The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAugust 16, 2001 St. Lucie County Planning and ZomngCotmmssion Meeting MinuteS REGULAR MEETING August 16, 2001 Commission Chambers, 3l'diJrloor, Roger Poitras Annex 7:00ip.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Hearn, Mr. Trias, Mr. Jones, Mr. Grande, Mr. Akins, Mr. McCurdy, Mr. Matthes _ Chairman. MEMBERS·ABSENT: Mr. Lounds (excused), Mr. Merritt (unexcused) OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. David Kelly, Planning Manager; Ms. Cyndi Snay, Planner II; Ms. Heather Young, Asst. Co. Attorney; Ms. Dawn Wismer, Administrative Secretary. P & Z Meeting August 16, 2001 Page 1 CALL TO ORDER Chairtnan Matthes called to order the meeting of the St. Lucie County. Planning and Zoning COmmission meeting at 7:00p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. David Kelly made an announcement that Dawn Wismer would be the recording secretary for this evening's meeting. Chairman Matthes gave a brief presentation on the procedures and what to expect for tonight's meeting. For those of you who have not been here before, The Planning and Zoning COmmission is an agency that makes recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. The Staff will present a brief summary of the· project and then make their. recommendation. After which time, the Petitioner will be asked to come forward and state hislhercase for the requested petition. At any time the Board may stop and ask questions of the· Petitiofieror Staff. After that process is completed the Chairman will open the public hearing' for anyone who wishes to speak for or against the petition. The purpQse behind thishearÌ11g is to get input úom the general public. If anyone has somethifig to say, please feel úee to come forward and state it. After eve1Jione'ha$gotten a chance to speak the Chairman will then close the public hearing. The Board will delibera~eaµd then J;Ilake a decision regarqingtl1ejr recommendation,. one way or the other. T~edecision that is itµàdeistýpi¢ally readúoUia scriptþdsetof statements that are given to the Board. It may sound rehearse~ but itre~ll:r is not. . There.is on7 l1l1otipn ~o~ and one motion against in the package, so that the Board can ':rnñ.e a motion either one way or the otl1eri so it is. very clear in the records. Once again, I want to remind you that the. PlanningandZonihg Commission only acts in an advisory capacity for the Board of County COmmissioners. If yoµarendt happy with the outcome of this hearing you will have the oPPortunity to speak at the public heating in úont of the Board of County Commissioners. No other announcements or comments. P & Z Meeting August 16, 2001 Page 2 AGENDAITEM 1:...·.{une21".2001 MINUTES Mr.. McCurdy made am.otion forapprovaJ. Motion seconded by Mr. Grande. Upon a roD caHvote, the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 7-0). P & Z Meeting August 16,2001 Page 3 AGENDA ITEM 2:,Tti1v.26,2001MlNUTES Mr. McCurdy made a motion for approval. Motion seconded by Mr. Grande. Upon a roD call vote, the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 7-0). P & Z Meeting August 16,2001 Page 4 AGENJ)A:J'I'EM3:I..I]}EøœYBAPTISTCBURCB.FILENO. CU..Of"OOS StåffPI~e~. 9yri~i $naY,stat¢dthat Agenda Item #~. was the petition of Liberty Baptist Church, Inc. of F()rtPierç~'for~Gonditioµal.UsePetmittoallowed~çational services asanaccessoJ1Y use to a religious f~'1ility. ... Tl1þ'f~p~M~rjs··f9Íat~~at3600 West Mjdwa¥Road. ..Section 3.01.03(X).all~ws for educational facilitiesWitha.~9n~iti()~allIs~~enrrlt(lpproval. . Ms. Snay stated that the applicant has indicated that t~~ir~xis~in~c~Ufqhf~cµ~~ie~W~l1,beuti1ized and no new buildÌtJ~s will be required.. She further stated tha~tl1eproP9s~ii~on~tjpµa.IlJ]~eis note~peçted to: adversely impact tþe su~ounding properties. The ptopetíy tOtÃe.~oµ.t¡h and the west are both zoned I (Institutional). The properties to the north and east are zotled:Residential. Staff is recommending that the petition be forwarded to the Board of County Conunissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to three conditions: 1. This permit is to allow educational services for Grades K-50nly. Any additional educational services would require·a modification to the Proposed Conditional Use Permit. 2. The approved Conditional Use Permit is for the proposed 3.92-acre parcel of land only. Upon development. of the property, west of Dunn road, owned by Liberty Baptist Church, an additional Conditional Use Permit will be required to operate educational services. 3. Any expansion to the square footage for the Liberty Baptist Church facility that will be used for educational purposes will result in modification of the existing site plan and the proposed Conditional Use Permit. Ms. Snay also stated that petitioner has requested to change the request to include Grades K-12 and not just K-5. Chairman Matthes. questioned if the staff recommendation is for Grades K-12. Ms. Snay advised that staff did not feel thatany more traffic would be generated at this time if the petition included Grades K- 12. Mr. Kelly confirmed that he was in agreement. Chairman Matthes asked for comments úom the petitioner. Pastor Wallace Cooley introduced himself and advised that the church's desire was to start educational services in the Fall 2002. He explained that there was a misconununication and that they do wish to include Grades K-12. He advised that the facility would be starting. with dtades K-5and then adding several grades at a time each year. Pastor Cooley further stated that tIle existing facilities and classrooms used for Sunday·. school would be suitable for their Christian school. He thet) asked for. the Planning & Zoning Commission's approval and stated he wduld be happy to answer any questions they may have. Chairman Matthes asked for questions úom the Board. Mr. Grande stated that he had three questions of the petitioner: What they foresaw as the maximum number of students? What the transportation (busing) impact on the roads would be and what would be the impact on the existing septic system? Pastor Cooley answered that over the ftrst few years, they might only have 10-25 students. He also explained that it would be a number of yeats before those. numbers may increase to the level that they have on Sunday's. He stated that they havenp inteµtion of busing any of their students so he feels there should be no impact in that area., He advised that their facility already has · 3 existing septic systems that are sufficiefit for their maximum filled capacity. He does not feel that they will outgrow those facilities any time in the near future. P & ZMeeting August 16, 2001 Page 5 Chairrnan:Ma.tthesqu~Stioned What the approximate hours of operation would be. Pastor Cooley said theydOfiofbaveanysetschedule at this point in time, but may be around 8:30a.m to 13:30 p.m Chairman :Matthes aSked the Ðoard ifthèy had any further questions. Hearing none,Chairmatt Matth~söpenêd the Public Hearing. Seeing no one in the audience. Chairman Matthes closed the Public'Hearing. Chairman Matthes asked if the Board had any other questions of Staff. Mr. McCurdy asked to see the aerial map and what kind of property is to the north and west. Ms. Snay advised that those areas are both single-family residential homes. Mr. Hearn questioned if condition #3 would be an administrative modification. Ms. Snay stated that if any expansion would needto be done to the building, the petitioner would have to come before the. Board again. Mr. Kelly added that there is an administrative approval for small changes (he believes percentages of square footage etc) to the Conditional. Use. Any major changes would have to come back before the Board. Mr. Hearn stated that after considering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, including staff comments, and the standards as set forth in Section 11.07.03, St Lucie County Land Development Code,> I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County COmmissioners grant approval to the application of Liberty Baptist Church for a Conditional UsePerI11Ït to allow eduqational services as an Accessory Use to a religious facility in the I anstitutional)· Zoning District with the 3 conditions stated (including the modified cottditionalløwing Grades K-12 instead of K-$ only) because it seems to be a good additional use totheir existing facility and it would blend in wen with the neighborhood. Motion seconded by Mr. Grande. Upon a roD caD vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 7-0) and forwarded to the County Commissioners for approval. P & Z Meeting August 16, 2001 Page 6 ri" ~Ù\l~';'~:¡ "S~œ \~ 1v.1r'. Ue~a~k~dstaffJoratl. UPct~t~~e~ardi)rgtl1e. Aesfl1eticsOtdinafice that was disclJ$seð'~~~eral months ago. · Ms..Yotu1gadvised that it probably· would not be before the Board again until arqundOctober. Mr. McCurdY~dvis¢dthathe.nûght be out of town at the time of the next scheduled m~eting, No furtJ1erbusiness. Next scheduled meetifig will be Thursday September 20, 2001. AD.ToURNMENT Motion to adjourn made by Mr. Grande and seconded by Mr. Matthes. Meeting was adjourned at 7: 13 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Approved by: Dawn. Wismer, Secretary Steffan Matthes, Chairman P & Z Meeting August 16, 2001 Page 7 Agenda Item #----1 ST. LUCIE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION DATE: August 16,2001 Petition: June 21, 2001, Mînutes iVlR. lV1'bARL"trTT - MR. MCCURDY ISf · es -riJ,fR. . LOfJ'ftlDS _____ MR. GRANDE MR. TRIAS MR AKINS MR. JONES MR. HEARN MR. MATTHES VOTE: 1_- 6 COMMENTS: \", Agenda Item # --.l ST. LUCIE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION DATE: AUJ!ust 16. 2001 Petition: July 26, 2001, Minutes MR. MCCURDY MR. LO UZ-¡DS MR. GRANDE MR. TRIAS MR AKINS MR. JONES MR. HEARN MR. MATTHES VOTE: 1--.. () COMMENTS: is ¿s .f/5 ¿5 -es Agenda Item # ---1 ST. LUCIE PLANNING & ZONING.COMMISSION DATE: AUJlust 16. 2001 Petition: Liberty Baptist church, Inc. of Fort Pierce (Conditional Use in I Zoning) MR. GRANDE v V MR. TRIAS MR AKINS MR. HEARN 1st ~ ./ MR. JONES MR. MC CURDY v MR. MATTHES VOTE: ¡-D COMMENTS: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) QUORUM SHEET Meeting Date: August 16, 2001 ·Ed Lounds Charles Grande 229-9878 H YES Ed Merritt 464-9728 489-4671 H 462-2048 W YES Russell Akins YES Ramon Trias 460- 2200 W 468-9859 561-221-8600 W YES No-out of town, but if home, will be there Fred R.Jones Bill. Hearn 461-7526 Carson McCurd ,Vice Chair 466-7600 H ,/ES Stefan Matthes, Chairman 464-3537 W YES - per secretary 5 for quorum G:\Planning\Admin_Sec\Planning & Zoning\PLANNING\Þ&Z\PZ-DOCS\QUORUM.doc ~o\ t cQ'\ I7J PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) QUORUM SHEET Meeting Date: August 16,2001 Ed Lounds Charles Grande 229-9878 H Ed Menitt Russell Akins 464-9728 ~..8..9-..4..6. ¡f,. H .. -¡t:· '. :....- Q... W Ramon Trias 460-2200 W 468-9859 561-221-8600 W Fred R. Jones Bill Hearn 461-7526 Carson McCurd , Vice Chair 466-7600 H Stefan Matthes, Chairman 464-3537 W 5 for quorum ~}1 I~?7~ UV' IkfVl ~ H:\WP\WP\P&Z\PZ-DOCS\quorum.sht RevOllOl PLANNINGAND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) ROLL CALL SHEET For Meeting:. August 16. 2001 MR.. MERRITT ~o \ eS MR. McCURDY ~{R.LO UNDS - ~~;#if~.'j;; ~ w~ MR. HEARN MR. TRIAS MR. JONES MR. GRANDE MR. AKINS MR. MATTHES G:\Planning\Admin_Seç\Planning & St. Lucie County Planning andZoningConunissionILocalPlanning Agency Regula.r Meeting Commission Chambers, 3rd Floor Roger Poitras Annex Augusf 16,2001 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: A.Pledge of Allegiance 1~. Roll Call (~. Announcements I). Disclosures AGENDA AGEND}l ITEM1:MEETINGMINUTES-June21~ 2001 ActionRecolnmended: Approval Exhibit #1.: Minutes of June 21, 2001, meeting AGENDA~ ITEM 2: MEETING MINUTES - Julv 26~ 2001 ActionRecommended: Approval Exhibit #2: MînutesofJuly26, 2001,· meeting AGENDA ITEM 3.: FILE NO.CU- 01-005 Petition of LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. OF FORT PIERCE, for· a Conditional Use Permit to allow educational services in the I (Instìtutional) Zoning District. Staff comments by Cyndi Snay. Action Recommended: Forward Recommendation to County Commission Exhibit #3: Staff Report, .Site Plan, and Site Location Maps OTHER·}SUSINESS: A,. Other business at Commission Members' discretion. B.Next regular Planning and Zoning Com.mission meeting will be held on September 20, 2001, in Commission Chambers at the Roger Poitras Annex Building. ADJOURN NOTICE: All proceedings before the Planning and ZoningCommissionILocal Planning Agency of St. Lucie County, Florida, areelectronical1yrecorded~ Ifa. person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning·Co111t11issionILocal Planning Agency with respect to a.ny matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he willneedatecOrd of the proceedings, .andtltat, for such þU1'posc, he may need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,' which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. .Upon the rcquest ~fany party ~ö the proceedings,indiyid«áts tèstifying dJUin~ ~bearing\Vi1l beswømin. AnYPfty tøthe pr()ce~ding willbegrant~d an. oppQrt\U1Îty tocr()ss.e~neany individualtest~fying duri~a hearing upon request. . Anyøne\VithadisabHity requiring acco111t11ødation toatteI1d this'meeµng shouldcontacttheSt. Lucie qøunty Community Services Director at least forty--eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (561) 462...1777 or T.D.D. (561) 462-1428. Anyquestilons about this agenda may be referred to the St. Lucie County Planning Div.ision at (561) 462-1586. ~ St. Lucie County Planning and ZoningiCommission Meeting Minutes REGULAR MEETING June 21, 2001 Room 101, Civic Center at 7:00 p.m. MEMB]8jRS PRESENT: Mr. Lounds,.Mr.Grande, Mr. Akins, Mr. Jones, Mr. Menitt, Mr. Heam,Mr.Matthes, Chairman. MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Mc(~urdy, Mr. Trias (both excused) OTHER.S PRESENT: Mr. Dennis Murphy, Interim Community Development Director; Mr. Hank Flores, Planner III; Ms.·Cyndi Snay ,Planner II; Ms.· Heather Young, Asst. Co. Attorney; Sheree Bell,· Interim Administrative Secretary 0 June 21, 2001 P & Z.Meeting Page 1 CALLT.OORDER Chairman Matthes called to order the meeting of the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission at 7:00pm. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman· Matthes led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL (;ALL ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Lounds requested that a clock be placed in the room on the wall. Chairman Matthes gave a brief presentation on what you can expect to transpire tonight. For those of you who have not been here . before, we are an agency that makes recommendations to the County Board of CøIl1IDÌssionersandthãt istbecapäcityWeaTtin. What we will~o tortight isthat wewillbepre.sented on each pe.tition.\Vitha~riefs\l111t1UU)'0ftheprojectby staff after which. time the petitioner will come up and make his case. for the requested petition and change. At any time this Board will stop and ask questions of the petitioners or . staff. After that process is completed . we will open the . public hearing for.peoplewho wish to speak fororagaiµstt1~e~titi()~. . The 'purpose . behind this hearing is to gèt thè general. public input. Please, ifyouhayes0Jnethi~gto say., come forward and Sflrit.Aft~~~veI}'one.hasgotten a chance tospealç. for ora~ainstth~>p~titi~~ . ,we . Mlill clo~e the pu~lic · heaxiRg,staff \Vi11.~ke a.. fmal recoµunendation to this Boar4. , wc\Vi1l deliberafe and we will ~kea dec~s~on.~n oqr~e~onnnendation, one way or another. The decision that is. made is typ içally read < ~om a scri~~ed setof$t~t~~~nts that are given to us. It maysound!feh~~sed b~tit really is not. There iS9neforanq,one~g~st~iYento us in the package, so we may roakethemotioneither one way or the other so it is veryelear in the ,records. Once again, I want to remind you that this Board only acts in an advisory capacity to the Board of County Commissioners, after deliberatìon, a recommendation of either denial or approval. would. be forwarded to the Board·ofCountyCommissioners. If members of the public or the petitioners are not happy with the outcome of the hearing they always have the opportunity to speak at the Public Hearing in front of the Board of iCounty Commissioners. Chairman Matthes asked· what the proper procedure to follow was regarding the code ordinance discussed at the last meeting, since it was not on the agenda. Mrs. Snay replied that they Were still revising it, so the best thing to do would be to open and close the public hearing because they would have tore~advertise it. June 21,2001 P &Z Meeting Page 2 AGENDA ITEMl:MEETINGMINUTES- Mav 17~2001 Mr. Akins requested a correction in themìnutes. He's last name was misspelled as Aikeins. After the correction to the lninutes of the .May 17, 2001, Mr. Grande made amotion for approval, and Mr. Lounds seconded· it. Mr. Merritt arrived 7:05pm at the meeting. Upon a Jroll call vote, the motion passed unanimously (with a vote 0(7-0). Motion rnadeby Mr. Grande to open the Publìc Hearing for the continuation of ordinance 01-06. ChairmunMatthes opened the Public Hearing. Chairm~.n Matthes closed the Public Hearing for the code ordinance 'and stated that it will be re- advertis4ed to a date certain. June 21, 2001 P & ZMeeting Page 3 :Z[1rªg~G APPR01JAl AGENDA ITEM 2: FILENO. RZ-OI-008 Terrance and . VietoriaMills- Mr. Flores stated· that > Agenda Item· #2 is· the application for a Change in Zoning from a RMH-5 (Rcsid~ntial,NIoÞHe HOl11e...,. 5dulacre) Zoning District toa RS4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4dt1lacre) ZdningDisttictfor the property located at 4995 Deanna Road. Surrounding zoning is RMH-5 (Residential, Mobile Home... 5dt1lacre)to north, south, east and west. The general existing use suvo?ndipg~be~toperty Jsresiçential to the north, east and west with the St. Lucie County Airport 109a~ed fUlitherto ~hee~~t¡Thepetiti()n is. to request a Change in Zoning in orderto build ,a conventionally co~struçted si~gletfal11i~y homy t9replace a single 1110bile hOl11e. County staff h...s reviewed the proposed petition and determined, it conforms to the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land DeveloPment. code and is not 1n ¢ontlict. with the goal$, objectivesançl policies of the St. Lucie County CoJnprehensivePlan. Stafftecommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Conunissionerswith· a recommendation of approval. Chairman Matthes asked · if there were (2) two mobile homes on the property. Mr. Flores replied that tbere was only one mobile home and a garage. Chairman Matthes asked ·if the petitioner was present. Victoria Mills, the petitioner said that she would . like to build a cement . block home, it would be more economic:al than buying another mobile . home. Chairman Matthes asked if the garage was cement. block and if it will come down. Ms. Mills answered that the garage was woodframe and it will stay. Chairman Matthes asked if there were any questions of the petitioner from the Board. Hearing none, Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing. Ms. Becky Miller, 5264 Margaret Ann Lane, was in opposition of replacing a trailer with a home. She suggesteêL that Ms. Mills should build her house somewhere else. Ellen Revero of 5167 Margaret Ann .Lane indicated that the whole community .was a mobile home cOJ11mufiityand wondered if building a house there wasn't going to raise taxes and what it would mean for the owners zoning who want to stay in a mobile home residential area. Chairman Matthes stated that .he couldn't answer to the tax question because he doesn't have any expertise in that. Bufbecause this request was fora change in zOfiing for those ~wo parcels of land and nothing else it doesn't mean that anything else would change. He continued by saying that the Board looks at zoning on a case~by-case basis ~ Chairman Matthes explained to Ms. Revero·that the rezoning would only change the Mills' property. Ms. Jean Grenan, who has lived approximately 16 years in the Green Acres subdivision, opened up by saying that she was in favor of Ms. Mills being allowed to put a house on her property. She asked if they upgrade, ,;vould it have to remain a single..familyhome? Chairman Matthes responded that the rezoning is only fOf>Ms. Mills' property and that once it's rezoned he doesn't. believe that·a mobile home would be allowed to be put back on the property. June 21, 2001 P & Z Meeting Page 4 Mr. ·FloresconfirmedChairman.Matthes' . statement Chairman Matthes closed the Pnblic Hearing. Mr. Akins asked the staff if they weren't prohibited from spot zoning and was this petition doing that Mr. Flores answered that they were compatible for this area because they were going from a mobile home, which ¡sa residential use to a single family, which is still residential use. Chairman Matthes stated that anytime somebody would do something .that would increase the value of his or her property, he really doesn't have any problem with it He doesn't see it as a bad thing somebody wanting tobuiltsomethingbettetout of what they have,· he doesn't see how this would decrease the value of the sUJTounding area. Mr. LOllnds stated. that ..after·· considering. the testimony presented during· the Public Hearing, including staff comments,.and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03,StLucie County Land . Development Code,.·· I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning ·Commission recOl11Dl4~nd that the St. Lucie County Board of County Conunissioners grant approval to the application. of ·.Terrànce.·..8nd·.VietoriaMills· for a..Change·. in Zoning from.RMH·S to RS-4. He explail1~~cI... that .he felt.·ifwasan.Ïlnprovement· ·to. the..·area · that . could help ·the· value of .·theproperties and. he tllonghtifwasagood move. Motion seconded by Mr. Grande. Uponarollcall.vote thel11otionpassed.unanimously(wìth a vote of 1-0) for recommendation to forward to the County Commissioners for.approval. June 21, 2001 P &. ZMeeting Page 5 AGENI)A ITEM 3: FILENO. RZ-OI-Oll Pelican Pointe EastLand Trust Mr. Flotes state<! tnatA~~l1dältem #3 is the application for a Change in Zoning from a PUD (Planned Uni tDeveloprnent) Zonil1gDistrict to the HIRD. (Hutchinson. Island Residential District) Zoning District. The Sltl>lrctl1rOpêtt)flOt~téqQnthe ~astside of State Road A-I-A, southeast of the.Bouth Hutchinson Isl~nd Wr~t~~~t~rrreªtU1~t)tlfacilíty and directly south of the Ocean Bay Recreatíonparcel. Surrounding zoning Í.$HIRDto tne<soutnand the west; Institutional to the immediate north with Utilities to the Northwe~$t. ··Th~ general... ex.isting use ·surrounding the property is .vacant. The water treatment and reclamat~þn f~cility ar~ l()ç~têdn()rthwest of the subject property on tbe west side of State Road A~ I-A. CoµntYstaffij~sreYiewedt~e proposed petition anddetermî.ned itconfonns to the. standards of review as set. forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development.code and is not in conflict with!the·goals,.objectives and policies of the St. Lucie Cøunty Comprehensive P14n. Staff recoriunends tbat you forward this petition to the Board of County Commission~rswith a recommendation of approval. Mr . Grande · indicate.d that, the drawings he had in his packet are somewhat different because they show the entire PUDon th~east side, he questioned if the southern part of the property goes ocean to river. Mr. Flores stated that the subject of the petition tonight was only the northern piece, 7 acres:; the part under thePUD wasnotin the petition. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Flores if tbe piece that is not part of tonight's petition unit was part of the same parceL Mr. Flores answered no. Mr~. Grande. asked . if the piece . to the south of the· subject property would . still be POD? Mr~ Flores answered yes. Mr. . Hearn asked the staff if thePUD. for the · parcel that is· requesting the rezoning has· expired and if the petitÌöner wantedanew·PUD, could. he . g.et it? Mr. Flores answered yes, but he would still have to go through the rezoning process. Mr. Lounds asked ifthePUDforthe parcel south has also expired? Mr. Flores said yes that the PUDhas expired. for both parcels but they. are under different ownership and the owner of the· subject property .isseeking· HIRDzoning. Chairman Matthes· asked .if the·applicant was present. Peter Van Reus of KimleyHQrn and Associates introduced himself as a representative for the petitioner. Mr. Van ]{ens stated that fURDZoning is consistent with the area and most satisfies their needs. Mr. Grancie asked if the applicant had. any feeling at this point as to the number of units he could put on the site because he believed the land use is five per acre. Mr. Van I~ens stated the . land use in the area is nine per acre. Mr. Grande asked if ¡twould be up to sixty units. Mr. Van llensanswered that sixty would be right but they·were looking to build large units.· June 21, 2001 P & Z Meeting Page 6 Mr. Grande asked if it would exceed 7 or8 units. Mr. V an Rens respöndedthat they were still in the designing stage, but· they wouldn' texceed 9. Mr. . Grande informed. Mr. . Van Rens that the number of units is· neither negative nor positive from the review. He wanted to satisfy himself that the applicant understood the ·HIRD zoning and the expenses involved.withthe alterna.tive development fees. He continued, while asking the staff or the attorney to correct him, that the applicant would have to.pay $13,600 per unit in alternative development fees for each additional unit if he exceeded 7 units. To finish Mr. Grande suggested that he get a copy of theHIRD from the staff to make sure that whom ever is looking to develop understands the constraints. Chairman Matthes opened the Public Hearing. Chairmun Matthes closed the Public Hearing hearing. no comments in favor or against this petition. Mr. L011nds statedthat~fterconsidering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, includin,gstaffconnnents,.and the standards ·as··.setforth in Section 11.06.03, St Lucie County Land Developm¢ntCode,lhereby ...ovetb.atthe PltuUUngandZoningCo~ssi()nrec()Dunendthat the St. LucieCo\1nty ß()ardofC0ur.tY~$sionersgrant~P.Prøval to the application of Pelican PointeEast Land'frustf()r a Cbangein ,Z()ning from the PUDZoning District to the BIRD Zoning D~triçt. .ijeexplained. that he' felt. that it was a change in the right direction for r~idential property on South Hutchinson Island. Motion seconded by Mr. Grande. Upon a Jrollcall.votethemotion passeduuanimously (with a vote of 7-0) for recommendation to forward to the County Commissioners for approval. OTHER DISCUSSION Mr. Grande indicated· that on the second page. of the utility service it says that water and sewer will be providedbySt Lucie County utilities. St~ Lucie provides only sewer for this area~ June 21, 2001 P & Z Meeting Page 7 AGENDIAITEM 4:FILE.NO. CU-Ol-002 MBTB,INC Ms. Snaystated that Agenda Item # 4 is a petition fromMBTB, INCfor a Conditional Use Perm.it to allow> the construction of a 3,500 square foot convenience store, with accessory gasoline sales, to be known as Hess/Midway an.d Selvitz Roads. This facility will be located at the northwest comer· of the intersection of west Midway Road. and SelvitzRoad. Section 3.01.03{Q)(7) Commercial,Neighborhood Zoning District allows establishments-with the primary use of a convenience store to sell gasoline as a Conditional Use. The proposed site is sUFfoun<!ed on the north by AR-l (Agricultural, Residential - Idu/acre) Zoning, to the east and westbyCN (Commercial, Neighborhood) and Port St. Lucie RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family- 2dulacre~) to the. south. ·As far as the . site planning process, the developer.has been required to dedicate 20 feet of right-of--way adjacent to Midway Road and then 10 feet of right-of-way adjacent toSelvitzRoad. The staff recommends that this Board forward the petition to the Board of County Commissioners with· a recommendation of approvaL Mr.. Heamstated that acc.ording to the· zoning sheet the only zoning in this area other than the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) is the I (InstitutionaI}just to the west and the rest is residential. Mr. Hea:rnaskedhow long has the property been Commercial, Neighborhood? Mr. Murphy and Ms.Snay replied, since at least 1990. Mr. Hea.rnwondered if the· Conditional Use for gasoline sales as accessory to a food store· has co.meabout the last couple years. The staff responded that he was correct. Chairma:nMatthesasked if the applicant was, present. Mr. Boggs of Thomas Lucido and AssQciates introduced Mr. Brink. He stated that they would be entertaining anyquestiQns about landscaping and their development review process. He stated thatheWå$herea few.ll1onths.ago about another ga$ station. Just as with the other .One, . they have don,e their best to save trees on this one 'as well. Mr. Loundsaskedthestaff if there is not a ruling stating that between residential and commercial there should be a barrier. The staff confirmed that there was such a requirement. Mr..HearndecIåredthåthewashavingsomei~roblernwith the issue not becau$eit is.nota good plan. He believed it could work on this location, however, he requested that the staff read out loudthe ~{erbiagethat is in the Commercial, Neighborhood into the record. Ms. Snay read the following "the purpose of this districtis to provide and protect an environment suitable. for limìted retail trade and service activities covering a relatively smallarèa and that is intended to serve the population living in. surrounding neighborhoods". June 21,2001 P & Z Meeting Page 8 ~~iM1~:'t~a1G~ Mr. Heaxnilldicatedthat it Was a big stretch to. say· thatiliis facility wiH only"'service the sU1T()undingneignbothoods.He said that ìfheowned a property to the south where all the subdi videdlot$ · ct()SS west. M~dway Ro~4,. he would . like to· see some more· protection from. the impact()fthi$:devel()~Te?ton,thatParticUlar åtea. EIebelieved that the propertyto the north and west arebei~$protetì~dbecaQsea IQtofthat land is ~ndeveloped there His major concern was a 24~bour opep~tiom 'r'j~hacat1 \Vash¡i that will impact the residential use of that· neighborhood acro~s tb~str~t.: He:~q~J;lowledgedtlJ.at it isa (Jonditional. Use not COnnnerci~h .General so they can tell tl;Ie~e¥eloJ?~r ,hat th~y have to have to develop there. He raised the pøint that a gasoHne station andcß.r wasn¡canhaveapretty serious impact on residential use. Mr. Grandestáted.· that he shared Mr. Heam'shesitation even though he has it for slightly different reasons; he explained that he was having a tough time looking at the plan as a convenience store that has gas pumps. He viewed·it as a gas station that happens tohave.a small convenience Junction iJil örder to make it legal. He would rather judge this application as a gas station than as a conve#ìel1ce store. As a gas station he wouldn 'thave . a problem. with it, but was having a toughtitnego~11'g to the Board .of County CoII1l11issionersand saying we ate presenting you a c()nveniencestorcthathappens to have accessory gas pumps next to it. Chairman Matthes asked Ms..Snayìfthe mobile station across the street was a Conditional Use. She answered negatively; and stated that was approved under a previous zoning terminology that allowed it as a permitted use. Mr. Merritt stated his ŸOtléemábol1tthe limited å1I1ount of commercial on west Midway Road, from the rivet westândthete Wêre already 3 existing gas stations probably within a mile. He disagreedthatthiswQuldbe the highest best use for the comer. Mr. Boggs stated the primary use was a convenience store. Mr. Grande said that he would feel a l()t better about this application ¡fit Were a zoning change to a Commercial, Generalpro.perty that would allow a gas station, as a permitted use. Mr. Menrittrepliedhe was still against the gas station. Mr. He am addressed Mr. Brink and asked if this operatiotlwOl1ld be a similar type operation to the gas station at the comer of U.S. #1 ândState Road A.t,..A going to Northaeach that opened up in the last · year and a half. Mr. Brin]k replied yes. Mr. Brink infol111¢d them that the one across the street that they were talking about was a corporate store. Thìsstore will be an individual operator. Mr. Hearn asked Mr. Brink ìfhis store would be a 24-hour operation. June 21, 2001 P & Z Meeting Page 9 Z~DNiN·G f.11,1~~ P· ~ A IVAI í:~¡;.9f 'UI!\i'" . k"aid ; lì1.,J' ..... Mr. Brink answered that he was not 100% sure at this point whether we will go 24-hour or not. Mr. He am stated that would definitely influence his vote with the residential property across the street and nearby. He asked Mr. Brink if he would be willing to do l1lorebuffering along west Midway Road. Mr. Brink answered yes, but they still need some visibility. Mr. Hearn. said 'he was trying to cut·.down on the light exposure to the residents and the noise factor. Mr. Boggs added, on the other side, . there is a canal that has a pretty good stand of upland vegetation on the south that buffers the ;back of the single-family lot and on the south. side of Midway they could also ,provide a buffering for the lights. Mr. Hearn asked him if it that was on publicly owned 'property. Mr. Boggs replied that he believe(! that it·. was. Mr.. Loundsmentioned toMr.Heam that there is a drainage ditch·-that puts a lot of distance . between· thesubjectprøperty and the residential homes. Mr. Lounds' asked Mr. Boggsh.owfarthecenterlineofMidwayRoad was to the residential property on the other side of this Re~~aICircleto the backside of the subject property. Mr. Boggs and Ms.Snay stated it 'was approxilnately ·120 feet. Mr. Lounds stated when travelingSelvitz Road,/itishard.to see that. intersection because of the curve OflMidway Rd. and with the vegetation growth combined with the distancê of the drainage ditch makes a good buffer. Mr. Loundshadmoreconcem for the noise from Midway Road than the Mo1:)il or.Hessstations. Mr. Brirlk pointed out that the canopy would be above the pumps on the side of the station not on the front of the station. So the lighting would be on the back off the road. Mr. Jones asked if the Mobil station is a 24-hour operation, to which Ms. Snay responded that it is not but could be if they choose to. Chairm.an Matthes opened the Public Hearing. Diane Sides fr()W4911Selvitz Rd. introduced herself and stated that shelive$ behind the subject 6~acre · prope.rt:yand was ·c()tl¢eme(l with future development with that area. She opposes the station because their home . is situated to hear all the noise. Chairman Matthes . asked if the area between the property andherbome was a wooded area. Ms. Sides answered that it is. Chairman Matthes statedtbatcert~ll buffer ¢riteria have to>Þemet for any future conunerCial development on that parcel. Chairman Matthes affirmed there is going to be a County Commissioners meeting and they always have the final decision. There were no further public conunents. Chairm~ln Matthes closed lhePublic . Hearing. June 21,2001 P & Z Meeting Page 10 Discussion ·Mr. LOtlnds stated with things changing it will make it aconcem for people in Regal, Rugby and the rest of the area. He saidthe noise on Midway Road would be even more a concern if he were living along there than it would be of the businesses north of Midway Road. With future growth, somethin;g is going ta take·1.lp that space. .He believed that this company has a good reputation for not onl)rmaintaining. the integrity of their property: but also maintaining a fresh atmosphere. He also stated that the landscaping that had been presented to the Board was above and better than what is at the Mobil station on the other comer. Mr. Loundssupports the station. Mr. Grande stated that he could not ·support the petition at this time because commercial is commercial.and he.believes this is not a Commercial, Neighborhood which serves the entire neighborhood, as opposed to commercial supported by the County as a whole. He would like to see this come back as a zoning change to Commercial Property classification that will support a gas station on. its own or use it . fora higher and better commercial use that support the surrouncling community. . Mr. Heamstated he doesn't believe that the Board is protecting property owners' investmentin the community and this might be one· of the. strong reasons why many people are reluctant to invest in the community. They don't feel that they have the protection that they need far their investmf~nt For that reason he· was not going to be· able to support this, reluctantly, because he thought it is a good plan but the intensity of the use that's there, he believed it is not compatible with the sutrounding neighborhood. Mr. Aki11S asked the staff if there were any specific reasons why the petition was presented as Commercial, Neighborhood as· opposed to Commercial, General. Ms. Snay explained that the zoning is Çommercial, Neighborhood and it does allow for convenient stores with gasoline pumps . without the Conditional Use. Commercial, General Zoning would require an amendment to theCo~mprehensive Plan. Mr. Lounds indicated that the area south of thatintersection is going to expand and build despite what is()n Midway Road. Mr. Menitt reiterated that he had the same opinion as Mr. Heam and Mr. GraIlde. Thereìs very little commercial zortingbetween the river and the turnpike and that the gas·station is in the wrong place. The comer isgoing·to be needed for something else that's probably a higher and better use. Chairman Matthes stated he realizes that Midway Road will become one of the major intersectitons in the County. The area·is surrounded to the south by very a large residential area and to the north by areas that are going to change as agriculture changes. He stated that this isn't the appropriate zoning as a Conditional Use but the same situation exists across the street. He doesn't think that the gas station is going to have half the effect as the widening of the Midway Road will have. He really doesn't see a problem with what's been presented; hejust wasn't sure aboutthe approach, going with a Conditional Use to a Commercial, Neighborhood but precedent was set across the street. June 21, :~OOl P & Z Meeting Page 11 ."" " ",,::,'; "H & l\:J!\"l~\?, " 1",( ",,",';"- d \,,,,,4 f~ r)',.)~n~ i\l \i,:':;::;~C~ ~~ ;~.:: ;,~,~,~ r~t\ ... r\\t·~ i\ ~ Mr. · Grande . asked . for clarification', of the . Mobil station· zoning. Ms. Snay resþ:oíïdèd~t1iãt the approval was granted as a.permitted use forthe Mobil station before the code change. Chairman Matthes explained the code change was done so that· the Board . could take a closer look at the use of gas stations and that was the purpose and intent behind making it a Conditional Use. He ·continued to say' that the· site plan ..is ..good. In his opinion the comer has plenty of potential but right now it will fit into that location. Whether or not it should be under a Conditional UsetoCormnercial, Neighborhood or whether it should come in as a Commercial, General and. whether or· not a zoning change will even stand the test is another question. Seeing 110 further discussions Chairman Matthes asked fora motion. Mr. JOlles stated that after considering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, including staff . comments, and the standards. of review as set . forth in Section· 11.07.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, he..herebymoves that the Planning and· Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County' Commissioners grant approval to the applicatJionofMBTB, INC.· fora Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a3,SQOsquare toot C()nY!m~~ce $t(u:ewith9 gasolinepwftps a,danautonµ}ticcar wash known as Hess Station in the .. C0nJ11le..~¡aI,NeighbQrhOOd~pin~'istri~t, because. be feels it .isan appropriate use. of the property and its adjacent to a similar use and believe the future widening of Midway Road and other things that are going to happen in this area are going to be abiggeril11pact in this neighbothöod than this store. Motion seconded by Mr. Lounds. Upon'8 roll. call vote the motion passed with a vote· of 4-3 for recommendation to . forward to the County Commissioners· for approval. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Merritt proposed · that because of this issue,tltwo gas stations on one·intersectionH, the Board take a look at Palm Beach County code where they restrict atmajor intersection one gas station. He believed it is a good plan they had and as fast as the county is growing he hates to see a gas station on every comer. He believed there should be more control· over it . The Chaitman asked Ms. Bnay if the staff could get a copy of the Palm Beach County code. Mr. Lounds stated that Mr. Grande brought some interesting points the difference between commercial, Commercial, Neighborhoöd and realizes there is a need to understand a little bit more the differences between the zoning levels. June 21, 2001 P & Z Meeting Page 12 Next scheduled meeting is July 19,2001. Mr. Merritt mentioned that Dennis Murphy was currently Interim Community Development Director. AD.TOURNMENT Mr. Lounds made a motion to adjouroand seconded by Mr. Merritt. Me~ting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. FŒCORDINGSECRETARY REVIEWED BY June 21, ~~OOl P& Z Meeting Page. 13 St. Lucie County Planning.andZoning.Commission Meeting Minutes REGULAR MEETING July 26,·2001 Board of County Commissioners Chambers, 7:00 p.m. .' ~ .:"I- MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Lounds, Mr. Heam,Mr. Trias, Mr. Jones, Mr. Akins, Mr. McCurdy, Vice-Chairman. MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Men·itt, Mr.· Grande,·Mr. Matthes, Chairman (each excused) OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. David Kelly, Planning Manager; Mr. Hank Flores, Planner III; Ms. Cyndi Snay, Planner II; Ms. Heather ~{oung, Asst. Co. Attorney; Sheree Bell~ Senior Accounting Clerk, Mr. Ed Beck. JULly26,2001 P& Z Meeting Page 1 CALL TO ORDER Chaitm¿tn]VfcCurdYCâlled to order the m~etifig ofthe St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at 7:00·pm. PLEDG,E OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman McCurdy led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL (~ALL ANNOUNCEMENTS Chairman McCurdy' gave a brief presentation on what you can. expect to transpire tonight. For those of you who have not been here before, we are an agency that makes recommendations to the County Board ofComrrnssioners an.d that is' the capacity that we act in. What we will do tonight is that we· will. be presented on each petition with a bri~f summary of the project by staff after which time the petitioner . will come up. and ma.ke his.ca.se · for the requested petition. and cha.nge. ·At any. time this Board.. will stop . and ask questions òfthr petiti()~rsòrs~ff. .~tthatprùèess. iscompleteq· we will o~n the public .hearing for people. who wish to sp~;;tkf~r Qr~gain:st~epetition.. 'Fhepurpose. behind thisheariug to is to get the general public. input. ·,.~le~se if~ouh~~e$QUj1Ctþiµ~ço sa~,c0tI1efor\Var~~d say it. Aftereveryqnehas gotten a chance tospeakfQfor~?ai~~tth~~ti~~n.\V~ \Vi.ldQs~thepublic hearing,staff\ViU ~eafinal recommcndationto tl1i~ ~~ard,w~~illd~U,ra~ ~~4 ;-veiwill ~~d~is~on.onour æcq~4ation, one way or another.. 'I'~e~ecis~<Yn,t~~is~(rist~~c¡Ùlyr~dú0nJ.tlscripted set~fsttl~~ent~that ~ given to us. It mayso~n~~bef"~~~~t.~~r~~ is¡~~t, ~he~~ i~one.for'~4onea~~inst~e~tous in .the package, so we may make the' l11øtiøt;1(1itberonewa.yor toe oth¢f so it is very clear in ther~cords. Once again, I want to remind you thal we only act in an advisory capacity to the Board of County CommissiOnersafid if yùu are. not~apPY!ith theoutcoQ1e ofthe hearing you always have the opportunity to speak at the public hearing in frontoftne iBoardof County .Commissionerson the petition in front of us that · will· be forwa.rded to them With a rec omtriendati on of either denia.l or-approvaL Mr. Kelly made an announcement regarding the errors on the ad & apologized to the Board and the public for any inconvenience. Chairman McCurdy and the Board accepted the apology. No other announcements or comments. July 26,2001 P & Z Meeting Page 2 AGENDA .ITEM1:.June21~.2001MINUTES Chairman McCurdyask:ed where the minutes · from last month ' s meeting were. Mr. Kelly advised that.. they were not· available for review due to difficulties and would be available at the next P&Z meeting along with this month's minutes. July 26,2001 P & Z Meeting Page 3 AGENI)A ITEM 2: New Horizons of the Treasure Coast -File·No.CU-Ol-004 Æî~ ~ {I!, r.:. n 1"\ lIJ :! ,r."~ .;f",¡ ñ .0> ~~ m ~"'f) P '''Tt . lvtJ~h!Yhð~;§::~ t~~ h,~'~ ¡{á>:rni'!l1 -.. &"B i'ílUt' HD"" :,) Staff Planner, Hank Flores statedthatAgènda Item 2 was the Petition of New Horizons of the Treasure Coast fora Major AdJu$tment loan Existing CondìtionalUsePermit to allow mental health facilities (medical and other health serviees) in the I (Institutional) Zoning District for 9 .06 acres of proJ?erty located at 4500 West Midway Road. Staff finds thatthispêtition meets the standards of review as set forth· in the Laad Development Code and is. not in cOI1f1ictwiththe Comprehensive Plan. Staff recomtnc~ndsthatyouforward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendationforapprovaI. No spøcial conditions have been recommended. Chairman McCurdy.asked.the Board if there were any questions for staff. Hearing none,·· Chairman McCurdy then asked if the petitioner was present. Margie Silberman, CEO for New Horizons of the Treasure Coast stated that they· were requesting a Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use Permit, as stated previously by Mr. Flores, so that they may make renovations to an existing house on the property. This house will be utilized as offices fortheir staff. Chairman McCurdy asked if there were any questions for the petitioner from the Board. The Board responded in the negative. Chairm~lnMcCurdy opened the Public Hearing. Cindy Cøoper,a nearby resident, stated thata New Horizons staff member told her that the home was going to be· used as part of the mefital facility. Chairman McCurdy reque$ted that the applicant clarify the use of the~property. .Ms. Silberman reiterated that New Horizons plans to use the home for their· office staff only. Mr. Loundsasked.Mr.~elIyiftheydiddecide to use the home as part of their mental facility, did they ¡lave to submit anew applicatiQn? Mr. KellyconfiI'D1ed that they would have to submit anew petition fè:>ra Major Adjust:mentto an E~istingC()nditional Use ,Permit. Mr. Flores also conftnnedthis informatiøn. Mr. Lounds reconfirmed what he had understood from Mr. Kelly and Mr. Flores. Chairman McCurdy· then asked again if there was anyone else . present who wished to address the. Board regarding this matter? Hearing none, Chairman McCurdy closed the Public Hearing. Chairman McCurdy returned to the Board and asked if there were questions for staff or the applicant. Seeing none, he·requested a· motion. . Mr . Jones stated that after considering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, including staff comments, and the standards as set forth in Section 11.06.03,St Lucie County Land DevelopnlcntCode, I hereby move thatthe Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board· of County Commissioners grant approval to· the application·ofNew Horizons of the Treasure Coast for a Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use Permit to allowmelltal'health services in the I (Institutional) Zoning District because· the ·use was consistent with the ·e:xisting··facility operations. Motion seconded by Mr. Akins. Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 6·0) for recommendation to forward: to the County Commissioners for approval. JUlly 26, 2001 P & Z Meeting Page 4 AGENDA ITEM 3: Bin20Entnorium - File No.CU-01-003 Mr. . Kelly asked that since there was DO representative for the petitioner at the hearing, could we move Agenda Item 3 tolastto allow them time to appear? !lPP~1ÛV J.~l Chairman McCurdy asked the Board & they unanimously agreed. NOTE." Agenda item #4 -Century 21- PNRD, was heard during this time. The minutes have been adjusted for clarity. At 8:00 p.m. Chairman McCurdy reopened the Public Hearing for this petition. Staff Planner, Hank Ploresstated that Agenda Item 3 was the petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Bingo Establishment in the ·CG(Commercial,·General) Zoning District for the property located at 8441 South u.s. Highway No. 1~ The applicant, Bingo Emporium,. has applied for the requested conditional use in order to establish a non- profit bingo parlor with approximately 9,000 square feet of playing area. Bingo establishments are allowed as a conditional use jn this zoning district upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners. On January 18,2000, the Board of County Commissioners, through Resolution 00-004, approved a conditional use permit for· St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Foundation and Entertainment South, Inc. - a Non..ProfitCorporation to operate a bingo establishment in the same location. No bingo operation was ever established· and the. conditional use permit has. expired. In order to reactivate.thebingo establishment, . anewconditíonaluse permit must be approved. Staff fin(lsthat this petition meets the standards of review asset forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this: petition to the Board of County Commissìøners with a recommendation of approval, with the following condition: The Board of County Commissioners shaD reserve the right to review the conditional usepenniton a semi-a)(}nual basis to ensure that the proposed project will not have an undue, adverse effect on traffic conditions and parking for the entire shopping center.. If the Board of County Commissioners determines thafparking.required for Bingo·Emporiumis creating capacity problems for the shopping center, the Board may impose restrictions on the hours of operation. Chairman· McCurdy asked if the Board had any questions for the staff. Hearing none, Chairman McCurdy then a.sked for comments ·Úüm the petitioner or their representative. Neither was present at this time. Mr. Kelly suggested that even though the petitioner was not present, since this is a renewal of a previously.approved (but not used) ·ConditionaIUse, that the Board considers its approval. Cha1rman McCurdy asked· the Board· if this was acceptable and they unanimously agreed. Chairman McCurdy opened. the Public Hearing. No responses. Chairman McCurdy closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hearn stated that after considering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, . including staff comments, and the standard~ as set forth inSection 11.06.03, St Lucie County Land Developnlent Code, I hereby move that the Planning and .Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Bingo EmporiuJnfora·ConditionaIUsePermittoallow,8 bingo establishment in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District, with the stipulated conditions regarding trafficaud parking. Motion se~onded by Mr. Jones. July 26, 2001 P & Z Meeting Page 5 "Upona<roU~'votetb~ntotio~p~sedunanimously (with a vote of 6"0lforrecommendâtiontO forwartilto the County Commissioners for approval. July 26, 2001 P & Z Meeting Page 6 I j AGENDA ITEM 4: Centurv21-PNRD - FileNo. RZ~Ol~012 t . Staff Planner, CyndiSnay statOO Agenda Item 4 is the petition of Century 21 Real Estate for a change in zoning fjrom theHIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) .Zoning District to the PNRD (Planned Non-Res¡idential District) Zoning District for .27 acres of land located on the west side of North A-I-A, immedia.tel y söuthof the North Hutchillson IslandW aste Water Treatment Facility. ...' . ~ I. .: ;. ^ The subject property is surrounded.to the north with Utilities zoning and to the south, east and west with HIRD(IIutchinson Island Residential District) zoning. The existing uses are to the north - North Hutchinson·lslandWaste Water Treatment Facility, further north Pepper Park; to the northeast is the Sea Palms. Condominiul1l, further to the northeast is the SEAL Museum and the eastern portion of Pepper Park, directly east ate two vacant lots, approximately 61 feet in width, to the· southeast is the Tiara Tower Condominium and to the south, and west is vacant· land. Further to the South is the. entrance to the Sands Condominium, then a stripcenter,apartrnents and then Cumberland Farms commercial center. The applicant is proposing to construct a real estate office that will be 1,792 square feet in size and have a maximul1[} height of 16 feet. Staff has reviewed this petition and found it to satisfy the St. Lucie·.County Land Development Code and the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, staff is recommending that this petition be. forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to two conditions: 1. The subjectpropertybepennitted a reduction in the number of required parking spaces from nine to six. 2.· The approval granted is conditioned for the construction and operation of a real estate office only, any other use will be required to modify the Planned Non-Residential Development and be granted approval to operate in this location. Chairman McCurdy asked for comments' from the petitioner or their representative. Ed Beck introduced himself as a representative for Larry & Diana Stewart of Century 21. Mr. Beck stated that he agreed with the staff recommendation. He further stated that due to the location of the North HutcmnsofiJsland Waste Water Treatment Facility and sewage ponds the proposed location was not suitable fora residential home. He went on to explain that a review of the area uses include: a commercia.l center approximately ~.mile south, then apartments and at the comer or Sea Way Drive· and A-I-A, appro~imately 2 miles from the site is a gas station and another small strip center. In hišQpinion, the proposed JþCtition is not considered a spot zoning. . The applicant, Century 21, has plans to construct a building that will resemble alow...rise house with a garage and will be used for office space only. Century 21 is currently located in the strip mall approximately ~ mile south of the proposed location. The current lease will expire within 2 years. Therefore, the proposed building will be constructed before the end of the· current lease~ He then stated he would be happy to answer any questions and asked for the Planning & Zoning Commission's approval. Chairman McCurdy asked for questions of the staff. Mr. Akins had questions regarding the lease of property. Mr. Beck responded he would not like the date of the expiration of the lease to be public record. Chairman McCurdy asked if there were any other questions from the Board. Ju.ly26,2001 P & Z Meeting Page 7 Hea.ring none, Chairman McCurdy opened the Public Hearing. ¡1 & (~ 0 J(fl I~:~ ~ i· S ~ LJ ~.j Mr.·WalterSimmons stated that he resides at 3150 North A~l-A in Unit # l002N, which he maintains is directly across from th~ subject property. Mrs. Simmons presented a letter to be placed in the official record. Mr. SiIl1mons had questions regarding the. HIRD and PUD discrepancies on the areas west and south of the subject property. Ms. Snayclarifie<i HIRD bound~es & pointed out that tills problem was addressed in the memo dated July 2$, 2001 from Mr. Kelly in response to Mr.·& Mrs. Simmons' letter. Mr. Simmons went on to state he felt that the proposedproject did not meet the compatibility and neighborhood character test Mr. Trias asked Mr. Simmons what he felt the neighborhood character was and how the proposed property would changethe quality of their living on the island? Mr. Simmons stated that was the responsibility of the applicant to determine the·character of the neighborhood. He was unable to establish what. the current character of the neighborhood is. Mr. Simmons also stated that he feels that if the zoning is changed it will set a precedent· in the area. Mr. Lounds & Mr. Heam had comments regarding the landscaping around the property. Mr. Lounds then clarified the conditions set. Mrs. Sandi Simmons (wife of Walter Simmons) stated that she just wanted to reiterate what her husband· had said and to let the Board· know that she too was against the petition. Mr. Richard Sunderman of3150 North A~l~A, Unit # 903 stated he was opposed to this petition. Mr. Akins asked him what he· would rather see on the· site and Mr. Sunderman responded "weeds" . Mr. Steve Bauer of Sea Palms also stated that he was opposed to this petition. Mr. Lounds asked both of them how long they had lived· on the· Island. Ms. Shirley Burlingham, President of the North Hutchinson Island Home Owners Association, stated that she would much rather·see this 16-foøt tall office building than a 9-story condominium. This would still allow them to enjoy their beautiful view. Her only concern was the sign being illuminåted24 hours a day. She did question thepossibilìtyofpetition:ing for a universal code regarding signs on the Island. Chairman McCurdy closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hearn addressed the staff regarding the petitioner's willingness to add some landscaping to the north side of the· property. Ed Beck stated that they would be willing to consider it. Mr. Lounds stated that after considering the testimony presented during the Public Hearing, including staff comments, and the standards as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recotnlUendthat the St.J';.ucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approvalto the application of Century 21 - PNRD for Preliminary Planned Non..Re$idential Development and a CJ1ange in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development -Century 21) Zoning Districtto allow a real estate office, subject to the conditions thatthe number of require d pårkil1g spaces be reduced from nine to siX, that the operation be a real estate office only and that landscaping be provi.ded along the north property line. Any other use wouldl require ä modificatiön to thePNRD and be granted approval. Motion seconded .byMr. Hearn. Upon a roll call vote the motion passed unanimously (with a vote of 6-0) and forwarded to the County Commissioners for approval. July 26, 2001 P&Z Meeting Page 8 No furtller·business. Nextscheduledrneetingwill August 16,2001. AD.JOU·RNMENT Motion to adjourn rnadebyMr. Loundsand seconded by Mr. McCurdy. Meeting was adjourned at 8:07 p.m. July 26,2001 P& Z Meeting Page 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJE(:T: LOCATION: ZONIN(; DESIGNATION: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 08116101 File Number CU-OI-005 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning and . Zoning Commission Planning Manager f' Augu,st ,7,2001 A,pplicatiOfi of Liberty Baptist Church for a Conditional Use Permit to allow educàtioí}al,services (grades K - 5) as an accessory use to a religious facility in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. 3660 West Midway Road {Northeast comer· of Midway Road & DuIinRoad) I (Institutional) LAND U·SE DESIGN.ATION: PARCEJ~ SIZE: PROPO~;EDUSE: SURROlJNDINGZONING: PtF (Public Facilities) 3.92 acres Religious Facility (Liberty Baptist Church) with associated educational services (Grades K - 5). AR-l (Agricultural, Residential- Idu/acre) to the north and east" and J (Institutional) to the south and west. SURRO£JNDING LAND USES: ' FIREIEM;SPROTECTION: The existing uses to the north and east are primarily residential uses with institutional uses to the south and. west. The·Puture Land Use Classification to. the north, east and west is RS (Resi4ential Suburban) and to the south iSPIF(Public Facilities). To the north and east are single-family residential units. To the west is additional property owned by Liberty Baptist Church was has an I (Institutional) zoning designation and is not included in thisl'etition. To the south of the subject property is· the Hospice of the Treasure Coast Facility. Station #6 (3$0 E. Midway Road) is located approximately 3 miles to the east. August 7,2001 Page 2 Petition: Liberty BaptistChurch File No.: CD-COl-OOS UTILI1~Y SERVICE: Ft.PierceUtility Authority will provide water ·to the ·subject property. Onsite sewer will be provided through a' septic . system. TRANSPORTATION'IMPACTS :RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for Midway Road is 95 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None TYPE O~F . CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT R~QUIRED: Concurrency <Capacity Deferral. STANDARDSQF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST.·LUCIECOUNTY LAND <DEVELOPMENT CODE InmvieWing. this appliêa.tion for propo$edconditional us~, the Planning and Zoning Conunission shall consider and.ma.kethe followingd.etenninations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie (;ountyLandDevelopmentCode; The proposedcönditional use is not in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.0L()3(X)(7), I (Institutiofial) ZoningDistrict, allows educational services and facilities as a. conditional use, subject to County Commission a.pproval. The proposed educational facilities are to be operated within the existing. Liberty Baptist Church facility. The approved sitepmnfér the Liberty Baptist Church was a.pprovedon Febmary 29, 1996. This plan indicates thea.pproval of 20,974scquare feetin building space (9,274 square feet'"'" religious facility and 11,700 square feet Îfi gymnasium·space). Any expansion of this space for~dncatiònal purpQses would require a modifica.tion to the· site plan and conditional use permit Based upon this, the proposedconditiùfi~ use permit is notÎficonflict with any applicable portion· of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nE~arbyproperties; The proposed conditionaluseis not expected to adverselyimpact the surrounding properties. Liberty Baptist Church is requesting a COfiditional Use Permit to operate educational services·a$ an accessory use to thereIig'ious facility. The property directly south of the subject property, the Hospice of the Treasure Coast, is designated with a P/F (Public Facilities) land use designation and I (Institutional) zoning. The vacant property to the westöf the subjeèt parcel is designated with' an RS. (Residential Suburban) land use designatiònand I (Institutional) zoning. Thi$ property is owned by Liberty Baptist Church and has been designated as future growth area. Therefore, 'the proposed coñditional use is August. 7, 2001 Page 3 Petition: ..Liberty Baptist Church File No.:CU-Ol-005 compatible with nearby properties and would not have an adverse impact on the suÌTounding properties. 3. Whether and . the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities.and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer ,drainage .structures,. parks, and mass transit;; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additionaldem~ds on ~y public facilities in this area. Tùe applicant is proposing educational service at this timefor grades K - 5. In order for any additional grades to be . · added to the existing· conditional use a· modification· will. be required with Board of Co un t;y ComfiÛssioner Approval. Upon development of the property west of Dunn Road, the facility will also be required to modify the Conditional Use Pennit to allow the use of the property as c~ducational services. ' 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant udverseimpacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditionaluseis fiotanticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The proposed facility is existing. The religious facility would like to increase the services provided to the.public·by holdingeducational.services for·grades K- 5. COMM]~NTS The applicant, Liberty Baptist Church, has applied for the requested conditional use in order to offer educational services as an accessory use to the religious facility. The subject property is a 3.92.acre tract of land located at thefiortheast comer of Midway :Road and DUl}.n Road in the I (Institutional) Zoning Distt1ct. Educátional Service!; and Facilitiesa.re allowed as conditional uses in the I (Institutional) ZoningDistrict upon approval of the Bo::œd of County Commissioners. Staff finds that this petition meets the stafidards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in ·conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of ~e St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recoO;1mends that you forward this petition to the Board of County CoInIDÌssioners with a recommendation of approval with the following conditions: 1. This permit is to allow eduçationlll services for Grades K - 5 only. Any additional educational services will require arno~ification to the Proposed Conditional Use Permit. 2. The approved Conditional Use Pennit is for the proposed 3.92-acre parcel of land only. Upon development of the property, west of DUDn Road, owned by the Liberty Baptist Church, an additional ConditioßalUse Permit will be required tooperate,eclucational services. 3. Anyex¡t!ansioß tQthe square footag¢ for the Liberty Baptist Church facility that will he used for educational purposeS wìlI tesult in a modification to the existing site plan and the proposed conditional use permit. Please·contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment cs Cc:Pastor Cooley, Liberty Baptist Church Suggested motion to recommend approvalldenialof this requested condìtional use. MOTI()NTOAPPROVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11 ;07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENTCODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE APPUCATION OF LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH, FOR ACONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW EDUCATIONAL SERVICES AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO A RELIGIOUS FACILlTYIN THE I (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONIN<3 DISTRICT: BECAUSE..,. [CITE REASON(S) WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC] MOTIOI\lTO DENY:" AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMME:NTS,AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, sr. LUCIE COUNTY LANDDE:VELOPMENTCCDE, I HERE:SY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONRE:COMMEND THAT THE ST. LUOIECOUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOWEDUCA TIONAL SERVIC~S AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO ARELlGIOUSFACILTY IN THE I (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT: BECAUSE... [CITEREA$ON(S)WHY-PLEASEBE SPECI'FIC] (' 0) :: ,J" .. ... ,'" ,) Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regufations x. L INSTITUTIONAL 1 . Purpose Thé pwrpose of this district is to provide and protect and environment suitable for institutional, public, and quasi~pl1blicuses.together with such othér uses as may be compatible with institutional, public, and quasi~pubic surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified usecorresþonds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined undertheS1Caode but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code.. 2. Permitted. Uses a. Community residential homes subject to the provisions of Section 7.10.07.. (999) b.. Family day care homes.. (999) c. Family residemtial homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feefof another exiSting such family fésidentialhome and provided that the ~pons()fingagency or the Department of Héalth and Rehê'1bilitative Services (HRS) notifJe$ the Board of County Commissioners at the time of homeoccupallCY that thé home is·.Ucensed··by .HRS. .(999) d. Institutiona' rè$identialhomes. (999) e. Parks.· (999) f. Police & fire protection (9221.9224) g. RecreaUonaFactivities. (999) h.. Religiot:Js;organlzations (666) 3.. Lot Size Requirements 4. [)imenslonal Regulations , Lot size requireméntsshaU be in aCQordance with Section 7.04.00. [);rnensionalrequirements shall be ¡naccordance with Section 7..04..00. 5.. ()ff-streetParkingahd"Loading Requirements ()ff..-streetparkingandfoading requirements are subject to Section? ..06.00. . 6.. Landscaping Requirements 7. ConditionaJUses landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09..00. 8. ó. c. d.. e. 1. g. AmphItneaters. (999) Cemeteries. (6553) Membership organizations (66) Correctional.instituUons .(9223) Culturaladtivities and nature exhibitions. (999) Educational. services ·andfacilities (62) Executive I legislative ,and judiciaffunctions.(91.92.Ø3,94,9S,96.97) " Adopted August 1. 1990 132 Revised Through 08/01/00 ',J .,:...), " .' ,. . ~~:~.~ ,,' " Section .3.01.03 Zoning .District Use Regulations h. L j. k. I. m. n.. o. p~ q. r"; ..... . . Fairgrounds.(999) Funerafand crematory servìces.(726) Theaters., (999) Medicafand. other heaJthservices. (80) Postal seryice. (43) Re$identî81 carefaciJitiesfor seriousorhabituaJ.juvenileoffenders. (999). Sooial services (83) Sp()rting'ånd recreational camps (7032) Stadiums. arenas, racetracks (194) Telecommuriication towers - sUbJect to the standards. of Section 7.10.23 (999) 8. Access()tyUses Accessory usesaresubJectto the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the.following: 8. b~ c. d. e. [ Adopted August t, 1990 Drinking places (a¢Qholic'beVer'ag(i}s.related tociYic. social. and frafemaluses), (9Ø$) RestàtJrant$. (lhcludingthe. sale ofalcohoUcbeYerages for on-premises· conStJmptionol1ly.) (999) . Funera'ªndcrem~tory serVices. (726) Hefiporllandingltakeoffpads.(999) De~achèdsjI19Iè-fåfuJYdwèllingunit or mobile home. for on-site security purposes. (999) Residence .haUsordormitories. (999) ( It. ( 133 Revised Through 08/01/00 ~ \ OKEECHOBEE COUNlY T ,36'S T 35 S T 34 S / ::v :0 ¡ till ~ W .... .... PI ~ PI .. < ", . C"~3 Z ~ (-,.. 0 :I 5> Z SNtEO ROAD ~ ;II .. tA ~ !: CD . ... .. PI 1"'1 < ~ î -I :JJ ! ~ :JJ .- 0 0 C Z ~ ;V ~ s:; -i Z :v ~ '" (") o c: z :< o e ;~,'.,,',',:':,,' ~~~ :~ ¡~ ", ~..":~",. ' ;,(m,,~· ,', ~..,f; , ~,":':' 'J::' ~ ~, "~~,: 1, t~ "',J A~~' : tí ~ o --L I o o U1 \ \. ., o c:: Ie: ., .., .., ., · .., · ., · Co ... C .:¡ N .."" N, () 2 o ., o » ~ I Õ " (') ~ f'I ". z' ~ a r: 0- CD ., r-t- '< OJ Q) -0 ...-+ (J'J .......-t- '. o· ::J._. C ~ o ::J A, .. Pßti~iQn .øf/Ljt?~rtyBapti$tChurch for· aCönditionall.J$8 Perrnitto allow .educatio.nafservices. ' ~û' ~~ @1J ~® @~ Conol West Midway Road No. 103 1J@~ 1J@1J . CU 01---005 V//¿j This pâttern \indicátes.' subject parcel t;~::';<:<'~;:';~/l This pélttern".indlcafes City otPört St. Lucie 11@@ -0 o o a:::: c: CD (I) C 4J ~ .c U ST4~~~~ Map prepared July 27. 2001 Thiemap ha$ bøen ~Ied for gør1eI'aI~. and ·f~ØfGl1co purpoeee only. N. WhHe every etfQt1 hås bøeo~to Pf<Mdø the t'no$tCOfrentand 8OCU(stø iofocmation possible, it 18· .~ inteoded .fOi' usø 88. 1egaIy. bindinQ· do<:u-nent. Land Use Liberty Bapti stCh u rch -~~~._~~~~~~~~~~~-~ ~..~ .~õ' RS ~® ~'~~.~'~~~'~,~~~~~~,~~~~ eJ1J "0 o o '0:: W)$ c OJ (I) C OJ .~ .c () OM C0(-101 West Midway Road No. 103 1l®~ PIF 1)@1) lIH R RS CU 01-005 V77z1 This pattern indicates subject parcel I:~::';:/~<:<:/I This pattern indicates City of Port St. Lucie ... .~,.. $¥4~~~~ ,Map prepared July 27.2001 Thi$ map ha$ been ~ for general planning and,~fereoœ purpo$e$ oriy. N WhIle eYOI'y effoIt haå been ITI$dè to prO\/ide thE! most ctKfel'lt and· accurate infonnation ~.It is oo(iotended for U~ .. 8.$ a legaily bioding documeot. . . Zoning liberty Baptist Church AR-1 ~~ ~® ~.i$ .........' ~............... ........'....."~, ........,.....~,......,........ ~ @1J 'U o o £t: I @$ c cv (I) ¡c . cv ~ .s:::. () CN Canal West Mid w.ay Rood No. 103 1J@~ 1) @1J . ~ (f) l' CU 01~005 V77/1Thì$Þattern indicates 'Subject parcel I; /~':~::'~<:«::l This pattern Indicates City of Port St. Lucie ·~~("~"'~~d~· ! Map · prepared July 27, 2001 -- ~ ThIs map hafJ been ~ for general planning . and reference purposes only. N.J; ~~e:':~~~~~O:::'a~~:: =t liberty Baptist . Church ~~-~-~-~~'~--~~~-~~ f-··········--- · .-.-....-.-~-----------------.--..-.. ---.--~-----..-.: · I i 0.49 0.48 i ~(f§ : ~~ I $3.~ : I · · I I · I I I .--.-.-----.., · I · · ...;.....,........ ......;... ,.........,..........I~ ,___ ....-.,~ ....... .......,'~ ........ ......... '~'........... 7.38 acres 3.28 acres 8.75 acres . c Go) (J) è: QJ û) .¡: .J:: (,) @1J 2.89 · I · · · · · · · · · · · · 2.88 .12: · @$ ." "C o o a:: I · I I, I I I I I · · . I · I t I I Conal West Midway Road No. 103 . ¡ 0,72 ¡ ! 3.07 acres 3.24 acres cres 1.04 acres! ....~ ~ms 0.18/ i 11@11 0.50 ; :". ·11@~ .., . ..¡ ... . acres: 1]@@ . -----..-..........-....-. .. .-.-....-....----..-.-.-.- ~--- ....--...-....-.....: .............................----.........................-.......-_~ :, ".'.. ... CU 01-()05 ---------..·500· boundary V7/~ This pattern indicatés subject parcel V/';~«<':/ This pattern indicates City of Port 81. Lucie ~~ . .··.';j:i>,;,~~'~~. Map prepared July 27.2001 f - ~ N This map . ha$ been. compiled for genGl'aI f)Ianning . and refereooe purposes only. While every effort has beer¡ mackHo prQ'lo'ide 1he most CUltønt and accurate informationposaibfe, it Ie nb«lntended for use at . .~ binding document. ljÞertyBaptistChurch CU 017"O(}5 l?.;rj?'~tJf This pattern indicðtfessubjecf parcel f¡:: :';' ; ":t;'; :::'U }:J "fh is pattern . i ndicatesGity Qf Port· St. Lucie ~g~J~~~ Map prepared July 27, 2001 This. map has boon compiled lOt ~alpannjog. ~·(efß(ence ·purposes·ooly. N....... . ::~~::~~~~·.~~.::.a~~~::=. AGENDA · PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, AUGUST 16, 2001 7:00 P.M. LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH, INo. QF FORT PIERCE, has petitioned St. Lucie County fora Conditional Use Permit to allow educationatservices in the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the jòllowing described property: Location: 3660. West Midway Road (Northeast corner of the intersection' of West Mìdway and Dunn Roads) Please note that all praceedings before the Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Local Planning Agency with respect loany matter c{)nsidered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and ti:tat, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will he granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing . will also be considered. Prior tQ this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners August 1, 2001. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of gene ral circulation in St. Lucie County, on August 6, 2001. File No. CU-01-00S BOARD·· OF COUNT'{ COMMISSIONERS COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT DIRECTOR August ·1, 2001 In accordance witb tb~ St Lucie County Land Development Code, you are bereby advised tbat liberty BaptiSt Church, Inc. of Fort Pierce bas petitioned St. Lucìe County for a· Conditìonal Use pennit to allow educational services in tbe I(fustitutional) Zoning District . (Location: 3660 West Midway Road (Northeast cornel." of Midway & Dunn Roads) THEI»ROPERTY'SLEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST Tbefirst public hearing on the petition wül be held at 7:00P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on Thursday, Aug~t .16,2001, County Commissioner's ChamTJers, St.Lucie .·County Administration lJuiIiling) 2BO(J·V'U'ginia.Avettue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All intereSted.persons will· be given an opportunity to be heard atthattiI1le.. Writteficomments.received in advance of the public bearing will also be considered. Writteficommß1tt8 to the Planning and ZoPing Connnission should be reeeivedby tbe County Plaiming Divi$ioIl atleast3dåys prior to å scheduled hearing. County policy discourages. conununicatìon with individual Planning and ZOPing Connnission and County ConunissioIlonany éâse outsid~ of th~ . scheduled public hearing(s ). You may speak at a public hearing, or providevn'Ítten comments· for the record. The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides.to apP¢a1 any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter cOl1$idered at such nìeeting OJ; hearitIg, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatÌfilrecord ofth~ proceedings i~ made, which record includes the testiïnony and evidence upon which the, appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to· the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the pr~g will begnWtedan opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon ttequest. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may:· be continued to a d.ate~certåin. Anyone with: a disability requiring acconunodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County CQmmunity Services DirectoJ; at least forty~ight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (561) 462- 1777orT.D.D·f5(1) 462..1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notìce to the new owner, Please call 5611462-1582· if yöu have any questì{)ns, and refer to: File Number CU-Ol-OOS. Sincerely, ST~ LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION :!~/?>laJ JOHN D. GRUHN. District NO.1. DOUG COWARD. District No.2· PAULA A. LEWIS. District No.,J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON. District No. 4 . CUFF GARNES. District.No. 5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 \Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, Fl34982-5652 Administration: (561) 462-1590 · Planning: (561) 462-2822 · GfSfTechnical Services: (561) 462-1553 Economic Development: (561)462~1550 . Fox: (561)462-1581 Tourist/Convention: (561) 462...1529 · Fax: (561) 462-2132 II I ,....~ j¡ ~: \õ i~ 1 00 ¡ 0\ ; g ~'. .. 8 ~ g' ~ ~ -q. ~ (':, ~ . . . oo,~ ~ '1 ;¿:> Ñ 'M~~~~~«J' , S.!. ~ ~ ~ ('f') ~ ('f') ~ .. ~ ("f) ('f) ("f) ('f') ("'f) :N~'N¡ ('f')(1')('f') 000 V) V) V) f . . ,...., ....... Y-4 000000 0\0\0\ ~. ~ ~ ('f') '. ("'f) ('f) ; ~¡ ~ ......c í Q\j - í ('f) \0 V') fG N <:> 0 0\ ~ 0\ 0 00 \0 V) ~ N ~ '0 0\ . . . ~ . . <:> ~ ~ ....... Y-4 ~ 0\ 00 00 ('f) öO 00 ('f1 0\ ~ 0\ \0 0\ ~ "I:t ~ ~ ('f) ("f) ("f) ("t) ('f') i ¡ ¡ ! I f t ¡ i i ;01 f 00 \0 \0 <:) . ~ ("f) V) Y-4 "¢ Ii 3,1 'I I ---! -, r 1--,- :>< U .r,..· . 1,i.; -11. -J. :.. -J I' -1. : -1 ¡ ..-1. I ~ I,'.' ¡ ~ i, -J'li -1 i i ; ~ i, -1. . '. -1, ¡..oJ: ~ j....;1 r W ¡......¡e I I' 'I.l ¡; u., u., u. , u., u. rU. i u., +¥1~--+~~+~¡~j-~I~+~ !,:~,..:---.~¡I!,'-.-"--'·'.¡-.~_~',! -. ~_-...l(,.g~,~,!, -...~_-:¡I--'I;~.·. :".'. - I ~ I ~ I~! ¡ :~ ¡ .21 ~ I~ !.~ I ~! ~j I¡ ~ ~ I ...,..c! ~ j ._) .....; U' ._' ~ I -J: ._ ¡..... ~ I, Ii ¡;;....!; ~¡ ~!~I ~/ ~I ~¡~¡ ¡ ~!J.J.c¡ ~¡ ; ~¡. ! ~¡ ~¡...,¡~i~ .11 r: ,..... I ¡ ~; t: t:: .¡ t ¡ t I éij j t \ '.',.' 1::. !,: t..· ,II t::. 1,1... ! t" ',:. ", S. .r" t:: ¡ t '1, . .. c: :,: 1:::. .:". 1:: J¿. . , l:ö¡¡~¡æl&læ¡æl~'&¡ 000 o~ 0 0 æ 0 o~ I¡! --Ii ¡H¡ r .! .. T -. j, .. J ~ I ~J þ., ! ! þ., ip:< I tI.. L~I !:I) j u..¡u..h~ II ,. ¡! ~i : : ! I /1 Ii ¡ ; ~;Êi II 111I 1~~I~~!~ir: i~i~r~¡ : 'i¡j~!~~!~~,JI ¡I! . f¡'.i ,f.()... I,'.' ~..-.··..~I ~. ~ '. <'I'" i ~.' '..' ···i..g..·.i. 1,:" p:. ·.r.. P:..... í ....c:. I:.' 'is. i 0. i." 9. '. ~ IN I ~¡.' .~ \Of'l ì ¡ \0 I ~! ,.......( J ~ 1'-41 Õ· ~ ! ,~~ t:::; ~ ¡ , ..,....:~ .' _. ~ ¡ N ¡ ~! t::\O. 11 ...... 1¡><f'~1 ;.<~ I><I~ Jt>i ¡~ jft¿ i;¿ ¡ ¡ :.:>.?Ø,: ~ " ;¿ ,¡~ I,' ><0 II:. ~ I.;¿ ><0" 'II 11 Q)jO ç.! 0 ç. J 01"7! ~ ¡ ¡ ~...q~ ¡ J-4 ¡! "';1 ~ ~ ;;> ~ i; Q) .(J Q4! 0 ¡ aQ 'I").! t::Q ! ,~;, 00: ¡ ~ ! ~ i~ ¡ 1 , i ('-. i 0;0 ; t:Q ; ~¡ 0 t:Q t lib 101;';10 ~loi81~1 ¡:i6j~I~! ¡ :;giÑI~i~:~¡~I~ @ : rrrl~iI~¡--'¡:J:+:tl-¡-~t~r~-~I-'lì: Q) 11 1 .1 ..t> .1 I.' I ..1 ¡ c;S1. .,c;S...I,cû.1 Iii II::) I I, c;S cs. , I .P"! I· QI ¡ ¡ ~i "0, "OJ I ' 1 I,' .ª..... ./ ¡If.s ~ I ¡I.. '.~ ...... I .t:: s:: IS:: 1.1 1 " ~ ' Ie j ~ ¡ ì ! ~:~,~,! ,:.. ì ¡ GJ l~~ I·..-I....r--I·~·-- r:I-'''r . t;l;t:r'-I' I .. r . j ~:--j--!~~ I ~ ¡ , ! ¡ ~! ï-¡ : ! e! E ¡ ê' i !J--j_i'¡"'-~~'I~D,!!,: 1:,1,'._ j f~ltt-r:tTI-I-- -1-º-,/·º~12!--I---i ! .~ IIIå·I~~ I·~ ~j ~ I~~I~ :~ I~ ¡ t 11~~T~i-~---jj-l-J~t~l J~L~..¡i ¡.Qj ;-i¥!t I:/) ¡ 'I ' 1 í : i , I s II /1 I!. "', . -0' I I II I III II i :!,',iuj,I:I. ~! ."', ~! ~ ~ I II Q I, ,I i ~ i .... ~... g! :E; "'1 i II ~ 'I Ij ! U'J ¡ :;> i ,~, g I _ i "'0 .Q ¡ 1 Ii Þ-( I II ¡ i] i i Ø) ;; Cd i .9 ¡ .J:: ¡ t:: ¡ ~! Ii '-I.J: I II : ! U 1 d: I '" ~ ¡ GJ' !'.) I æ! Ì"'oI I II i. ~ ./1 ¡I/ i ¡ ~ I I ð I ; ¡ i; ~! ~ i ~ i ª ¡.! I I ¡ill ~ð , 1 ¡ i~1 ¡ëJ! : I I ! !; tio¡;¡; Q;õ¡~¡ I r~:ø /1 ~II ml~~IJ ~ /8! ¡~:~I~! i~i·~¡ ~~ @I~~I'~II \wi ~ Ii _0( P s! c ¡ $.it ~ ¡ ..t:: I U'J! c! ; ~' ~! ~! ø.; E' ~ ¡ (1) .M: ~: ß .~ I · cø ¡f ~f I :s I e I iš, ~! ~ I ~! ~ ¡ EL e ¡ 2! : t5 lB ¡ . c: .c ~ :E: -e .J:: I: -= = lL~~~II-~l-~J~I-~k~~ºj -. J .QLº-I º! --.. : ~:. ~ ¡ ~ ; ~ ¡ -::J! -~J-~. ~II! Q) ~ ill II ~I ~I -,:t ~¡ Nt 001~! : ('I; f.()¡ ro¡ t": Q\' 0\; r-: ('t'). \Of ("f)l N r- ¡ S 1:: I ~'IIN ~,~ o¡~ltQ ~¡ !~:!Q!~¡Ni ~:~:~;gi@I'g:~ ~I §" ~ 'I ~,!:; ~ldl~i~i~I~1 !~i~I~I~¡ ~!5!5!~:~i:::!~ d 'Uc ~ "~ II : ; I ("'f) I ¡ : ('I; i 0; 0 ¡ ; 00 ; ',' rr>: . I _ ;>. I Q II I I ¡ I ¡ :; I', -: I ': 1; ~ cS I ~ ¡¡I i /1 ¡ l¡ : i j ~ i ; i : ¡ 1 il·~a~ g l' -f¡t-¡ s ~~ ~-~/'-'~i~r~'~r-~ . ¡-§jr~r§"I¡'~t&I~1 ª ~ ',. ('f') 00 00 00 I \0 rn 00 i M ¡ 00 ~ r-I I'~ t" 0 0\ I 0 <:> \0 0\ !: = ~ .....: ~ N "1 ~r('f) ~ oç/ i~!~ ~ ,..¿./ ~I~I....: r--:1~ ~ ~ t' I; e <9 1 Š, ~I I ~¡ 2/ ~l '¢, <"I! I;!;I 0' "'I' ('I, I t'/-I I MI' ~ N ~ ~ i! S;J '"a II ¡ I I ¡ : f ~ ; ! ; ! :' 0 U r \ I I , I , ¡ ¡ ¡ : ¡ ! ¡ : I Î : ! ¡ ;: U ......., ¡ j I ¡ : 1 :': I : ì ¡ : ¡'I ¡¡ c...., a i/- -. -'lf~ VI tf<'¡ ¡if)-¡'\õl 0: Nip j-('.1¡·iC¡-~r- pi' ~io; i ¡;¿¡ I \Oìot _ ¡ r-- VI ,: 0 ~ ¡ 18!'8;~8¡8IgI8: 8:8/81 : tgOi8!8:8:8,g!g 8 ';.......... I r, <::> ' 0 I <::> I 0 J 0 I 0 I r-: 0 I 0 0 ! ; 0 i rr> ¡ ,..... ¡ 0 I \0 I ('I 0 , :' == ~ ¡ ~ ( \0 I t.f) 0\ ¡ ("f) ¡ \t') \0: i 00 i 00 I: 0 I ' """ I N I \0: \0 ..- ¡ \0 I \0 0 ' Q) ~ 1/ :!~ ~ ~ ::t¡~I~~¡ :~i~~! ¡ ~~~I~~¡~i~j'~~! ' S J-.II I :tt:/¡o¡o¡a,¡oJo 0 o¡ 'oiolol ¡ 0:01010100,0 O~ :1 ill ~ ji~I!~I!~I~¡¡~1~ ~¡ i~I:~ ~IIO¡;¡li ;~I~i~I!~li~jl~l~ ~ <! Q, ~ I c<; v v v v v v vi IV¡V v Õ Iv!v v '<It '<It '<It '<It '¢ !i£,o~~~ ~-.,~..·.-~,-,,~~~-c~ -.:~L~~."<;;.~~-!:", ¡ .<;. ,~-J::' 1__1 ":'J M.I. '::.:~l~_=~~ ':-. '.' ...... . PARCEL 2: I " :'.::: ::....~.;:,.....:. ::..~~~;;.:,~~h;'~;:;)~.>·! . From the. northwest corner. , . ..:,í7·,··~.f'/~&~1lf~i~~ti;;~·\h:~t . Fof~,iotJ~2, Wh;te"GI~{Sûb~' ::';'; '~~~;~i'~~6~i': ." : . 'I~J': '¡~'~ì¥,ò,,~ :ocç9~~~n,tr~;\,tó'~)ljè::: '" .: :\·:,:·~<~~Q\NN·,.ÙG;~~'~('¡' . t·.. .··}P'9tthêreof~(~~99(ded.~.;,n· . . ,ZONfN~:'~CÔ~~,' .,"~ ,.: ." ,Plqt QO(jk ¡ 1, . p(Jg~rg;r,:::of '.," PUBLlt HIËÄRt'í\.r I':~?¡~~"~'!'~ . . the· ¡ PubUcRecords "'of . St. r·" ". .' . AGENDA'. - . luc;ie ,County, Florida;, run August '16,\2001'~I...~,:~·':t~:i . th.~nc~.~ast, 15f~et;.,fhenc~. · '." ,. .' south, . parcHer whh the fa WHOM I TM A' Y . wesf lot I;ne,409' feet for CONCERN: the point 'of b~gJnning;. thence run' east, 220. feet; thence south, parallel,' with said west lot line, 211.70 ,f~et, to the north' right-of.., ' way, line. of Midwoy 'Roa~{ , thence . west; along said north right-of-W9Y lin~/' . 220,feef, more or less, to -the' east, right-of-way. of .Dunn.. ·Road¡thenœ'norfh ..9n.. säid":eOst . right-óf~wa; : ,line~ '209.26 feet~ ',' more or .'. )·fe~,s,·,to .the ·point ·pf.·begin..:·· . . riing;'\ .Iess to ~oaçl·' right~of~ '.' 'wt;Jy 'Qs,ln ·Offiëial Records' ·f;.Bo~k ·.~·23$; . Page ·..8·13, òf . the ·Poþ1ic·~Records· 'of ~·Sf.. .. ~UCi~..~~tJ~ty~ ,.fl<~r!~~..· " (óÒ:lti~~;";3~60 .. We~~:Mid- '~ay . 'Rpòd'{Northeaslcor- ....ñ~r ..~f·Mi~wò·y .,& . Dûnn: "~~a'ds) ,', ','; ~'. .. the nø.tH'i.tåst 'c~rn~;'~; 6i · 'PUI3Ç/C~..f EAIÚNGS}, ~i'be lot' 92, WhJtfiCitY .SubdtVi~·· "': ~~ '·;~è".~··jò ·.CÓ~Ò1is·siC),~. ;Ch"m~ . ···sion~'acc<?rçJing to':"~h~:'p'~t' ~: ,,;.:::bø~s~ ¡~;~~er:~~oJtraf.~:~e~í'· '., ',therèqfo$:':rec(jrdecf<¡(¡:' ,Pial' <.....'. ·.·.~~;30Q,..Virg;rdaAvenûë,Forf . ., ," , .... , ~~~I~ê' k~~~t~~;~t~~:', ::.::::: ::',~tê~p~l~r~d~g¡~~~~g~:: :;:: ;': : ~:: ;',:,::: :~.~: ~: :,::;:' >~: 7';',:- ::":;::¿:; qounty;. F'fcirida;·/Ù'{Jh~n·¢e,.·· , ·,.:7:99·:P:M. ,~r9~.,·.soo~·there·~.. . eQst <a,lon$lJh~e nOr.th \(ihe., of:~ ! ~~ff~r ~.$ possi~(~. said. .lot>."235~. feet'- .fot:> the, ,.:...' . .. ." fJPi,t1fof ,f>~tnßingi:;th~hd~:' " ::pu RSUA Nt .'T 0' $ ectiò n cotin~ue' ':èOst ,"'2.:1"0' :··::f.èet.·r·::~8·6.g1 05~, ,fJ9r¡dét.~.fatutesi· , Thence S6ufry" Mì'ctllel 'iVit~i . -¡f,d':'" Þersdr¡(deddesto . . t"'e~: west· Jot.fioeJ) ::623~02: . appe~~ ~ny .:~~~¡s;O!1 'made , . fee~;: :rno'r.e··::~ ~r. :~es~f:~': :*q,~~,t~.e~:. " -f :, ,b}':. .:',~.~, '~o.~r~ì ~' ag~ßçy,. : òr . n°rf~,.:.r.i~J'Jt.~of~y{qy···:linè· øf;' '€ô,:"m.fs.s.'Öh with respect to 'N1idWây RqQd;)hèrice\~le~e' : øn.ÿ:.ptatter eonsidered at a . '.' ~1-0 f~ef;Th~nce nort~ þar~'i' . .rrieetf,ôg :ò': hèår;hg~ hew;fI .' aHel ~'¡th .fþe 'rest lot; U~'e;' .. .·~~~ep· (J':; rec'ord.. of . fhe' pro- . 62:O¡7Q,:;·fe~.t, >,mpre· Qr >\I~š$:~. :\,ç~etfi:~g.s,·â.r:idthøti'.f9r sµêh t~ the poJ9t::.o~ be.g~0'1~~9i.:' :~~urp~)$7·s~.. h~:·'n:aay·:n.Ø~d tQ les~ . ~o'~oad r.ight~of;\,Va;y.: ;:J;n~s,:u:è .;' that ....'0':. :vêrbatlm 0$ ,n,·Offici,aJ. R~corQsJ39ok ·.:¡~ecor~r .6fo/th~.:··p~ocßeqtngs· 2~~,,:Page t8 r3~ of the' P(.b~ :lsm.ad.e,.' ·.w·hich·'í,·record lic, . R,ª~ord~ .>of.· 'St. :f Lucie· ihÇJ~~~$; the.:}e$t;~10nY' ønd C<¡)~n.ty~!~,pr/d(i' '... ,':..evidénc~ ,oÞQn ~Þlç~' the . ,., ,; ¡9Þ~a(J,~ ::st~: .~~ ,~~:.t.: ,:~ " . ; ~~ANNING, AND :ZONÎNG·. . ;:.; COMM'lSSfON '::-:?(;'~:~~;:'.: '. . ST~.lUCf E' COU NT-V:~ :"':';.>:: \ ,':FLOR'IDA . '::'.' ,·~..:/·... '.: '/~I ~tefan' Matthes; '::':'. '; I. . .CHAIRMAN '. . . . , , .. . . . . . , . , . . . . . ~ . . . . ; .: :.:' , : :. ,-: .: . f .. .- I .~ f '.. NOTICE ·is.herel:?y· g¡v~n . in accorda'nce with Section 11 .00.03 'of'thè .·St. Lucie '. County' land, ,Deve.lop·mênt Code and the provisions of! ,the . St. ..lucieCounty.,.Com_i prehensive . ~'an,t~efoUQw-1 , ng'oppUcantshave requested' ,that' the. St;· lucie" .» County Pldnningancf Z~n.. ;ng' Commission, consider , theirfon?~ing.r-~q~e$t: . . 'I ...... t'. . tib$rty . 8~pii~t C;hur~h, inc.: or Fort . .Pierce I ,for' q'..' :Cøndt... ,tionatUse.·.permif :fo: :álJôw. eduèafiot;aóJ ':šerViè:ès ·inthe , (Institutio~dllZoning 'District' for the ·following .d~scri.bèd· . p~oþe.rty:.. . .' ;"''':' . . . legal O'è~êrìpti6rk . . . .. ~ .. ~ . . 4 ". ... .. .. ..... . , '. . . . .o" . . . . . . . ,. '::3\::;~<~';~'~( '~;"17~ ~~bl:i~·~~:~~9~~(·6/. '2:aäl.~ ' ,'. ;::" ;:1:" :0":. :'f/" ",~~~47fO' :' :.';: ~;~ ~.::.::,;'~;::',:: ~.~~.~: ;~..~ :~;; :'~:: ~.~~.~: ~ :~: ; ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ St. Lucie County Planniug.andZonihg ComndssionILocal Planning A.gency Regular Meeting Commission Chambers,3td FloorRQger Poitras Annex August 16,' 2001 7:00P.M. AGENDA CALL 1ro ORDER: A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call C. Announcements D. Disclosures AGENDA ITEM 1: MEETING MINUTES -~Tune 21, 2001 Actîon Recommended:· Approval Exhibit#1: Minutes of June 21, 2001, meeting AGENDA ITEM 2: MEETING MINUTES - .Tulv 26, 2001 Action Recommended: Approval Exhibit #2: Minutes of July 26,2001, meeting AGEND.A ITEM 3: FILE NO. CU- 01-005 Petition of LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. OF FORT PIERCE, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow educational services in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. Staff comments by Cyndi Snay. Action Recommended: Forward Recommendation to County Commission Exhibit #3: Staff Report, Síte Plan, and Site Location Maps OTHER BUSINESS: A. Other· business at Commission Members' discretion. B. Next regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting will be held on September 20, 2001, in CommissionChambers~atthe Roger Poitras Annex Building. AD.TOUl NOTIC County Zoninf will n proce requ prof An' Cú 4( A lommissionILocal Planning Agency of St.·Lucie 4es to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he ~ose, he may need to insure that a verbatim record of the bd evidence upon which the appeal is based. Upon the hg during a hearing will be sworn in. . Any party to the ,e any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. hd this meeting shouldco11.tact the S1. Lucie County tiTS prior to the meeting at (561) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (561) ç lhe St. Lucie County Planning Division at (561) 462-1586. " ----~.------~ - -----------._-