The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRTO Board Agenda Packet October 20 20111 Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Regional Transit Organization Board Meeting Date: October 20, 2011 Time: 2:00 P.M. Location: Port St. Lucie City Council Chambers 121 SW Port St. Lucie Boulevard Port St. Lucie, Florida AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Approval of Meeting Summary a. August 18, 2011 -See attached Meeting Summary 6. Comments from the Public 7. Comments from Transit Technical Advisory Committee 8. Action Items a. Draft RTO By-Laws See Agenda Item Summary and Attachments (#8a) ? Draft TCRTO By-Laws Action: Approve, approve subject to change, or do not approve ersistentHandler 2 Action Items Continued b. Draft US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan See Agenda Item Summary and Attachments (#8b) ? PowerPoint slide presentation ? Project Description/Scope of Work ? Draft US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan report Action: Approve, approve with conditions, or do not approve c. Adopt Proposed RTO Board meeting dates See Agenda Item Summary and Attachments (#8c) ? Meeting date schedule Action: Approve, approve with conditions, or do not approve 9. Follow up Action Items from August 18, 2011 RTO Board Meeting See Agenda Item Summary and Attachments (#9) ? List of contact information for similar Florida RTA Boards ? Copy of the FDOT Contract/Task Order with Consultants No action required 10. FDOT Comments 11. Member Comments 12. Staff Comments 13. Next Meeting December 15, 2011 (Martin County) 14. Adjourn 1 Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization (RTO) Board Meeting Meeting Summary Thursday, August 18, 2011 Martin County Administration Building Commission Chambers – 1st Floor 2401 SE Monterey Road Stuart, Florida 34997 CALL TO ORDER – 2:00 P.M. Meeting Attendees Members in Attendance: Commissioner Doug Smith, Martin County BoCC Commissioner Paula Lewis, St. Lucie County BoCC Commissioner Eula Clarke, Alternate, Commissioner Michael Mortell, City of Stuart Councilman Jack Kelly, City of Port St. Lucie Commissioner Edward Becht, Alternate, Commissioner Reginald Sessions, City of Fort Pierce Mayor Jacqui Thurlow-Lippisch, Alternate, Commissioner Tom Bausch, Town of Sewell’s Point Joe Capra, Economic Development Council of Martin County, Inc. H.M. Ridgely, Economic Development Council of St. Lucie County, Inc. RTO Staff (MPO/TPO) in Attendance: Peter Buchwald, St. Lucie TPO Executive Director Beth Beltran, Martin MPO Administrator Claudette Mahan, Martin MPO Associate Planner Margaret Brassard, Martin MPO Others in Attendance: Larry Merritt, FDOT District 4 Arlene Tanis, FDOT District 4 Jaclyn Meli, FDOT District 4 Kim Delaney, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (RPC) Kim Graham, City of Port St. Lucie Joseph Quinty, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) Marianne Arbore, Council on Aging of St. Lucie County (COASL) Heather Young, St. Lucie TPO Attorney Diane Moore, Martin County Rob Gregg, Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) Bill Ball, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) Ann Joslin, CUTR Richard Dreyer, TOA 2 A quorum was present for the initial and organizational meeting of the RTO. Martin County Commissioner Doug Smith began the meeting until a Chairman could be elected. AGENDA ITEMS 1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Martin County Commissioner Doug Smith welcomed everyone to the inaugural Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization (TCRTO) Board meeting. Since Martin County was hosting the meeting, he volunteered to lead the meeting until a Chairman was elected. MPO Administrator Beth Beltran provided a brief introduction and welcome, expressing excitement about the kickoff of the RTO process. Ms. Beltran also explained that she and Peter Buchwald, TPO Director, would co-staff the RTO and provide various services throughout the process. She further explained that FDOT District 4 is providing assistance through state resources in the form of consultant assistance provided by the Center for Urban Transportation Research at USF (CUTR) and Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA). Mr. Buchwald also commented on his excitement about the RTO process and mentioned that he and Ms. Beltran will be working together on this process. Mr. Larry Merritt, from FDOT District 4, was introduced and spoke to the board regarding the FDOT support as a partner in the RTO process, including the commitment of funding for the consultant services. 2. CHAIRMAN AND VICE-CHAIRMAN ELECTIONS Commissioner Doug Smith opened the nominations for RTO Board Chair by nominating Councilman Jack Kelly for the position. However, Councilman Kelly declined. Councilman Kelly then nominated Commissioner Paula Lewis for Chair. After being seconded by Commissioner Eula Clark, Commissioner Lewis accepted the nomination and nominations were closed. Commissioner Lewis was elected by a unanimous vote. Commissioner Lewis assumed the Chair and suggested that the Vice-Chair should represent Martin County, similar to the joint regional TPO/MPO Board meetings. Mayor Thurlow-Lippisch then nominated Commissioner Doug Smith as Vice Chair. Commissioner Smith accepted and the the vote was unanimous for his selection. 3. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF RTO The consultant team then began a presentation on the background and process leading to the development of the RTO Board. Vice-Chairman Smith asked about the consultant contract and services that will be provided. Specific questions concerning the preparation of the agenda packet and process ensued. It was explained that the consultant team had taken the lead in preparing the materials for this inaugural meeting. The role and relationship of the 3 technical assistance provided through the FDOT contract was discussed and it was the consensus of the board members that local staff, specifically Beth Beltran and Peter Buchwald, should be the lead contacts for the Board members and should be in charge of guiding agenda preparation and other associated support activities. The consultants will work hand-in-hand with MPO/TPO staff to provide administrative and facilitation support services for the duration of the 12-month process. Mr. Buchwald assured the Board that the agenda packets will be coordinated and forwarded through the MPO and TPO staff from this point forward. Commissioner Becht requested a copy of the scope of services for the consultant to gain a better understanding of the roles and responsibilities. Commissioner Kelly suggested that Mr. Buchwald should be appointed as the lead/point person this year since the Chairman is from the same county, and then Ms. Beltran could be the lead/point person next year. Discussion regarding appointing a lead staff person ensued. Commissioner Lewis asked if there was a preference of staff. Both Mr. Buchwald and Ms. Beltran said they could coordinate and work together to ensure questions, requests, and RTO needs are handled and referred appropriately as they have for the joint MPO/TPO activities. Vice-Chairman Smith commented that he has concerns about coordination and preferred that their staff lead the support of the RTO Board. Commissioner Lewis commented that this practice has been used effectively for the joint MPO/TPO Board meetings. Commissioner Becht asked about the split reflected in the interlocal agreement for staff support (38% for Martin and 62% for St. Lucie) and what that means in dollars and when the 2010 U.S. Census results will impact the percentage. It was explained that the Census urbanized area impacts will not be known until sometime in 2012. The percentage included is based on current practice for the joint MPO/TPO activities. Mr. Bill Ball of TOA then presented background on the planning planning process, activities, and events that led to the establishment of the RTO and the meeting today. During the presentation, RTO Board member Joe Capra asked about the commitment to the RTO Action Plan and who was the sponsoring entity. It was explained that it was intended as an outline to guide the discussion and potential development of an RTA, using a model similar to the one used in Polk County. FDOT partnered with the MPO and TPO to develop the previous plans and continues to be a partner as the region goes forward. Councilman Kelly requested a copy of today’s PowerPoint presentation. RTO Board member Jacqui Thurlow-Lippisch asked for clarification on the difference between a Regional Transit Organization (RTO) and a Regional Transit Authority (RTA). Mr. Ball responded that an RTO does not have taxing authority and that the RTO was established to help coordinate and facilitate an education process that will ultimately support a decision on whether the region should establish an RTA. Mr. Gregg further explained that an RTA may have authority to tax, but may not choose to exercise that authority. 4 4. DRAFT BY-LAWS Mr. Rob Gregg of CUTR then presented the RTO with a draft sample of potential by-laws, based on the conditions and responsibilities outlined in the interlocal agreement. Much discussion was held on the purpose and specificity needed in the by-laws. Commissioner Clarke asked if by-laws should say RTA vs. RTO and after discussions it was agreed that RTO is correct. Mr Capra inquired about the timing of a decision on the formation of a RTA. Mr. Gregg stated the consultants will develop a topical program theme for future meetings to help facilitate future decisions by the board on if and how it should proceed toward the formation of an RTA. Councilman Kelly expressed concern stating that a decision on the RTA in 2012 is probably too aggressive and doesn’t give adequate time to learn the issues to make decisions. He further expressed that he prefers the schedule that was presented in Item 3, “when time is right” as the best approach on the RTA decision. Additional discussion occurred regarding regarding the potential for future funding declines and how the RTO and potential future RTA might impact this potential. Chairman Lewis expressed her interest in the fact that a RTA can get grant funding that will help the revenue situation locally. Vice-Chairman Smith then expressed concern that there may be missed opportunities/grants if the RTO takes too long to decide on the creation of a RTA. Commissioner Becht asked about other areas that have mid-to-low population densities like this region that have created RTA structures and wanted to know if RTA contacts (commissioners/council members) in those areas could be provided. Mr. Buchwald stated that information would be provided to the board. Commissioner Becht commented that he believes the by-laws should have language added regarding intermodal services such as bike and rail. Vice-Chairman Smith questioned whether that should be part of the interlocal agreement or the by-laws. Commissioner Becht would like to make sure all transportation goals such as rail along the Flagler line are incorporated into the RTO/RTA process and decision-making process, as these modes depend on one another. Ms. Beltran said that language regarding multiple modes that are “in support of transit” could be added to fulfill the request. Councilman Kelly said he will take the draft by-laws back to the city for review. Commission Clark asked that RTO staffing arrangements be included in the by-Laws. Ms. Beltran commented that the draft by-laws will be discussed at the next project management meeting. Additionally, the RTO staff will review the draft by-laws and provide additional recommendations. At the suggestion of Mr. Gregg, RTO members and staff are to review, or have reviews completed by appropriate individuals, so that a draft set of by-laws can be presented and potentially approved at the next RTO Board meeting. 5. DRAFT RTO PROGRAM Mr. Gregg presented a draft meeting schedule and indicated to the RTO Board that the interlocal agreement requires that the Board approve a schedule at the first meeting each year. The third Thursday of every other month was proposed and discussed and was generally supported by the board. However, a conflict was mentioned by Mr. Buchwald related to a 5 recurring meeting for Board appointee Commissioner Reginald Sessions. Commissioner Becht suggested another date may be needed, or perhaps the TPO (the appointing entity) should revisit the appointment and perhaps appoint him as the Board member. The Board opted through general consent to set the next meeting for October 20, 2011 as proposed, and will address the remaining meeting schedule at that time. Mr. Gregg presented a draft set of program topics for the next five Board meetings. These topics will be designed to provide the RTO members with the information they need to make informed recommendations regarding the future establishment of a RTA. After a short discussion, Vice-Chairman Smith commented that his preference would be for the consultant to work with MPO and TPO staff to identify topics for future meetings. The RTO Board agreed through consensus with the recommendation. 6. TRANSIT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TTAC) ROLE AND COMPOSITION Mr. Gregg initiated the discussion on appointing the Transit Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC). Much discussion ensued about the number of TTAC members and which entities should be represented. Vice-Chairman Smith expressed his belief that the TTAC should have members from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC), suggesting Kim Delaney specifically. He also stated his preference for a broader regional approach to include a representative from Indian River and Palm Beach Counties. Councilman Kelly inquired if the members from outside the region should be placed as ex-officio (non-voting) members. Councilman Kelly reported that the Port St. Lucie representative on the TTAC will be Kim Graham. Mr. Capra suggested that a broader representation should be added to the TTAC, such as someone from the tourism industry, hospitals, schools, and ports. After discussion, it was agreed that those not on the TTAC, could serve on a subcommittee when the time is appropriate. Vice-Chairman Smith reviewed the recommended membership from the chart in today’s PowerPoint PowerPoint presentation and it was agreed that it could be expanded from eleven shown in the chart. Vice-Chairman Smith made the motion, seconded by Councilman Kelly, for the TTAC membership from today’s PowerPoint presentation be used, but increased to include three more members, for a total of 14 voting members. The three additional members would include the TCRPC Executive Director or designee, a representative from the Palm Beach County Transit Agency , and a representative from the Indian River County Transit Agency. Discussion regarding the TTAC membership continued. Chairman Lewis mentioned that Ms. Corine Williams will be the St. Lucie County representative on the TTAC. Commissioner Becht mentioned that he will recommend that Mr. Jack Andrews of the City of Fort Pierce be appointed to the TTAC. Mr. Buchwald mentioned that there should be an airport representative on the TTAC and they will have to coordinate with the airport manager to designate a representative. Commissioner Thurlow-Lippisch asked why Jupiter Island was not identified as a potential TTAC member. Vice-Chairman Smith indicated he did not believe that Jupiter Island would be significantly impacted by RTO decisions and Ms. Beltran noted that 6 Jupiter Island was not represented on the MPO board. Councilman Kelly expressed his preference for Okeechobee County to be represented on the TTAC even if in a non-voting capacity. Mr. Ridgeley expressed concern that there is no transit system in Okeechobee County and that they would provide little value to the TTAC effort, while Palm Beach and Indian River are a more integral part to regional development and should be voting members. Commissioner Thurlow-Lippisch expressed her preference for Okeechobee County versus Palm Beach County because it is similar in size and has a slow growth philosophy. After discussion, Chairman Lewis called for a vote and it was 7-1 to approve the 14-member TTAC. 7. MASTER SCHEDULE/RTO MEETING DATES Mr. Gregg presented a master schedule for the RTO members to indicate the steps and activities that will be taken in the next year. Chairman Lewis expressed her thanks for the graphic that shows how things will fit together. There were no questions from the Board. 8. REGIONAL TRANSIT CAPITAL GRANT OPPORTUNITY Mr. Richard Dreyer of TOA made a brief presentation on a FDOT grant opportunity for RTO support. Today’s presentation was for informational purposes only, and that after the TTAC review, a recommendation will be brought back to the RTO board for endorsement of the plan. The plan will outline the needs and potential improvements using a $500,000 state grant that is being designated for regional transit capital improvements along the US 1 corridor in Martin and St. Lucie Counties. The project will focus on adding sidewalks, shelters, benches, and other facility improvements to serve the Treasure Coast Connector. Since the RTO cannot receive grants itself, an entity like St. Lucie County will be the designated administrator of the project and will work with each jurisdiction to design and construct the identified improvements. The consultant is to prepare a draft plan based on field reviews, bus ridership and traffic data, and planned projects already in development. Discussion regarding the process for the grant approval process ensued. Clarification by Mr. Buchwald was provided regarding the role of the RTO Board to make recommendations and prioritize the projects in the plan. There was discussion regarding the October 15 deadline for submission of the scope of work to FDOT and the next RTO meeting on October 20. Mr. Dreyer explained that the October 15th plan submission would take the form of a framework for the capital program and will not require the selection of final project improvements. With input from the RTO and TTAC, additional details would be developed for RTO consideration. Vice-Chairman Smith expressed the importance of regional branding for tourism and user recognition. He also mentioned the shelters utilized in Portland as an example of innovative design, system recognition, and user-friendliness. Vice-Chairman Smith directed staff to contact and coordinate with the Tourist Development Councils that are working on branding and suggested that they be involved in the process when branding is being developed. It was suggested that the RTO may want to consider establishing a subcommittee to develop a branding program for the regional services. 7 Commissioner Clarke asked for clarification of the proposed locations for future meetings and whether or not the meetings would be rotated between Martin and St. Lucie Counties. She also recommended a workshop or some other type of informational meeting for the Board prior to the October 20th meeting. Councilman Kelly mentioned his interest in providing a shelter in front of the Port St. Lucie Civic Center and asked that it be incorporated into the plan. There was further discussion about the branding effort and if it should be focused on the RTO or the capital infrastructure project. Mr. Ridgeley suggested the RTO was more of a short term initiative and the organization itself should almost be invisible. Commission Clarke inquired about what portion of the $590,000 provided by FDOT would be used for planning/consultant services versus construction or capital acquisitions. Ms. Beltran explained that $90,000 would be used for consultant related planning services and $500,000 would be dedicated to the capital program. Mr. Buchwald mentioned that St. Lucie County will be having a ribbon-cutting ceremony for the new Intermodal Transit Facility in Fort Pierce on August 23, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. 9. PUBLIC COMMENT There were no public comments. 10. BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Chairman Lewis requested that public comment be placed at the beginning of the meeting agenda to allow public comments to be received on upcoming agenda items prior to discussion. There were no other Board member comments. 11. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 4:40 P.M. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Board/Committee: RTO Board Meeting Date: October 20, 2011 Item Number: 8a Item Title: Action Item – Draft RTO By-Laws Item Description: The RTO Board is required to adopt By-Laws, rules, and procedures for the operation of the RTO and the conduct of meetings. Draft By-Laws initially were reviewed and discussed by the RTO Board at the August 18th meeting. Staff from both the Martin MPO and the St. Lucie TPO have reviewed and provided input. Additionally, the TTAC has reviewed and recommended minor corrections that have been reflected in the draft attached. The RTO Board is requested to take action. Action: Approve, approve with conditions, or do not approve the draft RTO By-Laws TTAC Recommendation: The TTAC recommended approval of the RTO By-Laws at its October 3, 2011 meeting with one change that is reflected in attachment. Staff Recommendation: It is recommended that the attached RTO By-Laws, as amended by the TTAC, be approved by the RTO Board. Attachments ? Draft RTO By-Laws Bylaws of the Treasure Coast Regional Transportation Organization (RTO) Draft Version 3.2: September, 2011 Draft Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization By-Laws 2 Section 1.0 Name of Organization The INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL TRANSIT ORGANIZATION, dated January 13, 2011, created a separate entity to be known as the TREASURE COAST REGIONAL TRANSIT ORGANIZATION (RTO). Section 2.0 Purpose and Authority 2.1 The Martin MPO and the St. Lucie TPO recognize the need to create a regional forum to promote shared goals for improved public transportation. The reasons for a Treasure Coast RTO include the following: ? Provide for efficiencies in the delivery of existing regional transit service; ? Provide for improved services with existing resources; ? Provide public transit information to the public; ? Provide a regional forum for deliberation on public transportation issues of mutual interest; ? Provide a regional voice for agreed upon public transportation policies, plans and programs ? Review funding constraints and opportunities and provide recommendations on funding; ? Provide a forum to to respond to commuter concerns and travel needs in a timely manner; and ? Promote and work toward a seamless regional public transportation system. ? May develop a recommended strategy for the transition to, and creation of, an RTA 2.2 The RTO shall be a planning organization, with staff support from the Martin MPO and the St. Lucie TPO. The RTO is to exercise all powers necessary, appurtenant, convenient, or incidental to the carrying out of the purposes for which it was created, including, but not limited to, the rights and powers set forth herein, and as established in the MPO/TPO Inter-Local Agreement. The RTO shall pursue a holistic MOBILITY MANAGEMENT approach in viewing and making recommendations to improve coordination and service delivery of Public Transportation in the Treasure Coast Region. Draft Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization By-Laws 3 Public Transportation will be viewed from a multi-modal perspective concerning accessibility, connectivity, and overall integration of road, bus, high capacity transit, paratransit, vanpooling, carpooling, bicycle and pedestrian modes of travel. Section 3.0 Treasure Coast RTO Board Membership 3.1 The Board of the RTO shall be comprised of eight (8) members to include one (1) elected official from the Martin BOCC; one (1) elected official from the St. Lucie BOCC; one (1) elected official from the City of Stuart; one (1) elected official from the City of Port St. Lucie; one (1) elected official from the City of Fort Pierce; one (1) elected official from the Town of Sewall’s Point; one (1) representative from the Economic Council of Martin County, Inc.; and one (1) representative from the Economic Development Council of St. Lucie County, Inc.. 3.2 Member appointments shall be made at official meetings of the Martin MPO and the St. Lucie TPO. Each member entity shall appoint one (1) alternate member to serve in the absence of the regular voting member. If the regular voting member is an elected official, his/her alternate must also be an elected official. 3.3 Vacancies of the Board and/or alternate members shall be filled in the same manner as appointments (described in section 3.2) Section 4.0 Quorum 4.1 A quorum of the RTO Board shall consist of five (5) voting members, (representing a “Majority”) and shall be required to conduct all official RTO business. Draft Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization By-Laws 4 Section 5.0 RTO Board Officers and Duties 5.1 A Chairman and Vice Chairman shall be elected from the membership at the first scheduled meeting of each calendar year by a majority vote at a meeting where a quorum is present. The chairman and vice chairman shall hold office no more than two consecutive years. Any member may nominate or be nominated as an officer. 5.2 The Chairman shall preside at all meetings. 5.3 The Vice Chairman shall, during the Chairman’s absence or inability to serve, have and exercise all of the duties and powers of the Chairman. The Vice Chairman shall also perform such other duties as may be assigned by the Chairman. 5.4 If both the Chairman and the Vice Chairman are absent from a meeting, a temporary Chairman shall be selected by a majority vote of the members where a quorum is present. The temporary Chairman shall serve only until either the arrival of an officer or the end of the meeting. 5.5 Any vacancy in the office of of Chairman or Vice Chairman shall be filled by a majority vote of the members where a quorum is present. Any Officer so elected shall fill the remainder of the unexpired term of the vacant office. Section 6.0 Meetings 6.1 The RTO Board shall meet at least quarterly at a date, time, and place acceptable to a majority of the members. At the last scheduled meeting of a calendar year, the Board shall adopt a regular meeting schedule for the next calendar year. 6.2 RTO Board meeting agendas shall be transmitted at least seven (7) calendar days prior to any regularly scheduled meeting. Draft Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization By-Laws 5 6.3 Special meetings of the RTO may be called by the Chairman, or in the absence of the Chairman, by the Vice Chairman with at least 24 hours notice. Special meetings may also be called on the initiative of six (6) or more voting members petitioning the chairman. 6.4 Voting shall be by voice, but a member shall have his/her vote recorded in the minutes upon request. A roll call vote shall be held upon request. All other questions or procedures shall be governed by Robert’s Rules of Order, Newly Revised. 6.5 All meetings and hearings will be open to the public. 6.6 Summary Minutes shall be kept of all meetings. Section 7.0 Advisory Committees 7.1 The RTO shall appoint a Transit Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC), consisting of technical staff from each of the participating jurisdictions. The TTAC shall provide technical recommendations to the RTO Board on public transportation issues related to the planning and implementation of regional transit services. The TTAC shall meet prior to RTO meetings to provide technical input to issues and concerns of the RTO. 7.2 The RTO may establish and maintain subcommittees, as necessary, to address specific subject areas such as marketing and service planning. These subcommittees will report to either the TTAC or RTO Board, as directed by the Board. Draft Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization By-Laws 6 Section 8.0 Amendments These Bylaws may be amended by a majority vote where a quorum is present, provided a copy of the proposed amendment shall have been sent to every member at least seven (7) calendar days before it is to be voted on. Any amendment to or modifications of these Bylaws shall take in consideration the provisions of the INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL TRANSIT ORGANIZATION. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Board/Committee: RTO Board Meeting Date: October 20, 2011 Item Number: 8b Item Title: Action Item – Draft US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan Item Description: The FDOT District 4 Office of Modal Development has secured tentative approval of a $500,000 transit capital infrastructure improvement grant for the US 1 Corridor, the area served by the Treasure Coast Connector (TCC) bus routes in St. Lucie and Martin Counties. A draft plan has been prepared that identifies capital infrastructure needs (shelters, benches, etc), establishes a prioritization process for projects, and promotes consistency through recommended design guidelines. In cooperation with FDOT and as outlined by the TTAC, a Project Description /Scope of Work has been prepared for submittal to FDOT to initiate the grant process. Action: Approve, approve with conditions, or do not approve the submission of the Project Description/Scope of Work for US 1 Corridor Transit Infrastructure Improvement program to the FDOT. TTAC Recommendation: On October 3, 2011, the US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan was presented to the TTAC for comments and recommendations. After much discussion, the TTAC approved a motion to recommend the following to the RTO Board: o Submit a Program Scope of Work for the US 1 Corridor to the FDOT, documenting the unranked bus stop infrastructure needs (Draft attached). o Designate the City of Port St. Lucie as the recipient and administering agency of state grant funds for the $500,000 Transit Corridor grant and the transit infrastructure improvement program (under the direction of the Treasure Coast RTO Board). o Establish a TTAC subcommittee to oversee the further development of the improvement program and analyze and develop infrastructure design and feasibility, refine cost estimates, and recommend investment priorities. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Treasure Coast RTO approve the recommendation of the TTAC. Attachments ? PowerPoint presentation ? Project Description /Scope of Work ? Draft US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan 1 Treasure Coast RTO Board Meeting US 1 Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan October 20, 2011 Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program October 20, 2011 @2:00 pm US 1 Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan Treasure Coast RTO Board FDOT Sponsored Assistance Presented by CUTR /TOA Team Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program FDOT Grant • FDOT regional program • $500,000 grant • Focused on US 1 • Bus stop capital plan Capital Grant Opportunity Unique Opportunity • Opportunity for RTO • Near-term improvements • US 1 Corridor Retrofit • Initiate regional identity 2 Treasure Coast RTO Board Meeting US 1 Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan October 20, 2011 Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program US 1 Corridor Retrofit Project Martin County $39 million St. Lucie County $37 million Context Sensitive Approach • Redevelopment • Rapid bus transit • Branded buses & stations • Bus priority treatments • Signal coordination • Improved grid network • Transit access & walkability • Passenger rail on FEC Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program Existing Bus Stops & Infrastructure on US 1 Amenity Martin St. Lucie Total Bus Stops 17 30 47 Benches 8 9 17 Shelters 2 1 3 Bus Bays 1 8 9 3 Treasure Coast RTO Board Meeting US 1 Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan October 20, 2011 Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program Existing Bus Stops US 1 Corridor Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program Key Elements of Plan • Project Methodology • Bus Stop Guidelines • Bus Infrastructure Needs • Preliminary Bus Stop Priorities • Next Steps 4 Treasure Coast RTO Board Meeting US 1 Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan October 20, 2011 Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program III Project Methodology • TCC = Treasure Coast Connector • PMT = Project Management Team • TTAC = Transit Technical Advisory Committee • RTO = Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program III Bus Stop Guidelines • A – Bus Bay • B – Sidewalk • C – Standard Shelter Stop • D – Standard Bench Stop • E – ADA Minimum Requirement • F – Map/Information 5 Treasure Coast RTO Board Meeting US 1 Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan October 20, 2011 Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program III Capital Needs at Existing Bus Stops Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program III Preliminary Priorities Category I Usage & Connectivity (40 points) Category II Ease of Implementation (20 points) Category III Accessibility & Quality (25 points) Category IV Access to Activity Centers (15 points) 6 Treasure Coast RTO Board Meeting US 1 Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan October 20, 2011 Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program III Additional Considerations • Sidewalk Needs • Right-of-Way Constraints • Architectural Design • Engineering Feasibility • Maintenance • Much TTAC Discussion Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program III TTAC Recommendations 1. Submit program scope to FDOT with all unranked stop improvement needs 2. Propose City of Port St. Lucie as the Grant Recipient 3. Establish a TTAC subcommittee charged to oversee improvement program & analyze: • Feasibility • Cost • Priorities 7 Treasure Coast RTO Board Meeting US 1 Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan October 20, 2011 Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization Program Grant Process & Schedule Key Task Target Dates Scope for US 1 Bus Stop Needs to FDOT D4 Oct 31, 2011 TTAC Subcommittee Nov 2011– Jun 2012 Interlocal Agreements Mar-Jun 2012 Official Grant Award Mar-Jun 2012 Implementation 2012-15 1 DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SCOPE OF WORK FOR US 1 TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Introduction The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 4 office has supported regional planning efforts and recognizes the commitment necessary to develop a cohesive and unified regional approach to transit services. FDOT is providing technical assistance to develop a bus stop capital improvement plan in support of the approved $500,000 regional transit capital infrastructure improvement grant for the US 1 corridor (FDOT Transit Corridor Grant Program). The plan is intended to identify bus stop infrastructure needs and help prioritize bus stops for improvements to transit infrastructure, including shelters, benches, bus bays, and other infrastructure, to foster improved access to bus stops and an enhanced riding experience for transit riders. The draft US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan (US 1 Corridor Plan) identifies current conditions through data collected from transit operators, field reviews, and input from local staff. Based on recommended criteria and thresholds, needed improvements were then identified for all 47 bus stops along US 1. The draft US 1 Corridor Plan is the support document that was used to develop the project description/scope of work, including the accompanying bus stop improvement table and map. Pending final direction from the Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization (RTO) Board, this project description/scope of work will be submitted to FDOT to meet their requirements to move forward with the grant administration process. Project Description/Scope of Work For the purpose of the FDOT grant program, the following project description or scope of work is to be used to develop the Joint Participation Agreement (JPA). In a joint effort in Martin and St. Lucie counties, administered through an eligible local grant recipient designated by the Treasure Coast RTO, the project consists of the design and implementation of transit infrastructure improvements along US 1 for up to 47 bus stops serving the regional Treasure Coast Connector bus routes operating on US 1. The program is to be implemented over the next three years with a tentative schedule outlined below: ? Review and refine bus stop improvement program through the TTAC, TTAC Subcommittee, and future direction of the RTO Board (November 2011 to March 2012) ? Finalize interlocal agreements and JPA (March to June 2012) ? Execute Transit Corridor Grant (target date – June 2012) ? Implement infrastructure improvements (July 2012 -June 2015) 2 Bus Stop Improvement Program A TTAC subcommittee will be convened to develop infrastructure design and feasibility, refine cost estimates, and establish investment priorities. The subcommittee will bring recommendations to the full TTAC, which will then finalize recommendations to the RTO Board. Many of the issues and activities that need to be addressed are included in Section 3 of the draft US 1 Corridor Plan, but as an example, the following items need to be planned and completed at key points within the tentative three year implementation schedule outlined on the previous page: ? Confirm the interest and eligibility of the designated recipient of the JPA and administer the funding. ? Develop and process interlocal agreements to implement design, permits, and placement of transit infrastructure. ? Complete selection of preferred design/branding and type of infrastructure to be procured. ? Develop a maintenance plan to identify requirements, responsibilities, and commitments. ? Develop detailed project budget and schedule. ? Work with the administering agency to ensure permits are appropriately obtained. Conclusion This FDOT Transit Corridor grant opportunity provides an excellent mechanism for the Treasure Coast RTO to advance regional mobility services and infrastructure in the near future. Treasure Coast Connector Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan Stop ID Stop Name Jurisdiction Direction Improvement Estimated Cost* Potential ROW Constraint** 1 10th STREET & AVENUE C St. Lucie Southbound Lighting, map/information $3,700 No 2 BENTON BUILDING St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, standard bench stop, and relocation of stop sign/pole to US 1 $12,200 Yes 3 CASH AMERICA St. Lucie Southbound Standard bench stop $12,000 Yes 4 K-MART PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound Standard bench stop, consider removing landscape between sidewalk and parking lot or moving the bus stop sign/pole closer to the store main entrance $12,200 Yes 5 SABAL PALM PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, bus bay, and standard shelter stop $42,000 No 6 TWIN VEE St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk and standard shelter stop $42,000 No 7 FARMER'S MARKET St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, and map/information $700 No 8 MIDWAY SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound Map/Information $200 No 9 RIO MAR SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound Standard shelter stop $$41,500 No 10 CHASE BANK St. Lucie Southbound Standard bench stop $12,000 No 11 SPANISH LAKES BLVD & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, and map/information $700 No 12 LA BUONA VITA & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, and map/information $700 No 13 EASTPORT PLAZA St. Lucie Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop $41,500 No 14 COUNTY ANNEX BUILDING St. Lucie Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop $41,500 No 15 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, map/information, place a sign/pole $900 No 16 CVS PHARMACY St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, map/information $700 No 17 TOWN CENTER STAPLES St. Lucie Southbound Boarding & Alighting area, map/information, consider moving sign/pole closer to the main entrance door $900 No 18 WALMART St. Lucie Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop, place a sign/pole $41,700 Yes 19 LOWE'S & BJ'S Martin Southbound Boarding & alighting area and map/information $$700 No 20 TREASURE COAST MALL Martin Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop $41,500 Yes 21 BRITT ROAD Martin Southbound Boarding & alighting area and map/information $700 No 22 DOWNTOWN PUBLIX Martin Southbound Standard Bench Stop $11,500 Yes 23 WINN DIXIE @MONTEREY Martin Southbound Map/Information $200 No 24 REGENCY SQUARE Martin Southbound Map/Information $200 No 25 WEDGEWOOD PLAZA Martin Southbound Standard Bench Stop $11,500 Yes 26 MARTIN MEMORIAL SOUTH Martin Southbound Map/Information $200 No 27 INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE Martin Southbound Map/Information $200 No 28 SALERNO VILLAGE SQUARE Martin Southbound/Northbound Place a sign/pole, standard bench stop $11,700 Yes 29 WALMART Martin Northbound Map/Information $200 No 30 STUART CENTER Martin Northbound Standard bench stop $11,500 No 31 US 1 & JOHNSON AVE Martin Northbound Map/Information $200 No 32 KIWANIS P-N-R Martin Northbound Place a sign/pole, map/information $400 No 33 PUBLIX @BAKER RD Martin Northbound Place a sign/pole, map/information information $400 No 34 PINEAPPLE COMMONS (BRITT ROAD) Martin Northbound Map/Information $200 No 35 CRACKER BARREL Martin Northbound Boarding & alighting area, map/information $700 No 36 JENNINGS ROAD St. Lucie Northbound Standard bench stop $12,000 No 37 TREASURE COAST MED BLDG St. Lucie Northbound Sidewalk and standard shelter stop $42,000 No 38 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Northbound Sidewalk and map/information $200 No 39 SAVANNA CLUB ROAD & US 1 St. Lucie Northbound Boarding & alighting area and map/information $700 No 40 VENETIAN RESTAURANT & ARCADE St. Lucie Northbound Boarding & alighting area, map/information $700 No 41 PRIMA VISTA CROSSINGS St. Lucie Northbound Standard shelter stop $42,000 No 42 RIO MAR NORTH St. Lucie Northbound Standard shelter stop $41,500 No 43 MIDWAY NORTH St. Lucie Northbound Map/Information $200 No 44 DICKSON DR & US 1 St. Lucie Northbound Map/Information $200 No 45 US 1 & EDWARDS ROAD St. Lucie Northbound Bus bay, sidewalk, and standard shelter stop $42,000 No 46 CVS PHARMACY St. Lucie Northbound Standard bench stop, consider moving sign/pole closer to the main entrance door $12,200 Yes 47 US 1 & BOSTON AVE (EAST) St. Lucie Northbound Map/Information $200 No Total Cost $593,000 Total Budget $500,000 Difference ($93,000) * Due to the significantly greater costs, Improvement categories A (bus bay) and B (sidewalks) are excluded from the table. High-end unit cost is used for cost estimate purposes. ** Identification of ROW constraints are based on a visual assessment of photos taken during field work. Additional surveying and engineering analysis needed to verify ROW needs. *** This stop will be relocated to the newly constructed intermodal facility on Avenue D and 8th St effective on 10/03/2011, and thus was excluded for prioritization. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! D C C F C E F B CB E F B E F B E F 1 9 86537 4 2 17 10 20 19 16 15 13 14 11 18 12 D F F D F F D E F 28 26 27 25 24 23 22 21 US 1 OCEAN DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE OLEANDER AVENUE N 13TH ST BECKER RDMIDWAY RD. FLORESTA DRIVE EASY ST WALTON ROAD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD GREEN RIVER PARKWAY SAEGER RD. AVE "O" AVE "H" OHIO AVE. TPK US 1 I-95 SR 76 SR 707 SR A1A SR 714 /CR 714 HIGH MEADOW COVE RD CR 76A /CR 711 UNNAMED1 SALERNO RDINDIAN ST SAVANNAH RD 42ND ST PALMER ST VETERANS MEM PKWY A t l a n t i c O c e a n 0 0.5 1Miles EL a k e O k e e c h o b e e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! F F F FF D F29 34 33 3231 30 C D CFFDF B F B C E F E F E F A B C 41 38 36 37 39 42 43 45 40 47 46 44 35 US 1 OCEAN DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE OLEANDER AVENUE N 13TH ST BECKER RD FLORESTA DRIVE EASY ST WALTON ROAD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CITRUS AVE GREEN RIVER PARKWAY FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE AVE "O" AVE "H" TPK US 1 I-95 SR 76 SR 707 SR A1A SR 714 /CR 714 HIGH MEADOW COVE RD CR 76A /CR 711 UNNAMED1 SALERNO RD INDIAN ST SAVANNAH RD 42ND ST PALMER ST VETERANS MEM PKWY Southbound Stop Capital Improvements Northbound Stop Capital Improvements Legend ! TCC Stop St. Lucie TCC Route Martin TCC Route Map 2-1 TCC Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan A -Bus Bay B -Sidewalk C -Standard Shelter Stop D -Standard Bench Stop E -Boarding & Alighting Area F -Map/Information Improvement Category !!!! ! F DD B D A B C 1 5 3 42 US 1 N 13TH ST SUNRISE BLVD ORANGE AVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE AVENUE "D" S 17 STREET OLEANDER AVENUE OHIO AVE. ! !!! ! C C E F B E F B E F 17 16 15 13 14 US 1 WA LTON ROAD Note: Numbers next to each stop indicate Stop ID corresponding to Table 2-2 in the report US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan Draft Technical Memorandum #1 Prepared for: Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization (RTO) Prepared by: Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1000 Ashley Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33602 ph (813) 224-8862, fax (813) 226-2106 In association with: Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida September 2011 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: INTRODUCTION ........................ ................................................................................................. 1-1 Treasure Coast Connector ........................................................................ .................................. 1-1 US 1 Corridor Retrofit Project ....................................................................................................... 1-3 Existing Bus Stop Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 1-3 Section 2: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFICATION AND PRIORITIZATION .................................... 2-1 Project Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................. 2-2 Design Guidelines ................................... .................................................................................... 2-3 Needs Plan ................................................................................................... ............................... 2-5 Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 2-5 Project Prioritization ..................................................................................................................... 2-12 Section 3: ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION & NEXT STEPS ...................................................................... 3-1 Additional Consideration ................................................................................................... ........... 3-1 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................... 3-2 Summary ............................ ....................................................................................................... 3-2 Appendix A: DATA COLLECTION SHEET ......................................................... .......................................... A-1 Appendix B: PHOTOS OF EXISTING BUS STOPS BY LOCATION ............................................................. B-1 Appendix C: SUMMARY OF BUS STOP PRIORITIZATION RESULTS ........................................................ C-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1: Stop Summary by County and Type of Transit Infrastructure ................... .................................. 1-3 Table 2-1: Bus Stop Design Guidelines ........................................................................................................ 2-3 Table 2-2: Bus Stop Capital Improvement Needs Plan ................................................................................. 2-6 Table 2-3: Bus Stop Stop Prioritization Results .................................................................................................... 2-13 Table 3-1: Next Steps for US 1 Capital Infrastructure Improvement Plan ...................... .............................. 3-3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1: Project Methodology .................................................................................................................... 2-1 Figure 2-2: Bus Stop Evaluation Criteria and Weights .................................................................................... 2-11 LIST OF MAPS Map 1-1: TCC Bus Route ............................................................................................................................... 1-2 Map 2-1: TCC Bus Stop Capital Improvement ......................... .......................................................................... 2-8 Map 2-2: TCC Bus Stop Priorities…………………………………………………………………………………….... 2-14 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 1-1 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 1: Introduction The St. Lucie Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) and Martin County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) have undertaken a series of transit planning and consensus-building activities leading to the development of a Transit Authority Action Plan (January 2010). The Action Plan identifies the purpose and need to establish a regional transit authority (RTA) for the Treasure Coast region. The first action in the Mid-Term Action Plan section of the report is to establish an interim Regional Transit Organization (RTO), accomplished through an interlocal agreement between the TPO and MPO (effective January 13, 2011). The RTO has been established, and an inaugural meeting was held on August 18, 2011. The RTO is charged with leading discussions of regional transit concepts and coordination and, ultimately, making recommendations regarding regional transit issues and governance for Martin and St. Lucie counties. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 4 office has supported the regional planning efforts and recognizes the commitment necessary to develop a cohesive and unified regional approach. To assist the RTO and the staff of the TPO and MPO, FDOT is funding technical and administrative assistance to support the RTO Board. An additional support effort is the approval of a $500,000 transit capital infrastructure improvement grant for the US 1 corridor to support the regional transit services currently operating within the corridor in Martin and St. Lucie counties. One of the major tasks of the technical assistance is development of a bus stop capital improvement plan for proposed infrastructure improvements along the US 1 corridor. The plan is intended to identify and prioritize bus stops for improvements to transit infrastructure on the corridor, supporting the Treasure Coast Connector (TCC) and other bus routes operating on or connecting to US 1. The TCC route is the one inter-county fixed-route regional bus service between Martin County and St. Lucie County, and potential improvements include shelters, benches, bus bays, and other infrastructure to foster improved access to bus stops and better services along the corridor. TREASURE COAST CONNECTOR St. Lucie County, through its Housing and Community Services Department, contracts with Community Transit to provide public transportation services. Community Transit operates six fixed bus routes in the county, including one regional fixed-bus route, the TCC. This is an inter-county bus service running along the US 1 corridor between St. Lucie and Martin counties. Before July 2010, the northern terminus of TCC was at 8th Street & Avenue D in Fort Pierce, and the southern terminus was at the Martin Memorial Medical Center in Martin County. Since July 1, 2010, TCC service has been split into two separate routes. Each county is responsible for operating its own portion of the service located within their respective jurisdictional boundaries. The new TCC route operated by St. Lucie County—Treasure Coast Connector Route 1—begins service at 10th Street and Avenue C in Fort Pierce and ends at Treasure Coast Square Mall in Martin County. The new portion of the TCC route operated by Martin County—Martin County US 1 Corridor Route—extends from the Walmart in Port St. Lucie along US 1 south to Salerno Village Square. For the scope of this bus stop capital infrastructure plan, the entire length of the new TCC alignment operated in both St. Lucie and Martin counties is included in the analysis and identified as the TCC. Map 1-1 includes both the pre and post-July 1, 2011 TCC routes. !!!!!!!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! US 1 OCEAN DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE OLEANDER AVENUE N 13TH ST BECKER RD MIDWAY RD. EASY ST WALTON ROAD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD SUNRISE BLVD GREEN RIVER PARKWAY PRIMA VISTA BLVD VILLAGE GREEN DR. SAVANNAH RD SAEGER RD. AVE "O" AVE "H" AVENUE "A" JENNINGS RD. TPK US 1 I-95 SR 76 SR 707 SR A1A SR 714 /CR 714 HIGH MEADOW COVE RD CR 76A /CR 711 UNNAMED1 SALERNO RD INDIAN ST SAVANNAH RD MAPP RD /MURPHY RD 42ND ST MATHESON RD /MAPP RD UNNAMED3 PALMER ST VETERANS MEM PKWY A t l a n t i c O c e a n 0 0.5 1Miles EL a k e O k e e c h o b e e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! US 1 OCEAN DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE OLEANDER AVENUE N 13TH ST BECKER RDMIDWAY RD. FLORESTA DRIVE EASY ST WALTON ROAD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD SUNRISE BLVD CITRUS AVE GREEN RIVER PARKWAY FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE PRIMA VISTA BLVD VILLAGE GREEN DR. SAVANNAH RD AVE "O" AVE "H" AVENUE "A" JENNINGS RD. TPK US 1 I-95 SR 76 SR 707 SR A1A SR 714 /CR 714 HIGH MEADOW COVE RD CR 76A /CR 711 UNNAMED1 SALERNO RD INDIAN ST SAVANNAH RD MAPP RD /MURPHY RD 42ND ST MATHESON RD /MAPP RD UNNAMED3 PALMER ST VETERANS MEM PKWY TCC Route Before 07/1/2010 TCC Route After 07/1/2010 ! New St. Lucie TCC Stop New St. Lucie TCC Route ! New Martin TCC Stop New Martin TCC Route Map 1-1 Pre and Post 07/1/2011 TCC Routes Legend ! Old TCC Route Stop Old TCC Route PSL Wal-Mart Transfer Center Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 1-3 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 1: Introduction US 1 CORRIDOR RETROFIT PROJECT The TPO and MPO have worked jointly on a number of regional planning activities, including the Enhancing Mobility Martin-St. Lucie 2035 Regional Long Range Transportation Plan, adopted in February 2011. In the Enhancing Mobility plan, the US 1 corridor figured prominently in the priority for transportation needs and cost feasible revenue sources. The overall approach for the US 1 improvements is identified as the US 1 Corridor Retrofit Project and includes a significant investment level over the 20-year planning horizon. In the plan, the corridor is recognized as being physically constrained and alternatives to roadway widening are emphasized to achieve viable transportation options and enhanced transportation operational efficiency. The strategies include: ? Transit-supportive redevelopment ? Bus rapid transit (BRT) ? ? Branded buses and stations ? Bus priority treatments, including signal priority and bus queue jumper lanes ? Signal coordination improvements ? Improved grid network of connecting streets ? Context-sensitive design solutions that encourage transit accessibility and walkability ? Sustainable redevelopment following Livable Communities Initiative principles ? Regional and inter-city passenger rail services The US 1 bus stop capital improvement plan will allow the RTO to begin implementation of improvements associated with the retrofit project, perhaps allowing future projects coming out of the Enhancing Mobility plan to focus more on longer-term major improvements. EXISTING BUS STOP INFRASTRUCTURE Currently, bus stops along the TCC routes consist of a modest level of infrastructure and amenities. Of the 47 TCC stops, 3 have shelters and 17 have benches. In addition, several stops require upgrades to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility requirements. Some transit stops along US 1 had benches before, which were removed due to safety issues and/or to be in compliance with FDOT ADA Accessibility Guidelines. Table 1-1 provides a bus stop infrastructure summary by county, including the type of transit infrastructure available at bus stops (benches, shelters, and bus bays). Table 1-1 US 1 Bus Stop Summary by County and Type of Transit Infrastructure Infrastructure Components Martin County St. Lucie County Total Northbound Southbound Both Northbound Southbound Both Bus Stops 7 8 2 12 15 3 47 Benches 3 4 1 4 4 1 17 Shelters 2 0 0 1 0 0 3 Bus Bays 0 0 1 4 3 1 9 Note: Stops for both NB and SB directions (e.g., Eastport Plaza) were counted as one stop. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 1-4 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 1: Introduction To propose appropriate service improvements to bus stops, an extensive field review effort was performed, transit infrastructure design guidelines were developed, and stop-by-stop infrastructure improvements were identified and prioritized. The remainder of this report documents the efforts undertaken to develop a draft capital improvement plan for the US 1 corridor. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-1 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization This section documents the process used to identify and prioritize transit capital improvements for each bus stop along the TCC corridor. The project methodology is presented first, followed by data collection and design guidelines. The evaluation methodology is then applied to identify and prioritize bus stops for capital improvements. PROJECT METHODOLGY Figure 2-1 illustrates the methodology used to guide the project. The first step in the chart represents the data collection effort, which compiled information from various data sources. After performing analysis of the data, evaluation criteria and a needs plan were developed simultaneously. An objective prioritization process using evaluation criteria was performed to rank the stops with the greatest need relative to other bus stops along the corridor. Figure 2-1 Project Methodology Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-2 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization DATA COLLECTION To identify capital improvements and prioritize bus stops for improvements along the TCC corridor, data were collected as summarized below. ? TCC Route Data o Current TCC route alignment and stop locations (provided by Martin and St. Lucie counties) o Current TCC stop inventory (provided by Martin and St. Lucie counties) o TCC monthly stop-level ridership from FY 2003 to FY 2011 (provided by St. Lucie County) o TCC (Martin route) daily stop-level ridership for July and August 2011 (provided by Martin County) ? Bus Stop Data o Existing stop infrastructure and condition (field work by consulting team) ? Other reports and data o FDOT District 4, “Transit Facility Guidelines (Version 3)” o FDOT, “Accessing Transit—Design Handbook for Florida Bus Passenger Facilities (Version 2)” o Pasco County Public Transportation (PCPT), “Transit Infrastructure Guidelines Manual” o Ocala-Marion County, “2035 Long Range Transportation Plan” o Prince George’s County, Maryland & Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Pedestrian to Transit Accessibility Prioritization -Technical Assistance: Transportation/Land-Use Connections (TLC) Program, Final Report (May 2010) Field work was conducted to assess the physical condition and infrastructure at each stop. That assessment allowed for the determination of possible stop infrastructure deficiencies, observation of nearby traffic conditions, and identification of adjacent land uses. Two field visits were conducted, one on July 7, 2011, and the other on August 11, 2011. During the first visit, bus stop data were collected for the TCC route operated by St. Lucie County. During the second visit, the same bus stop data were collected at 12 additional bus stops for the TCC route operated by Martin County. In addition, the following two bus routes (southbound and northbound directions) were ridden to observe activities at the bus stops where data were collected: ? Treasure Coast Connector Plus Route 1 (operated by St. Lucie County): US 1 from the Treasure Coast Square Mall bus stop (Martin County) to the 10th Street and Avenue C bus stop (St. Lucie County) ? Martin County US 1 Corridor Route (operated by Martin County): US 1 from the Salerno Village Square bus stop (Martin County) to the Walmart bus stop (St. Lucie County) To better organize the field data collection process, a data collection form was prepared. Appendix A includes a table that summarizes the bus stop data collected in the field. Data are grouped into three categories: stop amenities, special needs, and activity centers. For each stop listed, a “yes” indicates applicable elements under corresponding columns, and blank cells indicate that the corresponding element is not applicable. The field data collection also included taking photographs of each bus stop (provided in Appendix B). Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-3 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization DESIGN GUIDELINES Design guidelines were developed to facilitate the determination of stop-by-stop capital needs. The major objectives for creating design guidelines include: ? Ensure each stop meets the minimum ADA requirements. ? Ensure stops with similar characteristics receive consistent service improvement recommendations. ? Improve the level and quality of transit-supportive infrastructure along the US 1 corridor. ? Promote safety and security at stops. ? Improve the overall attractiveness of transit as a commute alternative. ? Ensure consistency with the US 1 Corridor Retrofit Project identified in the 2035 Martin/St. Lucie Regional Long Range Transportation Plan. Collectively, all of these factors are expected to bolster ridership, increase the visibility of TCC service, and improve the general perception of transit service in the area. Six capital improvement categories were developed to organize and standardize stop improvements. As shown in Table 2-1, the stop improvement categories are distinguished by ridership, traffic conditions, and/or ADA requirements. Specific improvement categories are recommended for each stop based on these characteristics such that stops with similar features achieve the same design standard. Table 2-1: Bus Stop Design Guidelines Category Infrastructure Components Unit Cost/Cost Range Thresholds A Bus Bay $550,000 Traffic speed > 40 mph, and traffic volume/lane/hour: < 1,000 vehicles B Sidewalk (per mile 5' width) $200,000 -$350,000 ADA minimum requirement C Standard Shelter Stop $32,000 – $42,000 Recommended when average monthly ridership >= 148 Shelter Bench Lighting Boarding & Alighting Area Trash Receptacle Map/Information Bike Racks D Standard Bench Stop $10,000 – $12,000 Recommended when average monthly ridership >= 112 Bench Boarding & Alighting Area Trash Receptacle Map/Information Bike Racks E ADA Required $500* Standard for every stop Boarding & Alighting Area F Map/Information $200 Standard for every stop *Typical cost for a B&A area when included as a part of a standard shelter or bench stop, or other larger project. If constructed separately, the cost may be higher. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-4 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization Table 2-1 presents the design guidelines used to guide the improvements recommended for each bus stop along the US 1 corridor. The thresholds and cost information associated with each improvement category are based on industry reports previously listed on page 2-2 and data gathered from various transit agencies in similar communities (e.g. LYNX, Ocala, MTA-Maryland) regarding recent infrastructure improvement projects. In addition to the design guidelines presented in Table 2-1, the following is a summary of related issues when applying the design guidelines to bus stops. Americans with Disabilities Act According to ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG), bus stops must meet the minimum requirements set by ADAAG. In particular, a bus stop must have (1) an unobstructed accessible path connecting to the nearest sidewalk or other reasonably accessible facility, and (2) a boarding and alighting (B&A) area for riders to access the bus. While the field review was not intended to be a comprehensive assessment of ADA compliance, a cursory assessment of each stop was conducted to assist in determining ADA compliance. Bus stops that do not have the minimum elements include recommendations to add ADA required elements. Additional field analysis may be required to determine and ensure site-specific ADA compliance beyond the review that was possible within the scope of this project. Bus Stop Infrastructure Components Standard shelter or bench stops include a host of components that improve the comfort and overall experience of transit riders as indicated in Table 2-1. The St. Lucie TPO policy requires that bike rack infrastructure be included at all shelter stops. This plan includes bike racks as a standard component for all standard bench and shelter stops. Depending on the specific situation, some components may be added to a standard shelter stop or bench stop. For example, coordinating with the newspaper vendors may allow a couple of newspaper stands to be placed in the near vicinity of stop. It would give bus riders an opportunity to purchase a paper while waiting for the bus. For the bus stops located in a shopping plaza, a designated shopping cart return area may be set up adjacent to a bus stop for rider’s convenience. Some instances, some elements may be excluded from a standard shelter or bench stop. For example, if a B&A area currently exists, installation of standard shelter or bench stop would exclude that element. Branding TCC service and bus stops would benefit greatly from unique branding that portrays a consistent and recognizable design, color scheme, and logo at all stops and is supported by a consistent design of published materials (schedules, route map, etc.). The application of uniform branding will enhance recognition and visibility of the TCC service to users and non-users. This effort also may help to bolster recognition of regional transit services and foster support for a regional transit perspective. Incorporating non-required infrastructure such as “green” or environmentally friendly applications of technology or specific local flora or trees to landscaping could be considered as part of the elements to help delineate the regional services. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-5 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization Bus Bays/Sidewalks Bus bays or sidewalks are recommended at appropriate stops if corresponding thresholds are met. Although estimated unit costs for bus bays and sidewalks are provided in Table 2-1, these costs were not reflected in the capital improvement cost estimate. This is because of the following factors: ? The total budget for the project is $500,000, and installation of one bus bay likely would expend the entire budget limit for one stop. Consequently, a bus bay is considered feasible only if additional funding were identified beyond the initial $500,000 grant. Also, the justification for bus bays includes a number of factors, and each location is unique and should have a feasibility assessment or warrant study completed. ? Determination of sidewalk cost is contingent upon the accurate measurement of the length required to connect a bus stop to the nearest accessible path. The installation of longer sections of sidewalk also could consume a large portion of the initial capital budget, and drainage and right-of-way (ROW) issues cannot be defined without appropriate surveying and engineering analysis, which is beyond this scope of work. Consequently, long sections of sidewalk installation need to be considered on a case-by-case basis separate from this plan. NEEDS PLAN Based on the basic design guidelines, a review of each stop along the TCC corridor was conducted to evaluate its physical characteristics, traffic conditions, and ridership information. The results of the evaluation were compared with the thresholds presented in Table 2-1. Improvement categories for each stop are presented in Table 2-2 and illustrated in Map 2-1. Improvements in Table 2-2 constitute the needs plan for bus stop capital infrastructure and amenities within the US 1 corridor. Note that this table does not reflect bus stop priorities but rather a list of bus stops and associated needs sorted by a unique bus stop identification number assigned to each stop. EVALUATION CRITERIA Evaluation criteria were developed and used to identify and prioritize needs plan improvements. Four categories of evaluation criteria were developed: ? Category I: Usage and Connectivity (40 points) ? Category II: Ease of Implementation (20 points) ? Category III: Accessibility and Quality (25 points) ? Category IV: Access to Activity Centers (15 points) By employing specific measurements for the criteria within each category, a ranking of bus stops in need of improvements was established. The criteria and weighting were developed based on the data collection process, input from technical resources, and professional judgment. Adjustments will be considered based on feedback received from the Project Management Team (PMT) and Transit Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC). A total of 100 points are allocated to the four categories as indicated in the list above and the summary below. An illustration of the categories and evaluation criteria is provided in Figure 2-2. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-6 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization Table 2-2 Bus Stop Capital Improvement Needs Plan Stop ID Stop Name Jurisdiction Direction Improvement Category Additional Note 1 10th ST & AVENUE C* St. Lucie Southbound N/A 2 BENTON BLDG St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, standard bench stop Consider relocation of stop sign/pole to US 1 3 CASH AMERICA St. Lucie Southbound Standard bench stop 4 K-MART PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound Standard bench stop Consider removing landscape between sidewalk and parking lot or moving bus stop sign/pole closer to store main door 5 SABAL PALM PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, bus bay, and standard shelter stop 6 TWIN VEE St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk and standard shelter stop 7 FARMER'S MARKET St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, and map/information 8 MIDWAY SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound Map/information 9 RIO RIO MAR SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound Standard shelter stop 10 CHASE BANK St. Lucie Southbound Standard bench stop 11 SPANISH LAKES BLVD & St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, and map/information 12 LA BUONA VITA & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, and map/information 13 EASTPORT PLAZA St. Lucie Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop 14 COUNTY ANNEX St. Lucie Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop 15 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, map/information Place a sign/pole 16 CVS PHARMACY St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, map information 17 TOWN CENTER STAPLES St. Lucie Southbound Boarding & alighting area, map/information Consider moving sign/pole closer to main entrance door 18 WALMART St. Lucie Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop, place a sign/pole 19 LOWE'S & BJ'S Martin Southbound Boarding & alighting area and map/information 20 TREASURE COAST MALL Martin Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop 21 BRITT ROAD Martin Southbound Boarding & alighting area and map/information 22 DOWNTOWN PUBLIX Martin Southbound Standard bench stop 23 WINN DIXIE @MONTEREY Martin Southbound Map/information *This stop will be relocated to the newly constructed intermodal facility on Avenue D and 8th St effective on 10/03/2011, and thus was excluded for capital improvement. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-7 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization Table 2-2 Bus Stop Capital Improvement Needs Plan (continued) Stop ID Stop Name Jurisdiction Direction Improvement Additional Note 24 REGENCY SQUARE Martin Southbound Map/information 25 WEDGEWOOD PLAZA Martin Southbound Standard bench stop 26 MARTIN MEMORIAL Martin Southbound Map/information 27 INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE Martin Southbound Map/information 28 SALERNO VILLAGE Martin Southbound/Northbound Standard bench stop Place a sign/pole 29 WALMART Martin Northbound Map/information 30 STUART CENTER Martin Northbound Standard bench stop Relocate stop from near parking space for improved safety and accessibility 31 US 1 & JOHNSON AVE Martin Northbound Map/information 32 KIWANIS PARKAND-RIDE Martin Northbound Map/information Place a sign/pole 33 PUBLIX @BAKER RD Martin Northbound Map/information Place a sign/pole 34 PINEAPPLE COMMONS (BRITT RD) Martin Northbound Map/information 35 CRACKER BARREL Martin Northbound Boarding & alighting area, map/information 36 JENNINGS RD St. Lucie Northbound Standard bench stop 37 TREASURE COAST MED St. Lucie Northbound Sidewalk and standard shelter stop 38 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Northbound Sidewalk and map/information 39 SAVANNA CLUB ROAD & US 1 St. Lucie Northbound Boarding & alighting area and map/information 40 VENETIAN RESTAURANT & St. Lucie Northbound Boarding & alighting area, map/information 41 PRIMA VISTA CROSSINGS St. Lucie Northbound Standard shelter stop 42 RIO MAR NORTH St. Lucie Northbound Standard shelter stop 43 MIDWAY NORTH St. Lucie Northbound Map/information 44 DICKSON DR & US 1 St. Lucie Northbound Map/information 45 US 1 & EDWARDS RD St. Lucie Northbound Bus bay, sidewalk, and standard shelter stop 46 CVS PHARMACY St. Lucie Northbound Standard bench stop Consider moving sign/pole closer to main entrance door 47 US 1 & BOSTON AVE (EAST) St. Lucie Northbound Map/Map/information ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!!!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! D C C F C E F B CB E F B E F B E F 1 9 86537 4 2 17 10 20 19 16 15 13 14 11 18 12 D F F D F F D E F 28 26 27 25 24 23 22 21 US 1 OCEAN DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE OLEANDER AVENUE N 13TH ST BECKER RDMIDWAY RD. FLORESTA DRIVE EASY ST WALTON ROAD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD GREEN RIVER PARKWAY SAEGER RD. AVE "O" AVE "H" OHIO AVE. TPK US 1 I-95 SR 76 SR 707 SR A1A SR 714 /CR 714 HIGH MEADOW COVE RD CR 76A /CR 711 UNNAMED1 SALERNO RDINDIAN ST SAVANNAH RD 42ND ST PALMER ST VETERANS MEM PKWY A t l a n t i c O c e a n 0 0.5 1Miles EL a k e O k e e c h o b e e ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !F F F FF D F29 34 33 3231 30 C D CFFDF B F B C E F E F E F A B C 41 38 36 37 39 42 43 45 40 47 46 44 35 US 1 OCEAN DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE OLEANDER AVENUE N 13TH ST BECKER RD FLORESTA DRIVE EASY ST WALTON ROAD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CITRUS AVE GREEN RIVER PARKWAY FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE AVE "O" AVE "H" TPK US 1 I-95 SR 76 SR 707 SR A1A SR 714 /CR 714 HIGH MEADOW COVE RD CR 76A /CR 711 UNNAMED1 SALERNO RD INDIAN ST SAVANNAH RD 42ND ST PALMER ST VETERANS MEM PKWY Southbound Stop Capital Improvements Northbound Stop Capital Improvements Legend ! TCC Stop St. Lucie TCC Route Martin TCC Route Map 2-1 TCC Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan A -Bus Bay B -Sidewalk C -Standard Shelter Stop D -Standard Bench Stop E -Boarding & Alighting Area F -Map/Information Improvement Category !!!! ! F DD B D A B C 1 5 3 42 US 1 N 13TH ST SUNRISE BLVD ORANGE AVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE AVENUE "D" S 17 STREET OLEANDER AVENUE OHIO AVE. ! !!! ! C C E F B E F B E F 17 16 15 13 14 US 1 WA LTON ROAD Note: Numbers next to each stop indicate Stop ID corresponding to Table 2-2 in the report Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-9 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization Category I: Usage and Connectivity (40 points) Determining direct passenger volumes and potential transfer passenger volumes at bus stops is a critical component to consider when establishing priorities for bus stop improvements. A bus stop with high ridership has more passengers using the stop, and consequently any inadequacies found at the stop will impact a greater number of individuals. This rationale results in the conclusion that bus stops used by a greater number of bus riders should rank higher than those stops with lower demand. Two measures are included in this criterion to reflect direct passenger volumes and potential transfer passenger volumes. Average Monthly Ridership The first criterion in this category is average monthly stop ridership. Stop level monthly ridership from FY 2005 to FY 2010 was collected for St. Lucie County and evaluated for trends and other unusual patterns or variations. After review, it was determined that using the average monthly ridership over the five years provided the most reliable indicator for this criterion. For Martin County, stop level ridership for July and August 2011 was collected. Due to the absence of historical data, it was determined that using the ridership from August would be the most reliable. The system-wide mean for average bus stop monthly ridership is 106 passenger boardings (standard deviation = 80). For this criterion, a bus stop with an average monthly ridership exceeding 187 passenger boardings (106 + 81 = 187) received the highest score of 30 points. Likewise, a bus stop with an average monthly ridership between 106 and 187 received a score of 20 points. As the number of passenger boardings falls, the assigned score also declines. Connectivity to Existing Transit Service Since transfer passenger volume data are not readily available, potential transfer passenger volumes are reflected by connectivity to other bus routes. Connectivity measures the number of existing bus routes intersecting the ¼-mile service area of a stop. A ¼-mile buffer generally is considered an industry standard and reflects the typical distance that a bus rider is willing to walk to access a bus stop. A stop with connections to multiple bus routes logically suggests greater transfer opportunities for bus riders and thus substantiates a higher ranking. Category II: Implementation Ease (20 Points) The second category of criteria examines feasibility and ease of implementation for a given bus stop to receive recommended capital improvements. Measures include implementation cost and implementation schedule. Cost of Implementation Due to limited funding, the cost of implementation is an important factor to consider when prioritizing bus stops for improvement. A stop with major improvements that require a significant investment can consume a large portion of funding and thus preclude preclude other stops from being improved. Consequently, this measurement ensures that a bus stop receives a higher score when its improvement recommendations have a relatively lower cost. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-10 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization Implementation Schedule Similarly, a higher score is assigned to a bus stop with improvement recommendations that can be implemented more quickly. For the purpose of this plan, a reasonable time frame for a project to be completed is 6 to 12 months. Thus, projects requiring extensive engineering and design elements and/or a significant permitting process are ranked lower than projects that can be implemented in a shorter period of time. Based on this consideration, bus stops for which improvements can be completed within six months are assigned 10 points (within 12 months = 5 points, >12 months = 0 points). Category III: Accessibility and Quality (25 Points) A bus stop should be properly and easily accessible by potential bus riders from the immediate surroundings. In addition, a bus stop consisting of a host of components reflects a more attractive facility and thus enhances the image of transit in the community and the quality of the bus rider experience. Accessibility in this context means the availability or convenience to which an individual may approach and enter the bus stop area, while quality refers to the availability of required infrastructure (ADAAG requirements) and other bus stop components for bus riders as they wait for the bus. This category is evaluated using three criteria, as summarized below. Presence of Sidewalk An important criterion of accessibility is the presence of sidewalk connectivity between the bus stop and the nearest intersection or other accessible facility. A sidewalk enables passengers to access a bus stop in a convenient and safe manner. This criterion is divided into two categories. Zero points are assigned to a bus stop that has the presence of an unobstructed sidewalk, and 5 points go to a bus stop at which no sidewalk is present. Presence of Boarding and Alighting Area The second measure examines the existence of an ADAAG-compliant boarding and alighting area. According to the standard, bus stop boarding and alighting areas must have a firm, stable surface with a minimum clear length of 96 inches from the back of curb or edge of travel lane and a minimum clear width of 60 inches parallel to the vehicle travel lane. A bus stop without a boarding and alighting area is assigned 5 points, and a bus stop with the appropriate boarding and alighting area is assigned 0 points. Presence of Infrastructure Components The third measure relates to the quality of a bus stop based on the number of components, i.e., bench, shelter, trash receptacle, etc. Generally, a stop without a bench and/or shelter manifests a poor image for customer service and quality and is not attractive to existing or potential riders. Other components such as stop/street lighting, trash receptacle, and system map and information further enhance the quality of the customer experience with a bus stop. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-11 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization Figure 2-2 Bus Stop Evaluation Criteria and Weights Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-12 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization Category IV: Access to Activity Centers (15 Points) It is preferred that a bus stop be placed in a strategic setting that allows the transit service to most effectively and efficiently serve trip generators and activity centers. Activity centers refer to major residential, employment, commercial, and government service centers that generally are located at the core of transit-supportive land uses. Stops adjacent to activity centers and transit-supportive land uses are better candidates for improvements (if needed). The following are the major residential, employment, or activity centers included under this category: ? Medical facility ? School or university ? Shopping mall or center ? Apartment building ? Recreational facility ? Government services ? Civic or convention center ? Office building The number of trip generators and activity centers within a ¼ -mile buffer of each bus stop was counted, with 3 points awarded for each trip generator or activity center that falls within the buffer. The point assignment is additive, with 3 points awarded for each trip generator or activity center, up to a maximum of 15 points. PROJECT PRIORITIZATION Based on the criteria and measures presented in Figure 2-2, each bus stop is awarded a final score by summing the total points assigned for each category. Stops then are ranked in descending order to prioritize stops with the greatest need for improvement. Table 2-3 includes a prioritized list of stops, the associated capital improvement recommendations, and an estimate of probable cost. Map 2-2 and Table 2-3 illustrate and summarize the priority ranking of each stop and the associated capital improvement recommendations. Potential ROW constraints also are noted in the table according to professional judgments made based on field observations. Surveying and engineering analysis are required to accurately determine if ROW is required for certain improvements. An additional consideration for bus stop improvement priories relates to whether bus stops are located on privatelyowned or publicly-owned property not within the state US 1 corridor ROW. If ROW is needed, it is anticipated that the appropriate jurisdiction will need to negotiate interlocal or joint use agreements with property owners to offset any or most potential costs to facilitate the use of ROW. The alternative is to acquire ROW. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 2-13 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Identification and Prioritization Table 2-3 Bus Stop Prioritization Results Stop ID Stop Name Jurisdiction Direction Improvement Cost* ROW Constraint** Total Score Rank 3 CASH AMERICA St. Lucie Southbound Standard bench stop $12,000 Yes 72 1 46 CVS PHARMACY St. Lucie Northbound Standard bench stop, consider moving sign/pole closer to main entrance door $12,200 Yes 72 2 2 BENTON BLDG St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, standard bench stop, and relocation of stop sign/pole to US 1 $12,200 Yes 70 3 28 SALERNO VILLAGE SQUARE Martin Southbound/Northbound Place a sign/pole, standard bench stop $11,700 Yes 63 4 1 10th STREET & AVENUE C*** St. Lucie Southbound N/A N/A No 62 36 JENNINGS ROAD St. Lucie Northbound Standard bench stop $12,000 No 62 5 14 COUNTY ANNEX BUILDING St. Lucie Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop $41,500 No 60 6 17 TOWN CENTER STAPLES St. Lucie Southbound Boarding & alighting area, map/information, consider moving sign/pole closer to main entrance door $900 No 60 7 32 KIWANIS P-N-R Martin Northbound Place a sign/pole, map/information $400 No 60 8 30 STUART CENTER Martin Northbound Standard bench stop, relocate stop from near parking space for improved safety and accessibility $11,500 Yes 59 9 13 EASTPORT PLAZA St. Lucie Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop $41,500 No 58 10 22 DOWNTOWN PUBLIX Martin Southbound Standard Bench Stop $11,500 Yes 58 11 4 K-MART PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound Standard bench stop, consider removing landscape between sidewalk and parking lot or moving bus stop sign/pole closer to store main $12,200 Yes 57 12 25 WEDGEWOOD PLAZA Martin Southbound Standard bench stop $11,500 Yes 54 13 10 CHASE BANK St. Lucie Southbound Standard bench stop $12,000 No 52 14 23 WINN DIXIE @MONTEREY Martin Southbound Map/information $200 No 51 15 16 CVS PHARMACY St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, map/information $700 No 50 16 35 CRACKER BARREL Martin Northbound Boarding & alighting area, map/information $700 No 50 17 40 VENETIAN RESTAURANT & ARCADE St. Lucie Northbound Boarding & alighting area, map/information $700 No 50 18 19 LOWE'S & BJ'S Martin Southbound Boarding & alighting area and map/information $700 No 50 19 47 US 1 & BOSTON AVE (EAST) St. Lucie Northbound Map/information $200 No 47 20 39 SAVANNA CLUB RD & US 1 St. Lucie Northbound Boarding & alighting area and map/information $700 No 47 21 15 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, map/information, place a sign/pole $900 No 46 22 18 WALMART St. Lucie Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop, place a sign/pole $41,700 Yes 46 23 20 TREASURE COAST MALL Martin Northbound/Southbound Standard shelter stop $41,500 Yes 46 24 41 PRIMA VISTA CROSSINGS St. Lucie Northbound Standard shelter stop $42,000 No 46 25 5 SABAL PALM PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, bus bay, and standard shelter stop $42,000 No 45 26 6 TWIN VEE VEE St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk and standard shelter stop $42,000 No 45 27 34 PINEAPPLE COMMONS Martin Northbound Map/Information $200 No 45 28 38 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Northbound Sidewalk and map/information $200 No 45 29 7 FARMER'S MARKET St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, and map/information $700 No 42 30 11 SPANISH LAKES BLVD & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, and map/information $700 No 42 31 12 LA BUONA VITA & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound Sidewalk, boarding & alighting area, and map/information $700 No 42 32 44 DICKSON DR & US 1 St. Lucie Northbound Map/information $200 No 42 33 45 US 1 & EDWARDS RD St. Lucie Northbound Bus bay, sidewalk, and standard shelter stop $42,000 No 42 34 21 BRITT RD Martin Southbound Boarding & alighting area and map/information $700 No 40 35 37 TREASURE COAST MED BLDG St. Lucie Northbound Sidewalk and standard shelter stop $42,000 No 40 36 24 REGENCY SQUARE Martin Southbound Map/information $200 No 39 37 27 INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE Martin Southbound Map/information $200 No 39 38 8 MIDWAY SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound Map/information $200 No 38 39 43 MIDWAY NORTH St. Lucie Northbound Map/information $200 No 38 40 29 WALMART Martin Northbound Map/information $200 No 35 41 31 US 1 & JOHNSON AVE Martin Northbound Map/information $200 No 35 42 9 RIO MAR SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound Standard shelter stop $41,500 No 33 43 33 PUBLIX @BAKER RD Martin Northbound Place a sign/pole, map/information $400 No 33 44 42 RIO MAR NORTH St. Lucie Northbound Standard shelter stop $41,500 No 33 45 26 MARTIN MEMORIAL SOUTH Martin Southbound Map/information $200 No 29 46 Total Cost $589,300 Total Budget $500,000 Difference -$89,300 *Due to the significantly greater costs, Improvement categories A (bus bay) and B (sidewalks) are excluded from the table. High-end unit cost is used for cost estimate purposes. ** Identification of ROW constraints are based on a visual assessment of photos taken during field work. Additional surveying and engineering analysis needed to verify ROW needs. *** This stop will be relocated to the newly constructed intermodal facility on Avenue D and 8th St effective on 10/03/2011, and thus was excluded for prioritization. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!!!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! 4 47 39 14 38 16 12 36 8 5 7 1 3 15 25 20 23 17 11 32 44 40 28 27 24 33 31 13 US 1 OCEAN DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE OLEANDER AVENUE N 13TH ST BECKER RDMIDWAY RD. FLORESTA DRIVE EASY ST WALTON ROAD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD GREEN RIVER PARKWAY SAEGER RD. AVE "O" RIO MAR DR TPK US 1 I-95 SR 76 SR 707 SR A1A SR 714 /CR 714 HIGH MEADOW COVE RD CR 76A /CR 711 WILLOUGHBY BLVD UNNAMED1 SALERNO RD SAVANNAH RD 42ND ST PALMER ST VETERANS MEM PKWY A t l a n t i c O c e a n 0 0.5 1Miles EL a k e O k e e c h o b e e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! 9 42 2945 43 10 6 2 26 3037 22 46 41 35 19 21 34 18 US 1 OCEAN DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE OLEANDER AVENUE N 13TH ST BECKER RDMIDWAY RD. FLORESTA DRIVE EASY ST WALTON ROAD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD SUNRISE BLVD CITRUS AVE GREEN RIVER PARKWAY FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE AVE "O" AVE "H" TPK US 1 I-95 SR 76 SR 707 SR A1A SR 714 /CR 714 HIGH MEADOW COVE RD CR 76A /CR 711 UNNAMED1 WILLOUGHBY BLVD SALERNO RD SAVANNAH RD 42ND ST PALMER ST VETERANS MEM PKWY Southbound Stop Northbound Stop Legend Stop Improvement Priority Category ! Very High (Rank: 1-10) ! High (Rank: 11-20) ! Medium (Rank: 21-30) ! Low (Rank: 31-47) TCC Route Map 2-2 TCC Bus Stop Priority Results Note: Numbers next to each stop indicate priority ranks corresponding to Table 2-3 in the report Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 3-1 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 3: Additional Considerations & Next Steps The previous sections of this technical memorandum documented the efforts undertaken to develop a preliminary Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan for the US 1 corridor. It is important to note, however, that this plan is only the first step toward implementation of bus stop improvements. This section presents additional considerations and potential next steps that likely will need to be taken to continue progress toward implementation of the bus stop improvement plan. Since the next steps go beyond the scope of bus stop capital plan development, it will be critical for the Treasure Coast RTO, with the help of staff, to identify responsibilities for addressing these considerations and facilitating plan implementation. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Sidewalk Needs To meet the minimum standards for ADA, each bus stop must be connected via an accessible path to the nearest sidewalk or other accessible facility. During the field work conducted for this project, stops without sidewalk connections were identified and recommended for improvement. However, an accurate measurement of the distance that needs to be paved with sidewalk will require further surveying and engineering analysis, as many of the locations are lengthy and beyond the immediate vicinity of the bus stops. This, in turn, will lead to a more accurate estimate of probable cost. The geometric conditions of a bus stop, as well as the influence of the surrounding area, can cause each bus stop site to be designed differently to comply with accessibility standards. Right-of-Way Constraints Potential ROW constraints at bus stops were identified previously in Table 2-3. The constraints reflect professional judgment based on field observations. As a result, some bus stop improvements will require a more rigorous assessment to more accurately identify ROW constraints and requirements ((if any). For example, a standard shelter stop requires a clear zone minimum of 5 ft wide by 10 ft long, and such a stop may be recommended in the parking lot of a shopping plaza. In this case, a joint use agreement or ROW acquisition would be necessary to ensure that adequate land area is needed for the placement of a standard shelter stop. In addition, while many of the bus stops are located within the public roadway ROW of US 1, some of the stops are located on privately-owned or publiclyowned lands outside the US 1 public ROW. The counties have developed a process through interlocal or joint use agreements with private property owners or public jurisdictions to place these stops, and it is reasonable to expect similar contractual mechanisms could be used in most or all cases where ROW is not available for a recommended improvement. Architectural Design and Engineering To ensure consistency of bus stop architectural design and engineering along the US 1 corridor, a unique and aesthetically-pleasing architectural design and branding scheme should be developed and adopted by the Treasure Coast RTO. This consideration should be addressed as the bus stop improvement plan approaches the design and engineering phase. For example, the boarding and alighting area should be a firm, solid, and level platform with a minimum clear length of 8 ft and a minimum clear width of 5 ft. A standard bus shelter should include bench seating Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 3-2 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 3: Additional Considerations & Next Steps as part of the shelter structure. Additionally, the color and architectural design, use of logos or similar route map information, or other “regional” branding or identification should be incorporated into the design and improvements along the US 1 corridor. It is recommended that the Treasure Coast RTO lead an effort to develop architectural design standards and a branding scheme. Consistent with previous suggestions from RTO Board members, this effort should include input from the Transit Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC), the committee established to provide technical advice to the RTO Board, and local tourism and/or economic development councils and other entities identified by the RTO. Maintenance and Effectiveness of Infrastructure As noted previously, current infrastructure servicing riders of the TCC route is located throughout the corridor on ROW owned or permitted by multiple jurisdictions and on both public and private properties. Maintenance of the current facilities is being accomplished through various arrangements and agreements. Proposed infrastructure in this plan will also be located on ROW or property under the control of multitude jurisdictions and entities. As improvements are approved and permitted, arrangements for maintenance and upkeep should be considered. Additionally, working with local jurisdictions, transit operators should consider how to enhance the access of pedestrians and bicyclists from neighborhoods within a quarter mile of stops as they are improved. This effort should include outreach strategies for improving the awareness of the stop improvements as well as availability of the TCC service along the US 1 corridor. NEXT STEPS Next steps are largely related to grant administration and management. With the FDOT grant process, a number of actions must be completed to implement this capital improvement plan. After discussion and approval of the plan by the Treasure Coast RTO and submittal to FDOT, the plan should be submitted through the TPO and MPO planning process. Additionally, since the RTO is not eligible to receive and manage the grant, another jurisdiction must be tasked with managing the grant locally with direction from the RTO Board. Given historical experience with other joint transit grants, the RTO Board may want to request that St. Lucie County be the grant recipient and project manager. The key next steps are included in Table 3-1, along with the identification of agencies that take lead role and other involved agencies, and estimated time frame to complete each step. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization September 2011 3-3 US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan SECTION 3: Additional Considerations & Next Steps Table 3-1 Next Steps for US 1 Capital Infrastructure Improvement Plan Step Description Lead Role Other Time Frame Identify designated recipient for bus stop capital grant from FDOT. FDOT Designated Agency 1-3 Months Prepare and process FDOT contract (Joint Participation Agreement) with designated recipient. FDOT Designated Agency 2-6 months Complete an assessment regarding stop location and placement to determine if site is most appropriate location from an operational and safety standpoint. Local Transit Agencies FDOT 2-6 months Determine need for interlocal agreements between the designated recipient and appropriate local jurisdictions. Designated Recipient Local Jurisdictions 2-12 months Prepare and execute interlocal agreements. Designated Recipient Local Jurisdictions 2-15 months Develop consensus on bus stop architectural design and regional branding. TCRTO Local Jurisdictions 2-6 months Complete appropriate surveying and engineering analysis to obtain permits. Designated Recipient Local Jurisdictions 2-6 months Develop scope of work activities for improvements at each bus stop. Designated Recipient Local Jurisdictions 4-15 months Process and obtain appropriate permitting, as necessary, for recommended improvements along the US 1 corridor (from the appropriate permitting jurisdiction). Designated Recipient Local Jurisdictions 4-15 months Assess the need for and pursue interlocal and joint use agreements with private and public property owners along the US 1 corridor (as necessary). Local Transit Agencies RTO and Designated Recipient 4-15 months SUMMARY In summary, this technical memorandum documents the data collection, evaluation methodology, and results used to develop a preliminary Bus Stop Capital Improvement Plan for the US 1 Corridor. The preliminary plan will be finalized with comments from the TTAC and direction of the Treasure Coast RTO Board. Appendix A Bus Stop Inventory Data Collection Sheet Treasure Coast Connector Corridor Jurisdiction Stop Sign Stop Pads Bus Bay Bench Shelter System Maps and Information Stop Lighting Street lighting nearby Trash Receptacles Bike Racks Public Telephone Sidewalk/accessible connection Curb and gutter or flush Other (Please Specify) Senior Center Medical Office Library Hospital School for physically or mentally disabled Apartment Building Office Building Government Services Shopping Mall or Center Recreation activities School or University Civic or Convention Center 1 10th STREET & AVENUE C St. Lucie Southbound Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No Park & Restrooms 2 BENTON BUILDING St. Lucie Southbound Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No 3 CASH AMERICA St. Lucie Southbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 4 K-MART PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 5 SABAL PALM PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 6 TWIN VEE St. Lucie Southbound Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 7 FARMER'S MARKET St Lucie Southbound Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No TABLE A-1 TREASURE COAST CONNECTOR CORRIDOR BUS STOP INVENTORY DATA COLLECTION SHEET Stop ID Stop Name Direction Stop Amenities Special Needs (Adjacent to following land uses) other Activity Centers FARMER S St. 8 MIDWAY SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound Yes yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 9 RIO MAR SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound Yes yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 10 CHASE BANK St. Lucie Southbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 11 SPANISH LAKES BLVD & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 12 LA BUONA VITA & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 15 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Southbound Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No 16 CVS/PHARMACY St. Lucie Southbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No 17 TOWN CENTER STAPLES St. Lucie Southbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No 18 WALMART St. Lucie Southbound /Northbound No yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No LOWE'S BJ'S Martin 19 LOWE S & BJ S Southbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes* No No *restaurant 20 TREASURE COAST MALL Martin Southbound /Northbound Yes yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No 21 Britt Road Martin Southbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No 22 Downtown Publix Martin Southbound Yes yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No 23 Winn-Dixie @Monterey Martin Southbound Yes yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes * No No *Gymnasium 24 Regency Square Martin Southbound Yes yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No 25 Wedgewood Plaza Martin Southbound Yes yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes* No No No *Publix Jurisdiction Stop Sign Stop Pads Bus Bay Bench Shelter System Maps and Information Stop Lighting Street lighting nearby Trash Receptacles Bike Racks Public Telephone Sidewalk/accessible connection Curb and gutter or flush Other (Please Specify) Senior Center Medical Office Library Hospital School for physically or mentally disabled Apartment Building Office Building Government Services Shopping Mall or Center Recreation activities School or University Civic or Convention Center 26 Martin Memorial South Martin Southbound Yes yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No 27 Indian River State College Martin Southbound Yes yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No 28 Salerno Village Square Martin Southbound/Northbound No yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No *Winn Dixie 29 WalMart Martin Northbound Yes yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No **Wal-Mart 30 Stuart Center Martin Northbound Yes yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No 31 US 1 & Johnson Ave Martin Northbound Yes yes No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No Activity Centers Stop Name Direction other Stop Amenities Special Needs (Adjacent to following land uses) TABLE A-1 (CONTINUED) BUS STOP INVENTORY DATA COLLECTION SHEET TREASURE COAST CONNECTOR CORRIDOR Stop ID 32 Kiwanis P-N-R Martin Northbound No yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Park 33 Publix @Baker Rd Martin Northbound No yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No *Publix 34 Pineapple Commons (Britt Rd) Martin Northbound Yes yes No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No 35 CRACKER BARREL Martin Northbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes* No No No No No *bank 36 JENNINGS ROAD St. Lucie Northbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 37 TREASURE COAST MED BLDG St. Lucie Northbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes* No No No No No No No No *across the bus stop sign 38 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Northbound Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes* No No No No No No *across the bus stop sign 39 SAVANNA CLUB ROAD & US 1 St. Lucie Northbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No adjacent gas station 40 VENETIAN RESTAURANT & ARCADE St. Lucie Northbound Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No 41 PRIMA VISTA CROSSINGS St. Lucie Northbound Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No 42 RIO MAR NORTH St. Lucie Northbound Yes yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 43 MIDWAY NORTH St. Lucie Northbound Yes yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 44 DICKSON DR & US 1 St. Lucie Northbound Yes yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 45 US 1 & EDWARDS ROAD St. Lucie Northbound Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No gas station 46 CVS/PHARMACY St. Lucie Northbound Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No CVS 47 US 1 & BOSTON AVE (EAST) St. Lucie Northbound Yes yes No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No Painting store Appendix B Photos of Existing Bus Stops by Location Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 1 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 1 Location: 10th STREET AND AVENUE C STOP # 2 Location: BENTON BUILDING Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 2 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 3 Location: CASH AMERICA STOP # 4 Location: K-MART PLAZA Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 3 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 5 Location: SABAL PALM PLAZA Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 4 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 6 Location: TWIN VEE Note: There was a bench before Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 5 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 7 Location: FARMER'S MARKET Note: There was a bench before Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 6 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 8 Location: MIDWAY SOUTH STOP # 9 Location: RIO MAR SOUTH Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 7 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 10 Location: CHASE BANK STOP # 11 Location: SPANISH LAKES BLVD AND US 1 Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 8 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 12 Location: LA BUONA VITA AND US 1 STOP # 13 Location: EASTPORT PLAZA Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 9 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 14 Location: COUNTY ANNEX BUILDING STOP # 15 Location: MIDPORT I/II Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 10 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 16 Location: CVS/PHARMACY STOP # 17 Location: TOWN CENTER STAPLES Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 11 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 18 Location: WALMART Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 12 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 19 Location: LOWE'S AND BJ'S STOP # 20 Location: TREASURE COAST MALL Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 13 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 21 Location: BRITT ROAD STOP # 22 Location: DOWNTOWN PUBLIX IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 14 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 23 Location: WINN-DIXIE AT MONTEREY IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 15 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 24 Location: REGENCY SQUARE IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 16 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 25 Location: WEDGEWOOD PLAZA IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 17 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 26 Location: MARTIN MEMORIAL SOUTH IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 18 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 27 Location: INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 19 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 28 Location: SALERNO VILLAGE SQUARE IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 20 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 29 Location: WAL-MART IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 21 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 30 Location: STUART CENTER IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 22 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 31 Location: US 1 AND JOHNSON AVE IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 23 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 32 Location: KIWANIS IN MARTIN COUNTY STOP # 33 Location: PUBLIX AT BAKER IN MARTIN COUNTY Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 24 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 34 Location: PINEAPPLE COMMONS (BRITT RD) STOP # 35 Location: CRACKER BARREL Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 25 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 36 Location: JENNINGS ROAD STOP # 37 Location: TREASURE COAST MED BLDG Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 26 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 38 Location: MIDPORT I/II STOP # 39 Location: SAVANNA CLUB ROAD AND US 1 Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 27 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 40 Location: VENETIAN RESTAURANT AND ARCADE STOP # 41 Location: PRIMA VISTA CROSSINGS Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 28 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 42 Location: RIO MAR NORTH STOP # 43 Location: MIDWAY NORTH Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 29 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 44 Location: DICKSON DR AND US 1 STOP # 45 Location: US 1 AND EDWARDS ROAD Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 30 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement STOP # 46 Location: CVS/PHARMACY STOP # 47 Location: US 1 AND BOSTON AVE (EAST) Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 31 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Sample Shelter Types Palm Tran Shelter St Lucie Shelter Summary of Existing Stops Tindale-Oliver & Associates Regional Transit Organization Program September 2011 32 U.S. 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Royal Palm Shelter Downtown West Palm Beach Shelter Appendix C Summary of Bus Stop Prioritization Results Stop ID Absolute Value Score Absolute Value Score Value Score Value Score Existed Score Existed Score Bench Bench Score Shelter Shelter Score System Maps and Information System Maps and Information Score Stop Nighting Street Nighting Stop and Street Lighting Score Trash Receptacles Trash Receptacles Score 1 10th STREET & AVENUE C St. Lucie Southbound 1,095 30 2 10 $3,700 10 near term 10 Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes 0 No 2 No yes 0 Yes 0 2 BENTON BUILDING St. Lucie Southbound 144 20 2 10 $12,200 10 near term 10 Yes 0 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 yes yes 0 No 2 3 CASH AMERICA St. Lucie Southbound 232 30 1 5 $12,000 10 near term 10 Yes 0 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 4 K-MART PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound 107 20 0 0 $12,200 10 near term 10 Yes 0 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 5 SABAL PALM PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound 179 20 0 0 $42,000 0 long term 0 No 5 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No No 3 No 2 6 TWIN VEE St. Lucie Southbound 128 20 0 0 $42,000 0 short term 5 No 5 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 yes yes 0 yes 0 7 FARMER'S MARKET St. Lucie Southbound 55 10 0 0 $700 10 long term 0 No 5 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 yes yes 0 No 2 8 MIDWAY SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound 62 10 0 0 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 yes yes 0 No 2 9 RIO MAR SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound 159 20 0 0 $41,500 0 short term 5 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 10 CHASE BANK St. Lucie Southbound 97 10 1 5 $12,000 10 near term 10 yes 0 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 11 SPANISH LAKES BLVD & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound 39 10 0 0 $700 10 long term 0 No 5 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 12 LA BUONA VITA & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound 32 10 0 0 $700 10 long term 0 No 5 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 13 EASTPORT PLAZA St. Lucie Northbound /Southbound 177 20 1 5 $41,500 0 near term 10 Yes 0 Yes 5 No 4 No 4 0 2 No Yes 0 No 2 14 COUNTY ANNEX BUILDING St. Lucie Northbound /Southbound 194 30 1 5 $41,500 0 short term 5 Yes 0 Yes 5 No 4 No 4 0 2 No Yes 0 No 2 15 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Southbound 49 10 1 5 $900 10 long term 0 No 5 No 5 yes 0 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 16 CVS PHARMACY St. Lucie Southbound 54 10 1 5 $700 10 long term 0 No 5 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 17 TOWN CENTER STAPLES St. Lucie Southbound 79 10 1 5 $900 10 near term 10 No 5 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 18 WALMART St. Lucie Northbound /Southbound 376 30 0 0 $41,700 0 short term 5 yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 19 LOWE'S & BJ'S Martin Southbound 29 10 0 0 $700 10 near term 10 yes 0 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 20 TREASURE COAST MALL Martin Northbound /Southbound 345 30 0 0 $41,500 0 short term 5 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 yes yes 0 No 2 21 BRITT ROAD Martin Southbound 10 0 0 0 $700 10 near term 10 yes 0 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 22 DOWNTOWN PUBLIX Martin Southbound 127 20 1 5 $11,500 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 yes 0 23 WINN DIXIE @MONTERY Martin Southbound 86 10 1 5 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 yes 0 24 REGENCY SQUARE Martin Southbound 69 10 0 0 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 yes 0 25 WEDGEWOOD PLAZA Martin Martin Southbound 135 20 1 5 $11,500 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 yes 0 26 MARTIN MEMMORIAL SOUTH Martin Southbound 25 0 0 0 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 yes yes 0 yes 0 27 INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE Martin Southbound 50 10 0 0 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 yes 0 28 SALERNO VILLAGE SQUARE Martin Southbound /Northbound 212 30 0 0 $11,700 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 yes 0 29 WALMART Martin Northbound 90 10 0 0 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 yes 0 No 2 No yes 0 yes 0 30 STUART CENTER Martin Northbound 112 20 1 5 $11,500 10 near term 10 No 5 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 yes 0 31 US 1 & JOHNSON AVE Martin Northbound 1 0 0 0 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 32 KIWANIS P-N-R Martin Northbound 190 30 1 5 $400 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 yes 0 No 2 No yes 0 yes 0 33 Publix @Baker Rd Martin Northbound 13 0 0 0 $400 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 yes 0 34 PINEAPPL COMMONS (BRITT RD) Martin Northbound 38 10 0 0 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 35 CRACKER BARREL Martin Northbound 36 10 0 0 $700 10 near term 10 yes 0 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 36 JENNINGS ROAD St. Lucie Nothbound 113 20 1 5 $12,000 10 near term 10 yes 0 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 37 TREASURE COAST MED BLDG St. Lucie Nothbound 96 10 1 5 $42,000 0 long term 0 No 5 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 38 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Nothbound 56 10 1 5 $200 10 long term 0 No 5 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 No No 3 No 2 39 SAVANNA CLUB ROAD & US 1 St. Lucie Nothbound 26 10 0 0 $700 10 near term 10 Yes 0 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 40 VENETIAN RESTAURANT & ARCADE St. Lucie Nothbound 53 10 0 0 $700 10 near term 10 yes 0 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 yes yes 0 No 2 41 PRIMA VISTA CROSSINGS St. Lucie Nothbound 138 20 1 5 $42,000 0 short term 5 yes 0 No 5 yes 0 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 42 RIO MAR NORTH St. Lucie Nothbound 172 20 0 0 $41,500 0 short term 5 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 yes yes yes 0 No 2 43 MIDWAY NORTH St. Lucie Nothbound 51 10 0 0 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 yes 0 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 44 DICKSON DR & US 1 St. Lucie Nothbound 62 10 0 0 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 45 US 1 & EDWARDS ROAD St. Lucie Nothbound 148 20 0 0 $42,000 0 long term 0 No 5 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 46 CVS PHARMACY St. Lucie Nothbound 270 30 0 0 $12,200 10 near term 10 No 5 No 5 No 4 No 4 No 2 yes yes 0 No 2 47 US 1 & BOSTON AVE (EAST) St. Lucie Nothbound 42 10 1 5 $200 10 near term 10 yes 0 Yes 0 No 4 No 4 No 2 No yes 0 No 2 TABLE C-1 SUMMARY OF BUS STOP PRIORITIZATION RESULTS Amenities Stop Name Jurisdiction Direction Ridership Connectivity Implementation Cost Implementation Duration Sidewalk Presence Stop Pad Presence Stop ID Existed Score Existed Score Existed Score Existed Score Existed Score Existed Score Existed Score Existed Score 1 10th STREET & AVENUE C St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 62 2 BENTON BUILDING St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 70 3 CASH AMERICA St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 72 4 K-MART PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 57 5 SABAL PALM PLAZA St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 45 6 TWIN VEE St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 45 7 FARMER'S MARKET St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 42 8 MIDWAY SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 38 9 RIO MAR SOUTH St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 33 10 CHASE BANK St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 52 11 SPANISH LAKES BLVD & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 42 12 12 LA BUONA VITA & US 1 St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 42 13 EASTPORT PLAZA St. Lucie Northbound /Southbound No 0 Yes* 3 Yes* 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 58 14 COUNTY ANNEX BUILDING St. Lucie Northbound /Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 Yes* 3 No 0 No 0 60 15 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 46 16 CVS PHARMACY St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 yes 3 50 17 TOWN CENTER STAPLES St. Lucie Southbound No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 60 18 WALMART St. Lucie Northbound /Southbound No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 50 19 LOWE'S & BJ'S Martin Southbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 yes* 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 50 20 TREASURE COAST MALL Martin Northbound /Southbound No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 46 21 BRITT ROAD Martin Southbound No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 40 22 DOWNTOWN PUBLIX Martin Southbound No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 58 23 WINN DIXIE @MONTERY Martin Southbound No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 0 yes* 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 51 24 REGENCY SQUARE Martin Southbound No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 39 25 WEDGEWOOD PLAZA Martin Southbound No 0 No 0 yes* 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 54 26 MARTIN MEMMORIAL SOUTH Martin Southbound yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 29 27 INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE Martin Southbound No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 39 28 SALERNO VILLAGE SQUARE Martin Southbound /Northbound No 0 No 0 yes* 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 63 29 WALMART Martin Northbound No 0 No 0 yes* 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 35 30 STUART CENTER Martin Northbound No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 59 31 US 1 & JOHNSON AVE Martin Northbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 yes 3 35 32 KIWANIS P-N-R Martin Northbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 yes* 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 60 33 Publix @Baker Rd Martin Northbound No 0 No 0 yes* 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 33 34 PINEAPPL COMMONS (BRITT RD) Martin Northbound No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 45 35 CRACKER BARREL Martin Northbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 yes* 3 50 36 JENNINGS ROAD St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 62 37 TREASURE COAST MED BLDG St. Lucie Nothbound yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 40 38 MIDPORT I/II St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 No 0 yes* 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 44 39 SAVANNA CLUB ROAD & US 1 St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 47 40 VENETIAN RESTAURANT & ARCADE St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 50 41 PRIMA VISTA CROSSINGS St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 yes 3 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 46 42 RIO MAR NORTH St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 33 43 MIDWAY NORTH St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 38 44 DICKSON DR & US 1 St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 42 45 US 1 & EDWARDS ROAD St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 42 46 CVS PHARMACY St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 72 47 US 1 & BOSTON AVE (EAST) St. Lucie Nothbound No 0 No 0 No 0 No No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 No 0 47 Recreation Facility Governmental Services Civic or Convention Center Office Building Total Score Medical Facility School or University Shopping Mall Apartment Building TABLE C-1 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF BUS STOP PRIORITIZATION RESULTS Stop Name Jurisdiction Direction Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Board/Committee: RTO Board Meeting Date: October 20, 2011 Item Number: 8c Item Title: Action Item – Adopt RTO Board Meeting Dates Item Description: The RTO Board is required to adopt meeting dates. Proposed meeting dates are identified in the attached plan. The Ft. Pierce representative from the St. Lucie TPO has a conflict with the proposed dates. This conflict should be addressed by the RTO Board. Action: Approve, approve with conditions, or do not approve the proposed meeting dates. Staff Recommendation: It is recommended that the proposed meeting dates be discussed by the RTO Board. Attachments ? Proposed meeting date schedule TCRTO Proposed Meeting Dates AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 31 30 31 FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 26 27 28 29 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 RTO Board Meetings TTAC Meetings Martin MPO Meetings St. Lucie TPO Meetings Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Board/Committee: RTO Board Meeting Date: October 20, 2011 Item Number: 9 Item Title: Follow-Up Action Items from August 18, 2011 RTO Board Meeting Item Description: The RTO Board requested several resource items during the August 18th meeting. These items included contact information for similar Florida RTA Board members for potential follow-up and a copy of the FDOT/Consultant scope of services for RTO/RTA technical assistance, US 1 Corridor Capital Improvement Plan, and administrative support. Both items are attached. Action: N/A Staff Recommendation: N/A Attachments ? Contact list for similar Florida RTA members ? Copy of FDOT/Consultant Scope of Services Florida RTA Contacts813.282.8200 jbeckett@mywinterhaven.com 941.932.9454 x454 bernis.smith@cityofbradenton.com Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority, FL Executive Director: Board Member: Bob Clifford, AICP Bernis Smith, City of Bradenton Thomas Phillips 863.688.7433 Polk Transportation Authority, FL Jamie Beckett City of Winter Haven Commissioner 863.291.5600 John M. Lewis, Jr. 407.254.6214 jlewis@golynx.com Buddy Dyer Major, City of Orlando 407.246.2221 buddy.dyer@cityoforlando.net Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority, FL 727.893.7117 Joe Giulietti Kristin Jacobs 954.357.7002 Executive Director/CEO: Board Member: Brad Miller Jeff Danner 727.540.1800 Council Member, City of St. Petersburg judy.tension@stpete.org Owner, MBK Properties, Inc. executivedirector@tbarta.com halep@gohart.org (Catherine Jones, Tampa City Council Support Specialist) 813.274.8131 954.942.7245 Broward County Commissioner South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (Tri-Rail), FL Executive Director/CEO: Board Member: Philip Hale Mike Suarez 813.223.6831 City of Tampa Councilman Executive Director/CEO: Board Member: Executive Director: Board Member: Michael Blaylock 904.630.3181 mblaylock@jtafla.com Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART), FL Edward Burr President/CEO GreenPointe Holdings, LLC 904.996.2485 Jacksonville Transportation Authority, FL Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority (LYNX), FL Executive Director/CEO: Board Member: Chief Executive Officer Board Member: RTO Implementation and Other Support Services FDOT District 4-CUTR -TOA May 15, 2011 1 GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TASK ORDER # 429 Contract BDK84 Regional Transit Organization Implementation and Miscellaneous Support The Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) at the University of South Florida has been tasked with providing support services for the Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization (RTO) implementation effort. The task order, described herein, is issued by the FDOT District 4 Modal Development Office under the General Services Agreement with CUTR. Upon approval of this task order, CUTR will contract with Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) to accomplish various study and technical assistance tasks associated with the implementation of the RTO in St. Lucie and Martin counties. The CUTR/TOA team provides the skills and experience capabilities to accomplish this work and have had specific prior joint-work activities in the development of the RTO. SCOPE OF SERVICES REGIONAL TRANSIT ORGANIZATION IMPLEMENTATION The CUTR team will directly cooperate with the RTO staff to provide technical assistance and miscellaneous support related to the development of strategies toward establishing a RTA, as outlined under the Treasure Coast Regional Transit Organization interlocal agreement dated January 13, 2011. The CUTR team will conduct the associated tasks further described in this task order in cooperation with the Martin County MPO staff and St. Lucie TPO staff. Support services will include staff/administrative support to the RTO, technical support for implementing regional transit service improvements, and provide report documentation for monitoring progress and potential development of a regional authority. Areas of support are further described below in four specific tasks. It is anticipated that the CUTR tasks will be conducted within a one (1) year timeframe and provide the basis for the RTO Board to take formal action toward the potential creation of a Regional Transit Authority (RTA). Task 1.0 RTO Staff Support The CUTR team will provide ongoing technical assistance in the form of staff support services to the RTO Board. This effort will include ongoing cooperation with the Martin MPO and the St. Lucie Urban Area TPO. The CUTR team will provide full staff support for six (6) regular meetings of the RTO Board during this task order duration. Specific duties will include: ? Planning and scheduling meeting locations and necessary logistics ? Developing and sending meeting notices ? Preparing agenda and packets for meetings, including necessary supporting items ? Completing meeting summaries, tracking action items, and preparing reports ? Other administrative support duties as necessary RTO Implementation and Other Support Services FDOT District 4-CUTR -TOA May 15, 2011 2 A program schedule will be developed prior to the second RTO Board meeting that demonstrates how each meeting (supported by this task order) will build to the development of an overall strategy to further develop transit in the region, including the potential timeline and steps for the establishment of a Regional Transit Authority. This plan will build upon the strategies and timeline for establishing a RTA identified in the Regional TDP Transit Authority Action Plan. Each meeting will include a theme or program guiding the development of an Efficiency Report, identified as Task 4.0 below. Based on the needs of the meetings, special guests or attendees may be invited to the RTO Board meetings to assist in educational support, decision making, or other expertise as needed. Meeting agendas will be prepared in cooperation with the RTO Chairperson, FDOT Project Manager, and MPO/TPO Directors. A project management kick-off meeting will be conducted by CUTR with Martin County MPO and St. Lucie County staffs along with the designated FDOT project manager. Task 2.0 Technical Support and Facilitation of Regional Transit Services The CUTR team will provide technical assistance and facilitation for the development of regional transit service improvements. Specifically, the CUTR team will work with FDOT, local transit providers, and the MPO/TPO to develop a capital program for infrastructure improvements along the US 1 corridor to support and expand the Treasure Coast Connector services. These improvements may include shelters, benches, bus pull outs, and other facilities to foster improved access to bus stops and services along the corridor. This effort will include developing guidelines for the corridor that will provide an overview of what the corridor design will include and expectations for infrastructure placement and aesthetics. Special attention will be given to funding approved and available for US 1in the next State fiscal year (FY 2012 Discretionary Capital Funds from FDOT). Additionally, this task will include the development of criteria that can be used to prioritize infrastructure projects along the corridor. This task will include a workshop-type meeting with FDOT, the RTO Transit Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC), transit providers, and the MPO/TPO to set the framework for the design guidelines and improvement process and decisions. The workshop results will be documented, and a capital program and design guidelines will be developed by August 1, 2011. Additionally, the capital program and design guidelines will be presented to the RTO Board (at one of the meetings identified in Task 1.0), the Martin MPO Board, and the St. Lucie Urban Area TPO Board (at their joint meeting). Under this task, the CUTR team will review the Public Involvement Plans (PIP) of both the Martin MPO and St. Lucie Urban Area TPO to identify activities that will support or can be enhanced to support the development of regional transit services. A short white paper (3-5 pages) will be developed to outline ideas that can be shared and incorporated into the PIP activities by the MPO and TPO as appropriate. The white paper will be completed and reviewed by the RTO Board by September 30, 2011. Implementation of the PIP recommendations will be the responsibility of the MPO/TPO staff as directed and approved by the MPO Board. RTO Implementation and Other Support Services FDOT District 4-CUTR -TOA May 15, 2011 3 Task 3.0 Establishment of an RTO Transit Technical Advisory Committee The CUTR team will facilitate the establishment of a Transit Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) to provide technical guidance and advice to the RTO Board. This will include cooperating with the MPO/TPO Directors, RTO Board Chairperson, and FDOT Project Manager to identify potential members for the TTAC, with initial member listings based on recommendations from previous studies. The RTO Board will make the final selection of the TTAC membership. An organizational meeting of the TTAC will be scheduled, and invitations will be prepared and forwarded. A meeting agenda packet will be developed to include, at a minimum, a review of the expectations, purpose, objectives, roles, responsibilities, schedule, and potential products of the TTAC. The CUTR team will provide staff support and facilitate the organizational meeting of the TTAC and prepare a meeting summary to include action items. The CUTR team will provide ongoing technical assistance in the form of staff support services to the TTAC. This effort will include ongoing cooperation with the Martin MPO and the St. Lucie Urban Area TPO. Specific duties will include: ? Planning and scheduling meeting locations and necessary logistics ? Developing meeting notices ? Preparing agenda and packets for meetings, including necessary supporting items ? Completing meeting summaries and tracking action items The CUTR team will provide full staff support for six (6) total regular meetings of the TTAC during the project duration. Meeting agendas will be prepared in cooperation with the TPO and MPO Directors and in cooperation with the TTAC Chairperson, RTO Chairperson, and FDOT Project Manager. Based on the needs of the meetings, special guests or attendees may be invited to the TTAC meetings to assist in educational support and provide appropriate guidance (e.g., for legal issues or grant requirements). Task 4.0 Development of an Efficiency Report The CUTR team will develop an Efficiency Report that will document the RTO process and provide conclusions and final decisions and recommendations to the RTO related to moving forward with the potential establishment of a Regional Transit Authority (RTA). As the RTO process moves forward over the duration of this project, the Project Team will strive to facilitate conclusions and consensus with the RTO Board regarding recommendations on how to move forward. As outlined above in Task 1.0, a plan will be developed so that each RTO Board meeting will have a program theme regarding the role, responsibility, Board representation, organizational structure, authority duties, and other considerations regarding the potential establishment of an RTA. This report will include updates to the action steps the RTO could take if moving forward with the RTA, such as providing elements of legislative language for RTA creation, timeline for implementation, potential referendum considerations, staff services for the RTO, and other elements required as part of establishing an RTA. RTO Implementation and Other Support Services FDOT District 4-CUTR -TOA May 15, 2011 4 DELIVERABLES The CUTR team will provide written progress reports that detail the work performed on each task. Progress reports will be submitted on a monthly basis concurrent with the monthly invoice. Additionally, the project will include the following deliverables: ? Prior to the second RTO Board meeting a Program Schedule report will be prepared to demonstrate how each meeting will build to the development of an overall strategy to further develop transit in the region, which may include the establishment of a Regional Transit Authority (RTA). ? Each meeting will include a theme or subject matter guiding the strategy for establishing a RTA. ? Each meeting will yield an agenda, meeting minutes, a goal as decided upon by the RTO and a solution or guiding strategy of that goal, and follow-up action items. ? Capital Improvements Plan for the US 1 corridor (due by August 1, 2011) ? Design guidelines for the US 1 corridor (due by August 1, 2011) ? Criteria for project prioritization (due by August 1, 2011) ? TTAC meeting materials and reports ? Efficiency Report (due 12 months from Notice to Proceed) ? Public Involvement Plan White Paper (due September 30, 2011) Additional documents requested and prepared through this task order will be completed and submitted to FDOT as agreed upon when the effort is requested and approved. PROJECT TEAM The CUTR/TOA project team for this task will include the following: ? Rob Gregg, CUTR ? Ann Joslin, CUTR ? Bill Ball, TOA ? Richard Dreyer, TOA ? Ryan Suarez, TOA ? Seyla Gonzalez, TOA ? Other staff as appropriate RTO Implementation and Other Support Services FDOT District 4-CUTR -TOA May 15, 2011 5 PROJECT SCHEDULE This Task Work Order will begin upon execution and receipt of a Notice to Proceed (NTP) from FDOT with project duration of 12 months from NTP. The project duration can be extended by written agreement and upon approval by FDOT.