Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 16, 1999St. Lucie County Planning and 'Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting St. Lucie County Administration Building- Room 101 December 15, 1999 7:00 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call C. Announcements D. Disclosures AGENDA ITEM i!: ELECTION~OF OFFICERS AGENDA ITEM.'2: ~MINUTES OFTHE OCTOBER 21, 1999,. ~MEETING Action' Recommended: Approval. Exhibit #1: Minutes .of the October 21, 1999, Meeting AGENDA ITEM 3: FI:LE..:~:~:NO.,~._ ........ .~RZr997-025;~_..:~. APOSTLE~ FAITH.. cHURCH OF DELI~~CE... INC. ~- Petition 'of Apostle Faith Church of Deliverance, Inc., for a change in zoning ~om the RS-4- (Residential, Single-Family -4 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. Staff comments by Hank Flores. Action Recommended: Forward Recommendation to the Coun~ Commission Exhibit '//2: '-Staff Report and Site Location Maps AGENDA ITEM4: FILE....NO.~.:CU"99-009, ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI CATHOI,IC FOUNDATION.. INC, Petition 'of St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Foundation, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a Bingo Establishment in the CG(Commercial, 'General) Zoning District. Staff comments by Hank Flores. Action Recommended:, ForwardRecommendation to the Coun~ Commission. Exhibit//2: Staff Report and Site Location Maps Page .2 AGENDA ITEM 5: ,OTHER BUSINESS A, Other business at Board Members d~scretlo . Next regUlar Board of Adjustment meeting is .schedUled to be held .20, '2000, in Room 101 of :the St. Lucie County Chambers. ADJOURN NOTICE: electronically recorded. If a with respect to proceedings, based. UpOn 'the request of any party to the be sworn in. Any party to. the' indi vi dual testifying ,during An' yone with a Lucie hours prior to the meeting. 'that a are of the of 'the IS .wi!l St. 2¸2. PLANNING ~ ZONING COMMISSION ~VIEW: 12/15/99 File Number RZ-99-025 MEM-ORA ND~UM' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM. DATE: Planning and Zoning ommission Planning Manager (~~,~/ December 8, 1999 UBJECT: Application of Apostle Faith Church of'Deliverance, Inc., for a Change in Zoning from the 'RS-4 .(Residential, single-Family- 4 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning DiStrict. 'E~STING .ZONING: PROPOSED :ZONING: PARCEL SIZE: West side oflNorth 43~d Street, approximately 150 feet north of Avenue M . RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family- 4 du/acre) I (Institutiomq) RU (Residential Urban) 0.25 acre PROPOSED. :~-SE. ER~:~MYi TED USES: Expansion of an ExiSting Church Facility Attachment "A" ' Section 3.01.03(X) I (hsti~tional) - contains the designated uses which are .permitted by fight, permitted as an ~or permitted through the conditional use as a and 'zoning district es for that district SURROUNDING ZONING:- RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family- 4 du/acre) is located to the east, South, ancl west. I (Institutional) is located to the north. SU~OUNDING LAND USES:. The general 'existing use surr0unding' the subject property is residential..Apostle Faith Church of Deliverance, Inc. is established on the property to the north of the subject property. The Future Land Use Classification .of the immediate surrounding m:ea is RU (Residential Urban) · . UTILITY SERVICE: ~ · ~~smg~a~O~ ~~C~S shall cOnSider December 8, 1999 Page .3 Petition: Apostle Faith Church of Deliverance, Inc. File No.: CU-99-009 Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; · Conditions have not Changed so as to reqUire an amendment, 5. Whether and which 6~ aml limited to amendment would result in to the extent to which the proposed Uch publiC facffities, including but not The intended use for this rezoning is demands-on any pUblic facilities in th the will expected to create significant additional Prior to the approval of any proposed provide documentation verifying that deVelopment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result .in. significant adverse imPacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create' adverse .impacts on the natural environment. The applicant will be required to comply with all federal, state, and local environmental regulations. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of Such patterns; ~ °rderly and logical developmem pattern will occur-with this change in zoning. The s~ou~ding parcels of property are designated for residential a~d in~itutional uses. ge' Whether the proposed ~amendment. would be in conflict with the public l'nterest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed mendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the: purpose~and intent of the St. LUcie County Land Development Code. C~OMMENTS The subject property is in an area A~achment , f {h cc: ~ Leroy :BenneR, File , . Suggested motion to .recommend approval/denial .of this requested change in zoning. AFTER: CONSIDERING THE 'TESTIMONY.PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEAPdNG, INCLUDING STAFF !COMMENTS, AND THE' STANDARDS OF ~VIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11:06..03, ST. LUCiE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HE.BY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE APPLICATION OF APOSTLE FA/TH CHURCH OF DELIVERANCE, INC., FOR A ~ HANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RS-4 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY- 4 DWACRE) ..~INCj DIST~CT TO THE I (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DIST~CT, BECAUSE ...... [CITE ~ASON WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. A CONS 'THE TESTIMO~ P~SENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDA~S OFREVIEW AS SET FORTH IN ~ EC~ION 11,06.'03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY. LAND D OPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE~THAT THE PLANNING ~AND ZONING COMMISSION ~COMMENDTHAT THE. ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOA~ OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF APOSTLE FAITH C~CH OF DELI~RANCE, INC~, FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE. RS'4 (~SIDENT!AL,.SINGLE-FAMILY_ 4 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE I (!NSTITUTIoNAL) ZONING DISTP~CT, BECAUSE ..... [CITE REASON WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. 1' 'Purpose ~ under 2. permitted Uses one: t, ,~ P. mviSiOnS., -'"~6 ' LandS~pin.g Requirements :h, Fairgr°Un :s, (~) i:' ~ Funeral :and ~emato~ sO'iceS; ¢2s) i i ~ j, Theaters. (999) ' ' Adopted August 1, 1;990 132 Revised Thr°ugh 09/07/99 , :, · , . .LOt ~siZer:equire ments sh ail ,b'e ~ .. . 5. Off-street Parking and ~oading~ Requi~ements~ Off~tr%t :parking and !°adin~ roquimm~nts a~o ~ubio~t to 7, Conditional ~Uses a. ' ~Phitheaters': :(o~) e. Cultural. }e~': ~ ~: ~, o Section 3.01,03 Zoning District Use Regulations ko 131. n. O. p., q, Medical and other health services. Postal service. (43) Residential care facilities for serious, or habitual juvenile offenders. Social services Sporting .and recreational camps (7o32) Stadiums, arenas,~mce tracks (7~) --~ Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 Accessory Uses ACcessory uses .are subject to the .requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a., Drinking..places (alcohOlic beverages related to civic, social, and fratemal uses). Restaurants..(InClUding. the sale of alcoholic beverages for-on-premises consumption only.) (999) ' Funeral and crematory services. ~z2e) .... --' Dl hOme, for on-site security purposes. Adopted' August.I, 1'990 133 Revised Through 09/07/99 w ,LJ.N~O0 3380HO33NO A Petition: Zoning fro'm Faith Church of Deliverance, Inc. for a .Change in RS-4 (Residential, Single Family-4 units/acre) to ! (Institutional). Avenue "0' 16 I ,I 14_ I$ I 4 lO 7 2.0 ! 19 18 17 4 16 5 15 6 14 7 1.3 8 I~ 9 I0 , ! 8 RZ 5 This pattern subject Parcel Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised .November 29, 1999 N l.3 12 2O 19 15 · 14. 7 ~: I$ I0 12 IL N Land useAp°stle Fait'h Church' .of Deliverance, Inc. 8, ' 20 '! 13 8' II i0 · . Avenue "0' IIMII 14 7 1~ 8 /2 9 I ' - 17 4 /6 ~ 5 15. 6 z4 7 _'_~ ~ . · IJ ,8 /2 '. 9 fl L , IND R¸Z 25 This pattern-indicates subject parcel Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised .November 29,1999 i S.4 (ResidentialI Single.Family ~ ~4 du/aCre) ~ning Oist~a to the for the followin~ desOribed prope~: · ~ recorded: Ifa person:'deCides to ~a! any.:deCiSi°n.made: by nroceedin~s, and that,. to b=ed: ~ on Any Parry to me proceeding examine any individ~it mg during a hearing upon: request. be~;onsidered advance of the Public hearing wili also, - rior to this public hearing~ notice Of the same pDeCember i, 1999 St: Lucie Co *, DeC . : 5 ,un on: emb . DS' The Tribune- Friday, D~ember 3, 1999 '. , . No. 1337 . IT MAY'CONCERN: . ' iS, ARCEL B-1 (1'AX LD. NO. "M"~] .A E2 The News, Friday, December 3, 1999 ST~ LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING AND zONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA DEC:EMBER 1-5, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby' given in accordance with Sectlo~ i 1',00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land .Devet-' Opment Code. and the ProVisions of; Planning and consider their following request: i~ ~I. APOSTILE FAITH CHURCH OFI al) Zoning described:property;: . Section-6, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, Sunl~nd Gardens, Se~on 4, Block 51, the southerly '~ of Lot 5 and all of Lot 6 (0,!29 AC) (OR rt232'730). (Tax I.D. N°. 2406-506..0077-000/5). (LOcation: 'West side of North 43rd ~treet, approximately 150 feet north of.Avenue "M"). 2. ST..FRANCIS OF ASSISI'CATH- OLlC SCI-IOOL FOUNDATION, Plat Public Florida, ~as described as follows: Beginat the point of inters~ion, of! theWester.ty right,of;waY tine of FlOrida State ROad No. 5 (U~S, t)'~ and the north line of said Lot 6;i thence South 27~1'40" East along' said .westerly right,of.way line of Florida Stat~ Road No. 5 (U,S. i) for 465.00 feet; thence South 62°28'20'' WeSt for 350~00 feet; thence North 27°31'40" West for 589.7t feet; 'thence Northl 00~00'19'' East along, a line paral-I lei to the west.line of Said Lot 6 forI 79.73 feet toa point Of intersectioni on the north line of said Lot 6;t thence South 89°42'28" East alongt t the north line of ~sald Lot 6 forI 368.77 feet to the Point of Begin'l ning. SubjeCt to the-north 1.6 feet and the southeasterly 30 feet for road, utility and drainage purposes. PARCEL B-1 That portion of Lots 5, 6,. and 7 of Block 3, Section 26; Township 36 South, Range 40 East, Plat No. 1 of St. Lucie Gardens as recorded in~ Plat Book 1, at page 35 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, j Florida, described as follows:J Commence at the point of intersec-! tion of the westerly right.of,way of' State Road No. 5 (U.S. 1) and the north line of said Lot 6; thenCe North 89°42'48'? West along 'the l north line of Lot 6, 358.77 feet Jo the Point of Beginning; thence con- tinue NOrth 89°42'2~'' West along aforesaid line 60.00 feet; thence South 00°00'19'' West, '2130.00 feet; thence South 89°59'4i" East 142.87 feet; thence North 27°31'40" West 179.27 feet; i o '1" thence North 00 00 0 East~ 70.73 feet to the Point of Beginning. Less the north twenty (20) feet of the above described parcels. (Tax I.D. No. 3414-50 t. 1905-050/4). (Location: 8421-8453 South U.S. Highway No. 1 .(St. Lucie Palm Center) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held .in Room 101, St. LuCie County Administration Buil~ling, 2300 Vir- ginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on December 15, 1999, beginning at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Anyone with a disability requir- ing accommodation to attend this; .meeting should contact the St. Luciei County Community Services Man-' ager at 561/462.1777 or TDD 561/462-I 428 at least forty.eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any deci. sion made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he 'will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evi. dence upon which the appeal is to be based. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/CARSON MCCURDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN Pub.: Dec. 3, 1999 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 12/1.5/99 File Number CU-99-009 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: DATE: Planning and Zoning CommisSion Planning Manager December 8, 1999 UBJECT: LOCATION: Application of St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Foundation, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Bing° Establishment in the CG (Commercial,~.General) Zoning District. ONING DESIGNATION. 8421 So_uth U.S. Highway No. 1 CG (Commercial, General). L~D [[SE DESIGNATION:. COM (Commercial) PARCEL .,SIZE : 9,000 square feet of playing area PROPOSED USE: Bingo Establishment SURROUNDING Z. NING. The subject property is surrounded by the. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. SURROUND~G L~D USES: The subject property, is.-surrounded 'by the COM (Commercial) Future Land Use ClassifiCation. The general use of the surrotmding property is commercial retail. FIRE. MS PROTECTION: Station #12 (Walton Road) is located approximately 1 mile to the south of the subject property. UTILITY SERVICE: Utility service is provided by Port St. Lucie Utilities. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing fight-of-way width for South U.S. Highway No. 1 is 200 feet. December 8,. 1999 Page 2 SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS:' · None at this time.' TYPE OF CON.CU~NCY DOCUMENT ~QUI~D: Certificate of Capacity. ST., LUCIE .COUNTY In revieWing t~s application'~ -for - proposed c°nditiona1. ~ . use, the:-P! and Zoning c°mmission shall conSider ~and-make the following determinations: ® .... . ~ ..... let with an ~a r ble po~on Whether the proposed condffional.use is in confl ...- y pP : ~ ~ .' cieCoun . Land Development Code; ~ of.the .St, Lu ~ :-. ty: .... ~ . The' 2~ e Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditionaluse would 'have, an ~pro. pert~-e ~ ~ adverse impact on nearby '~ "s' -The Proposed,conditiOnal use. is-not expected :to., proP~rti~s. The subject pr°pe~y is 1°c~ted in 'Whether.and the extent re. which the~Proposed eon hal serVed e public facilitieS in this area, 'Prior to .any site plan demonstrate that the project will be served by adeqUate Whether and the extent to :which significant adVerse impacts on the natural ',natural environment: :The proposed ~e any the Decer~tber 8, 1999 Page 3 Petition: St, Francis of Assisi File No.- CU-99-009 bingo establishment must comply with all local, state, and federal regulations concerning its development and operation. 'The applicant,. St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Foundation, has applied for the requested conditional use in~order~to establish a ~non-profit bingo parlor. Bingo establishments are allowed as a conditional use in this .zoning district upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners. otaff finds that this petition meets the standards of.review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St.' Lucie~County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the .St, Lucie CoUnty Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County. Commissioners with a recommendation of approval; with th~ following condition: --' o .. The Board .of COunty. Co.mmlssioners' ' shall reserve the right to review 'the conditional use permit on.a bi-annual b~a,s~s' to ensure that adequate parking is provided for the entire shopping center. If parking required for St. Francis of Assisi Catholic '~oundatlon, Inc, is found to be creating capacity problems for the shopping, center, the Board of County Commissioners may impose restrictions on the hours of operation. Please.contact this ~office if you.have any questions on this matter. Attachment. hf CC: Donald W. Miller, Esquire File SUggeSted motion to'..mco~end apProVal/denial of this requested conditional' Use,. ~T.ER CONSIDE~G T~ TEST P~SENTED D G THE.p~L~ HE G, INCLUD~G S'T~F COUNTS, ~' THE ST~~S OF ~VIEWASSET FORTH'IN SECTION 11,07,.03, ST. LUC~ C Y MOVE . . THAT THE PLANNING ~ 'ZO~G CO~iSSION ~CO~ . ST. LUC~ CO~TY BO~ 'OF CO~TY COMMISSIONERS GRANT ~PR~~ TO '~THE ~PLICATION OF ST. F~CiS ~OF ASSISI'~ . A CO~ITIONAL uSE PE~IT :TO' ~LOW A 'B~GO: EST~LiS~ ~ ~'THE CG (COMMERCI~, G ) ZO~GDIS T, B~ECAUSE ... ~ · ~C S~F'CO -, S .S OF. ~ ~.i~T FORTH ~ CO~TY BO~ OF' CO~TY COMM~ ISSi DE~ THE.~P~, ~,~ ...... ON ~OF ST. F~NCiS OF ASSiSI CATHOLIC FOUNDATION, INC'.. FOR A TI 'USE. PE~IT 'T'O..~,LOW A B O..EST~LIS~ENT ~ THE CG(CO , ZO~G DISTRICT, BECAUSE .... [CITE ~ASON(S) ~Y - PLEASE BE SPECWIC] S, . . Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations CG Purpose COMMERCIAL, GENERA~ l~_~ The purpose of .this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for a wide variety of commercial uses intended to serve a population over a large market area, which" do not impose undesirable noise, 'vibration, odor, dust, or offensive effectS on the surrounding area, together with such otheruses as maybe necessary to and compatible with general commercial surroundin, s Th ~ ' r.. .. ~ . · ~ g'. !e ~umber ~n 0 following each ~denbfied use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined'in Section 2,00,00 of this code. Permitted Uses a. e. g. h. i. j. k. II. O. P. q. r. $. t. U. ¥. W. X. y. Z. bb. gg. Con CUltural DuPliCating, Adjustment/collection & credit reporting services (732) Advertising (73~) Amphitheaters Amusements & recreation services - exceptstadiums, arenas, race tracks, amusement parks and bingo parlors (z~) Apparel & accessory stores (ss) Automobile dealers (ss) . Automotive rental, repaim & serv. (except body repairs) Beauty-and barber services Building materials' hardware and .garden supply Cleanin 734~) COrn CommunicatiOns - except towers Computer programming, data processing & other computer serv. (office & interior.storage only) and nature exhibitions (~) g, commercial, art/photo. & stenog, serv, (581) except public schools ¢2) I, research, management & related services and leasing services and judicial functions Fa~ management services' (o?s)-. '- '~ Financial, insurance, and.mai estate ~Food stores Funeral and crematory services Gasoline service stations (ss4~) . . General merchandise stores Health services Home furniture and fumishings Landscape & .horticultural services Laundry, cleaning and garment services .(~=~) ~ . MemberShip organizations - except for religiOus organizations as' provided in Section 8.02,01(H) of this code (~) Miscellaneous retail (see SIC Code .Major Group 59): (1) Drug stores (2) Used merchandise stores (3) Sporting goods (4) Book & stationary Adopted August 1, 1990 118 Revised Through 09/07/99 Zoning .3. 4,. hh. .o tl- kk. !1. mm, nh. oo o PP. -qq. rr. SS. tt. UU. W. (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) -(11)~ .Jewelry Hobby, toy and .games Camera;& phOtographic supplieS (5~4~) Gifts, novelty and souvenir (16) (17) Miscellaneous (1) (2) ,Misc..retai Miscellaneous (2') (3) (4) (5) · .Mobile food ven Motion pi Museums Pets Photo s (propane) (s.~e4): ,Code:for specific uses) (5999) .(see SiC Code. Major Group. 72): '382) .SIC Code Major Group 73): ': r services-¢3sl) ~ · & :vegetables'retail) (~) . parking & .vehicle storage,. ~r/s~). .gardens (s4) · (1) Individual ~ .soCial' se~ices (2) Child. care (3) Job ~training and vocational: rehabilitation Se~iCes.(~) Travel agencies V e ted n a ry .s e~ices (074) Sales0nlY' eXCePt as.Provided in $~~n' 7;0.0,00. . , Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements,shall.be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. .Dimensional RegUlations Dimensional requirements, Shall ibe in .accordance with Section 7.04,00- . Off-street Parking and Loading .Requirements Adopted,, August 11 1990 119 Revised Th.rough .09/07199 . . Section .3,01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. Landscaping -Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. Conditional USes a. Adult establishments_ subject to requirements of Sec. 7.10.10. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) - free-standing. Disinfecting & pest control services. (7~42 Amusement .parks. (?~) · Go-cart tracks. & motels. oods warehousing and storage-mini-warehouses Marina - recreational boats only. vehicle repair services- body repair. .ps. (7o32) (1) Stad~ Tele~ Accessory USes race tracks. ect to the standards of Section 7 10.23 Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the. following.:, a~ bi C. Drinking~placeS (alcoholicbevemges as an accessory use to a restaurant and/or civic, social, and fratemal organizations). ... One single-family dwelling unit contained within the commercial building, or a detached- single-family dwelling or mobile home, (for on-site security purposes). Retail trade: (1) Undistilled alcoholic beverages (accessory to retail sale of food). Adopted August I 1990 120 Revised Through 09/07/99 o .,_..,/ s )'£ ,J, s s~ t s 9~ ! XI_NrIOO 33~]0H0331~0 USe Permit to Allow Zoning DiStrict, A Petition of St.: Francis of Assisi Catholic SChOol Foundation, Inc. for a Conditional a Bingo Establi~shment in the CG (Commercial, General) I I 1 I I i ! ! I I ! Drive Me'diterroneon I · - Boulevard South I I I' I I i I I ! I I ! 'avanna Club Boulevard C.U 99 -009 This pattern indicates sUbjrec[ parcel ty lop e Communi Deve. m nt Geographic Information. stems · Map. revised November 29, 1999 'INs map h~ been ~' f~ ~al plan~ ~ mf~ ~ ~. ~ ~ eff~ ~ ~ rode to p~ ~ ~st ~ent a~ ~e ~f~ ~. ~ · ~ ~t~ f~ use ~ a ~ ~i~ ~~ N liC $¢hOO ,P-UD-' 1 ,1 1 I i I ! I ! i Medi oneon 'South C.U 9 '1 i I ! I - t I i RMH-5 ! ! I patte'rn, ind:icates information possible, it is ovon: B O,ule v or d 'N Land RU St. Use Francis of Assisi Catholic School Foundation, ! I .i Mediterranean ! 1 i I ! I !. I I I I 1 I ! i RU Boulevard South IN'D _CU ! I ! Savanna Club Boulevard 99'-009 This pattern indicates subject parcel Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised November 29, 1999 This map has been compiled for general planning and reference purposes only. While every effort has-been made to provide Ihe most cu4'rent 8ncl 8ccurate infon'nation possible, it is not intended lor use as a legally binding document. N THURSDA Y, December 15, 1999- 7:00 P.M. Petition~of St,. Francis of Assisi.'CatholiC FOun n, Inc., for a ~onal. Use 'Permit m allow the operation'ofa Bingo Establishmem in ~the .CG (Commercial, Geneml:): ~ning District 'for the folloWing deSCribed propers: (Location:. 8421 South U.S. HighWay, ,No.· 1) Please note'.that .all prOceedings before the Local' Planning Agen~ia~ electronically- recorded. If a person decides· w appeal: any'decision l made by the Local Pla~~:~ ~ ~,~· ~Agen~.,,. . with. · respect to any matter considered at. such meeting or.~hearing, he will ne~· a record of the prOceedings, and-that, for such pu~ose,, he-~~ need .to. ensure.that a.~ verb~, record~ of the proceedings is. made, which :record.:i appeal is to be based. Upon the request'~of, any pa~ w 'the proceeding,, individuaIS ~ a · hearing Mll .be .sWOm, in.: ~Any party 'to the pr°ceeding will 'be gra an~ :i,~ to cross- examine any individual .testi~ing~ during,a'hearing' ~up°n request..~ Wri~en~ ents ,received in advance of the public hearing will also be ~considered. PriOr w thiS.Public hearing'~ notice ofthe same-wassent~ w all a~C~.~ ,.. ~ rty ~owners December 1, 1999. '! Legal~notice was published in'the POn St. Lucie ' and ~e Tribune,' newspapers of general~.circulation in St. Lucie Count, on December3, 1999, ibune ° Friday, .December 3, 1999', I .No. 1337 TO .WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: "NOTICE 'is Planning I request: ' 1.' APOSTLE FAITH ,CHURCH , Change in.. ZOning lrom ,4 du/acre} zoning District for the "fOllowing 'SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 35 GARDENS', SECTION 5 ~(OR (Location: "M".:) ,. 2. ST..FRANCIS · , .INC,,. for a Establishment in , ' DishiCl for lhe following "i~ARCEL A . THAT PORTION OF LOTS 5, 6;., 25. TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, 'LUCRE -THE PUBLIC DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN .AT THE POINT · RIGHT OF WAY THE NORTH 'LINE ROAD NO. 5 (,~E'~ 'FO~ 5'89.71 F;~,RALLEL TO - 'PC~NT OF THENCE LOT 6 FOR 368.77 TO' THE NORTH. ROAD. UTILITY AND _i O, ARCEL B,1 LESS :THE NORTH TWENTY ~PARCELS. ',; . · ' ~.iT,,~'AX t:D, NO,, 3414,501-] 905'050/41;' "".., ';i;'.':' (LocatiOn:' 842.1-8453 ,~uth CSt. LuCie ., meeting; decides and. verbatim ',~ includes · --is fo be Publish: December 3, 1999 "' ' , .... E2 The News, F:riday, 'December 3, 1999 ST. LUCtE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA DECEMBER 15, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given .in accordance with Section 11:00.03 of the St, Lucie COunty Land Devel- opment Code and the provisions of. tl~e St. Lucie County Cc~mprehensive Plbn, the following appli~:aots have J requested that the St~ Lucte c°Untyl Planning and Zoning :COmmissio~ consider their following request: I 1, APOSTLE FAITH CHURCH OF DELIVERANCE, INC., fOr a ChangeI the J~S-4 (Residen- .Family- 4 ~du/acre)i the I (Institution-' i 'District for the following Section 6,~ 35 South, Sunland Gardens,- , the southerly ½ L°t ~6 (O.29 AC) I,D. No.. North '43rd 150 feet 2. ST. FRANCIS'OF ASSISI CATH- OLIC SCHOOL: FOUNDATION, INC., for a Conditi°na!Use Permit to allow 'Establishment inI, General); the followingi Block 3, of Plat Book !Lots 5, 6and 7ofi ~of of and the thence South'. said westerly ine of Florida State No. 5 (U,S. I)' for 465.00 thence South 62°28'20', thence North 21 West for 589.71 thence lei to the west i 79.73 feet lo a of intersection: on the north of said Lot 6;i thence South 2'28" East alongJ ithe north line Lot .6 f0r/ 368.77 feet to t Begin..I ning. Subject feet and-the soulh~ 30 feet for road, 'utility an; drainage purposes, PARCEL That portion of Lots 5, 6, and 7 of Block 3, Section 26; Township 36 South, Range 40 East, Plat No. 1 of St. Lucie Gardens as recorded in! Plat Book I, at page 35 of the' Public Records of St. Lude County, Florida, described as follows: Commence at the point of intersec- tion of the westerly right-off'ray of State Road No. 5 (U.S. 1) and the north line of said Lot 6; thence North 89°42'48'' West along the north line of Lot 6, 358.77 feet to the POint of Beginning; thence con- flnue North 89 42 28 West along aforesaid line 60.00 feet;, thence South 00°00'19'' West, 230.00 I:eet~ thence South 89°59'41'' East 142.87 feet; thenc· North o '~t Il 27 31 40 West 179,27 feet;~ thence North ~00°00'10" East 70.73 feet to the Point of Beginning. Less the north twenty (20~ feet of the abOve described parcels.. (Tax LD. N6. 3414.501 - 1905-050/4). (Location: 8421-8453 South U.S. Highway No. I (St. Lucie Palm Center) PUBLIC HEARINGS Will be held in Room 101, SL Lucie County Admlnistration Bull.ding, 2300 Vir- glnla Avenue, Foal Pierce, Florida on December ! 5, 1999, beginning at 7:00 P.M. or as soon-thereafter as possible. Anyone with a disability requir- lng acCOmmodation to attend this l meeting should contact the St. Lucie! Count~: Community 'Sen/ices Man. ager bt 561/462-1777 or :TDD. 5~1/462.1428 at least forty.eight (48) hoUrs prior to the. meeting. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a. person decides to appeal any deci- sion made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter Considered at a meeting or hearingl he ~ill need a recor~ of the prOCeedings, and that, for such purposes, he ~nay need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings is made, which record includes, the testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal is to be based. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ST. LUClE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/CARSON MCCURDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN Pub.: Dec. 3, 1999 NOTICE TO P&Z BOARD ~MEMBERS There will be a special P&Z/LPA m,eeti .ng- January 24, 199.9 (4th Thursday in January), to review t'he Capital Improvemen.ts Element a:nd m~ake final r¢~-commendations to forward the plan to the County .Commission. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE VEL OPMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Members ,FROM: Dawnelle Lewis, Recording Secretary DATE: December 15, 1999 SUBJECT: MS. DREYER Ms. Dreyer will not be at tonight's meeting. She has a conflicting appointment. Thankyou. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE VEL OPMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Members Dawnelle Lewis, Recording Secretary December 15, 1999 MS. DREYER Ms. Dreyer will not be at tonight's meeting. She has a conflicting appointment. Thank you. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE VEL OPMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Members Dawnelle Lewis, Recording Secretary December 15, 1999 MS. DREYER Ms. Dreyer will not be at tonight's meeting. She has a conflicting appointment. Thankyou. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE VEL OPMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: FROM.. DATE: SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Members Dawnelle Lewis, Recording Secretary December 15, 1999 MS. DREYER Ms. Dreyer will not be at tonight's meeting. She has a conflicting appointment. Thank you. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE VEl, OPMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Members FROM: Dawnelle Lewis, Recording Secretary DATE: December 1.5, 1999 SUBJECT: MS. DREYER Ms. Dreyer will not be at tonight's meeting. She has a conflicting appointment. Thank you. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE VEL OPMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM,. TO: Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Members FROM:' Dawnelle Lewis, Recording Secretary DATE: December 15, 1999 SUBJECT: MS. DREYER Ms. Dreyer will not be at tonight's meeting. She has a conflicting appointment. Thankyou. St' 'Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting St. LuCie County Administration Building- Room 101 December 15, 1999 7:00 P,M. AGENDA CALL. TO ORDER A. Pledge':of Allegiance B. Roll Call C. Announcements D. Disclos~es AGENDA ITEM 11. ELECTION.OF OFFICERS AGE~A iTEM~.2: MiNUTES..OF iTHEOCTOBER 21, 1999, MEETING Approval. Exhibit#l: Minutes of the OctOber 21, 1.999, Meeting AGENDA ITEM 3: FILE .... ..NO .... ~... R7~99,.025. APOSTI.E .FAITH. ~[tliRClt_~)_E DELI~~NCE, INC, :. Petition:of Apostle Faith Church .of Deliverance, Inc., for a change in zoning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family-4 du/acre) Zoning District to the'I (Institutional) Zoning-DistricL Staff comments by Hank Flores. · . Action Recommended: Forward Recommendation to the County Commission Exhibit #2: Staff Report and Site Location Maps AGENDA ITEM4: FILE NO.~. CU,99,009, ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI~ CATHOI~IC FOUNDATION, INC, Petition of.St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Foundation, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation.of a Bingo Establis~ent in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. Staff comments by Hank Flores. Action Recommended: .Forward Recommendation to the County Commission.. Exhibit #2: Staff Report and Site Location Maps Page 2 AGENDA ITEM 51 OTHER BUSINESS Other business at Board Members" .discretion. Next regular Board of AdjuStment meeting is ~scheduled to be 20, 2000, in Room 101 of.:thel St. Lucie Chambers. .Commission ADJOURN NOTICE: All proceedings before the-Board with respect to any matter considered ~at such meeting ~or he~ng, he proceedings, and that, i~~e proceedings is made, based. Upon the request of any-party to the proceedings, individua~ls be sworn in. Any -to the will be individual tes request. Anyone with a Lucie hours prior to the ~meeting. Any at 561/ be :referred tothe St.'Lucie COunW are f the Will any PLANNING ~ ZON~G COMMISSI'ON REVIEW: 12/15/99 File Number RZ-99-025 MEMORANDUM DEPART~NT OF .COMMUNITY DEVELOPME~ TO: FROM::' DATE: Planning and Zoning_f~o~mrnission Planning Manager December 8, 1999 SUBJECT: Application of Apostle Faith Church-of Deliverance, Inc., for a Change in .Zoning~ from the. RS-4 .(Residential, 4 du/acre)Zoning District to 'the I (Institutional) Zoning [ct. LOCATION: West side of North 43~a Street, approximately .150 feet n°rth ofAv - "' '" '-enue ~v~ .. E~STI!NG ZONING: RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family- 4 du/acre). PROPOSED ZONING: I (Institutional) P~CEL SIZE: RU (Residential Urban) 0.25 acre PROPOSED .USE: Expansion'of an Existing Church Facility SURROUNDING,ZONiNG: Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(X) I (hstimtional) - contains the desi~ated uses which ~e permitted by fight, permitted as an accessory, use, or permi~ed through 'the conditional use process, use as a ~ ~s ,, is required to "Conditional u. e approvals. Any use not fOund the district regUlations are designated as prohibited uses district SU .RROUNDING LAND USES:i The ~general existing use surrounding the subject property is residential. Apostle Faith Church of Delix)eranCe, Ine'. is established on the property to the no~h of the subject prope~y. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) UTiLiTY SERVICE: ", mSPORTATIO IMPACT .WAy ' GHT'OF ~EQUACY: ' The:: ' 'CO eurrenCYDefe~a!Affldavit Wh~ther the:: Lucie coun~ December 8, 1999 Page ~3 PetitiOn: Apostle Faith Church of DeliVerance, Inc. File No.: CU-99-009 4, 5' Whether there haVe been changed cOnditions that reqUire an~ amendment; · Conditions have not. changed so as to require, an' amendment. Whether to which the proposed amendment Would result in demands ~ facilities, amendment WoUld exceed of such ut not sewage water sup [ : r~ · m t anser, and-, The intended demands on ~any public facilities Will in'place expected to create significant additional this area, Prior t° the approval bf any prOPosed .to provide documentation verifying that development. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would' result .in. significant adverse impacts Onthe natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to .create 'adverse impacts on the. natural enviroment. 'The applicant will be required to comply with all federal,.state, and e · Whether and affects of such patterns; .r amendment would result in an pattern specifically identifying any negative uses. pattern will occ~ with this change in zoning. of property are designated for residential and" insti nal .8o ' Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in 'harmony with. the purpose and intent of this Code; The-proposed amen~ent would not be in conflict with.the public interest and is in harmony With the purpose and intern of the St. Lucie County Land Development.. Code, ' COMMENTS The petitioner, zo~ng ZOffing Dis~¢t.in order to The subject property is in aa Church of Deliverance, Inc., has requested this change in ingle-Family- 4 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (institutional) facility on the subject~property, al uses. ' ~ wou~o : , ARachment hf cc: , : Suggested .motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested change in zoning. MOTION TO APPROVE;_ A~ER' CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED iDURtNG'THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF 'COMMENTS, AND THE STANDA~S OF ~VIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCRE 'COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE'THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~COMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOA~ OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT.APPROVAL TO THE APPLICATION OF APOSTLE FAITH CHURCH OF DELIVERANCE, INC., FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING 'FROM THE RS-4 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 4 DU/ACRE) ZONING DIST~CT TO THE I (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE ..... [CITE ~ASON WHY- PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. MOTION TO ~DF. Ny: A ..,ONS~ G THE 'TESTiMO~ PRESENTED D~G THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET' FORTH IN ECTION 11,06.03, ST. LUCIE ~COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY SMOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~COMMEND' THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOA~ OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPHCATION DELIVE~CE, INC., FOR A CHANGE iN ZONING FROM THE RS-4 (~SIDENTIAL, SINGLE.FAMILY- 4 DU/ACRE) ZONING DIST~CT TO THE I (INSTiTUTIoNAL) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE. .... [CITE ~ASON WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. PHmo~P.' , PermiEed uses. ' b. ,Famil,, ~ one d; e~ 3'. "~ Lot.,'i $,ze Requ,rements' ~,, i,?.; ... , . Lot Shallbein a~cordance With section 7:04;o0, · 4, :~Dimensional :Regulati0ns :.: · r~ luirements ~tr,~!i~bj~ ale section ' ;6' Landscaping Requirements H :Lands~ping requirements ;re Subject to Sectien 7i09~00: i ' ii 7' ; Conditional:UseS: ~ ;: i, j. Theaters, AdOpted August1' ;1990: 132 , . Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations o k~ Ill. n. O. P, q. Medical and 'other health services. (so) Postal service. (43) I juvenile offenders. and recreational camps (7032) Stad race tracks Telecommuni ~c~tion towers - subject to the .standards of Section 7.10.23 ~(~) Accessory Uses Accessory uSes am subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following- ao (sss) Funeral (alcoholic beverages related to civic, soCial, and fratemal uses). (including the sale of~alcoholic beverages for on-premiSes consumption only.) services. dormitories; or mobile home, for on-site security; purposes. Adopted August 1,r 1990 133 ReVised 'Through 09/07199 S ti L S ~ J. ~LNCIO0 33'~OHO33NO A Petition Zoning from · · of Apostle Faith Church of Deliverance, inc. for a Change in RS-4 (Residential, Single Family-4 units/acre)to I0 fl Avenue i (Institutional) 14 7 .11 , I0 !1011 16 I I tO IIMII 15. 6 14 .-.7 12 , 9 il !0 RZ indicates Community Development._ Geographic Information Systems Map revised November 29, 1999 ~ e ~ery e~or~.. ~ been rnacl~ ~o provide the mosl currant and ~ccurate ofrnat~n possible, it Is not in~endecl for use as a legally binding ~. N // 5 IL 9 5 klformetk~ S Land Use //6 aith 2O I 21 Church of Deliveran.ce, Inc. // Avenue "0' t-lE-'J ! ~1 17 4 I 14~ ,.T --, 16 5 ---~ ~ '1 -' ' IJ I 4 ...... 4__.3__  , ,. , II ,.. ...... ~~ '15 - - 8 9 ' 8_. II .10 .... II II .... 'IND RZ Community.' Development Geographic Information'Systems Map revised 'November 29,1999 ~h~ ~. i ~S ~ ~t~ f~.~ ~ a ~ ~i~ ~t. N RS-4 (ReSidential' single'Fami¢ ' 4 dU/acre) '. ~'Piease nOte ::that: alt ,: ~recorded: If apers°n deCideS t° aPP~al any ~decisiOn ~ respect to any :matter , proceeds' and,that, fOr.sUch PUt,sei he::~: need :ens:urethat a · December 1' !999. Legal~nOtice was PUblished: in the LUCF neWSpapers of generai cirCulation in , , i , to be based. Up°n the request ofany pa~ w:thepwceeding; a hearing will be sw°rn in' ~ Pr°ceeang wilt oe : exa i ,: nY: i , i i,a a l uring upon V itten :recei * in I)8-- The Tribune · :Friday, D~ember 3, 1'999 ', · No. 1337 ".~RCEL B-1 THE ' LESS THE NORTH ...... PARCELs. " :E.,CHAIRMAN Publish"December 3,1999". :; ;.. ~ ,,~- · The .News, Friday, December 3, '1999 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE ts hereby given in accordanCe with Section 11'.00.03 of the St. Lucie COuntY~Land Devel- oPment Code and the provisions of Planning and Zoning COmmission consider their following request: istrict to the I (lnstitution-i District. for the tat'lowing~ property: i, Township 35 South, (0:29 AC) ~ax LD. No. rd 150 feet 2. ST. FRANCIS OF ASSiS1 CATH- OLIC SCHOOL .FOUNDATiO~N, INC~, fora Conditional. Use Permit~ tO allow properly: PARCEL A That portion o~ ~Lots 5, 6 and 7 of Public Records the westerly right,of, way. line .of: Florida Sta~e RC~ad No, 5 (U.S. and the n,or~h line of said Lot thence South 27°31'40''r East along' said westerly right, of-waytine of. Florida State Road No. 5.(U~S. 1) for 465.00 feet; thence South o , 62 28 20' West for 350,00' feet; lhence North 27°31'40" West for 589.71 feet; thence North 00°00'19" East along a tine paral- lel to the west line of said Lot 6 for 79.73 feet to a point of intersection' on the north line of said Lot 6; thence South 89°42'28'' East alongJ the north line of said Lot 6 fo-9-.r 368.77 feet to the Point of BeginS.! ning. Subject to the north 16 feet and the southeasterly 30 feet for road, utility and drainage purposes. PARCEL B-1 That podion of Lots 5, 6, and 7 of Block 3, Section 26; Township 36 South, Range .40 East, Plat No. 1 of St, Lucie Gardens as recorded Plat Book 1, at page 35 of the' Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: Commence at the point of intersec- ~ ,ion of the westerly right.of.way of i State Road No. 5 (U.S. 1) and the north line of .said Lot 6; thence North 89°42'48'' West along the north line of Lot 6; 358.77 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence con- . ' o t ,, tmue North 89 42 2'8 West along aforesaid line 60.00 feet; thence · o i ii W ' South 00 00.19. est, 230.00 feet; thence South 89°59'41" East 142.87 feet; t:hen.ce NOrth 27°3.1'40'' West 179,27 feet; thence North 00°00'10'' Eastl 70.73 feet to the Point of Beginning. Less the north .twenty (20) feet of 'the above described parcels. (Tax I.D. No.. 3414,501 - 1905.050/4). (Location: 8421--8453 South Highway No. i (St. Lucie Palm C~nter) PUBLIC HEARINGS wilt be held in Room 101o St. Lucie County Administration Building, 230'0 Vir- ginia AvenUe, Fort' Pierce, FlOrida on December 15, 1999, beginning at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Anyone with a disability requir- ing accommodation to attend this~, meeting should contact the St. Lucie! 286.0105, ~Florida Statutes,. if a person decides to appeal any deci- sion made by a boa~d; agency, or commission With respect t6 any matter considered at. a meeting Or hearing, he ~vilt need a reCord of the proCeedings, and that, for such purposes, he may. need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal is to be based. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/CARSON MCCURDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN Pub.: Dec. 3, 1999 ,,, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 12/15/99 File Number CU-99-009 ME MO RAND UM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: DATE: Planning and Zoning :Commission Planning Manager 4~' December 8, 1999 SUBJECT: LocATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: Application of St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Foundation, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Bingo Establishment in the CG (Commemial, General) Zoning District. ~ - 842.1 South U.S. Highway.No. 1 CG (Commemial; General) LAND. USE DESIGNATION:. COM (C°mmereial) PARCEl., SIZE: 9,0-00 square feet of playing area PROPOSED USE: Bingo EstabliShment . SURROUNDING NG: The .subject property is surrounded by the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning Dis~ct. SU~RROUNDING LAND USES: The subject 'property is surrounded by the COM (Commercial) FUture Land USe .Cl~sification. 'The general use ~of the.surrounding property' is commercial retail.' FIRE/EMS_PROTECTiON: ' Station #12 (Walton Road)' is located approximately 1. mile to the south of the subject property. UTILITY SERVICE: Utility service is provided by' Port St. Lucie Utilities. T~SP,ORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The eXisting fight-Of-way width for South'U.S. Highway No. 1 is 200 feet. Page 999 ' :~' ' SCHEDULED None at this ~time. TYPE .OF CONCU~NCY DOCUMENT ~QUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. ST~DARDS OF ~VIEW AS SET FORTH iN SECTION sT. LUCiE COUNTY In reVi~ewing this applicatiOn .for proposed conditional use,~ the, ~P1 · and. zoffing Co~ission shall :conSider and make the. following deteminations:~ l.e Whether the proposed conditional, use l .of the St. conflict ~th any cable portion,_ The' proposed conditi uSeis not in. eo~ict with ~y Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01, General) Zoning Disffiet, .ailows bingo establis'hments Board of County Co ssion approval. of. the St. e ' Whether and .the.extent to.. which ,the proposed condRional Use~.would have ,an e ' ' 'The pmp0sed c iti0nal properties. The. subject property Whether and-the-extent :to .Which th ~ proposed . , , . ~ ,, - . e e. · , ,. ,..e e' '- by- adequate :p:u;bhc facffities and servlc ~s, e public facilifiesin this'~ea, Prior to'any site plan demonstrate that the project Whether,and the extent to which the p: significant adverse impacts on the natural envirOnment: The proposed-conditional ~use is. not anticipated to must Id result in on the December 8, 1999 Page 3 Petition: St. Francis of Assisi File No.- CU-99-009 bingo establishment must comply with ail local, state, and federal regulations concerning its development and operation. COMMENTS The 'applicant, St. Francis. of Assisi Catholic Foundation~ has applied for the requested conditional.use in.order to establish anon-profit bingo parlor. Bingo establishments are allowed as a conditional 'use in'this zoning district upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners. Staff finds that this petition meets .the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land. Development Code and is not in conflict with the gOals, objectives, and policies ~of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.. Staff recommends that you forward this petition 'to 'the Board of Co~ty Commissioners with a recommendation of.approval, with the following condition: The Board of County Commissioners shall reserve the right to review the 'conditional use permit on a bi-annual basis to ensure that adequate, parking is provided for'the entire sho ~ping center. If Parking req.uired for St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Ine. is found to be creating capacity problems, for the shoppingeenter, the Board of COunty,, omm~ss~oners.may impose restrictions on the. hours of operation, Please ~comact 'this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf CC: Donald W. Miller, Esquire File ~SUggested motion to reco~end approvaVdenial of this .requested condifional~use. AFTER CONSm O T~ TES-T~ONY P~SENTED D THE P~LiC HEARING, 1NCL~~G ST~F COMMENTS, ~.THE ST~~'S OF ~V~W ~ SET FORTH SECTION 11;07:03, ST. LUCIE C Y CO~TY BO~d) OF CO~TY COMMISSIONERS THE APPLICATION' CO~iTION~ USE" PE~iT 'TO ~LOW A BINGO EST~LiS :~.!~ THE-CG (CO~ERCI~, ) Z G DIST~CT, BECAUSE MOTION TO D : [LIST CO~ITiON(S)] T ~ PL G Z GC SSION O ST, CO~TY BO ~OF C TY COMMISSI S-DE~'T~ ~PLIC~ION OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI CATHOLIC FOUNDATION' INC. FOR A C ~iON~ USE P T TO ~LOW A B~GO EST~LIS ~ THE'CG-(CO '- ZONING DiST~CT, BECAUSE [CITE ~ASON($) ~Y - PLEASE BE SPECWIC] Section 3.01.03 Zoning Distdct Use Regulations S. . . COMMERCIAL,, GENERAL Purpose The purpose of'this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for a wide vadety of commerCial uses intended to serve a population over a large market area, which" do not impose undesirable noise, vibration, odor, dust, or offensive effects on the surrounding area, together with such other uses as may. be.necessary to and compatible with general commercial Surroundings. The number,in "0" following eaCh identified use corresponds .to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined .under the SIO code but may be further defined in Section 2.00i00 of this code. Permitted Uses so g. h. i. i. k. ITl. n. - O. P- q. r. $. t. U. ¥. W. X. Y. 7. bb. dd. gg. AdjustmentJcollection & credit reporting services (732) Advertising Amphitheaters Amusements & recreatiOn services - exceptstadiums,'arenas, race tracks, amusement parks and bingo parlOm Apparel & accessory stores (ss) Automobile dealers (ss) Automotive-rental, repairs & serv. (except body repairs) Cleaning Com ~ (~j~) Communications - except towers Computer programming, 'data processing. & other computer serv. Contract conStrUction serv. (Office & interior storage Cultural activities and nature exhibitions (~j~) :Duplicating, mailing, commercial art/photo. & stenog, serv. (733) Eating places -except public schools ¢2) ac~unting, research, management & related services (91/92/93/94/95/96/97) Farm labor and management se~iCes (07~) -' - - . Financial, insurance, and .real estate (~o/s~2~/r,4/,.~?) :' Food stores Funeral and cremato~ sewices Gasoline se~ice stations General merchandise stores Health sewices Home furniture and. furnishings ¢7) Landscape & ~hodicultural se~ices Laund~, cleaning and ga~ent se~ices Membership organizations - except for religious organizations.as provided in Section 8,02.01 (H) of this Code (~) Miscellaneous retail (see SIC Code Major Group 59): (1) Drug stores (2) Used merchandise stems (s~3) (3) Sperling goods (4) Book & stationa~ Adopted August 1.1990 118 Revised Through.09/07/99 J o hh. II. mm,. nh. 00. PP. qq. rr. ss. tr. W. (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) -Fa (1!6) (1:7) Misc. Miscellaneous (1) (2) Miscellaneous (3) (4) (5) ~Mobile Motion pi Moto Museum Jewelry (5944) Hobby,: toy and games(s945) (5994) Code for specific uses) see SiC COde Major Group 72)' (72se) . Code Major. Group 7 ng.p!aces, ~fruits & vegetables,retail) storage:' 0,52 & vehich ,': (~) (2)- Child Veterina~ services (074) Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with SeCtion 7.04.00. Dimensional'Regulations Dimensional .requirements shall be in a~OrdanCe. -with. SectiOn' 7. :04,00,. . Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Adopted: August !, 1990 119 Revised Through 09107199 . e Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations Off-street parking and :loading .requirements are subject to Section 7,06.00. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section '7.09.00. (.,ond~bonal Uses g, h. i. j. k,, k,, I. Telecom Adult establishments subject to requirements of Sec. 7.10.10. Drinking .places (alcoholic beverages) - free-standing. Disinfecting & pest' control services. (~342 Amusement parks. (~) Go'cart traCks. Hotels & motels. HousehOld goods.warehousing and storage-mini-warehouses Marina -recreational boats only. Motor vehiCle repair services, body repair.. Sporting and. recreational camps, Retail (592) tracks. towem - Subject to-the standards of Section 7.10,23 _ Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject'.to, the requirements of Section. 8'00.00, and include the following: ae · b;. Drinking Places (alcOholic beverages as an accessory use to:a restaurant and/or ciVic, social, and fraternal organizations). ... One ng unit contained within the commercial building, or a detached single-family or.mobile home, (for on-site security purposes). Retail trade: (1) UndiStilled alcoholic beverages (accessory to retail sale of food). Adopted August 1, 1:990 120 Revised Through 09/07/99 ,LLNFIO0 33~]OH:D33~iO ,/ A petition of St. Francis of Assisi'Catholic School Foundation, Inc. for a Condition Use Permit to' AIIow: a BingO Establishment in., the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. J I I I I I I ! Cz i ~ i i · I ! I I I I I i I I I ! I I I I I ! ! I I I I I ! ! 1 t I I ! I I I I i I I i Mediterranean Drive -¢ Boulevard South anna Club Boulevard CU 99.-0,09. This pattern indicates subject parcel Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised November-29, 1999 While every eff(xt has. been made to provide the most current and accurate information possible, il is not intended for use as a legally binding document, N Zoni PUD RD Seheel Fo I i Medi rr an, e.an ! ! I :! I BMH-5 I t I C.U 9 ThiS pattern indicates Subject-parcel Corn W~ i~formation ! t I I rd . ! I t ! So'uth o'ulevard Land S¸t, Use Francis of Assi.si .Catholic Sc.hoo'! Foundation RU I'ND ! I I I I I I I I ~ I I ! I I I I I I ! I ' ! I I ! Mediterranean I I I I I I Boulevard Sou th no Club Boulevard CU 99,-009 This pattern indicates subject parcel Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised NoVember 29, 1999 This map has been compiled for general Planntng and refa'ence-purposes only. While every effod has been made to provide Ihe most current ~ accurate information possible, it is not intended for use as a legally binding document. N. A - PLA & THURSDAE December 15, 1999~: 7:00 P.M. Petition of St, Francis of Assisi Catholic Foun. ¥ n, 'Inc., fora Con~Onal· Use Permit for the following.described property: (Location: 8421. South U.S. High:way.No, 1) Please~ note that all pro. ceedings recorded. If ,a· person decides to appeal any .decision ~de by~:~the~ Local.~~i~ Agen~· . ~, ~ ~ ·. ~ ~ with proceedings :is' ~de,. .which record~includes the ~testimony ,and.er ce UP°h. ~~: the.~appeal is to ~be based. Upon the request of any pa~y to. the proce i indivi~!s, ing. during ~a hearing ~will be .swo,m~in:. "Any party totheprocee -/will be granted an.~, ity to cross- examine any individual t ing during a hearing,.upon request, Written co ents received in advance-of the Public hearing will a!so'be considered, Prior to :this. public hearing, notice Of theo was Sent W all. a~ ~ ,ti p~e~"owners. . ~ December 1, 1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St, Lucie News.and ~e Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie .CoUnty, on'December 3, 1.999' CU.99.009 No. 1337 ST, .LUCIE .. -- ' TO WHOM {1' MAY CONCERN: · - 11,0'0.03' of the 'St, Lucie .CounlY 'Land Planning and request.: ' · 1.' APOSTLE FAITH'CHURCH Change in '. GARDEI 5 2406,506-0077,000t5]. (Location: .. "M"?) ST. ,FRANCIS OF ASSISI INC,, for a · ~;^~C~L ^ THAT PORTION OF LOTS '25,'TOWNSHIP' 36 SOUTH, RANGE 'LUCRE GARDENS AS RECORDED IN .THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF-ST. DESCRIBED ~AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE. POINT. OF · RIGHT OF .WAY UNE OF THE NORTH. LINE "OF ALONG SAID -WESTE BOAD NO. 5 (U.S, 1} wEs'f ~oR ' 5s9.7~ F~RALLEL TO 'TH! ' t~OINT OF LOT 6 FOR 368.77: FEE TO THE TO' THE NORTH. 16 ROAD. UTILITY AND 'DRAINAGE PUR I~,ARCEL B~I THAT 00.~ LESS 1;HE NORTH ~ENW .PARCELS. -~ ' "" ~! ,..~ .' · .... tTAX I.D: ,NO,, 34t4~501 ', 1905~'050/r pLANNiNG' Publish.'. Decembe[ 3, 1999 E2 The News, Friday, ' December 3,, 1999 ST. LUCtE COUNTY PLANNING AND zONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA DECEMBER 15, ! 999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section ! 1'.00.03 of the St. LUcie County Land' Devel- opment Code and the provisions of, tile St. Lucie County Comprehensive Pl<~n, the following applicants have requested that the St~ Lucie County Planning and. Zoning. COmmissio~t consider their foll°Wi~g request: · 1. APOSTLE CHURCH OF- in Zoning rial, Zoning District lo 35 South, Gardens, (OR No. 2406. (Location.. West ~3rd Street, app~'ox ! 50 feet north ~f A~,~nue 2. ST. FRANCIS OF ASSiSICATH- OLIC SCHOOL 'FOUNDATION, INC., to 5;. 6 and ?"of the westerly, llne of Florida Staie and LOt 6;! then said westerly ~ line of Florida State {U.'S, 1) for 465.00 ~ence South 62~'28'20'' West for 350~00 feet; thence North 27°31'40" West for 58.9.71 feet; thence Northt 00°00't9'' East along a line paral, lei to the west line of sald Ld6 for! 79.73 feet to a point of inlersectionl on the north line of said Lo! 6'i ' ' o e is ' thence South 89 42 28 East atongj J the north line of said Lot 6 f°rI 368.77 feet fo the Point of Begin-! ning. Subject to the north 16 feet and the southeasterly 30 feet t~or road, utility and drainage purposes. PARCEL B-I That portion of Lots 5, 6, and 7 of Block 3, Section 26; Township 36 South, Range 40 East, 'Plat No. I of St. Lucie Gardens as recorded in! Plat Book I, at page 35 of the' Public Records of St. LuCie County, J 'Florida, described as ~ollows:J Commence at the paint :of intersec-t lion of the westerly right-Of, way of! State Road No. 5 (U~S. 1) and thei north lineo o~ s.,a, id Lot 6; thence i North 89 42 48' West along the north: line of Lot 6, 358.77 fe~t to fh.e Point of Beginning; tinUe North 89°42'28'' aforesaid line 60.00 South feet; thence 42.87 fe North 7°31 '40" feet; thence North East 70..73 feet 'to the Point of Beginning. Less the north twenty. (20)' feet Of the above described parcels.. (Tax I.D. N6. 3414-501 - 1905,050/4). (Location: 8421-8453 South U.S. Highway No. I (St. Lucie Palm' Center) P. UBLIC HEARINGS will be held in Room 101, SL Lucie County Administration Bui!¢ing, 23:00 Vir- ginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on December 15, 1999, beg!nning at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Anyone with a disability requir- ing accommodation lo attend thls~ meeting should contact the .St. Lucie! County Comm.unitY Se~,vices Man-~ ager at 561/462-1777 or TDD 561/462.1428 at least ~orty.elght (48) hours prior to the meeting. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida 'Statutes, if a person decides lo appeal any deci- sion made by a bo~rd, agency, or commission with. respect fo any malter Considered at a meeting or hearing, he .~ill need a record of the proceedings, and .that, for such purposes, he .may need to ensure that a verbatim record o~ the pro- ceedings is made, which re~:ord includes t!~e .testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal is to be based. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ST. LUCIE' COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/CARSON MCCURDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN Pub.: Dec. 3, 1999 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE VEL OPMENT Planning Division MEMORANDVM TO: FROM.. DATE: SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Members Dawnelle Lewis, Recording Secretary December 15, 1999 MS. DREYER Ms. Dreyer will not be at tonight's meeting. She has a conflicting appointment. Thank you. 4832 South U.S. 1 ~Fort Pierce, florida 34!)82 MERRiTT REALTY INC. Edwin $. Merdtt Licensed Rea~ Estate 8rotmr Office: (561) 464-9728 After Hours; 464-3755 Fax: 464J9733 Deeembe: 7 ~ 1999 Mrs. Frannie Hutchinson, Commissioner ST. LUCZE COUNTY COMMISSION 23~0. ~rgania Ave. Ft, P~erce, Fl. 34982 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE C,.O,UNTy, FL 3: noted that the CO~i~rSiOn On a. fOUr tO one VOte denied the application of 9N~ Partners 2o place a low income 'apar2ment complex on Lenn~.rd Road. When this Item was. brought .before the pla,nn£ng and zoning commission I vo~ed to approve baaed on no obJe croons from public a~ ~he hearing. Not one ~div~dual w=~ a: ~he hearing- from the neig~orhood or any part o~ the County that was in O ppoai=~On tO :he proposed project, i ~ravel Lennard Road on a weekly basis and did not. coflsider traffic a problem. failed to ~ote a day care area on the ~ite plea or probably would' have questioned the idea of a $~nior facility, I have noted in t'he past that people do not at=end the P & z hearings but will show up in force at the Co'un.~y co~m~iaaion. meetings. This leaves me to believe the public pu~s very little weight to how we may vote on a ma=tar. The commission should consider opting to place the f · ~-our fifths major~-ty vote to override the Planning and zoning decisions, Then maybe o~r efforts and time on the BOard would nave. more meaning and effect. - Thanks :for your time and conoideration. Yours truly~ Edwin 8. Merritt Planning and: Zoning ~ember brig.doc -- Offe~inA: -- Citrus Groves, Agricultural · Vacant Land · Income Producing- Commerdal Industrial · Shoppin8 Centers · BUsiness Opportunities . Residential DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Administration TO: FROM: DATE- ME MO RA~ND UM DAu.cLAndemor £U:,,~om~m~ nity Development J~eWcfiul; "C°unty Administrator December 10, 1999 Director SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Update Meeting Schedule Community ~Development "Department staff is preparing the final element for the St. Lucie County -Comprehensive Plan Update. It is our plan to submit the Capital Improvements Element to the Planning and Zoning Cornmission/Local ~Planning Agency for review and approval at a ~special meeting on the fourth Thursday in January 2000, lhe date ,and time for thiS,special meeting will be Janua~ 27,-2000, at 7 p.m. This meeting will conclude the review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan revisions by the Local Planning Agency. - · , . We am pmp0sin~ to,submit tho full Compmhonsi¥o ~lan updata to tho Boa~'d of Coun~ Commission for ro¥iow at four spo¢ia! m,otin~$ to bo heldon tha fourth and'second Thumday$ in Fobruary,. Mamh, and at 7'p.m. Tho datos would bo as follows: · .~ - .. 1) February 24, 2000 2) Mamh 9, 2000 3) March 23, 2000 4) April 13, 2000 5) April 27, 2000 (make-up date) We will schedule specific elements to be rer viewed and discussed at ~each of these meetings. The entire Compmhens~¥e Plan document Will.be 'transmitted to the County Commission no lator-than .February 8, 2000. The Commissioners will have 'a little mom than two weeks to familiarize, themselves with the first, throe. elements for the Februa~ 24t~, meeting questions.Please let meThank~OWyou.if you .know of any scheduling conflicts for the above mentioned dates, or if you-have any Cc: County Attomey Asst. County Administrator Asst. Community Dev. Director Planning Manager S. Lucre County Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting St. LUcie County Administration Building- Room 101 December 155, 1999 7:00 P.M. AGENDA CALL 3[,0 ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll..Call C. Announcements D. Disclosures AGENDA ITEM 1: ELECTION OF OFFICERS, AGE~A:ITEM2: MINUTES. OF THE OCTOBER 21, 1990, MEETING Action Recommended: Exhibit.#1- 21, 1999, Meeting Petiti Faith rChllrCh of Deliverance, Inc., for a change in zoning from the ~RS~ 4 du/acre).ZO ~ning District to the I (institutional)Zoning District. Staff' comments by Hank Flores. · · ~Aefion Reco~ended: Forward Recommendation to the County Commission Exhibit #2: ~StaffReport and Site Location Maps AGE~A 'ITEM .. 4: FILE...'NO ...... CU,99,009; S.T,.~ FRANCIS ..OF ASSIS.I CATIIOI,IC FOU" "'"' .. NDAI'ION. 1NC. Petition of St. Francis of Assisi Catholic .Foundation, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation.ora Bingo Establishment in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning DistriCt. Staff- comments by Hank Flores. Action. Recommended: Forward Recommendation to the County Commission,- Exhibit #2: Staff Report and ~Site Location Maps Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda December 15, 1999 Page 2 AGENDA ITEM 5~ OTHER BUSINESS A. Other business-at Board Members' discretion. Next.regular Board of Adjustment meeting .is scheduled to be held on Thursdav. Ja_nuarg ~,inRoom I01 ~ftheSt. ' ' · · Chambers. Lucre County Administration Building Commission ADJOU~ NOTICE:' All proceedings before the Board of Adjustment of St. Lucie ' electronically recorded. Ifa person decides .to appeal any decision made by the County, Florida, are Board of AdjUStment with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a ~record ~of the proceedings, ~d that, for such p~ose, he may need to 'ins~e that a verbat~ record of the Proceedings is made, Wheh recoid includes the tesffm0n, and er' 'p~ed. UpOn the request of any oa~ to the r~ .: '::.- ~: Y ;__, :)~ ~den.ce upon. which'the .appeal is be sw° " ~ J~-',-,J :,'~ '.. · proceedings, individuals testi '~· · .-. ~ ~. rn :tn. ~y p ~ '-'to the ~r ............. . fying auring a hearin will · : .~ ... ~ ~.. ~ poeeed~ng will be · an ~ - .: ':, g' ~nd~v~dual testifyme drone a.~,e--~---- .... .:~..: gr . ted an oppomtnity to cross examine o. ~ .~ -ming ,upo~ request. hours prior to the meeting. atAnY5.61/462.2822.questions about this agenda ~may be referred to the St. LucieCounty Board of Adjustment 90 ~ OS~S I, 9S BNn81 ~l BHI WO~ 2-09-2000 1 1 : 07AM FROM THE TR I BUNE SG 1 S9$0 ~ OG P. 1 Date: ~m m Re: CC: -'"-" {~ Urgen! t::] ForRevtew ~ Please Comment t~ Please Reply ~ Please Recycle .... . .... . .... ....... , . - _ FEiB--_ _ 17--60_ 04 :59 P'FI PLRNT . HAVEN NURSERY , PLANT HAVEN ~WHOLESALE NURSERY~ IN{:. 10300 W. N~,iclway Road · I:ort Pierce, Florida 3~945 Phone: {561) 466-0801 Fax: (561) 4664449 P.01 : · February 17, 2000 Carson McCurdy, Claaimlan Lo~ Planning Ag~n~-y Planning & Zoning CommiSsion St. Luck County, Florida , R~: Ordi~ce No, 00.011 : '":" '" ' ......... Dear Mr. Me.C .m'. dy, . : , .: : .. I ' ''''~ ; ' ' ' ''":'' ' ' ''" ' ' ' · __,____t has com.e..t0 my attention ~at ordkan~ mending the $.L Lucie cO Land ,,i,;,,,~,. · ~£_:,;'S ,.'~: .:., .em8 ;:-.--.. :.. :.'jM.' a prdesstonal !~~pe e. Otttra. ctor. and a oonoemed ,~ u~=u t woma mce you to oons~er th,'~tlowing reoort~endatiol~; ..... ' "." . i :".?:ii~i:":; .":.: .' ..: ,'. "'.-': !:i'!:..:':: ..': :.. ,... ;' ,.' '!~?..'. tree to" " .. , .... u~j.ealisti¢ cost to.".'.t, he. g.o~r. re~stie the :~oSt-reduces for the, budget ~r a couple of l~er trees.' t0"enhanoe the-"O~rali IOo.'i r" . . p 'ojeot" '. A realistk size for the hedge t ' '"" :": .... "' .... '-:'" ':" corai~ ~d ~"e ~ly ~'t'ord~k ~d will ~¢hkv~ th~ n~,~ ~ff~ when pl~mt, d no mom th~n 2 1/2' The Act is that the.~my being the way it is and wt~ the building boom going on the stock of good qu~ity tr, e, in the: 10- 14' range ta berg rapidly depl,t~. The largest problem with the ~mmerdl landscaping is maintenance. Ifproper maintenance programs are .e~ore~ you will .see a vast improvement over what is taking place now without maldng many changes to the ordimmoe. IfY°u drive around the County and observe what is hapl~~g to t.l~ l~d.~:~tn8 ~.~ kt~~Oon it tdl$ afl. Mo~.t, ~u~tu~lly ~Imo~t all. of th,~ oozed b~'~d~pi~ i~ dofldmt in f~l~r, o'er or undo' w~tm~d, improt~ly pmn~d, ~d Scaerally not mainta~. This direotly e~cts the way the newty installed pl~t material ~ out and oan.mak~ .or br~-it. No mattjr how numy or how large of trees and shrubs are installed, if they are not properly ~ntain~ it is a total. waste oF mon~ and a derwent t~ the entire County. develop a r~th~¢ codeofl~tnd.s~ '., · ' ~P at any'tim,, -, .t/~ _~--L.L ~" apm8 and land,pc mamt~ce Please feel fi*ee ,,~ ~^-.-,~ Bruce Hopper, Ornamental Ho~culturist President PLANNING & ZONING PACKET CONTENTS COLOR CODE CONDITIONAL USES- BLUE REZONiNGS - PINK PLAN AMENDMENTS - GREEN MOBILE HOMES- YELLOW ORDINANCE- WHITE .: Master Agenda (Get order of Agenda from Planner) Copy of PreviouS Month's Minutes Staff Memorandum and Motion to Approve/Deny (per petition) A) Zoning District Use Regulations B) COpy of TranSparency (location map first- per petition) C) Detail:ed Agenda~ (per petition) D) LiSt.of Adjacent Property Owners (per petition) E) Legal Ad Affidavit ~ EACH OF THE FO.LLOWING RECEIVE A PACKET: EACH of:the nine P & Z Members/ · Plannem (Hank and Cyndi)v' Linda Pendarvis Plan~ning~anager (DaVid Kelly).`/ , COmmunity Development Director (Julia Shewchuk) ~, : ~,,,-: .,. , . rphy) C6n~ .onsultants (fax Agenda to Karen @ 465-9904) Deighan Appraisal Don Cooper,-City Manager (City of Port St. Lucie) Mazella Smith (City of.Fort Pierce) ~outhern Real Estate Group Inc. (344-0166) (fax Agenda to Amanda @ 337-9774) Copy ,and mail staff comments to the Petitioner TOTAL OF 32 FULL PACKETS Mail agenda ~ only to: Terry Hess TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL 301 E. Ocean BouleVard, Suite 300 Stuart, FL 34994 Chadie Scholnover SUNTRUST BANK/TREASURE COAST 111 Orange Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 Dave Melnick 120 Estia Lane Port St. Lucie, FL 34983 WYNNE BUILDING CORPORATION- Attn: Marge 8000 South U.S. 1, Suite 402 Port St. Lucie, FL 34952 Debbie Underwood FIRST UNION MORTGAGE CORPORATION 1410 S.W. St. Lucie West Boulevard Port St. Lucie, FL 34986 Rev. 9/99- h:\wp\wp\p&z\pz-docs\packet.pz PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) QUORUM SHEET Meeting Date' Ed Lounds 595-2525 cell Charles Grande 229-9878 home Albert Moore Ed Merritt IIRamon Trias II Noreen Dreyer Stefan Matthes 595-1044 (FP) 398-1550 (PSI) 216-2697 cell 464-9728 work 460-2200 x200 work wor L_Carson McCurdy 971-0060 cell Planning & Zoning Commission Local Planning Agency St. Lucie County, Florida Noreen Dryer 145 NW Central Park Plaza, Suite 200 Port St. Lucie, FL 34986 Charles Grande 9950 S. Ocean Drive #705 Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Edward Lounds 1491 S. Brocksmith Road Fort Pierce, Fl 34945 Stefan Matthes 2980 S. 25 Street Fort Pierce, FL 34981 Carson McCurdy 509 S. Indian River Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34950 Ed Merritt 4822 S. U.S. #1 Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Albert Moore Bruhn & Moore 302 S. 2"~ Street Fort Pierce, FL 34950 q'n acco Ramon Trias 703 Florida Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34950 Bill Hearn 5051 Tozour Road Ft. Pierce, FL 34946 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTI~S, AND POLICIES ~'The following Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies are modifications df the. . portiOns of the Eiement as adopted in I990'. The numbering system'is consistent with the 1990 plan.a~td~ in order ~t.o.facilitate the public hearing process, will.not be modified until this plan is ready fbr sUb~Ssion to the Department~ of Community Affairs . is recommended for addition. ~e,_,,~t..,~, ..... ~ ~,~,a~,-~o ............ ~, ...... ~ .... ,o recommended for deletion, . Material indicated by italt~s has been recommended by a member of the public. These recommendations are included verbatim, Each will be notated with its. source and staff comments. GOAL 11.1: Objective 11.1-1: ~. ·Policy. 11,1.1.I- iNEEDS DELINEATION TO PROVIDE PUBLIC FACILITIES. NECESSARY TO AC~VE A~ ~INTAIN'ADOPTED LEVEL OF~.SERVICE STANDARDS CONCU~NT WITH DEMAND THROUGH FiSCALLY'SOuND CAPITAL iMPROVEMENT PROGRAMMING .AND BUDGETING. Ut~e a process which defines types of '. ' ' ' pubhc facilities, establishes U· . · · standards for level, of service for each type of p bric fac'ffity, and determines what capital improvements are needed in order to achieve and maintain standards (as well as to. repair or replace'existing public facilities). Public facilities means the capital improvements and systems, of each of the following: arterial and collector roads, masS'transit, stormwater management, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, parks and recreation, libraries, jails, courthouse facilities, ad~nistrative facilities, land' structures, the initial furnishings and equipment, design, permitting, and construction costs. "" "~ Other capital costs, such as motor Vehicles and motorized equipment, computers and'office equipment, office furnishings, and small tools are considered in the County's annual budget, but such items are not"pubhc" facilities" for the pu~oses of this Comprehensive Plan, or the issuance of development orders. Draft'- February 2, 2000 I Page I of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Policy ,1.1.1.1.2: · . .:~e County shall establish standards for levels of service for four Categories of public, facilities, as follows: B; , Category A Public Facilities ~ memas arterial and' Collector roads, mass transit, stormwater management, potable water, .sanitary sewer, solid waste, and'parks and recreation facilities owned, or operated by St. Lucie County, all 'ofw~ch are addressed in other.elements of this Comprehensive Plan. · Category: B. Public FacilitieS.~ memas libraries, corrections, courthouse, administration, mosquito control, ~.--~ .-~':~ m .... and St. Lueie County International Airport as owned, oPerated or .developed:by St, Lucie County.. Camgo~ B Public Facilities .are not .used fOr:Concurrency purposes as provided forin the. ' ConcurrencY~' Management Sysmm. , . CategoryCPublic Facilities .~ meaas a~erial and collector roads, mass transit, stormwater management, potable. water, sanitY, sewer, solid waste., ~d parks and recreation facilities owned or operated by Federal, State and mufficipal governments, independent disfficts, .and private organizations., all of which, are addressedin other elements of this Comprehensive Plan. De Category D Public'Facffifies ~ ~g mea~.public health and: public education, facilities owned or operated by Federal,. State, and municipal governments, independent districts, and priVate orgaffizati°ns. Camgory D Public Facilities are not used for concu~ency purposes as provided for in the Concurrency Management System. Policy 11.1.1.3: The. quantity of public facilities necessary to eliminate existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of furore growth shall be determi'ned for eve~ type of public facility by the following calculation: Q =. (S x D) - E. Where: Q is the quantity of public facility needed, S is the standard for level of service, D is the demand, such.as the population, and E is. the inventory of existing facilities. The calculation will be .used for existing demand in order to determine existing deficiencies. The calculation will be used for projected demand Draft- February 2, 2000 2 Page 2 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Policy 11.1.1.4: in order to dete~ne needs of future growth, The estimates of projected demand will account .for demand.that is likely to Occur from previously issued development Orders, as,Well as furore ~owth. Public facilities to se~e, demand from'previ0Usly issued development 'orders shall be inCluded in "D'" (demand) in the preceding calculation. The public facility.formula 'will. be.used for current demand in order tO - determine existing deficiencies. The public facility'formula will.be used' :'for projected demand in.order to.determine needs of. furore growth, The estimates of projeCted demandWill account for demand that is likely to occur from: previously issued development orders as, well as fiamre growth. Policy 11.1.1..5: Policy I 1.1. ~.6.,: Demand that is likely to occur from previously issued development orders Will be addressed, by the County "reserVing" capacity of public faCilities for development orders that were issued by the County.prior to the adoption of.this Comprehensive ,Plan and that are determined ito have vested fights forpurposes, of the concurrency management system.--Th~ A_,.a~,,..,r,,t- 1 , · . . The County :-'*"'-'~"' ~ ,,,,.,.o ,, .,,,~,,,~e persons~ with legitimate, and'substantial vested rights to continue devel.o_pment in good faith in order to reserve capadty of public facilities. The~County will.not reserve capacity of .. public-heilities for previously iSsued development, orders that do not have vested rights for. pu~0ses of concurrency management, and/or which.do not continue development in good faith. There ~e 'three cimumstances in Which the standards for ieve~s of service are not the exclusive determinant of need for a public facility: Calculated needs for public facilities in coastal.high hazard ~eas are subject t° all limitS and conditionS.in the Conservation and Coastal Management and Fumm Land Use Elements of this Plan (see Policy 11.1.5.1), Bt, Replacement of obsolete or worn-out facilities, and repair, · remodeling and renovation, will'be determined by the Bo~d of County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the County Administrator. C~ Public facilities that provide levels of service in excess, of the standards adopted in this Plan may be constructed or acquired at Draft- F.ebmary 2, 2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Page 3 of .28 3 1)' and 2) ar-e-m~ and. any one' ofthe conditions 3).through 6) are met: 1) .....the . facility dOes ~nOt make financially infeasible any public facility of the same type that is needed' to achieve or - . maintain the standards, for levels' of service, adopted.in this Plan, 2) 3) 4) 5) the facility does not contradict,-limit oralter the achievement of the overall goals, objectives and policies of this Plan, the excess capacity is an imegral part of a capital improvement that is needed ~to achieve or. maintain standards for levels of serVice, .. - ..the excess' capacity provides economies Ofscale making, it less expensive than a comparable amount of capacitY if acquired at a later date, · .- : . the. asset acquired is'land that is envirOnmentally sensitive, 0r designated bY the-County as necessary for conservation, recreation or protection of high hazard coastal areas, 6) the excess.capacity is part of a capital project financed by general, obligation bonds approved by referendum or revenue bonds. · Policy 11.1,1,7: POlicy: 11' AnY public facility that is determined to be needed as a reSult of any of ~ factOrs listed in PoliCy 11 1 1 6 shall be included in 'the regular the SChedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Improvements ..Element. All capital improvements projects for such public facilities shall · be approved in the same manner as' the projects that are identified according re.the public facility formula described in Policy I1.1.1:.3. The dete~nation of location of improvements to exPand public facilities will take into'consideration tt~ projeCted growth patterns, as identified.in facility improvements, will be coordinated, with. the capital hcility plans of any other governmental entity providing .pUblic facilities within'St. Lucie County.. Policy 11..1..1..9: All public facility improvements that are based on achieving and · Draft- February 2, 2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 4 Page 4 of 28 Policy 11.l,I. 10: maintaining a standard for levels of service, adOpted' in this Comprehensive Plan..are included in the 'financially feasible schedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Impr°vements Element. The relative priorities among~types of public facilities (i.e., roadS,, drainage, ayiation,.etc.) are.. established by adjusting the standards for levels of semite and the available revenues until the resulting public facilities needs became financi~ly ,feasible. ". ' 'Legal~restrictions on the use of many revenue sOurces limit the extent t° . w~ch tyPes, of facilities may' be prioritizedbecause they do not comPete ' ':,~.for the sine revenues. During each annual, prioritization process, no :,~: fuaher pd°rifization among types of publiC~~ in the Schedule' of -'~ capital Improvements'are financially feasible,.programmed for improvement, and will be completed according to the Schedule. Each year, however, prioritization among typeS :of hcilities-is redetermined by reaffi~ng',or revising stand,ds for-level..of service within, the constraints of available resfficted.revenues. ' : ~ef011owing public facility improvements wi~in a facility type are to be considered in the following order of priority, as determined by the Board of COunty Co~sSioners: ae Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving' and/or maintaining levels of service. Be New facilities that reduce or eliminate, existing deficiencies in leVels of service. New public facilities, and improvements to existing public facilities, that eliminate public hazards 'not. otherwise eliminated by improvements prioritized according to Subsections a or b, above. D~ New or expanded facilities that provide the adopted, levels of service for new development and redevelopment during the next five riscal years, as updated by the annual., review of this Capital Improvements Element. St. 'Lucie County may acquire land or fight-of-way in advance of the need to develop a facility for new development. The location of facilities constructed pursuant.to this Subsection shall conform to the Future Land Use Element, and .specific project locations shall serve projected growth: areas within the alloWable land use categories. Draft- February 2, 2000 5 Page 5 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Policy 11.I.1.11: Policy 11. I. 1.12: Improvements to existing facilities,, nd new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of achieving. and/or maintaining levels of ~service. . NeTM facilitieS that'exceed the adopted'levels of Se~ice.fOr new. grOWth. dUring the'next five riscal years by either: -. 1) providing excess public facility capacity that may be needed by furore growth beyond the..next five fiscal, years, . . _ or 2) providing ~gher-quality public facilities than are ~- · ~ contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. -.G. Facilities not-describedin Subsections A..through E,. above, but Which the County.is obligated to. complete,.pr0vided: that such obligation is evidenced-.by, a written agreement the County '- executed prior to July 31, 1990: · All facilities, sChedUled for construction· or imProvement in · accordance With this.P01icy shall be evaluated, to identify any plans. · of State agencies or. the South Florida Water Management District that affect, or.will be affected by, the proposed capital improvement. Project evaluation may also involve additional criteria that are.' unique to each type of public.facility, as described in other elements, of this Comprehensive Plan.- In the'event that the.planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants : for development orders, the Board of· County Co~ssioners will schedule capital improvements to serve developments in the follOWing order of priority: A~ previously apProved orders permitting new deVelopment, new orders pe~tting redevelopment, and new orders permitting new developments, The standards :for levelS of service for. Category A Public Facilities, County Roads (arterial and collector), shall be as indicated-below on the. basis, of peak hour, peak season traffic volume: Draft- February 2, 2000 6 Page 6 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Ae ., .. Level ~of Service "E" .on the following rOadS or .segments of roads through the end of the fiscal year (~) indicated and' Level ot Service "D" or better ~thereafter: B. .On all other roads for which the COunty has jurisdictional, maintenance or operational resPonsibility, St. Lucie County will adopt the following peak season, peak .hour. levels of service: . · · Replace;. 'with new't~ble by Dennis 1111.1.1111..i.i;111 ~ illiijj.U ! DraR- February 2, 2000 7 Page 7' of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS C. '.::: ~Level of serVice'"C/D peak hour peak season" on all other County · ' arterial and collector roads'. PolicY 1I.!,'1.13::. ., ..- .:!.When anylcounty arterial or' COllector. mad or segment of such a road'is' · ",'determined to be operating one level of service below, its. adopted standard, -. the County shall eXercise one of the following options: Enter into a contract that will result in the addition of capacity, to the facility within six months.., of the determination that 'the facility is operating below its'level.of service-standard, and delay issuance of development orders.until the contract haS been executed; C~ Enter into an enforceable development agreement that spec'ifies :that new development will.provide for the upgraded facility; ~,.~' .Amend theplan to lower the level of se.rvice at the next .... opportunity; or'- .... · PolicY 1111.1.14: D. -:?Not'issue any' develOPment.permits in the.: imPacted area. The , ,:~'purPose of providing for the'temporary OPeration below the .. .:~";~ adopted level, of service is to provide a mas0nable period of time to restore the.level 'of. se~ice.through approPriate improvements to · roads that. are forecast to operate at the adopted level of service, but w~ch may unexpectedly operate at a lower level of service, All development orders issued pursuant to this policy shall be~ conditioned on the att~nment of the adopted level of service. However, this policy shall not impak the. County's fight to refuse to issue a development orde.r pursuant to this policy if the. Board of county. Commi. "ssioners dem~nes that the resultant lower level of service caused' by the proposed development order would constitute a threat to public health or safety.. 'The standards for levels .of service for Categ°ry A Public Facilities, Mass Transit, shall be as follows: No-.mass tranSit service. When mass transit service becomes feasible and prior to its becoming available in the County, the level of service will be set by plan amendment. PoliCy 11.,1,1,1.5: The standards' for levels of service for Category A Public Facilities, County Stormwater Management Systems and other major stormwater conveyance systems, shall be the 10 year/1 day storm event. Draft- February 2, 2000 8 Page 8 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS When the level of service standar, d.:is~iestablished,for drainage subsequent to the completion ~of'~the. County, wide.St0rmwater Master Plan (as indicated, in Policy 6C. 1.1.1), the LOS standard shall include performance standards for.water quality and floodcontrol- Localand state regulations specifying~.stormwater:quality standards shall be~inc0rporated by ~reference as P~ of the ~ainage LOS standard tO.measure performance of systems w~eh are designed to remove Pollutants from.mn-off, Regulations s standards shall be nced to protect and~ of surface~ and groundwater ;bY mn'Off'" fr°m stormwater es. · policy 11.1.1,16: Policy I 1.1.1' I7: 'The standard for level of service for Category A .Public Facilities,,County Water Systems, shall be 88 gallons per capita per day. The level of service standard for those areas of the unincorpOrated Coun~ served.by sanitary .sewer.systems owned by Ft, PierCe Utilities AuthOrity shall bell30 gallons .. per capita .per day,. .. . . . . Policy 11,I' 1.'1.8:. The.standards.for level of service for Categ-o~ A .Public FaCilitieS, County Solid Waste, shall'be as follOws: ,' ." . _ .... · ' . A. 8.77'pounds'.of solid waste per capita coUnty.wide per:day at the landfill. PoliCy I1.1.1.19: g~ Two: years' of permitted landfill disposal.capacity at present fill rates. C~ Eight years of landfill raw land capacity...~~ pr-ese~ fill' rates. The standards for level of'service'for category A Public Facilities, County Parks and Recreation, shall, be as. follows: h,, g~ Regional/metropolitan = 5 acres per 1,000 population COunty-wide. community park land = 5~ acres per 1,000 population'in the -unincorporated area. Ce Neighborhood park' land = .5 acres per 1,000 population in the unincorporated area. Recreation facilities (i.e., buildings and improvements') are included in the cost of park land. Draft- February 2, 2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 9 Page 9 of 28 :~::,,:.; ~";:~ ~;:;C;~`;~`~:~;~3~g5;~¢~:~¢~;i~;~;~;~:~;~`~;;~;~.;~`~?~:~,,.~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ,,, >~ ~,..~,~.~,:, ......../~' ~'-. ..... '..~':,~ ".~:: ...... ..L,.-:, .... ""'-,.,"~'" ,~,~ .......... '' ' ~ ;;'~;::;":3~. :' ...... ?;':-~'~'i~¢'~:"~'~';~':~;:~'?~ ;'-' ': :~' '~,,~a ~ ........ ~ ';':':: >~-- . ~: ~ ;~.:': ;'~(i'~;~':,~..~..;..,:..' '~:'~;:~,,~ :~;:. ,-~. ...... ';~;7',: ::~,-.,. ',' >":~...,. :. ...... :':,;:??txz;2~5l:'i~'.~il~.~::[~:~,~ ;~:~;:.~;;':;:~,~_ ...... Policy 1 !. 1.1.20: PoliCy 11.1,1.21 Policy 11.1.1.22: Policy 117 I, 1.23: PolicY 11..L24. Policy I!.1.1..25: Policy 11. I. 1.26: PolicY I 1. I.!.27: The ~standards. community parks will be pphed m increments of 10 ~acre parks. The standards, for neighborhood parks, wil}~be applied in increments of 5 acres. · , : · · The standards for level of service for Category B Public Facilities, Libraries, shall be as. follows: - .525 square feet of:library per capita; and, 1.45 books per capita. :' The standards for level of service for Category B Public Facilities, Corrections, sh~l be as follows: 0.004.85-beds per capita. .The. st~dard.forlevel of service for Category B .Public Facilities, Courthouse, shall be as follows: .839 square feet per capita ~e Smdard for level of se~ice for C'ategory B Public.Facilities, Administrative and Maintenance, sh~l be as follows: 1.253 square feet per capita ~e. standard, for level of service for Category B Public Facilities, MOsquito Control, shall be as follows: A specific level of service has not been determined, but specific capital improvements have been included within the capital needS listing in order that the listing be comprehensive. A speCific standard for level of service for Category B Public Facilities, Airport, has not been determined. The capital improvement projects included within the capital facilities needs, listing are shown .in order that the listing be comprehensive. All airport related capital improvement needs listed are as identified within the aviation portions of this plan. A specific standard for level of service for Category B Public Facilities, Port'of Ft. Pierce, has not been dete~ned. The capital improvement ts included within the capital facilities needs :listing' ? ~I. and are shown in order that the listing be comprehensive. All port-related capital improvement needs listed are as identified within the port master plan portions of this plan. Draft- February 2, 2000 10 Page 10 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PoliCy 11.1.1.28: "~ '.-"~"~' ~, ~'-"-, .... ~i~County shall require new development to meet .level of service standards for on-site improvements, including loCal streets, water and sewer Connection lines,, stormwater PoliCy 11'. 1.1.29: ... The standards for pe~ season, peak hour level of service for Category C Public Facilities, Federal and State Roads, shall be as follows: A'd' .: · : In coordination with FDOT, the folloWing facilities shall be classified as backlogged facilities and shall increase no more than five (5) percent in pe~'season, peak hour traffic volume thr6ugh the end of the fiscal year (FY) indicated for improvement, and then be m~ntained at level of service "D" peak season, pe~ hour or better thereafter: Bt Level of Service "C" peak season, peak hour for limited access facilities in rural areas. Co Level of Service "D" peak season, peak hour for all other rural and urban Federal and State arterial and collector roads. Draft- February 2, 2000 I1 Page 11 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Note: North US. 1 from Orange to N. AIA widening no longer needed based on 2020, 25* and 7* are alternates. : ~JAAAJJA Ik~A'A~i~AAI~IA v ~,; A AE~4,AA '.g 3.AAA%CAAUAAA~i~IAg, AVA~'I~AIA~'~AJJL4A 'A fk4AAE~J9 L,~AAL~AA I.J~.~ ~iJff AWAAI~; Draft,.- February.2, 2000 12 Page. 12.of .28 · cApITAL IMPROVEMENTS , FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY Objective 11.1.2. Provide needed..publicr facilities that'are within the ability' ' of'the County .to £nnd the facilities from~ C°nnty revenues, development's proportionate share ¢ontribntions and grants or. gilts from other sources. Policy I 1'. 1.2.1' The estimated costs of all needed capital improvements shall not.exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to. the County pursuant to or not precluded by current statutes, and whiCh have not been'rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of revenue. Policy 1 I. 1,2.2: Existing development shall pay for some or all of the capital Draft- February 2, 2000' 13 Page 13°f 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS improvements~ . that~ reduce, or eliminate, existing deficiencies,· some or all of ' the replacement, of.obsolem.or worn. out facilities,· and may pay a portion of the.cost of capital improvements needed by future ~development and 'they. may. take the form of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Policy; 11.1.2.3:~ ..~e' County will allocate the 'costS of new public facilitieS on the basis 'of ~.-:: -' '~ the.benefits received, by e~sting and.~mre residents so that current ::~?.: residents will'not subsidize an urban, sprawl~ pattern of new development. Policy '11.1,2.4:.. ~'..A. Future development ~'::.Future development shall pay for 1.00% of the capital improveme~s - needed to address the impact.of sUCh.development. Furore develOPment's ~proportion' of the cost of Capital improvements'needed to address the impact.of such development shall'be determined, in part, by the County's impact fee ~ ordinances and supporting studies, Which shall include credits for other payment, by furore develoPment,. Impact fees, enterprise fund user chgges~ connection fees, and-other user fees paid. ~by.,new : developmemsh~l be reviewed every two years-, to aSsure 'that provision of capital improvements needed to address the impact of fi~t~re development .wffi not increase ad valorem 'tax rateS,· -Upon C(~mpletion of construction, ~ ~mre. development becomes ',present" development, and shall conffibute to :paying the. costs of the. replacement .of obsolete or worn out facilities aS described in subsection B beloW,. Future development's payments may t~e'the form of, but. are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit.of any public facility, impact -fees, capacity, fees_,, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and ~mre..Payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Future. development shalI .not pay impact'fees for.the portion of any capital improvements, that reduces or eliminates'existing deficiencies, B. ~isfing development -Existing development shall pay for the. facility improvements that reduce ~or eli~nate existing deficiencies, and some or all.of the replacement of obsolete or worn .out facilities. Policy 11[. 1,2.5. - E .:. · . x~sting development s payments may take the form of user fees, special assessments., and taxes. Both existing and future development may have part of their costs.paid by grants, entitlements or provision of public facilities from other levels of Draft- February 2, 2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS :14 Page 14 of 28 Policy 11.1.2;6: govemment'and independent districts' - Capital improvements maY be. financed, and debt shall-be managed-as follows: Ai' Ci Public' facilities financed by county enterprise funds (i,e.,' . automated ~ serviCes, pOtable water,~ sanitary seWer.and sOlid waste) shall'be financed by: .. 1) Debt to be rePaidby user.fees and charges for enterprise services, or 2) Current assets (i.e., reserves, surpluses and current revenue), or .. 3) A combination of debt and current assets. The financing of the capital cost of public facilities with.. .non-enterprise funds (i.e., roads, .sto.rmwater management and parks), shall be from current revenue, equity or debt, or a . combination of current revenue, eqUity and. debt,' whichever may be .mostcost effective and.consismnt with prudent asset and liability management, given the useful life of the assets to be financed and efficient use~of the County's debt. capacity., All develOpment orders issued by the County which require Public facilities that will be financed by debt shall i~e c°nditio; ed oh the assuance of the debt, or the ~,ubstituQon of a comparable amount, of non-debt revenues. Policy 11.!.2,7: The COunty 'sh~l not-Provide a public-facility, nor shall it accept the provision ;f a public aCihty by others, if th~ County is unable to. pay for the subsequent annual ~operating and maintenance costs of the facility. Policy 1.'1.1.2.10: In the event that sources of revenue listed under the heading"Costs and Revenues by Type of Public Facility" of this Element require voter Draft - Febmary 2, 2000 15 Page 15'of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS approval in a lOc~ referendum that has not been held, or a referendUm is . held and is unsuccessful, this Comprehensive Plan will. be amended to include one. or more new revenue sources, Aiternatively;'this'C°mprehensive P1an may be amended to adjust for the lack.~of revenUes, in any of the. following ways: 2~ e e .Reduce the, standard for levels of service for one or more public facilities.. Increase the use of other soumes of revenue. Decrease the cost, and~therefore the quality, of some types of public facilities while retaining the quantitY of the facilities that is inherent in the. standard'for levels of service. ~ .. · A combination, of the above alternatives. Policy 11,1'.2,1 i: Policy 11,1.2,12:' Objecfive.ll.l.3: ' ~. _ Policy 1 I. 1.3.1' All~devel°pment orders issued by the County WhiCh require Category A public facilities,'that will be financed by sources of revenUe-which require voter approValin a local referendum.that is yet'to be held Shall be conditioned.on the'referendum being approved, or'the SubStitution of. other sources of revenue to ensure that facilities are provided concurrent with need. Recognizing-that future funding opportunities may be less ~~ ., . . .. ~ or greater · ~an-originally anticipated and that overall the County will operam within a constrained financial setting,, the first priority for allocation of monies for capital purposes is for the maintenance of the County's. present facilities so as to ensure, proper protection.of the investments in such facilities. PROVISION' OF NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS Within the County's financial capability, provide needed capital improvements for repair or replacement of obsolete or'. worn.out facilities, eli~nating existing deficiencies, and meeting the needs of future 'development and redevelopment caused by.previously issued and new development orders. The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, ~the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements of this Capital Improvements Element. Draft- February 2, 2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 16 Page .16 of 28 Policy 11.1..3.2: ~rSuant to Section 163.3187' Florida Statutes, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as- allowed for~emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain Policy 1 I. 1,3,4: · Pursuant.to Section 1.63,3177, Florida Statutes, the Schedule of CaPital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; acceptance of facilities pursuant, to. dedications-.'Which are consistent with the plan; or the date 'of construction of any facility enumerated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy 11.1.3.5: The County shall.adopt a capital budget as part of the.annual budgeting process that includeS all the capital improvements projects listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements for expenditure, during the appropriate fiscal: year, except that the County may Omit from its annual budget any . capital improvements for which a binding agreement has been executed with' another party to provide the same project in the same 'fiscal year. The County may also include in the capital apprOpriations of its annual budget additional public facility projeCts that conform to Policy 11.1.1.10.E. Policy 1.1.I.3,6: The impacts'of development on public facilities within St. Lucie County are 'found to occur at the'-same time as development authorized by a final development order. The .Board defines final development order as a building pe~t, conditional use approval, Board of Adjustment approval, or any other development order which has an immediate and continuing impact upon the infrastmcture. The County shall determine, prior to the issuance of final development orders, whether or not there is sufficient capacity of Catego~ A and Category C public facilities to meet the .standards for levels of service for existing population and the proposed development concurrent with the proposed development. Policy 11.1.:3,7: A preliminary develoPment order is defined as a DRI Development approval, zoning approval, preliminary plat approval, preliminary development plan approval, Plan amendment approval, preliminary Planned Unit Development approval, or any other development order other ~.~ Draft- February 2, 2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS .? .... - 17 Page 17 of 28 Policy 11.1.3.8: than a final develOpment order~and for which'there are nOt found to be any imPacts of develOpment. The. standards for,levels, of service of Category A and.Category Cpublic facilities shillbe apPlied to: the,iSsuance of develOPment orders on the following geographical basis: . .. · ~ . , ,. ,., .;· , -. : :. ,.. . A. Public' facilities which serve the.entire. CoUnty Shall achieve and maintain the standard,'for levels of service 'on a County.wide basis.: ,.No development Order shall be issued in any, part' of unincorporated St. LuCie Cmanty if-the standard for levels of service is not achievedand maintained throughout the County for the following public facilities: ~B 1) Solid Waste 2) Regional Parks '. . Public: facilities w~ch serve less than the-entire County shall at. eve.and,maintain the standard-for levels of service within their assigned se~ice area as 'defined by the Board of CountY-' . 'Co~Ssi0ners.. N0 development Order Shall be isSued in an · assigned service area or impact area if the 'standards for levels Of service-are :not achieved throughout the assigned service area or impact area for the following public facilities: · · 1) ' Arteri~ and Collector Roads: In order to ~achieve and · maint~dn the level of Service standards as adopted in the ~~~lll~m~~~® ~.~m~,..,~..~ r,; ............ .... ~'*;^" Element,. developments shall address the mitigation of all.Potential project impacts on the: roadway network in their traffic circulation plans. 2) ~SWrmwater Management Systems: Drainage Sub-Basin 3) Potable Water Systems: Treatment Plant Service Area 4) Sanitary Sewer Systems: Treatment Plant Service Area Draft- February 2, 2000 18 Page 18 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 5) District Parks and Recreational Facilities: Planning Area 6) · NeighbOrhood Parks and Recreational Facilities' . _ . (a) Planning Area or applicable area of service for significant impact. · .. (b) Project boundaries, 'for projects providing. neighborhood park(s) sufficient, at a minimum, to meet project demand. COORDINATING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS WITH LA~ DE~LOPMENT Ob' " 1 · ,jecnve 1.1,.4. U ' ' ~0' CoOrdinate.land se decisions and available or pr ,jected fiscal resources with a schedule of capital improvements that maintains adopted level of service: Standards and meets existing and' future facility needs. Policy 11.1,4.1: All Category A public facility capital.improvements shall be Consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the appropriate elements of this Comprehensive Plan. Policy 11.1.4.2: The County shall integrate .its. land use planning and decisions With its plans for public facility capital improvements by using the policies listed in this section of the Capital Improvements Element. The location of, and leVel of service provided bY projects in. the Schedule Of Capital Improvem/ent's.shall maintain, adopted standard~ for levels of serVice'for existing and future, development in a manner and location consistent .with the FUtureLand Use Element of this Comprehensive Plan. Individual land use decisions Shall be.consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the ability of the COUnty to provide and maintain level of service. : .1.4.3. Policy 11 ' The County shall amend its land development regulations to provide for a system of review of various applications for development orders which applications, if granted, would impact the levels, of service of Category A and Category C public facilities. Such system of review shall assure that no final, development order shall be issued w~ch results in a reduction in the-levels of service identified in Policies 11.1.1.12 through !1.1.1.35. The land development regulations shall address the following, at a minimum, in determining whether a development order can be issued. Draft - February 2, 2000 19 Page 19 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Be Review of AppliCations. for Final Development Orders. No final .... · -., .~ ..... ,,,,~ ....... ,~ ..... ,, there, shall be sufficient capacity of Categ0rY A ~d Category C public facilities to meet the' standards for !evels Of' service' for the. eXisting development and for the .. proposed: development according toe. the following deadlines: r . Prior to the. issuance 'of a building permit'for the follOwing publiC'facilities. (a)' Potable water. (b) Sanitary sewer. (c) Solid waste. 2). Prior m the issuance of the building permit, assurance as to the complefion -for . the following public ~faCilifies within the next .twelve months must be. provided: (a) Arterial and collector roads.. (b) · .parks and recreation. (c) StOrm water management. Review of Applications for ~eliminary Development Orders. 'The capacity of Category A and Category C public facilities shall be determi'ned for preliminary development orders according to one of the. following: 1) The applicant may request a determination of such capacity as. pan of the review and approval of the preliminary development order provided that: (a) The determination that such capacity is available shall apply .only to specific uses, densities, and intensities based on information provided by the applicant, and included in the development order, and (b) The determination that such capacity is available shall be valid for development that is completed within a period: (1) not to exceed two years, or Draft:, February 2, 2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS i '20 ~ :' Page 20 of 28 ' Draft,-Febraary 2, 2000 21 (2) any period.of time acceptable to the County and the apPlicant, provided that the period of .time is explicitly set fo,.rth ina binding deVelOPment ..... agreementas authorized by Florida Statutes, and the applicant provides one or more of the following assurances, acceptable to the:CoUnty in form :and amount, to gu~antee theapphcant' 's .pro rata share of the 's financi~, obligation-for public facilifie are constmemd'by the ect property: [b]. Id] Ici performance bond, irrevocable letter of'credit, prepayment ofimPact fees, prepayment of capacity (i.e., prepayment of capacity connection charges), or formatiOn of a Community 'Development District pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes. Whenever ana. pplmant' 's .pro rata share of a public facility is less than the full cost of.the facility, the County shall do one of the. following' - contract with the applicant for the full cost of the facility, including terms regarding reimbursement of the applicant fOr costs in excess of the applicant's pro rata share, or (2) obtain assurances similar to those in subsection (b)[2] from other sources, or (3) amend t~s Comprehensive Plan to modify · the adopted standard for the level of service so as to reduce the required facility to equal the applicant's needs. (d) Pursuant to a and b, above, no further determination of capacity for the subject property as required by .Policy 11.1.3.6 shall~ be required prior to the Page 21 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS expirati°n of the determination of capacity for the preliminary development order, excePt that any change in the density, intensity or land use'that requires additional public.facilities or Capacityis subject to review and. approval.°r denial by the' 'Countyi' ' 'for the. be Considered a reservation of capacity until 'the end of the time "periods specified in 'P0ficY 11.1.4.3.(B)(!)(b) above, or until the .County is notified in ~fing by the applicant that the during~ those volunt~ly yields the pumuant to this Subsection: behalf o~:the 'not applicant Public available order in such or over capacity. 2) 3) Notwithstanding the procedures outlined in Policy 11.1.4,3'.(B)(1), -all approves at. the preli~n~ develOpment order stage.shall include.a condition that the final development order containing a specific plan for :development, including the densities and intensifies of development, will not be issued unless utllic service ~..." ~ . ~ ~,..~ ~ ~ p, ~ sand hcilities exist or are assured to be available to meet or exceed the level of semite standards~ concurrent with the impacts of' development. The applicant may elect to request approval.of a preliminary development.order without a determination of capacity of Category A and Category C public facilities provided that any such order is issued subject to requirements in the applicable land development regulation or to specific conditions' contained in the preliminary development order that: (a) Final development orders for the subject property are subject to a determination of capacity of Category A and Category C public facilities,, as required by Policy 11.1.3.6, and (b) No fights to obtain final deveIopment orders, nor Draft- February 2, 2000 22 Page 22 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS any'other fights to develop the subject property have been. granted or implied by the County's approval of the preliminary development order without determining the capacitY of public facilities. (c) APplicants for develoPment orders may offer to proVide public facilities at the applicant's own expense in order to 'enSure sufficient capacity of Category A and. CategOry C public facilities, as determined, according to Paragraphs a and b, above. Development orders may:be issued subject to the provision of p bhc fac]hties by ~he applicant subject to both of the following requirements,: (2) The County and the applicant enter into an enforceable development ag reement which shall prOvide, at a ~nimurr construction,of the public'fi mechanisms ~ for monitoring public facilities are comPlel with the impacts of the dew development will not be ~1, a schedule for tcilities and to 'insure that the ed concurrent topment, or the ~wed to proceed. -. The public facilities are.contained, in the -Schedule of Capital Improvements of the ComPrehensive Plan. (d) If public facilities are pr~yided at an applicant's own expense, as allowed in sub- paragraph (c) above, the' facility shall not be provided later tl~an the fiscal year f'orwhich that facility was pro~ra~ed in the Schedule of Capital ImproVements. Policy 11.1-4.4: Impact fee ordinances shall require the same standard for the level of service as is required by Policies 11,1.1.12 through 11.1.1.35. Policy 11.1.4.5: , The annual: budget shall include in its capital appropriations all projects in the Schedule of Capital Improvements that'are planned for expenditure during the next fiscal year. Draft- February 2, 2000 23 Page 23 of 2-8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PolicY" 11,1 ;4,7: '~e.. County shall establish and maintain a Concurrency ImPlementation and Monitoring System. The System shall consist of the following components: h. Draft- February 2, 2000 . ' .Annual report on the capacity and levels of service of public facilities compared to the standards for levels of service adopted in Policies 11.1.1.12 through 1'1.1.1.35. This report will function as a public information source to summarize the actual caPacity of public facilities, and forecast the capacity of public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. The'forecast shall ...... ,.,,,. ............. ..... ,.,,,., .... v updated SChedule of Capital. Improvements in th'-'o'r~--;*~' T ..........,,, ~, ...... , · - ' -o ----'v-,.,-,. ......................... ~,. The annual Page 24 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS report shall also summarize and forecast capacities and levels of service for comparison to the standards adopted in P°licies 11.1.:1.12 through 11.1.1..35, but such portion of the ~annUal,report Shall be,for information purposes only and shall not pertain to the. ..... issuance of development orders by the County.. B...' ~blic.FaCility capacity Review. The County shall'use the procedures specified in Policy 11.1;4:3, above, to enforce the requirements of Policies 11.1.3.6 through. 11.1.3.8, and to assure that .public facilities and services needed to support develoPment are available concurrent with the impacts of such developments. A Shall be maintaineddunng" each fiscal yqar to indic of all,development orders year- to-dam on the capacity of public facilities as !set forth in the most recent annual-rePort on. capacity and levels, of.service of public facilities, ~e. land development regUlationS of the County shall provide applications for , that. are: deffied °finsufficient capacity of PUbli, be resubmitted after a time Period to be specified in the ~el >p~ ne~ tt regulations. SUch time period.is in lieu of' and~not~in additic? toi other. g Periods imposed on applications for are denied for developmen~ re within a s 'development time based on . . reserve capacity specified period lack of ' a¢flities. Land commence after, a devel, order is issued, or the hall expire, 'subject to reasonable extensions of included in the re ions. The land also shall the County to final development orders for a C~ D~ Review of.Changes in Planned Capacity of pUblic Facilities. The County shall review each amendment to this Capital Improvement Element, in particular anY changes in Standards for levels of service. and.changes in the Schedule of Capital Improvements, . in order, to enforce the requirements of Policy 1 I. 1.3.5. Concurrency Implementation Strategies. The County shall annually review the concurrency implementation policies that are incorporated in this Capital Improvements Element: Standards for levels of service are phased to specific fiscal years in order to provide clear, unambiguous standards for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS issuance of development orders. (See Policies 11.1.1.12 thrOugh 11.1.1,35.) (2)' .... .Standards for levels of service are applied within appropriate geogr, aphical areas of the County. Standards for ~ 'CountY~wide public facilities are applied to.development orders based on lev. els of.serVice~ throughout the County. standards for public facilities that serve less than the entire County are applied to. development Orders on the basis .of levels of semi.ce:within assigned service areas. (See Policy 11.1.3.8.) . . (3) Standards for levels of service are applied accordin~ to the timing of the impacts of development on public facilities. Final development orders, which impact public facilities in amatter of months, are issued subject to the availability of water, sewer, and solid' waste facilities prior to the. issuance of the building permit, and other public facilities (i.e,, roads, Parks, and drainage) must be available-within twelve months of the.issuance of the building permit. Preliminary. years, As.an alternative, the determination of public facility capacity for preliminary, develOpment .orders can be waived with. an agreement.that~a capacity d6termination must be. made prior to issuance of any final development order for the subject property. Such a waiver sPecifically precludes the acquisition of fights to a final deVelopment order as a result of.the issuance of the preliminary development order. (See Policies 11.1.3.6 and 1'.1.1.3,7.) (4) Levels of service are compared to adopted standards on an annual basis. Annual monitoring is used, rather than case-bY-case monitoring, for the following reasons: a) annual monitoring-corresponds to annual expenditures for capital improvements during the COunty's fiscal year; b) annual monitoring covers: Seasonal variations in levels of service; and c) case,by-case monitoring would require applicants for development orders Or the county to conduct costly, time-consuming research which would Often be partially redundant' of prior research, or involve disparate methodologies and produce inconsistent results. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (5) Public facility caPital improvementS, are priOritized among competing, apPlications for the same amount of facility the current fiscal ye~, the applications to be deferred will -- be selected on the basis ofrati0nal criteria as determined by 'the BOard of County Commissioners, .. . Objective 11.1.5. Policy I 1.1.5.1: COASTAL HIGH HAZARD A~AS The County shall protect the coastline and avoid loss~of life and property in coastal areas by minimizing land 'development and public facilities in coastal high hazard areas. ~blicly funded infrastructure shall not be constructed within' the Coastal High-Hazard Area unless the expenditure is for: A~ Restoration or enhancement of natural resources or public access; Land application of treated effluent disposal (irrigation) on public and private open spaces; Di Flood-proofing water and sanitary sewerage, facilities; The development or improvement of a facility which will serve a crucial need by ameliorating the evacuation time of residents of the County; Draft - February 2, 20'00'- 27 Page 27 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS G' Reconstructi°n.of seaWalls.,thatare essential, to the Protection of existing public facilities or infrastruCtUre; The retrofitting of stormwatermanagementfacilities for water. quality enhanCement.of st0rmwater mnoff;'or. ~ Port facilities. Draft- February 2, 2000 28 Page 2'8 of 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS St. Lucie County.Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting St. Lucie County Administration Building- Room 101 December 15, 1999 7:00 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO O~ER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call C. Announcements D. Disclosures AGENDA~ ITEM. 1: ELECTION'OF. OFFICERS AGENDA ITEM 2:; MINUTES OF THE 'OCTOBER 21, 1999, MEETING Action Recommended: Approval. Exhibit #I' Minutes of the October 21, 1999, Meeting AGENDA ITEM 3i: FILE. NO.. ~:~..~-99,025, · ~APOSTLE FAITH CHURCH OF DELIVERANCE, INC. "' Petition of'Apostle Faith Church of Deliverance, Inc.,. for a change in zoning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single-F ~amily- 4 alu/acre) Zoning Disffict to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. Staff comments by Hank Flores. · · · Action Reconunended: Forward Recommendation to the County Commission Exhibit #2: Staff Report and Site Location Maps AGENDA:iTEM 4: FILE. NO.. CU-99-0.09, ST...:. FRANCIS. OF ASSISI CATHOI~IC FOUNDATION, INC. Petition of St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Foundation, Inc. 'for a Conditional Use Permit to allow. the operation of a Bingo Establishment in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. Staff comments by Hank Flores. Action Recommended: ForwardRecOmmendation to the County Commission. Exhibit//2: staff Report and Site Location Maps Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda December 15, 1999 Page 2 AGENDA ITEM 5: OTHER BUSINESS Ao Other business :at Board Members" discretion. Next regular Boardof Adjustment meeting is scheduled to be held on Thursday,..Ianuaw 20, 2000, in Room 101 of the St. Lucie County Administration Building Commission Chambers. ADJOURN · ' I ' · - ' ' · · NOT CE, All proceedings before the Board. of AdJustment of St. Lucle County, Florida, are electro.tally reCOrded. If a pemon decides to appeal any decision made by ~e Board of Adjustment with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or heating, he will need a record of the proceedings, :and ~that, for Such he may need to 'insure.. that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made:, .eVidence upon w~ch the appeal is based. Upon the ~request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying d~uring a heating Will' be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding Will be granted an oppo~unity to cross examine any individual testifying during a he~ng upon request. Anyone with hours pti:or to the meeting, accommOdation to attend this meeting should, contact the St. at-561/462-1777 or TDD 561/462-1428 at least 48 at uestions about this agenda ,may be referred to the St. Lucie CoUnty Board of Adjustment ,,. PLANNING ~D ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY COUNTY, FLORIDA October 1999 - REGUL~ MEETING MINUTES BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Stefan Matthes, Carson McCurdy, Noreen Dreyer, Charles Grande, Albert Moore, E.d.Meffitt, Ed LOunds, Diana Wesloski BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Ramon Trias (excused) OTHERS P~SENT: jim ~Lancaster, Assistant Co .unty Attorney; Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director; David Kelly, PlUg Manager; Cyndi Shay, Planner II; and JoAnn Riley, Planning 'Technician PLEDGE OF ALLEGI~CE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Wesloski ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. DISCLOSURES: Mr. Matthes disclosed that he .had received correspondence 'from ShirleY BUrlingham, The:other members of the Board .stated that they had also received the .same letter. Jim Lancaster, ASsistant County Attorney, stated that he had reviewed the letter-from Ms. Burlingham and dete~ined that it relates to the Comprehensive Pian, which is a legislative .matter. This item does not have ~to be disclosed because there is' not. an ex-parte problem with legislative 'as opposed to quasi-judicial matters. APPROV~ OF PLANING ~D ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - REGUL~ MEETING OF ~LY '29, 1999 Chairman WeSloski :asked: if~there were any additions or corrections to the minutes. Commissioner Grande requested the following corrections: O' Page 11, ,6th-paragraph, l~t sentence add the word ago between years and SFWMD. Page 11, 7th paragraph, 1st sentence add the word plan after East Coast Water Supply. - Page 11, 3~a buliet from' bottom, Change the word broke to broken. Seeing no further corrections or additions to the minutes of the July 29, 1999 meeting, Chairman Wesloski asked for a motion. Mr. Lounds made a motion for.approx)~tl, and it was seconded by Ms. Dreyer. P lannin g & Zoning Commiss i on/ Local Planning Agency August 19, 1999 Page 1 Upon roll call, the motion was approved 5-0, with Mr. Matthes, Mr..McC~dy ~ Ms. Wesloski abstaining, .~ ~ i ~ ~ APPROVAL OF PL~NING~ AND REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST MINUTES - Chairman WeSloski asked if there were ..any additions or cogectiOns to the minutes. · .... rd · ho Commms~oner Grande requested that the 3..p ap ~ ~n Page t3, not Mr. Blaze. Seeing no fi~her co~ecfions' or :additions m .the minutes ofthe Au~st 1~2, Wesloski asked for: a motion.~ ~, Meffi~ made a motion Matthes. Chairman Mr. Upon roll call, the motion :was.-approved 6-0, with Mr. Moore and Mr. McCur~'~staining. APPRO'V~ OF pLaNING .~D ZONING ~MiNUTES REGUL~~ MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 16, 1'999 Chaiman Wesloski asked.if there were ~y .additions or.corrections to the m s, 'Co~issioner Grade requested ,the cost of the roadway improvement be for eo~ecfion. Staffwill review ~the official record ~and record the ¢ogect cos[.. Seeing :,no f~her eogecfions?or ~ions. m the minutes .of. the Chai~an Wesloski asked: for a ~mofion. Mr. LOunds seco nded by Mr..Mo ore, ~ ~. Upon roll call, the motion was approved 8~0. and it was Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local ~Planning Agency August 19, 1999 Page 2 PUBLIC HEA~NG JERRY HIi~L AND MARGO: STEVENS FILE NO. CU-99-023 Chairman Wesloski explained the Planning and Zoning Commission heating procedures. Ms. 'Snag: presented staff co~ents. Ms. Snay stated agenda Item 4 is the petition of Jerry Hill and Margo Stevens, for a change in zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 :du/acre) Zoning-District to.the RE-2 (Residential, Estate - 2 du/acre) Zoning~District for propertylocated on the east side of Christensen Road, approximately .80' miles north ~ofWest 'Midway Road, The subject property abuts AR- 1 zoning to the north, south and west .and P~ (Palm'Gardens Subdivision 1.9 du/acre) to the east. The petitioners are requesting this change in zoning in order to develop the subject prOPerty as a the existing~ RS (Residemial SubUrban) land use classification. A number of ye~s ago, the adjacent, property was developed with a single-family residemial unit. Upon completion of the residemial unit and development of an "as-built" Survey, an encroachment of the residential unit on the adjacent property was identified. During negotiations between the .propertY owners, a lOt line adjustment Was. filed with the'Clerk of the COurts (without gOing through the County lOw split procedure) which solved the immediate prOblems with the lot line encroactunent. Since that time, both lots have been ~so!d to new owners. When the new property owners:of the.subject lot filed fOr a building ~permit to construct a residential unit: on the lot, they were informed that the lot did. not meet the ~nimum code requirements for the AR-1 (Agricultural Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District, specifically the minimum 150-foot lot width. Because the problem was created .by the previous lot owner, it does not meet :the standards for granting a v~i~ce. The .applicant has stated that adjacent property owners .have been ~Unwilling to sell .additional width to this parcel. Staff has reviewed this petition and .determined that it~conforms with the.standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Ms. Snay. Mr. Grande asked staff if they had contacted the adjacent property owners. Planning & Zoning CommisSion/ Local Planning Agency August 19, 1999 Page 3 Ms. ~Snay stated that staff..had, not applicant to contact the adjacent property -Chairman Wesloski askedif the applicant was present and-would like to .ad&ess the Board. Mr. 411 Nort. h U.~S..1, Fort Pierce addressed the Board. He agent for the :He stated that the proPerty: frontage on Christensen Road. constructed,on -~.-M~hY~ stated that neither looked at 'the frontage, short of the minimum cOde requirement, isthe u!d be reason, owners were~n0t in ~aposition to-~setl offered to pay for Ch:ai'rman'Wesloski,asked the Board'if there 'were. .questions forthe app! ,'~ of¸ owner or'not. At this time, Chaiman Weslosh.opened the public portion'of the heating, Chaimm"Weslos~~ -if . was anyone that woUld to spe~. in or of orin :opPosition to this petition. Ms. WeSloski is not.-oppoSed to the .rezoning ~of the sUbj'ect prope~y. Hearing no further arguments in favor of or in opposition to the petffiOn, closed the public portion of the~hearing. ..she Wesloski Chairman Wesloski asked what would.be the pleasure~ of the Board, Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local ~Planning Agency August 19, 1999 Page 4 Mr. MenStt stated he would like to see. a.change in the Land Development' Code,: Which allows, for .costly fee. After conSidering the'teStimony presented dt~ng the public hearing, including -staff comments, and the standards of review ~.set. forth inSecfion 11.06.'03, St. Lucie .County Land-Development Code, Mr. Merritt moved thatthe Pl~ng and Zoning Commission recommend that :the St' Lucie County Bo.ard of.Co~.unty Co~issioners ~ant. approval .to the application of jerry Hill and Margo Mr. McCurdy second:ed the motion, and upon roll call the motion was approved 8-0. Chaiman Wesloski stated that the petition would be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a reco~endation of approval. Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning .Agency August 19, 1999 Page ~5 PUBLIC HE~NG Ms. Cyndi :Snay presented staff comments. Ms. Snay stated'Agenda Rem5 is' the appfication.of BNG Parmers, · property located onthe West Side'Of Lennard from' ~the ·RS,3 (Residemial, S~gle~family- - 3:du/acre). Zoning~District.m Medium-. 9 ~du/acre)~Zoning~ ~District, The-subject~property· abuts. ~'9 .the south, .:Port St~' ~-Lucie '.~-1l .(Multiple Family Residemial Commercial) and I (Institutional)to the east ~and OSR (Open (Single-Family 2 du/acre) to the west. The petitioners, BNG Partners, Inc, sting this zoning tO develop the Multiple-Family - 9 .du/acre)zoning district iS compatible Medium) land use classification. The proposed RM-9 (Residential, Multip!e.mily ~ 9 alu/acre).~Zo~ Dis~i~,!~ ~~atible with the existing ~zoningdesignations .and development patterns within.the-surrou ~ :area. ~Staff ~has discussed.this petition wRh the ~Pla~ng Staff at the City of Port Staff stated that ~the o-~y issue was the available trips at the t~e of site plan'approval. The City Staff has ~reviewed this ~petition and .determined .that k conforms set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code .and is not .objectives, and policies of.the .St. Lucie :County Comprehensive PI~. forw~d this with the goals, you Chairman WesloSki asked if there were any questions for ~Ms. "'~nay.~ · Ms. 'Dreyer ~asked staff:about, the location of the .existing sing!e-family residential.-~it~ ~ to. the south. Ms. Snay stated she did not measure the distance. Mr. Matthes asked staff if the improvement of Lennard Road is on the C!P at this point. Mr. Kelly stated he will have to check on the item. Chairman Wesloski asked 'if the applicant was present ~and would like to address the Board. Planning & Zoning Commission/ ,Local Planning Agency August 19,, 1999 Page 6 Mr. Haro'ld Melville, repmsentative'for applicant, ad&essed the Board. Mr. Melville stated he has an aerial 'which depicts the'house. Mr. Melville pointed out that the location ofthe house is to the south of the subject property. Mr. Melwille fi~ ~her Stated that .on the-west side there is a lot of natural buffeting. The property to the north is ~~9 ~at the cu~ent time. Mr. Melville further stated that the zoning designation would be consistent with .an orderly and logical pattern of gro~h within the area. Mr..Melville stated .that. they are 'requesting that the application be furthered to the County Commissioners:with a recommendation of approval. " Mr. Moore requested the .opportunity to review the aerial. Chairman. Wesloski asked if there were any.questions for Mr. Melville. Chairman. Wesloski asked Mr. :Melville if the project was going to be low-income housing. Mr. Melville stated'that the project will be a senior community deed restricted for senior's only. It will be fimded throu~ a program where there are tax cr6dits for the develop~r. The tax credits will allow the developer to .charge.a lower price on the units. Chairman Wesloski requested that Mr. Melville clarify that the units are for those individuals 55 years or older. Mr. Melville ¢onfi~ed this and stated that' it will be deed restricted as an adult community. Mr. McCurdy asked if the applicant was .pi'arming on site built homes or modular units. Mr. Melville .stated t/hat the project~wil! be ap~ent units. Ms. Dreyer requested that Mr. Melville identify the yellow lines on the aerial. Mr. Melviille stated that the parcel in question is a-portion of a larger parcel of land, that is approximately 100.acres in size. ~. Melville pointed out that the yellow lines represent the 30-acre subject parcel. Mr. Menftt asked Mr, Melville to clarify if the parcel was an old citrus grove. Mr: Melville confirmed that the subject parcel is an old citrus grove. At this time, Chairman Wesloski opened the public portion of the hearing. Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 19, 1999 Page 7 Chairm~ WesloSki askedif there~was anyone that woUld tike to 'spe~ in: r:.of~r in oppoSition to this petition, Hearing no further arguments in favor, of or in opposition to the' closed the public portiOn :of:the :hearing. 'Chairman Wesloski asked what 'would be the pleasUre-Ofthe Bo.ard ~ WesloSki After considering the standards ~ofreview as set forth in Section 11,06.03, St, Lucie Mr ,. ~Moore :moved .that the Pl,~ng Board of County Co~isSioners grant a change, in zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, - 3 du/acre) RM-9 (Residential Multiple,Family- 9 d~acre) Distfict; ~r Mr. Matthes seconded the motion, and upon~roll call the motion was approved 8~0. . ~ Chairman Wesloski .stated .that .the petition~ d be fo d~ ~to the :B of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 19, t999 Page g I PUBLIC-HE~NG DFR, LLC FILE. NO. 'CU-99-00.8 Mr. David Kelly presented staff comments. Mr. KellY Stated that this is he appheat~on ofDFR, LLC for a conditional use to allow farm.products warehousing and storage inthe AG-1 zoning district. At the time, the packets were:distributed last week, staff'had reco~ended a denial of the petition. Subsequent to that dis~bution, Staff met with Mr. Tierney, 'DFR, LLC representative, and Worked to clarify the particular uses'being proposed. Subsequently, staff has changed their position .and is now recommending .approval. Mr. Kelly further stated that each'Board Member would find'an ~amended staff report on the dias. The location of the.subject property is at 8455 Orange Avenue. staff has reviewed the application ~and .determined that the.proposed use of staging refrigerated containers with-citrus ~it in them, complies with "farm products storage". Staff is now recommending .approval. Chairman WesloSki asked if there were any questiOns for Mr. Kelly. ~. Moore. asked if the use is a substitution for' staging of tractor trailers for storage and now they are saying they :are refrigerated ~units. Mr. Kelly stated it was staff's ~derstanding early on fi-om the descriptions, that it was a more general tracking operatiOn which would be better located in the IL Zoning District. " The applicant.has clarified that it will be citrus fruit and refrigerated containers and that use clearly falls under the definition of Storage-of agricultural products. ~. MOore asked ifstaffwas concerned that a lot of tractor ~trailers would be coming in'and.out of the ~property instead of the property being utilized just as StOrage. Mr.. Kelly stated that ~ either case you will have a lot of tractor trailers. That is the nature of the business to move-the'trailers. ~e concern was to verify that it was an agricultural operation and not a more general tracking operation, Mr. Matthes asked if the' utility next to the subject property was the gas company located on Orange Avenue. Mr. Kelly verified that Mr. Matthes was correct. Chairman Wesioski asked if the applicant was pres'em and would like to address the Board. Planning& Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 19, 199.9 Page 9 ~. Steve Tierney, Fort Pierce, DFR, Highway. Mr. Tiemey stated that the appficant was requesting the conditional to allow a to market citrus fruit~overseas. The subject.property ~s from 1-95.. A .grove owner would be 'able t° call"and 'say I want.a COntainer. of fmitto go There are: a.couple' of the same type ~of operations in Indian.~ver coUnty, will be better, because very .excited ~ab0ut the operation and R appears that the ~ngs · stop akeady ge-berates a significant, mount of traffic, desi~ations, we :feel 'that t~s :area :should probably 'Thetruck the zoning Mr. Tierney 'hrther stated that it m~es sense area be an agricul.tural .enterprise ~d specifically this Avenue and a g~ mi!ityeomp~y next door pr0perty.. There is a feed. store next. d°orand~ across. transpo~ation problem, due ,m it will be.a minute potion in eomp~son m the track stop. the. tracks g0.nowhere but t~95.and down ~ng s H.~ghway.t. ~the T ike, Mr. Tierney stated that the location is an'ideal place for a groVe sea:ce'that recommendation :and.'fo~'~d use for the staff a Mr. Tierney introduced Mr. Fred. Watson· .and Mr, BUd· . We!ch,. stated that they will be available to answer :any questions that the He Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any.questions for Mr. ~Tiemey, Ms. Dreyer containers would be or is it alsoa trucking 'a location ~the reffigerated Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 1'9, 1999 Page I0 Mr. Tierney ,stated it is a :trucking'business only for agricultural products. The idea is that it .is a place where 'a grove, ownersays "I'm .packing, I want this track to go to Japan, they call up the business and get a container-fight then to pick up. the' ~it and get sealed at the grove :or packing house, then either bring it back m the subject property to wait for another driver to take it away or it' directly to the: port. By having the containers ~readily available, they can immediately meet the needs of the grove owners." Mr. Lom.~ds asked Mr. Tierney how long he had lived in St. Lucie County. Mr. Tierney stated he-~has resided in the.County since 1957. Mr. Lounds then requested that Mr. Tierney share with 'the Board the name of the companies that the containers belong :to. Mr. Watson, Priority Transportation respOnded by stating that Priority Transportation is a trucking company.. The containers, that.Will ~be loaded with the citrus, belong to several different steamship lines, Hodges, OOCL and ~, for example. There are different ones,-that go out of:different ports. Jacksonville, Florida, Charleston, SoUth Carolina, and also Savanna, Georgia. We have terminals fight now in ~Savanna and JackSOnville, In ~the very near future, an additional terminal will be opened in Charleston.. - ' Mr'. Lounds stated that he und~st~ds what-the company is proposing to do. Mr. Lounds fi~her stated that the containers do not go to ~e: groves, they go to the packing houses, not to the growers. They leave that packing house loaded. Mr. WatSon stated that most of the packing houses are in the groves. Mr. Lounds stated that most of the packing houses in St. Lucie County and Indian River County are located up and dom US Highway One. ~. Lounds asked ~, on if they are currently doing business-~ the proposed location. Mr. Wason responded tha they are currently, not operating out of'this location. Mr. Watson further explained that they had just recently-p~chased the property. Mr. Lounds asked if Maersk was the companies biggest competitor. Mr. Watson stated that Maersk is a steamship line that handles their shipping out of Miami. Mr. Lounds stated that Maersk had just, opened a terminal out of Fort Pierce. Mr. Watson stated that he was not aware of that. He further stated that Maersk tracking company is contracted by the steamship line, which is Maersk, to haul their containers. He further stated tha_t he noticed a lot of Maersk containers along Orange Avenue adjacent to the roadway. Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 19, 1999 Page 11 Mr. Lounds asked if that the Proposed~ business Would be .utilizing Mr~ 'Watson .said the containers and Vehicles ~would be the~sme. Mr.. Lounds asked: whether or not Gibney previously used the' of.trailers. Mr. Watson stated that was correct. Mr, Lounds stated he had several problems with what 'the applicant is asking~to~ 'they ~e going to do it: but, with it being He stated he hopes it tums out to.be better than what Maersk with 'how service. Mr. Watson stated that .they have bought thek property, The-business-is community. The company ~rther wants thek.operation stated that they do. not want their ~operation tO.be ~om He fia'ther Mr. Lounds'stated~that their competRion has that reputation.. Mr...Lounds asked whm the. company does m the off. season w~th: the:faCfi ty. Mr. Watson'stated'the .drivers will be ~ing out of the Savanna Office on a y~m~d basis. Mr, Lounds asked Mr,. Watson if the company did: inthe.vegetablem -. ' Mr. Watson stated theY.only work in,the citrus market. · Mr. LoUnds asked if when a :comainer is hauled back to the subject property, ~! it be ~I1 of citrus, or' is it your intention not to haul it~ the~.containerS :straightto' i"95., ..' :. Mr. Watson said ~some containers will be.~ll..some, won. ~en a driver Savanna, .-their,t ha!up ~here Witl pu!!om ;~ ty, If they .come.in hte; off the ~11 container and pick UP an empty container and'bring it'baek here, gets an order before he arrives, the ~ver will gO straight-to ~t loaded. If they ~don pick up a fiall container. Mr. Lounds 'asked how many reefer units are going to be mnning~ on. the prop. ~. ~ ,,.-~ ~.. atone time. Mr. Watson stated that What they call us and tell the number of reefer units necess~, if they call · during the .day, a driver:will, automatically :be dispatched, m. the packinghouse,' . Mr. Lounds asked'if there were .going.to be reefer units .ru~ing~on the prop .... , getting chilled,~ ~ 24 hours 'a day. . Planning& Zoning Commission/ LoCal Planning Agency August 19, 1999 Page 12, Mr. WatSon stated, the reefers can:be chilled in less than ~an hour. Mr. Lounds stated-that disturbing area. noise of the reefers running all night long, Mr. Lounds stated ihe is also concerned about the ingress and egress on Orange Avenue. It is constructed like King's Highway there are no proper turning lanes. It is a narrow road. Mr. Lounds asked Staff if they had any concerns with the traffic at this time, Mr. Kelly statedthat it clearly is a .concern, but a minor concern when looking at the developrnent of Orange Avenue. There are a lot of different type of uses in the area at this time. We ~dn t make an issue of it.at this time. d , ~ Mr. Lounds stated that he'is not -upset with what they are trying to .do. The business is one that is needed in this ,county. He further stated he would like.to see it here~in St. Lucie County rather than the company go to hdian-River County. Part of his problem is that it has been presented as growers, and gr .wers don"t pack, the packinghouse packs the fruit, when those ~ts leave there, they are hooked m the times '~d on-their way to a specific,port. Mr. Lounds further stated.he had concerns over the noise. Mr. Kelly stated :that as this is a conditional use, conditions may be placed on the :petition. Mr. Lounds stated that he wouldn't.want to restrict the operation as to the company not being able to chill a container at .3:00 a,m. 'when it is needed at the packdnghouse at 6:00 a.m. It is needed there for a reason. The container is going to leave out of there with produce that keeps people in business, in .St. Lucie Co~ty, I think you should provide some consideration in landscaping the site in order to dampen the noise. I thi~ the ingress and egress should be conducive to the ~narrow roads. Lighting in the area should be looked ~at in .order to not b.e detrimental to the exiSt~g residential neighborhood, Mr. Lounds further .asked that the company not go. to someplace else, St. Lucie County needs the business. The cOmainer business is very viable and is needed in the ~o COunty area (St. Lucie and Indian River co,ties). Mr. Lounds hgher stated that the company needs to share oPenly with staff wha they are going to do, It is not going to a grove, to be packed, it is going to packinghouse. Ms. Dreyer asked staff if it was the Eckerd site previously had been noted to have the potential for having a tracking company.on it. Mr. Kelly confirrned that Ms. Dreyer was .correct. Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 19, 1999 Page 1.3 told -the nei Ms. Dreyer stated that 'she'was still not clear Whether ~or a Mr. 'Kelly stated although the storage woUld be for a Short time, the Prim~ useis to istore citms in a refrigerated, container until it can~moved. - ~ . Mr. Watson stated that the tractors will'not beparked there, they will be on ther0ad. Ms. DreYer-asked if it wOuld only be the containers that are stored there. Mr. Watson, confi~ed.that 'she'was co~ect.- Ms, ~Dreyer stated she~ also felt,the .business. was ve~ would, like to ~see ,some neighbors across Orange Avenue,,and some from impacting the residences. · Mr, Watson stated that currently thek fence is setback approximately 35 -' Ms. Dreyer asked'what Was plied for the.back potion of the ~property. Mr. Watson.stated that-at this time, they.hawe ~onlY property. : Mr. Grande asked whether'or not this was a storage and staging area for Cont~~' It 'sounds like they.will ve~ ,rarely actually have citrus storedon the property, Mr. Watson stated that the. containers would have citrus in them a lot would not. s~ Mr. Grande ~asked if had,any feel site. Mr. Watson stated that did not'~ow at this time. '~' ~ Mr. Me~tt asked if the company-would consider putting a landscaping screen ~°gs the ~ont, with trees that couldabsorb sound.. '~ - Mr. Watson stated they would certainly be willing to do this. Mr. Merdtt also asked if the company would be shipping ,concentrate Or freshjuice- Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 19,1999 Page 14 Mr. Watson stated that they are not shipping it from St. Lucie County. They .dO ship it directly out of their .Savanna Office. Mr. Lounds aSked if you pick ready to go to Savanna. is it a container of grapefruit of 4/5 cartons and it is chilled and to sit on 'the lot very long? Mr. Watson stated it would not sit on the lot very long. Mr. Lounds further asked for clarification on whether Or not storage would be on the lot for very long. Mr. Watson stated that there may be a container 'there anywhere from 12 to 48 hours. Mr. LOundS asked ~staff if storage of agricultural and farm products is defined as 24~to 48 hours. Mr. Kelly stated you and the BOard had hit on staff's confusion very early on. staff came t° the that is a.bonafide,agfieultural Se~ice that ~pmbably ought to be allowed in the agricultural area as ~a conditional use. Mr. Lounds asked if there is.another classification with which this item would fit. Mr. Kelly stated that Staff did not find-one. Unless we simply say it is a trucking operation, and it belongs in IL. ~ich is really no't where we want it to go. Mr. Lounds asked staffif Orange Avenue between 1-95 and Jenkins Road was a County or City roadway. Mr. Kelly stated it waS a county roadway. Ms. Dreyer stated she did not enough about the operation to set out conditions. She ft~her stated ~that'she. felt there are some limitations that might be-needed on the project. She stated that she did feel that it was clearly an operation of storage and warehousing of agricultural products only. Mr. Kelly' stated that the Board could direct staff to work with the applicant to bring a reasonable solution to the County Commission on the issues raised during the public heating: noise, surface, landscape, ingress and. egress onto Orange Avenue, lighting, narrowness of Orange Avenue. Mr,. Lounds stated that the surface on the property will need to be a very stabilized surface or the movement of tracks within the property would deteriorate. Mr. Watson stated that they have plans to stabilize the property. Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 19, 1999 Page 15 At this time, Chairman Wesloski opened the public portion of the hearing. Chairman wesloski asked`if there was, anyOne that WoUld like t° SPeak.~ in favor. .~.°f or, in opposition to this petition. Hearing no further arguments in faVor of or in oppositi°n t° ,the Petition, C~rman Wesloski e!osed the public portiOn of:the hearing. Chairman Wesloski asked what would be the pleasure of the Board After considering the testimony presented ~ during the pUblic, heating, ' set foah Code, Mr. Lucie Chairman Wesloski stated that.the petition would be forwarded m the Board of Commissioners with a recommendation or.approval, Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 19' 1999 Page 16 OTHER BUSINESS: Chairm-~m Wesloski asked if:there was any other business. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Kelly if there is something that could be done to allow minor lot line adjustments to be done at the Staff level when no there are no objections made by the neighbors. Mr. Kelly stated he wished there was some way. Mr. Merritt asked if there-was anyone who could change the code. Mr. Kelly stated that there may~be.someway to.give discretion to someone in the county to have the privilege if it is on a percentage level. Mr. Grande.stated that he'would like to see staff's discretion expanded in terms ofdirect commUnication: withthe neighbors. ~at was: done this evening, appears to solve the immediate problem, but'! fees that a staff:member, not a realtor, should Contact the neighbors ~and explain to them clearly, not from the buyers perspective, but from the county's perspective, what is involved. · The neighbors still may decided not to give it. He stated he is not sure that the neighbors understood that. the neighborhood had a plan, and because of their reluctance to give up title to one-s.quare foot of Prope~y, what they now have is a separate zoning on this piece of property. ~ich breaks the overall plan of the neighborhood. He further stated that if someone from staff, who understood that concept spoke with the neighbors, more than likely one .of the ~o would have given up.the property. Mr. Kelly.staed that Mr] Lancaster recommended that staff not contact the neighbors.- He further stated that he. did have occasion to talk-to one of the neighbors on an issue. That neighbor gave a reason, wlhich w~ a valid reason for not doing so, and asked that the' reason not be disclosed. Mr. Lancaster stated that' it isn't the role of the Planning Department to take sides on an issue. Once we start speaking with neighbom on behalf of an adjacent neighbor, the County' s neUtral perspective in forcing the law has been diminished. Mr. Kelly asked that the B°~d join him in thanking JoAnn for her efforts on this Board. T0night. was going to be ~her last night as secretary for-the Board-as she has accepted a new position in the County. Mr. McCurdy asked if staff could incorporate aerials into the packets from this time forward. Mr. Kelly stated he will look into this. Planning,& Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 19, 1999 Page 17 Mr. Kelly stated-~there was. one more item and that is starting next month :things;~ ~ goingto be ~ handled in a slightly different order. Staff.will make .a very brief presentation. and defend their project. Then ,staff will come back before the recommendations. There being no further ~business, the meeting adjourned-at 8:16 .p.m, Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency August 19, !999 Page 18 PLANNING ~ ZONING COMMISSION ~VIEW: 12/15/99 File Number RZ-99,025 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPME~ TO- FROM: DATE: Planning and Zoning C~o~ission Planning Manager (~'/~'] December 8, 1999 SUBJECT: District to the I (InStitutional) zoning District. LOCATION: EXI~STING.ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: West~side of North 43ra'Street, approximately 150 feet north of Avenue "M". RS-4 (Residential, Single-.Family -4 du/acre) I (Institutional) FUTURE LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: RU (Residential Urban) 0.25 acre PROPOSED USE: PERMITTED ~USES: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USES:. Expansion of an Existing Church Facility Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(X) I (Institutional) - contains the designated uses Which are permitted by fight, permitted as an accesso~ use, or permitted through the conditional use process. Any use designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approvals. Any use .not .found within the zoning district regulations are designated. as prohibited uses for that district RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family- 4 du/acre) is located to the east, south, and west. I (InstitutiOnal) is located to the north. The general existing use surrounding the subject property is .residemial. Apostle Faith Church of Deliverance, Inc, is established on the property to the north of the subject prope~y. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) , i : i ' ' : · ,, December 8, 1999 Page 3 Petition: Apostle Faith Church of Deliverance, Inc.' File No.: CU-99-009 e 0 6~ Whether there, have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have nOt changed so as to require an amendment. extent to Whi, The intended use for this applicant will are in' . . amendment would result in W " to h~chthe proposed ineluding but not emergency , to create significant additional to the approval of any proposed to provide docUm~mation verlfyin~ that Whether and the extent to which the proposed amend, ment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natul-al ~nvironment; ® ~ether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such Patterns; ' ge' USES. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with'the purpose 'and intent of this Code; Code. ' COMMENTS The. petitioner, Apostle Faith Church of Deliverance, Inc., has requested this change in Suggested motion.to recommend approval/denial of this requested change in .zoning. MOTION TO APPROVEx A~ER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLU]DING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.'03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOA~ OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE APPLICATION OF ~OSTLE FAITH C~CH OF DELIVERANCE, INC., FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RS-4 (RESIDENTIAL:, SINGLE-FAMILY- 4 DU/ACRE) ZONING DIST~CT TO THE I (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE ..... ... [CITE REASON WHY- PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. AFTER . ,ONSIDE~NG THE T~TIMO~-PRESENTED 'DURING THE P~LIC HEARING, ~CLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST, LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT ~CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND" THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION FO APOSTLE F~TH C~CH OF DELI~~CE, INC., FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE'RS-4 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 4 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE I (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE ..... [CITE REASON W'HY- PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. Regulations With-section 7.04.00. ~ents requirementS ~re sUbject to 'SeCtion 7;09:00- (9~) (999) Theaters. (099) se~ices, ~26) (9t,92,93,94,95,9~,97) · 1990 132 ReVised Through 09/07/99 Section 3.01.03 Zoning DistriCt Use Regulations . ko. Medical and ~other.health services. (so) Postal service. (43) Residential care faCilities for serious, or habitual juvenile offenders. (~) Tele~mmunication towers - sUbject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section ~8.00.00, and include the following: a., Ddnking Places (alcoholic beverages related to civic, social, and fratemal uses). Restaurants. (InCluding the sale of alcoholic beverages for on.prOmises cOnsumption only.) Residence hall ds:. dWelling unit or mobile home, for on-site securi~ purposes. Adopted August 1,199'0 133 Revised Through 09/07/99 ~iN~O0 33~O,HO33NO A. Petition-of Apostle Faith Church of Deliverance, Inc. for a Change i'n Zoning from RS-4 (ResidentialiSingle FamilY-4 units/acre)to i(lnStitutional). i0 · ---2-o--i 14 7 . · IJ , 8 : , 12 9 ti I0 , Avenue ' O' ~-- 20 I. 19 2 18 5 . 17 4 16 ,' 5 15 6 14 7 I~ 8 I 12. 9 · II I0 .5 AV"" i Il'il ~. L R7 · Community ~velOpment Geographic-Information Systems Map revised November 29, 1999 ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ u~ ~ a ~1~ bl~i~ ~. N 12 9 ! · 15 12 12 IL 1999 N Land Use //.6 Faith Church of Deliverance, Inc. Avenue ' O' It II 14 _ 7 ..... 13 8 --- , 12 9 , 19 : 2 18 ~7 ! 4 16 15 6 14 7 . .~_.~[.~ '13 8 · i2 . I/ I0 Ave. "L" IND RZ 99--025 This pattern indicates subject parcel. - Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised November 29, 1999 ~.,.,~, -.~ .as ~ made, to IXOvide tt~o mo~t currant and ac~ate ' 7:00 P.M. note that: ~all. proceedings - befo ~."e r .. considered at such meeting ~or hearing, he that, for such purpose, h ~. m~ need .to, record of the Upon, the request of any par~ ,w .the pw,ceeding, individUalsi sWOrn in. ~Any pa~ .W ~the proceeding ~will be granted an ~ to cross- Upon reqUest. Written~ ts received in public healing :will also be conSidered. Prior ~to this. pUbliC hearing, 13 1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. .St. Lucie County, on December 3' 1999~ ~' 11 plan~ing re-"-s~:qu~,: ~ ' 2406;50~0077i [Location: West:side of NOrth 43rd Street,. : . , :apprexi'mafei¥ ~§0 :feel n~rlh Of Aven. e , :"T'~ ':' : ~NC,,: for '; I~ARCEL A 'RIGHt: OF ~HE :NORTH 589.71 ~ ~AL~E:L ,ip~NT OF THENCE LOT 6 1'0' THE N©RTH ROAD, UT1UW :AND :DRA1Ni , E2 The News, Friday, December 3, 1.999 'ST, LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING 'AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA DECEMBER 15, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE ts .hereby g!ven in accordanCe with Se 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie.l ~nS of. 1. APOSTLE FAITH CHURCH OF, a Change (Residen- - 4 .du/acre)i Lot 6 {0.29 Aq I.D. No. 150 feet INC., for a Conditional· Use Permit~ to :allow a Bingo Establishment in the ~CG-(Con~merCiat, General)~ Zoning .District for the followingI described property:. PARCEL A South,. Range Plat Book 1, at l Public 'Records of ! Florida, as described and the nodh tine of said Lot 6;. o ,, ~ : JO' ~ thence South '27, 31' 40 East~a ng said westerly right-of. Way line of~ Florida State Ro~d No. 5 (U,S. t) for '465.00 feet; thence South 62°28'20'' West for 350.00. feet; thence North 27°31'40'' West for 589.,7,1 , feet~ thence North, 00°00 i9' East along a line paral, J lei tOthe west line of .said Lot 6 forl 79.73 feet to.a point of intersectioni on the north line of said Lot 6;I thence South 89°42'28'' East along, the' north line of said Lot 6 .f0rI 368.77 feet to the Point of Begin-! ning. Subjed to the north 16 feet and the southeasterly 30 'feet for road, utility and drainage purposes. PARCEL B-1 That portion of Lots 5, 6, and 7 of Block 3, Section 26; Township 36 South, Range 40 East, Plat No. 1 of St. Lucie Gardens as recorded in~ Plat Book 1, at page 35 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: Commence at the point of intersec- tion of the westerly right.of-way of State Road No. 5 (U.S. 1) and the north line of said Lot 6; thence North 89 42 48 West along the north !ine of: Lot 6,·. 358.77 feet to the Point of .Beginning; thence con- tin'ue North 89~42'28'' West along aforesaid line 60.00 feet; thenc~ - ' O ' il - ' ' South 00 0019 West, 230,00 feet; thence South 89°59'41" .East 142.87 feet; thence North 27°31'40" West 179.27 feet;: thence North 00°00'1.0'' East 7.0.73 feet fo the Point of Beginning. Less the north ~'~enty (20) feet of th~ above described parcels. (Tax I,D. No. ' 3414-501-1905-050/4). (Location: 8421-8453 South U.S. Highway No. 1 (St. Lucte Palm Center) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in Room 1.01., St. Lucie County Admtnistration BUilding, 23100 Vir. ginia .Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida ~n-December 15, 1999, beginning at 7:00 p.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Anyone .with a disability requir- ing accommodatiOn to attend thisI m~etlng should contact the St. Lucie! Coun~ C°mm~nity Sen4Ces Man-i ager at 561/462,1777 or TDDi 561/462,1428 at least .forty,eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. · PURSUANT TO section 286.0105, FlOrida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any deci- sion made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter Considered at a meeting or hearing, he ~,ill need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings ls made, which ~record includes the testimony and evi. dence upon which the appeal is to be based. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ CARSON /~CCURDY, VICE.CHAIRMAN Pub,: Dec. 3, 1999 PLANNING AND ZON~G COMMISSION ~VIEW: 12/15/99 File Number CU-99-009 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY ,DEVELOPMENT TO- FROM: DATE: Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Manager ~¢f' December'8,.'1999 SUBJECT: LoCAIIoN: Application. of St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Foundation, Inc. for a ConditiOnal Use Permit to allow a Bingo Establishment in the CG (Commercial, General) ZOning District. 8421 South U~S: HighWay No. 1 ZONING DESIGNATION: "CG (Commercial, General) LAND USE DESIGNATION: COM(C0mmerCial) . . PARCEL SIZE: 9,000 square feet ofpiaying area PROPOSED USE: Bingo Establishment The.subject prope~y is-surrounded by the CG (Commercial, General): Zoning District. SURROUNDING LAND USES.: FIRE/EMS PROTECTION· The subject property is surrounded by the COM (Commercial) Fu~e Land Use Classification. The general use of the surrounding property is commercial retail. Station #12 '(Walton Road) is located approximately 1 mile to the soUth of the subject property. UTILITY SERVICE: TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS Utility service is provided by Port St. Lucie Utilities. - RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY:. The existing right-of-way width for South U.S. Highway No. 1 is 200-feet. December 8, 199-9 Pagei2 Petition: SCHEDULED IM VEMEN'TS: TYPE OF CONCU~NCY DOCUMENT ~QUI~D: STAND~S OF None at this time. Certificate'of Capacity, In reviewing--this apPliCation for .proposed cOnditional' use, .the P.!~ng and zo~ng Commission shall. COnsider ~d make the 'following dete ohs: ' le Whefl~er ~the proposed conditional~use is in conflict with any ablepo~ions of the St. Lucre CountY'Land Development Cod ,, The Lucie CounW Land Development .Code..Section 3.01, General) e e Whether'and theextent to which the proposed condifiona!~USei uld havean adverSe imPact on nearbY proPerties; ~'~ '~ The prope~ies. The subjeet'ProperW to lnclu~ mg mass transit; e public facilities'in this area. demonstrate that the'proj ect will .be .se~ed bY .. significant adverse imPacts ,on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not ' natur- al enviroment. The proposed use is withinan existing December 8, 1999 Page 3 Petition- St. Francis of Assisi File No.: CU-99-009 bingo establishment must comply with all local, state, and federal regulations concerning its development and operation. COMMENTS The applicant, St, Francis of Assisi Catholic Foundation, has applied for the requested conditional use in order to establish a non, profit bingo parlor. Bingo establishments are allowed as a conditional use in this zoning'district upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners. Staff finds that this petition-meets the standards of review as set fo~ in Section 11,07.03 of the St, Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie.County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this 'petition to the Board of County CommissiOners with a recommendation of approval, with the following conditiOn: .-- ~ The Board of.County Commissioners shall reserve the right to :review the conditional use permit 'on a bi-annual basis to ensure that adequate paring is provided ~for the entire shopping center. If parking required .for St..Francis of Assisi Catholic Foundation, Inc. is found to be creating capacity problems for the shopping center, the C · ~ Board of COunty, ommiss~oners may ~mpose restrictions on the hours of operation. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attaehment hf Donald W. Miller, Esquire File SUggested motion to reco end approval/denial. ~ of this requested conditionaluse, AFTER CONSDE~G'THE TESTIMO~ P~SENTED D~G'THE P~LIC HEARING, INCL~~G ST~F CO~ENTS, AND T~ ST~~S OF ~V~WAS"SET FORTH .~ SECTION 11.07,03, ST, LUCIE COUNTY L~: DEVELOP MENTCODE, THAT THE PLANNING AND zo~G~co~iSSION ~CO~E~ TH~ 'ST. LUCIE CO~TY BOARD OF CO~TY COMMISSIO~RS GRANT ~P' ~.TO, THE APPLiCATiON OF ST..F~NCIS OF FOR A CO~iTiONAL' USE .PE~IT TO ~LOW 'A: BINGO EST~LiS ~T '~ THE CG (COMMERCI~,-' ) Z G DISTraCT, BECAUSE ... [LIST CONDITION(S)] MOTION'TO.D : ' sEcTIoN I 1,07.03, ST' LUC1E C DEVELOPM ' C~E, i Y MOVE , p 'Z C SS - ST.. LUCre COUNTY BO~~ OF 'CO~TY .COMMISSI RS D THE APPLIC. ON OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI CATHOLIC FOUNDATION, INC. FOR .A C .ITl USE PE~IT TO AL~ LOW A BmGO:EST~L!S m CG (CO , ) ZONING DiST~CT, BECAUSE .... [CITE ~ASON($) ~Y- PLEASE BE SPECWiC]~ Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations S., ,, o Purpose COMMERCIAL, GENERAl .'['he purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for a wide variety of commercial uses intended to serve a population over a' large market area, which" do not impose undesirable noise, vibration, odor, ~dust, or.offensive effects on the surrounding area, together with such ~other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with general commercial surroundings. The number in "()"following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in SeCtion 3.'01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be fi.~rther defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. Permitted Uses ao g. h. i. j. k. .. !. m. n. o. P; q. r. s. t. U. V. W. X. y. Z,, aa. bb. CC. dd. ee. gg. Adjustment/collection & credit reporting services Advertising Amphitheaters Amusements & recreation serVices - except, stadiums, arenas, race tracks, amusement parks and bingo parlors Apparel & accessory stores Automobile dealers (~) Automotive rental, repaim & serv. (except body. repairs) (7s~.?.s3.?~)' ,er se~ices (723/7,24) hardware and garden supply ¢2) Cleaning '" Printing Communications - except towers Compul ' programming, data Processing & other computer serv. ~struction serv. (office & interior storage only) Cultural; and nature exhibitions (~j~) Duplicating commercial art/photo..& Stenog, serv. (-/33) E~ - except public schoOls ¢2) I, research, management & related services and.leasing services (7~) judicial functions Farm services (o,z~) - . .- . FinanCial and ~real estate is (,54) nd crematory services GasOli Gen~ stores Health Home re and furnishings Land horticultural services Laund~, cleaning and garment services (~1) . -Membership organizatiOns - except for religiOus organizations as provided in Section 8.021011 this code (ss) ' ' Miscell, s retail (see SIC Code Major Group 59): (1) Drug,~ stores (2) Use~ merchandise stores (593) (3) Spoding goods (4) Book & stationary (s~42/5~43) Adopted August 1, 1990 118 Revised. Through 09/07/99 , 4~ ¸hh, kk. II. mm. nno oo. rt. $$, ff. W. (6) (7) (16) (17) (1) Tax tatum (2) Misc, MisCellaneous (2) (3) (4) (5) . Jewelry (5944) Hobby, toy.and .games (5~4s) Camera. & ~phot0gmphic supplies GiEs, novelty and souvenir.(s~z) (7383) ,.:' (59~) see (see SIC Code Major G,roup ~73): ~ ~rservices~o'~) Mobile. food ,~ - -Motion ~ - Motor vehicle commercial, parking & vehicle storage,: ~s~) . Museums', ga ~and gardens ¢4) .~. Personnel · Postal services WW, Lot Size Requirements Recreation facilities (~J~) r J Repair serviceso'6) '~ ~' ': ' ~ ~' t Retail trade'indoOr disPlay and sales only, excep, as ProVided-in ~~n!7,00.00. ,(.~) · Social se~ices: (1) (2) Child care *services ($=s) (3) Job training and vo~tional~mhabiiitation services ¢33) -Travel agencies. (~z~) Vetedna~ se~ices ¢?4) Lot size .requirements shall be-in accordance with Section 7.04,00. Dimension:al Regulations .Dimensional. requirements. shall.' be' in ~acCordanCe. With Section 7,04.00. e ~)ff-street Parking and .Loading Requirements Adopted August 1, 1'990 119 ReviSed ~Through 09/07/99 . . Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations Off-street parking ~and.'loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping :requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. Conditional Uses g. h. i. j. k. Adult establishments subject to requirements of Sec. 7.10.10. Drinking Places (alcoholic beverages) ' free-standing. Disinfecting & pest cOntrol services. (7342 Amusement parks. (z~j~) Go'cart traCks,. (70t) ,ds warehousing and stomge-mini-warohouses Marina-- ati0nai boats only. Motor vehicle,~ sorvices - body,ropair, camps. (1) k,, Stadi, ;. I. towers 'subject to the standards-of Section 7.10.23 Accessory Uses _ _ Accessory uses a.m subjeCt :to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Drinking places :(alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and/or civic, social, and fratemal o ... One singl dwelling unit contained Within the commemial .building, or a detached single,famil ing or mobile home, (for on-site security purposes-). Retail trade: · (1) Undistilled alcoholic beverages (accessory to retail Sale of food). b. C. Adopted August 1.1990 ~2o Revised Through 09/07/99 H3OV3fl S Ir£ L S g£ J. petition of St. Francis of Assisi Catholic SchOol Foundation, Inc. for a Conditional se Permit to Allow a Bingo-Establishment in the CG (Commercial General) Zoning District. ' ~rive Medit,erroneon Boulevard 'South I I I I I i I I i CU 99-009 This pattern..indicates subject parcel ,Savanna Club, ~'B°ulevardt Community Development Geographic Information Systems- . Map revised NoVember 29,1999 .~;;.~ .~.ury e.~.. nas peen .made .~o pm vide the most cun'ent and accurate ' ofrnatlon possible, it is. no{ intended for use as a legally binding document, 'I~T Zoni PUD CU RD RMH-5 I ! ! -99 · . This pattern rindiCates" subject parcel Fou~:a~ien, Inc. erranean vord South I' - r i I I I I ;avonno Club ~ , Bo,ulevard I ! 1 ,1999 Land RU St. Francis Use of Assi.si Cath.olic i ! !. .I i. I M -¢. Sch'ool FoUndation I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I Mediterranean i ! i i I I 1 ! 1 I BouleVard I I I I I I ~ i i i ! I I Sout. h RU I ! I '1 I 1 I I ! ! . I i CU .99-O09. This pattern indicates' subject parcel. Community Development Information. Systems Geographic Map revised November 29, 1999 . N AGENDA - PLANNING'& Z C ~ THURSDA Y, December 15, 1999 7:-00 P.~M. Petition of St, FrancisofAssisi iCatholiC Foun n, Inc., fora Con~o~l Use ,Permit to allow the-operation .-of a Bingo Establishment in ~the: CG (Commercial, General for the.folloWing described pr°Perty: (Location: 8421 South U.S, Highway No'l) Please note that 'all proceedings befo.re the :LOcal planning ~Agen~ .'are ~'elearonically recorded. If a person decides 'to appeal anY'decision ~de by the Local with respect to .any-matter .COnsidered at such_.meeting or hearing, he .wi!l ,. :~;~,~ record of the ~ e~su~ record of the' proceedings, and that, for. such purpose'-he. .~ ~need .to . . that ~a .ver~attm proceedings ..is ~de, which record indudes the testimony and evidence ..... n. ~"~ich the a eal is to be. based. Upon the request of any party to' th~ proceeding, .tndivtduals:te~~tng. . . . dur.ng a hearing will. be .sworn in. Any par~ to. the proceeding -will-be granted an..; ity to cross- examine any.individual testifying dudng a hearing upon request, advance.of the public hearing will also be considered. December. I, 1999. Legal notice Was publishedin the Port St. Lucie News ?~d :~e Tribune, newspapers'°f general circulation in St. LuCie County, on December 3, 1999' File. No. ¢U-99-009 D8 · The Tribune° Friday, December 3, 1999. .. ~ No. 1337 ST. LUCIE .. TO WHOM ~Y CONCERN: " NOTICE ':is hereby .given ~ .o'0~o3.' of lhe'provisiOnS Of the St. ,request: 1.' APOSTLE FAITH '. Change in -4 'SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 406.506.0077~00015). '(Location: "M" ;I 2.,.. ST, o · . [ · -I~ARCEL rA · THAT PORTION OF LOTS '5, 6~' 2a. TOWNSHIP 'LUCtE ,.THE: PUBLIC R~ OF ST. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT · RIGHT THE ROAD NO. ,~ES'f FOR 589.71 I~,~RALLEL "POINT OF THENCE SOUTH, '8~ LOT 6 FOR 368.77 TO' THE NORTH ROAD. UTILITY AND ,' t~,ARCEL THAT 'LUCIE THE NORTH :ALONG 00" 00'. THE · ":'::'. ~AX I';D., NO. 3414-501,1905,050/4):' '""'. . '~"" [Location: ,Pierce, .. · meeting. ' and. inclbdeS' the testimony ts'.to~ be. based. - IS~ Publish: December 3,'1999 E2 The News, Friday, December 3, 1999 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING AND-ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA DECEMBER 1'5, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby g!ven 'in accordance with Section 11.00,03 of the St. LUcie County Land Devel- opment Code .and .the provisions of. the St. Lucie County CC~mprehensive PI6n, the following applicants hovel requested that the SL Lucie CountyJ planning arid Zoning Commissio~l consider their folloWing request: I. APOSTLL= FAITH. CHURCH OF. DELIVERANCE, INC., for a Change,' in Zoning fl'om'ihe RS-41(Reslden- rial, Single.Family- 4 .alu/acre)[ zoning. E~islrict to the i (InStitution.`. al) Zo~iing District for the following describedprope~: ' - - Sedion 6, ToWnship 35 .South, Range 40 Section AC) I.D. No. :North '~13rd Street, approximately 150 feet north ,of A'v~nue "M~)~ 2. ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI CATH- OLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION, INC., for a Conditional-Use permit. to'allow a .Bingo Establishment inI the CG (C°n~merCial, General)~ Zoning District fC~ the. followingi described .properly: ' Plat Book I, at Florida, of Florida' (U.S, 1)' and the nodh line 6;! thence South 27°31 said westerly right-of~,way line of Florida State Ro~d No. 5 (U.S. 1) -for 46'5.00 feet; thence South. 62028'20''. West for, 3~0.00 feet; lhence North 27°31 40' West for 589.71 feet; thence NorthJ 00°00'19" East along a line para!-I lei to the west line of Said LoJ 6 for 79.73 feet lo a point of, intersection', on the nortll line of said Lot t o , l., · hence South 89 42 28 East atongl ~he nodh line of said Lot :6 forI 368.77 feet to the point of Begin-! ning. Subject to the north 16 feet and the southeasterly 30 feet for road, utility and drainage purposes. PARCEL B-1 That portion of Lots 5, 6, and 7 of Block 3, Sedion 26; Township 36 South, Range 40 East, Plat No. i of St. Lucie Gardens as recorded in! Plat Book 1, at page 35 of the' Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: Commence at the point of intersec- tionof the westerly right.of.way of State Road No. 5 (U.S. 1) and the north line of said Lot 6; thence North 89°42'48'' West along the line 158.77 f~et to aforesaid line 60.00 South 00°00'19'' West, 23 feet; thence South 89.59 1" 142.,8,7 ,feet; thence NOrth 27°31 40 ' West 179.27 feet; thence North 00°00'10'' East 70.73 feet to the Point of · a , Beginning. Less. the 'north twenty (20)' feet of the above described parcels.. (Tax I.D~ N6. 3414-50 I-1905-050/4). (Location: 8421-8453 South U.S. Highway No. I (SL Lucte Palm' Center) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in Room 101, SL Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Vir- glnla Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on December 15, 1999, beginning at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Anyone wlth a disability requir- ing- accommodation to attend this:. meeting should contact the St. Lucie l County Community ServiCes Man-: ager at 561/462-1777 or TDD. 56i/462-1' 428 at 'least forty.eight ~ He) hours prior to.the meeting. PURSUANT TO Section '286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides fo appeal any deci- sion made by a board, agency, .or commission with respect to any. matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he 'will need a record of the Proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings =Is made, which record includes tl~e testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal is to be based. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/CARSON MCCURDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN Pub.: Dec. 3, 1999 NOTI'CE TO P&Z BOARD MEMBERS The~re wi. Il 'be a special P&Z/LPA m.eeting January 24, 1999 (4th Thursday in January),, toreview' the Capital Improvements Element and make final recommendations to forward the plan to th'e County Commission. 4832 South U.S. 1 Fort Pierce,-Florida 349&2 MERRiTT REALTY INC. Edwin, $. Merr'rlt · . L~censed Rea~ Estate grotmr Ot'fice: (561 ) 464~972~1 After Hours; 464-3755 Fax: 464-~7.~3 Deaembe: 7 , 1999 Mrs. F: ra'nn~e' ' Hutchinson, Commissioner ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMMISSION 2 300 Virgtn£a Ave. Ft. P~erce, Fl.. 34982 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SiT~ LUC!E cOUiN,'Y¥.~ ~F~ ....... Dear Mrs. Hutohinson: noted that the Commi~sion on a four to one vote denied the applic ' ' ' '.atzon of BN~ partners ~o place a low income 'apartmen~ ~omplex on Lennard Road. When this item was' brought before hhe plann£n.g and zOning commission I vo~ed to approve based on no objections from ~he n~ neign~or~oo:~.or any par~ o~ the Count~ th~ wa~ in opposition. :he pr° osed P=oJec:. z =ravel Lenna=d Road on e ~eekly-basin and .did ~ot ~0Raider traffic a Problem. I to .~ote a day care area oa the site ~lan or 'probably would have questioned the idea of a senior retireme.nt facility. have noted zn the past that people do not attend :he hearings ~but. wili show u~ in force at the County Commission .m _e et _in ge . This leaves me to ben,eve the ~h~lb' little wei' ht to ' = .... ~ puts g how we may vote on a ma,:er. The co~iseion should c~naider opting to place the four fifths majority vote effortst° overrideand ~h?tlm~Piann~ngon t~e ~nd ~oning decisions. Tho~ mambo o~r effect. . Board wOuld have more meani.g, and Thanks for your time and consideration. Yours truly~ Edwin S. MerriEr Planning and Zoning Member bng.doc e_c: -- Offer,ins: -- ~ Ciitrus Groves · Agricuttural . Vacant Land , Income Producing- Commercial Industrial · Shopping Centers · Business Opportunltle~ . Residential DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Administration ME.MO RAND UM TO: FROM: DATE: D~~.. A/, ~n de. rso~)~;o un ty~Admin,~istrator . J ' :e~wch~,~opment  Director December 10, 1999 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Update Meeting Schedule Community Development Department staff is preparing the final element for the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan Update. 'It .is our Plan to submit the Capital Improvements Element to the Planning and Zoning .Commission/LocaI Planning Agency for review and approval at a special meeting on the fourth Thursday in January 2000. The date and,time for this speCial meeting will be January 27, 2000, at 7 p.m. This meeting will conclude the review of the proposed ComprehenSive Plan revisions by the Local Planning Agency. - , . We are proposing to submit the-fUll ~Comprehensive Plan update to the Boa;'d :of County Commission for review at four special meetings to be.held on the fourth ~nd second Thursdays in February, March, and April, at 7 p.m. The dates would be as follows: · · - 1 ) February 24, 2000 2) March 9, 2000 · 3) Mar(;h 23, 2000 4) April 13, 2000 5) April 27, 20.00 (make-up date) We will schedule specific elements to be reviewed and discussed at each of these meetings. The entire Comprohensive Plan .doCument Will be-transmitted to the County Oommission no lator than February 8, 2000. The Commissioners ~wili have a little mom than two weeks to familiarize themselves with the flint three elements for the February 24t", meeting. Please let me know if you know of any scheduling conflicts for the above medtioned dates, or if you have any questions. Thank You. Cc: County Attomey Asst. County Administrator Asst. Community Dev. Director Planning Manager