ucie nted the . . ct on a % ~ o bu er revs ana rea =ea ~nt . ~e ,,-~.=n" w~th pro~ ..... .~ ,,. vet' rezone ~evelop~n~ , the boulevard oo~roial  ese same p~op _.~ homes wz=n ~'"- . ~?.--- +_~ash being city hall compla~n~. ~" s roamining the ,,neighborhood" an6 crime %brown in yar~S, transient The answer was . s'Lng What was the city =o ~o then~ ' s problems. ~ncrea · · isl.-Only, then there were ser~ou rezone to . .t~at aidn'% have enough - lots n =~c~ Small . mall cZ , · the ,,never" promises. to build _even a ~___~ ~mes bel~ev~n~ pOOr people w~ has an opportunity to preven~ delays %hat will . oulevard. As the older county Vista B a e St. Lucie .... ~~ o~ ~rxma ....... d ~o enoour only a~a to the ~=~r"l_-%~n~ there ~s n~ homes are sold and nee~ ~--- ~ . ' h =he misleading impression ..... · nt~al homes w~_ . boulevard as a .,,neighborhood uo~m,- .... - even in the face of f I encourage Y°R ~o meet our responsibilitY, change. I ~hose who don't wan= to see the possible6ppositi°n from handling of ~ort S~. Lu¢ie ..___ ~ inevitable now and plan ~or a are to learn a lesson from the city's Bo. t_2_ia~ an~ beaUtzful oommerozal boulevard. Thank you for allowing me to voice my opinion on this issue Connie E. Bash 9 7684 Wyldwood Way Port St. Lucie, plorida (407-466-5627) St. Lucie Board of County Commissioners .~300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, F1 34982 Noven~ber 2, 1992 Subject: ECKERD PNRD/ Charles Grunbaum Prima Vista Blvd and Floresta iDear County Commissioners: My wife and I live near the proposed Eckerd site. We would ~welcome this project and are in favor of it. It would give us more local shopping and keep us away from US #I traffic. We also now fill our prescriptions at Eckerds and it would be more convenient for us. It would also give the i county more tax income that we need. /~ Sincerely, ~ Mr. & Mrs. Robert Assad/ 1621 S.E. Mistletoe St/___ Pt. St. Lucie, Florida ~4983 992 iD: 48 FROh JO~4N KNAPP INSURANCE TO 6~ i~92 COUNTY CO~MIS$IONERS IA AVE PIERCE, FL ~947 : ECKERD DRUG/CHiA/~LE$ G~.UMBA~ COMMISSIONERS: This letter is wri: in support o~ the ~bove mentioned project. I Eckerds to be an, ;e~ there for the local ¢ommqni~y glv~n$ the es d~ivi~g f~!! l~erly ~,siden~s and I am in suD~or~ of the proposed pro3ect I fmet gckerds would et for th~ ioC~ii~ communi=y. November 2, 1992 St. Lucie Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 SUBJECT: Eckerds PRND Zoning Change Charles Grunbaum Prima Vista and Floresta Dear County Commissioners, I own and operate a business and have been a property owner in St. Lucie County for several years. I would like to say that I am in favor of this PNRD and urge that the Commission approve it. It conforms with the St. Lucie County Future Land Guidelines. It will provide an alternative to travelling for elderly residents. St. Lucie County needs the tax revenue. We need to keep our business local I urge you to approve this request. ' Thank you, Mr. & Mrs. John DeVivo 1145 S.W. Biltmore Street Pt. St. Lucie, Florida. 34983 Nove~.ber 2, 1992 COUNTY COmmISSION BOARD OF' ST. LUCIE COUNTY 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE, F~ORTDA 34982 KE: ECKERD DRUG PNRD Ploresta and Pri~a Vista I am a resident of St...Lu¢ie County. Pmi~a Vista Boulevard is not a place for .new residential homes. It serves as a major traffic road for residents going north to Fort Pierce, east to US .% 1, or west t~ I~5. · do a~rove o~. the retail zoning for t'~is'~orner.. It wou.~d improve the area by bringing more business opportunities to the area, increass the reven~e ~1~waud create so~e ad~itoi~a'! jobs for our residents. I.wo'uld ask tha'~ the comm~ss£on approve this ~ha~ge. November 3, 1992 St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Re: Eckerds PNRD/ Charles Grunbaum Prima Vista & Floresta The purpose of this letter is to recommend that you approve the "Eckerds" PNRD. It will be an asset to the community to have -~a business like this. We can use more neighborhood businesses to provide basic services. This corner is not suitable for residential purposes. Yours Truly, Mr. & Mrs. Wally Ludwig 765 Altura Street Pt. St. Lucie, Florida 34952 Ft Pieroe, FL 34954.0gg8 (407) 461-3250 Nove,,ber 3, 1992 8outh Beach 221 South Ocean Drive Ft. Pierce, FL 3494g.3255 (407} 461,13,?.4 S 7202 South u,S. 1 Port St. Luote, FL 341)52-1479. (407) 87'8-3200 816 Beach~ancl Boulevard P.O. Box 3,568 Veto Beach, FL 32964-3568 {407) 231-5449 Jim ~tniX.', Chairman St. Lucie Board o£ Commissioners '2300 Virginia Ave. Re: PN~D rezonlng for Eckerds/ Ft. Pierce FL 34982 Grunbaum. Prima Vista & Floresta Dr. Dear Mr. Min,ix, As a PrOperty owner on Prima Vista Blvd. in River Park, t would like to express my support for the above referenced rezonin2. Prima Vista Blvd. continues to be a major east/west artery in the Por~ St. Lucte area. Re,ail use at major intersections(such as Prima Vista & Floresta) is lo$ical, not to mention potential ~obs~ and increase in the tax base for she county. thlsI hope~equest.the board of county commissioners will rule favorably on incer.~l~you~s, //~ /;'/' .. Member: State, National International Real Estate Federation HOMES · RENTALS · RANCHES · FARM LANDS , CONDOS BHILDING LOTS · CITRUS OROVES · HOTELS & MOTELS · APPRAISALS NOTE: THIS OFFERING SU~4~C.T TO ERROR~, OMISSIONS, PqRIOR SAL~. OR WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT NOTICE .............................. ... G I"','.?.) t c hen Gt-*een 55,."':,(5 O i eande~-- Avenue Wh i t e C i t y ,., F i c) i.', i d a 54982 St,, Lucie Cour:ty Bc, a~.-d o¥ County Commissione~.,s 2300 '- ~ · ., i ;'*Bin'ia Avenue Ft,, Pie~-ce.~ FL ~4982 IRe: Pr-lea:."..,. ~ st".a' BI "'"'-~/: -.~ Fioresta F'it . -.-,~'.e!"'ds Di"'uq PNRD- Char-!e-.-2.,. G~'unbaum Dea,** i~]~'. Mini:...,, and Commissioner. s; As a t'"esident o¥ St,, L.ucie County but bein;B a new come,,., to this ar. ea i -~:eei that an c'-~-.-,=,.-.d~ · at~.,r, the above mentioned lor'.~'"'ion__. '-- · - . ]'h.~_ r'oad '-=.e~*ve.=_ a.=.._ a '-,,'-,~'ouBhYar-e to 'the east .as ~...~e!! as "the wes~ and it WoLi~d riot make sense to build ._--:ny ,~*esidentiai hou. sin~ on th'is poad at this tim. e c,~', anytime in the ¥,'.-~.tL:~'e. ~ecaL~.sm one o¢ one,,· two .- ·-~= uni,.~ue statL.,.S as ' ' '*;~ - majo~'* access r'oads to the wes'~er-n pa~,t o~ Pt. St,. Lucie as time Boes on the t:.*a4.;6ic use wili only inc,.ease. Good piannin9 dictates that this a~-ea be ~'*ezoned in the best inte~*ests o~ the nei~hbo~-hood and the PNRD will de¢initely accomplish that. i aPpt,*ove the PNRD and r'ecommend ' · November 2, 1992 To- Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Re: PNRD, Eckerds Drug. Prima Vista and Floresta Dear Commissioners, We are in favor and support the Eckerds PNRD. We are current residents of St. Lucie County and business owners. With the recent widening of Prima Vista Blvd it is obvious that this corner would be best used for commercial purposes. ~ Additionally this PNRD Would give us additional tax revenues and create additional jobs. Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. Sal Conte 2957 S.E. Aba Street Pt. St. Lucie, FL Gene S. Gant Beth A. Gant 1207 White Oak Lane Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: proposed shopping center on Prima Vista Boulevard/Eckerds PNRD To whom it may concern- Please accept this letter as a pro stand for the bu$1ding of a shopping center on Prima Vista Boulevard. We believe that the building of said center will be an asset to that neighborhood. We make this decision having lived in White City for nine years and experiencing the development of new centers in our sma-l:l community. These centers have added to our community3s image and have only been an asset in our opinion. Sincer61y, Ge S. Ga eth A.. Gait ST. L. UC!E BOARD OF COUNTY C{3FiMiSSIONERS .............. - UF::. .,"=T. F"] i:'lq~F.'r.:-FL -'?zl DEAR COMMISSiONERS~ bJE ARE ST ' '~F"=E -- · - L.u_-z COiJNTY Rb.::51DENTS LIVING AT :,"..=.'""~2 S,E SAXONY i i~ '"; . ~ i .... i"' "F "- TM T" ' ..... .. r"OF:T ST L~t..,'rE .ri,z: RE,'_ON -" " ~' ' .,r4G PROF'F]:?,En F-'QR THE ECKERD WOU:...L.', 'F.:.r. A PLUS c-.pr~, "r',~- -'- ,' '-::'~ , r,.:. COi".'!i¥1UN i Tv THE Lf]CAL RES :[ ...... ur-r-.iTS W 'r.. ~_L.-~ .~4A'.._.; ~... THE BENEFIT OF' LOCAL SHOPPING FOR HA, NY OF' T 4E*:-' I'-' "'~"- "- ~. ~. BAS -':DS ,_I--F]h:'ERD DF;.:UGS TS A bJEt._* F.:r_c.,r- cF:TEn':'-'"'*-, ~.-: .... - .I.; ~..,. j~. - ,-- ,'::,U.miNESS AND WILL COMP_! ZHENT THE C:OMMUN i TY,, WE DEm.T. N T TEL. Y SE!:--. n,' ~RqE~ ; ;c',."* - F'F1TEj*4T--', I Al.. t"*I~,,_,._¢;~--."FO~'I~R,. ,~..,,, ' '" ~-"- .......... ~-.:.) A~ THE Fh:rqF:'~:'F'Ty LOCAT'""";' ..... z,..,lq DOLES N~'qT LFND iTSELF F-:,:FS I =') ,- ,, , -r- .... '--7,_?,,' V NEzLL T,-, ~-, ~:r,,: :[ AL U"-'"- S 'r ~'..,-"~: , · - ~ " ii-'- .... .. .... :.":: DEN :[ NG OF I FiE ROAD, WE : '"' ~Hvc. NO OBJECTION "FO 'THE REZON'rNG OF "['HIS PROPERTY AND - t r~. ,' YOU Ar-~-,x_ v~. ']"HE PROJECT, S I NCEREL. Y.~ "-'" - ? '~': ~ J ~' r.:,? l::: ~' CO~UNtTY DEVELOP .~ENT ST. L,,~d~j~.5.~, C~O, F_ _~ L ....... DON & NORMA BRANDENBURG 352 E. PRIMA VISTA BLVD. PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA ~34983 NOVEMBER 2, 1992 Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie, Florida 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 Jim Minix, Chirman File No. RZ 92-008 Dear Mr. Minix: This is in reference to your letter dated October 26, 1992 concerning the change in zoning frOm RS-4 To PNRO Lots 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 Block 39 River Park Subdivision Unit 4, St. Lucie County Florida. We own'the property located at' 352 East Prima Vista Blvd. across the Street from the said property, our property decreased in value when the Street was widened to five lanes and one way you can bring the value of our property back up is to approve the zoning change for Eckerd drugs. We are senior citizens and we feel we should have some covenient shop- ping'clOse by where we won't have to drive to US 1 every time we need a small item. We ask you to please approve the zoning change as it will benifit the whole neighborhood. sincerely, . NorI~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONeRS October'26, 1992 COMMUNITY DeVeLOPMeNT ADMINISTRATOR TERRY L. VIRTA, AICP In compliance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code you are hereby advised that Charles Grunbaum has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family. 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) to seek Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs for the following described property: Lots 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 in Block 39 of the Subdivision entitled "River Park Unit Four" as recorded in Plat Book 11 on Page 9 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. (Location: Northeast corner of Floresta Avenue and PrimaVista Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, Florida) The Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on this petition at 9:00 A.M. on Tuesday, November 10, 1992 in St. Lucie County Commission Chambers, third floor of County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. If you should have any questions, additional information may be obtained by calling Area Code 407, 468-1593, and referencing the File Number found below. South county residents may call toll-free 878-4898, and then ask for extension 1593. Sincerely, aOAaO CO g SS O eS ~r.. LUCIE COUN. TY, FLORIDA 00 HAVERT L F:-~N, District No I ® JUDY CULPEPPE · = ' 8 ' · R, District No. 2 ® JACK KRIEGER, District No. 3 ® R. DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX, District No. 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administrator: (407) 468-1590 · Growth Management: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407) 468-1576 _,~ Property Acquisitions: (407) 468-1720 · Codes Compliance: (407) 468-1571 ~" PORT ST. LUCIE'TELEPHONE NO. (407) 878-4898 . l'l e Stu ,x- ;'News and ..... The Port St. Lucic News, (a,, edition, of Tl,e Stuart Nears) STATE OF FLORII)A COUNTY OF MAI.II'IN: COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE: PRITCtlARD Who o,, oath says that he/she ACCTS REC MANAOER · ,, of The 8tt, al-t News, a~ld 'The Port St, Lucie Hews, a dai{y ~lemvs pa per {'u{){ished at .Stuart {,~ Marti,~ Gou,~ty, F{orida, th.t the attaCh~d~copy of advertise,Hell't, bei~ a ST. LUCIE C T Y ~7:? 7 ~~ OF~ cO~ C~TSSIO~ P~LIC ~NG AG~A - .-; ~1 the Hlatter of~ C~ES 'GR~A~ ZONING C~~ Before the undersig,]ed authority appeared KATHL~gN H. i:: the . :i Court, was I't,l.lisl,ed 1,~ Tim Stuart News and The Port ;St. Lucie Ne%rs ill the issues of. OCT. 20, 1992 Marti. County. Florida, m:d St, I.t, Cie Gou~lty, i the said newspapers have heretofore bee. col,ti,, in said Marti. Cou,~ty, FlOrida a distri Florida and St. Lueie Gou~ next preeedi.g the first. of th advertisement; and affianti paid nor promised a,:y perso~, 'm or corl rebate, eOlllmission or refu~md advertisement for publication he said NmVs has bee~ entered as ~ Ohms n~ in Stuart. Martin County, FlOrida; a~d Ft. County. Florida and has been for ,d preceding the first ~tio. of advertisement. o,, in ~ a,:d that Iml, lished ed i~ M , Goun.ty, I of one year ~]either : iSeOUllt, illg this ~e post office St; Lueie year next copy of- ST.. I.UCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUN'i~f COMMiSSiONERS ::lO, t992 . - . _ in ac- With Section 'l 1.00.03 of ;;/u~ Counly tOad.Devel0p. { ~e/aad .~nacc~once with ~ions ~fthe s( L~e'Coun- {tuO~':=~~. B~rd of Coun~ '~mm~ners ' c°nsid~ ;~eir "":'"'~ "' q ~ :?, '..' ' Pub.: Oct:'~O, t992. ~:, ;, .' 7" Transmit Conf'irn-la±.inn I;;.~efT, S't P.-.': e ~-: e J~ ',,,,' 8 r-' ' 7 f~ -.,.'" "-:' "':' - .., ~141 "-:' 6 Tr-',~.ns;rr, i ±.+..er c,[ ....... . ,:-'l-lr'dr',i F' ,Bt t; e ' I]i c 'f, 1 =';- 9 "-" _ -~ ._.,, _ = I '_1 '2¢, T J. m e ' 0 J. ' .,::'-;', ~:-/ FI o .J u ~'.,] o r-' m P a !q e s ' 0 2 R e :s u. 1% ' 0 E F A X # (407) 468-1735 TRANSMISSION COVER FORM DATE: NO. OF SENDER ~OMMEN~S.: DIRECTOR TERRY L. VIRTA, AtCP . HAVERI' L FENN. District No I e JUDY CULP£PPER, DistriCtcounryNo. 2Administrator · JACK KRIEGER._ JAMEsDiStriCtv.N°'cHiSHOLM3 · R. DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 · JIM MINIX District No. 5 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Director: (407) 468-1590 e Building: (407) 468-1553 · Planni'ng; (407) 468-1576 Zoning: (407) 468-1553 e Code Enforcement: (407) 468-1571 PORT ST. LUCIE TELEPHONE NO. (407) 878-4898 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA NOVEMBER 10, 1992 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby i g yen in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1) Petition of Charles Grunbaum for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non- Residential Development) to seek Preliminar~ and Final Development Plan apPrOval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs for the following described property: 2) Lots 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 in Block 39 of the Subdivision entitled "River Park Unit Four" as recorded in Plat Book 11 on Page 9 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Boulevard,(L°cati°n: Northeastport St. Lucie,C°rner FL)°f Floresta Avenue and Prima Vista Petition ~f America,s Family Golf-S orts C ~a]or adjustment to a ~,~ ,~ _enter Inc., for a uevelopment) known as Treao,,~'~__~anned Non-Residential ~ ~ ~nuamusement Center for the following described property: The South 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 24, Township 35 South, Range 39 East, less right of way for Public Roads, said parcel lying in St Lucie County, Florida. . (Location: Northwest corner of Andrews Avenue and Peters Road intersection) Meeting will be held in the St. Lucie County Commission 'ChamberS, third floor of County Administration Building Annex, 2300 zrglnla Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on November 10, 1992 beginning at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and th may need to ens ~ _ __~ ~ _. at, for such ur os . made, which ~uf~e ~t~~ v~na~lm record of the ~ ~~-~ ~e the appeal is to be based, ne testzmony and evzGence upon which PUBLISH DATE: OCTOBER 20, 1992 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ JIM MINIX, CHAIRMAN ST, LUCIE COUNTY AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE I· · do hereby certify that as Agent for the St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners on the following described property: GRUNBAUM. CHARLES NORT_HEAST CORNER OF PRIMA VISTA_BLVD? & FLORESTA DR. _(SEE ATTACHED. MAP~ (NEEDS_TO BE_U? BY 9-9-_92~ I did on , 19~, erect in a conspicuous place on this property the following notice: REZONING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON THIS PROPERTY FROM RSr4 TO PNRD WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, ON ~ 9-2~-92 . BEFORE THE ZONING BOARD, ROOM 101, AND ON 10-27,92 BEFORE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON THE 3RD FLOOR ANNEX, COMMISSION CHAMBERS. PETITION AVAILABLE ROOM 201. Signature Date ATTENTION: MIKE BOWERS ~ BOB FRANK ?HIS ~SIGN TO BE PUT UP. PLEASE RETURN A SIGNED AND DATED COpy OF THIS TO SUE HARTZOG - GRONTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION SO IT CAN BE ADDED TO THE FILE. T H A N K Y O . DATE SENT TO ROAD DEPT. ST. LUCIE COUNTY RE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE ~ , do hereby certify that as Agent for the St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners on the following described proper~y: GR~NBAUM, CHARLES NORTHEAST CORNER_OF PRIMA VISTA BLVD.._ &' FLORESTA _DR. _(SEE ATTACHED MAp) (NEEDS TO BE UP BY~'9r92)_ I did on _~~ 19~ erect in a conspicuous place;on this property the following notice: REZONING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON THIS PROPERTY FROM RS-4 _. _ TO PNRD WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 230'0 VIRGINIA AVENUE, 'FORT PIERCE, ON 9-24-92 BEFORE THE ZONING BOARD, ROOM 101, AND ON 10-27-92_ BEFORE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON THE 3RD FLOOR ANNEX, COMMISSION CHAMBERS. PETITION AVAILABLE ROOM 201. Signature Date 57 MEMORANDUM TO: ]FROM DATE TechniCal Services Supervisor Planning and Zoning Secretary~ S ' ~ ~ ~uo±ic Notice for Petition of: UBJECT - Postin~ o .... The above Petition is scheduled for public hearing on the following date: BOARDOFADJUSTMENT.. PLANNING&ZONiNG ..................... BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER ~~= Please~~%/~~implement the posting of public notice by Public Work Bef°re ~ at the following location s BOA-DOCS/BOA . AGN September 23, 1992 St. Lucie County Development Council Advancing Business Opportunities SEP 2 5 1992 Mr. J.p. Terpening, Chairman St. Lucie County Planning &l Zoning Board % P.O. Box 1449 Fort Pierce, FL 34954-1449 Dear Mr. Ter~~ I would like to address an issue the Planning & Zoning Board will consider at its Thursday, September 24th meeting. Unfortunately, do to a prior commitment, I will not be able to present my comments in person Please accept this correspondence in my absence.· Although in this instance I am n__Q~ speaking on behalf of the St. Lucie County Economic Development Council (EDC), I have been outspoken on the need for additional commercial and industrial property in Port St. Lucie. In my opinion, the existing commercial and industrial land use and zoning in Port St. Lucie, including the unincorporated area known as River Park, can not support a build-out population of 250,000. Without property to accommodate business, the City will continue to export its workforce and import its products and services. In addition, without the diversification of the tax base through business investment, the residents of Port St. Lucie and St Lucie County will face continued cuts in services · or both. , increased property taxes As to the specific question of property along Prima Vista, I remain silent. "What is the highest and best use of the significantly affect the character of the are~p,.r ~rty?", "Will a change acceptable?" are a few of the ~est~ ........ a~°~Is a change politically ~ ~un~ ~na~ nee~ answered before the issue can be resolved. Although my experience tells me that property is worth more when zoned commercial rather than residential, the value of the property may not be a critical factor in this case As a result, I am not able to offer an opinion. · Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in this matter. Sincerely, A1 Rivett Executive Director CC: Terry Virta, Community Development Administrator, St. Lucie County James Lawless, Mayor, City of Port St. Lucie Don Cooper, City Manager, City of Port St. Lucie Patty Tobin, Planning Director, City of Port St. Lucie Cynthia Angelos, President, Greater Port St. Lucie Chamber of Commerce Les Hargrave, Executive Vice President, Greater PSL Chamber of Commerce 900 Vi~inia Ave., Suite 16, Fort Pierce, FL 34982 (407) 460-6700 · 1-800-532-0099 · FAX (407) 460-6701 9.22.1992 15:19 HA~OU3 H~ (~OLDbt~N, 0~-OOUNSEI., Li01~Ntl, BQ, {N F~ORI, DA AI',JI3 ROY T, MILDNER CAROLYN V. KOWALSKI GOLDMAN, BRUNiNG ATTORNEY~ AT ~AW ANQ FINANCE BUILDING 10~70 SOUTH U,S. HIGHWAy ONE FAX TRANSMITTAL L~-TTI~R P. 1 (401'} 878-4700 (407J, $35-8332 (-407) 335.8359 PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES IMMEDIATELY TO: NAME: David Kelly - St. Lucie Cotmty Planning FAX NUMBER CALLED: 468-1735 DATE: 9/22/92 FROM: Cynthia G. Angelos FAX NUMBER IS: (407) 335-8359 GENERAL OFFICE NUMBER I$: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES IS 4 (407) 878-4?00 or 335-8332 ___ (INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL LETTER) IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES PLEASE CALn OUR OFFICE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE . ' --- PECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: CL I ENT: FILE NO: Eckerd 92-0329 ~FROM GBR 4(~?-335-8359 9-. 22. 1992 15:20 ~/' I. AW OFFtC:~;.~i OF (~OLDMAN, BRUNING & ANGELOS, P.A-, ATTORNgY$ A~ LAW LAW AND ~INA~CE BUILDING ~ORT ~t, LUCi~. FLORIDA P. 2 September 22, 1992 :Dennis Murphy, Land Development Manager St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34930 Re: Eckerd Drug PNRD Floresta Drive Dear Dennis: Confirming our telephone conversation of today and that of my letter of August 1t, 1992 (a copy of which is enclosed herewith) we have been working under the understanding that the referenced PNRD would be heard by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners on NovemDer 10, 1992. It appears that this hearing date was inadvertently scheduled for October 27, 1992, however, as I previously indicated, it will be impossible for me and my client to attend this hearing due to other commitments. Accordingly, it will be necessary that the hearing be scheduled as originally requested for November 10, 1992, Based on our discussion today, it is our understanding that the Public Hearing has not yet been advertised, and that there should be no problem in this regard. Thank you so much for your assistance. Again, as stated in my letter of August il, 1992, should there be any deviation whatsoever from the above schedule please contact this office. Based on our conversation we shall advise our cl!ent that the hearing is scheduled for November 10 1992 as originally anticipated. ' Very truly yours, GOLD~JLN, BRUNING & ANGELOS, P.A. irn~hia G'. ~gelos CGA/cm Enclosure _ . ~,FROM GB~ ~07-335-835~ 9.22. ]992 15:28 AN, BRUN.ING & ANGEL~ '~;' ~.A. A~O~N~Y~ AT ~Aw ~0~70 ~UTH U~, HIGHWAY ONE P. 3 August ii, 1992 ~ DELIVERI~ _ Dennis Murphy, hand Development Manager St. Lucia County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 Re: Eckerd Dz-ag PNRD Floresta and Alroso Dear Dennis: Confirming our meeting of July 28, 1992 and pursuant thereto we have enclosed the applicable applications pertaining to the referenced matter. We have also enclosed checks totaling $3,500.00 for the submission of said applications as set forth below. .As you are aware, these applications are being submitted at this time in anticipation of a heartn~ schedule in which they would be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board on OctOber 22, 1992 and final review of this PNRD by th~ Board of County Commissioners on November 10, i992. Should this hearing schedule deviate whatsoever from the above please contact us immediately. . The applications enclosed and associated fees are as follows: 1. Site: Development Plan Application and Petition for Change in Zoning - $1,500.O0 (which covers both Preliminary & Final PNRD approval) 2. Certificate of Capacity APplication - $400.00 3. Application for Vegetation Removal - $I00.00 4. Construction Plan Review - $1,~00.00 The timing of this project is very important to our client and accordingly it is imperative'that the fi'nal'approval be reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners on November 10, 1992. Should there be any problems whatsoever with this timing, again please notify us. . ~FROM GPA 40?-335-8359 Dennis Murphy August I1, 1992 Pa~e Two 9.22. I992 15:21 P. 4 Thank you so much for you assistant in this matter. We look forward to working with you and your staff on this project. Very trlll'y yours,' GOLDMAN, BRUNING & ANGELOS, P.A. Cynthia G. Angelos CGA/cm cc: Eckerd Dr~g GOLDMAN. I~IRUNING a ANGI-'LO$. P,A. I O~I?O ~OUTI-,I U,~i, HIGHWAY ONI~ · PO~T 87. t.l. ICIl~, I~t..OI~IiDA 34~2 MEMORANDUM TO: Technical Services Supervisor ~FROM: Planning and Zonin9 Secretary.~ SUBJECT:~ Posting of Public Notice for Petition of: The above Petition is scheduled for public hearing on the following date- BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. PLANNING & ZONING ~0~ o~ ~o~~ c0~~ C~~~.~5 //~~~ Ptoaso ~mplomon~ ~ho post~n~ of public not,co b7 Public ~orks  ~ ~ ~ ion: BOA-DOCS/BOA.AGN TO: FROM: DATE: Development Review Committee .Property Acquisition Director September 8, 1992 .SUBJECT: Site Plan - Eckerd Drug,s . . __. _ Prima-Vista Blvd. & . Floresta Blvd In reviewing the above mentioned Site Plan, it appears that the following items 'need ~ to be ~addressed: On Sheet 2 of 7, ~Site Plan, you indicate a 20' Rear Set Back. According..to t~eRestrictive Covenants~of River Park Unit.4 the'foll~wing~s..stated: , '! O ~ · · n~Waterfront Lots, no'/building· and/or enclosed swimming '-p°ols~shall'be'erected--on any part thereof nearer th'an. 25-to the front lot.line, which is abutting the street; nor ·nearer ..to ~he rear lo.t line, whichis the line abutting the.waterway, canal or shore., than 25' nor nearer than 25' feet to a side lot line.let line ~butt~ng a waterway; nor nearer than 10' to any Side On Sheet 3 or 7, Landscape Plan, you indicate landscape along the Ea;terly Boundary of the property. ' According to the Restri tire Covenants of River Park Unit 4 the following is stated~ ' ' , "Within the 6' side -Utility and Drainage Easement, ..no s~ructure, ~lant.ing or other ~.material shall'be, placedi.:or- ~ermitted-.tol . remain 'which may:.: damage-or interfere wi~h ~the nstallatJ, on and maintenance of utilities, or which.' 'may obstruct, retard, or. change the direction of fl°w of drainage channels in the Easements.- On Sheet 4-of 7,~BOundary and Topographic Survey, it appears no indication was made of the following as indicated in the RestriCtive Covenants of River Park Unit 4, the following is Development Review Committee September 8, 1992 Page Two Easements and installation and maintenance of Utilities and. Drainage Facilities are reserved as follows: 6' at the side lot lines and 10' at the rear lot line of each and every lot Ails'~de' lot lines lying adjacent to all streets shall contain' no Easements and where more than one lot is intended as a building site, or where parts or one or more lots are intended as a building site the outside boundaries of said building site shall carry said side Easements.,, If ~o~ have any questions regardin hes±t~te to contact our office. g this matter, please do not J~/~gk · .~. · "cc:~Devel°pment Administrator ~ County Surveyor PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: September 24, 1992 File Number: RZ,92-008 MEMO RAND UM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: From: Date: Planning and Zoning Com. mis~¢n Planning DireCtor~~///( September 15, 1992 Subject: Location: Exiting Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Land Use Designation: Petition of Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) for preliminary and final approval of a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family, 4 alu/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) Northeast corner of Prima Vista Blvd. and Floresta Drive RS,4 (Residential, Single Family, 4 du/ac) PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) RU (Residential Urban) Parcel Size: 1.74 acres Proposed Use: Surrounding Zoning: Surrounding Land Uses: FIRE/EMS Protection: Neighborhood Commercial, Eckerd Drug store (8,600 square feet) and 6,900 square feet of additional retail space RS-4, (Residential, Single Family, 4 du/ac) RS-2, RS-3, RS-5 (City of Port St. Lucie) Existing - Single Family Homes Future - RU (Residential Urban) Future - RL (City of Port St. Lucie) Station #3 (West Prima Vista Blvd.) is approximately one mile away. Utility Service: Water and Sewer by St. Lucie County Utilities Page2 September 15, 1992 Petition: Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) File No: RZ-92-008 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS Right of Way Adequacy: Scheduled Improvements: Type of Concurrency Document Required: Roads adjacent to this property have recently been improved. No additional right of way is required. None Certificate of Capacity for each phase STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03 ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the official Zoning Atlas, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 0 Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St, Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed amendment is consistent with the spirit and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. . Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with aH elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan including Future Land Use assuming that all uses ultimately placed in phase II (the future strip center) are allowed within the NeighborhoOd Commercial zoning classification. Page 3 September 15, 1992 Petition: Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) File No: RZ-92-008 ® Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is incOnsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land ,uses in the area. 4, Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; The conditions in the area have not changed. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilitieS, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The proposed use is not expected to create excessive additional demand on public facilities in this area. Water and sewer service is to be provided by St. Lucie County Utilities. The developer has submitted a traffic impact analysis which indicates that traffic generated by this project will not negatively impact the transportation network in this area. ® Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed rezoning is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The site contains a number of large pine trees which will be destroyed by this development. These trees will be replaced as indicated on the landscape plan. Page 4 September 15, 1992 Petition: Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) File No: RZ-92-008 Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affeCts of such patterns; This proposed PNRD, if approved, will result in an orderly and logical development pattern. The proposed PNRD is located consistently with the commercial location criteria as specified in the text of the Land Use Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. go Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and interest of this Code; The proposed amendment has been determined not to conflict with the public interest and the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS Thl ~ ,~_...s.rezon.ns to PNRD would allow the construction of an 8,600 square foot Eckerd's Drug Store and a 6,900 square foot strip center on the northeast corner of Prima Vista Blvd. and Floresta Drive. The petitioners have submitted a site plan for this property as required for PNRD applications and have demonstrated that the uses proposed are suitable for this site, Because of its location at the intersection of Prima Vista and Floresta, and the existing, subdivision pattern, this property is not ideally suited for single-family residences and ~s more appropriate for the use that is proposed in this rezoning. The petitioners have demonstrated that this retail use can exist at this site without adversely affecting surrounding residences. The project's landscape plan indicates that aH boundaries adjacent to residences will be provided with landscape buffers as required in the Land Development Code. These and other improvements specified on the site plan will serve to eliminate any excessive impacts to. the. surrounding community. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions: 1. With the exception of Fuel and Ice Dealers, only retail uses which are permitted in Neighborhood Commercial zoning shah be allowed in the PNRD. Page 5 September 15, 1992 Petition: Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) File No: RZ-92-008 1 A legal description specifying the limits of phase I shall be pr6vided prior to Final PNRD approval. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact this office. Attachments DPK/ H:\WPkRZ92008 RZ92008(DPK-p&z) CC.' County Attorney County Engineer Utilities Director Fire Marshal Cynthia Angelos Press/Public Page 6 September 15, 1992 Petition: Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) File No: RZ-92~008 Suggested motion to approve/deny this requested change in zoning MOTION TO APPROVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUClE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUClE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE RESOLUTION # 92-194, THEREBY GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE pETITION OF CHARLES GRUNBAUM (Eckerd Drugs) FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM RS-4 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 4 DU/AC) TO PNRD (PLANNED NON,RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT), MOTION TO DENY: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUClE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE. ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE PETITION OF CHARLES GRUNBAUM (Eckerd Drugs) FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM RS-4 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY 4 DU/AC) TO PNRD (PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) BECAUSE ... [CITE REASON WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. M'rl ROAD CR PROJECT LOCATZON VISTA ROAD Z ST. UC]-E I MARTIN COUNT JNTY Y ZONING .FY LAND USE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 RESOLUTION NO. 92-194 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY AND PARTIAL FINALDEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR A PROJECT KNOWN iAS ECKERD DRUGS-(RIVER PARK)- A PLANNED !NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: CHANGE 1. Mr. ¢ zoning from Ri (Planned Non-B below. Lots 31, ~~ ~ subdivisic ~ in .Plat Bo Lucie Coun'. ~~5~ 2. On Sep% Zoning Commissio was published in owners within 501 recommended to th RS-4 (Residential Residential Devel.. ~ition for a change in y - 4 du/ac) to PNRD ~e property described )ck 39 of the ir" as recorded records of St. . ~ County Planning and u~- ! ~ h due public notice · f ~+~-~ led to all property ^,~,~~~ 3~ ~o the hearing, and ~ ~~ ~ ~nge inzoning from ~/~ ~[~& ~'~ _~_~ ~-- ~NRD (Planned Non- 3.. On ~ th~s Board hold a public hoar~n~ on po~o~[~Sh~n~ a not~co of ~uch hoar~n~ ~n tho ~or~ ~uc~e ~ews and not~fT~n~ b7 ma~l of all owners of proport7 w~h~n 500 foo~ of tho subject properS7. 4. The proposed zoning change is consistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. SITE PLAN 5. The petitioner is proposing an 8,600 square foot Eckerd Drug store and 6,900 Square feet of additional retail space at the northeast corner of Prima Vista Blvd. and Floresta Drive. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 6. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary:site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet all technical requirements and to be consistent with the future landUse maps from the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the conditions set forth in Section A of this resolution. 7. On September 24, 1992, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning' Comm~ss~o.n' 'held a public hearing of whichdue public notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News an~ mailed to all property ownerS Within 500 feet at least 15 days pri°r~to the hearing, and recommended to .this Board that P~li~inary DevelOPment Plan approval for the project knoWn as Eckerd Drugs 8. This Board held a public hearing on of which due public notice was published in .e News and mailed notice was sent to all property owners within 500 feet. 9. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, gOals, objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 10. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property,' the character of the neighborho°d, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. 11. Ail reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. 12- ~The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated, so as not to interfere with the development and use of n~ighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 13.~ The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities ~ and services. 14. The applicant has demonstrated that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.04 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project known as Eckerd Drugs (River Park) - A Planned Non-Residen%ial Development, Phase I only, be, and the same is hereby, approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Culpepper and Terpening, Inc., dated August 11, 19.92, and date stamped received by the St. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Lucie County Community Development Administrator on September 2, 1992, subject to the following condition: Only those retail trade uses which are identified as permitted in Section 3.00.~01 (Q~) (f), (~N~commerc~a~, Neig_hborhood: %7~li~,St. ~ie C~ty LaFd' D~vel6p~nt ~ode)~a~~th~zed~ ~ -'~ t wi the d~ · : ~c~ ~'di d~e~i b ~ ~~r~ ~~p ~a ~ ~a~~ ~n~b The p~ope~ty on ~h~ch ~n~s u=v=~,,,=,,~ ~ ~ 1213 described as follows :~.~ +t~ bO ~.~lL ~'J-~[~ ~'J~ ~ 14 ...~.~,1 ~ ,^ ~°~-'-' t__!.. . '~/. T~nned Non-Residential Development approval shall expire 18 l-on /t~'l~'~J , building permits are issued or an extension is 19 I grant~ccordance with Section 11.02.06.B.3, St. Lucie County 20 I Land DeveloPment Code. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ~. The conditions set forth in Section A are an integral nonseverable part of the site plan approval granted by this resolution. If any condition set forth in Section A is determined to, be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines t6.comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approvalgranted by this resolution shall become null and void. ~_. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings ~scribed in Sectzon A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Developm~nt,f~dm~nistrator. ~. A Ce~ificate of Capacity, a copy of which isattached to this resol~on~,was granted by the Community Development Administrator on /'~./ , 1992 L~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 After motion and second, the vote on follows: Chairman Jim Minix XXX Vice-Chairman Jack Krieger XXX Commissioner Judy Culpepper XXX Commissioner Havert L. Fenn XXX Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner XXX .ion was as PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this day of , 1992. ./~BOARD OF COUNTY CONMISSIONERS~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ~/ BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FOP~AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK DPK, H:\WP\ECKRES COUNTY ATTORNEY AGENDA-P~NINGAND ZONINGCOMMISSION THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1992 7:00 P.M. Petition of Charles Grunbaumfor a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non- Residential Development) to seek Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs fOr the following described property: Lots 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 in Block 39 of the Subdivision entitled "River Park Unit Four as recorded in Plat Book 11 on Page 9 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. (Location: Northeast corner of Floresta Avenue and Prima Vista Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, FL) Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to .any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners September 9, 1992. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News, a newspaper of ~general circulation in St. Lucie County, on September 3, 1992. File No. RZ-92-008 Charles Grunbaum 2513 S Federal Hwy Ft Pierce FL 349182 Cynthia Angelos, Esq. 10570 S Federal Hwy Ste 300 Port St Lucie FL 34952 Roads Property Acquisition Div Roger PoitrasAnnex 2300 Virginia Av Ft Pierce FL34982 City of Port St Lucie 121 SW Port St Lucie Blvd Port St Lucie FL 34984 oo ~-4 CD C~ ILl 0 t. LJ L,I.J L.~ II ~ Ii ~ II ,..j p..4 I-. II !-. I-- Il II LLI II 01C~J II II !! !! I! It Il fl II II Il c:o I! II F-- Il CD fl _.!,,~,. ii ~ 'ii c..,1 c~ I! ,cC C~C:D II ,d: (,~ fl ...I F--CD I.~ ~-4 CZ) II LO ~ II ~.. LLJ I! C:) C:) ~ ..J :::D I! CDC::) ..J fl uJ 'm,' II ~ !1 :).. LLJ II F-' ~ II L~C:) :::) t,L.I II It I-- I! LLJ II C.) II ::::) LL.,t I1 -.I II CO ~ I! ,4: ,Cl: Il Zl'-- m,- II 0 ~: II 0¢,0''v' ~ il ::~ L~ C) I! II II II !! Ii Ii II Il II II !1 II C) I! CDC) ~ z z lz ~ il cON I! il il II Il II Ii II II Il et1 II ~ II II !-- II ~ II _.1 II 1,1 !1 v' X II II ,1~ ~ 0 II ~ ~ ~ tl ~ ~ !! ~ ~ I! ~ tl z I! !i ~ II I! ~ II ~ I1 ~ U II U tl l--' ...IA .--~ I--'0 0 ~" tl ~1: II ~o0 0 II I! II II II II II il II !1 H II I! o !1 II o II ~ II 1=.4 0 ~ o ~ I! 0(:3 I--!-- I--- ~ I! ,'-~ 03 N~3 {:30 ' ~ ,.i I! ,--~ I'~ ¢Nlu3 o(:3 oc3 I! II II II II II II Ii il il !1 I-- il O I-- I! ,_.~ 0 ~ I1 ~- ..I ~,~ 0 1--- · ,--I I! I-- e,,.-~ > ~ ._~ 0 i,-- i~. il - ¢~. cl. !! ~'J (:3 - ~ ~ ~ Z 1 0 ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ 0 ~ 0 ~04 0 4 II U~ ~ ~0 0 I! ~ OU ~ ~ ~0 Il ~ ~ ~0 ~Z II Z ~ ~ ~U II Z ~ ~ Z ~ !1 ~ 0 ~ U !1 0 t 0 0 ~ ~ Ii 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ !1 0 0 ~ O~ ~ i ~ 0 U ~ 0 ~ II ~ ~ 0 O~ O~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ !1 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 O~ O~ ~ ~ O~ ~ II ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 O~ 0 O~ ee 0 0 --~ z z "~ ~"-J 0 0 I--. 0 t~ !-- 0 c.~ o 10~ 0 z cxln,- lX~Z Z o ~ ~_~ C3 0,--I C~ OlO N -.t II II !1 !1 II II II il II II il II II II II II -.I II LUll ~ ! # ~ n ii n o I! ~. ,,1~1. I-- ~ ii i.- II -J I! rw II ~ !! II Iai Ii .-i ::~ II II !-- 11 ~ z 0 o o o ~-~ o Zll ~ 0 ~ ~ O~ J O~ N i O~ N ~ Il ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 OH 0 O~ 0 ~'~ 0 0 ~ oo oo ~0 ~ ~o0 Oo ~0 z z 0 z 0 z ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~00 ~ ~ 0~ ~Z OO ~0 ~Z ~ ~0 Z ~ Z Z o o '-* 0 O0 i.u o oo o z 0 LUll I~. II ~'- II _,1 ~.-~ II II o ee ee "* 0 o oo L~O 0 ~ Lu ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 C~ 0 0 0 [~1 0 0 CO 0 ~ O0 ~ C,J II .-I C~ ""J ii C,~ "*' cO -J u') II CT) (/') ~ tl Lu _j n,.' II :3:: II C) fl II II !i II II II II II il I! II II C:) II C:) II il I !! ~.~ ii K~ II C~ ~ II o u ~ II O0 C:)CM ., .. ,'"'~ l%1 Olio o c~o c)q~ 0 ~" !1 -.I ~.'~ 03¢.D II !--I-- FI-- ~ ..... ~ ~ II ~ ~N O0 II ~ II II II !1 II Il II II II ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ I! o 0 ~ II ~ ~ N II ~ o ~ ~ Ii o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o II ~ ~ o ~ ~ o 0 II ~ ¢ ~ ~0 Z 0 ~ ~0 ~ ~0 II ZO az II ~ ~u !1 Z ~ II & 0 ~ 0 & ~ II 0 ~ 0 0 Il 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 Ii O~ 0 O~ N ~ O~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ 0 ~ 0 c) cmo I-- I1 F--F- II !1 ~) Ii oo u.I II ,--~ o) -J II I! II !1 II II II II II II Ii II II II il .,I II '~ II LUll I-- -J i II (,/) II (,n !1 ,ct F--O 0 il LI,,J ~ CD II CC) F.,.~'~" I! ,ct -'-J ~ I! -.i I! LU ~ II CS. CC CD II 0 ~ Il '" II II II II !1 !1 I! II II il II II I! I-- II I! _j..-.. II mil I-- v' i c~ n r~- ~ -I II o,. o ..... ~'~ 0 0 ~ o o 0 0 ~. mz ~'0 oo oo oo z o o o ~ o '~ o o o (/) o ~ {222) z 0 0 ~z *'~'0 z o 0 ~ O ~ II I O~ N O~ N ~ 0 U G II O O-- i O~ ~ i O~ N i O. N Zll ~ O ~ O ~ O 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 c) o '-~ 0 0 %:' :~J II iv) il II II II II I! It II II II II I! II !1 II I-.- "~ H ~ II ..I "~: 0',-~ II ~ O ii ~ ~ 0 II ~ 0~ ~ ~ Ii !1 ~ I1 0 g U il ~ ~ il ~ ~ 0 !1 0 ~ !1 ~ II M ~ II 0 ~ K II ~ II 0 ~ ~ II U g II ~ II 0 II 0 - ~ II 0 ~ II 0 ~ ~ II Z 0 II ii il II I II ~ Ii ~ !1 ~ o o o z 0 lis ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 Il 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ II ~ O~ N O~ ~ O~ m O~ b II 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ O~ 3 II ~ ~ 0 il II il Il II II II II II ii, II II Il !i II F-- Ii 0 -J I! _..I C~:II (,,,) ~ , ~'~ 0 II ~ --J II "~ (:~ Ii ~c: :~- I! 0.. II ~ -J ::::) I! C) -.t Ii 0 ~' ~" 0 II 0 ~ II · I:~ ~ I! (:~ ~" II 0 I'~ Ii C~: II II II 0 ~ Ii il I! !1 I! Z: II !1 II II c) ~ '-~ ~Z~ SO 0~-~ ~- 0 ii. Z~ 0 ~Z ~-0 -0~.) :~0 ee 0 II II II II II II !1 II II I! Ii II il II --III "q: !! tull tl I,~ !! 0 ii !,~ ~'~ 0 II ~ -.1 I! ~ I~ II ~ ~ II I:~ II --,I I! 1,,i..1 .Z: II ~ i~ 0 II i~_ Jl I-- K il Z: I.i,.I It ~ II U 1:~ il i.i..i II II i--- t,,1=1 II U II --J !1 1:~ II I~11 'c$: !t I.iJ ~'-,,.- ~ I1 ~',.,~ g ~,-,~ il U m,,- Ii II 0 II 11 II 11 It I1 II Ii tl 11 I'.,.. !1 tl il II Ii 0 ~'- 0 ~-~ :~-" z ~Z ~ 14. 0 0 0~.~ ~z ~0 ~ ~0 ~ O~ 0 ~ ~ 0~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~1- o ~1- o o ~ ~ o o ~ o ~ oo 0 ~ c~zo oo coz 0 0~ 0 ~ ~0~ _ I.-- ,:::) I! (X) 130 !1 It Ii II II II II II tl 0 II ~.. II !1 II II I-- II O i-- ..I II ...I 0 ~ II ..I II ¢~ 0~03 tX: Ii O ..J e-,,~ .o -.J ::31-- (:3 il I-- ::~ I'~ ~ ~ 0 II i10 0 ~,,,~ I~ ~ 0 ~"'~ (~C) ~ ~ II ~ Ii ~ ~ II 0 ~ It ~ o ~ 0 ~ II -~ 0 ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ 0 ~u~ 0 II ~ II ~ II z II o II ~ ~ o il o I1 o 0 ~ Q !1 o u ~ o u ~ ~ ~ It ~ o o 0 ~ 0 II ~X ~ ~ he Stuart News and The Port St.: Lucie News · · ~ (an edit,on of lhe Stuart Nears) 8'lATE OF FLOIIlDA Cl. (~UN~I~g OF MARTIN: COUNTY OF ST. buglE: - Before~the u.dersigned .t, thority appeared .,~TtILEEN N. i PRITCHARD who o,, oath says that he/she ACCOUHTS P~C ~ "~n~e o~ The ~t..rt Nemm~, il~d The Port ~t. Lueie Ne~, a }lally iae~paper l'td>liShed at Stuart i,i Mart{Il G¢]tllltyl Florida, that the attached espy of advertisement, bel.g a l~m, the ~atter of F~LIc ,~~ a~a ~ ~. DR. ~~ ~D~ ~ OP~ A in~ the ~' u - _ Go vt, was I'td)lished i~ The Stuart Ne~ mid The Port St. LUeie News i~l the issues of . 1~ ~. 3. 1992 { : Affiant further says that the said The Stuart News and The {'oft St, Lueie News is a newspaper pul)lished at Stuart, i. said Mavtl. (loollty, Florida with offices a.d paid ~lart{ ~ Oouflty, Florida a.d St. 14~eie GoOnty, Florida and that t lie said newspapers have heretofore {)ee~ eonti~uously published i~ said Marti~l Gou.ty, Florida m~d distril~uted i~ Marti. Gounty, Florida at~d St. I.ueie County, Florida, for ~ period of one year .ext precedi.g the first publieatio~ of the attached copy of .dvertisement; a~td affiant further says that he/she has ~either paid nor promised any persoH, firn~ or corporation a~y diseot~lt, re{~ate, oommission or reft.~d for the purpose of securb~g this .dvertisement for publleat{o, i~ the said ne~paper. The Stuart Nemm~ has been e~ltered as second class .~atter at tl~e post office 1~{ ~tUqrt, Martin Cou.ty, Flork{~{, .nd Ft. Pierce, St. Lucie .. (~m.ty, Florida and has been for a period of one year .ext p{'eeedlag the first publication of the attached eopy of ' 8m~rn t0 mid subscribed before me /{iiS ~. , ay { ; ~ .. - - ,, -. HUDSON (Real) .;,:% .. it · · .. _ d~ Petition 6f Pao1 Jacquin' ,~nge in zOning from' RS.-2 .d~d. Silgo Fomi~ ~ 2 'di; / ~,c) 'to II AG-1 (Agri~ul~oI. l'{~"/oc)' to:al-II ,~ ~ ~ N ~0 ~ ~ 4~'~ o~s I --' :::":--::.--.':, ,. ' :..4;;~k~;~;:. I cords of St. esto Avenue in Room i01, minstrafion P.M. or as ble. :,- ..... ','PURSUANTi.??:TO 286.0105, AGENDA - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1992 7:00 P.M. Petition of Charles Grunbaum for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non- Residential Development) to seek Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs for the following described property: Lots 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 in Block 39 of the Subdivision entitled "River Park Unit Four as recorded in Plat Book 11 on Page 9 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. (Location: Northeast corner of Floresta Avenue and Prima Vista Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, FL) Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and Zoning Commission are elec~tronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior ~o this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners September 9, 1992. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News, a newspaper of general circulation in'st. Lucie County, on September 3, 1992~. File No. RZ-92-008 HAROL:D I% GOLDMAN, OF COUNSEL LICENSED IN FLORIDA AND PENNSYLVANIA ERIC J. BRUNING LICENSED IN FLORIDA AND NEW JERSEY OYNTH A G. ANGELOS LICENSED IN FLORIDA AND VIRGINIA ROY T. MILDNER DIANA GOLDMAN LA W OFFICES OF · GOLDMAN, BRUNING & ANGELOS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW LAW AND FINANCE BUILDING ] 0570 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY ONE PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34952 (407) 878-4700 OR (407) 335-8332 FAX NUMBER (407) 335-8359 September 23, 1992 DELIVERED :Mr. Douglas Skidmore 805 Barrel Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Re: Pl~anning and Zoning Board Hearing September 24 Eckerd Drug PNRD , Prima Vista and Floresta Drive Dear Mr Skidmore: 1992 Please be advised that this office is acting as apPlicant/agent in the referenced rezoning. We were under the understanding that this matter was to be heard by the Planning and Zoning Board on October 22, 1992 and for this reason many letters in support of the application did not get into your Package. Accordingly, we have enclosed copies of those letters of support which were directed to our office and would greatly apPreciate your including them in your package for the Hearing which is now scheduled for September 24, 1992. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, GOL~ING & ANGELOS, Cynthia G. Angelos P.A. CGA/cm cc: Dennis Murphy DAVIS Weldon & JoAnn 4401 Willow Avenue River Park, Florida 34952 September 23, 1992 J. P. Terpening, Chairman St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Dear Mr. Terpening: Re: Prima Vista/Floresta Zoning change PRND My husband and I have lived in River Park for five years. We would enjoy the convenience of the easy shopping an Eckerds store would provide us. It would eliminate going to US $1 and 'wrestling with all of the traffic. The PRND Zoning change would .be a definite improvement to the area. You have our approval for the PRND Zoning change. FROH GB~ 407-555-8~59 rotember 23, 1992 9.23.1992 16:47 MI . J.P. Terpening, Chairman S . ~ucte County P annin9 and 7. chino Commission 210.0 v~,gtn,a Avenue Ft' P ~e~-~e, Flortda c~o David Kelly I UI ~m · property owner of two lots, I.o~ 1, Untt 55, and Lot ft 56 ~n the River Park Subdivision. t am aware Of the )coming No[ice to File a Re-Zon~n~ ~or the pr~port~ on ~ke c~rner o~ Primm Vista and Floresta Drive' end I ~ou]d m~r'ongly recommend mnd strongly support the re-zoning of this p-oper~y to a commer~ie! uae, Al_~o~ I wOul t ~mt I mi since ther'e Now that ~he ,,l~e is extremely ~ui~able for Prima Vista. Thank you for your cons~der~tlo~ regarding '~,~ry truly yours~ support lebttn8 Prima Vista go to commercial use is a 9rear need for this ~ype of use ~n [~,S area. romd is being widened, ~e-zontn9 to commercial thts matEer. [ 00 P · RICKEY L. ATTORNEy AT LAW 1595 S,I~. PORT ST. LUGII~ BOUL~VA~ ~RT ST. LUCIE, F' · 5 j/ 8epteaIber 23~ 1992 J.P. Terpenin~, p, ~. ~ulpep~er & Terponinq 005 Virginia Avenue For: Pie:ce, Florida 34950 Z am~ part oWner of property located on Prima Vista Boulevard. I support the Land Use and Zoning changes necessary for %he ooastr~o~ion of an Eckard Drug Store on the abcve-refereaued Property, Z believe the utilization of the subject property for the intended USe is consistent with souad ~rlnc~ple~ of Land Use and Planning. Thsre are certainly no usel other than commercial typ~ uses t=&£fl~, ,its Pro~imity tO th9 in%ers~ction and the liI~itations on O-q'"'2~x1992 16: 1~ FROM M~NAG.~-,,~ENI OFFICE ~ 4643:s:5~ P.01 Michael B. Kane III 4900 River Place White City, FL 34982 September 23, !992 J- P. Tmypen~n~;, Chairman St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission ~$00 Virginia Avenue Re- Prima Vi~ta/F1 ore~ta Zoning change P~ND Dear Mr. Terpening, ! am a resident an~ property owner of St. Lucie County for many years-. Y also have friends who live in the River Park Area. I th~nk the Eckerd Retail PRND proposed will be a great benefit to those in River P~rk, Eckerd i8 a "quality" company that takes pride ~n its bus~ne~s. It's important for. a community to have this kind of "Quality" which will allow more residents to s'hop locally a~d shou]4 enhance favorably on area property values. Prima Vista Blvd is and will continue to be a major road for east we~t traffic. This is a great corner for this type of business. I support the PRND and strongly urge you to approve the zoning request. DEBORAH G. tILglN 201 N.E. Arbor Avenue Pl. sr. Lucie, FL 34952 JUSTIN ~ ELEANOR GREEN 201 N.E. Arbor. Avenue · Pt. St. Luoie, Florida 34952 September 22, 1992 J- P- Terpening, Chairman St. Luoie County Planning and Zoning Commission 2300 ¥irginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Dear Mr. Terpening; Re: Zoning change Prima Vista/Flo~esta File #RZ-92-008 Ry wife and I have lived in River Park now for almost four years. We would welcome the opportunity and convenience of being able to shop locally without the having to travel out to US #1. We are in fa. roy of the zoning change. It would be a great improvement for the appearance of that corner. Si ncere 1 y, To: J.P.Terpening Chairman / St Lucie Co.Planning & Zoning Commission 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft Pierce,F1. From: C.A.Schaming Lic. R.E.Broker and Builder 1445 SE Larkwood Circle Pt St Lucie,F1.34952 Date: Sept.22,1992 Subject: Petition of Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) File Number RZ 92-008 Dear S ir, As a former resident of River Park I realize what an advantage it would be to have a drug store such as Eckerd Drugs available,which would not require driving on U S ~ 1 The intersection has been engineered and improved to ~permit any traffic that Eckerd Drugs would generate. Its obvious that residential would not be the best use. I respectfully request that approval of this project be granted. Sincerely, C.A. Schaming September 22,1992 TOe The St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission FROM~ William Bo Sherman As a businessman,realtor,and interested citizen living in Port St. Lucie for 14 years,I Would like to support the pro- posed re-loning of the NE corner of Prima ¥ista and Floresta to PNRD,as a positive benefit to the majority of residents in the area. I understand .it meets the Comprehensive Plan,and all other County criteria for such re-~oning,in afully positive manner. In a-~-~.on,,~Oaand~a~+~ ...:.~ · ~the expanded right_:.of way -ntersect~on,residential use is out of the question,and the site is an ideal central location for iow-key neigh- borhoodshopping' and services,without the necessity of driving onto busy US 1. The new width of both streets of the inter- section,plus the canal at the rear,provide b · good uffering for nearby residential units. Sincerely, Commercial & Residential Rentals CHARLES ~RUNBAUM 2513 S. Federal Highway Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 September 22. 1992 To: Mr. J.P. Terpening, Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Dear Mr. Terpening, Re: Corner of Prima Vista & Floresta Re-zone PNRD Charles Grunbaum (Eckerd Drugs) With the widening of Prima Vista Blvd and its continued use as a major east west road it is apparent that the subject parcel is not suitable for residential development. I strongly feel a small neighborhood related facility as proposed would be an asset to River Park and the surrounding community. 1. It would provide local residents with some basic services closer to home, especially for the elderly. 2. It would initially create jobs during the construction and finally result in additional permanent jobs, which would have a positive impact on our unemployment rate in St. Lucie County. 3. It would add additional property tax dollars to St Lucie County which is greatly needed. ' 4. The property is unique in that it has a wide waterway to the rear which adds to the distance between existing houses and the proposed center. 5. The special uses under this PNRD protects the community from any non-conforming use. 6. It will help to reduce daily and weekly car tr~ps to other major roadways like US 91, thereby having a positive effect on St. Lucie County traffic. Page 2 7. The property is ideally located on a corner parcel close to the center of town and has good access. 8. This small community center would have a positive effect on both current and future property values as it provides the community with some of its basic needs without having to drive to far. Eckerds reputation as a chain speaks for itself. They operate a full service store supplying the community with their basic needs, which includes everything from diapers to school supplies, cosmetics, prescriptions and more. I have been involved with the St. Lucie County community for over 12 years. Eckerds enjoys an excellent reputation in its industry and they run a nice quiet clean business which is what we would like to have in any community including River Park. For the reasons outlined above, and more, I respectfully urge that this PNRD be granted. Respectful ly Submitted Charles OrunBaum eby ,,,~ou of' General COntractOrs I^ September 23, 1992 Econon c Coun Advan~ Burn,ss Oppo~u~s j.p. Terpening, Chairman Lucie CoLL~ty Plan~ing & Zoning Board O. Box 1449 Pierce, FL 34954-!449 Dear Mr. Te~ I would like to address an issue the Pta~ing & Zoning Board will consider at its Thursday, September 24th meeting. Unfortunately, do to a prior commitment, z wi!! ~ot be able to present my comments in person. Please accept this correspondence in my absence. Although in this instance I am not speaking on behalf of the St. Lucie County Econom/c Development Co~cil (EDC), ! have been outspoken on the need for additional commercial and industrial Property in Port St. Lucie. In my op/nion, the existing commercial and industrial land use and zoning in Port St. Lucie, including the ~n~incorporated area known as River Park, can not support a build-out ~opulation of 250,000 Without property to a¢co~odate us~ness, the City will continue' to export its workforce a~d import its products and services. In addition, without the diversification of the tax base through business investment, the residents of Port st. Lucie a~d St. Lucieor both.C°unty will face continued cuts in services, increased property taxes As to the specific o~/estion of ,, : . . - = ~erty along Prima Vi What is the hm best and sta, I remain s m!ent . . . g best use of the r " - - ' slg~fmcant!y affect ~he -~ .......... ~ operty? , Wmll a chanme acceptable? are a few of ~- ~---~: ...... · ! Is a change politically ~= Ru=ou=ua~ =nan need a~swered before the i~su~ canbe resolved. Although my experience tells me that property is worth more when zoned commercial rather than resi~entia!, the value of the property may not be a critical factor in this case As a result, ! am not able to offer an opinion. '· Thank you for the opportunity to provide input i~ this matter. Sincerely, .g2-R~re~t Executive Director CC: ~erry Virta, Community Development Administrator, St. Lucie County James Lawless, Mayor, City of ~ort St. Lucie ~o~.COop~,City Manager, City of Port St. Lucie arty Tob~n, Planning Director, City of Port St. Lucie Cynthia Ange!os, President, Greater Port St_ Lucie Chamber of Commerce Les Hargrave, Executive Vice President, Greater PSL Chamber of Commerce 900V{vg~aAve,,Su~16, Fo~c~PL~4982 (407) 460-6700-!-8~-532_0099.FAX(,~27)460.670i From · o: Da~:e Subject: Terry Virta (TERRYV) BMiller Thursday, September 24, 1992 RZ-92-008 4:38 pm Please pass on that we had a call from Walter Tomsen, 104 N Naranja and he is totally opposed to this rezoning. Halbert & Elizabeth C. Schafer 372 S. E. Tranquilla Avenue Port St. Lucie, FL 34983 (407) 878-2681 Board of County Commissoners J. P. Terpening, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 Dear Mr. Terpening: September 14, 1992 We strongly object to the proposed rezoning of River Park Unit Four Lots 31-35 in Block 39 from RS-4 to PNRD as explained in your letter dated-- September 9, 1992 . This is a lovely section of homes in River Park and it is our strong conviction that the areas in or adJoinig Prima Vista Boulevard, developed or otherwise remain zoned Residential. There are several pharmacies within less than a three mite range of the proposed~location. Rite-Aid and Walgreens are quite close and Tanner Pharmacy is easily within walking distance. A new pharmacy recently became available in St. Lucie West. ' The above mentioned lots have lay vacant for years even though the area around them was developed. Underutilization of this property denied the community of taxes during this period and now they are proposing a further' threat to property values with this unneeded development. Sincer~ Schafer ' / Elizabeth C. Schafer~ COMMUNrlY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE CO.r FL \. Orange, Ct. September 15, 1992 Mr. J. ]]~. Terpening, Ci~airman Planning and Zoning Commission St. Lucie County, Florida 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Fi 34982 -5652 Dear 'O bj ~eC't'ion' ' ~t'o' 't'he~ p'e~t'i°t'i'o'n 'o'f ' 'Ch'. 'Grunbaum I am the owner of the house at 363 Tranquilla Avenue, Pt. St. Lucie, F1 which is located on lot of Block 38. ~4y house is in the Block adjacent to Block 39 of the Subdivision entitled River Park Unit Four as recorded in Plat Book 11 on Page 9 of the Public Records of St. Luc-~e County, Florida. I hereby 9bject to the petition of Charles Grunbaum for a change of zoning of the lots 31,32, 33, 34 and 35 in Block 39. A change of zoning to ~Planned Non-Residential Development~would not only depreciate the value of my home and the homes in the vecinity, but would also increase the traffic in the area, specially on Prima Vista Boulevard and cause problems that would require hiring of more police force for the area. I am renting my house at the present time, but I would-.ho~e that by denying that change of zoning to Mr. Grun~am~, the area will keep its residential atmosphere and I can retire there in the near future. Sincerely, Mariacristina Von Feldt 502 Howellton Road Orange, Ct 06477 BOARD, OF COUNTY DEVELOPM6NT DIRECTOR, TERRY L. VIRTA, AICP F A X # (407) 468-1735 TRANSMISSION COVER FORM DATE: ATTN: RE: NO. OF. S ENDER:P~~~ (INCL. COVER): COMMENTS: HAVER/L FENN, District No. 1 e JUDY CULPEPPER. District No. 2 · JACK KRIEGER. District No. 3 · R. DALE TREFELNER. District No. 4 · JIM MIN1X District No 5 County Administrator -- JAMES V. CHISHOLM ' 2300 Virginia Avenue e Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Director: (407) 468-1590 · Building: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407) 468-1576 Zoning: (407) 468-1553 · Code Enforcement: (407) 468-1571 PORT ST. LUCIE TELEPHONE NO. (407) 878-4898 FAX COVER FAX ~ (407,) 283-4129 ~OTAL~ PAGES INCLUOZNG COVER SHEET, FAX NO. TO: PLEASE C~L SHOULD THERE'... BE ANY PROBLEM J YES .... NO ,_¢,' I 0 Central Parkway, Suite 130, Stuart, FL 34994 P~one (407) ~d-=~'** ~; 19 FROH GS~ 487-335-8359 9.24. 1992 16:81 GOLDMAN, BRUNING& ANOELOS, P.A. A~ORNEY~ AT ~W i 0~70 ~OUTH U,~, HIGHWAY ON~ ' P, 2 September 23, 1992 BAND pEL ZVI~P, ED Mr. Ken Sattler 347 S.E. Fisk Road Port St. Lucie, Florida 34984 Re: Planning and"~6ning Board Hearing September 24, 1992 Eckerd Drug PNRD Prima Vista and Floresta Drive Dear Mr. Sattler: Please be advised that this office is acting as applicant/agent in the referenced rezonlng. We were under the understanding that this matter was to be heard by the Planning and Zoning Board on October 22, 1992 and for this reason many letters in support of the application did not get into your package. Accordingly, we have enclosed copies of those letters of support which were directed to our office and would greatly appreciate your including them in your package for the Hearing which is now scheduled for September 24, 1992. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, GOLDmaN, B~ING .& ANGW. LOS, P.A. Cy~hia G. Ang~lo~ CGA/cm cc: Dennis Murphy FROM GBQ 9.24.1992 16:01 P. i HA.~OL~ H. (]OL~MAN, OF ~O~JNSEL ~JOD. N~_.~ ~N ~t~A ~L~ F~NN~YIL.VANiA QYNTHb~ ~,. UOiil~l~Q IN FLO~IDA AND CAROLYN V. KOWALSKI GOLDMAN, BRUNING ~: ANGELO~, P,A. A~ORNEY~ AT LAW LAW ANO FINANCE ~UIL~tNG 10570 ~OUTH U,~, HIGHWAY ONE FAX TRAN~MITTA,L LETTER PLF2%SE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES IMMEDIATELY TO: NAME: Dennis Murphy or David Kell}r · FAX NUMBER CALLED: 468-1735 ._ DATE: 9/24/92 TIM~: 4:15 FROM: Cynthia G. Angelos FAX NUMBER IS: (407) 335-8359 GENERAL OFFICE NUMBER IS: (407) 878-4700 or 335-8332 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES IS 2 (INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL LETTER) IF YOU DO NOT RECIZI'~E ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL OiiR OFFICE SOON AS POSSIBLE. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: This letter was delivered :o the n]embers of the Planning and Zoning . Board today with the letters of support which were previously faxed to your office. CLIENT: Eckerd 92-0329 FILE NO' -- 09/23"92,,, i$'11 '~4074606701 ECON, DEV, CNCL, ~.002 September 23, 1992 St. Ludc County Economic Dcvclopmerit Counc Advancing Bu~ness Opporrunid~s Mr. J.P. Terpeni~g, Chairman St. Lucie County Planning & Zoning Board % P.O. Box 1449 Fort Pierce, FL 34954-1449 Dear Mr. Terp~ I would like to address an issue the Planning & Zoning Board will consider at its Thursday, September 24th meeting. Unfortunately, do to a prior commitment, I wall not be able ko present my comments in person. Please aocept this correspondence in my absence. ~though in this instance I am not speakLug on behalf of the St. Luci~ Economic Development Council (EDC), I have been outspoken on the ::_, for additional commercial and industrial property in Port St. Lucie~ opinion, the existing commercial and industrial la~d use and zoning in Port St.. Lucie= including the unincorporated area k~own as River Park, can not support a build-out population of 250,000. Without property to accommodate business, the City will continue to export its workforce a~d import its products a~d services. In addition, without the diversification of the tax base through business investment, the residents of Port st. Lucie and St. Lucie Co~=nty will face continued cuts Ln services, increased property taxes or both. As to the specific question of property along Prima Vista, i remain silent. ~What is the highest and best use of the property?", "Wiii a change significantly affect the character of the area?", "Is a change politically acceptable?" are a few of the questions that need answered before the issue can be resolved. Although my experience tells me that property is worth more when zoned commercial rather than residential, the value of the property may not be a critical factor in this case. As a result, I am not able to offer an opinion. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in this matter. Sincerely, A1 Rivett Executive Director cC: Terry Virta, Community Development Administrator, St. Lucie County James Lawless, Mayor, City of Port St. Lucie Don Cooper, City Manager, City of Port St. Lu¢ie Patty Tobin, Planning Director, City of Port st. Lucie Cynthia Ange!o$, President, Greater Port St. Lucie Chamber of commerce Les ~argrave, Executive Vice President, Greater PSL Chamber of Commerce 900V{rg4n~Ave.,Su[mi6, Fo~P[=c~FL34982 (407)460-6700-1-8~532-~99-FAX(~?)460-6~I _~:Baue~~&_~: ,~ German Oontr~¢tar~ ! central Parkway, Suite 130, Stuart, FL 34994 Phone (407) 283~41 !9 I. 0 0 .~. N I Halbert & Elizabeth C. Schafer 372 S. E. Tranquilla Avenue Port St. Lucie, FL 34983 (407) 878-2681 Board of County Commissoners J. P. Terpening, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 Dear Mr. Terpening: September 14, 1992 We strongly object to the proposed rezoning of River Park Unit Four Lots 31-35 in Block 39 from RS-4 to PNRD as explained in your letter dated September 9, 1992 . This is a lovely section of homes in River Park and it is our strong conviction that the areas in or adJoinig Prima Vista Boulevard, developed or otherwise remain zoned Residential. There are several pharmacies within less than a three mile range of the proposed location. Rite-Aid and Walgreens are quite close and Tanner Pharmacy is easily within walking distance. A new pharmacy recently became available in St. Lucie West. The above mentioned lots have lay vacant for years evpn though the area around them was developed. Underutilization of this property denied the community of taxes during th~s per~od and now they are proposing a further threat to property values with this unneeded development. Sincer~ ~Schafer Elizabeth C. Schafer ~COMMU"iTY D~¥EILOPM£NT Orange, Ct. September 15, 1992 Mr. J. P. Terpe~ing, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission St. Lucie County, Florida 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce~ Fi 34982-5652 Dear Sirl~ 'O' ~j:e'c'ti'o:n ' 't'O 'the' 'p.'e't!i~t'io'n 'o'f ' 'Ch.' Grun'baum I am the owner of the house.-at 363 Tranquilla Avenue, Pt, St. Lucie, FI which is located on lot 30 of Block 38. B4y house is in the' Block adjacent to Block 39 of the Subdivision entitled River Park Unit Four as recor.ded in Plat Book 11 on Page 9 of the Public ~ecOrds of St. Lucie County, Florida. I hereby ~ to the petition of Charles Grunbaum for a ch[nge-~zoning of the lots 31,32, 33, 34 and 35 in Block 39. A cllange of zoning to *Planned Non-Residential Development~would not only depreciate the value of my home and the homes in the vecinity, but would also increase the traffic in the area, specially on Prima Vista Boulevard and cause problems that would require hiring of more polide force for the area. I am renting my house at the present time, but I would hope that by denying that~change of zoning to Mr. Grun~aum, the area will keep its residential atmosphere and I can retire there in the near future. Sincerely, MariaCristina Von Feldt 502' Howellton Road Orange, Ct 06477 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION£RS September 9, 1992 COMMUNITY D'CVCLOPMCNT ADMINISTRATOR TERRY L. VIRTA, AICP In compliance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code you are hereby advised that Charles Grunbaum has petitioned the Planning and Zoning Commission for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) to seek Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs for the following described entitled ver Park Unit Four as recorded in Plat Book 11 on Page 9 of the Public Records "Ri property: Lots 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 in Block 39 of the Subdivision of St. Lucie County, Florida. (LoCation: Northeast corner of Floresta Avenue and Prima Vista Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, FL) The first public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, September 24, 1992, in Room 101, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon 'Which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above.described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. iff you have any questions, additional information may be obtained by calling Area Code 407, 468-1593 and referencing the File Number found below. South county residents may call toll-free 878-4898, ask for extension 1593. Sincerely, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ;-T~ LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA J~ '~en'~g'~~ ~'~ F~e No. RZ-92-008 HAVERT L, F~ENN, District No, I ® JUDY CULPEPPER, ~strict No. ~'® JACK KRIEGER District No 3 ® R DALE TREFELNER, District No. 4 ® JIM MINIX, District No. 5 2300 Virginia Avenue ® Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administrator: (407) 468-1590 · Growth Management: (407) 468-1553 · Planning: (407) 468- T,~J~ Property Acquisitions: (407) 468-1720 · Codes Compliance: (407) 468-1571 1576 ~ ~ PORT ST. LUCIE'TELEPHONE NO. (407) 878-4898 COMMISSION6RS D6V6LOPM6NT DIR6CTOR TERRY L. VIRTA, AICP F A X # (407) 468-1735 TRANSMISSION COVER FORM DATE: TO: ' j - AT NO. OF PAGES S.~NT (INCL. COVER) P~.IONE: ' ~) HAVER]' L FENN, District No. I e JUDY CULP'EPPER, Distr,iCt No. 2 e JACK KRIEGER District No 3 · County Administra~ f ' ' - IR. DALE TREFELNIER 2 ' o -- JAMES V. CHISHOLM . . District No 4 · JIM MINIX. District No 5 300 Vfrglnla Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Director: (407) 468-1590 · Building: (407) 468-1553 · Planning; (407) 468-1576 Zoning: (407) 468-1553 · Code Enforcement: (4073 468-1571 PORT.ST. LUCIE TELEPHONE NO. (407) 878-4898 ST. LUCIb~-~JOUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING"=OMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 24, 1992 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that f' icants have requested that the St. Lucie Co P1. Zoning Commission consider their request as 1) Petition of Dr. Susan McClure for a Conditional Use p z°perate' a kennel in AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential 1 onlng for the following described property: (Insert Legal Description No. 1 Here) (Location: 3404 West Midway Road, Ft. Pierce, FL) 2) Petition of Paul Jacquin for a change in zoning from RS (Residential, Single ~amil 2 du _ du/ac) to allow for the ,~:_~ac) to. AG.1 (Agricultural °~~un of a landscape nursery the following described property: (Insert Legal Description No. 2 Here) (Location: Jenkins Road approximately 3/4 miles #70 on the Southwest cOrner of Jenkins Road andn°rth of S.R, consisting of 30.78 acres. Graham Road~ 3) Petition of Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, by agent Maurice Snyder for a change in zoning from IH (Industrial, Heavy) to U (Utilities) to allow for the construction of a Wastewater Treatment Plant for the following described property: .(INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION NO. 3 HERE) (Location: Adjacent to the S.E. intersection of Canal No. 101 and 2215 feet west of Selvitz Road. 4) Petition of Charles Grunbaum for a change in zoning from RS-4 (Residential, Single Family - Residential Development) to seek Prelimi~ar~ and Final 4 du/ac) to PNRD (Planned Non? Development Plan approval for the Planned Residential project to be known as Eckerd Drugs for the following described property: Lots 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 in Block 39 of the Subdivision entitled "River Park Unit Four as recorded in Plat Book 11 on Page 9 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Boulevard,(L°cati°n: Northeastport St. Lucie,C°rner FL)Cf Floresta Avenue and Prima Vista PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in A ' ' Room 101, St. Lucie County dmlnzstration Building, 2300 Virginia on September 24, 1992, beginning at 7:00 p M or as soon thereafter as possible. Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will ' need. a record of the proceedi. such purpose, he may need to e nsure that a ye ...... . t, for ~lm'record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence Upon which the appeaI is to be based. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ J. p. TERPENING, CHAIRMAN PUBLISH DATE: SEPTEMBER 3, 1992 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A Being a- parcel of land lying in .Section 5, South, Range 40 East, 'St. Lucie Cq. unty, Florida parti~ularlyldescribed as follows: ' Being the Northerly 'one acre of the followingl descrii parcel: - . . . _. · . . Being that parcel, of Land lying in Lot 9.3,.~....WHITE'~..CI ..... ~ ' , . .~ . '~ according to.the Plat thereof recorded in. Plat. Book.,.1, ~Pa'ge.~ · : .... ,. . -= of the Public .-Records of"St. Lucie...County,' Florida.,: t ~y ~ -.. ~ :~: .:/:~'"~:.. of S~'said parcel being more par. ticula~rly:.;described,.and .s:.,.~j( ~.-~ ' ..~' .~. ..).~:~i',-.~.-'follows: ·Fram'/ the' Northeast 'corner ~.of said:.LOt.[-.?~' k ~":'~;~'::' ;/" ~"::J~':~:27'~?:-241.68 feet /t° the POINT OF- BEGINNING;'-- th~nce..~ continue'j?: ([' .~":-J;":J~'along the same line 210..'feet;.' thence run South and..paCall:el,':..wi~[h :~: ~ ~ the Oest line of..Lot'92;'-a:distauce.~ief-627.66 fe&t;-:mo~&. ......:.;:.. '~:'~:':~' 'J East'~long said..Right-°f~Way., line::'210,'feet;' ~'thende'J'ru'h' N°'rth'~n -:~ '~ "' ' :0~E~ "". . · :~, : . : .... ~o ~eec~ .more or ~ess, ta the POI~T OF BEGI~NI~G.':::'.~;z ..... .~.,:.'.~"~. :: '-" .-~.~ : ' ,' Z - ~.. ' ' ;. ::'-, ""' ., '. ';':. :' '~ '." ~' .- . · '~ ' . .'~ ~., ' - ' , .' .. - :' . "",," . ?.'.~.".,~ .--: '~" '.:.-".?.-' ~esterly 20.00 ~eet.of ~he' follo~ing' described paEcel-'.-::~ '-':.'..~'~? .;.-' . .: ':.':...'-.. -a?oFoing the elat: thereof, recbrd a' i .e :',~,;~;~v.~.. .-,':- : .... . · ..,. . - . .. -la~' ..... · ~'.',a. ~..~.~ .~ ' , _. -... ~ .... ~?:,.. ..~:..o~?the.. PubI~c-.Recor.ds.~o[:,St~ ...... Lucie 0 '_-~.- ' ' · - -' ~.:' .~, . - ~a~ Parce~:ue~ng.','more:=part~cularly described and boUnded 'a-' .'.. ~ follows: Fr°mi~-::the/-Northeast cOrner.?o~ :~said-.Lot 93,"; run' ' ~ -: "' 24!"~8 feet:': to'-th~"~POINT oF . run:...'..' . . along the =same .lin .... Sduth':.a.~d ~a..ratle.i,~: the West Line 0f.'Lo.~"' ~f ~ '. - ~.~-. ~ ~.?.~. East a[6-n . lows: 8.1:.: feet l:.~g ~:'..:t he' ,.Wes t'-.-1 ine poin t-i~ On '-~:',~ ,..:.:'~. (.~'~::~." - '?"-'..-"~ .... SUBJECT: TO: - . . ' ....-. ~~~/~.~ ~esterl.y 20.00 feet . . . . . . ,:' . ,..X~..."?~:,'G,v,~.,~C;,~..:~ .-.; ,., . ,- .... , ~ . ~ ~ ~. ',,'.. : :ance o: .- . t · 13-~ 35S'-'39E~, 13 35 39 E 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4-LESS N 20 FT & LESS E 40 FT OF N 5,40'FT & E 46 FT OF S 783 FT & LESS S 395.95 FT & LESS Z-95 R/W AS ZN OR 246-2375- (12.45_ _ AC) (OR 309-2563) · 13'"35S' 39E 13 35 39 N 353.45 FT OF S 395.95 FT OF E 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4-LESS E 46 FT FOR RD- (5.00 AC) (OR 305-2498) 13.~'-,.35S,.39E=_. 13 35.'39_~NE 1/5 OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 & 'NW-1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4-LESS N 20 FT & LESS Z-95 R/W .. AS'ZN OR 246-2374- (13.33 AC) (OR .309-2563) DESCRIPTION Parcel East of Glades Cut - Off Road A portion of the South 1/2 q~f Section 31, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, said portion being more particularly described as follows: Commencing (P.O.C.) at the-Northeast corner of the South 1/2 of said Section 31, thence South 89o59,33,, West along the-North line of the South 1/2 of said Section 31, a distance of 2215.00 feet 'to the Northwest ~corner of the East 2215.00 feet (said East 2215.00 feet measured~a~ right angles to the East line of the South 1/2 of said Section 31) of the South 1/2 of sai~ Section 31; thence South 00o03,55,, West along the West line of the said East 2215.00 feet of the South 1/2 of said Section 31, a distance? of 53.50 feet to the South right-of-way line of the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 101 and ~he POINT OF BEGINNING (P,O.B.) of the herein described parcel: From the said POINT OF BEGINNING thence continue South 00o03,55,, West along the West line of the East 2215.00 feet of the South 1/2 of .said Section 31, a distance of 983.17 feet; thence South 89~59'33'' West parallel with the North line of the South 1/2 of said Section 31, a distance of 1180.27 feet; thence North 45~15'45'' West, a distance of 334.68 feet to the Easterly right-Of-way line of a 200 foot wide right-of-way for the Florida East thence North 44o44,15,, East along said right-of-way line, a distance of 1055 12 feet to t SoUth .ght-of-way line of said Canal ~ -~ ~- he 89°59' .~ ' ng sala South right-of-way line, a distanc 3~3'' East alo .~ _ .~ ..... ~u~; ~nence North 250.18 feet to the ~ast li ' 'e of ne of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 31; thence South 00o02,19,, West along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 31 and along the South right-of-way line of said Canal No. 101, a distance of 3.00 feet;~.thence North 89°59'33'' East along the South right-of-way line .of said Canal No. 101, a distance of 426.29 feet to the POINT OF' BEGINNING. ~ Containing 25.02 acres more or less by calculation of this legal description. Description prepared by Culpepper and Terpening, Inc. 8-24-92 FILE: 9237UA DISC: LEGALS 2 Sheet 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIViSiON TO' FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Belinda rose, Acquisition Agent I Planning & Zoning Secretary/~ August 20, 1992 File No.: PZ-92-008 Name: Charles Grunbaum Attached is a petition for a rezone . This is scheduled for the September 24, 1992 Planning & Zoning meeting. Please notify me of the existing amount.of right-of-way in this location and any additional right-of-way the County needs. The staff report will be completed and prepared for mailing ten days prior to the above scheduled meeting. /cb WP/PZDOCS/ROW cc: File att: Application MEMORANDUM TO: Technical Services Supervisor FROM.: DATE: Planning and Zoning Secretary~ SUBJECT: Posting of Public Notice for Petition of' The above Petition is scheduled for public hearing on the following date- BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ..... PLANNING & ZONING .............................. Q_ ~ .~,. ~_. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ................. ;'. /0 -'~ ~- ~ Before ~-- ~_ ~_.~, at the following location. Please implement the posting of public notice by Public Works BOA-DOCS/BOA.AGN ~ i ARc~ LOTs UN p ~vE-R PA ~ oo IN C2L.. AGE 9 OF ~,,~ RH UNIT Fm~,~LOCH 39 . . ~' ~ SX LUC1E NOTE: BASED ON PLAT CONSUL T/NC & LAND SUR 'v'£ 80.5 vfRC~INiA AV. SO, FO~T PIERCE, FL ~r chang~-~e ~ t ret~n to ~ ~ L PenSioner ~ ~Planning ~ Schedule for County C°~issi°n Review 4th Tuesday following P & Z meeting o ~3 t'rl ::~:*~i?:'.-:'.'- ~ - 0 i/:::::::?: i0 ~ : t ~:~ . _- . :.: . ~ ' ST. LUCIE COUNTY AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE I, , do hereby certify that as Agent for the St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners on the following described property: GRUNBAUM, CHARLES NORTHEAST CORNER OF PRIMA VISTA BLVD, & FLORESTA DR. (SEE ATTACHED MAP) /~-~e (NEEDS TO BE UP_...BY 9~2) I did on , 19, erect in a conspicuous place on this property the following notice: REZONING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON THIS PROPERTY FROM RS-4 TO PNRD WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, ON _9-24~92 BEFORE THE ZONING BOARD, ROOM 101, AND ON ~92 BEFORE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON THE 3RD FLOOR ANNEX, COMMISSION CHAMBERS. PETITION AVAILABLE ROOM 201. Signature Date FILE N~/NU~R I ST MEET ING TO: PLANNING DIR. FOR: CHECK Z NG DATE: TO' CHARL DATE, Charles Grunbaum 2513 S Federal Hwy Ft Pierce FL 34982 Roads Property Acquisition Div Roger PoitrasAnnex 2300 Virginia Av Ft Pierce FL 34982 Cynthia Angelos, Esq. 10570 S ~Federal Hwy Ste 30.0 Port St Lucie FL 34952 City of Port ~St Lucie 121 SW Port St LuCie Blvd Port St Lucie FL '349~84 Ii I! II II Ii !! H II Il Il H mil ~ ~ I.IJ ~ 0 II ~ ~ ~ Ii !1 ~ ~ II II II Ii II H Ii II Chi 0 0 il 0 u ~ o u ~ 0 ~ ~ o u ~ 0 u ~ ee ee ,cl: il ia, liD II II II I! II Ii ii II Ii II II II II il ~11 ~ ~ II ~ ~ JJ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ Ii ~ ~ 0 II ~ ( ~ IJ ~ II 0 ~ ~ I! !1 il II IJ II ~ il ~0 II II il II II II il II ~ 0 N 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ee ~'~ I~- ...i I-.C) l-'O ~ I-O ,-', I-O ee I...,. oo z ::3:-' e~ z o II II II I! !1 fl !! 01~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 Il 0 0 0 0 0 mil m~ 0 d ~ g =~,~ 0 ~ 0 ~Nz 0 II II ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 °" ° ~ ~ ° ~ " o ~ ~ o ~ - o ~ -" ' o~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ o~ lull ~ l[ 0 il I! ~ I! ii ~ II ~ II ~ II < II ~ II Ii Z 11 0 il ~ !1 ~ II m It X II ~ II ~ ii !i ~ Ii II I! !I II !i II I! II II I! II I, I I! II II tl It II II 0 0 Z' 0 '0 i o o 0 0 ~C gM: I-.,,,I z sm. 0 0 0 cI 0 u o c! o o I,'-0 ~ I Z 0 0 0 0 0 o~, o~ o~ o~ o~ ee ee 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ,-~ 0 LU Il I! !1 II II II _l II ,~t II (,9 II m II _i I! \ il II ~'1 II ~ II m ii C~ II C~ II ~: II II 0 I! ~-~ II I-- II U II 0 II -J II II n- !1 ~,- I! m II --s II J II ~ II :~ !1 ~ II I-- Ii c~. II ~" II m II :~ ii II m il II II !1 ii II m II C~ !1 C~ Ii ,~ II II II ~ I! Z !1 II C~: I1' m II ~ Ii ::~ il 0 II !1 I! Ii Ii II II II Ii Il !1 Il ii II II II Ii ~-~ II !1 F-- Ii Z II ~ II 0 !1 U Il ~t Ii O0 o o 0 -' z I-.-o 0 I,,.,,,1 0~0 o o C~ 0 0 .~- 0~-~ c~ c> c> 0 I z 0 0 '-r. (DO z Oo I',, O~ CD 0 I 0 ! cI o 0 0 0~=~ 3::0 (~.~ Ii !i mil II !1 ii II II II II II II II 0 0 0 0 0 mil II I1 ~ il II ~ II mil ~ ~ 0 ~t~ 0 b ~ 0 z ~ 0 z b 0 !1 il II I! ~-~ 0 I-- ~ I! II 0 0 0 0 0 mil ~ i ~i~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~11 ~ I.--0 ~ i"-I~ ~0 ~ II"O ~ ~0 Il mil mil ~ 0 ~' ~ 0 N ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 Ii O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ Ii ~0 ~0 ~0 ~0 ~0 tl Z Z ~ Ii Z Z II 011 ~ ~x % ~ % ~ % ~ ~X % mX % II II II II II II II ii II I! 0 0 0 0 0 II U ~ ~ ~ ~ {% ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ II ~ II ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ J Il ZO ZO II ~ II ~ II o o 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 O~ z ee ee ~u tu II c~. II >- II _1 ~-.~ I-- II I.-I-- I! II ~ II O0 tu II II II II II II II il II !1 il Ii II II ._1 II lull .J I! il C~II 0 I! II :~- Ii II I.~ I! ~ il ~ Ii ~ II ~ II 0 II ~ il ~ II ~ II ~ II ~ II ~ Ii ~ II Ii ~ II ~ II II Il II II II I! Ii ~ I! Z II Ii II ii II il II I! II Ii II II II II II II II II ~ II o o 0 0 0~.~ ~Z 0 C> o o 0,'-~ o o o 0 0 0 O~ o 0 0 coz -r-o Z o I IJ.i ~ o I~ C3 O '~ -.J II ,,, ,,, . .~ . II II II II II II II il II II II t~ ,~0 II II _j ~ · ~ CD II ~ ,.,.% ~ -J II .=C ~ II 13~ =1,- II ~ II ..I II u II ~ II (Z) '"" II 0 ::~ II Od r,,.. I.U II c~ II ~ II II !i icl: II II fl fl II fl II II I! II II II il fl II II II ~II II [~c II ;~, z II ~ II o il ~ il o ~ II o ~ II o II II II o II fl II II II o II o II o !1 ~ o o ~, CD 0 0 O~ z z ~ ~ ~Z ~ ~z ~ ~Z 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~0 ~0 ~0 Z ~ z ~ CD 'el' CD ~1' 011 0 ~ ~ 0 U ~ 0 U ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 U ~ ~11 I O~ N ~ O~ ~ ~ O~ ~ [ O~ ~ i O~ ~j O!C II Fl..- I--I-- ~ ::D II ~,l t~¢ ~,. I~0 ' ,,~1" ~'~J (DO 00. "~ --J II c~l c:~ ',~CO o0'~ II I! II II II II !1 il II ~ Jl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~11 ~ ~ ~ ~ u IZ ~ IZ ~ ~ II 0 ~ il II ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 .N 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 !1 ~~~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ II ~ O~ I! ~0 ~ O~ ~ I! ~0 ~ Ii ~U ~0 il ~ II N b !1 ~ 0 O~ 0 O~ ®e ee 0 0 0~.~ CZ)z: -!-. 0 ._i II ~ II er) II il ii Ii !i II il il !! II !i II II 04 II II I..., ~ ~ i ~ ~ 0 II ~ ~ ~ II Ii ~ Z II ~ ~ 0 I! ~ ~ N il 0 II ~ ~ II ~ II II II X II II ~ II II II II I il ~ II ~ II ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ o l.u ~ o I,iJ o IJJ ~ ,in II II Il il II II II Ii I! II O~ 0 II 0 ~ II ~ II II 4 II 0 ~ ~ II z II ~ ti 0~0 ~ ONO Z 000 il Ii ~ It !1 !1 ee CIO 0 mu, 0 0~-~ O~ 0 0 .J m--.,A l"-- L&J m o o 0 I.u i i C~ 0 C) MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Technical Services Supervisor Planning and Zoning Secretary~ SUBJECT: Posting of Public Notice for Petition of: The above Petition is scheduled for public hearing on the following date: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ............................. PLANNING & ZONING ... BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Please ~Befor_ ~ e at th_~ following locat'~on: implement the posting of public notice by Public Works BOA-DOCS/BOA.AGN ATTENTION: MIKE BOWERS BOB FRANK THIS SIGN TO BE PUT UP. PLEASE RETURN ASIGNED AND DATED COPY OF THIS TO SUE HARTZOG - GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION~SO IT CAN BE ADDED TO THE FILE. T H A N K Y O U. DATE SENT TO ROAD DEPT. ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY SIGNATURE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE ,' do hereby certify that as Agent for the St. Lucie County Board of-Commissioners on the following described property: GRUNBAUM, CHARLES _NORTHEAST CORNER OF PRIMA VISTA BLVD.. &' FLORESTA DR. · (SEE ATTACHED MAp) . (NEEDS TO BE UP BY 9-9-92) I did on , 19 , erect in a conspicuous place~'on this property the following notice: REZONING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON THIS PROPERTY FROM RS-4 TO _PNRD WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE, 'FORT PIERCE, ON 9-24-92 BEFORE THE ZONING BOARD, ROOM 101, AND ON 10-27-92 BEFORE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON THE 3RD FLOOR ANNEX, COMMISSION CHAMBERS. PETITION AVAILABLE ROOM 201. Signature Date DEPARTMENT OF CO--UNITY DEVELOPMENT (Growth Management Division) MEMORANDUM TO: ,' James Bass, Property Appraiser FROM: Lavinia Charles, Development ServiCes DATE: August 21, 1992 SUBJECT: Mailing Label Request - GRUNBAUM Techni ci an Please provide our mailing labels and one includes name, address, the following: 3419-530-0131-000/0 3419-530-0152-000/3 3419-530-0211-000/5 3419-530-0237-000/3 3419-530-0261-000/0 3419-530-0270-000/6 3419-530-0271-000/3 3419-530-0067-000/0 3419-540-0001-000/1 3419-540-0055-000/4 3419-540-0095-000/6 3419-540-0105-00.0/0 3419-540-0137-000/3 3419-570-0010-000/0 3421-702-0126-000/6 office with two sets of alphabetical corresponding numerical report (which property ID~s and brief description) for through through through through 3419-530-.0147-000/.5 3419-530-0186-000/0 3419-530-0216-000/0 3419-530-0245-000/2 through through through through 3419-540-0007-000/3 3419-54.0-0062-000/6 3419-540-0104-000/3 3419-540-0107-000/4 through through 3419-570-0013-000/1 3421-702-0129-000/7 3421-703-0~210-000/5 through 3421-703-0220-000/8 3421-703-0002-000/4 !3421'704-0033-000/3 through 3421-704-0039-000/5 'These labels and report are needed for Planning & Zoning COmmission :,meeting no later than August 28, 1992. .Please contact me or Sue at Extension 1583 if there are any questions. Thank you. LMC H:\WP\MEMOS\JOYCE. MEM